UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
☑ Filed by the registrant | ☐ Filed by a party other than the registrant |
Check the appropriate box:
| ||||
☐
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
| |||
☐
|
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14A-6(E)(2))
| |||
☑
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
| |||
☐
|
Definitive Additional Materials
| |||
☐
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
|
AMGEN INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):
| ||||
☑
|
No fee required.
| |||
☐
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
| |||
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
| |||
☐
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
| |||
☐ |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
| |||
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
(3)
|
Filing Party:
| |||
(4)
|
Date Filed: |
2018 Proxy Statement and Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Robert A. Bradway Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President | ||
|
||
Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799 |
April 11, 2018
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are invited to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting, of Amgen Inc. to be held on Tuesday, May 22, 2018, at 11:00 A.M., local time, at the Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, California 91362.
Our Company: At Amgen, our mission is to serve patients; this mission guides our unwavering commitment to deliver breakthrough treatments for unmet medical needs. In 2017, we secured 80 country/product launches of new medicines in new indications around the world. We advanced the largest early pipeline in Amgens history and set the stage for continued innovation in the years to come. Our products span six therapeutic areas cardiovascular, oncology/hematology, neuroscience, inflammation, nephrology, and bone health and we make a significant difference in the fight against serious illness. We continue to seek new treatments for serious diseases and lowering the cost burden that these diseases place on society.
Business Strategy: Our strategy is clear in six focused therapeutic areas we seek to develop innovative medicines that address important unmet medical needs in the fight against serious illness. Our strategy includes an integrated set of activities we are pursuing to strengthen our competitive position in our industry. In addition to our significant commitment to innovative research and development, we are developing branded biosimilars, expanding our global geographic reach, deploying next-generation biomanufacturing facilities, improving drug delivery systems, adhering to a disciplined approach to capital allocation while investing for long-term growth, and transforming Amgen for the future. In the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy, we further discuss our progress for 2017 against these objectives. In 2017, we had consistent, strong execution of our strategy and remained focused on generating long-term stockholder value and built on a strong record of delivering superior returns to our stockholders. A clear measure of our success is the number of patients reached and helped by our medicines throughout the world.
Stockholder Engagement: We are also guided by the perspectives of our stockholders as expressed through direct engagement with us throughout the year and at our Annual Meeting. Since our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, in addition to our outreach by our executives and Investor Relations department to investors, we have engaged in governance-focused outreach activities and discussions with the governance teams for stockholders comprising approximately 52% of our outstanding shares. Topics discussed included our business and financial performance, our governance and executive compensation programs, including the direct link to our business strategy, and our corporate responsibility and sustainability initiatives. Feedback received during these meetings is shared with the full Board of Directors and informed Board decisions. The conversations held with our stockholders are beneficial, and we look forward to continuing our dialogue in the coming year.
I look forward to sharing more about our Company at the Annual Meeting. In addition to the business to be transacted and described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, I will discuss recent developments during the past year, the substantial progress we made on our strategic priorities for 2017, and respond to comments and questions.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I thank you for your participation and investment in Amgen. We look forward to seeing you on May 22. As a final note and also on behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to thank David Baltimore and François de Carbonnel who are not standing for re-election, for their years of wise counsel and guidance for Amgen.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Bradway
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President
Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, California 91320-1799 |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To be Held on May 22, 2018
To the Stockholders of Amgen Inc.:
Date and Time: |
Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 11:00 A.M., local time | |||
Location: |
Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, California 91362 | |||
Record Date: |
March 23, 2018. Amgen stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and vote at, the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting, and any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof. | |||
Mail Date: |
We intend to mail the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, or the proxy statement and proxy card, as applicable, on or about April 11, 2018 to our stockholders of record on the record date. | |||
Items of Business: | ||||
1. |
To elect 13 directors to the Board of Directors of Amgen for a term of office expiring at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders. The nominees for election to the Board of Directors are Dr. Wanda M. Austin, Mr. Robert A. Bradway, Dr. Brian J. Druker, Mr. Robert A. Eckert, Mr. Greg C. Garland, Mr. Fred Hassan, Dr. Rebecca M. Henderson, Mr. Frank C. Herringer, Mr. Charles M. Holley, Jr., Dr. Tyler Jacks, Ms. Ellen J. Kullman, Dr. Ronald D. Sugar and Dr. R. Sanders Williams; | |||
2. |
To hold an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation; | |||
3. |
To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018; | |||
4. |
To consider one stockholder proposal for an annual report on the extent to which risks related to public concern over drug pricing strategies are integrated into our executive incentive compensation, if properly presented at the meeting; and | |||
5. |
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof. | |||
Attendance: If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need an admittance ticket and proof of ownership of our Common Stock as of the close of business on March 23, 2018. Please read INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATIONAttendance at the Annual Meeting in the accompanying proxy statement. |
Voting: Your vote is important, regardless of the number of shares that you own. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. Please read the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement with care and follow the voting instructions to ensure that your shares are represented. By submitting your proxy promptly, you will save the Company the expense of further proxy solicitation. We encourage you to submit your proxy as soon as possible by Internet, by telephone or by signing, dating and returning all proxy cards or instruction forms provided to you.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Jonathan P. Graham
Secretary
Thousand Oaks, California
April 11, 2018
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
This summary contains highlights about our Company and the upcoming 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in advance of the meeting and we encourage you to read the entire proxy statement before voting.
2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Date and Time: |
Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 11:00 A.M., local time | |
Location: |
Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, California 91362 | |
Record Date: |
March 23, 2018 | |
Mail Date: |
We intend to mail the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, or the proxy statement and proxy card, as applicable, on or about April 11, 2018 to our stockholders. |
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
Matter
|
Our Board Vote Recommendation
| |||
Item 1:
|
Election of 13 Nominees to the Board of Directors (page 7)
|
FOR each Director Nominee
| ||
Item 2:
|
Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation (page 27)
|
FOR
| ||
Item 3:
|
Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants (page 86)
|
FOR
| ||
Item 4:
|
Stockholder Proposal For An Annual Report on the Extent To Which Risks Related to Public Concern Over Drug Pricing Strategies Are Integrated Into Our Executive Incentive Compensation (page 88)
|
AGAINST
|
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 1
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
9 new Directors since 2012 8 Experienced Current and Former Public Company 6 Directors w/ Scientific Research and/or CEO/CFO Healthcare Experience 5 Directors with Financial Industry Experience 3 Women PROXY ACCESS FOR DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS 92% INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS* LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR 9 NEW DIRECTORS SINCE 2012* ~4.8 YEARS AVERAGE TENURE*8 CURRENT/FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY CEO/CFOs
Item 1: Election of 13 Nominees to the Board of Directors (Page 7)
Nominee |
Age | |
Director Since |
|
Audit |
|
Governance and Nominating |
|
Executive |
|
Compensation and Management Development |
|
|
Equity Award |
|
|
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance |
| ||||||||||||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
63
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
55
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian J. Druker(1)
|
|
62
|
|
|
Initial Election
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
63
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
C
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
60
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Fred Hassan
|
|
72
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
57
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Frank C. Herringer
|
|
75
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
|
|
61
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
57
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
62
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
69
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
C
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
69
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
C | indicates Chair of the committee. |
M | indicates member of the committee. |
(1) | Dr. Druker is standing for initial election to the Board of Directors, or Board. Dr. Druker has been appointed to the Audit Committee and the Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Committee, effective as of the Annual Meeting and subject to his election to the Board by our stockholders. |
Corporate Governance Highlights and Best Practices
* | For our director nominees. |
2 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
We Have Implemented Governance Best Practices
We continuously monitor developments and best practices in corporate governance and consider stockholder feedback when enhancing our governance structures. Below are highlights of our key governance practices:
✓ | Proxy Access (pages 17 and 96) |
- | up to 20 eligible stockholders that own 3% of shares |
- | for 3 years who meet the requirements set forth in our Bylaws |
- | can nominate the greater of 20% or two nominees |
✓ | Majority Voting Standard for Director Elections (pages 16 and 94) |
✓ | Stockholders May Act By Written Consent (page 17) |
✓ | Stockholders Have a Right to Call Special Meetings (15% threshold requirement) (page 17) |
✓ | No Supermajority Vote Provisions in Articles or Bylaws (page 17) |
✓ | Highly Independent Board 12 of our 13 director nominees (page 21) |
✓ | Strong Refreshment Practices With 9 New Directors Since 2012 Average Board tenure of approximately 4.8 years for our director nominees (pages 8 and 16) |
✓ | Annual Anonymous Board and Committee Evaluation Process (page 21) |
✓ | All Directors Meet Our Board of Directors Guidelines for Director Qualifications and Evaluations (Appendix A) |
✓ | Robust Lead Independent Director Role (page 17) |
✓ | Significant Stock Ownership Requirements for Directors and Officers (pages 59 and 79) |
✓ | Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Committee (page 23) |
✓ | Enterprise Risk Management Program and Annual Detailed Compensation Risk Analysis overseen by Board and Compensation and Management Development Committee, respectively (pages 18 and 26) |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE 13 NAMED NOMINEES.
