UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

 

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

 

 

or

 

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from                  to

 

Commission file number:   000-51928

 

CPI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

75-3142681
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

811 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, California 94303-1110
(650) 846-2900
(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x     No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  o          Accelerated filer  o         Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o     No  x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding for each of the registrant’s classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date: 16,032,824 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, at August 7, 2006.

 




 

CPI International, Inc.
and Subsidiaries

INDEX

Part I:   Financial Information

 

 

Item 1.

 

Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

4

 

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

 

5

 

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

7

 

 

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

8

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

30

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

47

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

47

Part II: Other Information

 

 

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

48

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

48

Item 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

49

Item 3.

 

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

50

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

50

Item 5.

 

Other Information

 

50

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

 

50

 

2




CPI International, Inc.
and Subsidiaries

Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, readers can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results projected, expected or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risk factors include, without limitation, competition in our end markets; our significant amount of debt; changes or reductions in the U.S. defense budget; U.S. government contracts laws and regulations; changes in technology; the impact of unexpected costs; inability to obtain raw materials and components; and currency fluctuations. All written and oral forward-looking statements made in connection with this report that are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing risk factors and other cautionary statements included herein and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

The information in this report is not a complete description of our business or the risks and uncertainties associated with an investment in our securities. You should carefully consider the various risks and uncertainties that impact our business and the other information in this report and in our other filings with the SEC before you decide to invest in our securities or to maintain or increase your investment.

3




 

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CPI International, Inc.
and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data—unaudited)

 

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

12,606

 

$

26,511

 

Restricted cash

 

854

 

1,287

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

48,173

 

39,295

 

Inventories

 

54,213

 

50,620

 

Deferred tax assets

 

11,683

 

12,346

 

Prepaids and other current assets

 

5,137

 

3,981

 

Total current assets

 

132,666

 

134,040

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

86,651

 

83,624

 

Deferred debt issue costs, net

 

9,995

 

11,061

 

Intangible assets, net

 

76,102

 

77,941

 

Goodwill

 

145,462

 

145,462

 

Other long-term assets

 

2,408

 

2,416

 

Total assets

 

$

453,284

 

$

454,544

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

21,467

 

$

21,421

 

Accrued expenses

 

26,829

 

27,247

 

Product warranty

 

6,295

 

6,359

 

Income taxes payable

 

5,749

 

1,546

 

Advance payments from customers

 

5,218

 

12,067

 

Total current liabilities

 

65,558

 

68,640

 

Deferred income taxes

 

34,024

 

35,556

 

Advance payments from sale of San Carlos property

 

13,450

 

13,450

 

Long-term debt

 

246,768

 

284,231

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

31

 

 

Total liabilities

 

359,831

 

401,877

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock ($0.01 par value, 90,000,000 shares authorized; 16,030,153 and 13,078,954 shares issued and outstanding, respectively)

 

160

 

131

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

65,009

 

34,595

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

936

 

1,621

 

Retained earnings

 

27,348

 

16,320

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

93,453

 

52,667

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

453,284

 

$

454,544

 

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

4




CPI International, Inc.
and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, except share and per share data—unaudited)

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

July 1, 2005

 

Sales

 

$

87,761

 

$

87,639

 

Cost of sales

 

60,867

 

57,848

 

Gross profit

 

26,894

 

29,791

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

2,515

 

1,899

 

Selling and marketing

 

5,248

 

4,744

 

General and administrative

 

5,441

 

5,764

 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

 

548

 

548

 

Net loss on disposition of assets

 

212

 

25

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

13,964

 

12,980

 

Operating income

 

12,930

 

16,811

 

Interest expense, net

 

5,945

 

5,697

 

Income before income taxes

 

6,985

 

11,114

 

Income tax expense

 

2,517

 

4,416

 

Net income

 

$

4,468

 

$

6,698

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges

 

(196

)

(711

)

Comprehensive income

 

$

4,272

 

$

5,987

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.51

 

Diluted

 

$

0.27

 

$

0.48

 

Shares used to compute net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

15,039,754

 

13,078,954

 

Diluted

 

16,766,822

 

13,978,215

 

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

5




CPI International, Inc.
and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, except share and per share data—unaudited)

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

July 1, 2005

 

Sales

 

$

257,069

 

$

245,835

 

Cost of sales, including $351 of amortization of acquisition-related inventory write-up for the nine months ended July 1, 2005

 

179,223

 

163,263

 

Gross profit

 

77,846

 

82,572

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

6,366

 

5,205

 

Selling and marketing

 

14,952

 

13,397

 

General and administrative

 

17,419

 

15,391

 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

 

1,642

 

6,940

 

Net loss on disposition of assets

 

420

 

273

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

40,799

 

41,206

 

Operating income

 

37,047

 

41,366

 

Interest expense, net

 

18,409

 

14,509

 

Income before income taxes

 

18,638

 

26,857

 

Income tax expense

 

7,610

 

10,741

 

Net income

 

$

11,028

 

$

16,116

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges

 

(685

)

(328

)

Comprehensive income

 

$

10,343

 

$

15,788

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.80

 

$

1.23

 

Diluted

 

$

0.71

 

$

1.16

 

Shares used to compute net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

13,736,031

 

13,078,954

 

Diluted

 

15,443,427

 

13,851,963

 

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

6




CPI International, Inc.
and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands—unaudited)

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,
2006

 

July 1,
2005

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

1,918

 

$

13,770

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred expenses relating to sale of San Carlos property

 

(212

)

(216

)

Purchase of Econco, net of cash acquired

 

 

(18,325

)

Capital expenditures

 

(8,419

)

(8,867

)

Other investing activities

 

 

(16

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(8,631

)

(27,424

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of floating rate senior notes

 

 

79,200

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

 

52,942

 

 

Proceeds from senior term loan

 

10,000

 

 

Special cash dividends

 

(17,000

)

(75,809

)

Repayments on senior term loan

 

(47,500

)

(9,550

)

Payments for debt issue costs

 

 

(3,455

)

Payment of IPO costs

 

(5,634

)

 

Other financing activities

 

 

(100

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(7,192

)

(9,714

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

(13,905

)

(23,368

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

26,511

 

40,476

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

12,606

 

$

17,108

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

13,714

 

$

8,160

 

Cash paid for taxes, net of refunds

 

$

5,205

 

$

10,820

 

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

7




CPI International, Inc.
and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(All tabular dollar amounts in thousands except share and per share amounts)

1.                 Basis of Presentation

Unless the context otherwise requires, (1) “CPI International” means CPI International, Inc., (2) “Predecessor” means Communications & Power Industries Holding Corporation, the predecessor to CPI International, (3) “CPI” means Communications & Power Industries, Inc. and (4) “Merger” means the January 23, 2004 merger pursuant to which CPI International acquired the Predecessor. CPI is a direct subsidiary of CPI International. CPI International is a holding company with no operations of its own. The terms “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to CPI International, or the Predecessor, as applicable, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements represent the consolidated results and financial position of CPI International, a Delaware corporation, which is controlled by affiliates of The Cypress Group L.L.C. (“Cypress”). CPI International, through its wholly owned subsidiary, CPI, develops, manufactures, and distributes microwave and power grid Vacuum Electron Devices (“VEDs”), microwave amplifiers, modulators and various other power supply equipment and devices. The Company has two reportable segments, VED and satcom equipment.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.  In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company and its consolidated results of operations and comprehensive income and cash flows.

The Company’s fiscal year is the 52 or 53-week period ending on the Friday nearest September 30. Fiscal year 2006 comprises the 52-week period ending September 29, 2006, and fiscal year 2005 comprised the 52-week period ended September 30, 2005. All period references are to the Company’s fiscal periods unless otherwise indicated. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005. Certain amounts in prior years’ condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2006 presentation. Net operating results have not been affected by these reclassifications.

2.                 Supplemental Balance Sheet Information

Accounts receivable:   Accounts receivable are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $0.7 million at both June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005.

Inventories:   The following table provides details of inventories, net of reserves:

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Raw materials and parts

 

$

35,045

 

$

29,627

 

Work in process

 

10,580

 

12,540

 

Finished goods

 

8,588

 

8,453

 

 

 

$

54,213

 

$

50,620

 

 

8




 

Reserve for excess, slow moving and obsolete inventory:  

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Beginning balance

 

$

8,655

 

$

8,981

 

Econco acquisition

 

 

729

 

Inventory provision, charged to cost of sales

 

898

 

661

 

Inventory write-offs

 

(259

)

(479

)

Ending balance

 

$

9,294

 

$

9,892

 

 

Reserve for loss contracts and cost in excess of market inventory:  

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Beginning balance

 

$

1,430

 

$

2,845

 

Provision for loss contracts and cost in excess of market

 

 

 

 

 

inventory, charged to cost of sales

 

1,350

 

1,115

 

Reserved inventory sold or otherwise disposed of

 

(1,145

)

(1,879

)

Ending balance

 

$

1,635

 

$

2,081

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets, net:  

June 30, 2006

 

Cost

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net

 

VED core technology

 

$

30,700

 

$

(1,506

)

$

29,194

 

VED application technology

 

19,800

 

(1,932

)

17,868

 

X-ray generator and satcom application technology

 

8,000

 

(1,306

)

6,694

 

Customer backlog

 

17,450

 

(17,450

)

 

Land lease

 

11,810

 

(641

)

11,169

 

Tradename

 

5,800

 

 

5,800

 

Customer list and programs

 

5,700

 

(394

)

5,306

 

Noncompete agreement

 

110

 

(39

)

71

 

 

 

$

99,370

 

$

(23,268

)

$

76,102

 

 

September 30, 2005

 

Cost

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net

 

VED core technology

 

$

30,700

 

$

(1,048

)

$

29,652

 

VED application technology

 

19,800

 

(1,340

)

18,460

 

X-ray generator and satcom application technology

 

8,000

 

(902

)

7,098

 

Customer backlog

 

17,450

 

(17,450

)

 

Land lease

 

11,810

 

(444

)

11,366

 

Tradename

 

5,800

 

 

5,800

 

Customer list and programs

 

5,700

 

(224

)

5,476

 

Noncompete agreement

 

110

 

(21

)

89

 

 

 

$

99,370

 

$

(21,429

)

$

77,941

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9




 

The estimated future amortization expense of purchased amortizable intangible assets as of June 30, 2006 was as follows:

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

Amount

 

2006 (remaining three months)

 

$

612

 

2007

 

2,451

 

2008

 

2,451

 

2009

 

2,432

 

2010

 

2,429

 

Thereafter

 

59,927

 

Total

 

$

70,302

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill:   As of June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 the Company had $145.5 million of goodwill, $131.6 million of which has been allocated to the VED segment and $13.9 million of which has been allocated to the satcom equipment segment. There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended June 30, 2006.

Product warranty:

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Beginning accrued warranty

 

$

6,359

 

$

6,074

 

Amount acquired from Econco

 

 

112

 

Accruals for product warranty, charged to cost of sales

 

4,198

 

3,676

 

Cost of warranty claims

 

(4,262

)

(3,831

)

Ending balance

 

$

6,295

 

$

6,031

 

 

3.             Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt comprises the following:

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Term loan, expiring 2010

 

$

42,500

 

$

80,000

 

8% Senior subordinated notes due 2012

 

125,000

 

125,000

 

Floating rate senior notes due 2015, net of amortized issue discount of $732 and $769, respectively

 

79,268

 

79,231

 

 

 

$

246,768

 

284,231

 

 

Senior credit facility and term loan of CPI:   In connection with the Merger, CPI entered into a $130.0 million credit agreement, which was amended and restated on November 29, 2004, and further amended on February 16, 2005, April 13, 2005, and December 15, 2005 (the “Senior Credit Facility”). The Senior Credit Facility consists of a $40.0 million revolving commitment, with a sub-facility of $15.0 million for letters of credit and $5.0 million for swingline loans (“Revolver”), which expires on January 23, 2010, and a $90.0 million term loan (“Term Loan”), which expires on July 23, 2010. As of June 30, 2006 the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Revolver and $42.5 million outstanding under the Term Loan, after the $47.5 million aggregate Term Loan repayments in May 2006 using proceeds from our initial public offering of CPI International’s common stock (the “IPO”).  There are no scheduled principal payments due on the Term Loan during the 2006 fiscal year because of the optional Term Loan prepayments made by the Company in fiscal

10




year 2005. Upon certain specified conditions, including compliance on a pro forma basis with the covenants in the Senior Credit Facility, CPI may seek commitments for a new class of term loans, not to exceed $65.0 million. The Senior Credit Facility is guaranteed by CPI International and all of CPI’s domestic subsidiaries and is secured by substantially all of their assets.

On December 15, 2005, CPI International and CPI entered into Amendment No. 3 (the “Amendment”), to the Senior Credit Facility. The Amendment increased the commitments under the Term Loan by $10.0 million, and CPI borrowed an additional $10.0 million thereunder. In addition, among other things, the Amendment (1) permitted CPI to pay a dividend (not to exceed $20.0 million) to CPI International to fund a dividend by CPI International to its stockholders, (2) amended the definition of Excess Cash Flow in the Senior Credit Facility to decrease Excess Cash Flow for CPI’s fiscal year 2006 by the excess of the amount of the dividend described in clause (1) over the gross proceeds of the $10.0 million additional borrowing, and (3) permitted CPI or CPI International to use up to $70.0 million of the proceeds of the initial public offering of CPI International’s common stock to repurchase or redeem its Floating Rate Senior Notes (the “FR Notes”) or CPI’s 8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 (the “8% Notes”).

Any borrowings under the Revolver would currently bear interest at a rate equal to, at CPI’s option, LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum, or the Alternate Base Rate (“ABR”) plus 1.75% per annum. Available borrowings under the Revolver are reduced by any amounts secured through letters of credit; at June 30, 2006, we had letters of credit commitments for $4.2 million. The Term Loan borrowings currently bear interest at a rate equal to, at CPI’s option, LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum or the ABR plus 1.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The ABR is the greater of (a) the Prime Rate and (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%. In addition to customary fronting and administrative fees under the Senior Credit Facility, CPI pays letter of credit participation fees equal to the applicable Revolver LIBOR margin per annum on the average daily amount of the letter of credit exposure, and a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the average daily unused amount of revolving commitment. As of June 30, 2006 (1) the Term Loan borrowing consisted of one tranche of $7.5 million and one tranche of $35.0 million with interest payable on July 5 and July 19, 2006, at 7.38% and 7.51% per annum, respectively and (2) a Revolving commitment of $4.2 million for letter of credit exposure, with letter of credit participation fees and fronting fees payable quarterly at a combined interest rate of 3.0% per annum.

