Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM          TO        

 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1-10521

 

CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

 

Delaware

 

95-2568550

(State of Incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

City National Plaza

555 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, California, 90071

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

 

(213) 673-7700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes  x  No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer x

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Smaller reporting company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  o  Yes  x No

 

As of July 30, 2010, there were 52,102,417 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

3

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

42

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

71

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

74

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

76

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

76

Item 4.

Reserved

76

Item 6.

Exhibits

77

 

 

 

 

2



Table of Contents

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands, except share amounts)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2009

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

$

184,277

 

$

364,483

 

$

350,931

 

Due from banks - interest-bearing

 

336,244

 

443,443

 

205,656

 

Federal funds sold

 

404,760

 

5,000

 

125,000

 

Securities available-for-sale - cost $4,668,089, $4,319,420, and $3,373,176 at  June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities pledged as collateral

 

198,577

 

226,985

 

226,961

 

Held in portfolio

 

4,562,566

 

4,079,773

 

3,103,365

 

Trading securities

 

129,287

 

154,302

 

138,137

 

Loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

11,483,044

 

12,146,908

 

12,421,342

 

Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses

 

290,492

 

288,493

 

256,018

 

Loans and leases, excluding covered loans, net

 

11,192,552

 

11,858,415

 

12,165,324

 

Covered loans

 

2,034,591

 

1,851,821

 

 

Net loans and leases

 

13,227,143

 

13,710,236

 

12,165,324

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premises and equipment, net

 

121,960

 

124,309

 

125,510

 

Deferred tax asset

 

99,894

 

164,038

 

204,303

 

Goodwill

 

479,982

 

479,982

 

459,454

 

Customer-relationship intangibles, net

 

44,838

 

45,601

 

37,108

 

Bank-owned life insurance

 

78,170

 

76,834

 

75,516

 

Affordable housing investments

 

101,999

 

93,429

 

96,389

 

Customers’ acceptance liability

 

2,515

 

2,951

 

6,094

 

Other real estate owned ($98,841 and $60,558 covered by FDIC loss share at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)

 

153,292

 

113,866

 

18,064

 

FDIC indemnification asset

 

394,012

 

380,743

 

 

Other assets

 

711,931

 

612,782

 

322,973

 

Total assets

 

$

21,231,447

 

$

21,078,757

 

$

17,660,785

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demand deposits

 

$

8,173,386

 

$

7,753,936

 

$

7,118,660

 

Interest checking deposits

 

2,171,369

 

2,278,586

 

1,568,379

 

Money market deposits

 

5,742,069

 

4,546,532

 

4,108,607

 

Savings deposits

 

294,327

 

393,177

 

243,722

 

Time deposits-under $100,000

 

434,626

 

756,616

 

212,833

 

Time deposits-$100,000 and over

 

1,157,136

 

1,650,601

 

1,246,050

 

Total deposits

 

17,972,913

 

17,379,448

 

14,498,251

 

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

177,700

 

626,779

 

316,388

 

Other short-term borrowings

 

700

 

690

 

50,000

 

Subordinated debt

 

337,691

 

340,137

 

162,434

 

Long-term debt

 

473,283

 

471,029

 

233,456

 

Reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments

 

19,310

 

17,340

 

20,422

 

Acceptances outstanding

 

2,515

 

2,951

 

6,094

 

Other liabilities

 

272,753

 

176,238

 

163,072

 

Total liabilities

 

19,256,865

 

19,014,612

 

15,450,117

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interest

 

47,622

 

51,381

 

36,752

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 200,000 and 400,000 shares issued and aggregate liquidation preference of $200,000 and $400,000 at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively

 

 

196,048

 

391,091

 

Common stock, par value $1.00 per share; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 53,885,886 shares issued at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009

 

53,886

 

53,886

 

53,886

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

483,983

 

513,550

 

511,939

 

Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)

 

58,050

 

(3,049

)

(18,110

)

Retained earnings

 

1,418,486

 

1,377,639

 

1,365,842

 

Treasury shares, at cost - 1,796,485, 2,349,430 and 2,415,021 shares at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively

 

(112,634

)

(151,751

)

(156,119

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total common shareholders’ equity

 

1,901,771

 

1,790,275

 

1,757,438

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

1,901,771

 

1,986,323

 

2,148,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

25,189

 

26,441

 

25,387

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total equity

 

1,926,960

 

2,012,764

 

2,173,916

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

21,231,447

 

$

21,078,757

 

$

17,660,785

 

 

See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases

 

$

174,354

 

$

143,705

 

$

343,904

 

$

287,880

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

32,866

 

31,492

 

65,066

 

56,593

 

Trading securities

 

24

 

379

 

(28

)

433

 

Due from banks - interest-bearing

 

424

 

291

 

770

 

446

 

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements

 

135

 

9

 

157

 

15

 

Total interest income

 

207,803

 

175,876

 

409,869

 

345,367

 

Interest Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

12,584

 

16,068

 

25,748

 

35,629

 

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

1,704

 

2,084

 

3,639

 

4,263

 

Subordinated debt

 

4,664

 

873

 

9,304

 

2,073

 

Other long-term debt

 

6,845

 

1,222

 

13,666

 

2,816

 

Other short-term borrowings

 

8

 

53

 

9

 

113

 

Total interest expense

 

25,805

 

20,300

 

52,366

 

44,894

 

Net interest income

 

181,998

 

155,576

 

357,503

 

300,473

 

Provision for credit losses on loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

32,000

 

70,000

 

87,000

 

120,000

 

Provision for losses on covered loans

 

46,516

 

 

46,516

 

 

Net interest income after provision

 

103,482

 

85,576

 

223,987

 

180,473

 

Noninterest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trust and investment fees

 

33,976

 

25,184

 

67,485

 

51,053

 

Brokerage and mutual fund fees

 

5,461

 

6,645

 

10,742

 

16,402

 

Cash management and deposit transaction charges

 

12,008

 

12,778

 

24,584

 

26,001

 

International services

 

8,374

 

7,996

 

14,882

 

14,521

 

Bank-owned life insurance

 

658

 

871

 

1,336

 

1,734

 

FDIC loss sharing income, net

 

28,339

 

 

37,425

 

 

(Loss) gain on disposal of assets

 

(2,814

)

43

 

(1,423

)

43

 

Gain on sale of securities

 

355

 

3,281

 

2,489

 

350

 

Gain on acquisition

 

25,228

 

 

25,228

 

 

Other

 

11,448

 

8,996

 

18,161

 

15,021

 

Impairment loss on securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total other-than-temporary impairment loss on securities

 

(13,992

)

(25,297

)

(14,995

)

(37,333

)

Less: Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income

 

13,486

 

23,760

 

13,486

 

23,760

 

Net impairment loss recognized in earnings

 

(506

)

(1,537

)

(1,509

)

(13,573

)

Total noninterest income

 

122,527

 

64,257

 

199,400

 

111,552

 

Noninterest Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

99,590

 

75,834

 

195,251

 

154,086

 

Net occupancy of premises

 

13,347

 

12,559

 

26,252

 

24,820

 

Legal and professional fees

 

13,274

 

7,736

 

22,255

 

15,469

 

Information services

 

7,538

 

6,992

 

15,054

 

13,472

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

6,363

 

5,953

 

12,710

 

11,945

 

Marketing and advertising

 

5,798

 

4,743

 

11,046

 

9,419

 

Office services and equipment

 

4,272

 

3,922

 

8,070

 

7,526

 

Amortization of intangibles

 

2,128

 

1,668

 

4,575

 

3,511

 

Other real estate owned

 

16,783

 

2,155

 

33,980

 

2,250

 

FDIC assessments

 

7,662

 

13,861

 

14,183

 

16,929

 

Other operating

 

9,823

 

8,711

 

19,136

 

17,692

 

Total noninterest expense

 

186,578

 

144,134

 

362,512

 

277,119

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

39,431

 

5,699

 

60,875

 

14,906

 

Income taxes

 

(2,859

)

(986

)

1,559

 

646

 

Net income

 

$

42,290

 

$

6,685

 

$

59,316

 

$

14,260

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

972

 

(88

)

2,300

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to City National Corporation

 

$

41,318

 

$

6,773

 

$

57,016

 

$

14,233

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less: Dividends and accretion on preferred stock

 

 

5,501

 

5,702

 

11,002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

41,318

 

$

1,272

 

$

51,314

 

$

3,231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share, basic

 

$

0.78

 

$

0.02

 

$

0.98

 

$

0.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share, diluted

 

$

0.78

 

$

0.02

 

$

0.97

 

$

0.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares used to compute income per share, basic

 

52,012

 

50,416

 

51,852

 

49,028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares used to compute income per share, diluted

 

52,542

 

50,551

 

52,336

 

49,138

 

Dividends per share

 

$

0.10

 

$

0.10

 

$

0.20

 

$

0.35

 

 

See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

59,316

 

$

14,260

 

Adjustments to net income:

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for credit losses on loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

87,000

 

120,000

 

Provision for losses on covered loans

 

46,516

 

 

Amortization of intangibles

 

4,575

 

3,511

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

12,710

 

11,945

 

Amortization of cost and discount on long-term debt

 

412

 

306

 

Share-based employee compensation expense

 

8,109

 

7,193

 

Loss (gain) on disposal of assets

 

1,423

 

(43

)

Gain on sale of securities

 

(2,489

)

(350

)

Gain on acquisition

 

(25,228

)

 

Impairment loss on securities

 

1,509

 

13,573

 

Other, net

 

(15,045

)

(1,701

)

Net change in:

 

 

 

 

 

Trading securities

 

25,015

 

163,861

 

Deferred income tax benefit

 

17,813

 

(389

)

Other assets and other liabilities, net

 

154,439

 

(97,945

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

376,075

 

234,221

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of securities available-for-sale

 

(1,684,200

)

(1,983,459

)

Sales of securities available-for-sale

 

432,021

 

446,001

 

Maturities and paydowns of securities available-for-sale

 

907,157

 

378,688

 

Loan originations, net of principal collections

 

629,454

 

(77,410

)

Net payments for premises and equipment

 

(10,361

)

(6,161

)

Net cash acquired in acquisitions

 

94,706

 

 

Other investing activities, net

 

10,235

 

745

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

379,012

 

(1,241,596

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in deposits

 

51,966

 

1,846,127

 

Net decrease in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

(449,079

)

(591,769

)

Net decrease in short-term borrowings, net of transfers from long-term debt

 

(30,529

)

(74,500

)

Net decrease in other borrowings

 

(904

)

(6,583

)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

17,761

 

540

 

Tax benefit from exercise of stock options

 

3,281

 

100

 

Redemption of preferred stock

 

(200,000

)

 

Issuance of common stock

 

 

119,929

 

Repurchase of common stock warrants

 

(18,500

)

 

Cash dividends paid

 

(13,467

)

(26,680

)

Other financing activities, net

 

(3,261

)

(2,467

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(642,732

)

1,264,697

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

112,355

 

257,322

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

812,926

 

424,265

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

925,281

 

$

681,587

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period for:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

39,413

 

$

45,593

 

Income taxes

 

 

17,682

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Transfer of loans to other real estate owned

 

$

66,653

 

$

17,179

 

Transfer from securities available-for-sale to trading securities

 

 

6,400

 

Assets acquired (liabilities assumed) in acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

$

17,183

 

$

 

Covered loans

 

330,566

 

 

Covered other real estate owned

 

15,161

 

 

Deposits

 

(541,499

)

 

Other borrowings

 

(30,539

)

 

 

See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

City National Corporation Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

other

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

shares

 

Preferred

 

Common

 

paid-in

 

comprehensive

 

Retained

 

Treasury

 

controlling

 

Total

 

(in thousands, except share amounts)

 

issued

 

stock

 

stock

 

capital

 

income (loss)

 

earnings

 

shares

 

interest

 

equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, January 1, 2009

 

50,961,457

 

$

390,089

 

$

50,961

 

$

389,077

 

$

(48,022

)

$

1,379,624

 

$

(156,736

)

$

25,441

 

$

2,030,434

 

Net income (1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,233

 

 

1,083

 

15,316

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

80

 

Non-credit related impairment loss on investment securities, net of taxes of $9.9 million

 

 

 

 

 

(13,821

)

 

 

 

(13,821

)

Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, net of taxes of $31.5 million and reclassification of $1.1 million net loss included in net income

 

 

 

 

 

43,757

 

 

 

 

43,757

 

Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of taxes of $0.1 million and reclassification of $3.4 million net gain included in net income

 

 

 

 

 

(104

)

 

 

 

(104

)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,083

 

45,228

 

Dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,137

)

(1,137

)

Issuance of common stock

 

3,220,000

 

 

3,220

 

116,409

 

 

 

 

 

119,629

 

Issuance of shares under share-based compensation plans

 

(295,571

)

 

(295

)

(525

)

 

 

617

 

 

(203

)

Preferred stock accretion

 

 

1,002

 

 

 

 

(1,002

)

 

 

 

Share-based employee compensation expense

 

 

 

 

7,138

 

 

 

 

 

7,138

 

Tax expense from share-based compensation plans

 

 

 

 

(661

)

 

 

 

 

(661

)

Cash dividends:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,000

)

 

 

(10,000

)

Common

 

 

 

 

 

 

(17,013

)

 

 

(17,013

)

Net change in deferred compensation plans

 

 

 

 

449

 

 

 

 

 

449

 

Change in redeemable noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

 

 

52

 

Balance, June 30, 2009

 

53,885,886

 

$

391,091

 

$

53,886

 

$

511,939

 

$

(18,110

)

$

1,365,842

 

$

(156,119

)

$

25,387

 

$

2,173,916

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, January 1, 2010

 

53,885,886

 

$

196,048

 

$

53,886

 

$

513,550

 

$

(3,049

)

$

1,377,639

 

$

(151,751

)

$

26,441

 

$

2,012,764

 

Net income (1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,016

 

 

1,070

 

58,086

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

80

 

Non-credit related impairment loss on investment securities, net of taxes of $5.6 million

 

 

 

 

 

(7,844

)

 

 

 

(7,844

)

Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, net of taxes of $49.9 million and reclassification of $1.2 million net gain included in net income

 

 

 

 

 

69,338

 

 

 

 

69,338

 

Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of taxes of $2.9 million and reclassification of $3.2 million net gain included in net income

 

 

 

 

 

(475

)

 

 

 

(475

)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,070

 

119,185

 

Dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,070

)

(1,070

)

Issuance of shares under share-based compensation plans

 

 

 

 

(22,687

)

 

 

39,109

 

 

16,422

 

Preferred stock accretion

 

 

3,952

 

 

 

 

(3,952

)

 

 

 

Redemption of preferred stock

 

 

(200,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(200,000

)

Repurchase of common stock warrants

 

 

 

 

(18,500

)

 

 

 

 

(18,500

)

Share-based employee compensation expense

 

 

 

 

8,090

 

 

 

 

 

8,090

 

Tax benefit from share-based compensation plans

 

 

 

 

2,181

 

 

 

 

 

2,181

 

Cash dividends:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,750

)

 

 

(1,750

)

Common

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,467

)

 

 

(10,467

)

Net change in deferred compensation plans

 

 

 

 

425

 

 

 

8

 

 

433

 

Change in redeemable noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

924

 

 

 

 

 

924

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,252

)

(1,252

)

Balance, June 30, 2010

 

53,885,886

 

$

 

$

53,886

 

$

483,983

 

$

58,050

 

$

1,418,486

 

$

(112,634

)

$

25,189

 

$

1,926,960

 

 


(1)

Net income excludes net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest of $1,230 and ($1,056) for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Redeemable noncontrolling interest is reflected in the mezzanine section of the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 16 of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Organization

 

City National Corporation (the “Corporation”) is the holding company for City National Bank (the “Bank”).  The Bank delivers banking, trust and investment services through more than 80 offices in Southern California, the San Francisco Bay area, Nevada and New York City.  The Corporation has seven consolidated investment advisory affiliates and a noncontrolling interest in two other firms.  The Corporation also has two unconsolidated subsidiaries, Business Bancorp Capital Trust I and City National Capital Trust I.  Because the Bank comprises substantially all of the business of the Corporation, references to the “Company” mean the Corporation and the Bank together. The Corporation is approved as a financial holding company pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999.

 

Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Corporation, its non-bank subsidiaries, the Bank and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, after the elimination of all material intercompany transactions.  The Company has both redeemable and non-redeemable noncontrolling interest. A noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable to a parent.  Preferred stock of consolidated bank affiliates that is owned by third parties is reflected as Noncontrolling interest in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets.  Redeemable noncontrolling interest includes noncontrolling ownership interests that are redeemable at the option of the holder or outside the control of the issuer.  The redeemable equity ownership interests of third parties in the Corporation’s investment advisory affiliates are not considered to be permanent equity and are reflected as Redeemable noncontrolling interest in the mezzanine section between liabilities and equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Noncontrolling interests’ share of subsidiary earnings is reflected as Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in the consolidated statements of income.

 

The Company’s investment management and wealth advisory affiliates are organized as limited liability companies.  The Corporation generally owns a majority position in each affiliate and certain management members of each affiliate own the remaining shares. The Corporation has contractual arrangements with its affiliates whereby a percentage of revenue is allocable to fund affiliate operating expenses (“operating share”) while the remaining portion of revenue (“distributable revenue”) is allocable to the Corporation and the noncontrolling owners. All majority-owned affiliates that meet the prescribed criteria for consolidation are consolidated.  In November 2009, the Company deconsolidated one of its affiliates, but retained a noncontrolling interest in that affiliate.  The Corporation’s interests in two investment management affiliates in which it holds a noncontrolling share are accounted for using the equity method.  Additionally, the Company has various interests in variable interest entities (“VIEs”) that are not required to be consolidated.  See Note 15 for a more detailed discussion on VIEs.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The Company’s accounting and reporting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and practices in the financial services industry. To prepare the financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and income and expenses during the reporting period. Circumstances and events that differ significantly from those underlying the Company’s estimates and assumptions could cause actual financial results to differ from those estimates. The material estimates included in the financial statements relate to the allowance for loan and lease losses, the reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments, valuation of stock options and restricted stock, income taxes, goodwill and intangible asset impairment, securities available-for-sale impairment, private equity and alternative investment impairment, valuation of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, subsequent valuation of covered loans, valuation of noncontrolling interest and the valuation of financial assets and liabilities reported at fair value.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

The Company has applied its critical accounting policies and estimation methods consistently in all periods presented in these financial statements. The allowance for loan and lease losses reflects management’s ongoing assessment of the credit quality of the Company’s portfolio, which is affected by a broad range of economic factors.  Additional factors affecting the provision include net loan charge-offs, nonaccrual loans, specific reserves, risk-rating migration and changes in the portfolio size and composition. The Company’s estimates and assumptions are expected to change as changes in market conditions and the Company’s portfolio occur in subsequent periods.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The Company is on the accrual basis of accounting for income and expenses.  The results of operations reflect any adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q, and which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented.  In accordance with the usual practice of banks, assets and liabilities of individual trust, agency and fiduciary funds have not been included in the financial statements. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

The results for the 2010 interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.  The Company has not made any significant changes in its critical accounting policies or in its estimates and assumptions from those disclosed in its 2009 Annual Report other than the adoption of new accounting pronouncements and other authoritative guidance that became effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. Refer to Accounting Pronouncements for discussion of accounting pronouncements adopted in 2010.

 

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified or restated to conform to the current period presentation.

 

Accounting Pronouncements

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the following accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company were issued or became effective:

 

·                  In December 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU’) 2009-16, which codifies FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets into Codification Topic 860. ASU 2009-16 represents a revision to former FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. ASU 2009-16 expands required disclosures about transfers of financial assets and the risks associated with a transferor’s continuing involvement with transferred assets.  It also removes the concept of “qualifying special-purpose entity” from U.S. GAAP.  The new guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2010.  Adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

·                  In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17, which codifies FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), into Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810, Consolidations (“ASC 810”). ASU 2009-17 revises former FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.  The revised guidance requires, among other things, that an entity perform both a quantitative and qualitative analysis to determine if it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE and therefore required to consolidate the VIE.  The qualitative analysis includes determining whether an entity has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE. The amended guidance also requires consideration of related party relationships in the determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE and enhanced disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement with a VIE. The new guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2010.  Adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

·                  In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820), Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”).  ASU 2010-06 enhances disclosure requirements under ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), to include disclosure of transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2, and detail of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements.  The ASU also provides clarification of existing disclosure requirements pertaining to the level of disaggregation used in fair value measurements, and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.  The new guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2010.  Adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

·                  In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855), Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”).  ASU 2010-09 addresses the interaction of the requirements of Subtopic 855-10 with the SEC’s reporting requirements.  The amendments in the ASU provide that an entity that is an SEC filer is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated.  The ASU also refines the scope of disclosure requirements pertaining to revised financial statements.  The new guidance became effective for the Company upon issuance. Adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

·                  In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, Consolidation (Topic 810), Amendments for Certain Investment Funds (“ASU 2010-10”).  ASU 2010-10 defers the effective date of the consolidation provisions contained in ASU 2009-17 for a reporting entity’s interest in an entity: (1) that has attributes of an investment company; or (2) for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies.  The ASU also clarifies how a related party’s interests in an entity should be considered when evaluating the criteria for determining whether a decision maker or service provider fee represents a variable interest.  In addition, the ASU clarifies that a quantitative calculation should not be the sole basis for evaluating whether a decision maker’s or service provider’s fee is a variable interest.  The new guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2010.  Adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

·                  In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310), Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset (“ASU 2010-18”). ASU 2010-18 applies to loans that are currently accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (“ASC 310-30”), as part of a pool of loans that, when acquired, had deteriorated in credit quality.  Under the guidance, modification of a loan that is part of a pool accounted for under ASC 310-30 should not result in removal of the loan from the pool. Such modifications would include those that would otherwise qualify as a troubled debt restructuring had the loan not been part of a pool. ASU 2010-18 is effective for any modifications of a loan accounted for within a pool in the first interim reporting period ending after July 15, 2010, and will be applied prospectively. Early application is permitted as long as an entity has not issued financial statements in that fiscal year.  The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2010-18 effective with March 31, 2010 reporting.  Adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

·                  In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures About the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (“ASU 2010-20”) which requires new and enhanced disclosures about the credit quality of an entity’s financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses.  The new and amended disclosure requirements focus on such areas as nonaccrual and past due financing receivables, allowance for credit losses related to financing receivables, impaired loans, credit quality information and modifications.  The ASU requires an entity to disaggregate new and existing disclosures based on how it develops its allowance for credit losses and how it manages credit exposures.  The guidance is effective for an entity’s first annual period that ends on or after December 15, 2010.  The Company is evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2010-20 on its disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

Note 2. Business Combinations

 

1st Pacific Bank of California and Sun West Bank

 

On May 7, 2010, the Bank acquired the banking operations of 1st Pacific Bank of California (“FPB”) in a purchase and assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Excluding the effects of acquisition accounting adjustments, the Bank acquired approximately $318.6 million in assets and assumed $264.2 million in liabilities.  The Bank acquired most of FPB’s assets, including loans with a fair value of $202.8 million and assumed deposits with a fair value of $237.2 million. The Bank paid $12.3 million in cash to the FDIC.

 

On May 28, 2010, the Bank acquired the banking operations of Sun West Bank (“SWB”) in Las Vegas, Nevada in a purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC. Excluding the effects of acquisition accounting adjustments, the Bank acquired approximately $340.0 million in assets and assumed $310.1 million in liabilities.  The Bank acquired most of SWB’s assets, including loans and other real estate owned (“OREO”) with a fair value of $127.6 million and $12.1 million, respectively, and assumed deposits with a fair value of $304.3 million. The Bank received approximately $29.2 million in cash from the FDIC.

 

The Bank did not immediately acquire banking facilities, furniture or equipment as part of the purchase and assumption agreements, but has a 90 day option to purchase any or all owned bank premises including furniture, fixtures and equipment and to assume any or all leases for leased bank premises from the FDIC.

 

In connection with the acquisitions of FPB and SWB, the Bank entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC under which the FDIC will reimburse the Bank for 80 percent of eligible losses with respect to covered assets.  Covered assets include acquired loans (“covered loans”) and OREO (“covered OREO”) that are covered under the loss sharing agreement with the FDIC.  Under the FPB loss sharing agreement, the Company has a first loss tranche of $22.3 million that is not reimbursable by the FDIC.  The Company will recognize losses of up to $22.3 million, and all subsequent losses above that threshold will then be subject to FDIC reimbursement of 80 percent. There is no first loss tranche under the SWB loss sharing agreement.  The term of the loss share agreements is ten years for single family residential loans and five years for all other loans.  The expected reimbursements under the loss sharing agreements were recorded as an indemnification asset at their estimated fair value of $36.5 million for FPB and $104.6 million for SWB.  The difference between the fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset and the undiscounted cash flow the Bank expects to collect from the FDIC is accreted into noninterest income.

 

The Bank recognized a $3.8 million liability in the acquisition of FPB relating to a requirement that the Bank reimburse the FDIC if actual cumulative losses are lower than the cumulative losses originally estimated by the FDIC prior to the acquired bank’s failure.  There was no similar liability recognized in the acquisition of SWB.

 

The Bank recognized a gain of $0.5 million and $24.7 million on the acquisitions of FPB and SWB, respectively.  The gain represents the amount by which the fair value of the assets acquired and consideration received from or paid to the FDIC exceeds the liabilities assumed.  The gain is reported in Gain on acquisition in the consolidated statements of income.  The Bank recognized approximately $1.7 million of acquisition-related expense.  This expense is included in Other noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

 

The consolidated income statement for 2010 includes the operating results produced by the acquired assets and assumed liabilities of FPB and SWB from their respective acquisition dates through June 30, 2010, which are not material to total operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010.  Due primarily to the Bank acquiring certain assets and liabilities of FPB and SWB which are not material to the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, the significant amount of fair value adjustments, and the FDIC loss sharing agreement, the historical results of the acquired banks are not material to the Company’s results, and as a result, no pro forma information is presented.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

Note 2. Business Combinations (Continued)

 

Imperial Capital Bank

 

On December 18, 2009, the Bank acquired the banking operations of Imperial Capital Bank (“ICB”) in a purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC.  Excluding the effects of acquisition accounting adjustments, the Company acquired approximately $3.25 billion in assets and assumed $3.09 billion in liabilities. The Bank acquired most of ICB’s assets, including loans and OREO with a fair value of $1.86 billion and $58.8 million, respectively, and assumed deposits of $2.08 billion. The Bank received approximately $70.8 million in cash from the FDIC and recorded a receivable for an additional $5.3 million expected to be received in 2010. The acquisition of ICB added three new bank branches in California.

 

In connection with the acquisition, the Bank entered into a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC under which the FDIC will reimburse the Bank for 80 percent of eligible losses up to $649 million with respect to covered assets and 95 percent of eligible losses in excess of $649 million.  The term of the loss share agreement is ten years for single family residential loans and seven years for all other loans. The expected reimbursements under the loss sharing agreement were recorded as an indemnification asset at their estimated fair value of $380.0 million at the acquisition date.  The difference between the fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset and the undiscounted cash flow the Bank expects to collect from the FDIC is accreted into noninterest income.

 

In the last three quarters of the seventh year, the Bank has the right, without FDIC consent, to sell up to $400 million of the remaining covered loans provided the properties securing those loans have a current independent appraisal which supports a loan-to-value ratio of 75 percent or more of the covered loans’ book value.

 

The Bank recognized a gain of $38.2 million on the acquisition in 2009. The gain represents the amount by which the fair value of the assets acquired and consideration received from the FDIC exceeds the liabilities assumed.

 

Note 3. Fair Value Measurements

 

ASC 820 defines fair value for financial reporting purposes as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly market transaction between market participants at the measurement date (reporting date).  Fair value is based on an exit price in the principal market or most advantageous market in which the reporting entity could transact.

 

For each asset and liability required to be reported at fair value, management has identified the unit of account and valuation premise to be applied for purposes of measuring fair value.  The unit of account is the level at which an asset or liability is aggregated or disaggregated for purposes of applying fair value measurement.  The valuation premise is a concept that determines whether an asset is measured on a standalone basis or in combination with other assets. The Company measures its assets and liabilities on a standalone basis then aggregates assets and liabilities with similar characteristics for disclosure purposes.

