10-K
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 001-14437

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Ohio   52-2115953
(State of Incorporation)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Westpointe Corporate Center One, 5th Floor

1550 Coraopolis Heights Road

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

 

15108-2973

(Zip code)

(Address of principal executive offices)  

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(412) 893-0026

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share   New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  þ        No   ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes  ¨        No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  þ        No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes   þ        No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer  þ        Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨    Smaller reporting company  ¨
   (Do not check if a smaller company)                                

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  ¨        No   þ

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1,138 million as of June 30, 2011. The closing price of the Corporation’s common stock (“Common Stock”) on June 30, 2011, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange was $38.37.

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at January 31, 2012 was 30,201,570.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Selected Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

 

 

 

 


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

As used in this report, the terms “RTI,” “Company,” “Registrant,” “we,” “our,” and, “us” mean RTI International Metals, Inc., its predecessors and consolidated subsidiaries, taken as a whole, unless the context indicates otherwise.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

          Page
   PART I   
Item 1.    Business    1
Item 1A.    Risk Factors    10
Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments    17
Item 2.    Properties    17
Item 3.    Legal Proceedings    17
Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures    17
   PART II   
Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities    18
Item 6.    Selected Financial Data    19
Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    20
Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    39
Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data    40
Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure    91
Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures    91
Item 9B.    Other Information    91
   PART III   
Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance    92
Item 11.    Executive Compensation    92
Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters    92
Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence    93
Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services    93
   PART IV   
Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules    94
Signatures    98


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.    Business

The Company

The Company is a leading producer and global supplier of advanced titanium mill products and a manufacturer of fabricated advanced titanium and specialty metal components for the international aerospace, defense, energy, and industrial and consumer markets. It is a successor to entities that have been operating in the titanium industry since 1951. The Company first became publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange in 1990 under the name RMI Titanium Co. and the symbol “RTI”, and was reorganized into a holding company structure in 1998 under the name RTI International Metals, Inc.

On November 23, 2011, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, RTI Europe Ltd., completed an acquisition of all of the outstanding common stock of Aeromet Advanced Forming Ltd., a privately held company located in Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom. Commensurate with the purchase, Aeromet Advanced Forming, Ltd. Was renamed RTI Advanced Forming, Ltd. (“Advanced Forming”). Advanced Forming engages in hot forming, super plastic forming, diffusion bonding, and fabrication of titanium sheet and plate for the commercial aerospace and defense markets.

On February 13, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of all the outstanding common stock of REI Delaware Holding, Inc., a privately held holding company, and its operating subsidiaries, Remmele Engineering, Inc., and REI Medical, Inc. d/b/a Remmele Medical. The operations of the Remmele companies are located in the Minneapolis, Minnesota metropolitan area. Remmele provides precision machining and collaborative engineering, as well as other key technologies and services, for the aerospace, defense, and medical device markets.

Industry Overview

Titanium’s physical characteristics include a high strength-to-weight ratio, performance in extreme temperatures, and superior corrosion and erosion resistance. Relative to other metals, it is particularly effective in extremely harsh conditions. Given these properties, the scope of potential uses for titanium would be much broader than its current uses, but for its higher cost of production as compared to other metals. The first major commercial application of titanium occurred in the early 1950’s when it was used in components in aircraft gas turbine engines. Subsequent applications were developed to use the material in other aerospace component parts and in airframe construction. Traditionally, a majority of the U.S. titanium industry’s output has been used in aerospace applications. However, in recent years, significant quantities of the industry’s output have been used in non-aerospace applications, such as the global chemical processing industry, oil and gas exploration and production, geothermal energy production, medical products, consumer products, and non-aerospace military applications such as heavy artillery.

The U.S. titanium industry’s reported shipments were approximately 86 million pounds and 60 million pounds in 2010 and 2009, respectively, and are estimated to be approximately 105 million pounds in 2011. Notwithstanding, the current uncertainty in the defense industry related to the future of various defense programs, including the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (“JSF”), demand for titanium is expected to increase in 2012 due to the aircraft build-rate increases expected from both Boeing and Airbus, as well as the ramp up of the more titanium intensive Boeing 787 Dreamliner® program and continued development of the Airbus A350XWB program. The cyclical nature of the aerospace and defense industries has been the principal cause of fluctuations in the demand for titanium-related products.

Changes in titanium demand from commercial aerospace typically precede increases or decreases in aircraft production. In the Company’s experience, aircraft manufacturers and their subcontractors generally order titanium mill products six to eighteen months in advance of final aircraft production. This long lead time is due to the time it takes to produce a final assembly or part that is ready for installation in an airframe or jet engine.

 

1


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the Company’s proportional sales to each of the three primary markets it serves and a discussion of events occurring within those markets:

 

     2011     2010     2009  

Commercial Aerospace

     58     53     44

Defense

     29     30     40

Industrial and Consumer

     13     17     16

Commercial Aerospace

Historically, growth in this market was the result of increased world-wide air travel, driving not only increased aircraft production but also larger aircraft with higher titanium content than previous models. Going forward, forecasted changes in global demographics, coupled with the need for more fuel efficient aircraft due to higher energy costs and increased competition, are anticipated to drive significant growth in demand for new aircraft, as well as an expected replacement cycle of older aircraft. The leading manufacturers of commercial aircraft, Airbus and Boeing, reported an aggregate of 8,208 aircraft on order at the end of 2011, a 17% increase from the prior year. This increase was driven by strong orders for single aisle aircraft placed in 2011. This order backlog represents approximately eight years of production, at current build rates, for both Airbus and Boeing. According to Aerospace Market News, reported deliveries of large commercial aircraft by Airbus and Boeing totaled:

 

     2011      2010      2009  

Deliveries

     1,011            972            979   

Further, The Airline Monitor forecasts deliveries of large commercial jets for Airbus and Boeing of approximately:

 

     2014      2013      2012  

Forecasted deliveries

     1,385         1,305         1,165   

Airbus is now producing the largest commercial aircraft, the A380, and Boeing has started deliveries of the new 787 Dreamliner®. Additionally, Airbus is continuing development of the A350XWB to compete with Boeing’s 787 model. The A350XWB is currently expected to go into service in late 2014. All three of these new aircraft use substantially more titanium per aircraft than any other commercial aircraft. As production of these new aircraft increases, titanium demand is expected to grow to levels significantly above previous peak levels.

Defense

Military aircraft make extensive use of titanium and other specialty metals in their airframe structures and jet engines. These aircraft include U.S. fighters such as the F-22, F-18, F-15, and JSF, and European fighters such as the Mirage, Rafale, and Eurofighter-Typhoon. Military troop transports such as the C-17 and A400M also use significant quantities of these metals.

The JSF is set to become the fighter for the 21st century with production currently expected to exceed 3,000 aircraft over the life of the program. In 2007, the Company was awarded a long-term contract extension from Lockheed Martin to supply up to eight million pounds annually of titanium mill product to support full-rate production of the JSF through 2020. The products the Company will supply include sheet, plate, and billet. Under the contract, the Company is currently supplying in the range of one to two million pounds annually. While the JSF program is the subject of ongoing budget discussions due to continuing defense budget pressures, the Secretary of Defense has recently affirmed his commitment to this program.

 

2


Table of Contents

In addition to aerospace defense requirements, there are numerous titanium applications on ground vehicles and artillery, driven by its armoring (greater strength) and mobility (lighter weight) enhancements. An example of these qualities is the light-weight Howitzer artillery program, which began full-rate production in 2005. The Company is the principal titanium supplier for the Howitzer under a contract with BAE Systems through the first quarter of 2014.

Industrial & Consumer

Sales to the Industrial and Consumer markets consist primarily of sales to the medical device sector and shipments to the energy sector from the Fabrication Group, and continued shipments of ferro titanium to the specialty steel industry from the Titanium Group.

In the medical device sector, the Company collaboratively engineers innovative, precision machined solutions with its customers in the minimally invasive surgical device and implantable device markets. Demand for these products is expected to increase as populations age and cost containment becomes a bigger focus in the healthcare industry.

In the energy sector, demand for the Company’s products for oil and gas extraction, including deep-drilling exploration and production, decreased in 2011 as we completed several complex engineered components to support the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. Despite the uncertainty in the current regulatory environment that has dampened the near-term outlook for oil exploration, demand for these products is currently expected to resume growing in the medium-term due to the further development of energy from deepwater and difficult-to-reach locations around the globe. As the complexity of oil and gas exploration and production increases, the expected scope of potential uses for titanium-based structures and components is expected to increase.

Growth in developing nations such as China, India, and in the Middle East, has stimulated increased demand from the chemical process industry for heat exchangers, tubing for power plant construction, and specialty metals for desalinization plants. While the Company does not currently participate in these markets due to the nature of its product line, increased demand for these products has resulted in increased titanium demand overall.

Products and Segments

The Company conducts its operations in three reportable segments: the Titanium Group, the Fabrication Group, and the Distribution Group.

Titanium Group

The Titanium Group’s products consist primarily of titanium mill products and ferro titanium alloys (for use in steel and other industries). Its titanium furnaces (as well as other processing equipment) and products are certified and approved for use by all major domestic and most international manufacturers of commercial and military airframes and related jet engines. The attainment of such certifications is often time consuming and expensive and can serve as a barrier to entry into the titanium mill product market. The Company’s titanium mill products are fabricated into parts and utilized in aircraft structural sections such as landing gear, fasteners, tail sections, wing support and carry-through structures, and various engine components including rotor blades, vanes and discs, rings, and engine casings.

The Titanium Group’s mill products are sold to a customer base consisting primarily of manufacturing and fabrication companies in the supply chain for the commercial aerospace, defense, medical, and industrial and consumer markets. Customers include prime aircraft manufacturers and their family of subcontractors including fabricators, forge shops, extruders, castings producers, fastener manufacturers, machine shops, and metal distribution companies. Titanium mill products are semi-finished goods and usually represent the raw or starting

 

3


Table of Contents

material for these customers who then form, fabricate, machine, or further process the products into semi-finished and finished parts. In 2011, approximately 49% of the Titanium Group’s products were sold to the Company’s Fabrication and Distribution Groups, compared to 38% in 2010 and 53% in 2009, where value-added services are performed on such parts prior to their ultimate shipment to the customer. The increase in sales to the Fabrication and Distribution Groups in 2011 was primarily due to strengthening demand for the Distribution Group’s titanium products resulting in increased demand for mill products from the Titanium Group.

In connection with the Company’s long-term supply agreements for the JSF program and the Airbus family of commercial aircraft, it is constructing a new titanium forging and rolling facility in Martinsville, Virginia, and new melting facilities in Canton and Niles, Ohio, with anticipated total capital spending of approximately $160 million. The Niles melting facility is substantially complete, while the Company has capital spending of approximately $3 million remaining on the Canton melting facility. The Company has capital expenditures of approximately $40 million remaining related to the Martinsville, Virginia facility which began forging operations in December 2011 and anticipates that the rolling mill will begin production in the 2012 to 2013 timeframe. The Company expects that the Martinsville facility will enhance the Company’s throughput and shorten its lead times on certain products, primarily titanium sheet and plate. The Company continually evaluates market conditions as it moves forward with these capital projects in an effort to match its operational capabilities with anticipated demand.

Fabrication Group

The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant hard-metal expertise that form, fabricate, machine, micro machine, and assemble titanium, aluminum, and other specialty metal parts and components. Its products, many of which are engineered parts and assemblies, serve the commercial aerospace, defense, medical device, oil and gas, power generation, and chemical process industries, as well as a number of other industrial and consumer markets. With operations located in Minneapolis, Minnesota; Houston, Texas; Washington, Missouri; Laval, Canada; and Welwyn Garden City, England; the Fabrication Group provides value-added products and services such as engineered tubulars and extrusions, fabricated and machined components and sub-assemblies, as well as engineered systems for deepwater oil and gas exploration and production infrastructure. Additionally, the Group produces components used in the production of minimally invasive and implantable medical devices. The Titanium Group serves as the primary source of mill products for the Fabrication Group.

Distribution Group

The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes, cuts-to-size, and facilitates just-in-time delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys. With operations in Garden Grove, California; Windsor, Connecticut; Sullivan, Missouri; Staffordshire, England; and Rosny-Sur-Seine, France; the Distribution Group is in close proximity to its wide variety of commercial aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer customers.

Integrated Strategy

The Company believes that by providing its customers with a full-range of products and technologies, from mill products to fabricated, precision machined, kitted, and assembled titanium components, it provides significant value to its customers.

When titanium products and fabrications are involved in a project, the Titanium Group and the Fabrication Group coordinate their varied capabilities to provide the best materials solution for the Company’s customers. An example of this is the Company’s light-weight Howitzer artillery program. The Titanium Group provides the titanium mill products to the Fabrication Group, which in turn provides extrusions, hot-formed parts, and machined components which are then packaged as a kit by the Distribution Group and shipped to the customer for final assembly. This contract was awarded to the Company in 2005 for deliveries which extend through the first quarter of 2014.

 

4


Table of Contents

The amount and percentage of the Company’s consolidated net sales represented by each Group for each of the past three years is summarized in the following table:

 

     2011     2010     2009  
(dollars in millions)    $      %     $      %     $      %  

Titanium Group

   $ 160.7         30.3   $ 142.9         33.1   $ 107.6         26.4

Fabrication Group

     150.5         28.4     134.4         31.1     106.2         26.0

Distribution Group

     218.5         41.3     154.5         35.8     194.2         47.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total consolidated net sales

   $ 529.7         100.0   $ 431.8         100.0   $ 408.0         100.0
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Operating income (loss) and the percentage of consolidated operating income (loss) contributed by each Group for each of the past three years is summarized in the following table:

 

     2011     2010     2009  
(dollars in millions)    $     %     $     %     $     %  

Titanium Group

   $ 29.0        104.3   $ 18.4        130.5   $ (68.1     78.0

Fabrication Group

     (11.2     (40.3 )%      (7.6     (53.9 )%      (26.3     30.1

Distribution Group

     10.0        36.0     3.3        23.4     7.1        (8.1 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consolidated operating income (loss)

   $ 27.8        100.0   $ 14.1        100.0   $ (87.3     100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company’s total consolidated assets identified with each Group as of December 31 of each of the past three years is summarized in the following table:

 

(dollars in millions)    2011      2010      2009  

Titanium Group

   $ 356.4       $ 367.6       $ 365.7   

Fabrication Group

     296.6         246.9         239.8   

Distribution Group

     170.6         120.9         140.7   

General Corporate(1)

     309.3         371.5         108.5   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total consolidated assets

   $ 1,132.9       $ 1,106.9       $ 854.7   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Consists primarily of unallocated cash, short-term investments, and deferred tax assets.

The Company’s long-lived assets by geographic area as of December 31 of each of the past three years is summarized in the following table:

 

(dollars in millions)    2011      2010      2009  

United States

   $ 280.4       $ 243.8       $ 229.4   

Canada

     67.7         73.1         73.8   

England

     37.1         5.5         5.4   

France

     0.5         0.4         0.6   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total consolidated long-lived assets

   $ 385.7       $ 322.8       $ 309.2   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Exports

The Company’s exports consist primarily of titanium mill products, extrusions, and machined extrusions used in the aerospace markets. The Company’s export sales as a percentage of total net sales for each of the past three years was as follows:

 

       2011         2010         2009    

Export sales

     34     34     36

 

5


Table of Contents

Such sales were made primarily to Europe, where the Company is a leader in supplying flat-rolled titanium alloy mill products. Most of the Company’s export sales are denominated in U.S. Dollars. For further information about geographic areas, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Backlog

The Company’s order backlog for all markets was approximately $476 million as of December 31, 2011, as compared to $347 million at December 31, 2010. Of the backlog at December 31, 2011, approximately $409 million is likely to be realized in 2012. The Company defines backlog as firm business scheduled for release into the production process for a specific delivery date. The Company has numerous contracts that extend multiple years, including the Airbus, JSF, and Boeing 787 Dreamliner® long-term supply agreements, which are not included in backlog until a specific release into production or a firm delivery date has been established.

Raw Materials

The principal raw materials used in the production of titanium mill products are titanium sponge (a porous metallic material, so called due to its appearance), titanium scrap, and various alloying agents. The Company sources its raw materials from a number of domestic and foreign titanium suppliers under long-term contracts and other negotiated transactions. Currently, all of the Company’s titanium sponge requirements are sourced from foreign suppliers. Requirements for titanium sponge, scrap, alloys, and other metallics vary depending upon the volume and mix of final products. The Company’s cold-hearth melting process provides it with the flexibility to consume a wider range of metallics, thereby reducing its need for purchased titanium sponge.

The Company currently has supply agreements in place for certain critical raw materials. These supply agreements are with suppliers located in, or for products produced in, Japan, Kazakhstan, and the United States, and allow the Company to purchase certain quantities of raw materials at either annually negotiated prices or, in some cases, fixed prices that may be subject to certain underlying input cost adjustments. Purchases made under these contracts are denominated in U.S. Dollars; however, in some cases, the contract provisions include potential price adjustments based on the extent that the Yen to U.S. Dollar exchange rate falls outside of a specified range. These contracts expire at various periods through 2021. The Company purchases the balance of its raw materials opportunistically on the spot market as needed. The Company believes it has adequate sources of supply for titanium sponge, titanium scrap, alloying agents, and other raw materials to meet its short and medium-term needs.

Business units in the Fabrication and Distribution Groups obtain the majority of their titanium mill product requirements from the Titanium Group. Other metallic requirements are generally sourced from the best available supplier at competitive market prices.

