UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-21948
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Dana A. DeVivo
Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc.
280 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10017
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (212) 832-3232
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: December 31, 2018
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
To Our Shareholders:
We would like to share with you our report for the year ended December 31, 2018. The total returns for Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund, Inc. (the Fund) and its comparative benchmarks were:
Six Months Ended December 31, 2018 |
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|||||||
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund at Net Asset Valuea |
9.18 | % | 9.24 | % | ||||
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund at Market Valuea |
9.98 | % | 9.46 | % | ||||
Morningstar US All Taxable Ex-Foreign Equity Indexb |
9.67 | % | 9.48 | % | ||||
S&P 500 Indexb |
6.85 | % | 4.38 | % |
The performance data quoted represent past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The investment return and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate and shares, if sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Current total returns of the Fund can be obtained by visiting our website at cohenandsteers.com. The Funds returns assume the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. Net asset value (NAV) returns reflect fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, without which the returns would be lower. Index performance does not reflect the deduction of any fees, taxes or expenses. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. Performance figures for periods shorter than one year are not annualized.
The Fund makes regular monthly distributions at a level rate (the Policy). Distributions paid by the Fund are subject to recharacterization for tax purposes and are taxable up to the amount of the Funds investment company taxable income and net realized gains. As a result of the Policy, the Fund may pay distributions in excess of the Funds investment company taxable income and net realized gains. This excess would be a return of capital distributed from the Funds assets. Distributions of capital decrease the Funds total assets and, therefore, could have the effect of increasing the Funds expense ratio. In addition, in order to make these distributions, the Fund may have to sell portfolio securities at a less than opportune time.
Market Review
Closed-end funds struggled in 2018, in what was a tumultuous year for investments in general. Following a period of steady gains after a sharp correction in February, equity and credit markets again
a | As a closed-end investment company, the price of the Funds exchange-traded shares will be set by market forces and can deviate from the NAV per share of the Fund. |
b | The Morningstar US All Taxable Ex-Foreign Equity Index measures the market-capitalization-weighted total return of taxable equity and fixed income closed-end funds; it excludes international, regional, and country closed-end funds. Index returns update frequently and are subject to change. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 large-capitalization stocks that is frequently used as a general measure of U.S. stock market performance. |
1
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
encountered turbulence in the fourth quarter amid tightening financial conditions, rising global trade tensions and slowing economic growth. The broad global equity market suffered its largest annual decline since 2008.
Although economic growth remained above trend globally, momentum slowed across most regions. Europe and China in particular showed signs of deceleration. Inflation remained subdued, but indications that price pressures were building prompted the U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) to continue to normalize interest rates. The Fed also began to unwind its balance sheet, while the European Central Bank ended its bond buying program. Additionally, the strengthening U.S. dollar indirectly led to tighter credit conditions globally during the yearespecially in emerging markets.
In this environment, the equity and fixed income closed-end fund categories both declined, although fixed income held better than equity funds as a group. The period saw a general widening in closed-end funds discounts to their NAVs. Equity closed-end funds average discount went from 3.4% to 6.8% at the end of the year, somewhat wider than the historical average. The average discounts on taxable fixed income and municipal funds also expanded, to 7.9% and 11.5%, compared with long-term averages of 3.1% and 3.8%, respectively.
Fund Performance
The Fund had a negative total return in the period, although it slightly outperformed its benchmark based on NAV (the Fund performed in line with its benchmark based on market price).
Security selection and an overweight allocation in multi-sector funds contributed to relative performance. These funds, which have the flexibility to maneuver around a wide range of asset classes, outperformed with a relatively modest overall decline. Security selection in U.S. general equity funds and utilities funds also aided relative performance, as did an out-of-index allocation to tax-exempt municipal funds, which fell less than the index.
The Funds overweight in master limited partnership (MLP) funds detracted from relative performance, as the sector was among the poorest performers in the period. Although MLPs and other midstream energy companies experienced a banner year in terms of improving industry fundamentals and operating performance, those positives were overshadowed by regulatory issues, the broad market sell-off and a sharp decline in the price of crude oil. An overweight in financial funds also hampered performance; the sector underperformed on concerns about the economy, credit and a flattening yield curve. The Funds out-of-index allocation to emerging market equity funds further detracted from relative performance, as they were pressured by economic weakness and currency concerns.
Sincerely,
DOUGLAS R. BOND
Portfolio Manager
2
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
The views and opinions in the preceding commentary are subject to change without notice and are as of the date of the report. There is no guarantee that any market forecast set forth in the commentary will be realized. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time, should not be relied upon as investment advice and is not intended to predict or depict performance of any investment.
Visit Cohen & Steers online at cohenandsteers.com
For more information about the Cohen & Steers family of mutual funds, visit cohenandsteers.com. Here you will find fund net asset values, fund fact sheets and portfolio highlights, as well as educational resources and timely market updates.
Our website also provides comprehensive information about Cohen & Steers, including our most recent press releases, profiles of our senior investment professionals and their investment approach to each asset class. The Cohen & Steers family of mutual funds invests in major real asset categories including real estate securities, listed infrastructure, commodities and natural resource equities, as well as preferred securities and other income solutions.
3
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
December 31, 2018
Top Ten Holdings
(Unaudited)
Closed-End Fund |
Value | % of Net Assets |
||||||
Reaves Utility Income Fund |
$ | 12,706,638 | 4.0 | |||||
PIMCO Dynamic Credit Income Fund |
10,486,626 | 3.3 | ||||||
PIMCO High Income Fund |
10,317,953 | 3.2 | ||||||
First Trust Energy Income and Growth Fund |
10,064,209 | 3.2 | ||||||
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust |
9,425,483 | 3.0 | ||||||
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund |
9,235,412 | 2.9 | ||||||
PIMCO Income Opportunity Fund |
8,184,949 | 2.6 | ||||||
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund |
7,643,285 | 2.4 | ||||||
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund |
7,611,392 | 2.4 | ||||||
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II |
7,426,052 | 2.3 |
Sector Breakdown
(Based on Net Assets)
(Unaudited)
4
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2018
Shares | Value | |||||||||||
CLOSED-END FUNDS |
86.0% | |||||||||||
COMMODITIES |
1.9% | |||||||||||
BlackRock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust |
|
114,207 | $ | 806,301 | ||||||||
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trusta |
|
330,888 | 4,149,335 | |||||||||
Sprott Physical Platinum & Palladium Trusta |
|
111,215 | 1,096,180 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
6,051,816 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
COVERED CALL |
4.0% | |||||||||||
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. |
|
202,051 | 3,396,478 | |||||||||
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund |
|
99,752 | 1,341,664 | |||||||||
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund |
|
66,399 | 895,059 | |||||||||
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund |
|
179,571 | 1,831,624 | |||||||||
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund |
|
240,556 | 2,292,499 | |||||||||
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund |
|
415,175 | 3,097,205 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
12,854,529 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
EMERGING MARKETS DEBT |
0.1% | |||||||||||
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund |
|
31,086 | 299,047 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY |
4.5% | |||||||||||
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Investment Trust PLC |
|
253,663 | 2,765,794 | |||||||||
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund |
|
394,167 | 5,203,005 | |||||||||
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust PLC |
|
749,990 | 6,478,197 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
14,446,996 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
ENERGY/ RESOURCES |
1.3% | |||||||||||
Adams Natural Resources Fund, Inc. |
|
181,845 | 2,649,482 | |||||||||
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust |
|
132,142 | 1,380,884 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
4,030,366 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
EQUITY TAXADVANTAGED |
8.7% | |||||||||||
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund |
|
402,490 | 7,643,285 | |||||||||
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund |
|
246,564 | 3,338,477 | |||||||||
Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust |
|
361,944 | 6,623,575 | |||||||||
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund |
|
372,742 | 7,611,392 | |||||||||
Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Dividend Growth Fund |
|
117,331 | 1,572,235 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
5
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2018
Shares | Value | |||||||||||
Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund |
|
80,778 | $ | 819,897 | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
27,608,861 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
FINANCIAL |
1.5% | |||||||||||
John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund |
|
169,767 | 4,741,592 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
GLOBAL EQUITY |
1.5% | |||||||||||
Altaba, Inc.a |
|
29,587 | 1,714,271 | |||||||||
Fidelity European Values PLC (United Kingdom) |
|
695,797 | 1,837,637 | |||||||||
Henderson EuroTrust PLC (United Kingdom) |
|
54,587 | 684,505 | |||||||||
Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund, Inc. |
|
49,152 | 407,962 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
4,644,375 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
GLOBAL HYBRID (GROWTH & INCOME) |
0.2% | |||||||||||
LMP Capital and Income Fund, Inc. |
|
45,580 | 486,794 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
HEALTH/BIOTECH |
4.9% | |||||||||||
Gabelli Healthcare and WellnessRx Trust |
|
338,290 | 3,129,182 | |||||||||
Tekla Healthcare Investors |
|
167,602 | 3,008,456 | |||||||||
Tekla Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
|
212,395 | 3,563,988 | |||||||||
Tekla Life Sciences Investors |
|
200,943 | 3,036,249 | |||||||||
Tekla World Healthcare Fund |
|
243,735 | 2,824,889 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
15,562,764 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
INVESTMENT GRADE |
0.7% | |||||||||||
PIMCO Corporate and Income Opportunity Fund |
|
152,985 | 2,346,790 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
LIMITED DURATION |
1.1% | |||||||||||
BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust |
|
133,876 | 1,789,922 | |||||||||
Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund |
|
144,142 | 1,718,173 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
3,508,095 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS |
11.1% | |||||||||||
Fiduciary/Claymore MLP Opportunity Fund |
|
148,812 | 1,322,938 | |||||||||
First Trust Energy Income and Growth Fund |
|
537,618 | 10,064,209 | |||||||||
First Trust MLP and Energy Income Fund |
|
248,221 | 2,432,566 | |||||||||
First Trust New Opportunities MLP & Energy Fund |
|
555,183 | 4,186,080 | |||||||||
Kayne Anderson Midstream/Energy Fund, Inc. |
|
183,998 | 1,775,581 | |||||||||
Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company |
|
450,513 | 6,199,059 | |||||||||
Neuberger Berman MLP Income Fund, Inc. |
|
518,279 | 3,467,286 | |||||||||
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp. |
|
90,806 | 1,807,039 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
6
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2018
Shares | Value | |||||||||||
Tortoise MLP Fund, Inc. |
|
346,339 | $ | 4,242,653 | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
35,497,411 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
MULTI-SECTOR |
14.3% | |||||||||||
PIMCO Dynamic Credit Income Fund |
|
498,177 | 10,486,626 | |||||||||
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund |
|
316,498 | 9,235,412 | |||||||||
PIMCO High Income Fund |
|
1,288,134 | 10,317,953 | |||||||||
PIMCO Income Opportunity Fund |
|
322,369 | 8,184,949 | |||||||||
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II |
|
779,229 | 7,426,052 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
45,650,992 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
MUNICIPAL |
12.7% | |||||||||||
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust, Inc. |
|
83,923 | 1,108,623 | |||||||||
BlackRock Municipal Bond Trust |
|
20,854 | 278,818 | |||||||||
BlackRock Municipal Income Investment Quality Trust |
|
29,605 | 387,826 | |||||||||
BlackRock Municipal Income Trust |
|
25,942 | 316,233 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. |
|
106,221 | 1,051,588 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. |
|
34,728 | 511,543 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniHoldings Investment Quality Fund |
|
112,299 | 1,430,689 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. |
|
80,569 | 965,217 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. |
|
41,070 | 471,073 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund, Inc. |
|
44,619 | 505,087 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniVest Fund, Inc. |
|
124,512 | 1,028,469 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. |
|
74,300 | 930,236 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. |
|
76,310 | 872,223 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. |
|
113,309 | 1,365,373 | |||||||||
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. |
|
97,129 | 1,260,734 | |||||||||
BlackRock Strategic Municipal Trust |
