UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

 

Investment Company Act file number

811-21948

 

Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

280 Park Avenue, New York, NY

 

10017

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip code)

 

Tina M. Payne

Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc.

280 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10017

(Name and address of agent for service)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(212) 832-3232

 

 

Date of fiscal year end:

December 31

 

 

Date of reporting period:

December 31, 2016

 

 



 

Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.

 



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

To Our Shareholders:

We would like to share with you our report for the year ended December 31, 2016. The net asset value (NAV) at that date was $13.02 per common share. The Fund's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and its share price can differ from its NAV; at year end, the Fund's closing price on the NYSE was $11.70.

The total returns for the Fund and its comparative benchmarks were:

  Six Months Ended
December 31, 2016
  Year Ended
December 31, 2016
 
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity
Fund at NAVa
   

5.20

%

   

15.31

%

 
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity
Fund at Market Valuea
   

5.75

%

   

16.67

%

 
Morningstar U.S. All Taxable Ex-Foreign
Equity Indexb
   

3.80

%

   

15.27

%

 
S&P 500 Indexb    

7.82

%

   

11.96

%

 

The performance data quoted represent past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The investment return and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate and shares, if sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Current total returns of the Fund can be obtained by visiting our website at cohenandsteers.com. The Fund's returns assume the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at prices obtained under the Fund's dividend reinvestment plan. NAV returns reflect fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, without which the returns would be lower. Index performance does not reflect the deduction of any fees, taxes or expenses. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. Performance figures for periods shorter than one year are not annualized.

The Fund makes regular distributions at a level rate (the Policy). On September 15, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Fund approved a change in the frequency of dividends distributed to shareholders from quarterly to monthly effective October 1, 2016. Distributions paid by the Fund are subject to recharacterization for tax purposes and are taxable up to the amount of the Fund's investment company taxable income and net realized gains. As a result of the Policy, the Fund may pay distributions in excess of the Fund's investment company taxable income and net realized gains. This excess would be a return of capital distributed from the Fund's assets. Distributions of capital decrease the Fund's total assets

a  As a closed-end investment company, the price of the Fund's NYSE-traded shares will be set by market forces and can deviate from the NAV per share of the Fund.

b  The Morningstar U.S. All Taxable Ex-Foreign Equity Index measures the market-capitalization-weighted total return of taxable equity and fixed income closed-end funds; it excludes international, regional, and country closed-end funds. Index returns update frequently and are subject to change. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 large-capitalization stocks that is frequently used as a general measure of U.S. stock market performance.


1



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

and, therefore, could have the effect of increasing the Fund's expense ratio. In addition, in order to make these distributions, the Fund may have to sell portfolio securities at a less than opportune time.

Market Review

Equity and fixed income markets finished 2016 with positive total returns, overcoming energy-related turmoil early in the year and surging Treasury yields late in the year. Initially, world markets came under pressure amid soft global economic data and plummeting oil prices. As U.S. economic data firmed and oil moved up from its mid-February lows, markets recovered. In June, the U.K.'s vote to withdraw from the European Union (Brexit) prompted a brief period of market volatility, although sovereign bond yields remained near historically low levels and, in some cases, moved into negative territory.

Beginning in July, strengthening economic data pushed U.S. Treasury yields and equity markets higher, forming headwinds for fixed income in general. After Donald Trump's surprising victory in the U.S. elections in November, U.S. stocks and long-term Treasury rates rose amid expectations that his policies—including a focus on tax cuts, increased fiscal spending, deregulation and protectionism—would likely create inflationary pressures and faster economic growth. In December, the Federal Reserve increased its target interest rate by 0.25% to a range of 0.50% to 0.75% in a move that was fully anticipated.

Almost all closed-end-fund categories experienced positive total returns that generally exceeded underlying NAV returns, reflecting a broad narrowing of discounts, with taxable fixed income funds narrowing the most.

Fund Performance

The Fund had a positive total return for the year and outperformed its benchmark on both a NAV and market-price basis. Our overweight and selection in multi-sector fixed income funds contributed to the Fund's relative performance. As a group, multi-sector funds outperformed the overall taxable fixed income segment due to above average total return on NAV, attractive relative dividend yields and significant discount narrowing.

The Fund's underweight in health-biotech funds contributed to performance, as the category was the largest underperformer in the benchmark and the only equity category that experienced negative returns for the year. Concerns regarding the lack of pricing power at the companies held in these funds appeared to have weighed on demand.

Our overweight in MLP funds further contributed to performance. Gains in the sector were driven by rebalancing in energy commodity supply-demand fundamentals and rising expectations that a Trump administration could create a more favorable environment for future energy-related projects.

The Fund's overweight and selection in covered call funds detracted from performance. Covered call funds underperformed the broader equity segment. Our out-of-benchmark allocation to municipal funds also detracted from performance. Municipal funds, which typically own longer-duration securities that are more sensitive to interest rates, underperformed the overall fixed income category.


2



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

In addition, the Fund's underweight in high-yield funds detracted from performance. High-yield funds outperformed the majority of fixed income categories, as these funds are generally less sensitive to rising interest rates and also benefited from a recovery in energy prices.

Sincerely,

       

 

  DOUGLAS R. BOND

  Portfolio Manager

The views and opinions in the preceding commentary are subject to change without notice and are as of the date of the report. There is no guarantee that any market forecast set forth in the commentary will be realized. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time, should not be relied upon as investment advice and is not intended to predict or depict performance of any investment.

Visit Cohen & Steers online at cohenandsteers.com

For more information about the Cohen & Steers family of mutual funds, visit cohenandsteers.com. Here you will find fund net asset values, fund fact sheets and portfolio highlights, as well as educational resources and timely market updates.

Our website also provides comprehensive information about Cohen & Steers, including our most recent press releases, profiles of our senior investment professionals and their investment approach to each asset class. The Cohen & Steers family of mutual funds invests in major real asset categories including real estate securities, listed infrastructure, commodities and natural resource equities, as well as preferred securities and other income solutions.


3



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

December 31, 2016
Top Ten Holdings
(Unaudited)

Closed-End Fund  

Value

  % of
Net
Assets
 

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund

 

$

15,965,146

     

4.5

   

Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust

   

15,449,457

     

4.4

   

First Trust Energy Income and Growth Fund

   

14,358,618

     

4.1

   

PIMCO Dynamic Credit Income Fund

   

12,644,011

     

3.6

   

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund

   

12,303,490

     

3.5

   

John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund

   

11,586,091

     

3.3

   

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund

   

11,509,117

     

3.2

   

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund

   

11,401,890

     

3.2

   

Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund

   

10,995,090

     

3.1

   

PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II

   

10,527,959

     

3.0

   

Sector Breakdown

(Based on Net Assets)
(Unaudited)


4




COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

December 31, 2016

        Number
of Shares
 

Value

 

CLOSED-END FUNDS

 

96.5%

                 

COMMODITIES

 

0.8%

                 

SPDR Gold sharesa

       

26,030

   

$

2,853,148

   

COVERED CALL

 

14.6%

                 
AllianzGI NFJ Dividend, Interest & Premium
Strategy Fund
       

106,895

     

1,347,946

   

BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund

       

153,384

     

2,102,895

   

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund

       

82,695

     

1,549,704

   

Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II

       

60,448

     

773,734

   
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities
Fund
       

775,547

     

11,509,117

   
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity
Income Fund
       

1,188,743

     

12,303,490

   
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write
Opportunities Fund
       

492,415

     

4,958,619

   
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified
Equity Income Fund
       

1,421,682

     

11,401,890

   

Nuveen Dow 30SM Dynamic Overwrite Fund

       

105,445

     

1,581,675

   

Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund

       

86,642

     

1,608,076

   

Nuveen S&P 500 Buy-Write Income Fund

       

200,492

     

2,550,258

   
             

51,687,404

   

EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY

 

3.0%

                 

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

       

85,686

     

2,999,867

   

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund

       

283,704

     

3,429,981

   

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust PLC

       

557,899

     

4,094,388

   
             

10,524,236

   

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
5



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2016

        Number
of Shares
 

Value

 

EQUITY TAX—ADVANTAGED

 

15.7%

                 

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund

       

777,271

   

$

15,965,146

   
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend
Income Fund
       

330,770

     

4,653,934

   
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend
Opportunities Fund
       

144,173

     

3,000,240

   

Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust

       

770,931

     

15,449,457

   

John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund

       

501,997

     

11,586,091

   

Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Dividend Growth Fund

       

184,903

     

2,575,699

   

Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund

       

224,087

     

2,543,387

   
     

     

55,773,954

   

FINANCIAL

 

2.4%

                 

Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund

       

359,061

     

8,348,168

   

GLOBAL HYBRID (GROWTH & INCOME)

 

1.6%

                 

Clough Global Opportunities Fund

       

278,808

     

2,495,332

   

LMP Capital and Income Fund

       

232,291

     

3,087,147

   
             

5,582,479

   

GOVERNMENT

 

0.7%

                 
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked
Opportunities & Income Fund
       

227,744

     

2,537,068

   

HEALTH/BIOTECH

 

1.0%

                 

Gabelli Healthcare and WellnessRx Trust

       

230,003

     

2,168,928

   

iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF

       

2,608

     

692,111

   

Tekla Life Sciences Investors

       

40,859

     

694,195

   
             

3,555,234

   

HIGH YIELD

 

1.3%

                 

New America High Income Fund

       

128,421

     

1,189,179

   

Pioneer High Income Trust

       

334,459

     

3,414,826

   
             

4,604,005

   

INVESTMENT GRADE

 

1.3%

                 

PIMCO Corporate and Income Opportunity Fund

       

326,583

     

4,673,403

   

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
6



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2016

        Number
of Shares
 

Value

 

MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

 

11.9%

                 

ClearBridge American Energy MLP Fund

       

56,072

   

$

514,741

   

ClearBridge Energy MLP Fund

       

78,989

     

1,229,069

   

ClearBridge Energy MLP Opportunity Fund

       

82,257

     

1,078,389

   

Fiduciary/Claymore MLP Opportunity Fund

       

104,969

     

1,562,988

   

First Trust Energy Income and Growth Fund

       

541,018

     

14,358,618

   

First Trust MLP and Energy Income Fund

       

83,296

     

1,344,397

   

First Trust New Opportunities MLP & Energy Fund

       

230,146

     

2,957,376

   

Kayne Anderson Energy Total Return Fund

       

261,080

     

3,083,355

   

Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company

       

293,608

     

5,748,845

   

Neuberger Berman MLP Income Fund

       

322,569

     

3,028,923

   

Nuveen Energy MLP Total Return Fund

       

82,389

     

1,115,547

   

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.

       

137,962

     

4,234,054

   

Tortoise MLP Fund

       

102,421

     

1,954,193

   
             

42,210,495

   

MULTI-SECTOR

 

14.6%

                 

AllianzGI Convertible & Income Fund

       

570,231

     

3,638,074

   

AllianzGI Convertible & Income Fund II

       

939,794

     

5,366,224

   

PIMCO Dynamic Credit Income Fund

       

625,322

     

12,644,011

   

PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund

       

377,882

     

10,467,331

   

PIMCO Income Opportunity Fund

       

389,556

     

9,022,117

   

PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II

       

1,109,374

     

10,527,959

   
             

51,665,716

   

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
7



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2016

        Number
of Shares
 

Value

 

MUNICIPAL

 

7.5%

                 

BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust

       

36,614

   

$

537,860

   

BlackRock Municipal Income Investment Quality Trust

       

26,558

     

380,045

   

BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund

       

78,601

     

885,833

   

BlackRock MuniHoldings Investment Quality Fund

       

83,866

     

1,189,220

   

BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II

       

13,159

     

177,515

   

BlackRock MuniVest Fund

       

106,813

     

1,026,473

   

BlackRock MuniYield Fund

       

32,148

     

454,573

   

BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund

       

37,324

     

549,409

   

BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II

       

59,626

     

763,809

   

BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III

       

38,194

     

521,348

   

BlackRock Strategic Municipal Trust

       

22,038

     

297,293

   

Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust

       

47,035

     

590,289

   

Invesco Municipal Trust

       

100,865

     

1,236,605

   

Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund

       

141,708

     

1,890,385

   

Nuveen Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3

       

555,006

     

7,847,785

   
Nuveen Enhanced AMT-Free Municipal Credit
Opportunities Fund
       

162,092

     

2,343,850

   

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund

       

128,381

     

1,227,322

   

Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund

       

117,591

     

1,641,570

   

PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II

       

67,070

     

819,595

   

Pioneer Municipal High Income Trust

       

27,493

     

326,342

   

Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust

       

209,923

     

1,484,156

   

Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund

       

30,958

     

461,274

   
             

26,652,551

   

PREFERRED

 

