UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.              )

April 16, 2007

Dear Stockholder:

You are invited to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of SL Green Realty Corp. This year’s meeting will be held on Thursday, May 24, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the Grand Hyatt New York Hotel, Park Avenue at Grand Central Terminal, 109 East 42nd Street, New York, New York.

The attached proxy statement, with the accompanying formal notice of the meeting, describes the matters expected to be acted upon at the meeting. We urge you to review these materials carefully and to take part in the affairs of our company by voting on the matters described in the accompanying proxy statement. We hope that you will be able to attend the meeting. Our directors and management team will be available to answer questions. Afterwards, there will be a vote on the matters set forth in the accompanying proxy statement.

Your vote is important. Whether you plan to attend the meeting or not, please complete the enclosed proxy card and return it as promptly as possible. If you attend the meeting, you may continue to have your shares of common stock voted as instructed in the proxy or you may withdraw your proxy at the meeting and vote your shares of common stock in person. We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

Sincerely,

Stephen L. Green

Chairman of the Board

SL GREEN REALTY CORP.
420 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York  10170-1881

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

to be held on May 24, 2007

The 2007 annual meeting of stockholders of SL Green Realty Corp. will be held on Thursday, May 24, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., local time, the Grand Hyatt New York Hotel, Park Avenue at Grand Central Terminal, 109 East 42nd Street, New York, New York. At the annual meeting, stockholders will vote upon the following proposals:

1.     To elect one Class I director to serve until the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is duly elected and qualified;

2.     To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007;

3.     To authorize and approve our amended and restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan in order to increase the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to such plan;

4.     To authorize and approve articles of amendment and restatement of our Articles of Incorporation in order to (i) increase the number of authorized shares of common stock and (ii) make various ministerial changes to our current Articles of Incorporation; and

5.     To consider and act upon any other matters that may properly be brought before the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Any action may be taken on the foregoing matters at the annual meeting on the date specified above, or on any date or dates to which, by original or later adjournment, the annual meeting may be adjourned, or to which the annual meeting may be postponed.

Our Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 20, 2007 as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. Only stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available at the annual meeting and for ten calendar days prior to the annual meeting, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., local time, at our corporate offices located at 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York  10170-1881. You may arrange to review this list by contacting our Secretary, Andrew S. Levine.

You are requested to fill in and sign the enclosed form of proxy, which is being solicited by our Board of Directors, and to mail it promptly in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope. Any proxy may be revoked by delivery of a later dated proxy. In addition, stockholders of record who attend the annual meeting may vote in person, even if they have previously delivered a signed proxy.

New York, New York
April 16, 2007

Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-prepaid envelope provided. For specific instructions on voting, please refer to the instructions on the proxy card or the information forwarded by your broker, bank or other holder of record. If you attend the annual meeting, you may vote in person if you wish, even if you have previously signed and returned your proxy card. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote in person at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from such broker, bank or other nominee.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

ii

SL GREEN REALTY CORP.

420 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10170-1881

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR 2007 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

to be held on May 24, 2007

We are sending this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card to our stockholders on or about April 16, 2007 in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of SL Green Realty Corp. for use at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Thursday, May 24, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., local time, the Grand Hyatt New York Hotel, Park Avenue at Grand Central Terminal, 109 East 42nd Street, New York, New York, or at any postponement or adjournment of the meeting.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?

If our records show that you were a stockholder of our common stock at the close of business on March 20, 2007, which is referred to in this proxy statement as the record date, you are entitled to receive notice of the meeting and to vote the shares of common stock that you held on the record date. Each outstanding share of common stock entitles its holder to cast one vote for each matter to be voted upon.

What is the purpose of the meeting?

At the annual meeting, you will be asked:

·       to vote upon the election of one Class I director;

·       to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007;

·       to authorize and approve our amended and restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the plan;

·       to authorize and approve articles of amendment and restatement of our Articles of Incorporation in order to (i) increase the number of authorized shares of common stock and (ii) make various ministerial changes to our current Articles of Incorporation; and

·       to consider and act upon any other matters that may properly be brought before the meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of the total number of outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at this meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting. As of the record date, there were 59,180,818 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting.

1

What vote is needed to approve each proposal?

The affirmative vote of the holders of record of a plurality of all of the votes cast at the meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary for the election of the Class I director. The affirmative vote of the holders of record of a majority of all of the votes cast at the meeting at which a quorum is present is required for the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm, approval of our amended and restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and the approval of any other matters properly presented at the meeting for stockholder approval. The affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the outstanding shares of our common stock is necessary to approve the proposed articles of amendment and restatement of our Articles of Incorporation. We will treat abstentions as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. With respect to the proposal to amend and restate our Articles of Incorporation, abstentions will have the effect of a vote cast “against” the proposal. With respect to the other proposals, abstentions do not constitute a vote “for” or “against,” will not be counted as “votes cast” and will have no effect on such proposals. Broker “non-votes,” or proxies from brokers or nominees indicating that such broker or nominee has not received instructions from the beneficial owner or other entity entitled to vote such shares on a particular matter with respect to which such broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power, will be treated in the same manner as abstentions for purposes of the annual meeting. None of the proposals, if approved, entitle stockholders to appraisal rights under Maryland law or our Articles of Incorporation.

Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy card?

If you cast a vote by proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is voted by:

·       filing a written notice revoking the proxy with our Secretary at our address;

·       signing and forwarding to us a proxy with a later date; or

·       appearing in person and voting by ballot at the meeting.

If you attend the meeting, you may vote in person whether or not you have previously given a proxy, but your presence (without further action) at the meeting will not constitute revocation of a previously given proxy.

How do I vote?

We request that you complete, sign, date and promptly return the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope. You may also attend the meeting in person and vote in person. If your shares of common stock are held by a broker, bank or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”), you will receive instructions from your nominee, which you must follow in order to have your shares of common stock voted. Such stockholders who wish to vote in person at the meeting will need to obtain a proxy form from the broker, bank or other nominee that holds their shares of common stock of record.

How is my vote counted?

If you properly execute a proxy in the accompanying form, and if we receive it prior to voting at the meeting, the shares of common stock that the proxy represents will be voted in the manner specified on the proxy. If no specification is made, the common stock will be voted “for” the election of the nominee for the Class I director named in this proxy statement, “for” ratification of our Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, “for” approval of our amended and restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, “for” approval of the proposed articles of amendment and restatement of our Articles of Incorporation and as recommended by our Board of Directors with regard to all other matters in its discretion. It is not anticipated that any matters other than those set forth in the proxy statement will be presented at the

2

meeting. If other matters are presented, proxies will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders. In addition, no stockholder proposals or nominations were received on a timely basis, so no such matters may be brought to a vote at the annual meeting.

What other information should I review before voting?

For your review, our 2006 annual report, including financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, is being mailed to you concurrently with the mailing of this proxy statement. You may also obtain, free of charge, a copy of our 2006 annual report on our website at http://www.slgreen.com. The information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC. You may also obtain a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains additional information about our company, free of charge, by directing your request in writing to SL Green Realty Corp., 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York  10170-1881, Attention:  Investor Relations. The 2006 annual report and the Annual Report on Form 10-K, however, are not part of the proxy solicitation material.

Who is soliciting my proxy?

This solicitation of proxies is made by and on behalf of our Board of Directors. We will pay the cost of the solicitation of proxies. We have retained Morrow & Co., Inc. at an aggregate estimated cost of $5,500, plus out-of-pocket expenses, to assist in the solicitation of proxies. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally or by telephone.

No person is authorized on our behalf to give any information or to make any representations with respect to the proposals other than the information and the representations contained in this proxy statement, and, if given or made, such information and/or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized and the delivery of this proxy statement shall, under no circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in our affairs since the date hereof.

3

PROPOSAL 1:  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors currently consists of five members and is divided into three classes, with the directors in each class serving for a term of three years and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The term of one class expires at each annual meeting of stockholders.

At the annual meeting, one director will be elected to serve until the 2010 annual meeting and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended Edwin Thomas Burton, III to our Board of Directors as a nominee for election to serve as a Class I director. This nominee is currently serving as a Class I director. Following the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board has nominated Edwin Thomas Burton, III to serve as a Class I director. Our Board anticipates that the nominee will serve, if elected, as a director. However, if the nominee is unable to accept election, proxies voted in favor of the nominee will be voted for the election of such other person or persons as our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may recommend to our Board.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the Nominee.

Information Regarding the Nominee and the Continuing Directors

The following table and biographical descriptions set forth certain information with respect to the nominee for election as a Class I director at the 2007 annual meeting and the continuing directors whose terms expire at the annual meetings of stockholders in 2008 and 2009, respectively, based upon information furnished by each director.

Class I Nominee Director—Term Expires 2010

Edwin Thomas Burton, III has served as one of our directors since 1997 and serves as Chairman of our Audit Committee, and is a member of our Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Burton is a member of, and from 1997 until March 2001 served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of, the Investment Advisory Committee of the Virginia Retirement System for state and local employees of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Mr. Burton served as the Chairman of the Virginia Retirement System Special Committee on the sale of RF&P Corporation, a $570 million real estate company. Since 1988, he has served as a professor of economics at the University of Virginia. Mr. Burton served as a director of Virginia National Bank from 1998 until 2004. From 1994 until 1995, Mr. Burton served as Senior Vice President, Managing Director and member of the board of directors of Interstate Johnson Lane, Incorporated, an investment banking firm where he was responsible for the Corporate Finance and Public Finance Divisions. From 1987 to 1994, Mr. Burton served as President of Rothschild Financial Services, Incorporated (a subsidiary of Rothschild, Inc. of North America), an investment banking company headquartered in New York City that is involved in proprietary trading, securities lending and other investment activities. Mr. Burton also serves as a consultant to numerous companies on investment strategy and investment banking. Mr. Burton served on the board of directors of Capstar, a

4

publicly-traded hotel company, and SNL Securities, a private securities data company. He has held various teaching positions at York College, Rice University and Cornell University and has written and lectured extensively in the field of economics. Mr. Burton received a B.A. degree and an M.A. degree in economics from Rice University and a Ph.D. degree in economics from Northwestern University.