The Senior Credit Facility requires 1.0% of the original Term Loan amount to be repaid annually in quarterly installments of 0.25% beginning June 30, 2004 and continuing for five years, with the remainder due in equal quarterly installments thereafter. CPI is required to prepay its outstanding loans, subject to certain exceptions and limitations, with net cash proceeds received from certain events, including, without limitation (1) all such proceeds received from certain asset sales by CPI International, CPI or any of CPI’s subsidiaries; (2) all such proceeds received from issuances of debt (other than certain specified permitted debt) or preferred stock by CPI International, CPI or any of CPI’s subsidiaries, (3) all such proceeds paid to CPI International, CPI or any of CPI’s subsidiaries from casualty and condemnation events in excess of amounts applied to replace, restore or reinvest in any properties for which proceeds were paid within a specified period and (4) 50% of such proceeds received from issuances of common equity by, or equity contributions to, CPI International.

CPI is also required to make an annual prepayment within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year based on a calculation of Excess Cash Flow (“ECF”), as defined in the Senior Credit Facility, multiplied by a factor of 25%, 50% or 75% depending on the leverage ratio at the end of the fiscal year, less optional prepayments made during the fiscal year. On December 30, 2004, CPI made an ECF payment of $3.9 million. The ECF payment was applied pro rata, in accordance with the provisions of the Senior Credit Facility, against the remaining scheduled installments of Term Loan principal due up to, but not including, the September 30, 2009 scheduled principal installment.

11




 

CPI can make optional prepayments on the outstanding loans at any time without premium or penalty, except for customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR loans. In March 2005, CPI made an optional prepayment of $5.7 million, and in May 2006, CPI made additional optional prepayments of $47.5 million in the aggregate using proceeds from the IPO.  The optional prepayments were applied pro rata, in accordance with the provisions of the Senior Credit Facility, against the remaining scheduled installments of Term Loan principal due up to June 30, 2009, with the balance applied to scheduled installment amounts on or after September 30, 2009, in direct order of maturity.

The Senior Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of CPI International, CPI and CPI’s domestic subsidiaries to: sell assets; engage in mergers and acquisitions; pay dividends and distributions or repurchase their capital stock; incur additional indebtedness or issue equity interests; make investments and loans; create liens or further negative pledges on assets; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; amend agreements or make prepayments relating to subordinated indebtedness; and amend or waive provisions of charter documents in a manner materially adverse to the lenders. CPI and CPI’s subsidiaries must comply with: a minimum interest coverage ratio; a maximum total leverage ratio; a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio; and a maximum capital expenditures limitation, each calculated on a consolidated basis for CPI and CPI’s subsidiaries. CPI International must also comply with a minimum interest coverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio, each calculated on a consolidated basis for CPI International and its subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2006, CPI and CPI International were in compliance with all Senior Credit Facility financial covenants.

Subject in certain cases to applicable notice provisions and grace periods, events of default under the Senior Credit Facility include, among other things: failure to make payments when due; breaches of representations and warranties in the documents governing the Senior Credit Facility; non-compliance by CPI International, CPI and/or CPI’s subsidiaries with certain covenants; failure by CPI International, CPI and/or CPI’s subsidiaries to pay certain other indebtedness or to observe any other covenants or agreements that would allow acceleration of such indebtedness, collectively in excess of $5.0 million at any time; events of bankruptcy or insolvency of CPI International, CPI and/or CPI’s subsidiaries; certain uninsured and unstayed judgments of $5.0 million or more against CPI International; impairment of the security interests in the collateral or the guarantees under the Senior Credit Facility; and a change in control, as defined in the documents governing the Senior Credit Facility.

8% Senior subordinated notes of CPI:   In connection with the Merger on January 23, 2004, CPI issued $125.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 8% Notes. The proceeds of the 8% Notes were used to redeem the Predecessor’s outstanding indebtedness and pay part of the Merger consideration. The 8% Notes have no sinking fund requirements.

The 8% Notes bear interest at the rate of 8.0% per year, payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The 8% Notes will mature on February 1, 2012. The 8% Notes are unsecured obligations, jointly and severally guaranteed by CPI International and each of CPI’s domestic subsidiaries. The payment of all obligations relating to the 8% Notes are subordinated in right of payment to the prior payment in full in cash or cash equivalents of all senior debt (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) of CPI, including debt under the Senior Credit Facility. Each guarantee of the 8% Notes is and will be subordinated to guarantor senior debt (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) on the same basis as the 8% Notes are subordinated to CPI’s senior debt.

At any time or from time to time on or after February 1, 2008, CPI, at its option, may redeem the 8% Notes, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on February 1 of the years indicated below:

12




 

Year

 

Optional
Redemption
Price

 

2008

 

104

%

2009

 

102

%

2010 and thereafter

 

100

%

At any time or from time to time prior to February 1, 2007, and subject to certain conditions, CPI may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8% Notes at a redemption price equal to 108% of the principal amount of the 8% Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption, with the net cash proceeds of one or more qualified equity offerings. At any time on or prior to February 1, 2008, the 8% Notes may also be redeemed or purchased (by CPI or any other person) in whole but not in part, at CPI’s option, upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 8% Notes, plus a “make-whole” premium (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) to the redemption price on February 1, 2008, and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, the date of redemption or purchase.

Upon a change of control, CPI may be required to purchase all or any part of the 8% Notes for a cash price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the date of purchase.

The indenture governing the 8% Notes contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of CPI and its restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) to incur additional indebtedness, sell assets, consolidate or merge with or into other companies, pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, issue capital stock of their subsidiaries, incur liens and enter into certain types of transactions with their affiliates.

Events of default under the indenture governing the 8% Notes include: failure to make payments on the 8% Notes when due; failure to comply with covenants in the indenture governing the 8% Notes; a default under certain other indebtedness of CPI or any of its restricted subsidiaries that is caused by a failure to make payments on such indebtedness or that results in the acceleration of the maturity of such indebtedness; the existence of certain final judgments or orders against CPI or any of the restricted subsidiaries; and the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy events.

Floating rate senior notes of CPI International:   On February 22, 2005, CPI International issued $80.0 million in principal amount of its FR Notes. The FR Notes were issued at a 1% discount. The proceeds from the issuance of FR Notes were used to make a distribution to stockholders of CPI International of approximately $75.8 million and to pay fees and expenses of approximately $3.5 million associated with the issuance of FR Notes. The FR Notes have no sinking fund requirements.

The FR Notes require interest payments at an annual interest rate, reset at the beginning of each semi-annual period, equal to the then six-month LIBOR plus 5.75%, payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The interest rate on the semi-annual interest payment due August 1, 2006 is approximately 10.56% per annum.  CPI International may, at its option, elect to pay interest through the issuance of additional FR Notes for any interest payment date on or after August 1, 2006 and on or before February 1, 2010. If CPI International elects to pay interest through the issuance of additional FR Notes, the annual interest rate on the FR Notes will increase by an additional 1% step-up, with the step-up increasing by an additional 1% for each interest payment made through the issuance of additional FR Notes (up to a maximum of 4%). The FR Notes will mature on February 1, 2015.

The FR Notes are general unsecured obligations of CPI International. The FR Notes are not guaranteed by any of CPI International’s subsidiaries but are structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness

13




and other liabilities of CPI International’s subsidiaries. The FR Notes are senior in right of payment to CPI International’s existing and future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated to the FR Notes.

Because CPI International is a holding company with no operations of its own, CPI International relies on distributions from CPI to satisfy its obligations under the FR Notes. The Senior Credit Facility and the indenture governing the 8% Notes restrict CPI’s ability to make distributions to CPI International. The Senior Credit Facility prohibits CPI from making distributions to CPI International unless there is no default under the Senior Credit Facility and CPI International and CPI satisfy certain leverage ratios. The indenture governing the 8% Notes prohibits CPI from making distributions to CPI International unless, among other things, there is no default under the indenture and the amount of the proposed dividend plus all previous Restricted Payments (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) does not exceed a specified amount.

At any time or from time to time prior to February 1, 2007, CPI International, at its option, may redeem the FR Notes in whole or in part at a “make whole” premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. At any time or from time to time on or after February 1, 2007, CPI International, at its option, may redeem the Notes in whole or in part at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on February 1 of the years indicated below:

Year

 

Optional
Redemption

 

2007

 

103

%

2008

 

102

%

2009

 

101

%

2010 and thereafter

 

100

%

At any time or from time to time prior to February 1, 2007, and subject to certain conditions, CPI International, at its option, may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the FR Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the FR Notes to be redeemed, plus a premium equal to the interest rate per annum on the FR Notes applicable on the date on which the notice of redemption is given, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption, with the net cash proceeds of one or more qualified equity offerings.

Upon a change of control, as defined in the indenture governing the FR Notes, CPI International may be required to purchase all or any part of the outstanding FR Notes for a cash price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the date of purchase.

The indenture governing the FR Notes contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of CPI International and its restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the indenture governing the FR Notes) to incur additional indebtedness, sell assets, consolidate or merge with or into other companies, pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, issue capital stock of their subsidiaries, incur liens and enter into certain types of transactions with their affiliates.

Events of default under the indenture governing the FR Notes include: failure to make payments on the FR Notes when due; failure to comply with covenants in the indenture governing the FR Notes; a default under certain other indebtedness of CPI International or any of its restricted  subsidiaries that is caused by a failure to make payments on such indebtedness or that results in the acceleration of the maturity of such indebtedness; the existence of certain final judgments or orders against CPI International or any of the restricted subsidiaries; and the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy events.

 

14




Debt maturities:   As of June 30, 2006, maturities on long-term debt were as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year

 

Amount

 

2006

 

$

 

2007

 

 

2008

 

 

2009

 

 

2010

 

42,500

 

Thereafter

 

205,000

 

Total

 

$

247,500

 

 

4. Stockholders’ Equity

Common and Preferred Stock:  On April 7, 2006, the Company amended and restated its certificate of incorporation.  The Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for 90,000,000 authorized shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 10,000,000 authorized shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share.  The holder of each share of Common Stock has the right to one vote.  The board of directors has the authority to issue the undesignated Preferred Stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof.    At June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, there were no shares of Preferred Stock outstanding.

On April 7, 2006, in connection with the amendment and restatement of its certificate of incorporation, the Company also effected a 3.059-to-1 stock split of its outstanding shares of common stock as of such date. All share and per share amounts in the accompanying condensed financial statements and accompanying notes have been retroactively restated to reflect the stock split.

On May 3, 2006 the Company completed its IPO.  The Company sold 2,941,200 shares of common stock and the selling stockholders sold 4,117,670 shares, at an initial public offering price to the public of $18.00 per share, resulting in total proceeds to the Company of approximately $47.3 million, net of IPO transaction costs of approximately $5.6 million, which the Company used to repay $47.5 million of the Term Loan under the Senior Credit Facility.  The underwriters for the IPO declined to exercise their option to purchase an additional 1,058,831 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Stock Plans:  The Company has four stock plans: the 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) and the 2000 Stock Option Plan (the “2000 Plan”).

The 2006 Plan provides for an aggregate of up to 1,400,000 shares of our common stock to be available for awards, plus the number of shares subject to awards granted under our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and our 2000 Stock Option Plan that are forfeited, expire or are cancelled after the effective date of the 2006 Plan. All of the Company’s employees (including officers), directors, and consultants are eligible for awards under the 2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan is administered by the compensation committee of the board of directors and awards may consist of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, other stock unit awards, performance awards, dividend equivalents or any combination of the foregoing. The exercise price for stock options generally cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of our shares on the date of grant. In April 2006, the compensation committee delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer to grant options to purchase up to an aggregate 25,000 shares of common stock to employees, other than employees who are executive officers.  On April 27, 2006 we issued options to purchase 297,500 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $18.00 per share.

The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase our stock at a discounted price. An aggregate of 760,000 shares of our common stock is reserved for issuance under this plan. The stock purchase plan is administered by

15




 

the compensation committee of the board of directors. Employees participating in the plan may purchase stock for their accounts according to a price formula set by the compensation committee, as administrator, before the applicable offering period, which cannot exceed 24 months. The price per share will equal a fixed percentage (which may not be lower than 85%) of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the last day of the purchase period in the offering, or the lower of (1) a fixed percentage (not to be less than 85%) of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of commencement of participation in the offering and (2) a fixed percentage (not to be less than 85%) of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of purchase.  The initial ESPP offering period for the quarter ending September 29, 2006, began on July 1, 2006; the participants’ purchase price for CPI International, Inc. common stock will be 85% of the closing market price on the last trading day of the quarter.

Options under the 2004 Plan vest at a rate of 20% to 25% per year and expire 10 years after the grant date. All stock option grants under the 2004 Plan were non-qualified stock options and were issued at exercise prices equal to or greater than the estimated market price of the Company’s common stock at option grant date. The Company has ceased making new grants under the 2004 Plan.

The 2000 Plan was established by the Predecessor, and no further options are available for issuance thereunder. In accordance with the terms of the stock option agreements, the unvested stock options outstanding under the Predecessor’s 2000 Plan became fully vested at the Merger closing date. The 2000 Plan option holders were offered the opportunity to either roll over their stock options into options to purchase common stock of CPI International (“Rollover Options”) or exercise their stock options. Management elected to roll over options to purchase 912,613 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.20 to $0.74 per share. The Rollover Options are otherwise subject to the terms of the 2000 Plan, and, among other things, have a ten year expiration period and are subject to transferability restrictions and continued employment.

Stock Options:  A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option activity for the nine months ending June 30, 2006, is presented below:

 

Number of
Shares (in
thousands)

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in years)

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

 

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

2,895.4

 

$

3.13

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

297.5

 

18.00

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

(8.3

)

10.07

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled

 

(0.1

)

4.32

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

3,184.5

 

4.50

 

7.5

 

$

32,864

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable at end of period

 

2,365.2

 

$

2.85

 

7.1

 

$

27,547

 

 

The weighted average grant-date fair value per share was $12.67 for options granted during the third quarter and first nine months of 2006.

