Form 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-51728
American Railcar Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
43-1481791 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
100 Clark Street
St. Charles, Missouri 63301
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Telephone (636) 940-6000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405
of the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such a shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller
reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check One)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the
last business day or the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter was
approximately $159 million, based on the closing sales price of $16.78 per share of such stock on
The Nasdaq National Market on June 30, 2008.
As of February 20, 2009, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market, there were 21,302,296 shares of
common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts of the following document are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
Report:
(1) Proxy Statement for the Registrants 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Items 10, 11,
12, 13 and 14.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements contained in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Exchange Act). These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors,
which may cause our or our industrys actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements
regarding:
|
|
|
the impact of the current economic downturn and restricted credit markets, and the
impact of the continuation of these conditions; |
|
|
|
the health of and prospects for the overall railcar industry; |
|
|
|
our prospects in light of the cyclical nature of our business and the current economic
environment; |
|
|
|
anticipated trends relating to our shipments, revenues, financial condition or results
of operations; |
|
|
|
the sufficiency of our liquidity and capital resources; |
|
|
|
the conversion of our railcar backlog into revenues; |
|
|
|
anticipated production schedules for our products and the anticipated construction and
production schedules of our joint ventures; |
|
|
|
the impact and anticipated benefits of any acquisitions we may complete; |
|
|
|
the impact and costs and expenses of any litigation we may be subject to now or in the
future; |
|
|
|
compliance with covenants contained in our senior unsecured senior notes and in our
revolving credit facility; and |
|
|
|
the ongoing benefits and risks related to our relationship with Mr. Carl C. Icahn, our
principal beneficial stockholder and the chairman of our board of directors, and certain of
his affiliates. |
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as may, will,
should, could, would, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, projects,
predicts, potential and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Our actual results could be different from the results described in or anticipated by our
forward-looking statements due to the inherent uncertainty of estimates, forecasts and projections
and may be better or worse than anticipated. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements represent our estimates
and assumptions only as of the date of this report. We expressly disclaim any duty to provide
updates to forward-looking statements, and the estimates and assumptions associated with them,
after the date of this report, in order to reflect changes in circumstances or expectations or the
occurrence of unanticipated events except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. All
of the forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Risk
Factors set forth in Part I Item 1A of this report, as well as the risks and uncertainties
discussed elsewhere in this report. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these
cautionary statements. We caution you that these risks are not exhaustive. We operate in a
continually changing business environment and new risks emerge from time to time.
2
AMERICAN RAILCAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
AMERICAN RAILCAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
PART I
Item 1: Business
INTRODUCTION
We are a leading North American designer and manufacturer of hopper and tank railcars. We also
repair and refurbish railcars, provide fleet management services and design and manufacture certain
railcar and industrial components. We provide our railcar customers with integrated solutions
through a comprehensive set of high quality products and related services.
Our primary customers include companies that purchase railcars for lease by third parties, or
leasing companies, industrial companies that use railcars for freight transport, or shippers, and
Class I railroads. In servicing this customer base, we believe our integrated railcar repair,
refurbishment and fleet management services and our railcar components manufacturing business help
us further penetrate the general railcar manufacturing market. These products and services provide
us with cross-selling opportunities and insights into our customers railcar needs that we use to
improve our products and services and enhance our reputation.
We operate in two reportable segments: manufacturing operations and railcar services. Manufacturing
operations consist of railcar manufacturing and railcar and industrial component manufacturing.
Railcar services consist of railcar repair, refurbishment and fleet management services. Financial
information about our business segments for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is set
forth in Note 23 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We were incorporated in Missouri in 1988 and reincorporated in Delaware in January 2006. Unless the
context otherwise requires, references to our company, we, us and our, refer to us and our
consolidated subsidiaries and our predecessors.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Our principal executive offices are located at 100 Clark Street, Saint Charles, Missouri 63301, our
telephone number is (636) 940-6000 and our internet website is located at
http://www.americanrailcar.com.
We are a reporting company and file annual, quarterly, and special reports, proxy statements and
other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). You may read and copy these
materials at the Public Reference Room maintained by the SEC at Room 1580, 100 F Street N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for more information on the
operation of the public reference room. The SEC maintains an Internet site at
http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other
information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Copies of our annual,
quarterly and special reports, Audit Committee Charter, Code of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics
for Senior Financial Officers are available on our web site at
http://www.americanrailcar.com or free of charge by contacting our Investor Relations
Department at American Railcar Industries, Inc., 100 Clark Street, Saint Charles, Missouri, 63301.
ARI®, Pressureaide®, Center Flow® and our railcar logo are our U.S. registered trademarks. Each
trademark, trade name or service mark of any other company appearing in this report belongs to its
respective holder.
OUR HISTORY
Since our formation in 1988, we have grown our business from being a small provider of railcar
components and maintenance services to one of North Americas leading integrated providers of
railcars, railcar components, railcar maintenance services and fleet management services.
At our Paragould, Arkansas manufacturing complex, we primarily manufacture hopper railcars, but
have the ability to manufacture many other types of railcars. At our Marmaduke, Arkansas
manufacturing complex, we manufacture tank railcars. Over the last couple of years, we have
completed two major expansions at our Marmaduke complex,
adding capacity to the existing plant and constructing a flexible railcar manufacturing plant that
has the ability to manufacture tank and other types of railcars.
4
Our operations now include three railcar assembly, sub-assembly and fabrication complexes, three
railcar and industrial component manufacturing facilities, six railcar repair plants and four
mobile repair facilities. Our services business has grown to include online access by customers,
remote fleet management, expanded painting, lining and cleaning offerings, regulatory consulting
and engineering support.
We are party to three joint ventures. Our Ohio Castings Company, LLC (Ohio Castings) joint venture
manufactures and sells various railcar parts for distribution to third parties and to us. We own a
one-third interest in Ohio Castings through our wholly owned subsidiary, Castings, LLC (Castings).
In 2007, we participated in the formation of Axis, LLC (Axis), a joint venture to manufacture and
sell axles for distribution to third parties and the joint venture partners. We expect production
to begin in the second quarter of 2009. We own a 37.5% interest in Axis through a wholly owned
subsidiary. In 2008, we participated in the formation of a joint venture to manufacture and sell
railcars for distribution to third parties in India following the construction of a manufacturing
facility. We own a 50.0% interest in the Indian joint venture through wholly-owned subsidiaries. We
believe that our involvement in these joint ventures allows us to further vertically integrate our
supply chain and expand into developing markets.
OUR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
We design and manufacture special, customized and general purpose railcars and a wide range of
components primarily for the North American railcar and industrial markets. We also support the
railcar industry through a variety of integrated railcar services, including repair, maintenance,
consulting, engineering and fleet management services.
Manufacturing Operations
We primarily manufacture two types of railcars; hopper railcars and tank railcars, but we have the
ability to produce additional railcar types. We also manufacture various components for railcar and
industrial markets.
Covered hopper railcars
We manufacture both general service and specialty covered hopper railcars at our Paragould complex.
All of our covered hopper railcars may be equipped with varying combinations of hatches, discharge
outlets and protective coatings to provide our customers with a railcar designed to perform in
precise operating environments. The flexible nature of our covered hopper railcar design allows it
to be quickly modified to suit changing customer needs. This flexibility can continue to provide
value after the initial purchase because our railcars may be converted for reassignment to other
services or customers.
Our covered hopper railcars are specifically designed for shipping a variety of dry bulk products,
from light density products, such as plastic pellets, to high density products, such as cement.
Depending upon the equipment on the railcars, they can operate in a gravity, positive pressure or
vacuum pneumatic unloading environment. Since its introduction, we have improved our Center Flow®
line of covered hopper railcars to provide protection for a wide range of dry bulk products and to
enhance the associated loading, unloading and cleaning processes. Examples of these improvements
include new designs of the shape of the railcars, joint designs, outlet mounting frames and loading
hatches and discharge outlets, which enhance the cargo loading and unloading processes.
We have several versions of our covered hopper railcar that target specific customers and specific
loads, including:
|
|
|
Grain Railcars. These railcars are a large group of covered hopper railcars within our
general service covered hopper railcar product offering. These grain railcars service the
food markets, starch markets and energy markets. For example, these railcars carry
shipments of grain to animal feedstock processing plants, grain mills and ethanol
facilities. |
|
|
|
Cement Railcars. Cement loads are heavier than many other loads of comparable volume,
and therefore cement railcars are smaller to compensate for the weight. Consequently, we
can build more cement covered hopper railcars per day than we can build of any other
covered hopper railcar that we manufacture. |
5
|
|
|
Plastic Pellet Railcars. These railcars are designed to transport, load and unload
plastic pellets under precise specifications to preserve the purity of the load. Slight
imperfections in the railcars transporting such goods or in the components that load and
unload them can ruin an entire load. If plastic pellets within a load become tainted, the
imperfection will likely persist during the conversion of the plastic pellets into
end-products. Examples of such cargo would be food grade plastic pellets used in the
production of food and medical product containers. |
|
|
|
Pressureaide® Railcars. Our Pressureaide® railcar is targeted towards the bulk powder
markets. Pressureaide® railcars typically handle products such as clays, industrial and
food grade starches and flours. They operate with internal pressures up to 14.5 pounds per
square inch, which expedites unloading, and are equipped with several safety devices, such
as pressure relief valves and a rupture disc. |
Tank railcars
We manufacture non-pressure and high pressure tank railcars at our Marmaduke complex. Our tank
railcars are designed to enable the handling of a variety of commodities including petroleum
products, ethanol, asphalt, vegetable oil, corn syrup and other food products. Our high pressure
tank railcars transport products that require a pressurized state due to their liquid, semi-gaseous
or gaseous nature, including chlorine, anhydrous ammonia, liquid propane and butane. Most of our
pressure tank railcars feature a thicker pressure retaining inner shell that is separated from a
jacketed outer shell by layers of insulation, thermal protection or both. Our pressure tank
railcars are made from specific grades of normalized steel that are selected for toughness and ease
of welding. Most of our tank railcars feature a sloped bottom tank that improves the flow rate of
the shipped product and provides improved drainage. Many of our tank railcars feature coils that
are steam-heated to decrease cargo viscosity, which improves the transported products flow rate
and speeds unloading. We can alter the design of our tank railcars to address specific customer
requirements.
In addition to manufacturing tank railcars ourselves, in May 2007, we entered into an agreement
with ACF Industries, LLC (ACF), pursuant to which we agreed to purchase certain of our requirements
for tank railcars from ACF. ACF is controlled by Mr. Carl C. Icahn, our principal beneficial
stockholder and the chairman of our board of directors. The agreement will terminate on the later
of the completion of 1,388 tank railcars or March 23, 2009. See Note 22 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for more information on our agreements with ACF.
Other railcar types
We have the ability to produce other railcar types including intermodal, gondola, open top
hopper and aluminum coal railcars with bottom and rotary discharge.
Component manufacturing
In addition to manufacturing railcars, we also manufacture custom and standard railcar components.
Our products include tank railcar components and valves, tank heads, discharge outlets for covered
hopper railcars, manway covers and valve body castings, outlet components and running boards for
industrial and railroad customers and hitches for the intermodal market. We use these components in
our own railcar manufacturing and sell certain of these products to third parties, including our
competitors.
We also manufacture aluminum and special alloy steel castings that we sell primarily to industrial
customers. These products include castings for the trucking, construction, mining and oil and gas
exploration markets, as well as finished, machined aluminum castings, other custom machined
products and commercial mixing bowls.
Railcar Services
Our primary railcar services are repair, refurbishment and fleet management services. Our primary
customers for these services are leasing companies and shippers. We can service the entire railcar
fleets of our customers, including railcars manufactured by other companies. Our railcar services
provide us insights into our customers railcar needs that we can use to improve our products.
These services also may create new customer relationships and enhance relationships with our
existing customers.
6
Repair and refurbishment
Our repair and refurbishment services include light and heavy railcar repairs, exterior painting,
interior lining application and cleaning, tank and safety valve testing, railcar inspections, wheel
replacement and conversion or reassignment of railcars from one purpose to another. We support our
railcar repair and refurbishment services customers through a combination of full service repair
shops, mobile repair units and mini-shop locations. Our repair shops, like our manufacturing
facilities, are strategically located near major rail lines used by our customers and suppliers and
close to some of the major industries we serve.
Fleet management
Some of the principal features of our fleet management services business include maintenance
planning, engineering services, field engineering services, regulatory compliance, mileage audit,
rolling stock taxes and online service access.
SALES AND MARKETING
We utilize an integrated marketing and sales effort to coordinate relationships in our
manufacturing and services operations. We sell and market our products in North America through our
sales and marketing staff, including sales representatives who sell directly to customers, catalogs
through which our customers have access to our railcar components, and our website, through which
customers can order specialty components. Our marketing activities also include participation in
trade shows, participation in industry forums and distribution of sales literature.
In 2008, The CIT Group, Inc. accounted for approximately 45.2% of our consolidated revenues,
American Railcar Leasing, LLC (ARL) accounted for approximately 24.6% of our consolidated revenues
and GATX accounted for approximately 12.2% of our consolidated revenues. In 2008, sales to our top
ten customers accounted for approximately 90.7% of our revenues. ARL is an affiliate of Carl C.
Icahn, our principal beneficial stockholder and the chairman of our board of directors.
BACKLOG
We define backlog as the number and sales value of railcars that our customers have committed in
writing to purchase from us that have not been recognized as revenues. Our total backlog as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $373.1 million and $966.5 million, respectively. We estimate that
approximately 82.9% of our December 31, 2008, backlog will be converted to revenues by the end of
2009. Included in the railcar backlog at December 31, 2008 was $132.6 million of railcars to be
sold to our affiliate, ARL. Customer orders may be subject to requests for delays in deliveries,
inspection rights and other customary industry terms and conditions, which could prevent or delay
backlog from being converted into revenues.
The following table shows our reported railcar backlog, and estimated future revenue value
attributable to such backlog, at the end of the period shown. The reported backlog includes
railcars relating to purchase obligations based upon an assumed product mix consistent with past
orders. Changes in product mix from what is assumed would affect the dollar amount of our backlog.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Railcar backlog at January 1 |
|
|
11,929 |
|
|
|
16,473 |
|
New railcars delivered |
|
|
(7,965 |
) |
|
|
(7,055 |
) |
New railcar orders |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railcar backlog at December 31 |
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
|
11,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated railcar backlog value at end
of period (in thousands) 1 |
|
$ |
373,062 |
|
|
$ |
966,470 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimated backlog value reflects the total revenues expected to be attributable to the
backlog reported at the end of the particular period as if such backlog were converted to
actual revenues. Estimated backlog reflects known price adjustments for material cost changes
but does not reflect a projection of any future material price adjustments that are provided
for in certain customer contracts. |
7
Historically, we have experienced little variation between the number of railcars ordered and the
number of railcars actually delivered, however, our backlog is not necessarily indicative of our
future results of operations. Our backlog includes commitments under multi-year purchase and sale
agreements. Under these agreements, the customers have agreed to buy a minimum number of railcars
from us in each of the contract years, and typically may choose to satisfy their purchase
obligations from among a variety of railcars described in the agreements. As delivery dates could
be extended on certain orders, we cannot guarantee that our reported railcar backlog will convert
to revenue in any particular period, if at all, nor can we guarantee that the actual revenue from
these orders will equal our reported backlog estimates or that our future revenue efforts will be
successful.
SUPPLIERS AND MATERIALS
Our business depends on the adequate supply of numerous railcar components, such as railcar wheels,
brakes, sideframes, axles, bearings, yokes, tank railcar heads, bolsters and other heavy castings,
and raw materials, such as steel and normalized steel plate, used in the production of railcars.
Due to our vertical integration efforts, including our involvement in joint ventures, we have the
current capability to produce tank railcar heads and assemble wheel sets along with numerous other
railcar components. We also expect our Axis joint venture to begin producing railcar axles by the
second quarter of 2009.
The cost of raw materials and railcar components represents approximately 80% to 85% of the direct
manufacturing costs of most of our railcar product lines. Most of our railcar manufacturing
contracts contain provisions for price adjustments that track fluctuations in the prices of certain
raw materials and railcar components, including steel, so that increases in our manufacturing costs
caused by increases in the prices of these raw materials and components are passed on to our
customers. Conversely, if the price of those materials or components decreases, a discount is
applied to reflect the decrease in cost.
Our customers often specify particular railcar components and the suppliers of such components. We
continually monitor inventory levels to ensure adequate support of production.
In 2008, no single supplier accounted for more than 8.0% of our total purchases and our top ten
suppliers accounted for 34.2% of our total purchases.
Steel
We use hot rolled steel coils, as-rolled steel plate and normalized steel plate to manufacture
railcars. There are only two domestic suppliers of the form and size of normalized steel plate that
we need for our manufacturing operations, and these suppliers are our only source of this product.
We can acquire hot rolled steel coils and as-rolled steel plate from other suppliers. Normalized
steel plate is a special form of heat-treated steel that is stronger and is more resistant to
puncture than as-rolled steel plate. Normalized steel plate is required by Federal regulations to
be used in tank railcars carrying certain types of hazardous cargo, including liquefied petroleum
gas. We use normalized steel plate in the production of many of our tank railcars.
Tank heads and floor sheet reinforcements
ACF currently supplies us with various railcar components. See Note 22 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for more information on our agreements with ACF. Due to our expansion efforts
in 2008, we now have the ability to manufacture tank railcar heads at our Marmaduke, Arkansas
complex.
Castings
Heavy castings we use in our railcar manufacturing primarily include bolsters, sideframes, couplers
and yokes. These castings form part of the truck assemblies upon which railcars are mounted. We
obtain a significant portion of our castings requirements from our joint venture, Ohio Castings.
8
Wheels and brakes
In the past, there have been supply constraints and shortages of wheels and brakes used in
railcars. Currently, there are only a limited number of domestic suppliers of each of these
components. In the past, we have also imported some wheels. We also obtain limited quantities of
refurbished wheels from scrapped railcars.
Axles
Axles have historically been capacity constrained critical components of manufacturing railcars
with only two suppliers. We have formed a joint venture, Axis, to produce railcar axles for us and
other railcar manufacturers. The facility that will manufacture these axles is expected to be
completed and begin production in the second quarter of 2009.
COMPETITION
The railcar manufacturing business has historically been extremely competitive and has become even
more so in the current economic environment. In 2008, competition and pricing pressures from
customers increased due to the decline in the economy and the railcar industry. We compete
primarily with Trinity Industries, Inc. and National Steel Car Limited in the hopper railcar market
and with Trinity Industries and Union Tank Car Company in the tank railcar market. Other
competitors have expanded their capabilities into our focused railcar markets.
We face intense competition in our other markets as well. Our competition for the sale of railcar
components includes our competitors in the railcar manufacturing market as well as a concentrated
group of companies whose primary business focus is the production of one or more specialty
components. We compete with numerous companies in our railcar services businesses, ranging from
companies with greater resources than we have to small, local companies.
In addition to price, competition in all of our markets is based on quality, reputation,
reliability of delivery, customer service and other factors.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We believe that manufacturing expertise, the improvement of existing technology and the development
of new products may be more important than patent protection in establishing and maintaining a
competitive advantage. Nevertheless, we have obtained several patents and will continue to make
efforts to obtain patents, when available, in connection with our product development and design
activities.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2008, we had 2,353 full-time employees in various locations throughout the
United States and Canada, including 2,195 engaged in our manufacturing, railcar repair and railcar
fleet management operations and 158 in various corporate support functions. At our Longview, Texas
and North Kansas City, Missouri repair facilities, and at our Longview, Texas steel foundry and
components manufacturing facility, 39, 44 and 146 hourly employees, respectively, are covered by
collective bargaining agreements. These agreements expire in January 2010, September 2010 and April
2011, respectively. We are also party to a collective bargaining agreement at our idled Milton,
Pennsylvania repair facility, which expired on June 19, 2005. The contract provisions under the
agreement provide that the contract would remain in effect under the old terms until terminated by
either party with 60 days notice. As of December 31, 2008, this agreement had not been terminated.
9
REGULATION
The Federal Railroad Administration, or FRA, administers and enforces U.S. Federal laws and
regulations relating to railroad safety. These regulations govern equipment and safety compliance
standards for railcars and other rail equipment used in interstate commerce. The Association of
American Railroads, or AAR, promulgates a wide variety of rules and regulations governing safety
and design of equipment, relationships among railroads with respect to railcars in interchange and
other matters. The AAR also certifies railcar manufacturers and component manufacturers that
provide equipment for use on railroads in the United States. New products must generally undergo
AAR testing and approval processes. For example, our Axis joint venture production facility is
awaiting AAR certification, which is expected prior to the start of
expected production in the second
quarter of 2009. Because of these regulations, we must maintain certifications with the AAR as a
railcar manufacturer, and products that we sell must meet AAR and FRA standards. We must comply
with the rules of the U.S. Department of Transportation, or DOT, and we are subject to oversight by
Transport Canada that also requires certification. To the extent that we expand our business
internationally, we will increasingly be subject to the regulations of other non-U.S.
jurisdictions.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
We are subject to comprehensive Federal, state, local and international environmental laws and
regulations relating to the release or discharge of materials into the environment, the management,
use, processing, handling, storage, transport or disposal of hazardous materials and wastes, or
otherwise relating to the protection of human health and the environment. These laws and
regulations expose us to liability for the environmental condition of our current or formerly owned
or operated facilities and our own negligent acts, and also may expose us to liability for the
conduct of others or for our actions that complied with all applicable laws at the time these
actions were taken. In addition, these laws may require significant expenditures to achieve
compliance, and are frequently modified or revised to impose new obligations. Civil and criminal
fines and penalties and other sanctions may be imposed for non-compliance with these environmental
laws and regulations. Our operations that involve hazardous materials also raise potential risks of
liability under the common law.
Environmental operating permits are, or may be, required for our operations under these laws and
regulations. These operating permits are subject to modification, renewal and revocation. We
regularly monitor and review our operations, procedures and policies for compliance with permits,
laws and regulations. Despite these compliance efforts, risk of environmental liability is inherent
in the operation of our businesses, as it is with other companies engaged in similar businesses. We
are involved in investigation and remediation activities at properties that we now own or lease to
address historic contamination and potential contamination by third parties. We are also involved
with state agencies in the cleanup of two sites under these laws. These investigations are in
process but it is too early to be able to make a reasonable estimate, with any certainty, of the
timing and extent of remedial actions that may be required, and the costs that would be involved in
such remediation. Substantially all of the issues identified relate to the use of the properties prior to their transfer to us in 1994 by
ACF and for which ACF has retained liability for
environmental contamination that may have existed at the time of transfer to us. ACF has also
agreed to indemnify us for any cost that might be incurred with those existing issues. However, if
ACF fails to honor its obligations to us, we would be responsible for the cost of such remediation.
In connection with its ongoing obligations, ACF, in consultation with us, is investigating and, as
appropriate, remediating those sites that it transferred to us.
We believe that our operations and facilities are in substantial compliance with applicable laws
and regulations and that any noncompliance is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our
operations or financial condition.
Future events, such as new environmental regulations or changes in or modified interpretations of
existing laws and regulations or enforcement policies, or further investigation or evaluation of
the potential health hazards of products or business activities, may give rise to additional
compliance and other costs that could have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions
and operations. In addition, we have historically conducted investigation and remediation
activities at properties that we own to address historic contamination. To date, such costs have
not been material. Although we believe we have satisfactorily addressed all known material
contamination through our remediation activities, there can be no assurance that these activities
have addressed all historic contamination. The discovery of past contamination or the release of
hazardous substances into the environment at our current or formerly owned or operated facilities
could require us in the future to incur investigative or remedial costs or other liabilities that
could be material or that could interfere with the operation of our business.
In addition to environmental laws, the transportation of commodities by railcar raises potential
risks in the event of a
derailment or other accident. Generally, liability under existing law in the United States for a
derailment or other accident depends on the negligence of the party, such as the railroad, the
shipper or the manufacturer of the railcar or its components. However, for hazardous commodities
being shipped, strict liability concepts may apply.
10
Item 1A: Risk Factors
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
The highly cyclical nature of the railcar industry may result in lower revenues during economic
downturns.
The North American railcar market has been, and we expect it to continue to be highly cyclical. The
recent worldwide financial turmoil and associated economic downturn has adversely affected the
railcar industry generally and sales of our railcars and other products and caused us to slow our
production rates. For example, over approximately the past year and a half, we have experienced a
decrease in demand and an increase in pricing pressures in our railcar markets, and over the past
three years our new railcar orders have declined from 8,910 in 2006, to 2,511 in 2007, to 279 in
2008. We anticipate that the current economic downturn is likely to continue to adversely affect
sales of our railcars and other products and we expect our shipments and revenues to decrease in
2009 from 2008. We cannot assure you that these conditions will improve soon, if at all. Downturns
in part or all of the railcar manufacturing industry may continue to occur in the future, resulting
in decreased demand for our products and services.
A substantial number of the end users of our railcars acquire railcars through leasing arrangements
with our leasing company customers. The current economic environment and restricted credit markets
have resulted in stricter borrowing conditions and, in some cases, higher interest rates for new
borrowings, both of which could increase the cost of or potentially deter new leasing arrangements.
These factors could cause our leasing company customers to purchase fewer railcars. In addition,
the slow-down of the United States economy has reduced and may continue to reduce requirements for
the transport of products carried by the railcars we manufacture. These factors have resulted and
may continue to result in decreased demand and increased pricing pressures on the sales of
railcars. Sales of other of our industrial products also have been and may continue to be adversely
affected by the slow-down in industrial output, as well. All of these factors could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We depend upon a small number of customers that represent a large percentage of our revenues. The
loss of any single significant customer, a reduction in sales to any such significant customer or
any such significant customers inability to pay us in a timely manner could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Railcars are typically sold pursuant to large, periodic orders, and therefore, a limited number of
customers typically represent a significant percentage of our railcar sales in any given year. Our
top ten customers based on consolidated revenues represented, in the aggregate, approximately
90.7%, 87.9% and 87.1% of our total consolidated revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Moreover, our top three customers based on revenues represented, in the aggregate, approximately
82.0%, 80.1% and 59.9% of our total consolidated revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In
2008, sales to each of these top three customers represented approximately 45.2%, 24.6% and 12.2%
of our total consolidated revenues. In addition, one of our customers accounted for 42.4% of our
backlog as of December 31, 2008. The loss of any significant portion of our sales to any major
customer, the loss of a single major customer or a material adverse change in the financial
condition of any one of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and financial results. If one of our significant customers was unable to pay
due to financial conditions, it could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
We operate in a highly competitive industry and we may be unable to compete successfully, which
would materially adversely affect our results of operations.
We face intense competition in all of our markets. In each of our hopper and tank railcar
manufacturing businesses, we have two principal competitors. Certain of our competitors have
recently expanded their capabilities into our focused railcar markets. Any of these competitors
may, from time to time, have greater resources than we do. Some
railcar manufacturers produce railcars primarily for use in their own railcar leasing operations,
competing directly with leasing companies, some of which are our largest customers. Our current
competitors may increase their participation, or new competitors may enter into the railcar markets
in which we compete. Strong competition within the industry, which has been exacerbated by the
recent economic downturn, has led to pricing pressures and could limit our ability to maintain or
increase prices or obtain better margins on our railcars. These pressures may intensify if
consolidation among our competitors occurs. If we produce any types of railcars other than what we
currently produce, we will be competing with other manufacturers that may have more experience with
that railcar type.
11
New competitors, or alliances among existing competitors, may emerge in the railcar components
industry and rapidly gain market share. We compete with numerous companies in our railcar fleet
management and railcar repair services businesses, ranging from companies with greater resources
than we have to small, local companies.
Technological innovation by any of our existing competitors, or new competitors entering any of the
markets in which we do business, could put us at a competitive disadvantage and could cause us to
lose market share. Increased competition for the sales of our railcars, our fleet management and
repair services and our railcar components could result in price reductions, reduced margins and
loss of market share, which could materially adversely affect our prospects, business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The level of our reported railcar backlog may not necessarily indicate what our future revenues
will be and our actual revenues may fall short of the estimated revenue value attributed to our
railcar backlog.
We define backlog as the number of railcars, and the revenue value in dollars attributed to these
railcars, to which our customers have committed in writing to purchase from us that have not yet
been recognized as revenues. Our competitors may not define railcar backlog in the same manner as
we do, which could make comparisons of our railcar backlog with theirs misleading. Customer orders
may be subject to requests for delays in deliveries, inspection rights and other customary industry
terms and conditions, which could prevent or delay our railcar backlog from being converted into
revenues. Our reported railcar backlog may not be converted into revenues in any particular period,
if at all, and the actual revenues from such sales may not equal our reported estimates of railcar
backlog value.
