e424b3
Filed
Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration
No. 333-157067
JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/INFORMATION STATEMENT AND PROSPECTUS
PROPOSED
MERGER
To the Stockholders of SCM Microsystems, Inc. and Shareholders
of Hirsch Electronics Corporation:
The boards of directors of each of SCM Microsystems, Inc.
(SCM) and Hirsch Electronics Corporation
(Hirsch) have approved a merger transaction in which
the businesses of SCM and Hirsch will be combined. We are
sending the accompanying joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus to you to ask you to vote in favor of
this merger and the related transactions.
SCM is holding a special meeting of its stockholders in order to
obtain the stockholder approval necessary to complete the merger
with Hirsch and certain related matters. At the SCM special
meeting, which will be held at 1:00 p.m., local time, on
March 23, 2009, at SCMs U.S. office located at
41740 Christy Street, Fremont, California 94538, unless
postponed or adjourned to a later date, SCM will ask its
stockholders to approve, among other items, the issuance of
shares of SCM common stock and warrants to purchase shares of
SCM common stock to the securityholders of Hirsch in connection
with the merger, as described in the accompanying joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus.
After careful consideration, SCMs board of directors has
approved the merger and the related issuance of up to
9,661,470 shares of SCM common stock, par value $0.001, and
warrants to purchase up to 4,945,353 shares of SCM common stock
and has determined that the merger and such issuance of shares
and warrants is in the best interests of SCM and its
stockholders. Accordingly, SCMs board of directors
unanimously recommends that the SCM stockholders vote FOR each
of the proposals put to the SCM stockholders at the SCM special
meeting.
Hirsch is holding a special meeting of its shareholders in order
to obtain the shareholder approval necessary to complete the
merger with SCM. At the Hirsch special meeting, which will be
held at 7:30 p.m., local time, on March 11, 2009, at
Hirschs corporate headquarters located at 1900 Carnegie
Avenue, Building B, Santa Ana, California 92705, unless
postponed or adjourned to a later date, Hirsch will ask its
shareholders to approve, among other items, the merger, as
described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
After careful consideration, Hirschs board of directors
has approved the merger and has determined that the merger is in
the best interests of Hirsch and its shareholders.
Accordingly, Hirschs board of directors unanimously
recommends that the Hirsch shareholders vote FOR each of the
proposals put to the Hirsch shareholders at the Hirsch special
meeting.
Certain Hirsch shareholders, including Lawrence W. Midland, the
president of Hirsch, who in the aggregate own approximately 22%
of the outstanding shares of Hirsch common stock, have entered
into an irrevocable proxy and voting agreement whereby they have
agreed to vote in favor of the merger.
SCMs common stock is currently listed on the NASDAQ Stock
Markets National Market under the symbol SCMM
and on the Prime Standard of the Frankfort Stock Exchange under
the symbol SMY. On February 11, 2009, the last
practicable trading day before the date of this proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus, the closing sale
price of SCM common stock was $2.67 per share as reported
on the NASDAQ Stock Market.
More information about SCM, Hirsch and the proposed merger is
contained in the accompanying joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus. SCM and Hirsch urge you to read
the accompanying joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus carefully and in its entirety. In particular, you
should carefully consider the matters discussed in the section
entitled Risk Factors, beginning on page 12 of the
accompanying joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus.
Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of
shares you own of SCM or Hirsch. Please read the accompanying
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus
carefully and cast your proxy vote as promptly as possible.
SCM and Hirsch are excited about the opportunities the proposed
merger may bring to SCM stockholders and Hirsch shareholders,
and thank you for your consideration and continued support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Felix Marx
Chief Executive Officer
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
|
|
Lawrence W. Midland
President
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved the merger or
the securities of SCM to be issued in connection with the
merger, or determined if this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus is adequate or accurate. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The accompanying joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus is dated February 13, 2009, and is first being
mailed to SCM stockholders and Hirsch shareholders on or about
February 18, 2009.
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
Oskar-Messter-Str. 13, 85737
Ismaning, Germany
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On March 23,
2009
To SCM Microsystems, Inc. Stockholders:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of stockholders of
SCM Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held at
SCMs U.S. office located at 41740 Christy Street,
Fremont, California 94538, on March 23, 2009 at 1:00 p.m.,
local time for the following purposes:
1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the
issuance of new shares of SCM common stock, par value $0.001 per
share, and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock, to
securityholders of Hirsch, in connection with the merger
proposed under the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
December 10, 2008, by and among SCM, Hirsch Electronics
Corporation, a California corporation, and two wholly-owned
subsidiaries of SCM, pursuant to which Hirsch will become a new
Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary
of SCM through a two-step merger;
2. To consider and vote upon an adjournment of the SCM
special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if
there are not sufficient votes in favor of the proposal
described immediately above; and
To transact such other business that properly comes before the
SCM special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The foregoing proposals and the Agreement and Plan of Merger are
more fully described in the joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus accompanying this Notice. Only SCM
stockholders of record at the close of business on
February 11, 2009 will be entitled to notice of, and a vote
at, the SCM special meeting. At the close of business on
February 11, 2009, SCM had 15,743,515 shares of stock
outstanding and entitled to vote. A list of SCM stockholders
entitled to vote at the SCM special meeting will be available
for inspection at SCMs principal executive offices in
Ismaning, Germany and at its U.S. office in Fremont,
California.
All SCM stockholders are cordially invited to attend the SCM
special meeting in person. Whether or not you plan to attend
the SCM special meeting in person, please sign and return the
enclosed proxy card to ensure that your SCM shares will be
represented at the SCM special meeting. Voting instructions
are included with your SCM proxy card. You may revoke your SCM
proxy card at any time prior to the SCM special meeting by
following the instructions in the accompanying joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus. If you attend
the SCM special meeting and vote by ballot, then your proxy vote
will be revoked automatically and only your vote by ballot at
the SCM special meeting will be counted. Regardless of the
number shares of SCM that you own or whether or not you plan to
attend the SCM special meeting, it is important that your SCM
shares be represented and voted. No postage need be affixed if
your proxy card is mailed in the United States.
By Order of the SCM Board of Directors,
Stephan Rohaly
Secretary
Ismaning, Germany
February 13, 2009
SCMS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU
VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 1 AND 2.
HIRSCH ELECTRONICS
CORPORATION
1900 CARNEGIE AVENUE, BUILDING B
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held On March 11,
2009
Dear Hirsch Electronics Corporation Shareholders:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of the
shareholders of Hirsch Electronics Corporation, a California
corporation (Hirsch). The meeting will be held at
Hirschs corporate headquarters located at
1900 Carnegie Avenue, Building B, Santa Ana, California
92705 on March 11, 2009 at 7:30 p.m. local time for the
following purposes:
1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 10, 2008, by
and among Hirsch, SCM Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(SCM), and two wholly-owned subsidiaries of SCM,
pursuant to which Hirsch will become a new Delaware limited
liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM through a
two-step merger; and
2. To consider and vote upon an adjournment of the Hirsch
special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in
favor of the proposal described immediately above.
These proposals are more fully described in the accompanying
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus,
which we urge you to read very carefully. We have included a
copy of the Agreement and Plan of Merger as Annex A
to the accompanying joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus. Only Hirsch shareholders of record at
the close of business on February 10, 2009, the record date
for the Hirsch special meeting, are entitled to notice of and to
vote at the Hirsch special meeting or any adjournment or
postponement of the Hirsch special meeting.
The board of directors of Hirsch unanimously recommends that
you vote FOR Proposal No. 1 for adoption of the
Agreement and Plan of Merger and the transactions contemplated
thereby and FOR Proposal No. 2 for an adjournment of
the Hirsch special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional
proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of the
foregoing Proposal No. 1.
Even if you plan to attend the Hirsch special meeting in
person, Hirsch requests that you sign and return the enclosed
Hirsch proxy card to ensure that your Hirsch shares will be
represented at the Hirsch special meeting if you are unable to
attend.
By Order of the Hirsch Board of Directors,
Lawrence W. Midland
President
Santa Ana, California
February 13, 2009
PLEASE DO
NOT SEND IN ANY HIRSCH STOCK CERTIFICATES AT THIS TIME; FURTHER
DOCUMENTATION FOR SUCH PURPOSE WILL BE SENT TO HIRSCH
SHAREHOLDERS AFTER
APPROVAL AND COMPLETION OF THE MERGER.
REFERENCE
TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus
incorporates important business and financial information about
SCM from documents that SCM files with the SEC and which are not
included in or delivered with this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus. You can obtain
such documents, other than certain exhibits to those documents,
by requesting them in writing or by telephone from SCM at the
following address:
In the United States:
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
41740 Christy Street
Fremont, CA 94538
+1
510-249-4883
ir@scmmicro.com
In Europe:
SCM Microsystems GmbH
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13
85737 Ismaning, Germany
+49 89
9595-5220
ir@scmmicro.com
You may also request more information directly from SCMs
proxy solicitor, Georgeson, Inc. by sending an email to the
following address: scm@georgeson.com.
You will not be charged for any documents that you request.
If you would like to request documents, please do so by
March 17, 2009 in order to receive timely delivery of the
documents in advance of the SCM special meeting. See the section
entitled Where You Can Find More Information for a
detailed description of the documents incorporated by reference
into this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus.
Hirsch is not subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Accordingly,
Hirsch does not file documents with the SEC.
Information contained on the websites of SCM and Hirsch are
expressly not incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the SCM Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on
March 23, 2009 and the Hirsch Shareholder Meeting to Be
Held on March 11, 2009.
The joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus is available at www.scmmicro.com.
ABOUT
THIS DOCUMENT
This joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus
forms a part of a registration statement on
Form S-4
(Registration
No. 333-157067),
filed by SCM Microsystems, Inc. with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, and constitutes a prospectus of SCM
under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and the rules thereunder, with respect to the shares of SCM
common stock and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
to be issued to securityholders of Hirsch Electronics
Corporation in connection with the proposed merger and the
related transactions.
In addition, this joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus constitutes:
|
|
|
|
|
A notice of meeting with respect to the SCM special meeting at
which SCMs stockholders will consider and vote on certain
proposals, including the proposal regarding the issuance of SCM
common stock and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
in connection with merger;
|
|
|
|
A proxy statement under Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules thereunder, with
respect to the SCM special meeting;
|
|
|
|
A notice of meeting with respect to the Hirsch special meeting
at which Hirschs shareholders will consider a proposal
regarding the merger; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
An information statement with respect to the Hirsch special
meeting.
|
NOTE REGARDING
TRADEMARKS
Opening the Digital World is a trademark of SCM; SCM, the SCM
logo, @MAXX, CHIPDRIVE and SmartOS are registered trademarks of
SCM.
The Hirsch logo, the Velocity logo, ScrambleSmart,
ScrambleSmartProx, MATCH, DIGI*TRAC, Hirsch Verification
Station, RUU-201, MOMENTUM, BioSmart, We Secure Buildings,
Upgrade to Hirsch, The Secure Decision, DigiLock, Rapid
Deployment Kit, ScrambleNet, XBox, NET*MUX4, S*NET, X*NET, SNIB
and SNIB2 are trademarks of Hirsch; ScramblePad, ScrambleProx
and IDK are registered trademarks of Hirsch.
This joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus
may also include trademarks and trade names owned by other
parties, and all other such trademarks and trade names mentioned
in this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
ii
ANNEXES
|
|
|
Annex A
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger
|
Annex B
|
|
Irrevocable Proxy and Voting Agreement
|
Annex C
|
|
Stockholder Agreement
|
Annex D
|
|
Form of Warrant Certificate
|
Annex E
|
|
Written Opinion of Avondale Partners, LLC
|
Annex F
|
|
Written Opinion of Imperial Capital, LLC
|
Annex G
|
|
First Amendment to SCM Rights Agreement
|
Annex H
|
|
Settlement Agreement between Hirsch Electronics Corporation,
Secure Keyboards, Ltd. and Secure Networks, Ltd.
|
Annex I
|
|
Amended and Restated Letters of Understanding between SCM and
each of Secure Keyboards, Ltd. and
Secure Networks, Ltd.
|
Annex J
|
|
Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement between SCM and
Lawrence W. Midland
|
Annex K
|
|
Employment Agreement between Hirsch Electronics Corporation and
Robert Beliles
|
Annex L
|
|
Employment Agreement between Hirsch Electronics Corporation and
Larry Midland
|
Annex M
|
|
Employment Agreement between Hirsch Electronics Corporation and
John Piccininni
|
Annex N
|
|
Employment Agreement between Hirsch Electronics Corporation and
Rob Zivney
|
Annex O
|
|
California Corporations Code, Sections 1300-1313
|
iii
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER,
THE SCM SPECIAL MEETING AND THE HIRSCH SPECIAL MEETING
The following section provides answers to certain frequently
asked questions about the proposed merger, SCM special meeting
of stockholders and Hirsch special meeting of shareholders.
Please note that this section may not address all issues that
may be important to you as an SCM stockholder or a Hirsch
shareholder. Accordingly, you should carefully read this entire
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus,
including each of the annexes.
|
|
|
Q. |
|
Why am I receiving this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus? |
|
A. |
|
You are receiving this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus because you are either a stockholder of
SCM or a shareholder of Hirsch as of the respective record date
of SCMs special meeting of its stockholders or
Hirschs special meeting of its shareholders. This joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus is being
used by the boards of directors of each of SCM and Hirsch to
solicit your proxy for use at the SCM special meeting and to
solicit your proxy for use at the Hirsch special meeting,
respectively. This joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus also serves as the prospectus for shares of SCM
common stock and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
to be issued in exchange for shares of Hirsch common stock and
warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock in connection with the
merger. |
|
|
|
This joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus
contains important information about the merger, the Merger
Agreement, the SCM special meeting and the Hirsch special
meeting, which you should read carefully before voting. The
enclosed voting materials allow you to cause your shares of SCM
common stock or Hirsch common stock, as the case may be, to be
voted, without attending the SCM special meeting and the Hirsch
special meeting in person. |
About the
Merger
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What is the merger? |
|
A. |
|
The proposed merger is a two-step transaction that will result
in the combination of the businesses of SCM and Hirsch, whereby
Hirsch will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM. |
|
|
|
In exchange for their shares of Hirsch common stock and warrants
to purchase shares of Hirsch common stock, the securityholders
of Hirsch will receive cash, shares of SCM common stock and
warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock. |
|
|
|
More specifically, SCM, Deer Acquisition, Inc., a California
corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM (Merger Sub
1), Hart Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company and wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM (Merger Sub
2) and Hirsch have entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of December 10, 2008 (the Merger
Agreement). The Merger Agreement contains the terms and
conditions of the proposed combination of the businesses of SCM
and Hirsch. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement: |
|
|
|
Merger Sub 1 will merge with and into Hirsch, with
Hirsch as the surviving corporation;
|
|
|
|
as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, Hirsch
will merge with and into Merger Sub 2, with Merger Sub 2 as the
surviving entity; and
|
|
|
|
as a result of the mergers, the business and assets
of Hirsch will be held by a new Delaware limited liability
company and wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM (the Surviving
Subsidiary).
|
|
|
|
The transactions described above are referred to as the
Merger in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus. |
|
Q. |
|
What if the Merger is not completed? |
|
A. |
|
It is possible that the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement will not be completed. This
might happen if, for example, SCMs stockholders do not
approve the issuance of the SCM shares and warrants in
connection with the Merger, or if Hirschs shareholders do
not approve the Merger. Should that occur, neither SCM nor
Hirsch will be under any obligation to make or consider any
alternative proposal regarding the combination of SCM and
Hirsch. In certain circumstances, however, SCM or Hirsch may be
obligated to pay the other party a termination fee and reimburse
the other party for certain expenses, as |
iv
|
|
|
|
|
further described in the section entitled The Merger
Agreement Termination in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus. |
|
Q. |
|
Why are SCM and Hirsch proposing to merge? |
|
|
|
A. |
|
The board of directors of SCM has determined that the Merger and
the related transactions are in the best interests of SCM and
its stockholders in part because it presents a compelling
strategic opportunity for SCM to strengthen its position in the
security industry, expand its product offerings and customer
base, and increase its operational scale, among other reasons.
The board of directors of Hirsch has determined that the Merger
and the related transactions are in the best interests of Hirsch
and its shareholders in part because it allows Hirsch
shareholders to gain access to an equity interest in SCM and to
participate both in the future performance not only of Hirsch
but of SCM, and positions the combined company to pursue a
strategy focused on the industry trend towards convergence of
logical and physical access solutions. For a complete discussion
of SCMs and Hirschs reasons for the Merger, see the
sections entitled The Merger The SCM Reasons
for the Merger and The Merger The Hirsch
Reasons for the Merger in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus. |
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What vote is required by the SCM stockholders to consummate
the Merger? |
|
A. |
|
To consummate the Merger, SCM stockholders must approve the
issuance of shares of SCM common stock and warrants to purchase
SCM common stock in the Merger. The approval of such issuance
requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of SCM
common stock present in person or represented by proxy and
entitled to vote at the SCM special meeting at which a quorum is
present, whether voting in person or represented by proxy at the
SCM special meeting. |
|
Q. |
|
What vote is required by the Hirsch shareholders to
consummate the Merger? |
|
A. |
|
To consummate the Merger, Hirsch shareholders must approve the
Merger, which requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding Hirsch common stock as of the record
date for the Hirsch special meeting. In addition, pursuant to
the Merger Agreement, a condition to SCMs obligation to
complete the Merger is that the Merger shall have been approved
by Hirsch shareholders holding a majority of the shares of
Hirsch common stock outstanding as of the record date for the
Hirsch special meeting, without including the affirmative votes
of any shares of Hirsch common stock held or beneficially owned
by any of Hirschs directors who could be deemed to have a
material financial interest in the Merger or any of the
transactions contemplated in connection with the Merger. In
addition, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, an additional
condition to SCMs obligation to complete the Merger is
that not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Hirsch shall
be dissenting shares which, among other things, are shares that
were not voted in favor of the Merger and for which a demand for
payment and appraisal has been properly made in accordance with
the California Corporations Code. |
|
Q. |
|
What is the irrevocable proxy and voting agreement and who
are the parties to that agreement? |
|
|
|
A. |
|
Each of the members of Hirschs board of directors, members
of management and their respective affiliates, have entered into
an irrevocable proxy and voting agreement with SCM, the Merger
Subs and Hirsch, providing that they will, solely in their
capacity as Hirsch shareholders, among other things, vote all of
their shares of Hirsch common stock in favor of the Merger and
the adoption of the Merger Agreement and against any other
action or agreement that is intended, or could reasonably be
expected to, impede, interfere with, delay, postpone, or
materially adversely affect the Merger or any of the other
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The Hirsch
shareholders party to the irrevocable proxy and voting agreement
also granted SCM an irrevocable proxy to vote their respective
shares of Hirsch common stock in accordance with such agreement
on their behalf. As of February 10, 2009, Hirsch
shareholders that entered into the irrevocable proxy and voting
agreement owned in the aggregate 1,021,456 shares of Hirsch
common stock, representing approximately 22% of the outstanding
shares of Hirsch common stock. For a more complete description
of the irrevocable proxy and voting agreement, see the section
entitled Certain Agreements Related to the
Merger Irrevocable Proxy and Voting Agreement
in this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus. |
v
|
|
|
Q. |
|
Are there other conditions that need to be satisfied to
consummate the Merger? |
|
A. |
|
In addition to the requirement of obtaining SCM stockholder and
Hirsch shareholder approvals, each of the other closing
conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement must be satisfied
or waived by the appropriate party. For a summary of the
conditions that need to be satisfied to consummate the Merger,
see the section entitled The Merger Agreement
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. |
|
Q. |
|
What will Hirsch shareholders receive in the Merger? |
|
A. |
|
For each share of Hirsch common stock held immediately prior to
the effective time of the Merger, the record holder of such
share will received $3.00 cash (without interest and less any
applicable withholding taxes), two shares of SCM common stock
and one warrant to purchase one share of SCM common stock at an
exercise price of $3.00, exercisable for two years following the
third anniversary of the effective time of the Merger. |
|
Q. |
|
Will the amount of cash, number of shares of SCM common stock
or number of warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
payable or issuable to Hirsch shareholders in connection with
the Merger be subject to any adjustment, for example if
SCMs stock price fluctuates? |
|
A. |
|
No. The amount of cash, number of shares of SCM common
stock and number of warrants to purchase shares of SCM common
stock to be paid or issued, or reserved for issuance in
connection with the Merger for each share of Hirsch common
stock, is fixed. |
|
Q. |
|
Will SCM common stock issued in connection with the Merger be
registered and listed on an exchange? |
|
|
|
A. |
|
Yes. The SCM common stock issued as merger consideration will be
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
will be listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol
SCMM and on the Prime Standard of the Frankfurt
Stock Exchange under the symbol SMY. The shares of
SCM common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants to
purchase SCM common stock in connection with the Merger will not
be registered on the registration statement on
Form S-4
of which this joint proxy statement/information statement is a
part. SCM intends to comply with any applicable securities
regulations and registration requirements for any such issuance
prior to the time the warrants become exercisable according to
their terms. |
|
|
|
Q. |
|
Will there be any transfer restrictions affecting the shares
of SCM common stock or warrants to purchase shares of SCM common
stock issuable to Hirsch shareholders in connection with the
Merger? |
|
A. |
|
Yes. The shares of SCM common stock to be issued to Hirsch
shareholders in connection with the Merger will be subject to a
lock-up that
prohibits Hirsch shareholders from, among other restrictions,
selling or otherwise disposing of or transferring any shares of
SCM common stock received in connection with the Merger. This
lock-up is
effective for six months from the closing date for 50% of the
SCM common stock issued to Hirsch shareholders in connection
with the Merger, and is effective for nine months from the
closing date for the remainder of the shares. Consequently, the
Hirsch shareholders will have to bear the economic risk of
holding the SCM shares for the period of the
lock-up. |
|
|
|
Subject to certain limited exceptions, the warrants to purchase
shares of SCM common stock issuable to Hirsch shareholders in
connection with the Merger will not be transferable by the
holder without the prior written consent of SCM, and will not be
listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market or otherwise publicly traded. |
|
|
|
In addition, if you will be an employee of SCM or the Surviving
Subsidiary after the closing, your shares may be subject to
SCMs insider trading policies. |
|
|
|
For more information regarding the transfer restrictions
affecting the shares of SCM common stock or warrants to purchase
shares of SCM common stock issuable to Hirsch shareholders in
connection with the Merger, see the sections entitled The
Merger Agreement
Lock-Up,
Certain Agreements Related to the Merger
Warrants, and Certain Agreements Related to the
Merger Stockholder Agreement in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. |
vi
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What is the stockholder agreement and who are the parties to
that agreement? |
|
|
|
A. |
|
Several Hirsch shareholders, including each of the members of
Hirschs board of directors, members of management and
their respective affiliates, have entered into a stockholder
agreement with SCM. Under the terms of the stockholder
agreement, the Hirsch shareholders party thereto have agreed
that for three years following the closing date of the Merger
they will not propose or enter into any acquisition transaction
or take certain other hostile actions with respect to SCM. In
addition, under the terms of the stockholder agreement, Lawrence
W. Midland and certain of his affiliates have agreed not to sell
or transfer, or otherwise dispose of the shares of SCM common
stock received in the Merger until one year after the closing
date of the Merger with respect to 33% of the shares,
18 months after the closing date with respect to 33% of the
shares, and two years after the closing date with respect to the
remaining shares. As of February 10, 2009, the shareholders
of Hirsch that entered into the stockholder agreement owned in
the aggregate 1,021,456 shares of Hirsch common stock,
representing approximately 22% of the outstanding Hirsch common
stock. For more information regarding the stockholder agreement,
see the section entitled Certain Agreements Related to the
Merger Stockholder Agreement in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. |
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What will happen to the Hirsch options? |
|
A. |
|
At the effective time of the Merger, each option to purchase
shares of Hirsch common stock outstanding and unexercised
immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will be
terminated and cancelled. For more information regarding the
treatment of the Hirsch Options, see the section entitled
The Merger Agreement Merger
Consideration Treatment of Hirsch Options and
Warrants in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus. |
|
Q. |
|
What will happen to the Hirsch warrants? |
|
A. |
|
At the effective time, each warrant to purchase shares of Hirsch
common stock outstanding and not terminated or exercised
immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will be
converted into a warrant to purchase the number of shares of SCM
common stock calculated according to the conversion ratio as
defined in the Merger Agreement. For more information regarding
the treatment of the Hirsch Warrants and the conversion ratio,
see the section entitled The Merger Agreement
Merger Consideration Treatment of Hirsch Options and
Warrants in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus. |
|
Q. |
|
Will there be any change to the shares of SCM common stock
held by SCMs stockholders? |
|
A. |
|
No. The Merger does not result in any changes to the
existing shares of SCM common stock. The current stockholders of
SCM will continue to be stockholders of SCM after the Merger. |
|
Q. |
|
Who will be the directors of SCM following the Merger? |
|
A. |
|
Immediately following the effective time of the Merger, the
board of directors of SCM is expected to be composed of the
following members: |
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Werner Koepf
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Dr. Hagen Hultzsch
|
|
Director
|
Steven Humphreys
|
|
Director
|
Dr. Hans Liebler
|
|
Director
|
Felix Marx
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Lawrence W. Midland
|
|
Executive Vice President, President of the Surviving Subsidiary
and Director
|
Stephan Rohaly
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Director
|
Simon Turner
|
|
Director
|
vii
|
|
|
Q. |
|
Who will be the executive officers of SCM immediately
following the Merger? |
|
A. |
|
Immediately following the effective time of the Merger, the
executive officers of SCM are expected to be composed of the
following members: |
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Felix Marx
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Stephan Rohaly
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
Eang Sour Chhor
|
|
Executive Vice President, Strategy, Marketing and Engineering
|
Lawrence W. Midland
|
|
Executive Vice President, Hirsch Business Division
|
Dr. Manfred Mueller
|
|
Executive Vice President, Strategic Sales and Business
Development
|
|
|
|
Q. |
|
Who will be the directors of the Surviving Subsidiary
immediately following the Merger? |
|
A. |
|
As a result of the Merger, the Surviving Subsidiary will be a
new Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of SCM. The Surviving Subsidiary will have no
directors and will be managed by SCM as the sole member. |
|
Q. |
|
Who will be the executive management of the Surviving
Subsidiary immediately following the Merger? |
|
A. |
|
Immediately following the effective time of the Merger, the
executive management team of the Surviving Subsidiary is
expected to be composed of the following members: |
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Lawrence W. Midland
|
|
President
|
Robert Beliles
|
|
Vice President of Enterprise Business Development
|
John Piccininni
|
|
Vice President of Sales
|
Robert Zivney
|
|
Vice President of Marketing
|
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the Merger to Hirsch shareholders and warrant holders? |
|
|
|
A. |
|
SCM and Hirsch have structured the Merger with the intent that
it qualify as a reorganization under Section 368 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986. If the Merger qualifies as such a
reorganization, Hirsch shareholders will recognize taxable
income as a result of the Merger equal to the lesser of
(i) the amount of cash received and (ii) the total
gain on the transaction. If the Merger qualifies as such a
reorganization, Hirsch warrant holders will not be subject to
tax as a result of the Merger. The qualification of the Merger
as a reorganization depends on numerous factors including
whether Hirsch shareholders will receive a sufficient amount of
SCM common stock to satisfy the continuity of
interest test applicable to reorganizations under
Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. Whether the Merger meets that test depends in large
part on the value of the SCM stock issued to Hirsch shareholders
as compared to the value of all consideration issued to Hirsch
shareholders. Based on an estimated valuation, the Merger should
satisfy the continuity of interest test. If, however, the
Internal Revenue Service were to challenge the valuation and
successfully contend that the Merger failed to qualify as a
reorganization, the Merger would be a fully taxable transaction
to Hirsch shareholders and warrant holders. In such case, Hirsch
shareholders and warrant holders would recognize gain or loss
measured by the difference between the value of all
consideration received by them in the Merger and their tax basis
in the Hirsch common stock and the warrants, as the case may be,
surrendered in the Merger. For additional discussion of the tax
treatment of the Merger, see the section entitled Material
United States Income Tax Consequences of the Merger in
this joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the Merger to SCM stockholders? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
SCM stockholders will not recognize a gain or loss as a result
of the Merger, whether or not the Merger qualifies as a
reorganization under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. |
viii
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Do Hirsch shareholders have appraisal or dissenters
rights in connection with the Merger? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Hirsch shareholders are entitled to exercise
dissenters rights in connection with the Merger by
complying with all of the California law procedures discussed in
the section entitled The Merger Appraisal
Rights and Dissenters Rights and in
Annex O. To exercise dissenters rights in
connection with the Merger, a Hirsch shareholder must not vote
his or her shares of Hirsch common stock in favor of the Merger
and must make a written demand to have Hirsch purchase the
shares at their fair market value. Failure to follow precisely
any of the statutory procedures set forth in Annex O
may result in the loss or waiver of dissenters rights
under California law. |
|
Q: |
|
Do SCM stockholders have appraisal or dissenters rights
in connection with the Merger? |
|
A: |
|
No. SCM stockholders do not have appraisal or
dissenters rights in connection with the issuance of the
shares of SCM common stock or warrants to purchase shares of SCM
common stock in connection with the Merger or the Merger. |
|
Q. |
|
As a SCM stockholder, how does the SCM board of directors
recommend that I vote? |
|
A. |
|
After careful consideration, the SCM board of directors
recommends that SCM stockholders vote: |
|
|
|
FOR Proposal No. 1 to approve the issuance
of the shares of SCM common stock and the warrants to purchase
shares of SCM common stock in connection with the Merger; and
|
|
|
|
FOR Proposal No. 2 to adjourn the SCM
special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if
there are not sufficient votes in favor of
Proposal No. 1.
|
|
Q. |
|
As a Hirsch shareholder, how does the Hirsch board of
directors recommend that I vote? |
|
A. |
|
After careful consideration, the Hirsch board of directors
recommends that Hirsch shareholders vote: |
|
|
|
FOR Proposal No. 1 to approve and adopt
the Merger and the Merger Agreement; and
|
|
|
|
FOR Proposal No. 2 to adjourn the Hirsch
special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if
there are not sufficient votes in favor of
Proposal No. 1.
|
|
Q. |
|
What risks should I consider in deciding how to vote? |
|
A. |
|
You should carefully read this entire joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus, including each
of the annexes, and pay specific attention to the section
entitled Risk Factors, which sets forth certain
risks and uncertainties related to the Merger and the businesses
of SCM and Hirsch. |
|
Q. |
|
When do you expect the Merger to be consummated? |
|
|
|
A. |
|
Hirsch and SCM cannot predict the exact timing of the completion
of the Merger and the related transactions. We currently
anticipate that the Merger will occur as soon as reasonably
practicable after the satisfaction or waiver by the appropriate
party of each of the closing conditions set forth in the Merger
Agreement. One of the closing conditions is that the required
approvals are obtained at the SCM special meeting to be held on
March 23, 2009 and the Hirsch special meeting to be held
March 11, 2009. For more information regarding timing, see
the section entitled The Merger Agreement
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. |
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What do SCM stockholders need to do now? |
|
A. |
|
SCM urges its stockholders to read this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus carefully,
including its annexes, and to consider how the Merger affects
them. If you are a stockholder of SCM, you are further urged to
provide your proxy instructions by mailing your signed SCM proxy
card in the enclosed return envelope or by voting by telephone
or via the Internet following the instructions on your proxy
card. Please provide your proxy instructions only once, unless
you are revoking a previously delivered proxy instruction, and
as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at the SCM
special meeting. |
ix
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What do Hirsch shareholders need to do now? |
|
A. |
|
Hirsch urges its shareholders to read this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus carefully,
including its annexes, and to consider how the Merger affects
them. If you are a shareholder of Hirsch, you are further urged
to provide your proxy instructions by mailing your Hirsch signed
proxy in the enclosed return envelope. Please provide your proxy
instructions only once, unless you are revoking a previously
delivered proxy instruction, and as soon as possible so that
your shares can be voted at the Hirsch special meeting. |
About the
SCM special meeting and the Hirsch special meeting
|
|
|
Q. |
|
When and where is the SCM special meeting of stockholders? |
|
|
|
A. |
|
The SCM special meeting will be held at SCMs U.S. office,
located at 41740 Christy Street, Fremont, California 94538, at
1:00 p.m., local time, on March 23, 2009. All SCM
stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed
proxies, may attend the SCM special meeting. |
|
|
|
Q. |
|
When and where is the Hirsch special meeting of
shareholders? |
|
|
|
A. |
|
The Hirsch special meeting will be held at Hirschs
corporate headquarters located at 1900 Carnegie Avenue,
Santa Ana, California 92705, at 7:30 p.m., local time, on
March 11, 2009. Subject to space availability, all Hirsch
shareholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed
proxies, may attend the Hirsch special meeting. Since seating
may be limited, admission to the Hirsch special meeting will be
on a first-come, first-served basis. |
|
|
|
Q. |
|
Who can attend and vote at the SCM special meeting of
stockholders? |
|
|
|
A. |
|
Only holders of record of SCM common stock at the close of
business on February 11, 2009 (the SCM record
date), are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the SCM
special meeting. As of the SCM record date, there were
15,743,515 shares of SCM common stock outstanding and entitled
to vote at the SCM special meeting, held by approximately
55 holders of record. Each holder of SCM common stock is
entitled to one vote for each share of SCM common stock owned as
of the SCM record date. |
|
|
|
Q. |
|
Who can attend and vote at the Hirsch special meeting of
shareholders? |
|
|
|
A. |
|
Only holders of record of Hirsch stock at the close of business
on February 10, 2009 (the Hirsch record date),
are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Hirsch special
meeting. As of the Hirsch record date, there were 4,705,735
shares of Hirsch stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the
Hirsch special meeting, held by approximately 315 holders
of record. Each holder of Hirsch stock is entitled to one vote
for each share of Hirsch stock owned as of the Hirsch record
date. |
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What happens if I do not return a proxy card or otherwise
provide proxy instructions, as applicable? |
|
A. |
|
If you are a SCM stockholder, the failure to return your proxy
card or otherwise provide proxy instructions or vote your shares
in person will result in your shares not being counted for
purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the SCM
special meeting. In the event that a quorum is not reached or
the necessary votes are not received, the SCM special meeting
will have to be adjourned to provide more time to obtain a
quorum and the necessary votes. |
|
|
|
If you are a Hirsch shareholder, the failure to return your
proxy or otherwise provide proxy instructions or vote your
shares in person will have the same effect as voting against
Hirsch Proposal No. 1 and your shares will not be counted
for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the
Hirsch special meeting. In the event that a quorum is not
reached or the necessary votes are not received, the Hirsch
special meeting will have to be adjourned and recalled for
another vote. |
|
Q. |
|
May I vote in person at the SCM special meeting of
stockholders? |
|
A. |
|
If your shares of SCM common stock are registered directly in
your name with the SCM transfer agent, then you are considered
to be the stockholder of record with respect to those shares,
and the proxy materials and SCM proxy card are being sent
directly to you by SCM. If you are a SCM stockholder of record,
you may attend the |
x
|
|
|
|
|
SCM special meeting and vote your shares in person. However,
even if you plan to attend the SCM special meeting in person,
SCM requests that you sign and return the enclosed SCM proxy
card or vote your shares by telephone or via the Internet to
ensure that your shares will be represented at the SCM special
meeting, if you are unable to attend. If your shares of SCM
common stock are held in a brokerage account or by another
nominee, then you are considered the beneficial owner of shares
held in street name, and the proxy materials are
being forwarded to you by your broker or other nominee together
with a voting instruction card to return to your broker or other
nominee to direct them to vote on your behalf. As the beneficial
owner, you are also invited to attend the SCM special meeting.
Because a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record,
however, you may not vote these shares in person at the SCM
special meeting unless you obtain a proxy from the broker,
trustee or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right
to vote the shares at the meeting. |
|
Q. |
|
May I vote in person at the Hirsch special meeting of
shareholders? |
|
A. |
|
If your shares of Hirsch common stock are registered directly in
your name with Hirsch, then you are considered to be the
shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and the
proxy materials and Hirsch proxy are being sent directly to you
by Hirsch. If you are a Hirsch shareholder of record, you may
attend the Hirsch special meeting and vote your shares in
person. However, even if you plan to attend the Hirsch special
meeting in person, Hirsch requests that you sign and return the
enclosed proxy to ensure that your shares will be represented at
the Hirsch special meeting. |
|
Q. |
|
If my shares are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker vote my shares for me? |
|
A. |
|
Unless your broker has discretionary authority to vote on
certain matters, your broker will not be able to vote your
shares of SCM or Hirsch stock without instructions from you.
Brokers are not expected to have discretionary authority to vote
for the SCM or Hirsch proposals, respectively. Therefore, in
order to make sure that your vote is counted, you should
instruct your broker to vote your shares following the
procedures provided by your broker. |
|
Q. |
|
May I change my vote after I have submitted a proxy or
provided proxy instructions? |
|
A. |
|
SCM stockholders of record may change their vote at any time
before their proxy is voted at the SCM special meeting in either
of the following manners: First, a stockholder of record of SCM
can send a written notice to the Secretary of SCM stating that
he or she would like to revoke his or her prior proxy
submission. Second, a stockholder of record of SCM can attend
the SCM special meeting and vote in person. Attendance alone
will not revoke a proxy. If a SCM stockholder of record or a
stockholder who owns SCM shares in street name has
instructed a broker to vote his or her shares of SCM common
stock, the stockholder must follow directions received from his
or her broker to change those instructions. |
|
|
|
Hirsch shareholders of record, other than those Hirsch
shareholders who have executed voting agreements, may change
their vote at any time before their proxy is voted at the Hirsch
special meeting in either of the following manners: First, a
shareholder of record of Hirsch can send a written notice to the
Secretary of Hirsch stating that he or she would like to revoke
his or her proxy. Second, a shareholder of record of Hirsch can
attend the Hirsch special meeting and vote in person. Attendance
alone will not revoke a proxy. |
|
Q. |
|
What should a SCM stockholder do if he or she receives more
than one set of voting materials? |
|
A. |
|
As a SCM stockholder, you may receive more than one set of
voting materials, including multiple copies of this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus and multiple SCM
proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you
hold your SCM shares in more than one brokerage account, you
will receive a separate voting instruction card for each
brokerage account in which you hold SCM shares. If you are a
holder of record and your SCM shares are registered in more than
one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. In
addition, if you are a holder of both SCM common stock and
Hirsch common stock, you will receive one or more separate proxy
cards or voting instruction cards for each company. Please
complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting
instruction card that you receive or otherwise follow the voting
instructions set forth in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus in the sections entitled The SCM
special meeting of Stockholders and The Hirsch
special meeting of Shareholders. |
xi
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What should a Hirsch shareholder do if he or she receives
more than one set of voting materials? |
|
A. |
|
As a Hirsch shareholder, you may receive more than one set of
voting materials, including multiple copies of this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus and multiple
proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you
hold your Hirsch shares in more than one brokerage account, you
will receive a separate voting instruction card for each
brokerage account in which you hold Hirsch shares. If you are a
holder of record and your Hirsch shares are registered in more
than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. In
addition, if you are a holder of both SCM common stock and
Hirsch common stock, you will receive one or more separate proxy
cards or voting instruction cards for each company. Please
complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting
instruction card that you receive or otherwise follow the voting
instructions set forth in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus in the sections entitled The SCM
special meeting of Stockholders and The Hirsch
special meeting of Shareholders. |
|
Q. |
|
Should Hirsch shareholders send in their Hirsch stock or
warrant certificates now? |
|
A. |
|
No. After the Merger is completed, Hirsch shareholders will
be sent written instructions for exchanging their Hirsch stock
and warrant certificates for the merger consideration. PLEASE
DO NOT SEND IN YOUR HIRSCH SHARE CERTIFICATES NOW OR WITH YOUR
HIRSCH PROXY CARD. |
|
Q. |
|
Who can help answer my questions? |
|
A. |
|
If you are a SCM stockholder and would like additional copies,
without charge, of this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus, or if you have questions about the
Merger, including the procedures for voting your shares, you
should contact: |
|
|
|
In the United States: |
|
|
|
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
41740 Christy Street
Fremont, CA 94538
+1
510-249-4883
ir@scmmicro.com |
|
|
|
In Europe: |
|
|
|
SCM Microsystems GmbH
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13
85737 Ismaning, Germany
+49 89
9595-5220
ir@scmmicro.com |
|
|
|
You may also request more information directly from SCMs
proxy solicitor, Georgeson, Inc. by sending an email to the
following address: scm@georgeson.com. |
|
|
|
If you are a Hirsch shareholder, and would like additional
copies, without charge, of this proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus, or if you have questions about the
Merger, including the procedures for voting your shares, you
should contact: |
|
|
|
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
1900 Carnegie Avenue, Building B
Santa Ana, California 92705
Telephone:
949-250-8888
Extension 106
Attn: Secretary |
xii
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. It does
not contain all of the information that may be important to you.
We encourage you to carefully read this entire joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus, including
annexes, and the other documents to which this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus refers, to fully
understand the merger proposals to be considered at the SCM
special meeting and the Hirsch special meeting.
Information
About SCM Microsystems and Hirsch Electronics
SCM
Microsystems, Inc.
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
41740 Christy Street
Fremont, CA 94538
+1 510-249-4883
SCM Microsystems GmbH
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13
85737 Ismaning, Germany
+49 89 9595-5220
Founded in 1990 in Munich, Germany, incorporated in Delaware in
1996 and publicly traded on both the NASDAQ Stock Market and the
Prime Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, SCM designs,
develops and sells hardware and system solutions that enable
people to conveniently and securely access digital content and
services. SCM sells its secure digital access products into two
market segments: Secure Authentication and Digital Media and
Connectivity. SCMs Secure Authentication products enable
authentication of individuals for applications such as
electronic passports and drivers licenses, electronic
healthcare cards, secure logical access to PCs and networks, and
physical access to facilities. In the Digital Media and
Connectivity market, SCM offers commercial digital media readers
that are used in digital photo kiosks to transfer digital
content to and from various flash media. SCM sells its products
to original equipment manufacturers, government contractors,
systems integrators, large enterprises, computer manufacturers,
banks, and other financial institutions.
Hirsch
Electronics Corporation
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
1900 Carnegie Avenue, Building B
Santa Ana, CA. 92705
949-250-8888
Incorporated in California in 1981, Hirsch Electronics
Corporation, a privately-held corporation, designs, engineers,
manufactures and markets software and hardware in the security
management system/physical access control market. Hirschs
business includes full-featured electronic access control
systems and a wide range of products and professional services
including enterprise-class security management systems with
integrated access control, intrusion detection, badging and
video features. Hirsch also buys and resells various security
related products, computers, peripherals and accessories. Hirsch
sells its products through a dealer/systems integrator
distribution channel. Hirsch products are sold in dozens of
countries, and the majority of sales are located in the United
States. The next most significant regions for Hirschs
business are Europe and Asia. Hirsch products are sold in every
major industry segment, with the highest number of Hirsch sales
occurring in market segments requiring a
higher-than-average
level of security effectiveness, such as government, critical
infrastructure, banking, healthcare and education.
Merger
Subs
Deer Acquisition, Inc. is a California corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM. Merger Sub 1 was formed solely
for the purposes of carrying out the Merger and it has not
conducted any business operations.
1
Hart Acquisition LLC is a Delaware limited liability company and
wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM. Merger Sub 2 was formed solely
for the purposes of carrying out the Merger and has not
conducted any business operations.
The
Merger (see page 53)
Through a two-step merger, Hirsch will become a new Delaware
limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM.
The business of Hirsch and SCM will be combined and Merger Sub 1
will merge with and into Hirsch, with Hirsch as the surviving
corporation. As soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
Hirsch will merge with and into Merger Sub 2, with Merger Sub 2
as the surviving entity.
In exchange for their shares of Hirsch common stock, Hirsch
shareholders will receive $3.00 cash (without interest and less
any applicable withholding taxes), two shares of SCM common
stock and a warrant to purchase one share of SCM common stock at
an exercise price of $3.00. Each warrant to purchase Hirsch
common stock outstanding and not terminated or exercised
immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will be
converted into a warrant to purchase shares of SCM common stock.
All options to purchase shares of Hirsch common stock
outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to the effective
time of the Merger will be terminated and cancelled.
Reasons
for the Merger (see page 56)
SCMs
Reasons for the Merger
In reaching its unanimous decision to approve the Merger, the
SCM board of directors considered a number of factors including,
among other factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the belief of the SCM board of directors that SCM after the
Merger will be better positioned to pursue and implement a
strategy focused on the concept of convergence, the much
anticipated industry trend which combines both the logical and
physical methods of access for security systems;
|
|
|
|
the fact that both companies are strong in the
U.S. government sector, but have complementary areas of
concentration;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Hirschs strength in the U.S. commercial
market is complemented by SCMs activities in the
enterprise and financial markets in Europe and Asia;
|
|
|
|
the belief that the Merger would increase SCMs revenues,
net income and internal resources and provide greater
operational scale and financial solidity; and
|
|
|
|
the results of SCMs due diligence review of Hirschs
business, finances and operations and its evaluation of
Hirschs management, competitive positions and prospects.
|
For more information regarding SCMs reasons for approving
the Merger, see the section entitled The
Merger The SCM Reasons for the Merger.
Hirschs
Reasons for the Merger
In reaching its unanimous decision to approve the Merger, the
Hirsch board of directors considered a number of factors
including, among other factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Merger will allow the Hirsch shareholders to
gain an equity interest in SCM, thus providing a vehicle for
continued participation by the Hirsch shareholders in the future
performance of not only the Surviving Subsidiary, but also of
SCM;
|
|
|
|
the increased liquidity available to Hirsch shareholders through
receipt of the cash portion of the consideration and the
registered shares of SCM;
|
|
|
|
the belief of the Hirsch board of directors that the combined
company after the Merger will be better positioned to pursue and
implement a strategy focused on the concept of convergence, the
much anticipated industry trend which combines both the logical
and physical methods of access for security systems;
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
the likelihood in the judgment of the board of directors of
Hirsch that the conditions to be satisfied prior to consummation
of the Merger transaction will be satisfied or waived; and
|
|
|
|
under the terms of the Merger Agreement, another party could
make a superior acquisition proposal which could be accepted by
the board of directors of Hirsch, and that the termination fee,
payable to SCM in such situation, would not be a significant
impediment to accepting such proposal.
|
For more information regarding Hirschs reasons for
approving the Merger, see the section entitled The
Merger The Hirsch Reasons for the Merger.
Both SCM and Hirsch believe that the Merger will be in the best
interests of their respective stockholders and shareholders.
However, achieving these anticipated benefits of the Merger is
subject to risk and uncertainty, including those risks discussed
in the section entitled Risk Factors.
Risk
Factors (see page 12)
SCM and Hirsch are subject to numerous risks associated with
their businesses and their industries. In addition, the Merger,
including the possibility that the closing of the Merger may be
delayed or not be completed at all, poses a number of unique
risks to both SCM stockholders and the Hirsch shareholders,
including the following risks:
|
|
|
|
|
SCM and Hirsch may not realize all of the anticipated benefits
of the transactions;
|
|
|
|
SCM may pay a higher price for Hirsch common stock if the value
of SCM common stock increases, because the value of the SCM
common stock issued in connection with the Merger will depend on
its market price at the time of the Merger and the exchange
ratio for the Hirsch shares of common stock at the closing of
the Merger is fixed;
|
|
|
|
the Merger may not qualify as a reorganization under
Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, in
which case the Merger may be a fully-taxable transaction to
Hirsch shareholders;
|
|
|
|
provisions of the Merger Agreement may deter alternative
business combinations;
|
|
|
|
Hirschs current shareholders will own a large percentage
of the SCM common stock after consummation of the Merger, and
will have significant influence over the outcome of corporate
actions requiring stockholder approval; and such
shareholders priorities for SCMs business may be
different from SCMs or its other stockholders;
|
|
|
|
SCM and Hirsch will incur significant transaction and
merger-related costs in connection with the Merger;
|
|
|
|
if SCM or Hirsch has to pay the termination fee, it could
negatively affect Hirschs business operations or
SCMs business operations;
|
|
|
|
the market price of SCM common stock could decline as a result
of the large number of shares that will become eligible for sale
after consummation of the Merger;
|
|
|
|
SCM may not have uncovered all the risks associated with the
acquisition of Hirsch and a significant liability may be
discovered after closing of the Merger, and the Merger Agreement
does not provide for SCMs indemnification by the former
Hirsch shareholders against any of Hirschs liabilities,
should they arise or become known after the closing of the
Merger;
|
|
|
|
directors of Hirsch have interests in the transaction that may
be different from, or in addition to, the interests of other
Hirsch shareholders, which may influence their recommendation
and vote;
|
|
|
|
there has been no public market for the Hirsch common stock and
warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock, and the lack of a
public market makes it extremely difficult to determine the fair
market value of Hirsch; and
|
|
|
|
if the conditions to the Merger are not met or waived, the
Merger will not occur.
|
3
These risks and other risks are discussed in greater detail in
the section entitled Risk Factors in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. SCM and
Hirsch encourage SCM stockholders and Hirsch shareholders to
read and consider all of these risks carefully.
Market
Price And Dividend Information (see page 51)
The closing sale price per share of SCM common stock as reported
on the NASDAQ Stock Market on December 10, 2008, the last
full trading day prior to the public announcement of entry into
the Merger Agreement was $1.27, and the closing sale price per
share of SCM common stock on February 11, 2009 (the last
practicable trading date before the filing of this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus) as reported on
the NASDAQ Stock Market was $2.67 per share. Following the
consummation of the Merger, SCMs common stock, including
the shares of SCM common stock issued in connection with the
Merger, are expected to continue to trade on the NASDAQ Stock
Market under the symbol SCMM and on the Prime
Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol
SMY.
SCM has never declared nor paid cash dividends on its capital
stock. SCM currently intends to retain earnings, if any, to
finance the growth and development of its business, and does not
expect to pay any cash dividends to its stockholders in the
foreseeable future.
There has never been, nor is there expected to be in the future,
a public market for Hirschs ordinary shares. As of
February 10, 2009, Hirsch had approximately 315
shareholders of record. Hirsch has never declared or paid any
cash dividends on its capital stock, nor does it intend to do so
in the foreseeable future.
For more information, see the section entitled Market
Price and Dividend Information.
Opinion
of the Financial Advisor of SCM (see page 64)
Avondale Partners, the financial advisor of SCM, delivered a
written opinion, dated December 9, 2008, addressed to the
board of directors of SCM, to the effect that, as of the date of
the opinion and based on and subject to various assumptions,
qualifications, and limitations described in the opinion, the
consideration to be to be paid by SCM in the Merger was fair,
from a financial point of view, to SCM. The full text of this
written opinion to the SCM board of directors, which describes,
among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed,
factors considered and limitations on the review undertaken, is
attached as Annex E to this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus. Holders of SCM
common stock are encouraged to read the opinion carefully in its
entirety.
Opinion
of Imperial Capital, LLC to the Board of Directors of Hirsch
(see page 70)
Imperial Capital, LLC rendered a written opinion to the board of
directors of Hirsch, on December 10, 2008, that, as of that
date, and based on and subject to various assumptions,
qualifications and limitations set forth in the opinion, the
Aggregate Consideration to Non-Insiders (as defined in the
opinion) was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of Hirsch common stock other than Lawrence W. Midland.
The full text of this written opinion to the Hirsch board of
directors, which describes, among other things, the assumptions
made, procedures followed, factors considered and limitations on
the review undertaken, is attached as Annex F to
this joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus.
Holders of Hirsch common stock are encouraged to read the
opinion carefully in its entirety.
Overview
of the Merger Agreement
The Merger Agreement contains the terms and conditions of the
proposed combination of the businesses of SCM and Hirsch.
Merger
Consideration
At the effective time of the Merger, each share of issued and
outstanding Hirsch common stock existing immediately prior to
the effective time of the Merger will, without any action on the
part of the shareholder thereof, automatically be retired and
cease to exist, and be converted into the right to receive $3.00
cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding
taxes, two shares of SCM common stock, and a warrant to purchase
one share of SCM common stock at an exercise price of $3.00;
provided that the following shares will not be so converted:
|
|
|
|
|
shares owned by SCM or the Merger Subs;
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
shares held by Hirsch; and
|
|
|
|
shares which are held by shareholders properly demanding and
perfecting dissenters rights pursuant to
Sections 1300-1313
of the California Corporations Code.
|
At the effective time, each option to purchase shares of Hirsch
common stock outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to
the effective time of the Merger will be terminated and
cancelled, and neither SCM, the Merger Subs, nor the Surviving
Subsidiary will assume or be bound by any obligation with
respect to such options.
At the effective time of the Merger, each warrant to purchase
shares of Hirsch common stock outstanding and not terminated or
exercised immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger
will be converted into a warrant to purchase the number of
shares of SCM common stock equal to the number of shares of
Hirsch common stock that could have been purchased upon the full
exercise of such warrant, multiplied by a conversion ratio,
rounded down to the nearest whole share. The per share exercise
price for each new warrant to purchase SCM common stock issued
in exchange for existing warrants to purchase Hirsch common
stock will be determined by dividing the per share exercise
price of the Hirsch common stock subject to each warrant as in
effect immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger by
the conversion ratio, and rounding that result up to the nearest
cent. As used in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus, the term conversion ratio
means the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate value of
the merger consideration per share, by the volume weighted
average price of SCMs common stock (as reported on the
NASDAQ Stock Market) during the 30 days preceding the day
prior to the day of the effective time of the Merger. For a more
complete description of the merger consideration, see the
section entitled The Merger Agreement Merger
Consideration in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
The merger consideration and conversion ratio will be
appropriately and proportionately adjusted to reflect any stock
dividend, subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization,
split, combination, or exchange of shares with respect to SCM
common stock between the date of the Merger Agreement and the
effective time of the Merger.
Lock-up
Provisions
The Merger Agreement provides that each Hirsch shareholder will
be prohibited during the period beginning on the closing date of
the Merger and continuing until the six month anniversary of the
closing date from, among other restrictions, directly or
indirectly, selling any shares of SCM common stock received in
the Merger. During the period commencing on the day after the
six month anniversary of the closing date and ending the on date
of the nine month anniversary of the closing date, a Hirsch
shareholder may sell or transfer only up to 50% of the SCM
common stock received by such Hirsch shareholder in connection
with the Merger.
No
Solicitation
With certain exceptions, Hirsch and SCM agreed that immediately
following the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement,
each of the parties and their subsidiaries would cease any and
all existing activities, discussions, or negotiations with any
person relating to any acquisition proposals. The parties
further agreed that until the earlier of the termination of the
Merger Agreement and the effective time of the Merger neither
Hirsch nor SCM may, nor may any of their respective
representatives or affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, encourage, seek, entertain, support, assist, initiate
or participate in any inquiry, negotiations or discussions, or
enter into any agreement, with respect to any acquisition
proposal;
|
|
|
|
disclose or furnish any information in connection with an
acquisition proposal concerning the business, technologies or
properties of either Hirsch or SCM, or any of their respective
subsidiaries, or afford access to its properties, technologies,
books or records, in connection with an acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
approve, endorse or recommend an acquisition proposal relating
to Hirsch or SCM, respectively;
|
|
|
|
enter into any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding or
other contract contemplating or otherwise relating to an
acquisition proposal relating to Hirsch or SCM,
respectively; or
|
|
|
|
terminate, amend or waive any rights under any
standstill or other similar contract between it or
any of its subsidiaries and any person (other than the other
party to the Merger Agreement).
|
5
For a more complete discussion of the exclusivity provisions and
permitted acquisition proposals, see the sections entitled
The Merger Agreement Certain Covenants of both
SCM and Hirsch Exclusivity, The Merger
Agreement Certain Covenants of both SCM and
Hirsch SCM Acquisition Proposals, and
The Merger Agreement Certain Covenants of both
SCM and Hirsch Hirsch Acquisition Proposals.
Conditions
to Completion of the Merger
In addition to the requirement of obtaining SCM stockholder
approval and Hirsch shareholder approval, each of the other
closing conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement must be
satisfied or waived by the appropriate party. For a summary of
the conditions that need to be satisfied to consummate the
Merger, see the section entitled The Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Completion of the
Merger in this joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
It is possible that the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement will not be completed. This
might happen if, for example, SCMs stockholders do not
approve the issuance of the SCM shares and warrants in
connection with the Merger, or if Hirschs shareholders do
not approve the Merger or if other conditions to the Merger are
not satisfied. Should that occur, neither SCM nor Hirsch will be
under any obligation to make or consider any alternative
proposal regarding the combination of SCM and Hirsch. For a more
complete discussion of the manners in which the Merger Agreement
may terminate, see the section entitled The Merger
Agreement Termination in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus.
Termination
Fee
In certain circumstances, SCM or Hirsch may be obligated to pay
the other party a termination fee of $1.5 million, plus an
amount equal to all
out-of-pocket
expenses (excluding the cost of employee time) incurred by the
recipient party in connection with the Merger Agreement, the
ancillary agreements, and the transactions contemplated thereby.
For a more complete discussion of the termination fee, see the
section entitled The Merger Agreement
Termination in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
Irrevocable
Proxy and Voting Agreement
As of the record date for the Hirsch special meeting, Hirsch
shareholders that owned in the aggregate 1,021,456 shares
of Hirsch common stock, representing approximately 22% of the
outstanding shares of Hirsch common stock as of the record date
for the Hirsch special meeting, had entered into the irrevocable
proxy and voting agreement.
The Hirsch shareholders who are parties to the irrevocable proxy
and voting agreement have agreed, solely in their capacity as
Hirsch shareholders and among other things, to vote all of their
shares of Hirsch common stock in favor of the Merger and the
adoption of the Merger Agreement, against any other Hirsch
acquisition proposals, against any action or agreement that
would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of the Merger
Agreement by Hirsch, against any change in a majority of the
individuals serving on the Hirsch board of directors as of the
date of the signing of the Merger Agreement (subject to certain
exceptions), and against any other action or agreement which is
intended, or could reasonably be expected to, impede, interfere
with, delay, postpone, or materially adversely affect the Merger
or any of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement. The Hirsch shareholders that are parties to the
irrevocable proxy and voting agreement also granted SCM an
irrevocable proxy to vote their respective Hirsch common stock
in accordance with the terms of the irrevocable proxy and voting
agreement. A copy of the irrevocable proxy and voting agreement
is attached as Annex B to this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus.
Stockholder
Agreement (see page 113)
As of the record date for the Hirsch special meeting, Hirsch
shareholders that owned in the aggregate 1,021,456 shares
of Hirsch common stock, representing approximately 22% of the
outstanding shares of Hirsch common stock as of the record date
for the Hirsch special meeting had entered into the stockholder
agreement. A
6
brief summary of some of the material provisions of the
stockholder agreements are included below, and a copy of the
stockholder agreement is attached as Annex C to this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus.
Standstill
Provision
The stockholder agreement includes a standstill provision
whereby the Hirsch shareholders who are parties to the
stockholder agreement agreed to a three-year
standstill period beginning on the closing date of
the Merger. During the standstill period, such parties agreed
that, subject to limited circumstances, they would not take
certain actions that could be hostile to SCM, including without
limitation proposing or entering into any acquisition
transaction with a third party with respect to SCM, acquiring
shares of SCM common stock that would result in such stockholder
holding more than 10% of SCMs outstanding shares,
participating in or encouraging the solicitation of proxies with
respect to SCM securities or the securities of its subsidiaries,
participating in or encouraging the formation of any group which
owns, seeks, or offers to acquire beneficial ownership of
SCMs voting securities or which seeks to control SCM, or
otherwise act alone or in concert with others seeking or
offering to control or influence the management of SCMs
board of directors or the policies of SCM or its subsidiaries.
Lock-Up
Agreement
Lawrence W. Midland and his controlled affiliates have agreed to
a more restrictive
lock-up
arrangement than other Hirsch shareholders with respect to the
shares of SCM common stock and warrants to purchase shares of
SCM common stock issued in connection with the Merger.
Specifically, except in limited circumstances, Mr. Midland
and his affiliates are prohibited from selling or transferring,
or granting or lending or otherwise disposing of, such
securities for up to 24 months following the closing date
of the Merger. As of the record date for the Hirsch special
meeting, Lawrence W. Midland and his controlled affiliates
beneficially owned in the aggregate 628,800 shares of
Hirsch common stock, representing approximately 13% of the
outstanding Hirsch common stock as of the record date for the
Hirsch special meeting. For a more complete discussion of the
lock-up
agreement, see the section entitled Certain Agreements
Related to the Merger Stockholder
Agreement
Lock-Up
Agreement.
Agreement
to Vote; Election of Directors
The stockholder agreement includes a provision whereby the
Hirsch shareholders who are parties to the stockholder agreement
agreed that for a period of three years after the closing date
of the Merger, subject to limited circumstances relating to
Lawrence W. Midlands status as a director on SCMs
board of directors, they will vote all shares of SCM common
stock owned by them to elect any director nominee that is
recommended by the majority of SCMs board of directors,
remove any director if such removal is requested or approved by
a majority of SCMs board of directors or the SCM
nominating committee, or oppose the removal or any director
unless such removal is approved by a majority of SCMs
board of directors. The stockholders also granted SCM an
irrevocable proxy to vote their respective SCM common stock in
accordance with the stockholder agreement.
Interests
of Directors, Executive Officers and Affiliates of SCM and
Hirsch (see page 78)
Hirsch
In considering the recommendation of the Hirsch board of
directors with respect to adopting the Merger Agreement, Hirsch
shareholders should be aware that certain members of the Hirsch
board of directors and certain executive officers of Hirsch have
interests in the Merger that may be different from, or in
addition to, interests they may have as Hirsch shareholders. For
example:
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the Merger, the executive officers of Hirsch
have entered into employment agreements with Hirsch to become
effective at the closing of the Merger, including salary, bonus,
severance and other benefit provisions. For a more detailed
discussion of the employment agreements with the Hirsch
executive officers, see the section entitled Certain
Agreements Related to the Merger Employment
Agreements with Hirsch Executive Officers in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus.
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence W. Midland, a Hirsch director and the President of
Hirsch, will be appointed to the SCM board of directors
immediately following the effective time of the Merger.
|
|
|
|
Upon consummation of the Merger, SCM will issue warrants to
purchase shares of SCM common stock to each of Hirschs
outside directors in 2008, with the number of shares subject to
the warrants to be determined based on the conversion ratio
under the Merger Agreement of warrants to purchase
3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock.
|
|
|
|
Three current directors of Hirsch hold partnership interests in
Secure Keyboards, Ltd. (Keyboards)
and/or
Secure Networks, Ltd. (Networks), which are parties
to a settlement agreement with Hirsch that provides for Hirsch
to pay royalties based on Hirsch gross revenues to Secure
Keyboards, Ltd. until December 31, 2020 and to Secure
Networks, Ltd. until December 31, 2011. To the extent that
consummation of the Merger results in an increased in the amount
of Hirsch revenues, the amount of royalties payable under the
settlement agreement will increase. In connection with the entry
into the Merger Agreement, two of the four general partners of
Secure Keyboards, Ltd. delivered a letter of understanding to
SCM. In addition, the two general partners of Secure Networks,
Ltd., delivered a substantially similar letter of understanding
to SCM. Each letter of understanding contained certain
clarifications of the SCM and Hirsch business relationship and
its resulting impact on the companies respective revenue
streams and on Keyboards or Networks revenue base,
as applicable. For a more detailed discussion of the settlement
agreement see the section entitled Certain Agreements
Related to the Merger Settlement Agreement and
Certain Agreements Related to the
Merger Keyboards and Networks Letters of
Understanding in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
|
|
|
|
Hirsch purchased the outstanding shares of capital stock of
Hirsch EMEA, Inc., a British Virgin Island corporation, which is
now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hirsch. One of the parties from
which Hirsch purchased shares of Hirsch EMEA, Inc. was tSecu,
LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company which is an
affiliate of Ayman Ashour, a former director of Hirsch. For a
more detailed discussion of the Hirsch EMEA purchase, see the
sections entitled Certain Agreements Related to the
Merger Settlement Agreement and Certain
Agreements Related to the Merger Hirsch EMEA, Inc.
Stock Purchase in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
|
|
|
|
For a period of three years following the effective time of the
Merger, and to the extent of insurance coverage, for three
additional years, the surviving entity of the Merger will, to
the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify and hold harmless
the Hirsch directors and officers serving as of the date of the
Merger Agreement; and for a period of six years following the
effective time of the Merger, the surviving entity of the Merger
will maintain, in effect, a directors and officers
liability insurance policy covering the directors and officers
of Hirsch, with coverage in amount and scope at least as
favorable as the coverage under the existing Hirsch policy at
the time the Merger becomes effective up to an aggregate premium
for such policy of $50,000.
|
As of the record date for the Hirsch special meeting, the
directors and executive officers of Hirsch, together with their
affiliates, owned in the aggregate approximately
1,021,456 shares of Hirsch common stock, entitling them to
exercise approximately 22% of the voting power of the Hirsch
common stock at the Hirsch special meeting. Hirsch cannot
complete the Merger unless the Merger is approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
Hirsch common stock as of the record date for the Hirsch special
meeting.
As of the record date for the Hirsch special meeting, the
directors and executive officers of Hirsch, together with their
affiliates, held in the aggregate options and warrants to
purchase approximately 57,000 shares of Hirsch common
stock. These options and warrants and any shares of Hirsch
common stock issued upon the exercise thereof between the record
date will not be entitled to vote at the Hirsch special meeting.
SCM
No director or executive officer of SCM since December 31,
2007, nor their affiliates, have any interests in the Merger
that differ from, or are in addition to, their interests as SCM
stockholders. As of the record date for the SCM special meeting,
the directors and executive officers of SCM, together with their
affiliates, owned in the aggregate
8
approximately 1,683,452 shares of SCM common stock,
entitling them to exercise approximately 11% of the voting power
of the SCM common stock at the SCM special meeting. SCM cannot
complete the Merger unless the issuance of the shares of SCM
common stock and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
in connection with the Merger is approved by the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of SCM common
stock voting at the SCM special meeting.
In addition, as of the record date for the SCM special meeting,
the directors and executive officers of SCM, together with their
affiliates, held in the aggregate options to purchase
approximately 773,176 shares of SCM common stock. These
options and any shares of SCM common stock issued upon the
exercise thereof will not be entitled to vote at the SCM special
meeting.
Ownership
of SCM Following the Merger (see page 88)
After the Merger, Hirsch will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of
SCM, and Hirsch shareholders will no longer have any direct
interest in Hirsch, but will have an equity stake in SCM, the
new company of Hirschs operations. Immediately after the
Merger, existing SCM stockholders are expected to own
approximately 63% of the outstanding shares of SCM common stock
and the former Hirsch shareholders are expected to own
approximately 37% of the outstanding shares of SCM common stock.
For a more complete discussion of ownership of SCM after the
Merger, see the section entitled The Merger
Ownership of SCM Following the Merger.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (see
page 89)
SCM and Hirsch have structured the Merger with the intent that
it qualify as a reorganization under
Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and it is a closing condition to the Merger that the
parties receive an opinion of counsel regarding such
qualification. If the Merger qualifies as such a reorganization,
Hirsch shareholders will recognize taxable income as a result of
the Merger equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of cash
received and (ii) the total gain realized on the
transaction. If the Merger qualifies as such a reorganization,
Hirsch warrant holders will not be subject to tax as a result of
the Merger. The qualification of the Merger as a reorganization
depends on numerous factors including whether Hirsch
shareholders will receive a sufficient amount of SCM common
stock to satisfy the continuity of interest test
applicable to reorganizations under Section 368 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Whether the Merger
meets that test depends in large part on the value of the SCM
stock issued to Hirsch shareholders as compared to the value of
all consideration (i.e., cash, stock and warrants) issued to
Hirsch shareholders. If, however, the Internal Revenue Service
were to challenge the valuation and successfully contend that
the Merger failed to qualify as a reorganization, the Merger
would be a fully taxable transaction to Hirsch shareholders and
Hirsch warrant holders. In such case, Hirsch shareholders and
Hirsch warrant holders would recognize gain or loss measured by
the difference between the value of all consideration received
by them in the Merger and their tax basis in the Hirsch common
stock and warrants, as the case may be, surrendered in the
Merger. SCM stockholders will not recognize gain or loss as a
result of the Merger, whether or not the Merger qualifies as a
reorganization under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. Neither SCM nor Hirsch will recognize
gain or loss as a result of the Merger, except for any gain that
might arise if SCM pays cash or property to Hirsch in connection
with these transactions and such cash or property is not
distributed to Hirsch shareholders. SCM does not expect any such
gain to be material.
The second-step merger is intended to be treated, along with the
first merger, as one integrated transaction for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, and SCM and Hirsch do not
expect any further tax consequences to the SCM stockholders or
the Hirsch shareholders, other than those described above.
Tax matters are very complicated, and the tax consequences of
the Merger to a particular Hirsch shareholder or warrant holder
will depend in part on such shareholders or warrant
holders circumstances and jurisdiction. Accordingly,
Hirsch shareholders and warrant holders should consult their tax
advisors for a full understanding of the tax consequences of the
Merger, including the applicability and effect of federal,
state, local and foreign income and other tax laws. For
additional discussion of the tax treatment of the Merger, see
the section entitled Material United States Income Tax
Consequences of the Merger in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus.
9
Regulatory
Approvals (see page 203)
In the United States, SCM must comply with applicable federal
and state securities laws and the rules and regulations of the
NASDAQ Global Market in connection with the issuance of shares
of SCM common stock and warrants to purchase shares of SCM
common stock, and the filing of this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus with the SEC. In
Germany SCM must comply with the applicable laws and regulations
related to the issuance of shares of SCM common stock and the
filing of a prospectus with the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
NASDAQ
Stock Market Listing (see page 87)
Prior to consummation of the Merger, SCM intends to cause all
shares of SCM common stock to be issued in connection with the
Merger and all shares of SCM common stock to be issued upon
exercise of the warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
to be approved for listing (subject to notice of issuance) on
the NASDAQ Stock Market and the Prime Standard of the Frankfurt
Stock Exchange as of the effective time of the Merger, including
filing any required additional listing applications or notices
with the NASDAQ Stock Market pursuant to NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
rules.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment (see page 88)
SCM will account for the acquisition of Hirsch as a purchase of
the business, which means that the assets and liabilities of
Hirsch will be recorded at their fair value and the results of
operations of Hirsch will be included in SCMs results from
and after the effective time of the Merger, in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standard No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations.
Appraisal
Rights and Dissenters Rights (see page 42)
SCM stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights in
connection with the Merger under Delaware General Corporation
Law. Hirsch shareholders are entitled to appraisal rights in
connection with the Merger under California law. For more
information about such rights, see the provisions of
Sections 1300 through 1313 of Chapter 13 of the
California Corporations Code, attached hereto as
Annex O, and the section entitled The
Merger Appraisal Rights and Dissenters
Rights in this joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus.
Failure to follow precisely any of the statutory procedures set
forth in Annex O may result in the loss or waiver of
dissenters rights under California law.
SCM
Microsystems Director and Executive Officer Compensation (see
page 174)
SCM currently anticipates that Werner Koepf, Dr. Hagen
Hultzsch, Steven Humphreys, Dr. Hans Liebler, Felix Marx,
Lawrence W. Midland, Stephan Rohaly, and Simon Turner will serve
as its board of directors following completion of the Merger.
For a complete discussion of the expected board of directors
following the Merger, compensation of directors, and
compensation of executives, see the section entitled SCM
Microsystems Director and Executive Officer Compensation.
Comparison
of Stockholder Rights (see page 198)
The rights of Hirsch shareholders are currently governed by the
California Corporations Code, Hirschs articles of
incorporation, as amended, and the bylaws of Hirsch. The rights
of SCM stockholders are currently governed by the Delaware
General Corporation Law, the Fourth Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of SCM, and the bylaws of SCM. If
the Merger is completed, Hirsch shareholders will become
stockholders of SCM, and their rights will be governed by the
Delaware General Corporation Law, and the certificate of
incorporation of SCM and bylaws of SCM. The rights of Hirsch
shareholders contained in the articles of incorporation and
bylaws of Hirsch differ from the rights of SCM stockholders
under the certificate of incorporation of SCM and bylaws of SCM,
as more fully described under the section entitled
Comparison of SCM Microsystems
10
Stockholders and Hirsch Electronics Shareholders Rights and
Corporate Governance Matters in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus.
The SCM
Special Meeting Of Stockholders (see page 207)
The SCM special meeting will be held at SCMs United States
office, located at 41740 Christy Street, Fremont, California
94538, at 1:00 p.m., local time, on March 23, 2009.
Only holders of record of SCM common stock at the close of
business on February 11, 2009 (the SCM record
date) are entitled to notice of, attendance at and to vote
at, the SCM special meeting. As of the record date for the SCM
special meeting, there were 15,743,515 shares of SCM common
stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the SCM special
meeting, held by approximately 55 holders of record. Each holder
of SCM common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of
SCM common stock owned as of the SCM record date.
There are two proposals at the SCM special meeting. The first
proposal at the SCM special meeting is a proposal to approve the
issuance of new shares of SCM common stock, par value $0.001 per
share, and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock, to
securityholders of Hirsch, in connection with Merger. The second
proposal at the SCM special meeting is a proposal to consider
and vote upon an adjournment of the SCM special meeting, if
necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes in favor of the first proposal described
immediately above. If you are a SCM stockholder and fail to
return your proxy card or otherwise provide proxy instructions
or vote your shares in person will result in your shares not
being counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is
present at the SCM special meeting. In the event that a quorum
is not reached or the necessary votes are not received, the SCM
special meeting will have to be adjourned and recalled to obtain
a quorum and the necessary votes.
The
Hirsch Special Meeting Of Shareholders (see
page 211)
The Hirsch special meeting will be held at Hirschs
Corporate Headquarters, 1900 Carnegie Avenue, Building B, Santa
Ana, California 92705, at 7:30 p.m., local time, on
March 11, 2009. Only holders of record of Hirsch stock at
the close of business on February 10, 2009 are entitled to
notice of, attendance at and to vote at the Hirsch special
meeting. As of the record date for the Hirsch special meeting,
there were 4,705,735 shares of Hirsch stock outstanding and
entitled to vote at the Hirsch special meeting, held by
approximately 315 holders of record. Each holder of Hirsch
stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Hirsch stock
owned as of the Hirsch record date.
There are two proposals at the Hirsch special meeting. The first
proposal at the Hirsch special meeting is a proposal to adopt
the Merger Agreement. The second proposal at the Hirsch special
meeting is a proposal to consider and vote upon an adjournment
of the Hirsch special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is
present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes in favor of the proposal described immediately
above to satisfy each of the conditions to closing concerning
the vote set forth in the Merger Agreement. If you are a Hirsch
shareholder, the failure to return your proxy or otherwise
provide proxy instructions or vote your shares in person will
have the same effect as voting against Hirsch Proposal No.
1 and your shares will not be counted for purposes of
determining whether a quorum is present at the Hirsch special
meeting. In the event that a quorum is not reached or the
necessary votes are not received, the Hirsch special meeting
will have to be adjourned and recalled for another vote.
11
RISK
FACTORS
The Merger involves risks for SCM stockholders and Hirsch
shareholders. SCM stockholders will be choosing to permit
significant dilution of their percentage ownership of SCM by
voting in favor of the issuance of additional shares of SCM
Common Stock and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
in order to complete the Merger. Hirsch shareholders will be
choosing to no longer control 100% of Hirsch and to become
stockholders of SCM by voting in favor of the Merger. In
addition to the risks that their respective businesses currently
face, after the Merger, SCM and the Surviving Subsidiary will be
faced with a market environment that cannot be predicted and
that involves significant risks, many of which will be beyond
their control. These risk factors are not intended to represent
a complete list of the general or specific risk factors that may
affect SCM, Hirsch and the combined business, and these risk
factors may not be exhaustive. You should carefully consider the
risks described below and the other information contained in
this joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus,
including the matters addressed in the section entitled
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements, before deciding how to vote your shares of
common stock.
Risks
Relating to the Merger
SCM
and Hirsch may not realize all of the anticipated benefits of
the transactions.
To be successful after the Merger, SCM and Hirsch will need to
combine and integrate the businesses and operations of their
separate companies. The combination of two independent companies
is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. As a result,
after the Merger, the combined company will be required to
devote significant management attention and resources to
integrating the diverse business practices and operations of SCM
and Hirsch. The integration process may divert the attention of
the combined companys executive officers and management
from
day-to-day
operations and disrupt the business of either or both of the
companies and, if implemented ineffectively, preclude
realization of the full benefits of the transaction expected by
SCM and Hirsch. SCM has not recently completed a merger or
acquisition comparable in size or scope to the transaction. The
failure of the combined company, after the Merger, to meet the
challenges involved in successfully integrating the operations
of SCM and Hirsch or otherwise to realize any of the anticipated
benefits of the Merger could cause an interruption of, or a loss
of momentum in, the activities of the combined company and could
adversely affect its results of operations. In addition, the
overall integration of the two companies may result in
unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive
responses and loss of customer relationships, and may cause
SCMs stock price to decline. The difficulties of combining
the operations of the companies include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees;
|
|
|
|
preserving important strategic and customer relationships;
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from ongoing
business concerns;
|
|
|
|
coordinating geographically separate organizations;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated issues in integrating information, communications
and other systems;
|
|
|
|
coordinating marketing functions;
|
|
|
|
consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures and
eliminating duplicative operations; and
|
|
|
|
integrating the cultures of SCM and Hirsch.
|
In addition, even if the businesses and operations of SCM and
Hirsch are integrated successfully, the combined company may not
fully realize the expected benefits of the Merger, including
sales or growth opportunities that were anticipated, within the
intended time frame, or at all. Further, because the businesses
of SCM and Hirsch differ, the results of operations of the
combined company and the market price of SCM common stock after
the Merger may be affected by factors different from those
existing prior to the Merger and may suffer as a result of the
Merger. As a result, SCM and Hirsch cannot assure you that the
combination of the businesses and operations of SCM with Hirsch
will result in the realization of the full benefits anticipated
from the Merger.
12
Provisions
of the Merger Agreement may deter alternative business
combinations.
Restrictions in the Merger Agreement prohibit, in certain
contexts, SCM and Hirsch from soliciting any acquisition
proposal or offer for a merger or business combination with any
other party, including a proposal that could be advantageous to
the stockholders of SCM or shareholders of Hirsch when compared
to the terms and conditions of the Merger described in this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. In
addition, if the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain
specified circumstances relating to effecting a business
combination with a different party, SCM or Hirsch may be
required to pay the other a termination fee of
$1.5 million, plus an amount equal to all
out-of-pocket
expenses (excluding the cost of employee time) incurred by the
recipient party in connection with the Merger Agreement, the
ancillary agreements, and the transactions contemplated thereby.
These provisions may deter third parties from proposing or
pursuing alternative business combinations that could result in
greater value to SCM stockholders or Hirsch shareholders than
the Merger.
There
has been no public market for the Hirsch common stock and
warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock, and the lack of a
public market makes it extremely difficult to determine the fair
market value of Hirsch .
The outstanding capital stock of Hirsch is privately held and is
not traded in any public market. The lack of a public market
makes it extremely difficult to determine the fair market value
of Hirsch. The number of shares of SCM common stock and warrants
to purchase SCM common stock to be issued to Hirsch shareholders
was determined based on negotiations between the parties, and it
may not be indicative of the price of the Hirsch common stock
and warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock may have traded at
if they were traded in a public market.
The
amount of merger consideration is fixed and not subject to
adjustment based on the market price of SCM common
stock.
The merger consideration to be received by the holders of the
shares of Hirsch common stock in the Merger includes shares of
SCM common stock and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common
stock. The Merger Agreement does not include an exchange ratio
or adjustment mechanism based on the market price of SCM common
stock for the determination of the amount of merger
consideration that will be paid.
The
value of the SCM common stock issued in the Merger will depend
on its market price at the time of the Merger, as the exchange
ratio for the Hirsch shares of common stock at the closing of
the Merger is fixed.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the exchange ratio used to
determine the number of shares of SCMs common stock that
Hirsch shareholders will receive is unaffected by the share
price of SCMs common stock, as reflected on the NASDAQ
Stock Market. Increases in the value of SCM common stock will
result in a higher price being paid by SCM for Hirsch common
stock and more value received by Hirsch shareholders in the
Merger. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, SCM will not have the
right to terminate or renegotiate the Merger Agreement or to
re-solicit proxies as a result of any increase in the value of
SCMs outstanding common stock.
SCM
common stock has historically traded at a very low volume. If
substantial amounts of SCM common stock begin to trade on the
open market following the end of the
lock-up
period, the price of SCM common stock may be materially and
adversely affected.
If the current Hirsch shareholders sell, or it is perceived that
they will sell, substantial amounts of SCM common stock in the
public market after the
lock-up
lapses, the trading price of SCM common stock could be
materially and adversely affected.
The
market price of SCM common stock could decline as a result of
the large number of shares that will become eligible for sale
after consummation of the Merger.
If the Merger is consummated, the new shares of SCM common stock
issued as merger consideration will become saleable beginning
six months after the closing of the Merger and the warrants to
purchases shares of SCM common stock will be exercisable for two
years following the third anniversary of the effective time of
the Merger. Consequently, after such periods, a substantial
number of additional shares of SCM common stock will be eligible
13
for resale in the public market. Current stockholders of SCM and
former shareholders of Hirsch may not wish to continue to invest
in the operations of the combined company after the Merger, or
for other reasons, may wish to dispose of some or all of their
interests in SCM after the Merger. Sales of substantial numbers
of shares of both the newly issued and the existing SCM common
stock in the public market following the Merger could adversely
affect the market price of such shares.
The
issuance of shares of SCM common stock to Hirsch shareholders in
connection with the Merger will substantially reduce the
percentage ownership of current SCM stockholders.
If the transaction is completed, SCM and Hirsch expect that,
based on shares of Hirsch common stock outstanding as of
February 10, 2009, and assuming no options or warrants to
purchase shares of Hirsch common stock are exercised prior to
close, SCM will pay, in the aggregate, approximately
$14.1 million in cash and issue approximately
9,411,470 shares of SCM common stock, and warrants to
purchase an additional 4,705,735 shares of SCM common
stock, as consideration for the outstanding shares of Hirsch
common stock. Following the Merger, current holders of Hirsch
stock are expected to own approximately 37% of the shares of SCM
common stock outstanding after the Merger and current holders of
SCM stock are expected to own approximately 63% of the shares of
SCM common stock outstanding after the Merger. SCM stockholders
will continue to own their existing shares of SCM common stock,
which will not be affected by the Merger, other than by the
dilution resulting from the issuance of the merger consideration
described above. In addition, based on the number of warrants to
purchase shares of Hirsch common stock outstanding as of
February 10, 2009 and excluding the warrants to be issued
by SCM to Hirsch directors for service in 2008, SCM estimates
that it will issue warrants to purchase an additional
164,618 shares of SCM common stock to the holders of Hirsch
warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock, in connection with the
Merger. Additionally, if all of the existing options and
warrants to purchase shares of Hirsch common stock outstanding
as of February 10, 2009 were exercised prior to the
effective time of the Merger, SCM estimates that it will issue
up to an additional $375,000 in cash, 250,000 shares of SCM
common stock and warrants to purchase 125,000 shares of SCM
common stock to current holders of Hirsch options as merger
consideration. The issuance of the shares of SCM common stock
and warrants to purchase SCM common stock described above will
cause a significant reduction in the relative percentage
interests of current SCM stockholders in earnings, voting, and
liquidation, book and market value.
Hirschs
current shareholders will own a large percentage of the SCM
common stock after consummation of the Merger, and will have
significant influence over the outcome of corporate actions
requiring stockholder approval; such shareholders
priorities for SCMs business may be different from
SCMs or its other stockholders.
After completion of the Merger, the former Hirsch shareholders
will beneficially own approximately 37% of the outstanding SCM
common stock and the current SCM stockholders will beneficially
own approximately 63% of the SCM common stock. Accordingly, such
former Hirsch shareholders will be able to significantly
influence the outcome of any corporate transaction or other
matter submitted to the SCM stockholders for approval, including
the election of directors, any merger, consolidation or sale of
all or substantially all of SCMs assets or any other
significant corporate transaction, such that such former
shareholders of Hirsch could delay or prevent a change of
control of SCM, even if such a change of control would benefit
SCMs other stockholders. The interests of such former
Hirsch shareholders may differ from the interests of other
stockholders.
Hirsch
shareholders will no longer exercise 100% control over
Hirsch.
The Hirsch shareholders currently own and control 100% of
Hirsch. Upon the closing of the Merger, Hirsch shareholders will
become SCM stockholders and, consequently, will no longer
control Hirsch. Hirsch will be transformed into a wholly-owned
subsidiary of SCM and will be controlled by SCM. The former
Hirsch shareholders will own 37% of the outstanding SCM common
stock after the Merger.
14
The
shares of SCM common stock to be received by Hirsch shareholders
as a result of the Merger will have different rights from the
shares of Hirsch common stock.
Upon completion of the Merger, Hirsch shareholders will become
SCM stockholders and their rights as stockholders will be
governed by SCMs certificate of incorporation and
SCMs bylaws and Delaware law. The rights associated with
Hirsch common stock are different from the rights associated
with SCM common stock. Furthermore, the rights of SCM
stockholders are governed by Delaware law, rather than
California law. Delaware law differs from California law,
including, among other things, the laws regarding appraisal
rights and shareholder voting requirements. After the Merger,
Hirsch shareholders will become SCM stockholders and will have
rights that are different from those they have now as Hirsch
shareholders. See the section entitled Comparison of
Stockholders Rights and Corporate Governance Matters for a
discussion of the different rights associated with SCM common
stock and Hirsch common stock.
The
SCM warrants to be issued in connection with the Merger will
have limited transferability and will only be exercisable for a
period of two years following the third anniversary of the
closing.
The warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock to be issued
in connection with the Merger will not be freely transferable
and will not be listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market or otherwise
publicly traded. Further, the warrants cannot be exercised for a
period of three years following the closing of the Merger and
only have a five year term. There is no guarantee that the
warrants will be
in-the-money
at any point during the two-year period of exercisability
beginning on the third anniversary of the closing of the Merger.
Consequently, the Hirsch shareholders will have to bear the
economic risk of holding the warrants to purchase shares of SCM
common stock during the three year period following the closing
of the Merger.
The
shares of SCM common stock issuable upon the exercise of the
warrants to purchase SCM common stock in connection with the
Merger will not be registered on the registration statement on
Form S-4
of which this joint proxy statement/information statement is a
part; if SCM is unable to comply with any applicable
registration requirements prior to the time of exercise, SCM may
not issue such shares.
The shares of SCM common stock issuable upon the exercise of the
warrants to purchase SCM common stock in connection with the
Merger will not be registered on the registration statement on
Form S-4
of which this joint proxy statement/information statement is a
part. Although SCM intends to comply with any applicable
securities regulations and registration requirements for any
such issuance prior to the time the warrants become exercisable
according to their terms, if for any reason required
registration is not available or effective, SCM will not be able
to issue the shares of common stock upon any attempted exercise
of warrants, until such time as applicable registration
requirements are complied with or an exception therefrom is
available.
Hirsch
shareholders will bear the economic risk of holding SCM shares
during the
lock-up
period.
The shares of SCM common stock to be issued to Hirsch
shareholders in connection with the Merger will be subject to a
lock-up that
prohibits Hirsch shareholders from, among other restrictions,
selling, offering to sell, pledging, granting any option, right
or warrant for the sale, lending or otherwise disposing of or
transferring any shares of SCM common stock received in
connection with the Merger. Other than with respect to Lawrence
W. Midland and his controlled affiliates, who have a longer
lock-up under the stockholder agreement, this
lock-up is
effective for six months from the closing date for all of the
shares of SCM common stock issued to Hirsch shareholders in
connection with the Merger and is effective for nine months from
the closing date for 50% of the shares. Consequently, the Hirsch
shareholders will have to bear the economic risk of holding the
shares of SCM common stock during the period of the
lock-up.
Standstill
agreements may delay or prevent a change in the management or
acquisition of SCM after the Merger.
Several Hirsch shareholders, including certain members of
Hirschs board of directors, management
and/or their
respective affiliates, will be subject to a three-year
standstill period to begin on the closing date of
the Merger. During the standstill period, such parties agreed
that, subject to limited circumstances, they would not take
15
certain actions with respect to SCM and SCM common stock
including, for example, proposing or entering into any
acquisition transaction with a third party with respect to SCM,
acquiring shares of SCM common stock that would result in such
stockholder holding more than 10% of SCMs outstanding
shares, or participating in the solicitation of proxies with
respect to SCM securities or the securities of its subsidiaries.
After the Merger, these agreements may delay or prevent a change
in management of SCM
and/or a
later acquisition of SCM. These commitments may not be in the
best interests of the other Hirsch shareholders.
The
conditions to closing of the Merger may be waived by SCM or
Hirsch without re-soliciting SCM stockholder or Hirsch
shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement.
The Merger is subject to the satisfaction of the closing
conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. These conditions
may be waived by SCM or Hirsch, subject to the agreement of the
other party in specific cases. See The Merger
Agreement Conditions to Completion of the
Merger. In the event of a waiver of any condition, SCM and
Hirsch will not be required to re-solicited the SCM stockholders
or Hirsch shareholders, and may complete the transaction without
seeking further stockholder or shareholder approval.
The
date on which the Merger will close is uncertain.
The date on which the Merger will close depends on the
satisfaction of the closing conditions set forth in the Merger
Agreement, or the waiver of those conditions by the parties
thereto. While SCM and Hirsch expect to complete the Merger in
the first half of 2009, the completion date of the Merger might
be later than expected because of unforeseen events.
If
NASDAQ determines that the Merger will result in a change of
control of SCM, SCM will be required to submit an initial
listing application and meet all initial NASDAQ Stock Market
inclusion criteria.
In connection with the proposed Merger, NASDAQ will review the
terms and anticipated effect of the Merger to determine if a
change of control will be deemed to occur under its
rules. If NASDAQ determines that the Merger will result in a
change of control of SCM, SCM will be required to submit an
initial listing application and meet all initial NASDAQ Stock
Market inclusion criteria as set forth in the Marketplace Rules
of the NASDAQ Stock Market, and pay all applicable fees, before
consummation of the Merger. If SCM and Hirsch are required to
submit an initial listing application, NASDAQs review of
such application may take up to six to eight weeks, which could
cause a delay in the Mergers consummation. There is also a
risk that NASDAQ may not approve the initial listing application
without substantial revision or delay, or at all.
If the
conditions to the Merger are not met or waived, the Merger will
not occur.
Even if the Merger is approved by the stockholders of SCM and
the shareholders of Hirsch, specified conditions must be
satisfied or waived to complete the Merger. These conditions are
described in the section entitled The Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Completion of the
Merger of the joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus and in the Merger Agreement attached hereto as
Annex A. SCM and Hirsch cannot assure you that all
of the conditions will be satisfied. If the conditions are not
satisfied or waived, the Merger will not occur or will be
delayed, which would result in the loss of some or all of the
expected benefits of the Merger.
If the
two remaining general partners of Secure Keyboards, Ltd. who are
not currently a party to the letter of understanding do not
consent to become a party to and be bound by the letter of
understanding or consent to the Merger, a condition to
SCMs obligation to close the merger will not have been
satisfied.
In connection with the signing of the Merger Agreement,
Robert J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland, as two of
the four general partners of Secure Keyboards, Ltd.
(Keyboards) delivered a letter of understanding to
SCM, as amended and restated on January 30, 2009. Among
other conditions, the obligation of SCM and Merger Subs to
complete the Merger is subject to SCMs receipt or waiver
of Keyboards consent to the Merger and waiver of any
rights to notice pursuant to the terms of the settlement
agreement (with such consent executed by each of its four
respective general partners), and the consent of each of the
other two general partners of Keyboards to become a
16
party to and be bound by the letter of understanding delivered
to SCM by Robert J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland.
On February 9, 2009 and February 11, 2009, counsel
representing the two general partners of Keyboards who are not
currently a party to the letter of understanding sent
communications to SCM and Hirsch objecting to the letter of
understanding, and indicating that the two general partners will
not sign the letter of understanding. There can be no assurance
that any disagreements relating to the letter of understanding
or the settlement agreement can be resolved amicably between the
parties. If the parties are not able to resolve the matter, a
condition to SCMs obligation to close the Merger will not
be satisfied and, if SCM decides not to waive this condition,
the Merger will not be consummated.
If the
Merger is not consummated, SCM may not be successful in its
strategy to grow revenue and become profitable.
One of the components of SCMs growth strategy is to
increase its revenues and operational scale through merger and
acquisition activity. If the proposed Merger with Hirsch is not
consummated, then SCM may not be able to increase its revenues
or operational scale as rapidly as it has planned, or at all. If
SCM is unable to increase its revenues or its operational scale,
it may not be able to fully leverage its global infrastructure,
or to pursue its other growth strategies effectively.
Additionally, if the Merger is not consummated, then the
financial and other resources that SCM has expended on the
Merger may not be recoverable.
Hirschs
business may be negatively affected if the Merger is not
consummated and Hirsch remains a stand-alone
entity.
If the Merger is not completed for any reason, the consequences
could adversely affect Hirschs business and results of
operations, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Hirsch would not realize the benefits expected from becoming
part of SCM, including the potentially enhanced financial and
competitive position;
|
|
|
|
Hirsch may be required to pay SCM a termination fee of
$1.5 million, plus an amount equal to all
out-of-pocket
expenses (excluding the cost of employee time) incurred by SCM
in connection with the Merger Agreement, the ancillary
agreements, and the Merger;
|
|
|
|
some costs related to the transaction, such as legal, accounting
and financial advisor fees, must be paid even if the transaction
is not completed;
|
|
|
|
activities relating to the transaction and related uncertainties
may divert Hirsch managements attention away from the
day-to-day
business and cause substantial disruptions among its employees
and relationships with customers and business partners, thus
detracting from its ability to grow revenue and minimize costs
and possibly leading to a loss of revenue and market position
that it may not be able to regain if the Merger does not
occur; and
|
|
|
|
Hirsch may be unable to locate another entity to merge with at a
later date, or under terms as favorable as those in the Merger
Agreement.
|
The
Merger may not qualify as a reorganization, in which case the
Merger may be a fully taxable transaction to Hirsch shareholders
and warrant holders.
The parties have structured the Merger with the intent that it
qualify as a reorganization under Section 368 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. If the Merger
qualifies as a reorganization, Hirsch shareholders will
recognize taxable income equal to the lesser of (i) the
amount of cash received or (ii) the total gain on the
transaction. However, the qualification of the Merger as a
reorganization depends on numerous factors including whether
Hirsch shareholders will receive a sufficient amount of SCM
common stock to satisfy the continuity of interest test
applicable to reorganizations under Section 368 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Whether the Merger
meets that test depends in large part on the value of the SCM
common stock issued to Hirsch shareholders as compared to the
value of all consideration issued to Hirsch shareholders. Based
on an estimated
17
valuation, the Merger should satisfy the continuity of interest
test. If, however, the Internal Revenue Service were to
challenge the valuations in the appraisal and successfully
contend that the Merger failed to qualify as a reorganization,
the Merger would be a fully taxable transaction to Hirsch
shareholders and warrant holders. In such case, Hirsch
shareholders and warrant holders would recognize gain or loss
measured by the difference between the value of all
consideration received by them in the Merger and their tax basis
in their Hirsch common stock or warrants, as the case may be,
surrendered in the Merger. For additional discussion of the tax
treatment of the Merger, see the section entitled Material
United States Income Tax Consequences of the Merger in
this joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus.
The
SCM financial projections and the Hirsch financial projections
are only estimates of future results and there is no assurance
that actual results will not be different.
The SCM financial projections created by SCM and the Hirsch
financial projections created by Hirsch are only estimates of
possible future operating results and not guarantees of future
performance. The future operating results of SCM and Hirsch and
the combined company will be affected by numerous factors,
including those discussed in this Risk Factors
section of this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus. SCM stockholders and Hirsch shareholders should not
assume that future operating results will conform to either of
the SCM financial projections or the Hirsch financial
projections. The actual operating results will likely differ
from these financial projections.
Directors
of Hirsch have interests in the transaction that may be
different from, or in addition to, the interests of other Hirsch
shareholders, which may influence their
recommendation.
In considering the recommendation of Hirschs board of
directors, Hirsch shareholders should be aware that
Hirschs directors and executive officers have interests in
the Merger and have arrangements that are different from, or in
addition to, those of Hirsch shareholders generally. These
interests and arrangements may create potential conflicts of
interest. As a result of these interests, directors of Hirsch
could be more likely to vote, and recommend to shareholders that
they vote, to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger
than if they did not hold these interests, and may have reasons
for doing so that are not the same as the interests of other
Hirsch shareholders. For a full description of the interests of
directors and executive officers of Hirsch in the Merger, see
The Merger Interests of Hirsch Directors and
Executive Officers in the Merger.
SCM
and Hirsch both have incurred and will incur significant
expenses as a result of the Merger, which will reduce the amount
of capital available to fund the business after the
Merger.
SCM and Hirsch have incurred, and will continue to incur,
significant expenses related to the Merger. These expenses
include investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees,
and printing and other costs. There may also be unanticipated
costs related to the Merger. As a result, the combined company
will have less capital available to fund its activities after
the Merger.
After
the Merger, SCM will continue to incur significant costs as a
result of operating as a public company, and its management may
be required to devote substantial time to compliance
initiatives.
As a public company, SCM currently incurs significant legal,
accounting and other expenses. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and
the NASDAQ Stock Market, have imposed various requirements on
public companies, including requiring establishment and
maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and
changes in corporate governance practices. SCMs management
and other personnel devote a substantial amount of time and
financial resources to these compliance initiatives.
After the Merger, SCM will be subject to all of the same
obligations, and bringing Hirsch into compliance with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require significant expenditures.
Complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require significant
additional expenditures, place additional demands on SCMs
management and may divert managements time and attention
away from the
day-to-day
operations of the business. These additional obligations may
also require SCM to hire additional personnel after the Merger.
Hirsch is currently evaluating its internal controls systems in
order to enable SCM to report on, and SCMs independent
registered public accounting firm after the Merger to attest to,
internal controls, as required by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Hirsch cannot be certain
18
as to the timing of completion of the evaluation, testing and
remediation actions or the impact of the same on the operations
of SCM after the Merger. If, after the Merger, SCM fails to
staff its accounting and finance function adequately, or
maintain internal controls adequate to meet the demands that are
placed upon it as a public company, including the requirements
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, it may be unable to report its
financial results accurately or in a timely manner and its
business and stock price may suffer. The costs of being a public
company, as well as diversion of managements time and
attention, may have a material adverse effect on SCMs
future business, financial condition and results of operations.
Qualified
management, marketing, and sales personnel are difficult to
locate, hire and train, and if SCM cannot attract and retain
qualified personnel after the Merger, it will harm the ability
of the business to grow.
SCM and Hirsch have each grown their businesses through the
services of many people. The success of the combined company
after the Merger depends, in part, on the continued service of
key managerial, marketing and sales personnel. Competition for
qualified management, technical, sales and marketing employees
is intense. In addition, the personnel policies and practices of
SCM and Hirsch may be less compatible than anticipated and some
employees might leave the combined company after the Merger and
go to work for competitors. SCM cannot assure you that it will
be able to attract, retain and integrate employees to develop
and continue its business and strategies after the Merger.
Completion
of the Merger will require a significant amount of attention
from Hirsch management and this diversion of management
attention away from ongoing operations could adversely affect
ongoing operations and business relationships.
Because completing the Merger requires a substantial amount of
attention from Hirsch management, Hirsch management will divert
a significant amount of its attention away from the
day-to-day
operations of the business. As a result, Hirschs business
relationships and ongoing operations may suffer during this
period.
After
the closing of the Merger, SCM faces risks of disagreements or
litigation relating to the settlement agreement and letters of
understanding, which may adversely affect SCMs results of
operations.
Effective November 14, 1994, Hirsch entered into a
settlement agreement with two limited partnerships, Secure
Keyboards, Ltd. and Secure Networks, Ltd., pursuant to which
Hirsch is obligated to pay a royalty of 4.25% on Hirsch revenues
allocated to Secure Keyboards, Ltd. for the period from
December 1, 1994 to December 31, 2020, and a royalty
of 5.5% on Hirsch revenues allocated to Secure Networks, Ltd.
for the period from December 1, 1994 to December 31,
2011. In connection with the entry into the Merger Agreement, on
December 10, 2008, Robert J. Parsons and Lawrence W.
Midland, as two of the four general partners of Secure
Keyboards, Ltd., delivered a letter of understanding to SCM, as
amended and restated January 30, 2009. In addition, Robert
J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland, as the two general partners
of Secure Networks, Ltd., delivered a substantially similar
letter of understanding to SCM, also amended and restated
January 30, 2009. Each letter of understanding contained
certain clarifications of the SCM and Hirsch business
relationship and its resulting impact on the companies
respective revenue streams and on Keyboards or
Networks revenue base, as applicable. Despite the letters
of understandings attempt to clarify the revenue base
subject to the royalty arrangement under the settlement
agreement, there is a risk that future disagreements between SCM
and Secure Keyboards, Ltd. and Secure Networks, Ltd. regarding
the settlement agreement
and/or the
letters of understanding, including disagreements regarding the
revenues subject to the royalty arrangement following the
Merger, could result in litigation that may cause material harm
to SCMs results of operations. See the sections entitled
Certain Agreements Related to the Merger
Settlement Agreement and Certain Agreements Related
to the Merger Keyboards and Networks Letters of
Understanding, for additional information about these
agreements.
If the
two remaining general partners of Secure Keyboards, Ltd. who are
not currently a party to the letter of understanding do not
consent to become a party to and be bound by the letter of
understanding or consent to the Merger, and SCM decides to waive
this closing condition and consummate the Merger
19
without their consent, SCM and Hirsh may face litigation
from these other Secure Keyboards, Ltd. general partners.
As discussed above, a condition to SCMs and Merger
Subs obligations to complete the Merger is the receipt of
Secure Keyboards, Ltd.s (Keyboards) consent to
the Merger and waiver of any rights to notice pursuant to the
terms of the settlement agreement (with such consent executed by
each of its four respective general partners), and the consent
of each of the other two general partners of Keyboards to become
a party to and be bound by the letter of understanding delivered
to SCM by Robert J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland. On
February 9, 2009 and February 11, 2009, counsel
representing the two general partners of Keyboards who are not
currently a party to the letter of understanding sent
communications to SCM and Hirsch objecting to the letter of
understanding, and indicating that the two general partners will
not sign the letter of understanding. If the parties are not
able to resolve the matter, a condition to SCMs obligation
to close the merger will not be satisfied. If SCM decides to
waive this closing condition and the Merger is consummated
without the consent of the two other general partners of
Keyboards, SCM and Hirsch face the risk of litigation being
brought by these two general partners including with respect to
the amount of royalties to which Keyboards is entitled. There is
no guarantee that SCM and Hirsch will prevail in any such
litigation and SCMs results of operations may be
materially harmed as a result of the litigation, in addition to
diverting managements attention away from operations to
attend to the litigation.
SCM
may not have uncovered all the risks associated with the
acquisition of Hirsch and a significant liability may be
discovered after closing of the Merger.
There may be risks that SCM failed to discover in the course of
performing its due diligence investigations related to the
acquisition of Hirsch, which could result in significant
liabilities arising after the consummation of the Merger. In
connection with the acquisition of Hirsch, SCM will assume all
of Hirschs liabilities, both pre-existing and contingent,
as a matter of law upon the exchange of all Hirsch shares of
common stock. The Merger Agreement does not provide for
SCMs indemnification by the former Hirsch shareholders
against any of Hirschs liabilities, should they arise or
become known after the closing of the Merger. Furthermore, there
is no escrow account or indemnity agreement protecting SCM in
the event of any breach of Hirschs representations and
warranties in the Merger Agreement. While SCM tried to minimize
risks by conducting due diligence that SCM deemed appropriate
under the circumstances, SCM may not have identified all
existing or potential risks. Any significant liability that may
arise may harm SCMs business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospects by requiring SCM to expend
significant funds to satisfy such liability.
The
representations and warranties contained in the Merger Agreement
were made solely for purposes of the contract among SCM, Hirsch,
and Merger Subs, and used as a tool for allocating risk among
the parties, and therefore they may not accurately characterize
the actual state of facts or conditions of SCM or
Hirsch.
The representations and warranties contained in the Merger
Agreement were made solely for purposes of the contract among
SCM, Hirsch, and Merger Subs, and are used for the purpose of
allocating risk among the parties, rather than establishing
matters of facts. Because the representations and warranties may
not accurately characterize the actual state of facts or
conditions of SCM or Hirsch, no third party should rely upon the
representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement as
statements of factual information.
Provisions
of the Merger Agreement regarding the payment of a termination
fee by SCM to Hirsch or by Hirsch to SCM could negatively affect
Hirschs business operations or SCMs business
operations if the Merger Agreement is terminated.
In the event the Merger is terminated by SCM or Hirsch in
circumstances that obligate either of SCM or Hirsch, as the case
may be, to pay the termination fee of $1.5 million, plus an
amount equal to all
out-of-pocket
expenses (excluding the cost of employee time) incurred by
either of SCM or Hirsch in connection with the Merger Agreement,
the ancillary agreements, and the transactions contemplated
thereby to the other party, the results of either of SCMs
business operations or Hirschs business operations, as the
case may be, may be adversely impacted.
20
SCMs
and Hirschs customers may seek to change the existing
business relationship with SCM and Hirsch in reaction to the
announcement of the Merger.
In response to the announcement of the Merger, existing or
prospective customers of SCM and Hirsch may delay or defer their
purchase of products or services or other decisions concerning
SCM and Hirsch, or they may seek to change their existing
business relationship. Any delay or deferral in product purchase
or other decisions by customers could have a material adverse
effect on SCMs and Hirschs respective business,
regardless of whether the transaction is ultimately completed.
Risks
Relating to SCMs Business
SCMs business and results of operations are subject to
numerous risks, uncertainties and other factors that you should
be aware of, some of which are described below. The risks,
uncertainties and other factors described in the following risk
factors are not the only ones facing SCM. Additional risks,
uncertainties and other factors not presently known to SCM or
that SCM currently deems immaterial may also impair its business
operations. Any of the risks, uncertainties and other factors
could have a materially adverse effect on SCMs business,
financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or
product market share and could cause the trading price of its
common stock to decline substantially.
SCMs
stock price has been and is likely to remain
volatile.
Over the past few years, the NASDAQ Stock Market and the Prime
Standard of the Frankfurt Exchange have experienced significant
price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected
the market prices of the stocks of technology companies.
Volatility in SCMs stock price on either or both exchanges
may result from a number of factors, including, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
low volumes of trading activity in SCMs stock, particular
in the U.S.;
|
|
|
|
variations in SCMs or its competitors financial
and/or
operational results;
|
|
|
|
the fluctuation in market value of comparable companies in any
of SCMs markets;
|
|
|
|
expected, perceived or announced relationships or transactions
with third parties;
|
|
|
|
comments and forecasts by securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
trading patterns of SCMs stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market
or Prime Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange;
|
|
|
|
the inclusion or removal of SCMs stock from market
indices, such as groups of technology stocks or other indices;
|
|
|
|
loss of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
announcements of technological innovations or new products by
SCM or its competitors;
|
|
|
|
announcements of dispositions, organizational restructuring,
headcount reductions, litigation or write-off of investments;
|
|
|
|
litigation developments; and
|
|
|
|
general market downturns.
|
In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the
market price of their stock have been the object of securities
class action litigation. If SCM were the object of securities
class action litigation, it could result in substantial costs
and a diversion of SCMs managements attention and
resources.