16




 

Changes in the company’s unvested options for the first nine months of 2006 are summarized as follows:

 

Number of
Shares
(in thousands)

 

Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share

 

Unvested at September 30, 2005

 

639.0

 

$

5.26

 

Granted

 

297.5

 

12.67

 

Vested

 

(108.8

)

5.26

 

Cancelled

 

(8.4

)

8.54

 

Unvested at June 30, 2006

 

819.3

 

7.92

 

 

As of June 30, 2006, there was $3.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.8 years.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model.  Since the company’s common stock has not been publicly traded for a sufficient time period, the expected volatility is based on expected volatilities of similar companies that have a longer history of being publicly traded.  The expected life of options granted is based on the simplified method for plain vanilla options in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107.  The risk-free rates are based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant.  Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model for the nine months ending June 30, 2006 are presented below:

Average expected life in years

 

6.47

 

Expected volatility

 

72.00

%

Weighted average risk-free interest rate

 

4.71

%

 

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable and requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility and estimated option life.  For purposes of this valuation model, no dividends have been assumed.

Restricted Stock Awards:  As of June 30, 2006, there were 9,999 shares of restricted stock outstanding.  The restricted stock awards vest over periods of one to three years and have a 10 year contractual life.  There were no restricted stock awards in prior years.

Restricted stock activity for the first nine months of 2006 is summarized as follows:

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

 

Granted

 

10.0

 

Exercised

 

 

Cancelled or expired

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

10.0

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate intrinsic value at end of period

 

$

145

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average remaining contractual life

 

9.8 years

 

 

The grant-date fair value per share was $18.00 for restricted stock awards granted during the first nine months of 2006.

As of June 30, 2006, there was $161,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost, related to unvested restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.9 years.

17




 

Stock-Based Compensation Expense:  At the beginning of fiscal year 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R (“Share-Based Payments”) (“SFAS No. 123R”), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “Share-Based Payment,” for its existing stock option plans under the prospective method. Previously, the Company applied the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. Under the intrinsic value-based method, compensation expense was recorded only if the market price of the stock exceeded the stock option exercise price at the measurement date. The Company will continue to account for stock option awards outstanding at September 30, 2005 using the intrinsic value-based method of measuring equity share options.  The application of SFAS No. 123R had no impact on the Company’s cash position.

Total stock-based compensation costs for the Company’s stock plans in the third quarter and the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 comprise the following:

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,
2006

 

July 1,
2005

 

June 30,
2006

 

July 1,
2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense by caption:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

$

7

 

$

 

$

7

 

$

 

Selling and marketing

 

12

 

 

12

 

 

General and administrative

 

89

 

444

 

90

 

876

 

 

 

$

108

 

$

444

 

$

109

 

$

876

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense by type of award:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

$

89

 

$

444

 

$

90

 

$

876

 

Restricted stock

 

19

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

$

108

 

$

444

 

$

109

 

$

876

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense of approximately $27,000 was capitalized and remained in inventory at June 30, 2006.

5. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses forward exchange contracts to hedge the foreign currency exposure associated with forecasted manufacturing costs in Canada.

The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are designated as a cash flow hedge and are considered “highly effective,” as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The unrealized gains and losses from foreign exchange forward contracts are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized gains and losses from foreign currency exchange contracts are recognized in Cost of sales and General and administrative in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. Net income includes forward currency gains of $0.3 million for each of the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, and $1.3 million and $1.0 million for the nine month periods ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, respectively.

In April 2005, the Company entered into an $80.0 million interest rate swap contract (“the Swap”) to receive variable rate 6-month LIBOR interest and pay 4.15% fixed rate interest, which when combined with the 5.75% margin, results in a fixed rate of 9.9% on the FR Notes through January 31, 2008. The Swap interest payments are made semi-annually, beginning with the first payment on February 1, 2006. The Swap matures on January 31, 2008. The Swap is designated as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133, and the gain or loss from changes in fair value is expected to be highly effective at offsetting the gain or loss from changes in fair value of the FR Notes attributable to changes in interest rates over the contract period. As of June 30, 2006, the

18




 

Company had a collateral deposit of $0.5 million for the Swap, which is included as Other long-term assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount of collateral fluctuates based on the fair value of the Swap. The unrealized gains and losses from the Swap are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. At June 30, 2006, the fair value of the Swap was $1.7 million, and the unrealized gain was approximately $1.0 million, net of related tax expense.

6. Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 includes a $315,000 charge attributable to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, consisting of $505,000 to correct the overstatement of tax benefits recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 for stock-based compensation expense that is not deductible for income tax purposes in a foreign tax jurisdiction, offset by reversal of a $190,000 tax contingency reserve. Income tax expense for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 includes a discrete tax benefit of $173,000 for true-up adjustments to fiscal year 2005 tax expense related to changes in estimates made as a result of filing the 2005 income tax returns. The effective tax rates were approximately 41% and 40% for the first nine months of fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively.

7. Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effects of stock options and restricted stock. Potential common shares that would increase net income per share amounts or decrease loss per share amounts are antidilutive and are, therefore, excluded from net income per share calculations.  Antidilutive potential common shares that could dilute basic net income per share in the future were 307,499 for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal year 2006, and 85,071 shares for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal year 2005.

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Basic weighted average shares oustanding

 

15,039,754

 

13,078,954

 

13,736,031

 

13,078,954

 

Dilutive stock options

 

1,727,068

 

899,261

 

1,707,396

 

773,009

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 

16,766,822

 

13,978,215

 

15,443,427

 

13,851,963

 

 

8. Segments and Related Information

In accordance with SFAS No. 131, the Company has six divisions that meet the criteria of an operating segment, and the Company has two reportable segments: VED and satcom equipment. Amounts not reported as VED or satcom equipment are reported as other. The CEO evaluates performance and allocates resources to each of these divisions based on the Company’s principal performance measure, earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”).

 

19




 

Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following table:

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Revenues from external customers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VEDs

 

$

73,050

 

$

70,363

 

$

205,843

 

$

200,977

 

Satcom equipment

 

14,711

 

17,276

 

51,226

 

44,858

 

Total

 

$

87,761

 

$

87,639

 

$

257,069

 

$

245,835

 

Intersegment product transfers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VEDs

 

$

5,924

 

$

6,935

 

$

18,608

 

$

19,719

 

Satcom equipment

 

 

3

 

1

 

82

 

Total

 

$

5,924

 

$

6,938

 

$

18,609

 

$

19,801

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

EBITDA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VEDs

 

$

19,001

 

$

20,499

 

$

52,462

 

$

56,386

 

Satcom equipment

 

(79

)

2,415

 

4,773

 

6,204

 

Other

 

(3,657

)

(3,705

)

(13,402

)

(9,457

)

Total

 

$

15,265

 

$

19,209

 

$

43,833

 

$

53,133

 

 

The “Other” category for EBITDA consists primarily of corporate operating expenses and international subsidiary sales expenses. Corporate operating expenses include headquarters general and administrative expenses, stock-based compensation expenses, management bonuses, and purchase accounting charges related to the Merger and Econco acquisition and certain other non-operating expenses. Intersegment product transfers are recorded at cost. The “Other” category of EBITDA for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 includes a $3.25 million special bonus to employees and directors, and manufacturing disruption and move related expenses of $3.8 million associated with the relocation of the San Carlos, California manufacturing division to Palo Alto, California. On December 15, 2005, CPI’s Board of Directors approved a payment of $3.25 million in special bonuses to CPI employees and directors (other than directors who are employees or affiliates of Cypress), to reward them for the increase in Company value.

For the reasons listed below, we believe that GAAP-based financial information for highly leveraged businesses such as ours should be supplemented by EBITDA so that investors better understand our financial performance in connection with their analysis of our business:

                      EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our board of directors and management team to evaluate our operating performance;

                      the Senior Credit Facility contains covenants that require us to maintain certain interest expense coverage and leverage ratios that contain EBITDA as a component, and our management team uses EBITDA to monitor compliance with such covenants;

                      EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our management team to make day-to-day operating decisions;

                      EBITDA facilitates comparisons between our operating results and those of competitors with different capital structures and therefore is a component of the measures used by the management to facilitate internal comparisons to competitors’ results and our industry in general; and

20




 

                      the payment of management bonuses is contingent upon, among other things, the satisfaction by us of certain targets that contain EBITDA as a component.

Other companies may define EBITDA differently and, as a result, our measure of EBITDA may not be directly comparable to EBITDA of other companies. Although we use EBITDA as a financial measure to assess the performance of our business, the use of EBITDA is limited because it does not include certain material costs, such as interest and taxes, necessary to operate our business. When analyzing our performance, EBITDA should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income (loss), cash flows from operating activities or other statements of operations or statements of cash flows data prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table reconciles net income to EBITDA:

 

Quarter ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Net income

 

$

4,468

 

$

6,698

 

$

11,028

 

$

16,116

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

2,335

 

2,398

 

6,786

 

11,767

 

Interest expense, net

 

5,945

 

5,697

 

18,409

 

14,509

 

Income tax expense

 

2,517

 

4,416

 

7,610

 

10,741

 

EBITDA

 

$

15,265

 

$

19,209

 

$

43,833

 

$

53,133

 

 

Geographic sales by customer location were as follows:

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

June 30,

 

July 1,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

United States

 

$

54,502

 

$

55,913

 

$

162,709

 

$

162,391

 

All foreign countries

 

33,259

 

31,726

 

94,360

 

83,444

 

Total sales

 

$

87,761

 

$

87,639

 

$

257,069

 

$

245,835

 

 

The United States Government is the only customer that accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s consolidated sales. Direct sales to the United States Government were $16.5 million, and $15.5 million of the Company’s consolidated sales for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, respectively. Sales to this customer were $44.3 million and $45.1 million for the nine month periods ending June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, respectively.

9. San Carlos Sale Agreement

The Company has entered into an agreement to sell the land and close its facilities located in San Carlos, California. The purchase price is $23.8 million. Under the sale agreement, the buyer has paid the Company a $13.0 million deposit on the purchase price, which the Company used to fund the capital expenditures and costs of moving its San Carlos operations to its Palo Alto facility and to a new location in the Palo Alto area. The $13.0 million deposit is nonrefundable unless the Company breaches the sale agreement. The San Carlos facility has preexisting soil and groundwater contamination that has been the subject of some remediation and is expected to undergo additional remediation by the purchaser after the sale closes. In connection with the sale agreement, the Company entered into an agreement regarding environmental conditions at the property and was named as an additional insured on a pollution liability insurance policy obtained by the purchaser that is intended to fund the remediation of the contamination of the San Carlos property to permit hospital and other “unrestricted” uses under the direction of the applicable environmental regulatory agency.

The closing of the sale is subject to a number of conditions, including the requirement that the Company vacate its facilities and obtain regulatory closure of certain permitted equipment located on the property. Although there can be no assurance that the sale of the San Carlos property will occur, the Company expects to close the sale of the property in calendar year 2006.

21




 

Pursuant to the stock sale agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc., the predecessor of Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (“Varian”), and the Company dated June 9, 1995, as amended, the Company agreed to certain development restrictions affecting the San Carlos property. In connection with the San Carlos property sale agreement, Varian agreed to waive certain of the development restrictions on the San Carlos property in the event that the sale closes, subject to certain conditions, and further agreed to pay the Company $1.0 million, of which $0.5 million was paid in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004. The payments from Varian are being accounted for as part of the sale of the property, with the aggregate sales price, including the $23.8 million from the buyer, totaling $24.8 million. In addition, the Company has agreed to relieve Varian of certain of its indemnity obligations to the Company for certain environmental liabilities related to the San Carlos property relating to periods prior to August 1995 and to reimburse Varian for certain potential environmental costs related to the San Carlos property that are not covered by insurance. The Company and Varian have also agreed to certain use restrictions and environmental cost-sharing provisions related to the Company’s property in Beverly, Massachusetts, and the Company has relinquished its right to redevelop that property for residential or similar use.

As of June 30, 2006, the San Carlos land and building was classified as held for use in property, plant and equipment and the advance payments from the sale of the property, aggregating $13.5 million, are classified as a long-term liability in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had deferred expenses of $0.9 million relating to the sale of the San Carlos property and classified these amounts as Other long-term assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The San Carlos land and building had a net book value of $23.4 million as of June 30, 2006 and the building continues to be depreciated over its remaining useful life. Based on current projections of costs, the Company does not expect to recognize a loss on the sale of the San Carlos property.

10. Econco Acquisition

On October 8, 2004, the Company purchased all of the outstanding stock of Econco Broadcast Service, Inc. (“Econco”) of Woodland, California for cash consideration of approximately $18.3 million. The preliminary Econco purchase price estimate of $18.7 million was finalized and adjusted in our financial results in the third quarter of fiscal year 2005.  Econco is a provider of remanufactured high-power microwave devices, allowing broadcasters and other users of these critical products to extend the life of their devices at a cost that is lower than buying a new device.

The Econco acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting as required by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Econco were adjusted to their fair values, and the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price to specific assets and liabilities was based, in part, upon internal estimates of cash flow and recoverability.

The following table summarizes the final allocation of fair value of the Econco assets acquired and liabilities assumed at October 8, 2004:

Net current assets

 

$

2,049

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

3,239

 

Identifiable intangible assets

 

7,210

 

Goodwill

 

5,848

 

Total

 

$

18,346

 

 

22




 

Net current assets at October 8, 2004 included $0.4 million for the revaluation of inventory. The following table presents details of the purchased intangible assets acquired:

 

Weighted-
Average
Useful Life

 

Amount

 

Non-compete agreement

 

5 years

 

$

110

 

Tradename

 

indefinite

 

1,400

 

Customer list and programs

 

25 years

 

5,700

 

Total

 

 

 

$

7,210

 

 

11. Special Cash Dividends

In December 2005, the Board of Directors declared and paid a special cash dividend to stockholders of $17 million. This dividend was paid using (a) the $10 million in net proceeds obtained from the additional borrowing under the Senior Credit Facility in connection with the December 2005 amendment thereto, and (b) available cash. The cash dividend was made on the basis of the stockholders’ relative ownership of CPI International’s outstanding common stock.

In February 2005, the Board of Directors declared and paid a special cash dividend to stockholders of approximately $75.8 million.  The special cash dividend was made on the basis of the stockholders’ relative ownership of CPI International’s outstanding common stock and was paid using the net proceeds from the offering of $80 million aggregate principal amount of the FR Notes.

12. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs — an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4,” which is the result of the FASB’s project to reduce differences between U.S. and international accounting standards. SFAS No. 151 requires idle facility costs, abnormal freight, handling costs, and amounts of wasted materials (spoilage) to be treated as current-period costs. Under this concept, if the costs associated with the actual level of spoilage or production defects are greater than the costs associated with the range of normal spoilage or defects, then the difference would be charged to current-period expense, and not included in inventory costs. The Company adopted SFAS No. 151 in the beginning of fiscal year 2006 and its adoption did not have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,” which clarifies that an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value can be reasonably estimated even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. The Company is required to adopt Interpretation No. 47 by the end of fiscal year 2006. The Company does not expect the implementation of Interpretation No. 47 to have a significant impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS No. 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statement,” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 154 for accounting changes and error corrections in fiscal year 2007. The Company’s results of operations and financial condition will only be impacted by SFAS No. 154 if it implements changes in accounting principle that are addressed by the standard or correct accounting errors in future periods.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments.” SFAS No. 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. As of June 30, 2006, the Company did not

23




 

have any hybrid financial instruments subject to the fair value election under SFAS No. 155. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 155 at the beginning of fiscal year 2007.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment to FASB Statement No. 140.” SFAS No. 156 amends FASB Statement No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets,” with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 156 at the beginning of fiscal year 2007 and as of June 30, 2006, the Company did not have any servicing assets or servicing liabilities.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, which supplements SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” by defining the confidence level that a tax position must meet in order to be recognized in the financial statements. The Interpretation requires that the tax effects of a position be recognized only if it is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained based solely on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The more-likely-than-not threshold represents a positive assertion by management that a company is entitled to the economic benefits of a tax position. If a tax position is not considered more-likely-than-not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits, no benefits of the position are to be recognized.

Moreover, the more-likely-than-not threshold must continue to be met in each reporting period to support continued recognition of a benefit. At adoption, companies must adjust their financial statements to reflect only those tax positions that are more-likely-than-not to be sustained as of the adoption date. Any necessary adjustment would be recorded directly to retained earnings in the period of adoption and reported as a change in accounting principle. This Interpretation is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. We are required to adopt Interpretation No. 48 at the beginning of fiscal year 2008 and management is assessing the potential impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

13. Supplemental Guarantors Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (Unaudited)

On January 23, 2004, CPI issued $125.0 million of 8% Notes that are guaranteed by CPI International and all of CPI’s domestic subsidiaries. Separate financial statements of the guarantors are not presented because (i) the guarantors are wholly-owned and have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the 8% Notes on a joint and several basis, and (ii) the Company’s management has determined that such separate financial statements are not material to investors. Instead, presented below are the consolidating condensed financial statements of: (a) the parent, CPI International, (b) the issuer, CPI, (c) the guarantor subsidiaries, the Company’s domestic subsidiaries (d) the non-guarantor subsidiaries, (e) the consolidating elimination entries, and (f) the consolidated total. The accompanying condensed consolidating financial statements should be read in connection with the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company.

Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for on the equity method. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries, intercompany balances, intercompany transactions and intercompany sales.

 

24




 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Non-Guarantor

 

Consolidating

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Parent

 

Issuer

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

391

 

9,186

 

668

 

2,361

 

 

12,606

 

Restricted cash

 

 

 

746

 

108

 

 

854

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

26,133

 

9,594

 

12,446

 

 

48,173

 

Inventories

 

 

34,278

 

2,030

 

19,009

 

(1,104

)

54,213

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

11,635

 

7

 

41

 

 

11,683

 

Prepaid and other current assets

 

1,112

 

2,836

 

248

 

941

 

 

5,137

 

Intercompany receivable

 

 

30,477

 

 

 

(30,477

)

 

Total current assets

 

1,503

 

114,545

 

13,293

 

34,906

 

(31,581

)

132,666

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

74,120

 

3,041

 

9,490

 

 

86,651

 

Deferred debt issue costs, net

 

3,176

 

6,819

 

 

 

 

9,995

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

60,301

 

6,777

 

9,024

 

 

76,102

 

Goodwill

 

 

92,041

 

5,848

 

47,573

 

 

145,462

 

Other long-term assets

 

1,125

 

1,283

 

 

 

 

2,408

 

Intercompany notes receivable

 

 

1,035

 

 

 

(1,035

)

 

Investment in subsidiaries

 

200,169

 

56,670

 

 

 

(256,839

)

 

Total assets

 

$

205,973

 

406,814

 

28,959

 

100,993

 

(289,455

)

453,284

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

 

10,656

 

579

 

10,232

 

 

21,467

 

Accrued expenses

 

3,366

 

18,852

 

1,087

 

3,524

 

 

26,829

 

Product warranty

 

 

3,853

 

192

 

2,250

 

 

6,295

 

Income taxes payable

 

 

3,819

 

230

 

1,700

 

 

5,749

 

Advance payments from customers

 

 

2,288

 

703

 

2,227

 

 

5,218

 

Intercompany payable

 

28,175

 

 

457

 

1,845

 

(30,477

)

 

Total current liabilities

 

31,541

 

39,468

 

3,248

 

21,778

 

(30,477

)

65,558

 

Deferred income taxes

 

695

 

26,495

 

 

6,834

 

 

34,024

 

Intercompany notes payable

 

 

 

 

1,035

 

(1,035

)

 

Advance payments from sale of San Carlos property

 

 

13,450

 

 

 

 

13,450

 

Long-term debt

 

79,268

 

167,500

 

 

 

 

246,768

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

31

 

Total liabilities

 

111,504

 

246,944

 

3,248

 

29,647

 

(31,512

)

359,831

 

Common stock

 

160

 

 

 

 

 

160

 

Parent investment

 

 

124,306

 

22,228

 

57,237

 

(203,771

)

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

65,009

 

 

 

 

 

65,009

 

Accumulated other comprehensive  income (loss)

 

936

 

(106

)

 

(8

)

114

 

936

 

Retained earnings

 

28,364

 

35,670

 

3,483

 

14,117

 

(54,286

)

27,348

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

94,469

 

159,870

 

25,711

 

71,346

 

(257,943

)

93,453

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

205,973

 

406,814

 

28,959

 

100,993

 

(289,455

)

453,284

 

 

25




 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of September 30, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Non-Guarantor

 

Consolidating

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Parent

 

Issuer

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

33

 

25,528

 

323

 

627

 

 

26,511

 

Restricted cash

 

 

 

1,180

 

107

 

 

1,287

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

21,982

 

5,531

 

11,782

 

 

39,295

 

Inventories

 

 

33,746

 

2,135

 

15,755

 

(1,016

)

50,620

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

12,339

 

7

 

 

 

12,346

 

Prepaid and other current assets

 

165

 

3,930

 

127

 

791

 

(1,032

)

3,981

 

Intercompany receivable

 

 

17,849

 

2,278

 

8,064

 

(28,191

)

 

Total current assets

 

198

 

115,374

 

11,581

 

37,126

 

(30,239

)

134,040

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

72,462

 

3,166

 

7,996

 

 

83,624

 

Deferred debt issue costs, net

 

3,326

 

7,735

 

 

 

 

11,061

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

61,500

 

6,965

 

9,476

 

 

77,941

 

Goodwill

 

 

92,041

 

5,848

 

47,573

 

 

145,462

 

Other long-term assets

 

1,515

 

901

 

 

 

 

2,416

 

Intercompany notes receivable

 

 

7,635

 

 

 

(7,635

)

 

Investment in subsidiaries

 

157,658

 

49,587

 

 

 

(207,245

)

 

Total assets

 

$

162,697

 

407,235

 

27,560

 

102,171

 

(245,119

)

454,544

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

 

13,223

 

368

 

7,830

 

 

21,421

 

Accrued expenses

 

1,320

 

21,610

 

1,078

 

3,239

 

 

27,247

 

Product warranty

 

 

3,698

 

164

 

2,497

 

 

6,359

 

Income taxes payable

 

 

 

11

 

2,567

 

(1,032

)

1,546

 

Advance payments from customers

 

 

4,744

 

1,834

 

5,489

 

 

12,067

 

Intercompany payable

 

28,191

 

 

 

 

(28,191

)

 

Total current liabilities

 

29,511

 

43,275

 

3,455

 

21,622

 

(29,223

)

68,640

 

Deferred income taxes

 

272

 

28,240

 

 

7,044

 

 

35,556

 

Intercompany notes payable

 

 

 

 

7,635

 

(7,635

)

 

Advance payments from sale of San Carlos property

 

 

13,450

 

 

 

 

13,450

 

Long-term debt

 

79,231

 

205,000

 

 

 

 

284,231

 

Total liabilities

 

109,014

 

289,965

 

3,455

 

36,301

 

(36,858

)

401,877

 

Common stock

 

131

 

 

 

 

 

131

 

Parent investment

 

 

95,179

 

22,228

 

57,216

 

(174,623

)

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

34,595

 

 

 

 

 

34,595

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

1,621

 

1,213

 

 

360

 

(1,573

)

1,621

 

Retained earnings

 

17,336

 

20,878

 

1,877

 

8,294

 

(32,065

)

16,320

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

53,683

 

117,270

 

24,105

 

65,870

 

(208,261

)

52,667

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

162,697

 

407,235

 

27,560

 

102,171

 

(245,119

)

454,544

 

 

 

26




 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
 For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Non-
Guarantor

 

Consolidating

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Parent

 

Issuer

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

 Sales

 

$

 

59,103

 

15,958

 

31,036

 

(18,336

)

87,761

 

Cost of sales

 

 

42,091

 

12,994

 

23,925

 

(18,143

)

60,867

 

Gross profit

 

 

17,012

 

2,964

 

7,111

 

(193

)

26,894

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

927

 

 

1,588

 

 

2,515

 

Selling and marketing

 

 

2,206

 

921

 

2,121

 

 

5,248

 

General and administrative

 

 

3,841

 

225

 

1,375

 

 

5,441

 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

 

 

334

 

63

 

151

 

 

548

 

Net loss on disposition of assets

 

 

206

 

2

 

4

 

 

212

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

7,514

 

1,211

 

5,239

 

 

13,964

 

Operating income

 

 

9,498

 

1,753

 

1,872

 

(193

)

12,930

 

Interest expense (income), net

 

2,026

 

3,912

 

(2

)

9

 

 

5,945

 

(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity in income of subsidiaries

 

(2,026

)

5,586

 

1,755

 

1,863

 

(193

)

6,985

 

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

(811

)

2,318

 

504

 

506

 

 

2,517

 

Equity in income of subsidiaries

 

5,683

 

2,608

 

 

 

(8,291

)

 

Net income

 

$

4,468

 

5,876

 

1,251

 

1,357

 

(8,484

)

4,468

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Quarter Ended July 1, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Non-
Guarantor

 

Consolidating

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Parent

 

Issuer

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

Sales

 

$

 

61,172

 

12,679

 

32,818

 

(19,030

)

87,639

 

Cost of sales

 

 

43,244

 

10,214

 

23,420

 

(19,030

)

57,848

 

Gross profit

 

 

17,928

 

2,465

 

9,398

 

 

29,791

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

606

 

 

1,293

 

 

1,899

 

Selling and marketing

 

 

1,852

 

876

 

2,016

 

 

4,744

 

General and administrative

 

 

4,125

 

701

 

938

 

 

5,764

 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

 

 

334

 

63

 

151

 

 

548

 

Net loss on disposition of assets

 

 

21

 

 

4

 

 

25

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

6,938

 

1,640

 

4,402

 

 

12,980

 

Operating income

 

 

10,990

 

825

 

4,996

 

 

16,811

 

Interest expense (income), net

 

1,832

 

3,600

 

(8

)

273

 

 

5,697

 

(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity in loss of subsidiaries

 

(1,832

)

7,390

 

833

 

4,723

 

 

11,114

 

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

(733

)

2,820

 

441

 

1,888

 

 

4,416

 

Equity in income of subsidiaries

 

7,797

 

3,227

 

 

 

(11,024

)

 

Net income

 

$

6,698

 

7,797

 

392

 

2,835

 

(11,024

)

6,698

 

 

27




 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Nine months Ended June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Non-
Guarantor

 

Consolidating

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Parent

 

Issuer

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

Sales

 

$

 

167,686

 

45,000

 

99,992

 

(55,609

)

257,069

 

Cost of sales

 

 

122,617

 

36,936

 

75,191

 

(55,521

)

179,223

 

Gross profit

 

 

45,069

 

8,064

 

24,801

 

(88

)

77,846

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

2,613

 

 

3,753

 

 

6,366

 

Selling and marketing

 

 

6,304

 

2,764

 

5,884

 

 

14,952

 

General and administrative

 

 

10,411

 

959

 

6,049

 

 

17,419

 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

 

 

1,002

 

188

 

452

 

 

1,642

 

Net loss on disposition of assets

 

 

378

 

2

 

40

 

 

420

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

20,708

 

3,913

 

16,178

 

 

40,799

 

Operating income

 

 

24,361

 

4,151

 

8,623

 

(88

)

37,047

 

Interest expense (income), net

 

6,126

 

12,258

 

(11

)

36

 

 

18,409

 

(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity in income of subsidiaries

 

(6,126

)

12,103

 

4,162

 

8,587

 

(88

)

18,638

 

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

(2,451

)

6,097

 

1,200

 

2,764

 

 

7,610

 

Equity in income of subsidiaries

 

14,703

 

8,785

 

 

 

(23,488

)

 

Net income

 

$

11,028

 

14,791

 

2,962

 

5,823

 

(23,576

)

11,028

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Nine months Ended July 1, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Non-
Guarantor

 

Consolidating

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Parent

 

Issuer

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

Sales

 

$

 

174,738

 

33,934

 

88,636

 

(51,473

)

245,835

 

Cost of sales, including $351 of amortization of acquisition-related inventory write-up

 

 

123,035

 

27,858

 

63,843

 

(51,473

)

163,263

 

Gross profit

 

 

51,703

 

6,076

 

24,793

 

 

82,572

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

1,797

 

 

3,408

 

 

5,205

 

Selling and marketing

 

 

5,547

 

2,522

 

5,328

 

 

13,397

 

General and administrative

 

 

10,169

 

1,538

 

3,684

 

 

15,391

 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

 

 

5,751

 

183

 

1,006

 

 

6,940

 

Net loss on disposition of assets

 

 

269

 

 

4

 

 

273

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

23,533

 

4,243

 

13,430

 

 

41,206

 

Operating income

 

 

28,170

 

1,833

 

11,363

 

 

41,366

 

Interest expense (income), net

 

2,643

 

11,044

 

(23

)

845

 

 

14,509

 

(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity in loss of subsidiaries

 

(2,643

)

17,126

 

1,856

 

10,518

 

 

26,857

 

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

(1,057

)

7,151

 

746

 

3,901

 

 

10,741

 

Equity in income of subsidiaries

 

17,702

 

7,727

 

 

 

(25,429

)

 

Net income

 

$

16,116

 

17,702

 

1,110

 

6,617

 

(25,429

)

16,116

 

 