Class II Continuing Directors—Terms Expire in 2008

Marc Holliday has served as our Chief Executive Officer since January 2004. Mr. Holliday has also served as one of our directors since December 2001 and is a member of our Executive Committee of our Board of Directors. Mr. Holliday stepped down as our President in April 2007, when Mr. Mathias was promoted to that position. Mr. Holliday joined our company as Chief Investment Officer in July 1998. Since joining our company, Mr. Holliday has directed our focused business plan of repositioning and strategically upgrading of the portfolio to larger avenue properties with higher quality tenants, while at the same time driving strong earnings performance and growth in stockholder value. Mr. Holliday implemented this plan by overseeing a diversified strategy involving selective acquisitions and dispositions coupled with a successful joint venture initiative and structured finance program. Under Mr. Holliday’s investment guidance, we have grown to be the largest owner of commercial office properties in Manhattan. Mr. Holliday has also served as the president and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Gramercy Capital Corp., or Gramercy (NYSE: GKK), since August 2004. Prior to joining our company, he was Managing Director and Head of Direct Originations for New York-based Capital Trust (NYSE:CT), a mezzanine finance company. While at Capital Trust, Mr. Holliday was in charge of originating direct principal investments for the firm, consisting of mezzanine debt, preferred equity and first mortgages. From 1991 to 1997, Mr. Holliday served in various management positions, including senior vice president at Capital Trust’s predecessor company, Victor Capital Group, a private real estate investment bank specializing in advisory services, investment management, and debt and equity placements. Mr. Holliday received a B.S. degree in Business and Finance from Lehigh University in 1988, as well as an M.S. degree in Real Estate Development from Columbia University in 1990.

John S. Levy has served as one of our directors since 1997 and serves as Chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of our Audit and Compensation Committees. Mr. Levy is a private investor. Mr. Levy was associated with Lehman Brothers Inc. (or its corporate predecessors) from 1983 until 1995. During that period, Mr. Levy served as Managing Director and Chief Administrative Officer of the Financial Services Division, Senior Executive Vice President and Co-Director of the International Division overseeing the International Branch System, and Managing Partner of the Equity Securities Division, where he managed the International, Institutional, Retail and Research Departments. Prior to that period, Mr. Levy was associated with A.G. Becker Incorporated (or its corporate predecessors) from 1960 until 1983. At A.G. Becker, Mr. Levy served as Managing Director of the Execution Services Division, Vice President-Manager of Institutional and Retail Sales, Manager of the Institutional Sales Division, Manager of the New York Retail Office and a Registered Representative. Mr. Levy received a B.A. degree from Dartmouth College.

Class III Continuing Directors—Terms Expire in 2009

John H. Alschuler, Jr. has served as one of our directors since 1997. He serves as Chairman of our Compensation Committee and as a member of our Audit, Executive and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Alschuler is the President of Hamilton, Rabinowitz & Alschuler, Inc., a consulting organization with offices in New York and Los Angeles. He directs a consulting practice devoted to urban development, real estate transactions, and the re-restructuring of public institutions. His work focuses on managing large scale developments in urban areas, planning the revitalization of under-utilized areas, and strategic business planning for downtowns and regions. He has advised a wide range of public and private clients, including General Growth Properties, Trinity Church Real Estate, Macerich, the

5

Guggenheim Foundation, the New York Blood Center, Governors Island Preservation and Education Corporation, the Anacostia Waterfront Corporation, Madison Square Garden, the Related Companies, the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation, the Battery Park City Authority, the New Jersey Performing Arts Center, the Brooklyn Academy of Music, and Brookfield Properties. He has also served as an advisor to the Government of Kuwait, the Cities of Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio, Washington, D.C., and is a regular advisor to the City and State of New York. Mr. Alschuler is an Adjunct Associate Professor at Columbia University where he teaches real estate development for the graduate program. Mr. Alschuler received a B.A. degree from Wesleyan University and an Ed.D. degree from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Stephen L. Green has served as our Chairman and member of our Executive Committee of our Board of Directors since 1997 and is a full-time executive officer of our company with responsibility for developing key market relationships and real estate opportunities while overseeing our long-term strategic direction. Mr. Green stepped down as our Chief Executive Officer in January 2004, when Marc Holliday was promoted to that position. Mr. Green founded our predecessor, S.L. Green Properties, Inc., in 1980. Prior to our initial public offering in 1997, Mr. Green had been involved in the acquisition of over 50 Manhattan office buildings containing in excess of 4.0 million square feet. Mr. Green has also served as the chairman of the board of directors of Gramercy (NYSE: GKK), since August 2004. Mr. Green is an at-large member of the Executive Committee of the Board of Governors of the Real Estate Board of New York and has previously served as Chairman of the Real Estate Board of New York’s Tax Committee. He currently serves as a member on the board of directors of Street Squash. Mr. Green received a B.A. degree from Hartwick College and a J.D. degree from Boston College Law School.

Biographical Information Regarding Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors

Gregory F. Hughes was appointed as our Chief Operating Officer in April 2007 and has served as our Chief Financial Officer since February 2004. Mr. Hughes has also served as the Chief Credit Officer of Gramercy (NYSE:GKK) since August 2004. Mr. Hughes is responsible for finance, capital markets, investor relations and administration. Prior to joining our company, from 2002 to 2003, Mr. Hughes was a Managing Director and the Chief Financial Officer of the real estate private equity group at JP Morgan Partners. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Hughes was a Partner and the Chief Financial Officer of Fortress Investment Group. While at Fortress Investment Group, Mr. Hughes was actively involved in evaluating a broad range of real estate equity and structured finance investments and arranged various financings to facilitate acquisitions and fund recapitalizations. Mr. Hughes also served as Chief Financial Officer of Wellsford Residential Property Trust and Wellsford Real Properties, where he was responsible for the firm’s financial forecasting and reporting, treasury and accounting functions, capital markets and investor relations. While at Wellsford, Mr. Hughes was involved in numerous public and private debt and equity offerings. From 1985 to 1992, Mr. Hughes worked at Kenneth Leventhal & Co., a public accounting firm specializing in real estate and financial services. Mr. Hughes received his B.S. degree in Accounting from the University of Maryland and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Hughes is 43 years old.

Andrew S. Levine was appointed as our Chief Legal Officer in April 2007 and has served as our General Counsel, Executive Vice President and Secretary since November 2000. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Levine was a partner at the law firm of Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn, LLP. Mr. Levine was also a partner at the firm of Dreyer & Traub. As a member of the REIT and Real Estate Transactions and Business groups at Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn, LLP, Mr. Levine served as counsel for a diverse client base of public and private real estate companies, national retailers, REITs, private developers, investment advisers and lenders. Mr. Levine received a B.A. degree from the University of Vermont in 1980 and a J.D. degree from Rutgers School of Law in 1984. Mr. Levine is 48 years old.

Andrew Mathias was appointed as our President in April 2007 and has served as our Chief Investment Officer since January 2004. Mr. Mathias is responsible for the firm’s equity and structured finance

6

investments. Mr. Mathias also oversees the firm’s acquisitions/dispositions and its joint venture program. Mr. Mathias joined our company in March 1999 as a Vice President and was promoted to Director of Investments in 2002, a position he held until his promotion to Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Mathias has also served as the Chief Investment Officer of Gramercy (NYSE:GKK) since August 2004. Prior to joining our company, from July 1998, Mr. Mathias was with New York-based Capital Trust (NYSE:CT), a mezzanine finance company. From June 1995 to July 1998, Mr. Mathias worked at CT’s predecessor company, Victor Capital Group, a private real estate investment bank specializing in advisory services, investment management, and debt and equity placements. While there, he worked on a wide variety of real estate principal investments and advisory transactions, both on behalf of third-party clients and for the firm’s own account. Mr. Mathias also worked on the high yield/restructuring desk at Bear Stearns and Co. Mr. Mathias received a degree in Economics from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Mathias is 33 years old.

The Board of Directors and its Committees

We are managed by a five-member Board of Directors. The Board has affirmatively determined that Messrs. John H. Alschuler, Jr., Edwin Thomas Burton, III and John S. Levy, representing a majority of its members, are independent of our management, as such term is defined by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange Inc., or the NYSE. Our Board of Directors held seventeen meetings during fiscal year 2006. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of our Board of Directors held during 2006 and Messrs. Holliday and Green attended our 2006 annual meeting.

Audit Committee.   We have a standing Audit Committee, consisting of John H. Alschuler, Jr., Edwin Thomas Burton, III (Chairman) and John S. Levy, each of whom is “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Burton is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in rules promulgated by the SEC under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things, engaging our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of their audit engagement, approving professional services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the independence of the auditors, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees, reviewing the adequacy of our internal controls, accounting and reporting practices and assessing the quality and integrity of our consolidated financial statements. In 2004, our Board approved a new amended written charter for our Audit Committee, a copy of which is available on our website at http://www.slgreen.com. Additional information regarding the functions performed by our Audit Committee is set forth in the “Audit Committee Report” included in this annual proxy statement. Our Audit Committee held eight meetings during fiscal year 2006. Each of the committee members attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of our Audit Committee held during fiscal year 2006.

