HPP 2011.9.30 10Q
Table of Contents

 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________________________
FORM 10-Q
______________________________________
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from ______ to ______
Commission File Number 001-34789
______________________________________
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
______________________________________
Maryland
 
27-1430478
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
11601 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1600
Los Angeles, California
 
90025
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(310) 445-5700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and
former fiscal year if changed since last report)
______________________________________ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x   No  o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
 
o
Accelerated filer
 
o
Non-accelerated filer
 
x
Smaller reporting company
 
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o    No  x.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding at November 1, 2011 was 33,576,863.
 
 
 
 
 

Table of Contents

Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 2.
 
 
 
ITEM 3.
 
 
 
ITEM 4.
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 1.
 
 
 
ITEM 1A.
 
 
 
ITEM 2.
 
 
 
ITEM 6.
 
 


2

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

HUDSON PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
 
 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
ASSETS
 
 
 
REAL ESTATE ASSETS
 
 
 
Land
$
349,783

 
$
329,231

Building and improvements
529,375

 
468,711

Tenant improvements
59,657

 
47,478

Furniture and fixtures
11,475

 
11,411

Property under development
8,218

 
7,904

Total real estate held for investment
958,508

 
864,735

Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(46,235
)
 
(27,113
)
Investment in real estate, net
912,273

 
837,622

Cash and cash equivalents
20,715

 
48,875

Restricted cash
9,624

 
4,121

Accounts receivable, net
10,758

 
4,478

Straight-line rent receivables
8,950

 
6,703

Deferred leasing costs and lease intangibles, net
78,943

 
86,385

Deferred finance costs, net
4,892

 
3,211

Interest rate contracts
202

 

Goodwill
8,754

 
8,754

Prepaid expenses and other assets
9,239

 
4,416

TOTAL ASSETS
$
1,064,350

 
1,004,565

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
Notes payable
$
298,672

 
$
342,060

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
18,753

 
11,507

Below-market leases
19,293

 
20,983

Security deposits
5,703

 
5,052

Prepaid rent
12,470

 
10,559

Interest rate contracts

 
71

TOTAL LIABILITIES
354,891

 
390,232

6.25% series A cumulative redeemable preferred units of the Operating Partnership
12,475

 
12,475

Redeemable non-controlling interest in consolidated real estate entity

 
40,328

EQUITY
 
 
 
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 authorized; 8.375% series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock, $25.00 liquidation preference, 3,500,000 shares outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
87,500

 
87,500

Common Stock, $0.01 par value 490,000,000 authorized, 33,572,454 outstanding at September 30, 2011 and 22,436,950 outstanding at December 31, 2010, respectively
336

 
224

Additional paid-in capital
556,650

 
411,598

Accumulated other comprehensive (deficit) income
(847
)
 
6

Accumulated deficit
(10,588
)
 
(3,482
)
Total Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. stockholders’ equity
633,051

 
495,846

Non-controlling common units in the Operating Partnership
63,933

 
65,684

TOTAL EQUITY
696,984

 
561,530

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$
1,064,350

 
1,004,565

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

HUDSON PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental
$
18,950

 
$
6,521

 
$
54,285

 
$
12,786

Tenant recoveries
7,437

 
1,001

 
19,584

 
1,915

Other
349

 
97

 
2,535

 
125

Total office revenues
26,736

 
7,619

 
76,404

 
14,826

Media & entertainment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental
5,188

 
5,246

 
16,260

 
15,453

Tenant recoveries
402

 
363

 
1,261

 
1,179

Other property-related revenue
4,579

 
4,194

 
11,092

 
7,996

Other
12

 
83

 
111

 
96

     Total media & entertainment revenues
10,181

 
9,886

 
28,724

 
24,724

Total revenues
36,917

 
17,505

 
105,128

 
39,550

Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office operating expenses
12,785

 
2,822

 
32,592

 
5,650

Media & entertainment operating expenses
6,123

 
5,959

 
17,073

 
15,194

General and administrative
2,844

 
2,379

 
9,052

 
2,379

Depreciation and amortization
11,036

 
4,317

 
33,023

 
9,985

Total operating expenses
32,788

 
15,477

 
91,740

 
33,208

Income from operations
4,129

 
2,028

 
13,388

 
6,342

Other expense (income)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
4,073

 
1,784

 
13,245

 
6,196

Interest income
(36
)
 
(31
)
 
(67
)
 
(37
)
Unrealized (gain) on interest rate contracts

 

 

 
(347
)
Acquisition-related expenses
762

 
256

 
762

 
2,689

Other expenses (income)
133

 
(8
)
 
368

 
(8
)
 
4,932

 
2,001

 
14,308

 
8,493

Net (loss) income
(803
)
 
27

 
(920
)
 
(2,151
)
Less: Net income attributable to preferred stock and units
(2,027
)
 
(195
)
 
(6,081
)
 
(199
)
Less: Net income attributable to restricted shares
(53
)
 
(25
)
 
(177
)
 
(25
)
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interest in consolidated real estate entities

 

 
(803
)
 
32

Add: Net loss attributable to common units in the Operating Partnership
211

 
21

 
698

 
277

Net loss attributable to Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. shareholders’ / controlling members’ equity
$
(2,672
)
 
$
(172
)
 
$
(7,283
)
 
$
(2,066
)
Net loss attributable to shareholders’ per share - basic and diluted
$
(0.08
)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0.26
)
 
 
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding - basic and diluted
33,146,334

 
21,946,508

 
28,126,546

 
 
Dividends declared per common share
0.1250

 
0.0971

 
0.3750

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


4

Table of Contents

HUDSON PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands) 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(920
)
 
$
(2,151
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
33,023

 
9,985

Amortization of deferred financing costs and loan premium, net
747

 
1,013

Amortization of stock based compensation
2,004

 
375

Straight-line rent receivables
(2,247
)
 
(2,810
)
Amortization of above-market leases
2,482

 
597

Amortization of below-market leases
(2,847
)
 
(788
)
Amortization of lease incentive costs
384

 

Bad debt expense
865

 

Amortization of ground lease
204

 
15

Unrealized gain on interest rate contract

 
(347
)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Restricted cash
(5,503
)
 
2,014

Accounts receivable
(7,145
)
 
(1,853
)
Deferred leasing costs and lease intangibles
(2,867
)
 
(1,363
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(1,954
)
 
(285
)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
9,299

 
857

Security deposits
651

 
753

Prepaid rent
1,911

 
(2,591
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
28,087

 
3,421

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Additions to investment property
(10,147
)
 
(7,479
)
Property acquisitions
(57,162
)
 
(49,188
)
Deposits for property acquisitions
(3,085
)
 

Net cash used in investing activities
(70,394
)
 
(56,667
)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Proceeds from notes payable
277,500

 
5,671

Payments of notes payable
(354,521
)
 
(158,189
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
111,008

 
232,721

Proceeds from private placement of common stock
45,688

 
20,000

Series B stock issuance transaction costs
(600
)
 

Common stock issuance transaction costs
(1,283
)
 
(6,935
)
Dividends paid to common stock and unit holders
(12,179
)
 

Dividends paid to preferred stock and unit holders
(6,081
)
 

Contributions by members

 
3,653

Distribution to members
(93
)
 
(1,624
)
Acquisition of non-controlling interest in consolidated real estate entity
(41,131
)
 
(828
)
Payment of loan costs
(4,161
)
 
(2,938
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
14,147

 
91,531

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(28,160
)
 
38,285

Cash and cash equivalents-beginning of period
48,875

 
3,694

Cash and cash equivalents-end of period
$
20,715

 
$
41,979

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized
$
12,527

 
$
5,482

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities for investment in property
$
1,701

 
$

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities for distributions to members
$
359

 
$

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)

1. Organization

Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (which is referred to in these financial statements as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a Maryland corporation formed on November 9, 2009 that did not have any meaningful operating activity until the consummation of our initial public offering and the related acquisition of our predecessor and certain other entities in June 2010.

We combined with our predecessor and Howard Street Associates LLC and acquired certain other entities simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering on June 29, 2010 (“IPO”). On June 29, 2010, we completed the following formation transactions:

In our IPO we issued a total of 14,720,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for gross proceeds of approximately $250.2 million in cash.

In a concurrent private placement, we issued a total of 1,176,471 shares of our common stock in exchange for gross proceeds of $20.0 million in cash.

In our formation transactions, we acquired certain assets of our predecessor and other entities in exchange for the assumption or discharge of $246.3 million in indebtedness, the payment of $7.2 million in cash, and the issuance of 2,610,941 common units of partnership interest in our operating partnership, 499,014 series A preferred units of partnership interest in our operating partnership and 6,050,037 shares of our common stock.

We entered into a $200.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, with an accordion feature to increase the availability to $250.0 million under specified circumstances.

As indicated above, because the IPO and related formation transactions did not occur until shortly before June 30, 2010, the results of operations for the entities acquired in connection with the IPO and related formation transactions are only included in certain historical financial statements. More particularly, the results of operations discussed below for the three months ended September 30, 2010 reflect the operations of the (a) three office properties and two media and entertainment properties owned by HFOP City Plaza, LLC, Sunset Bronson Entertainment Properties, LLC, SGS Realty II, LLC, and Howard Street Associates LLC, as applicable (the “Predecessor Properties”), and (b) two office properties and certain management contracts owned by Glenborough Tierrasanta, LLC, GLB Encino, LLC and Hudson Capital, LLC, as applicable, which were acquired on June 29, 2010 (the “IPO Acquisitions”). The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, reflect the operations of the Predecessor Properties for that entire period, and the results of operations for the IPO Acquisitions from the date of their acquisition. The results of operations for properties acquired after the IPO are similarly included in our consolidated statements of operations from the date of each such acquisition.
 
