Table Of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

OR

[    ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

0-19858

(Commission file number)

 

 

USA Truck, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	71-0556971
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

3200 Industrial Park Road
Van Buren, Arkansas	72956
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

 

(479) 471-2500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value	The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (NASDAQ Global Select Market)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [   ] No [ X ]

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [   ] No [ X ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [   ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ X ] No [   ]

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

[   ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large Accelerated Filer____	Accelerated Filer   ☒	Non-Accelerated Filer ____	Smaller Reporting Company ____
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [   ] No [ X ]

 

The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for these purposes that all executive officers, directors, and affiliated holders of more than 10% of the Registrant’s outstanding common stock are “affiliates” of the Registrant) as of June 30, 2015, the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $219,871,807 (based on the closing sale price of the Registrant's common stock on that date as reported by Nasdaq).

 

As of February 15, 2016, 9,758,733 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding.

 

 

USA TRUCK, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item No.		Caption		Page
		PART I
1.		Business		3
1A.		Risk Factors		10
1B.		Unresolved Staff Comments		19
2.		Properties		19
3.		Legal Proceedings		20
4.		Mine Safety Disclosures		20
		PART II
5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		20
6.		Selected Financial Data		22
7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		25
7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk		36
8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		37
9.		Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		58
9A.		Controls and Procedures		58
9B.		Other Information		60
		PART III
10.		Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		60
11.		Executive Compensation		60
12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		60
13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence		60
14.		Principal Accountant Fees and Services		60
		PART IV
15.		Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		61
		Signatures		63

 

 

Part I. 

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (this “Form 10-K”) contains certain statements that may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, and such statements are subject to the safe harbor created by those sections, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical or current fact, are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including without limitation:

●	any projections of earnings, revenue, or other financial items;

●	any statement of projected future operations or processes;

●	any statement of plans, strategies, and objectives of management for future operations;

●	any statement concerning proposed new services or developments;

●	any statement regarding future economic conditions or performance; and

●	any statement of belief and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

 

In this Form 10-K, statements relating to:

●	future insurance and claims experience;

●	future driver market;

●	future driver compensation;

●	future acquisitions and dispositions of revenue equipment;

●	future prices of revenue equipment;

●	future profitability;

●	future fuel prices, hedging arrangements, and efficiency;

●	our ability to recover costs through our fuel surcharge program;

●	future purchased transportation expense;

●	future operations and maintenance costs;

●	future depreciation and amortization;

●	future effects of inflation;

●	expected capital resources and sources of liquidity;

●	future indebtedness;

●	future share repurchases, if any;

●	future effects of restructuring activities;

●	expected capital expenditures; and

●	future income tax rates,

 

among others, are forward-looking statements. Such statements may be identified by their use of terms or phrases such as “expects,” “estimates,” “projects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “focus,” “intends,” “plans,” “goals,” “may,” “if,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “potential,” “continue,” “future” and similar terms and phrases. Forward-looking statements are based on currently available operating, financial, and competitive information. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified, which could cause future events and actual results to differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled “Item 1A., Risk Factors.” Readers should review and consider the factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Form 10-K, along with various disclosures in our press releases, stockholder reports, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

 

All such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in the events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such information is based.

 

All forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

 

References to the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and words of similar import refer to USA Truck, Inc., and its subsidiary.

  

   

Item 1.

BUSINESS

 

General

 

USA Truck is the nation's twenty-sixth largest truckload carrier based on 2014 operating revenue according to Transport Topics. In 2015, the Company generated $507.9 million in operating revenue and $23.1 million in operating income. As of December 31, 2015, the Company’s fleet of 1,832 tractors was comprised of 1,568 company tractors and 264 independent contractor tractors. The Company owned 6,200 trailers as of December 31, 2015.

 

The Company transports commodities throughout the continental United States and into and out of portions of Canada. USA Truck also transports general commodities into and out of Mexico by allowing through-trailer service from its terminal in Laredo, Texas. In addition to truckload and dedicated freight service offerings, the Company provides freight brokerage and rail intermodal service offerings through its Strategic Capacity Solutions (“SCS”) segment. USA Truck is headquartered in Van Buren, Arkansas, with terminals, offices, and staging facilities located throughout the United States.

 

The Company has two reportable segments: (i) trucking, consisting of the Company’s truckload and dedicated freight service offerings and (ii) SCS, consisting of the Company’s freight brokerage and rail intermodal service offerings. Based on several factors, including the relatively small size of the Company’s rail intermodal service offering and the interrelationship of the freight brokerage and rail intermodal operations, the Company aggregates its freight brokerage and rail intermodal service offerings into a single reportable segment. Financial information regarding these segments is provided in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

 

Truckload freight services utilize Company-owned equipment or equipment owned by independent contractors for the pick-up and delivery of freight. Truckload services transport freight over irregular routes as a medium-to long-haul common carrier. Dedicated freight services provides similar transportation services, but does so pursuant to agreements whereby the Company makes equipment available to a specific customer for shipments over particular routes at specified times.

 

SCS provides services which complement USA Truck’s trucking services, primarily to existing customers of its trucking segment. SCS represented approximately 30%, 30%, and 25% of USA Truck’s consolidated operating revenue in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

 

Long-Term Turnaround Plan

 

USA Truck’s top priorities remain improving its operating performance and increasing stockholder value. The Company’s long-term turnaround plan has three main components: profitable revenue, operational excellence, and cost effectiveness. During 2015, progress in executing the Company’s turnaround plan has contributed to a 160 basis point increase in operating margin versus 2014, positive cash flow, and our most profitable year since 2006. During 2014, the Company achieved a 470 basis point improvement in operating margin versus 2013.

 

Profitable Revenue: The Company continues to refine its freight network toward a more efficient mix of lanes and markets in its truckload business, particularly focusing on better utilization of Company tractors with an emphasis on key metrics, such as miles per seated truck per week and base trucking revenue per seated truck per week. Base trucking revenue per seated truck per week improved approximately 2.7% during 2015, compared to 2014.

 

Operational Excellence and Cost Effectiveness. During 2015, the Company continued to focus on improving customer service and cost reduction initiatives for fuel, maintenance, interest and debt costs, as well as other areas requiring cost containment. During 2015, the Company took steps to streamline and simplify its operations to better align the Company's cost structure and better serve its customers. In the Company's trucking segment, the Company closed its maintenance facilities in Denton, Texas and Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Additionally, the Company began to outsource its road assistance function to a third party during the fourth quarter of 2015. These initiatives are expected to improve operating productivity and enhance capacity utilization. The Company recognized approximately $2.7 million (pretax) in restructuring, severance and related charges. Going forward, the Company intends to focus on operational execution initiatives that it believes will improve safety performance, asset productivity, driver retention, fuel economy, maintenance operations and customer service.

 

 

The Company continued to make progress in executing its turnaround plan in 2015. Management believes that the Company is well-positioned to complete the turnaround plan of its trucking segment and generate long-term profitability. To increase stockholder value in 2016, the Company expects to evolve from the stated goal of sustained profitability to maximize the profitability of the business segments and increase the Company's return on invested capital.

 

Operations

 

The Company focuses significant marketing efforts on customers with premium service requirements and who have consistent shipping needs within USA Truck’s primary operating areas which are predominantly located in the eastern half of the United States. One or more of the Company’s service offerings are marketed to customers, with over 90% of the Company’s top 100 customers utilizing more than one service in 2015. This permits the strategic positioning of available equipment and allows the Company to provide its customers with a full array of transportation solutions. In addition, USA Truck team members have cultivated a thorough understanding of the needs of shippers in key industries. The Company believes this helps it develop long-term, service-oriented relationships with its customers.

 

USA Truck has a diversified freight and customer base. During 2015, the Company’s largest 5, 10, 25 and 50 customers comprised approximately 27%, 38%, 57% and 71% of its revenues, respectively. No single customer generated more than 10% of the Company’s revenues in 2015. The Company provided service to more than 900 customers in 2015 across all USA Truck service offerings.

 

While the Company prefers direct relationship with customers, obtaining shipments through other providers of transportation or logistics services is a significant opportunity. Securing freight through a third party enables USA Truck to provide services for high-volume shippers to which it might not otherwise have access because many of these shippers require their carriers to conduct business with their designated third party logistics provider.

 

Customers are billed at or shortly after delivery and, during 2015, receivables collection averaged approximately 38 days from the billing date, compared to an average of approximately 44 days and 40 days during 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in days to collection has resulted from various initiatives including improvements to the Company’s billing procedures, an increased focus on customers with aged receivables, improving communication with customers and improving efficiency in the Company’s internal collection process.

 

The Company primarily operates in the United States and operates in Mexico and Canada. Most of the Company’s operating revenue is generated from within the United States. During 2015, 2014 and 2013 approximately 8%, 10% and 10%, respectively, of the Company’s operating revenue was generated in Mexico and Canada. All Company tractors are domiciled in the United States. The Company does not separately track domestic and foreign long-lived assets. Providing such information would not be meaningful to the business. Substantially all of the Company’s long-lived assets are, and have been for the last three fiscal years, located within the United States.

 

The Company’s trucking segment is supported primarily by driver managers, load planners and customer service representatives. These teams monitor the location of equipment and direct its movement in a safe, efficient and practicable manner. Each driver manager supervises assigned drivers and is the primary contact with the drivers. Load planners assign all available units and loads in a manner designed to maximize profit and minimize costs. Customer service representatives work to fulfill shippers’ needs, solicit freight, and ensure on-time delivery by monitoring loads. The Company makes trucks available for dispatch, selecting profitable freight with a network and yield management focus, and efficiently matches that freight to available truck capacity, all of which the Company strives to achieve without sacrificing customer service, equipment utilization, driver retention or safety.

 

The SCS segment has a network of 13 branch offices located throughout the continental United States. The business model is built around the capabilities of Company team members to make available consistent service to customers. The specific locations of branch offices are selected for the availability of talent in those markets. SCS employed approximately 100 people as of December 31, 2015. Most of the SCS team interacts directly with customers, matching customers’ freight needs with available third party capacity in the marketplace. SCS also has staff that screen and select third party carriers that are used to transport the freight.

 

 

Revenue Equipment

 

We operate a modern Company tractor fleet to help attract drivers, promote safe operations, and reduce maintenance and repair costs. The following table shows the age of the Company owned and leased tractors and trailers as of December 31, 2015:

 

Model Year:		Tractors (1)				Trailers
2016			400				1,548
2015			298				500
2014			250				400
2013			243				298
2012			377				--
2011			--				--
2010			--				396
2009			--				437
2008			--				566
2007			--				1,213
2006			--				492
2005 and beyond			--				350
Total			1,568				6,200

 

(1)

Excludes 264 independent contractor tractors.

 

The Company’s equipment purchase and replacement decisions are based on a number of factors, including new equipment prices, the used equipment market, demand for freight services, prevailing interest rates, technological improvements, regulatory changes, cost per mile, fuel efficiency, equipment durability, equipment specifications and driver comfort. Therefore, depending on the circumstances, the Company may accelerate or delay the acquisition and disposition of its tractors or trailers from time to time. Generally, USA Truck’s primary business strategy of fully leveraging the significant capital investment in the current fleet of tractors and trailers requires the Company to strive to maximize the profitability of its existing assets before considering a material increase in the fleet size.

 

During 2015, the Company undertook an initiative to downsize the tractor fleet, resulting in a net decrease of approximately 400 tractors as the Company focused on its network, customer profitability and reduce its unsented tractors in its trucking segment. Goals of this initiative were to further improve fuel economy, reduce maintenance costs and improve the reliability of the Company’s equipment for the benefit of its drivers and customers.

 

To simplify driver and mechanic training, control the cost of spare parts and tire inventory and provide for a more efficient vehicle maintenance program, the Company purchases tractors and trailers manufactured to its specifications. The Company has a comprehensive preventive maintenance program designed to minimize equipment downtime and enhance sale or trade-in values.

 

The Company finances the purchase of revenue equipment through its cash flows from operations, revolving credit agreement, capital lease arrangements, fair market value lease agreements and proceeds from sales or trades of used equipment. Substantially all of the Company’s tractors and trailers are pledged to secure its obligations under financing arrangements.

 

During 2015, all Company and independent contractor tractors were equipped with PeopleNet in-cab technology, enabling two-way communications between the Company and its drivers, through both standardized and freeform messaging, including electronic logging. This enables USA Truck to dispatch drivers efficiently in response to customers’ requests, to provide real-time information to customers about the status of their shipments and to provide documentation supporting various accessorial charges. Accessorial costs are charges to customers for additional services such as loading, unloading or equipment delays. In addition, the Company utilizes satellite-based equipment tracking devices and cargo sensors on virtually all of its trailers. These tracking devices provide the Company with visibility on the locations and load status of its trailers.

 

Safety and Risk Management

 

The Company emphasizes safe work habits as a core value throughout the entire organization, and provides proactive training and education relating to safety concepts, processes and procedures. The Company conducts pre-employment, random, reasonable suspicion and post-accident alcohol and substance abuse testing in accordance with the Department of Transportation (“DOT”) regulations and the Company’s own policies.

 

 

Safety training for new drivers begins in orientation, when newly hired team members are taught safe driving and work techniques that emphasize the Company’s commitment to safety. Upon completion of orientation, new student drivers are required to undergo on-the-road training for four to six weeks with experienced commercial motor vehicle drivers who have been selected for their professionalism and commitment to safety and who are trained to communicate safe driving techniques to new drivers. New drivers who graduate from the program must also successfully complete post-training classroom and road testing before being assigned to their own tractor. Additionally, all Company drivers participate in on-going training that focuses on collision and injury prevention, among other safety concepts.

 

The primary risks for which the Company is insured are cargo loss and damage, liability, personal injury, property damage, workers’ compensation and employee medical expenses. USA Truck also self-insures for a portion of claims exposure in each of these areas. The Company’s self-insurance retention levels are $0.5 million for workers’ compensation claims per occurrence, $0.05 million for cargo loss and damage claims per occurrence and $1.0 million for bodily injury and property damage claims per occurrence. For medical benefits, the Company self-insures up to $0.25 million per plan participant per year with an aggregate claim exposure limit determined by the Company’s year-to-date claims experience and its number of covered team members. The Company maintains insurance above the amounts for which it self-insures, to certain limits, with licensed insurance carriers. The Company has excess general, auto and employer’s liability coverage in amounts substantially exceeding minimum legal requirements. The Company is completely self-insured for physical damage to its own tractors and trailers, except that the Company carries catastrophic physical damage coverage to protect against natural disasters.

 

Although the Company believes the aggregate insurance limits should be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, it is possible that one or more claims could exceed the Company’s aggregate coverage limits. An unexpected loss or changing conditions in the insurance market could adversely affect premium levels. As a result, the Company’s insurance and claims expense could increase, or USA Truck could raise its self-insured retention or decrease the Company’s aggregate coverage limits when its policies are renewed or replaced. If these costs increase, if reserves are increased, if claims in excess of coverage limits are experienced, or if a claim is experienced where coverage is not provided, the Company’s results of operations and financial condition in any one quarter or annual period could be materially and adversely affected.

 

Team Members

 

As of December 31, 2015, the Company had approximately 2,300 team members, of which about 73% were Company drivers. No team members are subject to union contracts or part of a collective bargaining unit. The Company believes team member relations to be good.

