ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We completed our initial public offering in January 1999. We were formed in October 1997 as a Delaware limited liability company owned 50% each by Data Broadcasting Corporation, or DBC, now known as Interactive Data Corporation, or IDC, and CBS Broadcasting Inc., or CBS. We were formed as the successor to DBC's Online/News Business, which commenced operations in October 1995. Immediately prior to the closing of our initial public offering, we were reorganized from a limited liability company into a corporation. In January 2001, an affiliate of Pearson, plc acquired IDC's stake in our Company.

Since our formation, we have operated as a multi-media provider of financial news and information, with services including news articles, feature columns, financial programming and analytic tools, such as stock quotes and charting. These services are available free of charge. We sell advertising banners and sponsorships on our Web sites; earn advertising revenue from our television and radio programming; license our content and tools to electronic brokers, financial publishers and portals; and sell subscriptions to our newsletters and other premium products.

We currently have several agreements with our principal stockholders, including a license agreement with CBS whereby it licenses its trademark and certain news content to us for royalties approximating 8% of all of our net revenues other than revenue attributable to IDC and certain other revenue. The license agreement expires in October 2005.

As of September 30, 2003, CBS and an affiliate of Pearson collectively hold approximately 65% of our outstanding common stock.

Our ability to generate significant revenue or maintain profitability in the future is uncertain. Further, in view of the rapidly evolving nature of our business and our limited operating history, we have little experience forecasting our revenues. Therefore, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and you should not rely upon them as an indication of our future performance. To date, we have incurred substantial costs to create, introduce and enhance our services, to develop content, to build brand awareness and to grow our business. Although we achieved net income in the fourth quarter of 2002 and third quarter of 2003 and were cash flow positive for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 and the first three quarters of 2003, given the general economic uncertainty and the continued uncertainty of the advertising market, we may not generate net income or remain cash flow positive for fiscal 2003 or any particular fiscal quarter. We may also incur additional costs and expenses related to content creation, technology, marketing or acquisitions of businesses and technologies to respond to changes in our rapidly changing industry. These costs could have an adverse effect on our future financial condition or operating results.

We restated our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 and our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2003 and 2002. The restatement reflects the adoption of a corrected method in which we calculate our quarterly CBS royalty expenses by recognizing royalty expenses based on the estimated effective annual royalty rate, which requires management to estimate the annual gross revenues subject to the CBS royalty fees and excluded revenues not subject to the CBS royalty fees, and apply the derived effective annual royalty rate to all revenues in each of the quarters within a fiscal year. Historically, we recognized CBS royalty expenses in the quarter in which it became obligated to pay such expenses based on the specified royalty rate applied to the relevant revenue of that quarter. The restatement has an effect on our cost of net revenues, gross profits, net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share for periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report provides a summary of the restatement for the periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. In addition, we restated our condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for each of the other quarters in fiscal years 2003 and 2002 and condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, and June 30, 2003 and 2002.

This restatement has no impact on our annual operating results, cash flow or royalty due to CBS, including fiscal 2003 and 2002 results, as the restatement relates to the timing of the accrual of the CBS royalty expenses among the quarters within a fiscal year.

Net revenues are derived from the sale of advertising on our Web sites, licensing of our content, advertising revenue from sponsored links, advertising revenues from our television and radio broadcasts, subscription sales of our newsletters, and other premium products and fees from our membership center. During the first nine months ended September 30, 2003, we reclassified certain broadcast and membership center revenues, previously disclosed as "Other," into advertising revenues. Prior periods have been adjusted to be comparable with the current presentation.

Net revenues increased by 5% to $11.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from $11.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, and increased 3% to $33.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 from $32.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, advertising revenue increased $1.4 million, or 30% and $2.9 million, or 22%, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2002. The increases in advertising revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to prior year, were primarily due to a 170% and 31%, respectively, increase in the number of advertisers on our Web sites and a 30% and 38%, respectively, improvement in rates charged for advertising sold on our television program. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, licensing revenue decreased $929,000, or 15%, and $2.5 million, or 13%, respectively, as compared to year. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to prior year, the decreases in licensing revenue were primarily due to the expiration of five year licensing commitment from IDC, which accounted for 34% and 38%, respectively, of the decrease, and the softness and consolidation of the financial services industry.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, subscription revenue increased $172,000, or 61% and $539,000, or 90%, respectively, as compared with the same periods in 2002. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, the increases in subscription revenue, as compared to prior year, were primarily due to the acquisition of the Hulbert Financial Digest in April 2002, which represented 6% and 46%, respectively, and the launch of The Calandra Report subscription product in March 2003 and the Tech Indicator subscription product in July 2003, which represented 71% and 32%, respectively, of the total increase, as compared with the same periods in 2002. Substantially all of our advertising customers purchase advertising under short-term contracts. Customers have ceased advertising on short notice without penalty. Our advertising revenues would be adversely affected if we were unable to renew advertising contracts with existing customers or obtain new customers. We expect to continue to derive a significant amount of our future net revenues from selling advertisements. The market for Web advertising is intensely competitive, therefore advertising rates could be subject to additional pricing pressure in the future. If we are forced to reduce our advertising rates or we experience lower CPMs (cost per thousand page views) across our Web sites for any reason, future advertising revenues could be adversely affected.

Licensing revenues depend on customer contract renewals and could decrease further if customers choose to renew for lesser amounts, terminate early or forego renewal, or we do not obtain new customers. A significant amount of our licensing revenue is earned from brokerages and financial services companies, which have experienced hardship due to the recent economic downturns. The amount of licensing revenues depends, in part, on the number of users these customers have each month. If the number of users were to decrease, our licensing revenue would decrease. The growth of our licensing revenues could also be limited as there are a limited number of brokerages and financial services companies to license our content. In addition, certain license contracts guarantee the performance of our Web sites. If our sites do not perform as guaranteed, licensing revenue would be adversely affected.