2.4%

                 

Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund

       

9,015

     

179,128

   

John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund

       

22,804

     

356,883

   

Nuveen Preferred & Income Term Fund

       

76,742

     

1,759,694

   

Nuveen Preferred Income Opportunities Fund

       

615,252

     

6,054,080

   
     

     

8,349,785

   

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
8



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2016

        Number
of Shares
 

Value

 

REAL ESTATE

 

2.8%

                 

CBRE Clarion Global Real Estate Income Fund

       

128,977

   

$

941,532

   

Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund

       

180,775

     

970,762

   

Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund

       

578,930

     

6,235,076

   

Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund

       

64,026

     

1,968,800

   
             

10,116,170

   

SENIOR LOAN

 

7.0%

                 

Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund

       

97,658

     

1,472,683

   

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust Fund

       

35,493

     

499,741

   

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust

       

66,872

     

996,393

   

Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust

       

114,766

     

1,690,503

   

Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust

       

193,134

     

1,290,135

   

First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II

       

83,879

     

1,160,047

   

Invesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities Fund

       

206,582

     

2,540,959

   

Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund

       

1,242,383

     

10,995,090

   

Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund

       

101,205

     

1,181,062

   

Nuveen Floating Rate Income Opportunity Fund

       

124,396

     

1,516,387

   

Nuveen Senior Income Fund

       

131,019

     

889,619

   

Pioneer Floating Rate Trust

       

52,777

     

626,463

   
             

24,859,082

   

U.S. GENERAL EQUITY

 

6.8%

                 

Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund

       

59,185

     

4,817,659

   

Gabelli Equity Trust

       

1,705,774

     

9,415,872

   

Source Capital

       

52,799

     

1,896,540

   

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

       

28,557

     

6,383,346

   

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF Trust

       

7,602

     

1,560,767

   
             

24,074,184

   

U.S. HYBRID (GROWTH & INCOME)

 

1.1%

                 

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund

       

174,606

     

1,794,949

   

Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund

       

107,134

     

2,104,112

   
             

3,899,061

   
TOTAL CLOSED-END FUNDS
(Identified cost—$305,299,015)
           

341,966,143

   

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
9



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2016

        Number
of Shares
 

Value

 

SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

   

1.7%

                   

MONEY MARKET FUNDS

                         
State Street Institutional Treasury Money Market Fund,
Premier Class, 0.40%b
       

5,800,000

   

$

5,800,000

   
TOTAL SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
(Identified cost—$5,800,000)
           

5,800,000

   

TOTAL INVESTMENTS (Identified cost—$311,099,015)

   

98.2

%

           

347,766,143

   

OTHER ASSETS IN EXCESS OF LIABILITIES

   

1.8

             

6,527,083

   
NET ASSETS (Equivalent to $13.02 per share based
on 27,209,148 shares of common
stock outstanding)
   

100.0

%

         

$

354,293,226

   

Glossary of Portfolio Abbreviations

ETF  Exchange-Traded Fund

MLP  Master Limited Partnership

SPDR  Standard & Poor's Depositary Receipt

Note: Percentages indicated are based on the net assets of the Fund.

a  Non-income producing security.

b  Rate quoted represents the annualized seven-day yield of the fund.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
10




COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

December 31, 2016

ASSETS:

 

Investments in securities, at value (Identified cost—$311,099,015)

 

$

347,766,143

   

Cash

   

5,965,005

   

Receivable for:

 

Investment securities sold

   

1,785,975

   

Dividends

   

873,477

   

Other assets

   

1,505

   

Total Assets

   

356,392,105

   

LIABILITIES:

 

Payable for:

 

Investment securities purchased

   

1,605,690

   

Investment management fees

   

280,222

   

Dividends declared

   

212,386

   

Directors' fees

   

176

   

Other liabilities

   

405

   

Total Liabilities

   

2,098,879

   

NET ASSETS

 

$

354,293,226

   

NET ASSETS consist of:

 

Paid-in capital

 

$

427,318,133

   

Dividends in excess of net investment income

   

(300,091

)

 

Accumulated net realized loss

   

(109,391,944

)

 
Net unrealized appreciation    

36,667,128

   
   

$

354,293,226

   

NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE:

 

($354,293,226 ÷ 27,209,148 shares outstanding)

 

$

13.02

   

MARKET PRICE PER SHARE

 

$

11.70

   

MARKET PRICE DISCOUNT TO NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE

   

(10.14

)%

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
11



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

For the Year Ended December 31, 2016

Investment Income:

 

Dividend income

 

$

18,672,918

   

Expenses:

 

Investment management fees

   

3,281,820

   

Directors' fees and expenses

   

24,278

   

Miscellaneous

   

3,333

   

Total Expenses

   

3,309,431

   

Reduction of Expenses (See Note 2)

   

(27,611

)

 

Net Expenses

   

3,281,820

   
Net Investment Income (Loss)    

15,391,098

   

Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss):

 

Net realized gain (loss) on:

 
Investments    

6,985,576

   

Foreign currency transactions

   

1,319

   
Net realized gain (loss)    

6,986,895

   
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments    

24,464,868

   
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)    

31,451,763

   

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

 

$

46,842,861

   

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
12



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    For the
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
  For the
Year Ended
December 31, 2015
 

Change in Net Assets:

 

From Operations:

 

Net investment income (loss)

 

$

15,391,098

   

$

16,238,874

   
Net realized gain (loss)    

6,986,895

     

3,843,513

   
Net change in unrealized appreciation
(depreciation)
   

24,464,868

     

(48,441,968

)

 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
resulting from operations
   

46,842,861

     

(28,359,581

)

 

Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders from:

 

Net investment income

   

(24,135,354

)

   

(22,020,667

)

 
Return of capital    

(4,189,369

)

   

(6,276,847

)

 
Total dividends and distributions
to shareholders
   

(28,324,723

)

   

(28,297,514

)

 

Total increase (decrease) in net assets

   

18,518,138

     

(56,657,095

)

 

Net Assets:

 

Beginning of year

   

335,775,088

     

392,432,183

   

End of yeara

 

$

354,293,226

   

$

335,775,088

   

a  Includes dividends in excess of net investment income of $300,091 and $0, respectively.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
13




COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following table includes selected data for a share outstanding throughout each year and other performance information derived from the financial statements. It should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto.

   

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

Per Share Operating Performance:

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net asset value, beginning of year

 

$

12.34

   

$

14.42

   

$

14.06

   

$

13.67

   

$

12.92

   

Income (loss) from investment operations:

 
Net investment income (loss)a    

0.57

     

0.60

     

0.69

     

0.64

     

0.62

   
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)    

1.15

     

(1.64

)

   

0.71

     

0.78

     

1.17

   

Total from investment operations

   

1.72

     

(1.04

)

   

1.40

     

1.42

     

1.79

   
Less dividends and distributions
to shareholders from:
 

Net investment income

   

(0.89

)

   

(0.81

)

   

(1.04

)

   

(0.88

)

   

(1.04

)

 
Return of capital    

(0.15

)

   

(0.23

)

   

     

(0.16

)

   

   
Total dividends and distributions
to shareholders
   

(1.04

)

   

(1.04

)

   

(1.04

)

   

(1.04

)

   

(1.04

)

 

Anti-dilutive effect from the repurchase of shares

   

     

     

     

0.01

     

   
Net increase (decrease) in net
asset value
   

0.68

     

(2.08

)

   

0.36

     

0.39

     

0.75

   

Net asset value, end of year

 

$

13.02

   

$

12.34

   

$

14.42

   

$

14.06

   

$

13.67

   

Market value, end of year

 

$

11.70

   

$

10.96

   

$

13.16

   

$

12.57

   

$

12.42

   

Total net asset value returnb

   

15.31

%

   

–6.57

%

   

10.92

%

   

11.42

%

   

14.66

%

 

Total market value returnb

   

16.67

%

   

–9.04

%

   

13.19

%

   

9.64

%

   

12.45

%

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
14



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS—(Continued)

   

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

Ratios/Supplemental Data:

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net assets, end of year (in millions)

 

$

354.3

   

$

335.8

   

$

392.4

   

$

382.7

   

$

375.1

   
Ratio of expenses to average daily net assets
(before expense reduction)c
   

0.96

%

   

0.96

%

   

0.96

%

   

0.96

%

   

1.02

%d

 
Ratio of expenses to average daily net assets
(net of expense reduction)c
   

0.95

%

   

0.95

%

   

0.95

%

   

0.95

%

   

1.01

%d

 
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average
daily net assets (before expense reduction)c
   

4.45

%

   

4.36

%

   

4.71

%

   

4.53

%

   

4.52

%

 
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average
daily net assets (net of expense reduction)c
   

4.46

%

   

4.37

%

   

4.72

%

   

4.54

%

   

4.53

%

 
Portfolio turnover rate    

36

%

   

19

%

   

33

%

   

41

%

   

51

%

 

a  Calculation based on average shares outstanding.

b  Total net asset value return measures the change in net asset value per share over the period indicated. Total market value return is computed based upon the Fund's NYSE market price per share and excludes the effects of brokerage commissions. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of these calculations, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund's dividend reinvestment plan.

c  Does not include expenses incurred by the closed-end funds in which the Fund invests.

d  Includes extraordinary expenses, approved by the Board of Directors pursuant to the Fund's expense reimbursement agreement, related to the proposal to convert to an open-end fund. Without these expenses, the ratio of expenses to average daily net assets (before expense reduction and net of expense reduction) would have been 0.96% and 0.95%, respectively.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
15




COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund, Inc. (the Fund) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on September 14, 2006 and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Fund's investment objective is to achieve total return.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund is an investment company and, accordingly, follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 946—Investment Companies. The accounting policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Portfolio Valuation: Investments in securities that are listed on the NYSE are valued, except as indicated below, at the last sale price reflected at the close of the NYSE on the business day as of which such value is being determined. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the mean of the closing bid and ask prices on such day or, if no ask price is available, at the bid price.

Securities not listed on the NYSE but listed on other domestic or foreign securities exchanges (including NASDAQ) are valued in a similar manner. Securities traded on more than one securities exchange are valued at the last sale price reflected at the close of the exchange representing the principal market for such securities on the business day as of which such value is being determined. If after the close of a foreign market, but prior to the close of business on the day the securities are being valued, market conditions change significantly, certain non-U.S. equity holdings may be fair valued pursuant to procedures established by the Board of Directors.

Readily marketable securities traded in the over-the-counter market, including listed securities whose primary market is believed by Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (the investment manager) to be over-the-counter, are valued on the basis of prices provided by a third-party pricing service or third-party broker-dealers when such prices are believed by the investment manager, pursuant to delegation by the Board of Directors, to reflect the fair value of such securities.

Short-term debt securities with a maturity date of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Investments in open-end mutual funds are valued at their closing net asset value.

The policies and procedures approved by the Fund's Board of Directors delegate authority to make fair value determinations to the investment manager, subject to the oversight of the Board of Directors. The investment manager has established a valuation committee (Valuation Committee) to administer, implement and oversee the fair valuation process according to the policies and procedures approved annually by the Board of Directors. Among other things, these procedures allow the Fund to


16



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

utilize independent pricing services, quotations from securities and financial instrument dealers and other market sources to determine fair value.

Securities for which market prices are unavailable, or securities for which the investment manager determines that the bid and/or ask price or a counterparty valuation does not reflect market value, will be valued at fair value, as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee, pursuant to procedures approved by the Fund's Board of Directors. Circumstances in which market prices may be unavailable include, but are not limited to, when trading in a security is suspended, the exchange on which the security is traded is subject to an unscheduled close or disruption or material events occur after the close of the exchange on which the security is principally traded. In these circumstances, the Fund determines fair value in a manner that fairly reflects the market value of the security on the valuation date based on consideration of any information or factors it deems appropriate. These may include, but are not limited to, recent transactions in comparable securities, information relating to the specific security and developments in the markets.

Foreign equity fair value pricing procedures utilized by the Fund may cause certain non-U.S. equity holdings to be fair valued on the basis of fair value factors provided by a pricing service to reflect any significant market movements between the time the Fund values such securities and the earlier closing of foreign markets.

The Fund's use of fair value pricing may cause the net asset value of Fund shares to differ from the net asset value that would be calculated using market quotations. Fair value pricing involves subjective judgments and it is possible that the fair value determined for a security may be materially different than the value that could be realized upon the sale of that security.

Fair value is defined as the price that the Fund would expect to receive upon the sale of an investment or expect to pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction with an independent buyer in the principal market or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the investment or liability. The hierarchy of inputs that are used in determining the fair value of the Fund's investments is summarized below.

•  Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

•  Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, credit risk, etc.)

