UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
(Commission File Number) 001-10593
ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 11-2481903 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1450 Broadway, New York, New York 10018
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
(212) 730-0030
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $.001 Par Value |
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (NASDAQ Global Market) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Emerging Growth Company | ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the close of business on June 30, 2017 was approximately $386.97 million. As of April 20, 2018, 65,496,145 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
None
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the “Amendment”) amends the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 14, 2018 (the “Original Filing”). We are filing this Amendment to amend Part III of the Original Filing to include the information required by and not included in Part III of the Original Filing because we do not intend to file our definitive proxy statement within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. In connection with the filing of this Amendment and pursuant to the rules of the SEC, we are including with this Amendment certain new certifications by our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Accordingly, Item 15 of Part IV has also been amended to reflect the filing of these new certifications.
Except as described above, no other changes have been made to the Original Filing. The Original Filing continues to speak as of the date of the Original Filing and we have not updated the disclosures contained therein to reflect any events which occurred at a date subsequent to the filing of the Original Filing, other than as expressly indicated in this Amendment. In this Amendment, unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “Company”, “Iconix”, “we”, “us”, “our”, or similar pronouns refer to Iconix Brand Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Other defined terms used in this Amendment but not defined herein shall have the meaning specified for such terms in the Original Filing.
2 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3 |
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The following information includes information each director and executive officer has given us about his or her age, his or her principal occupation and business experience for at least the past five years, and the names of other publicly-held companies of which he or she currently serves as a director or has served as a director during the past five years. Qualifications and skills of our directors that contribute to our Board of Directors’ effectiveness as a whole and which make them suitable to serve on our Board of Directors are described in the following paragraphs.
Our executive officers and directors, and their respective ages and positions, are as follows:
Name | Age | Position(s) | ||
John N. Haugh | 55 | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
David K. Jones | 48 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
Jason Schaefer | 43 | Executive Vice President and General Counsel | ||
F. Peter Cuneo | 74 | Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
Drew Cohen1,2 | 49 | Lead Director | ||
Mark Friedman2,3 | 54 | Director | ||
Sue Gove2,3 | 59 | Director | ||
James A. Marcum1,2 | 58 | Director | ||
Sanjay Khosla3 | 66 | Director | ||
Kenneth Slutsky1,3 | 64 | Director |
(1) | Member of Governance/Nominating Committee. |
(2) | Member of Audit Committee. |
(3) | Member of Compensation Committee. |
John N. Haugh has served as a Director and as our President since February 23, 2016. He has also served as our Chief Executive Officer since April 1, 2016. Prior to joining our Company, from July 2011 to February 2016, Mr. Haugh worked for Luxottica Retail North America, a division of Luxottica Group SpA, the leading optical and sunglass wholesaler and retailer in the world, most recently in the role of President of Sun, Luxury and Retail Services. From March 2009 through July 2011, Mr. Haugh was the President and Chief Merchandising Officer for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. Earlier in his career, Mr. Haugh held general management, marketing, sales and operational roles with several companies including Mars, Inc., Payless ShoeSource, Inc., Universal Studios, Inc., Carlson Companies, Inc. and General Mills, Inc. Mr. Haugh previously served on the Board of Directors of Aeropostale, Inc., including as chairman of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Aeropostale and each of its subsidiaries filed for bankruptcy in May 2016. Mr. Haugh also serves on the Board of Trustees for the International Council of Shopping Centers. Mr. Haugh obtained a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1985 and an MBA from the International Institute of Management Development (IMD) in Lausanne, Switzerland in 1991. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Haugh’s broad executive background, brand building and brand management expertise and experience in corporate strategy, as well as his experience as a director of a public company, make him well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.
David K. Jones has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2015. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Jones served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Penske Automotive Group, Inc. from May 2011 to June 2015. Previously, Mr. Jones served in various capacities for Penske Automotive Group, Inc., including as Vice President—Financial Compliance and Controls from April 2006 to May 2011 and Director of Financial Reporting from 2003 to April 2006. Prior to joining Penske, Mr. Jones was a Senior Manager at Andersen LLP, an accounting and financial advisory services firm, which he joined in 1991. Mr. Jones received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Accounting from Seton Hall University in 1991.
Jason Schaefer has served as our Executive Vice President and General Counsel since joining our company in September 2013. From May 2008 until September 2013, Mr. Schaefer served as General Counsel of Pegasus Capital Advisors, L.P., a private equity fund. From March 2006 to May 2008, he advised on merger and acquisition transactions in both the private and public space at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld LLP. Prior to that time, Mr. Schaefer was an associate in the corporate group of Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton and Garrison LLP, an international law firm. Mr. Schaefer received his Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Brooklyn Law School in 2001 and a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from the University at Buffalo in 1996.
4 |
F. Peter Cuneo has served as our Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors since December 2017 and from April 2016 until December 2016. Since August 2015, and while not serving as Executive Chairman, Mr. Cuneo has served as our Chairman of the Board. He also served as our Interim Chief Executive Officer from August 2015 until April 2016. Mr. Cuneo has served on our Board of Directors since October 2006. From June 2004 through December 2009 Mr. Cuneo served as the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Marvel Entertainment, Inc. (“Marvel Entertainment”), a publicly traded entertainment company active in motion pictures, television, publishing, licensing and toys, and prior thereto, he served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Marvel Entertainment from July 1999 to December 2002. Mr. Cuneo has also served as the Chairman of Cuneo & Co., L.L.C., a private investment firm, since July 1997 and previously served on the Board of Directors of WaterPik Technologies, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange company engaged in designing, manufacturing and marketing health care products, swimming pool products and water-heating systems, prior to its sale in 2006. From October 2004 to December 2005, he served on the Board of Directors of Majesco Entertainment Company, a provider of video game products primarily for the family oriented, mass market consumer. Mr. Cuneo received a Bachelor of Science degree from Alfred University in 1967 and currently serves as the Chairman of the Alfred University Board of Trustees. Mr. Cuneo received a Masters degree in business administration from Harvard Business School in 1973. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Cuneo’s extensive business and financial background and significant experience as an executive of Marvel Entertainment, an owner and licensor of iconic intellectual property, contributes important expertise to our Board of Directors.
Drew Cohen has served on our Board of Directors since April 2004. From August 2015 until April 2016, and since September 2016, Mr. Cohen has served as our Lead Director. Since 2007 he has been the President of Music Theatre International (“MTI”) and currently serves as its Chief Executive Officer and President. MTI represents the dramatic performing rights of classic properties, such as “West Side Story” and “Fiddler on the Roof,” and licenses over 50,000 performances a year around the world. Before joining MTI in September 2002, Mr. Cohen was, from July 2001, the Director of Investments for Big Wave NV, an investment management company, and, prior to that, General Manager for GlassNote Records, an independent record company. Mr. Cohen received a Bachelor of Science degree from Tufts University in 1990, his Juris Doctor degree from Fordham Law School in 1993, and a Masters degree in business administration from Harvard Business School in 2001. The Board believes that Mr. Cohen’s legal and business background, and experience as an executive in an industry heavily involved in the licensing business, make him well suited to serve on our Board.
Mark Friedman has served on our Board of Directors since October 2006. Mr. Friedman has been a Managing Partner at The Retail Tracker, an investment advisory and consulting firm since May 2006. From 1996 to 2006 Mr. Friedman was with Merrill Lynch, serving in various capacities including group head of its U.S. equity research retail team where he specialized in analyzing and evaluating specialty retailers in the apparel, accessory and home goods segments. Prior to joining Merrill Lynch, he specialized in similar areas for Lehman Brothers Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. Mr. Friedman has been ranked on the Institutional Investor All-American Research Team as one of the top-rated sector analysts. He received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Michigan in 1986 and a Masters degree in business administration from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania in 1990. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Friedman’s extensive business background and investment banking experience adds key experience and viewpoints to our Board of Directors.
Sue Gove has served on our Board of Directors since October 2014. Ms. Gove has been the President of Excelsior Advisors, LLC since May 2014 and has also been retained as a Senior Advisor at Alvarez & Marsal. Ms. Gove had served as the President of Golf Smith International Holdings, Inc. from February 2012 through April 2014 and as Chief Executive Officer from October 2012 through April 2014. Previously, she was Chief Operating Officer of Golfsmith International Holdings, Inc. from September 2008 through October 2012, Executive Vice President from September 2008 through February 2012 and Chief Financial Officer from March 2009 through July 2012. Ms. Gove previously had been a self-employed consultant from April 2006 until September 2008, serving clients in specialty retail and private equity. She was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Zale Corporation from 2002 to March 2006 and a director of Zale Corporation from 2004 to 2006. She was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Zale Corporation from 1998 to 2002 and remained in the position of Chief Financial Officer until 2003. Ms. Gove served as a director of AutoZone, Inc. from 2005 to 2017, and has served as a director of Logitech International since September 2015 and a director of Tailored Brands, Inc. since August 2017. Ms. Gove received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Texas at Austin. The Board believes that Ms. Gove's financial background and extensive experience in executive management positions with leading retailers adds key insight and knowledge to our Board.
James A. Marcum has served on our Board of Directors since October 2007. Since January 2016, Mr. Marcum has served as an Operating Partner and Consultant for an affiliate of Apollo Global Management Holdings, LLC. Prior to that, Mr. Marcum served as an Operating Partner and Operating Executive of Tri-Artisan Capital Partners, LLC, a merchant banking firm, positions he held from December 2014 to January 2016. From August 2013 to December 2014, Mr. Marcum served as Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Heartland Automotive Services, Inc., the nation’s largest franchisee of Jiffy Lubes. From February 2010 through December 31, 2012, Mr. Marcum served as the Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Central Parking Corporation, a nationwide provider of professional parking management. From September 2008 to January 2010, Mr. Marcum served as Vice Chairman, Acting President and Chief Executive Officer of Circuit City Stores, Inc., a specialty retailer of consumer electronics where Mr. Marcum had also served as a member of the Board of Directors since June 2008. Circuit City Stores, Inc. filed for bankruptcy in November 2008. Prior to Circuit City Stores Inc., Mr. Marcum served in several other notable board capacities and senior executive roles including roles as Lead Director, CEO, COO and CFO for a variety of nationwide specialty retailers both public and private. He received a Bachelor of Science degree from Southern Connecticut State University in accounting and economics in 1980. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Marcum’s contributions to the Board of Directors are well served by his extensive business background and his experience as a corporate executive of national retail establishments.
5 |
Sanjay Khosla has served on our Board of Directors since September 2016. Since June 2013, Mr. Khosla has served as a Senior Fellow at Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University. Since April 2013, Mr. Khosla has served as a Senior Advisor to Boston Consulting Group, a global management consulting firm advising on business strategy. Since April 2013, Mr. Khosla has been CEO of Bunnik LLC, a management consulting firm. From January 2007 to March 2013, Mr. Khosla was President of Developing Markets of Mondelez International, a global snacking and foods brand company formerly known as Kraft Foods, Inc. Previously, Mr. Khosla was Managing Director of Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd., a multi-national dairy company based in New Zealand, from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Khosla served in various senior executive capacities at Unilever, Inc., a global consumer products company from 1977 to 2004. Mr. Khosla has been a director of Zoetis Inc. since 2013 and was formerly a director of NIIT Ltd. prior to his resignation therefrom in October 2017. From 2008 until June 2015, Mr. Khosla served as a director of Best Buy Inc. Mr. Khosla received a Bachelor of Technology degree, with honors, from the Indian Institute of Technology in electrical engineering in 1973. The Board believes that Mr. Khosla’s deep knowledge of branding and consumer marketing, as well as his extensive executive and director leadership experience, are a great benefit to our Board.
Kenneth W. Slutsky has served on our Board of Directors since November 2016. Since June 2013, Mr. Slutsky has served as Managing Director and a partner at Saybrook Capital and has been an advisory board member there since 2002. Previously, Mr. Slutsky served in various senior leadership positions include Vice Chairman of Candle Corporation, a provider of systems management software from 1990 to 2000 and senior leadership roles at Casey Company and Kern Oil and Refining Company from 1979 to 1991. Additionally, he has been a member of Wedgewood Corporation’s board of directors since January 2012 and was a member of Axia Holding Corp’s board from April 2015 until its sale in 2017. Previously he served on Western Emulsions’ board from January 2012 until the Company was sold in December 2015. Previously, Mr. Slutsky served on an advisory board of Northwest Airlines, the boards of directors of AT Curd Builders and Red Cloud Capital and the board of trustees of The Rand Corporation Center for Middle Eastern Policy. Mr. Slutsky graduated from Bowdoin College, Magna Cum Laude, in 1976 and received a Juris Doctor from Emory University in 1979. The Board believes that Mr. Slutsky’s high level of expertise in business and corporate finance matters will be extremely valuable to our Board.
Appointment of officers
Our Board of Directors appoints the officers of the Company on an annual basis and its officers serve until their successors are duly elected and qualified, unless earlier removed by the Board of Directors. No family relationships exist among any of our officers or directors.
Election of directors
Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of eight directors, six of which are independent directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to the directors then serving are elected to serve from the time of their election and qualification until the next annual meeting following their election or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. All eight of our current directors have been elected to serve until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2018.
Agreement with Huber
As previously disclosed, on September 26, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with Huber Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“HCM”), and Joseph R. Huber (collectively with HCM, “Huber”) which, as of the date of the Agreement, beneficially owned approximately 6,991,079 shares, or 12.45%, of the Company’s outstanding common stock. As disclosed below under “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” as of April 20, 2018, Huber beneficially owned zero shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The following is a summary of the material terms of the Agreement. The summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 28, 2016.
Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company agreed that (i) the Board would nominate Mr. Slutsky, an independent director candidate recommended by Huber, on the Company’s slate of directors for election to the Board at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on November 4, 2016 (the “2016 Annual Meeting”), (ii) the Company’s slate of directors for election to the Board at the 2016 Annual Meeting would consist of nine (9) directors and (iii) the Company would recommend and solicit proxies for the election of all such nominees at the 2016 Annual Meeting.
6 |
The Agreement further provided that Huber would appear in person or by proxy at each annual or special meeting of stockholders held during the period from the date of the Agreement until the date that is fifteen (15) business days prior to the deadline for submission of stockholder nominations for the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Standstill Period”) pursuant to the Company’s Restated and Amended By-Laws and vote all of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned, or deemed beneficially owned, by Huber (i) in favor of the slate of directors nominated by the Board and (ii) against the removal of any member of the Board.
