UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
☑ Filed by the registrant | ☐ Filed by a party other than the registrant |
Check the appropriate box:
| ||||
☐
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
| |||
☐
|
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14A-6(E)(2))
| |||
☑
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
| |||
☐
|
Definitive Additional Materials
| |||
☐
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
|
AMGEN INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):
| ||||
☑
|
No fee required.
| |||
☐
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
| |||
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
| |||
☐
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
| |||
☐ |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
| |||
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
(3)
|
Filing Party:
| |||
(4)
|
Date Filed: |
Robert A. Bradway Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President | ||
|
||
Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799 |
April 8, 2019
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are invited to attend the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting, of Amgen Inc. to be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., local time, at the Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, California 91362.
Our Mission and Strategy: We seek to develop innovative medicines that address important unmet medical needs in the fight against serious illness. This objective is the central underpinning of our strategy which includes an integrated set of activities to strengthen our competitive position in our industry. In addition to our significant commitment to innovative research and development and the commercialization of the medicines we make, we are developing branded biosimilars which utilize our industry-leading biologics manufacturing skills. We are doing this while investing for long-term growth, deploying next-generation biomanufacturing facilities, expanding our global geographic reach, improving drug delivery systems, and building on our recent transformation successes to more efficiently bring our discoveries out of the lab and to patients worldwide. While investing in all these activities, we have simultaneously maintained a disciplined approach to capital allocation through which we invest in our future while also returning capital to stockholders. The consistent, strong execution of our strategy results in solving complex problems in biotechnology that benefit patients, building a long-lasting business, and generating long-term stockholder value.
Execution on Our Strategy in 2018: We launched several medicines, including Aimovig®*, the first calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitor approved for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults, Parsabiv®, for secondary hyperparathyroidism, and our first two biosimilars, KANJINTI (biosimilar trastuzumab (Herceptin®)) and AMGEVITA (biosimilar adalimumab (HUMIRA®)), in Europe. Recognizing the urgent need presented by cardiovascular disease, we also took significant actions in 2018 to address affordability challenges for patients who would benefit from Repatha® (our medicine to dramatically reduce low-density lipoprotein (bad) cholesterol), making it available in the U.S. at a 60% reduction from the medicines original list price. We advanced our early oncology pipeline. We also broke ground on our new next-generation biomanufacturing plant in Rhode Island in 2018. This new plant will be the first of its kind in the U.S. and will use our proven next-generation biomanufacturing capabilities to reliably supply medicines and meet the need of every patient, every time. In the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy, we further discuss our progress against our strategic priorities in 2018.
Our Transformation: 2018 was the capstone year for a set of ambitious non-GAAP financial commitments we made to our stockholders five years ago, including earnings per share growth, operating margin improvement, and return of capital. As we previously reported, we met and exceeded these targets. The larger goal of our transformation, however, was to enhance our ability to compete. And here too, weve made great progress. Over the past five years, we launched nine new products, including in two new therapeutic areas, expanded our global presence to approximately 100 countries, generated our largest ever number of innovative and first-in-class molecules in our pipeline, reduced our development cycle time by an average of approximately 36 months, expanded our industry-leading human genetics capabilities, established a biosimilars business, and deployed a first of its kind, highly-efficient, next-generation biologics manufacturing capability. While our transformation is not complete, were in a much better position than ever before to serve patients and to deliver long-term growth.
Stockholder Engagement: We are also guided by the perspectives of our stockholders as expressed through direct engagement with us throughout the year and at our Annual Meeting. Since our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, in addition to outreach by our executives and Investor Relations department to our investors owning approximately 58% of our outstanding shares, we have engaged in governance-focused outreach activities and discussions with the governance teams for stockholders comprising approximately 53% of our outstanding shares. Topics discussed included our business and financial performance, our environmental, sustainability, and governance programs, executive compensation (including its direct link to our business strategy), and product pricing. Feedback received during these meetings is shared with the full Board of Directors and informs Board decisions. We are eager to continue this valuable dialogue with our investors in the coming year.
I look forward to sharing more about our Company at the Annual Meeting. In addition to the business to be transacted and described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, I will discuss recent developments during the past year, the substantial progress we made on our strategic priorities for 2018, and respond to comments and questions.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I thank you for your participation and investment in Amgen. We look forward to seeing you on May 21. As a final note, and also on behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to thank Frank Herringer, who is not standing for re-election, for his years of wise counsel and guidance for Amgen.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Bradway
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President
*Jointly | developed in collaboration with Novartis AG. |
Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, California 91320-1799 |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To be Held on May 21, 2019
To the Stockholders of Amgen Inc.:
Date and Time: |
Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., local time | |||
Location: |
Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, California 91362 | |||
Record Date: |
March 22, 2019. Amgen stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and vote at, the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting, and any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof. | |||
Mail Date: |
We intend to mail the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, or the proxy statement and proxy card, as applicable, on or about April 8, 2019, to our stockholders of record on the record date. | |||
Items of Business: | ||||
1. |
To elect 12 directors to the Board of Directors of Amgen for a term of office expiring at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. The nominees for election to the Board of Directors are Dr. Wanda M. Austin, Mr. Robert A. Bradway, Dr. Brian J. Druker, Mr. Robert A. Eckert, Mr. Greg C. Garland, Mr. Fred Hassan, Dr. Rebecca M. Henderson, Mr. Charles M. Holley, Jr., Dr. Tyler Jacks, Ms. Ellen J. Kullman, Dr. Ronald D. Sugar, and Dr. R. Sanders Williams; | |||
2. |
To hold an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation; | |||
3. |
To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019; and | |||
4. |
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof. | |||
Attendance: If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need an admittance ticket and proof of ownership of our Common Stock as of the close of business on March 22, 2019. Please read INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATIONAttendance at the Annual Meeting in the accompanying proxy statement. |
Voting: Your vote is important, regardless of the number of shares that you own. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. Please read the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement with care and follow the voting instructions to ensure that your shares are represented. By submitting your proxy promptly, you will save the Company the expense of further proxy solicitation. We encourage you to submit your proxy as soon as possible by Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning all proxy cards or instruction forms provided to you.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Jonathan P. Graham
Secretary
Thousand Oaks, California
April 8, 2019
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
This summary contains highlights about our Company and the upcoming 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in advance of the meeting and we encourage you to read the entire proxy statement before voting.
