Edgar Filing: SIERRA BANCORP

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

Commission file number: 000-33063

Sierra Bancorp

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

California	33-0937517
(State of Incorporation)	(IRS Employer Identification No)

86 North Main Street, Porterville, California 93257

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(559) 782-4900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer þ
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common stock, no par value, 13,970,266 shares outstanding as of July 31, 2014

FORM 10-Q

Table of Contents

					Page
Part I - Financial Information					1
	Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)				1
		Consolidated Balance Sheets			1
		Consolidated Statements of Income			2
		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income			3
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows			4
		Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements			5

	Item 2. Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations				27
		Forward-Looking Statements			27
		Critical Accounting Policies			27
		Overview of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition			28
		Earnings Performance			29
			Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin		29
			Provision for Loan and Lease Losses		33
			Non-interest Income and Non-Interest Expense		34
			Provision for Income Taxes		36
		Balance Sheet Analysis			37
			Earning Assets		37
				Investments	37
				Loan and Lease Portfolio	38
				Nonperforming Assets	39
				Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	40
				Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements	42
			Other Assets		42
			Deposits and Interest-Bearing Liabilities		43
				Deposits	43
				Other Interest-Bearing Liabilities	44
			Other Non-Interest Bearing Liabilities		44
		Liquidity and Market Risk Management			44
		Capital Resources			46

	Item 3. Qualitative & Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk				48

	Item 4. Controls and Procedures				48

Part II - Other Information					49
	Item 1. - Legal Proceedings				49
	Item 1A. - Risk Factors				49
	Item 2. - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds				49
	Item 3. - Defaults upon Senior Securities				49
	Item 4. - (Removed and Reserved)				49
	Item 5. - Other Information				49
	Item 6. - Exhibits				50

Signatures					51

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 – Financial Statements

SIERRA BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands)

	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
ASSETS		(unaudited)			(audited)
Cash and due from banks	$	44,796		$	51,342
Interest-bearing deposits in banks		4,028			26,664
Total cash & cash equivalents		48,824			78,006
Investment securities available for sale		459,744			425,044
Loans held for sale		-			105
Loans and leases:
Gross loans and leases		893,041			803,242
Allowance for loan and lease losses		(11,634	)		(11,677	)
Deferred loan and lease fees, net		1,393			1,522
Net loans and leases		882,800			793,087
Premises and equipment, net		20,794			20,393
Foreclosed assets		4,498			8,185
Goodwill		5,544			5,544
Other assets		75,835			79,885
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,498,039		$	1,410,249

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	351,757		$	365,997
Interest bearing		894,370			808,182
Total deposits		1,246,127			1,174,179
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements		6,094			5,974
Short-term borrowings		7,750			-
Junior subordinated debentures		30,928			30,928
Other liabilities		20,218			17,494
TOTAL LIABILITIES		1,311,117			1,228,575
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, no par value; 24,000,000 shares
authorized; 14,009,139 and 14,179,439 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and
December 31, 2013, respectively		65,310			65,780
Additional paid in capital		2,539			2,648
Retained earnings		115,580			112,817
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,493			429
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY		186,922			181,674

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	1,498,039		$	1,410,249

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

SIERRA BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(dollars in thousands, except per share data, unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
Interest income:	2014		2013		2014		2013
Interest and fees on loans	$	11,057	$	11,368	$	21,408	$	22,275
Interest on investment securities:
Taxable		1,876		1,034		3,701		2,196
Tax-exempt		733		672		1,474		1,291
Interest on federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits		16		16		51		44
Total interest income		13,682		13,090		26,634		25,806

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		553		628		1,111		1,288
Interest on short-term borrowings		4		8		9		12
Interest on long-term borrowings		-		-		-		33
Interest on mandatorily redeemable trust preferred securities		175		179		349		356
Total interest expense		732		815		1,469		1,689

Net Interest Income		12,950		12,275		25,165		24,117

Provision for loan losses		200		450		350		2,050

Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses		12,750		11,825		24,815		22,067

Non-interest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		2,039		2,215		3,925		4,288
Gains on investment securities available-for-sale		183		-		287		6
Other income, net		1,796		1,807		3,513		3,844
Total non-interest income		4,018		4,022		7,725		8,138

Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		5,328		5,403		11,313		11,323
Occupancy expense		1,532		1,596		3,037		3,147
Other		4,148		3,718		7,386		8,068
Total non-interest expense		11,008		10,717		21,736		22,538

Income before income taxes		5,760		5,130		10,804		7,667

Provision for income taxes		1,523		1,331		2,768		1,535

Net Income	$	4,237	$	3,799	$	8,036	$	6,132

PER SHARE DATA
Book value	$	13.34	$	12.38	$	13.34	$	12.38
Cash dividends	$	0.08	$	0.06	$	0.16	$	0.12
Earnings per share basic	$	0.30	$	0.27	$	0.57	$	0.43
Earnings per share diluted	$	0.30	$	0.27	$	0.56	$	0.43
Average shares outstanding, basic		14,086,939		14,128,146		14,157,103		14,120,865
Average shares outstanding, diluted		14,212,532		14,227,335		14,291,359		14,211,910

Total shareholder equity (in thousands)	$	186,922	$	175,171	$	186,922	$	175,171
Shares outstanding		14,009,139		14,144,439		14,009,139		14,144,439
Dividends Paid	$	1,137,910	$	847,358	$	2,267,656	$	1,694,024

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

SIERRA BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(dollars in thousands, unaudited)

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013

Net Income	$	4,237		$	3,799		$	8,036		$	6,132
Other comprehensive income, before tax:
Unrealized gains on securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period		3,927			(6,157	)		5,493			(6,242	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains ⁽¹⁾ included in net income		(183	)		-			(287	)		(6	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax		3,744			(6,157	)		5,206			(6,248	)
Income tax expense related to items of other
comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax		(1,540	)		2,534			(2,142	)		2,571
Other comprehensive income (loss)		2,204			(3,623	)		3,064			(3,677	)

Comprehensive Income	$	6,441		$	176		$	11,100		$	2,455

⁽¹⁾ Amounts are included in net gains on investment securities available-for-sale on the Consolidated Statements of Income in non-interest revenue. Income tax expense associated with the reclassification adjustment for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $75 thousand and zero respectively. Income tax expense associated with the reclassification adjustment for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $118 thousand and $2 thousand respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

SIERRA BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands, unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	8,036		$	6,132
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of securities		(287	)		(6	)
Gain on sales of loans		(3	)		(68	)
Gain on disposal of fixed assets		-			(15	)
(Gain) loss on sale on foreclosed assets		(469	)		269
Writedowns on foreclosed assets		223			188
Share-based compensation expense		33			150
Provision for loan losses		350			2,050
Depreciation		1,038			1,151
Net amortization on securities premiums and discounts		3,285			4,337
Increase in unearned net loan fees		(129	)		(81	)
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies		(806	)		(933	)
Proceeds from sales of loans portfolio		108			2,288
Increase in loans held-for-sale		-			(2,533	)
Decrease in interest receivable and other assets		2,071			3,641
Decrease (increase) in other liabilites		2,724			(633	)
Net (Increase) decrease in FHLB stock		(190	)		438
Deferred income tax provision		833			8
Excess tax benefit from equity based compensation		-			(103	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		16,817			16,280

Cash flows from investing activities:
Maturities of securities available for sale		450			439
Proceeds from sales/calls of securities available for sale		9,210			1,221
Purchases of securities available for sale		(78,426	)		(77,966	)
Principal pay downs on securities available for sale		36,274			52,339
Net (increase) decrease in loans receivable, net		(90,117	)		63,776
Purchases of premises and equipment, net		(1,439	)		(226	)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets		4,116			10,546
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(119,932	)		50,129

Cash flows from financing activities:
Increase (decrease) in deposits		71,948			(19,019	)
Increase (decrease) in borrowed funds		7,750			(41,650	)
Increase in Fed funds purchased		-			544
Increase in repurchase agreements		120			-
Cash dividends paid		(2,268	)		(1,694	)
Repurchases of common stock		(4,281	)		-
Stock options exercised		664			471
Excess tax benefit from equity based compensation		-			103
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		73,933			(61,245	)

(Decrease) increase in cash and due from banks		(29,182	)		5,164

Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period		78,006			61,818
End of period	$	48,824		$	66,982

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Sierra Bancorp

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2014

Note 1 – The Business of Sierra Bancorp

Sierra Bancorp (the “Company”) is a California corporation headquartered in Porterville, California, and is a registered bank holding company under federal banking laws. The Company was formed to serve as the holding company for Bank of the Sierra (the “Bank”), and has been the Bank’s sole shareholder since August 2001. The Company exists primarily for the purpose of holding the stock of the Bank and of such other subsidiaries it may acquire or establish. At the present time, the Company’s only other subsidiaries are Sierra Statutory Trust II and Sierra Capital Trust III, which were formed in March 2004 and June 2006, respectively, solely to facilitate the issuance of capital trust pass-through securities (TRUPS). Pursuant to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB’s) standard on the consolidation of variable interest entities, these trusts are not reflected on a consolidated basis in the Company’s financial statements. References herein to the “Company” include Sierra Bancorp and its consolidated subsidiary, the Bank, unless the context indicates otherwise.

The Bank is a California state-chartered bank headquartered in Porterville, California, that offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services primarily to communities in the central and southern regions of the San Joaquin Valley. Our branch footprint stretches from Fresno on the north to Bakersfield on the south, and on the southern end extends east through the Tehachapi plateau and into the northwestern tip of the Mojave Desert. The Bank was incorporated in September 1977 and opened for business in January 1978, and in the ensuing years has grown to be the largest independent bank headquartered in the South San Joaquin Valley. Our growth has primarily been organic, but includes the acquisition of Sierra National Bank in 2000. We currently operate 25 full service branch offices throughout our geographic footprint, as well as an internet branch which provides the ability to open deposit accounts online. In addition to our full-service branches the Bank has a real estate industries group, an agricultural credit division, an SBA lending unit, and offsite ATMs at six different non-branch locations. The Bank’s deposit accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to maximum insurable amounts.

Note 2 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in a condensed format, and therefore do not include all of the information and footnotes required by US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for complete financial statements. The information furnished in these interim statements reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for such period. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q. In preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements, management has taken subsequent events into consideration and recognized them where appropriate. The results of operations in the interim statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other quarter, or for the full year. Certain amounts reported for 2013 have been reclassified to be consistent with the reporting for 2014. The interim financial information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Note 3 – Current Accounting Developments

In January 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-01, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects, to provide additional flexibility with regard to accounting for investments in qualified affordable housing projects. ASU 2014-01 modifies the conditions that must be met to present the pretax impact and related tax benefits of such investments as a component of income taxes (“net” within income tax expense), to enable more investors to elect to use a “net” presentation for those investments. Investors that do not qualify for “net” presentation under the new guidance will continue to account for such investments under the equity method or cost method, which results in losses recognized in pretax income and tax benefits recognized in income taxes (“gross” presentation of investment results). For investments that qualify for the “net” presentation of investment performance, ASU 2014-01 introduces a “proportional amortization method” that can be elected to amortize the investment basis. If elected, the method is required for all eligible investments in qualified affordable housing projects. ASU 2014-01 also requires enhanced recurring disclosures for all investments in qualified affordable housing projects, regardless of the accounting method used for those investments. It is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and early adoption is permitted. The Company currently expects to adopt ASU 2014-01 as of the first quarter of 2015. We will likely continue to account for our low-income housing tax credit investments using the equity method subsequent to our adoption of ASU 2014-01 and thus do not expect any impact on our income statement or balance sheet, but our disclosures with regard to low-income housing tax credit investments will be updated to reflect the new requirements.

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04, Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure, to resolve diversity in practice with respect to a creditor’s reclassification of a collateralized consumer mortgage loan to other real estate owned (OREO). Current US GAAP requires a loan to be reclassified to OREO upon a troubled debt restructuring that is “in substance a repossession or foreclosure”, where the creditor receives “physical possession” of the debtor's assets regardless of whether formal foreclosure proceedings take place. The terms “in substance a repossession or foreclosure” and “physical possession” are not defined in US GAAP; therefore, questions have arisen about when a creditor should reclassify a collateralized mortgage loan to OREO. ASU 2014-04 requires a creditor to reclassify a collateralized consumer mortgage loan to real estate property upon obtaining legal title to the real estate collateral, or when the borrower voluntarily conveys all interest in the real estate property to the lender to satisfy the loan through a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement. ASU 2014-04 is effective for public business entities for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. It will be adopted by the Company for the first quarter of 2015, and we do not expect any impact upon our financial statements or operations upon adoption.

Note 4 – Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, cash paid for interest due on interest-bearing liabilities was $1.502 million and $1.794 million, respectively. There was $160,000 in cash paid for income taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2014, but no cash paid for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Assets totaling $184,000 and $2.622 million were acquired in settlement of loans for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively. We received $4.116 million in cash from the sale of foreclosed assets during the first six months of 2014 relative to $10.156 million during the first six months of 2013, which represents sales proceeds less loans extended to finance such sales.

Note 5 – Share Based Compensation

The 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) was adopted by the Company in 2007. Our 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”) was concurrently terminated, although options to purchase 123,950 shares that were granted under the 1998 Plan were still outstanding as of June 30, 2014 and remain unaffected by that plan’s termination. The 2007 Plan provides for the issuance of both “incentive” and “nonqualified” stock options to officers and employees, and of “nonqualified” stock options to non-employee directors of the Company. The 2007 Plan also provides for the potential issuance of restricted stock awards to these same classes of eligible participants, on such terms and conditions as are established at the discretion of the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. The total number of shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued stock reserved for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2007 Plan was initially 1,500,000 shares, although the number remaining available for grant as of June 30, 2014 was 829,920. The dilutive impact of stock options outstanding is discussed below in Note 6, Earnings per Share. No restricted stock awards have been issued by the Company.

Pursuant to FASB’s standards on stock compensation, the value of each option granted is reflected in our income statement as employee compensation or directors’ expense by amortizing the value over the vesting period of such option or by expensing it as of the grant date for immediately vested options. The Company is utilizing the Black-Scholes model to value stock options, and the “multiple option” approach is used to allocate the resulting valuation to actual expense. Under the multiple option approach an employee’s options for each vesting period are separately valued and amortized, which appears to be the preferred method for option grants with graded vesting. A pre-tax charge of $21,000 was reflected in the Company’s income statement during the second quarter of 2014 and $57,000 was charged during the second quarter of 2013, as expense related to stock options. For the first half, the charges totaled $33,000 in 2014 and $151,000 in 2013.

Note 6 – Earnings per Share

The computation of earnings per share, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income, is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. There were 14,086,939 weighted average shares outstanding during the second quarter of 2014, and 14,128,146 during the second quarter of 2013. There were 14,157,103 weighted average shares outstanding during the first six months of 2014, and 14,120,865 during the first six months of 2013.

Diluted earnings per share include the effect of the potential issuance of common shares, which for the Company is limited to shares that would be issued on the exercise of “in-the-money” stock options. The dilutive effect of options outstanding was calculated using the treasury stock method, excluding anti-dilutive shares and adjusting for unamortized expense and windfall tax benefits. For the second quarter and first six months of 2014 the dilutive effect of options outstanding calculated under the treasury stock method totaled 125,593 and 134,256, respectively, which were added to basic weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share. Likewise, for the second quarter and first six months of 2013 shares totaling 99,189 and 91,045, respectively, were added to basic weighted average shares outstanding in order to calculate diluted earnings per share.

Note 7 – Comprehensive Income

As presented in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, comprehensive income includes net income and other comprehensive income. The Company’s only source of other comprehensive income is unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investment securities. Gains or losses on investment securities that were realized and included in net income of the current period, which had previously been included in other comprehensive income as unrealized holding gains or losses in the period in which they arose, are considered to be reclassification adjustments that are excluded from other comprehensive income in the current period.