Huber also agreed to certain other customary standstill provisions during the Standstill Period, including, among others, that it would not nominate any person for election at the 2016 Annual Meeting, submit proposals for consideration or otherwise bring any business before the 2016 Annual Meeting, nor engage in certain activities related to “withhold” or similar campaigns with respect to the 2016 Annual Meeting.
The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee did not receive any other recommendations for director nominees at the Annual Meeting from any of the Company’s stockholders beneficially owning more than five percent (5%) of the Company’s outstanding common stock.
Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert
Our Board of Directors has appointed an Audit Committee each of whose members is, and is required to be, an “independent director” under the Listing Rules of NASDAQ. The members of our Audit Committee are Ms. Gove and Messrs. Cohen, Marcum and Freidman, and Ms. Gove currently serves as its chairperson. In addition to being an “independent director” under the Listing Rules of NASDAQ, each member of the Audit Committee is an independent director under applicable SEC rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our Board of Directors has also determined that Ms. Gove is our “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined under applicable SEC rules and NASDAQ Listing Rules, serving on the Audit Committee.
Our Audit Committee’s responsibilities include:
• | appointing, replacing, overseeing and compensating the work of a firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements; |
• | discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm and reviewing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our interim and year-end operating results, which includes matters required to be discussed under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard 1301 - Communications with Audit Committees; |
• | considering the adequacy of our internal accounting controls and audit procedures; |
• | reviewing and approving related party transactions (as defined by Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K) entered into by the Company, and discussing with management the business rationale for any such transactions and determining whether public disclosure is required; |
• | approving (or, as permitted, pre-approving) all audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm; and |
• | receiving and reviewing written disclosures on independence required by PCAOB Rule 3526. |
Risk Management
Our Board of Directors has an active role, as a whole and also at the committee level, in overseeing management of the Company’s risks. Our Board of Directors regularly reviews information regarding the Company’s credit, liquidity, proposed acquisitions and operations, as well as other risks associated with the Company’s business.
The Company’s Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s executive compensation plans and arrangements, as well as all of the Company’s benefit plans. The Audit Committee oversees management of financial risks and potential conflicts of interest with related parties. The Governance/Nominating Committee manages risks associated with the independence of our Board of Directors. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, our entire Board is regularly informed by members of management and through committee reports, or otherwise, about such risks.
7 |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than 10% owners are required by certain SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms filed by them. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, we believe that during 2017, there was compliance with the filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% common stockholders, other than two reports that were not filed within two business days that were subsequently filed on behalf of Messrs. Jones and Schaefer relating to the surrender of 4,072 shares and 3,284 shares, respectively, in payment of tax liability incident to the vesting of RSUs on March 30, 2017.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our officers, directors and employees. Copies of our code of business conduct and ethics are available, without charge, upon written request directed to our corporate secretary at Iconix Brand Group, Inc., 1450 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. Our code of business conduct is also available on our website, www.iconixbrand.com.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
In 2015 and 2016, our Board of Directors placed a priority on holistically reviewing our compensation and governance practices. The goal of that review was to establish policies that provide appropriate compensation to attract and retain strong leadership, while ensuring the overall compensation program was aligned with both the Company’s performance and stockholders’ best interests. As a result of this review, the Company redesigned its compensation programs and made numerous other governance and compensation changes in 2015, 2016 and 2017. Many of these changes are directly responsive to feedback previously received from our investors, and also incorporate generally accepted market practices, as evaluated by our compensation consultant.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
At our 2017 annual meeting, our stockholders voted in favor of (i) the non-binding advisory resolution that future advisory stockholder votes on compensation of the Company’s named executive officers occur every year and (ii) the non-binding advisory resolution on named executive officer compensation. The Company and the Compensation Committee continue to review our policies and programs and consider additional changes, where appropriate.
Introduction
The purpose of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis is to provide the information necessary for understanding the compensation philosophy, policies and decisions that are material to the compensation of our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our other most highly compensated executive officers (we refer to these officers as our “named executive officers”) during 2017.
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis will place in context the information regarding our 2017 named executive officers contained in the tables and accompanying narratives that follow this discussion.
In 2017, our named executive officers were:
John N. Haugh | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
F. Peter Cuneo(1) | Executive Chairman of the Board (Former Chairman; former Interim Chief Executive Officer and Director; Director since 2006) |
David K. Jones | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Jason Schaefer | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
(1) | Mr. Cuneo’s service as Executive Chairman of the Board commenced on December 18, 2017. |
8 |
Roles of the Board and Compensation Committee in Compensation Decisions
Compensation of our named executive officers has been determined by the Board of Directors pursuant to recommendations made by the Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things, reviewing and making recommendations as to the compensation of our executive officers; administering our equity incentive and stock option plans; reviewing and making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to incentive compensation and equity incentive plans; and setting our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation based on the achievement of corporate objectives.
Effective October 2015, the Compensation Committee retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) as its independent, third-party compensation consultant for advice and assistance on executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of FW Cook pursuant to the NASDAQ listing standards and SEC rules and is not aware of any conflict of interest that would prevent FW Cook from providing independent advice to the Committee concerning executive compensation matters.
Objectives of our Executive Compensation Program
The Company’s goals for its executive compensation program are to:
• | Attract, motivate and retain a talented, entrepreneurial and creative team of executives who will provide leadership for the Company’s success in dynamic and competitive markets. |
• | Align pay with performance as well as with the long-term interests of stockholders by linking payouts to pre-determined performance measures that promote long-term stockholder value. |
• | Promote stability in the executive team and establish continuity of the service of named executive officers, so that they will contribute to, and be a part of, the Company’s long-term success. |
Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program
Following is a summary of the key features of our compensation program, which demonstrates how each feature furthers the overall
goals of our compensation philosophy.
What we do
Pay for Performance. Our 2017 annual bonus program was based on pre-established financial goals. We have adopted the LTIP, which provides for grants that are tied to our long-term business goals. Because these PSUs are generally earned only at the end of the three-year performance period, they remain “at risk” (over the term) based on performance metrics.
Clawback Policy. We have adopted a clawback policy that applies if there is a restatement of our financial statements that is required, within the previous three years, to correct accounting errors due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws. This applies to equity as well as cash payments that were paid based on performance metrics. During 2016, we clawed back equity and cash payments from former executives pursuant to the policy.
Anti-Pledging Policy. We have adopted a policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from pledging any additional shares of the Company’s common stock following October 20, 2015.
Stock Ownership Guidelines. The Company has adopted stock ownership guidelines for its directors, named executive officers and all other direct reports to the Chief Executive Officer to provide for ownership maintenance of the Company’s equity. To be consistent with market practice, the Compensation Committee recently amended the guidelines to allow for RSUs, net of shares to cover taxes at a 40% assumed tax rate, to count toward ownership levels.
Anti-Hedging Policy. We have a policy prohibiting directors and named executive officers from engaging in hedging transactions, which include puts, calls and other derivative securities, with respect to the Company’s equity securities.
“Double Trigger” Change in Control Provision. Our Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (referred to herein as the “2016 Plan”), and its predecessor plan, the Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”), provide for “double trigger” change in control provisions, which provide that unvested equity awards do not accelerate unless, within 24 months following such change in control, the participant is terminated without cause or leaves for good reason.
9 |
Independence of our Compensation Committee and Advisor. The Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, utilizes the services of FW Cook, as its independent, third party compensation consultant. FW Cook reports to the Compensation Committee, does not perform any other services for the Company, and, to the Compensation Committee’s knowledge, has no economic or other ties to the Company or the management team that could compromise its independence or objectivity.
What we don’t do
No gross-ups. We do not have any provisions requiring the Company to gross-up salary or bonus compensation to cover taxes owed by our executives.
No Excess Perquisites and Limited Retirement Benefits. We have a 401k program and have never had a defined benefit plan. We do not maintain any supplemental executive retirement plans or other pension benefits. We do not provide any excessive perquisites.
No option repricing or exchanges without stockholder approval; No “liberal” share recycling. We have not engaged in the activities below and they are prohibited by both the 2016 Plan and the 2009 Plan:
• | Repricing options; and |
• | Buying out underwater options for cash. |
No dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested awards. We do not pay dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested RSU awards or unearned PSU awards.
No “catch-up” feature on PSU awards. Commencing with PSU grants made in 2016, we eliminated the “catch up” feature on PSU awards.
Compensation Peer Group
FW Cook assisted the Compensation Committee in identifying public companies against which the Company competes for executive talent – the “Peer Group.”
As a result of Iconix’s unique business model, in which a large portion of our profits are generated through licensing of our brands rather than direct retail sales, Iconix has very few similarly-sized public company competitors. Accordingly, developing the Peer Group required a careful balancing of “typical” peer group criteria such as market capitalization and revenue, as well as business model-specific criteria such as licensing revenue, profitability and operating margin. Based on the foregoing considerations and viewed holistically, the Peer Group is generally comprised of companies in our industry and reflect a portfolio of characteristics relevant to Iconix’s business considerations.
In November 2016 the Compensation Committee reviewed and evaluated the Peer Group and revised it to eliminate companies that were no longer public or no longer fit the appropriate criteria and add replacement companies as necessary, and approved the following revised Peer Group, which was used to measure performance of 2017 PSUs and may be used with respect to other future performance-based awards:
· | Cherokee, Inc. | · | Movado Group, Inc. | ||
· | Choice Hotels | · | Oxford Industries, Inc. | ||
· | Deckers Outdoor Corporation | · | Perry Ellis Inc. | ||
· | Fossil Inc. | · | Sequential Brands Inc. | ||
· | Francesca’s Holdings | · | Steve Madden | ||
· | G-III Apparel Group Ltd. | · | Vera Bradley, Inc. | ||
· | Kate Spade & Co. | · | Vince Holding | ||
· | Meredith Corp. | · | Wolverine World Wide, Inc. |
10 |
The Compensation Committee does not follow a specific formula in making its pay decisions but rather uses the Peer Group data as a frame of reference. The Compensation Committee exercises its judgment by taking into consideration a multitude of important factors such as experience, individual performance and internal pay equity in setting target compensation levels, but actual payouts under our variable incentive plans are primarily determined bas on formulaic outcomes. In addition to Peer Group data, the Compensation Committee also used general industry survey data as an additional reference frame for general market trends.
Elements of Compensation
To accomplish our compensation objectives, our compensation program for 2017 principally consisted of equity compensation granted pursuant to the LTIP, which is the Company’s plan for annual, performance-based, long-term incentive compensation described above, base salaries and cash bonus awards made pursuant to the Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”), which is the Company’s plan for annual, performance-based cash bonuses. These elements were designed to provide a competitive mix of compensation that balanced retention and performance in a simple and straightforward manner. The compensation program was designed to ensure that the named executive officers’ annual target total direct compensation was tied to the Company’s long-term and short-term performance. The Company provides certain limited perquisites to its named executive officers. The Company has no supplemental retirement plan.
Base salary. Base salary represents amounts paid during the fiscal year to named executive officers as direct, fixed compensation under their respective employment agreements (in the case of Messrs. Cuneo and Haugh) or Participation Agreements executed in connection with their participation in the Executive Severance Plan (in the case of Messrs. Jones and Schaefer), for their services to us. Base salaries are used to compensate each named executive officer for day-to-day operations during the year, and to encourage them to perform at their highest levels. We also use our base salary as an incentive to attract top quality executives and other management employees. Moreover, base salary and increases to base salary are intended to recognize the overall experience, position within our Company and expected contributions of each named executive officer to us.
Annual cash bonuses (short-term incentives). We award bonuses to promote the achievement of our short-term, targeted business objectives by providing competitive incentive reward opportunities to our executive officers who can significantly impact our performance towards those objectives. Further, a competitive bonus program enhances our ability to attract, develop and motivate individuals as members of a talented management team. Following its previously disclosed commitment to do so, the Compensation Committee eliminated the historical practice of determining annual cash bonuses on a solely discretionary basis in 2016. Cash bonus awards are currently made pursuant to the Company’s AIP, which requires the achievement of measurable, pre-determined goals in order to be eligible for performance-based cash bonuses as more fully described below.
Equity-based compensation (long-term incentives). Beginning in 2016, annual equity awards were made in the form of RSUs and a target amount of PSUs granted pursuant to the terms of a long-term incentive compensation plan. These grants are designed to compensate our named executive officers for their expected ongoing contributions to our long-term performance.
RSUs - Generally, the RSUs under the LTIP vest in equal installments annually following the date of grant, or a period determined by the Compensation Committee, typically beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
PSUs - PSUs vest upon the Company’s achievement of pre-determined adjusted operating income performance targets at the end of a three-year performance period, or a period determined by the Compensation Committee.
Perquisites and other personal benefits. During 2017, our named executive officers received a limited amount of perquisites and other personal benefits that we paid on their behalf.
Post-termination compensation. We had previously entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers, which were replaced by participation agreements to our Executive Severance Plan (as described herein) in 2017, other than for Mr. Haugh, whose employment agreement continues to be in effect, and Mr. Cuneo, with whom we entered into a new employment agreement. Each of Mr. Haugh’s employment agreement and the participation agreements related to the Executive Severance Plan provide for certain payments and other benefits if the executive’s employment terminated under certain circumstances, including, in the event of a “change in control.” As noted above, we amended our 2009 Plan to implement “double trigger” change in control provisions with respect to equity grants. Our 2016 Plan also contains “double trigger” change in control provisions. These provisions provide that, upon a change in control, as defined in the 2016 Plan, in the event that a successor company assumes or substitutes awards under the 2016 Plan, unvested equity awards do not accelerate unless, within 24 months following such change in control or such shorter period as determined by the Committee, the Plan participant is terminated without cause or leaves for good reason. However, if a successor company in the change in control does not assume or substitute awards under the 2016 Plan, then all outstanding awards would immediately vest. See “Employment Agreements and Executive Severance Plan Participation Agreements” on page 21 and “Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” 27 on page for a description of the severance and change in control benefits pursuant to Mr. Haugh’s employment agreement and the Executive Severance Plan participation agreements for Messrs. Jones and Schaefer.