2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Date and Time: |
Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., local time | |
Location: |
Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, California 91362 | |
Record Date: |
March 22, 2019 | |
Mail Date: |
We intend to mail the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, or the proxy statement and proxy card, as applicable, on or about April 8, 2019, to our stockholders. |
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
Matter
|
Our Board Vote Recommendation
| |||
Item 1:
|
Election of 12 Nominees to the Board of Directors (page 6)
|
FOR each Director Nominee
| ||
Item 2:
|
Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation (page 28)
|
FOR
| ||
Item 3:
|
Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants (page 91)
|
FOR
|
How to Vote
|
By Internet: You may submit a proxy over the Internet by following the instructions on the website referred to in the Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form mailed to you. You will need the control number that appears on your Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form. | |
|
By Telephone: You may submit a proxy by telephone by following the instructions on the website referred to in the Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form mailed to you. You will need the control number that appears on your Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form. | |
|
By Mail: If you received a full paper set of materials, date and sign your proxy card or voting instruction form and mail it in the enclosed, postage-paid envelope. If you received a Notice, you may request a proxy card by following the instructions on your Notice. You do not need to mail the proxy card if you are voting by Internet or telephone. | |
|
In Person: If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need an admittance ticket and proof of ownership of our Common Stock as of the close of business on March 22, 2019. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may request a ballot at the Annual Meeting. Please note that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank, trust, or other nominee, and you decide to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting, your vote in person at the Annual Meeting will not be effective unless you present a legal proxy, issued in your name from the record holder (your broker, bank, trust, or other nominee). Please read INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATIONAttendance at the Annual Meeting. Even if you intend to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to submit your proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 1
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
Item 1: Election of 12 Nominees to the Board of Directors (Page 6)
Nominee |
Independent | Age | |
Director Since |
|
Audit |
|
Governance and Nominating |
|
Executive |
|
Compensation and Management Development |
|
|
Equity Award |
|
|
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
✓
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
56
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian J. Druker
|
|
✓
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
✓
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
C
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
✓
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fred Hassan
|
|
✓
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
✓
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
|
|
✓
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
✓
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
✓
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
✓
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
C
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
✓
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
C | indicates Chair of the committee. |
M | indicates member of the committee. |
Corporate Governance Highlights and Best Practices
* | For our director nominees. |
2 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
We Have Implemented Governance Best Practices
We continuously monitor developments and best practices in corporate governance and consider stockholder feedback when enhancing our governance structures. Below are highlights of our key governance practices:
Effective Board Leadership and Independent Oversight |
✓ Highly Independent Board 11 of our 12 director nominees (page 21)
✓ Strong Refreshment Practices With 5 New Directors Since 2015 Average Board tenure of approximately 5 years for our director nominees (pages 7 and 14)
✓ Annual Anonymous Board and Committee Evaluation Process (pages 14 and 20-21)
✓ All Directors Meet Our Board of Directors Guidelines for Director Qualifications and Evaluations (Appendix A)
✓ Robust Lead Independent Director Role (page 15)
✓ Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Committee (page 23)
✓ Enterprise Risk Management Program and Annual Detailed Compensation Risk Analysis overseen by Board and Compensation and Management Development Committee, respectively (pages 16-17 and 26-27)
|
|||
Focus on Stockholder Rights |
✓ Proxy Access (pages 15 and 99) up to 20 eligible stockholders that own 3% of shares for 3 years who meet the requirements set forth in our Bylaws can nominate director nominees constituting up to the greater of 20% of the total directors or two nominees
✓ Majority Voting Standard for Director Elections (pages 14 and 97)
✓ Stockholders* May Act By Written Consent (page 15)
✓ Stockholders* Have a Right to Call Special Meetings (15% threshold requirement) (page 15)
✓ No Supermajority Vote Provisions in Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws (page 15)
✓ No Poison Pill (page 15)
|
|||
History of Transparency and Accountability |
✓ Significant Stock Ownership Requirements for Officers and Directors (pages 62 and 84)
✓ Regular Engagement With Stockholders to Seek Feedback (page 41)
✓ We Continue to Seek Mechanisms to Lower the Cost Burden on Society of Serious Diseases
✓ We Have Demonstrated our Commitment to Environmentally Responsible Operations, Improving Patient Access to Medicines, Science Education, and our Community (page 24)
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE 12 NAMED NOMINEES.
|
||||
|
* | Who meet the requirements set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 3
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
Item 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive
Compensation (Page 28)
2018 Total Target Direct Compensation Mix
| A significant majority of each Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, compensation is at-risk and dependent on our performance and execution of our strategic priorities. |
| We use median values as the reference point for each element of compensation at all levels, including our NEOs. We consider performance, job scope, and contribution in our final pay decisions. |
| Our compensation program is directly linked to our performance and strategy. Each year, our Compensation and Management Development Committee approves Company performance goals under our annual cash incentive programs that are designed to focus our staff on delivering financial and operational objectives to drive annual performance, advance strategic priorities, and position us for longer-term success. |
| 80% of our annual long-term incentive, or LTI, equity award grants are performance-based, aligning compensation with long-term value creation for our stockholders. Three-year performance units comprise 50% of our LTI equity award grants for the 2016-2018 performance period and the goal design and all measurement targets are established at the beginning of the three-year performance period. Our 2016-2018 performance units were earned for a performance period ending December 31, 2018, based on the Companys performance on three equally weighted annual non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or non-GAAP, operating measures of earnings per share, or EPS, growth, operating margin, and operating expense as measured against the pre-established targets for each of the three years. |
* | Mr. Gordon and Dr. Reese are not included in the pie chart because they commenced their roles as executive officers of our Company on September 3, 2018, and July 26, 2018, respectively. |
4 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
2018 Performance Against Pre-Established Goals and Measures
2018 Annual Cash Incentive Program
|
2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Performance Award Payout
| |||||||
Goal
|
Weighting
|
% of Target Earned
|
||||||
Financial Performance
| ||||||||
Revenues
|
|
30%
|
|
224.7%
| ||||
Non-GAAP Net Income(1)
|
|
30%
|
|
186.5%
| ||||
Progress Innovative Pipeline
| ||||||||
Advance Early Pipeline
|
|
5%
|
|
113.9%
| ||||
Execute Key Clinical Studies and Regulatory Filings
|
|
20%
|
|
120.8%
| ||||
Deliver Annual Priorities
| ||||||||
Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives
|
|
10%
|
|
71.3%
| ||||
Achieve Transformation Objectives
|
|
5%
|
|
124.2%
| ||||
Final Score
|
|
Achieved 166.6%
|
(1) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
(2) | The operating measures of the 2016-2018 performance units were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION INDICATING THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANYS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
|
Item 3: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants (Page 91)
| The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP, or Ernst & Young, as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. |
| Ernst & Young has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since the Companys inception in 1980. |
| Each year, the Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications and performance of the Companys independent registered public accountants and determines whether to re-engage the current independent registered public accountants. |
| Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of Ernst & Young is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS.
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 5
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Election of Directors
Nominees to the Board
Nominee |
Independent | Age | |
Director Since |
|
Audit |
|
Governance and Nominating |
|
Executive |
|
Compensation and Management Development |
|
|
Equity Award |
|
|
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
✓
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
56
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian J. Druker
|
|
✓
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
✓
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
C
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
✓
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fred Hassan
|
|
✓
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
✓
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
|
|
✓
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
✓
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
✓
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
✓
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
C
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
✓
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
C | indicates Chair of the committee. |
M | indicates member of the committee. |
6 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Summary of Director Nominee Core Experiences and Skills
Our Board possesses a deep and broad set of skills and experiences that facilitate strong oversight and strategic direction for a leading global innovator in biotechnology. The following chart summarizes the competencies of each director nominee to be represented on our Board. The details of each directors competencies are included in each directors profile.
Experience / Skills Austin Bradway Druker Eckert Garland Hassan Henderson Holley Jacks Kullman Sugar Williams Healthcare Industry, Providers and Payers Science/Technology Public Company CEO/COO/CFO Regulatory Compliance Financial/Accounting Government/Public Policy International
The lack of a ✓ for a particular item does not mean that the director does not possess that qualification, characteristic, skill, or experience. Each of our Board members have experience and/or skills in the enumerated areas, however, the ✓ is designed to indicate that a director has particular strength in that area.
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 7
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE NAMED NOMINEES. PROXIES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
Set forth below is biographical information for each nominee and a summary of the specific qualifications, attributes, skills, and experiences which led our Board to conclude that each nominee should serve on the Board at this time. All of our directors meet the qualifications and skills of our Amgen Inc. Board of Directors Guidelines for Director Qualifications and Evaluations included in this proxy statement as Appendix A. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or among any of our directors and our executive officers.
Wanda M. Austin
Director since: 2017
Age: 64
Committees: Audit Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Other Public Company Boards: Chevron Corporation
|
Wanda M. Austin has served as a director of the Company since 2017. Dr. Austin was appointed Interim President of the University of Southern California in August 2018. She is the retired President and Chief Executive Officer of The Aerospace Corporation, a leading architect of the United States national security space programs, where she served from 2008 until her retirement in 2016. From 2004 to 2007, Dr. Austin was Senior Vice President, National Systems Group of The Aerospace Corporation. Dr. Austin joined The Aerospace Corporation in 1979 and served in various positions from 1979 until 2004.