|
||||
|
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 3
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
Item 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive
Compensation (Page 27)
2017 Target Total Direct Compensation Mix
| We pay for performance, and pay outcomes reflect the achievements of our Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, against our strategic priorities. |
| We use median values as the reference point for each element of compensation at all levels, including our NEOs. We consider performance, job scope, and contribution in our final pay decisions. |
| Our compensation program is directly linked to our performance and strategy. Each year, our Compensation and Management Development Committee approves Company performance goals under our annual cash incentive programs that are designed to focus our staff on delivering financial and operational objectives to drive annual performance, advance strategic priorities, and position us for longer-term success. Based on our overall performance in 2017 compared to the pre-established Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program, we achieved 115% of our target bonus opportunity. |
| Performance units earned for the 2015-2017 (January 30, 2015 to January 30, 2018) performance period were based on an earned payout percentage of 93.4% reflecting the Companys three-year Total Shareholder Return, or TSR, performance at the 46.7th percentile relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Standard & Poors 500 Index, or S&P 500, during the performance period. Our beginning stock price and ending stock price for purposes of the 2015-2017 performance period are each the average daily closing price of a share of our Common Stock for the beginning and last twenty trading days of the performance period ($154.49 and $186.61, respectively). Separately, but of note, Amgens 2015-2017 three-year TSR (30.0%) outperformed that of the average TSR of our 2017 peer group (11.6%). |
Long-term Incentive Equity Awards Target Annual Cash Incentive Base Salary CEO 90% Pay at Risk 75% Performance based Other NEOs 82% Pay at Risk 69% Performance based
4 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
2017 Performance
(1) | Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles net income for purposes of the 2017 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION INDICATING THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANYS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
|
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 5
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
Item 3: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants (Page 86)
| The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP, or Ernst & Young, as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. |
| Ernst & Young has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since the Companys inception in 1980. |
| Each year, the Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications and performance of the Companys independent registered public accountants and determines whether to re-engage the current independent registered public accountants. |
| Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of Ernst & Young is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS.
|
||||
|
Item 4: Stockholder Proposal (Page 88)
| Stockholders have informed the Company that they intend to present a proposal at our Annual Meeting. |
| The proposal relates to the request for an annual report on the extent to which risks related to public concern over drug pricing strategies are integrated into our executive incentive compensation. |
| The Board has thoroughly considered the proposal and believes that it is NOT in the Companys or stockholders best interests for the reasons identified starting on page 89 of the proxy statement, which include the following: |
- | The proposals underlying subject matter is our drug pricing and capital allocation decisions. Such decisions are integral to our ordinary course operations and the proposed report would put us at a competitive disadvantage and be unduly burdensome while not providing meaningful additional information to stockholders; |
- | We already provide public disclosure regarding the factors that are integrated into our incentive compensation policies and the risks related to compensation; and |
- | We remain focused on delivering breakthrough treatments for unmet medical needs and are committed to working with the entire healthcare community to ensure continued innovation and enable patient access to needed medicines. |
THE BOARD STRONGLY AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR AN ANNUAL REPORT ON THE EXTENT TO WHICH RISKS RELATED TO PUBLIC CONCERN OVER DRUG PRICING STRATEGIES ARE INTEGRATED INTO OUR EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION.
|
6 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Election of Directors
Nominees to the Board
Nominee |
Age |
Director Since |
Audit |
Governance and Nominating |
Executive |
Compensation and Management Development |
Equity Award |
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance | ||||||||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
63
|
|
|
2017
|
|
M
|
M
| ||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
55
|
|
|
2011
|
|
C
|
M
|
||||||||||||
Brian J. Druker(1)
|
|
62
|
|
|
Initial Election
|
|
||||||||||||||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
63
|
|
|
2012
|
|
M
|
M
|
C
|
C
|
||||||||||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
60
|
|
|
2013
|
|
C
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
||||||||||
Fred Hassan
|
|
72
|
|
|
2015
|
|
M
|
M
|
||||||||||||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
57
|
|
|
2009
|
|
M
|
M
| ||||||||||||
Frank C. Herringer
|
|
75
|
|
|
2004
|
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
|||||||||||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
|
|
61
|
|
|
2017
|
|
C
|
M
| ||||||||||||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
57
|
|
|
2012
|
|
M
|
M
|
||||||||||||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
62
|
|
|
2016
|
|
M
|
M
|
||||||||||||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
69
|
|
|
2010
|
|
M
|
M
|
C
| |||||||||||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
69
|
|
|
2014
|
|
M
|
M
|
C | indicates Chair of the committee. |
M | indicates member of the committee. |
(1) | Dr. Druker is standing for initial election to the Board. Dr. Druker has been appointed to the Audit Committee and the Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Committee, effective as of the Annual Meeting and subject to his election to the Board by our stockholders. |
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 7
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
* | For our director nominees. |
Summary of Director Nominee Core Experiences and Skills
Our Board possesses a deep and broad set of skills and experiences that facilitate strong oversight and strategic direction for a leading global innovator in biomedicine. The following chart summarizes the competencies of each director nominee to be represented on our Board. The details of each directors competencies are included in each directors profile.
The lack of a ✓ for a particular item does not mean that the director does not possess that qualification, characteristic, skill or experience. Each of our Board members have experience and/or skills in the enumerated areas, however, the ✓ is designed to indicate that a director has particular strength in that area.
9 new Directors since 2012 8 Experienced Current and Former Public Company 6 Directors w/ Scientific Research and/or CEO/CFO Healthcare Experience 5 Directors with Financial Industry Experience 3 Women Experience / Skills Austin Bradway Druker Eckert Garland Hassan Henderson Herringer Holley Jacks Kullman Sugar Williams Healthcare Industry, Providers and Payers Science/Technology Public Company CEO/COO/CFO Regulatory Compliance Financial/Accounting Government/Public Policy International
8 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE NAMED NOMINEES. PROXIES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
Set forth below is biographical information for each nominee and a summary of the specific qualifications, attributes, skills and experiences which led our Board to conclude that each nominee should serve on the Board at this time. All of our directors meet the qualifications and skills of our Amgen Inc. Board of Directors Guidelines for Director Qualifications and Evaluations included in this proxy statement as Appendix A. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or among any of our directors and our executive officers.
Wanda M. Austin
Director since: 2017
Age: 63
Committees: Audit Corporate Responsibility and Compliance
Other Public Company Boards: Chevron Corporation
|
Wanda M. Austin has served as a director of the Company since December 11, 2017. Dr. Austin was first identified to the Governance and Nominating Committee as a potential director candidate by a non-employee member of the Board. She is the retired President and Chief Executive Officer of The Aerospace Corporation, a leading architect of the United States national security space programs, where she served from 2008 until her retirement in 2016. From 2004 to 2007, Dr. Austin was Senior Vice President, National Systems Group of The Aerospace Corporation. Dr. Austin joined The Aerospace Corporation in 1979 and served in various positions from 1979 until 2004.
Dr. Austin has served as an Adjunct Research Professor at the University of Southern Californias Viterbi School of Engineering since 2007. She is the co-founder of MakingSpace, where she serves as a motivational speaker on STEM education. Dr. Austin has been a director of Chevron Corporation, a petroleum, exploration, production and refining company, since 2016, serving on its Board Nominating and Governance Committee and Public Policy Committee. Dr. Austin is a trustee of the University of Southern | |
California and previously served on the boards of directors of the National Geographic Society and the Space Foundation. Dr. Austin received an undergraduate degree from Franklin & Marshall College, a masters degree from the University of Pittsburgh and a doctorate from the University of Southern California. She is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Austin should serve on the Board based on her leadership and management experience as a chief executive officer, her extensive background in science, technology, and government affairs in a highly regulated industry, and her public board experience. |
Robert A. Bradway
Director since: 2011
Age: 55
Committees: Equity Award Executive (Chair)
Other Public Company Boards: The Boeing Company
|
Robert A. Bradway has served as our director since 2011 and Chairman of the Board since 2013. Mr. Bradway has been our President since 2010 and Chief Executive Officer since 2012. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Bradway served as our Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Bradway joined Amgen in 2006 as Vice President, Operations Strategy and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2007 to 2010. Prior to joining Amgen, he was a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley in London where, beginning in 2001, he had responsibility for the firms banking department and corporate finance activities in Europe.
Mr. Bradway has been a director of The Boeing Company, an aerospace company and manufacturer of commercial airplanes, defense, space and securities systems, since 2016, serving on its Audit and Finance committees. From 2011 to May 2017, Mr. Bradway was a director of Norfolk Southern Corporation, a transportation company. He has served on the board of trustees of the University of Southern California | |
since 2014 and on the advisory board of the Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics at that university since 2012. Mr. Bradway holds a bachelors degree in biology from Amherst College and a masters degree in business administration from Harvard Business School.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Bradway should serve on the Board based on his thorough knowledge of all aspects of our business, combined with his leadership and management skills having previously served as our President and Chief Operating Officer and as our Chief Financial Officer. |
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 9
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Brian J. Druker
Director since: Standing for initial election to the Board
Age: 62
Committees: If elected by stockholders, Dr. Druker is expected to serve on the following committees: Audit Corporate Responsibility and Compliance
|
Brian J. Druker is standing for initial election to the Companys Board and will be appointed as a director effective as of the Companys 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders subject to his election by stockholders. Dr. Druker was first identified to the Governance and Nominating Committee as a potential director candidate by non-employee members of the Board. He joined Oregon Health & Science University, or OHSU, in 1993 and is currently a physician-scientist and professor of medicine. Dr. Druker has served as the director of the OHSU Knight Cancer Institute since 2007, associate dean for oncology of the OHSU School of Medicine since 2010, and the JELD-WEN chair of leukemia research at OHSU since 2001. He has been an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, a nonprofit medical research organization, since 2002.
Dr. Druker has served on the scientific advisory boards of Aptose Biosciences Inc., a biotechnology company, since 2013, and Grail, Inc., a biotechology company, since 2016. In 2011, he founded Blueprint Medicines Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company, and remains as a scientific advisor to this company. In 2006, he founded MolecularMD, a privately-held molecular diagnostics company. |
Dr. Druker has received numerous awards, including the Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Research Award in 2009, the Japan Prize in Healthcare and Medical Technology in 2012, and the Albany Medical Center Prize in 2013, for influential work in the development of STI571 (Gleevec®) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 2012 as well as the National Academy of Medicine in 2007. Dr. Druker received both an undergraduate degree and his doctorate from the University of California, San Diego.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Druker should serve on the Board based on his extensive scientific research and expertise leading an important academic institution, conducting highly significant research in the area of oncology, and directly managing the care of cancer patients. |
Robert A. Eckert
Lead Independent Director
Director since: 2012
Age: 63
Committees: Compensation and Management Equity Award (Chair) Executive Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: McDonalds Corporation |
Robert A. Eckert is our lead independent director. Mr. Eckert has been an Operating Partner at Friedman Fleischer & Lowe, a private equity firm, since 2014. Mr. Eckert was the Chief Executive Officer of Mattel, Inc., a toy design, manufacture and marketing company, having held this position from 2000 through 2011, and its Chairman of the Board from 2000 through 2012. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Kraft Foods Inc., a consumer packaged food and beverage company, from 1997 to 2000, Group Vice President from 1995 to 1997, President of the Oscar Mayer Foods Division from 1993 to 1995 and held various other senior executive and other positions from 1977 to 1992.