11 |
Our Named Executive Officers’ Compensation for 2017
2017 Board and Management Updates
Mr. Cuneo’s Appointment
as Executive Chairman in 2017 and related Employment Agreement
On December 18, 2017, the Board appointed Mr. Cuneo, the then-current Chairman of the Board, as Executive Chairman of the Board. As Executive Chairman, Mr. Cuneo is focused on evaluating strategic opportunities, overseeing the financial and legal functions and working towards stabilizing the Company’s balance sheet. Mr. Haugh continues to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and remains focused on the core licensing and brand management functions.
On such date, we entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Cuneo that provides for his employment as our Executive Chairman until the earlier of (i) the date the Company provides
written notice of termination and (ii) the date that is at least 30 days following the date Mr. Cuneo provides notice of termination,
as set forth in such notice. The material terms of Mr. Cuneo’s employment agreement are described below under “Narrative
Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Plan-Based Awards Table—Employment Agreements and Executive Severance Plan
Participation Agreements” on page 21.
Base Salaries
Historically, the base salaries of our named executive officers were determined based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of competitive base salary levels and consistent with the relevant executive’s position, skill set, experience and length of service with the Company. Base salaries of our named executive officers are set forth in their respective Executive Severance Plan participation agreements or employment agreements (as applicable). Base salaries are benchmarked annually by the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of FW Cook, in light of market practices and changes in responsibilities.
None of our named executive officers is eligible for an automatic
base salary increase and no named executive officer received a salary increase for 2017. For more information on base salaries,
please see “Summary Compensation Table” on page 20.
2017 Annual Incentive Plan
In furtherance of its commitment to eliminate the historical practice of determining annual cash bonuses for executives on a solely discretionary basis, in 2017 the Compensation Committee continued its practice, commenced in 2016, of establishing AIP targets for cash bonuses to employees, including named executive officers. These targets were established as a percentage of base salary and, for the named executive officers, were based on the achievement of performance goals weighted as follows: 37.5% Iconix non-GAAP net income, 37.5% Iconix revenue and 25% based on objective criteria specific to the individual. Please see Exhibit 10.78 for detail regarding an unaudited reconciliation from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to non-GAAP amounts for the non-GAAP net income financial measure.
With respect to the revenue and non-GAAP net income performance metrics, the following goals were established by the Compensation Committee and adjusted by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the AIP:(1)
REVENUE PERFORMANCE METRICS
% of Target | Achievement Level ($M) | Payout % | ||||
Less than 90% | Less than $272.53 Million | 0 | % | |||
90% | $272.53 Million | 50 | % | |||
95% | $287.67 Million | 75 | % | |||
100% | $302.81 Million | 100 | % | |||
105% | $317.95 Million | 150 | % | |||
110% | $333.09 Million | 200 | % | |||
ACTUAL ACHIEVEMENT | $279.00 Million | 60.6 | % |
12 |
NON-GAAP NET INCOME PERFORMANCE METRICS
% of Target | Achievement Level ($M) | Payout % | ||||
Less than 80% | Less than $37.64 Million | 0 | % | |||
80% | $37.64 Million | 50 | % | |||
85% | $39.99 Million | 62.5 | % | |||
90% | $42.34 Million | 75 | % | |||
95% | $44.70 Million | 87.5 | % | |||
100% | $47.05 Million | 100 | % | |||
105% | $49.40 Million | 125 | % | |||
110% | $51.75 Million | 150 | % | |||
115% | $54.11 Million | 175 | % | |||
120% | $56.46 Million | 200 | % | |||
ACTUAL ACHIEVEMENT | $70.40 Million | 200 | % |
(1) | The AIP provides for adjustment upon the occurrence of the following: To the extent consistent with the requirements for satisfying the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 162(m)”), the Compensation Committee may provide in the case of any award intended to qualify as a performance-based award for such exception that one or more of the performance criteria applicable to such award will be adjusted in an objectively determinable manner to reflect events occurring during the performance period that affect the applicable performance criterion or criteria. Such adjustments may include (without limitation) one or more of the following: (i) items related to a change in accounting principle; (ii) items relating to financing activities; (iii) expenses for restructuring or productivity initiatives; (iv) other non-operating items; (v) items related to acquisitions; (vi) items attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired by the Company during the performance period; (vii) items related to the disposal of a business or segment of a business; (viii) items related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as a segment of a business under United States generally accepted accounting principles; (ix) items attributable to any stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of shares occurring during the performance period; (x) any other items of significant income or expense which are determined to be appropriate adjustments; (xi) items relating to unusual, infrequently occurring, or extraordinary corporate transactions, events or developments; (xii) items related to amortization of acquired intangible assets; (xiii) items that are outside the scope of the Company’s core, on-going business activities; or (xiv) items relating to any other unusual or nonrecurring events or changes in applicable laws, accounting principles or business conditions. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee shall not make an adjustment to an award intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) in a manner that would cause the award not to so qualify. |
Under the AIP, the base salaries and target/maximum percentage payouts in effect for each of the named executive officers for 2017 were as follows:
Named Executive Officer | Base Salary | Target/Maximum | |||||
John N. Haugh | $ | 1,000,000 | 100%/200% | ||||
David K. Jones | $ | 620,000 | 65%/130% | ||||
Jason Schaefer | $ | 500,000 | 65%/130% |
On March 14, 2018, after taking into account the Company’s financial performance described above and each executive’s individual performance, the Compensation Committee confirmed the following specific 2017 AIP payments to named executive officers: Mr. Haugh received $826,688, Mr. Jones received $333,156 and Mr. Schaefer received $448,850. Mr. Cuneo was not eligible to earn bonuses under the AIP in 2017.
2017 Long Term Incentive Plan
In 2017, the Company granted performance-based equity awards and long-term equity awards to named executive officers and other key employees, which include PSUs that vest based on the Company’s achievement of adjusted operating income targets for the performance period (January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019). The specific performance-based equity awards made to named executive officers under the 2017 LTIP were as follows: on March 7, 2017, Mr. Haugh was granted 195,045 2017 PSUs, Mr. Jones was granted 53,194 2017 PSUs and Mr. Schaefer was granted 44,328 2017 PSUs. For a description of the terms of the 2017 PSUs, please see below “Outstanding PSU Grants - 2017 PSUs.”
The specific long-term equity awards made to named executive officers under the 2017 LTIP were as follows: On March 7, 2017, Mr. Haugh was granted 97,508 RSUs, Mr. Jones was granted 26,593 RSUs and Mr. Schaefer was granted 22,161 RSUs, one-third of which vest on each of March 30, 2018, 2019 and 2020. Of these RSUs and as a result of the NASDAQ stock market being closed for a holiday on March 30, 2018, 32,503 RSUs vested on March 29, 2018 for Mr. Haugh, 8,865 RSUs vested on March 29, 2018 for Mr. Jones and 7,387 RSUs vested on March 29, 2018 for Mr. Schaefer.
13 |
Outstanding PSU Grants
PSU Performance Comparator Group
For 2016, the Compensation Committee adopted the same peer group recommended by FW Cook for use in determining relative performance metrics for each tranche of PSUs granted in respect of 2016, and Relative EBITDA Growth and Relative EPS Growth under the final tranche of our historical 2015 PSUs, in order to ensure a consistent calculation of measures of performance. The peer group utilized for relative metric vesting (the “PSU Performance Comparator Group”) is as follows:
Cherokee Inc. | Perry Ellis Inc. |
Choice Hotels | Sequential Brands Inc. |
Deckers Outdoor Corporation | Sotheby’s |
Fossil Inc. | Steve Madden |
G-III Apparel Group Ltd. | Tumi Holdings Inc. |
Kate Spade & Co. | Vera Bradley, Inc. |
Meredith Corp. | Vince Holding |
Movado Group, Inc. | Wolverine World Wide, Inc. |
Oxford Industries, Inc. |
Excluded from this group for the computation of the relative performance calculations were certain companies that did not meet the criteria for each of the specific performance metrics or that no longer filed public information.
For the 2017 PSU’s, the PSU Performance Comparator Group was adjusted to remove Sotheby’s (no longer perceived as a strong talent competitor) and Tumi Holdings (which was acquired), and add Francesca’s Holdings (operates in the same talent market as Iconix).
2017 PSUs
The 2017 PSUs “cliff” vest on March 30, 2020, assuming the compounded operating income growth metrics for the three-year performance period (January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019), as adjusted pursuant to the 2016 Plan (as described under the 2017 AIP), are satisfied, and the executive has continued employment through March 30, 2020. The 2017 PSUs, in instances of retirement, involuntary termination not for cause, and voluntary termination with good reason, death and disability, payouts will be made at the end of the three-year performance period based on actual performance as certified by the Compensation Committee and pro-rated to reflect actual years completed by the executive. Following December 31, 2019, the Compensation Committee will determine how many of the 2017 PSUs were earned based on the compounded operating income growth metrics, as adjusted pursuant to the 2016 Plan for various contingencies, including acquisitions and dispositions throughout the performance period. Please see Exhibit 10.78 for detail regarding an unaudited reconciliation from GAAP to non-GAAP amounts for the non-GAAP operating income metric.
If the Company’s TSR percentile rank for the three-year performance period is in the bottom quartile of the applicable PSU Performance Comparator Group noted above, the maximum number of 2017 PSUs that shall vest shall be 100% of the Target PSUs.
2016 Retention PSUs
As previously announced in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 13, 2016, in 2016 the Company established a special one-time, performance-based retention plan (referred to herein as the “2016 retention plan”), consisting of cash and equity awards for employees, including all named executive officers other than Messrs. Haugh and Cuneo.
Under the 2016 retention plan, our named executive officers received the following equity grants: Mr. Jones received 155,000 PSUs and Mr. Schaefer received 120,000 PSUs. Such PSUs “cliff” vest in three years based on total shareholder return (“TSR”) as measured against the applicable PSU Performance Comparator Group listed above. The vesting schedule is as follows:
TSR of less than 35% | 0% vesting |
TSR between 35% and 50% | 25%-50% vesting (linear interpolation) |
TSR between 50% and 75% |
50%-100% vesting (linear interpolation) |
TSR at 75% or above | 100% vesting |
14 |
There will be interpolation on a straight-line basis (i.e. linearly interpolated) between 35% and 50% and between 50% and 75% achievement. These awards are also subject to the “double trigger” change of control provisions contained in the 2009 Plan.
For a summary of the cash awards made to named executive officers under the 2016 retention plan, please see “Summary Compensation Table” on page 20.
2016 LTIP PSUs and Mr. Haugh’s 2016 PSUs
Other than for Mr. Haugh, the 2016 LTIP PSUs “cliff” vest on March 30, 2019, assuming the compounded operating income growth metrics for the three-year performance period (January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018), as adjusted pursuant to the 2016 Plan (as described under the 2017 AIP), are satisfied, and the executive has continued employment through March 30, 2019. Please see Exhibit 10.78 for detail regarding an unaudited reconciliation from GAAP to non-GAAP amounts for the non-GAAP operating income metric. The 2016 LTIP PSUs, in instances of retirement, involuntary termination not for cause, and voluntary termination with good reason, death and disability, payouts will be made at the end of the three-year performance period based on actual performance as certified by the Compensation Committee and pro-rated to reflect actual years completed by the executive. Following December 31, 2018, the Compensation Committee will determine how many of the 2016 LTIP PSUs were earned based on the compounded operating income growth metrics, as adjusted pursuant to the 2016 Plan for various contingencies, including acquisitions and dispositions throughout the performance period. If the Company’s TSR percentile rank for the three-year performance period is in the bottom quartile of the PSU Performance Comparator Group listed above, the maximum number of 2016 LTIP PSUs that shall vest shall be 100% of the Target PSUs.
Mr. Haugh’s 2016 PSUs are governed by the terms of his employment agreement, pursuant to which up to one-third of Mr. Haugh’s 2016 PSUs will be converted into time-based awards on each of December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, based on actual performance as of the date of conversion as certified by the Compensation Committee, and such time-based awards will vest on December 31, 2018, subject to Mr. Haugh’s employment until such date (other than if, prior to December 31, 2018, Mr. Haugh is terminated by us without cause or by him for good reason, in which case any time-based awards into which Mr. Haugh’s 2016 PSUs shall have converted will vest and be settled on December 31, 2018, subject to Mr. Haugh’s compliance with the applicable terms of his employment agreement). With respect to the tranche of Mr. Haugh’s 2016 PSUs that were available to convert into time-based awards on December 31, 2017, on March 29, 2018, 131,233 2016 PSUs were converted into time-based awards based on achievement of over 7.5% compounded operating income growth in accordance with the following Compounded Operating Income Growth %, as adjusted by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the 2016 Plan:
Compounded Operating Income Growth % (Aggregate in $) |
Percentage of PSUs Earned | |
Up to 2.5% ($386,058 Million) | 0 | |
Above 2.5% ($386,058 Million) up to 4.0% ($394,609 Million) | An interpolated percentage above 0 and up to 50% | |
Above 4.0% ($394,609 Million) up to 5.0% ($400,356 Million) | An interpolated percentage above 50% and up to 100% | |
Above 5.0% ($400,356 Million) up to 6.0% ($406,141 Million) | An interpolated percentage between 100% and up to 150% | |
Above 6.0% ($406,141 Million) up to 7.5% ($414,888 Million) | An interpolated percentage between 150% and up to 200% | |
Above 7.5% ($414,888 Million) | 200% |
If the Company’s TSR percentile rank for any performance period is in the bottom quartile of the applicable PSU Performance Comparator Group listed above, the maximum number of Mr. Haugh’s 2016 PSUs that shall convert to RSUs with respect to such performance period shall be 100% of the Target PSUs.
2015 PSUs
As of December 31, 2017, the only tranche of PSUs issued prior to 2016 that were outstanding were the 2015 PSUs. Each tranche of 2015 PSUs had absolute performance metrics for EBITDA Growth, EPS Growth and Free Cash Flow, in differing percentages and different base years as described below. In addition, with respect to EBITDA Growth and EPS Growth, vesting could occur based on the Company’s relative achievement of such growth as compared to the applicable PSU Performance Comparator Group listed above.