•  Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities may or may not be an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

For movements between the levels within the fair value hierarchy, the Fund has adopted a policy of recognizing the transfer at the end of the period in which the underlying event causing the movement occurred. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 securities as of December 31, 2016.


17



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund's investments carried at value:

  Total   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Investments
(Level 1)
  Other
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Closed-End Funds  

$

341,966,143

   

$

341,966,143

   

$

   

$

   
Short-Term Investments    

5,800,000

     

     

5,800,000

     

   
Total Investmentsa  

$

347,766,143

   

$

341,966,143

   

$

5,800,000

   

$

   

a  Portfolio holdings are disclosed individually on the Schedule of Investments.

Security Transactions and Investment Income: Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Discounts are accreted and premiums are amortized over the life of the respective securities. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date, except for certain dividends on foreign securities, which are recorded as soon as the Fund is informed after the ex-dividend date. Distributions from Closed-End Funds (CEFs) are recorded as ordinary income, net realized capital gain or return of capital based on information reported by the CEFs and management's estimates of such amounts based on historical information. These estimates are adjusted when the actual source of distributions is disclosed by the CEFs and may differ from the estimated amounts.

Foreign Currency Translation: The books and records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon prevailing exchange rates on the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon prevailing exchange rates on the respective dates of such transactions. The Fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.

Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, including gains and losses on forward foreign currency exchange contracts, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund's books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the values of assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, on the date of valuation, resulting from changes in exchange rates. Pursuant to U.S. federal income tax regulations, certain foreign currency gains/losses included in realized and unrealized gains/losses are included in or are a reduction of ordinary income for federal income tax purposes.


18



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders: The Fund makes regular distributions pursuant to the Policy. On September 15, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Fund approved a change in the frequency of dividends distributed to shareholders from quarterly to monthly effective October 1, 2016. Dividends from net investment income, if any, are declared quarterly and paid monthly. Net realized capital gains, unless offset by any available capital loss carryforward, are typically distributed to shareholders at least annually. Dividends and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date and are automatically reinvested in full and fractional shares of the Fund in accordance with the Fund's Reinvestment Plan, unless the shareholder has elected to have them paid in cash.

Dividends from net investment income are subject to recharacterization for tax purposes. Based upon the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016, a portion of the dividends have been reclassified to distributions from return of capital.

Income Taxes: It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interest of the shareholders, by complying with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies, and by distributing substantially all of its taxable earnings to its shareholders. Also, in order to avoid the payment of any federal excise taxes, the Fund will distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net realized gains on a calendar year basis. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal and applicable state income tax returns as well as its tax positions in non-U.S. jurisdictions in which it trades for all open tax years and has concluded that as of December 31, 2016, no additional provisions for income tax are required in the Fund's financial statements. The Fund's tax positions for the tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service, state departments of revenue and by foreign tax authorities.

Note 2. Investment Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates

Investment Management Fees: The investment manager serves as the Fund's investment manager pursuant to an investment management agreement (the investment management agreement). Under the terms of the investment management agreement, the investment manager provides the Fund with day-to-day investment decisions and generally manages the Fund's investments in accordance with the stated policies of the Fund, subject to the supervision of the Board of Directors.

For the services provided to the Fund, the investment manager receives a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at the annual rate of 0.95% of the average daily net assets of the Fund.

The investment manager is also responsible, under the investment management agreement, for the performance of certain administrative functions for the Fund. Additionally, the investment manager pays certain expenses of the Fund, including, but not limited to, administrative and custody fees, transfer agent fees, professional fees, and reports to shareholders.

The investment manager has contractually agreed to reimburse the Fund so that its total annual operating expenses, exclusive of brokerage fees and commissions, taxes and, upon approval of the Board of Directors, extraordinary expenses, do not exceed 0.95% of the Fund's average daily net assets.


19



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

This commitment will remain in place for the life of the Fund. For the year ended December 31, 2016, fees waived and/or expenses reimbursed totaled $27,611.

Directors' and Officers' Fees: Certain directors and officers of the Fund are also directors, officers, and/or employees of the investment manager. The Fund does not pay compensation to directors and officers affiliated with the investment manager.

Note 3. Purchases and Sales of Securities

Purchases and sales of securities, excluding short-term investments, for the year ended December 31, 2016, totaled $122,485,737 and $131,496,443, respectively.

Note 4. Income Tax Information

The tax character of dividends and distributions paid was as follows:

  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Ordinary income

 

$

23,182,129

   

$

20,543,754

   
Tax-exempt income    

953,225

     

1,476,913

   
Return of capital    

4,189,369

     

6,276,847

   

Total dividends and distributions

 

$

28,324,723

   

$

28,297,514

   

As of December 31, 2016, the tax-basis components of accumulated earnings, the federal tax cost and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value of securities held were as follows:

Cost for federal income tax purposes

 

$

319,416,334

   

Gross unrealized appreciation

 

$

41,139,971

   
Gross unrealized depreciation    

(12,790,162

)

 

Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

 

$

28,349,809

   

As of December 31, 2016, the Fund had a net capital loss carryforward of $101,222,674, which may be used to offset future capital gains. These losses are comprised of a short-term capital loss carryover of which $85,886,202 will expire on December 31, 2017 and $15,336,472 will expire on December 31, 2018. In addition, the Fund incurred short-term capital losses of $101,203 and net ordinary losses of $50,839 after October 31, 2016, that it has elected to treat as arising in the following fiscal year.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund utilized net capital loss carryforwards of $8,565,334.


20



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of December 31, 2016, the Fund had temporary book/tax differences primarily attributable to wash sales on portfolio securities and permanent book/tax differences primarily attributable to fund distributions and prior year adjustments. To reflect reclassifications arising from the permanent differences, paid-in capital was charged $8,388,353, accumulated net realized loss was charged $55,812 and dividends in excess of net investment income was credited $8,444,165. Net assets were not affected by this reclassification.

Note 5. Capital Stock

The Fund is authorized to issue 100 million shares of common stock at a par value of $0.001 per share.

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Fund did not issue shares of common stock for the reinvestment of dividends.

On December 6, 2016, the Board of Directors approved the continuation of the delegation of its authority to management to effect repurchases, pursuant to management's discretion and subject to market conditions and investment considerations, of up to 10% of the Fund's common shares outstanding (Shares Repurchase Program) from January 1, 2017, through the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Fund did not effect any repurchases.

Note 6. Other Risks

Common Stock Risk: While common stocks have historically generated higher average returns than fixed income securities over the long-term, common stock has also experienced significantly more volatility in those returns, although under certain market conditions, fixed-income investments may have comparable or greater price volatility. An adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value of common stock held by the Fund. Also, the price of common stock is sensitive to general movements in the stock market. A drop in the stock market may depress the price of common stock held by the Fund.

Risks of Investing in Other Closed-End Investment Companies: Since the Fund concentrates its assets in closed-end management investment companies, risks of investing in the Fund include the risks associated with the purchased closed-end investment companies' portfolio securities, and a shareholder in the Fund will bear not only his or her proportionate share of the Fund's expenses, but also indirectly the expenses of the purchased closed-end investment companies ("Portfolio Funds"). Shareholders will therefore be subject to duplicative expenses to the extent the Fund invests in other investment companies. Risks associated with investments in closed-end end funds generally include market risk, leverage risk, risk of market price discount from net asset value, risk of anti-takeover provisions and non-diversification.

Sector Concentration Risk: Some Portfolio Funds invest substantially, or even exclusively, in one sector or industry group and therefore carry risk of the particular sector or industry group. To the extent


21



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

a Portfolio Fund focuses its investments in a specific sector, such as real estate, energy or utilities, the Portfolio Fund will be susceptible to adverse conditions and economic or regulatory occurrences affecting the sector or industry group, which tends to increase volatility and result in higher risk.

Covered Call Writing Risk: The Fund may invest in Portfolio Funds that engage in a strategy known as "covered call option writing," which is designed to produce income from option premiums and offset a portion of a market decline in the underlying security. The writer (seller) of a covered call option forgoes, during the option's life, the opportunity to profit from increases in the market value of the security covering the call option above the sum of the premium and the strike price of the call, but has retained the risk of loss should the price of the underlying security decline. The writer of an option has no control over the time when it may be required to fulfill its obligation as a writer of the option. Once an option writer has received an exercise notice, it cannot effect a closing purchase transaction in order to terminate its obligation under the option and must deliver the underlying security at the exercise price.

Municipal Bond Risk: The Fund may invest in Portfolio Funds that invest in municipal bonds. Municipal bonds are debt obligations issued by states or by political subdivisions or authorities of states. Municipal bonds are typically designated as general obligation bonds, which are general obligations of a governmental entity that are backed by the taxing power of such entity, or revenue bonds, which are payable from the income of a specific project or authority and are not supported by the issuer's power to levy taxes. Municipal bonds are long-term fixed rate debt obligations that generally decline in value with increases in interest rates, when an issuer's financial condition worsens or when the rating on a bond is decreased. Many municipal bonds may be called or redeemed prior to their stated maturity. Lower quality revenue bonds and other credit-sensitive municipal securities carry higher risks of default than general obligation bonds.

Master Limited Partnership Risk: The Fund may invest in Portfolio Funds that invest in master limited partnerships (MLPs). An investment in MLP units involves some risks that differ from an investment in the common stock of a corporation. Holders of MLP units have limited control on matters affecting the partnership. Investing in MLPs involves certain risks related to investing in the underlying assets of the MLPs and risks associated with pooled investment vehicles. MLPs holding credit-related investments are subject to interest rate risk and the risk of default on payment obligations by debt issuers. MLPs that concentrate in a particular industry or a particular geographic region are subject to risks associated with such industry or region. The benefit derived from the Fund's investment in MLPs is largely dependent on the MLPs being treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. Weakening energy market fundamentals may increase counterparty risk and impact MLP profitability. Specifically, energy companies suffering financial distress may be able to abrogate contracts with MLPs, decreasing or eliminating sources of revenue.

Senior Loans Risk: The Fund may invest in Portfolio Funds that invest in senior loans. The risks associated with senior loans are similar to the risks of junk bonds, although senior loans are typically senior and secured, whereas junk bonds are often subordinated and unsecured. Investments in senior loans are typically below investment grade and are considered speculative because of the credit risk of their issuers. Such companies are more likely to default on their payments of interest and principal owed, and such defaults could reduce a Portfolio Fund's net asset value and income distributions. An economic downturn generally leads to a higher non-payment rate, and a senior loan may lose significant


22



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

value before a default occurs. There is no assurance that the liquidation of the collateral would satisfy the claims of the borrower's obligations in the event of the nonpayment of scheduled interest or principal, or that the collateral could be readily liquidated. Economic and other events (whether real or perceived) can reduce the demand for certain senior loans or senior loans generally, which may reduce market prices. Senior loans and other debt securities are also subject to the risk of price declines and to increases in prevailing interest rates, although floating-rate debt instruments such as senior loans in which certain Portfolio Funds may be expected to invest are substantially less exposed to this risk than fixed-rate debt instruments.

Preferred Securities Risk: The Fund may invest in Portfolio Funds that invest in preferred securities. Preferred securities are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that a security will decline in price, or the issuer of the security will fail to make dividend, interest or principal payments when due, because the issuer experiences a decline in its financial status. Preferred securities are also subject to interest rate risk and may decline in value because of changes in market interest rates. Portfolio Funds may be subject to a greater risk of rising interest rates than would normally be the case in an environment of low interest rates and the effect of potential government fiscal policy initiatives and resulting market reaction to those initiatives. In addition, an issuer may be permitted to defer or omit distributions. Preferred securities are also generally subordinated to bonds and other debt instruments in a company's capital structure. During periods of declining interest rates, an issuer may be able to exercise an option to redeem (call) its issue at par earlier than scheduled, and the Portfolio Fund may be forced to reinvest in lower yielding securities. Certain preferred securities may be substantially less liquid than many other securities, such as common stocks. Generally, preferred security holders have no voting rights with respect to the issuing company unless certain events occur. Certain preferred securities may give the issuers special redemption rights allowing the securities to be redeemed prior to a specified date if certain events occur, such as changes to tax or securities laws.

Leverage Risk: Portfolio Funds may employ the use of leverage. The use of leverage is a speculative technique and there are special risks and costs associated with leverage. The net asset value of the Portfolio Fund's shares may be reduced by the issuance and ongoing costs of leverage. So long as the Portfolio Fund is able to invest in securities that produce an investment yield that is greater than the total cost of leverage, the leverage strategy will produce higher current net investment income for the shareholders, including the Fund. On the other hand, to the extent that the total cost of leverage exceeds the incremental income gained from employing such leverage, shareholders, including the Fund, would realize lower net investment income. In addition to the impact on net income, the use of leverage will have an effect of magnifying capital appreciation or depreciation for shareholders. Specifically, in an up market, leverage will typically generate greater capital appreciation than if the Portfolio Fund were not employing leverage. Conversely, in down markets, the use of leverage will generally result in greater capital depreciation than if the Portfolio Fund had been unlevered. To the extent that the Portfolio Fund is required or elects to reduce its leverage, the Portfolio Fund may need to liquidate investments, including under adverse economic conditions which may result in capital losses potentially reducing returns to shareholders. There can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful during any period in which it is employed.