We have determined that one of the entities comprising our predecessor, SGS Realty II, LLC, was the acquirer for accounting purposes in our formation transactions that occurred in connection with our IPO. In addition, we have concluded that any interests contributed by the controlling member of the other entities comprising our predecessor and Howard Street Associates, LLC in connection with our IPO was a transaction between entities under common control. As a result, the contribution of interests in each of these entities has been recorded at historical cost. The consideration we paid in connection with the contribution of the ownership of these entities to us is described in the third bullet point appearing above.

Since the completion of the IPO, the concurrent private placement, and the related formation transactions that occurred on June 29, 2010, we have been a fully integrated, self-administered, and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Through our controlling interest in Hudson Pacific Properties, L.P. (our “Operating Partnership”) and its subsidiaries, we own, manage, lease, acquire and develop real estate, consisting primarily of office and media and entertainment properties. As of September 30, 2011, we owned a portfolio of 14 office properties and two media and entertainment properties. All of these properties are located in California.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation


6

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


The accompanying consolidated/combined financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The effect of all significant intercompany balances and transactions has been eliminated. The real estate entities included in the accompanying consolidated/combined financial statements have been consolidated/combined on the basis that, for the periods prior to the completion of our IPO, such entities were under common control and are therefore reported at the historical cost of the predecessor entities.

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States may have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make their presentation not misleading. The accompanying unaudited financial statements include, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial information set forth therein. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2011. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the notes thereto. Any reference to the number of properties and square footage are unaudited and outside the scope of our independent registered public accounting firm’s review of our financial statements in accordance with the standards of the United States Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of commitments and contingencies at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to acquiring, developing and assessing the carrying values of its real estate properties, its accrued liabilities, its performance-based equity compensation awards, and its qualification as a REIT. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, current market conditions, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates.

Investment in Real Estate Properties

The properties are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Company allocates the cost of an acquisition, including the assumption of liabilities, to the acquired tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values in accordance with GAAP. The Company assesses fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize discount and/or capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions. The fair value of tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it was vacant.

Acquisition-related expenses associated with acquisition of operating properties are expensed in the period incurred.

The Company records acquired “above and below” market leases at fair value using discount rates that reflect the risks associated with the leases acquired. The amount recorded is based on the present value of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the extended term for any leases with below-market renewal options. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values that are based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes estimates of lost rents at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which are dependent on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, the Company considers leasing commissions, legal and other related costs.

The Company capitalizes direct construction and development costs, including predevelopment costs, interest, property taxes, insurance and other costs directly related and essential to the acquisition, development or construction of a real estate project. Construction and development costs are capitalized while substantial activities are ongoing to prepare an asset for its intended use. The Company considers a construction project as substantially complete and held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year after cessation of major construction activity. Costs incurred after a project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, or after development activities have ceased, are expensed as incurred. Costs previously capitalized related to abandoned acquisitions or developments are charged to earnings.

7

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

The Company computes depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of a range of 39 years for building and improvements, 15 years for land improvements, 5 or 7 years for furniture and fixtures and equipment, and over the shorter of asset life or life of the lease for tenant improvements. Depreciation is discontinued when a property is identified as held for sale. Above- and below-market lease intangibles are amortized to revenue over the remaining non-cancellable lease terms and bargain renewal periods, if any. Other in-place lease intangibles are amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancellable lease term and bargain renewal periods, if any.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company assesses the carrying value of real estate assets and related intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable in accordance with GAAP. Impairment losses are recorded on real estate assets held for investment when indicators of impairment are present and the future undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount. The Company recognizes impairment losses to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the properties. Properties held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less cost to sell. The Company did not record any impairment charges related to its real estate assets and related intangibles during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. There are no properties held for sale at September 30, 2011 or 2010.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in business combinations. Our goodwill balance as of September 30, 2011 is $8,754. We do not amortize this asset but instead analyze it on an annual basis for impairment. No impairments have been noted for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash on hand and in banks plus all short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased.

The Company maintains some of its cash in bank deposit accounts that, at times, may exceed the federally insured limit. No losses have been experienced related to such accounts.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of amounts held by lenders to provide for future real estate taxes and insurance expenditures, repairs and capital improvements reserves, general and other reserves and security deposits.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable consist of amounts due for monthly rents and other charges. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from tenant defaults or the inability of tenants to make contractual rent and tenant recovery payments. The Company monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants and operators on an ongoing basis. This evaluation considers industry and economic conditions, property performance, credit enhancements and other factors. For straight-line rent amounts, the Company’s assessment is based on amounts estimated to be recoverable over the term of the lease. At September 30, 2011, management believes that the collectability of straight-line rent balances are reasonably assured; accordingly, no allowance was established against straight-line rent receivables. The Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on specific identification of uncollectible accounts and the Company’s historical collection experience. The Company recognizes an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, the current business environment and the Company’s historical experience. Historical experience has been within management’s expectations.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes rental revenue from tenants on a straight-line basis over the lease term when collectability is reasonably assured and the tenant has taken possession or controls the physical use of the leased asset. If the lease provides for

8

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


tenant improvements, the Company determines whether the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, are owned by the tenant or the Company. When the Company is the owner of the tenant improvements, the tenant is not considered to have taken physical possession or have control of the physical use of the leased asset until the tenant improvements are substantially completed. When the tenant is the owner of the tenant improvements, any tenant improvement allowance that is funded is treated as a lease incentive and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the lease term. Tenant improvement ownership is determined based on various factors including, but not limited to:

whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent;

whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements at the end of the lease term;

whether the tenant improvements are unique to the tenant or general-purpose in nature; and

whether the tenant improvements are expected to have any residual value at the end of the lease.

Certain leases provide for additional rents contingent upon a percentage of the tenant’s revenue in excess of specified base amounts or other thresholds. Such revenue is recognized when actual results reported by the tenant, or estimates of tenant results, exceed the base amount or other thresholds. Such revenue is recognized only after the contingency has been removed (when the related thresholds are achieved), which may result in the recognition of rental revenue in periods subsequent to when such payments are received.

Other property-related revenue is revenue that is derived from the tenants’ use of lighting, equipment rental, parking, power, HVAC and telecommunications (phone and internet). Other property-related revenue is recognized when these items are provided.

Tenant recoveries related to reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented gross, as the Company is generally the primary obligor with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, has discretion in selecting the supplier and bears the associated credit risk.

The Company recognizes gains on sales of properties upon the closing of the transaction with the purchaser. Gains on properties sold are recognized using the full accrual method when (i) the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured, (ii) the Company is not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale, (iii) the initial investment from the buyer is sufficient and (iv) other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. Gains on sales of properties may be deferred in whole or in part until the requirements for gain recognition have been met.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are amortized over the term of the respective loan.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company manages interest rate risk associated with borrowings by entering into interest rate derivative contracts. The Company recognizes all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges are adjusted to fair value and the changes in fair value are reflected as income or expense. If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives are either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive income, which is a component of equity. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

The Company held two interest rate contracts as of September 30, 2011, which have been accounted for as cash flow hedges as more fully described in footnote 6 below. The Company held one interest rate swap at December 31, 2010, which has been accounted for as a cash flow hedge as more fully described in footnote 6 below.

Stock Based Compensation

Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (referred to as ASC Topic 718 and formerly known as FASB 123R), requires us to recognize an expense for the fair value of equity-based compensation awards. Grants of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units under our equity incentive award

9

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


plans are accounted for under ASC Topic 718. Our compensation committee will regularly consider the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to our equity incentive award plans and programs.

Income Taxes

Our taxable income prior to the completion of our IPO is reportable by the members of the limited liability companies that comprise our predecessor. Our property-owning subsidiaries are limited liability companies and are treated as pass-through entities for income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the activities of these entities.

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) commencing with our initial taxable year. To qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders and meet the various other requirements imposed by the Code relating to such matters as operating results, asset holdings, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership. Provided we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we are generally not subject to corporate level income tax on the earnings distributed currently to our stockholders that we derive from our REIT qualifying activities. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and are unable to avail ourselves of certain savings provisions set forth in the Code, all of our taxable income would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax.

We have elected, together with one of our subsidiaries, to be treated such subsidiary as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) for federal income tax purposes. Certain activities that we undertake must be conducted by a TRS, such as non-customary services for our tenants, and holding assets that we cannot hold directly. A TRS is subject to federal and state income taxes.

The Company is subject to the statutory requirements of the state in which it conducts business.

The Company periodically evaluates it tax positions to evaluate whether it is more likely than not that such positions would be sustained upon examination by a tax authority for all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations, based on their technical merits. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has not established a liability for uncertain tax positions.

Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Under GAAP, the Company is required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, the Company is required to measure other financial instruments and balances at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate and long-lived assets). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

When available, the Company utilizes quoted market prices from an independent third-party source to determine fair value and classifies such items in Level 1 or Level 2. In instances where the market for a financial instrument is not active, regardless of the availability of a nonbinding quoted market price, observable inputs might not be relevant and could require the Company to make a significant adjustment to derive a fair value measurement. Additionally, in an inactive market, a market price quoted from an independent third party may rely more on models with inputs based on information available only to that independent third party. When the Company determines the market for a financial instrument owned by the Company to be illiquid or when market transactions for similar instruments do not appear orderly, the Company uses several valuation sources (including internal valuations, discounted cash flow analysis and quoted market prices) and establishes a fair value by assigning

10

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


weights to the various valuation sources.

Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. In this regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The Company considers the following factors to be indicators of an inactive market: (i) there are few recent transactions, (ii) price quotations are not based on current information, (iii) price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers (for example, some brokered markets), (iv) indexes that previously were highly correlated with the fair values of the asset or liability are demonstrably uncorrelated with recent indications of fair value for that asset or liability, (v) there is a significant increase in implied liquidity risk premiums, yields, or performance indicators (such as delinquency rates or loss severities) for observed transactions or quoted prices when compared with the Company’s estimate of expected cash flows, considering all available market data about credit and other nonperformance risk for the asset or liability, (vi) there is a wide bid-ask spread or significant increase in the bid-ask spread, (vii) there is a significant decline or absence of a market for new issuances (that is, a primary market) for the asset or liability or similar assets or liabilities, and (viii) little information is released publicly (for example, a principal-to-principal market).