21
SCM
has incurred operating losses and may not achieve
profitability.
SCM has a history of losses with an accumulated deficit of
$198.1 million as of September 30, 2008. SCM may not
be able to achieve expected results, including any guidance or
outlook it may provide from time to time; SCM may continue to
incur losses; and it may be unable to achieve or maintain
profitability.
SCMs
quarterly and annual operating results fluctuate.
SCMs quarterly and annual operating results have varied
greatly in the past and will likely vary greatly in the future
depending upon a number of factors. Many of these factors are
beyond its control. SCMs revenues, gross profit and
operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to
quarter due to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
business and economic conditions overall and in SCMs
markets;
|
|
|
|
the timing and amount of orders SCM receives from its customers
that may be tied to budgetary cycles, seasonal demand, product
plans or program roll-out schedules;
|
|
|
|
cancellations or delays of customer product orders, or the loss
of a significant customer;
|
|
|
|
SCMs ability to obtain an adequate supply of components on
a timely basis;
|
|
|
|
poor quality in the supply of SCMs components;
|
|
|
|
delays in the manufacture of SCMs products;
|
|
|
|
the absence of significant backlog in SCMs business;
|
|
|
|
SCMs inventory levels;
|
|
|
|
SCMs customer and distributor inventory levels and product
returns;
|
|
|
|
competition;
|
|
|
|
new product announcements or introductions;
|
|
|
|
SCMs ability to develop, introduce and market new products
and product enhancements on a timely basis, if at all;
|
|
|
|
SCMs ability to successfully market and sell products into
new geographic or market segments;
|
|
|
|
the sales volume, product configuration and mix of products that
SCM sells;
|
|
|
|
technological changes in the markets for SCMs products;
|
|
|
|
the rate of adoption of industry-wide standards;
|
|
|
|
reductions in the average selling prices that SCM is able to
charge due to competition or other factors;
|
|
|
|
strategic acquisitions, sales and dispositions;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies against the
U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
the timing and amount of marketing and research and development
expenditures;
|
|
|
|
loss of key personnel; and
|
|
|
|
costs related to events such as dispositions, organizational
restructuring, headcount reductions, litigation or write-off of
investments.
|
Due to these and other factors, SCMs revenues may decrease
from their current levels. Because a majority of its operating
expenses are fixed, a small variation in SCMs revenues can
cause significant variations in its operational results from
quarter to quarter and its operating results may vary
significantly in future periods. Therefore, SCMs
historical results may not be a reliable indicator of its future
performance.
22
SCM is
exposed to credit risk on its accounts receivable. This risk is
heightened in times of economic weakness.
SCM distributes its products both through third-party resellers
and directly to certain customers. A majority of SCMs
outstanding trade receivables are not covered by collateral or
credit insurance. SCM may not be able to monitor and limit its
exposure to credit risk on its trade and non-trade receivables,
and it may not be effective in limiting credit risk and avoiding
losses. Additionally, if the global economy and regional
economies continue to deteriorate, one or more of SCMs
customers could experience a weakened financial condition and
SCM could incur a material loss or losses as a result. Beginning
in the third quarter of 2008, global economic uncertainty has
resulted in a lower level of realization of amounts owed to SCM
by some customers.
Disruption
in the global financial markets may adversely impact the
availability and cost of credit.
In the future, SCM may raise additional funds. SCMs
ability to obtain financing for acquisitions or other general
corporate and commercial purposes depends on its operating and
financial performance and is also subject to prevailing economic
conditions and to financial, business and other factors beyond
its control. Recently, global credit markets and the financial
services industry have been experiencing a period of
unprecedented turmoil characterized by the bankruptcy, failure
or sale of various financial institutions. As a result, an
unprecedented level of intervention from the United States and
other governments has been seen. As a result of such disruption,
SCMs ability to raise capital may be severely restricted
and the cost of raising capital through such markets or
privately may increase significantly at a time when it would
like, or need, to do so. Either of these events could have an
impact on SCMs flexibility to pursue additional expansion
or acquisition opportunities, make capital expenditures, or make
another discretionary use of cash and could adversely impact its
financial results. In any case, there can be no assurance that
such funds, if available at all, can be obtained on terms
reasonable to SCM. If SCM is able to obtain additional capital,
the aggregate percentage ownership of its existing stockholders
may be reduced. In addition, any new securities that SCM issues
may have rights senior to those of its common stock.
Disruption
in the global financial markets may adversely impact SCMs
customers and customer spending patterns.
The current financial crisis may cause consumers, businesses and
governments to defer purchases in response to tighter credit,
decreased cash availability and declining consumer confidence.
Accordingly, demand for SCMs products could decrease and
differ materially from its current expectations. Further, some
of SCMs customers may require substantial financing in
order to fund their operations and make purchases from SCM. The
inability of these customers to obtain sufficient credit to
finance purchases of SCMs products and meet their payment
obligations to SCM or possible insolvencies of SCMs
customers could result in decreased customer demand, an impaired
ability for SCM to collect on outstanding accounts receivable,
significant delays in accounts receivable payments, and
significant write-offs of accounts receivable, each of which
could adversely impact SCMs financial results.
Disruption
in the global financial markets may adversely impact SCMs
suppliers.
SCMs ability to meet customers demands depends, in
part, on its ability to obtain timely and adequate delivery of
quality materials, parts and components or products from its
suppliers. Certain of SCMs components are available only
from a single source or limited sources. If certain key
suppliers were to become capacity constrained or insolvent as a
result of the financial crisis, it could result in a reduction
or interruption in supplies or a significant increase in the
price of supplies, each of which would adversely impact
SCMs financial results. In addition, credit constraints at
key suppliers could result in accelerated payment of accounts
payable by SCM, impacting SCMs cash flow.
It is
difficult to estimate operating results prior to the end of a
quarter.
SCM does not typically maintain a significant level of backlog.
As a result, revenue in any quarter depends on contracts entered
into or orders booked and shipped in that quarter. Historically,
many of SCMs customers have tended to make a significant
portion of their purchases towards the end of the quarter, in
part because they believe they are able to negotiate lower
prices and more favorable terms. This trend makes predicting
revenues difficult. The
23
timing of closing larger orders increases the risk of
quarter-to-quarter
fluctuation in revenues. If orders forecasted for a specific
group of customers for a particular quarter are not realized or
revenues are not otherwise recognized in that quarter,
SCMs operating results for that quarter could be
materially adversely affected. In addition, from time to time,
SCM may experience unexpected increases or decreases in demand
for its products resulting from fluctuations in its
customers budgets, purchasing patterns or deployment
schedules. These occurrences are not always predictable and can
have a significant impact on SCMs results in the period in
which they occur.
SCM is
subject to a lengthy sales cycle and additional delays could
result in significant fluctuations in its quarterly operating
results.
SCMs initial sales cycle for a new customer usually takes
a minimum of six to nine months. During this sales cycle, SCM
may expend substantial financial and managerial resources with
no assurance that a sale will ultimately result. The length of a
new customers sales cycle depends on a number of factors,
many of which SCM may not be able to control. These factors
include the customers product and technical requirements
and the level of competition SCM faces for that customers
business. Any delays in the sales cycle for new customers could
delay or reduce SCMs receipt of new revenue and could
cause SCM to expend more resources to obtain new customer wins.
If SCM is unsuccessful in managing sales cycles, its business
could be adversely affected.
SCMs
listing on both the NASDAQ Stock Market and the Prime Standard
of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange exposes its stock price to
additional risks of fluctuation.
SCMs common stock is listed both on the NASDAQ Stock
Market and the Prime Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange
and most of the trading of SCMs stock is on the Prime
Standard. Because of this, factors that would not otherwise
affect a stock traded solely on the NASDAQ Stock Market may
cause SCMs stock price to fluctuate. For example, European
investors may react differently and more positively or
negatively than investors in the United States to events such as
acquisitions, dispositions, one-time charges and higher or lower
than expected revenue or earnings announcements. A significant
positive or negative reaction by investors in Europe to such
events could cause SCMs stock price to increase or
decrease significantly. The European economy and market
conditions in general, or downturns on the Prime Standard
specifically, regardless of the NASDAQ Stock Market conditions,
also could negatively impact SCMs stock price.
A
significant portion of SCMs sales typically come from a
small number of customers, and the loss of one or more of these
customers or variability in the timing of orders could
negatively impact SCMs operating results.
SCMs products are generally targeted at original equipment
manufacturers (OEM) customers in the consumer
electronics, digital photo processing and computer industries,
as well as the government sector, the financial sector and
corporate enterprises. Sales to a relatively small number of
customers historically have accounted for a significant
percentage of SCMs revenues. Sales to SCMs top ten
customers accounted for approximately 56% of revenue in the
first nine months of 2008 and 61% of revenue in fiscal year
2007. SCM expects that sales of its products to a relatively
small number of customers will continue to account for a high
percentage of its total sales for the foreseeable future,
particularly in its Digital Media and Connectivity business,
where approximately two-thirds of SCMs business has
typically been generated by two or three customers. The loss of
a customer or reduction of orders from a significant customer,
including those due to product performance issues, changes in
customer buying patterns, or market, economic or competitive
conditions in its market segments, could significantly lower
SCMs revenues in any period and would increase its
dependence on a smaller group of its remaining customers. For
example, in the third quarter of 2008, sales of SCMs
digital media readers were significantly lower than in previous
quarters due to variability in the timing of orders from one
large customer in this business. Variations in the timing or
patterns of customer orders could also increase SCMs
dependence on other customers in any particular period.
Dependence on a small number of customers and variations in
order levels period to period could result in decreased
revenues, decreased margins,
and/or
inventory or receivables write-offs and otherwise harm
SCMs business and operating results.
24
Sales
of SCMs products depend on the development of emerging
applications in its target markets and on diversifying and
expanding its customer base in new markets and geographic
regions, and with new products.
SCM sells its products primarily to address emerging
applications that have not yet reached a stage of mass adoption
or deployment. For example, SCM sells its smart card readers for
use in various smart card-based security programs in Europe,
such as electronic drivers licenses, national IDs and
e-passports,
which are applications that are not yet widely implemented. In
recent months, SCM also has focused on expanding sales of
existing product lines into new geographic markets and
diversifying and expanding its customer base. For example,
recently SCM has added sales resources to target authentication
programs in the government and enterprise sectors in Latin
America and Asia, and has begun to target the photo kiosk
markets in Europe and Asia. SCM also has initiated business
development activities aimed at penetrating the worldwide
financial services and enterprise markets with new contactless
reader products. SCM introduced the first of these products in
October 2008. Because the markets for SCMs products are
still emerging, demand for SCMs products is subject to
variability from period to period. There is no assurance that
demand will become more predictable as additional smart card
programs demonstrate success. If demand for products to enable
smart card-based security applications does not develop further
and grow sufficiently, SCMs revenue and gross profit
margins could decline or fail to grow. SCM cannot predict the
future growth rate, if any, or the size or composition of the
market for any of its products. SCMs target markets have
not consistently grown or developed as quickly as SCM has
expected, and SCM has experienced delays in the development of
new products designed to take advantage of new market
opportunities. Since new target markets are still evolving, it
is difficult to assess the competitive environment or the size
of the market that may develop. The demand and market acceptance
for SCMs products, as is common for new technologies, is
subject to high levels of uncertainty and risk and may be
influenced by various factors, including, but not limited to,
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, for example the economic
uncertainty caused by the current global banking crisis;
|
|
|
|
SCMs ability to demonstrate to its potential customers and
partners the value and benefits of new products;
|
|
|
|
the ability of SCMs competitors to develop and market
competitive solutions for emerging applications in its target
markets and its ability to win business in advance of and
against such competition;
|
|
|
|
the adoption
and/or
continuation of industry or government regulations or policies
requiring the use of products such as SCMs smart card
readers;
|
|
|
|
the timing of large scale security programs involving smart
cards and related technology by governments, banks and
enterprises;
|
|
|
|
the ability of financial institutions, corporate enterprises,
the U.S. government and other governments to agree on
industry specifications and to develop and deploy security
applications that will drive demand for reader solutions such as
SCMs; and
|
|
|
|
the ability of high capacity flash memory cards to drive demand
for digital media readers, such as SCMs, that enable rapid
transfer of large amounts of data, for example digital
photographs.
|
A
significant portion of SCMs revenue is dependent upon
sales to government programs, which are impacted by uncertainty
of timelines and budgetary allocations, as well as by delays in
developing standards for information technology (IT)
projects and in coordinating all aspects of large smart
card-based
security programs.
Large government programs are a primary target for SCMs
Secure Authentication business, as smart card technology is
increasingly used to enable applications ranging from paying
taxes online, to citizen identification, to receiving health
care. Historically, SCM has sold a significant proportion of its
Secure Authentication products to the U.S. government for
PC and network access by military and federal employees, and
these sales have been an important component of its overall
revenue. In recent periods, SCM has experienced a significant
decrease in sales of its external smart card readers to the
U.S. government, primarily due to weaker demand in this
market as a result of ongoing project and budget delays and a
movement by the U.S. government towards purchasing computer
25
equipment with embedded reader capabilities. SCM continues to
believe that it remains a leading supplier of smart card reader
technology to the U.S. government market and that it is not
losing share to competitors. However, lower overall market
demand and the replacement of external smart card reader sales
with sales of lower-priced interface chips for embedded readers
have resulted in reduced revenue from the U.S. government
sector, which SCM believes is not likely to consistently return
to previous levels. SCM anticipates that a significant portion
of its future revenues will come from government programs
outside the U.S., such as national identity,
e-government,
e-health and
others applications. SCM currently supplies smart card readers
for various government programs in Europe and Asia and is
actively targeting additional programs in these areas as well as
in Latin America. SCM also has spent significant resources
developing a range of
e-health
smart card terminals for the German governments electronic
healthcard program. However, the timing of government smart card
programs is not always certain and delays in program
implementation are common. For example, while the German
government has stated that it plans to distribute new electronic
health cards to its citizens beginning in early 2009, and to put
in place a corresponding network and card reader infrastructure
during 2009, there have already been delays in this program and
the actual timing of equipment and card deployments in the
German
e-health
program remain uncertain. The continued delay of government
projects for any reason could negatively impact SCMs sales.
Some
of SCMs sales are made through distributors, and the loss
of such distributors could result in decreased
revenue.
SCM currently uses distributors to sell some of its products,
primarily into markets or customers where the distributor may
have closer relationships or greater access than SCM.
Distribution arrangements are intended to benefit both SCM and
the distributor, and may be long- or short-term relationships,
depending on market conditions, competition in the marketplace
and other factors. If SCM is unable to maintain effective
distribution channels, there could be a reduction in the amount
of product the Company is able to sell, and revenues could
decrease.
SCMs
products may have defects, which could damage its reputation,
decrease market acceptance of its products, cause it to lose
customers and revenue and result in costly litigation or
liability.
Products such as SCMs smart card readers and digital media
readers may contain defects for many reasons, including
defective design or manufacture, defective material or software
interoperability issues. Often, these defects are not detected
until after the products have been shipped. If any of SCMs
products contain defects or perceived defects or have
reliability, quality or compatibility problems or perceived
problems, SCMs reputation might be damaged significantly,
it could lose or experience a delay in market acceptance of the
affected product or products and it might be unable to retain
existing customers or attract new customers. In addition, these
defects could interrupt or delay sales or SCMs ability to
recognize revenue for products shipped. In the event of an
actual or perceived defect or other problem, SCM may need to
invest significant capital, technical, managerial and other
resources to investigate and correct the potential defect or
problem and potentially divert these resources from other
development efforts. If SCM is unable to provide a solution to
the potential defect or problem that is acceptable to its
customers, it may be required to incur substantial product
recall, repair and replacement and even litigation costs. These
costs could have a material adverse effect on SCMs
business and operating results.
SCM provides warranties on certain product sales, which range
from twelve to twenty-four months, and allowances for estimated
warranty costs are recorded during the period of sale. The
determination of such allowances requires SCM to make estimates
of product return rates and expected costs to repair or to
replace the products under warranty. SCM currently establishes
warranty reserves based on historical warranty costs for each
product line combined with liability estimates based on the
prior twelve months sales activities. If actual return
rates and/or
repair and replacement costs differ significantly from
SCMs estimates, adjustments to recognize additional cost
of sales may be required in future periods.
In addition, because SCMs customers rely on its Secure
Authentication products to prevent unauthorized access to PCs,
networks or facilities, a malfunction of or design defect in its
products (or even a perceived defect) could result in legal or
warranty claims against SCM for damages resulting from security
breaches. If such claims are adversely decided against SCM, the
potential liability could be substantial and have a material
adverse effect on SCMs business and operating results.
Furthermore, the possible publicity associated with any such
claim, whether
26
or not decided against SCM, could adversely affect SCMs
reputation. In addition, a well-publicized security breach
involving smart card-based or other security systems could
adversely affect the markets perception of products like
SCMs in general, or SCMs products in particular,
regardless of whether the breach is actual or attributable to
SCMs products. Any of the foregoing events could cause
demand for SCMs products to decline, which would cause its
business and operating results to suffer.
If SCM
does not accurately anticipate the correct mix of products that
will be sold, it may be required to record charges related to
excess inventories.
Due to the unpredictable nature of the demand for its products,
SCM is required to place orders with its suppliers for
components, finished products and services in advance of actual
customer commitments to purchase these products. Significant
unanticipated fluctuations in demand could result in costly
excess production or inventories. In order to minimize the
negative financial impact of excess production, SCM may be
required to significantly reduce the sales price of the product
to increase demand, which in turn could result in a reduction in
the value of the original inventory purchase. If SCM were to
determine that it could not utilize or sell this inventory, it
may be required to write down the inventorys value, which
it has done in the past. Writing down inventory or reducing
product prices could adversely impact SCMs cost of
revenues and financial condition.
SCMs
business could suffer if its third-party manufacturers cannot
meet production requirements.
SCMs products are manufactured outside the United States
by contract manufacturers. SCMs reliance on foreign
manufacturing poses a number of risks, including, but not
limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing;
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences;
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
tariffs and other trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
export controls;
|
|
|
|
political and economic instability;
|
|
|
|
lack of control over the manufacturing process and ultimately
over the quality of SCMs products;
|
|
|
|
late delivery of SCMs products, whether because of limited
access to product components, transportation delays and
interruptions, difficulties in staffing, or disruptions such as
natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
capacity limitations of SCMs manufacturers, particularly
in the context of new large contracts for its products, whether
because its manufacturers lack the required capacity or are
unwilling to produce the quantities SCM desires; and
|
|
|
|
obsolescence of SCMs hardware products at the end of the
manufacturing cycle.
|
The use of contract manufacturing requires SCM to exercise
strong planning and management in order to ensure that its
products are manufactured on schedule, to correct specifications
and to a high standard of quality. If any of SCMs contract
manufacturers cannot meet its production requirements, it may be
required to rely on other contract manufacturing sources or
identify and qualify new contract manufacturers. SCM may be
unable to identify or qualify new contract manufacturers in a
timely manner or at all or with reasonable terms and these new
manufacturers may not allocate sufficient capacity to SCM in
order to meet SCMs requirements. Any significant delay in
SCMs ability to obtain adequate supplies of its products
from its current or alternative manufacturers would materially
and adversely affect its business and operating results. In
addition, if SCM is not successful at managing the contract
manufacturing process, the quality of its products could be
jeopardized or inventories could be too low or too high, which
could result in damage to SCMs reputation with its
customers and in the marketplace, as well as possible write-offs
of excess inventory.
27
SCM
has a limited number of suppliers of key components, and may
experience difficulties in obtaining components for which there
is significant demand.
SCM relies upon a limited number of suppliers for some key
components of its products. For example, SCM currently utilizes
the foundry services of external suppliers to produce its ASICs
for smart cards readers, and uses chips and antenna components
from third-party suppliers in its contactless smart card
readers. SCMs reliance on a limited number of suppliers
may expose it to various risks including, without limitation, an
inadequate supply of components, price increases, late
deliveries and poor component quality. In addition, some of the
basic components SCM uses in its products, such as digital flash
media, may at any time be in great demand. This could result in
components not being available to SCM in a timely manner or at
all, particularly if larger companies have ordered more
significant volumes of those components, or in higher prices
being charged for components. Disruption or termination of the
supply of components or software used in SCMs products
could delay shipments of these products. These delays could have
a material adverse effect on SCMs business and operating
results and could also damage relationships with current and
prospective customers.
SCMs
markets are highly competitive.
The markets for SCMs products are competitive and
characterized by rapidly changing technology. SCM believes that
the principal competitive factors affecting the markets for its
products include:
|
|
|
|
|
the extent to which products must support existing industry
standards and provide interoperability;
|
|
|
|
the extent to which standards are widely adopted and product
interoperability is required within industry segments;
|
|
|
|
the extent to which products are differentiated based on
technical features, quality and reliability, ease of use,
strength of distribution channels and price; and
|
|
|
|
the ability of suppliers to develop new products quickly to
satisfy new market and customer requirements.
|
SCM currently experiences competition from a number of companies
in each of its target market segments and it believes that
competition in its markets is likely to intensify as a result of
anticipated increased demand for secure digital access products.
SCM may not be successful in competing against offerings from
other companies and could lose business as a result.
SCM also experiences indirect competition from certain of its
customers who currently offer alternative products or are
expected to introduce competitive products in the future. For
example, SCM sells its products to many OEMs who incorporate its
products into their offerings or who resell its products in
order to provide a more complete solution to their customers. If
SCMs OEM customers develop their own products to replace
SCMs products, this would result in a loss of sales to
those customers, as well as increased competition for SCMs
products in the marketplace. In addition, these OEM customers
could cancel outstanding orders for SCMs products, which
could cause it to write down inventory already designated for
those customers. SCM may in the future face competition from
these and other parties that develop digital data security
products based upon approaches similar to or different from
those employed by SCM. In addition, the market for digital
information security and access control products may ultimately
be dominated by approaches other than the approach marketed by
SCM.
Many of SCMs current and potential competitors have
significantly greater financial, technical, marketing,
purchasing and other resources than SCM does. As a result,
SCMs competitors may be able to respond more quickly to
new or emerging technologies or standards and to changes in
customer requirements. SCMs competitors may also be able
to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and
sale of products and may be able to deliver competitive products
at a lower end user price. Current and potential competitors
have established or may establish cooperative relationships
among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability
of their products to address the needs of SCMs prospective
customers. Therefore, new competitors, or alliances among
competitors, may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market
share. Increased competition is likely to result in price
reductions, reduced operating margins and loss of market share.
28
SCM
may have to take back unsold inventory from its
customers.
If demand is less than anticipated, customers may ask that SCM
accept returned products that they do not believe they can sell.
SCM does not have a policy relating to product returns;
however, SCM may determine that it is in its best
interest to accept returns in order to maintain good relations
with its customers. If SCM were to accept product returns, it
may be required to take additional inventory reserves to reflect
the decreased market value of slow-selling returned inventory,
even if the products are in good working order.
Changes
in tax laws or the interpretation thereof, adverse tax audits
and other tax matters may adversely affect SCMs future
results.
A number of factors impact SCMs tax position, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned
and taxed;
|
|
|
|
the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various
tax authorities;
|
|
|
|
changes in the valuation of SCMs deferred tax assets and
liabilities;
|
|
|
|
adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax
returns;
|
|
|
|
increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes; and
|
|
|
|
the repatriation of
non-U.S. earnings
for which SCM has not previously provided for U.S. taxes.
|
Each of these factors makes it more difficult for SCM to project
or achieve expected tax results. An increase or decrease in
SCMs tax liabilities due to these or other factors could
adversely affect its financial results in future periods.
Large
stock holdings outside the U.S. make it difficult for SCM to
achieve a quorum at stockholder meetings and this could
restrict, delay or prevent its ability to implement future
corporate actions, as well as have other effects, such as the
delisting of SCMs stock from the NASDAQ Stock
Market.
To achieve a quorum at a regular or special stockholder meeting,
at least one-third of all shares of SCMs stock entitled to
vote must be present at such a meeting in person or by proxy. In
addition, certain actions, including the approval of a
significant transaction, may require approval of a majority of
the total number of SCMs shares then outstanding. As of
February 11, 2009, the record date for SCMs special
meeting, approximately 50% of SCMs shares outstanding were
held by retail stockholders in Germany, through German banks and
brokers. Securities regulations and business customs in Germany
result in very few German banks and brokers providing SCMs
proxy materials to its stockholders in Germany and in very few
German stockholders voting their shares even when they do
receive such materials. In addition, the absence of a routine
broker non-vote in Germany typically requires the
stockholder to return the proxy card to SCM before the votes it
represents can be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum.
As a result, it is often difficult and costly for SCM, and
requires considerable management resources, to achieve a quorum
at annual and special meetings of its stockholders. If SCM is
unable to achieve a quorum or the required approval of a matter
at a future annual or special meeting of its stockholders,
corporate actions requiring stockholder approval could be
restricted, delayed or even prevented. These include, but are
not limited to, actions and transactions that may be of benefit
to SCMs stockholders, part of its strategic plan or
necessary for its corporate governance, such as the Merger and
related actions and corporate mergers, acquisitions,
dispositions, sales or reorganizations, financings, stock
incentive plans or the election of directors. Even if SCM is
able to achieve a quorum for a particular meeting, some of these
actions or transactions require the approval of a majority of
the total number of SCMs shares then outstanding, and it
may not be successful in obtaining such approval. The failure to
hold an annual meeting of stockholders may also result in SCM
being out of compliance with Delaware law and the qualitative
listing requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market, each of which
requires SCM to hold an annual meeting of its stockholders.
SCMs inability to obtain a quorum at any such meeting may
not be an adequate excuse for such failure. Lack of compliance
with the qualitative listing requirements of the NASDAQ Stock
Market could result in the delisting of SCMs common stock
on the NASDAQ Stock Market. Either of these events would divert
29
managements attention from SCMs operations and would
likely be costly and could also have an adverse effect on the
trading price of the SCMs common stock.
One of
SCMs directors is a partner in the largest shareholder of
SCM, and both of them have significant influence over the
outcome of corporate actions requiring board and shareholder
approval, respectively; however, the shareholders
priorities for SCMs business may be different from
SCMs or its other shareholders.
As of February 11, 2009, Lincoln Vale European Partners
(Lincoln Vale) holds nearly 10% of the outstanding
shares of SCMs common stock. Dr. Hans Liebler, one of
SCMs directors, is a partner of Lincoln Vale and may also
be deemed to beneficially own, either directly or indirectly
through limited partnerships, the shares invested by Lincoln
Vale in SCM. Accordingly, Dr. Liebler
and/or
Lincoln Vale could have significant influence over the outcome
of corporate actions requiring board and shareholder approval,
respectively, including the election of directors, any merger,
consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of SCMs
assets or any other significant corporate transaction. In
addition, Dr. Liebler
and/or
Lincoln Vale could delay or prevent a change of control of SCM,
even if such a change of control would benefit SCMs other
shareholders. SCM cannot assure you that Lincoln Vales
objectives are aligned with those of the other shareholders.
SCM
has global operations, which require significant financial,
managerial and administrative resources.
SCMs business model includes the management of separate
product lines that address disparate market opportunities that
are geographically dispersed. While there is some shared
technology across its products, each product line requires
significant research and development effort to address the
evolving needs of SCMs customers and markets. To support
its development and sales efforts, SCM maintains company offices
and business operations in several locations around the world
including Germany, Hong Kong, India, Japan and the United
States. SCM also must manage contract manufacturers in several
different countries, including, China and Singapore. Managing
its various development, sales, administrative and manufacturing
operations places a significant burden on SCMs financial
systems and has resulted in a level of operational spending that
is disproportionately high compared to SCMs current
revenue levels.
Operating in diverse geographic locations also imposes
significant burdens on SCMs managerial resources. In
particular, SCMs management must:
|
|
|
|
|
divert a significant amount of time and energy to manage
employees and contractors from diverse cultural backgrounds and
who speak different languages;
|
|
|
|
travel between SCMs different company offices;
|
|
|
|
maintain sufficient internal financial controls in multiple
geographic locations that may have different control
environments;
|
|
|
|
manage different product lines for different markets;
|
|
|
|
manage SCMs supply and distribution channels across
different countries and business practices; and
|
|
|
|
coordinate these efforts to produce an integrated business
effort, focus and vision.
|
A failure to effectively manage our operations globally could
have a material adverse effect on our business and operating
results.
SCM
conducts a significant portion of its operations outside the
United States. Economic, political, regulatory and other risks
associated with international sales and operations could have an
adverse effect on SCMs results of
operations.
In addition to its corporate headquarters being located in
Germany, SCM conducts a substantial portion of its business in
Europe and Asia. Approximately 63% of SCMs revenue for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and approximately 49%
of its revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007 was
derived from customers located outside the United States.
Because a significant number of its principal customers are
located in other countries,
30
SCM anticipates that international sales will continue to
account for a substantial portion of its revenues. As a result,
a significant portion of SCMs sales and operations may
continue to be subject to risks associated with foreign
operations, any of which could impact its sales
and/or
operational performance. These risks include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions political
or economic conditions and stability, particularly in emerging
markets;
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in foreign laws and regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences;
|
|
|
|
longer accounts receivable collection cycles;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in managing widespread sales and manufacturing
operations; and
|
|
|
|
less effective protection of intellectual property.
|
Fluctuations
in the valuation of foreign currencies impact costs and/or
revenues SCM discloses in U.S. dollars, and could result in
foreign currency losses.
A significant portion of SCMs business is conducted in
foreign currencies, principally the Euro. Fluctuations in the
value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar
will continue to cause currency exchange gains and losses. If a
significant portion of operating expenses are incurred in a
foreign currency such as the Euro, and revenues are generated in
U.S. dollars, exchange rate fluctuations might have a
positive or negative net financial impact on these transactions,
depending on whether the U.S. dollar devalues or revalues
compared to the Euro. For example, excluding a one-time
severance payment made to its former chief executive officer in
the second quarter of 2007, SCMs general and
administrative expenses in the first half of 2008 were higher
than in the same period of the previous year, primarily due to
the devaluation of the dollar as compared with the Euro. In
addition, the valuation of current assets and liabilities that
are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency
can result in currency exchange gains and losses. For example
when an SCM subsidiary has the Euro as the functional currency,
and this subsidiary has a receivable in U.S. dollars, a
devaluation of the U.S. dollar against the Euro of 10%
would result in a foreign exchange loss of the reporting entity
of 10% of the value of the underlying U.S. dollar
receivable. SCM cannot predict the effect of exchange rate
fluctuations upon future quarterly and annual operating results.
The effect of currency exchange rate changes may increase or
decrease SCMs costs
and/or
revenues in any given quarter, and it may experience currency
losses in the future. To date, SCM has not adopted a hedging
program to protect it from risks associated with foreign
currency fluctuations.
SCMs
key personnel and directors are critical to its business, and
such key personnel may not remain with SCM in the
future.
SCM depends on the continued employment of its senior executive
officers and other key management and technical personnel. If
any of its key personnel were to leave and not be replaced with
sufficiently qualified and experienced personnel, SCMs
business could be adversely affected. In particular, SCMs
current strategy to penetrate the market for contactless payment
solutions is heavily dependent on the vision, leadership and
experience of its chief executive officer, Felix Marx.
SCM also believes that its future success will depend in large
part on its ability to attract and retain highly qualified
technical and management personnel. However, competition for
such personnel is intense. SCM may not be able to retain its key
technical and management employees or to attract, assimilate or
retain other highly qualified technical and management personnel
in the future.
Likewise, as a small, dual-traded company, SCM is challenged to
identify, attract and retain experienced professionals with
diverse skills and backgrounds who are qualified and willing to
serve on its board of directors. The increased burden of
regulatory compliance under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
creates additional liability and exposure for directors, and
financial losses in SCMs business and lack of growth in
its stock price make it
31
difficult for SCM to offer attractive director compensation
packages. If SCM is not able to attract and retain qualified
board members, its ability to practice a high level of corporate
governance could be impaired.
SCM
faces risks associated with strategic
transactions.
A component of SCMs ongoing business strategy is to seek
to buy businesses, products and technologies that complement or
augment its existing businesses, products and technologies. SCM
has in the past acquired or made, and from time to time in the
future may acquire or make, investments in companies, products
and technologies that it believes are complementary to its
existing businesses, products and technologies. Any future
acquisition could expose SCM to significant risks, including,
without limitation, the use of its limited cash balances or
potentially dilutive stock offerings to fund such acquisitions;
costs of any necessary financing, which may not be available on
reasonable terms or at all; accounting charges SCM might incur
in connection with such acquisitions; the difficulty and expense
of integrating personnel, technologies, customer, supplier and
distributor relationships, marketing efforts and facilities
acquired through acquisitions; integrating internal controls
over financial reporting; discovering and correcting
deficiencies in internal controls and other regulatory
compliance, data adequacy and integrity, product quality and
product liabilities; diversion of management resources; failure
to realize anticipated benefits; costly fees for legal and
transaction-related services; and the unanticipated assumption
of liabilities. Any of the foregoing could have a material
adverse effect on SCMs financial condition and results of
operations. SCM may not be successful with any such acquisition.
SCMs business strategy also contemplates divesting
portions of its business from time to time, if and when it
believes it would be able to realize greater value for its
stockholders in so doing. SCM has in the past sold, and may from
time to time in the future sell, all or one or more portions of
its business. Any divestiture or disposition could expose SCM to
significant risks, including, without limitation, costly fees
for legal and transaction-related services; diversion of
management resources; loss of key personnel; and reduction in
revenue. Further, SCM may be required to retain or indemnify the
buyer against certain liabilities and obligations in connection
with any such divestiture or disposition and it may also become
subject to third-party claims arising out of such divestiture or
disposition. In addition, SCM may not achieve the expected price
in a divestiture transaction. Failure to overcome these risks
could have a material adverse effect on SCMs financial
condition and results of operations.
SCM
may be exposed to risks of intellectual property infringement by
third parties.
SCMs success depends significantly upon its proprietary
technology. SCM currently relies on a combination of patent,
copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality
agreements and contractual provisions to protect its proprietary
rights, which afford only limited protection. SCM may not be
successful in protecting its proprietary technology through
patents, it is possible that no new patents will be issued, that
its proprietary products or technologies are not patentable or
that any issued patent will fail to provide SCM with any
competitive advantages.
There has been a great deal of litigation in the technology
industry regarding intellectual property rights, and from time
to time SCM may be required to use litigation to protect its
proprietary technology. This may result in SCM incurring
substantial costs and it may not be successful in any such
litigation.
Despite SCMs efforts to protect its proprietary rights,
unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of its products
or to use its proprietary information and software without
authorization. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries
do not protect proprietary and intellectual property rights to
the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Because
many of its products are sold and a significant portion of its
business is conducted outside the United States, SCMs
exposure to intellectual property risks may be higher.
SCMs means of protecting its proprietary and intellectual
property rights may not be adequate. There is a risk that
SCMs competitors will independently develop similar
technology or duplicate its products or design around patents or
other intellectual property rights. If SCM is unsuccessful in
protecting its intellectual property or its products or
technologies are duplicated by others, its business could be
harmed.
32
Changes
to financial accounting standards may affect SCMs results
of operations and cause SCM to change its business
practices.
SCM prepares its financial statements to conform with
U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles are subject to
interpretation by the Financial Standards Accounting Board, the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the
Securities and Exchange Commission and various other bodies
formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting rules and
policies. A change in those rules or policies could have a
significant effect on SCMs reported results and may affect
its reporting of transactions completed before a change is
announced. Any changes in accounting rules or policies in the
future may result in significant accounting charges.
SCM
faces costs and risks associated with maintaining effective
internal controls over financial reporting, and if it fails to
achieve and maintain adequate internal controls over financial
reporting, its business, results of operations and financial
condition, and investors confidence in SCM could be
materially affected.
Under Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, SCMs management is required to make certain
assessments and certifications regarding its disclosure controls
and internal controls over financial reporting. SCM has
dedicated, and expects to continue to dedicate, significant
management, financial and other resources in connection with its
compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The
process of maintaining and evaluating the effectiveness of these
controls is expensive, time-consuming and requires significant
attention from SCMs management and staff. During the
course of its evaluation, SCM may identify areas requiring
improvement and may be required to design enhanced processes and
controls to address issues identified through this review. This
could result in significant delays and costs to SCM and require
it to divert substantial resources, including management time
from other activities. SCM has found a material weakness in its
internal controls in the past and cannot be certain in the
future that it will be able to report that its controls are
without material weakness or to complete its evaluation of those
controls in a timely fashion.
If SCM fails to maintain an effective system of disclosure
controls or internal control over financial reporting, it may
not be able to rely on the integrity of its financial results,
which could result in inaccurate or late reporting of its
financial results and investigation by regulatory authorities.
If SCM fails to achieve and maintain adequate internal controls,
the financial position of its business could be harmed; current
and potential future shareholders could lose confidence in SCM
and/or its
reported financial results, which may cause a negative effect on
the trading price of its common stock; and SCM could be exposed
to litigation or regulatory proceedings, which may be costly or
divert management attention.
In addition, all internal control systems, no matter how well
designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Because there
are inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control
issues and instances of fraud, if any, within SCM have been or
will be detected. Projections of any evaluation of controls
effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions
or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures. Any failure of SCMs internal control systems
to be effective could adversely affect its business.
SCM
faces risks from litigation.
From time to time, SCM may be subject to litigation, which could
include, among other things, claims regarding infringement of
the intellectual property rights of third parties, product
defects, employment-related claims, and claims related to
acquisitions, dispositions or restructurings. Any such claims or
litigation may be time-consuming and costly, divert management
resources, cause product shipment delays, require SCM to
redesign its products, require SCM to accept returns of products
and to write off inventory, or have other adverse effects on its
business. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse
effect on SCMs results of operations and could require SCM
to pay significant monetary damages.
SCM expects the likelihood of intellectual property infringement
and misappropriation claims may increase as the number of
products and competitors in its markets grows and as it
increasingly incorporates third-party technology into its
products. As a result of infringement claims, SCM could be
required to license intellectual
33
property from a third-party or redesign its products. Licenses
may not be offered when needed or on acceptable terms. If SCM
does obtain licenses from third parties, it may be required to
pay license fees or royalty payments or it may be required to
license some of its intellectual property to others in return
for such licenses. If SCM is unable to obtain a license that is
necessary for it or its third-party manufacturers to manufacture
its allegedly infringing products, SCM could be required to
suspend the manufacture of products or stop its suppliers from
using processes that may infringe the rights of third parties.
SCM also may be unsuccessful in redesigning its products.
SCMs suppliers and customers may be subject to
infringement claims based on intellectual property included in
its products. SCM historically has agreed to indemnify its
suppliers and customers for patent infringement claims relating
to its products. The scope of this indemnity varies, but may, in
some instances, include indemnification for damages and
expenses, including attorneys fees. SCM may periodically
engage in litigation as a result of these indemnification
obligations. SCMs insurance policies exclude coverage for
third-party claims for patent infringement.
Provisions
in SCMs agreements, charter documents, Delaware law and
SCMs rights plan may delay or prevent the acquisition of
SCM by another company, which could decrease the value of your
shares.
SCMs certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware
law contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a
third party to acquire SCM or enter into a material transaction
with SCM without the consent of SCMs board of directors.
These provisions include a classified board of directors and
limitations on actions by SCMs stockholders by written
consent. Delaware law imposes some restrictions on mergers and
other business combinations between SCM and any holder of 15% or
more of SCMs outstanding common stock. In addition,
SCMs board of directors has the right to issue preferred
stock without stockholder approval, which could be used to
dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer.
SCM has adopted a stockholder rights plan. The triggering and
exercise of the rights would cause substantial dilution to a
person or group that attempts to acquire SCM on terms or in a
manner not approved by SCMs board of directors, except
pursuant to an offer conditioned upon redemption of the rights.
While the rights are not intended to prevent a takeover of SCM,
they may have the effect of rendering more difficult or
discouraging an acquisition of SCM that was deemed to be
undesirable by its board of directors.
These provisions will apply even if the offer were to be
considered adequate by some of SCMs stockholders. Because
these provisions may be deemed to discourage a change of
control, they may delay or prevent the acquisition of SCM, which
could decrease the value of SCMs common stock.
You
may experience dilution of your ownership interests due to the
future issuance of additional shares of SCMs stock, and
future sales of shares of its common stock could have an adverse
effect on SCMs stock price.
From time to time, in the future SCM may issue previously
authorized and unissued securities, resulting in the dilution of
the ownership interests of its current stockholders. SCM
currently is authorized to issue up to 40,000,000 shares of
common stock. As of February 11, 2009,
15,743,515 shares of common stock were outstanding.
In 2007, SCMs board of directors and its stockholders
approved SCMs 2007 Stock Option Plan, under which options
to purchase 1.5 million shares of SCM common stock may be
granted. As of September 30, 2008, an aggregate of
approximately 3.1 million shares of common stock was
reserved for future issuance under SCMs stock option
plans, of which 1.9 million shares were subject to
outstanding options. SCM may issue additional shares of its
common stock or other securities that are convertible into or
exercisable for shares of its common stock in connection with
the hiring of personnel, future acquisitions, future private
placements, or future public offerings of its securities for
capital raising or for other business purposes. If SCM issues
additional securities, the aggregate percentage ownership of its
existing stockholders will be reduced. In addition, any new
securities that SCM issues may have rights senior to those of
its common stock.
In addition, the potential issuance of additional shares of its
common stock or preferred stock, or the perception that such
issuances could occur, may create downward pressure on the
trading price of SCMs common stock.
34
Risks
Relating to Hirschs Business
Hirschs business and results of operations are subject
to numerous risks, uncertainties and other factors that you
should be aware of, some of which are described below. The
risks, uncertainties and other factors described in the
following risk factors are not the only ones facing Hirsch.
Additional risks, uncertainties and other factors not presently
known to Hirsch or that Hirsch currently deems immaterial may
also impair its business operations. Any of the risks,
uncertainties and other factors could have a materially adverse
effect on Hirschs business, financial condition, results
of operations, cash flows or product market share.
Hirschs
business could be materially adversely affected as a result of
conditions in the general economy and financial
markets.
Hirsch is subject to the effects of general economic and
financial market conditions. Recently, global credit markets and
the financial services industry have been experiencing a period
of unprecedented turmoil characterized by the bankruptcy,
failure or sale of various financial institutions. As a result,
an unprecedented level of intervention from the United States
and other governments has been seen. As a result of such
disruption, Hirschs ability to raise capital may be
severely restricted and the cost of raising capital through such
markets or privately may increase significantly at a time when
it would like, or need, to do so. If these economic conditions
further deteriorate, the Hirsch business, results of operations
or financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
The
Hirsch business could be materially adversely affected as a
result of adverse conditions in the commercial construction and
renovation markets.
As part of its focus on commercial and industrial markets,
Hirsch is subject to the effects of conditions in the commercial
construction and renovation sector. If these conditions
deteriorate further, resulting in a significant decline in new
commercial construction or a significant decline in renovation
projects, the Hirsch business, results of operations or
financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
The
markets Hirsch serves are highly competitive and it may be
unable to compete effectively.
Hirsch competes with many other companies that manufacture and
market security equipment. Some of these competitors may have
substantially greater financial, engineering, manufacturing,
sales, marketing, channel and partner resources than Hirsch.
Hirsch competes primarily on the basis of its reputation,
product features, product reliability, breadth of product line,
ability to attract and work with other companies as strategic
partners, ability to customize middleware and develop user
interfaces to meet specific customer needs, interoperability
with other systems, databases and devices, ability to offer
end-to-end
identity and access management, and training services. The
inability of Hirsch to compete with respect to any one or more
of the aforementioned factors could have an adverse impact on
Hirschs business.
If the
security management system market does not experience
significant growth or if Hirschs products do not achieve
broad acceptance both domestically and internationally, it will
not be able to achieve its anticipated level of
growth.
Hirschs revenues are derived from sales of its security
solutions. Hirsch cannot accurately predict the future growth
rate or the size of the security management system market. The
expansion of the security management system market and the
market for Hirschs security solutions depends on a number
of factors, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the cost, performance and reliability of its solutions, and the
products and services offered by Hirschs competitors;
|
|
|
|
customers perceptions regarding the benefits of and need
for security solutions;
|
|
|
|
the development and growth of demand for security solutions in
new markets;
|
|
|
|
public perceptions regarding the intrusiveness of
identity-related solutions and the manner in which organizations
use the information collected;
|
|
|
|
public perceptions regarding the confidentiality of private
information;
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
proposed or enacted legislation related to privacy of
information;
|
|
|
|
customers satisfaction with security products; and
|
|
|
|
marketing efforts and publicity regarding security products.
|
Even if the security management systems market continues to
grow, Hirschs solutions may not adequately address market
requirements and may not gain market acceptance. If security
products generally, or Hirschs solutions specifically, do
not gain wide market acceptance, Hirsch may not be able to
achieve its anticipated level of growth and its revenues and
results of operations would suffer.
The
security management systems market is characterized by rapid
technological change and evolving industry standards, which
could render Hirschs existing solutions obsolete or could
result in increased research and development expenditures or
failure to attract or retain customers.
Hirschs future success will depend upon Hirschs
ability to develop and introduce a variety of new capabilities
and enhancements to its existing solutions in order to address
the changing and sophisticated needs of the marketplace.
Frequently, technical development programs in the security
industry require assessments to be made of the future direction
of technology, which is inherently difficult to predict.
A significant portion of Hirschs revenues result from the
sale of access control panels that include certain design
elements that are more than a decade old. These controllers are
typically used in a network architecture that may become
outdated or obsolete. Nearly all Hirschs revenue comes
from physical security products, and that product line alone may
be too narrow to meet future market demands. Hirschs
failure to develop, manufacture, launch and sell next-generation
security products and architectures for both physical and
logical security could significantly affect its financial
performance.
Delays in introducing new products and enhancements, the failure
to choose correctly among technical alternatives or the failure
to offer innovative products or enhancements at competitive
prices may cause customers to forego purchases of Hirschs
solutions and purchase its competitors solutions. Hirsch
may not have adequate resources available to it or may not
adequately keep pace with appropriate requirements in order to
effectively compete in the marketplace.
If
Hirsch does not accurately anticipate the correct mix of
products that will be sold, it may be required to record charges
related to excess inventories.
Due to the unpredictable nature of the demand for Hirschs
products, it is required to place orders with Hirschs
suppliers for components, finished products and services in
advance of actual customer commitments to purchase these
products. Significant unanticipated fluctuations in demand could
result in costly excess production or inventories. In order to
minimize the negative financial impact of excess production,
Hirsch may be required to significantly reduce the sales price
of the product to increase demand, which in turn could result in
a reduction in the value of the original inventory purchase. If
Hirsch was to determine that it could not utilize or sell this
inventory, it may be required to write down its value. Writing
down inventory or reducing product prices could adversely impact
its cost of revenues and financial condition.
Hirschs
business could be adversely affected by changes in laws or
regulations pertaining to security.
The U.S. federal government, contractors to the federal
government and certain industries in the public sector currently
fall, or may in the future fall, under particular regulations
pertaining to security. Some of the laws, regulations,
certifications or requirements that may stimulate new security
systems sales include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) 12 and Federal
Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 201 produced by National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
|
|
|
|
Transportation Security Administrations (TSA)
Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) program.
|
|
|
|
Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA);
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (also known as, the Public Company
Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act).
|
|
|
|
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
|
|
|
|
Gramm-Leach Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA, a.k.a., the Financial
Modernization Act).
|
|
|
|
Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT).
|
|
|
|
Free and Secure Trade Program (FAST).
|
|
|
|
Chemical Facility Anti Terrorism Standards (CFATS).d
|
|
|
|
Various Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
|
Discontinuance of, changes in, or lack of adoption of laws or
regulations pertaining to security could adversely affect
Hirschs performance.
Hirschs
business could be adversely affected by significant changes in
the contracting or fiscal policies of governments and
governmental entities.
Hirsch derives a substantial portion of its revenues from
contracts with international, federal, state and local
governments and government agencies, and subcontracts under
federal government prime contracts. Hirsch believes that the
success and growth of its business will continue to be
influenced by its successful procurement of government contracts
either directly or through prime contractors. Accordingly,
changes in government contracting policies or government
budgetary constraints could directly affect its financial
performance.
Among the factors that could adversely affect Hirschs
business are:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in fiscal policies or decreases in available government
funding or grants;
|
|
|
|
changes in government programs or applicable requirements;
|
|
|
|
the adoption of new laws or regulations or changes to existing
laws or regulations;
|
|
|
|
changes in political or social attitudes with respect to
security and defense issues;
|
|
|
|
potential delays or changes in the government appropriations
process; and
|
|
|
|
delays in the payment of its invoices by government payment
offices.
|
These and other factors could cause governments and governmental
agencies, or prime contractors that purchase Hirsch products or
services, to reduce their purchases under existing contracts, to
exercise their rights to terminate contracts at-will or to
abstain from exercising options to renew contracts, any of which
could have an adverse effect on Hirschs business,
financial condition and results of operations. Many of
Hirschs government customers are subject to stringent
budgetary constraints. The award of additional contracts from
government agencies could be adversely affected by existing or
upcoming spending reduction efforts or budget cutbacks at these
agencies.
International
uncertainties and fluctuations in the value of foreign
currencies could harm Hirschs profitability.
During each of the years ended November 30, 2007 and
November 30, 2008, revenues outside of the Americas
accounted for approximately 11% and 12%, respectively, of
Hirschs total revenues. Hirsch also currently has
international operations, consisting primarily of its office in
Milan, Italy. Hirschs international revenues and
operations are subject to a number of material risks, including,
but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in building and managing foreign operations;
|
|
|
|
regulatory uncertainties in foreign countries;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in enforcing agreements and collecting receivables
through foreign legal systems and other relevant legal issues;
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles;
|
|
|
|
foreign and U.S. taxation issues;
|
|
|
|
potential weaknesses in foreign economies;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies;
|
|
|
|
general economic and political conditions in the markets in
which Hirsch operates; and
|
|
|
|
unexpected domestic and international regulatory, economic or
political changes.
|
Hirschs sales, including sales to customers outside the
United States, are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars,
and therefore downward fluctuations in the value of foreign
currencies relative to the U.S. dollar may make
Hirschs solutions more expensive than local solutions in
international locations. This would make its solutions less
price competitive than local solutions, which could harm its
business. Hirsch does not currently engage in currency hedging
activities to limit the risks of currency fluctuations.
Therefore, fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies could
harm results of operations.
Hirschs
strategy to increase its sales of professional services,
identity management, biometric and smart card-related products
and solutions may not be successful.
Historically, the majority of Hirschs business and
products has been focused on electronic access control and
integrated security management systems. A component of
Hirschs strategy is to develop and grow its sales of other
products and solutions, in particular professional services,
identity management, biometrics and smart card-related products
and solutions. The market for some of these solutions is at an
early stage of development compared to the market for
traditional access control. Hirsch cannot be certain that other
security solutions such as those described above will gain wide
market acceptance, that this market will develop and grow as it
expects, that Hirsch will successfully develop products for this
market, or that it will have the same success in this market as
its has had in its traditional access control systems market.
Competitors
may develop new technologies or products before Hirsch
does.
Hirschs business may be materially adversely affected by
the announcement or introduction of new products and services by
its competitors, and the implementation of effective marketing
or sales strategies by its competitors. There can be no
assurance that competitors will not develop products that are
superior to the Hirschs products. Further, there can be no
assurance that Hirsch will not experience additional price
competition, and that such competition may not adversely affect
Hirschs position and results of operations.
Hirsch expects the market to remain highly competitive. Some
current and potential competitors have substantially greater
financial, engineering, manufacturing, sales, marketing, channel
and partner resources than Hirsch. To compete effectively in
this environment, Hirsch must continually develop and market new
and enhanced solutions and technologies at competitive prices
and must have the resources available to invest in significant
research and development activities. Hirschs failure to
compete successfully could cause its revenues and market share
to decline.
Hirsch
relies on dealers/integrators to sell its products, and any
adverse change in its relationship with its distributors could
result in a loss of revenue and harm its business.
Hirsch distributes its products primarily through independent
dealers/integrators of security equipment. Some of these dealers
also sell Hirschs competitors products, and if they
favor its competitors products for any reason, they may
fail to market its products as effectively or to devote
resources necessary to provide effective sales, which would
cause Hirschs results to suffer. In addition, the
financial health of these dealers and Hirschs continuing
relationships with them are important to Hirschs success.
Some of these dealers may be unable to withstand adverse changes
in business conditions. The Hirsch business could be seriously
harmed if the financial condition of some of these dealers
substantially weakens.
38
Loss
of limited source suppliers may result in delays or additional
expenses.
Hirsch obtains hardware components and complete products from a
limited group of suppliers, and it does not have long-term
agreements with any of these suppliers obligating them to
continue to sell components or products to Hirsch. Hirschs
reliance on its suppliers involves significant risks, including
reduced control over quality, price and delivery schedules.
Because Hirsch has been building its core products for several
years, there are a few parts that have reached
end-of-life.
Hirsch so far has been able to continue to source those parts,
but the continued availability and pricing of older components
in the future is not guaranteed. A significant portion of
Hirschs revenue is derived from the resale of cards and
card readers from HID Corporation (HID), and if
supplies from that company were to be disrupted, Hirschs
business would be adversely affected. Hirsch resells Dell
computers and servers, and disruption of that supply would
adversely affect Hirsch. Hirsch out-sources the stuffing of
printed circuit boards to local manufacturers. The bulk of that
out-sourcing is with a single entity, and disruptions within
that company would adversely affect Hirsch.
Any financial instability of, or consolidation among,
Hirschs manufacturers or contractors could result in it
having to find new suppliers. Hirsch may experience significant
delays in manufacturing and shipping its products to customers
if it loses these sources or if the supplies from these sources
are delayed, or are of poor quality or supplied in insufficient
amounts. As a result, Hirsch may be required to incur additional
development, manufacturing and other costs to establish
alternative sources of supply. It may take several months to
locate alternative suppliers, if required, or to re-tool
Hirschs products to accommodate components from different
suppliers. Hirsch cannot predict if it will be able to obtain
replacement components within the time frames it requires at an
affordable cost, or at all. Any delays resulting from suppliers
failing to deliver components or products on a timely basis, in
sufficient quantities and of sufficient quality or any
significant increase in the price of components from existing or
alternative suppliers could disrupt Hirschs ability to
meet customer demands or reduce Hirschs gross margins.
Hirsch
derives a substantial portion of its revenue through the sale of
its solutions to U.S. government entities, pursuant to
government contracts which differ materially from standard
commercial contracts, involve competitive bidding and may be
subject to cancellation or delay without penalty, any of which
may produce volatility in its revenues and
earnings.
Government contracts frequently include provisions that are not
standard in private commercial transactions. For example,
government contracts may include bonding requirements and
provisions permitting the purchasing agency to cancel or delay
the contract without penalty in certain circumstances.
In addition, government contracts are frequently awarded only
after formal competitive bidding processes, which have been and
may continue to be protracted, and typically impose provisions
that permit cancellation in the event that necessary funds are
unavailable to the public agency. In many cases, unsuccessful
bidders for government agency contracts are provided the
opportunity to formally protest certain contract awards through
various agency, administrative and judicial channels. The
protest process may substantially delay a successful
bidders contract performance, result in cancellation of
the contract award entirely and distract management. Hirsch may
not be awarded contracts for which it bids, and substantial
delays or cancellation of purchases may even follow its
successful bids as a result of such protests.
Furthermore, local government agency contracts may be contingent
upon availability of matching funds from federal or state
entities. Law enforcement and other government agencies are
subject to political, budgetary, purchasing and delivery
constraints which may cause Hirschs quarterly and annual
revenues and operating results to fluctuate in a manner that is
difficult to predict.
Hirschs
business could be adversely affected by negative audits by
government agencies, and Hirsch could be required to reimburse
the U.S. government for costs that it has expended on its
contracts, and its ability to compete successfully for future
contracts could be materially impaired.
Government agencies may audit Hirsch as part of their routine
audits and investigations of government contracts. As part of an
audit, these agencies may review Hirschs performance on
contracts, cost structures and
39
compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards.
These agencies may also review the adequacy of, and
Hirschs compliance with, its own internal control systems
and policies, including its purchasing, property, estimating,
compensation and management information systems. If any of its
costs are found to be improperly allocated to a specific
contract, the costs may not be reimbursed and any costs already
reimbursed for such contract may have to be refunded. An audit
could materially affect Hirschs competitive position and
result in a material adjustment to its financial results or
statement of operations. If a government agency audit uncovers
improper or illegal activities, Hirsch may be subject to civil
and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including
termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of
payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business
with the federal government. In addition, Hirsch could suffer
serious harm to its reputation if allegations of impropriety
were made against it. While Hirsch has never had a negative
audit by a governmental agency, it cannot assure that one will
not occur. If Hirsch was suspended or barred from contracting
with the federal government generally, or if its reputation or
relationships with government agencies were impaired, or if the
government otherwise ceased doing business with it or
significantly decreased the amount of business it does with
Hirsch, its revenues and prospects would be materially harmed.
Hirsch
is subject to extensive government regulation, and its failure
to comply with applicable regulations could subject it to
penalties that may restrict its ability to conduct its
business.
Hirsch is affected by and must comply with various government
regulations that impact its operating costs, profit margins and
the internal organization and operation of its business.
Furthermore, Hirsch may be audited to assure its compliance with
these requirements. Its failure to comply with applicable
regulations, rules and approvals could result in the imposition
of penalties, the loss of Hirschs government contracts or
its cancellation of Hirschs General Services
Administration contract, any of which could adversely affect its
business, financial condition and results of operations. Among
the most significant regulations affecting Hirschs
business are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Federal Acquisition Regulations, or the FAR, and agency
regulations supplemental to the FAR, which comprehensively
regulate the formation and administration of, and performance
under government contracts.
|
|
|
|
The Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and
disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with
contract negotiations.
|
|
|
|
The Cost Accounting Standards, which impose accounting
requirements that govern Hirschs right to reimbursement
under cost-based government contracts.
|
|
|
|
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
|
Laws, regulations and executive orders restricting the use and
dissemination of information classified for national security
purposes and the exportation of certain products and technical
data.
These regulations affect how Hirschs customers can do
business with it, and, in some instances, the regulations impose
added costs on its business. Any changes in applicable laws and
regulations could restrict its ability to conduct its business.
Any failure by Hirsch to comply with applicable laws and
regulations could result in contract termination, price or fee
reductions or suspension or debarment from contracting with the
federal government generally.
If
Hirsch is unable to continue to obtain U.S. government
authorization regarding the export of its products, or if
current or future export laws limit or otherwise restrict
Hirschs business, it could be prohibited from shipping
Hirschs products to certain countries, which could cause
its business, financial condition and results of operations to
suffer.
Hirsch must comply with U.S. laws regulating the export of
Hirschs products. In some cases, explicit authorization
from the U.S. government is needed to export its products.
The export regimes and the governing policies applicable to
Hirschs business are subject to changes. It cannot be
certain that such export authorizations will be available to
Hirsch or for Hirschs products in the future. In some
cases, Hirsch relies upon the compliance activities of its prime
contractors, and it cannot be certain they have taken or will
take all measures necessary to comply with applicable export
laws. If Hirsch or its prime contractor partners cannot obtain
required government approvals under applicable regulations, it
may not be able to sell Hirschs products in certain
international jurisdictions.
40
Hirschs
sometimes lengthy and variable sales cycle will make it
difficult to predict financial results.
Hirschs solutions often require a lengthy sales cycle
ranging from several months to sometimes over a year before it
can receive approvals for purchase. The length of the sales
cycle depends on the size and complexity of the solutions, the
customers budgeting process, the customers in-depth
evaluation of Hirschs solutions and a competitive bidding
process. As a result, Hirsch may incur substantial expense
before it earns associated revenues, since a significant portion
of Hirschs operating expenses is relatively fixed. The
lengthy sales cycles of its solutions make forecasting the
volume and timing of sales difficult. In addition, the delays
inherent in lengthy sales cycles raise additional risks that
customers may cancel contracts or change their minds. If
customer cancellations occur, they could result in the loss of
anticipated sales without allowing Hirsch sufficient time to
reduce Hirschs operating expenses.
Hirschs
financial results often vary significantly from quarter to
quarter and may be negatively affected by a number of
factors.
Hirsch bases its current and future expense levels on its
internal operating plans and sales forecasts, and its operating
costs are to a large extent fixed. As a result, it may not be
able to sufficiently reduce its costs in any quarter to
adequately compensate for an unexpected near-term shortfall in
revenues, and even a small shortfall could disproportionately
and adversely affect financial results for that quarter.
In addition, Hirschs financial results may fluctuate from
quarter to quarter and be negatively affected by a number of
factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the lack or reduction of government funding and the political,
budgetary and purchasing constraints of its government agency
customers;
|
|
|
|
the terms of customer contracts that affect the timing of
revenue recognition;
|
|
|
|
the size and timing of its receipt of customer orders;
|
|
|
|
the inaccurate forecasts or incomplete information from its
channel partners;
|
|
|
|
significant fluctuation in demand for its solutions;
|
|
|
|
price reductions or adjustments, new competitors, or the
introduction of enhanced solutions from new or existing
competitors;
|
|
|
|
cancellations, delays or contract amendments by government
agency customers;
|
|
|
|
protests of federal, state or local government contract awards
by competitors;
|
|
|
|
unforeseen legal expenses, including litigation
and/or
administrative protest costs;
|
|
|
|
potential effects of providing services as a prime contractor
that may not carry gross margins as high as those of its core
solutions;
|
|
|
|
impairment charges arising out of its assessments of goodwill
and intangibles; and
|
|
|
|
other one-time financial charges.
|
Security
breaches in systems that Hirsch sells or maintains could result
in the disclosure of sensitive government information or private
personal information that could result in the loss of clients
and negative publicity.
Many of the systems Hirsch sells manage private personal
information and protect information involved in sensitive
government functions. A security breach in one of these systems
could cause serious harm to Hirschs business as a result
of negative publicity and could prevent Hirsch from having
further access to such systems or other similarly sensitive
areas for other governmental clients.
As part of its technical support services, Hirsch agrees, from
time to time, to possess all or a portion of the security system
database of its customers. This service is subject to a number
of risks. For example, its systems may be vulnerable to physical
or electronic break-ins and service disruptions that could lead
to interruptions, delays or
41
loss of data. If any such compromise of Hirschs security
were to occur, it could be very expensive to correct, could
damage Hirschs reputation and could discourage potential
customers from using its services. Although Hirsch has not
experienced attempted break-ins, it may experience such attempts
in the future. Its systems may also be affected by outages,
delays and other difficulties. Hirschs insurance coverage
may be insufficient to cover losses and liabilities that may
result from such events.
Hirschs
products may have defects, which could damage its reputation,
decrease market acceptance of its products, cause it to lose
customers and revenue and result in costly litigation or
liability.
Products and solutions as complex as those Hirsch offers may
contain defects for many reasons, including defective design or
manufacture, defective material or software interoperability
issues. Often, these defects are not detected until after the
products have been shipped. If any of Hirschs products
contain defects or perceived defects or have reliability,
quality or compatibility problems or perceived problems, its
reputation might be damaged significantly, it could lose or
experience a delay in market acceptance of the affected product
or products and it might be unable to retain existing customers
or attract new customers. In addition, these defects could
interrupt or delay sales or its ability to recognize revenue for
products shipped. In the event of an actual or perceived defect
or other problem, Hirsch may need to invest significant capital,
technical, managerial and other resources to investigate and
correct the potential defect or problem and potentially divert
these resources from other development efforts. If it is unable
to provide a solution to the potential defect or problem that is
acceptable to Hirschs customers, it may be required to
incur substantial product recall, repair and replacement and
even litigation costs. These costs could have a material adverse
effect on its business and operating results.
In addition, because Hirschs customers rely on
Hirschs security products to prevent unauthorized access,
a malfunction of or design defect in its products (or even a
perceived defect) could result in legal or warranty claims
against it for damages resulting from security breaches. If such
claims are adversely decided against us, the potential liability
could be substantial and have a material adverse effect on its
business and operating results. Furthermore, the publicity
associated with any such claim, whether or not decided against
Hirsch, could adversely affect its reputation. In addition, a
well-publicized security breach involving security systems could
adversely affect the markets perception of security
products in general, or its products in particular, regardless
of whether the breach is actual or attributable to its products.
Any of the foregoing events could cause demand for Hirschs
products to decline, which would cause the Hirsch business and
operating results to suffer.
Hirsch
offers a warranty on its products for a period of two years,
which could result in warranty claims, possible litigation, and
liability.
Hirsch offers a warranty on its products for a period of two
years. Purchasers of Hirsch products may bring warranty claims
against Hirsch, which could result in litigation costs and
liability. These costs may adversely effect Hirschs
results of operations.
Failure
to properly manage projects may result in costs or claims
against Hirsch, and Hirschs financial results could be
adversely affected.
Deployments of Hirschs solutions often involve large-scale
projects. The quality of its performance on such projects
depends in large part upon Hirschs ability to manage
relationships with Hirschs customers and to effectively
manage the projects and deploy appropriate resources, including
its own project managers and third party subcontractors, in a
timely manner. Any defects or errors or failures to meet
clients expectations could result in damage to its
reputation or even claims for substantial monetary damages
against it. In addition, Hirsch sometimes guarantees customers
that it will complete a project by a scheduled date or that
Hirschs solutions will achieve defined performance
standards. If its solutions experience a performance problem, it
may not be able to recover the additional costs it will incur in
its remedial efforts, which could materially impair profit from
a particular project. Moreover, a portion of Hirschs
revenues are derived from fixed price contracts. Changes in the
actual and estimated costs and time to complete fixed-price,
time-certain projects may result in revenue adjustments for
contracts where revenue is recognized under the percentage of
completion method. Finally, if Hirsch miscalculates the amount
of resources or time it needs to complete a project for which it
has agreed to capped or fixed fees, its financial results could
be adversely affected.
42
Hirsch
is dependent on its management team and the loss of any key
member of its team may impair Hirschs ability to operate
effectively and may harm Hirschs business.
Hirschs success depends largely upon the continued
services of Hirschs senior management, sales staff, and
other key personnel. Some Hirsch employees have cultivated
relationships with its customers, which makes it particularly
dependent upon their continued employment with it. Hirsch is
also substantially dependent on the continued services of its
existing engineering and project management personnel because of
the highly technical nature of its solutions. Other than an
existing employment agreement with Robert Beliles which will
terminate upon the closing of the Merger, Hirsch does not have
employment agreements with any of its executive officers or key
personnel obligating them to provide continued services and
therefore, they could terminate their employment with it at any
time, without penalty. Hirsch does not maintain key person life
insurance policies on any of its employees. The loss of one or
more members of its management team or other key personnel could
seriously harm Hirschs business.
Any
failure to protect Hirschs intellectual property rights
could impair its ability to protect its proprietary technology,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Hirsch
business, financial condition and results of operations, and on
its ability to compete effectively.
Hirschs success depends significantly upon its proprietary
technology. Hirsch currently relies on a combination of patents,
copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality
agreements and contractual provisions to protect its proprietary
rights, which afford only limited protection. Although Hirsch
often seeks to protect its proprietary technology through
patents, it is possible that no new patents will be issued, that
Hirschs proprietary products or technologies are not
patentable, and that any issued patent will fail to provide it
with any competitive advantages. In addition, Hirsch has
historically not entered into proprietary information and
assignment agreements with its employees or consultants.
Unauthorized third parties may try to copy or reverse engineer
portions of Hirschs products or otherwise obtain and use
its intellectual property. If it fails to protect Hirschs
intellectual property rights adequately, its competitors may
gain access to Hirschs technology, and its business would
thus be harmed. In addition, defending Hirschs
intellectual property rights may entail significant expense. Any
of its trademarks or other intellectual property rights may be
challenged by others or invalidated through administrative
processes or litigation. In addition, its patents, or any
patents that may be issued to it in the future, may not provide
it with any competitive advantages, or may be challenged by
third parties. Furthermore, legal standards relating to the
validity, enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual
property rights are uncertain. Effective patent, trademark,
copyright and trade secret protection may not be available to
Hirsch in every country in which it markets its solutions. The
laws of some foreign countries may not be as protective of
intellectual property rights as those in the United States, and
domestic and international mechanisms for enforcement of
intellectual property rights may be inadequate. Accordingly,
despite its efforts, it may be unable to prevent third parties
from infringing upon or misappropriating its intellectual
property or otherwise gaining access to its technology.
Hirsch may be required to expend significant resources to
monitor and protect its intellectual property rights. It may
initiate claims or litigation against third parties for
infringement of Hirschs proprietary rights or to establish
the validity of its proprietary rights. Any such litigation,
whether or not it is ultimately resolved in its favor, could
result in significant expense to it and divert the efforts of
Hirschs technical and management personnel.
Hirsch
may be sued by third parties in connection with intellectual
property claims, such as for alleged infringement of any third
partys proprietary rights.
Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could
be time-consuming and expensive to litigate or settle, and could
divert management attention away from the execution of
Hirschs business plan. In addition, Hirsch may be required
to indemnify Hirschs customers for third-party
intellectual property infringement claims, which would increase
the cost of an adverse ruling in such a claim. An adverse
determination could also prevent it from offering its solutions
to others.
43
Changes
in tax laws or the interpretation thereof, adverse tax audits
and other tax matters may adversely affect Hirschs future
results.
A number of factors may impact Hirschs tax position,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned
and taxed;
|
|
|
|
the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various
tax authorities;
|
|
|
|
changes in the valuation of its deferred tax assets and
liabilities;
|
|
|
|
adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax
returns;
|
|
|
|
increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes; and
|
|
|
|
the repatriation of
non-U.S. earnings
for which it has not previously provided for U.S. taxes.
|
Any of these factors could make it more difficult for Hirsch to
project or achieve expected tax results. An increase or decrease
in its tax liabilities due to these or other factors could
adversely affect its financial results in future periods.
44
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus
and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties,
as well as assumptions, that could cause the results of SCM and
Hirsch to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
generally are identified by the words may,
will, project, might,
expects, anticipates,
believes, intends,
estimates, should, could,
would, strategy, plan,
continue, pursue, or the negative of
these words or other words or expressions of similar meaning.
All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are
statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. For
example, forward-looking statements include any statements of
the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future
operations, including the execution of integration and
restructuring plans and the anticipated timing of filings; any
statements concerning proposed new products, services or
developments; any statements regarding future economic
conditions or performance; statements of belief and any
statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.
Forward-looking statements may also include any statements of
the plans, strategies and objectives of management with respect
to the approval and closing of the Merger, SCMs and
Hirschs ability to solicit a sufficient number of proxies
to approve the Merger and other matters related to the
consummation of the Merger.
For a discussion of risks associated with the ability of SCM and
Hirsch to complete the Merger and the effect of the Merger on
the present business of SCM, Hirsch and the business of SCM
after the Merger, see the section entitled Risk
Factors, beginning on page 12.
Additional factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements are discussed in reports filed with the SEC by SCM.
See the section entitled Where You Can Find More
Information, beginning on page 210.
If any of these risks or uncertainties materializes or any of
these assumptions proves incorrect, the results of SCM or Hirsch
could differ materially from the forward-looking statements. All
forward-looking statements in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus are current only
as of the date on which the statements were made. SCM and Hirsch
do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any
forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances
after the date on which any statement is made or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
45
SELECTED
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables present selected historical financial
data for SCM and Hirsch and comparative historical and unaudited
pro forma per share data for SCM and Hirsch.
Selected
Historical Financial Data of SCM
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below for SCM
is derived in part from and should be read in conjunction with
SCMs consolidated financial statements, the related notes
and the section of this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus entitled SCM Microsystems
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operation. The consolidated
statement of operations data for each of the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and the
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003,
2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were derived from SCMs audited
consolidated financial statements included in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus. The consolidated
statement of operations data for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008 and the consolidated balance
sheet data as of September 30, 2008 were derived from
SCMs unaudited consolidated financial statements included
in this proxy joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus. The consolidated financial statements were prepared
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (US GAAP). This selected financial
information is unaudited but, in SCM managements opinion,
has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated
financial statements and related notes included throughout this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus and
includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, that SCMs management considers necessary for
a fair presentation of the information for the periods
presented. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of
results to be expected for future periods.
46
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
6,393
|
|
|
$
|
19,377
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,435
|
|
|
$
|
33,613
|
|
|
$
|
27,936
|
|
|
$
|
30,030
|
|
|
$
|
31,147
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
10,961
|
|
|
|
|
17,781
|
|
|
|
21,756
|
|
|
|
17,106
|
|
|
|
17,724
|
|
|
|
18,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
8,416
|
|
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
11,857
|
|
|
|
10,830
|
|
|
|
12,306
|
|
|
|
12,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
3,058
|
|
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
3,767
|
|
|
|
4,081
|
|
|
|
4,807
|
|
|
|
3,958
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
|
7,010
|
|
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
7,498
|
|
|
|
7,040
|
|
|
|
8,560
|
|
|
|
7,943
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
|
7,132
|
|
|
|
7,548
|
|
|
|
9,198
|
|
|
|
9,021
|
|
|
|
11,018
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
4,957
|
|
|
|
14,786
|
|
|
|
|
17,126
|
|
|
|
20,599
|
|
|
|
21,311
|
|
|
|
24,461
|
|
|
|
27,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(2,047
|
)
|
|
|
(6,370
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4,472
|
)
|
|
|
(8,742
|
)
|
|
|
(10,481
|
)
|
|
|
(12,155
|
)
|
|
|
(14,827
|
)
|
Loss from investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
Foreign currency gains (losses) and other income (expense)
|
|
|
(1,290
|
)
|
|
|
(935
|
)
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,164
|
)
|
|
|
(6,663
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,179
|
)
|
|
|
(7,617
|
)
|
|
|
(8,005
|
)
|
|
|
(13,024
|
)
|
|
|
(11,611
|
)
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(3,267
|
)
|
|
|
(6,814
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,292
|
)
|
|
|
(7,690
|
)
|
|
|
(8,155
|
)
|
|
|
(12,851
|
)
|
|
|
(9,598
|
)
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
3,508
|
|
|
|
(2,109
|
)
|
|
|
(6,242
|
)
|
|
|
(13,476
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
5,224
|
|
|
|
(2,171
|
)
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
(15,102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,799
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,042
|
|
|
$
|
(12,435
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,663
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.63
|
)
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from discontinued
operations
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.86
|
)
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.49
|
)
|
Shares used to compute basic and diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
|
15,725
|
|
|
|
15,638
|
|
|
|
15,532
|
|
|
|
15,402
|
|
|
|
15,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
(unaudited)
|
|
$
|
25,020
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,444
|
|
|
$
|
36,902
|
|
|
$
|
32,440
|
|
|
$
|
46,153
|
|
|
$
|
55,038
|
|
Working capital(1) (unaudited)
|
|
|
27,772
|
|
|
|
|
34,027
|
|
|
|
31,967
|
|
|
|
27,371
|
|
|
|
39,161
|
|
|
|
50,700
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
40,600
|
|
|
|
|
48,564
|
|
|
|
51,355
|
|
|
|
52,734
|
|
|
|
73,307
|
|
|
|
96,442
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
31,137
|
|
|
|
|
37,039
|
|
|
|
35,318
|
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
46,829
|
|
|
|
63,424
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Working capital is defined as
current assets less current liabilities
|
47
Selected
Historical Financial Data of Hirsch
The selected financial data set forth below for Hirsch is
derived in part from and should be read in conjunction with
Hirschs financial statements, the related notes and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operation included in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus. The statement of
income data for each of the years ended November 30, 2004,
2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and the balance sheet data as of
November 30, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 were derived
from Hirschs audited financial statements included in this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus.
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended November 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
23,042
|
|
|
$
|
21,990
|
|
|
$
|
20,883
|
|
|
$
|
20,026
|
|
|
$
|
15,899
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
9,370
|
|
|
|
8,747
|
|
|
|
8,214
|
|
|
|
6,353
|
|
Royalties to related parties
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12,026
|
|
|
|
11,627
|
|
|
|
11,198
|
|
|
|
10,897
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,310
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
Selling, General and administrative
|
|
|
9,576
|
|
|
|
8,055
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
7,397
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
12,986
|
|
|
|
8,994
|
|
|
|
8,283
|
|
|
|
8,179
|
|
|
|
8,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(960
|
)
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,702
|
)
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
2,784
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
(1,148
|
)
|
|
|
(1,091
|
)
|
|
|
(1,211
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,038
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,963
|
|
|
$
|
1,573
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,932
|
|
|
$
|
5,014
|
|
|
$
|
4,031
|
|
|
$
|
3,057
|
|
|
$
|
1,253
|
|
Working capital(1) (unaudited)
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
|
|
9,288
|
|
|
|
7,470
|
|
|
|
5,767
|
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
12,065
|
|
|
|
11,758
|
|
|
|
9,499
|
|
|
|
8,375
|
|
|
|
5,848
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
9,356
|
|
|
|
10,066
|
|
|
|
8,240
|
|
|
|
6,241
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Working capital is defined as current assets less current
liabilities |
48
Comparative
Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Per Share Data
The following tables set forth the SCM historical net income
(loss) per share for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, on an unaudited basis, and year ended December 31,
2007, and the historical book value per share as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, on an
unaudited basis, and net income (loss) per share for SCM on an
unaudited pro forma combined basis, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007,
and unaudited pro forma book value per share as of
September 30, 2008.
The pro forma combined data were derived from and should be read
together with the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements and accompanying notes included in this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. This
information is based on the historical balance sheets and
related historical statements of operations of SCM and Hirsch
included in this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus. The pro forma combined data give effect to the
transaction using the purchase method of accounting for business
combinations.
The unaudited pro forma combined per share data is presented for
informational purposes only and is not intended to represent or
be indicative of the per share data that would have been
achieved if the Merger had been completed as of the dates
indicated, and should not be taken as representative of future
consolidated per share data of SCM. SCMs historical data
were derived from and should be read together with the
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus. Hirsch is a privately-held company,
and accordingly, per share historical data for Hirsch are
omitted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCMs Historical Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Basic and diluted income per share from discontinued Operations
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated book value per share(2)
|
|
$
|
1.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated book value per share (unaudited) (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year-Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) per share(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
Basic and diluted income per share from discontinued Operations
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma book value per share(4)
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Historical net income (loss) per share was derived from the
historical periodic SEC filings
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 and
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. |
49
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Consolidated book value per share as of September 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007 are calculated by dividing total
shareholders equity by the weighted average common shares
outstanding as of respective dates. |
|
(3) |
|
Pro forma net income (loss) per share was calculated by dividing
pro forma net income by the pro forma weighted average common
shares outstanding as if the transaction had occurred on
January 1, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Pro forma book value per share is computed by dividing pro forma
total shareholders equity by the pro forma weighted
average common shares outstanding as if the transaction had
occurred on September 30, 2008. |
50
MARKET
PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
SCM
Microsystems
SCMs common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock
Markets National Market under the symbol SCMM
and on the Prime Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under
the symbol SMY. The following table sets forth the
high and low closing prices of SCMs common stock for the
periods indicated.
SCM
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ
|
|
|
Prime Standard
|
|
|
|
National Market
|
|
|
(Quoted in Euros)
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (up to February 11, 2009)
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
2.01
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.19
|
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
1.68
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.17
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
Fiscal 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
4.34
|
|
|
$
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
4.42
|
|
|
$
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.32
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.74
|
|
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
Fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.86
|
|
|
$
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.90
|
|
|
$
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.41
|
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.71
|
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
On December 10, 2008, the last full trading day prior to
the public announcement of entry into the Merger Agreement, the
closing price per share of SCMs common stock as reported
on the NASDAQ Stock Market was $1.27 per share.
On February 11, 2009, the last practicable trading date
before the filing of this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus, the closing price per share of
SCMs common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market
was $2.67.
As of February 11, 2009, SCMs record date, SCM had
approximately 55 stockholders of record stockholders. Not
represented in this figure are individual stockholders in
Germany whose custodian banks do not release stockholder
information about their SCM holdings.
Because the market price of SCMs common stock is subject
to fluctuation, the market value of the shares of SCMs
common stock that holders of Hirsch common stock will be
entitled to receive in the Merger may increase or decrease. The
market prices above may not be indicative of the future value of
the SCM common stock.
Following the consummation of the Merger, SCMs common
stock, including the shares issued in connection with the
Merger, are expected to continue to trade on the NASDAQ Stock
Market under the symbol SCMM and on the Prime
Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol
SMY.
51
SCM has never declared or paid cash dividends on its capital
stock. SCM currently intends to retain earnings, if any, to
finance the growth and development of its business, and does not
expect to pay any cash dividends to its stockholders in the
foreseeable future. Payment of future dividends, if any, will be
at the discretion of SCMs board of directors.
Hirsch
Electronics
There has never been, nor is there expected to be in the future,
a public market for Hirschs ordinary shares.
As of February 10, 2009 Hirschs record date, Hirsch had
approximately 315 shareholders of record.
Hirsch has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its
capital stock nor does it intend to do so in the foreseeable
future.
52
THE
MERGER
This section and the section entitled The Merger
Agreement beginning on page 91 of this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus describe the
material terms of the Merger, including the Merger Agreement.
While SCM and Hirsch believe that this description covers all of
the material terms of the Merger and the Merger Agreement, it
may not contain all of the information that is important to you.
You should read carefully this entire joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus, including the
Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus, and
the other documents to which SCM and Hirsch have referred.
Background
of the Development of the Merger
During a period of approximately three years prior to entering
into the Merger Agreement, Hirsch had engaged in preliminary
discussions with other potential acquirers regarding the sale of
Hirsch. These discussions generally terminated due to
misalignment of valuation expectations between Hirsch and the
potential acquirers.
On May 23, 2006, SCM entered into an advisory services
agreement to engage Newton International Management LLC and
Mr. Ayman Ashour, a principal partner in Bluehill ID (a
significant stockholder of SCM, which was founded in March 2007)
and former director of Hirsch, as a consultant to develop a
growth and acquisition strategy for SCM. Over the course of the
next several months, SCM considered several potential strategic
transactions, including a transaction involving Hirsch, and
representatives of SCM and Hirsch held several meetings.
On June 12, 2006, Steven Humphreys, director of SCM and
Mr. Ashour met with Lawrence W. Midland, President of
Hirsch, at Hirschs offices in Santa Ana, California to
discuss mutual interest in a potential transaction. Over the
course of the next several months, SCM considered several
potential strategic transactions, including a transaction
involving Hirsch, and representatives of SCM and Hirsch held
several meetings.
In late 2006, SCM decided to suspend further consideration of a
strategic transaction and discussions between Hirsch and SCM
regarding a strategic transaction terminated, and SCM terminated
the advisory services agreement with Newton International and
Ayman Ashour.
In early January 2008, SCM engaged Acquarium Partners to prepare
an in-depth market analysis and identify potential acquisition
targets, which included Hirsch Electronics.
In March 2008, Hirsch and SCM began discussing the possibility
of an exclusive distribution agreement between the parties.
On April 7, 2008, Egis Capital, an investment fund that is
managed by a general partnership that certain principals of
Imperial Capital are members of, made a preliminary offer to
purchase the assets of Hirsch, which offer was rejected by
Hirsch due to both valuation and the proposed structure of the
transaction. Egis Capital offered to purchase substantially all
of the assets of Hirsch in exchange for cash and a promissory
note pursuant to, in part, an earnout structure.
Between late May and June 2008, representatives of SCM and
Hirsch met to discuss preliminarily a potential transaction
between the parties.
On July 3, 2008, the Chairman of the Board of SCM
instructed SCMs management to continue to explore a
potential transaction with Hirsch.
On July 7, 2008, Hirsch and SCM signed an exclusive
distributor agreement.
On July 8, 2008, Hirsch and SCM signed a non-disclosure
agreement related to the potential merger and began to exchange
non-public information on a confidential basis.
Between July 21 and 23, 2008, representatives of SCM and Hirsch
met to provide information concerning the respective
companies businesses and to continue discussions regarding
the possibility of a transaction. Also at this time, SCM
received an initial purchase price proposal from Hirsch for the
potential transaction.
53
On July 30, 2008, management of SCM made a presentation to
the SCM board of directors regarding a potential transaction
with Hirsch. After this presentation, the board of directors of
SCM instructed SCMs management to continue to explore a
potential transaction with Hirsch.
Between August 11 and 13, 2008, Mr. Midland met with
representatives of SCM at SCMs headquarters in Ismaning,
Germany, in order to further discuss a potential transaction
between the parties.
On August 19, 2008, Mr. Midland and Felix Marx, Chief
Executive Officer of SCM, had a conference call to discuss
certain proposed terms of a potential transaction. On
September 4, 2008, Mr. Marx and Dr. Mueller,
Executive Vice President, Strategic Sales and Business
Development of SCM, met with Mr. Midland to further discuss
such terms.
During the period of September 2008 through November 2008, SCM
and its advisors conducted legal, financial, technical and
accounting due diligence on Hirsch, based on information and
documentation provided to them by Hirsch. During this period,
Hirsch and its advisors also conducted due diligence on SCM.
Several meetings between representatives of SCM and Hirsch also
took place during this period at which proposed terms of a
potential transaction were discussed.
On September 15, 2008, SCM engaged Avondale Partners to
provide financial advisory services related to the proposed
transaction and to render an opinion evaluating the financial
fairness of any proposed transaction. SCM executed an engagement
letter with Avondale on October 9, 2008.
On September 30, 2008, the SCM board of directors met by
phone to discuss the potential transaction with Hirsch and
instructed SCMs management to continue to explore a
potential transaction with Hirsch.
On October 7, 2008, the SCM board of directors met by phone
with representatives of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP to
discuss certain matters in connection with potential business
combinations. Management of SCM also presented an update of the
status of the discussions with Hirsch regarding a potential
transaction.
Between October 14 and 17, 2008, representatives of SCM met with
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Hirsch and
Hirschs outside counsel, Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener,
Wilhelm & Waldron LLP at Hirschs offices, to
discuss the proposed terms of a potential transaction. On
October 16, 2008, SCM and Hirsch entered into an
exclusivity agreement related to the proposed transaction.
On October 16, 2008, management of SCM presented an update
to the SCM board of directors of the status of the discussions
with Hirsch regarding a potential transaction, and on
October 23, 2008, the SCM board of directors met to discuss
the proposed terms of a transaction with Hirsch.
On October 27, 2008, Hirsch engaged Imperial Capital to
render an opinion evaluating the financial fairness of any
proposed transaction.
On October 30, 2008, Mr. Marx met with
Mr. Midland and representatives of Avondale in Santa Ana,
California to discuss Hirschs operations and financial
projections.
On October 30 and 31, 2008, Mr. Marx met with
Mr. Midland in Santa Ana, California to discuss the
proposed terms of the transaction.
In early November 2008, several meetings between representatives
of SCM and Hirsch also took place at which proposed terms of a
potential transaction were discussed. On November 4 and 5, 2008,
Mr. Midland attended the Cartes smart card trade show and
exhibition in Paris and met with the SCM management team to
continue discussions.
On November 8, 2008, Mr. Marx met with members of
Hirsch management to discuss the proposed transaction and
related matters.
On November 12 and 14, 2008, representatives from SCM and
Hirsch, legal advisors for the two parties, and a representative
from Avondale met in Santa Ana to continue to discuss the
potential transactions.
On November 14, 2008, Hirschs board of directors held
a meeting to discuss the proposed transaction between Hirsch and
SCM. Mr. Marx was present for a portion of the meeting at
which time he was introduced to the Hirsch
54
board. Following the departure of Mr. Marx, a
representative from Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm &
Waldron LLP made a presentation to the board regarding certain
matters in connection with the proposed transaction.
On November 19, 2008, Mr. Marx met with members of the
SCM board of directors to discuss the status of the discussions
regarding the proposed transaction.
On November 21, 2008, Mr. Marx and Mr. Midland
had a conference call to discuss open issues regarding the
proposed transaction, including the terms of the Merger
Agreement.
On November 23, 2008, representatives from SCM and Hirsch
and legal advisors for the two parties had a conference call to
discuss the terms of the proposed transaction, including the
terms of the Merger Agreement.
On November 26, 2008, the Hirsch board of directors met to
further discuss the proposed transaction and the results of the
diligence conducted on SCM. Representatives from Palmieri,
Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP were also in
attendance, and representatives of Imperial Capital were in
attendance for part of the meeting to deliver a draft of
Imperial Capitals fairness opinion. Imperial Capital did
not discuss any of the diligence conducted by Hirsch or its
representatives on SCM at such meeting.
On November 27, 2008, the SCM board of directors held a
special meeting at which the board obtained updates from
management and advisers regarding the status of negotiations
with Hirsch. At the meeting, the SCM board instructed SCMs
management to continue to pursue a potential transaction with
Hirsch. From that day through December 8, 2008,
representatives of SCM and Hirsch, together with their
respective legal counsel, participated in several conference
calls to try to finalize the terms of the potential transaction
and the Merger Agreement.
On December 5, 2008, the Hirsch board of directors held a
meeting to further discuss the proposed merger. A representative
from Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP
was also in attendance at this meeting.
On December 9, 2008, the SCM board of directors held a
special meeting at which the proposed transaction with Hirsch
was further discussed and considered. At the meeting, members of
SCMs senior management team made a presentation to the
board of directors regarding the terms of the proposed Merger
and representatives of Avondale made a financial presentation to
the SCM board of directors and rendered Avondales oral
opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, to the effect that,
as of December 9, 2008, the date of the opinion, and based
upon and subject to the various considerations and limitations
set forth in such opinion, the merger consideration to be paid
by SCM is fair to SCM from a financial point of view. SCMs
legal counsel outlined the principal legal terms and conditions
of the proposed Merger Agreement, and other legal issues
associated with the proposed business combination. Following the
financial and legal presentations and the oral fairness opinion,
and after further discussion, the SCM board unanimously approved
the Merger Agreement and determined that the Merger and the
terms of the Merger Agreement were advisable, fair to and in the
best interests of the SCM stockholders.
On December 10, 2008, the Hirsch board of directors held a
meeting at which the proposed transaction with SCM was further
discussed and considered. Representatives of Imperial Capital
telephonically rendered an opinion to the Hirsch board of
directors that, as of that date, and subject to various
assumptions, qualifications and limitations, the aggregate
consideration to be paid by SCM in the Merger to the holders of
Hirsch common stock, other than Lawrence W. Midland, was fair
from a financial point of view to the Hirsch shareholders, other
than to Mr. Midland, which opinion with such assumptions,
qualifications and limitations, was subsequently confirmed in
writing. A representative from Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener,
Wilhelm & Waldron LLP summarized the key terms and
conditions of the Merger Agreement and certain potential legal
risks and issues associated with the proposed merger. Following
the presentations and further discussion, the board of directors
of Hirsch unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and
determined that the proposed merger and the terms of the Merger
Agreement were advisable, fair to and in the best interests of
the Hirsch shareholders.
On December 10, 2008 counsel for SCM and Hirsch finalized
the Merger Agreement and related documents and the Merger
Agreement was executed by the parties. SCM and Hirsch publicly
announced the proposed merger on December 10, 2008, Pacific
Standard Time, which was prior to the opening of trading on the
Prime Standard Exchange on the morning of December 11,
2008, Central European Time.
55
The SCM
Reasons for the Merger
The SCM board of directors believes that the terms of the Merger
Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are
advisable, and in the best interests of, SCM and its
stockholders, and has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement
and the Merger. The SCM board of directors has concluded that
the Merger with Hirsch presents a compelling strategic
opportunity for SCM to strengthen its position in the security
industry, expand its product offerings and customer base, and
increase its operational scale. The SCM board of directors
recommends that SCM stockholders vote in favor of the SCM
proposals described in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
In reaching its decision to approve the Merger, the SCM board of
directors consulted with SCMs management, financial and
legal advisors, and considered a number of factors, including
the following factors, which the SCM board of directors viewed
as supporting its recommendation:
|
|
|
|
|
the belief of the SCM board of directors that after the Merger
SCM will be better positioned to pursue and implement a strategy
focused on the concept of convergence, the much anticipated
industry trend which combines both the logical and physical
methodologies of access for security systems;
|
|
|
|
the fact that both SCM and Hirsch are strong in the
U.S. government sector, but have complementary areas of
concentration (i.e., Hirsch is focused on physical access
and SCM is focused on PC and network (logical)
access), and that Hirsch is strongly positioned in the
U.S. commercial market, which provides a strong complement
to SCMs activities in the enterprise and financial markets
in Europe and Asia;
|
|
|
|
the expected synergies that will result from the Merger as a
result of leveraging the existing channels and sales forces of
both companies to reach more customers and to jointly develop
new integrated products;
|
|
|
|
the results of SCMs due diligence review of Hirschs
business, finances and operations and its evaluation of
Hirschs management, competitive positions and prospects;
|
|
|
|
the opinion of SCMs financial advisor that, as of
December 9, 2008, and based upon and subject to the
considerations described in its written opinion, the merger
consideration to be paid by SCM pursuant to the Merger Agreement
was fair to SCM from a financial point of view;
|
|
|
|
the likelihood in the judgment of the board of directors of SCM
that the conditions to be satisfied prior to consummation of the
Merger will be satisfied or waived;
|
|
|
|
the cash position of each of SCM and Hirsch and the absence of
any material debt of either of them;
|
|
|
|
the belief that the Merger would increase the overall level of
resources available for sales, marketing, customer support,
engineering and production across target markets and regions,
provide access to Hirschs distribution channels and allow
SCM to leverage Hirschs well-respected brand,
systems-level selling model and the Hirsch Professional Services
Group for development of customer-specific applications; and
|
|
|
|
the belief that the Merger would significantly increase
SCMs revenues, net income and internal resources and
provide greater operational scale and financial solidity.
|
During the course of its deliberations concerning the Merger,
the SCM board of directors also identified and considered a
variety of risks relating to the Merger, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the potential benefits sought in the Merger might
not be realized;
|
|
|
|
the challenges, costs and diversion of management time
associated with successfully integrating the products,
technologies, marketing strategies and organizations of each
company;
|
|
|
|
the risk of management and employee disruption associated with
the Merger, including the risk that despite the efforts SCM
after the Merger, key personnel might not remain employed by SCM;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the Merger may not be completed and the
potential adverse effect of the public announcement to that
effect on the reputation of SCM; and
|
|
|
|
the other risks described in the section of this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus entitled
Risk Factors.
|
56
This discussion of information and factors considered by the SCM
board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but is
intended to summarize the material factors considered by the SCM
board of directors. In view of the wide variety of factors
considered, the SCM board of directors did not find it
practicable to quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to
the specific factors considered. However, after taking into
account all of the factors set forth above, the SCM board of
directors unanimously agreed that the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby were fair to, and in the best
interests of, SCM and the SCM stockholders, and that SCM should
enter into the Merger Agreement.
The
Hirsch Reasons for the Merger
The Hirsch board of directors has determined that the Merger is
advisable, and fair to, and in the best interests of, Hirsch and
its shareholders. The Hirsch board of directors recommends that
Hirsch shareholders vote in favor of the Hirsch proposals
described in this joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus. In reaching its decision to approve the Merger,
Hirschs board of directors considered a number of factors,
including the following, which Hirschs board of directors
viewed as supporting its recommendation:
|
|
|
|
|
the Merger will allow the Hirsch shareholders to gain an equity
interest in SCM, thus providing a vehicle for continued
participation by the Hirsch shareholders in the future
performance not only of the business of Hirsch, but also of SCM;
|
|
|
|
SCM after the Merger will be well positioned to pursue and
implement a strategy focused on the concept of convergence, the
much anticipated industry trend which combines both the logical
and physical methodologies of access for security systems;
|
|
|
|
the increased liquidity available to Hirsch shareholders through
receipt of the cash portion of the consideration and the
acquisition of registered shares of SCM;
|
|
|
|
the opinion of Imperial Capital, attached hereto as
Annex F, a well respected investment banking firm
with specific expertise in the area of security, that, as of
December 10, 2008, and based on and subject to various
assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in its
opinion, the Aggregate Consideration to Non-Insiders (as defined
in its opinion) in the transaction was fair, from a financial
point of view, to the holders of Hirsch common stock, no par
value, other than Lawrence W. Midland;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the proposal regarding the possible Merger was
superior to contemplated transactions considered in connection
with discussions with several other prospective acquirers over
an extended period of time;
|
|
|
|
the conclusion of the board of directors of Hirsch that the
Merger proposal offered a better alternative for the Hirsch
shareholders than the possibility of implementing Hirschs
business plan on a stand-alone basis and deferring consideration
of a business combination pending (i) a more favorable
financial climate or (ii) possible realization of long
anticipated government contracts for Hirsch products;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the Merger will be treated as a
reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes with
the result that the Hirsch shareholders will generally not
recognize taxable gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax
purposes by reason of the receipt of shares of SCM common stock
and the warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock;
|
|
|
|
the likelihood in the judgment of the board of directors of
Hirsch that the conditions to be satisfied prior to consummation
of the Merger will be satisfied or waived;
|
|
|
|
under the terms of the Merger Agreement, another party could
make a superior acquisition proposal which could be accepted by
the board of directors of Hirsch, and that the termination fee;
payable to SCM in such situation would not be a significant
impediment to the making of such proposal;
|
|
|
|
the cash position of each of Hirsch and SCM and the absence of
any material debt of either of them; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the relatively senior age of Lawrence W. Midland, the President
of Hirsch.
|
In the course of its deliberations, Hirschs board of
directors also considered a variety of risks and other
countervailing factors related to entering into the Merger
Agreement, including, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the number of shares of SCM common stock to be
received by Hirsch shareholders does not change, regardless of
any increase or decrease in the price of SCM shares prior to the
closing of the Merger;
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Lawrence W. Midland is anticipated to be the only
Hirsch representative on the SCM board of directors, without any
voting agreement guarantying his election to the board, and that
the current SCM board of directors and officers will have
complete ultimate authority with respect to implementation of
the Hirsch business plan;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Hirsch shareholders will be unable to sell for
a period of six months from the closing of the Merger 100% of
the shares of SCM common stock received in the Merger and that
they will be unable to sell 50% of the shares of SCM common
stock received in the Merger for a period of nine months from
the closing of the Merger;
|
|
|
|
the small daily volume of shares of SCM common stock presently
traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market, which, as a practical matter,
limits the liquidity of the shares of SCM common stock which
will be received by the Hirsch shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the Merger might not be completed and the
potential adverse effect of the public announcement to that
effect on the reputation of Hirsch;
|
|
|
|
the expected significant length of time (6-7 months)
between signing the Merger Agreement and completing the Merger
or terminating the Merger Agreement, and the restrictions on
Hirschs conduct of its business in the meantime;
|
|
|
|
the fact that following announcement of the Merger Agreement,
Hirschs relationship with employees, agents and customers
might be negatively affected because of uncertainties
surrounding Hirschs future status and direction;
|
|
|
|
the amount (up to $1.5 million plus the reimbursement of
SCMs transaction expenses) and circumstances under which
Hirsch may become liable to pay a termination fee to SCM and the
potential effect of such termination fee in deterring other
potential acquirers;
|
|
|
|
the fact that information contained in the
S-4
registration statement regarding Hirsch, including without
limitation, its operations, financial results, significant
shareholders and related party transactions will be made
publicly available to Hirschs competitors, customers,
employees and others (even if the Merger is not consummated for
any reason); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
various other risks associated with SCM and the Merger,
including the risks described in the section entitled Risk
Factors in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
|
The above discussion of information and factors considered by
the Hirsch board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive,
but is indicative of the material factors considered by the
board. In view of the wide variety of factors they considered,
the Hirsch board of directors did not find it practicable to
quantify or otherwise assign relative weight to the specific
factors considered. In addition, the Hirsch board of directors
did not reach any specific conclusion on each factor considered,
or any aspect of any particular factor, but conducted an overall
analysis of these factors. Individual members of the Hirsch
board of directors may have given different weight to different
factors. After taking into account all of the factors described
above, however, the Hirsch board of directors unanimously
determined that the Merger Agreement and the related
transactions were advisable and fair to, and in the best
interests of, Hirsch and its shareholders.
SCM
Financial Projections
SCM provided financial projections for its business to Avondale
SCMs financial advisor, for use in connection with its
fairness analysis, summarized in the section of this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus entitled
The Merger Opinion of the Financial Advisor of
SCM, and to Imperial Capital for use in connection with
Imperial Capitals fairness analysis, summarized in the
section of the joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus entitled The Merger Opinion of
Imperial Capital, LLC to the Board of Directors of Hirsch.
Please note, however, that even though such projections were
provided to Avondale and Imperial Capital, in rendering their
respective fairness opinions, Avondale and Imperial Capital
assumed that the value of SCM common stock would be equal to the
market price for such shares, as further described in the case
of Avondale, in the section entitled The
Merger Opinion of the Financial Advisor of SCM
and in the case of Imperial Capital, in the section entitled
The Merger Opinion of Imperial Capital, LLC to
the Board of Directors of Hirsch.
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending December 31,
|
|
(Dollars, in millions)
|
|
2008A
|
|
|
2008B
|
|
|
2009A
|
|
|
2009B
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
$
|
27.9
|
|
|
$
|
29.9
|
|
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
|
$
|
45.0
|
|
|
$
|
48.8
|
|
|
$
|
55.0
|
|
|
$
|
61.0
|
|
% Growth
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
43.5
|
%(1)
|
|
|
50.6
|
%(2)
|
|
|
8.5
|
%(3)
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
Cost of Revenue
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
% Margin
|
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
|
|
45.5
|
%
|
|
|
46.6
|
%
|
|
|
47.3
|
%
|
|
|
47.1
|
%
|
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
|
|
44.4
|
%
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research & Development
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Selling & Marketing
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
General & Administrative
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amortization of Intangibles
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Restructuring and Other Charges
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
% of Net Revenue
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
|
|
67.8
|
%
|
|
|
46.4
|
%
|
|
|
43.5
|
%
|
|
|
41.9
|
%
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
EBIT
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Depreciation & Amortization
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
% Margin
|
|
|
(26.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(21.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Percentage growth rate based on the net revenue figure provided
in column 2008A. |
|
(2) |
|
Percentage growth rate based on the net revenue figure provided
in column 2008B. |
|
(3) |
|
Percentage growth rate based on the net revenue figure provided
in column 2009B. |
SCMs management provided the above income statement
projections for the years 2008 through 2012. For the years 2008
and 2009, SCM management provided two income statement
projections (columns
2008-A and
2008-B, and columns
2009-A and
2009-B in the table above). The 2008 and 2009 projections were
provided to appropriately reflect a possible range of potential
growth of SCMs business in 2008 and 2009 in light of
general economic conditions and the potential consequences of
short-term trends to SCMs business. Such projections
differ with respect to, among other items, the projections of
net revenue, cost of revenue and certain operating expenses.
Since the SCM income statement projections cover multiple years,
such information by its nature becomes less certain with each
successive year. At the time the SCM income statement
projections were presented, SCM management believed that the
revised income statement projections appropriately reflected the
potential growth of SCMs business in light of the general
economic conditions.
These SCM financial projections rely on numerous assumptions
that included, among others, the assumptions listed below. SCM
did not find it practicable to quantify or otherwise assign
relative weights to the specific assumptions made in connection
with the SCM financial projections:
|
|
|
|
|
SCMs business is government-driven, and the business will
be less affected by the current global economic situation in
2009;
|
|
|
|
the security sector would outperform the overall economy;
|
|
|
|
the market would increasingly demand higher-security products,
such as smart cards, biometrics and multi-factor authentication;
|
|
|
|
demand from security products from U.S. federal government
agencies due to Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)
201 would increase in 2009, and in each year thereafter through
2012;
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
the rate of growth in revenue for SCMs products is driven
by major government related roll-outs, in particular the German
eHealth initiatives will significantly contribute in the
upcoming years;
|
|
|
|
gross margins would represent approximately the same percentages
of revenue for each year as represented in the SCM financial
projections for 2009;
|
|
|
|
SCM would successfully develop and sell new products and
services including, but not limited to, its new family of
contact and contactless smart card reader product line;
|
|
|
|
SCM would continue to regionally expand its global distribution
network as well as its cooperation with new OEMs; and
|
|
|
|
no provision for the potential material effects of extraordinary
business events, such as adverse regulatory developments, major
unplanned new product launches or natural disasters.
|
There can be no guarantee that the assumptions on which the SCM
financial projections are based are correct or will be realized.
In addition, there can be no assurance that the SCM financial
projections will be realized or that actual results will not be
significantly higher or lower than projected.
The SCM financial projections set forth above are included in
this joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus
only because this information was made available to Avondale for
use in its fairness analysis provided to the SCM board of
directors and to Imperial Capital for use in its fairness
analysis provided to the Hirsch board of directors. The SCM
financial projections were not prepared with a view to public
disclosure or compliance with the published guidelines of the
SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants regarding projections or forecasts.
The SCM financial projections do not purport to present
operations in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, or GAAP.
No independent accountants have compiled, examined or performed
any procedures with respect to the SCM financial projections
contained herein, nor have any independent accountants expressed
any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information
or its achievability or the assumptions on which they are based.
You are urged to read carefully these SCM financial projections
together with the SCM financial statements, the Risk Factors,
the summaries of the opinions of the financial advisor to SCM
and Imperial Capital contained in the sections of this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus entitled
The Merger Opinion of the Financial Advisor of
SCM and The Merger Opinion of Imperial
Capital, LLC to the Board of Directors of Hirsch,
respectively, the Written Opinion of Avondale Partners, LLC
attached hereto as Annex E and the Written Opinion
of Imperial Capital, LLC attached hereto as Annex F.
Hirsch
Financial Projections
Hirsch provided preliminary income statement projections for its
business in early November to SCM, Avondale Partners, SCMs
financial advisor, for use in connection with Avondales
financial analysis, summarized in the section of this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus entitled
The Merger Opinion of the Financial Advisor of
SCM, and to Imperial Capital, for use in connection with
Imperial Capitals rendering of its fairness opinion,
summarized in the section of the joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus entitled
The Merger Opinion of Imperial Capital, LLC to
the Board of Directors of Hirsch. These preliminary income
statement projections provided by Hirsch included a projection
of annual revenue growth for Hirschs
60
business, as a stand-alone entity, in the years of 2009 to 2012
of 22% (2009), 18% (2010), 15% (2011) and 10% (2012). The
preliminary Hirsch income statement projections are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending November 30,
|
|
(Dollars, in thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
23,000
|
|
|
$
|
28,000
|
|
|
$
|
33,000
|
|
|
$
|
38,000
|
|
|
$
|
41,800
|
|
Growth Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Direct Product Costs
|
|
|
7,590
|
|
|
|
9,240
|
|
|
|
10,890
|
|
|
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
13,794
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Margin
|
|
|
15,410
|
|
|
|
18,760
|
|
|
|
22,110
|
|
|
|
25,460
|
|
|
|
28,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Margin
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
Operations
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
Growth Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Royalty / License
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
Total Other COGS
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
Growth Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
4,053
|
|
|
|
4,420
|
|
|
|
4,792
|
|
|
|
5,170
|
|
|
|
5,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
11,357
|
|
|
|
14,340
|
|
|
|
17,318
|
|
|
|
20,290
|
|
|
|
22,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin %
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
Sales & Marketing
|
|
|
4,853
|
|
|
|
5,290
|
|
|
|
5,554
|
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
6,123
|
|
Growth Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
R&D
|
|
|
3,328
|
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
G&A
|
|
|
2,947
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
3,412
|
|
|
|
3,583
|
|
Growth Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
11,128
|
|
|
|
9,504
|
|
|
|
10,124
|
|
|
|
10,764
|
|
|
|
11,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income/EBITDA
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
4,836
|
|
|
|
7,194
|
|
|
|
9,526
|
|
|
|
11,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
Subsequently, after careful review and consideration,
Hirschs management determined that its preliminary income
statement projections would require revision to account for the
impact of slowing U.S. and worldwide economic growth,
disruption in the global financial markets, declining consumer
and business confidence and other significant challenges
affecting the economy negatively at that time. Hirsch also
increased the expected net revenue figure for 2008 by $400,000,
to reflect more up-to-date information for the year.