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

 

Management employs market standard valuation techniques in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities.  Inputs used in valuation techniques are based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.  The inputs used in valuation techniques are prioritized as follows:

 

Level 1—Quoted market prices in an active market for identical assets and liabilities.

 

Level 2—Observable inputs including quoted prices (other than Level 1) in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities and default rates, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

 

Level 3—Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available.

 

11



Table of Contents

 

Note 3. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

 

If the determination of fair value measurement for a particular asset or liability is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Management’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability measured.

 

The Company records securities available-for-sale, trading securities and derivative contracts at fair value on a recurring basis.  Certain other assets such as impaired loans, OREO, goodwill, customer-relationship intangibles and private equity investments are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  Nonrecurring fair value measurements typically involve assets that are periodically evaluated for impairment and for which any impairment is recorded in the period in which the remeasurement is performed.

 

The following tables summarize assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 by level in the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance as of
June 30, 2010

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
Level 1

 

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
Level 2

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Level 3

 

Measured on a Recurring Basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

19,145

 

$

19,145

 

$

 

$

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

1,090,846

 

 

1,090,846

 

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

466,713

 

 

466,713

 

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

2,528,237

 

 

2,528,237

 

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

217,078

 

 

217,078

 

 

State and municipal

 

360,422

 

 

360,422

 

 

Other debt securities

 

67,147

 

 

42,003

 

25,144

 

Equity securities and mutual funds

 

11,555

 

11,555

 

 

 

Trading securities

 

129,287

 

113,483

 

15,804

 

 

Mark-to-market derivatives (1)

 

60,619

 

4,976

 

55,643

 

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

4,951,049

 

$

149,159

 

$

4,776,746

 

$

25,144

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark-to-market derivatives (2)

 

$

31,736

 

$

1,629

 

$

30,107

 

$

 

Total liabilities at fair value

 

$

31,736

 

$

1,629

 

$

30,107

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collateral dependent impaired loans (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

$

2,996

 

$

 

$

2,746

 

$

250

 

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

35,656

 

 

21,243

 

14,413

 

Residential mortgages

 

7,364

 

 

6,985

 

379

 

Real estate construction

 

111,339

 

 

85,460

 

25,879

 

Other real estate owned (4)

 

50,797

 

 

43,592

 

7,205

 

Private equity investments

 

4,427

 

 

 

4,427

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

212,579

 

$

 

$

160,026

 

$

52,553

 

 


(1)

Reported in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

(2)

Reported in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

(3)

Impaired loans for which fair value was calculated using the collateral valuation method.

(4)

OREO balance of $153.3 million in the consolidated balance sheets includes $98.8 million of covered OREO and is net of estimated disposal costs.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

Note 3. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance as of
December 31, 2009

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
Level 1

 

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
Level 2

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Level 3

 

Measured on a Recurring Basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

73,597

 

$

73,597

 

$

 

$

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

656,721

 

 

656,721

 

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

555,157

 

 

555,157

 

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

2,306,111

 

 

2,306,111

 

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

241,329

 

 

241,329

 

 

State and municipal

 

378,639

 

 

378,639

 

 

Other debt securities

 

76,506

 

 

49,727

 

26,779

 

Equity securities and mutual funds

 

18,698

 

18,698

 

 

 

Trading securities

 

154,302

 

154,302

 

 

 

Mark-to-market derivatives (1)

 

52,309

 

5,335

 

46,974

 

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

4,513,369

 

$

251,932

 

$

4,234,658

 

$

26,779

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark-to-market derivatives (2)

 

$

14,577

 

$

1,080

 

$

13,497

 

$

 

Total liabilities at fair value

 

$

14,577

 

$

1,080

 

$

13,497

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collateral dependent impaired loans (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

$

450

 

$

 

$

450

 

$

 

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

54,212

 

 

34,302

 

19,910

 

Residential mortgages

 

8,112

 

 

7,726

 

386

 

Real estate construction

 

176,202

 

 

98,387

 

77,815

 

Equity lines of credit

 

912

 

 

912

 

 

Other real estate owned (4)

 

48,920

 

 

30,866

 

18,054

 

Private equity investments

 

4,374

 

 

 

4,374

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

293,182

 

$

 

$

172,643

 

$

120,539

 

 


(1)

Reported in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

(2)

Reported in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

(3)

Impaired loans for which fair value was calculated using the collateral valuation method.

(4)

OREO balance of $113.9 million in the consolidated balance sheets includes $60.6 million of covered OREO and is net of estimated disposal costs.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

Note 3. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance as of
June 30, 2009

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
Level 1

 

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
Level 2

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Level 3

 

Measured on a Recurring Basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

15,831

 

$

15,831

 

$

 

$

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

398,409

 

 

398,409

 

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

584,932

 

 

584,932

 

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

1,550,675

 

 

1,550,675

 

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

292,669

 

 

292,669

 

 

State and municipal

 

403,783

 

 

403,783

 

 

Other debt securities

 

64,968

 

 

39,543

 

25,425

 

Equity securities and mutual funds

 

19,059

 

19,059

 

 

 

Trading securities

 

138,137

 

102,802

 

33,532

 

1,803

 

Mark-to-market derivatives (1)

 

53,058

 

1,688

 

51,370

 

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

3,521,521

 

$

139,380

 

$

3,354,913

 

$

27,228

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark-to-market derivatives (2)

 

$

11,175

 

$

321

 

$

10,854

 

$

 

Total liabilities at fair value

 

$

11,175

 

$

321

 

$

10,854

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collateral dependent impaired loans (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

$

124

 

$

 

$

124

 

$

 

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

28,080

 

 

28,080

 

 

Residential mortgages

 

3,320

 

 

3,320

 

 

Real estate construction

 

150,832

 

 

150,832

 

 

Equity lines of credit

 

1,118

 

 

1,118

 

 

Other real estate owned (4)

 

19,554

 

 

19,554

 

 

Private equity investments

 

700

 

 

 

700

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

203,728

 

$

 

$

203,028

 

$

700

 

 


(1)

Reported in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

(2)

Reported in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

(3)

Impaired loans for which fair value was calculated using the collateral valuation method.

(4)

OREO balance of $18.1 million in the consolidated balance sheets is net of estimated disposal costs.

 

At June 30, 2010, $4.95 billion, or approximately 23 percent, of the Company’s total assets were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, compared with $4.51 billion or 21 percent at December 31, 2009, and $3.52 billion or 20 percent at June 30, 2009. The majority of these financial assets were valued using Level 1 or Level 2 inputs.  Less than a quarter of 1 percent of total assets was measured using Level 3 inputs.  Approximately $31.7 million, $14.6 million and $11.2 million of the Company’s total liabilities at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 1 or Level 2 inputs.  At June 30, 2010, $212.6 million, or approximately 1 percent of the Company’s total assets, were recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, compared with $293.2 million or 1 percent at December 31, 2009, and $203.7 million or 1 percent at June 30, 2009.  These assets were measured using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs.  There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

Note 3. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

 

For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the following table presents the total losses (gains), which include charge-offs, specific reserves, valuation write-downs, and net losses on sales of other real estate owned, recognized in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

 

 

 

Three months ended
June 30,

 

Six months ended
June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Collateral dependent impaired loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

$

4,279

 

$

925

 

$

6,896

 

$

4,835

 

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

141

 

3,256

 

17,448

 

3,256

 

Residential mortgages

 

353

 

871

 

1,206

 

871

 

Real estate construction

 

(125

)

33,377

 

10,120

 

45,452

 

Equity lines of credit

 

51

 

342

 

51

 

342

 

Other real estate owned

 

10,068

 

5,323

 

22,616

 

5,323

 

Private equity investments

 

30

 

403

 

428

 

403

 

Total losses recognized

 

$

14,797

 

$

44,497

 

$

58,765

 

$

60,482

 

 

Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis include CDO senior notes in the current and prior year periods, and CDO income notes in the first quarter of 2009 only, for which the market is inactive. The fair value of these securities is determined using an internal cash flow model that incorporates management’s assumptions about risk-adjusted discount rates, prepayment expectations, projected cash flows and collateral performance. These assumptions are not directly observable in the market. Unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale are reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) in the consolidated balance sheets. Activity in Level 3 assets measured on a recurring basis for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is summarized in the following table:

 

Level 3 Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis

 

 

 

June 30, 2010

 

June 30, 2009

 

(in thousands)

 

Securities
Available-for-Sale

 

Securities
Available-for-Sale

 

Trading
Securities

 

Total Level 3
Assets

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

26,779

 

$

32,419

 

$

 

$

32,419

 

Total realized/unrealized gains (losses):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in earnings

 

 

(9,282

)

(644

)

(9,926

)

Included in other comprehensive income

 

(1,358

)

5,285

 

 

5,285

 

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net

 

(277

)

(550

)

 

(550

)

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers between categories

 

 

(2,447

)

2,447

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

25,144

 

$

25,425

 

$

1,803

 

$

27,228

 

 

Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include certain collateral dependent impaired loans, OREO for which fair value is not solely based on market observable inputs, and certain private equity and alternative investments.  Non-observable inputs related to valuing loans and OREO may include adjustments to external appraised values based on an internally generated discounted cash flow analysis or management’s assumptions about market trends or other factors that are not directly observable. Private equity and alternative investments do not have readily determinable fair values. These investments are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment on a quarterly basis.  Due to the lack of readily determinable fair values for these investments, the impairment assessment is based primarily on a review of investment performance and the likelihood that the capital invested would be recovered.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

Note 3. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

A financial instrument is broadly defined as cash, evidence of an ownership interest in another entity, or a contract that imposes a contractual obligation on one entity and conveys a corresponding right to a second entity to require delivery or exchange of a financial instrument.  The table below summarizes the estimated fair values for the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009.  The disclosure does not include estimated fair value amounts for assets and liabilities which are not defined as financial instruments but which have significant value. These assets and liabilities include the value of customer-relationship intangibles, goodwill, and affordable housing investments carried at cost, other assets, deferred taxes and other liabilities. Accordingly, the total of the fair values presented does not represent the underlying value of the Company.

 

Following is a description of the methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair values for each class of financial instrument:

 

Cash and due from banks, Due from banks—interest bearing and Federal funds sold For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

 

Securities available-for-sale and Trading securities For securities held as available-for-sale, the fair value is determined by quoted market prices, where available, or on observable market inputs appropriate for the type of security. If quoted market prices or observable market inputs are not available, discounted cash flows may be used to determine an appropriate fair value. Fair value for trading securities are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. The fair value of CDO income notes was determined using a discounted cash flow model.

 

Loans and leases Loans are not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Nonrecurring fair value adjustments are periodically recorded on impaired loans that are measured for impairment based on the fair value of collateral. Due to the lack of activity in the secondary market for the types of loans in the Company’s portfolio, a model-based approach is used for determining the fair value of loans for purposes of the disclosures in the table below. The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using discount rates that incorporate the Company’s assumptions concerning current market yields, credit risk and liquidity premiums. Loan cash flow projections are based on contractual loan terms adjusted for the impact of current interest rate levels on borrower behavior, including prepayments. Loan prepayment assumptions are based on industry standards for the type of loans being valued. Projected cash flows are discounted using yield curves based on current market conditions. Yield curves are constructed by product type using the Bank’s loan pricing model for like-quality credits.  The discount rates used in the Company’s model represent the rates the Bank would offer to current borrowers for like-quality credits. These rates could be different from what other financial institutions could offer for these loans.

 

Covered loans The fair value of covered loans is based on estimates of future loan cash flows and appropriate discount rates, which incorporate the Company’s assumptions about market funding cost and liquidity premium. The estimates of future loan cash flows are determined using the Company’s assumptions concerning the amount and timing of principal and interest payments, prepayments and credit losses.

 

FDIC indemnification asset — The fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset was estimated by discounting estimated future cash flows based on estimated current market rates.

 

Derivative contracts The fair value of non-exchange traded (over-the-counter) derivatives are obtained from third party market sources.  The Company provides client data to the third party source for purposes of calculating the credit valuation component of the fair value measurement of client derivative contracts. The fair values of interest rate contracts include interest receivable and payable and cash collateral, if any.

 

Deposits The fair value of demand and interest checking deposits, savings deposits, and certain money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is determined by discounting expected future cash flows using the rates offered by the Bank for deposits of similar type and remaining maturity at the measurement date.  This value is compared to the termination value of each CD given the bank’s standard early withdrawal penalties. The fair value reported is the higher of the discounted present value of each CD and the termination value after the recovery of prepayment penalties. The Bank reviews pricing for its CD products weekly. This review gives consideration to market pricing for products of similar type and maturity offered by other financial institutions.

 

Federal funds purchased, Securities sold under repurchase agreements and Other short-term borrowings The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

 

16


 


Table of Contents

 

Note 3. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

 

Structured securities sold under repurchase agreements The fair value of structured repurchase agreements is based on market pricing for synthetic instruments with the same term and structure.  These values are validated against dealer quotes for similar instruments.

 

Subordinated and long-term debt The fair value of subordinated and long-term debt is obtained through third-party pricing sources.

 

Commitments to extend credit The fair value of these commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. The Company does not make fixed-rate loan commitments. The fair value of commitments to extend credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.

 

Commitments to private equity and affordable housing funds The fair value of commitments to invest in private equity and affordable housing funds is based on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligation.

 

The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 were as follows:

 

 

 

June 30, 2010

 

June 30, 2009

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

(in millions)

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Financial Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

$

184.3

 

$

184.3

 

$

350.9

 

$

350.9

 

Due from banks - interest bearing

 

336.2

 

336.2

 

205.6

 

205.6

 

Federal funds sold

 

404.8

 

404.8

 

125.0

 

125.0

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

4,761.1

 

4,761.1

 

3,330.3

 

3,330.3

 

Trading securities

 

129.3

 

129.3

 

138.1

 

138.1

 

Loans and leases, net of allowance

 

11,192.6

 

11,494.6

 

12,165.3

 

12,297.2

 

Covered loans, net of allowance

 

2,034.6

 

2,027.6

 

 

 

FDIC indemnification asset

 

394.0

 

389.0

 

 

 

Derivative contracts

 

60.6

 

60.6

 

53.1

 

53.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

$

17,972.9

 

$

17,977.1

 

$

14,498.3

 

$

14,502.6

 

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

2.7

 

2.7

 

116.4

 

116.4

 

Structured securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

175.0

 

185.3

 

200.0

 

208.7

 

Other short-term borrowings

 

0.7

 

0.7

 

50.0

 

50.0

 

Subordinated and long-term debt

 

811.0

 

842.7

 

395.9

 

367.5

 

Derivative contracts

 

31.7

 

31.7

 

11.2

 

11.2

 

Commitments to extend credit

 

7.1

 

21.0

 

 

13.2

 

Commitments to private equity and affordable housing funds

 

22.2

 

40.0

 

 

41.4

 

 

17



Table of Contents

 

Note 4. Investment Securities

 

The following is a summary of amortized cost and estimated fair value for the major categories of securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009:

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cost

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

Fair Value

 

June 30, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury.

 

$

19,096

 

$

50

 

$

(1

)

$

19,145

 

Federal agency - Debt.

 

1,084,703

 

6,432

 

(289

)

1,090,846

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

447,363

 

19,350

 

 

466,713

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

2,455,952

 

74,401

 

(2,116

)

2,528,237

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

234,330

 

1,753

 

(19,005

)

217,078

 

State and municipal

 

347,469

 

13,120

 

(167

)

360,422

 

Other debt securities

 

71,048

 

2,723

 

(6,624

)

67,147

 

Total debt securities

 

4,659,961

 

117,829

 

(28,202

)

4,749,588

 

Equity securities and mutual funds

 

8,128

 

3,427

 

 

11,555

 

Total securities

 

$

4,668,089

 

$

121,256

 

$

(28,202

)

$

4,761,143

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

73,597

 

$

2

 

$

(2

)

$

73,597

 

Federal agency - Debt.

 

659,716

 

651

 

(3,646

)

656,721

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

552,691

 

6,521

 

(4,055

)

555,157

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

2,294,676

 

23,641

 

(12,206

)

2,306,111

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

272,262

 

304

 

(31,237

)

241,329

 

State and municipal

 

368,454

 

10,915

 

(730

)

378,639

 

Other debt securities

 

82,163

 

1,093

 

(6,750

)

76,506

 

Total debt securities

 

4,303,559

 

43,127

 

(58,626

)

4,288,060

 

Equity securities and mutual funds

 

15,861

 

2,837

 

 

18,698

 

Total securities

 

$

4,319,420

 

$

45,964

 

$

(58,626

)

$

4,306,758

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

15,786

 

$

45

 

$

 

$

15,831

 

Federal agency - Debt.

 

397,859

 

1,417

 

(867

)

398,409

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

575,184

 

10,887

 

(1,139

)

584,932

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

1,542,507

 

16,712

 

(8,544

)

1,550,675

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

349,687

 

 

(57,018

)

292,669

 

State and municipal

 

398,584

 

7,042

 

(1,843

)

403,783

 

Other

 

76,252

 

235

 

(11,519

)

64,968

 

Total debt securities

 

3,355,859

 

36,338

 

(80,930

)

3,311,267

 

Equity securities and mutual funds

 

17,317

 

1,742

 

 

19,059

 

Total securities

 

$

3,373,176

 

$

38,080

 

$

(80,930

)

$

3,330,326

 

 

Proceeds from sales of securities were $24.4 million and $432.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with $167.9 million and $446.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.  The following table provides the gross realized gains and losses on the sales of securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Gross realized gains

 

$

491

 

$

3,432

 

$

4,993

 

$

8,664

 

Gross realized losses

 

(136

)

(151

)

(2,504

)

(8,314

)

Net realized gains

 

$

355

 

$

3,281

 

$

2,489

 

$

350

 

 

18



Table of Contents

 

Note 4. Investment Securities (Continued)

 

Impairment Assessment

 

The Company performs a quarterly assessment of the debt and equity securities in its investment portfolio that have an unrealized loss to determine whether the decline in the fair value of these securities below their cost is other-than-temporary.  Impairment is considered other-than-temporary when it becomes probable that an investor will be unable to recover the cost of an investment. The Company’s impairment assessment takes into consideration factors such as the extent to which the market value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer including events specific to the issuer or industry; defaults or deferrals of scheduled interest, principal or dividend payments; external credit ratings and recent downgrades; and whether the Company intends to sell the security and whether it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis.  If a decline in fair value is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value which then becomes the new cost basis.  The new cost basis is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value.

 

In accordance with ASC 320-35, Investments—Debt and Equity Securities—Subsequent Measurement, when there are credit losses associated with an impaired debt security and the Company does not have the intent to sell the security and it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, the Company will separate the amount of the impairment into the amount that is credit-related and the amount related to non-credit factors. The credit-related impairment is recognized in Net impairment loss recognized in earnings in the consolidated statements of income. The non-credit-related impairment is recognized in AOCI.

 

Securities Deemed to be Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired

 

Through the impairment assessment process, the Company determined that certain investments were other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010.  The Company recorded impairment losses in earnings on securities available-for-sale of $0.5 million and $1.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  Of the Company’s total other-than-temporary impairment losses, $13.5 million related to non-credit-related impairment and was recorded in AOCI.  The Company recorded impairment losses in earnings on securities available-for-sale of $1.5 million and $13.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

 

The following table provides total impairment losses recognized in earnings on other-than-temporarily impaired securities:

 

(in thousands)
Impairment Losses on

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired Securities

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Non-agency CMOs

 

$

212

 

$

1,537

 

$

1,215

 

$

1,537

 

Collateralized debt obligation income notes

 

 

 

 

9,282

 

Perpetual preferred stock

 

294

 

 

294

 

1,124

 

Mutual funds

 

 

 

 

1,630

 

Total

 

$

506

 

$

1,537

 

$

1,509

 

$

13,573

 

 

19



Table of Contents

 

Note 4. Investment Securities (Continued)

 

The following table provides a rollforward of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings for debt securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Credit-related other-than-temporary impairment that was recognized in earnings during the three and six months ending June 30, 2010 is reflected as an “Initial credit-related impairment” if the current period is the first time the security had a credit impairment. A credit related other-than-temporary impairment is reflected as a “Subsequent credit-related impairment” if the current period is not the first time the security had a credit impairment.

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

18,710

 

$

13,298

 

$

17,707

 

$

8,083

 

Subsequent credit-related impairment

 

186

 

 

1,189

 

5,215

 

Initial credit-related impairment

 

26

 

1,537

 

26

 

1,537

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

18,922

 

$

14,835

 

$

18,922

 

$

14,835

 

 

Non-Agency CMOs

 

During the second quarter of 2010, the Company identified certain non-agency collateralized mortgage obligation securities (“CMOs”) that were considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired because the present value of expected cash flows was less than cost. These CMOs have a fixed interest rate for an initial period after which they become variable-rate instruments with annual rate resets. For purposes of projecting future cash flows, the current fixed coupon was used through the reset date for each security. The prevailing LIBOR/Treasury forward curve as of the measurement date was used to project all future floating-rate cash flows based on the characteristics of each security.  Other factors considered in the projection of future cash flows include the current level of subordination from other CMO classes, anticipated prepayment rates, cumulative defaults and loss given default. The Company concluded that the shortfall in expected cash flows represented a credit loss and recognized impairment losses in earnings totaling $0.2 million on its investments in CMOs in the second quarter. The Company has recognized credit losses totaling $1.2 million on its investments in non-agency CMOs year-to-date. The remaining other-than-temporary impairment for these securities was recognized in AOCI. This non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment is attributed to external market conditions, primarily the lack of liquidity in these securities and increases in interest rates.

 

Perpetual Preferred Stock

 

The adjusted cost basis of the Company’s investment in perpetual preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae was $0.3 million at June 30, 2010.  During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a $0.3 million impairment loss to adjust the costs basis of its investment to fair value.  The Company previously recorded a $1.1 million impairment loss in 2009 and $21.9 million impairment loss in 2008 following the action taken by the Federal Housing Agency to place these government-sponsored agencies into conservatorship and eliminating the dividends on their preferred shares.

 

20



Table of Contents

 

Note 4. Investment Securities (Continued)

 

The following tables provide a summary of the gross unrealized losses and fair value of investment securities aggregated by investment category and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.  The tables include investments for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized in earnings, along with investments that had a non-credit-related impairment recognized in AOCI:

 

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

12 months or greater

 

Total

 

(in thousands)

 

Fair Value

 

Estimated
Unrealized
Loss

 

Fair Value

 

Estimated
Unrealized
Loss

 

Fair Value

 

Estimated
Unrealized
Loss

 

June 30, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

4,029

 

$

1

 

$

 

$

 

$

4,029

 

$

1

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

50,516

 

289

 

 

 

50,516

 

289

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

293,008

 

2,116

 

 

 

293,008

 

2,116

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

24,327

 

455

 

124,892

 

18,550

 

149,219

 

19,005

 

State and municipal

 

2,810

 

57

 

4,645

 

110

 

7,455

 

167

 

Other debt securities

 

4,585

 

31

 

16,933

 

6,593

 

21,518

 

6,624

 

Total securities

 

$

379,275

 

$

2,949

 

$

146,470

 

$

25,253

 

$

525,745

 

$

28,202

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

59,995

 

$

2

 

$

 

$

 

$

59,995

 

$

2

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

437,548

 

3,646

 

 

 

437,548

 

3,646

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

285,328

 

4,055

 

 

 

285,328

 

4,055

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

634,732

 

12,206

 

 

 

634,732

 

12,206

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

35,192

 

428

 

180,699

 

30,809

 

215,891

 

31,237

 

State and municipal

 

18,187

 

340

 

4,500

 

390

 

22,687

 

730

 

Other debt securities

 

 

 

36,315

 

6,750

 

36,315

 

6,750

 

Total securities

 

$

1,470,982

 

$

20,677

 

$

221,514

 

$

37,949

 

$

1,692,496

 

$

58,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

$

109,193

 

$

867

 

$

 

$

 

$

109,193

 

$

867

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

125,930

 

1,139

 

 

 

125,930

 

1,139

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

585,654

 

8,544

 

 

 

585,654

 

8,544

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

25,355

 

4,674

 

267,314

 

52,344

 

292,669

 

57,018

 

State and municipal

 

58,795

 

965

 

10,382

 

878

 

69,177

 

1,843

 

Other debt securities

 

4,368

 

154

 

53,977

 

11,365

 

58,345

 

11,519

 

Total securities

 

$

909,295

 

$

16,343

 

$

331,673

 

$

64,587

 

$

1,240,968

 

$

80,930

 

 

At June 30, 2010, total securities available-for-sale had a fair value of $4.76 billion, which included $525.7 million of securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2010.  This balance consists of $473.4 million of temporarily impaired securities and $52.3 million of securities that had non-credit related impairment recognized in AOCI.  At June 30, 2010, the Company had 50 debt securities in an unrealized loss position.  The debt securities in an unrealized loss position include 1 U.S. Treasury note, 1 Federal agency debt securities, 16 Federal agency CMOs, 21 private label CMOs, 9 state and municipal securities and 2 other debt securities.

 

The largest component of the unrealized loss at June 30, 2010 was $19.0 million related to non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations. The Company monitors the performance of the mortgages underlying these bonds. Collateral performance generally improved in the second quarter, though there was some additional deterioration in select securities which gave rise to additional credit impairment charges. The Company only holds the most senior tranches of each issue which provides protection against defaults. The Company attributes the unrealized loss on CMOs held largely to the current absence of liquidity in this sector of the credit markets. Other than the $1.2 million year-to-date credit loss discussed in Non-Agency CMOs above, the Company expects to receive all contractual principal and interest payments due on its CMO debt securities.  Additionally, the Company does not intend to sell the securities, and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the securities before it recovers the cost basis of its investment. The mortgages in these asset pools are relatively large and have been made to borrowers with strong credit history and significant equity invested in their homes. They are well diversified geographically.

 

21



Table of Contents

 

Note 4. Investment Securities (Continued)

 

Nonetheless, significant further weakening of economic fundamentals coupled with significant increases in unemployment and substantial deterioration in the value of high-end residential properties could extend distress to this borrower population. This could increase default rates and put additional pressure on property values. Should these conditions occur, the value of these securities could decline and trigger the recognition of further other-than-temporary impairment charges.

 

Other debt securities include the Company’s investments in highly rated corporate debt and collateralized bond obligations backed by trust preferred securities (“CDOs”) issued by a geographically diverse pool of small- and medium-sized financial institutions.  Liquidity pressures in 2008 and in 2009 caused a general decline in the value of corporate debt.  The CDOs held in securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2010 are the most senior tranches of each issue. The market for CDOs has been inactive since 2008, therefore, the fair values of these securities were determined using an internal pricing model that incorporates assumptions about discount rates in an illiquid market, projected cash flows and collateral performance. The CDOs had a $6.6 million gross unrealized loss at June 30, 2010 which the Company attributes to the illiquid credit markets. The CDOs have collateral that exceeds the outstanding debt by over 29 percent at June 30, 2010.  Security valuations reflect the current and prospective performance of the issuers whose debt is contained in these asset pools. The Company expects to receive all contractual principal and interest payments due on its CDOs. Additionally, the Company does not intend to sell the securities, and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the securities before it recovers the cost basis of its investment.

 

The Company does not consider the debt securities in the table above to be other than temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010.

 

At December 31, 2009, total securities available-for-sale had a fair value of $4.31 billion, which included $1.69 billion of securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2009.  This balance consisted of $1.65 billion of temporarily impaired securities and $43.5 million of securities that had non-credit related impairment recognized in AOCI.  At December 31, 2009, the Company had 155 debt securities in an unrealized loss position. The debt securities in an unrealized loss position included 1 U.S. Treasury bill, 15 Federal agency debt securities, 30 Federal agency MBS, 44 Federal agency CMOs, 29 private label CMOs, 32 state and municipal securities and 4 other debt securities.

