UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-4841
MFS MUNICIPAL INCOME TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
500 Boylston Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Susan S. Newton
Massachusetts Financial Services Company
500 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(Name and address of agents for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (617) 954-5000
Date of fiscal year end: October 31
Date of reporting period: April 30, 2010
ITEM 1. | REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS. |
Semiannual report
MFS® Municipal Income Trust
4/30/10
MFM-SEM
MFS® Municipal Income Trust
New York Stock Exchange Symbol: MFM
NOT FDIC INSURED MAY LOSE VALUE NO BANK GUARANTEE
Dear Shareholders:
After having suffered their biggest declines since the Great Depression, most global markets experienced an impressive resurgence during the latter months of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. The global economy was able to reap the benefits of two major trends. The first of these was the massive efforts of governments and central banks to increase liquidity in the financial system as they sought to prevent the credit crisis from further affecting the banking system. The second was the move by companies around the world to cut costs and operations to prepare for rapidly changing market conditions. We believe that these moves not only shortened the length of the downturn but also set the stage for recovery.
Even with the significant market gains of 2009 and the early part of 2010, the recovery is unrolling at a moderate pace, with rebounds in the manufacturing sector and corporate America leading the way. Central bankers are proceeding with caution and have held benchmark interest rates unchanged as they debate the best way to withdraw stimulus measures without disrupting the fragile growth process.
While hurdles remain, we believe that the global economy is on the road to recovery. As always, we continue to be mindful of the many challenges faced at the individual, national, and international levels. It is at times such as these that we want to remind investors of the merits of maintaining a long-term view, adhering to basic investing principles such as asset allocation and diversification, and working closely with advisors to identify and research investment opportunities. At MFS®, we take particular pride in how well mutual funds can help investors by providing the diversification that is important in any type of market climate.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer
MFS Investment Management®
June 15, 2010
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
(a) | Included in the rating categories are: debt securities, primary inverse floaters, and the underlying bonds of non-primary inverse floaters which have long-term public ratings. All rated securities are assigned a rating in accordance with the following ratings hierarchy: If a security is rated by Moodys, then that rating is used; if not rated by Moodys, then a Standard & Poors rating is used; if not rated by S&P, then a Fitch rating is used. Any equity securities are listed separately. The Other category includes cash, other assets, liabilities (including any derivative offsets), short-term and unrated debt securities. Ratings from Moodys (e.g., Aaa) are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g. AAA). All ratings are subject to change. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bonds price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if applicable. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolios ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. |
(m) | In determining an instruments effective maturity for purposes of calculating the funds dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instruments stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instruments stated maturity. |
Percentages are based on net assets, including preferred shares, as of 4/30/10, unless otherwise noted.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
2
After having suffered through one of the largest and most concentrated downturns since the 1930s, most asset markets staged a remarkable rebound during 2009 and early 2010. This recovery in global activity, which covers this reporting period, has been led importantly by emerging Asian economies, but broadening to include most of the global economy to varying degrees. Primary drivers of the recovery included an unwinding of the inventory destocking that took place earlier, the production of manufacturing and capital goods, as well as massive fiscal and monetary stimulus.
During the worst of the credit crisis, policy makers globally loosened monetary and fiscal policy on a massive scale. Having reached their lower bound on policy rates prior to the beginning of the reporting period, several central banks were implementing quantitative easing as a means to further loosen monetary policy to offset the continuing fall in global economic activity. However, by the beginning of the period, there were ever-broadening signs that the global macroeconomic deterioration had passed, which caused the subsequent rise in asset valuations. As most asset prices rebounded during the period and the demand for liquidity waned, the debate concerning the existence of asset bubbles and the need for monetary exit strategies had begun, creating added uncertainty regarding the forward path of policy rates. Nonetheless, risky-asset valuation generally hit secular highs by the end of the period.
3
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE, PRINCIPAL
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AND RISKS
OF THE FUND
Investment Objective
The funds investment objective is to seek high current income exempt from federal income tax, but may also consider capital appreciation. The funds objective may be changed without shareholder approval.
Principal Investment Strategies
The fund invests, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets, including assets attributable to preferred shares and borrowings for investment purposes, in municipal bonds (debt securities issued by or on behalf of states, territories, possessions of the United States, District of Columbia, and their political subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities, the interest on which is exempt from federal income tax). This policy may not be changed without shareholder approval. Interest from the funds investments may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.
MFS may invest 25% or more of the funds total assets in municipal instruments that finance similar projects, such as those relating to education, healthcare, housing, utilities, water, or sewers.
MFS may invest up to 100% of the funds assets in lower quality debt instruments.
MFS may invest a relatively high percentage of the funds assets in the debt instruments of a single issuer or a small number of issuers.
MFS may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the fund, or as alternatives to direct investments.
MFS uses a bottom-up investment approach in buying and selling investments for the fund. Investments are selected primarily based on fundamental analysis of instruments and their issuers in light of current market, economic, political, and regulatory conditions. Factors considered may include the instruments credit quality, collateral characteristics, and indenture provisions, and the issuers management ability, capital structure, leverage, and ability to meet its current obligations. Quantitative analysis of the structure of the instrument and its features may also be considered.
The fund uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares and/or the creation of tender option bonds, and then investing the proceeds pursuant to its investment strategies. If approved by the funds Board of Trustees, the fund may use leverage by other methods.
MFS may engage in active and frequent trading in pursuing the funds principal investment strategies.
4
Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Risks of the Fund continued
In response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, MFS may depart from the funds principal investment strategies by temporarily investing for defensive purposes.
Principal Risks
The portfolios yield and share prices change daily based on the credit quality of its investments and changes in interest rates. In general, the value of debt securities will decline when interest rates rise and will increase when interest rates fall. Debt securities with longer maturity dates will generally be subject to greater price fluctuations than those with shorter maturities. Municipal instruments can be volatile and significantly affected by adverse tax or court rulings, legislative or political changes and the financial condition of the issuers and/or insurers of municipal instruments. If the Internal Revenue Service determines an issuer of a municipal security has not complied with applicable tax requirements, interest from the security could become taxable and the security could decline significantly in value. Derivatives can be highly volatile and involve risks in addition to those of the underlying indicators in whose value the derivative is based. Gains or losses from derivatives can be substantially greater than the derivatives original cost. Lower quality debt securities involve substantially greater risk of default and their value can decline significantly over time. To the extent that investments are purchased with the issuance of preferred shares, the funds net asset value will increase or decrease at a greater rate than a comparable unleveraged fund. When you sell your shares, they may be worth more or less than the amount you paid for them. Please see the funds registration statement for further information regarding these and other risk considerations. A copy of the funds registration statement on Form N-2 is available on the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commissions Internet Web site at http://sec.gov.
In accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the fund hereby gives notice that it may from time to time repurchase common and/or preferred shares of the fund in the open market at the option of the Board of Trustees and on such terms as the Trustees shall determine.
5
Gary Lasman | | Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2002; Portfolio Manager of the Fund since April 2006. | ||
Geoffrey Schechter | | Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 1993. Portfolio Manager of the Fund since July 2004. |
The funds shares may trade at a discount or premium to net asset value. Shareholders do not have the right to cause the fund to repurchase their shares at net asset value. When fund shares trade at a premium, buyers pay more than the net asset value underlying fund shares, and shares purchased at a premium would receive less than the amount paid for them in the event of the funds liquidation. As a result, the total return that is calculated based on the net asset value and New York Stock Exchange price can be different.
6
CASH PURCHASE PLAN
The fund offers a Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan (the Plan) that allows common shareholders to reinvest either all of the distributions paid by the fund or only the long-term capital gains. Generally, purchases are made at the market price unless that price exceeds the net asset value (the shares are trading at a premium). If the shares are trading at a premium, purchases will be made at a price of either the net asset value or 95% of the market price, whichever is greater. You can also buy shares on a quarterly basis in any amount $100 and over. The Plan Agent will purchase shares under the Cash Purchase Plan on the 15th of January, April, July, and October or shortly thereafter.
If shares are registered in your own name, new shareholders will automatically participate in the Plan, unless you have indicated that you do not wish to participate. If your shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you may wish to request that your shares be re-registered in your own name so that you can participate. There is no service charge to reinvest distributions, nor are there brokerage charges for shares issued directly by the fund. However, when shares are bought on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise on the open market, each participant pays a pro rata share of the transaction expenses, including commissions. Dividends and capital gains distributions are taxable whether received in cash or reinvested in additional shares the automatic reinvestment of distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be payable (or required to be withheld) on the distributions.
You may withdraw from the Plan at any time by going to the Plan Agents website at www.computershare.com, by calling 1-800-637-2304 any business day from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time or by writing to the Plan Agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078. Please have available the name of the fund and your account number. For certain types of registrations, such as corporate accounts, instructions must be submitted in writing. Please call for additional details. When you withdraw from the Plan, you can receive the value of the reinvested shares in one of three ways: your full shares will be held in your account, the Plan Agent will sell your shares and send the proceeds to you, or you may transfer your full shares to your investment professional who can hold or sell them. Additionally, the Plan Agent will sell your fractional shares and send the proceeds to you.
If you have any questions or for further information or a copy of the Plan, contact the Plan Agent Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the Transfer Agent for the fund) at 1-800-637-2304, at the Plan Agents website at www.computershare.com, or by writing to the Plan Agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078.