The Company considers the following factors to be indicators of non-orderly transactions: (i) there was not adequate exposure to the market for a period before the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets or liabilities under current market conditions, (ii) there was a usual and customary marketing period, but the seller marketed the asset or liability to a single market participant, (iii) the seller is in or near bankruptcy or receivership (that is, distressed), or the seller was required to sell to meet regulatory or legal requirements (that is, forced), and (iv) the transaction price is an outlier when compared with other recent transactions for the same or similar assets or liabilities.

In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820), Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This update provides amendments to the ASC for the fair value measurement of liabilities. In circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, the reporting entity is required to measure fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets, or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach. The amendments in this update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. These amendments to the ASC are effective upon issuance and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

The Company’s interest rate contract agreements are classified as Level 2 and their fair value is derived from estimated values obtained from observable market data for similar instruments.

Unrealized losses associated with Level 2 assets were $429 and $998 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Unrealized gains associated with Level 2 liabilities were $0 and $71 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The unrealized losses and gains associated with Level 2 assets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 relate to interest rate contracts that have been accounted for as a cash flow hedges, therefore changes in the fair value of those derivatives are recognized in other comprehensive income, which is a component of equity.

Unrealized losses associated with Level 2 liabilities was $34 for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Unrealized gains associated with Level 2 liabilities was $347 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The unrealized loss associated with Level 2 liabilities for the three months ended September 30, 2010 relates to an interest rate swap which had been accounted for as a cash flow hedge, therefore changes in the fair value of that derivative are recognized in other comprehensive income, which is a component of equity.

Recently Issued Accounting Literature

Changes to GAAP are established by the FASB in the form of ASUs. We consider the applicability and impact of all ASUs. Recently issued ASUs not listed below are expected to not have any material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations, because either the ASU is not applicable or the impact is expected to be immaterial.


11

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This ASU requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, which for us means the first quarter of 2012. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations as it only affects presentation.

In September 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that gives an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. This guidance will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, which will be the Company's fiscal year 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of the guidance will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.


3. Investment in Real Estate
We acquired GLB Encino, LLC, Glenborough Tierrasanta, LLC, and Hudson Capital, LLC as part of the formation transactions in connection with our IPO for approximately $89.0 million. The results of operations for each of the acquired entities are included in our consolidated statements of operations beginning June 29, 2010. The following table represents our purchase price allocation for these acquisitions.
 
 
GLB Encino,
LLC and
Glenborough
Tierrasanta,
LLC
 
Hudson
Capital,
LLC
 
 
Date of Acquisition
June 29, 2010

 
June 29, 2010

 
Total
Consideration paid
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of common shares or common operating partnership units
$
3,019

 
$
9,000

 
$
12,019

Issuance of preferred operating partnership units
12,475

 

 
12,475

Cash consideration
7,200

 

 
7,200

Debt assumed
57,300

 

 
57,300

Total consideration paid
$
79,994

 
$
9,000

 
$
88,994

Allocation of consideration paid
 
 
 
 
 
Investment in real estate, net
$
72,978

 
$
255

 
$
73,233

Lease intangibles, net
6,570

 

 
6,570

Goodwill

 
8,754

 
8,754

Leasing costs
1,940

 
 
 
1,940

Fair market favorable debt value
280

 
 
 
280

Below-market leases
(1,062
)
 
 
 
(1,062
)
Cash

 
23

 
23

Other liabilities assumed, net
(712
)
 
(32
)
 
(744
)
Total consideration paid
$
79,994

 
$
9,000

 
$
88,994


During 2010, we acquired the Del Amo Office property, the 9300 Wilshire Boulevard office building, the 222 Kearny Street property, the Rincon Center joint venture interest, the 1455 Market property and the 10950 Washington Boulevard property. The results of operations for each of these acquisitions are included in our consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition. The following table represents our purchase price allocation for these acquisitions.


12

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


 
Del Amo
 
9300 Wilshire
 
222 Kearny
 
Rincon Center (1)
 
1455 Market
 
10950 Washington
 
 
Date of Acquisition
August 13, 2010
 
August 24, 2010
 
October 8, 2010
 
December 16, 2010
 
December 16, 2010
 
December 22, 2010
 
Total
Consideration paid
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash consideration
$
27,327

 
$
14,684

 
$
34,174

 
$
38,391

 
$
92,365

 
$
16,409

 
$
223,350

Redeemable Non-controlling Interest in Consolidated Real Estate Entity

 

 

 
40,180

 

 

 
40,180

Debt Assumed

 

 

 
106,000

 

 
30,000

 
136,000

Total consideration
$
27,327

 
$
14,684

 
$
34,174

 
$
184,571

 
$
92,365

 
$
46,409

 
$
399,530

Allocation of consideration paid
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment in real estate, net
18,000

 
10,718

 
31,356

 
168,906

 
76,216

 
43,089

 
348,285

Above-market leases
2,626

 
689

 
1,296

 
3,693

 
903

 
1,160

 
10,367

Leases in-place
2,118

 
677

 
1,942

 
10,935

 
13,471

 
2,417

 
31,560

Other lease intangibles
558

 
198

 
491

 
3,692

 
8,212

 
765

 
13,916

Fair market unfavorable debt value

 

 

 
(650
)
 

 
(230
)
 
(880
)
Below-market ground lease
4,198

 
2,822

 
494

 

 

 

 
7,514

Below-market leases

 
(104
)
 
(691
)
 
(1,576
)
 
(5,899
)
 
(1,201
)
 
(9,471
)
Other (liabilities) asset assumed, net
(173
)
 
(316
)
 
(714
)
 
(429
)
 
(538
)
 
409

 
(1,761
)
Total consideration paid
$
27,327

 
$
14,684

 
$
34,174

 
$
184,571

 
$
92,365

 
$
46,409

 
$
399,530

(1) We acquired a 51% joint venture interest in the Rincon Center property on December 16, 2010. On April 29, 2011 we acquired the remaining 49% interest in the Rincon Center property for approximately $38.7 million (before closing costs and prorations).


During 2011, we acquired the 604 Arizona property, the 275 Brannan property and the 625 Second street property. The results of operations for each of these acquisitions are included in our consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition. The following table represents our purchase price allocation for these acquisitions.
 
 
604 Arizona
 
275 Brannan
 
625 Second Street
 
 
Date of Acquisition
July 26, 2011
 
August 19, 2011
 
September 1, 2011
 
Total
Consideration paid
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash consideration
$
21,373

 
$
12,370

 
$
23,419

 
$
57,162

Debt Assumed

 

 
33,700

 
33,700

Total consideration
$
21,373

 
$
12,370

 
$
57,119

 
$
90,862

Allocation of consideration paid
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment in real estate, net
20,366

 
12,250

 
53,394

 
86,010

Above-market leases

 

 
465

 
465

Leases in-place
1,121

 

 
2,799

 
3,920

Other lease intangibles
117

 

 
1,286

 
1,403

Fair market unfavorable debt value

 

 
(490
)
 
(490
)
Below-market leases
(104
)
 

 
(1,054
)
 
(1,158
)
Other (liabilities) asset assumed, net
(127
)
 
120

 
719

 
712

Total consideration paid
$
21,373

 
$
12,370

 
$
57,119

 
$
90,862


 The table below shows the pro forma financial information (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 as if all properties had been acquired as of January 1, 2010.
 

13

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
2010
Total revenues
$
110,050

$
102,198

Net loss
$
3

$
(1,907
)
 
4. Lease Intangibles
The following summarizes our deferred leasing cost and lease intangibles as of:
 
 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
Above-market leases
$
16,177

 
$
15,755

Lease in-place
49,109

 
45,658

Below-market ground leases
7,513

 
7,513

Other lease intangibles
27,181

 
25,903

Lease commissions
642

 
957

Deferred leasing costs
6,821

 
4,154

 
107,443

 
99,940

Accumulated amortization
(28,500
)
 
(13,555
)
Deferred leasing costs and lease intangibles, net
$
78,943

 
$
86,385

 
 
 
 
Below-market leases
25,736

 
24,702

Accumulated accretion
(6,443
)
 
(3,719
)
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net
$
19,293

 
20,983

 
 
 
 

5. Notes Payable

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility

In conjunction with our IPO and formation transactions, we entered into a $200.0 million secured revolving credit facility with a group of lenders for which an affiliate of Barclays Capital Inc. acts as administrative agent and joint lead arranger and affiliates of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated act as syndication agent and joint lead arranger. Until it was amended on April 4, 2011, the credit facility bore interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 325 basis points to 400 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.50%. On April 4, 2011, we amended this facility as described more fully in this footnote below.

The amount available for us to borrow under the facility is subject to the lesser of a percentage of the appraisal value of our properties that form the borrowing base of the facility and a minimum implied debt service coverage ratio. As a result of the April 4, 2011 amendment, the secured revolving credit facility now bears interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 250 basis points to 325 basis points (down from 325 basis points to 400 basis points), depending on our leverage ratio, and is no longer subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.50%. The secured revolving credit facility continues to include an accordion feature that allows us to increase the availability by $50.0 million, to $250.0 million, under specified circumstances. Our ability to borrow under the facility is subject to continued compliance with a number of customary restrictive covenants, including:

a maximum leverage ratio (defined as consolidated total indebtedness to total asset value) of 0.60:1.00;
a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (defined as consolidated earnings before interest, taxes; depreciation and amortization to consolidated fixed charges) of 1.75:1.00;
a maximum consolidated floating rate debt ratio (defined as consolidated floating rate indebtedness to total asset value) of 0.25:1.00;
a maximum recourse debt ratio (defined as recourse indebtedness other than indebtedness under the revolving credit facility but including unsecured lines of credit to total asset value) of 0.15:1.00; and
a minimum tangible net worth equal to at least 85% of our tangible net worth at the closing of our IPO plus 75% of the

14

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


net proceeds of any additional equity issuances.