Competition and Other Market Factors

The titanium metals industry is a highly-competitive and cyclical global business. Titanium competes with other materials, including certain stainless steel, other nickel-based high-temperature and corrosion resistant alloys, and composites. A metal manufacturing company with rolling and finishing facilities could participate in the mill product segment of the industry, although it would either need to acquire intermediate product from an existing source or further integrate to include vacuum melting and forging operations to provide the starting stock for further rolling. In addition, many end-use applications, especially in the aerospace industry, require rigorous testing, approvals, and customer certification prior to purchase, which requires a manufacturer to expend a significant investment of time and capital coupled with extensive technical expertise, given the complexity of the specifications often required by customers.

 

6


Table of Contents

The aerospace consumers of titanium products tend to be very large and highly concentrated. Boeing, Airbus, Lockheed Martin, Bombardier, and Embraer manufacture airframes. General Electric, Pratt & Whitney, Rolls Royce, and Snecma build jet engines. Direct purchases by these companies, and their family of specialty subcontractors, account for a majority of aerospace products manufactured for large commercial aerospace and defense applications.

Producers of titanium mill products are located primarily in the U.S., Japan, Russia, Europe, and China. The Company participates directly in the titanium mill product business primarily through its Titanium Group. The Company’s principal competitors in the aerospace titanium mill product market are Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (“ATI”) and Titanium Metals Corp. (“TIE”), both based in the United States, and Verkhnaya Salda Metallurgical Production Organization (RU: “VSMO”), based in Russia. TIE and certain Japanese producers are the Company’s principal competitors in the industrial and consumer markets. The Company competes with these companies primarily on the basis of price, quality of products, technical support, and the availability of products to meet customers’ delivery schedules.

The Fabrication and Distribution Groups compete with other companies primarily on the basis of price, quality, timely delivery, and customer service. The Company’s principal competitors in the aerospace titanium fabricated component market are GKN Aerospace PLC (LSE: “GKN”), Triumph Group Inc. (“TRI”), LMI Aerospace (“LMIA”), and Ducommun Inc. (“DCO”). The Company believes that the business units in its Fabrication and Distribution Groups are well-positioned to continue to compete and grow due to the range of goods and services offered, their demonstrated expertise, and the increasing synergy with the Titanium Group for product and technical support.

Trade and Legislative Factors

Imports of titanium mill products from countries that receive the normal trade relations (“NTR”) tariff rate are subject to a 15% tariff. The tariff rate applicable to imports from countries that do not receive NTR treatment is 45%. A 15% tariff exists on unwrought titanium products entering the U.S., including titanium sponge. Currently, the Company imports titanium sponge from Kazakhstan and Japan, which is subject to this 15% tariff. Competitors of the Company that do not rely on imported titanium sponge are not subject to the additional 15% tariff in the cost of their products. In the past, the Company has sought relief from this tariff through the Offices of the U.S. Trade Representative but has been unsuccessful in having the tariff removed. The Company believes the U.S. trade laws as currently applied to the domestic titanium industry create a competitive disadvantage to the Company.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”) administers a duty drawback program whereby duty paid on imported items can be recovered. In the event materials on which duty has been paid are used in the manufacture of products in the United States and such manufactured products are then exported, duties paid may be refunded as drawbacks provided various requirements are met. The Company participates in the U.S. Customs’ duty drawback program.

The United States Government is required by 10 U.S.C. §2533b, “Requirement to buy strategic materials critical to national security from American sources” (the “Specialty Metals Clause”), to use domestically-melted titanium for certain military applications. The law, which dates back to the Berry Amendment of 1973, is important to the Company in that it supports the domestic specialty metals industry. Although the Specialty Metals Clause was comprehensively revised in the 2007 Defense Authorization Act (the “2007 Act”), the subject was reopened in the 2007-2008 legislative session as a result of universal dissatisfaction with the implementation of the 2007 Act by the Department of Defense. Consequently, new provisions under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (“2008 Act”) reflect a compromise on domestic source requirements for specialty metals.

 

7


Table of Contents

The 2008 Act provided an important clarification for the specialty metals industry, in that it affirmed that the Specialty Metals Clause does apply to commercial off-the-shelf-items such as: specialty metals mill products like titanium bar, billet, slab, and sheet; forgings and castings of specialty metals (unless incorporated into a commercial off-the-shelf item or subassembly); and fasteners (unless incorporated into commercial off-the-shelf end items or subassemblies). The 2008 Act does provide for a de minimis exception whereby defense agencies may accept an item containing up to 2% noncompliant metal, based on the total weight of all of the specialty metals in an item. This exception might apply, for example, to small specialty metal parts in a jet engine if the source of the parts cannot be ascertained. Finally, the 2008 Act revised the rules for granting compliance waivers when compliant materials are not available such that the Department of Defense must reexamine previously granted waivers (which the specialty metals industry had challenged as overly broad) and amend them, if necessary, to comply with the 2008 Act. The 2008 Act also required greater “transparency” in the use of the waiver process and required the Department of Defense to report to Congress on the first and second anniversaries of the legislation concerning the types of items that are being procured under the new commercial off-the-shelf exception.

The Company believes that the compromises contained in the 2008 Act provide a fair and workable solution bridging the biggest concerns on both sides of the debate. The Company, together with the specialty metals industry as a whole, is closely monitoring the application and enforcement of the 2008 Act to affirm that the Specialty Metals Clause continues to ensure a reliable, domestic source of supply for products that are critical to national security.

Environmental Liabilities

The Company is subject to various environmental laws and regulations as well as certain health and safety laws and regulations that are subject to frequent modifications and revisions. While historically the cost of compliance for these matters has not had a material adverse impact on the Company, it is not possible to accurately predict the ultimate effect these changing laws and regulations may have on the Company in the future. The Company continues to evaluate its obligations for environmental-related costs on a quarterly basis and make adjustments as necessary. For further information on the Company’s environmental liabilities, see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Marketing and Distribution

The Company markets its titanium mill and related products and services worldwide. The majority of the Company’s sales are made through its own sales force. The Company’s sales force has offices in Niles, Ohio; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Houston, Texas; Garden Grove, California; St. Louis and Washington, Missouri; Windsor, Connecticut; Tamworth and Welwyn Garden City, England; and Laval, Canada. Technical Marketing personnel are available to service these offices. Customer support for new product applications and development is provided by the Company’s Customer Technical Service personnel at each business unit, as well as at the corporate-level through the Company’s Technical Business Development and Research and Development organizations located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and Niles, Ohio, respectively. Sales of the Fabrication and Distribution Groups’ products and services are made by our corporate-level sales force and personnel at each location.

Research, Technical, and Product Development

The Company conducts research, technical, and product development activities for both the Titanium Group and the Fabrication Group. Research includes not only new product development, but also new or improved technical and manufacturing processes.

The principal goals of the Company’s research programs are advancing technical expertise in the production of titanium mill and fabricated products, and developing innovative solutions to customer needs through new and

 

8


Table of Contents

improved mill and value-added products. The Company’s research, technical, and product development expenses for each of the past three years were as follows:

 

       2011          2010          2009    
(in millions)                     

Research, technical and product development expenses

   $ 3.4       $ 3.3       $ 2.0   

Patents and Trademarks

The Company possesses a substantial body of technical know-how and trade secrets. The Company considers its expertise, trade secrets and patent portfolio to be important to the conduct of its business, although no individual item is currently considered to be material to either the Company’s business as a whole or to an individual reporting segment. The Company’s Titanium Group holds eight patents covering various manufacturing processes, most of which have not yet been commercialized. The Company’s Fabrication Group holds seven patents related to its energy business. With the exception of one patent expiring in 2013, all of the Company’s patents have been issued between 2000 and 2011.

Employees

At December 31, 2011, the Company and its subsidiaries had 1,729 employees, 718 of whom were classified as administrative and sales personnel. Of the total number of employees, 689 employees were in the Titanium Group, 818 in the Fabrication Group, 152 in the Distribution Group, and 70 in RTI Corporate. The acquisition of Remmele in February 2012 added 503 employees.

The United Steelworkers of America (“USW”) represents 343 of the hourly, clerical and technical employees at the Company’s plant in Niles, Ohio. The current Labor Agreement with the USW is set to expire on June 30, 2013. Hourly employees at the Company’s facility in Washington, Missouri are represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (“IAMAW”). There are 170 employees in the bargaining unit. The current labor contract with the IAMAW expires on February 19, 2015. No other Company employees are currently represented by a union.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Listed below are the executive officers of the Company, together with their ages and titles as of December 31, 2011.

 

Name

 

Age

 

Title

Dawne S. Hickton

  54   Vice Chair, President and Chief Executive Officer

James L. McCarley

  48   Executive Vice President of Operations

Stephen R. Giangiordano

  54   Executive Vice President of Technology and Innovation

William T. Hull

  54   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

William F. Strome

  56   Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration

Chad Whalen

  37   Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Biographies

Ms. Hickton was appointed Vice Chair, President and Chief Executive Officer in October 2009. She had served as Vice Chair and Chief Executive Officer since April 2007, Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since July 2005, Secretary since April 2004, and Vice President and General Counsel since June 1997. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Hickton had been an Assistant Professor of Law at The University of Pittsburgh School of Law, and was employed at U.S. Steel Corporation from 1983 through 1994.

 

9


Table of Contents

Mr. McCarley was appointed Executive Vice President of Operations in May 2010. He had served as the Chief Executive Officer of General Vortex Energy, Inc., which is a private developer of engine and combustion technologies, from September 2009 to May 2010. From 1987 to 2009, Mr. McCarley served in a variety of management roles at Wyman Gordon, a division of Precision Castparts Corporation, a global manufacturer of complex metal components, most recently as Division President of Wyman Gordon – West from 2008 to 2009 and Vice President & General Manager from 2006 to 2008.

Mr. Giangiordano was appointed Executive Vice President of Technology and Innovation in July 2008. He had served as Executive Vice President since April 2007, Senior Vice President, Titanium Group since October 2002 and Vice President, Titanium Group since July 1999. Prior to that assignment, he served as Senior Director, Technology since 1994.

Mr. Hull was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2007. He had served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since August 2005. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hull served as Corporate Controller of Stoneridge, Inc., of Warren, Ohio, where he was employed since 2000. Mr. Hull is a Certified Public Accountant.

Mr. Strome was appointed Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration in October 2009. He had served as Senior Vice President of Strategic Planning and Finance since November 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Strome served as a Principal focusing on environmental development projects at Laurel Mountain Partners, L.L.C. Prior to joining Laurel in 2006, Mr. Strome served as Senior Managing Director and Group Head, Diversified Industrials at the investment banking firm Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc. From 1981 to 2001, Mr. Strome was employed by PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. in various legal capacities and most recently managed PNC’s corporate finance advisory activities and its mergers and acquisitions services.

Mr. Whalen was appointed Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in February 2007. Mr. Whalen practiced corporate law at the law firm of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC from 1999 until joining the Company. He is an active member of The Society of Corporate Secretaries and Government Professionals and the Business Law Section of the American Bar Association.

Available Information

Our Internet address is www.rtiintl.com. We make available, free of charge through our website, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). All filings are available to be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, all filings are available via the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). We also make available on our website our corporate governance documents, including the Company’s Code of Business Ethics, governance guidelines, and the charters for various board committees.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors.

Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Any of these individual risks described below, or any number of these risks occurring simultaneously, could have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements, business or results of operations. You should carefully consider these factors, as well as the other information contained in this document, when evaluating your investment in our securities.

 

10


Table of Contents

We are subject to risks associated with global economic and political uncertainties.

Like other companies, we are susceptible to macroeconomic downturns in the United States and abroad that may affect our performance and the performance of our customers and suppliers. Further, the lingering effects of the global financial crisis may have an impact on our business and financial condition in ways that we currently cannot predict. The recent credit crisis and related turmoil in the global financial system has had and may continue to have an impact on our business and our financial condition. In addition to the impact that the global financial crisis has already had, we may face significant financial and operational challenges if conditions in the financial markets do not improve or if they worsen. For example, an extension of the credit crisis to other industries (for example, the availability of financing for the purchase of commercial aircraft) could adversely impact overall demand for our products, which could have a negative effect on our revenues.

In addition, our ability to access the traditional bank and capital markets may be severely restricted, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to react to changing economic and business conditions. In addition, we are subject to various domestic and international risks and uncertainties, including changing social conditions and uncertainties relating to the current and future political climate. Changes in policy resulting from the current political environment could have an adverse impact on the financial condition and the level of business activity of the defense industry or other market segments in which we participate. This may reduce our customers’ demand for our products and/or depress pricing of those products, resulting in a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, results of operations, revenues, and cash flows.

A substantial amount of revenue is derived from the commercial aerospace and defense industries and a limited number of customers.

More than 87% of our current annual revenue is derived from the commercial aerospace and defense industries. Of this amount, Boeing, through multiple contracts with various company subsidiaries covering varying periods, accounted for approximately 10% of our consolidated net sales in 2011. Within those industries are a relatively small number of consumers of titanium products. The commercial aerospace and defense industries have historically been highly cyclical, resulting in the potential for sudden and dramatic changes in expected production and spending that, as a partner in the supply chain, can negatively impact our operational plans and, ultimately, the demand for our products and services.

In addition, many of our customers are dependent on the commercial airline industry which has shown to be subject to significant economic and political challenges due to threats or acts of terrorism, rising or volatile fuel costs, pandemics, or other outbreaks of infectious diseases, aggressive competition, global economic slowdown, and other factors. Further, new aerospace and defense platforms under which we have a contract to supply our products may be subject to production delays which affect the timing of the delivery of our products for such platforms. Any one or combination of these factors could occur suddenly and result in a reduction or cancellation in orders of new airplanes and parts which could have an adverse impact on our business. Neither we nor our customers may be able to project or plan in a timely manner for the impact of these events.

Continued U.S. budget deficits could result in significant defense spending cuts and/or reductions in defense programs, including the JSF program.

Some of our customers are particularly sensitive to the level of government spending on defense-related products. Government programs are dependent upon the continued availability of appropriations, which are approved on an annual basis. Sudden reductions in defense spending could occur due to economic or political changes which could result in a downturn in demand for defense-related titanium products. Further, changes to existing defense procurement laws and regulations, such as the domestic preference for specialty metals, could adversely affect our results of operations.

A significant amount of our current capital spending and our forecasted revenue is associated with the JSF program. Continued record U.S. Federal budget deficits could result in significant pressure to reduce the annual

 

11


Table of Contents

defense budget, potentially including delays or cancellations of major defense programs. Significant delays in the ramp up of the JSF program, or a reduction in the total number of aircraft produced, could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.

A significant amount of our future revenue is based on long-term contracts for new aircraft programs.

We have signed several long-term contracts in recent years to produce titanium mill products and complex engineered assemblies for several new aircraft programs, including the Boeing 787, the JSF and the Airbus family of aircraft, including the A380, the A350XWB and the A400M military transport. In order to meet the delivery requirements of these contracts, we have invested in significant capital expansion projects. Because of the recent global economic slowdown and production problems experienced by many of our customers, we have experienced significant delays in these programs. Further delays, program cancellations, or a loss of one or more customers associated with these programs, could have a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, results of operations, revenues, cash flows, and financial standing.

Integrating acquisitions may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than expected, which may adversely affect our results and affect adversely the value of our stock following the merger.

We have entered into acquisitions that we believe will be beneficial to RTI and its shareholders. The success of the acquisitions will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated benefits from integrating the businesses. To realize these anticipated benefits, we must successfully integrate the businesses in an efficient and effective manner. If we are not able to achieve these objectives within the anticipated time frames, or at all, the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the acquisitions may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected, and our results of operations, financial position, and cash flow may be adversely affected.

Specifically, issues that must be addressed in integrating the acquisitions into our operations in order to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions include, among others:

 

   

integrating and optimizing the utilization of the properties and equipment of RTI and acquired businesses;

 

   

integrating the sales and information technology systems of RTI and the acquired businesses; and

 

   

conforming standards, controls, procedures and policies, business cultures and compensation structures between the companies.

Integration efforts will also divert management attention and resources. An inability to realize the full extent of the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, as well as any delays encountered in the integration process, could have an adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial position, and cash flow.

In addition, the actual integrations may result in additional and unforeseen expenses, and the anticipated benefits of the integrations may not be realized. Actual synergies, if achieved at all, may be lower than those expected and may take longer to achieve than anticipated. If we are not able to adequately address these challenges, we may be unable to successfully integrate the operations of the acquired businesses into ours, or to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions.

The carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets may not be recoverable.

As of December 31, 2011, we had goodwill of $55.9 million and other intangible assets of $22.6 million. Goodwill and other intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we review such assets at least annually for impairment. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in performance, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations, and a variety of other factors. The amount of any impairment is expensed immediately through the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Any future impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

12


Table of Contents

We are dependent on services that are subject to price and availability fluctuations.

We often depend on third parties to provide outside material processing services that may be critical to the manufacture of our products. Purchase prices and availability of these services are subject to volatility. At any given time, we may be unable to obtain these critical services on a timely basis, at acceptable prices, or on other acceptable terms, if at all. Further, if an outside processor is unable to produce to required specifications, our additional cost to cure may negatively impact our margins.

If we are unable to protect our data and process control systems against data corruption, cyber-based attacks, or network security breaches, we could experience disruption to our operations, the compromise or corruption of confidential information, and/or damage to our reputation, relationship with customers, or physical assets, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.