Mr. Eckert has been a director of McDonalds Corporation, a company which franchises and operates McDonalds restaurants in the global restaurant industry, since 2003, serving as the Chair of the Public Policy and Strategy Committee and a member of the Executive and Governance Committees. Mr. Eckert was a director of Smart & Final Stores, Inc., a warehouse store, from 2013 until 2014 prior to it becoming a publicly-traded company. Mr. Eckert also has served as a director of Levi Strauss & Co., a privately-held jeans and casual wear manufacturer, since 2010. He was appointed director of Eyemart Express Holdings LLC, a privately-held eyewear retailer and portfolio company of Friedman Fleischer & Lowe, in 2015. Mr. Eckert is on the Global Advisory Board of the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and serves on the Eller College National Board of Advisors at the University of Arizona. Mr. Eckert received an undergraduate degree from the University of Arizona and a master's degree in business administration from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Eckert should serve on our Board because of Mr. Eckerts long-tenured experience as a chief executive officer of large public companies, his broad international experience in marketing and business development, and his valuable leadership experience.
10 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Greg C. Garland
Director since: 2013
Age: 60
Committees: Compensation and Management Development Equity Award Executive Governance and Nominating (Chair)
Other Public Company Boards: Phillips 66(1)
|
Greg C. Garland is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Phillips 66, an energy manufacturing and logistics company with midstream, chemical, refining and marketing and specialties businesses created through the repositioning of ConocoPhillips, having held this position since 2012. Mr. Garland chairs the Executive Committee of Phillips 66.(1) Prior to Phillips 66, Mr. Garland served as Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production, Americas of ConocoPhillips from 2010 to 2012. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company (now a joint venture between Phillips 66 and Chevron) from 2008 to 2010 and Senior Vice President, Planning and Specialty Chemicals from 2000 to 2008. Mr. Garland served in various positions at Phillips Petroleum Company from 1980 to 2000. Mr. Garland is a member of the Engineering Advisory Council for Texas A&M University. Mr. Garland received an undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Garland should serve on our Board because of Mr. Garlands experience as a chief executive officer and his over 30 years of international experience in a highly regulated industry. | |
(1) | Mr. Garland also serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Phillips 66 Partners LP, a master limited partnership and wholly-owned subsidiary of Phillips 66 without any employees. |
Fred Hassan
Director since: 2015
Age: 72
Committees: Audit Compensation and
Management
Other Public Company Boards: Intrexon Corporation Time Warner Inc.
Audit Committee financial expert
|
Fred Hassan is Special Limited Partner at Warburg Pincus LLC, a global private equity investment institution, since 2017. Mr. Hassan was Partner and Managing Director at Warburg Pincus LLC from 2011 to 2017 and, prior to that, served as Senior Advisor from 2009 to 2010. Mr. Hassan was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Schering-Plough Corporation from 2003 to 2009. Prior to this, Mr. Hassan was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia Corporation, from 2001 to 2003. Before assuming these roles, he had served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia Corporation from its creation in 2000 as a result of the merger of Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. with Monsanto Company. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. beginning in 1997. Mr. Hassan previously held senior positions with Wyeth (formerly known as American Home Products), including that of Executive Vice President with responsibility for its pharmaceutical and medical products businesses, and served as a member of the board from 1995 to 1997. Prior to that, Mr. Hassan held various roles at Sandoz Pharmaceuticals and headed its U.S. pharmaceuticals businesses.
Mr. Hassan has been a director of Time Warner Inc., a media company, since 2009, serving on its Nominating and Governance and Compensation and Human Development Committees; and Intrexon Corporation, a synthetic biology company, since 2016, serving on its Compensation Committee. Mr. Hassan was a director of Avon Products, Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of beauty and related products, | |
from 1999 until 2013 and served on its Compensation and Management Development, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Audit Committees, as lead independent director from 2009 to 2012, and Chairman of the Board between January and April 2013. Mr. Hassan was Chairman of the Board of Bausch & Lomb, from 2010 until its acquisition by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, in 2013. Mr. Hassan served on the board of directors and Compensation and Audit Committees of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. from 2013 to 2014. Mr. Hassan received an undergraduate degree from Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London and a masters degree in business administration from Harvard Business School.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Hassan should serve on the Board based on his global experience as a public company chief executive officer, his particular knowledge and experience in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries, including overseeing businesses with significant research and development operations, his diversified financial and business expertise, as well as prior public company board experience. Given his financial and leadership experience, Mr. Hassan has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert by our Board. |
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 11
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Rebecca M. Henderson
Director since: 2009
Age: 57
Committees: Audit Corporate Responsibility and Compliance
Other Public Company Boards: IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. |
Rebecca M. Henderson has been the John and Natty McArthur University Professor at Harvard University since 2011. From 2009 to 2011, Dr. Henderson served as the Senator John Heinz Professor of Environmental Management at Harvard Business School. Prior to this, she was a professor of management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT, for 21 years, having been the Eastman Kodak LFM Professor of Management since 1999. Since 1995, she has also been a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. She specializes in technology strategy and the broader strategic problems faced by companies in high technology industries.
Dr. Henderson has been a director of IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., a company which provides diagnostic and information technology-based products and services for veterinary, food and water applications, since 2003, chairing its Finance Committee and serving on its Nominating and Governance Committee. Dr. Henderson has also served as a director of the Ember Corporation, a privately-held semiconductor chip manufacturer, and on its Compensation Committee, from 2001 to July 2009. She has further been a |
director of Linbeck Construction Corporation, a privately-held facility solutions company, from 2000 until 2004. Dr. Henderson has published articles, papers and reviews in a range of scholarly journals. Dr. Henderson received an undergraduate degree from MIT and a doctorate from Harvard University.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Henderson should serve on the Board because Dr. Hendersons study of the complex strategy issues faced by high technology companies provides valuable insight into the Companys strategic and technology issues.
Frank C. Herringer
Director since: 2004
Age: 75
Committees: Audit Executive Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: The Charles Schwab Corporation
Audit Committee financial expert |
Frank C. Herringer has been a director of the Board of Transamerica Corporation, a financial services company since 1986, serving as Chairman of the board of directors from 1995 to 2015. Mr. Herringer was an executive with Transamerica for 20 years, including its Chief Executive Officer from 1991 until its acquisition by Aegon N.V., a life insurance, pensions and asset management company, in 1999, subsequently serving on Aegons Executive Board for one year. Mr. Herringer was a director of Aegon U.S. Holding Corporation from 1999 until its merger into Transamerica Corporation in 2015.
Mr. Herringer has been a director of The Charles Schwab Corporation, a brokerage and banking company, since 1996, serving on its Compensation Committee and chairing its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Herringer is a member of the Board of Trustees of the California Pacific Medical Center Foundation, a not-for-profit organization which develops philanthropic resources for the California Pacific Medical Center, a privately-held, not-for-profit academic medical center, since 2013. Mr. Herringer was a director of Safeway Inc., a food and drug retailer, from 2008 until 2015, serving on its Executive Compensation and Executive Committees and chairing its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Herringer was a director of Cardax, Inc., a biotechnology company, from 2014 to 2015, serving on its Compensation Committee and chairing its Governance and Nominating Committee, | |
and was a director of its parent company, Cardax Pharmaceuticals, Inc., from 2006 until 2015. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Herringer was a director of AT&T Corporation, and a member of its Audit and Compensation Committees. In 2004, Mr. Herringer was named an Outstanding Director of the Year by the Outstanding Directors Exchange. Mr. Herringer received an undergraduate degree and masters degree in business administration from Dartmouth College.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Herringer should serve on the Board based on his background as chief executive officer and board chair of a public company, his management and leadership skills, and his career-long focus on corporate financial performance, prospects and strategy. Given his financial and leadership experience, Mr. Herringer has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert by our Board. |
12 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
Director since: 2017
Age: 61
Committees: Audit (Chair) Corporate
Responsibility and Compliance
Audit Committee financial expert
|
Charles M. Holley, Jr. is the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., or Walmart, where he served from 2010 to 2015 and as Executive Vice President between January 1, 2016 and January 31, 2016. Prior to this, Mr. Holley served as Executive Vice President, Finance and Treasurer of Walmart from 2007 to 2010. From 2005 to 2006, he served as Senior Vice President. Prior to that, Mr. Holley was Senior Vice President and Controller from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Holley served various roles in Wal-Mart International from 1994 through 2002. Prior to this, Mr. Holley served in various roles at Tandy Corporation. He spent more than ten years with Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Holley is an Independent Senior Advisor, U.S. CFO Program, Deloitte LLP, a privately-held provider of audit, consulting, tax, and advisory services, since 2016.
Mr. Holley serves on the Advisory Council for the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Texas Presidents Development Board. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Holley should serve on the Board based on his experience as a chief financial officer of a global public company, his financial acumen, and his management and leadership skills. Given his financial and leadership experience, Mr. Holley has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert by our Board. |
Tyler Jacks
Director since: 2012
Age: 57
Committees: Audit Compensation and Management Development
Other Public Company Boards: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
|
Tyler Jacks joined the faculty of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT, in 1992 and is currently the David H. Koch Professor of Biology and director of the David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, which brings together biologists and engineers to improve detection, diagnosis and treatment of cancer, a position he has held since 2007. Dr. Jacks has been an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, a nonprofit medical research organization, since 1994.