Cost of net revenues primarily consists of news staff compensation, royalties payable to CBS and content providers, bandwidth costs associated with serving pages on our Web properties and licensing clients, fees paid for data, Web site infrastructure costs, costs of serving ads, exchange fees and communication lines, and costs related to subscriptions, including printing and mailing costs.

Cost of revenues increased by 7% to $4.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from $4.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002. Of the aggregate increase in cost of revenues for the three-month periods, 85% of the increase was attributable to additional employee costs for news and operations and 23% of the increase was from additional CBS royalty fees due to higher advertising revenue for the current quarter, offset by a 12% decrease in data source fees. Cost of revenues increased by 5% to $13.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 from $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Of the aggregate increase in cost of revenues for the nine- month periods, 96% of the increase was attributable to additional employee costs for news and operations, offset by 20% decrease in advertising services costs due to renegotiations of our supplier contracts. As a percentage of net revenues, cost of revenues were 39% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 and 39% and 38% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Product development expenses primarily consist of data source fees, compensation and benefits for Web site developers, designers and engineers to maintain the sites, software engineers, and expenses for contract programmers and developers.

Product development expenses decreased by 24% to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002. Of the aggregate decrease in product development expenses for the three-month periods, 51% of the decrease was attributable to lower compensation expense from a reduction in head count, and 33% of the decrease was from a reduction in production data fees due to renegotiations of supplier contracts. Product development costs decreased 4% to $5.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 from $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease in development costs for the nine-month period was primarily attributable to lower employee costs as we had a reduction in headcount from the prior year. Product development expenses were 12% and 17% of net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and 15% and 16% of net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

General and administrative expenses primarily consist of compensation and benefits for finance, business development and administrative personnel, professional fees, public company costs and corporate depreciation charges.

General and administrative expenses increased by 4% to $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, and remained relatively flat for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to the same period a year ago. The aggregate increase in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was primarily attributable to hiring an additional executive, which contributed additional expense equal to 100% of the total increase and an increase in insurance cost, which contributed additional expense equal to 31% of the total increase, offset primarily by a decrease in legal costs which offset 36% of the total amount of the increase. As a percentage of net revenues, general and administrative costs were 24% for each of the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, and 25% and 26% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Sales and marketing expenses primarily consist of in-kind promotion and advertising provided by CBS, online and offline advertisements, promotional materials, compensation, benefits and sales commissions to our direct sales force.

Sales and marketing expenses decreased 17% to $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from $3.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002. Of the aggregate decrease in sales and marketing expenses for the three-month periods, 52% of the decrease was attributable to the termination of the CBS in-kind advertising as our agreement with CBS expired in June 2002 and 43% was attributable to lower distribution costs paid to American Online, Inc., or AOL, and Yahoo! Inc. as these services decreased in the current year. Sales and marketing costs decreased 58% to $7.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 from $17.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, primarily due to a $9.5 million decrease in CBS in-kind advertising. As a percentage of net revenues, sales and marketing expenses were 22% and 27% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and 22% and 54% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Interest income was $115,000 and $180,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Interest income was $384,000 and $545,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The $65,000 and $161,000 decreases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to prior year were primarily due to declines in returns from lower interest rates resulting from economic downturn over the last year, slightly offset by the $6.8 million increase in cash from year to year.

Since our inception in October 1997, we have funded our operations primarily from cash contributed and advanced by IDC and CBS, revenues from advertising and licensing sales and the proceeds from our initial public offering. Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $47.9 million at September 30, 2003, compared to $43.3 million at December 31, 2002.

Cash provided by operating activities was $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, primarily due to a net income of $17,000 and an adjustment for the effect of non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of $2.9 million, an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1.6 million and an increase in deferred revenue of $547,000, offset by an increase in prepaid expenses and accounts receivable of $914,000.

Cash provided by operating activities was $4.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, primarily consisting of a net loss of $10.6 million offset by non-cash charges of $9.6 million in advertising provided by CBS and $3.6 million in depreciation and amortization of property and equipment. Cash provided by operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 included a decrease in accounts receivable and an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offset by an increase in prepaid and other assets and a decrease in deferred revenue.

Cash used in investing activities was $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and consisted of payments of acquisition costs for the pending acquisition of Pinnacor, Inc. formerly known as ScreamingMedia, and capital expenditures for purchases of computer hardware and software.

Cash used in investing activities was $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and consisted of capital expenditures for purchases of computer software, computer hardware and leasehold improvements related to leased facilities and the April 2002 purchase of Hulbert Financial Digest.

Cash provided by financing activities was $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and reflected proceeds from the sale of common stock through our employee stock purchase plan in February and August 2003 and stock option exercises during the nine-month period.

Cash provided by financing activities was $453,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and primarily reflected proceeds from the sale of common stock through our employee stock purchase plan in February and August 2002.

As of September 30, 2003, commitments under non-cancelable operating leases totaled $9.9 million through December 31, 2010. Additionally, we have certain agreements with AOL, to make payments for advertising and placement of our content on their Web site over the next year. As of September 30, 2003, we are committed to pay $841,000 to AOL over the next 15 months.

We believe our current cash position will be sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. We may need to raise funds sooner if we acquire any additional businesses, products or technologies. If additional funds were raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of our then-current stockholders would be reduced. However, if CBS and/or Pearson elect to maintain their percentage interest pursuant to the exercise of their participation rights under their stockholders' agreement with the Company, then CBS and/or Pearson would not necessarily suffer a reduction in their respective ownership. Furthermore, such equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock.

We signed a definitive agreement on July 22, 2003 with Pinnacor, whereby we will acquire Pinnacor. Under the terms of the agreement, a new company, Holdco, was formed to combine our business with Pinnacor's business. Each of our stockholders will receive one share of Holdco common for each share of our common stock held by such stockholder. Each Pinnacor stockholder will have the right to receive either $2.42 in cash or 0.2659 of a share of Holdco common stock for each share of Pinnacor common stock held by such stockholder, subject to proration. The aggregate consideration to be paid to Pinnacor stockholders will be approximately $44.0 million in cash and approximately 6.5 million shares of Holdco common stock.  The acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval of our and Pinnacor stockholders.