 

At June 30, 2009, total securities available-for-sale had a fair value of $3.33 billion, which included $1.24 billion of securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2009.  This balance consisted of $1.20 billion of temporarily impaired securities and $40.4 million of securities that had non-credit related impairment recognized in AOCI.  At June 30, 2009, the Company had 181 debt securities in an unrealized loss position. The debt securities in an unrealized loss position included 5 Federal agency securities, 10 Federal agency MBS, 32 Federal agency CMOs, 33 private label CMOs, 91 state and municipal securities and 10 other debt securities.

 

The following table provides the expected remaining maturities of debt securities included in the securities portfolio as of June 30, 2010, except for mortgage-backed securities which are allocated according to the average life of expected cash flows. Average expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because mortgage debt issuers may have the right to repay obligations prior to contractual maturity.

 

Debt Securities Available-for-Sale

 

(in thousands)

 

One year or
less

 

Over 1 year
through
5 years

 

Over 5 years
through
10 years

 

Over 10 years

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

14,072

 

$

5,073

 

$

 

$

 

$

19,145

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

870,162

 

220,684

 

 

 

1,090,846

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

335

 

155,355

 

282,765

 

28,258

 

466,713

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

228,130

 

1,848,610

 

438,514

 

12,983

 

2,528,237

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

21,903

 

133,846

 

61,329

 

 

217,078

 

State and municipal

 

32,978

 

155,900

 

121,138

 

50,406

 

360,422

 

Other

 

10,210

 

9,934

 

47,003

 

 

67,147

 

Total debt securities

 

$

1,177,790

 

$

2,529,402

 

$

950,749

 

$

91,647

 

$

4,749,588

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortized cost

 

$

1,170,255

 

$

2,462,359

 

$

937,619

 

$

89,728

 

$

4,659,961

 

 

22



Table of Contents

 

Note 5.  Other Investments

 

Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock

 

The Company’s investment in stock issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”) and Federal Reserve (“FRB”) totaled $128.1 million at June 30, 2010 compared to $123.2 million at December 31, 2009, and $54.2 million at June 30, 2009.  Ownership of government agency securities is restricted to member banks, and the securities do not have readily determinable market values. The Company records investments in FHLB and FRB stock at cost in Other assets of the consolidated balance sheets and evaluates these investments for impairment.

 

At June 30, 2010, the Company held $97.3 million of FHLB stock.  FHLB banks are cooperatives that provide products and services to member banks. The FHLB provides significant liquidity to the U.S. banking system through advances to its member banks in exchange for collateral. The purchase of stock is required in order to receive advances and other services. The Company completed an assessment of its investment in FHLB stock for impairment at June 30, 2010.  Since 2009, the FHLB has experienced higher levels of other-than-temporary impairment in its investments in private label mortgage-backed securities due to continued weakness in the housing market. The FHLB has taken steps to preserve capital and increase the balance of restricted retained earnings available to protect members’ paid-in-capital from the effects of adverse credit events, and its capital-to-assets ratio was well above regulatory requirements at June 30, 2010.  Additionally, the FHLB has access to a high level of government support to maintain liquidity and access to funding. The Company expects to recover the full amount invested in FHLB stock and does not consider its investment to be impaired at June 30, 2010.

 

Private Equity and Alternative Investments

 

The Company has ownership interests in a limited number of private equity, venture capital, real estate and hedge funds that are not publicly traded and do not have readily determinable fair values. These investments are carried at cost in the Other assets section of the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s investments in these funds totaled $37.5 million at June 30, 2010, $37.4 million at December 31, 2009 and $38.7 million at June 30, 2009. A summary of investments by fund type is provided below:

 

(in thousands)

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

June 30,

 

Fund Type

 

2010

 

2009

 

2009

 

Private equity and venture capital

 

$

22,054

 

$

22,530

 

$

21,665

 

Real estate

 

9,545

 

8,148

 

10,133

 

Hedge

 

2,670

 

2,700

 

2,700

 

Other

 

3,198

 

4,038

 

4,192

 

Total

 

$

37,467

 

$

37,416

 

$

38,690

 

 

Management reviews these investments quarterly for impairment. The impairment assessment includes a review of the most recent financial statements and investment reports for each fund and discussions with fund management. An impairment loss is recognized if it is deemed probable that the Company will not recover the cost of an investment. The impairment loss is recognized in Other noninterest income in the consolidated income statements. The new cost basis of the investment is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in value.

 

23



Table of Contents

 

Note 5.  Other Investments (Continued)

 

The Company recognized impairment totaling $30 thousand and $0.4 million on its investments in four funds during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  The Company recognized $0.4 million of impairment on private equity and hedge fund investments for the same periods in 2009. The table below provides information as of June 30, 2010 on private equity and alternative investments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis due to the recognition of impairment:

 

Alternative Investments Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

(in thousands)
Fund Type

 

Fair
Value

 

Unfunded
Commitments

 

Redemption
Frequency

 

Redemption
Notice Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Private equity and venture capital (2)

 

$

743

 

$

45

 

None (1)

 

N/A

 

Real estate (3)

 

3,014

 

1,411

 

None (1)

 

N/A

 

Hedge (4)

 

670

 

 

(4)

 

65 days

 

Total

 

$

4,427

 

$

1,456

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)

Fund makes periodic distributions of income but does not permit redemptions prior to the end of the investment term.

 

 

(2)

Fund invests in securities and other instruments of public and private companies, including corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies and joint ventures.

 

 

(3)

Fund invests in commercial, industrial and retail projects and select multi-family housing opportunities which are part of mixed use projects in low and moderate income neighborhoods.

 

 

(4)

Fund invests in hedge funds and other investment opportunities that may include funds with extended lock up periods, private equity funds, real estate funds or direct investments in private companies. Redemptions are subject to gates that restrict aggregate redemptions.

 

Note 6. Loans, Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, and Reserve for Off-Balance Sheet Credit Commitments

 

The following is a summary of the major categories of loans:

 

Loans and Leases

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2009

 

Commercial

 

$

3,935,544

 

$

4,335,052

 

$

4,375,161

 

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

2,078,003

 

2,161,451

 

2,162,294

 

Residential mortgages

 

3,577,894

 

3,533,453

 

3,511,598

 

Real estate construction

 

629,902

 

835,589

 

1,116,154

 

Equity lines of credit

 

742,071

 

734,182

 

691,226

 

Installment loans

 

169,070

 

172,566

 

175,315

 

Lease financing

 

350,560

 

374,615

 

389,594

 

Loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

11,483,044

 

12,146,908

 

12,421,342

 

Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses

 

(290,492

)

(288,493

)

(256,018

)

Loans and leases, excluding covered loans, net

 

11,192,552

 

11,858,415

 

12,165,324

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans

 

2,080,846

 

1,851,821

 

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses

 

(46,255

)

 

 

Covered loans, net

 

2,034,591

 

1,851,821

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans and leases

 

$

13,563,890

 

$

13,998,729

 

$

12,421,342

 

Total loans and leases, net

 

$

13,227,143

 

$

13,710,236

 

$

12,165,324

 

 

24



Table of Contents

 

Note 6. Loans, Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, and Reserve for Off-Balance Sheet Credit Commitments (Continued)

 

The Company’s lending activities are predominantly in California, and to a lesser extent, New York and Nevada. Excluding covered loans, at June 30, 2010, California represented 88 percent of total loans outstanding and Nevada and New York represented 2 percent and 4 percent, respectively.  The remaining 6 percent of total loans outstanding represented other states. Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of clients are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of the loan portfolio and credit performance depends on the economic stability of Southern California. Credit performance also depends, to a lesser extent, on economic conditions in the San Francisco Bay area, New York and Nevada.

 

Covered Loans

 

Covered loans represent loans acquired from the FDIC that are subject to loss sharing agreements and were $2.08 billion at June 30, 2010 and $1.85 billion as of December 31, 2009.  Covered loans, net of allowance for loan losses, were $2.03 billion as of June 30, 2010.  The increase in covered loans from December 31, 2009 was due to loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisitions of FPB and SWB in the second quarter of 2010.

 

The Company evaluated the acquired loans from ICB, FPB and SWB and concluded that all loans, with the exception of a small population of acquired loans, would be accounted for under ASC 310-30.  Loans are accounted for under ASC 310-30 when there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually required payments. Total covered loans of $2.08 billion as of June 30, 2010 consist of acquired impaired loans of $2.07 billion that are within the scope of ASC 310-30 and $10.4 million of acquired loans that are outside the scope of ASC 310-30.

 

As of the respective acquisition dates, the preliminary estimates of the contractually required payments receivable for all acquired impaired loans of FPB and SWB were $643.3 million, the cash flows expected to be collected were $378.9 million, and the fair value of the loans was $330.6 million.  These amounts were determined based on the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans, which included the effects of estimated prepayments. Fair value of the acquired loans include estimated credit losses, therefore, an allowance for loan losses is not recorded on the acquisition date.  Interest income is recognized on all acquired impaired loans through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and their expected cash flows.  Certain amounts related to the acquired loans are preliminary estimates and adjustments to these amounts may occur as the Company finalizes its analysis of these loans.

 

Changes in the accretable yield for acquired impaired loans were as follows for the period from January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010:

 

(in thousands)

 

Accretable
Yield

 

Balance at January 1, 2010

 

$

687,126

 

Additions

 

48,644

 

Accretion

 

(58,776

)

Reclassifications to nonaccretable yield

 

(114,883

)

Disposals and other

 

5,926

 

Balance at June 30, 2010

 

$

568,037

 

 

Because of the short time period between the closing of the ICB acquisition and year-end 2009, certain 2009 amounts related to the acquired impaired ICB loans were preliminary estimates. In finalizing its analysis of these loans, the Company recorded adjustments to 2009 amounts that are reflected in the Disposals and other line of the above table.

 

25



Table of Contents

 

Note 6. Loans, Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, and Reserve for Off-Balance Sheet Credit Commitments (Continued)

 

Covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are generally considered accruing and performing loans as the loans accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are reasonably estimable. Accordingly, acquired impaired loans that are contractually past due are still considered to be accruing and performing loans. If the timing and amount of future cash flows is not reasonably estimable, the loans may be classified as nonaccrual loans and interest income is not recognized until the timing and amount of future cash flows can be reasonably estimated. As of June 30, 2010, there were no nonaccrual covered loans.

 

The allowance for loan losses on covered loans was $46.3 million as of June 30, 2010.  In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a provision expense of $46.5 million on covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 as a result of a decrease in projected interest cash flows due to the Company’s revised default forecasts, though the principal credit loss projections are expected to be in line with initial expectations.  The revisions of the default forecasts in the second quarter were based on the results of management’s review of the credit quality of the covered loans and the analysis of the loan performance data since the acquisition of covered loans.  The Company will continue updating the cash flow projections on a quarterly basis.

 

At acquisition date, the Company recorded an FDIC indemnification asset for its FDIC-assisted acquisition of ICB in December 2009 and FPB and SWB in May 2010.  The FDIC indemnification asset represents the present value of the expected reimbursement from the FDIC related to expected losses on acquired loans and OREO. The FDIC indemnification asset from all three acquisitions was $394.0 million at June 30, 2010. See Note 2, Business Combination, for further discussion of the FDIC indemnification asset.

 

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Reserve for Off-Balance Sheet Credit Commitments

 

The following is a summary of activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses on non-covered loans and reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments:

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Allowance for loan and lease losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

292,799

 

$

241,586

 

$

288,493

 

$

224,046

 

Provision for credit losses

 

32,000

 

70,000

 

87,000

 

120,000

 

Transfers (to) from reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments

 

(812

)

1,122

 

(1,970

)

2,281

 

Charge-offs

 

(36,151

)

(57,842

)

(86,589

)

(92,304

)

Recoveries

 

2,656

 

1,152

 

3,558

 

1,995

 

Net loans charged-off

 

(33,495

)

(56,690

)

(83,031

)

(90,309

)

Balance, end of period

 

$

290,492

 

$

256,018

 

$

290,492

 

$

256,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

18,498

 

$

21,544

 

$

17,340

 

$

22,703

 

Provision for credit losses/transfers

 

812

 

(1,122

)

1,970

 

(2,281

)

Balance, end of period

 

$

19,310

 

$

20,422

 

$

19,310

 

$

20,422

 

 

26



Table of Contents

 

Note 6. Loans, Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, and Reserve for Off-Balance Sheet Credit Commitments (Continued)

 

Nonaccrual loans were $260.1 million at June 30, 2010, $388.7 million at December 31, 2009 and $378.3 million at June 30, 2009. Total impaired loans were $262.0 million at June 30, 2010, $375.7 million at December 31, 2009 and $365.3 million at June 30, 2009.  At June 30, 2010, there were $251.8 million of impaired loans included in nonaccrual loans, with an allowance allocation of $26.5 million. The remaining $8.3 million of nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2010 are loans under $500,000 that are not individually evaluated for impairment. Impaired loans with commitments of less than $500,000 are aggregated for the purpose of measuring impairment using historical loss factors as a means of measurement. At December 31, 2009, there were $375.7 million of impaired loans which had an allowance of $55.8 million allocated to them.  At June 30, 2009, there were $365.3 million of impaired loans which had an allowance of $51.6 million allocated to them.  The average balance of impaired loans was $290.5 million and $318.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  Interest income is not recognized on impaired loans until the principal balances of these loans are paid off.

 

Troubled debt restructured loans were $27.5 million, before specific reserves of $3.9 million, at June 30, 2010. Troubled debt restructured loans were $11.2 million, before specific reserves of $1.0 million, at December 31, 2009. At June 30, 2009, the Company had no troubled debt restructured loans. There were no related commitments to lend additional funds on restructured loans at June 30, 2010.

 

Note 7. Other Real Estate Owned

 

At June 30, 2010, OREO was $153.3 million and included $98.8 million of covered OREO.  Covered OREO represents OREO covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements in the acquisitions of ICB, FPB and SWB.  At December 31, 2009, OREO was $113.9 million and included $60.6 million of covered OREO. At June 30, 2009, OREO was $18.1 million.  Excluding covered OREO, the Company recognized additions of $6.0 million, sales of $2.2 million, and valuation write-downs of $7.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized additions of $27.1 million, sales of $7.6 million, and valuation write-downs of $18.4 million.

 

Covered OREO expenses and valuation write-downs are recorded in the noninterest expense section of the consolidated statements of income.  Under the loss sharing agreements, 80 percent of covered OREO expenses and valuation write-downs are reimbursable to the Company from the FDIC.  The portion of these expenses that are reimbursable is recorded in FDIC loss sharing income, net in the noninterest income section of the consolidated statements of income.

 

Note 8. Shareholders’ Equity

 

There were no purchases by the Company of equity securities that are registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the six-month period ended June 30, 2010.

 

At June 30, 2010, the Corporation had 1.1 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance and 0.7 million shares of unvested restricted stock granted to employees and directors under share-based compensation programs.

 

On November 21, 2008, the Corporation received aggregate proceeds of $400 million from the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in exchange for 400,000 shares of cumulative perpetual preferred stock and a 10-year warrant to purchase up to 1,128,668 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $53.16 per share. The preferred stock and warrant were recorded in equity on a relative fair value basis at the time of issuance. The preferred stock was valued by calculating the present value of expected cash flows and the warrant was valued using an option valuation model.  The allocated values of the preferred stock and warrant were approximately $389.9 million and $10.1 million, respectively. Cumulative dividends on the preferred stock were payable quarterly at the rate of 5 percent for the first five years and increasing to 9 percent thereafter.  The warrant has a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an exercise price, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, equal to $53.16 per share of the common stock.

 

27



Table of Contents

 

Note 8. Shareholders’ Equity (Continued)

 

In December 2009, the Corporation repurchased $200 million, or 200,000 shares, of the TARP preferred stock that it had sold to the Treasury.  On March 3, 2010, the Corporation repurchased the remaining $200 million, or 200,000 shares, of TARP preferred stock. The repurchase on March 3, 2010 resulted in a one-time, after-tax, non-cash charge of $3.8 million.

 

On April 8, 2010, the Corporation repurchased its outstanding common stock warrant issued to the Treasury during the Corporation’s participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The repurchase price of $18.5 million was recorded as a charge to additional paid-in capital.

 

Note 9. Earnings per Common Share

 

The Company applies the two-class method of computing basic and diluted EPS.  Under the two-class method, EPS is determined for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company grants restricted shares under a share-based compensation plan that qualify as participating securities.

 

The computation of basic and diluted EPS is presented in the following table:

 

 

 

For the three months
ended June 30,

 

For the six months
ended June 30,

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Basic EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to City National Corporation

 

$

41,318

 

$

6,773

 

$

57,016

 

$

14,233

 

Less: Dividends on preferred stock

 

 

5,501

 

5,702

 

11,002

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

41,318

 

$

1,272

 

$

51,314

 

$

3,231

 

Less: Earnings allocated to participating securities

 

535

 

55

 

635

 

143

 

Earning allocated to common shareholders

 

$

40,783

 

$

1,217

 

$

50,679

 

$

3,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

52,012

 

50,416

 

51,852

 

49,028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

0.78

 

$

0.02

 

$

0.98

 

$

0.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings allocated to common shareholders (1)

 

$

40,787

 

$

1,217

 

$

50,684

 

$

3,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

52,012

 

50,416

 

51,852

 

49,028

 

Dilutive effect of equity awards

 

530

 

135

 

484

 

110

 

Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding

 

52,542

 

50,551

 

52,336

 

49,138

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

0.78

 

$

0.02

 

$

0.97

 

$

0.06

 

 


(1)         Earnings allocated to common shareholders for basic and diluted EPS may differ under the two-class method as a result of adding common stock equivalents for options and warrants to dilutive shares outstanding, which alters the ratio used to allocate earnings to common shareholders and participating securities for the purposes of calculating diluted EPS.

 

The average price of the Company’s common stock for the period is used to determine the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and common stock warrant. Antidilutive stock options and common stock warrant are not included in the calculation of basic or diluted EPS. There were 1.5 million average outstanding stock options that were antidilutive for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and an average 0.1 million warrant compared to 3.3 million outstanding stock options and a 1.1 million warrant that were antidilutive for the same period in 2009.  On April 7, 2010, the Company repurchased the common stock warrant.  There were 2.2 million average outstanding stock options and an average 0.6 million common stock warrant that were antidilutive for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to 3.6 million outstanding stock options and a 1.1 million warrant that were antidilutive for the same period in 2009.

 

28



Table of Contents

 

Note 10. Share-Based Compensation

 

On June 30, 2010, the Company had one share-based compensation plan, the City National Corporation 2008 Omnibus Plan (the “Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s shareholders on April 23, 2008.  No new awards will be granted under predecessor plans.  A description of the Plan is provided below. The compensation cost that has been recognized for all share-based awards was $4.2 million and $8.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $3.7 million and $7.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The Company received $17.8 million and $0.5 million in cash for the exercise of stock options during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The tax benefit recognized for share-based compensation arrangements in equity was $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with tax expense of $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

 

Plan Description

 

The Plan permits the grant of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance share units, performance units and stock appreciation rights, or any combination thereof, to the Company’s eligible employees and non-employee directors.  No grants of performance shares, performance share units, performance units or stock appreciation rights had been made as of June 30, 2010. The purpose of the Plan is to promote the success of the Company by providing an additional means to attract, motivate, retain and reward key employees of the Company with awards and incentives for high levels of individual performance and improved financial performance of the Company, and to link non-employee director compensation to shareholder interests through equity grants. Stock option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant.  These awards vest in four years and have 10-year contractual terms. Restricted stock awards granted under the Plan vest over a period of at least three years, as determined by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee (“Committee”). The participant is entitled to dividends and voting rights for all shares issued even though they are not vested. Restricted stock awards issued under predecessor plans vest over five years. The Plan provides for acceleration of vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the Plan) or a termination of service, which may include disability or death. Unvested options are forfeited upon termination of employment, except for those instances noted above, and the case of the retirement of a retirement-age employee for options granted prior to January 31, 2006. The Company generally issues treasury shares upon share option exercises.  All unexercised options expire 10 years from the grant date. At June 30, 2010, there were approximately 1.1 million shares available for future grants.

 

Fair Value

 

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation methodology that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The Company evaluates exercise behavior and values options separately for executive and non-executive employees.  Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock.  The Company uses a 20-year look back period to calculate the volatility factor.  The length of the look back period reduces the impact of the recent disruptions in the capital markets, and provides values that management believes are more representative of expected future volatility. The Company uses historical data to predict option exercise and employee termination behavior. The expected term of options granted is derived from historical exercise activity and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield is equal to the dividend yield of the Company’s stock at the time of the grant.

 

To estimate the fair value of stock option awards, the Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation method, which incorporates the assumptions summarized in the table below:

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Weighted-average volatility

 

31.38

%

31.44

%

31.41

%

31.42

%

Dividend yield

 

0.69

%

1.09

%

0.73

%

3.51

%

Expected term (in years)

 

5.80

 

5.74

 

6.08

 

6.10

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.83

%

3.29

%

2.99

%

2.81

%

 

29



Table of Contents

 

Note 10. Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

 

Using the Black-Scholes methodology, the weighted-average grant-date fair values of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $16.86 and $6.50, respectively.  The total intrinsic values of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $9.0 million and $125 thousand, respectively.

 

A summary of option activity and related information under the Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is presented below:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Aggregate

 

Average

 

 

 

Number of

 

Exercise

 

Intrinsic

 

Remaining

 

 

 

Shares

 

Price

 

Value

 

Contractual

 

Options

 

(in thousands)

 

(per share)

 

(in thousands) (1)

 

Term

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2010

 

4,862

 

$

49.64

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

539

 

50.28

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(493

)

36.03

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

(97

)

45.05

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at June 30, 2010

 

4,811

 

$

51.19

 

$

30,895

 

5.90

 

Exercisable at June 30, 2010

 

3,033

 

$

56.54

 

$

10,703

 

4.27

 

 


(1) Includes in-the-money options only.

 

A summary of changes in unvested options and related information for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is presented below:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

Number of

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

Shares

 

Fair Value

 

Unvested Options

 

(in thousands)

 

(per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unvested at January 1, 2010

 

1,861

 

$

10.14

 

Granted

 

539

 

16.86

 

Vested

 

(541

)

12.11

 

Forfeited

 

(81

)

11.02

 

Unvested at June 30, 2010

 

1,778

 

$

11.54

 

 

The number of options vested during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were 540,653 and 415,304, respectively.  The total fair value of options vested during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $6.5 million and $6.7 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, there was $16.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under the Company’s plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.

 

30



Table of Contents

 

Note 10. Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

 

The Plan provides for granting of restricted shares of Company stock to employees. In general, twenty-five percent of the restricted stock vests two years from the date of grant, then twenty-five percent vests on each of the next three consecutive grant anniversary dates. The restricted stock is subject to forfeiture until the restrictions lapse or terminate.  A summary of changes in restricted stock and related information for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is presented below:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

Number of

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

Shares

 

Fair Value

 

Restricted Stock

 

(in thousands)

 

(per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unvested at January 1, 2010

 

610

 

$

46.79

 

Granted

 

209

 

50.55

 

Vested

 

(110

)

66.92

 

Forfeited

 

(26

)

44.94

 

Unvested at June 30, 2010

 

683

 

$

44.78

 

 

Restricted stock is valued at the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of award.  The weighted-average grant-date fair values of restricted stock granted during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $50.55 and $27.48, respectively. The number of restricted shares vested during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were 110,071 and 95,007, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock vested during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $7.4 million and $6.7 million, respectively.  The compensation expense related to restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $4.0 million and $3.7 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock granted under the Company’s plans was $21.4 million. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.2 years.

 

31



Table of Contents

 

Note 11. Derivative Instruments

 

The following table summarizes the fair value and balance sheet classification of derivative instruments as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009.  The notional amount of the contract is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets, but is used as the basis for determining the amount of interest payments to be exchanged between the counterparties.  If a counterparty fails to perform, the Company’s counterparty credit risk is equal to the amount reported as a derivative asset.

 

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

June 30, 2010

 

June 30, 2009

 

(in millions)

 

Notional
Amount

 

Derivative
Assets (1)

 

Derivative
Liabilities (1)

 

Notional
Amount

 

Derivative
Assets (1)

 

Derivative
Liabilities (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps - fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

 

$

10.0

 

$

0.5

 

$

 

$

20.0

 

$

1.3

 

$

 

Long-term and subordinated debt

 

358.2

 

27.8

 

 

362.4

 

29.2

 

 

Total fair value contracts

 

$

368.2

 

$

28.3

 

$

 

$

382.4

 

$

30.5

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps - cash flow:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Dollar LIBOR based loans

 

$

50.0

 

$

0.3

 

$

 

$

200.0

 

$

9.2

 

$

 

Prime based loans

 

50.0

 

0.6

 

 

125.0

 

3.4

 

 

Total cash flow contracts

 

$

100.0

 

$

0.9

 

$

 

$

325.0

 

$

12.6

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments

 

$

468.2

 

$

29.2

 

$

 

$

707.4

 

$

43.1

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Swaps

 

$

979.2

 

$

29.0

 

$

29.6

 

$

822.6

 

$

11.0

 

$

10.3

 

Interest-rate caps, floors and collars

 

179.3

 

0.4

 

0.4

 

133.2

 

0.4

 

0.4

 

Options purchased

 

2.0

 

0.1

 

0.1

 

2.0

 

0.1

 

0.1

 

Options written

 

2.0

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

Total interest-rate contracts

 

$

1,162.5

 

$

29.5

 

$

30.1

 

$

959.8

 

$

11.5

 

$

10.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity index futures

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

1.7

 

$

0.1

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spot and forward contracts

 

$

237.9

 

$

6.0

 

$

5.7

 

$

222.4

 

$

3.6

 

$

3.3

 

Options purchased

 

71.9

 

0.1

 

0.1

 

10.3

 

0.3

 

0.3

 

Options written

 

71.9

 

1.5

 

1.5

 

10.3

 

 

 

Total foreign exchange contracts

 

$

381.7

 

$

7.6

 

$

7.3

 

$

243.0

 

$

3.9

 

$

3.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

 

$

1,544.2

 

$

37.1

 

$

37.4

 

$

1,204.5

 

$

15.5

 

$

14.4

 

 


(1)         Derivative assets include the estimated gain to settle a derivative contract plus net interest receivable.  Derivative liabilities include the estimated loss to settle a derivative contract.

 

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

 

As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $468.2 million notional amount of interest-rate swaps, of which $368.2 million were designated as fair value hedges and $100.0 million were designated as cash flow hedges. The positive fair value of the fair value hedges of $28.3 million resulted in the recognition of other assets and an increase in hedged deposits and borrowings of $26.6 million. The remaining $1.7 million of fair value represents net interest receivable.  The net positive fair value of cash flow hedges of variable-rate loans of $0.9 million resulted in other assets of $0.6 million and other comprehensive income of $0.3 million, after tax, as of June 30, 2010.  AOCI also includes a net deferred gain of $3.6 million related to cash flow hedges that were terminated prior to their maturity dates for which the hedged transactions have yet to occur.  The remaining $0.3 million of fair value represents net interest receivable.

 

32



Table of Contents

 

Note 11. Derivative Instruments (Continued)

 

As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $707.4 million notional amount of interest-rate swaps, of which $382.4 million were designated as fair value hedges and $325.0 million were designated as cash flow hedges. The positive fair value of the fair value hedges of $30.5 million resulted in the recognition of other assets and an increase in hedged deposits and borrowings of $28.9 million. The remaining $1.6 million of fair value represents net interest receivable. The positive fair value of cash flow hedges of variable-rate loans of $12.6 million resulted in other assets of $11.7 million and other comprehensive income of $6.8 million, after tax, as of June 30, 2009.  AOCI also included a net deferred gain of $0.2 million related to cash flow hedges that were terminated prior to their maturity dates for which the hedged transactions had yet to occur. The remaining $0.9 million of fair value represents net interest receivable.

 

The Company’s swap agreements require the deposit of cash or marketable debt securities as collateral based on certain risk thresholds. These requirements apply individually to the Corporation and to the Bank. Additionally, certain of the Company’s swap agreements contain credit-risk-related contingent features. Under these agreements, the collateral requirements are based on the Company’s credit rating from the major credit rating agencies. The amount of collateral required varies by counterparty based on a range of credit ratings that correspond with exposure thresholds established in the derivative agreements. If the credit rating on the Company’s debt were to fall below the level associated with a particular exposure threshold and the derivatives with a counterparty are in a net liability position that exceeds that threshold, the counterparty could request immediate payment or delivery of collateral for the difference between the net liability amount and the exposure threshold. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position on June 30, 2010 was $12.0 million. The Company was not required to deliver collateral because the net liability position did not exceed the exposure threshold amount at the Company’s current credit rating.