Note 8 – Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business, in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. Those financial instruments consist of unused commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. They involve, to varying degrees, elements of risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and issuing letters of credit as it does for originating loans included on the balance sheet. The following financial instruments represent off-balance-sheet credit risk (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Commitments to extend credit	$	386,378	$	420,707
Standby letters of credit	$	8,884	$	8,703
Commercial letters of credit	$	8,069	$	8,070

Commitments to extend credit consist primarily of the unused or unfunded portions of the following: home equity lines of credit; commercial real estate construction loans, where disbursements are made over the course of construction; commercial revolving lines of credit; mortgage warehouse lines of credit; unsecured personal lines of credit; and formalized (disclosed) deposit account overdraft lines. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the unused portions of committed amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Standby letters of credit are generally unsecured and are issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party, while commercial letters of credit represent the Company’s commitment to pay a third party on behalf of a customer upon fulfillment of contractual requirements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as the risk involved in extending loans to customers.

The Company is also utilizing an $88 million letter of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank on the Company’s behalf as security for certain deposits. The letter of credit is backed by loans which are pledged to the Federal Home Loan Bank by the Company.

Note 9 – Fair Value Disclosures and Reporting, the Fair Value Option and Fair Value Measurements

FASB’s standards on financial instruments, and on fair value measurements and disclosures, require all entities to disclose in their financial statement footnotes the estimated fair values of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair values. In addition to disclosure requirements, FASB’s standard on investments requires that our debt securities, which are classified as available for sale, and our equity securities that have readily determinable fair values, be measured and reported at fair value in our statement of financial position. Certain impaired loans are also reported at fair value, as explained in greater detail below, and foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. FASB’s standard on financial instruments permits companies to report certain other financial assets and liabilities at fair value, but we have not elected the fair value option for any additional financial assets or liabilities.

Fair value measurements and disclosure standards also establish a framework for measuring fair values. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Further, the standards establish a fair value hierarchy that encourages an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and limit the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair values. The standards describe three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

	·	Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

	·	Level 2: Significant observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the factors that market participants would likely consider in pricing an asset or liability.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market data and information about the financial instruments. The estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument for sale at one time, nor do they attempt to estimate the value of anticipated future business related to the instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to realized gains and losses could have a significant effect on fair value estimates but have not been considered in any estimates. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value disclosures are based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. The estimates are subjective and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the fair values presented. The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company to estimate the fair value of its financial instruments disclosed at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Cash and cash equivalents and fed funds sold: The carrying amount is estimated to be fair value.

Investment securities: Fair values are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities by relying on their relationship to other benchmark quoted securities when quoted prices for specific securities are not readily available.

Loans and leases: For variable-rate loans and leases that re-price frequently with no significant change in credit risk or interest rate spread, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for other loans and leases are estimated by discounting projected cash flows at interest rates being offered at each reporting date for loans and leases with similar terms, to borrowers of comparable creditworthiness. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

Loans held for sale: Since loans designated by the Company as available-for-sale are typically sold shortly after making the decision to sell them, realized gains or losses are usually recognized within the same period and fluctuations in fair values are not relevant for reporting purposes. If available-for-sale loans are on our books for an extended period of time, the fair value of those loans is determined using quoted secondary-market prices.

Collateral-dependent impaired loans: Collateral-dependent impaired loans are carried at fair value when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement and the loan has been written down to the fair value of its underlying collateral, net of expected disposition costs where applicable.

Cash surrender value of life insurance policies: Fair values are based on net cash surrender values at each reporting date.

Investments in, and capital commitments to, limited partnerships: The fair values of our investments in WNC Institutional Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnerships and any other limited partnerships are estimated using quarterly indications of value provided by the general partner. The fair values of undisbursed capital commitments are assumed to be the same as their book values.

Other investments: Certain investments for which no secondary market exists are carried at cost unless an impairment analysis indicates the need for adjustments, and the carrying amount for those investments approximates their estimated fair value.

Deposits: Fair values for non-maturity deposits are equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date, which is the carrying amount. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a cash flow analysis, discounted at interest rates being offered at each reporting date by the Bank for certificates with similar remaining maturities. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts approximate fair values for federal funds purchased, overnight FHLB advances, borrowings under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days of the reporting dates. Fair values of other short-term borrowings are estimated by discounting projected cash flows at the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Long-term borrowings: Fair values are estimated using projected cash flows discounted at the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Subordinated debentures: Fair values are determined based on the current market value for like instruments of a similar maturity and structure.

Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit: If funded, the carrying amounts for currently unused commitments would approximate fair values for the newly created financial assets at the funding date. However, because of the high degree of uncertainty with regard to whether or not those commitments will ultimately be funded, fair values for loan commitments and letters of credit in their current undisbursed state cannot reasonably be estimated, and only notional values are disclosed in the table below.

Estimated fair values for the Company’s financial instruments are as follows, as of the dates noted:

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)	June 30, 2014
			Estimated Fair Value
	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	48,824	$	48,824	$	-	$	-	$	48,824
Investment securities available for sale		459,744		2,487		457,257		-		459,744
Loans and leases, net held for investment		862,856		-		874,610		-		874,610
Collateral dependent impaired loans		19,944		-		19,944		-		19,944
Loans held-for-sale		-		-		-		-		-
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies		40,230		-		40,230		-		40,230
Other investments		6,122		-		6,122		-		6,122
Investment in limited partnership		7,883		-		7,883		-		7,883
Accrued interest receivable		5,196		-		5,196		-		5,196

Financial liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	351,757	$	351,757	$	-	$	-	$	351,757
Interest-bearing		894,370		-		894,611		-		894,611
Fed funds purchased and repurchase agreements		6,094		-		6,094		-		6,094
Short-term borrowings		7,750		-		7,750		-		7,750
Long-term borrowings		-		-		-		-		-
Subordinated debentures		30,928		-		11,267		-		11,267
Limited partnership capital commitment		914		-		914		-		914
Accrued interest payable		153		-		153		-		153

		Notional Amount
Off-balance-sheet financial instruments:
Commitments to extend credit	$	386,378
Standby letters of credit		8,884
Commercial lines of credit		8,069

	December 31, 2013
			Estimated Fair Value
	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	78,006	$	78,006	$	-	$	-	$	78,006
Investment securities available for sale		425,044		2,456		422,588		-		425,044
Loans and leases, net held for investment		778,382		-		797,383		-		797,383
Collateral dependent impaired loans		14,705		-		14,705		-		14,705
Loans held-for-sale		105		105		-		-		105
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies		39,424		-		39,424		-		39,424
Other Investments		5,932		-		5,932		-		5,932
Investment in limited partnership		9,204		-		9,204		-		9,204
Accrued interest receivable		4,990		-		4,990		-		4,990

Financial liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	365,997	$	365,997	$	-	$	-	$	365,997
Interest-bearing		808,182		-		808,182		-		808,182
Fed funds purchased and repurchase agreements		5,974		-		5,974		-		5,974
Short-term borrowings		-		-		-		-		-
Long-term borrowings		-		-		-		-		-
Subordinated debentures		30,928		-		11,175		-		11,175
Limited partnership capital commitment		962		-		962		-		962
Accrued interest payable		186		-		186		-		186

		Notional Amount
Off-balance-sheet financial instruments:
Commitments to extend credit	$	420,707
Standby letters of credit		8,703
Commercial lines of credit		8,070

For financial asset categories that were actually reported at fair value at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company used the following methods and significant assumptions:

Foreclosed assets: Repossessed real estate (OREO) and other foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Fair value is the appraised value less expected selling costs for OREO and some other assets such as mobile homes, and for any other foreclosed assets fair value is represented by the estimated sales proceeds as determined using reasonably available sources. Foreclosed assets for which appraisals can be feasibly obtained are periodically measured for impairment using updated appraisals. Fair values for other foreclosed assets are adjusted as necessary, subsequent to a periodic re-evaluation of expected cash flows and the timing of resolution. If impairment is determined to exist, the book value of a foreclosed asset is immediately written down to its estimated impaired value through the income statement, thus the carrying amount is equal to the fair value and there is no valuation allowance.

Assets reported at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

Fair Value Measurements - Recurring
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2014, using

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Investment securities
US Government agencies	$	-	$	4,672	$	-	$	4,672
Mortgage-backed securities		-		354,186		-		354,186
State and poltical subdivisions		-		98,399		-		98,399
Equity securities		2,487		-		-		2,487

Total available-for-sale securities	$	2,487	$	457,257	$	-	$	459,744

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013, using

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Investment securities
US Government agencies	$	-	$	5,304	$	-	$	5,304
Mortgage-backed securities		-		320,721		-		320,721
State and poltical subdivisions		-		96,563		-		96,563
Equity securities		2,456		-		-		2,456

Total available-for-sale securities	$	2,456	$	422,588	$	-	$	425,044

Assets reported at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:

Fair Value Measurements - Nonrecurring
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2014, Using

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Collateral dependent impaired loans	$	-	$	19,944	$	-	$	19,944
Foreclosed assets	$	-	$	4,498	$	-	$	4,498

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013, using

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Collateral dependent impaired loans	$	-	$	14,705	$	-	$	14,705
Foreclosed assets	$	-	$	8,185	$	-	$	8,185

The table above includes collateral-dependent impaired loan balances for which a specific reserve has been established or on which a write-down has been taken. Information on the Company’s total impaired loan balances, and specific loss reserves associated with those balances, is included in Note 11 below, and in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in the “Nonperforming Assets” and “Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” sections.

The unobservable inputs are based on management’s best estimates of appropriate discounts in arriving at fair market value. Increases or decreases in any of those inputs could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. For example, a change in either direction of actual loss rates would have a directionally opposite change in the calculation of the fair value of unsecured impaired loans.

Note 10 – Investments

Although the Company currently has the intent and the ability to hold the securities in its investment portfolio to maturity, the securities are all marketable and are classified as “available for sale” to allow maximum flexibility with regard to interest rate risk and liquidity management. Pursuant to FASB’s guidance on accounting for debt and equity securities, available for sale securities are carried on the Company’s financial statements at their estimated fair market values, with monthly tax-effected “mark-to-market” adjustments made vis-à-vis accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

The table below summarizes the Company’s available-for-sale investment securities by type, as of the dates indicated:

Amortized Cost And Estimated Fair Value
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
	June 30, 2014
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value

US Government agencies	$	4,743	$	7	$	(78	)	$	4,672
Mortgage-backed securities		351,139		4,411		(1,364	)		354,186
State and poltical subdivisions		96,592		2,623		(816	)		98,399
Equity securities		1,336		1,151		-			2,487
Total investment securities	$	453,810	$	8,192	$	(2,258	)	$	459,744

	December 31, 2013
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value

US Government agencies	$	5,395	$	18	$	(109	)	$	5,304
Mortgage-backed securities		320,223		3,269		(2,771	)		320,721
State and political subdivisons		97,361		1,723		(2,521	)		96,563
Equity securities		1,336		1,120		-			2,456
Total investment securities	$	424,315	$	6,130	$	(5,401	)	$	425,044

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had 158 securities and 197 securities, respectively, with unrealized losses. Management has evaluated those securities as of the respective dates, and does not believe that any of the associated unrealized losses are other than temporary. Information pertaining to our investment securities with unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, is disclosed in the table below.

Investment Portfolio - Unrealized Losses
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)	June 30, 2014
	Less than Twelve Months					Over Twelve Months
	Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value

US Government agencies	$	(20	)	$	1,707	$	(58	)	$	2,332
Mortgage-backed securities		(338	)		60,577		(1,026	)		72,589
State and political subdivisions		(44	)		5,929		(772	)		26,249
Other securities		-			-		-			-
Total investment securities	$	(402	)	$	68,213	$	(1,856	)	$	101,170

	December 31, 2013
	Less than Twelve Months					Over Twelve Months
	Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value


US Government agencies	$	(92	)	$	1,913	$	(17	)	$	1,920
Mortgage-backed securities		(642	)		21,747		(2,129	)		124,317
State and political subdivisions		(461	)		6,799		(2,060	)		38,083
Other securities		-			-		-			-
Total investment securities	$	(1,195	)	$	30,459	$	(4,206	)	$	164,320

The table below summarizes the Company’s gross realized gains and losses as well as gross proceeds from the sales of securities:

Investment Portfolio - Realized Gains/(Losses)
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)

	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013		2014			2013

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale	$	4,995		$	-	$	8,360		$	264

Gross gains on sale of securities available for sale	$	185		$	-	$	289		$	6
Gross losses on sale of securities available for sale		(2	)		-		(2	)		-
Net gains on sale of securities available for sale	$	183		$	-	$	287		$	6

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contraction maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.

Estimated Fair Value of Contractual Maturities
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)	June 30, 2014
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value


Maturing within one year	$	3,062	$	3,077
Maturing after one year through five years		222,327		225,395
Maturing after five years through ten years		64,030		65,120
Maturing after ten years		51,477		51,642


Investment securities not due at a single maturity date:
U.S Government agencies collateralized by
mortgage obligations		111,578		112,024
Other securities		1,336		2,486
	$	453,810	$	459,744

	December 31, 2013
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value


Maturing within one year	$	2,294	$	2,316
Maturing after one year through five years		241,396		242,493
Maturing after five years through ten years		59,572		59,402
Maturing after ten years		49,674		47,737


Investment securities not due at a single maturity date:
U.S Government agencies collateralized by
mortgage obligations		70,043		70,640
Other securities		1,336		2,456
	$	424,315	$	425,044

At June 30, 2014, the Company’s investment portfolio included securities issued by 246 different government municipalities and agencies located within 27 states with a fair value of $98.4 million. The largest exposure to any single municipality or agency was a $4.5 million (fair value) bond issued for water utility improvements by the Arizona State Water Infrastructure Finance Authority, to be repaid by future water revenue.

The Company’s investments in bonds issued by states, municipalities and political subdivisions are evaluated in accordance with Supervision and Regulation Letter 12-15 (SR 12-15) issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, “Investing in Securities without Reliance on Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization Ratings”, and other regulatory guidance. Credit ratings are considered in our analysis only as a guide to the historical default rate associated with similarly-rated bonds. There have been no significant differences in our internal analyses compared with the ratings assigned by the third party credit rating agencies.

The following table summarizes the total general obligation and revenue bonds in the Company’s investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2014, including the state in which the issuing government municipality or agency operates when such state represents an investment concentration:

Revenue and General Obligation Bonds by Location
dollars in thousands, unaudited	June 30, 2014				December 31, 2013

	Amortized		Fair Market		Amortized		Fair Market
General obligation bonds	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
State of issuance
California	$	22,103	$	23,139	$	20,638	$	21,272
Texas		12,450		12,496		11,340		11,024
Illinois		8,301		8,333		8,965		8,702
Ohio		7,646		7,669		7,659		7,485
Washington		5,997		6,087		5,487		5,340
Arizona		2,085		2,145		2,100		2,050
Other states		19,663		20,014		20,666		20,429
Total General Obligation Bonds		78,245		79,883		76,855		76,302

Revenue bonds
State of issuance
Arizona		4,645		4,482		4,700		4,341
Texas		3,294		3,362		2,762		2,719
California		2,169		2,235		2,519		2,579
Washington		1,169		1,206		1,170		1,211
Ohio		323		337		324		339
Other states		6,747		6,894		6,758		6,742
Total Revenue Bonds		18,347		18,516		18,233		17,931

Certificates of participation (All California)		-		-		2,273		2,330

Total Obligations of States
and Political Subdivisions	$	96,592	$	98,399	$	97,361	$	96,563

At June 30, 2014, the revenue bonds in the Company’s investment securities portfolios were issued by government municipalities and agencies to fund public services such as utilities (water, sewer, and power), educational facilities, and general public and economic improvements. The revenue bonds were payable from 12 different types of revenue sources. The revenue sources that represent 5% or more individually as a percent of the total revenue bonds are summarized in the following table:

Revenue Bonds by Type
dollars in thousands, unaudited	June 30, 2014				December 31, 2013

	Amortized		Fair Market		Amortized		Fair Market
Revenue bonds	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Revenue source:
Water	$	7,350	$	7,295	$	7,409	$	7,144
College & University		2,739		2,812		2,203		2,187
Electric & Power		1,884		1,919		1,888		1,895
Sales Tax		1,673		1,713		1,673		1,688
Lease		1,356		1,337		1,155		1,063
Other sources		3,345		3,440		3,905		3,954
Total Revenue Bonds	$	18,347	$	18,516	$	18,233	$	17,931

Note 11 – Credit Quality and Nonperforming Assets

Credit Quality Classifications

The Company monitors the credit quality of loans on a continuous basis using the regulatory and accounting classifications of pass, special mention, substandard and impaired to characterize the associated credit risk. Balances classified as “loss” are immediately charged off. The Company conforms to the following definitions for risk classifications utilized:

Pass: Larger non-homogeneous loans not meeting the risk rating definitions below, and smaller homogeneous loans that are not assessed on an individual basis.