Dr. Austin has served as an Adjunct Research Professor at the University of Southern Californias Viterbi School of Engineering since 2007. She is the co-founder of MakingSpace, Inc., where she serves as a motivational speaker on STEM education. Dr. Austin has been a director of Chevron Corporation, a petroleum, exploration, production and refining company, since 2016, serving on its Board Nominating and Governance Committee and chairing its Public Policy Committee. Dr. Austin is a trustee of the University of Southern California and previously served on the boards of directors of the National Geographic Society and the Space Foundation. Dr. Austin received an undergraduate degree from Franklin & Marshall College, a masters degree from the University of Pittsburgh, and a doctorate from the University of Southern California. She is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Austin should serve on the Board based on her leadership and management experience as a chief executive officer, her extensive background in science, technology, and government affairs in a highly regulated industry, and her public board experience. |
Robert A. Bradway
Director since: 2011
Age: 56
Committees: Equity Award Executive (Chair)
Other Public Company Boards: The Boeing Company
|
Robert A. Bradway has served as our director since 2011 and Chairman of the Board since 2013. Mr. Bradway has been our President since 2010 and Chief Executive Officer since 2012. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Bradway served as our Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Bradway joined Amgen in 2006 as Vice President, Operations Strategy and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2007 to 2010. Prior to joining Amgen, he was a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley in London where, beginning in 2001, he had responsibility for the firms banking department and corporate finance activities in Europe.
Mr. Bradway has been a director of The Boeing Company, an aerospace company and manufacturer of commercial airplanes, defense, space and securities systems, since 2016, serving on its Audit and Finance Committees. From 2011 to May 2017, Mr. Bradway was a director of Norfolk Southern Corporation, a transportation company. He has served on the board of trustees of the University of Southern California since 2014 and on the advisory board of the Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics at that university since 2012. Mr. Bradway holds a bachelors degree in biology from Amherst College and a masters degree in business administration from Harvard Business School.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Bradway should serve on the Board based on his thorough knowledge of all aspects of our business, combined with his leadership and management skills having previously served as our President and Chief Operating Officer and as our Chief Financial Officer. |
8 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Brian J. Druker
Director since: 2018
Age: 63
Committees: Audit Corporate Responsibility and Compliance
|
Brian J. Druker has served as a director of the Company since May 2018. Dr. Druker joined Oregon Health & Science University, or OHSU, in 1993 and is currently a physician-scientist and professor of medicine. Dr. Druker has served as the director of the OHSU Knight Cancer Institute since 2007, associate dean for oncology of the OHSU School of Medicine since 2010, and the JELD-WEN chair of leukemia research at OHSU since 2001. He has been an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, a nonprofit medical research organization, since 2002.
Dr. Druker has served on the scientific advisory boards of Aptose Biosciences Inc., a biotechnology company, since 2013, and Grail, Inc., a biotechnology company, since 2016. In 2011, he founded Blueprint Medicines Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company, and remains as a scientific advisor to this company. In 2006, he founded MolecularMD, a privately-held molecular diagnostics company.
Dr. Druker has received numerous awards, including the Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Research Award in 2009, the Japan Prize in Healthcare and Medical Technology in 2012, the Albany Medical Center Prize in 2013 (for influential work in the development of STI571 (Gleevec®) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia), and the Tang Prize in Biopharmaceutical Science in 2018. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 2012 as well as the National Academy of Medicine in 2007. Dr. Druker received both an undergraduate degree and his doctorate from the University of California, San Diego. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Druker should serve on the Board based on his extensive scientific research and expertise leading an important academic institution, conducting highly significant research in the area of oncology, and directly managing the care of cancer patients.
Robert A. Eckert
Lead Independent Director
Director since: 2012
Age: 64
Committees: Compensation and Management Development (Chair) Equity Award (Chair) Executive Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Levi Strauss & Co. McDonalds Corporation
|
Robert A. Eckert is our lead independent director. Mr. Eckert has been an Operating Partner at Friedman Fleischer & Lowe, a private equity firm, since 2014. Mr. Eckert was the Chief Executive Officer of Mattel, Inc., a toy design, manufacture and marketing company, having held this position from 2000 through 2011, and its Chairman of the Board from 2000 through 2012. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Kraft Foods Inc., a consumer packaged food and beverage company, from 1997 to 2000, Group Vice President from 1995 to 1997, President of the Oscar Mayer Foods Division from 1993 to 1995 and held various other senior executive and other positions from 1977 to 1992.
Mr. Eckert has been a director of McDonalds Corporation, a company which franchises and operates McDonalds restaurants in the global restaurant industry, since 2003, serving as the Chair of the Public Policy and Strategy Committee and a member of the Executive and Governance Committees. Mr. Eckert also has served as a director of Levi Strauss & Co., a jeans and casual wear manufacturer, since 2010, serving as Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship Committee. Levi Strauss & Co. was a privately-held company until March 2019 when it became publicly traded. Mr. Eckert was a director of Smart & Final Stores, Inc., a warehouse store, from 2013 until 2014 prior to it becoming a publicly-traded company. He was appointed director of Eyemart Express Holdings LLC, a privately-held eyewear retailer and portfolio company of Friedman Fleischer & Lowe, in 2015. Mr. Eckert is on the Global Advisory Board of the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and serves on the Eller College National Board of Advisors at the University of Arizona. Mr. Eckert received an undergraduate degree from the University of Arizona and a masters degree in business administration from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Eckert should serve on our Board because of Mr. Eckerts long-tenured experience as a chief executive officer of large public companies, his broad international experience in marketing and business development, and his valuable leadership experience.
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 9
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Greg C. Garland
Director since: 2013
Age: 61
Committees: Compensation and Management Development Equity Award Executive Governance and Nominating (Chair)
Other Public Company Boards: Phillips 66(1)
|
Greg C. Garland is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Phillips 66, an energy manufacturing and logistics company with midstream, chemical, refining and marketing and specialties businesses created through the repositioning of ConocoPhillips, having held this position since 2012. Mr. Garland chairs the Executive Committee of Phillips 66.(1) Prior to Phillips 66, Mr. Garland served as Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production, Americas of ConocoPhillips from 2010 to 2012. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company (now a joint venture between Phillips 66 and Chevron) from 2008 to 2010 and Senior Vice President, Planning and Specialty Chemicals from 2000 to 2008. Mr. Garland served in various positions at Phillips Petroleum Company from 1980 to 2000. Mr. Garland is a member of the Engineering Advisory Council for Texas A&M University. Mr. Garland received an undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Garland should serve on our Board because of Mr. Garlands experience as a chief executive officer and his over 30 years of international experience in a highly regulated industry.
|
(1) | Mr. Garland also serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Phillips 66 Partners LP, a master limited partnership and wholly-owned subsidiary of Phillips 66 without any employees. |
Fred Hassan
Director since: 2015
Age: 73
Committees: Audit Compensation and Management Development
Other Public Company Boards: Intrexon Corporation
Audit Committee financial expert |
Fred Hassan is Director at Warburg Pincus LLC, a global private equity investment institution, since 2018. Mr. Hassan was Special Limited Partner at Warburg Pincus LLC from 2017 to 2018 and Partner and Managing Director from 2011 to 2017 and, prior to that, served as Senior Advisor from 2009 to 2010. Mr. Hassan was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Schering-Plough Corporation from 2003 to 2009. Prior to this, Mr. Hassan was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia Corporation, from 2001 to 2003. Before assuming these roles, he had served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia Corporation from its creation in 2000 as a result of the merger of Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. with Monsanto Company. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. beginning in 1997. Mr. Hassan previously held senior positions with Wyeth (formerly known as American Home Products), including that of Executive Vice President with responsibility for its pharmaceutical and medical products businesses, and served as a member of the board from 1995 to 1997. Prior to that, Mr. Hassan held various roles at Sandoz Pharmaceuticals and headed its U.S. pharmaceuticals businesses.
Mr. Hassan has been a director of Intrexon Corporation, a synthetic biology company, since 2016, serving on its Compensation Committee. Mr. Hassan was a director of Time Warner Inc., a media company, from 2009 until its acquisition by AT&T Inc., a provider of communications and digital entertainment services, in 2018. Mr. Hassan was a director of Avon Products, Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of beauty and related products, from 1999 until 2013 and served on its Compensation and Management Development, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Audit Committees, as lead independent director from 2009 to 2012, and Chairman of the Board between January and April 2013. Mr. Hassan was Chairman of the Board of Bausch & Lomb, from 2010 until its acquisition by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, in 2013. Mr. Hassan served on the board of directors and Compensation and Audit Committees of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. from 2013 to 2014. Mr. Hassan received an undergraduate degree from Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London and a master's degree in business administration from Harvard Business School. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Hassan should serve on the Board based on his global experience as a public company chief executive officer, his particular knowledge and experience in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries, including overseeing businesses with significant research and development operations, his diversified financial and business expertise, as well as prior public company board experience. Given his financial and leadership experience, Mr. Hassan has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert by our Board.