 

The Company’s interest-rate swaps had $6.0 million and $12.5 million of credit risk exposure at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The credit exposure represents the cost to replace, on a present value basis and at current market rates, all contracts by trading counterparty having an aggregate positive market value, net of margin collateral received. The Company enters into master netting agreements with swap counterparties to mitigate credit risk. Under these agreements, the net amount due from or payable to each counterparty is settled on the contract payment date.  Collateral valued at $14.1 million and $20.1 million had been received from swap counterparties at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.  Additionally, the Company had delivered collateral valued at $6.5 million to a counterparty at June 30, 2010.

 

The periodic net settlement of interest-rate swaps is recorded as an adjustment to interest income or interest expense.  The impact of interest-rate swaps on interest income and interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is provided below:

 

(in millions)
Derivative Instruments Designated

 

Location in Consolidated

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

as Hedging Instruments

 

Statements of Income

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Interest-rate swaps-fair value

 

Interest expense

 

$

(4.3

)

$

(3.8

)

$

(8.7

)

$

(6.9

)

Interest-rate swaps-cash flow

 

Interest income

 

2.6

 

2.9

 

5.6

 

5.8

 

Total income

 

 

 

$

6.9

 

$

6.7

 

$

14.3

 

$

12.7

 

 

Fair value and cash flow interest-rate swaps increased net interest income by $6.9 million and $14.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and increased net interest income by $6.7 million and $12.7 million for the same periods in 2009.

 

Changes in fair value of the effective portion of cash flow hedges are reported in AOCI. When the cash flows associated with the hedged item are realized, the gain or loss included in AOCI is recognized in Interest income on loans and leases, the same location in the consolidated statements of income as the income on the hedged item. The amount of gains on cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $2.6 million and $5.6 million, respectively, and $2.9 million and $5.8 million for the same periods in 2009.  Within the next 12 months, $0.6 million of other comprehensive income is expected to be reclassified into interest income. Any ineffective portion of the changes of fair value of cash flow hedges is recognized immediately in Other noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income.

 

33



Table of Contents

 

Note 11.  Derivative Instruments (Continued)

 

The amount of after-tax loss on the change in fair value of cash flow hedges recognized in AOCI was $4.0 million (net of taxes of $2.9 million) for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with an after-tax gain of $0.1 million (net of taxes of $0.1 million) for the same period of 2009.

 

The amount of hedge ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges was nominal at June 30, 2010.

 

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

 

Derivative contracts not designated as hedges are marked-to-market each reporting period with changes in fair value recorded as a part of Noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income.  The table below provides the amount of gains and losses on these derivative contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

 

(in millions)
Derivatives Not Designated as

 

Location in Consolidated

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

Hedging Instruments

 

Statements of Income

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Interest-rate contracts

 

Other noninterest income

 

$

(0.8

)

$

1.0

 

$

(0.9

)

$

1.3

 

Equity index futures

 

Other noninterest income

 

 

(0.4

)

(0.1

)

(0.1

)

Foreign exchange contracts

 

International services income

 

5.8

 

4.9

 

10.5

 

8.8

 

Total income

 

 

 

$

5.0

 

$

5.5

 

$

9.5

 

$

10.0

 

 

Note 12. Income Taxes

 

The Company recognized an income tax benefit of $2.9 million and $1.0 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and income tax expense of $1.6 million and $0.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  The income tax benefit for the second quarter of 2010 includes a $19 million tax litigation settlement with the California Franchise Tax Board, offset by expense of $4.3 million relating to revisions to certain deferred tax accounts.  In May 2010, the Company and the California Franchise Tax Board closed its audits for the years 1998 through 2004 and settled litigation related to various refund claims and other pending matters under review.  Under the terms of the settlement, the Company received $29 million in tax credits, which added approximately $19 million to the Company’s net income in the second quarter of 2010.  In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded an adjustment to correct certain deferred tax accounts related to revisions of book and tax basis differences established in previous years related to its wealth management affiliates, low income housing investments and fixed assets.  The net effect of the adjustment was a reduction of the deferred tax asset and a corresponding tax expense of $4.3 million.

 

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions as an income tax provision expense. The Company recognized approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million of interest and penalties expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company had approximately $2.1 million, $5.5 million and $6.7 million of accrued interest and penalties as of June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.

 

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return and also file income tax returns in various state jurisdictions.  The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) completed its audits of the Company for the tax year 2008 resulting in no material financial statement impact. The Company is currently being audited by the IRS for 2009. The potential financial statement impact, if any, resulting from completion of these audits is expected to be minimal.

 

From time to time, there may be differences in opinion with respect to the tax treatment accorded transactions. If a tax position which was previously recognized on the consolidated financial statements is no longer “more likely than not” to be sustained upon a challenge from the taxing authorities, the tax benefit from the tax position will be derecognized. As of June 30, 2010, the Company does not have any tax positions which dropped below a “more likely than not” threshold.

 

34



Table of Contents

 

Note 13. Retirement Plans

 

The Company has a profit-sharing retirement plan with an Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k) feature covering eligible employees. Employer contributions are made annually into a trust fund and are allocated to participants based on their salaries. The profit sharing contribution requirement is based on a percentage of annual operating income subject to a percentage of salary cap. Eligible employees may contribute up to 50 percent of their salary to the 401(k) plan, but not more than the maximum allowed under Internal Revenue Service regulations. The Company matches 50 percent of the first 6 percent of covered compensation. The Company recorded total profit sharing and matching contribution expense of $2.3 million and $4.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 respectively. Profit sharing and matching contribution expense was $1.3 million and $2.0 million for the same periods in 2009, respectively.

 

The Company has a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for one of its executive officers.  The SERP meets the definition of a pension plan under ASC Topic 960, Plan Accounting — Defined Benefit Pension Plans.  At June 30, 2010, there was a $5.1 million unfunded pension liability related to the SERP.  Pension expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.   Pension expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

 

There is also a SERP covering three former executives of the Pacific Bank, which the Company acquired in 2000.  As of June 30, 2010, there was an unfunded pension liability for this SERP of $2.3 million.  Expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was insignificant. Expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $0.1 million.

 

The Company does not provide any other post-retirement employee benefits beyond the profit-sharing retirement plan and the SERPs.

 

Note 14. Contingencies

 

In connection with the liquidation of an investment acquired in a previous bank merger, the Company has an outstanding long-term indemnity.  The maximum liability under the indemnity is $23 million, but the Company does not expect to make any payments under the terms of this indemnity.

 

Note 15. Variable Interest Entities

 

The Company holds ownership interests in certain special-purpose entities formed to provide affordable housing. The Company evaluates its interest in these entities to determine whether they meet the definition of a VIE and whether the Company is required to consolidate these entities. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of the affordable housing VIEs in which it holds interests and is therefore not required to consolidate these entities. The investment in these entities is initially recorded at cost, which approximates the maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Company’s involvement with these unconsolidated entities. Subsequently, the carrying value is amortized over the stream of available tax credits and benefits. The Company expects to recover its investments over time, primarily through realization of federal low-income housing tax credits.  The balance of the investments in these entities was $102.0 million, $93.4 million and $96.4 million at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and is included in Affordable housing investments in the consolidated balance sheets. Unfunded commitments for affordable housing investments were $22.2 million at June 30, 2010. These unfunded commitments are recorded in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

Of the affordable housing investments held as of June 30, 2010, the Company had a significant variable interest in four affordable housing partnerships. These interests were acquired at various times from 1998 to 2001. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with these entities is limited to the $7.4 million aggregate carrying value of these investments at June 30, 2010. There were no unfunded commitments for these affordable housing investments at June 30, 2010.

 

35



Table of Contents

 

Note 15. Variable Interest Entities (Continued)

 

The Company also has ownership interests in several private equity investment funds that are VIEs. The Company is not a primary beneficiary and, therefore, is not required to consolidate these VIEs. The investment in these entities is carried at cost, which approximates the maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Company’s involvement with these entities. The Company expects to recover its investments over time, primarily through the allocation of fund income, gains or losses on the sale of fund assets, dividends or interest income. The balance in these entities was $37.5 million, $37.4 million and $38.7 million at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and is included in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Income associated with these investments is reported in Other noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income.

 

Note 16.  Noncontrolling Interest

 

In accordance with ASC 810 and EITF Topic D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities (“Topic D-98”), the Company reports noncontrolling interest in its majority-owned affiliates as either a separate component of equity in Noncontrolling interest in the consolidated balance sheets or as Redeemable noncontrolling interest in the “mezzanine” section between liabilities and equity in the consolidated financial statements. Topic D-98 specifies that securities that are redeemable at the option of the holder or outside the control of the issuer are not considered permanent equity and should be classified in the “mezzanine” section.

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest

 

The Corporation holds a majority ownership interest in seven investment management and wealth advisory affiliates that it consolidates and a noncontrolling interest in two other firms.  In general, the management of each majority-owned affiliate has a significant noncontrolling ownership position in their firm and supervises the day-to-day operations of the affiliate. The Corporation is in regular contact with each affiliate regarding their operations and is an active participant in the management of the affiliates through its position on each firm’s board.

 

The Corporation’s investment in each affiliate is governed by operating agreements and other arrangements which provide the Corporation certain rights, benefits and obligations. The Corporation determines the appropriate method of accounting based upon these agreements and the factors contained therein. All majority-owned affiliates that have met the criteria for consolidation are included in the consolidated financial statements. All material intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated. The Corporation applies the equity method of accounting to investments where it holds a noncontrolling interest.  For equity method investments, the Corporation’s portion of income before taxes is included in Trust and investment fees in the consolidated statements of income.

 

As of June 30, 2010, affiliate noncontrolling owners held equity interests with an estimated fair value of $47.6 million.  This estimate reflects the maximum obligation to purchase equity interests in the affiliates.  The events which would require the Company to purchase the equity interests may occur in the near term or over a longer period of time.  The terms of the put provisions vary by agreement, but the value of the put is intended to equal or approximate the fair market value of the interests. The parent company carries key man life insurance policies to fund a portion of these conditional purchase obligations in the event of the death of an interest holder.

 

The following is a reconciliation of redeemable noncontrolling interest for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

 

 

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

51,381

 

$

44,811

 

Net income (loss)

 

1,230

 

(1,057

)

Distributions to noncontrolling interest

 

(1,266

)

(1,465

)

Additions and redemptions, net

 

(4,771

)

(5,252

)

Adjustments to fair value

 

1,048

 

(285

)

Balance, end of period

 

$

47,622

 

$

36,752

 

 

36



Table of Contents

 

Note 17. Segment Results

 

The Company has three reportable segments: Commercial and Private Banking, Wealth Management and Other. The factors considered in determining whether individual operating segments could be aggregated include that the operating segments: (i) offer the same products and services, (ii) offer services to the same types of clients, (iii) provide services in the same manner and (iv) operate in the same regulatory environment. The management accounting process measures the performance of the operating segments based on the Company’s management structure and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial services companies. If the management structures and/or the allocation process changes, allocations, transfers and assignments may change.

 

The Commercial and Private Banking reportable segment is the aggregation of the Commercial and Private Banking, Real Estate, Entertainment, Corporate Banking and Core Branch Banking operating segments.  The Commercial and Private Banking segment provides banking products and services, including commercial and mortgage loans, lines of credit, deposits, cash management services, international trade finance and letters of credit to small and medium-sized businesses, entrepreneurs and affluent individuals.  This segment primarily serves clients in California, New York and Nevada.

 

The Wealth Management segment includes the Corporation’s investment advisory affiliates and the Bank’s Wealth Management Services. The asset management affiliates and the Wealth Management division of the Bank make the following investment advisory and wealth management resources and expertise available to individual and institutional clients: investment management, wealth advisory services, brokerage, estate and financial planning and personal, business, custodial and employee trust services. The Wealth Management segment also advises and makes available mutual funds under the name of CNI Charter Funds. Both the asset management affiliates and the Bank’s Wealth Management division provide proprietary and nonproprietary products to offer a full spectrum of investment solutions in all asset classes and investment styles, including fixed-income instruments, mutual funds, domestic and international equities and alternative investments such as hedge funds.

 

The Other segment includes all other subsidiaries of the Company, the corporate departments, including the Treasury Department and the Asset Liability Funding Center, that have not been allocated to the other segments, and inter-segment eliminations for revenue recognized in multiple segments for management reporting purposes. The Company uses traditional matched-maturity funds transfer pricing methodology.  However, both positive and negative variances occur over time when transfer pricing non-maturing balance sheet items such as demand deposits.  These variances, offset in the Funding Center, are evaluated annually by management and allocated back to the business segments as deemed necessary.

 

Business segment earnings are the primary measure of the segment’s performance as evaluated by management.  Business segment earnings include direct revenue and expenses of the segment as well as corporate and inter-company cost allocations. Allocations of corporate expenses, such as data processing and human resources, are calculated based on estimated activity levels for the fiscal year. Costs associated with intercompany support and services groups, such as Operational Services, are allocated to each business segment based on actual services used.  Capital is allocated based on the estimated risk within each business segment. The methodology of allocating capital is based on each business segment’s credit, market, and operational risk profile. If applicable, any provision for credit losses is allocated based on various credit factors, including but not limited to, credit risk ratings, credit rating fluctuation, charge-offs and recoveries and loan growth. Income taxes are charged to the business segments at the statutory rate. The Other segment includes an adjustment to reconcile to the Company’s overall effective tax rate.

 

Exposure to market risk is managed in the Company’s Treasury department. Interest rate risk is mostly removed from the Commercial and Private Banking segment and transferred to the Funding Center through a fund transfer pricing (“FTP”) methodology and allocating model. The FTP model records a cost of funds or credit for funds using a combination of matched maturity funding for fixed term assets and liabilities and a blended rate for the remaining assets and liabilities with varying maturities.

 

The Bank’s investment portfolio and unallocated equity are included in the Other segment. Amortization expense associated with customer-relationship intangibles is charged to the affected operating segments.

 

37



Table of Contents

 

Note 17. Segment Results (Continued)

 

Selected financial information for each segment is presented in the following tables. Commercial and Private Banking includes all revenue and costs from products and services utilized by clients of Commercial and Private Banking, including both revenue and costs for Wealth Management products and services. The revenues and costs associated with Wealth Management products and services that are allocated to Commercial and Private Banking for management reporting purposes are eliminated in the Other segment.  At year-end 2009, the methodology for allocating income taxes to the reportable segments was revised.  Prior period segment results have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2010

 

 

 

Commercial and

 

Wealth

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

(in thousands)

 

Private Banking

 

Management

 

Other

 

Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings Summary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

172,521

 

$

372

 

$

9,105

 

$

181,998

 

Provision for credit losses on loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

32,000

 

 

 

32,000

 

Provision for losses on covered loans

 

46,516

 

 

 

46,516

 

Noninterest income

 

99,046

 

40,178

 

(16,697

)

122,527

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

3,393

 

1,538

 

3,560

 

8,491

 

Noninterest expense

 

156,089

 

36,665

 

(14,667

)

178,087

 

Income before income taxes

 

33,569

 

2,347

 

3,515

 

39,431

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

14,099

 

802

 

(17,760

)

(2,859

)

Net income

 

19,470

 

1,545

 

21,275

 

42,290

 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

437

 

535

 

972

 

Net income attributable to City National Corporation

 

$

19,470

 

$

1,108

 

$

20,740

 

$

41,318

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Average Balances:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

$

11,515,926

 

$

 

$

65,994

 

$

11,581,920

 

Covered loans

 

2,002,893

 

 

 

2,002,893

 

Total assets

 

14,174,269

 

555,816

 

6,069,102

 

20,799,187

 

Deposits

 

16,963,504

 

48,171

 

588,623

 

17,600,298

 

Goodwill

 

318,340

 

161,642

 

 

479,982

 

Customer-relationship intangibles, net

 

11,407

 

30,922

 

 

42,329

 

 

38



Table of Contents

 

Note 17. Segment Results (Continued)

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2009

 

 

 

Commercial and

 

Wealth

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

(in thousands)

 

Private Banking

 

Management

 

Other

 

Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings Summary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

154,384

 

$

798

 

$

394

 

$

155,576

 

Provision for credit losses

 

70,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

Noninterest income

 

39,818

 

32,501

 

(8,062

)

64,257

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

3,079

 

1,400

 

3,142

 

7,621

 

Noninterest expense

 

116,909

 

32,269

 

(12,665

)

136,513

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

4,214

 

(370

)

1,855

 

5,699

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

1,770

 

110

 

(2,866

)

(986

)

Net income (loss)

 

2,444

 

(480

)

4,721

 

6,685

 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

(630

)

542

 

(88

)

Net income attributable to City National Corporation

 

$

2,444

 

$

150

 

$

4,179

 

$

6,773

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Average Balances:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases

 

$

12,295,358

 

$

 

$

58,902

 

$

12,354,260

 

Total assets

 

12,441,336

 

571,729

 

4,356,246

 

17,369,311

 

Deposits

 

12,711,298

 

72,929

 

1,239,048

 

14,023,275

 

Goodwill

 

317,801

 

141,617

 

 

459,418

 

Customer-relationship intangibles, net

 

9,763

 

28,306

 

 

38,069

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2010

 

 

 

Commercial and

 

Wealth

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

(in thousands)

 

Private Banking

 

Management

 

Other

 

Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings Summary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

341,145

 

$

705

 

$

15,653

 

$

357,503

 

Provision for credit losses on loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

87,000

 

 

 

87,000

 

Provision for losses on covered loans

 

46,516

 

 

 

46,516

 

Noninterest income

 

144,306

 

80,251

 

(25,157

)

199,400

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

6,694

 

3,507

 

7,084

 

17,285

 

Noninterest expense

 

301,446

 

71,923

 

(28,142

)

345,227

 

Income before income taxes

 

43,795

 

5,526

 

11,554

 

60,875

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

18,394

 

1,804

 

(18,639

)

1,559

 

Net income

 

25,401

 

3,722

 

30,193

 

59,316

 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

1,230

 

1,070

 

2,300

 

Net income attributable to City National Corporation

 

$

25,401

 

$

2,492

 

$

29,123

 

$

57,016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Average Balances:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

$

11,698,338

 

$

 

$

63,784

 

$

11,762,122

 

Covered loans

 

1,918,481

 

 

 

1,918,481

 

Total assets

 

14,317,251

 

500,428

 

5,717,008

 

20,534,687

 

Deposits

 

16,604,189

 

47,771

 

582,300

 

17,234,260

 

Goodwill

 

318,340

 

161,642

 

 

479,982

 

Customer-relationship intangibles, net

 

12,041

 

31,544

 

 

43,585

 

 

39



Table of Contents

 

Note 17. Segment Results (Continued)

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2009

 

 

 

Commercial and

 

Wealth

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

(in thousands)

 

Private Banking

 

Management

 

Other

 

Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings Summary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

303,230

 

$

1,244

 

$

(4,001

)

$

300,473

 

Provision for credit losses

 

120,000

 

 

 

120,000

 

Noninterest income

 

81,883

 

68,757

 

(39,088

)

111,552

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

6,501

 

2,614

 

6,341

 

15,456

 

Noninterest expense

 

223,216

 

65,028

 

(26,581

)

261,663

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

35,396

 

2,359

 

(22,849

)

14,906

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

14,866

 

1,435

 

(15,655

)

646

 

Net income (loss)

 

20,530

 

924

 

(7,194

)

14,260

 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

(1,056

)

1,083

 

27

 

Net income (loss) attributable to City National Corporation

 

$

20,530

 

$

1,980

 

$

(8,277

)

$

14,233

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Average Balances:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases

 

$

12,313,450

 

$

 

$

61,264

 

$

12,374,714

 

Total assets

 

12,464,990

 

584,280

 

3,843,652

 

16,892,922

 

Deposits

 

12,115,519

 

74,213

 

1,245,726

 

13,435,458

 

Goodwill

 

317,801

 

141,651

 

 

459,452

 

Customer-relationship intangibles, net

 

10,265

 

28,636

 

 

38,901

 

 

40



Table of Contents

 

CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

 

 

 

 

 

Percent change

 

 

 

At or for the three months ended

 

 June 30, 2010 from

 

 

 

June 30,

 

March 31,

 

June 30,

 

 March 31, 

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts) (1)

 

2010

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

(Unaudited)

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

For The Quarter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income atrributable to City National Corporation

 

$

41,318

 

$

15,698

 

$

6,773

 

163

%

510

%

Net income available to common shareholders

 

41,318

 

9,996

 

1,272

 

313

 

3,148

 

Net income per common share, basic

 

0.78

 

0.19

 

0.02

 

311

 

3,800

 

Net income per common share, diluted

 

0.78

 

0.19

 

0.02

 

311

 

3,800

 

Dividends per common share

 

0.10

 

0.10

 

0.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At Quarter End

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

$

21,231,447

 

$

20,066,475

 

$

17,660,785

 

6

 

20

 

Securities

 

4,890,430

 

3,996,886

 

3,468,463

 

22

 

41

 

Loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

11,483,044

 

11,689,536

 

12,421,342

 

(2

)

(8

)

Covered loans (2)

 

2,034,591

 

1,803,048

 

 

13

 

NM

 

Deposits

 

17,972,913

 

16,963,729

 

14,498,251

 

6

 

24

 

Common shareholders’ equity

 

1,901,771

 

1,838,222

 

1,757,438

 

3

 

8

 

Total equity

 

1,926,960

 

1,863,411

 

2,173,916

 

3

 

(11

)

Book value per common share

 

36.51

 

35.43

 

34.14

 

3

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Balances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

$

20,799,187

 

$

20,267,248

 

$

17,369,311

 

3

 

20

 

Securities

 

4,243,756

 

4,036,435

 

3,364,194

 

5

 

26

 

Loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

11,581,920

 

11,944,326

 

12,354,260

 

(3

)

(6

)

Covered loans (2)

 

2,002,893

 

1,833,131

 

 

9

 

NM

 

Deposits

 

17,600,298

 

16,864,155

 

14,023,275

 

4

 

26

 

Common shareholders’ equity

 

1,856,446

 

1,843,808

 

1,729,584

 

1

 

7

 

Total equity

 

1,881,635

 

2,003,150

 

2,145,859

 

(6

)

(12

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Ratios

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average assets (annualized)

 

0.80

%

0.31

%

0.16

%

158

 

400

 

Return on average common shareholders’ equity (annualized)

 

8.93

 

2.20

 

0.29

 

306

 

2,979

 

Corporation’s tier 1 leverage

 

7.96

 

8.03

 

10.16

 

(1

)

(22

)

Corporation’s tier 1 risk-based capital

 

11.69

 

11.44

 

12.35

 

2

 

(5

)

Corporation’s total risk-based capital

 

14.68

 

14.42

 

14.18

 

2

 

4

 

Period-end common shareholders’ equity to period-end assets

 

8.96

 

9.16

 

9.95

 

(2

)

(10

)

Period-end total equity to period-end assets

 

9.08

 

9.29

 

12.31

 

(2

)

(26

)

Dividend payout ratio, per common share

 

12.71

 

52.16

 

383.66

 

(76

)

(97

)

Net interest margin

 

3.93

 

3.97

 

3.98

 

(1

)

(1

)

Expense to revenue ratio (3)

 

55.29

 

62.24

 

63.80

 

(11

)

(13

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset Quality Ratios (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans to total loans and leases

 

2.27

%

2.82

%

3.05

%

(20

)

(26

)

Nonaccrual loans and OREO to total loans and leases and OREO

 

2.73

 

3.30

 

3.19

 

(17

)

(14

)

Allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans and leases

 

2.53

 

2.50

 

2.06

 

1

 

23

 

Allowance for loan and lease losses to nonaccrual loans

 

111.68

 

88.72

 

67.68

 

26

 

65

 

Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)

 

(1.16

)

(1.68

)

(1.84

)

(31

)

(37

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At Quarter End

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets under management (5)

 

$

34,172,272

 

$

35,783,366

 

$

30,286,415

 

(5

)

13

 

Assets under management or administration (5)

 

54,613,807

 

55,844,305

 

47,838,854

 

(2

)

14

 

 


(1)          Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

(2)          Covered loans represent acquired loans that are covered under a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC.

(3)          The expense to revenue ratio is defined as noninterest expense excluding other real estate owned (“OREO”) expense divided by total revenue (net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income).

(4)          Excludes covered assets, which consists of acquired loans and OREO that are covered under a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC.

(5)          Excludes $12.88 billion, $12.70 billion and $7.48 billion of assets under management for the asset manager in which the Company holds a noncontrolling ownership interest as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, and June 30, 2009, respectively. Also excludes $1.94 billion and $2.09 billion of assets under management and administration as of June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively, for an asset manager that the Company deconsolidated effective November 1, 2009.

 

41



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2.         MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

See “Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the ‘Safe Harbor’ Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,” on page 75 in connection with “forward-looking” statements included in this report.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition. The Company has identified eleven policies as being critical because they require management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, contingent assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses included in the consolidated financial statements.  The judgments and assumptions used by management are based on historical experience and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Circumstances and events that differ significantly from those underlying the Company’s estimates, assumptions and judgments could cause the actual amounts reported to differ significantly from these estimates.

 

The Company’s critical accounting policies include those that address accounting for business combinations, noncontrolling interest, financial assets and liabilities reported at fair value, securities, acquired impaired loans, allowance for loan and lease losses and reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments, other real estate owned (“OREO”), goodwill and other intangible assets, share-based compensation plans, income taxes and derivatives and hedging activities. The Company has not made any significant changes in its critical accounting policies or its estimates and assumptions from those disclosed in its 2009 Annual Report.

 

Several new accounting pronouncements became effective for the Company on January 1, 2010.  See Note 1 of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for a summary of the pronouncements and discussion of the impact of their adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

References to net income and earnings per share in the discussion that follows are based on net income attributable to the Company after deducting net income attributable to noncontrolling interest.

 

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

 

On April 8, 2010, the Company repurchased its outstanding common stock warrant issued to the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) during the Company’s participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The common stock warrant was originally issued in November 2008.  The repurchase price of $18.5 million was recorded as a charge to additional paid-in capital.

 

On May 7, 2010, the Bank acquired the banking operations of 1st Pacific Bank of California (“FPB”) in a purchase and assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Excluding the effects of acquisition accounting adjustments, the Bank acquired approximately $318.6 million in assets and assumed $264.2 million in liabilities.  The Bank acquired most of FPB’s assets, including loans with a fair value of $202.8 million, and assumed deposits with a fair value of $237.2 million.  The acquired loans and OREO are subject to a loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC.

 

On May 28, 2010, the Bank acquired the banking operations of Sun West Bank (“SWB”) in Nevada in a purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC.  Excluding the effects of acquisition accounting adjustments, the Bank acquired approximately $340.0 million in assets and assumed $310.1 million in liabilities.  The Bank acquired most of SWB’s assets, including loans with a fair value of $127.6 million, and assumed deposits with a fair value of $304.3 million. The acquired loans and OREO are subject to a loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC.

 

42



Table of Contents

 

Effective July 1, 2010, the Company will be ending its participation in the FDIC’s Transaction Account Guarantee program. Under this FDIC program, all non-interest bearing transaction accounts and certain interest-bearing checking accounts where the interest rate cannot exceed 0.50 percent are fully guaranteed by the FDIC for the full amount in the account. Coverage under this program is in addition to and separate from the coverage available under the FDIC’s general deposit insurance rules.  Effective July 1, 2010, the standard FDIC deposit insurance coverage became applicable again to all of the Company’s depositors.