The cost of raw materials and components that we use to manufacture railcars, particularly steel,
are subject to escalation and surcharges and could increase. Any increase in these costs or
delivery delays of these raw materials may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The cost of raw materials, including steel, and components, including scrap metal, used in the
production of our railcars, represents approximately 80% to 85% of our manufacturing costs. We have
provisions in most of our current railcar manufacturing contracts that allow us to pass on to our
customers, price fluctuations in and surcharges related to certain raw materials, including steel,
as well as certain components. We may not be able to pass on price increases to our customers in
the future, which could adversely affect our operating margins and cash flows. Any fluctuations in
the price or availability of steel, or any other material or component used in the production of
our railcars, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. Such price increases could reduce demand for our railcars. As customers may not
accept contracts with price adjustment clauses in the future, we may lose railcar orders or may be
required to enter into contracts with fixed pricing provisions or other less favorable contract
terms, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
If any of our raw material or component suppliers were unable to continue their businesses or were
to seek bankruptcy relief, the availability or price of the materials we use could be adversely
affected. Deliveries of our raw materials and components may also fluctuate depending on various
factors including supply and demand for the raw material or component, or governmental regulation
relating to the raw material or component, including regulation relating to importation.
12
Fluctuations in the supply of components and raw materials we use in manufacturing railcars, which
are often only available from a limited number of suppliers, could cause production delays or
reductions in the number of railcars we manufacture, which could materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our railcar manufacturing business depends on the adequate supply of numerous railcar components,
such as railcar wheels, brakes, tank railcar heads, sideframes, axles, bearings, yokes, bolsters
and other heavy castings. Some of these components are only available from a limited number of
domestic suppliers. Strong demand can cause industry-wide shortages of many critical components as
reliable suppliers could reach capacity production levels. Supply constraints in our industry are
exacerbated because, although multiple suppliers may produce certain components, railcar
manufacturing regulations and the physical capabilities of manufacturing facilities restrict the
types and sizes of components and raw materials that manufacturers may use. In addition, we do not
carry significant inventories of certain components and procure many of our components on an as
needed basis. In the event that our suppliers of railcar components and raw materials were to stop
or reduce the production of railcar components and raw materials that we use, or refuse to do
business with us for any reason, our business would be disrupted. Our inability to obtain
components and raw materials in required quantities or of acceptable quality could result in
significant delays or reductions in railcar shipments and could materially or adversely affect our
operating results.
If any of our significant suppliers of railcar components were to shut down operations our business
and financial results could be affected as we may incur substantial delays and significant expense
in finding alternative sources
The quality and reliability of alternative sources may not be the same and these alternative
sources may charge significantly higher prices.
Equipment failures, delays in deliveries or extensive damage to our facilities, particularly our
railcar manufacturing complexes in Paragould or Marmaduke, Arkansas, could lead to production or
service curtailments or shutdowns.
An interruption in manufacturing capabilities at our complexes in Paragould or Marmaduke or at any
of our component manufacturing facilities, whether as a result of equipment failure or any other
reason, could reduce, prevent or delay production of our railcars or railcar and industrial
components, which could alter the scheduled delivery dates to our customers and affect our
production schedule. This could result in the termination of orders, the loss of future sales and a
negative impact to our reputation with our customers and in the railcar industry, all of which
could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.
All of our facilities are subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events,
such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornados or weather conditions. We may experience
plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production as a result of equipment failures, loss of power,
delays in equipment deliveries, or extensive damage to any of our facilities, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
The variable purchase patterns of our railcar customers and the timing of completion, customer
acceptance and shipment of orders may cause our revenues and income from operations to vary
substantially each quarter, which could result in significant fluctuations in our quarterly
results.
Railcar sales comprised approximately 86.0%, 83.5% and 83.1% of our total consolidated revenue in
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our results of operations in any particular quarterly period may
be significantly affected by the number and type of railcars manufactured and shipped in that
period, which is impacted by customer needs that vary greatly year to year, as discussed above. The
customer acceptance and shipment of our railcars determines when we record the revenues associated
with our railcar sales and, as a result, are likely to cause fluctuations in our quarterly results.
As a result of these fluctuations, we believe that comparisons of our sales and operating results
between quarterly periods within the same year and between quarterly periods within different years
may not be meaningful and, as such, these comparisons should not be relied upon as indicators of
our future performance.
Our efforts to manage overhead and production slowdowns may result in the loss of key employees.
As a result of less demand and increased competition for some of our railcar products, we have
implemented production slowdowns and are managing our overhead costs in order to improve our
manufacturing efficiencies. We may need to increase these efforts and such production slowdowns and
decreases to overhead costs may result in the loss of skilled, trained, qualified production and
management employees, upon which our business substantially
depends. If we do lose the services of such key employees due to production slowdowns or otherwise,
we may not be able to rehire such personnel, and suitable new employees may not be available, if
and when our production needs later increase.
13
We may pursue acquisitions or joint ventures that involve inherent risks, any of which may cause us
not to realize anticipated benefits and we may have difficulty integrating the operations of any
companies that we acquire, which may adversely affect our results of operations.
We may not be able to successfully identify suitable acquisition or joint venture opportunities or
complete any particular acquisition, business combination, joint venture or other transaction on
acceptable terms. Our identification of suitable acquisition candidates and joint venture
opportunities and the integration of acquired business operations involve risks inherent in
assessing the values, strengths, weaknesses, risks and profitability of these opportunities. This
includes their effects on our business, diversion of our managements attention and risks
associated with unanticipated problems or unforeseen liabilities and may require significant
financial resources that could otherwise be used for the ongoing development of our business.
The difficulties of integration may be increased by the necessity of coordinating geographically
dispersed organizations, integrating personnel with disparate business backgrounds and combining
different corporate cultures. These difficulties could be further increased to the extent we pursue
acquisition or joint venture opportunities internationally, where we do not have significant
experience, such as our joint venture in India. In addition, we may not be effective in retaining
key employees or customers of the combined businesses. We may face integration issues pertaining to
the internal controls and operations functions of the acquired companies and we may not realize
cost efficiencies or synergies that we anticipated when selecting our acquisition candidates. In
addition, we may experience managerial or other conflicts with our joint venture partners. Any of
these items could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our failure to identify suitable acquisition or joint venture opportunities may restrict our
ability to grow our business. If we are successful in pursuing future acquisitions or joint
ventures, we may be required to expend significant funds, incur additional debt or issue additional
securities, which may materially adversely affect our results of operations and be dilutive to our
stockholders. If we spend significant funds or incur additional debt, our ability to obtain
financing for working capital or other purposes could decline and we may be more vulnerable to
economic downturns and competitive pressures.
Our failure, or the failure of our joint ventures to complete capital expenditure projects on time
and within budget, or the failure of these projects, once constructed, to operate as anticipated
could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Construction plans we may have from time to time, and the current and any future construction plans
of our joint ventures are subject to a number of risks and contingencies over which we may have
little control and that may adversely affect the cost and timing of the completion of those
projects, or the capacity or efficiencies of those projects once constructed. If these capital
expenditure projects do not achieve the results anticipated, we may not be able to satisfy our
operational goals on a timely basis, if at all. If we or our joint ventures are unable to complete
the construction of any of such capital expenditure projects on time or within budget, or if those
projects do not achieve the capacity or efficiencies anticipated our business, financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
If we lose any of our executive officers or key employees, our operations and ability to manage the
day-to-day aspects of our business may be materially adversely affected.
Our future performance will substantially depend on our ability to retain and motivate our
executive officers and key employees, both individually and as a group. If we lose any of our
executive officers or key employees, which have many years of experience with our company and
within the railcar industry and other manufacturing industries, or are unable to recruit qualified
personnel, our ability to manage the day-to-day aspects of our business may be materially adversely
affected. The loss of the services of one or more of our executive officers or key employees, who
also have strong personal ties with customers and suppliers, could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We do not currently maintain key
person life insurance.
14
Uncertainty surrounding acceptance of our new railcar offerings by our customers, and costs
associated with those new offerings, could materially adversely affect our business.
Our strategy depends in part on our continued development and sale of new railcar designs to expand
or maintain our market share in our current railcar markets. Any new or modified railcar designs
that we develop may not gain widespread acceptance in the marketplace and any such products may not
be able to compete successfully with existing railcar designs or new railcar designs that may be
introduced by our competitors. Furthermore, we may experience significant initial costs of
production of new railcar product lines related to training, labor and operating inefficiencies. To
the extent that the total costs of production significantly exceed our anticipated costs of
production, we may incur a loss on our sale of new railcar product lines.
Our reliance on the railroads to provide a means of transportation for our railcars may cause our
revenues and income from operations to vary each quarter, which could result in fluctuations in our
quarterly results.
The shipment of our railcars determines when we record the revenues associated with our railcar
sales and, as a result, will cause fluctuations in our quarterly results. The railroads could
potentially go on strike or have other service interruptions, which could ultimately create a
logjam and potentially cause us to slow down or halt our shipment and production schedules, which
could have a materially adverse affect on our financial results.
We are subject to a variety of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and the cost
of complying, or our failure to comply, with such requirements may have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to a variety of Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations relating
to the release or discharge of materials into the environment; the management, use, processing,
handling, storage, transport or disposal of hazardous materials; or otherwise relating to the
protection of public and employee health, safety and the environment. These laws and regulations
expose us to liability for the environmental condition of our current or formerly owned or operated
facilities, and may expose us to liability for the conduct of others or for our actions that
complied with all applicable laws at the time these actions were taken. They may also expose us to
liability for claims of personal injury or property damage related to alleged exposure to hazardous
or toxic materials. Despite our intention to be in compliance, we cannot guarantee that we will at
all times comply with all such requirements. The cost of complying with these requirements may also
increase substantially in future years. If we violate or fail to comply with these requirements, we
could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators. In addition, these requirements are complex,
change frequently and may become more stringent over time, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Our failure to maintain and comply with environmental permits that we are required to maintain
could result in fines, penalties or other sanctions and could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations. Future events, such as new environmental regulations, changes in or modified
interpretations of existing laws and regulations or enforcement policies, newly discovered
information or further investigation or evaluation of the potential health hazards of products or
business activities, may give rise to additional compliance and other costs that could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions and operations.
In addition to environmental, health and safety laws, the transportation of commodities by railcar
raises potential risks in the event of a derailment or other accident. Generally, liability under
existing law in the United States for a derailment or other accident depends on the negligence of
the party, such as the railroad, the shipper, or the manufacturer of the railcar or its components.
However, for certain hazardous commodities being shipped, strict liability concepts may apply.
15
As a public company, we are required to comply with the reporting obligations of the Exchange Act
and are required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we fail to comply with
the reporting obligations of the Exchange Act and Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or if we
fail to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting, our business, results of
operations and financial condition, and investors confidence in us, could be materially adversely
affected.
As a public company, we are required to comply with the periodic reporting obligations of the
Exchange Act, including preparing annual reports, quarterly reports and current reports. Our
failure to prepare and disclose this information in a timely manner could subject us to penalties
under Federal securities laws, expose us to lawsuits and restrict our ability to access financing.
If we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we may not be able to
ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over
financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Moreover, effective
internal controls are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to
help prevent fraud. Our failure to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act on a timely basis could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our
financial statements, which in turn could harm our business and negatively impact the trading price
of our common stock.
If we face labor shortages or increased labor costs, our growth and results of operations could be
materially adversely affected.
Due to the competitive nature of the labor markets in which we operate and the cyclical nature of
the railcar industry, the resulting employment cycle increases our risk of not being able to
retain, recruit and train the personnel we require in our railcar manufacturing and other
businesses, particularly in periods of economic expansion. Our inability to recruit, retain and
train adequate numbers of qualified personnel on a timely basis could materially adversely affect
our ability to operate our businesses, our financial condition and our results of operations.
Our Ohio Castings, Axis and India joint ventures, and our relationships with our partners in those
joint ventures, may not be successful, which could materially adversely affect our business.
If any of our joint ventures generate significant losses, it could affect our financial results. If
our Axis and India joint ventures are unable to start up operations effectively and in a timely
manner or incur significant losses at the onset of operations, our financial results or financial
position could be adversely impacted. We have financial guarantees associated with obligations of
our joint ventures and if those joint ventures fail to honor those obligations for any reason, our
obligation to satisfy those guarantees could materially adversely affect our financial position.
Our investment activities are subject to risks that may adversely affect our results of operations,
liquidity and financial condition.
From time to time we may invest in marketable securities, or derivatives thereof, including higher
risk equity securities and high yield debt instruments. These securities are subject to general
credit, liquidity, market risks and interest rate fluctuations that have affected various sectors
of the financial markets and caused overall tightening of the credit markets and the decline in the
stock markets. The market risks associated with any investments we may make may have a negative
adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
Our investments at any given time also may become highly concentrated within a particular company,
industry, asset category, trading style or financial or economic market. In that event, our
investment portfolio will be more susceptible to fluctuations in value resulting from adverse
economic conditions affecting the performance of that particular company, industry, asset category,
trading style or economic market than a less concentrated portfolio would be. As a result, our
investment portfolio could become concentrated and its aggregate return may be volatile and may be
affected substantially by the performance of only one or a few holdings.
For reasons not necessarily attributable to any of the risks set forth in this Form 10-K (for
example, supply/demand imbalances or other market forces), the prices of the securities in which we
invest may decline substantially.
Companies affiliated with Mr. Carl C. Icahn are important customers, suppliers and manufacturers.
We manufacture railcars and railcar components and provide railcar services for companies
affiliated with Mr. Carl C. Icahn, our principal beneficial stockholder and the chairman of our
board of directors. To the extent our relationships with affiliates of Mr. Carl C. Icahn change due
to the sale of his interest in us or otherwise, our business, results of operations and financial
condition may be materially adversely affected.
16
Affiliates of Mr. Carl C. Icahn have accounted for approximately 24.5%, 22.4% and 10.7% of our
consolidated revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. This revenue is primarily attributable
to our sale of railcars to ARL, a railcar leasing company owned by affiliates of Mr. Carl C. Icahn,
which currently purchases all of its railcars from us, but is not required to do so in the future.
We also purchase railcar and industrial components from ACF, another entity affiliated with
Mr. Carl C. Icahn. ACF has supplied us with certain railcar components and those purchases have
amounted to $44.7 million, $46.9 million and $81.5 million of our inventory purchases in 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Currently, ACF is our sole supplier of important railcar components that we
use in our manufacturing operations. These railcar components are manufactured and sold to us under
a supply agreement that is terminable by us at the end of any contract year upon six months prior
notice. We cannot guarantee that we would be able to obtain alternative supplies of these railcar
components on a timely basis and on comparable terms if we were no longer able to purchase these
railcar components from ACF.
ACF also manufactures certain of our tank railcar requirements pursuant to a manufacturing
agreement we entered into in May 2007, which will terminate the later of March 23, 2009, or the
completion of 1,388 tank railcars. If ACF is unable to manufacture these tank railcars up to our
quality standards or on a timely basis, our railcar production and deliveries to our customers
could be delayed.
If a sublease provided to us by ARL, an entity controlled by Mr. Carl C. Icahn, is terminated, we
may need to find new headquarters space, which may require us to incur additional costs.
We currently sublease our headquarters office space in St. Charles, Missouri, from ARL. The
arrangement may be terminated by either party upon six months notice or by mutual agreement and, if
it were terminated, we would be required to relocate our office headquarters. As this agreement was
negotiated with ARL, an entity affiliated with us, the rates charged to us under this agreement may
be lower than rates that may be charged by an unaffiliated third party for an office sublease. If
this agreement is terminated, we many incur additional expenses, which could adversely affect our
results of operations.
As a public company, we may have reduced access to resources of, and benefits provided by, entities
affiliated with Mr. Carl C. Icahn.
We believe that our relationship with entities affiliated with Mr. Carl C. Icahn have, in many
cases, provided us with a competitive advantage in identifying opportunities for sales of our
products and identifying and attracting partners for critical supply and buying arrangements. If we
were unable to participate in these supply and buying group arrangements, our manufacturing costs
could increase and our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely
affected.
We are involved in investigation and remediation activities relating to facilities previously owned
by ACF, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations if significant liabilities relating to these activities arise and ACF is not able to
honor the obligations.
We have various investigations and cleanups of sites in process, but it is too early to be able to
make a reasonable estimate, with any certainty, of the timing and extent of remedial actions that
may be required, and the costs that would be involved in such remediation. Substantially all of the
issues identified relate to the use of the properties prior to their transfer to us in 1994 by ACF
and for which ACF has retained liability and agreed to indemnify us. However, if ACF fails to honor
its obligations to us, we would be responsible for the cost of such remediation. The discovery of
historic contamination or the release of substances into the environment at our current or formerly
owned or operated facilities could require ACF or us in the future to incur investigative or
remedial costs or other liabilities that could be material or that could interfere with the
operation of our business. Any environmental liabilities we may incur that are not covered by
adequate insurance or indemnification will also increase our costs and have a negative impact on
our profitability.
17
Some of our railcar services and component manufacturing employees belong to labor unions and
strikes or work stoppages by them or unions formed by some or all of our other employees in the
future could adversely affect our operations.
We are a party to collective bargaining agreements with labor unions at our Longview, Texas, North
Kansas City, Missouri and our Milton, Pennsylvania repair facilities and at our Longview, Texas
steel foundry and components manufacturing facility. As of December 31, 2008, the covered employees
at these sites collectively represent approximately 9.7% of our total workforce. Disputes with
regard to the terms of these agreements or our potential inability to negotiate acceptable
contracts with these unions in the future could result in, among other things, strikes, work
stoppages or other slowdowns by the affected workers. We cannot guarantee that our relations with
our railcar services workforce will remain positive nor can we guarantee that union organizers will
not be successful in future attempts to organize our railcar manufacturing employees or employees
at some of our other facilities. If our workers were to engage in a strike, work stoppage or other
slowdown other employees were to become unionized or the terms and conditions in future labor
agreements were renegotiated, we could experience a significant disruption of our operations and
higher ongoing labor costs. In addition, we could face higher labor costs in the future as a result
of severance or other charges associated with layoffs, shutdowns or reductions in the size and
scope of our operations.
Changes in assumptions or investment performance related to pension and other postretirement
benefit plans that we sponsor could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results
of operations.
We are responsible for making funding contributions to two of our three pension plans and are
liable for any unfunded liabilities that may exist should the plans be terminated. Under certain
circumstances, such liability could be senior to our unsecured senior notes. Our liability and
resulting costs for these plans may increase or decrease based upon a number of factors, including
actuarial assumptions used, the discount rate used in calculating the present value of future
liabilities, and investment performance, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations. The fair value of defined benefit pension plan
assets described in Note 16 to the condensed consolidated financial statements has declined due to
the economic downturn. There is no assurance that interest rates will remain constant or that our pension fund assets can earn 8.0% annually,
and our actual experience may be significantly more negative. Our pension expenses and funding may also be greater than
we currently anticipate if our assumptions regarding plan earnings and expenses turn out to be incorrect. Similarly,
our other post retirement benefits expenses may also be greater than we currently anticipate if our assumptions
regarding such expenses turn out to be incorrect.
We also provide certain postretirement health care benefits for certain of our salaried and hourly
employees and retirees. Our postretirement benefit obligations and related expense with respect to
these postretirement benefits also increase or decrease based on several factors, including changes
in health care cost trend rates, and could similarly be materially adversely affected by adverse
changes in these factors.
Our manufacturers warranties expose us to potentially significant claims.
We may be subject to significant warranty claims in the future relating to workmanship and
materials. These types of warranty claims could result in costly product recalls, significant
repair costs and damage to our reputation, which could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Unresolved warranty claims could result in users of
our products bringing legal actions against us. For example, we have been named as the defendant in
a lawsuit in which the plaintiff claims we were responsible for the damage caused by allegedly
defective railcars that were manufactured by us. The plaintiff alleges that failures in certain
components caused the contents transported by these railcars to spill out of the railcars causing
property damage, clean-up costs, monitoring costs, testing costs and other costs and damages.
Our revolving credit facility, as amended, and our unsecured senior notes contain, and any
additional financing we may obtain could contain, covenants that restrict our ability to engage in
certain transactions and may impair our ability to respond to changing business and economic
conditions.
Complying with the covenants under our revolving credit facility, as amended, and our unsecured
senior notes may limit our managements discretion by restricting our ability to:
|
|
|
redeem our capital stock; |
|
|
|
enter into certain transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
pay dividends and make other distributions; |
|
|
|
make investments and other restricted payments; and |
18
Any additional financing we may obtain could contain similar or more restrictive covenants. Our
ability to comply with any covenants may be adversely affected by general economic conditions,
political decisions, industry conditions and other events beyond our control. As a result, we
cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with these covenants, when and if they become
applicable to us. Our failure to comply with these covenants should they become applicable to us,
could result in an event of default, which could materially and adversely affect our operating
results, our financial condition and liquidity.
If there were an event of default under our revolving credit facility, as amended, or any other
financing arrangement, and amounts were then outstanding thereunder, the holders of the defaulted
debt could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to that debt to be due and payable
immediately. We cannot assure you that our assets or cash flow would be sufficient to fully repay
amounts due under any of our financing arrangements if accelerated upon an event of default, or
that we would be able to repay, refinance or restructure the payments under any such arrangements.
In addition, our revolving credit facility expires in October 2009. While we currently intend to
obtain a new credit facility effective upon the current agreements expiration, we cannot guarantee
that we will be able to obtain such a facility or other new financing on favorable terms, if at
all.
Our substantial indebtedness, as a result of the offering of our outstanding unsecured senior
notes, could adversely affect our operations and financial results and prevent us from fulfilling
our obligations under the notes.
Our substantial indebtedness, consisting of our $275.0 million of unsecured senior notes, and any
potential future liability under our revolving credit facility, as amended, could have important
consequences to our investors. For example, it could:
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the notes and
other indebtedness; |
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to
payments on our indebtedness, which would reduce the availability of our cash flow to fund
working capital, capital expenditures, expansion efforts and other general corporate
purposes; |
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the
industry in which we operate; |
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt;
and |
|
|
|
limit, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds for working capital,
capital expenditures, general corporate purposes or acquisitions. Failure to comply with
these covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could
have a significant adverse effect on us. |
Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able to incur substantially more debt, as may
our subsidiaries, which could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial
indebtedness.
Despite our restrictions under our revolving credit facility, as amended, and our indenture
governing our unsecured senior notes, we may be able to incur future indebtedness, including
secured indebtedness and this debt could be substantial. Any additional secured borrowings by us
and any borrowings by our subsidiaries would be senior to the notes. If new debt is added to our,
or our subsidiaries, current debt levels, the related risks that we or they now face could be
magnified.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to service all of our obligations, including
our obligations under our revolving credit facility and unsecured senior notes.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, including the indebtedness
incurred under our revolving credit facility, as amended, and the unsecured senior notes, and to
fund planned capital expenditures, strategic transactions or expansion efforts will depend on our
ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to economic,
financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.
19
Our business may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and there can be no
assurance that future borrowings will be available to us in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay
our indebtedness as such indebtedness matures and to fund our other liquidity needs. If this is the
case, we will need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity, and
cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including our
revolving credit facility, as amended, and the unsecured senior notes, on commercially reasonable
terms, or at all. We could have to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying
planned expenses and capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring debt, or obtaining
additional equity or debt financing. These financing strategies may not be affected on satisfactory
terms, if at all. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness or obtain additional financing and to
do so on commercially reasonable terms will depend on our financial condition at the time,
restrictions in agreements governing our indebtedness, the indenture governing the notes, and other
factors, including the condition of the financial markets and the railcar industry.
If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations and additional borrowings, refinancings
or proceeds of asset sales are not available to us, we may not have sufficient cash to enable us to
meet all of our obligations, including payments on the unsecured senior notes.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property and prevent its improper use by third
parties, our ability to compete in the market may be harmed.
Various patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark laws afford only limited protection and may
not prevent our competitors from duplicating our products or gaining access to our proprietary
information and technology. These means also may not permit us to gain or maintain a competitive
advantage.
Any of our patents may be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable. We
cannot guarantee that we will be successful should one or more of our patents be challenged for any
reason. If our patent claims are rendered invalid or unenforceable, or narrowed in scope, the
patent coverage afforded our products could be impaired, which could significantly impede our
ability to market our products, negatively affect our competitive position and materially adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
Our pending or future patent applications held by us may not result in an issued patent and, if
patents are issued to us, such patents may not provide meaningful protection against competitors or
against competitive technologies. The United States Federal courts may invalidate our patents or
find them unenforceable. Competitors may also be able to design around our patents. Other parties
may develop and obtain patent protection for more effective technologies, designs or methods. If
these developments were to occur, it could have an adverse effect on our sales. If our intellectual
property rights are not adequately protected we may not be able to commercialize our technologies,
products or services and our competitors could commercialize our technologies, which could result
in a decrease in our sales and market share and could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Our products could infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which may lead to
litigation that could itself be costly, result in the payment of substantial damages or royalties,
and prevent us from using technology that is essential to our products.
We cannot guarantee you that our products, manufacturing processes or other methods do not infringe
the patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties. Infringement and other
intellectual property claims and proceedings brought against us, whether successful or not, could
result in substantial costs and harm our reputation. Such claims and proceedings can also distract
and divert management and key personnel from other tasks important to the success of our business.
In addition, intellectual property litigation or claims could force us to do one or more of the
following:
|
|
|
cease selling or using any of our products that incorporate the asserted intellectual
property, which would adversely affect our revenue; |
|
|
|
pay substantial damages for past use of the asserted intellectual property; |
|
|
|
obtain a license from the holder of the asserted intellectual property, which license
may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all; and |
|
|
|
redesign or rename, in the case of trademark claims, our products to avoid infringing
the intellectual property rights of third parties, which may be costly and time-consuming
even if possible. |
20
In the event of an adverse determination in an intellectual property suit or proceeding, or our
failure to license essential technology, our sales could be harmed and our costs could increase,
which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Increasing insurance claims and expenses could lower profitability and increase business risk.
Increased insurance premiums may further increase our insurance expense as coverages expire or
cause us to raise our self-insured retention. If the number or severity of claims within our
self-insured retention increases, we could suffer costs in excess of our reserves. An unusually
large liability claim or a series of claims based on a failure repeated throughout our mass
production process may exceed our insurance coverage or result in direct damages if we were unable
or elected not to insure against certain hazards because of high premiums or other reasons. In
addition, the availability of, and our ability to collect on, insurance coverage is often subject
to factors beyond our control. Moreover, any accident or incident involving us, even if we are
fully insured or not held to be liable, could negatively affect our reputation among customers and
the public, thereby making it more difficult for us to compete effectively, and could materially
adversely affect the cost and availability of insurance in the future.
Our failure to comply with regulations imposed by Federal and foreign agencies could negatively
affect our financial results.
New regulatory rulings and regulations from Federal or foreign regulatory agencies may impact our
financial condition and results of operations. If we fail to comply with the requirements and
regulations of these agencies that impact our manufacturing, safety and other processes we may face
sanctions and penalties that could materially adversely affect our results of operations.
Reductions in the availability of energy supplies or an increase in energy costs may increase our
operating costs.
Various factors including hostilities between the United States and foreign power or natural
disasters could result in a real or perceived shortage of petroleum and/or natural gas, which could
result in an increase in the cost of electricity and the energy sources we use to manufacture our
railcars. Future limitations on the availability or consumption of petroleum products or an
increase in energy costs, particularly electricity for plant operations, could have a materially
adverse effect upon our business and results of operations.
We may be required to reduce the value of our inventory, long-lived assets and/or goodwill, which
could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We may be required to reduce inventory carrying values using the lower of cost or market approach
in the future due to a decline in market conditions in the railcar business, which could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Future events could
cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill associated with our
acquired businesses is impaired. Any resulting impairment loss related to reductions in the value
of our long-lived assets or our goodwill could materially adversely affect our financial condition
and results of operations.
The Company performs an annual goodwill impairment test as of March 1 of each year. Given market
conditions, including but not limited to the change in our business climate, goodwill was tested
for impairment as of December 31, 2008. As discussed in Note 11, to our financial statements, no
impairment loss was noted. Assumptions used in our impairment test regarding future operating
results of our reporting units could prove to be inaccurate. This could cause an adverse change in
our valuation and thus any of our goodwill impairment tests may have been flawed. Any future
impairment tests are subject to the same risks.
21
The price of our common stock is subject to volatility.