Dr. Jacks has been a director of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., a life sciences supply company, since 2009, serving on its Strategy and Finance Committee and scientific advisory board and chairing its Science and Technology Committee. In 2006, he co-founded T2 Biosystems, Inc., a biotechnology company, and served on its scientific advisory board until 2013. Dr. Jacks has served on the scientific advisory board of SQZ Biotech, a privately-held biotechnology company, since 2015. He was a consultant scientific advisor to Epizyme, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from 2007 to 2017. Dr. Jacks served on the scientific advisory board of Aveo Pharmaceuticals Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from 2001 until 2013. In 2015, Dr. Jacks founded Dragonfly Therapeutics, Inc., a privately-held biopharmaceutical company, and serves as co-Chair of its scientific advisory board. He was appointed to the National Cancer | |
Advisory Board, which advises and assists the Director of the National Cancer Institute with respect to the National Cancer Program, in 2011 and served as Chair until 2016. In 2016, Dr. Jacks was named to a blue ribbon panel of scientists and advisors established as a working group of the National Cancer Advisory Board and served as co-Chair advising the Cancer MoonshotSM Task Force. Dr. Jacks was a director of MITs Center for Cancer Research from 2001 to 2007 and received numerous awards including the Paul Marks Prize for Cancer Research and the American Association for Cancer Research Award for Outstanding Achievement. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences as well as the National Academy of Medicine in 2009 and received the MIT Killian Faculty Achievement Award in 2015. Dr. Jacks received an undergraduate degree from Harvard University and his doctorate from the University of California, San Francisco.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Jacks should serve on the Board based on his extensive scientific expertise relevant to our industry, including his broad experience as a cancer researcher, pioneering uses of technology to study cancer-associated genes, and service on several scientific advisory boards and membership in the National Cancer Advisory Board. |
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 13
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Ellen J. Kullman
Director since: 2016
Age: 62
Committees: Audit Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. United Technologies Corporation
Audit Committee financial expert
|
Ellen J. Kullman is the former President, Chair and Chief Executive Officer of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, or DuPont, a science and technology-based company, where she served from 2009 to 2015. Prior to this, Ms. Kullman served as President of DuPont from 2008 to 2009. From 2006 through 2008, she served as Executive Vice President of DuPont. Prior to that, Ms. Kullman was Group Vice President, DuPont Safety and Protection. Ms. Kullman has been a director of United Technologies Corporation, a technology products and services company, since 2011, serving on its Committee on Compensation and Executive Development and chairing its Committee on Governance and Public Policy. Ms. Kullman has been a director of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., an investment banking firm, since 2016, serving on its Compensation, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Risk Committees. Ms. Kullman served as a director of General Motors, from 2004 to 2008, serving on its Audit Committee.
Ms. Kullman has also served as a director of Carbon3D, Inc., a privately-held 3D printing company, since 2016. Ms. Kullman has served on the Board of Trustees of Northwestern University since 2016 and on the Board of Overseers of Tufts University School of Engineering since 2006. She served as Chair of the US-China Business Council from 2013 to 2015. In 2016, Ms. Kullman joined the board of directors of Dell |
Technologies, a privately-held technology company, and the Temasek Americas Advisory Panel of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, a privately-held investment company based in Singapore. Ms. Kullman received a bachelor of science in mechanical engineering degree from Tufts University and a masters degree from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Ms. Kullman should serve on the Board based on her lengthy global experience as a public company chief executive officer and board chair, her management and leadership skills, and her experience with scientific operations, all of which provide valuable insight into the operations of our Company. Given her leadership and financial experience, Ms. Kullman has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert by our Board. |
Ronald D. Sugar
Director since: 2010
Age: 69
Committees: Corporate Responsibility and Compliance (Chair) Executive Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Air Lease Corporation Apple Inc. Chevron Corporation
|
Ronald D. Sugar is the retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Northrop Grumman Corporation, a global aerospace and defense company, having held these posts from 2003 through 2009.
Dr. Sugar has been a director of Chevron Corporation, a petroleum, exploration, production and refining company, since 2005, serving as the lead director and on the Management Compensation Committee and chairing the Board Nominating and Governance Committee. Dr. Sugar has been a director of Apple Inc., a manufacturer and seller of, among other things, personal computers, mobile communication and media devices, since 2010, chairing the Audit and Finance Committee. Dr. Sugar has been a director of Air Lease Corporation, an aircraft leasing company, since 2010, chairing the Compensation Committee and serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Since 2010, he has been a senior advisor to Ares Management LLC, a privately-held asset manager and registered investment advisor. In 2014, Dr. Sugar joined the Temasek Americas Advisory Panel of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, a privately-held investment company based in Singapore. Dr. Sugar is a member of the National Academy of Engineering, trustee of the University of Southern California, member of the UCLA Anderson School of Management Board of Advisors, and director of the Los Angeles Philharmonic Association. | |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Sugar should serve on our Board because Dr. Sugars board and senior executive-level expertise, including his experience as chief executive officer and board chair of a large, highly regulated, public company and his insight in the areas of operations, government affairs, science, technology and finance. |
14 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
R. Sanders Williams
Director since: 2014
Age: 69
Committees: Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
|
R. Sanders Williams is the Chief Executive Officer of Gladstone Foundation, a not-for-profit organization supporting the Gladstone Institutes, a non-profit biomedical research enterprise, and President Emeritus of Gladstone Institutes since 2018. Dr. Williams has been a Professor of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco since 2010. Dr. Williams was both President of Gladstone Institutes and its Robert W. and Linda L. Mahley Distinguished Professor of Medicine, from 2010 to 2017. Prior to this, Dr. Williams served as Senior Vice Chancellor of the Duke University School of Medicine from 2008 to 2010 and Dean of the Duke University School of Medicine from 2001 to 2008. He was the founding Dean of the Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, from 2003 to 2008 and served on its Governing Board from 2003 to 2010. From 1990 to 2001, Dr. Williams was Chief of Cardiology and Director of the Ryburn Center for Molecular Cardiology at the University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center.
Dr. Williams has been a director of the Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, a diagnostic technologies company, since 2007, serving on the Audit Committee and chairing the Quality and Compliance Committee. Dr. Williams was a director of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a pharmaceutical |
company, from 2006 until 2013. Dr. Williams has served on the board of directors of the Gladstone Foundation, a non-profit institution that is distinct from Gladstone Institutes, since 2012 and on the board of directors of Exploratorium, a non-profit science museum and learning center located in San Francisco, since 2011. Dr. Williams was elected to the National Academy of Medicine in 2002. Dr. Williams received his undergraduate degree from Princeton University and his doctorate from Duke University.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Williams should serve on the Board because of his broad medical and scientific background, including his leadership roles in domestic and academic science settings, his deep experience in cardiology, oversight of governance of multi-hospital healthcare provider systems, leadership and development of international medical programs in Asia, and prior industry board experience. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE ABOVE 13 NAMED NOMINEES.
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 15
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of the Board are structured to oversee specific risks, as follows:
Committee
|
Primary Risk Oversight Responsibility
|
|||
Audit Committee |
Oversees financial risk, such as capital risk, financial compliance risk and internal controls over financial reporting.
|
|||
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Committee |
Oversees non-financial compliance risk, such as regulatory risks associated with the requirements of the Federal health care program, Food and Drug Administration, and the Corporate Integrity Agreement, and risks associated with pricing and access, information security, including cybersecurity, and our reputation. Also oversees staff member compliance with the Code of Conduct.
|
|||
Compensation and Management Development Committee |
Evaluates whether the right management talent is in place and oversees succession planning. Also oversees our compensation policies and practices, including whether such policies and practices balance risk-taking and rewards in an appropriate manner as discussed further below.
|
|||
Governance and Nominating Committee |
Oversees the assessment of each member of the Boards independence, as well as the effectiveness of our Corporate Governance Principles and Board of Directors Code of Conduct.
|
At each regular meeting, or more frequently as needed, the Board considers reports from each of the committees set forth above, which reports may provide additional detail on risk management issues and managements response.
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 19
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Director Qualifications and Review of Board Diversity
20 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Regular Board and Committee Evaluations
The Board and the Audit, Compensation, Compliance and Governance Committees each have an annual evaluation process which focuses on their roles, effectiveness, and fulfillment of their fiduciary duties.
1. |
Initiation |
Formal annual anonymous evaluations of the full Board as well as the Audit, Compensation, Compliance, and Governance Committees are compiled and distributed Overseen by the Governance Committee
|
||||
2. |
Evaluation and Assessment |
Directors provide feedback regarding Board or committee Composition and structure Role and effectiveness Fulfillment of fiduciary duties Meetings and materials Board interaction with management
|
||||
3. |
Review |
The lead independent director speaks with each member of the Board for one-on-one discussion Each committee and the full Board conduct separate discussions in executive session
|
||||
4. |
Incorporation of Feedback |
Follow-up items are addressed at subsequent Board or committee meetings and any committee actions are reported back to the full Board
|
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 21
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Governance Committee Processes and Procedures for Considering and Determining Director Compensation
Current Members: Charles M. Holley, Jr.* (Chair) (since February 2017 and appointed Chair October 2017) Wanda M. Austin (since December 2017) François de Carbonnel* Fred Hassan* Rebecca M. Henderson Frank C. Herringer* (served as Chair from 2017 Annual Meeting to October 2017) Tyler Jacks Ellen J. Kullman*
*Audit Committee financial expert
Others Who Served in 2017: Frank J. Biondi, Jr. (Chair until retirement at 2017 Annual Meeting) Judith C. Pelham (until retirement at 2017 Annual Meeting)
Number of Meetings Held in 2017: 9
Each member has been determined by the Board to be independent under The NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and the requirements of the SEC, including the requirements regarding financial literacy and sophistication.
|
Description and Key Responsibilities:
Oversees our accounting and financial reporting process and the audits of the financial statements, as required by NASDAQ.