Accordingly, Hirsch revised its preliminary income statement
projections to reflect these considerations and provided the
revised income statement projections to SCM, Avondale Partners
and Imperial Capital in mid-November. At the time the revised
Hirsch income statement projections were presented, Hirsch
management believed the revised income statement projections
more appropriately reflected the potential growth of
Hirschs business in light of the general economic
conditions. In the revised Hirsch income statement projections,
the annual revenue growth rate of Hirschs business, as a
stand-alone entity, is stated as 6.4% in 2008 and projected to
be 10% in the years 2009 through 2012. The revised Hirsch income
statement projections are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending November 30,
|
|
(Dollars, in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
$
|
23.4
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
$
|
28.3
|
|
|
$
|
31.1
|
|
|
$
|
34.3
|
|
% Growth
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Cost of Revenue
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Royalties to Related Parties
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
% Margin
|
|
|
62.5
|
%
|
|
|
62.6
|
%
|
|
|
62.6
|
%
|
|
|
62.6
|
%
|
|
|
62.8
|
%
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General & Administrative
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
Research & Development
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Depreciation & Amortization
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
% of Net Revenue
|
|
|
62.3
|
%
|
|
|
49.8
|
%
|
|
|
46.6
|
%
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
42.1
|
%
|
EBIT
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
Depreciation & Amortization
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
% Margin
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
The preliminary Hirsch income statement projections and the
revised income statement projections rely on numerous
assumptions that included, among others, the assumptions listed
below. Hirsch did not find it practicable to quantify or
otherwise assign relative weights to the specific assumptions
made in connection with the Hirsch income statement projections:
|
|
|
|
|
the U.S. economy would begin recovering from the current
state of economic recession in 2009;
|
|
|
|
the security sector would outperform the overall economy;
|
|
|
|
the rate of growth in revenue for Hirschs products and
services would continue at the same rates, respectively, as
represented in the Projections for 2009;
|
|
|
|
gross margins would represent approximately the same percentages
of revenue for each year as represented in the Projections for
2009;
|
|
|
|
operating expenses as a percentage of revenue would decrease
substantially in 2009 due to lower research and development
costs as major next generation product development projects wind
down, then decrease moderately thereafter due to increased
productivity and operating efficiency;
|
|
|
|
the market would increasingly demand higher-security products,
such as smart cards, biometrics and multi-factor authentication;
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
demand from security products from U.S. federal government
agencies due to Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)
201 would increase in 2009 and each year thereafter through 2012;
|
|
|
|
Hirsch in 2009 would successfully develop and sell new products
and services including but not limited to a next generation
access controller and card reader product line, Hirsch-sourced
cards and identity management solutions; and
|
|
|
|
no provision for the potential material effects of extraordinary
business events, such as adverse regulatory developments, major
unplanned new product launches or natural disasters.
|
There can be no guarantee that the preliminary Hirsch income
statement projections and the revised Hirsch income statement
projections will be realized, or that the assumptions on which
they are based will prove to be correct.
As a private company, Hirsch has not previously made available
to the public any projections as to its future financial
performance. The preliminary Hirsch income statement projections
and the revised Hirsch income statement projections set forth
above are included in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus only because this information was
provided to Imperial Capital for use in its fairness analysis
provided to the Hirsch board of directors and to Avondale for
use in its fairness analysis provided to the SCM board of
directors. The preliminary Hirsch income statement projections
and the revised Hirsch income statement projections were not
prepared with a view to public disclosure or compliance with the
published guidelines of the SEC or the guidelines established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding
projections or forecasts. The preliminary Hirsch income
statement projections and the revised Hirsch income statement
projections do not purport to present operations in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP.
No independent accountants have compiled, examined or performed
any procedures with respect to the preliminary Hirsch income
statement projections and the revised Hirsch income statement
projections contained herein, nor have any independent
accountants expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance
on such information or its achievability or the assumptions on
which they are based.
As Imperial Capital was informed by Hirsch management that the
revised Hirsch income statement projections represented the most
likely future results of Hirsch given the market conditions at
that time, Imperial Capital reviewed and relied upon the revised
Hirsch income statement projections (but not the preliminary
Hirsch income statement projections) in rendering its opinion of
fairness, as summarized in the section of this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus entitled
The Merger Opinion of Imperial Capital, LLC to
the Board of Directors of Hirsch and the Written Opinion
of Imperial Capital, LLC attached hereto as Annex F.
Avondale reviewed and relied upon both the preliminary Hirsch
income statement projections and the revised Hirsch income
statement projections in rending its opinion of fairness, as
summarized in the section of this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus entitled
The Merger Opinion of the Financial Advisor of
SCM and attached hereto as Annex E. For
purposes of its financial analysis, however, Avondale made
certain adjustments to the preliminary Hirsch income statement
projections and the revised Hirsch income statement projections.
In the preliminary Hirsch income statement projections, Avondale
adjusted the projected amount of R&D expenses incurred by
Hirsch to reflect what was believed to be a more normalized
level of R&D expense (based on a
5-year
development cycle and historic trends), among other adjustments.
Projected R&D spending for 2008 was decreased by
$2.0 million and increased by $500,000 in each of the four
subsequent years. The resulting set of adjusted
preliminary Hirsch income statement projections is called the
Hirsch Case in the section of this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus entitled
The Merger Opinion of the Financial Advisor of
SCM and in the Written Opinion of Avondale Partners, LLC,
attached hereto as Annex E. In the revised Hirsch
income statement projections, among other adjustments, Avondale
(i) again adjusted the projected amount of R&D
expenses in the manner discussed above, (ii) adjusted the
revenue figures to reflect the acquisition by Hirsch of Hirsch
EMEA, Inc., which was not reflected in the revised Hirsch income
statement projections (projected revenue was increased $0 in
2008, $2 million in 2009, $3 million in 2010,
$4 million in 2011 and $4 million in 2012) and
(iii) set the 2008 net revenue figure at $23,000,000
to match the 2008 revenue figure in the preliminary Hirsch
income statement projections. The resulting set of
adjusted revised Hirsch income statement projections
is called the SCM Case in the section of this joint
proxy statement/information statement and
63
prospectus entitled The Merger Opinion of the
Financial Advisor of SCM and in the Written Opinion of
Avondale Partners, LLC, attached hereto as Annex E.
You are urged to read carefully these Hirsch income statement
projections together with the Hirsch financial statements, the
Risk Factors, the summaries of the opinions of the financial
advisor to SCM and Imperial Capital contained in the sections of
this joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus
entitled The Merger Opinion of the Financial
Advisor of SCM and The Merger Opinion of
Imperial Capital, LLC to the Board of Directors of
Hirsch, the Written Opinion of Avondale Partners, LLC
attached hereto as Annex E and the Written Opinion
of Imperial Capital, LLC attached hereto as Annex F.
Opinion
of the Financial Advisor of SCM
At the December 9, 2008 meeting of SCMs board of
directors, Avondale Partners (Avondale) rendered its
oral opinion to the board of directors, subsequently confirmed
in writing, to the effect that, as of December 9, 2008, and
based upon and subject to certain matters stated therein, the
consideration to be to be paid by the SCM in the Merger is fair,
from a financial point of view, to SCM.
The full text of Avondales written opinion, dated
December 9, 2008, delivered to the SCM board of directors,
which sets forth the assumptions made, matters considered and
limitations in the review undertaken, is attached as
Annex E to this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus, and the written opinion is
incorporated herein by reference. The opinion was reviewed and
approved by Avondales Fairness Opinion Committee in
conformity with policies and procedures established under the
requirements of Rule 2290 of the NASD Rules of the
Financial Institutions Regulatory Authority. You should read the
opinion carefully and in its entirety. The following summary of
the Avondale opinion is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the opinion.
Avondale, as part of its investment banking services, is
regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
corporate restructurings, strategic alliances, negotiated
underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted
securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and
other purposes. In the past three years, Avondale has provided
investment banking, financial advisory and other financial
services to SCM, for which Avondale received compensation,
including, among other things, having acted as exclusive
sell-side advisor for SCM in the divestiture of one of its
divisions and the corresponding fairness opinion, for which
Avondale received compensation. Avondale has acted as financial
advisor to the SCM board of directors in connection with the
Merger and will receive a fee for its services, a significant
portion of which is contingent upon consummation of the Merger,
and received a fee for its services upon delivery of this
opinion, which fee was not contingent upon consummation of the
Merger.
The SCM board of directors, and not Avondale, determined the
amount of consideration to be paid by SCM in the Merger and
Avondales opinion does not constitute a recommendation to
the SCM stockholders or any other stockholders as to how such
stockholders or any other stockholder should vote with respect
to the Merger. The opinion addresses only the fairness, from a
financial point of view, the consideration to be paid by SCM in
the Merger. It does not address the relative merits of the
Merger as compared to alternative transactions or strategies
that may be available to SCM, nor does it address SCMs
underlying decision to engage in the Merger.
The SCM board of directors did not impose any limitations on
Avondale with respect to the investigations made or procedures
followed in rendering its opinion. Further, SCM did not request
the advice of Avondale with respect to alternatives to the
Merger, and Avondale did not advise SCM with respect to
alternatives to the Merger or SCMs underlying decision to
proceed with or effect the Merger.
Avondales opinion and its related presentation were among
the many factors that the SCM board of directors took into
consideration in making its determination to approve, and to
recommend that SCMs stockholders approve, the Merger.
The following description of Avondales opinion is only a
summary of the analyses and examinations that Avondale deems
material to its opinion. It is not a comprehensive description
of all analyses and examinations actually conducted by Avondale.
The preparation of a fairness opinion necessarily is not
susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Avondale
believes that its analyses and the summary set forth below must
be
64
considered as a whole, and that selecting portions of its
analyses and of the factors considered, without considering all
analyses and factors, would create an incomplete view of the
process underlying the analyses set forth in its presentation to
the SCM board of directors. In addition, Avondale may have given
various analyses more or less weight than other analyses, and
may have deemed various assumptions more or less probable than
other assumptions. The fact that any specific analysis has been
referred to in the summary below is not meant to indicate that
this analysis was given greater weight than any other analysis
described below and should not be taken to be the complete view
of Avondale, with respect to the actual value of Hirsch.
In performing its analyses, Avondale made numerous assumptions
with respect to industry performance, general business and
economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond
the control of SCM. The analyses performed by Avondale are not
necessarily indicative of actual values or actual future
results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than
those suggested by these analyses. These analyses were prepared
solely as part of the analysis performed by Avondale with
respect to whether the consideration to be paid by SCM in the
Merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to SCM and were
provided to the SCM board of directors in connection with the
delivery of Avondales opinion. The analyses do not purport
to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which a company
might actually be sold or the prices at which any securities may
trade at any time in the future.
No company or transaction used in the comparable company or
comparable transaction analyses described below is identical to
Hirsch or the Merger. Accordingly, an analysis of the results of
such analyses is not mathematical; rather, it involves complex
considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial
and operating characteristics of the companies and other factors
that could affect the public trading value of the companies to
which Hirsch, and the Merger are being compared.
Procedures
Followed
In connection with its opinion, Avondale:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial statements of Hirsch for recent years
and certain other relevant financial and operating data of
Hirsch made available to it by senior management of Hirsch;
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft of the Merger Agreement, such draft dated
December 7, 2008;
|
|
|
|
compared Hirsch from a financial point of view with certain
publicly traded companies in the information technology security
and access control industries that Avondale deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
considered the financial terms, to the extent publicly
available, of selected recent business combinations in the
information technology security and access control industries
that Avondale deemed to be comparable, in whole or in part, to
the Merger;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain other transactions Avondale believed to be reasonably
comparable to the Merger;
|
|
|
|
reviewed financial forecasts relating to the business and
prospects of Hirsch and the combined company prepared by the
respective managements of SCM and Hirsch;
|
|
|
|
held discussions with senior management of SCM and Hirsch
regarding Hirschs operating history, products and
services, sales and marketing and the prospects of Hirsch and
the combined company;
|
|
|
|
took into account Avondales assessment of general
economic, market and financial and other conditions and its
experience in other transactions, as well as its expertise in
securities valuation and its knowledge of the industry in which
Hirsch operates; and
|
|
|
|
performed other such analyses and examinations and considered
such other information and financial criteria as Avondale has
deemed appropriate.
|
65
In preparing its opinion, Avondale did not assume any
responsibility to independently verify the information referred
to above. Instead, with SCMs consent, Avondale relied on
the information being accurate and complete. Avondale also made
the following assumptions, in each case with SCMs consent,
that:
|
|
|
|
|
the internal operating data and financial analyses and forecasts
supplied to Avondale were reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of Hirschs senior management as to Hirschs recent
and likely future performance;
|
|
|
|
the Merger will be consummated on the terms and subject to the
conditions described in the Merger Agreement;
|
|
|
|
all necessary governmental and regulatory approvals and third
party consents will be obtained on terms and conditions that
will not have a material adverse effect on Hirsch; and
|
|
|
|
the final Merger Agreement does not differ materially from the
draft of the Merger Agreement Avondale reviewed.
|
In addition, for purposes of its opinion, Avondale relied on
independent accountants as to financial reporting matters with
respect to SCM, the Merger and the Merger Agreement; and did not
assume responsibility for making an independent physical
inspection or appraisal of any of the assets, properties or
facilities of Hirsch. Avondale did not assume responsibility for
any legal matters relating to SCM, the Merger or the Merger
Agreement.
Avondales opinion was necessarily based upon market,
economic, financial and other conditions as they existed on, and
can be evaluated as of, the date of its opinion. Any change in
such conditions would require a reevaluation of Avondales
opinion. Accordingly, although subsequent developments may
affect its opinion, Avondale has not assumed any obligation to
update or revise its opinion.
Summary
of Financial and Other Analyses
As part of the financial analyses, Avondale calculated a low and
high range for the implied merger enterprise value (which
Avondale defined as equity value plus debt less cash and cash
equivalents) of Hirsch implied by the transaction. As of
November 30, 2008, Hirsch had approximately $5,700,000 in
cash and no debt.
The low range for the enterprise value of Hirsch is $24,029,190
and is based on the following merger consideration: $14,117,205
in cash, 9,411,470 shares of SCMs common stock valued
at $13,646,632, 4,705,735 in newly issued warrants to purchase
SCM common stock valued at $1,810,254, and 62,000 currently
outstanding Hirsch warrants to be converted to warrants to
purchase SCM common stock valued at $155,099.
The high range for the enterprise value of Hirsch is $27,361,597
and is based on the following value of the merger consideration:
$14,117,205 in cash, 9,411,470 shares of SCMs common
stock valued at $15,114,821, 4,705,735 in newly issued warrants
for SCM common stock valued at $3,588,692, and 62,000 currently
outstanding Hirsch warrants to be converted to warrants for SCM
common stock valued at $240,879.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
Low Range
|
|
|
High Range
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
14,117,205
|
|
|
$
|
14,117,205
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
13,646,632
|
|
|
|
15,114,821
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
1,810,254
|
|
|
|
3,588,692
|
|
Converted Warrants
|
|
|
155,099
|
|
|
|
240,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Value
|
|
$
|
29,729,190
|
|
|
$
|
33,061,597
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
5,700,000
|
|
|
|
5,700,000
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value
|
|
$
|
24,029,190
|
|
|
$
|
27,361,597
|
|
The low value of the SCM common stock to be issued is valued at
$13,646,632, based on a closing price of $1.45 per share as of
December 5, 2008. The high value of the SCM common stock to
be issued is valued at $15,114,821, based on the
30-day
volume weighted average closing price of $1.61 per share as of
December 5, 2008.
66
The 4,705,375 newly issued warrants to purchase SCM common stock
were valued using the Black-Scholes model. The low range of the
warrants value was calculated utilizing a $3.00 strike price,
five-year term, and underlying SCM common stock price of $1.45
(based on the closing stock price as of December 5, 2008),
and historical volatility of 50.429%. This represented a measure
of volatility, which was based on a
365-day
period from July 31, 2007 to July 31, 2008, prior to
the volatility during the recent economic downturn. The high
range of the warrants value was calculated utilizing a $3.00
strike price, five-year term, an underlying SCM common stock
price of $1.45 as of December 5, 2008, and historical
volatility of 81.615%. This represented a current measure of
volatility, which was based on a
365-day
period from December 4, 2007 to December 4, 2008. The
62,000 currently outstanding Hirsch warrants are to be converted
into newly issued warrants to purchase SCM common stock
utilizing the conversation ratio as stated in the draft Merger
Agreement, dated December 7, 2008. After conversion, the
warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model. The value of
each warrant to be converted varied based on the term and
exercise price of each warrant. The low range was calculated
using a historical volatility of 50.429%. The high range was
calculated using a historical volatility 81.615%.
The table below lists the relevant enterprise value multiples
based on the latest twelve months (LTM), the Hirsch
case and the SCM case of revenue and earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization before taxes
(EBITDA) of the proposed Merger.
Proposed
Merger Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value to:
|
|
Low Range
|
|
|
High Range
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTM Revenue
|
|
|
1.0
|
x
|
|
|
1.2
|
x
|
2008E Hirsch Case
|
|
|
1.0
|
x
|
|
|
1.2
|
x
|
2008E SCM Case
|
|
|
1.0
|
x
|
|
|
1.2
|
x
|
2009E Hirsch Case
|
|
|
0.9
|
x
|
|
|
1.0
|
x
|
2009E SCM Case
|
|
|
0.9
|
x
|
|
|
1.0
|
x
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTM EBITDA
|
|
|
8.2
|
x
|
|
|
9.3
|
x
|
2008E Hirsch Case
|
|
|
10.8
|
x
|
|
|
12.3
|
x
|
2008E SCM Case
|
|
|
10.8
|
x
|
|
|
12.3
|
x
|
2009E Hirsch Case
|
|
|
5.5
|
x
|
|
|
6.3
|
x
|
2009E SCM Case
|
|
|
6.1
|
x
|
|
|
7.0
|
x
|
The following represents a summary of the material financial
analyses performed by Avondale in connection with providing its
opinion to the SCM board of directors. Some of the summaries of
financial analyses performed by Avondale include information
presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand the
financial analyses performed by Avondale, you should read the
tables together with the text of each summary. The tables alone
do not constitute a complete description of the financial
analyses. Considering the data set forth in the tables without
considering the full narrative description of the financial
analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying
the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of
the financial analyses performed by Avondale.
67
Precedent
Transactions Analysis
Based on public and other available information, Avondale
calculated the multiples of enterprise value (which Avondale
defined as equity value plus debt less cash and cash
equivalents) to the LTM revenues and LTM earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) implied
in the following acquisitions of companies in the electronic
access control industry that have been announced since
May 22, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Date Announced
|
|
Name of Acquirer
|
|
Name of Target
|
|
9/22/2008
|
|
Francois-Charles Oberthur
|
|
Oberthur Technologies
|
9/20/2008
|
|
Vector Capital
|
|
Aladdin Knowledge Systems Ltd.
|
7/10/2008
|
|
Aladdin Knowledge Systems
|
|
Secure Computing Corp., Secure Safeword
|
6/25/2008
|
|
Aladdin Knowledge Systems
|
|
Eutronsec S.p.A
|
3/23/2008
|
|
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.
|
|
Digimarc Corp.
|
2/13/2008
|
|
Thoma Cressey Bravo
|
|
Macrovision Corp., Software Business
|
1/7/2008
|
|
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.
|
|
Bioscrypt Inc.
|
10/12/2007
|
|
Endace
|
|
Applied Watch Technologies
|
6/12/2007
|
|
SonicWALL, Inc
|
|
Aventail Corp.
|
3/5/2007
|
|
Vector Capital
|
|
SafeNet, Inc.
|
10/10/2006
|
|
Oberthur Technologies
|
|
IM Technologies Ltd.
|
7/14/2006
|
|
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.
|
|
Irdian Technologies, Inc.
|
5/22/2006
|
|
HID
|
|
Fargo Electronics
|
The following table sets forth the implied revenue and EBITDA
transaction multiples indicated by the precedent transaction
analysis, multiples implied by the proposed Merger, and the
respective implied enterprise values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Enterprise Value/Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precedent Transaction Comparables Multiple
|
|
|
0.7
|
x
|
|
|
8.0
|
x
|
Implied Enterprise Value
|
|
$
|
16.1
|
|
|
$
|
189.3
|
|
Proposed Merger Multiple
|
|
|
1.0
|
x
|
|
|
1.2
|
x
|
Implied Enterprise Value
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
|
$
|
27.4
|
|
Enterprise Value/EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precedent Transaction Comparables Multiple
|
|
|
8.5
|
x
|
|
|
29.1
|
x
|
Implied Enterprise Value
|
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
|
$
|
85.5
|
|
Proposed Merger Multiple
|
|
|
8.2
|
x
|
|
|
9.3
|
x
|
Implied Enterprise Value
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
|
$
|
27.4
|
|
Avondale calculated the implied enterprise value based on the
range of revenue and EBITDA valuation multiples based on the
precedent transactions analysis. This analysis resulted in an
implied enterprise value range of $16.1 million to
$189.3 million based on LTM revenue multiples and an
implied enterprise value range of $24.8 million to
$85.5 million based on LTM EBITDA multiples, which compares
to the implied merger enterprise value of $24.0 million to
$27.4 million.
Comparable
Company Analysis
Based on public and other available information, Avondale
calculated the multiples of enterprise value (which Avondale
defined as equity value, plus debt, less cash and cash
equivalents) to the latest twelve months (LTM), estimated
calendar year 2008 (2008E), and estimated calendar year 2009
(2009E) revenues and earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) for companies
in the electronic access control industry. The estimated
financial data for the comparable companies was based on
consensus estimates from Bloomberg.
68
Avondale believes that the companies listed below have some
operations similar to some of the operations of Hirsch, but
noted that none of these companies have the same management,
composition, size, or combination of businesses as Hirsch:
|
|
|
|
|
G4S plc.;
|
|
|
|
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Cogent Systems;
|
|
|
|
Vasco Data Security International, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Entrust, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Aladdin Knowledge Systems;
|
|
|
|
Actividentity Corp.;
|
|
|
|
Gemalto N.V.; and
|
|
|
|
On Track Innovations Ltd.
|
The following table sets forth the multiples indicated by this
analysis:
Comparable
Company Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars, in millions)
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
Implied Enterprise Value
|
|
Enterprise Value to:
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
LTM Revenue
|
|
|
0.5
|
x
|
|
|
8.2
|
x
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
|
$
|
192.2
|
|
2008E Revenue (Hirsch Case)
|
|
|
0.5
|
x
|
|
|
6.9
|
x
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
$
|
159.4
|
|
2008E Revenue (SCM Case)
|
|
|
0.5
|
x
|
|
|
6.9
|
x
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
$
|
159.4
|
|
2009E Revenue (Hirsch Case)
|
|
|
0.5
|
x
|
|
|
5.7
|
x
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
$
|
159.3
|
|
2009E Revenue (SCM Case)
|
|
|
0.5
|
x
|
|
|
5.7
|
x
|
|
$
|
12.6
|
|
|
$
|
155.3
|
|
LTM EBITDA
|
|
|
4.9
|
x
|
|
|
19.9
|
x
|
|
$
|
14.4
|
|
|
$
|
58.4
|
|
2008E EBITDA (Hirsch Case)
|
|
|
4.9
|
x
|
|
|
15.8
|
x
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
$
|
35.2
|
|
2008E EBITDA (SCM Case)
|
|
|
4.9
|
x
|
|
|
15.8
|
x
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
$
|
35.2
|
|
2009E EBITDA (Hirsch Case)
|
|
|
4.5
|
x
|
|
|
13.1
|
x
|
|
$
|
19.7
|
|
|
$
|
56.9
|
|
2009E EBITDA (SCM Case)
|
|
|
4.5
|
x
|
|
|
13.1
|
x
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
$
|
51.6
|
|
Proposed Merger Enterprise Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
|
$
|
27.4
|
|
The comparable company analysis resulted in an implied
enterprise value range of $11.0 million to
$192.9 million based on LTM, 2008E, and 2009E revenues.
Based on LTM, 2008E, and 2009E EBITDA, the comparable company
analysis resulted in an implied enterprise value range of
$11.0 million to $58.4 million. This compares to the
implied merger enterprise value of $24.0 million to
$27.4 million.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Avondale performed discounted cash flow analyses for the
projected cash flows of Hirsch for the fiscal years ending
December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2012. Avondale
performed these discounted cash flow analyses on the Hirsch case
and SCM case. For both of the cases, Avondale used a range of
discount rates (14.0% to 22.0%) and terminal multiples (4.0x to
12.0x) based on forecasted EBITDA for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2012 to
69
calculate a range of implied enterprise values. The following
table sets forth the implied values indicated by the analyses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hirsch Case
|
|
|
SCM Case
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Implied Enterprise Value
|
|
$
|
48.6
|
|
|
$
|
64.0
|
|
|
$
|
38.0
|
|
|
$
|
49.8
|
|
Proposed Merger Enterprise Value
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
|
$
|
27.4
|
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
|
$
|
27.4
|
|
The discounted cash flow analysis based on the Hirsch case
resulted in an implied enterprise value range of
$48.6 million to $64.0 million. The discounted cash
flow analysis based on the SCM case resulted in an implied
enterprise value range of $38.0 million to
$49.8 million. These cases compare to the implied merger
enterprise value of $24.0 million to $27.4 million.
General
Avondale became entitled to a fixed fee of $150,000 upon its
completion of the work necessary to render an opinion,
regardless of the conclusion reached therein, which is not
contingent upon consummation of the Merger. Avondale is entitled
to additional fees contingent upon consummation of the Merger,
including a payment based upon a calculation of a percentage of
the certain consideration paid by SCM to Hirsch shareholders in
connection with the Merger. Further, SCM has agreed to reimburse
Avondale for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with the engagement, including reasonable
attorneys fees and expenses, and to indemnify Avondale,
its affiliates, and their respective partners, directors,
officers, agents, consultants, employees and controlling persons
against specific liabilities, including liabilities under
applicable securities laws.
In the ordinary course of its business, Avondale may trade in
the equity securities of SCM for its own account and for the
accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a
long or short position in these securities.
Opinion
of Imperial Capital, LLC to the Board of Directors of
Hirsch
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated October 27, 2008,
Hirsch retained Imperial Capital, LLC (Imperial
Capital) to render an opinion to the board of directors of
Hirsch as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the merger consideration to be received by the holders of Hirsch
common stock, pursuant to the Merger. Hirsch selected Imperial
Capital to render an opinion because Hirsch considers Imperial
Capital to be a well-respected investment banking firm with
extensive experience in dealing with companies in the security
industry.
Imperial Capital rendered a written opinion to the board of
directors of Hirsch, on December 10, 2008, that, as of that
date, and based on and subject to various assumptions,
qualifications and limitations set forth in the opinion, the
Aggregate Consideration to Non-Insiders (as defined in the
opinion) was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of Hirsch common stock, no par value, other than
Lawrence W. Midland (as used in this section, such holders of
Hirsch common stock excluding Lawrence W. Midland, the
Non-Insider Shareholders).
The full text of the written opinion of Imperial Capital, dated
December 10, 2008, which sets forth, among other things,
assumptions made, matters considered, and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached as
Annex F to this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus. The following summary of Imperial
Capitals opinion is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the opinion. The opinion expressed by
Imperial Capital was provided solely for the benefit and use of
the board of directors of Hirsch (and was not rendered or
directed to Hirschs shareholders, SCM, or SCMs board
of directors or shareholders or any other person or persons) in
connection with its consideration of the Merger, and such
opinion only addresses whether, as of the date of such opinion,
the Aggregate Consideration to Non-Insiders was fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Non-Insider Shareholders, and
does not address (a) whether the Merger was fair, from a
financial point of view, to the SCM stockholders, or
(b) any other aspect of the proposed Merger.
Imperial Capitals opinion does not constitute a
recommendation as to any action the board of directors of Hirsch
or any shareholder of Hirsch (or the board of directors of SCM
or any stockholder of SCM) should take in connection with the
Merger or any aspect thereof and is not a recommendation as to
whether or not any holder of shares of Hirsch common stock (or
any holder of shares of SCM common stock) should tender their
shares in connection with the Merger or how any holder of Hirsch
common stock (or any holder of SCM common stock)
70
should vote with respect to the Merger. Nor does such opinion
indicate that the consideration received by the holders of
Hirsch common stock is the best possible attainable under any
circumstances. The opinion is solely intended for the benefit
and use of Hirschs board of directors and as such is not
to be relied upon by any other person or used for any other
purpose or reproduced, disseminated, summarized, quoted from or
referred to at any time, in whole or in part, without Imperial
Capitals prior written consent, which shall not be
unreasonably withheld. Imperial Capital has, however, consented
to the disclosure of its opinion in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus as provided in
its written consent attached hereto as Exhibit 23.1 hereto.
You are urged to read the opinion carefully and in its entirety.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
performed by Imperial Capital in connection with rendering its
opinion. The summary of the financial analyses is not a complete
description of all of the analyses performed by Imperial
Capital. THE IMPERIAL CAPITAL OPINION IS BASED ON THE
TOTALITY OF THE VARIOUS ANALYSES THAT IT PERFORMED, AND NO
PARTICULAR PORTION OF THE ANALYSIS HAS ANY MERIT STANDING
ALONE.
While this summary describes the analysis and factors that
Imperial Capital deemed material in rendering the opinion, it is
not a comprehensive description of all analyses and factors
considered by Imperial Capital. The preparation of a fairness
opinion is a complex process that involves various
determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods
of financial analysis and the application of these methods to
the particular circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is
not readily susceptible to partial analysis or a summary
description. In arriving at its opinion, Imperial Capital did
not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor
considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to
the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor.
Accordingly, Imperial Capital believes that its analyses must be
considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its
analyses and of the factors considered by it, without
considering all analyses and factors, could create a misleading
or incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying its
opinion. Several analytical methodologies were employed and no
one method of analysis should be regarded as critical to the
overall conclusion reached by Imperial Capital. Each analytical
technique has inherent strengths and weaknesses, and the nature
of the available information may further affect the value of
particular techniques. The conclusion reached by Imperial
Capital is based on all analyses and factors taken, as a whole,
and also on application of Imperial Capitals own
experience and judgment. This conclusion may involve significant
elements of subjective judgment and qualitative analysis.
Imperial Capital gives no opinion as to the value or merit
standing alone of any one or more parts of the analysis it
performed. In performing its analyses, Imperial Capital made
numerous assumptions with respect to Hirschs performance,
the industry outlook, general business and other conditions and
matters many of which are beyond the control of Hirsch or
Imperial Capital. Any estimates contained in these analyses are
not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of
future results or values, which may be significantly more or
less favorable than those suggested by these analyses.
Accordingly, analyses relating to the value of businesses do not
purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which these
businesses actually may be sold in the future, and these
estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty.
In connection with this opinion, Imperial Capital made such
reviews, analyses and inquiries as they deemed necessary and
appropriate under the circumstances. No limits were placed on
Imperial Capital by Hirsch or its board of directors in terms of
the information to which they had access or the matters they
could consider. Imperial Capitals due diligence with
regards to the proposed Merger included only the items
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Hirschs audited financial statements for its fiscal years
ended 2005, 2006 and 2007 prepared and approved by Hirschs
management;
|
|
|
|
Hirschs unaudited financial statements for its
year-to-date ended September 30, 2007 and
September 30, 2008 prepared and approved by Hirschs
management;
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCMs audited financial statements for its fiscal years
ended 2005, 2006 and 2007, as contained in SCMs Annual
Reports on Form
10-K, filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 18, 2008, respectively;
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
SCMs unaudited financial statements for its fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, June 30, 2007 and 2008,
September 30, 2007 and 2008, as contained in SCMs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
filed with the SEC on May 14, 2008, August 12, 2008
and November 10, 2008, respectively;
|
|
|
|
income statement projections for SCM for calendar years
2008 2012 prepared and approved by SCMs
management;
|
|
|
|
income statement projections for Hirsch for calendar years
2008 2012 prepared and approved by Hirschs
management;
|
|
|
|
Hirsch balance sheet dated as of October 31, 2008 prepared
and approved by Hirschs management;
|
|
|
|
an unexecuted merger agreement draft dated November 18,
2008, by and among Hirsch, Merger Sub and SCM, excluding the
schedules and exhibits thereto;
|
|
|
|
certain other publicly available financial data for certain
companies that Imperial Capital deemed comparable or otherwise
relevant to Hirsch or SCM and the terms of recent transactions
that Imperial Capital considered comparable or otherwise
relevant to the Merger, including, without limitation, publicly
available prices; and
|
|
|
|
the reported price and trading activities for the shares of
common stock of SCM.
|
For the purposes of rendering its opinion Imperial Capital
assumed that (a) there were and will be no dissenting
shares in connection with the Merger,
(b) 4,705,735 shares of Hirsch common stock, no par
value, will be outstanding and held by its shareholders as of
immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger, of which
633,000 will be held by Lawrence W. Midland, as of immediately
prior to the effective time of the Merger, and (c) the
Maximum Number of Company Shares as defined in the
merger agreement draft equaled 4,705,735 shares of common
stock. Please note that references in this section entitled
Opinion of Imperial Capital, LLC to the Board of Directors
of Hirsch of this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus to the merger agreement are
references to the draft of the merger agreement described above
dated November 18, 2008 (that did not contained exhibits or
schedules there) that was provided by Hirsch to Imperial Capital
for due diligence purposes in rendering its opinion.
Other than with respect to the Egis Indication (described
below), Imperial Capital was not requested to, and did not,
(i) initiate or participate in any discussions or
negotiations with, or solicit any indications of interest from,
third parties with respect to the Merger, the assets, businesses
or operations of Hirsch, or any alternatives to the Merger,
(ii) negotiate the terms of the Merger, (iii) advise
the board of directors of Hirsch, SCM, or any other party with
respect to alternatives to the Merger, (iv) assist the
Hirsch board of directors in determining the amount of the
consideration to be paid in connection with the Merger, or
(v) recommend to the Hirsch board of directors the amount
of consideration to be paid in connection with the Merger.
Certain principals of Imperial Capital are members of the
general partnership that manages an investment fund named Egis
Capital (Egis). Egis made a preliminary offer to
purchase Hirsch in April 2008 (the Egis Indication),
which offer was rejected by Hirsch, and which is discussed in
the section entitled The Merger Background of
the Development of the Merger.
In connection with its opinion, Imperial Capital conducted such
analyses as it deemed appropriate, however, the information it
utilized in conducting such analyses was limited to solely the
information described above. With respect to financial estimates
and projections provided to Imperial Capital, it assumed without
independent verification that they had been reasonably prepared
on bases reflecting the best then available estimates and
judgments by management as to the future results of operations,
synergies and financial performance of Hirsch and SCM to which
such estimates and projections related and assumed that such
results of operations, synergies and financial performance would
be realized. Imperial Capital also assumed that there had been
no material change in the assets, financial condition or
business of Hirsch or SCM since the date of the most recent
Hirsch and SCM financial statements made available to Imperial
Capital. No facts actually came to Imperial Capitals
attention that would cause it to believe that such assumptions
were invalid as a whole. Imperial Capital further relied upon
the assurance of Hirschs management that they were unaware
of any facts that would make the information provided to
Imperial Capital incomplete or misleading in any material
respect.
72
Imperial Capital did not independently verify the accuracy and
completeness of the information supplied to it with respect to
Hirsch or SCM, relied on it being complete and accurate in all
material respects and did not assume any responsibility for
independent verification of such information. Imperial Capital
did not meet with or have any discussions with any
representatives of SCM or Hirsch (other than members of their
respective senior management) including SCMs and
Hirschs independent accounting firms. Imperial Capital did
not make any physical inspection or independent appraisal of any
of the properties or assets of Hirsch or SCM, did not make an
independent appraisal or evaluation of Hirschs or
SCMs assets or liabilities and was not provided with such
an evaluation or appraisal. Imperial Capital did not estimate,
and expressed no opinion regarding, the liquidation value of any
entity. With Hirschs board of directors consent,
Imperial Capital did not undertake an independent analysis of
any potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible
unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to which
Hirsch or SCM was or may have been a party or was or may have
been subject, or of any governmental investigation of any
possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to
which Hirsch or SCM was or may have been a party or was or may
have been subject.
The merger agreement draft that Imperial Capital was provided
did not contain exhibits or schedules. As such, Imperial Capital
assumed that the fairness to the Non-Insider Shareholders of the
Aggregate Consideration to Non-Insiders was not impacted by the
presence or omission of the schedules and exhibits to the merger
agreement draft. Imperial Capital did not review any ancillary
agreement or any other document, other than as explicitly listed
in the opinion, related to the Merger. Imperial Capital relied
upon and assumed, without independent verification, that
(i) the Merger would be consummated as described in the
form reviewed by Imperial Capital without any material
amendments or modifications thereto, (ii) that all
representations and warranties in the merger agreement draft of
the parties thereto were true and accurate in all respects,
(iii) the Merger would be consummated in a manner that
complied in all respects with all applicable federal and state
statutes, rules and regulations, and (iv) all governmental,
regulatory, and other consents and approvals necessary for the
consummation of the Merger would be obtained and that no delay,
limitations, restrictions or conditions would be imposed or
amendments, modifications or waivers made that would result in
the disposition of any material portion of the assets of Hirsch
or SCM, or otherwise have an adverse effect on Hirsch or SCM or
any expected benefits of the Merger.
Imperial Capital was not requested to opine as to, and its
opinion did not express an opinion as to or otherwise address:
|
|
|
|
|
the underlying business decision of Hirsch or any other party to
proceed with or effect the Merger;
|
|
|
|
the terms or impact of any arrangements, understandings,
agreements or documents related to, or the form or structure or
any other portion or aspect of, the Merger or otherwise (other
than the Aggregate Consideration to Non-Insiders to the extent
expressly specified in the opinion), including, without
limitation, (1) the form or structure of the Aggregate
Consideration to Non-Insiders or any component thereof,
(2) any voting agreement (including but not limited to the
Voting Agreement referenced in the merger agreement draft) or
shareholders agreement (including but not limited to the
Shareholders Agreement referenced in the merger agreement
draft), (3) any options or warrants to acquire Hirsch
securities, (4) the Secure Agreements (as defined in the
merger agreement draft), and (5) the Preferred Stock Rights
Agreement (as defined in the merger agreement draft) or any
waiver of rights thereunder;
|
|
|
|
the impact of any transfer restrictions on the securities of
SCM, whether imposed by law or contract, including, without
limitation, those restrictions contained in the
lock-up
or similar provisions of the merger agreement draft;
|
|
|
|
the fairness of any portion or aspect of the Merger to the
holders of any Hirsch options or warrants;
|
|
|
|
the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any alternative
business strategies that might exist for Hirsch or the effect of
any other transaction in which Hirsch might engage;
|
|
|
|
the fairness of any portion or aspect of the Merger to any one
class or group of Hirschs securityholders vis-à-vis
any other class or group of Hirschs securityholders
(including, without limitation, the allocation of any
consideration amongst or within such classes or groups of
securityholders);
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
the solvency, creditworthiness or fair value of Hirsch or SCM or
any other participant in the Merger under any applicable laws
relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance or
similar matters;
|
|
|
|
any legal, tax or accounting issues concerning the Merger or the
legal or tax consequences of the Merger to Hirsch or its
securityholders or any other party; or
|
|
|
|
the amount or nature of any compensation to any officers,
directors or employees of Hirsch, or any class of such persons,
relative to the consideration to be received by the other
holders of Hirschs common stock in the Merger or with
respect to the fairness of any such compensation.
|
Furthermore, no opinion, counsel or interpretation was intended
or given in matters that require legal, regulatory, accounting,
insurance, tax or other similar professional advice. Imperial
Capital assumed that such opinions, counsel or interpretations
were or would be obtained from appropriate professional sources.
In addition, and without in any way modifying or limiting any
other assumptions or limitations contained in Imperial
Capitals opinion, its opinion does not address or take
into account (i) any of Hirschs royalty agreements or
related party transactions, including but not limited to those
involving Secure Keyboards, Ltd. and Secure Networks, Ltd., or
(ii) whether Hirsch could carry a higher valuation if such
agreements and transactions were eliminated or restructured.
The basis and methodology for Imperial Capitals opinion
have been designed specifically for the express purposes of the
board of directors and may not translate to any other purposes.
To the extent that any of the foregoing assumptions or any of
the facts on which Imperial Capitals opinion is based
proves to be untrue in any material respect, its opinion cannot
and should not be relied upon.
Imperial Capital delivered its opinion effective as of
December 10, 2008, and such opinion was approved by
Imperial Capitals Fairness Opinion Committee as of such
date pursuant to its written procedures for approval of fairness
opinions. The opinion is necessarily based on business,
economic, market and other conditions as they existed and could
be evaluated as of such date. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect the opinion and that Imperial
Capital does not have any obligation to update, revise or
reaffirm the opinion or otherwise comment on or consider events
occurring after such date. For example, Imperial Capital did not
take into account the effect of the Hirsch EMEA purchase on its
opinion since such transaction occurred after the date that
Imperial Capital rendered its opinion.
The decision as to whether to proceed with the Merger or any
related transaction may depend on an assessment of factors
unrelated to the financial analysis on which Imperial
Capitals opinion is based. As a result, the opinion of
Imperial Capital was only one of many factors taken into
consideration by the Hirsch board of directors in making its
determination with respect to the Merger.
In preparing its opinion, Imperial Capital performed certain
financial and comparative analyses summarized in the following
paragraphs.
Valuation
of Merger Consideration
For purposes of rendering its opinion, Imperial Capital assumed
that each share of SCM common stock issued to Hirsch
shareholders in the Merger would have a value equal to the
closing market price of SCM common shares as of December 5,
2008 (which such value was $1.45 per share).
Imperial Capital utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model
to estimate the value of the warrants to purchase SCM common
stock to be issued to the Hirsch shareholders in the Merger.
Because the warrants to be issued to the Hirsch shareholders in
the Merger are not exercisable for three years after
issuance, Imperial Capital arrived at the value of such warrants
by utilizing two estimated values for the warrants, one value
determined by assuming the estimated life of the warrants at
five years and the other determined by assuming the estimated
life of the warrants at three years, and then subtracted the
value of the three year warrants from the value of the five year
warrants.
Other than the estimated life of the warrants to purchase SCM
common stock, Imperial Capital utilized the same sets of
Black-Scholes option pricing assumptions in estimating the
values of both the three-year and five-year
74
warrants, as follows: volatility of 76.58%, a risk free interest
rate of 1.51%, stock price of $1.45 (based on the closing market
price of shares of SCM common stock as of December 5,
2008) and an exercise price of $3.00 per share. Utilizing
such assumptions Imperial Capital estimated the value of the
five-year warrants to be equal to approximately $0.69 per
warrant and estimated the value of the three-year warrants to be
equal to approximately $0.47 per warrant. As described above,
Imperial Capital then subtracted the estimated value of the
three-year warrants from the estimated value of the five year
warrants to arrive at an estimated value of the warrants of
$0.22 per warrant. Imperial Capital utilized such $0.22 value as
the value of the warrants to purchase SCM common stock to be
issued to the Hirsch shareholders in connection with the Merger.
It is important to note that option pricing models require the
use of highly subjective market assumptions, including expected
stock price volatility, which if changed can materially affect
fair value estimates.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Imperial Capital performed a discounted cash flow analysis on
Hirsch to take projected future free cash flow over the given
period along with the terminal value at the end of the period
and then discount these cash flows back to a present value by
using the weighted average cost of capital. Imperial Capital
based its discounted cash flow analysis on management estimates
for financial performance of the business over the analyzed
period (through fiscal year 2012).
In its analysis Imperial Capital used discount rates ranging
from 13.9% to 18.9% to reflect the overall risk associated with
Hirschs operations and projected financial performance.
Imperial Capital calculated a terminal value at the end of 2012
using (1) a terminal earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) multiple,
which incorporated an EBITDA multiple of 7.5x, and (2) a
revenue multiple, which incorporated a revenue multiple of 0.6x.
Based on its discounted cash flow analysis, Imperial Capital
estimated that Hirschs present value of enterprise ranged
from $22.4 million to $34.5 million.
Comparable
Company Analysis
Comparable company analysis seeks to use analogous publicly
traded company trading metrics as a proxy for the trading
metrics of the company. These trading metrics for the comparable
companies were then applied to Hirschs financial metrics
to develop valuation ranges. No company used in this analysis is
identical to Hirsch, and, accordingly, a comparable company
analysis involves complex and subjective considerations and
judgments concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics of businesses and other factors, including, but
not limited to, profitability and the size of the company,
business mix, markets served operations and other
characteristics, that affect trading prices of the various
companies being compared.
Although no exactly analogous publicly traded companies exist,
Imperial Capital selected financial information and multiples
from the ten small cap publicly traded companies in the Access
Control sector listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
Axis AB;
|
|
|
|
Gunnebo AB;
|
|
|
|
GVI Security Solutions Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Kaba Holding AG;
|
|
|
|
Magal Security Systems Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
MDI Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Napco Security Systems Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Primion Technology AG;
|
|
|
|
Vicon Industries Inc.; and
|
|
|
|
Visonic Group.
|
75
Based on percent of contribution by latest twelve-month
(LTM) Revenues and LTM EBITDA, a multiple range was
developed. Using a range of LTM Revenue multiples resulted in an
enterprise value of $10.4 million to $19.9 million.
Using a range of LTM EBITDA multiples resulted in an enterprise
value of $6.5 million to $7.4 million. Using a
industry range of calendar year 2009 revenue multiples resulted
in an enterprise value of $11.7 million to
$22.0 million. Using an industry range of calendar year
2009 EBITDA multiples resulted in an enterprise value of
$18.5 million to $21.9 million.
Comparable
Transaction Analysis
Comparable transaction analysis seeks to use publicly disclosed
transaction data of precedent merger and acquisition
transactions as a proxy for the transaction metrics of Hirsch.
Imperial Capital used available market data to select universes
of comparable mergers and acquisitions based on the following
selection criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
comparable industry;
|
|
|
|
comparable products and services; and/or
|
|
|
|
recently closed transactions.
|
No company or transaction utilized in the comparable transaction
analysis is identical to Hirsch or SCM or the Merger. In
evaluating the comparable transactions Imperial Capital made
judgments and assumptions with regard to general business,
market and financial conditions and other matters, which are
beyond the control of Hirsch and SCM, such as the impact of
competition on the business of Hirsch and SCM or the industry
generally, industry growth and the absence of any adverse
material change in the financial condition of Hirsch or SCM or
the industry or in the financial markets in general, which could
affect the public trading value of the companies and the equity
value of the transactions to which they are being compared.
76
Based on public and other available information, Imperial
Capital applied the financial metrics for the following
comparable transactions to Hirschs financial metrics to
develop valuation ranges.
|
|
|
|
|
Date Closed
|
|
Name of Acquirer
|
|
Name of Target
|
|
7/08/2008(1)
|
|
BATM Advanced Communications Ltd.
|
|
Vigilant Technology
|
10/21/08
|
|
ESML (EQT)
|
|
Securitas Direct Oy
|
10/01/08
|
|
Stanley Works
|
|
Générale de Protection
|
08/28/08
|
|
Vislink plc
|
|
Pacific Microwave Research, Inc.
|
07/18/08
|
|
Stanley Works (NYSE:SWK)
|
|
Sonitrol Corporation
|
07/02/08
|
|
ADT Security Services, Inc.
|
|
Intercon Security and Security Services & Technologies
|
06/04/08
|
|
G4S plc
|
|
Touchcom, Inc.
|
03/05/08
|
|
L-1 Identity Solutions Inc.
|
|
Bioscrypt Inc.
|
02/29/08
|
|
Bosch Security Systems, Inc.
|
|
Extreme CCTV Inc.
|
11/12/07
|
|
EQT Partners AB, Investment AB Latour, Melker Schorling AB and
Sak I AB
|
|
Securitas Direct Oy
|
09/05/07
|
|
Hutton Collins & Company Ltd.
|
|
Everest Ltd.
|
08/01/07
|
|
Schneider Electric SA
|
|
Pelco, Inc.
|
05/14/07
|
|
Linear LLC
|
|
International Electronics Inc.
|
03/30/07
|
|
United Technologies
|
|
Initial Electronic Security Systems
|
01/16/07
|
|
Stanley Works (NYSE:SWK)
|
|
HSM Electronic Protection Services, Inc.
|
12/01/06
|
|
Corel Corp.
|
|
InterVideo, Inc.
|
11/01/06
|
|
Schneider Electric SA
|
|
Get Group PLC
|
10/08/06
|
|
Danaher Corp.
|
|
Vision Systems Ltd.
|
10/01/06
|
|
VASCO Data Security International, Inc.
|
|
Able NV
|
09/03/06
|
|
Assa Abloy AB
|
|
Fargo Electronics
|
09/01/06
|
|
Hitec Industries AS
|
|
Salem Automation Ltd.
|
08/01/06
|
|
Kaba Holding AG
|
|
Computerized Security Systems (Masco Corp.)
|
07/01/06
|
|
Schneider Electric SA
|
|
Invensys Building Systems, Inc. (Invensys PLC)
|
07/01/06
|
|
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.
|
|
TRL Electronics PLC
|
07/01/06
|
|
Extreme CCTV, Inc.
|
|
Forward Vision CCTV Ltd.
|
06/01/06
|
|
Teleste Oyj
|
|
Suomen Turvakamera Oy
|
05/01/06
|
|
UniVision Engineering Ltd.
|
|
T-Com Tech. Co. Ltd.
|
04/01/06
|
|
Central Service Systems
|
|
Toyo Media Links
|
01/01/06
|
|
Upper Point Manufacturing Ltd. (Private Group)
|
|
Upperpoint Manufacturing Ltd.
|
01/01/06
|
|
Integrian, Inc.
|
|
Innovonics Ltd.
|
12/01/05
|
|
Honeywell Industries
|
|
First Technology
|
11/01/05
|
|
Securidev SA
|
|
DOM Sicherheitstechnik (The Black & Decker Corp.)
|
08/01/05
|
|
Integrian, Inc.
|
|
Digital Safety Technologies
|
07/01/05
|
|
CBORD Group
|
|
Diebold Card Systems (Diebold)
|
05/01/05
|
|
Axsys Technologies
|
|
Diversified Optical Products, Inc.
|
04/01/05
|
|
United Technologies
|
|
Kidde plc
|
03/01/05
|
|
General Electric
|
|
Edwards Systems Technology
|
03/01/05
|
|
United Technologies
|
|
Lenel
|
77
Based on LTM Revenues and LTM EBITDA, a multiple range was
developed. Using a range of LTM Revenue multiples resulted in an
enterprise value of $44.8 million to $54.3 million.
Using a range of LTM EBITDA multiples resulted in an enterprise
value of $11.7 million to $12.6 million.
Summary
Analysis
Based on the foregoing analysis, Imperial Capital concluded that
as of December 10, 2008, the Aggregate Consideration to
Non-Insiders was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
Non-Insider Shareholders.
The material analyses performed by Imperial Capital have been
summarized above. Nonetheless, the summary set forth above does
not purport to be a complete description of the analyses
performed by Imperial Capital. Imperial Capital did not form a
conclusion as to whether any individual analysis, considered in
isolation, supported or failed to support an opinion as to
fairness. Rather, in reaching its conclusion, Imperial Capital
considered the results of the analyses in light of each other
and ultimately reached its opinion based on the results of all
analyses taken as a whole.
The analyses Imperial Capital conducted do not purport to be
appraisals or to reflect prices at which a company might
actually be sold or the prices at which any securities may trade
at the present time or at any time in the future. Imperial
Capital relied on management-prepared projections of future
performance for Hirsch and SCM. The projections were based on
numerous variables and assumptions, which are inherently
unpredictable and must be considered not certain of occurrence
as projected. Accordingly, actual results could vary
significantly from those assumed in the projections and any
related analyses. Imperial Capitals opinion does not
address the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any
alternative business strategies that might exist for Hirsch or
the effect of any other business combination in which Hirsch
might engage.
Other
Imperial Capitals opinion should not be construed as
creating any fiduciary duty on its part to any party to the
Merger. Imperial Capital did not act as financial advisor to the
board of directors of Hirsch or SCM or to any other party to the
Merger. Imperial Capital will not receive any consideration or
other compensation that is contingent upon the successful
completion of the Merger. Imperial Capital received a fee for
providing its opinion, which was paid by Hirsch. Hirsch has also
agreed to reimburse Imperial Capitals expenses incurred in
rendering its opinion and to indemnify Imperial Capital against
certain liabilities arising out of Imperial Capitals
engagement in connection therewith. Imperial Capitals fee
was not contingent upon consummation of the Merger. Imperial
Capital does not actively trade the debt or equity securities of
SCM or Hirsch for its own accounts or for the accounts of
customers. There is no material relationship that existed during
the past two years or is mutually understood to be contemplated
in which any compensation was received or is intended to be
received by Imperial Capital as a result of the relationship
between Imperial Capital, SCM, Hirsch, or any other party to the
Merger. However, Imperial Capital is regularly engaged in a
broad range of investment banking and financial advisory
activities, including activities relating to corporate finance,
mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts and private
placements, and thus may provide investment banking, financial
advisory and other financial services to the SCM, Hirsch, and
other participants in the Merger
and/or
certain of their respective affiliates in the future, for which
Imperial Capital may receive compensation.
As discussed above in this section, Egis Capital, an investment
fund that is managed by a general partnership that certain
principals of Imperial Capital are members of made a preliminary
offer to purchase the assets of Hirsch, which offer was rejected
by Hirsch in April 2008.
Interests
of SCM Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
To the knowledge of SCM, no director or executive officer of
SCM, nor any of their affiliates, have any interests in the
Merger that differ from, or are in addition to, their interests
as SCM stockholders. As of the record date for the SCM special
meeting, the directors and executive officers of SCM, together
with their affiliates, owned in the aggregate approximately
1,683,452 shares of SCM common stock, entitling them to
exercise approximately 11% of the voting power of the SCM common
stock at the SCM special meeting. SCM cannot complete the Merger
unless the issuance of the shares of SCM common stock and
warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock in
78
connection with the Merger is approved by the affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of the shares of SCM common stock
voting at the SCM special meeting.
In addition, as of the record date for the SCM special meeting,
the directors and executive officers of SCM, together with their
affiliates, held in the aggregate options to purchase
approximately 404,096 shares of SCM common stock. These
options and any shares of SCM common stock issued upon the
exercise thereof will not be entitled to vote at the SCM special
meeting.
Interests
of Hirsch Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger
In considering the recommendation of the Hirsch board of
directors with respect to adopting the Merger Agreement, Hirsch
shareholders should be aware that certain members of the Hirsch
Board of Directors and certain executive officers of Hirsch have
interests in the Merger that may be different from, or in
addition to, interests they may have as Hirsch shareholders. The
Hirsch board of directors was aware of these potential conflicts
of interest and considered them, among other matters, in
reaching their decision to approve the Merger Agreement and the
Merger, and to recommend that the Hirsch shareholders approve
the Hirsch proposals to be presented to the Hirsch shareholders
for consideration at the Hirsch special meeting as contemplated
by this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus.
Ownership
Interests
As of the record date for the Hirsch special meeting, the
directors and executive officers of Hirsch, together with their
affiliates, owned in the aggregate approximately
1,021,456 of the shares of Hirsch common stock, entitling
them to exercise approximately 22% of the voting power of the
Hirsch common stock at the Hirsch special meeting. Hirsch cannot
complete the Merger unless the Merger is approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
Hirsch common stock as of the record date for the Hirsch special
meeting. Each current Hirsch director and all of Hirschs
executive officers, and their affiliates, have entered into an
irrevocable proxy and voting agreement in connection with the
Merger and have granted irrevocable proxies appointing SCM their
lawful proxy and attorney-in-fact to vote at any meeting of
Hirsch shareholders called for purposes of considering whether
to approve the Merger and Merger Agreement. For a more detailed
discussion of the voting agreement see the section entitled
Certain Agreements Related to the Merger
Irrevocable Proxy and Voting Agreement in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus.
In addition, as of the record date for the Hirsch special
meeting, the directors and executive officers of Hirsch,
together with their affiliates, held in the aggregate options
and warrants to purchase approximately 57,000 shares of
Hirsch common stock. These options and warrants and any shares
of Hirsch common stock issued upon the exercise thereof will not
be entitled to vote at the Hirsch special meeting.
79
Hirsch has previously granted compensatory warrants to purchase
shares of Hirsch common stock to each of Eugene Mak, Maury
Polner and Doug Morgan (each, a director of Hirsch), and to an
affiliate of Ayman Ashour, a former director of Hirsch, for
their services as directors of Hirsch. As of the date of this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus,
compensatory warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of Hirsch
common stock were outstanding. As listed on the following table,
holders of these warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock could
exercise these warrants to purchase shares of Hirsch common
stock prior to the closing of the Merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Subject to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price per
|
|
Name
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
|
Hirsch Share
|
|
|
Eugene Mak
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5/6/1999
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
Eugene Mak
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5/3/2000
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
Eugene Mak
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5/3/2001
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Eugene Mak
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5/2/2002
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Eugene Mak
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5/8/2003
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Eugene Mak
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
5/5/2004
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Eugene Mak
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
5/6/2005
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
Eugene Mak
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
6/14/2006
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
Eugene Mak
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
6/13/2007
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Doug Morgan
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
6/13/2007
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Newton International Management, LLC
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
6/13/2007
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Maury Polner
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5/6/1999
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
Maury Polner
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5/3/2000
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
Maury Polner
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5/3/2001
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Maury Polner
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5/2/2002
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Maury Polner
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5/8/2003
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Maury Polner
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
5/5/2004
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Maury Polner
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
5/6/2005
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
Maury Polner
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
6/14/2006
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
Maury Polner
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
6/13/2007
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
The Merger Agreement provides that each of the Hirsch warrants
which has not been exercised as of the effective time of the
Merger will convert into warrants to purchase SCM common stock
subject to certain restrictions. For a more detailed discussion
of the Hirsch warrants and conversion see the section entitled
The Merger Agreement Merger
Consideration Treatment of Hirsch Options and
Warrants and Certain Agreements Related to the
Merger Warrants in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus.
Warrant
Compensation to Hirsch Outside Directors
The outside directors of Hirsch (i.e., directors other
than Lawrence W. Midland) have not been compensated for their
services as directors of Hirsch for periods after May 2007. The
Merger Agreement provides that upon consummation of the Merger,
SCM will issue warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
to Eugene Mak, Maury Polner and Doug Morgan (each, a director of
Hirsch), and to Ayman Ashour, a former director of Hirsch, with
the number of shares subject to the warrants to be determined
based on what otherwise would have been the result of the
conversion under the Merger Agreement of warrants to purchase
3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock. The exercise price of
the warrants will be $3.00 per share of SCM common stock.
Employment
Agreements
In connection with the Merger, each of Lawrence W. Midland,
Robert Beliles, John Piccininni and Robert Zivney, the executive
officers of Hirsch, have entered into an employment agreement
with Hirsch to become effective upon the effective time of the
Merger. The employment agreements set forth the terms of such
individuals
80
employment with the Surviving Subsidiary and, with respect to
Mr. Midland, SCM, after the effective time of the Merger.
As a condition to the obligation of SCM to complete the Merger,
three out of the four above described employment agreements,
including the employment agreement with Lawrence W. Midland,
must remain in effect as of the closing date of the Merger. For
a more detailed discussion of the employment agreements with the
Hirsch executive officers, see the section entitled
Certain Agreements Related to the Merger
Employment Agreements with Hirsch Executive Officers in
this joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus.
Interests
in the Settlement Agreement
Effective November 1994, Hirsch entered into a settlement
agreement with two limited partnerships, Keyboards and Networks.
Hirsch had previously obtained funding and the exclusive rights
to certain patents and technology from Secure Keyboards, Ltd.
(in 1981) and Secure Networks, Ltd. (in 1986). The
settlement agreement provides that (as a clarification of the
agreements entered into in 1981 and 1986), Hirsch is obligated
to pay royalties based on Hirsch gross revenues to Secure
Keyboards, Ltd. for the period from December 1, 1994 to
December 31, 2020 and to Secure Networks, Ltd. for the
period from December 1, 1994 to December 31, 2011.
The following individuals, each of whom is a director of Hirsch,
hold an interest in Secure Keyboards, Ltd.
and/or
Secure Networks, Ltd. as set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest in Secure
|
|
|
Interest in Secure
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Keyboards
|
|
|
Networks
|
|
|
Lawrence W. Midland
|
|
Hirsch Director and President
|
|
|
29.93
|
%
|
|
|
6.59
|
%
|
Eugene Mak
|
|
Hirsch Director
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
Doug Morgan
|
|
Hirsch Director
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
16.36
|
%
|
Lawrence W. Midland is also one of four general partners of
Secure Keyboards, Ltd. and one of two general partners of Secure
Networks, Ltd.
To the extent that consummation of the Merger results in an
increase in the amount of Hirsch revenues, the amount of
royalties payable under the settlement agreement will increase.
Keyboards
and Networks Letters of Understanding
In connection with the signing of the Merger Agreement, Robert
J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland, as two of the four general
partners of Keyboards, delivered a letter of understanding to
SCM, as amended and restated. In addition, Robert J. Parsons and
Lawrence W. Midland, as the two general partners of Networks,
delivered a substantially similar letter of understanding to
SCM, as amended and restated. For more information regarding the
letter of understanding delivered to SCM, see the section
entitled Certain Agreements Related to the
Merger Keyboards and Networks Letters of
Understanding in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
Among other conditions, the obligation of SCM and Merger Subs to
complete the Merger is subject to SCMs receipt or waiver
of the following consents related to the settlement agreement
and related letters of understanding:
|
|
|
|
|
the consent to the Merger and waiver of any rights to notice by
Keyboards and Networks pursuant to the terms of the settlement
agreement, executed by each respective general partner; and
|
|
|
|
the consent of each of the two other of the four general
partners of Keyboards who have not delivered a consent to become
a party to and bound by the letter of understanding delivered to
SCM by Robert J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland, as general
partners of Keyboard.
|
On February 9, 2009 and February 11, 2009, counsel
representing the two general partners of Keyboards who are not
currently a party to the letter of understanding sent
communications to SCM and Hirsch objecting to the letter of
understanding, and indicating that the two general partners will
not sign the letter of understanding. There can be no assurance
that any disagreements relating to the letter of understanding
can be resolved amicably between the parties. If the parties are
not able to resolve the matter, a condition to SCMs
obligation to close the Merger will not be satisfied and, if SCM
decides not to waive this condition, the Merger will not be
consummated.
81
If SCM decides to waive this closing condition and the Merger is
consummated without the consent of the two other general
partners of Keyboards, SCM and Hirsch face the risk of
litigation being brought by these two general partners relating
to the settlement agreement and the amount of royalties to which
Keyboards is entitled. There is no guarantee that SCM and Hirsch
will prevail in any such litigation and SCMs results of
operations may be materially harmed as a result of the
litigation, in addition to diverting managements attention
away from operations to attend to the litigation.
For a more detailed discussion of the settlement agreement and
the letters of understanding see the sections entitled
Certain Agreements Related to the Merger
Settlement Agreement and Certain Agreements Related
to the Merger Keyboards and Networks Letters of
Understanding in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
Appointment
of Lawrence W. Midland to SCM Board of Directors
The Merger Agreement provides that, as a condition precedent to
Hirschs obligation to close the Merger, Lawrence W.
Midland, a Hirsch director and the President of Hirsch, will be
appointed to the SCM board of directors immediately following
the effective time of the Merger. The Stockholder Agreement
permits the stockholders who are parties to the agreement to
vote at their discretion regarding the re-election or
non-removal of Lawrence M. Midland to or from the SCM board of
directors, which is an exception from their other obligations
pursuant to the Stockholder Agreement to vote, for a period of
three years beginning on the effective date of the Merger, in
favor of electing directors, or to vote to remove directors, in
each case as recommended by SCMs board of directors. In
the event that Lawrence W. Midland is not nominated for
re-election at the 2009 annual meeting of SCM stockholders, or
is otherwise involuntarily removed without cause from SCMs
board of directors, the voting obligation under the Stockholder
Agreement to vote in accordance with the SCM board of
directors recommendation terminates.
Hirsch
EMEA, Inc. Stock Purchase
As a condition to the closing of the Merger, Hirsch entered into
a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated December 15,
2008, for the purchase of the approximately 70.6% of the
outstanding shares of capital stock of Hirsch EMEA, Inc., a
British Virgin Island corporation, not already owned by Hirsch.
One of the parties from which Hirsch purchased shares of Hirsch
EMEA, Inc. was tSecu, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability
company which is an affiliate of Ayman Ashour, a former director
of Hirsch. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase and Sale
Agreement, tSecu, LLC, received $260,000 and 52,000 shares
of Hirsch (now held by Mr. Ashour) in exchange for the
approximately 37.5% of the outstanding Hirsch EMEA, Inc. shares
owned by tSecu, LLC. Nicola Caletti, President of Hirsch EMEA,
Inc., received $240,000 and 48,000 shares of Hirsch in
exchange for the approximately 33% of the outstanding Hirsch
EMEA, Inc. shares owned by him. Pursuant to the terms of the
Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement, Hirsch also acquired options
to purchase all or any portion of the outstanding capital of a
Hirsch EMEA, Inc. subsidiary. This transaction closed on
December 15, 2008 and Hirsch EMEA, Inc. is now a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Hirsch. For a more detailed
discussion of the Hirsch EMEA purchase, see the section entitled
Certain Agreements Related to the Merger
Settlement Agreement and Certain Agreements Related
to the Merger Hirsch EMEA, Inc. Stock Purchase
in this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus.
Indemnification
of Hirsch Officers and Directors
The Merger Agreement provides that, for a period of three years
following the effective time of the Merger, and to the extent of
insurance coverage, for three additional years, the surviving
entity of the Merger will, to the fullest extent permitted by
law, indemnify and hold harmless the Hirsch directors and
officers serving as of the date of the Merger Agreement against
all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, judgments, costs and
expenses, including reasonable attorneys fees, actually
and reasonably incurred and arising from any claim, action,
suit, proceeding or investigation pertaining to the fact that
such person is or was a director or officer of Hirsch, subject
to certain exceptions.
The Merger Agreement also provides that, for a period of six
years following the effective time of the Merger, the surviving
entity of the Merger will maintain, in effect, a directors
and officers liability insurance policy
82
covering the directors and officers of Hirsch, with coverage in
amount and scope at least as favorable as the coverage under the
existing Hirsch policy at the time the Merger becomes effective;
provided, that the aggregate premiums for such policy do
not exceed $50,000.
Merger
Consideration
At the effective time of the Merger, each share of Hirsch common
stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective
time of the Merger (other than (i) shares held by SCM or
the Merger Subs, (ii) shares held by Hirsch as treasury
stock, and (iii) any dissenting shares), will be
automatically converted into and thereafter represent the right
to receive $3.00 cash, without interest and less any applicable
withholding taxes, two shares of SCM common stock, and a warrant
to purchase one share of SCM common stock at an exercise price
equal to $3.00 per share and a five year term, exercisable for
two years following the third anniversary of the effective time
of the Merger (the merger consideration). The merger
consideration will be appropriately and proportionately adjusted
to reflect any stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification,
recapitalization, split, combination, or exchange of shares with
respect to SCM common stock between the date of the Merger
Agreement and the effective time of the Merger.
In addition, as provided for by the Merger Agreement, the
maximum aggregate amount of merger consideration that SCM is
required to pay in connection with the merger, excluding any
amount that SCM is required to pay with respect to dissenting
shares, is equal to the maximum number of Hirsch
shares permitted under the Merger Agreement, multiplied by each
component of the merger consideration described above. This
maximum number of Hirsch shares is calculated to be
equal to the sum of 4,705,735 Hirsch shares, plus shares issued
in connection with the exercise of options and warrants between
the date of the Merger Agreement and the closing of the Merger,
minus the number of dissenting shares, minus shares held by SCM
or Merger Subs and Hirsch shares held by Hirsch as treasury
stock. In the event that the actual number of shares of Hirsch
common stock at the effective time of the Merger exceeds the
maximum number of Hirsch shares, then the aggregate
merger consideration will be allocated pro rata among the actual
number of shares of Hirsch common stock outstanding at the
effective time in lieu of the per share allocation described in
the paragraph above.
Treatment
of Options and Warrants
Treatment
of Options
At the effective time of the Merger, each option to purchase
shares of Hirsch common stock outstanding and unexercised
immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will be
terminated and cancelled, and neither SCM, the Merger Subs, nor
the surviving entity will assume or be bound by any obligation
with respect to such options.
83
The following table lists all of the options to purchase shares
of Hirsch common stock that are outstanding as of
February 10, 2009. Holders of these options to purchase
Hirsch common stock could exercise these options to purchase
shares of Hirsch common stock prior to the closing of the Merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Subject to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price per
|
|
Name
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
|
Hirsch Share
|
|
|
Charles Baden
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4/6/1999
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
Patrick Chao
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
4/6/1999
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
Patrick Chao
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
6/8/2004
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Chhiv Chauv
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
6/8/2004
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Cynthia L. Doyle
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1/31/2003
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Anthony Scott Elliott
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1/31/2003
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Patrick Finnegan
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4/9/2004
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Thomas S. Friesema
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1/31/2003
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Delfino Gonzales
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
7/13/1999
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
Randall S. Lehman
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1/31/2003
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Keith Milleson
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
4/6/1999
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
Bernice E. Noriz
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1/31/2003
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Douglas H. Smith
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1/31/2003
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Lars Suneborn
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4/6/1999
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
Robert C. Zivney
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
2/2/2006
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
Treatment
of Warrants
At the effective time of the Merger, the Merger Agreement
provides that each warrant to purchase shares of Hirsch common
stock outstanding and not terminated or exercised immediately
prior to the effective time of the Merger will be converted into
a warrant to purchase the number of shares of SCM common stock
equal to the number of shares of Hirsch common stock that could
have been purchased upon the full exercise of such warrant,
multiplied by the conversion ratio, rounded down to the nearest
whole share. The per share exercise price for each new warrant
to purchase SCM common stock will be determined by dividing the
per share exercise price of the Hirsch common stock subject to
each warrant as in effect immediately prior to the effective
time of the Merger by the conversion ratio, and rounding that
result up to the nearest cent.
Conversion
Ratio
As used in this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus, the term conversion ratio means the
quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate value of the merger
consideration per share, divided by the
30-day
volume weighted average price of SCMs common stock (as
reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market) during the 30 days
preceding the day prior to the day of the effective time of the
Merger. The warrants will be valued using the Black-Scholes
American option model.
By way of illustration only, based on the
30-day
volume weighted price of SCMs common stock $2.54, and the
aggregate value of the merger consideration per share was
estimated to be $8.38 (calculated as the cash merger
consideration per share, plus the 30-day volume weighted price
of SCMs common stock, plus the estimated value of the
warrant merger consideration per share value, based on
Black-Scholes valuation modeling), the conversion
ratio would be equal to 3.29 (the quotient obtained by
dividing $8.38 by $2.54). Applying this ratio to 3,000 warrants
to purchase shares of Hirsch common stock each with an exercise
price of $10.00 per share, would result in warrants to purchase
9,877 shares of SCM common stock (the result of 3,000
warrants multiplied by the conversion ratio) with an exercise
price of $3.04 per share (the result of $10.00 per share
exercise price divided by the conversion ratio).
The conversion ratio to be actually used in connection with the
Merger will be determined as of the effective time of the Merger
and may be different than as calculated above.
84
Letter
of Transmittal; Exchange of Shares
Prior to the effective time of the Merger, SCM will deposit with
a paying agent reasonably acceptable to Hirsch, cash, stock
certificates and warrants sufficient to pay the merger
consideration for each outstanding share of Hirsch common stock
and warrants to exchange for the outstanding warrants to
purchase Hirsch common stock. As soon as reasonably practicable
after the completion of the Merger, the paying agent will mail a
letter of transmittal and instructions to each holder of record
as of immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger of
Hirsch common stock and warrants to purchase Hirsch common
stock. The letter of transmittal and instructions will inform
holders of Hirsch common stock and warrants to purchase Hirsch
common stock how to surrender their Hirsch common stock
certificates and Hirsch warrant certificates in exchange for
receiving merger consideration or warrants to purchase shares of
SCM common stock, as the case may be. Until surrendered, no
portion of the merger consideration or warrants to purchase
shares of SCM common stock will be paid to any holder of any
Hirsch stock or warrant certificate.
If any Hirsch stock certificate or Hirsch warrant certificate
has been lost, stolen or destroyed, SCM may, in its discretion,
and as a condition to the delivery of merger consideration or
warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock, require the
owner of such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate to deliver
an affidavit claiming such certificate has been lost, stolen or
destroyed, provide an indemnification agreement and, if
determined by SCM in good faith to be necessary, to post a bond
indemnifying SCM against any claim suffered by SCM or the Merger
Subs with respect to the certificates alleged to have been lost,
stolen or destroyed.
After the effective time of the Merger, Hirschs transfer
books will be closed and there will be no further transfers of
any shares of Hirschs common stock that were outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time, and each holder of a
certificate representing any shares of Hirsch common stock or
warrants to purchase shares of Hirsch common stock will no
longer have any rights with respect to such shares or warrants,
except for the right to receive, for each share or warrant
represented by the certificate, the applicable merger
consideration or warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
as described above.
Appraisal
Rights and Dissenters Rights
Rights
of SCM Stockholders
SCM stockholders are not entitled to dissenters rights or
appraisal rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law in
connection with the Merger.
Rights
of Hirsch Shareholders
Hirsch shareholders are entitled to exercise dissenters
rights in connection with the Merger under the provisions of
Sections 1300 through 1304 of Chapter 13 of the
California Corporations Code relating to the rights of
dissenting shareholders in the context of a merger.
The discussion below is not a complete summary regarding the
dissenters rights of Hirsch shareholders under the
California Corporations Code, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the text of the relevant provisions of the
California Corporations Code attached to this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus as
Annex O. Hirsch shareholders intending to exercise
dissenters rights should carefully review
Annex O. Failure to follow precisely any of the
statutory procedures set forth in Annex O may result
in loss or waiver of dissenters rights. This summary does
not constitute legal or other advice, nor is it a recommendation
that Hirsch shareholders exercise dissenters rights under
California law.
Even though a Hirsch shareholder wishing to exercise
dissenters rights may be required to take certain actions
before the effective time of the Merger, if the Merger Agreement
is later terminated and the Merger is abandoned, no shareholder
of Hirsch will have the right to any payment from Hirsch by
reason of having taken that action. The following discussion is
subject to this qualification.
Within ten days after the approval of the Merger by Hirsch
shareholders, Hirsch will mail a notice of approval to each
holder of Hirsch common stock who did not vote their shares of
Hirsch common stock in favor of the Merger. This notice of
approval must include a statement of the price determined by
Hirsch to be the relevant fair market value of the shares of
Hirsch common stock, which statement will constitute an offer by
Hirsch to purchase shares of Hirsch common stock that qualify as
dissenting shares at the stated price if the Merger
becomes
85
effective, unless such shares lose their status as
dissenting shares under Section 1309 of the
California Corporations Code. Chapter 13 of the California
Corporations Code provides that the fair market value, for this
purpose, is determined as of the day before the first
announcement of the Merger, excluding any appreciation or
depreciation as a consequence of the announcement of the Merger.
The notice of approval must also include a brief description of
the procedures to be followed by Hirsch shareholders who wish to
exercise their dissenters rights and a copy of
Sections 1300 through 1304 of Chapter 13 of the
California Corporations Code.
To exercise dissenters rights as to any of your shares of
Hirsch common stock in connection with the Merger, you must not
vote the Hirsch shares in favor of either the Merger or the
Merger Agreement, and you must make a written demand to have
Hirsch purchase your Hirsch shares at their fair market value.
The written demand must:
|
|
|
|
|
be received by Hirsch within 30 days after the date on
which the notice of approval is mailed to you by Hirsch (as
described above);
|
|
|
|
specify the number and class of Hirsch shares held of record by
you which you demand Hirsch purchase;
|
|
|
|
state that you are demanding purchase of your Hirsch shares and
payment of their fair market value; and
|
|
|
|
include a statement of the price you claim to be the fair market
value of the Hirsch shares as of the day before the announcement
of the terms of the Merger, which statement will constitute an
offer by you to sell your Hirsch shares to Hirsch at that price.
|
All written demands should be addressed to:
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
1900 Carnegie Avenue, Building B
Santa Ana, California 92705
Attention: President
In addition, within 30 days after the date on which the
notice of approval is mailed to you by Hirsch, you must submit
to Hirsch or its transfer agent the stock certificate(s)
representing the Hirsch shares as to which you wish to exercise
dissenters rights.
Under Chapter 13 of the California Corporations Code, a
dissenting Hirsch shareholder may not withdraw the demand for
payment of the fair market value of the shareholders
dissenting Hirsch shares in cash unless Hirsch consents.
If the shareholder and Hirsch agree that the shares of Hirsch
common stock as to which the shareholder is seeking
dissenters rights qualify as dissenting shares and also
agree upon the price to be paid to purchase the Hirsch shares,
then the dissenting shareholder is entitled to the agreed price
with interest thereon at the legal rate on judgments from the
date of the agreement. Any agreements fixing the fair market
value of any dissenting shares as between Hirsch and any
dissenting Hirsch shareholder must be filed with the Secretary
of Hirsch.
However, if Hirsch disputes that the shareholders Hirsch
shares qualify as dissenting shares or Hirsch and
the dissenting shareholder fail to agree upon the fair market
value of the dissenting shares, then within six months after the
date on which Hirsch mailed the notice of approval, the Hirsch
shareholder must either file a complaint in the California
Superior Court of the proper county requesting the court to make
these determinations or intervene in a pending action brought by
another dissenting Hirsch shareholder. If the dissenting Hirsch
shareholder does not file a complaint or intervene in a pending
action within the specified six-month period, the
dissenters rights are lost.
If the court determines that the shareholders Hirsch
shares qualify as dissenting shares, then, following
determination of their fair market value, Hirsch will be
obligated to pay the dissenting Hirsch shareholder the fair
market value of the Hirsch shares, as so determined, together
with interest thereon at the legal rate from the date on which
judgment is entered. Payment on this judgment will be due upon
the endorsement and delivery to Hirsch of the stock
certificate(s) for the Hirsch shares as to which the
dissenters rights are being exercised. Any party may
appeal from the judgment.
In determining the fair market value of the dissenting Hirsch
shares, the court may appoint one or more impartial appraisers
to make the determination. Within ten days of their appointment,
the appraiser, or a majority of
86
them, will make and file a report with the court. If the
appraisers cannot determine the fair market value within ten
days of their appointment, or within a longer time determined by
the court, or the court does not confirm their report, then the
court will determine the fair market value. The costs of the
appraisal action, including reasonable compensation to the
appraisers appointed by the court, will be allocated between
Hirsch and dissenting Hirsch shareholder as the court deems
equitable. However, if the appraisal of the fair market value of
the Hirsch shares exceeds the price offered by Hirsch in the
notice of approval, then Hirsch shall pay the costs. If the fair
market value of the shares awarded by the court exceeds 125% of
the price offered by Hirsch, then the court may in its
discretion impose additional costs on Hirsch, including
attorneys fees, fees of expert witnesses and interest.
Hirsch shareholders considering whether to exercise
dissenters rights should consider that the fair market
value of their Hirsch common stock determined under
Chapter 13 of the California Corporations Code could be
more than, the same as or less than the value of merger
consideration to be paid in connection with the Merger, as set
forth in the Merger Agreement. Also, Hirsch reserves the right
to assert in any appraisal proceeding that, for purposes
thereof, the fair market value of the Hirsch common stock is
less than the value of the merger consideration to be issued and
paid in connection with the Merger, as set forth in the Merger
Agreement.
Strict compliance with certain technical prerequisites is
required to exercise dissenters rights. Hirsch
shareholders wishing to exercise dissenters rights should
consult with their own legal counsel in connection with
compliance with Chapter 13 of the California Corporations
Code. Any Hirsch shareholder who fails to comply with the
requirements of Chapter 13 of the California Corporations
Code, attached as Annex O to this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus, will forfeit the
right to exercise dissenters rights and will, instead,
receive the merger consideration to be issued and paid in
connection with the Merger, as set forth in the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement provides that SCM will not be required to
complete the Merger if dissenters rights have been
exercised with respect to 10% or more, in the aggregate, of all
outstanding Hirsch common stock. As a result, exercise of
dissenters rights with respect to 10% or more of the
outstanding shares of Hirsch common stock could prevent the
Merger from going forward. SCM is entitled to waive this
requirement and permit the Merger to proceed even if 10% or more
of the outstanding Hirsch common stock exercise dissenters
rights.
NASDAQ
Listing of SCM Shares Issued in Connection with the
Merger
SCM will use commercially reasonable efforts to cause all shares
of SCM common stock to be issued in connection with the Merger
and all shares of SCM common stock to be issued upon exercise of
the warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock to be listed
on the NASDAQ Stock Market and the Prime Standard of the
Frankfurt Stock Exchange as of the effective time of the Merger,
and the Merger Agreement provides that neither SCM nor Hirsch
will be required to complete the Merger if the shares of SCM
common stock to be issued in connection with the Merger are not
approved for listing, subject to notice of issuance, on the
NASDAQ Stock Market.
Effective
Time of the Merger
The Merger will be completed and become effective at the time
Merger Sub 1 merges with and into Hirsch and the certificate of
merger is filed with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware. The parties intend to complete the Merger as soon as
practicable following the approval and adoption of the Merger
Agreement and the issuance of the shares of SCM common stock in
connection with the Merger by each of the Hirsch shareholders
and SCM stockholders, respectively, and the satisfaction or
waiver of the conditions to closing of the Merger set forth in
the Merger Agreement. The parties to the Merger Agreement
currently anticipate that the Merger will be completed sometime
in the first half of 2009. However, because the Merger is
subject to a number of conditions, the exact timing of the
completion of the Merger cannot be determined with any
certainty, if it is completed at all.
As soon as reasonably practicable after Merger Sub 1 merges with
and into Hirsch, Hirsch will merge with and into Merger Sub 2,
with Merger Sub 2 as the surviving entity. As a result of the
mergers, the business and assets of Hirsch will be held by a new
Delaware limited liability company that will be a wholly-owned
subsidiary of SCM.
87
The Board
of Directors and Management of SCM and Hirsch Following the
Merger
After completion of the Merger, the SCM board of directors will
consist of eight directors, including Lawrence W. Midland, who
is expected to join SCMs board of directors immediately
after the effective time of the Merger, filling an existing
vacancy. SCM currently anticipates that the following
individuals will serve as its board of directors immediately
following completion of the Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Werner Koepf
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Dr. Hagen Hultzsch
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director
|
Steven Humphreys
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Director
|
Dr. Hans Liebler
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Director
|
Felix Marx
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Lawrence W. Midland
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Director
|
Stephan Rohaly
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Director
|
Simon Turner
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
SCM and Hirsch have agreed that, upon completion of the Merger,
SCMs officers will remain as they existed prior to the
Merger, with the exception that Lawrence W. Midland is expected
to join the management of SCM as an Executive Vice President.
As a result of the Merger, the Surviving Subsidiary will be a
new Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of SCM. The Surviving Subsidiary will have no
directors and will be managed by SCM as the sole member.
Ownership
of SCM Following the Merger
After the Merger, Hirsch will continue as a wholly-owned
subsidiary of SCM, and Hirsch shareholders will no longer have
any interest in Hirsch, but will have an equity stake in SCM,
the new parent company of Hirschs operations. Immediately
after the Merger, existing SCM stockholders are expected to own
approximately 63% of the outstanding shares of SCM common stock
and the former Hirsch shareholders are expected to own
approximately 37% of the outstanding shares of SCM common stock.
Upon attributing ownership to the former Hirschs
shareholders of the shares of common stock that may be issued
upon exercise of the warrants to purchase SCM common stock
issued in the Merger and assuming no options to purchase Hirsch
common stock are exercised prior to the consummation of the
Merger, and assuming that existing SCM stockholders do not
change their current stock and option holdings during such time,
existing SCM stockholders and option holders would own
approximately 55% of the common stock of SCM on a fully diluted
basis and the former Hirsch shareholders would own approximately
45% of the common stock of SCM on a fully diluted basis.
For detailed information regarding the beneficial ownership of
certain key stockholders of the combined company prior to and
after consummation of the Merger, see the sections entitled
Principal Stockholders of SCM Microsystems and
Principal Shareholders of Hirsch Electronics in this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment
SCM will account for the Merger as a purchase of the business,
which means that the assets and liabilities of Hirsch will be
recorded at their fair value and the results of operations of
Hirsch will be included in SCMs results from and after the
effective time of the Merger. The purchase method of accounting
is based on Financial Accounting Standard No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)). The provisions of
SFAS No. 141(R) are to be applied prospectively to
business combinations with acquisition dates on or after the
beginning of an entitys fiscal year that begins on or
after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited.
Since SCMs acquisition of Hirsch will close in fiscal year
2009, the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) are applied.
88
MATERIAL
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE
MERGER
The following discussion of material U.S. federal income
tax consequences of the Merger to Hirsch shareholders and
warrant holders is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, the related Treasury regulations, administrative
interpretations, and court decisions, all of which are subject
to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Any such change
could affect the accuracy of the statements and the conclusions
discussed below and the presently anticipated tax consequences
of the Merger. This discussion applies only to Hirsch
shareholders and warrant holders that hold their shares of
Hirsch common stock and warrants to purchase shares of Hirsch
common stock, and will hold any shares of SCM common stock and
warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock received in
exchange therefor, as capital assets within the meaning of
Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. This discussion does not address all federal income tax
consequences of the Merger that may be relevant to particular
Hirsch shareholders or warrant holders, including shareholders
or warrant holders that are subject to special tax rules. Some
examples of shareholders and warrant holders that are subject to
special tax rules are: dealers in securities; financial
institutions; insurance companies; tax-exempt organizations;
holders of shares of Hirsch common stock or warrants to purchase
shares of Hirsch common stock as part of a position in a
straddle or as part of a hedging or
conversion transaction; holders who have a
functional currency other than the U.S. dollar;
holders who are foreign persons; holders who own their shares or
warrants indirectly through partnerships, trusts or other
entities that may be subject to special treatment; and
shareholders or warrant holders who acquired their shares of
Hirsch common stock or warrants as compensation.
In addition, this discussion does not address any consequences
arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign
jurisdiction. HIRSCH SHAREHOLDERS AND WARRANT HOLDERS ARE URGED
TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO SPECIFIC TAX
CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY
AND EFFECT OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR FOREIGN TAX LAWS AND OF
CHANGES IN APPLICABLE TAX LAWS.
Treatment
of the Merger as a Reorganization
The parties have structured the Merger with the intent that it
qualify as a reorganization under Section 368 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The qualification of
the Merger as a reorganization depends on compliance with the
technical requirements of Section 368 including in
particular whether Hirsch shareholders will receive a sufficient
amount of SCM common stock to satisfy the continuity of
interest test set forth in the Treasury regulations
promulgated under Section 368. The continuity of
interest test requires that, after the Merger, a
substantial part of the value of the proprietary interests in
Hirsch be maintained through the ownership of SCM common stock.
Current Treasury regulations provide several examples in which a
continuing proprietary interest is maintained where the target
shareholders receive stock in the acquiring corporation worth
40% of the total consideration received. The Treasury
regulations also provide that in determining whether a
proprietary interest in an acquired corporation is preserved in
an acquisition, the consideration issued to the shareholders of
the acquired corporation shall be valued on the last business
day before the signing of a binding contract providing for fixed
consideration for the acquisition. SCM and Hirsch believe that
under the Treasury regulations the value of the stock portion of
the merger consideration as of the valuation date should
represent 46.4% of the total estimated value of the merger
consideration based on the trading price of SCM stock, amount of
cash consideration and a value for the warrants based on a
Black-Scholes analysis for valuing options. Such calculation
does not take into account the
lock-ups and
other transfer restrictions described in the sections entitled
The Merger Agreement
Lock-Up,
Certain Agreements Related to the Merger
Warrants, and Certain Agreements Related to the
Merger Stockholder Agreement in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. Even
assuming a substantial discount in the value of the stock
portion of the merger consideration as a result of such
lock-ups and
other transfer restrictions, SCM and Hirsch still believe that
the estimated value of such stock will exceed 40% of the total
estimated value of the merger consideration as of the valuation
date.
SCM and Hirsch, however, cannot assure you that the Internal
Revenue Service will accept SCMs and Hirschs
position on the value of the shares of SCM common stock, the
warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock or the
discounts, adjustments and other factors that have been used to
arrive at such estimated values. If the Internal Revenue Service
were to challenge the analysis and successfully contend that the
Merger failed to
89
qualify as a reorganization, the Merger would be a fully taxable
transaction to Hirsch shareholders and warrant holders.
Tax
Opinion at Closing
The Merger Agreement provides that a condition to the closing of
the Merger is the receipt by the parties of an opinion of
counsel to the effect that the Merger will be treated as a
single integrated transaction that qualifies as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended with the tax consequences to
the Hirsch shareholders described below. Such opinion of counsel
will rely on customary representations and assumptions as to
various factual matters, including the following: (i) that
the value of the SCM common stock will constitute at least 40%
of the value of all the consideration issued to Hirsch
shareholders in the Merger, (ii) the Merger will take place
in accordance with all of the terms and conditions of the Merger
as described in this joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus without the waiver or modification of any of
those terms or conditions, (iii) none of SCM, Hirsch, or
any related party acquires or redeems, in connection with the
Merger, shares of SCM common stock issued to Hirsch shareholders
pursuant to the Merger (other than pursuant to an open market
stock repurchase program), (iv) after the Merger,
SCMs wholly-owned LLC will continue Hirschs historic
business or will use a significant portion of Hirschs
historic business assets in a business, and (v) there will
be no material changes in Hirschs business operations
prior to the closing of the Merger.
SCM does not intend to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service with respect to the federal income tax consequences of
the Merger. The opinion of counsel will not bind the courts or
the Internal Revenue Service, nor will it preclude the Internal
Revenue Service from adopting a position contrary to those
expressed in the opinion. No assurance can be given that
contrary positions will not successfully be asserted by the
Internal Revenue Service or adopted by a court if the issues are
litigated. In addition, the opinion of counsel is being
delivered prior to the consummation of the proposed transaction
and therefore is prospective and dependent on future events. No
assurance can be given that future legislative, judicial or
administrative changes, on either a prospective or retroactive
basis, or future factual developments, would not adversely
affect the accuracy of the conclusion stated herein.
The following are the material federal income tax consequences
to Hirsch shareholders who receive their shares of SCM common
stock, cash, and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common
stock, and to Hirsch warrant holders who receive warrants to
purchase shares of SCM common stock, pursuant to a transaction
constituting a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.
Consequences
to Hirsch Shareholders under Reorganization Treatment
If the Merger constitutes a reorganization, Hirsch shareholders
who exchange Hirsch common shares for SCM common stock, cash,
and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock pursuant to
the Merger may recognize gain, but not loss, in the exchange.
The gain, if any, recognized will equal the lesser of
(a) the amount of cash received in the transaction and
(b) the amount of gain realized in the transaction. The
amount of gain that is realized in the exchange will equal the
excess of (i) the sum of the cash plus the fair market
value of the SCM common stock and warrants to purchase shares of
SCM common stock received in the exchange over (ii) the tax
basis of the Hirsch shares surrendered in the transaction. For
this purpose, a Hirsch shareholder must calculate the gain or
loss separately for each identifiable block of Hirsch Shares
that such shareholder surrenders pursuant to the transaction,
and a Hirsch shareholder cannot offset a loss realized on one
block of such shares against a gain recognized on another block
of such shares. Any gain recognized generally will be treated as
capital gain, except that the shareholders gain could be
treated as a dividend if the receipt of the cash has the effect
of the distribution of a dividend for United States federal
income tax purposes (under Sections 302 and 356 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended).
The aggregate tax basis in the SCM common stock and warrants to
purchase shares of SCM common stock received pursuant to the
Merger will be equal to the aggregate tax basis in the shares of
Hirsch common stock surrendered in the transactions, such basis
to be allocated to the SCM common stock and warrants received
based on their relative fair market values, decreased by the
amount of cash received and increased by the amount of gain, if
any, recognized or any amount treated as a dividend. The holding
period of the SCM common stock and warrants to
90
purchase shares of SCM common stock received in the Merger by a
holder of shares of Hirsch common stock will include the holding
period of the shares of Hirsch common stock that he or she
surrendered in exchange therefor. If a Hirsch shareholder has
differing tax bases
and/or
holding periods in respect of the shareholders Hirsch
common stock, the Hirsch shareholder should consult with a tax
advisor in order to identify the tax bases
and/or
holding periods of the particular shares of SCM common stock and
warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock that the Hirsch
shareholder receives pursuant to the merger.
Consequences
to Hirsch Warrant Holders under Reorganization
Treatment
If the Merger constitutes a reorganization, Hirsch warrant
holders who exchange their warrants to purchase shares of Hirsch
common stock for warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
pursuant to the Merger will be treated under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.354-1(e)
as receiving securities with no principal amount and as such
will not recognize any gain or loss in the exchange. The
aggregate tax basis in the warrants to purchase shares of SCM
common stock received pursuant to the Merger will be equal to
the aggregate tax basis in the warrants to purchase shares of
Hirsch common stock surrendered in exchange therefor. The
holding period of the warrants to purchase shares of SCM common
stock received in the Merger will include the holding period of
the warrants to purchase shares of Hirsch common stock
surrendered in exchange therefor. If a Hirsch warrant holder has
differing tax bases
and/or
holding periods in respect of its Hirsch warrants, the Hirsch
warrant holder should consult with a tax advisor in order to
identify the tax bases
and/or
holding periods of the particular warrants to purchase shares of
SCM common stock that the Hirsch warrant holder receives
pursuant to the Merger.
Consequences
to SCM and Hirsch
Neither SCM nor Hirsch will recognize a gain or loss as a result
of the Merger, except for any gain that might arise if SCM pays
cash or property to Hirsch in connection with these transactions
and such cash or property is not distributed to Hirsch
shareholders. SCM does not expect any such gain to be material.
Consequences
to SCM Shareholders
SCM shareholders will not recognize gain or loss as a result of
the Merger, whether or not the Merger qualifies as a
reorganization under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended.
Consequences
to Hirsch Shareholders and Warrant Holders if Merger is Treated
as a Fully Taxable Transaction
If for any reason the Merger failed to qualify as a
reorganization, the Merger would be a fully taxable transaction
to Hirsch shareholders and warrant holders. In such case, Hirsch
shareholders and warrant holders would recognize gain or loss
measured by the difference between the value of all
consideration received by them in the Merger and their tax basis
in the shares of Hirsch common stock and the warrants to
purchase shares of Hirsch common stock, as the case may be,
surrendered in the Merger. The aggregate tax basis in the SCM
common stock and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
received pursuant to the Merger will be equal to the fair market
value of such stock and warrants at the time of the Merger. The
holding period of such SCM common stock and warrants to purchase
shares of SCM common stock will begin on the date immediately
following the date of the Merger.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
Certain U.S. holders may be subject to information
reporting with respect to the cash received in exchange for
shares of Hirsch common stock. U.S. holders who are subject
to information reporting and who do not provide appropriate
information when requested may also be subject to backup
withholding. Any amount withheld under such rules is not an
additional tax and may be refunded or credited against such
U.S. holders federal income tax liability, provided
that the required information is properly furnished in a timely
manner to the Internal Revenue Service.
91
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
This section is a summary of the material provisions of the
Merger Agreement. Because it is a summary, it does not include
all the information that may be important to you. We encourage
you to read carefully the entire copy of the Merger Agreement,
which, with the exception of schedules and exhibits, is attached
as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus, before you decide how to vote.
General
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, through a two-step merger
Hirsch will become a new Delaware limited liability company and
a wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM. The Merger Agreement provides
that Deer Acquisition, Inc., a California corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM (Merger Sub 1), will
merge with and into Hirsch, with Hirsch as the surviving
corporation. As soon as reasonably practicable thereafter,
Hirsch will merge with and into Hart Acquisition LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM
(Merger Sub 2), with Merger Sub 2 as the surviving
entity. As a result of the mergers, the business and assets of
Hirsch will be held by a new Delaware limited liability company
and a wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM (the Surviving
Subsidiary). In exchange for their shares of Hirsch common
stock and warrants to purchase shares of Hirsch common stock,
the securityholders of Hirsch will receive cash, shares of SCM
common stock
and/or
warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock.
Merger
Consideration
At the effective time of the Merger, each share of issued and
outstanding Hirsch common stock existing immediately prior to
the effective time of the Merger shall, without any action on
the part of the shareholder thereof, automatically be retired
and cease to exist and be converted into the right to receive
$3.00 cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding
taxes, two shares of SCM common stock, and a warrant to purchase
one share of SCM common stock at an exercise of $3.00 with a
five-year term that is exercisable for two years following the
third anniversary of the effective time of the Merger (the
merger consideration). Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Hirsch shares described below will not be
converted into the merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Hirsch shares owned by SCM or the Merger Subs these
Hirsch shares will be cancelled without consideration;
|
|
|
|
Hirsch shares held by Hirsch these Hirsch shares
will be cancelled without consideration; and
|
|
|
|
Hirsch shares which are held by shareholders properly demanding
and perfecting dissenters rights pursuant to Sections
1300-1313 of
the California Corporations Code (the dissenting
shares) these Hirsch shares will entitled to
receive the consideration provided for pursuant to
Sections 1300-1313
of the California Corporations Code.
|
The maximum aggregate amount of merger consideration that SCM is
required to pay in connection with the Merger, excluding any
amount that SCM is required to pay with respect to dissenting
shares, is equal to the maximum number of Hirsch
shares permitted under the Merger Agreement, multiplied by each
component of the merger consideration described above. This
maximum number of shares is calculated to be equal
to the sum of 4,705,735 shares, plus shares issued in
connection with the exercise of options and warrants to purchase
shares of Hirsch common stock between the date of the Merger
Agreement and the closing of the Merger, minus the number of
dissenting shares, minus shares of Hirsch common stock held by
SCM or Merger Subs and shares held by Hirsch as treasury stock.
In the event that the actual number of shares of Hirsch common
stock at the effective time of the Merger exceeds the
maximum number of Hirsch shares, then the aggregate
merger consideration will be allocated pro rata among the actual
number of shares of Hirsch common stock outstanding at the
effective time in lieu of the per share allocation described in
the paragraph above.
Procedures
for Exchange of Hirsch Stock Certificates and Warrant
Certificates
Prior to the effective time of the Merger, SCM will deposit with
a paying agent reasonably acceptable to Hirsch, cash, stock
certificates and warrants sufficient to pay the merger
consideration for each outstanding share of Hirsch common stock
and warrants to exchange for the outstanding warrants to
purchase Hirsch common stock. As
92
soon as reasonably practicable after the completion of the
Merger, the paying agent will mail a letter of transmittal and
instructions to each holder of record as of immediately prior to
the effective time of the Merger of Hirsch common stock and
warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock. The letter of
transmittal and instructions will inform holders of Hirsch
common stock and warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock how to
surrender their Hirsch common stock certificates and Hirsch
warrant certificates in exchange for receiving merger
consideration or warrants to purchase shares of SCM common
stock, as the case may be. Until surrendered, no portion of the
merger consideration or warrants to purchase shares of SCM
common stock will be paid to any holder of any Hirsch stock or
warrant certificate.
If any Hirsch stock certificate or Hirsch warrant certificate
has been lost, stolen or destroyed, SCM may, in its discretion,
and as a condition to the delivery of merger consideration or
warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock, require the
owner of such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate to deliver
an affidavit claiming such certificate has been lost, stolen or
destroyed, provide an indemnification agreement and, if
determined by SCM in good faith to be necessary, to post a bond
indemnifying SCM against any claim suffered by SCM or the Merger
Subs with respect to the certificates alleged to have been lost,
stolen or destroyed.
After the effective time of the Merger, Hirschs transfer
books will be closed and there will be no further transfers of
any shares of Hirschs common stock or warrants to purchase
shares of Hirsch common stock that were outstanding immediately
prior to the effective time, and each holder of a certificate
representing any shares of Hirsch common stock (other than
shares listed in the three bullet points above) or warrants to
purchase shares of Hirsch common stock will no longer have any
rights with respect to such shares, except for the right to
receive, for each share represented by the certificate, the
applicable merger consideration or warrants to purchase shares
of SCM common stock, as described above.
Dissenters
Rights
Any shares of Hirsch common stock that are issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the
Merger and that have not been voted for approval of the Merger
Agreement and the Merger at the Hirsch special meeting or
otherwise consented thereto in writing (or with respect to which
the holder has not otherwise effectively waived its rights under
Chapter 13 of the California Corporations Code) and with
respect to which a demand for payment and appraisal has been
properly made in accordance with Chapter 13 of the
California Corporations Code, will not be converted into the
right to receive the merger consideration otherwise payable with
respect to such shares of Hirsch common stock, except as set
forth below. If a holder of dissenting shares withdraws his or
her demand for such payment and appraisal, with the consent of
Hirsch, or such dissenting shares (or such other shares of
Hirsch common stock with respect to which dissenters
rights have not terminated) become ineligible for such payment
and appraisal, then, as of the effective time of the Merger or
the occurrence of such event of withdrawal or ineligibility,
whichever last occurs, such holders Hirsch shares (or such
other shares of Hirsch common stock) will cease to be
dissenting shares (or, in the case of such other
shares of Hirsch common stock, the dissenters rights shall
have terminated) and such shares will be converted into the
right to receive, and will be exchangeable for, the merger
consideration into which such shares would have been converted,
without any interest thereon. See the section entitled The
Merger Appraisal Rights and Dissenters
Rights for additional information.
Treatment
of Hirsch Options and Warrants
Hirsch
Options
At the effective time, each option to purchase shares of Hirsch
common stock outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to
the effective time of the Merger will be terminated and
cancelled, and neither SCM, the Merger Subs, nor the surviving
entity will assume or be bound by any obligation with respect to
such options.
Hirsch
Warrants
At the effective time, each warrant to purchase shares of Hirsch
common stock outstanding and not terminated or exercised
immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will be
converted into a warrant to purchase the number of shares of SCM
common stock equal to the number of shares of Hirsch common
stock that could have been purchased upon the full exercise of
such warrant, multiplied by the conversion ratio, rounded down
to the
93
nearest whole share. The per share exercise price for each new
warrant to purchase SCM common stock will be determined by
dividing the per share exercise price of the Hirsch common stock
subject to each warrant as in effect immediately prior to the
effective time of the Merger by the conversion ratio, and
rounding that result up to the nearest cent. As used in this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus, the
term conversion ratio means the quotient obtained by
dividing the aggregate value of the merger consideration per
share, divided by the
30-day
volume weighted average price of SCMs common stock (as
reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market during the 30 days
preceding the day prior to the day of the effective time of the
Merger). For more information with respect to the conversion
ratio, see the section entitled The Merger
Merger Consideration Conversion Ratio.
Adjustments
to Prevent Dilution
The merger consideration and conversion ratio will be
appropriately and proportionately adjusted to reflect any stock
dividend, subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization,
split, combination, or exchange of shares with respect to SCM
common stock between the date of the Merger Agreement and the
effective time of the Merger.
Governing
Documents; Directors and Officers
From and after the effective time of the Merger, the certificate
of formation of Merger Sub 2, as in effect immediately prior to
effective time of the Merger, will be the certificate of
formation of the Surviving Subsidiary until amended in
accordance with the provisions thereof and applicable law. From
and after the effective time of the Merger, the operating
agreement of Merger Sub 2 as in effect immediately prior to the
Merger will be the operating agreement of the Surviving
Subsidiary until amended in accordance with the provisions
thereof and applicable law. SCM, the sole member of the
surviving entity, shall continue as the sole member of the
Surviving Subsidiary. Following the effective time and in
accordance with the terms of their employment agreements,
Lawrence W. Midland, Robert Beliles, John Piccininni, and
Robert Zivney will serve as the executive officers of the
Surviving Subsidiary. See the section entitled, Employment
Agreements with Hirsch Executive Officers for additional
information.
Lock-Up
During the period beginning on the closing date of the Merger
and continuing until the nine (9) month anniversary of the
closing date, Hirsch shareholders will be prohibited from,
directly or indirectly, transferring the shares of SCM common
stock or warrant to purchase shares of SCM common stock issued
in connection with the Merger, including a prohibition against
(a) offering, pledging, selling or contracting to sell such
securities; (b) offering, pledging, selling or contracting
to sell any option or contracting to purchase any such
Securities; (c) contracting to purchase or purchasing any
option or contracting to sell any such securities;
(d) granting any option, right or warrant for the sale of
any such securities; (e) lending or otherwise disposing of
or transferring (or entering into any transaction or device
designed to, or that could be expected to, result in the
disposition by any person at any time in the future of) any such
securities or securities convertible into or exercisable or
exchangeable for such securities; or (f) entering into a
swap or other derivatives transaction or agreement that
transfers, in whole or in part (directly or indirectly), the
economic consequences of ownership of any such securities,
whether any such swap or transaction described in
clauses (a) through (f) is to be settled by delivery
of such securities or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or
(g) announcing his, her or its intention to do any of the
foregoing. However, during the period commencing on the day
after the six (6) month anniversary of closing date and
ending on date of the nine (9) month anniversary of closing
date, a Hirsch shareholder may enter into a transaction
described in clauses (a) through (g) with respect to up to
50% of the shares of SCM common stock or warrant to purchase
shares of SCM common stock issued in connection with the Merger
to such Hirsch shareholder.
Legends
The Merger Agreement provides that each certificate representing
SCM common stock issued as part of the merger consideration, and
any other securities issued upon any stock split, stock
dividend, recapitalization, merger,
94
consolidation or similar event, shall be stamped or otherwise
imprinted with legends in the following form (in addition to any
other legends required under applicable securities laws):
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE TRANSFERRED
ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CERTAIN TERMS AND RESTRICTIONS OF AN
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER GOVERNING THE SHARES ACQUIRED BY
THE STOCKHOLDER FROM THE COMPANY, A COPY OF WHICH IS ON FILE
WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY.
SCM and any duly appointed transfer agent for the registration
or transfer of the shares of SCM common stock is authorized to
decline to make any transfer of the shares of SCM common stock
if such transfer would constitute a violation or breach of the
foregoing.
Expenses
of Hirsch
Within five business days prior to the closing of the Merger,
Hirsch will provide SCM an itemized schedule containing
(i) a true and complete list of all Hirsch transaction
expenses that have been paid (or for which invoices have been
received) or will be due and payable that have been paid as of
the closing date of the Merger, (ii) a good faith estimate
of all such additional Hirsch transaction expenses that have
been incurred or are reasonably expected to be incurred as of
the closing date of the Merger but are not reflected in clause
(i), and (iii) a good faith estimate of any additional
Hirsch transaction expenses that are reasonably expected to be
incurred after the closing date of the Merger. Hirsch agreed to
use its commercially reasonable efforts to not incur Hirsch
transaction expenses in the aggregate in excess of $600,000 and
to provide prompt written notice to SCM in the event that the
aggregate Hirsch transaction expenses are reasonably expected to
exceed $600,000 (provided that nothing therein limits
Hirschs right to incur transaction expenses that it deems
reasonably necessary).