10 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Rebecca M. Henderson
Director since: 2009
Age: 58
Committees: Audit Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Other Public Company Boards: IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
|
Rebecca M. Henderson has been the John and Natty McArthur University Professor at Harvard University since 2011. From 2009 to 2011, Dr. Henderson served as the Senator John Heinz Professor of Environmental Management at Harvard Business School. Prior to this, she was a professor of management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT, for 21 years, having been the Eastman Kodak LFM Professor of Management since 1999. Since 1995, she has also been a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. She specializes in technology strategy and the broader strategic problems faced by companies in high technology industries.
Dr. Henderson has been a director of IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., a company which provides diagnostic and information technology-based products and services for veterinary, food and water applications, since 2003, chairing its Finance Committee and serving on its Compensation Committee. Dr. Henderson has also served as a director of the Ember Corporation, a privately-held semiconductor chip manufacturer, and on its Compensation Committee, from 2001 to 2009. She has further been a director of Linbeck Construction Corporation, a privately-held facility solutions company, from 2000 until 2004. Dr. Henderson has published articles, papers and reviews in a range of scholarly journals. Dr. Henderson received an undergraduate degree from MIT and a doctorate from Harvard University.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Henderson should serve on the Board because Dr. Hendersons study of the complex strategy issues faced by high technology companies provides valuable insight into the Companys strategic and technology issues. |
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
Director since: 2017
Age: 62
Committees: Audit (Chair) Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Executive
Audit Committee financial expert
|
Charles M. Holley, Jr. is the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., or Walmart, where he served from 2010 to 2015 and as Executive Vice President between January 1, 2016 and January 31, 2016. Prior to this, Mr. Holley served as Executive Vice President, Finance and Treasurer of Walmart from 2007 to 2010. From 2005 to 2006, he served as Senior Vice President. Prior to that, Mr. Holley was Senior Vice President and Controller from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Holley served various roles in Wal-Mart International from 1994 through 2002. Prior to this, Mr. Holley served in various roles at Tandy Corporation. He spent more than ten years with Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Holley is an Independent Senior Advisor, U.S. CFO Program, at Deloitte LLP, a privately-held provider of audit, consulting, tax, and advisory services, since 2016.
Mr. Holley serves on the Advisory Council for the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Texas Presidents Development Board.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Holley should serve on the Board based on his experience as a chief financial officer of a global public company, his financial acumen, and his management and leadership skills. Given his financial and leadership experience, Mr. Holley has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert by our Board. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 11
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Tyler Jacks
Director since: 2012
Age: 58
Committees: Audit Compensation and Management Development
Other Public Company Boards: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
|
Tyler Jacks joined the faculty of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT, in 1992 and is currently the David H. Koch Professor of Biology and director of the David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, which brings together biologists and engineers to improve detection, diagnosis and treatment of cancer, a position he has held since 2007. Dr. Jacks has been an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, a nonprofit medical research organization, since 1994.
Dr. Jacks has been a director of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., a life sciences supply company, since 2009, serving on its Strategy and Finance Committee and scientific advisory board and chairing its Science and Technology Committee. In 2006, he co-founded T2 Biosystems, Inc., a biotechnology company, and served on its scientific advisory board until 2013. Dr. Jacks has served on the scientific advisory board of SQZ Biotech, a privately-held biotechnology company, since 2015. Dr. Jacks served on the scientific advisory board of Aveo Pharmaceuticals Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from 2001 until 2013. In 2015, Dr. Jacks founded Dragonfly Therapeutics, Inc., a privately-held biopharmaceutical company, and serves as Chair of its scientific advisory board. He was appointed to the National Cancer Advisory Board, which advises and assists the Director of the National Cancer Institute with respect to the National Cancer Program, in 2011 and served as Chair until 2016. In 2016, Dr. Jacks was named to a blue ribbon panel of scientists and advisors established as a working group of the National Cancer Advisory Board and served as co-Chair advising the Cancer MoonshotSM Task Force. Dr. Jacks was a director of MITs Center for Cancer Research from 2001 to 2007 and received numerous awards including the Paul Marks Prize for Cancer Research and the American Association for Cancer Research Award for Outstanding Achievement. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences as well as the National Academy of Medicine in 2009 and received the MIT Killian Faculty Achievement Award in 2015. Dr. Jacks received an undergraduate degree from Harvard University and his doctorate from the University of California, San Francisco. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Jacks should serve on the Board based on his extensive scientific expertise relevant to our industry, including his broad experience as a cancer researcher, pioneering uses of technology to study cancer-associated genes, and service on several scientific advisory boards and membership in the National Cancer Advisory Board.
Ellen J. Kullman
Director since: 2016
Age: 63
Committees: Audit Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Dell Technologies Inc. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. United Technologies Corporation
Audit Committee financial expert
|
Ellen J. Kullman is the former President, Chair and Chief Executive Officer of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, or DuPont, a science and technology-based company, where she served from 2009 to 2015. Prior to this, Ms. Kullman served as President of DuPont from 2008 to 2009. From 2006 through 2008, she served as Executive Vice President of DuPont. Prior to that, Ms. Kullman was Group Vice President, DuPont Safety and Protection. Ms. Kullman has been a director of United Technologies Corporation, a technology products and services company, since 2011, and lead director since 2018, serving on its Compensation, Finance and Executive Committees. Ms. Kullman has been a director of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., an investment banking firm, since 2016, serving on its Compensation, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Risk Committees. Ms. Kullman has been a director of Dell Technologies Inc., a technology company, since 2016, serving on its Audit and Capital Stock Committees. Dell Technologies was a privately-held company until December 2018 when it became publicly traded. Ms. Kullman served as a director of General Motors, from 2004 to 2008, serving on its Audit Committee.
Ms. Kullman has also served as a director of Carbon3D, Inc., a privately-held 3D printing company, since 2016. Ms. Kullman has served on the Board of Trustees of Northwestern University since 2016 and on the Board of Overseers of Tufts University School of Engineering since 2006. She served as Chair of the US-China Business Council from 2013 to 2015. In 2016, Ms. Kullman joined the Temasek Americas Advisory Panel of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, a privately-held investment company based in Singapore. Ms. Kullman received a bachelor of science in mechanical engineering degree from Tufts University and a masters degree from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Ms. Kullman should serve on the Board based on her lengthy global experience as a public company chief executive officer and board chair, her management and leadership skills, and her experience with scientific operations, all of which provide valuable insight into the operations of our Company. Given her leadership and financial experience, Ms. Kullman has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert by our Board.
12 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Ronald D. Sugar
Director since: 2010
Age: 70
Committees: Corporate Responsibility and Compliance (Chair) Executive Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Air Lease Corporation Apple Inc. Chevron Corporation
|
Ronald D. Sugar is the retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Northrop Grumman Corporation, a global aerospace and defense company, having held these posts from 2003 through 2009.
Dr. Sugar has been a director of Chevron Corporation, a petroleum, exploration, production and refining company, since 2005, serving as the lead director and on the Management Compensation Committee and chairing the Board Nominating and Governance Committee. Dr. Sugar has been a director of Apple Inc., a manufacturer and seller of, among other things, personal computers, mobile communication and media devices, since 2010, chairing the Audit and Finance Committee. Dr. Sugar has been a director of Air Lease Corporation, an aircraft leasing company, since 2010, chairing the Compensation Committee and serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Since 2010, he has been a senior advisor to Ares Management LLC, a privately-held asset manager and registered investment advisor. In 2014, Dr. Sugar joined the Temasek Americas Advisory Panel of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, a privately-held investment company based in Singapore. Dr. Sugar is a member of the National Academy of Engineering, trustee of the University of Southern California, member of the UCLA Anderson School of Management Board of Visitors, and director of the Los Angeles Philharmonic Association.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Sugar should serve on our Board because of Dr. Sugars board and senior executive-level expertise, including his experience as chief executive officer and board chair of a large, highly regulated, public company and his insight in the areas of operations, government affairs, science, technology and finance. |
R. Sanders Williams
Director since: 2014
Age: 70
Committees: Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
|
R. Sanders Williams is the President Emeritus of Gladstone Institutes, a non-profit biomedical research enterprise, having served in this position since 2018, and was the Chief Executive Officer of Gladstone Foundation, a not-for-profit organization supporting the Gladstone Institutes during 2018. Dr. Williams has been a Professor of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco since 2010, and Professor of Medicine at Duke University since 2018. Dr. Williams was both President of Gladstone Institutes and its Robert W. and Linda L. Mahley Distinguished Professor of Medicine, from 2010 to 2017. Prior to this, Dr. Williams served as Senior Vice Chancellor of the Duke University School of Medicine from 2008 to 2010 and Dean of the Duke University School of Medicine from 2001 to 2008. He was the founding Dean of the Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, from 2003 to 2008 and served on its Governing Board from 2003 to 2010. From 1990 to 2001, Dr. Williams was Chief of Cardiology and Director of the Ryburn Center for Molecular Cardiology at the University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center.