At September 30, 2011, we are in compliance with these covenants. As of September 30, 2011, we had approximately $141.2 million of total capacity under our credit facility, of which $33.0 million had been drawn.

The following table sets forth information as of September 30, 2011 with respect to our outstanding indebtedness. The $37.0 million note outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and secured by the Sunset Bronson property summarized below was repaid from proceeds of the $92.0 million note secured by Sunset Gower / Sunset Bronson properties as described in (2) below. The $106.0 million note outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and secured by the Rincon Center property summarized below was repaid from proceeds of the $110.0 million note secured by Rincon Center property as described in (3) below.
 
Debt
Outstanding
September 30,
2011

 
Outstanding
December  31,
2010

 
Interest Rate (1)
 
Maturity
Date
Mortgage loan secured by Sunset Bronson (2)
$

 
$
37,000

 
LIBOR+3.65%
 
4/30/2011
Mortgage loan secured by Rincon Center (3)

 
106,000

 
6.08%
 
7/1/2011
Mortgage loan secured by First Financial (4)

 
43,000

 
5.34%
 
12/1/2011
Mortgage loan secured by Tierrasanta (5)

 
14,300

 
5.62%
 
12/1/2011
Mortgage loan secured by 10950 Washington
30,000

 
30,000

 
5.94%
 
2/11/2012
Secured Revolving Credit Facility
33,000

 
111,117

 
LIBOR+2.50% to 3.25%
 
6/29/2013
Mortgage loan secured by 625 Second Street (6)
33,700

 

 
5.85%
 
2/1/2014
Mortgage loan secured by Sunset Gower/Sunset Bronson (2)
92,000

 

 
LIBOR+3.50%
 
2/11/2016
Mortgage loan secured by Rincon Center (3)
109,397

 

 
5.13%
 
5/1/2018
Subtotal
$
298,097

 
$
341,417

 
 
 
 
Unamortized loan premium, net (7)
575

 
643

 
 
 
 
Total
$
298,672

 
$
342,060

 
 
 
 
__________________ 

(1)
Interest rate with respect to indebtedness is calculated on the basis of a 360-day year for the actual days elapsed, excluding the amortization of loan fees and costs.
(2)
On February 11, 2011, we closed a five-year term loan totaling $92.0 million with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., secured by our Sunset Gower and Sunset Bronson media and entertainment properties. The loan bears interest at a rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. $37.0 million of the loan was subject to an interest rate contract, which swaps one-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 0.75% through April 30, 2011. On March 16, 2011, we purchased an interest rate cap in order to cap one-month LIBOR at 3.715% with respect to $50.0 million of the loan through its maturity on February 11, 2016. Proceeds from the loan were used to fully refinance a $37.0 million mortgage loan secured by our Sunset Bronson property that was scheduled to mature on April 30, 2011. The remaining proceeds were used to partially pay down our secured revolving credit facility. Until its repayment on February 11, 2011, the $37.0 million mortgage loan secured by our Sunset Bronson property incurred interest at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus 3.65% and was subject to the same interest rate contract swapping one-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 0.75% described earlier.
(3)
Outstanding balance as of December 31, 2010 reflects full project-level indebtedness on Rincon Center, without pro rata adjustment for our 51% share of the Rincon Center joint venture. On April 29, 2011, we closed a seven-year term loan totaling $110.0 million with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, secured by our Rincon Center property. The loan bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 5.134%. The loan fully refinanced the prior $106.0 million project loan on the property that was scheduled to mature on July 1, 2011. 
(4)
This loan was fully repaid as of September 1, 2011.
(5)
This loan was fully repaid as of June 1, 2011.
(6)
This loan was assumed on September 1, 2011 in connection with the closing of our acquisition of 625 Second Street property.
(7)
Represents unamortized amount of the non-cash mark-to-market adjustment on debt associated with the First Financial (as of December 31, 2010, only), Tierrasanta (as of December 31, 2010, only), Rincon (as of December 31, 2010, only), 10950 Washington, and 625 Second Street (as of September 30, 2011 only).

The Company presents its financial statements on a consolidated/combined basis. Notwithstanding such presentation, except to the extent expressly indicated, such as in the case of the project financing for our Sunset Gower and Sunset Bronson properties, our separate property owning subsidiaries are not obligors of or under the debt of their respective affiliates and each property owning subsidiary's separate liabilities do no constitute obligations of its respective affiliates.

6. Interest Rate Contracts

The indebtedness encumbering the Sunset Bronson property was subject to a collar on the LIBOR portion of the interest rate of not less than 2.55% and no greater than 3.87% until June 1, 2010. We had not designated the interest rate collar

15

Table of Contents

agreement as a hedging instrument for accounting purposes; therefore, the change in the fair value of the derivative instrument is reported in earnings. From and after June 1, 2010, the applicable interest rate became 5.90% per annum, until a new secured interest rate contract went effective upon the closing of the IPO and related formation transaction on June 29, 2010, which swapped one-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 0.75%. The interest rate contract for Sunset Bronson fixed one-month LIBOR on the full $37.0 million notional loan amount through April 30, 2011 on terms identical to the terms of the mortgage loan. We designated that interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes.

On February 11, 2011, we closed a five-year term loan totaling $92.0 million with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., secured by our Sunset Gower and Sunset Bronson media and entertainment campuses. The loan bears interest at a rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. $37.0 million of the loan was subject to the above described interest rate contract, which swapped one-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 0.75% through April 30, 2011. On March 16, 2011, we purchased an interest rate cap in order to cap one-month LIBOR at 3.715% on $50.0 million of the loan through its maturity on February 11, 2016. We designated that interest rate cap contract as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes.

The fair market value of the interest rate cap at September 30, 2011 was $202, and the fair market value of the interest rate swap at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $0 and a liability of $71, respectively.

7. Future Minimum Base Rents and Lease Payments Future Minimum Rents
Our properties are leased to tenants under operating leases with initial term expiration dates ranging from 2011 to 2020. Approximate future combined minimum rentals (excluding tenant reimbursements for operating expenses and without regard to cancellation options) for properties at September 30, 2011 are as follows for the years/periods ended December 31. The table does not include rents under leases at our media and entertainment properties with terms of one year or less.
 
2011 (three months ending December 31, 2011)
$
33,890

2012
65,553

2013
60,680

2014
47,884

2015
44,344

2016
34,940

Thereafter
59,705

Total future minimum rents
$
346,996

Future Minimum Lease Payments
In conjunction with the acquisition of the Sunset Gower Property, our subsidiary, SGS Realty II, LLC, assumed a ground lease agreement (expiring March 31, 2060) for a portion of the land with an unrelated party. Commencing September 1, 2007, the monthly rent increased to $15, whereas the monthly rent totaled $14 at the time of acquisition. The rental rate is subject to adjustment in March 2011 and every seven years thereafter. In conjunction with the acquisition of the Del Amo Office building, our subsidiary, Hudson Del Amo Office, LLC, assumed a ground sublease (expiring June 30, 2049) with an unrelated party. Rent under the ground sublease is $1.00 per year, with the sublessee being responsible for all impositions, insurance premiums, operating charges, maintenance charges, construction costs and other charges, costs and expenses that arise or may be contemplated under any provisions of the ground sublease. In conjunction with the acquisition of the 9300 Wilshire Boulevard building, our subsidiary, Hudson 9300 Wilshire, LLC, assumed a ground lease (expiring August 14, 2032) with an unrelated party. Minimum rent under the ground lease is $75 per year (additional rent under this lease of 6% of gross rentals less minimum rent, as defined in such lease, is not included in this amount). In conjunction with the acquisition of the 222 Kearny Office building, our subsidiary, Hudson 222 Kearny, LLC, assumed a ground lease (expiring June 14, 2054) with an unrelated party. Minimum rent under the ground lease is the greater of $975 per year or 20.0% of the first $8,000 of the tenant's “Operating Income” during any “Lease Year,” as such terms are defined in the ground lease. The chart below reflects the $975 per year lease payment.
The following table provides information regarding our future minimum lease payments at September 30, 2011 under these lease agreements.
 

16

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


2011 (three months ending December 31, 2011)
$
308

2012
1,231

2013
1,231

2014
1,231

2015
1,231

2016
1,231

Thereafter
45,618

Total future minimum rents
$
52,081


8. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, payables, and accrued liabilities are reasonable estimates of fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments. Fair values for notes payable are estimates based on rates currently prevailing for similar instruments of similar maturities. The estimated fair values of interest-rate contract/cap arrangements were derived from estimated values based on observable market data for similar instruments.
 
 
September 30, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
 
Carrying 
Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying 
Value
 
Fair Value
Notes payable
$
298,672

 
$
298,974

 
$
342,060

 
$
342,153

Derivative assets, disclosed as “Interest rate contracts”
202

 
202

 

 

Derivative liabilities, disclosed as “Interest rate contracts”

 

 
71

 
71

 
9. Equity

Non-controlling Interests

Common units in the Operating Partnership

Common units in our operating partnership are not owned by us, consisted of 2,610,941 common units of partnership interest in our operating partnership, or common units, and represented approximately 7.2% of the all common units in our operating partnership at September 30, 2011. Common units and shares of our common stock have essentially the same economic characteristics as they share equally in the total net income or loss distributions of our operating partnership. Investors who own common units have the right to cause our operating partnership to redeem any or all of their common units for cash equal to the then-current market value of one share of common stock, or, at our election, shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Redeemable non-controlling interest in consolidated real estate entity

Redeemable non-controlling interest in consolidated real estate entity relates to a joint venture relationship with an affiliate of Beacon Capital Partners (“Beacon”), an unrelated third party, in the Rincon Center property. We acquired a 51% interest in a 581,000 square foot commercial space owned by Beacon as described in note 3. We had a call right and Beacon had a put right that, if exercised, obligated us to make an additional investment to acquire the remaining 49% interest in the Rincon Center joint venture in the second quarter of 2011. On February 24, 2011, we exercised the call right and completed the acquisition of Beacon's 49% interest on April 29, 2011 for a purchase price of $38.7 million (before closing costs and prorations). In connection with the completion of this acquisition, we refinanced the Rincon Center property as described more fully in footnote 5 above.