15 |
Absolute Metrics—General—2015 PSUs
The metric requirements for each vesting period were set at the date of grant and each year a certain portion of the 2015 PSUs are available to vest, based on the Company’s achievement of such metrics. The EBITDA and EPS requirements for each year were set based on the EBITDA and EPS reported by the Company with compounded annual growth from the year in which the PSUs were granted, with a target rate of 10% compounded annual growth and threshold rate of 5% compounded annual growth. The Free Cash Flow metric was set at $125 million for each tranche of 2015 PSUs. Please see Exhibit 10.78 for detail regarding unaudited reconciliations from GAAP to non-GAAP amounts for these financial measures. During our stockholder outreach, we learned that some of our stockholders believed that the performance metrics of our historical PSUs were not difficult to achieve. We have noted below (see “Discussion of Historical PSUs”) where certain performance metrics were not met and such corresponding PSUs did not vest.
2015 PSUs vest 33 1/3% based on EBITDA Growth, 33 1/3% based on EPS Growth and 33 1/3% based on Free Cash Flow. With respect to unearned 2015 PSUs related to EBITDA Growth and EPS Growth, each are eligible for a “catch up,” as described below.
Relative Metrics—General—2015 PSUs
If the Absolute EBITDA Growth or Absolute EPS Growth metrics applicable to the 2015 PSUs are not fully met, additional vesting may be achieved if the Compensation Committee determines that the relative metrics would yield such vesting. The Relative EBITDA Growth and Relative EPS Growth performance metrics are determined by reference to what percentile the Actual EBITDA Growth and Actual EPS Growth achieved by the Company during the performance period places the Company as compared to the applicable PSU Performance Comparator Group listed above. The following vesting will occur based on relative metrics if higher than what would vest based on absolute metrics: If the Company places in the 50th percentile for a metric, 50% of the target PSUs eligible for vesting based on such metric will vest; if the Company places in the 90th percentile or higher for a metric, up to 100% of the PSUs eligible for vesting based on such metric will vest; and if the Company places below the 50th percentile for a metric, none of the PSUs eligible for vesting based on such metric will vest. However, if there is no positive EBITDA Growth or EPS Growth on an actual basis during the period, no more than 50% vesting for the relevant metric will occur.
The 2015 PSUs contained a catch-up feature for the EBITDA Growth and EPS Growth metrics. The catch-up feature provides that if, in any year, Absolute Growth within either the EBITDA Growth or EPS Growth metric does not result in vesting, because (i) the Absolute Growth required for maximum vesting was not achieved, or (ii) vesting was achieved based on Relative Growth, then, in later years, Absolute Growth will be measured cumulatively to include the Absolute Growth that did not result in vesting, in order to allow vesting of the earlier year’s unvested PSUs (i.e. those that did not vest based on Absolute Growth or Relative Growth) and then, if available, to those of a later year. If, in any year, Absolute Growth within a category exceeds the percentage required for maximum vesting in such category, the excess growth shall be carried back into earlier years (to allow vesting to the extent not previously achieved by virtue of Absolute Growth or Relative Growth) or forward into later years (so that cumulative Absolute Growth in the later year is measured from the point required to achieve maximum vesting in the earlier year). As noted above, this catch-up feature was eliminated in the 2016 and 2017 PSUs, and the Company intends to eliminate such feature in all future PSU awards.
Performance Metrics and Earned PSUs for 2015 PSUs
Mr. Jones received 2015 PSUs that are available to vest as described in the section below entitled “2015 PSUs Awarded.” None of Messrs. Haugh, Cuneo or Schaefer received any grants of 2015 PSUs. The Absolute Growth metrics for the 2015 PSUs are $125 million Free Cash Flow, and, with respect to EBITDA and EPS, the Absolute Growth metrics for the year ended December 31, 2017 are set forth below.
2015 PSU Absolute Metrics
Performance Metric | Requirement | |
Target Absolute EBITDA Growth | EBITDA of $280,939 million | |
Threshold Absolute EBITDA Growth | EBITDA of $244,344 million | |
Target Absolute EPS Growth | EPS of $1.97 | |
Threshold Absolute EPS Growth | EPS of $1.71 |
The relative metrics applicable to the 2015 PSUs were calculated in the manner described above under “Relative Metrics”. For 2017, none of the 2015 PSUs vested with respect to either the Absolute or Relative EBITDA metrics, or the Absolute or Relative EPS metrics. As noted below, only those 2015 PSUs eligible to vest based on 2017 performance under the Free Cash Flow metric actually vested.
16 |
2015 PSUs Awarded
Under the terms of his former employment agreement, Mr. Jones was awarded 34,217 2015 PSUs that are subject to performance vesting as described above under 2015 PSUs. As noted above, none of Messrs. Haugh, Cuneo or Schaefer received any grants of 2015 PSUs.
Mr. Jones’s 2015 PSUs vested as to (i) 6,842 2015 PSUs on December 31, 2015 and (ii) 4,562 2015 PSUs on December 31, 2016. For 2017, up to 13,687 2015 PSUs were available to vest and 4,562 2015 PSUs vested based on achievement of the Free Cash Flow performance metric set forth above.
Other Equity-based Compensation
Make Whole Inducement Award—Haugh
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Haugh was granted 246,326 RSUs as part of a make-whole inducement award, which award had a total aggregate value of $3,800,000 on the date of grant and consisted of a $1,923,000 cash payment and RSUs with an aggregate fair market value of $1,877,000 on the date of grant (246,326 RSUs). Of these RSUs (i) 82,109 vested on February 22, 2017, (ii) 82,108 vested on February 22, 2018 and (iii) the remaining RSUs vest as to 82,109 on February 22, 2019, assuming Mr. Haugh is still an employee of the Company on such date.
Employment Inducement Award—Haugh
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Haugh was granted an employment inducement award of PSUs with a fair market value on February 23, 2016 of $1,500,000 (196,850 PSUs). These PSUs will “cliff” vest at the end of a three-year performance period ending on February 22, 2019, based on achievement of relative total shareholder return over the performance period. Generally, Mr. Haugh must be employed during the entire performance period to receive these PSUs.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Company has adopted stock ownership guidelines which are considered best practices and require our executives and directors to own shares of the Company’s stock. Stock ownership guidelines have been set at the following levels:
Chief Executive Officer: | 6X annual base salary |
Other Named Executive Officers and All Direct Reports to the CEO: | 3X annual base salary |
Directors: | 5X annual cash retainer |
Unvested RSUs, net of taxes at a 40% rate, count towards stock ownership targets. Unvested PSUs and unexercised stock options do not count towards stock ownership targets. Pledged shares do not count towards stock ownership guidelines.
There is no required timeframe in which executives and directors must attain the stock ownership targets. However, until the stock ownership target is achieved, a stock retention ratio applies as follows:
Chief Executive Officer: | 100% of net profit shares |
Other Named Executive Officers and All Direct Report to the CEO: | 50% of net profit shares |
Directors: | 100% of net profit shares |
For this purpose, “net profit shares” means shares received on vesting or earn out of restricted stock, RSUs and PSUs, net of shares used to pay withholding taxes and shares received on the exercise of stock options, net of shares tendered or withheld for payment of exercise price and withholding taxes.
Anti-Pledging Policy
We have adopted an anti-pledging policy under which directors and executive officers are prohibited from pledging shares.
17 |
We recognized that as of October 20, 2015 (the date of adoption of the anti-pledging policy), 300,668 shares held by directors and executive officers were subject to outstanding pledges. As of April 30, 2017, the number of shares subject to outstanding pledges has declined to zero. No future pledges are permitted.
Tax Deductibility and Accounting Ramifications
The Compensation Committee generally takes into account the various tax and accounting ramifications of compensation awarded to our executives. When determining amounts of equity-based grants to executives, the Compensation Committee also considers the accounting expense associated with the grants.
For 2017 and prior years, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”) generally disallowed a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation in excess of $1 million paid for any fiscal year to a company’s Chief Executive Officer or to any of the company’s other three most highly compensated executive officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer). The statute generally exempted qualifying performance-based compensation from the deduction limit if certain conditions were met. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, eliminated the “performance-based” compensation exemption under Section 162(m) and revised the definition of “covered employee.” Therefore, for 2018 and subsequent years, compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and to each of our other named executive officers will not be deductible for federal income tax purposes to the extent such compensation exceeds $1 million, regardless of whether such compensation would have qualified for the “performance-based” compensation exemption under prior law. In addition, any individual who is a “covered employee” (as defined in Section 162(m)) in 2017 or becomes a covered employee thereafter will remain subject to the $1 million tax deductibility limit regardless of loss of status as a named executive officer or termination of employment.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act includes a transition rule under which the changes to Section 162(m) described above will not apply to compensation payable pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 and is not materially modified after that date. The Compensation Committee will consider the potential applicability of such transition relief with respect to the Company’s executive compensation program, as additional guidance may be issued by the Internal Revenue Service in the future, to determine whether satisfying such transition relief is consistent with the goals of the Company’s executive compensation program. However, the Compensation Committee may exercise its discretion to award or pay compensation that may not qualify for any transition relief under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act when it considers it appropriate to do so.
We review the tax impact of our executive compensation on the Company as well as on the executive officers. In addition, we review the impact of our programs against other considerations, such as accounting impact, stockholder alignment, market competitiveness, effectiveness and perceived value to employees. Because many different factors influence a well-rounded, comprehensive executive compensation program, some compensation might not, on some occasions, be deductible by the Company under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Compensation Policies and Practices as Related to Risk Management
The Compensation Committee is responsible for assessing the risks associated with the Company’s compensation practices, policies and programs. This assessment is performed to determine if such risks arising from such practices are appropriate or if they are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Committee performed this assessment and believes that, for 2017, the compensation policies did not incentivize our employees to take unnecessary risks.
Clawback
Per the terms of its clawback policy and in connection with the Company’s recent financial restatements, in 2016 we recouped, or “clawed back,” certain performance-based compensation previously paid in respect of restated periods to our former Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Strategy Officer. The aggregate amount of recouped compensation was $2,175,000 in cash and 594,877 shares of our common stock.
Summary
We believe that the Compensation Committee has made marked progress on restructuring our executive compensation policies to ensure that they are competitive, consistent with market practices and accurately carry out the goals of our overall compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee’s continued commitment to reviewing our governance and compensation practices and making such additional changes as are necessary will help us to ensure that our compensation program continues to be competitively designed and optimizes talent recruitment and retention, which are critical to our business and incentivize our executives to achieve key operational and strategic priorities that support our short- and long-term strategic objectives and create long-term stockholder value. Additionally, we will continue to ensure that our compensation program is flexible so that we can be responsive to feedback from our investors.
18 |
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for 2017 appearing in this Report. Based on such reviews and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Report for filing with the SEC.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Mark Friedman, Chairman
Sue Gove
Sanjay Khosla
Kenneth Slutsky
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Other than as set forth in the immediately following sentence, none of the directors on our Compensation Committee currently is or was formerly an officer or employee of the Company or had any relationship or related party transaction requiring disclosure under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. As noted in the Original Filing, in 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred $100,000 per year (pro-rated for 2016 based on date of termination of such consulting arrangement) in consulting fees in connection with a consulting arrangement with Mark Friedman, our Compensation Committee chairman, relating to the provision by Mr. Friedman of investor relations services. Such consulting arrangement was terminated on May 3, 2016. During 2017, none of our executive officers served on the board of directors or the compensation (or equivalent) committee of any other entity that has officers that serve on our Board or on our Compensation Committee. In addition, none of the members of our Compensation Committee were formerly, or during 2017, employed by us in the capacity as an officer or otherwise.
The members of our Compensation Committee currently are Messrs. Friedman, Khosla and Slutsky and Ms. Gove, each of whom is an independent director as such within the meaning of director independence standards applicable to members of such committees pursuant to the applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules. Mr. Friedman currently serves as its chairman.