Special mention: Loans which have potential issues that deserve the close attention of management. If left uncorrected, those potential weaknesses could eventually diminish the prospects for full repayment of principal and interest according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, or could result in deterioration of the Company’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard: Loans that have at least one clear and well-defined weakness which could jeopardize the ultimate recoverability of all principal and interest, such as a borrower displaying a highly leveraged position, unfavorable financial operating results and/or trends, uncertain repayment sources or a deteriorated financial condition.

Impaired: A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans include all nonperforming loans, restructured troubled debt (TDRs), and certain other loans that are still being maintained on accrual status. A TDR may be nonperforming or performing, depending on its accrual status and the demonstrated ability of the borrower to comply with restructured terms (see “Troubled Debt Restructurings” section below for additional information on TDRs).

Credit quality classifications for the Company’s loan balances were as follows, as of the dates indicated:

Credit Quality Classifications
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
	June 30, 2014
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Impaired		Total

Real Estate:
1-4 family residential construction	$	4,120	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	4,120
Other construction/land		17,967		299		10		4,878		23,154
1-4 family - closed end		97,789		927		609		14,535		113,860
Equity lines		47,591		213		1,250		2,268		51,322
Multi-family residential		6,565		423		-		-		6,988
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		177,779		21,534		3,635		4,708		207,656
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied		89,255		3,575		228		12,945		106,003
Farmland		122,982		2,459		79		173		125,693
Total real estate		564,048		29,430		5,811		39,507		638,796

Agricultural		24,812		646		357		327		26,142
Commercial and Iindustrial		95,907		1,900		289		3,252		101,348
Mortgage Warehouse		106,157		-		-		-		106,157
Consumer loans		17,018		416		113		3,051		20,598
Total gross loans and leases	$	807,942	$	32,392	$	6,570	$	46,137	$	893,041

	December 31, 2013
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Impaired		Total

Real Estate:
1-4 family residential construction	$	1,720	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,720
Other construction/land		18,243		334		203		6,751		25,531
1-4 family - closed end		67,051		1,305		770		17,898		87,024
Equity lines		51,019		254		1,429		1,021		53,723
Multi-family residential		8,059		426		-		-		8,485
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		158,155		17,033		3,261		7,563		186,012
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied		89,475		3,630		240		13,495		106,840
Farmland		105,623		1,780		819		282		108,504
Total real estate		499,345		24,762		6,722		47,010		577,839

Agricultural		24,178		532		-		470		25,180
Commercial and industrial		93,224		3,358		1,236		5,444		103,262
Mortgage Warehouse		73,425		-		-		-		73,425
Consumer loans		19,387		478		208		3,463		23,536
Total gross loans and leases	$	709,559	$	29,130	$	8,166	$	56,387	$	803,242

Past Due and Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets are comprised of loans for which the Company is no longer accruing interest, and foreclosed assets, including mobile homes and other real estate owned (OREO). OREO consists of properties acquired by foreclosure or similar means, which the Company is offering or will offer for sale. Nonperforming loans and leases result when reasonable doubt surfaces with regard to the ability of the Company to collect all principal and interest. At that point, we stop accruing interest on the loan or lease in question and reverse any previously-recognized interest to the extent that it is uncollected or associated with interest-reserve loans. Any asset for which principal or interest has been in default for 90 days or more is also placed on non-accrual status even if interest is still being received, unless the asset is both well secured and in the process of collection. An aging of the Company’s loan balances is presented in the following tables, by number of days past due as of the indicated dates:

Loan Portfolio Aging
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
	June 30, 2014
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days Or More Past Due⁽²⁾		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Non-Accrual Loans⁽¹⁾

Real Estate:
1-4 family residential construction	$	-	$	7	$	-	$	7	$	4,113	$	4,120	$	-
Other construction/land		-		3,682		-		3,682		19,472		23,154		3,682
1-4 family - closed end		125		2,707		-		2,832		111,028		113,860		10,071
Equity lines		6		86		838		930		50,392		51,322		1,997
Multi-family residential		-		-		-		-		6,988		6,988		-
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		218		362		1,640		2,220		205,436		207,656		3,485
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied		834		202		6,842		7,878		98,125		106,003		7,671
Farmland		937		-		-		937		124,756		125,693		173
Total real estate		2,120		7,046		9,320		18,486		620,310		638,796		27,079

Agricultural		159		358		327		844		25,298		26,142		327
Commercial and industrial		399		-		401		800		100,548		101,348		992
Mortgage Warehouse		-		-		-		-		106,157		106,157		-
Consumer loans		212		-		39		251		20,347		20,598		838
Total gross loans and leases	$	2,890	$	7,404	$	10,087	$	20,381	$	872,660	$	893,041	$	29,236

⁽¹⁾ Included in total financing receivables

⁽²⁾ As of June 30, 2014 there were no loans over 90 days past due and still acrruing.

	December 31, 2013
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days Or More Past Due⁽²⁾		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Non-Accrual Loans⁽¹⁾

Real Estate:
1-4 family residential construction	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,720	$	1,720	$	-
Other construction/land		294		-		116		410		25,121		25,531		5,528
1-4 family - closed end		2,181		300		171		2,652		84,372		87,024		13,168
Equity lines		98		-		288		386		53,337		53,723		778
Multi-family residential		-		-		-		-		8,485		8,485		-
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		1,917		144		2,011		4,072		181,940		186,012		5,516
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied		-		-		7,667		7,667		99,173		106,840		8,058
Farmland		331		-		-		331		108,173		108,504		282
Total real estate		4,821		444		10,253		15,518		562,321		577,839		33,330

Agricultural		892		327		125		1,344		23,836		25,180		470
Commercial and industrial		1,318		587		1,298		3,203		100,059		103,262		2,622
Mortgage Warehouse		-		-		-		-		73,425		73,425		-
Consumer loans		181		-		-		181		23,355		23,536		992
Total gross loans and leases	$	7,212	$	1,358	$	11,676	$	20,246	$	782,996	$	803,242	$	37,414

⁽¹⁾ Included in total financing receivables

⁽²⁾ As of December 31, 2013 there were no loans over 90 days past due and still accruing.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

A loan that is modified for a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulty is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR), if the modification constitutes a concession. At June 30, 2014, the Company had a total of $34.6 million in TDRs, including $21.4 million in TDRs that were on non-accrual status. Generally, a non-accrual loan that has been modified as a TDR remains on non-accrual status for a period of at least six months to demonstrate the borrower’s ability to comply with the modified terms. However, performance prior to the modification, or significant events that coincide with the modification, could result in a loan’s return to accrual status after a shorter performance period or even at the time of loan modification. TDRs may have the TDR designation removed in the calendar year following the restructuring, if the loan is in compliance with all modified terms and is yielding a market rate of interest. Regardless of the period of time that has elapsed, if the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is uncertain then the loan will be kept on non-accrual status. Moreover, a TDR is generally considered to be in default when it appears that the customer will not likely be able to repay all principal and interest pursuant to the terms of the restructured agreement.

The Company may agree to different types of concessions when modifying a loan or lease. The tables below summarize TDRs which were modified during the noted periods, by type of concession:

Troubled Debt Restructurings, by Type of Loan Modification
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
	For the six months Ended Ended June 30, 2014

	Rate Modification		Term Modification		Interest Only Modification		Rate & Term Modification		Rate & Interest Only Modification		Term & Interest Only Modification		Rate, Term & Interest Only Modification		Total

Real estate:
Other construction/land	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
1-4 family - closed-end		-		13		-		-		-		-		-		13
Equity lines		-		321		-		29		-		-		-		350
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		279		123		-		-		-		-		-		402
Total real estate loans		279		457		-		29		-		-		-		765
Commercial and industrial		-		133		-		4		-		30		-		167
Consumer loans		-		9		-		-		-		-		-		9
	$	279	$	599	$	-	$	33	$	-	$	30	$	-	$	941

	For the year ended December 31, 2013
	Rate Modification		Term Modification		Interest Only Modification		Rate & Term Modification		Rate & Interest Only Modification		Term & Interest Only Modification		Rate, Term & Interest Only Modification		Total

Real Estate:
Other construction/land	$	-	$	416	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	416
1-4 family - closed-end		-		3,338		-		238		-		-		102		3,678
Equity lines		-		-		40		-		-		-		-		40
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		-		-		-		557		-		-		-		557
Total real estate loans		-		3,754		40		795		-		-		102		4,691
Commercial and industrial		-		1,563		-		308		-		-		-		1,871
Consumer loans		-		469		-		-		-		-		92		561
	$	-	$	5,786	$	40	$	1,103	$	-	$	-	$	194	$	7,123

The following tables present, by class, additional details related to loans classified as TDRs during the referenced periods, including the recorded investment in the loan both before and after modification and balances that were modified during the period:

Troubled Debt Restructurings
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
	For the three months Ended June 30, 2014

			Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
	Number of Loans		Outstanding Recorded Investment		Outstanding Recorded Investment		Reserve Difference⁽¹⁾		Reserve

Real Estate:
Other Construction/Land		-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
1-4 family - closed-end		-		-		-		-		-
Equity Lines		3		350		350		169		205
Commercial RE- owner occupied		1		279		279		-		139
Total Real Estate Loans				629		629		169		344

Commercial and Industrial		2		53		53		29		33
Consumer loans		2		7		7		1		2
			$	689	$	689	$	199	$	379

⁽¹⁾This represents the change in the ALLL reserve for these credits measured as the difference between the specific post-modification impairment reserve and the pre-modification reserve calculated under our general allowance for loan loss methodology.


	For the six months Ended June 30, 2014

			Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
	Number of Loans		Outstanding Recorded Investment		Outstanding Recorded Investment		Reserve Difference⁽¹⁾		Reserve

Real Estate:
Other Construction/Land		-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
1-4 family - closed-end		1		13		13		-		-
Equity Lines		3		350		350		169		203
Commercial RE- owner occupied		2		402		402		-		141
Total Real Estate Loans				765		765		169		344

Commercial and Industrial		5		167		167		52		43
Consumer loans		3		9		9		1		2
			$	941	$	941	$	222	$	389

⁽¹⁾ This represents the change in the ALLL reserve for these credits measured as the difference between the specific post-modification impairment reserve and the pre-modification reserve calculated under our general allowancefor loan loss methodology.

The tables below summarize TDRs that defaulted during the periods noted, and any charge-offs on those TDRs resulting from such default.

Troubled Debt Restructurings
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
	Subsequent default three months ended June 30, 2014
	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Charge-Offs

Real Estate:
Other Construction/Land		3	$	1,546	$	-
1-4 family - closed-end		2		8,305		-
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		1		222		31
Total Real Estate Loans				10,073		31
Commercial and Industrial		-		-		-
Consumer Loans		-		-		-
			$	10,073	$	31

	Subsequent default six months ended June 30, 2014

	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Charge-Offs
Real Estate:
Other Construction/Land		3	$	1,546	$	-
1-4 family - closed-end		2		8,305		-
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		1		222		31
Total Real Estate Loans				10,073		31
Commercial and Industrial		1		127		-
Consumer Loans		2		133		58
			$	10,333	$	89

Note 12 – Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses, a contra-asset, is established through a provision for loan and lease losses. The allowance is maintained at a level that is considered adequate to absorb probable losses on certain specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred losses inherent in the remaining loan portfolio. Specifically identifiable and quantifiable losses are immediately charged off against the allowance; recoveries are generally recorded only when cash payments are received subsequent to the charge off. We employ a systematic methodology, consistent with FASB guidelines on loss contingencies and impaired loans, for determining the appropriate level of the allowance for loan and lease losses and adjusting it at least quarterly. Pursuant to that methodology, impaired loans and leases are individually analyzed and a criticized asset action plan is completed specifying the financial status of the borrower and, if applicable, the characteristics and condition of collateral and any associated liquidation plan. A specific loss allowance is created for each impaired loan, if necessary.

The following tables disclose the unpaid principal balance, recorded investment (including accrued interest), average recorded investment, and interest income recognized for impaired loans on our books as of the dates indicated. Balances are shown by loan type, and are further broken out by those that required an allowance and those that did not, with the associated allowance disclosed for those that required such. Included in the valuation allowance for impaired loans shown in the tables below are specific reserves allocated to TDRs, totaling $3.878 million at June 30, 2014 and $3.321 million at December 31, 2013.

Impaired Loans	June 30, 2014
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)	Unpaid Principal Balance⁽¹⁾		Recorded Investment⁽²⁾		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized⁽³⁾


With an allowance recorded
Real Estate:
1-4 family residential construction	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Other construction/land		2,904		2,903		434		3,092		47
1-4 Family - closed-end		11,055		11,055		1,214		11,918		135
Equity lines		1,867		1,702		450		1,918		6
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		2,665		2,555		1,259		2,790		26
Commercial real estate- non-owner occupied		10,423		10,424		1,079		10,896		148
Farmland		-		-		-		-		-
Total real estate		28,914		28,639		4,436		30,614		362
Agriculture		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial and industrial		3,197		3,184		807		3,185		61
Consumer loans		2,929		2,927		336		3,131		81
		35,040		34,750		5,579		36,930		504
With no related allowance recorded
Real estate:
1-4 family residential construction		-		-		-		-		-
Other construction/land		2,033		1,975		-		2,409		-
1-4 family - closed-end		3,637		3,480		-		4,339		-
Equity lines		746		566		-		759		-
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		3,483		2,153		-		3,773		-
Commercial real estate- non-owner occupied		2,669		2,521		-		2,790		58
Farmland		173		173		-		203		-
Total real estate		12,741		10,868		-		14,273		58
Agriculture		327		327		-		336		-
Commercial and industrial		93		68		-		123		-
Consumer loans		401		124		-		528		-
		13,562		11,387		-		15,260		58
Total	$	48,602	$	46,137	$	5,579	$	52,190	$	562

⁽¹⁾ Contractual principal balance due from customer.

⁽²⁾ Principal balance on Company's books, less any direct charge offs.

⁽³⁾ Interest income is recognized on performing balances on a regular accrual basis.

	December 31, 2013
	Unpaid Principal Balance⁽¹⁾		Recorded Investment⁽²⁾		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized⁽³⁾


With an allowance recorded
Real estate:
1-4 family residential construction	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Other construction/land		2,972		2,972		502		3,000		98
1-4 family - closed-end		13,522		13,522		1,324		13,630		260
Equity lines		528		528		123		530		13
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		2,047		2,047		217		2,069		135
Commercial real estate- non-owner occupied		3,715		3,715		701		3,813		238
Farmland		-		-		-		-		-
Total real estate		22,784		22,784		2,867		23,042		744
Agriculture		125		125		126		131		-
Commercial and industrial		4,580		4,345		1,925		4,496		131
Consumer loans		3,411		3,411		431		3,591		172
		30,900		30,665		5,349		31,260		1,047
With no related allowance recorded
Real estate:
1-4 family residential construction		-		-		-		-		-
Other construction/land		4,176		3,779		-		3,885		-
1-4 family - closed-end		4,655		4,376		-		4,687		1
Equity lines		565		493		-		493		-
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		7,436		5,516		-		5,568		-
Commercial real estate- non-owner occupied		10,077		9,780		-		9,820		115
Farmland		282		282		-		290		-
Total real estate		27,191		24,226		-		24,743		116
Agriculture		345		345		-		837		-
Commercial and industrial		1,249		1,099		-		1,607		57
Consumer loans		241		52		-		77		-
		29,026		25,722		-		27,264		173
Total	$	59,926	$	56,387	$	5,349	$	58,524	$	1,220

⁽¹⁾ Contractual principal balance due from customer.

⁽²⁾ Principal balance on Company's books, less any direct charge offs.

⁽³⁾ Interest income is recognized on performing balances on a regular accrual basis.

The specific loss allowance for an impaired loan generally represents the difference between the face value of the loan and either the fair value of underlying collateral less estimated disposition costs, or the loan’s net present value as determined by a discounted cash flow analysis. The discounted cash flow approach is typically used to measure impairment on loans for which it is anticipated that repayment will be provided from cash flows other than those generated solely by the disposition or operation of underlying collateral. However, historical loss rates may be used to determine a specific loss allowance if they indicate a higher potential reserve need than the discounted cash flow analysis. Any change in impairment attributable to the passage of time is accommodated by adjusting the loss allowance accordingly.