|
64,404 | 767,052 | |||||||||
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust |
|
126,809 | 1,434,210 | |||||||||
Invesco Municipal Trust |
|
111,382 | 1,240,795 | |||||||||
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund |
|
191,047 | 2,351,789 | |||||||||
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund |
|
86,334 | 1,100,758 | |||||||||
Nuveen Enhanced AMT-Free Municipal
Credit |
|
233,796 | 3,268,468 | |||||||||
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund |
|
105,588 | 1,358,918 | |||||||||
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund |
|
476,468 | 6,394,201 | |||||||||
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. |
|
383,745 | 3,557,316 | |||||||||
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund |
|
212,441 | 2,664,010 | |||||||||
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund |
|
102,415 | 1,285,308 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
7
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2018
Shares | Value | |||||||||||
Pioneer Municipal High Income Trust |
|
44,244 | $ | 484,914 | ||||||||
Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust |
|
221,133 | 1,486,014 | |||||||||
Western Asset Municipal Partners Fund, Inc. |
|
40,063 | 556,876 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
40,434,361 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
PREFERRED |
4.6% | |||||||||||
Flaherty & Crumrine Dynamic Preferred and Income Fund, Inc. |
|
91,655 | 1,867,012 | |||||||||
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund, Inc. |
|
103,652 | 1,197,181 | |||||||||
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Securities Income Fund, Inc. |
|
142,164 | 2,378,404 | |||||||||
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III |
|
162,503 | 2,574,048 | |||||||||
Nuveen Preferred & Income Term Fund |
|
101,505 | 2,052,431 | |||||||||
Nuveen Preferred Income Opportunities Fund |
|
562,089 | 4,687,822 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
14,756,898 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
REAL ESTATE |
4.0% | |||||||||||
CBRE Clarion Global Real Estate Income Fund |
|
352,054 | 2,168,653 | |||||||||
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund, Inc. |
|
1,056,550 | 4,384,682 | |||||||||
Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund |
|
149,610 | 2,039,184 | |||||||||
Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund |
|
492,273 | 4,164,630 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
12,757,149 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
U.S. GENERAL EQUITY |
3.3% | |||||||||||
Gabelli Equity Trust, Inc. |
|
1,044,329 | 5,326,078 | |||||||||
Royce Value Trust, Inc. |
|
162,924 | 1,922,503 | |||||||||
Source Capital, Inc. |
|
73,698 | 2,398,870 | |||||||||
Tri-Continental Corp. |
|
32,837 | 772,326 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10,419,777 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
U.S. HYBRID (GROWTH & INCOME) |
1.6% | |||||||||||
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund |
|
277,001 | 5,060,808 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
UTILITY |
4.0% | |||||||||||
Reaves Utility Income Fund |
|
431,758 | 12,706,638 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
TOTAL
CLOSED-END FUNDS |
|
273,866,059 | ||||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
8
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2018
Shares | Value | |||||||||||
EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS |
11.0% | |||||||||||
EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY |
0.9% | |||||||||||
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF |
|
73,510 | $ | 2,871,301 | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
FINANCIAL |
3.0% | |||||||||||
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund |
|
286,190 | 6,817,046 | |||||||||
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF |
|
81,224 | 1,376,747 | |||||||||
SPDR S&P Bank ETF |
|
36,265 | 1,354,498 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
9,548,291 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
HEALTH/BIOTECH |
0.8% | |||||||||||
iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF |
|
27,994 | 2,699,461 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
U.S. GENERAL EQUITY |
6.3% | |||||||||||
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust |
|
37,714 | 9,425,483 | |||||||||
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF |
|
53,647 | 5,311,589 | |||||||||
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF Trust |
|
23,254 | 5,344,002 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
20,081,074 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
TOTAL EXCHANGE-TRADED
FUNDS |
|
35,200,127 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS |
2.8% | |||||||||||
MONEY MARKET FUNDS |
||||||||||||
State Street Institutional Treasury Money Market Fund, |
|
8,828,704 | 8,828,704 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
TOTAL SHORT-TERM
INVESTMENTS |
|
8,828,704 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN
SECURITIES |
99.8% | 317,894,890 | ||||||||||
OTHER ASSETS IN EXCESS OF LIABILITIES |
0.2 | 595,548 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET ASSETS (Equivalent to $11.71 per share based on 27,209,148 shares of common stock outstanding) |
100.0% | $ | 318,490,438 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
9
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2018
Glossary of Portfolio Abbreviations
ETF |
Exchange-Traded Fund | |
MLP |
Master Limited Partnership | |
SPDR |
Standard & Poors Depositary Receipt |
Note: Percentages indicated are based on the net assets of the Fund.
a | Non-income producing security. |
b | Rate quoted represents the annualized seven-day yield. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
10
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
December 31, 2018
ASSETS: |
| |||
Investments in securities, at value (Identified cost$366,998,747) |
$ | 317,894,890 | ||
Cash |
240,344 | |||
Receivable for dividends |
780,785 | |||
Other assets |
1,637 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
318,917,656 | |||
|
|
|||
LIABILITIES: |
| |||
Payable for: |
||||
Investment management fees |
262,002 | |||
Dividends declared |
165,052 | |||
Directors fees |
164 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
427,218 | |||
|
|
|||
NET ASSETS |
$ | 318,490,438 | ||
|
|
|||
NET ASSETS consist of: |
| |||
Paid-in capital |
$ | 369,462,543 | ||
Total distributable earnings/(accumulated loss) |
(50,972,105 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
$ | 318,490,438 | |||
|
|
|||
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE: |
| |||
($318,490,438 ÷ 27,209,148 shares outstanding) |
$ | 11.71 | ||
|
|
|||
MARKET PRICE PER SHARE |
$ | 11.09 | ||
|
|
|||
MARKET PRICE PREMIUM (DISCOUNT) TO NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE |
(5.29 | )% | ||
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
11
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Investment Income: |
| |||
Dividend income |
$ | 15,398,444 | ||
|
|
|||
Expenses: |
| |||
Investment management fees |
3,455,119 | |||
Directors fees and expenses |
21,143 | |||
Miscellaneous |
3,403 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Expenses |
3,479,665 | |||
Reduction of Expenses (See Note 2) |
(24,546 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Expenses |
3,455,119 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Investment Income (Loss) |
11,943,325 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss): |
| |||
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
| |||
Investments in securities |
12,812,728 | |||
Foreign currency transactions |
(7,246 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net realized gain (loss) |
12,805,482 | |||
|
|
|||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
| |||
Investments in securities |
(59,231,710 | ) | ||
Foreign currency translations |
(112 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
(59,231,822 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
(46,426,340 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
$ | (34,483,015 | ) | |
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
12
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|||||||
Change in Net Assets: |
| |||||||
From Operations: |
| |||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$ | 11,943,325 | $ | 11,926,701 | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) |
12,805,482 | 70,105,503 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
(59,231,822 | ) | (26,539,275 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
(34,483,015 | ) | 55,492,929 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Distributions to shareholdersa |
(23,826,142 | ) | (28,406,351 | ) | ||||
Tax return of capital to shareholders |
(4,580,209 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total distributions |
(28,406,351 | ) | (28,406,351 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets |
(62,889,366 | ) | 27,086,578 | |||||
Net Assets: |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
381,379,804 | 354,293,226 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
$ | 318,490,438 | $ | 381,379,804 | ||||
|
|
|
|
a | Distributions to shareholders from net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2017 have been reclassified to distributions to shareholders to reflect required amendments to Regulation S-X and to conform to the current year presentation. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
13
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following table includes selected data for a share outstanding throughout each year and other performance information derived from the financial statements. It should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto.
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance: |
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of year |
$14.02 | $13.02 | $12.34 | $14.42 | $14.06 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss)a,b |
0.44 | 0.44 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.69 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(1.71 | ) | 1.60 | 1.15 | (1.64 | ) | 0.71 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
(1.27 | ) | 2.04 | 1.72 | (1.04 | ) | 1.40 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Less dividends and distributions to shareholders from: |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
(0.87 | ) | (1.04 | ) | (0.89 | ) | (0.81 | ) | (1.04 | ) | ||||||||||
Tax return of capital |
(0.17 | ) | | (0.15 | ) | (0.23 | ) | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions to shareholders |
(1.04 | ) | (1.04 | ) | (1.04 | ) | (1.04 | ) | (1.04 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value |
(2.31 | ) | 1.00 | 0.68 | (2.08 | ) | 0.36 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net asset value, end of year |
$11.71 | $14.02 | $13.02 | $12.34 | $14.42 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Market value, end of year |
$11.09 | $13.31 | $11.70 | $10.96 | $13.16 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total net asset value returnc |
9.24 | % | 16.67 | % | 15.31 | % | 6.57 | % | 10.92 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total market value returnc |
9.46 | % | 23.26 | % | 16.67 | % | 9.04 | % | 13.19 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of year (in millions) |
$318.5 | $381.4 | $354.3 | $335.8 | $392.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Ratios to average daily net assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses (before expense reduction)d |
0.96 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.96 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Expenses (net of expense reduction)d |
0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.95 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
3.28 | % | 3.19 | % | 4.45 | % | 4.36 | % | 4.71 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
3.29 | % | 3.20 | % | 4.46 | % | 4.37 | % | 4.72 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate |
37 | % | 80 | % | 36 | % | 19 | % | 33 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a | Calculation based on average shares outstanding. |
b | Net investment income (loss) is affected by the timing of distributions of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests. |
c | Total net asset value return measures the change in net asset value per share over the period indicated. Total market value return is computed based upon the Funds market price per share and excludes the effects of brokerage commissions. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of these calculations, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. |
d | Does not include expenses incurred by the underlying funds in which the Fund invests. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
14
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund, Inc. (the Fund) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on September 14, 2006 and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Funds investment objective is to achieve total return.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The Fund is an investment company and, accordingly, follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 946Investment Companies. The accounting policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Portfolio Valuation: Investments in securities that are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) are valued, except as indicated below, at the last sale price reflected at the close of the NYSE on the business day as of which such value is being determined. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the mean of the closing bid and ask prices on such day or, if no ask price is available, at the bid price.
Securities not listed on the NYSE but listed on other domestic or foreign securities exchanges (including NASDAQ) are valued in a similar manner. Securities traded on more than one securities exchange are valued at the last sale price reflected at the close of the exchange representing the principal market for such securities on the business day as of which such value is being determined. If after the close of a foreign market, but prior to the close of business on the day the securities are being valued, market conditions change significantly, certain non-U.S. equity holdings may be fair valued pursuant to procedures established by the Board of Directors.
Readily marketable securities traded in the over-the-counter (OTC) market, including listed securities whose primary market is believed by Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (the investment manager) to be OTC, are valued on the basis of prices provided by a third-party pricing service or third-party broker-dealers when such prices are believed by the investment manager, pursuant to delegation by the Board of Directors, to reflect the fair value of such securities.
Short-term debt securities with a maturity date of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Investments in open-end mutual funds are valued at net asset value (NAV).
The policies and procedures approved by the Funds Board of Directors delegate authority to make fair value determinations to the investment manager, subject to the oversight of the Board of Directors. The investment manager has established a valuation committee (Valuation Committee) to administer, implement and oversee the fair valuation process according to the policies and procedures
15
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
approved annually by the Board of Directors. Among other things, these procedures allow the Fund to utilize independent pricing services, quotations from securities and financial instrument dealers and other market sources to determine fair value.