19 |
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table includes information for 2017, 2016 and 2015 with respect to our named executive officers.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) (a) | Bonus ($) (b) | Stock Awards ($) (c) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (d) | All Other Compensation ($) (e) | Total ($) (f) | |||||||||||||||||||
John N. Haugh(1) | 2017 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | — | $ | 2,200,000 | $ | 826,688 | $ | 32,303 | $ | 4,058,991 | |||||||||||||
President and Chief | 2016 | $ | 854,167 | $ | 1,923,000 | $ | 5,008,888 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 274,055 | $ | 9,060,110 | |||||||||||||
Executive Officer | 2015 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||
F. Peter Cuneo(2) | 2017 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||
Executive Chairman; | 2016 | $ | 944,375 | $ | — | $ | 421,200 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,365,575 | |||||||||||||
Former Chairman and Former Interim Chief Executive Officer | 2015 | $ | 1,354,375 | $ | — | $ | 1,176,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,530,375 | |||||||||||||
David K. Jones(3) | 2017 | $ | 620,000 | $ | — | $ | 600,000 | $ | 333,156 | $ | 22,253 | $ | 1,575,409 | |||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and | 2016 | $ | 617,750 | $ | 425,000 | $ | 1,464,750 | $ | 523,125 | $ | 18,000 | $ | 3,048,625 | |||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2015 | $ | 280,966 | $ | 150,000 | $ | 1,766,966 | $ | — | $ | 9,000 | $ | 2,206,932 | |||||||||||||
Jason Schaefer | 2017 | $ | 500,000 | $ | — | $ | 500,000 | $ | 448,850 | $ | 18,540 | $ | 1,467,390 | |||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and | 2016 | $ | 497,000 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 1,160,001 | $ | 484,375 | $ | 18,000 | $ | 2,359,376 | |||||||||||||
General Counsel | 2015 | $ | 433,333 | $ | 275,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 18,000 | $ | 726,333 |
(a) | Salary includes, as applicable, base salary and pro-rated salaries for changes made to base salary during the year, as defined in the employment agreements or Executive Severance Plan participation agreements, as applicable. |
(b) | Bonuses are fixed incentive and/or percentage incentive, as provided for, in the case of Messrs. Jones and Schaefer, in the applicable Executive Severance Plan participation agreements or, in the case of Mr. Haugh, in his employment agreement. No annual cash bonus awards were made by the Company in respect of 2015. Cash bonus awards paid in 2015 were in respect of 2014 performance. The Company provided a retention bonus in respect of 2016, which was paid in four quarterly installments in 2016, provided each recipient was employed by the Company on the respective payment date. While Mr. Haugh did not participate in the 2016 retention program, pursuant to his Employment Agreement, in 2016 he received the Make-Whole Inducement Award, which included cash in an amount equal to $1,923,000. |
(c) | The amounts shown in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value in 2017, 2016 and 2015 with respect to PSUs and RSUs. See Note 5 to Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion for the relevant assumptions used in calculating grant date fair value. Mr. Haugh’s 2016 stock awards included a make-whole RSU award with a grants date fair value of $1,877,000 and PSU employment inducement award with a grant date fair value of $1,131,888. Mr. Cuneo received an equity grant valued at $120,000 in respect of annual director compensation in January 2017 prior to serving as our Executive Chairman in December 2017, which is reported in the Director Compensation Table. Mr. Cuneo will not be compensated in his role as a director during his service as Executive Chairman. |
(d) | Non-equity incentive plan compensation represents the dollar value of all amounts earned during the applicable fiscal year pursuant to non-equity incentive plans. Beginning in 2016, following its previously disclosed commitment to do so, the Compensation Committee eliminated the practice of granting bonuses on a solely discretionary basis and granted performance-based cash bonus awards. |
(e) | All other compensation represents relocation expenses and insurance costs for Mr. Haugh and a car allowance and insurance costs for each of Mr. Jones and Mr. Schaefer. Mr. Cuneo received cash compensation in an amount equal to $80,000 in respect of annual director fees prior to serving as our Executive Chairman in December 2017, which is reported in the Director Compensation Table. Mr. Cuneo will not be compensated in his role as a director during his service as Executive Chairman. |
(f) | Total compensation represents all compensation from us earned by the named executive officer for the year. |
(1) | Mr. Haugh was appointed to our Board and became our President on February 23, 2016, and also became our Chief Executive Officer on April 1, 2016. |
(2) | Mr. Cuneo served as our Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer from August 2015 until April 2016. Mr. Cuneo served as Executive Chairman of the Board from April 2016 to December 2016. Mr. Cuneo commenced again his service as our Executive Chairman of the Board on December 18, 2017. Mr. Cuneo did not earn any compensation in 2017 for his service as Executive Chairman of the Board, and therefore, all of his 2017 compensation is reported in the Director Compensation Table. |
(3) | Mr. Jones joined the Company in July 2015. |
20 |
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Awards: Number | Closing Price of Common Stock Units on Date of | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date(1) | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | or Units (#) | Grant ($) | Option Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John N. Haugh | 3/7/2017 | — | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 2,000,000 | — | 195,045 | 390,090 | 97,508 | $ | 7.52 | $ | 2,200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. Peter Cuneo(2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David K. Jones | 3/7/2017 | — | $ | 403,000 | $ | 806,000 | — | 53,194 | 106,388 | 26,593 | $ | 7.52 | $ | 600,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jason Schaefer | 3/7/2017 | — | $ | 325,000 | $ | 650,000 | — | 44,328 | 88,656 | 22,161 | $ | 7.52 | $ | 500,000 |
(1) | Grants were made pursuant to the 2016 Plan and were approved by the Compensation Committee on the grant date. |
(2) | Mr. Cuneo received an equity grant valued at $120,000 in respect of annual director compensation in January 2017 prior to serving as our Executive Chairman in December 2017, which is reported in the Director Compensation Table. Mr. Cuneo will not be compensated in his role as a director during his service as Executive Chairman. |
NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE TO SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE AND GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE
Employment Agreements and Executive Severance Plan Participation Agreements
The Compensation Committee determines the compensation for each of the named executive officers. As discussed above, in 2016, the Compensation Committee adopted the Executive Severance Plan, pursuant to which employees that report to the Chief Executive Officer and hold the title of executive vice president or the equivalent, are eligible to receive certain severance benefits provided they execute a participation agreement in the form contemplated by the Executive Severance Plan. All eligible participants, including Messrs. Jones and Schaefer, entered into participation agreements as of January 2017. These participation agreements supersede and replace the former employment agreements of the applicable named executive officers. The Executive Severance Plan is not applicable to Mr. Haugh, whose employment agreement remains in effect, and Mr. Cuneo, who entered into a new employment agreement with us in December 2017. The summaries below relate to, as applicable, employment agreements and Executive Severance Plan participation agreements of our named executive officers.
Adoption of Executive Severance Plan
On December 30, 2016, the Compensation Committee adopted an Executive Severance Plan pursuant to which eligible employees of the Company may receive certain severance benefits in the event of a “Qualifying Termination”. The Executive Severance Plan has been adopted to replace individual employment agreements for our executives (other than our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Cuneo). We believe this puts all of our executives on equal footing and incentivizes them all to work towards our established goals. The following is a summary of the material terms of the Executive Severance Plan. The summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Executive Severance Plan, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.65 to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Under the terms of the Executive Severance Plan, eligible employees are those who hold the title of Executive Vice-President or an equivalent officer title, report directly to our Chief Executive Officer, and execute a participation agreement in the form contemplated by the Executive Severance Plan. For purposes of the Executive Severance Plan, a Qualifying Termination generally means: (i) an involuntary termination by the Company of a participant’s employment without cause; or (ii) a participant’s resignation from employment with the Company for good reason. A Qualifying Termination does not include a termination of a participant’s employment which is (A) for cause, (B) as a result of a participant’s death or disability, or (C) as a result of a participant’s resignation other than for good reason.
Severance benefits include: (i) accrued obligations (if any) that remain unpaid as of the termination date, including earned but unpaid annual cash bonus (if any) for the immediately preceding fiscal year; (ii) in the case of a participant who has a Qualifying Termination, continuation of annual base salary for 18 months, paid in normal payroll installments, or in the case of a participant who has a Qualifying Termination during a “Change in Control Protection Period,” as defined in the Executive Severance Plan, an amount equal to two times the sum of the participant’s annual base salary and target annual bonus, paid in a lump sum; (iii) prorated annual cash bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance; and (iv) if participant elects COBRA health benefit continuation coverage, payment as additional taxable severance of an amount equal to the dollar amount of premium cost for similarly situated active executives (payment ceases once participant ceases to be eligible for COBRA coverage or becomes eligible for coverage from a new employer). The Change in Control Protection Period refers to the period commencing on the date a Change in Control, as defined in the Executive Severance Plan, is consummated and ending 24 months following the date of such consummation.
21 |
As a condition of receiving any severance benefits under the Executive Severance Plan, a participant is required to execute and not revoke a release agreement and comply with the noncompetition and other restrictive covenants set forth in the Executive Severance Plan. In the event a participant has a Qualifying Termination during a Change in Control Protection Period, the participant will not be subject to the noncompetition restriction after the date of the Qualifying Termination, but will remain subject to all other restrictive covenants.
John N. Haugh
2016 Employment Agreement
On February 18, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. John N. Haugh that provides for the employment of Mr. Haugh as our President as of February 23, 2016 (the “Commencement Date”) and as our President and Chief Executive Officer commencing April 1, 2016 and continuing until February 23, 2019 (the “Term”).
Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Haugh is entitled to an annual base salary of not less than $1,000,000.
Under the employment agreement, Mr. Haugh is entitled to participate in our executive bonus program and is eligible to receive annual target bonuses of up to 100% of his base salary, with increases of up to a maximum of 200% of his base salary. Mr. Haugh is also entitled to various benefits, including benefits available to our other senior executives and certain expenses for his relocation to the New York metropolitan area, up to a maximum of $300,000.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Haugh was granted a one-time award of PSUs equal to a number of shares of common stock with a fair market value on the date of the grant of $1,500,000 (196,850 PSUs), which are scheduled to “cliff” vest on December 31, 2018, based on performance criteria consistent with those contained in agreements relating to annual performance-based awards issued to our other executives in 2016. Mr. Haugh also was granted RSUs of an aggregate fair market value of $500,000 as of the date of grant (62,112 RSUs), which vest in three equal annual installments, two of which vested on February 22, 2017 and 2018, and the remaining one of which will vest on February 22, 2019, subject to Mr. Haugh’s continuous employment with us on the applicable vesting date. We will consider granting PSUs and RSUs or other cash or equity-based long-term incentives in future years, taking into account market levels, Mr. Haugh’s performance and other factors, considering $2,000,000 as the annual guideline for the aggregate fair market value of such awards, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee.
In addition, pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Haugh was granted a make-whole inducement award (the “Make-Whole Inducement Award”) with an aggregate value of $3,800,000, payable (i) $1,923,000 in cash, as soon as practicable after the Commencement Date, subject to Mr. Haugh having been required to return such payment to us upon termination of his employment without “good reason” during the first 12 months after the Commencement Date, under certain circumstances, and (ii) by the grant, on the Commencement Date, of time-vested restricted common stock units (“Make-Whole RSUs”) with an aggregate fair market value of $1,877,000 as of the date of grant (246,325 Make-Whole RSUs). The Make-Whole RSUs vest in three equal annual installments, one of which vested on February 22, 2017, one of which vested on February 22, 2018. The final tranche of Make-Whole RSUs will vest on February 22, 2019, subject to Mr. Haugh’s continuous employment with us on the vesting date.
In addition, pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Haugh was granted PSUs equal to a number of shares of common stock with a fair market value on the Commencement Date of $1,500,000 (the “Employment Inducement PSUs”) (196,850 Employment Inducement PSUs) which will “cliff” vest at the end of a three year performance period ending on February 22, 2019 (the “Performance Period”) based on achievement of relative total shareholder return over the Performance Period measured against the comparator group selected by the Compensation Committee. Generally, to receive these PSUs, Mr. Haugh must be employed during the entire Performance Period.
If Mr. Haugh’s employment is terminated by us for “cause” or by him without “good reason” (each as defined in the employment agreement), he would receive his (a) earned and unpaid base salary through the date of termination, (b) reimbursement for any unreimbursed expenses properly incurred and paid through the date of termination, (c) payment for any accrued but unused vacation time in accordance with our policies, (d) such vested accrued benefits, and other payments, if any, to which Mr. Haugh (and his eligible dependents) may be entitled under and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the employee benefits arrangements, plans and programs of the Company, other than any severance pay plan ((a) through (d), the “Amounts and Benefits”) and (e) all vested shares in respect of Mr. Haugh’s equity awards.
22 |
If Mr. Haugh’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by him for “good reason”, he will receive the Amounts and Benefits and (a) an amount equal to two times the applicable base salary, which amount shall be payable in equal installments during the Non-Compete Term (as defined in the employment agreement); (b) any annual bonus earned but unpaid for the prior year (the “Prior Year Bonus”); (c) a pro rata portion of Mr. Haugh’s annual bonus for the fiscal year in which his termination occurs based on actual results for such year, payable at such time as bonuses for the year are paid to our executives generally (the “Pro Rata Bonus”); (d) subject to Mr. Haugh’s timely election of continuation coverage under COBRA with respect to our group health insurance plans in which Mr. Haugh participated immediately prior to the date of termination (“COBRA Continuation Coverage”) and continued payment by Mr. Haugh of premiums for such plans at the “active employee” rate, we shall provide COBRA Continuation Coverage for up to 18 months following such termination (the “Medical Continuation Benefits”); and (e) any unvested amounts subject to equity awards granted under the employment agreement are to vest to the extent provided in the applicable equity award agreement.
If Mr. Haugh’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” or for “good reason” within 12 months after a “change in control” (as defined in the employment agreement), he would receive in a lump sum, in cash, within 15 days after termination, an amount equal to two times the sum of (a) the applicable base salary and (b) the average annual bonus award to Mr. Haugh for the two fiscal years prior to such “change in control.” In addition, Mr. Haugh will receive (x) payments in the amounts contemplated, and on the dates specified in relation to the Prior Year Bonus and Medical Continuation Benefits and immediate vesting and distribution of (y) unvested RSU’s issued pursuant to the Make-Whole Inducement Award and the converted Employment Inducement PSUs. Upon death, the employment agreement provides we will pay to Mr. Haugh or his estate, (a) the Amounts and Benefits; (b) the Prior Year Bonus; and (c) the Pro Rata Bonus. If terminated for disability, the employment agreement provides we will pay to Mr. Haugh, the same benefits as granted upon death but including, the Medical Continuation Benefits. Upon death or disability, (a) 100% of the then remaining unvested Make-Whole Inducement Awards will immediately vest and will be distributed within 30 days of such termination and (b) unvested shares subject to other equity awards granted will vest if and to the extent provided for in the applicable equity award agreement.
The employment agreement with Mr. Haugh also contains confidentiality, non-disparagement and cooperation provisions for an indefinite period, and non-competition and non-solicitation provisions during employment and for 24 months thereafter.
F. Peter Cuneo
2017 Employment Agreement
Since December 18, 2017, Mr. Cuneo has served as our Executive Chairman pursuant to the terms of an employment agreement we entered into with him on December 18, 2017. The material terms of the 2017 employment agreement provide that commencing January 1, 2018, Mr. Cuneo will receive a yearly salary equal to $490,000, $80,000 of which was paid on January 1, 2018, with the remainder of such salary (in an amount equal to $410,000 ($34,167 per month)), to be paid in accordance with the Company’s payroll practices and policies then in effect and prorated for any partial period. The 2017 employment agreement does not provide for equity grants to Mr. Cuneo.
Either the Company or Mr. Cuneo may terminate his employment as Executive Chairman for any reason or for no reason; provided that Mr. Cuneo shall provide 30 days’ notice prior to any such termination.
The 2017 employment agreement also contains confidentiality provisions for an indefinite period.
David K. Jones
2017 Executive Severance Plan Participation Agreement
On January 24, 2017, Mr. Jones entered into a participation agreement to the Executive Severance Plan, which was effective as of January 15, 2017 and supersedes and replaces his former employment agreement (except as noted herein). Pursuant to the terms of the participation agreement, Mr. Jones is subject to the terms of the Executive Severance Plan generally applicable to all participants. The participation agreement provides for Mr. Jones to be employed as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In addition, the participation agreement entitles him to an annual base salary of $620,000 (subject to annual performance review), a target annual cash bonus opportunity equal to 65% of his annual base salary (which actual cash bonus payment may be above or below such target based on actual performance as determined by the Compensation Committee), a guaranteed minimum cash bonus of $250,000 for the 2017 calendar year (consistent with the terms of his former employment agreement) and certain automobile benefits. Mr. Jones’s participation agreement also provides that the terms governing the RSUs and PSUs granted to Mr. Jones in connection with his former employment agreement, shall remain in force until such grants vest or are otherwise forfeited, and that any “change in control” which relates to such RSUs and PSUs shall refer to the definition of “change in control” provided in his former employment agreement.