7
4/30/10 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Municipal Bonds - 141.9% | ||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Airport & Port Revenue - 2.7% | ||||||
Branson, MO, Regional Airport Transportation Development District Airport Rev., B, 6%, 2025 | $ | 325,000 | $ | 179,212 | ||
Branson, MO, Regional Airport Transportation Development District Airport Rev., B, 6%, 2037 | 100,000 | 55,132 | ||||
Branson, MO, Regional Airport Transportation Development District Airport Rev., B, 6%, 2037 | 675,000 | 372,141 | ||||
Chicago, IL, OHare International Airport Rev. (Third Lien Passenger Facility), B, AGM, 5.75%, 2022 | 3,000,000 | 3,176,729 | ||||
Maryland Economic Development Corp. Rev. (Terminal Project), B, 5.375%, 2025 | 195,000 | 197,794 | ||||
Maryland Economic Development Corp. Rev. (Terminal Project), B, 5.75%, 2035 | 375,000 | 382,448 | ||||
Oklahoma City, OK, Airport Trust Rev., AGM, 5.75%, 2016 | 3,125,000 | 3,137,813 | ||||
$ | 7,501,269 | |||||
General Obligations - General Purpose - 0.3% | ||||||
Luzerne County, PA, AGM, 6.75%, 2023 | $ | 870,000 | $ | 933,597 | ||
General Obligations - Improvement - 0.2% | ||||||
Guam Government, A, 6.75%, 2029 | $ | 270,000 | $ | 292,888 | ||
Guam Government, A, 7%, 2039 | 305,000 | 332,429 | ||||
$ | 625,317 | |||||
General Obligations - Schools - 0.5% | ||||||
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation (Election of 2008), 0%, 2031 | $ | 525,000 | $ | 169,306 | ||
Los Angeles, CA, Unified School District, D, 5%, 2034 | 180,000 | 183,834 | ||||
Merced, CA, Union High School District, Capital Appreciation, A, ASSD GTY, 0%, 2030 | 320,000 | 93,181 | ||||
Royse City, TX, Independent School District, School Building, Capital Appreciation, PSF, 0%, 2027 | 955,000 | 410,239 | ||||
Royse City, TX, Independent School District, School Building, Capital Appreciation, PSF, 0%, 2029 | 965,000 | 369,113 | ||||
$ | 1,225,673 | |||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - 43.9% | ||||||
Alexander City, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority Medical Facilities Rev., A (Russell Hospital Corp.), 5.75%, 2036 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 541,986 |
8
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (West Penn Allegheny Health), 9.25%, 2010 (c) | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,132,579 | ||
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (West Penn Allegheny Health), A, 5%, 2028 | 1,905,000 | 1,617,935 | ||||
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (West Penn Allegheny Health), A, 5.375%, 2040 | 1,055,000 | 845,593 | ||||
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (West Penn Allegheny Health), B, 9.25%, 2010 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,066,290 | ||||
Athens County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (OBleness Memorial Hospital), A, 7.125%, 2033 | 1,500,000 | 1,330,155 | ||||
Birmingham, AL, Baptist Medical Center, Special Care Facilities Rev. (Baptist Health Systems, Inc.), A, 5%, 2030 | 2,260,000 | 1,966,357 | ||||
Brookhaven, NY, Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Memorial Hospital Medical Center, Inc.), A, ETM, 7.75%, 2010 (c) | 160,000 | 165,862 | ||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (St. Joseph Health System), A, 5.75%, 2039 | 650,000 | 680,069 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Childrens Hospital), 5%, 2047 | 550,000 | 435,985 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (St. Joseph Health System), FGIC, 5.75%, 2047 | 670,000 | 681,055 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Valleycare Health Systems), A, 5%, 2022 | 205,000 | 192,323 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Valleycare Health Systems), A, 5.125%, 2031 | 100,000 | 88,372 | ||||
California Valley Health Systems, COP, 6.875%, 2023 (d) | 595,000 | 297,500 | ||||
Chautauqua County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (Womens Christian Assn.), A, 6.35%, 2017 | 115,000 | 115,444 | ||||
Chautauqua County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (Womens Christian Assn.), A, 6.4%, 2029 | 955,000 | 885,877 | ||||
Chemung County, NY, Civic Facilities Rev. (St. Josephs Hospital-Elmira), A, 6%, 2013 |
325,000 | 250,838 | ||||
Chemung County, NY, Civic Facilities Rev. (St. Josephs Hospital-Elmira), B, 6.35%, 2013 |
105,000 | 81,025 | ||||
Citrus County, FL, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (Citrus Memorial Hospital), 6.25%, 2023 | 825,000 | 829,018 | ||||
Clinton County, MO, Industrial Development Agency, Health Facilities Rev. (Cameron Regional Medical Center), 5%, 2032 | 275,000 | 209,228 | ||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Parkview Medical Center), 6.6%, 2011 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,076,400 | ||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Portercare Adventist Health Systems), 6.625%, 2011 (c) | 675,000 | 741,143 | ||||
Crittenden County, AR, Hospital Rev., 7%, 2010 (c) | 1,030,000 | 1,050,260 |
9
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
Cullman County, AL, Health Care Authority (Cullman Regional Medical Center), A, 6.75%, 2029 | $ | 865,000 | $ | 888,407 | ||
Cuyahoga County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Canton, Inc.), 7.5%, 2030 | 1,330,000 | 1,346,106 | ||||
Escambia County, FL, Health Facilities Authority (Baptist Hospital, Inc.), A, 6%, 2036 | 615,000 | 613,321 | ||||
Fruita, CO, Rev. (Family Health West Project), 7%, 2018 | 255,000 | 267,890 | ||||
Fruita, CO, Rev. (Family Health West Project), 8%, 2043 | 1,310,000 | 1,407,176 | ||||
Garden City, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Garden City Hospital), A, 4.875%, 2027 | 1,275,000 | 937,788 | ||||
Gaylord, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Otsego Memorial Hospital), 6.2%, 2025 | 250,000 | 229,680 | ||||
Gaylord, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Otsego Memorial Hospital), 6.5%, 2031 | 295,000 | 266,220 | ||||
Genesee County, NY, Industrial Development Agency Civic Facility Rev. (United Memorial Medical Center), 5%, 2027 | 170,000 | 144,937 | ||||
Glendale, AZ, Industrial Development Authority (John C. Lincoln Health), 5%, 2042 | 755,000 | 671,021 | ||||
Grand Forks, ND, Health Care Authority Rev. (Altru Health Systems Obligated Group), 7.125%, 2010 (c) | 755,000 | 776,397 | ||||
Gulfport, MS, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Memorial Hospital), 5.75%, 2031 | 725,000 | 729,684 | ||||
Harris County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Hospital Rev. (Memorial Hermann Healthcare Systems), B, 7.25%, 2035 | 610,000 | 691,514 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Kewanee Hospital), 5.1%, 2031 | 390,000 | 308,950 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Provena Health), A, 7.75%, 2034 | 945,000 | 1,088,867 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers), 6.875%, 2038 | 940,000 | 980,768 | ||||
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Hospital Rev. (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana), A, 6.375%, 2011 (c) | 3,025,000 | 3,267,121 | ||||
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Hospital Rev. (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana), A, 6.375%, 2031 | 965,000 | 982,457 | ||||
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Hospital Rev. (Riverview Hospital), 6.125%, 2031 | 1,000,000 | 1,004,680 | ||||
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Clarian Health), A, 5%, 2039 | 1,000,000 | 928,080 | ||||
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana), 5.5%, 2037 | 1,990,000 | 1,935,733 | ||||
Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Mountain States Health Alliance), 6%, 2038 | 365,000 | 369,672 | ||||
Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Mountain States Health Alliance), A, 5.5%, 2036 | 660,000 | 632,603 |
10
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
Joplin, MO, Industrial Development Authority Health Facilities Rev. (Freeman Health Systems), 5.5%, 2029 | $ | 440,000 | $ | 425,467 | ||
Joplin, MO, Industrial Development Authority Health Facilities Rev. (Freeman Health Systems), 5.75%, 2035 | 475,000 | 467,557 | ||||
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority (Norton Healthcare), A, 6.5%, 2020 | 3,035,000 | 3,098,067 | ||||
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Owensboro Medical Health System), A, 6.375%, 2040 | 1,095,000 | 1,123,142 | ||||
Knox County, TN, Health, Educational, Hospital & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Baptist Health Systems), 6.5%, 2031 | 1,725,000 | 1,817,512 | ||||
Lauderdale County & Florence, AL, Health Care Authority Rev. (Coffee Health Group), NATL, 5.625%, 2021 | 3,000,000 | 2,775,750 | ||||
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Lake Charles Memorial Hospital), 6.375%, 2034 | 1,525,000 | 1,429,062 | ||||
Lufkin, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Memorial Health System), 5.5%, 2032 | 110,000 | 103,099 | ||||
Lufkin, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Memorial Health System), 5.5%, 2037 | 110,000 | 101,606 | ||||
Macomb County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Mount Clemens General Hospital), 5.875%, 2013 (c) | 435,000 | 502,099 | ||||
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Medstar Health), 5.5%, 2033 | 380,000 | 387,057 | ||||
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Mercy Medical Center), A, 5.5%, 2042 | 1,070,000 | 1,015,912 | ||||
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Washington County Hospital), 6%, 2043 | 285,000 | 284,567 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Berkshire Health Systems), E, 6.25%, 2031 | 1,900,000 | 1,931,103 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Caritas Christi), A, 5.7%, 2015 | 425,000 | 428,243 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Jordan Hospital), D, 5.25%, 2018 | 1,400,000 | 1,332,268 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Quincy Medical Center), A, 6.5%, 2038 | 640,000 | 560,998 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Saints Memorial Medical Center), A, 6%, 2023 | 270,000 | 233,639 | ||||
Miami Beach, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Mount Sinai Medical Center), 6.75%, 2029 | 810,000 | 802,184 | ||||
Miami Beach, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Mount Sinai Medical Center), A, 6.7%, 2019 | 995,000 | 1,008,303 | ||||
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Henry Ford Health System), 5.75%, 2039 | 2,000,000 | 1,977,540 |
11
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
Monroe County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.), 5.5%, 2035 | $ | 1,020,000 | $ | 873,355 | ||
Montgomery, AL, Medical Clinic Board Health Care Facility Rev. (Jackson Hospital & Clinic), 5.25%, 2031 | 225,000 | 208,850 | ||||
Montgomery, AL, Medical Clinic Board Health Care Facility Rev. (Jackson Hospital & Clinic), 5.25%, 2036 | 1,135,000 | 1,041,930 | ||||
Mount Lebanon, PA, Hospital Authority Rev. (St. Clair Memorial Hospital), 5.625%, 2032 | 435,000 | 440,659 | ||||
Nassau County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (North Shore Health System), 5.625%, 2010 | 135,000 | 137,696 | ||||
Nassau County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (North Shore Health System), 5.875%, 2011 | 175,000 | 178,885 | ||||
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority Rev. (Elliot Hospital Obligated Group), A, 6%, 2027 | 1,110,000 | 1,133,110 | ||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Catholic Medical Center), A, 6.125%, 2012 (c) | 880,000 | 986,559 | ||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Catholic Medical Center), A, 6.125%, 2032 | 120,000 | 120,796 | ||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Covenant Health System), 6.5%, 2012 (c) | 440,000 | 482,803 | ||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Covenant Health System), 6.5%, 2017 | 205,000 | 214,969 | ||||
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (St. Peters University Hospital), 5.75%, 2037 | 1,010,000 | 1,015,787 | ||||
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (St. Peters University Hospital), A, 6.875%, 2030 | 3,000,000 | 3,005,280 | ||||
New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council, Hospital Rev. (Rehoboth McKinley Christian Hospital), A, 5%, 2017 | 100,000 | 92,991 | ||||
New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council, Hospital Rev. (Rehoboth McKinley Christian Hospital), A, 5.25%, 2026 | 440,000 | 356,651 | ||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (NYU Hospital Center), B, 5.25%, 2024 | 430,000 | 440,789 | ||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (NYU Hospital Center), B, 5.625%, 2037 | 560,000 | 571,346 | ||||
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (Staten Island University Hospital), A, 6.375%, 2031 | 465,000 | 465,921 | ||||
Norman, OK, Regional Hospital Authority Rev., 5%, 2027 | 300,000 | 251,952 | ||||
Norman, OK, Regional Hospital Authority Rev., 5.375%, 2029 | 175,000 | 150,229 | ||||
Norman, OK, Regional Hospital Authority Rev., 5.375%, 2036 | 1,395,000 | 1,129,643 | ||||
Ohio County, WV, County Commission Health System Rev. (Ohio Valley Medical Center), 5.75%, 2013 | 455,000 | 414,318 | ||||
Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission Rev. (University Hospital Health System), 6.75%, 2039 | 1,610,000 | 1,718,820 |
12
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Rev. (Comanche County Hospital), B, 6.6%, 2031 | $ | 1,665,000 | $ | 1,710,871 | ||