Dr. Williams has been a director of the Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, a diagnostic technologies company, since 2007, serving on the Audit Committee and chairing the Quality and Compliance Committee. Dr. Williams was a director of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a pharmaceutical company, from 2006 until 2013. Dr. Williams has served on the board of directors of the Gladstone Foundation, a non-profit institution that is distinct from Gladstone Institutes, since 2012 and on the board of directors of Exploratorium, a non-profit science museum and learning center located in San Francisco, from 2011 to 2018. Dr. Williams was elected to the National Academy of Medicine in 2002. Dr. Williams received his undergraduate degree from Princeton University and his doctorate from Duke University. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Williams should serve on the Board because of his broad medical and scientific background, including his leadership roles in domestic and academic science settings, his deep experience in cardiology, oversight of governance of multi-hospital healthcare provider systems, leadership and development of international medical programs in Asia, and prior industry board experience.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE ABOVE 12 NAMED NOMINEES.
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 13
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
The Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process. The Board discusses enterprise risks with our senior management on a regular basis, including as a part of its annual strategic planning process, annual budget review and approval, capital plan review and approval, and through reviews of compliance issues in the applicable committees of our Board, as appropriate. At each regular meeting, or more frequently as needed, the Board receives and considers reports from each of the committees set forth below, which reports may provide additional detail on risk management issues and managements response. Important categories of risk are assigned to appropriate Board committees that report back to the full Board:
Committee
|
Primary Risk Oversight Responsibility
|
|||
Governance and Nominating |
Oversees the assessment of each member of the Boards independence, as well as the effectiveness of our Corporate Governance Principles and Board of Directors Code of Conduct. Also oversees Board and committee evaluations and Board succession.
|
|||
Audit |
Oversees financial risk, such as capital risk, tax risk, financial compliance risk and internal controls over financial reporting, and oversees internal audit and independent registered public accountants.
|
|||
Compensation and Management Development |
Evaluates whether the right management talent is in place and oversees succession planning. Also oversees our compensation policies and practices and incentive program administration and design, including whether such policies, practices, and incentive programs balance risk-taking and rewards in an appropriate manner as discussed further below, align with stockholders interests, and are consistent with emerging best practices.
|
|||
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance |
Oversees non-financial compliance risk, such as regulatory risks associated with the requirements of the Federal health care program, Food and Drug Administration, and risks associated with pricing and access, information security, including cybersecurity, and our reputation. Also oversees staff member compliance with the Code of Conduct.
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 17
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Process for Selecting Directors, Director Qualifications, and Board Diversity
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 19
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Continuous Board Refreshment
The Board, led by the Governance Committee, has an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and selecting directors.
Independent Search Firms Stockholders Independent Directors Candidate Pool Sourced, Maintained, and Updated Consider Guidelines for Director Qualifications and Evaluations (Appendix A) Consider skills matrix Consider diversity Review independence and potential conflicts Meet candidates Select Directors 5 new directors since 2015 Recommend Candidates to the Board Review by full Board
Regular Board and Committee Evaluations
Our Governance Committee leads an annual evaluation process of the Board and its committees. The Board and the Audit, Compensation, Compliance, and Governance Committees each complete an annual assessment focusing on their roles, effectiveness, and fulfillment of fiduciary duties.
1. Commence Annual Anonymous Evaluations Formal annual anonymous evaluations of the full Board as well as the Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees are compiled and distributed Overseen by the Governance Committee 2. Evaluation and Assessment Directors provide feedback regarding Board and applicable committee: Composition and structure Role and effectiveness Fulfillment of fiduciary duties Meetings and materials Interaction with management 3. Review The lead independent director speaks with each member of the Board for one-on-one discussions Each committee and the full Board conduct separate discussions in executive session 4. Incorporation of Feedback Follow-up items are addressed at subsequent Board and committee meetings
20 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Governance Committee Processes and Procedures for Considering and Determining Director Compensation
Current Members: Charles M. Holley, Jr.* (Chair) Wanda M. Austin Brian J. Druker (since May 2018) Fred Hassan* Rebecca M. Henderson Frank C. Herringer* Tyler Jacks Ellen J. Kullman*
*Audit Committee financial expert
Others Who Served in 2018: François de Carbonnel (until retirement at 2018 Annual Meeting)
Number of Meetings Held in 2018: 10
Each member has been determined by the Board to be independent under The NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and the requirements of the SEC, including the requirements regarding financial literacy and sophistication.
|
Description and Key Responsibilities:
Oversees our accounting and financial reporting process and the audits of the financial statements, as required by NASDAQ.
Assists the Board in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities with respect to the oversight of our financial accounting and reporting, the underlying internal controls and procedures over financial reporting, and the audits of the financial statements.
Has sole authority for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accountants.
Reviews and discusses, prior to filing or issuance, with management and the independent registered public accountants (when appropriate) our audited consolidated financial statements to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and earnings press releases.
Approves all related party transactions, as required by NASDAQ.
| |||||||
Oversight of the Independent Registered Public Accountants The Audit Committee: Auditor Selection. Evaluates the qualifications and performance of our independent registered public accountants each year and determines whether to re-engage the current independent registered public accountants. Audit Partner Selection. Directly involved in the selection of the lead engagement partner through an interview process. Audit Firm Evaluation. Considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided, the independent registered public accountants technical expertise and knowledge of our operations and industry. Audit Services. Pre-approves services.
|
||||||||
22 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 23
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures for Considering and Determining Executive Compensation in 2018
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 25
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
2018 Executive Compensation Was Aligned With Our Strategy and Performance
As discussed more fully in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis starting on page 33, a significant majority of each NEOs compensation is at-risk and dependent on our performance and execution of our strategic priorities.
LTI Equity Award Allocation | 2018 Total Target Direct Compensation Mix | |
|
2018 Performance Against Pre-Established Goals and Measures
2018 Annual Cash Incentive Program
|
2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Performance Program
| |||||||
Goal
|
Weighting
|
% of Target Earned
|
||||||
Financial Performance
| ||||||||
Revenues
|
|
30%
|
|
224.7%
| ||||
Non-GAAP Net Income(1)
|
|
30%
|
|
186.5%
| ||||
Progress Innovative Pipeline
| ||||||||
Advance Early Pipeline
|
|
5%
|
|
113.9%
| ||||
Execute Key Clinical Studies and Regulatory Filings
|
|
20%
|
|
120.8%
| ||||
Deliver Annual Priorities
| ||||||||
Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives
|
|
10%
|
|
71.3%
| ||||
Achieve Transformation Objectives
|
|
5%
|
|
124.2%
| ||||
Final Score
|
|
Achieved 166.6%
|
* | Mr. Gordon and Dr. Reese are not included in the pie chart because they commenced their roles as executive officers of our Company on September 3, 2018, and July 26, 2018, respectively. |
(1) | Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or non-GAAP, net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
(2) | The operating measures of the 2016-2018 performance units were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 29
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
2018 Alignment of Pay with Performance
Our strategy includes a series of integrated activities to strengthen our long-term competitive position in the industry. Key 2018 activities that align our NEO pay with performance and support the execution of our strategic priorities are summarized below.