23 |
Jason Schaefer
2017 Executive Severance Plan Participation Agreement
On December 30, 2016, Mr. Schaefer entered into a participation agreement to the Executive Severance Plan, which was effective as of January 1, 2017 and supersedes and replaces his former employment agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the participation agreement, Mr. Schaefer is subject to the terms of the Executive Severance Plan generally applicable to all participants, as described above. The participation agreement provides for Mr. Schaefer to be employed as our Executive Vice President and General Counsel. In addition, the participation agreement entitles him to an annual base salary of $500,000 (subject to annual performance review), a target annual cash bonus opportunity equal to 65% of his annual base salary (which actual cash bonus payment may be above or below such target based on actual performance as determined by the Compensation Committee), and certain automobile benefits.
24 |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
The following table sets forth information with respect to outstanding equity-based awards at December 31, 2017 for our named executive officers.
Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Vesting Date of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Equity Awards: Number of | Equity Plan Awards: Market or | ||||||||||||||||
Name | (#) | ($) | (#) | ($) | ||||||||||||||||
John N. Haugh | — | — | — | 196,850 | 253,937 | |||||||||||||||
— | — | — | 65,616 | 84,645 | ||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | 195,045 | 251,608 | ||||||||||||||||
82,108 | 2/22/2018 | 105,919 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
82,109 | 2/22/2019 | 105,921 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
20,704 | 2/22/2018 | 26,708 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
20,704 | 2/22/2019 | 26,708 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
49,824 | 12/31/2018 | 64,273 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
32,503 | 3/30/2018 | 41,929 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
32,503 | 3/30/2019 | 41,929 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
32,503 | 3/30/2020 | 41,929 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
131,233 | 12/31/2018 | 169,291 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
F. Peter Cuneo | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
David K. Jones | — | — | — | 155,000 | 199,950 | |||||||||||||||
— | — | — | 67,083 | 86,537 | ||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | 53,194 | 68,620 | ||||||||||||||||
11,014 | 3/30/2018 | 14,208 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
11,014 | 3/30/2019 | 14,208 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
8,865 | 3/30/2018 | 11,436 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
8,864 | 3/30/2019 | 11,435 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
8,864 | 3/30/2020 | 11,435 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Jason Schaefer | — | — | — | 120,000 | 154,800 | |||||||||||||||
— | — | — | 54,099 | 69,788 | ||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | 44,328 | 57,183 | ||||||||||||||||
8,882 | 3/30/2018 | 11,458 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
8,882 | 3/30/2019 | 11,458 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
7,387 | 3/30/2018 | 9,529 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
7,387 | 3/30/2019 | 9,529 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
7,387 | 3/30/2020 | 9,529 | — | — |
25 |
Grant dates and vesting dates for all outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2017 are as follows:
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unvested Restricted Stock(1) (#) | Grant Date | Vesting Date | |||||||||
John N. Haugh | 82,108 | 2/23/2016 | 2/22/2018 | |||||||||
82,109 | 2/23/2016 | 2/22/2019 | ||||||||||
20,704 | 3/31/2016 | 2/22/2018 | ||||||||||
20,704 | 3/31/2016 | 2/22/2019 | ||||||||||
196,850 | 2/23/2016 | 2/22/2019 | ||||||||||
196,849 | (2) | 2/23/2016 | 12/31/2018 | |||||||||
49,824 | (3) | 2/22/2017 | 12/31/2018 | |||||||||
32,503 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2018 | ||||||||||
32,503 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2019 | ||||||||||
32,503 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2020 | ||||||||||
195,045 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2020 | ||||||||||
F. Peter Cuneo | — | — | — | |||||||||
David K. Jones | 155,000 | 1/7/2016 | 12/31/2018 | |||||||||
67,083 | 3/31/2016 | 3/30/2019 | ||||||||||
11,014 | 3/31/2016 | 3/30/2018 | ||||||||||
11,014 | 3/31/2016 | 3/30/2019 | ||||||||||
53,194 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2020 | ||||||||||
8,865 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2018 | ||||||||||
8.864 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2019 | ||||||||||
8,864 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2020 | ||||||||||
Jason Schaefer | 120,000 | 1/7/2016 | 12/31/2018 | |||||||||
54,099 | 3/31/2016 | 3/30/2019 | ||||||||||
8,882 | 3/31/2016 | 3/30/2018 | ||||||||||
8,882 | 3/31/2016 | 3/30/2019 | ||||||||||
44,328 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2020 | ||||||||||
7,387 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2018 | ||||||||||
7,387 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2019 | ||||||||||
7,387 | 3/7/2017 | 3/30/2020 |
(1) | Includes both RSUs and PSUs. |
(2) | On March 29, 2018, 131,233 of such PSUs were converted to RSUs. Such RSUs vest on December 31, 2018, subject to Mr. Haugh’s continuous employment as of such date (other than if, prior to December 31, 2018, Mr. Haugh is terminated by us without cause or by him with good reason, in which case such RSUs will vest and be settled on December 31, 2018, subject to Mr. Haugh’s compliance with the applicable terms of his employment agreement). |
(3) | Reflects RSUs that were converted from PSUs pursuant to terms of Grant Agreement. Such RSUs vest on December 31, 2018, subject to Mr. Haugh’s continuous employment as of such date (other than if, prior to December 31, 2018, Mr. Haugh is terminated by us without cause or by him with good reason, in which case such RSUs will vest and be settled on December 31, 2018, subject to Mr. Haugh’s compliance with the applicable terms of his employment agreement). |
26 |
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The following table sets forth certain information regarding vesting of restricted stock held by our named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2017. No options have been issued to our named executive officers.
Stock Awards | ||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | ||||||
John N. Haugh (1) | 82,109 | $ | 753,761 | |||||
20,704 | $ | 190,063 | ||||||
F. Peter Cuneo(2) | - | $ | - | |||||
David K. Jones(3) | 13,687 | $ | 17,656 | |||||
11,013 | $ | 82,818 | ||||||
Jason Schaefer(4) | 8,882 | $ | 66,793 |
(1) | Represents 82,109 shares of common stock underlying Make-Whole RSUs that vested on February 22, 2017 and 20,704 shares of common stock underlying 2016 RSUs that vested on February 22, 2017. |
(2) | Mr. Cuneo received an equity grant of 12,097 shares of restricted stock in respect of annual director compensation in January 2017 prior to serving as our Executive Chairman in December 2017, which vested in July 2017 and is reported in the Director Compensation Table. Mr. Cuneo will not be compensated in his role as a director during his service as Executive Chairman. |
(3) | Represents 13,687 shares of common stock underlying 2015 RSUs that vested on December 31, 2017 and 11,013 shares of common stock underlying 2016 RSUs that vested on March 30, 2017. |
(4) | Represents 8,882 shares of common stock underlying 2016 RSUs that vested on March 30, 2017. |
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
As noted under “—Narrative to Summary Compensation Table-and Plan-Based Awards Table”, we had previously entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. As described above, as of January 2017, each of these employment agreements, other than our employment agreement with Mr. Haugh (which remains in effect) and our employment agreement with Mr. Cuneo, has been superseded and replaced by the Executive Severance Plan and related participation agreements thereto, which were entered into by our named executives, other than Mr. Haugh and Mr. Cuneo. Mr. Haugh’s employment agreement and Messrs. Jones and Schaefer’s respective participation agreements to the Executive Severance Plan provide for certain payments and other benefits if a named executive officer’s employment with us is terminated under circumstances specified in his or her respective agreement, including in connection with a “change in control” of the Company. A named executive officer’s rights upon the termination of his or her employment will depend upon the circumstances of the termination.
The receipt of the payments and benefits to the named executive officers under their employment agreements or participation agreements pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan are generally conditioned upon their complying with customary non-solicitation, non-competition, confidentiality, non-interference or non-disparagement provisions. By the terms of such agreements, the executives acknowledge that a breach of some or all of the covenants described herein will entitle us to injunctive relief restraining the commission or continuance of any such breach, in addition to any other available remedies. Except as provided in the footnotes below, the following table provides the term of such covenants following the termination of employment as it relates to each named executive officer:
Covenant | John N. Haugh | F. Peter Cuneo | David K. Jones | Jason Schaefer | ||||
Confidentiality | Infinite duration | Infinite duration | Infinite duration | Infinite duration | ||||
Non-solicitation | (1) | None | 18 months (2) | 18 months (2) | ||||
Non-competition | (1) | None | 18 months (2) | 18 months (2) | ||||
Non-interference | (1) | None | 18 months (2) | 18 months (2) | ||||
Non-disparagement | Infinite duration | None | Infinite duration | Infinite duration |
(1) | Covenant runs from February 18, 2016 (the date of Mr. Haugh’s employment agreement with the Company) until 24 months after the date of Mr. Haugh’s termination. |
27 |
(2) | Covenant runs for 18 months after the date of termination for any reason; provided that the non-competition restriction ends on the date of a termination by the Company without “cause” or the named executive officer for “good reason,” in either case, during the 24 months following a “change in control” (as such terms are defined in the Executive Severance Plan). |
Termination Payments (Without a Change in Control)
The table below includes a description and the amount of estimated payments and benefits, if any, that would be provided by us (or our successor) to each of the named executive officers under their respective employment agreement or Executive Severance Plan participation agreements, as applicable, assuming that a termination circumstance occurred as of December 31, 2017 and a “change in control” had not occurred:
Type of Payment (1) | Termination Event | John N. Haugh | F. Peter Cuneo | David K. Jones | Jason Schaefer | |||||||||||
Severance Payments | Termination without Cause or by executive for Good Reason | $ | 2,000,000 | (2) | None | $ | 930,000 | (7) | 750,000 | (7) | ||||||
Pro rata portion of current year bonuses | Death, disability, termination without Cause, or termination by executive for Good Reason | $ | 826,688 | (3) | None | $ | 333,156 | (3) | $ | 448,850 | (3) | |||||
Continued coverage under medical, dental, hospitalization | Disability, termination without Cause, or termination by executive for Good Reason | $23,595 | (4) | None | $ | 42,691 | (4) | $ | 42,691 | (4) | ||||||
Equity Acceleration | Death or Disability | $ | 531,342 | (5) | None | $ | 143,285 | (8) | $ | 117,089 | (10) | |||||
Termination without Cause, or termination by executive for Good Reason | $ | 551,529 | (6) | None | $ | 80,564 | (9) | $ | 65,586 | (11) | ||||||
Total Termination Benefits | Death or Disability | $ | 1,381,625 | None | $ | 517,132 | $ | 608,630 | ||||||||
Termination without Cause, or termination by executive for Good Reason | $ | 3,401,812 | None | $ | 1,384,411 | $ | 1,307,127 |
(1) | Each named executive officer would also be entitled to receive the following upon a cessation of employment: (a) earned but unpaid base salary, (b) unreimbursed business expenses, (c) accrued but unused vacation time and, (d) except for Mr. Cuneo, other than in the event of a termination by us for cause or a resignation by the executive without good reason, earned but unpaid bonuses for any year that precedes the year of termination. However, it is assumed for purposes of this table that each of the named executive officers have received all such amounts (or, in the case of vacation, have used all available time) as of December 31, 2017. |
(2) | Amount is equal to two (2) times Mr. Haugh’s annual rate of base salary and is payable in twenty-four (24) installments. |
28 |
(3) | Amount is equal to the executive’s annual bonus for 2017. Because the executive was employed for the whole year, his pro-rata portion of the bonus is 100%. The executive would have otherwise been required to remain employed through the bonus payment date in order to receive such amount. |
(4) | Amount is equal to eighteen (18) months of COBRA premiums. |
(5) | This amount represents the value of 411,893 RSUs and PSUs based on the per share closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 of $1.29. Of that amount, 65,015 represents a pro-rata portion (i.e., one-third) of the 2017 LTIP PSUs that Mr. Haugh would remain eligible to earn in the event of a termination due to death or disability that occurs prior to the end of the three-year performance period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019, assuming that target PSUs (i.e., 195,045) will be earned with respect to such performance period; 43,744 represents a pro-rata portion (i.e., two-thirds) of the 2016 LTIP PSUs that Mr. Haugh would remain eligible to earn in the event of a termination due to death or disability that occurs prior to the end of the three-year performance period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018, assuming that target PSUs (i.e., 196,850) will be earned with respect to such performance period; 164,217 represents the unvested Make-Whole RSUs as of December 31, 2017 that would become vested upon a termination due to death or disability on such date; 41,408 represents the unvested 2016 LTIP RSUs as of December 31, 2017 that will become vested upon a termination due to death or disability on such date; 97,509 represents the unvested 2017 LTIP RSUs as of December 31, 2017 that will become vested upon a termination due to death or disability on such date. |
(6) | This amount represents the value of 427,542 RSUs and PSUs based on the per share closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 of $1.29. Of that amount, 65,015 represents a pro-rata portion (i.e., one-third) of the 2017 LTIP PSUs that Mr. Haugh would remain eligible to earn in the event of a termination without cause or for good reason that occurs prior to the end of the three-year performance period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019, assuming that target PSUs (i.e., 195,045) will be earned with respect to such performance period; 181,057 represents the 2016 LTIP PSUs that have been or would be converted to time-based RSUs as of December 31 2017 based on actual performance, with such time-based RSUs to be settled on December 31, 2018, provided that Mr. Haugh has continuously complied with the restrictive covenants contained in section 6 of his employment agreement; 164,217 represents the Make-Whole RSUs with respect to which the underlying shares of our common stock would be delivered on the original vesting dates (i.e., February 22, 2018 and February 22, 2019), provided Mr. Haugh has continuously complied with the restrictive covenants contained in section 6 of his employment agreement; and 17,253 represents a pro-rata portion of the 2016 LTIP RSUs that are scheduled to vest on February 22, 2018 (i.e., 20,704 RSUs) but would become vested upon a termination without cause or resignation for good reason, prorated based on the percentage of service performed during the applicable annual vesting period, with such prorated RSUs to be settled on February 22, 2018, provided that Mr. Haugh has continuously complied with the restrictive covenants contained in section 6 of his employment agreement. |
(7) | Amount is equal to eighteen (18) months of the executive’s annual base salary, payable in normal payroll installments over 18 months. |
(8) | This amount represents the value of 111,074 RSUs and PSUs based on the per share closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 of $1.29. Of that amount, 17,731 represents 2017 LTIP PSUs, 44,722 represents 2016 LTIP PSUs, 22,028 represents 2016 LTIP RSUs, and 26,593 represents 2017 LTIP RSUs. With respect to the 2017 LTIP PSUs and the 2016 LTIP PSUs, a pro-rata portion of such PSUs would vest upon the death or disability of Mr. Jones provided the applicable performance metrics are attained with respect to the applicable three-year performance period, prorated based on the percentage of service performed during such performance period. Therefore, assuming that target PSUs will be earned, one-third of the 53,194 2017 LTIP PSUs and two-thirds of the 67,083 2016 LTIP PSUs was included. All of the 2016 LTIP RSUs and 2017 LTIP RSUs that are unvested as of December 31, 2017 would become vested upon a termination due to death or disability, as provided in the applicable equity incentive plan. |
(9) | This amount represents the value of 62,453 PSUs based on the per share closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 of $1.29. Of that amount, 17,731 represents 2017 LTIP PSUs and 44,722 represents 2016 LTIP PSUs. With respect to the 2017 LTIP PSUs and the 2016 LTIP PSUs, a pro-rata portion of such PSUs would vest upon the termination without cause or resignation for good reason of Mr. Jones provided the applicable performance metrics are attained with respect to the applicable three-year performance period, prorated based on the percentage of service performed during such performance period. Therefore, assuming that target PSUs will be earned, one-third of the 53,194 2017 LTIP PSUs and two-thirds of the 67,083 2016 LTIP PSUs was included. |
(10) | This amount represents the value of 90,767 PSUs based on the per share closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 of $1.29. Of that amount, 14,776 represents 2017 LTIP PSUs, 36,066 represents 2016 LTIP PSUs, 17,764 represents 2016 LTIP RSUs, and 22,161 represents 2017 LTIP RSUs. With respect to the 2017 LTIP PSUs and the 2016 LTIP PSUs, a pro-rata portion of such PSUs would vest upon the death or disability of Mr. Schaefer provided the applicable performance metrics are attained with respect to the applicable three-year performance period, prorated based on the percentage of service performed during such performance period. Therefore, assuming that target PSUs will be earned, one-third of the 44,328 2017 LTIP PSUs and two-thirds of the 54,099 2016 LTIP PSUs was included. All of the 2016 LTIP RSUs and 2017 LTIP RSUs that are unvested as of December 31, 2017 would become vested upon a termination due to death or disability, as provided in the applicable equity incentive plan. |
(11) | This amount represents the value of 50,842 PSUs based on the per share closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 of $1.29. Of that amount, 14,776 represents 2017 LTIP PSUs and 36,066 represents 2016 LTIP PSUs. With respect to the 2017 LTIP PSUs and the 2016 LTIP PSUs, a pro-rata portion of such PSUs would vest upon the termination without cause or resignation for good reason of Mr. Schaefer provided the applicable performance metrics are attained with respect to the applicable three-year performance period, prorated based on the percentage of service performed during such performance period. Therefore, assuming that target PSUs will be earned, one-third of the 44,328 2017 LTIP PSUs and two-thirds of the 54,099 2016 LTIP PSUs was included. |
Payments Upon Termination (Following a Change in Control)
The following table quantifies the estimated maximum amount of payments and benefits under our employment agreements, participation agreements to Executive Severance Plan and agreements relating to awards granted under our equity incentive and stock option plans to which the named executive officers would have been entitled upon termination of employment if we had terminated their employment without cause or for good reason immediately after a “change in control” of our Company that (by assumption) occurred on December 31, 2017 and prior to the expiration of their respective employment agreements.