For loans where repayment is expected to be provided by the disposition or operation of the underlying collateral, impairment is measured using the fair value of the collateral. If the collateral value, net of the expected costs of disposition where applicable, is less than the loan balance, then a specific loss reserve is established for the shortfall in collateral coverage. If the discounted collateral value is greater than or equal to the loan balance, no specific loss reserve is required. At the time a collateral-dependent loan is designated as nonperforming, a new appraisal is ordered and typically received within 30 to 60 days if a recent appraisal is not already available. We generally use external appraisals to determine the fair value of the underlying collateral for nonperforming real estate loans, although the Company’s licensed staff appraisers may update older appraisals based on current market conditions and property value trends. Until an updated appraisal is received, the Company uses the existing appraisal to determine the amount of the specific loss allowance that may be required, and adjusts the specific loss allowance, as necessary, once a new appraisal is received. Updated appraisals are generally ordered at least annually for collateral-dependent loans that remain impaired. Current appraisals were available for 70% of the Company’s impaired real estate loan balances at June 30, 2014. Furthermore, the Company analyzes collateral-dependent loans on at least a quarterly basis, to determine if any portion of the recorded investment in such loans can be identified as uncollectible and would therefore constitute a confirmed loss. All amounts deemed to be uncollectible are promptly charged off against the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses, with the loan then carried at the fair value of the collateral, as appraised, less estimated costs of disposition if applicable. Once a charge-off or write-down is recorded, it will not be restored to the loan balance on the Company’s accounting books.

Our methodology also provides that a “general” allowance be established for probable incurred losses inherent in loans and leases that are not impaired. Unimpaired loan balances are segregated by credit quality, and are then evaluated in pools with common characteristics. At the present time, pools are based on the same segmentation of loan types presented in our regulatory filings. While this methodology utilizes historical loss data and other measurable information, the classification of loans and the establishment of the allowance for loan and lease losses are both to some extent based on management’s judgment and experience. Our methodology incorporates a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative, in establishing an allowance for loan and lease losses that management believes is appropriate at each reporting date. Quantitative information includes our historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, and current collateral values. Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in our markets and, in particular, the condition of the agricultural industry and other key industries in the Central San Joaquin Valley. Lending policies and procedures (including underwriting standards), the experience and abilities of lending staff, the quality of loan review, credit concentrations (by geography, loan type, industry and collateral type), the rate of loan portfolio growth, and changes in legal or regulatory requirements are additional factors that are considered. The total general reserve established for probable incurred losses on unimpaired loans was $6.055 million at June 30, 2014.

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, there were no material changes to the methodology used to determine our allowance for loan and lease losses. As we add new products and expand our geographic coverage, and as the economic environment changes, we expect to continue to enhance our methodology to keep pace with the size and complexity of the loan and lease portfolio and respond to pressures created by external forces. We engage outside firms on a regular basis to assess our methodology and perform independent credit reviews of our loan and lease portfolio. In addition, the Company’s external auditors, the FDIC, and the California DBO review the allowance for loan and lease losses as an integral part of their audit and examination processes. Management believes that the current methodology is appropriate given our size and level of complexity.

The tables that follow detail the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the periods noted:

Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
	Real Estate			Agricultural		Commercial and Industrial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total

Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	7,396		$	847	$	1,418		$	1,438		$	392		$	11,491
Charge-offs		(307	)		-		(226	)		(564	)		-			(1,097	)
Recoveries		892			1		54			93			-			1,040
Provision		(703	)		505		270			496			(368	)		200

Ending Balance	$	7,278		$	1,353	$	1,516		$	1,463		$	24		$	11,634

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
	Real Estate			Agricultural			Commercial and Industrial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total

Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	5,544		$	978		$	3,787		$	1,117		$	251		$	11,677
Charge-offs		(434	)		(124	)		(412	)		(985	)		-			(1,955	)
Recoveries		1,199			2			98			263			-			1,562
Provision		969			497			(1,957	)		1,068			(227	)		350

Ending Balance	$	7,278		$	1,353		$	1,516		$	1,463		$	24		$	11,634

Reserves:
Specific	$	4,436		$	-		$	807		$	336		$	-		$	5,579
General		2,842			1,353			709			1,127		$	24			6,055

Ending Balance	$	7,278		$	1,353		$	1,516		$	1,463		$	24		$	11,634

Loans evaluated for impairment:
Individually	$	39,507		$	327		$	3,252		$	3,051		$	-		$	46,137
Collectively		599,289			25,815			204,253			17,547			-			846,904

Ending Balance	$	638,796		$	26,142		$	207,505		$	20,598		$	-		$	893,041

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
	Real Estate			Agricultural			Commercial and Industrial			Consumer			Unallocated		Total

Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	8,034		$	258		$	3,467		$	2,114		$	-	$	13,873
Charge-offs		(4,205	)		(473	)		(1,668	)		(1,917	)		-		(8,263	)
Recoveries		618			-			802			297			-		1,717
Provision		1,097			1,193			1,186			623			251		4,350

Ending balance	$	5,544		$	978		$	3,787		$	1,117		$	251	$	11,677

Reserves:
Specific	$	2,867		$	126		$	1,925		$	431				$	5,349
General		2,677			852			1,862			686			251		6,328

Ending balance	$	5,544		$	978		$	3,787		$	1,117		$	251	$	11,677

Loans evaluated for impairment:
Individually	$	47,010		$	470		$	5,444		$	3,463		$	-	$	56,387
Collectively		530,829			24,710			171,243			20,073			-		746,855

Ending balance	$	577,839		$	25,180		$	176,687		$	23,536		$	-	$	803,242

Note 13 – Recent Developments

On July 17, 2014 the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Santa Clara Valley Bank (OTC: SCVE) of Santa Paula, California, a community bank with approximately $125 million in assets and branches located in Santa Paula, Santa Clarita, and Fillmore, California. The agreement calls for the payment of cash consideration of $12.3 million, or $6.00 per share, to SCVE’s common shareholders and cash consideration of $3.0 million to SCVE’s preferred shareholders to retire outstanding preferred stock and associated warrants. Included in the $12.3 million payment is $700,000 that the Company will pay to cash out existing in-the-money warrants. The transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions including required regulatory approvals and approval by the shareholders of Santa Clara Valley Bank, is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2014.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND

ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, and “estimates” or variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, forecast in, or implied by such forward-looking statements.

A variety of factors could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations, and should be considered when evaluating the Company’s potential future financial performance. They include, but are not limited to, unfavorable economic conditions in the Company’s service areas; risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates; liquidity risks; increases in nonperforming assets and net credit losses that could occur, particularly in times of weak economic conditions or rising interest rates; the Company’s ability to secure buyers for foreclosed properties; reductions in the market value of available-for-sale securities that could result if interest rates change substantially or an issuer has real or perceived financial difficulties; the Company’s ability to attract and retain skilled employees; the Company’s ability to successfully deploy new technology; the success of branch expansion; and risks associated with the multitude of current and prospective laws and regulations to which the Company is and will be subject.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The financial information and disclosures contained within those statements are significantly impacted by management’s estimates and judgments, which are based on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under current circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates under divergent conditions.

Critical accounting policies are those that involve the most complex and subjective decisions and assessments, and have the greatest potential impact on the Company’s stated results of operations. In management’s opinion, the Company’s critical accounting policies deal with the following areas: the establishment of the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses, as explained in detail in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements and the “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” and “Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” sections of this discussion and analysis; the valuation of impaired loans and foreclosed assets, which is discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements and in the “Nonperforming Assets” and “Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” sections of this discussion and analysis; income taxes, especially with regard to the ability of the Company to recover deferred tax assets, as discussed in the “Provision for Income Taxes” and “Other Assets” sections of this discussion and analysis; and goodwill, which is evaluated annually for impairment based on the fair value of the Company as discussed in the “Other Assets” section of this discussion and analysis. Critical accounting areas are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure that the Company’s financial statements incorporate the most recent expectations with regard to those areas.

OVERVIEW OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

results of operations Summary

Second Quarter 2014 compared to Second Quarter 2013

Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was $4.237 million, representing an increase of $438,000, or 12%, relative to net income of $3.799 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2014 were $0.30, compared to $0.27 for the second quarter of 2013. The Company’s annualized return on average equity was 9.13% and annualized return on average assets was 1.16% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared to 8.62% and 1.09%, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The primary drivers behind the quarter over quarter variance in net income are as follows:

Net interest income increased $675,000, or 5%, due primarily to an $82 million increase in average interest-earning assets and a higher level of non-recurring interest income, partially offset by net interest margin compression.

Gains on securities totaled $183,000 in the second quarter of 2014, relative to no gains in the second quarter of 2013.

Service charges on deposits fell by $176,000 for the comparative quarters.

The loan loss provision was reduced by $250,000, or 56%.

Total non-interest expense increased $291,000, or 3%, primarily due to costs associated with our new core banking software that was implemented in February 2014.

First Half 2014 compared to First Half 2013

Net income for the first half of 2014 was $8.036 million, representing an increase of $1.904 million, or 31%, relative to net income of $6.132 million for the first half of 2013. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the first half of 2014 were $0.57 and $0.56, respectively, compared to $0.43 basic and diluted earnings per share for the first half of 2013. The Company’s annualized return on average equity was 8.75% and annualized return on average assets was 1.12% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to a return on equity of 7.03% and return on assets of 0.89% for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The primary drivers behind the variance in year-to-date net income are as follows:

The single largest impact on the comparative year-to-date results came from a reduction of $1.700 million, or 83%, in the loan loss provision.

Net interest income increased $1.048 million, or 4%, due to a $58 million increase in average interest-earning assets and a higher level of non-recurring interest income.

Total non-interest income declined by $413,000, or 5%, in the first half of 2014 due to a drop in service charges on deposits, lower BOLI income, and a $100,000 non-recurring signing incentive received in conjunction with our conversion of merchant processing to a new vendor in the first quarter of 2013, partially offset by an increase in gains realized on the sale of investment securities.

Total non-interest expense fell by $802,000, or 4%, as higher marketing, data processing, and deposit costs were more than offset by a reduction of $1.178 million in net costs associated with foreclosed assets.

The Company’s provision for income taxes was 26% of pre-tax income for the first half of 2014, relative to 20% for the first half of 2013.

Financial Condition Summary

June 30, 2014 relative to December 31, 2013

The most significant characteristics of, and changes in, the Company’s balance sheet during the first six months of 2014 are outlined below:

The Company’s assets totaled $1.498 billion at June 30, 2014, an increase of $88 million, or 6%, relative to total assets of $1.410 billion at December 31, 2013 due to growth in loans and investments net of reductions in foreclosed assets and balances due from banks.

Gross loans increased by $90 million, or 11%, due to growth in mortgage warehouse loans, commercial real estate loans and real estate loans secured by farmland, in addition to the purchase of $33 million in residential mortgage loans in the first quarter of 2014.

Total nonperforming assets, comprised of nonperforming loans and foreclosed assets, were reduced by $12 million, or 26%, to $34 million at June 30, 2014 from $46 million at December 31, 2013.

Investment securities increased $35 million, or 8%, during the first half of 2014 but interest bearing balances held in our Federal Reserve Bank account were reduced by $23 million, or 85%, pursuant to our purchase of mortgage-backed securities as we deployed excess liquidity.

Total deposits reflect growth of $72 million, or 6%, during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Core non-maturity deposits were up $80 million, or 9%, although some of that increase appears to be seasonal.

Total capital increased by $5 million, or 3%, to $187 million at June 30, 2014, due primarily to an increase in retained earnings net of the impact of the Company’s repurchase of 270,100 shares in the first half of 2014. While still robust, our consolidated total risk-based capital ratio declined to 20.10% at June 30, 2014 from 21.67% at year-end 2013 due to growth in risk-adjusted assets. Our tier one risk-based capital ratio was 18.94% and our tier one leverage ratio was 13.87% at June 30, 2014.

EARNINGS PERFORMANCE

The Company earns income from two primary sources. The first is net interest income, which is interest income generated by earning assets less interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. The second is non-interest income, which consists mainly of customer service charges and fees but also comes from non-customer sources such as bank-owned life insurance. The majority of the Company’s non-interest expense is comprised of operating costs that relate to providing a full range of banking services to our customers.

Net interest income AND NET INTEREST MARGIN

In a reversal of recent adverse trends, net interest income increased by $675,000, or 5%, for the second quarter of 2014 relative to the second quarter of 2013, and by $1.048 million, or 4%, for the first half of 2014 compared to the first half of 2013. The level of net interest income recognized in any given period depends on a combination of factors including the average volume and yield for interest-earning assets, the average volume and cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and the mix of products which comprise the Company’s earning assets, deposits, and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is also impacted by the reversal of interest for loans placed on non-accrual status during the reporting period, and the recovery of interest on loans that had been on non-accrual and were paid off, sold or returned to accrual status.

The following tables show average balances for significant balance sheet categories, and the amount of interest income or interest expense associated with each applicable category for the noted periods. The tables also display the calculated yields on each major component of the Company’s investment and loan portfolios, the average rates paid on each key segment of the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities, and our net interest margin for the noted periods.

Average Balances and Rates	For the three months ended							For the three months ended
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Ended June 30, 2014							Ended June 30, 2013
	Average		Income/		Average Rate/			Average		Income/		Average Rate/
Assets		Balance ⁽¹⁾		Expense		Yield ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾			Balance ⁽¹⁾		Expense		Yield ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
Investments:
Federal funds sold/due from time	$	20,561	$	16		0.31	%	$	26,115	$	16		0.24	%
Taxable		356,280		1,876		2.08	%		314,191		1,034		1.30	%
Non-taxable		97,233		733		4.52	%		86,626		672		4.65	%
Equity		2,542		-		-			2,144		-		-
Total investments		476,616		2,625		2.49	%		429,076		1,722		1.91	%
Loans and Leases:⁽⁴⁾
Real estate		629,352		8,340		5.32	%		559,098		7,848		5.63	%
Agricultural		23,667		227		3.85	%		24,219		247		4.09	%
Commercial™		96,900		1,102		4.56	%		96,893		1,249		5.17	%
Consumer		21,643		477		8.84	%		25,744		540		8.41	%
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		84,305		868		4.13	%		114,736		1,440		5.03	%
Direct financing leases		2,402		32		5.34	%		3,133		44		5.63	%
Other		303		11		14.56	%		8		-		-
Total loans and leases		858,572		11,057		5.17	%		823,831		11,368		5.53	%
Total interest earning assets ⁽⁵⁾		1,335,188		13,682		4.22	%		1,252,907		13,090		4.30	%
Other earning assets		6,072							6,168
Non-earning assets		129,437							139,815
Total assets	$	1,470,697						$	1,398,890

Liabilities and shareholders' equity
Interest bearing deposits:
Demand deposits	$	112,800	$	72		0.26	%	$	87,828	$	77		0.35	%
NOW		247,667		86		0.14	%		194,194		95		0.20	%
Savings accounts		151,938		75		0.20	%		131,341		71		0.22	%
Money market		73,337		21		0.11	%		70,607		24		0.14	%
CDAR's		13,121		7		0.21	%		13,212		7		0.21	%
Certificates of deposit<$100,000		78,582		87		0.44	%		91,450		107		0.47	%
Certificates of deposit>$100,000		200,714		183		0.37	%		212,486		210		0.40	%
Brokered deposits		5,660		22		1.56	%		10,000		37		1.48	%
Total interest bearing deposits		883,819		553		0.25	%		811,118		628		0.31	%
Borrowed Funds:
Federal funds purchased		43		-		-			2		-		-
Repurchase agreements		5,539		4		0.29	%		2,020		3		0.60	%
Short term borrowings		738		-		-			12,058		5		0.17	%
Long term borrowings		-		-		-			-		-		-
TRUPS		30,928		175		2.27	%		30,928		179		2.32	%
Total borrowed funds		37,248		179		1.93	%		45,008		187		1.67	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		921,067		732		0.32	%		856,126		815		0.38	%
Demand deposits - non-interest bearing		345,110							346,866
Other liabilities		18,402							19,129
Shareholders' equity		186,118							176,769
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,470,697						$	1,398,890

Interest income/interest earning assets						4.22	%						4.30	%
Interest expense/interest earning assets						0.22	%						0.26	%
Net interest income and margin⁽⁶⁾			$	12,950		4.00	%			$	12,275		4.04	%

⁽¹⁾

Average balances are obtained from the best available daily or monthly data and are net of deferred fees and related direct costs.