We have in place a number of systems, processes, and practices designed to protect against intentional or unintentional misappropriation or corruption of our systems and information or disruption of our operations due to a cyber incident. Despite such efforts, we could be subject to breaches of security systems which may result in unauthorized access, misappropriation, corruption, or disruption of the information we are trying to protect. Security breaches of our data or process control systems, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, attacks by hackers or similar breeches, can create system disruptions, shutdowns, or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. If we are unable to prevent such security or privacy breaches, our operations could be disrupted or we may suffer loss of reputation, financial loss, property damage, and other regulatory penalties because of lost or misappropriated information. Furthermore, our customers are increasingly imposing more stringent contractual obligations on us relating to our information security protections. If we are unable to maintain protections and processes at a level commensurate with that required by our large customers, it could negatively affect our relationships with those customers and harm our business.

Fluctuations in our income tax obligations and effective income tax rate may result in volatility of our earnings and stock price.

We are subject to income taxes in many U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions. Our effective income tax rate (calculated by application of generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”)) in a given financial statement period may be materially impacted by changes in the jurisdictional mix and level of earnings in the various jurisdictions in which we are subject to income taxes. As a result, there could be ongoing variability period to period in our income tax rates and reported net income.

We may be affected by our ability to expand successfully our operations in a timely and cost effective manner.

In connection with several of our long-term commercial contracts, we have undertaken several major capital expansion projects which are currently estimated to continue through 2012. Our inability to successfully complete these projects in a timely and cost-effective manner, or at all, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, our undertaking of these significant initiatives places a significant demand on management, financial, and operational resources. Our success in these projects will depend upon the ability of key financial and operational management to ensure the necessary internal and external resources are in place to properly complete and operate these facilities.

The demand for our products and services may be adversely affected by demand for our customers’ products and services.

Our business is substantially derived from titanium mill products and fabricated metal parts, which are primarily used by our customers as components in the manufacture of their products. The ability or inability to meet our financial and production expectations could be directly impacted by our customers’ abilities or inabilities to meet their own financial expectations. A continued downturn in demand for our customers’ products and services could occur for reasons beyond their control such as unforeseen spending constraints, competitive

 

13


Table of Contents

pressures, rising prices, the inability to contain costs, and other domestic as well as global economic, environmental, or political factors. A continued slowdown in demand by, or complete loss of business from, these customers could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position, including, but not limited to, impairment of goodwill, which could be material.

We may be subject to competitive pressures.

The titanium metals industry is highly-competitive on a worldwide basis. Our competitors are located primarily in the U.S., Japan, Russia, Europe, and China. Our Russian competitor, in particular, has significantly greater capacity than us and others in our industry. Not only do we face competition for a limited number of customers with other producers of titanium products, but we also must compete with producers of other generally less expensive materials of construction including stainless steel, nickel-based high temperature and corrosion resistant alloys, and composites.

Our competitors could experience more favorable operating conditions than us including lower raw materials costs, more favorable labor agreements, or other factors which could provide them with competitive cost advantages in their ability to provide goods and services. Changes in costs or other factors related to the production and supply of titanium mill products compared to costs or other factors related to the production and supply of other types of materials of construction may negatively impact our business and the industry as a whole. New competitive forces unknown to us today could also emerge which could have an adverse impact on our financial performance. Our foreign competitors in particular may have the ability to offer goods and services to our customers at more favorable prices due to advantageous economic, environmental, political, or other factors.

We may experience a lack of supply of raw materials at costs that provide us with acceptable margin levels.

The raw materials required for the production of titanium mill products (primarily titanium sponge and scrap) are acquired from a number of domestic and foreign suppliers. Although we have long-term contracts in place for the procurement of certain amounts of raw material, we cannot guarantee that our suppliers can fulfill their contractual obligations. Our suppliers may be adversely impacted by events within or outside of their control that may adversely affect our business operations. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain adequate amounts of raw materials from other suppliers in the event that our primary suppliers are unable to meet our needs. We may experience an increase in prices for raw materials which could have a negative impact on our profit margins if we are unable to adequately increase product pricing, and we may not be able to project the impact that an increase in costs may cause in a timely manner. We may be contractually obligated to supply products to our customers at price levels that do not result in our expected margins due to unanticipated increases in the costs of raw materials. We may experience dramatic increases in demand and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain adequate levels of raw materials at prices that are within acceptable cost parameters in order to fulfill that demand.

We are subject to changes in product pricing.

The titanium industry is highly cyclical. Consequently, excess supply and competition may periodically result in fluctuations in the prices at which we are able to sell certain products. Price reductions may have a negative impact on our operating results. In addition, our ability to implement price increases is dependent on market conditions, often beyond our control. Given the long manufacturing lead times for certain products, the realization of financial benefits from increased prices may be delayed.

We may experience a shortage in the supply of energy or an increase in energy costs to operate our plants.

We own twenty-seven natural gas wells which provide some but not all of the non-electrical energy required by our Niles, Ohio operations. Because our operations are reliant on energy sources from outside suppliers, we

 

14


Table of Contents

may experience significant increases in electricity and natural gas prices, unavailability of electrical power, natural gas, or other resources due to natural disasters, interruptions in energy supplies due to equipment failure or other causes, or the inability to extend expiring energy supply contracts on favorable economical terms.

We may not be able to recover the carrying value of our long-lived assets, which could require us to record asset impairment charges.

As of December 31, 2011, we had net property, plant, and equipment of $289.4 million. We operate in a highly-competitive and highly-cyclical industry. Furthermore, we have invested heavily in new machinery and facilities in order to win new long-term supply agreements related to next-generation aircraft such as the Boeing 787, the Airbus family of commercial aircraft, and the JSF program. If we were unable to realize the benefits under these agreements, for whatever reason, we could be required to record material asset and asset related impairment charges in future periods which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Many of our products are used in critical aircraft components.

Given the critical nature of many of the aerospace end uses for our products, including specifically their use in critical rotating parts of gas turbine engines, we maintain aircraft products liability insurance, including grounding liability, of $500 million. However, should a quality or warranty claim exceed this coverage, or should our coverage be denied, such liability could have a material adverse impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our business could be harmed by strikes or work stoppages.

Approximately 343 hourly, clerical, and technical employees at our Niles, Ohio facility are represented by the United Steelworkers of America. Our current labor agreement with this union expires June 30, 2013. Approximately 170 hourly employees at our RTI Tradco facility in Washington, Missouri are represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. Our current labor agreement with this union was approved on February 15, 2011 and expires February 19, 2015.

We cannot be certain that we will be able to negotiate new bargaining agreements upon expiration of the existing agreements on the same or more favorable terms as the current agreements, or at all, without production interruptions caused by a labor stoppage. If a strike or work stoppage were to occur in connection with the negotiation of a new collective bargaining agreement, or as a result of a dispute under our collective bargaining agreements with the labor unions, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our business is subject to the risks of international operations.

We operate subsidiaries and conduct business with suppliers and customers in foreign countries which exposes us to risks associated with international business activities. We could be significantly impacted by those risks, which include the potential for volatile economic and labor conditions, political instability, expropriation, and changes in taxes, tariffs, and other regulatory costs. We are also exposed to, and can be adversely affected by, fluctuations in the exchange rate of the U.S. Dollar against other foreign currencies, particularly the Canadian Dollar, the Euro, and the British Pound. Although we are operating primarily in countries with relatively stable economic and political climates, there can be no assurance that our business will not be adversely affected by those risks inherent to international operations.

Our success depends largely on our ability to attract and retain key personnel.

Much of our future success depends on the continued service and availability of skilled personnel, including members of our executive team, management, materials engineers and other technical specialists, and staff

 

15


Table of Contents

positions. The loss of key personnel could adversely affect our ability to perform until suitable replacements are found. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to successfully attract and retain key personnel.

The demand for our products and services may be affected by factors outside of our control.

War, terrorism, natural disasters, and public health issues including pandemics, whether in the U.S. or abroad, have caused and could cause damage or disruption to international commerce by creating economic and political uncertainties that may have a negative impact on the global economy as a whole. Our business operations, as well as our suppliers’ and customers’ business operations, are subject to interruption by those factors as well as other events beyond our control such as governmental regulations, fire, power shortages, and others. Although it is impossible to predict the occurrences or consequences of any such events, they could result in a decrease in demand for our products, make it difficult or impossible for us to deliver products to our customers or to receive materials from our suppliers, and create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain. Our operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected by these events.

We may be affected by our ability or inability to obtain financing.

Our ability to access the traditional bank or capital markets in the future for additional financing, if needed, and our future financial performance could be influenced by our ability to meet current covenant requirements associated with our existing credit agreement, our credit rating, or other factors.

The outcome of the U.S. Customs investigation of our previously filed duty drawback claims is uncertain.

During 2007, we received notice from U.S. Customs indicating that certain duty drawback claims previously filed by our agent, on our behalf, are under formal investigation. The investigation relates to discrepancies in, and lack of supporting documentation for, claims filed through our prior drawback broker. While the ultimate outcome of the U.S. Customs investigation cannot be determined, it could potentially have an adverse impact on our financial performance.

We are subject to, and could incur substantial costs and liabilities under environmental, health, and safety laws.

We own and/or operate a number of manufacturing and other facilities. Our operations and properties are subject to various laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and health and safety matters, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Some environmental laws can impose liability for all of the costs of a contaminated site without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct. We could incur substantial costs, including fines, penalties, civil and criminal sanctions, investigation and cleanup costs, natural resource damages and third-party claims for property damage or personal injury, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws and regulations or the environmental permits required for our operations. Many of our properties have a history of industrial operations, including the use and storage of hazardous materials, and we are involved in remedial actions relating to some of our current and former properties and, along with other responsible parties, third-party sites. We have established reserves for such matters where appropriate. The ultimate costs of cleanup, and our share of such costs, however, are difficult to accurately predict and could exceed current reserves. We also could incur significant additional costs at these or other sites if additional contamination is discovered, additional cleanup obligations are imposed and/or the participation or financial viability of other responsible parties changes in the future. In addition, while the cost of complying with environmental laws and regulations has not had a material adverse impact on our operations in the past, such laws and regulations are subject to frequent modifications and revisions, and more stringent compliance requirements, or more stringent interpretation or enforcement of existing requirements, may be imposed in the future on us or the industries in which we operate. As a result, we could incur significant additional costs complying with environmental laws and regulations in the future.

 

16


Table of Contents

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.    Properties.

Manufacturing Facilities

The Company has approximately 1.9 million square feet of manufacturing facilities, exclusive of distribution facilities and office space. Set forth below are the Company’s principal manufacturing plants, the principal products produced at each location as well as each plant’s aggregate capacities.

Facilities

 

Location

  Owned /
Leased
   

Products

  Annual  Rated
Capacity
 

Titanium Group

     

Niles, OH

    Owned      Ingot (million pounds)     30.0   

Niles, OH

    Owned      Mill products (million pounds)     22.0   

Canton, OH

    Owned      Ferro titanium and specialty alloys (million pounds)     16.0   

Hermitage, PA

    Owned      Metal processing (million pounds)     5.0   

Martinsville, VA

    Owned      Titanium forging (million pounds)     10.5   

Fabrication Group

     

Washington, MO

    Owned      Hot and superplastically formed parts (thousand press hours)     50.0   

Laval, Canada

    Owned      Machining/assembly of aerospace parts (thousand man hours)     400.0   

Houston, TX

    Leased      Extruded, hot stretch formed products (million pounds)     4.2   

Houston, TX

    Owned      Machining/fabricating oil/gas products (thousand man hours)     200.0   

Welwyn Garden City, England

    Leased      Hot and superplastically formed parts (thousand man hours)     60.0   

Distribution Group

     

Staffordshire, England

    Leased      Cut parts and components (thousand man hours)     45.0   

Rosny-Sur-Seine, France

    Leased      Cut parts and components (thousand man hours)     16.0   

Sullivan, MO

    Leased      Cut parts (thousand man hours)     23.0   

Garden Grove, CA

    Leased      Metal warehousing and distribution     N/A   

Windsor, CT

    Leased      Metal warehousing and distribution     N/A   

In addition to the leased facilities noted above, the Company leases certain buildings and property at the Washington, Missouri and Canton, Ohio operations, as well as our corporate headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. All other facilities are owned. The plants have been constructed at various times over a long period. Many of the buildings have been remodeled or expanded and additional buildings have been constructed from time to time.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. There are currently no material pending or threatened claims against the Company.

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

 

17


Table of Contents

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Range of High and Low Stock Prices of Common Stock

 

     2011      2010  

Quarter

   High      Low      High      Low  

First

   $ 31.71       $ 24.91       $ 32.77       $ 20.81   

Second

   $ 39.82       $ 28.07       $ 31.40       $ 21.60   

Third

   $ 38.96       $ 21.55       $ 32.39       $ 22.91   

Fourth

   $ 29.51       $ 20.07       $ 31.98       $ 26.34   

Principal market for Common Stock: New York Stock Exchange

Holders of record of Common Stock at January 31, 2012: 572

The Company has not paid dividends on its Common Stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The following table sets forth repurchases of our Common Stock during the three months ended December 31, 2011.

 

     Total Number of
Shares
Purchased(1)
     Average Price
Paid Per Share
     Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs(2)
     Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares
that May Yet
Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs
(in thousands)(3)
 

October 1 - 31, 2011

     458       $ 24.35               $ 2,973   

November 1 - 30, 2011

                             2,973   

December 1 - 31, 2011

                             2,973   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

     458       $ 24.35              
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

(1) Shares were repurchased under (i) the Company’s $15 million share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors on April 30, 1999, and (ii) a program that allows employees to surrender shares to the Company to pay tax liabilities associated with the vesting of restricted stock awards and the payout of performance share awards under the 2004 Stock Plan.
(2) Includes only shares reacquired under the Company’s $15 million share repurchase program.
(3) Amounts in this column reflect amounts remaining under the Company’s $15 million share repurchase program.

 

18


Table of Contents

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data.

The following table sets forth selected historical financial data and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes related hereto and other financial information included elsewhere herein.

The selected historical data was derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements (in thousands, except per share data).

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2011      2010      2009     2008      2007  

Income Statement data:

             

Net sales

   $ 529,679       $ 431,793       $ 407,978      $ 609,900       $ 626,799   

Operating income (loss)

     27,761         14,061         (87,276     87,392         141,161   

Income (loss) before income taxes

     12,135         11,820         (96,056     87,975         142,467   

Net income (loss)

     6,552         3,417         (67,239     55,695         92,631   

Basic earnings (loss) per share(1)

   $ 0.22       $ 0.11       $ (2.67   $ 2.42       $ 4.01   

Diluted earnings (loss) per share(1)

   $ 0.22       $ 0.11       $ (2.67   $ 2.41       $ 3.99   

 

    December 31,  
    2011      2010      2009      2008      2007  

Balance Sheet data:

             

Working capital

  $ 581,158       $ 636,656       $ 387,761       $ 559,601       $ 405,907   

Total assets

    1,132,938         1,106,854         854,735         1,029,203         755,284   

Long-term debt

    186,981         178,107         81         238,550         16,506   

Total shareholders’ equity

    722,752         718,400         679,206         601,934         575,784   

 

(1) Adjusted for retrospective application of the provisions of the earnings per share accounting guidance which became effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. For further information, see Note 4 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

19


Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

The following discussion should be read in connection with the information contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The following information contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is subject to the safe harbor created by that Act. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of words like “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations and assumptions regarding future events. In addition to factors discussed throughout this annual report, the following factors and risks should also be considered, including, without limitation:

 

   

global economic and political uncertainties,

 

   

a significant portion of our revenue is concentrated within the commercial aerospace and defense industries and the limited number of potential customers within those industries,

 

   

the future availability and prices of raw materials,

 

   

the historic cyclicality of the titanium and commercial aerospace industries,

 

   

changes in defense spending and cancellation or changes in defense programs or initiatives, including the Joint Strike Fighter program,

 

   

our ability to successfully integrate newly acquired businesses,

 

   

long-term supply agreements and the impact if another party to a long-term supply agreement fails to fulfill its requirements under existing contracts or successfully manage its future development and production schedule,

 

   

the impact of the current titanium inventory overhang throughout our supply chain,

 

   

our ability to recover the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets,

 

   

the impact of Boeing 787 Dreamliner® production delays,

 

   

competition in the titanium industry,

 

   

our ability to attract and retain key personnel,

 

   

the ability to obtain access to financial markets and to maintain current covenant requirements,

 

   

legislative challenges to the Specialty Metals Clause, which requires that titanium for U.S. defense programs be produced in the U.S.,

 

   

labor matters,

 

   

the successful completion of our expansion projects,

 

   

risks related to international operations,

 

   

our ability to execute on new business awards,

 

   

potential costs for violations of applicable environmental, health, and safety laws,

 

   

our order backlog and the conversion of that backlog into revenue,

 

   

fluctuations in our income tax obligations and effective income tax rate,

 

   

demand for our products, and

 

   

other statements contained herein that are not historical facts.

Because such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These and other risk factors are set forth in this filing, as well as in other filings filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) over the last 12 months, copies of which are available from the SEC or may be obtained upon request from the Company. Except as may be required by applicable law, we undertake no duty to update our forward-looking information.