Compensation Committee.   We have a standing Compensation Committee, consisting of John H. Alschuler, Jr. (Chairman), Edwin Thomas Burton, III and John S. Levy, each of whom is “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE. Our Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things, (1) reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Chairman of our Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer and such other executive officers that may be designated by the Chairman of our Board of Directors and/or Chief Executive Officer, evaluating the performance of such officers in light of such goals and objectives, and determining and approving the compensation of such officers based on these evaluations, (2) approving the compensation of our other executive officers, (3) recommending to our Board of Directors for approval the compensation of the non-employee directors, (4) overseeing our incentive-compensation and stock-based compensation plans and (5) reviewing the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for inclusion in this annual proxy statement. Our Compensation Committee also has authority to grant awards under our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive

7

Plan, including our 2006 Long-Term Outperformance Compensation Plan, 2005 Long-Term Outperformance Compensation Plan and our 2003 Long-Term Outperformance Compensation Program. With respect to the compensation of our executive officers, our Compensation Committee solicits recommendations from our Chief Executive Officer regarding total compensation for all executive officers and reviews his recommendations in terms of total compensation and the allocation of such compensation among base salary, annual bonus amounts and other long-term incentive compensation as well as the allocation of such items among cash and equity compensation. Our Compensation Committee has retained SMG Advisory Group, an outside compensation consulting firm, or SMG, to provide relevant market data concerning the marketplace, our peer group and other compensation developments. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”  In 2004, our Board approved a written charter for our Compensation Committee, a copy of which is available on our website at http://www.slgreen.com. Our Compensation Committee held six meetings during fiscal year 2006. Each of the committee members attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of our Compensation Committee held during fiscal year 2006.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.   We have a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, consisting of John H. Alschuler, Jr., Edwin Thomas Burton, III and John S. Levy (Chairman), each of whom is “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, assisting the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, recommending to the Board the director nominees to be elected at each annual meeting of stockholders, recommending to the Board the directors to serve on each of the Board’s committees, developing and recommending to the Board the corporate governance principles and guidelines applicable to our company and directing the Board in an annual review of its performance. In 2004, our Board approved a written charter for our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a copy of which is available on our website at http://www.slgreen.com. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was established in December 2003 by our Board to replace our Nominating Committee which consisted of Messrs. Burton, Alschuler and Levy. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting during fiscal year 2006, in which it nominated two Class III directors whose nomination was successfully voted on at our 2006 annual meeting. All of the committee members attended the meeting of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held during fiscal year 2006.

Executive Committee.   Subject to the supervision and oversight of our Board of Directors, our Executive Committee, which consists of Stephen L. Green, Marc Holliday and John H. Alschuler, Jr., has the authority to approve the acquisition, disposition and financing of investments by us and to authorize the execution of certain contracts and agreements, including those relating to the borrowing of money by us, and to exercise generally all other powers of our Board of Directors, except for those which require action by all directors or the independent directors under our articles of incorporation or bylaws or under applicable law.

8

Director Compensation*

Directors of our company who are also employees receive no additional compensation for their services as directors. The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid to, and the compensation expense we recognized with respect to, our non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

*                    The columns for “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” and “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” have been omitted because they are not applicable.

(1)          Each of Mr. Burton and Mr. Levy deferred all of their 2006 cash compensation and Mr. Alschuler deferred $25,000 of his 2006 cash compensation pursuant to our Independent Directors’ Deferral Program. Deferred compensation includes annual fees, chairman fees and board and committee meeting fees and is credited in the form of phantom stock units. Messrs. Burton, Levy and Alschuler received 1,021 units, 985 units and 226 units, respectively, in connection with 2006 cash compensation each elected to defer.

(2)          Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the non-employee director. Instead, the amounts shown are the compensation costs recognized by our company in fiscal year 2006 for stock awards as determined pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), or FAS 123R. The assumptions used to calculate the value of stock awards are set forth under Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which was filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007. At December 31, 2006, the aggregate number of stock awards, including phantom stock units, outstanding was as follows:  Mr. Burton—17,871; Mr. Alschuler—4,352; and Mr. Levy—4,743.

(3)          Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the non-employee director. Instead, the amounts shown are the compensation costs recognized by our company in fiscal year 2006 for option awards as determined pursuant to FAS 123R. The assumptions used to calculate the value of option awards are set forth under Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which was filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007. The full grant date fair value of the awards to each non-employee director calculated in accordance with FAS 123R is $105,261. At December 31, 2006, the aggregate number of option awards outstanding was as follows:  Mr. Burton—12,000; Mr. Alschuler—18,000; and Mr. Levy—48,000.

(4)          Represents the value of dividends paid in 2006 on the phantom stock units held by each non-employee director.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, each non-employee director received an annual fee in the amount of $50,000. Each non-employee director also received $1,500 for each meeting of our Board of Directors or a committee of our Board of Directors that he attended. The annual fee payable to our non-employee directors is payable quarterly, half in restricted stock and half in cash, unless an non-employee director elects to have the director fee paid 100% in stock or elects to defer all or part of the annual fee pursuant to our Independent Directors’ Deferral Program as described below. Any portion of the annual fee that is paid in stock is made under our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. The meeting

9

fees are paid in cash unless a non-employee director elects to defer all or part of the meeting fees pursuant to our Independent Directors’ Deferral Program. One of our non-employee directors who resides outside of New York is reimbursed for expenses of attending Board of Director and committee meetings.

The Chairman of our Audit Committee, the Chairman of our Compensation Committee and the Chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received additional annual fees of $7,500, $5,000 and $4,000, respectively, which are payable in cash unless such chairman elects to defer all or part of such fee pursuant to our Independent Directors’ Deferral Program. In addition, each member of our Audit Committee was entitled to receive a fee of $4,000 per meeting for any special meetings of the Audit Committee held independently of meetings of our Board of Directors. One such meeting was held in 2006. The special meeting fees are paid in cash unless a non-employee director elects to defer all or part of the meeting fees pursuant to our Independent Directors’ Deferral Program. Each non-employee director, upon initial election or appointment to our Board of Directors, receives options under our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock at the market price of the common stock at the close of business on the day preceding our annual meeting of stockholders. In addition, under our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, each non-employee director is entitled to an annual grant of stock options to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock, which are priced at the close of business on the day preceding our annual stockholder meeting in the year of grant, all of which vest on the date of grant. Each non-employee director was also entitled to an annual grant (reviewed annually) of 1,000 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, a third of which will vest one year from the date of grant, and each of the following two years, respectively, subject to the non-employee director being a member of our Board on the date such award is expected to vest. A non-employee director may elect to defer all or part of the annual stock grant pursuant to our Independent Directors’ Deferral Program.

Our Board of Directors has adopted an Independent Directors’ Deferral Program for non-employee directors. Our non-employee directors may elect to defer up to 100% of their annual fee, chairman fees, meeting fees and annual stock grant under the program. Unless otherwise elected by a participant, fees deferred under the program shall be credited in the form of phantom stock units. The phantom stock units are convertible into an equal number of shares of common stock upon such director’s termination of service from our Board of Directors or a change in control by us, as defined by the program. Phantom stock units are credited quarterly to each non-employee director quarterly using the closing price of our common stock on the applicable dividend record date for the respective quarter. Each participating non-employee director’s account is credited for an equivalent amount of phantom stock units based on the dividend rate for each quarter.

For the 2007 fiscal year, our Board of Directors made no changes to the compensation to be received by our non-employee directors, except that for 2007 and subsequent years, the annual grant of stock options to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock will be priced at the close of business on the first business day in the year of grant.

10

PROPOSAL 2:  RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our Audit Committee has selected the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, subject to ratification of this appointment by our common stockholders. Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since our formation in June 1997 and is considered by our management to be well-qualified. Ernst & Young LLP has advised us that neither it nor any member thereof has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in our company or any of our subsidiaries in any capacity.

A representative of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the annual meeting, will be given the opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Fee Disclosure

Audit Fees

Fees, including out-of-pocket expenses, for audit services totaled approximately $2,346,000 in fiscal year 2006 and $1,428,000 in fiscal year 2005. Audit fees include fees associated with our annual audit and the reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. In addition, audit fees include Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 planning and testing, fees for public filings in connection with various property acquisitions, joint venture audits, and services relating to public filings in connection with preferred and common stock offerings and certain other transactions, including the acquisition of Reckson Associates Realty Corp. Our joint venture partners paid approximately half of the joint venture audit fees. Audit fees also include fees for accounting research and consultations.

Audit-Related Fees

Fees for audit-related services totaled approximately $78,000 in 2006 and $78,000 in 2005. The audit-related services principally include fees for operating expense, tax certiorari audits and employee benefit plan audits. In addition, the audit-related services include fees for agreed-upon procedures projects and acquisition due diligence.

Tax Fees

Fees for tax services, including tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning totaled approximately none in 2006 and none in 2005.

All Other Fees

Fees for all other services not included above totaled none in 2006 and none in 2005.

Our Audit Committee considers whether the provision by Ernst & Young LLP of the services that are required to be described under “All Other Fees” is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence from both management and our company.