The market price for our common stock has varied between a high closing sales price of $42.31 per
share and a low closing sales price of $6.10 in the past eighteen months. This volatility may
affect the price at which you could sell our common stock. In addition, the broader stock market
has recently experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has affected
the market prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating
performance and may adversely affect the price of our common stock.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of their stock, many companies
have been the subject of securities class action litigation. If we became involved in securities
class action litigation in the future, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of our
managements attention and resources and could harm our stock price, business, prospects, results
of operations and financial condition.
The price for our common stock is likely to continue to be volatile and subject to significant
price and volume fluctuations in response to market and other factors, including the other factors
discussed in these risk factors.
Various other factors could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially,
including financial market and general economic changes, changes in governmental regulation,
significant railcar industry announcements or developments, the introduction of new products or
technologies by us or our competitors, and changes in other conditions or trends in our industry or
in the markets of any of our significant customers.
Other factors that could cause our stocks price to fluctuate could be actual or anticipated
variations in our or our competitors quarterly or annual financial results, financial results
failing to meet expectations of analysts or investors, changes in securities analysts estimates of
our future performance or of that of our competitors and the general health and outlook of our
industry.
Our stock price may decline due to sales of shares by Mr. Carl C. Icahn and other stockholders.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the perception that these sales may occur, may
adversely affect the price of our common stock and impede our ability to raise capital through the
issuance of equity securities in the future. Of our outstanding shares of common stock,
approximately 54.4% are beneficially owned by our principal beneficial stockholder and the chairman
of our board of directors, Mr. Carl C. Icahn.
Certain stockholders are contractually entitled, subject to certain exceptions, to exercise their
demand registration rights to register their shares under the Securities Act. If this right is
exercised, holders of any of our common stock subject to these agreements will be entitled to
participate in such registration. By exercising their registration rights, and selling a large
number of shares, these holders could cause the price of our common stock to decline. Approximately
11.3 million shares of common stock are covered by such registration rights.
Mr. Carl C. Icahn exerts significant influence over us and his interests may conflict with the
interest of our other stockholders.
Mr. Carl C. Icahn controls approximately 54.4% of the voting power of our capital stock and is able
to control or exert substantial influence over us, including the election of our directors and
controlling most matters requiring board or shareholder approval, including business strategies,
mergers, business combinations, acquisitions or dispositions of significant assets, issuances of
common stock, incurrence of debt or other financing and the payment of dividends. The existence of
a controlling stockholder may have the effect of making it difficult for, or may discourage or
delay, a third party from seeking to acquire, a majority of our outstanding common stock, which may
adversely affect the market price of our stock.
Mr. Carl C. Icahn owns, controls and has an interest in a wide array of companies, some of which,
such as ARL and ACF as described below, may compete directly or indirectly with us. As a result,
his interests may not always be consistent with our interests or the interests of our other
stockholders. For example, ARL, a railcar leasing company owned by Mr. Carl C. Icahn, competes
directly with our other customers that are in the railcar leasing business and ACF, which supplies
us with critical components, also provides components to our competitors. ACF also is currently
manufacturing railcars for us. Mr. Carl C. Icahn and entities controlled by him may also pursue
acquisitions or business opportunities that may be complementary to our business. Our certificate
of incorporation allows Mr. Carl C. Icahn, entities controlled by him, and any director, officer,
member, partner, stockholder or employee of Mr. Carl C. Icahn or entities controlled by him, to
take advantage of such corporate opportunities
without first presenting such opportunities to us, unless such opportunities are expressly offered
to any such party solely in, and as a direct result of, his or her capacity as our director,
officer or employee. As a result, corporate opportunities that may benefit us may not be available
to us in a timely manner, or at all. To the extent that conflicts of interest may arise between us
and Mr. Carl C. Icahn and his affiliates, those conflicts may be resolved in a manner adverse to us
or you.
22
We are a controlled company within the meaning of the NASDAQ Global Market rules and therefore we
are not subject to all of the NASDAQ Global Market corporate governance requirements.
As we are a controlled company within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the
NASDAQ Global Market, we have elected, as permitted by those rules, not to comply with certain
governance requirements. For example, our board of directors does not have a majority of
independent directors, our officers compensation is not determined by our independent directors,
and director nominees are not selected or recommended by a majority of independent directors. As a
result, we do not have a majority of independent directors and we do not have a nominating
committee nor do we have a compensation committee consisting of independent members.
Payments of cash dividends on our common stock may be made only at the discretion of our board of
directors and may be restricted by Delaware law. Our revolving credit facility, as amended, and our
senior unsecured notes, contain provisions that limit our ability to pay dividends.
Our board of directors may, at its discretion, refuse to declare future dividends depending upon
our operating results, strategic plans, capital requirements, financial condition, provisions of
our borrowing arrangements and other factors our board of directors considers relevant. In
addition, our revolving credit facility and senior unsecured notes restrict our ability to declare
and pay dividends on our capital stock. Furthermore, Delaware law imposes restrictions on our
ability to pay dividends. Accordingly, we may not be able to pay dividends in any given amount in
the future, or at all.
Item 1B: Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item 2: Properties
Our headquarters is located in St. Charles, Missouri. ARL leases this facility from a company
controlled by James J. Unger, our president and chief executive officer and a director, and permits
us to occupy it for a sublease fee pursuant to a rental services agreement. Either party may
terminate this agreement on six months notice or by mutual agreement. See Risk factorsRisks
related to our businessIf a sublease provided to us by ARL, an entity controlled by Mr. Carl C.
Icahn, is terminated, we may need to find new headquarters space, which may require us to incur
additional costs.
23
The following table presents information about our railcar manufacturing and components
manufacturing facilities as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
Leased or |
|
Expiration |
Location |
|
Use |
|
Owned |
|
Date |
Paragould, Arkansas
|
|
Railcar manufacturing
|
|
Owned
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marmaduke, Arkansas
|
|
Railcar manufacturing
|
|
Owned
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson, Missouri
|
|
Railcar components manufacturing
|
|
Owned
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kennett, Missouri
|
|
Railcar subassembly and small
components manufacturing
|
|
Owned
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Longview, Texas
|
|
Steel foundry
|
|
Owned
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Charles, Missouri
|
|
Aluminum foundry and machining
|
|
Leased
|
|
2/28/2011 |
The following table presents information about our railcar services facilities as of December 31,
2008 where we provide railcar repair, cleaning, maintenance and other services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
Leased or |
|
Expiration |
|
Location |
|
Owned |
|
Date |
|
Longview, Texas |
|
Owned |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodrich, Texas |
|
Owned |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Kansas City, Missouri |
|
Owned |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennille, Georgia |
|
Owned |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Milton, Pennsylvania |
|
Owned |
|
|
N/A |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bude, Mississippi |
|
Leased |
|
|
4/30/2009 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sarnia, Ontario |
|
Leased |
|
|
10/31/2026 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gonzales, Louisiana |
|
Leased |
|
|
3/31/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
La Porte, Texas |
|
Leased |
|
|
5/31/2010 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green River, Wyoming |
|
Leased |
|
|
12/1/2012 |
(5) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The facility in Milton, Pennsylvania has been idle since 2003. |
|
(2) |
|
The majority of the facility in Bude, Mississippi is subject to a lease from the city that
expires on April 30, 2009. This lease automatically renews on May 1, 2009, for one year, and
contains a termination clause
requiring six months advance notice. We currently intend to remain in this facility. The
remaining portion of the facility in Bude, Mississippi, is subject to a county lease that
expires on February 28, 2014. |
|
(3) |
|
The land this facility is located on is subject to a lease that expires on October 31, 2026
and automatically renews for twenty years. |
|
(4) |
|
We moved into this property June 2008 under a lease that expires on May 31, 2010. In
conjunction with the lease, we also entered into a separate sales contract to purchase the
property at the time the lease expires. |
|
(5) |
|
The land this facility is located on is subject to a lease
from the State. The lease will expire on December 1, 2017. |
24
Item 3: Legal Proceedings
We have been named the defendant in a lawsuit, OCI Chemical Corporation v. American Railcar
Industries, Inc., in which the plaintiff, OCI Chemical Company (OCI), claims we were responsible
for the damage caused by allegedly defective railcars that were manufactured by us. The lawsuit was
filed on September 19, 2005, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri.
Mediation on November 24, 2008, was not successful. Another mediation is scheduled to take place on
March 9, 2009 and trial has been scheduled for April 13, 2009. We believe that we are not
responsible for the damage and have meritorious defenses against such liability. While we believe
it is reasonably possible that this case could result in a loss to us we do not believe there is
sufficient information to estimate the amount of such loss, if any, resulting from the lawsuit.
We have also been named the defendant in a wrongful death lawsuit, Nicole Lerma v. American
Railcar Industries, Inc. The lawsuit was filed on August 17, 2007, in the Circuit Court of Greene
County, Arkansas Civil Division. Mediation on January 6, 2009, was not successful and trial is
scheduled for August 4, 2009. We believe that we are not responsible and have meritorious defenses
against such liability. While we believe it is reasonably possible that this case could result in a
loss to us we do not believe there is sufficient information to estimate the amount of such loss,
if any, resulting from the lawsuit.
We are from time to time party to various other legal proceedings arising out of our business. Such
proceedings, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and
managerial resources. We believe that there are no proceedings pending against us that if the
outcome was unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
PART II
Item 5: Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock has been traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (formerly known as the NASDAQ
National Market) under the symbol ARII since January 20, 2006. There were approximately 13 holders
of record of common stock as of February 27, 2009 including multiple beneficial holders at
depositories, banks and brokers listed as a single holder of record in the street name of each
respective depository, bank or broker.
25
Our common stock has been publicly traded since January 20, 2006. The following table shows the
price range of our common stock by quarter for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008 |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
25.51 |
|
|
$ |
15.81 |
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
22.28 |
|
|
|
16.78 |
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
23.00 |
|
|
|
15.04 |
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
15.63 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007 |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
34.36 |
|
|
$ |
26.80 |
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
43.46 |
|
|
|
29.03 |
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
42.31 |
|
|
|
20.30 |
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
24.08 |
|
|
|
12.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
36.94 |
|
|
$ |
23.40 |
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
40.96 |
|
|
|
25.82 |
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
33.47 |
|
|
|
26.32 |
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
34.48 |
|
|
|
27.40 |
|
Dividend Policy and Restrictions
Our board of directors declared cash dividends of $0.03 per share in every quarter of 2008, 2007
and 2006. We currently intend to continue to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the future.
However, any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the discretion of our board of
directors and will depend upon our operating results, strategic plans, capital requirements,
financial condition, provisions of our borrowing arrangements and other factors our board of
directors considers relevant. Additionally, our revolving credit facility, as amended, and our
indenture relating to our senior notes due 2014 contain certain covenants that may restrict our
payments of dividends if certain conditions are present. See discussion of our long-term debt
covenants in Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
26
Performance Graph
The following Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed soliciting material
or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be
incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference into such filing.
The following graph illustrates the cumulative total stockholder return on our Common Stock during
the period from January 20, 2006, the date our Common Stock began trading on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market, through December 31, 2008, and compares it with the cumulative total return on the
NASDAQ Composite Index and DJ Transportation Index. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on
January 20, 2006, in our Common Stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment
of dividends, if any. The performance shown is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
27
Item 6: Selected Consolidated Financial Data.
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data for the periods presented.
The consolidated statements of operations and cash flow data as of and for the years ended December
31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere
in this annual report. The consolidated statements of operations and cash flow data for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 are derived from our historical consolidated financial statements not included in
this filing. See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 (8) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Consolidated statement of operations data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing operations (1) |
|
$ |
757,505 |
|
|
$ |
648,124 |
|
|
$ |
597,913 |
|
|
$ |
564,513 |
|
|
$ |
316,432 |
|
Railcar services (2) |
|
|
51,301 |
|
|
|
50,003 |
|
|
|
48,139 |
|
|
|
43,647 |
|
|
|
38,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
808,806 |
|
|
|
698,127 |
|
|
|
646,052 |
|
|
|
608,160 |
|
|
|
355,056 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing operations |
|
|
(682,744 |
) |
|
|
(568,023 |
) |
|
|
(537,344 |
) |
|
|
(518,063 |
) |
|
|
(306,283 |
) |
Railcar services (3) |
|
|
(41,653 |
) |
|
|
(41,040 |
) |
|
|
(38,020 |
) |
|
|
(38,041 |
) |
|
|
(34,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
(724,397 |
) |
|
|
(609,063 |
) |
|
|
(575,364 |
) |
|
|
(556,104 |
) |
|
|
(340,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
84,409 |
|
|
|
89,064 |
|
|
|
70,688 |
|
|
|
52,056 |
|
|
|
14,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income related to insurance
recoveries, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on asset conversion, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and other (4) |
|
|
(26,535 |
) |
|
|
(27,379 |
) |
|
|
(28,399 |
) |
|
|
(25,354 |
) |
|
|
(10,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
57,874 |
|
|
|
61,685 |
|
|
|
56,558 |
|
|
|
26,702 |
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
Interest income (5) |
|
|
7,835 |
|
|
|
13,829 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
Interest expense (6) |
|
|
(20,299 |
) |
|
|
(17,027 |
) |
|
|
(1,372 |
) |
|
|
(4,846 |
) |
|
|
(3,667 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
3,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from joint venture |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
(609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax expense |
|
|
49,785 |
|
|
|
59,368 |
|
|
|
55,956 |
|
|
|
24,124 |
|
|
|
4,112 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(18,403 |
) |
|
|
(22,104 |
) |
|
|
(20,752 |
) |
|
|
(9,356 |
) |
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
31,382 |
|
|
$ |
37,264 |
|
|
$ |
35,204 |
|
|
$ |
14,768 |
|
|
$ |
1,921 |
|
Less preferred dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(13,251 |
) |
|
|
(13,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) available to
common shareholders |
|
$ |
31,382 |
|
|
$ |
37,264 |
|
|
$ |
34,636 |
|
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
|
$ |
(11,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding-basic (7) |
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
|
21,274 |
|
|
|
20,667 |
|
|
|
11,147 |
|
|
|
10,143 |
|
Net earnings (loss) per common
share-basic (7) |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
(1.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding-diluted (7) |
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
|
21,357 |
|
|
|
20,733 |
|
|
|
11,147 |
|
|
|
10,143 |
|
Net earnings
(loss) per common
share-diluted (7) |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
(1.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheet data (at year end): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
291,788 |
|
|
$ |
303,882 |
|
|
$ |
40,922 |
|
|
$ |
28,692 |
|
|
$ |
6,943 |
|
Net working capital |
|
|
376,106 |
|
|
|
380,111 |
|
|
|
126,086 |
|
|
|
25,768 |
|
|
|
46,565 |
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
206,936 |
|
|
|
175,166 |
|
|
|
130,293 |
|
|
|
92,985 |
|
|
|
76,951 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
679,654 |
|
|
|
654,384 |
|
|
|
338,926 |
|
|
|
268,580 |
|
|
|
356,840 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
364,929 |
|
|
|
363,396 |
|
|
|
88,746 |
|
|
|
161,820 |
|
|
|
221,817 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
314,725 |
|
|
|
290,988 |
|
|
|
250,180 |
|
|
|
106,760 |
|
|
|
135,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated cash flow data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
44,322 |
|
|
$ |
60,230 |
|
|
$ |
29,967 |
|
|
$ |
41,571 |
|
|
$ |
(17,082 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(53,812 |
) |
|
|
(67,434 |
) |
|
|
(51,704 |
) |
|
|
(22,580 |
) |
|
|
(11,037 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities |
|
|
(2,604 |
) |
|
|
270,164 |
|
|
|
33,967 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
34,997 |
|
28
You should read this information together with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial statements and the related
notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes revenues from transactions with affiliates of $182.8 million, $140.2 million, $50.0
million, $47.2 million and $64.4 million in 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes revenues from transactions with affiliates of $15.3 million, $16.0 million, $18.9
million, $20.6 million and $19.4 million in 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
2005 includes $2.0 million charge for pension settlement. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes costs from transactions with affiliates of $0.6 million, $0.6 million, $2.0 million,
$2.0 million and $0.7 million in 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. 2005 includes
$8.9 million charge for pension settlement. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes interest income from affiliates of less than $0.1 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006 and
$1.0 million and $3.9 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes interest expense to affiliates of zero, zero, $0.1 million, $2.1 million and $1.5
million in 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
|
(7) |
|
Share and per share data has been restated to give effect to the merger of ARI and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, American Railcar Industries, Inc. the surviving entity. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes the acquisition of Custom Steel effective as of March 31, 2006, which provided cost
savings during 2006 within our cost of revenue manufacturing operations. |
Item 7: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with Selected Consolidated Financial Data
and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this annual report. This
discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on managements current expectations,
estimates and projections about our business and operations. Our actual results may differ
materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements,
including as a result of the factors we describe under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this annual
report. See Special note regarding forward-looking statements appearing at the beginning of this
report and Risk Factors set forth in Item 1A of this report.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading North American designer and manufacturer of hopper and tank railcars. We also
repair and refurbish railcars, provide fleet management services and design and manufacture certain
railcar and industrial components. We provide our railcar customers with integrated solutions
through a comprehensive set of high quality products and related services.
We operate in two segments: manufacturing operations and railcar services. Manufacturing operations
consist of railcar manufacturing as well as railcar and industrial component manufacturing. Railcar
services consist of railcar repair and refurbishment services and fleet management services.
During 2008, we experienced favorable labor efficiencies and overhead cost control at most of our
locations including our tank railcar manufacturing complex that includes our flexible railcar
manufacturing plant. The additional manufacturing capacity provided by this new flexible plant
along with the manufacturing agreement with ACF led to increased tank railcar shipments for us in
2008 compared to 2007. ACF is an affiliate of Mr. Carl Icahn,
our principal beneficial stockholder and the chairman of our board of directors. Our railcar
services group performed well in 2008 due to a favorable mix of work.
The recent worldwide financial turmoil and associated economic downturn has adversely affected
sales of our railcars and other products and caused us to slow our production rates. We believe
restricted credit markets may be making it more costly for purchasers of railcars to obtain
financing on reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, the slow-down of the United States economy
has reduced and may continue to reduce requirements for the transport of products carried by the
railcars we manufacture. These factors have resulted in and may continue to result in decreased
demand and increased pricing pressures on the sales of railcars and railcar components. Sales of
other of our industrial products have been and may continue to be adversely affected by the
slow-down in industrial output, as well.
29
Given the economic downturn, the railcar industry has weakened and we expect industry railcar
shipments to decline in 2009 from 2008. We also expect our shipments and revenues to decrease in
2009 from 2008.
FACTORS AFFECTING OPERATING RESULTS
The following is a discussion of some of the key factors that have in the past and could in the
future to affect our operating results. These factors include, but are not limited to, the cyclical
nature of the North American railcar market, our reliance on a few customers for most of our
revenues, our experience with customer order frequency and size, revenues from our affiliates
representing a significant portion of our revenue and fluctuation in supplies and prices of raw
materials and components used in railcar manufacturing. See Risk Factors for a more comprehensive
list of factors that could affect our operating results.
Cyclicality of the railcar industry and effect of economic conditions
Historically, the North American railcar market has been and we expect it to continue to be highly
cyclical. For example, we have experienced a decrease in demand and an increase in pricing
pressures in the tank and hopper railcar markets as well as downturns and decreased demand in all
of the railcar manufacturing industry. In addition, there has been a global economic downturn,
which has resulted and may continue to result in lower sales volumes, lower prices for railcars and
a loss of profits for us, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to convert our
railcar backlog into revenues.
Customer concentration
Railcars are typically sold pursuant to large, periodic orders, and a limited number of customers
typically represent a significant percentage of our railcar sales in any given year. The loss of
any significant portion of our sales to any major customer, the loss of a single major customer or
a material adverse change in the financial condition of any one of our major customers could have a
material adverse effect on our business and financial results. As of December 31, 2008, we fully
reserved for all outstanding invoices due to us from one railcar services customer that filed
bankruptcy on January 6, 2009, totaling $0.5 million. We continue to provide services to this
customer with shortened payment terms. This customer represented 0.6% of total consolidated
revenues for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Customer order size and frequency
Many of our customers place orders for railcars on an as-needed basis, sometimes only once every
few years. As a result, the order levels for railcars, the mix of railcar types ordered and the
railcars ordered by any particular customer have varied significantly from quarter to quarter in
the past and may continue to vary significantly in the future. As railcar sales comprised 86.0%,
83.5% and 83.1%, respectively, of our total consolidated revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006, our
results of operations in any particular period may be significantly affected by the number of
railcars and the product mix of railcars we deliver in that period.
Revenues from affiliates
In 2008, 2007 and 2006, our revenues from affiliates accounted for 24.5%, 22.4% and 10.7% of our
total consolidated revenues, respectively. These affiliates consisted of entities beneficially
owned and controlled by Mr. Carl C. Icahn, the chairman of our board of directors and our principal
controlling stockholder. We believe that revenues from affiliates will continue to constitute an
important portion of our business. A significant reduction in sales to affiliates could have a
material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
30
Raw material costs
The price for steel, the primary raw material used in the manufacture of our railcars, has in the
past and may in the future vary as a result of worldwide demand, limited availability of production
inputs for steel, including scrap metal, industry consolidation and import trade barriers. These
factors could also cause a corresponding increase or decrease in the cost and availability of
castings and other railcar components constructed with steel. Costs for other railcar manufacturers
could be similarly affected by the availability and pricing of steel and castings and other
components.
Component supply constraints
Our business depends on the adequate supply of numerous specialty components, such as railcar
wheels, brakes, sideframes, axles, bearings, yokes, bolsters and other heavy castings as well as
specialized raw materials, such as normalized steel plates used in the production of railcars. If
our suppliers of railcar components and raw materials were to stop or reduce their production, go
out of business, refuse to continue their business relationships with us, reduce the amounts they
are willing to sell to us or become subject to work stoppages, our business would be disrupted.
This could materially and adversely affect our operating results. Our ability to continue or
increase our railcar production depends on our ability to obtain an adequate supply of these
railcar components and raw materials.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table summarizes our historical operations as a percentage of revenues for the
periods shown. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of operating results that may
be expected in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing operations |
|
|
93.7 |
% |
|
|
92.8 |
% |
|
|
92.5 |
% |
Railcar services |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing operations |
|
|
(84.4 |
%) |
|
|
(81.4 |
%) |
|
|
(83.2 |
%) |
Railcar services |
|
|
(5.2 |
%) |
|
|
(5.9 |
%) |
|
|
(5.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
(89.6 |
%) |
|
|
(87.3 |
%) |
|
|
(89.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
Income related to insurance
recoveries, net |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Gain on asset conversion, net |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Selling, administrative and other
expenses |
|
|
(3.3 |
%) |
|
|
(3.9 |
%) |
|
|
(4.4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(2.5 |
%) |
|
|
(2.4 |
%) |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
Other income |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Income (loss) from joint venture |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax expense |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(2.3 |
%) |
|
|
(3.2 |
%) |
|
|
(3.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 compared to year ended December 31, 2007
Revenues
Our revenues in 2008 increased 15.9% to $808.8 million from $698.1 million in 2007. This increase
was attributable to an increase in revenues from both manufacturing operations and railcar
services.
31
Our manufacturing operations revenues increased 16.9% to $757.5 million in 2008 from $648.1 million
in 2007. This increase was partially attributable to the delivery of 910 more railcars in 2008
compared to 2007. The increase in shipments reflects the completion of our Marmaduke expansion
efforts and additional tank railcars shipped under our ACF manufacturing contract, partially offset
by the decline in hopper railcar shipments in 2008, due to less demand and increased competition
for hopper railcar products. Manufacturing operations revenues also increased due to higher selling
prices on most railcars caused by increases in raw materials prices that we were able to pass on to
most of our customers. During 2008, we shipped 7,965 railcars compared to 7,055 railcars in 2007.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized revenue of $100.3 million related to railcars
that were manufactured under the ACF manufacturing agreement. This agreement will terminate on the later of the completion of 1,388 tank railcars or March 23, 2009.
In 2008, our manufacturing operations revenues included $182.8 million, or 22.6% of our total
consolidated revenues, from transactions with affiliates, compared to $140.2 million, or 20.1% of
our total consolidated revenues, in 2007. These revenues were attributable to sales of railcars and
railcar parts to companies controlled by Mr. Carl C. Icahn.
Our railcar services revenues increased 2.6% to $51.3 million in 2008 from $50.0 million in 2007.
This increase was primarily attributable to strong railcar repair demand. In 2008, our railcar
services revenues included $15.3 million, or 1.9% of our total consolidated revenues, from
transactions with affiliates, as compared to $16.0 million, or 2.3%, in 2007.
ARI has had a reduction in its scope of fleet management services that it is providing to ARL.
Since ARL split from ARI in 2005, ARL has and continues to reduce these services. This reduction
has not affected the repair and maintenance services that ARI provides to ARL. The Company does not
anticipate this reduction to have a material impact on its railcar services revenue.
Gross profit
Our gross profit decreased to $84.4 million in 2008 from $89.1 million in 2007. Our gross profit
margin decreased to 10.4% in 2008 from 12.7% in 2007. The decrease in overall gross profit margin
was primarily driven by a decrease in gross profit margins in our manufacturing operations.
Our gross profit margin for our manufacturing operations decreased to 9.9% in 2008 from 12.4% in
2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to lower margins on
hopper railcars as a result of competitive market conditions and increased material costs and surcharges on some hopper railcars that we could not recover through
higher selling prices on fixed price contracts. The increased material costs and surcharges that we
were able to recover through increased selling prices on most railcars had a negative effect on
gross profit margin, because we did not realize additional profit from these recoveries. Partially
offsetting these costs were higher tank railcar shipments in 2008 along with favorable labor
efficiencies and overhead cost control at our manufacturing facilities.
Our gross profit margin for railcar services increased to 18.8% in 2008 from 17.9% in 2007. This
increase was primarily attributable to labor efficiencies, increased capacity and a favorable mix
of work.
Selling, administrative and other expenses
Our selling, administrative and other expenses decreased by $0.9 million in 2008 to $26.5 million
from $27.4 million in 2007. These selling, administrative and other expenses, which include stock
based compensation, were 3.3% of total consolidated revenues in 2008 as compared to 3.9% of total
consolidated revenues in 2007.
The decrease of $0.9 million was primarily attributable to a decrease in stock based compensation
expense of $1.9 million resulting from decreased stock appreciation rights (SARs) expense driven by
our lower stock price levels in 2008, which negatively affected the fair value of the SARs. In
addition, income was recognized in 2008 from the reversal of expense for forfeited stock options.
The decrease in stock based compensation expense was partially offset by an increase in various
other expenses in 2008 amounting to $1.0 million mainly driven by increases in travel and other
costs related to our recently formed joint venture and depreciation expense related to recently
completed projects.
32
Interest expense and interest income
Net interest expense for 2008 was $12.5 million, representing $7.8 million of interest income and
$20.3 million of interest expense, as compared to $3.2 million of net interest expense for 2007,
representing $13.8 million of interest income and $17.0 million of interest expense.
The $3.3 million increase in interest expense from 2007 to 2008 was due to interest expense on our
unsecured senior notes which had an additional two months of interest costs in 2008 compared to
2007.
The $6.0 million decrease in interest income from 2007 to 2008 was primarily attributable to a
decrease in interest rates and a decrease in average cash balances held in 2008 compared to 2007
due to cash invested in available for sale securities. Cash invested in 2007 generated a greater
return than in 2008.
Other Income
During 2008, we purchased shares of The Greenbrier Companies (GBX) common stock and subsequently
sold a portion of that investment resulting in a realized gain of $2.6 million. We also entered
into total return swap agreements referencing 400,000 shares of GBX common stock. During July and
August of 2008, all of these total return swap agreements were settled for a realized gain of $0.6
million.
We also experienced gains on an option to purchase Canadian Dollars which resulted in $0.1 million
unrealized gain and $0.1 million realized gain at December 31, 2008.
Income from joint ventures
Income from joint ventures decreased from $0.9 million in 2007 to $0.7 million in 2008 due to
fluctuations in Ohio Castings and Axis net income/loss. Axis reported a net loss in 2008, of which
our share was $1.1 million and Ohio Castings reported net income, of which our share was $1.8
million. In 2007, Axis reported a net loss of less than $0.1 million and Ohio Castings reported net
income, of which our share was $0.7 million.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense for 2008 was $18.4 million, or 37.0% of our earnings before income taxes, as
compared to $22.1 million for 2007, or 37.2% of our earnings before income taxes.