 

20


Table of Contents

On November 23, 2011, RTI International Metals, Inc. (the “Company,” “RTI,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) through our wholly-owned subsidiary, RTI Europe Limited, acquired Aeromet Advanced Forming, a privately held company located in Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom, which became a wholly owned subsidiary of RTI and was renamed RTI Advanced Forming, Ltd. On February 13, 2012, we acquired REI Delaware Holding, Inc, which directly owns all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Remmele Engineering, Inc. and indirectly owns all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of REI Medical, Inc. Due to these acquisitions, additional risks and uncertainties may arise that could affect our financial performance and actual results and could cause actual results for fiscal 2012 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements included in this report or otherwise made by our management. Such risks, which are difficult to predict with a level of certainty and may be greater than expected, include, among others, risk associated with combining businesses and/or with assimilating acquired companies.

Overview

We are a leading producer and global supplier of advanced titanium mill products and a supplier of fabricated advanced titanium and specialty metal components for the international aerospace, defense, energy, and industrial and consumer markets. We conduct business in three segments.

The Titanium Group melts, processes, and produces a complete range of titanium mill products which are further processed by its customers for use in a variety of commercial aerospace, defense, medical, and industrial and consumer applications. With operations in Niles, Ohio; Canton, Ohio; Martinsville, Virginia; and Hermitage, Pennsylvania, the Titanium Group has overall responsibility for the production of primary mill products including, but not limited to, bloom, billet, sheet, and plate. In addition, the Titanium Group produces ferro titanium alloys for its steel-making customers. The Titanium Group also focuses on the research and development of evolving technologies relating to raw materials, melting and other production processes, and the application of titanium in new markets.

The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant hard-metal expertise that extrude, form, fabricate, machine, micro machine, and assemble titanium, aluminum, and other specialty metal parts and components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered parts and assemblies, serve the commercial aerospace, defense, medical device, oil and gas, power generation, and chemical process industries, as well as a number of other industrial and consumer markets. With operations located in Minneapolis, Minnesota; Houston, Texas; Washington, Missouri; Laval, Canada; and Welwyn Garden City, England; the Fabrication Group provides value-added products and services such as engineered tubulars and extrusions, fabricated and machined components and sub-assemblies, as well as engineered systems for deepwater oil and gas exploration and production infrastructure. Additionally, the Group produces components for the production of minimally invasive and implantable medical devices.

The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes, cuts-to-size, and facilitates just-in-time delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys. With operations in Garden Grove, California; Windsor, Connecticut; Sullivan, Missouri; Tamworth, England; and Rosny-Sur-Seine, France; the Distribution Group services a wide variety of commercial aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer customers.

Both the Fabrication and Distribution Groups access the Titanium Group as their primary source of titanium mill products. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 approximately 49%, 38%, and 53%, respectively, of the Titanium Group’s sales were to the Fabrication and Distribution Groups. The increase in sales to the Fabrication and Distribution Groups in 2011 was primarily due to strengthening demand from the commercial aerospace and defense industries for the Distribution Group’s titanium products, increasing its demand for mill products from the Titanium Group.

 

21


Table of Contents

Trends and Uncertainties

We believe that overall end-market demand continues to accelerate, notwithstanding the headwinds in the defense sector. This demand is being driven largely by the commercial aircraft build rate increases announced by Airbus and Boeing, as well as strong jet engine market activity, both of which are contributing to the increasing order activity in our titanium mill product business. Additionally, we continue to win incremental value-added packages in validation of our strategy to move further up the value chain. We believe that our recent acquisitions will further this move towards becoming an integrated supplier of advanced titanium products to our customers.

In the near-tem, we will be impacted by increasing titanium sponge prices as the underlying raw material input costs increase reflecting current supply versus demand imbalances. In the medium to long-term, we expect these costs to moderate as supply catches up with demand.

Executive Summary

The years 2011 and early 2012 saw developments which should bode well for the future of RTI. With the acquisition of Aeromet’s titanium forming division, we expanded our hot-forming fabrication capabilities beyond the defense sector and into commercial aerospace. Our Martinsville forging facility became operational during 2011. Once fully certified, this facility will provide us with the additional capacity needed to grow the mill product side of our business. Additionally, we signed an agreement with MTU Aero Engines for the supply of rotor grade titanium and began construction on our new electron beam furnace during the year as we look to take further advantage of opportunities presented to us within the engine market.

And further still, we announced early in 2012, and closed on February 13, 2012, the acquisition of Remmele Engineering in order to broaden the scope of our machining services and gain entry into the fast-growing medical devices market.

Results of Operations

For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2010

Net Sales.    Net sales for our reportable segments, excluding intersegment sales, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is summarized in the following table:

 

     Years Ended
December 31,
     $  Increase/
(Decrease)
     %  Increase/
(Decrease)
 
(Dollars in millions)    2011      2010        

Titanium Group

   $ 160.7       $ 142.9       $ 17.8         12.5

Fabrication Group

     150.5         134.4         16.1         12.0

Distribution Group

     218.5         154.5         64.0         41.4
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total consolidated net sales

   $ 529.7       $ 431.8       $ 97.9         22.7
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Excluding the $15.4 million payment recognized in the prior year related to the resolution of Airbus’ 2009 contractual obligations, the Titanium Group’s net sales increased $33.2 million. This increase was primarily the result of an increase in prime mill product shipments to trade customers to 7.7 million pounds in 2011 from 6.6 million pounds in 2010, coupled with an increase in average realized selling prices to $17.53 per pound in 2011 compared to $16.05 per pound in 2010. The increasing build rates by both Boeing and Airbus drove the increased mill product volume. The primary driver for the increase in average realized selling prices was that the 2011 mix combined a higher percentage of flat products which generally carry higher overall prices relative to forged products. Additionally, ferro-alloy net sales increased by $3.5 million due to higher demand from our specialty steel customers.

 

22


Table of Contents

Excluding the $4.2 million of nonrecurring engineering funds recognized in the prior year related to the Boeing 787 Dreamliner® program, the Fabrication Group’s net sales increased $20.3 million. This increase was principally due to increased demand in the commercial aerospace market, led by the Boeing 787 Dreamliner® program, which increased net sales by $24.7 million. Additionally, net sales to our military customers increased $4.7 million due to strong demand from the F-15, F-18, and various helicopter programs. The Fabrication Group also benefited from the acquisition of RTI Advanced Forming, Ltd. in the November 2011 which increased net sales by $2.1 million. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in sales to our energy market customers of $11.2 million, principally due to the slowdown in drilling permitting in the Gulf of Mexico during the current year and the delivery of several engineered components supporting the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.

The increase in the Distribution Group’s net sales was primarily the result of higher sales volumes, driven by increased demand for our titanium products, primarily in the commercial aerospace market, as well as higher demand for our specialty metals products. These volume improvements resulted in a $69.7 million improvement in net sales. The increase in volumes was offset by a $5.7 million reduction in net sales due to decreases in average realized selling prices.

Gross Profit.    Gross profit for our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is summarized in the following table:

 

     Years Ended
December 31,
    $ Increase/
(Decrease)
    % Increase/
(Decrease)
 
     2011     2010      
(Dollars in millions)    $      % of
Sales
    $      % of
Sales
     

Titanium Group

   $ 48.5         30.2   $ 30.8         21.6   $ 17.7        57.5

Fabrication Group

     17.9         11.9     20.4         15.2     (2.5     (12.3 )% 

Distribution Group

     34.3         15.7     24.7         16.0     9.6        38.9
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consolidated gross profit

   $ 100.7         19.0   $ 75.9         17.6   $ 24.8        32.7
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Excluding the $15.4 million payment recognized in the prior year related to the resolution of Airbus’s 2009 contractual obligations and the $8.3 million charge in the prior year associated with the disputed Tronox supply contract, the Titanium Group’s gross profit increased $24.8 million. The increase in the Titanium Group’s gross profit was primarily due to its ability to control its production costs, as average cost per pound rose to $13.98 per pound in 2011 from $13.45 per pound in 2010, or 3.9%, while average selling price per pound rose 9.2%. Higher volume and a favorable mix helped offset raw material cost pressures during the year. Furthermore, the Titanium Group was favorably impacted $0.8 million due to increased ferro-alloy sales to our specialty steel customers. These increases were partially offset by a reduction in third-party sales of Titanium Group-sourced inventory through our Fabrication and Distribution Group facilities.

Our primary raw materials in the production of titanium are titanium sponge and titanium scrap. During recent years, the cost of titanium sponge has been relatively stable; however, due to shortages of rutile ore and other input costs, we currently expect that our overall raw material costs will increase in the range of 8.5% to 9.5% in 2012. We currently expect we will be able to pass a portion of this increase on to our customers. Titanium scrap has increased significantly in price over the last year; however, since we revert virtually all of our internally generated scrap back into our melting process and purchased scrap is not currently a significant part of our raw material strategy, this increase has not had, nor is it currently forecasted to have, a significant impact on our cost of goods sold in the future.

The decrease in gross profit for the Fabrication Group was primarily driven by a reduction in sales to our energy market customers, principally due to material delivery delays by our suppliers, the slowdown in permitting in the Gulf of Mexico, and the delivery of several engineered components supporting the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in the prior year, which combined to reduce gross profit by $11.2 million.

 

23


Table of Contents

The decrease was partially offset by improved production efficiencies and delivery performance, resulting in an $8.4 million improvement as Fabrication Group deliveries related to the Boeing 787 Dreamliner® Pi Box program continued to slowly ramp up.

The increase in the Distribution Group’s gross profit was principally related to increased sales volume, which increased gross profit $13.5 million, primarily driven by higher customer demand in the commercial aerospace market. This increase was partially offset by a lower margin sales mix in the current period, which decreased gross profit $2.4 million, and higher operating expenses, which decreased gross profit $1.6 million.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) for our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is summarized in the following table:

 

     Years Ended
December 31,
    $ Increase/
(Decrease)
     % Increase/
(Decrease)
 
     2011     2010       
(Dollars in millions)    $      % of
Sales
    $      % of
Sales
      

Titanium Group

   $ 17.8         11.1   $ 14.1         9.9   $ 3.7         26.2

Fabrication Group

     28.9         19.2     28.0         20.8     0.9         3.2

Distribution Group

     24.3         11.1     21.5         13.9     2.8         13.0
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total consolidated SG&A

   $ 71.0         13.4   $ 63.6         14.7   $ 7.4         11.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

The decrease in SG&A as a percent of sales is primarily due to the leverage gained through the increase in sales, partially offset by increases in salary, benefit, and incentive-related expenses of $5.3 million driven by increases in our cash incentive compensation program, and acquisition-related expenses of $2.1 million.

Research, Technical, and Product Development Expenses.    Research, technical, and product development expenses for the Company were $3.4 million and $3.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This spending, primarily related to our Titanium Group and Fabrication Group, reflects the Company’s continued efforts to develop advanced titanium products as well as to make productivity and quality improvements to current manufacturing processes.

Asset and Asset-related Charges (Income).    Asset and asset-related charges (income) for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $(1.5) million and $(5.0) million, respectively. Asset and asset-related charges (income) consisted of favorable settlements related to the accrued contractual commitments associated with our cancelled titanium sponge plant, offset in part by the write-down of sponge plant-related assets related to these settlements as our contractors were able to return these assets to their vendors for refunds.

Operating Income (Loss).    Operating income (loss) for our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is summarized in the following table:

 

     Years Ended
December 31,
    $ Increase/
(Decrease)
    % Increase/
(Decrease)
 
     2011     2010      
(Dollars in millions)    $     % of
Sales
    $     % of
Sales
     

Titanium Group

   $ 29.0        18.0   $ 18.4        12.9   $ 10.6        57.6

Fabrication Group

     (11.2     (7.4 )%      (7.6     (5.7 )%      (3.6     (47.4 )% 

Distribution Group

     10.0        4.6     3.3        2.1     6.7        203.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consolidated operating income

   $ 27.8        5.2   $ 14.1        3.3   $ 13.7        97.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

24


Table of Contents

Excluding the $15.4 million payment recognized in the prior year related to the resolution of Airbus’s 2009 contractual obligations and the $8.3 million charge in the prior year associated with the disputed Tronox supply contract, the Titanium Group’s operating income increased $17.7 million. The increase was primarily due to higher gross profit, largely due to higher volumes and higher average realized selling prices, which were partially offset by increased SG&A expenses.

The increase in the Fabrication Group’s operating loss was primarily attributable to a reduction in sales to our energy market customers, principally due to material delivery delays by our suppliers, the slowdown in permitting in the Gulf of Mexico, and delivery of several engineered components supporting the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. Operating income at the Fabrication Group was further impacted by an increase in SG&A related to higher salary, benefit, and incentive-related expenses.

The increase in the Distribution Group’s operating income was principally attributable to higher gross profit due to increased sales, which were primarily driven by higher customer demand in the commercial aerospace market, partially offset by an increase in SG&A expenses in the current year.

Other Income (Expense).    Other income (expense) for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was not material. Other income (expense) consists primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses from our international operations.

Interest Income and Interest Expense.    Interest income for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $1.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The increase was principally related to higher average cash and investment balances in the current year compared to the prior year.

Interest expense was $16.8 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Changes in our effective interest rate between the periods were primarily attributable to the duration for which we had debt outstanding during each year as we issued $230 million aggregate principal amount of 3.0% Convertible Senior Notes due December 2015 (the “Notes”) on December 14, 2010. Interest on the Notes is being recorded using the Interest Method. As the time of issuance, we determined a similar straight-rate debt instrument had an interest rate of 8.675%. As a result, during the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded interest expense of $0.7 million, including debt discount amortization of $0.4 million and amortization of debt issuance costs of $0.1 million associated with the Notes. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2011 included $8.9 million of debt discount amortization and amortization of debt issuance costs of $1.1 million associated with the Notes.

Provision for (Benefit from) Income Tax.    We recognized income tax expense of $5.6 million, or 46.0% of pretax income, in 2011 compared to income tax expense of $8.4 million, or 71.1% of pretax income, in 2010 for federal, state, and foreign income taxes. Our effective income tax rate decreased 25.1 percentage points from 2010, principally due to the effects of foreign operations, state tax effects, and certain items present in 2010 that did not reoccur in 2011.

The effects of foreign operations, which includes the impact of lower foreign statutory tax rates, certain statutory allowances, foreign exchange rate movements, and a modest amount of US foreign tax credits, accounted for 24.2 percentage points of the decrease. State tax effects, reflecting changes in the mix of domestic income, normal revisions to state apportionment factors, and favorable adjustments to prior year tax expense upon filing the 2010 state tax returns contributed to another 16.8 percentage point reduction. Tax reserve adjustments and the repeal of the Medicare subsidy in 2010 contributed a 9.2 percentage point increase. Nondeductible acquisition costs and officer’s compensation increased the year-over-year rate by another 5.6 percentage points.

 

25


Table of Contents

Reconciliation of the 2010 effective income tax rate to the 2011 effective income tax rate:

 

2010 effective income tax rate

       71.1

Changes in effective income tax rate:

    

Effects of foreign operations

     (24.2  

State taxes

     (16.8  

Tax reserves/law changes

     9.2     

Non-deductible acquisition costs/officer compensation

     5.6     

Other

     1.1        (25.1
    

 

 

 

2011 effective income tax rate

       46.0
    

 

 

 

Refer to Note 5 to our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for a reconciliation between our effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate.

For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

Net Sales.    Net sales for our reportable segments, excluding intersegment sales, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is summarized in the following table:

 

     Years Ended
December 31,
     $  Increase/
(Decrease)
    %  Increase/
(Decrease)
 
(Dollars in millions)    2010      2009       

Titanium Group

   $ 142.9       $ 107.6       $ 35.3        32.8

Fabrication Group

     134.4         106.2         28.2        26.6

Distribution Group

     154.5         194.2         (39.7     (20.4 )% 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consolidated net sales

   $ 431.8       $ 408.0       $ 23.8        5.8
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Excluding the $15.4 million payment related to the resolution of Airbus’ 2009 contractual obligations, the Titanium Group’s net sales were favorable by $19.9 million. An increase of 54% in shipments of prime mill products to our trade customers, offset by a 27% decrease in the average realized selling prices of prime mill products, resulted in an $11.9 million increase in the Titanium Group’s net sales. The decrease in average realized selling prices was primarily due to changes in the sales mix between periods, with the mix in 2010 consisting of a higher percentage of forged products which generally carry lower overall sales prices than flat products. Increased demand from the specialty steel industry resulted in an $8.0 million increase in ferro-alloy product sales.

Excluding the $4.2 million of nonrecurring engineering funds received related to the Boeing 787 Dreamliner® program that were previously paid by the customer, the Fabrication Group’s net sales increased $24.0 million compared to 2009. The nonrecurring engineering funds were received to offset certain agreed upon tooling expenses to support the Boeing 787 Dreamliner® program. A corresponding amount was recorded in cost of sales during the current year. The increase in the Fabrication Group’s net sales was principally the result of a $29.6 million increase in commercial aerospace sales, primarily driven by the Boeing 787 Dreamliner® Pi Box program ramp-up as well as other Boeing programs. Additionally, the Company completed several engineered components to support the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. These favorable impacts were partially offset by a decline in our military shipments as the F-22, C-17, and other programs continued to wind down.

The decrease in the Distribution Group’s net sales was principally driven by lower demand due to high levels of titanium inventory throughout the supply chain, which was a result of the slowdown in the commercial and military aircraft markets. The Group’s titanium products net sales were $44.9 million lower than 2009, while net sales for the Group’s specialty alloys products increased $5.2 million.