Taxes and
Withholding
Merger consideration is only payable to record holders of Hirsch
common stock outstanding as of the effective time of the Merger.
Hirsch has authorized SCM and the paying agent to deduct and
withhold from the merger consideration otherwise payable
pursuant to the Merger Agreement to any holder or former holder
of shares of Hirsch common stock or warrants to purchase shares
of Hirsch common stock, or from the amount paid to any
dissenting shareholder, such amounts as Hirsch, SCM or the
paying agent is required to deduct and withhold with respect to
the making of such payment or under any provision of applicable
law. To the extent that amounts are so deducted or withheld,
such amounts shall be treated for all purposes of the Merger
Agreement as having been paid to the holder of the shares of
Hirsch common stock in respect of which such deduction and
withholding was made. Any such withholding will be satisfied
first from the amount of the cash portion of the merger
consideration and, to the extent the amount of required
withholding exceeds the cash portion of the merger
consideration, from the stock portion of the merger
consideration.
Representations
and Warranties
The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties of
SCM and Hirsch relating to their respective businesses and
operations. Certain representations and warranties were made as
of a specific date, and certain representations and warranties
may be subject to contractual standards of materiality different
from those generally applicable to stockholders and
shareholders, or may have been used for the purpose of
allocating risk between the parties rather than establishing
matters of fact. The representations and warranties
(a) have been qualified by separate disclosures made to the
other parties in connection with the Merger Agreement,
(b) will not survive the closing of the Merger and
(c) at closing, must only be true and correct subject to
the standards contained in the Merger Agreement, which may
differ from what may be viewed as material by Hirschs
shareholders or SCMs stockholders.
95
Representations
and Warranties of Hirsch
Hirsch has made representations and warranties about itself and
its subsidiaries to SCM regarding, among other matters:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate matters, including organization and qualification;
|
|
|
|
authority to execute and deliver the Merger Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with, or violations of, organizational
documents or other obligations as a result of the Merger;
|
|
|
|
capitalization;
|
|
|
|
equity interests;
|
|
|
|
financial statements;
|
|
|
|
absence of material adverse effect since November 30, 2007;
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws and permits;
|
|
|
|
any pending or threatened litigation;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
material contracts;
|
|
|
|
accuracy of information furnished, and disclosure;
|
|
|
|
brokers fees payable in connection with the Merger;
|
|
|
|
absence of undisclosed liabilities since November 30, 2007;
|
|
|
|
accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
export control laws;
|
|
|
|
absence of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;
|
|
|
|
employee benefit plans, labor and employment matters;
|
|
|
|
title to, and sufficiency and condition of, assets;
|
|
|
|
real property;
|
|
|
|
environmental matters;
|
|
|
|
affiliate interests and transactions;
|
|
|
|
insurance;
|
|
|
|
inventory;
|
|
|
|
customers and suppliers;
|
|
|
|
warranties;
|
|
|
|
capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
key employees; and
|
|
|
|
expenses.
|
96
Representations
and Warranties of SCM
SCM also made representations and warranties about itself and
its subsidiaries to Hirsch regarding, among other matters:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate matters, including organization and qualification;
|
|
|
|
authority to execute and deliver the Merger Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with, or violations of, organizational
documents or other obligations as a result of the Merger;
|
|
|
|
capitalization;
|
|
|
|
equity interests;
|
|
|
|
financial statements;
|
|
|
|
SCMs previously filed SEC reports;
|
|
|
|
absence of material adverse effect since September 30, 2008;
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws and permits;
|
|
|
|
any pending or threatened litigation;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
material contracts;
|
|
|
|
accuracy of information furnished, and disclosure; and
|
|
|
|
brokers fees payable in connection with the Merger.
|
Qualifications
Many of the representations and warranties of each of Hirsch and
SCM are qualified by materiality, including the
absence of a material adverse effect,
and/or
knowledge. For purposes of the Merger Agreement, a
material adverse effect means any event, change,
circumstance, occurrence, effect that (a) would have a
material adverse effect on the business, operation, assets,
liabilities, condition (financial or otherwise) or results of
operations or prospects of either Hirsch or SCM, as the case may
be, and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole or (b) would
prevent, materially delay or materially impede the performance
by either Hirsch or SCM, as the case may be, of its obligations
under the Merger Agreement or the consummation by such party of
the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, other
than any event, change, occurrence or effect resulting from any
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic, financial market, business or
geopolitical conditions;
|
|
|
|
general changes or developments in any of the industries in
which Hirsch or its subsidiaries operate;
|
|
|
|
changes in any applicable laws or applicable accounting
regulations or principles or interpretations thereof;
|
|
|
|
any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or war or any act of
terrorism;
|
|
|
|
the announcement or pendency of the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby; or
|
|
|
|
in the case of SCM only, changes in the trading volume or market
price of SCM common stock in and of itself.
|
Survivability
of Representations and Warranties; Indemnification
The representations and warranties of Hirsch, SCM, and the
Merger Subs do not survive the effective time of the Merger and
there is no obligation of either party to indemnify the other
for breaches of the representations and
97
warranties. Accordingly, Hirsch has no obligation to indemnify
SCM from any damages incurred by SCM as a result of any breach
or failure of Hirsch to be true and correct in its
representations and warranties.
However, a condition to each of Hirschs and SCMs
respective obligations to close the Merger is that the
representations of the other party be true and correct
(disregarding all qualifications and exceptions regarding
materiality or material adverse effect), both when made and as
of the closing date of the Merger (or, in the case of
representations and warranties made as of a specified date, as
of such specified date); however, these conditions are deemed
satisfied unless such breaches, individually or in the
aggregate, give rise to or could reasonably give rise to a loss,
cost, damage, liability or expense in excess of $2,500,000. See
the section entitled, The Merger Agreement
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger for additional
information about these closing conditions.
The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties
made by SCM and Hirsch which are used as a tool to allocate
risks between the parties where the parties do not have complete
knowledge of all facts. Accordingly no persons should rely on
the representations and warranties as characterizations of the
actual state of facts or condition of SCM or Hirsch.
Covenants
of Hirsch
Hirsch has various obligations and responsibilities under the
Merger Agreement from the date thereof until the effective time
of the Merger, including, but not limited to, the following:
Hirsch
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
Hirsch agreed to conduct its business in the ordinary course of
business, consistent with past practice, and to preserve
substantially intact the business organization and assets of it
and its subsidiaries. Without the consent of SCM, the Merger
Agreement restricts Hirsch from taking any of the following
actions, subject to certain limited exceptions as set forth in
the Merger Agreement, during the period between the date of the
Merger Agreement and the effective time of the Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
amend or otherwise change its articles of incorporation or
bylaws or equivalent organizational documents;
|
|
|
|
issue any securities, or dispose of any properties or assets;
|
|
|
|
pay any dividend or other distribution;
|
|
|
|
reclassify, combine, split, subdivide or redeem, or purchase or
otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of its capital
stock or make any other change with respect to its capital
structure;
|
|
|
|
acquire any other person or any material amount of assets, or
enter into any joint venture, strategic alliance, exclusive
dealing, non-competition or similar contract or arrangement;
|
|
|
|
adopt a plan of complete or partial reorganization, or otherwise
alter its or a subsidiarys corporate structure (other than
the Merger);
|
|
|
|
incur any indebtedness except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
enter into, waive, modify, or terminate any material contract;
|
|
|
|
authorize any capital expenditure (except for such capital
expenditures that do not, individually or in the aggregate,
exceed $25,000);
|
|
|
|
enter into any lease of real or personal property or any
renewals thereof involving a term of more than one year or
rental obligation exceeding $25,000 per year in any single case;
|
|
|
|
increase the compensation payable or to become payable or the
benefits provided to its directors, officers or employees
(except for normal merit and cost-of-living increases for
non-executive employees and payments of annual bonuses for the
fiscal year ended November 30, 2008), or grant any
severance or termination payment to, or loan or advance any
amount to, any director, officer or employee;
|
|
|
|
enter into any contract with any related party of Hirsch or its
subsidiaries, other than as contemplated by the Merger Agreement;
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
make any change in any method of accounting or accounting
practice or policy, except as required by GAAP;
|
|
|
|
make, revoke or modify any tax election, settle or compromise
any tax liability or file any return other than on a basis
consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
discharge any liabilities;
|
|
|
|
cancel, compromise, waive or release any right or claim other
than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice;
|
|
|
|
permit the lapse of any existing policy of insurance, except by
reason of replacement;
|
|
|
|
permit the lapse of any intellectual property right or any other
intangible asset used in and necessary to the business of Hirsch
or any of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
accelerate the collection of or discount any accounts
receivable, delay the payment of accounts payable or defer
expenses, reduce inventories or otherwise increase cash on hand;
|
|
|
|
commence or settle any action;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would be reasonably likely to cause a
representation or warranty to be materially untrue, breach any
covenant, or result in a material adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
take any action outside of the ordinary course of business that
would reasonably be expected to decrease the cash and cash
equivalents on Hirschs balance sheet as of the closing
date to less than $4,500,000; or
|
|
|
|
announce an intention, enter into any formal or informal
agreement, or otherwise make a commitment to do any of the
foregoing.
|
Stock
Option Plans
Hirsch has agreed that prior to the effective time of the Merger
it will take all necessary actions to ensure that all Hirsch
option plans and options granted thereunder will terminate as of
the effective time of the Merger, and that after the effective
time Hirsch will not be bound by any Hirsch option plan or
Hirsch option that would entitle any person, other than SCM or
its affiliates, to beneficially own, or receive any payments or
any capital stock other than the merger consideration or
warrants to purchase SCM common stock as discussed above.
Proprietary
Information and Assignment Agreements
Hirsch has agreed to use its reasonable efforts to enter into
written agreements with each current and former director,
officer, management employee, or technical and professional
employee, which provide that such director, officer, or employee
will maintain in confidence all confidential or proprietary
information acquired by them in the course of their employment
with Hirsch, and to assign Hirsch all inventions made by them
within the scope of their employment during such employment and
for a reasonable period thereafter.
Covenants
of SCM and Merger Subs
SCM has various obligations and responsibilities under the
Merger Agreement from the date thereof until the effective time
of the Merger, including, but not limited to, the following:
SCM
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
SCM agreed to conduct its business in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, and to preserve
substantially intact the business organization and assets of it
and its subsidiaries. Without the consent of Hirsch, the Merger
Agreement restricts SCM from taking any of the following
actions, subject to certain limited exceptions, as set forth in
the Merger Agreement, during the period between the date of the
Merger Agreement and the effective time of the Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
amend or otherwise change its articles of incorporation or
bylaws or equivalent organizational documents;
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
issue securities that represent more than 5% of the outstanding
shares of SCM common stock as of the signing of the Merger
Agreement, or dispose of all or substantially all of the
properties or assets of SCM or any of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
pay any dividend or other distribution;
|
|
|
|
reclassify, combine, split, subdivide or redeem, or purchase or
otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of its capital
stock or make any other change with respect to its capital
structure;
|
|
|
|
acquire any other person, or enter into any joint venture,
strategic alliance, exclusive dealing, non-competition or
similar contract or arrangement, in each such case with a
transaction cost to SCM in excess of $5,000,000;
|
|
|
|
adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution,
merger, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other
reorganization, or otherwise alter in any material respect
SCMs or a subsidiarys corporate structure (other
than the Merger);
|
|
|
|
incur indebtedness in excess of $1,000,000;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would be reasonably likely to cause a
representation or warranty to be materially untrue, breach any
covenant, or result in a material adverse effect; or
|
|
|
|
announce an intention, enter into any formal or informal
agreement or otherwise make a commitment to do any of the
foregoing.
|
Director
and Officer Indemnification and Insurance
For a period of three years following the effective time of the
Merger, and to the extent of insurance coverage, for three
additional years, the surviving entity of the Merger will, to
the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify and hold harmless
the Hirsch directors and officers serving as of the date of the
Merger Agreement against all claims, losses, liabilities,
damages, judgments, costs and expenses, including reasonable
attorneys fees, actually and reasonably incurred and
arising from any claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation pertaining to the fact that such person is or was
a director or officer of Hirsch, subject to certain exceptions.
For a period of six years following the effective time of the
Merger, the surviving entity of the Merger will maintain, in
effect, a directors and officers liability insurance
policy covering the directors and officers of Hirsch, with
coverage in amount and scope at least as favorable as the
coverage under the existing Hirsch policy at the time the Merger
becomes effective; provided, that the aggregate premiums
for such policy do not exceed $50,000.
Stock
Option Plans; Director Warrants
Following the effective time of the Merger, SCM has agreed that
in the ordinary course of its employee compensation process, and
with input and approval from the current Chief Executive Officer
and President of Hirsch, Lawrence W. Midland, SCM will make
appropriate grants of employee stock options under SCMs
option plans to Hirsch employees consistent with stock grants
made to similarly situated employees of SCM. In addition, SCM
has agreed that in exchange for their service to Hirsch during
2008, SCM will grant Eugene Mak, Maury Polner and Doug Morgan
(each, a current director of Hirsch), and to Ayman Ashour, a
former director of Hirsch, a warrant to purchase the number of
shares of SCM common stock that is equivalent to what
3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock would convert to at the
effective time based on the conversion ratio, at an exercise
price of $3.00 per share of SCM common stock.
Certain
Covenants of both SCM and Hirsch
Commercially
Reasonable Efforts
Each of Hirsch, SCM, and Merger Subs has agreed to use all
commercially reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken,
all appropriate action to do, or cause to be done, all things
necessary, proper or advisable under
100
applicable law or otherwise to consummate and make effective the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and the
ancillary agreements as promptly as practicable, including to:
|
|
|
|
|
obtain from governmental authorities and other persons all
consents and permits as are necessary for the consummation by
such party of the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement and the ancillary agreements or for which such party
(or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates) is otherwise
responsible;
|
|
|
|
promptly make all necessary filings, and thereafter make any
other required submissions, with respect to the Merger Agreement
and the ancillary agreements required to be made by such party
(or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates) under any applicable
law; and
|
|
|
|
have vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any order, decree,
ruling, judgment, injunction or other action (whether temporary,
preliminary or permanent) to which such party (or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliates) is subject that is in effect and
that enjoins, restrains, conditions, makes illegal or otherwise
restricts or prohibits the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement or any of the ancillary
agreements.
|
In addition, Hirsch has agreed to permit SCM reasonably to
participate in the defense and settlement of any action or cause
of action relating to the Merger Agreement, the Merger or the
other transactions contemplated thereby or by any of the
ancillary agreements, and Hirsch has agreed not to settle or
compromise any such action or cause of action without SCMs
written consent.
Notwithstanding the above, neither Hirsch, SCM nor Merger Subs
are required to take or agree to undertake any action, including
entering into any consent decree, hold separate order or other
arrangement, that would require the divestiture of any of it
assets (or in the case of SCM, any of the assets of Hirsch) or
any of the assets of its respective subsidiaries or affiliates
or limit such partys freedom of action with respect to, or
its ability to consolidate and control, any of its assets or
businesses (or in the case of SCM, any of the assets or
businesses of Hirsch), or the assets or businesses of its
respective subsidiaries or affiliates.
Joint
Proxy Statement;
Form S-4
Hirsch and SCM agreed to prepare and file this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus, and SCM agreed
to prepare and file a registration statement on
Form S-4
of which this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus is a part, as soon as practicable following the date
of the Merger Agreement with respect to the shares of SCM common
stock and warrants to purchase SCM common stock to be issued in
connection with the Merger or in connection with the exercise of
any warrant to purchase shares of SCM common stock, and to use
commercially reasonable efforts to have the
Form S-4
declared effective as promptly as practicable after filing.
Hirsch also agreed to promptly furnish information about Hirsch
and its shareholders as may be reasonably requested by SCM, and
to use its diligent efforts to cause its independent auditors to
promptly provide all consents for inclusion of Hirschs
audited financial statements and the report thereon in the
reports, registration statements or filings of SCM filed or to
be filed with the SEC. The parties subsequently clarified that
with respect to the shares of SCM common stock issuable upon the
exercise of the warrants to purchase SCM common stock in
connection with the Merger, SCM would comply with all applicable
securities regulations and registration requirements for any
such issuance prior to the time the warrants become exercisable
according to their terms, but such shares will not be registered
on the registration statement on
Form S-4
of which this joint proxy statement/information statement is a
part.
Prior to the filing of, or amendment or supplement to, the joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus or
Form S-4,
the parties have agreed that the party responsible for filing or
amending such document will provide the other party and its
respective counsel a reasonable opportunity to review and
comment on such document or response and to give due
consideration to the comments proposed by the other party. The
parties also agreed to notify the other party of the receipt of
any comments from the SEC or any request for additional
information, and to supply copies of all correspondence between
such party or any of its representatives or affiliates on the
one hand, and the SEC or its staff, on the other, with respect
to the joint proxy statement, the
Form S-4,
or the Merger.
SCM has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to make
all required filings with state regulatory authorities and the
NASDAQ Stock Market and to cause the shares of SCM common stock
and warrants to purchase
101
SCM common stock to be issued in the Merger or in connection
with the exercise of any warrant to purchase shares of SCM
common stock to qualify under the securities or blue
sky law of every jurisdiction of the United States in
which any Hirsch shareholder has an address of record on the
record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of
and to vote on the Merger, and Hirsch agreed to furnish to SCM
all information concerning Hirsch and its subsidiaries, and
Hirsch shareholders, as SCM may request in connection with such
actions.
Exclusivity
Hirsch and SCM agreed that immediately following the execution
and delivery of the Merger Agreement each of the parties and
their subsidiaries would cease any and all existing activities,
discussions, or negotiations with any person relating to any
acquisition proposals. The parties further agreed that until the
earlier of the termination of the Merger Agreement and the
effective time of the Merger neither Hirsch nor SCM may, nor may
any of their respective representatives or affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, encourage, seek, entertain, support, assist, initiate
or participate in any inquiry, negotiations or discussions, or
enter into any agreement, with respect to any acquisition
proposal;
|
|
|
|
disclose or furnish any information in connection with an
acquisition proposal concerning the business, technologies or
properties of either Hirsch or SCM, or any of their respective
subsidiaries, or afford access to its properties, technologies,
books or records, in connection with an acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
approve, endorse or recommend an acquisition proposal relating
to Hirsch or SCM, respectively;
|
|
|
|
enter into any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding or
other contract contemplating or otherwise relating to an
acquisition proposal relating to Hirsch or SCM,
respectively; or
|
|
|
|
terminate, amend or waive any rights under any
standstill or other similar contract between it or
any of its subsidiaries and any person (other than the other
party to the Merger Agreement).
|
SCM
Acquisition Proposals
However, notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to obtaining the
approval of SCM stockholders, SCM may, directly or indirectly
through advisors, agents or other intermediaries:
(a) engage or participate in discussions or negotiations
with any person that has made (and not withdrawn) a bona fide
written SCM acquisition proposal (as described
below) that the SCM board of directors reasonably determines in
good faith would not require SCM to forego the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, or
constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to an SCM
superior proposal (as described below);
and/or
(b) furnish to any person that has made (and not withdrawn)
a bona fide written SCM acquisition proposal that the SCM board
of directors reasonably determines in good faith would not
require SCM to forego the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement or (after consultation with
its financial advisor and outside legal counsel) constitutes or
is reasonably likely to lead to a SCM superior proposal,
non-public information relating to SCM or any of its
subsidiaries pursuant to a confidentiality agreement the terms
of which are no less favorable to SCM than those contained in
the confidentiality agreement between SCM and Hirsch, if:
|
|
|
|
|
the SCM board of directors reasonably determines in good faith
(after consultation with outside legal counsel) that the failure
to take such action would reasonably be expected to be a breach
of its fiduciary duties under the Delaware General Corporation
Law;
|
|
|
|
at least one business day prior to engaging or participating in
any such discussions or negotiations with, or furnishing any
non-public information to, such person, SCM gives Hirsch written
notice of the identity of such person and the material terms and
conditions of such SCM acquisition proposal and of SCMs
intention to engage or participate in discussions or
negotiations with, or furnish non-public information to, such
person; and
|
|
|
|
contemporaneously with furnishing any non-public information to
such person, SCM furnishes such non-public information to Hirsch
(to the extent such information has not been previously
furnished to Hirsch).
|
102
A SCM acquisition proposal means any inquiry,
proposal or offer from any person or group of persons (other
than an inquiry, proposal or offer from the other party hereto)
relating to, or that is reasonably likely to lead to, any direct
or indirect acquisition or purchase, in one transaction or a
series of transactions, including any Merger, reorganization,
consolidation, tender offer, self-tender, exchange offer, stock
acquisition, asset acquisition, binding share exchange, business
combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, joint
venture or similar transaction, (a) of assets or businesses
of SCM or its subsidiaries, that generate 50% or more of the net
revenues or net income or that represent 50% or more of the
total assets (based on fair market value), of SCM and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately prior to such
transaction, (b) of 50% or more of any class of capital
stock, other equity security or voting power of SCM or any
resulting parent company of SCM, (c) involving SCM or any
of its subsidiaries, individually or taken together, whose
businesses constitute 50% or more of the net revenues, net
income or total assets (based on fair market value) of SCM or
its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately prior to such
transaction, in each case other than the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
A SCM superior proposal means any unsolicited, bona
fide, written SCM acquisition proposal made by a person other
than Hirsch or its affiliates (a) for consideration and on
terms which SCMs board of directors determines, in its
good faith judgment after consultation with SCMs outside
legal counsel and independent financial advisors, and taking
into account all of the terms and conditions of such proposal,
would, if consummated, require SCM to forego the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and be
more favorable to SCM stockholders than those provided under the
Merger Agreement (including any adjustment to the terms and
conditions proposed by Hirsch, and including any
break-up
fees and expense reimbursement provisions), and (b) that
SCMs board of directors determines in its good faith
judgment is reasonably likely of being completed on the terms
proposed on a timely basis, taking into account all material
financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects of such proposal
and the person making such proposal. For the purposes of this
definition of SCM superior proposal references in
the definition of SCM acquisition proposal to 50%
are changed to 80%.
Hirsch
Acquisition Proposals
At any time prior to obtaining the approval of Hirsch
shareholders, Hirsch may, directly or indirectly through
advisors, agents or other intermediaries: (a) engage or
participate in discussions or negotiations with any person that
has made (and not withdrawn) a bona fide written Hirsch
acquisition proposal (as described below) that the Hirsch
board of directors reasonably determines in good faith
constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a Hirsch superior
proposal (as described below),
and/or
(b) furnish to any person that has made (and not withdrawn)
a bona fide written Hirsch acquisition proposal that the
Hirsch board of directors reasonably determines in good faith
(after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal
counsel) constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a Hirsch
superior proposal, non-public information relating to Hirsch or
any of its subsidiaries pursuant to a confidentiality agreement
the terms of which are no less favorable to Hirsch than those
contained in the confidentiality agreement between Hirsch and
SCM, if:
|
|
|
|
|
the Hirsch board of directors reasonably determines in good
faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that the
failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be a
breach of its fiduciary duties under the California Corporations
Code;
|
|
|
|
at least one business day prior to engaging or participating in
any such discussions or negotiations with, or furnishing any
non-public information to, such person, Hirsch gives SCM written
notice of the identity of such person and the material terms and
conditions of such acquisition proposal (unless such acquisition
proposal is in written form, in which case Hirsch shall give SCM
a copy of all written materials comprising or relating thereto)
and of Hirschs intention to engage or participate in
discussions or negotiations with, or furnish non-public
information to, such person; and
|
|
|
|
contemporaneously with furnishing any non-public information to
such person, Hirsch furnishes such non-public information to SCM
(to the extent such information has not been previously
furnished to SCM).
|
A Hirsch acquisition proposal means any inquiry,
proposal or offer from any person or group of persons (other
than an inquiry, proposal or offer from the other party hereto)
relating to, or that is reasonably likely to lead to, any direct
or indirect acquisition or purchase, in one transaction or a
series of transactions, including any merger, reorganization,
consolidation, tender offer, self-tender, exchange offer, stock
acquisition, asset acquisition, binding
103
share exchange, business combination, recapitalization,
liquidation, dissolution, joint venture or similar transaction,
(a) of assets or businesses of Hirsch and its subsidiaries,
that generate 15% or more of the net revenues or net income or
that represent 10% or more of the total assets (based on fair
market value), of Hirsch and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
immediately prior to such transaction, (b) of 10% or more
of any class of capital stock, other equity security or voting
power of Hirsch or any resulting parent company of Hirsch,
(c) involving Hirsch or any of its subsidiaries,
individually or taken together, whose businesses constitute 10%
or more of the net revenues, net income or total assets (based
on fair market value) of Hirsch and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, immediately prior to such transaction, in each case other
than the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
A Hirsch superior proposal means any unsolicited,
bona fide written Hirsch acquisition proposal made by a
person other than SCM, Merger Subs, or their affiliates
(a) for consideration and on terms which Hirschs
board of directors determines, in its good faith judgment after
consultation with Hirschs outside legal counsel and
independent financial advisors, and taking into account all of
the terms and conditions of such proposal, would, if
consummated, be more favorable to the Hirsch shareholders than
those provided under the Merger Agreement (including any
adjustment to the terms and conditions proposed by SCM, and
including any
break-up
fees and expense reimbursement provisions), and (b) that
Hirschs board of directors determines in its good faith
judgment is reasonably likely of being completed on the terms
proposed on a timely basis, taking into account all material
financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects of such proposal
and the person making such proposal. For the purposes of this
definition of Hirsch superior proposal references in
the definition of Hirsch acquisition proposal to 10%
or 15% are changed to 80%.
Notice
of Acquisition Proposal
Each of Hirsch and SCM has agreed to advise the other party,
promptly, and in all cases within twenty-four (24) hours of
its receipt, orally and in writing of (a) any acquisition
proposal it receives, (b) any request for information it
receives that would reasonably be expected to lead to an
acquisition proposal or (c) any inquiry it receives with
respect to, or which would reasonably be expected to lead to,
any acquisition proposal, the material terms and conditions of
such acquisition proposal, request or inquiry (including copies
of all written materials comprising or relating thereto), and
the identity of the person or group making any such acquisition
proposal, request or inquiry, and to keep the other party
reasonably informed on a current basis of the status of any
discussions with respect to any acquisition proposal and the
material terms and conditions (including all amendments or
proposed amendments) of any acquisition proposal, request or
inquiry it receives. In addition to the foregoing, each party
agreed to provide the other party thereto with at least three
business days written notice of a meeting of its board of
directors (or any committee thereof) at which its board of
directors (or any committee thereof) is reasonably expected to
consider an acquisition proposal it has received.
SCM
Stockholder and Hirsch Shareholder Meetings; Change in Board
Recommendation
SCM and Hirsch have each agreed to convene a meeting of their
respective stockholders and shareholders for purposes of
obtaining SCM stockholder and Hirsch shareholder approval of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement including, in
the case of SCMs stockholders, the issuance of shares of
SCM common stock and warrants to purchase SCM common stock in
the Merger. Each of the parties have agreed that as soon as
reasonably practicable following the date the registration
statement becomes effective, but in any event within five
business days thereafter, they will provide notice of the SCM
special meeting and Hirsch special meeting to the SCM
stockholders and Hirsch shareholders, respectively. The SCM
special meeting must be convened within 50 days of such
notice, and the Hirsch special meeting within 30 days.
Each of SCMs and Hirschs board of directors have
agreed to unanimously recommend the approval and adoption of the
Merger Agreement and the Merger to their respective stockholders
and shareholders, and to use their commercially reasonable
efforts to solicit and obtain the approval of their respective
stockholders and shareholders, and to include that
recommendation in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus. Furthermore, each of SCMs and
Hirschs board of directors has agreed not to change,
withhold, withdraw, amend, modify, qualify or condition in a
manner adverse to the other party, or publicly propose to
withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to the
other party, such board recommendation. As used in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus, such
change in recommendation is referred to as a board
recommendation change.
104
Recommendation
Change by SCMs Board of Directors
Notwithstanding the aforementioned obligation, the SCM board of
directors may, at any time prior to obtaining stockholder
approval, effect a board recommendation change if: (a) SCM
has received an SCM acquisition proposal relating to it that
constitutes an SCM superior proposal, (b) prior to
effecting such board recommendation change, SCM gives Hirsch at
least five business days notice thereof, which notice shall
include the most current terms of such SCM superior proposal and
the identity of the person making such SCM superior proposal and
the opportunity to meet to discuss in good faith a modification
of the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement so that the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby may be
effected, and (c) after such discussions, the SCM board of
directors reasonably determines in good faith (after
consultation with outside legal counsel) that the failure to
effect such board recommendation change would be reasonably
likely to result in a breach of its fiduciary duties under the
Delaware General Corporation Law.
Recommendation
Change by Hirschs Board of Directors
Notwithstanding the aforementioned obligation, Hirschs
board of directors may, at any time prior to obtaining
shareholder approval, effect a board recommendation change if:
(a) Hirsch has received a Hirsch acquisition proposal
relating to it that constitutes a Hirsch superior proposal,
(b) prior to effecting such board recommendation change,
Hirsch gives SCM at least five business days notice thereof,
which notice shall include the most current terms of such Hirsch
superior proposal and the identity of the person making such
Hirsch superior proposal and the opportunity to meet to discuss
in good faith a modification of the terms and conditions of the
Merger Agreement so that the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated thereby may be effected, (c) SCM shall not
have made, within three business days after receipt of the
written notice of Hirschs intention to effect a board
recommendation change, a counter-offer or proposal that is at
least as favorable to the Hirsch shareholders as such Hirsch
superior proposal and (d) after such discussions,
Hirschs board of directors reasonably determines in good
faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel and after
considering in good faith any counter-offer or proposal made by
SCM pursuant to the immediately preceding clause) that the
failure to effect such board recommendation change would be
reasonably likely to result in a breach of its fiduciary duties
under the California Corporations Code. However, Hirschs
obligation to give notice of and hold its shareholder meeting to
consider and vote upon the Merger Agreement and the Merger will
not be affected by a Hirsch board recommendation change.
Tax-Free
Reorganization
Each of Hirsch, SCM and Merger Subs agreed to use their
commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Merger to qualify
as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and to not take
any actions that could prevent or impede the Merger from
qualifying as a reorganization.
Access
to Information
Each of Hirsch and SCM has agreed to, and to cause each of its
subsidiaries to, complete access at all reasonable times to the
properties, offices, plants and other facilities, books and
records of such party and its affiliates and subsidiaries, and
to furnish to the other party and their respective
representatives such financial, operating and other data and
other information on the business and properties of such party
and its affiliates and subsidiaries as may be reasonably
requested from time to time. Each of the parties also agreed to
instruct its respective employees, representatives, affiliates
and subsidiaries (and the employees, representatives, affiliates
of any subsidiary or affiliate) to cooperate in good faith with
the other party and their respective representatives and,
subject to restrictions imposed by applicable law, if any, allow
the other party and their respective representatives to make all
extracts and copies of the books and records of the such party
and its affiliates and subsidiaries as may be reasonably
requested from time to time.
Notification
of Certain Matters; Supplements to Disclosure
Schedules
Hirsch agreed to give prompt notice to SCM, and SCM agreed to
give prompt notice to Hirsch, of (a) any change which would
render any of its respective representations or warranties
contained in the Merger Agreement or any ancillary agreement, if
made on or immediately following the date of such event, untrue
or inaccurate in any material
105
respect, (b) any change, condition or event that has had or
could reasonably likely have a Hirsch material adverse effect or
SCM material adverse effect, (c) any failure of Hirsch, SCM
or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates or
representatives to comply with or satisfy any covenant or
agreement or any event or condition that would otherwise result
in the non-fulfillment of any of the conditions to the other
partys obligations under the Merger Agreement,
(d) any notice or other communication from any person
alleging that the consent of such person is or may be required
in connection with the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement or the ancillary agreements
or (e) any action pending or, to the knowledge of such
party, threatened against a party or the parties relating to the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or the
ancillary agreements.
Each party also agreed to supplement, from time to time, the
information set forth on its respective disclosure schedules
with respect to any matter existing or thereafter arising that,
if existing or occurring at or prior to the date of the Merger
Agreement, would have been required to be set forth or described
in such disclosure schedules or that is necessary to correct any
information in such disclosure schedules or in any
representation or warranty of such party rendered inaccurate
thereby promptly following discovery thereof.
Employee
Benefits
Between the date of the Merger Agreement and the closing of the
Merger, Hirsch and SCM agreed to cooperate in good faith to
determine which employee benefit plans will continue after the
effective time, and whether any such plan should be amended.
Public
Announcements
Hirsch, SCM, and their respective subsidiaries, affiliates and
representatives also agreed to consult with each other before
issuing any statement or communication with respect to the
Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby,
except to the extent such party reasonably determines is
required under applicable law or, in the case of SCM, to comply
with applicable securities laws or the rules of the NASDAQ Stock
Market.
Internal
Controls and Procedures
Hirsch and SCM agreed to cooperate in good faith and to use
commercially reasonable efforts to design, and for Hirsch and
its subsidiaries to implement and maintain, a system of internal
accounting and disclosure controls and procedures that are
effective in providing assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Business
Plan
Hirsch and SCM will cooperate in good faith to develop a
post-closing business plan for the operation of the surviving
entity.
Conditions
to the Completion of the Merger
Conditions
to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the
Merger
The obligations of each of the parties to effect the Merger are
subject to the satisfaction, at or prior to the Merger, of
various mutual conditions (which may, to the extent permitted by
applicable law, be waived in writing by any party in its sole
discretion, with such waiver only effective as to the
obligations of such party), which include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of any temporary restraining order, preliminary or
permanent injunction or other order preventing the consummation
of the Merger, and no law, statute, rule, regulation, ruling or
decree shall be in effect which has the effect of making the
consummation of the Merger or the transactions contemplated by
the Merger Agreement or the ancillary agreements, illegal;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of approval of Hirschs shareholders to the
adoption of the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the Merger, and the approval of
SCMs stockholders to the issuance of shares of SCM common
stock and warrants to purchase SCM common stock in connection
with the Merger. The Merger Agreement provides that SCM must
obtain the approval of a majority of its
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding stockholders in order to satisfy this condition.
However, the parties subsequently waived this requirement, and
agreed that this condition would be satisfied upon receipt of
the approval of a majority of the shares of SCM common stock
present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote
at the SCM special meeting at which a quorum is present;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the registration statement on
Form S-4,
of which this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus is a part, must have been declared effective by the
SEC and no stop-order has been issued or pending with respect to
the
Form S-4;
|
|
|
|
the shares of SCM common stock to be issued in the Merger must
be approved for quotation (subject to notice of issuance) on the
NASDAQ Stock Market, and SCM has maintained its existing listing
on the NASDAQ Stock Market;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any action, or threatened action, by or before
any governmental authority that could:
|
|
|
|
|
|
require divestiture of any assets of SCM as a result of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or the
divestiture of any assets of Hirsch or any of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
prohibit or impose limitations on SCMs ownership or
operation of all or a material portion of its or Hirschs
business or assets (or those of any of its subsidiaries or
affiliates); or
|
|
|
|
impose limitations on the ability of SCM or its affiliates, or
render SCM or its affiliates unable, effectively to control the
business, assets or operations of Hirsch or its subsidiaries in
any material respect; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hirsch and SCM have received the opinion of Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher LLP, to the effect that, on the basis
of the facts, representations and assumptions set forth or
referred to in such opinion, the Merger will for
U.S. federal income tax purposes constitute a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
|
Conditions
to Hirschs Obligation to Effect the Merger
The obligation of Hirsch to effect the Merger is subject to the
satisfaction of several additional conditions (any of which may
be waived in writing by Hirsch), including:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations of SCM and Merger Subs must be true and
correct (disregarding all qualifications and exceptions
regarding materiality or SCM material adverse effect), both when
made and as of the closing date of the Merger (or, in the case
of representations and warranties made as of a specified date,
as of such specified date); provided that this condition is
deemed satisfied unless SCM or Merger Subs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
breach their representations and warranties and such breaches
(disregarding all qualifications and exceptions regarding
materiality or SCM material adverse effect), individually or in
the aggregate, give rise to or could reasonably give rise to a
loss, cost, damage, liability or expense of SCM or its
subsidiaries in excess of $2,500,000, or fails to perform in all
material respects any of the covenants contained in the Merger
Agreement or any ancillary agreement;
|
|
|
|
such breach(es) or failure(s) cannot be or has not been cured
within 15 days following delivery of written notice of such
breach;
|
|
|
|
and Hirsch has not waived such breach(es) or failure(s));
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM and Merger Subs must have performed, in all material
respects, all of the obligations and agreements, and complied in
all material respects with all covenants and conditions,
required to be performed or complied with them prior to or at
the closing date of the Merger;
|
|
|
|
SCM must have delivered certain certificates and other documents
required under the Merger Agreement for the closing of the
Merger;
|
|
|
|
SCM must have amended its Preferred Stock Rights Agreement to
prevent the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by
the Merger Agreement from triggering the rights thereunder;
|
|
|
|
Felix Marx must remain as chief executive officer of SCM;
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of any event, change, circumstance, occurrence,
effect or state of facts that, individually or in the aggregate,
has had or is reasonably be expected to have an SCM material
adverse effect; and
|
|
|
|
SCM has appointed Lawrence W. Midland to the SCM board of
directors, effective as of the effective time of the Merger.
|
Conditions
to SCMs and Merger Subs Obligations to Effect the
Merger
The respective obligations of SCM and Merger Subs to effect the
Merger are subject to the satisfaction of several additional
conditions (any of which may be waived in writing by SCM),
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations of Hirsch must be true and correct
(disregarding all qualifications and exceptions regarding
materiality or Hirsch material adverse effect), both when made
and as of the closing date of the Merger (or, in the case of
representations and warranties made as of a specified date, as
of such specified date); provided that this condition is deemed
satisfied unless Hirsch:
|
|
|
|
|
|
breaches its representations and warranties and such breaches
(disregarding all qualifications and exceptions regarding
materiality or Hirsch material adverse effect), individually or
in the aggregate, give rise to or could reasonably give rise to
a loss, cost, damage, liability or expense of Hirsch or its
subsidiaries in excess of $2,500,000, or fails to perform in all
material respects any of the covenants contained in the Merger
Agreement or any ancillary agreement;
|
|
|
|
such breach(es) or failure(s) cannot be or has not been cured
within 15 days following delivery of written notice of such
breach;
|
|
|
|
and SCM has not waived such breach(es) or failure(s);
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hirsch must have performed, in all material respects, all of the
obligations and agreements, and complied in all material
respects with all covenants and conditions, required to be
performed or complied with it prior to or at the closing date of
the Merger;
|
|
|
|
Hirsch must have delivered certain certificates and other
documents required under the Merger Agreement for the closing of
the Merger;
|
|
|
|
Hirsch must have obtained and delivered the consent of
Hirschs landlord and certain consents and waivers related
to the settlement agreement and related letters of
understanding, as described in more detail in the section
entitled Certain Agreements Related to the Merger;
|
|
|
|
Hirsch must have taken all action necessary with respect to the
rights of dissenting shares pursuant to the California
Corporations Code and at the effective time not more than 10% of
the shares of Hirsch common stock are dissenting shares or
eligible to become dissenting shares;
|
|
|
|
the Merger Agreement and the other transactions contemplated
thereby shall have been approved by Hirsch shareholders holding
a majority of the shares of Hirsch common stock outstanding as
of the record date for the Hirsch shareholder meeting, without
including the affirmative vote of shares of Hirsch common stock
held or beneficially owned by any of Hirschs directors who
could be deemed to have a material financial interest (as such
term is used in connection with Section 310 of the
California Corporations Code) in the transactions contemplated
by the Merger Agreement or any of the ancillary agreements, or
their affiliates;
|
|
|
|
Hirsch must have delivered to SCM executed counterparts of each
of the ancillary agreements, and all such ancillary agreements
remain in full force and effect as of the closing date of the
Merger (provided, that only three of the four employment
agreements entered into in connection with the signing of the
Merger Agreement, including the employment agreement with
Lawrence W. Midland, is required to remain in effect as of the
closing date of the Merger to satisfy this condition); and
|
|
|
|
the absence of any event, change, circumstance, occurrence,
effect or state of facts that, individually or in the aggregate,
has had or is reasonably be expected to have a Hirsch material
adverse effect.
|
108
Termination
The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
completion of the Merger, whether before or after the required
stockholder and shareholder approvals to complete the Merger
have been obtained, as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of SCM and Hirsch;
|
|
|
|
by Hirsch, if SCM or Merger Subs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
breach any of their representations or warranties contained in
the Merger Agreement or any ancillary agreement, and such
breach(es) (disregarding all qualifications and exceptions
regarding materiality or SCM material adverse effect),
individually or in the aggregate, give rise to or could
reasonably be expected to give rise to a loss, cost, damage,
liability or expense of SCM or its subsidiaries in excess of
$2,500,000, or fails to perform in all material respects any of
the covenants contained in the Merger Agreement or any ancillary
agreement;
|
|
|
|
such breach(es) or failure(s) cannot be or has not been cured
within fifteen (15) days following delivery of written
notice of such breach or failure to perform; and
|
|
|
|
such breach(es) or failure(s) have not been waived by Hirsch;
|
|
|
|
|
|
breaches any of its representations or warranties contained in
the Merger Agreement or any ancillary agreement and such
breach(es) (disregarding all qualifications and exceptions
regarding materiality or Hirsch material adverse effect),
individually or in the aggregate, give rise to or could
reasonably be expected to give rise to a loss, cost, damage,
liability or expense of Hirsch or its subsidiaries in excess of
$2,500,000, or fails to perform in all material respects any of
the covenants contained in the Merger Agreement or any ancillary
agreement;
|
|
|
|
such breach(es) or failure(s) cannot be or has not been cured
within fifteen (15) days following delivery of written
notice of such breach or failure to perform; and
|
|
|
|
such breach(es) or failure(s) have not been waived by SCM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Hirsch, if any of the conditions to its obligation to effect
the Merger, as summarized above under The Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Completion of the
Merger Conditions to Hirschs Obligation to
Effect the Merger, are incapable of fulfillment on or
prior to May 31, 2009. This date is referred to in this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus as
the outside date, provided, that if the
Form S-4
is not declared effective on or before February 15, 2009,
or SCM deems it necessary to adjourn or postpone the SCM
stockholder meeting in order to obtain approval of SCMs
stockholders, then the outside date is, instead,
June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, Hirsch may not terminate the Merger Agreement on this
basis if its action or failure to act has been a principal cause
of or resulted in the failure of such condition to be satisfied
on or prior to the outside date and such action or failure to
act constitutes either an intentional, willful or knowing breach
of its representations or warranties contained in the Merger
Agreement or any ancillary agreement, or a breach of any
covenant contained in the Merger Agreement or any ancillary
agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by SCM, if any of the conditions to its obligation to effect the
Merger, as summarized above under The Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Completion of the
Merger Conditions to SCMs and Merger
Subs Obligations to Effect the Merger, are incapable
of fulfillment on or prior to the outside date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, SCM may not terminate the Merger Agreement on this
basis if its action or failure to act has been a principal cause
of or resulted in the failure of such condition to be satisfied
on or prior to the outside date and such action or failure to
act constitutes either an intentional, willful or knowing breach
of its representations or warranties contained in the Merger
Agreement or any ancillary agreement, or a breach of any
covenant contained in the Merger Agreement or any ancillary
agreement;
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
by either Hirsch or SCM, if the First-Step Merger has not been
consummated by the outside date. However, neither Hirsch nor SCM
may terminate the Merger Agreement on this basis if its action
or failure to act has been a principal cause of or resulted in
the failure of the Merger to be consummated on or prior to the
outside date and such action or failure to act constitutes a
breach of any covenant contained in the Merger Agreement or any
ancillary agreement;
|
|
|
|
by SCM if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
at any time prior to obtaining the approval of Hirschs
shareholders: (a) the Hirsch board of directors effects a
board recommendation change; (b) Hirsch fails to include
the recommendation of the Hirsch board of directors in the joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus; or
(c) Hirsch fails publicly to reaffirm its recommendation of
the Merger within five days after a request at any time to do so
by SCM, or within five days after the date any SCM acquisition
proposal or any material modification thereto is first
commenced, published or sent or given to the Hirsch shareholders
(which reaffirmation must also include, with respect to an
Hirsch acquisition proposal, an unconditional rejection of such
Hirsch acquisition proposal, it being understood that taking no
position with respect to the acceptance of such Hirsch
acquisition proposal or modification thereto shall constitute a
failure to reject such Hirsch acquisition proposal);
|
|
|
|
Hirsch or the Hirsch board of directors (or any committee
thereof): (a) approves, adopts, endorses or recommends any
Hirsch acquisition proposal; or (b) approves, adopts,
endorses or recommends, or enters into or allows Hirsch or any
of its subsidiaries to enter into, a letter of intent, agreement
in principle or definitive agreement for a Hirsch acquisition
proposal; or
|
|
|
|
Hirsch or the Hirsch board of directors (or any committee
thereof) authorizes or publicly proposes any of the foregoing;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Hirsch, pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and
subject to the conditions discussed above with respect to a
Hirsch acquisition proposal; or
|
|
|
|
by SCM if, at any time prior to obtaining the approval of
SCMs stockholders, the SCM board of directors has
determined to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to
an SCM superior proposal.
|
Effect
of Termination
If the Merger is terminated as described in the section entitled
The Merger Agreement Termination above,
the Merger Agreement will be void and there will be no liability
on either party, except that designated provisions of the Merger
Agreement, including the provisions regarding the termination
fees described below, will survive termination.
Fees and
Expenses
Fees
Paid to SCM
Hirsch must pay SCM a termination fee equal to $1,500,000, plus
an amount equal to all out-of-pocket expenses (excluding the
cost of SCMs employee time) incurred by SCM in connection
with the Merger Agreement, the ancillary agreements, and the
transactions contemplated thereby, if SCM terminates the Merger
Agreement because:
|
|
|
|
|
at any time prior to obtaining the approval of Hirschs
shareholders: (a) the Hirsch board of directors effects a
board recommendation change; (b) Hirsch fails to include
the recommendation of the Hirsch board of directors in the joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus; or
(c) Hirsch fails to publicly reaffirm its recommendation of
the Merger within five days after a request at any time to do so
by SCM, or within five days after the date any Hirsch
acquisition proposal or any material modification thereto is
first commenced, published or sent or given to the Hirsch
shareholders (which reaffirmation must also include, with
respect to an Hirsch acquisition proposal, an unconditional
rejection of such Hirsch acquisition proposal, it being
understood that taking no position with respect to the
acceptance of such Hirsch
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition proposal or modification thereto shall constitute a
failure to reject such Hirsch acquisition proposal);
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hirsch or the Hirsch board of directors (or any committee
thereof): (a) approves, adopts, endorses or recommends any
Hirsch acquisition proposal; or (b) approves, adopts,
endorses or recommends, or enters into or allows Hirsch or any
of its subsidiaries to enter into, a letter of intent, agreement
in principle or definitive agreement for a Hirsch acquisition
proposal;
|
|
|
|
Hirsch or the Hirsch board of directors (or any committee
thereof) authorizes or publicly proposes any of the
foregoing; or
|
|
|
|
Hirsch intentionally, willfully, or knowingly (a) breaches
any of its representations or warranties contained in the Merger
Agreement or any ancillary agreement and such breach(es)
(disregarding all qualifications and exceptions regarding
materiality or Hirsch material adverse effect), individually or
in the aggregate, give rise to or could reasonably be expected
to give rise to a loss, cost, damage, liability or expense of
Hirsch or its subsidiaries in excess of $2,500,000, or fails to
perform in all material respects any of the covenants contained
in the Merger Agreement or any ancillary agreement;
(b) such breach(es) or failure(s) cannot be or has not been
cured within 15 days following delivery of written notice
of such breach or failure to perform; and such breach(es) or
failure(s) have not been waived by SCM. However, in the event
such breaches are not intentional, willful, or knowing, then
instead of the termination fees set forth above, Hirsch must pay
SCM a termination fee of $600,000, plus an amount equal to all
out-of-pocket expenses (excluding the cost of SCMs
employee time) incurred by SCM in connection with the Merger
Agreement, the ancillary agreements and the transactions
contemplated thereby.
|
Fees
Paid to Hirsch
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, SCM must pay Hirsch a
termination fee equal to $1,500,000, plus an amount equal to all
out-of-pocket expenses (excluding the cost of Hirschs
employee time) incurred by Hirsch in connection with the Merger
Agreement, the ancillary agreements, and the transactions
contemplated thereby, if Hirsch terminates the Merger Agreement
because:
|
|
|
|
|
at any time prior to obtaining the approval of SCMs
stockholders: (a) the SCM board of directors effects a
board recommendation change; (b) SCM fails to include the
recommendation of the SCM board of directors in the joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus; or (c) SCM
fails publicly to reaffirm its recommendation of the Merger
within five days after a request at any time to do so by Hirsch,
or within five days after the date any SCM acquisition proposal
or any material modification thereto is first commenced,
published or sent or given to the SCM stockholders (which
reaffirmation must also include, with respect to an SCM
acquisition proposal, an unconditional rejection of such SCM
acquisition proposal, it being understood that taking no
position with respect to the acceptance of such Hirsch
acquisition proposal or modification thereto shall constitute a
failure to reject such SCM acquisition proposal);
|
|
|
|
SCM or the SCM board of directors (or any committee thereof):
(a) approves, adopts, endorses or recommends any Hirsch
acquisition proposal; or (b) approves, adopts, endorses or
recommends, or enters into or allows SCM or any of its
subsidiaries to enter into, a letter of intent, agreement in
principle or definitive agreement for an SCM acquisition
proposal;
|
|
|
|
SCM or the SCM board of directors (or any committee thereof)
authorizes or publicly proposes any of the foregoing; or
|
|
|
|
SCM intentionally, willfully, or knowingly (a) breaches any
of its representations or warranties contained in the Merger
Agreement or any ancillary agreement and such breach(es)
(disregarding all qualifications and exceptions regarding
materiality or SCM material adverse effect), individually or in
the aggregate, give rise to or could reasonably be expected to
give rise to a loss, cost, damage, liability or expense of SCM
or its subsidiaries in excess of $2,500,000, or fails to perform
in all material respects any of the covenants contained in the
Merger Agreement or any ancillary agreement; (b) such
breach(es) or failure(s) cannot be or has not been cured within
15 days following delivery of written notice of such breach
or failure to perform; and such breach(es) or failure(s) have
not been waived by Hirsch. However, in the event such breaches
are
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
not intentional, willful, or knowing, then instead of the
termination fees set forth above, SCM must pay Hirsch a
termination fee of $600,000, plus an amount equal to all
out-of-pocket expenses (excluding the cost of Hirschs
employee time) incurred by Hirsch in connection with the Merger
Agreement, the ancillary agreements and the transactions
contemplated thereby.
|
Amendment
The Merger Agreement may be amended by the parties by action
taken or authorized by their respective boards of directors,
except that after the Merger Agreement has been adopted by the
stockholders of SCM or shareholders of Hirsch, no amendment
which by law requires further approval by the stockholders of
SCM or shareholders of Hirsch, as the case may be, shall be made
without such further approval.
112
CERTAIN
AGREEMENTS RELATED TO THE MERGER
The following summary describes the material provisions of
certain agreements that have been entered into in connection
with, or otherwise relate to, the Merger. Copies of these
agreements are attached as Annexes B through D and
Annexes G through N, to this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus and are
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus. The rights and obligations of the
parties to these agreements are governed by the express terms
and conditions of such agreements, respectively, and not by this
summary. This summary may not contain all of the information
about these agreements that may be important to the stockholders
of SCM and shareholders of Hirsch, and are qualified in their
entirety by reference to the complete text of these agreements.
We encourage you to read these agreements carefully and in their
entirety for a more complete understanding of these
agreements.
Irrevocable
Proxy and Voting Agreement
In order to induce SCM to enter into the Merger Agreement,
several Hirsch securityholders, including members of
Hirschs board of directors, management and their
respective affiliates entered into irrevocable proxy and voting
agreement with SCM, the Merger Subs and Hirsch. As of the record
date for the Hirsch special meeting, Hirsch shareholders that
entered into the irrevocable proxy and voting agreement owned in
the aggregate 1,021,456 shares of Hirsch common stock,
representing approximately 22% of the outstanding shares of
Hirsch common stock as of the record date for the Hirsch special
meeting. A copy of the irrevocable proxy and voting agreement is
attached as Annex B to this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus.
The irrevocable proxy and voting agreement includes the
following provisions, among others:
Agreement
to Vote; Grant of Proxy
The Hirsch shareholders who are parties to the irrevocable proxy
and voting agreement have agreed, solely in their capacity as
Hirsch shareholders, and among other things, to vote all of
their shares of Hirsch common stock in favor of the Merger and
the adoption of the Merger Agreement, against any Hirsch
acquisition proposals, against any action or agreement that
would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of the Merger
Agreement by Hirsch, against any change in a majority of the
individuals serving on the Hirsch board of directors as of the
date of the signing of the Merger Agreement (subject to certain
exceptions), and against any other action or agreement which is
intended, or could reasonably be expected to, impede, interfere
with, delay, postpone, or materially adversely affect the Merger
or any of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement. The Hirsch shareholders that are parties to the
irrevocable proxy and voting agreement also granted SCM an
irrevocable proxy to vote their respective Hirsch common stock
in accordance with the terms of the irrevocable proxy and voting
agreement.
Transfer
Restrictions
Subject to certain exceptions, the Hirsch shareholders that are
a parties to the irrevocable proxy and voting agreement have
agreed not to, directly or indirectly, sell or transfer Hirsch
common stock held by them, or grant any proxies or powers of
attorney with respect thereto, until the earlier of the
termination of the Merger Agreement or the completion of the
Merger. To the extent that any such sale or transfer is
permitted pursuant to exceptions included within the irrevocable
proxy and voting agreement, each person to which any shares of
Hirsch common stock are so sold or transferred will be bound by
the terms of the irrevocable proxy and voting agreement.
Stockholder
Agreement
In order to induce SCM to enter into the Merger Agreement,
several Hirsch securityholders, including members of
Hirschs board of directors, management and their
respective affiliates entered into a stockholder agreement with
SCM. As of the record date for the Hirsch special meeting, the
Hirsch shareholders that entered into the stockholder agreement
owned in the aggregate 1,021,456 shares of Hirsch common
stock, representing approximately 22% of the outstanding Hirsch
common stock as of the record date for the Hirsch special
meeting. A copy of the stockholder agreement is attached as
Annex C to this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
113
The stockholder agreement includes the following provisions,
among others:
Standstill
Agreement
The Hirsch shareholders who are parties to the stockholder
agreement agreed to a three-year standstill period
beginning on the closing date of the Merger. During the
standstill period, such parties agreed that, subject to limited
circumstances, they would not take certain actions that could be
hostile to SCM, including without limitation proposing or
entering into any acquisition transaction with a third party
with respect to SCM, acquiring shares of SCM common stock that
would result in such stockholder holding more than 10% of
SCMs outstanding shares, participating in or encouraging
the solicitation of proxies with respect to SCM securities or
the securities of its subsidiaries, participating in or
encouraging the formation of any group which owns, seeks, or
offers to acquire beneficial ownership of SCMs voting
securities or which seeks to control SCM, or otherwise act alone
or in concert with others seeking or offering to control or
influence the management of SCMs board of directors or the
policies of SCM or its subsidiaries.
Lock-Up
Agreement
Lawrence W. Midland and his controlled affiliates have agreed to
a more restrictive
lock-up
arrangement with respect to the shares of SCM common stock and
warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock issued in
connection with the Merger. Specifically, except in limited
circumstances, Mr. Midland and his affiliates are
prohibited from selling or transferring, or granting or lending
or otherwise disposing of, such securities for up to
24 months following the closing date of the Merger. The
lock-up
arrangement provides that thirty-three and three-tenths percent
(33.3%) of the shares subject to the
lock-up
restrictions will be released from such restrictions one year
from the closing date of the Merger, an additional thirty-three
and three-tenths percent (33.3%) will be released 18 months
from the closing date of the Merger, and the remainder of the
shares subject to such restrictions will be released two years
from the closing date of the Merger. The
lock-up
arrangement agreed to by Mr. Midland and his controlled
affiliates under the stockholder agreement is different than the
lock-up
arrangement to which other Hirsch shareholders will be subject
to following completion of the Merger. See The
Merger Agreement
Lock-Up
for additional information about the alternative
lock-up
arrangement.
As of the record date for the Hirsch special meeting, Lawrence
W. Midland and his controlled affiliates beneficially owned in
the aggregate 628,800 shares of Hirsch common stock,
representing approximately 13% of the outstanding Hirsch
common stock as of the record date for the Hirsch special
meeting.
Agreement
to Vote; Election of Directors
The Hirsch shareholders who are parties to the stockholder
agreement agreed that for a period of three years after the
closing date of the Merger, subject to limited circumstances
relating to Lawrence W. Midlands status as a director on
SCMs board of directors, they will vote all shares of SCM
common stock owned by them to elect any director nominee that is
recommended by the majority of SCMs board of directors,
remove any director when such removal is requested or approved
by a majority of SCMs board of directors or the SCM
nominating committee, or oppose the removal or any director
unless such removal is approved by a majority of SCMs
board of directors. The stockholders also granted SCM an
irrevocable proxy to vote their respective SCM common stock in
accordance with the stockholder agreement.
Warrants
The following is a description of the warrants to purchase
shares of SCM common stock that are to be issued (i) as
part of the merger consideration to Hirsch shareholders,
(ii) in exchange for any warrants to purchase Hirsch common
stock that are outstanding as of the effective time of the
Merger, and (iii) to the former Hirsch directors as
compensation for their service to Hirsch in 2008. A copy of the
form of warrant agreement is attached as Annex D to
this joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus.
114
Exercise
Price; Expiration
Warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock that are issued
as part of the merger consideration to Hirsch shareholders, or
to the former Hirsch directors as compensation for their service
to Hirsch in 2008, will have an exercise price of $3.00 per
share. The exercise price for warrants to purchase shares of SCM
common stock issued in exchange for any warrants to purchase
Hirsch common stock that are outstanding as of the effective
time of the Merger will be determined by dividing the per share
exercise price of the Hirsch common stock subject to each
warrant as in effect immediately prior to the effective time of
the Merger by the conversion ratio, and rounding that result up
to the nearest cent.
All of the warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock will
expire on the fifth anniversary of the effective time of the
Merger and will be exercisable for two years following the third
anniversary of the effective time of the Merger (the
exercise period).
Exercise
The registered holder of a warrant to purchase shares of SCM
common stock can exercise all or any portion of the warrants
evidenced by the warrant certificate by delivering on any
business day during the exercise period to American Stock
Transfer and Trust Company, the transfer agent,
(i) the warrant certificate, (ii) a subscription form
substantially in the form attached to the warrant certificate,
as duly and properly executed by the registered holder, and
(iii) an amount equal to the aggregate exercise price for
the number of full shares of SCM common stock as to which
warrants are exercised, and (iv) any and all applicable
withholding taxes due in connection with the exercise of the
warrants.
Adjustments
to Prevent Dilution
The exercise price per share of SCM common stock and the number
of shares of SCM common stock issuable upon any subsequent
exercise of the warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock
will be appropriately and proportionately adjusted in the event
that SCM sets a record date for a reclassification, split or
subdivision of the outstanding shares of SCM common stock, or
determination of the holders of SCM common stock entitled to
receive a stock dividend or other stock-based distribution or
grant of additional shares, provided that the holders do not pay
any consideration for the additional shares of common stock or
common stock equivalents received.
Effect
of a Merger
If there is a sale of all or substantially all of SCMs
properties and assets to another person, or a merger or
consolidation of SCM with and into another corporation pursuant
to which SCM is not the surviving entity and stockholders of SCM
immediately prior to such merger or consolidation control less
than 50% of the voting securities of the surviving entity, then
as part of such sale provisions shall be made such that the
holder of the warrant to purchase shares of SCM common stock
will thereafter be entitled to receive, during the period
specified by the warrant, an equivalent number of shares of
common stock or other securities or property of the surviving
entity that the holder would have been entitled to in such sale
if the warrant to purchase shares of SCM common stock had been
exercised immediately prior to the sale. Appropriate adjustment
shall be made to the exercise price of the warrant to purchase
shares of SCM common stock so that the aggregate exercise price
of the warrants remain substantially the same.
Transfer
Restrictions
Subject to certain limited exceptions, the warrants to purchase
shares of SCM common stock will not be transferable by the
holder without the prior written consent of SCM.
Transfer
and Replacement
In the event of a permitted transfer of any or all of the
warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock evidenced by a
warrant certificate, such transfer will be made on the registry
maintained for such purpose at the principal office of SCM only
upon (i) surrender to SCM of a warrant certificate duly and
properly endorsed by the
115
registered holder, (ii) payment by the holder of any
necessary transfer tax or other governmental charge imposed upon
such transfer (with reasonable evidence of such payment provided
to SCM), and (iii) receipt by SCM from the registered
holder and the proposed transferee of an assignment agreement
substantially in the form attached to the warrant certificate
that have been duly and properly executed by the registered
holder and the transferee. Upon due presentment of the items
described in (i)-(iii) above, a new warrant certificate or
warrant certificates of like tenor and evidencing in the
aggregate a like number of warrants as the surrendered warrant
certificate will be issued to the transferee and the registered
holder, as applicable, in exchange for the surrendered warrant
certificate and thereafter the surrendered warrant certificate
will be cancelled. Until a transfer of the warrant certificate
is duly registered on the books of SCM, as described above, SCM
may treat the registered holder as the owner for all purposes.
Upon receipt by SCM of (i) evidence reasonably satisfactory
to it of the ownership of and the loss, theft, destruction or
mutilation of a warrant certificate, (ii) in case of loss,
theft or destruction, an indemnity agreement
and/or
security from the registered holder reasonably satisfactory to
SCM, (iii) in the case of mutilation, a warrant certificate
for surrender and cancellation, and (iv) reimbursement from
the holder of all reasonable expenses incidental thereto, SCM
will make and deliver to the registered holder a new warrant
certificate of like tenor and evidencing in the aggregate a like
number of warrants as the replaced warrant certificate dated as
of the date of such cancellation (but without any change in the
expiration date), in lieu of the replaced warrant certificate.
Share
Rights
The accrual of dividends, if any, on the shares of common stock
issued upon the exercise of any warrant to purchase shares of
SCM common stock evidenced by a warrant certificate will be
governed by the terms generally applicable to SCM common stock.
Neither a warrant certificate nor the warrants to purchase
shares of SCM common stock evidenced thereby shall entitle any
holder thereof to any of the rights of a holder of shares of SCM
common stock, including, without limitation, the right to
receive dividends, if any, or payments upon the liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of SCM or to exercise any preemptive
rights to vote or to consent or to receive notice as
stockholders in respect of the meetings of stockholders or the
election of directors of SCM or any other matter.
Amendment
to Rights Agreement
On November 8, 2002, the SCM board of directors declared a
dividend of one preferred share purchase right to purchase one
one-thousandth of a share of SCMs series A
participating preferred stock for each outstanding share of SCM
common stock. The dividend was payable on the record date of
November 25, 2002 to stockholders of record as of the close
of business on that date. Certificates representing SCM common
stock issued after the record date contain a notation
incorporating the rights agreement by reference. The terms of
the rights are governed by a preferred stock rights agreement,
dated as of November 8, 2002, between SCM and American
Stock Transfer & Trust. The rights only become
exercisable if a person or group of affiliated or associated
persons (an Acquiring Person) has acquired, or
obtained the right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 15% or
more of the shares of SCM common stock then outstanding, or
announces a tender or exchange offer, the consummation of which
would result in ownership by a person or group of 15% or more of
SCM common stock then outstanding.
On December 10, 2008, SCM and the rights agent entered into
the first amendment to the rights agreement to provide that the
execution or delivery of the Merger Agreement and the public
announcement and consummation of the transactions contemplated
by the Merger Agreement and the ancillary agreements will not
cause: (i) the rights to purchase series A
participating SCM preferred stock pursuant to the rights
agreement to become exercisable under the rights agreement;
(ii) Hirsch or any of its affiliates to be deemed an
Acquiring Person; or (iii) a Triggering Event, the
Distribution Date or the Shares Acquisition Date (as such terms
are defined in the Rights Agreement) to occur.
Employment
Agreements with Hirsch Executive Officers
In connection with the Merger, Lawrence W. Midland, a Hirsch
director and the President of Hirsch, has entered into an
employment agreement with SCM to become effective on the
effective time of the Merger. Under the terms of the employment
agreement, Mr. Midland will receive a base salary of
$250,000 and is also eligible to receive target-orientated,
variable quarterly and annual bonuses under the SCM Management
by Objective Bonus
116
Plan, up to an aggregate annual amount equal to 80% of his
annual base salary. The targets that are the basis for any
payments to Mr. Midland under the SCM Management by
Objective Bonus Plan have not yet been determined, but will be
based on corporate financial targets set by the SCM compensation
committee. Subject to approval by the SCM board of directors,
Mr. Midland is eligible to receive an option grant to
purchase up to 40,000 shares of SCM common stock under
SCMs 2007 Stock Option Plan. The exercise price of the
shares subject to the option will be equal to the closing price
of SCMs common stock, as quoted by the NASDAQ Stock
Market, on the date the grant of option is approved by the SCM
board of directors. Mr. Midland is also eligible to receive
certain other benefits as are provided to other employees of
Hirsch occupying positions with responsibility and salary
comparable to that of Mr. Midland.
In connection with the Merger, Robert Beliles, an executive
officer of Hirsch, has entered into an employment agreement with
Hirsch to become effective on the effective time of the Merger.
Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Beliles is
to receive a base salary of $200,000 and is also eligible to
receive target-orientated, variable quarterly and annual bonuses
under the SCM Management by Objective Bonus Plan up to an
aggregate annual amount equal to 40% of his annual base salary.
The targets that are the basis for any payments to
Mr. Beliles under the SCM Management by Objective Bonus
Plan have not yet been determined, but will be based on
corporate financial targets set by the compensation committee.
Subject to approval by the SCM board of directors,
Mr. Beliles is eligible to receive an option grant to
purchase up to 25,000 shares of SCM common stock under
SCMs 2007 Stock Option Plan. The exercise price of the
shares subject to the option will be equal to the closing price
of SCMs common stock, as quoted by the NASDAQ Stock
Market, on the date the grant of option is approved by the SCM
board of directors. Mr. Beliles is also eligible to receive
certain other benefits as are provided to other employees of
Hirsch occupying positions with responsibility and salary
comparable to that of Mr. Beliles.
In connection with the Merger, John Piccininni, an executive
officer of Hirsch, has entered into an employment agreement with
Hirsch to become effective on the effective time of the Merger.
Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Piccininni
is to receive a base salary of $144,000 and is also eligible to
receive target-orientated, variable quarterly and annual bonuses
under the SCM Management by Objective Bonus Plan up to an
aggregate annual amount equal to 40% of his annual base salary.
The targets that are the basis for any payments to
Mr. Piccininni under the SCM Management by Objective Bonus
Plan have not yet been determined, but will be based on
corporate financial targets set by the compensation committee.
Subject to approval by the SCM board of directors,
Mr. Piccininni is eligible to receive an option grant to
purchase up to 25,000 shares of SCM common stock under
SCMs 2007 Stock Option Plan. The exercise price of the
shares subject to the option will be equal to the closing price
of SCMs common stock, as quoted by the NASDAQ Stock
Market, on the date the grant of option is approved by the SCM
board of directors. Mr. Piccininni is also eligible to
receive certain other benefits as are provided to other
employees of Hirsch occupying positions with responsibility and
salary comparable to that of Mr. Piccininni.
In connection with the Merger, Robert Zivney, an executive
officer of Hirsch, has entered into an employment agreement with
Hirsch to become effective on the effective time of the Merger.
Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Zivney is
to receive a base salary of $180,000 and is also eligible to
receive target-orientated, variable quarterly and annual bonuses
under the SCM Management by Objective Bonus Plan up to an
aggregate annual amount equal to 40% of his annual base salary.
The targets that are the basis for any payments to
Mr. Zivney under the SCM Management by Objective Bonus Plan
have not yet been determined, but will be based on corporate
financial targets set by the compensation committee. Subject to
approval by the SCM board of directors, Mr. Zivney is
eligible to receive an option grant to purchase up to
25,000 shares of SCM common stock under SCMs 2007
Stock Option Plan. The exercise price of the shares subject to
the option will be equal to the closing price of SCMs
common stock, as quoted by the NASDAQ Stock Market, on the date
the grant of option is approved by the SCM board of directors.
Mr. Zivney is also eligible to receive certain other
benefits as are provided to other employees of Hirsch occupying
positions with responsibility and salary comparable to that of
Mr. Zivney.
As a condition to the obligation of SCM to complete the Merger,
three out of the four above described employment agreements,
including the employment agreement with Lawrence W. Midland,
must remain in effect as of the closing date of the Merger.
117
Non-Competition
and Non-Solicitation Agreement
In order to induce SCM to enter into the Merger Agreement,
Lawrence W. Midland entered into a non-competition and
non-solicitation agreement with SCM whereby Mr. Midland
agreed that for a period of one (1) year following the
closing of the Merger he would not, without the prior written
consent of SCM, engage in competitive behavior with SCM, or
solicit the surviving subsidiarys or SCMs employees
or customers, as described more fully in the non-competition and
non-solicitation agreement, a copy of which is attached to this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus as
Annex J. A copy of the non-competition and
non-solicitation agreement is attached as Annex J to
this joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus.
Settlement
Agreement
Effective November 14, 1994, Hirsch entered into a
settlement agreement with two limited partnerships, Keyboards
and Networks. Hirsch had previously obtained funding and the
exclusive rights to certain patents and technology from
Keyboards (in 1981) and Networks (in 1986), and the parties
entered into the settlement agreement in order to clarify the
royalties to be paid by Hirsch to each of Keyboards and Networks
under the previous agreements.
Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, Hirsch is
obligated to pay a royalty of 4.25% on Hirsch gross revenues
allocated to Keyboards for the period from December 1, 1994
to December 31, 2020, and a royalty of 5.5% on Hirsch
revenues allocated to Networks for the period from
December 1, 1994 to December 31, 2011. The settlement
agreement provides an allocation schedule by which, in the first
year, 55.56% of Hirsch revenues on which the royalties are
calculated were allocated to Keyboards and 44.44% were allocated
to Networks. In each subsequent year through 2011, the
percentage of revenues allocated to Keyboards is increased by
2.08% and the percentage allocated to Networks is decreased by
2.08%, such that in the year ending November 30, 2008,
Hirsch revenues were allocated 82.60% to Keyboards and 17.40% to
Networks. From January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2020,
the royalty to be paid to Keyboards will be based on 100% of the
revenues recognized by Hirsch. The royalties are payable when
cash is received for the revenue recognized. The final payment
to Networks is due on January 30, 2012. The final royalty
payment to Keyboards is due on January 30, 2021.
Hirsch also has various reporting and other notice obligations
to Keyboards and Networks under the terms of the settlement
agreement, including notifying Keyboards and Networks prior to
entering into new lines of businesses. In connection with the
signing of the Merger Agreement, two of the four general
partners of Secure Keyboards, Ltd., and the two general partners
of Secure Networks, Ltd. delivered letters of understanding to
SCM regarding the proposed treatment of royalty payments under
the settlement agreement following the Merger, based on the
proposed structure of the Hirsch and SCM business relationship,
as described in more detail below.
Keyboards
and Networks Letters of Understanding
In connection with the signing of the Merger Agreement, Robert
J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland, as two of the four general
partners of Keyboards, delivered a letter of understanding to
SCM, as amended and restated January 30, 2009. In addition,
Robert J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland, as the two general
partners of Networks, delivered a substantially similar letter
of understanding to SCM, as amended and restated
January 30, 2009.
Each letter of understanding was prepared in connection with
SCMs desire to clarify a proposed structure of the
business relationship between SCM and Hirsch as it affects or
relates to royalty payments to Keyboards or Networks, as
applicable, under the existing Settlement Agreement. Subject to
the consummation of the Merger, each letter of understanding
contained the following clarifications of the SCM and Hirsch
business relationship and its resulting impact on the
companies respective revenue streams and on
Keyboards or Networks revenue base, as applicable,
which clarifications were acknowledged and accepted by Robert J.
Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland in their capacities as general
partners of Keyboards and Networks, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of existing Hirsch products, which includes products made
by Hirsch and others, through existing Hirsch distribution will
remain Hirsch revenues and part of the revenue base for
Keyboards or Networks, as applicable. If SCM technology replaces
the current Hirsch physical access reader offerings on products
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
which continue to be sold through existing Hirsch distribution,
such products will continue to be included in Hirsch revenues
and the revenue base for Keyboards or Networks, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hirsch will continue in part to independently develop its own
products and, as sold through Hirsch existing distribution
channels, will continue to be included in Hirsch revenues and
the revenue base for Keyboards or Networks, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
If SCM were to compete in Hirschs general marketplace and
sell similar products made by Hirsch and Hirschs
competitors or others such SCM sales would not be included in
Hirsch revenue or the revenue base for Keyboards or Networks, as
applicable.
|
|
|
|
If SCM were to sell Hirsch products through SCM distribution
outside of the existing Hirsch distribution network, SCM shall
function as a Hirsch dealer, with a most favorable dealer
discount of 50% of the list price from the then current Hirsch
price list. Any such purchases at the 50% dealer discount will
result in and be included in Hirsch revenue and the revenue base
for Keyboards or Networks, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
SCMs sale of products outside of Hirschs access
control business model and other SCM products will remain SCM
sales and revenues and have no bearing on Hirsch revenues or the
revenue base for Keyboards or Networks, as applicable. However,
if Hirsch decides to sell an integrated logical and physical
access solution, Hirsch will be able to buy SCM products at the
most favorable price offered by SCM and resell them. Royalties
should then be paid on the physical access solution and the
integration part for the converged solution. Should SCM decide
to sell an integrated logical and physical access solution, SCM
should then buy Hirsch products as part of that solution at the
most favorable price.
|
|
|
|
To the extent SCM and Hirsch choose to co-develop products,
Hirsch will attempt to make an equitable determination of the
relative values as if the companies were independent, regardless
of whether such products are sold through Hirsch or SCM
distribution channels. If Keyboards or Networks objects to any
determination, the matter will be referred to an independent
third party to determine the relative valuations, provided that
if Hirsch and Keyboards or Networks, as applicable, cannot agree
on an independent third party, they will have a mediator select
a qualified and independent third party.
|
Consents
Related to Settlement Agreement and Letters of
Understanding
Among other conditions, the obligation of SCM and Merger Subs to
complete the Merger is subject to SCMs receipt or waiver
of the following consents related to the settlement agreement
and related letters of understanding:
|
|
|
|
|
the consent to the Merger and waiver of any rights to notice by
Keyboards and Networks pursuant to the terms of the settlement
agreement, executed by each respective general partner; and
|
|
|
|
the consent of each of the two other of the four general
partners of Keyboards who have not delivered a consent to become
a party to and bound by the letter of understanding delivered to
SCM by Robert J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland, as general
partners of Keyboard.
|
On February 9, 2009 and February 11, 2009, counsel
representing the two general partners of Keyboards who are not
currently a party to the letter of understanding sent
communications to SCM and Hirsch objecting to the letter of
understanding, and indicating that the two general partners will
not sign the letter of understanding. There can be no assurance
that any disagreements relating to the letter of understanding
can be resolved amicably between the parties. If the parties are
not able to resolve the matter, a condition to SCMs
obligation to close the Merger will not be satisfied and, if SCM
decides not to waive this condition, the Merger will not be
consummated.
If SCM decides to waive this closing condition and the Merger is
consummated without the consent of the two other general
partners of Keyboards, SCM and Hirsch face the risk of
litigation being brought by these two general partners relating
to the settlement agreement and the amount of royalties to which
Keyboards is entitled. There is no guarantee that SCM and Hirsch
will prevail in any such litigation and SCMs results of
operations may be materially harmed as a result of the
litigation, in addition to diverting managements attention
away from operations to attend to the litigation.
119
Hirsch
EMEA, Inc. Stock Purchase
As a condition to the closing of the Merger, Hirsch entered into
a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated December 15,
2008, for the purchase of the approximately 70.6% of the
outstanding shares of capital stock of Hirsch EMEA, Inc., a
British Virgin Island corporation, not already owned by Hirsch.
One of the parties from which Hirsch purchased shares of Hirsch
EMEA, Inc. was tSecu, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability
company which is an affiliate of Ayman Ashour, a former director
of Hirsch. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase and Sale
Agreement, tSecu, LLC, received $260,000 and 52,000 shares
of Hirsch (now held by Ayman Ashour) in exchange for the
approximately 37.5% of the outstanding Hirsch EMEA, Inc. shares
owned by tSecu, LLC. Nicola Caletti, President of Hirsch EMEA,
Inc., received $240,000 and 48,000 shares of Hirsch in
exchange for the approximately 33% of the outstanding Hirsch
EMEA, Inc. shares owned by him. Pursuant to the terms of the
Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement, Hirsch also acquired options
to purchase all or any portion of the outstanding capital of a
Hirsch EMEA, Inc. subsidiary. This transaction closed on
December 15, 2008 and Hirsch EMEA, Inc. is now a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Hirsch.
120
INFORMATION
ABOUT SCM MICROSYSTEMS
Overview
Founded in 1990 in Munich, Germany and incorporated in 1996
under the laws of the state of Delaware, SCM designs, develops
and sells hardware and system solutions that enable people to
conveniently and securely access digital content and services.
SCM sells its secure digital access products into two market
segments: Secure Authentication and Digital Media and
Connectivity.
|
|
|
|
|
For the Secure Authentication market, SCM offers a full range of
smart card reader technology solutions to address the need for
smart card-based security in a range of applications and
environments, including PCs, networks, physical facilities and
authentication programs. SCMs Secure Authentication
products enable authentication of individuals for applications
such as electronic passports and drivers licenses,
electronic healthcare cards, secure logical access to PCs and
networks, and physical access to facilities. As a leader in this
market, SCM has sold more than 15 million readers for
digital authentication programs in the government, enterprise
and financial sectors. In recent years, SCM also has been a
significant supplier of contactless infrastructure components
for eGovernment and enterprise authentication programs
throughout Europe and to large enterprises in Japan. SCM also
offers a range of smart card-based productivity solutions, which
include readers and software, for small and medium-size
businesses under its CHIPDRIVE
brand®.
|
|
|
|
For the Digital Media and Connectivity market, SCM offers
commercial digital media readers that are used in digital kiosks
to transfer digital content to and from various flash media.
|
SCM sells its Secure Authentication products primarily to
original equipment manufacturers (each, an OEM),
that typically either bundle its products with their own
solutions, or repackage its products for resale to their
customers. SCMs OEM customers typically sell its smart
card reader technology to government contractors, systems
integrators, large enterprises and computer manufacturers, as
well as to banks and other financial institutions. In some
cases, SCM also sells directly to system integrators and
government contractors. SCM sells its digital media readers
primarily to major brand computer and photo processing equipment
manufacturers. SCM sells and licenses its products through a
direct sales and marketing organization, as well as through
distributors, value added resellers and systems integrators
worldwide.
Recent
Trends and Strategies for Growth
In recent years, SCM has directed significant attention to
improving the efficiency of its operations, which has resulted
in a significant reduction in expenses from previous levels,
close management of continuing expenditures and ongoing
reductions in product and manufacturing costs. Top line revenue
growth has been more difficult to effect, as U.S. and
European government programs, which comprise a significant
portion of SCMs sales, have remained unpredictable in
terms of timing and in some cases have experienced protracted
delays.
In late 2007, SCM embarked on a multi-pronged strategy to expand
and diversify its customer base, fully capture emerging market
opportunities and accelerate long-term growth. The primary
component of the strategy is the development of a range of new
contactless and near field communication (NFC) infrastructure
products to enable fast growing contactless applications and
services for the electronic transaction market (including
payment and ticketing), government and enterprise customers.
Additionally, SCM is developing programs to market its existing
product offerings into new geographic regions. To ensure
appropriate resources for its strategy, in the last year, SCM
has strengthened its management team with key executive hires
and promotions and brought in marketing and product management
professionals from the contactless industry to execute on its
contactless product roadmap. Further, SCM has adopted a more
active approach to partnering with other companies that can
provide complementary resources and strengths. For example, in
mid-2008, SCM collaborated with XIRING, a French security
solutions company, to develop a mobile eHealth terminal for the
German electronic health card system. In April 2008, SCM began
working with TranZfinity, a transactions solutions provider, to
develop SCMs
@MAXX®
family of contactless readers and to provide application
services for those readers; and in October 2008 SCM took an
equity position in TranZfinity.
121
The third component of SCMs multi-pronged growth strategy
is to actively seek merger and acquisition opportunities to
expand its business, reinforce its market position in targeted
areas and fully leverage its strengths and opportunities. The
Merger with Hirsch also supports SCMs growth strategy by
doubling the companys revenues, diversifying its customer
base and positioning SCM to better address the growing market
demand for solutions that address both IT security and physical
access.
SCM has been investing in new products, resources, programs and
business development activities to support the growth strategies
described above and in 2008 this has resulted in increased
operating expenses year over year. SCM believes these
investments are critical to the success of its growth strategies
and it expects to continue to invest in these strategies in the
future.
Overview
of the Market for Secure Access and Authentication
Solutions
Individuals, businesses, governments and educational
institutions increasingly rely upon computer networks, the
Internet and intranets for information, entertainment and
services. The proliferation of and reliance upon electronic data
and electronic transactions has created an increasing need to
protect the integrity of digital data, as well as to control
access to electronic networks and the devices that connect to
them. For government entities and large corporate enterprises,
there is a need to restrict and manage access to shared networks
and intranets to prevent loss of proprietary data. In addition,
there is a need to manage and monitor access to information
stored on identification cards used in new government-driven
programs around the world, such as electronic passports,
drivers licenses, citizen identification and electronic
healthcare cards. In some cases, there may also be a need to
expand the capability of electronic networks to protect or
restrict access to physical facilities for corporate employees
or government personnel. Finally, for consumers and online
merchants or banks, there is a need to authenticate credit
cardholders or bank clients for Internet-based or other
electronic transactions without jeopardizing sensitive personal
account information. In each of these areas, standards-based
devices that easily interface with a PC or network to provide
secure, controlled access to digital content or services are an
easily deployed and effective solution.
The proliferation of personal computers in both the home and
office, coupled with the increasing availability of personal
devices that enable access to computer networks and the
Internet, have created significant opportunities for electronic
transactions of all sorts, including electronic payment,
ticketing,
e-government,
electronic healthcare access and mobile banking. In government
agencies and corporate enterprises, the desire to link disparate
divisions or offices, reduce paperwork and streamline operations
is also leading to the adoption of more computer- and
network-based programs and processes. Network-based programs are
also used to track and manage data about large groups of people;
for example, citizens of a particular country. While the
benefits of computer networks may be significant, network and
Internet-based transactions also pose a significant threat of
fraud, eavesdropping and data theft for both groups and
individuals. To combat this threat, parties at both ends of the
transaction must be assured of its integrity. Online merchants
and consumers need assurance that customers are correctly
identified and that the authenticity and confidentiality of
information, such as a credit card number, is established and
maintained. Corporate, government and other networks need
security systems that safeguard the data of individuals and
protect the network from manipulation or abuse, both from within
and without the system.
Increasingly, large organizations such as corporations,
government agencies and banks are adopting systems that protect
the network, the information in it and the people using it by
authenticating each user as the user logs on and off the
network. Authentication of a users identity is typically
accomplished by one of two approaches: passwords, which are
codes known only by specific users; and tokens, which are
user-specific physical devices that only authorized users
possess. Passwords, while easier to use, are also less secure
because they tend to be short and static, and are often
transmitted without encryption. As a result, passwords are
vulnerable to decoding or observation and subsequent use by
unauthorized persons. Tokens range from simple thumb-sized
objects to more complex devices capable of generating
time-synchronized or challenge-response access codes. Certain
token-based systems require both possession of the token itself
and a personal identifier, such as a fingerprint or personal
identification number, or PIN, to indicate that the token is
being used by an authorized user. Such an approach, referred to
as two-factor authentication, provides much greater security
than single factor systems such as passwords or the simple
possession of a token.
122
One example of a token used in two-factor authentication is the
smart card, which contains an embedded microprocessor, memory
and a secure operating system. In addition to their security
capabilities, smart cards are able to store data such as account
information, healthcare records, merchant coupons, still or
video images and, in some cases, cash. Smart cards are typically
about the size of a credit card and can easily be carried in a
wallet or attached to a badge. Smaller cards designed for use
with devices such as mobile phones are also increasingly being
utilized. Depending on the application for which they are being
used, smart cards can be designed to insert into a reader
attached to a PC or other device, or can include wireless
capabilities for contactless interface. Worldwide shipments of
smart cards reached 4.2 billion in 2007 and are estimated
to grow to nearly 5.4 billion in 2008 for applications
ranging from mobile communications to corporate security to
online banking, according to the European smart card industry
organization, Eurosmart. Demand for readers used in conjunction
with those cards is also expected to grow. For example, research
firm Frost & Sullivan estimates that the worldwide
volume of smart card reader units will grow from
15.1 million in 2007 to 37.3 million in 2011. The
combination of smart cards and readers provides a secure
solution for network access, personal identification, electronic
commerce and other transactions where authentication of the user
is critical.
Market
Opportunity
The market for secure access and authentication solutions in
which SCM participates is experiencing unprecedented expansion,
fueled by a few major trends: First, there are an increasing
number of large government initiatives throughout the world,
such as the Presidential Directive on Homeland Security
(HSPD-12) in the U.S., the global mandate for
electronic passports, national identification programs
worldwide, and eHealth programs in Germany, France and other
European countries. Second, the demand for contactless devices
that operate without a physical connection between the card and
reader is also growing rapidly. Major deployments of contactless
smart cards for payment, transport and electronic identification
programs such as the upcoming German national identification
card, for example, are driving growth in the market overall and
also compelling the industry to transition from the current
environment of contact card interface to a contactless
infrastructure. Third, NFC, a wireless connectivity technology
that enables convenient short-range communications between
electronic devices, is expected to become widely used on a
global basis to enable contactless applications from mobile
phones. This will require a major upgrade of legacy
infrastructures to fully enable NFC applications such as
payment, ticketing and loyalty, and will create new markets for
contactless infrastructure and NFC tokens.
Government
Initiatives
In countries around the world, local and federal governments are
utilizing smart card technology to authenticate citizens,
employees or military personnel for programs such as network or
physical access control, national ID, healthcare, storing
digital certificates for online transactions, residency permits
and visas and drivers licenses. According to IMS Research
Group, more than one billion smart cards will be used in
identity programs by governments and other public bodies
worldwide by 2010.
To date, the largest and one of the most advanced deployments of
smart cards for digital security purposes has been the
U.S. Department of Defenses Common Access Card
(CAC) program. Beginning in October 2000, the
U.S. Department of Defense has distributed more than
17 million smart cards to military personnel and
contractors. These cards are being used as the standard
identification credential for military personnel, and are also
being used for secure authentication and network access. In
compliance with HSPD-12, since late 2006, the CAC card also has
served as a standard identity credential that is both secure and
interoperable across all federal agencies, regardless of which
agency issued the card. To satisfy the technical requirements of
HSPD-12, the National Institute for Standards and Technology
developed Federal Information Processing Standards Publication
201 a U.S. federal government standard
specifying personal identity verification requirements for
federal employees and contractors. Under these specifications,
personal identity verification cards must also include
capabilities for contactless interface with security terminals
at doorways and other entrances to provide secure physical
access at government facilities.
In order to comply with HSPD-12, government facilities are
replacing their existing access control credentials with
personal identity verification cards and their existing CAC card
readers with new FIPS 201-compliant smart card readers. The
U.S. governments decision to deploy an integrated,
agency-wide, common smart card platform
123
will continue to raise the awareness of smart card technology,
and hence increase the demand for contactless smart card
proximity readers in both public and private sectors, according
to IMS Research Group.
Internationally, countries around the world have been working
together under the auspices of the International Civil Aviation
Organization over the last several years to define and develop
standards for electronic passports based on contactless smart
card technology. The goal of the program is to ensure that these
e-passports
cannot be copied or altered, and that the biometric facial image
stored on the card could be used to positively identify the
holder. With implementations beginning in 2005, more than 50
countries worldwide now issue electronic passports, including
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, France,
Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan, Korea, Macao, Malaysia,
the Netherlands, Russia, Singapore, Sweden, the United Kingdom
and the U.S.
Countries around the world are also utilizing smart cards as
identification credentials for programs such as national
identification, residency and drivers licenses. Electronic
identification allow governments to better control the issuance
of such identification credentials while enabling cardholders to
remotely access government services. Countries utilizing
electronic national identification cards include Argentina,
Australia, Bahrain, China, Egypt, France, Germany, Hong Kong,
India, Israel, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Sweden, Thailand and
the United Kingdom. Countries issuing electronic drivers
licenses include Australia, Brazil, India, Japan, Singapore,
Sweden and the United Kingdom.
Many governments are also evaluating or making plans to develop
electronic healthcare insurance and record systems, which would
include smart card-based healthcare cards for participants.
Mexico, China, India Russia and Taiwan, as well as several
European countries, including Austria, Belgium, France, Germany,
Hungary, Italy, Poland, Turkey and the United Kingdom are among
the countries and regions that have already deployed or are
deploying electronic healthcare cards to millions of healthcare
users. These cards identify the user and store insurance and
medical information that can be accessed by doctors and
hospitals, for example. To date, one of the largest programs
under development is in Germany, where pilot tests were set up
in 2007. The German government plans to distribute
82 million new eHealth cards to citizens beginning in early
2009 and to put in place a corresponding network and card reader
infrastructure for doctors, hospitals, pharmacies and other
healthcare providers during 2009.
Growth
in the Contactless Market
With the mass deployment of electronic passport schemes on a
global basis, contactless smart chip technology has proven its
maturity and reliability when incorporated in secure documents.
As a result other sovereign documents like national ID, driver
licenses, residence permits, weapon licenses and the like are
migrating to chip-based technology. The majority of new
e-government
implementations around the world have chosen contactless
interface. Estimates from NXP Semiconductors predict that the
growth of electronic identification solutions between 2006 and
2012 will be overwhelmingly contactless (an 80% growth rate)
compared to a 37% growth rate for contact electronic
identification.
In the financial industry, major credit card companies in many
parts of the world are embracing smart card technology as a more
secure way to safeguard electronic transactions and address the
problems of fraud, identity theft and protection of privacy, the
cost of which can be significant. The majority of credit cards
issued worldwide now comply with the Europay Mastercard Visa
standard for securing financial transactions using a smart card.
Along with the move to more secure chip-based payment cards,
there is an increasing preference for the convenience of
contactless systems to facilitate payments. In part, this is
being fueled by a desire on the part of consumers to replace
cash payments with electronic payments in a number of daily
transactions, particularly those of small value. Over the last
two years, electronic payment programs featuring cards equipped
with contactless technology, such as such as
Visa®
payWavetm
and
MasterCard®
PayPasstm,
have become widespread in Europe and Asia and are expected to
generate significant demand worldwide for smart cards and
related technology going forward.
Contactless transactions are being made even more convenient
with the emergence of mobile phones as a logical and leading
platform to enable secure electronic payments. With smart
device capabilities, the mobile phone enables consumers to
purchase goods and services electronically and conveniently,
while ensuring security
124
through individual authentication of the user. In effect, the
mobile phone becomes an electronic wallet. Integration of
contactless payment technology into mobile phones is expected to
further spur demand for contactless technology over the next
several years. According to the research firm Gartner Group, the
number of consumers using mobile payment services via mobile
phones and other devices is expected to grow from
32.9 million users in 2008 to 103.9 million in 2011.
There is significant long-term opportunity for companies that
can provide contactless solutions that enable mobile phones and
other personal devices to support secure electronic payment and
banking transactions.
Major contactless technology standards include ISO14443 A and B,
MIFAREtm,
FeliCa®.
In Japan, the contactless technology standard known as
FeliCa®
is widely used for applications such as payment, transport,
loyalty and mobile communications. Developed by Sony, FeliCa is
the most mature contactless technology in the world today.
Growth in FeliCa-enabled devices both within and beyond Japan is
expected to be significant over the next several years. ABI
Research predicts that reader units will grow from
2.3 million units in 2006 to 25 million units in 2012,
an average annual growth rate of 49%.
Growth
in Near Field Communication Market
As noted above, mobile phones are emerging as the preferred
platform to enable contactless applications, in particular
secure electronic payments. NFC is fast becoming the preferred
technology to enable secure short-range wireless connectivity
for mobile phones and other personal mobile devices. Based on
the 13.56 Mhz frequency, NFC is a wireless connectivity
technology with a short-range of one to four inches. An NFC
device can communicate with both existing ISO 14443 smart cards
and readers, as well as with other NFC devices, and is thereby
compatible with existing contactless infrastructures already in
use for public transportation and payment. According to ABI
Research, the volume of NFC-enabled devices will grow from zero
units in 2005 to 419 million units in 2012, and average
annual growth rate of 161%.
Smart
USB Tokens
As a result of the major trends driving growth in secure access
and authentication solutions described above, there is
complementary and growing demand for small, portable tokens that
bridge the gap between NFC-enabled mobile phones and a notebook
or desktop PC. Smart USB tokens combine mobility with the ease
of a USB interface to PCs and other computing devices and the
capability to accept a smart card in either standard size or the
smaller SIM card format. Such tokens secure authentication for
applications including banking, payment, access control, and
data storage. According to the research firm Eurosmart, the
worldwide demand for smart USB tokens could reach
93 million units by 2012.
SCMs
Secure Authentication Products
SCM offers a full range of smart card reader technology
solutions to address the need for smart card-based security for
a range of applications and environments, including PCs,
networks, physical facilities and authentication programs.
SCMs products include both contact and contactless smart
card readers and terminals, USB tokens, ASICs and small office
productivity packages based on smart cards, sold under the
CHIPDRIVE brand. SCM sells its readers and terminals, tokens and
ASICs primarily to PC OEMs, smart card solutions providers and
government systems integrators to support specific programs,
such as
e-health
cards, secure mobile banking or the U.S. government
personal identity verification program; as well as to OEMs that
incorporate SCMs products into their devices, such as PCs
or keyboards. SCM sells its CHIPDRIVE small office productivity
packages primarily to end users via retail channels and the
Internet.
Smart
Card Readers
SCM is one of the worlds leading suppliers of smart card
readers for security-oriented applications. SCMs smart
card readers are hardware devices that connect either externally
or internally with a computer or other processing platform to
verify the identity of, or authenticate, the user, and thus
control access. Much like a lock works with a key, SCMs
readers work with a smart card to admit or deny access to a
computer or network, or to authenticate the card holder for
identification and access to facilities, programs or services.
CMs readers offer
125
incremental levels of protection against unauthorized use, from
simple PC Card reader devices to more complex PIN entry systems,
which require both a smart card and a users personal
identification number to authenticate the user. SCMs
readers are used to authenticate users in order to support
security programs and applications for corporations, financial
institutions, governments and individuals. These security
programs and applications include secure network logon; personal
identification for programs such as healthcare delivery,
drivers licenses and electronic passports; secure mobile
banking; digital signatures; and secure
e-commerce.
SCMs reader devices employ an open-systems architecture
that provides compatibility across a range of hardware platforms
and software environments and accommodates remote upgrades so
that compatibility can be maintained as the security
infrastructure evolves. SCM has made significant investments in
software embedded within its products to enable its smart card
readers and components to read the majority of smart cards in
the world, regardless of manufacturer or application. SCMs
smart card readers are also available with a variety of
interfaces, including biometric (fingerprint),
wireless/contactless, keypad, USB, PCMCIA,
ExpressCard®
and serial port, and offer various combinations of interfaces
integrated into one device in order to further increase the
level of security.
SCMs smart card reader product line includes:
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Smart Card Readers/Writers: include
internal and external Secure Card Readers that require only a
smart card to provide secure authentication and external Secure
PINpad Readers with a numeric PINpad that utilize a smart card
in conjunction with a personal identification code to ensure
two factor authentication of the user.
|
|
|
|
Contactless Readers and Dual Interface
Readers: internal and external readers that
address the demand for contactless interface used in many
security programs based on smart cards, for example public
transport,
e-banking
and
e-passport
personalization and verification. SCM is currently working on
adding NFC and FeliCa functionality to its entire range of dual
interface and contactless solutions.
|
|
|
|
Physical Access Control Terminal: designed to
address the requirements of the U.S. government for secure
access to facilities. The physical access control terminal
combines new technologies such as contactless and biometric
interface with existing control systems as well as CAC and newer
personal identity verification credential cards, to provide
support for new connectivity options going forward.
|
|
|
|
eHealth Terminal: specifically designed to
meet the requirements of the German Health Card, to support
Germanys intended rollout of healthcare cards to
82 million citizens. The eHealth100 terminal reads and
operates both with Germanys current memory card-based
health card as well as the new chip-based card, and is compliant
for use with three different card types: the electronic health
card, the health professional card, and the Secure Module Cards
used for secure data communication.
|
|
|
|
ePassport Readers: designed to read all
electronic passports currently in use or planned for
distribution. Ranked among the highest in interoperability and
versatility in international interoperability tests. SCM offers
both complete ePassport readers and ePassport modules that can
be incorporated into customer terminals and designs.
|
|
|
|
Mobile Readers: unconnected devices that
enable secure network access and user authentication by
generating one-time passwords.
|
|
|
|
Keyboard Readers: reader interfaces that are
designed to be embedded into a computer keyboard at the
manufacturer.
|
SCMs smart card readers are developed in compliance with
relevant industry standards related to the applications for
which they will be used, including PC/SC, Europay Mastercard
Visa, FINREAD and Common Criteria. For example, many of
SCMs readers, including the SCRx31 Secure Card Reader
line, conform to Europay Mastercard Visa international standards
for financial transactions. SCM typically customizes its smart
card readers with unique casing designs and configurations to
address the specific requirements of each customer.
126
Smart USB
Tokens
SCMs @MAXX family of personal contactless tokens is
designed to securely support a broad range of applications. When
connected to a PC, the tokens support the establishment of a
secure channel to content and services available on the PC or a
remote system. Unplugged, they fully leverage existing
contactless infrastructures by enabling multiple services and
applications such as contactless payment, contactless public
transport ticketing or access to facilities. A planned NFC
version of the @MAXX token is designed to enable legacy
infrastructures (such as PCs or point of sales terminals) to
become NFC enabled devices and, for example, enable smart phones
that are not equipped with NFC to become NFC-enabled mobile
devices, provided there is a USB connection.
ASICs/Chip
Sets
SCMs ASICs provide smart card interface capabilities for
embedded platforms, such as desktop computers or keyboards. SCM
offers two levels of ASICs to provide both basic smart card
interface capability and support for multiple interfaces and
reader devices. All of SCMs ASICs comply with all relevant
security standards for applications in the smart card industry.
In addition, SCMs advanced chip allows on-board flash
upgrades for future firmware and application enhancements. SCM
has a unique position in the market, with the ability to offer
dedicated smart reader/writer, single chip solutions with
embedded FLASH for secure firmware upgrade in the field (to
prevent obsolescence) for its own products as well as to be
integrated in PCs, keyboards and other devices.
CHIPDRIVE
Productivity Solutions
SCM offers several CHIPDRIVE packages, consisting of smart
cards, readers and software applications, for small and
medium-sized businesses. These products support applications
such as smart card-enabled logon to
Microsoft®
Windows®
and smart card-based, secure electronic time recording.
Digital
Media Reader and Connectivity Market
Digital cameras have rapidly saturated the consumer market over
the last few years, with 80% of U.S. households predicted
to own a digital camera by 2010, according to Gartner Group.
Camera phones have also gained rapid popularity; in fact, 15% of
consumers declare their phones to be their primary
picture-taking device, according to an October 2007 survey from
InfoTrends. InfoTrends estimates that U.S. output of
digital photo prints will grow from 13.2 billion prints in
2005 to 16 billion by 2009. Digital flash media cards,
which store digital images on the majority of digital cameras
and some camera phones, are the key driver behind digital print
growth. Higher capacity memory cards allow digital camera users
to take more pictures before having to download images or swap
out the card. As card capacities increase, more time is needed
to download images. This uses more of the cameras battery
life, which already may be insufficient for many camera owners.
To print without draining the camera battery, the digital flash
media card can be removed and inserted into a card
reader on a PC, printer or kiosk to
download and print images.
Retail photo kiosks and minilabs, which give instant,
high-quality printouts of digital images, make printing photos
more convenient for the consumer and typically provide higher
quality prints than home printers. According to a December 2007
survey conducted by InfoTrends, 49% of digital camera owners who
print photos had obtained prints at a retail location in 2007,
and the number is expected to grow. As flash memory card
capacities increase and digital cameras continue to proliferate,
SCM believes consumers will increasingly use photo kiosks and
minilabs to download and print their digital pictures. Each
photo kiosk or minilab requires a variety of media card readers
to download images from the various media cards in use in
digital cameras on the market.
SCMs
Digital Media and Connectivity Products
SCM offers digital media readers that provide an interface to
the various formats of digital media cards to download digital
images and other content. SCM sells its digital media readers
primarily to photo kiosk manufacturers. SCMs digital media
readers allow photo kiosk makers and others to build digital
flash media interface capabilities into their products and
provide interface capabilities for all major memory card
formats, including PCMCIA I and II,
CompactFlash®
I and II,
MultiMediaCardtm,
Secure Digital
Card®,
SmartMediatm,
127
Sony Memory
Stick®
and xD-Picture
Cardtm.
SCMs digital media readers leverage its interface chips to
enable each reader slot to read multiple types of cards.
SCMs digital media reader product line includes:
|
|
|
|
|
Preconfigured Drives: SCMs 3.5 inch
5- and 6-bay drives provide
plug-and-play
interface for photo kiosks and mini labs. Marketed as
Professional Card Drive (PCD) or Modular (gMOD and PCD-zMOD)
readers, these drives are designed to support heavy commercial
usage and support multiple media card formats in either an
integrated or a modular form factor.
|
|
|
|
Single Board Drives: SCMs single board
drives provide flexible interface solutions for print kiosks,
photo labs and other applications requiring digital flash media
interface. Single board drives can be configured using any
combination of media interface and drive placement to address
the specific requirements of each kiosk or other product
environment.
|
Technology
Most of the markets in which SCM participates are in their early
stages of development and it is expected that they will continue
to evolve. For example, early markets such as ours typically
require complete hardware solutions, but over time requirements
shift to critical components such as silicon or software as OEM
customers increase their knowledge and sales volumes of the
technologies being provided. SCM is committed to developing
products using standards compliant technologies. SCMs core
technologies, listed below, leverage its development efforts to
benefit customers across SCMs product lines and markets.
Silicon
Strategy
SCM has implemented a number of core interface and processing
technologies into its silicon chips. SCM has also selected what
it believes are the best available silicon from outside
suppliers based on desired functionality and has embedded its
core interface and processing technologies in order to meet
time-to-market requirements. SCM expects to continue to maintain
a balance between its silicon and the use of third party devices.
Firmware
and Drivers
For its Secure Authentication products, including contact and
contactless readers, SCM has developed interface technology that
provides interoperability between PCs and smart cards from many
different smart card manufacturers and with many different
operating systems. SCMs interoperable architecture
includes an International Standards Organization-compliant layer
as well as an additional layer for supporting non-International
Standard Organization-compliant smart cards. Through its
proprietary integrated circuits and firmware, SCMs smart
card readers can be updated electronically to accommodate new
types of smart cards without the need to change the
readers hardware. For its Digital Media and Connectivity
products, SCM has developed interface technology that provides
interoperability and compatibility between various digital
appliances, computer platforms and flash memory cards. For
complex terminals for electronic healthcare and other markets,
SCM has chosen to use
Linux®-based
embedded firmware, which helps to provide the base layers for
writing higher levels of application software. All SCMs
products are offered with the necessary device drivers for major
operating systems, including Microsoft Windows, Windows
Vistatm,
Linux and MAC
OS®.
Complete
Hardware Solutions
SCM provides complete hardware solutions for a range of secure
digital access applications, and SCM can customize these
solutions in terms of physical design and product feature set to
accommodate the specific requirements of each customer. For
example, SCM has designed and manufactured smart card readers
that incorporate specific features, such as a transparent case
and removable USB cable, to address the needs of specific OEM
customers.
Customers
SCMs products are targeted at government contractors and
systems integrators, as well as manufacturers of computers,
computer components, consumer electronics and photo processing
equipment. Sales to a relatively
128
small number of customers historically have accounted for a
significant percentage of SCMs total sales. Sales to
SCMs top ten customers accounted for approximately 56% of
revenue in the first nine months of 2008, 61% of revenue in
fiscal year 2007 and 53% of revenue in fiscal year 2006. In
2007, Envoy Data Corporation accounted for more than 10% of
SCMs revenue. In 2006, Solectron accounted for more than
10% of SCMs revenue. In 2005, IBM and Shin Shin Co. Ltd.
each accounted for more than 10% of SCMs revenue. SCM
expects that sales of its products to a limited number of
customers will continue to account for a high percentage of its
total sales for the foreseeable future. The loss or reduction of
orders from a significant customer, including losses or
reductions due to manufacturing, reliability or other
difficulties associated with SCMs products, changes in
customer buying patterns, or market, economic or competitive
conditions in the digital information security business, could
harm SCMs business and operating results.
Sales and
Marketing
SCM utilizes a direct sales and marketing organization,
supplemented by distributors, value added resellers, systems
integrators, resellers and Internet sales. As of
September 30, 2008, SCM had 39 full-time employees
engaged in sales and marketing activities. SCMs direct
sales staff solicits prospective customers, provides technical
advice and support with respect to its products and works
closely with customers, distributors and OEMs. In support of its
sales efforts, SCM conducts sales training courses, targeted
marketing programs and advertising, and ongoing customer and
third party communications programs, and it participates in
trade shows.
Backlog
SCM typically does not maintain a significant level of backlog.
As a result, revenue in any quarter depends on contracts entered
into or orders booked and shipped in that quarter. Sales are
made primarily pursuant to purchase orders for current delivery
or agreements covering purchases over a period of time.
SCMs customer contracts generally do not require fixed
long-term purchase commitments. In view of its order and
shipment patterns, and because of the possibility of customer
changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders, SCM
does not believe that such agreements provide meaningful backlog
figures or are necessarily indicative of actual sales for any
succeeding period.
Collaborative
Industry Relationships
SCM is a contributor in various national and global
standardization bodies and industry consortia, and is party to
collaborative arrangements with a number of third parties. SCM
evaluates, on an ongoing basis, potential strategic alliances
and intend to continue to pursue such relationships. SCMs
future success will depend in part on the success of its current
arrangements and its ability to establish additional
arrangements. These arrangements may not result in commercially
successful products.
DIN
SCM is a member of DIN, the German Institute for
Standardization, which develops norms and standards as a service
to industry, the state and society as a whole. A registered
non-profit association, DIN has been based in Berlin since 1917.
DINs primary task is to work closely with its stakeholders
to develop consensus-based standards that meet market
requirements. Some 26,000 experts contribute their skills and
experience to the standardization process. By agreement with the
German federal government, DIN is the acknowledged national
standards body that represents German interests in European and
international standards organizations. 90% of the standards work
now carried out by DIN is international in nature.