Securities for which market prices are unavailable, or securities for which the investment manager determines that the bid and/or ask price or a counterparty valuation does not reflect market value, will be valued at fair value, as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee, pursuant to procedures approved by the Funds Board of Directors. Circumstances in which market prices may be unavailable include, but are not limited to, when trading in a security is suspended, the exchange on which the security is traded is subject to an unscheduled close or disruption or material events occur after the close of the exchange on which the security is principally traded. In these circumstances, the Fund determines fair value in a manner that fairly reflects the market value of the security on the valuation date based on consideration of any information or factors it deems appropriate. These may include, but are not limited to, recent transactions in comparable securities, information relating to the specific security and developments in the markets.
Foreign equity fair value pricing procedures utilized by the Fund may cause certain non-U.S. equity holdings to be fair valued on the basis of fair value factors provided by a pricing service to reflect any significant market movements between the time the Fund values such securities and the earlier closing of foreign markets.
The Funds use of fair value pricing may cause the NAV of Fund shares to differ from the NAV that would be calculated using market quotations. Fair value pricing involves subjective judgments and it is possible that the fair value determined for a security may be materially different than the value that could be realized upon the sale of that security.
Fair value is defined as the price that the Fund would expect to receive upon the sale of an investment or expect to pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction with an independent buyer in the principal market or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the investment or liability. The hierarchy of inputs that are used in determining the fair value of the Funds investments is summarized below.
| Level 1quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
| Level 2other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, credit risk, etc.) |
| Level 3significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments may or may not be an indication of the risk associated with those investments. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy.
16
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2018 in valuing the Funds investments carried at value:
Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Investments (Level 1) |
Other Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||||||
Closed-End Funds: |
||||||||||||||||
Global Equity |
$ | 4,644,375 | $ | 2,122,233 | $ | 2,522,142 | $ | | ||||||||
Emerging Markets Equity |
14,446,996 | 5,203,005 | 9,243,991 | | ||||||||||||
Other |
254,774,688 | 254,774,688 | | | ||||||||||||
Exchange-Traded Funds |
35,200,127 | 35,200,127 | | | ||||||||||||
Short-Term Investments |
8,828,704 | | 8,828,704 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Investments in Securitiesa |
$ | 317,894,890 | $ | 297,300,053 | $ | 20,594,837 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a | Portfolio holdings are disclosed individually on the Schedule of Investments. |
Security Transactions and Investment Income: Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income, which includes the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date, except for certain dividends on foreign securities, which are recorded as soon as the Fund is informed after the ex-dividend date. Distributions from closed-end funds (CEFs) and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are recorded as ordinary income, net realized capital gain or return of capital based on information reported by the CEFs and ETFs and managements estimates of such amounts based on historical information. These estimates are adjusted when the actual source of distributions is disclosed by the CEFs and ETFs and may differ from the estimated amounts.
Foreign Currency Translation: The books and records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon prevailing exchange rates on the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon prevailing exchange rates on the respective dates of such transactions. The Fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
Net realized foreign currency transaction gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, (excluding gains and losses on forward foreign currency exchange contracts, which are presented separately, if any) currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Funds books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses arise from changes in the
17
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
values of assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, on the date of valuation, resulting from changes in exchange rates. Pursuant to U.S. federal income tax regulations, certain foreign currency gains/losses included in realized and unrealized gains/losses are included in or are a reduction of ordinary income for federal income tax purposes.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders: The Fund makes regular distributions pursuant to the Policy. Dividends from net investment income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. Dividends from net investment income, if any, are declared quarterly and paid monthly. Net realized capital gains, unless offset by any available capital loss carryforward, are typically distributed to shareholders at least annually. Dividends and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date and are automatically reinvested in full and fractional shares of the Fund in accordance with the Funds Reinvestment Plan, unless the shareholder has elected to have them paid in cash.
Dividends from net investment income are subject to recharacterization for tax purposes. Based upon the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018, a portion of the dividends has been reclassified to distributions from tax return of capital.
Income Taxes: It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company (RIC), if such qualification is in the best interest of the shareholders, by complying with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to RICs, and by distributing substantially all of its taxable earnings to its shareholders. Also, in order to avoid the payment of any federal excise taxes, the Fund will distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net realized gains on a calendar year basis. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. Management has analyzed the Funds tax positions taken on federal and applicable state income tax returns as well as its tax positions in non-U.S. jurisdictions in which it trades for all open tax years and has concluded that as of December 31, 2018, no additional provisions for income tax are required in the Funds financial statements. The Funds tax positions for the tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service, state departments of revenue and by foreign tax authorities.
Note 2. Investment Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Management Fees: Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. serves as the Funds investment manager pursuant to an investment management agreement (the investment management agreement). Under the terms of the investment management agreement, the investment manager provides the Fund with day-to-day investment decisions and generally manages the Funds investments in accordance with the stated policies of the Fund, subject to the supervision of the Board of Directors.
For the services provided to the Fund, the investment manager receives a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at the annual rate of 0.95% of the average daily net assets of the Fund.
The investment manager is also responsible, under the investment management agreement, for the performance of certain administrative functions for the Fund. Additionally, the investment manager pays certain expenses of the Fund, including, but not limited to, administrative and custody fees, transfer agent fees, professional fees, and reports to shareholders.
18
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The investment manager has contractually agreed to reimburse the Fund so that its total annual operating expenses, exclusive of brokerage fees and commissions, taxes and, upon approval of the Board of Directors, extraordinary expenses, do not exceed 0.95% of the Funds average daily net assets. This commitment will remain in place for the life of the Fund. For the year ended December 31, 2018, fees waived and/or expenses reimbursed totaled $24,546.
Directors and Officers Fees: Certain directors and officers of the Fund are also directors, officers, and/or employees of the investment manager. The Fund does not pay compensation to directors and officers affiliated with the investment manager.
Note 3. Purchases and Sales of Securities
Purchases and sales of securities, excluding short-term investments, for the year ended December 31, 2018, totaled $132,577,787 and $136,410,011, respectively.
Note 4. Income Tax Information
The tax character of dividends and distributions paid was as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Ordinary income |
$ | 22,254,483 | $ | 27,113,248 | ||||
Tax-exempt income |
1,571,659 | 1,293,103 | ||||||
Tax return of capital |
4,580,209 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total dividends and distributions |
$ | 28,406,351 | $ | 28,406,351 | ||||
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018, the tax-basis components of accumulated earnings, the federal tax cost and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value of investments held were as follows:
Cost of investments in securities for federal income tax purposes |
$ | 368,912,113 | ||
|
|
|||
Gross unrealized appreciation on investments |
$ | 2,673,164 | ||
Gross unrealized depreciation on investments |
(53,690,499 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
$ | (51,017,335 | ) | |
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Fund utilized net capital loss carryforwards of $11,678,476. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Fund had net capital loss carryforwards of $3,657,996 which expired unused.
As of December 31, 2018, the Fund had temporary book/tax differences primarily attributable to wash sales on portfolio securities and unrealized gains on passive foreign investment companies and permanent book/tax differences primarily attributable to fund distributions and the expiration of capital loss carryforwards. To reflect reclassifications arising from the permanent differences, paid-in capital was
19
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
charged $15,384,449 and total distributable earnings/(accumulated loss) was credited $15,384,449. Net assets were not affected by this reclassification.
Note 5. Capital Stock
The Fund is authorized to issue 100 million shares of common stock at a par value of $0.001 per share.
During the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Fund did not issue shares of common stock for the reinvestment of dividends.
The Board of Directors approved the continuation of the delegation of its authority to management to effect repurchases, pursuant to managements discretion and subject to market conditions and investment considerations, of up to 10% of the Funds common shares outstanding (Share Repurchase Program) from January 1, 2019, through the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
During the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Fund did not effect any repurchases.
Note 6. Other Risks
Common Stock Risk: While common stocks have historically generated higher average returns than fixed income securities over the long-term, common stock has also experienced significantly more volatility in those returns, although under certain market conditions, fixed-income investments may have comparable or greater price volatility. An adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value of common stock held by the Fund. Also, the price of common stock is sensitive to general movements in the stock market. A drop in the stock market may depress the price of common stock held by the Fund.
Risks of Investing in Other Investment Companies: Since the Fund concentrates its assets in closed-end management investment companies, risks of investing in the Fund include the risks associated with the purchased closed-end investment companies portfolio securities, and a shareholder in the Fund will bear not only his or her proportionate share of the Funds expenses, but also indirectly the expenses of the purchased closed-end investment companies (Portfolio Funds). Shareholders will therefore be subject to duplicative expenses to the extent the Fund invests in other investment companies. Risks associated with investments in closed-end funds generally include market risk, leverage risk, risk of market price discount from NAV, risk of anti-takeover provisions and non-diversification.
To the extent the Fund invests a portion of its assets in other investment companies, including open-end funds, exchange-traded funds and other types of pooled investment funds, those assets will be subject to the risks of the purchased investment funds portfolio securities, and a shareholder in the Fund will bear not only his or her proportionate share of the Funds expenses, but also indirectly the expenses of the purchased investment funds. In addition, restrictions under the 1940 Act may limit the Funds ability to invest in other investment companies to the extent desired.
Sector Concentration Risk: Some Portfolio Funds invest substantially, or even exclusively, in one sector or industry group and therefore carry risk of the particular sector or industry group. To the extent a Portfolio Fund focuses its investments in a specific sector, such as real estate, energy or utilities, the
20
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Portfolio Fund will be susceptible to adverse conditions and economic or regulatory occurrences affecting the sector or industry group, which tends to increase volatility and result in higher risk.
Covered Call Writing Risk: The Fund may invest in Portfolio Funds that engage in a strategy known as covered call option writing, which is designed to produce income from option premiums and offset a portion of a market decline in the underlying security. The writer (seller) of a covered call option forgoes, during the options life, the opportunity to profit from increases in the market value of the security covering the call option above the sum of the premium and the strike price of the call, but has retained the risk of loss should the price of the underlying security decline. The writer of an option has no control over the time when it may be required to fulfill its obligation as a writer of the option. Once an option writer has received an exercise notice, it cannot effect a closing purchase transaction in order to terminate its obligation under the option and must deliver the underlying security at the exercise price.
Municipal Bond Risk: The Fund may invest in Portfolio Funds that invest in municipal bonds. Municipal bonds are debt obligations issued by states or by political subdivisions or authorities of states. Municipal bonds are typically designated as general obligation bonds, which are general obligations of a governmental entity that are backed by the taxing power of such entity, or revenue bonds, which are payable from the income of a specific project or authority and are not supported by the issuers power to levy taxes. Municipal bonds are long-term fixed rate debt obligations that generally decline in value with increases in interest rates, when an issuers financial condition worsens or when the rating on a bond is decreased. Many municipal bonds may be called or redeemed prior to their stated maturity. Lower quality revenue bonds and other credit-sensitive municipal securities carry higher risks of default than general obligation bonds.
Master Limited Partnership Risk: The Fund may invest in Portfolio Funds that invest in master limited partnerships (MLPs). An investment in MLP units involves some risks that differ from an investment in the common stock of a corporation. Holders of MLP units have limited control on matters affecting the partnership. Investing in MLPs involves certain risks related to investing in the underlying assets of the MLPs and risks associated with pooled investment vehicles. MLPs holding credit-related investments are subject to interest rate risk and the risk of default on payment obligations by debt issuers. MLPs that concentrate in a particular industry or a particular geographic region are subject to risks associated with such industry or region. The benefit derived from the Funds investment in MLPs is largely dependent on the MLPs being treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. Weakening energy market fundamentals may increase counterparty risk and impact MLP profitability. Specifically, energy companies suffering financial distress may be able to abrogate contracts with MLPs, decreasing or eliminating sources of revenue.