 

Recruitment, training, and retention of a professional driver workforce, the Company’s most valuable asset, are essential to the Company’s continued growth and meeting the service requirements of its customers. USA Truck hires qualified professional drivers who hold a valid commercial driver’s license, satisfy applicable federal and state safety performance and measurement requirements, and meet USA Truck’s hiring parameters. These guidelines relate primarily to safety history, road test evaluations, and various other evaluations, which include physical examinations and mandatory drug and alcohol testing. In order to attract and retain safe drivers who are committed to customer service and safety, the Company focuses its operations for drivers around a collaborative and supportive team environment. The Company provides comfortable, late model equipment, direct communication with senior management, competitive wages and benefits, and other incentives designed to encourage driver safety, retention, and long-term employment. The Company values its relationship with its drivers and structures its driver retention model with a focus on a long-term career with USA Truck. Drivers are compensated on a per mile basis, based on the length of haul and a predetermined number of miles. Drivers are also compensated for additional services provided to customers. Drivers and other employees are encouraged to participate in the Company’s 401(k) program, and Company-sponsored health, life, and dental plans. The Company believes these factors help in attracting, recruiting, and retaining professional drivers in a competitive driver market.

 

Independent Contractors

 

In addition to Company drivers, USA Truck enters into contracts with independent contractors, who provide a tractor and a driver and are responsible for all operating expenses in exchange for a fixed payment per mile. The Company intends to continue to grow the use of independent contractors. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had contracts with 264 independent contractors, representing an increase of approximately 28% compared to the prior year.

 

 

Competition

 

The trucking industry includes both private fleets and for-hire carriers. Private fleets consist of trucks owned and operated by shippers that move their own goods. For-hire carriers include both truckload and less-than-truckload operations. The for-hire segment is highly competitive and includes thousands of carriers, none of which dominates the market. This segment is characterized by many small carriers having revenues of less than $1 million per year and as few as one truck and relatively few carriers with revenues exceeding $100 million per year.

 

USA Truck competes primarily with other truckload carriers, private fleets and, to a lesser extent, railroads and less-than-truckload carriers. A number of truckload carriers have greater financial resources, own more revenue equipment and carry a larger volume of freight than USA Truck. The principal competitive factors in the truckload segment of the industry are service and price, with rate discounting becoming particularly important during economic downturns. USA Truck’s focus is to differentiate itself primarily on the basis of service rather than rates. Although an increase in the size of the market would benefit all truckload carriers, management believes that successful carriers are likely to grow by offering additional services to its customers based on customer needs and acquiring a greater market share.

 

Environmental Regulation

 

EPA regulations limiting exhaust emissions became more restrictive in 2010. In 2010, an executive memorandum was signed directing the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) and the EPA to develop new, stricter fuel efficiency standards for heavy trucks. In 2011, the NHTSA and the EPA adopted final rules that established the first-ever fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. These standards apply to model years 2014 to 2018, which are required to achieve an approximate 20 percent reduction in fuel consumption by 2018, and equates to approximately four gallons of fuel for every 100 miles traveled. In addition, in February 2014, President Obama announced that his administration will begin developing the next phase of tighter fuel efficiency standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and directed the EPA and NHTSA to develop new fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas standards by March 31, 2016. In response, in June 2015, the EPA and NHTSA jointly proposed new stricter standards that would apply to trailers beginning with model year 2018 and tractors beginning with model year 2021. After an extended comment period ending in October 2015, a final rule has not yet been published. If this rule or a similar rule was enacted, the Company believes these requirements could result in increased new tractor prices and additional parts and maintenance costs incurred to retrofit its tractors with technology to achieve compliance with such standards, which could adversely affect its operating results and profitability, particularly if such costs are not offset by potential fuel savings. The Company cannot predict, however, the extent to which its operations and productivity will be impacted.

 

The California Air Resource Board (“CARB”) also has adopted emission control regulations which will be applicable to all heavy-duty tractors that pull 53-foot or longer box-type trailers within the state of California. The tractors and trailers subject to these regulations must be either EPA Smart Way certified or equipped with low-rolling, resistance tires and retrofitted with Smart Way-approved aerodynamic technologies. Enforcement of these CARB regulations for model year 2011 equipment began in 2010 and will be phased in over several years for older equipment. The Company currently purchases Smart Way certified equipment in its new tractor and trailer acquisitions. Federal and state lawmakers also have proposed potential limits on carbon emissions under a variety of other climate-change proposals. Compliance with such regulations may increase the cost of new tractors and trailers, may require USA Truck to retrofit its equipment, and could impair equipment productivity and increase the Company’s operating expenses. These adverse effects, combined with the uncertainty as to the reliability of the newly designed diesel engines and the residual value of these vehicles, could materially increase USA Truck’s operating expenses or otherwise adversely affect its business or operations.

 

Other Regulation

 

The Company’s operations are regulated and licensed by various United States federal and state, Canadian provincial, and Mexican federal agencies. Interstate motor carrier operations are subject to safety requirements prescribed by the DOT. Matters such as weight and equipment dimensions are also subject to United States federal and state regulation and Canadian provincial regulations. The Company operates in the United States pursuant to operating authority granted by the DOT, in various Canadian provinces pursuant to operating authority granted by the Ministries of Transportation and Communications in such provinces, and within Mexico pursuant to operating authority granted by Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transportes. To the extent that the Company conducts operations outside the United States, it is subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which generally prohibits United States companies and their intermediaries from bribing foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining favorable treatment.

 

 

The DOT, through the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (the “FMCSA”), imposes safety and fitness regulations on the Company and its drivers, including rules that restrict driver hours-of-service. In December 2011, the FMCSA published its 2011 Hours-of-Service Final Rule (the “2011 Rule”). The 2011 Rule requires drivers to take 30-minute breaks after eight hours of consecutive driving and reduces the total number of hours a driver is permitted to work during each week from 82 hours to 70 hours. The 2011 Rule provides that the 34-hour restart may only be used once per week and must include two rest periods between one a.m. and five a.m. (together, the “2011 Restart Restrictions”). These rule changes became effective in July 2013.

 

In December 2014, the 2015 Omnibus Appropriations bill was signed into law. Among other things, the legislation provided temporary relief from the 2011 Restart Restrictions, and essentially reverted back to the more straight forward 34-hour restart rule that was in effect before the 2011 Rule became effective. In 2016, Congress is expected to consider a study conducted by the FMCSA related to the 2011 Restart Restrictions. Congressional action based on the findings of the study could result in a reinstatement or continued suspension of the 2011 Restart Restrictions. If the 2011 Restart Restrictions are reinstated, the Company may experience a decrease in production similar to that experienced during 2013 and 2014 when the 2011 Restart Restrictions were in effect.

 

There are two methods of evaluating the safety and fitness of carriers. The first method is the application of a safety rating that is based on an onsite investigation and affects a carrier’s ability to operate in interstate commerce. The Company currently has a satisfactory DOT safety rating under this method, which is the highest available rating under the current safety rating scale. If USA Truck were to receive a conditional or unsatisfactory DOT safety rating, it could adversely affect the Company’s business, as some of its existing customer contracts require a satisfactory DOT safety rating. In January 2016, the FMCSA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking outlining a revised safety rating measurement system, which would replace the current methodology. Under the proposed rules, the current three safety ratings of “satisfactory,” “conditional,” and “unsatisfactory” would be replaced with a single safety rating of “unfit.” Moreover, data from roadside inspections and the results from all investigations would be used to determine a carrier’s fitness on an ongoing basis. This would replace the current methodology of determining a carrier’s fitness based solely on infrequent comprehensive onsite reviews. The proposed rules will undergo a 90-day public comment period, after which, a final rule could either be published or become subject to further legislative reviews and delays. Therefore, it is uncertain if or when these proposed rules could take effect.

 

In addition to the safety rating system, the FMCSA has adopted the Compliance Safety Accountability program (“CSA”) as an additional safety enforcement and compliance model that evaluates and ranks fleets on certain safety-related standards. The CSA program analyzes data from roadside inspections, moving violations, crash reports from the last two years, and investigation results. The data is organized into seven categories. Carriers are grouped by category with other carriers that have a similar number of safety events (e.g., crashes, inspections, or violations) and carriers are ranked and assigned a rating percentile to prioritize them for interventions if they are above a certain threshold. Currently, these scores do not have a direct impact on a carrier’s safety rating. However, the occurrence of unfavorable scores in one or more categories may (i) affect driver recruiting and retention by causing high-quality drivers to seek employment with other carriers, (ii) cause USA Truck’s customers to direct their business away from the Company and to carriers with higher fleet safety rankings, (iii) subject the Company to an increase in compliance reviews and roadside inspections, or (iv) cause the Company to incur greater than expected expenses in its attempts to improve unfavorable scores, any of which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and profitability.

 

Under CSA, these scores were initially made available to the public in five of the seven categories. However, pursuant to the FAST Act, which was signed into law in December 2015, the FMCSA is required to remove from public view the previously available CSA scores while it reviews the reliability of the scoring system. During this period of review by the FMCSA, the Company will continue to have access to its own scores and will still be subject to intervention by the FMCSA when such scores are above the intervention thresholds. Currently, the Company is exceeding the established intervention thresholds in one of the seven categories of CSA, in comparison to its peer group; however, the Company continues to maintain a satisfactory rating with the DOT. The Company will continue to promote improvement of scores in all seven categories with ongoing reviews of all safety-related policies, programs and procedures for their effectiveness.

 

In 2011, the FMCSA issued new rules that would require nearly all carriers, including USA Truck, to install and use electronic on-board recording devices (“EOBRs,” now referred to as electronic logging devices, or “ELDs”) in their tractors to electronically monitor truck miles and enforce hours-of-service. These rules, however, were vacated by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in August 2011. The final rule related to mandatory use of ELDs was published in December 2015, and requires the use of ELDs by nearly all carriers by December 10, 2017. The Company has proactively installed ELDs on 100% of its tractor fleet.

 

 

In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, federal, state and municipal authorities implemented and continue to implement various security measures, including checkpoints and travel restrictions on large trucks. The Transportation Security Administration (the “TSA”) has adopted regulations that require determination by the TSA that each driver who applies for or renews his license for carrying hazardous materials is not a security threat. This could reduce the pool of qualified drivers, which could require USA Truck to increase driver compensation, limit fleet growth, or allow trucks to sit idle. These regulations also could complicate the successful pairing of available equipment with hazardous material shipments, thereby increasing the Company’s response time and deadhead miles on customer shipments. Consequently, it is possible that the Company may fail to meet the needs of its customers or may incur increased expenses.

 

In November 2015, the FMCSA published its final rule related to driver coercion, which took effect on January 29, 2016. Under this rule, carriers, shippers, receivers, or transportation intermediaries that are found to have coerced drivers to violate certain FMCSA regulations (including hours-of-service rules) may be fined up to $16,000 for each offense. The FMCSA and certain legislators have proposed other rules that may be published as early as 2016, including (i) the use of speed limiting devices on heavy duty trucks to restrict maximum speeds, (ii) the creation of a national clearinghouse so employers and prospective employers could query to determine if current or prospective drivers have had any drug/alcohol positives or refusals, and (iii) an increase in the allowable length of twin trailers from 28 feet to 33 feet. If these rules take effect, they could result in a decrease in fleet production, driver availability, and freight tonnage available to full truckload carriers, all of which could adversely affect USA Truck’s business or operations.

 

For further discussion regarding such laws and regulations, refer to the “Risk Factors” section under Part 1, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.

 

Seasonality

 

In the trucking industry, revenue has historically followed a seasonal pattern for various commodities and customer businesses. Peak freight demand has historically occurred in the months of September, October and November. After the December holiday season and during the remaining winter months, freight volumes are typically lower as many customers reduce shipment levels. Operating expenses have historically been higher in the winter months due primarily to decreased fuel efficiency, increased cold weather-related maintenance costs of revenue equipment and increased insurance and claims costs attributed to adverse winter weather conditions. The Company has historically attempted and expects to continue to attempt to minimize the impact of seasonality through its diverse customer solutions offerings by seeking additional freight from certain customers during traditionally slower shipping periods and focusing on transporting consumer nondurable products. Revenue can and may also be impacted by weather, holidays and the number of business days that occur during a given period, as revenue is directly related to the available working days of shippers.

 

Available Information

 

USA Truck was incorporated in Delaware in September 1986 as a wholly owned subsidiary of ABF Freight System, Inc., and was purchased by management in December 1988. The initial public offering of the Company’s common stock was completed in March 1992.

 

The Company’s principal offices are located at 3200 Industrial Park Road, Van Buren, Arkansas 72956, and its telephone number is (479) 471-2500.

 

The Company maintains a website where additional information regarding USA Truck’s business and operations may be found. The website address is www.usa-truck.com. The website provides certain investor information available free of charge, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, stock ownership reports filed under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and any amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. The website also includes Interactive Data Files required to be posted pursuant to Rule 405 of SEC Regulation S-T. Information provided on the Company website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K, and you should not consider information on our website to be part of this Form 10-K.

 

Additionally, you may read all of the materials that we file with the SEC by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. If you would like information about the operation of the Public Reference Room, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also visit the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. This site contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding USA Truck and other companies that file electronically with the SEC.

 

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

The following risks and uncertainties may cause our actual results, business, financial condition and cash flows to differ from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements made herein because such statements speak only to the date they were made. We undertake no obligation or duty to revise or update any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect subsequent events or circumstances or the occurrence of unanticipated events. Also refer to the Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements in Part I of this Form 10-K.

 

Our business is subject to general economic, credit, and business factors affecting the trucking industry that are largely out of our control, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

 

Our industry is highly cyclical, and our business is dependent on a number of factors that may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, many of which are beyond our control. Some of the most significant of these factors are economic changes that affect supply and demand in transportation markets, including recessionary economic cycles, such as the period from 2007 to 2009, and the uncertainty surrounding such supply and demand in 2016; changes in customers’ inventory levels and in the availability of funding for their working capital; excess tractor capacity in comparison with shipping demand; and downturns in customers’ business cycles.

 

We are also affected by recessionary economic cycles, such as the period from 2007 to 2009. Such economic conditions can decrease freight demand and increase the supply of available tractors and trailers, thereby exerting downward pressure on rates and equipment utilization and may adversely affect our customers and their ability to pay for our services. The risks associated with these factors are heightened when the United States economy is weakened. Some of the principal risks during such times, that we have experienced during prior recessionary periods, are as follows: reduction in overall freight levels, which may impair asset utilization; customers facing credit issues and cash flow problems that may lead to payment delays, increased credit risk, bankruptcies, and other financial hardships that could result in even lower freight demand and may require us to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts; changing freight patterns as supply chains are redesigned, resulting in an imbalance between capacity and freight demand; customers bidding our freight or selecting competitors that offer lower rates from among existing choices in an attempt to lower costs, in which case, we may be forced to lower rates or lose freight; accepting more freight from brokers, where freight rates are typically lower, or incurrence of more non-revenue miles to obtain loads; and lack of access to current sources of credit or lack of lender access to capital, leading to an inability to secure financing on satisfactory terms, or at all.

 

We are subject to increases in costs and other events that are outside our control that could materially affect our results of operations. Such cost increases include, but are not limited to, fuel and energy prices, taxes and interest rates, tolls, license and registration fees, insurance premiums, revenue equipment and related maintenance costs, and healthcare and other benefits for our employees. We could be affected by strikes or other work stoppages at our service centers or at customer, port, border, or other shipping locations. Changing impacts of regulatory measures could impair our operating efficiency and productivity, decrease our operating revenue and profitability, and result in higher operating costs. In addition, declines in the resale value of revenue equipment can also affect our operating income and cash flows. From time to time, various federal, state, or local taxes also increase, including taxes on fuels. We cannot predict whether, or in what form, any such increase applicable to us will be enacted, but such an increase could adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.