On July 22, 2003, we entered into a merger agreement with Pinnacor Inc. pursuant to which we will acquire Pinnacor's business and establish a combined company. Under the terms of the agreement, based on the closing price and the number of outstanding shares of our common stock on July 22, 2003, upon the completion of the merger, which is currently anticipated to be in the fourth quarter of 2003, former Pinnacor stockholders will hold approximately 27%, and our stockholders will hold approximately 63%, of the outstanding common stock of the combined company. However, the completion of the merger is still subject to many conditions and we cannot assure you that the proposed merger will occur as scheduled, if at all. Moreover, the process of integrating the two businesses may be prolonged due to unforeseen difficulties and may require a disproportionate amount of our resources and management's attention. Furthermore, even if the merger is completed, we cannot assure you that the proposed benefits of the merger can be achieved or achieved at the level currently anticipated. All of the forward-looking statements made in this quarterly report with respect to our business, results of operations and financial condition are necessarily influenced, and would be materially affected, by our proposed merger with Pinnacor.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control. These factors include:

• fluctuations in traffic levels on our Web sites, which can be significant as a result of business, financial and other news events;
• fluctuating and unpredictable demand for advertising on our Web sites as well as on the Web in general;
• reductions in rates paid for Web advertising resulting from softening demand, competition, disruption of business due to threats of conflict or military action involving the United States, or other factors;
• changes in demand for licenses of our technology and news;
• our development efforts and the efforts of our competitors to introduce new products and services;
• our ability to enter into or renew on favorable terms our marketing and distribution agreements;
• seasonal fluctuations of advertising revenue as advertisers spend less in the first and third calendar quarters and user traffic on our Web sites have historically been lower during the summer and during year-end vacation and holiday periods;
• the amount and timing of our costs related to our marketing efforts or other initiatives;
• fees we may pay for distribution or content agreements or other costs we incur;
• the level of Web usage such as time spent online or number of pages viewed;
• costs associated with restructuring activity;
• technical difficulties or system downtime affecting the Web generally or the operation of our Web sites; or
• economic conditions specific to the Web as well as general economic conditions.

Although we generated net income in the fourth quarter of 2002 and third quarter of 2003 and were cash flow positive for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 and the first nine months of 2003, you should not rely on the results for those periods as an indication of future performance. In particular, given the general economic uncertainty and the softness of the advertising market, we may not remain cash flow positive or generate net income for fiscal 2003 or the remaining quarter in fiscal 2003.

Over time, our revenues have come from a mix of advertising, content licensing, broadcasting and subscription service fees. Licensing revenue declined in the first three quarters of 2003 primarily due to difficult market conditions faced by companies in the financial services industry. We expect our quarterly revenues and operating results to be particularly affected by changes in the level of our advertising and licensing revenue for each quarter. Our operating expenses are based on our current expectations of our future revenues and are relatively fixed in the short term. If we have lower revenues than we expect, we may not be able to quickly reduce our spending in response. We also may, from time to time, make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions that adversely affect our revenues in a given quarterly or annual period. Any shortfall in our revenues would have a direct impact on our operating results for a particular quarter and these fluctuations could affect the market price of our common stock in a manner unrelated to our long-term operating performance.

We expect to derive a substantial amount of our revenues from advertising for the foreseeable future. Over the last two years, we and other Web publishers have experienced a significant softening in demand for advertising services due to decreased spending on Web advertising by companies and general uncertainty about the economy. In addition, threats of conflict or military action involving the United States may further disrupt business, curb spending by companies or otherwise slow down economic recovery. Failure of the Web advertising market to recover would substantially harm our business and could result in a decline in the trading price of our common stock.

A substantial portion of our online advertising revenue comes from Internet commerce and financial services companies that have been adversely affected by the recent market downturn, which has resulted in these companies spending less for online advertising. If we do not diversify our advertiser base and continue to attract advertisers from other industries, our business could be adversely affected. Moreover, diversification of our advertising base may require us to adapt to different requirements and expectations that these new advertisers may have with respect to advertising programs, which could result in us experiencing significant marketing, sales, development and other expenses which may depress our earnings.

Further, some of the existing brokerage and financial services companies and customers in other markets that we target have merged and additional mergers may occur in the future, which would further reduce the number of our existing and potential customers. For example, in the prior year, Ameritrade, one of our customers, acquired Datek, which was also one of our customers. As a result, our online advertising revenue was adversely affected.

A significant amount of our revenue comes from advertisements displayed on our Web sites. We derive the majority of our revenue from the sale of advertisements under short-term contracts, which are difficult to forecast accurately. In addition, our advertising packages are sold in campaigns ranging from less than two weeks to a year or more. Advertisers generally have the right to cancel a campaign with two weeks notice without penalty. In cases where the advertiser is providing services, the agreements often have payments contingent on usage levels. Some of our advertisers are Internet companies that, in certain cases, may lack financial resources to fulfill their commitments. Accordingly, it is difficult to accurately forecast these revenues. Our expense levels are based in part on current expectations of future revenues and are fixed over the short term with respect to certain categories. We may be unable to adjust spending quickly enough to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, the cancellation or deferral of advertising agreements could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Generally, we compete with traditional advertising media, such as print, radio and television, for a share of the advertisers' total advertising budgets. Our advertising business would fail to expand or our advertising revenue would decrease if the Web were not perceived as an effective advertising medium. Also, advertisers that have traditionally relied upon other advertising media may be reluctant to advertise on the Web, especially given the general uncertainty in the economy. Advertisers that already have invested substantial resources in other advertising methods may be reluctant to adopt a new advertising strategy and may find it more difficult to measure the effectiveness of Web advertising. In addition, our advertising revenues could be adversely affected if we were unable to adapt to new forms of Web advertising or if "filter" software programs that limit or prevent advertising from being delivered to a Web user's computer are widely adopted and limit the commercial viability of Web advertising. Therefore, advertising revenues would be adversely affected if our Web sites are not perceived to offer desirable opportunities for online advertising.