We delivered strong financial performance.
| Revenues were $23.7 billion in 2018, an increase of 4% from 2017, driven primarily by product sales growth. |
| Our non-GAAP net income(1) grew 4% to $9.6 billion in 2018. |
| We realized benefits from ongoing transformation initiatives along with increased investment in both research and development and our launch products. |
| We delivered a one-year total shareholder return of 15% and a five-year return of 93%, outperforming our peer group and the Standard & Poors 500 Index over both time periods. |
Total Shareholder Return
| Our quarterly 2018 dividend of $1.32 per share represented a 15 percent increase from the quarterly dividend for 2017. |
| During 2018, we repurchased $17.9 billion of our Common Stock and paid dividends totaling $3.5 billion, resulting in our returning a total of $21.4 billion of capital to our stockholders through stock repurchases and dividends. |
We progressed our pipeline.
We develop innovative and biosimilar medicines that address unmet medical needs to treat serious illnesses. In 2018, we launched two innovative products, two biosimilars, and generated a significant number of innovative and first-in-class molecules in our portfolio.
We launched four medicines in 2018.
v | Innovative Medicines Launched. We launched two important innovative products in 2018 in the U.S. in two different therapeutic areas: |
|
Aimovig® (migraine), the first calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. Migraine is a debilitating condition that continues to have a significant lasting impact on the lives of patients and society at large. In 2018, we served more than 150,000 patients with Aimovig. |
(1) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
30 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
|
Parsabiv® (nephrology), our medicine for secondary hyperparathyroidism. Parsabiv, which is administered along with dialysis, delivers clinical benefits to patients by putting control in the hands of the health care provider. |
v | Biosimilars Launched. We also launched two important biosimilars outside the U.S. in 2018: |
| KANJINTI (biosimilar trastuzumab (Herceptin®)) launched in Europe for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, HER2-positive early breast cancer, and HER2-positive metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. |
| AMGEVITA (biosimilar adalimumab (HUMIRA®)) launched in Europe for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, including moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, severe active ankylosing spondylitis, moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis, moderate-to-severe Crohns disease, and moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. |
We advanced our early pipeline with approximately 20 unique oncology assets in development.
| We initiated 10 first-in-human studies, including for small-cell lung cancer, obesity, glioblastoma, relapsed/refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, multiple myeloma, acute myeloid leukemia, non-hodgkins lymphoma, and cardiovascular disease. |
| In the oncology pipeline, we are advancing approximately 20 early-stage product candidates in therapeutic indications ranging from solid tumors (including small-cell lung cancer) and hematological malignancies (including multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia). We have designed these development programs to rapidly establish proof-of-concepts and generate data to support our move into the pivotal phase so that we may get these innovative therapies to patients as quickly as possible. |
We executed key clinical studies and regulatory filings.
v | Innovative Portfolio Developments. We executed key clinical studies and regulatory filings for KYPROLIS®, XGEVA®, BLINCYTO®, and Nplate® in oncology, for Repatha® in cardiovascular disease, for tezepelumab(1) in inflammatory disease, and for Prolia® and EVENITY(2)* in bone health. |
v | Biosimilar Portfolio Developments. In our biosimilars portfolio, MVASI(3) (biosimilar bevacizumab (Avastin®)) was approved in Europe, we submitted applications in the U.S. and Europe for ABP 710 (biosimilar infliximab (REMICADE®)), and ABP 798(3) (biosimilar rituximab (RITUXAN®)) met its primary endpoint in our Phase 1/Phase 3 study. |
We delivered on our annual priorities to execute critical launches and long-term commercial objectives.
Revenue growth (4%) benefited from double-digit, volume-driven sales growth from a number of our innovative medicines that address unmet medical needs to treat serious illnesses, including Repatha in cardiovascular disease, Prolia in osteoporosis, and KYPROLIS in cancer.
We realized our 2014-2018 commitments to investors and our transformation objectives.
2018 was the capstone year for a set of ambitious non-GAAP financial commitments we made to our stockholders five years ago, including earnings per share growth, operating margin improvement, and return of capital that we met and exceeded through significant transformation and process improvement efforts. The benefits of our transformation continues in the productivity capabilities we have embedded into our business to reallocate resources to our pipeline and growth opportunities, putting us in a better position to serve patients and deliver long-term growth.
We invested for long-term growth while returning substantial capital to our stockholders.
| In 2018, we invested $3.7 billion in research and development and $738 million in capital expenditures. |
| Between 2011 and 2018, we have increased our global presence to approximately 100 countries from 50. |
| Next-generation biomanufacturing plants require a smaller manufacturing footprint and offer greater environmental benefits, including reduced consumption of water and energy and lower levels of carbon emissions. In 2018, we successfully operated our next-generation manufacturing facility in Singapore and broke ground on a next-generation biomanufacturing plant in Rhode Island. This new plant will be the first of its kind in the U.S. and will use our proven next-generation biomanufacturing capabilities to manufacture our products while maintaining a reliable, high-quality, compliant supply of medicines to continue our commitment to meet the need of every patient every time. |
(1) | Jointly developed in collaboration with AstraZeneca plc. |
(2) | Jointly developed in collaboration with UCB. *Trade name provisionally approved in U.S. |
(3) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Allergan plc. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 31
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
Positive 2018 Say on Pay Vote Outcome and Engagement With Our Stockholders
Board Recommends a Vote FOR Our Executive Compensation
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANYS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
32 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Table of Contents
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 33
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our compensation strategy, philosophy, policies, programs, and practices, or compensation program, for our Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, and the positions they held in 2018 below.
Name | Title | |
Robert A. Bradway |
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President | |
Anthony C. Hooper |
Former Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Operations (through September 3, 2018) | |
Murdo Gordon |
Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Operations | |
Sean E. Harper |
Former Executive Vice President, Research and Development (through July 26, 2018) | |
David W. Meline |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
David M. Reese |
Executive Vice President, Research and Development | |
Jonathan P. Graham |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Planned Succession Executive Officer Changes in 2018
34 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Our strategy includes a series of integrated activities to strengthen our long-term competitive position in the industry. Select 2018 activities that support the execution of our strategic priorities and align our NEO pay with performance are summarized below and discussed further in the following pages.
Our Strategic Priorities
Select 2018 Activities | Description | |||||||||||
Innovative Medicines |
Launched: Aimovig®(1) (migraine) Parsabiv® (nephrology) Progressed pipeline: 10 investigational 10 first-in-human studies
|
Our research and development strategy is aimed at advancing differentiated, best-in-class or first-in-class molecules that deliver large effect sizes against serious illnesses. Our focus on developing innovative, breakaway medicines to address important unmet needs guides how we allocate resources across internal and external program possibilities. This results in a productive balance of internal development and external programs and collaborations reflected in our current product portfolio and pipeline.
|
||||||||||
Branded Biosimilars |
Launched: KANJINTI AMGEVITA 3 biosimilars in Phase 3 |
We believe our deep experience in biologics development and unparalleled capabilities in biotechnology manufacturing make the emerging biosimilars market attractive and position us for leadership. |
||||||||||
Transforming Amgen for the Future |
Met and exceeded 2014-2018 Embedded productivity |
We have improved our business and operating model through significant transformation and process improvement efforts. We have driven research and development efficiency through productivity initiatives. Among these programs, we reduced our development cycle time by an average of approximately 36 months, reduced the time it takes to bring new medicines to market, reengineered internal processes to make them more efficient, and explored new technologies with the potential to further enhance the value we deliver to patients. Further, the benefits of our transformation continue in the productivity capabilities we have embedded in our business to reallocate resources to our pipeline and growth opportunities.
|
||||||||||
Capital Allocation and Investing for Long-Term Growth |
$17.9B in stock repurchases $3.5B of dividends 15% per share dividend |
We recognize that stockholders who support investment in developing innovative medicines require an appropriate return on the capital they commit to Amgen. In 2018, we returned $21.4 billion in capital to our stockholders, consisting of $17.9 billion in stock repurchases and $3.5 billion of dividends. |
||||||||||
Global Geographic Reach |
Presence in ~100 countries |
We are leveraging our global presence to deliver the potential of our products to patients globally. Amgen medicines are now available to patients in approximately 100 countries worldwide.