Assists the Board in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities with respect to the oversight of our financial accounting and reporting, the underlying internal controls and procedures over financial reporting, and the audits of the financial statements.
Has sole authority for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accountants.
Reviews and discusses, prior to filing or issuance, with management and the independent registered public accountants (when appropriate) our audited consolidated financial statements to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and earnings press releases.
Approves all related party transactions, as required by NASDAQ. | |||
22 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Codes of Ethics and Business Conduct
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 23
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Our Environmental Sustainability and Social Responsibility Efforts
24 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
2017 Executive Compensation Was Aligned With Our Strategy and Performance
As discussed more fully in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis starting on page 32, a significant majority of each NEOs compensation is at-risk and dependent on our performance and execution of our strategic priorities and the compensation objectives discussed above.
2017 Target Total Direct Compensation Mix
2017 Award Allocation and Performance
2017 Annual Cash Incentive Program
Our annual cash incentive award program compensation is tied directly to our performance based on pre-established financial and operating performance goals that support execution of our strategic priorities. The table below illustrates the weighting of each goal and our actual performance for 2017. Based on our overall performance in 2017 compared to the pre-established Company performance goals, we paid annual cash incentive awards at 115% of target bonus opportunity, a decrease of 44.5 percentage points from our 2016 payout of 159.5% of target bonus opportunity. The following is a summary of our progress against these goals and our strategic priorities. See the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for an expanded discussion.
Goal | Weighting | % of Target Earned |
||||||
1. Financial Performance |
| |||||||
Revenues
|
|
30%
|
|
|
110.6%
|
| ||
Non-GAAP Net Income(1)
|
|
30%
|
|
|
116.8%
|
| ||
2. Progress Innovative Pipeline |
| |||||||
Execute Key Clinical Studies and Regulatory Filings
|
|
20%
|
|
|
123.0%
|
| ||
Advance Early Pipeline
|
|
5%
|
|
|
201.7%
|
| ||
3. Deliver Annual Priorities |
| |||||||
Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives
|
|
10%
|
|
|
76.0%
|
| ||
Realize Functional Transformation Objectives
|
|
5%
|
|
|
90.4%
|
| ||
Composite Score |
|
Achieved 115.0% |
|
(1) | Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or non-GAAP, net income for purposes of the 2017 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
10% 75% 15% At Risk 18% 64% 18% At Risk Long-term Incentive Equity Awards Target Annual Cash Incentive Base Salary CEO 90% Pay at Risk 75% Performance based Other NEOs 82% Pay at Risk 69% Performance based
28 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
ª We Delivered on Our Financial Performance Goals.
| Our non-GAAP net income(1) grew 5% to $9.2 billion in 2017, driven by lower expenses, including transformation and process improvement savings, and increased interest income from higher cash balances partially offset by investments to grow our business, including launching and maintaining new products, building out new therapeutic areas, advancing our biosimilars business and increasing our global presence. |
| Revenues were $22.8 billion in 2017, a slight decrease from 2016 despite increased competition for many of our largest products, several of which have lost patent protection. Actual performance was strong as 2017 reported product sales declined by less than $100 million (0.4%) compared to 2016 reported sales. |
ª We Progressed Our Pipeline.
Our medicines treat serious illnesses. In 2017, we have progressed important product candidates in all six of our therapeutic areas.
Executing Key Clinical Studies and Regulatory Filings.
Innovative Portfolio Developments.
| Bone Health. For Prolia®, our medicine for patients with osteoporosis, we filed a supplemental BLA(2) with the FDA(3) based on Phase 3 study data that demonstrated that Prolia treatment led to greater increases in bone mineral density in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis compared with risedronate. |
| Cardiovascular. For Repatha®, this therapy was approved by the FDA: |
- | as the first PCSK9 inhibitor to prevent heart attacks, strokes, and coronary revascularizations in adults with established cardiovascular disease; and |
- | to be used as an adjunct to diet, alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering therapies, such as statins, for the treatment of adults with primary hyperlipidemia to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. |
In 2018, the CHMP(4) of the EMA(5) adopted a positive opinion for the Marketing Authorization to include similar indications.
| Oncology/Hematology. |
- | For KYPROLIS®, our medicine for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, we reported three positive Phase 3 studies two of which demonstrated that different KYPROLIS regimens improved overall survival as compared to other therapeutic regimens. One set of overall survival data has been approved by the FDA for inclusion in the label and recommended for inclusion by the CHMP of the EMA and the other set is under consideration for inclusion by both regulators. |
- | For XGEVA®, our medicine for the prevention of fractures and other skeletal-related events, in 2018 the FDA approved a supplemental BLA for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma and the European Commission approved a variation to the Marketing Authorization to include a similar indication. |
- | For BLINCYTO®, our medicine for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or ALL, the FDA approved a supplemental BLA to include overall survival data from the Phase 3 TOWER study and expanded the indication to the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL in adults and children. In 2018, the FDA approved a supplemental BLA for the treatment of minimal residual disease in adults and children with B-cell precursor ALL. |
- | For Vectibix®, our medicine for patients with colorectal cancer, the FDA approved a supplemental BLA for Vectibix as a first-line therapy in combination with FOLFOX and as a monotherapy following disease progression after prior treatment with chemotherapies for patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. |
| Neuroscience. For Aimovig(6), our medicine being developed to prevent migraine, based on multiple positive studies demonstrating that Aimovig reduced the number of migraine days for patients with episodic and chronic migraine, we submitted a BLA to the FDA. |
| Inflammation. For tezepelumab(7), our medicine being developed for asthma, we reported that Phase 2b trial results demonstrated that tezepelumab significantly reduced asthma exacerbations in patients with uncontrolled asthma and initiated a Phase 3 study in early 2018. |
| Nephrology. For Parsabiv, we received FDA approval for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in adult patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. We launched Parsabiv in the U.S. in January 2018 and continue to launch in new markets throughout the world. |
(1) | Non-GAAP net income is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
(2) | Biologics License Application. |
(3) | U.S. Food and Drug Administration. |
(4) | Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. |
(5) | European Medicines Agency. |
(6) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Novartis AG. |
(7) | Jointly developed in collaboration with AstraZeneca plc. |
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 29
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
Biosimilars Portfolio Developments.
| The FDA approved MVASI(1) (biosimilar bevacizumab (Avastin®)) for the treatment of five types of cancer, the first ever biosimilar to fight cancer approved by the FDA, and the European Commission granted Marketing Authorization in January 2018. |
| The European Commission granted Marketing Authorization for AMGEVITA (biosimilar adalimumab (HUMIRA®)) in all available indications. We expect to begin launching AMGEVITA in Europe in 2018. |
| We submitted a BLA to the FDA and, in 2018, the CHMP of the EMA adopted a positive opinion for the Marketing Authorization for ABP 980(1) (biosimilar trastuzumab (Herceptin®)). |
ª We Advanced Our Early Pipeline.
| Generated 11 product teams (formed when a molecule has the potential to be safe and effective in humans), a record number for our Company. |
| Initiated 4 first-in-human studies. |
| Advanced AMG 301(2), our medicine being investigated for migraine prevention, into Phase 2. |
ª | We Delivered on Our Annual Priorities to Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives. |
| Prolia worldwide sales increased in 2017 by 20% year-over-year. Prolia is the leading osteoporosis therapy today. There are 3.5 million patients worldwide taking Prolia, and the demand for it continues to grow. |
| We increased Repatha U.S. net sales and average annual total prescriptions share, as well as E.U. average annual market share. Our focus remains on enabling access to Repatha for appropriate patients as hurdle rates for access and reimbursement for patients remain high. |
| We increased KYPROLIS U.S. and ex-U.S. net sales. Our clinical development program has delivered overall survival results in support of KYPROLIS as a backbone therapy for multiple myeloma. |
ª We Realized Our Functional Transformational Objectives.
| We realized approximately $400 million in savings as a result of initiatives at the Company level as well as activities within each function designed to transform approaches and improve processes with specific savings targets established for each area. |
| Together with our progress this year, since 2014, we have realized approximately $1.5 billion of transformation and process improvement savings. These savings were reinvested in product launches, clinical programs and external business development. Consequently, net savings in the same period have not been significant. |
Further Progress on Our Strategic Priorities
| Capitalizing on our expansion activities, we secured 80 product country launches. |
| While investing $3.6 billion in research and development, we also returned a total of $6.5 billion of capital to our stockholders through dividends and stock repurchases. |
| We have built leading patient- and provider-friendly device capabilities to enhance patient experience and to differentiate our product, including the Enbrel Mini single-dose prefilled cartridge with AutoTouch reusable auto-injector and the Neulasta® Onpro® kit. |
| We made investments in next-generation biomanufacturing that build on our existing industry leadership in biologic manufacturing. This next-generation biomanufacturing dramatically reduces the scale and costs of making biologics while maintaining a reliable, high-quality, compliant supply of medicines. In 2017, our new Singapore facility that utilizes the next-generation biomanufacturing approach was approved for certain commercial scale production by multiple regulatory agencies, including the FDA and the EMA. |
Long-Term Incentive Performance Award Program
Our long-term incentive, or LTI, equity award compensation is tied directly to our stock performance and aligns with the interests of our stockholders.