⁽²⁾

Yields and net interest margin have been computed on a tax equivalent basis utilizing a 34% effective tax rate.

⁽³⁾

Annualized

⁽⁴⁾

Loan costs have been included in the calculation of interest income. Loan costs were approximately $(197) thousand and $(29) thousand for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Loans are gross of the allowance for possible loan losses.

⁽⁵⁾

Non-accrual loans have been included in total loans for purposes of total earning assets.

⁽⁶⁾

Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

Average Balances and Rates	For the six months ended							For the six months ended
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Ended June 30, 2014							Ended June 30, 2013
	Average		Income/		Average Rate/			Average		Income/		Average Rate/
Assets		Balance ⁽¹⁾		Expense		Yield ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾			Balance ⁽¹⁾		Expense		Yield ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
Investments:
Federal funds sold/Due from time	$	39,466	$	51		0.26	%	$	35,634	$	44		0.25	%
Taxable		346,215		3,701		2.13	%		312,642		2,179		1.39	%
Non-taxable		96,874		1,474		4.59	%		81,593		1,291		4.77	%
Equity		2,528		-		-			2,041		17		1.66	%
Total Investments		485,083		5,226		2.45	%		431,910		3,531		1.93	%
Loans and Leases:⁽⁴⁾
Real Estate		606,825		16,222		5.39	%		552,402		15,323		5.59	%
Agricultural		24,225		493		4.10	%		24,011		481		4.04	%
Commercial		96,954		2,175		4.52	%		98,399		2,508		5.14	%
Consumer		22,484		969		8.69	%		26,466		1,097		8.36	%
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		68,204		1,463		4.33	%		111,722		2,782		5.02	%
Direct Financing Leases		2,442		66		5.45	%		3,263		84		5.19	%
Other		286		20		14.10	%		10		-		-
Total Loans and Leases		821,420		21,408		5.26	%		816,273		22,275		5.50	%
Total Interest Earning Assets ⁽⁵⁾		1,306,503		26,634		4.23	%		1,248,183		25,806		4.28	%
Other Earning Assets		6,003							6,271
Non-Earning Assets		131,183							141,312
Total Assets	$	1,443,689						$	1,395,766
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest Bearing Deposits:
Demand Deposits	$	101,765	$	133		0.26	%	$	85,470	$	151		0.36	%
NOW		233,408		167		0.14	%		195,089		193		0.20	%
Savings Accounts		150,188		151		0.20	%		130,257		136		0.21	%
Money Market		72,536		41		0.11	%		73,138		54		0.15	%
CDAR's		13,092		16		0.25	%		13,994		20		0.29	%
Certificates of Deposit<$100,000		78,856		177		0.45	%		95,897		224		0.47	%
Certificates of Deposit>$100,000		202,729		377		0.38	%		213,754		429		0.40	%
Brokered Deposits		6,216		49		1.59	%		11,575		81		1.41	%
Total Interest Bearing Deposits		858,790		1,111		0.26	%		819,174		1,288		0.32	%
Borrowed Funds:
Federal Funds Purchased		22		-		-			1		-		-
Repurchase Agreements		5,989		9		0.30	%		1,836		6		0.66	%
Short Term Borrowings		372		-		-			7,051		6		0.17	%
Long Term Borrowings		-		-		-			2,099		33		3.17	%
TRUPS		30,928		349		2.28	%		30,928		356		2.32	%
Total Borrowed Funds		37,311		358		1.93	%		41,915		401		1.93	%
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities		896,101		1,469		0.33	%		861,089		1,689		0.40	%
Demand deposits- non interest bearing		343,849							340,020
Other liabilities		18,481							18,837
Shareholders' equity		185,258							175,820
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,443,689						$	1,395,766
Interest Income/Interest Earning Assets						4.23	%						4.28	%
Interest Expense/Interest Earning Assets						0.23	%						0.28	%
Net Interest Income and Margin⁽⁶⁾			$	25,165		4.00	%			$	24,117		4.00	%

⁽¹⁾

Average balances are obtained from the best available daily or monthly data and are net of deferred fees and related direct costs.

⁽²⁾

Yields and net interest margin have been computed on a tax equivalent basis utilizing a 34% effective tax rate.

⁽³⁾

Annualized

⁽⁴⁾

Loan costs have been included in the calculation of interest income. Loan costs were approximately $(349) thousand and $32 thousand for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Loans are gross of the allowance for possible loan losses.

⁽⁵⁾

Non-accrual loans have been included in total loans for purposes of total earning assets.

⁽⁶⁾

Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

The Volume and Rate Variances table below sets forth the dollar difference in interest earned or paid for each major category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the noted periods, and the amount of such change attributable to fluctuations in average balances (volume) or differences in average interest rates. Volume variances are equal to the increase or decrease in average balance multiplied by prior period rates, and rate variances are equal to the increase or decrease in rate times prior period average balances. Variances attributable to both rate and volume changes are calculated by multiplying the change in rate by the change in average balance, and have been allocated to the rate variance.

Volume & Rate Variances	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2014 over 2013									2014 over 2013
	Increase(decrease) due to									Increase(decrease) due to
Assets:		Volume			Rate			Net			Volume			Rate			Net
Investments:
Federal funds sold / Due from time	$	(3	)	$	3		$	-		$	5		$	2		$	7
Taxable		139			703			842			234			1,288			1,522
Non-taxable⁽¹⁾		82			(21	)		61			242			(59	)		183
Equity		-			-			-			4			(21	)		(17	)
Total Investments		218			685			903			485			1,210			1,695
Loans and Leases:
Real Estate		986			(494	)		492			1,510			(611	)		899
Agricultural		(6	)		(14	)		(20	)		4			8			12
Commercial		-			(147	)		(147	)		(37	)		(296	)		(333	)
Consumer		(86	)		23			(63	)		(165	)		37			(128	)
Mortgage Warehouse		(382	)		(190	)		(572	)		(1,084	)		(235	)		(1,319	)
Direct Financing Leases		(10	)		(2	)		(12	)		(21	)		3			(18	)
Other		-			11			11			-			20			20
Total Loans and Leases		502			(813	)		(311	)		207			(1,074	)		(867	)
Total Interest Earning Assets	$	720		$	(128	)	$	592		$	692		$	136		$	828
Liabilities
Interest Bearing Deposits:
Demand Deposits	$	22		$	(27	)	$	(5	)	$	29		$	(47	)	$	(18	)
NOW		26			(35	)		(9	)		38			(64	)		(26	)
Savings Accounts		11			(7	)		4			21			(6	)		15
Money Market		1			(4	)		(3	)		-			(13	)		(13	)
CDAR's		-			-			-			(1	)		(3	)		(4	)
Certificates of Deposit < $100,000		(15	)		(5	)		(20	)		(40	)		(7	)		(47	)
Certificates of Deposit > $100,000		(12	)		(15	)		(27	)		(22	)		(30	)		(52	)
Brokered Deposits		(16	)		1			(15	)		(38	)		6			(32	)
Total Interest Bearing Deposits		17			(92	)		(75	)		(13	)		(164	)		(177	)
Borrowed Funds:
Federal Funds Purchased		-			-			-			-			-			-
Repurchase Agreements		5			(4	)		1			14			(11	)		3
Short Term Borrowings		(5	)		-			(5	)		(6	)		-			(6	)
Long Term Borrowings		-			-			-			(33	)		-			(33	)
TRUPS		-			(4	)		(4	)		-			(7	)		(7	)
Total Borrowed Funds		-			(8	)		(8	)		(25	)		(18	)		(43	)
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities		17			(100	)		(83	)		(38	)		(182	)		(220	)
Net Interest Margin/Income	$	703		$	(28	)	$	675		$	730		$	318		$	1,048

(1) Yields on tax exempt income have not been computed on a tax equivalent basis.

The volume variance calculated for the second quarter of 2014 relative to the second quarter of 2013 was a favorable $703,000, due primarily to an $82 million increase in average interest-earning assets. The volume variance for the comparative quarters was enhanced by migration from time deposits and non-deposit borrowings into lower-cost non-maturity deposits, and a shift within loans to higher-yielding categories. The volume variance was negatively impacted by a relatively large increase in the average balance of lower yielding investments. Average loans and leases increased by $35 million, or 4%, while average investment balances increased $48 million, or 11%.

The impact of interest rate changes resulted in an unfavorable rate variance of $28,000 in net interest income for the comparative quarters. Our weighted average yield on interest-earning assets fell 8 basis points due to lower loan rates stemming from continued competition for quality loans, partially offset by a higher yield on our investment portfolio. By comparison, our weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 6 basis points lower due primarily to a slight drop in deposit rates. The negative rate variance is exacerbated by our sizeable net interest position, which is the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Our average net interest position for the second quarter of 2013, the base period for the rate variance calculation, was $397 million, thus the yield decrease for interest-earning assets was applied to a much higher balance than the rate decrease for interest-bearing liabilities and had a greater impact on net interest income. Partially alleviating the negative pressures on our rate variance was non-recurring interest income such as net interest recovered on non-accrual loans and prepayment penalties, which totaled $280,000 in the second quarter of 2014 relative to $132,000 in the second quarter of 2013.

The Company’s net interest margin, which is tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets, is affected by the same factors discussed above relative to rate and volume variances. Our net interest margin was 4.00% in the second quarter of 2014, a drop of four basis points relative to the second quarter of 2013. The principal factors favorably impacting our net interest margin in the second quarter of 2014 include the drop in deposit rates, the shift from higher-cost time deposits into lower-cost non-maturity deposits, and the shift into higher-yielding loan categories. Offsetting the favorable factors were competitive pressures on loan yields and disproportionate growth in lower-yielding investments.

For the first half of 2014 relative to the first half of 2013, the favorable variance in net interest income attributable to volume changes was $730,000, and there was also a favorable rate variance of $318,000. The volume variance for the half was due primarily to a $58 million increase in average interest-earning assets, which was enhanced by relatively strong growth in the average balances of low-cost customer deposits and equity and a shift in average loan balances into higher-yielding categories. The favorable rate variance for the half is the result of a five basis point drop in the yield on average interest-earning assets, relative to a seven basis point decline in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. As with the quarter, non-recurring interest income favorably impacted the rate variance for the half. Interest recoveries and prepayment penalties totaled $288,000 for the first half of 2014, relative to only $121,000 in the first half of 2013. The Company’s net interest margin for the first half of 2014 was 4.00%, the same as our net interest margin for the first half of 2013.

Provision for loan and LEASE losses

Credit risk is inherent in the business of making loans. The Company sets aside an allowance for loan and lease losses, a contra-asset account, through periodic charges to earnings which are reflected in the income statement as the provision for loan and lease losses. The Company’s loan loss provision totaled $200,000 for the second quarter of 2014 and $350,000 for the first six months of 2014, representing reductions of $250,000, or 56%, in the second quarter and $1.700 million, or 83% in the first half relative to the same periods in 2013. Our loan loss provision in 2014 has been utilized primarily to provide specific reserves for loans migrating from non-impaired to impaired status during the period.

The Company’s loan loss provision has been sufficient to maintain our allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb probable loan losses related to specifically-identified impaired loans as well as probable incurred losses in the remaining loan portfolio. Specifically identifiable and quantifiable loan losses are immediately charged off against the allowance. We had only $57,000 in net loans charged off in the second quarter of 2014 relative to $1.469 million in the second quarter of 2013, for a reduction of $1.412 million, or 96%. There were $393,000 in net loan charge-offs in the first half of 2014 relative to $3.743 million in the first half of 2013, for a reduction of $3.351 million, or 90%. Gross charge-offs declined, and a significant level of principal recoveries on non-accrual loans that were sold or otherwise resolved during 2014 also contributed to the relatively low level of net charge-offs. Additional factors which helped minimize our need for reserve replenishment via the loan loss provision in 2014 include the fact that the majority of our loan charge-offs have been recorded against reserves established in previous periods, and the fact that the credit quality of our performing loan portfolio continues to improve as newer loans have been underwritten utilizing more stringent criteria than older vintage loans.

The Company’s policies for monitoring the adequacy of the allowance and determining loan amounts that should be charged off, and other detailed information with regard to changes in the allowance, are discussed in note 12 to the consolidated financial statements and below under “Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses.” The process utilized to establish an appropriate allowance for loan and lease losses can result in a high degree of variability in the Company’s loan loss provision, and consequently in our net earnings.

NON-INTEREST INCOME and NON-INTEREST expense

The following table provides details on the Company’s non-interest income and non-interest expense for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
NON-INTEREST INCOME:		2014		% of Total			2013	% of Total			2014		% of Total			2013	% of Total
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	2,039		50.76	%	$	2,215	55.07	%	$	3,925		50.81	%	$	4,288	52.69	%
Other service charges, commissions & fees		1,439		35.81	%		1,411	35.08	%		2,785		36.05	%		2,862	35.17	%
Gains on sales of loans		-		-			32	0.80	%		3		0.04	%		68	0.84	%
Gains on securities		183		4.55	%		-	-			287		3.72	%		6	0.07	%
Loan servicing income		1		0.02	%		-	-			2		0.03	%		3	0.04	%
Bank owned life insurance		403		10.03	%		317	7.88	%		688		8.91	%		824	10.13	%
Other		(47	)	-1.17	%		47	1.17	%		35		0.44	%		87	1.06	%
Total non-interest income	$	4,018		100.00	%	$	4,022	100.00	%	$	7,725		100.00	%	$	8,138	100.00	%
As a % of average interest-earning assets⁽¹⁾				1.21	%			1.29	%				1.19	%			1.31	%

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits	$	5,328		48.40	%	$	5,403	50.42	%	$	11,313		52.05	%	$	11,323	50.24	%
Occupancy costs
Furniture & equipment		466		4.23	%		531	4.95	%		919		4.23	%		1,034	4.59	%
Premises		1,066		9.67	%		1,065	9.94	%		2,118		9.74	%		2,113	9.38	%
Advertising and marketing costs		582		5.29	%		421	3.93	%		1,211		5.57	%		843	3.74	%
Data processing costs		766		6.96	%		377	3.52	%		1,264		5.82	%		763	3.39	%
Deposit services costs		662		6.01	%		611	5.70	%		1,278		5.88	%		1,212	5.38	%
Loan services costs
Loan processing		188		1.71	%		218	2.03	%		460		2.12	%		372	1.65	%
Foreclosed assets		112		1.02	%		18	0.17	%		(386	)	-1.78	%		792	3.51	%
Other operating costs
Telephone & data communications		210		1.91	%		448	4.18	%		476		2.19	%		873	3.87	%
Postage & mail		162		1.47	%		163	1.52	%		350		1.61	%		342	1.52	%
Other		218		1.98	%		160	1.49	%		352		1.62	%		288	1.28	%
Professional services costs
Legal & accounting		256		2.33	%		521	4.86	%		641		2.95	%		953	4.23	%
Other professional service		551		5.01	%		552	5.15	%		1,048		4.82	%		1,160	5.15	%
Stationery & supply costs		350		3.18	%		144	1.35	%		528		2.43	%		313	1.39	%
Sundry & tellers		91		0.83	%		85	0.79	%		164		0.75	%		157	0.69	%
Total non-interest expense	$	11,008		100.00	%	$	10,717	100.00	%	$	21,736		100.00	%	$	22,538	100.00	%
As a % of average interest-earning assets⁽¹⁾				3.31	%			3.43	%				3.35	%			3.64	%
Efficiency Ratio ⁽²⁾				64.06	%			64.90	%				66.96	%			66.75	%

(1)) Annualized

(2)) Tax Equivalent

Despite a higher level of non-recurring gains on the sale of investments, total non-interest income was about the same for the comparative quarters and fell by $413,000, or 5%, for the comparative year-to-date periods. Both the quarter and the first half were negatively impacted by lower service charges on deposits, and the first half was also affected by a drop in income on bank-owned life insurance. Total non-interest income was an annualized 1.21% of average interest-earning assets in the second quarter of 2014 relative to 1.29% in the second quarter of 2013, and was 1.19% for the first six months of 2014 relative to 1.31% for the first six months of 2013. The lower ratio is due in part to an increase in average interest-earning assets.