23



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Regulatory Risk: The U.S. government has proposed and adopted multiple regulations that could have a long-lasting impact on the Fund and on the mutual fund industry in general. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) proposed rules governing the use of derivatives by registered investment companies, the Department of Labor's (DOL) final rule on conflicts of interest on fiduciary investment advice, as well as the SEC's final rules and amendments to modernize the reporting and disclosure (Modernization) could, among other things, restrict and/or increase the cost of the Fund's ability to engage in transactions and/or increase overall expenses of the Fund. In addition, Congress, various exchanges and regulatory and self-regulatory authorities domestic and foreign have undertaken reviews of options and futures trading in light of market volatility. Among the actions that have been taken or proposed to be taken are new limits and reporting requirements for speculative positions, new or more stringent daily price fluctuation limits for futures and options transactions, and increased margin requirements for various types of futures transactions. While the full extent of all of these regulations is still unclear, these regulations and actions may adversely affect the instruments in which the Fund invests and its ability to execute its investment strategy.

Note 7. Other

In the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund's maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on claims that may be made against the Fund in the future and, therefore, cannot be estimated; however, based on experience, the risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.

Note 8. New Accounting Guidance

In October 2016, the SEC issued a new rule, Investment Company Reporting Modernization, which, among other provisions, amends Regulation S-X to require standardized, enhanced disclosures, particularly related to derivatives, in investment company financial statements. Compliance with the rule is effective for financial statements filed with the SEC on or after August 1, 2017.

Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Fund's financial statements and does not expect any impact to the Fund's net assets or results of operations.

Note 9. Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated events and transactions occurring after December 31, 2016 through the date that the financial statements were issued, and has determined that no additional disclosure in the financial statements is required.


24




COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of the
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund, Inc.

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities as of December 31, 2016 by correspondence with the custodian, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
February 27, 2017


25



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS

(Periods ended December 31, 2016) (Unaudited)

Based on Net Asset Value

 

Based on Market Value

 
One Year  

Five Years

 

Ten Years

  Since Inception
(11/24/06)
 

One Year

 

Five Years

 

Ten Years

  Since Inception
(11/24/06)
 
  15.31

%

   

8.83

%

   

4.72

%

   

4.87

%

   

16.67

%

   

8.17

%

   

3.17

%

   

3.44

%

 

The performance data quoted represent past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The investment return will vary and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate and shares, if sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Current total returns of the Fund can be obtained by visiting our website at cohenandsteers.com. Fund performance figures reflect fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, without which the performance would have been lower. The Fund's returns assume the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at prices obtained under the Fund's dividend reinvestment plan.

TAX INFORMATION—2016 (Unaudited)

Pursuant to the Jobs and Growth Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, the Fund designates qualified dividend income of $5,688,750. The Fund designates tax-exempt income distributions of $953,225. Additionally, 16.33% of the ordinary dividends qualified for the dividends received deduction available to corporations.

REINVESTMENT PLAN

The Fund has a dividend reinvestment plan commonly referred to as an "opt-out" plan (the Plan). Each common shareholder who participates in the Plan will have all distributions of dividends and capital gains (Dividends) automatically reinvested in additional common shares by Computershare as agent (the Plan Agent). Shareholders who elect not to participate in the Plan will receive all Dividends in cash paid by check mailed directly to the shareholder of record (or if the shares are held in street or other nominee name, then to the nominee) by the Plan Agent, as dividend disbursing agent. Shareholders whose common shares are held in the name of a broker or nominee should contact the broker or nominee to determine whether and how they may participate in the Plan.

The Plan Agent serves as agent for the shareholders in administering the Plan. After the Fund declares a Dividend, the Plan Agent will, as agent for the shareholders, either: (i) receive the cash payment and use it to buy common shares in the open market, on the NYSE or elsewhere, for the participants' accounts or (ii) distribute newly issued common shares of the Fund on behalf of the participants.

The Plan Agent will receive cash from the Fund with which to buy common shares in the open market if, on the Dividend payment date, the net asset value (NAV) per share exceeds the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions on that date. The Plan Agent will receive the Dividend in newly issued common shares of the Fund if, on the Dividend payment date, the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions equals or exceeds the NAV per share of the Fund on that date. The number of shares to be issued will be computed at a per share rate equal to the greater of (i) the NAV or (ii) 95% of the closing market price per share on the payment date.

If the market price per share is less than the NAV on a Dividend payment date, the Plan Agent will have until the last business day before the next ex-dividend date for the common stock, but in no event


26



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

more than 30 days after the Dividend payment date (as the case may be, the Purchase Period), to invest the Dividend amount in shares acquired in open market purchases. If at the close of business on any day during the Purchase Period on which NAV is calculated the NAV equals or is less than the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions, the Plan Agent will cease making open market purchases and the uninvested portion of such Dividends shall be filled through the issuance of new shares of common stock from the Fund at the price set forth in the immediately preceding paragraph.

Participants in the Plan may withdraw from the Plan upon notice to the Plan Agent. Such withdrawal will be effective immediately if received not less than ten days prior to a Dividend record date; otherwise, it will be effective for all subsequent Dividends. If any participant elects to have the Plan Agent sell all or part of his or her shares and remit the proceeds, the Plan Agent is authorized to deduct a $15.00 fee plus $0.10 per share brokerage commissions.

The Plan Agent's fees for the handling of reinvestment of Dividends will be paid by the Fund. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Plan Agent's open market purchases in connection with the reinvestment of Dividends. The automatic reinvestment of Dividends will not relieve participants of any income tax that may be payable or required to be withheld on such Dividends.

The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan. All correspondence concerning the Plan should be directed to the Plan Agent at 800-432-8224.

OTHER INFORMATION

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-330-7348, (ii) on our website at cohenandsteers.com or (iii) on the Securities and Exchange Commission's (the SEC) website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the Fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available by August 31 of each year (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-330-7348 or (ii) on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.

The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund's Forms N-Q are available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-330-7348 or (ii) on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.

Please note that distributions paid by the Fund to shareholders are subject to recharacterization for tax purposes and are taxable up to the amount of the Fund's investment company taxable income and net realized gains. Distributions in excess of the Fund's net investment company taxable income and realized gains are a return of capital distributed from the Fund's assets. To the extent this occurs, the Fund's shareholders of record will be notified of the estimated amount of capital returned to shareholders for each such distribution and this information will also be available at cohenandsteers.com. The final tax treatment of all distributions is reported to shareholders on their 1099-DIV forms, which are mailed after the close of each calendar year. Distributions of capital decrease the Fund's total assets and, therefore, could have the effect of increasing the Fund's expense ratio. In addition, in order to make these distributions, the Fund may have to sell portfolio securities at a less than opportune time.

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Rule 23c-1 under the 1940 Act that the Fund may purchase, from time to time, shares of its common stock in the open market.


27



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND

The business and affairs of the Fund are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors approves all significant agreements between the Fund and persons or companies furnishing services to it, including the Fund's agreements with its investment manager, administrator, co-administrator, custodian and transfer agent. The management of the Fund's day-to-day operations is delegated to its officers, the investment manager, administrator and co-administrator, subject always to the investment objective and policies of the Fund and to the general supervision of the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors and officers of the Fund and their principal occupations during at least the past five years are set forth below. The statement of additional information (SAI) includes additional information about fund directors and is available, without charge, upon request by calling 800-330-7348.

Name, Address and
Year of Birth1
  Position(s) Held
With Fund
  Term of
Office2
  Principal Occupation
During At Least
The Past 5 Years
(Including Other
Directorships Held)
  Number of
Funds Within
Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Director
(Including
the Fund)
  Length
of Time
Served3
 

Interested Directors4

                     
Robert H. Steers
1953
 

Director, Chairman

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

Chief Executive Officer of Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (CSCM) and its parent, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) since 2014. Prior to that, Co-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of CSCM since 2003 and CNS since 2004. Prior to that, Chairman of CSCM; Vice President of Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC.

 

22

 

Since 1991

 
Joseph M. Harvey
1963
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

President and Chief Investment Officer of CSCM (since 2003) and President of CNS (since 2004). Prior to that, Senior Vice President and Director of Investment Research of CSCM.

 

22

 

Since 2014

 

  (table continued on next page)


28



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

(table continued from previous page)

Name, Address and
Year of Birth1
  Position(s) Held
With Fund
  Term of
Office2
  Principal Occupation
During At Least
The Past 5 Years
(Including Other
Directorships Held)
  Number of
Funds Within
Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Director
(Including
the Fund)
  Length
of Time
Served3
 

Disinterested Directors

                     
Michael G. Clark
1965
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

From 2006 to 2011, President and Chief Executive Officer of DWS Funds and Managing Director of Deutsche Asset Management.

 

22

 

Since 2011

 
Bonnie Cohen
1942
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

Consultant. Board Member, DC Public Library Foundation since 2012, President since 2014; Board member, Telluride Mountain Film Festival since 2010; Trustee, H. Rubenstein Foundation since 1996; Trustee, District of Columbia Public Libraries from 2004 to 2014.

 

22

 

Since 2001

 
George Grossman
1953
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

Attorney-at-law.

 

22

 

Since 1993

 

  (table continued on next page)


29



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

(table continued from previous page)

Name, Address and
Year of Birth1
  Position(s) Held
With Fund
  Term of
Office2
  Principal Occupation
During At Least
The Past 5 Years
(Including Other
Directorships Held)
  Number of
Funds Within
Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Director
(Including
the Fund)
  Length
of Time
Served3
 
Dean Junkans
1959
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

C.F.A.; Adjunct Professor and Executive-In-Residence, Bethel University since 2015; Chief Investment Officer at Wells Fargo Private Bank from 2004 to 2014 and Chief Investment Officer of the Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement group at Wells Fargo & Company from 2011 to 2014; Former member and Chair, Claritas Advisory Committee at the CFA Institute from 2013 to 2015; Board Member and Investment Committee member, Bethel University Foundation since 2010; Formerly, Corporate Executive Board Member of the National Chief Investment Officers Circle, 2010 to 2015; Formerly, Member of the Board of Governors of the University of Wisconsin Foundation, River Falls, 1996 to 2004; U.S. Army Veteran, Gulf War.

 

22

 

Since 2015

 
Richard E. Kroon
1942
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

Former member of Investment Committee, Monmouth University since 2004 to 2016; Formerly, Director, Retired Chairman and Managing Partner of Sprout Group venture capital funds, then an affiliate of Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette Securities Corporation from 1981 to 2001; Formerly, Director of the National Venture Capital Association from 1997 to 2000, and Chairman for the year 2000.

 

22

 

Since 2004

 

  (table continued on next page)


30



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

(table continued from previous page)

Name, Address and
Year of Birth1
  Position(s) Held
With Fund
  Term of
Office2
  Principal Occupation
During At Least
The Past 5 Years
(Including Other
Directorships Held)
  Number of
Funds Within
Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Director
(Including
the Fund)
  Length
of Time
Served3
 
Gerald J. Maginnis
1955
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

Philadelphia Office Managing Partner, KPMG LLP from 2006 to 2015; Partner in Charge, KPMG Pennsylvania Audit Practice from 2002 to 2008; President, Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants (PICPA) from 2014 to 2015; member, PICPA Board of Directors from June 2012 to June 2016; member, Council of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA); member, Board of Trustees of AICPA Foundation.

 

22

 

Since 2015

 
Jane F. Magpiong
1960
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

President, Untap Potential since 2013; Board Member, Crespi High School since 2014; Senior Managing Director, TIAA-CREF, from 2011 to 2013; National Head of Wealth Management, TIAA-CREF, from 2008 to 2011; and prior to that, President, Bank of America Private Bank from 2005 to 2008.

 

22

 

Since 2015

 
Richard J. Norman
1943
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

Private Investor. Member, Montgomery County, Maryland Department of Corrections Volunteer Corps. since 2010; Liaison for Business Leadership, Salvation Army World Service Organization (SAWSO) since 2010; Advisory Board Member, The Salvation Army since 1985; Prior thereto, Investment Representative of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter from 1966 to 2000.