Long-Term Incentive Program
|
Equity
|
% of Target
| ||||
Performance Units
|
|
50% |
|
93.4% | ||
(2015-2017 performance period)
|
(1) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Allergan plc. |
(2) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Novartis AG. |
30 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
| Performance units earned for the 2015-2017 performance period (January 30, 2015 to January 30, 2018) were based on an earned payout percentage of 93.4% reflecting the Companys three-year total shareholder return, or TSR, performance at the 46.7th percentile relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Standard & Poors 500 Index, or S&P 500, since the beginning of the performance period. Our beginning stock price and ending stock price for purposes of the 2015-2017 performance period are each the average daily closing price of a share of our Common Stock for the beginning and last twenty trading days of the performance period ($154.49 and $186.61, respectively). Separately, but of note, Amgens 2015-2017 three year TSR (30.0%) outperformed that of the average TSR of our 2017 peer group (11.6%). |
| The 2015-2017 performance period of the performance award program is the last performance period that is earned based solely on our relative TSR performance. Commencing in 2016, and continuing in 2017 and 2018, our outstanding LTI equity award performance units are earned based on our financial performance as measured under annual financial measures, equally weighted with the resulting average earnout percentage increased or decreased by our relative TSR performance against the companies in the S&P 500 for the performance period that commences with the grant date and continues through December 31 of the last year of the relevant three-year performance period. The annual financial performance goals for each of the three years in the performance period are established at the commencement of the three-year performance period. |
| While retaining most of the elements of the 2016-2018 performance period goal design, the Compensation and Management Development Committee, or Compensation Committee, replaced non-GAAP operating expense with non-GAAP return on invested capital, or ROIC, for the third year (2019) of the 2017-2019 performance period. The Compensation Committees replacement of non-GAAP operating expense with non-GAAP ROIC as one of the three financial performance measures (in addition to non-GAAP earnings per share and non-GAAP operating margin) in the third year of the 2017-2019 performance period is designed to support our transformation strategic priority to deliver an efficient, disciplined business model beyond 2018. |
Positive 2017 Say on Pay Vote Outcome and Engagement With Our Stockholders
Board Recommends a Vote FOR Our Executive Compensation
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANYS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 31
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our compensation strategy, philosophy, policies, programs and practices, or compensation program, for our Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, and the positions they held in 2017 below.
Table of Contents
Name | Title | |
Robert A. Bradway |
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President | |
Anthony C. Hooper |
Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Operations | |
Sean E. Harper |
Executive Vice President, Research and Development | |
David W. Meline |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
Jonathan P. Graham |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
32 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
INNOVATIVE MEDICINES TRANSFORMING AMGEN FOR THE FUTURE GLOBAL GEOGRAPHIC REACH NEXT-GENERATION BIOMANUFACTURING IMPROVED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS CAPITAL ALLOCATION AND INVESTING FOR LONG-TERM GROWTH BRANDED BIOSIMlLARS Innovative Medicines Transforming Amgen for the Future Global Geographic Reach Next-Generation Biomanufacturing Improved Drug Delivery Systems Capital Allocation and Investing for long-Term Growth Branded Biosimilars
Six therapeutic areas form the core of our businesscardiovascular, oncology/hematology, neuroscience, inflammation, nephrology, and bone health. Our strategy in these therapeutic areas includes a series of integrated activities to strengthen our long-term competitive position in the industry. These activities include the following strategic priorities:
Our Strategic Priorities
Key 2017 activities that align our NEO pay with performance and support the execution of these strategic priorities are summarized in the following pages.
Strategic Priorities
|
Description
| |
|
Our focus on developing innovative, breakaway medicines to address important unmet needs guides how we allocate resources across internal and external program possibilities. This results in a productive balance of internal development and external programs and collaborations reflected in our current product portfolio and pipeline.
| |
| ||
|
We continue to improve our business and operating model through significant transformation and process improvement efforts. Among these programs, we have reduced the time it takes to bring new medicines to market, reengineered internal processes to make them more efficient, and explored new technologies with potential to further enhance the value we deliver to patients. Further, these transformation and process improvement efforts have resulted in significant costs savings and improved return on capital.
| |
| ||
|
We have been actively expanding our presence by opening new affiliates and locations around the world, pursuing appropriate acquisitions and acquiring global rights to market our products. Amgen medicines are now available to patients in approximately 100 countries worldwide. We are leveraging our global presence to deliver the potential of our products to patients globally.
| |
| ||
|
Our first next-generation biomanufacturing facility in Singapore has been constructed in less than half the time, at a quarter of the cost of a traditional facility while using 75% less space and having a much smaller impact on the environment. This facility was approved for certain commercial scale production by multiple regulatory agencies, including the FDA(1) and the EMA(2) in 2017. We are expanding our application of next-generation manufacturing in our organization. We announced in 2018 that we will invest in greater manufacturing capacity to support the volume growth that we foresee and plan to build a new drug substance manufacturing plant using our next-generation biomanufacturing capability in the U.S.
| |
| ||
|
Biologic medicines are, for the most part, injected subcutaneously or administered intravenously. Innovations that make the delivery of our medicines easier and less costly offer important opportunities for differentiation, are good for patients and also have positive economic benefits to the healthcare system overall. | |
| ||
|
We recognize that stockholders who support investment in developing innovative medicines require an appropriate return on the capital they commit to Amgen. In 2017, we returned $6.5 billion in capital to our stockholders ($3.4 billion in dividends and $3.1 billion in stock repurchases). | |
| ||
|
We believe our deep experience in biologics development and unparalleled capabilities in biotechnology manufacturing make entry into the emerging biosimilars market attractive and position us for leadership. | |
|
(1) | U.S. Food and Drug Administration. |
(2) | European Medicines Agency. |
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 33
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Aligning Pay With Performance and Execution of Our Strategic Priorities
(1) | Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or non-GAAP, net income for purposes of the 2017 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
(2) | Biologics License Application. |
(3) | Prescription Drug User Fee Act. |
(4) | Jointly developed in collaboration with UCB. |
INNOVATIVE MEDICINES
34 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. |
(2) | RandomizEd, OpeN Label, Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib Plus DExamethAsone Vs Bortezomib Plus DexamethasOne in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. |
(3) | CArfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and DexamethaSone versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for the treatment of PatIents with Relapsed Multiple MyEloma. |
(4) | RAndomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Study in Subjects with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Receiving Carfilzomib in Combination with Dexamethasone, Comparing Once-Weekly versus Twice-weekly Carfilzomib Dosing. |
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 35
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Branded Biosimilars INNOVATIVE MEDICINES Improved Drug Delivery Systems
(1) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Novartis AG. |
(2) | Jointly developed in collaboration with AstraZeneca plc. |
(3) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Allergan plc. |
36 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Global Geographic Reach Transforming Amgen for the Future Capital Allocation and Investing for long-Term Growth $1.12 $0.68 29% $1.44 31% $1.88 30% $2.44 30% $3.18 27% $4.00 15% $4.80 2011 2012 2013 2104 2015 2016 2017 Next-Generation Biomanufacturing
(1) | Reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 37
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Positive 2017 Say on Pay Vote Outcome and Engagement With Our Stockholders
Annual Meeting of Stockholders Executive compensation website available year-round that invites stockholders to provide feedback directly to the Compensation Committee www.amgen.com/executivecompensation Post-Proxy Filing for Annual Meeting Post-Annual Meeting Targeted outreach to investors requesting follow-up pre-proxy filing or related to key issues Discuss vote outcomes Consider existing governance and compensation practices in light of feedback Year-Round Stockholder Outreach and Engagement Pre-Proxy Filing for Annual Meeting Compensation-related feedback reviewed by Compensation Committee Governance-related feedback reviewed by Governance Committee Insights from investors provided to the full Board Appropriate committees and Board (as necessary) evaluate potential changes in light of stockholder feedback
38 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Our 2017 Compensation Program Highlights and Objectives
Total Target Direct Compensation Focuses on At Risk Compensation All preceding pie charts are calculated using (i) the Salary column from tile Summary Compensation Table in our Executive Compensation Tables (ii) the target annual caSh incentive caSh incentive award in the estimated Possible Payouts under non-Equity incentive Plan Awards- Target column in the table in footnote 2 to the Grants of Plan-based Awards table in our Executive Compensation Tables and (iii) the grant date fair value of annual grants of performance units RSUs and stock options In the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards column of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table in our Executive Compensation Tables. CEO 90o/o Pay at Risk 75% Performance based Other NEOs 82% Pay at Risk 69% Performance based Purpose LTI Equity Awards provide a direct link to the creation of shareholder value and execution of our strategy All NEOs interests with stockholders foster long-term focus and retention Annual Cash Incentives Measure NEOs performance pre-established company performance goals Align all staff members the same company performance goals as all such annual cash incentive awards are based on these on these goals Motivate NEOs to meet or exceed our annual Company performance goals to drive annual performance and position us for longer-term success via our strategy Base Salary Provides a degree or financial certainty that helps us retain talent Recognizes competitive market condition sandlot rewards individual performance through periodic increases LTI Equity Award alloction:80% performance based 50% performance units 30% Stock Options 20% Restricted stock units
40 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
LTI Equity Awards (At Risk)
| Performance Units (50%). The Compensation Committee establishes the performance award goal design at the commencement of each three-year period of the performance award program. There is no guarantee of any value realized from the grants as they are earned only if specific long-term performance goals are achieved. |
| Stock Options (30%). Aligned with stockholder interests as they only have value if the Companys stock price increases after grant. |
| Restricted Stock Units, or RSUs (20%). Designed to encourage retention and long-term value creation. |
| Stock options and RSUs vest in three approximately equal installments on the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The delay in the commencement of vesting further emphasizes the long-term performance focus of our LTI equity award program and enhances retention. |
Performance Units Earned for the 2015-2017 Performance Period
| Our payout for the most recent 2015-2017 performance period was at 93.4% of target because our TSR for this performance period (30%) resulted in our 46.7th percentile ranking relative to the TSRs of the companies in the S&P 500 since the beginning of the performance period (January 30, 2015). |
Annual Cash Incentive Awards (At Risk and Designed to Drive Execution of Our Strategic Priorities)
| Our Compensation Committee annually approves Company performance goals that are designed to focus our staff on delivering on our financial performance, operational objectives and specific strategic priorities to drive annual performance and position us to execute on our strategy in the near- and longer-term. Our Executive Incentive Plan, or EIP, establishes a maximum award possible for each participant and annual cash incentive awards are generally made to our NEOs under the EIP based on the Companys performance against the pre-established Company performance goals. |
| Our annual cash incentive awards are earned based on achieving financial performance, operational objectives that drive near- and long-term growth, stockholder value and support our strategy. In 2017, we established annual Company performance goals of revenues (30%), non-GAAP net income(1) (30%), and a number of operational measures supporting Progress Innovative Pipeline (25%) (composed of Execute Key Clinical Studies and Regulatory Filings (20%) and Advance Early Pipeline (5%)) and Deliver Annual Priorities (15%) (composed of Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives (10%) and Realize Functional Transformation Office Objectives (5%)). Based on our overall performance in 2017 compared to these pre-established Company performance goals, we paid annual cash incentive awards at 115% of target bonus opportunity. |
Base Salaries (the smallest component of compensation for our NEOs)
| Based on data provided to the Compensation Committee, including recommendations of Frederic W. Cook & Co., or Cook & Co., the Compensation Committees independent consultant, the Compensation Committee approved an overall merit increase of 2% for our NEOs, adjusted to align with the Market Median for each position. |
(1) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2017 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 41
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
How Compensation Decisions Are Made For Our Named Executive Officers
Roles and Responsibilities
Compensation Committee Composed solely of independent directors and reports to the Board
|
Evaluates the performance of our CEO within the context of the financial and operational performance of the Company.