Year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006
Revenues
Our revenues in 2007 increased 8.1% to $698.1 million from $646.1 million in 2006. This increase
was attributable to an increase in revenues from both manufacturing operations and railcar
services.
Our manufacturing operations revenues increased 8.4% to $648.1 million in 2007 from $597.9 million
in 2006. This increase was partially attributable to the delivery of 108 more railcars in 2007
compared to 2006, when shipments were reduced due to the shutdown from the tornado damage to the
Marmaduke facility. The increase in shipments reflects the restart of our Marmaduke operations, the
expansion of our Marmaduke complex and additional tank railcars shipped under our ACF manufacturing
contract, partially offset by the decline in hopper railcar shipments ordered for delivery in 2007,
due to less demand and increased competition for hopper railcar products during that period. During
2007, we shipped 7,055 railcars compared to 6,947 railcars in 2006. In the year ended December 31,
2007, we recognized revenue of $17.3 million related to railcars that were manufactured under the
ACF manufacturing agreement.
33
In 2007, our manufacturing operations revenues included $140.2 million, or 20.1% of our total
consolidated revenues, from transactions with affiliates, compared to $50.0 million, or 7.7% of our
total consolidated revenues, in 2006. These revenues were attributable to sales of railcars and
railcar parts to companies controlled by Mr. Carl C. Icahn.
Our railcar services revenues increased 3.9% to $50.0 million in 2007 from $48.2 million in 2006.
This increase was primarily attributable to strong railcar repair demand. In 2007, our railcar
services revenues included $16.0 million, or 2.3% of our total consolidated revenues, from
transactions with affiliates, as compared to $18.9 million, or 2.9%, in 2006.
Gross profit
Our gross profit increased to $89.1 million in 2007 from $70.7 million in 2006. Our 2006 gross
profit was negatively impacted by the shutdown of our Marmaduke facility due to the tornado, for
which we recovered $9.9 million for lost profits under our business interruption insurance policy.
Our gross profit margin increased to 12.7% in 2007 from 10.9% in 2006. The increase in our gross
profit margin was primarily attributable to an increase in our gross profit margin for our
manufacturing operations.
Our gross profit margin for our manufacturing operations increased to 12.4% in 2007 from 10.1% in
2006. This increase was primarily attributable to railcar mix, including significantly more tank
railcars, and improved manufacturing efficiencies that we experienced during 2007 compared to 2006.
Labor efficiencies resulted from lean manufacturing initiatives and enhanced training initiatives
at our railcar manufacturing facilities.
Our gross profit margin for railcar services decreased to 17.9% in 2007 from 21.0% in 2006. This
decrease was primarily attributable to mix of work content at our repair plants and higher costs
for various railcar services in 2007.
Income Related to Insurance Recoveries, Net and Gain on Asset Conversion, Net
On April 2, 2006, our Marmaduke, Arkansas tank railcar manufacturing complex was damaged by a
tornado. We were covered by property insurance covering wind and rain damage to our property,
incremental costs and operating expenses we incurred due to the tornado damage at our Marmaduke
complex. In addition, we were covered by insurance for business interruption as a direct result of
the insured damage.
Our deductibles on these policies are $0.1 million for property insurance and a five-day equivalent
time element business interruption deductible, which resulted in $0.6 million. The final property
damage claim settlement amounted to $11.2 million, prior to application of the deductible, and the
final business interruption insurance settlement amounted to $16.0 million, prior to application of
the deductible.
During 2006, we identified assets with net book value of $4.3 million that were damaged or
destroyed by the tornado. The charge for these asset write-offs was netted against the net
insurance settlement of $11.1 million related to the property damage insurance claim to arrive at
the gain on asset conversion, net. Other costs amounting to $2.4 million were incurred related to
clean up costs and various miscellaneous repairs associated with the storm damage.
34
The tornado related insurance settlement for the property damage claim includes $11.1 million in
cash proceeds received during 2006 to provide funds to clean up and repair the plant in Marmaduke
as well as order replacement
assets so the plant was operational in a timely manner. These cash advances are classified as cash
provided for investing activities and as cash provided by operating activities as they were
received as part of the property insurance claim that was filed for all the property, plant and
equipment as well as inventory that were damaged by the tornado. As we agreed on a final settlement
amount with our insurance carrier, we wrote off the assets and recorded the actual net gain
attributable to the storm from the replacement of the property with new property and equipment. We
recognized the gain on the replacement of property damaged or destroyed of $4.3 million as gain on
asset conversion in the statement of operations computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property damage insurance claim |
|
$ |
11,160 |
|
Property damage claim deductible |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property damage insurance settlement, net |
|
|
11,060 |
|
Assets damaged, clean up costs, repair costs |
|
|
(6,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on asset conversion, net |
|
$ |
4,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
Our business interruption insurance policy and the final settlement provided coverage for
continuing expenses, employee wages and the loss of profits resulting from the temporary Marmaduke
plant shut-down caused by the storm. We received cash proceeds amounting to $15.4 million during
2006 related to the business interruption insurance claim.
We recognized income related to insurance recoveries in the statement of operations of $9.9 million
attributable to our business interruption insurance computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business interruption insurance claim |
|
$ |
15,968 |
|
Business interruption claim deductible |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Business interruption insurance settlement, net |
|
|
15,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing expenses |
|
|
(5,430 |
) |
Deductible adjustment |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income related to insurance recoveries, net |
|
$ |
9,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and other expenses
Our selling, administrative and other expenses decreased by $1.0 million in 2007 to $27.4 million
from $28.4 million in 2006. These selling, administrative and other expenses, which include stock
based compensation, were 3.9% of total consolidated revenues in 2007 as compared to 4.4% of total
consolidated revenues in 2006.
The decrease of $1.0 million was primarily attributable to a stock based compensation expense
decrease of $6.2 million (as described below), largely offset by an increase of $5.2 million of
selling, administrative and other costs including legal costs, information technology costs and
increased headcount to support our growing business.
Our stock based compensation expense for 2007 was $1.9 million. This expense is attributable to
restricted stock and stock options we granted in 2006 and to stock appreciation rights (SARs),
which settle in cash, granted in 2007. This is compared to stock based compensation expense of
$8.1 million for 2006, which included $5.7 million in connection with the granting of restricted
stock in conjunction with our initial public offering.
Interest expense and interest income
Net interest expense for 2007 was $3.2 million, representing $13.8 million of interest income and
$17.0 million of interest expense, as compared to $0.1 million of net interest income for 2006,
representing $1.5 million of interest income and $1.4 million of interest expense.
35
The $15.6 million increase in interest expense from 2006 to 2007 was due to having minimal debt
outstanding throughout most of 2006, due to the repayment in January 2006 of substantially all of
our then outstanding debt with a portion of the net proceeds from our initial public offering in
January 2006, combined with $16.0 million of interest expense in 2007 due to the sale of
$275.0 million of unsecured senior notes due 2014 in February 2007.
The $12.3 million increase in interest income from 2006 to 2007 was primarily attributable to the
investment of the net proceeds we received in connection with the issuance of our unsecured senior
notes and the investment of cash generated through operations.
Income (loss) from joint venture
Income from joint venture for 2007 was $0.9 million compared to a loss from joint venture of $0.7
million for 2006, representing an improvement in earnings of $1.6 million. In 2006, Ohio Castings
incurred a significant charge related to a reserve of $3.7 million ($1.2 million being ARIs share
of that charge) related to defective castings that were produced by one of the Ohio Castings
facilities over an identified time period.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense for 2007 was $22.1 million, or 37.2% of our earnings before income taxes, as
compared to $20.8 million for 2006, or 37.1% of our earnings before income taxes.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of December 31, 2008, we had net working capital of $376.1 million, including $291.8 million of
cash and cash equivalents. Our cash position at December 31, 2008 consists of cash proceeds from
senior unsecured notes issued in February 2007 and cash generated from operations. We also have a
$100.0 million revolving credit facility with Capital One Leverage Finance Corporation, as
administrative agent for various lenders.
Outstanding and Available Debt
Senior unsecured notes
In February 2007, we issued $275.0 million of senior unsecured fixed rate notes, which were
subsequently exchanged for registered notes in March 2007. The offering resulted in net proceeds to
us of approximately $270.7 million. The terms of the notes contain restrictive covenants, including
limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, issue disqualified or preferred stock, make
certain restricted payments and enter into certain significant transactions with shareholders and
affiliates. These limitations become more restrictive if our fixed charge coverage ratio, as
defined, is less than 2.0 to 1.0. As of December 31, 2008, and for the year then ended, we were in
compliance with all of our covenants under the notes.
ARI may redeem up to 35.0% of the notes, prior to or on March 1, 2010, at a redemption price of
107.5% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest with money that the Company
raises from one or more qualified equity offerings. Prior to March 1, 2011, the notes may be
redeemed in whole or in part at a redemption price equal to 100.0% of the applicable principal
amount, plus an applicable premium as defined in the notes agreement, plus accrued and unpaid
interest. Commencing on March 1, 2011, the redemption price is set at 103.8% of the principal
amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, and declines annually until it is reduced to
100.0% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest after March 1, 2013.
Revolving credit facility
Our credit facility has a limit of $100.0 million through Capital One Leverage Finance Corporation,
as administrative agent for various lenders. The terms of this facility contain restrictive
covenants on, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness, modify our current
governing documents, sell or dispose of collateral, grant credit and declare or pay dividends or
make distributions on common stock or other equity securities. This facility is described in
further detail in Note 14 of our Consolidated Financial Statements, and provides for relief from
certain financial covenants described in that note so long as we maintain excess availability of at
least $30.0 million. As of December 31, 2008, and for the
year then ended, we were in compliance
with these covenants.
36
At December 31, 2008, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility and $80.0 million of
availability based upon the amount of our eligible accounts receivable and inventory (without
regard to any financial covenants). If we were able to maintain excess availability of at least
$30.0 million, our availability would be $50.0 million. We currently intend to obtain a new credit
facility effective upon the current agreements expiration in October 2009. We cannot guarantee
that we will be able to obtain such a facility or other new financing on favorable terms, if at
all.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities are affected by several factors, including fluctuations in
business volume, contract terms for billings and collections, the timing of collections on our
accounts receivables, processing of payroll and associated taxes and payments to our suppliers.
Our net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was
$44.3 million. Net earnings of $31.4 million were impacted by the non-cash items including but not
limited to depreciation and amortization expense of $21.0 million, joint venture earnings of $0.7
million, an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts reserve of $0.7 million and other
smaller adjustments.
Cash provided by operating activities attributable to changes in our current assets and liabilities
included an increase in accrued expenses and taxes of $2.1 million. Cash used in operating
activities included an increase in inventory of $3.8 million, a decrease of $3.4 million in
accounts payable (including those to affiliates) and a decrease in other of $0.5 million.
The increase in accrued expenses and taxes was primarily due to increased accrued taxes at December
31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007. The increase in inventories was primarily due to increased
material prices at
December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007. The decrease in accounts payable is primarily due
to production slowdowns and the timing of payments for the period ending December 31, 2008 compared
to the period ending December 31, 2007.
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $53.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. This
amount includes $52.4 million of purchases of property, plant and equipment, a $0.7 million
contribution to our Axis joint venture, a $1.9 million cash inflow from the sale of a portion of
our interest in our Axis joint venture and net cash outflow of $4.3 million from our investment
activity in the common stock of GBX. The capital expenditures were primarily for the purchase of
equipment at multiple locations to increase capacity and operating efficiencies. Some of these
purchases are described in further detail below under Capital Expenditures. The cash outflow
related to our investment in the common stock of GBX resulted from our January 2008 purchase of
1,530,000 shares of GBX common stock for $27.9 million and our subsequent sale of 1,156,659 of
these shares during the second and third quarters of 2008 for proceeds of $23.6 million.
In addition to purchasing shares of GBX common stock, we also entered into total return swap
agreements that referenced 400,000 shares of common stock of Greenbrier in January 2008. The total
notional amount of these swap agreements was approximately $7.4 million, which represented the fair
market value of the referenced shares at the time we entered into the agreements. During July and
August 2008, all of the Companys total return swap agreements were settled in accordance with the
terms of the agreements. The settlement of the total return swap agreements resulted in a realized
gain of $0.6 million.
From time to time, we may invest in marketable securities, or derivatives thereof, including higher
risk equity securities and high yield debt instruments. These securities are subject to general
credit, liquidity, market risks and interest rate fluctuations that have affected various sectors
of the financial markets and caused overall tightening of the credit markets and the decline in the
stock markets. The market risks associated with any investments we may make may have a negative
adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
37
Our investments at any given time also may become highly concentrated within a particular company,
industry, asset category, trading style or financial or economic market. In that event, our
investment portfolio will be more susceptible to fluctuations in value resulting from adverse
economic conditions affecting the performance of that particular company, industry, asset category,
trading style or economic market than a less concentrated portfolio would be. As a result, our
investment portfolio could become concentrated and its aggregate return may be volatile and may be
affected substantially by the performance of only one or a few holdings.
As of December 31, 2008, we had $2.6 million of short-term investments. In addition, during
January and February 2009, we paid $20.2 million to invest in corporate bonds that mature in 2015
with interest payments semi-annually. If the note issuer is unable to repay these notes, it could
materially adversely affect our financial results and future liquidity.
Capital expenditures
We continuously evaluate facility requirements based on our strategic plans, production
requirements and market demand and may elect to change our level of capital investments in the
future. These investments are all based on an analysis of the rates of return and impact on our
profitability. We are pursuing opportunities to reduce our costs through continued vertical
integration of component parts. From time to time, we may expand our business, domestically or
abroad, by acquiring other businesses or pursuing other strategic growth opportunities including,
without limitation, joint ventures.
Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $52.4 million, including costs that
were capitalized related to maintenance, repair and replacement of existing assets and facilities,
improvements for cost reduction purposes, expansion activities and costs associated with assets
transferred from inventory to property, plant and equipment during the year.
Most of our significant capital projects were completed in 2008. The new Marmaduke flexible railcar
manufacturing plant expansion, which is capable of producing tank, hopper and other railcar types,
was completed in early 2008 and has begun producing railcars. Our wheel and axle assembly shop and
our tank head press facility were also completed during 2008 and have begun production.
Future Liquidity
Our future liquidity includes our existing cash balance of $291.8 million and our forecasted cash
flow for 2009. We expect our future cash flows from operations to be impacted by pricing pressures,
the number of railcar orders, productions rates and number of railcar shipments along with the
state of the credit markets and the overall economy. We believe that these sources of funds will
provide sufficient liquidity to meet our expected operating requirements over the next twelve
months.
Our long-term liquidity is contingent upon future operating performance and our ability to continue
to meet financial covenants under our indenture and our revolving credit facility and any other
indebtedness. We may also require additional capital in the future to fund capital expenditures,
acquisitions or other investments. These capital requirements could be substantial. Our operating
performance may also be affected by matters discussed under Risk Factors, and trends and
uncertainties discussed in this discussion and analysis, including those factors discussed under
Factors Affecting Operating Results, as well as elsewhere in this annual report. These risks,
trends and uncertainties may also materially adversely affect our long-term liquidity.
For 2009, our current capital expenditure plans include approximately $38.0 million of projects
that we expect will maintain equipment, expand capacity, improve efficiencies or reduce costs, as
well as fund investments in joint ventures. These capital expenditure plans include expenditures to
further integrate our supply chain and various capital expenditures related to 2008 projects that
have carried over into 2009. The amount set forth above is an estimate only. We cannot assure that
we will be able to complete any of our projects on a timely basis or within budget, if at all.
38
Other potential projects, including possible strategic acquisitions that could complement and
expand our business units, will be evaluated to determine if the project or opportunity is right
for us. We anticipate that any future expansion of our business will be financed through existing
resources, cash flow from operations, term debt associated directly with that project or other new
financing. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to meet existing financial covenants or obtain
term debt or other new financing on favorable terms, if at all.
Dividends
The board of directors declared regular cash dividends of $0.03 per share of our common stock for
each quarter of 2008, 2007 and 2006. On March 3, 2009, the board of directors declared a cash
dividend of $0.03 per share of our common stock to shareholders of record at the close of business
on March 20, 2009. These dividends are payable on April 2, 2009. We intend to pay cash dividends on
our common stock in the future at the discretion of our board of directors, depending upon our
operating results, strategic plans, capital requirements, financial condition, debt covenants and
other factors.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2008, and the effect
that these obligations and commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in
future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by Period |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
2-3 years |
|
|
4-5 years |
|
|
After 5 years |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Lease Obligations 1 |
|
$ |
5,367 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
3,288 |
|
Purchase Obligations |
|
$ |
8,100 |
|
|
|
7,435 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Unsecured Notes 2 |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
Interest payments on senior unsecured
notes 3 |
|
$ |
113,438 |
|
|
|
20,625 |
|
|
|
41,250 |
|
|
|
41,250 |
|
|
|
10,313 |
|
Fees related
to Revolving Credit Agreement 4 |
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Funding 5 |
|
$ |
7,384 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
Postretirement Funding 6 |
|
$ |
1,149 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
410,771 |
|
|
$ |
29,827 |
|
|
$ |
45,634 |
|
|
$ |
44,474 |
|
|
$ |
290,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The operating lease commitment includes the future minimum rental payments required under
non-cancelable operating leases for property and equipment leased by us. |
|
(2) |
|
On February 28, 2007, we issued $275.0 million of senior unsecured notes that are due on
March 1, 2014. |
|
(3) |
|
The interest rate on these notes is 7.5%. These notes have interest payments due semiannually
on March 1 and September 1 of every year. |
|
(4) |
|
Our revolving credit facility, as amended, permits us to borrow up to $100.0 million, subject
to applicable covenants, until expiration in October 2009. We have no borrowings outstanding
on this revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2008. |
|
(5) |
|
Our pension funding commitments includes minimum funding contributions required by law for
our two funded pension plans as well as expected benefit payments for our one unfunded pension
plan. |
|
(6) |
|
Our postretirement health care benefit plan is unfunded thus the Company must fund benefit
payments. |
The Company has excluded from the contractual obligation table above, its gross amount of
unrecognized tax benefits of $2.1 million. While it is uncertain as to the amount, if any, of these
unrecognized tax benefits that will be settled by means of a cash payment, the Company anticipates
a reduction in the liability within the next year to be in the range of $1.0 million to $1.5
million, as referenced in Note 15 in our Consolidated Financial Statements. This anticipated
reduction is primarily due to the expiration of statute of limitations.
39
We entered into a contract in June 2008 to purchase the land and building of our La Porte, Texas
facility that is currently being leased. The lease expires on May 31, 2010 and at that time, we
will purchase the property for $0.7 million.
In 2005, we entered into two vendor supply contracts with minimum volume commitments with suppliers
of materials used at our railcar production complexes. Our commitments under these agreements are
set to be satisfied in early 2009. We have agreed to purchase a combined total of $65.0 million
from these two suppliers from 2006 through 2009. In 2009, we expect to purchase $3.4 million under
these agreements.
During 2005, we entered into two supply agreements with a steel supplier for the purchase of
certain types of steel plate. The agreements each have terms of five years and may be terminated by
either party at any time after two years, upon twelve months prior notice. Each agreement requires
us to purchase a minimum volume requirement for the steel covered by that agreement at prices that
fluctuate with the market. We have no commitment under these arrangements to buy a minimum amount
of steel, other than the minimum percentages, if our overall steel purchases decline.
In 2006, we entered into an agreement with two parties, including one of the members of the Ohio
Castings joint venture and an affiliate of one of the members of the Ohio Castings joint venture,
to purchase a minimum of 60.0% of certain of our railcar component requirements for the years 2007,
2008 and 2009.
In July 2007, ARI entered into an agreement with its joint venture, Axis, to purchase all of its
requirements of new railcar axles from a facility to be constructed by the joint venture.
Operations are expected to begin the second quarter of 2009.
In 2008, we entered into natural gas contracts that contain fixed price and minimum volume purchase
requirements, with purchase requirements of $0.7 million remaining as of December 31, 2008.
The Company entered into a foreign currency option in October 2008, to purchase Canadian Dollars
(CAD) with U.S. Dollars (USD) from October 2008 through April 2009, with fixed exchange rates and
exchange limits each month. In 2008, we expended $2.0 million USD to purchase CAD under this
option. We have committed to purchase CAD for $3.3 million USD in 2009 to hedge our exposure to
foreign currency exchange risk related to capital expenditures for the expansion of our Canadian
repair operations.
Contingencies
In connection with our investment in Ohio Castings, we have guaranteed bonds amounting to
$10.0 million issued by the State of Ohio to Ohio Castings, of which $3.1 million was outstanding
as of December 31, 2008. We also have a guarantee on a $2.0 million state loan that provides for
purchases of capital equipment, of which $0.9 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2008. The
two other partners of Ohio Castings have made identical guarantees of these obligations.
One of our joint ventures, Axis, LLC, entered into a credit agreement in December 2007. In
connection with this event, we agreed to a 50.0% guaranty of Axis, LLCs obligation under its
credit agreement during the construction and start up phases of the facility. Subject to its terms
and conditions, the Guaranty will terminate on the earlier of (i) the repayment in full of the
guaranteed obligations or (ii) after the facility has been in continuous production at a level
sufficient to meet the facilitys projected financial performance and in any event not less than
365 consecutive days from the certified completion of the facilitys construction. As of December
31, 2008, Axis, LLC had approximately $48.7 million outstanding under the credit agreement. This
guaranty has a maximum exposure related to it of $35.0 million, exclusive of any capitalized
interest, fees, costs and expenses. Our initial partner in the joint venture has provided the same
guarantee relating to this credit agreement.
40
We are subject to comprehensive Federal, state, local and international environmental laws and
regulations relating to the release or discharge of materials into the environment, the management,
use, processing, handling, storage, transport or disposal of hazardous materials and wastes, or
otherwise relating to the protection of human health and the environment. These laws and
regulations not only expose us to liability for the environmental condition of our current or
formerly owned or operated facilities, and our own negligent acts, but also may expose us to
liability for the conduct of others or for our actions that were in compliance with all applicable
laws at the time these actions were taken. In addition, these laws may require significant
expenditures to achieve compliance, and are frequently modified or revised to impose new
obligations. Civil and criminal fines and penalties and other sanctions may be imposed for
non-compliance with these environmental laws and regulations. Our operations that involve hazardous
materials also raise potential risks of liability under common law. We are involved in
investigation and remediation activities at properties that we now own or lease to address
historical contamination and potential contamination by third parties. We are involved with state
agencies in the cleanup of two sites under these laws. These investigations are in process but it
is too early to be able to make a reasonable estimate, with any certainty, of the timing and extent
of remedial actions that may be required, and the costs that would be involved in such remediation.
Substantially all of the issues identified relate to the use of the properties prior to
their transfer to us in 1994 by ACF and for which ACF has retained liability for environmental
contamination that may have existed at the time of transfer to us. ACF has also agreed to indemnify
us for any cost that might be incurred with those existing issues. However, if ACF fails to honor
our obligations to us, we would be responsible for the cost of such remediation. We believe that
our operations and facilities are in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations
and that any noncompliance is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our operations or
financial condition.
We have been named the defendant in a lawsuit, OCI Chemical Corporation v. American Railcar
Industries, Inc., in which the plaintiff, OCI Chemical Company (OCI), claims we were responsible
for the damage caused by allegedly defective railcars that were manufactured by us. The lawsuit was
filed on September 19, 2005, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri.
Mediation on November 24, 2008, was not successful. Another mediation is scheduled to take place on
March 9, 2009 and trial has been scheduled for April 13, 2009. We believe that we are not
responsible for the damage and have meritorious defenses against such liability. While we believe
it is reasonably possible that this case could result in a loss to us we do not believe there is
sufficient information to estimate the amount of such loss, if any, resulting from the lawsuit.
We have also been named the defendant in a wrongful death lawsuit, Jennifer Nicole Lerma v.
American Railcar
Industries, Inc. The lawsuit was filed on August 17, 2007, in the Circuit Court of Greene County,
Arkansas Civil Division. Mediation on January 6, 2009, was not successful and trial is scheduled
for August 4, 2009. We believe that we are not responsible and have meritorious defenses against
such liability. While we believe it is reasonably possible that this case could result in a loss to
us we do not believe there is sufficient information to estimate the amount of such loss, if any,
resulting from the lawsuit.
We are from time to time party to various other legal proceedings arising out of our business. Such
proceedings, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and
managerial resources. We believe that there are no proceedings pending against us that if the
outcome was unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES
We prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP (Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles). The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of sales and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and assumptions are periodically
evaluated and may be adjusted in future periods. Our significant accounting policies are described
in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Some of these policies involve a high degree of judgment in their application. The critical
accounting policies, in managements judgment, are those described below. If different assumptions
or conditions prevail, or if our estimates and assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results
could be materially different from those reported.
41
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from railcar sales are recognized following completion of manufacturing, inspection,
customer acceptance and shipment, which is when title and risk for any damage or loss with respect
to the railcars passes to the customer. In some cases, painting and lining work may be outsourced
to an independent contractor and, as a result, the sale for the railcar may be recorded after
customer acceptance when it leaves the manufacturing plant and the sale for the lining work may be
separately recorded following completion of that work by the independent contractor, customer
acceptance and final shipments. Revenues from railcar and industrial components are recorded at the
time of product shipment, in accordance with our contractual terms. Revenue for railcar maintenance
services is recognized upon completion and shipment of railcars from our plants. Revenue for fleet
management services is recognized as performed.
Inventory
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, and include the cost of materials, direct
labor and manufacturing overhead. We evaluate our ability to realize the value of our inventory
based on a combination of factors including historical usage rates, forecasted sales or usage,
product end of life dates, estimated current and future market values and new product
introductions. Assumptions used in determining our estimates of future product demand may prove to
be incorrect; in which case the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory would have to
be adjusted in the future. When recorded, our reserves are intended to reduce the carrying value of
our inventory to its net realizable value.
Long-lived Assets
We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. The criteria for determining impairment
related to long-lived assets to be held and used is determined by comparing the carrying value of
the long-lived assets to be held and used to managements best estimate of future undiscounted cash
flows expected to result from the use of the assets. If the assets are considered impaired, the
impairment recognized is measured using the difference between the carrying amount of assets and
the fair value of the assets. The estimated fair value of the assets is measured by estimating the
present value of the future discounted cash flows to be generated. Any future determination
requiring write-off of a significant portion of long-lived assets recorded on our balance sheet
could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Goodwill
At December 31, 2008, we had $7.2 million of goodwill recorded in conjunction with a past business
acquisition, all allocated to our Kennett/Custom railcar sub-assembly plants reporting unit within
the Manufacturing Operations segment. Goodwill is subject to annual reviews for impairment based on
a two-step accounting test. The first step is to compare the estimated fair value of any reporting
units within the company that have recorded goodwill with the recorded net book value (including
the goodwill) of the reporting unit. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is higher
than the recorded net book value, no impairment is deemed to exist and no further testing is
required. If, however, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is below the recorded net
book value, then a second step must be performed to determine the goodwill impairment required, if
any. In this second step, the estimated fair value from the first step is used as the purchase
price in a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit. Purchase business combination accounting
rules are followed to determine a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the reporting units
assets and liabilities. The residual amount of goodwill that results from this hypothetical
purchase price allocation is compared to the recorded amount of goodwill for the reporting unit,
and the recorded amount is written down to the hypothetical amount, if lower.
We perform our annual goodwill impairment review on March 1 of each year. During the fourth quarter
of 2008, there were severe disruptions in the credit markets and reductions in global economic
activity, which had significant adverse impacts on stock markets, which contributed to a
significant decline in our companys stock price and corresponding market capitalization. For most
of the fourth quarter, our market capitalization value was significantly below the recorded net
book value of our balance sheet, including goodwill. Based on these overriding factors, as required
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142), indicators existed that we have experienced a significant adverse change in the
business climate and we must review for impairment the fair value of the reporting unit associated
with our goodwill.
42
Because quoted market prices for our reporting units are not available, management must apply
judgment in determining the estimated fair value of these reporting units for purposes of
performing the goodwill impairment test. Management uses all available information to make these
fair value determinations, including the present values of expected future cash flows using
discount rates commensurate with the risks involved in the assets.
A key component of these fair value determinations is a reconciliation of the sum of these net
present value calculations to our market capitalization. We used the market capitalization value as
of December 31, 2008, for the purposes of this reconciliation.