Olympia, WA, Healthcare Facilities Authority Rev. (Catholic Health Initiatives), D, 6.375%, 2036 | 1,500,000 | 1,658,475 | ||||
Palomar Pomerado Health Care District, CA, COP, 6.75%, 2039 | 1,975,000 | 2,046,298 | ||||
Philadelphia, PA, Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Temple University Health System), A, 6.625%, 2023 | 765,000 | 765,122 | ||||
Philadelphia, PA, Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Temple University Health System), A, 5.5%, 2030 | 590,000 | 524,787 | ||||
Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp., Hospital Financing (Lifespan Obligated Group), 6.375%, 2012 (c) | 1,560,000 | 1,711,211 | ||||
Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp., Hospital Financing (Lifespan Obligated Group), 6.5%, 2012 (c) | 505,000 | 567,388 | ||||
Royal Oak, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (William Beaumont Hospital), 8.25%, 2039 | 1,595,000 | 1,898,672 | ||||
Salida, CO, Hospital District Rev., 5.25%, 2036 | 1,675,000 | 1,346,281 | ||||
Salt Lake City, UT, Hospital Authority Rev. (Intermountain Health Care), ETM, AMBAC, 12.73%, 2020 (c)(p) | 600,000 | 601,296 | ||||
Shelby County, TN, Educational & Hospital Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Methodist Healthcare), 6.375%, 2012 (c) | 625,000 | 701,913 | ||||
Shelby County, TN, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Methodist Healthcare), 6.25%, 2012 (c) | 185,000 | 207,237 | ||||
Shelby County, TN, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Methodist Healthcare), 6.25%, 2012 (c) | 315,000 | 352,863 | ||||
Shelby County, TN, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Methodist Healthcare), 6.375%, 2012 (c) | 375,000 | 421,148 | ||||
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 5.375%, 2022 | 1,455,000 | 1,447,710 | ||||
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 6%, 2023 | 205,000 | 209,604 | ||||
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 5.75%, 2032 | 165,000 | 161,123 | ||||
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority (Bon Secours - St. Francis Medical Center, Inc.), 5.625%, 2030 | 560,000 | 560,706 | ||||
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Palmetto Health Alliance), 6.25%, 2031 | 835,000 | 845,613 | ||||
South Dakota Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Prairie Lakes Health Care System), 5.625%, 2032 | 670,000 | 668,707 | ||||
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District Rev. (South Lake Hospital), A, 6%, 2029 | 255,000 | 260,804 | ||||
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District Rev. (South Lake Hospital), A, 6.25%, 2039 | 385,000 | 393,936 |
13
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
Southwestern, IL, Development Authority Rev. (Anderson Hospital), 5.5%, 2020 | $ | 60,000 | $ | 59,808 | ||
Southwestern, IL, Development Authority Rev. (Anderson Hospital), 5.625%, 2029 | 870,000 | 842,578 | ||||
St. Paul, MN, Housing & Redevelopment Authority Healthcare Facilities Rev. (Healthpartners Obligated Group), 5.25%, 2036 | 1,085,000 | 1,038,996 | ||||
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Wellmont Health Systems Project), C, 5.25%, 2036 | 1,115,000 | 995,483 | ||||
Sumner County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Sumner Regional Health Systems, Inc.), A, 5.5%, 2046 | 735,000 | 479,066 | ||||
Tallahassee, FL, Health Facilities Rev. (Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Inc.), 6.25%, 2020 | 3,085,000 | 3,112,487 | ||||
Texas Metro Health Facilities Development Corp., Metro Health Facilities Development Rev. (Wilson N. Jones Memorial Hospital), 7.2%, 2021 | 700,000 | 730,268 | ||||
Texas Metro Health Facilities Development Corp., Metro Health Facilities Development Rev. (Wilson N. Jones Memorial Hospital), 7.25%, 2031 | 1,000,000 | 1,043,570 | ||||
Tom Green County, TX, Health Facilities Rev. (Shannon Health System), 6.75%, 2021 | 1,250,000 | 1,288,075 | ||||
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. (East Texas Medical Center), A, 5.25%, 2032 | 985,000 | 916,237 | ||||
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. (East Texas Medical Center), A, 5.375%, 2037 | 810,000 | 751,453 | ||||
Upper Illinois River Valley Development, Health Facilities Rev. (Morris Hospital), 6.625%, 2031 | 600,000 | 610,530 | ||||
Vigo County, IN, Hospital Authority Rev. (Union Hospital), 5.75%, 2042 | 220,000 | 187,900 | ||||
Vigo County, IN, Hospital Authority Rev. (Union Hospital), 5.8%, 2047 | 1,035,000 | 880,588 | ||||
Wapello County, IA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Ottumwa Regional Health Center), 6.375%, 2012 (c) | 1,500,000 | 1,683,495 | ||||
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Virginia Mason Medical Center), A, 6.25%, 2042 | 1,400,000 | 1,435,154 | ||||
Weirton, WV, Municipal Hospital Building, Commission Rev. (Weirton Hospital Medical Center), 6.375%, 2031 | 1,115,000 | 1,072,663 | ||||
Weslaco, TX, Health Facilities Rev. (Knapp Medical Center), 6.25%, 2012 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,089,670 | ||||
West Contra Costa, CA, Healthcare District, AMBAC, 5.5%, 2029 | 195,000 | 199,557 | ||||
West Plains, MO, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Ozarks Medical Center), 6.75%, 2024 | 170,000 | 169,839 | ||||
West Shore, PA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Holy Spirit Hospital), 6.2%, 2026 | 1,250,000 | 1,258,063 |
14
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Thomas Health System), 6.5%, 2038 | $ | 905,000 | $ | 860,103 | ||
Wichita, KS, Hospital Authority Rev. (Via Christi Health System), 6.25%, 2020 | 1,500,000 | 1,569,780 | ||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Aurora Health Care, Inc.), 6.875%, 2030 | 1,000,000 | 1,038,240 | ||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Services), 5.25%, 2034 | 1,135,000 | 1,005,655 | ||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Services), A, 5.25%, 2025 | 745,000 | 705,224 | ||||
Yonkers, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (St. Johns Riverside Hospital), 6.8%, 2016 | 510,000 | 517,166 | ||||
Yonkers, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (St. Josephs Hospital), C, 6.2%, 2020 | 750,000 | 427,815 | ||||
$ | 120,020,108 | |||||
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - 15.7% | ||||||
ABAG Finance Authority for Non-Profit Corps., CA, Rev. (Casa de las Campanas), 6%, 2037 | $ | 175,000 | $ | 175,662 | ||
Abilene, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Sears Methodist Retirement Systems, Inc.), A, 7%, 2033 | 345,000 | 302,443 | ||||
Arizona Health Facilities Authority Rev. (The Terraces Project), 7.75%, 2013 (c) | 750,000 | 905,174 | ||||
Bell County, TX, Health Facility Development Corp. (Advanced Living Technologies, Inc.), 8%, 2036 | 3,490,000 | 2,830,424 | ||||
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Retirement Community Rev. (Anns Choice, Inc.), A, 6.125%, 2025 | 430,000 | 402,532 | ||||
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Retirement Community Rev. (Anns Choice, Inc.), A, 6.25%, 2035 | 290,000 | 262,085 | ||||
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lutheran Community Telford Center), 5.75%, 2027 | 170,000 | 146,433 | ||||
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lutheran Community Telford Center), 5.75%, 2037 | 225,000 | 180,720 | ||||
Cambria County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Beverly Enterprises, Inc.), ETM, 10%, 2012 (c) | 220,000 | 233,809 | ||||
Chartiers Valley, PA, Industrial & Commercial Development Authority (Asbury Health Center Project), 5.75%, 2022 | 150,000 | 136,232 | ||||
Chester County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (RHA Nursing Home), 8.5%, 2032 | 560,000 | 503,048 | ||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (American Baptist Homes), A, 5.9%, 2037 | 755,000 | 618,488 | ||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Christian Living Communities Project), A, 5.75%, 2037 | 395,000 | 339,917 |
15
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | ||||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), B, 6.125%, 2033 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,001,370 | ||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Evangelical Lutheran), 6.9%, 2010 (c) | 1,830,000 | 1,932,773 | ||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Evangelical Lutheran), 6.9%, 2025 | 1,170,000 | 1,203,064 | ||||
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries), 6.125%, 2029 | 1,360,000 | 1,353,132 | ||||
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Wesley), A, 7.25%, 2013 (c) | 720,000 | 837,374 | ||||
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority, Retirement Community Rev. (Wesley), A, 7.25%, 2013 (c) | 280,000 | 325,646 | ||||
Franklin County, OH, Healthcare Facilities Rev. (Ohio Presbyterian), 7.125%, 2011 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,081,520 | ||||
Fulton County, GA, Residential Care Facilities (Lenbrook Project), A, 5.125%, 2042 | 955,000 | 605,355 | ||||
Fulton County, GA, Residential Care Facilities, Elderly Authority Rev. (Canterbury Court), A, 6.125%, 2034 | 330,000 | 293,264 | ||||
Georgia Medical Center Hospital Authority Rev. (Spring Harbor Green Island Project), 5.25%, 2027 | 1,000,000 | 849,740 | ||||
Georgia Medical Center Hospital Authority Rev. (Spring Harbor Green Island Project), 5.25%, 2037 | 215,000 | 170,179 | ||||
Hamden, CT, Facility Rev. (Whitney Center Project), A, 7.625%, 2030 | 130,000 | 134,849 | ||||
Hamden, CT, Facility Rev. (Whitney Center Project), A, 7.75%, 2043 | 630,000 | 653,581 | ||||
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Rev. (15 Craigside Project), A, 8.75%, 2029 | 105,000 | 117,618 | ||||
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Rev. (15 Craigside Project), A, 9%, 2044 | 275,000 | 306,686 | ||||
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Rev. (Kahala Nui Senior Living Community), 8%, 2033 | 500,000 | 535,685 | ||||
Huntsville-Redstone Village, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority (Redstone Village Project), 5.5%, 2028 | 590,000 | 479,446 | ||||
Huntsville-Redstone Village, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority (Redstone Village Project), 5.5%, 2043 | 440,000 | 320,474 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Evangelical Retirement Homes of Greater Chicago, Inc.), 7.25%, 2045 | 500,000 | 490,595 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Franciscan Communities, Inc.), A, 5.5%, 2037 | 800,000 | 564,152 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Friendship Village), A, 5.375%, 2025 | 1,270,000 | 1,121,156 |
16
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Landing at Plymouth Place), A, 6%, 2037 | $ | 490,000 | $ | 397,248 | ||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Montgomery Place), A, 5.75%, 2038 | 520,000 | 423,852 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (The Clare at Water Tower), A, 6%, 2025 (a) | 490,000 | 199,592 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev., Bond Anticipation Notes (Tallgrass), 13%, 2012 | 210,000 | 211,651 | ||||
Iowa Finance Authority, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Care Initiatives), 9.25%, 2011 (c) | 1,075,000 | 1,197,883 | ||||
Iowa Finance Authority, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Care Initiatives), A, 5.5%, 2025 | 800,000 | 652,720 | ||||
Iowa Finance Authority, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Care Initiatives), B, 5.75%, 2018 | 825,000 | 757,325 | ||||
Iowa Finance Authority, Senior Housing Rev. (Bethany Life Communities), A, 5.55%, 2041 | 230,000 | 189,557 | ||||
James City County, VA, Economic Development (WindsorMeade Project), A, 5.4%, 2027 | 585,000 | 353,059 | ||||
James City County, VA, Economic Development (WindsorMeade Project), A, 5.5%, 2037 | 785,000 | 465,120 | ||||
Lenexa, KS, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Lakeview Village, Inc.), 5.375%, 2027 | 315,000 | 272,692 | ||||
Lenexa, KS, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Lakeview Village, Inc.), 7.125%, 2029 | 345,000 | 349,364 | ||||
Lenexa, KS, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Lakeview Village, Inc.), C, 6.875%, 2012 (c) | 500,000 | 564,260 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Adventcare), A, 6.75%, 2037 | 1,270,000 | 1,089,571 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Linden Ponds, Inc.), A, 5.5%, 2027 | 340,000 | 266,499 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Linden Ponds, Inc.), A, 5.75%, 2035 | 85,000 | 64,690 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (The Groves in Lincoln), A, 7.75%, 2039 | 150,000 | 154,409 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (The Groves in Lincoln), A, 7.875%, 2044 | 225,000 | 232,702 | ||||
Millbrae, CA, Residential Facilities Rev. (Magnolia of Millbrae), A, 7.375%, 2027 | 1,745,000 | 1,743,883 | ||||
Montgomery County, PA, Higher Education & Health Authority Rev. (AHF/Montgomery), 6.875%, 2036 | 1,180,000 | 1,004,121 | ||||
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Whitemarsh Continuing Care), 6.125%, 2028 | 250,000 | 201,310 |
17
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | ||||||
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Whitemarsh Continuing Care), 6.25%, 2035 | $ | 510,000 | $ | 390,436 | ||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Lions Gate), A, 5.875%, 2037 | 530,000 | 440,711 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Seabrook Village, Inc.), 5.25%, 2036 | 715,000 | 584,906 | ||||
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (Cherry Hill), 8%, 2027 | 1,000,000 | 760,560 | ||||