Senior Loans Risk: The Fund may invest in Portfolio Funds that invest in senior loans. The risks associated with senior loans are similar to the risks of junk bonds, although senior loans are typically senior and secured, whereas junk bonds are often subordinated and unsecured. Investments in senior loans are typically below investment grade and are considered speculative because of the credit risk of their issuers. Such companies are more likely to default on their payments of interest and principal owed, and such defaults could reduce a Portfolio Funds NAV and income distributions. An economic downturn generally leads to a higher non-payment rate, and a senior loan may lose significant value before a default occurs. There is no assurance that the liquidation of the collateral would satisfy the
21
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
claims of the borrowers obligations in the event of the nonpayment of scheduled interest or principal, or that the collateral could be readily liquidated. Economic and other events (whether real or perceived) can reduce the demand for certain senior loans or senior loans generally, which may reduce market prices. Senior loans and other debt securities are also subject to the risk of price declines and to increases in prevailing interest rates, although floating-rate debt instruments such as senior loans in which certain Portfolio Funds may be expected to invest are substantially less exposed to this risk than fixed-rate debt instruments.
Preferred Securities Risk: The Fund may invest in Portfolio Funds that invest in preferred securities. Preferred securities are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that a security will decline in price, or the issuer of the security will fail to make dividend, interest or principal payments when due, because the issuer experiences a decline in its financial status. Preferred securities are also subject to interest rate risk and may decline in value because of changes in market interest rates. Portfolio Funds may be subject to a greater risk of rising interest rates than would normally be the case in an environment of low interest rates and the effect of potential government fiscal policy initiatives and resulting market reaction to those initiatives. In addition, an issuer may be permitted to defer or omit distributions. Preferred securities are also generally subordinated to bonds and other debt instruments in a companys capital structure. During periods of declining interest rates, an issuer may be able to exercise an option to redeem (call) its issue at par earlier than scheduled, and the Portfolio Fund may be forced to reinvest in lower yielding securities. Certain preferred securities may be substantially less liquid than many other securities, such as common stocks. Generally, preferred security holders have no voting rights with respect to the issuing company unless certain events occur. Certain preferred securities may give the issuers special redemption rights allowing the securities to be redeemed prior to a specified date if certain events occur, such as changes to tax or securities laws.
Leverage Risk: Portfolio Funds may employ the use of leverage. The use of leverage is a speculative technique and there are special risks and costs associated with leverage. The NAV of the Portfolio Funds shares may be reduced by the issuance and ongoing costs of leverage. So long as the Portfolio Fund is able to invest in securities that produce an investment yield that is greater than the total cost of leverage, the leverage strategy will produce higher current net investment income for the shareholders, including the Fund. On the other hand, to the extent that the total cost of leverage exceeds the incremental income gained from employing such leverage, shareholders, including the Fund, would realize lower net investment income. In addition to the impact on net income, the use of leverage will have an effect of magnifying capital appreciation or depreciation for shareholders. Specifically, in an up market, leverage will typically generate greater capital appreciation than if the Portfolio Fund were not employing leverage. Conversely, in down markets, the use of leverage will generally result in greater capital depreciation than if the Portfolio Fund had been unlevered. To the extent that the Portfolio Fund is required or elects to reduce its leverage, the Portfolio Fund may need to liquidate investments, including under adverse economic conditions which may result in capital losses potentially reducing returns to shareholders. The use of leverage also results in the investment management fees payable to the investment manager being higher than if the Fund did not use leverage and can increase operating costs, which may reduce total return. There can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful during any period in which it is employed.
22
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Regulatory Risk: The U.S. government has proposed and adopted multiple regulations that could have a long-lasting impact on the Fund and on the mutual fund industry in general. The SECs final rules and amendments that modernize reporting and disclosure, along with other potential upcoming regulations, could, among other things, restrict the Funds ability to engage in transactions and/or increase overall expenses of the Fund. In addition, the SEC, Congress, various exchanges and regulatory and self-regulatory authorities, both domestic and foreign, have undertaken reviews of the use of derivatives by registered investment companies, which could affect the nature and extent of derivatives used by the Fund. While the full extent of these regulations is still unclear, these regulations and actions may adversely affect both the Fund and the instruments in which the Fund invests as well as its ability to execute its investment strategy. Similarly, regulatory developments in other countries may have an unpredictable and adverse impact on the Fund.
Foreign (Non-U.S.) and Emerging Market Securities Risk: The Fund directly purchases securities of foreign issuers. Risks of investing in foreign securities, which can be expected to be greater for investments in emerging markets, include currency risks, future political and economic developments and possible imposition of foreign withholding taxes on income or proceeds payable on the securities. In addition, there may be less publicly available information about a foreign issuer than about a domestic issuer, and foreign issuers may not be subject to the same accounting, auditing and financial recordkeeping standards and requirements as domestic issuers. Moreover, securities of many foreign issuers and their markets may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. issuers.
Investing in securities of companies in emerging markets may entail special risks relating to potential economic, political or social instability and the risks of expropriation, nationalization, confiscation, trade sanctions or embargoes or the imposition of restrictions on foreign investment, the lack of hedging instruments, and repatriation of capital invested. The securities and real estate markets of some emerging market countries have in the past experienced substantial market disruptions and may do so in the future.
Note 7. Other
In the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on claims that may be made against the Fund in the future and, therefore, cannot be estimated; however, based on experience, the risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Note 8. New Accounting Guidance
In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Disclosure FrameworkChanges to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The amendments to ASU 2018-13 are intended to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements through modifications to disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early
23
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
adoption permitted. The Fund has adopted the amended disclosures permissible under the update. The adoption had no effect on the Funds net assets or results of operations.
In August 2018, the SEC adopted amendments to Regulation S-X which are intended to facilitate the disclosure of information to investors and simplify compliance without significantly altering the information provided to investors. The amendments include eliminating the requirement to: separately state book basis components of net assets on the Statement of Assets & Liabilities; separately state the sources of distributions paid (except tax return of capital distributions must still be separately disclosed) on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets; and state the book basis amount of undistributed net investment income on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets. The Fund adopted the amendments within the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, which had no effect on the Funds net assets or results of operations.
Note 9. Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated events and transactions occurring after December 31, 2018 through the date that the financial statements were issued, and has determined that no additional disclosure in the financial statements is required.
24
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund, Inc. (the Fund) as of December 31, 2018, the related statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2018 (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of December 31, 2018, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018 and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Funds management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Funds financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2018 by correspondence with the custodian and transfer agent. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
February 26, 2019
We have served as the auditor of one or more investment companies in the Cohen & Steers family of mutual funds since 1991.
25
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS
(Periods ended December 31, 2018) (Unaudited)
Based on Net Asset Value | Based on Market Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year |
Five Years | Ten Years | Since Inception (11/24/06) |
One Year | Five Years | Ten Years | Since Inception (11/24/06) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9.24 | % | 4.82 | % | 11.15 | % | 4.55 | % | 9.46 | % | 6.04 | % | 10.76 | % | 3.80 | % |
The performance data quoted represent past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The investment return will vary and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate and shares, if sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Current total returns of the Fund can be obtained by visiting our website at cohenandsteers.com. Fund performance figures reflect fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, without which the performance would have been lower. The Funds returns assume the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan.
TAX INFORMATION2018 (Unaudited)
For the calendar year ended December 31, 2018, for individual taxpayers, the Fund designates $6,642,056 as qualified dividend income eligible for reduced tax rates and $1,571,659 as tax-exempt income distributions. In addition, for corporate taxpayers, 16.51% of the ordinary dividends paid qualified for the dividends received deduction (DRD).
REINVESTMENT PLAN
The Fund has a dividend reinvestment plan commonly referred to as an opt-out plan (the Plan). Each common shareholder who participates in the Plan will have all distributions of dividends and capital gains (Dividends) automatically reinvested in additional common shares by Computershare as agent (the Plan Agent). Shareholders who elect not to participate in the Plan will receive all Dividends in cash paid by check mailed directly to the shareholder of record (or if the shares are held in street or other nominee name, then to the nominee) by the Plan Agent, as dividend disbursing agent. Shareholders whose common shares are held in the name of a broker or nominee should contact the broker or nominee to determine whether and how they may participate in the Plan.
The Plan Agent serves as agent for the shareholders in administering the Plan. After the Fund declares a Dividend, the Plan Agent will, as agent for the shareholders, either: (i) receive the cash payment and use it to buy common shares in the open market, on the NYSE or elsewhere, for the participants accounts or (ii) distribute newly issued common shares of the Fund on behalf of the participants.
The Plan Agent will receive cash from the Fund with which to buy common shares in the open market if, on the Dividend payment date, the NAV per share exceeds the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions on that date. The Plan Agent will receive the Dividend in newly issued common shares of the Fund if, on the Dividend payment date, the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions equals or exceeds the NAV per share of the Fund on that date. The number of shares to be issued will be computed at a per share rate equal to the greater of (i) the NAV or (ii) 95% of the closing market price per share on the payment date.
26
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
If the market price per share is less than the NAV on a Dividend payment date, the Plan Agent will have until the last business day before the next ex-dividend date for the common stock, but in no event more than 30 days after the Dividend payment date (as the case may be, the Purchase Period), to invest the Dividend amount in shares acquired in open market purchases. If at the close of business on any day during the Purchase Period on which NAV is calculated the NAV equals or is less than the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions, the Plan Agent will cease making open market purchases and the uninvested portion of such Dividends shall be filled through the issuance of new shares of common stock from the Fund at the price set forth in the immediately preceding paragraph.
Participants in the Plan may withdraw from the Plan upon notice to the Plan Agent. Such withdrawal will be effective immediately if received not less than ten days prior to a Dividend record date; otherwise, it will be effective for all subsequent Dividends. If any participant elects to have the Plan Agent sell all or part of his or her shares and remit the proceeds, the Plan Agent is authorized to deduct a $15.00 fee plus $0.10 per share brokerage commissions.
The Plan Agents fees for the handling of reinvestment of Dividends will be paid by the Fund. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Plan Agents open market purchases in connection with the reinvestment of Dividends. The automatic reinvestments of Dividends will not relieve participants of any income tax that may be payable or required to be withheld on such Dividends.
The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan. All correspondence concerning the Plan should be directed to the Plan Agent at 800-432-8224.
OTHER INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-330-7348, (ii) on our website at cohenandsteers.com or (iii) on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the Funds proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available by August 31 of each year (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-330-7348 or (ii) on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds Forms N-Q are available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-330-7348 or (ii) on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
Please note that distributions paid by the Fund to shareholders are subject to recharacterization for tax purposes and are taxable up to the amount of the Funds investment company taxable income and net realized gains. Distributions in excess of the Funds net investment company taxable income and realized gains are a return of capital distributed from the Funds assets. To the extent this occurs, the Funds shareholders of record will be notified of the estimated amount of capital returned to shareholders for each such distribution and this information will also be available at cohenandsteers.com. The final tax treatment of all distributions is reported to shareholders on their 1099-DIV forms, which are mailed after the close of each calendar year. Distributions of capital
27
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
decrease the Funds total assets and, therefore, could have the effect of increasing the Funds expense ratio. In addition, in order to make these distributions, the Fund may have to sell portfolio securities at a less than opportune time.
Notice is hereby given in accordance with Rule 23c-1 under the 1940 Act that the Fund may purchase, from time to time, shares of its common stock in the open market.
Change in Board of Directors
Frank K. Ross retired from the Board of Directors on December 31, 2018 pursuant to the Funds mandatory retirement policy.
28
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND
The business and affairs of the Fund are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors approves all significant agreements between the Fund and persons or companies furnishing services to it, including the Funds agreements with its investment advisor, administrator, co-administrator, custodian and transfer agent. The management of the Funds day-to-day operations is delegated to its officers, the investment advisor, administrator and co-administrator, subject always to the investment objective and policies of the Fund and to the general supervision of the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors and officers of the Fund and their principal occupations during at least the past five years are set forth below.