11

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures of our Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit services and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, except for any de minimis non-audit services. Non-audit services are considered de minimis if (1) the aggregate amount of all such non-audit services constitutes less than 5% of the total amount of revenues we paid to our independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal year in which they are provided; (2) we did not recognize such services at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and (3) such services are promptly brought to our Audit Committee’s attention and approved prior to the completion of the audit by our Audit Committee or any of its member(s) who has authority to give such approval. None of the fees reflected above were approved by our Audit Committee pursuant to this de minimis exception. Our Audit Committee may delegate to one or more of its members who is an independent director the authority to grant pre-approvals. All services provided by Ernst & Young LLP in 2006 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee.

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

12

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The following is a report by our Audit Committee regarding the responsibilities and functions of our Audit Committee. This Report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any previous or future documents filed by us with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate the Report by reference in any such document.

Our Audit Committee oversees our financial reporting process on behalf of our Board of Directors, in accordance with our Audit Committee Charter. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal controls, and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws and regulations. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, our Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

Our Audit Committee reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm, who is responsible for auditing our financial statements and for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as currently in effect. Our Audit Committee received the written disclosure and the letter from our independent registered public accounting firm required by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, as currently in effect, discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the auditors’ independence from both management and our company and considered the compatibility of our independent registered public accounting firms’ provision of non-audit services to our company with their independence.

Our Audit Committee discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their audit. Our Audit Committee met with our independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our internal controls and the overall quality of our financial reporting, including off-balance sheet investments and our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, but subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilities of our Audit Committee referred to below, our Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors (and our Board of Directors has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for filing with the SEC.

Our Board of Directors has determined that our Audit Committee has at least one “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in Item 401(h) of SEC Regulation S-K, such expert being Mr. Edwin Thomas Burton, III, and that he is “independent,” as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Our Audit Committee held eight meetings during fiscal year 2006 (including non-management director sessions after certain of these meetings). The members of our Audit Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting. Committee members rely, without independent investigation or verification, on the information provided to them and on the representations made by management and independent registered public accounting firm. Accordingly, our Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has

13

maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, our Audit Committee’s considerations and discussions referred to above do not assure that the audit of our financial statements has been carried out in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), that the financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or that Ernst & Young LLP is in fact “independent.”

14

PROPOSAL 3:  APPROVAL OF OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

At our annual meeting, the stockholders are being asked to vote on a proposal to ratify and approve the adoption of our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. The plan was approved by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) on March 14, 2007, subject to approval by the stockholders.

Under our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan 1,536,286 shares (or Fungible Units) currently remain available for awards. Under the proposal, an additional 3,500,000 Fungible Units shall be made available under our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Accordingly, our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan will provide for a maximum of 7,000,000 Fungible Units to be issued thereunder, however, if the stockholders approve the proposal, a total of 5,036,286 will remain available for new awards (comprising the 1,536,286 Fungible Units currently available for awards, plus the additional 3,500,000 Fungible Units added by the proposed amendment).

In addition, as summarized below, our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan is proposed to be amended to reflect changes in the valuation methodology utilized by Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) with respect to calculating the value of full-value awards and the rate at which awards will be made thereunder. These amendments will provide that (as applied to the Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan) (i) awards based upon the full value of a share shall be counted against the overall share limitation as 3.0 units (from 3.9 units under the prior plan), (ii) awards based upon the full value of a share that vest or are granted based upon the achievement of certain performance goals (“Full-Value Performance Awards”) shall be counted against the overall share limitation as 2.0 units (from 2.6 units under the prior plan), and (iii) stock options, stock appreciation rights and other awards that do not deliver the value at grant thereof of the underlying share and that expire five years from the date of grant shall be counted against the overall share limitation as 0.7 of a unit (from 0.8 of a unit under the prior plan). Stock options, stock appreciation rights and other awards that do not deliver the value at grant thereof of the underlying share and that expire 10 years from the date of grant shall continue to be counted against the overall share limitation as 1.0 unit. With respect to the total Fungible Units available under the Plan, Full-Value Performance Awards continue to be discounted by 35% against awards based upon the full value of shares (consistent with the terms of the Plan prior to the amendment and restatement). In addition, Full-Value Performance Awards are subject to the same performance measures as applied to our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan prior to its amendment and restatement (subject to a revision to the list of peer group companies to add three companies in replacement of companies which were acquired since the initial effective date of our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan). In addition, our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan is proposed to be amended to provide that at the end of the third calendar year following the effective date of our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the three year average of (A) the number of shares subject to awards granted in a single year, divided by (B) the number of shares of our outstanding common stock at the end of such year shall not exceed the greater of 2.23% or the mean of the applicable peer group.

Summary of the Provisions of Our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

The following summary of our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, or our stock option and incentive plan, is qualified in its entirety by the specific language of the plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A, marked to reflect changes to our current 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

Administration

Our Compensation Committee has the authority to administer and interpret our stock option and incentive plan, to authorize the granting of awards, to determine the eligibility of an employee, director or consultant to receive an award, to determine the number of shares of common stock to be covered by each award, to determine the terms, provisions and conditions of each award, to prescribe the form of

15

instruments evidencing awards and to take any other actions and make all other determinations that it deems necessary or appropriate. Our Compensation Committee may, among other things, establish performance goals that must be met in order for awards to be granted or to vest, or for the restrictions on any such awards to lapse. Our stock option and incentive plan will be administered by our Compensation Committee, each member of which is, to the extent required by Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a non-employee director and will, at such times as the Company is subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the Code, qualify as an outside director for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, or, if no committee exists, our Board of Directors. Nevertheless, grants to members of our Compensation Committee will be made and administered by our Board of Directors rather than our Compensation Committee. References below to our Compensation Committee include a reference to our Board of Directors for those periods in which our Board of Directors is acting. Our Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may delegate to our chief executive officer all or part of our Compensation Committee’s authority and duties with respect to awards; however, our Compensation Committee may not delegate its authority and duties with respect to awards that have been, or will be, granted to certain of our officers.

Available Shares

Subject to adjustments upon certain corporate transactions or events, up to a maximum of 7,000,000 Fungible Units (the “Fungible Pool Limit”) may be subject to stock options, restricted stock, phantom stock units, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based awards under our stock option and incentive plan. Each Share issued or to be issued in connection with awards other than stock options, stock appreciation rights or other awards that do not deliver the full value at grant thereof of the underlying shares (e.g., restricted stock) (“Full-Value Awards”) that vest or are granted based on the achievement of certain performance goals that are based on (A) FFO growth, (B) total return to stockholders (either in absolute terms or compared with other companies in the market), (C) total return to stockholders in the top one-third of the “peer group” (which for these purposes shall comprise:  Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., American Financial Realty Trust, Boston Properties, Inc., Brandywine Realty Trust, Corporate Office Properties Trust, Crescent Real Estate Equities Company, Douglas Emmett, Duke Realty Corporation, Highwoods Properties, Inc., HRPT Properties, Kilroy Realty Corporation, Liberty Property Trust, Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, Maguire Properties, Parkway Properties, SL Green Realty Corp., and Washington REIT) or (D) a combination of the foregoing (as set forth in our stock option and incentive plan), shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 2.0 units (also referred to herein as Full-Value Performance Awards). Each share issued or to be issued in connection with any other Full-Value Awards shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 3.0 units. Options, stock appreciation rights and other awards that do not deliver the value at grant thereof of the underlying shares and that expire 10 years from the date of grant shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 1 unit. Options, stock appreciation rights and other awards that do not deliver the value at grant thereof of the underlying Shares and that expire five years from the date of grant shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 0.7 of a unit. Thus, under the foregoing rules, depending on the type of grants made, while a total of 5,036,286 shares remain available for awards, as many as 7,194,694 shares can be the subject of grants under the stock option and incentive plan. At the end of the third calendar year following the effective date of our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as well as at the end of the third calendar year following the effective date of our Amended and Restated Stock Option and Incentive Plan, (i) the three-year average of (A) the number of shares subject to awards granted in a single year, divided by (B) the number of shares of our outstanding common stock at the end of such year shall not exceed the (ii) greater of (A) 2% with respect to the third calendar year following the effective date of our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, or 2.23% with respect to the third calendar year following the effective date of our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan or (B) the mean of the applicable peer group. For purposes of calculating the number of shares granted in a year in connection with the limitation set forth in the foregoing sentence, shares underlying Full-Value Awards will be taken into account as

16

(i) 1.5 shares if our annual common stock price volatility is 53% or higher, (ii) two shares if our annual common stock price volatility is between 25% and 52%, and (iii) four shares if our annual common stock price volatility is less than 25%. No award may be granted to any person who, assuming exercise of all options and payment of all awards held by such person, would own or be deemed to own more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. In addition, subject to adjustment upon certain corporate transactions or events, a participant may not receive awards (with shares subject to awards being counted, depending on the type of award, in the proportions ranging from 0.7 to 3.0, as described above) in any one year covering more than 700,000 shares; thus, under this provision, depending on the type of grant involved, as many as 1,000,000 shares can be the subject of option grants to any one person in any year, and as many as 350,000 shares may be granted as restricted stock (or be the subject of other Full-Value Grants) to any one person in any year. If an option or other award granted under the stock option and incentive plan expires or terminates, the common stock subject to any portion of the award that expires or terminates without having been exercised or paid, as the case may be, will again become available for the issuance of additional awards. Shares of our common stock distributed under our stock option and incentive plan may be treasury shares or authorized but unissued shares. Unless the stock option and incentive plan is previously terminated by our Board of Directors, no new award may be granted under the stock option and incentive plan after the tenth anniversary of the date that such plan was initially approved by our Board of Directors.