 

26


Table of Contents

Gross Profit.    Gross profit for our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is summarized in the following table:

 

     Years Ended
December 31,
     $  Increase/
(Decrease)
    %  Increase/
(Decrease)
 
(Dollars in millions)    2010      2009       

Titanium Group

   $ 30.8       $ 20.6       $ 10.2        49.5

Fabrication Group

     20.4         5.2         15.2        292.3

Distribution Group

     24.7         30.0         (5.3     (17.7 )% 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consolidated gross profit

   $ 75.9       $ 55.8       $ 20.1        36.0
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Excluding the $15.4 million payment related to the resolution of Airbus’ 2009 contractual obligations and the $4.2 million charge in 2009 associated with the U.S. Customs investigation of our previously-filed duty drawback claims, the Titanium Group’s gross profit decreased $9.4 million. Lower average realized selling prices and a lower margin sales mix reduced gross profit by $33.3 million. Additionally, the Titanium Group’s gross profit in 2010 was unfavorably impacted by an $8.3 million accrual associated with the disputed Tronox supply contract, and $0.6 million due to reduced third-party sales of Titanium Group-sourced inventory through our Fabrication and Distribution Group facilities. These decreases were partially offset` by lower raw material costs and increased overhead absorption, which increased gross profit $30.0 million, and higher sales volumes, which increased gross profit $1.1 million. Furthermore, gross profit at the Titanium Group was favorably impacted $1.7 million due to increased ferro-alloy business.

The increase in gross profit for the Fabrication Group was primarily driven by the completion of several engineered components to support the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, increasing gross profit by $10.5 million. In addition, improved volume, led by the ramp-up of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner® Pi Box program, increased gross profit by $7.8 million. However, these favorable impacts were partially offset by production inefficiencies, scrap, and yield costs associated with the production ramp-up of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner® Pi Box program as well as the volume impact of the winding down certain military programs such as the F-22 and C-17.

The decrease in the Distribution Group’s gross profit was primarily related to lower titanium sales levels in the commercial and military aircraft markets, somewhat offset with a modest increase in realized selling prices for certain specialty metals in the Group’s non-Titanium facilities.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) for our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is summarized in the following table:

 

     Years Ended
December 31,
     $  Increase/
(Decrease)
    %  Increase/
(Decrease)
 
(Dollars in millions)    2010      2009       

Titanium Group

   $ 14.1       $ 17.8       $ (3.7     (20.8 )% 

Fabrication Group

     28.0         22.8         5.2        22.8

Distribution Group

     21.5         22.9         (1.4     (6.1 )% 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consolidated SG&A

   $ 63.6       $ 63.5       $ 0.1        0.2
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The $0.1 million increase in SG&A was primarily related to a $6.9 million increase in salary, benefit, and incentive related expenses, driven by the reinstatement of our cash incentive compensation program in 2010 offset by targeted workforce reductions performed throughout 2009, which were fully realized in 2010, and our continued focus on reducing professional and consulting expenses.

 

27


Table of Contents

Research, Technical, and Product Development Expenses.    Research, technical, and product development expenses for the Company were $3.3 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This spending, primarily related to our Titanium Group, reflects the Company’s continued efforts to make productivity and quality improvements to current manufacturing processes.

Asset and Asset-related Charges (Income).    Asset and asset-related charges (income) for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $(5.0) million. In 2010, asset and asset-related charges (income) consisted of favorable settlements related to the accrued contractual commitments associated with our cancelled titanium sponge plant, offset in part by the write-down of sponge plant-related assets related to these settlements as our contractors were able to return these assets to their vendors for refunds. In 2009, asset and asset related charges (income) consisted of a $68.9 million impairment charge related to the indefinite delay of the construction of our titanium sponge plant.

Operating Income (Loss).    Operating income (loss) for our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is summarized in the following table:

 

     Years Ended
December 31,
    $  Increase/
(Decrease)
    %  Increase/
(Decrease)
 
(Dollars in millions)    2010     2009      

Titanium Group

   $ 18.4      $ (68.1   $ 86.5        127.0

Fabrication Group

     (7.6     (26.3     18.7        71.1

Distribution Group

     3.3        7.1        (3.8     (53.5 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consolidated operating income (loss)

   $ 14.1      $ (87.3   $ 101.4        (116.2 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Excluding the $15.4 million payment related to the resolution of Airbus’ 2009 contractual obligations, the 2009 $68.9 million asset-related impairment related to the indefinite delay of construction of the Company’s titanium sponge plant, and the $4.2 million charge in 2009 associated with the U.S. Customs investigation of our previously filed duty drawback claims, operating income for the Titanium Group decreased $2.0 million. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower gross profit, largely due to a lower margin sales mix and lower average realized selling prices, which were partially offset by higher volume and a reduction in SG&A expenses.

Excluding the $8.7 million goodwill impairment at the Fabrication Group’s Energy Fabrication reporting unit in 2009, the operating loss for the Fabrication Group decreased $10.0 million. The decrease was primarily driven by the completion of several engineered components to support the containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. However, these favorable impacts were partially offset by production inefficiencies, scrap, and yield costs associated with the production ramp-up of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner® Pi Box program as well as the winding down of several military programs and higher SG&A expenses during 2010.

The decrease in operating income for the Distribution Group was primarily related to lower titanium sales levels in the commercial and military aircraft markets, somewhat offset with a modest increase in realized selling prices for certain specialty metals in the Group’s non-Titanium facilities and a reduction in SG&A expenses.

Other Income (Expense).    Other income (expense) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $(0.6) million and $2.1 million, respectively. Other income (expense) consists primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses from our international operations and fair value adjustments related to our foreign currency forward contracts. We had no outstanding foreign currency forward contracts at December 31, 2010.

Interest Income and Interest Expense.    Interest income for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $0.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively. The decrease was principally related to lower returns on invested cash, as well as lower average cash balances, compared to the prior year period. Interest expense was $2.1 million and $12.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributable to the duration for which we had debt outstanding during each year.

 

28


Table of Contents

We issued $230 million of convertible notes in December 2010, whereas in September of 2009, we paid off our $225 million term loan. Additionally, interest expense in 2009 included a $4.9 million charge for the termination of our interest rate swap agreements and a $0.8 million write-off of deferred financing fees as a result of the payoff of our $225 million term loan.

Provision for (Benefit from) Income Tax.    We recognized income tax expense of $8.4 million, or 71.1% of pretax income, in 2010 compared to an income tax benefit of $28.8 million, or 30% of our pretax loss, in 2009 for federal, state, and foreign income taxes. Our effective income tax rate increased 31.1 percentage points from 2009, principally due to the effects of foreign operations, state tax effects, and certain items present in 2010 that were not present in 2009.

The effect of foreign operations, which includes the impact of lower foreign statutory tax rates, foreign exchange rate movements and a modest amount of U.S. foreign tax credits accounted for 16.6 percentage points of the increase. Changes in the mix of domestic income and normal revisions to state apportionment factors which cause a cumulative adjustment to state deferred tax balances were the principal components of the 14.5 percentage point increase attributed to state taxes. The repeal of the Medicare subsidy, together with adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits accounted for another 7.0 percentage point increase. Nondeductible officer’s compensation and other non deductible business expenses comprised the remaining 3.0 percentage point increase.

Reconciliation of the 2009 effective income tax rate to the 2010 effective income tax rate:

 

2009 effective income tax rate

        30.0

Changes in effective income tax rate:

     

Effects of foreign operations

     16.6      

State taxes

     14.5      

Tax reserves/law changes

     7.0      

Non-deductible officer compensation

     1.6      

Other

     1.4         41.1   
     

 

 

 

2010 effective income tax rate

        71.1
     

 

 

 

Refer to Note 5 to our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for a reconciliation between our effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate.

Duty Drawback Investigation

We maintained a program through an authorized agent to recapture duty paid on imported titanium sponge as an offset against exports for products shipped outside the U.S. by the Company or its customers. The agent, who matched the Company’s duty paid with the export shipments through filings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”), performed the recapture process.

Historically, we recognized a credit to Cost of Sales when we received notification from our agent that a claim had been filed and received by U.S. Customs. For the period January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2007, we recognized a reduction to Cost of Sales totaling $14.5 million associated with the recapture of duty paid. This amount represents the total of all claims filed by the agent on our behalf.

During 2007, we received notice from U.S. Customs that we were under formal investigation with respect to $7.6 million of claims previously filed by the agent on our behalf. The investigation related to discrepancies in, and lack of supporting documentation for, claims filed through our authorized agent. We revoked the authorized agent’s authority and have fully cooperated with U.S. Customs to determine the validity of such claims. We are fully engaged and cooperating with U.S. Customs in an effort to complete the investigation in an expeditious manner.

 

29


Table of Contents

Concurrent with the U.S. Customs investigation, we performed an internal review of the entire $14.5 million of drawback claims filed with U.S. Customs to determine the validity of our claims. As a result of our internal review, we recorded charges totaling $10.5 million to Cost of Sales through December 31, 2009. No additional charges were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

These above-mentioned charges represent our current best estimate of probable loss. Of this amount, $9.5 million was recorded as a contingent current liability and $1.0 million was recorded as a write-off of an outstanding receivable representing claims filed which had not yet been paid by U.S. Customs. Through December 31, 2010, we had repaid $6.7 million to U.S. Customs for invalid claims. No additional payments were made during the year ended December 31, 2011. As a result of these payments, the Company’s accrued liability totaled $2.8 million as of December 31, 2011. While the ultimate outcome of the U.S. Customs investigation is not yet known, we do not believe there is additional risk of loss associated with this investigation. In fact, we received a favorable protest ruling on certain claims and are awaiting disposition by U.S. Customs.

Additionally, we are exposed to potential penalties imposed by U.S. Customs on these claims. In December 2009, we received formal pre-penalty notices from U.S. Customs imposing penalties in the amount of $1.7 million. While we have the opportunity to negotiate with U.S. Customs to potentially obtain relief of these penalties, due to the inherent uncertainty of the penalty process, we have accrued the full amount of the penalty as of December 31, 2009. There was no change to the amount accrued for penalties during the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2011.

During the fourth quarter of 2007, we began filing new duty drawback claims through a new authorized agent. Claims filed through December 31, 2010 totaled $8.5 million. No additional claims were filed during the year ended December 31, 2011. As a result of the open investigation discussed above, we have not recognized any credits to cost of sales upon the filing of these new claims. We intend to record these credits when payment is received from U.S. Customs until a consistent history of receipts against claims filed has been established. In December 2011, we received a payment of $1.6 million from U.S. Customs in satisfaction of the first claims filed in December 2007 under our new duty drawback program.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On November 23, 2011, we acquired Aeromet Advanced Forming, which has been renamed RTI Advanced Forming, Ltd., for cash consideration of $35.8 million. On February 13, 2012, we acquired Remmele Engineering, Inc. and REI Medical, Inc. for cash consideration of approximately $179 million and the assumption of approximately $3 million of equipment leases. These acquisitions were financed through our existing cash and other highly-liquid investments on hand.

In connection with our long-term mill product supply agreements for the Joint Strike Fighter (“JSF”) program and the Airbus family of commercial aircraft, including the A380 and A350XWB programs, we are constructing a new titanium forging and rolling facility in Martinsville, Virginia, and new melting facilities in Canton and Niles, Ohio, with anticipated capital spending of approximately $160 million. The Niles melting facility is substantially complete, whereas we have capital spending of approximately $3 million remaining on the Canton facility and expect it will begin operations in the 2012 to 2013 timeframe. We have capital expenditures of approximately $40 million remaining related to the Martinsville, Virginia facility which began operations in December 2011. We expect this facility will enable us to enhance our throughput and shorten lead times on certain products, primarily titanium sheet and plate. We will continually evaluate market conditions as we move forward with these capital projects to ensure our operational capabilities are matched to our anticipated demand.

 

30


Table of Contents

Provided we continue to meet our financial covenants under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), we expect that our cash and cash equivalents of $156.8 million, short-term investments of $164.3 million, marketable securities of $12.7 million and our undrawn credit facility, combined with internally generated funds, will provide us sufficient liquidity to meet our operating needs and capital expansion plans, and the acquisition of Remmele

The financial covenants and ratios under our Credit Agreement are described below:

 

   

Our leverage ratio (the ratio of Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement) was (1.13) at December 31, 2011, primarily as a function of our excess cash position. If this ratio were to exceed 3.25 to 1, we would be in default under our Credit Agreement and our ability to borrow under our Credit Agreement would be impaired.

 

   

Our interest coverage ratio (the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA to Net Interest, as defined in the Credit Agreement) was 8.4 at December 31, 2011. If this ratio were to fall below 2.0 to 1, we would be in default under our Credit Agreement and our ability to borrow under the Credit Agreement would be impaired.

Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, allows for adjustments related to unusual gains and losses, certain noncash items, and certain non-recurring charges. As of December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with our financial covenants under the Credit Agreement.

Cash provided by operating activities.    Cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $14.8 million and $75.2 million, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to the increase in our working capital, principally accounts receivable, as well as our pension contributions of $27.8 million in the current year compared to $3.0 million in the prior year.

Cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $75.2 million and $33.0 million, respectively. This increase was primarily due to the increase in our net income levels for the year ended December 31, 2010, as well as improvements in our working capital.

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities.    Cash provided by (used in) investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $(235.0) million and $20.1 million, respectively. The decrease was primarily attributable to the investing of excess cash into short-term investments and marketable securities and the purchase of Aeromet Advanced Forming, Ltd. for approximately $35.8 million.

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $20.1 million and $(147.3) million, respectively. The increase was primarily attributable to lower capital expenditures and the maturity of $45.0 million of certificates of deposit with six-month maturities purchased in 2009. In addition, during 2009 we invested $20.0 million in certain short-term investments to increase our rate of return on our invested cash.

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities.    Cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $0.3 million and $223.8 million, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the issuance of the Notes in December 2010, which generated $222.8 million, net of related fees.

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $223.8 million and $(115.1) million, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the issuance of the Notes in December 2010, which generated $222.8 million, net of related fees. Financing activities utilized cash in 2009 as a result of our repayment of all outstanding amounts, totaling $243.5 million, under our Term $225 million senior term loan, our credit facility between RTI Claro and National City Bank’s Canada Branch, and our Canadian interest-free loan agreement, partially offset by the $127.4 million received from our equity offering.

 

31


Table of Contents

Backlog.    Our order backlog for all markets was approximately $476 million as of December 31, 2011, compared to $347 million at December 31, 2010. Of the backlog at December 31, 2011, approximately $409 million is likely to be realized during 2012. We define backlog as firm business scheduled for release into our production process for a specific delivery date. We have numerous contracts that extend over multiple years, including the Airbus, JSF and Boeing 787 Dreamliner® long-term supply agreements, which are not included in backlog until a specific release into production or a firm delivery date has been established.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Other Post-Retirement Benefits

Following is a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations, commercial commitments, and other post-retirement benefit obligations as of December 31, 2011 (in millions):

 

     Contractual Obligations  
     2012      2013      2014      2015      2016      Thereafter      Total  

Convertible notes(1)

   $ 6.9       $ 6.9       $ 6.9       $ 236.9       $       $       $ 257.6   

Operating leases(2)

     5.4         4.3         3.5         2.9         2.5         4.7         23.3   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total contractual obligations

   $ 12.3       $ 11.2       $ 10.4       $ 239.8       $ 2.5       $ 4.7       $ 280.9   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     Commercial Commitments  
     Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period  
     2012      2013      2014      2015      2016      Thereafter      Total  

Long-term supply agreements(3)(7)(8)

   $ 141.5       $ 109.2       $ 117.3       $ 112.4       $ 115.9       $ 208.5       $ 804.8   

Purchase obligations(4)

     85.8         2.3         0.5                                 88.6   

Standby letters of credit(5)

     4.6         0.7                                         5.3   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial commitments

   $ 231.9       $ 112.2       $ 117.8       $ 112.4       $ 115.9       $ 208.5       $ 898.7   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     Other Post-Retirement Benefits  
     2012      2013      2014      2015      2016      2017-2021      Total  

Other post-retirement benefits(6)

   $ 3.2       $ 3.5       $ 3.7       $ 3.5       $ 3.7       $ 18.9       $ 36.5   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     Tax Obligations  
     2012      2013      2014      2015      2016      Thereafter      Total  

Uncertain tax positions(9)

   $       $       $       $       $       $ 6.2       $ 6.2   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) See Note 13 to our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. Includes semi-annual interest payments of $3.45 million through December 2015.
(2) See Note 8 to our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3) Amounts represent commitments for which contractual terms exceed twelve months.
(4) Amounts primarily represent purchase commitments under purchase orders.
(5) Amounts represent standby letters of credit primarily related to commercial performance and insurance guarantees.
(6) We do not fund our other post-retirement employee benefits obligations but instead pay amounts when billed. The estimates presented are based on current benefit plan coverage and are not contractual commitments in as much as we retain the right to modify, reduce, or terminate any such coverage in the future. Amounts shown in the years 2012 through 2021 are based on actuarial estimates of expected future cash payments, and exclude the impacts of benefits associated with the Medicare Part D Act of 2003.
(7)

Our current titanium sponge long-term supply agreement, which began in 2009, runs through 2016 and provides us with supply of up to 13.5 million pounds of titanium sponge annually. For the remaining term of this agreement, we have agreed to purchase a certain minimum amount of titanium sponge annually, ranging from 6.25 million to 9 million pounds. During the latter years of the contract, quantities can be reduced by

 

32


Table of Contents
  the election of various options by both parties. Future obligations were determined based on current prices as prices are negotiated annually. Purchases under the contract are denominated in U.S. Dollars.
(8) In December 2009, we entered into two new contracts with two Japanese suppliers for the long-term supply of titanium sponge for delivery between 2012 and 2021. The contracts provide us with the supply of up to 19.2 million pounds of titanium sponge annually. The price of the titanium sponge is fixed, subject to certain underlying input cost adjustments and potential price adjustments based on the Yen to U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Future obligations were determined based on the fixed price and minimum volumes.
(9) These amounts are included in the “Thereafter” column as it cannot be reasonably estimated when these amounts may be settled.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

Credit Agreements

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at our option at a rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (the “LIBOR Rate”) plus an applicable margin or a prime rate plus an applicable margin. In addition, we pay a facility fee in connection with the Credit Agreement. Both the applicable margin and the facility fee vary based upon our consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement matures on September 27, 2012.

