Filed Pursuant to Rule
425
Filing Person: SL Green Realty Corp.
Subject Company: Reckson Associates Realty Corp.
Commission File Number: 1-13762
FINAL TRANSCRIPT
EXCERPTS FROM
Conference Call Transcript
SLG - SL Green Realty Corp 2006 Investor Day
Event Date/Time: Dec. 04. 2006 / 1:15PM ET
CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS
Stephen Green
SL Green Realty Corp - Chairman
John Snow
Former Secretary of the Treasury
Michelle LeRoy
SL Green Realty Corporation - VP IR
Marc Holliday
SL Green Realty Corporation - President and CEO
Andrew Mathias
SL Green Realty Corp. - CIO
Steve Durels
SL Green Realty - EVP, Director of Leasing
Ed Piccinich
SL Green Realty - EVP, Director of Property
Greg Hughes
SL Green Realty - CFO
PRESENTATION
* * *
Marc Holliday - SL Green Realty Corporation - President and CEO
* * *
Before I turn it over I just would like to respond to a question that I assume one or two people have out there. Obviously the entering into the merger agreement with Reckson was both a major undertaking and a highlight for this company.
To stand here and tell you otherwise would not be genuine. But one the emotional aspect of this deal is behind you, and trust me, we got past the emotions very quickly, all thats left is a business opportunity and an asset trade. And that is how we look at this right now. You know well enough to know that we dont chase deals that dont make sense, we dont get into bidding wars. I think tell of that, more telling than Reckson, of the $1 billion we acquired this year, there was about $18 billion of other transactions, $20 some odd billion of other transactions that we saw, anyone of which we would loved to have acquired ourselves and we passed on.
We bought a billion, we passed on 19 plus, whatever the number is. Thats more staggering in terms of evaluating our approach to doing the business, knowing when the price is right and when its not and getting past the emotion and the ego of trying to win a bid. We pride ourselves in doing a deal that we think makes sense so that is why we stated last week that we would not increase or match the offer that was put on the table by the competing bidder.
And this is based on our conclusion of many months of diligence and investigation of these properties, we signed the agreement recall back in August, so we just dont believe that the value is there to support the competing bid. And I think the withdrawal of Mack-Cali and Harry Macklowe validates our position on that. Weve done a deal with Reckson that we are confident is the right deal for Reckson shareholders and we hope to move things to a quick conclusion. Were in a very good position, which ever way this deal turns out, and I think thats the most important take away.
2
We are very comfortable with where we stand now. Weve just done two wonderful transactions this morning thatll contribute to our long-term growth over time. We have more in the pipeline. Its more important to us to do good deals than just do deals and being in our position I really do appreciate, I think its a win/win and I think youll come to that same conclusion hopefully, whichever regardless the way that this turns out.
And were working 24/7 on the deal just to be prepared to respond to situations as they break, its a very fast moving situation. So in addition to everything else including the preparation for this presentation today, which was also a monumental event, we just want you to know we are on top of things, were fairly lucid in the way we evaluate this situation and however it goes were in great shape. And thats really all I can say on that topic.
* * *
QUESTION AND ANSWER
* * *
Unidentified Audience Member
Marc, you had said earlier with respect to Reckson that, I want to get this right, you would not increase or match the offer. Was the use of the word increase ?
Marc Holliday - SL Green Realty Corporation - President and CEO
Increase or match the?
Unidentified Audience Member
Well you used the word increase and then you said or to match.
Marc Holliday - SL Green Realty Corporation - President and CEO
I think everyones trying to read a little too much into what Im saying and Im usually very clear with it. I got notes throughout the I think the press has already botched it along the way, its very simple. Theres a $49 bid on the table, were not going to increase or offer to match or exceed that bid, period. Theres no other way I can put it, I think thats clear, and if its not I will clarify it follow-up.
But were just not that offer at $49 is beyond where we see value. Were not going to match it, were not going to increase. I mean obviously if the stock price rises on its own, every our stock price goes up the value of our offer goes up a little bit more, thats out of our control. But whats in our control is an increase in that offer to match Icahns bid or worse yet to get into a bidding war, were not going to do that, thats what weve said.
In terms of what our strategy is, we would never enter into a dialog about what we will and wont do in that regard. We feel very comfortable with where we are now, we have responses for any situation that we think arises over the next several days, we think were in a position to try and conclude this transaction and we think we have a very good handle on what these properties are worth, what this companys worth and were going to proceed accordingly.
So this isnt a forum for me to go into what are those options and how are we going to respond, but there was a very simple specific statement we made last week and I reiterated today, and thats it. So I can expand .
Unidentified Audience Member
No thats clear.
* * *
3
DISCLAIMER
Thomson Financial reserves the right to make changes to documents, content, or other information on this web site without obligation to notify any person of such changes.
In the conference calls upon which Event Transcripts are based, companies may make projections or other forward-looking statements regarding a variety of items. Such forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those stated in any forward-looking statement based on a number of important factors and risks, which are more specifically identified in the companies most recent SEC filings. Although the companies mayindicate and believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate or incorrect and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the results contemplated in the forward-looking statements will be realized.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN EVENT TRANSCRIPTS IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANYS CONFERENCE CALL AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CONFERENCE CALLS. IN NO WAY DOES THOMSON FINANCIAL OR THE APPLICABLE COMPANY OR THE APPLICABLE COMPANY ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY EVENT TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANYS CONFERENCE CALL ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANYS SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.
© 2005, Thomson StreetEvents All Rights Reserved.
4