Awards Under the Plan

Our key employees, directors, officers, advisors, consultants or other personnel or other persons expected to provide significant services (of a type expressly approved by our Compensation Committee as covered services for these purposes) to us or our subsidiaries are eligible to be granted Options, Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares, Dividend Equivalent Rights and other equity-based awards under our stock option and incentive plan. Eligibility for awards under our stock option and incentive plan is generally determined by our Compensation Committee.

Stock Options.   The terms of specific options, including whether options shall constitute “incentive stock options” for purposes of Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, shall be determined by our Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. The exercise price of an option shall be determined by our Compensation Committee and reflected in the applicable award agreement. The exercise price may not be lower than 100% (110% in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder, if permitted under the plan) of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Each option will be exercisable after the period or periods specified in the award agreement, which will not exceed ten years from the date of grant. Options will be exercisable at such times and subject to such terms as determined by our Compensation Committee.

Restricted Stock.   A restricted stock award is an award of shares of common stock that is subject to restrictions on transferability and such other restrictions, if any, as our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee may impose at the date of grant. Grants of restricted stock may be subject to vesting schedules as determined by our Compensation Committee. The restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, including, without limitation, (i) a specified period of employment or the satisfaction of one or a combination of the performance goals set forth in Exhibit B of our stock option and incentive plan (which is attached hereto as Appendix A), or (ii) based on other goals established by our Compensation Committee. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, upon a termination of employment or other service for cause or by the grantee for any reason, all shares of restricted stock still subject to restrictions shall be forfeited. In addition, unless otherwise provided in an applicable award agreement, a participant granted restricted stock shall have all the rights of a stockholder of our company, including the right to vote the shares and the right to receive any cash dividends currently. Dividends paid on all restricted stock will be at the same rate and on the same date as on shares of our common stock. Holders of restricted stock are prohibited from selling such shares until they vest.

17

Phantom Shares.   Phantom shares will vest as provided in the applicable award agreement. A phantom share represents a right to receive the fair market value of a share of our common stock, or, if provided by our Compensation Committee, the right to receive the fair market value of a share of our common stock in excess of a base value established by our Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Phantom shares may generally be settled in cash or by transfer of shares of common stock (as may be elected by the participant or our Compensation Committee, as may be provided by our Compensation Committee at grant). Unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, subject to elections by the grantee in accordance with the plan, the settlement date with respect to a phantom share is the first day of the month to follow the date on which the phantom share vests. Our Compensation Committee may, under certain circumstances, permit a participant to receive as settlement of the phantom shares installments over a period not to exceed ten years. In addition, our Compensation Committee may establish a program under which distributions with respect to phantom shares may be deferred for additional periods as set forth in the preceding sentence.

Dividend Equivalents.   A dividend equivalent is a right to receive (or have credited) the equivalent value (in cash or shares of common stock) of cash distributions made on shares of common stock otherwise subject to an award (e.g., an award of options or phantom shares); provided, however, that a dividend equivalent right may not be granted in connection with an award of options or stock appreciation rights. Our Compensation Committee may provide that amounts payable in the ordinary course with respect to dividend equivalents shall be converted into cash or additional shares of common stock. Our Compensation Committee will establish all other limitations and conditions of awards of dividend equivalents as it deems appropriate.

Other Stock-Based Awards.   Our stock option and incentive plan will authorize the granting of (i) other awards based upon the common stock including shares based upon certain conditions, convertible preferred shares, convertible debentures and other exchangeable or redeemable securities or equity interests, and stock appreciation rights, (ii) limited-partnership or any other membership or ownership interests (which may be expressed as units or otherwise) in a subsidiary or operating or other partnership (or other affiliate of the company), with any shares being issued in connection with the conversion of (or other distribution on account of) such interest being subject to the Fungible Pool Limit and the other provisions of our stock option and incentive plan, and (iii) awards valued by reference to book value, fair value or performance parameters relative to the company or any subsidiary or group of subsidiaries.

Adjustments in General; Certain Change in Control Provisions

In the event of certain corporate reorganizations or other events, our Compensation Committee generally may make certain adjustments in its discretion to the manner in which our stock option and incentive plan operates (including, for example, to the number of shares available under our stock option and incentive plan), and may otherwise take actions which, in its judgment, are necessary to preserve the rights of plan participants. Upon a change in control (as defined in the plan), our Compensation Committee generally may make such adjustments as it, in its discretion, determines are necessary or appropriate in light of the change in control, if our Compensation Committee determines that the adjustments do not have an adverse economic impact on the participants, and certain other special provisions may apply.

Amendment and Termination

We may grant awards under our stock option and incentive plan until the 10th anniversary of the earlier of the date on which it is approved by (i) our Board of Directors or (ii) our stockholders. Our Board of Directors may generally amend our stock option and incentive plan as it deems advisable, except in certain respects regarding outstanding awards. In addition, our stock option and incentive plan may not be amended without stockholder approval if the absence of such approval would cause our stock option and incentive plan to fail to comply with any applicable legal requirement or applicable stock exchange or similar rule.

18

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

Incentive Stock Options

In general, neither the grant nor the exercise of an incentive stock option will result in taxable income to an option holder or a deduction for us. To receive special tax treatment as an incentive stock option under the Internal Revenue Code as to shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option, an option holder must not dispose of the shares either within two years after the incentive stock option is granted or within one year after the transfer of the shares to the option holder pursuant to exercise of the option. In addition, the option holder must be an employee of ours or of a qualified subsidiary at all times between the date of grant and the date three months (one year in the case of disability) before exercise of the option. (Special rules apply in the case of the death of the option holder.)  Incentive stock option treatment under the Internal Revenue Code generally allows any gain resulting from the sale of common stock received upon the exercise of an incentive stock option to be treated as a capital gain to the option holder, but we will not be entitled to a tax deduction. The exercise of an incentive stock option (if the holding period rules described in this paragraph are satisfied), however, will give rise to income includable by the option holder in his or her alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of the alternative minimum tax in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the stock acquired on the date of the exercise of the option over the exercise price.

If the holding period rules noted above are not satisfied, certain gain recognized on the disposition of the shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option will be characterized as ordinary income. This gain will be equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise. (Special rules may apply to disqualifying dispositions where the amount realized is less than the value at exercise.)  We will generally be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of such gain included by an option holder as ordinary income. Any excess of the amount realized upon such disposition over the fair market value at exercise will generally be long-term or short-term capital gain depending on the holding period involved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if exercise of the option is permitted other than by cash payment of the exercise price, various special tax rules may apply.

Non-Qualified Stock Options

No income will be recognized by an option holder at the time a non-qualified stock option is granted. Ordinary income will generally be recognized by an option holder, however, at the time a non-qualified stock option is exercised in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the exercise date over the exercise price. We will generally be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes in the same amount as the amount included in ordinary income by the option holder with respect to his or her non-qualified stock option. Gain or loss on a subsequent sale or other disposition of the shares acquired upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option will be measured by the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the tax basis of such shares, and will generally be long-term or short-term capital gain depending on the holding period involved. The tax basis of the shares acquired upon the exercise of any non-qualified stock option will be equal to the sum of the exercise price of the non-qualified stock option and the amount included in income with respect to the option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that exercise of the option is permitted other than by cash payment of the exercise price, various special tax rules may apply.

Restricted Stock

Unless a holder of restricted stock makes an “83(b) election” (as discussed below), there generally will be no tax consequences as a result of the grant of restricted stock until the restricted stock is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture or is transferable (free of the risk). Generally, when the

19

restrictions are lifted, the holder will recognize ordinary income, and we will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes, equal to the difference between the fair market value of the stock at that time and the amount, if any, paid by the holder for the restricted stock. Subsequently realized changes in the value of the stock generally will be treated as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on the length of time the shares are held prior to their disposition. Unless an “83(b) election” is made (as discussed below), dividends on shares subject to restrictions will generally be considered compensation income. In general terms, if a holder makes an 83(b) election (under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code) upon the award of restricted stock, the holder will recognize ordinary income on the date of the award of restricted stock, and we will be entitled to a deduction, equal to (i) the fair market value of the restricted stock as though the stock were (A) not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture or (B) transferable, minus (ii) the amount, if any, paid for the restricted stock. If an 83(b) election is made, generally there will be no tax consequences to the holder upon the lifting of restrictions, and all subsequent appreciation or depreciation in the restricted stock generally will be eligible for capital gains treatment.

Phantom Shares

The phantom shares have been designed with the intention that there will be no tax consequences as a result of the granting of a phantom share until payment is made to the participant with respect to the phantom share. When payment is made, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income, and we will generally be entitled to a deduction, equal to the fair market value of the common stock and/or cash, as applicable, received upon payment.

Dividend Equivalents

There generally will be no tax consequences as a result of the award of a dividend equivalent. When payment is made, the holder of the dividend equivalent generally will recognize ordinary income, and we will be entitled to a deduction, equal to the amount received in respect of the dividend equivalent.

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

Additional special tax rules may apply to those award holders who are subject to the rules set forth in Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this proxy statement is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed in this proxy statement.

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

20

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF OUR ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

Our Board of Directors has declared the articles of amendment and restatement of our Articles of Incorporation advisable and has directed that the proposal be submitted for consideration at the annual meeting. A form of Articles of Amendment and Restatement, marked to reflect changes to our current Articles of Incorporation, is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B, and this summary of the provisions of the Articles of Amendment and Restatement is qualified in its entirety by reference to Appendix B, which you should read in its entirety.