Norfolk, VA, Redevelopment & Housing Authority Rev. (Fort Norfolk Retirement Community), A, 6%, 2025 | 215,000 | 199,929 | ||||
Norfolk, VA, Redevelopment & Housing Authority Rev. (Fort Norfolk Retirement Community), A, 6.125%, 2035 | 330,000 | 290,334 | ||||
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Orlando Lutheran Tower), 5.5%, 2038 | 320,000 | 259,616 | ||||
Sarasota County, FL, Health Facility Authority Rev. (Sarasota Manatee), 5.75%, 2037 | 490,000 | 395,876 | ||||
Sarasota County, FL, Health Facility Authority Rev. (Sarasota Manatee), 5.75%, 2045 | 105,000 | 82,647 | ||||
Scott County, IA, Rev. (Ridgecrest Village), 5.25%, 2027 | 245,000 | 198,472 | ||||
Shelby County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Germantown Village), A, 7.25%, 2034 | 820,000 | 793,514 | ||||
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev. (Lutheran Homes of South Carolina), 5.5%, 2028 | 130,000 | 115,822 | ||||
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev. (Lutheran Homes of South Carolina), 5.625%, 2042 | 150,000 | 125,279 | ||||
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev. (Woodlands at Furman), A, 6%, 2027 | 515,000 | 395,257 | ||||
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority Rev. (Woodlands at Furman), A, 6%, 2042 | 470,000 | 326,946 | ||||
Sterling, IL (Hoosier Care), 7.125%, 2034 | 670,000 | 572,555 | ||||
Suffolk County, NY, Industrial Development Agency (Medford Hamlet Assisted Living), 6.375%, 2039 | 490,000 | 383,846 | ||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Air Force Village), 6.125%, 2029 | 115,000 | 114,543 | ||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Air Force Village), 6.375%, 2044 | 780,000 | 763,480 | ||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Stayton Museum Way), 8.25%, 2044 | 1,500,000 | 1,483,035 | ||||
Travis County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Westminster Manor Health), 7%, 2030 | 245,000 | 246,441 | ||||
Travis County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Westminster Manor Health), 7.125%, 2040 | 370,000 | 372,301 |
18
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | ||||||
Travis County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Querencia Barton Creek), 5.5%, 2025 | $ | 460,000 | $ | 396,847 | ||
Ulster County, NY, Industrial Development Agency (Woodland Pond), A, 6%, 2037 | 1,075,000 | 849,358 | ||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (All Saints Assisted Living Project), 6%, 2037 | 340,000 | 298,772 | ||||
$ | 43,047,617 | |||||
Human Services - 2.6% | ||||||
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority Community Provider Rev. (Boys & Girls Home of Alaska, Inc.), 5.875%, 2027 | $ | 210,000 | $ | 157,827 | ||
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority Community Provider Rev. (Boys & Girls Home of Alaska, Inc.), 6%, 2036 | 325,000 | 230,294 | ||||
Greenville County, SC, Hospital Rev. (Chestnut Hill), A, 8%, 2015 | 1,480,000 | 1,485,091 | ||||
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (CDF Healthcare), A, 7%, 2036 | 500,000 | 459,800 | ||||
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (CDF Healthcare), C, 7%, 2036 | 375,000 | 344,850 | ||||
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (Westside Rehab Center Project), A, 6.85%, 2036 | 1,100,000 | 990,429 | ||||
Louisiana Local Government, Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (Westside Rehab Center Project), B, 6.5%, 2013 | 115,000 | 115,267 | ||||
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Rev. (A Very Special Place), A, 5.75%, 2029 | 1,000,000 | 828,250 | ||||
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Rev. (Special Needs Facilities), 6.5%, 2017 | 1,030,000 | 969,724 | ||||
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (GF/Orlando Healthcare Facilities), 8.75%, 2011 | 195,000 | 196,486 | ||||
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (GF/Orlando Healthcare Facilities), 9%, 2031 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,060 | ||||
Osceola County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Community Provider), 7.75%, 2017 | 243,000 | 242,949 | ||||
$ | 7,021,027 | |||||
Industrial Revenue - Airlines - 8.0% | ||||||
Alliance Airport Authority, Inc., TX (American Airlines, Inc.), 5.25%, 2029 | $ | 660,000 | $ | 460,930 | ||
Chicago, IL, OHare International Airport Special Facilities Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), 5.5%, 2030 | 190,000 | 141,363 | ||||
Clayton County, GA, Development Authority Special Facilities Rev. (Delta Airlines, Inc.), A, 8.75%, 2029 | 385,000 | 411,264 |
19
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Industrial Revenue - Airlines - continued | ||||||
Clayton County, GA, Development Authority Special Facilities Rev. (Delta Airlines, Inc.), B, 9%, 2035 | $ | 285,000 | $ | 297,144 | ||
Dallas Fort Worth, TX, International Airport Facility Improvement Corp. (American Airlines, Inc.), 5.5%, 2030 | 1,425,000 | 1,018,761 | ||||
Denver, CO, City & County Airport Rev. (United Airlines), 5.25%, 2032 | 3,735,000 | 2,944,413 | ||||
Denver, CO, City & County Airport Rev. (United Airlines), 5.75%, 2032 | 925,000 | 800,717 | ||||
Houston, TX, Airport Systems Rev., Special Facilities (Continental, Inc.), E, 6.75%, 2029 | 1,810,000 | 1,813,005 | ||||
Los Angeles, CA, Regional Airport Lease Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), C, 7.5%, 2024 | 850,000 | 856,375 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Rev. (Continental Airlines, Inc.), 6.25%, 2029 | 1,300,000 | 1,220,206 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Rev. (Continental Airlines, Inc.), 7.2%, 2030 | 1,595,000 | 1,601,779 | ||||
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agencies Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), 7.5%, 2016 | 725,000 | 736,020 | ||||
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agencies Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), 7.625%, 2025 | 6,625,000 | 6,739,083 | ||||
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agencies Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), 7.75%, 2031 | 2,540,000 | 2,579,599 | ||||
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agencies Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), A, 8%, 2012 | 265,000 | 272,619 | ||||
$ | 21,893,278 | |||||
Industrial Revenue - Chemicals - 1.1% | ||||||
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District (Dow Chemical Co.), B-2, 4.95%, 2033 | $ | 75,000 | $ | 72,205 | ||
Louisiana Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority Rev. (Westlake Chemical), 6.75%, 2032 | 1,000,000 | 1,027,730 | ||||
Red River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (Celanese Project) B, 6.7%, 2030 | 1,920,000 | 1,892,659 | ||||
$ | 2,992,594 | |||||
Industrial Revenue - Environmental Services - 2.6% | ||||||
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Browning Ferris, Inc.), A, 5.8%, 2016 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,002,700 | ||
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), A, 5%, 2022 | 695,000 | 689,502 | ||||
Director of the State of Nevada Department of Business & Industry Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), 5.625%, 2026 (b) | 750,000 | 780,285 | ||||
Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority (Waste Management, Inc.), 5.2%, 2028 | 440,000 | 438,469 |
20
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Industrial Revenue - Environmental Services - continued | ||||||
Henrico County, VA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Browning Ferris, Inc.), 5.45%, 2014 | $ | 1,750,000 | $ | 1,824,515 | ||
Mission, TX, Economic Development Corp., Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Allied Waste N.A., Inc.), A, 5.2%, 2018 | 440,000 | 441,716 | ||||
New Morgan, PA, Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (New Morgan Landfill Co., Inc./Browning Ferris, Inc.), 6.5%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 1,003,210 | ||||
Yavapai County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), 4.9%, 2028 | 885,000 | 844,432 | ||||
$ | 7,024,829 | |||||
Industrial Revenue - Metals - 0.2% | ||||||
Jacksonville, FL, Economic Development Commission, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Gerdau Ameristeel U.S., Inc.), 5.3%, 2037 | $ | 645,000 | $ | 499,385 | ||
Industrial Revenue - Other - 5.2% | ||||||
Aztalan, WI, Exempt Facility Rev. (Renew Energy LLC Project), 7.5%, 2018 (d) | $ | 835,000 | $ | 131,762 | ||
Baker, FL, Correctional Development Corp. (Baker County Detention Center), 7.5%, 2030 (a) | 440,000 | 364,121 | ||||
California Statewide Communities, Development Authority Facilities (Microgy Holdings Project), 9%, 2038 (a) | 13,387 | 1,339 | ||||
Gulf Coast, TX, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Microgy Holdings LLC Project), 7%, 2036 (a) | 238,610 | 23,861 | ||||
Gulf Coast, TX, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Valero Energy Corp.), 5.6%, 2031 | 1,750,000 | 1,618,102 | ||||
Gulf Coast, TX, Waste Disposal Rev. (Valero Energy Corp.), 6.65%, 2032 | 1,000,000 | 1,007,000 | ||||
Houston, TX, Industrial Development Corp. (United Parcel Service, Inc.), 6%, 2023 | 90,000 | 86,116 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (GMT Realty LLC), B, 6.875%, 2037 | 430,000 | 351,684 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (GMT Realty LLC), C, 6.5%, 2015 | 700,000 | 695,779 | ||||
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Rev., Liberty Bonds (IAC/InterActiveCorp), 5%, 2035 | 620,000 | 542,655 | ||||
Park Creek Metropolitan District, CO, Rev. (Custodial Receipts), CR-1, 7.875%, 2032 (b)(n) | 1,270,000 | 1,297,686 | ||||
Park Creek Metropolitan District, CO, Rev. (Custodial Receipts), CR-2, 7.875%, 2032 (b)(n) | 580,000 | 592,644 | ||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Finance Authority Facilities Rev. (Amtrak), A, 6.25%, 2031 | 2,000,000 | 2,030,880 |
21
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Industrial Revenue - Other - continued | ||||||
Philadelphia, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Host Marriott LP), 7.75%, 2017 | $ | 3,255,000 | $ | 3,268,378 | ||
State of Indiana Finance Authority, Environmental Rev. (U.S. Steel Corp.), 6%, 2026 | 745,000 | 745,000 | ||||
Texas Midwest Public Facilities Corp. Rev. (Secure Treatment Facilities Project), 9%, 2030 | 395,000 | 412,360 | ||||
Tooele County, UT, Hazardous Waste Treatment Rev. (Union Pacific Corp.), 5.7%, 2026 | 1,120,000 | 1,129,352 | ||||
$ | 14,298,719 | |||||
Industrial Revenue - Paper - 4.4% | ||||||
Bedford County, VA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Nekoosa Packaging), A, 6.55%, 2025 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,003,620 | ||
Butler, AL, Industrial Development Board, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Georgia Pacific Corp.), 5.75%, 2028 | 155,000 | 143,261 | ||||
Cass County, TX, Industrial Development Corp. (International Paper Co.), A, 4.625%, 2027 | 2,150,000 | 1,762,828 | ||||
Delta County, MI, Economic Development Corp., Environmental Improvement Rev. (Mead Westvaco Escanaba), B, 6.45%, 2012 (c) | 500,000 | 549,279 | ||||
Effingham County, GA, Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Fort James), 5.625%, 2018 | 850,000 | 824,278 | ||||
Effingham County, GA, Industrial Development Authority, Pollution Control (Georgia Pacific Corp. Project), 6.5%, 2031 | 500,000 | 505,745 | ||||
Escambia County, FL, Environmental Improvement Rev. (International Paper Co.), A, 4.75%, 2030 | 525,000 | 426,447 | ||||
Hodge, LA, Utilities Rev. (Stone Container Corp.), 7.45%, 2024 (d) | 3,590,000 | 4,128,500 | ||||
Lowndes County, MS, Solid Waste Disposal & Pollution Control Rev. (Weyerhaeuser Co.), 6.8%, 2022 | 2,000,000 | 2,199,060 | ||||
Rockdale County, GA, Development Authority Project Rev. (Visy Paper Project), A, 6.125%, 2034 | 640,000 | 592,288 | ||||
West Point, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Chesapeake Corp.), 6.25%, 2019 (d) | 1,870,000 | 19,261 | ||||
West Point, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Chesapeake Corp.), A, 6.375%, 2019 (d) | 700,000 | 7,210 | ||||
$ | 12,161,777 | |||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Entertainment & Tourism - 0.7% | ||||||
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 6%, 2030 | $ | 230,000 | $ | 235,457 | ||
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 6.25%, 2040 | 150,000 | 153,990 | ||||
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 6.375%, 2043 | 225,000 | 230,074 |
22
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Entertainment & Tourism - continued | ||||||
Mississippi Development Bank, Special Obligation (Diamond Lakes Utilities), 6.25%, 2017 | $ | 700,000 | $ | 656,957 | ||
New York Liberty Development Corp. Rev. (National Sports Museum), A, 6.125%, 2019 (d) | 369,599 | 1,109 | ||||
Seminole Tribe, FL, Special Obligation Rev., A, 5.25%, 2027 (n) | 515,000 | 465,864 | ||||
Seneca Nation Indians, NY, Capital Improvements Authority, Special Obligation, 5%, 2023 (n) | 275,000 | 236,602 | ||||
$ | 1,980,053 | |||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Other - 3.3% | ||||||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), A, 6.7%, 2011 (c) | $ | 600,000 | $ | 625,002 | ||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), A, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2017 | 215,000 | 209,916 | ||||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), A, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2024 | 220,000 | 201,485 | ||||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), A, SYNCORA, 5%, 2034 | 110,000 | 87,622 | ||||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), B, 5.75%, 2034 | 775,000 | 645,831 | ||||