 

HIGHLIGHTS

 

·       For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, consolidated net income attributable to City National Corporation and consolidated net income available to common shareholders was $41.3 million, or $0.78 per diluted common share. For the year-earlier quarter, consolidated net income attributable to City National Corporation was $6.8 million and consolidated net income available to common shareholders was $1.3 million, or $0.02 per diluted common share. The increase in net income available to common shareholders is primarily due to higher net interest income resulting from the Company’s acquisition of Imperial Capital Bank (“ICB”) in December 2009 and acquisitions of FPB and SWB in May 2010, as well as a $25.2 million gain on acquisitions recognized in the second quarter of 2010.  Net income available to common shareholders in the second quarter of 2010 also includes net tax benefits of $14.7 million, which are primarily related to a favorable tax litigation settlement.  See the “Income Taxes” section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.

 

·       Revenue, which consists of net interest income and noninterest income, was $304.5 million for the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 39 percent from $219.8 million in the year-earlier quarter.  Revenue was up 21 percent from the first quarter of 2010.

 

·       Fully taxable-equivalent net interest and dividend income increased to $185.3 million for the second quarter of 2010, up 17 percent from the same period last year and 4 percent from the first quarter of 2010.

 

·       The Company’s net interest margin was 3.93 percent for the second quarter of 2010, down from 3.97 percent for the first quarter of 2010 and 3.98 percent from the same quarter of 2009 due largely to strong growth in deposits, which were invested in lower-yielding assets.

 

·       Noninterest income was $122.5 million for the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 91 percent from $64.3 million for the year-earlier quarter, due largely to gains recognized on the acquisition of FPB and SWB in the second quarter of 2010.  It also included $28.3 million of income from the Company’s loss sharing agreement with the FDIC for its acquisitions of ICB, FPB and SWB.

 

·       In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a non-cash net impairment charge of $24.4 million for FDIC-covered loans acquired from ICB.

 

·       Second quarter noninterest expense was $186.6 million, up 29 percent from the second quarter of 2009 and 6 percent from the year-earlier quarter.  The increase was due largely to the acquisitions of ICB, FPB and SWB.  It also reflects increased compensation expense, legal and professional fees, and OREO expense.

 

·       The Company recognized a tax benefit of $2.9 million compared to a tax provision of $4.4 million in the first quarter of 2010.  The tax benefit for the second quarter of 2010 was primarily attributable to a favorable tax litigation settlement with the California Franchise Tax Board and revisions to certain deferred tax accounts.

 

·       Total assets were $21.23 billion at June 30, 2010, up 1 percent from $21.08 billion at December 31, 2009, and up 20 percent from $17.66 billion at June 30, 2009. The increase from the year-ago period largely reflected the Company’s strong deposit growth as well as its acquisitions of ICB, FPB and SWB. Total average assets increased to $20.80 billion for the second quarter of 2010 from $20.27 billion for the first quarter of 2010 and $17.37 billion for the second quarter of 2009.

 

43



Table of Contents

 

·       Loans and leases, excluding loans covered by the Company’s loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC, total $11.48 billion, a decrease of 5 percent from December 31, 2009 and 8 percent from June 30, 2009.  Average loans for the second quarter of 2010, on the same basis, were $11.58 billion, down 3 percent from the first quarter of 2010 and 6 percent from the year-earlier quarter.  The declines reflected low loan demand due to current business and economic conditions.

 

·       The allowance for loan and lease losses on non-FDIC-covered loans was $290.5 million at June 30, 2010, compared with $292.8 million at March 31, 2010 and $256.0 million at June 30, 2009. The Company’s allowance equals 2.53 percent of total loans and leases, excluding covered loans, at June 30, 2010, compared with 2.50 percent at March 31, 2010 and 2.06 percent at June 30, 2009.

 

·       The Company recognized a provision for credit losses on loans and leases, excluding covered loans, of $32.0 million for the second quarter of 2010, 42 percent lower than the $55.0 million in the first quarter of 2010 and 54 percent lower than the $70.0 million in the year-ago period.  Net loan charge-offs were $33.5 million, or 1.16 percent of average total loans and leases, excluding covered loans, on an annualized basis, for the second quarter of 2010, down from $49.5 million, or 1.68 percent, for the first quarter of 2010, and $56.7 million, or 1.84 percent, in the year-earlier quarter.

 

·       Nonaccrual loans totaled $260.1 million at June 30, 2010, down from $330.0 million at March 31, 2010 and $378.3 million at June 30, 2009. At June 30, 2010, nonperforming assets, excluding covered assets, were $314.6 million, compared with $388.0 million at March 31, 2010, and $396.3 million at June 30, 2009.

 

·       Average securities for the second quarter of 2010 totaled $4.24 billion, an increase of 5 percent from $4.04 billion for the first quarter of 2010 and an increase of 26 percent from $3.36 billion for the second quarter of 2009, as increased deposits and capital were invested in high-grade, fixed-income instruments.

 

·       Period end deposits at June 30, 2010 were $17.97 billion, up 6 percent from $16.96 billion at March 31, 2010 and 24 percent from $14.50 billion at June 30, 2009.  Average deposit balances for the second quarter of 2010 grew to $17.60 billion, up 4 percent from $16.86 billion for the first quarter of 2010 and up 26 percent from $14.02 billion for the second quarter of 2009.  Average core deposits grew 29 percent from the second quarter of 2009, and now amount to approximately 93 percent of total average deposit balances.  Increases in deposits from prior periods are primarily attributable to the deposits assumed in the acquisitions of ICB, FPB and SWB.

 

·       The Company’s ratio of total capital to risk-based assets at June 30, 2010 improved to 14.7 percent, from 14.2 percent at June 30, 2009, and 14.4 percent at March 31, 2010.  The Company’s ratio of Tier 1 common shareholders’ equity to risk-based assets was 9.7 percent at June 30, 2010 compared with 9.3 percent at June 30, 2009 and 9.4 percent at March 31, 2010. Refer to the “Capital” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis for further discussion of this non-GAAP measure.

 

OUTLOOK

 

Management expects significantly increased profitability in 2010 over 2009.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Net Interest Income

 

 Net interest income is the difference between interest income (which includes yield-related loan fees) and interest expense. Net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis expressed as a percentage of average total earning assets is referred to as the net interest margin, which represents the average net effective yield on earning assets.  The following tables present the components of net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

 

44



Table of Contents

 

Net Interest Income Summary

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30, 2010

 

For the three months ended
June 30, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

Average

 

 

 

Interest

 

Average

 

 

 

Average

 

income/

 

interest

 

Average

 

income/

 

interest

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance

 

expense (1)(4)

 

rate

 

Balance

 

expense (1)(4)

 

rate

 

Assets (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

$

4,339,027

 

$

48,716

 

4.50

%

$

4,720,874

 

$

49,562

 

4.21

%

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

2,098,471

 

29,241

 

5.59

 

2,177,735

 

30,889

 

5.69

 

Residential mortgages

 

3,541,794

 

47,477

 

5.36

 

3,454,042

 

47,555

 

5.51

 

Real estate construction

 

690,576

 

6,733

 

3.91

 

1,153,336

 

8,744

 

3.04

 

Equity lines of credit

 

743,220

 

6,631

 

3.58

 

674,091

 

5,809

 

3.46

 

Installment

 

168,832

 

2,171

 

5.16

 

174,182

 

2,191

 

5.05

 

Total loans and leases, excluding covered loans (3)

 

11,581,920

 

140,969

 

4.88

 

12,354,260

 

144,750

 

4.70

 

Covered loans

 

2,002,893

 

34,540

 

6.90

 

 

 

0.00

 

Total loans and leases

 

13,584,813

 

175,509

 

5.18

 

12,354,260

 

144,750

 

4.70

 

Due from banks - interest-bearing

 

701,175

 

424

 

0.24

 

195,141

 

291

 

0.60

 

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements

 

213,220

 

135

 

0.25

 

14,925

 

9

 

0.23

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

4,189,723

 

34,311

 

3.28

 

3,251,772

 

33,138

 

4.08

 

Trading securities

 

54,033

 

24

 

0.18

 

112,422

 

380

 

1.36

 

Other interest-earning assets

 

147,925

 

663

 

1.80

 

74,781

 

644

 

3.45

 

Total interest-earning assets

 

18,890,889

 

211,066

 

4.48

 

16,003,301

 

179,212

 

4.49

 

Allowance for loan and lease losses

 

(308,468

)

 

 

 

 

(245,639

)

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

240,871

 

 

 

 

 

323,944

 

 

 

 

 

Other non-earning assets

 

1,975,895

 

 

 

 

 

1,287,705

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

20,799,187

 

 

 

 

 

$

17,369,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing deposits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest checking accounts

 

$

2,385,831

 

$

1,413

 

0.24

 

$

1,388,417

 

$

1,008

 

0.29

 

Money market accounts

 

5,364,960

 

7,631

 

0.57

 

4,111,173

 

8,765

 

0.86

 

Savings deposits

 

300,720

 

338

 

0.45

 

221,564

 

409

 

0.74

 

Time deposits - under $100,000

 

413,636

 

859

 

0.83

 

220,489

 

783

 

1.42

 

Time deposits - $100,000 and over

 

1,146,787

 

2,343

 

0.82

 

1,311,472

 

5,103

 

1.56

 

Total interest-bearing deposits

 

9,611,934

 

12,584

 

0.53

 

7,253,115

 

16,068

 

0.89

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

182,936

 

1,704

 

3.74

 

472,246

 

2,084

 

1.77

 

Other borrowings

 

803,793

 

11,517

 

5.75

 

493,429

 

2,148

 

1.75

 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

10,598,663

 

25,805

 

0.98

 

8,218,790

 

20,300

 

0.99

 

Noninterest-bearing deposits

 

7,988,364

 

 

 

 

 

6,770,160

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

330,525

 

 

 

 

 

234,502

 

 

 

 

 

Total equity

 

1,881,635

 

 

 

 

 

2,145,859

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

20,799,187

 

 

 

 

 

$

17,369,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest spread

 

 

 

 

 

3.50

%

 

 

 

 

3.50

%

Fully taxable-equivalent net interest and dividend income

 

 

 

$

185,261

 

 

 

 

 

$

158,912

 

 

 

Net interest margin

 

 

 

 

 

3.93

%

 

 

 

 

3.98

%

Less: Dividend income included in other income

 

 

 

663

 

 

 

 

 

644

 

 

 

Fully taxable-equivalent net interest income

 

 

 

$

184,598

 

 

 

 

 

$

158,268

 

 

 

 


(1)   Net interest income is presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis.

(2)   Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

(3)   Includes average nonaccrual loans of $292,422 and $353,445 for 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(4)   Loan income includes loan fees of $5,555 and $3,916 for 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

45



Table of Contents

 

Net Interest Income Summary

 

 

 

For the six months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30, 2010

 

June 30, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

Average

 

 

 

Interest

 

Average

 

 

 

Average

 

income/

 

interest

 

Average

 

income/

 

interest

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance

 

expense (1)(4)

 

rate

 

Balance

 

expense (1)(4)

 

rate

 

Assets (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

$

4,448,517

 

$

97,359

 

4.41

%

$

4,738,282

 

$

99,020

 

4.21

%

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

2,124,539

 

58,358

 

5.54

 

2,188,903

 

62,027

 

5.71

 

Residential mortgages

 

3,532,018

 

94,973

 

5.38

 

3,430,351

 

95,115

 

5.55

 

Real estate construction

 

748,735

 

14,105

 

3.80

 

1,192,291

 

18,465

 

3.12

 

Equity lines of credit

 

738,989

 

13,074

 

3.57

 

652,093

 

11,080

 

3.43

 

Installment

 

169,324

 

4,324

 

5.15

 

172,794

 

4,354

 

5.08

 

Total loans and leases, excluding covered loans (3)

 

11,762,122

 

282,193

 

4.84

 

12,374,714

 

290,061

 

4.73

 

Covered loans

 

1,918,481

 

64,046

 

6.68

 

 

 

0.00

 

Total loans and leases

 

13,680,603

 

346,239

 

5.10

 

12,374,714

 

290,061

 

4.73

 

Due from banks - interest-bearing

 

489,140

 

770

 

0.32

 

164,875

 

446

 

0.54

 

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements

 

129,902

 

157

 

0.24

 

12,997

 

15

 

0.23

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

4,082,539

 

68,001

 

3.33

 

2,779,547

 

59,924

 

4.31

 

Trading securities

 

58,129

 

(28

)

(0.09

)

113,740

 

435

 

0.77

 

Other interest-earning assets

 

147,337

 

1,299

 

1.78

 

74,890

 

1,287

 

3.46

 

Total interest-earning assets

 

18,587,650

 

416,438

 

4.52

 

15,520,763

 

352,168

 

4.58

 

Allowance for loan and lease losses

 

(301,618

)

 

 

 

 

(240,708

)

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

269,736

 

 

 

 

 

329,390

 

 

 

 

 

Other non-earning assets

 

1,978,919

 

 

 

 

 

1,283,477

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

20,534,687

 

 

 

 

 

$

16,892,922

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing deposits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest checking accounts

 

$

2,311,040

 

$

2,733

 

0.24

 

$

1,244,049

 

$

1,875

 

0.30

 

Money market accounts

 

5,110,475

 

15,075

 

0.59

 

4,004,548

 

18,477

 

0.93

 

Savings deposits

 

343,486

 

967

 

0.57

 

193,723

 

674

 

0.70

 

Time deposits - under $100,000

 

484,464

 

1,711

 

0.71

 

227,416

 

2,066

 

1.83

 

Time deposits - $100,000 and over

 

1,192,543

 

5,262

 

0.89

 

1,386,995

 

12,537

 

1.82

 

Total interest-bearing deposits

 

9,442,008

 

25,748

 

0.55

 

7,056,731

 

35,629

 

1.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

241,249

 

3,639

 

3.04

 

596,959

 

4,263

 

1.44

 

Other borrowings

 

807,779

 

22,979

 

5.74

 

509,666

 

5,002

 

1.98

 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

10,491,036

 

52,366

 

1.01

 

8,163,356

 

44,894

 

1.11

 

Noninterest-bearing deposits

 

7,792,252

 

 

 

 

 

6,378,726

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

309,342

 

 

 

 

 

252,446

 

 

 

 

 

Total equity

 

1,942,057

 

 

 

 

 

2,098,394

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

20,534,687

 

 

 

 

 

$

16,892,922

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest spread

 

 

 

 

 

3.51

%

 

 

 

 

3.47

%

Fully taxable-equivalent net interest and dividend income

 

 

 

$

364,072

 

 

 

 

 

$

307,274

 

 

 

Net interest margin

 

 

 

 

 

3.95

%

 

 

 

 

3.99

%

Less: Dividend income included in other income

 

 

 

1,299

 

 

 

 

 

1,287

 

 

 

Fully taxable-equivalent net interest income

 

 

 

$

362,773

 

 

 

 

 

$

305,987

 

 

 

 


(1)   Net interest income is presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis.

(2)   Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

(3)   Includes average nonaccrual loans of $328,806 and $318,096 for 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(4)   Loan income includes loan fees of $10,429 and $8,467 for 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

46



Table of Contents

 

Net interest income is impacted by the volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), interest rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume), and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.  The following tables provide a breakdown of the changes in net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis and dividend income due to volume and rate between the second quarter and first six months of 2010 and 2009, as well as the second quarter and first six months of 2009 and 2008.  The impact of interest rate swaps, which affect interest income on loans and leases and interest expense on deposits and borrowings, is included in rate changes.

 

Changes In Net Interest Income

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30,

 

For the three months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2010 vs 2009

 

2009 vs 2008

 

 

 

Increase (decrease)

 

Net

 

Increase (decrease)

 

Net

 

 

 

due to

 

increase

 

due to

 

increase

 

(in thousands)

 

Volume

 

Rate

 

(decrease)

 

Volume

 

Rate

 

(decrease)

 

Interest earned on:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans and leases (1)

 

$

15,187

 

$

15,572

 

$

30,759

 

$

4,056

 

$

(26,447

)

$

(22,391

)

Securities available-for-sale

 

8,417

 

(7,244

)

1,173

 

9,701

 

(5,301

)

4,400

 

Due from banks - interest-bearing

 

392

 

(259

)

133

 

318

 

(555

)

(237

)

Trading securities

 

(133

)

(223

)

(356

)

42

 

(78

)

(36

)

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements

 

125

 

1

 

126

 

23

 

(72

)

(49

)

Other interest-earning assets

 

426

 

(407

)

19

 

(47

)

(333

)

(380

)

Total interest-earning assets

 

24,414

 

7,440

 

31,854

 

14,093

 

(32,786

)

(18,693

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid on:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest checking deposits

 

606

 

(201

)

405

 

643

 

(1,146

)

(503

)

Money market deposits

 

2,278

 

(3,412

)

(1,134

)

1,444

 

(8,509

)

(7,065

)

Savings deposits

 

119

 

(190

)

(71

)

92

 

225

 

317

 

Time deposits

 

107

 

(2,791

)

(2,684

)

1,188

 

(5,160

)

(3,972

)

Other borrowings

 

94

 

8,895

 

8,989

 

(7,735

)

(4,281

)

(12,016

)

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

3,204

 

2,301

 

5,505

 

(4,368

)

(18,871

)

(23,239

)

 

 

$

21,210

 

$

5,139

 

$

26,349

 

$

18,461

 

$

(13,915

)

$

4,546

 

 


(1) Includes covered loans.

 

47



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30,

 

For the six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2010 vs 2009

 

2009 vs 2008

 

 

 

Increase (decrease)

 

Net

 

Increase (decrease)

 

Net

 

 

 

due to

 

increase

 

due to

 

increase

 

(in thousands)

 

Volume

 

Rate

 

(decrease)

 

Volume

 

Rate

 

(decrease)

 

Interest earned on:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans and leases (1)

 

$

32,254

 

$

23,924

 

$

56,178

 

$

13,848

 

$

(71,188

)

$

(57,340

)

Securities available-for-sale

 

23,634

 

(15,557

)

8,077

 

8,600

 

(6,813

)

1,787

 

Due from banks - interest-bearing

 

567

 

(243

)

324

 

552

 

(1,157

)

(605

)

Trading securities

 

(141

)

(322

)

(463

)

217

 

(804

)

(587

)

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements

 

141

 

1

 

142

 

43

 

(150

)

(107

)

Other interest-earning assets

 

839

 

(827

)

12

 

(8

)

(755

)

(763

)

Total interest-earning assets

 

57,294

 

6,976

 

64,270

 

23,252

 

(80,867

)

(57,615

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid on:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest checking deposits

 

1,299

 

(441

)

858

 

1,039

 

(2,088

)

(1,049

)

Money market deposits

 

4,348

 

(7,750

)

(3,402

)

3,128

 

(22,664

)

(19,536

)

Savings deposits

 

438

 

(145

)

293

 

127

 

333

 

460

 

Time deposits

 

542

 

(8,172

)

(7,630

)

2,577

 

(12,944

)

(10,367

)

Other borrowings

 

(507

)

17,860

 

17,353

 

(14,792

)

(12,948

)

(27,740

)

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

6,120

 

1,352

 

7,472

 

(7,921

)

(50,311

)

(58,232

)

 

 

$

51,174

 

$

5,624

 

$

56,798

 

$

31,173

 

$

(30,556

)

$

617

 


(1) Includes covered loans.

 

Net interest income increased to $182.0 million for the second quarter of 2010 from $155.6 million for the second quarter of 2009 and $175.5 million for the first quarter of 2010.  The increase in net interest income was due primarily to strong growth in deposits which were invested in securities and the loans acquired in the acquisition of ICB in December 2009 and FPB and SWB in May 2010.  Interest income on loans increased from $143.7 million for the second quarter of 2009 to $174.4 million for the second quarter of 2010.

 

Total interest expense was $25.8 million and $20.3 million for the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Interest expense on deposits was $12.6 million for the second quarter of 2010 compared with $16.1 million for the year-earlier quarter, a 22 percent decrease. The decrease was a result of declining interest rates, partially offset by a 33 percent increase in average interest-bearing deposit balances from the second quarter of 2009 to the second quarter of 2010.  Interest expense on borrowings increased to $13.2 million for the second quarter of 2010 from $4.2 million for the same period in 2009. The increase was due to an increase in borrowings resulting from the issuance of $180 million of subordinated debt in the third quarter of 2009 and $250 million of trust preferred securities in December 2009.

 

The net settlement of interest-rate swaps increased interest income by $6.9 million for the second quarter of 2010, and increased interest income by $6.7 million for the year-earlier quarter.

 

Fully taxable-equivalent net interest income, which includes amounts to convert nontaxable income to fully taxable-equivalent amounts, increased to $184.6 million for the second quarter of 2010 from $158.3 million for the second quarter of 2009 and $178.2 million for the first quarter of 2010.  The $26.3 million increase in fully taxable equivalent net interest income from the year ago quarter was primarily generated through loan and securities growth (volume variance) and was partially offset by a decrease in net interest income due to declining rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities (rate variance).  The yield on earning assets was 4.48 percent for the second quarter of 2010, down from 4.49 percent for the year-earlier quarter and 4.56 percent for the first quarter of 2010. The Company’s average prime rate for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 was 3.25 percent, unchanged from both March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 0.98 percent for the second quarter of 2010, down from 0.99 percent for the same period of 2009 and 1.04

 

48



Table of Contents

 

percent for the first quarter of 2010.  Lower funding costs and growth in noninterest-bearing deposits reduced the impact of the 8 basis point decrease in the yield on earning assets compared with the first quarter of 2010.

 

The fully taxable net interest margin was 3.93 percent for the second quarter of 2010, down from 3.98 percent for the year-earlier quarter and 3.97 percent for the first quarter of 2010.  The decreases were largely due to strong growth in deposits, which were invested into lower-yielding assets.

 

Average loans and leases, excluding covered loans, decreased to $11.58 billion for the second quarter of 2010, a decrease of 6 percent from average loans and leases of $12.35 billion for the second quarter of 2009 and a decrease of 3 percent from $11.94 billion for the first quarter of 2010.  The declines reflect low loan demand due to challenging business and economic conditions.  Average commercial loans were down 8 percent from the same period last year and 5 percent from the first quarter of 2010. Average commercial real estate mortgages decreased by 4 percent from the prior year quarter and 2 percent from the first quarter of 2010. Average residential mortgage loans, nearly all of which are made to the Company’s private banking clients, increased 3 percent from the same quarter in 2009 and virtually unchanged from the first quarter of this year. Average construction loans decreased 40 percent and 14 percent from the prior year quarter and first quarter of 2010, respectively.  Average covered loans grew to $2.00 billion for the second quarter of 2010 from $1.83 billion in the first quarter of 2010 due to the acquisitions of FPB and SWB in May 2010.

 

Average total securities for the second quarter of 2010 were $4.24 billion, a 26 percent increase from the second quarter of 2009 and a 5 percent increase from the first quarter of 2010.  The increase in average securities from prior periods is due to strong deposit growth.

 

Average deposits totaled $17.60 billion for the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 26 percent from average deposits of $14.02 billion for the second quarter of 2009 and 4 percent from $16.86 billion for the first quarter of 2010.  Average core deposits, which continued to provide substantial benefits to the Bank’s cost of funds, increased 29 percent to $16.45 billion for the second quarter of 2010 from $12.71 billion for the second quarter of 2009 and increased 5 percent from $15.63 billion for the first quarter of 2010. Average core deposits, which do not include certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more, represented 93 percent of the total average deposits for the second quarter of 2010.

 

Provision for Credit Losses

 

The Company accounts for the credit risk associated with lending activities through its allowance for loan and lease losses, reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments and provision for credit losses.  The provision for credit losses is the expense recognized in the consolidated statements of income to adjust the allowance and the reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments to the levels deemed appropriate by management, as determined through application of the Company’s allowance methodology procedures.  See “Critical Accounting Policies” on page 40 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

The Company recorded expense of $32.0 million and $70.0 million through the provision for credit losses on loans and leases, excluding covered loans, in the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  The provision reflects management’s continuing assessment of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, which is affected by a broad range of economic factors.  Additional factors affecting the provision include net loan charge-offs, nonaccrual loans, specific reserves, risk rating migration and changes in the portfolio size and composition.  See “Balance Sheet Analysis—Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Reserve for Off-Balance Sheet Credit Commitments” for further information on factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for loan and lease losses.

 

Nonaccrual loans totaled $260.1 million at June 30, 2010, down from $330.0 million at March 31, 2010 and $378.3 million at June 30, 2009.  The decrease in nonaccrual loans relates primarily to the real estate construction and commercial loan portfolios.  Commercial real estate mortgages on nonaccrual increased to $57.2 million as of June 30, 2010, from $36.1 million as of June 30, 2009, but decreased from $66.2 million as of March 31, 2010.  Total nonperforming assets, excluding covered assets, were $314.6 million, or 2.73 percent of total loans and leases and OREO, excluding covered assets, at June 30, 2010.  This compares with $388.0 million, or 3.30 percent, at March 31, 2010 and $396.3 million, or 3.19 percent, at June 30, 2009.

 

49



Table of Contents

 

Net loan charge-offs were $33.5 million, or 1.16 percent of average total loans and leases, excluding covered loans, on an annualized basis, for the second quarter of 2010, down from $56.7 million, or 1.84 percent, in the year-earlier quarter and $49.5 million, or 1.68 percent in the first quarter of 2010. The decrease in net charge-offs from the second quarter of 2009 occurred primarily in the Company’s real estate construction portfolio.

 

Covered loans represent loans acquired from the FDIC that are subject to a loss sharing agreement, and are accounted for as acquired impaired loans under ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (“ASC 310-30”).  Loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are generally considered accruing and performing loans as the loans accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are reasonably estimable. Accordingly, acquired impaired loans that are contractually past due are still considered to be accruing and performing loans.  If the timing and amount of future cash flows is not reasonably estimable, the loans may be classified as nonaccrual loans and interest income is not recognized until the timing and amount of future cash flows can be reasonably estimated. At June 30, 2010, there were no acquired impaired loans on nonaccrual status.

 

In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a $46.5 million provision for loans losses on its covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30.  The provision expense is primarily a result of a decrease in projected interest cash flows due to the Company’s revised default forecasts, though the principal credit loss projections are expected to be in line with initial expectations.  The second-quarter revisions of the default forecasts are based on the results of management’s review of the credit quality of the covered loans and the analysis of the loan performance data since the acquisition of the covered loans.  The Company will continue updating cash flow projections on the covered loans on a quarterly basis.  As of June 30, 2010, the allowance for loan losses for covered loans was $46.3 million.  The allowance is included in Covered loans on the consolidated balance sheets.

 

The Company has not originated nor purchased subprime or option adjustable-rate mortgages.

 

Credit quality will be influenced by underlying trends in the economic cycle, particularly in California and Nevada, and other factors which are beyond management’s control. Consequently, no assurances can be given that the Company will not sustain loan or lease losses, in any particular period, that are sizable in relation to the allowance for loan and lease losses.

 

Noninterest Income

 

Noninterest income was $122.5 million in the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 91 percent from the second quarter of 2009 and 59 percent from the first quarter of 2010, due largely to gains of $25.2 million on the acquisitions of FPB and SWB, as well as $28.3 million of loss-sharing income for acquired assets covered by the FDIC recognized in the second quarter of 2010. Noninterest income accounted for 40 percent of the Company’s revenue in the current quarter, an increase from 29 percent for the year-earlier quarter and 30 percent for the first quarter of 2010.

 

Wealth Management

 

The Company provides various trust, investment and wealth advisory services to its individual and business clients. The Company delivers these services through the Bank’s wealth management division as well as through its wealth management affiliates. Trust services are provided only by the Bank. Trust and investment fee revenue includes fees from trust, investment and asset management, and other wealth advisory services. A portion of these fees is based on the market value of client assets managed, advised, administered or held in custody. The remaining portion of these fees is based on the specific service provided, such as estate and financial planning services, or may be fixed fees. For those fees based on market valuations, the mix of assets held in client accounts, as well as the type of managed account, impacts how closely changes in trust and investment fee income correlate with changes in the financial markets. Changes in market valuations are reflected in fee income primarily on a trailing-quarter basis. Trust and investment fees of $34.0 million for the second quarter of 2010 were up 35 percent from the second quarter of 2009 as market conditions improved since the prior year, and increased slightly by 1 percent from the first quarter of 2010.  Money market mutual fund and brokerage fees were $5.5 million, down 18 percent from $6.6 million for the year-earlier quarter, but up 4 percent from $5.3 million for the first quarter of 2010.  The decline in money market mutual fund and brokerage fees from the prior year was due to lower balances, historically low rates on government and other quality short-term bonds, and reduced spreads and trading activity.