 

In addition, we cannot predict future economic conditions, fuel price fluctuations, or how consumer confidence could be affected by actual or threatened armed conflicts or terrorist attacks, government efforts to combat terrorism, military action against a foreign state or group located in a foreign state, or heightened security requirements. Enhanced security measures could impair our operating efficiency and productivity and result in higher operating costs.

 

We operate in a highly competitive and fragmented industry, and our business may suffer if we are unable to adequately address downward pricing pressures and other factors that may adversely affect our ability to compete with other carriers.

 

Numerous competitive factors could impair our ability to maintain and improve profitability. These factors include:

 

●	We compete with many other truckload carriers of varying sizes and, to a lesser extent, with less-than-truckload carriers and railroads, some of which have more equipment or greater capital resources, or other competitive advantages.

●	Many of our competitors periodically reduce their freight rates to gain business, especially during times of reduced economic growth, which may limit our ability to maintain or increase freight rates, maintain our margins, or maintain growth in our business.

 

 

●	Some of our customers also operate their own private trucking fleets, and they may decide to transport more of their own freight.

●	Many customers reduce the number of carriers they use by selecting so-called “core carriers” as approved service providers, and in some instances we may not be selected.

●	Many customers periodically accept bids from multiple carriers for their shipping needs, and this process may depress freight rates or result in the loss of some of our business to competitors.

●	The trend toward consolidation in the trucking industry may create large carriers with greater financial resources and other competitive advantages relating to their size, and we may have difficulty competing with these larger carriers.

●	Advances in technology require increased investments to remain competitive, and our customers may not be willing to accept higher freight rates to cover the cost of these investments.

●	Competition from non-asset-based and other logistics and freight brokerage companies may adversely affect our customer relationships and freight rates.

●	Economies of scale that may be passed on to smaller carriers by procurement aggregation providers may improve their ability to compete with us.

  

Our revolving credit agreement and other financing arrangements contain certain covenants, restrictions, and requirements, and we may be unable to comply with the covenants, restrictions, and requirements. A default could result in the acceleration of all or part of any outstanding indebtedness, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and the market price of our common stock.

 

In February 2015, we entered into a new senior secured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders and Bank of America, N.A., as agent. Contemporaneously with the funding of the Credit Facility, we paid off the obligations under our prior credit facility and terminated such facility. We also have other financing arrangements.

 

The Credit Facility contains a single springing financial covenant, which requires a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0 to 1.0. The financial covenant springs only in the event excess availability under the Credit Facility drops below 10% of the lenders’ total commitments under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility contains certain restrictions and covenants related to, among other things, dividends, liens, acquisitions and dispositions, affiliate transactions, and other indebtedness. The Credit Facility is secured by a pledge of substantially all of our assets, with the notable exclusion of any real estate or revenue equipment financed outside the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility includes usual and customary events of default for a facility of this nature and provides that, upon the occurrence and continuation of an event of default, payment of all amounts payable under the Credit Facility may be accelerated, and the lenders’ commitments may be terminated.

 

If we fail to comply with any of our financing arrangement covenants, restrictions, and requirements, we will be in default under the relevant agreement, which could cause cross-defaults under our other financing arrangements. In the event of any such default, if we failed to obtain replacement financing or amendments to, or waivers under, the applicable financing arrangements, existing lenders could cease to make further advances, could declare existing debt to be immediately due and payable, could fail to renew letters of credit, could impose significant restrictions and requirements on our operations, could institute foreclosure proceedings against collateralized assets, or could impose significant fees and transaction costs. If acceleration occurs, it may be difficult or expensive to refinance the accelerated debt or the issuance of additional equity securities could dilute stock ownership. Even if new financing can be procured, more stringent borrowing terms could mean that credit is not available to us on acceptable terms. A default under these financing arrangements could cause a materially adverse effect on the liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

We have significant ongoing capital requirements that could adversely affect our profitability if we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations, or obtain financing on favorable terms.

 

The truckload industry is capital intensive, and our policy of operating newer equipment requires us to expend significant amounts annually. We expect to pay for projected capital expenditures with cash flows from operations, borrowings under the Credit Facility, proceeds from the sale of used revenue equipment, and, to a lesser extent, capital and operating leases. We base our equipment purchase and replacement decisions on a number of factors, including new equipment prices, the used equipment market, demand for freight services, prevailing interest rates, technological improvements, regulatory changes, cost per mile, fuel efficiency, equipment durability, equipment specifications, and driver comfort.

 

In the future, if we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain borrowing on favorable terms, we may be forced to limit our fleet size, enter into less favorable financing arrangements, or operate revenue equipment for longer periods, any of which could materially and adversely affect profitability.

 

We self-insure for a significant portion of our claims exposure, which could significantly increase the volatility of, and decrease the amount of, our earnings.

 

Our future insurance and claims expense could reduce our earnings and make our earnings more volatile. We self-insure for a significant portion of our claims exposure and related expenses. We accrue amounts for liabilities based on our assessment of claims that arise and our insurance coverage for the periods in which the claims arise, and we evaluate and revise these accruals from time to time based on additional information. Due to our significant self-insured amounts, we have significant exposure to fluctuations in the number and severity of claims and the risk of being required to accrue or pay additional amounts if estimates are revised or claims ultimately prove to be more severe than originally assessed. Historically, we have had to adjust our reserves, and future significant adjustments may occur. Further, our self-insured retention levels could change and result in more volatility than in recent years.

 

We maintain insurance above the amounts for which we self-insure with licensed insurance carriers. Although we believe our aggregate insurance limits will be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, it is possible that one or more claims could exceed our aggregate coverage limits. If any claim was to exceed our coverage, we would bear the excess, in addition to other self-insured amounts. Our insurance and claims expense could increase, or we could find it necessary to raise our self-insured retention or decrease our aggregate coverage limits when our policies are renewed or replaced. Our operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected if these expenses increase, if we experience a claim in excess of our coverage limits, if we experience a claim for which we do not have coverage, if we experience an increase in the number of claims, or if we have to increase our reserves.

 

Healthcare legislation and inflationary cost increases also could negatively impact financial results by increasing annual employee healthcare costs going forward. We cannot presently determine the extent of the impact healthcare costs will have on our financial performance. In addition, rising healthcare costs could force us to make changes to existing benefits program, which could negatively impact our ability to attract and retain employees.

 

 

Fluctuations in the price or availability of fuel, hedging activities, the volume and terms of diesel fuel purchase commitments, surcharge collection, and surcharge policies approved by customers may increase our costs of operation, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability.

 

Fuel is one of our largest operating expenses. Diesel fuel prices fluctuate greatly due to economic, political, weather, and other factors beyond our control, each of which may lead to an increase in the price of fuel. Fuel pricing is also affected by regional differences. Additionally, fuel pricing also can be affected by the rising demand in developing countries and could be adversely impacted by the use of crude oil and oil reserves for other purposes and diminished drilling activity. Such events may lead not only to increases in fuel prices, but also to fuel shortages and disruptions in the fuel supply chain. Our operations are dependent upon diesel fuel, and accordingly, significant diesel fuel cost increases, shortages, or supply disruptions could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

 

From time to time, we may use hedging contracts and volume purchase arrangements to attempt to limit the effect of price fluctuations. If we do enter into hedging contracts, we may be forced to make cash payments under the hedging arrangements. In addition, in times of falling diesel fuel prices, including recently, our costs will not be reduced to the same extent they would have reduced had we not entered into the hedging contracts. Accordingly, in times of falling diesel fuel prices, our profitability may not increase to the extent it would have increased without the hedging contract.

 

We use a fuel surcharge program to recapture a portion of the increases in fuel prices over a base rate negotiated with our customers. The fuel surcharge program does not protect us from the full effect of increases in fuel prices. The terms of each customer’s fuel surcharge program vary, and certain customers have sought to modify the terms of their fuel surcharge programs to minimize recoverability for fuel price increases. A failure to improve our fuel price protection through these measures, increases in fuel prices, a shortage or rationing of diesel fuel, or significant payments under hedging arrangements could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Fluctuations in the prices of used revenue equipment may adversely affect our earnings and cash flows.

 

A decreased demand for used revenue equipment could adversely affect us and our operating results. We rely on the sale and trade-in of used revenue equipment to partially offset the cost of new revenue equipment. The market demand for used equipment is difficult to forecast and, although our equipment disposal schedule may fluctuate, we currently expect the market demand and gains on disposal in 2016 to be significantly less than the Company experienced in 2015 as we downsized the fleet and were able to take advantage of a favorable used tractor and trailer markets. When the used equipment market is weak, it may increase our net capital expenditures for new revenue equipment, decrease our gains on sale of revenue equipment (or create a loss on sale of revenue equipment), or increase our maintenance costs if we decide to extend the use of revenue equipment in a depressed market, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

 

Increased prices, reduced productivity and scarcity of financing for new revenue equipment may adversely affect our earnings and cash flows.

 

We are subject to risk with respect to higher prices for new tractors. Prices have increased and may continue to increase, due in part to government regulations applicable to newly manufactured tractors and diesel engines and the pricing discretion of equipment manufacturers. In addition, we have recently equipped our tractors with safety, aerodynamics, and other options that increase the price of new tractors. More restrictive Environmental Protection Agency emissions standards have required vendors to introduce new engines. Compliance with such regulations has increased the cost of our new tractors and could impair equipment productivity, lower fuel mileage, and increase operating expenses. These adverse effects, combined with the uncertainty as to the reliability of the vehicles equipped with the newly designed diesel engines and the residual values realized from the disposition of these vehicles, could increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business or operations as the regulations become effective.

 

We have a combination of agreements and non-binding statements of indicative trade values covering the terms of trade-in commitments from our primary equipment vendors for disposal of a portion of our revenue equipment. From time to time, prices we expect to receive under these arrangements may be higher than the prices we would receive in the open market. We may suffer a financial loss upon disposition of our equipment if these vendors refuse or are unable to meet their financial obligations under these agreements, if we do not enter into definitive agreements consistent with the indicative trade values, if we fail to or are unable to enter into similar arrangements in the future, or if we do not purchase the number of replacement units from the vendors required for such trade-ins.

 

 

Our indebtedness and capital and operating lease obligations could adversely affect our ability to respond to changes in our industry or business.

 

As a result of our level of debt, capital leases, operating leases, and encumbered assets, we believe:

 

●	our vulnerability to adverse economic conditions and competitive pressures is heightened;

●	we will continue to be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations to lease payments and repayment of debt, limiting the availability of cash for other purposes;

●	our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry will be limited;

●	our profitability is sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates because some of our debt obligations are subject to variable interest rates, and future borrowings and lease financing arrangements will be affected by any such fluctuations;

●	our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, or other purposes may be limited; and

●	we may be required to issue additional equity securities to raise funds, which would dilute the ownership position of our stockholders.

 

Our financing obligations could negatively impact our future operations, ability to satisfy our capital needs, or ability to engage in other business activities. We also cannot assure you that additional financing will be available to us when required or, if available, will be on terms satisfactory to us.

 

We have a recent history of net losses and may be unsuccessful in maintaining or increasing profitability.

 

We have generated a profit in two of the last five years. Maintaining and improving profitability depends upon numerous factors, including the ability to increase average revenue per tractor, increase velocity, improve driver retention, and control operating expenses. Despite recent results, we may not be able to maintain or increase profitability in the future. If we are unable to maintain our profitability, then our liquidity, financial position, and results of operations may be adversely affected.

 

We may not be successful in implementing new management, operating procedures, and cost savings initiatives as part of our long-term turnaround plan.

 

As part of the long-term turnaround plan, we have implemented changes to our management team and structure, as well as operating procedures. These changes may not be successful or may not achieve the desired results. Additional training or different personnel may be required, which may result in additional expense, delays in obtaining results, or disruptions to operations. Some of these implemented changes include customer service and driver management changes and cost savings initiatives. These changes and initiatives may not improve our results of operations, including asset productivity, tractor utilization, driver retention and base revenue per mile. In addition, we may not be successful in achieving the expected savings in our cost structure, including the areas of insurance and claims, equipment maintenance, equipment operating costs, and fuel economy. In such event, our revenue, financial results, and ability to operate profitably could be negatively impacted. Further, our operating results may be negatively affected by a failure to further penetrate our existing customer base, cross-sell our services, pursue new customer opportunities, and manage the operations and expenses of our new or growing services. There is no assurance we will be successful in achieving our long-term turnaround plan and initiatives. If we are unsuccessful in implementing our long-term turnaround plan and initiatives, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected.

 

Management and key employee turnover or failure to attract and retain qualified management and other key personnel, could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

We depend on the leadership and expertise of our executive management team and other key personnel to design and execute our strategic and operating plans, including our current efforts to grow and improve the profitability of our trucking and SCS segments. Our management team has experienced significant changes in recent years and may continue to experience change. Turnover, planned or otherwise, in key leadership positions may adversely impact our ability to manage our business efficiently and effectively, and such turnover can be disruptive and distracting to management, may lead to additional departures of existing personnel, and could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future profitability. We must recruit, develop and retain a core group of managers to realize our goal of expanding our operations, improving our earnings consistency, and positioning ourselves for long-term operating revenue growth.

 

 

Increases in driver compensation or difficulty in attracting and retaining qualified drivers could adversely affect our profitability.

 

Like many truckload carriers, from time to time we experience substantial difficulty in attracting and retaining sufficient numbers of qualified professional drivers, including independent contractors. The trucking industry periodically experiences a shortage of qualified drivers, particularly during periods of economic expansion, in which alternative employment opportunities are more plentiful and freight demand increases, or during periods of economic downturns, in which unemployment benefits might be extended and financing is limited for independent contractors who seek to purchase equipment or for students who seek financial aid for driving school. Regulatory requirements, including CSA and hours-of-service, and an improved economy could further reduce the number of eligible drivers or force us to increase driver compensation to attract and retain drivers. Due to the shortage of qualified professional drivers and intense competition for drivers from other trucking companies, we expect to continue to face difficulty increasing the number of our drivers, including independent contractors. The compensation we offer our drivers and independent contractors is subject to market conditions, and, as market conditions change, we may find it necessary to increase driver and independent contractor compensation in future periods. For example, we implemented a significant increase in driver pay during the second quarter of 2015.

 

In addition, we and our industry suffer from a high driver turnover rate. The high driver turnover rate requires us to continually recruit a substantial number of drivers to operate existing revenue equipment. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain a sufficient number of drivers, we could be required to, among other things, adjust our compensation packages, increase the number of tractors without drivers, or operate with fewer tractors and face difficulty meeting shipper demands, all of which could adversely affect our growth and profitability.