No standard has been widely accepted to measure the effectiveness of Web advertising so different pricing models are used to sell advertising on the Web. It is difficult to predict which, if any, will emerge as the industry standard. This makes it difficult to project our future advertising rates and revenues. For example, advertising rates based on the number of "click throughs," or user requests for additional information made by clicking on the advertisement, instead of rates based solely on the number of impressions, or times an advertisement is displayed, could adversely affect our revenues because impression-based advertising comprises a substantial majority of our current advertising revenues. In addition, our advertising revenues could be adversely affected if we are unable to adapt to new forms of Web advertising.

Third party software programs are increasingly used to deliver selected advertisements based on the Web sites visited by the user. These advertisements usually are in the form of pop-up ads that are often based on the content the user is viewing at a particular time. Often this software is downloaded onto the user's computer without the user's knowledge, understanding or consent, as the software often comes bundled with other applications that the user downloads, such as file-sharing software or media players. The software can then track the user's Web surfing habits and display content, such as pop-up ads, that most users do not realize are not connected to the Web site they are then viewing. The pop-up ads may compete with the advertising, services and products that we sell on our Web sites, potentially infringe our copyrights, and can lead to confusion for our customers as the pop-up software deceives the user as to the origin of the advertisement. Also, our customers may blame us for defects in the services and products promoted by the pop-up ads or for fraud perpetuated against them in connection with such pop-up ads either of which could damage our reputation and result in the occurrence of significant damages. If the prevalence of such forms of software increase and no restrictions are placed on their usage, our business may be harmed.

We expect to derive a substantial portion of our revenues from the licensing of our content to customers. Licensing revenue depends on new customer contracts and customer contract renewals, and could decrease if new business is not found or customers renew for lesser amounts, terminate early or forego renewal. The ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers will depend on our ability to develop new products and services and the market acceptance of such products and services, neither of which may occur.

Also, we derive a significant percentage of our licensing revenue from a small number of large clients, and from brokerages and financial services companies. In many cases, the amount of licensing revenue depends on the number of qualified account holders these customers have each month. If the number of qualified account holders were to decrease, our licensing revenue could decrease. A number of these brokerages and financial services companies have experienced a decrease in account holders as a result of the recent market downturn. The growth of our licensing revenue could also be limited as there are a limited number of brokerages and financial services companies. In addition, certain license contracts guarantee the performance of our Web sites. If our sites do not perform as guaranteed, our licensing revenue would be adversely affected.

Further, a substantial portion of our licensing revenue comes from media and financial services companies, which have been adversely affected by the recent market downturn. If we do not diversify our client base and continue to attract customers from other industries, our business could be adversely affected. Moreover, some of the existing brokerage and financial services companies and customers in other markets that we target may have merged and additional mergers may occur in the future, which would further reduce the number of our existing and potential customers and adversely affect our licensing revenue. For example, in the prior year, Ameritrade, one of our customers, acquired Datek, which was also one of our customers. As a result, our licensing revenue was adversely affected.

Pursuant to our license agreement with CBS, we were granted the right to use the CBS name and logo, as well as CBS Television Network news content in connection with the operation of the CBS.MarketWatch.com Web site. This license agreement will expire on October 29, 2005 and CBS has no obligation to renew it. Also, under specific circumstances, CBS may terminate the license agreement earlier. If we are not able to renew our license agreement with CBS or CBS terminates the license agreement earlier than October 29, 2005, we would need to change the name of our Web site and devote substantial resources toward building a new brand name. Regardless of such expenditures, we may not be able to continue to attract a sufficient amount of user traffic and advertisers to our Web sites without the CBS name and logo or promotion from CBS.

Moreover, we are subject to a number of restrictions in consideration for the license grant and provision of news content from CBS. For example, CBS can require us to remove any content on our Web sites that it determines conflicts, interferes with or is detrimental to its reputation or business or which CBS deems inappropriate. We are also required to conform to CBS's guidelines for the use of its trademarks. CBS has the right to approve all materials, such as marketing materials, that include any CBS trademarks. CBS also has control over the visual and editorial presentation of its television news content on our Web sites. Because of these restrictions, we may not be able to perform our desired marketing activities, and if we fail to comply with these restrictions, CBS may terminate the license agreement.

Pursuant to our service agreement with Pearson, Pearson provides us with real-time financial data for dissemination to licensing clients and subscribers of certain of CBS.MarketWatch.com subscription services. If Pearson suspends delivery of delayed financial data or fails to provide such financial data satisfactorily, we would be required to perform these services ourselves or obtain these services from another provider. We may not be able to replace these services on cost effective or commercially reasonable terms or, if we choose to perform these services internally, we may not be able to perform them adequately. During any such transition, our services could be disrupted for an indefinite period of time and, as a result, we could lose a substantial number of users and advertisers. Pearson's obligation to provide us with real-time financial data expires on October 29, 2005 or, at such earlier time (i) as the services agreement is terminated; (ii) upon the occurrence of a change of control of Pearson, as specifically defined in a stockholders' agreement we entered into with Pearson; or (iii) at such time as Pearson shall hold less than 10% of our then-outstanding voting securities.

CBS and Pearson may experience conflicts of interest in their business dealings with us with respect to decisions involving business opportunities and other similar matters. For example:

• CBS could license its name and logo to other Web sites or Internet services that deliver general news, sports and entertainment. These sites or services could also offer financial news, so long as delivering comprehensive stock quotes and financial news to consumers in the English language is not their primary function and their principal theme and format;
• Pearson may provide hosting services to other Web sites;
• Pearson could also establish an advertising-supported Web site that does not have as its primary function and its principal theme and format the delivery of financial news and stock quotes;
• CBS or Pearson could license their respective content to other Web sites or Internet services; or
• CBS or Pearson could make certain investments in other Web sites or Internet services.