 

50



Table of Contents

 

Assets under management (“AUM”) include assets for which the Company makes investment decisions on behalf of its clients and assets under advisement for which the Company receives advisory fees from its clients. Assets under administration (“AUA”) are assets the Company holds in a fiduciary capacity or for which it provides non-advisory services.  The table below provides a summary of AUM and AUA for the dates indicated:

 

 

 

At June 30,

 

%

 

At March 31,

 

%

 

(in millions)

 

2010

 

2009

 

Change

 

2010

 

Change

 

Assets Under Management

 

$

34,172

 

$

30,286

 

13

 

$

35,783

 

(5

)

Assets Under Administration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brokerage

 

5,179

 

5,281

 

(2

)

5,005

 

3

 

Custody and other fiduciary

 

15,263

 

12,272

 

24

 

15,056

 

1

 

Subtotal

 

20,442

 

17,553

 

16

 

20,061

 

2

 

Total assets under management or administration (1) (2)

 

$

54,614

 

$

47,839

 

14

 

$

55,844

 

(2

)

 


(1)

 

Excludes $12.88 billion, $12.70 billion and $7.48 billion of assets under management for an asset manager in which the Company held a noncontrolling ownership interest as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.

 

 

 

(2)

 

Excludes $1.94 billion and $2.09 billion of assets under management or administration as of June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively, for an asset manager that the Company deconsolidated effective November 1, 2009.

 

AUM increased 13 percent from the year-earlier quarter and decreased 5 percent from the first quarter of 2010.  Assets under management or administration increased 14 percent from the year-earlier quarter and decreased 2 percent from the first quarter of 2010. The increase in AUM compared with the year-earlier quarter was primarily due to higher equity market values, higher assets under management at Convergent Wealth Advisors and the July 2009 acquisition of Lee Munder Capital Group (“LMCG”), which added $3.36 billion of AUM at the date of acquisition.  These increases were partially offset by a reduction in AUM resulting from the deconsolidation of a wealth management affiliate during the fourth quarter of 2009.

 

A distribution of AUM by type of investment is provided in the following table:

 

Investment (1)

 

% of AUM
June 30,
2010

 

% of AUM
March 31,
2010

 

% of AUM
June 30,
2009

 

Equities

 

33

%

33

%

25

%

U.S. fixed income

 

27

 

27

 

27

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

21

 

21

 

30

 

Other (2)

 

19

 

19

 

18

 

 

 

100

%

100

%

100

%

 


(1)

Excludes assets under management for an asset manager in which the Company held a noncontrolling interest as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009. Also excludes assets under management for an asset manager that the Company deconsolidated effective November 1, 2009.

(2)

Includes international equities, private equity and other alternative investments.

 

The mix of assets for the second quarter of 2010 changed from the prior year quarter due to an increase in equity investments as a result of the LMCG acquisition and increases in the market value of equities. Additionally, the decrease in cash and cash equivalents from the prior year quarter occurred as clients shifted funds to high yielding assets and insured bank deposit accounts.

 

Other Noninterest Income

 

Cash management and deposit transaction fees for the second quarter of 2010 were $12.0 million, down 6 percent from the second quarter of 2009 and 5 percent from the first quarter of 2010.  The decline in deposit-related fee income from the year-earlier quarter was due to lower client transaction volumes.

 

51



Table of Contents

 

International services income for the second quarter of 2010 was $8.4 million, an increase of 5 percent from the year-earlier quarter and 29 percent from the first quarter of 2010.  International services income includes foreign exchange fees, fees on commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit, foreign collection fees and gains and losses associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.  The increase from the first quarter was due primarily to increased demand for foreign exchange services from the Company’s entertainment clients.

 

Income and expense from FDIC loss sharing agreements is reflected in FDIC loss sharing income, net.  This balance includes the portion of expenses related to covered assets that are reimbursable by the FDIC, net of income due to the FDIC.  It also includes discount accretion on the FDIC indemnification asset, as well as the income statement effects of other adjustments to the FDIC indemnification asset. Net FDIC loss sharing income was $28.3 million for the second quarter of 2010, up from $9.1 million for the first quarter of 2010.  The increase from the first quarter of 2010 was primarily due to $22.1 million of income recognized on the FDIC indemnification asset as a result of a revision of the Company’s projected cash flows forecast on its covered loans.

 

Other income for the second quarter of 2010 was $11.4 million, an increase of 27 percent from the second quarter of 2009 and 71 percent from the first quarter of 2010.  The changes were due largely to an increase in income from the transfer of covered loans to OREO.

 

The Company recognized $0.4 million of net gains on the sale of securities available-for-sale in the second quarter of 2010, compared with net gains of $3.3 million and net gains of $2.1 million for the second quarter of 2009 and first quarter of 2010, respectively.

 

Impairment losses on securities available-for-sale recognized in earnings were $0.5 million for the second quarter of 2010, compared with $1.5 million for the second quarter of 2009 and $1.0 million for the first quarter of 2010.  See “Balance Sheet Analysis — Securities” for a discussion of impairment on securities available-for-sale.

 

The Company recognized a $25.2 million pre-tax gain on the FDIC-assisted acquisition of FPB and SWB in May 2010.

 

Net loss on the disposal of assets was $2.8 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared to net gain on disposal of other assets of $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2010.  The gain recognized on the disposal of assets in the second quarter of 2009 was insignificant.  The net loss in the second quarter of 2010 relates mostly to a $5.0 million charge for the write-off of a Community Reinvestment Act-related receivable offset by gains recognized on the sale of OREO.

 

Noninterest Expense

 

Noninterest expense was $186.6 million for the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 29 percent from $144.1 million for the second quarter of 2009.  The increase from the year-earlier period was due largely to the acquisitions of LMCG and ICB in 2009 and FPB and SWB in May 2010.  It also reflected increased compensation expense and legal and professional fees, as well as increased OREO expense.  Noninterest expense increased 6 percent from the first quarter of 2010 due primarily to higher personnel costs, professional fees, and the acquisitions of FPB and SWB.

 

Salaries and employee benefits expense increased to $99.6 million for the current quarter, or 31 percent, from $75.8 million for the year-earlier quarter and 4 percent, from $95.7 million for the first quarter of 2010. The increase in expense for the year-earlier quarter was primarily due to increased personnel costs from the addition of employees from the Company’s acquisitions in 2009 and 2010, as well as an increase in incentive compensation expense.  Full-time equivalent staff increased to 3,117 at June 30, 2010, from 2,866 at June 30, 2009 and 2,983 at March 31, 2010.

 

The remaining noninterest expense categories increased $18.7 million, or 27 percent, for the second quarter of 2010 compared with the year-earlier quarter, due primarily to a $14.6 million increase in OREO expense and a $5.5 million increase in legal and professional fees.  Approximately $9.2 million of OREO expense in the second quarter of 2010 is related to acquisitions of ICB, FPB and SWB.  Approximately $7.3 million of this amount is reimbursable to the Company and reflected in FDIC loss-sharing income, net in the noninterest income section of the consolidated statements of income.  The remaining noninterest expense categories increased 8 percent from the first quarter of 2010 due primarily to higher legal and professional fees.

 

52



Table of Contents

 

Share-Based Compensation Expense

 

On June 30, 2010, the Company had one share-based compensation plan, the City National Corporation 2008 Omnibus Plan (the “Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s shareholders on April 23, 2008.  No new awards will be granted under predecessor plans. See Note 10, Share-Based Compensation, of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q for a description of the share-based compensation plan and method of estimating the fair value of option awards.

 

The compensation cost that has been recognized for all share-based awards was $4.2 million and $8.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, and $3.7 million and $7.2 million for the year-earlier periods, respectively. The Company received $17.8 million and $0.5 million in cash for the exercise of stock options during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  The tax benefit recognized for share-based compensation arrangements in equity was $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared with tax expense of $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

 

At June 30, 2010, there was $16.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under the Company’s plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.6 years. At June 30, 2010, there was $21.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted shares granted under the Company’s plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.2 years.

 

Segment Operations

 

The Company’s reportable segments are Commercial and Private Banking, Wealth Management and Other.  For a more complete description of the segments, including summary financial information, see Note 17 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.  At year-end 2009, the methodology for allocating income taxes to the reportable segments was revised. Prior period segment results have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

 

Commercial and Private Banking

 

The Commercial and Private Banking segment had net income of $19.5 million for the second quarter of 2010, compared with net income of $2.4 million for the second quarter of 2009. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $25.4 million compared to $20.5 million for the year-earlier period. The increase in net income for the quarter and year to date compared with the prior year periods was due primarily to FDIC loss sharing income and the gain on acquisitions of FPB and SWB, offset by increased expenses associated with the FDIC-assisted acquisitions and increased OREO expense.   Net interest income increased to $172.5 million for the second quarter of 2010 from $154.4 million for the same period of 2009.  Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $341.4 million compared to $303.2 million for the same period in 2009.  The increase in net interest income was largely due to covered loans acquired in FDIC-assisted acquisitions in December 2009 and May 2010.  Average loans, excluding covered loans, decreased to $11.52 billion, or by 6 percent, for the second quarter of 2010 compared with the year-earlier quarter.  Average loans, excluding covered loans, decreased to $11.70 billion, or by 5 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared with the year-earlier period. The decrease in average loans for the quarter and year to date reflects lower loan demand due to the current business and economic environment.  Average covered loans was $2.00 billion for the second quarter of 2010 and $1.92 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  Average deposits, including those acquired from acquisitions, increased by 33 percent to $16.96 billion in the second quarter of 2010 from $12.71 billion for the second quarter of 2009.  Average deposits increased by 37 percent to $16.60 billion during the six month period ended June 30, 2010 from $12.12 billion for the same period in 2009.

 

Provision for credit losses on loans and leases, excluding covered loans, decreased from $70.0 million in the second quarter of 2009 to $32.0 million in the second quarter of 2010, and from $120.0 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2009 to $87.0 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010.  The decrease in provision for credit losses from prior period to current period was offset by the recognition of $46.5 million of provision for losses on covered loans in the second quarter of 2010.  Refer to page 49 for further discussion of the provision for loan losses.

 

Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2010 was $99.0 million compared to $39.8 million in year-earlier quarter, and $144.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $81.9 million for the same period in 2009.  The increase was attributable to $25.2 million in acquisition gains recognized in the second quarter of 2010, and FDIC loss sharing income of $28.3 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $37.4 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Noninterest expense, including depreciation and amortization, increased to $159.5 million, or by 33 percent, for the second quarter of 2010 from $120.0 million for the year-earlier quarter. Noninterest expense, including depreciation and amortization, increased to $308.1 million, or by 34 percent, for the first six months of 2010 from $229.7 million for the year-earlier

 

53



Table of Contents

 

period. Noninterest expense for the quarter and year-to-date increased as a result of the acquisitions of ICB, FPB and SWB, as well as higher OREO expense, a portion of which is reimbursable by the FDIC.

 

Wealth Management

 

The Wealth Management segment had net income attributable to CNC of $1.1 million for the second quarter of 2010, up from $0.2 million for the second quarter of 2009.  Net income attributable to CNC for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased to $2.5 million from $2.0 million for the year-earlier period. Increases in fee income resulting from improving conditions in the financial markets were partially offset by increases in noninterest expense. Refer to Noninterest Income — Wealth Management for a discussion of the factors impacting fee income for the Wealth Management segment. Noninterest expense, including depreciation and amortization, increased by 13 percent to $38.2 million for the second quarter of 2010 from $33.7 million for the year-earlier quarter. Noninterest expense, including depreciation and amortization, increased by 12 percent to $75.4 million for the first six months of 2010 from $67.6 million for the year-earlier period. The increase in noninterest expense compared with the year-earlier periods is due to higher compensation costs and expenses related to LMCG, an institutional asset management firm that was acquired in July 2009.

 

Other

 

Net income attributable to CNC for the Other segment was $20.7 million for the second quarter of 2010, up from $4.2 million for the second quarter of 2009.  Net income attributable to CNC was $29.1 million for the first six months of 2010, compared with a net loss of $8.3 million for the year-earlier period.  Net interest income increased to $9.1 million for the second quarter of 2010 from net interest income of $0.4 million for the year-earlier quarter. Net interest income increased to $15.7 million for the first six months of 2010 from net interest expense of $4.0 million for the year-earlier period. Net interest income for the current quarter and year-to-date was favorably impacted by lower net funding costs in the Asset Liability Funding Center due to the low interest rate environment. Noninterest income for year-to-date 2010  included a $2.5 million net gain on sales of securities and a $1.5 million impairment loss on securities, compared with a $0.4 million net gain on sales of securities and a $13.6 million impairment loss on securities for the year-earlier period.  Additionally, noninterest income for the year-to-date reflected a significant reduction in the elimination of inter-segment revenues (recorded in the Other segment) compared with the year-earlier period.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company recognized a tax benefit of $2.9 million during the second quarter of 2010, compared to a tax benefit of $1.0 million in the year-earlier quarter.  The Company recognized tax expense of $4.4 million, or an effective tax rate of 20.6 percent in the first quarter of 2010.  The tax benefit in the second quarter of 2010 is primarily attributable to a $19 million tax litigation settlement with the California Franchise Tax Board, offset by expense of $4.3 million relating to revisions to correct certain deferred tax accounts.  The effective tax rate for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was 2.6 percent compared with 4.3 percent for the year-earlier period.  The effective tax rates differ from the applicable statutory federal and state tax rates due to various factors, including primarily the tax litigation settlement, tax benefits from investments in affordable housing partnerships and tax-exempt income on municipal bonds and bank-owned life insurance.

 

In May 2010, the Company and the California Franchise Tax Board closed its audits for the years 1998 through 2004 and settled litigation related to various refund claims and other pending matters under review.  Under the terms of the settlement, the Company received $29 million in tax credits, which added approximately $19 million to the Company’s net income in the second quarter of 2010.  In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded an adjustment to correct certain deferred tax accounts related to revisions of book and tax basis differences established in previous years related to its wealth management affiliates, low income housing investments and fixed assets.  The net effect of the adjustment was a reduction of the deferred tax asset and a corresponding tax expense of $4.3 million.

 

Excluding the $19 million tax credit and $4.3 million expense relating to revisions to correct certain deferred tax accounts, the effective tax rate was 30.1 percent and 26.8 percent for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2010.   Management believes that this non-GAAP financial measure enhances the comparability of the financial results with prior periods as well as to highlight the effects of the above items in the periods presented.  The Company believes that investors may find it useful to see these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze the Company’s effective tax rate without the impact of these items.

 

54



Table of Contents

 

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return and also file income tax returns in various state jurisdictions.  The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) completed its audits of the Company for the tax year 2008 resulting in no material financial statement impact. The Company is currently being audited by the IRS for 2009. The potential financial statement impact, if any, resulting from completion of these audits is expected to be minimal.

 

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions as an income tax provision expense. The Company recognized approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million of interest and penalties expense for the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company had approximately $2.1 million, $5.5 million and $6.7 million of accrued interest and penalties as of June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.

 

From time to time, there may be differences in opinion with respect to the tax treatment accorded transactions. If a tax position which was previously recognized on the consolidated financial statements is no longer “more likely than not” to be sustained upon a challenge from the taxing authorities, the tax benefit from the tax position will be derecognized. As of June 30, 2010, the Company does not have any tax positions which dropped below a “more likely than not” threshold.

 

BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

 

Total assets were $21.23 billion at June 30, 2010, an increase of 20 percent from $17.66 billion at June 30, 2009, and an increase of 1 percent from $21.08 billion at December 31, 2009.  Average assets for the second quarter of 2010 increased to $20.80 billion from $17.37 billion for the second quarter of 2009.  The increase in period-end and average assets from the prior periods reflects the Company’s strong deposit growth as well as its acquisitions of ICB, FPB and SWB.

 

Total average interest-earning assets for the second quarter of 2010 increased to $18.89 billion from $17.61 billion for the fourth quarter of 2009 and $16.00 billion for the second quarter of 2009.

 

Securities

 

The following is a summary of amortized cost and estimated fair value for the major categories of securities available- for-sale:

 

Securities Available-for-Sale

 

 

 

June 30, 2010

 

December 31, 2009

 

June 30, 2009

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

19,096

 

$

19,145

 

$

73,597

 

$

73,597

 

$

15,786

 

$

15,831

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

1,084,703

 

1,090,846

 

659,716

 

656,721

 

397,859

 

398,409

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

447,363

 

466,713

 

552,691

 

555,157

 

575,184

 

584,932

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

2,455,952

 

2,528,237

 

2,294,676

 

2,306,111

 

1,542,507

 

1,550,675

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

234,330

 

217,078

 

272,262

 

241,329

 

349,687

 

292,669

 

State and municipal

 

347,469

 

360,422

 

368,454

 

378,639

 

398,584

 

403,783

 

Other debt securities

 

71,048

 

67,147

 

82,163

 

76,506

 

76,252

 

64,968

 

Total debt securities

 

4,659,961

 

4,749,588

 

4,303,559

 

4,288,060

 

3,355,859

 

3,311,267

 

Equity securities and mutual funds

 

8,128

 

11,555

 

15,861

 

18,698

 

17,317

 

19,059

 

Total securities

 

$

4,668,089

 

$

4,761,143

 

$

4,319,420

 

$

4,306,758

 

$

3,373,176

 

$

3,330,326

 

 

The fair value of securities available-for-sale totaled $4.76 billion, $4.31 billion and $3.33 billion at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The increase in securities from June 30, 2009 to June 30, 2010 was primarily a result of strong deposit growth, improving market values and securities acquired from the FDIC-assisted acquisitions of SWB and FPB in May 2010 and ICB in December 2009.  In the second quarter of 2010, the increase in securities balance was partially offset by scheduled maturities of $514.1 million, paydowns of $393.1 million and securities sales of $429.5 million.

 

At June 30, 2010, the available-for-sale securities portfolio had a net unrealized gain of $93.1 million, comprised of $121.3 million of unrealized gains and $28.2 million of unrealized losses. At December 31, 2009, the available-for-sale securities portfolio had a net unrealized loss of $12.7 million, comprised of $46.0 million of unrealized gains and $58.6

 

55



Table of Contents

 

million of unrealized losses. At June 30, 2009, the available-for-sale securities portfolio had a net unrealized loss of $42.8 million, comprised of unrealized losses of $80.9 million, net of $38.1 million of unrealized gains.

 

The average duration of total securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2010 was 2.3 years, down from 3.0 years at June 30, 2009 and 2.9 years at December 31, 2009. Duration provides a measure of fair value sensitivity to changes in interest rates.  The average duration is within the investment guidelines set by the Company’s Asset/Liability Committee and the interest-rate risk guidelines set by the Board of Directors.

 

The following table provides the gross realized gains and losses on the sales of securities available-for-sale for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Gross realized gains

 

$

491

 

$

3,432

 

$

4,993

 

$

8,664

 

Gross realized losses

 

(136

)

(151

)

(2,504

)

(8,314

)

Net realized gains

 

$

355

 

$

3,281

 

$

2,489

 

$

350

 

 

For the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, interest income on available-for-sale securities is comprised of: (i) taxable interest income of $29.6 million and $27.6 million, respectively, (ii) nontaxable interest income of $3.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, and (iii) dividend income of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.  For the first six months of 2010 and 2009, interest income on available-for-sale securities is comprised of: (i) taxable interest income of $58.4 million and $48.7 million, respectively, (ii) nontaxable interest income of $6.2 million and $7.3 million, respectively, and (iii) dividend income of $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

 

The following table provides the expected remaining maturities of debt securities included in the securities portfolio at June 30, 2010, except for mortgage-backed securities which are allocated according to the average life of expected cash flows.  Average expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because mortgage debt issuers may have the right to repay obligations prior to contractual maturity.

 

Debt Securities Available-for-Sale

 

 

 

 

 

Over 1 year

 

Over 5 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One year or

 

through

 

through

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

less

 

5 years

 

10 years

 

Over 10 years

 

Total

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

14,072

 

$

5,073

 

$

 

$

 

$

19,145

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

870,162

 

220,684

 

 

 

1,090,846

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

335

 

155,355

 

282,765

 

28,258

 

466,713

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

228,130

 

1,848,610

 

438,514

 

12,983

 

2,528,237

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

21,903

 

133,846

 

61,329

 

 

217,078

 

State and municipal

 

32,978

 

155,900

 

121,138

 

50,406

 

360,422

 

Other

 

10,210

 

9,934

 

47,003

 

 

67,147

 

Total debt securities

 

$

1,177,790

 

$

2,529,402

 

$

950,749

 

$

91,647

 

$

4,749,588

 

Amortized cost

 

$

1,170,255

 

$

2,462,359

 

$

937,619

 

$

89,728

 

$

4,659,961

 

 

Impairment Assessment

 

The Company performs a quarterly assessment of the debt and equity securities in its investment portfolio that have an unrealized loss to determine whether the decline in the fair value of these securities below their cost is other-than-temporary.  Impairment is considered other-than-temporary when it becomes probable that an investor will be unable to recover the cost of an investment. The Company’s impairment assessment takes into consideration factors such as the extent to which the market value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer including events specific to the issuer or industry; defaults or deferrals of scheduled interest, principal or dividend payments; external credit ratings and recent downgrades; and whether the Company intends to sell the security and whether it is more likely than not it will be required to

 

56



Table of Contents

 

sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis.  If a decline in fair value is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value which then becomes the new cost basis.  The new cost basis is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value.

 

In accordance with ASC 320-35, Investments—Debt and Equity Securities—Subsequent Measurement, when there are credit losses associated with an impaired debt security and the Company does not have the intent to sell the security and it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, the Company will separate the amount of the impairment into the amount that is credit-related and the amount related to non-credit factors. The credit-related impairment is recognized in Net impairment loss recognized in earnings in the consolidated statements of income. The non-credit-related impairment is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”).

 

Securities Deemed to be Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired

 

Through the impairment assessment process, the Company determined that certain investments were other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010.  The Company recorded impairment losses in earnings on securities available-for-sale of $0.5 million and $1.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  Of the Company’s total other-than-temporary impairment losses, $13.5 million related to non-credit-related impairment and was recorded in AOCI.  The Company recorded impairment losses in earnings on securities available-for-sale of $1.5 million and $13.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

 

The following table provides total impairment losses recognized in earnings on other-than-temporarily impaired securities:

 

(in thousands)
Impairment Losses on

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired Securities

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Non-agency CMOs

 

$

212

 

$

1,537

 

$

1,215

 

$

1,537

 

Collateralized debt obligation income notes

 

 

 

 

9,282

 

Perpetual preferred stock

 

294

 

 

294

 

1,124

 

Mutual funds

 

 

 

 

1,630

 

Total

 

$

506

 

$

1,537

 

$

1,509

 

$

13,573

 

 

The following table provides a rollforward of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings for debt securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Credit-related other-than-temporary impairment that was recognized in earnings during the three and six months ending June 30, 2010 is reflected as an “Initial credit-related impairment” if the current period is the first time the security had a credit impairment. A credit related other-than-temporary impairment is reflected as a “Subsequent credit-related impairment” if the current period is not the first time the security had a credit impairment.

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

18,710

 

$

13,298

 

$

17,707

 

$

8,083

 

Subsequent credit-related impairment

 

186

 

 

1,189

 

5,215

 

Initial credit-related impairment

 

26

 

1,537

 

26

 

1,537

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

18,922

 

$

14,835

 

$

18,922

 

$

14,835

 

 

Non-Agency CMOs

 

During the second quarter of 2010, the Company identified certain non-agency collateralized mortgage obligation securities (“CMOs”) that were considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired because the present value of expected cash flows was less than cost. These CMOs have a fixed interest rate for an initial period after which they become variable-rate instruments with annual rate resets. For purposes of projecting future cash flows, the current fixed coupon was used through the reset date for each security. The prevailing LIBOR/Treasury forward curve as of the measurement date was used to project all future floating-rate cash flows based on the characteristics of each security.  Other factors considered in the

 

57



Table of Contents

 

projection of future cash flows include the current level of subordination from other CMO classes, anticipated prepayment rates, cumulative defaults and loss given default. The Company concluded that the shortfall in expected cash flows represented a credit loss and recognized impairment losses in earnings totaling $0.2 million on its investments in CMOs in the second quarter. The Company has recognized credit losses totaling $1.2 million on its investments in non-agency CMOs year-to-date. The remaining other-than-temporary impairment for these securities was recognized in AOCI. This non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment is attributed to external market conditions, primarily the lack of liquidity in these securities and increases in interest rates.

 

Perpetual Preferred Stock

 

The adjusted cost basis of the Company’s investment in perpetual preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae was $0.3 million at June 30, 2010.  During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a $0.3 million impairment loss to adjust the costs basis of its investment to fair value.  The Company previously recorded a $1.1 million impairment loss in 2009 and $21.9 million impairment loss in 2008 following the action taken by the Federal Housing Agency to place these government-sponsored agencies into conservatorship and eliminating the dividends on their preferred shares.

 

The following tables provide a summary of the gross unrealized losses and fair value of investment securities aggregated by investment category and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.  The tables include investments for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized in earnings, along with investments that had a non-credit-related impairment recognized in AOCI:

 

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

12 months or greater

 

Total

 

(in thousands)

 

Fair Value

 

Estimated
Unrealized
Loss

 

Fair Value

 

Estimated
Unrealized
Loss

 

Fair Value

 

Estimated
Unrealized
Loss

 

June 30, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

4,029

 

$

1

 

$

 

$

 

$

4,029

 

$

1

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

50,516

 

289

 

 

 

50,516

 

289

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

293,008

 

2,116

 

 

 

293,008

 

2,116

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

24,327

 

455

 

124,892

 

18,550

 

149,219

 

19,005

 

State and municipal

 

2,810

 

57

 

4,645

 

110

 

7,455

 

167

 

Other debt securities

 

4,585

 

31

 

16,933

 

6,593

 

21,518

 

6,624

 

Total securities

 

$

379,275

 

$

2,949

 

$

146,470

 

$

25,253

 

$

525,745

 

$

28,202

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury

 

$

59,995

 

$

2

 

$

 

$

 

$

59,995

 

$

2

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

437,548

 

3,646

 

 

 

437,548

 

3,646

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

285,328

 

4,055

 

 

 

285,328

 

4,055

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

634,732

 

12,206

 

 

 

634,732

 

12,206

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

35,192

 

428

 

180,699

 

30,809

 

215,891

 

31,237

 

State and municipal

 

18,187

 

340

 

4,500

 

390

 

22,687

 

730

 

Other debt securities

 

 

 

36,315

 

6,750

 

36,315

 

6,750

 

Total securities

 

$

1,470,982

 

$

20,677

 

$

221,514

 

$

37,949

 

$

1,692,496

 

$

58,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal agency - Debt

 

$

109,193

 

$

867

 

$

 

$

 

$

109,193

 

$

867

 

Federal agency - MBS

 

125,930

 

1,139

 

 

 

125,930

 

1,139

 

CMOs - Federal agency

 

585,654

 

8,544

 

 

 

585,654

 

8,544

 

CMOs - Non-agency

 

25,355

 

4,674

 

267,314

 

52,344

 

292,669

 

57,018

 

State and municipal

 

58,795

 

965

 

10,382

 

878

 

69,177

 

1,843

 

Other debt securities

 

4,368

 

154

 

53,977

 

11,365

 

58,345

 

11,519

 

Total securities

 

$

909,295

 

$

16,343

 

$

331,673

 

$

64,587

 

$

1,240,968

 

$

80,930

 

 

58


 


Table of Contents

 

At June 30, 2010, total securities available-for-sale had a fair value of $4.76 billion, which included $525.7 million of securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2010.  This balance consists of $473.4 million of temporarily impaired securities and $52.3 million of securities that had non-credit related impairment recognized in AOCI.  At June 30, 2010, the Company had 50 debt securities in an unrealized loss position.  The debt securities in an unrealized loss position include 1 U.S. Treasury note, 1 Federal agency debt securities, 16 Federal agency CMOs, 21 private label CMOs, 9 state and municipal securities and 2 other debt securities.