 

If our independent contractors are deemed by regulators or judicial process to be employees, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

Tax and other regulatory authorities have asserted that independent contractor drivers in the trucking industry are employees rather than independent contractors. Federal legislation has been introduced in the past that would make it easier for tax and other authorities to reclassify independent contractors as employees, including legislation to increase the recordkeeping requirements for those that engage independent contractor drivers and to increase the penalties for companies who misclassify their employees and are found to have violated employees’ overtime and/or wage requirements. Additionally, federal legislators have sought to abolish the current safe harbor allowing taxpayers meeting certain criteria to treat individuals as independent contractors if they are following a long-standing, recognized practice, extend the Fair Labor Standards Act to independent contractors, and impose notice requirements based on employment or independent contractor status and fines for failure to comply. Some states have put initiatives in place to increase their revenue from items such as unemployment, workers’ compensation, and income taxes, and a reclassification of independent contractors as employees would help states with this initiative. Taxing and other regulatory authorities and courts apply a variety of standards in their determination of independent contractor status. If our independent contractors are determined to be employees, we would incur additional exposure under federal and state tax, workers’ compensation, unemployment benefits, labor, employment, and tort laws, including for prior periods, as well as potential liability for employee benefits and tax withholdings.

 

We depend on third parties, particularly in our brokerage and rail intermodal businesses, and service instability from these providers could increase our operating costs and reduce our ability to offer brokerage or rail intermodal services, which could adversely affect our revenue, results of operations, and customer relationships.

 

Our brokerage business is dependent upon the services of third-party capacity providers, including other truckload carriers. For this business, we do not own or control the transportation assets that deliver our customers’ freight, and do not employ the people directly involved in delivering the freight. This reliance could also cause delays in reporting certain events, including recognizing revenue and claims. These third-party providers seek other freight opportunities and may require increased compensation in times of improved freight demand or tight trucking capacity. Our inability to secure the services of these third parties could significantly limit our ability to serve our customers on competitive terms. Additionally, if we are unable to secure sufficient equipment or other transportation services to meet our commitments to our customers or provide services on competitive terms, our operating results could be materially and adversely affected. Our ability to secure sufficient equipment or other transportation services is affected by many risks beyond our control, including equipment shortages in the transportation industry, particularly among contracted truckload carriers, interruptions in service due to labor disputes, changes in regulations impacting transportation, and changes in transportation rates.

 

 

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from our major customers, the loss of one or more of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We generate a significant portion of our operating revenue from our major customers.  Generally, we do not have long-term contracts with our major customers.  Accordingly, in response to economic conditions, supply and demand in the industry, our performance, our customers’ internal initiatives, or other factors, our customers may reduce or eliminate their use of our services, or threaten to do so to gain pricing or other concessions from us. 

 

Economic conditions and capital markets may adversely affect our customers and their ability to remain solvent. Our customers' financial difficulties can negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition, especially if these customers were to delay or default on payments to us. For some of our customers, we have entered into multi-year contracts, and the rates we charge may not remain advantageous. A reduction in or termination of our services by one or more of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

 

We operate in a highly regulated industry, and changes in existing regulations or violations of existing or future regulations could have a material adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

 

We operate in the United States pursuant to operating authority granted by the U.S. Department of Transportation (the “DOT”), in various Canadian provinces pursuant to operating authority granted by the Ministries of Transportation and Communications, and our Mexican business activities are subject to operating authority granted by Secretaria de Communicaciones y Transportes. Company drivers and independent contractors also must comply with the safety and fitness regulations of the DOT, including those relating to drug and alcohol testing, driver safety performance, and hours-of-service. Matters such as weight, equipment dimensions, and exhaust emissions are also subject to government regulations. We also may become subject to new or more restrictive regulations relating to exhaust emissions, drivers’ hours-of-service, ergonomics, on-board reporting of operations, collective bargaining, security at ports, speed limiters, and other matters affecting safety or operating methods. Future laws and regulations may be more stringent, require changes in our operating practices, influence the demand for transportation services, or require us to incur significant additional costs. Higher costs we incur, or higher costs incurred by suppliers who pass the costs on to us, could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

The CSA program adopted by the FMCSA could adversely affect our profitability and operations, our ability to maintain or grow our fleet, and our customer relationships.

 

Under CSA, fleets are evaluated and ranked against their peers based on certain safety-related standards. As a result, certain current and potential drivers may not be hired to drive for us and our fleet could be ranked poorly as compared to our peer firms. We recruit and retain first-time drivers to be part of our fleet, and these drivers may have a higher likelihood of creating adverse safety events under CSA. The occurrence of future deficiencies could affect driver recruitment by causing high-quality drivers to seek employment with other carriers or could cause our customers to direct their business away from us and to carriers with higher fleet safety rankings, either of which would adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, competition for drivers with favorable safety ratings may increase and thus could necessitate increases in driver-related compensation costs. Further, we may incur greater than expected expenses in our attempts to improve our scores or as a result of those scores.

 

We have exceeded the established intervention thresholds under certain CSA categories. Based on these unfavorable ratings, we may be prioritized for an intervention action or roadside inspection, or our driver recruiting and retention may be affected by causing high-quality drivers to seek employment with other carriers, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, customers may be less likely to assign loads to us. We have procedures in place in an attempt to address areas where we have exceeded the thresholds. However, we cannot assure you these measures will be effective.

 

Receipt of an unfavorable DOT safety rating could have a material adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

 

We currently have a satisfactory DOT rating, which is the highest available rating under the current safety rating scale. If we were to receive a conditional or unsatisfactory DOT safety rating, it could adversely affect our business as customer contracts may require a satisfactory DOT safety rating, and a conditional or unsatisfactory rating could negatively impact or restrict our operations.

 

The FMCSA also has proposed regulations that would modify the existing rating system and the safety labels assigned to motor carriers evaluated by the DOT. Under the proposed regulations, the methodology for determining a carrier’s DOT safety rating would be expanded to include the on-road safety performance of the carrier’s drivers and equipment, as well as results obtained from investigations. Exceeding certain thresholds based on such performance or results would cause a carrier to receive an unfit safety rating. If these proposed regulations are enacted and we were to receive an unfit safety rating, our business would be adversely affected in the same manner as if we received a conditional or unsatisfactory safety rating under the current regulations.

 

 

Our operations are subject to various environmental laws and regulations, the violation of which could result in substantial fines or penalties.

 

We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations dealing with the transportation and handling of hazardous materials, fuel storage tanks, air emissions from our vehicles and facilities, engine idling, and discharge and retention of storm water. We operate in industrial areas, where truck terminals and other industrial activities are located, and where groundwater or other forms of environmental contamination may have occurred. Our operations involve the risks of fuel spillage or seepage, environmental damage, and hazardous waste disposal, among others. We also maintain above-ground bulk fuel storage tanks and fueling islands at several of our facilities and one leased facility has below-ground bulk fuel storage tanks. A small percentage of our freight consists of low-grade hazardous substances, which subjects us to a wide array of regulations. Additionally, increasing efforts to control emissions of greenhouse gases may have an adverse effect on us. Federal and state lawmakers are considering a variety of climate-change proposals and new greenhouse gas regulations that could increase the cost of new tractors, impair productivity and increase our operating expenses. Although we have instituted programs to monitor and control environmental risks and promote compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, if we are involved in a spill or other accident involving hazardous substances, if there are releases of hazardous substances we transport, or if we are found to be in violation of applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to liabilities, including substantial fines or penalties or civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

 

If we cannot effectively manage the challenges associated with doing business internationally, our operating revenue and profitability may suffer.

 

A component of our operations is the business we conduct in Mexico, and to a lesser extent Canada, and we are subject to risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign currencies, changes in the economic strength of Mexico and Canada, difficulties in enforcing contractual obligations and intellectual property rights, burdens of complying with a wide variety of international and United States export and import laws, and social, political, and economic instability. Additional risks associated with our foreign operations, including restrictive trade policies and imposition of duties, taxes, or government royalties by foreign governments, are present but largely mitigated by the terms of NAFTA.

 

Litigation may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Our business is subject to the risk of litigation by employees, independent contractor drivers, customers, vendors, government agencies, stockholders, and other parties through private actions, class actions, administrative proceedings, regulatory actions, and other processes. Recently, trucking companies have been subject to lawsuits, including class action lawsuits, alleging violations of various federal and state wage and hour laws regarding, among other things, employee meal breaks, rest periods, overtime eligibility, and failure to pay for all hours worked. A number of these lawsuits have resulted in the payment of substantial settlements or damages by the defendants.

 

The outcome of litigation, particularly class action lawsuits and regulatory actions, is difficult to assess or quantify, and the magnitude of the potential loss relating to such lawsuits may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. The cost to defend litigation may also be significant. Not all claims are covered by our insurance, and there can be no assurance that our coverage limits will be adequate to cover all amounts in dispute. To the extent we experience claims that are uninsured, exceed our coverage limits, involve significant aggregate use of our self-insured retention amounts, or cause increases in future premiums, the resulting expenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

 

We depend on the proper functioning, availability, and security of our information and communication systems, and a systems failure or unavailability or a security breach could cause a significant disruption to and adversely affect our business.

 

We depend on the proper functioning, availability, and security of our information and communication systems, including financial reporting and operating systems, in operating our business.  These systems are protected through physical and software safeguards, but are still vulnerable to fire, storm, flood, power loss, telecommunications failures, physical or software break-ins, terrorist attacks, Internet failures, computer viruses, and similar events beyond our control.  If the information or communication systems fail, otherwise become unavailable, or experience a security breach, manually performing functions could temporarily impact our ability to manage our fleet efficiently, to respond to customers’ requests effectively, to maintain billing and other records reliably, to bill for services accurately or in a timely manner, to communicate internally and with drivers, customers, and vendors, and to prepare financial statements accurately or in a timely manner. Business interruption insurance may be inadequate to protect us in the event of a catastrophe. Any system failure, upgrade complication, security breach, or other system disruption could interrupt or delay operations, damage our reputation, impact our ability to manage our operations and report financial performance, and cause the loss of customers, any of which could have a material adverse effect on existing and future business.

 

 

We are in the midst of a multi-year process to migrate our legacy mainframe platform and internally developed software applications to server-based platforms.  We still have a few remaining systems to convert, and could experience delays, complications, or additional costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.  We anticipate the legacy mainframe applications should be completely migrated to newer platforms during 2016.

 

During 2014, we began to host all of our production systems at a remote data center designed to store and preserve our data. This data center replicates all production data back to the data center at our headquarters, which protects our information in the event of a fire or other significant disaster. This redundant data center allows the data related to our systems to be recovered following an incident. However, recovery of such data may not immediately restore our ability to utilize our information and communications systems. In the event such systems were significantly damaged, it could take several days before our systems regain functionality. Additionally, although we attempt to reduce the risk of disruption to our business operations should a disaster occur through redundant computer systems and networks, such as the one described above, and other backup systems, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective in restoring lost data or restoring the functionality of our information and communication systems. 

 

We receive and transmit confidential data with and among our customers, drivers, vendors, employees, and service providers in the normal course of business. Despite our implementation of secure transmission techniques, internal data security measures, and monitoring tools, our information and communication systems are vulnerable to security threats and breach attempts from both external and internal sources. Any such breach could result in disruption of communications with our customers, drivers, vendors, employees, and service providers and access, viewing, misappropriation, altering, or deleting information in our systems, including customer, driver, vendor, employee, and service provider information and our proprietary business information. A security breach could damage our business operations and reputation and could cause us to incur costs associated with repairing our systems, increased security, customer notifications, lost operating revenue, litigation, regulatory action, and reputational damage.

 

Seasonality and the impact of weather affect our operations and profitability.

 

Our tractor productivity decreases during the winter season because inclement weather impedes operations, and some shippers reduce their shipments after the winter holiday season. Revenue can also be affected by bad weather and holidays, since revenue is directly related to available working days of shippers. At the same time, operating expenses increase, with fuel efficiency declining because of engine idling and harsh weather creating higher accident frequency, increased claims, and more equipment repairs. We could also suffer short-term impacts from weather-related events such as hurricanes, blizzards, ice storms and floods that could make our results of operations more volatile. Consequently, weather and other seasonal events could adversely affect our operating results.

 

We face various risks associated with stockholder activists.

 

Activist stockholders have advocated for certain changes at the Company. Such activist stockholders or potential stockholders may attempt to gain additional representation on or control of our board of directors, the possibility of which may create uncertainty regarding our future. These perceived uncertainties may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel, raise customer concerns, or cause volatility in the price of our common stock. The presence of such activist stockholders also may create a significant distraction for our management team and require us to expend significant time and resources, depending on the nature of the activists’ activities. We have entered into cooperation agreements with certain activist stockholders, which contain certain restrictions on such stockholders’ ability to vote their shares other than in accordance with our board of directors’ recommendations and require such stockholders to abide by certain standstill provisions. However, the restrictions and requirements in these cooperation agreements are scheduled to end on the date that is 10 days prior to the expiration of the advance notice period for stockholder nomination of directors at our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders. We cannot assure you that we will be able to agree to terms for similar agreements with any other activist stockholders that might acquire an interest in our Company.

 

 

A potential proxy contest would be disruptive to our operations and cause it to incur substantial costs. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed to give stockholders the ability to include their director nominees and their proposals relating to a stockholder nomination process in our proxy materials, which would make it easier for activists to nominate directors to our board of directors. The Commission’s proposed rule was struck down by a federal court in 2011. However, in recent years, many public companies have received, and in some instances adopted, stockholder proposals allowing certain stockholders the ability to nominate directors to such company’s board of directors, and we may receive similar stockholder proposals. Future stockholder proposals, proxy contests and the presence of additional activist stockholder nominees on our board of directors could interfere with our ability to execute our long-term turnaround plan and other strategic initiatives, be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations, and divert the attention of our management and employees.

 

Additionally, we could be subjected to activist stockholder lawsuits. Such lawsuits are time-consuming and could require us to incur substantial legal fees and proxy costs in defending our position. Among other things, such lawsuits divert management's time and attention from operations and can also cause distractions among our employees.

 

Certain provisions of our corporate documents and Delaware law could deter acquisition proposals and make it difficult for a third party to acquire control of the Company. This could have a negative effect on the price of our common stock.

 

Provisions in our Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) may discourage, delay, or prevent a change of control or changes in our board of directors or management that our stockholders may consider favorable. For example, our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the board of directors to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock. Without stockholder approval, our board of directors has the authority to attach special rights, including voting and dividend rights, to this preferred stock, which could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire the Company. Our Certificate of Incorporation also provides:

 

●	for a classified board of directors, whereby directors serve for three-year terms, with approximately one-third of the directors coming up for re-election each year, making it more difficult for a third party to obtain control of the board of directors through a proxy contest;

●	that vacancies on the board of directors may be filled only by the remaining directors in office, even if only one director remains in office;

●	that directors may only be removed for “cause” and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of our outstanding common stock;

●	that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock is required to approve any merger or consolidation with any other business entity that requires approval of the stockholders;

●	that stockholders can only act by written consent if such consent is signed by the holders of at least 66 2/3% of our outstanding common stock; and

●	that each of the provisions set forth above may only be amended by the holders of at least 66 2/3% of our outstanding common stock.

 

Our Amended and Restated Bylaws also require advance notice of all stockholder proposals, including nominations for election as director, and provide that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, or by a majority of the board of directors. We have in the past adopted a stockholder rights plan, which was voluntarily terminated by the board of directors in April 2014, and may in the future adopt new stockholder rights plans. We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under these provisions, if anyone becomes an “interested stockholder,” we may not enter into a “business combination” with that person for three years without special approval, which could discourage a third party from making a takeover offer and could delay or prevent a change of control. For purposes of Section 203, “interested stockholder” means, generally, someone owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate of ours that owned 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock during the past three years, subject to certain exceptions as described in Section 203. These provisions will apply even if the change may be considered beneficial by some of our stockholders, and thereby negatively affect the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock. In addition, to the extent that these provisions discourage an acquisition of our Company or other change of control transaction, they could deprive stockholders of opportunities to realize takeover premiums for their shares of our common stock.