28




 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine months Ended June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Non-
Guarantor

 

Consolidating

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Parent

 

Issuer

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

 

$

(3,409

)

1,285

 

451

 

3,591

 

 

1,918

 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred expenses relating to sale of San Carlos property

 

 

(212

)

 

 

 

(212

)

Capital expenditures

 

 

(6,456

)

(106

)

(1,857

)

 

(8,419

)

Investment in subsidary

 

(47,500

)

47,500

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) investing activities

 

(47,500

)

40,832

 

(106

)

(1,857

)

 

(8,631

)

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

 

52,942

 

 

 

 

 

52,942

 

Proceeds from senior term loan

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

 

10,000

 

Special cash dividends

 

(17,000

)

 

 

 

 

(17,000

)

Repayments on senior term loan

 

 

(47,500

)

 

 

 

(47,500

)

Payment of IPO costs

 

(5,634

)

 

 

 

 

(5,634

)

Intercompany dividends

 

20,959

 

(20,959

)

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

51,267

 

(58,459

)

 

 

 

(7,192

)

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

358

 

(16,342

)

345

 

1,734

 

 

(13,905

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

33

 

25,528

 

323

 

627

 

 

26,511

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

391

 

9,186

 

668

 

2,361

 

 

12,606

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine months Ended July 1, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Non-
Guarantor

 

Consolidating

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

Parent

 

Issuer

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

97

 

13,006

 

553

 

114

 

 

13,770

 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred expenses relating to sale of San Carlos property

 

 

(216

)

 

 

 

(216

)

Purchase of Econco, net of cash acquired

 

 

(18,325

)

 

 

 

(18,325

)

Capital expenditures

 

 

(8,336

)

(132

)

(399

)

 

(8,867

)

Other investing activities

 

 

(16

)

 

 

 

(16

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(26,893

)

(132

)

(399

)

 

(27,424

)

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of floating rate senior notes

 

79,200

 

 

 

 

 

79,200

 

Special cash dividends

 

(75,809

)

 

 

 

 

(75,809

)

Repayments on senior term loan

 

 

(9,550

)

 

 

 

(9,550

)

Payments for debt issue costs

 

(3,455

)

 

 

 

 

(3,455

)

Other financing activities

 

 

(80

)

(20

)

 

 

(100

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(64

)

(9,630

)

(20

)

 

 

(9,714

)

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

33

 

(23,517

)

401

 

(285

)

 

(23,368

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

38,131

 

113

 

2,232

 

 

40,476

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

33

 

14,614

 

514

 

1,947

 

 

17,108

 

 

29




Item 2.                          Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our fiscal years are the 52- or 53-week periods that end on the Friday nearest September 30. Fiscal year 2006 comprises the 52-week period ending September 29, 2006 and fiscal year 2005 comprised the 52-week period ended September 30, 2005. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, of CPI International, Inc.

Overview

CPI International, Inc., headquartered in Palo Alto, California, is the parent company of Communications & Power Industries, Inc., a leading provider of microwave, radio frequency, power and control solutions for critical defense, communications, medical, scientific and other applications.  Communications & Power Industries, Inc. develops, manufactures and distributes products used to generate, amplify and transmit high-power/high-frequency microwave and radio frequency signals and/or provide power and control for various applications.  End-use applications of these systems include the transmission of radar signals for navigation and location; transmission of deception signals for electronic countermeasures; transmission and amplification of voice, data and video signals for broadcasting, Internet and other types of communications; providing power and control for medical diagnostic imaging; and generating microwave energy for radiation therapy in the treatment of cancer and for various industrial and scientific applications.

Unless the context otherwise requires, (1) “CPI International” means CPI International, Inc., (2) “Predecessor” means Communications & Power Industries Holding Corporation, the predecessor to CPI International, (3) “CPI” means Communications & Power Industries, Inc. and (4) “Merger” means the January 23, 2004 merger pursuant to which CPI International acquired the Predecessor. CPI is a direct subsidiary of CPI International. CPI International is a holding company with no operations of its own. The terms “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to CPI International, or the Predecessor, as applicable, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

On May 3, 2006, we completed the initial public offering of our Common Stock, pursuant to which we sold 2,941,200 shares and selling stockholders sold 4,117,670 shares, at an initial offering price to the public of $18.00 per share.  For additional information about the initial public offering of our common stock see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Eimac Relocation

We began the relocation of our Eimac division from our San Carlos, California facility to our nearby Palo Alto, California and Mountain View, California facilities during fiscal year 2005.  We expect to complete the physical relocation and consolidation of operations by the end of calendar year 2006.  As of June 30, 2006, the physical relocation of the Eimac division was complete.  In order to realize increased efficiencies from the relocation of our Eimac division to our Palo Alto and Mountain View facilities, on June 1, 2006, we made organizational changes and consolidated the operating activities of our Eimac division into our Microwave Power Products division, which also operates out of our Palo Alto facility.

As part of this relocation, our Eimac division has experienced planned manufacturing disruptions stemming from the decommissioning of our production equipment in San Carlos and the required reconfiguration, installation and testing of that equipment prior to production readiness in Palo Alto.  During the first nine months of fiscal year 2005, in anticipation of these planned disruptions, customers accelerated the placement of orders with our Eimac division.  As we expected, this order acceleration in fiscal year 2005, and the subsequent acceleration of product shipments, caused a reduction of customers’ demand requirements from our Eimac division during the first nine months of fiscal year 2006, particularly in our medical, communications and industrial markets.  As a result, the relocation negatively impacted our orders and sales for the first nine months of fiscal 2006 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2005, as well as our orders and sales for these periods as compared to our average order and sales rates for the three years prior to the start of the relocation.

30




 

Orders and sales for the Eimac division have begun to recover from the impact of the relocation.  Total sales for our Eimac division were $9.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, increasing from the Eimac division’s total sales of $7.7 million and $7.0 million in the second and first quarters of 2006, respectively.  We expect sales for our Eimac division for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 to be similar to those in the third quarter, as we continue to integrate the operating activities of our Eimac division into our Microwave Power Products division.  We expect sales for our Eimac division for future quarters to be more in line with our average total quarter sales of more than $10 million for that division prior to the start of the relocation.

The following table illustrates the impact of the relocation on our Eimac division, summarizing orders and sales for the Eimac division for the first nine months of fiscal years 2006 and 2005, as compared to the average orders and sales for our Eimac division for the three fiscal years before the relocation began (dollars in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Nine Months

 

First Nine Months

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006 Compared to 

 

2005 Compared to 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Average for First

 

Average for First 

 

 

 

First Nine

 

First Nine

 

for First

 

Nine Months 

 

Nine Months

 

 

 

Months

 

Months

 

Nine Months

 

2002 to 2004

 

2002 to 2004

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2002 to 2004

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

Orders

 

$

28.1

 

$

40.2

 

$

32.8

 

$

(4.7

)

(14

)%

$

7.4

 

23

%

Sales

 

$

24.1

 

$

36.4

 

$

32.3

 

$

(8.2

)

(25

)%

$

4.1

 

13

%

 

The following table illustrates the impact of the relocation on our Eimac division, summarizing our sales for the Eimac division for the third quarters of fiscal years 2006 and 2005, as compared to the average sales for our Eimac division for the third quarters of the three fiscal years before the relocation began (dollars in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Third Quarter 2006

 

Third Quarter 2005

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Compared to Average

 

Compared to Average

 

 

 

Third

 

Third

 

for Third

 

for  Third Quarter

 

for Third Quarter

 

 

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

2002 to 2004 

 

2002 to 2004

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2002 to 2004

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

Sales

 

$

9.6

 

$

14.1

 

$

10.6

 

$

(1.0

)

(9

)%

$

3.5

 

33

%

 

The following table summarizes the estimated unfavorable impact of the relocation on our operating income (dollars in millions):

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months
Ended

 

 

 

June 30,
2006

 

July 1,
2005

 

June 30,
2006

 

July 1,
2005

 

Gross profit: additional expenses related to the relocation, overhead absorption and manufacturing variances due to unusual sales volume, and severance expenses, at our Eimac division

 

$

1.8

 

$

0.2

 

$

5.6

 

$

0.3

 

Selling and marketing: severance expenses

 

0.1

 

 

0.1

 

 

General and administrative: direct expenses for the relocation

 

0.4

 

0.3

 

1.0

 

0.6

 

Net loss on disposition of assets: disposal of equipment no longer needed

 

0.1

 

 

0.1

 

 

Unfavorable impact to operating income

 

$

2.4

 

$

0.5

 

$

6.8

 

$

0.9

 

 

Econco Acquisition

On October 8, 2004, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of Econco Broadcast Service, Inc. of Woodland, California for cash consideration of approximately $18.3 million. Econco is a provider of remanufactured high-power microwave devices, allowing broadcasters and other users of these critical products to extend the life of their devices at a cost that is lower than buying a new device.

31




 

Orders

We sell our products into six end markets: radar, electronic warfare, medical, communications, industrial and scientific.  We track our orders in each of these end markets on a year-to-date basis.

Our customer sales contracts are recorded as orders when we accept written customer purchase orders or contracts.  Customer purchase orders with an undefined delivery schedule, or blanket purchase orders, are not reported as orders until the delivery date is determined.  Our government sales contracts are not reported as orders until we have been notified that the contract has been funded.  Total orders for a fiscal period represent the total dollar amount of customer orders recorded by us during the fiscal period, reduced by the dollar amount of any order cancellations or terminations during the fiscal period.

Our orders by market for the first nine months of fiscal years 2006 and 2005 are summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

July 1, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of Total

 

 

 

of Total

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Amount

 

Orders

 

Amount

 

Orders

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

Radar

 

$

88.6

 

36

%

$

80.9

 

32

%

$

7.7

 

10

%

Electronic Warfare

 

18.4

 

7

%

22.8

 

9

%

(4.4

)

(19)

%

Medical

 

46.9

 

19

%

42.0

 

16

%

4.9

 

12

%

Communications

 

71.7

 

29

%

87.1

 

34

%

(15.4

)

(18)

%

Industrial

 

16.7

 

7

%

17.5

 

7

%

(0.8

)

(5)

%

Scientific

 

3.9

 

2

%

4.5

 

2

%

(0.6

)

(13)

%

Total orders

 

$

246.2

 

100

%

$

254.8

 

100

%

$

(8.6

)

(3)

%

 

Explanations for the order increase or decrease by market for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 are as follows:

·                  Radar:  The increase in radar orders was due to both increased order levels and the timing of order receipts for several programs. The increase in order levels included increases for products that are used on the Aegis program, the LANTIRN navigation and targeting system and various foreign military programs.  These order increases were partially offset by a decrease in foreign military orders for the Patriot missile air defense system due to the timing of order receipts.

·                  Electronic Warfare:  The decrease in electronic warfare orders was primarily due to the timing of order levels on certain programs that did not repeat in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006, including a $4.5 million order recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 for the Advanced Airborne Expendable Decoy, which did not repeat in the first nine months of the current fiscal year, but on which we are expecting follow-on orders within the next six months; a $3.4 million two-year delivery order recorded in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 for the ALQ-187 Electronic Countermeasures System program, which did not repeat in the first nine months of the current fiscal year, but on which we are expecting follow-on orders at lower levels within the next six to twelve months; and orders recorded in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 for a prototype for the Project Sheriff Active Denial System. The decrease in orders was partially offset by an increase in orders for the ALQ-184 Electronic Countermeasures System, the SONATA shipboard Electronic Countermeasures System and various foreign military programs.

·                  Medical:  There was an increase in orders for x-ray generators both from U.S. and international customers in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2005.  This increase was partially offset by a $1.3 million reduction in orders for our Eimac division due to its relocation as discussed above.  The increase in medical orders was primarily due to the continued strong growth in orders for x-ray

32




 

generators, control systems and power supply products used in x-ray imaging systems.  The growth in the medical imaging orders is primarily due to new product introductions, new customers and increases in product penetration with existing customers, including approximately $3.0 million in one-time opportunities in Russia and South America, which may not repeat on a regular basis. In fiscal year 2005 we received a sales contract for approximately $20 million for products used in radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer; approximately one-half of this sales contract was reported as orders in fiscal year 2005, with the balance reported as orders in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006.

·                  Communications:  The decrease in communications orders was primarily attributable to the timing of order receipts.  The relocation of our Eimac division caused an order acceleration of approximately $2.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 and a corresponding decrease of approximately $2.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006.  In addition, $3.1 million in orders for an international customer for vacuum electron device (“VED”) products and $3.7 million in orders for troposcatter communications products for an international customer were received in fiscal year 2005 but are not expected to repeat in fiscal year 2006.  An $11.0 million decrease in orders for GenIV satcom amplifiers also impacted communications orders, as satcom amplifier orders for the GenIV amplifier, primarily for the direct-to-home broadcast market, are cyclical.  Customers in the direct-to-home broadcast market historically have placed large orders for satcom amplifiers when they were expanding their broadcast facilities and then have reduced their orders as those products are deployed.  Therefore, we expect continued demand for our satcom amplifiers for direct-to-home broadcast applications over time, but we believe that orders for these products will decrease for a time before returning to fiscal year 2005 levels. The GenIV amplifier shortfall was partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in new product orders for outdoor unit amplifiers and a $6.0 million increase in millimeter wave amplifiers, which are newer products that are also primarily used for direct-to-home broadcast applications.

·                  Industrial:    The decrease in industrial orders was attributable to a reduction in order receipts at our Eimac division due to its relocation, plus lower demand for power supplies from semiconductor equipment companies.

·                  Scientific:  Orders in the scientific market, our smallest market, are historically one-time projects and can fluctuate significantly from period to period.  The decrease in scientific orders was primarily the result of the timing of a large order that was booked in the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 that was not expected to repeat in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006.

Incoming order levels fluctuate significantly on a quarterly or annual basis, and a particular quarter or year’s order rate may not be indicative of future order levels. In addition, our sales are highly dependent upon manufacturing scheduling and performance and, accordingly, it is not possible to accurately predict when orders will be recognized as sales.

Backlog

As of June 30, 2006, we had an order backlog of $184.8 million compared to an order backlog of $190.6 million as of July 1, 2005.   Based on our historical backlog experience, our backlog as of June 30, 2006 is at the high end of our normalized backlog range of $175 to $185 million.  Our backlog as of July 1, 2005 reflected approximately $10 million for a build-up in direct-to home satcom infrastructure in the U.S. and for several other commercial communication and medical programs, most of which have been shipped as of June 30, 2006. Because our orders for government end-use products generally have much longer terms than our orders for commercial business (which require quicker turn-around), our backlog is primarily composed of government orders.  As a result, we expect that our total backlog will not generally grow at the same rate as our total sales, because the markets where we are expecting higher growth, medical and communications are primarily commercial rather than governmental.