The goodwill accounting principles proscribed in SFAS 142 acknowledge that the observed market
prices of individual trades of a companys stock (and thus its computed market capitalization) may
not be representative of the fair value of the company as a whole. Substantial value may arise from
the ability to take advantage of synergies and other benefits that flow from control over another
entity. Consequently, measuring the fair value of a collection of assets and liabilities that
operate together in a controlled entity is different from measuring the fair value of that entitys
individual common stock. Therefore, once the above net present value calculations have been
determined we also add a control premium to the calculations. This control premium is judgmental
and is based on observed acquisitions in our industry. The resulting fair values calculated for the
reporting units are then compared to observable metrics on large mergers and acquisitions in our
industry to determine whether those valuations, in our judgment, appear reasonable.
After determining the fair values of our various reporting units as of December 31, 2008, it was
determined that our Kennett/Custom reporting unit passed the first step of the goodwill impairment
test. Based on this assessment, we concluded that the fair value of the goodwill was not impaired.
The valuation performed as of December 31, 2008 uses various assumptions about projected cash
flows, discount rates, long-term rates of return, and capital structure. As mentioned above, the
occurrence of actual cash flows or various rates could have an adverse change in the fair value of
our goodwill and cause it to be impaired. A 1.0% increase in the discount rate used would cause the
fair value of the reporting unit to decrease by 8.6%. At this increased discount rate, the goodwill
would not be impaired. A 2.0% increase in the discount rate would cause the fair value of the
reporting unit to decrease by 16.0% and cause it to be impaired. A 10.0% decrease in the cash flow
assumptions used, i.e. decreased pre tax income, would cause the fair value of the reporting unit
to decrease 14.4%. At this decreased cash flow amount, the goodwill would not be impaired. A 20.0%
decrease in the cash flow assumptions used would cause the fair value of the reporting unit to
decrease 23.2% and cause it to be impaired.
Product Warranties
We record a liability for an estimate of costs that we expect to incur under our basic limited
warranty when manufacturing revenue is recognized. Warranty terms are based on the negotiated
railcar sales contracts and typically are for periods of up to five years. Factors affecting our
warranty liability include the number of units sold and historical and anticipated rates of claims
and costs per claim. We assess quarterly the adequacy of our warranty liability based on changes in
these factors. Actual results differing from estimates could have a material effect on results from
operations in the event that unforeseen warranty issues were to occur.
Income Taxes
For financial reporting purposes, income tax expense is estimated based on planned tax return
filings. The amounts anticipated to be reported in those filings may change between the time the
financial statements are prepared and the time the tax returns are filed. Further, because tax
filings are subject to review by taxing authorities, there is also the risk that a position on a
tax return may be challenged by a taxing authority. If the taxing authority is successful in
asserting a position different from that taken by us, differences in a tax expense or between
current and deferred tax items may arise in future periods. Any such differences, which could have
a material impact on our financial statements, would be reflected in the financial statements when
management considers them probable of occurring and the amount reasonably estimable.
43
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. We regularly evaluate for
recoverability our deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance, if necessary, based on
historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of
existing temporary differences and the implementation of tax-planning strategies. We consider
whether it is more likely than not that some portion or that all of the deferred tax assets will be
realized. As of December 31, 2008, we had approximately $2.4 million in net deferred tax
liabilities (net of $10.9 million of deferred tax assets). At this time, we consider it more likely
than not that we will have taxable income in the future that will allow us to realize our deferred
tax assets. As a result, no valuation allowance is currently recorded. However, it is possible that
some or all of our deferred tax assets could ultimately expire unused.
During 2007, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (FIN 48), which required us to record a liability related to
unrecognized tax positions. See our discussion of this in Note 15 in our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Pension and other postretirement benefit costs and liabilities are dependent on assumptions used in
calculating such amounts. The primary assumptions include factors such as discount rates, health
care cost trend rates, expected investment return on plan assets, mortality rates and retirement rates, as
discussed below:
Discount rates
The discount rate assumption used to determine end of year benefit obligations was 6.25% for our
pension plans and 5.6% for our postretirement benefit plans. We review these rates annually and
adjust them to reflect current conditions. Based on our review, we set the rates for 2009 at 6.25%
and 5.6%. We deemed these rates appropriate based on the Citigroup Pension Discount curve analysis
along with expected payments to retirees under the Bude and Shippers plans.
Health care cost trend rates
Our health-care cost trend rate of 9.0% for 2009 related to our postretirement benefit plan is
based on historical retiree cost data, near term health care outlook, including appropriate cost
control measures implemented by us and industry benchmarks and surveys.
Compensation increase
Our compensation increase rate of 4.0% per year related to our postretirement benefit plan is based
on historical experience.
Expected return on plan assets
Our expected return on plan assets for our funded pension plans of 8.0% for 2009 is derived from
detailed periodic studies, which include a review of asset allocation strategies, anticipated
future long-term performance of individual asset classes, risks (standard deviations) and
correlations of returns among the asset classes that comprise the plans asset mix. While the
studies give appropriate consideration to recent plan performance and historical returns, the
assumptions are primarily long-term, prospective rates of return.
Mortality and retirement rates
Mortality and retirement rates are based on actual and anticipated plan experience.
In accordance with GAAP, actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and
amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded
obligation in future periods. While management believes that the assumptions used are appropriate,
differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect our pension and
postretirement obligations and future expense.
44
The following information illustrates the sensitivity to a change in certain assumptions for our
pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on December |
|
|
|
Effect on 2009 Pre-Tax |
|
|
31, 2008 Projected |
|
Change in Assumption |
|
Pension Expense |
|
|
Benefit Obligation |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
1% decrease in discount rate |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
2,162 |
|
1% increase in discount rate |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(1,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% decrease in expected return
on assets |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
1% increase in expected return
on assets |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
The following information illustrates the sensitivity to a change in certain assumptions for our
other postretirement plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on 2009 Pre-Tax |
|
|
Effect on December |
|
|
|
Postretirement Service |
|
|
31, 2008 Projected |
|
Change in Assumption |
|
Cost and Interest Cost |
|
|
Benefit Obligation |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
1% decrease in discount rate |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
1% increase in discount rate |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the
health care plans. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have
the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on 2009 Pre-Tax |
|
|
Effect on December |
|
|
|
Postretirement Service |
|
|
31, 2008 Projected |
|
Change in Assumption |
|
Cost and Interest Cost |
|
|
Benefit Obligation |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
1% decrease in health care cost trend rate |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(398 |
) |
1% increase in health care cost trend rate |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
This
sensitivity analysis reflects the effects of changing one assumption.
Various economic factors and conditions often affect multiple
assumptions simultaneously and the effects of changes in key
assumptions are not necessarily linear.
Environmental
We are involved in investigation and remediation activities at properties that we now own or lease
to address historic contamination and potential contamination by third parties. We are also
involved with state agencies in the cleanup of two sites under these laws. These investigations are
in process but it is too early to be able to make a reasonable estimate, with any certainty, of the
timing and extent of remedial actions that may be required, and the costs that would be involved in
such remediation. Substantially all of the issues identified relate to the use of the properties prior to their transfer to us in 1994 by
ACF and for which ACF has retained liability for
environmental contamination that may have existed at the time of transfer to us. ACF has also
agreed to indemnify us for any cost that might be incurred with those existing issues. We expect
that we will be indemnified for these environmental matters. However, there can be no assurance
that we will not become involved in future litigation or other proceedings, or that we will be able
to recover under our indemnity provisions if we were found to be responsible or liable in any
litigation or proceeding, or that such costs would not be material to us.
45
Stock Based Compensation
In January 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment,
(SFAS 123(R)) which is a revision of SFAS No. 123 Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issues to Employees.
SFAS 123(R) requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based
payment awards made to our employees and directors based on the estimated fair values of the awards
on their grant dates. Our share-based awards include stock options, stock appreciation rights
(SARs) and restricted stock awards.
We use the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair value of our equity instrument awards and other
share based awards issued under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The Black-Scholes model requires
estimates of the expected term of the option, future volatility, dividend yield, forfeiture rate
and the risk-free interest rate. In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 110
(SAB 110), which addressed the expected term aspect of the Black-Scholes model. It stated that
companies that did not have adequate exercise history on equity instruments were allowed to use the
simplified method prescribed by the SEC, which called for an average of the vesting period and
the expiration period of grants with plain vanilla characteristics. These characteristics
included service based vesting, instruments granted at the money along with certain other
requirements.
Both our stock options and SARs have fair value estimates that are generated from the Black-Scholes
calculation. This calculation requires inputs as mentioned above that may require some judgment or
estimation. We use our best judgment at the time of the grant to estimate fair value on the stock
options to record the expense of those options over the vesting period of those options. For the
SARs granted in 2007 and 2008, these are classified as liabilities on the balance sheet and must be
revalued every period. As such, the fair value estimates on the SARs we granted to our employees
are subject to volatility inherent in the stock price since it is based on current market values at
the end of every period. Our SARs settle in cash.
As of December 31, 2008, all compensation costs related to both the vested and the unvested portion
of stock options have been recognized. The remaining unvested stock options vested on January 19,
2009. As of December 31, 2008, unrecognized compensation costs related to the unvested portion of
SARs were approximately $0.3 million and are expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of approximately 38 months.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, amounts due to/from
affiliates and accounts payable approximate fair values because of the short-term maturity of these
instruments. The fair value of long-term debt is calculated by discounting cash flows through
maturity using our current rate of borrowing for similar liabilities. The fair values of the
short-term investment in The Greenbrier Companies common stock and Canadian dollar option contract
are based upon current market data and exchange rates. Fair value estimates are made at a specific
point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instrument in accordance
with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). These estimates are subjective in nature and
involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with
precision.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R), to create
greater consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of business combinations. SFAS 141R
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination
(i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any controlling interest, (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill
acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R applies to fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. Management believes the adoption of this pronouncement will not have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. The guidance will become
effective as of the beginning of the Companys fiscal year on January 1, 2009. Management believes
the adoption of this pronouncement will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
46
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 expands quarterly
disclosure requirements in SFAS 133 about an entitys derivative instruments and hedging
activities. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Management
believes the adoption of this pronouncement will not have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
There were no off balance sheet arrangements in 2008.
Item 7A: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk on potential borrowings we may incur under our revolving
credit facility, as amended. However, we do not plan to enter into swaps or other hedging
arrangements to manage this risk because we do not believe the risk is significant. On an annual
basis, a 1.0% change in the interest rate in our revolving credit facility will increase or
decrease our interest expense by $10,000 for every $1.0 million of outstanding borrowings.
We are exposed to price risks associated with the purchase of raw materials, especially steel and
heavy castings. The cost of steel, heavy castings and all other materials used in the production of
our railcars represents approximately 80-85% of our direct manufacturing costs. Given the
significant increases in the price of raw materials since November 2003, this exposure can affect
our costs of production. We believe that the risk to our margins and profitability has been greatly
reduced by the variable pricing contracts we now have in place with many of our current railcar
manufacturing contracts with our customers. These contracts adjust the purchase prices of our
railcars to reflect increases or decreases in the cost of certain raw materials and components and,
as a result, we are able to pass on to our customers most of the increased raw material and
component costs with respect to the railcars we plan to produce and deliver during 2009. We believe
that we currently have excellent supplier relationships and do not anticipate that material
constraints will limit our production capacity. Such constraints may exist if railcar production
was to increase beyond current levels, or other economic changes were to occur that affect the
availability of our raw materials.
We have entered into natural gas contracts that contain fixed price and minimum purchase
requirements, with purchase requirements of $0.7 million remaining as of December 31, 2008, that
expose us to the risk of natural gas price fluctuations. We believe that the risk to our margins is
not significant given that natural gas represents a small portion of our direct manufacturing
costs. However, if the price of natural gas were to significantly decrease during 2009 we would be
paying higher prices than our competitors.
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange risks as a result of our Canadian repair operations and
the foreign currency option to purchase CAD for $3.3 million USD. We have committed to purchasing
CAD to hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk related to capital expenditures for the
expansion of our Canadian repair operations, which could result in significant losses if the
exchange rate were to rapidly become unfavorable for us.
47
Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
American Railcar Industries, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of American Railcar Industries, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
48
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
American Railcar Industries, Inc
We have audited American Railcar Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries (a Delaware Corporation)
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). American Railcar Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on American Railcar Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, American Railcar Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of American Railcar Industries, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008, and our report dated March 3, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 3, 2009
49
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
American Railcar Industries, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Railcar Industries, Inc.
and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of American Railcar Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), American Railcar Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 3, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 3, 2009
50
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
291,788 |
|
|
$ |
303,882 |
|
Short-term investments available for sale securities |
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
39,725 |
|
|
|
33,523 |
|
Accounts receivable, due from affiliates |
|
|
10,283 |
|
|
|
17,175 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
97,245 |
|
|
|
93,475 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
5,314 |
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
449,217 |
|
|
|
454,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
206,936 |
|
|
|
175,166 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
3,977 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,169 |
|
|
|
7,169 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
13,091 |
|
|
|
13,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
679,654 |
|
|
$ |
654,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
42,201 |
|
|
|
47,903 |
|
Accounts payable, due to affiliates |
|
|
5,193 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
Accrued expenses and taxes |
|
|
7,758 |
|
|
|
5,866 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
10,413 |
|
|
|
10,379 |
|
Accrued interest expense |
|
|
6,907 |
|
|
|
6,907 |
|
Accrued dividends |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
73,111 |
|
|
|
74,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
4,683 |
|
|
|
5,690 |
|
Pension and post-retirement liabilities, less current portion |
|
|
9,024 |
|
|
|
6,435 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
364,929 |
|
|
|
363,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,
21,302,296 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2008 and 2007 |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
239,617 |
|
|
|
239,621 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
80,035 |
|
|
|
51,314 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(5,140 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
314,725 |
|
|
|
290,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
679,654 |
|
|
$ |
654,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
51
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing operations (including revenues from affiliates of $182,760,
$140,164 and $50,003 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively) |
|
$ |
757,505 |
|
|
$ |
648,124 |
|
|
$ |
597,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railcar services (including revenues from affiliates of $15,338, $15,969
and $18,923 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively) |
|
|
51,301 |
|
|
|
50,003 |
|
|
|
48,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
808,806 |
|
|
|
698,127 |
|
|
|
646,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing operations |
|
|
(682,744 |
) |
|
|
(568,023 |
) |
|
|
(537,344 |
) |
Railcar services |
|
|
(41,653 |
) |
|
|
(41,040 |
) |
|
|
(38,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
(724,397 |
) |
|
|
(609,063 |
) |
|
|
(575,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
84,409 |
|
|
|
89,064 |
|
|
|
70,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income related to insurance recoveries, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,946 |
|
Gain on asset conversion, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
Selling, administrative and other (including costs from affiliates of
$606, $606 and $2,035 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively) |
|
|
(26,535 |
) |
|
|
(27,379 |
) |
|
|
(28,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
57,874 |
|
|
|
61,685 |
|
|
|
56,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (including interest income from affiliates of $34, $57
and $54 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively) |
|
|
7,835 |
|
|
|
13,829 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
Interest expense (including interest expense to affiliates of $0, $0 and
$98 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively) |
|
|
(20,299 |
) |
|
|
(17,027 |
) |
|
|
(1,372 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
3,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from joint ventures |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax expense |
|
|
49,785 |
|
|
|
59,368 |
|
|
|
55,956 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(18,403 |
) |
|
|
(22,104 |
) |
|
|
(20,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
31,382 |
|
|
$ |
37,264 |
|
|
$ |
35,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less preferred dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings available to common share holders |
|
$ |
31,382 |
|
|
$ |
37,264 |
|
|
$ |
34,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share basic |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
Net earnings per common share diluted |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
|
21,274 |
|
|
|
20,667 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
|
21,357 |
|
|
|
20,733 |
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
52
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
31,382 |
|
|
$ |
37,264 |
|
|
$ |
35,204 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
20,148 |
|
|
|
14,085 |
|
|
|
10,674 |
|
Amortization of deferred costs |
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
4,393 |
|
Insurance compensation for assets and storm clean-up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,938 |
) |
Write-off of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
8,116 |
|
Income related to reversal of stock based compensation for stock options |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in joint venture investment as a result of (earnings) loss |
|
|
(718 |
) |
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
734 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivative assets |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
Long-lived asset impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
Items reclassified as cash from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain on sale of short-term investments available for sale securities |
|
|
(2,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain on derivative assets |
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from short-term investments available for sale securities |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(6,897 |
) |
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
Accounts receivable, due from affiliate |
|
|
6,892 |
|
|
|
(7,543 |
) |
|
|
(4,522 |
) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
(3,770 |
) |
|
|
10,035 |
|
|
|
(11,672 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
(3,317 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(5,702 |
) |
|
|
(7,059 |
) |
|
|
(831 |
) |
Accounts payable, due to affiliate |
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
(1,292 |
) |
Accrued expenses and taxes |
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
|
10,195 |
|
|
|
(1,532 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
(1,608 |
) |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
44,322 |
|
|
|
60,230 |
|
|
|
29,967 |
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(52,432 |
) |
|
|
(59,367 |
) |
|
|
(44,916 |
) |
Sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments available for sale securities |
|
|
(27,857 |
) |
|
|
(100,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Sales of short-term investments available for sale securities |
|
|
23,631 |
|
|
|
100,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from short-term investments available for sale securities |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain on derivative assets |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property insurance advance on Marmaduke tornado damage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,938 |
|
Proceeds from repayment of note receivable from affiliate |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
(8,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Sale of investment in joint venture |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(53,812 |
) |
|
|
(67,434 |
) |
|
|
(51,704 |
) |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Continued
53
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,275 |
|
Offering costs initial public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,605 |
) |
Preferred stock redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82,056 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,904 |
) |
Common stock dividends |
|
|
(2,556 |
) |
|
|
(2,551 |
) |
|
|
(1,908 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in amount due to affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,476 |
) |
Majority shareholder capital contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
Finance fees related to new credit facility |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior unsecured
notes, gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offering costs senior unsecured notes issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(40,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(2,604 |
) |
|
|
270,164 |
|
|
|
33,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(12,094 |
) |
|
|
262,960 |
|
|
|
12,230 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
303,882 |
|
|
|
40,922 |
|
|
|
28,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
291,788 |
|
|
$ |
303,882 |
|
|
$ |
40,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
54
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
New |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
New |
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
(accumulated |
|
|
Stock- |
|
|
preferred |
|
|
Stock- |
|
|
Common |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
deficit) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
stock |
|
|
capital |
|
|
loss |
|
|
equity |
|
January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(15,442 |
) |
|
|
82,055 |
|
|
$ |
82,055 |
|
|
|
11,147 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
41,667 |
|
|
$ |
(1,631 |
) |
|
$ |
106,760 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
35,204 |
|
|
|
35,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,204 |
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax effect of $7 |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
35,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of adopting FAS 158, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
(792 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
IPO proceeds, net of related costs of $6,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,775 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
185,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,811 |
|
Purchase preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82,055 |
) |
|
|
(82,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82,055 |
) |
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545 |
) |
Restricted stock grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
Capital contribution by majority shareholder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
21,208 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
235,768 |
|
|
$ |
(2,449 |
) |
|
$ |
250,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
37,264 |
|
|
|
37,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,264 |
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax effect of $1,311 |
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
39,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,554 |
) |
Effects of adopting FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Restricted stock grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
239,621 |
|
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
|
$ |
290,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
31,382 |
|
|
|
31,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,382 |
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
Deferred taxes relating to short term investment |
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
Unrealized loss on short term investment |
|
|
(4,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,250 |
) |
|
|
(4,250 |
) |
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax effect of $1,249 |
|
|
(1,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,975 |
) |
|
|
(1,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
26,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of pension measurement date change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,556 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital reduction due to stock
option forfeiture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
80,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
239,617 |
|
|
$ |
(5,140 |
) |
|
$ |
314,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 1 Description of the Business
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the operations of American Railcar
Industries, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively the Company or ARI). Through its
subsidiary, Castings, LLC (Castings), the Company has a one-third ownership interest in Ohio
Castings Company, LLC (Ohio Castings), a limited liability company formed to produce various steel
railcar parts for use or sale by the ownership group. Through its subsidiary, ARI Component
Venture, LLC, the Company has a 37.5% ownership interest in Axis, LLC (Axis), a limited liability
company formed to produce railcar axles, for use or sale by the ownership group. Through its
subsidiaries, American Railcar Mauritius I and American Railcar Mauritius II, the Company has a
50.0% ownership interest in a joint venture company in India, which was formed to produce railcars
and railcar components in India for sale by the joint venture. Through its wholly owned subsidiary,
ARI Longtrain, Inc. (Longtrain), the Company makes investments from time to time. All intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated.
ARI manufactures railcars, custom designed railcar parts for industrial companies, railroads, and
other industrial products, primarily aluminum and special alloy steel castings, for non-rail
customers. ARI also provides railcar maintenance services for railcar fleets, including that of its
affiliate, American Railcar Leasing LLC (ARL). In addition, ARI provides fleet management and
maintenance services for railcars owned by various customers. Such services include inspecting and
supervising the maintenance and repair of such railcars.
The Companys operations are located in the United States and Canada. The Company operates a small
railcar repair facility in Sarnia, Ontario, Canada. Canadian revenues were 0.4%, 0.3% and 0.3% of
total consolidated revenues for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Canadian assets were 0.6% and
0.2% of total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Note 2 Summary of Accounting Policies
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
The Company maintains cash balances at financial institutions in the United States of America which
are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $250,000 and others that are
fully insured under the FDIC Transaction Account Guarantee Program. The Companys cash balances on
deposit exceeded the insured limits by approximately $111.6 million as of December 31, 2008. The
Company has not experienced any losses on such amounts and believes it is not subject to
significant risks related to cash.
Short-term investments
The Companys investments in equity securities are classified as available-for-sale, based upon
whether we intend to hold the investment for the foreseeable future, in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities (SFAS 115). Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value on our
balance sheet while unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are
excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholders equity and when sold
are reclassified out of stockholders equity to the consolidated statements of operations. For
purposes of determining gains and losses, the cost of securities is based on specific
identification.
Derivative assets
The Company has entered into derivative contracts, specifically total return swap contracts and a
foreign currency option contract. As required, the Company accounts for these derivatives under
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), which was
amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities (SFAS 138). The pronouncements established
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities, which
generally require recognition of all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance
sheet at their fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value depends on the intended use of
the derivative and its resulting designation. The Company did not use hedge accounting and
accordingly, all realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts were reflected in
our consolidated statements of operations.
56
Revenue recognition
Revenues from railcar sales are recognized following completion of manufacturing, inspection,
customer acceptance and shipment, which is when title and risk for any damage or loss with respect
to the railcars passes to the customer. In some cases, paint and lining work may be outsourced and,
as a result, the sale for the railcar may be recorded after customer acceptance when it leaves the
manufacturing plant and the sale for the lining work may be separately recorded following
completion of that work by the independent contractor, customer acceptance and final shipment.
Revenues from railcar and industrial parts and components are recorded at the time of product
shipment, in accordance with our contractual terms. Revenue for railcar maintenance services is
recognized upon completion and shipment of railcars from our plants. The Company does not bundle
railcar service contracts with new railcar sales. Revenue for fleet management services is
recognized as performed.
The Company records amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling as part of sales in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Abstract 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and
Handling Fees and Costs, and records related costs in cost of revenue.
ARI presents any tax assessed by a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a
revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer on a net basis as addressed in EITF
Issue No. 06-3, How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should
be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation).
Accounts receivable, net
The Company carries its accounts receivable at cost, less an allowance for doubtful accounts. On a
routine basis, the Company evaluates its account receivable and establishes an allowance for
doubtful accounts, based on our history of past write-offs and collections and current credit
conditions. Accounts are placed for collection on a limited basis once all other methods of
collection have been exhausted. Once it has been determined that the customer is no longer in
business and/or refuses to pay, the accounts are written off.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis, and include
the cost of materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead.
Property, plant and equipment, net
Land, buildings, machinery and equipment are carried at cost, which could include capitalized
interest on borrowed funds. Maintenance and repair costs are charged directly to earnings. Tooling
is generally capitalized and depreciated over a period of approximately five years.
Buildings are depreciated over estimated useful lives that range from 15 to 39 years. The estimated
useful lives of other depreciable assets, including machinery, equipment and leased railcars vary
from 3 to 30 years. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method for financial
reporting purposes and on accelerated methods for tax purposes.
Long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. The criteria for determining impairment
for such long-lived assets to be held and used is determined by comparing the carrying value of
these long- lived assets to be held and used to
managements best estimate of future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the
assets. If the assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by
the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. The
estimated fair value of the assets is measured by estimating the present value of the future
discounted cash flows to be generated.
57
Debt issuance costs
Debt issuance costs were incurred in connection with ARIs issuance of long-term debt as described
in Note 14, and are amortized over the term of the related debt on a straight-line basis. Debt
issuance costs at December 31, 2008 were $3.2 million related to our revolving credit facility and
our unsecured senior notes and will be amortized according to the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
637 |
|
2010 |
|
|
616 |
|
2011 |
|
|
616 |
|
2012 |
|
|
616 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). This standard requires that goodwill and other intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives shall not be amortized but shall be tested for impairment
annually and in interim periods if indicators warrant tests more frequently by comparing the fair
value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. The Company adopted this standard upon the
acquisition of Custom Steel, which resulted in goodwill of $7.2 million, as described in Note 3.
There are no other reporting units that have goodwill.
Investment in joint ventures
The Company uses the equity method to account for its investment in various joint ventures that it
is partner to as described in Note 12. Under the equity method, the Company recognizes its share of
the earnings and losses of the joint ventures as they accrue. Advances and distributions are
charged and credited directly to the investment account.
Income taxes
ARI accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of ARIs assets and liabilities at enacted
tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are recovered or settled.
Pension plans and other postretirement benefits
Certain ARI employees participate in noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans and a
supplemental executive retirement plan. Benefits for the salaried employees are based on salary and
years of service, while those for hourly employees are based on negotiated rates and years of
service.
ARI also sponsors defined contribution retirement plans and health care plans covering certain
employees. Benefit costs are accrued during the years employees render service.
58
Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, amounts due to/from
affiliates and accounts payable approximate fair values because of the short-term maturity of these
instruments. The fair value of long-term debt is calculated by discounting cash flows through
maturity using our current rate of borrowing for similar liabilities. The fair values of the
short-term investment in The Greenbrier Companies common stock and Canadian dollar option contract
are based upon current market data and exchange rates. Fair value estimates are made at a specific
point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instrument in accordance
with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). These estimates are subjective in nature and
involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with
precision.
Foreign currency translation
Balance sheet amounts from the Companys Canadian operations are translated at the exchange rate
effective at year-end and operations statement amounts are translated at the average rate of
exchange prevailing during the year. Currency translation adjustments are included in Stockholders
Equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period
from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income
consists of net earnings, foreign currency translation adjustment and minimum pension liability
adjustments, which are shown net of tax and changes resulting from unrealized gains and losses on
short-term investments. Accumulated other comprehensive loss, after tax, as of December 31, 2008
consists of foreign currency translation losses of $0.2 million, pension and postretirement charges
of $2.4 million and unrealized losses and deferred taxes on short-term investments of $2.5 million.
As of December 31, 2007 accumulated other comprehensive loss, after tax, consists of foreign
currency gain of $0.2 million and pension and postretirement charges of and $0.4 million.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated as net earnings attributable to common shareholders divided
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the respective period. Diluted
earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to common shareholders by
the weighted-average number of shares outstanding plus dilutive potential common shares outstanding
during the year.
Use of estimates
Management of ARI has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
to prepare these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Significant items subject to estimates and assumptions include
deferred taxes, workers compensation accrual, valuation allowances for accounts receivable and
inventory obsolescence, depreciable lives of assets, equity based compensation fair values and the
reserve for warranty claims. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Stock-based compensation
The Company applies the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payments (SFAS 123(R)), to stock
option awards, restricted stock, and stock appreciation rights issued. The compensation cost
recorded for these awards will be based on their fair value as required by SFAS 123(R).
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior year presentations have been made to conform to the 2008
presentation.
59
Recent accounting pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R), to create
greater consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of business combinations. SFAS 141R
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination
(i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any controlling interest, (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill
acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R applies to fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. Management believes the adoption of this pronouncement will not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. The guidance will become effective as of the beginning of the Companys fiscal year on
January 1, 2009. Management believes the adoption of this pronouncement will not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 expands quarterly
disclosure requirements in SFAS 133 about an entitys derivative instruments and hedging
activities. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Management
believes the adoption of this pronouncement will not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 Acquisition
On March 31, 2006, the Company acquired all of the common stock of Custom Steel, Inc. (Custom
Steel), a subsidiary of Steel Technologies, Inc. Custom Steel operates a facility located adjacent
to our component manufacturing facility in Kennett, Missouri, which produces value-added fabricated
parts that primarily support our railcar manufacturing operations. Prior to the acquisition, ARI
was Custom Steels primary customer. The purchase price was $17.2 million, which resulted in
goodwill of $7.2 million.