6.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred units of the Operating Partnership

Series A cumulative redeemable preferred units in our operating partnership are 499,014 series A preferred units of partnership interest in our operating partnership, or series A preferred units, that are not owned by us. These series A preferred units are entitled to preferential distributions at a rate of 6.25% per annum on the liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit and are convertible at the option of the holder into common units or redeemable into cash or, at our option, exchangeable for registered shares of common stock, in each case after an initial holding period of not less than three years from the

17

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


consummation of this offering. For a description of the conversion and redemption rights of the series A preferred units, please see “Description of the Partnership Agreement of Hudson Pacific Properties, L.P.Material Terms of Our Series A Preferred Units” in our June 23, 2010 Prospectus.

8.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

Series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock are 3,500,000 shares of our series B preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. Dividends on our series B preferred stock are cumulative from the date of original issue (December 10, 2010) and payable quarterly on or about the last calendar day of each March, June, September and December, commencing on December 31, 2010, at the rate of 8.375% per annum of its $25.00 per share liquidation preference (equivalent to $2.09375 per share per annum). If following a change of control of the Company, either our series B preferred stock (or any preferred stock of the surviving entity that is issued in exchange for our series B preferred stock) or the common stock of the surviving entity, as applicable, is not listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, or quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market, or NASDAQ (or listed or quoted on a successor exchange or quotation system), holders of our series B preferred stock will be entitled to receive cumulative cash dividends from, and including, the first date on which both the change of control occurred and either our series B preferred stock (or any preferred stock of the surviving entity that is issued in exchange for our series B preferred stock) or the common stock of the surviving entity, as applicable, is not so listed or quoted, at the increased rate of 12.375% per annum per share of the liquidation preference of our series B preferred stock (equivalent to $3.09375 per annum per share) for as long as either our series B preferred stock (or any preferred stock of the surviving entity that is issued in exchange for our series B preferred stock) or the common stock of the surviving entity, as applicable, is not so listed or quoted. Except in instances relating to preservation of our qualification as a REIT or in connection with a change of control of the Company, our series B preferred stock is not redeemable prior to December 10, 2015. On and after December 10, 2015, we may redeem our series B preferred stock in whole, at any time, or in part, from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends to, but not including, the date of redemption. If at any time following a change of control either our series B preferred stock (or any preferred stock of the surviving entity that is issued in exchange for our series B preferred stock) or the common stock of the surviving entity, as applicable, is not listed on the NYSE or quoted on NASDAQ (or listed or quoted on a successor exchange or quotation system), we will have the option to redeem our series B preferred stock, in whole but not in part, within 90 days after the first date on which both the change of control has occurred and either our series B preferred stock (or any preferred stock of the surviving entity that is issued in exchange for our series B preferred stock) or the common stock of the surviving entity, as applicable, is not so listed or quoted, for cash at $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to, but not including, the redemption date. Our series B preferred stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding indefinitely unless redeemed by us, and it is not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption and is not convertible into any of our other securities. For a full description of the Series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock, please see “Description of our Preferred Stock” in our December 7, 2010 Prospectus.

Secondary Common Stock Offering and Private Placement

On May 3, 2011, we completed the public offering of 6,950,000 shares of common stock and the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option to purchase an additional 1,042,500 shares of our common stock at the public offering price of $14.62 per share. We also completed the private placement of 3,125,000 shares to investment funds affiliated with Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., at the same price.

Total proceeds from the public offering and the concurrent private placement, after underwriters' discount, were approximately $156.7 million (before transaction costs). Of the total, approximately $96.5 million was from the public offering of common stock, approximately $14.5 million was from the exercise of the over-allotment option and approximately $45.7 million was from the private placement investment.

The table below represent our condensed consolidated statements of equity and non-controlling series A preferred partnership and redeemable non-controlling interest in consolidated real estate entity interests:
 

18

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


 
Hudson Pacific Properties Inc., Stockholders' Equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common
Shares
Stock
Amount
Additional
Paid in
Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Deficit)
Income
Non-
controlling
Interests —
Common units
in the
Operating
Partnership
Members’ real estate Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests —
Interest in
consolidated
entities
Total Equity
Non-
controlling
Interests —
Series A
Cumulative
Redeemable
Preferred
Units
Balance, January 1, 2010
 
$

$

$

$

$

$
223,240

$
3,348

$
226,588

$

Contributions
 
 
8

 
 
 
3,645

 
3,653

 
Distributions
 
 
(79
)
 
 
 
(1,624
)
 
(1,703
)
 
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of underwriters discount
14,720,000

147

232,574

 
 
 
 
 
232,721

 
Proceed from private placement
1,176,471

12

19,988

 
 
 
 
 
20,000

 
Issuance of restricted stock
265,291

2

(2
)
 
 
 
 
 

 
Shares Repurchased
 
 
(1
)
 
 
 
 
 
(1
)
 
Issuance of Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units for acquisition of properties
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

12,475

Issuance of common units for acquisition of properties
 
 
 
 
 
12,019

 
 
12,019

 
Common stock issuance transaction costs

 
 
(7,169
)
 
 
 
 
 
(7,169
)
 
Declared Dividend
 
 
(2,085
)
 
 
 
 
 
(2,085
)
 
Acquisition of non-controlling members Interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(828
)
(828
)
 
Amortization of stock based compensation
 
 
375

 
 
 
 
 
375

 
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
(2,323
)
 
(277
)
283

(29
)
(2,346
)
195

Cash Flow Hedge Adjustment
 
 
 
 
(30
)
(4
)
 
 
(34
)
 
Comprehensive Loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2,380
)
 
Exchange of Member’s equity for common stock and units
6,050,037

61

173,390

 
 
54,584

(225,544
)
(2,491
)

 
Balance, September 30, 2010
22,211,799

$
222

$
416,999

$
(2,323
)
$
(30
)
$
66,322

$

$

$
481,190

$
12,670


 
Hudson Pacific Properties Inc., Stockholders' Equity
 
 
 
 
 
Common
Shares
Stock
Amount
Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Additional
Paid in
Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Deficit)
Income
Non-
controlling
Interests —
Common units
in the
Operating
Partnership
Total Equity
Non-
controlling
Interests —
Series A
Cumulative
Redeemable
Preferred
Units
Non-
controlling
Interests —
Interests in
Consolidated
Entities
Balance, January 1, 2011
22,436,950

$
224

$
87,500

$
411,598

$
(3,482
)
$
6

$
65,684

$
561,530

$
12,475

$
40,328

Contributions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Distributions
 
 
 
(452
)
 
 
 
(452
)
 
(41,131
)
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of underwriters discount
7,992,500

80

 
110,928

 
 
 
111,008

 
 
Proceed from private placement
3,125,000

31

 
45,657

 
 
 
45,688

 
 
Issuance of restricted stock
37,917

1

 
(1
)
 
 
 

 
 
Forfiture of restricted stock
(7,535
)
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Shares repurchased
(12,378
)
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Common stock issuance transaction costs

 
 
 
(600
)
 
 
 
(600
)
 
 
Series B stock issuance transaction costs
 
 
 
(1,283
)
 
 
 
(1,283
)
 
 
Declared Dividend
 
 
(5,496
)
(11,201
)
 
 
(978
)
(17,675
)
(585
)
 
Amortization of stock based compensation
 
 
 
2,004

 
 
 
2,004

 
 
Net income (loss)
 
 
5,496

 
(7,106
)
 
(698
)
(2,308
)
585

803

Cash Flow Hedge Adjustment
 
 
 
 
 
(853
)
(75
)
(928
)
 
 
Comprehensive Loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,236
)
 
 
Balance, September 30, 2011
33,572,454

$
336

$
87,500

$
556,650

$
(10,588
)
$
(847
)
$
63,933

$
696,984

$
12,475

$



19

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


Dividends

During the third quarter for 2011, we declared dividends on our common stock and non-controlling common partnership interests of $0.125 per share and unit. We also declared dividends on our series A preferred partnership interests of $0.3906 per unit. In addition, we declared dividends on our series B preferred shares of $0.52344 per share. The third quarter dividends were declared on September 9, 2011 to holders of record on September 20, 2011.

Taxability of Dividends

Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of distributions to stockholders, may differ from income reported for financial reporting purposes due to the differences for federal income tax purposes in the treatment of loss on extinguishment of debt, revenue recognition, and compensation expense and in the basis of depreciable assets and estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation.

Stock-Based Compensation

In connection with entering into the employment arrangements effective as of closing of the IPO, Messrs. Coleman, Stern, Lammas, Barton, Shimoda, and certain non-executive employees and directors were granted 270,588 restricted shares of our common stock at our initial offering price of $17.00 per restricted share. These restricted stock awards vest in three equal, annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of the IPO, subject to the executive’s or director's continued service, as applicable. As of September 30, 2011, 88,237 of these stock awards had vested, 12,378 of which were canceled in satisfaction of federal and state taxes.

On December 29, 2010, various executives were granted 219,854 restricted shares of our common stock at the closing price of $15.01 per restricted share. These restricted stock awards vest in three equal, annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of their date of grant, subject to the executive’s continued employment. None of these restricted shares were vested at September 30, 2011.

On January 20, 2011 our directors were granted 11,571 restricted shares and 3,308 unrestricted shares (fully vested) of our common stock at the closing price of $15.12 per restricted share. The restricted stock awards vest in three equal, annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of their date of grant, subject to the director's continued service. None of the restricted shares were vested at September 30, 2011.

On April 8, 2011 our directors were granted 1,740 unrestricted shares (fully vested) of our common stock at the closing price of $14.36 per restricted share.