Our company is presently authorized by its Articles of Incorporation to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock. At March 20, 2007, 59,180,818 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding and 7,373,885 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance for purposes of conversion of outstanding convertible securities, dividend reinvestment and direct purchases, and stock options and stock purchases under stockholder approved employee benefit plans, leaving only 33,445,297 shares of common stock available for issuance. Consequently, we may not have a sufficient number of authorized shares of common stock available if necessary for future mergers and acquisitions, capital raising activities, stock splits and other legitimate corporate purposes.

If the proposal is approved by the holders of our common stock, our current Articles of Incorporation will be amended and restated to provide that our company has the authority to issue 260,000,000 shares of stock, consisting of 160,000,000 shares of common stock, 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 75,000,000 shares of excess stock, each with a par value $0.01 per share. We currently have the authority to issue 200,000,000 shares of stock, consisting of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 75,000,000 shares of excess stock, each with a par value of $0.01 per share. Because the number of outstanding shares of common stock is approaching the maximum number of shares of common stock authorized by our current Articles of Incorporation, we wish to increase the number of authorized shares of stock to permit us to issue additional shares of common stock in the future.

In addition, if the proposal is approved by the holders of common stock, various ministerial changes not requiring stockholder approval will be made to our current Articles of Incorporation.

Our Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock. This will provide flexibility with respect to future transactions, including acquisitions of other businesses where we would have the option to use our common stock (or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock) as consideration (rather than cash), financing future growth, financing transactions, stock splits and other corporate purposes.

Our stockholders will not have any preemptive rights with respect to the additional shares being authorized. No further approval by stockholders would be necessary prior to the issuance of any additional shares of common stock, except as may be required by law or applicable NYSE rules. In certain circumstances, generally relating to the number of shares to be issued and the identity of the recipient, the rules of the NYSE require stockholder authorization in connection with the issuance of such additional shares. Subject to law and the rules of the NYSE, our Board of Directors has the sole discretion to issue additional shares of common stock on such terms and for such consideration as may be determined by our Board of Directors. The issuance of any additional shares of common stock may have the effect of diluting the percentage of stock ownership of our present stockholders.

We have not proposed the increase to our authorized stock with the intention of using the additional common stock for anti-takeover purposes, although we could theoretically use the additional stock in the future to make it more difficult or to discourage an attempt to acquire control of our company. As of the

21

date of this proxy statement, we are unaware of any pending or threatened efforts to acquire control of our company.

If the holders of common stock approve the proposal, the Articles of Amendment and Restatement will be filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland, or the SDAT, and the amendment and restatement of our Articles of Incorporation as described above will be effective upon the acceptance for record of the Articles of Amendment and Restatement by the SDAT.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the Amendment and Restatement of our Articles of Incorporation.

22

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

This section of our proxy statement contains information about a variety of our corporate governance policies and practices. In this section, you will find information about how we are complying with the NYSE’s final corporate governance rules that were approved by the SEC. We are committed to operating our business under strong and accountable corporate governance practices. You are encouraged to visit the corporate governance section of the “Investors—Corporate Governance” page of our corporate website at http://www.slgreen.com to view or to obtain copies of our committee charters, code of business conduct and ethics, corporate governance principles and director independence standards. The information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC. You may also obtain, free of charge, a copy of the respective charters of our committees, code of business conduct and ethics, corporate governance principles and director independence standards by directing your request in writing to SL Green Realty Corp., 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10170-1881, Attention:  Investor Relations. Additional information relating to the corporate governance of our company is also included in other sections of this proxy statement.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that address significant issues of corporate governance and set forth procedures by which our Board carries out its responsibilities. Among the areas addressed by the Corporate Governance Guidelines are director qualification standards, director responsibilities, director access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, management succession, annual performance evaluation of the Board and management responsibilities. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for assessing and periodically reviewing the adequacy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines and will recommend, as appropriate, proposed changes to the Board.

Director Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a majority of our directors serving on our Board must be independent as required by the listing standards of the NYSE and the applicable rules promulgated by the SEC. In addition, our Board of Directors has adopted director independence standards, which are certain additional categorical standards to assist in making determinations with respect to the independence of directors. Our Board has affirmatively determined, based upon its review of all relevant facts and circumstances, that each of the following directors and director nominees has no direct or indirect material relationship with us and is independent under the listing standards of the NYSE and the applicable rules promulgated by the SEC:  Messrs. Edwin T. Burton, III, John H. Alschuler, Jr. and John S. Levy. Our Board has determined that Messrs. Green and Holliday, our two other directors, are not independent because they are also executive officers of our company.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors, executive officers and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics was designed to assist our directors, executive officers and employees in complying with the law, resolving moral and ethical issues that may arise and in complying with our policies and procedures. Among the areas addressed by the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are compliance with applicable laws, conflicts of interest, use and protection of our company’s assets, confidentiality, communications with the public, accounting matters, records retention, fair dealing, discrimination and harassment and health and safety.

23

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our Board of Directors has determined that our Audit Committee has at least one “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in Item 401(h) of SEC Regulation S-K, such expert being Mr. Edwin T. Burton, III, and that he is “independent,” as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Mr. Burton has agreed to serve as our audit committee financial expert.

Communications with our Board of Directors

We have a process by which stockholders and/or other parties may communicate with our Board of Directors or individual directors. Any such communications may be sent to our Board by U.S. mail or overnight delivery and should be directed to Andrew S. Levine, Secretary, at SL Green Realty Corp., 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York  10170-1881, who will forward them on to the intended recipient. Any such communications may be made anonymously.

Whistleblowing and Whistleblower Protection Policy

Our Audit Committee has established procedures for (1) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by our company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and (2) the confidential and anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. If you wish to contact our Audit Committee to report complaints or concerns relating to the financial reporting of our company, you may do so in writing to the Chairman of our Audit Committee, c/o General Counsel, SL Green Realty Corp., 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York  10170-1881. Any such communications may be made anonymously.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

We encourage each member of our Board of Directors to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. Messrs. Holliday and Green attended the annual meeting of stockholders held on May 17, 2006.

Identification of Director Candidates

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists our Board of Directors in identifying and reviewing director candidates to determine whether they qualify for membership on the Board and for recommending to the Board the director nominees to be considered for election at our annual meeting of stockholders.

In making recommendations to our Board, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers such factors as it deems appropriate. These factors may include judgment, skill, diversity, education, experience with businesses and other organizations comparable to our company, the interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other Board members, the candidate’s industry knowledge and experience, the ability of a nominee to devote sufficient time to the affairs of our company and the extent to which the candidate generally would be a desirable addition to the Board and any committees of the Board.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may solicit and consider suggestions of our directors or management regarding possible nominees. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also procure the services of outside sources or third parties to assist in the identification of director candidates.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider director candidates recommended by our stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will apply the same standards in considering candidates submitted by stockholders as it does in evaluating candidates

24

submitted by members of our Board. Any recommendations by stockholders should follow the procedures outlined under “Stockholder Proposals” in this proxy statement and should also provide the reasons supporting a candidate’s recommendation, the candidate’s qualifications and the candidate’s written consent to being considered as a director nominee. In addition, any stockholder recommending a director candidate should submit information demonstrating the number of shares of common stock that he or she owns.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

In accordance with the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the non-management directors serving on our Board of Directors generally meet in executive session after each regularly scheduled meeting of the Audit Committee without the presence of any directors or other persons who are part of our management. The executive sessions regularly are chaired by the chair of the Board committee having jurisdiction over the particular subject matter to be discussed at the particular session or portion of a session.

Disclosure Committee

We maintain a Disclosure Committee consisting of members of our executive management and senior employees. Our Disclosure Committee meets at least quarterly. The purpose of our Disclosure Committee is to bring together representatives from our core business lines and employees involved in the preparation of our financial statements so that the group can discuss any issues or matters of which the members are aware that should be considered for disclosure in our public SEC filings. Our Disclosure Committee reports to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and, as appropriate, to our Audit Committee.

25

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

This section of our proxy statement discusses the principles underlying our executive compensation policies and decisions and the most important factors relevant to an analysis of these policies and decisions. It provides qualitative information regarding the manner and context in which compensation is awarded to, and earned by, our named executive officers and places in perspective the data presented in the tables and narrative that follow.

Throughout this proxy statement, the individuals who served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer during our 2006 fiscal year, as well as the other individuals included in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 33, are referred to as the “named executive officers,” or our “executives.”

Objectives of Our Compensation Program

Our Compensation Committee, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, sets our compensation philosophy, which is based upon three primary objectives:

·       Attract, Motivate and Retain Key Employees. Our Compensation Committee believes that the success of our company is closely correlated with having a strong management team and other talented key employees. The New York City commercial real estate market is an intensely competitive environment where investment banks, merchant banks, opportunity and hedge funds, REITs and other private real estate investors compete for qualified and experienced individuals with a successful track record. Therefore, the existence of a competitive compensation program is essential for our long-term success through the retention and motivation of our current management team, and the ability to successfully attract new key performers.

·       Link Compensation to Performance. One of the cornerstones of our compensation philosophy is the correlation between executive compensation and performance of our company. Our Compensation Committee sets executive compensation based on the attainment of company and individual performance goals. Performance is measured both against company specific goals and relative to the performance of our key competitors. A substantial portion of our compensation is performance-based and contains significant back-end vesting to encourage retention and continued performance. We have been the top performing REIT in the office sector for each of the past three years and for the past one-, three- and five-year periods based on total return to stockholders, and one of the top performing companies in the entire REIT industry in those respective periods, including the top performing equity REIT in 2006. We believe that total return to stockholders is an important measure of management performance.