Determines and approves compensation packages for our CEO, other NEOs, Executive Vice Presidents, Senior Vice Presidents and Section 16 officers (collectively, Senior Management).
Reviews and approves all compensation programs in which our NEOs participate.
Oversees the development and effective succession planning of our CEO and other members of Senior Management annually.
Exercises the sole authority to select, retain, replace and/or obtain advice from compensation consultants, legal counsel and other outside advisors and assesses the independence of each such advisor, taking into consideration the factors set forth in the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules and The NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards.
Oversees the Boards relationship with and response to stockholders on executive compensation matters and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
|
Consultant to the Compensation Committee Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., Independent consultant retained directly by the Compensation Committee
|
Regularly attends Compensation Committee meetings, including meeting in executive session with the Compensation Committee.
Provides advice and studies on the appropriateness and competitiveness of our compensation program relative to market practice for our NEO compensation.
Provides advice and studies on our equity programs.
Provides advice on the selection of our peer group.
Consults on executive compensation trends and developments.
Consults and makes recommendations, when requested, on various compensation matters and compensation program designs and practices to support our business strategy and objectives.
Coordinates and reviews the appropriateness of market data compiled by management.
Works with management to assess the potential risks arising from our compensation policies and practices.
|
CEO Assisted by the Senior Vice President, Human Resources and other Company staff members |
Conducts performance reviews of the other NEOs and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to compensation of Senior Management other than himself.
Provides recommendations on the development of and succession planning for the members of Senior Management other than himself.
|
Management reviews the Companys compensation programs CEO conducts performance reviews for the other NEOs and recommends Senior Management compensation to the Compensation Committee Compensation Committee evaluates the CEOs performance within the context of the financial and operational performance of the company Cook & Co. advises the Compensation Committee regarding the appropriateness of Amgens NEO compensation and compensation programs relative to market practice Compensation Committee reviews and approves all NEO compensation and compensation programs in which our NEOs participate and oversees succession planning for our senior management
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 43
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
44 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
How We Establish Our Peer Group
2017 Peer Group Companies Biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies with which we compete for executive talent. | ||||
Objective Criteria Considered
|
2017 Peer Group (Companies in blue also list Amgen as a peer)
| |||
GICS codes of biotechnology (352010) and pharmaceuticals (352020);
12-month average market capitalization between 0.25 and 4.0x that of Amgens average market capitalization for the same period(1);
Trailing four-quarter revenues between 0.25 and 4.0x that of Amgens revenues(1);
Non-U.S. peers limited to those commonly identified as a peer of peers;
Competitors for executive talent;
Companies of comparable scope and complexity;
Competitors for equity investor capital;
Companies that identify us as their direct peer; and
Companies with similar pay practices. |
AbbVie Inc.
Allergan plc
AstraZeneca plc
Biogen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Celgene Corporation
Eli Lilly and Company
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
GlaxoSmithKline plc
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co., Inc.
Novartis AG
Pfizer Inc.
Roche Holding AG
Sanofi S.A. |
(1) | For purposes of the 2017 peer group analyses: |
2016 Market Capitalization
|
2016 Revenues(a)
|
|||||
Amgen
|
$109 billion
|
|
$23 billion
|
| ||
Relative Peer Group Position
|
3rd Quartile (above median)
|
|
2nd Quartile
|
|
(a) | Revenues for GlaxoSmithKline plc, Roche Holding AG and Sanofi S.A. were converted into U.S. dollars using the average of daily exchange rates for 2016 as provided by Bloomberg L.P. |
Our market capitalization as of July 28, 2017 (the date on which the Compensation Committee considered our peer group) was as follows:
$B Market Capitalization 355 J&J 221 Novartis 217 Roche 198 Pfizer 175 Merck 127 Amgen 121 Sanofi 112 Abbvie 105 Celgene 99 Gilead 98 GSK 91 Eli Lilly 91 BMS 85 Allergan 74 Astra Zeneca 61 Biogen Position shown as of July 28, 2017 Currency in USD
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 45
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
The Market Median is determined for our CEO and our other NEOs based on the prior years compensation and is reviewed by the Compensation Committee to inform compensation decisions made in March of each year as follows:
Market Median
|
CEO (compiled by Cook & Co.)
|
Other NEOs
|
|||||
50th percentile of each compensation element paid to CEOs in our peer group in the previous year from proxy statements. |
Average of the 50th percentile of each compensation element of our peer group from the PHRA Survey (pharmaceutical peers) and proxy statements (biotechnology peers) in the previous year (with base pay data aged forward to the current year).
|
Elements of Compensation and Specific Compensation Decisions
Described below are our three primary elements of executive compensation in order of magnitude: LTI equity awards; annual cash incentive awards; and base salaries.
46 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
amgen historical outstanding potential dilution (% shares outstanding)
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 47
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Value of Long-Term Incentive Equity Awards
Granted to Named Executive Officers in 2017
2017 Annual Long-Term Incentive Equity Awards
Based on a review of Company and executive performance and market data, the Compensation Committee determined to grant the following LTI equity awards to our CEO and the other NEOs in March 2017, with an effective grant date of May 1, 2017, the third business day after the announcement of our first quarter 2017 earnings results. For more information regarding the determination of the Market Median, see How Compensation Decisions Are Made For Our Named Executive OfficersPeer Group Data Sources previously discussed.
Named Executive Officer |
Performance Units(1) ($) |
Stock Options ($) |
Restricted Stock Units ($) |
Total Equity Value Granted ($) |
2016 Market Median ($) |
Difference vs. Market Median Over/ (Under) (%) |
||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
3,600,000
|
|
|
2,400,000
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
11,500,000
|
|
|
4.3
|
| ||||||
Anthony C. Hooper
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
3,981,529
|
|
|
0.5
|
| ||||||
Sean E. Harper
|
|
1,850,000
|
|
|
1,110,000
|
|
|
740,000
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
3,701,010
|
|
|
0
|
| ||||||
David W. Meline
|
|
1,750,000
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
3,409,511
|
|
|
2.7
|
| ||||||
Jonathan P. Graham
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
2,614,622
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
(1) | The 2017-2019 performance period runs from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019. |
48 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2015-2017 Performance Period Program Design
Payout Calculation for the 2015-2017 Performance Period
2015-2017 Performance Period Performance Units Earned
Our actual performance results (the 46.7th percentile, or below the median) for the 2015-2017 performance period that ended January 30, 2018 resulted in the following number of shares of Common Stock being earned under our performance award program for this performance period. Each earned performance unit converted to one share of Common Stock upon the payout date of March 23, 2018.
Named Executive Officer |
|
Performance Units Value Granted (Target) ($) |
|
|
Number of Performance Units Granted (#) |
|
|
Number of Shares of our Common (#) |
| |||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
8,160,000
|
|
|
51,179
|
|
|
51,766
|
| |||
Anthony C. Hooper
|
|
2,800,000
|
|
|
17,561
|
|
|
17,762
|
| |||
Sean E. Harper
|
|
2,400,000
|
|
|
15,052
|
|
|
15,224
|
| |||
David W. Meline
|
|
2,400,000
|
|
|
15,052
|
|
|
15,224
|
| |||
Jonathan P. Graham
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(2)
|
(1) | Includes dividend equivalents earned on these amounts rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares (excluding fractional shares paid in cash). |
(2) | Mr. Graham commenced employment with the Company after the participants for the 2015-2017 performance period had been determined and, as such, he did not receive any performance units for the 2015-2017 performance period. |
200% 150% 100% 50% 0% Threshold Target Maximum Achieved 93.4% Linear interpolation throughout performance zone 0%ile 25th%ile Median 75th 100th %ile Performance Zone 0% 50% 100% 150% Target Award (Performance Units Granted) Relative Total Shareholder Return Multiplier (Amgen vs. S&P 500) Maximum (150%) payout for performance at and above the 75th percentile. Target (100%) payout for median, or 50th percentile, TSR performance. 50% payout for 25th percentile TSR performance. Final Payout 93.4% of Target Liner interpolation throughout performance zone
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 49
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | 2017 operating measures have been adjusted by $147 million in operating expense ($0.16 in EPS) for the impact of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 goal document. Otherwise, Non-GAAP EPS, Non-GAAP Operating Margin and Non-GAAP Operating Expense for purposes of 2016 and 2017 with respect to the 2016-2018 performance period are as reported and reconciled in Appendix B. Non-GAAP for purposes of each of the years of the 2016-2018 performance period was defined as earnings per share, operating margin and operating expense under GAAP, excluding certain items, net of tax, related to acquisitions, restructuring and certain other items, and the impact of tax law changes. |
50 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2016-2018 Performance Period Performance Award Goal Calculation
All operating goals (for each year) are established at the commencement of the three-year performance period.