 

22

 

Since 2001

 

  (table continued on next page)


31



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

(table continued from previous page)

Name, Address and
Year of Birth1
  Position(s) Held
With Fund
  Term of
Office2
  Principal Occupation
During At Least
The Past 5 Years
(Including Other
Directorships Held)
  Number of
Funds Within
Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Director
(Including
the Fund)
  Length
of Time
Served3
 
Frank K. Ross
1943
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

Visiting Professor of Accounting and Director of the Center for Accounting Education at Howard University School of Business since 2004; Board member and member of Audit Committee (Chairman from 2007 to 2012) and Human Resources and Compensation Committee Member, Pepco Holdings, Inc. (electric utility) from 2004 to 2014; Formerly, Mid-Atlantic Area Managing Partner for Assurance Services at KPMG LLP and Managing Partner of its Washington, DC offices from 1995 to 2003.

 

22

 

Since 2004

 
C. Edward Ward, Jr.
1946
 

Director

 

Until Next Election of Directors

 

Member of The Board of Trustees of Manhattan College, Riverdale, New York from 2004 to 2014; Formerly, Director of closed-end fund management for the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE) where he worked from 1979 to 2004.

 

22

 

Since 2004

 

1  The address for each director is 280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

2  On March 12, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted a mandatory retirement policy stating a Director must retire from the Board on December 31st of the year in which he or she turns 75 years of age.

3  The length of time served represents the year in which the Director was first elected or appointed to any fund in the Cohen & Steers fund complex.

4  "Interested person", as defined in the 1940 Act, of the Fund because of affiliation with CSCM (Interested Directors).


32



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

The officers of the Fund (other than Messrs. Steers and Harvey, whose biographies are provided above), their address, their year of birth and their principal occupations for at least the past five years are set forth below.

Name, Address and
Year of Birth1
  Position(s) Held
With Fund
 

Principal Occupation During At Least the Past 5 Years

  Length
of Time
Served2
 
Adam M. Derechin
1964
 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Chief Operating Officer of CSCM since 2003 and CNS since 2004.

 

Since 2005

 
Douglas R. Bond
1959
 

Vice President

 

Executive Vice President of CSCM since 2004.

 

Since 2007

 
Yigal D. Jhirad
1965
 

Vice President

 

Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2007.

 

Since 2007

 
Tina M. Payne
1974
 

Secretary and Chief Legal Officer

 

Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel of CSCM since 2010.

 

Since 2007

 
James Giallanza
1966
 

Chief Financial Officer

 

Executive Vice President of CSCM since 2014. Prior to that, Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2006.

 

Since 2006

 
Albert Laskaj
1977
 

Treasurer

 

Vice President of CSCM since 2015. Prior to that, Director of Legg Mason & Co. since 2013. Vice President of Legg Mason from 2008 to 2013 and Treasurer of certain mutual funds since 2010.

 

Since 2015

 
Lisa D. Phelan
1968
 

Chief Compliance Officer

 

Executive Vice President of CSCM since 2015. Prior to that, Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2008. Chief Compliance Officer of CSCM, the Cohen & Steers funds, Cohen & Steers Asia Limited and CSSL since 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

Since 2006

 

1  The address of each officer is 280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

2  Officers serve one-year terms. The length of time served represents the year in which the officer was first elected as an officer of any fund in the Cohen & Steers fund complex. All of the officers listed above are officers of one or more of the other funds in the complex.


33




COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

Cohen & Steers Privacy Policy

Facts

 

What Does Cohen & Steers Do With Your Personal Information?

 

Why?

 

Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do.

 

What?

  The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include:
• Social Security number and account balances
• Transaction history and account transactions
• Purchase history and wire transfer instructions
 

How?

 

All financial companies need to share customers' personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers' personal information; the reasons Cohen & Steers chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing.

 

 

Reasons we can share your personal information

  Does Cohen & Steers
share?
  Can you limit this
sharing?
 
For our everyday business purposes—
such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or reports to credit bureaus
 

Yes

 

No

 
For our marketing purposes—
to offer our products and services to you
 

Yes

 

No

 

For joint marketing with other financial companies—

 

No

 

We don't share

 
For our affiliates' everyday business purposes—
information about your transactions and experiences
 

No

 

We don't share

 
For our affiliates' everyday business purposes—
information about your creditworthiness
 

No

 

We don't share

 

For our affiliates to market to you—

 

No

 

We don't share

 

For non-affiliates to market to you—

 

No

 

We don't share

 

Questions?  Call 800.330.7348


34



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

Cohen & Steers Privacy Policy—(Continued)

Who we are

     

Who is providing this notice?

 

Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc., Cohen & Steers Asia Limited, Cohen & Steers Japan, LLC, Cohen & Steers UK Limited, Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC, Cohen & Steers Private Funds and Cohen & Steers Open and Closed-End Funds (collectively, Cohen & Steers).

 

What we do

     

How does Cohen & Steers protect my personal information?

 

To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings. We restrict access to your information to those employees who need it to perform their jobs, and also require companies that provide services on our behalf to protect your information.

 

How does Cohen & Steers collect my personal information?

  We collect your personal information, for example, when you:
• Open an account or buy securities from us
• Provide account information or give us your contact information
• Make deposits or withdrawals from your account
We also collect your personal information from other companies.
 

Why can't I limit all sharing?

  Federal law gives you the right to limit only:
• sharing for affiliates' everyday business purposes—information about your creditworthiness
• affiliates from using your information to market to you
• sharing for non-affiliates to market to you
State law and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing.
 

Definitions

     

Affiliates

  Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.
• Cohen & Steers does not share with affiliates.
 

Non-affiliates

  Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.
• Cohen & Steers does not share with non-affiliates.
 

Joint marketing

  A formal agreement between non-affiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you.
• Cohen & Steers does not jointly market.
 


35



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

Cohen & Steers Investment Solutions

COHEN & STEERS REAL ASSETS FUND

  •  Designed for investors seeking total return and the maximization of real returns during inflationary environments by investing primarily in real assets

  •  Symbols: RAPAX, RAPCX, RAPIX, RAPRX, RAPZX

COHEN & STEERS
INSTITUTIONAL GLOBAL REALTY SHARES

  •  Designed for institutional investors seeking total return, investing primarily in global real estate securities

  •  Symbol: GRSIX

COHEN & STEERS GLOBAL REALTY SHARES

  •  Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in global real estate equity securities

  •  Symbols: CSFAX, CSFCX, CSSPX, GRSRX, CSFZX

COHEN & STEERS REALTY SHARES

  •  Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in U.S. real estate securities

  •  Symbol: CSRSX

COHEN & STEERS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES FUND

  •  Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in U.S. real estate securities

  •  Symbols: CSEIX, CSCIX, CSDIX, CIRRX, CSZIX

COHEN & STEERS INSTITUTIONAL REALTY SHARES

  •  Designed for institutional investors seeking total return, investing primarily in U.S. real estate securities

  •  Symbol: CSRIX

COHEN & STEERS INTERNATIONAL REALTY FUND

  •  Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in international (non-U.S.) real estate securities

  •  Symbols: IRFAX, IRFCX, IRFIX, IRFRX, IRFZX

COHEN & STEERS
ACTIVE COMMODITIES STRATEGY FUND

  •  Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of exchange-traded commodity future contracts and other commodity-related derivative instruments

  •  Symbols: CDFAX, CDFCX, CDFIX, CDFRX, CDFZX

COHEN & STEERS GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND

  •  Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in global infrastructure securities

  •  Symbols: CSUAX, CSUCX, CSUIX, CSURX, CSUZX

COHEN & STEERS
MLP & ENERGY OPPORTUNITY FUND

  •  Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in midstream energy master limited partnership (MLP) units and related stocks

  •  Symbols: MLOAX, MLOCX, MLOIX, MLORX, MLOZX

COHEN & STEERS
LOW DURATION PREFERRED AND INCOME FUND

  •  Designed for investors seeking high current income and capital preservation by investing in low-duration preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies

  •  Symbols: LPXAX, LPXCX, LPXIX, LPXRX, LPXZX

COHEN & STEERS
PREFERRED SECURITIES AND INCOME FUND

  •  Designed for investors seeking total return (high current income and capital appreciation), investing primarily in preferred and debt securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies

  •  Symbols: CPXAX, CPXCX, CPXIX, CPRRX, CPXZX

COHEN & STEERS DIVIDEND VALUE FUND

  •  Designed for investors seeking long-term growth of income and capital appreciation, investing primarily in dividend paying common stocks and preferred stocks

  •  Symbols: DVFAX, DVFCX, DVFIX, DVFRX, DVFZX

Distributed by Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC.

COHEN & STEERS GLOBAL REALTY MAJORS ETF

  •  Designed for investors who seek a relatively low-cost passive approach for investing in a portfolio of global real estate equity securities of companies in a specified index

  •  Symbol: GRI

Distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc.

ISHARES COHEN & STEERS
REALTY MAJORS INDEX FUND

  •  Designed for investors who seek a relatively low-cost passive approach for investing in a portfolio of U.S. real estate equity securities of companies in a specified index

  •  Symbol: ICF

Distributed by SEI Investments Distribution Co.

Please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the fund carefully before investing. A summary prospectus and prospectus containing this and other information can be obtained by calling 800-330-7348 or by visiting cohenandsteers.com. Please read the summary prospectus and prospectus carefully before investing.


36



COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

Robert H. Steers
Director and Chairman

Joseph M. Harvey
Director and Vice President

Michael G. Clark
Director

Bonnie Cohen
Director

George Grossman
Director

Dean Junkans
Director

Richard E. Kroon
Director

Gerald J. Maginnis
Director

Jane F. Magpiong
Director

Richard J. Norman
Director

Frank K. Ross
Director

C. Edward Ward, Jr.
Director

Adam M. Derechin
President and Chief Executive Officer

Douglas R. Bond
Vice President

Yigal D. Jhirad
Vice President

Tina M. Payne
Secretary and Chief Legal Officer

James Giallanza
Chief Financial Officer

Albert Laskaj
Treasurer

Lisa D. Phelan
Chief Compliance Officer

KEY INFORMATION

Investment Manager

Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc.
280 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
(212) 832-3232

Co-administrator and Custodian

State Street Bank and Trust Company
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111

Transfer Agent

Computershare
480 Washington Boulevard
Jersey City, NJ 07310
(866) 227-0757

Legal Counsel

Ropes & Gray LLP
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

New York Stock Exchange Symbol: FOF

Website: cohenandsteers.com

This report is for shareholder information. This is not a prospectus intended for use in the purchase or sale of Fund shares. Performance data quoted represent past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results and your investment may be worth more or less at the time you sell your shares.


37




COHEN & STEERS

CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND

280 PARK AVENUE

NEW YORK, NY 10017

eDelivery NOW AVAILABLE

Stop traditional mail delivery; receive your shareholder reports and prospectus online.

Sign up at cohenandsteers.com

FOFAR

Annual Report December 31, 2016

Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund




 

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

 

The Registrant has adopted an Amended and Restated Code of Ethics that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.  The Code of Ethics was in effect during the reporting period.  The Registrant amended the Code of Ethics during the reporting period to expand on how covered officers should handle conflicts of interest.  The Registrant has not granted any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Ethics as described in Form N-CSR during the reporting period.  A current copy of the Code of Ethics is available on the Registrant’s website at https://www.cohenandsteers.com/assets/content/uploads/Code_of_Ethics_for_Principal_Executive_and_Principal_Financial_ Officers_of_the_Funds.pdf.  Upon request, a copy of the Code of Ethics can be obtained free of charge by calling 800-330-7348 or writing to the Secretary of the Registrant, 280 Park Avenue, 10th floor, New York, NY 10017.

 

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

 

The registrant’s board has determined that Michael G. Clark, Gerald J. Maginnis and Frank K. Ross, each a member of the board’s audit committee, are each an “audit committee financial expert.” Mr. Clark, Mr. Maginnis and Mr. Ross are each “independent,” as such term is defined in Form N-CSR.

 

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

 

(a) – (d) Aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the registrant’s principal accountant were as follows:

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Audit Fees

 

$

49,800

 

$

49,800

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

Tax Fees

 

$

6,600

 

$

6,600

 

All Other Fees

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

 

Tax fees were billed in connection with tax compliance services, including the preparation and review of federal and state tax returns and the computation of corporate and franchise tax amounts.

 

(e)(1)                   The registrant’s audit committee is required to pre-approve audit and non-audit services performed for the registrant by the principal accountant. The audit committee also is required to pre-approve non-audit services performed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant’s investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrant’s investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant, if the engagement for services relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant.

 



 

The audit committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members who are independent members of the board of directors of the registrant. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its next scheduled meeting.  The audit committee may not delegate its responsibility to pre-approve services to be performed by the registrant’s principal accountant to the investment advisor.

 

(e)(2)                   No services included in (b) – (d) above were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

 

(f)                                   Not applicable.