In connection with his resignation as a director effective April 25, 2011, 7,535 restricted shares previously granted to Mark Burnett were forfeited, unvested.

On June 9, 2011 our directors were granted 19,686 restricted shares of our common stock at the closing price of $15.24 per restricted share. The restricted stock awards vest in three equal, annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of their date of grant, subject to the director's continued service. None of the restricted shares were vested at September 30, 2011.

On July 12, 2011 our directors were granted 1,612 unrestricted shares (fully vested) of our common stock at the closing price of $15.50 per restricted share.

In connection with his appoint as a director on October 1, 2011, Patrick Whitesell was granted 2,259 restricted shares of our common stock based on the June 9, 2011 grant to our directors in connection with their election to the board, prorated for Mr. Whitesell's partial period of service. This grant will vest in three equal installments consistent with the June 9, 2011 grant to the other directors. None of the restricted shares were vested at September 30, 2011.

We have elected to recognize the total compensation expense for time-vested shares on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, $2,004 of non-cash compensation expense was recognized in general and administrative expenses and additional paid-in capital.


10. Related Party Transactions


20

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


Until the IPO and related formation transactions, the media and entertainment properties owned by our predecessor were managed by Hudson Studios Management, LLC and our City Plaza office property was managed by Hudson OP Management, LLC (Hudson Studios Management, LLC and Hudson OP Management, LLC are collectively referred to as “Hudson Management”), both of which were affiliates of our predecessor. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, management fees of $460 had been incurred. In addition, Hudson Management was entitled to a construction management fee of $300 plus 5% of the hard costs in association with other future developments. As of September 30, 2010, $300 of construction management fees had been capitalized to construction in progress. These agreements were effectively terminated upon our acquisition of Hudson Management.

The developers and managers of the 875 Howard Street Property were TMG Partners and Flynn Properties, Inc. TMG Partners was also the managing member. TMG Partners and Flynn Properties, Inc. jointly began providing property management services for the 875 Howard Street Property starting February 15, 2007. A monthly property management fee equal to the greater of $20 per month or 2.5% of gross rents received from tenants during each calendar month was paid in equal parts to TMG Partners and Flynn Properties, Inc. These fees totaled $78 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.


11. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal

From time to time, the Company is party to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings arising out of, or incident to, our ordinary course of business. Management believes, based in part upon consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate resolution of all such claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. As of September 30, 2011, the risk of material loss from such legal actions impacting the Company's financial condition or results from operations has been assessed as remote

Concentrations

All of the Company’s Properties are located in California which exposes the Company to greater economic risks than if it owned a more geographically dispersed portfolio. Further, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, approximately 27% and 63%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues were derived from tenants in the media and entertainment industry, which makes the Company susceptible to demand for rental space in such industry. Consequently, the Company is subject to the risks associated with an investment in real estate with a concentration of tenants in that industry.

Bank of America leases approximately 836,000 square feet of our 1455 Market property for various lease terms ranging between one and seven years. As a result of our purchase of this property on December 16, 2010, this lease did not account for any portion of our total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Bank of America Lease accounted for approximately 7% of our total revenue.

12. Segment Reporting
The Company’s reporting segments are based on the Company’s method of internal reporting which classifies its operations into two reporting segments: (i) office properties, and (ii) media and entertainment properties. The Company evaluates performance based upon property net operating income from continuing operations (“NOI”) of the combined properties in each segment. NOI is not a measure of operating results or cash flows from operating activities as measured by GAAP, is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. All companies may not calculate NOI in the same manner. The Company considers NOI to be an appropriate supplemental financial measure to net income because it helps both investors and management to understand the core operations of the Company’s properties. The Company defines NOI as operating revenues (including rental revenues, other property-related revenue, tenant recoveries and other operating revenues), less property-level operating expenses (which includes external management fees and property-level general and administrative expenses). NOI excludes corporate general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairments, gain/loss on sale of real estate, interest expense, acquisition-related expenses and other non-operating items.
Summary information for the reportable segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is as follows:
 

21

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except square footage and share data)


 
Office Properties
 
Media and  Entertainment
Properties
 
Total
Revenue
$
76,404

 
$
28,724

28,724

$
105,128

Operating expenses
32,592

 
17,073

 
49,665

Net operating income
$
43,812

 
$
11,651

 
$
55,463

Summary information for the reportable segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is as follows:
 
 
Office Properties
 
Media and  Entertainment
Properties
 
Total
Revenue
$
14,826

 
$
24,724

 
$
39,550

Operating expenses
5,650

 
15,194

 
20,844

Net operating income
$
9,176

 
$
9,530

 
$
18,706

The following is reconciliation from NOI to reported net income, the most direct comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP:
 
 
September 30, 2011
 
September 30, 2010
Net operating income
$
55,463

 
$
18,706

General and administrative
(9,052
)
 
(2,379
)
Depreciation and amortization
(33,023
)
 
(9,985
)
Interest income
67

 
37

Unrealized gain on interest rate contract

 
347

Interest expense
(13,245
)
 
(6,196
)
Acquisition-related expenses
(762
)
 
(2,689
)
Other expense
(368
)
 
8

Net loss
$
(920
)
 
$
(2,151
)
There were no intersegment sales or transfers during either of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
13. Subsequent Events

Acquisitions and Financings

6922 Hollywood

On July 1, 2011, the Company executed a purchase agreement to acquire 6922 Hollywood Boulevard in Hollywood, for a total gross purchase price of $92.5 million (before closing costs and prorations), including the assumption of an existing $42.0 million loan. 6922 Hollywood is an approximately 205,522-square-foot project comprising approximately 171,828 square feet of office space and approximately 33,694 square feet of ground-floor retail space. The property is fully leased to multiple tenants, with an average remaining lease term of approximately seven years. The transaction is subject to the completion of various closing conditions, including the assumption of the loan. The $42.0 million loan bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 5.5775%, with 30-year amortization, and matures in January 2015.
    

22

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements
We make statements in this quarterly report that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. In particular, statements pertaining to our capital resources, portfolio performance and results of operations contain forward- looking statements. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “pro forma,” “estimates” or “anticipates” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases that are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and that do not relate solely to historical matters. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions.
Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:
adverse economic or real estate developments in our markets;
general economic conditions;
defaults on, early terminations of or non-renewal of leases by tenants;
fluctuations in interest rates and increased operating costs;
our failure to obtain necessary outside financing;
our failure to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness;
lack or insufficient amounts of insurance;
decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates;
difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and completing acquisitions;
our failure to successfully operate acquired properties and operations;
our failure to maintain our status as a REIT;
environmental uncertainties and risks related to adverse weather conditions and natural disasters;
financial market fluctuations;
changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates; and
other factors affecting the real estate industry generally.
While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, of new information, data or methods, future events or other changes. Additional information concerning these and other risks and uncertainties is contained in our other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Historical Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 represents an update to the more detailed and comprehensive disclosures included in our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Accordingly, you should read the following discussion in conjunction with the information included in our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as well as the unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In addition, some of the statements and assumptions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, including, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects as well as estimates of industry growth for the second quarter and beyond. See “Forward-Looking Statements.”

Overview

As indicated above, because the IPO and related formation transactions did not occur until June 29, 2010, operations for the entities acquired in connection with the IPO and related formation transactions are only included in certain historical

23

Table of Contents

financial statements. More particularly, the results of operations discussed below for the three months ended September 30, 2010 reflect the operations of the (a) three office properties and two media and entertainment properties owned by HFOP City Plaza, LLC, Sunset Bronson Entertainment Properties, LLC, SGS Realty II, LLC, and Howard Street Associates LLC, as applicable (the "Predecessor Properties"), and (b) two office properties and certain management contracts owned by Glenborough Tierrasanta, LLC, GLB Encino, LLC and Hudson Capital, LLC, as applicable, which were acquired on June 29, 2010 (the "IPO Acquisitions"). The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, reflect the operations of the Predecessor Properties for that entire period, and the results of operations for the IPO Acquisitions from the date of their acquisition. The results of operations for properties acquired after the IPO are similarly included in our consolidated statements of operations from the date of each such acquisition.

The following table identifies each of the properties in our portfolio acquired through September 30, 2011 and their date of acquisition.
Properties
Acquisition/Completion Date
Square Feet
875 Howard Street
2/15/2007
286,270

Sunset Gower
8/17/2007
543,709

Sunset Bronson
1/30/2008
313,723

Technicolor Building
6/1/2008
114,958

City Plaza
8/26/2008
333,922

First Financial
6/29/2010
222,423

Tierrasanta
6/29/2010
104,234

Del Amo Office
8/13/2010
113,000

9300 Wilshire Boulevard
8/24/2010
58,484

222 Kearny
10/8/2010
148,797

1455 Market
12/16/2010
1,012,012

Rincon Center (1)
12/16/2010
580,850

10950 Washington
12/22/2010
158,873

604 Arizona
7/26/2011
44,260

275 Brannan
8/19/2011
51,710

625 Second Street
9/1/2011
136,906

Total
 
4,224,131


(1) We acquired a 51% joint venture interest in the Rincon Center property on December 16, 2010. On April 29, 2011 we acquired the remaining 49% interest in the Rincon Center property for approximately $38.7 million (before closing costs and prorations).

All amounts and percentages used in this discussion of our results of operations are calculated using the numbers presented in the financial statements contained in this report rather than the rounded numbers appearing in this discussion.

Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2011 to the three months ended September 30, 2010

Revenue

Total Office Revenue. Total office revenue consists of rental revenue, tenant recoveries, and other revenue. Total office revenues increased $19.1 million, or 250.9%, to $26.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $7.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The period-over-period changes in the items that comprise total revenue are attributable primarily to the factors discussed below.

Office Rental Revenue. Office rental revenue includes rental revenues from our office properties and percentage rent on retail space contained within those properties. Total office rental revenue increased $12.4 million, or 190.6%, to $19.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $6.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The

24

Table of Contents

increase in rental revenue from a year ago was primarily the result of rental revenue from office properties acquired during the third and fourth quarters of 2010 and third quarter of 2011.