NETC@RDS
SCM is a member of the NETC@RDS initiative, which is devoted to
establishing improved health care access and administration
procedures for mobile citizens across the European Union (EU),
using the electronic European Health Insurance Card. SCM is a
technology provider to the NETC@RDS project and has participated
in market validation tests which included 85 pilot sites in 10
EU member states.
129
NFC
Forum
SCM is a principal member of the NFC Forum and was recently
named chair of the NFC Forums Devices Working Group. The
NFC Forum is a non-profit industry association whose mission is
to advance the use of NFC technology by developing
specifications, ensuring interoperability among devices and
services, and educating the market about NFC technology. NFC is
a type of radio frequency technology that allows for secure
transference of data between a card and reader over distances of
not more than a few inches, and is an important technology for
contactless payment applications. The NFC Forum consists of 150+
global member companies, including leading mobile
communications, semiconductor and consumer electronics firms.
NFC Forum members are currently developing specifications for a
modular NFC device architecture, protocols for interoperable
data exchange and device-independent service delivery, device
discovery, and device capability.
PCMCIA
SCM is a member of the Personal Computer Memory Card
International Association, or PCMCIA, an international standards
body and trade association with more than 100 member companies.
SCM has been a member of PCMCIA since 1990. PCMCIA was founded
in 1989 to establish standards for integrated circuit cards and
to promote interchangeability among mobile PCs.
PC/SC
Workgroup
SCM is an associate member of the PC/SC workgroup, a consortium
of technology companies that seeks to set the standard for
integrating smart cards and smart card readers into the
mainstream computing environment.
Share
Security Formats Cooperation (SSFC)
SCM is a customer partner of SSFC, an alliance of leading
Japanese technology companies that aims to establish a securely
shared new data format for contactless smart cards, enabling
multiple security applications to be managed using a single
smart card.
Silicon
Trust
SCM is a member of Silicon Trust, an industry forum sponsored by
Infineon Technologies that focuses on silicon based security
solutions, including smart cards, biometrics, and trusted
platforms.
Smart
Card Alliance
SCM is a member of the Smart Card Alliance, a
U.S.-based,
multi-industry association of member firms working to accelerate
the widespread acceptance of multiple applications for smart
card technology. SCM is also a member of Smart Card
Alliances Leadership Council.
Teletrust
SCM is a member of Teletrust, a German organization whose goal
is to provide a legally accepted means to adopt digital
signatures. Digital signatures are encrypted personal
identifiers, typically stored on a secure smart card, which
allow for a high level of security through internationally
accepted authentication methods. SCM is also a member of the
smart card terminal committee of Teletrust, which defines the
standards for connecting smart cards to computers for
applications such as secure electronic commerce over the
Internet.
Other
SCM is also a member of several digital flash media card
organizations, including CompactFlash Association, Memory Stick
Developers Forum, MultiMediaCard Association, SD Card
Association, SSFDC SmartMedia Forum, xD-Picture Card Forum,
Photo Marketing Association International and USB Implementers
Forum.
130
Research
and Development
To date, SCM has made substantial investments in research and
development, particularly in the areas of smart card-based
physical and network access devices and digital connectivity and
interface devices. SCMs engineering design teams work
cross-functionally with marketing managers, applications
engineers and customers to develop products and product
enhancements to meet customer and market requirements. SCM also
strives to develop and maintain close relationships with key
suppliers of components and technologies in order to be able to
quickly introduce new products that incorporate the latest
technological advances. SCMs future success will depend
upon its ability to develop and to introduce new products that
keep pace with technological developments and emerging industry
standards while addressing the increasingly sophisticated needs
of its customers.
SCM focuses the bulk of its research and development activities
on the development of products for new and emerging market
opportunities. Research and development expenses were
approximately $3.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, $3.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and $3.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. As of September 30, 2008, SCM had
73 full-time employees engaged in research and development
activities, including software and hardware engineering, testing
and quality assurance and technical documentation. The majority
of SCMs research and development activities occur in India.
Manufacturing
and Sources of Supply
SCM utilizes the services of contract manufacturers in Singapore
and China to manufacture its products and components. SCM has
implemented a global sourcing strategy that it believes enables
the company to achieve economies of scale and uniform quality
standards for its products, and to support gross margins. In the
event any of SCMs contract manufacturers are unable or
unwilling to continue to manufacture its products, SCM may have
to rely on other current manufacturing sources or identify and
qualify new contract manufacturers. Any significant delay in
SCMs ability to obtain adequate supplies of its products
from current or alternative sources would harm its business and
operating results.
SCM believes that its success will depend in large part on its
ability to provide quality products and services while ensuring
the highest level of security for its products during the
manufacturing process. SCM has a formal quality control program
to satisfy its customers requirements for high quality and
reliable products. To ensure that products manufactured by
others are consistent with its standards, SCM manages all key
aspects of the production process, including establishing
product specifications, selecting the components to be used to
produce its products, selecting the suppliers of these
components and negotiating the prices for certain of these
components. In addition, SCM works with its suppliers to improve
process control and product design. As of September 30,
2008, SCM had nine full-time employees engaged in manufacturing
and logistics activities, focused on coordinating product
management and supply chain activities between SCM and its
contract manufacturers.
Over the past several months, SCM has added alternative sources
for both its products and components. Even so, SCM relies upon a
limited number of suppliers for some key components of its
products. For example, SCM currently utilizes the foundry
services of external suppliers to produce its ASICs for smart
cards readers, and it uses chips and antenna components from
third party supplier in its contactless smart card readers.
Wherever possible, SCM has added additional sources of supply
for mechanical components such as printed circuit boards or
casing. However, a risk remains that SCM may be adversely
impacted by an inadequate supply of components, price increases,
late deliveries or poor component quality. In addition, some of
the basic components SCM uses in its products, such as digital
flash media, may at any time be in great demand. This can result
in the components not being available in a timely fashion or at
all, particularly if larger companies have ordered more
significant volumes of the components; or in higher prices being
charged for the components. Disruption or termination of the
supply of components or software used in SCMs products
could delay shipments of its products, which could have a
material adverse effect on its business and operating results.
These delays could also damage relationships with current and
prospective customers.
Competition
The Secure Authentication and Digital Media and Connectivity
markets are competitive and characterized by rapidly changing
technology. SCM believes that competition in these markets is
likely to intensify as a result of
131
anticipated increased demand for digital access products. SCM
currently experience competition from a number of sources,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Card Systems, Gemalto (formerly Gemplus and Axalto),
O2Micro and OmniKey in smart card readers, ASICs and universal
smart card reader interfaces for PC and network access;
|
|
|
|
AMAG Technology, Bioscrypt, BridgePoint Systems, HID, Integrated
Engineering, Precise Biometrics, XceedID and XTec in physical
access control terminals; and
|
|
|
|
Atech, Datafab, OnSpec and YE Data for digital media readers.
|
SCM also experiences indirect competition from certain of its
customers who currently offer alternative products or are
expected to introduce competitive products in the future. SCM
may in the future face competition from these and other parties
that develop digital data security products based upon
approaches similar to or different from those employed by SCM.
In addition, the market for secure authentication and digital
media transfer products may ultimately be dominated by
approaches other than the approach marketed by SCM. SCM believes
that the principal competitive factors affecting the market for
its products include:
|
|
|
|
|
the extent to which products must support industry standards and
provide interoperability;
|
|
|
|
the extent to which standards are widely adopted and product
interoperability is required within industry segments;
|
|
|
|
technical features;
|
|
|
|
quality and reliability;
|
|
|
|
the ability of suppliers to develop new products quickly to
satisfy new market and customer requirements;
|
|
|
|
ease of use;
|
|
|
|
strength of distribution channels; and
|
|
|
|
price.
|
While SCM believes that it competes favorably with respect to
these factors, it may not be able to continue to successfully
compete due to these or other factors and competitive pressures
it faces could materially and adversely affect its business and
operating results.
Proprietary
Technology and Intellectual Property
SCMs success depends significantly upon its proprietary
technology. SCM currently relies on a combination of patent,
copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality
agreements and contractual provisions to protect its proprietary
rights, which afford only limited protection. Although SCM often
seek to protect its proprietary technology through patents, it
is possible that no new patents will be issued, that SCMs
proprietary products or technologies are not patentable, and
that any issued patent will fail to provide SCM with any
competitive advantages.
There has been a great deal of litigation in the technology
industry regarding intellectual property rights and from time to
time SCM may be required to use litigation to protect its
proprietary technology. This may result in SCM incurring
substantial costs and there is no assurance that SCM would be
successful in any such litigation. Despite SCMs efforts to
protect its proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt
to copy aspects of SCMs products or to use its proprietary
information and software without authorization. In addition, the
laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary and
intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws
of the United States. Because many of SCMs products are
sold and a substantial portion of its business is conducted
outside the United States, SCMs exposure to intellectual
property risks may be higher. SCMs means of protecting its
proprietary and intellectual property rights may not be
adequate. There is a risk that SCMs competitors will
independently develop similar technology, duplicate its products
or design around patents or other intellectual property rights.
If SCM is unsuccessful in protecting its intellectual property
or its products or technologies are duplicated by others, its
business could be harmed.
132
In addition, SCM has from time to time received claims that it
is infringing upon third parties intellectual property
rights. Future disputes with third parties may arise and these
disputes may not be resolved on terms acceptable to SCM. As the
number of products and competitors in SCMs target markets
grow, the likelihood of infringement claims also increases. Any
claims or litigation may be time-consuming and costly, divert
management resources, cause product shipment delays, or require
SCM to redesign its products, accept product returns or to write
off inventory. Any of these events could have a material adverse
effect on SCMs business and operating results.
SCM owns approximately 40 patent families (designs, patents and
utility models) comprising a total of 120 individual or
regional filings, covering products, mechanical designs and
ideas for SCMs Secure Authentication and Digital Media and
Connectivity businesses. Additionally, SCM leverages its own
ASIC designs for smart card interface in its reader devices.
None of SCMs patents are material to its business.
Employees
As of September 30, 2008, SCM had 151 full-time
employees, of which 73 were engaged in engineering, research and
development; 39 were engaged in sales and marketing; nine were
engaged in manufacturing and logistics; and 30 were engaged in
general management and administration. SCM is not subject to any
collective bargaining agreements and, to its knowledge, none of
its employees are currently represented by a labor union. To
date, SCM has experienced no work stoppages and believes that
its employee relations are generally good.
Foreign
Operations; Properties
SCMs corporate headquarters are in Ismaning, Germany. SCM
also leases small sales and marketing facilities in California,
Japan and Hong Kong. Research and development activities are
conducted from SCMs facility in Chennai, India. SCM
considers these properties as adequate for its business needs.
Legal
Proceedings
SCM is not currently a party to any pending legal proceeding,
nor is SCMs property the subject of any pending legal
proceeding, that is not in the ordinary course of business or
otherwise material to the financial condition of the SCMs
business. From time to time, SCM could become subject to claims
arising in the ordinary course of business or could be a
defendant in lawsuits. While the outcome of such claims or other
proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, SCMs
management expects that any such liabilities, to the extent not
provided for by insurance or otherwise, will not have a material
adverse effect on SCMs financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
133
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of SCMs financial
condition and results of operations should be read together with
Selected Historical and Pro Forma Combined Financial
Data Selected Historical Financial Data of SCM
and the SCM financial statements and related notes as well as
the risk factors set forth under the caption Risks
Relating to SCMs Business appearing elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus.
The historical financial data for SCM is based on the unaudited
consolidated financial statements as of and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, as well as the audited
consolidated financial statements of SCM as of and for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The consolidated
financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(US GAAP).
Overview
SCM was founded in 1990 and was incorporated in 1996 under the
laws of the state of Delaware. SCM designs, develops and sells
hardware, software and silicon solutions that enable people to
conveniently and securely access digital content and services.
SCM sells its secure digital access products into two market
segments: Secure Authentication and Digital Media and
Connectivity:
|
|
|
|
|
For the Secure Authentication market, SCM offers smart card
reader technology that enables authentication of individuals for
applications such as electronic passports and drivers
licenses, electronic healthcare cards, secure logical access to
PCs and networks, and physical access to facilities. Within the
Secure Authentication segment, SCM also offers a line of smart
card solutions under the CHIPDRIVE brand that include
productivity applications such as time recording and attendance,
physical access and password management for small and medium
sized enterprises.
|
|
|
|
For the Digital Media and Connectivity market, SCM offers
digital media readers that are used to transfer digital content
to and from various flash media. These readers are primarily
used in digital photo kiosks.
|
SCM sells its Secure Authentication products primarily to OEMs,
who typically either bundle SCMs products with their own
solutions, or repackage SCMs products for resale to their
customers. SCMs OEM customers typically sell SCMs
smart card readers to government contractors, systems
integrators, large enterprises and computer manufacturers, as
well as banks and other financial institutions. SCM sells its
digital media readers primarily to computer and photo processing
equipment manufacturers. SCM sells and licenses its products
through a direct sales and marketing organization, as well as
through distributors, value added resellers and systems
integrators worldwide.
On May 22, 2006, SCM completed the sale of its Digital
Television solutions (DTV solutions) business to
Kudelski S.A. As a result, SCM has accounted for the DTV
solutions business as a discontinued operation, and the
statements of operations and cash flows for all periods
presented reflect the discontinuance of this business. In
addition, SCMs operations previously included a retail
Digital Media and Video business, which was sold in the third
quarter of 2003. As a result of this sale and divestiture,
beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2003, SCM has
accounted for the retail Digital Media and Video business as a
discontinued operation, and statements of operations for all
periods presented reflect the discontinuance of this business.
Growth
Strategies
SCM has put in place a number of strategies to grow revenues
over the long-term, as discussed below.
Throughout most of 2007, SCMs revenue growth strategy was
primarily based on investing in new Secure Authentication
products to address emerging smart card-based security programs
in Europe, including
e-passport,
national identification and
e-health.
Additionally, SCM implemented programs to expand sales of its
CHIPDRIVE business productivity solutions for small and
medium-sized businesses to markets outside Germany. SCM also
continued its traditional focus on the U.S. government
market, providing smart card readers for authentication programs
within various federal agencies, as well as providing digital
media readers for the photo kiosk market in the U.S.
134
In late 2007, SCM began to implement a new growth strategy that
aims to expand sales of existing product lines into new
geographic markets and to diversify and expand its customer
base. As part of this strategy, SCM added sales resources in
Europe, Asia and the Americas to increase its ability to address
current and future business opportunities. For example, sales
resources were added targeting authentication programs in the
government and enterprise sectors in Latin America and Asia and
SCM began targeting the photo kiosk markets in Europe and Asia.
As sales cycles for government projects and design cycles for
photo kiosks may take several quarters, SCM expects to begin to
realize revenue from these investments in the first half of 2009.
In early 2008, SCM implemented an additional growth strategy
aimed at further diversifying and expanding its customer base by
targeting the emerging contactless reader market. SCM has begun
investing to develop new Secure Authentication products based on
contactless technologies such as Near Field Communication and
FeliCa®
and has initiated business development activities aimed at
penetrating the worldwide financial services and enterprise
markets with its contactless reader products. For example, in
October 2008, SCM introduced the first in a family of new
products called
@MAXXtm
that are aimed at the market for contactless applications.
To better leverage its capabilities, SCM has also adopted a more
active approach to partnering with other companies that can
provide complementary resources and strengths. For example, in
mid-2008, SCM worked together with XIRING, a French security
solutions company, to develop a mobile eHealth terminal for the
German electronic health card system. In October 2008, SCM
announced it had acquired an equity position in TranZfinity, a
company with which SCM developed its @MAXX family of contactless
readers, and that has agreed to provide application services for
those readers. Additionally, in October 2008, SCM announced a
distribution agreement with Hirsch, as a supplier of physical
access control systems, to sell SCMs physical access
control terminals into Hirschs customer base in the
U.S. government.
During 2007, SCM continued to operate its business based on the
reduced expense levels achieved in the fourth quarter of 2006.
SCM had taken several actions during 2006 to lower operating
expenses, including outsourcing manufacturing, moving corporate
financial and compliance functions from the U.S. to
Germany, consolidating offices and reducing headcount. During
2006, SCM also put in place product cost reduction programs that
resulted in ongoing product margin improvements from the fourth
quarter of 2006 through 2007.
To ensure it has the expertise and executive leadership to
manage and grow its business, during 2007 and 2008, SCM has
reorganized and strengthened its management team with key
executive hires: Felix Marx joined as Chief Executive Officer in
October 2007; and Dr. Manfred Mueller was promoted to
Executive Vice President, Strategic Sales and Business
Development in March 2008. In the first nine months of 2008, SCM
also has added expertise in contactless technologies and the
contactless market with the addition of new sales, marketing and
engineering professionals from the contactless industry. SCM
believes its new executives and the expanded expertise of its
management team strengthen its ability to anticipate and respond
to market trends both in the traditional smart card industry and
in the emerging market for contactless solutions.
SCM has invested in new products, resources and programs to
support the growth strategies described above and this has
resulted in increased operating expenses year over year. SCM
believes these investments are critical to the success of its
growth strategies and expects to continue to invest in these
strategies in the future.
Trends in
SCMs Business
In its continuing operations, SCM may experience significant
variations in demand for its products quarter to quarter. This
is particularly true for SCMs Secure Authentication
products, a significant proportion of which are currently sold
for smart card-based identification programs run by various
U.S., European and Asian governments. Sales of SCMs smart
card readers and chips for government programs are impacted by
testing and compliance schedules of government bodies, as well
as roll-out schedules for application deployments, both of which
contribute to variability in demand from quarter to quarter.
Historically, SCM has sold a significant proportion of its
Secure Authentication products to the U.S. government for
PC and network access by military and federal employees, and
these sales have been an important component of SCMs
overall revenue. However, during the first six months of 2008,
SCM experienced significantly weaker demand for its smart card
readers from the U.S. government sector due to project and
budget delays. Sales to
135
the U.S. government market increased in the third quarter
of 2008, returning to levels similar to those SCM had
experienced in 2007, as some projects moved forward. During the
past several quarters, SCM has also experienced an ongoing shift
in the U.S. government market away from external reader
devices and toward interface chips that provide embedded reader
technology in laptops and keyboards. SCM has sold high volumes
of smart card interface chips for embedded readers to laptop and
keyboard manufacturers in Asia during this period that have
partially offset the decrease in sales of its external readers;
however these chips have a lower average selling price than
SCMs external reader devices. SCMs sales to Asia
increased 21% in the third quarter of 2008 and 17% in the first
nine months of 2008 compared with the prior year. SCM continues
to believe that it remains a leading supplier of smart card
reader technology to the U.S. government market and that
the company is not losing share to competitors. However, the
shift in demand from external reader devices towards embedded
readers in the U.S. government market has resulted and is
likely to continue to result in reduced revenue opportunity for
SCM.
In the third quarter of 2008, European sales decreased
approximately 20% compared with the prior year quarter due to
variability in the timing of orders for regional programs
requiring smart card readers. SCM continues to expect that the
rollout of the new electronic health card in Germany will
provide significant additional opportunity. Currently, SCM is
one of a limited number of suppliers certified to provide
eHealth card terminals approved for this program. However, the
timing of the programs launch is still uncertain.
Sales of SCMs Digital Media and Connectivity products are
less subject to variability based on market or project demands;
however, SCM is dependent on a small number of customers
in both of its primary product segments, which can result in
fluctuations in sales levels from one period to another. During
the third quarter of 2008, digital media reader sales were well
below recent quarterly levels due to unexpectedly light orders
from a major customer.
Both SCMs Secure Authentication and Digital Media and
Connectivity businesses are subject to ongoing pricing pressure.
To counter this trend, SCM has implemented ongoing cost
reduction programs that have resulted in ongoing improvements to
its product margins. SCM believes it should be able to offset
pricing pressure and material cost increases with ongoing
improvements in its supply chain systems.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
SCMs Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses the
companys consolidated financial statements, which have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The
preparation of these financial statements requires SCMs
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis,
management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including
those related to product returns, customer incentives, bad
debts, inventories, asset impairment, deferred tax assets,
accrued warranty reserves, restructuring costs, contingencies
and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on
historical experience and on various other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Management believes the following critical accounting policies,
among others, affect its more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of SCMs consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
SCM recognizes product revenue upon shipment provided that risk
and title have transferred, a purchase order has been received,
collection is determined to be reasonably assured and no
significant obligations remain. Maintenance revenue is deferred
and amortized over the period of the maintenance contract.
Provisions for estimated warranty repairs and returns and
allowances are provided for at the time products are shipped.
SCM maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of customers to make
required payments. If the financial condition of SCMs
customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of
their ability to make payments, additional allowances might be
required, which could have a material impact on SCMs
results of operations.
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
SCM typically plans its production and inventory levels based on
internal forecasts of customer demand, which is highly
unpredictable and can fluctuate substantially. SCM regularly
reviews inventory quantities on hand and records an estimated
provision for excess inventory, technical obsolescence and no
sale-ability based primarily on its historical sales and
expectations for future use. Actual demand and market conditions
may be different from those projected by SCMs management.
This could have a material effect on SCMs operating
results and financial position. If SCM was to make different
judgments or utilize different estimates, the amount and timing
of its write-down of inventories could be materially different.
Excess inventory frequently remains saleable. When excess
inventory is sold, it yields a gross profit margin of up to
100%. Sales of excess inventory have the effect of increasing
the gross profit margin beyond that which would otherwise occur,
because of previous write-downs. Once SCM has written down
inventory below cost, it does not subsequently write it up.
|
|
|
|
SCM adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Boards
(FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting For
Uncertain Tax Positions (FIN 48) in the
first quarter of 2007. SCM is required to make certain judgments
and estimates in determining income tax expense for financial
statement purposes. Significant changes to these estimates may
result in an increase or decrease to SCMs tax provision in
a subsequent period. The calculation of SCMs tax
liabilities requires dealing with uncertainties in the
application of complex tax regulations. FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It is
inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts.
SCM reevaluate such uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis
based on factors such as, but not limited to, changes in tax
laws, issues settled under audit and changes in facts or
circumstances. Such changes in recognition or measurement might
result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional
charge to the tax provision in the period.
|
|
|
|
The carrying value of SCMs net deferred tax assets
reflects that SCM has been unable to generate sufficient taxable
income in certain tax jurisdictions. A valuation allowance is
provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not
these items will either expire before SCM is able to realize
their benefit, or that future deductibility is uncertain.
Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax
assets quarterly. At September 30, 2008, SCM has recorded
valuation allowances against all of its deferred tax assets. The
deferred tax assets are still available for SCM to use in the
future to offset taxable income, which would result in the
recognition of a tax benefit and a reduction in its effective
tax rate. Actual operating results and the underlying amount and
category of income in future years could render SCMs
current assumptions, judgments and estimates of the
realizability of deferred tax assets inaccurate, which could
have a material impact on SCMs financial position or
results of operations.
|
|
|
|
SCM accrues the estimated cost of product warranties during the
period of sale. While SCM engages in extensive product quality
programs and processes, including actively monitoring and
evaluating the quality of its component suppliers, SCMs
warranty obligation is affected by actual warranty costs,
including material usage or service delivery costs incurred in
correcting a product failure. If actual material usage or
service delivery costs differ from SCMs estimates,
revisions to estimated warranty liability would be required,
which could have a material impact on SCMs results of
operations.
|
|
|
|
During previous years, SCM has recorded restructuring charges as
it rationalized operations in light of strategic decisions to
align its business focus on certain markets. These measures,
which included major changes in senior management, workforce
reduction, facilities consolidation and the transfer of
production activities to contract manufacturers, were largely
intended to align SCMs capacity and infrastructure to
anticipate customer demand and to transition SCMs
operations to better cost efficiencies. In connection with plans
SCM has adopted, estimated expenses were recorded for severance
and outplacement costs, lease cancellations, asset write-offs
and other restructuring costs. Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard (SFAS) No. 146, Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, requires
that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal
activity initiated after December 31, 2002 be recognized
when the liability is incurred and that the liability be
measured at fair value. Given the significance of, and the
timing of the execution of such activities, this process is
complex and involves periodic reassessments of original
estimates. SCM continually evaluates the adequacy of the
remaining liabilities under its restructuring initiatives.
Although SCM believes that these estimates accurately reflect
the costs of its restructuring
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
and other plans, actual results may differ, thereby requiring
SCM to record additional provisions or reverse a portion of such
provisions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement with TranZfinity
(see Note 13 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for the period ended September 30, 2008) SCM has
entered into a non-marketable equity investment. Non-marketable
equity investments are inherently risky, and a number of these
companies are likely to fail. Their success is dependent on
product development, market acceptance, operational efficiency,
and other factors. In addition, depending on their future
prospects and on market conditions, they may not be able to
raise additional funds when needed or they may receive lower
valuations, with less favorable investment terms than in
previous financings, and SCMs investment might become
impaired. SCM reviews its investments quarterly for indicators
of impairment. Nevertheless, the impairment analysis for
non-marketable equity investments requires significant judgment
to identify events or circumstances that would significantly
harm the value of the investment. The indicators that SCM uses
to identify those circumstances can include, but are not limited
to the investees revenue and earnings trends; the
technological feasibility of the investees products and
technologies; factors related to the investees ability to
remain in business, such as the investees liquidity, debt
ratios, and the rate at which the investee is using its cash;
and the investees receipt of additional funding at a lower
valuation.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)). Under
SFAS No. 141(R), an entity is required to recognize
the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual
contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value
on the acquisition date. It further requires that
acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the
acquisition and expensed as incurred, restructuring costs
generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition
date, and changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the
measurement period be included in income tax expense. In
addition, acquired in-process research and development is
capitalized as an intangible asset and amortized over its
estimated useful life. The adoption of SFAS No. 141(R)
will change SCMs accounting treatment for business
combinations on a prospective basis beginning in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB
No. 51. SFAS No. 160 changes the accounting
and reporting for minority interests, which will be
recharacterized as non-controlling interests and classified as a
component of equity. SFAS No. 160 is effective for SCM
on a prospective basis for business combinations with an
acquisition date beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year
2009. As of September 30, 2008, SCM did not have any
minority interests.
On January 1, 2008, SCM adopted SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits
companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and
other items at fair value using an
instrument-by-instrument
election. The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses
are reported in earnings for items measured using the fair value
option. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have an
impact on SCMs consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
On January 1, 2008, SCM adopted SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, for all financial assets and
financial liabilities and for all non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value
in the financial statements on a recurring basis (i.e.,
at least annually). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances
fair value measurement disclosure. SFAS No. 157 does
not change the accounting for those instruments that were, under
previous GAAP, accounted for at cost or contract value. The
adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a significant
impact on SCMs consolidated financial statements, and the
resulting fair values calculated under SFAS No. 157
after adoption were not significantly different than the fair
values that would have been calculated under previous guidance.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable objective
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs, which
require additional reliance on SCMs
138
judgment, when measuring fair value. A financial
instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy
is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to
the fair value measurement. SFAS No. 157 establishes
three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Quoted prices for identical
instruments in active markets;
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar
instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active and
model-derived valuations, in which all significant inputs are
observable in active markets; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Valuations derived from
valuation techniques, in which one or more significant inputs
are unobservable.
|
SCM uses the following classifications to measure different
financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of
the level in the fair value hierarchy in which each instrument
is generally classified:
Cash equivalents include highly liquid debt investments (money
market fund deposits, commercial paper and treasury bills) with
maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition.
These financial instruments are classified in Level 1 of
the fair value hierarchy.
Short-term investments consist of corporate notes and United
States government agency instruments and are classified as
available-for-sale. These financial instruments are classified
in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. As of
September 30, 2008, SCM had no short-term investments.
Assets that are measured and recognized at fair value on a
recurring basis classified under the appropriate level of the
fair value hierarchy, as of September 30, 2008, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market fund deposits
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
Treasury Bills
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Commercial papers
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
17,447
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,447
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, there are no liabilities that are
measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP 157-1),
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement
No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements that Address
Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13, and
FSP 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157.
FSP 157-1
amends SFAS No. 157 to remove certain leasing
transactions from its scope.
FSP 157-2
delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually),
until the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
SCM is currently evaluating the impact that
SFAS No. 157 will have on its consolidated financial
statements when it is applied to non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities that are not measured at fair value on
a recurring basis beginning in the first quarter of 2009.
139
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and
2007
Net
Revenue
Summary information by product segment for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Period to
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Period to
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Period
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Secure Authentication:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
5,873
|
|
|
$
|
6,140
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
15,758
|
|
|
$
|
17,100
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,172
|
|
|
|
7,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Media and Connectivity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)%
|
|
$
|
3,619
|
|
|
$
|
3,621
|
|
|
|
(0
|
)%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
6,393
|
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
$
|
19,377
|
|
|
$
|
20,721
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,416
|
|
|
|
8,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue for the third quarter of 2008 was $6.4 million,
down 16% from $7.6 million for the same period of 2007. The
decrease in third quarter revenue year over year was primarily
driven by lower sales of SCMs Digital Media and
Connectivity products. For the first nine months of 2008, net
revenue was $19.4 million, down 6% from revenue of
$20.7 million for the first nine months of 2007. The
decrease in revenue for the nine months of 2008 compared with
the prior-year period resulted primarily from lower sales of
SCMs Secure Authentication products in the first and third
quarters of 2008.
SCMs Secure Authentication product line principally
consists of smart card readers and related chip technology that
are primarily used in large security programs where smart cards
are employed to authenticate the identity of people in order to
control access to computers or computer networks; borders;
buildings and other facilities; and services, such as health
care. Also included in this business segment are SCMs
CHIPDRIVE software and reader solutions, which provide
electronic timecard and other productivity applications for
small and medium enterprises and are primarily sold in Europe.
The majority of revenue in SCMs Secure Authentication
business segment is government, financial or enterprise programs
and is subject to significant variability based on the size and
timing of customer orders.
Sales of SCMs Secure Authentication products were
$5.9 million in the third quarter of 2008, down 4% from
sales of $6.1 million in the third quarter of 2007. Sales
levels in the third quarter of 2008 were relatively unchanged in
the U.S., up approximately 20% in Asia and down approximately
20% in Europe, compared with the third quarter of the prior
year. U.S. sales in the third quarter of 2008 increased
against U.S. sales in the prior two quarters due to
stronger demand for smart card readers for U.S. government
programs. Lower sales in Europe were the result of variability
in the timing of orders and regional programs requiring smart
card readers. Higher sales in Asia were the result of increased
sales of smart card interface chips compared with the 2007
period.
For the first nine months of 2008, sales of Secure
Authentication products were $15.8 million, down 8% from
sales of $17.1 million for the first nine months of 2007.
The decrease in sales in the first nine months of 2008 compared
with the prior year was primarily due to a significant reduction
in sales of SCMs smart card reader products for
U.S. government authentication programs in the first two
quarters of 2008, mainly due to project and budget delays.
During the first nine months of 2008, SCM has also experienced
an ongoing shift in the
140
U.S. government market away from external reader devices
and towards interface chips that provide embedded reader
technology in laptops and keyboards. SCM has sold high volumes
of smart card interface chips for embedded readers to laptop and
keyboard manufacturers in Asia that have somewhat offset the
decrease in sales of its external reader devices in the U.S.;
however, these chips have a lower average selling price than
SCMs external reader devices.
SCMs Digital Media and Connectivity product line consists
of digital media readers and related ASIC technology used to
provide an interface for flash memory cards, primarily embedded
in digital photography kiosks, where the readers are used to
download and print digital photos. Two to three customers,
historically, have accounted for approximately two-thirds of
sales in this business segment. As a result, revenue in
SCMs Digital Media and Connectivity product line can
fluctuate significantly quarter to quarter due to variability in
the size and timing of customer orders.
Sales of SCMs Digital Media and Connectivity products were
$0.5 million in the third quarter of 2008, down 65% from
sales of $1.5 million in the same period of 2007. For the
first nine months of 2008, sales of Digital Media and
Connectivity products were $3.6 million, unchanged from
sales of $3.6 million for the first nine months of 2007.
During the third quarter of 2008, digital media reader sales
were well below recent quarterly levels due to unexpectedly
light orders from a major customer.
Gross
Profit Margin
Gross profit margin for the third quarter of 2008 was
$2.9 million, or 46% of revenue, compared with
$3.4 million, or 45% of revenue in the third quarter of
2007.
Gross profit margin for SCMs Secure Authentication
products was $2.7 million, or 47% of revenue for the third
quarter of 2008, compared with $2.8 million, or 46% for the
third quarter of 2007. Gross profit margin in the third quarter
of 2008 reflects a more favorable mix of products sold compared
with the same period of 2007 and ongoing product cost reductions.
Gross profit margin for SCMs Digital Media and
Connectivity products was $0.2 million, or 31% for the
third quarter of 2008, down from $0.6 million, or 41% for
the third quarter of 2007. The decrease in gross profit margin
in the third quarter of 2008 compared with the same period of
2007 was primarily due to lower revenue levels in the 2008
period.
For the first nine months of 2008, gross profit margin was
$8.4 million, or 43% of revenue, compared with
$8.5 million, or 41% of revenue for the first nine months
of 2007. The improvement in gross profit margin in the first
nine months of 2008 compared with the prior year primarily is
due to a more favorable mix of higher margin products overall
and product cost reductions in SCMs Secure Authentication
business.
SCM expects there will be some variation in its gross profit
from period to period, as its gross profit has been and will
continue to be affected by a variety of factors, including,
without limitation, competition, the volume of sales in any
given quarter, product configuration and mix, the availability
of new products, product enhancements, software and services,
inventory write-downs and the cost and availability of
components.
Research
and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Period to
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Period to
|
|
(Dollars in thousands; unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
$
|
815
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,058
|
|
|
$
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
Percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses consist primarily of employee
compensation and fees for the development of hardware and
firmware products. SCM focuses the bulk of its research and
development activities on the development of products for new
and emerging market opportunities.
141
Research and development expenses were $1.0 million, or 15%
of revenue in the third quarter of 2008, up 20% from
$0.8 million, which represented 11% of revenue in the third
quarter of 2007. For the first nine months of 2008, research and
development expenses were $3.1 million, up 31% from
$2.3 million for the first nine months of 2007. Higher
research and development expenses in the third quarter and first
nine months of 2008 compared with the prior year are primarily
due to the development of new contactless Secure Authentication
products and increased development activity related to readers
for the German
e-health
program.
SCM expects its research and development expenses to vary based
on future project demands and on the markets it targets.
Selling
and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Period to
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Period to
|
|
(Dollars in thousands; unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
$
|
2,280
|
|
|
$
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,010
|
|
|
$
|
4,802
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
Percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of employee
compensation as well as tradeshow participation and other
marketing costs. SCM focuses a significant proportion of its
sales and marketing activities on new and emerging market
opportunities, including
e-health,
contactless applications and the market business productivity
solutions for small and medium-sized businesses.
Selling and marketing expenses were $2.3 million, or 36% of
revenue in the third quarter of 2008, up 40% from
$1.6 million, which represented 21% of revenue in the third
quarter of 2007. For the first nine months of 2008, sales and
marketing expenses were $7.0 million, up 46% from
$4.8 million in the first nine months of 2007. Higher sales
and marketing expenses in the third quarter and first nine
months of 2008 compared with the prior year are primarily due to
the hiring of new sales resources over the past several quarters
in Asia, Europe and the Americas to enhance SCMs ability
to address current and future business opportunities, as well as
an increased level of travel expenses related to new business
development activities. Also included in the first nine months
of 2008 are approximately $0.2 million in severance costs
recorded in the second quarter of 2008.
General
and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Period to
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Period to
|
|
(Dollars in thousands; unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
$
|
1,697
|
|
|
$
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,718
|
|
|
$
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
Percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
compensation expenses for employees performing administrative
functions, and professional fees arising from legal, auditing
and other consulting services.
General and administrative expenses were $1.7 million, or
27% of revenue in the third quarter of 2008, up 24% from
$1.4 million, which represented 18% of revenue in the third
quarter of 2007. Higher general and administrative expenses in
the third quarter of 2008 primarily resulted from increased
business development activities related to SCMs strategy
to expand and diversify its customer base and market
opportunities. For the first nine months of 2008, general and
administrative expenses were $4.7 million, down 17% from
$5.7 million in the first nine months of 2007. General and
administrative expense in the first nine months of 2007 included
$1.4 million in severance and other costs associated with
the resignation of SCMs former chief executive officer.
General and administrative expenses in the first nine months of
2008 were also impacted by the devaluation of the dollar against
foreign currencies, namely the Euro, as SCM pays the majority of
these expenses in local currency but accounts for those expenses
in dollars. If the trend in recent weeks continues and the
dollar continues to strengthen in relation to foreign
currencies, SCM expects this impact to be less pronounced in the
fourth quarter of 2008.
142
Amortization
of Intangibles
Amortization of intangibles was zero during the third quarter of
2008 and 2007. For the first nine months of 2008, amortization
of intangibles was zero, compared with $0.3 million during
the first nine months of 2007.
Interest
and Other Income (Expenses), net
Interest and other income (expenses), net consists of interest
earned on invested cash and foreign currency gains or losses.
In the third quarter of 2008, interest income resulting from
invested cash balances was $0.2 million, compared with
interest income of $0.4 million for the third quarter of
2007. In the first nine months of 2008, interest income was
$0.6 million, compared with interest income of
$1.2 million in the first nine months of 2007. The
reduction in interest income reflects reduced cash balances and
the reduction in interest rates in 2008 compared to 2007.
Foreign currency losses were $1.3 million in the third
quarter of 2008 compared with $0.1 million in the third
quarter of 2007. Foreign currency losses were $0.9 million
in the first nine months of 2008 compared with $0.2 million
for the first nine months of 2007. SCMs foreign currency
losses primarily result from the valuation of current assets and
liabilities denominated in a currency other than the functional
currency of the respective entity in the local financial
statements. Accordingly, these foreign currency losses are
predominantly non-cash items. Higher foreign exchange losses in
the third quarter of 2008 are primarily the result of the
weakening of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar, as measured
at the end of the quarter. If the Euro remains weak relative to
the U.S. dollar for the next several weeks, SCM expects
that it will record further losses on foreign currency exchange
in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Income
Taxes
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, SCM
recorded a provision for income taxes of $0.1 million and
$0.2 million, respectively, primarily for minimum taxation,
which could not be offset with operating loss carryforwards and
tax expenses in a foreign subsidiary with no loss carryforwards.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, SCM
recorded a provision for income taxes of $32,000 and
$0.1 million, respectively, primarily for minimum taxation,
which could not be offset with operating loss carryforwards and
tax expenses in a foreign subsidiary with no loss carryforwards.
Discontinued
Operations
On May 22, 2006, SCM completed the sale of substantially
all the assets and some of the liabilities associated with its
DTV solutions business to Kudelski S.A. Net revenue for the DTV
solutions business in both the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 was zero. Net revenue for the DTV
solutions business in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was zero and $0.5 million,
respectively. Operating gain for the DTV solutions business in
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was
$32,000 and $26,000, respectively. Operating loss for the DTV
solutions business for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was $45,000 and $33,000, respectively.
In May 2007, SCM received a final payment of $1.6 million
from Kudelski related to the sale of its DTV solutions business
that resulted in a $1.5 million gain on sale of
discontinued operations in the first quarter of 2007 (See
Note 3 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
the period ended September 30, 2008). During the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007, net gain on the
disposal of discontinued operations was approximately $16,000
and $1.6 million, respectively.
During 2003, SCM completed two transactions to sell its retail
Digital Media and Video business. On July 25, 2003, SCM
completed the sale of its digital video business to Pinnacle
Systems and on August 1, 2003, SCM completed the sale of
its retail digital media reader business to Zio Corporation. Net
revenue for the retail Digital Media and Video business was zero
in each of the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007. Operating loss for the retail Digital Media and
Video business in the three and nine months ended
September 30,
143
2008 was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Operating loss for the retail Digital Media and Video business
was $0.1 million and $0.2 million in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
In April 2008, SCM entered into an agreement to terminate its
lease agreement for premises leased in the UK, which resulted in
approximately $0.4 million in gain on sale of discontinued
operations. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, the total net gain on the disposal of
discontinued operations was approximately $44,000 and
$0.6 million, respectively.
Comparison
of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005
The following table sets forth SCMs statements of
operations as a percentage of net revenue for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
|
|
64.7
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
|
76.3
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(14.7
|
)
|
|
|
(26.0
|
)
|
|
|
(37.5
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Foreign currency gains (losses) and other income (expense)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
|
|
(22.7
|
)
|
|
|
(28.7
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
(22.9
|
)
|
|
|
(29.2
|
)
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
(44.5
|
)%
|
144
Summary information by product segment for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(Dollars in thousands; percentages unaudited)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006 to 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005 to 2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Secure Authentication
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
24,427
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
23,745
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,415
|
|
% of total revenues
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
10,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,120
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Digital Media and Connectivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
6,008
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9,868
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
10,521
|
|
% of total revenues
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,710
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
30,435
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
33,613
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
27,936
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,830
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Fiscal
Year 2007 Revenue Compared with Fiscal Year 2006
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007 was
$30.4 million, a decrease of 9% from $33.6 million in
2006. This decrease was due primarily to a 39% decline in sales
of Digital Media and Connectivity products, primarily due to the
loss of a major customer at the beginning of 2007, offset in
part by a 3% increase in sales of Secure Authentication
products. Sales of PCS Security products accounted for 80% of
total revenue in 2007 and sales of Digital Media and
Connectivity products accounted for 20% of revenue.
Secure Authentication product revenue was $24.4 million in
2007, an increase of 3% from $23.7 million in 2006. In
2007, the composition of sales of SCMs Secure
Authentication products remained very similar to the prior year,
except that within Europe, SCM had less revenue from the various
government and other security programs that comprise the
majority of its European sales, while SCMs CHIPDRIVE
products contributed a more significant amount of revenue. Sales
of readers for U.S. government projects to comply with
Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 and other federal
mandates comprised the largest percentage of total Secure
Authentication sales; followed by sales of readers for
electronic identification and other programs in Europe; sales of
readers for enterprise security programs in Asia; and sales of
CHIPDRIVE software and readers.
Revenue from SCMs Digital Media and Connectivity product
line was $6.0 million in 2007, a decrease of 39% from
$9.9 million in 2006. The revenue decrease in 2007 was
primarily due to the loss of a major customer at the beginning
of the year. Sales to another major customer increased
significantly in the second half of the year; however, this was
not sufficient to offset the decrease in sales in the first half
of the year.
Fiscal
Year 2006 Revenue Compared with Fiscal Year 2005
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2006 was
$33.6 million, an increase of 20% from $27.9 million
in 2005. This increase was driven by higher demand for Secure
Authentication products, offset by a slight decrease in sales of
Digital Media and Connectivity products. Sales of Secure
Authentication products accounted for 71% and sales of Digital
Media and Connectivity products accounted for 29% of total
revenue in 2006.
Sales of Secure Authentication products increased 36% to
$23.7 million in 2006, compared with $17.4 million in
2005. In 2006, higher revenue levels were primarily the result
of higher sales of smart card readers in the United States
for U.S. government security projects as well as growth in
demand for SCMs products in Europe primarily related to
e-passport
projects.
145
Revenue from SCMs Digital Media and Connectivity product
line decreased 6% from $10.5 million in 2005 to
$9.9 million in 2006. The revenue decrease in 2006 was
primarily due to a reduction in the price SCM was able to charge
the primary customer for one of its digital media reader
products, as the customer had decided they did not need the
advanced functionality provided by components SCM previously had
used in the readers. SCM therefore began to use simpler and less
expensive components and thus the price of the product was
lowered.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit for 2007 was $12.7 million, or 42% of revenue.
During 2007, gross profit was impacted by a favorable mix of
products sold, better inventory management and product cost
reductions, particularly in the Secure Authentication business.
Offsetting these positive factors were low sales levels of
Digital Media and Connectivity products in the first half of the
year and low sales levels of Secure Authentication products in
the second quarter of 2007 as well as continued pricing pressure
over the last several quarters. By product segment, gross profit
for Secure Authentication products was 43% and gross profit for
Digital Media and Connectivity products was 36% in 2007.
Gross profit for 2006 was $11.9 million, or 35% of revenue.
During 2006, gross profit for Secure Authentication products was
impacted by increased pricing pressure, offset by the effect of
a more favorable product mix as SCM increased the number of
contactless readers sold, particularly for
e-passport
applications. During the fourth quarter of 2006, SCM experienced
an increase in gross profit in the Secure Authentication
business primarily due to better inventory management and cost
reduction programs established earlier in the year. In
SCMs Digital Media and Connectivity business, gross profit
was impacted by pricing pressure, as well as by an increasing
proportion of lower margin products sold.
Gross profit for 2005 was $10.8 million, or 39% of revenue.
2005 gross profit was negatively impacted by inventory
write-downs of approximately $1.3 million in the Secure
Authentication segment, severance costs for manufacturing
personnel in SCMs Singapore facility of $0.5 million,
as well as by pricing pressure, mix of products sold and tooling
costs.
SCMs gross profit has been, and will continue to be,
affected by a variety of factors, including competition, the
volume of sales in any given quarter, product configuration and
mix, the availability of new products, product enhancements,
software and services, inventory write-downs and the cost and
availability of components. Accordingly, gross profit
percentages are expected to continue to fluctuate from period to
period.
Research
and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(Dollars in thousands; percentages unaudited)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006 to 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005 to 2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
$
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
4,081
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Research and development expenses consist primarily of employee
compensation and fees for the development of prototype products.
Research and development costs are primarily related to hardware
and firmware development.
SCM focuses the bulk of its research and development activities
on the development of products for new and emerging market
opportunities. In 2007 and 2006, SCM focused primarily on the
development of smart card reader technology for the German
e-healthcard
program, electronic ID applications and the global
e-passport
market. Research and development expenses were $3.1 million
in 2007, or 10% of revenue, compared with $3.8 million in
2006, or 11% of revenue, a decrease of 17%. This decrease was
primarily due to a lower level of external resources used.
Research and development expenses in 2006 decreased 8% from
$4.1 million in 2005, or 15% of revenue, primarily as a
result of lower level of external resources used.
146
Selling
and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(Dollars in thousands; percentages unaudited)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006 to 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005 to 2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
$
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
$
|
7,498
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,040
|
|
Percentage of revenue (unaudited)
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of employee
compensation as well as tradeshow participation and other
marketing costs. SCM focuses a significant proportion of its
sales and marketing activities on new and emerging market
opportunities. In 2007 and 2006, these opportunities included
electronic ID applications, the early stages of the
e-healthcard
program in Germany and
e-passport.
Selling and marketing expenses were $6.6 million in 2007,
or 22% of revenue, compared with $7.5 million in 2006, or
22% of revenue, a decrease of 12%. The decrease was primarily
due to a reduction in sales personnel and activities as a result
of restructuring activities at the end of 2006.
In 2006, sales and marketing expenses increased 7% from
$7.0 million in 2005, which represented 25% of revenue. The
increase primarily consisted of $0.3 million in severance
costs related to the consolidation and closure of facilities in
the third quarter of 2006, as part of SCMs efforts to
lower expenses.
General
and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(Dollars in thousands; percentages unaudited)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006 to 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005 to 2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
$
|
7,132
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
7,548
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9,198
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
compensation expenses for employees performing administrative
functions, and professional fees arising from legal, auditing
and other consulting services.
In 2007, general and administrative expenses were
$7.1 million, or 23% of revenue, compared with
$7.5 million, or 22% of revenue in 2006, a decrease of 6%.
The decrease primarily was due to the consolidation and transfer
of SCMs corporate finance and compliance functions from
the U.S. to Germany and the completion of the transfer of
local finance functions from Singapore and the U.S. to
Germany at the end of 2006, offset in part by the payment of
$1.4 million in severance and other costs related to
SCMs former CEO in the second quarter of 2007.
General and administrative expenses in 2006 decreased 18% from
$9.2 million in 2005, which represented 33% of revenue.
This reduction primarily related to the consolidation and
transfer of SCMs corporate finance and compliance
functions from the U.S. to Germany and the transfer of
local finance functions from Singapore and the U.S. to
Germany, which resulted in a more streamlined and efficient
audit process, a decrease in the number of personnel required to
prepare SCMs financial statements and a reduction in
expenditures for third party professional fees. The majority of
the decrease occurred in the fourth quarter of 2006, which also
resulted in a more favorable comparison for the year as a whole.
Amortization
of Intangibles
Amortization of intangible assets was $0.3 million in 2007,
$0.7 million in 2006 and $0.7 million in 2005. The
decrease in amortization amounts in 2007 compared with previous
periods reflects the completion of amortization of intangible
assets in the second quarter of 2007. No further amounts remain
to be amortized in future periods as the intangible assets have
been fully amortized.
Restructuring
and Other Charges (Credits)
During 2006, SCM recorded restructuring and other charges of
$1.4 million, primarily related to severance costs for
general and administrative personnel that were affected by
SCMs decision to relocate corporate finance and compliance
functions from the U.S. to Germany and local finance
functions from the U.S. and Singapore to Germany, as well
as the outsourcing of manufacturing operations from SCMs
Singapore facility to contract
147
manufacturers. Severance costs for manufacturing personnel of
approximately $0.3 million have been recorded in cost of
revenue (See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for the period ended December 31, 2007).
During 2005, SCM incurred restructuring and other charges of
$0.8 million, which included $0.2 million of severance
costs related to a reduction in force of non-manufacturing
personnel at SCMs Singapore facility, resulting from the
decision to outsource manufacturing operations to contract
manufacturers. Severance costs for manufacturing personnel of
$0.5 million were recorded in cost of revenue (See
Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the
period ended December 31, 2007). Restructuring and other
charges in 2005 also included $0.1 million primarily
related to changes in estimates for European tax related matters.
Interest
Income
Interest income consists of interest earned on invested cash.
Interest income resulting from cash balances was
$1.6 million in 2007, $1.4 million in 2006 and
$0.7 million in 2005. Higher interest income in 2007
compared with 2006 resulted primarily from higher interest rates
in 2007. Higher interest income in 2006 compared with 2005
resulted from higher interest rates and a greater amount of cash
invested. The 2005 period includes a cumulative adjustment to
interest income taken in the second quarter for the correction
of an error in accounting for the amortization of premiums and
discounts on investments. The correction of the error resulted
in a reduction of interest income in the second quarter and the
year of 2005 of approximately $0.3 million.
Foreign
Currency Gains and Losses and Other Income and
Expenses
SCM recorded foreign currency exchange losses and other expense
of $0.3 million in 2007 and $0.2 million in 2006, and
recorded foreign currency exchange gains and other income of
$1.7 million in 2005. Changes in currency valuation in all
periods presented were primarily a result of exchange rate
movements between the U.S. dollar and the Euro.
During 2007, foreign currency losses were $0.3 million, due
primarily to the devaluation of the U.S. dollar. No other
income was recorded. During 2006, foreign currency losses were
$0.3 million, due primarily to the devaluation of the
U.S. dollar. Other income was $0.1 million. During
2005, foreign currency gains were $1.6 million, due
primarily to the revaluation of dollar holdings in an entity
where the Euro is the functional currency. Other income was
$0.1 million, primarily attributable to the settlement of
transactional tax issues in Europe.
Income
Taxes
In 2007, 2006 and 2005, SCM recorded provisions for income taxes
of $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, primarily resulting from minimum taxation and
taxes payable in foreign jurisdictions that are not offset by
operating loss carryforwards.
Discontinued
Operations
On May 22, 2006, SCM completed the sale of substantially
all the assets and some of the liabilities associated with its
DTV solutions business to Kudelski S.A. Revenue for the DTV
solutions business was $0.5 million, $13.5 million and
$20.8 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Operating gain (loss) for the DTV solutions business was
$0.1 million, $(1.3) million and $(1.9) million
in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net gain (loss) for the
DTV solutions business in 2007, 2006 and 2005 was
$0.1 million, $3.0 million, and $(1.6) million,
respectively.
During 2003, SCM completed two transactions to sell its retail
Digital Media and Video business. On July 25, 2003, SCM
completed the sale of its digital video business to Pinnacle
Systems and on August 1, 2003, SCM completed the sale of
its retail digital media reader business to Zio Corporation.
SCM recorded no revenue for the retail Digital Media and Video
business in 2007, 2006 or 2005. Operating loss for the retail
Digital Media and Video business for the same periods was
$0.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million,
respectively. Net gain (loss) for the retail Digital Media and
Video business for 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $(0.3) million,
$0.5 million and $(0.5) million, respectively.
148
During 2007, SCM recorded a net gain on disposal of discontinued
operations of $1.6 million, primarily related to the final
payment received for the sale of the assets of the DTV solutions
business. During 2006, SCM recorded a net gain on disposal of
discontinued operations of $5.2 million, primarily related
to the sale of the assets of the DTV solutions business. During
2005, SCMs net loss on disposal of discontinued operations
was $2.2 million, of which the majority related to the
settlement of litigation with DVD Cre8, Inc. and related legal
costs.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2008, SCMs working capital, which
it has defined as current assets less current liabilities, was
$27.8 million, compared to $34.0 million as of
December 31, 2007, a decrease of approximately
$6.2 million. The reduction in working capital for the
first nine months of 2008 primarily reflects a reduction of cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments of
$7.4 million and a combined decrease in accounts
receivable, inventories and other current assets of
$0.8 million. The reduction in other current assets was
partly offset by a $2.0 million decrease in current
liabilities.
Working capital at December 31, 2007 of $34.0 million
increased by approximately $2.0 million from
$32.0 million at December 31, 2006. Current assets
decreased by $2.6 million, resulting from a reduction in
cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of
$4.5 million and a reduction of other current assets of
$1.0 million, which was only partly offset by increases in
accounts receivable of $2.1 million and in inventories of
$0.8 million. Current liabilities decreased by
$4.7 million, resulting from a reduction in accounts
payable of $1.5 million, a reduction in accruals of
$1.6 million and a decrease in income taxes payable by
$1.6 million.
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were
$25.0 million as of September 30, 2008, a decrease of
approximately $7.4 million compared to $32.4 million
as of December 31, 2007. Short-term investments were zero
at September 30, 2008, compared to $13.8 million at
December 31, 2007. The reduction in short-term investments
is the result of SCMs decision in late 2007 to move
liquidity resources into more highly liquid debt investments
(money market fund deposits, commercial paper and treasury
bills) with maturities of three months or less at the date of
acquisition.
The following summarizes SCMs cash flows for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating cash used in continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(6,555
|
)
|
Operating cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
Investing cash provided
|
|
|
13,339
|
|
Financing cash flow
|
|
|
18
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,420
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
18,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
25,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first nine months of 2008, cash used in operating
activities was $6.9 million. This use of cash consisted of
a net loss of approximately $6.0 million, the use of
approximately $0.2 million from net changes in operating
assets and liabilities and the use of approximately
$1.2 million from the net changes in the assets and
liabilities from discontinued operations. This effect was
partially offset by positive cash flow adjustments for
depreciation, amortization and stock compensation totaling
$0.5 million.
In 2007, cash and cash equivalents decreased by
$13.5 million, primarily due to cash used for additional
purchases of short-term investments. While operating activities
used $5.4 million and investing activities used
$9.3 million, financing activities resulted in a positive
cash flow of $0.1 million and the effect of exchange rates
on cash and cash equivalents was $1.1 million.
149
Cash used in continuing operations of $6.0 million in 2007
was primarily due to a net loss before discontinued operations,
depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation
expenses of $2.0 million. The remaining $4.0 million
cash used in continuing operations resulted mainly from the net
effect of changes in working capital. Cash provided in operating
activities from discontinued operations was $0.5 million
and consisted primarily of the final payment received for the
sale of the assets of the DTV solutions business of
$1.6 million, partly offset by payments for accounts
payables and accruals related to discontinued operations.
Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations of
$9.3 million in 2007 resulted primarily from the purchases
of short-term investments of $28.7 million, partially
offset by maturities of $19.6 million. The remaining
$0.2 million was used for capital expenditures.
Cash provided by financing activities resulted from the issuance
of common stock of $0.1 million related to SCMs
employee stock purchase and stock option programs. At
December 31, 2007, SCMs outstanding stock options as
a percentage of outstanding shares was 12%, compared to 11% at
December 31, 2006.
Significant commitments that will require the use of cash in
future periods include obligations under operating leases,
inventory purchase commitments and other contractual agreements.
Gross committed lease obligations were approximately
$4.6 million at September 30, 2008. As of
September 30, 2008, inventory and other purchase
commitments due within one year were approximately
$10.1 million and additional inventory and other purchase
commitments due within two years were approximately
$2.6 million.
SCM currently expects that its current capital resources and
available borrowings should be sufficient to meet its operating
and capital requirements through at least the end of 2009. SCM
may, however, seek additional debt or equity financing prior to
that time. There can be no assurance that additional capital
will be available to SCM on favorable terms or at all. The sale
of additional debt or equity securities may cause dilution to
existing stockholders.
Cash provided from investing activities of $13.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily
from the maturity of short-term investments, which was partly
offset by capital expenditures of $0.5 million.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
SCM has not entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, or
issued guarantees to third parties.
Contractual
Obligations
The following summarizes expected cash requirements for
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
$
|
5,187
|
|
|
$
|
1,870
|
|
|
$
|
1,820
|
|
|
$
|
633
|
|
|
$
|
864
|
|
Purchase commitments
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Obligations
|
|
$
|
8,989
|
|
|
$
|
5,672
|
|
|
$
|
1,820
|
|
|
$
|
633
|
|
|
$
|
864
|
|
The long-term income taxes payable of $0.2 million
accounted for under FIN 48 are not included in the table
above. SCM is unable to reliably estimate the timing of future
payments related to uncertain tax positions.
SCM leases its facilities, certain equipment, and automobiles
under noncancelable operating lease agreements. Those lease
agreements existing as of September 30, 2008, expire at
various dates during the next five years.
Purchases for inventories are highly dependent upon forecasts of
customer demand. Due to the uncertainty in demand from its
customers, SCM may have to change, reschedule, or cancel
purchases or purchase orders from its suppliers. These changes
may lead to vendor cancellation charges on these purchases or
contractual commitments. SCM enters into a number of agreements
for the sourcing of supplies and materials including some
arrangements with minimum purchase commitments. As of
September 30, 2008, total purchase and contractual
commitments due within one year were approximately
$10.1 million, and additional purchase and contractual
commitments due within two years were approximately
$2.6 million.
150
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
There have been no changes in, and SCM has had no disagreements
with its accountants with respect to, its accounting and
financial disclosure.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign
Currencies
SCM transacts business in various foreign currencies and
accordingly, it is subject to exposure from adverse movements in
foreign currency exchange rates. This exposure is primarily
related to local currency denominated sales and operating
expenses in Europe, India and Japan, where SCM conducts business
in both local currencies and U.S. dollars. SCM assesses the
need to utilize financial instruments to hedge foreign currency
exposure on an ongoing basis.
SCMs foreign currency exchange gains and losses are
primarily the result of the revaluation of intercompany
receivables/payables (denominated in U.S. dollars) and
trade receivables (denominated in a currency other than the
functional currency) to the functional currency of the
subsidiary. SCM has performed a sensitivity analysis as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006 using a modeling technique which
evaluated the hypothetical impact of a 10% movement in the value
of the U.S. dollar compared to the functional currency of
the subsidiary, with all other variables held constant, to
determine the incremental transaction gains or losses that would
have been incurred. The foreign exchange rates used were based
on market rates in effect at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
The results of this hypothetical sensitivity analysis indicated
that a hypothetical 10% movement in foreign currency exchange
rates would result in increased foreign currency gains or losses
of $0.9 million and $1.1 million for 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Fixed
Income Investments
SCM does not use derivative financial instruments in its
investment portfolio. SCM does, however, limit its exposure to
interest rate and credit risk by establishing and strictly
monitoring clear policies and guidelines for its fixed income
portfolios. At the present time, the maximum duration of any
investment in SCMs portfolio is limited to less than one
year. The guidelines also establish credit quality standards,
limits on exposure to one issue or issuer, as well as to the
type of instrument. Due to the limited duration and credit risk
criteria SCM has established, its exposure to market and credit
risk is not expected to be material.
At December 31, 2007, SCM had $18.6 million in cash
and cash equivalents and $13.8 million in short-term
investments. Based on its cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments as of December 31, 2007, a
hypothetical 10% change in interest rates along the entire
interest rate yield curve would not be expected to materially
affect the fair value of SCMs financial instruments that
are exposed to changes in interest rates.
At December 31, 2006, SCM had $32.1 million in cash
and cash equivalents and $4.8 million in short-term
investments. Based on its cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments as of December 31, 2006, a
hypothetical 10% change in interest rates along the entire
interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair
value of SCMs financial instruments that are exposed to
changes in interest rates.
There has been no significant change in SCMs exposure to
market risk during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
151
INFORMATION
ABOUT HIRSCH ELECTRONICS
Overview
Hirsch Electronics Corporation, a privately-held business
entity, was incorporated in the state of California in 1981 to
pursue opportunities for a high security, digital keypad.
Hirschs business later grew to include full-featured
electronic access control systems, and then a wide range of
products and professional services including enterprise-class
security management systems with integrated access control,
intrusion detection, badging and video features. Hirsch
currently competes primarily in the security management
system/physical access control market. It designs, engineers,
manufactures and markets software and hardware. It also offers
professional services. Additionally, it buys and resells various
security products, computers, peripherals and accessories used
in a security system.
Hirsch sells its products through the dealer/systems integrator
distribution channel. Hirsch products are installed in dozens of
countries. The majority of installations are located in the
United States, and the next most significant regions are Europe
and Asia. Hirsch products are installed in every major industry
segment, with the highest number of Hirsch installations
occurring in market segments requiring a higher-than-average
level of security effectiveness, such as government, critical
infrastructure, banking, healthcare, education, retail, data
centers, manufacturing operations, refineries and
transportation. Hirsch believes it redefined physical access
control with the invention of the scrambling keypad more than
twenty-five years ago. Continual innovations earned Hirsch
numerous industry awards.
Principal
Products or Services and their Markets
Hirsch designs and manufactures commercial security systems for
worldwide markets. Hirsch systems are used to manage the
security operation within an organization and to perform
identity authentication, access control, alarm monitoring, video
surveillance and recording, and employee identification card
production. Hirschs solutions help customers to enforce
policies, to mitigate risk and liability, to prevent incidents,
to ensure regulatory compliance, and to safeguard employees,
information and assets.
Hirschs brands, products and categories:
|
|
|
|
|
Controllers: the DIGI*TRAC family of high
security controllers;
|
|
|
|
Software: the Velocity Security Management
System and numerous customer-specific middleware and software
applications;
|
|
|
|
Readers, keypads, biometrics: includes
ScramblePad family of high security keypad and keypad+reader
devices (ScramblePad, ScrambleProx, ScrambleSmartProx),
Verification Station and others;
|
|
|
|
Smart cards, proximity cards: includes cards,
fobs and other credential-carrying tokens;
|
|
|
|
Identity Management: includes identity and
credential management system software, card management software,
smart cards, biometric devices, photo badges, printers and
middleware to enable interoperability links to outside watch
lists and other database services;
|
|
|
|
Video, CCTV: includes cameras, DVR, NVR and
video management software; and
|
|
|
|
Accessories: includes products such as
scanners, power-over-Ethernet (PoE) injectors and fiber optic
transceivers.
|
The Hirsch Professional Services Group employs a team of IT
professionals with expertise in .NET, .HTML, Java,
C#, Visual Basic, databases, networking and other technologies
to design, develop and deliver a variety of customized
solutions. The Professional Services Group services and
solutions are:
|
|
|
|
|
planning and deployment;
|
|
|
|
migrations and upgrades;
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
middleware and programs to enable interoperability with other
applications, databases and systems such as HR system, directory
services (PC/network log-on), provisioning, command &
control, central station, parking, elevators, HVAC, lighting,
other devices and, other databases;
|
|
|
|
redundant and fault-tolerant configurations;
|
|
|
|
specialized configurations for the mega-enterprise;
|
|
|
|
web browser-based solutions;
|
|
|
|
compliance-related features and reports; and
|
|
|
|
customized functionality in any Hirsch offering, most typically
access control and identity management.
|
Hirsch also offers training classes to its end-user customers
and dealers.
Where appropriate or necessary, Hirsch utilizes strategic
partnerships to enhance its product offering. For instance, it
integrates its products with partners offerings in the
areas of identity management systems and card management systems
to deliver an end-to-end solution for personal identity
verification card issuance.
The major segments in which Hirsch participates are forecasted
to grow, and the industry trends are aligned to benefit Hirsch.
Increased demand and revenue growth in the security market are
being driven by several factors and trends including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
some government regulations mandate, or indirectly increase
demand for, new security product purchases. Many employees are,
or will soon be, required to use new identification and access
cards smart cards, such as Personal Identity
Verification (PIV) cards, Transportation Worker Identification
Credential (TWIC) cards, First Responder Authentication
Credential (FRAC) cards, or Aviation Credential Interoperable
Solution (ACIS) cards. These new card types must be read by new
readers and sometimes new complete access control systems.
Regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Sarbanes-Oxley may also spur
security product purchases as organizations lock down access to
information systems and record storage rooms;
|
|
|
|
the U.S. federal government is providing substantial grant
money for certain identity management and security management
solutions to be utilized for both public and private enterprise.
Program examples include the Homeland Security Grant Program
(HSGP), Port Security Grant Program, Transit Security Grant
Program, and Freight Rail Security Grant Program;
|
|
|
|
the IT department is increasingly involved in evaluating
security system purchases, and IT buyers tend to demand
IP-enabled,
scalable, open and interoperable solutions for which Hirsch has
a substantial offering;
|
|
|
|
newer technologies such as
IP-enabled
products, smart cards and digital identities are gaining
significant traction and becoming more acceptable to the mass
market rather than only early adopters;
|
|
|
|
savvy organizations are increasingly demanding solutions that
deliver trust and higher security, and Hirsch
believes it is a leader in the high-security space and for
enabling trust via digital identities, certificates, public key
infrastructure (PKI) and encryption;
|
|
|
|
executives and managers in the market are increasingly
recognizing that effective security can align with and support
the organizations overall goals through regulatory
compliance, risk reduction and liability mitigation;
|
|
|
|
there exists a continuing, if not increasing, fear of
infringement, ranging from identity theft to attack by a
disgruntled worker or terrorist; and
|
|
|
|
many installed security management systems are getting old or
are proving incapable of providing the scalability or features
needed, which leads to replacement.
|
153
Distribution
Methods
Hirsch sells the majority of its products through
Hirsch-authorized dealers (also known as integrators, value
added resellers, installers, and partners) who in turn resell
and install the products. Hirsch dealers sign agreements with
Hirsch and are trained by Hirsch personnel. The Hirsch
Professional Services Group sells both through Hirsch-authorized
dealers and also directly to customer and dealers, when
appropriate.
Hirsch authorized dealers are supported by approximately ten
Hirsch regional managers (RMs) located across the U.S.; the
Hirsch EMEA regional office, which supports Europe; the Middle
East and Africa and some West Asia and South Asia partners; the
Hirsch Asia Pacific office; and approximately ten customer
service personnel in Santa Ana. The Hirsch Government Programs
Group focuses on marketing efforts aimed at top-level contacts
at federal agencies. Hirsch sells direct to a very small number
of sensitive federal government customers. Hirsch also sells
through an IT electronics distributor to a very small number of
federal government customers.
Status of
Any Publicly Announced New Product or Service
Hirschs Identity and Access Management System is a suite
of integrated hardware and software products that allow
customers to perform the following tasks:
|
|
|
|
|
Issue smart cards: collect biometrics, link to
background check services, obtain a certificate from the
Certificate Authority (CA), and encode and print smart cards.
Specialized workflow software guides the user through identity
management best practices;
|
|
|
|
Register/enroll smart cards in the physical security
system: Bring the new smart cards
information into the access control system, convert the access
privileges from the old card to new, and deactivate the old card;
|
|
|
|
Use smart cards: Numerous Hirsch smart card
readers are available including the RUU Verification
Station to validate the card, PIN code
and/or
fingerprint before granting entry; and
|
|
|
|
Check for revocation of the cards
certificate: A service/applet for Velocity
Security Management System periodically checks the validity of
the users certificate against the Online Certificate
Status Protocol (OCSP) or Certificate Revocation List (CRL)
using Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). The Velocity service then
deactivates user access privileges if appropriate.
|
Hirschs Identity and Access Management System was
developed primarily to help U.S. federal government sites
meet the mandates set forth in Federal Information Processing
Standard (FIPS) 201, which relates to personal identity
verification cards. This suite also can be used in private
industry. Elements of the suite are installed and operational at
several Hirsch government customers.
Competitive
Business Conditions, Competitive Position, and Methods of
Competition
The security management system market is highly competitive,
rapidly evolving and fragmented. It is subject to changing and
evolving technology, shifting customer needs and frequent
introduction of new products. Additional competitors likely will
continue to enter the market and become significant long-term
competitors and, as a result, competition is likely to increase.
Little to no data exists to reliably quantify market size or
competitive market shares.
Hirsch competes primarily in the commercial (i.e.,
non-residential) portion of the physical access
control segment of the security industry. The Physical
Access Control product categories are:
|
|
|
|
|
integrated security management systems, which typically bundle
access control, badging/card production, alarm monitoring and
some video features into a single package;
|
|
|
|
access control software;
|
|
|
|
access controllers; and
|
|
|
|
keypads, readers and cards including biometrics and smart cards.
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
Hirschs secondary competitive product categories are:
|
|
|
|
video/ CCTV;
|
|
|
|
intrusion detection (also known as burglar alarm) systems;
|
|
|
|
command & control systems;
|
|
|
|
identification card production products;
|
|
|
|
Identity management systems (IDMS) and digital identity-capable
products;
|
|
|
|
Card management systems (CMS); and
|
|
|
|
building automation systems.
|
Hirschs products and services can be termed
enterprise class, meaning that they can be scaled to
secure very large enterprises, such as those with hundreds of
buildings and thousands of doors. There are few access control
manufacturers that can effectively compete in this
large-installations market space. Hirsch believes its primary
competitors in its large installations business are:
|
|
|
|
|
AMAG (owned by G4Tec);
|
|
|
|
GE Security;
|
|
|
|
Honeywell;
|
|
|
|
Lenel (owned by United Technologies); and
|
|
|
|
Software House (owned by Tyco).
|
Additional competitors to Hirschs access control system
business include:
|
|
|
|
|
Apollo Security Sales, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Brivo;
|
|
|
|
Continental Access (owned by NAPCO Security Systems, Inc.);
|
|
|
|
DSX;
|
|
|
|
HID (owned by Assa Abloy);
|
|
|
|
Johnson Controls;
|
|
|
|
Keri Systems, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
MDI, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Paxton;
|
|
|
|
PCSC; and
|
|
|
|
S2 Security Corporation.
|
Hirschs competition ranges from security divisions of
large, global conglomerates to small companies and
start-ups.
Start-up
companies are particularly prevalent in the biometrics and video
segments.
Hirsch believes that no one competitor is dominant in the
industry. Certain competitors have substantially greater
financial, engineering, manufacturing, sales, marketing, channel
and partner resources than Hirsch.
Hirsch sometimes competes with third parties that are also
Hirsch suppliers, development partners
and/or prime
contractors. For example, Hirsch entered into a joint
development agreement with Cogent systems to produce the Hirsch
Verification Station, while Cogent Systems also sells biometric
and identity management system products that may compete with
Hirschs offering. Similarly, Hirsch resells HID readers,
and HID sells readers and access control systems that may
compete with Hirschs offering. Arrangements such as the
two described in this paragraph have not had a materially
adverse affect on Hirschs financial results.
155
Competition exists between manufacturers for reseller partners.
Hirsch has many long-term dealer/partners and good geographic
coverage in most markets targeted for penetration. Additionally,
Hirsch is continually evaluating new dealerships. Some Hirsch
dealers sell only Hirsch products as their access control
solution, while some sell other manufacturers products in
addition to Hirsch products as their access control solution.
Hirsch believes that it and its product/service offering are
generally evaluated as more favorable than many competitors on
criteria such as company longevity, product reliability,
interoperability with other systems and databases, flexible
configuration and high-security features. Hirsch and its
product/service offering are sometimes evaluated as less
favorable than some competitors on criteria such as price,
physical size and weight of certain products, and processing
speed of certain products.
Hirsch believes it competes favorably with most competitors in
its primary market segments. The ability to remain competitive
will depend to a great extent upon Hirschs ongoing product
development and channel development performance.
Sources
and Availability of Raw Materials and the Names of Principal
Suppliers
Most component parts used in Hirsch products are standard,
off-the-shelf items, which are, or can be, purchased
from two or more sources. Because Hirsch has been building its
core products for several years, there are a few parts that have
reached end-of-life status. Hirsch has been able to continue to
source those parts, but continued availability and pricing of
older components in the future is not guaranteed. To mitigate
this risk, Hirsch is designing new products that also will use
standard off-the-shelf parts that are all expected to be in
production for a greater number of years in the future.
A significant portion of Hirschs revenue is derived from
the resale of cards and card readers from HID. If that supply
were to be disrupted, Hirsch would be adversely affected. Hirsch
resells Dell computers and servers, and disruption of that
supply would adversely affect it. Hirsch out-sources the
stuffing of printed circuit boards to local manufacturers. The
bulk of that out-sourcing is to a single company, and
disruptions within that company would adversely affect Hirsch.
There are numerous similar manufacturing companies within
Southern California, so any disruption could probably be
mitigated within a reasonable time.
Customer
Base
Hirsch sells its products through a dealer/systems integrator
channel that is diverse in terms of geography, size and
products/services offered. Hirsch also sells directly to some
government agencies through the General Services Administration
program. The top ten customers for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2008 accounted for approximately 30% of
Hirschs revenue. Therefore, Hirsch believes it is not
dependent upon one or a few customers, the loss of which could
have an adverse effect on business operations or financial
condition.
Patents,
Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty
Agreements or Labor Contracts
Hirschs success depends significantly upon its proprietary
technology. It currently relies on a combination of patents,
copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality
agreements and contractual provisions to protect its proprietary
rights, which afford only limited protection. It currently holds
four U.S. patents, has three registered trademarks, and
utilizes approximately 22 unregistered trademarks.
Although Hirsch often seeks to protect its proprietary
technology through patents, it is possible that no new patents
will be issued, that Hirschs proprietary products or
technologies are not patentable, and that any issued patent will
fail to provide it with any competitive advantages. To mitigate
part of that risk, Hirsch insures its main patent with its
Intellectual Property Infringement Abatement Insurance.
While intellectual property rights are important to
Hirschs success, neither Hirschs business as a whole
nor any segment of its business is materially dependent on any
particular patent, trademark or license.
156
Royalty
Agreements with Secure Keyboards, Ltd. and Secure Networks,
Ltd.
Effective November 1994, Hirsch entered into a settlement
agreement with two limited partnerships, Secure Keyboards, Ltd.
(Keyboards) and Secure Networks, Ltd.
(Networks). Under the terms of a previous agreement,
Hirsch purchased the exclusive rights to certain patents and
technology from Keyboards and Networks.
Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Hirsch has agreed
to pay a royalty of 4.25% of revenues to Keyboards for the
period from December 1, 1994 to December 31, 2020 and
5.5% of revenues to Networks for the period from
December 1, 1994 to December 31, 2011, based on an
allocation of revenues recognized by Hirsch, starting at 55% and
45% of its revenues for Keyboards and Networks, respectively.
The royalty is payable when cash is received for the revenue
recognized. The overall allocation of revenues recognized, upon
which the respective royalty is calculated, will increase by
2.08% annually for Keyboards and decrease by 2.08% annually for
Networks through December 31, 2011. No royalties will be
payable to Networks for revenues recognized after
December 31, 2011. The final payment to Networks is due on
January 30, 2012. From January 1, 2012 to
December 31, 2020, the royalty to Keyboards will be based
on 4.25% of all revenues recognized by Hirsch. The final royalty
payment to Keyboards is due on January 30, 2021.
In connection with the signing of the Merger Agreement, Robert
J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland, as two of the four general
partners of Keyboards, delivered a letter of understanding to
SCM, as amended and restated January 30, 2009. In addition,
Robert J. Parsons and Lawrence W. Midland, as the two general
partners of Networks, delivered a substantially similar letter
of understanding to SCM, as amended and restated
January 30, 2009.
Each letter of understanding was prepared in connection with
SCMs desire to clarify a proposed structure of the
business relationship between SCM and Hirsch as it affects or
relates to royalty payments to Keyboards or Networks, as
applicable, under the existing settlement agreement. Subject to
the consummation of the Merger, each letter of understanding
contained clarifications of the SCM and Hirsch business
relationship and its resulting impact on the companies
respective revenue streams and on Keyboards or
Networks revenue base, as applicable, which clarifications
were acknowledged and accepted by Robert J. Parsons and Lawrence
W. Midland in their capacities as general partners of Keyboards
and Networks, respectively.
On February 9, 2009 and February 11, 2009, counsel representing
the two general partners of Keyboards who are not currently a
party to the letter of understanding sent communications to SCM
and Hirsch objecting to the letter of understanding, and
indicating that the two general partners will not sign the
letter of understanding. If the parties are not able to resolve
the matter, a condition to SCMs obligation to close the
merger will not be satisfied. If SCM decides to waive this
closing condition and the Merger is consummated without the
consent of the two other general partners of Keyboards, SCM and
Hirsch face the risk of litigation being brought by these two
general partners relating to the settlement agreement and the
amount of royalties to which Keyboards is entitled. There is no
guarantee that SCM and Hirsch will prevail in any such
litigation and SCMs results of operations may be
materially harmed as a result of the litigation, in addition to
diverting managements attention away from operations to
attend to the litigation.
For a more detailed discussion of the settlement agreement and
the letters of understanding see the sections entitled
Certain Agreements Related to the Merger
Settlement Agreement and Certain Agreements Related
to the Merger Keyboards and Networks Letters of
Understanding in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus.
During the years ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
Hirsch paid approximately $1.0 million, $1.0 million
and $0.9 million, respectively, in royalties to Keyboards
and Networks, on an aggregate basis. At November 30, 2008,
2007 and 2006, Hirsch had a royalty payable of approximately
$0.3 million, $0.4 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, to Keyboards and Networks on an aggregate basis.
Need for
any Government Approval of Principal Products or Services;
Status
The U.S. federal government represents a significant
portion of Hirsch revenues. Obtaining, or failing to obtain,
certain government approvals or certifications could materially
affect, positively or negatively, Hirschs results in those
market segments for which such approvals or certifications are
customary or required. Examples of certifications or approvals
that may be important for Hirsch to achieve and maintain include
National Institute of
157
Standards and Technology (NIST); Federal Information Processing
Standards (FIPS); 201 Approved Products List (APL); NIST FIPS
140; NIST FIPS 197; Transportation Security Administration
(TSA); Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC);
Qualified Products List (QPL); United Laboratories (UL) 294,
1076, 2050; and Director of Central Intelligence Directive
No. 6/9 (DCID 6/9) for Sensitive Compartmented Information
Facilities (SCIF).
Certain Hirsch products already have obtained the desired
certifications, but as newer versions of these products are
released, each may require recertification. Some products are
currently in the review process for such approvals or
certifications, while some products will begin the submittal
process in the coming months. New products in development may
require certifications or approvals. The government may
introduce new requirements that some Hirsch products will be
required to meet. In addition, Hirschs General Services
Administration Contract (#GS-07F-7733C) will be due for renewal
August 31, 2010.
Hirsch believes that it is knowledgeable regarding the
requirements necessary to achieve or obtain a number government
certifications and approvals, as Hirsch has sold its products to
the U.S. government during most of its 27 years in
business. Hirsch anticipates current and future products that
benefit significantly from certification or approval will
obtain, achieve and maintain the desired approvals in a timely
fashion.
Hirsch believes the government requirements are a significant
barrier to entry that hinders many of its potential competitors
from competing effectively in this marketplace. Hirsch believes
that on balance, Hirsch will be helped, not hurt, by current and
future government certification and approval requirements.
Effect of
Existing or Probable Governmental Regulations on the
Business
There exist a substantial number of regulations that affect
businesses in the manufacturing industry and employers in
California, such as tax regulations, the Fair Employment Act and
Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA)
regulations. However, these regulations are not extraordinary,
nor their applicability unique to Hirsch. Thus, Hirsch believes
there are currently no existing or probable government
regulations applicable to it that will materially affect its
results.
Costs and
Effects of Compliance with Environmental Laws
Hirsch believes that compliance with federal, state and local
environmental regulations will not have a material adverse
effect on Hirschs financial position or results of
operations.
Research
and Development Investment
Hirsch spent approximately $0.7 million, $0.8 million
and $3.3 million on research and development and testing
during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006, 2007, and
2008. The significant
ramp-up
during fiscal year 2008 was due to the acceleration of
development of new products, in particular, a next-generation
line of controllers, readers and security management software
that better addresses the requirements of, and appeals to, the
IT personnel who increasingly are responsible for selecting
access control suppliers. All of the aforementioned research and
development efforts have been expensed and were not borne
directly by customers.
Employees
As of November 30, 2008, Hirsch employed 86 full-time
and zero part-time individuals. Hirsch has never experienced any
work stoppage, and no Hirsch employee is represented by a labor
organization or is party to any collective bargaining
arrangements. Hirsch considers employee relations to be
excellent.
Description
of Property
Hirsch is a party to lease agreements for the two offices it
rents. The main office, training center and manufacturing plant
is located at 1900 Carnegie Ave., Building B, Santa Ana, CA
92705 USA. The lease expires on November 30, 2012.
Hirschs East Coast office is located at 11951 Freedom
Drive, Suite 1357, Reston, VA 20190 USA. The lease expires
on February 28, 2010.
158
Legal
Proceedings
Hirsch is not a party to any pending legal proceeding, nor is
Hirschs property the subject of a pending legal
proceeding, that is not in the ordinary course of business or
otherwise material to the financial condition of the Hirsch
business.
159
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
The following discussion and analysis of Hirsch
Electronics financial condition and results of operations
should be read together with Selected Historical and Pro
Forma Combined Financial Data Selected Historical
Financial Data of Hirsch and the Hirsch Electronics
financial statements and related notes as well as the risk
factors set forth under the caption Risks Relating to the
Hirsch Business appearing elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Overview
Hirsch manufactures high security access control and security
management systems for the worldwide government, commercial and
industrial markets. Hirsch was founded in 1981, aiming to bring
to market a secure keypad, which scrambled the
digits on a telephone-like keypad so they came up in a different
position every time, thus creating a secure access device. The
patented
ScramblePad®
device launched Hirsch as a supplier to the
U.S. government. Today, Hirsch markets a portfolio of
products designed to provide high security, reliability,
scalability and investment protection for systems ranging from
one door to enterprise-wide, where hundreds of doors are
connected to secure access for thousands of users. Hirschs
customer base currently includes government departments and
agencies at the federal, state and local level, and retailers,
manufacturers, hospitals, corporate enterprises, banks,
utilities, education and health care institutions and other
organizations.
Hirsch products are sold and supported through a combination of
direct and indirect channels. For the U.S. government
market, Hirschs dedicated group markets directly to
various government agencies worldwide. Hirsch maintains a
government liaison office in Washington, D.C. and has a
General Services Administration contract to simplify procurement
by state and federal agencies. Hirsch utilizes a globally
distributed network of dealers and systems integrators that
provide local expertise in needs assessment, system design,
installation and commissioning, as well as ongoing services.
Hirsch supports its dealer network through regional managers
located throughout the U.S. and Canada. Regional managers
have the technical background, industry knowledge, and product
expertise to assist the dealer installer and end user in the
selection and application of Hirsch system solutions to meet
their access control and security management needs. Hirsch
maintains separate sales staff to address its customers in
Asia/Pacific and Europe/Middle East/Africa. Hirsch also provides
technical support and training to its dealers and customers.
Approximately 65% of Hirschs sales come from dealer sales
to the commercial and industrial markets in North America; 20%
come from direct sales to the U.S. government market; and
the remaining 15% come from dealer sales outside North America,
principally Europe and Asia.
Product sales typically consist of Hirsch access control readers
or keypads, which are installed at doors and other entry points,
and one or more controllers to link and manage the functions of
the access control devices. Hirschs access control devices
are equipped with a keypad, biometric reader, card reader or a
combination of these for authentication of employees or other
personnel, and are enhanced with proprietary software that
allows users to manage and monitor information generated by or
provided to the devices. Hirschs controllers play a
critical role in managing the security of the entire access
control system, as they act as a central brain in
storing data and making decisions about who is authorized to
enter, the circumstances of entry, required proof of
authentication and related matters.
Hirschs Professional Services Group is responsible for
custom features and implementations, including the integration
of Hirschs access control systems with other information
or enterprise resource planning systems, which typically already
include databases of employees and other data that would
otherwise need to be replicated within the Hirsch access control
system. Increasingly, Hirschs customers are viewing the
integration of access control with their other corporate or
facility-wide systems, such as computer security systems or
financial systems, to be important to the efficiency and
effectiveness of their overall security plan. Revenues from
Hirschs Professional Services Group increased in fiscal
year 2008, and are expected to continue to grow in fiscal year
2009.
The desire of customers to integrate and streamline all of their
data-based systems, including access control, for greater
control and efficiency is also changing the way that purchasing
decisions are made within corporations
160
and other enterprises. The IT department is increasingly
involved in evaluating, purchasing and supporting physical
security systems. In addition to the features traditionally
desired by security director buyers, the IT executives often
demand systems that are
IP-enabled,
network-ready, low bandwidth, fault tolerant, encrypted and
digital certificate-enabled. IT buyers also require security
systems that are highly interoperable with the other systems and
databases that have converged onto the IT network, such as human
resources, provisioning, command and control, parking and
elevator systems.
To address this change in the purchasing model of its customers,
in fiscal year 2008, Hirsch initiated an aggressive program to
invest in new products that are more focused on this model.
Hirschs goal is to create products that better address the
requirements of, and appeal to, the IT personnel who
increasingly are responsible for selecting access control
suppliers, as access control is more frequently being viewed as
a part of a customers overall information network.
Hirsch believes that the shift towards an information
convergence model in the marketplace is also demonstrated by the
desire of many of its customers to integrate their physical
access control systems with their logical PC or network security
systems. Hirsch believes that the Merger has the ability to
accelerate both companies ability to provide converged
logical and physical access products to the market.
Additionally, Hirsch believes the Merger will strengthen
Hirschs ability, through its Professional Services Group,
to integrate both SCMs logical access products and its own
physical access products with other data-based systems.
Hirsch expects that the demand for greater security through
physical access control will continue to be a significant driver
of growth in its business in the future. Hirsch also believes
that its ability to provide integration services between its
physical access control systems and other data-based systems
within the enterprise is a key element of differentiation from
competitors and creates an additional opportunity for growth.
During fiscal year 2008, Hirsch enhanced its marketing, sales
and professional services resources to better position it to
address current and future market opportunities.
Hirschs sales in the U.S. government market increased
in fiscal year 2008, as some physical access control programs
established under the Homeland Security Presidential
Directive-12, initiated in 2003, received the funding required
to begin implementation. Due to its continuing investment in
product development, partnerships, and sales and marketing
activities focused on this sector, Hirsch expects that its sales
in the U.S. government market will continue to grow in
fiscal year 2009 as HSPD-12 transitions from a non-funded
mandate to budgeted procurement items. More details on this
market opportunity are presented in the Information About
Hirsch Electronics section of this document.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of results of operations and
liquidity and capital resources are based on the Hirsch
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (U.S. GAAP).
The preparation of these financial statements requires
management to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Hirsch management bases
their estimates on historical and anticipated results and trends
and on various other assumptions that they believe are
reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to
future events. These estimates form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. By their
nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
The following represents a summary of Hirschs critical
accounting policies, defined as those policies that Hirsch
management believes are: (a) the most important to the
presentation of their financial condition and results of
operations, and (b) that require managements
judgment, often as a result of the need to make estimates about
the matters that are inherently uncertain. The most critical
accounting estimates include revenue recognition, valuation of
inventories, valuation of investments, valuation of call and put
options related to Hirsch EMEA and the valuation of deferred tax
assets. Each of these policies is discussed below, as well as
the estimates and judgments involved. There are also other
policies that management considers key accounting policies;
however, these policies do not
161
meet the definition of critical accounting estimates, because
they do not generally require management to make estimates or
judgments that are difficult or subjective.
Revenue
Recognition
Hirsch derives revenue from sales of products and services.
Consistently, over 90% of revenue is from sales of hardware. The
following summarizes the major terms of the contractual
relationships with customers and the manner in which Hirsch
accounts for sales transactions.
Hardware
Revenue
Hardware revenue consists of the sale of access control hardware
including the ScramblePad products, controllers, network and
communication products and other security related hardware.
Hirsch recognizes revenue pursuant to
EITF 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
(EITF 00-21)
and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB 104). In
accordance with these revenue recognition guidelines, revenue is
recognized for a unit of accounting when all of the following
criteria are met:
|
|
|
|
|
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
|
|
|
|
delivery has occurred;
|
|
|
|
fee is fixed or determinable; and
|
|
|
|
collectability is reasonably assured.
|
Generally, product sales are not contingent upon customer
testing, approval
and/or
acceptance. Professional services revenue is not recognized
until the services have been performed, while product revenue is
recognized at time of shipment as shipping terms are typically
free on board (FOB) shipping point, as the services do not
affect the functionality of the delivered items.
Product returns have historically been insignificant and as such
are recorded when incurred
Software
Revenue
Hirsch sells various software products ranging from software
that is embedded in the hardware to add-on software that can be
sold on a stand-alone basis. Software that is embedded in the
hardware (i.e., firmware) provides a user-interface
and facilitates the functionality of the hardware. This software
cannot be sold on a stand-alone basis and is not a significant
part of sales or marketing efforts. This embedded software is
considered incidental to the hardware and is not recognized as a
separate unit of accounting apart from the hardware.
Hirsch also sells proprietary application software that is sold
as add-on software to their security hardware configurations.
This provides additional functionality to the security system,
such as integration of security access monitoring. Based on the
factors described in footnote two of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition
(SOP 97-2)
Hirsch considers this type of software to be
more-than-incidental to the hardware components in an
arrangement. This assessment is based on the fact that the
software can be sold on a stand-alone basis. Software products
that are considered more-than-incidental are treated as a
separate unit of accounting apart from the hardware and the
related software product revenue is recognized upon delivery to
the customer. Hirsch accounts for software that is
more-than-incidental in accordance with
SOP 97-2
whereby the revenue from the sale of software products is
recognized at the time the software is delivered to the
customer, provided all the revenue recognition criteria noted
above have been met, except collectability must be deemed
probable under
SOP 97-2
versus reasonably assured under SAB 104. Hirsch also
considers
EITF 03-05,
Applicability of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, to Non-Software Deliverables in an
Arrangement Containing More-Than-Incidental Software
(EITF 03-05).
Per
EITF 03-05,
if the software is considered not essential to the functionality
of the hardware, then the hardware is not considered
software related and is excluded from the scope of
SOP 97-2.
All proprietary application software sold by Hirsch is not
essential to the functionality of the security hardware. The
hardware is not dependent upon these proprietary software
products to function and the customer can fully utilize the
hardware product without any of the software products.
Therefore, in multiple-element arrangements containing hardware
and software, the hardware elements are excluded from
SOP 97-2
and
162
are accounted for in accordance with
EITF 00-21
and SAB 104 at its relative fair value as there is
objective and reliable evidence of fair value for all units of
accounting in these transactions.
Service
Revenue
Service revenue is generated from the sale of professional
services and maintenance contracts. The following describes how
Hirsch accounts for service transactions, provided all the other
revenue recognition criteria noted above have been met.
Generally, services revenue, which includes maintenance
contracts, security system integration services, system
migration and database conversion services, is recognized upon
delivery of the services. If the professional service project
includes independent milestones, revenue is recognized as
milestones are met and upon acceptance from the customer.
Maintenance revenue is generated from the sale of hardware and
software maintenance contracts. These contracts are generally
for one year terms. Maintenance revenue is recorded as deferred
revenue and is recognized as revenue ratably over the term of
the related agreement.
Multiple
Element Arrangements
Hirsch considers sales contracts that include a combination of
systems, software or services to be multiple element
arrangements. Revenue related to multiple element arrangements
is separated in accordance with
EITF 00-21
and
SOP 97-2
based on the relative fair value method. Discounts are allocated
only to the delivered elements. Fair values are determined by
examining the prices charged for when the elements are sold
separately. Undelivered elements generally include maintenance
contract revenue as other professional services are typically
sold separately from the hardware sales.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out) or market, and consist primarily of raw materials,
work-in-process
and finished goods. Market is determined by comparison with
recent sales or net realizable value. Such net realizable value
is based on managements forecasts for sales of
Hirschs products in the ensuing years. Hirsch operates in
an industry characterized by technological change. Should the
demand for Hirschs products prove to be significantly less
than anticipated, the ultimate realizable value of Hirschs
inventory could be substantially less than amounts in the
accompanying balance sheets. Hirsch periodically reviews the age
and turnover of its inventory to determine whether any inventory
has become obsolete or has declined in value and records a
charge to cost of revenues for known and estimated inventory
obsolescence.
Investments
Hirschs investments consist of cost and equity method
investments in other entities. The equity method of accounting
is used when Hirsch has the ability to exercise significant
influence in the operating and financial activities of an
investee. Significant influence is generally achieved by owning
at least 20% of the voting interest of the investee without the
ability to exercise control. Under the equity method, original
investments are recorded at cost and adjusted by Hirschs
share of undistributed earnings or losses of these entities.
Nonmarketable investments in which Hirsch has less than a 20%
interest and in which it does not have the ability to exercise
significant influence over the investee are initially carried at
cost, as management believes it is not practicable to estimate
fair value of this investment. An impairment charge is
recognized on both equity method and cost method investments
when factors indicate that a decrease in value of the investment
has occurred which is other than temporary.
Valuation
of call and put options related to Hirsch EMEA
Effective December 1, 2007, Hirsch adopted
SFAS No. 157 except as it applies to those
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities within the
scope of FSP
No. 157-b.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair
value.
In 2006, Hirsch purchased 25% of the outstanding stock in Hirsch
EMEA (EMEA), which included a call option and a put
option to purchase the remaining outstanding shares of EMEA.
Since EMEA is a privately held company with no observable inputs
to measure fair value, the options were valued using the
Black-Scholes
163
American option model. The inputs to the option pricing model
were estimated by management and include the value of EMEA, the
estimated volatility of its common stock, risk free rate of
return and expected term of the options. Hirsch entered into a
Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated December 15, 2008,
for the purchase of the approximately 70.6% of the outstanding
shares of capital stock of EMEA not already owned by Hirsch.
This transaction closed on December 15, 2008 and EMEA is
now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hirsch.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
using the liability method. Under this method, the company
provides for deferred income taxes to reflect the tax
consequences in future years for the differences between the
amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial
reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes
using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Hirsch management currently
believes that a valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets
is not required based on an assessment of the likelihood of
their realization. In reaching our conclusion, we evaluated
certain relevant criteria including deferred tax liabilities
that can be used to offset deferred tax assets, estimates of
future taxable income of appropriate character within the
carry-forward period available under the tax law, and tax
planning strategies. Our judgments regarding future taxable
income may change due to market conditions, changes in tax laws,
and other factors. These changes, if any, may require material
adjustments to these deferred tax assets, possibly resulting in
a reduction in the value of the deferred tax assets, if it is
determined that their value is impaired, resulting in a
reduction in net income or an increase in net loss in the period
when such determinations are made.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Fair
Value Measurement
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB), issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurement. SFAS No. 157 provides a framework
that clarifies the fair value measurement objective within GAAP
and its application under the various accounting standards where
fair value measurement is allowed or required. Under
SFAS No. 157, fair value refers to the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
in the market in which the reporting entity transacts.
SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value
should be based on the assumptions market participants would use
when pricing the asset or liability and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority
to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to
unobservable data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value
measurements to be separately disclosed by level within the fair
value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in
February 2008, FASB Staff Position, or FSP,
No. 157-b,
Effective Date of Statement 157, was issued which delayed
the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The FSP
partially defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
Effective December 1, 2007, Hirsch adopted
SFAS No. 157 except as it applies to those
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities within the
scope of FSP
No. 157-b.
The partial adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a
material impact on Hirschs financial position and results
of operations. Hirsch is currently assessing the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities and has not yet determined
the impact that the adoption will have on its financial position
and results of operations.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP,
No. FAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When The
Market for That Asset Is Not Active, to clarify the
application of the provisions of SFAS 157 in an inactive
market and how an entity would determine fair value in an
inactive market.
FSP 157-3
is effective immediately and applies to our November 30,
2008 financial statements. The application of the provisions of
FSP 157-3
did not materially impact Hirschs financial statements.
164
Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 provides an option to
report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value.
GAAP has required different measurement attributes for different
assets and liabilities that can create artificial volatility in
earnings. SFAS No. 159 attempts to mitigate this type
of accounting-induced volatility by enabling companies to report
related assets and liabilities at fair value, which would likely
reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for
hedge accounting. SFAS No. 159 also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
comparisons between companies that choose different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities.
SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. Hirsch has elected not to exercise
the option to report selected financial assets and liabilities
at fair value as provided for under SFAS No. 159,
accordingly, there is no impact on Hirschs financial
position and results of operations.
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN No. 48). This interpretation
clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 109.
Specifically, FIN No. 48 clarifies the application of
SFAS No. 109 by defining a criterion that an
individual tax position must meet for any part of the benefit of
that position to be recognized in an enterprises financial
statements. Additionally, FIN No. 48 provides guidance
on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods of income taxes, as
well as the required disclosure and transition. FIN 48
specifies that the evaluation of the tax position is a two-step
process: 1) Recognition: determining whether it is
more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon
examination, including resolution of any related appeals or
litigation process, and 2) Measurement: a tax position that
meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured
to determine that amount of benefit that is greater than
50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as
the largest amount of tax benefits that is greater than
50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement with a taxing authority. This interpretation is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting
principle to be recorded as an adjustment to the beginning
balance of retained earnings. However, in February 2008, FSP
No. FIN 48-2
was issued to delay the effective date of FIN No. 48
for certain nonpublic enterprises to the annual financial
statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2007, (applied as of the beginning of the enterprises
fiscal year). Hirsch is currently evaluating the requirements of
FIN No. 48 and has not yet determined if the adoption
of FIN No. 48 will have a significant impact on
Hirschs financial statements.
Business
Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)). Under
SFAS No. 141(R), an entity is required to recognize
the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual
contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value
on the acquisition date. It further requires that
acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the
acquisition and expensed as incurred; restructuring costs
generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition
date; and changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the
measurement period be recognized as a component of provision for
income taxes. In addition, acquired in-process research and
development, or IPR&D, is capitalized as an intangible
asset and amortized over its estimated useful life. The
provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) are to be applied
prospectively to business combinations with acquisition dates on
or after the beginning of an entitys fiscal year that
begins on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption
prohibited. The adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will
change our accounting treatment for business combinations on a
prospective basis beginning December 1, 2009. Hirsch is
currently assessing SFAS No. 141R and has not yet
determined the impact that the adoption will have on its
financial position and results of operations.
Useful
Life of Intangible Assets
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.
FSP
No. FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used
165
to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. Hirsch is required to adopt FSP
No. FAS 142-3
effective at the beginning of 2010. The adoption of FSP
No. FAS 142-3
is not expected to have a material impact on Hirschs
financial statements.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB and
the AICPA did not or are not believed by management to have a
material impact on Hirschs present or future financial
statements.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth Hirsch annual net revenue, gross
profit, gross profit margin and year-to-year change in revenue
for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(Dollars in thousands; percentages unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
to 2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
to 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
23,042
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
21,990
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,883
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
12,026
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
11,627
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
11,198
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
Revenue
Fiscal
Year 2008 Net Revenue Compared with Fiscal Year 2007 Net
Revenue
Net revenue for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2008 was
$23.0 million, up $1.0 million, or 5% from
$22.0 million in fiscal year 2007. This increase was due
primarily to higher sales of professional services, as well as
higher sales of Hirsch products.
During 2008, the majority of Hirschs revenue continued to
come from sales to a variety of customers in the North American
commercial and industrial markets, including retailers,
refineries, utility plants and food processing facilities.
Growth in revenue was primarily a result of increased service
revenues due to investments in personnel of Hirschs
Professional Services Group, as well as higher sales to the
U.S. government market, as funding for homeland security
programs was made available to affected agencies.
Fiscal
Year 2007 Net Revenue Compared with Fiscal Year 2006 Net
Revenue
Net revenue for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 was
$22.0 million, up $1.1 million, or 5% from
$20.9 million in fiscal year 2006. During 2007, the
majority of Hirschs revenue continued to come from sales
to a variety of customers in the commercial and industrial
markets in North America. Growth in revenues primarily came from
higher sales to commercial and industrial customers in Europe,
as well as higher sales to the U.S. government market at
the end of the fiscal year, as homeland security funding became
available.
Gross
Profit
Hirschs gross profit reflects both the effect of cost of
goods sold and royalties, and has historically been relatively
stable from period to period, primarily due to relative
constancy in the mix and pricing of products over time. Changes
in gross profit in the periods presented are primarily the
result of a higher proportion of cost of goods sold, as the
proportion of royalties has remained constant.
Gross profit for fiscal year 2008 was $12.0 million, or 52%
of revenue; gross profit for fiscal year 2007 was
$11.6 million, or 53% of revenue; and gross profit for
fiscal year 2006 was $11.2 million, or 54% of revenue.
Factors that could affect gross profit in the future include
competition, the volume of sales in any given quarter, product
configuration and mix, the availability of new products and the
cost and availability of components. Any one of these factors
could create more variability in Hirsch gross profit than has
historically been the case.
166
Operating
Expenses
Research
and Development
Research and development (R&D) expenses consist primarily
of employee compensation and, during fiscal year 2008,
consulting fees for the development of prototype products.
R&D costs are primarily related to software, hardware and
firmware development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(Dollars in thousands; percentages unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
to 2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
to 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
$
|
3,310
|
|
|
|
324
|
%
|
|
$
|
780
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
R&D expenses in fiscal year 2008 were $3.3 million,
representing 14% of revenue, which was an increase of 324% from
$0.8 million, which represented 4% of revenues in fiscal
year 2007. R&D expenses of $0.8 million in fiscal year
2007 increased 7% from $0.7 million, which represented 3%
of total revenues in fiscal year 2006. The significant increase
in fiscal year 2008 compared with the prior year was the result
of the decision by management to initiate an investment program
to develop new products that address Hirschs
customers changing requirements for solutions that can be
integrated across all data-based systems within the enterprise,
and the engagement of consulting services to expedite this
development.
Hirsch expects to continue to make significant investments to
enhance its product offerings using external consulting
resources, during the first half of fiscal year 2009, after
which R&D expenses are expected to return to pre-2008
levels.
Selling,
Marketing and General and Administrative
Selling, marketing and general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses consist primarily of employee compensation for the
sales, marketing and general and administrative functions,
expenses related to sales support, technical support, training
and market development, as well as general facilities
expenditures and professional fees arising from legal, auditing
and other consulting services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(Dollars In thousands; percentages unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
to 2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
to 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
$
|
9,576
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,055
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,416
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
In fiscal year 2008, SG&A expenses were $9.6 million,
or 42% of revenue, compared with $8.1 million, or 37% of
revenue in fiscal year 2007, an increase of 19%. The increase
was primarily due to higher general and administrative expenses
related to legal and other fees associated with the Merger with
SCM; higher rent expense; and higher marketing expenses related
to increased personnel, market development, travel, advertising
and trade show costs; and higher sales expenses related to
increased staffing for professional services as well as higher
sales commissions paid.
In fiscal year 2007, SG&A expenses increased 9% from
$7.4 million in fiscal year 2006, which represented 36% of
revenue. The increase primarily resulted from higher sales
expenses related to increased staffing in sales, and technical
support, as well as higher sales commissions and advertising
costs.
SG&A expenses are expected to continue to increase in 2009
as Hirsch adds personnel in marketing to address new market
opportunities.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets was
$0.1 million in fiscal year 2008, $0.2 million in
fiscal year 2007 and $0.1 million in fiscal year 2006.
167
Other
(Loss) Income
Other (loss) income consists of interest income and other
expense. Interest income consists of interest earned on invested
cash.
Interest income resulting from cash balances was
$0.1 million in fiscal year 2008, $0.2 million in
fiscal year 2007 and $0.2 million in fiscal year 2006.
Lower interest income in fiscal year 2008 compared to fiscal
year 2007 primarily resulted from lower interest rates in fiscal
year 2008. Higher interest income in fiscal year 2007 compared
with fiscal year 2006 primarily resulted from higher cash
balances and higher interest rates.
Other expense in fiscal year 2008 consists of impairment loss on
equity investments of $0.4 million due to an other than
temporary decline in the value of investments, and other expense
of $0.5 million resulting from the change in value of a
put-option derivative liability included in the equity
investment purchase agreement.
Income
Taxes
In the fiscal year 2008 a tax benefit of $0.7 million was
recorded, resulting from pre-tax loss realized during the fiscal
year 2008 year. The tax benefit primarily related to
U.S. federal and state taxes.
Provisions for income taxes of $1.1 million and
$1.1 million were recorded in fiscal year 2007 and 2006,
respectively, primarily resulting from U.S. federal and
state taxes.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of November 30, 2008, Hirschs working capital,
which Hirsch has defined as current assets less current
liabilities, was $8.8 million, compared to
$9.3 million as of November 30, 2007, a decrease of
approximately $0.5 million. Current assets increased by
$0.5 million, mainly resulting from an income tax
receivable of $1.0 million, an increase in deferred tax
assets of $0.1 million and an increase in inventories of
$0.3 million, partly offset by a reduction in accounts
receivable of $0.9 million and lower cash and
cash-equivalents of $0.1 million. Current liabilities
increased by $1.0 million, primarily resulting from an
increase in accounts payable of $0.5 million, valuation of
a put-option derivative of $0.5 million, and higher other
accrued liabilities of $0.4 million, partly offset by a
reduction in income tax payables of $0.3 million.
In fiscal year 2008, cash and cash equivalents decreased by
$0.1 million, resulting from $0.3 million used in
operating activities and $0.1 million used in investing
activities, offset by positive cash generation of
$0.3 million from financing activities.
Cash used in operating activities of $0.3 million was
primarily due to a net loss of $1.0 million and a negative
cash flow adjustment for deferred income taxes of
$0.3 million, offset by adjustments for non-cash charges
for depreciation and amortization, change in liability of a
put-option derivative, and an impairment of investments,
totaling $1.0 million.
Cash used in investing activities of $0.1 million primarily
related to purchases of property and equipment.
Cash provided by financing activities of $0.3 million
resulted from the issuance of common stock of $0.2 million
related to the exercise of stock options and warrants and from
$0.1 million from proceeds from issuance of common stock
and the collection of notes receivable for common stock. At
November 30, 2008, Hirschs outstanding stock options
and warrants as a percentage of outstanding shares was 2.7%,
compared to 3.1% at November 30, 2007.
During fiscal year 2008, Hirsch used $0.1 million in cash.
Hirsch currently expects that its current capital resources and
available borrowings should be sufficient to meet Hirschs
operating and capital requirements through at least the end of
2009.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Hirsch has not entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, or
issued guarantees to third parties.