 

(g)                                  For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant and for non-audit services rendered to the registrant’s investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrant’s investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant were:

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Registrant

 

$

6,600

 

$

6,600

 

Investment Advisor

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

 

(h)                                 The registrant’s audit committee considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrant’s investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not required to be pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X was compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

 

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

 

The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  The members of the committee are Frank K. Ross (chairman), Michael G. Clark, Bonnie Cohen, George Grossman and Gerald J. Maginnis.

 

Item 6. Schedule of Investments.

 

Included in Item 1 above.

 



 

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

 

The registrant has delegated voting of proxies in respect of portfolio holdings to Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc., in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth below.

 

COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

STATEMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING THE VOTING OF SECURITIES

 

The registrant has delegated voting of proxies in respect of portfolio holdings to Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc., in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth below.

 

COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

STATEMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING THE VOTING OF SECURITIES

 

This statement sets forth the policies and procedures that Cohen & Steers, Inc. and its affiliated advisors (“Cohen & Steers”, “we” or “us”) follow in exercising voting rights with respect to securities held in its client portfolios.  All proxy-voting rights that are exercised by Cohen & Steers shall be subject to this Statement of Policy and Procedures.

 

A.                                    General Proxy Voting Guidelines

 

Objectives

 

Voting rights are an important component of corporate governance.  Cohen & Steers has three overall objectives in exercising voting rights:

 

·                  Responsibility. Cohen & Steers shall seek to ensure that there is an effective means in place to hold companies accountable for their actions. While management must be accountable to its board, the board must be accountable to a company’s shareholders.  Although accountability can be promoted in a variety of ways, protecting shareholder voting rights may be among our most important tools.

 

·                  Rationalizing Management and Shareholder Concerns.  Cohen & Steers seeks to ensure that the interests of a company’s management and board are aligned with those of the company’s shareholders.  In this respect, compensation must be structured to reward the creation of shareholder value.

 

·                  Shareholder Communication.  Since companies are owned by their shareholders, Cohen & Steers seeks to ensure that management effectively communicates with its owners about the company’s business operations and financial performance. It is only with effective communication that shareholders will be able to assess the performance of management and to make informed decisions on when to buy, sell or hold a company’s securities.

 



 

General Principles

 

In exercising voting rights, Cohen & Steers shall conduct itself in accordance with the general principles set forth below.

 

·                  The ability to exercise a voting right with respect to a security is a valuable right and, therefore, must be viewed as part of the asset itself.

 

·                  In exercising voting rights, Cohen & Steers shall engage in a careful evaluation of issues that may materially affect the rights of shareholders and the value of the security.

 

·                  Consistent with general fiduciary principles, the exercise of voting rights shall always be conducted with reasonable care, prudence and diligence.

 

·                  In exercising voting rights on behalf of clients, Cohen & Steers shall conduct itself in the same manner as if Cohen & Steers were the constructive owner of the securities.

 

·                  To the extent reasonably possible, Cohen & Steers shall participate in each shareholder voting opportunity.

 

·                  Voting rights shall not automatically be exercised in favor of management-supported proposals.

 

·                  Cohen & Steers, and its officers and employees, shall never accept any item of value in consideration of a favorable proxy voting decision.

 

General Guidelines

 

Set forth below are general guidelines that Cohen & Steers shall follow in exercising proxy voting rights:

 

·                  Prudence.  In making a proxy voting decision, Cohen & Steers shall give appropriate consideration to all relevant facts and circumstances, including the value of the securities to be voted and the likely effect any vote may have on that value.  Since voting rights must be exercised on the basis of an informed judgment, investigation shall be a critical initial step.

·                  Third Party Views.  While Cohen & Steers may consider the views of third parties, Cohen & Steers shall never base a proxy voting decision solely on the opinion of a third party.  Rather, decisions shall be based on a reasonable and good faith determination as to how best to maximize shareholder value.

·                  Shareholder Value.  Just as the decision whether to purchase or sell a security is a matter of judgment, determining whether a specific proxy resolution will increase the market value of a security is a matter of judgment as to which informed parties may differ.  In determining how a proxy vote may affect the economic value of a security, Cohen & Steers shall consider both short-term and long-term views about a company’s business and prospects, especially in light of our projected holding period on the stock (e.g., Cohen & Steers may discount long-term views on a short-term holding).

 



 

Specific Guidelines

 

Uncontested Director Elections

 

Votes on director nominees should be made on a case-by-case basis using a “mosaic” approach, where all factors are considered in director elections and where no single issue is deemed to be determinative.  For example, a nominee’s experience and business judgment may be critical to the long-term success of the portfolio company, notwithstanding the fact that he or she may serve on the board of more than four public companies. In evaluating nominees, we consider the following factors:

 

·                  Whether the nominee attended less than 75 percent of the board and committee meetings without a valid excuse for the absences;

 

·                  Whether the nominee is an inside or affiliated outside director and sits on the audit, compensation, or nominating committees and/or the full board serves as the audit, compensation, or nominating committee or the company does not have one of these committees;

 

·                  Whether the board ignored a significant shareholder proposal that was approved by a majority of the votes cast in the previous year;

 

·                  Whether the board, without shareholder approval, to our knowledge instituted a new poison pill plan, extended an existing plan, or adopted a new plan upon the expiration of an existing plan during the past year;

 

·                  Whether the nominee is the Chairman or CEO of a publicly-traded company who serves on more than two public boards;

 

·                  Whether the nominee serves on more than four public company boards;

 

·                  If the nominee is an incumbent director, the length of tenure taking into account tenure limits recommended in local corporate governance codes(1);

 

·                  Whether the nominee has a material related party transaction or is believed by us to have a material conflict of interest with the portfolio company;

 

·                  Whether the nominee (or the overall board) in our view has a record of making poor corporate or strategic decisions or has demonstrated an overall lack of good business judgment;

 

·                  Material failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight(2), or fiduciary responsibilities at the

 


(1)  For example, in the UK, independent directors of publicly traded companies with tenure exceeding nine years are reclassified as non-independent unless the company can explain why they remain independent.

 

(2)  Examples of failure of risk oversight include, but are not limited to: bribery; large or serial fines from regulatory bodies; significant adverse legal judgments or settlements; hedging of company stock by the employees or directors of a company; or significant pledging of company stock in the aggregate by the officers and directors of a company.

 



 

company

 

·                  Whether the nominee serves on the audit committee where there is evidence (such as audit reports or reports mandated under the Sarbanes Oxley Act) that there exists material weaknesses in the company’s internal controls;

 

·                  Whether the nominee serves on the compensation committee if that director was present at the time of the grant of backdated options or options the pricing or the timing of which we believe may have been manipulated to provide additional benefits to executives;

 

·                  Failure to replace management as appropriate; and

 

·                  Egregious actions related to a director’s service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about his or her ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company.

 

Proxy Access

 

We recognize the importance of shareholder access to the ballot process as a means to ensure that boards do not become self-perpetuating and self-serving.  However, we are also aware that some proposals may promote certain interest groups and could be disruptive to the nomination process.  We vote on a case-by-case basis considering the proxy access terms in light of a company’s specific circumstances and we may support proxy access proposals when management and boards have displayed a lack of shareholder accountability.  Director candidates nominated pursuant to proxy access will be considered in accordance with the contested election guidelines below.

 

Proxy Contests

 

Director Nominees in a Contested Election

 

By definition, this type of board candidate or slate runs for the purpose of seeking a significant change in corporate policy or control.  Therefore, the economic impact of the vote in favor of or in opposition to that director or slate must be analyzed using a higher standard such as is normally applied to changes in control.  Criteria for evaluating director nominees as a group or individually should also include: the underlying reason why the new slate (or individual director) is being proposed; performance; compensation; corporate governance provisions and takeover activity; criminal activity; attendance at meetings; investment in the company; interlocking directorships; inside, outside and independent directors; number of other board seats; and other experience.  It is impossible to have a general policy regarding director nominees in a contested election.

 

Reimbursement of Proxy Solicitation Expenses

 

Decisions to provide full reimbursement for dissidents waging a proxy contest should be made on a case-by-case basis. In the absence of compelling reasons, Cohen & Steers will generally not support such proposals.

 

Ratification of Auditors

 

We vote for proposals to ratify auditors, auditor remuneration and/or proposals authorizing the board to fix audit fees, unless:

 



 

·                  an auditor has a financial interest in or association with the company, and is therefore not independent;

 

·                  there is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered an opinion that is neither accurate nor indicative of the company’s financial position;

 

·                  the name of the proposed auditor and/or fees paid to the audit firm are not disclosed by the company in a timely manner prior to the meeting;

 

·                  the auditors are being changed without explanation; or

 

·                  fees paid for non-audit related services are excessive and/or exceed limits set in local best practice recommendations or law.

 

In circumstances where fees for non-audit services include fees related to significant one-time capital structure events; initial public offerings; bankruptcy emergence, and spinoffs; and the company makes public disclosure of the amount and nature of those fees, then such fees may be excluded from the non-audit fees considered in determining whether non-audit related fees are excessive.

 

We vote on a case-by-case basis on auditor rotation proposals.  Criteria for evaluating the rotation proposal include, but are not limited to: tenure of the audit firm; establishment and disclosure of a renewal process whereby the auditor is regularly evaluated for both audit quality and competitive price; length of the rotation period advocated in the proposal; and any significant audit related issues.

 

Generally, we vote against auditor indemnification and limitation of liability; however we recognize there may be situations where indemnification and limitations on liability may be appropriate.

 

Takeover Defenses

 

While we recognize that a takeover attempt can be a significant distraction for the board and management to deal with, the simple fact is that the possibility of a corporate takeover keeps management focused on maximizing shareholder value.  As a result, Cohen & Steers opposes measures that are designed to prevent or obstruct corporate takeovers because they can entrench current management.  The following are our guidelines on change of control issues:

 

Shareholder Rights Plans

 

We acknowledge that there are arguments for and against shareholder rights plans, also known as “poison pills.”  Companies should put their case for rights plans to shareholders.

 

We review on a case-by-case basis management proposals to ratify a poison pill. We generally look for shareholder friendly features including a two- to three-year sunset provision, a permitted bid provision and a 20 percent or higher flip-in provision.

 

Greenmail

 

We vote for proposals to adopt anti-greenmail charter or bylaw amendments or otherwise restrict a company’s ability to make greenmail payments.

 

Unequal Voting Rights

 

Generally, we vote against dual-class recapitalizations as they offer an effective way for a firm to thwart

 



 

hostile takeovers by concentrating voting power in the hands of management or other insiders.  We support the one-share, one-vote principle for voting.

 

Classified Boards

 

We generally vote in favor of shareholder proposals to declassify a board of directors, although we acknowledge that a classified board may be in the long-term best interests of the shareholders of a company in certain situations, such as continuity of a strong board and management team or for certain types of companies.  In voting on shareholder proposals to declassify a board of directors, we evaluate all facts and circumstances surrounding such proposal, including whether: (i) the current management and board have a track record of making good corporate or strategic decisions, (ii) the shareholder proposing the de-classification has an agenda in making such proposal that may be at odds with the long-term best interests of the shareholders of the company, or (iii) it would be in the best interests of the company to thwart a shareholder’s attempt to control the board of directors.

 

Cumulative Voting

 

Having the ability to cumulate our votes for the election of directors — that is, cast more than one vote for a director about whom they feel strongly — generally increases shareholders’ rights to effect change in the management of a corporation. However, we acknowledge that cumulative voting promotes special candidates who may not represent the interests of all, or even a majority, of shareholders.  In voting on proposals to institute cumulative voting, we therefore evaluate all facts and circumstances surrounding such proposal and we generally vote against cumulative voting where the company has good corporate governance practices in place, including majority voting for board elections and de-classified boards.

 

Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meeting

 

Cohen & Steers votes on a case-by-case basis for shareholder proposals requesting companies to amend their governance documents (bylaws and/or charter) in order to allow shareholders to call special meetings.

 

Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent

 

We generally vote against proposals to allow or facilitate shareholder action by written consent.  The requirement that all shareholders be given notice of a shareholders’ meeting and matters to be discussed therein seems to provide a reasonable protection of minority shareholder rights.

 

Shareholder Ability to Alter the Size of the Board

 

We generally vote for proposals that seek to fix the size of the board and vote against proposals that give management the ability to alter the size of the board without shareholder approval. While we recognize the importance of such proposals, we are however also aware that these proposals are sometimes put forth in order to promote the agenda(s) of certain special interest groups and could be disruptive to the management of the company.

 

Miscellaneous Board Provisions

 

Board Committees

 

Boards should delegate key oversight functions, such as responsibility for audit, nominating and compensation issues, to independent committees. The chairman and members of any committee should be

 



 

clearly identified in the annual report. Any committee should have the authority to engage independent advisors where appropriate at the company’s expense.