Name, Address and |
Position(s) Held |
Term of |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years Directorships Held) |
Number of |
Length | |||||||
Interested Directors4 | ||||||||||||
Robert H. Steers 1953 |
Director, Chairman | Until Next Election of Directors | Chief Executive Officer of Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (CSCM or the Advisor) and its parent, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) since 2014. Prior to that, Co-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Advisor since 2003 and CNS since 2004. Prior to that, Chairman of the Advisor; Vice President of Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC. | 20 | Since 1991 | |||||||
Joseph M. Harvey 1963 |
Director | Until Next Election of Directors |
President and Chief Investment Officer of the Advisor (since 2003) and President of CNS (since 2004). Prior to that, Senior Vice President and Director of Investment Research of CSCM. | 20 | Since 2014 |
(table continued on next page)
29
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
(table continued from previous page)
Name, Address and |
Position(s) Held |
Term of |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years Directorships Held) |
Number of |
Length | |||||||
Disinterested Directors | ||||||||||||
Michael G. Clark 1965 |
Director | Until Next Election of Directors | From 2006 to 2011, President and Chief Executive Officer of DWS Funds and Managing Director of Deutsche Asset Management. | 20 | Since 2011 | |||||||
George Grossman 1953 |
Director | Until Next Election of Directors | Attorney-at-law. | 20 | Since 1993 | |||||||
Dean A. Junkans 1959 |
Director | Until Next Election of Directors | C.F.A.; Advisor to SigFig since July, 2018; Adjunct Professor and ExecutiveInResidence, Bethel University Since 2015; Chief Investment Officer at Wells Fargo Private Bank from 2004 to 2014 and Chief Investment Officer of the Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement group at Wells Fargo & Company from 2011 to 2014; Former member and Chair, Claritas Advisory Committee at the CFA Institute from 2013 to 2015; Board Member and Investment Committee member, Bethel University Foundation since 2010; formerly Corporate Executive Board Member of the National Chief Investment Officers Circle, 2010 to 2015; formerly, Member of the Board of Governors of the University of Wisconsin Foundation, River Falls, 1996 to 2004; U.S. Army Veteran, Gulf War. | 20 | Since 2015 |
(table continued on next page)
30
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
(table continued from previous page)
Name, Address and |
Position(s) Held |
Term of |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years Directorships Held) |
Number of |
Length | |||||
Gerald J. Maginnis 1955 |
Director | Until Next Election of Directors | Philadelphia Office Managing Partner, KPMG LLP from 2006 to 2015; Partner in Charge, KPMG Pennsylvania Audit Practice from 2002 to 2008; President, Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants (PICPA) from 2014 to 2015; member, PICPA Board of Directors from 2012 to 2016; member, Council of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) from 2013 to 2017; member, Board of Trustees of AICPA Foundation since 2015. | 20 | Since 2015 | |||||
Jane F. Magpiong 1960 |
Director | Until Next Election of Directors | President, Untap Potential since 2013; Senior Managing Director, TIAA-CREF, from 2011 to 2013; National Head of Wealth Management, TIAA-CREF, from 2008 to 2011; and prior to that, President, Bank of America Private Bank from 2005 to 2008. | 20 | Since 2015 |
(table continued on next page)
31
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
(table continued from previous page)
Name, Address and |
Position(s) Held |
Term of |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years Directorships Held) |
Number of |
Length | |||||
Daphne L. Richards 1966 |
Director | Until Next Election of Directors | Independent Director of Cartica Management, LLC since 2015; Member of the Investment Committee of the Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation since 2015; Member of the Advisory Board of Northeast Dutchess Fund since 2016; President and CIO of Ledge Harbor Management since 2016; Formerly, worked at Bessemer Trust Company from 1999 to 2014; Prior thereto, Ms. Richards held investment positions at Frank Russell Company from 1996 to 1999. Union Bank of Switzerland from 1993 to 1996; Credit Suisse from 1990 to 1993; and Hambros International Venture Capital Fund from 1988 to 1989. | 20 | Since 2017 |
(table continued on next page)
32
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
(table continued from previous page)
Name, Address and |
Position(s) Held |
Term of |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years Directorships Held) |
Number of |
Length | |||||
Frank K. Ross 1943 |
Director |
5 |
Visiting Professor of Accounting and Director of the Center for Accounting Education at Howard University School of Business since 2004; Board member and member of Audit Committee (Chairman from 2007 to 2012) and Human Resources and Compensation Committee Member, Pepco Holdings, Inc. (electric utility) from 2004 to 2014; Formerly, Mid-Atlantic Area Managing Partner for Assurance Services at KPMG LLP and Managing Partner of its Washington, DC offices from 1995 to 2003. | 20 | Since 2004 | |||||
C. Edward Ward, Jr. 1946 |
Director | Until Next Election of Directors | Member of The Board of Trustees of Manhattan College, Riverdale, New York from 2004 to 2014. Formerly, Director of closed-end fund management for the NYSE where he worked from 1979 to 2004. | 20 | Since 2004 |
1 | The address for each director is 280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017. |
2 | On March 12, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted a mandatory retirement policy stating a Director must retire from the Board on December 31st of the year in which he or she turns 75 years of age. |
3 | The length of time served represents the year in which the Director was first elected or appointed to any fund in the Cohen & Steers fund complex. |
4 | Interested person as defined in the 1940 Act, of the Fund because of affiliation with CSCM (Interested Directors). |
5 | Frank K. Ross retired from the Board of Directors on December 31, 2018 pursuant to the Funds mandatory retirement policy. |
33
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
The officers of the Fund (other than Messrs. Steers and Harvey, whose biographies are provided above), their address, their year of birth and their principal occupations for at least the past five years are set forth below.
Name, Address and Year of Birth1 |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Principal Occupation During At Least the Past 5 Years |
Length of Time Served2 |
|||
Adam M. Derechin 1964 |
President and Chief Executive Officer | Chief Operating Officer of CSCM since 2003 and CNS since 2004. | Since 2005 | |||
Douglas R. Bond 1959 |
Vice President | Executive Vice President of CSCM since 2004. | Since 2007 | |||
Yigal D. Jhirad 1965 |
Vice President | Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2007. | Since 2007 | |||
Dana A. DeVivo 1981 |
Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2019. Prior to that, Vice President of CSCM since 2013. | Since 2015 | |||
James Giallanza 1966 |
Chief Financial Officer | Executive Vice President of CSCM since 2014. Prior to that, Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2006. | Since 2006 | |||
Albert Laskaj 1977 |
Treasurer | Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2019. Prior to that, Vice President of CSCM since 2015. Prior to that, Director of Legg Mason & Co. since 2013. | Since 2015 | |||
Lisa D. Phelan 1968 |
Chief Compliance Officer | Executive Vice President of CSCM since 2015. Prior to that, Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2008. Chief Compliance Officer of CSCM, the Cohen & Steers funds, Cohen & Steers Asia Limited and CSSL since 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. | Since 2006 |
1 | The address of each officer is 280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017. |
2 | Officers serve one-year terms. The length of time served represents the year in which the officer was first elected as an officer of any fund in the Cohen & Steers fund complex. All of the officers listed above are officers of one or more of the other funds in the complex. |
34
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
Cohen & Steers Privacy Policy
Facts | What Does Cohen & Steers Do With Your Personal Information? | |
Why? | Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do. | |
What? | The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include:
Social Security number and account balances
Transaction history and account transactions
Purchase history and wire transfer instructions | |
How? | All financial companies need to share customers personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers personal information; the reasons Cohen & Steers chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. |
Reasons we can share your personal information | Does Cohen & Steers share? |
Can you limit this sharing? | ||
For our everyday business purposes such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or reports to credit bureaus |
Yes | No | ||
For our marketing purposes to offer our products and services to you |
Yes | No | ||
For joint marketing with other financial companies | No | We dont share | ||
For our affiliates everyday business purposes information about your transactions and experiences |
No | We dont share | ||
For our affiliates everyday business purposes information about your creditworthiness |
No | We dont share | ||
For our affiliates to market to you | No | We dont share | ||
For non-affiliates to market to you | No | We dont share | ||
Questions? Call 800.330.7348 |
35
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
Cohen & Steers Privacy Policy(Continued)
Who we are | ||
Who is providing this notice? | Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc., Cohen & Steers Asia Limited, Cohen & Steers Japan, LLC, Cohen & Steers UK Limited, Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC, Cohen & Steers Private Funds and Cohen & Steers Open and Closed-End Funds (collectively, Cohen & Steers). | |
What we do | ||
How does Cohen & Steers protect my personal information? | To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings. We restrict access to your information to those employees who need it to perform their jobs, and also require companies that provide services on our behalf to protect your information. | |
How does Cohen & Steers collect my personal information? | We collect your personal information, for example, when you:
Open an account or buy securities from us
Provide account information or give us your contact information
Make deposits or withdrawals from your account
We also collect your personal information from other companies. | |
Why cant I limit all sharing? | Federal law gives you the right to limit only:
sharing for affiliates everyday business purposesinformation about your creditworthiness
affiliates from using your information to market to you
sharing for non-affiliates to market to you
State law and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing. | |
Definitions | ||
Affiliates | Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.
Cohen & Steers does not share with affiliates. | |
Non-affiliates | Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.
Cohen & Steers does not share with non-affiliates. | |
Joint marketing | A formal agreement between non-affiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you.
Cohen & Steers does not jointly market. |
36
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
Cohen & Steers Investment Solutions
Distributed by Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC.
Please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of any Cohen & Steers U.S. registered open-end fund carefully before investing. A summary prospectus and prospectus containing this and other information can be obtained by calling 800-330-7348 or by visiting cohenandsteers.com. Please read the summary prospectus and prospectus carefully before investing.
37
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
38
eDelivery AVAILABLE
Stop traditional mail delivery;
receive your shareholder reports
and prospectus online.
Sign up at cohenandsteers.com
Cohen & Steers
Closed-End
Opportunity
Fund
Annual Report December 31, 2018
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of the Funds annual and semi-annual shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports will be made available on the Funds website at www.cohenandsteers.com, and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report.
If you have already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from a Fund electronically anytime by contacting your financial intermediary or, if you are a direct investor, by signing up at www.cohenandsteers.com.
Beginning on January 1, 2019, you may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge. If you invest through a financial intermediary, you can contact your financial intermediary or, if you are a direct investor, you can call (866) 227-0757 to let the Fund know you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all Funds held in your account if you invest through your financial intermediary or all Funds held within the fund complex if you invest directly with the Fund.
FOFAR
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The registrant has adopted an Amended and Restated Code of Ethics that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. The Code of Ethics was in effect during the reporting period. The registrant amended the personal trading blackout period in the Code of Ethics during the reporting period to reflect changes to the timeline for processing Fund distributions. The registrant has not granted any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Ethics as described in Form N-CSR during the reporting period. A current copy of the Code of Ethics is available on the registrants website at https://www.cohenandsteers.com/assets/content/uploads/Code_of_Ethics_for_Principal_Executive_and_Principal_Financial_Officers_of_the_Funds.pdf. Upon request, a copy of the Code of Ethics can be made by calling 800-330-7348 or writing to the Secretary of the registrant, 280 Park Avenue, 10th floor, New York, NY 10017.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The registrants board has determined that Gerald J. Maginnis and Frank K. Ross qualify as audit committee financial experts based on their years of experience in the public accounting profession. The registrants board has determined that Michael G. Clark qualifies as an audit committee financial expert based on his years of experience in the public accounting profession and the investment management and financial services industry. Until December 31, 2018, each of Messrs. Clark, Ross and Maginnis was a member of the boards audit committee, and each was independent as such term is defined in Form N-CSR. Mr. Ross retired from the registrants board on December 31, 2018 pursuant to the Funds mandatory retirement policy and is no longer a member of the boards audit committee. Effective January 1, 2019, each of Messrs. Clark and Maginnis is a member of the boards audit committee, and each is independent as such term is defined in Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) (d) Aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the last two fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 for professional services rendered by the registrants principal accountant were as follows:
2018 | 2017 | |||
Audit Fees |
$42,410 | $41,530 | ||
Audit-Related Fees |
$0 | $0 | ||
Tax Fees |
$5,850 | $5,740 | ||
All Other Fees |
$0 | $0 |
Tax fees were billed in connection with tax compliance services, including the preparation and review of federal and state tax returns and the computation of corporate and franchise tax amounts.