(1) | 2017 operating measures have been adjusted by $147 million in operating expense ($0.16 in EPS) for the impact of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 goal document. Otherwise, Non-GAAP EPS, Non-GAAP Operating Margin and Non-GAAP Operating Expense for purposes of 2016 and 2017 with respect to the 2016-2018 performance period are as reported and reconciled in Appendix B. Non-GAAP for purposes of each of the years of the 2016-2018 performance period was defined as earnings per share, operating margin and operating expense under GAAP, excluding certain items, net of tax, related to acquisitions, restructuring and certain other items, and the impact of tax law changes. |
Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures (Scoring 50%-150%) Operating Expense 1/3rd Operating Margin 1/3rd EPS 1/3rd S&P 500 Relative TSR Modifier (Scoring +/- 50%) Maximum (50%) for 75th percentile and above Target (0%) for median, or 50th percentile Minimum (-50%) for 25th percentile or below Linear interpolation for performance along the payout curve Payout no greater than target (0%) if Amgens absolute TSR is less than 0 (Scoring 0%-200% of Target) Final Payout Multiplier) 2016-2018 Operating Measures Score (Operating Measure Percentages 50%-150% subject to linear interpolation along the payout curve) Operating Measures Percentages are Measured Annually and Equally Weighted for Each of the Three Years of the Performance Period Non-GAAP EPS(1) Growth (1/3rd) Non-GAAP Operating Margin(1) (1/3rd) Non-GAAP Operating Expense(1) (1/3rd) Average Operating Measure Percentages 2016 137% 129% 94% 120% 2017 129% 135% 116% 126% 2018 TBD TBD TBD TBD Three Year Average Operating Measure 2016 Targets 2016 Actual 2017 Targets 2017 Actual Non-GAAP EPS(1) ($) Minimum (50%) Less than or equal to $10.64 $11.65 (137%) Less than or equal to $10.89 $12.74 (129%) Target (100%) $10.90 $11.63 Intermediate (125%) $11.52 $12.66 Maximum (150%) More than or equal to $11.79 More than or equal to $13.19 Non-GAAP Operating Margin(1) (%) Minimum (50%) Less than or equal to 48% 52.3% (129%) Less than or equal to 48% 54.2% (135%) Target (100%) 50% 51% Intermediate (125%) 52% 53% Maximum (150%) More than or equal to 54% More than or equal to 56% Non-GAAP Operating Expense(1) ($B) Minimum (50%) More than or equal to $11.9 $11.45 (94%) More than or equal to $11.7 $11.0 (116%) Target (100%) $11.5 $11.2 Maximum (150%) Less than or equal to $11.1 Less than or equal to $10.7
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 51
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | 2017 operating measures have been adjusted by $147 Million in operating expense ($0.16 in EPS) for the impact of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2017-2019 goal document. Otherwise, Non-GAAP EPS, Non-GAAP Operating Margin and Non-GAAP Operating Expense for purposes of the 2017-2019 performance period are as reported and reconciled in Appendix B. Non-GAAP for purposes of each of the years of the 2017-2019 performance period was defined as earnings per share, operating margin, operating expense, and ROIC under GAAP, excluding certain items, net of tax, related to acquisitions, restructuring and certain other items, and the impact of tax law changes. |
52 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2017-2019 Performance Period Performance Award Goal Calculation
All operating goals (for each year) are established at the commencement of the three-year performance period.
(1) | 2017 operating measures have been adjusted by $147 Million in operating expense ($0.16 in EPS) for the impact of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2017-2019 goal document. Otherwise, Non-GAAP EPS, Non-GAAP Operating Margin and Non-GAAP Operating Expense for purposes of the 2017-2019 performance period are as reported and reconciled in Appendix B. Non-GAAP for purposes of each of the years of the 2017-2019 performance period was defined as earnings per share, operating margin, operating expense, and ROIC under GAAP, excluding certain items, net of tax, related to acquisitions, restructuring and certain other items, and the impact of tax law changes. |
Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures (Scoring 50%-150%) EPS 1/3rd Operating Margin 1/3rd Operating Expense Years 1 & 2 ROIC Years 3 1/3rd S&P 500 Relative TSR Modifier (Scoring +/- 50%) Maximum (50%) for 75th percentile and above Target (0%) for median, or 50th percentile Minimum (-50%) for 25th percentile or below Linear interpolation for performance along the payout curve Payout no greater that target (0%) if Amgens absolute TSR is less than 0 (scoring 0%-200% of Target) Final Payout Multiplier 2017-2019 Operating Measures Score (Operating Measure Percentages 50%-150% subject to linear interpolation along the payout curve) Operating Measures Percentages are Measured Annually and Equally Weighted for Each of the Three Years of the Performance Period Non-GAAP EPS(1) Growth Non-GAAP Operating Margin(1) Non-GAAP Operating Expense(1) Years 1 & 2 Non-GAAP ROIC(1) Year 3 Average Operating Measure Percentages 2017 134% 115% 107% N/A 118% 2018 TBD TBD TBD TBD 2019 TBD TBD N/A TBD TBD 1/3rd 1/3rd 1/3rd Three Year Average Operating Measure 2017 Targets 2017 Actual Non-GAAP EPS(1) ($) Minimum (50%) Less than or equal to $11.80 $12.74 (134%) Target (100%) $12.00 Intermediate (125%) $12.60 Maximum (150%) More than or equal to $13.00 Non-GAAP Operating Margin(1) (%) Minimum (50%) Less than or equal to 51% 54.2% (115%) Target (100%) 53% Intermediate (125%) 55% Maximum (150%) More than or equal to 57% Non-GAAP Operating Expense(1) ($B) Minimum (50%) More than or equal to $11.5 $11.0 (107%) Target (100%) $11.1 Maximum (150%) Less than or equal to $10.7
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 53
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
54 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | For 2017, Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the EIP has been adjusted by $116 million ($147 million in operating expense less the related income tax effects) for the impact of Hurricane Maria. Otherwise, Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the EIP is as reported and reconciled in Appendix B. Non-GAAP for purposes of net income was defined as net income under GAAP, excluding certain items, net of tax, related to acquisitions, restructuring and certain other items, and the impact of tax law changes. |
(2) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2017 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
ï 2018 Proxy Statement 55
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2017 Company Performance Goals and Results
The table below illustrates the weighting of each goal, the goals established and our actual performance for 2017. No amounts can be earned for below threshold performance for our financial metrics. For a more detailed description of our performance under each of the non-financial measures, please see the Executive Summary section above.
Deliver Results (60% weighting)
|
|
Weighted Score Achieved 68.2%
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Financial Goals (60%) ($ In Millions)
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Weighting
|
|
|
Achieved
|
| |||||
Revenues |
|
$21,085 |
|
|
$22,525 |
|
|
$24,325 |
|
|
30% |
|
|
$22,849 110.6% |
| |||||
Non-GAAP Net Income(1) |
$8,000 | $8,890 | $9,955 | 30% | |
$9,246 116.8% |
|
Progress Innovative Pipeline (25% weighting)
|
Weighted Score Achieved 34.7%
|
|||||||||
Goals
|
Results
|
Weighting
|
Achieved
|
|||||||
Execute Key Clinical Studies and |
Executed key clinical studies for KYPROLIS, BLINCYTO, EVENITY, IMLYGIC®, omecamtiv mecarbil, AMG 301, and ABP 980 (biosimilar trastuzumab (Herceptin®)). |
|
20% |
|
|
123.0% |
| |||
Completed regulatory filings for Repatha, XGEVA, BLINCYTO, EVENITY, Aimovig, Prolia, Parsabiv, ABP 980 and AMGEVITA (biosimilar adalimumab (HUMIRA®)). |
||||||||||
Advance Early Pipeline |
Generated a total of 11 product teams (formed when a molecule has been judged to have the potential to be safe and effective in humans), a record number for our Company, initiated four first-in-human studies, and advanced AMG 301 through the early-to-late stage portal.
|
5% | 201.7% | |||||||
Deliver Annual Priorities (15% weighting)
|
Weighted Score Achieved 12.1%
|
|||||||||
Goals
|
Results
|
Weighting
|
Achieved
|
|||||||
Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives |
Proliaincreased worldwide net sales. |
|
10% |
|
|
76.0% |
| |||
Repathaincreased U.S. net sales, U.S. average annual total prescriptions (TRx) share, as well as E.U. average annual market share. While we increased net sales, we did not achieve our overall sales target. |
||||||||||
KYPROLISincreased U.S. and ex-U.S. net sales. While we increased net sales, we did not achieve our overall sales target. |
||||||||||
We did not meet our launch timelines for Parsabiv and EVENITY. |
||||||||||
Realize Functional Transformation Office Objectives |
We introduced a program to drive additional savings across the Company. For this program, we realized approximately $400 million in savings as a result of initiatives at both the Company level as well as activities within each function designed to transform approaches with specific savings targets established for each area.
|
5% | 90.4% |
2017 Company Performance Goals Composite Score
|
|
Achieved 115.0%
|
|
(1) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2017 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
56 ï 2018 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2017 Annual Cash Incentive Awards
As shown in the table above, our performance against the 2017 Company performance goals yielded a composite score of 115% and the Compensation Committee awarded actual annual cash incentive awards under the EIP to our NEOs based on this composite score. No further discretion was employed.
Named Executive Officer |
Target Opportunity |
Target 2017 Award($) | Actual 2017 Award($)(1) | |||||||||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
150
|
|
|
2,333,077
|
|
|
2,683,000
|
| |||
Anthony C. Hooper
|
|
100
|
|
|
1,049,769
|
|
|
1,207,000
|
| |||
Sean E. Harper
|
|
100
|
|
|
970,308
|
|
|
1,116,000
|
| |||
David W. Meline
|
|
100
|
|
|
970,308
|
|
|
1,116,000
|
| |||
Jonathan P. Graham
|
|
80
|
|
|
745,785
|
|
|
858,000
|
|
(1) | Calculated in accordance with the 2017 Company performance goals composite score based on actual 2017 earnings. |