Service charge income on deposits fell by $176,000, or 8%, for the quarterly comparison and by $363,000, or 8%, for the comparative six-month periods due in large part to lower returned item and overdraft charges. The year-to-date comparison was also negatively impacted by certain non-recurring fee waivers made in the course of our core software conversion. Other service charges, commissions, and fees increased by $28,000, or 2%, for the quarter, but were down $77,000 for the year-to-date comparison due to the impact of a $100,000 non-recurring incentive received in conjunction with our conversion to a new merchant processing vendor in the first quarter of 2013. While not material, gains on the sale of loans declined for both the quarter and the half since the Company has been retaining all of the loans it originates. Loan servicing income has also dropped to insignificant levels in recent periods. We realized $183,000 in gains on the sale of investments in the second quarter of 2014 and $287,000 in gains during the first half of 2014, relative to no investment gains in the second quarter of 2013 and only $6,000 in gains for the first half of 2013.

Bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) income increased by $86,000, or 27%, in the second quarter of 2014 relative to the second quarter of 2013 but dropped by $136,000, or 17%, for the comparative first half results, mainly due to fluctuations in income on BOLI associated with deferred compensation plans. The Company owns and derives income from two basic types of BOLI: “general account” and “separate account.” At June 30, 2014 the Company had $35.7 million invested in single-premium general account BOLI, which generates income that is used to fund expenses associated with executive salary continuation plans, director retirement plans and other employee benefits. Interest credit rates on general account BOLI do not change frequently and its income is typically fairly consistent from year to year, but rate reductions have led to slightly reduced income levels in recent periods. In addition to general account BOLI the Company had $4.5 million invested in separate account BOLI at June 30, 2014, the earnings on which help offset deferred compensation accruals for certain directors and senior officers. These deferred compensation BOLI accounts have returns pegged to participant-directed investment allocations that can include equity, bond, or real estate indices, and are thus subject to gains or losses which often contribute to significant fluctuations in income (and associated expense accruals). There was a gain on separate account BOLI totaling $152,000 in the second quarter of 2014 relative to a gain of $64,000 in the second quarter of 2013, for a quarter over quarter increase of $88,000 in deferred compensation BOLI income. For the first six months gains totaled $197,000 in 2014 relative to $314,000 in 2013, representing a reduction of $117,000. As noted, gains and losses on separate account BOLI are related to expense accruals or reversals associated with participant gains and losses on deferred compensation balances, thus their impact on taxable income tends to be neutral.

The “Other” category under non-interest income includes gains and losses on the disposition of assets other than OREO, loan sale and servicing income, and dividends on restricted stock. Pass-through expenses associated with our investments in low-income housing tax credit funds are netted out of this income category. Other non-interest income was down $93,000 for the quarter and reflects a drop of $52,000 for the first half, due in large part to adjustments made to expenses associated with our low-income housing tax credit fund investments in the second quarter of 2014. Income generated in conjunction with the Company’s alliance with Investment Centers of America (ICA) has also been included in Other Non-Interest Income, but the Company terminated its affiliation with ICA effective July 31, 2014. While non-interest income will thus decline in future periods, certain expenses associated with our ICA relationship will also be eliminated and the net financial impact on the Company is not expected to be material.

Total non-interest expense increased by $291,000, or 3%, in the second quarter of 2014 relative to the second quarter of 2013, but was down $802,000, or 4%, for the comparative six-month periods. As detailed below, the increase for the quarter is primarily due to an increase in ongoing costs resulting from our core banking software conversion in February 2014, while the reduction for the year-to-date comparison is largely the result of gains on the sale of foreclosed assets in the first quarter of 2014. Non-interest expense was an annualized 3.31% of average interest-earning assets in the second quarter of 2014 relative to 3.43% in the second quarter of 2013, and improved to an annualized 3.35% of average interest-earning assets for the first six months of 2014 relative to 3.64% for the first six months of 2013.

The largest component of non-interest expense, salaries and employee benefits, reflect a quarter over quarter decrease of $75,000, or 1%, but were about the same for the comparative six-month periods. The greatest favorable impact on compensation expense came from the deferral of salaries directly related to successful loan originations, which increased by $125,000 for the second quarter and $213,000 for the first half. Stock option expense was reduced by $36,000 in the second quarter and $113,000 in the first half of 2014, and the first-half comparison was also favorably impacted by a reduction in deferred compensation plan expense accruals related to the aforementioned first-half decrease in BOLI income. Deferred compensation accruals were higher for the quarter, however, partially offsetting some the favorable quarterly variances. Deferred compensation plan expense accruals for employee participants totaled $95,000 in the second quarter of 2014 relative to $33,000 in the second quarter of 2013, and were $149,000 for the first six months of 2014 relative to $202,000 for the first six months of 2013. The year-to-date results in 2014 were negatively impacted by a non-recurring increase of about $164,000 in overtime costs related to our core conversion. Salaries and benefits fell to 48.40% of total non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2014 from 50.42% in the second quarter of 2013, but increased to 52.05% for the first six months of 2014 relative to 50.24% in the first six months of 2013.

Total occupancy expense fell by $63,000, or 4%, for quarterly comparison and dropped by $110,000, or 3%, for the comparative six-month periods. Occupancy expense was lower in 2014 due to lower depreciation expense on furniture and equipment, despite additional expenses resulting from our rebranding project and our information technology network upgrade. Marketing costs rose by $161,000, or 38%, for the quarter and by $368,000, or 44%, for the first half due in part to the timing of payments for deposit-gathering initiatives, but much of the increase is attributable to expenses associated with our recent rebranding project. Data processing costs were up $389,000, or 103%, for the quarter and increased by $501,000, or 66% for the first half due to an increase in costs subsequent to our core conversion in the first quarter of 2014. Total deposit services costs increased by $51,000, or 8%, for the quarterly comparison and by $66,000, or 5% for the first six months, due primarily to higher electronic check exchange costs.

Total loan services costs reflect an increase of $64,000, or 27%, for the quarter, but were reduced by $1.090 million, or 94%, for the first six months due to fluctuations in gains and losses on the sale of foreclosed assets. Net gains, which are reflected as an offset to operating expense, totaled $119,000 in the second quarter of 2014 relative to $180,000 in the second quarter of 2013. For the first half, the Company realized a net gain on the sale of foreclosed assets totaling $842,000 in 2014 relative to a net loss on the sale of foreclosed assets totaling $307,000 in 2013, for an absolute difference of $1.149 million.

Telecommunications costs were down $238,000, or 53%, for the quarter and $397,000, or 45%, for the first six months, due in part to credits received in 2014 for prior-period overpayments. Those credits totaled $51,000 in the second quarter and $155,000 for the first six months, with the remainder of the reduction in telecommunications costs resulting primarily from renegotiated billing rates. Postage costs were roughly the same in 2014 as in 2013, while the “other” category under other operating costs increased by $57,000, or 36%, for the quarter and $64,000, or 22%, for the first half due in large part to hiring and recruiting costs incurred in 2014.

Under professional services costs, legal and accounting costs declined by $265,000, or 51%, in the second quarter and by $312,000, or 33%, in the first half of 2014 due to lower legal costs for loan collections in 2014 and elevated loan review costs in the prior year. The cost of other professional services was about the same for the comparative second quarters, but dropped by $112,000, or 10%, for the first half of 2014 due to in large part to lower accruals for directors deferred compensation plans (related to the drop in BOLI income discussed above). Stationery and supply costs increased by $206,000, or 143%, for the second quarter, and by $215,000, or 69%, for the first half of 2014, due to increased costs resulting from our core conversion and non-recurring costs associated with our rebranding effort. Sundry and teller losses were about the same in 2014 as in 2013.

The Company’s tax-equivalent overhead efficiency ratio was 64.06% in the second quarter of 2014 relative to 64.90% in the second quarter of 2013, and was 66.96% for the first six months of 2014 as compared to 66.75% for the first six months of 2013. The overhead efficiency ratio represents total non-interest expense divided by the sum of fully tax-equivalent net interest and non-interest income, with the provision for loan losses, investment gains/losses, OREO gains/losses, and certain other extraordinary items excluded from the equation.

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

The Company sets aside a provision for income taxes on a monthly basis. The amount of that provision is determined by first applying the Company’s statutory income tax rates to estimated taxable income, which is pre-tax book income adjusted for permanent differences, and then subtracting available tax credits. Permanent differences include but are not limited to tax-exempt interest income, BOLI income, California Enterprise Zone deductions, and certain book expenses that are not allowed as tax deductions. BOLI income was higher in the second quarter but lower for the first half in 2014, as discussed above, while interest income on municipal securities increased by 9% for the quarterly comparison and 14% for the comparative year-to-date periods. Our tax credits consist primarily of those generated by investments in low-income housing tax credit funds, and California state employment tax credits. Effective January 1, 2014, changes in California tax law eliminated certain state income tax credits and deductions, which had a negative impact on our tax accrual rate.

Because of the relatively high portion of the Company’s pretax income that consists of tax-exempt interest income and BOLI income, and the level of tax credits available in relation to our pre-credit tax liability as calculated for book purposes, our tax accrual rate is currently very sensitive to changes in pretax income. The referenced factors resulted in an income tax provision of $1.523 million, or 26% of pre-tax income in the second quarter of 2014, relative to a provision of $1.331 million, or 26% of pre-tax income in the second quarter of 2013. For the first six months, our tax provision was $2.768 million, or 26% of pre-tax income in 2014, relative to $1.535 million, or 20% of pre-tax income in 2013.

balance sheet analysis

EARNING ASSETS

The Company’s interest-earning assets are comprised of investments and loans, and the composition, growth characteristics, and credit quality of both are significant determinants of the Company’s financial condition. Investments are analyzed in the section immediately below, while the loan and lease portfolio and other factors affecting earning assets are discussed in the sections following investments.

INVESTMENTS

The Company’s investments consist of debt securities and marketable equity securities (together, the “investment portfolio”), investments in the time deposits of other banks, surplus interest-earning balances in our Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) account, and overnight fed funds sold. Surplus FRB balances and fed funds sold to correspondent banks represent the temporary investment of excess liquidity. The Company’s investments serve several purposes: 1) they provide liquidity to even out cash flows from the loan and deposit activities of customers; 2) they provide a source of pledged assets for securing public deposits, bankruptcy deposits and certain borrowed funds which require collateral; 3) they constitute a large base of assets with maturity and interest rate characteristics that can be changed more readily than the loan portfolio, to better match changes in the deposit base and other funding sources of the Company; 4) they are an alternative interest-earning use of funds when loan demand is light; and 5) they can provide partially tax exempt income. Aggregate investments totaled $464 million, or 31% of total assets at June 30, 2014, compared to $452 million, or 32% of total assets at December 31, 2013.

We had no fed funds sold at June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013, while interest-bearing balances at other banks dropped to $4 million at June 30, 2014 from $27 million at December 31, 2013 as excess liquidity was invested in higher-yielding longer-term bonds. The Company’s investment portfolio reflects an increase of $35 million, or 8%, for the first six months of 2014, ending the period with a book balance of $460 million. The Company carries investments at their fair market values. Although we currently have the intent and ability to hold our investment securities to maturity, the securities are all marketable and are classified as “available for sale” to allow maximum flexibility with regard to interest rate risk and liquidity management.

The following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair market value of Company’s investment portfolio by investment type as of the dates noted:


Investment Portfolio
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)	June 30, 2014				December 31, 2013

	Amortized		Fair Market		Amortized		Fair Market
	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Available for Sale
US Government agencies & corporations	$	4,743	$	4,672	$	5,395	$	5,304
Mortgage-backed securities		351,139		354,186		320,223		320,721
State & political subdivisions		96,592		98,399		97,361		96,563
Equity securities		1,336		2,487		1,336		2,456
Total investment securities	$	453,810	$	459,744	$	424,315	$	425,044

The net unrealized gain on our investment portfolio, or the difference between the fair market value and amortized cost, was $5.9 million at June 30, 2014, up from $729,000 at December 31, 2013 due to higher market values resulting from lower long-term interest rates. The balance of mortgage-backed securities increased by $33 million, or 10%, during the first six months of 2014 due to bond purchases and higher market values, net of prepayments. Municipal bonds increased by about $2 million, or 2%, due to bond purchases and higher market values.

Investment portfolio securities that were pledged as collateral for FHLB borrowings, repurchase agreements, public deposits and other purposes as required or permitted by law totaled $145 million at June 30, 2014 and $164 million at December 31, 2013, leaving $312 million in unpledged debt securities at June 30, 2014 and $258 million at December 31, 2013. Securities which were pledged in excess of actual pledging needs and were thus available for liquidity purposes, if needed, totaled $41 million at June 30, 2014 and $67 million at December 31, 2013.

Loan AND LEASE Portfolio

The Company’s loans and leases, gross of the associated allowance for losses and deferred fees and origination costs but not including loans held for sale, totaled $893 million at June 30, 2014, an increase of $90 million, or 11%, since December 31, 2013. The increase is due to organic growth in mortgage warehouse loans, commercial real estate loans and loans secured by farmland, as well as the purchase of $33 million in residential mortgage loans in the first quarter of 2014.

A distribution of the Company’s loans showing the balance and percentage of total loans by type is presented for the noted periods in the following table. The balances shown are before deferred or unamortized loan origination, extension, or commitment fees, and deferred origination costs.

Loan and Lease Distribution
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013

Real Estate:
1-4 family residential construction	$	4,120		$	1,720
Other construction/land		23,154			25,531
1-4 family - closed-end		113,860			87,024
Equity lines		51,322			53,723
Multi-family residential		6,988			8,485
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		207,656			186,012
Commercial real estate- non-owner occupied		106,003			106,840
Farmland		125,693			108,504
Total real estate		638,796			577,839
Agricultural		26,142			25,180
Commercial and industrial		101,348			103,262
Mortgage warehouse lines		106,157			73,425
Consumer loans		20,598			23,536
Total loans and leases	$	893,041		$	803,242
Percentage of Total Loans and Leases
Real Estate:
1-4 family residential construction		0.46	%		0.21	%
Other construction/land		2.59	%		3.18	%
1-4 family - closed-end		12.75	%		10.83	%
Equity lines		5.75	%		6.69	%
Multi-family residential		0.78	%		1.06	%
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		23.25	%		23.16	%
Commercial real estate- non-owner occupied		11.87	%		13.30	%
Farmland		14.07	%		13.51	%
Total real estate		71.52	%		71.94	%
Agricultural		2.93	%		3.13	%
Commercial and industrial		11.35	%		12.86	%
Mortgage warehouse lines		11.89	%		9.14	%
Consumer loans		2.31	%		2.93	%
Total loans and leases		100.00	%		100.00	%

Real estate loans classified as 1-4 family closed-end loans increased $27 million, or 31%, due to the aforementioned purchase of well-underwritten, newer vintage residential mortgage loans which have an expected average life of about eight years. Management views the loan purchase primarily as a liquidity deployment strategy rather than a loan growth strategy. With the exception of residential construction loans, which were up about $2 million, other residential real estate loan categories declined slightly. However, owner-occupied commercial real estate loans increased $22 million, or 12%, due to escalating activity in certain markets in our footprint in addition to approximately $11 million in loans reclassified as “real estate” from “commercial and industrial” in the course of our core conversion. Commercial loans reflect a decline of $2 million, or 2%, but would have increased if not for the aforementioned conversion-related reclassifications. Outstanding balances on mortgage warehouse lines were up $33 million, or 45%, since utilization on lines increased to 39% at June 30, 2014 from 26% at December 31, 2013. Mortgage lending activity is strongly correlated to interest rates and refinancing activity and has historically been subject to significant fluctuations, so no assurance can be provided with regard to our ability to maintain or grow mortgage warehouse balances. While not reflected in the loan totals above and not currently comprising a material segment of our lending activities, the Company occasionally originates and sells, or participates out portions of, loans to non-affiliated investors.