 

Audit, nominating and compensation committees should consist solely of non-employee directors, who are independent of management.

 

Independent Chairman

 

We review on a case-by-case basis proposals requiring that the chairman’s position be filled by an independent director, taking into consideration the company’s current board leadership and governance structure; company performance, and any other factors that may be applicable.

 

Separate Chairman and CEO Role

 

We will generally vote for proposals looking to separate the CEO and Chairman roles.  We do acknowledge, however, that under certain circumstances, it may be reasonable for the CEO and Chairman roles to be held by a single person.

 

Lead Directors and Executive Sessions

 

In cases where the CEO and Chairman roles are combined or the Chairman is not independent, we will vote for the appointment of a lead independent director and for regular executive sessions (board meetings taking place without the CEO/Chairman present).

 

Majority of Independent Directors

 

We vote for proposals that call for the board to be composed of a majority of independent directors. We believe that a majority of independent directors can be an important factor in facilitating objective decision making and enhancing accountability to shareholders.

 

Independent Committees

 

We vote for shareholder proposals requesting that the board’s audit, compensation, and nominating committees consist exclusively of independent directors.

 

Stock Ownership Requirements

 

We support measures requiring senior executives to hold a minimum amount of stock in a company (often expressed as a percentage of annual compensation), which may include restricted stock or restricted stock units.

 

Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability Protection

 

We generally support indemnification provisions that are consistent with the local jurisdiction in which the company has been formed.  We vote in favor of proposals providing indemnification for directors and officers with respect to acts conducted in the normal course of business.  We also vote in favor of proposals that expand coverage for directors and officers where, despite an unsuccessful legal defense, the director or officer acted in good faith and in the best interests of the company and the director or officers’ legal expenses are covered.  We vote against proposals that would expand indemnification beyond

 



 

coverage of legal expenses to coverage of acts, such as gross negligence, that are more serious violations of fiduciary obligations.

 

Board Size

 

We generally vote for proposals to limit the size of the board to 15 members or less.

 

Majority Vote Standard

 

We generally vote for proposals asking for the board to initiate the appropriate process to amend the company’s governance documents (charter or bylaws) to provide that director nominees shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast at an annual meeting of shareholders..

 

Supermajority Vote Requirements

 

We generally support proposals that seek to lower super-majority voting requirements

 

Disclosure of Board Nominees

 

We generally vote against the election of directors at companies if the names of the director nominees are not disclosed in a timely manner prior to the meeting.  However, we recognize that companies in certain emerging markets may have a legitimate reason for not disclosing nominee names. In such a rare case, if a company discloses a legitimate reason why such nominee names should not be disclosed, we may vote for the nominees even if nominee names are not disclosed in a timely manner.

 

Disclosure of Board Compensation

 

We generally vote against the election of directors at companies if the compensation paid to such directors is not disclosed in a timely manner prior to the meeting.  However, we recognize that companies in certain emerging markets may have a legitimate reason for not disclosing such compensation information. In such a rare case, if a company discloses a legitimate reason why such compensation should not be disclosed, we may vote for the nominees even if compensation is not disclosed in a timely manner.

 

Miscellaneous Governance Provisions

 

Confidential Voting

 

We vote for shareholder proposals requesting that companies adopt confidential voting, use independent tabulators, and use independent inspectors of election as long as the proposals include clauses for proxy contests as follows: in the case of a contested election, management should be permitted to request that the dissident group honor its confidential voting policy. If the dissidents agree, the policy remains in place. If the dissidents do not agree, the confidential voting policy is waived.

 

We also vote for management proposals to adopt confidential voting.

 

Bundled Proposals

 

We review on a case-by-case basis bundled or “conditioned” proxy proposals. In the case of items that are conditioned upon each other, we examine the benefits and costs of the packaged items.  In instances where the joint effect of the conditioned items is not in shareholders’ best interests, we vote against the

 



 

proposals.  If the combined effect is positive, we support such proposals. In the case of bundled director proposals, we will vote for the entire slate only if we would have otherwise voted for each director on an individual basis.

 

Date/Location of Meeting

 

We vote against shareholder proposals to change the date or location of the shareholders’ meeting. No one site will meet the needs of all shareholders.

 

Adjourn Meeting if Votes are Insufficient.

 

Open-end requests for adjournment of a shareholder meeting generally will not be supported.  However, where management specifically states the reason for requesting an adjournment and the requested adjournment is necessary to permit a proposal that would otherwise be supported under this policy to be carried out, the adjournment request will be supported.

 

Disclosure of Shareholder Proponents

 

We vote for shareholder proposals requesting that companies disclose the names of shareholder proponents. Shareholders may wish to contact the proponents of a shareholder proposal for additional information.

 

Other Business

 

Cohen & Steers will generally vote against proposals to approve other business where we cannot determine the exact nature of the proposal to be voted on.

 

Capital Structure

 

Increase Additional Common Stock

 

We generally vote for increases in authorized shares, provided that the increase is not greater than three times the number of shares outstanding and reserved for issuance (including shares reserved for stock-related plans and securities convertible into common stock, but not shares reserved for any poison pill plan).

 

Votes generally are cast in favor of proposals to authorize additional shares of stock except where the proposal:

 

·                  creates a blank check preferred stock; or

·                  establishes classes of stock with superior voting rights.

 

Blank Check Preferred Stock

 

Votes generally are cast in opposition to management proposals authorizing the creation of new classes of preferred stock with unspecific voting, conversion, distribution and other rights, and management proposals to increase the number of authorized blank check preferred shares.  We may vote in favor of this type of proposal when we receive assurances to our reasonable satisfaction that (i) the preferred stock was authorized by the board for the use of legitimate capital formation purposes and not for anti-takeover purposes, and (ii) no preferred stock will be issued with voting power that is disproportionate to the economic interests of the preferred stock.  These representations should be made either in the proxy statement or in a separate letter from the company to Cohen & Steers.

 



 

Pre-emptive Rights

 

We believe that the governance and regulation of public equity markets allow for adequate shareholder protection against dilution.  Further, we believe that companies should have more flexibility to issue shares without costly and time constraining rights offerings. As such, we do not believe that pre-emptive rights are necessary and as such, we generally vote for the issuance of equity shares without pre-emptive rights. On a limited basis, we will vote for shareholder pre-emptive rights where such pre-emptive rights are necessary, taking into account the best interests of the company’s shareholders.

 

We acknowledge that international local practices typically call for shareholder pre-emptive rights when a company seeks authority to issue shares (e.g., UK authority for the issuance of only up to 5% of outstanding shares without pre-emptive rights).  While we would prefer that companies be permitted to issue shares without pre-emptive rights, in deference to international local practices, we will approve issuance requests with pre-emptive rights.

 

Dual Class Capitalizations

 

Because classes of common stock with unequal voting rights limit the rights of certain shareholders, we vote against adoption of a dual or multiple class capitalization structure.

 

Restructurings/Recapitalizations

 

We review proposals to increase common and/or preferred shares and to issue shares as part of a debt restructuring plan on a case-by-case basis.  In voting, we consider the following issues:

 

·                  dilution—how much will ownership interest of existing shareholders be reduced, and how extreme will dilution to any future earnings be?

·                  change in control—will the transaction result in a change in control of the company?

·                  bankruptcy—generally, approve proposals that facilitate debt restructurings unless there are clear signs of self-dealing or other abuses.

 

Share Repurchase Programs

 

Boards may institute share repurchase or stock buy-back programs for a number of reasons. Cohen & Steers will generally vote in favor of such programs where the repurchase would be in the long-term best interests of shareholders, and where the company is not thought to be able to use the cash in a more useful way.

 

Targeted Share Placements

 

These shareholder proposals ask companies to seek stockholder approval before placing 10% or more of their voting stock with a single investor. The proposals are typically in reaction to the placement by various companies of a large block of their voting stock in an ESOP, parent capital fund or with a single friendly investor, with the aim of protecting themselves against a hostile tender offer. These proposals are voted on a case-by-case basis after reviewing the individual situation of the company receiving the proposal.

 

Executive and Director Compensation

 

Executive Compensation (“Say on Pay”)

 



 

Votes regarding shareholder “say on pay” are determined on a case-by-case basis.  Generally, we believe that executive compensation should be tied to the long-term performance of the executive and the company both in absolute and relative to the peer group.  We therefore monitor the compensation practices of portfolio companies to determine whether compensation to these executives is commensurate to the company’s total shareholder return (TSR) (i.e., we generally expect companies that pay their executives at the higher end of the pay range to also be performing commensurately well).

 

Further, pay elements that are not directly based on performance are generally evaluated on a case-by-case basis considering the context of a company’s overall pay program and demonstrated pay-for-performance philosophy. The following list highlights certain negative pay practices that carry significant weight in this overall consideration and may result in adverse vote recommendations:

 

·                  Repricing or replacing of underwater stock options/SARS without prior shareholder approval (including cash buyouts and voluntary surrender of underwater options);

·                  Excessive perquisites or tax gross-ups;

·                  New or extended agreements that provide for:

·                  Change in Control (“CIC”) payments exceeding 3 times base salary and bonus;

·                  CIC severance payments without involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties (“single” or “modified single” triggers);

·                  CIC payments with excise tax gross-ups (including “modified” gross-ups).

 

Also, we generally vote for shareholder proposals that seek additional disclosure of executive and director pay information.

 

Frequency of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (“Say When on Pay”)

 

We generally vote for annual advisory votes on compensation as we note that executive compensation is also evaluated on an annual basis by the company’s compensation committee.

 

Stock-based Incentive Plans

 

Votes with respect to compensation plans should be determined on a case-by-case basis depending on a combination of certain plan features and equity grant practices, where positive factors may counterbalance negative factors, and vice versa, as evaluated in three pillars:

 

·                  Plan Cost:  The total estimated cost of the company’s equity plans relative to industry/market cap peers, measured by the company’s estimated Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) in relation to peers and considering both:

·            SVT based on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants, plus outstanding unvested/unexercised grants; and

·            SVT based only on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants.

 

·                  Plan Features:

·            Automatic single-triggered award vesting upon CIC;

·            Discretionary vesting authority;

·            Liberal share recycling on various award types;

·            Minimum vesting period for grants made under the plan.

 



 

·                  Grant Practices:

·            The company’s three year burn rate relative to its industry/market cap peers;

·            Vesting requirements in most recent CEO equity grants (3-year look-back);

·            The estimated duration of the plan based on the sum of shares remaining available and the new shares requested, divided by the average annual shares granted in the prior three years;

·            The proportion of the CEO’s most recent equity grants/awards subject to performance conditions;

·            Whether the company maintains a claw-back policy;

·            Whether the company has established post exercise/vesting share-holding requirements.

 

We will generally vote against the plan proposal if the combination of factors indicates that the plan is not, overall, in the shareholders’ interest, or if any of the following apply:

 

·                  Awards may vest in connection with a liberal CIC;

·                  The plan would permit repricing or cash buyout of underwater options without shareholder approval;

·                  The plan is a vehicle for problematic pay practices or a pay-for-performance disconnect; or

·                  Any other plan features that are determined to have a significant negative impact on shareholder interests.

 

Approval of Cash or Cash-and-Stock Bonus Plans

 

We vote for cash or cash-and-stock bonus plans to exempt the compensation from limits on deductibility under the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

Reload/Evergreen Features

 

We will generally vote against plans that enable the issuance of reload options and that provide an automatic share replenishment (“evergreen”) feature.

 

Golden Parachutes

 

In general, the guidelines call for voting against “golden parachute” plans because they impede potential takeovers that shareholders should be free to consider. In particular, we oppose the use of employment contracts that result in cash grants of greater than three times annual compensation (salary and bonus) and generally withhold our votes at the next shareholder meeting for directors who to our knowledge approved golden parachutes.

 

Voting on Golden Parachutes in an Acquisition, Merger, Consolidation, or Proposed Sale

 

We vote on a case-by-case basis on proposals to approve the company’s golden parachute compensation. Features that may lead to a vote against include:

 

·                  Potentially excessive severance payments (cash grants of greater than three times annual compensation (salary and bonus));

·                  Agreements that include excessive excise tax gross-up provisions;

·                  Single trigger payments that will happen immediately upon a change in control, including cash payment and such items as the acceleration of performance-based equity despite the failure to achieve performance measures;

 



 

·                  Single-trigger vesting of equity based on a definition of change in control that requires only shareholder approval of the transaction (rather than consummation);

·                  Recent amendments or other changes that may make packages so attractive as to influence merger agreements that may not be in the best interests of shareholders;

·                  In the case of a substantial gross-up from pre-existing/grandfathered contract: the element that triggered the gross-up (i.e., option mega-grants at low point in stock price, unusual or outsized payments in cash or equity made or negotiated prior to the merger); or

·                  The company’s assertion that a proposed transaction is conditioned on shareholder approval of the golden parachute advisory vote.