(e)(1) The registrants audit committee is required to pre-approve audit and non-audit services performed for the registrant by the principal accountant. The audit committee also is required to
pre-approve non-audit services performed by the registrants principal accountant for the registrants investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrants investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant, if the engagement for services relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant.
The audit committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members who are independent members of the board of directors of the registrant. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its next scheduled meeting. The audit committee may not delegate its responsibility to pre-approve services to be performed by the registrants principal accountant to the investment advisor.
(e)(2) No services included in (b) (d) above were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the aggregate fees billed by the registrants principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant and for non-audit services rendered to the registrants investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrants investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant were:
2018 | 2017 | |||
Registrant |
$5,850 | $5,740 | ||
Investment Advisor |
$0 | $0 |
(h) The registrants audit committee considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrants investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrants investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not required to be pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X was compatible with maintaining the principal accountants independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of December 31, 2018, the members of the committee were Frank K. Ross (chairman), Michael G. Clark, George Grossman and Gerald J. Maginnis. Mr. Ross retired on December 31, 2018 pursuant to the Funds mandatory retirement policy, and Mr. Maginnis was elected to serve as Audit Committee Chair effective January 1, 2019. Effective January 1, 2019, the members of the committee are Messrs. Maginnis (chairman), Clark and Grossman.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
Included in Item 1 above.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
The registrant has delegated voting of proxies in respect of portfolio holdings to Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (C&S), in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth below.
COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
STATEMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING THE VOTING OF SECURITIES
This statement sets forth the policies and procedures that Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. and its affiliated advisors (Cohen & Steers, we or us) follow in exercising voting rights with respect to securities held in its client portfolios. All proxy-voting rights that are exercised by Cohen & Steers shall be subject to this Statement of Policy and Procedures.
General Proxy Voting Guidelines
Objectives
Voting rights are an important component of corporate governance. Cohen & Steers has three overall objectives in exercising voting rights:
· | Responsibility. Cohen & Steers shall seek to ensure that there is an effective means in place to hold companies accountable for their actions. While management must be accountable to its board, the board must be accountable to a companys shareholders. Although accountability can be promoted in a variety of ways, protecting shareholder voting rights may be among our most important tools. |
· | Rationalizing Management and Shareholder Concerns. Cohen & Steers seeks to ensure that the interests of a companys management and board are aligned with those of the companys shareholders. In this respect, compensation must be structured to reward the creation of shareholder value. |
· | Shareholder Communication. Since companies are owned by their shareholders, Cohen & Steers seeks to ensure that management effectively communicates with its owners about the companys business operations and financial performance. It is only with effective communication that shareholders will be able to assess the performance of management and to make informed decisions on when to buy, sell or hold a companys securities. |
General Principles
In exercising voting rights, Cohen & Steers shall conduct itself in accordance with the general principles set forth below.
· | The ability to exercise a voting right with respect to a security is a valuable right and, therefore, must be viewed as part of the asset itself. |
· | In exercising voting rights, Cohen & Steers shall engage in a careful evaluation of issues that may materially affect the rights of shareholders and the value of the security. |
· | Consistent with general fiduciary principles, the exercise of voting rights shall always be conducted with reasonable care, prudence and diligence. |
· | In exercising voting rights on behalf of clients, Cohen & Steers shall conduct itself in the same manner as if Cohen & Steers were the constructive owner of the securities. |
· | To the extent reasonably possible, Cohen & Steers shall participate in each shareholder voting opportunity. |
· | Voting rights shall not automatically be exercised in favor of management-supported proposals. |
· | Cohen & Steers, and its officers and employees, shall never accept any item of value in consideration of a favorable proxy voting decision. |
General Guidelines
Set forth below are general guidelines that Cohen & Steers shall follow in exercising proxy voting rights:
· | Prudence. In making a proxy voting decision, Cohen & Steers shall give appropriate consideration to all relevant facts and circumstances, including the value of the securities to be voted and the likely effect any vote may have on that value. Since voting rights must be exercised on the basis of an informed judgment, investigation shall be a critical initial step. |
· | Third Party Views. While Cohen & Steers may consider the views of third parties, Cohen & Steers shall never base a proxy voting decision solely on the opinion of a third party. Rather, decisions shall be based on a reasonable and good faith determination as to how best to maximize shareholder value. |
· | Shareholder Value. Just as the decision whether to purchase or sell a security is a matter of judgment, determining whether a specific proxy resolution will increase the market value of a security is a matter of judgment as to which informed parties may differ. In determining how a proxy vote may affect the economic value of a security, Cohen & Steers shall consider both short-term and long-term views about a companys business and prospects, especially in light of our projected holding period on the stock (e.g., Cohen & Steers may discount long-term views on a short-term holding). |
Specific Guidelines
A. Responsibility. Cohen & Steers shall seek to ensure that there is an effective means in place to hold companies accountable for their actions. While management must be accountable to its board, the board must be accountable to a companys shareholders. Although accountability can be promoted in a variety of ways, protecting shareholder voting rights may be among our most important tools.
B. Rationalizing Management and Shareholder Concerns. Cohen & Steers seeks to ensure that the interests of a companys management and board are aligned with those of the companys shareholders. In this respect, compensation must be structured to reward the creation of shareholder value.
C. Shareholder Communication. Since companies are owned by their shareholders, Cohen & Steers seeks to ensure that management effectively communicates with its owners about the companys business operations and financial performance. It is only with effective communication that shareholders will be able to assess the performance of management and to make informed decisions on when to buy, sell or hold a companys securities.
In exercising voting rights, Cohen & Steers follows the general principles set forth below.
| The ability to exercise a voting right with respect to a security is a valuable right and, therefore, must be viewed as part of the asset itself. |
| In exercising voting rights, Cohen & Steers shall engage in a careful evaluation of issues that may materially affect the rights of shareholders and the value of the security. |
| Consistent with general fiduciary principles, the exercise of voting rights shall always be conducted with reasonable care, prudence and diligence. |
| In exercising voting rights on behalf of clients, Cohen & Steers shall conduct itself in the same manner as if Cohen & Steers were the beneficial owners of the securities. |
| To the extent reasonably possible, Cohen & Steers shall participate in each shareholder voting opportunity. |
| Voting rights shall not automatically be exercised in favor of management-supported proposals. |
| Cohen & Steers, and their respective officers and employees, shall never accept any item of value in consideration of a favorable proxy vote. |
Set forth below are general guidelines followed by Cohen & Steers in exercising proxy voting rights:
Prudence. In making a proxy voting decision, Cohen & Steers shall give appropriate consideration to all relevant facts and circumstances, including the value of the securities to be voted and the likely effect any vote may have on that value. Since voting rights must be exercised on the basis of an informed judgment, investigation shall be a critical initial step.
Third Party Views. While Cohen & Steers may consider the views of third parties, Cohen & Steers shall never base a proxy voting decision solely on the opinion of a third party. Rather, decisions shall be based on a reasonable and good faith determination as to how best to maximize shareholder value.
Shareholder Value. Just as the decision whether to purchase or sell a security is a matter of judgment, determining whether a specific proxy resolution will increase the market value of a security is a matter of judgment as to which informed parties may differ. In determining how a proxy vote may affect the economic value of a security, Cohen & Steers shall consider both short-term and long-term views about a companys business and prospects, especially in light of its projected holding period on the stock (e.g., Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. may discount long-term views on a short-term holding).
Voting for Directors Nominees in Uncontested Elections
Votes on director nominees are made on a case-by-case basis using a mosaic approach, where all factors are considered and no single factor is determinative. In evaluating director nominees, Cohen & Steers considers the following factors:
| Whether the nominee attended less than 75 percent of the board and committee meetings without a valid excuse for the absences; |
| Whether the nominee is an inside or affiliated outside director and sits on the audit, compensation, or nominating committees and/or the full board serves as the audit, compensation, or nominating committees or the company does not have one of these committees; |
| Whether the board ignored a significant shareholder proposal that was approved by a majority of the votes cast in the previous year; |
| Whether the board, without shareholder approval, to our knowledge instituted a new poison pill plan, extended an existing plan, or adopted a new plan upon the expiration of an existing plan during the past year; |
| Whether the nominee is the chairman or CEO of a publicly-traded company who serves on more than two (2) public company boards; |
| In the case of nominees other than the chairman or CEO, whether the nominee serves on more than four (4) public company boards; |
| If the nominee is an incumbent director, the length of tenure taking into account tenure limits recommended by local corporate governance codes1; |
| Whether the nominee has a material related party transaction or a material conflict of interest with the company; |
| Whether the nominee (or the entire board) in our view has a record of making poor corporate or strategic decisions or has demonstrated an overall lack of good business judgment; |
| Material failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight2, or fiduciary responsibilities at the company; and |
1 | For example, in the UK, independent directors of publicly traded companies with tenure exceeding nince (9) years are reclassified as non-independent unless the company can explain why they remain independent. |
2 | Examples of failure of risk oversight include, but are not limited to: bribery; large or serial fines from regulatory bodies; significant adverse legal judgments or settlements; hedging of company stock by the employees or directors of a company; or a significant pledging of company stock in the aggregate by the officers and directors of a company. |
| Actions related to a nominees service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about his or her ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company. |
Voting for Director Nominees in Contested Elections
Votes in a contested election of directors are evaluated on a case-by-case basis considering the long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry managements track record, the qualifications of the nominees and other relevant factors.
The Majority Vote for Directors
Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals asking for the board to amend the companys governance documents (charter or bylaws) to provide that director nominees will be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast at an annual meeting of shareholders.
Separation of Chairman and CEO
Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals to separate the CEO and chairman positions. Cohen & Steers does recognize, however, that under certain circumstances, it may be in the companys best interest for the CEO and chairman positions to be held by one person.
The Independent Chairman
Cohen & Steers reviews on a case-by-case basis proposals requiring the chairmans position to be filled by an independent director, taking into account the companys current board leadership and governance structure; company performance, and any other factors that may be relevant.
Lead Independent Directors
In cases where the CEO and chairman roles are combined or the chairman is not independent, Cohen & Steers vote for the appointment of a lead independent director.
Board Independence
Cohen & Steers believes that boards should have a majority of independent directors. Therefore, Cohen & Steers vote for proposals that require the board to be comprised of a majority of independent directors.
Generally, Cohen & Steers considers a director independent if the director satisfies the independence definition set forth in local corporate governance codes and/or the applicable listing standards of the exchange on which the companys stock is listed.
In addition, Cohen & Steers generally considers a director independent if the director has no significant financial, familial or other ties with the company that may pose a conflict, and has not been employed by the company in an executive capacity.
Board Size
Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals to limit the size of the board to 15 members or less.
Classified Boards
Cohen & Steers generally votes in favor of shareholder proposals to declassify a board of directors. In voting on proposals to declassify a board of directors, Cohen & Steers evaluates all facts and circumstances, including whether: (i) the current management and board have a history of making good corporate or strategic decisions and (ii) the proposal is in the best interests of shareholders.
Independent Committees
Cohen & Steers votes for proposals requesting that a boards audit, compensation and nominating committees consist only of independent directors.