The fair value of the assets and acquired liabilities were $3.8 million of inventory, $8.0 million
of property, plant and equipment, and $1.8 million of a deferred tax liability.
The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, with the purchase price
being allocated to the assets acquired based on relative fair values. Accordingly, the related
results of operations of Custom Steel have been included in the consolidated statement of
operations after March 31, 2006.
Note 4 Short-term Investments Available for Sale Securities
During January 2008, Longtrain purchased 1,530,000 shares of common stock of The Greenbrier
Companies, Inc. (Greenbrier) in the open market. The Company believed that these shares represented
approximately 9.5% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Greenbrier at the time of their
purchase. This investment was made with the intention to enter into discussions regarding a
possible business combination of the Company and Greenbrier. This investment is classified as a
short-term investment available-for-sale security in accordance with SFAS 115 as the Company does
not intend on holding this investment long-term.
In June 2008, it was disclosed that the parties were not at that time pursuing further discussions
regarding a business combination. Subsequently, Longtrain sold 1,156,659 shares of Greenbrier
resulting in a realized gain of $2.6 million before tax.
As of December 31, 2008, the market price of the common stock of Greenbrier was $6.87 per share,
which resulted in the investment value of $2.6 million as of that date on the remaining 373,341
shares of Greenbrier that the Company owns. The resulting unrealized loss of $4.3 million was
recognized as accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders equity, net of deferred
taxes.
The Company performed a review its investment in Greenbrier common stock as of December 31, 2008 to
determine if an other-than-temporary impairment existed. Factors considered in the assessment
included but were not limited to the following: the Companys ability and intent to hold the security until loss
recovery, the number of quarters in an unrealized loss position and other market conditions. Based
on the Companys review, an other-than-temporary impairment was not identified as of December 31,
2008.
60
Note 5 Derivatives
Total return swaps
During January 2008, Longtrain entered into total return swap agreements referenced to the fair
value of 400,000 shares of common stock of Greenbrier. The total notional amount of these swap
agreements was approximately $7.4 million, which represents the fair market value of the referenced
shares at the time Longtrain entered into the agreements. During July and August 2008, all of the
Companys total return swap agreements were settled prior to their date of expiration in accordance
with the terms of the agreements. The settlement of the total return swap agreements resulted in a
realized gain of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Foreign currency option
The Company entered into a foreign currency option in October 2008, to purchase Canadian Dollars
for $5.3 million U.S. Dollars from October 2008 through April 2009, with fixed exchange rates and
exchange limits each month. This option was entered into to hedge our exposure to foreign currency
exchange risk related to capital expenditures for the expansion of the Companys Canadian repair
operations. In 2008, the Company expended $2.0 million USD resulting in a realized gain of $0.1
million based on the exchange spot rate on the various exercise dates.
The Company did not use hedge accounting for this option thus any resulting unrealized gain has
been included in other income with a derivative asset on the balance sheet and any unrealized loss
has been recorded in other loss with a derivative liability on the balance sheet. As of December
31, 2008, an unrealized gain and derivative asset have been recorded for $0.1 million.
Note 6 Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), on January 1, 2008, which,
among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about investments that are measured and reported
at fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework that prioritizes and ranks
the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price
observability is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the
characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available active quoted prices
or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher
degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.
The Company adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008, with the exception of the application of the
statement to non-recurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. Non-recurring
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities for which we have not applied the provisions of
SFAS 157 include those measured at fair value in goodwill impairment testing.
Investments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the
following categories:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments as
of the reporting date. The type of investments included in Level I include listed
equities and listed derivatives. As required by SFAS 157, the Company does not adjust
the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where they hold a large
position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are
either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is
determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. Investments that
are generally included in this category include corporate bonds and loans, less liquid
and restricted equity securities and certain over-the-counter derivatives. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and include situations
where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs into the
determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. |
61
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair
value hierarchy. In such cases, an investments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on
the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ARIs assessment of
the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires
judgment and considers factors specific to the investment.
The following table summarizes the valuation of our investments by the above SFAS 157 fair value
hierarchy levels as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term investments available for sale securities |
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
Derivative asset foreign currency option |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 Accounts Receivable, net
Accounts Receivable, net, consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Accounts receivable, gross |
|
$ |
40,540 |
|
|
$ |
34,020 |
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(815 |
) |
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
39,725 |
|
|
$ |
33,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allowance for doubtful accounts consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Beginning Balance |
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
Provision |
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
Note 8 Inventories, net
Inventories, net, consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
59,457 |
|
|
$ |
52,322 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
22,137 |
|
|
|
19,835 |
|
Finished products |
|
|
18,300 |
|
|
|
24,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
|
99,894 |
|
|
|
96,180 |
|
Less reserves |
|
|
(2,649 |
) |
|
|
(2,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
97,245 |
|
|
$ |
93,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory reserves consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Beginning Balance |
|
$ |
2,705 |
|
|
$ |
2,729 |
|
|
$ |
2,318 |
|
Provision |
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(967 |
) |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
2,649 |
|
|
$ |
2,705 |
|
|
$ |
2,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 Property, Plant and Equipment, net
The following table summarizes the components of property, plant and equipment, net (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
$ |
130,054 |
|
|
$ |
117,899 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
167,586 |
|
|
|
113,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,640 |
|
|
|
231,314 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(105,938 |
) |
|
|
(86,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
191,702 |
|
|
|
144,407 |
|
Land |
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
Construction in process |
|
|
11,928 |
|
|
|
27,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
206,936 |
|
|
$ |
175,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $20.1 million, $14.1
million and $10.7 million, respectively.
Capitalized interest
In conjunction with the Senior Unsecured Fixed Rate Notes offering described in Note 14, the
Company began recording capitalized interest on certain property, plant and equipment capital
projects. The amount of interest capitalized as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $2.9 million and
$1.4 million, respectively.
Lease agreements
During 2008, the Company entered into two agreements to lease a fixed number of railcars to third
parties for multiple years. One of the leases includes a provision that allows the lessee to
purchase any portion of the leased railcars at any time during the lease term for a stated market
price, which approximates fair value. These agreements have been classified as operating leases in
accordance with SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases (SFAS 13). As a result of applying the rules
from SFAS 13 the leased railcars have been included in machinery and equipment and will be
depreciated in accordance with the Companys depreciation policy.
63
Note 10 Long-Lived Asset Impairment Charges
The Company has determined that there are no triggering events that require the impairment
assessment of long-lived assets, therefore no impairment charges have been recognized on any
long-lived assets during the year ended December 31, 2008 or 2007. During the year ended December
31, 2006, the Company reduced the carrying value of equipment purchased under a lease agreement
from an unrelated third party by $0.4 million for its manufacturing plants, which is reflected in
the consolidated statement of operations under costs of manufacturing operations.
Note 11 Goodwill
At December 31, 2008, the Company had $7.2 million of goodwill recorded in conjunction with a past
business acquisition, all allocated to the Companys Kennett/Custom railcar sub-assembly plants
reporting unit within the Manufacturing Operations segment. Goodwill is subject to annual reviews
for impairment based on a two-step accounting test. The first step is to compare the estimated
fair value of any reporting units within the company that have recorded goodwill with the recorded
net book value (including the goodwill) of the reporting unit. If the estimated fair value of the
reporting unit is higher than the recorded net book value, no impairment is deemed to exist and no
further testing is required. If, however, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is below
the recorded net book value, then a second step must be performed to determine the goodwill
impairment required, if any. In this second step, the estimated fair value from the first step is
used as the purchase price in a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit. Purchase business
combination accounting rules are followed to determine a hypothetical purchase price allocation to
the reporting units assets and liabilities. The residual amount of goodwill that results from
this hypothetical purchase price allocation is compared to the recorded amount of goodwill for the
reporting unit, and the recorded amount is written down to the hypothetical amount, if lower.
The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment review on March 1 of each year. During the
fourth quarter of 2008, there were severe disruptions in the credit markets and reductions in
global economic activity, which had significant adverse impacts on stock markets, which contributed
to a significant decline in the Companys stock price and corresponding market capitalization. For
most of the fourth quarter, the Companys market capitalization value was significantly below the
recorded net book value of the Companys balance sheet, including goodwill. Based on these
overriding factors, as required under
SFAS 142, indicators existed that the Company had experienced
a significant adverse change in the business climate which we determined to be a triggering event
requiring us to review for impairment the fair value of the reporting unit associated with the
Companys goodwill.
Because quoted market prices for the Companys reporting units are not available, management must
apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of these reporting units for purposes of
performing the goodwill impairment test. Management uses all available information to make these
fair value determinations, including the present values of expected future cash flows using
discount rates commensurate with the risks involved in the assets.
A key component of these fair value determinations is a reconciliation of the sum of these net
present value calculations to the Companys market capitalization. The Company used the market
capitalization value as of December 31, 2008, for the purposes of this reconciliation.
The goodwill accounting principles proscribed in SFAS 142 acknowledge that the observed market
prices of individual trades of a companys stock (and thus its computed market capitalization) may not be
representative of the fair value of the company as a whole. Substantial value may arise from the
ability to take advantage of synergies and other benefits that flow from control over another
entity. Consequently, measuring the fair value of a collection of assets and liabilities that
operate together in a controlled entity is different from measuring the fair value of that entitys
individual common stock. Therefore, once the above net present value calculations have been
determined the Company also adds a control premium to the calculations. This control premium is
judgmental and is based on observed acquisitions in the Companys industry. The resultant fair
values calculated for the reporting units are then compared to observable metrics on large mergers
and acquisitions in the Companys industry to determine whether those valuations, in the Companys
judgment, appear reasonable.
After determining the fair values of the Companys various reporting units as of December 31, 2008,
it was determined that the Companys Kennett/Custom reporting unit passed the first step of the
goodwill impairment test. Based on this assessment, the Company concluded that the fair value of
the goodwill was not impaired.
64
Note 12 Investments in Joint Ventures
The Company is party to three joint ventures; Ohio Castings, Axis and India. The equity method is
used to account for the investments in Ohio Castings and Axis. Under the equity method, the Company
recognizes its share of the earnings and losses of the joint ventures as they accrue. Advances and
distributions are charged and credited directly to the investment accounts. As of December 31,
2008, there have been no equity contributions to the India joint venture.
The carrying amount of investments in joint ventures is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Carrying amount of investments in joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio Castings |
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,855 |
|
Axis |
|
|
6,091 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
India |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment in joint ventures |
|
$ |
13,091 |
|
|
$ |
13,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio Castings
Ohio Castings produces railcar parts that are sold to one of the joint venture partners. The joint
venture partner sells these parts to outside third parties at current market prices and sells them
to the Company and the other joint venture partner in Ohio Castings at cost plus a licensing fee.
The Company has been involved with this joint venture since 2003. During May 2007, each of the Ohio
Castings joint venture partners made a $1.0 million equity contribution.
Ohio Castings closed its Chicago Castings facility effective June 30, 2006, in connection with a
consolidation of its operations. Ohio Castings is responsible for the exit liabilities of this
closure. This closing did not have a material financial impact on the Company.
The Company has determined that, although the joint venture is a variable interest entity (VIE),
the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The significant factor in this determination was that
no partner, including the Company and Castings, has rights to the majority of returns, losses, or
votes. Additionally, the risk of loss to Castings and the Company is limited to its investment in
the VIE and a portion of Ohio Castings debt, which the Company has guaranteed. The two other
partners of Ohio Castings have made the same guarantees of these obligations.
The Company, along with the other members of Ohio Castings, has guaranteed bonds payable and a
state loan issued to one of Ohio Castings subsidiaries by the State of Ohio as further discussed
in Note 17. The value of the guarantee, was less than $0.1 million at December 31, 2008, but has
been recorded by the Company in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others
(FIN 45).
65
See Note 22 for information regarding financial transactions among the Company, Ohio Castings and
Castings.
Summary combined financial position information for Ohio Castings, the investee company is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Financial position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
12,737 |
|
|
$ |
11,638 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
14,192 |
|
|
|
15,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
26,929 |
|
|
|
26,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
8,414 |
|
|
|
9,736 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
5,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
10,473 |
|
|
|
15,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members equity |
|
|
16,456 |
|
|
|
11,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members equity |
|
$ |
26,929 |
|
|
$ |
26,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary combined results of operations for Ohio Castings, the investee company are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Results of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
88,795 |
|
|
$ |
74,238 |
|
|
$ |
108,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earning (loss) |
|
|
5,012 |
|
|
|
2,394 |
|
|
|
(2,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
5,321 |
|
|
$ |
2,702 |
|
|
$ |
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Axis
In June 2007, ARI, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an agreement with another
partner to form a joint venture, Axis, to manufacture and sell railcar axles at a facility to be
constructed by the joint venture. The railcar axles manufactured by the joint venture are expected
to be sold at current market prices to outside third parties and some of the joint venture
partners, including the Company.
Site preparation of the axle plant facility started during the fourth quarter of 2007 and the
Company expects the plant to begin production in the second quarter of 2009. As production has not
begun for Axis and it is in the startup and construction phases the joint venture is considered a
development stage enterprise. The joint venture is incurring startup costs related to design,
training, staffing, and testing, in addition to interest expense on the funds borrowed under its
credit agreement.
Two partners initially owned the joint venture equally until February 2008, when they sold equal
equity interests in Axis to two new partners. ARI and the other initial partner have an ownership
interest of 37.5%, after giving effect to the new partners. The executive committee of the joint
venture is comprised of one representative from each initial partner. Each representative has equal
voting rights and equal decision-making rights for operational and strategic decisions of the joint
venture.
The Company has determined that, although the joint venture is a variable interest entity (VIE),
the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The significant factor in this determination was that
no partner, including the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, has rights to the majority of
returns, losses, or votes. Additionally, the risk of loss to the Company and subsidiary is limited
to its investment in the VIE and a half of Axis debt, which the Company has guaranteed. The other
37.5% partner has guaranteed the other half of Axis debt.
66
The Company, along with the other initial partner of Axis, has guaranteed a credit agreement
entered into by Axis during December 2007, as further discussed in Note 17. The value of the
Companys portion of the guarantee, which was $0.9 million at December 31, 2008, has been recorded
by the Company in accordance with FIN 45.
See Note 22 for information regarding financial transactions among the Company, the Companys
wholly-owned subsidiary and Axis.
Summary combined financial position information for Axis, the investee company is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Financial position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
|
$ |
4,409 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
65,358 |
|
|
|
19,243 |
|
Long term assets |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
67,911 |
|
|
|
24,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
12,920 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
42,908 |
|
|
|
9,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
55,828 |
|
|
|
9,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members equity |
|
|
12,083 |
|
|
|
14,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members equity |
|
$ |
67,911 |
|
|
$ |
24,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary combined financial results for Axis, the investee company, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Financial results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before interest expense |
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India
In June 2008, the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, entered into an agreement with a
partner in India to form a joint venture company to manufacture, sell and supply freight railcars
and their components in India and other countries to be agreed upon at a facility to be constructed
in India by the joint venture. The joint venture is owned 50.0% by both partners and each partner
has agreed to make limited, equal capital contributions to the joint venture. As of December 31,
2008, no equity investment had been made.
Note 13 Warranties
The Company provides limited warranties on certain products for periods ranging from one year for
parts and services to five years on new railcars. Factors affecting the Companys warranty
liability include the number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of claims and costs
per claim. The Company assesses the adequacy of its warranty liability based on changes in these
factors.
67
The overall change in the Companys warranty reserve, including the aforementioned reduction, is
reflected on the consolidated balance sheet in accrued expenses and taxes, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Liability, beginning of year |
|
$ |
2,503 |
|
|
$ |
1,753 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
Provision for new warranties issued |
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
2,063 |
|
Warranty claims |
|
|
(1,366 |
) |
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability, end of year |
|
$ |
2,595 |
|
|
$ |
2,503 |
|
|
$ |
1,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14 Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current portion |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
275,008 |
|
Less current portion of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt over the next five years, as of December 31, 2008, are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit
The Company has an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (revolving credit agreement) in place,
providing for the terms of the Companys revolving credit facility with Capital One Leverage
Finance Corporation, as administrative agent for various lenders. The Company had no borrowings
outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and has had no borrowings outstanding under this revolving
credit facility since its inception in January 2006. The note bears interest at various rates based
on LIBOR or prime. As of December 31, 2008, the interest rate on the revolving credit facility was
2.75% based on the U.S. prime rate at that time.
The revolving credit facility has both affirmative and negative covenants as defined in the
agreement, including, without limitation, an adjusted fixed charge coverage ratio (coverage ratio),
a maximum total debt leverage ratio (leverage ratio) and limitations on capital expenditures and
dividends. These negative covenants include certain limitations on, among other things, the
Companys ability to incur or maintain indebtedness, sell or dispose of collateral, grant credit
and declare or pay dividends or make distributions on common stock or other equity securities. The
revolving credit facility has a total commitment of the lesser of (i) $100.0 million or (ii) an
amount equal to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable plus a percentage of eligible raw
materials, work in process and finished goods inventory. In addition, the revolving credit facility
includes a capital expenditure sub-facility of $30.0 million based on the percentage of the costs
related to equipment the Company may acquire. The revolving credit facility expires on October 5,
2009, and provided commercially favorable terms are available, we plan on entering into a new
agreement upon expiration. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are collateralized by
accounts receivable, contracts, leases, instruments, chattel paper, inventory, pledged accounts,
certain other assets and equipment purchased with proceeds of the capital expenditure sub-facility.
68
Compliance with the coverage and leverage ratios is not required unless the Companys excess
availability under the revolving credit facility is less than $30.0 million (or has been less than
$30.0 million at any time during the prior 90 days). Under this circumstance, the Companys
coverage ratio must not be less than 1.2 to 1.0 on a quarterly and annual basis. Under this
circumstance and if the Company has incurred debt during the quarter, the leverage ratio must not
be greater than 4.0 to 1.0 on a quarterly and annual basis. At December 31, 2008, the Company had
$80.0 million of availability under the revolving credit facility.
The Company was not required to calculate the leverage ratio or the adjusted fixed charge coverage
ratio as of December 31, 2008, as its excess availability was greater than $30.0 million and there
were no other circumstances that required either of these two ratios to be tested as of that date.
The Company declared quarterly dividends of $0.03 per common share during 2008, which did not
breach any covenants in the revolving credit agreement.
Mortgage note
The Company had a mortgage note outstanding with a liability of less than $0.1 million as of
December 31, 2007, that was paid off in January 2008.
Senior unsecured fixed rate notes
In February 2007, the Company completed the offering of $275.0 million senior unsecured fixed rate
notes (the notes), which were subsequently exchanged for registered notes in March 2007. The fair
value of these notes was approximately $180.8 million and $259.9 million at December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
The notes bear a fixed interest rate that is set at 7.5% and are due in 2014. Interest on the notes
is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1. The terms of the notes contain
restrictive covenants that limit the Companys ability to, among other things, incur additional
debt, make certain restricted payments and enter into certain significant transactions with
shareholders and affiliates. These covenants become more restrictive if the Companys fixed charge
coverage ratio, as defined, is less than 2.0 to 1.0. The Company was in compliance with all of its
covenants under the notes as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Prior to March 1, 2011, the notes may be redeemed in whole or in part at a redemption price equal
to 100.0% of the applicable principal amount, plus an applicable premium based upon a present value
calculation using an applicable treasury rate plus 0.5%, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Commencing on March 1, 2011, the redemption price is set at 103.75% of the principal amount of the
notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, and declines annually until it is reduced to 100.0% of the
principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest from and after March 1, 2013. In
addition, ARI may redeem up to 35.0% of the notes, beginning on March 1, 2010, at an initial
redemption price of 107.5% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest with money
that the Company raises from one or more qualified equity offerings.
69
Note 15 Income Taxes
Income tax expense consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
14,290 |
|
|
$ |
19,356 |
|
|
$ |
17,249 |
|
State and local |
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
2,610 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
16,942 |
|
|
|
22,904 |
|
|
|
19,960 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
685 |
|
State and local |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred |
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
(800 |
) |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
18,403 |
|
|
$ |
22,104 |
|
|
$ |
20,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense attributable to earnings from operations differed from the amounts computed by
applying the U.S. Federal statutory income tax rate of 35.0% to earnings from operations by the
following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Computed income tax expense |
|
$ |
17,424 |
|
|
$ |
20,779 |
|
|
$ |
19,585 |
|
State and local taxes, net
of federal tax expense |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
Non-deductible expenses |
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
(654 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
18,403 |
|
|
$ |
22,104 |
|
|
$ |
20,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Computed income tax expense |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State and
local taxes, net of federal tax expense |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Non-deductible expenses |
|
|
(1.1 |
%) |
|
|
(1.9 |
%) |
|
|
(1.2 |
%) |
Other, net |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
37.2 |
% |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
The tax effects of temporary differences that have given rise to deferred tax assets and
liabilities are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions not currently deductible |
|
$ |
2,331 |
|
|
$ |
1,610 |
|
Non-current deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions not currently deductible |
|
|
4,385 |
|
|
|
3,481 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
Pensions and post retirement |
|
|
3,323 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current deferred tax asset |
|
|
8,605 |
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
10,936 |
|
|
$ |
8,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on financial instruments |
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Realized gain (loss) on financial instruments |
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
(507 |
) |
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(14,628 |
) |
|
|
(11,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
(13,322 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred tax asset (liability) is classified in the balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
2,331 |
|
|
$ |
1,610 |
|
Current deferred tax liability |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets (liability), net |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred tax assets |
|
|
8,605 |
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
Non-current deferred tax liability |
|
|
(13,288 |
) |
|
|
(12,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred tax assets (liability), net |
|
|
(4,683 |
) |
|
|
(5,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
Non-current deferred tax liability, net |
|
|
(4,683 |
) |
|
|
(5,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
(2,386 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the consolidated balance sheets, these deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as
either current or non-current based on the classification of the related liability or asset for
financial reporting. A deferred tax asset or liability that is not related to an asset or liability
for financial reporting, including deferred taxes related to carryforwards, is classified according
to the expected reversal date of the temporary differences as of the end of the year.
No valuation allowances have been recorded at December 31, 2008 and 2007, as management believes
that it is more likely than not that all deferred tax assets will be fully realized based on the
expectation of taxable income in future years. There were no net operating loss carryforwards at
December 31, 2008 and 2007.
71
FASB Interpretation No. 48
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (FIN 48),
on January 1, 2007. As of December 31, 2008, the Companys unrecognized tax benefits are $2.1 million, of which $1.7 million
would impact the effective tax rate if reversed.
The aggregate changes in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
(2,114 |
) |
|
Adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Increases in tax positions for prior years |
|
|
(466 |
) |
Decreases in tax positions for prior years |
|
|
812 |
|
Increases in tax positions for current years |
|
|
(168 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
485 |
|
Lapses in statutes |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIN 48 liability activity, net |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
(1,493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in tax positions for prior years |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Decreases in tax positions for prior years |
|
|
58 |
|
Increases in tax positions for current years |
|
|
(596 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIN 48 liability activity, net |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(2,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The Company accounts for interest expense and penalties related to income tax issues as income tax
expense. The total amount of accrued interest, net of federal income tax benefits, included in the
tax provision is $0.1 million. It is possible that amounts for unrecognized tax benefits,
attributable to accounting methods, could change over the next year, due to statutes expiring
and/or changes in uncertain tax positions. Such a change is estimated to be in the range of $1.0
million to $1.5 million.
The statute of limitation on the Companys 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 Federal income tax returns
will expire on September 15, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The Companys state income
tax returns for the 2005 through 2008 tax years remain open to examination by various state
authorities with the latest closing period on November 15, 2012. The Companys foreign subsidiarys
income tax returns for the 2005 through 2008 tax years remain open to examination by the Canadian
tax authority.
Note 16 Employee Benefit Plans
The Company is the sponsor of two defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees at
designated repair facilities. One plan, which covers certain salaried and hourly employees, is
frozen and no additional benefits are accruing thereunder. The second plan, which covers only
certain of the Companys union employees is active and benefits continue to accrue thereunder. The
assets of all funded plans are held by independent trustees and consist primarily of equity and
fixed income securities. The Company is also the sponsor of an unfunded, non-qualified supplemental
executive retirement plan (SERP) in which several of its employees are participants. The SERP is
frozen and no additional benefits are accruing thereunder.
The Company also provides postretirement healthcare benefits for certain of its salaried and hourly
retired employees. Employees become eligible for healthcare benefits if they retire after attaining
a specific age and service requirements. These benefits are subject to deductibles, co-payment
provisions and other limitations. Effective
December 31, 2008, retiree life insurance benefits have been terminated resulting in a plan
curtailment in 2008. The Company does not have any future liability related to these terminated
benefits.
72
As required under SFAS 158, the Company has changed its measurement date from October 1 to December
31 in 2008. For 2008, the company has changed its valuation date to December 31. ARI chose to use
the valuation performed as of October 1, 2007, and apply it over the fifteen months from October
2007 through December 2008 as permitted under SFAS 158. The net periodic benefit cost for both the
pension plans and the postretirement plan was recognized by allocating three months of the cost to
retained earnings and recognizing the remaining twelve months of expense over the course of 2008.
Thus, during the first quarter of 2008, the Company recognized a $0.1 million decrease to retained
earnings as a result of implementing the measurement date provisions under SFAS 158.
Costs of benefits relating to current service for those employees to whom the Company is
responsible to provide benefits are currently expensed.
The change in benefit obligation and change in plan assets for and the funded status is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation Beginning of year |
|
$ |
16,803 |
|
|
$ |
17,257 |
|
|
$ |
3,758 |
|
|
$ |
5,321 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Plan amendment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Plan curtailment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(1,959 |
) |
Assumed administrative expenses |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation End of year |
|
$ |
17,080 |
|
|
$ |
16,803 |
|
|
$ |
2,750 |
|
|
$ |
3,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets Beginning of year |
|
$ |
13,555 |
|
|
$ |
11,270 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
(3,163 |
) |
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative expenses |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at fair value End of year |
|
$ |
10,695 |
|
|
$ |
13,555 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Funded status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation in excess of plan assets |
|
$ |
(6,385 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,248 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,750 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,758 |
) |
Contributions for the fourth quarter |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized at December 31 |
|
$ |
(6,385 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,750 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Accrued benefit liability short term |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
(136 |
) |
Accrued benefit liability long term |
|
|
(6,384 |
) |
|
|
(2,840 |
) |
|
|
(2,640 |
) |
|
|
(3,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability recognized at December 31 |
|
$ |
(6,385 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,750 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial (gain) loss |
|
$ |
5,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
1,194 |
|
|
$ |
(884 |
) |
Net prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(income) pre-tax at December 31, |
|
$ |
5,653 |
|
|
$ |
1,375 |
|
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
|
$ |
(763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The short-term liability has been reported on the balance sheet in accrued expenses and taxes.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,359 |
) |
|
|
(960 |
) |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (gain) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net preiodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
Additional information
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected
to be paid as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
998 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
6,874 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,157 |
|
|
$ |
1,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects to contribute $0.5 million to its pension plans in 2009.
Pension and other postretirement benefit costs and liabilities are dependent on assumptions used in
calculating such amounts. The primary assumptions include factors such as discount rates, health
care cost trend rates, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, and retirement rates, as
discussed below:
Discount rates
The Company reviews these rates annually and adjusts them to reflect current conditions. The
Company deemed these rates appropriate based on the Citigroup Pension Discount curve analysis along
with expected payments to retirees under the Bude and Shippers plans.
Health care cost trend rates
Our health-care cost trend rate related to the Companys postretirement benefit plan is based on
historical retiree cost data, near term health care outlook, including appropriate cost control
measures implemented by the Company and industry benchmarks and surveys.
Compensation increase
The Companys compensation increase rate of 4.0% per year related to our postretirement benefit
plan is based on historical experience.
Expected return on plan assets
The Companys expected return on plan assets is derived from detailed periodic studies, which
include a review of asset allocation strategies, anticipated future long-term performance of
individual asset classes, risks (standard deviations) and correlations of returns among the asset
classes that comprise the plans asset mix. While the studies give appropriate consideration to
recent plan performance and historical returns, the assumptions are primarily long-term,
prospective rates of return.
Mortality and retirement rates
Mortality and retirement rates are based on actual and anticipated plan experience.