The occurrence of any of the above actions could adversely affect our business. For example, these sites or services supported by CBS or Pearson could compete with us or CBS and Pearson might promote these other sites or services more actively than they promote our Web sites and services.

We depend on establishing and maintaining distribution relationships with high-traffic Web sites for a portion of our traffic. There is intense competition for placements on these sites, and we may not be able to enter into such relationships on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Even if we enter into distribution relationships with these Web sites, they themselves may not attract a significant number of users and therefore, our Web sites may not receive the desired traffic from these relationships. Moreover, we may have to pay significant fees to establish or maintain these types of relationships.

Occasionally, we enter into agreements with advertisers, content providers or other high-traffic Web sites that require us to exclusively feature these parties in certain sections of our Web sites. Existing and future exclusivity arrangements may prevent us from entering into other content agreements, advertising or sponsorship arrangements or other strategic relationships. Many companies we may pursue for a strategic relationship also offer competing services. As a result, these competitors may be reluctant to enter into strategic relationships with us. Our business could be adversely affected if we do not establish and maintain additional strategic relationships on commercially reasonable terms or if any of our strategic relationships do not result in increased use of our Web sites.

The market for Internet services and products is relatively new, intensely competitive and rapidly changing. The number of Web sites on the Internet competing for consumers' attention and spending has proliferated and we expect that competition will continue to intensify. We compete, directly and indirectly, for advertisers, viewers, members and content providers with the following categories of companies:

• publishers and distributors of traditional off-line media, such as television, radio and print, including those targeted to business, finance and investing needs, many of which have established or may establish Web sites, such as The Wall Street Journal and CNN;
• general purpose consumer online services such as AOL and MSN, each of which provides access to financial and business-related content and services;
• Web sites targeted to business, finance and investing needs, such as TheStreet.com and the Motley Fool;
• Web search and retrieval and other online services, such as Google, Yahoo!, Lycos and other high-traffic Web sites, that offer quotes, financial news and other programming and links to other business and finance-related Web sites;
• data companies that provide value-added tools, including charts, portfolios and stock screeners, such as Reuters and Thomson Financial Corporation;
• providers of standardized and customized investment research tools, such as Pinnacor and SmartMoney; and
• publishers of financial news for an institutional audience such as Reuters and Dow Jones.

Many of our existing competitors, as well as a number of potential new competitors, have longer operating histories in the Web market, greater name recognition, larger customer bases, higher amounts of user traffic and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources. Such competitors may be able to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, make more attractive offers to potential employees, distribution partners, advertisers and content providers and may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in Web user requirements. Further, we cannot assure you that they will not develop services that are equal or superior to ours or that achieve greater market acceptance than our offerings. Increased competition could also result in price reductions, reduced margins, operating losses, or loss of market share, any of which could seriously harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Pinnacor has developed products and services that we do not currently possess that we would like to offer to our existing customers. In addition, Pinnacor has a significant engineering, development and technical staff that is dedicated to the development and enhancement of Pinnacor's existing products and services. If the merger is not consummated, our current engineering, development, and technical staff would not have the benefit of the expertise of Pinnacor's staff and may not be able to develop on a timely basis, if at all, products and services similar to Pinnacor's existing products and services or new products and services, or otherwise further develop or improve our existing products and services.

We rely primarily on a combination of copyrights, trademarks, trade secret laws, our user policy and content license agreement and user agreement restrictions on disclosure and use to protect our intellectual property, such as our content, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets. We also enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and consultants, and seek to control access to and distribution of our proprietary information. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third-party to copy or otherwise obtain, misappropriate, infringe and use the content on our Web sites or our other intellectual property without authorization. A failure to protect our intellectual property could seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, we may need to engage in litigation in order to enforce our intellectual property rights in the future or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and other resources, either of which could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We license certain technology, data and content from third parties. In these license agreements, the licensors generally agree to defend, indemnify and hold us harmless from any claim by a third-party that the licensed technology or content infringes any third party's intellectual property rights. However, we cannot assure you that the outcome of any litigation between such licensors and a third-party or between us and a third-party will not lead to royalty obligations for which we are not indemnified or for which such indemnification is insufficient or unavailable from the licensors, or that we will be able to obtain any additional license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The loss of or inability to obtain or maintain any of these technology or content licenses could result in delays in the introduction of new services until equivalent technology or content, if available, is identified, licensed and integrated.

Our Content License Arrangements May Subject Us to Intellectual Property Infringement and Indemnification Claims Which Would Be Costly to Defend

In our content license agreements, we generally agree to defend, indemnify and hold our licensees harmless from any claim by a third party that the licensed content infringes any third party's intellectual property rights. Infringement or other claims may be asserted or prosecuted against us and/or our clients in the future whether resulting from our internally developed intellectual property or technology or content licensed from third parties. Any future assertions or prosecutions could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. Any such claims, whether they are with or without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation and divert the attention of technical personnel and management or require us to introduce new content, technology or trademarks, develop non- infringing technology or content or enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us and our failure or inability to introduce new technology or content, develop non-infringing technology or content or license the infringed or similar technology or content on a timely basis, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

It is important to our advertisers that we accurately measure the demographics of our user base and the delivery of advertisements on our Web sites. We depend on third-party software to provide these measurement services. If the third-party is unable to provide these services in the future, we would be required to perform them ourselves or obtain them from another provider. This could cause us to incur additional costs or cause interruptions in our business during the time we are replacing these services. We have implemented and are implementing additional systems designed to record demographic data on our users. If we are not successful in developing these systems, we may not be able to accurately evaluate the demographic characteristics of our users. As a result, companies may not advertise on our Web sites or may pay less for advertising if they do not perceive our measurements or measurements made by third parties to be reliable.