 

The largest component of the unrealized loss at June 30, 2010 was $19.0 million related to non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations. The Company monitors the performance of the mortgages underlying these bonds. Collateral performance generally improved in the second quarter, though there was some additional deterioration in select securities which gave rise to additional credit impairment charges. The Company only holds the most senior tranches of each issue which provides protection against defaults. The Company attributes the unrealized loss on CMOs held largely to the current absence of liquidity in this sector of the credit markets. Other than the $1.2 million year-to-date credit loss discussed in Non-Agency CMOs above, the Company expects to receive all contractual principal and interest payments due on its CMO debt securities.  Additionally, the Company does not intend to sell the securities, and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the securities before it recovers the cost basis of its investment. The mortgages in these asset pools are relatively large and have been made to borrowers with strong credit history and significant equity invested in their homes. They are well diversified geographically. Nonetheless, significant further weakening of economic fundamentals coupled with significant increases in unemployment and substantial deterioration in the value of high-end residential properties could extend distress to this borrower population. This could increase default rates and put additional pressure on property values. Should these conditions occur, the value of these securities could decline and trigger the recognition of further other-than-temporary impairment charges.

 

Other debt securities include the Company’s investments in highly rated corporate debt and collateralized bond obligations backed by trust preferred securities (“CDOs”) issued by a geographically diverse pool of small- and medium-sized financial institutions.  Liquidity pressures in 2008 and in 2009 caused a general decline in the value of corporate debt.  The CDOs held in securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2010 are the most senior tranches of each issue. The market for CDOs has been inactive since 2008, therefore, the fair values of these securities were determined using an internal pricing model that incorporates assumptions about discount rates in an illiquid market, projected cash flows and collateral performance. The CDOs had a $6.6 million gross unrealized loss at June 30, 2010 which the Company attributes to the illiquid credit markets. The CDOs have collateral that exceeds the outstanding debt by over 29 percent at June 30, 2010.  Security valuations reflect the current and prospective performance of the issuers whose debt is contained in these asset pools. The Company expects to receive all contractual principal and interest payments due on its CDOs. Additionally, the Company does not intend to sell the securities, and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the securities before it recovers the cost basis of its investment.

 

The Company does not consider the debt securities in the table above to be other than temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010.

 

At December 31, 2009, total securities available-for-sale had a fair value of $4.31 billion, which included $1.69 billion of securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2009.  This balance consisted of $1.65 billion of temporarily impaired securities and $43.5 million of securities that had non-credit related impairment recognized in AOCI.  At December 31, 2009, the Company had 155 debt securities in an unrealized loss position. The debt securities in an unrealized loss position included 1 U.S. Treasury bill, 15 Federal agency debt securities, 30 Federal agency MBS, 44 Federal agency CMOs, 29 private label CMOs, 32 state and municipal securities and 4 other debt securities.

 

At June 30, 2009, total securities available-for-sale had a fair value of $3.33 billion, which included $1.24 billion of securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2009.  This balance consisted of $1.20 billion of temporarily impaired securities and $40.4 million of securities that had non-credit related impairment recognized in AOCI.  At June 30, 2009, the Company had 181 debt securities in an unrealized loss position. The debt securities in an unrealized loss position included 5 Federal agency securities, 10 Federal agency MBS, 32 Federal agency CMOs, 33 private label CMOs, 91 state and municipal securities and 10 other debt securities.

 

59



Table of Contents

 

Loan and Lease Portfolio

 

A comparative period-end loan and lease table is presented below:

 

Loans and Leases

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2009

 

Commercial

 

$

3,935,544

 

$

4,335,052

 

$

4,375,161

 

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

2,078,003

 

2,161,451

 

2,162,294

 

Residential mortgages

 

3,577,894

 

3,533,453

 

3,511,598

 

Real estate construction

 

629,902

 

835,589

 

1,116,154

 

Equity lines of credit

 

742,071

 

734,182

 

691,226

 

Installment

 

169,070

 

172,566

 

175,315

 

Lease financing

 

350,560

 

374,615

 

389,594

 

Loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

11,483,044

 

12,146,908

 

12,421,342

 

Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses

 

(290,492

)

(288,493

)

(256,018

)

Loans and leases, excluding covered loans, net

 

11,192,552

 

11,858,415

 

12,165,324

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans

 

2,080,846

 

1,851,821

 

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses

 

(46,255

)

 

 

Covered loans, net

 

2,034,591

 

1,851,821

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans and leases

 

$

13,563,890

 

$

13,998,729

 

$

12,421,342

 

Total loans and leases, net

 

$

13,227,143

 

$

13,710,236

 

$

12,165,324

 

 

Total loans and leases were $13.56 billion, $14.00 billion and $12.42 billion at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.  Total loans, excluding covered loans, were $11.48 billion, $12.15 billion and $12.42 billion at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.  Covered loans represent loans acquired from the FDIC that are subject to loss sharing agreements. Total loans and leases at June 30, 2010 decreased 3 percent from December 31, 2009 and increased 9 percent from June 30, 2009. The decrease from December 31, 2009 was attributable to low loan demand due to current business and economic conditions.  The increase from the year-earlier period was due primarily to the purchase of loans in the FDIC-assisted acquisitions of ICB in December 2009 and FPB and SWB in May 2010.  Commercial loans, including lease financing, decreased by 9 percent from year-end 2009 and 10 percent from the year-earlier quarter. Commercial real estate mortgage loans decreased by 4 percent from year-end 2009 and the year-earlier quarter. Residential mortgages increased by 1 percent from year-end 2009 and 2 percent from the year-earlier quarter. Real estate construction loans declined by 25 percent and 44 percent for the same periods, respectively.  Equity lines of credit was virtually unchanged from December 31, 2009, but increased by 7 percent from June 30, 2009.

 

The Company’s lending activities are predominately in California, and to a lesser extent, New York and Nevada. Excluding covered loans, at June 30, 2010, California represented 88 percent of total loans outstanding and Nevada and New York represented 2 percent and 4 percent, respectively. The remaining 6 percent of total loans outstanding represented other states. Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of clients are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions.  Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of the loan portfolio and credit performance depends on the economic stability of Southern California. California has experienced significant declines in real estate values and adverse effects of the recession.  California’s unemployment rate at June 30, 2010 was approximately 12 percent. The Company’s loan portfolio has been affected by the economy, but the impact is lessened by the Company having most of its loans in large metropolitan California cities such as Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego and lesser in the outlying suburban communities that have seen higher declines in real estate values. Within the Company’s Commercial loan portfolio, the five California counties with the largest exposures are Los Angeles (57 percent), Orange (7 percent), San Diego (5 percent), Ventura (2 percent) and San Francisco (2 percent). Within the Commercial Real Estate Mortgage loan portfolio, the five California counties with the largest exposures are Los Angeles (38 percent), Orange (11 percent), San Diego (7 percent), Ventura (6 percent) and Riverside (5 percent).  For the

 

60



Table of Contents

 

Real Estate Construction loan portfolio, the concentration in California is predominately in Los Angeles (33 percent), San Diego (7 percent), Contra Costa (5 percent), San Bernardino (5 percent) and Santa Barbara (5 percent).

 

The economic decline has been more severe in Nevada. The Nevada economy is heavily dependent on travel, tourism and construction. During early 2008, financial conditions in these sectors began to deteriorate rapidly.  The decline in the economy has led to an increase in the Nevada unemployment rate to approximately 14 percent. The consensus outlook for 2010 is that the Nevada economy will remain challenged as residential foreclosures continue to mount and overall consumer spending, which correlates to travel and tourism spending, is expected to remain suppressed given nationwide higher unemployment and general uncertainty about the economy. The Company’s Nevada portfolio has been broadly affected with the most significant stress in the construction and land portfolios.  The Company has very few residential mortgage loans in Nevada.  The New York loan portfolio primarily relates to private banking clients in the Entertainment and Legal industries which continue to perform well.

 

Covered Loans

 

Covered loans represent loans acquired from the FDIC that are subject to loss sharing agreements and were $2.08 billion at June 30, 2010 and $1.85 billion as of December 31, 2009.  Covered loans, net of allowance for loan losses, were $2.03 billion as of June 30, 2010.  The increase in covered loans from December 31, 2009 was due to loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisitions of FPB and SWB in the second quarter of 2010.

 

The Company evaluated the acquired loans from ICB, FPB and SWB and concluded that all loans, with the exception of a small population of acquired loans, would be accounted for under ASC 310-30.  Loans are accounted for under ASC 310-30 when there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually required payments. Total covered loans of $2.08 billion as of June 30, 2010 consist of acquired impaired loans of $2.07 billion that are within the scope of ASC 310-30 and $10.4 million of acquired loans that are outside the scope of ASC 310-30.

 

As of the respective acquisition dates, the preliminary estimates of the contractually required payments receivable for all acquired impaired loans of FPB and SWB were $643.3 million, the cash flows expected to be collected were $378.9 million, and the fair value of the loans was $330.6 million.  These amounts were determined based on the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans, which included the effects of estimated prepayments. Fair value of the acquired loans include estimated credit losses, therefore, an allowance for loan losses is not recorded on the acquisition date.  Interest income is recognized on all acquired impaired loans through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and their expected cash flows.  Certain amounts related to the acquired impaired loans are preliminary estimates and adjustments to these amounts may occur as the company finalizes its analysis of these loans.

 

Changes in the accretable yield for acquired impaired loans were as follows for the period from January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010:

 

(in thousands)

 

Accretable
Yield

 

Balance at January 1, 2010

 

$

687,126

 

Additions

 

48,644

 

Accretion

 

(58,776

)

Reclassifications to nonaccretable yield

 

(114,883

)

Disposals and other

 

5,926

 

Balance at June 30, 2010

 

$

568,037

 

 

Because of the short time period between the closing of the ICB acquisition and year-end 2009, certain 2009 amounts related to the acquired impaired ICB loans were preliminary estimates. In finalizing its analysis of these loans, the Company recorded adjustments to 2009 amounts that are reflected in the Other line of the above table.

 

Covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are generally considered accruing and performing loans as the loans accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are reasonably estimable. Accordingly, acquired impaired loans that are contractually past due are still considered to be accruing and performing loans. If the timing and amount of future cash flows is not reasonably estimable, the loans may be classified as nonaccrual loans and interest income

 

61



Table of Contents

 

is not recognized until the timing and amount of future cash flows can be reasonably estimated. As of June 30, 2010, there were no nonaccrual covered loans.

 

The allowance for loan losses on covered loans was $46.3 million as of June 30, 2010.  In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a provision expense of $46.5 million on covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 as a result of a decrease in projected interest cash flows due to the Company’s revised default forecasts, though the principal credit loss projections are expected to be in line with initial expectations.  The revisions of the default forecasts in the second quarter were based on the results of management’s review of the credit quality of the covered loans and the analysis of the loan performance data since the acquisition of covered loans.  The Company will continue updating the cash flow projections on a quarterly basis.

 

At acquisition date, the Company recorded an FDIC indemnification asset for its FDIC-assisted acquisition of ICB in December 2009 and FPB and SWB in May 2010.  The FDIC indemnification asset represents the present value of the expected reimbursement from the FDIC related to expected losses on acquired loans and OREO. The FDIC indemnification asset from all three acquisitions was $394.0 million at June 30, 2010. See Note 2, Business Combination, for further discussion of the FDIC indemnification asset.

 

As reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, the federal banking regulatory agencies issued final guidance on December 6, 2006 on risk management practices for financial institutions with high or increasing concentrations of commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans on their balance sheets.  The regulatory guidance reiterates the need for sound internal risk management practices for those institutions that have experienced rapid growth in CRE lending, have notable exposure to specific types of CRE, or are approaching or exceeding the supervisory criteria used to evaluate the CRE concentration risk, but the guidance is not to be construed as a limit for CRE exposures.  The supervisory criteria are: total reported loans for construction, land development and other land represent 100 percent of the institution’s total risk-based capital, and both total CRE loans represent 300 percent or more of the institution’s total risk-based capital and the institution’s CRE loan portfolio has increased 50 percent or more within the last 36 months. As of June 30, 2010, total loans for construction, land development and other land represented 46 percent of total risk-based capital; total CRE loans represented 188 percent of total risk-based capital and the total portfolio of loans for construction, land development, other land and CRE increased 31 percent over the last 36 months.

 

The Company’s policy defines subprime loans as loans to applicants who typically have impaired credit histories, reduced repayment capacity, and a relatively higher default probability. Subprime credit risk characteristics may include:

 

·                  Two or more 30-day delinquencies in the last 12 months, or one or more 60-day delinquencies in the last 24 months;

·                  A judgment, foreclosure, repossession, or charge-off in the prior 24 months;

·                  A bankruptcy in the last five years;

·                  A credit bureau risk score (FICO) of 660 or less; and/or

·                 Debt-to-income ratio of 50 percent or greater

 

The Company does not, and has not, offered a subprime loan program. All loans are judgmentally underwritten by reviewing the client’s credit history, payment capacity and collateral value. The Company does not consider loans with the above characteristics to be subprime if strong and verifiable mitigating factors exist.  Mitigating factors include guarantees, low LTV ratios and verified liquidity. As of June 30, 2010, the Company did not have any subprime loans in its loan portfolio based on the Company’s definition.

 

Asset Quality

 

The Company has a comprehensive methodology to monitor credit quality and prudently manage credit concentration within each portfolio.  The methodology includes establishing concentration limits to ensure that the loan portfolio is diversified.  The limits are evaluated quarterly and are intended to mitigate the impact of any segment on the Company’s capital and earnings.  The limits cover major industry groups, geography, product type, loan size and customer relationship.  Additional sub-limits are established for certain industries where the bank has higher exposure.  The concentration limits are approved by the bank’s Credit Policy Committee and reviewed annually by the Audit & Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.

 

The loan portfolios are monitored through delinquency tracking and a dynamic risk rating process that is designed to detect early signs of deterioration.  In addition, once a loan has shown signs of deterioration, it is transferred to a Special

 

62



Table of Contents

 

Assets Department that consists of professionals who specialize in managing problem assets.  An oversight group meets monthly to review the progress of problem loans and other real estate owned.

 

Also, the Company has established portfolio review requirements that include a periodic review and risk assessment by the Risk Management Division that reports to the Audit & Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.

 

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Reserve for Off-Balance Sheet Credit Commitments

 

At June 30, 2010, the allowance for loan and lease losses on non-covered loans was $290.5 million, or 2.53 percent, of outstanding loans and leases excluding covered loans, and the reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments was $19.3 million. The process used for determining the adequacy of the reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments is consistent with the process for the allowance for loan and lease losses.

 

The following tables summarize the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses on non-covered loans and the reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

 

Changes in Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases outstanding, excluding covered loans

 

$

11,483,044

 

$

12,421,342

 

$

11,483,044

 

$

12,421,342

 

Average loans and leases outstanding, excluding covered loans

 

$

11,581,920

 

$

12,354,260

 

$

11,762,122

 

$

12,374,714

 

Allowance for loan and lease losses (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

292,799

 

$

241,586

 

$

288,493

 

$

224,046

 

Loans charged-off:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

(22,680

)

(18,242

)

(36,657

)

(37,414

)

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

(476

)

 

(15,451

)

 

Residential mortgages

 

(620

)

(804

)

(2,080

)

(1,182

)

Real estate construction

 

(12,025

)

(36,189

)

(26,250

)

(50,301

)

Equity lines of credit

 

(345

)

(1,039

)

(557

)

(1,077

)

Installment

 

(5

)

(1,568

)

(5,594

)

(2,330

)

Total loans charged-off

 

(36,151

)

(57,842

)

(86,589

)

(92,304

)

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

1,390

 

959

 

1,835

 

1,672

 

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

74

 

 

81

 

 

Residential mortgages

 

10

 

73

 

79

 

84

 

Real estate construction

 

1,081

 

 

1,123

 

63

 

Equity lines of credit

 

7

 

 

10

 

 

Installment

 

94

 

120

 

430

 

176

 

Total recoveries

 

2,656

 

1,152

 

3,558

 

1,995

 

Net loans charged-off

 

(33,495

)

(56,690

)

(83,031

)

(90,309

)

Provision for credit losses

 

32,000

 

70,000

 

87,000

 

120,000

 

Transfers (to) from reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments

 

(812

)

1,122

 

(1,970

)

2,281

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

290,492

 

$

256,018

 

$

290,492

 

$

256,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net charge-offs to average loans and leases, excluding covered loans (annualized)

 

(1.16

)%

(1.84

)%

(1.42

)%

(1.47

)%

Allowance for loan and lease losses to total period-end loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

2.53

%

2.06

%

2.53

%

2.06

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

18,498

 

$

21,544

 

$

17,340

 

$

22,703

 

Provision for credit losses/transfers

 

812

 

(1,122

)

1,970

 

(2,281

)

Balance, end of period

 

$

19,310

 

$

20,422

 

$

19,310

 

$

20,422

 

 


(1) The allowance for loan and lease losses does not include any amounts related to covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30.

 

63



Table of Contents

 

The allowance for loan losses on covered loans was $46.3 million as of June 30, 2010.  There was no allowance for loan losses on covered loans at June 30, 2009.  In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a provision expense of $46.5 million on covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 as a result of a decrease in projected interest cash flows due to the Company’s revised default forecasts, though the principal credit loss projections are expected to be in line with initial expectations.  The revisions of the default forecasts in the second quarter are based on the results of management’s review of the credit quality of the covered loans and the analysis of the loan performance data since the acquisition of covered loans.  The Company will continue updating the cash flow projections on a quarterly basis.

 

Impaired Loans

 

Loans, other than those included in large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans, are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled interest payments. The assessment for impairment occurs when and while such loans are on nonaccrual, or when the loan has been restructured. When a loan with unique risk characteristics has been identified as being impaired, the amount of impairment will be measured by the Company using discounted cash flows, except when it is determined that the primary (remaining) source of repayment for the loan is the operation or liquidation of the underlying collateral. In these cases, the current fair value of the collateral, reduced by costs to sell, will be used in place of discounted cash flows. Where the carrying value of the impaired loan is greater than the fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell, the Company specifically establishes an allowance for loan and lease losses to cover the deficiency.  The Company does not maintain a reserve for impaired loans where the carrying value of the loan is less than the fair value of the collateral, reduced by costs to sell.  As a final alternative, the observable market price of the debt may be used to assess impairment. All nonaccrual loans greater than $500,000 are considered impaired and are individually analyzed.  Impaired loans with commitments of less than $500,000 are aggregated for the purpose of measuring impairment using historical loss factors as a means of measurement.

 

If the measurement of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (including accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), an impairment allowance is recognized by creating or adjusting the existing allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The Company’s policy is to record cash receipts on impaired loans first as reductions in principal and then as interest income.

 

Impaired loans were $262.0 million at June 30, 2010, $375.7 million at December 31, 2009 and $365.3 million at June 30, 2009.  At June 30, 2010, there were $251.8 million of impaired loans included in nonaccrual loans, with an allowance allocation of $26.5 million. Impaired loans with an allocated allowance were $141.1 million and impaired loans without an allocated allowance were $120.9 million. The remaining $8.6 million of nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2010 are loans under $500,000 that were not individually evaluated for impairment.  At December 31, 2009, there were $375.7 million of impaired loans included in nonaccrual loans, with an allowance allocation of $55.8 million. At June 30, 2009, there were $365.3 million of impaired loans included in nonaccrual loans that had an allowance of $51.6 million allocated to them. The remaining $13.0 million of nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, are loans under $500,000 that were not individually evaluated for impairment.

 

Nonaccrual, Past Due and Restructured Loans

 

Total nonperforming assets (nonaccrual loans and OREO), excluding covered assets, were $314.6 million, or 2.73 percent of total loans and OREO, excluding covered assets, at June 30, 2010, compared with $442.0 million, or 3.62 percent, at December 31, 2009, and $396.3 million, or 3.19 percent, at June 30, 2009.  The Company had non-covered OREO of $54.5 million, $53.3 million and $18.1 million at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Nonperforming covered assets consist of OREO of $98.8 million at June 30, 2010 and $60.6 million at December 31, 2009.

 

Troubled debt restructured loans were $27.5 million, before specific reserves of $3.9 million, at June 30, 2010. Troubled debt restructured loans were $11.2 million, before specific reserves of $1.0 million, at December 31, 2009. At June 30, 2009, the Company had no troubled debt restructured loans. There were no related commitments to lend additional funds on restructured loans at June 30, 2010.

 

64



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents information about nonaccrual loans, OREO and loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments and still accruing:

 

Nonaccrual Loans and OREO

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2009

 

Nonaccrual loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

$

46,530

 

$

81,989

 

$

80,372

 

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

57,155

 

76,027

 

36,112

 

Residential mortgages

 

11,506

 

15,488

 

17,262

 

Real estate construction

 

138,909

 

202,605

 

237,828

 

Equity lines of credit

 

3,909

 

3,422

 

2,919

 

Installment

 

2,109

 

9,176

 

3,768

 

Total

 

260,118

 

388,707

 

378,261

 

OREO, excluding covered OREO

 

54,451

 

53,308

 

18,064

 

Total nonperforming assets, excluding covered assets

 

$

314,569

 

$

442,015

 

$

396,325

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered OREO

 

$

98,841

 

$

60,558

 

$

 

Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans, excluding covered loans

 

2.27

%

3.20

%

3.05

%

Nonperforming assets, excluding covered assets, as a percentage of total loans and OREO, excluding covered assets

 

2.73

 

3.62

 

3.19

 

Allowance for loan and lease losses to nonaccrual loans

 

111.68

 

74.22

 

67.68

 

Allowance for loan and lease losses to total nonperforming assets, excluding covered OREO

 

92.35

 

65.27

 

64.60

 

Allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans and leases, excluding covered loans

 

2.53

 

2.38

 

2.06

 

Loans 90 days or more past due on accrual status, excluding covered loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

$

149

 

$

3,651

 

$

 

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

 

1,582

 

 

Residential mortgages

 

640

 

456

 

 

Total

 

$

789

 

$

5,689

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans 90 days or more past due on accrual status

 

$

362,722

 

$

173,309

 

$

 

 

Company policy requires that a loan be placed on nonaccrual status if either principal or interest payments are 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well secured and in process of collection, or if full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain, regardless of the time period involved.  Loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are generally considered accruing and performing loans as the loans accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are reasonably estimable. Accordingly, acquired impaired loans that are contractually past due are still considered to be accruing and performing loans. If the timing and amount of future cash flows is not reasonably estimable, the loans may be classified as nonaccrual loans and interest income is not recognized until the timing and amount of future cash flows can be reasonably estimated.

 

Loans 30 to 89 days delinquent, excluding covered loans, were $82.5 million at June 30, 2010, $55.7 million at December 31, 2009 and $154.7 million at June 30, 2009.  Covered loans that are 30 to 89 days delinquent were $56.3 million at June 30, 2010 and $107.7 million at December 31, 2009. Loans 90 days or more past due on accrual status, excluding covered loans, were $0.8 million at June 30, 2010 and $5.7 million at December 31, 2009. There were no loans 90 days or more past due on accrual status at June 30, 2009.  Covered loans that were 90 days or more past due on accrual status were $362.7 million at June 30, 2010 and $173.3 million at December 31, 2009.

 

65



Table of Contents

 

Nonaccrual loans were $260.1 million at June 30, 2010, a decrease from $388.7 million at December 31, 2009 and $378.3 million at June 30, 2009.  Net charge-offs in the second quarter of 2010 were $33.5 million, or 1.16 percent of average loans and leases, excluding covered loans, compared with $56.7 million, or 1.84 percent, for the second quarter of 2009. Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $83.0 million, or 1.42 percent of average loans and leases, excluding covered loans, compared with $90.3 million, or 1.47 percent, for the year-earlier period.  In accordance with the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses methodology and in response to fluctuations in nonaccrual loans and net charge-offs, the Company decreased its provision for loan and lease losses to $32.0 million and $87.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with $70.0 million and $120.0 million for the year-earlier periods. The allowance for loan and lease losses on non-covered loans was $290.5 million as of June 30, 2010, compared to $288.5 million as of December 31, 2009 and $256.0 million as of June 30, 2009. The ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases, excluding covered loans, increased to 2.53 percent at June 30, 2010 from 2.38 percent at December 31, 2009 and 2.06 percent at June 30, 2009. The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of nonperforming assets, excluding covered assets, was 92.4 percent, 65.3 percent, and 64.6 percent at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.  The Company believes that its allowance for loan and lease losses continues to be adequate.

 

The table below summarizes the activity in nonaccrual loans:

 

Changes in Nonaccrual Loans

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

330,016

 

$

313,641

 

$

388,707

 

$

211,142

 

Loans placed on nonaccrual

 

22,357

 

183,147

 

90,512

 

334,063

 

Charge-offs

 

(31,866

)

(49,972

)

(77,185

)

(81,377

)

Loans returned to accrual status

 

(4,339

)

(8,875

)

(4,827

)

(11,053

)

Repayments (including interest applied to principal)

 

(50,251

)

(43,944

)

(110,193

)

(57,527

)

Transfers to OREO

 

(5,799

)

(15,736

)

(26,896

)

(16,987

)

Balance, end of period

 

$

260,118

 

$

378,261

 

$

260,118

 

$

378,261

 

 

In addition to loans disclosed above as past due or nonaccrual, management has also identified $44.2 million of loans to 29 borrowers as of July 26, 2010, where the ability to comply with the present loan payment terms in the future is questionable.  However, the inability of the borrowers to comply with repayment terms was not sufficiently probable to place the loan on nonaccrual status at June 30, 2010, and the identification of these loans is not necessarily indicative of whether the loans will be placed on nonaccrual status. This amount was determined based on analysis of information known to management about the borrowers’ financial condition and current economic conditions. As of April 28, 2010, management had identified $61.4 million of loans to 43 borrowers where the ability to comply with the loan payment terms in the future was questionable. Management’s classification of credits as nonaccrual, restructured or problems does not necessarily indicate that the principal is uncollectible in whole or part.

 

The Company has taken and continues to take steps to address deterioration in credit quality in various segments of its loan portfolio. Deterioration has been centered in the land, acquisition and development and construction portfolios with lesser deterioration in its commercial loans portfolio.  These steps have included tightening underwriting standards, implementation of loss mitigation actions including curtailment of certain commitments and lending to certain sectors, and proactively identifying, managing, and resolving problem loans.

 

Based on these efforts, there are indications that the negative trends the Company saw in 2009 have begun to abate, although the Company expects non-accruals and charge offs to remain at elevated levels through 2010.  The trends in 2009 were exacerbated by the decline in land values and a severe recession in Nevada.  The Company has reappraised the portfolios that are under stress and adjusted the allowance for loan and lease losses accordingly.  While there could be further value deterioration, the Company believes that it will be significantly less than experienced in 2009.

 

66



Table of Contents

 

Other Real Estate Owned

 

OREO was $153.3 million, $113.9 million and $18.1 million as of June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.  The OREO balance at June 30, 2010 includes covered OREO of $98.8 million compared with $60.6 million at December 31, 2009. Covered OREO represents OREO covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements in the acquisitions of ICB, FPB and SWB.

 

Excluding covered OREO, the increase in remaining OREO was a result of new foreclosures, offset by sales and valuation write-downs.  Excluding covered OREO, the Company recognized valuation write downs on OREO totaling $7.4 million and $18.4 million in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared with $0.6 million for the quarter and six month periods in the prior year.  The Company recognized $0.4 million and $1.0 million net gain on the sale of OREO, excluding covered OREO, in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. There were no gains or losses on the sale of OREO in the first six months of 2009.