29 |
Name | Cash Severance Payment ($) | Continuation of Medical/Welfare Benefits ($) | Value of Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards ($) | Value of Accelerated Annual Bonus ($) | Total Termination Benefits ($) | |||||||||||||||
John N. Haugh | $ | 4,000,000 | (1) | $ | 23,595 | (2) | $ | 822,798 | (3) | $ | 826,688 | (6) | $ | 5,673,081 | ||||||
F. Peter Cuneo | None | None | None | None | None | |||||||||||||||
David Jones | $ | 2,046,000 | (4) | $ | 42,691 | (2) | $ | 189,033 | (5) | $ | 333,156 | (6) | $ | 2,610,880 | ||||||
Jason Schaefer | $ | 1,650,000 | (4) | $ | 42,691 | (2) | $ | 155,212 | (7) | $ | 448,850 | (6) | $ | 2,296,753 |
(1) | Amount is equal to two (2) times the sum of Mr. Haugh’s annual rate of base salary plus target annual bonus. Such amount is payable in a lump sum. |
(2) | Amount is equal to eighteen (18) months of COBRA premiums. |
(3) | This amount represents the value of 637,828 RSUs based on the per share closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 of $1.29. Of this amount, 164,217 represents Make-Whole RSUs, 17,253 represents 2016 LTIP RSUs, 97,509 represents 2017 LTIP RSUs, 181,057 represents RSUs converted from the 2016 LTIP PSUs, and 195,045 represents target RSUs eligible to be converted from the 2017 LTIP PSUs, each of which will become vested upon a termination without cause or for good reason following a change in control. |
(4) | Amount is equal to two times the sum of the executive’s annual base salary and target annual bonus and is payable in a lump sum. |
(5) | This amount represents the value of 146,537 RSUs based on the per share closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 of $1.29. Of this amount, 22,028 represents the 2016 LTIP RSUs, 26,593 represents the 2017 LTIP RSUs, 44,722 represents RSUs that would be converted from the 2016 LTIP PSUs and 53,194 represents RSUs that would be converted from the 2017 LTIP PSUs, each of which will become vested upon a termination without cause or for good reason following a change in control. |
(6) | Amount is equal to the executive’s annual bonus for 2017. Because the executive was employed for the whole year, his pro-rata portion of the bonus is 100%. The executive would have otherwise been required to remain employed through the bonus payment date in order to receive such amount. |
(7) | This amount represents the value of 120,319 RSUs based on the per share closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 of $1.29. Of this amount, 17,764 represents the 2016 LTIP RSUs, 22,161 represents the 2017 LTIP RSUs, 36,066 represents RSUs that would be converted from the 2016 LTIP PSUs and 44,328 represents RSUs that would be converted from the 2017 LTIP PSUs, each of which will become vested upon a termination without cause or for good reason following a change in control. |
Payments Upon a Change in Control
Name | Value of Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards ($)(1) | |||
John N. Haugh | $ | 960,859 | (2) | |
F. Peter Cuneo | None | |||
David Jones | $ | 189,033 | (3) | |
Jason Schaefer | $ | 155,212 | (4) |
(1) | The amounts reported in this column represent the value of all outstanding PSUs and RSUs held by each named executive officer as of December 31, 2017 that will become immediately vested or, in the case of PSUs, be deemed fully earned at the target amount upon a change in control (to the extent such awards are not assumed or substituted in such change in control), based on the per share closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 of $1.29. |
(2) | This amount relates to a total of 744,852 RSUs and PSUs, consisting of 164,217 (Make-Whole RSUs), 41,408 (2016 LTIP RSUs), 97,509 (2017 LTIP RSUs), 181,057 (RSUs converted from the 2016 LTIP PSUs), 65,616 (2016 LTIP PSUs that have not been converted to RSUs as of December 31, 2017), and 195,045 (2017 LTIP PSUs). |
(3) | This amount relates to a total of 146,537 RSUs and PSUs, consisting of 22,028 (2016 LTIP RSUs), 26,593 (2017 LTIP RSUs), 44,722 (RSUs that would be converted from the 2016 LTIP PSUs) and 53,194 (RSUs that would be converted from the 2017 LTIP PSUs), each of which will become vested upon a change in control. |
(4) | This amount relates to a total of 120,319 RSUs and PSUs, consisting of 17,764 (2016 LTIP RSUs), 22,161 (2017 LTIP RSUs), 36,066 (RSUs that would be converted from the 2016 LTIP PSUs) and 44,328 (RSUs that would be converted from the 2017 LTIP PSUs), each of which will become vested upon a change in control. |
30 |
Pay Ratio
Federal law requires that we disclose the ratio of our CEO’s total compensation to the total compensation of our median employee (determined on the basis of compensation and by excluding the CEO). To determine this ratio, we collected data from our global workforce consisting of all U.S. and non-U.S. full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees of the Company and any of its consolidated subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2017. No assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to compensation were made. We used actual payroll records, as maintained in the ordinary course, to determine annual compensation and to identify our median employee. The median employee’s total compensation was calculated using the same methodology used to calculate the annual total compensation of the CEO as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table included in the Executive Compensation section of this Annual Report. The median employee's total compensation was $80,141, and the total compensation of the CEO was $4,058,991. Accordingly, the CEO’s annual total compensation is 51 times that of the median employee. Due to the flexibility afforded by SEC rules in calculating the CEO pay ratio, this ratio may not be comparable to CEO pay ratios presented by other issuers.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee determined that for service as a director of our Company during 2017, each non-employee member of the Board of Directors would receive a cash payment of $80,000 payable one half on January 1st and one half on July 1st, and a number of shares of restricted stock with an aggregate value of $120,000 based on the closing price of the first trading day of each new year, with all of such shares vesting in full on July 1st of the year of grant. Directors who are elected to the Board after January 1st receive a cash payment equal to a pro-rata portion of $80,000 and an equity grant equal to a number of shares of restricted stock with an aggregate value representing a pro-rata portion of $120,000, vesting six months from the date of grant. Additionally, each Chairperson of the Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees would receive additional cash payments of $25,000, $20,000 and $15,000, respectively, and a Lead Director would receive an additional cash payment of $40,000. Following a detailed review of Audit Committee activities during 2017 and the considerable time and attention the Company required from the Audit Committee and its members, the Compensation Committee determined that in 2017, each member of the Audit Committee would receive an incremental $30,000 for their work, and the chairperson would receive an incremental $60,000.
In August 2017, the Board of Directors also formed a Special Committee to engage in a broad review of possible strategic alternatives for the Company. The Board appointed each of Ms. Gove and Messrs. Marcum and Friedman to serve on such committee, with Mr. Slutsky serving as its chairman, and resolved that each member of the committee would receive fees, commencing September 1, 2017, in the amount of $10,000 per calendar month, with the chairperson of such committee receiving $15,000 per calendar month. Following the Special Committee’s review, the committee was dissolved on October 15, 2017.
In 2017, Mr. Cuneo was compensated for service in the role of our Chairman of the Board. Since December 18, 2017, Mr. Cuneo has served as our Executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Cuneo will not receive compensation in respect of his service as a director during the period he is employed by us.
The following table sets forth compensation information for 2017 for each person who served as a member of our Board of Directors at any time during 2017 who is not also a current executive officer. An executive officer who serves on our Board of Directors does not receive additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Total ($) | |||||||||
F. Peter Cuneo(3) | 140,000 | 120,000 | 260,000 | |||||||||
Drew Cohen(4) | 150,000 | 120,000 | 270,000 | |||||||||
Mark Friedman(5) | 145,000 | 120,000 | 265,000 | |||||||||
Sue Gove(6) | 180,000 | 120,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||
James A. Marcum (7) | 140,000 | 120,000 | 260,000 | |||||||||
Sanjay Khosla(8) | 80,000 | 120,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||
Kristen O’Hara(9) | 80,000 | 120,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||
Kenneth Slutsky(10) | 102,500 | 120,000 | 222,500 |
31 |
(1) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value, determined without regards to forfeitures. See Note 5 to Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion for the relevant assumptions used in calculating grant date fair value. |
(2) | In 2017, there were no outstanding options at fiscal year-end for directors. |
(3) | Fees earned or paid in cash to Mr. Cuneo include (i) $80,000 attributable to annual cash director fees and (ii) $60,000 attributable to annual Chairman fee. |
(4) | Fees earned or paid in cash to Mr. Cohen include (i) $80,000 attributable to annual cash director fees, (ii) $40,000 attributable to annual Lead Director fee and (iii) $30,000 attributable to 2017 Audit Committee member fees. |
(5) | Fees earned or paid in cash to Mr. Friedman include (i) $80,000 attributable to annual cash director fees, (ii) $20,000 attributable to annual Compensation Committee chairman fee; (iii) $30,000 attributable to 2017 Audit Committee member fees and (iv) $15,000 attributable to Special Committee member fees. |
(6) | Fees earned or paid in cash to Ms. Gove include (i) $80,000 attributable to annual cash director fees, (ii) $85,000 attributable to 2017 Audit Committee chairperson fee; and (iii) $15,000 attributable to Special Committee member fees. |
(7) | Fees earned or paid in cash to Mr. Marcum include (i) $80,000 attributable to annual cash director fees, (ii) $15,000 attributable to annual Governance Committee chairman fee; (iii) $30,000 attributable to 2017 Audit Committee member fees and (iv) $15,000 attributable to Special Committee member fees. |
(8) | Fees earned or paid in cash to Mr. Khosla include $80,000 attributable to annual cash director fees. |
(9) | Fees earned or paid in cash to Ms. O’Hara include $80,000 attributable to annual cash director fees. As previously disclosed in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 24, 2018, Ms. O’Hara resigned from the Board on January 18, 2018. |
(10) | Fees earned or paid in cash to Mr. Slutsky include (i) $80,000 attributable to annual cash director fees, and (ii) $22,500 attributable to Special Committee chairman fees. |
Director Compensation for 2018. Following its annual review of director compensation, the Compensation Committee determined, given the limited availability of shares of common stock of the Company available for grant under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the number of shares of common stock of the Company required to be reserved for issuance in connection with the issuance of the Company’s 5.75% Convertible Senior Subordinated Secured Second Lien Notes due 2023, to pay in cash for 2018 that portion of director compensation historically settled in equity. Therefore, for service as a director of our company during 2018, each non-employee member of the Board of Directors will receive a cash payment of $80,000 payable one half on January 1st and one half on July 1st, and additional cash payments totaling $120,000, with such additional cash compensation vesting in 12 equal monthly installments. Directors will not receive equity grants in respect of 2018 service on our Board. Additionally, each Chairperson of the Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees will receive additional cash payments of $35,000, $20,000 and $15,000, respectively.