 

 

Knight Transportation, Inc.’s unsolicited takeover proposal was, and any future unsolicited offers may be, disruptive to our business.

 

In September 2013, Knight Transportation, Inc. (“Knight”) announced its unsolicited takeover proposal for our outstanding common stock. Responding to Knight’s unsolicited proposal, exploring the availability of alternative transactions that reflected our full intrinsic value and instituting legal action in connection with Knight’s tender offer created a significant distraction for our management team and required us to expend significant time and resources, and any future unsolicited proposals may lead to similar disruptions. Such proposals may disrupt our business by causing uncertainty among current and potential employees, suppliers, and customers, which could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and strategic initiatives and cause volatility in our stock price. These consequences, alone or in combination, may have a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, we have entered into a change of control/severance plan with certain of our officers and members of our management team. The participants of the change of control arrangements may be entitled to severance payments and benefits upon a termination of their employment by us without cause or by them for good reason in connection with a change of control of the Company (each as defined in the applicable plan). The change of control arrangements may not be adequate to allow us to retain critical employees during a time when a change of control is being proposed or is imminent.

 

Item 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

There are no unresolved written SEC staff comments regarding the Company’s periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 received 180 days or more before the end of the fiscal year to which this Form 10-K relates.

 

Item 2.

PROPERTIES

 

USA Truck’s executive offices and headquarters are located on approximately 104 acres in Van Buren, Arkansas. This facility consists of approximately 117,000 square feet of office, training, SCS and driver facilities and approximately 30,000 square feet of maintenance space. The headquarters also has approximately 11,000 square feet of warehouse space and two other structures with approximately 22,000 square feet of office and warehouse space which are currently leased to a third party.

 

 

The Company’s network consists of 20 facilities, which includes SCS offices and one terminal facility in Laredo, Texas, which is one of the largest inland freight gateway cities between the United States and Mexico, operated by a wholly owned subsidiary, International Freight Services, Inc. The Company is actively seeking locations for additional facilities as the Company expands its SCS footprint. As of December 31, 2015, the Company’s active facilities were located in or near the following cities:

 

		Shop		Driver Facilities		Fuel		Dispatch Office		Own or Lease
Trucking facilities:
Van Buren, Arkansas		Yes		Yes		No (1)		Yes		Own
West Memphis, Arkansas		Yes		Yes		No (1)		Yes		Own/Lease (2)
Atlanta, Georgia		Yes		Yes		No		Yes		Lease
Chicago, Illinois		Yes		Yes		No		No		Lease
Vandalia, Ohio		Yes		Yes		No (1)		No		Own
Spartanburg, South Carolina		Yes		Yes		No		No		Own
Laredo, Texas		Yes		Yes		No		Yes		Own/Lease (3)
SCS facilities:
Springdale, Arkansas		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Van Buren, Arkansas		Yes		Yes		No (1)		Yes		Own
Roseville, California		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Los Angeles, California		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Jacksonville, Florida		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Atlanta, Georgia		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Oak Brook, Illinois		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Kansas City, Kansas		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Buffalo, New York		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Addison, Texas		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
El Paso, Texas		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Salt Lake City, Utah		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Seattle, Washington		No		No		No		Yes		Lease
Administrative facilities:
Burns Harbor, Indiana		No		No		No		Yes		Lease

 

(1)

Infrastructure is in place, but not currently utilized.

(2)

USA Truck, Inc. owns the terminal facility and holds an easement relating to less than one acre.

(3)

USA Truck, Inc. owns the terminal facility and leases an adjacent four acres for tractor and trailer parking.

 

Item 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

USA Truck is a party to routine litigation incidental to its business, primarily involving claims for personal injury and property damage incurred in the transportation of freight. Though the Company believes these claims to be routine and immaterial to its long-term financial position, adverse results of one or more of these claims could have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flow in a quarter or annual reporting period.

 

Item 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

None.

 

PART II

 

Item 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

USA Truck’s common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “USAK.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices of the Company’s common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

 

		2015								2014
		High				Low				High				Low
Quarter Ended:
March 31		$	32.14			$	25.01			$	15.77			$	11.95
June 30			29.08				21.19				19.57				14.67
September 30			24.29				16.33				19.50				16.59
December 31			21.32				15.99				28.70				13.90

 

 

As of February 12, 2016, there were 181 holders of record (including brokerage firms and other nominees) of USA Truck common stock. On February 12, 2016, the closing price per share of USA Truck common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was $16.11.

 

Dividend Policy

 

The Company has not paid any dividends on its common stock to date, and does not anticipate paying any dividends at the present time. The Company currently intends to retain all of its earnings, if any, for use in the expansion and development of its business and reduction of debt. The Company’s Credit Facility places restrictions on its ability to pay dividends. Future payments of dividends will depend upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, capital commitments, restrictions under then-existing agreements, and other factors the Company deems relevant.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

For information on USA Truck’s equity compensation plans, please refer to Item 12 of Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table provides certain information, as of December 31, 2015, with respect to the Company’s compensation plans and other arrangements under which shares of common stock are authorized for issuance.  

 

Plan Category		Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights				Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights				Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
		(a)				(b)				(c)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders			15,610	(1)		$	5.40	(2)			364,235	(3)
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders			--				--				--
Total			15,610			$	5.40				364,235

 

(1)

Includes only common stock subject to outstanding stock options and does not include: (i) 25,052 unvested shares of restricted stock, which will vest in annual increments, subject to the attainment of specified performance goals, and which do not require the payment of exercise prices and (ii) 85,889 unvested shares of restricted stock, which will vest in annual increments, and which do not require the payment of exercise prices. These 110,941 shares exclude 4,376 shares from layers 6-7 of performance based restricted stock which have been deemed forfeited in prior years. Such forfeitures will become effective in varying amounts in April of 2015 through 2017.

 

(2)

Excludes shares of restricted stock, which do not require the payment of exercise prices.

 

(3)

The 364,235 shares that remain available for future grants may be granted as stock options under our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, or alternatively, be issued as restricted stock, stock units, performance shares, performance units or other incentives payable in cash or stock.

  

 

 

Repurchase of Equity Securities

 

The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases of the Company’s common stock made by or on behalf of USA Truck during the quarter ended December 31, 2015:

 

Period		(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased				(b) Weighted Average Price Paid per Share				(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs				(d) Maximum Number of Common Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
October 1-31, 2015
Repurchase Program (1)			216,023			$	18.85				216,023				537,998
Other Transactions (2)			--				--				--				--
November 1-30, 2015
Repurchase Program (1)			239,300			$	19.12				239,300				298,698
Other Transactions (2)			48			$	19.92				--				--
December 1-31, 2015
Repurchase Program (1)			252,436			$	18.16				252,436				46,262
Other Transactions (2)			--				--				--				--
Total			707,807			$	18.69				707,759				46,262

(1)

In July 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock over a three-year period ending July 28, 2018. Share repurchases, if any, will be made using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or block trades, or any combination of such methods, in accordance with applicable insider trading and other securities laws and regulations. During the quarter ended December 31, 2015, the Company repurchased a total of 707,759 shares at a weighted average price of $18.69 per share for an aggregate cost of approximately $13.2 million. As of December 31, 2015, 953,738 shares were repurchased and on January 8, 2016, the Company had repurchased the full million shares of common stock included in the repurchase program authorized in 2015.

(2)

Shares of common stock withheld to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares. The withholding of shares was permitted under the applicable award agreements and was not part of any stock repurchase plan.

 

Item 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

Change in Accounting Principles

 

During 2015, the Company changed its accounting policy for tires. Prior to this change, the cost of the replacement tires placed in service was reported as prepaid tires and amortized based on estimated usage of the tires. Under the new policy, the cost of tires mounted on purchased revenue equipment is capitalized as part of the total equipment cost and is depreciated over the useful life of the related equipment. Subsequent replacement tires are expensed at the time those tires are placed in service. Management believes this new policy is preferable under the circumstances because it provides a more precise method for recognizing expenses related to tires consistent with industry practice. Comparative financial statements for all prior periods have been recast to apply the new policy retrospectively, and are reflected under columns marked “Recast”.

 

During November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”, which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes. ASU 2015-17 requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent in a statement of financial position. The Company has early adopted ASU 2015-17 effective December 31, 2015 on a retrospective basis. Adoption of this ASU resulted in a reclassification of the Company’s net current deferred tax asset as an offset to the net noncurrent deferred tax liability in its Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014. The reclassification resulted in a $7.7 million decrease in the current deferred income tax asset and the long-term noncurrent deferred income tax liability. Comparative financial statements for all prior periods have been recast to apply the new policy retrospectively, and are reflected under columns marked “Recast”.

 

 

 

Select Financial Data

 

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K (dollar amounts in thousands).

 

		Year Ended December 31,
		2015				2014				2013				2012				2011
						(Recast)				(Recast)				(Recast)				(Recast)
Consolidated statement of operations data:
Operating revenue		$	507,934			$	602,477			$	555,005			$	512,428			$	519,408
Operating income (loss)			23,071				17,653				(10,101	)			(23,446	)			(13,565	)
Net income (loss)			11,069				6,285				(9,993	)			(17,778	)			(11,341	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share			1.06				0.60				(0.97	)			(1.72	)			(1.10	)
Consolidated balance sheet data:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	87			$	205			$	14			$	1,742			$	2,659
Total assets			286,456				303,944				301,552				322,321				327,191
Long-term debt, capital leases and note payable, including current portion			101,435				117,512				128,891				138,285				119,443
Stockholders’ equity			93,777				99,068				92,397				102,172				119,821
Total debt, less cash, to total capitalization ratio			51.9	%			54.2	%			58.2	%			56.8	%			48.8	%
Other financial data:
Adjusted operating ratio (1) (unaudited)			94.3	%			96.4	%			100.9	%			105.7	%			103.3	%

(1)

Non-GAAP Financial Measure Reconciliation – Unaudited

 

The Company reports certain financial measures that are not prescribed or authorized by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Management’s reasons for reporting these non-GAAP measures are provided below, and the accompanying tables reconcile the most directly comparable GAAP measures to the non-GAAP measures.

 

USA Truck uses the term “adjusted operating ratio” throughout this Form 10-K. Adjusted operating ratio, as defined here, is a non-GAAP financial measure, as defined by the SEC. Management uses adjusted operating ratio as a supplement to the Company’s GAAP results in evaluating certain aspects of its business, as described below.

 

Adjusted operating ratio is calculated as operating expenses less unusual items, net of fuel surcharges, as a percentage of operating revenue excluding fuel surcharge revenue.

 

USA Truck’s Board of Directors and chief operating decision-makers also focus on adjusted operating ratio as an indicator of the Company’s performance from period to period. Management believes fuel surcharge can be volatile and eliminating the impact of this source of revenue (by netting fuel surcharge revenue against fuel expense) affords a more consistent basis for comparing results of operations.

 

Management believes its presentation of adjusted operating ratio is useful because it provides investors and securities analysts the same information that the Company uses internally for purposes of assessing its core operating performance.

 

 

Adjusted operating ratio is not a substitute for operating margin or any other measure derived solely from GAAP measures. There are limitations to using non-GAAP measures such as adjusted operating ratio. Although management believes that adjusted operating ratio can make an evaluation of the Company’s operating performance more consistent because it removes items that, in management’s opinion, do not reflect its core operating performance, other companies in the transportation industry may define adjusted operating ratio differently. As a result, it may be difficult to use adjusted operating ratio or similarly named non-GAAP measures that other companies may use to compare the performance of those companies to USA Truck’s performance.

 

Consolidated Reconciliations

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Regulation G, reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures have been provided in the table below for operating ratio (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

		Year Ended December 31,
		2015				2014				2013				2012				2011
						(Recast)				(Recast)				(Recast)				(Recast)
Operating revenue		$	507,934			$	602,477			$	555,005			$	512,428			$	519,408
Less:
Fuel surcharge revenue			58,981				108,133				111,150				103,709				108,382
Base revenue			448,953				494,344				443,855				408,719				411,026
Operating expense			484,863				584,824				565,106				535,874				532,973
Adjusted for:
Long-term claims liability reserve adjustment (1)			--				--				(5,970	)			--				--
Restructuring, severance and related charges (2)			(2,742	)			--				--				--				--
Fuel surcharge revenue			(58,981	)			(108,133	)			(111,150	)			(103,709	)			(108,382	)
Adjusted operating expense		$	423,140			$	476,691			$	447,986			$	432,165			$	424,591
Operating ratio			95.5	%			97.1	%			101.8	%			104.6	%			102.6	%
Adjusted operating ratio			94.3	%			96.4	%			100.9	%			105.7	%			103.3	%

 

Segment Reconciliations

 

Trucking Segment		Year Ended
		December 31,
		2015				2014				2013
						(Recast)				(Recast)
Revenue		$	356,528			$	424,082			$	418,601
Less: intersegment eliminations			2,048				587				486
Operating revenue			354,480				423,495				418,115
Less: fuel surcharge revenue			46,799				87,198				91,840
Base revenue		$	307,681			$	336,297			$	326,275
Operating expense		$	343,392			$	426,617			$	437,216
Adjusted for:
Long-term claims liability reserve adjustment (1)			--				--				(5,970	)
Restructuring, severance and related charges (2)			(2,742	)			--				--
Fuel surcharge revenue			(46,799	)			(87,198	)			(91,840	)
Adjusted operating expense		$	293,851			$	339,419			$	339,406
Operating ratio			96.9	%			100.7	%			104.6	%
Adjusted operating ratio			95.5	%			100.9	%			104.0	%

  

 

SCS Segment		Year Ended
		December 31,
		2015				2014				2013
Revenue		$	158,295			$	192,924			$	146,492
Less: intersegment eliminations			4,841				13,942				9,602
Operating revenue			153,454				178,982				136,890
Less: fuel surcharge revenue			12,182				20,935				19,310
Base revenue		$	141,272			$	158,047			$	117,580
Operating expense		$	141,471			$	158,207			$	127,890
Adjusted for:
Fuel surcharge revenue			(12,182	)			(20,935	)			(19,310	)
Adjusted operating expense		$	129,289			$	137,272			$	108,580
Operating ratio			92.2	%			88.4	%			93.4	%
Adjusted operating ratio			91.5	%			86.9	%			92.3	%

(1)

During 2013, management conducted an in-depth review of its long-term claims liability and engaged a third party actuary and recorded an increase of $6.0 million to its long-term claims liability.

(2)

During 2015, the Company recognized $2.7 million in restructuring, severance and related charges relating to the termination of employment of certain executives and the closure of two maintenance facilities. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 14: Restructuring, severance and related charges” in this Form 10-K for further discussion.

 

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read together with the Business section in Part 1, Item 1, as well as the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes in Part II, Item 8, of this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” Part I “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements,” and elsewhere in this report. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed herein. MD&A summarizes the financial statements from management’s perspective with respect to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other factors that may affect actual results.