 

Other Assets

 

The following table presents information on other assets:

 

Other Assets

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2009

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

$

62,019

 

$

74,929

 

$

61,290

 

Other accrued income

 

12,303

 

12,070

 

14,970

 

Deferred compensation fund assets

 

43,885

 

44,564

 

37,133

 

Stock in government agencies

 

128,149

 

123,217

 

54,163

 

Private equity and alternative investments

 

37,467

 

37,416

 

38,690

 

Mark-to-market on derivatives

 

60,619

 

52,309

 

53,058

 

Income tax receivable

 

90,313

 

61,322

 

 

Prepaid FDIC assessment

 

73,236

 

85,127

 

 

FDIC receivable

 

100,559

 

27,542

 

 

Other

 

103,381

 

94,286

 

63,669

 

Total other assets

 

$

711,931

 

$

612,782

 

$

322,973

 

 

Deposits

 

Deposits totaled $17.97 billion, $17.38 billion and $14.50 billion at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The increase in period end deposits from June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009 was primarily attributable to the acquisitions of ICB in December 2009 and FPB and SWB in May 2010.  Core deposits, which include noninterest-bearing deposits and interest-bearing deposits excluding time deposits of $100,000 and over, provide a stable source of low cost funding. Core deposits totaled $16.82 billion, $15.73 billion and $13.25 billion at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and represented 94 percent, 91 percent and 91 percent of total deposits for the same periods.

 

Average deposits totaled $17.60 billion for the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 12 percent from $15.73 billion for the fourth quarter of 2009, and 26 percent from $14.02 billion the second quarter of 2009. Average non-interest bearing deposits for the second quarter of 2010 increased 3 percent from the fourth quarter of 2009 and 18 percent from the second quarter of 2009. Treasury Services deposit balances, which consists primarily of title, escrow and property management deposits, averaged $1.41 billion in the second quarter of 2010, up 45 percent from the same period in 2009 and 33 percent from the fourth quarter of 2009 due to the addition of new clients, an increase in residential real estate activity and a modest improvement in commercial real estate and apartment financing in certain markets.

 

67



Table of Contents

 

Borrowed Funds

 

Borrowed funds provide an additional source of funding for loan growth, although increased deposit growth in 2009 and 2010 reduced the Company’s short-term borrowings balance. Short-term borrowings include federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, treasury tax and loan notes and FHLB borrowings. The average balance of short-term borrowings decreased to $183.7 million for the second quarter of 2010, from $237.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2009 and $560.9 million for the second quarter of 2009.

 

Other borrowings include ten-year subordinated notes issued by the Bank and Corporation, senior notes issued by the Corporation and trust preferred securities. The average balance of other borrowings increased to $803.1 million for the second quarter of 2010, from $638.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2009 and $404.8 million for the second quarter of 2009.

 

Off-Balance Sheet

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, letters of credit, and financial guarantees; and to invest in private equity and affordable housing funds.  These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount reflected in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

Exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, letters of credit, and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a client as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since a portion of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each client’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.

 

The Company had off-balance sheet credit commitments totaling $4.67 billion at June 30, 2010, compared with $4.68 billion and $5.10 billion at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Substantially all of the Company’s loan commitments are on a variable rate basis and are comprised primarily of real estate and commercial loan commitments. In addition, the Company had $560.6 million outstanding in bankers’ acceptances and letters of credit of which $546.1 million relate to standby letters of credit at June 30, 2010.  At December 31, 2009, the Company had $578.1 million in outstanding bankers’ acceptances and letters of credit of which $567.3 million relate to standby letters of credit.  At June 30, 2009, the Company had $602.6 million in outstanding bankers’ acceptances and letters of credit of which $590.0 million relate to standby letters of credit.

 

As of June 30, 2010, the Company had private equity fund, alternative investment fund and other commitments of $65.4 million, of which $47.6 million was funded.  As of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the Company had private equity and alternative investment fund commitments of $68.4 million and $68.7 million, respectively, of which $51.3 million and $48.0 million was funded.

 

In connection with the liquidation of an investment acquired in a previous bank merger, the Company has an outstanding long-term indemnity.  The maximum liability under the indemnity is $23 million, but the Company does not expect to make any payments under the terms of this indemnity.

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

Under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, fair value for financial reporting purposes is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly market transaction between market participants at the measurement date (reporting date). Fair value is based on an exit price in the principal market or most advantageous market in which the reporting entity could transact.

 

68


 


Table of Contents

 

For each asset and liability required to be reported at fair value, management has identified the unit of account and valuation premise to be applied for purposes of measuring fair value. The unit of account is the level at which an asset or liability is aggregated or disaggregated.  The valuation premise is a concept that determines whether an asset is measured on a standalone basis or in combination with other assets. The Company measures its assets and liabilities on a standalone basis then aggregates assets and liabilities with similar characteristics for disclosure purposes.

 

Fair Value Hierarchy

 

Management employs market standard valuation techniques in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities.  Inputs used in valuation techniques are based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.  The inputs used in valuation techniques are prioritized as follows:

 

Level 1—Quoted market prices in an active market for identical assets and liabilities.

 

Level 2—Observable inputs including quoted prices (other than Level 1) in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities and default rates, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

 

Level 3—Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available.

 

The Company utilizes quoted market prices to measure fair value to the extent available (Level 1). If market prices are not available, fair value measurements are based on models that use primarily market-based assumptions including interest rate yield curves, anticipated prepayment rates, default rates and foreign currency rates (Level 2). In certain circumstances, market observable inputs for model-based valuation techniques may not be available and the Company is required to make judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in estimating the fair value of a financial instrument    (Level 3). Refer to Note 3, Fair Value Measurements, to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on fair value measurements.

 

At June 30, 2010, $4.95 billion, or approximately 23 percent, of the Company’s total assets were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The majority of these financial assets were valued using Level 1 or Level 2 inputs.  Less than a quarter of one percent of total assets are measured using Level 3 inputs.  At June 30, 2010, $31.7 million of the Company’s total liabilities were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 1 or Level 2 inputs.

 

At June 30, 2010, $212.6 million, or approximately 1 percent of the Company’s total assets, were recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets were measured using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. No liabilities were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2010.

 

69



Table of Contents

 

CAPITAL ADEQUACY REQUIREMENT

 

The following table presents the regulatory standards for well capitalized institutions and the capital ratios for the Corporation and the Bank at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009:

 

 

 

Regulatory
Well-Capitalized
Standards

 

June 30,
2010

 

December 31,
2009

 

June 30,
2009

 

City National Corporation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 leverage

 

N/A

%

7.96

%

9.48

%

10.16

%

Tier 1 risk-based capital

 

6.00

 

11.69

 

12.20

 

12.35

 

Total risk-based capital

 

10.00

 

14.68

 

15.15

 

14.18

 

Tangible common shareholders equity to tangible assets (1)

 

N/A

 

6.65

 

6.15

 

7.35

 

Tier 1 common shareholders’ equity to risk-based assets (2)

 

N/A

 

9.68

 

8.91

 

9.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

City National Bank

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 leverage

 

5.00

%

8.27

%

8.72

%

8.52

%

Tier 1 risk-based capital

 

6.00

 

12.19

 

11.23

 

10.35

 

Total risk-based capital

 

10.00

 

14.99

 

13.96

 

12.04

 

 


(1)

Tangible common shareholders’ equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents common shareholders’ equity less identifiable intangible assets and goodwill divided by total assets less identifiable assets and goodwill. Management reviews tangible common shareholders’ equity to tangible assets in evaluating the Company’s capital levels and has included this ratio in response to market participant interest in tangible common shareholders’ equity as a measure of capital. See reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure to this non-GAAP financial measure below.

 

 

(2)

Tier 1 common shareholders’ equity to risk-based assets is calculated by dividing (a) Tier 1 capital less non-common components including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries and qualifying trust preferred securities by (b) risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 capital and risk-weighted assets are calculated in accordance with applicable bank regulatory guidelines. This ratio is a non-GAAP measure that is used by investors, analysts and bank regulatory agencies to assess the capital position of financial services companies. Management reviews this measure in evaluating the Company’s capital levels and has included this measure in response to market participant interest in the Tier 1 common shareholders’ equity to risk based assets ratio. See reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure to this non-GAAP financial measure below.

 

Reconciliation of GAAP financial measure to non-GAAP financial measure:

 

(in thousands)

 

June 30,
2010

 

December 31,
2009

 

June 30,
2009

 

Common shareholders’ equity

 

$

1,901,771

 

$

1,790,275

 

$

1,757,438

 

Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets

 

(524,820

)

(525,583

)

(496,562

)

Tangible common shareholders’ equity (A)

 

$

1,376,951

 

$

1,264,692

 

$

1,260,876

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

21,231,447

 

$

21,078,757

 

$

17,660,785

 

Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets

 

(524,820

)

(525,583

)

(496,562

)

Tangible assets (B)

 

$

20,706,627

 

$

20,553,174

 

$

17,164,223

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tangible common shareholders’ equity to tangible assets (A)/(B)

 

6.65

%

6.15

%

7.35

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 capital

 

1,614,341

 

1,760,136

 

1,714,912

 

Less: Preferred stock

 

 

(196,048

)

(391,091

)

Less: Noncontrolling interest

 

(25,088

)

(26,339

)

(25,387

)

Less: Trust preferred securities

 

(252,088

)

(252,036

)

(5,155

)

Tier 1 common shareholders’ equity (C)

 

$

1,337,165

 

$

1,285,713

 

$

1,293,279

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-weighted assets (D)

 

$

13,806,764

 

$

14,430,857

 

$

13,886,674

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 common shareholders’ equity to risk-based assets (C)/(D)

 

9.68

%

8.91

%

9.31

%

 

70



Table of Contents

 

Tier 1 capital ratios at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 include preferred stock issued by real estate investment trust subsidiaries of the Bank, which is included in Noncontrolling interest in the consolidated balance sheets, and trust preferred securities issued by unconsolidated capital trust subsidiaries of the holding company.  Tier 1 capital ratios for December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 also include preferred stock issued under the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, which was repurchased in two separate transactions in December 2009 and March 2010.  The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires the Federal Reserve Board to establish capital requirements that would, among other things, eliminate the Tier 1 treatment of trust preferred securities following a phase-in period expected to begin in 2013. Accordingly, the Corporation will evaluate its alternatives, including the potential for early redemption of some or all of its trust preferred securities, based on such considerations it may consider relevant, including dividend rates, the specifics of the future capital requirements, capital market conditions and other factors.

 

On November 21, 2008, the Corporation received aggregate proceeds of $400 million from the Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in exchange for 400,000 shares of cumulative perpetual preferred stock and a 10-year warrant to purchase up to 1,128,668 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $53.16 per share. The preferred stock and warrant were recorded in equity on a relative fair value basis at the time of issuance. The preferred stock was valued by calculating the present value of expected cash flows and the warrant was valued using an option valuation model. The allocated values of the preferred stock and warrant were approximately $389.9 million and $10.1 million, respectively. Cumulative dividends on the preferred stock were payable quarterly at the rate of 5 percent for the first five years and increasing to 9 percent thereafter. The warrant has a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an exercise price, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, equal to $53.16 per share of the common stock.

 

In December 2009, the Corporation repurchased $200 million, or 200,000 shares, of the TARP preferred stock that it had sold to the Treasury. On March 3, 2010, the Corporation repurchased the remaining $200 million, or 200,000 shares, of TARP preferred stock. The repurchase on March 3, 2010 resulted in a one-time, after-tax, non-cash charge of $3.8 million. On April 8, 2010, the Company repurchased its outstanding common stock warrant issued to the Treasury. The repurchase price of $18.5 million was recorded as a charge to additional paid-in capital.

 

The ratio of period-end equity to period-end assets as of June 30, 2010 was 9.08 percent, compared with 9.55 percent at December 31, 2009 and 12.31 percent at June 30, 2009.

 

LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT

 

The Company continues to manage its liquidity through the combination of core deposits, certificates of deposits, short-term federal funds purchased, sales of securities under repurchase agreements, collateralized borrowing lines at the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and a portfolio of securities available-for-sale.  Liquidity is also provided by maturities and pay downs on securities and loans.

 

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

 

Market risk results from the variability of future cash flows and earnings due to changes in the financial markets.  These changes may also impact the fair values of loans, securities and borrowings. The values of financial instruments may fluctuate because of interest rate changes, foreign currency exchange rate changes or other market changes.  The Company’s asset/liability management process entails the evaluation, measurement and management of interest rate risk, market risk and liquidity risk. The principal objective of asset/liability management is to optimize net interest income subject to margin volatility and liquidity constraints over the long term. Margin volatility results when the rate reset (or repricing) characteristics of assets are materially different from those of the Company’s liabilities. The Board of Directors approves asset/liability policies and annually reviews and approves the limits within which the risks must be managed. The Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”), which is comprised of senior management and key risk management individuals, sets risk management targets within the broader limits approved by the Board, monitors the risks and periodically reports results to the Board.

 

A quantitative and qualitative discussion about market risk is included on pages 64 to 69 of the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

71



Table of Contents

 

Net Interest Simulation: As part of its overall interest rate risk management process, the Company performs stress tests on net interest income projections based on a variety of factors, including interest rate levels, changes in the relationship between the prime rate and short-term interest rates, and the shape of the yield curve. The Company uses a simulation model to estimate the severity of this risk and to develop mitigation strategies, including interest-rate hedges. The magnitude of the change is determined from historical volatility analysis. The assumptions used in the model are updated periodically and reviewed and approved by ALCO. In addition, the Board of Directors has adopted limits within which interest rate exposure must be contained. Within these broader limits, ALCO sets management guidelines to further contain interest rate risk exposure.

 

The Company is naturally asset-sensitive due to its large portfolio of rate-sensitive commercial loans that are funded in part by noninterest bearing and rate-stable core deposits. As a result, if there are no significant changes in the mix of assets and liabilities, the net interest margin increases when interest rates increase and decreases when interest rates decrease. The Company uses a simulation model to estimate the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income. Interest rate scenarios include stable rates and a 400 basis point parallel shift in the yield curve occurring gradually over a two-year period. The model is used to project net interest income assuming no changes in loans or deposit mix as it stood at June 30, 2010 as well as a dynamic simulation that includes changes to balance sheet mix in response to changes in interest rates. In the dynamic simulation, loans and deposit balances are modeled based on experience in previous vigorous economic recovery cycles.  Loan yields and deposit rates change over the simulation horizon based on current spreads and adjustment factors that are statistically derived using historical rate and balance sheet data.

 

As of June 30, 2010, the Federal funds target rate was at a range of zero percent to 0.25 percent. Further declines in interest rates are not expected to significantly reduce earning asset yields but are expected to lower interest expense somewhat thus improving net interest margin slightly. At June 30, 2010, a gradual 400 basis point parallel increase in the yield curve over the next 24 months assuming a static balance sheet would result in an increase in projected net interest income of approximately 2.2 percent in year one and a 9.4 percent increase in year two. This compares to an increase in projected net interest income of 3.8 percent in year one and a 17.0 percent increase in year two at June 30, 2009.  Interest rate sensitivity has decreased due to changes in the mix of the balance sheet, primarily significant growth in non-rate sensitive deposits, TARP repayment and other balance sheet changes related to the recent acquisitions. The dynamic simulation incorporates balance sheet changes resulting from a gradual 400 basis point increase in rates.  In combination, these rate and balance sheet effects result in an increase in projected net interest income of approximately 1.9 percent in year one and 15.6 percent increase in year two.  The Company’s interest rate risk exposure remains within Board limits and ALCO guidelines.

 

The company’s loan portfolio includes floating rate loans which are tied to short-term market index rates, adjustable rate loans for which the initial rate is fixed for a period from one year to as much as ten years, and fixed-rate loans whose interest rate does not change through the life of the transaction.  The following table shows the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio by major loan category as of June 30, 2010.  Each loan category is further divided into Floating, Adjustable and Fixed rate components.  Floating rate loans are generally tied to either the Prime rate or to a LIBOR based index.

 

 

 

Floating Rate

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

(in millions)

 

Prime

 

LIBOR

 

Total

 

Adjustable

 

Fixed

 

Loans

 

Commercial

 

$

1,857

 

$

1,311

 

$

3,168

 

$

44

 

$

1,070

 

$

4,282

 

Commercial real estate mortgages

 

213

 

478

 

691

 

90

 

1,298

 

2,079

 

Residential mortgages

 

49

 

25

 

74

 

1,831

 

1,673

 

3,578

 

Real estate construction

 

415

 

176

 

591

 

 

38

 

629

 

Equity lines of credit

 

742

 

 

742

 

 

 

742

 

Installment

 

90

 

 

90

 

 

83

 

173

 

Covered loans

 

174

 

81

 

255

 

1,631

 

195

 

2,081

 

Total loans and leases

 

$

3,540

 

$

2,071

 

$

5,611

 

$

3,596

 

$

4,357

 

$

13,564

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of portfolio

 

26

%

15

%

41

%

27

%

32

%

100

%

 

It is common for floating rate loans to have a “floor” rate which is absolute and below which the loan rate will not fall even though market rates may be unusually low.  At June 30, 2010, $5.61 billion (41 percent) of the Company’s loan portfolio was floating rate, of which $3.09 billion (55 percent) was not impacted by rate floors.  This is because either the loan contract does not specify a minimum or floor rate, or because the contractual loan rate is above the minimum rate specified in the loan contract.  Of the loans which were at their contractual minimum rate, $1.39 billion (25 percent) were within 0.75 percent of the contractual loan rate absent the effects of the floor.  Thus, the rate on these loans will be relatively

 

72



Table of Contents

 

responsive to increases in the underlying Prime or LIBOR index, and all will adjust upwards should the underlying index increase by more than 0.75 percent.  Only $203 million of floating rate loans have floors that are more than 2.00 percent above the contractual rate formula. Thus, the yield on the Company’s floating rate loan portfolio is expected to be highly responsive to changes in market rates.  The following table shows the balance of loans in the Floating Rate portfolio stratified by spread between the current loan rate and the floor rate as of June 30, 2010:

 

 

 

Loans with No
Floor and Current
Rate Greater than

 

Interest Rate Increase Needed for Loans Currently
at Floor Rate to Become Floating

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Floor

 

< 0.75%

 

0.76% - 2.00%

 

> 2.00%

 

Total

 

Prime

 

$

1,539

 

$

1,121

 

$

767

 

$

114

 

$

3,541

 

LIBOR

 

1,553

 

269

 

159

 

89

 

2,070

 

Total floating rate loans

 

$

3,092

 

$

1,390

 

$

926

 

$

203

 

$

5,611

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of total floating rate loans

 

55

%

25

%

16

%

4

%

100

%

 

Economic Value of Equity: The economic value equity (“EVE”) model is used to evaluate the vulnerability of the market value of shareholders’ equity to changes in interest rates.  The EVE model calculates the expected cash flow of all of the Company’s assets and liabilities under sharply higher and lower interest rate scenarios. The present value of these cash flows is calculated by discounting them using the interest rates for that scenario. The difference between the present value of assets and the present value of liabilities in each scenario is the EVE. The assumptions about the timing of cash flows, level of interest rates and shape of the yield curve are the same as those used in the net interest income simulation. They are updated periodically and are reviewed by ALCO at least annually.

 

The model indicates that the EVE is somewhat vulnerable to a sudden and substantial increase in interest rates.  As of June 30, 2010, an instantaneous 200 basis point increase in interest rates results in a 3.5 percent decline in EVE comparable to a 3.7 percent decline a year-earlier. Measurement of a 200 basis point decrease in rates as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 is not meaningful due to the current low rate environment.

 

The following table presents the notional amount and fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements according to the specific asset or liability hedged:

 

 

 

June 30, 2010

 

December 31, 2009

 

June 30, 2009

 

(in millions)

 

Notional
Amount

 

Fair
Value

 

Duration
(Years)

 

Notional
Amount

 

Fair
Value

 

Duration
(Years)

 

Notional
Amount

 

Fair
Value

 

Duration
(Years)

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Swaps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

 

$

10.0

 

$

0.5

 

0.9

 

$

20.0

 

$

0.9

 

0.9

 

$

20.0

 

$

1.3

 

1.4

 

Long-term and subordinated debt

 

358.2

 

27.8

 

1.8

 

358.2

 

27.7

 

2.3

 

362.4

 

29.2

 

2.8

 

Total fair value hedge swaps

 

368.2

 

28.3

 

1.8

 

378.2

 

28.6

 

2.2

 

382.4

 

30.5

 

2.7

 

Cash Flow Hedge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Swaps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Dollar LIBOR based loans

 

50.0

 

0.3

 

 

350.0

 

6.6

 

1.6

 

200.0

 

9.2

 

1.3

 

Prime based loans

 

50.0

 

0.6

 

0.2

 

100.0

 

1.9

 

0.6

 

125.0

 

3.4

 

0.8

 

Total cash flow hedge swaps

 

100.0

 

0.9

 

0.1

 

450.0

 

8.5

 

1.4

 

325.0

 

12.6

 

1.1

 

Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Swaps

 

$

468.2

 

$

29.2

(1)

1.4

 

$

828.2

 

$

37.1

(1)

1.8

 

$

707.4

 

$

43.1

(1)

2.0

 

 


(1)  Net fair value is the estimated net gain (loss) to settle derivative contracts. The net fair value is the sum of the mark-to-market asset, mark-to-market liability (if applicable) and net interest receivable or payable.

 

The Company’s swap agreements require the deposit of cash or marketable debt securities as collateral based on certain risk thresholds. These requirements apply individually to the Corporation and to the Bank. Additionally, certain of the Company’s swap agreements contain credit-risk-related contingent features. Under these agreements, the collateral requirements are based on the Company’s credit rating from the major credit rating agencies. The amount of collateral required varies by counterparty based on a range of credit ratings that correspond with exposure thresholds established in the derivative agreements. If the credit rating on the Company’s debt were to fall below the level associated with a particular

 

73



Table of Contents

 

exposure threshold and the derivatives with a counterparty are in a net liability position that exceeds that threshold, the counterparty could request immediate payment or delivery of collateral for the difference between the net liability amount and the exposure threshold. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position on June 30, 2010 was $12.0 million. The Company was not required to deliver collateral because the net liability position did not exceed the exposure threshold amount at the Company’s current credit rating.

 

Interest-rate swap agreements involve the exchange of fixed and variable-rate interest payments based upon a notional principal amount and maturity date. The Company’s interest-rate swaps had $6.0 million and $12.5 million of credit risk exposure at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The credit exposure represents the cost to replace, on a present value basis and at current market rates, all contracts by trading counterparty having an aggregate positive market value, net of margin collateral received.  The Company enters into master netting agreements with swap counterparties to mitigate credit risk. Under these agreements, the net amount due from or payable to each counterparty is settled on the contract payment date. Collateral valued at $14.1 million and $20.1 million had been received from swap counterparties at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Additionally, the Company had delivered collateral valued at $6.5 million to a counterparty at June 30, 2010.

 

The Company also offers various derivative products to clients and enters into derivative transactions in due course.  These derivative contracts are offset by paired trades with unrelated third parties. These transactions are not linked to specific Company assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets or to forecasted transactions in a hedge relationship and, therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. The contracts are marked-to-market each reporting period with changes in fair value recorded as part of Other noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income. Fair values are determined from verifiable third-party sources that have considerable experience with the derivative markets. The Company provides client data to the third party source for purposes of calculating the credit valuation component of the fair value measurement of client derivative contracts. At June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had entered into derivative contracts with clients (and offsetting derivative contracts with counterparties) having a notional balance of $1.16 billion and $955.8 million, respectively.

 

ITEM 4.  CONTROL AND PROCEDURES

 

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a - 15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).  Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

 

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

 

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s second fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or was reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

74



Table of Contents

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS

OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

 

We have made forward-looking statements in this document about the Company, for which the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor provisions contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

 

Forward-looking statements are based on management’s knowledge and belief as of today and include information concerning the Company’s possible or assumed future financial condition, and its results of operations, business and earnings outlook. These forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. A number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict, could cause future results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These factors include (1) local, regional and international business, economic and political conditions, (2) volatility in financial markets, including capital and credit markets, (3) significant changes in banking laws or regulations, including without limitation, the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) and the new rules and regulations to be promulgated by supervisory and oversight agencies implementing the new legislation, (4) increases and required prepayments in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation premiums and special federal assessments on financial institutions due to market developments and regulatory changes, (5) changes in the level of nonperforming assets, charge-offs, other real estate owned and provision expense, (6) incorrect assumptions in the value of the loans acquired in FDIC-assisted acquisitions resulting in greater than anticipated losses in the acquired loan portfolios exceeding the losses covered by the loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC, (7) changes in inflation, interest rates, and market liquidity which may impact interest margins and impact funding sources, (8) adequacy of the Company’s enterprise risk management framework, (9) Company’s ability to increase market share and control expenses, (10) Company’s ability to attract new employees and retain and motivate existing employees, (11) increased competition in the Company’s markets, (12) changes in the financial performance and/or condition of the Company’s borrowers, including changes in levels of unemployment, changes in customers’ suppliers, and other counterparties’ performance and creditworthiness, (13) a substantial and permanent loss of either client accounts and/or assets under management at the Company’s investment advisory affiliates or its wealth management division, (14) changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits, (15) soundness of other financial institutions which could adversely affect the Company, (16) protracted labor disputes in the Company’s markets, (17) earthquake, fire or other natural disasters affecting the condition of real estate collateral, (18) the effect of acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses and de novo branching efforts, (19) the impact of changes in regulatory, judicial or legislative tax treatment of business transactions, (20) changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or regulatory agencies, and (21) the success of the Company at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

 

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the statements are made, or to update earnings guidance, including the factors that influence earnings.

 

For a more complete discussion of these risks and uncertainties, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and particularly, Item 1A, titled “Risk Factors.”

 

75



Table of Contents

 

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

Forward-looking statements are based on management’s knowledge and belief as of today and include information concerning the Company’s possible or assumed future financial condition, and its results of operations, business and earnings outlook. These forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. A number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict, could cause future results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These factors include (1) local, regional and international business, economic and political conditions, (2) volatility in financial markets, including capital and credit markets, (3) significant changes in banking laws or regulations, including without limitation, the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) and the new rules and regulations to be promulgated by supervisory and oversight agencies implementing the new legislation, (4) increases and required prepayments in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation premiums and special federal assessments on financial institutions due to market developments and regulatory changes, (5) changes in the level of nonperforming assets, charge-offs, other real estate owned and provision expense, (6) incorrect assumptions in the value of the loans acquired in FDIC-assisted acquisitions resulting in greater than anticipated losses in the acquired loan portfolios exceeding the losses covered by the loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC, (7) changes in inflation, interest rates, and market liquidity which may impact interest margins and impact funding sources, (8) adequacy of the Company’s enterprise risk management framework, (9) Company’s ability to increase market share and control expenses, (10) Company’s ability to attract new employees and retain and motivate existing employees, (11) increased competition in the Company’s markets, (12) changes in the financial performance and/or condition of the Company’s borrowers, including changes in levels of unemployment, changes in customers’ suppliers, and other counterparties’ performance and creditworthiness, (13) a substantial and permanent loss of either client accounts and/or assets under management at the Company’s investment advisory affiliates or its wealth management division, (14) changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits, (15) soundness of other financial institutions which could adversely affect the Company, (16) protracted labor disputes in the Company’s markets, (17) earthquake, fire or other natural disasters affecting the condition of real estate collateral, (18) the effect of acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses and de novo branching efforts, (19) the impact of changes in regulatory, judicial or legislative tax treatment of business transactions, (20) changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or regulatory agencies, and (21) the success of the Company at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

 

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the statements are made, or to update earnings guidance, including the factors that influence earnings.

 

For a more complete discussion of these risks and uncertainties, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and particularly, Item 1A, titled “Risk Factors.”

 

ITEM 2.      UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

(c)  Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchaser.

 

The information required by subsection (c) of this item regarding purchases by the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of equity securities that are registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act is incorporated by reference from that portion of Part I, Item 1 of the report under Note 6.

 

ITEM 4.      RESERVED

 

76



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 6.      EXHIBITS

 

No.

 

 

 

 

 

10.48*

 

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Russell Goldsmith dated June 24, 2010 (Incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2010)

 

 

 

12

 

Statement Re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements

 

 

 

31.1

 

Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

31.2

 

Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

32.0

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 


* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

 

The registrant has not filed with this report copies of the instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant and its subsidiaries for which consolidated or unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed. The registrant agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

77



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION

 

(Registrant)

 

 

DATE: August 6, 2010

/s/ Christopher J. Carey

 

 

 

CHRISTOPHER J. CAREY

 

Executive Vice President and

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

(Authorized Officer and

 

Principal Financial Officer)

 

78