The assumptions used to determine end of year benefit obligations are shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
75
The assumptions used in the measurement of net periodic cost are shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
Expected
return on plan assets |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates for the post retirement benefits plan at December 31 are set
forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Health care cost trend rate assigned for next
year |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Ultimate trend rate |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Year the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the
health care plans. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have
the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percentage Point |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Decrease |
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation |
|
$ |
507 |
|
|
$ |
(398 |
) |
The Companys pension plans weighted average asset allocations at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and
target allocations for 2009, by asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target |
|
|
|
Plan Assets at December 31, |
|
|
Allocation |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Asset Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The objective of the pension plans investment policy is to grow assets in relation to liabilities,
while prudently managing the risk of a decrease in the pension plans assets. The pension plans
management committees have established a target investment mix with upper and lower limits for
investments in equities, fixed-income and other
appropriate investments. Assets will be re-allocated among asset classes from time-to-time to
maintain the target investment mix. The committee has established a target investment mix of 60%
equities and 40% fixed-income for the plan.
The Company also maintains qualified defined contribution plans, which provide benefits to its
employees based on employee contributions, years of service, and employee earnings with
discretionary contributions allowed. Expenses related to these plans were $0.7 million, $0.9
million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
76
Note 17 Commitments and Contingencies
As of December 31, 2008, future minimum rental payments required under noncancellable operating
leases for property and equipment leased by the Company with lease terms longer than one year are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
783 |
|
2010 |
|
|
493 |
|
2011 |
|
|
288 |
|
2012 |
|
|
259 |
|
2013 |
|
|
256 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
3,288 |
|
Total rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $2.6 million, $3.8
million and $4.1 million, respectively.
In connection with the Companys investment in Ohio Castings, ARI has a guarantee on bonds
amounting to $10.0 million issued by the State of Ohio to Ohio Castings, of which $3.1 million was
outstanding as of December 31, 2008. ARI also has a guarantee of a $2.0 million state loan that
provides for purchases of capital equipment, of which $0.9 million was outstanding as of
December 31, 2008. The bonds and state loan are scheduled to be paid-off in December 2010 and June
2011, respectively. The two other partners of Ohio Castings have made identical guarantees of these
obligations. The values of these guarantees amounted to less than $0.1 million at December 31,
2008, and have been recorded by the Company in accordance with FIN 45. ARI would be required to
perform under these guarantees provided Ohio Castings becomes delinquent and we believe the risk
related to these guarantees is low as of December 31, 2008. This determination was made based on
current and forecasted financial information.
One of the Companys joint ventures, Axis entered into a credit agreement in December 2007. In
connection with this event, the Company agreed to a 50.0% guaranty of Axiss obligation under its
credit agreement during the construction and startup phases of the facility. Subject to its terms
and conditions, the guaranty will terminate on the earlier to occur of (i) the repayment in full of
the guaranteed obligations or (ii) after the facility has been in continuous production at a level
sufficient to meet the facilitys projected financial performance and in any event not less than
365 consecutive days from the certified completion of the facilitys construction. As of December
31, 2008, Axis had approximately $48.7 million outstanding under the credit agreement of which the
Companys exposure is 50.0% with a maximum exposure related to it of $35.0 million, exclusive of
any capitalized interest, fees, costs and expenses. This loan is scheduled to be paid-off in June
2016. ARIs initial joint venture partner has made an identical guarantee relating to this credit
agreement. The value of the Companys portion of the guarantee, which was $0.9 million at December
31, 2008, has been recorded by the Company in accordance with FIN 45. ARI would be required to
perform under these guarantees provided Axis becomes delinquent and we believe the risk related to
these guarantees is low as of December 31, 2008. This determination was made based on forecasted
financial information.
The Company is subject to comprehensive Federal, state, local and international environmental laws
and regulations relating to the release or discharge of materials into the environment, the
management, use, processing, handling, storage, transport or disposal of hazardous materials and
wastes, or otherwise relating to the protection of human health and the environment. These laws and
regulations not only expose ARI to liability for the environmental
condition of its current or formerly owned or operated facilities, and its own negligent acts, but
also may expose ARI to liability for the conduct of others or for ARIs actions that were in
compliance with all applicable laws at the time these actions were taken. In addition, these laws
may require significant expenditures to achieve compliance, and are frequently modified or revised
to impose new obligations. Civil and criminal fines and penalties and other sanctions may be
imposed for non-compliance with these environmental laws and regulations. ARIs operations that
involve hazardous materials also raise potential risks of liability under common law. Management
believes that there are no current environmental issues identified that would have a material
adverse affect on the Company. ARI is involved in investigation and remediation activities at
properties that it now owns or leases to address historical contamination and potential
contamination by third parties. The Company is also involved with state agencies in the cleanup of
two sites under these laws. These investigations are in process but it is too early to be able to
make a reasonable estimate, with any certainty, of the timing and extent of remedial actions that
may be required, and the costs that would be involved in such remediation. Substantially all of the
issues identified relate to the use of the properties prior to their
transfer to ARI in 1994 by ACF Industries LLC (ACF) and for which ACF has retained liability for environmental contamination
that may have existed at the time of transfer to ARI. ACF has also agreed to indemnify ARI for any
cost that might be incurred with those existing issues. However, if ACF fails to honor its
obligations to ARI, ARI would be responsible for the cost of such remediation. The Company believes
that its operations and facilities are in substantial compliance with applicable laws and
regulations and that any noncompliance is not likely to have a material adverse effect on its
operations or financial condition.
77
When it is possible to make a reasonable estimate of the liability with respect to such a matter, a
provision will be made as appropriate. Actual cost to be incurred in future periods may vary from
these estimates. Based on facts presently known, ARI does not believe that the outcome of these
proceedings will have a material adverse effect on its future liquidity, results of operations or
financial position.
ARI is a party to collective bargaining agreements with labor unions at its Longview, Texas repair
facility, its North Kansas City, Missouri repair facility and at its Longview, Texas steel foundry
and components manufacturing facility. These agreements expire in January 2010, September 2010, and
April 2011, respectively. ARI is also party to a collective bargaining agreement at its idled
Milton, Pennsylvania repair facility, which expired on June 19, 2005. The contract provisions under
the agreement provide that the contract would remain in effect under the old terms until terminated
by either party with 60 days notice. As of December 31, 2008, this agreement had not been
terminated.
ARI has been named the defendant in a lawsuit, OCI Chemical Corporation v. American Railcar
Industries, Inc., in which the plaintiff, OCI Chemical Company (OCI), claims the Company was
responsible for the damage caused by allegedly defective railcars that were manufactured by ARI.
The lawsuit was filed on September 19, 2005, in the United States District Court, Eastern District
of Missouri. Mediation on November 24, 2008, was not successful. Another mediation is scheduled to
take place on March 9, 2009 and trial has been scheduled for April 13, 2009. The Company believes
that it is not responsible for the damage and has meritorious defenses against such liability.
While it is reasonably possible that this case could result in a loss, there is not sufficient
information to estimate the amount of such loss, if any, resulting from the lawsuit.
ARI has been named the defendant in a wrongful death lawsuit, Jennifer Nicole Lerma v. American
Railcar Industries, Inc. The lawsuit was filed on August 17, 2007, in the Circuit Court of Greene
County, Arkansas Civil Division. Mediation on January 6, 2009, was not successful and trial is
scheduled for August 4, 2009. The Company believes that it is not responsible and has meritorious
defenses against such liability. While it is reasonably possible that this case could result in a
loss, there is not sufficient information to estimate the amount of such loss, if any, resulting
from the lawsuit.
Certain claims, suits and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business have been filed or
are pending against ARI. In the opinion of management, all such claims, suits, and complaints
arising in the ordinary course of business are without merit or would not have a significant effect
on the future liquidity, results of operations or financial position of ARI if disposed of
unfavorably.
The Company entered into two vendor supply contracts with minimum volume commitments in October
2005 with suppliers of materials used at its railcar production facilities. The agreements have a
minimum purchase volume requirement over the life of the contracts totaling $65.0 million. In 2006,
2007 and 2008 combined, ARI purchased
$61.6 million under these two contracts and in 2009 ARI expects to purchase $3.4 million under
these agreements.
In 2005, ARI entered into supply agreements with a supplier for two types of steel plate. The
agreements are for five years and are cancelable by either party, with proper notice after two
years. The agreement commits ARI to buy a percentage of its production needs from this supplier at
prices that fluctuate with market conditions.
In 2006, we entered into an agreement with two parties, including one of the members of the Ohio
Castings joint venture and an affiliate of one of the members of the Ohio Castings joint venture,
to purchase a minimum of 60.0% of certain of the Companys railcar component requirements for the
years 2007, 2008 and 2009.
In July 2007, ARI entered into an agreement with its joint venture, Axis, to purchase all of its
requirements of new railcar axles from a facility to be constructed by the joint venture.
Operations are expected to begin in the second quarter of 2009.
78
During August 2008, the Company entered into contracts to purchase a fixed volume of natural gas
for a period of twelve months, of which, a portion of the volume was agreed to at a fixed price for
a period of six months beginning in October 2008. The objective of entering into this contract was
to fix the price of a portion of the Companys purchases of this commodity it uses in the
manufacturing process. In 2008, the Company purchased $2.9 million of natural gas under these
contracts and expect to purchase $0.7 million in 2009.
In October 2008, the Company entered into a foreign currency option to purchase CAD for $5.3
million USD from October 2008 through April 2009, with fixed exchange rates and exchange limits
each month. In 2008, the Company purchased CAD for $2.0 million USD. The Company has committed to
purchase CAD for $3.3 million USD in 2009.
Note 18 Initial Public Offering
On January 24, 2006, the Company completed the sale of 9,775,000 shares of common stock to the
public pursuant to an effective registration statement at a price of $21.00 per share. The
offering resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of $205.3 million. Expenses related to the
offering were $13.3 million for underwriting discounts and commissions. The Company received net
proceeds of $192.0 million in the offering.
The net proceeds from the offering were applied as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of all oustanding shares of preferred stock |
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
Repayment of notes due to affiliates |
|
|
20.5 |
|
Repayment of all industrial revenue bonds |
|
|
8.6 |
|
Repayment of amounts outstanding under revolving credit facility |
|
|
32.3 |
|
Acquisition of Custom Steel |
|
|
17.2 |
|
Payment of payables in connection with acquisition |
|
|
5.3 |
|
Investment in plant, property and equipment |
|
|
12.7 |
|
Offering costs paid during the first quarter |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total uses |
|
$ |
192.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 19 Earnings per Share
The shares used in the computation of the Companys basic and diluted earnings per common share are
reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding |
|
|
21,302,296 |
|
|
|
21,274,082 |
|
|
|
20,666,599 |
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock options |
|
|
|
(1)(2) |
|
|
82,609 |
(2) |
|
|
66,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
21,302,296 |
|
|
|
21,356,691 |
|
|
|
20,732,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock options to purchase 390,353 shares of common stock were not included in the calculation
for diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2008. These options would have
resulted in an antidilutive effect to the earnings per share calculation. |
|
(2) |
|
Stock options to purchase 75,000 shares of common stock granted during the second quarter of
2006 were not included in the calculation for diluted earnings per share for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. These options would have resulted in an antidilutive effect to
the earnings per share calculation. During 2008, these stock options were forfeited/cancelled
without exercise. |
79
Note 20 Stock Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation granted under the 2005 equity incentive plan, as
amended (the 2005 Plan) under the recognition and measurement principles of SFAS 123(R) and its
related provisions. Stock-based compensation is expensed using a graded vesting method over the
vesting period of the instrument.
The 2005 Plan permits the Company to issue stock and grant stock options, restricted stock, stock
units and other equity interests to purchase or acquire up to 1.0 million shares of the Companys
common stock. Awards covering no more than 300,000 shares may be granted to any person during any
fiscal year. Options and SARs are subject to certain vesting provisions as designated by the board
of directors and may have an expiration period that ranges from 5 to 10 years. Options and SARs
granted under the 2005 Plan must have an exercise price at or above the fair market value on the
date of grant. If any award expires, or is terminated, surrendered or forfeited, then shares of
common stock covered by the award will again be available for grant under the 2005 Plan. The 2005
Plan is administered by the Companys board of directors or a committee of the board. Options and
SARs granted pursuant to the requirements of SFAS 123(R) are expensed on a graded vesting method
over the vesting period of the option.
The following table presents the amounts for stock based compensation expense incurred by ARI and
the corresponding line items on the statement of operations that they are classified within:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Stock based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue: manufacturing operations |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
Cost of revenue: railcar services |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and other |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
7,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock based compensation expense |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
1,927 |
|
|
$ |
8,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 includes $0.7 million and $3.0 million,
respectively of income tax benefits related to the Companys stock-based compensation arrangements.
Income tax benefits related to stock-based compensation arrangements were less than $0.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Stock options
In January 2006, on the date of the initial public offering, the Company granted options to
purchase 484,876 shares of common stock under the 2005 Plan. These options were granted at an
exercise price equal to the initial public offering price of $21.00 per share. The options have an
expiration term of five years and vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period. The
Company determined the fair value of these options using a Black-Scholes calculation based on the
following assumptions: stock volatility of 35.0%; 5-year term; interest rate of 4.35%; and dividend
yield of 1.0%. As there was no history with the stock prices of the Company, the stock volatility
rate was determined using volatility rates for several other similar companies within the railcar
industry. The five year term represents the expiration of each option. The interest rate used was
the five year government Treasury bill rate on the date of grant. Dividend yield was determined
from an average of other companies in the industry, as the Company did not have a history of
dividend rates.
In April 2006, the Company issued options to purchase a total of 75,000 shares of common stock
under the 2005 Plan. These options were granted at an exercise price of $35.69 per share, the
closing stock price on the date of the grant. These options have a four year vesting period and a
five year expiration period. The Company determined the fair value using the same assumptions and
methodology as was used for the options issued in connection with the Companys initial public
offering. During 2008, the Companys former Chief Financial Officer, William Benac, resigned
causing the cancellation of these options resulting in the recognition of $0.4 million of income
from the reversal of expense recorded in accordance with SFAS 123(R).
80
No stock options were granted in 2007 and 2008.
The Company recognized $0.5 million (exclusive of $0.4 million gain related to cancellation), $1.3
million and $2.4 million, respectively, of compensation expense during the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 related to stock option grants made under the 2005 Plan. The Company recognized
income tax benefits related to stock options of $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, during
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Income tax benefits related to stock options were less
than $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The following is a summary of option activity under the 2005 Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Grant-date |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Covered by |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
of Options |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
($000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2006 |
|
|
559,876 |
|
|
$ |
22.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
559,876 |
|
|
$ |
22.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised in 2007 |
|
|
(94,523 |
) |
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
465,353 |
|
|
$ |
23.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled in 2008 |
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
390,353 |
|
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
|
24 months |
|
$ |
7.28 |
|
|
$ |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
228,726 |
|
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
|
24 months |
|
$ |
7.28 |
|
|
$ |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Options to purchase 390,353 shares, of which 228,726 are exercisable, of the Companys common
stock have exercise prices that are above market price, based on the closing market price of $10.53
for a share of the
Companys common stock on the last business day of the year ended December 31, 2008. |
No options were exercised in 2008. Options to purchase 94,523 shares of the Companys common stock
were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2007. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the year ended December 31, 2007, was $1.3 million. The Company realized a tax
benefit of $0.5 million related to these option exercises. No options were exercised during 2006 as
options first became exercisable in January 2007.
All outstanding options will be vested as of January 19, 2009, thus all compensation costs related
to the vested and unvested portion of stock options have been recognized as of December 31, 2008.
As of December 31, 2008, an aggregate of 515,124 shares were available for issuance in connection
with future equity instrument grants under the Companys 2005 Plan.
Shares issued under the 2005 Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares
or treasury shares. The 1,000,000 shares covered by the Plan were registered for issuance to the
public with the SEC on a Form S-8 on August 16, 2006.
Restricted stock award
During 2006, the Company issued 285,714 restricted shares of the Companys common stock to its
Chief Executive Officer. These restricted shares were granted at the initial public offering price
of $21.00 and became fully vested in January 2007. All shares under this grant are now transferable
without contractual restrictions.
The Company recognized $0.3 million and $5.7 million of compensation expense during the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, for this restricted stock grant. The Company recognized
$0.1 million and $2.1 million of income tax benefits in the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, for this restricted stock grant. No compensation expense or related income tax
benefits were recognized during 2008 for this restricted stock grant.
81
The following is a summary of the status and activity related to non-vested shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Non-vested |
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted in 2006 |
|
|
285,714 |
|
|
|
21.00 |
|
Vested in 2006 |
|
|
(114,286 |
) |
|
|
21.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
171,428 |
|
|
|
21.00 |
|
Vested in 2007 |
|
|
(171,428 |
) |
|
|
21.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2007 and 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within the Form S-8 filed with the SEC on August 16, 2006, the Company registered for resale
114,286 shares of restricted stock that vested in January 2006.
Stock appreciation rights
The compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company granted awards of stock
appreciation rights (SARs) to certain employees pursuant to the 2005 Plan, as amended, during April
2007, April 2008 and September 2008.
All of the SARs granted in 2007 and 195,400 of the SARs granted in 2008 vest in 25.0% increments on
the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. Each holder must remain
employed by the Company through
each such date in order to vest in the corresponding number of SARs.
Additionally, 77,500 of the SARs granted in 2008 similarly vest in 25.0% increments on the first,
second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, but only if the closing price of the
Companys common stock achieves a specified price target during the preceding calendar year for
twenty trading days during any sixty day trading day period. If the Companys common stock does not
achieve the specified price target during any such calendar year, the applicable portion of these
performance-based SARs will not vest. Each holder must further remain employed by the Company
through each anniversary of the grant date in order to vest in the corresponding number of SARs.
The SARs have exercise prices that represent the closing price of the Companys common stock on the
date of grant. Upon the exercise of any SAR, the Company shall pay the holder, in cash, an amount
equal to the excess of (A) the aggregate fair market value (as defined in the Plan) in respect of
which the SARs are being exercised, over (B) the aggregate exercise price of the SARs being
exercised, in accordance with the terms of the Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement (the SAR
Agreement). The SARs are subject in all respects to the terms and conditions of the Plan and the
SAR Agreement, which contain non-solicitation, non-competition and confidentiality provisions.
82
The following table provides an analysis of SARs granted in 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Grants |
|
|
2007 Grant |
|
Grant date |
|
|
4/28/2008 & 9/12/2008 |
|
|
|
4/4/2007 |
|
# SARs outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
251,088 |
|
|
|
254,000 |
|
Weighted Avg Exercise price |
|
|
$20.81 |
|
|
|
$29.49 |
|
Contractual term |
|
7 years |
|
7 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 SARs Black Scholes Valuation Components: |
Stock volatility range |
|
|
41.5% 46.0% |
|
|
|
44.2% 51.2% |
|
Expected life range |
|
3.3 5.2 years |
|
2.7 3.8 years |
Risk free interest rate range |
|
|
0.9% 1.5% |
|
|
|
0.9% |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.4% |
|
|
|
0.4% |
|
Forfeiture rate |
|
|
9.0% |
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
The exercise prices represent the closing price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.
The SARs have a term of seven years. As there was not adequate history with the stock prices of the
Company at the time of the grant, the stock volatility rate was determined using historical
volatility rates for several other similar companies within the railcar industry. The expected life
ranges represent the use of the simplified method prescribed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 and SAB No. 110, which uses the average
of the vesting period and expiration period of each group of SARs that vest equally over a
four-year period. The interest rates used were the government Treasury bill rate on the date of
valuation. Dividend yield was determined using the historical dividend rate of the Company. The
forfeiture rate used was based on a Company estimate of expected forfeitures over the contractual
life of each grant of SARs for each period.
The following is a summary of SARs activity under the 2005 Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Appreciation |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Rights |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(SARs) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Value of SARs |
|
|
($000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
273,800 |
|
|
$ |
29.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
273,800 |
|
|
$ |
29.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
274,400 |
|
|
$ |
20.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited (2) |
|
|
(43,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
504,526 |
|
|
$ |
25.18 |
|
|
70 months |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
63,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock appreciation rights with an exercise price of $29.49, $20.88 and $16.46 have no
intrinsic value based on the closing market price of $10.53 for a share of the Companys common
stock on the last business day of the year ended December 31, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2008, 19,374 SARs of those granted in 2008 forfeited due to the closing price of the
Companys common stock not achieving a specified price target for twenty trading days during any
sixty day trading day period. |
83
Compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2008, was less than $0.1 million and $0.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2007, related to stock appreciation rights granted under
the 2005 Plan. The Company recognized income tax benefits related to stock appreciation rights of
$0.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2007, and income tax benefits were less than $0.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
As of December 31, 2008, unrecognized compensation costs related to the unvested portion of stock
appreciation rights were $0.3 million and were expected to be recognized over a period of 38
months.
Note 21 Common Stock and New Preferred Stock
On January 24, 2006, the Company completed the sale of 9,775,000 shares of common stock to the
public pursuant to an effective registration statement at a price of $21.00 per share. In
connection with the offering, the Company redeemed all new preferred stock, including accrued
dividends of $11.9 million, for a total of $94.0 million.
During each quarter of 2006, 2007 and 2008, the board of directors of the Company declared and paid
cash dividends of $0.03 per share of common stock of the Company to shareholders of record as of a
given date.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company issued 94,523 shares of its common stock as
certain holders of stock options exercised options to purchase the Companys common stock.
Note 22 Related Party Transactions
Agreements with ACF
The Company has the following agreements with ACF, a company controlled by Mr. Carl C. Icahn, the
Companys principal beneficial stockholder and the chairman of the Companys board of directors:
Manufacturing services agreement
Under the manufacturing services agreement entered into in 1994 and amended in 2005, ACF agreed to
manufacture and distribute, at the Companys instruction, various railcar components. In
consideration for these services, the Company agreed to pay ACF based on agreed upon rates. In the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, ARI purchased inventory of $44.7 million, $46.9
million and $81.5 million, respectively, of components from ACF. The agreement automatically renews
unless written notice is provided by the Company.
Supply agreement
Under a supply agreement entered into in 1994, the Company agreed to manufacture and sell to ACF
specified components at cost plus mark-up or on terms not less favorable than the terms on which
the Company sold the same products to third parties. Revenue recorded under this arrangement was
$0.2 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006. Such amounts are included under manufacturing operations revenue from affiliates on
the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Profit margins on sales to related parties approximate
the margins on sales to other large customers.
Inventory storage agreements
In 2006, ARI entered into two inventory storage agreements with ACF to store designated inventory
that ARI had purchased under its manufacturing services agreement with ACF at ACFs facility. Under
this agreement, ACF holds the inventory at its facility in segregated locations until such time
that the inventory is shipped to ARI.
Wheel set agreements
In 2006, ARI entered into an agreement that provided for ARI to procure, purchase and own the raw
material components for wheel sets. These wheel set components are those that are being used in the
assembly of wheel sets for ARI under the ARI/ACF manufacturing services agreement. Under the
manufacturing services agreement with ACF, which remains unchanged, ARI will continue to pay ACF
for its services, specifically labor and overhead, in assembling the wheel sets.
84
Railcar manufacturing agreement
In May 2007, the Company entered into a manufacturing agreement with ACF, pursuant to which the
Company agreed to purchase certain of its requirements for tank railcars from ACF. Under the terms
of the manufacturing agreement, ARI has agreed to purchase at least 1,388 tank railcars from ACF
with delivery expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2009. During the second quarter of
2007, ARI received new customer orders to support the tank railcars to be produced under the
manufacturing agreement. The profit realized by ARI upon sale of the tank railcars to ARI customers
was first paid to ACF to reimburse it for the start-up costs involved in implementing the
manufacturing arrangements evidenced by the agreement and thereafter, ARI has and will pay ACF half
the profits realized. Prior to its termination by ACF as described below, the term of the agreement
was for five years. Either party had the right to terminate the agreement before its fifth
anniversary upon six months prior written notice, with certain exceptions. The agreement may also
be terminated immediately upon the happening of certain extraordinary events.
On September 23, 2008, a termination letter was received from ACF regarding this agreement
effective the later of the completion of 1,388 tank railcars or March 23, 2009.
In the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, ARI incurred costs under this agreement of $24.2
million and $4.1 million, respectively, in connection with railcars that were manufactured and
delivered to customers during that period, which includes payments made to ACF for its share of the
profits along with ARI costs and such amount is included under cost of goods sold on the statement
of operations. The Company recognized revenue of $100.3 million and $17.3 million related to
railcars shipped under this agreement for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Other agreements
ARI entered into a note payable with ACF Holding, an affiliate, for $12.0 million effective January
1, 2005, in connection with the purchase of Castings (Note 1). The note bears interest at prime plus 0.5% and
is due on demand. This note was paid off in full in connection with the initial public offering in
January 2006. Interest expense on this note was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
In April 2005, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with ACF in which both parties
agreed to provide labor, litigation, labor relations support and consultation, and labor contract
interpretation and negotiation services to one another. In addition, the Company has agreed to
provide ACF with engineering and consulting advice. Fees paid to one another are based on agreed
upon rates. No services were rendered and no amounts were paid during the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006.
Agreements with ARL
The Company has or had the following agreements with ARL, a company controlled by Mr. Carl C.
Icahn, the Companys principal beneficial stockholder and the chairman of the Companys board of
directors:
Railcar servicing agreement and fleet services agreement
Under a railcar servicing agreement entered into in 2005, the Company agreed to provide ARL with
railcar repair and maintenance services, fleet management services and consulting services on
safety and environmental matters for railcars owned or managed by ARL and leased or held for lease
by ARL. ARL agreed to compensate the Company based on agreed upon rates. Revenue of $16.0 million
and $18.6 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, was recorded under
this arrangement. These amounts are included under railcar services revenue from affiliates on the
statement of operations. Profit margins on sales to related parties approximate the margins on
sales to other large customers.
Effective as of January 1, 2008, the Company entered into a new fleet services agreement with ARL,
which replaced the 2005 railcar servicing agreement described above. The new agreement reflects a
reduced level of fleet management services, relating primarily to logistics management services,
for which ARL now pays a fixed monthly fee. Additionally, under the new agreement, the Company
continues to provide railcar repair and maintenance services to ARL for a charge of labor,
components and materials. The Company currently provides such repair and maintenance services for
approximately 26,000 railcars for ARL. The new agreement extends through December 31, 2010, and is
automatically renewed for additional one year periods unless either party gives at least sixty
days prior notice of termination. There is no termination fee if the Company elects to terminate
the new agreement. Revenue of $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, was recorded
under this agreement. Such amounts are included under railcar services revenue from affiliates on
the consolidated statement of operations. Profit margins on sales to related parties approximate
the margins on sales to other customers.
85
Services agreement, separation agreement and rent and building services extension agreement
Under the Companys services agreement with ARL, ARL agreed to provide the Company certain
information technology services, rent and building services and limited administrative services.
The rent and building services includes the use of certain facilities owned by the Companys Chief
Executive Officer, which is further described later in this footnote. Under this agreement, the
Company agreed to provide purchasing and engineering services to ARL. Consideration exchanged
between the companies is based on an agreed upon fixed annual fee.
On March 30, 2007, ARI and ARL agreed, pursuant to a separation agreement, to terminate, effective
December 31, 2006, all services provided to ARL by the Company under the services agreement.
Additionally, the separation agreement provided that all services provided to the Company by ARL
under the services agreement would be terminated except for rent and building services. Under the
separation agreement, ARL agreed to waive the six month notice requirement for termination required
by the services agreement.
In February 2008, ARI and ARL agreed, pursuant to an extension agreement, that effective December
31, 2007, all rent and building services would continue unless otherwise terminated by either party
upon six months prior notice or by mutual agreement between the parties.
Total fees paid to ARL were $0.6 million, $0.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively, for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. The Company did not bill ARL in the years ended December 31, 2007 or 2006
as no services were performed under this agreement for ARL. The fees paid to ARL are included in
selling, administrative and other costs to affiliates on the statement of operations.
Trademark license agreement
Under this agreement, which is effective as of June 30, 2005, ARI granted a nonexclusive,
perpetual, worldwide license to ARL to use ARIs common law trademarks American Railcar and the
diamond shape logo. ARL may only use the licensed trademarks in connection with the railcar
leasing business. ARI is entitled to annual fees of $1,000 in exchange for this license.