New Accounting Standards

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement — Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS.” The new guidance amends current fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements to include expansion of the information required for “Level 3” measurements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and are to be applied prospectively. We do not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income — Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” This ASU requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, and apply retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance, as amended by ASU No 2011-12, which deferred certain portions of ASU No. 2011-05, during the fourth quarter of 2011, did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Impairment – Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” This ASU added an optional qualitative analysis to the yearly testing for goodwill impairment. Depending on the outcome of this analysis, the quantitative two-step process could be eliminated for the year the analysis is performed. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet — Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” This new guidance requires the disclosure of both net and gross information in the notes for relevant assets and liabilities that are offset. This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. We are evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

33


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that have a material impact on the amounts recorded for assets and liabilities and resulting revenue and expenses. Management estimates are based on historical evidence and other available information, which in management’s opinion provide the most reasonable and likely result under the current facts and circumstances. Under different facts and circumstances expected results may differ materially from the facts and circumstances applied by management.

Of the accounting policies described in Note 2 of our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and others not expressly stated but adopted by management as the most appropriate and reasonable under the current facts and circumstances, the effect upon the Company of the policy of accounts receivable, inventories, goodwill and intangible assets, long-lived assets, income taxes, employee benefit plans, and accrued liabilities, would be most critical if management estimates were incorrect. Generally accepted accounting principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Inventories.    Inventories are valued at cost as determined by the last-in, first out (“LIFO”), first-in, first-out (“FIFO”), and weighted-average cost methods. Inventory costs generally include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead (including depreciation). The majority of our inventory is valued utilizing the LIFO costing methodology. When market conditions indicate an excess of carrying cost over market value, a lower-of-cost-or-market provision is recorded. The remaining inventories are valued at cost determined by a combination of the FIFO and weighted-average cost methods.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets.    In the case of goodwill and intangible assets, if future product demand or market conditions reduce management’s expectation of future cash flows from these assets, a write-down of the carrying value may be required. Intangible assets were originally valued at fair value with the assistance of outside experts. In the event that demand or market conditions change and the expected future cash flows associated with these assets is reduced, a write-down or acceleration of the amortization period may be required. Intangible assets are amortized over a period of 20 years.

Management evaluates the recoverability of goodwill by first determining, through a qualitative analysis, whether there have been any events or changes in circumstances that would indicate a potential impairment. If the qualitative analysis indicates that it is more-likely-than-not that an impairment has occurred, management compares the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying value. The fair values of the reporting units are determined using an average of a discounted cash flow analysis based on historical and projected financial information and a market valuation approach. A discounted cash flow analysis provides a fair value estimate based upon each reporting unit’s long-term operating and cash flow performance. This approach also considers the impact of cyclical downturns that occur in the titanium and aerospace industries. The market valuation approach applies market multiples such as EBITDA and revenue multiples developed from a set of peer group companies to each reporting unit to determine its fair value.

During our annual qualitative assessment performed as of October 1, 2011, the following key factors were considered:

 

   

We have a strong backlog and rely heavily on long-term contracts and pricing which extends out over the next eight to ten years. We currently have long-term agreements in place with both Boeing and Airbus, both of whom currently have a production backlog of approximately eight years and are ramping up aircraft production to meet current demand.

 

   

For a significant portion of titanium sponge purchases, our primary raw material for mill product which supports our long-term contracts, we have long-term supply agreements starting in 2012 to 2013 and lasting through 2021 that significantly reduce price volatility.

 

34


Table of Contents
   

Long-term outlook for titanium: We anticipate that titanium will remain a key material used within the commercial aerospace and defense markets due to the continued increased use of titanium in airframes and in jet engines, as well as in artillery weapons systems and armored vehicles. Titanium is growing in its use due to the metal’s high strength, low weight, compatibility with composites, and noncorrosive qualities. As a result of our current position as a supplier on the long-term programs noted above, we anticipate that we will be in a position going forward to leverage these relationships as new opportunities related to titanium use within the commercial aerospace and defense markets arise.

 

   

We have an integrated business model. As an integrated supplier, we maintain a breadth of capabilities that span the production cycle for highly-engineered titanium and specialty metal components. Unlike other suppliers of titanium and various specialty metals, we provide our customers with solutions spanning the value stream, from titanium mill products to major assembly design, kitting, and system integration. As a result of our participation throughout the supply chain value stream, especially our unique fabrication capabilities, we believe that we offer significant structural advantages as aircraft production increases and continued design enhancements, as well as cost containment initiatives, drive demand for fabricated titanium parts. This demand and operating leverage should serve to drive revenue growth and profitability during the coming period of anticipated build-rate expansion.

 

   

As of October 1, 2011, the date of our annual goodwill impairment test, our market capitalization was approximately 3% lower than net book value. However, our market capitalization fluctuated significantly in the last six months of 2011, with the beginning of October being the low point for that period.

 

   

The Titanium, U.S. Distribution, and European Distribution reporting units all exceeded prior year and forecasted results, while the Fabrication reporting unit performed below expectations.

Based on the above factors, it was determined that further testing of the recoverability of our goodwill was not required at our Titanium, Fabrication, U.S. Distribution, and European Distribution reporting units. Furthermore, while we did not believe that it was more-likely-than-not that an impairment had occurred at our Fabrication reporting unit, management elected to perform the two-step impairment test due to certain negative factors present within our qualitative assessment. The result of our two-step test indicated that fair value of the Fabrication reporting unit significantly exceeded its book value. For further details of our annual goodwill impairment test, refer to Note 2 to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

Long-Lived Assets.    Management evaluates the recoverability of property, plant, and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of any such asset may not be fully recoverable in accordance with FASB’s authoritative guidance. Changes in circumstances may include technological changes, changes in our business model, capital structure, economic conditions, or operating performance. Our evaluation is based upon, among other items, our assumptions about the estimated undiscounted cash flows these assets are expected to generate. When the sum of the undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value, we will recognize an impairment loss. Management applies its best judgment when performing these evaluations to determine the timing of the testing, the undiscounted cash flows associated with the assets, and the fair value of the asset.

Income Taxes.    The likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets is reviewed by management quarterly, giving consideration to all the current facts and circumstances. Based upon their review, management records the appropriate valuation allowance to reduce the value of the deferred tax assets to the amount more likely than not to be realized. Should management determine in a future period that an additional valuation allowance is required, due to unfavorable changes in the facts and circumstances, there would be a corresponding charge to income tax expense.

Tax benefits related to uncertain tax provisions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return are recorded when such benefits meet a more likely than not threshold. Otherwise, these tax benefits are recorded when a tax position has been effectively settled, which means that either the appropriate taxing authority has completed their examination even though the statute of limitations remains open, or the statute of limitation expires. Interest and

 

35


Table of Contents

penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized as part of the provision for income taxes and are accrued beginning in the period that such interest and penalties would be applicable under relevant tax law until such time that the related tax benefits are recognized.

Employee Benefit Plans.    Included in our accounting for defined benefit pension plans are assumptions on future discount rates, expected return on assets, and rate of future compensation changes. We consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates and plan asset investment returns, as well as longer-term assumptions in determining these assumptions. Actuarial assumptions may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions or higher or lower withdrawal rates. These differences may result in a significant impact to the amount of net pension expense or income recorded in the future.

A discount rate is used to determine the present value of future payments. In general, our liability increases as the discount rate decreases and decreases as the discount rate increases. The rate was determined by taking into consideration a Dedicated Bond Portfolio model in order to select a discount rate that best matches the expected payment streams of the future payments. Under this model, a hypothetical bond portfolio is constructed with cash flows that are expected to settle in the same timeline as the benefit payment stream from the plans. The portfolio is developed using bonds with a Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s rating of “Aa” or better based on those bonds available as of the measurement date. The appropriate discount rate is then selected based on the resulting yield from this portfolio. The discount rate used to determine our future benefit obligation was 4.90% and 5.70% at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The discount rate is a significant factor in determining the amounts reported. A one quarter percent change in the discount rate of 4.90% used at December 31, 2011 would have the following effect on the defined benefit plans:

 

     –.25%      +.25%  

Effect on total projected benefit obligation (PBO) (in millions)

   $ 3.7       $ (3.7

Effect on subsequent years periodic pension expense (in millions)

   $ 0.3       $ (0.3

We developed the expected return on plan assets by considering various factors which include targeted asset allocation percentages, historical returns, and expected future returns. We assumed an expected rate of return of 7.5% in both 2011 and 2010. A one quarter percent change in the expected rate of return would have the following effect on the defined benefit plans:

 

     –.25%      +.25%  

Effect on subsequent years periodic pension expense (in millions)

   $ 0.6       $ (0.6

The fair value of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

 

Investment category (in $000’s)    2011      2010  

U.S. government securities

   $ 14,852       $ 13,300   

Corporate bonds

     34,130         23,637   

Equities

     68,419         53,282   

Short-term investment funds

     807         2,490   

Real estate funds

     2,584         1,888   

Other investments — Timberlands

     1,652         1,600   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 122,444       $ 96,197   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

36


Table of Contents

The Company’s target asset allocation as of December 31, 2011 by asset category is as follows:

 

Investment Category    2011  

Equity securities

     55

Debt securities and other short-term investments

     43

Cash

     2
  

 

 

 

Total

     100
  

 

 

 

Our investment policy for the defined benefit pension plans includes various guidelines and procedures designed to ensure assets are invested in a manner necessary to meet expected future benefits earned by participants. The investment guidelines consider a broad range of economic conditions. Central to the policy are target allocation ranges (shown above) by major asset categories. The objectives of the target allocations are to maintain investment portfolios that diversify risk through prudent asset allocation parameters, achieve asset returns that meet or exceed the plans’ actuarial assumptions, and achieve asset returns that are competitive with like institutions employing similar investment strategies. Within these broad investment categories, our investment policy places certain restrictions on the types and amounts of plan investments. For example, no individual stock may account for more than 5% of total equities, no single corporate bond issuer rated below AA may equal more than 10% of the total bond portfolio, non-investment grade bonds may not exceed 10% of the total bond portfolio, and private equity and real estate investments may not exceed 8% of total plan assets.

The Company and a designated third-party fiduciary periodically review the investment policy. The policy is established and administered in a manner so as to comply at all times with applicable government regulations.

The following pension and post-retirement benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (in millions):

 

     Pension
Benefit
Plans
     Post-Retirement
Benefit Plan
(including Plan D
subsidy)
     Post-Retirement
Benefit Plan (not
including Plan D
subsidy)
 

2012

   $ 9.1       $ 3.0       $ 3.2   

2013

     9.1         3.3         3.5   

2014

     9.4         3.5         3.7   

2015

     9.4         3.2         3.5   

2016

     9.6         3.4         3.7   

2017 to 2021

     52.5         17.0         18.9   

In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (“the Act”) was signed into law. The Act introduced a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (“Medicare Part D”) as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D.

During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we made cash contributions totaling $27.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively, to our Company-sponsored pension plans. We expect to make cash contributions totaling approximately $12.0 million during 2012 to maintain our desired funding status.

Environmental Liabilities.    We are subject to environmental laws and regulations as well as various health and safety laws and regulations that are subject to frequent modifications and revisions. During 2011, 2010, and 2009, the Company paid approximately $0.1 million, $0.1 million, and $0.8 million, respectively, against previously recorded liabilities for environmental remediation, compliance, and related services. While the costs of compliance for these matters have not had a material adverse impact on the Company in the past, it is not

 

37


Table of Contents

possible to accurately predict the ultimate effect these changing laws and regulations may have on the Company in the future. We continue to evaluate our obligation for environmental-related costs on a quarterly basis and make adjustments as necessary.

Given the evolving nature of environmental laws, regulations, and remediation techniques, our ultimate obligation for investigative and remediation costs cannot be predicted. It is our policy to recognize environmental costs in the financial statements when an obligation becomes probable and a reasonable estimate of exposure can be determined. When a single estimate cannot be reasonably made, but a range can be reasonably estimated, we accrue the amount we determine to be the most likely amount within that range. If no single amount is more likely than others within the range, we accrue the lowest amount within the range.

Based on available information, we believe that our share of possible environmental-related costs is in a range from $0.7 million to $2.2 million in the aggregate. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the amount accrued for future environmental-related costs was $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Of the total amount accrued at December 31, 2011, approximately $0.1 million is expected to be paid out within one year and is included as a component of other accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remaining $1.2 million is recorded as a component of other noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts in excess of those already provided may be necessary to discharge us from our obligations for these sites.

 

38


Table of Contents
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to market risk arising from changes in commodity prices as a result of our long-term purchase and supply agreements with certain suppliers and customers. These agreements, which offer various fixed or formula-determined pricing arrangements, effectively obligate us to bear the risk of (i) increased raw material and other costs to us that cannot be passed on to our customers through increased product prices or (ii) decreasing raw material costs to our suppliers that are not passed on to us in the form of lower raw material prices.

Interest Rate Risk

Our outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2011 are at a fixed annual interest rate of 3.0%; therefore we are not subject to material risk arising from the fluctuation of interest rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We are subject to foreign currency exchange exposure for purchases of raw materials, equipment, and services, including wages, which are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, as well as non-U.S. Dollar denominated sales. However, the majority of our sales are made in U.S. Dollars, which minimizes our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. From time to time, we may use forward exchange contracts to manage these transaction risks.

In addition to these transaction risks, we are subject to foreign currency exchange exposure for our non-U.S. Dollar denominated assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. From time to time, we may use forward exchange contracts to manage these translation risks. We had no foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding at December 31, 2011.

 

39


Table of Contents

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Index to Financial Statements

 

     Page  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     41   

Financial Statements:

  

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

     42   

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December  31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

     43   

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010

     44   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

     45   

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December  31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

     46   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

     47   

Financial Statement Schedules:

  

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

     S-1   

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

 

40


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

RTI International Metals, Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of RTI International Metals, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“RTI” or the “Company”) at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As described in Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting, management has excluded RTI Advanced Forming, Ltd. (“Advanced Forming”) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 because they were acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination on November 23, 2011. We have also excluded Advanced Forming from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Advanced Forming is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 3.2% and 0.4%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.

LOGO

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

February 28, 2012

 

41


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2011     2010     2009  

Net sales

   $ 529,679      $ 431,793      $ 407,978   

Cost and expenses:

      

Cost of sales

     429,007        355,908        352,167   

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

     71,020        63,580        63,490   

Research, technical, and product development expenses

     3,392        3,256        2,001   

Asset and asset-related charges (income)

     (1,501     (5,012     68,897   

Goodwill impairment

                   8,699   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

     27,761        14,061        (87,276

Other income (expense)

     19        (622     2,056   

Interest income

     1,151        492        1,511   

Interest expense

     (16,796     (2,111     (12,347
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

     12,135        11,820        (96,056

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

     5,583        8,403        (28,817
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ 6,552      $ 3,417      $ (67,239
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per share:

      

Basic

   $ 0.22      $ 0.11      $ (2.67
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

   $ 0.22      $ 0.11      $ (2.67
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding:

      

Basic

     30,017,677        29,916,465        25,029,976   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

     30,257,185        30,145,099        25,029,976   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

42


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2011     2010     2009  

Net income (loss)

   $ 6,552      $ 3,417      $ (67,239

Other comprehensive income (loss)

      

Foreign currency translation

     (1,876     5,981        10,033   

Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of tax of $(19), $(8), and $23

     (35     (15     42   

Benefit plan amortization, net of tax of $(2,861), $(2,552), and $(329)

     (4,963     (4,740     (611

Unrealized gain on derivatives net of tax of $0, $0, and $278

                   516   

Realized loss on derivatives net of tax of $0, $0, and $1,513

                   2,809   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

     (6,874     1,226        12,789   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (322   $ 4,643      $ (54,450
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

43


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

     December 31,  
     2011     2010  

ASSETS

    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 156,842      $ 376,951   

Short-term investments

     164,255        20,275   

Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $872 and $478

     95,022        56,235   

Inventories, net

     275,059        269,719   

Deferred income taxes

     18,674        22,891   

Other current assets

     9,932        16,299   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     719,784        762,370   

Property, plant, and equipment, net

     289,434        260,576   

Marketable securities

     12,683          

Goodwill

     55,864        41,795   

Other intangible assets, net

     22,576        14,066   

Deferred income taxes

     27,424        21,699   

Other noncurrent assets

     5,173        6,348   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 1,132,938      $ 1,106,854   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

   $ 59,591      $ 47,226   

Accrued wages and other employee costs

     27,260        21,951   

Unearned revenues

     31,690        28,358   

Other accrued liabilities

     20,085        28,179   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     138,626        125,714   

Long-term debt

     186,981        178,107   

Liability for post-retirement benefits

     41,388        39,903   

Liability for pension benefits

     20,830        33,830   

Deferred income taxes

     13,606        3,147   

Other noncurrent liabilities

     8,755        7,753   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     410,186        388,454   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