 

401(k) Employee Benefit Plans

 

We vote for proposals to implement a 401(k) savings plan for employees.

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plans

 

We support employee stock purchase plans, although we generally believe the discounted purchase price should be at least 85% of the current market price.

 

Option Expensing

 

We vote for shareholder proposals to expense fixed-price options.

 

Vesting

 

We believe that restricted stock awards normally should vest over at least a two-year period.

 

Option Repricing

 

Stock options generally should not be re-priced, and never should be re-priced without shareholder approval.  In addition, companies should not issue new options, with a lower strike price, to make up for previously issued options that are substantially underwater.  Cohen & Steers will vote against the election of any slate of directors that, to its knowledge, has authorized a company to re-price or replace underwater options during the most recent year without shareholder approval.

 

Stock Holding Periods

 

Generally vote against all proposals requiring executives to hold the stock received upon option exercise for a specific period of time.

 

Transferable Stock Options

 

Review on a case-by-case basis proposals to grant transferable stock options or otherwise permit the transfer of outstanding stock options, including cost of proposal and alignment with shareholder interests.

 

Recoup Bonuses

 

We generally vote for shareholder proposals to recoup incentive bonuses or other incentive payments made to senior executives if it is later determined that fraud, misconduct, or negligence significantly contributed to a restatement of financial results that led to the awarding of incentive compensation.

 



 

Incorporation

 

Reincorporation Outside of the United States

 

Generally, we will vote against companies looking to reincorporate outside of the U.S.

 

Voting on State Takeover Statutes

 

We review on a case-by-case basis proposals to opt in or out of state takeover statutes (including control share acquisition statutes, control share cash-out statutes, freezeout provisions, fair price provisions, stakeholder laws, poison pill endorsements, severance pay and labor contract provisions, anti-greenmail provisions, and disgorgement provisions). In voting on these shareholder proposals, we evaluate all facts and circumstances surrounding such proposal, including whether the shareholder proposing such measure has an agenda in making such proposal that may be at odds with the long-term best interests of the company or whether it would be in the best interests of the company to thwart a shareholder’s attempt to control the board of directors.

 

Voting on Reincorporation Proposals

 

Proposals to change a company’s state of incorporation are examined on a case-by-case basis. In making our decision, we review management’s rationale for the proposal, changes to the charter/bylaws, and differences in the state laws governing the companies.

 

Mergers and Corporate Restructurings

 

Mergers and Acquisitions

 

Votes on mergers and acquisitions should be considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account factors including the following: anticipated financial and operating benefits; offer price (cost vs. premium); prospects of the combined companies; how the deal was negotiated; and changes in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder rights.

 

We vote against proposals that require a super-majority of shareholders to approve a merger or other significant business combination.

 

Nonfinancial Effects of a Merger or Acquisition

 

Some companies have proposed a charter provision which specifies that the board of directors may examine the nonfinancial effect of a merger or acquisition on the company.  This provision would allow the board to evaluate the impact a proposed change in control would have on employees, host communities, suppliers and/or others.  We generally vote against proposals to adopt such charter provisions.  We feel it is the directors’ fiduciary duty to base decisions solely on the financial interests of the shareholders.

 

Corporate Restructuring

 

Votes on corporate restructuring proposals, including minority squeeze outs, leveraged buyouts, “going private” proposals, spin-offs, liquidations, and asset sales, should be considered on a case-by-case basis In evaluating these proposals and determining our votes, we are singularly focused on meeting our goal of maximizing long-term shareholder value.

 



 

Spin-offs

 

Votes on spin-offs should be considered on a case-by-case basis depending on the tax and regulatory advantages, planned use of sale proceeds, market focus, and managerial incentives.

 

Asset Sales

 

Votes on asset sales should be made on a case-by-case basis after considering the impact on the balance sheet/working capital, value received for the asset, and potential elimination of diseconomies.

 

Liquidations

 

Votes on liquidations should be made on a case-by-case basis after reviewing management’s efforts to pursue other alternatives, appraisal value of assets, and the compensation plan for executives managing the liquidation.

 

Appraisal Rights

 

We vote for proposals to restore, or provide shareholders with, rights of appraisal. Rights of appraisal provide shareholders who are not satisfied with the terms of certain corporate transactions the right to demand a judicial review in order to determine a fair value for their shares.

 

Changing Corporate Name

 

We vote for changing the corporate name.

 

Shareholder Rights

 

Our position on the rights of shareholders is as follows:

 

·                  Shareholders should be given the opportunity to exercise their rights. Notification of opportunities for the exercise of voting rights should be given in good time.

·                  Shareholders are entitled to submit questions to company management.

·                  Minority shareholders should be protected as far as possible from the exercise of voting rights by majority shareholders.

·                  Shareholders are entitled to hold company management as well as the legal person or legal entity accountable for any action caused by the company or company management for which the company, company management or legal entity should bear responsibility.

 

Environmental and Social Issues

 

We recognize that the companies in which we invest can enhance shareholder value and long-term profitability by adopting policies and procedures that promote corporate social and environmental responsibility.  Because of the diverse nature of environmental and social shareholder proposals and the myriad ways companies deal with them, these proposals should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

 

All such proposals are scrutinized based on whether they contribute to the creation of shareholder value, are reasonable and relevant, and provide adequate disclosure of key issues to shareholders.  When

 



 

evaluating social and environmental shareholder proposals, we consider the following factors (in the order of importance as set forth below):

 

·                  The financial implications of the proposal, including whether adoption of the proposal is likely to have significant economic benefit for the company, such that shareholder value is enhanced or protected by the adoption of the proposal;

·                  Whether the issues presented are more appropriately/effectively dealt with through governmental or company-specific action, as many social and environmental issues are more properly the province of government and broad regulatory action;

·                  Whether the subject of the proposal is best left to the discretion of the board;

·                  Whether the company has already responded in some appropriate manner to the request embodied in the proposal;

·                  Whether the information requested concerns business issues that relate to a meaningful percentage of the company’s business as measured by sales, assets, and earnings;

·                  The degree to which the company’s stated position on the issues raised in the proposal could affect its reputation or sales, or leave it vulnerable to a boycott or selective purchasing;

·                  Whether implementation of the proposal’s request would achieve the proposal’s objectives;

·                  Whether the requested information is available to shareholders either from the company or from a publicly available source; and

·                  Whether providing this information would reveal proprietary or confidential information that would place the company at a competitive disadvantage.

 

Item 8.  Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies.

 

Information pertaining to the portfolio manager of the registrant, as of March 9, 2017, is set forth below.

 

Douglas R. Bond

 

·                  Vice President

 

·                  Portfolio manager since inception

Executive vice president of C&S since 2004.

 

The portfolio manager listed above manages other investment companies and/or investment vehicles and accounts in addition to the registrant. The following tables show, as of December 31, 2016, the number of other accounts the portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets in the accounts managed within each category. The portfolio manager does not receive performance-based fees with respect to any of the registered investment companies, other pooled investment vehicles or other accounts that he manages.

 



 

Douglas R. Bond

 

 

 

Number of accounts

 

Total assets

 

·                  Registered investment companies

 

1

 

$

294,885,412

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·                  Other pooled investment vehicles

 

0

 

$

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·                  Other accounts

 

2

 

$

157,188,220

 

 

Share Ownership. The following table indicates the dollar range of securities of the registrant owned by the registrant’s portfolio manager as of December 31, 2016:

 

 

 

Dollar Range of Securities Owned

 

Douglas R. Bond

 

$100,001-$500,000

 

 

Conflicts of Interest. It is possible that conflicts of interest may arise in connection with the portfolio manager’s management of the registrant’s investments on the one hand and the investments of other accounts or vehicles for which the portfolio managers are responsible on the other. For example, a portfolio manager may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time, resources and investment opportunities among the registrant and the other accounts or vehicles he advises. In addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions among the registrant and the other accounts, a portfolio manager may take action with respect to another account that differs from the action taken with respect to the registrant.

 

In some cases, another account managed by a portfolio manager may provide more revenue to the Advisor. While this may appear to create additional conflicts of interest for the portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities, the Advisor strives to ensure that portfolio managers endeavor to exercise their discretion in a manner that is equitable to all interested persons. In this regard, in the absence of specific account-related impediments (such as client-imposed restrictions or lack of available cash), it is the policy of the Advisor to allocate investment ideas pro rata to all accounts with the same primary investment objective.

 

In addition, certain of the portfolio managers may from time to time manage one or more accounts on behalf of the Advisor and its affiliated companies (the “CNS Accounts”).  Certain securities held and traded in the CNS Accounts also may be held and traded in one or more client accounts.  It is the policy of the Advisor however not to put the interests of the CNS Accounts ahead of the interests of client accounts.  The Advisor may aggregate orders of client accounts with those of the CNS Accounts; however, under no circumstances will preferential treatment be given to the CNS Accounts.  For all orders involving the CNS Accounts, purchases or sales will be allocated prior to trade placement, and orders that are only partially filled will be allocated across all accounts in proportion to the shares each account, including the CNS Accounts, was

 



 

designated to receive prior to trading.  As a result, it is expected that the CNS Accounts will receive the same average price as other accounts included in the aggregated order.  Shares will not be allocated or re-allocated to the CNS Accounts after trade execution or after the average price is known.  In the event so few shares of an order are executed that a pro-rata allocation is not practical, a rotational system of allocation may be used; however, the CNS Accounts will never be part of that rotation or receive shares of a partially filled order other than on a pro-rata basis.

 

Because certain CNS Accounts are managed with a cash management objective, it is possible that a security will be sold out of the CNS Accounts but continue to be held for one or more client accounts.  In situations when this occurs, such security will remain in a client account only if the portfolio manager, acting in its reasonable judgment and consistent with its fiduciary duties, believes this is appropriate for, and consistent with the objectives and profile of, the client account.

 

Advisor Compensation Structure. Compensation of the Advisor’s portfolio managers and other investment professionals has three primary components: (1) a base salary, (2) an annual cash bonus and (3) long-term stock-based compensation consisting generally of restricted stock units of the Advisor’s parent, CNS. The Advisor’s investment professionals, including the portfolio managers, also receive certain retirement, insurance and other benefits that are broadly available to all of its employees. Compensation of the Advisor’s investment professionals is reviewed primarily on an annual basis. Cash bonuses, stock-based compensation awards, and adjustments in base salary are typically paid or put into effect in the January following the fiscal year-end of CNS.

 

Method to Determine Compensation. The Advisor compensates its portfolio managers based primarily on the total return performance of funds and accounts managed by the portfolio manager versus appropriate peer groups or benchmarks. C&S uses a variety of benchmarks to evaluate each portfolio managers’ performance for compensation purposes, including the Morningstar U.S. All Taxable Ex-Foreign Equity Index and other broad based indexes based on the asset classes managed by each portfolio manager.  In evaluating the performance of a portfolio manager, primary emphasis is normally placed on one- and three-year performance, with secondary consideration of performance over longer periods of time.  Performance is evaluated on a pre-tax and pre-expense basis. In addition to rankings within peer groups of funds on the basis of absolute performance, consideration may also be given to risk-adjusted performance. For funds and accounts with a primary investment objective of high current income, consideration will also be given to the fund’s and account’s success in achieving this objective. For portfolio managers responsible for multiple funds and accounts, investment performance is evaluated on an aggregate basis. The Advisor has two funds or accounts with performance-based advisory fees. Portfolio managers are also evaluated on the basis of their success in managing their dedicated team of analysts. Base compensation for portfolio managers of the Advisor varies in line with the portfolio manager’s seniority and position with the firm.

 

Salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation are also influenced by the operating performance of the Advisor and CNS.  While the annual salaries of the Advisor’s portfolio managers are fixed, cash bonuses and stock based compensation may fluctuate significantly from year to year, based on changes in manager performance and other factors.

 



 

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

 

None.

 

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

 

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s Board implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to this Item.

 

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

 

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, based upon such officers’ evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.

 

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 12. Exhibits.

 

(a)(1) Not Applicable.

 

(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive officer and principal financial officer as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

 

(a)(3) Not Applicable.

 

(b) Certifications of principal executive officer and principal financial officer as required by Rule 30a- 2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

 



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Adam M. Derechin

 

 

Name: Adam M. Derechin

 

 

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Date: March 9, 2017

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

By:

/s/ Adam M. Derechin

 

 

Name:

Adam M. Derechin

 

 

Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

By:

/s/ James Giallanza

 

 

Name:

James Giallanza

 

 

Title:

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

Date: March 9, 2017