Sales contracts
On March 31, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with ARL for the Company to manufacture
and ARL to purchase 1,000 railcars in 2007. The Company, prior to this agreement had manufactured
and sold railcars to ARL on a purchase order basis. The agreement also included options for ARL to
purchase up to 300 railcars in 2007 and 1,400 railcars in 2008. The option to purchase 1,400
railcars in 2008 was exercised by ARL. ARL also exercised its option to purchase 71 railcars in
2007. Revenue for these railcars sold to ARL is included under manufacturing revenue from
affiliates on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. Profit margins on sales to
related parties approximate the margins on sales to other large customers.
In September 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with ARL for the Company to manufacture
and ARL to purchase 500 railcars in both 2008 and 2009.
86
Agreements with other affiliated parties
During December 2004, ARI borrowed $7.0 million under a note payable to Arnos Corp., an affiliate
of ARI. The note was interest bearing at prime plus 1.8% and was payable on demand. Interest
expense on the note was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This note was paid in
full in connection with the initial public offering in January 2006.
In September 2003, Castings loaned Ohio Castings $3.0 million under a promissory note, which was
due in January 2004. The note was renegotiated resulting in a new principal amount of $2.2 million
and bears interest at 4.0%. Payments of principal and interest are due quarterly with the last
payment due in August 2009. This note receivable is included in investment in joint venture on the
accompanying balance sheet. Total amounts due from Ohio Castings under this note were $0.5 million
and $1.2 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In connection with the Companys investment in Ohio Castings, ARI has a guarantee on bonds
amounting to $10.0 million issued by the State of Ohio to Ohio Castings, of which $3.1 million was
outstanding as of December 31, 2008. ARI also has a guarantee of a $2.0 million state loan that
provides for purchases of capital equipment, of which $0.9 million was outstanding as of December
31, 2008. The two other partners of Ohio Castings have made identical guarantees of these
obligations.
During April 2006, the Companys chairman and majority stockholder, Mr. Carl C. Icahn, contributed
$0.3 million as a capital contribution to pay the weekly payroll and fringe benefits of the
Marmaduke manufacturing facility. This was done to help bridge the gap until the Company received
funds from its insurance policies to continue to pay full wages and benefits to all employees
working for the tank railcar operations at Marmaduke, Arkansas that were temporarily shutdown as a
result of the tornado that struck the facility as described in Note 24.
The Company leases certain facilities from an entity owned by its Chief Executive Officer. Expenses
paid to related parties for these facilities were $1.0 million, $0.9 million and $0.8 million,
respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. These costs are included in
costs of manufacturing operations as well as selling, administrative and other costs from
affiliates on the consolidated statement of operations.
One of the Companys joint ventures, Axis, entered into a credit agreement in December 2007. In
connection with this event, the Company agreed to a 50.0% guaranty of Axis obligation under its
credit agreement during the construction and start-up phases of the facility. Subject to its terms and conditions, the guaranty
will terminate on the first to occur of (i) the repayment in full of the guaranteed obligations or
(ii) after the facility has been in continuous production at a level sufficient to meet the
facilitys projected financial performance and in any event not less than 365 consecutive days from
the certified completion of the facilitys construction. As of December 31, 2008, Axis had
approximately $48.7 million outstanding under the credit agreement of which the Companys exposure
is 50.0%. The Companys guaranty has a maximum exposure related to it of $35.0 million, exclusive
of any capitalized interest, fees, costs and expenses. The Companys initial partner in the joint
venture has made an identical guarantee relating to this credit agreement.
In July 2007, ARI entered into an agreement with its joint venture, Axis, to purchase all of its
requirements of railcar axles from a facility to be constructed by the joint venture. Operations
are not expected to begin until the second quarter of 2009.
Financial information for transactions with affiliates
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, amounts due from affiliates were $10.3 million and $17.2 million
in accounts receivable from ACF, Ohio Castings, ARL and Axis.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, amounts due to affiliates included $5.2 million and $2.9 million,
respectively, in accounts payable to ACF and ARL.
Cost of railcar manufacturing for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 included $73.6
million, $41.2 million and $37.1 million, respectively, in railcar products produced by Ohio
Castings. Expenses of $0.1 million paid to Castings under a supply agreement are included in the
cost of manufacturing operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Inventory at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 includes $4.9 million, $3.7 million and $4.1 million,
respectively, of purchases from Ohio Castings. Approximately $0.4 million, $0.5 million and $0.1
million of costs, respectively, were eliminated at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 as it
represented profit from a related party for inventory still on hand.
87
Note 23 Operating Segment and Sales/Credit Concentrations
ARI operates in two reportable segments: manufacturing operations and railcar services. Performance
is evaluated based on revenue and operating profit. Intersegment sales and transfers are accounted
for as if sales or transfers were to third parties. The information in the following tables is
derived from the segments internal financial reports used for corporate management purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the year ended |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Railcar |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Operations |
|
|
Services |
|
|
& all other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
757,505 |
|
|
$ |
51,301 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
808,806 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue external customers |
|
|
(682,744 |
) |
|
|
(41,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(724,397 |
) |
Cost of intersegment revenue |
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
74,898 |
|
|
|
9,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
84,409 |
|
Selling, administration and other |
|
|
(7,655 |
) |
|
|
(2,551 |
) |
|
|
(16,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
67,243 |
|
|
$ |
7,123 |
|
|
$ |
(16,329 |
) |
|
$ |
(163 |
) |
|
$ |
57,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
351,037 |
|
|
$ |
40,246 |
|
|
$ |
288,371 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
679,654 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
42,163 |
|
|
|
7,396 |
|
|
|
2,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,432 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
17,513 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the year ended |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Railcar |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Operations |
|
|
Services |
|
|
& all other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
648,124 |
|
|
$ |
50,003 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
698,127 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue external customers |
|
|
(568,023 |
) |
|
|
(41,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(609,063 |
) |
Cost of intersegment revenue |
|
|
(819 |
) |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
80,263 |
|
|
|
9,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
89,064 |
|
Selling, administration and other |
|
|
(7,667 |
) |
|
|
(2,123 |
) |
|
|
(17,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
72,596 |
|
|
$ |
6,878 |
|
|
$ |
(17,589 |
) |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
$ |
61,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
320,313 |
|
|
$ |
37,243 |
|
|
$ |
296,828 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
654,384 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
53,518 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,367 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,121 |
|
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,765 |
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the year ended |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Railcar |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Operations |
|
|
Services |
|
|
& all other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
597,913 |
|
|
$ |
48,139 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
646,052 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue external customers |
|
|
(537,344 |
) |
|
|
(38,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(575,364 |
) |
Cost of intersegment revenue |
|
|
(1,655 |
) |
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
60,768 |
|
|
|
10,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
70,688 |
|
Income related to insurance
recoveries, net |
|
|
9,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,946 |
|
Gain on asset conversion, net |
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
Selling, administration and other |
|
|
(5,990 |
) |
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
|
|
(20,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
69,047 |
|
|
$ |
8,603 |
|
|
$ |
(20,564 |
) |
|
$ |
(528 |
) |
|
$ |
56,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
255,169 |
|
|
$ |
33,764 |
|
|
$ |
49,993 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
338,926 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
43,415 |
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,916 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,747 |
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,801 |
|
Manufacturing Operations
Manufacturing revenues from affiliates were 22.6%, 20.1% and 7.7% of total consolidated revenues
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Manufacturing revenues from one unaffiliated significant customer totaled 44.7%, 51.6% and 40.6% of
total consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Manufacturing revenues from two significant customers were 67.4%, 71.7% and 48.8% of total
consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Manufacturing receivables from one affiliated significant customer were 22.9% of total consolidated
accounts receivable at December 31, 2008. Manufacturing receivables from one unaffiliated
significant customer were 31.3% of total consolidated accounts receivable at December 31, 2007.
Manufacturing receivables from two significant customers were 62.9% and 51.2% of total consolidated
accounts receivable at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Railcar Services
Railcar services revenues from affiliates were 1.9%, 2.3% and 2.9% of total consolidated revenues
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. No single railcar services
customer accounted for more than 10.0% of total consolidated revenue for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006. No single railcar services customer accounted
for more than 10.0% of total
consolidated accounts receivable as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Note 24 Marmaduke Storm Damage Insurance Claim (Income related to insurance recoveries)
On April 2, 2006, a tornado struck the Marmaduke, Arkansas area, causing damage to the companys
tank railcar manufacturing complex in Marmaduke, Arkansas. While the majority of the Marmaduke tank
railcar complex suffered only minor damage, the portion of the factory that processed inbound
material, equipment associated with material handling, plate steel blasting and sheet rolling as
well as some inventory was destroyed by the storm. The tornado also destroyed an empty building
that was nearing completion to receive inbound material and store inventory. The manufacturing
complex was closed from April 2, 2006 through August 6, 2006 due to the storm. The Company
recommenced operations at the manufacturing complex on August 7, 2006 when the repairs related to
the tornado damage were substantially complete.
89
The Company was covered by property insurance covering damage to its property, as well as
incremental costs and operating expenses it incurred due to damage caused by the tornado. In
addition, the Company was covered by insurance for business interruption as a direct result of the
insured damage. The Companys deductibles on these policies were $0.1 million for property
insurance and a $0.6 million business interruption insurance deductible.
The final property damage claim amounted to $11.2 million (prior to the deductible) covering clean
up costs, repair costs and asset replacement costs. The final business interruption claim amounted
to $16.0 million (prior to the deductible) covering continuing expenses, employee wages and
estimated lost profits for April through August 2006.
ARI received proceeds of $11.1 million from the insurance carrier related to the property damage
claim. This cash has been classified as cash received for investing activities and cash received
for operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. ARI received proceeds of
$15.4 million related to the business interruption claim. This cash has been classified as cash
received for operating activities as the advances were for ongoing normal business operations and
lost profits.
The Company had assets with a net book value of $4.3 million damaged or destroyed by the tornado.
Other costs incurred related to the tornado damage included clean up for the temporary shutdown of
the complex. The write off of assets and associated cleanup costs have been netted against the
insurance settlement of the property damage claim to arrive at the gain on asset conversion, net.
The amounts recorded in the statement of operations relating to business interruption insurance
recoveries is set forth as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business interruption insurance claim |
|
$ |
15,968 |
|
Business interruption claim deductible |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Business interruption insurance settlement, net |
|
|
15,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing expenses |
|
|
(5,430 |
) |
Deductible adjustment |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income related to insurance recoveries, net |
|
$ |
9,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts recorded in the statement of operations relating to our property damage insurance
recoveries are set forth as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property damage insurance claim |
|
$ |
11,160 |
|
Property damage claim deductible |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property damage insurance settlement, net |
|
|
11,060 |
|
Assets damaged, clean up costs, repair costs |
|
|
(6,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on asset conversion, net |
|
$ |
4,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
90
Note 25 Supplemental Cash Flow Information
ARI received interest income of $7.8 million, $13.8 million and $1.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
ARI paid interest expense of $21.0 million, $9.5 million and $3.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
ARI paid taxes of $18.9 million, $20.4 million and $23.4 million for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
In the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company incurred stock based compensation expense of $0.5
million, exclusive of $0.4 million gain related to the cancellation of stock options, in connection
with various grants of stock options and SARs to certain employees.
In the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company incurred stock based compensation expense of $1.9
million in connection with various grants of stock based compensation arrangements including
restricted shares of common stock to the Companys Chief Executive Officer, stock options and SARs
to certain employees.
In the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company incurred stock based compensation expense of $5.7
million in connection with the initial public offering for the issuance of restricted shares of
common stock to the Companys Chief Executive Officer. The Companys stock option expense for the
year ended December 31, 2006 was $2.4 million.
In January 2006, in connection with the initial public offering, the Company incurred compensation
expense of $0.5 million related to a bonus for one of the Companys senior officers that was paid
in 2007.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, the board of directors declared a common stock dividend each quarter of
$0.03 per share to shareholders.
On January 1, 2007, ARI recorded a $1.6 million liability that was reclassed from a deferred tax
liability account related to the Companys unrecognized tax liability in accordance with FIN 48.
See Note 15 for further discussion.
On October 30, 2008, the board of directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per
share of common stock of the Company to shareholders of record as of January 9, 2009 that was paid
on January 23, 2009.
In November 2007, the board of directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per share
of common stock of the Company to shareholders of record as of January 8, 2008 that was paid on
January 18, 2008.
In December 2006, the board of directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per share
of common stock of the Company to shareholders of record as of January 8, 2007 that was paid on
January 19, 2007.
91
Note 26 Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Year to |
|
|
|
quarter |
|
|
quarter |
|
|
quarter |
|
|
quarter |
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
184,049 |
|
|
$ |
204,482 |
|
|
$ |
217,248 |
|
|
$ |
203,027 |
|
|
$ |
808,806 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
22,292 |
|
|
|
20,612 |
|
|
|
19,603 |
|
|
|
21,902 |
|
|
|
84,409 |
|
Net earnings available to common shareholders |
|
|
10,128 |
|
|
|
6,232 |
|
|
|
7,447 |
|
|
|
7,575 |
|
|
|
31,382 |
|
Net earnings per common share-basic |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
Net earnings per common share-diluted |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Year to |
|
|
|
quarter |
|
|
quarter |
|
|
quarter |
|
|
quarter |
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
187,343 |
|
|
$ |
208,997 |
|
|
$ |
139,891 |
|
|
$ |
161,896 |
|
|
$ |
698,127 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
27,981 |
|
|
|
25,691 |
|
|
|
15,972 |
|
|
|
19,420 |
|
|
|
89,064 |
|
Net earnings
available to
common
shareholders |
|
|
13,507 |
|
|
|
11,032 |
|
|
|
4,860 |
|
|
|
7,865 |
|
|
|
37,264 |
|
Net earnings per
common
share-basic |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
Net earnings per
common
share-diluted |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
Note 27 Subsequent Events
On March 3, 2009, the board of directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per share
of common stock of the Company to shareholders of record as of March 20, 2009 that will be paid on
April 2, 2009.
During January and February 2009, Longtrain paid $20.2 million to invest in corporate bonds that
mature in 2015 with interest payments semi-annually.
On March 3, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company granted
awards of Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) to certain Company employees pursuant to the Companys
2005 Plan. The Committee granted an aggregate of 304,900 SARs. The SARs will be settled in cash and
have an exercise price of $6.71, which was the closing price of the Companys common stock on the
date of grant. 211,650 SARs vest equally in 25% increments on the first, second, third and fourth
anniversaries of the grant date. 93,250 SARs vest equally in 25% increments on the first, second,
third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, but only if the closing price of the Companys
common stock achieves a specified price target for twenty
trading days during any sixty day trading day period
during the twelve month period preceding the applicable anniversary date.
If the Companys common stock does not
achieve the specified price target during the applicable
twelve month period, the applicable portion of these
performance-based SARs will not vest. Each holder must further remain employed by the Company
through each anniversary of the grant date in order to vest in the corresponding number of SARs.
The SARs have a term of seven years.
92
Item 9: Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A: Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, our management evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of
the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Evaluation Date). Based
upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our
last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. The Companys internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only
reasonable assurance, as opposed to absolute assurance, of achieving their internal control
objectives.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control
Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2008, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, has been
audited by Grant Thornton, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm, who also audited
the Companys consolidated financial statements. Grant Thorntons attestation report on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting is included herein.
Item 9B: Other Information
Change in executive leadership
As reported in an 8-K filed by the Company on March 4, 2009, James J. Unger will resign as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company effective April 1, 2009, but will continue to serve the Company as a consultant
beginning on that date. In this role, it is expected that Mr. Unger will, among other things, assist Mr. Cowan, ARIs
new Chief Executive Officer effective April 1, 2009, with the leadership transition, work to maintain key customer
relationships, participate in customer contract negotiations and assist with potential strategic transactions. Mr.
Unger will also continue as a member of the Companys Investment Committee, maintain his roles with the Companys joint
ventures and continue to represent the Company as a member of various railcar industry groups. Mr. Unger will remain on
the Companys Board of Directors and, effective April 1, 2009, will assume the role of Vice Chairman of the Board. In
exchange for these services, Mr. Unger will receive a consulting fee of $135,000 and a director fee of $65,000 that are
both payable quarterly, in advance, and the Company will continue to provide Mr. Unger with an automobile allowance.
In his role as consultant, Mr. Unger will report to and serve at
the discretion of the Companys Board.
93
2009 Base Salaries Increase
On
March 3, 2009, the board of directors Compensation
Committee (the Committee) approved the following new base salaries for the indicated
executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
Name |
|
Position |
|
Salaries |
James Cowan
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer (effective April 1, 2009)
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
Dale C. Davies
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
|
|
|
205,000 |
|
2009 Bonus Plan
At its March 3, 2009 meeting, the Committee also approved the Companys Management Incentive Plan
for 2009 (the Bonus Plan). The 2009 bonus amounts, if any, for the Companys named executive
officers will be based on a combination of financial targets for 2009 (adjusted EBITDA and return
on net assets) and a variety of other quantitative and qualitative criteria, including financial,
strategic, corporate, divisional and individual goals. The Committee retains sole discretion over
all matters relating to the potential 2009 bonus payments, including, without limitation, the
decision to pay any bonuses, the amount of each bonus, if any, and the ability to increase or
decrease any bonus payment and make changes to any performance measures or targets. Unless
otherwise approved by the Committee, no bonuses will be paid to any named executive officer who
ceases to be employed by the Company prior to the payment date.
In connection with the management transition described above, the Committee also approved a new
target bonus amount, as a percentage of base salary, for James Cowan
at 60.0%.
Stock Appreciation Rights
Also on March 3, 2009, the Committee granted awards of
stock appreciation rights (SARs) to certain employees pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan,
as amended (the Equity Incentive Plan). The Committee granted an aggregate of 304,900
SARs, of which 83,000 were granted to the Companys following named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Position |
|
Number of SARs |
James Cowan
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer (effective April 1, 2009) |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
Dale C. Davies
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
Alan C. Lullman
|
|
Senior Vice President Sales, Marketing and
Services
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
One half of the SARs issued to each of the above-named executive officers vest in 25% increments on
the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The remaining one half of such
SARs similarly vest in 25% increments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the
grant date, but only if the closing price of the Companys common stock achieves a specified price
target for twenty trading days during any sixty day trading day
period during the twelve month period preceding the applicable anniversary date.
If the Companys common stock does not achieve the specified price
target during the applicable twelve month period, the applicable portion of these performance-based SARs will
not vest. Each holder must further remain employed by the Company through each anniversary of the
grant date in order to vest in the corresponding number of SARs. The SARs have a term of seven
years.
The SARs will be settled in cash and have an exercise price of $6.71, the closing price of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant. Upon the exercise of any SAR, the Company shall pay
the holder, in cash, an amount equal to the excess of (A) the aggregate fair market value in
respect of which the SARs are being exercised, over (B) the aggregate exercise price of the SARs
being exercised. The SARs are subject in all respects to the terms and conditions of the Equity
Incentive Plan and the Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement evidencing the grant, which contain
non-solicitation, non-competition and confidentiality provisions.
94
PART III
Item 10: Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of the Registrant
Information regarding the directors of the Company is incorporated by reference to the information
set forth under the caption Election of Directors in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2009
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the 2009 Proxy Statement).
Information relating to the board of directors determinations concerning whether at least one of
the members of the Audit Committee is an audit committee financial expert as that term is defined
under Item 407 (d)(5) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the information set forth
under the caption Corporate Governance in the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement. Information
regarding the Companys Audit Committee is incorporated by reference to the information set forth
under the caption Corporate Governance in the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement.
Information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption Other Matters
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement.
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial
Officers that applies to all of its directors, officers, and employees. The Code of Business
Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers are on the Companys website at
www.americanrailcar.com under the caption Corporate Governance.
Item 11: Executive Compensation
Information regarding compensation of executive officers and directors is incorporated by reference
to the information set forth under the caption Executive Compensation in the Companys 2009 Proxy
Statement.
Information concerning compensation committee interlocks and insider participation is incorporated
by reference to the information set forth under the caption Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation in the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement. Information about the compensation
committee report is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption
Compensation Committee Report in the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement.
Item 12: Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement.
Item 13: Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information regarding certain relationships and related person transactions is incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the captions Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation and Transactions with Related Persons in the Companys 2009 Proxy
Statement. Information regarding the independence of directors is incorporated by reference to the
information set forth under the captions Director Independence and Controlled Company Status in
the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement.
95
Item 14: Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information regarding principal accounting fees and services is incorporated by reference to the
information set forth under the captions Fees Billed by Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm in our 2009 Proxy Statement.
Part IV
Item 15: Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) Financial Statements.
See Item 8.
(2) Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits for a listing of Exhibits, which are filed herewith or incorporated herein by
reference to the location indicated.
96
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Railcar Industries, Inc.
|
|
Date: March 6, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ James J. Unger
|
|
|
|
Name: |
James J. Unger |
|
|
|
Title: |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
/s/ James J. Unger
Name: James J. Unger
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) and Director
|
|
March 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dale C. Davies
Name: Dale C. Davies
|
|
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer (principal financial officer)
|
|
March 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael E. Vaughn
Name: Michael E. Vaughn
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller
(principal
accounting officer)
|
|
March 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Vincent J. Intrieri
Name: Vincent J. Intrieri
|
|
Director
|
|
March 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter K. Shea
Name: Peter K. Shea
|
|
Director
|
|
March 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James Pontious
Name: James Pontious
|
|
Director
|
|
March 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James Laisure
Name: James Laisure
|
|
Director
|
|
March 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brett Icahn
Name: Brett Icahn
|
|
Director
|
|
March 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harold First
Name: Harold First
|
|
Director
|
|
March 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hunter Gary
Name: Hunter Gary
|
|
Director
|
|
March 6, 2009 |
97
Exhibit index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger between American Railcar
Industries, Inc. (Missouri) and American Railcar
Industries, Inc. (Delaware) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.1 to ARIs Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on March 28, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 24, 2006 between
Steel Technologies, Inc. and ARI Acquisition Sub joined
in by American Railcar Industries (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.2 to ARIs Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of American Railcar
Industries, Inc. (Delaware) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to ARIs Registration Statement on Form
S-1, filed with the SEC on December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of American Railcar
Industries, Inc. (Delaware) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to ARIs Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger of American Railcar
Industries, Inc. (Missouri) and American Railcar
Industries, Inc. (Delaware) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.3 to ARIs Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on March 28, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of American Railcar
Industries, Inc. (Delaware) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to ARIs Registration Statement on Form
S-1, Amendment No. 1, filed with the SEC on January 4,
2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Indenture (Including the form of note), Dated as of
February 28, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.2 to ARIs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
SEC on March 1, 2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
Voting Agreement dated as of December 8, 2005 by and
between MODAL LLC and the Foundation for a Greater
Opportunity (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9.1
to ARIs Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment
No. 1, filed with the SEC on January 4, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Asset Transfer Agreement dated as of October 1, 1994 by
and among ACF Industries, Incorporated, American
Railcar Industries, Inc. and Carl C. Icahn
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ARIs
Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC
on December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
License
Agreement dated as of October 1, 1994 by and between ACF
Industries, Incorporated and American Railcar Industries, Inc. as
Licensee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ARIs
Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on
December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
License
Agreement dated as of October 1, 1994 by and between American
Railcar Industries, Inc. and ACF Industries, Incorporated as
Licensee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to ARIs
Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on
December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Manufacturing Services Agreement dated as of October 1,
1994 between ACF Industries, Incorporated and American
Railcar Industries, Inc., as ratified and amended on
June 30, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 to ARIs Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed
with the SEC on December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Railcar Servicing Agreement dated
as of June 30, 2005 between American Railcar
Industries, Inc. and American Railcar Leasing LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to ARIs
Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC
on December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
Business
Consultation Agreement for Human Resources Consultation between ACF
Industries LLC and American Railcar Industries, Inc. dated
April 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to
ARIs Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the
SEC on December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
Business
Consultation Agreement for Engineering Services between ACF
Industries LLC and American Railcar Industries, Inc. dated
April 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
ARIs Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the
SEC on December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
Amended and Restated
Services Agreement dated
as of June 30, 2005
between American Railcar
Leasing LLC and American
Railcar Industries, Inc.
(incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.12 to ARIs
Registration Statement
on Form S-1, filed with
the SEC on December 13,
2005). |
98
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
|
Indenture of Lease between St. Charles Properties and ACF Industries, Incorporated for the
property located at Clark and Second Streets, St. Charles, MO, dated March 1, 2001 together with
the Assignment and Assumption of Lease dated April 1, 2005 among ACF Industries LLC (as successor
to ACF Industries, Incorporated), American Railcar Industries, Inc. and St. Charles Properties
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to ARIs Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed
with the SEC on December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
|
Multi-Year Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 29, 2005 between American Railcar
Industries, Inc. and The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.18 to ARIs Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 2, filed with the SEC on January
11, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
Assignment and Assumption, Novation and Release dated as of June 30, 2005 by and between ACF
Industries Holding, Inc., American Railcar Industries, Inc., Gunderson Specialty Products, Inc.,
Gunderson, Inc., Castings, LLC, ASF-Keystone, Inc., Amsted Industries Incorporation and Ohio
Castings Company, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to ARIs Registration Statement
on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
Redemption Agreement between American Railcar Industries, Inc. and Vegas Financial Corp. dated as
of January 3, 2006. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to ARIs Registration Statement on
Form S-1, Amendment No. 1, filed with the SEC on January 4, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
Ohio Castings Company, LLC Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, dated as of
June 20, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to ARIs Registration Statement on Form
S-1, filed with the SEC on December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
|
Letter Agreement between American Railcar Industries, Inc. and James J. Unger, dated as of
November 18, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to ARIs Registration Statement on
Form S-1, filed with the SEC on December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
|
Employee Benefit Plan Agreement dated as of December 1, 2005 between American Railcar
Industries, Inc. and ACF Industries LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to
ARIs Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 1, filed with the SEC on
January 4, 2006). |
99
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
|
Trademark License Agreement dated as of June 30, 2005 by and between American Railcar
Industries, Inc. and American Railcar Leasing LLC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 to ARIs Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 1, filed with
the SEC on January 4, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
Summary Plan Description of Executive Survivor Insurance Plan Program of Insurance
Benefits for Salaried Employees of American Railcar Industries, Inc (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.33 to ARIs Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No.
1, filed with the SEC on January 4, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of American Railcar Industries, Inc
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to ARIs Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement among American Railcar Industries,
Inc., certain Lenders and North Fork Business Capital Corporation, as agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to ARIs Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
American Railcar, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.36 to ARIs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on May 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.37 |
|
|
Form of Option Agreement, as amended, under American Railcar Industries, Inc. 2005
Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to ARIs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, filed with the SEC
on May 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
American Railcar Industries, Inc. 2005 Executive Incentive Plan, as amended
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to ARIs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on May 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated March 31, 2006 between American Railcar Leasing LLC
and American Railcar Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to
ARIs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, filed with
the SEC on May 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40 |
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated October 6,
2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to ARIs Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 12, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.41 |
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 19, 2006 between American Railcar Leasing
LLC and American Railcar Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41
to ARIs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, filed
with the SEC on November 14, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.42 |
|
|
Wheel Set Component and Finished Wheel Set Storage Agreement dated November 13, 2006
between ACF Industries LLC and American Railcar Industries, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.42 to ARIs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2006, filed with the SEC on November 14, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of
February 12, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to ARIs Annual Report
on Form 10-K, as amended for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the
SEC on February 13, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44A |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 28, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.44 to ARIs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 1,
2007). |
100
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44B |
|
|
Employment Agreement with Alan C. Lullman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44
to ARIs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.45 |
|
|
ARI/ARL Services Separation Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to
ARIs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 5, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.46 |
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.46 to ARIs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 10, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47 |
|
|
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.47 to ARIs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on May 4, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
|
ACF Manufacturing Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to ARIs Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 22, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.50 |
|
|
Guaranty Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to ARIs Current Report
on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 4, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.51 |
|
|
Axis, LLC Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, dated as of
January 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to ARIs Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on February
22, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.52 |
|
|
ARI / ARL Rent and Building Services Extension Agreement, dated as of February 22,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to ARIs Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on February 22, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.53 |
|
|
Fleet Services Agreement with American Railcar Leasing, LLC, dated as of February 26,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to ARIs Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on May 12, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.54 |
|
|
Joint Venture Agreement by and between American Railcar Mauritius II and Amtek
Transportation Systems Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54 to ARIs
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 20, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.55 |
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.55 to ARIs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008,
filed with the SEC on August 8, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.56 |
|
|
Employment Agreement between American Railcar Industries, Inc. and Dale C. Davies,
dated as of September 12, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to ARIs
Current Report on Form8-K, filed with the SEC on September 16, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of American Railcar Industries, Inc.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.* |
101
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for the redacted portions of this agreement. A
complete copy of this agreement, including the redacted portions has been filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
102