|
||||||||||
Next-Generation Biomanufacturing | Broke ground on
U.S. |
Next-generation biomanufacturing plants, such as our Singapore facility licensed in 2017, require a smaller manufacturing footprint and offer greater environmental benefits, including reduced consumption of water and energy and lower levels of carbon emissions. Our new plant being built in Rhode Island will be the first of its kind in the U.S. and will use these proven next-generation biomanufacturing capabilities. |
||||||||||
Improved Drug Delivery Systems | Invested in delivery devices to enhance patient experience, including our SureClick® autoinjector
|
Biologic medicines are, for the most part, injected subcutaneously or administered intravenously. Innovations that make the delivery of our medicines easier and less costly are good for patients and have positive economic benefits to the healthcare system. They also offer important opportunities for differentiation and contribute to our life cycle management strategies for our mature brands.
|
(1) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Novartis AG. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 35
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Aligning Pay With Performance and Execution of Our Strategic Priorities
(1) | Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or non-GAAP, net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
36 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | U.S. Food and Drug Administration. |
(2) | RandomizEd, OpeN Label, Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib Plus DExamethAsone Vs Bortezomib Plus DexamethasOne in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. |
(3) | CArfilzomib, Lenaldidomide, and DexamethaSone versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for the treatment of PatIents with Relapsed Multiple MyEloma. |
(4) | New Drug Application. |
(5) | Developed in Japan by Amgen Astellas BioPharma K.K., our joint venture with Astellas Pharma Inc. |
(6) | Biologics License Application. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 37
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | Jointly developed in collaboration with AstraZeneca plc. |
(2) | Jointly developed in collaboration with UCB. Developed in Japan by Amgen Astellas BioPharma K.K., our joint venture with Astellas Pharma Inc. *Trade name provisionally approved in U.S. |
(3) | European Medicines Agency. |
(4) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Allergan plc. |
38 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 39
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Final 2016-2018 Performance Period Calculation 2016-2018 Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures EPS Growth (1/3rd) Operating Margin (1/3rd) Operating Expense (1/3rd) 115.4% 2016-2018 Amgen Relative TSR Performance 30.3% Final Payout 145.7%
(1) | The operating measures of the 2016-2018 performance units were based on Non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
40 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Our 2018 Compensation Program Highlights and Objectives
Total Target Direct Compensation Focuses on At Risk Compensation (90% for our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and 83% for our other NEOs) |
2018 Total Target Direct Compensation Mix 76% 14% 10% 90% At Risk CEO 90% pay at risk 75% performance based 17% 17% 66% 83% At Risk other NEOs* 83% pay at risk 69% performance based Purpose LTI Equity Awards Provide a direct link to the creation of stockholder value and execution on our strategy Align NEO's interests with stockholders Foster long-term focus and retention Annual Cash Incentives Measure NEO's performance against pre-established Company performance goals Align all staff members around the same Company performance goals as all such annual cash incentive awards are based on these goals Motivate NEOs to meet or exceed our Company performance goals to drive annual performance and position us for longer-term success via our strategy Base Salary Provides a degree of financial certainty that helps us retain talent Recognizes competitive market conditions and/or rewards individual performance through periodic increases LTI Equity Award Allocation: 80% Performance Based 50% Performance Units 30% Stock Options 20% Restricted Stock Units All preceding pie charts are calculated using (i) the "Salary" column from the "Summary Compensation Table" in our Executive Compensation Tables (ii) the target annual cash incentive cash incentive award in the "Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards - Target" column in the table in footnote 3 to the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards" table in our Executive Compensation Tables and (iii) the grant date fair value of annual grants of performance units, restricted stock units, or RSUs and stock options in the "Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards" column of the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards" table in our Executive Compensation Tables.
* | Mr. Gordon and Dr. Reese are not included in the pie chart because they commenced their roles as executive officers of our Company on September 3, 2018, and July 26, 2018, respectively. |
42 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
LTI Equity Awards (At Risk)
| Performance Units (50%). Performance units are rights to earn shares of our Common Stock based on pre-established performance goals achieved over a performance period of generally three years. The Compensation Committee establishes the performance award goal design at the beginning of each three-year period of the performance award program. The number of performance units earned is determined by our performance as measured against the pre-established performance goals at the end of the performance period. There is no guarantee of any value realized from the grants as they are earned only if specific long-term performance goals are achieved. |
| Stock Options (30%). Aligned with stockholder interests as they only have value if the Companys stock price increases after grant. |
| Restricted Stock Units (20%). Designed to encourage retention and long-term value creation. |
| Stock options and RSUs generally vest over four years in three approximately equal installments on the second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The delay in the commencement of vesting further emphasizes the long-term performance focus of our LTI equity award program and enhances retention. |
Performance Units Earned for the 2016-2018 Performance Period
The performance units for the 2016-2018 performance period were earned based on the Companys performance on three pre-established equally weighted annual non-GAAP operating measures(1) (EPS growth, operating margin, and operating expense) as measured against the pre-established targets for each of the three years. At the end of this performance period, the operating measures were averaged resulting in the total operating measures score of 115.4%. This score was then modified based on our three-year TSR performance of +30.3% (at the 65.2% percentile relative to the TSRs of the companies in the S&P 500 for this performance period)(2). These calculations resulted in a payout of 145.7% of target performance units granted.
|
Annual Cash Incentive Awards (At Risk and Designed to Drive Execution of Our Strategic Priorities)
Our Compensation Committee annually approves Company performance goals that are designed to focus our staff on delivering on our financial performance and operational objectives and to support our strategic priorities to drive annual performance and position us to execute on our strategy in the near- and longer-term. Our Executive Incentive Plan, or EIP, establishes a maximum award possible for each participant and annual cash incentive awards are made to our NEOs using the Compensation Committees negative discretion under the EIP generally based on the Companys performance against the pre-established Company performance goals. |
Our annual cash incentive awards are earned based on achieving financial performance, operational objectives that drive near- and long-term growth, stockholder value, and support our strategy. In 2018, we established annual Company performance goals that also serve to support our longer-term strategy. These performance goals are composed of revenues (30%), non-GAAP net income(3) (30%), and a number of operational measures supporting Progress Innovative Pipeline (25%) (composed of Advance Early Pipeline (5%) and Execute Key Clinical Studies and Regulatory Filings (20%)) and Deliver Annual Priorities (15%) (composed of Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives (10%) and Achieve Transformation Objectives (5%)). Based on our overall performance in 2018 compared to these pre-established Company performance goals, we paid annual cash incentive awards at 166.6% of target bonus opportunity.
|
Base Salaries (the smallest component of compensation for our NEOs)
| Based on data provided to the Compensation Committee, including recommendations of Frederic W. Cook & Co., or FW Cook, the Compensation Committees independent consultant, the Compensation Committee provided no base salary increases to its NEOs in 2018 consistent with our market positioning and reflective of our continued exercise of financial discipline. |
(1) | The operating measures of the 2016-2018 performance units were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
(2) | Based on our average daily closing price of a share of our Common Stock for the first 20 trading days beginning on the grant date (May 3, 2016) and last 20 trading days of the performance period. |
(3) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 43
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
How Compensation Decisions Are Made For Our Named Executive Officers
Roles and Responsibilities
Compensation Committee Composed solely of independent directors and reports to the Board
|
Evaluates the performance of our CEO within the context of the financial and operational performance of the Company.
Determines and approves compensation packages for our CEO, other NEOs, Executive Vice Presidents, Senior Vice Presidents, and Section 16 officers (collectively, Senior Management).
Reviews and approves all compensation programs in which our NEOs participate.
Oversees the development and effective succession planning of our CEO and other members of Senior Management annually.
Exercises the sole authority to select, retain, replace, and/or obtain advice from compensation consultants, legal counsel, and other outside advisors and assesses the independence of each such advisor, taking into consideration the factors set forth in the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules and The NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards.
Oversees the Boards relationship with and response to stockholders on executive compensation matters and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
|
Consultant to the Compensation Committee Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., Independent consultant retained directly by the Compensation Committee
|
Regularly attends Compensation Committee meetings, including meeting in executive session with the Compensation Committee.
Provides advice and studies on the appropriateness and competitiveness of our compensation program relative to market practice for our NEO compensation.