In addition to the fees noted above, Mr. Cohen will receive $40,000 in annual cash fees for his service as Lead Director.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table presents information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 20, 2018 by each of our directors and our named executive officers, all of our executive officers and directors, as a group, and each person known by us to beneficially hold more than five percent of our common stock, based on information obtained from such persons.
Unless indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all securities beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. The shares “beneficially owned” by a person are determined in accordance with the definition of “beneficial ownership” set forth in the regulations of the SEC and, accordingly, shares of our common stock underlying options, warrants, restricted stock units and other convertible securities that are exercisable or convertible within 60 days of April 20, 2018 and shares of our common stock underlying restricted stock awards that vest within 60 days of April 20, 2018 are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities and to be outstanding for purposes of determining such holder’s percentage ownership. The same securities may be beneficially owned by more than one person. Percentage ownership is based on 65,496,145 shares of our common stock outstanding as of April 20, 2018. The address for each beneficial owner, unless otherwise noted, is c/o Iconix Brand Group, Inc. at 1450 Broadway, New York, New York 10018.
32 |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
Percentage of Company’s Outstanding Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
||||||
John N. Haugh | 484,184 | * | ||||||
David K. Jones | 77,003 | * | ||||||
Jason Schaefer | 55,446 | * | ||||||
F. Peter Cuneo | 322,935 | * | ||||||
Drew Cohen | 61,737 | * | ||||||
Mark Friedman | 65,981 | * | ||||||
Sue Gove | 30,052 | * | ||||||
James A. Marcum | 74,057 | * | ||||||
Sanjay Khosla | 15,481 | * | ||||||
Kenneth W. Slutsky | 14,127 | * | ||||||
UBS Group AG 1450 Broadway New York, NY 10018 |
15,482,168 | (1) | 23.63 | % | ||||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022 |
3,422,732 | (2) | 5.2 | % | ||||
The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 |
3,735,581 | (3) | 5.7 | % | ||||
Sports Direct International plc Unit A Brook Park East Shirebrook, England NG20 8RY |
5,651,532 | (4) | 8.6 | % | ||||
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Building One 6300 Bee Cave Road Austin, TX 78746 |
4,224,437 | (5) | 6.4 | % | ||||
Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. 225 Liberty Street New York, NY 10281 |
6,000,855 | (6) | 9.2 | % | ||||
Monecor (London) Limited (trading as ETX Capital) One Broadgate London EC2M 2QS United Kingdom |
5,001,575 | (7) | 7.6 | % | ||||
Radcliffe Capital Management, L.P. 50 Monument Road, Suite 300 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 |
5,962,598 | (8) | 9.1 | % | ||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons) |
1,201,003 | 1.8 | % |
* | Less than 1% |
(1) |
Based on a Schedule 13G filed on April 10, 2018, UBS Group AG disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities. These shares are beneficially owned by the UBS Asset Management division of UBS Group AG and its subsidiaries and affiliates on behalf of its clients. This filing does not reflect securities, if any, beneficially owned by any other division of UBS Group AG. |
33 |
(2) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 25, 2018, BlackRock, Inc. is deemed to have beneficial ownership of these shares. Various persons have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, such shares. The BlackRock, Inc., subsidiaries which acquired these shares are BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V.; BlackRock Advisors, LLC; BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited; BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited; BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG; BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.; BlackRock Fund Advisors; BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.; BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited; BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd. and BlackRock Investment Management, LLC. BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting and dispositive power in respect of these shares. |
(3) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 9, 2018, The Vanguard Group, Inc. (the “Vanguard Group”) is deemed to have beneficial ownership of these shares, of which (i) 52,264 shares are owned beneficially by Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Vanguard Group, as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts and (ii) 8,871 shares are owned beneficially by Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., as a result of its serving as an investment manager of Australian investment offerings. |
(4) | Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed on November 3, 2017, Sports Direct International pcl (“Sports Direct”) is deemed to have an indirect economic interest in these shares. Such interest is held through contracts for differences or “CFDs” with Monecor (London) Limited, trading as ETX Capital. Pursuant to the CFDs, Sports Direct does not have the power to vote or direct the vote, or power to dispose or direct the disposition of any of the shares, and therefore the beneficial ownership is disclaimed pursuant to Rules 13d-4 and 16a-1(a)(4) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for Section 13(d) and Section 16(a) purposes. |
(5) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 9, 2018, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is deemed to have beneficial ownership of these shares. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, furnishes investment advice to four investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as investment manager to certain other commingled group trusts and separate accounts (such investment companies, trusts and accounts, collectively referred to as the “Funds”). In certain cases, subsidiaries of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP may act as an adviser or sub-adviser to certain Funds. In its role as investment advisor, sub-adviser and/or manager, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP or its subsidiaries (collectively, “Dimensional”) possess voting and/or investment power over the securities of the Company that are owned by the Funds, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of the Company held by the Funds. However, all securities reported in this schedule are owned by the Funds. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities. |
(6) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A jointly filed on February 6, 2018, Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. (“Oppenheimer Funds”) and Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund (“Oppenheimer Global Opportunities”) are deemed to have beneficial ownership of these shares. Oppenheimer Funds is an investment adviser in accordance with Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(E) and Oppenheimer Global Opportunities is an investment company registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Oppenheimer Funds and Oppenheimer Global Opportunities have shared voting power over the securities and disclaim beneficial ownership of such securities. |
(7) | Based on a Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2018, Monecor (London) Limited is deemed to have beneficial ownership of these shares. |
(8) | Based on Schedule 13G filed, on March 5, 2018, (i) 5,961,598 shares are deemed beneficially owned by Radcliffe Capital Management, L.P., RGC Management Company, LLC, and Steven B. Katznelson, (ii) 5,962,598 shares are deemed beneficially owned by Christopher Hinkel, and (iii) 5,464,054 shares deemed beneficially owned by Radcliffe Ultra Short Duration Master Fund, L.P. and Radcliffe Capital Investors, LLC (all reporting persons on this Schedule 13G, the “Radcliffe Holders”). The Radcliffe Holders disclaim beneficial ownership of such securities. Each of the Radcliffe Holders has shared voting power over the securities that it is deemed to beneficially own, other than 1,000 shares that Christopher Hinkel is deemed to beneficially own. |
34 |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all of the Company’s equity compensation plans in effect as of December 31, 2017.
Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: | 40,000 | $ | 9.47 | 1,786,128 | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | $ | — | — | ||||||||
Total | 40,000 | $ | 9.47 | 1,786,128 |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Pursuant to its charter, our audit committee must review and approve, where appropriate, all related party transactions.
During FY 2017, the Company incurred less than $0.1 million in advertising expenses with Galore Media, Inc. to promote certain of the Company’s brands and for the rights to certain warrants of Galore Media, Inc. The Company owned a minority interest in Galore Media, Inc. The Company sold its interest in Galore Media during FY 2017 as discussed in Note 4. Management believes that all transactions were made on terms and conditions no less favorable than those available in the marketplace from unrelated parties.
During FY 2016 and FY 2015, the Company incurred less than $0.1 million per year in consulting fees in connection with a consulting arrangement entered into with Mark Friedman, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, relating to the provision by Mr. Friedman of investor relations services. Such consulting agreement was terminated on May 3, 2016. There were no such consulting fees incurred during FY 2017.
The Company has entered into certain license agreements in which the core licensee is also one of our joint venture partners. As of December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, the Company recognized the following royalty revenue amounts:
FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | ||||||||||
Joint Venture Partner | ||||||||||||
Global Brands Group Asia Limited(1)(2) | $ | 18,011 | $ | 3,696 | $ | 5,672 | ||||||
Buffalo International ULC | 690 | 13,848 | 12,311 | |||||||||
Rise Partners, LLC / Top On International Group Limited | 1,054 | 2,050 | 5,469 | |||||||||
M.G.S. Sports Trading Limited | 576 | 615 | 609 | |||||||||
Pac Brands USA, Inc. | 278 | 434 | 519 | |||||||||
Albion Equity Partners LLC / GL Damek | 2,264 | 2,177 | 2,556 | |||||||||
Anthony L&S | 165 | — | 1,454 | |||||||||
Roc Nation | — | — | 400 | |||||||||
MHMC(3) | 1,800 | 1,240 | 300 | |||||||||
$ | 24,838 | $ | 24,060 | $ | 29,290 |
(1) | Royalty revenue of less than $0.1 million, approximately $0.5 million, and approximately $1.0 million for FY 2017, FY 2016 and FY 2015, respectively, which is included in the amounts presented in the table above, relates to royalty revenue associated with Peanuts Worldwide which has been reclassified in to income from discontinued operations on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented. |
35 |
Additionally, GBG also served as agent to Peanuts
Worldwide for the Greater China Territory for Peanuts brands. As of June 30, 2017, due to the completion of the sale
of the Entertainment segment, GBG is no longer a related party in its capacity as agent of Peanuts Worldwide. For the
years ended FY 2017, FY 2016 and FY 2015, Global Brands Group Asia Limited earned fees of approximately $0.7 million, $3.3 million,
and $3.0 million, respectively, in its capacity as agent to Peanuts Worldwide which have been recorded within discontinued operations
in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.
(2) | Prior to February 2017, Buffalo International ULC maintained the Buffalo license agreement. However, starting in February 2017, Buffalo International ULC effectively assigned the Buffalo license agreement to GBG. The license revenue from the Buffalo license agreement represents approximately $16.1 million of the total license revenue for GBG shown in the table above for FY 2017. |
(3) | MHMC became a related party to the Company in July 2016 upon consummation of an agreement between a Company subsidiary and MHMC to sell to MHMC up to an aggregate 50% ownership interest in Umbro China. Refer to Note 4 for further details. |
Board Independence
Our Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Cohen, Friedman, Marcum, Khosla and Slutsky and Ms. Gove are each an “independent director” under the applicable Listing Rules of NASDAQ.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed by BDO USA, LLP for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for 2017 and 2016, internal controls over financial reporting and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q, comfort letters and consents related to SEC registration statements for 2017 and 2016 totaled approximately $1,667,709 and $1,608,115 respectively.
Audit-Related Fees. There were approximately $380,842 and $800,934 aggregate fees billed by BDO USA, LLP for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and other capital raising activities for 2017 and 2016, respectively, and that are not disclosed in the paragraph captioned “Audit Fees” above.
Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed by BDO USA, LLP for professional services rendered for tax compliance and consulting for 2017 and 2016, were approximately $355,108 and $302,939, respectively.
All Other Fees. There were no fees billed by BDO USA, LLP, for products and services other than the services described in the paragraphs captioned “Audit Fees”, “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees” above for 2017 and 2016.
The Audit Committee has established its pre-approval policies and procedures, pursuant to which the Audit Committee approved the foregoing audit services provided by BDO USA, LLP in 2017. Consistent with the Audit Committee’s responsibility for engaging the Company’s independent auditors, all audit and permitted non-audit services require pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The full Audit Committee approves proposed services and fee estimates for these services. The Audit Committee chairperson or their designee has been designated by the Audit Committee to approve any services arising during the year that were not pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Services approved by the Audit Committee chairperson are communicated to the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting and the Audit Committee reviews services and fees for the fiscal year at each such meeting. Pursuant to these procedures, the Audit Committee approved all the foregoing audit services and permissible non-audit services provided by BDO USA, LLP.
36 |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC. | |||
Date: April 30, 2018 | By: | /s/ John N. Haugh | |
John N. Haugh | |||
President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
/s/ F. Peter Cuneo | |||
F. Peter Cuneo | |||
Executive Chairman of the Board | |||
/s/ David K. Jones | |||
David K. Jones | |||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
37 |
38 |
39 |
40 |
41 |
Exhibit Numbers |
Description | |
32.2 | Certification of Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(60) | |
32.3 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(60) | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document(60) | |
101.SCH | XBRL Schema Document(60) | |
101.CAL | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document (60) | |
101.DEF | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document(60) | |
101.LAB | XBRL Label Linkbase Document(60) | |
101.PRE | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document(60) |
(1) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated October 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(2) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated March 9, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(3) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated April 26, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(4) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated April 26, 2011 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(5) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated October 26, 2011 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(6) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated November 30, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(7) | [Intentionally omitted.] |
(8) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated June 21, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(9) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(10) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated August 6, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(11) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated May 17, 2011 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(12) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated November 29, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(13) | Intentionally omitted. |
(14) | Filed as Exhibit A to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement dated July 18, 2000 as filed on Schedule 14A and incorporated by reference herein. |
(15) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2002 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(16) | Filed as Exhibit B to the Company’s definitive proxy statement dated May 28, 2002 as filed on Schedule 14A and incorporated by reference herein. |
(17) | Filed as Appendix B to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement dated July 2, 2001 as filed on Schedule 14A and incorporated by reference herein. |
(18) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(19) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated July 31, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(20) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(21) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the transition period from February 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein. |
42 |
(22) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(23) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated November 7, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(24) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(25) | Filed as Annex B to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on April 7, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(26) | [Intentionally omitted.] |
(27) | [Intentionally omitted.] |
(28) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(29) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(30) | [Intentionally omitted.] |
(31) | [Intentionally omitted.] |
(32) | [Intentionally omitted.] |
(33) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated November 22, 2011 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(34) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated March 5, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(35) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated February 15, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(36) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(37) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(38) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(39) | [Intentionally omitted.] |
(40) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated March 12, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(41) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated January 27, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein, |
(42) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(43) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated February 18, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(44) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated March 7, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(45) | Filed as Annex A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement dated October 23, 2015 as filed on Schedule 14A and incorporated by reference herein. |
(46) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(47) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(48) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated June 10, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(49) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated September 28, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(50) | Filed as Annex A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement dated October 4, 2016 as filed on Schedule 14A and incorporated by reference herein. |
(51) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(52) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A for the event dated May 9, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(53) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated August 2, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(54) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated August 18, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein. |
43 |
(55) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated October 27, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(56) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated November 24, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(57) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated December 13, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(58) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated February 12, 2018 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(59) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated February 22, 2018 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(60) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 dated March 14, 2018 and incorporated by reference herein. |
(61) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated March 26, 2018 and incorporated by reference herein. |
* | Denotes management compensation plan or arrangement |
+ | Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Iconix Brand Group, Inc. hereby undertakes to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission copies of any of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
++ | Filed herewith. |
44 |