We depend on our sales force to sell advertising on our Web sites and license our content. This involves a number of risks including:

• our sales personnel have, in a number of cases, only worked for us for a short period of time;
• our ability to hire, retain, integrate and motivate sales and sales support personnel;
• the length of time it takes new sales personnel to become productive; and
• the competition we face from other companies in hiring and retaining sales personnel.

If we are unable to attract and retain an appropriate sales force, our revenue may fail to increase or may decline.

As we grow, we may need to expand our operational systems, procedures and controls in order to support our business. If we are unable to accomplish any of these, our growth could be constrained and our business could be adversely affected.

We believe that our Web sites will be more attractive to advertisers if we develop a larger audience comprised of demographically favorable users which depends substantially on the introduction of enhanced products and services. For example, we acquired Hulbert Financial Digest and have begun to offer Hulbert newsletters through subscription. Also, we introduced The Calandra Report in March 2002 and the Tech Indicator in July 2003. We intend to introduce additional or enhanced services in the future. If the subscription products or other services we introduce are not favorably received, we may not attract new users and our current users may not continue to access our Web sites or use our services as frequently, which would make us less attractive to advertisers. New users could also choose competitive Web sites or services over ours. Moreover, if our new services do not achieve sufficient market acceptance and generate the anticipated revenues, we would not be able to recoup the costs of developing, marketing and maintaining such services.

We may also experience difficulties that could delay or prevent us from introducing new services. Furthermore, these services may contain errors that are discovered after the services are introduced. We may need to significantly modify the design of these services on our Web sites to correct these errors. Our business could be adversely affected if we experience difficulties in introducing new services or if users do not accept these new services.

Because we expect to depend significantly on advertising revenue for the foreseeable future, our business depends on businesses and consumers continuing to increase their use of the Web for obtaining news and financial information as well as for conducting commercial transactions. Our advertising revenue and therefore our business would be adversely affected if Web usage does not continue to grow. Web usage may be inhibited for a number of reasons, such as:

• inadequate network infrastructure;
• security concerns;
• inconsistent quality of service; and
• availability of cost-effective, high-speed service.

In the event Web usage grows, the Internet infrastructure may not be able to support the demands placed on it by this growth or its performance and reliability may decline. Web sites have experienced interruptions in their service as a result of outages and other delays occurring throughout the Internet network infrastructure. If these outages or delays frequently occur in the future, Web usage in general and usage of our Web sites in particular, could grow more slowly or decline.

We believe that our future success will depend in part on our continued ability to attract, integrate, retain and motivate highly qualified sales, technical, editorial and managerial personnel, and on the continued service of our senior management. Although we have employment agreements with some of our key executives, none of our personnel are bound by an employment agreement that prevents such person from terminating his or her employment with us at any time for any reason. At times we have experienced difficulties in attracting new personnel. If we cannot successfully attract, integrate, retain and motivate a sufficient number of qualified personnel, we may be unable to conduct our business in the future.

Our business relies on our ability to serve Web pages in a consistent and timely manner. In the past, our Web sites have experienced significant increases in traffic when there were significant business or financial news stories. In addition, the number of our users has increased over time and we are seeking to further increase our user base. If the traffic on our Web sites grows at a rate that our current communication lines cannot support, our Web pages will be served at a slower rate or we will be unable to serve pages at all.

We also rely on certain third-party providers for a significant amount of our current bandwidth capacity. If these providers are unable to maintain their service level agreements or we are unable to obtain additional bandwidth as our traffic grows, our business would be adversely affected. Our Web sites have in the past and may in the future experience slower response times and other problems for a variety of reasons. Also, our Web sites have in the past and may in the future experience down time and other problems due to server problems or capacity.

Our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions, which could lead to interruptions, delays or loss of data. In addition, unauthorized persons may improperly access our data. A number of popular Web sites have experienced attacks from "hackers" and other intrusions. Any disruption resulting from these actions may harm our business and may be very expensive to remedy, may not be fully covered by our insurance and could damage our reputation and discourage new and existing users from using our site. We may also incur significant costs to protect our Web sites against the threat of security breaches. We also provide indemnification to some of our licensing customers for unauthorized access to and use of customer data as a result of break-ins and other unauthorized access. Our defense of any action brought against us based upon improper access to confidential customer data or indemnification of our licensing customers for similar claims brought against them could be costly and involve significant distraction of our management and other resources. Also, our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect systems against damage from fire, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failure, and other events beyond our control. Our insurance policies have low coverage limits and therefore our insurance may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur due to any failures or interruptions in our systems.

We depend on multiple information providers, such as Comtex, FT Interactive Data, Dow Jones, Reuters and Thomson Financial Corporation, to provide information and data feeds on a timely basis. Our Web sites could experience disruptions or interruptions in service due to the failure or delay in the transmission or receipt of this information by its information providers which would be beyond our control. In addition, our customers depend on Internet service providers, online service providers and other Web site operators for access to our Web sites. We have experienced outages in the past, and could experience outages, delays and other difficulties due to system failures unrelated to our systems in the future. These occurrences could diminish Web users' experience or even result in users perceiving our Web sites as not functioning properly and therefore result in the loss of these users to other Web sites or sources to obtain their business, financial and other news and information.

Furthermore, we incorporate the data we receive from third parties, such a Dow Jones and Thomson Financial Corporation, into our licensing products. If such third party data providers or others perceive us as a competitor, they may discontinue providing services to us. Also, some of our third party data providers have restrictions on access to and use of these data, which may make our licensing products incorporating such data less attractive to our existing and potential customers, which in turn may adversely affect our licensing revenue.

Our market is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and frequent new product announcements, which are exacerbated by the growth of the Web and the intense competition in our industry. The process of developing new products and services related to our business is complex and uncertain, and failure to anticipate the changing needs of our users and customers and emerging technological and market trends could significantly harm our results of operations. In order to successfully adapt to our rapidly changing market, we must continually improve the performance, features and reliability of our products and services. We could incur substantial costs improving our products, services or infrastructure in order to adapt to these changes and compete within our industry. Our business could be adversely affected if we were to incur significant costs without adequate results or if we were unable to successfully adapt to these changes.