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH, Port Authority Rev. (Cleveland City), B, 4.5%, 2030 | 550,000 | 405,025 | ||||
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH, Port Authority Rev. (Fairmount), B, LOC, 5.125%, 2025 | 160,000 | 135,413 | ||||
Columbus, OH, Franklin County Finance Authority Development Rev., 6%, 2035 | 795,000 | 793,959 | ||||
Dayton Montgomery County, OH, Port Authority Rev. (Parking Garage), 6.125%, 2024 | 1,130,000 | 1,108,643 | ||||
Hardeman County, TN, Correctional Facilities Rev., 7.75%, 2017 | 1,680,000 | 1,680,991 | ||||
Madison County, FL, Rev. (Twin Oaks Project), A, 6%, 2025 | 520,000 | 415,943 | ||||
New Orleans, LA, Aviation Board Gulf Opportunity Zone CFC Rev. (Consolidated Rental Car), A, 6.25%, 2030 | 455,000 | 472,499 | ||||
Riversouth, OH, Authority Rev. (Lazarus Building), A, 5.75%, 2027 | 1,125,000 | 985,028 | ||||
Southwestern Illinois Development Authority Rev., Solid Waste Disposal Rev., 5.9%, 2014 | 275,000 | 268,406 | ||||
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Seville Project), A, 5.1%, 2025 | 170,000 | 144,765 | ||||
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Twinsburg Township), D, 5.125%, 2025 | 155,000 | 132,356 | ||||
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Workforce Policy Board), F, 4.875%, 2025 | 915,000 | 756,870 |
23
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Other - continued | ||||||
Toledo-Lucas County, OH, Port Authority Development Rev. (Northwest Ohio Bond Fund), C, 5.125%, 2025 | $ | 90,000 | $ | 78,409 | ||
$ | 9,148,163 | |||||
Multi-Family Housing Revenue - 2.5% | ||||||
Bay County, FL, Housing Finance Authority, Multi-Family Rev. (Andrews Place II Apartments), AGM, 5%, 2035 | $ | 210,000 | $ | 207,902 | ||
Charter Mac Equity Issuer Trust, FHLMC, 6%, 2019 (n) | 2,000,000 | 2,060,320 | ||||
Indianapolis, IN, Multi-Family Rev. (Cambridge Station Apartments II), FNMA, 5.25%, 2039 (b) | 435,000 | 436,235 | ||||
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Berkshire Place), GNMA, 6%, 2023 | 500,000 | 509,525 | ||||
Mississippi Home Corp., Rev. (Kirkwood Apartments), 6.8%, 2037 (q) | 1,095,000 | 724,288 | ||||
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.4%, 2049 (z) | 1,000,000 | 655,180 | ||||
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 7.5%, 2049 (n) | 1,920,834 | 1,825,292 | ||||
North Charleston, SC, Housing Authority Rev. (Horizon Village), A, GNMA, 5.15%, 2048 | 445,000 | 434,115 | ||||
$ | 6,852,857 | |||||
Sales & Excise Tax Revenue - 0.2% | ||||||
Desloge, MO, Tax Increment Rev. (U.S. Highway 67 Street Redevelopment), 5.2%, 2020 | $ | 190,000 | $ | 179,548 | ||
Utah Transit Authority Sales Tax Rev., Capital Appreciation, A, NATL, 0%, 2028 | 950,000 | 349,999 | ||||
$ | 529,547 | |||||
Single Family Housing - Local - 0.8% | ||||||
Corpus Christi, TX, Housing Finance Authority Rev., Capital Appreciation, B, 0%, 2011 (a) | $ | 960,000 | $ | 66,816 | ||
Dallas, TX, Housing Finance Corp., Single Family Mortgage Rev., Capital Appreciation, NATL, 0%, 2016 | 1,290,000 | 668,388 | ||||
Jefferson Parish, LA, Single Family Mortgage Rev., GNMA, 6.3%, 2032 | 360,000 | 367,578 | ||||
Jefferson Parish, LA, Single Family Mortgage Rev., B-1, GNMA, 6.625%, 2023 | 145,000 | 153,229 | ||||
Nortex, TX, Housing Finance Corp., Single Family Mortgage Rev., B, 5.5%, 2038 | 35,000 | 28,470 | ||||
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., A, GNMA, 6.45%, 2029 | 185,000 | 190,544 | ||||
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., A, GNMA, 5.9%, 2035 | 180,000 | 182,630 | ||||
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., A, GNMA, 6.25%, 2035 | 85,000 | 89,820 |
24
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Single Family Housing - Local - continued | ||||||
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., A-1, GNMA, 5.75%, 2037 | $ | 80,000 | $ | 81,049 | ||
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., A-2, GNMA, 5.75%, 2037 | 295,000 | 301,071 | ||||
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, Single Family Housing Rev., A-5, GNMA, 5.9%, 2037 | 115,000 | 117,690 | ||||
$ | 2,247,285 | |||||
Single Family Housing - State - 0.9% | ||||||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., C-2, 5.9%, 2023 | $ | 115,000 | $ | 121,584 | ||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., C-2, FHA, 6.6%, 2032 | 110,000 | 118,274 | ||||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., C-3, FHA, 6.375%, 2033 | 45,000 | 46,472 | ||||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., D-2, 6.9%, 2029 | 195,000 | 205,863 | ||||
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), GNMA, 6.35%, 2032 | 145,000 | 145,537 | ||||
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), GNMA, 6.85%, 2032 | 85,000 | 87,712 | ||||
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority Single Family Mortgage Rev., 0%, 2015 | 1,375,000 | 867,116 | ||||
New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority Rev., B, 5.875%, 2030 | 25,000 | 25,285 | ||||
Texas Affordable Housing Corp. (Single Family Mortgage), B, GNMA, 5.25%, 2039 | 715,000 | 726,919 | ||||
$ | 2,344,762 | |||||
Solid Waste Revenue - 1.2% | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Rev. (Ogden Haverhill Associates), A, 6.7%, 2014 | $ | 360,000 | $ | 363,920 | ||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Rev. (Ogden Haverhill Associates), A, 5.6%, 2019 | 2,850,000 | 2,669,139 | ||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Sewer Sludge Disposal Rev. (Philadelphia Biosolids Facility), 6.25%, 2032 | 145,000 | 153,719 | ||||
$ | 3,186,778 | |||||
State & Agency - Other - 0.4% | ||||||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Mepsi Campus), A, 6.25%, 2024 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 193,720 | ||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Mepsi Campus), A, 6.5%, 2037 | 900,000 | 828,018 | ||||
$ | 1,021,738 | |||||
State & Local Appropriation - 0.1% | ||||||
Philadelphia, PA, Municipal Authority Rev., 6.5%, 2034 | $ | 260,000 | $ | 273,424 |
25
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Student Loan Revenue - 0.6% | ||||||
Access to Loans for Learning, CA, Student Loan Rev., 7.95%, 2030 | $ | 650,000 | $ | 637,124 | ||
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev., H, ASSD GTY, 6.35%, 2030 | 1,000,000 | 1,064,280 | ||||
$ | 1,701,404 | |||||
Tax - Other - 0.2% | ||||||
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev. (Diageo Project), A, 6.75%, 2037 | $ | 395,000 | $ | 432,983 | ||
Tax Assessment - 5.9% | ||||||
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev. (Master Infrastructure Projects), A, 5.35%, 2036 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 346,974 | ||
Arborwood Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment (Master Infrastructure Projects), B, 5.1%, 2014 | 210,000 | 156,479 | ||||
Atlanta, GA, Tax Allocation (Eastside Project), B, 5.6%, 2030 | 815,000 | 756,320 | ||||
Atlanta, GA, Tax Allocation (Princeton Lakes Project), 5.5%, 2031 | 470,000 | 405,944 | ||||
Baltimore, MD, Special Obligation, A, 7%, 2038 | 715,000 | 719,819 | ||||
Capital Region Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., A, 7%, 2039 | 460,000 | 434,502 | ||||
Concord Station Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5%, 2015 | 175,000 | 116,305 | ||||
Concorde Estates Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, B, 5%, 2011 (d) | 475,000 | 178,125 | ||||
Du Page County, IL, Special Service Area No. 31 Special Tax (Monarch Landing Project), 5.625%, 2036 | 305,000 | 229,009 | ||||
Durbin Crossing Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, B-1, 4.875%, 2010 | 235,000 | 203,987 | ||||
Enclave at Black Point Marina Community Development District, FL, B, 5.2%, 2014 | 215,000 | 136,514 | ||||
Fishhawk Community Development District, FL, 7.04%, 2014 | 190,000 | 183,023 | ||||
Grand Bay at Doral Community Development District, FL, A, 6%, 2039 | 170,000 | 85,369 | ||||
Grand Bay at Doral Community Development District, FL, B, 6%, 2017 | 995,000 | 641,656 | ||||
Heritage Harbour North Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 6.375%, 2038 | 560,000 | 452,099 | ||||
Homestead, FL, Community Development District, Special Assessment, A, 6%, 2037 | 660,000 | 410,659 | ||||
Homestead, FL, Community Development District, Special Assessment, B, 5.9%, 2013 | 310,000 | 194,922 | ||||
Katy, TX, Development Authority Rev., B, 6%, 2018 | 420,000 | 381,860 | ||||
Killarney Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, B, 5.125%, 2009 (d) | 170,000 | 102,000 |
26
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Tax Assessment - continued | ||||||
Lancaster County, SC, Assessment Rev. (Sun City Carolina Lakes), 5.45%, 2037 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 79,745 | ||
Legends Bay Community Development District, FL, A, 5.5%, 2014 | 420,000 | 280,757 | ||||
Legends Bay Community Development District, FL, A, 5.875%, 2038 | 355,000 | 239,093 | ||||
Magnolia Park Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, A, 6.15%, 2039 | 1,140,000 | 757,336 | ||||
Main Street Community Development District, FL, A, 6.8%, 2038 | 550,000 | 467,044 | ||||
Main Street Community Development District, FL, B, 6.9%, 2017 | 420,000 | 397,979 | ||||
Naturewalk Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., B, 5.3%, 2016 | 650,000 | 405,535 | ||||
New Port Tampa Bay Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, B, 5.3%, 2012 (d) | 440,000 | 141,152 | ||||
North Springs Improvement District, FL, Special Assessment (Parkland Golf Country Club), B-1, 5.125%, 2015 | 400,000 | 366,504 | ||||
North Springs Improvement District, FL, Special Assessment (Parkland Golf Country Club), B-2, 5.125%, 2015 | 110,000 | 100,789 | ||||
Ohio County, WV, Commission Tax Increment Rev. (Fort Henry Centre), A, 5.85%, 2034 | 235,000 | 217,060 | ||||
Old Palm Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment (Palm Beach Gardens), A, 5.9%, 2035 | 230,000 | 169,363 | ||||
Old Palm Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment (Palm Beach Gardens), B, 5.375%, 2014 | 240,000 | 218,762 | ||||
OTC Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, A, 5.3%, 2038 | 970,000 | 719,905 | ||||
Overland Park, KS, Special Assessment (Tallgrass Creek), 4.85%, 2016 | 170,000 | 137,700 | ||||
Overland Park, KS, Special Assessment (Tallgrass Creek), 5.125%, 2028 | 332,000 | 217,460 | ||||
Panther Trace II, Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.125%, 2013 | 315,000 | 254,473 | ||||
Panther Trace II, Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, B, 5%, 2010 | 190,000 | 183,071 | ||||
Parker Road Community Development District, FL, A, 5.6%, 2038 | 330,000 | 189,054 | ||||
Parkway Center Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, B, 5.625%, 2014 | 930,000 | 676,817 | ||||
Paseo Community Development District, FL, B, 4.875%, 2010 (d) | 390,000 | 66,300 | ||||
Prince Georges County, MD, Special Obligation (National Harbor Project), 5.2%, 2034 | 245,000 | 210,411 | ||||
Riverwood Estates Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, B, 5%, 2013 (d) | 870,000 | 174,000 | ||||
Sterling Hill Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 5.5%, 2010 | 175,000 | 159,542 |
27
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Tax Assessment - continued | ||||||
Stone Ridge, CO, Metropolitan District No. 2, 7.25%, 2031 | $ | 800,000 | $ | 656,632 | ||
Tolomato Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 6.65%, 2040 | 1,070,000 | 878,834 | ||||
Tuscany Reserve Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, B, 5.25%, 2016 | 785,000 | 516,420 | ||||
Villa Vizcaya Community Development District, FL, A, 5.55%, 2039 | 210,000 | 122,193 | ||||
Watergrass Community Development District, FL, A, 5.375%, 2039 | 420,000 | 221,159 | ||||
Watergrass Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, B, 4.875%, 2010 | 715,000 | 615,915 | ||||
Wentworth Estates Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, B, 5.125%, 2012 (d) | 340,000 | 128,741 | ||||
$ | 16,105,312 | |||||
Tobacco - 7.8% | ||||||
Badger, WI, Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., 6.125%, 2012 (c)(f) | $ | 2,625,000 | $ | 2,814,420 | ||
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, A-2, 5.875%, 2030 | 6,585,000 | 5,555,238 | ||||
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, A-2, 6%, 2042 | 220,000 | 169,631 | ||||
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, A-2, 5.875%, 2047 | 1,905,000 | 1,424,711 | ||||
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, A-2, 6.5%, 2047 | 1,420,000 | 1,166,757 | ||||
California County, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement, L.A. County, A, 0% to 2010, 5.65% to 2041 | 485,000 | 359,613 | ||||
California Statewide Financing Authority, Tobacco Settlement, 5.625%, 2029 | 1,485,000 | 1,462,027 | ||||
District of Columbia, Tobacco Settlement, 6.25%, 2024 | 900,000 | 909,675 | ||||
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., A-4, 7.8%, 2013 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,195,460 | ||||
Inland Empire, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Asset Backed, Capital Appreciation, C-1, 0%, 2036 | 3,270,000 | 311,729 | ||||
Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority, Tobacco Settlement Rev., Asset Backed, B, 5.6%, 2034 | 1,635,000 | 1,410,972 | ||||
Louisiana Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., 2001-B, 5.5%, 2030 | 1,435,000 | 1,435,301 | ||||