 

The MD&A is organized in the following sections:

 

●

Overview

●

Results of Operations

●

Liquidity and Capital Resources

●

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

●

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

●

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Overview 

 

USA Truck offers a broad range of truckload and logistics services to a diversified customer base that spans a variety of industries. The Company has two reportable segments: (i) trucking, consisting of one-way truckload services, in which volumes typically are not contractually committed, and dedicated contract services, in which a combination of equipment and drivers is contractually committed to a particular customer, typically for a duration of at least one year, and (ii) SCS, consisting of freight brokerage and rail intermodal service offerings, in which the Company retains control of the customer relationship and contract for the use of a third party’s transportation assets. The trucking segment provides truckload transportation, including dedicated services, of various products, goods, and materials. The Company’s SCS service offering matches customer shipments with available equipment of authorized carriers and provides services that complement the Company’s trucking operations. SCS provides these services primarily to existing trucking customers, many of whom prefer to rely on a single carrier, or a small group of carriers, to provide all their transportation solutions.

 

 

Revenue for the Company’s trucking segment is substantially generated by transporting freight for customers, and is predominantly affected by the rates per mile received from customers, the number of tractors in operation, and the number of revenue generating miles per tractor. USA Truck enhances its trucking operating revenue by charging for fuel surcharge, stop-off pay, loading and unloading activities, tractor and trailer detention and other ancillary services.

 

Operating expenses that have a major impact on the profitability of the trucking segment are primarily the variable costs or mostly variable costs of transporting freight for customers. These costs include driver salaries and benefits, fuel and fuel taxes, payments to independent contractors, operating and maintenance expense and insurance and claims. In addition, the fixed or mostly fixed costs associated with non-driving personnel, terminal infrastructure, and depreciation, interest, rent, and gain or loss on disposition of revenue equipment, can significantly affect the Company’s margins to the extent revenue from this segment is spread over more or less fixed cost burden.

 

To mitigate exposure to fuel price increases, the Company recovers from its customers additional fuel surcharges that generally recoup a majority of the increased fuel costs; however, the Company cannot assure the recovery levels experienced in the past will continue in future periods. Although its fuel surcharge program mitigates some exposure to rising fuel costs, the Company continues to have exposure to increasing fuel costs related to empty miles, fuel inefficiency due to engine idle time, and other factors, including the extent to which the surcharge paid by the customer is insufficient to compensate for fuel expense, particularly in times of rapidly increasing fuel prices. The main factors that affect fuel surcharge revenue are the price of diesel fuel and the number of loaded miles. The fuel surcharge is billed on a lagging basis, meaning the Company typically bills customers in the current week based on the previous week’s applicable United States Department of Energy, or DOE, index. Therefore, in times of increasing fuel prices, the Company does not recover as much as it is currently paying for fuel. In periods of declining prices, the opposite is true.

 

The key statistics used to evaluate trucking revenue, net of fuel surcharge, are (i) base trucking revenue per seated tractor per week (ii) average miles per seated tractor per week, (iii) average base revenue per loaded mile, (iv) deadhead percentage, (v) average loaded miles per trip and (vi) average number of seated tractors. In general, the Company’s average miles per tractor per week, rate per mile, and deadhead percentage are affected by industry-wide freight volumes, industry-wide trucking capacity and the competitive environment, which factors are beyond the Company’s control, as well as by its service levels and efficiency of its operations, over which the Company has significant control.

 

The SCS segment provides services that complement trucking services, primarily to existing customers of the trucking segment. Unlike the trucking segment, the SCS segment is non asset based and is instead dependent upon qualified employees, information systems and qualified third-party capacity providers. The largest expense related to the SCS segment is purchased transportation expense. Other operating expenses consist primarily of salaries, wages and benefits. The Company evaluates the SCS segment’s financial performance by reviewing the gross margin percentage (revenue less purchased transportation expenses expressed as a percentage of revenue) and the operating income percentage. The gross margin can be impacted by fluctuations in freight volumes and industry-wide trucking capacity. SCS often achieves better gross margins during periods of imbalance between supply and demand than times of balanced supply and demand, although periods of transition to tight capacity also can compress margins. In addition, SCS operating income percentage is impacted by gross margin and by the amount of revenue we are able to spread across our personnel and technology costs.

 

USA Truck generated earnings per share, or EPS, of $1.06 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to $0.60 per diluted share in 2014. The growth in EPS was driven primarily by improvements in the Company’s trucking operating segment, where an improvement of $14.2 million in operating income more than offset an $8.8 million reduction in operating income in the Company’s SCS segment. The trucking segment adjusted operating ratio decreased 540 basis points to 95.5% in 2015, compared to 100.9% in 2014. This was primarily due to the strategy to decrease the fleet during 2015, by a net 417 tractors as the Company focused on its network, customer profitability and reduce its unseated tractors in its trucking segment . This reduction in tractors enabled the Company to sell high cost tractors and trailers, which generated $6.4 million or 210 basis points improvement in adjusted operating ratio. The other main factors that contributed to higher operating income in the Company’s trucking segment were: lower diesel fuel prices, higher base revenue per loaded mile, and cost control initiatives. The main factor that contributed to lower operating income in the Company’s SCS segment was lower revenue per SCS employee in 2015, compared with 2014, as a result of the extraordinary imbalance of freight demand in excess of trucking capacity experienced in 2014 returning to more normalized levels in 2015.

 

Moving forward, the Company’s goals are to grow revenues, improve asset utilization, and strive for additional cost and process improvements. By focusing on these areas, management believes it will make progress on its goals of improving the Company’s return on invested capital and stockholder value.

 

 

Results of Operations 

 

The following tables summarize the consolidated statements of operations (dollar amounts in thousands) and percentage of consolidated operating revenue and the percentage increase or decrease in the dollar amounts of those items compared to the prior year.

 

		2015												2014												% Change in
		$				% Operating Revenue				% Base Revenue (3)				$				% Operating Revenue				% Base Revenue (3)				Dollar Amounts
														(Recast)
Base revenue		$	448,953				88.4	%						$	494,344				82.1	%							(9.2	)%
Fuel surcharge revenue			58,981				11.6								108,133				17.9								(45.5	)
Operating revenue		$	507,934				100.0	%						$	602,477				100.0	%							(15.7	)
Operating expenses			484,863				95.5	%			94.3	%			584,824				97.1	%			96.4	%			(17.1	)%
Operating income			23,071				4.5				5.7				17,653				2.9				3.6				30.7
Other expenses:
Interest expense			2,237				0.4				0.5				3,008				0.5				0.6				(25.6	)
Defense costs (1)			--				--				--				2,764				0.5				0.6				(100.0	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt (2)			750				0.2				0.2				--				--				--				100.0
Other, net			743				0.1				0.1				245				--				--				203.3
Total other expenses, net			3,730				0.7				0.8				6,017				1.0				1.2				(38.0	)
Income before income taxes			19,341				3.8				4.9				11,636				1.9				2.4				66.2
Income tax expense			8,272				1.6				1.8				5,351				0.9				1.1				54.6
Net income		$	11,069				2.2	%			3.1	%		$	6,285				1.0	%			1.3	%			76.1	%

 

 

		2014												2013												% Change in
		$				% Operating Revenue				% Base Revenue (3)				$				% Operating Revenue				% Base Revenue(3)				Dollar Amounts
		(Recast)												(Recast)
Base revenue		$	494,344				82.1	%						$	443,855				80.0	%							11.4	%
Fuel surcharge revenue			108,133				17.9								111,150				20.0								(2.7	)
Operating revenue		$	602,477				100.0	%						$	555,005				100.0	%							8.6
Operating expenses			584,824				97.1	%			96.4	%			565,106				101.8	%			100.9	%			3.5	%
Operating income			17,653				2.9				3.6				(10,101	)			(1.8	)			(0.9	)			274.8
Other expenses:
Interest expense			3,008				0.5				0.6				3,662				0.7				0.8				(17.9	)
Defense costs (1)			2,764				0.5				0.6				1,480				0.2				0.3				86.8
Other, net			245				--				--				(711	)			(0.1	)			(0.2	)			134.5
Total other expenses, net			6,017				1.0				1.2				4,431				0.8				0.9				35.8
Income (loss) before income taxes			11,636				1.9				2.4				(14,532	)			(2.6	)			(1.8	)			180.1
Income tax expense (benefit)			5,351				0.9				1.1				(4,539	)			(0.8	)			(0.9	)			217.9
Net income		$	6,285				1.0	%			1.3	%			(9,993	)			(1.8	)%			(0.9	)%			162.9	%

(1)

Defense costs are the legal and related costs incurred in connection with the unsolicited proposal from another trucking Company to acquire USA Truck and related litigation and activists costs, pretax.

(2)

Loss on extinguishment of debt represents the write-off of the deferred financing fees associated with the previous revolving credit facility.

(3)

The percent of base revenue calculation for operating expenses is calculated as operating expenses, net of fuel surcharges and unusual items, as a percent of operating revenue excluding fuel surcharge revenue. This presentation adjusts the unusual items associated with the claims reserve liability adjustment of $6.0 million in 2013 and the restructuring, severance and related charges of $2.7 million in 2015.

  

 

Results of Operations—Segment Review

 

		Year Ended December 31,
		2015				2014				2013
Trucking:						(Recast)				(Recast)
Operating revenue (in thousands)		$	354,480			$	423,495			$	418,115
Operating income (loss) (in thousands) (1)			11,088				(3,122	)			(19,101	)
Adjusted operating ratio (2)			95.5	%			100.9	%			104.0	%
Total miles (in thousands) (3)			186,686				215,479				223,923
Deadhead percentage (4)			12.6	%			12.7	%			11.8	%
Base revenue per loaded mile			1.885				1.788				1.654
Average number of in-service tractors (5)			1,970				2,202				2,232
Average number of seated tractors (6)			1,824				2,047				2,119
Average miles per seated tractor per week			1,963				2,019				2,027
Base revenue per seated tractor per week		$	3,235			$	3,151			$	2,957
Average loaded miles per trip			582				612				599
Strategic Capacity Solutions:
Operating revenue (in thousands)		$	153,454			$	178,982			$	136,890
Operating income (in thousands) (1)			11,983				20,775				9,000
Gross margin (7)			18.0	%			17.7	%			14.2	%

(1)

Operating income or loss is calculated by deducting operating expenses from operating revenue.

(2)

Trucking segment adjusted operating ratio (non-GAAP) presented as if fuel surcharges and unusual items are excluded from operating revenue and instead reported as a reduction of operating expenses, excluding intersegment activity. Pursuant to the requirements of Regulation G, reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures have been provided in Part 1, Item 6. Selected Financial Data in this Form 10-K.

(3)

Total miles include both loaded and empty miles.

(4)

Deadhead percentage is calculated by dividing empty miles into total miles.

(5)

Tractors include company-operated tractors in service, plus tractors operated by independent contractors.

(6)

Seated tractors are those occupied by drivers.

(7)

Gross margin is calculated by taking revenue less purchased transportation expense and dividing that amount by revenue. This calculation includes intercompany revenue and expenses and fuel surcharge revenue.

 

Trucking operating revenue

 

During 2015, the Company completed its plan to downsize its tractor fleet by approximately 400 tractors to help focus on its network, customer profitability and reduce its unseated tractors in its trucking segment. This plan contributed to an 8.5% decrease in base revenue due to 10.9% less seated tractors which generated 13.2% lower loaded miles partially offset by a 2.7% increase in average base revenue per tractor per week. Fuel surcharge revenue was down primarily due to the lower loaded miles as well as the 30.4% lower DOE average price of diesel fuel throughout 2015. Management believes that the tractor fleet hit its lowest level during the third quarter of 2015 and will continue to focus on improving the utility of the trucks throughout 2016 before adding additional tractors into the fleet.

 

During 2014, the increases in trucking’s operating revenue were primarily the result of a 6.7% increase in the trucking base revenue per seated tractor per week, driven by a 8.3% increase in trucking base revenue per loaded mile. The increase in trucking operating revenue was partially offset by a decrease of 72 seated tractors in 2014, compared to 2013.

 

Trucking operating income (loss)

 

The improvement in trucking operating income was driven primarily by a $6.4 million increase in gain on sale of equipment (210 basis point improvement in adjusted operating ratio) associated with the plan to downsize the tractor fleet in 2015. This reduction of the high cost tractors in the fleet has positioned the Company with a tractor fleet age of 26.5 months and management believes it will be able to continue to improve its recruiting of experienced drivers and maintenance expense during 2016. Additionally, improvements in pricing (540 basis point improvement in base revenue per loaded mile) and fuel expense were partially offset by a 3.9% increase in driver wages during 2015.

 

 

During 2014, the improvement in operating ratio and adjusted operating ratio was primarily driven by the increase in average base revenue per loaded mile noted above, a continued focus on controlling costs, and a 7.6% improvement in the fuel economy (measured by miles per gallon) in Company tractors due to specific ongoing initiatives targeted at improving fuel efficiency, as well as the addition of more fuel efficient tractors to the Company’s fleet. Additionally, overall lower fuel pricing during 2014 yielded savings for the Company of approximately $5.8 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

SCS operating revenue

 

Decreases in operating revenue resulted primarily from 1.0% lower load volumes and lower pricing, both of which were directly related to the softened spot market experienced during 2015. Total revenue per employee decreased 25.1% during 2015, primarily due to the expansion of two new offices in 2015, resulting in a 14.4% increase in headcount to support the anticipated growth of this segment as well as higher transportation costs charged by carriers.

 

Increased revenues during 2014 were primarily related to an approximate 10% increase in load volumes, and a 30.2% increase in operating revenue per SCS employee over the levels experienced in 2013. All were directly related to the capacity constraints brought on by challenging weather conditions and driver shortages.

 

SCS operating income

 

Decreases in SCS operating income resulted from headcount continuing to exceed the revenue base, as revenue growth was dampened as a result of the softer freight market. Accordingly, gross profit per employee decreased 26.8%, compared to the same period in 2014. The opposite occurred in 2014, compared to 2013, when gross profit per SCS employee grew 63.1% in a robust market.

 

Consolidated Operating Expenses

 

The following table summarizes the consolidated operating expenses (dollar amounts in thousands) and percentage of consolidated operating revenue, consolidated base revenue and the percentage increase or decrease in the dollar amounts of those items compared to the prior year.