Non-Disclosure of Board Compensation
Cohen & Steers generally votes against the election of director nominees at companies if the compensation paid to such directors is not disclosed prior to the meeting. However, Cohen & Steers recognizes that companies in certain emerging markets may have legitimate reasons for not disclosing such compensation. In such cases, if a company discloses a legitimate reason why such compensation should not be disclosed, Cohen & Steers may vote for the nominees even if compensation is not disclosed.
Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability Protection
Cohen & Steers votes in favor of proposals providing indemnification for directors and officers for acts conducted in the normal course of business that is consistent with the law of the jurisdiction of formation. Cohen & Steers alsos vote in favor of proposals that expand coverage for directors and officers where, despite an unsuccessful legal defense, the director or officer acted in good faith and in the best interests of the company. Cohen & Steers votes against proposals that would expand indemnification beyond coverage of legal expenses to coverage of acts, such as gross negligence, that are violations of fiduciary obligations.
Compensation Proposals
Votes on Executive Compensation. Say-on-Pay votes are determined on a case-by-case basis taking into account the reasonableness of the companys compensation structure and the adequacy of the disclosure.
Cohen & Steers generally votes against in cases where there are an unacceptable under of problematic pay practices including:
| Poor linkage between the executives pay and the companys performance and profitability; |
| The presence of objectionable structural features in the compensation plan, such as excessive perquisites, golden parachutes, tax-gross up provisions, and automatic benchmarking of pay in the top half of the peer group; |
| A lack of proportionality in the plan relative to the companys size and peer group. |
Additional Disclosure on Executive and Director Pay. Cohen & Steers generally votes for shareholder proposals that seek additional disclosure of executive and director pay information.
Frequency of Shareholder Votes on Executive Compensation. Cohen & Steers generally votes for annual shareholder advisory votes to approve executive compensation.
Golden Parachutes. In general, Cohen & Steers votes against golden parachutes because they impede potential takeovers that shareholders should be free to consider. Cohen & Steers opposes the use of employment agreements that result in excessive cash payments and generally withhold our vote at the next shareholder meeting for directors who approved golden parachutes.
In the context of an acquisition, merger, consolidation, or proposed sale, Cohen & Steers votes on a case-by-case basis on proposals to approve golden parachute payments. Factors that may result to a vote against include:
| Potentially excessive severance payments; |
| Agreements that include excessive excise tax gross-up provisions; |
| Single-trigger payments upon a Change in Control (CIC), including cash payments and the acceleration of performance-based equity despite the failure to achieve performance measures; |
| Single-trigger vesting of equity based on a definition of change in control that requires only shareholder approval of the transaction (rather than consummation); |
| Recent amendments or other changes that may make packages so attractive as to encourage transactions that may not be in the best interests of shareholders; or |
| The companys assertion that a proposed transaction is conditioned on shareholder approval of the golden parachute advisory vote. |
Equity Compensation Plans. Votes on proposals related to compensation plans are determined on a case-by-case basis taking into account plan features and equity grant practices, where positive factors may counterbalance negative factors (and vice versa), as evaluated based on three pillars:
| Plan Cost: the total estimated cost of the companys equity plans relative to industry/market cap peers measured by the companys estimated shareholder value transfer (SVT) in relation to peers, considering: |
| SVT based on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants, plus outstanding unvested/unexercised grants; and |
| SVT based only on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants. |
| Plan Features: |
| Automatic single-triggered award vesting upon CIC; |
| Discretionary vesting authority; |
| Liberal share recycling on various award types; and |
| Minimum vesting period for grants made under the plan. |
| Grant Practices: |
| The companys three year burn rate relative to its industry/market cap peers; |
| Vesting requirements for most recent CEO equity grants (3-year look-back); |
| The estimated duration of the plan based on the sum of shares remaining available and the new shares requested divided by the average annual shares granted in the prior three years; |
| The proportion of the CEOs most recent equity grants/awards subject to performance conditions; |
| Whether the company maintains a claw-back policy; and |
| Whether the company has established post exercise/vesting share-holding requirements. |
Cohen & Steers generally votes against compensation plan proposals if the combination of factors indicates that the plan is not, overall, in the shareholders interest, or if any of the following apply:
| Awards may vest in connection with a liberal CIC; |
| The plan would permit re-pricing or cash buyout of underwater options without shareholder approval; |
| The plan is a vehicle for problematic pay practices or a pay-for-performance disconnect; or |
| Any other plan features that are determined to have a significant negative impact on shareholder interests. |
Transferable Stock Options. Cohen & Steers evaluates on a case-by-case basis proposals to grant transferable stock options or otherwise permit the transfer of outstanding stock options, including cost of proposal and alignment with shareholder interests.
Approval of Cash or Cash-and-Stock Bonus Plans. Cohen & Steers votes to approve cash or cash-and-stock bonus plans that seek to exempt executive compensation from limits on deductibility imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Employee Stock Purchase Plans. Cohen & Steers votes for the approval of employee stock purchase plans, although Cohen & Steers generally believes the discounted purchase price should not exceed 15% of the current market price.
401(k) Employee Benefit Plans. Cohen & Steers votes for proposals to implement a 401(k) savings plan for employees.
Stock Ownership Requirements. Cohen & Steers supports proposals requiring senior executives and directors to hold a minimum amount of stock in a company (often expressed as a percentage of annual compensation), which may include restricted stock or restricted stock units.
Stock Holding Periods. Cohen & Steers generally votes against proposals requiring executives to hold stock received upon option exercise for a specific period of time.
Recovery of Incentive Compensation. Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals to recover incentive bonuses or other incentive payments made to senior executives if it is later determined that fraud, misconduct, or negligence significantly contributed to a restatement of financial results that led to the award of incentive compensation.
Capital Structure Changes and Anti-Takeover Proposals
Increase to Authorized Shares. Cohen & Steers generally votes for increases in authorized shares, provided that the increase is not greater than three times the number of shares outstanding and reserved for issuance (including shares reserved for stock-related plans and securities convertible into common stock, but not shares reserved for any poison pill plan).
Blank Check Preferred Stock. Cohen & Steers generally votes against proposals authorizing the creation of new classes of preferred stock without specific voting, conversion, distribution and other rights, and proposals to increase the number of authorized blank check preferred shares. Cohen & Steers may vote in favor of these proposals if Cohen & Steers receives reasonable assurances that (i) the preferred stock was authorized by the board for legitimate capital formation purposes and not for anti-takeover purposes, and (ii) no preferred stock will be issued
with voting power that is disproportionate to the economic interests of the preferred stock. These representations should be made either in the proxy statement or in a separate letter from the company to us.
Pre-emptive Rights. Cohen & Steers generally votes against the issuance of equity shares with pre-emptive rights. However, Cohen & Steers may vote for shareholder pre-emptive rights where such pre-emptive rights are necessary taking in to account the best interests of the companys shareholders. In addition, we acknowledge that international local practices may call for shareholder pre-emptive rights when a company seeks authority to issue shares (e.g., UK authority for the issuance of only up to 5% of outstanding shares without pre-emptive rights). While Cohen & Steers prefers that companies be permitted to issue shares without pre-emptive rights, in deference to international local practices, Cohen & Steers will approve issuance requests with pre-emptive rights.
Dual Class Capitalizations. Because classes of common stock with unequal voting rights limit the rights of certain shareholders, we vote against adoption of a dual or multiple class capitalization structure. Cohen & Steers supports the one-share, one-vote principle for voting.
Restructurings/Recapitalizations. Cohen & Steers reviews proposals to increase common and/or preferred shares and to issue shares as part of a debt restructuring plan on a case-by-case basis. In voting, Cohen & Steers considers the following issues:
| Dilution: how much will the ownership interest of existing shareholders be reduced, and how extreme will dilution to any future earnings be? |
| Change in control: will the transaction result in a change in control of the company? |
| Bankruptcy: generally, approve proposals that facilitate debt restructurings unless there are clear signs of self-dealing or other abuses. |
Share Repurchase Programs. Cohen & Steers generally votes in favor of such programs where the repurchase would be in the long-term best interests of shareholders and where we believe that this is a good use of the companys cash.
Cohen & Steers will vote against such programs when shareholders interests could be better served by deployment of the cash for alternative uses, or where the repurchase is a defensive maneuver or an attempt to entrench management.
Targeted Share Placements. Cohen & Steers votes these proposals on a case-by-case basis. These proposals ask companies to seek shareholder approval before placing 10% or more of their voting stock with a single investor. The proposals are typically in reaction to the placement of a large block of voting stock in an employee stock option plan, parent capital fund or with a single friendly investor, with the aim of protecting the company against a hostile tender offer.
Shareholder Rights Plans. Cohen & Steers reviews on a case-by-case basis proposals to ratify shareholder rights plans taking into consideration the length of the plan.
Reincorporation Proposals. Proposals to change a companys jurisdiction of incorporation are examined on a case-by-case basis. When evaluating such proposals, Cohen & Steers reviews managements rationale for the proposal, changes to the charter/bylaws, and differences in the applicable laws governing the companies.
Voting on State Takeover Statutes. Cohen & Steers reviews on a case-by-case basis proposals to opt in or out of state takeover statutes (including control share acquisition statutes, control share cash-out statutes, freeze-out provisions, fair price provisions, stakeholder laws, poison pill endorsements, severance pay and labor contract provisions and disgorgement provisions). In voting on these shareholder proposals, Cohen & Steers takes into account whether the proposal is in the long-term best interests of the company and whether it would be in the best interests of the company to thwart a shareholders attempt to control the board of directors.
Mergers and Corporate Restructurings
Mergers and Acquisitions. Votes on mergers and acquisitions should be considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the anticipated financial and operating benefits, offer price (cost vs. premium), prospects of the combined companies, how the deal was negotiated and changes in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder rights.
Cohen & Steers votes against proposals that require a super-majority of shareholders to approve a merger or other significant business combination.
Nonfinancial Effects of a Merger or Acquisition. Some companies have proposed charter provisions that specify that the board of directors may examine the nonfinancial effects of a merger or acquisition on the company. This provision would allow the board to evaluate the impact a proposed change in control would have on employees, host communities, suppliers and/or others. Cohen & Steers generally vote against proposals to adopt such charter provisions. Directors should base their decisions solely on the financial interests of the shareholders.
Spin-offs. Cohen & Steers evaluates spin-offs on a case-by-case basis taking into account the tax and regulatory advantages, planned use of sale proceeds, market focus, and managerial incentives.
Asset Sales. Cohen & Steers evaluates asset sales on a case-by-case basis taking into account the impact on the balance sheet/working capital, value received for the asset, and potential elimination of diseconomies.
Liquidations. Cohen & Steers evaluates liquidations on a case-by-case basis taking into account managements efforts to pursue other alternatives, appraisal value of assets and the compensation plan for executives managing the liquidation.
Ratification of Auditors
Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals to ratify auditors, auditor remuneration and/or proposals authorizing the board to fix audit fees, unless:
| an auditor has a financial interest in or association with the company, and is therefore not independent; |
| there is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered an opinion that is neither accurate nor indicative of the companys financial position; |
| the name of the proposed auditor and/or fees paid to the audit firm are not disclosed by the company prior to the meeting; |
| the auditors are being changed without explanation; or |
| fees paid for non-audit related services are excessive and/or exceed fees paid for audit services or limits set in local best practice recommendations or law. |
Where fees for non-audit services include fees related to significant one-time capital structure events, initial public offerings, bankruptcy emergence, and spinoffs, and the company makes public disclosure of the amount and nature of those fees, then such fees may be excluded from the non-audit fees considered in determining whether non-audit related fees are excessive.