·       Alignment of Management’s Interest with Stockholders. To more fully align the interest of our executive officers with those of our stockholders, we structure a substantial portion (generally two-thirds) of our executive compensation in the form of equity awards that allow our executive officers to share in the creation of value for our stockholders through stock appreciation and dividends. These equity awards are generally subject to time and/or performance-based vesting requirements designed to promote the retention of management and to achieve strong performance for our company. Additionally, substantial portions of our performance-based awards have time-based vesting requirements with significant back-end vesting after the achievement of the performance metrics. This is designed to encourage retention and continued performance. As a result, our executives would suffer a material economic forfeiture should they leave our employment.

26

Setting Executive Compensation

Our Compensation Committee determines compensation for our executive officers and is comprised of our three independent directors, John H. Alschuler, Jr. (Chairman), Edwin Thomas Burton, III and John S. Levy. Our Compensation Committee exercises independent discretion in respect of executive compensation matters and administers our stock option and incentive plan (including reviewing and approving equity grants to our executives pursuant to this plan). Our Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board of Directors, a copy of which is available on our website at http://www.slgreen.com.

Our Compensation Committee has retained SMG Advisory Group, an outside compensation consulting firm, or SMG. SMG provides our Compensation Committee and Chief Executive Officer with relevant market data concerning the marketplace, our peer group and other compensation developments. SMG regularly participates in Committee meetings and meets with management. Our Compensation Committee has the authority to replace SMG or hire additional consultants at any time. SMG also provides additional professional services to our company and receives market-based compensation with respect to these services.

With respect to the compensation of our executive officers, our Compensation Committee solicits recommendations from our Chief Executive Officer regarding total compensation for all executive officers and reviews his recommendations in terms of total compensation and the allocation of such compensation among base salary, annual bonus amounts and other long-term incentive compensation as well as the allocation of such items among cash and equity compensation. We do not have a pre-established policy for the allocation between cash and non-cash compensation or between annual and long-term incentive compensation, but we attempt to pay the majority of our total compensation in the form of long-term equity incentives. Our Compensation Committee also reviews materials and data provided by SMG in analyzing these recommendations. The ultimate determination on total compensation and the elements that comprise that total compensation is made solely by our Compensation Committee.

Our Compensation Committee meets regularly during the year (six meetings in 2006) to evaluate executive performance against the goals and objectives set at the beginning of the year, to monitor market conditions in light of these goals and objectives, to solicit input from the compensation consultant on market practices and any new developments and to review our compensation practices. Our Compensation Committee makes regular reports to our Board of Directors.

What Our Compensation Program is Designated to Reward

Our Compensation Committee has designed our executive compensation program to achieve three primary objectives: (i) attracting, motivating and retaining our key employees; (ii) linking compensation to performance; and (iii) aligning the interests of our executive officers with our stockholders. We expect our company to perform at the highest levels of the REIT office sector and industry in general. We accomplish this by maintaining our ability to attract, engage, motivate and retain employees in key positions who represent “best in class” and that foster a high-performance culture.

Our Compensation Committee rewards the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals of both our company and the individual executive. Our Compensation Committee measures performance on an absolute basis against financial and other measures established at the beginning of the year and on a relative basis by comparing our company’s performance against other office REITs and against the REIT industry generally. Comparative performance is an important metric since market conditions may affect the ability to meet specific performance criteria. We have been the top performing REIT in the office sector for each of the past three years and for the past one-, three- and five-year periods based on total return to stockholders, or TRS, and one of the top performing companies in the entire REIT industry in those respective periods, including the top performing equity REIT in 2006. We believe that TRS is an important measure of management performance.

27

Historically and in 2006, our Compensation Committee paid approximately two-thirds of total compensation to our executive officers in the form of equity incentive compensation based on the superior performance of our company. The annual bonus rewards the achievement of goals set by our Chief Executive Officer with input from our Board of Directors and each individual executive at the beginning of the year. Long-term incentive compensation is designed to provide incentives for each executive to successfully implement our long-term strategic goals and to retain such executive. Additionally, a substantial portion of performance-based awards have time-based vesting requirements with significant back-end vesting after the achievement of the performance metrics. This is designed to encourage retention and continued performance. As a result, our executives would suffer a material economic forfeiture should they leave our employment. Our named executive officers (other than Mr. Green) were not founders of our company and, therefore, did not have an ownership interest in our company prior to their employment with us. Therefore, we have designed our annual and long-term incentive programs to award performance-based equity to allow our executives to grow their ownership in our company and create a further alignment with our stockholders.

Measuring 2006 Performance

The following goals for our company, among others, were set for 2006:  (i) be at the top of the office REIT sector in TRS (measured as growth in share price plus dividends); (ii) increase same-store performance by four to six percent; (iii) increase Funds From Operations, or “FFO,” by seven and one-half to ten percent; (iv) raise the dividend per common share by six to eight percent; (v) increase portfolio occupancy by one hundred basis points; (vi) continue the growth of Gramercy Capital Corp. (an NYSE listed commercial mortgage REIT externally advised by one of our subsidiaries); (vii) dispose of $100.0 to $150.0 million of non-core assets; (viii) use existing capital and recycled capital from the disposition of non-core assets for new acquisitions; and (ix) finish the redevelopment and leasing of Grand Central Square.

We achieved all of these objectives and many more. Particular emphasis was placed on one-, three- and five-year TRS of 77.7%, 257.1% and 424.1%, respectively, and that the one-year TRS achieved by our company for each of 2004, 2005 and 2006 was the highest of all office REITs in such years. In addition, the one-year TRS by our company for 2006 was the highest in the equity REIT industry. From January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2006, our stock price went from $41.05 to $132.78 per share. Our company produced substantial value for its stockholders in 2005 and 2006, creating $4.8 billion and $4.0 billion, respectively, of additional enterprise value. Our company also:

·       had the highest one-year TRS (77.7%) of all equity REITs in 2006,

·       increased same-store performance by 9.0%,

·       increased FFO by 10.8%,

·       increased our dividend by 16.7%,

·       increased occupancy by 100.0 basis points,

·       increased, through our subsidiary manager, Gramercy Capital Corp.’s assets by over $1.0 billion and produced a 46.5% TRS,

·       sold $160.0 million of non-core assets generating a $2.07 per share gain,

·       acquired seven new assets totaling over $1.0 billion,

·       leased nearly 1.0 million square feet to attain a 93% occupancy at Grand Central Square,

28

·       raised approximately an aggregate of $800.3 million through public offerings of our common stock in 2006, and

·       entered into a merger agreement to acquire Reckson Associates Realty Corp., or Reckson, for approximately $6.0 billion and a separate agreement with an asset-purchasing venture led by former executives of Reckson to sell to such venture over $2.0 billion of assets from the Reckson portfolio. Both transactions closed in January 2007.

Elements of Our Compensation Program and Why We Chose Each Element

Our executive officers’ compensation currently has three primary components:

·       annual base salary;

·       annual incentives, which include cash and equity bonuses; and

·       long-term incentives, which include restricted stock awards, stock options or performance awards made pursuant to an executive officer’s employment agreement or our 2005 Plan (as defined below) or Outperformance Plans (as defined below), as applicable.

We view the various components of compensation as related but distinct. Our Compensation Committee designs total executive compensation packages that it believes will best create retention incentives, link compensation to performance and align the interests of our executive officers and our stockholders. Each of our named executive officers has an employment agreement with us, which are described under—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control. Such agreements provide for certain severance or change of control payments under specified circumstances.

Annual Base Salary.   We pay annual base salaries for each of our executive officers in accordance with the employment agreement between us and such executive officer, which salaries are reviewed annually by our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee pays our executive officers annual base salaries to compensate them for services rendered during the fiscal year, which compensation is designed to be competitive with investment banks, merchant banks, opportunity and hedge funds, REITs and other private real estate investors in the New York City commercial real estate market. Our Compensation Committee believes that the base salaries for our executive officers are in the median of those companies we benchmark ourselves against. Our Compensation Committee’s annual review of an executive includes a review of his individual performance, his performance against the other executive officers and our company’s overall performance. Increases to the annual salary set forth in the executive’s employment agreement are based on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of such executive’s performance as well as our company’s overall performance. We intentionally structure an executive’s annual base salary to be a relatively low percentage of total compensation.

Annual Incentives.   Annual incentives are provided in the form of cash and equity bonuses to be paid if certain performance objectives are achieved and as provided by an executive officer’s employment agreement. Our Compensation Committee may adjust the annual incentives following its evaluation of an executive officer’s individual performance. Our annual incentives are designed to focus an executive officer on achieving key corporate financial objectives (both individually and company-based), to motivate certain desired individual behaviors and to reward substantial achievement of these objectives and individual goals. We pay our executive officers annual incentives shortly after completion of the fiscal year when year-end financial results are available. This allows the Compensation Committee to evaluate the Company’s performance against its stated goals and objectives.

Our Compensation Committee delivers a substantial portion of an executive officer’s year-end compensation in the form of equity awards which links an executive officer’s net worth directly to the performance of our stock price. This encourages our executive officers to make decisions with an

29

ownership mentality. The vesting provisions of these equity awards (generally three to five years) are designed to act as a retention device and provide a strong incentive to the executives to increase stockholder value long after they performed the services in the year for which the equity awards were granted. The awards also contain forfeiture provisions, with a significant portion of the vesting back-ended, if the executive voluntarily leaves or is terminated with cause. These provisions protect our interests by, among other things, providing a strong economic incentive for an executive to stay with our company. Additionally, restricted stock awards and certain other equity awards generally are accompanied by receipt of tax gross-up payments to avoid having the executive sell stock to satisfy the tax obligation created from this incentive award. The 2006 annual incentives were designed to compensate our executive officers for their industry leading performance in terms of TRS, creation of enterprise value, achievement of corporate objectives and for entering into the Reckson merger agreement.