 

		2015												2014												% Change
		$				% Operating Revenue				% Base Revenue (1)				$				% Operating Revenue				% Base Revenue (1)				2015 to 2014
														(Recast)
Operating Expenses:
Salaries, wages and employee benefits		$	140,649				27.7	%			31.3	%		$	153,410				25.5	%			31.0	%			(8.3	)%
Fuel and fuel taxes			58,511				11.5				13.0				116,092				19.3				23.5				(49.6	)
Depreciation and amortization			37,480				7.4				8.3				44,071				7.3				8.9				(15.0	)
Insurance and claims			21,183				4.2				4.7				24,910				4.1				5.0				(15.0	)
Equipment rents			4,424				0.9				1.0				3,089				0.5				0.6				43.2
Operations and maintenance			39,644				7.8				8.8				45,634				7.6				9.2				(13.1	)
Purchased transportation			161,370				31.8				35.9				172,117				28.6				34.8				(6.2	)
Operating taxes and licenses			5,720				1.1				1.3				5,589				0.9				1.1				2.3
Communications and utilities			3,599				0.7				0.8				4,062				0.7				0.8				(11.4	)
Gain on sale of assets			(7,547	)			(1.5	)			(1.7	)			(1,107	)			(0.2	)			(0.2	)			581.8
Restructuring, severance and related charges			2,742				0.5				0.6				--				--				--				100.0
Other			17,088				3.4				3.8				16,957				2.8				3.4				0.8
Total operating expenses		$	484,863				95.5	%			94.3	%		$	584,824				97.1	%			96.4	%			(17.1	)%

  

 

		2014												2013												% Change
		$				% Operating Revenue				% Base Revenue (1)				$				% Operating Revenue				% Base Revenue (1)				2014 to 2013
		(Recast)												(Recast)
Operating Expenses:
Salaries, wages and employee benefits		$	153,410				25.5	%			31.0	%		$	143,762				25.9	%			32.4	%			6.7	%
Fuel and fuel taxes			116,092				19.3				23.5				135,548				24.4				30.5				(14.4	)
Depreciation and amortization			44,071				7.3				8.9				44,947				8.1				10.1				(1.9	)
Insurance and claims			24,910				4.1				5.0				27,253				4.9				6.1				(8.6	)
Equipment rents			3,089				0.5				0.6				--				--				--				100.0
Operations and maintenance			45,634				7.6				9.2				50,928				9.2				11.5				(10.4	)
Purchased transportation			172,117				28.6				34.8				139,091				25.1				31.3				23.7
Operating taxes and licenses			5,589				0.9				1.1				5,406				1.0				1.2				3.4
Communications and utilities			4,062				0.7				0.8				4,117				0.7				0.9				(1.3	)
Gain on sale of assets			(1,107	)			(0.2	)			(0.2	)			(1,648	)			(0.3	)			(0.4	)			32.8
Other			16,957				2.8				3.4				15,702				2.8				3.5				8.0
Total operating expenses		$	584,824				97.1	%			96.4	%		$	565,106				101.8	%			100.9	%			3.5	%

(1)

The percent of base revenue calculation for operating expenses is calculated as operating expenses, net of fuel surcharges and unusual items, as a percent of operating revenue excluding fuel surcharge revenue. This presentation adjusts the unusual items associated with the claims reserve liability adjustment of $6.0 million in 2013 and the restructuring, severance and related charges of $2.7 million in 2015.

 

Salaries, wages and employee benefits 

 

Salaries, wages, and employee benefits consist primarily of compensation for all employees. Salaries, wages, and employee benefits are primarily affected by the total number of miles driven by Company drivers, the rate per mile the Company pays its Company drivers, employee benefits (including, but not limited to, health care and workers’ compensation), and to a lesser extent by the number of, and compensation and benefits paid to, non-driver employees.

 

The decreases experienced in salaries, wages and employee benefits expenses during 2015 were primarily due to a 15.6% decrease in the number of company drivers, a 10.9% reduction in the average seated truck count, offset by 3.9% higher driver pay. Also, during the third quarter, the Company enhanced its Paid Time Off (“PTO”) policy, converting from an anniversary date vesting period to a calendar year vesting period. The Company reversed approximately $1.4 million of its vacation reserve, as PTO is no longer accrued for carry over balances.

 

Salaries, wages, and employee benefit expenses for 2014 increased when compared to 2013, due to the continuation of increased driver labor costs in the tight market for drivers, as well as associated payroll taxes. During July 2014, the Company implemented a banded pay increase to its drivers which accounted for approximately $5.7 million of the increase in salaries, wages and employee benefits expense. Additionally, employee medical benefit costs increased approximately $3.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 2013.

 

The compensation paid to the Company drivers and other employees has increased and may need to increase further in future periods if the economy strengthens and other employment alternatives become more available. Furthermore, management believes that the market for drivers continues to tighten; therefore, it expects hiring expenses to continue to increase in order to attract a sufficient number of qualified drivers to operate the Company fleet.

 

Fuel and fuel taxes

 

Fuel and fuel taxes consist primarily of diesel fuel expense for Company-owned tractors and fuel taxes. The primary factors affecting the Company’s fuel expense are the cost of diesel fuel, the fuel economy of Company equipment, and the number of miles driven by company drivers.

 

During 2015, fuel and fuel taxes decreased compared to 2014, as a result of lower prices and volume, better fuel procurement and effectively managing the fuel surcharge program as well as the fleet reductions undertaken during the year. Of the $57.6 million reduction in fuel expense, $31.3 million resulted from decreased price per gallon, $25.3 million resulted from decreased volumes, and approximately $1.0 million resulted from increased equipment efficiencies. The decrease in the average age of the fleet contributed to a 1.0% increase in the Company miles per gallon during 2015.

 

 

During 2014, fuel and fuel taxes decreased compared to 2013, as a result of better efficiency, lower pricing and lower volumes. Improved fuel efficiency in the Company’s fleet resulted in savings of $9.1 million in 2014, compared to 2013. Overall fuel prices during 2014 yielded savings for the Company of approximately $5.8 million, compared to the 2013. Decreased volumes reflected savings to the Company of approximately $4.5 million, compared to the prior year.

 

The Company expects to continue managing its idle time and truck speeds, investing in more fuel-efficient, aerodynamic equipment to improve its fuel miles per gallon, locking in fuel hedges when deemed appropriate, and partnering with customers to adjust fuel surcharge programs that are inadequate to recover a fair portion of rising fuel costs. Going forward, the Company’s fuel and fuel taxes is expected to fluctuate as a percentage of operating revenue based on factors such as diesel fuel prices, percentage recovered from fuel surcharge programs, deadhead percentage, the percentage of revenue generated from independent contractors, and the success of fuel efficiency initiatives.

 

Equipment rents and depreciation and amortization

 

Equipment rents are those related to revenue equipment and other equipment and facilities under operating leases. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment consists primarily of depreciation for Company-owned tractors and trailers and amortization of those financed with capital leases. The primary factors affecting this expense include the number and age of Company tractors and trailers, the acquisition cost of new equipment, and the salvage values and useful lives assigned to the equipment. These largely fixed costs fluctuate as a percentage of base revenue primarily with increases and decreases in average base revenue per tractor and the percentage of base revenue contributed by trucking versus SCS.

 

During 2015, decreases in equipment rents and depreciation and amortization resulted primarily from a 15.6% reduction in the average number of Company tractors as part of the Company’s plan to downsize its tractor fleet, partially offset by a higher number of operating leases for revenue equipment due to more favorable lease terms. Moving forward, management expects to see decreases in equipment rents and depreciation and amortization expense due to the smaller size of its tractor and trailer fleet, partially offset by higher prices of new revenue equipment.

 

For 2014, the increase in equipment rents and depreciation and amortization expense reflected a small decrease in the number of tractors, offset by higher equipment replacement costs and by the Company entering into operating leases for revenue equipment.

 

Insurance and claims

 

Insurance and claims expense consists of insurance premiums and the accruals the Company makes for estimated payments and expenses for claims for bodily injury, property damage, cargo damage, and other casualty events. The primary factors affecting the Company’s insurance and claims expense are the number of miles driven by its Company drivers and independent contractors, the frequency and severity of accidents, trends in the development factors used in the Company’s actuarial accruals, and developments in prior-year claims.

 

The decrease in insurance and claims expense for 2015 was the result of lower frequency and severity experienced through the current year layer resulted in reduced claim expense. During 2015, the Company was able to reduce its cargo loss incurred by $1.0 million. The Company expects insurance and claims expense to improve over the long-term.

 

During 2014, excluding the $4.0 million actuarial adjustment recorded in December 2013, insurance and claims expense increased slightly, compared to 2013. This year-over-year increase was due primarily to the increase in reserves associated with unfavorable developments on prior year loss layers based on new information received during the current period.

 

Operations and maintenance

 

Operations and maintenance expense consists primarily of vehicle repairs and maintenance, general and administrative expenses, and other costs. Operating and maintenance expenses are primarily affected by the age of the Company-owned fleet of tractors and trailers, the number of miles driven in a period and, to a lesser extent, by efficiency measures in the Company’s maintenance facility.

 

 

Operations and maintenance expense decreases were primarily the result of the implementation of maintenance strategies focused on increased routine maintenance. During the third quarter of 2015, the Company outsourced its road assistance department and closed two of its facilities which did not fit into the network effectively. While fluctuations in repair costs are anticipated moving forward, management believes maintenance costs will trend downward over the long term as the Company has been able to decrease the average age of its revenue equipment.

 

Operations and maintenance expense decreased during 2014, compared to 2013. The decrease was primarily due to the increase in the routine maintenance program implemented in 2013, which generated lower costs for repairs performed over the road during 2014.

 

Purchased transportation

 

Purchased transportation consists of the payments the Company makes to independent contractors, railroads, and third-party carriers that haul loads brokered to them, including fuel surcharge reimbursement paid to such parties.

 

The decrease in purchased transportation expense was primarily associated with a 28.2% increase in the size of the Company’s independent contractor fleet, offset by a 14.3% decrease in SCS operating revenue. The Company is continuing to pursue its objective of growing its independent contractor fleet as a percentage of its total fleet, which could further increase purchased transportation expense. Increasing independent contractor capacity has shifted (and assuming all other factors remain equal, is expected to continue to shift) expenses to the purchased transportation line item with offsetting reductions in employee driver wages and related expenses, net of fuel (as independent contractors generate fuel surcharge revenue, while the related cost of their fuel is included with their compensation in purchased transportation), maintenance, and capital costs.

 

During 2014, purchased transportation expense increases were primarily resulted from the 34.4% operating revenue growth in the Company’s SCS segment and the 45.5% increase in the size of the Company’s independent contractor fleet, both related to the record breaking SCS operating revenue.

 

Gain on disposal of assets, net

 

The large increase in gain on disposal of assets, net, during 2015, reflects the completion of the Company’s plan to decrease the fleet through the accelerated disposal of older tractors to reduce the number of unseated tractors. Additionally, the Company disposed of approximately 1,300 high cost trailers, reducing the average age of the trailer fleet to 68 months. This has been a transformational year for the modernization of the Company’s revenue equipment and moving forward, the Company expects gains on the sale of revenue equipment to be less significant than in 2015.

 

Other expenses

 

Other expenses increased slightly, compared to the same period in 2014, primarily as a result of increases in consulting services, legal and professional fees, and licensing fees relating to technology upgrades.

 

For the year ended 2014, other expenses increased primarily as a result of an upward adjustment in the Company’s bad debt reserve during 2014, and increased expenses related to driver retention and recruiting.

 

Consolidated Non-Operating Expenses

 

Interest expense, net

 

The decrease in interest expense, net for 2015, resulted from the strategic shift to debt instruments that carry lower interest rates. The strengthening of the Company’s balance sheet has afforded the Company the opportunity to take advantage of historically low interest rates and replace its previous revolving credit facility with a new revolving credit facility. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 6: Long-Term Debt” in this Form 10-K for further discussion of the Company’s credit facility, which was entered into in February 2015.

 

During 2014, the decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the Company’s payments on its various financing arrangements throughout the year. The Company has focused on reducing debt balances as it has strengthened its balance sheet, which has afforded the opportunity to replace less favorable financing instruments with more advantageous ones.

 

Defense costs

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded $2.8 million in legal and defense costs, or $0.27 per diluted share, compared to approximately $1.5 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, in 2013. These costs were incurred primarily in connection with Knight Transportation’s unsolicited proposal to acquire USA Truck, the related litigation and the February 2014 Settlement Agreement.

 

  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

In February 2015, the Company entered into its new revolving Credit Facility (the “Credit Facility”), which resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $0.8 million in the first quarter of 2015, representing the write-off of the deferred financing fees associated with the previous revolving credit facility.

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

The Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were 42.8%, 46.0%, and 31.2%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate, when compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%, is primarily affected by state income taxes, net of federal income tax effect, and permanent differences, the most significant of which is the effect of the partially non-deductible per diem pay structure for our drivers. The recurring impact of this permanent non-deductible difference incurred in operating our business causes our tax rate to increase as our pretax earnings or loss approaches zero. Generally, as pretax income increases, the impact of the driver per diem program on our effective tax rate decreases, because aggregate per diem pay becomes smaller in relation to pretax income, while in periods where earnings are at or near breakeven the impact of the per diem program on our effective tax rate is significant.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

USA Truck’s business has required, and will continue to require, significant investments. In the Company’s trucking business, where investments are substantial, the primary investments are in new revenue equipment and to a lesser extent, in technology, service centers and working capital. In the Company’s SCS business, where investment is modest, the primary investments are in technology and working capital. USA Truck’s primary sources of liquidity have been funds provided by operations, borrowings under the Company’s line of credit, sales of used revenue equipment and, to a lesser extent, capital and operating leases. Based on expected financial conditions, net capital expenditures, results of operations and related net cash flows and other sources of financing, management believes the Company’s sources of liquidity to be adequate to meet current and projected needs, and the Company does not expect to experience any material liquidity constraints in the foreseeable future.

 

During 2015, the Company generated approximately $60.1 million in cash flows from operations, compared with $51.9 million in 2014 and $35.9 million in 2013. The increase in cash flows from operations resulted primarily from increases in net income in each period, as well as a decrease in accounts receivable during 2015 associated with lower fuel surcharge balances and fewer loads hauled.

 

The Company incurred net capital expenditures of approximately $19 million in 2015, reflecting investments of approximately $66.2 million, primarily in new revenue equipment, less $46.7 million in proceeds of equipment sales (including a sale leaseback). The proceeds of equipment sales were elevated in 2015, compared to other years because of a reduction in the size of the Company’s revenue equipment fleet, and new investments were impacted by leasing a portion of the new equipment under operating leases. On an ongoing basis, net capital expenditures are expected to be higher in future periods absent further increases in the use of operating leases to finance equipment acquisitions. The Company used available cash after net capital expenditures primarily to lower outstanding debt balances by approximately $16.1 million and repurchased approximately 1.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock for $17.9 million.

 

Cash Flows

 

Operating Activities – The $8.2 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily driven by $11.5 million reduction in accounts receivable as the Company reduced its DSO to approximately 38 days during 2015. Additionally, the Company generated $5.4 million more operating income during 2015.

 

During 2014, the Company generated cash flow from operations primarily as a result of generating higher operating income during the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the corresponding period in 2014.

 

Investing Activities – The Company used $20.2 million less cash for investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in cash used was associated with the net reduction of approximately 400 tractors throughout 2015, coupled with the sale of approximately 1,300 trailers which generated significant proceeds for the Company.

 

Increases in net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily reflected a $41.4 million increase in capital expenditures as compared to 2013, offset by $1.1 million in proceeds from the sale of revenue equipment.

 

Financing Activities – The Company used $28.7 million more cash in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in cash used was primarily due to the share repurchase program announced in August 2015 and the balloon payments on capital leases during 2015.

 

 

Cash used in financing activities was reduced during 2014 as compared to 2013, primarily as a result of reinvesting cash generated by operating activities instead of paying down debt. During 2014, the Company made net repayments of long-term debt, financing notes and capital leases of $12.8 million.

 

Debt and Capitalized Lease Obligations

 

See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 6: Long-term Debt” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7: Leases and Commitments” in this Form 10-K for a discussion of the Company’s revolving credit facility and capital lease obligations.

 

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

 

The following table represents USA Truck’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2015.

 

		Payments Due By Period
		Total				Less than 1 year				1-3 years				3-5 years				More than 5 years
Debt (1)		$	71,984			$	1,584			$	--			$	70,400			$	--
Capital lease obligations (2)			32,115				12,800				12,159				7,156				--
Purchase obligations (3)			34,102				34,102				--				--				--
Operating leases – buildings & equipment (4)			35,903				8,700				16,823				8,312				2,068
Total		$	174,104			$	57,186			$	28,982			$	85,868			$	2,068

(1)

Represents revolving line of credit of $70.4 million outstanding plus interest of $1.6 million using a combined interest rate of 2.25%. On February 5, 2015, the Company replaced its revolving credit facility with a new facility, which matures in February 2020. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 6: Long-term Debt” in this Form 10-K for further discussion.