    

Shareholders’ equity:

    

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 30,946,409 and 30,858,725 shares issued; 30,196,980 and 30,123,519 shares outstanding

     309        309   

Additional paid-in capital

     479,245        474,277   

Treasury stock, at cost; 749,429 and 735,206 shares

     (17,657     (17,363

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (39,211     (32,337

Retained earnings

     300,066        293,514   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

     722,752        718,400   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   $ 1,132,938      $ 1,106,854   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

44


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

 

    Years Ended December 31,  
    2011     2010     2009  

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

     

Net income (loss)

  $ 6,552      $ 3,417      $ (67,239

Adjustment for non-cash items:

     

Depreciation and amortization

    22,488        22,111        21,163   

Asset and asset-related charges (income)

    (597     (2,738     68,897   

Goodwill impairment

                  8,699   

Deferred income taxes, net

    8,386        16,039        (29,479

Stock-based compensation

    4,599        3,847        4,399   

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity

    (302     (380     (39

(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant, and equipment, net

    70        (1,362     127   

Amortization of debt issuance costs

    1,471        762        1,271   

Amortization of discount on long-term debt

    8,900        393          

Amortization of premiums paid for short-term investments and marketable securities, net

    2,012                 

Bad debt expense

    135        193        194   

Changes in assets and liabilities:

     

Receivables

    (34,755     4,058        20,679   

Inventories

    160        (2,972     11,325   

Accounts payable

    6,271        2,126        8,785   

Income taxes payable

    67        223        (713

Deferred revenue

    2,495        10,505        (2,150

Liability for pension benefits

    (22,066     1,618        1,059   

Other current assets and liabilities, net

    5,262        16,621        (18,609

Other noncurrent assets and liabilities, net

    3,687        747        4,630   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash provided by operating activities

    14,835        75,208        32,999   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

     

Proceeds from disposal of property, plant, and equipment

    20        4,011        22   

Acquisitions

    (35,812              

Purchase of investments

    (309,820     (234     (105,000

Maturity/sale of investments

    149,411        45,000        40,000   

Capital expenditures

    (38,845     (28,632     (82,285
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities

    (235,046     20,145        (147,263
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

     

Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options

    367        1,095        120   

Borrowings on long-term debt

           230,000        1,181   

Repayments on long-term debt

    (25     (36     (243,455

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity

    302        380        39   

Purchase of common stock held in treasury

    (294     (367     (105

Proceeds from equity offering, net

                  127,423   

Financing fees

           (7,249     (300
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities

    350        223,823        (115,097

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

    (248     1,559        1,128   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

    (220,109     320,735        (228,233

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    376,951        56,216        284,449   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $ 156,842      $ 376,951      $ 56,216   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

     

Cash paid for interest

  $ 7,148      $ 588      $ 11,693   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash paid (refund received) for income taxes

  $ (10,191   $ (8,141   $ 6,092   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

     

Issuance of common stock for restricted stock awards

  $ 1,985      $ 1,712      $ 1,826   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

45


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

    Common Stock     Additional
Paid-In
Capital
                Accumulated
Other

Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
       
    Shares
Outstanding
    Amount       Treasury
Stock
    Retained
Earnings
      Total  

Balance at December 31, 2008

    23,004,136      $ 237      $ 307,604      $ (16,891   $ 357,336      $ (46,352   $ 601,934   

Net loss

                                (67,239            (67,239

Other comprehensive income

                                       12,789        12,789   

Shares issued for directors’ compensation

    35,911                                             

Shares issued for performance share award plans

    53                                             

Shares issued for restricted stock award plans

    89,360        1                                    1   

Stock-based compensation expense recognized

                  4,399                             4,399   

Shares issued for equity offering

    6,900,000        69        127,647                             127,716   

Treasury stock purchased at cost

    (6,823                   (105                   (105

Exercise of employee options

    11,070               120                             120   

Forfeiture of restricted stock awards

    (22,709                                          

Tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity

                  (409                          (409
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

    30,010,998      $ 307      $ 439,361      $ (16,996   $ 290,097      $ (33,563   $ 679,206   

Net Income

                                3,417               3,417   

Other comprehensive income

                                       1,226        1,226   

Shares issued for directors’ compensation

    16,763                                             

Shares issued for restricted stock award plans

    49,770        1                                    1   

Stock-based compensation expense recognized

                  3,847                             3,847   

Treasury stock purchased at cost

    (14,053                   (367                   (367

Exercise of employee options

    62,757        1        1,096                             1,097   

Forfeiture of restricted stock awards

    (7,800                                          

Tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity

                  54                             54   

Shares issued for employee stock purchase plan

    5,084               131                             131   

Equity component of convertible debt, net of deferred taxes

                  29,788                             29,788   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

    30,123,519      $ 309      $ 474,277      $ (17,363   $ 293,514      $ (32,337   $ 718,400   

Net Income

                                6,552               6,552   

Other comprehensive loss

                                       (6,874     (6,874

Shares issued for directors’ compensation

    14,273                                             

Shares issued for restricted stock award plans

    54,665                                             

Stock-based compensation expense recognized

                  4,599                             4,599   

Treasury stock purchased at cost

    (10,423                   (294                   (294

Exercise of employee options

    13,653               178                             178   

Forfeiture of restricted stock awards

    (3,800                                          

Tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity

                  2                             2   

Shares issued for employee stock purchase plan

    6,893               189                             189   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

    30,198,780      $ 309      $ 479,245      $ (17,657   $ 300,066      $ (39,211   $ 722,752   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

46


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

Note 1—ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS:

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of RTI International Metals, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “RTI”) include the financial position and results of operations for the Company.

The Company is a leading producer and global supplier of advanced titanium mill products and a manufacturer of fabricated advanced titanium and specialty metal components for the international aerospace, defense, energy, and industrial and consumer markets. It is a successor to entities that have been operating in the titanium industry since 1951. The Company first became publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange in 1990 under the name RMI Titanium Co. and the symbol “RTI”, and was reorganized into a holding company structure in 1998 under the name RTI International Metals, Inc.

The Company conducts business in three segments: the Titanium Group, the Fabrication Group, and the Distribution Group.

The Titanium Group melts, processes, and produces a complete range of titanium mill products which are further processed by its customers for use in a variety of commercial aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer applications. With operations in Niles, Ohio; Canton, Ohio; Hermitage, Pennsylvania; and Martinsville, Virginia, the Titanium Group has overall responsibility for the production of primary mill products including, but not limited to, bloom, billet, sheet, and plate. In addition, the Titanium Group produces ferro titanium alloys for its steel-making customers. The Titanium Group also focuses on the research and development of evolving technologies relating to raw materials, melting and other production processes, and the application of titanium in new markets.

The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered parts and assemblies, serve commercial aerospace, defense, oil and gas, power generation, medical device, and chemical process industries, as well as a number of other industrial and consumer markets. With operations located in Houston, Texas; Washington, Missouri; Laval, Canada; and Welwyn Garden City, England, the Fabrication Group provides value-added products and services such as engineered tubulars and extrusions, fabricated and machined components and sub-assemblies, as well as engineered systems for deepwater oil and gas exploration and production infrastructure.

The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes, cuts-to-size, and facilitates just-in-time delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys. With operations in Garden Grove, California; Windsor, Connecticut; Sullivan, Missouri; Tamworth, England; and Rosny-Sur-Seine, France, the Distribution Group is in close proximity to its wide variety of commercial aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer customers.

Both the Fabrication Group and the Distribution Group utilize the Titanium Group as their primary source of titanium mill products.

Note 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Principles of consolidation:

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of RTI International Metals, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

 

47


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Use of estimates:

Generally accepted accounting principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at year-end and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying values of accounts receivable, inventories, property, plant, and equipment, intangible assets, goodwill, pensions, post-retirement benefits, worker’s compensation, derivative fair values, environmental liabilities, and income taxes.

Fair value:

For certain of the Company’s financial instruments and account groupings, including cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, marketable securities, accounts payable, accrued wages and other employee costs, unearned revenue, and other accrued liabilities, the carrying value approximates the fair value of these instruments and groupings.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) defines fair value as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based upon assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a three-tier fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs utilized in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data and which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. The hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets at fair value, including its short-term investments and marketable securities.

 

48


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Listed below are the Company’s assets, and their respective fair values, that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. For the Company’s short-term investments and marketable securities, fair value was determined based on the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded. There were no transfers between levels during the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company had no financial liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

 

     Quoted Market
Prices

(Level 1)
     Significant
Other Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
     Total  

As of December 31, 2011:

           

Short-term investments:

           

Short-term municipal bond fund

   $       $ 20,542       $       $ 20,542   

Commercial paper

     112,893                         112,893   

Corporate notes and bonds

     30,820                         30,820   

Marketable securities:

           

Corporate notes and bonds

     4,181                         4,181   

U.S. government agencies

     8,502                         8,502   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 156,396       $ 20,542       $       $ 176,938   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2010:

           

Short-term investments:

           

Short-term municipal bond fund

   $       $ 20,275       $       $ 20,275   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $       $ 20,275       $       $ 20,275   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2011, the Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments for which the fair value option was not elected were as follows:

 

 

     December 31, 2011      December 31, 2010  
     Carrying
Amount
     Fair Value      Carrying
Amount
     Fair Value  

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 156,842       $ 156,842       $ 376,951       $ 376,951   

Long-term debt

   $ 186,981       $ 229,540       $ 178,107       $ 239,533   

The fair value of long-term debt was estimated based on the quoted market price for the debt.

Cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and marketable securities:

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents principally consist of investments in short-term money market funds and corporate commercial paper.

 

49


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Available-for-sale securities

Investments in marketable securities that are being held for an indefinite period are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value based on market quotes using the specific identification method, with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income until realized. Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities, if any, are determined on a specific identification basis. The Company considers these investments to be available-for-sale as they may be sold to fund other investment opportunities as they arise.

The major categories of the Company’s cash equivalents and marketable securities are as follows:

Money market mutual funds

The Company invests in money market mutual funds that seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00, while limiting overall exposure to credit, market, and liquidity risks.

Commercial paper

The Company invests in high-quality commercial paper issued by highly-rated corporations. By definition, the stated maturity on commercial paper obligations cannot exceed 270 days.

Short-term municipal bond fund

The dividends received by the Company are not taxable for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. The fund invests in municipal bonds that are near their maturity.

Corporate notes and bonds

The Company evaluates its corporate debt securities based upon a variety of factors including, but not limited to, the credit rating of the issuer. All of the Company’s corporate debt securities are rated as investment grade by the major rating agencies.

U.S. government agencies

These U.S. government guaranteed debt securities are rated as investment grade by the major rating agencies and are publicly traded and valued.

 

50


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and marketable securities consist of the following:

 

 

     December 31  
     2011      2010  

Cash and cash equivalents:

     

Cash

   $ 18,015       $ 31,795   

Cash equivalents:

     

Commercial paper

     6,998           

Money market mutual funds

     131,829         345,156   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

     156,842         376,951   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Short-term investments and marketable securities:

     

Short-term municipal bond fund

     20,542         20,275   

Commercial paper

     112,893           

Corporate notes and bonds

     35,001           

U.S. government agencies

     8,502           
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total short-term investments and marketable securities

     176,938         20,275   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and marketable securities

   $ 333,780       $ 397,226   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company’s short-term investments and marketable securities at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

 

 

     Amortized
Cost
     Gross Unrealized      Fair Value  
        Gains      Losses     

As of December 31, 2011:

           

Short-term municipal bond fund

   $ 20,501       $ 41       $         20,542   

Commercial paper

     112,925         1         33         112,893   

Corporate notes and bonds

     35,060                 59         35,001   

U.S. government agencies

     8,502         1         1         8,502   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 176,988       $ 43       $ 93       $ 176,938   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2010:

           

Short-term municipal bond fund

   $ 20,233       $ 42       $       $ 20,275   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 20,233       $ 42       $       $ 20,275   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company typically purchases its available-for-sale debt securities at a premium or discount. The premium or discount is amortized over the remaining term of each security using the interest method. Amortization is recorded as either a decrease to interest income for premiums or an increase to interest income for discounts. For the year ended December 31, 2011, net amortization of premiums and discounts resulted in reductions to interest income of $2,012.

 

51


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Available-for-sale investments at December 31, 2011 had contractual maturities as follows:

 

 

     Due within
1 year
     Due within
2 years
     Total  

Short-term municipal bond fund

   $ 20,542       $       $ 20,542   

Commercial paper

     112,893                 112,893   

Corporate notes and bonds

     30,820         4,181         35,001   

U.S. government agencies

             8,502         8,502   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 164,255       $ 12,683       $ 176,938   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company classifies investments maturing within one year as short-term investments. Investments maturing in excess of one year are classified as noncurrent.

As of December 31, 2011, no investments classified as available-for-sale have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for greater than twelve months. The Company believes that the unrealized losses on the available-for-sale portfolio as of December 31, 2011 are temporary in nature and are related to market interest rate fluctuations and not indicative of a deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers.

Receivables:

Receivables are carried at net realizable value. Estimates are made as to the Company’s ability to collect outstanding receivables, taking into consideration the amount, the customer’s financial condition, and the age of the debt. The Company ascertains the net realizable value of amounts owed and provides an allowance when collection becomes doubtful. Receivables are expected to be collected in the normal course of business and consisted of the following:

 

 

     December 31,  
     2011     2010  

Trade and commercial customers

   $ 95,894      $ 56,713   

Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts

     (872     (478
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total receivables

   $ 95,022      $ 56,235   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Inventories:

Inventories are valued at cost as determined by the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method for approximately 60% and 63% of the Company’s inventories as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The remaining inventories are valued at cost determined by a combination of the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) and weighted-average cost methods. Inventory costs generally include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead (including depreciation). When market conditions indicate an excess of carrying cost over market value, a lower-of-cost-or-market provision is recorded. The Company’s FIFO inventory value approximates current costs. LIFO decrements did not have a material impact on cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2011. There were no LIFO decrements for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

52


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Inventories consisted of the following:

 

 

     December 31,  
     2011     2010  

Raw materials and supplies

   $ 83,778      $ 118,031   

Work-in-process and finished goods

     255,107        211,001   

LIFO reserve

     (63,826     (59,313
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total inventories

   $ 275,059      $ 269,719   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property, plant, and equipment:

The cost of property, plant, and equipment includes all direct costs of acquisition and capital improvements. Applicable amounts of interest on borrowings outstanding during the construction or acquisition period for major capital projects are capitalized. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company capitalized $975 of interest expense related to its major capital expansion projects. No interest was capitalized by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2010.

Property, plant, and equipment is stated at cost and consisted of the following:

 

 

     December 31,  
     2011     2010  

Land

   $ 11,862      $ 5,614   

Buildings and improvements

     99,384        70,911   

Machinery and equipment

     327,258        263,994   

Computer hardware and software, furniture and fixtures, and other

     60,607        59,125   

Construction-in-progress

     56,794        107,437   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 555,905      $ 507,081   

Less: Accumulated depreciation

     (266,471     (246,505
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total property, plant, and equipment, net

   $ 289,434      $ 260,576   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 was $21,397, $21,127, and $20,272, respectively. Depreciation and amortization are generally recorded over the following useful lives:

 

 

Buildings and improvements

     20-40 years   

Machinery and equipment

     7-15 years   

Furniture and fixtures

     5-10 years   

Computer hardware and software

     3-10 years   

The cost of properties retired or otherwise disposed of, together with the accumulated depreciation provided thereon, is eliminated from the accounts. The net gain or loss is recognized in operating income.

Leased property and equipment under capital leases are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the lease.

 

53


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Routine maintenance, repairs, and replacements are charged to operations. Expenditures that materially increase values, change capacities, or extend useful lives are capitalized.

In December 2009, the Company announced that it had indefinitely delayed the construction of its premium-grade titanium sponge production facility in Hamilton, Mississippi. The indefinite delay was identified as a triggering event for an asset impairment test. The Company reviewed the assets for recoverability and determined the assets were impaired. At the time, the Company had spent approximately $66.9 million related to the construction of this facility and had additional contractual commitments of approximately $7.8 million. The Company determined the fair value of the assets to be $5.8 million using a combination of a market approach and a cost approach. As a result, the Company recorded an asset and asset-related impairment of $68.9 million in December 2009. These assets were not placed into service, therefore no depreciation expense related to them has been recognized.

During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded asset and asset-related charges (income) totaling $(1.5) million and $(5.0) million, respectively. These amounts were comprised principally of the favorable settlement of several previously accrued contractual commitments.

Goodwill and intangible assets:

The Company does not amortize goodwill. On an annual basis, the Company performs an analysis of its reporting units to determine if impairment is indicated, or when events occur which would indicate a potential impairment has occurred. If impairment is indicated, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value to determine if impairment has occurred.

The Company performs its goodwill impairment testing at the reporting unit level. The Company’s five reporting units, which are one level below its operating segments, where appropriate, are as follows: 1) the Titanium reporting unit; 2) the Fabrication reporting unit; 3) the U.S. Distribution reporting unit; 4) the Europe Distribution reporting unit; and 5) the Energy Fabrication reporting unit. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Energy Fabrication reporting unit had no goodwill. All of the Energy Fabrication report unit’s goodwill was impaired in 2009 resulting in an impairment charge of $8,699.