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority Rev., Asset Backed, A, 6%, 2048 | 1,125,000 | 857,858 | ||||
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 5.75%, 2012 (c) | 615,000 | 660,172 | ||||
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 7%, 2013 (c) | 15,000 | 17,621 | ||||
Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority, CA, Tobacco Settlement Rev. (Santa Clara), Capital Appreciation, A, 0%, 2036 | 2,115,000 | 217,908 | ||||
Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority, CA, Tobacco Settlement Rev. (Santa Clara), Capital Appreciation, A, 0%, 2041 | 1,560,000 | 102,398 |
28
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Tobacco - continued | ||||||
South Carolina Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., B, 6.375%, 2011 (c) | $ | 1,075,000 | $ | 1,144,112 | ||
Washington Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., 6.5%, 2026 | 135,000 | 139,107 | ||||
$ | 21,354,710 | |||||
Toll Roads - 1.3% | ||||||
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado Rev., Capital Appreciation, B, NATL, 0%, 2027 | $ | 4,115,000 | $ | 1,354,247 | ||
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Capital Appreciation, C, AGM, 0%, 2033 | 2,780,000 | 2,071,962 | ||||
$ | 3,426,209 | |||||
Transportation - Special Tax - 1.2% | ||||||
Telluride, CO, Real Estate Transfer Assessment Rev. (Gondola Transit Co.), ETM, 11.5%, 2012 (c) | $ | 2,900,000 | $ | 3,350,428 | ||
Universities - Colleges - 13.6% | ||||||
Brevard County, FL, Industrial Development Rev. (TUFF Florida Tech LLC Project), 6.75%, 2039 | $ | 1,055,000 | $ | 1,083,211 | ||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (California Baptist University), A, 5.4%, 2027 | 370,000 | 320,535 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (California Baptist University), A, 5.5%, 2038 | 420,000 | 335,320 | ||||
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Rev. (Baylor College of Medicine), D, 5.625%, 2032 | 510,000 | 478,166 | ||||
Houston, TX, Community College Systems, COP, NATL, 7.875%, 2012 (c) | 2,500,000 | 2,868,475 | ||||
Illinois Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Augustana College), A, 5.625%, 2022 | 400,000 | 406,512 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), A, 5%, 2031 | 795,000 | 719,380 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), A, 5%, 2036 | 1,380,000 | 1,226,116 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Roosevelt University Project), 6.25%, 2029 | 905,000 | 936,793 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Roosevelt University Project), 6.5%, 2039 | 300,000 | 306,963 | ||||
Louisiana State University (Health Sciences Center Project), NATL, 6.375%, 2031 | 2,500,000 | 2,529,050 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Simmons College), H, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2033 | 110,000 | 107,531 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 5%, 2038 (u) | 20,000,000 | 21,143,600 |
29
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Universities - Colleges - continued | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Simmons College), I, 8%, 2029 | $ | 535,000 | $ | 607,728 | ||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Suffolk University), A, 6.25%, 2030 | 1,370,000 | 1,439,993 | ||||
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Medicine & Dentistry), B, 6%, 2017 | 590,000 | 669,715 | ||||
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Medicine & Dentistry), B, 7.5%, 2032 | 1,065,000 | 1,220,405 | ||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Lasalle University), A, 5.25%, 2027 | 105,000 | 103,148 | ||||
Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Whitworth University), 5.875%, 2034 | 540,000 | 561,519 | ||||
$ | 37,064,160 | |||||
Universities - Dormitories - 0.1% | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Lancer Educational Student Housing Project), 5.625%, 2033 | $ | 380,000 | $ | 308,378 | ||
Universities - Secondary Schools - 2.4% | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Escondido Charter High School), 7.5%, 2011 (c) | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,107,150 | ||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Escondido Charter High School), 7.5%, 2011 (c) | 515,000 | 553,460 | ||||
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Uplift Education), A, 6.125%, 2040 | 570,000 | 567,236 | ||||
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Uplift Education), A, 6.25%, 2045 | 350,000 | 348,492 | ||||
Colorado Housing Finance Development Rev. (Evergreen Country Day School), 5.875%, 2037 | 285,000 | 199,671 | ||||
La Vernia, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (KIPP, Inc.), A, 6.25%, 2039 | 365,000 | 377,410 | ||||
Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lee Charter Foundation), A, 5.25%, 2027 | 430,000 | 339,304 | ||||
Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Lee Charter Foundation), A, 5.375%, 2037 | 945,000 | 698,053 | ||||
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Washington Christian Academy), 5.5%, 2038 (a) | 140,000 | 63,550 | ||||
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, Economic Development Authority Rev. (Our Lady of Good Council), A, 6%, 2035 | 150,000 | 140,442 | ||||
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority Rev. (YMCA Service Learning Academy), 7.625%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,001,140 |
30
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Universities - Secondary Schools - continued | ||||||
Utah County, UT, Charter School Rev. (Lakeview Academy), A, 5.625%, 2037 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 396,630 | ||
Utah County, UT, Charter School Rev. (Renaissance Academy), A, 5.625%, 2037 | 285,000 | 222,793 | ||||
Utah County, UT, Charter School Rev. (Ronald Wilson Reagan Academy), A, 6%, 2038 | 795,000 | 645,500 | ||||
$ | 6,660,831 | |||||
Utilities - Cogeneration - 0.4% | ||||||
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority, Power Rev., Upper Lynn Canal Regional Power, 5.8%, 2018 | $ | 830,000 | $ | 824,871 | ||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Rev., Resource Recovery Rev. (Colver), G, 5.125%, 2015 | 300,000 | 291,153 | ||||
$ | 1,116,024 | |||||
Utilities - Investor Owned - 8.2% | ||||||
Brazos River Authority, TX, Authority Texas Rev. (Reliant Energy, Inc.), A, 5.375%, 2019 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 503,700 | ||
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), C, 5.75%, 2036 (b) | 1,075,000 | 1,046,728 | ||||
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), D, 5.4%, 2029 (b) | 85,000 | 63,311 | ||||
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Energy Co. LLC), 5%, 2041 | 835,000 | 387,390 | ||||
Chula Vista, CA, Industrial Development Rev. (San Diego Gas), 5.875%, 2034 | 470,000 | 518,419 | ||||
Connecticut Development Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (Connecticut Light & Power Co.), 5.95%, 2028 | 2,270,000 | 2,279,421 | ||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service New Mexico), A, 6.3%, 2016 | 2,195,000 | 2,201,739 | ||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service New Mexico), C, 5.8%, 2022 | 2,105,000 | 2,110,705 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Dominion Energy Brayton), 5.75%, 2042 (b) | 165,000 | 175,468 | ||||
Matagorda County, TX (CenterPoint Energy), 5.6%, 2027 | 1,500,000 | 1,538,670 | ||||
Matagorda County, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (Central Power & Light Co.), A, 6.3%, 2029 | 525,000 | 571,515 | ||||
Matagorda County, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (Reliant Energy), 5.95%, 2030 | 1,655,000 | 1,596,926 | ||||
Mecklenburg County, VA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (UAE Mecklenburg LP), 6.5%, 2017 | 800,000 | 806,944 | ||||
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service of New Hampshire), 6%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,012,840 |
31
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Utilities - Investor Owned - continued | ||||||
Owen County, KY, Waterworks System Rev. (American Water Co. Project), A, 6.25%, 2039 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 427,664 | ||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (Allegheny Energy Supply Co. LLC), 7%, 2039 | 1,165,000 | 1,290,552 | ||||
Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 5.75%, 2029 | 1,315,000 | 1,326,730 | ||||
Red River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (AEP Texas Central Co.), NATL, 4.45%, 2020 | 760,000 | 738,332 | ||||
Sabine River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), 5.2%, 2028 | 340,000 | 181,699 | ||||
Sabine River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), 5.75%, 2030 (b) | 610,000 | 593,957 | ||||
Sweetwater County, WY, Pollution Control Rev. (Idaho Power Co.), 5.25%, 2026 | 1,020,000 | 1,076,233 | ||||
West Feliciana Parish, LA, Pollution Control Rev. (Gulf States Utilities Co.), 5.8%, 2015 | 810,000 | 810,859 | ||||
West Feliciana Parish, LA, Pollution Control Rev. (Gulf States Utilities Co.), 5.8%, 2016 | 540,000 | 519,113 | ||||
Yuma County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority (Far West Water & Sewer, Inc.), 6.375%, 2037 | 735,000 | 622,023 | ||||
$ | 22,400,938 | |||||
Utilities - Other - 2.4% | ||||||
California M-S-R Energy Authority Gas Rev., A, 7%, 2034 | $ | 210,000 | $ | 242,430 | ||
California M-S-R Energy Authority Gas Rev., A, 6.5%, 2039 | 465,000 | 506,534 | ||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., A, 5%, 2022 | 500,000 | 506,675 | ||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., A, 5.5%, 2026 | 285,000 | 282,253 | ||||
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., A, 5.25%, 2018 | 440,000 | 461,696 | ||||
Public Authority for Colorado Energy Natural Gas Purchase Rev., 6.5%, 2038 | 50,000 | 54,409 | ||||
Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Rev., 5%, 2037 | 1,900,000 | 1,709,373 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., A, 5%, 2014 | 455,000 | 472,322 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., A, 5.25%, 2022 | 510,000 | 500,891 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., A, 5.25%, 2023 | 80,000 | 78,122 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., A, 5.25%, 2024 | 560,000 | 543,502 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., A, 5.25%, 2026 | 905,000 | 866,655 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., C, 5%, 2025 | 450,000 | 423,468 | ||||
$ | 6,648,330 | |||||
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue - 0.3% | ||||||
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Rev., A, 6%, 2022 | $ | 710,000 | $ | 780,574 | ||
Total Municipal Bonds (Identified Cost, $399,580,701) | $ | 388,180,078 |
32
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Money Market Funds (v) - 0.6% | ||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.19%, at Cost and Net Asset Value |
1,682,111 | $ | 1,682,111 | |||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $401,262,812) | $ | 389,862,189 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (0.9)% | (2,516,451 | ) | ||||
Preferred shares (Issued by the Fund) - (41.6)% | (113,750,000 | ) | ||||
Net Assets applicable to common shares - 100.0% | $ | 273,595,738 |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | Mandatory tender date is earlier than stated maturity date. |
(c) | Refunded bond. |
(d) | Non-income producing security in default. |
(f) | All or a portion of the security has been segregated as collateral for open futures contracts. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $6,478,408, representing 2.4% of net assets applicable to common shares. |
(p) | Primary inverse floater. |
(q) | Interest received was less than stated coupon rate. |
(u) | Underlying security deposited into special purpose trust (the trust) by investment banker upon creation of self-deposited inverse floaters. |
(v) | Underlying fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
Restricted Securities | Acquisition Date |
Cost | Current Market Value | |||
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.4%, 2049 | 10/14/04 | $1,000,000 | $655,180 | |||
% of Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares | 0.2% |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
COP | Certificate of Participation |
ETM | Escrowed to Maturity |
LOC | Letter of Credit |
33
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Insurers | ||
AGM | Assured Guaranty Municipal | |
AMBAC | AMBAC Indemnity Corp. | |
ASSD | GTY Assured Guaranty Insurance Co. | |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. | |
FHA | Federal Housing Administration | |
FHLMC | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. | |
FNMA | Federal National Mortgage Assn. | |
GNMA | Government National Mortgage Assn. | |
NATL | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. | |
PSF | Permanent School Fund | |
SYNCORA | Syncora Guarantee Inc. |
Derivative Contracts at 4/30/10
Futures Contracts Outstanding at 4/30/10
Description | Currency | Contracts | Value | Expiration Date |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||
Liability Derivatives | |||||||||||
Interest Rate Futures | |||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note 10 yr (Short) | USD | 66 | $7,781,813 | Jun-10 | $(82,367 | ) | |||||
U.S. Treasury Bond 30 yr (Short) | USD | 200 | 23,812,500 | Jun-10 | (564,763 | ) | |||||
$(647,130 | ) | ||||||||||
At April 30, 2010, the fund had sufficient cash and/or other liquid securities to cover any commitments under these derivative contracts.