Office Tenant Recoveries. Office tenant recoveries increased $6.4 million, or 643.0%, to $7.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in tenant recoveries was primarily the result of recoveries from office properties acquired during the third and fourth quarters of 2010 and third quarter of 2011.

Office Other Revenue. Other revenue remained relatively flat for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Total Media & Entertainment Revenue. Total media and entertainment revenue consists of rental revenue, tenant recoveries, other property-related revenue and other revenue. Total media and entertainment revenues increased $0.3 million, or 3.0%, to $10.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $9.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The period-over-period changes in the items that comprise total revenue are attributable primarily to the factors discussed below.

Media & Entertainment Rental Revenue. Media and entertainment rental revenue includes rental revenues from our media and entertainment properties, percentage rent on retail space contained within those properties, and lease termination income. Total media and entertainment rental revenue remained relatively flat for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Media & Entertainment Tenant Recoveries. Tenant recoveries remained relatively flat for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Media & Entertainment Other Property-Related Revenue. Other property-related revenue is revenue that is derived from the tenants’ rental of lighting and other equipment, parking, power, HVAC and telecommunications (telephone and internet). Total other property-related revenue increased $0.4 million, or 9.2%, to $4.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $4.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in other property-related revenue was primarily due to an increase in lighting equipment rental revenue, parking revenue, and telecom revenue relating to higher production activity at our media and entertainment properties.

Operating Expenses

Total Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses consist of property operating expenses, as well as property and corporate level general and administrative expenses, other property related expenses, management fees and depreciation and amortization. Total operating expenses increased by $17.3 million, or 111.8%, to $32.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $15.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. This increase in total operating expenses is attributable primarily to the factors discussed below.

Office Operating Expenses. Office operating expenses increased $10.0 million, or 353.0%, to $12.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to the acquisitions of office properties during the third and fourth quarters of 2010 and third quarter of 2011.

Media & Entertainment Operating Expenses. Media and entertainment operating expenses remained relatively flat for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses includes wages and salaries for corporate-level employees, accounting, legal and other professional services, office supplies, entertainment, travel, and automobile expenses, telecommunications and computer-related expenses, and other miscellaneous items. General and administrative expenses increased $0.5 million, or 19.5%, to $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increased staffing to meet operational needs stemming from growth through the acquisitions of office properties.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $6.7 million, or 155.6%, to $11.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $4.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the depreciation associated with the acquisitions of office properties during the third

25

Table of Contents

and fourth quarters of 2010 and third quarter of 2011.

Other Expense (Income)

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $2.3 million, or 128.3%, to $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the increased indebtedness associated with the acquisitions of office properties during the third and fourth quarters of 2010 and third quarter of 2011.

Acquisition-related expenses. Acquisition-related expenses increased $0.5 million, or 197.7%, to $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was due to increased acquisition activity during the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to a year ago.

Net Income (Loss)

Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $0.8 million compared to net income of $27,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in net loss was primarily due to higher operating expenses, higher general and administrative expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher interest expenses and acquisition-related expenses, offset by higher office and media and entertainment revenues, all as described above.

Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to the nine months ended September 30, 2010

Revenue

Total Office Revenue. Total office revenue consists of rental revenue, tenant recoveries, and other revenue. Total office revenues increased $61.6 million (including early lease termination revenue from a single floor tenant at our City Plaza project), or 415.3%, to $76.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $14.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The period-over-period changes in the items that comprise total revenue are attributable primarily to the factors discussed below.

Office Rental Revenue. Office rental revenue includes rental revenues from our office properties and percentage rent on retail space contained within those properties. Total office rental revenue increased $41.5 million, or 324.6%, to $54.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $12.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in rental revenue from a year ago was primarily the result of rental revenue from office properties acquired during the third and fourth quarters of 2010 and third quarter of 2011.

Office Tenant Recoveries. Office tenant recoveries increased $17.7 million, or 922.7%, to $19.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in tenant recoveries was primarily the result of recoveries from office properties acquired during the third and fourth quarters of 2010 and third quarter of 2011.

Office Other Revenue. Other revenue increased $2.4 million, or 1,928.0%, to $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in other revenue was primarily the result of the early lease termination revenue from a single floor tenant at our City Plaza project.

Total Media & Entertainment Revenue. Total media and entertainment revenue consists of rental revenue, tenant recoveries, other property-related revenue and other revenue. Total media and entertainment revenues increased $4.0 million, or 16.2%, to $28.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $24.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The period-over-period changes in the items that comprise total revenue are attributable primarily to the factors discussed below.

Media & Entertainment Rental Revenue. Media and entertainment rental revenue includes rental revenues from our media and entertainment properties, percentage rent on retail space contained within those properties, and lease termination income. Total media and entertainment rental revenue increased $0.8 million, or 5.2%, to $16.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $15.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in rental revenue was primarily due to improved occupancy at our media and entertainment properties.

Media & Entertainment Tenant Recoveries. Tenant recoveries remained relatively flat for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

26

Table of Contents


Media & Entertainment Other Property-Related Revenue. Other property-related revenue is revenue that is derived from the tenants’ rental of lighting and other equipment, parking, power, HVAC and telecommunications (telephone and internet). Total other property-related revenue increased $3.1 million, or 38.7%, to $11.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $8.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in other property-related revenue was primarily due to an increase in lighting equipment rental revenue, parking revenue, and telecom revenue relating to higher production activity associated with improved occupancy at our media and entertainment properties.

Operating Expenses

Total Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses consist of property operating expenses, as well as property level and corporate general and administrative expenses, other property related expenses, management fees and depreciation and amortization. Total operating expenses increased by $58.5 million, or 176.3%, to $91.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $33.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This increase in total operating expenses is attributable primarily to the factors discussed below.

Office Operating Expenses. Office operating expenses increased $26.9 million, or 476.8%, to $32.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $5.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to the acquisitions of office properties during the third and fourth quarters of 2010 and third quarter of 2011, which was partially offset by certain property tax reassessment savings, mostly associated with our City Plaza property.

Media & Entertainment Operating Expenses. Media and entertainment operating expenses increased $1.9 million, or 12.4%, to $17.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $15.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in operating expenses was due to an increase in other property-related expenses, primarily lighting and other equipment rental expenses, resulting from higher production activity associated with improved occupancy at our media and entertainment properties, which was partially offset by certain property tax reassessment savings.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses includes wages and salaries for corporate-level employees, accounting, legal and other professional services, office supplies, entertainment, travel, and automobile expenses, telecommunications and computer-related expenses, and other miscellaneous items. Since the IPO, 2010 private placement, and formation transactions did not occur until June 29, 2010, the nine months ended September 30, 2010 only include general and administrative expenses for corporate-level operations beginning June 29, 2010 and thereafter. The $9.1 million of general and administration expenses reflect the expenses of our corporate-level operations for the entire nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $2.4 million of corporate-level operations occurring over the period commencing as of June 29, 2010 and ending September 30, 2010.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $23.0 million, or 230.7%, to $33.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $10.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the depreciation associated with the acquisitions of office properties in connection with our initial public offering and during the third and fourth quarters of 2010.

Other Expense (Income)

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $7.0 million, or 113.8%, to $13.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $6.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the increased indebtedness associated with the acquisitions of office properties during the third and fourth quarters of 2010 and third quarter of 2011.

Unrealized Gain on Interest Rate Contracts. Unrealized gain on interest rate contracts decreased by $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of the expiration of an interest rate contract that was not accounted for as an effective cash flow hedge.

Acquisition-related expenses. Acquisition-related expenses decreased by $1.9 million, or 71.7%, to $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease was a result of lower acquisition activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the acquisition activity culminating with our IPO and the related formation transactions.

Net loss

27

Table of Contents


Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $0.9 million compared to net loss of $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in net loss was primarily due to higher office and media and entertainment revenues and lower acquisition-related expenses, partially offset by higher operating expenses, higher general and administrative expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, and higher interest expenses, all as described above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Analysis of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our ratio of debt to total market capitalization was approximately 37.9% (counting series A preferred units as debt) as of September 30, 2011. Our total market capitalization is defined as the sum of the market value of our outstanding common stock (which may decrease, thereby increasing our debt to total capitalization ratio), including restricted stock that we may issue to certain of our directors and executive officers, plus the aggregate value of common units not owned by us, plus the liquidation preference of outstanding series A preferred units and series B preferred stock, plus the book value of our total consolidated indebtedness. We had approximately $20.7 million of cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2011. In addition, the lead arrangers for our secured credit facility have secured commitments that will allow borrowings of up to $200 million. As of September 30, 2011, we had approximately $141.2 million of total capacity under our credit facility, of which $33.0 million had been drawn. We intend to use the secured credit facility, among other things, to finance the acquisition of properties, to refinance indebtedness, to provide funds for tenant improvements and capital expenditures and to provide for working capital and other corporate purposes.
Our short-term liquidity requirements primarily consist of operating expenses and other expenditures associated with our properties, distributions to our limited partners and dividend payments to our stockholders required to maintain our REIT status, capital expenditures and, potentially, acquisitions. We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through cash on hand, net cash provided by operations, reserves established from existing cash and, if necessary, by drawing upon our secured credit facility.
Our long-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for the repayment of debt at maturity, property acquisitions and non-recurring capital improvements. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements with net cash from operations, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness and the issuance of equity and debt securities. We also may fund property acquisitions and non-recurring capital improvements using our secured credit facility pending permanent financing.
We believe we have access to multiple sources of capital to fund our long-term liquidity requirements, including the incurrence of additional debt and the issuance of additional equity. However, our ability to incur additional debt will be dependent on a number of factors, including our degree of leverage, the value of our unencumbered assets and borrowing restrictions that may be imposed by lenders. Our ability to access the equity capital markets will be dependent on a number of factors as well, including general market conditions for REITs and market perceptions about our company.
Cash Flows
Comparison of nine months ended September 30, 2011 to nine months ended September 30, 2010
Cash and cash equivalents were $20.7 million and $48.9 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $24.7 million to $28.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase is primarily due to the acquisition of certain ownership interests in properties contributed in connection with our initial public offering and related formation transactions and the purchase of nine properties subsequent to our initial public offering which increased operating cash flow and partially offset by an increase in restricted cash at our Sunset Bronson/Sunset Gower properties resulting from restricted cash requirements as a result of the financing completed in February 2011.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $13.7 million to $70.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $56.7 million for nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to an increase in investments in real estate, primarily as a result of the purchase of certain ownership interests in properties contributed in connection with our IPO and related formation transactions. and an increase in property acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $77.4 million to $14.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $91.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease was due to the