33




 

Backlog represents the cumulative balance, at a given point in time, of recorded customer sales orders that have not yet been shipped or recognized as sales. Backlog is increased when an order is received, and backlog is decreased when we recognize sales. We believe backlog and orders information is helpful to investors because this information may be indicative of future sales results. Although backlog consists of firm orders for which goods and services are yet to be provided, customers can, and sometimes do, terminate or modify these orders. However, historically the amount of modifications and terminations has not been material compared to total contract volume.

Results of Operations

We derive our revenue primarily from the sale of products that are used to generate, amplify and transmit high-power/high-frequency microwave and radio frequency signals and/or provide power and control for various applications. Our products generally have selling prices ranging from $2,000 to $100,000, with certain limited products priced up to $1,000,000.

Cost of goods sold generally includes costs for raw materials, manufacturing costs, including allocation of overhead and other indirect costs, charges for reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, warranty claims and losses on fixed price contracts. Operating expenses generally consist of research and development, selling and marketing and general and administrative expenses.

Quarter Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Quarter Ended July 1, 2005

The following table sets forth our historical results of operations for each of the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

July 1, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Amount

 

of Sales

 

Amount

 

of Sales

 

Sales

 

$

87.8

 

100.0

%

$

87.6

 

100.0

%

Cost of sales

 

60.9

 

69.4

 

57.8

 

66.0

 

Gross profit

 

26.9

 

30.6

 

29.8

 

34.0

 

Research and development

 

2.5

 

2.8

 

1.9

 

2.2

 

Selling and marketing

 

5.2

 

5.9

 

4.7

 

5.4

 

General and administrative

 

5.4

 

6.2

 

5.8

 

6.6

 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles

 

0.5

 

0.6

 

0.5

 

0.6

 

Net loss on disposition of assets

 

0.2

 

0.2

 

 

0.0

 

Operating income

 

12.9

 

14.7

 

16.8

 

19.2

 

Interest expense, net

 

5.9

 

6.7

 

5.7

 

6.5

 

Income before taxes

 

7.0

 

8.0

 

11.1

 

12.7

 

Income tax expense

 

2.5

 

2.8

 

4.4

 

5.0

 

Net income

 

$

4.5

 

5.1

%

$

6.7

 

7.6

%

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EBITDA (a)

 

$

15.3

 

17.4

%

$

19.2

 

21.9

%


(a)   EBITDA represents earnings before provision for income taxes, net interest expense and depreciation and amortization. For the reasons listed below, we believe that GAAP-based financial information for highly leveraged businesses such as ours should be supplemented by EBITDA so that investors better understand our financial performance in connection with their analysis of our business:

                      EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our board of directors and management team to evaluate our operating performance;

                      the Senior Credit Facility (defined below) contains covenants that require us to maintain certain interest expense coverage and leverage ratios that contain EBITDA as a component, and our management team uses EBITDA to monitor compliance with such covenants;

                      EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our management team to make day-to-day operating decisions;

34




 

                      EBITDA facilitates comparisons between our operating results and those of competitors with different capital structures and therefore is a component of the measures used by the management to facilitate internal comparisons to competitors’ results and our industry in general; and

                      the payment of management bonuses is contingent upon, among other things, the satisfaction by us of certain targets that contain EBITDA as a component.

Other companies may define EBITDA differently and, as a result, our measure of EBITDA may not be directly comparable to EBITDA of other companies. Although we use EBITDA as a financial measure to assess the performance of our business, the use of EBITDA is limited because it does not include certain material costs, such as interest and taxes, necessary to operate our business. When analyzing our performance, EBITDA should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income, cash flows from operating activities or other statements of operations or statements of cash flows data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

For a reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income, see Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Sales:   Our sales by market for the third quarter of fiscal years 2006 and 2005 are summarized as follows (dollars millions):

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

July 1, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of Total

 

 

 

of Total

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

Radar

 

$

32.1

 

37

%

$

28.3

 

32

%

$

3.8

 

13

%

Electronic Warfare

 

7.0

 

8

%

8.5

 

10

%

(1.5

)

(18)

%

Medical

 

15.6

 

18

%

13.6

 

15

%

2.0

 

15

%

Communications

 

24.9

 

28

%

29.4

 

34

%

(4.5

)

(15)

%

Industrial

 

6.5

 

7

%

6.2

 

7

%

0.3

 

5

%

Scientific

 

1.7

 

2

%

1.6

 

2

%

0.1

 

6

%

Total sales

 

$

87.8

 

100

%

$

87.6

 

100

%

$

0.2

 

0

%

 

Sales for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 of $87.8 million were $0.2 million higher than sales of $87.6 for the third quarter of fiscal year 2005.  Explanations for the sales increase or decrease by market for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2005 are as follows:

·                  Radar:  The increase in sales to the radar market was primarily due to increased shipments of products for various U.S. government and foreign military programs, including products that are used on the TPQ-37 Firefinder Artillery Locating Radar program, FPS-26 missile-tracking radar system and the HAWK missile system.

·                  Electronic Warfare:  The decrease in sales to the electronic warfare market was primarily due to the timing of shipments for various foreign military programs and a prototype system for the Project Sheriff Active Denial System.  In the third quarter of fiscal year 2005, we made $0.8 million in shipments for various foreign military programs and $0.8 million in shipments for the Project Sheriff Active Denial System.  These shipments did not repeat in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006.

·                  Medical:  The increase in sales in the medical market was primarily due to an increase in shipments of our x-ray generators for international customers.  Sales of our medical imaging and radiation therapy products increased approximately 29% from $10.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2005 to $13.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006.   This increase was partially offset by a $1.1 million reduction in shipments from our Eimac division.

·                  Communications:  The decrease in sales in the communications market was primarily the result of a decrease in shipments of satcom amplifiers for direct-to-home broadcast applications, partially offset by increases in shipments of satcom compact amplifiers.  In

35




 

addition, as expected, the relocation of our Eimac division resulted in a $2.0 million reduction in shipments of communications products.

·                  Industrial:    The increase in industrial sales was primarily due to an increase in demand for amplifiers from various commercial programs and for VEDs for various commercial applications.  This increase was partially offset by a $1.3 million reduction in shipments by our Eimac division due to its relocation.

·                  Scientific:  Sales in the scientific market, our smallest market, are historically one-time projects and can fluctuate significantly from period to period.

Gross Profit: Gross profit of $26.9 million, or 30.6% of sales, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 was $2.9 million lower than the prior year’s level of $29.8 million, or 34.0% of sales. The decrease in gross profit in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2005 was primarily due to: the relocation of our Eimac division, which negatively impacted gross margins by $1.6 million; start-up costs for, and a shift in the mix to newer, lower margin satcom products, which negatively impacted fiscal year 2006 gross margins as compared to fiscal year 2005 by $0.7 million; and $0.9 million due to the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar in fiscal year 2006 and the expiration of a favorable Canadian dollar hedge in March 2006.

After the relocation of our Eimac division is complete, we expect to realize operational savings from the consolidation of production facilities in Palo Alto, California, which we believe will improve our gross profit percentage.

Our satcom operation has developed numerous new products over the past several years. A successful introduction of these new products has resulted in a gradual shift in our backlog to newer products. As we begin to ramp up production of these new products in fiscal year 2006, we are incurring start-up manufacturing costs which are contributing to lower margins in fiscal year 2006 as compared to fiscal year 2005.

Research and Development: Research and development expenses of $2.5 million, or 2.8% of sales, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 increased from $1.9 million, or 2.2% of sales, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. The increase was due to increased spending as we invest for future growth in medical diagnostic imaging products and VED products for the radar, electronic warfare and satellite communication markets.

Selling and Marketing:  Selling and marketing expenses of $5.2 million, or 5.9% of sales, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 increased from $4.7 million, or 5.4% of sales, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. This planned increase in selling and marketing expenses in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 was due to additional selling and marketing expenses to support the growth of our business and increased commissions due to a higher mix of sales in the current quarter through third party representatives than in the prior year.

General and Administrative: General and administrative expenses of $5.4 million, or 6.2% of sales, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 were $0.4 million lower than the $5.8 million, or 6.6% of sales, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. The third quarter of fiscal year 2005 included $0.4 million higher stock-based compensation expense and $0.3 million higher management incentive expense. The third quarter of fiscal year 2006 included $0.4 million of higher unfavorable Canadian currency translation loss due to the weaker U.S. dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar.  The third quarter of fiscal years 2006 and 2005 included $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for moving expenses related to the relocation of our Eimac division.

Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangibles:  Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles was $0.5 million for the third quarter in both fiscal year 2006 and 2005. Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles consists of purchase accounting charges, primarily for technology and other intangible assets. Acquisition-related intangible assets will continue to be amortized over periods of up to 50 years.

 

36




Interest Expense, net: Interest expense, net of $5.9 million, or 6.7% of sales, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 was $0.2 million higher than the $5.7 million, or 6.5% of sales, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. The increase in interest expense in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to higher interest rates on our variable rate Term Loan, partially offset by lower debt levels since the $47.5 million Term Loan prepayment in May 2006.

Income Tax Expense: We recorded income tax expense of $2.5 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 and $4.4 million for the third quarter of 2005. The effective tax rates were approximately 36% and 40% for the third quarter of fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively. Income tax expense for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 includes a $0.2 million discrete tax benefit for true-up adjustments to fiscal year 2005 tax expense related to changes in estimates made as a result of filing the 2005 income tax returns.

Net Income: Net income of $4.5 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 was $2.2 million lower than the third quarter of fiscal year 2005 primarily due to the relocation of our Eimac division; other contributing factors included higher planned spending for research and development and selling and marketing expenses in fiscal year 2006, the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar and the expiration of a favorable Canadian currency hedge in March 2006.  The stronger Canadian dollar and the expiration of the favorable Canadian currency hedge caused an unfavorable after-tax impact on net income of approximately $0.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, as compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. Net income in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 was favorably impacted by lower income tax expense, compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2005.

EBITDA: EBITDA for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 was $15.3 million, a decrease of $3.9 million compared to $19.2 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. The decrease in EBITDA from the third quarter of fiscal year 2005 to the third quarter of 2006 was primarily due to the relocation of our Eimac division; other contributing factors included higher planned spending for research and development and selling and marketing expenses in fiscal year 2006, the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar and the expiration of a favorable Canadian currency hedge in March 2006. The total negative impact of the stronger Canadian dollar and the expiration of the favorable Canadian currency hedge, was approximately $1.5 million on the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2005, with $0.9 million reflected in gross profit, $0.2 million in research and development and selling and marketing expenses, and $0.4 million in general and administrative.

37




Nine months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Nine months Ended July 1, 2005

The following table sets forth our historical results of operations for each of the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

July 1, 2005

 

 

 

Amount

 

Percentage
of Sales

 

Amount

 

Percentage
of Sales

 

Sales

 

$

257.1

 

100.0

%

$

245.8

 

100.0

%

Cost of sales (a)

 

179.2

 

69.7

 

163.3

 

66.4

 

Gross profit

 

77.8

 

30.3

 

82.6

 

33.6

 

Research and development

 

6.4

 

2.5

 

5.2

 

2.1

 

Selling and marketing (a)

 

15.0

 

5.8

 

13.4

 

5.5

 

General and administrative (a)

 

17.4

 

6.8

 

15.4

 

6.3

 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles

 

1.6

 

0.6

 

6.9

 

2.8

 

Net loss on disposition of assets

 

0.4

 

0.2

 

0.3

 

0.1

 

Operating income

 

37.0

 

14.4

 

41.4

 

16.8

 

Interest expense, net

 

18.4

 

7.2

 

14.5

 

5.9

 

Income before taxes

 

18.6

 

7.2

 

26.9

 

10.9

 

Income tax expense

 

7.6

 

3.0

 

10.7

 

4.4

 

Net income

 

$

11.0

 

4.3

%

$

16.1

 

6.6

%

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EBITDA (b)

 

$

43.8

 

17.0

%

$

53.1

 

21.6

%


(a)   The first nine months of fiscal year 2006 include a special bonus expense (see “Special Bonus” below) of $3.25 million, allocated as follows: $0.3 million for cost of sales, $0.2 million for selling and marketing and $2.75 million for general and administrative.

(b)   EBITDA represents earnings before provision for income taxes, net interest expense and depreciation and amortization. For the reasons listed below, we believe that GAAP-based financial information for highly leveraged businesses such as ours should be supplemented by EBITDA so that investors better understand our financial performance in connection with their analysis of our business:

                      EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our board of directors and management team to evaluate our operating performance;

                      the Senior Credit Facility contains covenants that require us to maintain certain interest expense coverage and leverage ratios that contain EBITDA as a component, and our management team uses EBITDA to monitor compliance with such covenants;

                      EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our management team to make day-to-day operating decisions;

                      EBITDA facilitates comparisons between our operating results and those of competitors with different capital structures and therefore is a component of the measures used by the management to facilitate internal comparisons to competitors’ results and our industry in general; and

                      the payment of management bonuses is contingent upon, among other things, the satisfaction by us of certain targets that contain EBITDA as a component.

Other companies may define EBITDA differently and, as a result, our measure of EBITDA may not be directly comparable to EBITDA of other companies. Although we use EBITDA as a financial measure to assess the performance of our business, the use of EBITDA is limited because it does not include certain material costs, such as interest and taxes, necessary to operate our business. When analyzing our performance, EBITDA should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income, cash flows from operating activities or other statements of operations or statements of cash flows data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

For a reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income, see Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

38




Sales:   The following table compares total sales by market for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 to the nine months ended July 1, 2005 (dollars in millions):

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

July 1, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of Total

 

 

 

of Total

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

Radar

 

$

90.2

 

35

%

$

83.9

 

34

%

$

6.3

 

8

%

Electronic Warfare

 

20.0

 

8

%

21.3

 

9

%

(1.3

)

(6)

%

Medical

 

42.8

 

17

%

39.3

 

16

%

3.5

 

9

%

Communications

 

83.6

 

32

%

76.8

 

31

%

6.8

 

9

%

Industrial

 

16.2

 

6

%

18.0

 

7

%

(1.8

)

(10)

%

Scientific

 

4.3

 

2

%

6.5

 

3

%

(2.2

)

(34)

%

Total sales

 

$

257.1

 

100

%

$

245.8

 

100

%

$

11.3

 

5

%

 

Sales for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 of $257.1 million were $11.3 million, or 5%, higher than the comparable period of fiscal year 2005.  Explanations for the sales increase or decrease by market for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 are as follows:

·                  Radar:  The increase in sales to the radar market was primarily due to increased shipments of products for various U.S. government and foreign military programs, including products that are used on the TPQ-37 Firefinder Artillery Radar program and the FPS-26 missile-tracking radar system.