Provides advice and studies on our equity programs.
Provides advice on the selection of our peer group.
Consults on executive compensation trends and developments.
Consults and makes recommendations, when requested, on various compensation matters and compensation program designs and practices to support our business strategy and objectives.
Coordinates and reviews the appropriateness of market data compiled by management.
Works with management to assess the potential risks arising from our compensation policies and practices.
|
CEO Assisted by the Senior Vice President, Human Resources and other Company staff members |
Conducts performance reviews of the other NEOs and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to compensation of Senior Management other than himself.
Provides recommendations on the development of and succession planning for the members of Senior Management other than himself.
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 45
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
46 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
How We Establish Our Peer Group
2018 Peer Group Companies Biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies with which we compete for executive talent. | ||||
Objective Criteria Considered
|
2018 Peer Group (Companies in blue also list Amgen as a peer)
| |||
GICS codes of biotechnology (352010) and pharmaceuticals (352020);
12-month average market capitalization between 0.25 and 4.0x that of Amgens average market capitalization for the same period(1);
Trailing four-quarter revenues between 0.25 and 4.0x that of Amgens revenues(1);
Non-U.S. peers limited to those commonly identified as a peer of peers;
Competitors for executive talent;
Companies of comparable scope and complexity;
Competitors for equity investor capital;
Companies that identify us as their direct peer; and
Companies with similar pay practices. |
AbbVie Inc.
Allergan plc
AstraZeneca plc
Biogen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Celgene Corporation
Eli Lilly and Company
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
GlaxoSmithKline plc
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co., Inc.
Novartis AG
Pfizer Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Roche Holding AG
Sanofi S.A. |
(1) | For purposes of the 2018 peer group analyses: |
Market Capitalization(a) | 2017 Revenues(b) | |||||
Amgen |
$127 billion |
|
$23 billion |
| ||
Relative Peer Group Position |
3rd Quartile (above median) |
|
2nd Quartile |
|
(a) | Represents the 12-month average market capitalization as of May 31, 2018. |
(b) | Represents revenues for the trailing four quarters ended March 31, 2018. Revenues for GlaxoSmithKline plc, Roche Holding AG, and Sanofi S.A. were converted into U.S. dollars using Standard & Poors Capital IQ. |
The Market Median is determined for our CEO and our other NEOs based on the prior years compensation and is reviewed by the Compensation Committee to inform compensation decisions made in March of each year as follows:
Market Median
|
| |||||
CEO (compiled by FW Cook)
|
Other NEOs
|
|||||
50th percentile of each compensation element paid to CEOs in our peer group in the previous year from proxy statements. |
Average of the 50th percentile of each compensation element of our peer group from the PHRA Survey and proxy statements in the previous year (with base pay data aged forward to the current year).
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 47
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Value of 2018 Long-Term Incentive Equity Awards
Based on a review of Company and executive performance and market data, the Compensation Committee determined to grant the following LTI equity award grant values to our CEO and the other NEOs in March 2018, with an effective grant date of April 27, 2018, the third business day after the announcement of our first quarter 2018 earnings results (with the exception of Mr. Gordon who joined the Company in September 2018). (For more information regarding the determination of the Market Median, see How Compensation Decisions Are Made For Our Named Executive OfficersPeer Group Data Sources previously discussed.)
Named Executive Officer |
Performance Units(1) ($) |
Stock Options ($) |
Restricted Stock Units ($) |
Total Equity Value Granted ($) |
2017 Market Median ($) |
Difference vs. Market Median Over/ (Under) (%) |
||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
6,250,000 | 3,750,000 | 2,500,000 | 12,500,000 | 11,000,000 | 13.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
2,000,000 | 1,200,000 | 800,000 | 4,000,000 | 3,993,938 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Murdo Gordon(2) |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Sean E. Harper |
2,000,000 | 1,200,000 | 800,000 | 4,000,000 | 3,740,699 | 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
David W. Meline |
2,000,000 | 1,200,000 | 800,000 | 4,000,000 | 3,555,907 | 12.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
David M. Reese(3) |
450,000 | 270,000 | 180,000 | 900,000 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
1,400,000 | 840,000 | 560,000 | 2,800,000 | 2,583,298 | 8.4 |
(1) | The 2018-2020 performance period runs from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. |
(2) | Mr. Gordon commenced employment with the Company effective September 3, 2018. For a description of the new-hire LTI equity awards granted to Mr. Gordon in connection with the commencement of his employment, see the subsection Initial Hire and Promotion Equity Awards below. |
(3) | Dr. Reese was appointed as Executive Vice President, Research and Development, effective July 26, 2018. Prior to that date, and at the time that the 2018 annual LTI equity awards were granted, Dr. Reese served as Senior Vice President, Translational Sciences and Oncology and the grant amounts reflect his level as a Senior Vice President. A Market Median was not available for this position. The table excludes the promotional RSU award with a cash value of $2,400,000 granted on November 2, 2018. See the subsection Initial Hire and Promotion Equity Awards below for more details. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 49
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | The operating measures for the 2016-2018 performance units were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
50 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2016-2018 Performance Period Goal Design and Award Calculation
All operating measures were established in early 2016 at the
beginning of the three-year performance period
2018 Operating Measures and Performance
Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures |
Minimum (50%) |
Target (100%) |
Intermediate (125%) |
Maximum (150%) |
2018 Performance | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EPS Growth ($) |
142.9% ($14.37) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£$11.15 |
$12.25 |
$13.80 |
³$14.60 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Margin (%) |
106.6% (52.5%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£48% |
52% |
54% |
³58% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expense (in billions) |
50.0% ($11.91B) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
³$11.5B |
$10.9B |
|
£$10.3B |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
99.8%
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Final 2016-2018 Performance Period Calculation 2016-2018 Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures EPS Growth (1/3rd) Operating Margin (1/3rd) Operating Expense (1/3rd) 115.4% 2016-2018 Amgen Relative TSR Performance 30.3% Final Payout 145.7%
(1) | The operating measures of the 2016-2018 performance goals were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
(2) | Our targets for our 2016 and 2017 performance under the 2016-2018 performance goals were disclosed in our 2018 proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2018. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 51
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Performance Units Earned for 2016-2018 Performance Period
Our actual performance of 145.7% for the 2016-2018 performance period resulted in the following number of shares of Common Stock being earned under our performance award program for this performance period. Each earned performance unit converted to one share of Common Stock upon the payout date of March 22, 2019.
Named Executive Officer |
Performance Units Value Granted (Target) ($) |
Number of Performance Units Granted (#) |
Number of Shares of our Common (#) |
|||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
5,500,000 | 32,246 | 50,962 | |||||||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
2,000,000 | 11,726 | 18,532 | |||||||||
Murdo Gordon(2) |
n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||
Sean E. Harper |
1,750,000 | 10,260 | 16,215 | |||||||||
David W. Meline |
1,750,000 | 10,260 | 16,215 | |||||||||
David M. Reese |
400,000 | 2,345 | 3,706 | |||||||||
Jonathan P. Graham | 1,150,000 | 6,742 | 10,655 |
(1) | Includes dividend equivalents earned on these amounts rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares (excluding fractional shares paid in cash). |
(2) | Mr. Gordon commenced employment with the Company after the participants for the 2016-2018 performance period had been determined and, as such, he did not receive any performance units for the 2016-2018 performance period. For a description of the new-hire LTI equity awards granted to Mr. Gordon in connection with the commencement of his employment, see the subsection Initial Hire and Promotion Equity Awards above. |
52 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2017-2019 Performance Period Goal Design and Award Calculation
All operating measures were established in early 2017 at the
beginning of the three-year performance period
2018 Operating Measures and Performance
Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures |
Minimum (50%) |
Target (100%) |
Intermediate (125%) |
Maximum (150%) |
2018 Performance | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EPS Growth ($) |
142.9% ($14.37) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£$11.15 |
$12.25 |
$13.80 |
³$14.60 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Margin (%) |
106.6% (52.5%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£48% |
52% |
54% |
³58% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expense (in billions) |
50.0% ($11.91B) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
³$11.5B |
$10.9B |
|
£$10.3B |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
99.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||