28

Table of Contents

proceeds from the issuance of common stock in connection with our IPO and private placement which was partially offset by the repayment of certain indebtedness in connection with the related formation transactions which occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, and offset by the issuance of common stock and private placement and the net loan and line of credit repayments and cash distributions to our common and preferred unit and share holders which occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Indebtedness
Our indebtedness creates the possibility that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay when due the principal of, interest on or other amounts due in respect of our indebtedness and other obligations. In addition, we may incur additional debt from time to time to finance strategic acquisitions, investments, joint ventures or for other purposes, subject to the restrictions contained in the documents governing our indebtedness. If we incur additional debt, the risks associated with our leverage, including our ability to service our debt, would increase.
As of September 30, 2011, we had outstanding notes payable of $298.1 million (before loan premium), of which $125.0 million, or 41.9%, was variable rate debt, $50.0 million of which is subject to the interest rate contract described in footnote 2 in the table below.
The following table sets forth information as of September 30, 2011 with respect to our outstanding indebtedness.
Debt
September 30, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
 
Interest Rate (1)
 
Maturity
Date
Mortgage loan secured by Sunset Bronson (2)
$

 
$
37,000

 
LIBOR+3.65%
 
4/30/2011
Mortgage loan secured by Rincon Center (3)

 
106,000

 
6.08%
 
7/1/2011
Mortgage loan secured by First Financial (4)

 
43,000

 
5.34%
 
12/1/2011
Mortgage loan secured by Tierrasanta (5)

 
14,300

 
5.62%
 
12/1/2011
Mortgage loan secured by 10950 Washington
30,000

 
30,000

 
5.94%
 
2/11/2012
Secured Revolving Credit Facility (6)
33,000

 
111,117

 
LIBOR+2.50% to 3.25%
 
6/29/2013
Mortgage loan secured by 625 Second Street
33,700

 

 
5.85%
 
2/1/2014
Mortgage loan secured by Sunset Gower/Sunset Bronson (2)
92,000

 

 
LIBOR+3.50%
 
2/11/2016
Mortgage loan secured by Rincon Center (3)
109,397

 

 
5.134%
 
5/1/2018
Subtotal
$
298,097

 
$
341,417

 
 
 
 
Unamortized loan premium, net (7)
575

 
643

 
 
 
 
Total
$
298,672

 
$
342,060

 
 
 
 
__________________ 

(1)
Interest rate with respect to indebtedness is calculated on the basis of a 360-day year for the actual days elapsed, excluding the amortization of loan fees and costs.
(2)
On February 11, 2011, we closed a five-year term loan totaling $92.0 million with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., secured by our Sunset Gower and Sunset Bronson media and entertainment properties. The loan bears interest at a rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. $37.0 million of the loan was subject to an interest rate contract, which swaps one-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 0.75% through April 30, 2011. On March 16, 2011, we purchased an interest rate cap in order to cap one-month LIBOR at 3.715% with respect to $50.0 million of the loan through its maturity on February 11, 2016. Proceeds from the loan were used to fully refinance a $37.0 million mortgage loan secured by our Sunset Bronson property that was scheduled to mature on April 30, 2011. The remaining proceeds were used to partially pay down our secured revolving credit facility. Until its repayment on February 11, 2011, the $37.0 million mortgage loan secured by our Sunset Bronson property incurred interest at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus 3.65% and was subject to the same interest rate contract swapping one-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 0.75% described earlier.
(3)
Outstanding balance as of December 31, 2010 reflects full project-level indebtedness on Rincon Center, without pro rata adjustment for our 51% share of the Rincon Center joint venture. On April 29, 2011, we closed a seven-year term loan totaling $110.0 million with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, secured by our Rincon Center property. The loan fully refinanced the prior $106.0 million project loan on the property that was scheduled to mature on July 1, 2011. 
(4)
This loan was fully repaid as of September 1, 2011.
(5)
This loan was fully repaid as of June 1, 2011.
(6)
This loan was assumed on September 1, 2011 in connection with the closing of our acquisition of 625 Second Street property.
(7)
Represents unamortized amount of the non-cash mark-to-market adjustment on debt associated with the First Financial (as of December 31, 2010, only), Tierrasanta (as of December 31, 2010, only), Rincon (as of December 31, 2010, only), 10950 Washington, and 625 Second Street (as of September 30, 2011 only).
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
During the third quarter of 2011, there were no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the information regarding specified contractual obligations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

29

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our historical financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates of certain items and judgments as to certain future events, for example with respect to the allocation of the purchase price of acquired property among land, buildings, improvements, equipment, and any related intangible assets and liabilities, or the effect of a property tax reassessment of our properties. These determinations, even though inherently subjective and prone to change, affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. While we believe that our estimates are based on reasonable assumptions and judgments at the time they are made, some of our assumptions, estimates and judgments will inevitably prove to be incorrect. As a result, actual outcomes will likely differ from our accruals, and those differences—positive or negative—could be material. Some of our accruals are subject to adjustment, as we believe appropriate based on revised estimates and reconciliation to the actual results when available.

In addition, we identified certain critical accounting policies that affect certain of our more significant estimates and assumptions used in preparing our consolidated financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have not made any material changes to these policies during the periods covered by this Report.

ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. As more fully described in the interest rate risk section, we use derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to our borrowings. We only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors.
We had an interest rate agreement that expired on April 30, 2011 with respect to $37.0 million of the $92.0 million of total indebtedness on the Sunset Gower and Bronson properties pursuant to which we swapped one-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 0.75%, which effectively resulted in a 4.25% fixed rate on that portion of the Sunset Gower and Sunset Bronson loan. We also had an interest rate agreement with respect to $50.0 million of the same $92.0 million of total indebtedness on the Sunset Gower and Sunset Bronson properties that capped one-month LIBOR at a rate of 3.715%, effectively resulting in a maximum rate on that portion of the Sunset Gower and Sunset Bronson loan of 7.215%.
Interest risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur in that environment. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.
As of September 30, 2011, we had outstanding notes payable of $298.1 million (before loan premium), of which $125.0 million, or 41.9%, was variable rate debt, $50.0 million of which is subject to the interest rate contract described above, and $173.1 million of which was fixed rate secured mortgage loans. As of September 30, 2011, the estimated fair value of our fixed rate secured mortgage loans was $174.0 million.

ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As of September 30, 2011, the end of the period covered by this Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures at the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded, as of that time, that our disclosure controls

30

Table of Contents

and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act (i) is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
No changes to our internal control over financial reporting were identified in connection with the evaluation referenced above that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are party to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently a party, as plaintiff or defendant, to any legal proceedings that we believe to be material or that, individually or in the aggregate, would be expected to have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation if determined adversely to us. As of September 30, 2011, the risk of material loss from such legal actions impacting the Company's financial condition or results from operations has been assessed as remote.
 
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to the risk factors included in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Please review the Risk Factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

(a)
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities: On May 3, 2011, we completed the private placement of 3,125,000 shares of common stock to investment funds affiliated with Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., at the price of $14.62 per share for gross proceeds of $45.7 million. The private placement was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 thereunder.

(b)
Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities: On May 3, 2011, we completed the public offering of 7,992,500 shares of common stock (including the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option to purchase an additional 1,042,500 shares of the Company's common stock) at a price of $14.62 per share. 

Total proceeds from the public offering, after underwriters' discount, were approximately $111.0 million (before transaction costs). Immediately following the offering, the Company used approximately $81.0 million of the net proceeds from the offering and the concurrent private placement to repay indebtedness under its secured revolving credit facility.  On June 1, 2011, we used $14.3 million of the net proceeds from the offering and private placement to fully repay the project loan on its Tierrasanta property. The remaining proceeds will be primarily used to fund future acquisitions and for general working capital purposes. 

(c)
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers: None

 
 
ITEM 3.    
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.    
ITEM 4.    
(Removed and Reserved).

ITEM 5.    
OTHER INFORMATION.
None.

ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number
 
Description
 
 
 

31

Table of Contents

3.1

 
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.(2)
3.2

 
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.(2)
3.3

 
Form of Articles Supplementary of Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.(9)
4.1

 
Form of Certificate of Common Stock of Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.(5)
4.2

 
Form of Certificate of Series B Preferred Stock of Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.(9)
10.1

 
Form of Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hudson Pacific Properties, L.P.(9)
10.2

 
Registration Rights Agreement among Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and the persons named therein.(8)
10.3

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Victor J. Coleman.(8)
10.4

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Howard S. Stern.(8)
10.5

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Mark T. Lammas.(8)
10.6

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Christopher Barton.(8)
10.7

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Dale Shimoda.(8)
10.8

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Theodore R. Antenucci.(8)
10.9

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Mark Burnett.(8)
10.10

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Richard B. Fried.(8)
10.11

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Jonathan M. Glaser.(8)
10.12

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Mark D. Linehan.(8)
10.13

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Robert M. Moran, Jr.(8)
10.14

 
Indemnification Agreement, dated June 29, 1010, by and between Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Barry A. Porter.(8)
10.15

 
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Hudson Pacific Properties, L.P. 2010 Incentive Award Plan.(5) *
10.16