NONPERFORMING ASSETS

Nonperforming assets are comprised of loans for which the Company is no longer accruing interest, and foreclosed assets including mobile homes and other real estate owned (OREO). If the Company grants a concession to a borrower in financial difficulty, the loan falls into the category of a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). TDRs may be classified as either nonperforming or performing loans depending on their accrual status. The following table presents comparative data for the Company’s nonperforming assets and performing TDRs, as of the dates noted:

Nonperforming Assets and Performing Troubled Debt Restructurings
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013			June 30, 2013
NON-ACCRUAL LOANS:
Real Estate:
1-4 family residential construction	$	-		$	-		$	-
Other construction/land		3,682			5,528			6,160
1-4 family - closed-end		10,071			13,168			15,162
Equity lines		1,997			778			887
Multi-family residential		-			-			-
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		3,485			5,516			6,844
Commercial real estate- non-owner occupied		7,671			8,058			7,713
Farmland		173			282			455
TOTAL REAL ESTATE		27,079			33,330			37,221
Agriculture		327			470			21
Commercial and industrial		992			2,622			3,892
Mortgage warehouse lines		-			-			-
Consumer loans		838			992			1,175
TOTAL NONPERFORMING LOANS		29,236			37,414			42,309

Foreclosed assets		4,498			8,185			10,834
Total nonperforming assets	$	33,734		$	45,599		$	53,143
Performing TDR's⁽¹⁾	$	13,203		$	15,239		$	17,657
Nonperforming loans as a % of total gross loans and leases		3.27	%		4.66	%		5.22	%
Nonperforming assets as a % of total gross loans
and leases and foreclosed assets		3.76	%		5.62	%		6.47	%

(1) Performing TDRs are not included in nonperforming loans above, nor are they included in the numerators used to calculate the ratios disclosed in this table.

Total nonperforming assets were reduced by $11.9 million, or 26%, during the first six months of 2014. Nonperforming loans were decreased by $8.2 million, or 22%, while foreclosed assets were down $3.7 million, or 45%. The balance of nonperforming loans at June 30, 2014 includes $11.7 million in TDRs and other loans that were paying as agreed under modified terms or forbearance agreements but were still classified as nonperforming. As shown in the table, we also had $13.2 million in loans classified as performing TDRs for which we were still accruing interest as of June 30, 2014, a reduction of $2.0 million, or 13%, relative to the balance of performing TDRs at December 31, 2013.

Non-accruing loan balances secured by real estate comprised $27.1 million of total nonperforming loans at June 30, 2014, down $6.3 million, or 19%, since December 31, 2013. While there were total pay-downs of $10.5 million on nonperforming real estate loans in the first six months of 2014, they were partially offset by additions. Nonperforming commercial loans were reduced by $1.6 million, or 62%, during the first six months of 2014.

As noted above, foreclosed assets were reduced by $3.7 million, or 45%, during the first six months of 2014 due primarily to OREO sold, but write-downs on OREO totaling $223,000 also contributed to the reduction. The balance of foreclosed assets had an aggregate carrying value of $4.5 million at June 30, 2014, and was comprised of 28 properties classified as OREO and eight mobile homes. Much of our OREO at June 30, 2014 consisted of vacant lots or land, but there were also 10 commercial properties with a combined book balance of $1.6 million. At the end of 2013 foreclosed assets totaled $8.2 million, comprised of 33 properties in OREO and five mobile homes. All foreclosed assets are periodically evaluated and written down to their fair value less expected disposition costs, if lower than the then-current carrying value.

Total nonperforming assets were 3.76% of gross loans and leases plus foreclosed assets at June 30, 2014, down from 5.62% at December 31, 2013. An action plan is in place for each of our non-accruing loans and foreclosed assets and they are all being actively managed. Collection efforts are continuously pursued for all nonperforming loans, but we cannot provide assurance that all will be resolved in a timely manner or that nonperforming balances will not increase further.

Allowance for loan and lease Losses

The allowance for loan and lease losses, a contra-asset, is established through a provision for loan and lease losses. It is maintained at a level that is considered adequate to absorb probable losses on certain specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred losses inherent in the remaining loan portfolio. Specifically identifiable and quantifiable losses are immediately charged off against the allowance; recoveries are generally recorded only when cash payments are received subsequent to the charge off. An allowance for potential losses inherent in unused commitments totaling $269,000 at June 30, 2014 is included in other liabilities.

The Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses was $11.6 million, or 1.30% of gross loans at June 30, 2014, relative to $11.7 million, or 1.45% of gross loans at December 31, 2013. The decline in the allowance in the first six months of 2014 was due to the fact that loan charge-offs during the period were, for the most part, charged against loss reserves established in previous periods and did not necessarily lead to the need for reserve replenishment. The ratio of the allowance to nonperforming loans was 39.79% at June 30, 2014, relative to 31.21% at December 31, 2013 and 28.79% at June 30, 2013.

The table that follows summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the noted periods:

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)	For the Three Months			For the Three Months			For the Six Months			For the Six Months			For the Year
	Ended June 30,			Ended June 30,			Ended June 30,			Ended June 30,			Ended December 31,
Balances:	2014			2013			2014			2013			2013
Average gross loans and leases outstanding during period ⁽¹⁾	$	858,572		$	823,831		$	821,420		$	816,273		$	804,533
Gross loans and leases outstanding at end of period	$	893,041		$	810,194		$	893,041		$	810,194		$	803,242

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:
Balance at beginning of period	$	11,491		$	13,199		$	11,677		$	13,873		$	13,873
Provision charged to expense		200			450			350			2,050			4,350
Charge-offs
Real Estate
1-4 family residential construction		-			-			-			-			-
Other Construction/Land		58			27			58			291			625
1-4 family - closed-end		10			211			10			368			454
Equity Lines		208			19			290			515			1,131
Multi-family residential		-			-			-			-			-
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		31			342			31			442			933
Commercial real estate- non-owner occupied		-			-			45			405			523
Farmland		-			539			-			539			539
TOTAL REAL ESTATE	$	307		$	1,138		$	434		$	2,560		$	4,205
Agricultural		-			-			124			28			473
Commercial & industrial loans		226			517			412			1,465			1,668
Consumer Loans		564			298			985			605			1,917
Total	$	1,097		$	1,953		$	1,955		$	4,658		$	8,263
Recoveries
Real Estate
1-4 family residential construction		22			-			25			-			-
Other Construction/Land		380			1			540			111			174
1-4 family - closed-end		95			2			153			4			58
Equity Lines		24			3			49			4			118
Multi-family residential		-			-			-			-			36
Commercial real estate- owner occupied		319			4			380			13			60
Commercial real estate- non-owner occupied		52			129			52			172			172
Farmland		-			-			-			-			-
TOTAL REAL ESTATE	$	892		$	139		$	1,199		$	304		$	618
Agricultural		1			-			2			-			-
Commercial and Industrial		54			296			98			535			802
Consumer Loans		93			49			263			76			297
Total	$	1,040		$	484		$	1,562		$	915		$	1,717
Net loan charge offs (recoveries)	$	57		$	1,469		$	393		$	3,743		$	6,546
Balance at end of period	$	11,634		$	12,180		$	11,634		$	12,180		$	11,677

RATIOS
Net Charge-offs to Average Loans and Leases (annualized)		0.03	%		0.72	%		0.10	%		0.92	%		0.81	%
Allowance for Loan Losses to
Gross Loans and Leases at End of Period		1.30	%		1.50	%		1.30	%		1.50	%		1.45	%
Allowance for Loan Losses to
NonPerforming Loans		39.79	%		28.79	%		39.79	%		28.79	%		31.21	%
Net Loan Charge-offs to Allowance
for Loan Losses at End of Period		0.49	%		12.06	%		3.38	%		30.73	%		56.06	%
Net Loan Charge-offs to
Provision for Loan Losses		28.50	%		326.44	%		112.29	%		182.59	%		150.48	%

⁽¹⁾ Average balances are obtained from the best available daily or monthly data and are net of deferred fees and related direct costs.

As shown in the table immediately above, the Company’s provision for loan and lease losses was decreased by $250,000, or 56%, for the second quarter of 2014 relative to the second quarter of 2013, and by $1.700 million, or 83%, for the first six months of 2014 relative to the first six months of 2013. Net loans charged off were down by $1.412 million, or 96%, for the comparative quarters, and by $3.350 million, or 90%, for the comparative year-to-date periods. Our allowance for loan and lease losses is maintained at a level to cover probable losses on specifically identified loans as well as probable incurred losses in the remaining loan portfolio, and any shortfall in the allowance identified pursuant to our analysis of probable losses is covered by quarter-end. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, our allowance for probable losses on specifically identified impaired loans increased by $230,000 to provide for loans migrating from non-impaired to impaired status during that period, while our allowance for probable losses inherent in non-impaired loans declined by $272,000 as a reflection of continued improvement in the credit quality of those loans. The “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” section above includes additional details on our provision and its relationship to actual charge-offs.

The Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses at June 30, 2014 represents management’s best estimate of probable losses in the loan portfolio as of that date, but no assurance can be given that the Company will not experience substantial losses relative to the size of the allowance. Furthermore, fluctuations in credit quality, changes in economic conditions, updated accounting or regulatory requirements, and/or other factors could induce us to augment or reduce the allowance.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

In the normal course of business, the Company maintains commitments to extend credit as long as there are no violations of any conditions established in the outstanding contractual arrangements. Unused commitments to extend credit totaled $386 million at June 30, 2014 and $421 million at December 31, 2013, although it is not likely that all of those commitments will ultimately be drawn down. Unused commitments represented approximately 43% of gross loans outstanding at June 30, 2014 and 52% at December 31, 2013, with the drop due primarily to increased utilization on mortgage warehouse lines. The Company also had undrawn letters of credit issued to customers totaling $17 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The effect on the Company’s revenues, expenses, cash flows and liquidity from the unused portion of the commitments to provide credit cannot be reasonably predicted because there is no guarantee that the lines of credit will ever be used. However, the “Liquidity” section in this Form 10-Q outlines resources available to draw upon should we be required to fund a significant portion of unused commitments.

In addition to unused commitments to provide credit, the Company is utilizing an $88 million letter of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank on the Company’s behalf as security for certain deposits. That letter of credit is backed by loans which are pledged to the Federal Home Loan Bank by the Company. For more information regarding the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 8 to the financial statements located elsewhere herein.

OTHER ASSETS

The Company’s balance of non-interest earning cash and due from banks was $45 million at June 30, 2014 and $51 million at December 31, 2013. The balance of cash and due from banks depends on the timing of collection of outstanding cash items (checks) and our reserve requirement, among other things, and is subject to significant fluctuation in the normal course of business. While cash flows are normally predictable within limits, those limits are fairly broad and the Company manages its short-term cash position through the utilization of overnight loans to and borrowings from correspondent banks, including the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank. Should a large “short” overnight position persist for any length of time, the Company typically raises money through focused retail deposit gathering efforts or by adding brokered time deposits. If a “long” position is prevalent, the Company will let brokered deposits or other wholesale borrowings roll off as they mature, or might invest excess liquidity in higher-yielding, longer-term bonds.

Net premises and equipment increased by $401,000, or 2%, during the first six months of 2014, due mainly to equipment purchased in conjunction with our network upgrade net of the increase in accumulated depreciation during the period. Foreclosed assets are discussed above, in the section titled “Nonperforming Assets.” Goodwill did not change during the period, ending the first six months of 2014 with a balance of about $6 million. The Company’s goodwill is evaluated annually for potential impairment, and because the estimated fair value of the Company exceeded its book value (including goodwill) as of the measurement date and no impairment was indicated, no further testing was deemed necessary and it was determined that no goodwill impairment exists.

The aggregate balance of “other assets” fell by $4 million, or 5%, during the first six months of 2014, ending the period at $76 million. The largest contributor to the decline was a $2.7 million drop in current prepaid income taxes, which ended the first half of 2014 with a balance of only $54,000. At June 30, 2014 the balance of other assets included as its largest components $40.2 million in bank-owned life insurance (see discussion of BOLI in “Non-Interest Income and Non-Interest Expense” section above), a net deferred tax asset of $11.0 million, a $6.4 million investment in low-income housing tax credit funds, a $6.1 million investment in restricted stock, accrued interest receivable totaling $5.2 million, a $1.5 million investment in a small business investment corporation, and other prepaid assets totaling $2.7 million. Restricted stock is comprised primarily of Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”) stock held in conjunction with our FHLB borrowings, and is not deemed to be marketable or liquid. Our net deferred tax asset is evaluated as of every reporting date pursuant to FASB guidance, and we have determined that no impairment exists.

DEPOSITS AND INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES

DEPOSITS

Deposits are another key balance sheet component impacting the Company’s net interest margin and other profitability metrics. Deposits provide liquidity to fund growth in earning assets, and the Company’s net interest margin is improved to the extent that growth in deposits is concentrated in less volatile and typically less costly non-maturity deposits, which include demand deposit accounts, NOW accounts, savings accounts, and money market demand accounts. Information concerning average balances and rates paid by deposit type for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 is included in the Average Balances and Rates tables appearing above, in the section titled “Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin.” A distribution of the Company’s deposits showing the balance and percentage of total deposits by type is presented for the noted periods in the following table.

Deposit Distribution
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	$	351,757		$	365,997
Interest bearing demand deposits		118,984			82,408
NOW		247,940			200,313
Savings		154,415			144,162
Money market		72,541			73,132
CDAR's < $100,000		720			437
CDAR's ≥ $100,000		12,645			12,919
Customer time deposit < $100,000		76,739			79,261
Customer time deposits ≥ $100,000		202,386			205,550
Brokered deposits		8,000			10,000
Total deposits	$	1,246,127		$	1,174,179

Percentage of Total Deposits
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		28.23	%		31.17	%
Interest bearing demand deposits		9.55	%		7.02	%
NOW		19.90	%		17.05	%
Savings		12.39	%		12.28	%
Money market		5.82	%		6.23	%
CDAR's < $100,000		0.06	%		0.04	%
CDAR's ≥ $100,000		1.01	%		1.10	%
Customer time deposit < $100,000		6.16	%		6.75	%
Customer time deposits > $100,000		16.24	%		17.51	%
Brokered deposits		0.64	%		0.85	%
Total		100.00	%		100.00	%

Total deposit balances increased by $72 million, or 6%, during the first six months of 2014. Core non-maturity deposits increased by $80 million, or 9%, with about $70 million of that increase coming in transaction accounts (comprised of demand deposits and NOW accounts). Much of the growth in transaction account balances was centered in agricultural accounts and could be seasonal in nature. Also of note, about $40 million in non-interest bearing account balances were transitioned to interest-bearing transaction accounts in the course of our core conversion in February 2014, thus impacting the year-to-date variances within transaction accounts. Savings deposits also increased $10 million, or 7%, while money market balances reflect a slight decline for the first half of 2014. In contrast to the growth in non-maturity deposits, total time deposits fell by $8 million, or 2%, including a drop of $6 million in customer time deposits and a $2 million reduction in wholesale brokered deposits. Much of the reduction in time deposits, including the drop in brokered deposits, was due to the intentional non-renewal of deposits managed by our Treasury Department.

Management is of the opinion that a relatively high level of core customer deposits is one of the Company’s key strengths and we continue to strive for retention and growth, although no assurance can be provided with regard to core deposit growth or potential runoff.

OTHER INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES

The Company’s other interest-bearing liabilities may, at any given time, include a combination of fed funds purchased from correspondent banks, borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, advances from the Federal Reserve Bank, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, and/or junior subordinated debentures. The Company uses short-term FHLB advances and fed funds purchased on uncommitted lines from correspondent banks to support liquidity needs created by seasonal deposit flows, to temporarily satisfy funding needs from increased loan demand, and for other short-term purposes. The FHLB line is committed, but the amount of available credit depends on the level of pledged collateral.

Total non-deposit interest-bearing liabilities increased by $8 million, or 21%, in the first six months of 2014, due primarily to an increase in overnight borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank to support strong loan growth. Those borrowings totaled $8 million at June 30, 2014, up from zero at December 31, 2013. Repurchase agreements totaled $6 million at June 30, 2014, and did not change materially relative to December 31, 2013. Repurchase agreements represent “sweep accounts”, where commercial deposit balances above a specified threshold are transferred at the close of each business day into non-deposit accounts secured by investment securities. We had no fed funds purchased and no advances from the FRB on our books at June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013. The Company had junior subordinated debentures, in the form of long-term borrowings from trust subsidiaries formed specifically to issue trust preferred securities, totaling $31 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

OTHER NON-INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES

Other liabilities are principally comprised of accrued interest payable, other accrued but unpaid expenses, and certain clearing amounts. Other liabilities increased by $3 million, to $20 million at June 30, 2014 from $17 million at December 31, 2013.

liquidity and market RisK MANAGEMENT

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity refers to the Company’s ability to maintain cash flows that are adequate to fund operations and meet other obligations and commitments in a timely and cost-effective manner. Detailed cash flow projections are reviewed by management on a monthly basis, with various scenarios applied to simulate our ability to meet liquidity needs under adverse conditions. Liquidity ratios are also calculated and reviewed on a regular basis. While those ratios are merely indicators and are not measures of actual liquidity, they are monitored closely and we are focused on maintaining adequate liquidity resources to draw upon should unexpected needs arise.