·                  Electronic Warfare:  The decrease in sales to the electronic warfare market was primarily due to $1.6 million of sales for a prototype system in the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 for the Project Sheriff Active Denial System, which did not repeat in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006.

·                  Medical:  The increase in sales to the medical market was primarily due to an increase in shipments of our x-ray generators for U.S. and international customers.  Sales of our medical imaging and radiation therapy products increased approximately 23% from $30.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 to $38.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006.  This increase was partially offset by a $3.6 million reduction in shipments from our Eimac division.

·                  Communications:  The increase in sales to the communications market was primarily the result of an increase in shipments of VEDs for military satellite communications uplink, troposcatter communications products, satellite communications products for foreign customers and commercial millimeter wave amplifiers for direct-to-home broadcast applications.  Our millimeter wave amplifiers are a newer product line, and we are expecting initially lower profit margins on these newer products in comparison to our more established satcom amplifiers for direct-to-home broadcast applications.  Offsetting the sales increase for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006, was a $5.2 million reduction in shipments of communications products due to the relocation of the Eimac facility.

·                  Industrial:    The decrease in sales to the industrial market was primarily due to a $3.3 million reduction in shipments by our Eimac division due to its relocation.

·                  Scientific:  The decrease in sales to the scientific market, our smallest market, was primarily due to the product deliveries on programs for a European laboratory and the Spallation Neutron Source at Oakridge National Laboratory in the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 that did not repeat in the first nine months of 2006.  Sales in the scientific market are historically one-time projects.

39




 

Gross Profit: Gross profit of $77.8 million, or 30.3% of sales, for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 was $4.8 million lower than the prior year’s level of $82.6 million, or 33.6% of sales. The decrease in gross profit for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 was primarily due to: the relocation of our Eimac division, which negatively impacted gross margins by $5.3 million; start-up costs for, and a shift in the mix to newer, lower margin satcom products, which negatively impacted fiscal year 2006 gross margins as compared to fiscal year 2005 by $1.8 million; and $1.1 million due to the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar in fiscal year 2006 and the expiration of a favorable Canadian dollar hedge in March 2006. Offsetting the aforementioned unfavorable impact to gross margin was approximately $3.8 million higher gross margin related primarily to $11.3 million higher sales in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2005.

After the relocation of our Eimac division is complete, we expect to realize operational savings from the consolidation of production facilities in Palo Alto, California, which we believe will improve our gross profit percentage.

Our satcom operation has developed numerous new products over the past several years. A successful introduction of these new products has resulted in a gradual shift in our backlog to newer products. As we begin to ramp up production of these new products in fiscal year 2006, we are incurring start-up manufacturing costs which are contributing to lower margins in fiscal year 2006 as compared to fiscal year 2005.

Research and Development: Research and development expenses of $6.4 million, or 2.5% of sales, for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 increased from $5.2 million, or 2.1% of sales, in the first nine months of fiscal year 2005. The increase was due to increased spending as we invest for future growth in medical diagnostic imaging products and VED products for the radar, electronic warfare and satellite communication markets. Total spending on research and development, including company-sponsored amounts charged to research and development and customer-sponsored amounts charged to cost of sales, increased from $9.9 million, or 4.0% of sales, in the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 to $10.7 million, or 4.2% of sales, in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006.

Selling and Marketing: Selling and marketing expenses of $15.0 million, or 5.8% of sales, for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 increased from $13.4 million, or 5.5% of sales, for the first nine months of fiscal year 2005. This planned increase in selling and marketing expenses in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to additional selling and marketing expenses to support the growth of our business, and $0.2 million for the special bonus, described below.

General and Administrative: General and administrative expenses of $17.4 million, or 6.8% of sales, for the first nine months of the fiscal year 2006 were $2.0 million higher than the $15.4 million, or 6.3% of sales, for the first nine months of fiscal year 2005. The first nine months of fiscal year 2006 included $2.75 million for the special bonus, described below, partially offset by $0.8 million lower stock-based compensation and $0.7 million lower management incentive expenses.  Moving expenses related to the Eimac relocation were $1.0 million and $0.6 million in fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Special Bonus: On December 15, 2005, our board of directors approved the payment of $3.25 million in bonuses to our employees and directors (other than directors who are employees or affiliates of Cypress) to reward them for the increase in company value. The special bonus was charged to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income in the same lines as cash compensation paid to those employees and directors, as follows: $0.3 million to cost of sales, $0.2 million to selling and marketing and $2.75 million to general and administrative.

Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangibles: Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles of $1.6 million for the first nine months of the fiscal year 2006 was $5.3 million lower than the first nine months of fiscal year 2005. Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles consists of purchase accounting charges, primarily for customer backlog, technology and other intangible assets. The first nine months of fiscal year 2005 included $5.3 million for the amortization of customer backlog, which was fully amortized

40




in January 2005. Acquisition-related intangible assets will continue to be amortized over periods of up to 50 years.

Interest Expense, net: Interest expense, net of $18.4 million, or 7.2% of sales, for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 was $3.9 million higher than the $14.5 million, or 5.9% of sales, for the first nine months of fiscal year 2005. The increase in interest expense for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to additional interest expense for the $80 million aggregate principal amount of CPI International’s Floating Rate Senior Notes (“FR Notes”) issued in February 2005 and higher interest rates on our variable rate Term Loan.

Income Tax Expense: We recorded income tax expense of $7.6 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 and $10.7 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2005. The effective tax rates were approximately 41% and 40% for the first nine months of fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively. Income tax expense for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 includes a $0.3 million charge attributable to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, consisting of $0.5 million to correct the overstatement of tax benefits recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 for stock-based compensation expense that is not deductible for income tax purposes in a foreign tax jurisdiction, offset by reversal of a $0.2 million tax contingency reserve that is no longer considered necessary.  Income tax expense for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 also includes a $0.2 million discrete tax benefit for true-up adjustments to fiscal year 2005 tax expense related to changes in estimates made as a result of filing the 2005 income tax returns.

Net Income: Net income of $11.0 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 was $5.1 million lower than the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 primarily due to the impact of the Eimac relocation; other contributing factors included higher interest expense related to higher debt levels and higher interest rates on our Term Loan, the $3.25 million special bonus described above, higher planned spending for research and development and selling and marketing expenses in fiscal year 2006, the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar and the expiration of a favorable Canadian hedge contract in March 2006. The stronger Canadian dollar and the expiration of the favorable Canadian currency hedge caused an unfavorable after-tax impact on net income of approximately $0.9 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2005. Net income for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 was favorably impacted by lower amortization of acquisition-related intangibles and the lower income tax expense, compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2005.

EBITDA: EBITDA for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 was $43.8 million, a decrease of $9.3 million compared to $53.1 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2005. The decrease in EBITDA from the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 compared to the first nine months of 2006 resulted primarily from the impact of the Eimac relocation; other contributing factors included the $3.25 million special bonus described above, higher planned spending for research and development and selling and marketing expenses in fiscal year 2006, the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar and the expiration of the favorable Canadian currency hedge in March 2006. The total negative impact of the stronger Canadian dollar and the expiration of the favorable Canadian currency hedge, was approximately $1.5 million on the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2005, with $1.1 million reflected in gross profit, $0.2 million in research and development and selling and marketing expenses, and $0.2 million in general and administrative.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our liquidity is affected by many factors, some of which are based on normal ongoing operations of our business and others that are related to uncertainties in the markets in which we compete and other global economic factors. We have historically financed, and intend to continue to finance, our capital and working capital requirements including debt service and internal growth, through a combination of cash flows from our operations and borrowings under CPI’s senior credit agreement (the “Senior Credit Facility”), which consists of a $40.0 million revolving commitment, with a sub-facility of $15.0 million for letters of credit

41




 

and $5.0 million for swingline loans (“Revolver”), and a $90.0 million term loan (the “Term Loan”). Our primary uses of cash are cost of sales, operating expenses, debt service and capital expenditures.

As of June 30, 2006, we had no borrowings outstanding and borrowing availability of $35.8 million under the Revolver and $42.5 million outstanding under the Term Loan, after the $47.5 million aggregate Term Loan repayments in May 2006 using proceeds from our initial public offering of CPI International’s common stock (the “IPO”).  Upon certain specified conditions, including compliance on a pro forma basis with the covenants in the Senior Credit Facility, CPI may seek commitments for a new class of term loans, not to exceed $65.0 million. We believe that cash and cash equivalents on hand and cash expected to be generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our currently anticipated cash requirements for the remainder of this fiscal year. Thereafter, our ability to fund our cash requirements and to comply with the financial covenants under our debt agreements will depend on our results of future operations, performance and cash flows and will be subject to uncertainties in the markets in which we compete and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

As of June 30, 2006, we had cash and equivalents of $12.6 million compared to $26.5 million as of September 30, 2005. Cash balances in excess of operating requirements are invested daily in overnight U.S. Government securities.

Operating, Investing and Financing Activities

Operating Activities: Operating activities provided cash of approximately $1.9 million in the first nine months of 2006, which was attributable to net income of $11.0 million, depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges of $7.7 million; partially offset by $16.8 million used by net operating assets and liabilities. The principal uses of net operating assets and liabilities in the first nine months of 2006 were increases in accounts receivable of $8.9 million, inventories of $3.6 million and decreases in advance payments from customers of $6.8 million, partially offset by a $4.2 million increase in income taxes payable.  Operating activities provided cash of approximately $13.8 million in the first nine months of 2005, which was attributable to net income of $16.1 million, depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges of $10.4 million; partially offset by $12.7 million used by net operating assets and liabilities.  The principal uses of net operating assets and liabilities in the first nine months of 2005 were increases in accounts receivable of $11.2 million and inventories of $7.5 million and decreases in advance payments from customers of $4.0 million partially offset by increases in accrued expenses of $5.4 million and income tax payable of $4.2 million.

Investing Activities:   Net cash used in investing activities was $8.6 million for the first nine months of 2006, consisting primarily of $8.4 million for capital expenditures, including $4.4 million for capital equipment, building and land lease improvements in Palo Alto, California related to the relocation of our Eimac division and $1.2 million for a building expansion project at our Canadian facility. Net cash used in investing activities was $27.4 million for the first nine months of 2005, consisting primarily $18.3 million for the purchase price of Econco, $8.9 million for capital expenditures, including $6.8 million for capital equipment, building and land lease improvements related to the Eimac relocation.

Financing Activities:   Net cash used in financing activities was $7.2 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2006, consisting primarily of $37.5 million in net repayments on the Term Loan and a $17.0 million special cash dividend to the holders of CPI International’s common stock in December 2005, partially offset by $47.3 million of net proceeds from our initial public offering of common stock (the “IPO”), after deduction of IPO expenses of $5.6 million.  Net cash used in financing activities was $9.7 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2005, consisting primarily of a $75.8 million special cash dividend to holders of CPI International’s common stock, $9.6 million repayments on the Term Loan, and $3.4 million of debt issue costs incurred to issue the FR Notes, partially offset by $79.2 million of proceeds from the issuance of FR Notes. The Term Loan repayments in the first nine months of fiscal year 2005 included $3.9 million of required annual prepayment and an optional prepayment of $5.7 million.

The Senior Credit Facility requires an annual prepayment to be made within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year based on a calculation of excess cash flow (“ECF”), as defined in the Senior Credit Facility,

42




 

multiplied by a factor of 25%, 50% or 75% depending on the leverage ratio at the end of the fiscal year, less any optional prepayments made during the fiscal year. There was no ECF payment due in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006.

Amendment to Senior Credit Facility

On December 15, 2005, CPI International and CPI entered into Amendment No. 3 (the “Amendment”), to the Senior Credit Facility. The Amendment increased the commitments under the Term Loan by $10 million, and CPI borrowed an additional $10 million thereunder. In addition, among other things, the Amendment (1) permitted CPI to pay a dividend (not to exceed $20 million) to CPI International to fund a dividend by CPI International to its stockholders, (2) amended the definition of Excess Cash Flow in the Senior Credit Facility to decrease Excess Cash Flow for CPI’s fiscal year 2006 by the excess of the amount of the dividend described in clause (1) over the gross proceeds of the $10 million additional borrowing, and (3) permitted CPI or CPI International to use up to $70 million of the proceeds of the IPO to repurchase or redeem the FR Notes or CPI’s 8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 (the “8% Notes”).

San Carlos Sale Agreement

In February 2003, we entered into an agreement to sell the land and close our facilities located in San Carlos, California. The purchase price is $23.8 million. Under the sale agreement, the buyer has paid us a $13.0 million deposit on the purchase price, which was used to fund the capital expenditures and costs of moving our San Carlos operations to our Palo Alto facility and Mountain View facilities. The $13.0 million deposit is nonrefundable unless we breach the sale agreement.

The closing of the sale is subject to a number of conditions, including the requirement that we vacate our facilities and obtain regulatory closure of certain permitted equipment located on the property. Although there can be no assurance that the sale of the San Carlos property will occur, we expect to close the sale of the property in calendar year 2006.

Pursuant to the stock sale agreement by and between Varian Associates, Inc., the predecessor of Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (“Varian”), and the Company dated June 9, 1995, as amended, the Company  agreed to certain development restrictions affecting the San Carlos property. In connection with the San Carlos property sale agreement, Varian agreed to waive certain of the development restrictions on the San Carlos property in the event that the sale closes, subject to certain conditions, and further agreed to pay the Company $1.0 million, of which $0.5 million was paid in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004. The payments from Varian are being accounted for as part of the sale of the property, with the aggregate sales price, including the $23.8 million from the buyer, totaling $24.8 million.

As of June 30, 2006, the San Carlos land and building was classified as held for use in property, plant and equipment, and the advance payments from the sale of the property, aggregating $13.5 million, are classified as a long-term liability in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2006, we had capitalized recoverable selling costs of $0.9 million relating to the sale of the San Carlos property and classified these amounts as Other long-term assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2006, the San Carlos land and building had a net book value of $23.4 million and the building continues to be depreciated over its remaining useful life. Based on current projections, we do not expect to recognize a loss on the sale of the San Carlos property.