See Notes to Financial Statements
34
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 4/30/10 (unaudited)
This statement represents your funds balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | |||||
Investments- |
|||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $399,580,701) |
$388,180,078 | ||||
Underlying funds, at cost and value |
1,682,111 | ||||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $401,262,812) |
$389,862,189 | ||||
Cash |
118,263 | ||||
Receivables for |
|||||
Investments sold |
605,889 | ||||
Interest |
7,924,296 | ||||
Other assets |
26,863 | ||||
Total assets |
$398,537,500 | ||||
Liabilities | |||||
Payables for |
|||||
Distributions on common shares |
$146 | ||||
Distributions on preferred shares |
2,938 | ||||
Daily variation margin on open futures contracts |
199,688 | ||||
Investments purchased |
799,863 | ||||
Payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets |
10,019,200 | ||||
Payable for interest expense and fees |
22,723 | ||||
Payable to affiliates |
|||||
Investment adviser |
17,201 | ||||
Transfer agent and dividend disbursing costs |
3,005 | ||||
Administrative services fee |
343 | ||||
Payable for independent Trustees compensation |
78,732 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
47,923 | ||||
Total liabilities |
$11,191,762 | ||||
Preferred shares | |||||
Series T and Series TH auction preferred shares (4,550 shares issued and outstanding at $25,000 per share) at liquidation value |
$113,750,000 | ||||
Net assets applicable to common shares |
$273,595,738 | ||||
Net assets consist of | |||||
Paid-in capital common shares |
$316,885,192 | ||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(12,047,753 | ) | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments |
(34,283,701 | ) | |||
Undistributed net investment income |
3,042,000 | ||||
Net assets applicable to common shares |
$273,595,738 | ||||
Preferred shares, at liquidation value (4,550 shares issued and outstanding at $25,000 per share) |
113,750,000 | ||||
Net assets including preferred shares |
$387,345,738 | ||||
Common shares of beneficial interest outstanding |
40,580,133 | ||||
Net asset value per common share (net assets of |
$6.74 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
35
Financial Statements
Six months ended 4/30/10 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||||
Interest income |
$12,495,429 | |||||
Dividends from underlying funds |
3,523 | |||||
Total investment income |
$12,498,952 | |||||
Expenses |
||||||
Management fee |
$1,538,505 | |||||
Transfer agent and dividend disbursing costs |
35,489 | |||||
Administrative services fee |
32,192 | |||||
Independent Trustees compensation |
26,818 | |||||
Stock exchange fee |
17,927 | |||||
Preferred shares service fee |
68,950 | |||||
Custodian fee |
28,590 | |||||
Shareholder communications |
20,977 | |||||
Auditing fees |
35,031 | |||||
Legal fees |
16,345 | |||||
Interest expense and fees |
34,756 | |||||
Miscellaneous |
51,402 | |||||
Total expenses |
$1,906,982 | |||||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser |
(587 | ) | ||||
Net expenses |
$1,906,395 | |||||
Net investment income |
$10,592,557 | |||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||||
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) |
||||||
Investment transactions |
$(523,890 | ) | ||||
Futures contracts |
57,254 | |||||
Swap transactions |
(421,000 | ) | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
$(887,636 | ) | ||||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
||||||
Investments |
$8,733,021 | |||||
Futures contracts |
(478,489 | ) | ||||
Swap transactions |
740,739 | |||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
$8,995,271 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
$8,107,635 | |||||
Distributions declared to preferred shareholders |
$(218,871 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from operations |
$18,481,321 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
36
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Six months ended 4/30/10 |
Year ended 10/31/09 |
|||||
Change in net assets | (unaudited) | |||||
From operations | ||||||
Net investment income |
$10,592,557 | $21,478,429 | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
(887,636 | ) | (6,261,510 | ) | ||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
8,995,271 | 39,019,996 | ||||
Distributions declared to preferred shareholders |
(218,871 | ) | (925,362 | ) | ||
Change in net assets from operations |
$18,481,321 | $53,311,553 | ||||
Distributions declared to common shareholders | ||||||
From net investment income |
$(10,208,943 | ) | $(19,716,709 | ) | ||
Net asset value of shares issued to common shareholders in reinvestment of distributions |
$780,913 | $503,952 | ||||
Total change in net assets |
$9,053,291 | $34,098,796 | ||||
Net assets applicable to common shares | ||||||
At beginning of period |
264,542,447 | 230,443,651 | ||||
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $3,042,000 and $2,877,257, respectively) |
$273,595,738 | $264,542,447 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
37
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the funds financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Six months ended 4/30/10 (unaudited) |
Years ended 10/31 | |||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning |
$6.54 | $5.71 | $7.69 | $8.06 | $7.92 | $7.86 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations |
||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) |
$0.26 | $0.53 | $0.55 | $ 0.57 | (z) | $0.58 | $0.59 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain |
0.20 | 0.81 | (1.94 | ) | (0.35 | )(z) | 0.17 | 0.10 | ||||||||||
Distributions declared to |
(0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.12 | ) | (0.08 | ) | ||||||
Total from investment operations |
$0.45 | $1.32 | $(1.52 | ) | $0.09 | $0.63 | $0.61 | |||||||||||
Less distributions declared to common shareholders |
||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income, |
$(0.25 | ) | $(0.49 | ) | $(0.46 | ) | $(0.46 | ) | $(0.49 | ) | $(0.55 | ) | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
$6.74 | $6.54 | $5.71 | $7.69 | $8.06 | $7.92 | ||||||||||||
Common share market value, |
$6.89 | $6.44 | $4.91 | $7.31 | $8.20 | $8.27 | ||||||||||||
Total return at common market |
11.13 | (n) | 43.37 | (28.13 | ) | (5.48 | ) | 5.41 | 13.18 | |||||||||
Total return at net asset |
7.05 | (n) | 25.19 | (20.55 | ) | 1.17 | 8.24 | 7.92 | ||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets applicable to common shares) and Supplemental data: |
||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense |
1.44 | (a) | 1.66 | 1.57 | 1.47 | 1.45 | 1.44 | |||||||||||
Expenses after expense |
1.44 | (a) | 1.66 | 1.57 | 1.47 | 1.45 | 1.44 | |||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions |
1.41 | (a) | 1.61 | 1.49 | 1.40 | 1.45 | 1.44 | |||||||||||
Net investment income (p) |
7.99 | (a) | 9.39 | 7.82 | 7.23 | (z) | 7.30 | 7.45 | ||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
6 | 10 | 25 | 24 | 17 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period |
$273,596 | $264,542 | $230,444 | $309,690 | $323,099 | $316,196 |
38
Financial Highlights continued
Six months ended 4/30/10 (unaudited) |
Years ended 10/31 | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Supplemental Ratios (%): | |||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets including preferred shares and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l)(p) |
0.99 | (a) | 1.08 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.99 | ||||||
Preferred shares dividends (y) |
0.17 | (a) | 0.40 | 1.81 | 1.63 | 1.46 | 0.95 | ||||||
Net investment income available to |
7.82 | (a) | 8.99 | 6.01 | 5.60 | 5.84 | 6.49 | ||||||
Senior Securities: | |||||||||||||
Total preferred shares outstanding |
4,550 | 4,550 | 4,550 | 5,600 | 5,600 | 5,600 | |||||||
Asset coverage per preferred share (k) |
$85,131 | $83,141 | $75,647 | $80,302 | $82,696 | $81,464 | |||||||
Involuntary liquidation preference per |
$25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | |||||||
Average market value per preferred |
$25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 |
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(j) | Total return at net asset value is calculated using the net asset value of the fund, not the publicly traded price and therefore may be different than the total return at market value. |
(k) | Calculated by subtracting the funds total liabilities (not including preferred shares) from the funds total assets and dividing this number by the number of preferred shares outstanding. |
(l) | Interest expense and fees relate to payments made to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets. |
(m) | Amount excludes accrued unpaid distributions to Auction Preferred Shareholders. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(p) | Ratio excludes dividend payment on auction preferred shares. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(x) | Average market value represents the approximate fair value of the funds liability. |
(y) | Ratio is based on average net assets applicable to common shares. |
(z) | The fund applied a change in estimate for amortization of premium on certain debt securities during the year that resulted in an increase of $0.04 per share to net investment income, a decrease of $0.04 per share to net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, and an increase of 0.49% to the net investment income ratio for the year ended October 31, 2007. The change in estimate had no impact on net assets, net asset value per share or total return. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
39
(unaudited)
(1) | Business and Organization |
MFS Municipal Income Trust (the fund) is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a closed-end management investment company.
(2) | Significant Accounting Policies |
General The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the funds Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The value of municipal instruments can be affected by changes in their actual or perceived credit quality. The credit quality of municipal instruments can be affected by, among other things, the financial condition of the issuer or guarantor, the issuers future borrowing plans and sources of revenue, the economic feasibility of the revenue bond project or general borrowing purpose, political or economic developments in the region where the instrument is issued and the liquidity of the security. Municipal instruments generally trade in the over-the-counter market. Municipal instruments backed by current and anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets can be negatively affected by the discontinuance of the taxation supporting the projects or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. If the Internal Revenue Service determines an issuer of a municipal instrument has not complied with the applicable tax requirements, the security could decline in value, interest from the security could become taxable and the funds may be required to issue Forms 1099-DIV.
Investment Valuations Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures
40
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
contracts are primarily traded. Swaps are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the funds investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the funds valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investments value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the funds net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the funds net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the funds net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the funds assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair
41
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
value hierarchy. In such cases, an investments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The funds assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the advisers own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures, forwards, swap contracts, and written options. The following is a summary of the levels used as of April 30, 2010 in valuing the funds assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | $388,180,078 | $ | $388,180,078 | ||||||
Mutual Funds | 1,682,111 | | | 1,682,111 | ||||||
Total Investments | $1,682,111 | $388,180,078 | $ | $389,862,189 | ||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||
Futures | $(647,130 | ) | $ | $ | $(647,130 | ) |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Derivatives The fund may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the fund, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives may be used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivatives original cost.
Derivative instruments include written options, purchased options, futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements. The funds period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract Tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
42
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at April 30, 2010:
Fair Value (a) | |||||||
Risk | Derivative | Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | ||||
Interest Rate Contracts |
Interest Rate Futures | $ | $(647,130 | ) |
(a) | The value of futures contracts outstanding includes cumulative appreciation/depreciation as reported in the funds Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day variation margin for futures contracts is separately reported within the funds Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended April 30, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Futures Contracts |
Swap Transactions |
||||
Interest Rate Contracts | $57,254 | $(421,000 | ) |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended April 30, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Futures Contracts |
Swap Transactions | ||||
Interest Rate Contracts | $(478,489 | ) | $740,739 |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the funds credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported balance sheet assets and liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
43
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forwards, swaps and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Futures Contracts The fund may use futures contracts to gain or to hedge against broad market, interest rate or currency exposure. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date. Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures is realized. The fund bears the risk of interest rates, exchange rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchanges clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The funds maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.
Swap Agreements The fund may enter into swap agreements. A swap is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap are reflected as premiums paid or received on the Statement of Assets
44
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap transactions are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. The risk is further mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the funds exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
The fund may enter into an interest rate swap in order to manage its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Interest rate swap agreements involve the periodic exchange of cash flows, between the fund and a counterparty, based on the difference between two interest rates applied to a notional principal amount. The two interest rates exchanged may either be a fixed rate and a floating rate or two floating rates based on different indices.