 

(2)

Represents remaining payments on capital lease obligations at December 31, 2015. This figure includes $1.1 million in interest. The borrowings consist of capital leases with financing companies, with fixed borrowing amounts and fixed interest rates, as set forth on each applicable lease schedule. Accordingly, interest on each lease varies between lease schedules.

 

(3)

Represents purchase obligations for revenue equipment and facilities, of which a significant portion is expected be financed with operating cash flows and borrowings under the Credit Facility. The Company generally has the option to cancel tractor orders with 60 to 90 day notice. As of December 31, 2015, 100.0% of this amount had become non-cancelable.

 

(4)

Represents future monthly rental obligations under operating leases for tractors, facilities and computer equipment. Substantially all lease agreements for revenue equipment have fixed payment terms based on the passage of time.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

Operating leases have been an important source of financing for equipment used by operations, office equipment, and certain facilities. As of December 31, 2015, the Company leased certain revenue equipment and information technology hardware under operating leases. Vehicles and hardware held under operating leases are not carried on the consolidated balance sheets, and lease payments, with regard to such vehicles, are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) in the “Equipment rents” expense line item. Equipment rents related to the Company’s revenue equipment operating leases was $4.4 million, $3.0 million and nil for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The total amount of remaining payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2015, was approximately $35.9 million. Other than such operating leases, no other off-balance sheet arrangements have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Inflation

 

Most of the Company’s operating expenses are inflation sensitive, and as such, are not always able to be offset through increases in revenue per mile and cost control efforts. The effect of inflation-driven cost increases on overall operating costs is not expected to be greater for USA Truck than for its competitors, and has been minor over the past three years.

 

 

Fuel Availability and Cost

 

The trucking industry is dependent upon the availability of fuel. In the past, fuel shortages or increases in fuel taxes or fuel costs have adversely affected profitability and may continue to do so. USA Truck has not experienced difficulty in maintaining necessary fuel supplies, and in the past has been able to partially offset increases in fuel costs and fuel taxes through increased freight rates and through a fuel surcharge that increases incrementally as the price of fuel increases above an agreed upon baseline price per gallon. Typically, the Company is not able to fully recover increases in fuel prices through rate increases and fuel surcharges, primarily because those items do not provide any benefit with respect to empty and out-of-route miles, for which the Company generally does not receive compensation from customers. Additionally, most fuel surcharges are based on the average fuel price as published by the DOE for the week prior to the shipment, meaning the Company typically bills customers in the current week based on the previous week’s applicable index. Accordingly, in times of increasing fuel prices, the Company does not recover as much as it is currently paying for fuel. In periods of declining prices, for a short period of time the inverse is true. Overall, the market fuel prices per gallon were approximately 30.4% lower during 2015 than they were during 2014, as reported by the DOE.

 

As of December 31, 2015, the Company did not have any long-term fuel purchase contracts, and has not entered into any fuel hedging arrangements.

 

Equity

 

As of December 31, 2015, USA Truck had stockholders’ equity of $93.8 million and total debt including current maturities of $101.3 million, resulting in a total debt, less cash, to total capitalization ratio of 51.9% compared to 54.2% as of December 31, 2014.

 

Critical Accounting Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. USA Truck bases its assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time its consolidated financial statements are prepared. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could be material.

 

A summary of the significant accounting policies followed in preparation of the Company’s financial statements is contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1: Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of this Form 10-K. The most critical accounting policies and estimates that affect the Company’s financial statements include the following:

 

Estimated useful lives and salvage values for purposes of depreciating tractors and trailers. USA Truck operates a significant number of tractors and trailers in connection with its business. The Company may purchase this equipment or acquire it under leases. Purchased equipment is depreciated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful life down to an estimated salvage or trade-in value. Equipment acquired under capital leases is recorded at the net present value of the minimum lease payments and is amortized on the straight-line method over the lease term. Depreciable lives of tractors and trailers range from three years to ten years. Salvage value is estimated at the expected date of trade-in or sale based on the expected market values of equipment at the time of disposal.

 

Estimates of accrued liabilities for claims involving bodily injury, physical damage losses, employee health benefits and workers’ compensation. The primary claims arising against the Company consist of cargo, liability, personal injury, property damage, workers' compensation, and employee medical expenses. The Company’s insurance programs typically involve self-insurance with high risk-retention levels. Due to its significant self-insured retention amounts, the Company has exposure to fluctuations in the number and severity of claims and to variations between its estimated and actual ultimate payouts. The Company accrues the estimated cost of the uninsured portion of pending claims and an estimate for allocated loss adjustment expenses including legal and other direct costs associated with a claim. Estimates require judgments concerning the nature and severity of the claim, historical trends, advice from third-party administrators and insurers, the size of any potential damage award based on factors such as the specific facts of individual cases, the jurisdictions involved, the prospect of punitive damages, future medical costs, and inflation estimates of future claims development, and the legal and other costs to settle or defend the claims. USA Truck records both current and long-term claims accruals at the estimated ultimate payment amounts based on information such as individual case estimates, historical claims experience and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported. The current portion of the accrual reflects the anticipated claims amounts expected to be paid in the next twelve months. The Company does not discount its claims liabilities.

 

 

Accounting for income taxes. USA Truck’s income tax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits reflect management’s best assessment of estimated current and future taxes to be paid. Given the nature of the transportation business, the Company is subject to tax federally and in a number of state jurisdictions. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining consolidated income tax expense.

 

Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. In evaluating the Company’s ability to recover deferred tax assets in the jurisdiction in which they arise, management considers all positive and negative evidence. Management makes judgments in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes and in determining whether deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The likelihood that all or part of deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income is assessed. To the extent management believes recognition of a deferred tax asset is not more likely than not to be realized, a valuation allowance is established for the amount(s) determined not to be realizable. USA Truck has not recorded a valuation allowance at December 31, 2015, as management believes all deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized.

 

The Company believes its future tax consequences to be adequately provided for based upon current facts and circumstances and current tax law. During the year ended December 31, 2015, management made no material changes in its assumptions regarding the determination of its income tax liabilities. However, should the Company’s tax positions be challenged, different outcomes could result that may have a significant impact on the amounts reported through the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

 

Management periodically reevaluates its accounting policies as circumstances dictate. Together these factors may significantly impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flow from period to period.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1: Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”.

 

Item 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

USA Truck experiences various market risks, including changes in interest rates and commodity prices. The Company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for hedging or speculative purposes. Because USA Truck’s operations are largely confined to the U.S., the Company is not subject to a material amount of foreign currency risk.

 

Interest Rate Risk. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily from its Credit Facility. Its Credit Facility bears variable interest based on the type of borrowing and on the Agent’s prime rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a certain percentage determined based on the Company’s attainment of certain financial ratios. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had $70.4 million outstanding pursuant to its Credit Facility, excluding letters of credit of $4.3 million. Assuming the outstanding balance as of December 31, 2015 remained constant, a hypothetical one-percentage point increase in interest rates applicable to its Credit Facility would increase the Company’s interest expense over a one-year period by approximately $0.7 million.

 

Commodity Price Risk. The Company is subject to commodity price risk with respect to purchases of fuel. In recent years, fuel prices have fluctuated greatly and have generally increased, although recently the Company has seen a significant decrease. In some periods, the Company’s operating performance was adversely affected because it was not able to fully offset the impact of higher diesel fuel prices through increased freight rates and fuel surcharge revenue recoveries. Management cannot predict how fuel price levels will continue to fluctuate in the future or the extent to which fuel surcharge revenue recoveries could be collected to offset any increases. As of December 31, 2015, USA Truck did not have any derivative financial instruments to reduce its exposure to fuel price fluctuations, but may use such instruments in the future. Accordingly, volatile fuel prices may continue to impact the Company significantly. A significant increase in fuel costs, or a shortage of diesel fuel, could materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.  Further, these costs could also exacerbate the driver shortages experienced by the trucking industry by forcing independent contractors to cease operations. Based on the Company’s fuel consumption during 2015, a 10% increase in the average price per gallon would result an approximate $5.9 million increase in fuel expense, before possible increases from fuel surcharge revenues.

 

 

Item 8.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, together with related notes and the report of Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accountants, are set forth on the following pages.

  

 

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

	Page
Audited Financial Statements of USA Truck, Inc.
Report of independent registered public accounting firm	39
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014	41
Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013	42
Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013	43
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013	44
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	45

 

Financial Statement Schedules:

 

All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, are insignificant, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

 

  

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Grant Thornton LLP 2431 E. 61st Street, Suite 500 Tulsa, OK 74136-1208   T 918.877.0800 F 918.877.0805 www.GrantThornton.com

Board of Directors and Stockholders

USA Truck, Inc.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of USA Truck, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of USA Truck, Inc. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted new accounting guidance in 2015 and 2014, related to the presentation of deferred income taxes.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 23, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion.

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

Tulsa, Oklahoma

February 23, 2016

 

 

 

 

1.1 PCAOB financial statement audit report (integrated audit)

June 2015

 

Instructional notes

 

1.	This report, under PCAOB standards, is used when an unmodified opinion on the financial statements is expressed.

 

2.	The report assumes that SEC schedules pursuant to Regulation S-X are not required.

 

3.	Firm policy requires consultation with the NPPD when the audit team concludes that a modified opinion on the financial statements is necessary.

 

4.	For illustrative examples on how to modify the report when the firm is in the second or third year as predecessor auditor, refer to AARM chapter 1.

       

 

  

USA Truck, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

USA Truck, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

  

USA Truck, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

  

USA Truck, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

USA Truck, Inc. 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

 

Item 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

Item 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act and SEC rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Company has established and maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors, misstatements, or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system will be met.  Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

USA Truck has established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to the officers who certify the Company’s financial reports and to other members of senior management and the board of directors. USA Truck management, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, as of December 31, 2015, USA Truck’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at a reasonable assurance level to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

The management of USA Truck is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

1.

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of Company assets;

 

2.

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and directors; and

 

3.

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of Company assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting was conducted based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on management’s evaluation under the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2015.

 

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, has been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accountants, as attested to in their attestation report included herein.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

No changes occurred in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2015, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

  

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Grant Thornton LLP 2431 E. 61st Street, Suite 500 Tulsa, OK 74136-1208   T 918.877.0800 F 918.877.0805 www.GrantThornton.com

Board of Directors and Stockholders

USA Truck, Inc.

 

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of USA Truck, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, and our report dated February 23, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

Tulsa, Oklahoma

February 23, 2016

 

  

  

Item 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

 

There is no information that the Company is required to report, but did not report, on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2015.

 

PART III

 

Item 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

The information required in this Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference to the information responsive to this Item contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC.

 

Item 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The information required in this Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference to the information responsive to this Item contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC.

 

Item 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The information required in this Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference to the information responsive to this Item contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC.

 

Item 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

The information required in this Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference to the information responsive to this Item contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC.

 

Item 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

 

The information required in this Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference to the information responsive to this Item contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC.

  

  

PART IV

 

Item 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

			(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report:				Page
		1.	Financial statements.
			The following financial statements of the Company are included in Part II, Item 8 of this report:
			Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014				41
			Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013				42
			Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013				43
			Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013				44
			Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements				45
		2.	Schedules have been omitted since the required information is not applicable or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
		3.	Listing of exhibits.
			The exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed under paragraph (b) below and on the Exhibit Index appearing at the end of this report. Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements are indicated by an asterisk.
			(b) Exhibits

 

Exhibit Number				Exhibit
3.01				Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as currently in effect, including all Certificates of Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
3.02				Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
4.01				Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as currently in effect, including all Certificates of Amendment thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
4.02				Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
10.01*				Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009).
10.02*				Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
10.03*				Employment Agreement dated February 11, 2013, by and between the Company and John M. Simone (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
10.04*				Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
10.05*				USA Truck, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Schedule 14A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission April 25, 2014).
10.06				Loan and Security Agreement, dated February 5, 2015, among the Company, Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, and SunTrust Bank, as Syndication Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)
10.07				Cooperation Agreement, dated as of February 25, 2015, by and among USA Truck, Inc., Baker Street Capital L.P., Baker Street Capital Management, LLC, Baker Street Capital GP, LLC, and Vadim Perelman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2015)
10.08				Cooperation Agreement, dated as of February 25, 2015, by and among USA Truck, Inc., Stone House Capital Management, LLC, SH Capital Partners, L.P., and Mark Cohen (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2015)
10.09*				Consulting Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2015, by and between the Company and Thomas M. Glaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015)
10.10*				Separation Agreement, dated July 7, 2015, by and between the Company and John M. Simone (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015)
10.11*				Employment Agreement, dated July 29, 2015, by and between the Company and Michael K. Borrows (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015)
10.12*				Employment Agreement, dated July 29, 2015, by and between the Company and Russell A. Overla (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015)

  

 

10.13*				Separation Agreement, dated September 15, 2015, by and between the Company and Jeffrey H. Lester (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015)
10.14*				Separation Agreement, dated September 24, 2015, by and between the Company and Russell A. Overla (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015)
10.15*				Employment Agreement, dated September 30, 2015, by and between the Company and Martin Tewari (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015)
10.16*			#	Form of Restricted Stock Award Notice
10.17*			#	2015 Management Bonus Plan – Chief Executive Officer
10.18*			#	2015 Management Bonus Plan – Named Executive Officers
10.19*			#	Form of Executive Severance and Change in Control Agreement
10.20*				Amendment to Cooperation Agreement, dated as of May 5, 2015, by and among USA Truck, Inc., Stone House Capital Management, LLC, SH Capital Partners, L.P., and Mark Cohen (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)
10.21*				Amendment to Cooperation Agreement, dated as of May 5, 2015, by and among USA Truck, Inc., Baker Street Capital L.P., Baker Street Capital Management, LLC, Baker Street Capital GP, LLC, and Vadim Perelman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015)
21				The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is omitted as it does not constitute a significant subsidiary as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
23.01			#	Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.01			#	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.02			#	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.01			#	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.02			#	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS			±	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH			±	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL			±	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF			±	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB			±	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE			±	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

* Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
# Filed herewith.
±In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Form 10-K shall be deemed to be “furnished” and not “filed.”

 

  

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

USA TRUCK, INC.

 

(Registrant)

 

By:	/s/ John R. Rogers
	John R. Rogers
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:	February 23, 2016

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature		Title		Date
/s/ Robert A. Peiser
Robert A. Peiser		Chairman of the Board and Director		February 23, 2016
/s/ John R. Rogers
John R. Rogers		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director		February 23, 2016
		(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Michael K. Borrows
Michael K. Borrows		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		February 23, 2016
		(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Joseph M. Kaiser
Joseph M. Kaiser		Vice President and Corporate Controller		February 23, 2016
		(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Thomas Glaser
Thomas Glaser		Director		February 23, 2016
/s/ William H. Hanna
William H. Hanna		Director		February 23, 2016
/s/ James D. Simpson, III
James D. Simpson, III		Director		February 23, 2016
/s/ Richard B. Beauchamp
Richard B. Beauchamp		Director		February 23, 2016
/s/ Robert E. Creager
Robert E. Creager		Director		February 23, 2016
/s/ Alexander D. Greene
Alexander D. Greene		Director		February 23, 2016
/s/ Gary R. Enzor
Gary R. Enzor		Director		February 23, 2016
/s/ Barbara J. Faulkenberry
Barbara J. Faulkenberry		Director		February 23, 2016

 

 

63