168
Contractual
Obligations
The following summarizes expected cash requirements for
contractual lease obligations as of November 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
$
|
1,914
|
|
|
$
|
487
|
|
|
$
|
941
|
|
|
$
|
486
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
There have been no changes in and Hirsch has had no
disagreements with its accountants with respect to its
accounting and financial disclosure.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign
Currencies
Hirsch transacts business predominantly denominated in
U.S. dollars and accordingly, is not materially subject to
exposure from adverse movements in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Hirsch had no foreign currency exchange gains and losses during
the fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Fixed
Income Investments
Hirsch does not use derivative financial instruments in its
investment portfolio. Hirsch does, however, limit its exposure
to interest rate and credit risk by strictly monitoring its
fixed income portfolio. The fixed income portfolio is solely
invested in short-term direct government obligations, such as
U.S. Treasury bills, that are backed by the full faith and
credit of the U.S. government. At the present time, the
maximum duration of any investment in Hirschs portfolio is
limited to less than six months. Due to the limited duration and
credit risk criteria Hirsch has established, Hirschs
exposure to market and credit risk is not expected to be
material.
At November 30, 2008, Hirsch had $4.9 million in cash
and cash equivalents. Based on its cash and cash equivalents as
of November 30, 2008, a hypothetical 10% change in interest
rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not be
expected to materially affect the fair value of Hirschs
financial instruments that are exposed to changes in interest
rates.
At November 30, 2007, Hirsch had $5.0 million in cash
and cash equivalents. Based on its cash and cash equivalents as
of November 30, 2007, a hypothetical 10% change in interest
rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not
materially affect the fair value of Hirschs financial
instruments that are exposed to changes in interest rates.
169
DESCRIPTION
OF SCM MICROSYSTEMS CAPITAL STOCK
Authorized
Capital
As of February 11, 2009, the authorized capital stock of
SCM consists of 40,000,000 shares of common stock,
$0.001 par value, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, $0.001 par value.
Common
Stock
As of February 11, 2009, there were 15,743,515 shares
of SCM common stock outstanding held of record by approximately
55 stockholders. Holders of SCM common stock are entitled
to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by the
stockholders. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to
any outstanding SCM preferred stock, the holders of SCM common
stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as
may be declared from time to time by SCMs board of
directors out of funds legally available therefor. In the event
of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of SCM, the holders
of SCM common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets
remaining after payment of liabilities, subject to prior
liquidation rights of SCM preferred stock, if any, then
outstanding. The SCM common stock has no preemptive or
conversion rights or other subscription rights. There are no
redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the SCM
common stock. All outstanding shares of SCM common stock are
fully paid and non-assessable, and the shares of SCM common
stock to be outstanding upon consummation of the offering will
be fully paid and non-assessable.
Preferred
Stock
As of February 11, 2009, 10,000,000 shares of
undesignated SCM preferred stock were authorized, and no shares
outstanding. SCMs board of directors has the authority to
issue the shares of SCM preferred stock in one or more series
and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions
granted to or imposed upon any unissued shares of preferred
stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series
and the designations of such series, without any further vote or
action by the stockholders. Although it presently has no
intention to do so, SCMs board of directors, without
stockholder approval, can issue preferred stock with voting and
conversion rights which could adversely affect the voting power
of the holders of SCM common stock. The issuance SCM preferred
stock may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a
change in control of SCM.
Warrants
As of February 11, 2009, no warrants to purchase shares of
SCM common stock were outstanding. For a discussion of the
common stock purchase warrants to be issued as part of the
Merger, see the section entitled, Certain Agreements
Related to the Merger Warrants.
Rights
Agent; Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company is the
transfer agent and registrar for SCMs common stock, and
rights agent in connection with the rights agreement, as
amended, between SCM and American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company. See the section entitled Certain
Agreements Related to the Merger Amendment to Rights
Agreement.
170
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS OF SCM MICROSYSTEMS
The following table and the related notes present information
with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of SCM common
stock as of February 11, 2009 by (i) each current
director and named executive officer of SCM, (ii) each
person or group who is known to the management of SCM to be the
beneficial owner of more than 5% of all shares of SCM voting
securities outstanding as of February 11, 2009 and
(iii) all current directors and current executive officers
of SCM, as a group.
Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and
subject to applicable community property laws, SCM believes that
each of the stockholders named in the table below has sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated
as beneficially owned.
As of February 11, 2009, there were 15,743,515 shares
of SCM common stock issued and outstanding. After the Merger,
there are expected to be 25,154,985 shares of SCM common
stock issued and outstanding. Shares of SCM common stock subject
to options and warrants that are currently exercisable or are
exercisable within 60 days of February 11, 2009 are
treated as outstanding and beneficially owned by the person
holding them for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of that person, but are not treated as outstanding for
the purpose of computing the percentage of beneficial ownership
of any other shareholder. The figures in this paragraph and on
the tables below assume no exercise or termination of any
options to purchase SCM common stock, no exercise of any of the
options or warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock, termination
of all options to purchase Hirsch common stock at the effective
time of the Merger and conversion of the Hirsch common stock and
warrants to purchase shares of common stock into shares of SCM
common stock and warrants to purchase SCM common stock in
connection with the Merger. The warrants for SCM common stock to
be issued in connection with the Merger will not be exercisable
within 60 days after the Merger and are therefore not
reflected on the table below.
Unless specified otherwise below, the mailing address for each
individual, officer or director is
c/o SCM Microsystems,
Inc., Oskar-Messter-Str. 13, 85737 Ismaning, Germany.
171
Shares of
SCM Common Stock Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Merger
|
|
Following the Merger
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Approximate
|
|
Number of
|
|
Approximate
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Lincoln Vale European Partners Master Fund, LP(1)
|
|
|
1,545,692
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,545,692
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
1414 Avenue of the Americas
55 Old Bedford Road
Lincoln, MA 01773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royce & Associates, LLC(2)
|
|
|
1,287,980
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,287,980
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
1414 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc.(3)
|
|
|
1,165,559
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,165,559
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Palisades West, Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, Texas 78746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ayman Ashour/Bluehill ID AG(4)
|
|
|
796,194
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
900,194
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
Dufourstrasse 121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Gallen, Switzerland CH-9001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Hans Liebler(5)
|
|
|
1,554,025
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,554,025
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Steven Humphreys(6)
|
|
|
116,944
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
116,944
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Stephan Rohaly(7)
|
|
|
118,290
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
118,290
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Manfred Mueller(8)
|
|
|
103,805
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
103,805
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Werner Koepf(9)
|
|
|
63,831
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
63,831
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Simon Turner(10)
|
|
|
54,450
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
54,450
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. Hagen Hultzsch(11)
|
|
|
38,750
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
38,750
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Felix Marx(12)
|
|
|
25,787
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
25,787
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Eang Sour Chhor(13)
|
|
|
11,666
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
11,666
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
(9 persons)(14)
|
|
|
2,087,548
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,087,548
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates ownership of less than one percent. |
|
(1) |
|
Based on information provided by Lincoln Vale European Partners
Master Fund, LP, to SCM subsequent to Lincoln Vale European
Partners Master Fund, LPs filing of a Schedule 13D on
January 4, 2008, in which Lincoln Vale European Partners
Master Fund , LP disclosed it beneficially owned
1,434,230 shares of SCM common stock. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A
filed with the SEC on January 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A
filed with the SEC on February 9, 2009. Dimensional
Fund Advisors LP (Dimensional), an investment
advisor registered under Section 203 of the Investment
Advisors Act of 1940, furnishes investment advice to four
investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, and serves as investment manager to certain other
commingled group trusts and separate accounts. These investment
companies, trusts and accounts are the Funds. In its
role as investment advisor or manager, Dimensional possesses
investment
and/or
voting power over the securities of the Issuer described in this
schedule that are owned by the Funds, and may be deemed to be
the beneficial owner of the shares of the Issuer held by the
Funds. However, all securities reported in this schedule are
owned by the Funds. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership
of such securities. In addition, the filing of this
Schedule 13G shall not be construed as an admission that
the reporting person or any of its affiliates is the beneficial
owner of any securities covered by this Schedule 13G for
any other purposes than Section 13(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13D
filed with the SEC by Bluehill ID AG on January 2, 2009,
Bluehill ID AG held 796,194 shares of SCM common stock.
Ayman Ashour is the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Bluehill ID AG and may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the
shares held by |
172
|
|
|
|
|
Bluehill. Additionally, Mr. Ashour directly owns
52,000 shares of Hirsch common stock and an affiliate of
Mr. Ashour, Newton International Management, LLC, owns a
warrant to purchase 3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock
and, in connection with Mr. Ashours service as a
director of Hirsch in 2008, following the Merger,
Mr. Ashour will be granted a warrant to purchase a number
of shares of SCM common stock equivalent to an additional
3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock. Mr. Ashour may be
deemed to be a beneficial owner of the warrants held by Newton
International Management, LLC. The shares of Hirsch common stock
and warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock held by
Mr. Ashour and his affiliate are expected to be converted
into shares of SCM common stock and warrants to purchase shares
of SCM common stock in connection with the Merger. Because the
warrants to purchase SCM common stock are not exercisable for
three years following the Merger, they are not reflected in the
Following the Merger columns of the table above.
Ayman Ashour served as a director of Hirsch from April 20,
2007 until his resignation as a director of Hirsch on
November 17, 2008. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Includes options to purchase 8,333 shares of SCM common stock
exercisable within 60 days. Dr. Liebler is a founder
and member of the investment committee of Lincoln Vale European
Partners Master Fund, LP. As a result of his affiliation with
Lincoln Vale European Partners Master Fund, LP, Dr. Liebler
may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the shares held by
Lincoln Vale European Partners Master Fund, LP and may have
shared voting and investment power with respect to such shares.
Dr. Liebler disclaims beneficial ownership of or any
pecuniary interest in such shares. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Includes options to purchase 65,165 shares of SCM common stock
exercisable within 60 days. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Includes options to purchase 97,037 shares of SCM common stock
exercisable within 60 days. |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Includes options to purchase 84,858 shares of SCM common stock
exercisable within 60 days. |
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Includes options to purchase 23,750 shares of SCM common stock
exercisable within 60 days. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Includes options to purchase 48,750 shares of SCM common stock
exercisable within 60 days. |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Consists options to purchase of 38,750 shares of SCM common
stock exercisable within 60 days. |
|
|
|
(12) |
|
Consists options to purchase of 25,787 shares of SCM common
stock exercisable within 60 days. |
|
|
|
(13) |
|
Consists options to purchase of 11,666 shares of SCM common
stock exercisable within 60 days. Mr. Chhor resigned
from his position at SCM on February 6, 2009, effective
June 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
(14) |
|
Includes an aggregate of 404,096 options exercisable within
60 days. |
173
PRINCIPAL
SHAREHOLDERS OF HIRSCH ELECTRONICS
The following table and the related notes present information
with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of Hirsch
common stock as of February 10, 2009 by (i) each
current director and named executive officer of Hirsch,
(ii) each person or group who is known to the management of
Hirsch to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of all shares
of Hirsch voting securities outstanding as of February 10,
2009 and (iii) all current directors and current executive
officers of Hirsch, as a group.
As of February 10, 2009, there were 4,705,735 shares
of Hirsch common stock issued and outstanding. Shares of Hirsch
common stock subject to options and warrants that are currently
exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days of
February 10, 2009 are also treated as outstanding and
beneficially owned by the person holding them for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of that person, but are not
treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage of beneficial ownership of any other shareholder. The
figures below assume no exercise of any of the options or
warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock and termination of all
options to purchase Hirsch common stock at the effective time of
the Merger, and conversion of the Hirsch common stock and
warrants to purchase shares of Hirsch common stock into shares
of SCM common stock and warrants to purchase SCM common stock in
connection with the Merger. Warrants for SCM common stock issued
in connection with the Merger are not exercisable within
60 days and are therefore not reflected on the table below.
Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and
subject to voting agreements entered into by executive officers
and directors of Hirsch and applicable community property rules,
Hirsch believes that each of the shareholders named in the table
below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the
shares indicated as beneficially owned.
Unless specified otherwise below, the mailing address for each
individual, officer or director is
c/o Hirsch
Electronics Corporation, 1900 Carnegie Ave., Building B, Santa
Ana, CA 92705.
Shares of
Common Stock Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Merger
|
|
|
Following the Merger
|
|
|
|
(Hirsch Common Stock)
|
|
|
(SCM Common Stock)
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Mary F. Taylor(7)
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Lawrence W. Midland(2)
|
|
|
628,800
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,257,600
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Eugene Y. K. Mak, M.D.(3)
|
|
|
174,081
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
304,162
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Douglas J. Morgan(4)
|
|
|
136,104
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
266,208
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Maury Polner, C.P.A.(5)
|
|
|
98,000
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
152,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert Zivney(1)(6)
|
|
|
26,471
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
32,942
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John Piccininni
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert Beliles
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ayman Ashour(8)
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
900,194
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)
|
|
|
1,133,456
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates ownership of less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
The Prior to the Merger figure includes 10,000
options to purchase Hirsch common stock. At the closing of the
Merger, each option to purchase Hirsch common stock outstanding
and unexercised immediately prior to the closing of the Merger
will be terminated and cancelled, and no entity will assume or
be bound to any obligation with respect to such options. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 619,800 shares held by the Midland Family
Trust Est. Jan 29, 2002, 2,600 shares of Hirsch common
stock held by Mr. Midland as custodian for Ashley Marie
Midland, 3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock held as
custodian for Alison Midland, 2,000 shares of Hirsch common
stock held as custodian for Taylor Ann Midland and
1,400 shares of Hirsch common stock held as custodian for
Madison Kathleen Midland. Following the Merger, Mr. Midland
will also beneficially own 628,800 warrants to purchase SCM
common |
174
|
|
|
|
|
stock received in exchange for the Hirsch common stock not
exercisable for three years following the Merger and are not
included in the Following the Merger columns in the
table above. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes 80,333 shares held by The Mak Family
Trust Dtd
11/27/79 and
71,748 shares held by PTC Cust IRA fbo Eugene Y. K. Mak.
The Prior to the Merger figure includes warrants to
purchase 22,000 shares of Hirsch common stock. Following
the Merger, in connection with Dr. Maks service as a
director of Hirsch in 2008, Dr. Mak will be granted
warrants to purchase a number of shares of SCM common stock
equivalent to 3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock. The
shares of Hirsch common stock and warrants to purchase Hirsch
common stock held by Dr. Mak are expected to be converted
into shares of SCM common stock and warrants to purchase shares
of SCM common stock in connection with the Merger. Because the
warrants to purchase SCM common stock are not exercisable for
three years following the Merger, such warrants are not included
in the Following the Merger columns in the table
above. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes 25,000 shares held by Performance Strategies Inc.
Profit Sharing Plan & Trust. The Prior to the
Merger figure includes warrants to purchase
3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock. Following the Merger,
in connection with Mr. Morgans service as a director
of Hirsch in 2008, Mr. Morgan will be granted warrants to
purchase a number of shares of SCM common stock equivalent to
3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock. The shares of Hirsch
common stock and warrants to purchase Hirsch common stock held
by Mr. Morgan are expected to be converted into shares of
SCM common stock and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common
stock in connection with the Merger. Because the warrants to
purchase SCM common stock are not exercisable for three years
following the Merger, such warrants are not included in the
Following the Merger columns in the table above. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Polners shares are held by Maury Polner and
Vivian A. Polner, as Co-Trustees of The Polner Living
Trust Established June 8, 2000. Mr. Polner has
shared voting and investment powers as to 76,000 shares.
The Prior to the Merger figure includes warrants to
purchase 22,000 shares of Hirsch common stock. Following
the Merger, in connection with Mr. Polners service as
a director of Hirsch in 2008, Mr. Polner will be granted
warrants to purchase a number of shares of SCM common stock
equivalent to 3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock. The
shares of Hirsch common stock and warrants to purchase Hirsch
common stock held by Mr. Polner are expected to be
converted into shares of SCM common stock and warrants to
purchase shares of SCM common stock in connection with the
Merger. Because the warrants to purchase SCM common stock are
not exercisable for three years following the Merger, such
warrants are not included in the Following the
Merger columns in the table above. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Zivney has shared voting and investment powers as to
16,471 shares of Hirsch common stock. Following the Merger,
Mr. Zivney is also expected to beneficially own 16,471
warrants to purchase SCM common stock received in exchange for
the Hirsch common stock, which are not exercisable for three
years following the Merger and are not included in the
Following the Merger columns in the table above. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 289,000 shares held by Taylor Family Trust, Dtd
5/23/03. |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Ayman Ashour served as a director of Hirsch from April 20,
2007 until his resignation as a director of Hirsch on
November 17, 2008. The Prior to the Merger
figure includes 52,000 shares of Hirsch common stock held
directly by Mr. Ashour and warrants to purchase
3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock held by an affiliate of
Mr. Ashour, Newton International Management, LLC, of which
Mr. Ashour may be deemed to be a beneficial owner.
Following the Merger, in connection with Mr. Ashours
service as a director of Hirsch in 2008, Mr. Ashour will be
granted warrants to purchase a number of shares of SCM common
stock equivalent to 3,000 shares of Hirsch common stock.
Mr. Ashour is also the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of Bluehill ID AG. Bluehill hold 796,194 shares of SCM
common stock, of which Mr. Ashour may be deemed to be a
beneficial owner. The shares of Hirsch common stock and warrants
to purchase Hirsch common stock held by Mr. Ashour and his
affiliate are expected to be converted into shares of SCM common
stock and warrants to purchase shares of SCM common stock in
connection with the Merger. Because the warrants to purchase SCM
common stock are not exercisable for three years following the
Merger, such warrants are not included in the Following
the Merger columns in the table above. |
175
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE OFFICER
COMPENSATION
SCMs
Board of Directors
SCMs board of directors is divided into three director
classes with staggered three-year terms. Currently, SCMs
board consists of seven directors, of which three
directors serve in Class I, two directors serve in
Class II and two directors serve in Class III. The
board of directors has authorized up to eight directors.
The Board
of Directors and Management of SCM Following the
Merger
After completion of the Merger, the SCM board of directors will
consist of eight directors, including Lawrence W. Midland, who
is expected to join SCMs board of directors at the
effective time of the Merger. SCM currently anticipates that the
following individuals will serve as its board of directors
following completion of the Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Current Age
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Director Since
|
|
Werner Koepf
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
2006
|
Dr. Hagen Hultzsch
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director
|
|
2002
|
Steven Humphreys
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Director
|
|
1996
|
Dr. Hans Liebler
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Director
|
|
2008
|
Felix Marx
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
2007
|
Lawrence W. Midland
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Director
|
|
Following completion of the Merger
|
Stephan Rohaly
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Director
|
|
2007
|
Simon Turner
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
|
2000
|
Werner Koepf. Werner Koepf has served as a director of
SCM since February 2006 and as Chairman of the board of
directors since March 2007. Mr. Koepf currently is an
advisor to the venture capital firm Invision AG. From 1993 to
2002, Mr. Koepf held a variety of senior management
positions with Compaq Computer Corporation GmbH, including Vice
President and General Manager of the General Business Group from
1993 to 1999; Vice President and General Manager of Compaq
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) from 1999 to 2000; and
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman for Compaq Computer, EMEA
from 2000 to 2001. From 1989 to 1993, Mr. Koepf was
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for European Silicon
Structures SA, an ASIC manufacturer. Prior to 1993,
Mr. Koepf held various senior management positions at Texas
Instruments Inc., including Vice President and General Manager
of several divisions of the group. Mr. Koepf received a
masters degree in business administration from the
University of Munich and a bachelors degree with honors in
electrical engineering from the Technical College in St.
Poelten, Austria.
Dr. Hagen Hultzsch. Dr. Hagen Hultzsch has
served as a director of SCM since August 2002. Dr. Hultzsch
currently sits on the boards of more than 20 technology
companies and academic institutions in the U.S. and Europe,
including Radware LLC, RiT Technologies Ltd, TranSwitch
Corporation and living-e AG. From 1993 until his retirement in
2001, Dr. Hultzsch served as a member of the Board of
Management for Deutsche Telekoms technical services
division. From 1988 to 1993, he was Corporate Executive Director
for Volkswagen AG, where he was responsible for Organization and
Information systems. Dr. Hultzsch holds M.S. and Ph.D.
degrees in nuclear physics from the University of Mainz, Germany.
Steven Humphreys. Steven Humphreys has served as a
director of SCM since July 1996 and as Chairman of the board of
directors from April 2000 to March 2007. Since March 2008,
Mr. Humphreys has served as a director of ActivIdentity
Corporation, a provider of digital identity solutions. Since
October 2003, he has served as Chairman of Robotic Innovations
International, Inc., an acquirer and developer of technologies
for broad-based applications of robotics, service automation and
automated companion devices. Currently he also serves as a
director of HeadThere, Inc., a communications robotics device
company, and Ready Solar, Inc., a provider of standardized
residential solar systems. From October 2001 to October 2003, he
served as Chairman of the board and Chief Executive Officer of
ActivCard Corporation, a provider of digital identity management
software. From July 1996 to
176
October 2001, Mr. Humphreys was an executive officer of
SCM, serving as President and Chairman of the board from July
1996 until December 1996, at which time he became Chief
Executive Officer and served as President and Chief Executive
Officer until April 2000. Previously, Mr. Humphreys was
President of Caere Corporation, an optical character recognition
software and systems company. Prior to Caere, he spent ten years
with General Electric Company in a variety of positions.
Mr. Humphreys is also a director of several privately held
companies, a limited partner and advisor to several venture
capital firms and from October 2001 to December 2003 was a
director of ActivCard. Additionally, Mr. Humphreys was
elected to the school board of the Portola Valley Public School
District in 2007, and has served on the board of Summit
Preparatory Public Charter High School since 2003.
Mr. Humphreys holds a B.S. degree from Yale University and
M.S. and M.B.A. degrees from Stanford University.
Dr. Hans Liebler. Dr. Hans Liebler has served
as a director of SCM since June 2008. Since July 2006,
Dr. Liebler has served as a partner of Lincoln Vale
European Partners, an investment management company that he
co-founded which is focused on strategic long-term investments
in European small- and mid-cap companies, and which is currently
the largest single stockholder of the company. Currently, he
also serves on the investment committee of Lincoln Vale. From
September 2002 to July 2006, Dr. Liebler managed an
investment fund he had conceived for Allianz AG, applying a
private equity approach to European publicly listed companies.
Previous to this, from September 1996 to September 2002, he
worked as a management consultant for McKinsey &
Company, initially in the companys Madrid and New York
offices and subsequently as co-leader of McKinseys German
Corporate Finance practice. From 1993 to 1995, Dr. Liebler
was an investment banker for S.G. Warburg in London. Since 1998,
Dr. Liebler has also served as an adjunct professor at the
European Business School in Germany. He holds a Masters
degree in Business Administration from the University of Munich
in Germany and a Ph.D in Finance from the University of St.
Gallen in Switzerland.
Felix Marx. Felix Marx joined SCM Microsystems as Chief
Executive Officer and director in October 2007. Previously, from
2003 to November 2007, Mr. Marx held a variety of
management positions with NXP Semiconductors, a specialty
semiconductor manufacturer for the smart card industry. Most
recently, he served as General Manager of NXPs Near Field
Communication business. Prior to this, Mr. Marx served as
General Manager of NXPs Contactless & Embedded
Security business. From 2002 to 2003, Mr. Marx was a
business consultant with Team Training Austria. Prior to this,
he worked for several years in the data and voice networking
sector, where he held various sales, marketing, product
management and business line management positions with companies
including Global One Telecommunications and Ericsson. He holds a
bachelors degree in engineering from the Technical Academy
in Vienna and a Master of Advanced Studies in Knowledge
Management from Danube University in Austria.
Lawrence W. Midland. Lawrence W. Midland is expected to
join SCMs board of directors upon completion of the
Merger. Mr. Midland is currently President of Hirsch, which
he co-founded in August 1981, and for which he has served as a
director since Hirschs inception. Mr. Midland became
President and Chairman of the board of Hirsch in March 1986 and
has held those positions continuously since that time.
Mr. Midland previously served as president of several
companies which were all sold profitably, including Retirement
Inns of America, Pension Properties Trust, a California REIT,
and Pension Administrative Services. Previously Mr. Midland
also held various sales positions in investment related
activities following his employment as a field engineer with
Shell Oil Company. He holds a B.S. degree in Physics (With
Distinction) from the University of Oklahoma and an M.B.A.
degree from Pepperdine University.
Stephan Rohaly. Stephan Rohaly has served as a director
of SCM since August 2007. Mr. Rohaly joined SCM
Microsystems in March 2006 as Vice President Finance and Chief
Financial Officer. He also served as Acting Chief Executive
Officer from July 2007 to October 2007. Before joining SCM, from
February 2003 to February 2006, he was Director of Corporate
Finance at Viatris, a German pharmaceutical firm. From July 1995
to December 2002, he served as Business Unit and
Finance & Administration Director for Nike Germany.
Prior to Nike, Mr. Rohaly was Symantecs
Finance & Administration Officer for Central and
Eastern Europe. He received his MBA degree from Rice University,
and holds a Bachelor of Science and Business Administration,
Magna Cum Laude in Mathematics and Computer Information Systems
Management from Houston Baptist University.
Simon Turner. Simon Turner has served as a director of
SCM since July 2000. Since January 2009, Mr. Turner has
served as Strategic Accounts Director for PC manufacturer ACER
Group. From January 2006 to December
177
2008, Mr. Turner served as Group Sourcing Director for
consumer electronic retailer DSG international plc. From January
2002 to January 2006, Mr. Turner was Managing Director of
the PC World Group of DSG, responsible for operations at PC
World, PC World Business and Genesis Communications in the UK
and PC City in Europe. From February 1999 to January 2002,
Mr. Turner was Managing Director of PC World, a large UK
reseller of PCs and PC-related equipment. From December 1996 to
February 1999, Mr. Turner was Managing Director of Philips
Consumer Electronics, UK and Ireland. Prior to that, he also
served as Senior Vice President of Philips Media, Commercial
Director of Belling and Company and Group Marketing Manager at
Philips Consumer Electronics. Mr. Turner is also a
non-executive director of Yorkshire Building Society, which is
the UKs third largest member-owned savings and loan
institution. Mr. Turner holds a B.S. degree from the
University of Surrey.
To the knowledge of SCMs management, there are no family
relationships between any of its directors and any other of its
directors or executive officers.
Director
Independence
SCMs board of directors has reviewed the independence of
each of its directors and considered whether any director has
had a material relationship with the company or its management
that could compromise his ability to exercise independent
judgment in carrying out his duties and responsibilities. As a
result of this review, SCMs board of directors
affirmatively determined that all of its non-employee directors
are independent under the corporate governance standards of the
Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market and
Rule 10A-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act).
In connection with the determination of independence of
Dr. Hans Liebler, the board of directors considered
Dr. Lieblers relationship with the companys
largest stockholder, Lincoln Vale European Partners, of which
Dr. Liebler is a founder and member of the investment
committee. The board of directors determined that such
relationship would not compromise Dr. Lieblers
ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his
duties and responsibilities. In agreeing to serve as a member of
SCMs board of directors, Dr. Liebler must act
independently of Lincoln Vale European Partners in discharging
his fiduciary duties to stockholders of the company and also is
obligated not to disclose to Lincoln Vale European Partners or
use for his own benefit any confidential information that he may
obtain during his service on the board. Dr. Liebler
disclaims shared voting or dispositive power over any securities
held by the fund.
Compensation
of Directors
Annual
Cash Compensation
During 2008, SCMs non-employee directors were paid in the
currency of the country of their residence, using a fixed
exchange rate of 0.93 per U.S. dollar for SCMs
German-based directors and £0.63 per U.S. dollar for
SCMs UK-based director. During 2008, each non-employee
member of SCMs board of directors was eligible to receive
the following cash compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
an annual retainer of $10,000 for each member of the board,
except for the Chairman, who is eligible to receive an annual
retainer of $20,000;
|
|
|
|
additional annual retainer of $5,000 for service on the Audit
Committee of the board, except for the Chairman, who is eligible
to receive an annual retainer of $10,000;
|
|
|
|
additional annual retainer of $2,000 for service on the
Compensation or Nominating Committees of the board, except for
the Chairman of such committees, who are each eligible to
receive an annual retainer of $4,000; and
|
|
|
|
meeting fees of $1,000 for physical attendance at each board
meeting.
|
Additionally, SCM reimburses its non-employee board members for
all reasonable out-of pocket expenses incurred in the
performance of their duties as directors, which in practice
primarily consist of travel expenses associated with board or
committee meetings or with committee assignments.
178
Change
in Cash Compensation for 2009
During 2008, the Compensation Committee conducted a review of
compensation paid to SCM board members that included comparisons
of cash and equity compensation made to directors at six other
security companies, including ActivIdentity, Entrust, L-1
Identity Solutions, Secure Computing, Tumbleweed Communication
and Vasco Data Security. Based on this review, in December 2008,
the Compensation Committee approved an increase in the cash
compensation paid to the companys non-employee directors,
effective beginning in 2009. Annual cash compensation was
increased from $10,000 to $20,000 for all directors except for
the Chairman of the board, whose annual cash compensation was
increased from $20,000 to $40,000. Additionally, directors will
also receive a fee of $500 for attendance at each telephonic
board meeting lasting more than 60 minutes, whereas previously
no fees had been paid for attendance at telephonic board
meetings. All other components of cash compensation remain
unchanged for 2009.
Equity
Compensation
During 2008, each non-employee member of SCMs board of
directors was eligible to receive option awards under the terms
of the companys 2007 Stock Option Plan. Under this plan,
new members of the board receive an initial option grant to
purchase 10,000 shares of the companys common stock.
Continuing members of the board who have served for at least six
months receive an annual option grant to purchase
5,000 shares of the companys common stock, awarded on
the date of the companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Both of these option grants vest 1/12th per month over the
one-year period following the date of grant.
During 2008, each of SCMs non-employee directors, with the
exception of Dr. Liebler, received an annual grant of 5,000
options for shares of the companys common stock. All such
annual grants were made on July 1, 2008, the date of
SCMs Annual Meeting, at an exercise price of $2.91 per
share, which was the NASDAQ closing price on that day.
Dr. Liebler received an initial option grant to purchase
10,000 shares of the companys common stock upon
joining the board. His grant was made on June 2, 2008 at an
exercise price of $2.95, which was the NASDAQ closing price on
that day.
The following Director Compensation Table sets forth summary
information concerning the compensation paid to SCMs
non-employee directors in 2008 for services to the company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
in Cash
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Werner Koepf Chairman(2)
|
|
$
|
31,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,344
|
|
|
$
|
41,344
|
|
Steven Humphreys Former Chairman(3)
|
|
$
|
22,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,344
|
|
|
$
|
32,344
|
|
Dr. Hagen Hultzsch(4)
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,344
|
|
|
$
|
34,344
|
|
Dr. Hans Liebler(5)
|
|
$
|
10,500
|
|
|
$
|
7,564
|
|
|
$
|
18,064
|
|
Simon Turner(6)
|
|
$
|
29,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,344
|
|
|
$
|
39,344
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts in this column represent the dollar amount
recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with
respect to the fiscal year in accordance with SFAS 123(R).
These amounts may reflect options granted in years prior to
2008. The grant date fair value of these annual stock options
awarded to each director in 2008, other than Mr. Liebler,
is approximately $6,751. The grant date fair value of the
initial stock options awarded to Dr. Liebler is
approximately $13,154. The grant date fair value of the options
awards is calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation
model using the following assumptions: a dividend rate of zero,
an interest rate for the expected life of the option at the date
of grant, an expected option life of 4.00 years, and
volatility based on historical averages at the date of grant.
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the
period ended December 31, 2007 for more information about
how SCM accounts for stock-based compensation. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Koepf received a fee of $20,000 for his service as
Chairman of the board of directors in 2008. He also received a
fee of $2,000 for his service as a member of the Compensation
Committee and a fee of $4,000 for his service as Chairman of the
Nominating Committee during 2008. Additionally, he received a
fee of $1,000 for each physical board meeting attended,
amounting to $5,000. Mr. Koepf had 25,000 options
outstanding as of December 31, 2008, of which 22,083 were
exercisable. |
179
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Humphreys received a fee of $10,000 for his service as
a director in 2008. He also received a fee of $5,000 for his
service as a member of the Audit Committee and a fee of $2,000
for his service as a member of the Nominating Committee during
2008. Additionally, he received a fee of $1,000 for each
physical board meeting attended, amounting to $5,000.
Mr. Humphreys had 66,415 options outstanding as of
December 31, 2008, of which 63,498 were exercisable. |
|
(4) |
|
Dr. Hultzsch received a fee of $10,000 for his service as a
director in 2008. He also received $5,000 for his service as a
member of the Audit Committee and a fee of $4,000 for his
service as Chairman of the Compensation Committee during 2008.
Additionally, he received a fee of $1,000 for each physical
board meeting attended, amounting to $5,000. Dr. Hultzsch
had 40,000 options outstanding as of December 31, 2008, of
which 37,083 were exercisable. |
|
(5) |
|
Dr. Liebler joined the board of directors of SCM effective
June 1, 2008, and received a prorated fee of $5,833 for his
service as a director from June through December 2008. He also
received a prorated fee of $834 for his service as a member of
the Compensation Committee and $833 for his service as a member
of the Nominating Committee from July through December 2008.
Additionally, he received a fee of $1,000 for each physical
board meeting attended, amounting to $3,000. Dr. Liebler
had 10,000 options outstanding as of December 31, 2008, of
which 5,000 were exercisable. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Turner received a fee of $10,000 for his service as a
director in 2008. He also received $10,000 for his service as
Chairman of the Audit Committee, $2,000 for his service as a
member of the Compensation Committee and $2,000 for his service
as a member of the Nominating Committee during 2008.
Additionally, he received a fee of $1,000 for each physical
board meeting attended, amounting to $5,000. Mr. Turner had
50,000 options outstanding as of December 31, 2008, of
which 47,083 were exercisable. |
Executive
Officers
Information concerning SCMs current and, in the case of
Lawrence W. Midland, expected, future executive officers,
including their backgrounds and ages as of December 31,
2008, is set forth below. All executive officers hold their
positions for an indefinite term and serve at the pleasure of
SCMs board of directors.
To the knowledge of SCMs management, there are no family
relationships between any of SCMs executive officers and
any of its directors or other executive officers.
|
|
|
Felix Marx, 42
Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
Felix Marx has served as Chief Executive Officer and as a
director of the company since October 2007. Previously, from
2003 to October 2007, Mr. Marx held a variety of management
positions with NXP Semiconductors, a specialty semiconductor
manufacturer for the smart card industry. Most recently, he
served as General Manager of NXPs Near Field Communication
business. Prior to this, Mr. Marx served as General Manager
of NXPs Contactless & Embedded Security
business. From 2002 to 2003, Mr. Marx was a business
consultant with Team Training Austria. Prior to this, he worked
for several years in the data and voice networking sector, where
he held various sales, marketing, product management and
business line management positions with companies including
Global One Telecommunications and Ericsson. He holds a
bachelors degree in engineering from the Technical Academy
in Vienna and a Master of Advanced Studies in Knowledge
Management from Danube University in Austria. |
|
Stephan Rohaly, 44
Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Director |
|
Stephan Rohaly has served as Vice President Finance and Chief
Financial Officer since March 2006 and was named a director of
the company in August 2007. Mr. Rohaly also served as
Acting Chief Executive Officer from July 2007 to October 2007.
Before joining SCM, from February 2003 to February 2006,
Mr. Rohaly was Director of Corporate Finance at Viatris, a
German pharmaceutical firm. From July 1995 to December 2002, he
served as Business Unit and |
180
|
|
|
|
|
Finance & Administration Director for Nike Germany.
Prior to Nike, Mr. Rohaly was Symantecs
Finance & Administration Officer for Central and
Eastern Europe. He received his MBA degree from Rice University,
and holds a Bachelor of Science and Business Administration,
Magna Cum Laude in Mathematics and Computer Information Systems
Management from Houston Baptist University. |
|
|
|
Eang Sour Chhor, 44
Executive Vice President, Strategy, Marketing and Engineering |
|
Eang Sour Chhor served as Executive Vice President Strategy,
Marketing and Engineering since February 2008. In this position
he was responsible for product management and product
development. Prior to joining SCM, from March 2001 to January
2008, Mr. Chhor held a variety of management positions with
Philips Semiconductors, a diversified electronics company, and
NXP Semiconductors, a company created by Philips Semiconductors.
Most recently, he served as Senior Director, Global Key Accounts
at NXP Semiconductors, a position he held for 25 months,
and was a member of NXPs elite group of Top 150 Leaders.
Prior to this, Mr. Chhor served as General Manager of
NXPs Contactless & Embedded Security Division,
headed NXPs smart card and reader businesses and launched
NXPs Near Field Communication cooperation with Sony. Prior
to NXP, from 1998 to 2001 Mr. Chhor held a variety of
management positions with Philips Consumer Electronics.
Mr. Chhor holds a bachelors degree in electronics
engineering from the University of Technology in Cachan, France
and an MBA from HEC School of Management in Paris, France.
Mr. Chhor resigned from his position at SCM on
February 6, 2009, effective June 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
Lawrence W. Midland, 67
Executive Vice President, Hirsch business division |
|
Lawrence W. Midland, is expected to become an executive
officer of SCM upon completion of the Merger. Mr. Midland
is currently President of Hirsch, which he co-founded in August
1981, and for which he has served as a director since
Hirschs inception. Mr. Midland became President and
Chairman of the board of Hirsch in March 1986 and has held those
positions continuously since that time. Mr. Midland
previously served as president of several companies which were
all sold profitably, including Retirement Inns of America,
Pension Properties Trust, a California REIT, and Pension
Administrative Services. Previously Mr. Midland also held
various sales positions in investment related activities
following his employment as a field engineer with Shell Oil
Company. He holds a B.S. degree in Physics (With Distinction)
from the University of Oklahoma and an M.B.A. degree from
Pepperdine University. |
|
Dr. Manfred Mueller, 38
Executive Vice President, Strategic Sales and Business
Development |
|
Dr. Manfred Mueller has served as Executive Vice President,
Strategic Sales and Business Development since March 2008. He
joined SCM Microsystems in August 2000 as Director of Strategic
Business Development. From July 2002 to July 2005, he served as
Director of Strategic Marketing. He was appointed Vice President
of Strategic Business Development in July 2005. He served as
Vice President Marketing from February 2006 to April 2007, at
which time he was named Vice President Sales, EMEA. Prior to
SCM, from August 1998 to July 2000, Dr. Mueller was Product
Manager and Business Development Manager at BetaResearch GmbH,
the digital TV technology development division of the Kirch
Group. Dr. Mueller holds masters and Ph.D degrees in
Chemistry from Regensburg University in Germany and an MBA from
the Edinburgh Business School of Heriot Watt University in
Edinburgh, Scotland. |
181
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
General
Philosophy/Objectives
The primary goals of SCMs compensation program, including
its executive compensation program, are to attract and retain
employees whose abilities are critical to the companys
long-term success and to motivate employees to achieve superior
performance.
To achieve these goals, SCM attempts to:
|
|
|
|
|
offer compensation packages that are competitive regionally and
that provide a strong base of salary and benefits;
|
|
|
|
maintain a portion of total compensation at risk, particularly
in the case of its executive officers, with payment of that
portion tied to achievement of specific financial,
organizational or other performance goals; and
|
|
|
|
reward superior performance.
|
SCMs compensation program includes salary,
performance-based quarterly and annual bonuses, long-term
incentive compensation in the form of stock options and various
benefits and perquisites.
Role
of the Compensation Committee
SCMs Compensation Committee oversees all aspects of
executive compensation. The committee plays a critical role in
establishing SCMs compensation philosophy and in setting
and amending elements of the compensation package offered to its
Named Executive Officers. In 2008, SCMs Named Executive
Officers included Felix Marx, Chief Executive Officer; Stephan
Rohaly, Chief Financial Officer; Eang Sour Chhor, Executive Vice
President, Strategy, Marketing and Engineering; and Manfred
Mueller, Executive Vice President, Strategic Sales and Business
Development.
On an annual basis, or in the case of promoting or hiring an
executive officer, the Compensation Committee determines the
compensation package to be provided to SCMs Chief
Executive Officer, its other executive officers and its
directors. On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee
undertakes a review of the base salary, bonus targets and equity
awards of each of SCMs Named Executive Officers. This
review entails an evaluation of their respective compensation
based on the committees overall evaluation of their
performance toward the achievement of the companys
financial, strategic and other goals, with consideration given
to comparative executive compensation data, primarily from a
small group of companies of similar size and within a similar
segment of the security industry to SCM (as described in more
detail below). Based on its review, from time to time the
Compensation Committee has increased the salary, potential bonus
amounts
and/or
equity awards for SCMs executive officers, based upon the
performance of the executive officer, a change in scope of an
executive officers responsibilities
and/or as a
competitive practice based on a review of compensation at
companies that are similar to SCM.
Overview
of Compensation Program
SCM was originally formed in Germany in 1990 and has continued
to have an active presence in Germany and throughout Europe in
its target product markets. Since its initial public offering in
October 1997, SCMs common stock has been dually traded on
the NASDAQ Stock Market and the German exchange, previously on
the Neuer Market and now on the Prime Standard. As a result,
although SCM is a small company, it has maintained a relatively
high level of visibility in the German marketplace and financial
markets. Additionally, for the past several years the majority
of SCMs executive staff has operated from its European
headquarters in Ismaning, Germany, which has been its corporate
headquarters since late 2006. Currently, all of SCMs
executive officers operate out of its headquarters in Germany.
SCMs German corporate culture directly influences the
elements of the companys compensation program.
SCM does not employ an overall model or policy to allocate among
the compensation elements it utilizes. In general, SCM employs
cash bonuses to motivate and reward its executive officers for
the achievement of annual and
182
quarterly or other short-term performance objectives and it
employs annual grants of stock options that vest over time to
motivate and reward contributions to the companys
performance over the longer term. From time to time, however,
SCM also utilizes stock options with shorter vesting periods to
provide additional incentives for the achievement of short-term
objectives that are seen as critical to the companys
success.
SCM believes that its compensation practices, as described
below, allow the company to achieve an appropriate balance of
compensation elements for its executive officers that supports
its overall compensation program goals.
Compensation
Elements
Base
Salary
Base salary provides fixed compensation based on competitive
market practice and is intended to acknowledge and reward core
competence in the executive role relative to skills, experience
and contributions to the company. Base salaries for executives
are reviewed annually, and more frequently when there are any
changes in responsibilities.
The Compensation Committee reviewed base salary levels for
Mr. Marx, Mr. Rohaly and Dr. Mueller at the
beginning of 2008 as part of its annual review of executive
compensation. The committee did not review the salary of
Mr. Chhor, as his compensation had recently been set prior
to his joining the company in February 2008. In conducting their
reviews, the Compensation Committee (1) gave consideration
to each officers salary history with previous employers;
(2) considered informal data on salaries of executive
officers in similar positions based on general comparative data
for the technology industry from the Economic Research Institute
and Salary.com; (3) reviewed specific salary data for the
chief executive officers and chief financial officers at two
companies the Compensation Committee considered to be most
comparable in size and industry focus to the company, Vasco Data
Security and ActivIdentity; (4) relied on the professional
experience of the Compensation Committee and board members
related to compensation practices in Europe; (5) considered
the recommendations of Mr. Marx in the case of
Mr. Rohaly and Dr. Mueller, based primarily on their
respective performance reviews; (6) considered the scope of
responsibility, prior experience and past performance of each
officer; and (7) considered the specific needs of SCM at
the time and in the foreseeable future.
Based on its evaluation, in February 2008 the Compensation
Committee approved one-time incentive stock option grants for
Mr. Marx and Mr. Rohaly in lieu of annual salary
increases, in order to bring equity compensation for these
principal officers into alignment with peer companies, including
ActivIdentity and Vasco Data Security, and to better align the
interests of these executives with those of the companys
stockholders. The Compensation Committee also approved the
promotion of Dr. Mueller from Vice President Sales, EMEA to
Executive Vice President, Strategic Sales and Business
Development, and approved an increase in his annual base salary
from 150,000 to 168,000 in light of his anticipated
responsibilities for 2008. The new salary level for
Dr. Mueller was effective as of April 1, 2008.
In December 2008, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base
salary level of Mr. Marx and approved an increase in his
annual base salary from 240,000 to 280,000,
effective November 1, 2008. The increase was made based on
Mr. Marxs performance against objectives set by the
Compensation Committee related to establishing a strategic plan
for SCM and putting in place programs and resources to achieve
growth. These objectives were to create and execute a plan for
SCM to enter the contactless smart card reader market with new
products and programs and to identify and negotiate with
appropriate merger and acquisition candidates to accelerate the
companys revenue generation and increase its operating
scale.
Incentive
Cash Bonuses
Incentive cash bonuses are intended to motivate and reward
executives for their contributions towards achieving corporate
performance targets as well as specific corporate objectives
that support the companys short-term goals. During 2008,
the primary goal of the company was operating profitability,
with focus both on revenue generation and on cost and expense
containment. Therefore, incentive bonuses in 2008 were designed
to reward corporate operational performance alone.
183
On February 6, 2008, the board of directors approved an
Executive Bonus Plan for 2008 (the 2008 Plan) as
recommended by the Compensation Committee. The 2008 Plan was
effective as of January 1, 2008 and was unchanged from the
previous year. Payments under the 2008 Plan were based both on
the achievement of quarterly and annual operating profit goals
by the company. Under the Plan, operating profit is defined as
gross margin, less research and development, sales and
marketing, and general and administrative expenses, as well as
various expenses determined by the company to be extraordinary.
No such extraordinary expenses were excluded from the
calculation of operating profit in 2008.
Executive officers eligible to participate in the 2008 Plan with
respect to both the quarterly and annual bonus components were
Mr. Marx, Mr. Rohaly and Mr. Chhor. As part of
his employment agreement signed in January 2008, Mr. Chhor
was guaranteed a quarterly bonus payment for the first quarter
of 2008, prorated for his February 1, 2008 start date.
Because of his sales role, Dr. Mueller was eligible to
participate in the annual component of the 2008 Plan only, and
was eligible to receive quarterly bonus payments under the
companys Sales Commission Plan, which is described under
Incentive Cash Payouts under the Sales Commission
Plan below.
Quarterly
Component
Under the quarterly bonus component of the 2008 Plan, executive
officers of the company were eligible to receive quarterly cash
bonuses amounting to 10% of their respective annual base
salaries, if the company achieved positive operating profit for
that quarterly period. The maximum amount that any executive
officer could earn in quarterly bonus payments in the fiscal
year was 40% of his respective annual base salary.
Annual
Component
Under the annual bonus component of the 2008 Plan, executive
officers were eligible to receive additional variable bonuses
amounting to between 20% and 40% of their respective annual base
salaries, based upon the achievement by the company of the
following annual operating profit targets:
|
|
|
|
|
20% of annual base salary would be paid if the company recorded
at least $1.0 million of annual operating profit;
|
|
|
|
30% of annual base salary would be paid if the company recorded
at least $1.5 million of annual operating profit; and
|
|
|
|
40% of annual base salary would be paid if the company recorded
at least $2.0 million of annual operating profit.
|
The maximum amount that any executive officer could earn in
combined quarterly and annual bonus payments under the 2008 Plan
in the fiscal year was 80% of his respective annual base salary.
Incentive
Cash Payouts under the 2008 Plan
SCM did not achieve positive operating profit in the first,
second and third quarters of 2008, and no cash bonuses were
awarded under the 2008 Plan for these periods. SCM has not yet
completed the preparation of its results for the fourth quarter
of 2008. SCM did not achieve positive operating profit for the
full year 2008, and no cash bonuses were awarded under the
annual component of the 2008 Plan. As noted above,
Mr. Chhor was paid a guaranteed bonus amounting to 10% of
his annual base salary for the first quarter of 2008, prorated
for his February 1, 2008 start date, as specified in his
employment agreement.
Incentive
Cash Payouts under the Sales Commission Plan
As noted above, during 2008 Dr. Mueller was eligible to
receive quarterly cash awards under the companys Sales
Commission Plan. Under this plan, for each of the four quarters
of 2008, Dr. Mueller was eligible to receive a quarterly
bonus payment of up to 10% of his then-current annual base
salary based on 100% achievement of quarterly revenue goals and
individual objectives. Two-thirds of this potential bonus amount
was based on the achievement of at least 75% of quarterly
revenue targets set forth in the companys budget and sales
forecasts as
184
approved by the board for each year, and one-third was based
upon the achievement of personal quarterly objectives as
approved by the Compensation Committee for each quarter.
Additionally, if revenue targets were achieved above the 100%
level in any quarter, then Dr. Muellers potential
bonus for that quarter would be increased by an additional 2.5%
for every percentage point achieved above 100%. At 100%
achievement of quarterly revenue targets,
Dr. Muellers target quarterly bonus was 10,000
for revenue generation and 5,000 for individual objectives
for the first quarter of 2008, and 11,200 for revenue
generation and 5,600 for individual objectives for the
second, third and fourth quarters of 2008.
The revenue target for Dr. Mueller in the first quarter of
2008 was $2.7 million. Individual objectives for
Dr. Mueller in the first quarter of 2008 included meeting
with key strategic partner targets; setting up sales and
marketing programs and engaging new distributors in new
geographic regions; and setting up a framework to market and
sell new USB token products, including creating a business plan,
cultivating strategic partners, developing a sales channel and
developing marketing collateral. For the first quarter of 2008,
Dr. Mueller achieved 88% of his revenue target, resulting
in a payout of 70.8% under the revenue portion of the plan, and
he achieved 100% of his personal objectives. This resulted in an
aggregate payout equal to 80.5% of his target award, or
12,082.
The revenue target for Dr. Mueller in the second quarter of
2008 was $3.1 million. Individual objectives for
Dr. Mueller in the second quarter of 2008 included managing
strategic partner relationships to support the development of a
new USB token business; continue to develop and manage the
distribution channel for the companys eHealth terminals,
including the creation and monitoring of pilot deployments; and
manage strategic partner relationships aimed at the
e-passport
market. For the second quarter of 2008, Dr. Mueller
achieved 90% of his revenue target, resulting in a payout of
75.1% under the revenue portion of the plan, and he achieved
100% of his personal objectives. This resulted in an aggregate
payout equal to 83.4% of his target award, or 14,013.
The revenue target for Dr. Mueller in the third quarter of
2008 was $3.1 million. Individual objectives for
Dr. Mueller in the third quarter of 2008 included managing
strategic partner relationships to support the development of a
new USB token business and securing volume orders for the USB
products; finalizing a global marketing strategy for the
companys CHIPDRIVE products; and transferring all EMEA
sales activities to a newly hired regional sales executive. For
the third quarter of 2008, Dr. Mueller achieved 69% of his
revenue target, resulting in a payout of 0% under the revenue
portion of the plan, and he achieved 85% of his personal
objectives. This resulted in an aggregate payout equal to 28.3%
of his target award, or 4,760.
The revenue target for Dr. Mueller in the fourth quarter of
2008 was $11.0 million. Individual objectives for
Dr. Mueller in the fourth quarter of 2008 included managing
the USB token business and securing volume orders for the USB
products; finalizing the business plan for 2009; expanding the
global distribution channel as part of the companys
strategy to expand sales into new geographic regions; and
planning the 2009 launch of the CHIPDRIVE product line into the
U.S. For the fourth quarter of 2008, Dr. Mueller
achieved 82% of his revenue target, resulting in a payout of 54%
under the revenue portion of the plan, and he achieved 74% of
his personal objectives. This resulted in an aggregate payout
equal to 61% of his target award, or 10,177.
Additional
Performance Cash Bonuses
In December 2008, the Compensation Committee approved the
payment of a cash bonus of $333,333 to Mr. Marx to be paid
out in March 2009, in recognition of his significant
contributions to the company and his performance in 2008,
including his efforts to re-position the company and to
implement its growth strategy, and is contingent upon
Mr. Marxs continuing employment with the company at
the time of such payment.
Long-Term
Equity Incentives
SCMs stock option program is designed to attract, retain
and reward talented employees and executives through long-term
compensation that is directly linked to long-term performance.
As the bulk of SCMs employees are in Germany and India,
where stock options are not commonly awarded to non-executive
employees, SCM regards stock options as a competitive tool in
its overall compensation program.
185
SCM grants equity incentives in the form of stock options to
each of its executive officers, at the time of hiring, on an
annual basis and from time to time as an incentive to achieve
specific performance objectives. The exercise price of all
options awarded is the closing price of SCMs stock on the
NASDAQ Stock Market on the date of grant. The company believes
stock options are an effective way to align executives
interests with the interests of the companys stockholders
because the stock options have value only to the extent that the
price of the companys stock increases after the date of
grant.
The number of stock options granted to newly hired executive
officers is determined by the Compensation Committee, based on
the companys historical practices and on the
executives position. Initial options vest
1/4th after
one year and then 1/48th per month for the next three
years, such that they are fully vested after four years. Annual
top-up
grants are made based on the positive results of annual
performance reviews and are generally in an amount ranging
between 25% and 33% of the options received in the executive
officers initial grant. Annual
top-up
grants vest at a rate of 1/48th per month over four years,
commencing at the date of grant. If the executive officer
terminates employment before the end of the vesting period, all
unvested options are forfeited. As options are granted annually,
some portion of an executive officers options vest each
year, rewarding the executive for past service, while an often
greater portion remains unvested, creating a long-term incentive
to remain with the company.
In February 2008, the Compensation Committee awarded
Mr. Chhor an initial stock option grant of
40,000 shares of SCM common stock upon his joining the
Company. At the time, the Compensation Committee also awarded
special one-time incentive option grants to Mr. Marx and
Mr. Rohaly. These awards were made in lieu of annual salary
increases, to increase the long-term incentive portion of their
overall compensation package in relation to salary, and to bring
equity compensation for these officers into alignment with peer
companies. In making its determination, the Compensation
Committee reviewed salary and equity data for the chief
executive officer and chief financial officer at six companies
that operate in similar segments of the security industry to
SCM, and which the committee believes are comparable for the
purposes of compensation comparison. These companies included
ActivIdentity, Entrust, L-1 Identity Solutions, Secure Computing
Tumbleweed Communications and Vasco Data Security.
In April 2008, the Compensation Committee awarded annual
top-up
grants to Mr. Marx and Mr. Rohaly of
19,800 shares and
top-up and
promotion grants of 6,500 and 14,000 shares, respectively,
to Dr. Mueller. The Compensation Committee determined the
amount to be granted to each executive officer based on his
individual performance in past recent periods and in order to
retain and motivate each executive in the future.
Benefits
and Perquisites
Because SCM has a strong regional presence in Germany and the
majority of its executives and key employees have been based in
Germany, the company follows the standard European practice of
providing either a company car or a car allowance to its
executive officers in Germany. SCM leases BMW cars or provides a
comparable allowance for its executive officers.
Retirement
Payments
On behalf of its executive officers in Germany, SCM makes
payments to a government-managed pension program, to
government-managed or private health insurance programs, and in
some cases for unemployment insurance, as mandated under German
employment law.
Lawrence
W. Midland
Mr. Midland is expected to become an executive officer of
SCM following the companys merger with Hirsch, in the
position of Executive Vice President, Hirsch Business Division.
Mr. Midlands compensation with SCM was negotiated as
part of the Merger Agreement and includes a base salary of
$250,000, participation in the 2008 Executive Bonus Plan and an
option grant to purchase up to 40,000 shares of SCM common
stock under SCMs 2007 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Midland
is also eligible to receive certain other benefits such as
health insurance, as are provided to other employees of Hirsch
occupying positions with responsibility and salary comparable to
that of Mr. Midland.
186
Severance
Benefits
SCM does not have a policy regarding severance or change of
control agreements for its executive officers and historically
has not offered severance as part of its employment contracts.
Under standard employment practice in Germany, notice of
termination is required to be given by either the employer or
the employee, and the employer is required to continue to
compensate the employee for salary and eligible bonus amounts
during this period. The length of the notice period varies from
company to company. SCMs policy for executive officers
generally is to require a notice period of three to six months,
following a trial period of initial employment of three to six
months. The length of individual notice and trial periods for
each executive officer is stated in his employment contract. In
lieu of continuing the employment relationship for six months,
SCMs employment agreements provide that the company can
cash out the employee who has given notice. Alternatively, SCM
can require that the employee continue to work his or her
six-month notice period. This practice is included in the
majority of SCMs employment agreements with its executive
officers. Additionally, under German labor practices, terminated
employees also are eligible to continue to receive health and
unemployment insurance coverage, pension contributions, car
leasing expenses or car allowance, and other benefits provided
during their employment, for the duration of the notice period.
Further, under German labor practices, terminated employees may
also be entitled to receive quarterly or annual bonus payments,
the amount of which would be determined based on a variety of
factors, including the employees length of service and
perceived contributions to past or future company performance,
as well as other factors. Actual bonus payments for which
individual employees may become eligible are determined at or
following termination, and cannot be projected.
As is customary in Germany, SCM has entered into employment
agreements with each of its Named Executive Officers. In
connection with the Merger, Mr. Midland has entered into an
employment agreement with Hirsch, to become effective on the
effective date of the Merger as described in The
Merger Interests of Hirsch Directors and Executive
Officers in the Merger Employment Agreements.
The terms of each of these agreements are discussed below under
Termination / Change in Control Payments.
In July 2008, SCM Microsystems GmbH, a wholly-owned subsidiary
of SCM entered into supplemental employment agreements (the
Supplements) with Mr. Marx and Mr. Rohaly
in order to modify certain provisions regarding severance,
notice periods and non-competition. The terms of both
Supplements are identical and are outlined below.
Pursuant to the Supplements, if the executive officer is given
ordinary notice of termination by SCM without the executive
officer having given prior notice of termination or having
caused SCM to give such notice as a result of severe and
avoidable misconduct, then the executive officer will be
eligible to receive a one-time severance payment equal to
12 months of his then-current monthly salary and a bonus
payment under the companys Executive Bonus Plan equal to
40% of his then current annual salary.
The Supplement further provides that either the executive
officer or SCM may terminate the executive officers
employment agreement by providing 12 months written
notice. In the event of termination by SCM, the executive
officer may be required to continue to perform his
responsibilities for the company only for a period of up to
three months, excluding unused holiday hours, after which he
will be released from his employment. Any remainder of the
12-month
notice period following release from employment (from nine to
12 months) is the release period, during which the
executive officer would continue to receive his then-current
monthly salary and a fixed bonus payment under the
companys Executive Bonus Plan equal to 40% of his then
current annual salary. Such remuneration during the release
period would be in addition to the one-time severance payment
described above. In the event of notice of termination by the
executive officer, the executive officer may be required to
continue to perform his responsibilities for the company for up
to the entire
12-month
notice period, during which time he would continue to receive
regular salary payments and remain eligible for bonus payments
under the companys Executive Bonus Plan, and thereafter
would not be eligible for any further remuneration or the
severance payments described above.
Additionally, the Supplement provides that following any
ordinary notice of termination given by the company to the
executive officer, during the release period the executive
officer would continue to be prohibited from engaging in any
other employment, occupation, consulting or other business
activity competitive with or related to the current or future
business of the company. He would also be prohibited from
acquiring, obtaining an equity
187
interest in or otherwise supporting any enterprise which engages
in business activity competitive with or related to the current
or future business of the company.
Summary
of SCM Executive Compensation in 2008
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to the compensation of SCMs Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and the highest paid executive officers other
than the CEO and CFO, based on total compensation earned during
fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, for their services with SCM in
all capacities during the 2008, 2007 and 2006 fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Grants
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
(1)(2)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Felix Marx
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
363,607
|
|
|
$
|
333,333
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
51,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,070
|
(13)
|
|
$
|
795,468
|
|
Chief Executive Officer (22)(23)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
66,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
27,264
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
8,469
|
(14)
|
|
$
|
104,925
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephan Rohaly
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
354,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,682
|
(15)
|
|
$
|
444,012
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (22)(24)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
313,065
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
116,845
|
|
|
$
|
62,059
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
34,385
|
(16)
|
|
$
|
576,354
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
200,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,303
|
|
|
$
|
57,353
|
(8)
|
|
$
|
19,693
|
(17)
|
|
$
|
305,245
|
|
Eang Sour Chhor
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
243,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,175
|
|
|
$
|
18,717
|
(9)
|
|
$
|
37,753
|
(18)
|
|
$
|
312,629
|
|
Executive Vice President, Strategy,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing and Engineering (22)(25)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Manfred Mueller
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
241,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,087
|
|
|
$
|
60,552
|
(10)
|
|
$
|
37,311
|
(19)
|
|
$
|
361,608
|
|
Executive Vice President Strategic
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
202,211
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
68,927
|
|
|
$
|
56,229
|
(11)
|
|
$
|
33,283
|
(20)
|
|
$
|
390,650
|
|
Sales and Business Development (22)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
178,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,797
|
|
|
$
|
35,637
|
(12)
|
|
$
|
35,133
|
(21)
|
|
$
|
268,953
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts in this column represent the expense recognized for
financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the
fiscal year in accordance with SFAS 123(R). These amounts
may reflect options granted in years prior to 2008. Option
expense figures are calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton
valuation model using the following assumptions: a dividend rate
of zero, an interest rate for the expected life of the option at
the date of grant, an expected option life of 4.00 years,
and volatility based on historical averages at the date of
grant. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the period ended December 31, 2007 for more information
about how SCM accounts for stock-based compensation. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects both time-based initial or annual options as well as
performance-based options to purchase shares of the
companys stock granted under its 1997 Stock Option Plan,
its 2000 Stock Option Plan and its 2007 Stock Option Plan, as
discussed in Compensation Discussion and Analysis under
Compensation Elements: Long-Term Equity Incentives. |
Bonus
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Reflects special performance bonus in recognition of
Mr. Marxs contributions to the company and his
performance in 2008, including his efforts to re-position the
company and to implement its growth strategy. |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects special performance bonuses based on expanded
responsibilities during the period following the departure of
SCMs former CEO in July 2007 until the hiring of its
current CEO in late October 2007. |
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
|
|
|
(5) |
|
For 2008, reflects cash bonus awards earned under SCMs
2008 Plan, and in the case of Dr. Mueller, awards earned
both under SCMs 2008 Plan and its Sales Commission Plan.
For 2007, reflects cash bonus awards earned under SCMs
2007 Plan, and in the case of Dr. Mueller, awards earned
both under SCMs 2007 Plan and its Sales Commission Plan.
For 2006, reflects cash bonus awards earned under SCMs
Management by Objective program, in the case of
Messrs. Rohaly and Mueller. These plans are discussed in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis under Compensation
Elements Incentive Cash Bonuses. |
188
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Reflects a cash bonus of 18,581, or 10% of
Mr. Marxs annual base salary as prorated for his
service from late October through the end of 2007, based on the
achievement of operating profit in the fourth quarter of 2007,
as determined under SCMs 2007 Plan. |
|
(7) |
|
Reflects quarterly bonus awards of 20,000 and
24,000, or 10% of Mr. Rohalys annual base
salary for the first and fourth quarters of 2007, respectively,
based on the achievement of operating profitability in those
quarters, as determined under SCMs 2007 Plan. |
|
(8) |
|
Reflects quarterly performance bonus awards paid to
Mr. Rohaly under the companys Management by Objective
program. |
|
(9) |
|
Reflects guaranteed bonus payment of 12,000, or 10% of
Mr. Chhors annual base salary, prorated for his
February 1, 2008 start date, as specified in
Mr. Chhors employment agreement. |
|
(10) |
|
Reflects quarterly cash awards totaling 41,032 for the
four quarters of 2008 under SCMs Sales Commission Plan, as
discussed in Compensation Discussion and Analysis under
Compensation Elements: Incentive Cash Payouts under the
Sales Commission Plan. |
|
(11) |
|
Reflects a quarterly bonus award of 14,500, or 10% of
Dr. Muellers annual base salary, based on the
achievement of operating profitability in the first quarter of
2007 as determined under SCMs 2007 Plan. Also reflects
quarterly cash awards totaling 26,133 for the second,
third and fourth quarters of 2007, during which periods
Dr. Mueller was eligible to receive cash awards under
SCMs Sales Commission Plan, as discussed in Compensation
Discussion and Analysis under Compensation Elements:
Incentive Cash Payouts under the Sales Commission Plan. |
|
(12) |
|
Reflects quarterly performance bonus awards under the
companys Management by Objective program and a
discretionary bonus awarded to Dr. Mueller for the third
quarter of 2006. |
All
Other Compensation
|
|
|
(13) |
|
Reflects payments of 7,750, and 24,887 made on
Mr. Marxs behalf in 2008 for a rental apartment in
Germany, as Mr. Marxs home is in Austria, and car
leasing and insurance expenses, respectively. |
|
(14) |
|
Reflects payments of 1,761 and 4,180 made on
Mr. Marxs behalf in 2007 for travel between
SCMs offices in Germany and Mr. Marxs home in
Austria, and car leasing and insurance expenses, respectively. |
|
(15) |
|
Reflects payments of 319 and 20,559 made on
Mr. Rohalys behalf in 2008 for pension and employee
saving contributions, and car leasing and insurance expenses,
respectively. |
|
(16) |
|
Reflects payments of 3,454, 1,803 and 20,156
made on Mr. Rohalys behalf in 2007 for pension and
employee saving contributions, health and unemployment
insurance, and car leasing expenses, respectively. |
|
(17) |
|
Reflects payments of 3,504, 2,339 and 9,807
made on Mr. Rohalys behalf in 2006 for pension and
employee saving contributions, health and unemployment
insurance, and car allowance and leasing expenses, respectively. |
|
(18) |
|
Reflects payments of 10,078 made on Mr. Chhors
behalf in 2008 for travel between Germany and
Mr. Chhors home in France for February through July
2008 and living allowance August through December 2008; and
payments made on Mr. Chhors behalf in 2008 of
9,859 and 5,400 for pension contributions and health
and unemployment insurance, and car allowance, respectively. |
|
(19) |
|
Reflects payments of 10,431 and 14,824 made on
Dr. Muellers behalf in 2008 for pension and employee
saving contributions and health and unemployment insurance, and
car leasing and insurance expenses, respectively. |
|
(20) |
|
Reflects payments of 6,588, 3,967 and 13,945
made on Dr. Muellers behalf in 2007 for pension and
employee saving contributions, health and unemployment
insurance, and car leasing expenses, respectively. |
|
(21) |
|
Reflects payments of 6,462, 4,502 and 17,227
made on Dr. Muellers behalf in 2006 for pension and
employee saving contributions, health and unemployment
insurance, and car leasing expenses, respectively. |
189
Exchange
Rate
|
|
|
(22) |
|
Messrs. Marx, Rohaly, Chhor and Mueller are paid in local
currency, which is the Euro. Due to fluctuations in exchange
rates during the year, amounts in U.S. dollars varied from month
to month. Amounts shown in dollars under Salary and
All Other Compensation above were derived using the
average exchange rates for the quarter in which such amounts
were earned and paid. Amounts shown in dollars under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation were derived
using exchange rates that correspond to the period in which
award payments were made, generally the quarter after they were
earned. Average exchange rates for the periods shown in the
table above are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
0.835 per dollar
|
|
|
|
0.764 per dollar
|
|
|
|
0.681 per dollar
|
|
|
|
0.742 per dollar
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.811 per dollar
|
|
|
|
0.745 per dollar
|
|
|
|
0.641 per dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
0.786 per dollar
|
|
|
|
0.736 per dollar
|
|
|
|
0.649 per dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
0.785 per dollar
|
|
|
|
0.701 per dollar
|
|
|
|
0.745 per dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(23) |
|
Mr. Marx joined the company in October 2007. |
|
(24) |
|
Mr. Rohaly joined the company in March 2006. |
|
(25) |
|
Mr. Chhor joined the company in February 2008. |
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to the grant of non-equity and equity incentive plan awards
under SCMs quarterly and annual bonus programs and its
stock option plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
|
Awards; Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Plan
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Exercise or Base
|
|
|
Value of Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards(1)(2)
|
|
|
Underlying Options
|
|
|
Price of Option
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
(#)(3)
|
|
|
Awards (Per/Share)
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
Felix Marx
|
|
|
02/26/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
3.05
|
|
|
$
|
135,320
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
4/22/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,800
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
3.12
|
|
|
$
|
27,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
147,951
|
|
|
$
|
298,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephan Rohaly
|
|
|
02/26/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
3.05
|
|
|
$
|
135,320
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
4/22/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,800
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
3.12
|
|
|
$
|
27,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
138,981
|
|
|
$
|
268,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eang Sour Chhor
|
|
|
02/01/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
3.41
|
|
|
$
|
60,520
|
|
Executive Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
94,876
|
|
|
$
|
191,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy, Marketing and Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Manfred Mueller
|
|
|
4/22/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
3.12
|
|
|
$
|
19,477
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
4/22/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
(8)
|
|
$
|
3.12
|
|
|
$
|
9,043
|
|
Strategic Sales and Business Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
94,479
|
|
|
$
|
185,045
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Refers to the potential payouts for 2008 under SCMs 2008
Plan, and in the case of Dr. Mueller, its Sales Commission
Plan, as further discussed in Compensation Discussion and
Analysis. Target amounts are calculated based on
100% achievement of quarterly target bonuses only.
Maximum amounts reflect total potential payout based
on 100% achievement of both quarterly and annual targets. In the
case of Mr. Chhor, potential bonus amounts are prorated
based his length of employment with SCM during 2008. Actual
bonus amounts paid to SCMs executives for 2008 are shown
in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column
of the Summary Compensation Table. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts shown in dollars are converted from Euros, in which
currency SCMs German-based executives are paid, and were
derived using exchange rates that correspond to the period in
which award payments would |
190
|
|
|
|
|
typically be made, which generally is the quarter after they
were earned. Exchange rates used in this conversion are
therefore: 0.641 per dollar for the second quarter of
2008, 0.649 per dollar for the third quarter of 2008,
0.745 per dollar for the fourth quarter of 2008 and
0.742 per dollar for the first quarter of 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
During 2008, SCM granted options to its executives under its
2007 Stock Option Plan. All options have an exercise price that
is the closing price of SCMs common stock on the NASDAQ
Stock Market on the date of grant and expire seven years from
the date of grant. |
|
(4) |
|
The grant date fair value of the options awards is calculated
using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model using the
following assumptions: a dividend rate of zero, an interest rate
for the expected life of the option at the date of grant, an
expected option life of 4.00 years, and volatility based on
historical averages at the date of grant. See Note 2 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in for the period ended
December 31, 2007 for more information about how SCM
accounts for stock-based compensation. |
|
(5) |
|
Reflects incentive option granted in lieu of an annual salary
increase for 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
Reflects annual options that vest
1/48th
per month commencing on the date of grant. |
|
(7) |
|
Reflects initial options to purchase shares of SCMs common
stock, granted upon joining the company. These options vest 25%
one year from the date of grant and then vest
1/48th
per month for 36 months. |
|
(8) |
|
Reflects incentive option grant based on Dr. Muellers
promotion in February 2008. |
|
(9) |
|
Under the Sales Commission Plan, there is no limit to the amount
of bonus that can be earned for the achievement of revenue above
target levels. |
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to the outstanding equity awards held by SCMs Named
Executive Officers at the end of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Felix Marx
|
|
10/22/2007
|
|
|
14,583
|
|
|
|
35,417
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
10/22/2017
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
10/22/2007
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
|
7,084
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
10/22/2014
|
|
|
02/26/2008
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
3.05
|
|
|
02/26/2015
|
|
|
04/22/2008
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
3.12
|
|
|
04/22/2015
|
Stephan Rohaly
|
|
3/14/2006
|
|
|
20,625
|
|
|
|
9,375
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
3.21
|
|
|
3/14/2016
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
3.41
|
|
|
9/28/2016
|
|
|
2/14/2007
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
4.02
|
|
|
2/14/2017
|
|
|
3/23/2007
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
19,800
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
4.34
|
|
|
3/23/2017
|
|
|
02/26/2008
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
3.05
|
|
|
02/26/2015
|
|
|
04/22/2008
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
3.12
|
|
|
04/22/2015
|
Eang Sour Chhor
Executive Vice President, Strategy, Marketing and Engineering
|
|
02/01/2008
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
3.41
|
|
|
02/01/2015
|
Dr. Manfred Mueller
|
|
7/17/2001
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
8.08
|
|
|
7/17/2011
|
Executive Vice
|
|
4/16/2003
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
|
0
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
3.31
|
|
|
4/16/2013
|
President Strategic
|
|
4/16/2003
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
0
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
3.31
|
|
|
4/16/2013
|
Sales and Business
|
|
9/16/2004
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
9/16/2014
|
Development
|
|
9/16/2004
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
9/16/2014
|
|
|
7/27/2005
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
3.08
|
|
|
7/27/2015
|
|
|
2/02/2006
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
3.23
|
|
|
2/02/2016
|
|
|
7/05/2006
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6,200
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
3.03
|
|
|
7/05/2016
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
3.41
|
|
|
9/28/2016
|
|
|
2/14/2007
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
4.02
|
|
|
2/14/2017
|
|
|
3/23/2007
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
4.34
|
|
|
3/23/2017
|
|
|
04/22/2008
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
5,417
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
3.12
|
|
|
04/22/2015
|
|
|
04/22/2008
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
11,667
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
3.12
|
|
|
04/22/2015
|
191
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Vests 25% after one year, then
1/48th
vests monthly for 36 months. |
|
(2) |
|
Vests 100% three years from date of grant. |
|
(3) |
|
Vests
1/48th
per month from date of grant. |
|
(4) |
|
Vests 100% one year from date of grant. |
|
(5) |
|
Vests
1/12th
per month over one year, commencing four years from date of
grant. |
Pension
Benefits
SCM does not offer pension benefits and have, therefore, omitted
the Pension Benefits table. As described in Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, on behalf of its executives in Germany,
SCM makes payments to a government-managed pension program, to
government-managed or private health insurance programs, and in
some cases for unemployment insurance, as mandated under German
employment law. These payments were quantified in the All
Other Compensation column of the summary compensation
table. Any use of the term pension in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis or the related tables are
references to the government-managed pension program.
Termination/Change
in Control Payments
The information below describes certain compensation that would
have become payable under contractual arrangements assuming a
termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2008,
based upon the Named Executive Officers compensation and
service levels as of such date.
SCM has entered into employment agreements containing severance
provisions with each of its current executive officers. Below
are the material terms of each agreement. None of SCMs
current executive officers included below are of retirement age
and none of their respective agreements contain provisions for
additional payments upon retirement. The company does not offer
its executive officers severance benefits in the case of death,
disability or voluntary termination.
Following any termination, each of the agreements described
below requires the Named Executive Officer to keep as secret all
confidential information related to SCM, including, but not
limited to, operational and business secrets.
Employment
Agreements
Employment
Agreement with Felix Marx
On July 31, 2007, through SCMs wholly-owned
subsidiary, SCM Microsystems GmbH, the company entered into an
employment agreement with Felix Marx, who became its Chief
Executive Officer and Managing Director of SCM Microsystems
GmbH, effective October 22, 2007. During the first six
months of his employment, either Mr. Marx or SCM
Microsystems GmbH may terminate the agreement and
Mr. Marxs employment with SCM upon at least three
months prior written notice. Thereafter, either party may
terminate the agreement with six months prior written
notice.
On July 30, 2008, through SCM Microsystems, GmbH, the
company entered into a supplemental employment agreement with
Mr. Marx that amends his employment agreement and modifies
certain provisions regarding severance, notice periods and
non-competition. Under the supplementary employment agreement,
if Mr. Marx is given ordinary notice of termination by SCM
without Mr. Marx having given prior notice of termination
or having caused SCM to give such notice as a result of severe
and avoidable misconduct, then Mr. Marx will be eligible to
receive a one-time severance payment equal to 12 months of
his then-current monthly salary and a bonus payment under the
companys Executive Bonus Plan equal to 40% of his
then-current annual salary.
The supplementary employment agreement further provides that
either Mr. Marx or SCM may terminate Mr. Marxs
employment agreement by providing 12 months written
notice. In the event of termination by SCM, Mr. Marx may be
required to continue to perform his responsibilities for the
company only for a period of up to three months, excluding
unused holiday hours, after which he will be released from his
employment. Any remainder of
192
the 12-month
notice period following release from employment (from nine to
12 months) is the release period, during which
Mr. Marx would continue to receive his then-current monthly
salary and a fixed bonus payment under the companys
Executive Bonus Plan equal to 40% of his then current annual
salary. Such remuneration during the release period would be in
addition to the one-time severance payment described above. In
the event of notice of termination by Mr. Marx, he may be
required to continue to perform his responsibilities for the
company for up to the entire
12-month
notice period, during which time he would continue to receive
regular salary payments and remain eligible for bonus payments
under the companys Executive Bonus Plan, and thereafter
would not be eligible for any further remuneration or the
severance payments described above.
Additionally, following any ordinary notice of termination given
by the company to Mr. Marx, during the release period
Mr. Marx would continue to be prohibited from engaging in
any other employment, occupation, consulting or other business
activity competitive with or related to the current or future
business of the company. He would also be prohibited from
acquiring, obtaining an equity interest in or otherwise
supporting any enterprise which engages in business activity
competitive with or related to the current or future business of
the company.
If Mr. Marx had been so terminated as of December 31,
2008, under his employment agreement, he would have been
entitled to receive a severance payment of 280,000, a
release period payment of 280,000, a bonus payment of
112,000, and other compensation of 32,437 related to
apartment rental and car leasing and insurance expenses, or
approximately $898,516, based on the average exchange rate for
December 2008 of one dollar being equal to 0.784 Euros.
Additionally, under German labor practices, Mr. Marx might
also have been entitled to receive quarterly or annual bonus
payments, the amount of which would be determined based on a
variety of factors, including his length of service and
perceived contributions to past or future company performance.
Following any termination, under his employment agreement,
Mr. Marx is subject to a two-year non-solicitation
provision.
Employment
Agreements with Stephan Rohaly
On March 14, 2006, through SCMs wholly-owned
subsidiary, SCM Microsystems GmbH, the company entered into an
employment agreement with Stephan Rohaly, who became its Chief
Financial Officer on March 21, 2006. Either Mr. Rohaly
or SCM Microsystems GmbH may terminate the agreement and
Mr. Rohalys employment with SCM upon at least six
months prior written notice.
On July 30, 2008, through SCM Microsystems, GmbH, the
company entered into a supplemental employment agreement with
Mr. Rohaly that amends his employment agreement and
modifies certain provisions regarding severance, notice periods
and non-competition. Under the supplementary employment
agreement, if Mr. Rohaly is given ordinary notice of
termination by SCM without Mr. Rohaly having given prior
notice of termination or having caused SCM to give such notice
as a result of severe and avoidable misconduct, then
Mr. Rohaly will be eligible to receive a one-time severance
payment equal to 12 months of his then-current monthly
salary and a bonus payment under the companys Executive
Bonus Plan equal to 40% of his then-current annual salary.
The supplementary employment agreement further provides that
either Mr. Rohaly or SCM may terminate
Mr. Rohalys employment agreement by providing
12 months written notice. In the event of termination
by SCM, Mr. Rohaly may be required to continue to perform
his responsibilities for the company only for a period of up to
three months, excluding unused holiday hours, after which he
will be released from his employment. Any remainder of the
12-month
notice period following release from employment (from nine to
12 months) is the release period, during which
Mr. Rohaly would continue to receive his then-current
monthly salary and a fixed bonus payment under the
companys Executive Bonus Plan equal to 40% of his then
current annual salary. Such remuneration during the release
period would be in addition to the one-time severance payment
described above. In the event of notice of termination by
Mr. Rohaly, he may be required to continue to perform his
responsibilities for the company for up to the entire
12-month
notice period, during which time he would continue to receive
regular salary payments and remain eligible for bonus payments
under the companys Executive Bonus Plan, and thereafter
would not be eligible for any further remuneration or the
severance payments described above.
Additionally, following any ordinary notice of termination given
by the company to Mr. Rohaly, during the release period
Mr. Rohaly would continue to be prohibited from engaging in
any other employment, occupation,
193
consulting or other business activity competitive with or
related to the current or future business of the company. He
would also be prohibited from acquiring, obtaining an equity
interest in or otherwise supporting any enterprise which engages
in business activity competitive with or related to the current
or future business of the company.
If Mr. Rohaly had been so terminated as of
December 31, 2008, under his employment agreement, he would
have been entitled to receive a severance payment of
240,000, a release period payment of 240,000, a
bonus payment of 96,000, and other compensation of
20,878 related to pension and employee saving
contributions and car leasing and insurance expenses, or
approximately $761,324, based on the average exchange rate for
December 2008 of one dollar being equal to 0.784 Euros.
Additionally, under German labor practices, Mr. Rohaly
might also have been entitled to receive quarterly or annual
bonus payments, the amount of which would be determined based on
a variety of factors, including his length of service and
perceived contributions to past or future company performance.
Employment
Agreement with Eang Sour Chhor
On January 21, 2008, through SCMs wholly-owned
subsidiary, SCM Microsystems GmbH, the company entered into an
employment agreement with Sour Chhor, who became its Executive
Vice President, Strategy, Marketing and Engineering effective
February 1, 2008. During the first six months of his
employment, either Mr. Chhor or SCM Microsystems GmbH may
terminate the agreement and Mr. Chhors employment
with SCM upon at least one months prior written notice.
Thereafter, either party may terminate Mr. Chhors
employment with three months prior written notice.
Mr. Chhor is also subject to the provisions of German labor
practices concerning the payment of bonus following notice of
termination as described above.
If Mr. Chhor had been so terminated as of December 31,
2008, under his employment agreement and German labor practices,
he would have been entitled to receive a release period payment
of 45,000, a bonus payment of 18,000, and other
compensation of 5,395 related to living allowance, pension
contributions, and health and unemployment insurance, or
approximately $87,238, based on an average exchange rate for
December 2008 of one dollar being equal to 0.784 Euros.
Mr. Chhor resigned from his position at SCM on February 6,
2009, effective June 30, 2009
Employment
Agreement with Dr. Manfred Mueller
On June 8, 2006, through SCMs wholly-owned
subsidiary, SCM Microsystems GmbH, the company entered into an
amended employment agreement with Dr. Manfred Mueller,
currently its Executive Vice President, Strategic Sales and
Business Development. Either Dr. Mueller or SCM may
terminate the agreement and Dr. Muellers employment
with SCM upon at least six months prior written notice.
Additionally, should Dr. Mueller be terminated without
having caused SCM to give such notice as a result of severe and
avoidable misconduct, he is also entitled to receive a severance
payment at the time of termination equal to 12 months of
his then-current base salary and target bonus of 40% of his
then-current annual base salary, payable in a lump sum by SCM
Microsystems GmbH.
If Dr. Mueller had been so terminated as of
December 31, 2008, he would have been entitled to receive a
release period payment of 84,000, a severance payment of
168,000, a bonus payment of 67,200, and other
compensation of 12,628 related to pension and employee
saving contributions, health and unemployment insurance and car
leasing expenses, or approximately $423,249. Figures in dollars
are based on the average exchange rate for December 2008 of one
dollar being equal to 0.784 Euros.
Employment
Agreement with Lawrence W. Midland
On December 10, 2008, through Hirsch, Lawrence W. Midland
entered into an employment agreement that will become effective
upon the completion of the Merger. Hirsch may terminate the
agreement and Mr. Midlands employment upon at least
three months prior written notice. If
Mr. Midlands employment is terminated by Hirsch
without cause, Mr. Midland shall be entitled to receive, in
addition to any accrued benefit rights and subject to execution
of a standard release of claims in favor of Hirsch, a payment
equal to six months of current base salary, or if
Mr. Midland terminates employment for good reason,
Mr. Midland shall be entitled to receive, in addition to
any
194
accrued benefit rights and subject to execution of a standard
release of claims in favor of Hirsch, a payment equal to three
months of current base salary. For more information with respect
to this matter, see the section entitled Certain
Agreements Related to the Merger Employment
Agreements with Hirsch Executive Officers.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2008, the Compensation Committee was comprised of
Messrs. Hultzsch, Koepf, Liebler and Turner, with
Dr. Liebler joining the committee in July 2008. Each of
these directors is currently a member of the committee.
Dr. Hultzsch has served as Chairman since April 2007. The
board of directors has determined that each member of the
Compensation Committee during 2008 was independent within the
meaning of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. director independence
standards.
During fiscal year 2007, Mr. Koepf had a relationship
requiring disclosure under Item 404 of
Regulation S-K.
See the section entitled Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions of this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus for additional information about this
relationship.
In addition, Mr. Humphreys was formerly an executive
officer of SCM, serving as SCMs President and Chairman of
the board from July 1996 until December 1996 and as SCMs
President and Chief Executive Officer from December 1996 until
April 2000.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes information as of
December 31, 2008 about SCMs common stock that may be
issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights granted
to employees, consultants or members of its board of directors
under all of its existing equity compensation plans, including
its 1997 Stock Plan, Director Plan, 1997 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (the Employee Stock Purchase Plan), 2000
Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the Nonstatutory
Plan) and 2007 Stock Option Plan. Each of the 1997 Stock
Plan, Director Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan expired in
March 2007 and no additional awards will be granted under such
plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Securities to be
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Securities Remaining
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Available for Future
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Issuance Under Equity
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column(a))
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders(1)
|
|
|
1,328,845
|
|
|
$
|
7.7219
|
|
|
|
924,591
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders(2)
|
|
|
499,828
|
|
|
$
|
3.3208
|
|
|
|
210,628
|
|
Total(3)
|
|
|
1,828,673
|
|
|
$
|
6.5189
|
|
|
|
1,135,219
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equity plans approved by stockholders consist of the 2007 Stock
Option Plan, the 1997 Stock Plan, the Director Plan and the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Equity plans not approved by stockholders consist of the
Nonstatutory Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Does not include options to purchase an aggregate of
8,018 shares of common stock awarded under Dazzle
Multimedia plans prior to SCMs acquisition of Dazzle
Multimedia in 2000. These options have a weighted average
exercise price of $4.368 and were granted under plans assumed in
connection with transactions under which no additional options
may be granted. |
Material
features of plans not approved by stockholders
Under the Nonstatutory Plan, non-qualified stock options may be
granted to SCMs employees, including officers, and to
non-employee consultants. The plans administrators, as
delegated by SCMs board of directors, may set the terms
for each option grant made under the plan, including the rate of
vesting, allowable exercise dates and the option term of such
options granted. The exercise price of a stock option under the
Nonstatutory Plan shall be equal to the fair market value of
SCMs common stock on the date of grant. While SCMs
board of directors or its
195
appointed committee may, at its discretion, reduce the exercise
price of any option to the then current fair market value if the
fair market value of the common stock covered by such option
shall have declined since the date the option was granted, no
such action has ever been taken by SCMs board of
directors. 750,000 shares are reserved for issuance under
the Nonstatutory Plan, and options for 1,221,736 shares
have been granted under the plan to date.
196
CERTAIN
SCM MICROSYSTEMS RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS
Related
Party Transaction Policy
The Audit Committee of SCMs board of directors, among its
other duties and responsibilities, reviews and monitors all
related party transactions and in November 2008 adopted changes
to SCMs Related Party Transaction Policies and
Procedures (the Policy). Under the Policy,
SCMs board of directors is required to review and approve
the material terms of all Interested Transactions
involving a related party (including directors, director
nominees, executive officers, greater-than-5% beneficial owners,
and their respective immediate family members), subject to
certain exceptions. An Interested Transaction is any
transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of similar
transactions, arrangements or relationships (including any
indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) in which (1) the
aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed
$100,000 per year or $30,000 in any quarter, (2) the
company is a participant and (3) any related party has or
will have a direct or indirect interest (other than solely as a
result of being a director or a less than 10 percent
beneficial owner of another entity). In determining whether to
approve or ratify an Interested Transaction, SCMs board of
directors is required to take into account, among other factors
it deems appropriate, whether the Interested Transaction is on
terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an
unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances
and the extent of the related persons interest in the
transaction.
Exceptions to the Policy include Interested Transactions for
which standing pre-approval has been authorized, such as the
hiring of executive officers and the payment of compensation to
directors, where such compensation is required to be disclosed
in the companys annual, quarterly or current filings;
transactions involving competitive bids; and regulated
transactions, such as for the rendering of regulated services,
for example with a public utility. At least annually, a summary
of new transactions covered by the standing pre-approvals
described above is provided to the Committee for its review.
To ensure the Policy is being followed, SCM requires each of its
non-employee directors and each of its executive officers to
provide and update information about related party relationships
and related party transactions on a quarterly and annual basis.
This information is reviewed by SCMs Corporate Accounting
personnel, which also reviews its sales and purchasing
transactions on an ongoing basis to identify any transactions
with known related parties.
SCMs Related Party Transaction Policy is in writing and
has been communicated by management to the companys
employees.
Related
Party Transactions
Werner Koepf, SCMs Chairman of the Board, also served
until June 2007 as a director and as a member of the Audit
Committee and the Compensation Committee of Gemplus
International S.A., a company engaged in the development and
distribution of smart-card based systems. During 2007, SCM
incurred license expenses of approximately $0.1 million to
Gemplus. Approximately $80,000 of this amount related to
continuing operations. License expenses of approximately
$0.2 million and $0.4 million were incurred for 2006
and 2005, respectively, of which approximately $76,000 and
$232,000 related to continuing operations. As of
December 31, 2007 and as of December 31, 2005, no
accounts payable were due to Gemplus. As of December 31,
2006, approximately $30,000 was due as accounts payable to
Gemplus. During 2007, SCM realized revenue of approximately
$0.2 million from sales to Gemplus. Revenues of
approximately $11,000 and $0 were realized for 2006 and 2005,
respectively. As of December 31, 2007 and as of
December 31, 2005, no accounts receivable were outstanding
from Gemplus. As of December 31, 2006, approximately
$11,000 was due as accounts receivable from Gemplus. SCMs
business relationship with Gemplus has been in existence for
many years and predates Werner Koepfs appointment to the
Companys Board of Directors in February 2006.
Mr. Koepf was not directly compensated for revenue
transactions between the two companies. The related-party
transactions have been performed following at arms
length principles.
197
COMPARISON
OF SCM MICROSYSTEMS STOCKHOLDERS AND HIRSCH ELECTRONICS
SHAREHOLDERS
RIGHTS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
The rights of Hirsch shareholders are currently governed by the
California Corporations Code, its articles of incorporation, as
amended, and the bylaws of Hirsch, which Hirsch refers to as the
articles of incorporation and bylaws of Hirsch, respectively.
The rights of SCM stockholders are currently governed by the
Delaware General Corporation Law, the Fourth Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, and the bylaws of SCM,
which Hirsch refers to as the certificate of incorporation and
bylaws of SCM, respectively. If the Merger is completed, Hirsch
shareholders will become stockholders of SCM, and their rights
will be governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law, and
the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of SCM.
The table below summarizes the material differences between the
rights of SCMs stockholders and Hirschs shareholders
pursuant to their respective articles or certificate of
incorporation, and bylaws, as amended and currently in effect.
While SCM and Hirsch believe that the summary table covers the
material differences between the rights of their respective
stockholders and shareholders prior to the Merger, this summary
does not include a complete description of all differences among
the rights of SCMs stockholders and Hirschs
shareholders, nor does it include a complete description of the
specific rights of these respective stockholders and
shareholders. Furthermore, the identification of some of the
differences in the rights of these stockholders and shareholders
as material is not intended to indicate that other differences
that may be equally important do not exist.
You are urged to read carefully the articles and bylaws of
Hirsch, and the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of SCM.
See the section entitled, Where You Can Find More
Information. Copies of the certificate of incorporation
and bylaws of SCM are filed as exhibits to the reports of SCM
filed with the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized Capital Stock
|
|
The authorized capital stock of SCM currently consists of
40,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per
share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.001 per share. All of the SCM preferred shares are available
for future issuance in one or more series to be issued from time
to time.
|
|
The authorized capital stock of Hirsch currently consists of
5,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
SCM board of directors is authorized to fix or alter the rights,
preferences, privileges, and restrictions granted to or imposed
upon wholly unissued series of preferred stock. There are
currently no outstanding shares of preferred stock.
|
|
Hirsch has not authorized any series of preferred stock.
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Directors
|
|
The board of directors shall consist of that number of directors
specified in the bylaws, the exact number to be fixed from time
to time exclusively by a resolution adopted by a majority of the
total number of authorized directors (whether or not any
vacancies exist at the time any such resolution is presented to
the board of directors for adoption). The current authorized
number of directors is eight (8).
|
|
The authorized number of directors shall be five (5). The
shareholders may change the number of directors from time to
time by a bylaw amendment duly adopted by the shareholders,
provided that the board of directors shall not consist of fewer
than three directors (unless the corporation has two or fewer
shareholders).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Voting
|
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, cumulative voting is
permitted if provided for in the certificate of incorporation.
SCMs certificate of incorporation does not provide for
cumulative voting.
|
|
Hirschs bylaws permit shareholders to exercise the right
of cumulative voting if the candidates name or the
candidates names have been placed in nomination prior to
the voting and the shareholder has given notice at the meeting
prior to the voting of the shareholders intention to
cumulate the shareholders votes. If any one shareholder
has given such notice, all shareholders may cumulate their votes
for such candidates in nomination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quorum
|
|
At any meeting of the stockholders, the holders of one-third
(1/3) of all of the shares of the stock entitled to vote at the
meeting, present in person or by proxy, shall constitute a
quorum for all purposes, unless or except to the extent that the
presence of a larger number may be required by law.
|
|
The holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote shall
constitute a quorum at a meeting of shareholders for the
transaction of any business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting Stock
|
|
Each stockholder has one vote for every share of stock entitled
to vote. Currently, there are no shares of any class outstanding
other than common stock.
|
|
Each shareholder has one vote for every share of stock entitled
to vote. Hirschs articles of incorporation only authorize
the issuance of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification of Board of Directors
|
|
SCMs articles of incorporation provide that the directors
be divided into three classes, as nearly equal in number as
possible, designated as Class I, Class II, and Class III.
Each class is elected every three years.
|
|
Hirschs articles of incorporation and bylaws do not
provide for classification of Hirschs board of directors.
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removal of Directors
|
|
Subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred
stock then outstanding, any director, or the entire board of
directors, may be removed from office at any time, with or
without cause, but only by the affirmative vote of the holders
of at least a majority of the voting power of all of the then
outstanding shares of capital stock of SCM entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors, voting together as a
single class. Vacancies resulting from such removal may be
filled by a majority of the directors then in office, though
less than a quorum, or by the stockholders at a special meeting
held for that purpose. Directors so chosen shall hold office
until the next annual meeting of stockholders.
|
|
The entire board of directors or any individual director may be
removed from office without cause by approval of the holders of
at least a majority of the shares, provided that unless the
entire board of directors is removed, an individual director
shall not be removed when the votes cast against such removal,
or not consenting in writing to such removal, would be
sufficient to elect such director if voted cumulatively at an
election of directors at which the same total number of votes
were cast, or, if such action is taken by written consent, in
lieu of a meeting, all shares entitled to vote were voted, and
the entire number of directors authorized at the time of the
directors most recent election were then being elected. If
any or all directors are so removed, new directors may be
elected at the same meeting or by such written consent.
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacancies on the Board of Directors
|
|
Vacancies on the board of directors for any reason and newly
created directorships resulting from an increase in the
authorized number of directors may be filled only by vote of a
majority of the remaining members of SCMs board of
directors, although less than a quorum, at any meeting of the
board of directors. A person so elected by the board of
directors to fill a vacancy or newly created directorship shall
hold office until the next election of the Class for which such
director shall have been chosen and until his or her successor
shall have been duly elected and qualified.
|
|
In the interim between annual meetings of shareholders or of
special meetings of shareholders called for the election of
directors, any vacancies in the board of directors, including
vacancies resulting from an increase in the authorized number of
directors which have not been filled by the shareholders,
including any other vacancies which the California General
Corporation Law authorizes directors to fill, and including
vacancies resulting from the removal of directors which are not
filled at the meeting of shareholders at which any such removal
has been effected, if the articles of incorporation or a bylaw
adopted by the shareholders so provides, may be filled by the
vote of a majority of directors then in office or of the sole
remaining director, although less than a quorum exists. Any
such directors elected to fill vacancies shall hold office until
the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their
successors have been elected and qualified, or until their
earlier resignation, removal from office, or death.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Action by Written Consent
|
|
SCMs certificate of incorporation prohibits the taking of
any action by written consent of the stockholders in lieu of a
meeting.
|
|
Hirschs bylaws allow any action which may be taken at an
annual or special meeting to be taken without a meeting, without
prior notice and without a vote, if a consent in writing,
setting forth the action so taken, is signed by the holders of
shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that
would be necessary to authorize such action at a meeting at
which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and
voted. Directors may not be elected by written consent except by
unanimous written consent of all shares entitled to vote for the
election of directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment of the Articles or Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
SCM reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any
provision contained in the certificate of incorporation.
|
|
Hirschs articles of incorporation may be amended in
accordance with the provisions of the California Corporations
Code.
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment of Bylaws
|
|
SCMs certificate of incorporation confers the power to adopt, amend, or repeal the bylaws upon the board of directors and the stockholders.
Any adoption, amendment, or repeal of the bylaws by the board of directors requires the approval of a majority of the total number of authorized directors. Any adoption, amendment, or repeal of the bylaws by the stockholders requires the approval of at least 662/3% of the capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.
|
|
Hirschs shareholders, exercising a majority of the voting
power, or its board of directors may amend, repeal or adopt new
bylaws, provided that the board of directors shall have no
control over any bylaw which fixes or changes the authorized
number of directors of the corporation. Any control of the
bylaws vested in the board of directors shall be subject to the
authority of the shareholders to amend or repeal the bylaws or
to adopt new bylaws. Any bylaw amendment or new bylaw which
changes the minimum number of directors to fewer than five
cannot be adopted if the votes cast against its adoption at a
meeting or the shares not consenting in writing in the case of
action by written consent are equal to more than sixteen and
two-thirds percent of the outstanding shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Meeting of Stockholders or Shareholders
|
|
SCMs bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders
may be called by the board of directors pursuant to a resolution
adopted by a majority of the total number of authorized
directors (whether or not any vacancies exist), or by the
holders of not less than 10% of all shares entitled to cast
votes at the meeting, voting together as a single class and
shall be held at such place, on such date, and at such time as
they shall fix.
|
|
Hirschs bylaws provide special meetings shall be held at
such place as the board of directors may, from time to time,
fix. If directors fail to fix such place, the meetings shall be
held at the principal executive office of Hirsch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Stockholder or Shareholder Meeting
|
|
Written notice must be given not less than ten, nor more than
60 days before the date on which the meeting is to be held.
|
|
Written notice must be given not less than ten days (or not less
than any such other minimum period of days as may be prescribed
by the California Corporations Code) before the date of the
meeting.
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery and Notice Requirements of Stockholder or
Shareholder Nominations and Proposals
|
|
SCMs bylaws provide that in order for stockholders to make
a proposal such proposal must be received by SCM not less than
120 calendar days in advance of the date that SCMs proxy
statement was released to stockholders in connection with the
previous years annual meeting of stockholders. If no
annual meeting was held in the previous year, or the date of the
annual meetings has been changed more than 30 calendar days from
the date contemplated in the previous years proxy
statement, or in the event of a special meeting, to be timely
received, notice from the stockholder must be received by SCM
not later than the close of business on the tenth day following
the day on which such notice of the date of the meeting was
mailed or such public disclosure is made.
|
|
The articles of incorporation and bylaws of Hirsch do not
provide for procedures with respect to shareholder proposals or
director nominations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declaration and Payment of Dividends
|
|
The bylaws of SCM provide that, subject to applicable law, the
board of directors may declare dividends from time to time.
|
|
Hirschs articles of incorporation and bylaws are silent on
the issue of dividends. Declaration and payment of dividends are
subject to limitations provided by the California Corporations
Code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indemnification of Directors and Officers; Advancement of
Expenses
|
|
The certificate of incorporation of SCM provides for the
indemnification of current and former directors, officers, and
employees of SCM, to the fullest extent authorized by Delaware
law. SCMs certificate of incorporation provides that SCM
may advance expenses to directors and officers upon receipt of
an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to
repay an amount so advanced if it should be determined
ultimately that such director or officer is not entitled to be
indemnified under the certificate of incorporation or otherwise.
|
|
The bylaws of Hirsch provide that Hirsch may indemnify any
director, officer, agent or employee as to those liabilities and
on those terms and conditions as are specified in Section 317 of
the California Corporations Code. The bylaws of Hirsch are
silent as to the advancement of expenses.
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder or Shareholder Rights Plan
|
|
SCM and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the
rights agent) entered into a Rights Agreement, dated
as of November 8, 2002, pursuant to which each common
stockholder received a dividend of one preferred share purchase
right to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of SCMs
series A participating preferred stock for each outstanding
share of SCM common stock held as of the record date. The
rights become exercisable if a person or group acquires 15% of
SCMs outstanding common stock, or announces a tender or
exchange offer the consummation of which would result in
ownership by a group or person of 15% or more of SCMs then
outstanding common stock.
|
|
Hirsch is not a party to any shareholder rights plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 10, 2008, SCM and the rights agent entered into the
first amendment to the rights agreement to provide that the
execution or delivery of the Merger Agreement and the public
announcement and consummation of the transactions contemplated
by the Merger Agreement and the ancillary agreements will not
cause: (i) the rights to purchase series A participating
preferred stock pursuant to the rights agreement to become
exercisable under the rights agreement; (ii) Hirsch or any of
its affiliates to be deemed an Acquiring Person (as
that term is used in the rights agreement); or (iii) a
Triggering Event, the Distribution Date or the Shares
Acquisition Date (as such terms are defined in the Rights
Agreement) to occur.
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-Takeover Provisions
|
|
Certain provisions of SCMs certificate of incorporation,
bylaws, the Delaware General Corporation Law, and SCMs
certain officers and directors of SCM may be deemed to have an
anti-takeover effect. Such provisions may delay, deter or
prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a stockholder
might consider to be in that stockholders best interests,
including attempts that might result in a premium over the
market price for the shares held by stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCMs board of directors may issue additional shares of SCM
common stock or establish one or more classes or series of
preferred stock, having the number of shares (up to 10,000,000),
designations, relative voting rights, dividend rates,
liquidation and other rights, preferences and limitations as
determined by SCMs board of directors without stockholder
approval.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCMs certificate of incorporation and bylaws also contain
a number of provisions that could impede a takeover or change in
control of SCM, including but not limited to the elimination of
stockholders ability to take action by written consent
without a meeting and the elimination of cumulative voting in
the election of directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, SCM is subject to the anti-takeover provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In
general, the statute prohibits a publicly-held Delaware
corporation from engaging in a business combination
with an interested stockholder for a period of three
years after the date of the transaction in which the person
became an interested stockholder, unless the business
combination is approved in a prescribed manner.
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with its listing on the Prime Standard of the
Frankfurt Stock Exchange, SCM is required to comply with the
German Code. Among other things, the German Code regulates
Public Offers, and requires companies seeking to make a Public
Offer to inform the German regulatory authorities and the public
of the offer, to provide certain disclosure to the target
SCMs stockholders, to generally treat stockholders equally
in an offer, and to comply with certain other regulatory
requirements. In addition, the German Code gives broad
authority to the German regulatory authorities to interpret the
German Code and to review and regulate specific Public Offers.
Compliance with the German Code could have the effect of
delaying, deferring or preventing a tender offer or takeover
attempt that a stockholder might consider to be in that
stockholders best interests, including attempts that might
result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by
stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each of the foregoing may have the effect of preventing or
rendering more difficult or costly, the completion of a takeover
transaction that stockholders might view as being in their best
interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Trading Policy
|
|
SCMs insider trading policies forbids insider trading. If
you will be an employee of SCM or the Surviving Subsidiary after
the closing of the Merger, your shares may be subject to these
insider trading policies.
|
|
|
206
THE SCM
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
General
SCM is sending you this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus as part of the solicitation of proxies
by SCMs board of directors for use at SCMs special
meeting of stockholders and any adjournments or postponements of
the meeting. SCM is first mailing this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus, including a
notice of the SCM special meeting of stockholders and a form of
proxy on or about February 18, 2009.
Date,
Time and Place of the SCM Special Meeting
The SCM special meeting is scheduled to be held on:
March 23,
2009 at 1:00 p.m., local time
at SCMs United States Office
41740 Christy Street
Fremont, California 94538
Purpose
of the SCM Special Meeting
At the SCM special meeting SCM common stockholders will be asked:
1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the
issuance of up to approximately 9,661,470 shares of SCM
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and warrants to
acquire an aggregate of approximately 4,945,353 shares of
SCM common stock to securityholders of Hirsch in connection with
the Merger and Merger Agreement, pursuant to which through a
two-step merger Hirsch will become a new Delaware limited
liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM.
2. To consider and vote upon an adjournment of the special
meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there
are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposal No. 1.
To transact such other business that properly comes before the
meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
SCMS BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU
VOTE FOR EACH OF PROPOSALS NO. 1 AND 2.
Proposals
to be Voted on at the SCM Special Meeting
Proposal No. 1:
The Merger Proposal
To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the issuance of
up to approximately 9,661,470 shares of SCM common stock,
par value $0.001 per share, and warrants to acquire an aggregate
of approximately 4,945,353 shares of SCM common stock to
securityholders of Hirsch in connection with the Merger and
Merger Agreement, pursuant to which through a two-step merger
Hirsch will become a new Delaware limited liability company and
a wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM.
Under NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4350(i), a company listed on
NASDAQ is required to obtain stockholder approval prior to the
issuance of common stock, among other things, in connection with
the acquisition of another companys stock, if the number
of shares of common stock to be issued is in excess of 20% of
the number of shares of common stock then outstanding. The newly
issued shares of SCM common stock to be issued in the Merger are
expected to exceed the 20% threshold under the NASDAQ
Marketplace Rules. Accordingly, in order to ensure compliance
with NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4350(i), SCM must obtain the
approval of SCM stockholders for the issuance of these
securities in the transaction.
207
SCMS BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU
VOTE FOR PROPOSAL NO. 1.
Proposal No. 2:
Adjournment
To consider and vote upon an adjournment of the special meeting,
if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes in favor of Proposal No. 1.
SCMS BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU
VOTE FOR PROPOSAL NO. 2.
Required
Vote for Approval of Proposal 1 and
Proposal 2
Approving Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of SCM common stock
present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote
at the special meeting at which a quorum is present. Each
stockholder of record on the SCM record date will be
entitled to one vote per share of common stock held on the
SCM record date on all matters submitted for consideration
of, and to be voted upon by, the stockholders at the special
meeting.
Record
Date; SCM Stockholders Entitled to Vote
SCMs board of directors has fixed February 11, 2009
as the record date for the SCM special meeting. Only
stockholders of record at the close of business on that date
will receive notice of and be able to vote at the SCM special
meeting. At the close of business on the record date, there were
15,743,515 shares of SCM common stock outstanding held by
approximately 55 record holders.
As of the record date, the directors and executive officers of
SCM beneficially owned approximately 11,683,452 shares of
SCM common stock, entitling them to exercise approximately 11%
of the voting power of the SCM common stock.
Quorum
The required quorum for the approval of the Proposals is
one-third (1/3) of the shares of SCMs common stock issued
and outstanding as of the SCM record date. Shares voted
FOR, AGAINST or WITHHELD
from a matter voted upon by the stockholders at the special
meeting will be treated as being present at the special meeting
for purposes of establishing a quorum for the transaction of
business, and will also be treated as shares represented
and voting at the special meeting (the Votes
Cast) with respect to any such matter.
Proxies;
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
You should complete and return the accompanying proxy card or
vote your proxy by telephone or the Internet, whether or not you
plan to attend the SCM special meeting in person. All properly
executed proxies received by SCM before the SCM special meeting
that are not revoked will be voted at the SCM special meeting in
accordance with the instructions indicated on the proxies or, if
no direction is indicated, FOR approval of the Proposals.
Properly executed proxies, other than proxies voting against
Proposal 2, also will be voted for any adjournment or
postponement of the SCM special meeting for the purpose of
soliciting additional votes to approve Proposal 1, if
necessary.