The Company, on occasion, experiences cash needs as the result of loan growth, deposit outflows, asset purchases or liability repayments. To meet short-term needs, the Company can borrow overnight funds from other financial institutions, draw advances against Federal Home Loan Bank lines of credit, or solicit brokered deposits if deposits are not immediately obtainable from local sources. Availability on lines of credit from correspondent banks, including the FHLB, totaled $206 million at June 30, 2014. An additional $212 million in credit is available from the Federal Home Loan Bank if the Company pledges sufficient additional collateral and maintains the required amount of FHLB stock. The Company is also eligible to borrow approximately $55 million at the Federal Reserve Discount Window, if necessary, based on pledged assets at June 30, 2014. Furthermore, funds can be obtained by drawing down the Company’s correspondent bank deposit accounts, or by liquidating unpledged investments or other readily saleable assets. In addition, the Company can raise immediate cash for temporary needs by selling under agreement to repurchase those investments in its portfolio which are not pledged as collateral. As of June 30, 2014, unpledged debt securities plus pledged securities in excess of current pledging requirements comprised $353 million of the Company’s investment balances, up from $325 million at December 31, 2013. Other forms of balance sheet liquidity include but are not necessarily limited to any outstanding fed funds sold and vault cash. The Company has a higher level of actual balance sheet liquidity than might otherwise be the case, since we utilize a letter of credit from the FHLB rather than investment securities for certain pledging requirements. The FHLB letter of credit, which is backed by loans that are pledged to the FHLB by the Company, totaled $88 million at June 30, 2014. Management is of the opinion that available investments and other potentially liquid assets, along with the standby funding sources it has arranged, are more than sufficient to meet the Company’s current and anticipated short-term liquidity needs.

The Company’s net loans to assets and available investments to assets ratios were 60% and 21%, respectively, at June 30, 2014, as compared to internal policy guidelines of “less than 78%” and “greater than 3%.” Other liquidity ratios reviewed periodically by management and the Board include net loans to total deposits and wholesale funding to total assets (including ratios and sub-limits for the various components comprising wholesale funding), which were well within policy guidelines at June 30, 2014. Strong growth in core deposits and relatively high levels of potentially liquid investments have had a positive impact on our liquidity position in recent periods, although no assurance can be provided that our liquidity will continue at current robust levels.

The holding company’s primary uses of funds are shareholder dividends and ordinary operating expenses, and its primary source of funds is dividends from the Bank since the holding company does not conduct regular banking operations. Management anticipates that there will be sufficient earnings at the Bank to provide dividends to the holding company to meet its funding requirements for the foreseeable future. Both the holding company and the Bank are subject to legal and regulatory limitations on dividend payments, as outlined in Item 5(c) Dividends in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission Form.

INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT

Market risk arises from changes in interest rates, exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. The Company does not engage in the trading of financial instruments, nor does it have exposure to currency exchange rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily that of interest rate risk, and we have established policies and procedures to monitor and limit our earnings and balance sheet exposure to changes in interest rates. The principal objective of interest rate risk management is to manage the financial components of the Company’s balance sheet in a manner that will optimize the risk/reward equation for earnings and capital under a variety of interest rate scenarios. To identify areas of potential exposure to interest rate changes, we perform earnings simulations and calculate our market value of portfolio equity under varying interest rate scenarios every month.

We use commercially-available modeling software to simulate the effects of potential interest rate changes on our net interest income. The model imports relevant information for the Company’s financial instruments and incorporates management’s assumptions on pricing, duration, and optionality for anticipated new volumes. Various rate scenarios, consisting of key rate and yield curve projections, are then applied in order to calculate the expected effect of a given interest rate change on projected interest income and interest expense. The rate projections can be shocked (an immediate and parallel change in all base rates, up or down), ramped (an incremental increase or decrease in rates over a specified time period), economic (based on current trends and econometric models) or stable (unchanged from current actual levels).

We use eight standard interest rate scenarios in conducting our simulations: “stable,” upward shocks of 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points, and downward shocks of 100, 200, and 300 basis points. Pursuant to policy guidelines, we typically attempt to limit the projected 12-month decline in net interest income relative to the stable rate scenario to no more than 5% for a 100 basis point (b.p.) shock, 10% for a 200 b.p. shock, 15% for a 300 b.p. shock, and 20% for a 400 b.p. shock in interest rates. As of June 30, 2014 the Company had the following estimated net interest income sensitivity profile, without factoring in any potential negative impact on spreads resulting from competitive pressures or credit quality deterioration:

Immediate Change in Rate

-300 b.p.

-200 b.p.

-100 b.p.

+100 b.p.

+200 b.p.

+300 b.p.

+400 b.p.

Change in Net Int. Inc. (in $000’s)

-$11,517

-$8,127

-$4,287

+$1,176

+$2,102

+$2,813

+$3,148

% Change

-22.09%

-15.59%

-8.22%

+2.26%

+4.03%

+5.39%

+6.04%

Our current simulations indicate that the Company has an asset-sensitive profile, meaning that net interest income increases in rising interest rate scenarios but a drop in interest rates could have a negative impact. The Company’s increasing balance of lower-cost non-maturity deposits would typically lead to further improvement in net interest income in rising rate scenarios, but that impact has been counteracted in recent periods by a growing proportion of fixed-rate assets.

If there were an immediate and sustained downward adjustment of 100 basis points in interest rates, all else being equal, net interest income over the next twelve months would likely be around $4.287 million lower than in a stable interest rate scenario, for a negative variance of 8.22%. The unfavorable variance increases when rates drop 200 or 300 basis points, due to the fact that certain deposit rates are already relatively low (on NOW accounts and savings accounts, for example), and will hit a natural floor of close to zero while some variable-rate loan yields continue to drop. This effect is exacerbated by accelerated prepayments on fixed-rate loans and mortgage-backed securities when rates decline, although rate floors on some of our variable-rate loans partially offset other negative pressures. While we view declining interest rates as highly unlikely, the potential percentage reduction in net interest income exceeds our internal policy guidelines in declining interest rate scenarios and we will continue to monitor our interest rate risk profile and take corrective action as deemed appropriate.

Net interest income would likely improve by $1.176 million, or 2.26%, if interest rates were to increase by 100 basis points relative to a stable interest rate scenario, with the favorable variance expanding the higher interest rates rise. The initial increase in rising rate scenarios will likely be limited to some extent by the fact that many of our variable-rate loans are currently at rate floors, resulting in a re-pricing lag while variable rates are increasing to floored levels, but the Company still appears to be well-positioned to benefit from the eventuality of an upward shift in the yield curve.

The economic value (or “fair value”) of financial instruments on the Company’s balance sheet will also vary under the interest rate scenarios previously discussed, and these variances are modeled using the same software that is utilized for net interest income simulations. The difference between the projected fair value of the Company’s financial assets and the fair value of its financial liabilities is referred to as the economic value of equity (EVE), and changes in EVE under different interest rate scenarios are effectively a gauge of the Company’s longer-term exposure to interest rate risk. Fair values for financial instruments are estimated by discounting projected cash flows (principal and interest) at projected replacement interest rates for each account type, while the fair value of non-financial accounts is assumed to equal their book value for all rate scenarios. An economic value simulation is a static measure utilizing balance sheet accounts at a given point in time, and the measurement can change substantially over time as the characteristics of the Company’s balance sheet evolve and as interest rate and yield curve assumptions are updated.

The change in economic value under different interest rate scenarios depends on the characteristics of each class of financial instrument, including stated interest rates or spreads relative to current or projected market-level interest rates or spreads, the likelihood of principal prepayments, whether contractual interest rates are fixed or floating, and the average remaining time to maturity. As a general rule, fixed-rate financial assets become more valuable in declining rate scenarios and less valuable in rising rate scenarios, while fixed-rate financial liabilities gain in value as interest rates rise and lose value as interest rates decline. The longer the duration of the financial instrument, the greater the impact a rate change will have on its value. In our economic value simulations, estimated prepayments are factored in for financial instruments with stated maturity dates, and decay rates for non-maturity deposits are projected based on historical patterns and management’s best estimates. We have found that model results are highly sensitive to changes in assumed decay rates for non-maturity deposits, in particular. The table below shows estimated changes in the Company’s EVE as of June 30, 2014, under different interest rate scenarios relative to a base case of current interest rates:

Immediate Change in Rate

-300 b.p.

-200 b.p.

-100 b.p.

+100 b.p.

+200 b.p.

+300 b.p.

Change in EVE (in $000’s)

-$36,860

-$59,484

-$25,053

+$48,345

+$64,944

+$76,379

% Change

-10.98%

-17.72%

-7.46%

+14.40%

+19.34%

+22.75%

The table shows that our EVE will generally deteriorate in declining rate scenarios but will benefit from rising rates. While still negative relative to the base case, we see a favorable swing in EVE as interest rates drop more than 200 basis points. This apparent anomaly is due to the relative durations of our fixed-rate assets and fixed-rate liabilities, combined with the optionality inherent in our balance sheet. As noted previously, however, management is of the opinion that the probability of a significant rate decline is low.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

At June 30, 2014 the Company had total shareholders’ equity of $186.9 million, comprised of $65.3 million in common stock, $2.5 million in additional paid-in capital, $115.6 million in retained earnings, and an accumulated other comprehensive gain of $3.5 million. Total shareholders’ equity at the end of 2013 was $181.7 million. The increase in shareholders’ equity during the first six months of 2014 was due in large part to the addition of $8.0 million in net earnings less $2.3 million in dividends paid. The increase in equity was enhanced by a $3.1 increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, which represents the increase in the unrealized gain on our investment securities net of the tax effect. The change in equity in the first half of 2014 was also impacted by the exercise of stock options and the expensing of unvested options, and it includes a reduction of $4.3 million resulting from the Company’s stock repurchases.

The Company uses a variety of measures to evaluate its capital adequacy, including risk-based capital and leverage ratios that are calculated separately for the Company and the Bank. Management reviews these capital measurements on a quarterly basis and takes appropriate action to help ensure that they meet or surpass established internal and external guidelines. The following table sets forth the Company’s and the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios as of the dates indicated.

Regulatory Capital Ratios

	June 30,	December 31,
	2014	2013
Sierra Bancorp
Total Capital to Total Risk-weighted Assets	20.10%	21.67%
Tier 1 Capital to Total Risk-weighted Assets	18.94%	20.39%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio	13.87%	14.37%

Bank of the Sierra
Total Capital to Total Risk-weighted Assets	19.35%	21.35%
Tier 1 Capital to Total Risk-weighted Assets	18.24%	20.11%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio	13.36%	14.18%

Despite a higher level of risk-based capital, a proportionately larger increase in assets and unused commitments caused regulatory capital ratios to decline in the first half of 2014. Even though our capital ratios have declined they remain strong relative to industry averages, and at June 30, 2014 they are well above the threshold for the Company and the Bank to be classified as “well capitalized,” the highest rating of the categories defined under the Bank Holding Company Act and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991. Refer to Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13 – Recent Developments, for a summary of changes to risk-based capital calculations which have been adopted by federal banking regulators. We do not foresee any circumstances that would cause the Company or the Bank to be less than well capitalized, although no assurance can be given that this will not occur.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 3

QUALITATIVE & QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES

ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information concerning quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk is included in Part I, Item 2 above. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Market Risk Management.”

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 4

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”) have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report was being prepared.

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred in the second quarter of 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, any liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operation.

ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS

There were no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The Company’s current stock repurchase plan became effective July 1, 2003 and has no expiration date. The plan was effectively dormant from April 2008 until January 2013, at which time the Company’s Board decided to reactivate the stock repurchase plan and increase the number of shares authorized and available for repurchase to a total of 700,000 shares. The reactivation does not provide assurance that a specific quantity of shares will be repurchased.

While in general the Company has ultimate discretion with regard to potential share repurchases based upon market conditions and any other relevant considerations, all of the Company’s repurchases of its common stock during the second quarter of 2014 were executed pursuant to a plan established by the Company in accordance with SEC Rule 10b5-1. This enabled us to continue to repurchase stock through the trading blackout for insiders, but imposed volume restrictions and limited our ability to change pricing and other parameters outlined in the 10b5-1 plan. The following table provides information concerning the Company’s stock repurchase transactions during the second quarter of 2014:

	April		May		June
Total shares purchased		66,100		78,460		46,900
Average per share price	$	15.96	$	15.67	$	15.73
Number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan or program		66,100		78,460		46,900
Maximum number of shares remaining for purchase under a plan or program		555,260		476,800		429,900

ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable

ITEM 4: (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

Item 5: Other Information

Not applicable

Item 6: Exhibits

Exhibit #	Description
2.1	Agreement and Plan of Consolidation by and among Sierra Bancorp, Bank of the Sierra and Santa Clara Valley Bank, N.A., dated as of July 17, 2014 (1)
3.1	Restated Articles of Incorporation of Sierra Bancorp (2)
3.2	Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company (3)
10.1	1998 Stock Option Plan (4)
10.2	Salary Continuation Agreement for Kenneth R. Taylor (5)
10.3	Salary Continuation Agreement for James C. Holly (5)
10.4	Salary Continuation Agreement and Split Dollar Agreement for James F. Gardunio (6)
10.5	Split Dollar Agreement for Kenneth R. Taylor (7)
10.6	Split Dollar Agreement and Amendment thereto for James C. Holly (7)
10.7	Director Retirement Agreement and Split dollar Agreement for Vincent Jurkovich (7)
10.8	Director Retirement Agreement and Split dollar Agreement for Robert Fields (7)
10.9	Director Retirement Agreement and Split dollar Agreement for Gordon Woods (7)
10.10	Director Retirement Agreement and Split dollar Agreement for Morris Tharp (7)
10.11	Director Retirement Agreement and Split dollar Agreement for Albert Berra (7)
10.12	401 Plus Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (7)
10.13	Indenture dated as of March 17, 2004 between U.S. Bank N.A., as Trustee, and Sierra Bancorp, as Issuer (8)
10.14	Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Sierra Statutory Trust II, dated as of March 17, 2004 (8)
10.15	Guarantee Agreement between Sierra Bancorp and U.S. Bank National Association dated as of March 17, 2004 (8)
10.16	Indenture dated as of June 15, 2006 between Wilmington Trust Co., as Trustee, and Sierra Bancorp, as Issuer (9)
10.17	Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Sierra Capital Trust III, dated as of June 15, 2006 (9)
10.18	Guarantee Agreement between Sierra Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of June 15, 2006 (9)
10.19	2007 Stock Incentive Plan (10)
10.20	Sample Retirement Agreement Entered into with Each Non-Employee Director Effective January 1, 2007 (11)
10.21	Salary Continuation Agreement for Kevin J. McPhaill (11)
10.22	First Amendment to the Salary Continuation Agreement for Kenneth R. Taylor (11)
10.23	Second Amendment to the Salary Continuation Agreement for Kenneth R. Taylor (12)
11	Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings (13)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Section 302 Certification)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Section 302 Certification)
32	Certification of Periodic Financial Report (Section 906 Certification)

___________________________

(1)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 18, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(2)

Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 7, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.

(3)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

(4)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Registration Statement of Sierra Bancorp on Form S-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) (Registration No. 333-53178) on January 4, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.

(5)

Filed as Exhibits 10.5 and 10.7 to the Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 15, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

(6)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

(7)

Filed as Exhibits 10.10, 10.12, and 10.15 through 10.20 to the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(8)

Filed as Exhibits 10.9 through 10.11 to the Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 14, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.

(9)

Filed as Exhibits 10.26 through 10.28 to the Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 9, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(10)

Filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

(11)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 8, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

(12)

Filed as an Exhibit to the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(13)

Computation of earnings per share is incorporated by reference to Note 6 of the Financial Statements included herein.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized:

August 7, 2014	/s/ James C. Holly
Date	SIERRA BANCORP
	James C. Holly
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

August 7, 2014	/s/ Kenneth R. Taylor
Date	SIERRA BANCORP
	Kenneth R. Taylor
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)