Capital Expenditures

Our continuing operations typically do not have large recurring capital expenditure requirements. Capital expenditures are generally made to replace existing assets, increase productivity, facilitate cost reductions or meet regulatory requirements. We expect the relocation of the San Carlos operations to be completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. Total capital expenditures for fiscal year 2006 are expected to be approximately $13 million, including approximately $5 million for the relocation of the San Carlos operations, $4 million for the expansion of the Canadian facility to accommodate its expected growth and $4 million for ongoing capital expenditures. In fiscal year 2007, ongoing capital expenditures,

43




 

excluding expenditures of approximately $3 million for completion of the Canadian facility expansion, are expected to be approximately $5 million.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accountings Standards (“SFAS”) No. 151, “Inventory Costs — an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4”, which is the result of the FASB’s project to reduce differences between U.S. and international accounting standards. SFAS No. 151 requires idle facility costs, abnormal freight, handling costs, and amounts of wasted materials (spoilage) to be treated as current-period costs. Under this concept, if the costs associated with the actual level of spoilage or production defects are greater than the costs associated with the range of normal spoilage or defects, then the difference would be charged to current-period expense, and not included in inventory costs. We adopted SFAS No. 151 in the beginning of fiscal year 2006 and its adoption did not have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,” which clarifies that an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value can be reasonably estimated even though uncertainty exists about the timing and (or) method of settlement. We are required to adopt Interpretation No. 47 by the end of fiscal year 2006. We do not expect the implementation of Interpretation No. 47 to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS No. 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statement,” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. We are required to adopt SFAS No. 154 for accounting changes and error corrections in fiscal year 2007. Our results of operations and financial condition will only be impacted by SFAS No. 154 if we implement changes in accounting principle that are addressed by the standard or correct accounting errors in future periods.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments.” SFAS No. 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. As of June 30, 2006, we did not have any hybrid financial instruments subject to the fair value election under SFAS No. 155. We are required to adopt SFAS No. 155 at the beginning of fiscal year 2007.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment to FASB Statement No. 140.” SFAS No. 156 amends FASB Statement No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets,” with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. We are required to adopt SFAS No. 156 at the beginning of fiscal year 2007 and as of June 30, 2006, we did not have any servicing assets or servicing liabilities.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, which supplements SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” by defining the confidence level that a tax position must meet in order to be recognized in the financial statements. The Interpretation requires that the tax effects of a position be recognized only if it is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained based solely on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The more-likely-than-not threshold represents a positive assertion by management that a company is entitled to the economic benefits of a tax position. If a tax position is not considered more-likely-than-not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits, no benefits of the position are to be recognized.

Moreover, the more-likely-than-not threshold must continue to be met in each reporting period to support continued recognition of a benefit. At adoption, companies must adjust their financial statements to reflect only those tax positions that are more-likely-than-not to be sustained as of the adoption date. Any necessary adjustment would be recorded directly to retained earnings in the period of adoption and reported as a change in accounting principle. This Interpretation is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year

44




 

beginning after December 15, 2006. We are required to adopt Interpretation No. 48 at the beginning of fiscal year 2008 and management is assessing the potential impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies. The preparation of these financial statements and application of these policies requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. However, we are not currently aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances that would result in materially different results from current estimates.

We believe the following critical accounting policies are the most significant to the presentation of our financial statements and require the most subjective and complex judgments. These matters, and the judgments and uncertainties affecting them, are also essential to understanding our reported and future operating results. For a more comprehensive discussion of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005.

Revenue recognition:   We generally recognize revenue upon shipment of product, following receipt of written purchase orders, when the price is fixed or determinable, title has transferred, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Approximately 1% of our sales during fiscal year 2005 were based on the percentage of completion method of accounting, and we expect a similar portion in fiscal year 2006. Sales on percentage of completion contracts are determined on the basis of costs incurred and estimates of costs at completion, which require management estimates of future costs. Changes in estimated costs at completion over time could have a material impact on our operating results.

Inventory reserves:   We assess the valuation of inventory and periodically write down the value for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based upon actual usage and estimates about future demand. The excess balance determined by this analysis becomes the basis for our excess inventory charge. Management personnel play a key role in our excess inventory review process by providing updated sales forecasts, managing product rollovers and working with manufacturing to maximize recovery of excess inventory. If our estimates regarding demand are inaccurate or changes in technology affect demand for certain products in an unforeseen manner, we may incur losses or gains in excess of our established markdown reserve that could be material.

Management also reviews the carrying value of inventory for lower of cost or market on an individual product or contract basis. A loss reserve is charged to cost of sales if the estimated product cost or the contract cost at completion is in excess of net realizable value (selling price less estimated cost of disposal). If the actual contract cost at completion is different than originally estimated, then a loss or gain provision adjustment would be recorded that could have a material impact on our operating results.

Product warranty:   Our products are generally warranted for a variety of periods, typically one to three years or a predetermined product usage life. A provision for estimated future costs of repair, replacement or customer accommodations is reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. We assess the adequacy of our preexisting warranty liabilities and adjust the balance based on actual experience and changes in future expectations. The determination of product warranty reserves requires us to make estimates of product return rates and expected cost to repair or replace the products under warranty. If actual repair and replacement costs differ significantly from our estimates, then adjustments to recognize additional cost of sales may be required.

Business combination:   In January 2004, as a result of the Merger, assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the successor company were adjusted to reflect fair value, and the excess of the purchase price over the fair value was recorded as goodwill. We recorded goodwill of $140 million as a result of the Merger. Accounting for business combinations requires the allocation of purchase price to identifiable

45




 

tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their fair value. The allocation of purchase price is a matter of judgment and requires the use of estimates and fair value assumptions. The allocation of purchase price to finite-lived assets can have a significant impact on operating results because finite-lived assets are depreciated or amortized over their remaining useful lives.

Recoverability of long-lived assets:   We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level (our six divisions) based on a two-step approach. First, the carrying amount of the reporting unit is compared to the fair value as estimated by the future net discounted cash flows expected to be generated by the reporting unit. To the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, a second step is performed, wherein the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities are valued. The implied fair value of goodwill is calculated as the fair value of the reporting unit in excess of the fair value of all non-goodwill assets and liabilities allocated to the reporting unit. To the extent the reporting unit’s carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, impairment exists and must be recognized. This process requires the use of discounted cash flow models that utilize estimates of future revenue and expenses as well as the selection of appropriate discount rates. There is inherent uncertainty in these estimates, and changes in these factors over time could result in an impairment charge.

At June 30, 2006, the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets, net was approximately $222 million and no significant changes in the underlying business assumptions or circumstances that drive the impairment analysis led us to believe that goodwill might have been impaired.  We will continue to evaluate the need for impairment if changes in circumstances or available information indicate that impairment may have occurred, and at least annually in the fourth quarter.

At June 30, 2006, the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment was approximately $87 million.  We assess the recoverability of property, plant and equipment to be held and used by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or group of assets.  If such assets are considered impaired, then the impairment recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.  This process requires the use of cash flow models that utilize estimates of future revenue and expenses.  There is inherent uncertainty in these estimates, and changes in these factors over time could result in an impairment charge.

A prolonged general economic downturn and, specifically, a prolonged downturn in the defense, communications or medical markets, or technological changes, as well as other market factors could intensify competitive pricing pressure, create an imbalance of industry supply and demand, or otherwise diminish volumes or profits. Such events, combined with changes in interest rates, could adversely affect our estimates of future net cash flows to be generated by our long-lived assets. Consequently, it is possible that our future operating results could be materially and adversely affected by additional impairment charges related to the recoverability of our long-lived assets.

Accounting for stock-based compensation:   At the beginning of fiscal year 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the prospective application method and began accounting for its stock-based compensation using a fair-value based recognition method. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair-value of the award and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award. Determining the appropriate fair-value model and calculating the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires considerable judgment, including estimating stock price volatility, expected option life and forfeiture rates. We develop our estimates based on historical data and market information which can change significantly over time. A small change in the estimates used can have a relatively large change in the estimated valuation.

We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to value employee stock awards. Since our common stock has not been publicly traded for a sufficient time period, we estimate stock price volatility based on

46




 

the expected volatilities of similar companies that have a longer history of being publicly traded.  The expected life of options granted is based on the simplified method for plain vanilla options in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107. The estimated forfeiture rate assumptions are based on historical data. For stock based compensation awards with graded vesting that were granted after fiscal year 2005, we recognizes compensation expense using the straight-line amortization method.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk:   Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our long-term debt and our investment in overnight government securities.

We have variable rate debt that comprises a $90.0 million term loan due in 2010 under our Senior Credit Facility and $80.0 million in FR Notes. Our variable rate debt is subject to changes in the prime rate and the LIBOR rate. We entered into an interest rate swap contract (the “Swap”) with a notional amount of $80 million to effectively convert the FR Notes to a fixed rate of 9.9% through the Swap maturity date in January 2008. We also have $125.0 million of fixed rate 8% Notes.  At June 30, 2006, the fair value of the unrealized gain on the Swap was $1.7 million.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk:   Although the majority of our revenue and expense activities are transacted in U.S. dollars, we do transact business in foreign countries. Our primary foreign currency cash flows are in Canada and several European countries. We have limited market risk exposure from foreign currency financial instruments. As of June 30, 2006, we had entered into Canadian dollar forward contracts for approximately $19.5 million (Canadian dollars), or 50% of estimated Canadian dollar denominated expenses over the next nine months, at an average rate of approximately $0.90 U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar. We estimate the impact of a one cent change in the U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar exchange rate to be approximately $0.5 million annually to operating income.

In an effort to reduce our foreign currency exposure to Canadian dollar denominated expenses, we enter into Canadian dollar forward contracts to hedge the Canadian dollar denominated costs for our manufacturing operation in Canada. Net income includes recognized gains from foreign currency forward contracts of $0.3 million for the third quarter in both fiscal year 2006 and 2005. Net income includes recognized gains from foreign currency forward contracts of $1.2 million and $1.0 million for the first nine months of fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to the information generated for use in this report. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurances that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

47




Part II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.                          Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A.                 Risk Factors

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors. The information presented below updates and should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and information disclosed in that Form 10-K.  We have not made any material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.

 

Our anti-takeover provisions could prevent or delay a change in control of our company, even if such change of control would be beneficial to our stockholders.

 

Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws as well as provisions of Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of our company. These provisions include:

 

·                  a board of directors that is classified such that only one-third of directors are elected each year;

·                  authorizing the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that could be issued by our board of directors to increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover attempt;

·                  limitations on the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;

·                  prohibiting stockholder action by written consent and requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;

·                  establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings; and

·                  requiring that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two thirds (66 2/3%) of the voting power of our issued and outstanding capital stock entitled to vote in the election of directors be obtained to amend certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

 

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which will apply to us after Cypress ceases to own at least 15% of the total voting power of our common stock, limits business combination transactions with 15% stockholders that have not been approved by the board of directors. These provisions and other similar provisions make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without negotiation. These provisions may apply even if the transaction may be considered beneficial by some stockholders.

 

The controlling position of Cypress will limit your ability to influence corporate matters.

 

As of August 7, 2006, entities affiliated with The Cypress Group collectively own over 55% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, the entities affiliated with Cypress have significant influence over our management and affairs and over most matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions. The entities affiliated with Cypress will also be able to deter any attempted change of control. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may take actions that some of our stockholders do not view as beneficial. Accordingly, the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

 

48




 

Item 2.                          Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On May 3, 2006, the Company issued a total of 9,999 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, to certain of its directors, as set forth below.  Such shares of Common Stock were issued to such persons in connection with and in consideration for their service as directors of the Company in a transaction that did not involve any public offering and was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Name of Director

 

 

 

Number of Shares Issued

 

 

 

 

 

Michael F. Finley

 

3,333

 

 

 

 

 

Jeffrey P. Hughes

 

1,111

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Targoff

 

2,222

 

 

 

 

 

Chris Toffales

 

1,111

 

 

 

 

 

William P. Rutledge

 

2,222

 

 

The Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No 333-130662) relating to the sale of up to 8,117,701 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, by the Company and certain selling stockholders in the initial public offering of the Company’s Common Stock was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2006.  The aggregate price of the offering amount registered was $146,118,618 based on an $18.00 per share price.

 

The offering of the Company’s Common Stock commenced on April 27, 2006 and the offering of 7,058,870 shares was completed on May 3, 2006.  The initial offering price was $18.00 per share and the price received by the Company and selling stockholders was $16.74 per share, after deducting commissions (but not other expenses).  UBS Investment Bank, Bear, Stearns & Co Inc., Wachovia Securities and Banc of America Securities LLC served as underwriters of the offering. Of the total shares sold on May 3, 2006: (i) 4,117,670 shares were sold on behalf of the selling stockholders, for an aggregate offering price of $74,118,060 (before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions); and (ii) 2,941,200 shares were sold on the Company’s behalf, for an aggregate offering price of $52,941,600 (before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions).

 

Costs incurred by the Company in connection with the issuance and distribution of securities registered were as follows:

 

·                  Underwriting discounts and commissions—approximately $3.7 million

·                  Other expenses—approximately $1.9 million

·                  Total expenses— approximately $5.6 million

 

None of the expenses, discounts or commissions described above were paid (directly or indirectly) to directors or officers of the Company or their associates or to persons owning 10% or more of any class of equity securities of the Company or to any of the Company’s affiliates.  The net offering proceeds to the Company after deducting the total expenses described above were approximately $47.3 million.

 

The Company used all of the net proceeds from the initial public offering to repay amounts outstanding under the term loan under the Company’s senior credit facility. None of the net proceeds received by the Company were paid (directly or indirectly) to directors or officers of the Company or their associates or to persons owning 10% or more of any class of equity securities of the Company or to any of the Company’s affiliates.

49




 

Item 3.                          Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.                          Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Prior to the completion of the Company’s initial public offering, the Company submitted to its stockholders for approval by written consent (1) the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, (2) the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, (3) the Company’s 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan and (4) the Company’s 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  The Company received written consents approving the foregoing matters from the holders of 4,275,566 shares of common stock of the Company (representing all of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the date of submission of such matters to the stockholders for approval prior to giving effect to the 3.059 to 1 common stock split on April 7, 2006), and such matters were approved on April 6, 2006.

Item 5.                          Other Information

None.

Item 6.                          Exhibits

No.

 

Description

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certifications of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

50




 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

CPI INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: August 14, 2006

 

/s/ O. Joe Caldarelli

 

 

 

O. Joe Caldarelli
Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: August 14, 2006

 

/s/ Joel A. Littman

 

 

 

Joel A. Littman
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

 

 

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

51