The need to securely transmit confidential information over the Internet has been a significant barrier to electronic commerce and communications over the Web. Any well-publicized compromise of security could deter more people from using the Web or from using it to conduct commercial transactions that involve transmitting confidential information, such as stock trades or purchases of goods or services. Because many of our advertisers seek to encourage people to use the Web to conduct financial transactions or purchase goods or services, our business could be adversely affected if Internet commerce declines due to security concerns.

Our data privacy policy is not to willfully disclose any individually identifiable information about any user to a third party without the user's consent. Despite this policy, however, if unauthorized third persons were able to penetrate our network security or otherwise misappropriate our users' personal information or credit card information, we could be subject to liability, including claims for unauthorized purchases with credit card information, impersonation or other similar fraud claims, and misuses of personal information, such as for unauthorized marketing purposes. New privacy legislation may further increase this type of liability. California, for example, recently passed a privacy law that would apply to a security breach that affects unencrypted, computerized personal information of a California resident. Furthermore, we could incur additional expenses if additional regulations regarding the use of personal information were introduced or if federal or state agencies were to investigate our privacy practices.

Furthermore, some of the licensing tools we have created and currently market to existing and potential customers require users to disclose personally identifiable information and allow us access to such confidential information. Due to concerns about user privacy issues, existing and potential licensing customers may be deterred from licensing these tools, which could harm our future licensing revenue.

We may be subjected to claims for libel, slander, defamation, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement or based on other theories relating to the information we publish on our Web sites or license to our customers. These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against online services as well as other print publications in the past. We could also be subjected to claims based upon the content that is accessible from our Web sites through links to other Web sites. Moreover, because we license some data and content from third parties, our exposure to various claims may increase. Although we generally obtain representations as to the origin and ownership of content licensed from third parties and generally obtain indemnification from these third parties to cover a breach of any such representations, we do not generally receive representations or indemnification that are sufficient to cover all liability relating to the third party content. Moreover, the indemnification provided by these third parties may be insufficient to provide adequate compensation for any breach of such representations, and our insurance may not adequately protect us against these types of claims and related indemnification obligations. Our defense of any action brought against us based upon the content that is accessible from our Web sites could be costly and involve significant distraction of our management's time and other resources.

Many legal questions relating to the Internet remain unclear and these areas of uncertainty may be resolved in ways that damage our business. It may take years to determine whether and how existing laws governing matters such as intellectual property, privacy, libel and taxation apply to the Internet. In addition, new laws and regulations that apply directly to Internet communications, commerce and advertising are becoming more prevalent. For example, the U.S. Congress has passed Internet-related legislation concerning copyrights, taxation and the online privacy of children. As the use of the Internet grows, there may be calls for further regulation, such as more stringent consumer protection laws. Finally, our distribution arrangements and customer contracts could subject us to the laws of foreign jurisdictions in unpredictable ways.

These possibilities could affect our business adversely in a number of ways. New regulations could make the Internet less attractive to users, resulting in slower growth in its use and acceptance than is expected. We may be affected indirectly by legislation that fundamentally alters the practicality or cost- effectiveness of utilizing the Internet, including the cost of transmitting over various forms of network architecture, such as telephone networks or cable systems, or the imposition of various forms of taxation on Internet-related activities. Complying with new regulations could result in additional cost to us, which could reduce our profit margins or leave us at risk of potentially costly legal action.

The continuing conflict in Iraq and the events of September 11, 2001, as well as events occurring in response or connection to them, including future terrorist attacks against United States targets, rumors or threats of war, actual conflicts involving the United States or its allies, or military disruptions may impact our operations. For example, the disruption of the global financial markets due to the events on September 11, 2001 including the shutdown of Nasdaq Stock Market and New York Stock Exchange, impacted the reporting of financial information on our Web sites. More generally, any of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending, including spending on the Web, to decrease, which may impact our online advertising revenues. Also, volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy has contributed to volatility in the stock prices of United States publicly traded companies. The continuing conflict in Iraq, and further acts of terrorism and civil disturbances in the United States or elsewhere could have a significant impact on our operating results, revenues and costs.

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of securities. Similarly, securities class action litigation has been brought against the company following the public announcement of a merger, acquisition or other business combination. We are a party to the securities class action litigations relating to our initial public offering and proposed merger with Pinnacor Inc., each as more fully described in Part II, Item 1, "Legal Proceedings." The defense of the litigations described in Item 1 have increased our expenses and diverted our management's attention and resources. An adverse outcome in the litigation relating to our proposed merger with Pinnacor may increase our expenses in consummating the proposed merger, divert the attention and resources of the integration team tasked to effectively assimilate and combine the two businesses, and cause the combined company following the merger to incur charges and other additional expenses. Also, an adverse outcome in the litigation could deter the successful completion of the merger or if the merger was permitted to proceed, seriously harm the business and results of operations of the combined company. Furthermore, we may in the future be the target of other securities class action or similar litigation.

We have made acquisitions in the past and may make acquisitions in the future. Acquisitions of companies, products or technologies entail numerous risks, including an inability to successfully assimilate acquired operations and products, diversion of management's attention, loss of key employees of acquired companies and substantial transaction costs. Some of the services acquired may require significant additional development before they can be marketed and may not generate revenue at anticipated levels. Moreover, future acquisitions by us may result in dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of additional debt, large one-time write-offs and the creation of goodwill or other intangible assets that could result in significant amortization expense. Any of these problems or factors could seriously harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Specifically, on July 22, 2003 we entered into a merger agreement with Pinnacor pursuant to which we will acquire Pinnacor's business and establish a combined company. The completion of the merger is currently anticipated to be in the fourth quarter of 2003 and is subject to various closing conditions, some of which are outside of our control. We cannot assure you that the proposed merger will occur as scheduled, if at all. We cannot predict the effects the completion of the merger, or the failure to complete the merger, will have on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

On July 30, 2002, President George W. Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The new act is designed to enhance corporate responsibility through new corporate governance and disclosure obligations, increase auditor independence, and tougher penalties for securities fraud. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ have adopted rules in furtherance of the act and are considering adopting others. This act and the related new rules and regulations will likely have the effect of increasing the complexity and cost of our company's corporate governance and the time our executive officers spend on such issues, and may increase the risk of personal liability for our board members, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executives involved in our company's corporate governance process. As a result, it may become more difficult for us to attract and retain board members and executive officers involved in the corporate governance process. In addition, we have experienced, and will continue to experience, increased costs associated with being a public company, including additional professional and independent auditor fees.