Properly executed proxies marked Abstain will not be
voted at the SCM special meeting. Abstentions will be counted
for purposes of determining both (i) the presence or
absence of the quorum for the approval of the Proposals, and
(ii) the total number of Votes Cast with respect to a
proposal. Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as
a vote against a proposal submitted for consideration of the
stockholders.
If your shares of SCM common stock are held in street
name by your broker, you must follow the directions your
broker provides to you regarding how to instruct your broker to
vote your shares of SCM common stock. You cannot vote shares of
SCM common stock held in street name by returning a
proxy card to SCM. In addition, a broker cannot vote shares of
SCM common stock it holds in street name for the
beneficial owners without specific
208
instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker non-votes will be
counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a
quorum for the approval of the Proposals, but will not be
counted for purposes of determining the number of Votes Cast
with respect to a proposal. Broker non-votes include
shares for which a bank, broker or other nominee holder has not
received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and for
which the nominee holder does not have discretionary power to
vote on a particular matter.
SCMs board of directors is not currently aware of any
business to be brought before the special meeting other than the
Proposals. However, if any other matters are properly brought
before the special meeting, the proxies named in the proxy card
will have discretion to vote the shares represented by duly
executed proxies in their sole discretion.
SCMs board of directors urges you to complete, date and
sign the accompanying proxy card and return it promptly in the
enclosed, pre-paid envelope or to alternatively vote your proxy
via the telephone or Internet voting instructions on your card.
If your shares of SCM common stock are held in street
name by your broker, you must follow the directions your
broker provides to you regarding how to instruct your broker to
vote your shares of SCM common stock. You cannot vote shares of
SCM common stock held in street name by returning a
proxy card to SCM.
Voting
and Revocation of Proxies
Voting
by Mail
By signing and returning the proxy card in the enclosed prepaid
and addressed envelope, you are authorizing individuals named on
the proxy card (each, a proxy) to vote your shares
at the meeting in the manner you indicate. SCM encourages you to
sign and return the proxy card even if you plan to attend the
meeting. In this way, your shares will be voted if you are
unable to attend the meeting. If you received more than one
proxy card, it is an indication that your shares are held in
multiple accounts. Please sign and return all proxy cards to
ensure that all of your shares are voted.
Voting
by Telephone
To vote by telephone, please follow the instructions included
with your proxy card. If you vote by telephone, you do not need
to complete and mail your proxy card.
Voting
over the Internet
To vote over the Internet, please follow the instructions
included with your proxy card. If you vote over the Internet,
you do not need to complete and mail your proxy card.
Voting
in Person
If you plan to attend the meeting and vote in person, SCM will
provide you with a ballot at the meeting. If your shares are
registered directly in your name, that is, you hold a share
certificate, you are considered the shareholder of record and
you have the right to vote in person at the meeting. If your
shares are held in the name of your broker or other nominee, you
are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street
name. As a beneficial owner, if you wish to vote at the meeting,
you will need to bring with you to the meeting a legal proxy
from your broker or other nominee authorizing you to vote such
shares. Contact your broker or other record holder of the shares
for assistance if this applies to you.
209
Your grant of a proxy on the enclosed proxy card does not
prevent you from voting in person or otherwise revoking your
proxy at any time before it is voted at the SCM special meeting.
To revoke your proxy, either:
|
|
|
|
|
Deliver a signed notice of revocation or a properly executed new
proxy card bearing a later date to:
|
In the
United States:
SCM
Microsystems, Inc.
41740 Christy Street
Fremont, CA 94538
+1
510-249-4883
ir@scmmicro.com
In Europe:
SCM
Microsystems GmbH
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13
85737 Ismaning, Germany
+49 89
9595-5220
ir@scmmicro.com
|
|
|
|
|
Attend the SCM special meeting and vote your shares in person.
|
Attendance at the SCM special meeting will not, in and of
itself, have the effect of revoking your proxy.
Appraisal
Rights and Dissenters Rights
SCM common stockholders are not entitled to dissenters
rights or appraisal rights under the Delaware General
Corporation Law in connection with the Merger.
Interests
of Certain Person in Matters to be Acted Upon
No director or executive officer of SCM since December 31,
2007, nor their associates, have any interests in the Proposals
that differ from, or are in addition to, their interests as SCM
common stockholders.
Solicitation
of Proxies and Expenses
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by SCM. SCM may
reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other persons representing
the beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding
solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Solicitation
of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone, telegram,
facsimile or personal solicitation by SCM directors, officers or
regular employees without additional compensation. Georgeson,
Inc., a U.S. and European proxy solicitation firm, has been
retained by SCM to assist it in the solicitation of proxies,
using the means referred to above, and will receive a fee of
30,000 for their services and reimbursement for
out-of-pocket expenses, as well as an additional fee of
30,000 upon approval of the Merger by the SCM stockholders.
210
THE
HIRSCH SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Hirsch is furnishing this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus to its shareholders in order to provide
important information regarding the matters to be considered at
the Hirsch special meeting of shareholders and at any
adjournment or postponement of the Hirsch special meeting.
Hirsch first mailed this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus and the accompanying form of proxy to
its shareholders on or about February 18, 2009.
Date,
Time and Place of the Hirsch Special Meeting
The Hirsch special meeting is scheduled to be held on:
March 11,
2009 at 7:30 p.m., local time
at Hirschs Corporate Headquarters
1900 Carnegie Avenue, Building B
Santa Ana, California 92705
Matters
to be Considered at the Hirsch Special Meeting
At the Hirsch special meeting, shareholders of Hirsch will be
asked to consider and vote upon the following two proposals:
Proposal No. 1:
The Merger Proposal
To consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated December 10, 2008, by and among
Hirsch, SCM Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(SCM), and two wholly-owned subsidiaries of SCM,
pursuant to which Hirsch will become a new Delaware limited
liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of SCM through a
two-step merger.
The Hirsch board of directors unanimously recommends that
Hirsch shareholders vote FOR Proposal No. 1 to adopt
the Merger Agreement.
Proposal No. 2:
The Adjournment Proposal
To vote upon an adjournment of the special meeting, if
necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies
if there are not sufficient votes in favor of the foregoing
Proposal No. 1.
The Hirsch board of directors unanimously recommends that
Hirsch shareholders vote FOR Proposal No. 2 to adjourn
the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in
favor of Proposal No. 1.
No other matters than those proposals described above will be
brought before the Hirsch special meeting.
Record
Date; Hirsch Shareholders Entitled to Vote
The record date for determining the Hirsch shareholders entitled
to vote at the Hirsch special meeting is February 10, 2009.
Holders of record of Hirsch common stock at the close of
business on that date are entitled to vote at the Hirsch special
meeting. On the Hirsch record date, there were issued and
outstanding 4,705,735 shares of Hirsch common stock.
As of the Hirsch record date, the directors and executive
officers of Hirsch and their affiliates held
1,021,456 shares of Hirsch common stock, representing
approximately 22% of the outstanding shares of Hirsch common
stock. Each Hirsch director and certain Hirsch executive
officers, and their affiliates, have entered into a voting
agreement in connection with the Merger and have executed
irrevocable proxies appointing SCM their lawful proxy and
attorney-in-fact to vote at any meeting of Hirsch shareholders
called for purposes of considering whether to approve the Merger
and Merger Agreement. For a more detailed discussion of the
voting agreement see
211
the section entitled Certain Agreements Related to the
Merger Irrevocable Proxy and Voting Agreement
in this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus.
Voting
and Revocation of Proxies
General
Shares represented by a properly signed and dated proxy will be
voted at the Hirsch special meeting in accordance with the
instructions indicated on the proxy. Proxies that are properly
signed but that do not contain voting instructions will be voted
FOR Proposal No. 1 to adopt the Merger Agreement and
FOR Proposal No. 2 to adjourn the Hirsch special
meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there
are not sufficient votes in favor of the foregoing
Proposal No. 1.
Abstentions
Hirsch will count a properly executed proxy marked ABSTAIN with
respect to a particular proposal as present for purposes of
determining whether a quorum is present, but the shares
represented by that proxy will not be voted at the Hirsch
special meeting with respect to such proposal. Because approval
of Proposal No. 1 requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, abstentions
on this proposal will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST
Proposal No. 1. Abstentions have no effect on the
determination of whether Proposal No. 2 has received
the vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present or
represented by proxy and voting at the meeting. However,
abstentions could prevent the approval of
Proposal No. 2 where the number of affirmative votes,
though a majority of the votes represented and cast, does not
constitute a majority of the required quorum.
Broker
Non-Votes
If your Hirsch shares are held by your broker, your broker will
vote your shares for you only if you provide instructions to
your broker on how to vote. You should follow the directions
provided by your broker regarding how to instruct your broker to
vote your shares. Your broker cannot vote your shares of Hirsch
common stock without specific instructions from you. Failure to
instruct your broker how to vote on Proposal No. 1
will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST
Proposal No. 1. Broker non-votes have no effect on the
determination of whether Proposal No. 2 has received
the vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present or
represented by proxy and voting at the meeting. However, broker
non-votes could prevent the approval of Proposal No. 2
where the number of affirmative votes, though a majority of the
votes represented and cast, does not constitute a majority of
the required quorum.
Voting
Shares in Person that are Held Through Brokers
If your shares are held of record by your broker, bank or
another nominee and you wish to vote those shares in person at
the Hirsch special meeting, you must obtain from the nominee
holding your shares a properly executed legal proxy identifying
you as a Hirsch shareholder, authorizing you to act on behalf of
the nominee at the Hirsch special meeting and identifying the
number of shares with respect to which the authorization is
granted.
Revocation
of Proxies
If you submit a proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it
is voted by:
|
|
|
|
|
delivering to the Secretary of Hirsch a written notice, dated
later than the proxy you wish to revoke, stating that the proxy
is revoked;
|
|
|
|
submitting to the Secretary of Hirsch a new, signed proxy with a
later date than the proxy you wish to revoke; or
|
|
|
|
attending the Hirsch special meeting and voting in person (your
attendance alone will not revoke your proxy).
|
212
Notices to the Secretary of Hirsch should be addressed to Hirsch
Electronics Corporation, 1900 Carnegie Avenue, Building B, Santa
Ana, California 92705, Attention: Secretary.
If you have instructed your broker to vote your shares, you must
follow directions received from your broker to change those
instructions.
Required
Shareholder Vote; Quorum
In order to conduct business at the Hirsch special meeting, a
quorum must be present. The holders of a majority of the votes
entitled to be cast by holders of common stock at the Hirsch
special meeting, present in person or represented by proxy,
constitute a quorum under Hirschs bylaws. Hirsch will
treat shares of common stock represented by a properly signed
and returned proxy, including abstentions and broker non-votes,
as present at the Hirsch special meeting for the purposes of
determining the existence of a quorum.
With respect to any matter submitted to a vote of the Hirsch
shareholders, each holder of Hirsch common stock will be
entitled to one vote, in person or by proxy, for each share of
Hirsch common stock held in his, her or its name on the books of
Hirsch on the record date.
Approval of Proposal No. 1 requires the affirmative
vote of a majority of the shares of Hirsch common stock
outstanding on the Hirsch record date.
Approval of Proposal No. 2 requires the affirmative
vote of holders of a majority of the votes of the outstanding
shares of Hirsch common stock present in person or represented
by proxy at the Hirsch special meeting that are voted for or
against proposal No. 2, provided that the shares
voting affirmatively also constitute at least a majority of the
required quorum.
Board of
Directors Unanimous Recommendations
After careful consideration, the Hirsch board of directors has
determined that the Merger Agreement is advisable and in the
best interests of Hirsch and its shareholders. The Hirsch
board of directors unanimously recommends that Hirsch
shareholders vote FOR Proposal No. 1 to adopt the
Merger Agreement and FOR Proposal No. 2 to adjourn the
special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in
favor of Proposal No. 1.
The matters to be considered at the Hirsch special meeting are
of great importance to the shareholders of Hirsch. Accordingly,
Hirsch urges its shareholders to read and carefully consider the
information presented in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus, and to properly complete and submit
the proxy.
Hirsch shareholders should not submit any stock certificates at
this time. A transmittal form with instructions for the
surrender of stock certificates for Hirsch stock will be mailed
to Hirsch shareholders as soon as practicable after completion
of the Merger.
Solicitation
of Proxies
The proxy accompanying this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus is solicited on behalf of the Hirsch
board of directors for use at the Hirsch special meeting. Hirsch
will pay for the cost of soliciting proxies from its
shareholders. In addition to solicitation by mail, the
directors, officers, employees and agents of Hirsch may solicit
proxies from Hirsch shareholders by personal interview,
telephone, telegram or otherwise. Hirsch has retained Robert
Parsons, a shareholder of Hirsch, to solicit proxies for a fee
of approximately $10,000. Arrangements may also be made with
brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries
who are record holders of Hirsch common stock for the forwarding
of solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of Hirsch
common stock to reimburse these brokers, custodians, nominees
and fiduciaries for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses they
incur in connection with the forwarding of solicitation
materials.
Hirsch shareholders are advised to thoroughly read all available
documents and materials regarding the Merger, including the
sections entitled The Merger Interests of
Hirsch Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger and
The Merger Appraisal Rights and
Dissenters Rights in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus.
213
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
SCM
Microsystems
SCM files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and
copy these reports, statements or other information filed by SCM
at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information regarding the public reference rooms.
The SEC filings of SCM are also available to the public from
commercial document retrieval services and at the website
maintained by the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
SCM stockholders may request a copy of such documents in writing
or by calling SCM Microsystems at +1
510-249-4883,
emailing SCM at ir@scmmicro.com or writing to SCM Microsystems,
Inc., 41740 Christy Street, Fremont, California 94538,
Attention: Investor Relations.
SCM is filing this joint proxy statement as part of a
registration statement on
Form S-4
regarding the Merger with the SEC. This joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus constitutes a
prospectus of SCM, in addition to being a proxy statement of SCM
and an information statement of Hirsch for their respective
stockholder and shareholder meetings. The registration
statement, including the attached annexes, exhibits and
schedules, contains additional relevant information about SCM,
SCM common stock and Hirsch. Investors and securityholders are
urged to read the joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus because it will contain important information
about SCM and Hirsch and the proposed transaction. As allowed by
the SEC rules, this joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus does not contain all the information you can find
in the registration statement or the exhibits to the
registration statement.
SCM incorporates by reference (i) the Merger Agreement
attached to this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus as Annex A; (ii) the Irrevocable
Proxy and Voting Agreement attached to this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus as
Annex B; (iii) the Stockholder Agreement
attached to this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus as Annex C; (iv) the Written Opinion
of Avondale Partners attached to this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus as
Annex E; (v) the Written Opinion of Imperial
Capital, LLC attached to this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus as Annex F. (vi) the
First Amendment to SCM Rights Agreement attached to this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus as
Annex G; (vii) Settlement Agreement between
Hirsch Electronics Corporation, Secure Keyboards, Ltd. and
Secure Networks, Ltd. attached to this joint proxy/information
statement and prospectus as Annex H;
(viii) Amended and Restated Letters of Understanding
between SCM and each of Secure Keyboards, Ltd. and Secure
Networks, Ltd. attached to this joint proxy/information
statement and prospectus as Annex I;
(ix) Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement between
SCM and Lawrence W. Midland attached to this joint
proxy/information statement and prospectus as
Annex J; (x) Employment Agreement between
Hirsch Electronics Corporation and Robert Beliles attached to
this joint proxy/information statement and prospectus as
Annex K; (xi) Employment Agreement between
Hirsch Electronics Corporation and Larry Midland attached to
this joint proxy/information statement and prospectus as
Annex L; (xii) Employment Agreement between
Hirsch Electronics Corporation and John Piccininni attached to
this joint proxy/information statement and prospectus as
Annex M; and (xiii) Employment Agreement
between Hirsch Electronics Corporation and Rob Zivney attached
to this joint proxy/information statement and prospectus as
Annex N. Documents incorporated by reference are
available from SCM without charge, excluding any exhibits to
those documents, unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated
by reference in this joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus. SCM stockholders may request a copy of such
documents in writing or by calling SCM Microsystems at +1
510-249-4883,
emailing SCM at ir@scmmicro.com or writing to SCM Microsystems,
Inc., 41740 Christy Street, Fremont, California 94538,
Attention: Investor Relations.
SCM has supplied all information contained in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus relating to SCM,
and Hirsch has supplied all information contained in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus relating to
Hirsch. SCM is not incorporating the contents of its website,
the website of Hirsch, the website of the SEC, or any other
website into this joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus.
214
IN ORDER FOR YOU TO RECEIVE TIMELY DELIVERY OF THE DOCUMENTS IN
ADVANCE OF SCMS SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OR
HIRSCHS SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS, SCM SHOULD
RECEIVE YOUR REQUEST NO LATER THAN MARCH 17, 2009, AND
HIRSCH SHOULD RECEIVE YOUR REQUEST NO LATER THAN MARCH 6,
2009.
Hirsch
Electronics
Hirsch does not have securities registered under Section 12
of the Securities Act of 1933, and is not subject to the
reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act.
Other
Information
The joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus
will be mailed to stockholders of SCM and shareholders of
Hirsch. Investors and securityholders may obtain a free copy of
the definitive joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus and other documents when filed with the SEC at the
SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
The joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus
and other relevant documents may also be obtained free of charge
|
|
|
|
|
from SCM: by calling SCM at +1
510-249-4883,
emailing SCM at ir@scmmicro.com or writing to SCM Microsystems,
Inc., 41740 Christy Street, Fremont, California 94538,
Attention: Investor Relations, or
|
|
|
|
from Hirsch: by calling Hirsch at +1
949-250-8888
ext. 106, emailing Hirsch at secretary@hirschelectronics.com or
writing to Hirsch Electronics Corporations, 1900 Carnegie
Avenue, Building B, Santa Ana, California 92705, Attention:
Secretary.
|
We have not authorized anyone to give any information or make
any representation about the Merger or SCM or Hirsch that is
different from, or in addition to, that contained in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus. Therefore,
if anyone does give you information of this kind, you should not
rely on it. If you are in a jurisdiction where offers to
exchange or sell, or solicitations of offers to exchange or
purchase, the securities offered by this joint proxy
statement/information statement or prospectus or the
solicitation of proxies is unlawful, or if you are a person to
whom it is unlawful to direct these types of activities, then
the offer presented in this joint proxy statement/information
statement and prospectus does not extend to you. The information
contained in this joint proxy statement/information statement
and prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus unless the
information specifically indicates that another date applies.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the SCM Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on
March 23, 2009 and the Hirsch Shareholder Meeting to Be
Held on March 11, 2009.
The joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus is available at www.scmmicro.com.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of SCM common stock and warrants to
purchase SCM common stock being offered by this proxy
statement/prospectus will be passed upon for SCM by Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher LLP. It is a condition to the
consummation of the Merger that Hirsch and SCM have received the
opinion of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, to the effect
that, on the basis of the facts, representations and assumptions
set forth or referred to in such opinion, the Merger will for
U.S. federal income tax purposes constitute a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
EXPERTS
The financial statements of SCM Microsystems, Inc. as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2007 and the related
financial statement schedule included in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus, have been
audited by Deloitte & Touche GmbH, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports
and are included in reliance upon the reports of such firm given
upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
215
The financial statements of Hirsch Electronics Corporation as of
and for the years ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006
included in this joint proxy statement/information statement and
prospectus, have been audited by Squar, Milner, Peterson,
Miranda & Williamson, LLP, independent auditors, as
stated in their report, which is included elsewhere in this
joint proxy statement/information statement and prospectus, and
have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm
given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
216
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of SCM Microsystems, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
SCM Microsystems, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in
the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SCM
Microsystems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007
and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
DELOITTE & TOUCHE GMBH
WIRTSCHAFTSPRÜFUNGSGESELLSCHAFT
|
Munich, Germany
March 18, 2008
F-2
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
18,600
|
|
|
$
|
32,103
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
13,844
|
|
|
|
4,799
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $341 and $867 as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
8,638
|
|
|
|
6,583
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
45,275
|
|
|
|
47,901
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
48,564
|
|
|
$
|
51,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,063
|
|
|
$
|
4,572
|
|
Accrued compensation and related benefits
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
Accrued restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
3,431
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
Accrued royalties
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
11,248
|
|
|
|
15,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Long-term income taxes payable
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 12 and 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 40,000 shares
authorized; 16,356 and 16,316 shares issued and 15,737 and
15,698 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
229,414
|
|
|
|
228,580
|
|
Treasury stock, 618 shares
|
|
|
(2,777
|
)
|
|
|
(2,777
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(192,089
|
)
|
|
|
(191,714
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
37,039
|
|
|
|
35,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
48,564
|
|
|
$
|
51,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
30,435
|
|
|
$
|
33,613
|
|
|
$
|
27,936
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
17,781
|
|
|
|
21,756
|
|
|
|
17,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
11,857
|
|
|
|
10,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
3,767
|
|
|
|
4,081
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
7,498
|
|
|
|
7,040
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
7,132
|
|
|
|
7,548
|
|
|
|
9,198
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
17,126
|
|
|
|
20,599
|
|
|
|
21,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(4,472
|
)
|
|
|
(8,742
|
)
|
|
|
(10,481
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
Foreign currency gains (losses) and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,179
|
)
|
|
|
(7,617
|
)
|
|
|
(8,005
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(3,292
|
)
|
|
|
(7,690
|
)
|
|
|
(8,155
|
)
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
3,508
|
|
|
|
(2,109
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
5,224
|
|
|
|
(2,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,042
|
|
|
$
|
(12,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from discontinued
operations
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute basic and diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
|
15,725
|
|
|
|
15,638
|
|
|
|
15,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balances, January 1, 2005
|
|
|
15,484
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
227,398
|
|
|
$
|
(2,777
|
)
|
|
$
|
(180,321
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,514
|
|
|
$
|
46,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain on investments adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,236
|
)
|
|
|
(2,236
|
)
|
|
|
(2,236
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,435
|
)
|
|
|
(12,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
15,593
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
227,676
|
|
|
$
|
(2,777
|
)
|
|
$
|
(192,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
$
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
15,698
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
228,580
|
|
|
$
|
(2,777
|
)
|
|
$
|
(191,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,213
|
|
|
$
|
35,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Accumulated Deficit resulting from the adoption of
FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(659
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
15,737
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
229,414
|
|
|
$
|
(2,777
|
)
|
|
$
|
(192,089
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,475
|
|
|
$
|
37,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,042
|
|
|
$
|
(12,435
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,371
|
)
|
|
|
(8,732
|
)
|
|
|
4,280
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,937
|
)
|
|
|
(2,388
|
)
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
(1,021
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
367
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,043
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
(1,990
|
)
|
|
|
(5,402
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(5,990
|
)
|
|
|
(10,345
|
)
|
|
|
(8,218
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
10,524
|
|
|
|
(4,595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(5,444
|
)
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
(12,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
Sales and maturities of short-term investments
|
|
|
19,587
|
|
|
|
16,918
|
|
|
|
12,055
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(28,647
|
)
|
|
|
(2,878
|
)
|
|
|
(15,851
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(9,260
|
)
|
|
|
13,978
|
|
|
|
(3,472
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,484
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(9,260
|
)
|
|
|
17,462
|
|
|
|
(3,489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of equity securities, net
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(13,503
|
)
|
|
|
18,443
|
|
|
|
(17,521
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
32,103
|
|
|
|
13,660
|
|
|
|
31,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
18,600
|
|
|
$
|
32,103
|
|
|
$
|
13,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax refunds received
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
DECEMBER
31, 2007
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
SCM Microsystems (SCM or the Company)
was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in
December 1996. SCMs principal business activity is the
design, development and sale of hardware, software and silicon
solutions that enable people to conveniently and securely access
digital content and services. The Company sells its products
primarily in two market segments: PC Security and Digital Media
and Connectivity. In the PC Security market, the Company
provides smart card reader technology that enables secure access
to PCs, networks and physical facilities, as well as smart
card-based productivity packages for small- and medium-sized
businesses under the CHIPDRIVE brand. In the Digital Media and
Connectivity market, the Company provides digital media readers
that are used to transfer digital content to and from various
digital flash media. SCMs target customers are primarily
original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, who typically either
bundle the Companys products with their own solutions, or
repackage the products for resale to their customers. OEM
customers include: government contractors, systems integrators,
large enterprises, computer manufacturers, as well as banks and
other financial institutions for SCMs smart card readers;
and computer and photo processing equipment manufacturers for
the Companys digital media readers. The Company sells its
CHIPDRIVE solutions through resellers and the Internet. SCM
sells and licenses its products through a direct sales and
marketing organization, as well as through distributors,
value-added resellers and system integrators worldwide.
SCM maintains its corporate headquarters in Ismaning, Germany,
with additional facilities in India for research and development
and in the United States and Japan for sales and marketing.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of
Presentation The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of SCM and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Discontinued Operations The financial
information related to SCMs former Digital Television
solutions (DTV solutions) business and retail
Digital Media and Video business is reported as discontinued
operations for all periods presented as discussed in Note 3.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires SCMs
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Such management estimates include
an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, provision for
inventory, lower of cost or market adjustments, valuation
allowances against deferred income taxes, estimates related to
recovery of long-lived assets and accruals of product warranty,
restructuring reserves and accruals, and other liabilities.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash Equivalents SCM considers all highly
liquid debt investments with maturities of three months or less
at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents.
Short-term Investments Short-term investments
consist of corporate notes and United States government agency
instruments, and are stated at fair value based on quoted market
prices. Short-term investments are classified as
available-for-sale. The difference between amortized cost and
fair value representing unrealized holding gains or losses is
recorded as a component of stockholders equity as other
cumulative comprehensive gain or loss. Gains and losses on sales
of investments are determined on a specific identification
basis. Short-term investments are evaluated for impairment on a
quarterly basis and are written down to their fair value when
impairment indicators present are considered to be other than
temporary.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
SCMs financial instruments include cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, trade receivables and
payables, and long-term investments. At December 31, 2007
and 2006, the fair value of cash and cash equivalents, trade
receivables and payables approximated their financial statement
F-7
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
carrying amounts because of the short-term maturities of these
instruments. (See Note 4 for fair value of investments.)
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower of standard cost, which approximates cost, or market
value. Cost is determined on the
first-in,
first-out method. An estimated provision is recorded for excess
inventory, technical obsolescence and unsellability based
primarily on historical sales and expectations for future use.
Once inventory has been written down below cost, it is not
subsequently written up.
Property and Equipment Property and equipment
are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed
using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of
three to five years except for buildings which are depreciated
over twenty-five to thirty years. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the shorter of the lease term or their useful
life.
Intangible and Long-lived Assets The Company
evaluates long-lived assets under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived
Assets. SCM evaluates its long-lived assets and certain
identifiable intangibles for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
such assets or intangibles may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net
undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset. If
such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the assets exceed the fair value of the assets.
Intangible assets with definite lives are being amortized using
the straight-line method over the useful lives of the related
assets, from two to five years.
Product warranties The Company accrues the
estimated cost of product warranties during the period of sale.
The Companys warranty obligation is affected by actual
warranty costs, including material usage or service delivery
costs incurred in correcting a product failure. If actual
material usage or service delivery costs differ from estimates,
revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.
Revenue Recognition SCM recognizes revenue
pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
No. 104, Revenue Recognition. Accordingly, revenue
from product sales is recognized upon product shipment, provided
that risk and title have transferred, a purchase order has been
received, the sales price is fixed and determinable and
collection of the resulting receivable is probable. Maintenance
revenue is deferred and amortized ratably over the period of the
maintenance contract. Provisions for estimated warranty repairs
and returns and allowances are provided for at the time products
are shipped.
Research and Development Research and
development expenses are expensed as incurred and consist
primarily of employee compensation and fees for the development
of prototype products.
Freight Costs SCM reflects the cost of
shipping its products to customers as cost of revenue.
Reimbursements received from customers for freight costs are not
significant, but when received are recognized in revenue.
Income Taxes SCM accounts for income taxes in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, which requires the asset and liability approach for
financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is provided
to reduce the net deferred tax asset to an amount that is more
likely than not to be realized. At December 31, 2007, a
full valuation allowance was provided against the net deferred
tax assets.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company adopted the
provisions of, and accounted for uncertain tax positions in
accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Boards
(FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting For
Uncertain Tax Positions (FIN 48).
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. It prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
F-8
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. Differences between the amounts
recognized in the statements of financial position prior to the
adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts reported after adoption
are to be accounted for as an adjustment to the beginning
balance of retained earnings.
FIN 48 requires the Company to make certain judgments and
estimates in determining income tax expense for financial
statement purposes. Significant changes to these estimates may
result in an increase or decrease to SCMs tax provision in
a subsequent period. The calculation of SCMs tax
liabilities requires dealing with uncertainties in the
application of complex tax regulations. FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It is
inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts.
SCM reevaluates such uncertain tax positions on a quarterly
basis based on factors such as, but not limited to, changes in
tax laws, issues settled under audit and changes in facts or
circumstances. Such changes in recognition or measurement might
result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional
charge to the tax provision in the period. As a result of the
implementation, the Company recognized a $1.5 million
decrease to income taxes payable for uncertain tax positions.
This decrease was accounted for as an adjustment to the
beginning balance of accumulated deficit on the balance sheet.
Including this decrease, at the beginning of 2007, the Company
had $0.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits included in
income taxes payable on the consolidated balance sheet. See
Note 9 for further information regarding the Companys
tax disclosures.
Stock-based Compensation During the first
quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of,
and accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with,
SFAS No. 123 revised 2004
(SFAS 123(R)), Share-Based Payment,
which replaced SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25
(APB 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. Under the fair value recognition provisions of
this statement, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the
grant date based on the fair value of the award and is
recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period, which is the vesting period. The
Company elected to use the modified-prospective method, under
which prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes.
The valuation provisions of SFAS 123(R) apply to new grants
and to grants that were outstanding as of the effective date and
are subsequently modified. Estimated compensation for grants
that were outstanding as of the effective date will be
recognized over the remaining service period using the
compensation cost estimated for the SFAS 123 pro forma
disclosures.
The adoption of SFAS 123(R) did not have a material impact
on the Companys consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows. See Note 2 for further
information regarding the Companys stock-based
compensation assumptions and expenses, including pro forma
disclosures for prior periods as if the Company had recorded
stock-based compensation expense in accordance with
SFAS 123.
Net Income or Loss Per Share Basic and
diluted net income or loss per share is based upon the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net income per share is based upon the weighted average
number of common shares and dilutive-potential common share
equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive-potential
common share equivalents are excluded from the computation in
loss periods as their effect would be antidilutive. If there is
a loss from continuing operations, diluted net income per share
would be computed in the same manner as basic net income per
share is computed, even if an entity has net income after
adjusting for a discontinued operation, an extraordinary item,
or the cumulative effect of an accounting change.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
The functional currencies of SCMs foreign subsidiaries are
the local currencies, except for the Singapore subsidiary, which
uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency. The books
of record of the Singapore subsidiary are maintained in its
functional currency, the U.S. dollar. For those
subsidiaries whose functional currency is the local currency,
SCM translates assets and liabilities to U.S. dollars using
period-end exchange rates and translate revenues and expenses
using average exchange rates during the period. Exchange gains
and losses arising from translation of foreign entity financial
statements are included as a component of other comprehensive
income (loss). Gains and losses from transactions denominated in
currencies
F-9
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
other than the functional currencies of SCM or its subsidiaries
are included in other income and expense. SCM recorded a
currency loss of $0.3 million in 2007, a currency loss of
$0.3 million in 2006 and a currency gain of
$1.6 million in 2005.
Concentration of Credit Risk Financial
instruments that potentially expose the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable and short-term investments.
SCMs cash equivalents primarily consist of money market
accounts and commercial paper with maturities of less than three
months. SCM primarily sells its products to companies in the
United States, Asia and Europe. Two U.S. based customer
represented 30% and 15%, respectively of the accounts receivable
balance at December 31, 2007. The Company does not require
collateral or other security to support accounts receivable. To
reduce risk, SCMs management performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers financial condition. SCM
maintains allowances for potential credit losses.
Comprehensive Gain (Loss)
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income
requires an enterprise to report, by major components and as a
single total, the change in net assets during the period from
non-owner sources. Comprehensive income (loss) for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 has been disclosed
within the consolidated statements of stockholders equity
and comprehensive income (loss).
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of
SFAS 157 are effective for the fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2008. After evaluating the impact of the
provisions of SFAS 157 on its financial position, results
of operations and cash flows, the Company does not expect a
material impact from its adoption.
In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits companies to
choose to measure certain financial instruments and other items
at fair value. The standard requires that unrealized gains and
losses are reported in earnings for items measured using the
fair value option. SFAS No. 159 is effective for SCM
beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. After
evaluating the impact of the provisions of SFAS 159 on its
financial position, results of operations and cash flows, the
Company does not expect a material impact from its adoption.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations. Under
SFAS No. 141(R), an entity is required to recognize
the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual
contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value
on the acquisition date. It further requires that
acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the
acquisition and expensed as incurred, restructuring costs
generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition
date, and changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the
measurement period impact income tax expense. In addition,
acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D) is
capitalized as an intangible asset and amortized over its
estimated useful life. The adoption of SFAS No. 141(R)
will change SCMs accounting treatment for business
combinations on a prospective basis beginning in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an Amendment of ARB No. 51.
SFAS No. 160 changes the accounting and reporting for
minority interests, which will be recharacterized as
non-controlling interests and classified as a component of
equity. SFAS No. 160 is effective for SCM on a
prospective basis for business combinations with an acquisition
date beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. As of
December 31, 2007, SCM did not have any minority interests.
F-10
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Stockholders
Equity and Stock-Based Compensation
|
Stockholders
Rights Plan
On November 8, 2002, SCMs Board of Directors approved
a stockholders rights plan. Under the plan, the Company declared
a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each share
of the Companys common stock held by SCM stockholders of
record as of the close of business on November 25, 2002.
Each preferred share purchase right entitles the holder to
purchase from SCM one one-thousandth of a share of Series A
participating preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a
price of $30.00, subject to adjustment. The rights are not
immediately exercisable, however, and will become exercisable
only upon the occurrence of certain events. If a person or group
acquires, or announces a tender or exchange offer that would
result in the acquisition of 15% or more of SCMs common
stock while the stockholder rights plan remains in place, then,
unless the rights are redeemed by SCM for $0.001 per right, the
rights will become exercisable by all rights holders except the
acquiring person or group for shares of the Company or the
third-party acquirer having a value of twice the rights
then- current exercise price. The stockholder rights plan may
have the effect of deterring or delaying a change in control of
the Company.
Stock-Based
Compensation Plans
The Company has a stock-based compensation program that provides
its Board of Directors discretion in creating employee equity
incentives. This program includes incentive and non-statutory
stock options under various plans, the majority of which are
stockholder approved. Stock options are generally time-based and
expire seven to ten years from the date of grant. Vesting
varies, with some options vesting 25% each year over four years;
some vesting
1/12th per
month over one year; some vesting 100% after one year; and some
vesting
1/12th per
month, commencing four years from the date of grant.
Additionally, the Company previously had an Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (ESPP) that allowed employees to
purchase shares of common stock at 85% of the fair market value
at the lower of either the date of enrolment or the date of
purchase. Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises
and the ESPP are newly issued shares. The Companys ESPP,
director option plan and 1997 stock option plan all expired in
March 2007. In 2007, SCMs Board of Directors and its
stockholders approved the Companys 2007 stock option plan,
under which options to purchase 1.5 million shares of SCM
common stock may be granted. As of December 31, 2007, an
aggregate of approximately 3.4 million shares of common
stock was reserved for future issuance under the Companys
stock option plans, of which 1.9 million shares were
subject to outstanding options.
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provision of
SFAS 123(R) for its share-based compensation plans. Under
SFAS 123(R), the Company is required to recognize
stock-based compensation costs based on the estimated fair value
at the grant date for its share-based awards. In accordance to
this standard, the Company recognizes the compensation cost of
all share-based awards on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period which is the vesting period of the
award.
The Company elected to use the modified prospective transition
method as permitted by SFAS 123(R) and therefore has not
restated its financial results for prior periods. Under this
transition method, in the two years ended December 31,
2007, the compensation cost recognized includes the cost for all
stock-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet
vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair
value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of
SFAS 123. Compensation cost for all share-based
compensation awards granted on or subsequent to January 1,
2006 was based on the grant-date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). In
conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company
changed its method of attributing the value of stock-based
compensation to expense from the accelerated multiple-option
approach to the straight-line single option method. Compensation
expense for all share-based payment awards granted prior to
January 1, 2006 will continue to be recognized using the
accelerated multiple-option approach while compensation expense
for all share-based payment awards granted on or subsequent to
January 1, 2006 has been and will continue to be recognized
using the straight-line single-option approach.
F-11
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement of
operations in the two years ended December 31, 2007 is
based on awards ultimately expected to vest and reflects
estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to
be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. Prior to adoption of SFAS 123(R) the Company
accounted for forfeitures as they occurred.
In calculating the compensation cost, the Company estimates the
fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton options pricing model. The
Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model was developed for use
in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no
vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
the Black-Scholes-Merton model requires the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price
volatility.
As a result of adopting SFAS 123(R), the Companys
loss from continuing operations before the income tax provision
and net loss from discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $0.7 million and
$0.6 million greater, respectively, than it would have been
had the Company continued to account for share-based
compensation under APB 25. Basic and diluted net loss per share
from continuing operations for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 would have been $0.05 and $0.04 lower,
respectively, if the Company had not adopted SFAS 123(R).
There was no effect on the condensed consolidated statements of
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
from adopting SFAS 123(R).
On November 10, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 123(R)-3 (SFAS 123(R)-3),
Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of
Share-Based Payment Awards. The Company has elected to adopt
the alternative transition method provided in the FASB Staff
Position for calculating the tax effects of stock-based
compensation pursuant to SFAS 123(R). The alternative
transition method includes simplified methods to establish the
beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool
(APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee
stock-based compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact
on the APIC pool and consolidated statements of cash flows of
the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that
are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS 123(R).
The following table illustrates the stock-based compensation
expense resulting from stock options and shares issued under the
ESPP included in the audited condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
632
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense after income taxes
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Option Plans
The Companys director option plan and 1997 stock option
plan expired in March 2007, and options can no longer be granted
under these plans. In November 2007, stockholders approved the
2007 Stock Option Plan, which authorizes 1.5 million stock
option grants.
F-12
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A total of 1,493,493 shares of common stock are reserved
for future option grants under the remaining 2000 stock plan and
the new 2007 stock option plan as of December 31, 2007.
A summary of the activity under the Companys stock option
plans for the three years ended December 31, 2007 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
for Grant
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 (1,936,445 exercisable at
$27.03)
|
|
|
2,898,231
|
|
|
|
2,927,586
|
|
|
$
|
19.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Authorized
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
(331,928
|
)
|
|
|
331,928
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Cancelled or Expired
|
|
|
435,005
|
|
|
|
(435,005
|
)
|
|
$
|
28.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,748
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.31
|
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 (2,099,539 exercisable at
$20.56)
|
|
|
3,036,308
|
|
|
|
2,822,761
|
|
|
$
|
16.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Authorized
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
(376,794
|
)
|
|
|
376,794
|
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Cancelled or Expired
|
|
|
1,390,261
|
|
|
|
(1,390,261
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,039
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
$
|
8,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 (1,208,481 exercisable at
$17.02)
|
|
|
4,084,775
|
|
|
|
1,783,255
|
|
|
$
|
12.58
|
|
|
$
|
81,808
|
|
|
|
5.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Authorized
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
(506,181
|
)
|
|
|
506,181
|
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Cancelled or Expired
|
|
|
(3,585,101
|
)
|
|
|
(414,726
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,438
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.05
|
|
|
$
|
9,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,493,493
|
|
|
|
1,862,272
|
|
|
$
|
10.97
|
|
|
$
|
191,809
|
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750,662
|
|
|
$
|
11.44
|
|
|
$
|
172,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,260,320
|
|
|
$
|
14.51
|
|
|
$
|
91,528
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about options
outstanding as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Exercise
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
Price
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Price
|
|
$ 2.65 - $ 3.03
|
|
388,014
|
|
7.82
|
|
$2.89
|
|
155,590
|
|
$2.83
|
$ 3.05 - $ 3.41
|
|
389,047
|
|
6.64
|
|
3.31
|
|
309,467
|
|
3.33
|
$ 3.44 - $ 5.15
|
|
394,807
|
|
7.92
|
|
4.28
|
|
109,146
|
|
4.69
|
$ 5.86 - $ 12
|
|
377,596
|
|
3.96
|
|
8.01
|
|
373,309
|
|
8.04
|
$ 14.60 - $83.00
|
|
312,808
|
|
1.58
|
|
42.51
|
|
312,808
|
|
42.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2.65 - $83.00
|
|
1,862,272
|
|
5.77
|
|
$10.97
|
|
1,260,320
|
|
$14.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The weighted-average grant date fair value per option for
options granted during the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005 was $1.80, $1.71 and $2.76, respectively. The
total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $9,085, $8,716
and $1,901, respectively. Cash proceeds from the exercise of
stock options were $38,000, $72,000 and $5,800 for the three
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, an income tax benefit
from the stock option exercises of below $1,000 was realized. No
income tax benefit was realized from the stock option exercises
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. Stock-based
compensation expense related to stock options recognized under
SFAS 123(R) for the two years ended December 31, 2007
and 2006 was $0.7 million and $0.6 million,
respectively. At December 31, 2007, there was
$0.7 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation
expense, net of estimated forfeitures related to non-vested
options, that is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.72 years.
The fair value of option grants was estimated by using the
Black-Scholes-Merton model with the following weighted-average
assumptions for the three years ended December 31, 2007,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
4.81
|
%
|
|
|
3.84
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
Expected term in years
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Expected Volatility: The Companys
computation of expected volatility for the year ended
December 31, 2007 is based on the historical volatility of
the Companys stock for a time period equivalent to the
expected life. Prior to the year ended December 31, 2007,
the Company had used its historical stock price volatility in
accordance with SFAS 123 for purposes of its pro forma
information.
Dividend Yield: The dividend yield assumption
is based on the Companys history and expectation of
dividend payouts.
Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free
interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option.
Expected Term: The Companys expected
term represents the period that the Companys stock-based
awards are expected to be outstanding and was determined for the
year ended December 31, 2007 based on historical experience
of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms
of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of
future employee behavior. Stock options are generally granted
with vesting periods between one and five years.
Forfeiture Rates: Compensation expense
recognized in the consolidated statement of operations for the
two years ended December 31, 2007 is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, and reflects estimated forfeitures.
SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the
time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods
if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Prior to
adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for
forfeitures as they occurred.
1997
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Until its expiration in March 2007, the Companys ESPP
permitted eligible employees to purchase common stock through
payroll deductions up to 10% of their base wages at a purchase
price of 85% of the lower of fair market value of the common
stock at the beginning or end of each offering period. The
Company had a two-year rolling plan with four purchases every
six months within the offering period. If the fair market value
per share was lower on the purchase date than the beginning of
the offering period, the current offering period terminated and
a new two year offering period would have commenced. The
Companys ESPP restricted the maximum amount of shares
purchased by an individual to $25,000 worth of common stock each
year. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, a total of 27,145, 78,679 and
107,526 shares, respectively, were issued under the plan.
As of December 31, 2007, no shares were available for
future issuance under the Companys ESPP, due to the
plans expiration in March 2007.
F-14
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of issuances under the Companys ESPP was
estimated on the issuance date by applying the principles of
FASB Technical
Bulletin 97-1
(FTB
97-1),
Accounting under Statement 123 for Certain Employee Stock
Purchase Plan with a Look Back Option, and using the
Black-Scholes-Merton options pricing model. Stock-based
compensation expense related to the Companys ESPP
recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was a benefit of $40,000. The benefit
stemmed from the expiration of the plan before the expected
offering periods had terminated. At December 31, 2007,
there was no further unrecognized stock-based compensation
expense related to outstanding ESPP shares as the plan expired
in March 2007.
The following weighted average assumptions are included in the
estimated grant date fair value calculations for rights to
purchase stock under the Purchase Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 months
|
|
6 months
|
Risk-free interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.90%
|
|
2.56%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
|
|
|
49%
|
|
76%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
The weighted-average fair value of purchase rights granted under
the Purchase Plan in 2006 and 2005 was $1.36 and $1.08 per
share, respectively.
Prior to 2006, the Company accounted for its employee stock
option and employee stock purchase plans under the intrinsic
value recognition and measurement principles of APB No. 25
and related Interpretations, and had adopted the disclosure-only
provisions of SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Transition and Disclosures. As the exercise price of the
Companys employee stock options equals the market price of
the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation
expense was recognized in the Companys financial
statements.
In calculating pro forma compensation, the fair value of each
option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton options pricing model. The
Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model was developed for use
in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no
vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
the Black-Scholes-Merton model requires the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price
volatility. As the Companys stock-based awards to
employees have characteristics significantly different from
those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate,
in managements opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of its stock-based
awards to its employees.
Had the Company determined stock-based compensation costs based
on the estimated fair value at the grant date for its stock
options and the estimated fair value at the issuance date for
its ESPP, the Companys net loss and net loss per share for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 would have been as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
Net loss as reported
|
|
$
|
(12,435
|
)
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net
loss, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Stock-based compensation expense determined under fair
value method for all awards
|
|
|
(1,363
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(13,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share, as reported basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.80
|
)
|
Pro forma loss per share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
F-15
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
On May 22, 2006, the Company completed the sale of
substantially all the assets and some of the liabilities
associated with its DTV solutions business to Kudelski for a
total consideration of $10.6 million in cash, of which
$9 million was paid at the time of sale and
$1.6 million, which was originally payable subject to the
completion of certain product development milestones by Kudelski
subsequent to the close of the transaction, was paid in
May 2007.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets, for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the DTV
solutions business has been presented as discontinued operations
in the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows and
all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to this
presentation.
Based on the carrying value of the assets and the liabilities
attributed to the DTV solutions business on May 22, 2006,
and the estimated costs and expenses incurred in connection with
the sale, the Company recorded a net pretax gain of
approximately $5.5 million. An additional $1.5 million
gain on sale of discontinued operations was realized in May 2007
primarily resulting from the final payment by Kudelski as
described above.
Based on a Transition Services and Side Agreement
between the Company and Kudelski, revenues relating to the
discontinued operations of the DTV solutions business were
generated for a limited time after the sale of the DTV solutions
business. Under this agreement, a service fee was earned by the
Company for its services related to ordering products from a
supplier and selling these products to Kudelski. The agreement
was terminated at the end of the first quarter of 2007 and
related revenues ceased after this period.
The operating results for the discontinued operations of the DTV
solutions business for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
|
$
|
13,513
|
|
|
$
|
20,785
|
|
Operating gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,868
|
)
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
2,953
|
|
|
$
|
(1,791
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
3,020
|
|
|
$
|
(1,608
|
)
|
During 2003, the Company completed two transactions to sell its
retail Digital Media and Video business. On July 25, 2003,
the Company completed the sale of its digital video business to
Pinnacle Systems and on August 1, 2003, the Company
completed the sale of its retail digital media reader business
to Zio Corporation. As a result of these sales, the Company has
accounted for the retail Digital Media and Video business as
discontinued operations.
The operating results for the discontinued operations of the
retail Digital Media and Video business for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(304
|
)
|
|
$
|
(168
|
)
|
|
$
|
(287
|
)
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(207
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(430
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
(71
|
)
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(299
|
)
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
(501
|
)
|
F-16
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The operating loss for the Digital Media and Video business
resulted from general and administrative expenses for the
discontinued entities in the U.S. and UK, mainly in
connection with the remaining long-term lease agreements from
the discontinued operations.
During 2007, net gain on disposal of the retail Digital Media
and Video business was $0.1 million, which was related to
changes in estimates for lease commitments.
During 2006, net loss on disposal of the retail Digital Media
and Video business was $0.1 million, which was related to
changes in estimates for lease commitments.
During 2005, net loss on disposal of the retail Digital Media
and Video business was $2.2 million, of which the majority
was related to the settlement of litigation with DVD Cre8, Inc.
and related legal costs (see Note 8).
|
|
4.
|
Short-Term
Investments
|
At December 31, 2007, the entire short-term investment
portfolio matures in 2008. The fair value of short-term
investments at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gain on
|
|
|
Loss on
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
$
|
13,872
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gain on
|
|
|
Loss on
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,019
|
|
U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
3,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
3,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,813
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
Adjustment to Interest Income and Other Cumulative Comprehensive
Gain
In July 2005, during a review of the Companys investment
holdings and the calculation of interest income and unrealized
gains and losses on investments, the Company discovered an error
in the recording of the amortization of investment premiums and
discounts and the related interest income and unrealized gain
(loss) on investments. As a result, interest income and
unrealized loss on investments and the balance of unrealized
loss included in other cumulative comprehensive gain for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were overstated. The
cumulative overstatement of interest income and unrealized loss
on investments for periods prior to the three months ended
June 30, 2005 was approximately $0.3 million. The
effect of the error was not material to any relevant prior
period and had the amounts been recorded correctly in the prior
periods, there would have been no effect on reported
comprehensive loss or total stockholders equity. To
correct this error, the Company recorded the cumulative
$0.3 million as a reduction in interest income and a
decrease in unrealized loss on investments during the
three-month period ended June 2005.
During each quarter, SCM evaluates investments for possible
asset impairment by examining a number of factors, including the
current economic conditions and markets for each investment, as
well as its cash position and anticipated cash needs for the
short and long term. In addition, the Company evaluates severity
and duration in each reporting period. At December 31,
2007, all of the short-term investment portfolio has an
unrealized loss. No investments have been in an unrealized loss
position for more than one year. The Company believes these fair
value declines are the result of rising short-term interest
rates for the underlying investments. For the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, no impairment of the
investments was identified based on the evaluations performed.
F-17
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventories consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
1,202
|
|
|
$
|
754
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,738
|
|
|
$
|
1,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment, net consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
Building and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,972
|
|
|
|
1,789
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Purchased software
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,898
|
|
|
|
7,977
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(7,376
|
)
|
|
|
(6,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM recorded depreciation expenses in the amount of
$0.3 million, $0.3 million and $1.0 million for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Intangible assets are associated with the Companys
European operations and consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Customer relations
|
|
|
60 months
|
|
|
$
|
1,834
|
|
|
$
|
(1,834
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,639
|
|
|
$
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
Core technology
|
|
|
60 months
|
|
|
|
2,078
|
|
|
|
(2,078
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
(1,705
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,912
|
|
|
$
|
(3,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(3,225
|
)
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, SCMs intangible assets relating to
core technology and customer relations are subject to
amortization.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets for continuing
operations was $0.3 million, $0.7 million and
$0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
No further amounts remain to be amortized in future periods.
F-18
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges
|
Continuing
Operations
During 2007, the Company realized income from the release of a
severance accrual related to continuing operations of $4,000.
During 2006 and 2005, SCM incurred net restructuring and other
charges related to continuing operations of approximately
$1.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
Accrued liabilities related to restructuring actions and other
activities during 2007, 2006 and 2005 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease/Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments and other changes in 2005
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(867
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for 2006
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments and other changes in 2006
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(1,370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments and other changes in 2007
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, the Company did not incur expenses for
restructuring, as past restructuring activities had been
completed in earlier periods.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, restructuring
and other charges primarily related to severance costs in
connection with a reduction in force resulting from the
Companys decision to transfer all manufacturing operations
from its Singapore facility to contract manufacturers as well as
the decision to transfer the corporate headquarter functions
from California to Germany and local finance functions from the
U.S. and Singapore to Germany. Approximately
$0.3 million of the restructuring amount related to
severance for manufacturing personnel and was therefore recorded
in cost of revenue. The remaining $1.1 million was recorded
in operating expenses and was primarily made up of severance for
non-manufacturing personnel.
During 2005, SCM incurred net restructuring and other charges of
approximately $0.8 million, which was primarily related to
severance costs in connection with a reduction in force
resulting from the Companys decision to transfer all
manufacturing operations from its Singapore facility to contract
manufacturers. Approximately $0.5 million of the
restructuring amount relates to severance for manufacturing
personnel and is therefore recorded in cost of revenue. The
remaining $0.3 million is recorded in operating expenses
and is primarily made up of $0.2 million of severance for
non-manufacturing personnel and $0.1 million of changes in
estimates related to European tax matters.
F-19
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Discontinued
Operations
During 2007, income from restructuring and other items related
to discontinued operations was approximately $0.1 million.
During 2006, and 2005, SCM incurred restructuring and other
charges related to discontinued operations of approximately
$0.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively.
Accrued liabilities related to restructuring actions and other
activities during 2007, 2006 and 2005 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
|
|
|
Lease/Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balances as of January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,960
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
5,415
|
|
|
$
|
9,652
|
|
Provision for 2005
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
Payments and other changes in 2005
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(5,574
|
)
|
|
|
(8,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
Provision for 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Payments and other changes in 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
Provision for 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Payments and other changes in 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,589
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
2,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007 primarily related to changes in estimates
for lease obligations.
Discontinued operation costs for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 primarily related to changes in estimates
for lease obligations.
Exit costs for the year ended December 31, 2005 primarily
related to the settlement of litigation with DVD Cre8, Inc. and
legal costs, as well as changes in estimates for lease
obligations.
As shown in the table above in Payments and other changes
in 2005 Other Costs, in April 2005, SCM made a
payment to the French government of approximately
$4.7 million as then calculated, related to Value Added Tax
(VAT) in respect of sales transactions with a former
customer. In connection with this payment, SCM entered into an
agreement with the customer whereby the customer agreed to seek
a refund from the French government for the VAT paid with
respect to the products it purchased from the Company, and then
remit the refunded amount to SCM. On June 9, 2006, the
customer remitted to the Company the full amount, which after
conversion into U.S. Dollars amounted to $5.0 million,
of which $4.2 million was recognized as other income from
discontinued operations. The difference between the
$5.0 million remittance and the $4.2 million other
income were receivables which were realizable independently from
the outcome of the aforementioned agreement.
F-20
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Loss before income taxes for domestic and
non-U.S. continuing
operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
|
$
|
(2,709
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,017
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(4,292
|
)
|
|
|
(4,908
|
)
|
|
|
(32,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(3,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,617
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,005
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The benefit (provision) for income taxes consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
|
$
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant items making up deferred tax assets and liabilities
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowances not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
|
$
|
1,370
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
39,924
|
|
|
|
44,814
|
|
Accrued and other
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,206
|
|
|
|
47,470
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(41,206
|
)
|
|
|
(47,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Deferred tax liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, SCM
recognized a benefit of $0.5 million and $0.8 million,
respectively, from the utilization of net operating loss
carryforwards for which the Company had
F-21
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
previously established a full valuation allowance. Because of
the full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets,
the benefit from the utilization of this tax attribute had not
been previously recognized.
The provision for taxes reconciles to the amount computed by
applying the statutory federal rate to loss before income taxes
from continuing operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Computed expected tax benefit
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign taxes benefits provided for at rates other than U.S.
statutory rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
(44
|
)%
|
|
|
(41
|
)%
|
Permanent Differences
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(0
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, SCM has net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $72.2 million for federal,
$31.4 million for state and $54.9 million for foreign
income tax purposes. If not utilized, these carryforwards will
begin to expire beginning in 2012 for federal purposes and have
already begun to expire for state and foreign purposes.
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 limits the use of net operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards in certain situations where changes
occur in the stock ownership of a company. In the event SCM has
a change in ownership, utilization of the carryforwards could be
restricted.
SCM has no present intention of remitting undistributed earnings
of foreign subsidiaries, and accordingly, no deferred tax
liability has been established relative to these undistributed
earnings.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, SCM adopted the
provisions of, and accounted for uncertain tax positions in
accordance with FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. It
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.
Differences between the amounts recognized in the statements of
financial position prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the
amounts reported after adoption are to be accounted for as an
adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings.
As a result of the implementation, SCM recognized a
$1.5 million decrease to income taxes payable for uncertain
tax positions. This decrease was accounted for as an adjustment
to the beginning balance of accumulated deficit on the balance
sheet.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits with an impact on the Companys
consolidated balance sheets or results of operations for 2007 is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
15
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
While timing of the resolution
and/or
finalization of tax audits is uncertain, the Company does not
believe that its unrecognized tax benefits as disclosed in the
above table would materially change in the next 12 months.
As a result of adoption of FIN 48, unrecognized tax
benefits were reclassified to long-term income taxes payable,
where applicable.
In addition, as of December 31, 2007, the Company
determined $4.1 million in liability for unrecognized tax
benefits, which was accounted for as a decrease to deferred tax
assets which had a full valuation allowance against them and has
no impact on the Companys consolidated balance sheets or
results of operations for 2007.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of
December 31, 2007, approximately $43,000 of accrued
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
SCM files U.S. federal, U.S. state and foreign tax
returns. The Company is generally no longer subject to tax
examinations for years prior to 1999. When loss carryforwards of
tax years prior to 1999 would be utilized in the U.S., these tax
years also might become subject to investigation by the tax
authorities.
|
|
10.
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Common Share
|
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators used in computing basic and diluted net income
(loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(3,292
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,690
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,155
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
(4,280
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,042
|
|
|
$
|
(12,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (denominator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in computation
of basic and diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
|
15,725
|
|
|
|
15,638
|
|
|
|
15,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share Basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As SCM has incurred losses from continuing operations during
each of the last three fiscal years, shares issuable under stock
options are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings
per share as their effect is anti-dilutive. Common equivalent
shares issuable under stock options and their weighted average
exercise price for the three years ended December 31, 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Common equivalent shares issuable
|
|
|
30,554
|
|
|
|
24,094
|
|
|
|
48,533
|
|
Weighted average exercise price of shares issuable
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.84
|
|
F-23
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Segment
Reporting, Geographic Information and Major Customers
|
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards
for the reporting by public business enterprises of information
about operating segments, products and services, geographic
areas, and major customers. The method for determining what
information to report is based on the way that management
organizes the operating segments within the Company for making
operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The
Companys chief operating decision maker is considered to
be its executive staff, consisting of the Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
Strategic Sales and Business Development and Executive Vice
President, Strategy, Marketing and Engineering.
The Companys continuing operations provide secure digital
access solutions to OEM customers in two markets segments:
Secure Authentication and Digital Media and Connectivity. The
executive staff reviews financial information and business
performance along these two business segments. The Company
evaluates the performance of its segments at the revenue and
gross margin level. The Companys reporting systems do not
track or allocate operating expenses or assets by segment. The
Company does not include intercompany transfers between segments
for management purposes.
On May 22, 2006, the Company completed the sale of
substantially all the assets and some of the liabilities
associated with its DTV solutions business to Kudelski. In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets, for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, this business
has been presented as discontinued operations in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows and all
prior periods have been reclassified to conform to this
presentation.
Summary information by segment for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Secure Authentication:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
24,427
|
|
|
$
|
23,745
|
|
|
$
|
17,415
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
10,472
|
|
|
|
9,725
|
|
|
|
6,120
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Digital Media and Connectivity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
6,008
|
|
|
$
|
9,868
|
|
|
$
|
10,521
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
4,710
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
30,435
|
|
|
$
|
33,613
|
|
|
$
|
27,936
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
11,857
|
|
|
|
10,830
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
F-24
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Geographic revenue is based on selling location. Information
regarding revenue by geographic region is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
15,744
|
|
|
$
|
14,695
|
|
|
$
|
11,623
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
8,722
|
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
9,749
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
5,969
|
|
|
|
5,624
|
|
|
|
6,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
30,435
|
|
|
$
|
33,613
|
|
|
$
|
27,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
One customer exceeded 10% of total revenue for each of 2007 and
2006 and two customers exceeded 10% of total revenue for 2005.
Two U.S. based customers represented 30% and 15%,
respectively of the Companys accounts receivable balance
at December 31, 2007. One Asia-based customer and one
U.S.-based
customer represented 19% and 17%, respectively, of the
Companys accounts receivable balance at December 31,
2006.
Long-lived assets by geographic location as of December 2007 and
2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the long-lived assets as of December 31, 2007, and
$1,264,000 of the long-lived assets as of December 31,
2006, disclosed for Asia-Pacific, relate to SCMs
facilities in India.
The Company leases its facilities, certain equipment, and
automobiles under noncancelable operating lease agreements.
These lease agreements expire at various dates during the next
nine years for agreements existing as of December 31, 2007.
F-25
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating
leases as of December 31, 2007 are as follows for the years
ending:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
1,870
|
|
2009
|
|
|
954
|
|
2010
|
|
|
866
|
|
2011
|
|
|
386
|
|
2012
|
|
|
247
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committed gross lease payments
|
|
|
5,187
|
|
Less: sublease rental income
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating lease obligation
|
|
$
|
4,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, the Company has accrued approximately
$2.6 million of restructuring charges in connection with a
portion of the above lease commitments. Rent expense from
continuing operations was $1.2 million, $1.5 million
and $1.8 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Purchases for inventories are highly dependent upon forecasts of
the customers demand. Due to the uncertainty in demand
from its customers, the Company may have to change, reschedule,
or cancel purchases or purchase orders from its suppliers. These
changes may lead to vendor cancellation charges on these
purchases or contractual commitments. As of December 31,
2007, purchase and contractual commitments were approximately
$3.8 million.
SCM provides warranties on certain product sales, which range
from twelve to twenty-four months, and allowances for estimated
warranty costs are recorded during the period of sale. The
determination of such allowances requires the Company to make
estimates of product return rates and expected costs to repair
or to replace the products under warranty. SCM currently
establishes warranty reserves based on historical warranty costs
for each product line combined with liability estimates based on
the prior twelve months sales activities. If actual return
rates and/or
repair and replacement costs differ significantly from
SCMs estimates, adjustments to recognize additional cost
of sales may be required in future periods.
Components of the reserve for warranty costs during the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions related to current period sales
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty costs incurred in the current period
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to accruals related to prior period sales
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions related to current period sales
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty costs incurred in the current period
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to accruals related to prior period sales
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions related to current period sales
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty costs incurred in the current period
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to accruals related to prior period sales
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Related-Party
Transactions
|
Werner Koepf, SCMs Chairman of the Board, also served
until June 2007 as a director and as a member of the Audit
Committee and the Compensation Committee of Gemplus
International S.A., a company engaged in the development and
distribution of smart-card based systems. During 2007, SCM
incurred license expenses of approximately $0.1 million to
Gemplus. Approximately $80,000 of this amount related to
continuing operations. License expenses of approximately
$0.2 million and $0.4 million were incurred for 2006
and 2005, respectively, of which approximately $76,000 and
$232,000 related to continuing operations. As of
December 31, 2007 and as of December 31, 2005, no
accounts payable were due to Gemplus. As of December 31,
2006, approximately $30,000 was due as accounts payable to
Gemplus. During 2007, SCM realized revenue of approximately
$0.2 million from sales to Gemplus. Revenues of
approximately $11,000 and $0 were realized for 2006 and 2005,
respectively. As of December 31, 2007 and as of
December 31, 2005, no accounts receivable were outstanding
from Gemplus. As of December 31, 2006, approximately
$11,000 was due as accounts receivable from Gemplus. SCMs
business relationship with Gemplus has been in existence for
many years and predates Werner Koepfs appointment to the
Companys Board of Directors in February 2006.
Mr. Koepf was not directly compensated for revenue
transactions between the two companies. The related-party
transactions have been performed following at arms
length principles.
From time to time, SCM could be subject to claims arising in the
ordinary course of business or be a defendant in lawsuits. While
the outcome of such claims or other proceedings cannot be
predicted with certainty, SCMs management expects that any
such liabilities, to the extent not provided for by insurance or
otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
F-27
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Quarterly
Results of Operations (Unaudited)
|
The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of
operations for 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data; unaudited)
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
8,457
|
|
|
$
|
4,647
|
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
$
|
9,714
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
3,740
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(4,053
|
)
|
|
|
(363
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(3,673
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
363
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(2,245
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
367
|
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from discontinued
operations
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Shares used to compute basic income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
15,700
|
|
|
|
15,730
|
|
|
|
15,736
|
|
|
|
15,736
|
|
Shares used to compute diluted income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
15,742
|
|
|
|
15,730
|
|
|
|
15,736
|
|
|
|
15,759
|
|
F-28
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data; unaudited)
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
7,427
|
|
|
$
|
9,362
|
|
|
$
|
7,396
|
|
|
$
|
9,428
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
3,159
|
|
|
|
2,125
|
|
|
|
3,923
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2,824
|
)
|
|
|
(2,281
|
)
|
|
|
(4,030
|
)
|
|
|
393
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,701
|
)
|
|
|
(1,991
|
)
|
|
|
(3,680
|
)
|
|
|
682
|
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(942
|
)
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
715
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
5,242
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,622
|
)
|
|
|
7,199
|
|
|
|
(3,869
|
)
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from discontinued
operations
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Shares used to compute basic income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
15,593
|
|
|
|
15,627
|
|
|
|
15,648
|
|
|
|
15,683
|
|
Shares used to compute diluted income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
15,593
|
|
|
|
15,627
|
|
|
|
15,648
|
|
|
|
15,714
|
|
F-29
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
25,020
|
|
|
$
|
18,600
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,844
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $495 and $341 as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
|
|
|
6,368
|
|
|
|
8,638
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
37,019
|
|
|
|
45,275
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,947
|
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
40,600
|
|
|
$
|
48,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,484
|
|
|
$
|
3,063
|
|
Accrued compensation and related benefits
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
Accrued restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
Accrued royalties
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
2,325
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
9,247
|
|
|
|
11,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Long-term income taxes payable
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 10 and 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 40,000 shares
authorized; 16,362 and 16,356 shares issued and 15,744 and
15,737 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
229,675
|
|
|
|
229,414
|
|
Treasury stock, 618 shares
|
|
|
(2,777
|
)
|
|
|
(2,777
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(198,077
|
)
|
|
|
(192,089
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
31,137
|
|
|
|
37,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
40,600
|
|
|
$
|
48,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-30
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data; unaudited)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
6,393
|
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
$
|
19,377
|
|
|
$
|
20,721
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
10,961
|
|
|
|
12,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
8,416
|
|
|
|
8,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
3,058
|
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
7,010
|
|
|
|
4,802
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
4,957
|
|
|
|
3,810
|
|
|
|
14,786
|
|
|
|
13,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(2,047
|
)
|
|
|
(363
|
)
|
|
|
(6,370
|
)
|
|
|
(4,530
|
)
|
Interest and other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,164
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(6,663
|
)
|
|
|
(3,531
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(3,267
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(6,814
|
)
|
|
|
(3,655
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,799
|
)
|
|
$
|
(183
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) per share from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
|
|
15,736
|
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
15,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive gain (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,799
|
)
|
|
$
|
(183
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,288
|
)
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,823
|
)
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
(6,163
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-31
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,288
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(826
|
)
|
|
|
(1,367
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,704
|
)
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
(2,143
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
(1,619
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(6,555
|
)
|
|
|
(5,293
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(6,905
|
)
|
|
|
(4,596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
Maturities of short-term investments
|
|
|
13,873
|
|
|
|
12,656
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,793
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
13,339
|
|
|
|
(4,315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of equity securities, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,420
|
|
|
|
(7,960
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
18,600
|
|
|
|
32,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
25,020
|
|
|
$
|
24,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax refunds received
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-32
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SEPTEMBER
30, 2008
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information
and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered
necessary for a fair presentation of SCM Microsystems,
Inc.s (SCM or the Company)
financial position, results of operations and cash flows have
been included. Operating results for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2008 or any future period. For further
information, refer to the financial statements and notes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The preparation of
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
necessarily requires the Company to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the condensed consolidated balance sheet dates and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods
presented.
Discontinued
Operations
On May 22, 2006, the Company completed the sale of
substantially all the assets and some of the liabilities
associated with its Digital Television solutions (DTV
solutions) business to Kudelski S.A.
(Kudelski) for a total consideration of
$10.6 million in cash, of which $9.0 million was paid
at the time of sale and $1.6 million was paid in May 2007.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets, for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, this
business has been presented as discontinued operations in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows
and all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to this
presentation. See Note 3 for further discussion of this
transaction.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)). Under
SFAS No. 141(R), an entity is required to recognize
the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual
contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value
on the acquisition date. It further requires that
acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the
acquisition and expensed as incurred, restructuring costs
generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition
date, and changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the
measurement period be included in income tax expense. In
addition, acquired in-process research and development is
capitalized as an intangible asset and amortized over its
estimated useful life. The adoption of SFAS No. 141(R)
will change the Companys accounting treatment for business
combinations on a prospective basis beginning in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB
No. 51. SFAS No. 160 changes the accounting
and reporting for minority interests, which will be
recharacterized as non-controlling interests and classified as a
component of equity. SFAS No. 160 is effective for SCM
on a prospective basis for business combinations with an
acquisition date beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year
2009. As of September 30, 2008, SCM did not have any
minority interests.
F-33
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.
SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure
certain financial instruments and other items at fair value
using an
instrument-by-instrument
election. The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses
are reported in earnings for items measured using the fair value
option. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have an
impact on SCMs consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
On January 1, 2008, SCM adopted SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, for all financial assets and
financial liabilities and for all non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value
in the financial statements on a recurring basis (i.e., at least
annually). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances
fair value measurement disclosure. SFAS No. 157 does
not change the accounting for those instruments that were, under
previous GAAP, accounted for at cost or contract value. The
adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a significant
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements,
and the resulting fair values calculated under
SFAS No. 157 after adoption were not significantly
different than the fair values that would have been calculated
under previous guidance.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable objective
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs, which
require additional reliance on the Companys judgment, when
measuring fair value. A financial instruments
categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. SFAS No. 157 establishes three levels of
inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices for identical
instruments in active markets;
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar
instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active and
model-derived valuations, in which all significant inputs are
observable in active markets; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations derived from
valuation techniques, in which one or more significant inputs
are unobservable.
|
The Company uses the following classifications to measure
different financial instruments at fair value, including an
indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy in which
each instrument is generally classified:
Cash equivalents include highly liquid debt investments
(money market fund deposits, commercial paper and treasury
bills) with maturities of three months or less at the date of
acquisition. These financial instruments are classified in
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Short-term investments consist of corporate notes and
United States government agency instruments and are classified
as available-for-sale. These financial instruments are
classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. As of
September 30, 2008, the Company has no short-term
investments.
Assets that are measured and recognized at fair value on a
recurring basis classified under the appropriate level of the
fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
Money market fund deposits
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
Treasury Bills
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Commercial papers
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
17,447
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, there are no liabilities that are
measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis.
F-34
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
157-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement
No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements that Address
Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13, and
FSP 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157.
FSP 157-1
amends SFAS No. 157 to remove certain leasing
transactions from its scope.
FSP 157-2
delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (i.e., at least
annually), until the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that
SFAS No. 157 will have on its consolidated financial
statements when it is applied to non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities that are not measured at fair value on
a recurring basis beginning in the first quarter of 2009.
|
|
2.
|
Stock
Based Compensation
|
The Company has a stock-based compensation program that provides
its Board of Directors discretion in creating employee equity
incentives. This program includes incentive and non-statutory
stock options under various plans, the majority of which are
stockholder approved. Stock options are generally time-based and
expire seven to ten years from the date of grant. Vesting
varies, with some options vesting 25% each year over four years;
some vesting
1/12th per
month over one year; some vesting 100% after one year; and some
vesting
1/12th per
month, commencing four years from the date of grant.
The Company previously had an Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP) that allowed employees to purchase shares of
common stock at 85% of the fair market value at the lower of
either the date of enrollment or the date of purchase. Shares
issued as a result of stock option exercises and purchases under
the Companys ESPP were newly issued shares. The
Companys ESPP, Director Option Plan and 1997 Stock Option
Plan all expired in March 2007. In November 2007, stockholders
approved the 2007 Stock Option Plan, which authorizes the
issuance of up to 1.5 million shares of the Companys
common stock pursuant to stock option grants.
As of September 30, 2008, an aggregate of approximately
3.1 million shares of the Companys common stock was
reserved for future issuance under the Companys stock
option plans, of which 1.9 million shares were subject to
outstanding options.
In calculating stock-based compensation cost, the Company
estimates the fair value of each option grant on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton options pricing model. The
Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model was developed for use
in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no
vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
the Black-Scholes-Merton model requires the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price
volatility.
The following table illustrates the stock-based compensation
expense resulting from stock options and shares issued under the
ESPP included in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement
of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
639
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense after income taxes
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Option Plans
The Companys Director Option Plan and 1997 Stock Option
Plan expired in March 2007, and options can no longer be granted
under these plans. However, outstanding options granted under
these plans remain exercisable in accordance with the terms of
the original grant agreements.
In November 2007, stockholders approved the 2007 Stock Option
Plan, which authorizes the issuance of up to 1.5 million
shares of the Companys common stock pursuant to stock
option grants. As of September 30, 2008, a total of
1.1 million shares of the Companys common stock are
reserved for future option grants under the 2000 Stock Option
Plan and the 2007 Stock Option Plan, and 1.9 million shares
were reserved for future issuance pursuant to outstanding
options.
A summary of the activity under the Companys stock option
plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
for Grant
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,493,493
|
|
|
|
1,862,272
|
|
|
$
|
10.97
|
|
|
$
|
191,809
|
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(536,171
|
)
|
|
|
536,171
|
|
|
$
|
3.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled or expired
|
|
|
187,061
|
|
|
|
(448,023
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
|
$
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,144,383
|
|
|
|
1,944,170
|
|
|
$
|
7.69
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,772,001
|
|
|
$
|
8.12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exerciseable at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,094,584
|
|
|
$
|
11.13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
4.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value per option for
options granted during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 was $1.38 and $1.39, respectively. The
weighted-average grant date fair value per option for options
granted during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was $1.38 and $1.90, respectively. The
total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 was zero and $1,500,
respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
was zero and $8,331, respectively. Cash proceeds from the
exercise of stock options were zero and $18,000 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were zero and
$33,135 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007, respectively. An income tax benefit of less than $1,000
was realized from stock option exercises during both the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008. No income tax
benefit was realized from stock option exercises during both the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. At
September 30, 2008, there was $0.9 million of
unrecognized stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated
forfeitures related to non-vested options, that is expected to
be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
F-36
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of option grants was estimated by using the
Black-Scholes-Merton model with the following weighted-average
assumptions for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Expected Volatility: The Companys
computation of expected volatility for both the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 is based on the historical
volatility of the Companys stock for a time period
equivalent to the expected term.
Dividend Yield: The dividend yield assumption
is based on the Companys history and expectation of
dividend payouts.
Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free
interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option.
Expected Term: The Companys expected
term represents the period that the Companys stock-based
awards are expected to be outstanding and was determined for
both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008
based on historical experience of similar awards, giving
consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based
awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee
behavior.
Forfeitures Rate: Compensation expense
recognized in the consolidated statement of operations for both
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and it reflects
estimated forfeitures. FASB SFAS No. 123
revised 2004 (SFAS 123(R)) requires forfeitures
to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary,
in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. Prior to adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company
accounted for forfeitures as they occurred.
1997
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Until its expiration in March 2007, the Companys ESPP
permitted eligible employees to purchase the Companys
common stock through payroll deductions of up to 10% of their
base wages at a purchase price of 85% of the lower of fair
market value of the Companys common stock at the beginning
or end of each offering period. The Company had a two-year
rolling plan with four purchases every six months within the
offering period. If the fair market value per share was lower on
the purchase date than the beginning of the offering period, the
current offering period terminated and a new two year offering
period would have commenced. The Companys ESPP restricted
the maximum amount of shares purchased by an individual to
$25,000 worth of the Companys common stock each year. As
of September 30, 2008, no shares were available for future
issuance under the Companys ESPP, due to the plans
expiration in March 2007.
Stock-based compensation expense related to the Companys
ESPP recognized under SFAS 123(R) for both the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 was zero. Stock-based
compensation expense related to the Companys ESPP
recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 was zero and a benefit of $40,000,
respectively. The benefit in the first nine months of 2007
stemmed from the expiration of the plan before the expected
offering periods had terminated. At September 30, 2008,
there was no further unrecognized stock-based compensation
expense related to outstanding ESPP shares, as the plan expired
in March 2007.
F-37
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
On May 22, 2006, the Company completed the sale of
substantially all the assets and some of the liabilities
associated with its DTV solutions business to Kudelski for a
total consideration of $10.6 million in cash, of which
$9.0 million was paid at the time of sale and
$1.6 million, which was paid in May 2007.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets, for both the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the DTV
solutions business has been presented as discontinued operations
in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations and cash
flows and all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to
this presentation.
Based on the carrying value of the assets and the liabilities
attributed to the DTV solutions business on May 22, 2006,
and the estimated costs and expenses incurred in connection with
the sale, the Company recorded a net pretax gain of
approximately $5.5 million. An additional $1.5 million
gain on sale of discontinued operations was realized in May 2007
primarily resulting from the final payment by Kudelski as
described above.
Based on a Transition Services and Side Agreement
between the Company and Kudelski, revenues relating to the
discontinued operations of the DTV solutions business were
generated for a limited time after the sale of the DTV solutions
business. Under this agreement, a service fee was earned by the
Company for its services related to ordering products from a
supplier and selling these products to Kudelski. The agreement
was terminated at the end of the first quarter of 2007 and
related revenues ceased to be generated after that period.
The operating results for the discontinued operations of the DTV
solutions business for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
Operating gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Net income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
During 2003, the Company completed two transactions to sell its
retail Digital Media and Video business. On July 25, 2003,
the Company completed the sale of its digital video business to
Pinnacle Systems and on August 1, 2003, the Company
completed the sale of its retail digital media reader business
to Zio Corporation. As a result of these sales, the Company has
accounted for the retail Digital Media and Video business as
discontinued operations.
In April 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to
terminate its lease agreement for premises leased in the UK,
which resulted in the gain on sale of discontinued operations of
approximately $0.4 million in the second quarter of 2008.
F-38
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The operating results for the discontinued operations of the
retail Digital Media and Video business for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(236
|
)
|
Net gain (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
(186
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
392
|
|
|
$
|
(128
|
)
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
(242
|
)
|
The net gain from discontinued operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 mainly resulted from
foreign exchange gains in the third quarter of 2008.
|
|
4.
|
Short-Term
Investments
|
At September 30, 2008, the amount of short-term investments
was zero. The fair value of short-term investments at
December 31, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gain on
|
|
|
Loss on
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
$
|
13,872
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,844
|
|
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 during the quarter
ended March 31, 2008, see Note 1 Basis
of Presentation for further discussion and explanation.
Inventories consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
1,586
|
|
|
$
|
1,202
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,321
|
|
|
$
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
Building and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
1,972
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
|
2,904
|
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Purchased software
|
|
|
3,282
|
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,082
|
|
|
|
8,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(6,769
|
)
|
|
|
(7,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
1,313
|
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $0.1 million and $0.2 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets for continuing
operations was zero for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, and zero and $0.3 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively.
As described in Note 13 to the financial statements, the
Companys investment in TranZfinity, Inc.
(TranZfinity), follows an exclusive Cooperation
Agreement entered into on April 17, 2008 with TranZfinity
and on October 1, 2008, the Company and TranZfinity entered
into an amendment to the Cooperation Agreement. Under the terms
of the Cooperation Agreement, as amended, TranZfinity will work
with the Company to develop modular USB devices for the
Companys product portfolio and will supply the
Companys customers with TranZfinitys application
software and services supporting those devices, and the Company
will pay TranZfinity a $1.0 million exclusivity fee for the
right to be the exclusive provider of those products (the
Exclusive Products). The exclusivity fee is
comprised of $500,000 cash (of which the remaining balance to be
paid was $179,298 as of September 30, 2008), and a $4
payment from the Company to TranZfinity for each Exclusive
Product sold by the Company (up to a maximum aggregate amount of
$500,000, of which the remaining balance is the full $500,000 as
of September 30, 2008). The $320,702 already paid in
relation to the exclusivity fee has been capitalized in
September 2008 as an intangible asset, which will be subject to
amortization starting in the fourth quarter 2008.
|
|
8.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges
|
Continuing
Operations
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
the Company incurred no restructuring and other charges related
to continuing operations. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, the Company realized income from the
release of a severance accrual related to continuing operations
of $4,000.
F-40
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued liabilities related to restructuring actions and other
activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and during the year ended December 31, 2007 consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease/Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Other Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
Balances as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
Provision for 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Payments and other changes in 2007
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Provision for Q1 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments and other changes in Q1 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of March 31, 2008
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Provision for Q2 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments and other changes in Q2 2008
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Provision for Q3 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments and other changes in Q3 2008
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
Operations
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
income from restructuring and other items related to
discontinued operations was approximately $46,000 and
$0.6 million, respectively. In the second quarter 2008, a
termination payment and related transaction costs of
approximately $0.5 million were incurred and the related
restructuring accruals of approximately $0.9 million were
released related primarily to an agreement to terminate
SCMs lease agreement for the premises leased in the UK.
The transaction resulted in a net gain of approximately
$0.4 million from discontinued operations in the second
quarter 2008.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
income from restructuring and other items related to
discontinued operations was approximately $16,000 and $92,000,
respectively.
F-41
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued liabilities related to the Digital Media and Video
restructuring actions and other activities during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and during the year ended
December 31, 2007 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease/Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
Other Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
Balances as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
2,949
|
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
|
$
|
3,301
|
|
Provision for 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Payments and other changes in 2007
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,589
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
Provision for Q1 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Payments and other changes in Q1 2008
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of March 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
2,891
|
|
Provision for Q2 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
Payments and other changes in Q2 2008
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
1,856
|
|
Provision for Q3 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Payments and other changes in Q3 2008
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,363
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Segment
Reporting, Geographic Information and Major Customers
|
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards
for the reporting by public business enterprises of information
about operating segments, products and services, geographic
areas, and major customers. The method for determining what
information to report is based on the way that management
organizes the operating segments within the Company for making
operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The
Companys chief operating decision maker is considered to
be its executive staff, consisting of the Chief Executive
Officer; Chief Financial Officer; Executive Vice President,
Strategic Sales and Business Development and Executive Vice
President, Strategy, Marketing and Engineering.
The Companys continuing operations provide secure digital
access solutions primarily to original equipment manufacturers,
or OEMs, in two markets segments: Secure Authentication and
Digital Media and Connectivity. The executive staff reviews
financial information and business performance along these two
business segments. The Company evaluates the performance of its
segments at the revenue and gross margin level. The
Companys reporting systems do not track or allocate
operating expenses or assets by segment. The Company does not
include intercompany transfers between segments for management
purposes.
F-42
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summary information by segment for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
Secure Authentication:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
5,873
|
|
|
$
|
6,140
|
|
|
$
|
15,758
|
|
|
$
|
17,100
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
|
|
7,172
|
|
|
|
7,345
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Digital Media and Connectivity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
1,477
|
|
|
$
|
3,619
|
|
|
$
|
3,621
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
6,393
|
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
$
|
19,377
|
|
|
$
|
20,721
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
8,416
|
|
|
|
8,520
|
|
Gross profit %
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Geographic net revenue is based on selling location. Information
regarding net revenue by geographic region is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,655
|
|
|
$
|
3,635
|
|
|
$
|
7,214
|
|
|
$
|
9,574
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
2,603
|
|
|
|
7,151
|
|
|
|
6,716
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
5,012
|
|
|
|
4,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,393
|
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
$
|
19,377
|
|
|
$
|
20,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Long-lived assets by geographic location as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,313
|
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-43
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
All of the long-lived assets as of September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, disclosed for Asia-Pacific, relate to
the Companys facilities in India.
The Company leases its facilities, certain equipment, and
automobiles under noncancelable operating lease agreements.
Those lease agreements existing as of September 30, 2008,
expire at various dates during the next five years.
Purchases for inventories are highly dependent upon forecasts of
customer demand. Due to the uncertainty in demand from its
customers, the Company may have to change, reschedule, or cancel
purchases or purchase orders from its suppliers. These changes
may lead to vendor cancellation charges on these purchases or
contractual commitments. The Company enters into a number of
agreements for the sourcing of supplies and materials including
some arrangements with minimum purchase commitments. As of
September 30, 2008, total purchase and contractual
commitments due within one year were approximately
$10.1 million, and additional purchase and contractual
commitments due within two years were approximately
$2.6 million.
The Company provides warranties on certain product sales, which
range from twelve to twenty-four months, and allowances for
estimated warranty costs are recorded during the period of sale.
The determination of such allowances requires the Company to
make estimates of product return rates and expected costs to
repair or to replace the products under warranty. The Company
currently establishes warranty reserves based on historical
warranty costs for each product line combined with liability
estimates based on the prior twelve months sales
activities. If actual return rates
and/or
repair and replacement costs differ significantly from the
Companys estimates, adjustments to recognize additional
cost of sales may be required in future periods.
Components of the reserve for warranty costs for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited)
|
|
|
Balances at January 1
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
Additions related to sales during the period
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Warranty costs incurred during the period
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Adjustments to accruals related to prior period sales
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at September 30
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Net
Income (Loss) per Common Share
|
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted net income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts; unaudited)
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(3,267
|
)
|
|
$
|
(116
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,655
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,799
|
)
|
|
$
|
(183
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in income (loss) per common share basic
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
|
|
15,736
|
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
15,722
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The computation of diluted net loss per common share for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 excludes the
effect of the potential exercise of options to purchase
approximately zero and 3,000 shares, respectively, because
the effect would be anti-dilutive in periods when there is a net
loss. The computation of diluted net loss per common share for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 also
excludes the effect of the potential exercise of options to
purchase approximately 2.0 million and 1.9 million
shares, respectively, because the option exercise price was
greater than the average market price of the common shares and
the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
The computation of diluted net income (loss) per common share
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
excludes the effect of the potential exercise of options to
purchase approximately 7,000 and 33,000 shares,
respectively, because the effect would be anti-dilutive in
periods when there is a net loss. The computation of diluted net
income (loss) per common share for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 also excludes the effect of the
potential exercise of options to purchase approximately
1.7 million and 1.7 million shares, respectively,
because the option exercise price was greater than the average
market price of the common shares and the effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
From time to time, the Company could be subject to claims
arising in the ordinary course of business or be a defendant in
lawsuits. While the outcome of such claims or other proceedings
cannot be predicted with certainty, the Companys
management expects that any such liabilities, to the extent not
provided for by insurance or otherwise, will not have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
Investment
in TranZfinity
On October 1, 2008, the Company entered into a Stock
Purchase Agreement with TranZfinity, pursuant to which the
Company purchased 10 million shares of TranZfinity common
stock, or 33.7% of TranZfinitys outstanding shares (16.67%
on a fully diluted basis), for an aggregate purchase price of
$2.5 million. The transaction closed on October 2,
2008. The Company also entered into a Stockholders Agreement
with TranZfinity and certain other stockholders of TranZfinity,
which sets forth certain rights and privileges of the Company
and the other stockholders of TranZfinity, including rights and
privileges with respect to the composition of TranZfinitys
Board of Directors.
The Companys investment in TranZfinity follows an
exclusive Cooperation Agreement entered into on April 17,
2008 with TranZfinity. On October 1, 2008, the Company and
TranZfinity entered into an amendment to the Cooperation
Agreement pursuant to which TranZfinity consented to the
assignment by SCM Microsystems GmbH and the assumption by SCM
Microsystems, Inc. of all of SCM Microsystems GmbHs rights
and obligations under the Cooperation Agreement. Under the terms
of the Cooperation Agreement, as amended, TranZfinity will work
with the Company to develop modular USB devices for the
Companys product portfolio and will supply the
Companys customers with TranZfinitys application
software and services supporting those devices, and the Company
will pay TranZfinity a $1.0 million exclusivity fee for the
right to be the exclusive provider of those products (the
Exclusive Products). The exclusivity fee is
comprised of $500,000 cash (of which the remaining balance to be
paid was $179,298 as of September 30, 2008), and a $4
payment from the Company to TranZfinity for each Exclusive
Product sold by the Company (up to a maximum aggregate amount of
$500,000, of which the remaining balance is the full $500,000 as
of September 30, 2008). In addition to the exclusivity fee,
the Company will pay TranZfinity a five percent (5%) royalty on
the Companys net selling price for each Exclusive Product
sold by the Company.
Sale
of Patents
On October 30, 2008, the Company sold at auction certain
non-core patents that are unrelated to the Companys
current business. The Company will receive net proceeds of
$1.4 million from the sale of these patents.
F-45
INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hirsch
Electronics Corporation (the Company) as of
November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Hirsch Electronics Corporation as of November 30, 2008,
2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Newport Beach, California
January 26, 2009
F-47
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
BALANCE
SHEETS
November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,932
|
|
|
$
|
5,014
|
|
|
$
|
4,031
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
3,996
|
|
|
|
2,844
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Note receivable
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
11,488
|
|
|
|
10,980
|
|
|
|
8,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
Patents, net
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
12,065
|
|
|
$
|
11,758
|
|
|
$
|
9,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,009
|
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
Royalties payable to related parties
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Put option derivative liability
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; 5,000 shares authorized; 4,606,
4,582, and 4,578 shares issued and outstanding at
November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
4,566
|
|
|
|
4,302
|
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
Notes receivable for common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
4,791
|
|
|
|
5,829
|
|
|
|
4,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
9,357
|
|
|
|
10,066
|
|
|
|
8,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
12,065
|
|
|
$
|
11,758
|
|
|
$
|
9,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-48
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
23,042
|
|
|
$
|
21,990
|
|
|
$
|
20,883
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
9,370
|
|
|
|
8,747
|
|
Royalties to related parties
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12,026
|
|
|
|
11,627
|
|
|
|
11,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
9,576
|
|
|
|
8,055
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,310
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,986
|
|
|
|
8,994
|
|
|
|
8,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
(960
|
)
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
Other (loss) income
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before provisions for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,702
|
)
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
Provision for income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,038
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-49
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Years
Ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
for Common
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, December 1, 2005
|
|
|
4,574
|
|
|
$
|
4,187
|
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,166
|
|
|
$
|
6,240
|
|
Collection on notes receivable for common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,963
|
|
|
|
1,963
|
|
Balance, November 30, 2006
|
|
|
4,578
|
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
4,129
|
|
|
|
8,240
|
|
Collection on notes receivable for common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 30, 2007
|
|
|
4,582
|
|
|
|
4,302
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
5,829
|
|
|
|
10,066
|
|
Collection on notes receivable for common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,038
|
)
|
|
|
(1,038
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 30, 2008
|
|
|
4,606
|
|
|
$
|
4,566
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,791
|
|
|
$
|
9,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-50
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Years
Ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,038
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,963
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Change in put option derivative liability
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Impairment on investments
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) loss on equity method investment
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
299
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
Royalties payable to related parties
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Acquisition of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
Note receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Patent costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collection of notes receivable for common stock
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
5,014
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of year
|
|
$
|
4,932
|
|
|
$
|
5,014
|
|
|
$
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
|
$
|
705
|
|
|
$
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-51
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
November 30,
2008, 2007 and 2006
Hirsch Electronics Corporation (the Company) was
incorporated in 1981 and is engaged in the design, manufacture
and distribution of security management systems. The Company
sells primarily to dealers located in North America.
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below
is designed to assist in understanding the Companys
financial statements. Such financial statements and accompanying
notes are the representations of the Companys management,
who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These
accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) in
all material respects, and have been consistently applied in
preparing the accompanying financial statements.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates
made by management, among others, relate to the realizable value
of inventories, the realization of long-lived assets, the
allowance for doubtful accounts, the valuation of investments,
the valuation of call and put options related to Hirsch EMEA,
assumptions used in measuring stock-based compensation, and the
valuation of deferred tax assets. While actual results could
differ from those estimates, management believes that the
estimates are reasonable.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
The Companys financial instruments that potentially expose
the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash
and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash with high
credit quality institutions, with the majority of its cash in
treasury money market funds.
From time to time, the Company maintains cash balances at
certain institutions in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) limit of $250,000 ($100,000 in
2007 and 2006). Such excess totaled approximately
$0.2 million , $0.3 million and $0.2 million at
November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The Companys sales are concentrated in a relatively few
number of customers and, as a result, the Company maintains
individually significant receivable balances with these parties.
The Company performs periodic evaluations of its customers
financial condition, but generally does not require collateral
to support credit sales. The Company maintains reserves for
estimated potential credit losses. Accounts receivable from one
customer represented approximately 12%, and 22% of total
accounts receivable at November 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Accounts receivable from two customers represented
25% of total accounts receivable at November 30, 2006.
Sales from one customer represented approximately 12% and 15%
for the years ended November 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. There was no significant concentration of sales
for the year ended November 30, 2008.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all liquid short-term investments, with
maturity dates of three months or less when purchased, to be
cash equivalents. The Companys cash equivalents consist
primarily of amounts held in treasury money market funds, with a
maturity of less than three months at the date of purchase.
Amounts held primarily in treasury money market funds totaled
approximately $4.7 million, $4.9 million and
$3.6 million at November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
F-52
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate
their fair values because of the short-term maturity of these
items.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The Company performs periodic reviews of collectability and
provides an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable as
management deems necessary. Management considers historical
customer experience and industry trends in establishing and
maintaining such reserve. Management considers the allowance for
doubtful accounts at November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006 of
approximately $9,000, $9,000 and $15,000, respectively, to be
adequate to provide for losses which could be sustained in the
realization of these accounts. Although the Company expects to
collect net amounts due, actual collections may differ from
these estimated amounts.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out) or market, and consist primarily of raw materials,
work-in-process
and finished goods. Market is determined by comparison with
recent sales or net realizable value. Such net realizable value
is based on managements forecasts for sales of the
Companys products in the ensuing years. The Company
operates in an industry characterized by technological change.
Should the demand for the Companys products prove to be
significantly less than anticipated, the ultimate realizable
value of the Companys inventory could be substantially
less than amounts in the accompanying balance sheets. The
Company periodically reviews the age and turnover of its
inventory to determine whether any inventory has become obsolete
or has declined in value and records a charge to cost of
revenues for known and estimated inventory obsolescence. There
was no inventory reserve at November 30, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively
Investments
The Companys investments consist of cost and equity method
investments in other entities. The equity method of accounting
is used when the Company has the ability to exercise significant
influence in the operating and financial activities of an
investee. Significant influence is generally achieved by owning
at least 20% of the voting interest of the investee without the
ability to exercise control. Under the equity method, original
investments are recorded at cost and adjusted by the
Companys share of undistributed earnings or losses of
these entities. Nonmarketable investments in which the Company
has less than a 20% interest and in which it does not have the
ability to exercise significant influence over the investee are
initially carried at cost, as management believes it is not
practicable to estimate fair value of this investment. An
impairment charge is recognized on both equity method and cost
method investments when factors indicate that a decrease in
value of the investment has occurred which is other than
temporary.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets
ranging from five to seven years. Leasehold improvements are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the
estimated useful lives of the assets or the related lease terms.
Significant renewals and betterments are capitalized.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Patents
Patents represent external legal costs incurred for filing
patent applications and their maintenance, and purchased
patents. Amortization for patents is recorded using the
straight-line method over the lesser of the life of the patent
or its estimated useful life, which ranges from two to seventeen
years. Accumulated amortization for
F-53
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
patents was $1.5 million, $1.5 million and
$1.5 million as of November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Amortization expense for patents for the years
ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $6,960, $6,790
and $5,886, respectively. As of November 30, 2008, the
estimated total amortization expense for the next five years is
approximately $6,000 per year. The weighted average remaining
life of the patents is approximately six years.
Long-Lived
Assets
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of,
addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment
or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144
requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their
carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If the cost basis of a
long-lived asset is greater than the projected future
undiscounted net cash flows from such asset, an impairment
charge is recognized. Impairment charges are calculated as the
difference between the cost basis of an asset and its estimated
fair value.
Management believes that no indicators of impairment existed as
of and for the year ended November 30, 2008. There can be
no assurance, however, that market conditions or demand for the
Companys products or services will not change which could
result in long-lived asset impairment charges in the future.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company derives revenue from sales of products and services.
Consistently, over 90% of revenue is from sales of hardware. The
following summarizes the major terms of the contractual
relationships with customers and the manner in which the Company
accounts for sales transactions.
Hardware
Revenue
Hardware revenue consists of the sale of access control hardware
including the ScramblePad products, controllers, network and
communication products and other security related hardware. The
Company recognizes revenue pursuant to
EITF 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
(EITF 00-21)
and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB 104). In
accordance with these revenue recognition guidelines, revenue is
recognized for a unit of accounting when all of the following
criteria are met:
|
|
|
|
|
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
|
|
|
|
delivery has occurred;
|
|
|
|
fee is fixed or determinable; and
|
|
|
|
collectability is reasonably assured.
|
Generally, product sales are not contingent upon customer
testing, approval
and/or
acceptance. Professional services revenue is not recognized
until the services have been performed, while product revenue is
recognized at time of shipment as shipping terms are typically
FOB shipping point, as the services do not affect the
functionality of the delivered items.
Product returns have historically been insignificant and as such
are recorded when incurred.
Software
Revenue
The Company sells various software products ranging from
software that is embedded in the hardware to add-on software
that can be sold on a stand-alone basis. Software that is
embedded in the hardware (ie firmware) provides a
user-interface and facilitates the functionality of the
hardware. This software cannot be sold on a stand-
F-54
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
alone basis and is not a significant part of sales or marketing
efforts. This embedded software is considered incidental to the
hardware and is not recognized as a separate unit of accounting
apart from the hardware.
The Company also sells proprietary application software that is
sold as add-on software to their security hardware
configurations. This provides additional functionality to the
security system, such as integration of security access
monitoring. Based on the factors described in footnote two of
AICPA Statement of Position
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition
(SOP 97-2)
the Company considers this type of software to be
more-than-incidental to the hardware components in an
arrangement. This assessment is based on the fact that the
software can be sold on a stand-alone basis. Software products
that are considered more-than-incidental are treated as a
separate unit of accounting apart from the hardware and the
related software product revenue is recognized upon delivery to
the customer. The Company accounts for software that is
more-than-incidental in accordance with
SOP 97-2
whereby the revenue from the sale of software products is
recognized at the time the software is delivered to the
customer, provided all the revenue recognition criteria noted
above have been met, except collectability must be deemed
probable under
SOP 97-2
versus reasonably assured under SAB 104. The Company also
considers
EITF 03-05,
Applicability of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, to Non-Software Deliverables in an
Arrangement Containing More-Than-Incidental Software
(EITF 03-05).
Per
EITF 03-05,
if the software is considered not essential to the functionality
of the hardware, then the hardware is not considered
software related and is excluded from the scope of
SOP 97-2.
All proprietary application software sold by the Company is not
essential to the functionality of the security hardware. The
hardware is not dependent upon these proprietary software
products to function and the customer can fully utilize the
hardware product without any of the software products.
Therefore, in multiple-element arrangements containing hardware
and software, the hardware elements are excluded from
SOP 97-2
and are accounted for in accordance with
EITF 00-21
and SAB 104 at its relative fair value as there is
objective and reliable evidence of fair value for all units of
accounting in these transactions.
Service
Revenue
Service revenue is generated from the sale of professional
services and maintenance contracts. The following describes how
the Company accounts for service transactions, provided all the
other revenue recognition criteria noted above have been met.
Generally, services revenue, which includes maintenance
contracts, security system integration services, system
migration and database conversion services, is recognized upon
delivery of the services. If the professional service project
includes independent milestones, revenue is recognized as
milestones are met and upon acceptance from the customer.
Maintenance revenue is generated from the sale of hardware and
software maintenance contracts. These contracts are generally
for terms. Maintenance revenue is recorded as deferred revenue
and is recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the
related agreement.
Multiple
Element Arrangements
The Company considers sales contracts that include a combination
of systems, software or services to be multiple element
arrangements. Revenue related to multiple element arrangements
is separated in accordance with
EITF 00-21
and
SOP 97-2
based on the relative fair value method. Discounts are allocated
only to the delivered elements. Fair values are determined by
examining the prices charged for when the elements are sold
separately. Undelivered elements generally include maintenance
contract revenue as other professional services are typically
sold separately from the hardware sales.
Advertising
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. During the
years ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company
incurred and expensed approximately $0.5 million,
$0.5 million and $0.4 million in advertising expenses,
respectively, which are included in selling, general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of
operations.
F-55
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Research
and Development
Research and development expenses which consist primarily of
outsourced labor, salaries for personnel and materials are
expensed as incurred.
Warranty
The Company offers a warranty on its products for a period of
two years. Historically, warranty expenses have been
insignificant and as warranty expenses are recorded when
incurred.
Shipping
and Handling
Costs incurred for shipping and handling are included in costs
of revenue in the accompanying statements of operations. During
the years ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, shipping
and handling expenses were approximately $0.4 million,
$0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
using the liability method. Under this method, the Company
provides for deferred income taxes to reflect the tax
consequences in future years for the differences between the
amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial
reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes
using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is
provided to reduce net deferred tax assets to amounts that are
more likely than not to be realized.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Beginning December 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This
statement revises SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes Accounting
Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123(R)
focuses primarily on the accounting for transactions in which an
entity obtains employee services in share-based payment
transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) requires stock-based
compensation cost to be measured at the grant date, based on the
fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the
employees requisite service period (generally the vesting
period). The Company has elected the prospective transition
method as permitted by SFAS No. 123(R) and,
accordingly, previously issued financial statements have not
been restated as a result of adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R). Under the prospective method,
compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective
date (December 1, 2006) (a) based on the requirements
of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments
granted or modified after the effective date and (b) based
on the requirements of APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, for all awards granted to employees prior to the
effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested
on the effective date. All awards granted, modified, or settled
after the date of adoption are accounted for using the
measurement, recognition, and attribution provisions of
SFAS 123(R).
The Company has two stock-based employee compensation plans.
Prior to December 1, 2006, the Company accounted for those
plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB
No. 25, and related interpretations. No stock-based
employee compensation cost was reflected in the accompanying
statements of operations for the year ended November 30,
2006, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise
price equal to or greater than the estimated fair market value
of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The
F-56
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
following table illustrates the effect on net income as if the
Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123 for its stock-based employee compensation
plans as of November 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$
|
1,963
|
|
Stock-based compensation, net of tax
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, pro forma
|
|
$
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For purposes of computing the pro forma amount, the fair value
of stock-based compensation was estimated using a Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the assumptions of a weighted-average
expected life of 10 years, no annual dividend per share,
risk free interest rate of 4.78%, and no volatility (minimum
value method).
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Fair
Value Measurement
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurement. SFAS No. 157 provides a framework
that clarifies the fair value measurement objective within GAAP
and its application under the various accounting standards where
fair value measurement is allowed or required. Under
SFAS No. 157, fair value refers to the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
in the market in which the reporting entity transacts.
SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value
should be based on the assumptions market participants would use
when pricing the asset or liability and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority
to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to
unobservable data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value
measurements to be separately disclosed by level within the fair
value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in
February 2008, FASB Staff Position, or FSP,
No. 157-b,
Effective Date of Statement 157, was issued which delayed
the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The FSP
partially defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
Effective December 1, 2007, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 157 except as it applies to those
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities within the
scope of FSP
No. 157-b.
The partial adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial position and
results of operations. The Company is currently assessing the
impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 157 as it relates
to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities and has not
yet determined the impact that the adoption will have on its
financial position and results of operations.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP,
No. FAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When The
Market for That Asset Is Not Active to clarify the
application of the provisions of SFAS 157 in an inactive
market and how an entity would determine fair value in an
inactive market.
FSP 157-3
is effective immediately and applies to our November 30,
2008 financial statements. The application of the provisions of
FSP 157-3
did not materially impact the Companys financial
statements.
Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 provides an option to
report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value.
GAAP has required different measurement attributes for different
assets and liabilities that can create artificial volatility in
earnings. SFAS No. 159 attempts to mitigate this type
of accounting-induced volatility by enabling companies to report
related assets and liabilities at fair value, which would likely
reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for
hedge accounting. SFAS No. 159 also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements
F-57
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose
different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has
elected not to exercise the option to report selected financial
assets and liabilities at fair value as provided for under
SFAS No. 159, accordingly, there is no impact on the
Companys financial position and results of operations.
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN No. 48). This interpretation
clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 109.
Specifically, FIN No. 48 clarifies the application of
SFAS No. 109 by defining a criterion that an
individual tax position must meet for any part of the benefit of
that position to be recognized in an enterprises financial
statements. Additionally, FIN No. 48 provides guidance
on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods of income taxes, as
well as the required disclosure and transition. FIN 48
specifies that the evaluation of the tax position is a two-step
process: 1) Recognition: determining whether it is
more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon
examination, including resolution of any related appeals or
litigation process, and 2) Measurement: a tax position that
meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured
to determine that amount of benefit that is greater than
50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as
the largest amount of tax benefits that is greater than
50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement with a taxing authority. This interpretation is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting
principle to be recorded as an adjustment to the beginning
balance of retained earnings. However, in February 2008, FSP
No. FIN 48-2
was issued to delay the effective date of FIN No. 48
for certain nonpublic enterprises to the annual financial
statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2007, (applied as of the beginning of the enterprises
fiscal year). The Company is currently evaluating the
requirements of FIN No. 48 and has not yet determined
if the adoption of FIN No. 48 will have a significant
impact on the Companys financial statements.
Business
Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)). This statement improves the
financial reporting of business combinations and clarifies the
accounting for these transactions. SFAS No. 141(R)
(i) requires the recognition and measurement of assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest
in the acquiree at their fair values at the acquisition date,
(ii) requires acquisition costs and any related
restructuring costs to be recognized separately from the
acquisition, (iii) requires step acquisitions to be
recognized at the full amounts of the fair values of the
identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, (iv) changes the
requirements for recognizing assets acquired and liabilities
assumed arising from contingencies, (v) defines a bargain
purchase as a business combination in which the total
acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets
exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, (vi) requires the
recognition of any bargain purchase as a gain in the earnings of
the acquirer, and (vii) requires the recognition of changes
in deferred tax benefits that are recognizable because of a
business combination either in income from continuing operations
in the period of the combination or directly in the contributed
capital, depending upon the circumstances. In addition, acquired
in-process research and development, or IPR&D, is
capitalized as an intangible asset and amortized over its
estimated useful life. The provisions of
SFAS No. 141(R) are to be applied prospectively to
business combinations with acquisition dates on or after the
beginning of an entitys fiscal year that begins on or
after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited.
The adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will change our
accounting treatment for business combinations on a prospective
basis beginning December 1, 2009. The Company is currently
assessing SFAS No. 141R and has not yet determined the
impact that the adoption will have on its financial position and
results of operations.
F-58
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Useful
Life of Intangible Assets
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.
FSP
No. FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
The Company is required to adopt FSP
No. FAS 142-3
effective at the beginning of 2010. The adoption of FSP
No. FAS 142-3
is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys
financial statements.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB and
the AICPA did not or are not believed by management to have a
material impact on the Companys present or future
financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances
in order to conform to the current years presentation.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that
would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. When determining the fair value
measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to
be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal
or most advantageous market in which the Company would transact
and considers assumptions that market participants would use
when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk,
transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.
Fair
Value Hierarchy
SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair
value. A financial instruments categorization within the
fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input
that is significant to the fair value measurement.
SFAS No. 157 establishes three levels of inputs that
may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than
Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume
or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or
model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are
observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data for substantially the full term of the
assets or liabilities.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs to the
valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of
fair value of assets or liabilities.
