Top
Image Systems Ltd.
|
|||
Date: December
27, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Ido Schechter | |
Ido Schechter | |||
Chief Executive Officer | |||
Reznik Paz
Nevo Trusts Ltd. |
Reznik Paz
Nevo Trusts Ltd. |
|
.1.
|
Report to Holders and
discussion of Company suggestions, as they are
raised.
|
|
.2.
|
Approval of Company
suggestions, as they are raised, or call for immediate repayment of
Debentures (Series A)
|
|
.3.
|
Hiring Legal Counsel
and Experts by the Trustee
|
|
.3.1.
|
Approval and
ratification of hiring of legal counsel for the Trustee – approval
and ratification of hiring attorneys from the offices of M Piron &
Associates to serve as legal counsel to the Trustee in its maintenance and
protection of the rights of the Holders by the Company, and, among others,
to take action, including legal action, as deemed necessary by the Trustee
or legal counsel according to the changing circumstances, for the purpose
of implementing a decision for immediate repayment as stated in clause 2
above, in case will be approved in the meeting, and/or to enforce the
Company’s commitments toward the Holders stemming from the Debentures and
the Trust note, as well as any other way the Trustee and legal counsel
deem necessary.
|
|
.3.2.
|
Authorizing the
Trustee to hire experts – authorizing the Trustee to hire experts
(economic or other) (in addition to legal counsel as stated in clause 3.1
above), as they are deemed necessary by the Trustee and/or legal counsel
for assisting the Trustee for the rights of the Holders of the Debentures,
maintaining them and their utilization with the
Company.
|
|
It
is hereby clarified that any of the decisions in clauses 2 and 3 above are
subject to the commitment for indemnification and funding in clause 4
below, and to that extent clause 4 below should
be considered an inseparable part of each and every resolution proposals
in clauses 2 and 3 above.
|
Reznik Paz
Nevo Trusts Ltd. |
|
.4.
|
Indemnification of the
trustee, legal counsel and experts and funding their
activity
|
|
.4.1.
|
The first
priority – funding the expenses of the trustee, legal counsel and
experts (hereinafter: the "Activity Funding") will be done by the Company
as it agrees to do so.
|
|
.4.2.
|
The second priority
– In case the Company does not agree to the Activity Funding and/or
will not actually bear the costs of the Activity Funding, funding will
made out of the interest and/or the principal the Company is required to
pay the Holders of the Debentures (series A).
|
|
In
the aforementioned case, the Trustee will be authorized to set an amount
which will be deducted from the aforementioned payments and be placed with
the trustee as a security for the Activity Funding and the Indemnification
of the trustee, legal counsel and experts (hereinafter: the "Security").
The Trustee will be authorized to create an additional Security as
detailed above occasionally, in a sum it will determine.
|
|
.4.3.
|
Third priority
– if the Trustee determines that the Security is insufficient to
cover the expenses of the experts, legal counsel and the Trustee, the
Holders will deposit an amount determined by the Trustee to cover the
remaining expenses of the experts, legal counsel and the trustee
(hereinafter: Additional Deposit). In light of the above, any Holders who
will vote in favor of the resolution proposals in clauses 2 and 3 above
are obligated to deposit with the Trustee an amount of no less than their
pro rata share (as defined below) of the Security amount as set by the
Trustee. After covering the expenses and fees of the trustee according to
the instructions of the trust note and payment of all the expenses of the
trustee for engaging legal counsel and experts, the amounts collected from
the company, whether by mutual consent, by any legal proceedings or
otherwise, will be used to reimburse the Bond Holders who took part in the
Activity Funding, prior and in preference to payment to the rest of the
Holders.
|
Reznik Paz
Nevo Trusts Ltd. |
|
(i)
|
To
the extent possible, the payment will be done through an offset of the
interest and/or principal payments payable to the holders who voted in
favor of the aforementioned decisions.
|
|
(ii)
|
Nothing
contained in the obligation for indemnification shall be deemed to
derogate from the obligation institution holders who voted against the aforementioned decision
proposals (for that purpose - institution holders shall have the meaning
given to such term in the Securities Ordinances (Method of Public
Allocation of Securities), 2007), (as they apply to them) according to the
instructions of the Ministry of the Treasury, as they may occasionally be,
regarding the obligation to fund the expenses of the aforementioned
trustee, the representative body and the experts.
|
|
(iii)
|
Nothing
contained in the obligation for indemnification shall be deemed to
derogate from the Company’s obligation to indemnify the trustee according
to the trust note as such an obligation
exists.
|
Reznik Paz
Nevo Trusts Ltd. |
|
.5.
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
.1.
|
Debentures Holders
(series A) eligible for participation and voting at the
meeting
|
|
.1.1.
|
Certification
from a member of the exchange regarding a balance of Debentures owned by
such Holder as of the Record Date; or
|
|
.1.2.
|
Autonomous
power of attorney from the Hapoalim bank transfer agent company as number
of Debentures registered in such company’s name in the Series A Bond
Holders’ register as of the Record Date (according to which the official
representative of the transfer agent not prohibited from exercising his or
her discretion at thevote).
|
|
.2.
|
Quorum
|
Reznik Paz
Nevo Trusts Ltd. |
|
It
is hereby clarified that for calculation of a quorum in a special
resolution meeting, the votes of Holders who are holders of a
controlling interest in the Company, or who are a relevant side in Company
decisions, companies own by these sides or connected companies to these
sides, as defined by the Securities Law, with the exception of any of
those who is an investor included in listed investors in the first
addition to the Securities Law (as per clause 15a(b)(1) to the Securities
Law), who is not investing on his own behalf, and whose vote will be
counted.
|
|
.3.
|
The necessary majority
required for a resolution of the Bond
Holders
|
|
It
is hereby clarified that for calculation of a votes in a special
resolution meeting, the votes of Holders who are holders of a
controlling interest in the Company, or who are a relevant side in Company
decisions, companies own by these sides or connected companies to these
sides, as defined by the Securities Law, with the exception of any of
those who is an investor included in listed investors in the first
addition to the Securities Law (as per clause 15a(b)(1) to the Securities
Law), who is not investing on his own behalf, and whose vote will be
counted.
|
|
.4.
|
Calling a postponed
meeting
|
Reznik Paz
Nevo Trusts Ltd. |
|
.5.
|
Voting by
Proxy
|
|
.6.
|
Review of
documents:
|