The funds maximum risk of loss from counterparty credit risk is the discounted net value of the cash flows to be received from/paid to the counterparty over the contracts remaining life, to the extent that that amount is positive. This risk is mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the funds exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Inverse Floaters The fund invests in municipal inverse floating rate securities which are structured by the issuer (known as primary market inverse floating rate securities) or by an investment banker utilizing municipal bonds which have already been issued (known as secondary market inverse floating rate securities) to have variable rates of interest which typically move in the opposite direction of short term interest rates. A secondary market inverse floating rate security is created when an investment banker transfers a fixed rate municipal bond to a special purpose trust, and causes the trust to (a) issue floating rate certificates to third parties, in an amount equal to a fraction of the par amount of the deposited bonds (these certificates usually pay tax-exempt interest at short-term interest rates that typically reset weekly; and the certificate holders typically, on seven days notice, have the option to tender their certificates to the investment banker or another party for redemption at par plus accrued interest), and (b) issue inverse floating rate certificates (sometimes referred to as inverse floaters). If the holder of the inverse floater
45
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
transfers the municipal bonds to an investment banker for the purpose of depositing the municipal bonds into the special purpose trust, the inverse floating rate certificates that are issued by the trust are referred to as self-deposited inverse floaters. If the bonds held by the trust are purchased by the investment banker for deposit into the trust from someone other than the purchasers of the inverse floaters, the inverse floating rate certificates that are issued by the trust are referred to as externally deposited inverse floaters. Such self-deposited inverse floaters held by the fund are accounted for as secured borrowings, with the municipal bonds reflected in the investments of the fund and amounts owed to the holder of the floating rate certificate under the provisions of the trust, which amounts are paid solely from the assets of the trust, reflected as liabilities of the fund in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities under the caption, Payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets. The carrying value of the funds payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets as reported on the funds Statement of Assets and Liabilities approximates its fair value. At April 30, 2010, the funds payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets was $10,019,200 and the interest rate on these floating rate certificates issued by the trust was 0.17%. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the average payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets was $10,015,133 at a weighted average interest rate of 0.70%. Interest expense and fees relate to interest payments made to the holder of certain floating rate certificates and associated fees, both of which are made from trust assets. Interest expense and fees are recorded as incurred. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, interest expense and fees in connection with self-deposited inverse floaters was $34,756. Primary and externally deposited inverse floaters held by the fund are not accounted for as secured borrowings.
Indemnifications Under the funds organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The funds maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to
46
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables. The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations. Legal fees and other related expenses incurred to preserve and protect the value of a security owned are added to the cost of the security; other legal fees are expensed. Capital infusions made directly to the security issuer, which are generally non-recurring, incurred to protect or enhance the value of high-yield debt securities, are reported as additions to the cost basis of the security. Costs that are incurred to negotiate the terms or conditions of capital infusions or that are expected to result in a plan of reorganization are reported as realized losses. Ongoing costs incurred to protect or enhance an investment, or costs incurred to pursue other claims or legal actions, are expensed.
Fees Paid Indirectly The funds custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, custody fees were not reduced.
Tax Matters and Distributions The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The funds federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to expiration of capital loss carryforwards, amortization and accretion of debt securities, and defaulted bonds.
47
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
10/31/09 | ||
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | $342,342 | |
Tax-exempt income | 20,299,729 | |
$20,642,071 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 4/30/10 | |||
Cost of investments | $389,246,636 | ||
Gross appreciation | 18,483,011 | ||
Gross depreciation | (27,886,658 | ) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $(9,403,647 | ) | |
As of 10/31/09 | |||
Undistributed ordinary income | 27,640 | ||
Undistributed tax-exempt income | 3,466,796 | ||
Capital loss carryforwards | (35,588,486 | ) | |
Other temporary differences | (1,357,918 | ) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | (18,109,864 | ) |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
10/31/10 | $(2,883,947 | ) | |
10/31/11 | (10,944,821 | ) | |
10/31/12 | (1,858,513 | ) | |
10/31/13 | (9,679,589 | ) | |
10/31/16 | (3,401,503 | ) | |
10/31/17 | (6,820,113 | ) | |
$(35,588,486 | ) |
(3) | Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Adviser The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.40% of the funds average weekly net assets (including the value of the auction preferred shares) and 6.32% of gross income. Gross income is calculated based on tax rules that generally include
48
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
the amortization of premium and exclude the accretion of market discount, which may differ from investment income reported in the Statement of Operations. The management fee, from net assets and gross income, incurred for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.81% of the funds average daily net assets including the value of the auction preferred shares.
Transfer Agent The fund engages Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (Computershare) as the sole transfer agent for the funds common shares. MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC) monitors and supervises the activities of Computershare for an agreed upon fee approved by the Board of Trustees. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, these fees paid to MFSC amounted to $13,351. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses paid by MFSC on behalf of the fund. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not pay any out-of-pocket expenses to MFSC.
Administrator MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets including the value of the auction preferred shares. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0170% of the funds average daily net assets including the value of the auction preferred shares.
Trustees and Officers Compensation The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or to officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (DB plan) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB Plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. The DB Plan resulted in a pension expense of $4,783 and is included in independent Trustees compensation for the six months ended April 30, 2010. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under the DB plan amounted to $72,846 at April 30, 2010, and is included in payable for independent Trustees compensation on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
49
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
Other This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $1,632 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $587, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund may invest in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in dividends from underlying funds on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
(4) | Portfolio Securities |
Purchases and sales of investments, other than U.S. Government securities, purchased option transactions, and short-term obligations, aggregated $22,398,932 and $27,374,172, respectively.
(5) | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
The funds Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. The fund reserves the right to repurchase shares of beneficial interest of the fund subject to Trustee approval. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not repurchase any shares. Transaction in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 4/30/10 |
Year ended 10/31/09 | |||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 118,166 | $780,913 | 83,792 | $503,952 |
(6) | Line of Credit |
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its
50
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the funds commitment fee and interest expense were $2,089 and $0, respectively, and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations.
(7) | Transactions in Underlying Funds-Affiliated Issuers |
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
Underlying Funds | Beginning Shares/Par Amount |
Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount |
Dispositions Shares/Par Amount |
Ending Shares/Par Amount | |||||
MFS Institutional Money | |||||||||
Market Portfolio | 1,120,906 | 38,899,204 | (38,337,999 | ) | 1,682,111 | ||||
Underlying Funds | Realized Gain (Loss) |
Capital Gain Distributions |
Dividend Income |
Ending Value | |||||
MFS Institutional Money | |||||||||
Market Portfolio | $ | $ | $3,523 | $1,682,111 |
(8) | Auction Preferred Shares |
The fund issued 2,275 shares of Auction Preferred Shares (APS), series T and 2,275 of APS, series TH. Dividends are cumulative at a rate that is reset every seven days for both series through an auction process. If the APS are unable to be remarketed on a remarketing date as part of the auction process, the fund would be required to pay the maximum applicable rate on APS to holders of such shares for successive dividend periods until such time when the shares are successfully remarketed. The maximum rate on APS is equal to 110% of the higher of (i) the Taxable Equivalent of the Short-Term Municipal Bond Rate or (ii) the AA Composite Commercial Paper Rate.
Since February 2008, regularly scheduled auctions for APS issued by closed end funds, including this fund, have consistently failed because of insufficient demand (bids to buy shares) to meet the supply (shares offered for sale) at each auction. In a failed auction, APS holders cannot sell their shares tendered for sale. While repeated auction failures have affected the liquidity for APS, they do not constitute a default or automatically alter the credit quality of the APS,
51
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
and APS holders have continued to receive dividends at the previously defined maximum rate. During the six months ended April 30,2010, the APS dividend rates ranged from 0.26% to 0.60% for series T and from 0.24% to 0.60% for series TH. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the average daily dividend rate was 0.39% for both series T and series TH. These developments with respect to APS do not affect the management or investment policies of the fund. However, one implication of these auction failures for Common shareholders is that the funds cost of leverage will be higher than it otherwise would have been had the auctions continued to be successful. As a result, the funds future Common share earnings may be lower than they otherwise would have been. To the extent that investments are purchased with the issuance of preferred shares, the funds net asset value will increase or decrease at a greater rate than a comparable unleveraged fund.
The fund pays an annual service fee to broker-dealers with customers who are beneficial owners of the preferred shares. The service fee is equivalent to 0.25% of the applicable preferred share liquidation value while the preferred share auctions are successful or to 0.15% or less, varying by broker-dealer, while the auctions are failing. The APS are redeemable at the option of the fund in whole or in part at the redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. The APS are also subject to mandatory redemption if certain requirements relating to its asset maintenance coverage are not satisfied. The fund is required to maintain certain asset coverage with respect to the APS as defined in the funds By-Laws and the Investment Company Act of 1940 and, as such is not permitted to declare common share dividends unless the funds APS have a minimum asset coverage ratio of 200% after declaration of the common share dividends.
52
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Shareholders of MFS Municipal Income Trust:
We have reviewed the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of MFS Municipal Income Trust (the Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of April 30, 2010, and the related statements of operations, changes in net assets, and financial highlights for the six-month period ended April 30, 2010. These interim financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Trusts management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements and financial highlights referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the statement of changes in net assets for the year ended October 31, 2009, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended October 31, 2009, and in our report dated December 17, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on such statement of changes in net assets and financial highlights.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 16, 2010
53
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
A discussion regarding the Boards most recent review and renewal of the funds Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the funds name under Closed End Funds in the Products and Performance section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SECs Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SECs Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The funds Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The funds Form N-Q is available on the EDGAR database on the Commissions Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and copies of this information may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
A shareholder can also obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the News & Commentary section of mfs.com or by clicking on the funds name under Closed End Funds in the Products and Performance section of mfs.com.
54
Transfer Agent, Registrar and
Dividend Disbursing Agent
Call
1-800-637-2304
9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time
Write
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
500 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02116 | New York Stock Exchange Symbol: MFM |
ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS. |
The Registrant has not amended any provision in its Code of Ethics (the Code) that relates to any element of the Codes definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 2 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 6. | SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
A schedule of investments for each series of the Registrant is included as part of the report to shareholders of such series under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
There were no changes during this period.
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
MFS Municipal Income Trust | ||||||||
Period |
(a) Total number |
(b) Average Price |
(c) Total Number of Shares |
(d) Maximum Number (or | ||||
11/01/09-11/30/09 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 4,039,579 | ||||
12/01/09-12/31/09 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 4,039,579 | ||||
1/01/10-1/31/10 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 4,039,579 | ||||
2/01/10-2/28/10 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 4,039,579 | ||||
3/01/10-3/31/10 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 4,052,179 | ||||
4/01/10-4/30/10 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 4,052,179 | ||||
Total |
0 | 0 |
Note: The Board of Trustees approves procedures to repurchase shares annually. The notification to shareholders of the program is part of the semi-annual and annual reports sent to shareholders. These annual programs begin on March 1st of each year. The programs conform to the conditions of Rule 10b-18 of the securities Exchange Act of 1934 and limit the aggregate number of shares that may be purchased in each annual period (March 1 through the following February 28) to 10% of the Registrants outstanding shares as of the first day of the plan year (March 1). The aggregate number of shares available for purchase for the March 1, 2010 plan year is 4,052,179.
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may send recommendations to the Board for nominees to the Registrants Board since the Registrant last provided disclosure as to such procedures in response to the requirements of Item 407 (c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K or this Item.
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
(a) | Based upon their evaluation of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Act)) as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR, the registrants principal financial officer and principal executive officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter covered by the report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
ITEM 12. | EXHIBITS. |
(a) | File the exhibits listed below as part of this form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated. |
(1) | Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit. |
(2) | A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2 under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2): Attached hereto. |
(b) | If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)), Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: Attached hereto. |
Notice
A copy of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Registrant is on file with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and notice is hereby given that this instrument is executed on behalf of the Registrant by an officer of the Registrant as an officer and not individually and the obligations of or arising out of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees or shareholders individually, but are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective constituent series of the Registrant.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant MFS MUNICIPAL INCOME TRUST
By (Signature and Title)* | MARIA F. DWYER | |
Maria F. Dwyer, President |
Date: June 16, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)* | MARIA F. DWYER | |
Maria F. Dwyer, President (Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: June 16, 2010
By (Signature and Title)* | JOHN M. CORCORAN | |
John M. Corcoran, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) |
Date: June 16, 2010
* | Print name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature. |