Long-Term Incentives.   Long-term incentives are provided to our executive officers through the grant of restricted stock awards, stock options or performance awards, including awards of interests in GKK Manager LLC, or the Manager Interests, and awards of Class B limited partner interests in GKK Capital L.P., or the Class B Interests, pursuant to our 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, or our 2005 Plan, and our 2006 Outperformance Plan, 2005 Outperformance Plan and 2003 Long-Term Outperformance Compensation Program, or collectively our Outperformance Plans. For an overview of our 2005 Plan and our Outperformance Plans, see “—Equity Incentive Plans.”

A large portion of our long-term incentive compensation is comprised of equity awards under our Outperformance Plans, which are designed to compensate our executive officers upon the attainment of certain goals with respect to TRS and to provide an incentive for such executives to remain with our company and focus on long-term growth in our stock price. Under our Outperformance Plans, the executives receive restricted stock or equity-based awards based upon TRS over a performance threshold, but in all events, subject to an overall cap. In addition to performance thresholds which are designed to achieve an average TRS of ten percent over a three- or four-year period (subject to certain acceleration provisions), the awards also include time-based vesting requirements following the achievement of the performance thresholds. This creates, in the aggregate, up to a seven-year period (with most of the awards vesting in the final two years)  that the executive needs to stay at our company to reap a significant majority of the value of these awards. The result of the structure of our Outperformance Plans is to tie a large portion of an executive officer’s compensation to creation of stockholder value and continued employment with our company over a long-term basis. Therefore, an executive has a strong economic incentive to continue his employment with our Company. It also provides the executive an added incentive to maximize the value of our stock long after the achievement of the performance that triggered the award.

All stock options are priced in accordance with the terms of our 2005 Plan and are based on the price of our company’s common stock at the close of business on the day prior to the date of grant. We do not coordinate grants of options so that they are made before announcement of favorable information or after the announcement of unfavorable information.

How Each Element and Our Decisions Regarding Each Element Fit Into Our Overall Compensation Objectives and Affect Decisions Regarding Other Elements

Our compensation program seeks to reward our executive officers for superior performance, which is competitive with the total compensation paid to executive officers at investment banks, merchant banks, opportunity and hedge funds, REITs and other private real estate investors in the New York City commercial real estate market, while closely aligning the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. In making compensation decisions, our Compensation Committee considers various measures of company and industry performance, including (i) TRS (over the prior one-, three- and five-year periods), (ii) growth in FFO per share, (iii) growth in dividends per share and (iv) certain material corporate events consummated during the applicable fiscal year. Consistent with this approach,

30

our Compensation Committee pays our named executive officers annual base salaries in order to provide them with a minimum compensation level that is intended to reflect such officer’s unique value and historical contributions to our success in light of salary norms of our company’s competitive marketplace. Our Compensation Committee pays our named executive officers annual incentives to reward our executive officers for achievement of financial and other performance (both company and individual based) during the last completed fiscal year, with a substantial portion of the annual incentive payment made in restricted stock, options or other equity-based awards in order to ensure focus on long-term company performance and continued service with our company. In connection with the payment of annual base salaries and annual incentives, our Compensation Committee seeks to implement a pay-for-performance philosophy. Finally, our Compensation Committee pays our executive officers long-term incentives, primarily based on the performance of our stock price or the consummation of material corporate events, to act as a retention tool and to provide continued and additional incentives to maximize our stock price and thereby more closely align the economic interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. In doing so, our Compensation Committee considers equity awards granted in connection with employment agreements of our executive officers and potential payouts to our executive officers under our Outperformance Plans. Through the elements of our compensation program, our Compensation Committee seeks to maintain a competitive total compensation package for each executive, while being sensitive to our fiscal year budget, annual accounting costs and the impact of share dilution in making such compensation payments.

Employee Benefits

We have implemented a 401(k) Savings/Retirement Plan, or our 401(k) Plan, to cover eligible employees of ours and of any designated affiliate. Our 401(k) Plan permits eligible employees to defer up to 15% of their annual compensation, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The employees’ elective deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401(k) Plan.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

We do not provide significant perquisites or personal benefits to our executive officers, except that we reimburse our Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of our Board of Directors for costs associated with automobiles they lease for personal use. Additionally, we provide the Chairman of our Board of Directors with a full-time driver and our Chief Executive Officer receives certain insurance benefits. We reimburse our directors for travel and lodging expenses, if any, in connection with our Board of Director’s (including committee) meetings. In addition, we reimburse our executive officers and our other employees for certain meals and we provide car service as appropriate.

Other Matters

Tax and Accounting Treatment.   Our Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Section 162(m) limits the deductibility on our tax return of compensation over $1 million to any of our named executive officers unless, in general, the compensation is paid pursuant to a plan which is performance-related, non-discretionary and has been approved by our stockholders. Our Compensation Committee’s policy with respect to Section 162(m) is to make every reasonable effort to ensure that compensation is deductible to the extent permitted while simultaneously providing our executives with appropriate compensation for their performance. We paid compensation to certain of our named executive officers during 2006, a portion of which may be nondeductible under the limitations set forth in Section 162(m). Our Compensation Committee may make compensation payments that are not fully

31

deductible if in its judgment such payments are necessary to achieve the objectives of our compensation program.

On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law, changing the tax rules applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. While the final regulations have not become effective yet, we believe we are operating in good faith compliance with the statutory provisions that were effective January 1, 2005.

Beginning on January 1, 2003, we began accounting for stock-based payments through our equity incentive plans, including our Outperformance Plans, in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123-R.

Adjustments for Certain Items.   Our Compensation Committee has not considered whether it would attempt to recover compensation awards or payments based on our financial performance where our financial statements are restated in a downward direction sufficient to reduce the amount of such awards or payments that should have been made or paid under applicable criteria.

Other Policies

We do not have any policy in place regarding minimum ownership requirements for either our executive officers or directors. We do not have any policy in place regarding the ability of our executive officers or directors to engage in hedging activities with respect to our common stock.

Compensation Committee Report

Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, our Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this annual proxy statement.

32

Summary Compensation Table*

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid to, and the compensation expense we recognized with respect to, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each of our three most highly compensated executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (collectively, the “named executive officers”). It is noted that a number of the executive compensation arrangements described below may be subject to adjustment for changes to be made in light of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

*                      The columns for “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” and “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” have been omitted because they are not applicable.

**                 Mr. Holliday stepped down as President effective April 16, 2007, when Mr. Mathias was promoted to that position. Mr. Hughes and Mr. Levine were promoted to the positions of Chief Operating Officer and Chief Legal Officer, respectively, effective April 16, 2007.

(1)                Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer. Instead, the amounts shown are the compensation costs recognized by our company in fiscal year 2006 for stock awards (which consist of restricted stock awards, awards made pursuant to our Outperformance Plans, awards of interests in GKK Manager LLC, or the Manager Interests, and awards of Class B limited partner interests in GKK Capital L.P., or the Class B Interests, some of which were granted in prior years) as determined pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), or FAS 123R. The assumptions used to calculate the value of stock awards are set forth under Notes 2 and 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which was filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007. For a description of the Manager Interests and the Class B Interests, see “—Equity Compensation Plan Information—Other Equity Incentive Awards.”

(2)                Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer. Amounts shown are the compensation costs recognized by our company in fiscal year 2006 for option awards as determined pursuant to FAS 123R. The assumptions used to calculate the value of option awards are set forth under Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which was filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007.

(3)                The table below shows the components of this column, which include perquisites, tax gross-ups, and loan forgiveness amounts.

(a)                 Represents the cash payments made with respect to tax payments due on the restricted stock awards made to the named executive officers.

(b)                Represents (i) our company’s matching contributions with respect to amounts earned by the named executive officer under our 401(k) plan, (ii) leased car payments and (iii) life insurance premiums. Our company’s 401(k) matching contributions are credited in the year subsequent to which employees make their contributions.

33

(c)                 Represents (i) our company’s matching contributions with respect to amounts earned by the named executive officer under our 401(k) plan and (ii) leased car and full-time driver payments. Our company’s 401(k) matching contributions are credited in the year subsequent to which employees make their contributions.

(d)                Represents our company’s matching contributions with respect to amounts earned by the named executive officer under our 401(k) plan. Our company’s 401(k) matching contributions are credited in the year subsequent to which employees make their contributions.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to each grant of an award made to a named executive officer in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

(1)                For information regarding the performance criteria for this award, see “—2005 Long-Term Outperformance Compensation Plan.”

(2)                The amounts shown in this column reflect a restricted stock award granted to each named executive officer on January 1, 2006, which vests in three annual installments of 25%, 25% and 50%.

(3)                The exercise price for all options granted to the named executive officer is 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the grant date. We do not pay dividend equivalents on stock options.

(4)                The value of a stock award or option award is based on the fair value as of the grant date of such award determined pursuant to FAS 123R.

For a discussion of each named executive officer’s employment agreement and our Outperformance Plans, see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” and “—Outperformance Plans,” respectively.

34

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all outstanding equity awards held by each named executive officer at the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.