Auditor Rotation
Cohen & Steers evaluates auditor rotation proposals on a case-by-case basis taking into account the following factors: the tenure of the audit firm; establishment and disclosure of a review process whereby the auditor is regularly evaluated for both audit quality and competitive price; length of the rotation period advocated in the proposal; and any significant audit related issues.
Auditor Indemnification
Cohen & Steers generally votes against auditor indemnification and limitation of liability. However, Cohen & Steers recognizes there may be situations where indemnification and limitations on liability may be appropriate.
Shareholder Access and Voting Proposals
Proxy Access. Cohen & Steers reviews proxy access proposals on a case-by-case basis taking into account the parameters of proxy access use in light of a companys specific circumstances. Cohen & Steers generally supports proposals that provide shareholders with a reasonable opportunity to use the right without stipulating overly restrictive or onerous parameters for use and also provide assurances that the mechanism will not be subject to abuse by short-term investors, investors without a substantial investment in the company or investors seeking to take control of the board.
Bylaw Amendments. Cohen & Steers votes on a case-by-case basis on proposals requesting companies grant shareholders the ability to amend bylaws. Similar to proxy access, Cohen & Steers generally supports proposals that provide assurances that this right will not be subject to abuse by short-term investors or investors without a substantial investment in a company.
Reimbursement of Proxy Solicitation Expenses. In the absence of compelling reasons, the Advisor and the Subadvisors will generally not support such proposals.
Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings. Cohen & Steers votes on a case-by-case basis on shareholder proposals requesting companies amend their governance documents (bylaws and/or charter) in order to allow shareholders to call special meetings.
Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent. Cohen & Steers generally votes against proposals to allow or facilitate shareholder action by written consent to provide reasonable protection of minority shareholder rights.
Shareholder Ability to Alter the Size of the Board. Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals that seek to fix the size of the board and vote against proposals that give the board the ability to alter the size of the board without shareholder approval. While Cohen & Steers recognizes the importance of such proposals, these proposals may be set forth in order to promote the agenda(s) of certain special interest groups and could be disruptive to the management of the company.
Cumulative Voting. Having the ability to cumulate votes for the election of directors (i.e., to cast more than one vote for a director) generally increases shareholders rights to effect change in the management of a corporation. However, Cohen & Steers acknowledges that cumulative voting promotes special candidates who may not represent the interests of all, or even a majority, of shareholders. Therefore, when voting on proposals to institute cumulative voting, Cohen & Steers evaluates all facts and circumstances surrounding such proposal and generally vote against cumulative voting where the company has good corporate governance practices in place, including majority voting for board elections and de-classified boards.
Supermajority Vote Requirements. Cohen & Steers generally supports proposals that seek to lower supermajority voting requirements.
Confidential Voting. Cohen & Steers votes for shareholder proposals requesting that companies adopt confidential voting, use independent tabulators, and use independent inspectors of election as long as such proposals permit management to request that the dissident groups honor its confidential voting policy in the case of proxy contests.
Cohen & Steers also votes for management proposals to adopt confidential voting.
Date/Location of Meeting. Cohen & Steers votes against shareholder proposals to change the date or location of the shareholders meeting.
Adjourn Meeting if Votes are Insufficient. Cohen & Steers generally votes against open-end requests for adjournment of a shareholder meeting. However, where management specifically states the reason for requesting an adjournment and the requested adjournment is necessary to permit a proposal that would otherwise be supported under this policy to be carried out, the adjournment request will be supported.
Disclosure of Shareholder Proponents. Cohen & Steers votes for shareholder proposals requesting that companies disclose the names of shareholder proponents. Shareholders may wish to contact the proponents of a shareholder proposal for additional information.
Environmental and Social Proposals
Cohen & Steers believes that well-managed companies should be evaluating and assessing how environmental and social matters may enhance or protect shareholder value. However, because of the diverse nature of environmental and social proposals, we evaluate these proposals on a case-by-case basis. The principles guiding the evaluation of these proposals are whether implementation of a proposal is likely to enhance or protect shareholder value and whether a proposal can be implemented at a reasonable cost.
Environmental Proposals (SP). Cohen & Steers acknowledges that environmental considerations can pose significant investment risks and opportunities. Therefore, we generally vote in favor of proposals requesting a company disclose information that will aid in the determination of shareholder value creation or destruction, taking into consideration the following factors:
| Whether the issues presented have already been effectively dealt with through governmental regulation or legislation; |
| Whether the disclosure is available to shareholders from the company or from a publicly available source; and |
| Whether implementation would reveal proprietary or confidential information that could place the company at a competitive disadvantage. |
Social Proposals (SP). Cohen & Steers believes board and workforce diversity are beneficial t the decision-making process and can enhance long-term profitability. Therefore, we generally vote in favor of proposals that seek to increase board and workforce diversity. We vote all other social proposals on a case-by-case basis, including, but not limited to, proposals related to political and charitable contributions, lobbying, and gender equality and the gender pay gap.
Miscellaneous Proposals
Bundled Proposals. Cohen & Steers reviews on a case-by-case basis bundled or conditioned proposals. For items that are conditioned upon each other, Cohen & Steers examines the benefits and costs of the bundled items. In instances where the combined effect of the conditioned items is not in shareholders best interests, Cohen & Steers votes against the proposals. If the combined effect is positive, Cohen & Steers supports such proposals. In the case of bundled director proposals, Cohen & Steers will vote for the entire slate only if Cohen & Steers would have otherwise voted for each director on an individual basis.
Other Business. Cohen & Steers generally votes against proposals to approve other business where Cohen & Steers cannot determine the exact nature of the proposal(s) to be voted on.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies.
Information pertaining to the portfolio manager of the registrant, as of March 11, 2019, is set forth below.
Douglas R. Bond
· Vice President
· Portfolio manager since inception |
Executive Vice President of CSCM since 2004. |
The portfolio manager listed above manages other investment companies and/or investment vehicles and accounts in addition to the registrant. The following tables show, as of December 31, 2018, the number of other accounts the portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets in the accounts managed within each category. The portfolio manager does not receive performance-based fees with respect to any of the registered investment companies, other pooled investment vehicles or other accounts that he manages.
Douglas Bond | Number of accounts | Total assets | ||
· Registered investment companies |
1 | $266,482,013 | ||
· Other pooled investment vehicles |
0 | $0 | ||
· Other accounts |
4 | $187,932,979 |
Share Ownership. The following table indicates the dollar range of securities of the registrant owned by the registrants portfolio manager as of December 31, 2018:
Dollar Range of Securities Owned
| ||
Douglas R. Bond |
$100,001-$500,000 |
Conflicts of Interest. It is possible that conflicts of interest may arise in connection with the portfolio managers management of the registrants investments on the one hand and the investments of other accounts or vehicles for which the portfolio managers are responsible on the other. For example, a portfolio manager may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time, resources and investment opportunities among the registrant and the other accounts or vehicles he advises. In addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions among the registrant and the other accounts, a portfolio manager may take action with respect to another account that differs from the action taken with respect to the registrant.
In some cases, another account managed by a portfolio manager may provide more revenue to the registrants investment advisor. While this may appear to create additional conflicts of interest for the portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities, the investment advisor strives to ensure that portfolio managers endeavor to exercise their discretion in a manner that is equitable to all interested persons. In this regard, in the absence of specific account-related impediments (such as client-imposed restrictions or lack of available cash), it is the policy of the investment advisor to allocate investment ideas pro rata to all accounts with the same primary investment objective.
In addition, certain of the portfolio managers may from time to time manage one or more accounts on behalf of the registrants investment advisor and its affiliated companies (the CNS Accounts). Certain securities held and traded in the CNS Accounts also may be held and traded in one or more client accounts. It is the policy of the investment advisor however not to put the interests of the CNS Accounts ahead of the interests of client accounts. The investment advisor may aggregate orders of client accounts with those of the CNS Accounts; however, under no circumstances will preferential treatment be given to the CNS Accounts. For all orders involving the CNS Accounts, purchases or sales will be allocated prior to trade placement, and orders that are only partially filled will be allocated across all accounts in proportion to the shares each account, including the CNS Accounts, was designated to receive prior to trading. As a result, it is expected that the CNS Accounts will receive the same average price as other accounts included in the aggregated order. Shares will not be allocated or re-allocated to the CNS Accounts after trade execution or after the average price is known. In the event so few shares of an order are executed that a pro-rata allocation is not practical, a rotational system of allocation may be used; however, the CNS Accounts will never be part of that rotation or receive shares of a partially filled order other than on a pro-rata basis.
Because certain CNS Accounts are managed with a cash management objective, it is possible that a security will be sold out of the CNS Accounts but continue to be held for one or more client accounts. In situations when this occurs, such security will remain in a client account only if the portfolio manager, acting in its reasonable judgment and consistent with its fiduciary duties, believes this is appropriate for, and consistent with the objectives and profile of, the client account.
Advisor Compensation Structure. Compensation of the investment advisors portfolio managers and other investment professionals has three primary components: (1) a base salary, (2) an annual cash bonus and (3) long-term stock-based compensation consisting generally of restricted stock units of the investment advisors parent, CNS. The investment advisors investment professionals, including the portfolio managers, also receive certain retirement, insurance and other benefits that are broadly available to all of its employees. Compensation of the investment advisors investment professionals is reviewed primarily on an annual basis. Cash bonuses, stock-based compensation awards, and adjustments in base salary are typically paid or put into effect in the January following the fiscal year-end of CNS.
Method to Determine Compensation. The registrants investment advisor compensates its portfolio managers based primarily on the total return performance of funds and accounts managed by the portfolio manager versus appropriate peer groups or benchmarks. C&S uses a variety of benchmarks to evaluate each portfolio managers performance for compensation purposes, including the Morningstar U.S. All Taxable Ex-Foreign Equity Index and other broad based indexes based on the asset classes managed by each portfolio manager. In evaluating the performance of a portfolio manager, primary emphasis is normally placed on one- and three-year performance, with secondary consideration of performance over longer periods of time. Performance is evaluated on a pre-tax and pre-expense basis. In addition to rankings within peer groups of funds on the basis of absolute performance, consideration may also be given to risk-adjusted performance. For funds and accounts with a primary investment objective of high current income, consideration will also be given to the funds and accounts success in achieving this objective. For portfolio managers responsible for multiple funds and accounts, investment performance is evaluated on an aggregate basis. The investment advisor has two funds or accounts with performance-based advisory fees. Portfolio managers are also evaluated on the basis of their success in managing their dedicated team of analysts. Base compensation for portfolio managers of the Advisor varies in line with the portfolio managers seniority and position with the firm.
Salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation are also influenced by the operating performance of the registrants investment advisor and CNS. While the annual salaries of the Advisors portfolio managers are fixed, cash bonuses and stock based compensation may fluctuate significantly from year to year, based on changes in manager performance and other factors.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
None.
Note: On December 4, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Fund approved continuation of the delegation of its authority to management to effect repurchases, pursuant to managements discretion and subject to market conditions and investment considerations, of up to 10% of the Funds common shares outstanding (Share Repurchase Program) as of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrants Board implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to this Item.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, based upon such officers evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
(a) The Fund did not engage in any securities lending activity during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
(b) The Fund did not engage in any securities lending activity and did not engage a securities lending agent during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
Item 13. Exhibits.
(a)(1) The amended Code of Ethics is filed herewith.
(a) (2) Certifications of principal executive officer and principal financial officer as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(a)(4) Not applicable.
(b) Certifications of principal executive officer and principal financial officer as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COHEN & STEERS CLOSED-END OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
By: | /s/ Adam M. Derechin | |||
Name: Adam M. Derechin Title: President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: | March 11, 2019 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: | /s/ Adam M. Derechin | |||
Name: Adam M. Derechin Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
By: | /s/ James Giallanza | |||
Name: James Giallanza Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||
Date: March 11, 2019 |