The carrying value of goodwill at the Company’s five reporting units as of the Company’s October 1, 2011 annual impairment test was as follows:

 

 

     Goodwill  

Titanium reporting unit

   $ 2,548   

Fabrication reporting unit

     28,984   

U.S. Distribution reporting unit

     6,856   

Europe Distribution reporting unit

     2,917   

Energy Fabrication reporting unit

       
  

 

 

 

Total Goodwill

   $ 41,305   
  

 

 

 

Goodwill is tested annually during the fourth quarter. The test begins with a qualitative assessment of whether or not events have occurred, or circumstances changed, that would indicate the carrying value of a reporting unit may exceed its fair value. These events and circumstances may include, but are not limited to: significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; an adverse action or assessment by a

 

54


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

regulator; unanticipated competition; a material negative change in relationships with significant customers; strategic decisions made in response to economic or competitive conditions; loss of key personnel; or a more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or disposed. If, based on the Company’s qualitative analysis, it is determined that it is more-likely-than-not that an impairment has occurred at one of the Company’s reporting units, a two-step impairment test under ASC 350 is conducted for that reporting unit.

During the Company’s annual qualitative assessment, the following key factors were considered:

 

   

The Company has a strong backlog and relies heavily on long-term contracts and pricing which extends out over the next eight to ten years. The Company currently has long-term agreements in place with both Boeing and Airbus, both of whom currently have a production backlog of approximately eight years and are ramping up aircraft production to meet current demand.

 

   

For a significant portion of titanium sponge purchases, the Company’s primary raw material for mill product which supports its long-term contracts, the Company has long-term supply agreements starting in 2012 to 2013 and lasting through 2021 that significantly reduce price volatility.

 

   

Long-term outlook for titanium: The Company anticipates that titanium will remain a key material used within the commercial aerospace and defense markets due to the continued increased use of titanium in airframes and in jet engines, as well as in artillery weapons systems and armored vehicles. Titanium is growing in its use due to the metal’s high strength, low weight, compatibility with composites, and noncorrosive qualities. As a result of the Company’s current position as a supplier on the long-term programs noted above, the Company anticipates that it will be in a position going forward to leverage these relationships as new opportunities related to titanium use within the commercial aerospace and defense markets arise.

 

   

The Company has an integrated business model. As an integrated supplier, the Company maintains a breadth of capabilities that span the production cycle for highly-engineered titanium and specialty metal components. Unlike other suppliers of titanium and various specialty metals, the Company provides its customers with solutions spanning the value stream, from titanium mill products to major assembly design, kitting, and system integration. As a result of the Company’s participation throughout the supply chain value stream, especially its unique fabrication capabilities, the Company believes that it offers significant structural advantages as aircraft production increases and continued design enhancements, as well as cost containment initiatives, drive demand for fabricated titanium parts. This demand and operating leverage should serve to drive the Company’s revenue growth and profitability during the coming period of anticipated build-rate expansion.

 

   

As of October 1, 2011, the date of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment test, the Company’s market capitalization was approximately 3% lower than net book value. However, the Company’s market capitalization fluctuated significantly in the last six months of 2011, with the beginning of October being the low point for that period.

 

   

The Titanium, U.S. Distribution, and European Distribution reporting units all exceeded prior year and forecasted results, while the Fabrication reporting unit performed below expectations.

Based on the above factors, it was determined that it was more-likely-than-not that an impairment had not occurred at the Company’s Titanium, Fabrication, U.S. Distribution, and European Distribution reporting units. While it was not determined that the Fabrication reporting unit was likely impaired, due to the Fabrication reporting unit’s lower than forecasted results, coupled with the Company’s market capitalization being lower than net book value as of the testing date, it was determined that the two-step impairment test under ASC 350 should be completed for this reporting unit only.

 

55


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

The fair value of the Fabrication reporting unit was calculated by averaging the fair values determined using a discounted cash flow model and a market approach. A discounted cash flow model is based on historical and projected financial information and provides a fair value estimate based upon the unit’s long-term operation and cash flow performance. This approach also considers the impact of cyclical downturns that occur in the titanium and aerospace industries. The market valuation approach applies market multiples, such as EBITDA and revenue multiples, developed from a set of peer group companies to the tested reporting unit to determine the unit’s fair value. The Company considered the use of a cost approach, but determined such an approach was not appropriate.

Utilizing a discounted cash flow model, the Company estimates its cash flow projections using business and economic data available at the time the projection is calculated. A significant number of assumptions and estimates are involved in the application of the discounted cash flow model to forecast operating cash flows, including overall business conditions, sales volumes and prices, costs of production, and working capital changes. The Company considers historical experience and available information at the time the reporting units’ fair values are estimated. Discount rates were developed using a Weighted-Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) methodology. The WACC represents the blended average required rate of return for equity and debt capital based on observed market return data and reporting unit specific risk factors. The discount rate used in the 2011 discounted cash flow model for the Fabrication reporting unit was 14.0%.

The discounted cash flow model used for the October 1, 2011 Fabrication reporting unit impairment test was consistent with the prior year’s annual test. Significant assumptions that changed from the prior year included overall increases in projected operating profits and related cash flow projections due to overall improvements in the commercial aerospace and titanium markets. The test indicated that the Fabrication unit’s fair value significantly exceeded its carrying value.

Excluding the Energy Fabrication reporting unit, which was fully impaired in 2009, there have been no impairments to date at the Company’s reporting units. Uncertainties or other factors that could result in a potential impairment in future periods may include continued long-term production delays or a significant decrease in expected demand related to the Boeing 787 Dreamliner® program, as well as any cancellation of or material modification to one of the other major aerospace programs the Company currently supplies, including the JSF program or the Airbus family of aircraft, including the A380 and A350XWB programs. In addition, the Company’s ability to ramp up its production of these programs in a cost efficient manner may also impact the results of a future impairment test.

The carrying amount of goodwill attributable to each segment at December 31, 2009, 2010, and 2011 was as follows:

 

 

     Titanium
Group
     Fabrication
Group
    Distribution
Group
     Total
Goodwill
 

December 31, 2009

   $ 2,548       $ 28,687      $ 9,833       $ 41,068   

Translation adjustment

             727                727   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

     2,548         29,414        9,833         41,795   

Additions (Note 3)

             14,303                14,303   

Translation adjustment

             (234             (234
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

   $ 2,548       $ 43,483      $ 9,833       $ 55,864   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

56


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Intangible assets.    Intangible assets consist of customer relationships and developed technologies as a result of the Company’s acquisitions. These finite-lived intangible assets are being amortized over a period of 20 years. The Company believes that this approach is appropriate because it provides a fair value estimate based on the expected long-term cash flows associated with the revenues generated from these customer relationships and developed technologies. In the event that long-term demand or market conditions change and the expected future cash flows associated with these assets is reduced, a write-down or acceleration of the amortization period may be required. Amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization was $1,091, $984, and $891 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009. Estimated annual amortization expense is expected to be approximately $1,424 in each of the next five successive years.

There were no intangible assets attributable to our Titanium Group and Distribution Group at December 31, 2009, 2010, and 2011. The carrying amount of intangible assets attributable to our Fabrication Group at December 31, 2009, 2010, and 2011 was as follows:

 

 

     Intangible
Assets
 

December 31, 2009

   $ 14,299   

Amortization

     (984

Translation adjustment

     751   
  

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

     14,066   

Intangible assets acquired (Note 3)

     9,803   

Amortization

     (1,091

Translation adjustment

     (202
  

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

   $ 22,576   
  

 

 

 

Other long-lived assets:

The Company evaluates the potential impairment of other long-lived assets including property, plant, and equipment when events or circumstances indicate that a change in value may have occurred. If the carrying value of the assets exceeds the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows, the carrying value of the asset is written down to fair value.

Environmental:

The Company expenses environmental costs related to existing conditions from which no future benefit is determinable. Expenditures that enhance or extend the life of the asset are capitalized. The Company determines its liability for remediation on a site-by-site basis and records a liability when it is probable and can be reasonably estimated. The estimated liability of the Company is not discounted or reduced for possible recoveries from insurance carriers.

Treasury stock:

The Company accounts for treasury stock under the cost method and includes such shares as a reduction of total shareholders’ equity.

 

57


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Revenue and cost recognition:

The Company recognizes revenue only upon the acceptance of a definitive agreement or purchase order and upon delivery in accordance with the delivery terms in the agreement or purchase order, and the price to the buyer is fixed and determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

Revenues from the sale of products are recognized upon passage of title, risk of loss, and risk of ownership to the customer. Title, risk of loss, and ownership in most cases coincides with shipment from the Company’s facilities. On occasion, the Company may use shipping terms of FOB-Destination or Ex-Works.

The Company uses the completed contract accounting method for long-term contracts which results in the deferral of costs. This amount is included in “Inventories” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This amount was $8,880 in 2011 and $1,814 in 2010. Contract costs comprise all direct material and labor costs, including outside processing fees, and those indirect costs related to contract performance. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Sales under the completed contract accounting method totaled $22,757, $35,534, and $36,098 in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.

Shipping and handling fees and costs:

All amounts billed to a customer in a sales transaction related to shipping and handling represent revenues earned and are reported as revenue. Costs incurred by the Company for shipping and handling, including transportation costs paid to third-party shippers, are reported as a component of cost of sales.

Research and development:

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. These costs totaled $3,392, $3,256, and $2,001 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.

Pensions:

The Company has a number of pension plans which cover substantially all employees. Most employees in the Titanium Group are covered by defined benefit plans in which benefits are based on years of service and annual compensation. Contributions to the defined benefit plans, as determined by an independent actuary in accordance with applicable regulations, provide not only for benefits attributed to date, but also for those expected to be earned in the future. The Company’s policy is to fund pension costs at amounts equal to the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, for U.S. plans plus additional amounts as may be approved from time to time.

The Company accounts for its defined benefit pension plans in accordance with FASB’s authoritative guidance, which requires amounts recognized in the financial statements to be determined on an actuarial basis, rather than as contributions are made to the plan, and requires recognition of the funded status of the Company’s plans in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, it also requires actuarial gains and losses, prior service costs and credits, and transition obligations that have not yet been recognized to be recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Other post-retirement benefits:

The Company provides health care benefits and life insurance coverage for certain of its employees and their dependents. Under the Company’s current plans, certain of the Company’s employees will become eligible

 

58


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

for those benefits if they reach retirement age while working with the Company. In general, employees of the Titanium Group are covered by post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits.

The Company also sponsors another post-retirement plan covering certain employees. This plan provides health care benefits for eligible employees. These benefits are accounted for on an actuarial basis, rather than as benefits are paid.

The Company does not pre-fund post-retirement benefit costs, but rather pays claims as billed.

Income taxes:

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities multiplied by the enacted tax rates which will be in effect when these differences are expected to reverse. In addition, deferred tax assets may arise from net operating losses (“NOLs”) and tax credits which may be carried back to obtain refunds or carried forward to offset future cash tax liabilities.

On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the available evidence supporting the realization of deferred tax assets and makes adjustments for a valuation allowance, as necessary.

Tax benefits related to uncertain tax provisions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return are recorded when such benefits meet a more-likely-than not threshold. Otherwise, these tax benefits are recorded when a tax position has been effectively settled, which means that either the appropriate taxing authority has completed their examination even though the statute of limitations remains open, or the statute of limitation expires. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized as part of the provision for income taxes and are accrued beginning in the period that such interest and penalties would be applicable under relevant tax law until such time that the related tax benefits are recognized.

Foreign currencies:

For the Company’s foreign subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and France, whose functional currency is the U.S. Dollar, monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at current rates, non-monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at historical rates, and revenues and expenses are translated at average rates on a monthly basis throughout the year. Resulting differences from the remeasurement process are recognized in income and reported as other income.

The functional currency of the Company’s Canadian subsidiary is the Canadian Dollar. Assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates. Income statement accounts are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Translation adjustments are reported as a component of shareholders’ equity and are not included in income.

Transactions and balances denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the transacting entity are remeasured at current rates when the transaction occurs and at each balance sheet date. Transaction gains and losses are included in net income for the period.

Stock-based compensation:

Stock-based compensation is accounted for as required by the FASB’s authoritative guidance. The Company has applied the modified-prospective-transition method. Under the modified-prospective-transition

 

59


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

method, compensation costs recognized during all years presented included: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payment arrangements granted but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original stock-based compensation guidance, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payment arrangements granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the current stock-based compensation guidance. The Company utilizes a “graded vesting” approach to recognize compensation expense over the vesting period of the stock award. For employees who have reached retirement age, the Company recognizes compensation expense at the date of grant. For employees approaching retirement eligibility, the Company amortizes compensation expense over the period from the grant date through the retirement eligibility date.

Cash flows resulting from the windfall tax benefits from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized (“excess tax benefits”) are classified as financing cash inflows. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, operating cash flows were decreased and financing cash flows were increased by $302, $380, and $39, respectively.

Total compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for stock-based compensation arrangements was $4,599, $3,847, and $4,399 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for stock-based compensation arrangements was $2,060, $2,735, and $1,320 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. There was no compensation cost capitalized in inventory or fixed assets for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009.

New Accounting Standards:

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS.” The new guidance amends current fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements to include expansion of the information required for “Level 3” measurements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and are to be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income – Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” This ASU requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, and apply retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of this ASU, as amended by ASU No. 2011-12, which deferred certain portions of ASU No. 2011-05, during the fourth quarter of 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Impairment – Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” This ASU added an optional qualitative analysis to the yearly testing for goodwill impairment. Depending on the outcome of this analysis, the quantitative two-step process could be eliminated for the year the analysis is performed. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

60


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” This new guidance requires the disclosure of both net and gross information in the notes for relevant assets and liabilities that are offset. This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is evaluating the impact of this guidance.

Note 3—ACQUISITION:

On November 23, 2011, the Company purchased all of the outstanding common stock of Aeromet Advanced Forming, Ltd. for cash consideration of $35.8 million. Commensurate with the purchase, Aeromet Advanced Forming, Ltd. was renamed RTI Advanced Forming, Ltd. (“Advanced Forming”). Advanced Forming is located in Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, England, and engages in hot forming, super plastic forming, diffusion bonding, and fabrication of titanium sheet and plate for the commercial aerospace and defense markets. Advanced Forming’s results for the period from November 23, 2011 to December 31, 2011 are included in the Fabrication Group segment. For this period, net sales totaled $2.1 million and operating income totaled $(0.1) million after the amortization of fair value adjustments, primarily related to the step up of inventories and plant and equipment, as well as amounts assigned to customer relationships and developed technologies. Pro forma financial information has not been included because the acquisition did not meet certain significance thresholds.

The purchase price allocation, which has not been finalized, is as follows:

 

 

Assets purchased:

  

Current assets, excluding inventory

   $ 5,186   

Inventories

     6,671   

Plant and equipment

     6,262   

Intangible assets:

  

Customer relationships

     5,913   

Developed technologies

     3,890   

Goodwill

     14,303   

Liabilities assumed:

  

Current liabilities

     2,613   

Deferred tax liabilities

     3,614   

Other liabilities

     186   
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

   $ 35,812   
  

 

 

 

Goodwill is primarily attributable to expected synergies from providing titanium mill products from the Titanium Group and Advanced Forming’s assembled workforce and is not deductible for tax purposes. Customer relationships and developed technologies are being amortized over a period of 20 years.

Note 4—EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Earnings per share (“EPS”) amounts for each period are presented in accordance with the FASB’s authoritative guidance which requires the presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share was computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding for each respective period. Diluted earnings per share was calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average of all potentially dilutive shares of Common Stock that were outstanding during the periods presented.

 

61


Table of Contents

RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

 

In December 2010, the Company issued $230 million in senior convertible notes (the “Notes”). The Notes can be settled in cash, stock, or any combination of cash and stock, at the discretion of the Company, i.e., a convertible note with an optional net-share settlement provision. Under the FASB’s authoritative guidance, EPS for convertible notes with an optional net share settlement provision is calculated under the “If Converted” method. Under the If Converted method, EPS is calculated as the more dilutive of EPS including all interest (both cash interest and non-cash discount amortization) and excluding all shares underlying the Notes or excluding all interest (both cash interest and non-cash discount amortization) and including all shares underlying the Notes. For the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, diluted EPS was calculated by including interest expense related to the Notes and excluding the shares underlying the Notes.

Actual weighted-average shares of Common Stock outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, were as follows:

 

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2011      2010      2009  

Numerator:

        

Net income (loss)

   $ 6,552       $ 3,417       $ (67,239
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Denominator:

        

Basic weighted-average shares outstanding

     30,017,677         29,916,465         25,029,976   

Effect of dilutive shares

     239,508         228,634           
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding

     30,257,185         30,145,099         25,029,976   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per share:

        

Basic

   $ 0.22       $ 0.11       $ (2.67

Diluted

   $ 0.22       $ 0.11       $ (2.67

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, options to purchase 251,404; 270,124; and 495,766 shares of Common Stock, at an average price of $47.95, $46.64 and $31.30, respectively, have been excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings (loss) per share because their effects were antidilutive.

Note 5—INCOME TAXES:

The “Provision for income taxes” caption in the Consolidated Statements of Operations includes the following income tax expense (benefit):

 

 

     December 31, 2011     December 31, 2010     December 31, 2009  
     Current     Deferred     Total     Current     Deferred     Total     Current     Deferred     Total  

Federal

   $ (4,417   $ 14,542        10,125      $ (10,554   $ 21,502      $ 10,948      $ (2,270   $ (21,388   $ (23,658

State

     537        (1,091     (554     1,089        1,693        2,782        967        (944     23   

Foreign

     1,077        (5,065     (3,988     1,829        (7,156     (5,327 &