Currently CBS and Pearson beneficially own 65% of our outstanding common stock. Each of CBS and Pearson has nominated two representatives to serve on our board of directors. As a result of their ownership and board positions, CBS and Pearson individually and collectively are able to significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Such concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company. In addition, sales of significant amounts of shares held by either of CBS or Pearson or collectively, or the prospect of these sales, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

After the completion of the acquisition of Pinnacor, the former Pinnacor stockholders will hold approximately 26%, and our stockholders will hold approximately 74% of the outstanding stock of the combined company. As a result, CBS and Pearson's collective beneficial ownership will decrease to 48% of the combined company. In addition, under the terms of the merger agreement, Pinnacor will be entitled to nominate two members to the board of directors. As a result, the ability of CBS and Pearson to collectively control matters requiring board and stockholder approval will decrease.

The trading price of our stock has been and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations. During the last 52 week period ended September 30, 2003, the closing sale prices of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market ranged from $3.89 to $9.78. Our stock price may fluctuate in response to a number of events and factors, such as quarterly variations in operating results, announcements of technological innovations or new products and media properties by us or our competitors, changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts, the operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable, news reports relating to trends in our markets and general economic conditions. In addition, the stock market in general, and the market prices for Internet-related companies in particular, have experienced extreme volatility. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance.  

Interest rate sensitivity. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we have invested in may be subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the principal amount of our investment will probably decline. To minimize this risk, we maintain our portfolio of cash in money market funds and cash equivalents. In general, money market funds and short-term investments are not subject to market risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. As of September 30, 2003, all of our investments mature in 90 days or less.

Exchange Rate Sensitivity. We consider our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations to be minimal, as we do not have any sales denominated in foreign currencies. We have not engaged in any hedging transactions to date.

 
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We restated our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 and condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2003 and 2002. For a description of the restatement, see Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report.

As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.

In making this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer considered matters relating to our restatement of previously issued financial statements, including the processes that were undertaken to ensure that all material adjustments necessary to correct the previously issued financial statements were recorded. The restatement reflects the adoption of a corrected method by which we calculate the quarterly royalty fees due to CBS as a result of licensing of CBS news content and trademarks. In light of, among other things, the facts and circumstances relating to the restatement, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the restatement was not reflective of any material weakness (as defined under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) in our disclosure controls.

Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A.

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

On and after April 17, 2001, five shareholder class action lawsuits were filed against us, certain of our current and former officers and directors, and a number of investment banks, including some of the underwriters of our initial public offering. The lawsuits were filed in the Southern District of New York. The complaints were consolidated into a single action. Plaintiffs allege that the underwriter defendants agreed to allocate stock in the initial public offering to certain investors in exchange for excessive and undisclosed commissions and agreements by those investors to make additional purchases of stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. Plaintiffs allege that the prospectus for our initial public offering was false and misleading in violation of the securities laws because it did not disclose these arrangements. The action against us is being coordinated with approximately three hundred other nearly identical actions filed against other companies. The parties have recently reached a settlement where we are dismissed from the lawsuit in exchange for us assigning to the plaintiffs claims we may have against the underwriters. In addition, the settlement does not contemplate the payment of any company funds to the plaintiffs. A committee of our Board of Directors approved the settlement proposal on June 25, 2003. The settlement is still subject to approval by the court and as of the date of this filing, the court has not yet approved the settlement proposal.

Furthermore, on July 24, 2003, a shareholder class action lawsuit was filed against Pinnacor Inc., certain of Pinnacor's current officers and directors, and us in the Delaware Chancery Court. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 17, 2003, which named the new company, Holdco, which was formed to combine the two businesses, and its two wholly owned subsidiaries, Pine Merger Sub, Inc., and Maple Merger Sub, Inc., which were formed solely to complete the combination, as defendants to the action. The lawsuit purports to be a class action filed on behalf of holders of Pinnacor's common stock who allegedly are or will be threatened with injury arising from actions by the defendants in connection with the merger. The lawsuit alleges that the Pinnacor's directors breached their fiduciary duties in proceeding with the sale of Pinnacor to us by agreeing to an inadequate purchase price, which fails adequately to compensate Pinnacor shareholders for the loss of control of the company. The lawsuit alleges that we knowingly aided and abetted these breaches of fiduciary duty in some unspecified way. The lawsuit seeks an unspecified amount of damages and also prays for an injunction against consummation of the proposed transaction. The plaintiff has moved for expedited discovery and has requested the production of documents from Pinnacor and us. We have and Pinnacor has begun producing documents responsive to the plaintiff's request.

1. Index to Exhibits

The exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-Q are listed in the Index to Exhibits immediately preceding such exhibits, which Index to Exhibits is incorporated herein by reference.

2. Reports on Form 8-K

On July 23, 2003, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission to announce that NMP, Inc., the Company, Pinnacor Inc., Maple Merger Sub, Inc. and Pine Merger Sub, Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 22, 2003, to affect the combination of the Company and Pinnacor, as well as disclosed certain matters related to the combination. The Form 8-K also attached the press release announcing the combination and certain exhibits related to the combination were filed as exhibits to the Form 8-K. Moreover, in the same Form 8-K, the Company finished to the Commission a press release issued by the Company in connection with the announcement of its third quarter earnings results.

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.