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
The Company measures financial assets at fair value on a
recurring basis. The Companys investments in money market
funds are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The
Companys money market funds are required to be priced and
have a fair value of $1.00 net asset value per share. These
money market funds are actively traded and reported daily
through a variety of sources. These funds have a credit rating
of A. Since they are actively traded, the fair value of the
money market fund investments has been classified as
level 1.
In 2006, the Company purchased 25% of the outstanding stock in
Hirsch EMEA (EMEA). The stock purchase agreement
included a call option and a put option to purchase the
remaining outstanding shares of EMEA at a price of 1,000,000
Euro and become exercisable contingent on a change in control of
the Company. EMEA is a privately held company with no
level 1 or 2 inputs to measure fair value. As such, the
options were valued using the
F-59
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Black-Scholes American option model with a term of
10 years. The risk free rate was 2.92%, 3.94%, and 4.46% at
November 30, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. The
probability of change of control was 45%, 10%, and 5% at
November 30, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. At
November 30, 2008, the put option was valued at
approximately $518,000, and this amount was recorded as a
liability on the balance sheet and a corresponding charge taken
on the statement of operations. The put option values were not
material for the fiscal years 2007 and 2006 and therefore were
not recorded in the financial statements at November 30,
2007 and 2006. The call option values for were not material for
fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 and therefore were not recorded
in the financial statements at November 30, 2008, 2007, and
2006.
There were no movements between level 1 and level 3
classes of measurements for the years ended November 30,
2008, 2007, and 2006.
Inventories consisted of the following as of November 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
773
|
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
519
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,871
|
|
|
$
|
1,587
|
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of November 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company has a note
receivable from Bridgepoint Systems, Inc
(Bridgepoint) for $54,500 that carried interest at
an annual rate of 9%. The note matured on November 30,
2007. The Company had an option to convert the principal and
accrued interest at maturity date to Bridgepoint common stock at
a price of $0.50 per share. Management is currently in the
process of negotiating terms on the note and believes that the
carrying amount of the note was not impaired at
November 30, 2008.
During fiscal 2005, the Company purchased an investment
consisting of equity securities in Pindi Products, Inc.
(Pindi), a privately held developer of biometric
technology. Management believes that the carrying amount (on the
cost method) of $0.1 million was impaired at
November 30, 2008 and recorded an impairment charge during
the year ended November 30, 2008 which is included in other
(loss) income in the accompanying statements of operations (see
Note 10).
In May 2006, the Company invested approximately
$0.4 million to purchase a 25% interest in Hirsch EMEA
(EMEA), a privately held company located in Europe.
EMEA owns 95% of the outstanding stock of MCV Trading, an
Italian subsidiary (MCV), which operates and
distributes security systems and equipment in Europe, the Middle
East and Asia. The stock purchase agreement included a call
option and a put option to purchase the remaining outstanding
shares of EMEA at a price of 1,000,000 Euro and become
exercisable contingent on a change in control of the Company
(see Note 3). The Companys President is a board
member of EMEA. At the purchase date, the Companys
investment exceeded the net book value of EMEAs equity by
$0.3 million.
As of August 31, 2008, the Company determined that the
investment in EMEA had experienced an other than temporary
decline in value, and recorded an impairment charge of
$0.3 million, which is included in other (loss) income in
the accompanying statements of operations (see Note 10).
For the three months ended November 30, 2008, the Company
recorded a gain of $11,500, representing the Companys
proportionate share of EMEAs
F-60
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
undistributed net income for the three months ended
November 30, 2008, which is included in other (loss) income
in the accompanying statements of operations (see Note 10).
During the years ended November 30 2008, 2007 and 2006, the
Company had sales of approximately $0.2 million,
$0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, to MCV.
As of November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company had
receivables of approximately $0.1 million, $43,000 and
$5,000, respectively, which is included in accounts receivable
in the accompanying balance sheet.
During fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, the Company paid commissions
to EMEA of approximately $0.1 million, $0.1 million, and
$0.1 million, respectively, for the European sales of the
Companys products.
|
|
7.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of November
30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(1,211
|
)
|
|
|
(1,143
|
)
|
|
|
(1,106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
|
$
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
OTHER
ACCRUED LIABILITIES
|
Other accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of
November 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accrued bonuses
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Accrued research and development and acquisition expenses
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
764
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The provision for income tax (benefit) expense consisted of the
following as of November 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(360
|
)
|
|
$
|
959
|
|
|
$
|
1,003
|
|
State
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(664
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,149
|
|
|
$
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences between the U.S. federal statutory income tax
rates and the effective tax rates are as follows for the years
ended November 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Tax at U.S. federal statutory rates
|
|
|
(34.00
|
)%
|
|
|
34.00
|
%
|
|
|
34.00
|
%
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(5.91
|
)
|
|
|
5.61
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
.72
|
|
|
|
.74
|
|
|
|
.59
|
|
Credits
|
|
|
(4.05
|
)
|
|
|
(.45
|
)
|
|
|
(.62
|
)
|
Tax contingency reserve
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2.43
|
|
|
|
.42
|
|
|
|
(1.78
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(39.09
|
)%
|
|
|
40.32
|
%
|
|
|
35.73
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of deferred income taxes were as follows as of
November 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Loss on EMEA
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in put option derivative liability
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAS 123(R)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on state taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
Other income (expense) includes the following non-operating
items for the years ended November 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Income (loss) on equity method investment
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
Loss on investments
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in put option derivative liability
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
$
|
(742
|
)
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997
Incentive Stock Plan
The 1997 Incentive Stock Plan (the 1997 Plan)
provides for the grant of options to employees to purchase
shares of the Companys common stock. The 1997 Plan
includes ISOs for which the option price will not be less than
the estimated fair market value of the shares of the
Companys common stock on the date of the grant. Such fair
values are determined on the date of grant based on an expected
life of 10 years, a risk-free interest rate, a volatility
based on a blended rate of several quoted public market prices
for the common stock of several publicly-traded companies who
are major providers and serve a similar market as the Company,
and no dividend yield. Options expire within a period of not
more than ten years from the date of the grant. Options vest
over 4 to 5 years from the date of issuance. The 1997 Plan
provides for the issuance of up to 100,000 shares of common
stock. As of November 30, 2007, there were
10,000 shares available for issuance under the 1997 Plan.
In February 2006, the Company granted options to purchase a
total of 10,000 shares of common stock to an employee. The
stock options have an exercise price of $9.50 (estimated by
management to be the fair market value of the stock), and were
vested immediately upon issuance. Such stock options expire ten
years from the date of grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 1, 2005
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
8.38
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at November 30, 2006
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
8.53
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at November 30, 2007
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
8.53
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
8.50
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2008
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
8.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-63
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The number of outstanding and exercisable options under the 1997
Plan as of November 30, 2008 is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
Range of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Remaining Life
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Remaining Life
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
(Years)
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
(Years)
|
|
$8.00
|
|
40,000
|
|
$8.00
|
|
4.49
|
|
40,000
|
|
$8.00
|
|
4.49
|
$9.00
|
|
25,000
|
|
$9.00
|
|
0.38
|
|
25,000
|
|
$9.00
|
|
0.38
|
$9.50
|
|
10,000
|
|
$9.50
|
|
7.18
|
|
10,000
|
|
$9.50
|
|
7.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
From time to time, the Company may grant warrants to third party
service providers or directors.
During the years ended November 30, 2007 and 2006, the
Company granted warrants to directors to purchase 12,000 and
6,000 shares of the Companys common stock at an
exercise price of $10.00 and $9.50 per share, respectively
(estimated by management to be the fair market value of the
stock). The warrants vested upon issuance and expire ten years
from the date of grant. There were no warrants granted during
the year ended November 30, 2008.
In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
during the year ended November 30, 2007, the Company
recorded stock-based compensation expense totaling
$0.1 million associated with warrants to purchase
12,000 shares of the Companys common stock granted
during 2007. An additional $0.1 million of stock-based
compensation expense was recorded during the November 30,
2008. The fair value of the 2007 warrant grants amounted to
$8.63 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Such fair
value was determined on the date of grant based on an expected
life of 10 years, a risk-free interest rate of 5.20%, a
volatility of 84.9% based on a blended rate of quoted public
market prices for the common stock of several publicly-traded
companies who are major providers and serve a similar market as
the Company, and no dividend yield. The expense related to
warrants was included in the Selling, General and administration
line in the statement of operations for the year ended
November 30, 2008 and 2007.
During each of the years ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and
2006, the Company issued 4,000 shares of common stock
pursuant to the exercise of stock warrants for cash proceeds of
$34,000, $34,000 and $29,000, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 1, 2005
|
|
|
44,000
|
|
|
$
|
8.45
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2006
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
$
|
8.70
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2007
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2008
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
9.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-64
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The number of outstanding and exercisable warrants as of
November 30, 2008 is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Remaining Life
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
(Years)
|
|
$ 8.00 to $ 8.50
|
|
18,000
|
|
$8.00
|
|
4.09
|
$ 9.00 to $ 9.50
|
|
20,000
|
|
$9.40
|
|
4.56
|
$10.00 to $10.50
|
|
12,000
|
|
$10.00
|
|
9.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
Receivable for Common Stock
Included in stockholders equity as of November 30,
2007 and 2006 are two notes receivable from stockholders. One
note has annual interest at the prime rate (7.5% at
November 30, 2007), was payable to the Company on demand
and was paid in full during the year ended November 30,
2008. The note was issued as consideration for
10,000 shares of the Companys common stock. The other
note had an annual interest rate of prime rate (8.25% at
November 30, 2006) plus 2% and was paid in full during
the year ended November 30, 2007. The note was issued as
consideration for 17,415 shares of the Companys
common stock. During the years ended November 30, 2008,
2007 and 2006, the Company collected $0.1 million, $40,000
and $8,000, respectively, of principal on the notes.
|
|
12.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Operating
Leases
The Company leases its facilities under operating leases with
expiration dates through fiscal 2012. In November 2007, the
Company exercised its five-year option to renew its seven-year
noncancelable building lease commencing December 1, 2007.
This lease also includes a scheduled base rent increase of 3.0%
per year over the term of the lease. At November 30, 2008
and 2006, deferred rent expense totaled approximately $35,000
and $44,000, respectively and is included in other accrued
liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet. There was no
deferred rent expense at November 30, 2007. Rent expense
under the operating leases was approximately $0.5 million,
$0.4 million and $0.4 million for the years ended
November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
At November 30, 2008, future minimum lease payments under
noncancelable operating leases are as follows for the fiscal
years ending November 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
487
|
|
2010
|
|
|
469
|
|
2011
|
|
|
472
|
|
2012
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
1,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger
Termination
The Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with
SCM Microsystems, Inc. (SCM). Under certain
circumstances Hirsch may be required to pay SCM a termination
fee of $1.5 million, plus an amount equal to all
out-of-pocket expenses (excluding the cost of employee time)
incurred by SCM in connection with the merger agreement, the
ancillary agreements, and the merger.
F-65
HIRSCH
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Legal
Matters
From time to time, claims are made against the Company in the
ordinary course of business, which could result in litigation.
Claims and associated litigation are subject to inherent
uncertainties and unfavorable outcomes could occur, such as
monetary damages, fines, penalties or injunctions prohibiting
the Company from selling one or more products or engaging in
other activities. The occurrence of an unfavorable outcome in
any specific period could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations for that period or future
periods. The Company is not presently a party to any pending or
threatened legal proceedings.
The Company has a 401(k) plan that covers substantially all
employees. Employer contributions to the plan are made at the
discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company made no
contributions for the years ended November 30, 2008, 2007
and 2006. The Company paid administrative expenses on behalf of
the plan of approximately $5,000 for each of the years ended
November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
14.
|
ROYALTY
AGREEMENT AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Effective November 1994, the Company entered into a settlement
agreement with two limited partnerships, Secure Keyboards, Ltd.
(Keyboards) and Secure Networks, Ltd.
(Networks), which are related to the Company through
certain common shareholders and limited partners, including the
Companys President, who owns 14% of the Company, 30% of
Keyboards, and 9% of Networks. Under the terms of a previous
agreement, the Company purchased the exclusive rights to certain
patents and technology from Keyboards and Networks.
Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company has
agreed to pay a royalty of 4.25% to Keyboards for the period
from December 1, 1994 to December 31, 2020 and 5.5% to
Networks for the period from December 1, 1994 to
December 31, 2011, based on an allocation of revenues
recognized by the Company starting at 55% and 45% of the
Companys revenues for Keyboards and Networks,
respectively. The royalty is payable when cash is received for
the revenue recognized. The overall allocation of revenues
recognized, upon which the respective royalty is calculated,
will increase by 2.08% annually for Keyboards and decrease by
2.08% annually for Networks through December 31, 2011. No
royalties will be payable to Networks for revenues recognized
after December 31, 2011. The final payment to Networks is
due on January 30, 2012. From January 1, 2012 to
December 31, 2020, the royalty to Keyboards will be based
on 4.25% of all revenues recognized by the Company. The final
royalty payment to Keyboards is due on January 30, 2021.
During the years ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
the Company paid approximately $1.0 million,
$1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in
royalties to Keyboards and Networks combined. At
November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company had a royalty
payable of approximately $0.3 million, $0.4 million
and $0.4 million, respectively, to Keyboards and Networks
combined.
On December 10, 2008, the Company entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Merger with SCM Microsystems, Inc. For each of the
Hirsch shares outstanding, at the effective time of the Merger
Hirsch stockholders will receive $3.00 cash, two shares of SCM
common stock, and a warrant to purchase one share of SCM common
stock at an exercise of $3.00. At the effective time, the Merger
Agreement also provides that outstanding warrants to purchase
shares of Hirsch common stock will be converted into warrants to
acquire shares of SCMs Common Stock, and outstanding
options to purchase shares of Hirsch common stock will be
cancelled. The completion of the merger is contingent upon
customary conditions of closing, including regulatory clearances
and the approval of the stockholders of both companies. The
merger is expected to close during the Companys 2009
fiscal year.
In December 2008, Hirsch entered into an agreement with the
remaining shareholders representing 71% ownership of EMEA to
purchase their shares for consideration of $0.5 million in
cash and 100,000 shares of Hirsch common stock, making EMEA
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hirsch.
F-66
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
On December 10, 2008, SCM Microsystems, Inc.
(SCM or the Company) entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement)
with Hirsch Electronics Corporation, a California corporation
(Hirsch), and two wholly owned subsidiaries of SCM
(formed solely for the purposes of effecting the merger). The
Merger Agreement provides that subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of the conditions set forth therein, through a two-step
merger Hirsch will become a new Delaware limited liability
company and a wholly owned subsidiary of SCM (the
Merger). The Merger is conditioned, among other
things, on the Merger Agreement being approved by the
stockholders of each of SCM and Hirsch, and shares of SCMs
common stock and warrants to be issued in the Merger being
registered on an effective registration statement and authorized
for listing on the NASDAQ.
Pursuant to the proposed merger, the security holders of Hirsch
will receive a combination of SCM common stock, warrants and
cash, for a total valuation that will be determined based on the
price of SCM stock at the time of closing. For each of the
approximately 4,705,735 Hirsch shares outstanding, at the
effective date of the Merger Hirsch stockholders will receive
$3.00 in cash, two shares of SCM common stock, and a warrant to
purchase one share of SCM common stock at an exercise price of
$3.00. At the effective date, the Merger Agreement also provides
that outstanding warrants to purchase shares of Hirsch common
stock will be converted into warrants to acquire shares of
SCMs common stock, and outstanding options to purchase
shares of Hirsch common stock will be cancelled.
This unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data
should be read in conjunction with the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of both SCMs and
Hirschs and the historical financial statements and
accompanying notes of Hirsch (contained elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/information statement and prospectus), and
SCMs historical financial statements and accompanying
notes (contained elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/information statement and prospectus) and appearing in
its historical periodic SEC filings including
Forms 10-K
and 10-Q.
The financial statements of Hirsch and SCM have been prepared in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (US GAAP).
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of
September 30, 2008 reflects the merger and related events
as if they had been consummated on September 30, 2008. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 reflect the merger and related
events as if they had been consummated on January 1, 2007,
the beginning of SCMs 2007 fiscal year. The unaudited pro
forma financial information is presented for informational
purposes only and is not intended to represent or be indicative
of the results of operations that would have been achieved if
the Acquisition had been completed as of the dates indicated,
and should not be taken as representative of future consolidated
results of operations or financial condition of SCM. Preparation
of the unaudited pro forma financial information for all periods
presented required management to make certain judgments and
estimates to determine the pro forma adjustments such as
purchase accounting adjustments, which include, among others,
cost of sales resulted from step up of inventory at fair value,
amortization charges from acquired intangible assets, reduction
in royalty expense due to fair value adjustment of contingent
liabilities assumed related to royalties payable to related
parties, and related income tax effects. In addition, with
respect to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance
sheet at September 30, 2008, management estimated the fair
value of Hirschs assets acquired and liabilities assumed
as of September 30, 2008, based on the purchase price
allocation performed as of the December 10, 2008 Merger
Agreement signing date.
The unaudited pro forma information does not reflect cost
savings, operating synergies or revenue enhancements expected to
result from the Merger or the costs to achieve these cost
savings, operating synergies and revenue enhancements.
F-67
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
Hirsch EMEA
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(Historical)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
25,020
|
|
|
$
|
4,590
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
29,712
|
|
|
$
|
(14,117
|
)
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
$
|
15,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
6,368
|
|
|
|
3,380
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
9,978
|
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
9,755
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
2,134
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
6,599
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
7,966
|
|
Note receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
I
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
37,019
|
|
|
|
11,524
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
49,195
|
|
|
|
(13,197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,511
|
|
|
|
F
|
|
|
|
7,511
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
21,375
|
|
|
|
G
|
|
|
|
21,737
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
2,364
|
|
|
|
I
|
|
|
|
2,519
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,947
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
40,600
|
|
|
$
|
12,062
|
|
|
$
|
671
|
|
|
$
|
53,333
|
|
|
$
|
18,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
71,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,484
|
|
|
$
|
664
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
3,691
|
|
|
$
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
$
|
3,468
|
|
Royalties payable to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
J
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
6,518
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,363
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
H
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
9,247
|
|
|
|
2,321
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
12,111
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,165
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
8,567
|
|
|
|
K
|
|
|
|
9,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
L
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term income taxes payable
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
Long-term royalties payable to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
|
|
J
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
229,675
|
|
|
|
4,514
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
234,564
|
|
|
|
7,909
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
242,473
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(2,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,777
|
)
|
Note receivable for common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
(198,077
|
)
|
|
|
5,292
|
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(193,244
|
)
|
|
|
(4,833
|
)
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
(198,077
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
31,137
|
|
|
|
9,741
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
41,006
|
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
40,600
|
|
|
$
|
12,062
|
|
|
$
|
671
|
|
|
$
|
53,333
|
|
|
$
|
18,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
71,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements.
F-68
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
Hirsch EMEA
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(Historical)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
30,435
|
|
|
$
|
21,990
|
|
|
$
|
682
|
|
|
$
|
53,107
|
|
|
$
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
P
|
|
|
$
|
52,953
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
17,781
|
|
|
|
10,492
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
28,426
|
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
P
|
|
|
|
29,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
(801
|
)
|
|
|
S
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
10,505
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
23,688
|
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,329
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
5,472
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
12,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,559
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
7,132
|
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,326
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
Q
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
17,126
|
|
|
|
7,872
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
25,482
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(4,472
|
)
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
|
(1,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,288
|
)
|
Interest income (expense)
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
|
|
T
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
Foreign currency gains (losses) and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,179
|
)
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
(2,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,452
|
)
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(1,148
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(1,336
|
)
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
U
|
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(3,292
|
)
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(1,610
|
)
|
|
|
(1,580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,190
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(239
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income per share from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute basic and diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
|
15,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,411
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
25,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements.
F-69
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCM
|
|
|
Hirsch
|
|
|
Hirsch EMEA
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
19,377
|
|
|
$
|
17,148
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
36,926
|
|
|
$
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
P
|
|
|
$
|
36,635
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
10,961
|
|
|
|
8,184
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
19,399
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
P
|
|
|
|
19,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
S
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
8,416
|
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
16,763
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,058
|
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
7,010
|
|
|
|
4,416
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
11,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,762
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,638
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
Q
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
14,786
|
|
|
|
8,365
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
23,487
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(6,370
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(6,724
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,804
|
)
|
Interest income (expense)
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
T
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
Foreign currency gains (losses) and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(935
|
)
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(6,663
|
)
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(7,683
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,088
|
)
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
U
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(6,814
|
)
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(7,540
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,913
|
)
|
Gain from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(537
|
)
|
|
$
|
(189
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7,087
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income per share from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute basic and diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,411
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
25,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements.
F-70
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data was
prepared using the purchase method of accounting and was based
on the historical financial statements of SCM and Hirsch. The
purchase method of accounting was based on Statement on
Financial Accounting Standard or SFAS No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R))
issued by the Financial Accounting Statement Board
(FASB) in December 2007. The provisions of
SFAS No. 141(R) are to be applied prospectively to
business combinations with acquisition dates on or after the
beginning of an entitys fiscal year that begins on or
after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited.
Since our acquisition of Hirsch will close in fiscal year 2009,
we applied the provisions of SFAS No. 141 (R) for the
purpose of our pro forma disclosures. SCMs fiscal year
ends on December 31 of each year and Hirschs fiscal year
ends on November 30 of each year. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2008
combines the historical SCM balance sheet as of
September 30, 2008 and Hirsch balance sheet as of
August 31, 2008 as if the Merger had closed on
September 30, 2008. The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 combine the historical SCM and Hirsch
statements of operations for their respective twelve months
ended fiscal year 2007 and nine months ended fiscal year 2008 as
if the Acquisition had closed on January 1, 2007. The
statement of operations of Hirsch for the twelve months ended
fiscal year 2007 and nine months ended fiscal year 2008 have
been regrouped and reclassified to match the groupings of
SCMs statement of operations and are prepared in
accordance with the recognition, valuation and disclosure
principles used by SCM. As a result, some of the line items in
Hirschs historical audited statement of operations for the
twelve months ended fiscal year 2007 will not agree to the pro
forma statement of operations of Hirsch for the twelve months
ended fiscal year 2007.
Hirschs historical balance sheet as of August 31,
2008 and historical statement of operations for the nine months
ended August 31, 2008 were derived by subtracting the
financial information for the three months ended
November 30, 2008 from the audited financial statements as
of November 30, 2008.
As of December 10, 2008, the Merger Agreement date, Hirsch
owned 29.4% of the outstanding shares of Hirsch EMEA, Inc.
(Hirsch EMEA), a British Virgin Islands company. Hirsch EMEA
means Hirsch EMEA, Inc. together with each of its other
subsidiaries. At the date of closing of the merger, Hirsch shall
have purchased all of the outstanding shares of Hirsch EMEA for
an aggregate of $0.5 million in cash and 100 thousand
shares of Hirsch Common Stock. Accordingly, the Hirsch EMEA
financial information is included in the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2008
as if the purchase of the outstanding shares of Hirsch EMEA had
been consummated on September 30, 2008 and in the unaudited
pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 as if the purchase of the outstanding
shares of Hirsch EMEA had been consummated on January 1,
2007.
|
|
2.
|
Purchase
Price Allocation
|
On December 10, 2008, SCM entered into the Merger Agreement
with Hirsch. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, in
exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of Hirsch, SCM
will pay an aggregate of $14.1 million in cash and will
issue 9,411,470 shares of SCM Common Stock at the closing.
In addition, SCM will issue 4,705,735 warrants to purchase
SCM common stock at an exercise price of $3.00. The Merger
Agreement also provides that each warrant to purchase shares of
Hirsch common stock outstanding that has not terminated or
exercised immediately prior to the effective date of the Merger
will be converted into a warrant to purchase the number of
shares of SCM common stock equal to the number of shares of
Hirsch common stock that could have been purchased upon the full
exercise of such warrants, multiplied by the conversion ratio,
rounded down to the nearest whole share. The per share exercise
price for each new warrant to purchase SCM common stock will be
determined by dividing the per share exercise price of the
Hirsch common stock subject to each warrant as in effect
immediately prior to the effective date of the Merger by the
conversion ratio, and rounding that result up to the nearest
cent. Conversion ratio means the quotient obtained
by dividing the aggregate value of the merger consideration per
Hirsch common stock, divided by the
30-day
volume weighted average price of SCMs common
F-71
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
stock (as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market during the
30 days preceding the day prior to the day of the effective
date of the Merger). The acquisition will be accounted for under
the purchase method of accounting under
SFAS No. 141(R), and under this method of accounting,
the total purchase price was approximately $26,924 thousand as
of the date when the Merger Agreement was signed. As the total
purchase price is dependent on the closing price of SCMs
common stock as of the date of closing of the merger, the final
total purchase price can materially differ from the value
estimated for these unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements.
The following table summarizes the components of the estimated
total purchase price determined for accounting purposes of these
pro forma condensed combined financial statements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for Hirsch common stock
|
|
$
|
14,117
|
|
Fair value of common stock issued
|
|
|
11,953
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued
|
|
|
701
|
|
Fair value of warrants converted
|
|
|
153
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
26,924
|
|
The fair value of the shares of SCM common stock issued was
estimated using the closing price of SCMs common stock on
December 10, 2008 (the merger agreement signing date), or
$1.27 per share.
The purchase consideration was allocated based on the estimated
fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in the Merger. An allocation of
the purchase price was made to major categories of assets and
liabilities in the accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements based on managements best
estimates, assuming the Acquisition had closed on
September 30, 2008. The excess of the purchase price over
the estimated fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to
goodwill.
SCM has obtained a preliminary third-party valuation of
intangible assets and liability assumed related to royalties
payable to related parties, which will be finalized upon
completion of the merger; thus the provisional measurements of
intangible assets, liability related to royalties payable to
related parties, and the resulting goodwill and deferred income
taxes are subject to change. The final allocation of the
purchase price will be determined after the merger is
consummated and after completion of a thorough analysis to
determine the fair values of Hirschs tangible and
identifiable intangible assets and liabilities. Accordingly, the
final purchase accounting adjustments could be materially
different from the preliminary unaudited pro forma adjustments
presented herein. Any increase or decrease in the fair values of
Hirschs assets, liabilities and other items, as compared
to the information shown herein, will change the portion of the
purchase price allocable to goodwill and will also impact the
combined statements of operations due to adjustments in
amortization or accretion related to the adjusted assets or
liabilities. The allocation of the purchase price in the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of
September 30, 2008 was prepared based on managements
best estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed.
F-72
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As described above, Hirsch shall have purchased all of the
outstanding shares of Hirsch EMEA before the Merger closes.
Accordingly, the purchase price is allocated to the combined
assets and liabilities of Hirsch and Hirsch EMEA as presented
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash & cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,192
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
Notes receivable and other assets
|
|
|
550
|
|
Deferred taxes and tax receivable
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
286
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(984
|
)
|
Royalties payable to related parties
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(845
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
9,416
|
|
Indefinite lives (Unamortizable) intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities in connection with acquired intangibles
assets and inventory fair value adjustment
|
|
|
(9,114
|
)
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed related to royalties payable
to related parties
|
|
|
(6,600
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets in connection with liabilities assumed
related to royalties payable to related parties
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated purchase price
|
|
$
|
26,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See further discussion of purchase accounting adjustments in
Note 3.
Intangible assets of $21,416 thousand consist primarily of
developed technology, customer relationships, and trade names.
Developed technology relates to Hirschs contributory
nature of technology which is currently generating revenue.
Customer relationships relate to Hirschs ability to sell
existing, in-process and future versions of its products to its
existing customers. Trade names represent future value to be
derived associated with the use of existing trade names. Of the
$21,416 thousand of acquired intangible assets, $7,500
thousand was provisionally assigned to registered trade names
that are not subject to amortization. The remaining amount of
$13,916 thousand of acquired intangible assets is subject
to amortization. SCM expects to amortize developed technology
and customer relationships over their expected useful life of
15 years. Assumed liabilities related to royalties payable
to related parties is estimated based on a future stream of
revenues. The Company has estimated the acquisition date fair
value of these liabilities to be $6,600 thousand, based on a
discounted cash flow valuation technique. As noted earlier, the
fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets and
liabilities assumed related to royalties payable to related
parties is provisional pending completion of the final valuation.
Of the total estimated purchase price, $7,511 thousand was
allocated to goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the
purchase price of an acquired business over the fair value of
the underlying net tangible and intangible assets.
F-73
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, goodwill resulting from business combinations is
tested for impairment at least annually (or more frequently if
certain indicators are present). In the event that management
determines that the value of goodwill has become impaired, the
combined company will incur an accounting charge for the amount
of impairment during the fiscal quarter in which the
determination is made.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements have been prepared as if the Acquisition
was completed on September 30, 2008 for balance sheet
purposes and on January 1, 2007 for statement of operations
purposes and reflect the following pro forma adjustments:
(A) Adjustment to record payment of approximately $14,117
thousand in cash for Hirsch common stock.
(B) Adjustment to record payment of approximately $500
thousand in cash for Hirsch EMEA common stock.
(C) Adjustment to eliminate intercompany accounts
receivable and accounts payable between Hirsch and Hirsch EMEA
due to consolidation of Hirsch EMEA by Hirsch upon acquisition.
(D) Adjustment to record acquired inventory at fair value.
(E) Adjustment to eliminate the investment in Hirsch EMEA
due to consolidation of Hirsch EMEA by Hirsch upon acquisition.
(F) Adjustment to record the goodwill resulting from the
Merger.
(G) Adjustment to record the fair value of intangible
assets acquired, which includes developed technology, customer
relationships and trade names.
(H) Adjustment to eliminate valuation of put option for
outstanding shares in Hirsch EMEA.
(I) Adjustment to record deferred tax assets for fair value
of liabilities assumed related to royalties payable to related
parties.
(J) Adjustment to record the fair value of liabilities
assumed related to royalties payable to related parties.
(K) Adjustment to record deferred tax liabilities related
to identifiable intangible assets.
(L) Adjustment to record deferred tax liabilities related
to fair value adjustment on inventory.
(M) To adjust additional paid-in capital as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate Hirschs historical shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
(4,514
|
)
|
Eliminate Hirsch EMEAs historical shareholders equity
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
Fair value of SCM common stock issued in connection with the
acquisition
|
|
|
11,944
|
|
Fair value of SCM stock warrants issued in connection with the
acquisition
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,909
|
|
(N) Adjustment to eliminate Hirschs and Hirsch
EMEAs historical common stock, accumulated earnings,
accumulated other comprehensive income and note receivable.
(O) Adjustment to include the par value of common stock
issued as a purchase consideration.
(P) Adjustment to eliminate intercompany revenue and cost
of revenue between Hirsch and Hirsch EMEA.
F-74
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Q) To record amortization of the acquired intangible
assets as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets presented
as part of the following captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue (related to developed technology)
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
Amortization intangible assets (related to customer
relationships)
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
(R) Adjustment to record the cost of revenue resulting from
step up of inventory fair value.
(S) Adjustment to reduce royalty expense due to recording
of liabilities assumed related to royalties payable to related
parties during purchase price accounting.
(T) To decrease interest income by applying the average
rate of return for the respective periods to the assumed net
decrease in SCMs cash balance of approximately $14,117
thousand used to fund the Merger.
(U) To record income tax impact of pro forma adjustments.
The pro forma combined benefit from income taxes does not
reflect the amounts that would have resulted had SCM and Hirsch
filed consolidated income tax returns during the periods
presented.
(V) The pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share is
based on the historical weighted-average number of shares of SCM
common stock used in computing basic and diluted net loss per
share, plus approximately 9.4 million shares of SCM common
stock assumed to be issued in connection with the Merger.
F-75
Annex A
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
among
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC.,
DEER ACQUISITION, INC.,
HART ACQUISITION LLC
and
HIRSCH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Dated as of December 10, 2008
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE I
|
|
DEFINITIONS
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.1
|
|
Certain Defined Terms
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
Table of Definitions
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE II
|
|
THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Section 2.1
|
|
The FirstStep Merger
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Section 2.2
|
|
The SecondStep Merger
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Section 2.3
|
|
Closing; Effective Time
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Section 2.4
|
|
Effects of the Mergers
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 2.5
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 2.6
|
|
Directors; Officers
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 2.7
|
|
Subsequent Actions
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 2.8
|
|
Conversion of Stock
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Section 2.9
|
|
Dissenting Shares
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Section 2.10
|
|
Options
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Section 2.11
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Section 2.12
|
|
Payment for Company Shares; Company Warrants
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Section 2.13
|
|
Lock-Up
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Section 2.14
|
|
Company Transaction Expenses
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Section 2.15
|
|
Taxes and Withholding
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE III
|
|
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
Organization and Qualification
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Section 3.2
|
|
Authority
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Section 3.3
|
|
No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Section 3.4
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Section 3.5
|
|
Equity Interests
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Section 3.6
|
|
Financial Statements; No Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Section 3.7
|
|
[Intentionally Deleted]
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section 3.8
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section 3.9
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 3.10
|
|
Compliance with Law; Permits
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 3.11
|
|
Export Control Laws
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 3.12
|
|
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 3.13
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 3.14
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 3.15
|
|
Labor and Employment Matters
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section 3.16
|
|
Title to, Sufficiency and Condition of Assets
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Section 3.17
|
|
Real Property
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section 3.18
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section 3.19
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section 3.20
|
|
Tax Treatment
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
Section 3.21
|
|
Environmental Matters
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
Section 3.22
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Section 3.23
|
|
Affiliate Interests and Transactions
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
Section 3.24
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
Section 3.25
|
|
Brokers
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
Section 3.26
|
|
Accuracy of Information Furnished; Disclosure
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
Section 3.27
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
Section 3.28
|
|
Customers and Suppliers
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
Section 3.29
|
|
Warranties
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
Section 3.30
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
Section 3.31
|
|
Key Employees
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
Section 3.32
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV
|
|
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE ACQUIROR, FIRST-STEP
MERGER SUB AND SECOND-STEP MERGER SUB
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
Organization
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
Section 4.2
|
|
Authority
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
Section 4.3
|
|
No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
Section 4.4
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
Section 4.5
|
|
Equity Interests
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
Section 4.6
|
|
SEC Reports; Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
Section 4.7
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Section 4.8
|
|
Compliance with Law; Permits
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Section 4.9
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Section 4.10
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Section 4.11
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Section 4.12
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Section 4.13
|
|
Accuracy of Information Furnished; Disclosure
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Section 4.14
|
|
Brokers
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE V
|
|
COVENANTS
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
Section 5.1
|
|
Conduct of Business of the Company and its Subsidiaries Prior to
the Closing
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
Section 5.2
|
|
Conduct of Business of the Acquiror Prior to the Closing
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
Section 5.3
|
|
Exclusivity
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
Section 5.4
|
|
S4 Registration Statement
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
Section 5.5
|
|
Shareholder Meetings
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Section 5.6
|
|
Access to Information
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Section 5.7
|
|
Notification of Certain Matters; Supplements to Disclosure
Schedules
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Section 5.8
|
|
Spreadsheet
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Section 5.9
|
|
Takeover Statutes
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Section 5.10
|
|
Stock Option Plans; Additional Director Warrants; Employee
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Section 5.11
|
|
Confidentiality
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Section 5.12
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Section 5.13
|
|
Commercially Reasonable Efforts
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Section 5.14
|
|
Indemnification; Directors and Officers Insurance
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Section 5.15
|
|
Tax-Free Reorganization
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
Section 5.16
|
|
Second-Step Merger
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Section 5.17
|
|
Internal Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 5.18
|
|
FIRPTA Compliance
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 5.19
|
|
Employee Invention Agreements
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 5.20
|
|
Business Plan
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 5.21
|
|
2008 Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
Section 5.22
|
|
Board Appointment
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI
|
|
SURVIVABILITY
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
Section 6.1
|
|
Survival of Representations, Warranties, and Covenants
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII
|
|
CONDITIONS TO CLOSING
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
Section 7.1
|
|
General Conditions
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
Section 7.2
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of the Company
|
|
|
A-58
|
|
Section 7.3
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub
and Second-Step Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
|
|
TERMINATION
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
Section 8.1
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
Section 8.2
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-62
|
|
Section 8.3
|
|
Remedies
|
|
|
A-62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IX
|
|
GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
|
|
A-63
|
|
Section 9.1
|
|
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
A-63
|
|
Section 9.2
|
|
Amendment and Modification
|
|
|
A-63
|
|
Section 9.3
|
|
Extension
|
|
|
A-63
|
|
Section 9.4
|
|
Waiver
|
|
|
A-63
|
|
Section 9.5
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-63
|
|
Section 9.6
|
|
Interpretation
|
|
|
A-64
|
|
Section 9.7
|
|
Entire Agreement
|
|
|
A-64
|
|
Section 9.8
|
|
No Third-Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
Section 9.9
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
Section 9.10
|
|
Submission to Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
Section 9.11
|
|
Assignment; Successors
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
Section 9.12
|
|
Enforcement
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
Section 9.13
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
Section 9.14
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
Section 9.15
|
|
Waiver of Jury Trial
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
Section 9.16
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
Section 9.17
|
|
Facsimile Signature
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
Section 9.18
|
|
Time of Essence
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
Section 9.19
|
|
No Presumption Against Drafting Party
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
A-iii
Index
of Exhibits and Annexes
|
|
|
|
|
Annex A
|
|
Parties to Stockholder Agreement
|
|
|
Annex B
|
|
Parties to New Employment Agreements
|
|
|
Annex C
|
|
Parties to Non-Competition Agreements
|
|
|
Annex D
|
|
Directors and Officers of Interim Surviving Corporation and
Final Surviving Entity
|
|
|
Annex E
|
|
Illustrative Calculation of Conversion Ratio
|
|
|
Exhibit A
|
|
Form of Company Voting Agreement
|
|
|
Exhibit B
|
|
Form of Stockholder Agreement
|
|
|
Exhibit C
|
|
Form of New Employment Agreement
|
|
|
Exhibit D
|
|
Form of Non-Competition Agreement
|
|
|
Exhibit E
|
|
First-Step Certificate of Merger
|
|
|
Exhibit F
|
|
Second-Step Certificate of Merger
|
|
|
Exhibit G
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement
|
|
|
Exhibit H
|
|
EMEA Purchase Agreement
|
|
|
A-iv
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of December 10,
2008 (this Agreement), is between SCM
Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Acquiror), Deer Acquisition, Inc., a
California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Acquiror (First-Step Merger Sub), Hart
Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror (Second-Step
Merger Sub) and Hirsch Electronics Corporation, a
California corporation (the Company).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and the Company
intend to effect a merger of First-Step Merger Sub with and into
the Company (the First-Step Merger) in
accordance with this Agreement and the Cal Code (as defined
below), with the Company to be the surviving corporation of the
First-Step Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror
(the Company, as the surviving corporation after the First-Step
Merger, the Interim Surviving Corporation);
WHEREAS, it is intended that, as soon as practicable following
the First-Step Merger, the Interim Surviving Corporation shall
be merged with and into Second-Step Merger Sub (the
Second-Step Merger and, together with the
First-Step Merger, the Merger) in accordance
with this Agreement and the Cal Code (as defined below), and the
DGCL (as defined below), with Second-Step Merger Sub to be the
surviving entity of the Second-Step Merger as a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Acquiror (but treated as a disregarded entity
for tax purposes) (the surviving entity after the Second-Step
Merger, the Final Surviving Entity);
WHEREAS, the respective boards of directors of Acquiror,
First-Step Merger Sub, Second-Step Merger Sub and the Company
have deemed this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby, including the Merger, to be fair to and in the best
interests of their respective shareholders, and approved and
declared advisable the Merger upon the terms and subject to he
conditions of this Agreement;
WHEREAS, the respective boards of directors of Acquiror,
First-Step Merger Sub, Second-Step Merger Sub and the Company
have approved and adopted this Agreement;
WHEREAS, Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub, Second-Step Merger Sub
and the Company desire to make certain representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with the
Merger and also to prescribe various conditions to the Merger;
WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, the
Acquiror Board has amended the Preferred Stock Rights Agreement
to prevent the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby from triggering the rights thereunder;
WHEREAS, as an inducement for the Acquiror, First-Step Merger
Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub to enter into this Agreement and
to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, holders of
approximately 22% (as of the date hereof) of the outstanding
shares of common stock, no par value, of the Company (the
Company Common Stock), have concurrently with
the execution of this Agreement entered into (or with respect to
shares beneficially owned by one of the directors that are held
in record name by CEDE & Co., will enter into within
30 days) agreements substantially in the form of
Exhibit A attached hereto (the
Company Voting Agreements) with
Acquiror and the Company pursuant to which, among other things,
such shareholders have irrevocably agreed to vote or cause to be
voted, and granted to designees of Acquiror a proxy to vote, all
shares of Company Common Stock currently beneficially owned by
them, and all shares of Company Common Stock that may in the
future become beneficially owned by them, in favor of this
Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements;
WHEREAS, as an inducement for the Acquiror First-Step Merger Sub
and Second-Step Merger Sub to enter into this Agreement and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, concurrently
with the execution of this Agreement, the individuals set forth
on Annex A attached hereto have entered into a
stockholders agreement substantially in the form of
Exhibit B attached hereto (the Stockholder
Agreement);
A-1
WHEREAS, as an inducement for the Acquiror, First-Step Merger
Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub to enter into this Agreement and
to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, concurrently
with the execution of this Agreement, the employees of the
Company set forth on Annex B hereto have entered
into employment agreements substantially in the form of
Exhibit C attached hereto (the New
Employment Agreements), and the individual set forth
on Annex C attached hereto have entered into
non-competition agreements substantially in the form of
Exhibit D attached hereto (the
Non-Competition Agreements); and
WHEREAS, the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub, Second-Step Merger
Sub and the Company intend for federal income tax purposes that
the First-Step Merger and the Second-Step Merger (collectively,
the Reorganization), qualify as a
reorganization described in Section 368(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Tax
Code), within the manner described in Revenue Ruling
2001-46, and
that this Agreement constitute a plan of
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 1.368-2(g)
of the regulations promulgated under the Tax Code.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
covenants and agreements herein contained, and intending to be
legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1 Certain
Defined Terms. For purposes of this Agreement:
Acquiror Board shall mean the Board of
Directors of the Acquiror.
Acquiror Common Stock means the common
stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Acquiror.
Acquiror Material Adverse Effect means
any event, change, occurrence or effect that (a) would have
a material adverse effect on the business, operation, assets,
liabilities, condition (financial or otherwise) or results of
operations or prospects of the Acquiror and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole or (b) would prevent, materially delay or
materially impede the performance by the Acquiror of its
obligations under this Agreement or the consummation by the
Acquiror of the transactions contemplated hereby, other than any
event, change, occurrence or effect resulting from
(i) changes in general economic, financial market, business
or geopolitical conditions, (ii) changes in the trading
volume or market price of the Acquiror Common Stock in and of
itself, (iii) general changes or developments in any of the
industries in which the Acquiror or its Subsidiaries operate,
(iv) changes in any applicable Laws or applicable
accounting regulations or principles or interpretations thereof,
(v) any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or war or any
act of terrorism or (vi) the announcement or pendency of
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.
Acquiror Material Contract means any
Contract that would be required to be filed by the Acquiror as a
material contract pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)
of
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act.
Acquiror Option Plans means,
collectively, the Acquiror 1997 Stock Plan, the Acquiror 1997
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Acquiror 1997 Director
Option Plan, the Dazzle Multimedia, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan,
the Acquiror 2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, the Dazzle
Multimedia, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, and the Acquiror 2007
Stock Option Plan.
Acquiror Shareholders means holders of
shares of Acquiror Common Stock.
Acquiror Superior Proposal means any
unsolicited, bona fide, written Acquisition Proposal made by a
Person other than the Company or its Affiliates (a) for
consideration and on terms which the Acquirors Board
determines, in its good faith judgment after consultation with
the Acquirors outside legal counsel and independent
financial advisors, and taking into account all of the terms and
conditions of such proposal, would, if consummated, require
Acquiror to forego the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby and be more favorable to the Acquiror
Shareholders than those provided hereunder (including any
adjustment to the terms and conditions
A-2
proposed by the Company in response to such proposal pursuant to
Section 5.5(c)(ii) or otherwise, and including any
break-up
fees and expense reimbursement provisions), and (b) that
the Acquirors Board determines in its good faith judgment
is reasonably likely of being completed on the terms proposed on
a timely basis, taking into account all material financial,
regulatory, legal and other aspects of such proposal and the
Person making such proposal; provided, that, for
the purposes of this definition of Acquiror Superior
Proposal references in the definition of Acquisition
Proposal to 50% shall be changed to 80%.
Acquisition Proposal means,
(i) with respect to the Company, any inquiry, proposal or
offer from any Person or group of Persons (other than an
inquiry, proposal or offer from the other party hereto) relating
to, or that is reasonably likely to lead to, any direct or
indirect acquisition or purchase, in one transaction or a series
of transactions, including any merger, reorganization,
consolidation, tender offer, self-tender, exchange offer, stock
acquisition, asset acquisition, binding share exchange, business
combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, joint
venture or similar transaction, (A) of assets or businesses
of the Company and its Subsidiaries, that generate 15% or more
of the net revenues or net income or that represent 10% or more
of the total assets (based on fair market value), of the Company
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately prior to
such transaction, (B) of 10% or more of any class of
capital stock, other equity security or voting power of the
Company or any resulting parent company of the Company,
(C) involving the Company or any of its Subsidiaries,
individually or taken together, whose businesses constitute 10%
or more of the net revenues, net income or total assets (based
on fair market value) of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, immediately prior to such transaction, in each case
other than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; or
(ii) with respect to the Acquiror, any inquiry, proposal or
offer from any Person or group of Persons (other than an
inquiry, proposal or offer from the other party hereto) relating
to, or that is reasonably likely to lead to, any direct or
indirect acquisition or purchase, in one transaction or a series
of transactions, including any merger, reorganization,
consolidation, tender offer, self-tender, exchange offer, stock
acquisition, asset acquisition, binding share exchange, business
combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, joint
venture or similar transaction, (A) of assets or businesses
of the Acquiror or its Subsidiaries, that generate 50% or more
of the net revenues or net income or that represent 50% or more
of the total assets (based on fair market value), of the
Acquiror and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately
prior to such transaction, (B) of 50% or more of any class
of capital stock, other equity security or voting power of the
Acquiror or any resulting parent company of the Acquiror,
(C) involving the Acquiror or any of its Subsidiaries,
individually or taken together, whose businesses constitute 50%
or more of the net revenues, net income or total assets (based
on fair market value) of the Acquiror or its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, immediately prior to such transaction, in each case
other than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Acquiror Proxy Statement means any
such proxy statement or any other soliciting material to be
distributed to shareholders in connection with the Merger
(including any amendments or supplements) and any schedules
required to be filed with the SEC in connection therewith,
together with all amendments and supplements thereto, in each
case in the form mailed or delivered to Acquiror Shareholders.
Action means any claim, counterclaim,
action, suit, dispute, inquiry, proceeding (administrative or
otherwise), audit or investigation by or before any Governmental
Authority, or any other arbitration, mediation or similar
proceeding.
Affiliate means, with respect to any
Person, any other Person that directly, or indirectly through
one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is
under common control with, such first Person, including any
Subsidiary of such Person.
Aggregate Value of the Merger Consideration Per
Share means the aggregate dollar value of the
Merger Consideration Per Share, with the value of the Acquiror
Common Stock to be calculated based on the
30-day
volume weighted average price of Acquiror Common Stock, as
reported on Nasdaq during the 30 days preceding the day
prior to the day of the Effective Time, and the value of the
Acquiror Warrants determined using the
Black-Scholes
pricing model and such assumptions as Acquiror and the Company
deem reasonable and appropriate.
Ancillary Agreements means the Company
Voting Agreement, the Stockholder Agreement, the New Employment
Agreements, the Non-Competition Agreements, and the Warrant
Agreement and all other agreements, documents and instruments
required to be delivered by any party pursuant to this
Agreement, and any other
A-3
agreements, documents or instruments entered into at or prior to
Effective Time in connection with this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby.
Business Day means any day that is not
a Saturday, a Sunday or other day on which banks are required or
authorized by Law to be closed in the states of Delaware, New
York or California, or the country of Germany.
Company Board means the Board of
Directors of the Company.
Company Information Statement means
any such information statement or any other soliciting material
to be distributed to shareholders in connection with the Merger,
together with all amendments and supplements thereto, in each
case in the form mailed or delivered to Company Shareholders.
Company Material Adverse Effect means
any event, change, circumstance, occurrence, effect that
(a) would have a material adverse effect on the business,
operation, assets, liabilities, condition (financial or
otherwise) or results of operations or prospects of the Company
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole or (b) would
prevent, materially delay or materially impede the performance
by the Company of its obligations under this Agreement or the
consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated
hereby, other than any event, change, occurrence or effect
resulting from (i) changes in general economic, financial
market, business or geopolitical conditions, (ii) general
changes or developments in any of the industries in which the
Company or its Subsidiaries operate, (iii) changes in any
applicable Laws or applicable accounting regulations or
principles or interpretations thereof, (iv) any outbreak or
escalation of hostilities or war or any act of terrorism or
(v) the announcement or pendency of this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby.
Company Option means each outstanding
option to purchase shares of Company Common Stock, whether
granted under the Company Option Plans or otherwise.
Company Option Plans means the Company
Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated May 6, 1998, the Company
Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated April 10, 1985 and any
other option, equity or similar plan of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries.
Company Shareholders means holders of
shares of Company Common Stock.
Company Superior Proposal means any
unsolicited, bona fide written Acquisition Proposal made by a
Person other than the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub,
Second-Step Merger Sub or their Affiliates (a) for
consideration and on terms which the Companys Board
determines, in its good faith judgment after consultation with
the Companys outside legal counsel and independent
financial advisors, and taking into account all of the terms and
conditions of such proposal, would, if consummated, be more
favorable to the Company Shareholders than those provided
hereunder (including any adjustment to the terms and conditions
proposed by the Acquiror in response to such proposal pursuant
to Section 5.5(c)(i) or otherwise, and including any
break-up
fees and expense reimbursement provisions), and (b) that
the Companys Board determines in its good faith judgment
is reasonably likely of being completed on the terms proposed on
a timely basis, taking into account all material financial,
regulatory, legal and other aspects of such proposal and the
Person making such proposal; provided, that, for the
purposes of this definition of Company Superior
Proposal references in the definition of Acquisition
Proposal to 10% or 15% shall be changed to 80%.
Company Transaction Expenses means all
fees and expenses payable by the Company and its Subsidiaries in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
and the Ancillary Agreements, including, without limitation,
(i) any fees and expenses payable to any and all attorneys,
accountants, financial advisors and other professionals,
(ii) any change of control, severance of other similar
payments and (iii) any bankers, brokers or
finders fees for persons not engaged by the Acquiror,
First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger Sub;
provided, however, that the fees and expenses of
accountants relating to the audit of the Company and its
Subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2008
shall not be deemed Company Transaction Expenses
hereunder.
Company Warrants means warrants
outstanding to purchase shares of the Company Common Stock.
Consent means any consent, approval,
waiver, release, exemption, notice, authorization,
qualification, registration, declaration, filing, Permit, order
or similar item.
A-4
Contract means any contract,
agreement, arrangement, commitment, understanding or other
obligation, whether written or oral, including without
limitation, any note, bond, mortgage, indenture, lease, license,
Permit, or franchise.
control, including the terms
controlled by and under
common control with, means the possession,
directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the
direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether
through the ownership of voting securities, as trustee or
executor, as general partner or managing member, by Contract or
otherwise, including the ownership, directly or indirectly, of
securities having the power to elect a majority of the board of
directors or similar body governing the affairs of such Person.
Conversion Ratio means the quotient
equal to (i) Aggregate Value of the Merger Consideration
Per Share divided by (ii) the
30-day
volume weighted average price of Acquirors Common Stock,
as reported on Nasdaq during the 30 days preceding the day
prior to the day of the Effective Time.
DGCL means the Delaware General
Corporation Law, including, without limitation, the Delaware
Limited Liability Company Act.
EMEA means Hirsch EMEA, Inc. (fka
tSecu Inc), together with MCV Trading SRL, and each of its other
Subsidiaries.
Employee means, as to the Company, any
current or former employee, consultant, independent contractor
or director of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and, as to
the Acquiror, any current or former employee, consultant,
independent contractor or director of the Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries.
Employment Agreement means each
employment, severance, separation, settlement, relocation,
repatriation, expatriation arrangement or other Contract
(including, any offer letter or any agreement providing for
acceleration of the vesting of Company Options or any other
agreement providing for compensation or benefits) between the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries and any Employee.
Encumbrance means any charge, claim,
limitation, condition, equitable interest, mortgage, lien,
option, pledge, security interest, easement, encroachment, right
of first refusal, adverse claim or restriction of any kind,
including any restriction on or transfer or other assignment, as
security or otherwise, of or relating to use, quiet enjoyment,
voting, transfer, receipt of income or exercise of any other
attribute of ownership.
ERISA Affiliate means, as to the
Company, any trade or business, whether or not incorporated,
under common control with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
and that, together with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries,
is treated as a single employer within the meaning of
Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Tax Code.
Exchange Act means the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
GAAP means United States generally
accepted accounting principles and practices, consistently
applied, as in effect on the date hereof.
Governmental Authority means any
United States or
non-United
States federal, national, supranational, state, provincial,
local or similar government, governmental, regulatory (including
any stock exchange) or administrative authority, branch, agency
or commission or any court, tribunal, or arbitral or judicial
body (including any grand jury).
Immediate Family, with respect to any
specified Person, means such Persons spouse, parents,
children and siblings, including adoptive relationships and
relationships through marriage, or any other relative of such
Person that shares such Persons home.
Intellectual Property means all
intellectual property rights arising from or associated with the
following, whether protected, created or arising under the Laws
of the United States or any other jurisdiction or Governmental
Authority: (i) trade names, trademarks and service marks
(registered and unregistered), domain names and other Internet
addresses or identifiers, trade dress and similar rights, and
applications (including intent to use applications) to register
any of the foregoing (collectively,
Marks); (ii) patents and patent
applications (collectively, Patents);
(iii) copyrights (registered and unregistered) and
applications for registration (collectively,
Copyrights); (iv) know-how, inventions,
methods, processes, technical data, specifications, research and
A-5
development information, technology, product roadmaps, customer
lists and any other information, in each case to the extent any
of the foregoing derives economic value (actual or potential)
from not being generally known to other persons who can obtain
economic value from its disclosure or use, excluding any
Copyrights or Patents that may cover or protect any of the
foregoing (collectively, Trade Secrets); and
(v) moral rights, publicity rights, data base rights and
any other proprietary or intellectual property rights of any
kind or nature that do not comprise or are not protected by
Marks, Patents, Copyrights or Trade Secrets.
Joint Proxy Statement means the
Company Information Statement together with the Acquiror Proxy
Statement, together with all amendments and supplements thereto.
knowledge, with respect to a party,
means the knowledge of any officer or director of such party and
such knowledge as would be imputed to such persons upon due
inquiry.
Law means any statute, law, ordinance,
regulation, rule, code, executive order, injunction, judgment,
decree or order of any Governmental Authority.
Leased Real Property means all real
property leased, subleased or licensed to the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
otherwise has a right or option to use or occupy, or does in
fact use or occupy, together with all structures, facilities,
fixtures, systems, improvements and items of property previously
or hereafter located thereon, or attached or appurtenant
thereto, and all easements, rights and appurtenances relating to
the foregoing.
Lien shall mean any lien, pledge,
charge, claim, mortgage, security interest or other encumbrance
of any sort.
Nasdaq means the NASDAQ Global Market,
any successor inter-dealer quotation system operated by The
NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC or any successor thereto.
Maximum Number of Company Shares means
(A) 4,705,735 (assuming the purchase of EMEA is complete
prior to the Effective Time) or, in the event the purchase of
EMEA is not complete, 4,605,735, plus (B) the number of
shares of Company Common Stock, if any, that are actually issued
prior to the Effective Time as the result of the exercise prior
to the Effective Time of any Company Option or Company Warrant
that was outstanding on, and disclosed to Acquiror on or prior
to, the date hereof and that was duly exercised in accordance
with its respective terms and conditions without any amendment
thereto, less (C) the number of Dissenting Shares, less
(D) any shares of Company Common Stock described in
Sections 2.8(a)(iii) or (v).
Owned Real Property means all real
property owned by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries,
together with all structures, facilities, fixtures, systems,
improvements and items of property previously or hereafter
located thereon, or attached or appurtenant thereto, and all
easements, rights and appurtenances relating to the foregoing.
Permits means all permits, licenses,
franchises, approvals, certificates, Consents, waivers,
concessions, exemptions, orders, registrations, notices or other
authorizations of any Governmental Authority necessary for the
applicable Person to own, lease and operate its properties and
to carry on its business as currently conducted and proposed to
be conducted.
Person means an individual,
corporation, partnership, limited liability company, limited
liability partnership, syndicate, person, trust, association,
organization or other entity, including any Governmental
Authority, and including any successor, by merger or otherwise,
of any of the foregoing.
Preferred Stock Rights Agreement means
the preferred stock rights agreement, dated November 8,
2002, between Acquiror and American Stock Transfer and
Trust Company.
Related Party, with respect to any
specified Person, means: (i) any Affiliate of such
specified Person, or any director, officer, general partner or
managing member of such Affiliate; (ii) any Person who
serves, or within the past five years has served, as a director,
officer, partner, member or in a similar capacity of such
specified Person; (iii) any Immediate Family member of a
Person described in clause (ii); or (iv) any other Person
who holds, individually or together with any Affiliate of such
other Person and any member(s) of such Persons Immediate
Family, more than 5% of the outstanding voting equity or
ownership interests of such specified Person.
A-6
Representative means, with respect to
any Person, their respective officers, directors, principals,
Employees, financial and legal advisors, counsel, auditors,
agents, lenders, bankers and other representatives.
Return means any return, declaration,
report, statement, information statement and other document
required to be filed with respect to Taxes.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act means the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
Securities Act means the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended.
Settlement Agreement means the
settlement agreement between the Company, Secure Keyboards, Ltd.
and Secure Networks, Ltd., dated November 14, 1994, as
amended.
Subsidiary means, with respect to any
Person, any other Person controlled by such first Person,
directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries. All
references in this Agreement to the Subsidiaries of a Person
shall be deemed to include all direct and indirect Subsidiaries
of such Person. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained herein, EMEA and its subsidiaries shall each be deemed
to be a Subsidiary of the Company for all purposes hereunder.
Taxes means: (i) all federal,
state, local, foreign and other net income, gross income, gross
receipts, sales, use, ad valorem, transfer, franchise, profits,
registration, license, lease, service, service use, withholding,
payroll, employment, excise, severance, stamp, occupation,
premium, property, windfall profits, customs, duties or other
taxes, fees, assessments or charges of any kind whatsoever,
together with any interest and any penalties, additions to tax
or additional amounts with respect thereto; (ii) any
liability for payment of amounts described in clause (i)
whether as a result of transferee liability, of being a member
of an affiliated, consolidated, combined or unitary group for
any period or otherwise through operation of Law; and
(iii) any liability for the payment of amounts described in
clauses (i) or (ii) as a result of any tax sharing,
tax indemnity or tax allocation agreement or any other express
or implied agreement to indemnify any other Person.
Section 1.2 Table
of Definitions. The following terms have the
meanings set forth in the Sections referenced below:
|
|
|
Definition
|
|
Location
|
|
2007 Financial Statements
|
|
3.6(a)
|
2008 Financial Statements
|
|
3.6(a)
|
2008 Subsidiary Financial Statements
|
|
3.6(a)
|
Acquiror
|
|
Preamble
|
Acquiror Board
|
|
1.1
|
Acquiror Board Recommendation
|
|
5.4(b)(ii)
|
Acquiror Common Stock
|
|
1.1
|
Acquiror Disclosure Schedules
|
|
Article IV
|
Acquiror Material Adverse Effect
|
|
1.1
|
Acquiror Material Contracts
|
|
1.1
|
Acquiror Option Plans
|
|
1.1
|
Acquiror Products
|
|
4.12(d)
|
Acquiror Proxy Statement
|
|
1.1
|
Acquiror Shareholder Approval
|
|
4.2(a)
|
Acquiror Shareholders
|
|
1.1
|
Acquiror Shareholders Meeting
|
|
5.5(b)(i)
|
Acquiror Superior Proposal
|
|
1.1
|
Acquiror Warrant
|
|
2.8(a)(i)(C)
|
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
1.1
|
Action
|
|
1.1
|
A-7
|
|
|
Definition
|
|
Location
|
|
Affiliate
|
|
1.1
|
Aggregate Cash Merger Consideration
|
|
2.8(a)(ii)(A)
|
Aggregate Merger Consideration
|
|
2.8(a)(ii)
|
Aggregate Stock Merger Consideration
|
|
2.8(a)(ii)(B)
|
Aggregate Value of the Merger Consideration Per Share
|
|
1.1
|
Aggregate Warrant Merger Consideration
|
|
2.8(a)(ii)(C)
|
Agreement
|
|
Preamble
|
Ancillary Agreements
|
|
1.1
|
Board Recommendation Change
|
|
5.5(c)
|
Business Day
|
|
1.1
|
Cal Code
|
|
2.1
|
Cash Merger Consideration Per Share
|
|
2.8(a)(i)(A)
|
CERCLA
|
|
3.21(e)(iii)
|
Certificates
|
|
2.12(b)
|
Closing
|
|
2.3(a)
|
Closing Date
|
|
2.3(a)
|
Common Stock Transaction
|
|
2.13(a)
|
Company
|
|
Preamble
|
Company Balance Sheet
|
|
3.6(c)
|
Company Board
|
|
1.1
|
Company Board Recommendation
|
|
5.5(a)(ii)
|
Company Common Stock
|
|
Recitals
|
Company Disclosure Schedules
|
|
Article III
|
Company Information Statement
|
|
1.1
|
Company Material Adverse Effect
|
|
1.1
|
Company Material Contracts
|
|
3.22(a)
|
Company Option Plans
|
|
1.1
|
Company Permitted Encumbrances
|
|
3.16(a)
|
Company Products
|
|
3.18(m)
|
Company Registered IP
|
|
3.18(e)
|
Company Shareholder Approval
|
|
3.2(a)
|
Company Shareholders
|
|
1.1
|
Company Shareholders Meeting
|
|
5.5(a)(i)
|
Company Shares
|
|
2.8(a)(i)
|
Company Software
|
|
3.18(j)
|
Company Superior Proposal
|
|
1.1
|
Company Transaction Expenses
|
|
1.1
|
Company Voting Agreements
|
|
Recitals
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
5.11
|
Consent
|
|
1.1
|
Contract
|
|
1.1
|
Control
|
|
1.1
|
controlled by
|
|
1.1
|
Conversion Ratio
|
|
1.1
|
A-8
|
|
|
Definition
|
|
Location
|
|
Copyrights
|
|
1.1
|
D&O Policy
|
|
5.14(b)
|
DGCL
|
|
1.1
|
Dissenting Shareholder
|
|
2.9(a)
|
Dissenting Shares
|
|
2.9(a)
|
Effective Time
|
|
2.3(b)
|
EMEA
|
|
1.1
|
Employee
|
|
1.1
|
Employee Invention Agreements
|
|
5.18
|
Employment Agreement
|
|
1.1
|
Encumbrance
|
|
1.1
|
Environmental Laws
|
|
3.21(e)(i)
|
Environmental Permits
|
|
3.21(e)(ii)
|
ERISA
|
|
3.14(a)(i)
|
ERISA Affiliate
|
|
1.1
|
Exchange Act
|
|
1.1
|
Export Approvals
|
|
3.11(a)
|
FCPA
|
|
3.12
|
Final Surviving Entity
|
|
2.1, Recitals
|
Financial Statements
|
|
3.6(a)
|
FIRPTA Compliance Certificate
|
|
5.17
|
First-Step Merger
|
|
Recitals
|
First-Step Merger Certificate of Merger
|
|
2.3(b)
|
First-Step Merger Sub
|
|
Preamble
|
Form S-4
|
|
5.4(a)
|
GAAP
|
|
1.1
|
Governmental Authority
|
|
1.1
|
Hazardous Substances
|
|
3.21(e)(iii)
|
Immediate Family
|
|
1.1
|
Inbound License Agreements
|
|
3.18(h)
|
Indemnified Party
|
|
5.14(a)
|
Indemnifying Party
|
|
5.14(a)
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
1.1
|
Interim Financial Statements
|
|
3.6(a)
|
Interim Subsidiary Financial Statements
|
|
3.6(a)
|
Interim Surviving Corporation
|
|
2.1, Recitals
|
IRS
|
|
3.14(b)
|
Joint Proxy Statement
|
|
1.1
|
knowledge
|
|
1.1
|
Law
|
|
1.1
|
Lease Agreements
|
|
3.17(a)
|
Leased Real Property
|
|
1.1
|
Lien
|
|
1.1
|
Lock-Up Period
|
|
2.13(a)
|
A-9
|
|
|
Definition
|
|
Location
|
|
Marks
|
|
1.1
|
Maximum Number of Company Shares
|
|
1.1
|
Merger
|
|
Recitals
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
2.8(a)(i)
|
Merger Consideration Per Share
|
|
2.8(a)(i)(C)
|
Multiemployer Plan
|
|
3.14(c)
|
Multiple Employer Plan
|
|
3.14(c)
|
Nasdaq
|
|
1.1
|
New Employment Agreements
|
|
Recitals
|
Non-Competition Agreements
|
|
Recitals
|
Open Source License
|
|
3.18(j)
|
Option
|
|
1.1
|
Outside Date
|
|
8.1(d)
|
Owned Real Property
|
|
1.1
|
Patents
|
|
1.1
|
Paying Agent
|
|
2.12(a)
|
PBGC
|
|
3.14(f)
|
Permits
|
|
1.1
|
Person
|
|
1.1
|
Plans
|
|
3.14(a)(iv)
|
Preferred Stock Rights Agreement
|
|
1.1
|
Related Party
|
|
1.1
|
Release
|
|
3.21(e)(iv)
|
Reorganization
|
|
Recitals
|
Representative
|
|
1.1
|
Return
|
|
1.1
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
1.1
|
Schedule of Expenses
|
|
2.14
|
SEC Reports
|
|
4.6
|
Second-Step Merger
|
|
Recitals
|
Second-Step Merger Certificate of Merger
|
|
2.3(c)
|
Second-Step Merger Effective Time
|
|
2.3(c)
|
Second-Step Merger Sub
|
|
Preamble
|
Securities Act
|
|
1.1
|
Settlement Agreement
|
|
1.1
|
Software
|
|
3.18(j)
|
Spreadsheet
|
|
5.8
|
Standards Body
|
|
3.18(o)
|
Stock Merger Consideration Per Share
|
|
2.8(a)(i)(B)
|
Stockholder Agreement
|
|
Recitals
|
Subsidiary
|
|
1.1
|
Subsidiary Balance Sheet
|
|
3.6(c)
|
Tax Code
|
|
Recitals
|
Taxes
|
|
1.1
|
A-10
|
|
|
Definition
|
|
Location
|
|
Trade Secrets
|
|
1.1
|
under common control with
|
|
1.1
|
Warrant Agreement
|
|
2.8(a)(i)(C)
|
Warrant Consideration Per Share
|
|
2.8(a)(i)(C)
|
Warrants
|
|
1.1
|
ARTICLE II
THE MERGER
Section 2.1 The
First-Step Merger. Upon the terms and subject
to the conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective Time and
in accordance with the California Corporations Code (the
Cal Code), First-Step Merger Sub shall be
merged with and into the Company pursuant to which (a) the
separate corporate existence of First-Step Merger Sub shall
cease, (b) the Company shall be the surviving corporation
in the First-Step Merger (the Interim Surviving
Corporation) and shall continue its corporate
existence under the Laws of the State of California as a
wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Acquiror, and (c) in
accordance with the Cal Code all of the properties, rights,
privileges, powers and franchises of the Company and First-Step
Merger Sub will vest in the Interim Surviving Corporation, and
all of the debts, liabilities, obligations and duties of the
Company and First-Step Merger Sub will become the debts,
liabilities, obligations and duties of the Interim Surviving
Corporation.
Section 2.2 The
Second-Step Merger. Upon the terms and
subject to the conditions of this Agreement, at the Second-Step
Merger Effective Time and in accordance with the Cal Code and
the DGCL, the Interim Surviving Corporation shall be merged with
and into the Second-Step Merger Sub pursuant to which,
(a) the separate corporate existence of the Interim
Surviving Corporation shall cease, (b) the Second-Step
Merger Sub shall be the surviving entity in the Second-Step
Merger (the Final Surviving Entity) and shall
continue its existence under the DGCL as a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Acquiror, and (c) in accordance with the
Cal Code and the DGCL all of the properties, rights, privileges,
powers and franchises of the Interim Surviving Corporation and
Second-Step Merger Sub will vest in the Final Surviving Entity,
and all of the debts, liabilities, obligations and duties of the
Interim Surviving Corporation and Second-Step Merger Sub will
become the debts, liabilities, obligations and duties of the
Final Surviving Entity.
Section 2.3 Closing;
Effective Time.
(a) The closing of the First-Step Merger (the
Closing) shall take place at the offices of
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 555 Mission Street,
Suite 3000, San Francisco, California 94105, at
10:00 A.M., pacific time, on or before the fifth (5th)
Business Day following the satisfaction or, to the extent
permitted by applicable Law, waiver of all conditions to the
obligations of the parties set forth in Article VII
(other than such conditions as may, by their terms, only be
satisfied at the Closing or on the Closing Date), or at such
other place or at such other time or on such other date as the
parties mutually may agree in writing. The day on which the
Closing takes place is referred to as the Closing
Date.
(b) As soon as reasonably practicable on the Closing Date,
the parties shall cause a certificate of merger substantially in
the form attached as Exhibit E to be executed and
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of California
(the First-Step Merger Certificate of
Merger), executed in accordance with the relevant
provisions of the Cal Code. The First-Step Merger shall become
effective upon the filing of the First-Step Merger Certificate
of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of California
or at such other time as the parties shall agree and as shall be
specified in the First Step Certificate of Merger. The date and
time when the First-Step Merger shall become effective is herein
referred to as the Effective Time.
(c) As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective
Time and in any event within sixty (60) days of the
Effective Time, the Acquiror shall cause a certificate of merger
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F
to be executed and filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware (together with any certificate of merger or
agreement of merger required to be filed in the State of
California in connection with the Second-Step Merger in
accordance with the relevant provisions of the Cal Code, the
Second-Step Merger Certificate of
A-11
Merger
), executed in accordance with the
relevant provisions of the DGCL. The Second-Step Merger shall
become effective upon the filing of the Second-Step Merger
Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware or at such other time as the parties shall agree and
as shall be specified in the Second-Step Merger Certificate of
Merger. The date and time when the Second-Step Merger shall
become effective is herein referred to as the
Second-Step Merger Effective Time.
Section 2.4 Effects
of the Mergers.
(a) At the Effective Time, the First-Step Merger shall have
the effects provided for herein and in the applicable provisions
of the Cal Code.
(b) At the Second Step Effective Time, the Second Step
Merger shall have the effects provided for herein and in the
applicable provisions of the Cal Code and the DGCL.
Section 2.5 Articles
of Incorporation and Bylaws.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, (a) the
articles of incorporation of the First-Step Merger Sub, as in
effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall be the
articles of incorporation of the Interim Surviving Corporation
until amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and
applicable Law and (b) the bylaws of the First-Step Merger
Sub, as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall
be the bylaws of the Interim Surviving Corporation until amended
in accordance with the provisions thereof and applicable Law.
(b) From and after the Second-Step Merger Effective Time,
(a) the certificate of formation of the Second-Step Merger
Sub, as in effect immediately prior to the Second-Step Merger
Effective Time, shall be the certificate of formation of the
Final Surviving Entity until amended in accordance with the
provisions thereof and applicable Law and (b) the operating
agreement of the Second-Step Merger Sub, as in effect
immediately prior to the Second-Step Merger Effective Time,
shall be the operating agreement of the Final Surviving Entity
until amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and
applicable Law.
Section 2.6 Directors;
Officers.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, the individual set
forth on Annex D shall be the director of the
Interim Surviving Corporation until the earlier of his
resignation or removal or until his respective successor is duly
elected and qualified, as the case may be, and from and after
the Second-Step Merger Effective Time, the Final Surviving
Entity shall be managed by Acquiror, as its sole member.
(b) From and after the Effective Time, the individuals set
forth on Annex D as the Officers of the
Interim Surviving Entity shall serve as the officers of
the Interim Surviving Corporation in the capacities set forth
opposite such individuals names until the earlier of their
resignation or removal or until their respective successors are
duly elected and qualified, as the case may be, and from and
after the Second-Step Merger Effective Time, the individuals set
forth on Annex D as the Officers of the Final
Surviving Entity shall serve as the officers of the Final
Surviving Entity in the capacities set forth opposite such
individuals names until the earlier of their resignation
or removal or until their respective successors are duly elected
and qualified, as the case may be.
Section 2.7 Subsequent
Actions.
(a) If, at any time after the Effective Time, the Interim
Surviving Corporation shall consider or be advised that any
deeds, bills of sale, assignments, assurances or any other
actions or things are necessary or desirable to vest, perfect or
confirm of record or otherwise in the Interim Surviving
Corporation its right, title or interest in, to or under any of
the rights, properties or assets of either the Company or
First-Step Merger Sub acquired or to be acquired by the Interim
Surviving Corporation as a result of or in connection with the
First-Step Merger or otherwise to carry out this Agreement, the
officers and directors of the Interim Surviving Corporation
shall be authorized to execute and deliver, in the name of and
on behalf of either the Company or First-Step Merger Sub, all
such deeds, bills of sale, assignments and assurances and to
take and do, in the name and on behalf of each of such
corporations or otherwise, all such other actions and things as
may be necessary or desirable to vest, perfect or confirm any
and all right, title and interest in, to and under such rights,
properties or assets in the Interim Surviving Corporation or
otherwise to carry out this Agreement.
A-12
(b) If, at any time after the Second-Step Merger Effective
Time, the Final Surviving Entity shall consider or be advised
that any deeds, bills of sale, assignments, assurances or any
other actions or things are necessary or desirable to vest,
perfect or confirm of record or otherwise in the Final Surviving
Entity its right, title or interest in, to or under any of the
rights, properties or assets of either the Company, First-Step
Merger Sub, the Interim Surviving Corporation or the Second-Step
Merger Sub acquired or to be acquired by the Final Surviving
Entity as a result of or in connection with the Second-Step
Merger or otherwise to carry out this Agreement, the officers
and directors of the Final Surviving Entity shall be authorized
to execute and deliver, in the name of and on behalf of either
the Company, First-Step Merger Sub, the Interim Surviving
Corporation or the Second-Step Merger Sub all such deeds, bills
of sale, assignments and assurances and to take and do, in the
name and on behalf of each of such corporations or otherwise,
all such other actions and things as may be necessary or
desirable to vest, perfect or confirm any and all right, title
and interest in, to and under such rights, properties or assets
in the Final Surviving Entity or otherwise to carry out this
Agreement.
Section 2.8 Conversion
of Stock.
(a) At the Effective Time, by virtue of the First-Step
Merger and without any further action on the part of the
Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub, the Company or any holder of
any shares of Company Common Stock or any shares of capital
stock of First-Step Merger Sub:
(i) Each share of Company Common Stock that is issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (which shall
include any shares of Company Common Stock issued in connection
with the exercise prior to the Effective Time of any Company
Option or Company Warrant that was outstanding on, and disclosed
to Acquiror on or prior to, the date hereof and that was duly
exercised in accordance with its respective terms and conditions
without any amendment thereto, but which shall exclude any
shares of Company Common Stock described in
Sections 2.8(a)(iii) and (v) and any
Dissenting Shares) (the Company Shares) shall
immediately cease to be outstanding, shall automatically be
cancelled and retired, shall cease to exist and, subject to
Section 2.8(a)(ii) shall be converted into the right to
receive, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement
and adjusted for any stock split, stock dividend or other
similar event by the Company, the following:
(A) an amount of cash equal to $3.00 without any interest
thereon (the Cash Merger Consideration Per
Share);
(B) two (2) shares of Acquiror Common Stock (the
Stock Merger Consideration Per Share);
(C) a warrant to purchase one (1) share of Acquiror
Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $3.00 per share,
exercisable for two years following the third anniversary of the
Effective Time in accordance with a warrant agreement
(Warrant Agreement) substantially in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit G (each an
Acquiror Warrant and, such Acquiror Warrants
distributed as set forth in this Section 2.8(a)(i)(C), the
Warrant Consideration Per Share and, together
with the Cash Merger Consider Per Share and the Stock Merger
Consideration Per Share, the Merger Consideration Per
Share).
The aggregate consideration to be paid hereunder to the holders
of the shares of Company Common Stock that are issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time is referred
to herein as the Merger Consideration.
(ii) Notwithstanding Section 2.8(a)(i), the
maximum aggregate amount of Merger Consideration that the
Acquiror is required to pay hereunder (excluding any amount (or
value in the event that consideration other than cash is paid)
that the Acquiror is required to pay with respect to any
Dissenting Shares, the Aggregate Merger
Consideration) with respect to each component of the
Aggregate Merger Consideration, shall not exceed:
(A) (1) the Maximum Number of Company Shares,
multiplied by (2) the Cash Merger Consideration Per Share
(the Aggregate Cash Merger Consideration);
(B) (1) the Maximum Number of Company Shares,
multiplied by (2) Stock Merger Consideration Per Share (the
Aggregate Stock Merger
Consideration); and
A-13
(C) (1) the Maximum Number of Company Shares,
multiplied by (2) Warrant Merger Consideration Per Share
(the Aggregate Warrant Merger Consideration).
Accordingly, in the event that the actual number of Company
Shares outstanding at the Effective Time exceeds the Maximum
Number of Company Shares, then the Aggregate Merger
Consideration will be allocated pro rata among the actual number
of Company Shares outstanding at the Effective Time in lieu of
the per share allocation described in
Section 2.8(a)(i).
(iii) Each share of Company Common Stock that is owned by
the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger Sub
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall automatically be
cancelled and retired and shall cease to exist, and no cash or
other consideration shall be delivered or deliverable in
exchange therefor.
(iv) If, between the date of this Agreement and the
Effective Time, the outstanding shares of Acquiror Common Stock
have been changed into, or exchanged for, a different number of
shares or a different class, by reason of any stock dividend,
subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization, split,
combination or exchange of shares, appropriate and proportionate
adjustments shall be made to the Stock Merger Consideration Per
Share, Warrant Consideration Per Share, Aggregate Stock Merger
Consideration, Aggregate Warrant Merger Consideration and the
Conversion Ratio to provide the holders of Company Shares and
Company Warrants the same economic effect as contemplated by
this Agreement prior to such event.
(v) Each share of Company Common Stock that is held in the
treasury of the Company or owned by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries immediately prior to the Effective Time shall
automatically be cancelled and retired and shall cease to exist,
and no cash or other consideration shall be delivered or
deliverable in exchange therefor.
(b) Each share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share,
of First-Step Merger Sub issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into one fully
paid share of common stock, no par value, of the Interim
Surviving Corporation.
(c) At the Second-Step Effective Time, by virtue of the
Second-Step Merger and without any further action on the part of
the Acquiror, the Interim Surviving Corporation, the Second-Step
Merger Sub, or any holder of any shares of the capital stock of
the Interim Surviving Corporation or Second-Step Merger Sub or
any other person (i) the membership interests of the
Second-Step Merger Sub that are issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Second-Step Effective Time shall
immediately cease to be outstanding, shall automatically be
cancelled and retired and shall cease to exist, and
(ii) the shares of common stock, no par value, of the
Interim Surviving Corporation that are issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Second-Step Effective Time shall be
converted into the right to receive, in the aggregate, 100% of
the membership interests of the Final Surviving Entity.
(d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Section 2.8, at the Effective Time, by virtue of the
First-Step Merger and without any action on the part of
Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub, Second-Step Merger Sub, the
Company or the holders of any shares of Company Common Stock,
Dissenting Shares shall be treated in accordance with
Section 2.9.
Section 2.9 Dissenting
Shares.
(a) Any shares of Company Common Stock that are issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and that
have not been voted for approval of this Agreement and the
Merger or consented thereto in writing (or with respect to which
the holder has not otherwise effectively waived its rights under
Chapter 13 of the Cal Code) and with respect to which a
demand for payment and appraisal has been properly made in
accordance with Chapter 13 of the Cal Code
(Dissenting Shares) will not be converted
into the right to receive the Merger Consideration otherwise
payable with respect to the Company Shares after the Effective
Time, except as set forth below. If a holder of Dissenting
Shares (a Dissenting Shareholder) withdraws
his or her demand for such payment and appraisal, with the
consent of the Company, or such Dissenting Shares (or such other
shares of Company Common Stock with respect to which
dissenters rights have not terminated) become ineligible
for such payment and appraisal, then, as of the Effective Time
or the occurrence of such event of withdrawal or ineligibility,
whichever last occurs, such holders Dissenting Shares (or
such other shares of Company Common Stock) will
A-14
cease to be Dissenting Shares (or, in the case of such other
shares of Company Common Stock, the dissenters rights
shall have terminated) and will be deemed to be Company Shares
and converted into the right to receive, and will be
exchangeable for, the Merger Consideration into which such
Company Shares would have been converted pursuant to
Section 2.8, without any interest thereon.
(b) The Company shall give Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub
and Second-Step Merger Sub prompt notice of any demand received
by the Company from a holder of shares of Company Common Stock
for appraisal of their shares and Acquiror shall have the right
to participate in all negotiations and proceedings with respect
to such demand. The Company agrees that, except with the prior
written consent of Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and
Second-Step Merger Sub, or as required under the Cal Code, the
Company will not voluntarily make any payment with respect to,
or settle or offer or agree to settle, any such demand for
appraisal. Each Dissenting Shareholder who, pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 13 of the Cal Code, becomes entitled
to payment of the value of the Dissenting Shares will receive
payment therefor after the value thereof has been agreed upon or
finally determined pursuant to such provisions, and any Merger
Consideration that would have been payable with respect to such
Dissenting Shares will be retained by Acquiror.
Section 2.10 Options.
(a) At the Effective Time, without any further action on
the part of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub, the Company or
any holder of any Company Option, each Company Option
outstanding as of the Effective Time shall be terminated and
cancelled and shall be no longer in force or effect and neither
Acquiror, nor the Interim Surviving Corporation, nor the Final
Surviving Entity, will assume, be bound by or have any
obligation with respect to any Company Option or any Company
Stock Option Plan or stock option agreement by which any such
Company Option was issued or granted.
(b) At or prior to the Effective Time, and subject to the
review and approval of the Acquiror, the Company shall take all
actions necessary to effect the transactions contemplated by
this Section 2.10 under the Company Option Plans and
all Company Option agreements and any other applicable plan or
arrangement of the Company (whether written or oral, formal or
informal), including delivering all notices required thereby,
obtaining all necessary Consents from the holders of Company
Options, and causing the Company Board and the compensation
committee of the Company Board, as applicable to adopt any
resolutions and take any other such actions. Materials to be
submitted to the holders of Company Options in connection with
any notice required under this Section 2.10(b) shall
be subject to review and approval by the Acquiror.
Section 2.11 Warrants.
(a) At the Effective Time, each Company Warrant outstanding
as of the Effective Time and set forth on
Schedule 2.11(a) shall be exchangeable pursuant to
Section 2.12 hereof into Acquiror Warrants to
purchase a number of shares of Acquiror Common Stock equal to
(i) the number of shares of Company Common Stock that could
have been purchased upon the full exercise of such Company
Warrant multiplied by (ii) the Conversion
Ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole share. For each share
of Acquiror Common Stock to be received upon the exercise of
such Acquiror Warrants, the exercise price shall be an amount
equal to (x) the exercise price for acquiring one share of
Company Common Stock under the applicable Company Warrant
divided by (y) the Conversion Ratio, rounded
up to the nearest cent. Except as described above, each Acquiror
Warrant will be evidenced by a Warrant Agreement substantially
in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G. Attached
as Annex E is an example of the calculation of the
set forth in this Section 2.11(a) related to the
conversion of a Company Warrant. Any Company Warrant that is not
set forth on Schedule 2.11(a) shall not be
exchangeable for or otherwise converted into an Acquiror
Warrant, but shall instead be cancelled and shall be no longer
in force or effect.
(b) At or prior to the Effective Time, and subject to the
review and approval of the Acquiror, the Company shall take all
actions necessary for the Company to effect the transactions
contemplated by this Section 2.11 relating to the
Company Warrants (whether written or oral, formal or informal),
including delivering all notices, obtaining all necessary
Consents from the holders of Company Warrants, and causing the
Company Board and the compensation committee of the Company
Board, as applicable to adopt any resolutions and take any other
such actions. Materials to be submitted to the holders of
Company Warrants in connection with any notice required under
this Section 2.11 shall be subject to review and
approval by the Acquiror.
A-15
Section 2.12 Payment
for Company Shares; Company Warrants.
(a) Prior to the Effective Time, the Acquiror shall
designate a bank or trust company reasonably acceptable to the
Company to act as paying agent in connection with the Merger
(the Paying Agent) pursuant to a paying agent
agreement providing for, among other things, the matters set
forth in this Section 2.12. The Acquiror shall make
available to the Paying Agent for the benefit of the Company
Shareholders and holders of Company Warrants, as needed, the
Merger Consideration to which such Company Shareholders shall be
entitled at the Effective Time pursuant to
Section 2.8(a) and the Acquiror Warrants to which
such holders of Company Warrants shall be entitled at the
Effective Time pursuant to Section 2.11. Any such
funds that comprise the Merger Consideration may be invested by
the Acquiror, in its sole discretion pending payment therefor by
the Paying Agent to the Company Shareholders. Earnings from such
investments shall be the sole and exclusive property of the
Acquiror, and no part thereof shall accrue to the benefit of
Company Shareholders or the holders of Company Warrants.
(b) As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective
Time, the Acquiror shall cause the Paying Agent to mail to each
holder of record of a certificate or certificates that,
immediately prior to the Effective Time evidenced outstanding
shares of Company Common Stock (the
Certificates) that were converted into
the right to receive the Merger Consideration described in
Section 2.8(a), at the address set forth opposite
each such Company Shareholders name on the Spreadsheet
(i) a letter of transmittal (which shall specify that
delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to the
Certificates shall pass, only upon proper delivery of the
Certificates to the Paying Agent and shall be in such form and
have such other provisions as the Acquiror may reasonably
specify), and (ii) instructions for use in effecting the
surrender of the Certificates in exchange for payment therefor.
Acquiror will give the Company a reasonable opportunity to
review and comment on such letter of transmittal and the
Acquiror shall give due consideration to such comments thereon
that are reasonably and timely proposed by the Company. Upon
surrender of a Certificate for cancellation to the Paying Agent
or such other agent or agents as may be appointed by the
Acquiror, together with such letter of transmittal duly
completed and validly executed in accordance with the
instructions thereto, the holder of such Certificate shall be
entitled to receive in exchange therefor (as soon as reasonably
practicable), the applicable portion of the Merger
Consideration, without interest and less any applicable
withholding taxes, with respect to the Company Shares formerly
represented by such Certificate, and such Certificate shall,
upon such surrender, be cancelled. If payment in respect of any
Certificate is to be made to a Person other than the Person in
whose name such Certificate is registered, it shall be a
condition of payment that the Certificate so surrendered shall
be properly endorsed or shall otherwise be in proper form for
transfer, that the signatures on such Certificate or any related
stock power shall be properly guaranteed and that the Person
requesting such payment shall have established to the
satisfaction of the Acquiror and the Paying Agent that any
transfer and other Taxes required by reason of such payment to a
Person other than the registered holder of such Certificate have
been paid or are not applicable. Until surrendered in accordance
with the provisions of this Section 2.12, any
Certificate (other than Certificates representing shares of
Company Common Stock described in
Sections 2.8(a)(iii) and (v) and any
Dissenting Shares) shall be deemed, at any time after the
Effective Time, to represent only the right to receive the
Merger Consideration as contemplated by this
Section 2.12. No portion of the Merger Consideration
shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Certificate
with respect to shares of Company Common Stock formerly
represented thereby until the holder of record of such
Certificate shall have surrendered such Certificate and the
letter of transmittal, duly completed and validly executed in
accordance with the instructions thereto, and any other required
documents.
(c) As soon as reasonably practicable following the
Effective Time, the Acquiror shall cause the Paying Agent to
mail to each holder of record of a Company Warrant that was
assumed by the Acquiror pursuant to Section 2.11(a)
a letter of transmittal (which shall specify that delivery shall
be effected, and risk of loss and title to the Company Warrant
shall pass, only upon proper delivery of the Company Warrant to
the Paying Agent and shall be in such form and have such other
provisions as the Acquiror may reasonably specify), and
(ii) instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the
Company Warrants in exchange for the issuance of Acquiror
Warrants. Acquiror will give the Company a reasonable
opportunity to review and comment on such letter of transmittal
and the Acquiror shall give due consideration to such comments
thereon that are reasonably and timely proposed by the Company.
Upon surrender of a Company Warrant for cancellation to the
Paying Agent or such other agent or agents as may be appointed
by the Acquiror, together with such letter of transmittal duly
completed and validly executed in accordance with the
instructions thereto, the holder of such Company Warrant shall
be entitled to receive in
A-16
exchange therefor (as soon as reasonably practicable), a an
Acquiror Warrant, and such Company Warrant shall, upon such
surrender, be cancelled. If payment in respect of any Company
Warrant is to be made to a Person other than the Person in whose
name such Company Warrant is registered, it shall be a condition
of exchange that the Company Warrant so surrendered shall be
properly endorsed or shall otherwise be in proper form for
transfer, that the signatures on such Company Warrant or any
related stock power shall be properly guaranteed and that the
Person requesting such payment shall have established to the
satisfaction of the Acquiror and the Paying Agent that any
transfer and other Taxes required by reason of such payment to a
Person other than the registered holder of such Company Warrant
have been paid or are not applicable. Until surrendered in
accordance with the provisions of this
Section 2.12(c), any Company Warrant shall be
deemed, at any time after the Effective Time, to represent only
the right to receive an Acquiror Warrant as contemplated by this
Section 2.12(c). No Acquiror Warrant shall be issued
to the holder of any Company Warrant until the holder of record
of such Company Warrant shall have surrendered such Company
Warrant and the letter of transmittal, duly completed and
validly executed in accordance with the instructions thereto,
and any other required documents. Any Acquiror Warrant issued
upon conversion of a Company Warrant in accordance with the
terms of this Article II shall be deemed to have
been paid in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such
Company Warrant. From and after the Effective Time, the holders
of a Company Warrant shall cease to have any rights with respect
to the Company Warrant or the shares of Company Common Stock
exercisable thereunder.
(d) At the Effective Time, the stock transfer books of the
Company shall be closed and there shall be no further
registration of transfers of any shares of capital stock,
Company Shares or Company Warrants thereafter on the records of
the Company. If, after the Effective Time, a Certificate (other
than representing shares of Company Common Stock described in
Sections 2.8(a)(iii) and (v)) is presented to
the Acquiror, the Interim Surviving Corporation or the Final
Surviving Entity, it shall be cancelled and exchanged as
provided in this Section 2.12.
(e) With the agreement of Acquiror, the Company and the
Transfer Agent, any or all of the shares of Acquiror Common
Stock and Acquiror Warrants issued as Merger Consideration or
upon the exchange of the Company Warrants in accordance with the
terms of this Article II may be issued by
certificates or agreements in definitive form or global form,
and delivered or registered in book-entry to an account of the
holders of Company Shares or Company Warrants, as applicable.
(f) All Merger Consideration paid upon conversion of the
Company Shares in accordance with the terms of this
Article II shall be deemed to have been paid in full
satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such Company Shares.
From and after the Effective Time, the holders of Certificates
shall cease to have any rights with respect to the shares of
Company Common Stock represented thereby, except for any
dissenters or appraisal right they may have under applicable Law.
(g) If any Certificate or Company Warrant shall have been
lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of
that fact by the holder thereof, the Acquiror shall pay or cause
to be paid in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed
Certificate or Company Warrant the applicable portion of the
Merger Consideration or Acquiror Warrants, as the case may be,
payable pursuant to Section 2.12 in respect of the
Company Shares or Company Warrants represented thereby;
provided, however, that Acquiror may, in its
discretion, and as a condition precedent to any payment, require
the Person who is the holder of record of such lost, stolen or
destroyed Certificate or Company Warrant to provide an
indemnification agreement in a form and substance acceptable to
Acquiror (and, if determined by the Acquiror in good faith to be
necessary, also require the Person to deliver a bond in such
amount as Acquiror may direct), against any claim that may be
made against Acquiror, the Interim Surviving Corporation, the
Final Surviving Entity or the Paying Agent with respect to the
Certificates or Company Warrant alleged to have been lost,
stolen or destroyed.
(h) Promptly following the date that is six (6) months
after the Effective Time, the Acquiror shall be entitled to
require the Paying Agent to deliver to it any funds, shares of
Acquiror Common Stock and Acquiror Warrants (including any
interest or other income received with respect thereto) that had
been made available to the Paying Agent and that have not been
disbursed to holders of Certificates or Company Warrants, or any
Certificates or other documents relating to the First-Step
Merger in its possession, and thereafter such holders shall be
entitled to look to the Acquiror only as general creditors
thereof with respect to any portion of the Merger Consideration
or Acquiror Warrants, as the case may be, payable upon due
surrender of their Certificates or Company Warrants, without
A-17
interest. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Section 2.12, to the fullest extent permitted by
Law, none of the Paying Agent, the Acquiror, the Interim
Surviving Corporation or the Final Surviving Entity shall be
liable to any holder of a Certificate or Company Warrants for
any amount properly delivered to a public official pursuant to
any applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar Law.
(i) To the extent that any Company Shareholder has
outstanding loans from the Company as of the Effective Time, the
cash portion of the Merger Consideration payable pursuant to
this Section 2.12 to such Company Shareholder shall
be reduced, to the extent available, by an amount equal to the
sum of the outstanding principal plus any accrued but unpaid
interest of such Company Shareholders loans as of the
Effective Time. Any such loan shall be deemed fully satisfied as
to the amount by which the Merger Consideration is reduced
pursuant to this Section 2.12(i). To the extent that
any Merger Consideration otherwise payable to such Company
Shareholder is so reduced, such amount shall be treated for all
purposes as having been paid to such Company Shareholder.
Section 2.13 Lock-Up.
(a) Except as otherwise provided for herein or in the
Stockholder Agreement, each Company Shareholder will be
prohibited during the period commencing on the Closing Date and
ending on date of the nine (9) month anniversary of Closing
Date (the
Lock-Up
Period,) from directly or indirectly:
(i) offering, pledging, selling or contracting to sell any
shares of Acquiror Common Stock or Acquiror Warrants;
(ii) offering, pledging, selling or contracting to sell any
option or contracting to purchase any shares of Acquiror Common
Stock or Acquiror Warrants; (iii) contracting to purchase
or purchasing any option or contracting to sell any shares of
Acquiror Common Stock or Acquiror Warrants; (iv) granting
any option, right or warrant for the sale of any shares of
Acquiror Common Stock or Acquiror Warrants; (v) lending or
otherwise disposing of or transferring (or entering into any
transaction or device designed to, or that could be expected to,
result in the disposition by any person at any time in the
future of) any shares of Acquiror Common Stock, Acquiror
Warrants or securities convertible into or exercisable or
exchangeable for shares of Acquiror Common Stock or Acquiror
Warrants; or (vi) entering into a swap or other derivatives
transaction or agreement that transfers, in whole or in part
(directly or indirectly), the economic consequences of ownership
of any shares of Acquiror Common Stock, whether any such swap or
transaction described in clauses (i) through (vi) is
to be settled by delivery of shares of Acquiror Common Stock,
Acquiror Warrants or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or
(vii) announcing his, her or its intention to do any of the
foregoing (any of the transactions described in clauses (i)
through (vii), a Common Stock Transaction);
provided, that, subject to any other applicable
restrictions, during the period commencing on the day after the
six (6) month anniversary of Closing Date and ending on
date of the nine (9) month anniversary of Closing Date, a
Company Stockholder may enter into a Common Stock Transaction
with respect to up to 50% of the shares of Acquiror Common Stock
received by such Company Shareholder pursuant to
Section 2.8 hereof.
(b) For the avoidance of doubt, nothing contained in
Section 2.13(a) shall prevent a Company Shareholder
from, or restrict the ability of a Company Shareholder to,
(i) purchase Acquiror Common Stock or other securities of
the Acquiror (ii) exercise any options or other convertible
securities granted under the Acquiror incentive plans or
(iii) dispose of Acquiror Common Stock which it
beneficially owns (as such concept is defined pursuant to
Rule 13d-3
of the Exchange Act) in connection with a transaction in which
all other holders of the Acquiror Common Stock are entitled to
receive the same consideration for their shares of Acquiror
Common Stock as would be received by the Company Shareholder.
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Company Shareholder
shall be permitted to transfer shares of Acquiror Common Stock
during the
Lock-Up
Period (i) as a bona fide gift or gifts, (ii) to any
trust for the direct or indirect benefit of such Company
Shareholder or the immediate family of such Company Shareholder,
(iii) by will or intestate succession, provided
that, in each case, (a) each transferee (or trustee, as
applicable) execute a
lock-up
agreement with the terms of this Section 2.13
pursuant to which these persons agree not to sell or transfer
the shares of Acquiror Common Stock for the remainder of the
Lock-Up
Period and (b) any such transfer shall not involve a
disposition for value. For purposes of this
Section 2.13, immediate family shall
mean any relationship by blood, marriage or adoption, not more
remote than first cousin.
(d) Restrictive Legend. Each certificate
representing Acquiror Common Stock and any other securities
issued upon any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization,
merger, consolidation or similar event, shall be stamped or
A-18
otherwise imprinted with legends in the following form (in
addition to any other legends required under applicable
securities Laws):
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE
TRANSFERRED ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CERTAIN TERMS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF AN AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER GOVERNING THE
SHARES ACQUIRED BY THE STOCKHOLDER FROM THE COMPANY, A COPY OF
WHICH IS ON FILE WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY.
(e) In furtherance of the foregoing, the Acquiror, and any
duly appointed transfer agent for the registration or transfer
of the shares of Acquiror Common Stock, are hereby authorized to
decline to make any transfer of the shares of Acquiror Common
Stock if such transfer would constitute a violation or breach of
this Section 2.13.
Section 2.14 Company
Transaction Expenses. Within five
(5) Business Days prior to the Closing Date, the Company
will provide to the Acquiror an itemized schedule (the
Schedule of Expenses) containing
(i) a true and complete list of all Company Transaction
Expenses that have been paid (or for which invoices have been
received) or will be due and payable that have been paid as of
the Closing Date, (ii) a good faith estimate of all such
additional Company Transaction Expenses that have been incurred
or are reasonably expected to be incurred as of the Closing Date
but are not reflected in clause (i) hereof, and
(iii) a good faith estimate of any additional Company
Transaction Expenses that are reasonably expected to be incurred
after the Closing Date, together with a certificate of an
authorized officer of the Company certifying the accuracy and
completeness of the Schedule of Expenses. The Schedule of
Expenses shall include any and all fees and expenses of
Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP,
Imperial Capital, LLC, and Squar, Milner, Peterson,
Miranda & Williamson, LLP for services rendered on or
prior to the Closing Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except
for transaction related services of a type normally provided
after the Closing Date by legal counsel and accountants, the
Company shall not incur or bind itself to incur any Company
Transaction Expenses after the Closing Date without the prior
written consent of the Acquiror. On or before the Closing Date,
the Company shall have made payment of each Company Transaction
Expense set forth in the Schedule of Expenses that are due and
payable prior to the Closing Date. The Company shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to not incur Company Transaction
Expenses in the aggregate in excess of $600,000 and will provide
prompt written notice to the Acquiror in the event that the
aggregate Company Transaction Expenses are reasonably expected
to exceed $600,000; provided, however, that
nothing herein shall be deemed to limit the Companys right
to incur Company Transaction Expenses the Company deems
reasonably necessary.
Section 2.15 Taxes
and Withholding. Merger Consideration shall
only be paid to the record holders of Company Shares outstanding
as of the Effective Time. The Company authorizes the Acquiror
and the Paying Agent to deduct and withhold from the Merger
Consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this Agreement to
any holder or former holder of shares of Company Common Stock, a
Company Option or a Company Warrant or from the amount paid to
any Dissenting Shareholder, such amounts as the Company,
Acquiror or the Paying Agent is required to deduct and withhold
with respect to the making of such payment or under any
provision of applicable Law. To the extent that amounts are so
deducted or withheld, such amounts shall be treated for all
purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder of
the shares of Company Common Stock in respect of which such
deduction and withholding was made. Any such withholding shall
be satisfied first from the amount of the cash portion of the
Merger Consideration and, to the extent the amount of required
withholding exceeds the cash portion of the Merger
Consideration, from the stock portion of the Merger
Consideration.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES
OF THE
COMPANY
Except as set forth in the corresponding sections or subsections
of the Company Disclosure Schedules attached hereto
(collectively, the Company Disclosure
Schedules) (each of which shall qualify only the
specifically identified section or subsection of this
Article III to which such Company Disclosure Schedules
relates and any other section or subsection of this
Article III to the extent that it is reasonably apparent
from a reading of the face of the disclosure (without having to
refer to the underlying documents being disclosed) that such
disclosure is relevant
A-19
and applicable to such other section and subsection), the
Company hereby represents and warrants to the Acquiror,
First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub as of the date
hereof, on and as of the Closing Date, as though made at the
Closing Date and on and as of the Effective Time, as though made
at the Effective Time, as follows:
Section 3.1 Organization
and Qualification.
(a) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is (i) a
corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation
as set forth in Schedule 3.1(a)(i) of the Company
Disclosure Schedules, and has full corporate power and
authority to own, lease and operate its properties and to carry
on its business as it is now being conducted and currently
contemplated to be conducted and (ii) duly qualified or
licensed as a foreign corporation to do business, and is in good
standing, in each jurisdiction where the character of the
properties owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of its
business makes such qualification or licensing necessary, except
for any such failures to be so qualified or licensed and in good
standing that, individually or in the aggregate, have not had
and would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. Schedule 3.1(a)(ii) of the Company
Disclosure Schedules lists every state or foreign
jurisdiction in which the Company has employees or facilities or
otherwise conducts its business.
(b) The Company has heretofore furnished to the Acquiror a
complete and correct copy of the articles of incorporation and
bylaws or equivalent organizational documents, each as amended
to date, of the Company and each of its Subsidiaries. Such
articles of incorporation, bylaws or equivalent organizational
documents are in full force and effect. Neither the Company nor
any of its Subsidiaries is in violation of any of the provisions
of its articles of incorporation, bylaws or equivalent
organizational documents. The Company Board has not approved or
proposed any amendment to any of the articles of incorporation
and bylaws or equivalent organizational documents of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries. The Company has heretofore made
available to the Acquiror a complete and correct copies of the
transfer books and minute books of each of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, which contain complete and accurate records of all
actions taken, and summaries of all meetings held by the Company
Shareholders and the Company Board (and any committees thereof)
since the time of incorporation of the Company. At the Closing,
the minute books of the Company and each of its Subsidiaries
will be in the possession of the Company.
(c) Schedule 3.1(c) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules lists the directors and officers of the Company as
of the date hereof, separately noting which of such directors
and officers has any rights to indemnification from the Company
and the scope and duration of such rights, and also separately
lists any other Person with rights to indemnification from the
Company. The operations now being conducted by the Company are
not now and have never been conducted by the Company under any
other name.
Section 3.2 Authority.
(a) The Company has full corporate power and authority to
execute and deliver this Agreement and each of the Ancillary
Agreements to which it will be a party and, subject to obtaining
approval of Company Shareholders representing a majority of the
outstanding shares of Company Common Stock (Company
Shareholder Approval), to perform its obligations
hereunder and thereunder and to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby. The execution, delivery and
performance by the Company of this Agreement and each of the
Ancillary Agreements to which the Company will be party and the
consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated
hereby and thereby have been duly and validly authorized by the
Company Board. No other corporate actions or proceedings on the
part of the Company are necessary to authorize the execution,
delivery or performance of this Agreement or any Ancillary
Agreement or, except for obtaining Company Shareholder Approval,
to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.
This Agreement has been, and upon their execution each of the
Ancillary Agreements to which the Company will be a party will
have been, duly executed and delivered by the Company. This
Agreement constitutes, and upon their execution each of the
Ancillary Agreements to which the Company will be a party will
constitute, the legal, valid and binding obligations of the
Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with
their respective terms, except as the same may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar
Law now or hereafter in effect relating to creditors
rights generally and subject to general principles of equity.
A-20
(b) The Company Board, at a meeting thereof duly called and
held on December 10, 2008 (i) determined that this
Agreement and the Merger are advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of the Company and the Company Shareholders,
(ii) approved this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements
to which the Company will be party, the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, and
(iii) resolved to recommend that the Company Shareholders
approve and adopt this Agreement and the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby.
(c) The Company Shareholder Approval is the only vote of
the holders of any class or series of the capital stock of the
Company necessary, under applicable Law or otherwise, to approve
and adopt this Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby to which the Company is a party.
Section 3.3 No
Conflict; Required Filings and Consents.
(a) The execution, delivery and performance by the Company
of this Agreement and each of the Ancillary Agreements to which
the Company is or will be a party, and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, assuming the
receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval, do not and will not:
(i) conflict with or violate the articles of incorporation
or bylaws or equivalent organizational documents of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries;
(ii) conflict with or violate any Law applicable to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or by which any property or
asset of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is bound or
affected; or
(iii) except as set forth on Schedule 3.3(a)(iii)
of the Company Disclosure Schedules result in any breach of,
constitute a default (or an event that, with notice or lapse of
time or both, would become a default) under, require any Consent
of or with any Person pursuant to, give to others any right of
termination, amendment, modification, acceleration or
cancellation of, allow the imposition of any fees or penalties,
require the offering or making of any payment or redemption,
give rise to any increased, guaranteed, accelerated or
additional rights or entitlements of any Person or otherwise
adversely affect any rights of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries under, or result in the creation of any Encumbrance
on any property, asset or right of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries pursuant to, any note, bond, mortgage, indenture,
agreement, lease, license, Permit, franchise, instrument,
obligation or other Contract or Law to which the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties, assets
or rights are bound or affected. Following the Effective Time,
the Interim Surviving Corporation and the Final Surviving Entity
will be permitted to exercise all of its rights under the
Contracts without the payment of any additional amounts or
consideration other than ongoing fees, royalties or payments
which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries would otherwise be
required to pay pursuant to the terms of such Contracts had the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement not occurred.
(b) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is
required to file, seek or obtain any Permit or Consent of or
with any Governmental Authority or any other Person in
connection with the execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement and each of the Ancillary Agreements to which the
Company is or will be a party or the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby or thereby or in order to
prevent the termination of any right, privilege, license or
qualification of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, except
for (i) the filing of the First-Step Merger Certificate of
Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of California
and (ii) such filings as may be required by any applicable
federal or state securities or blue sky Laws.
(c) No fair price, interested
shareholder, business combination or similar
provision of any state takeover Law is, or at the Effective Time
will be, applicable to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements.
Section 3.4 Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of
5,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock, of which
4,705,735 shares of Company Common Stock are issued and
outstanding. The Company Common Stock is held of record by the
Persons and in the amounts set forth in
Schedule 3.4(a)(i) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules, which further sets forth for each such Person the
number of shares held, class
and/or
series of such shares and the number of the applicable stock
certificate, if any, representing such shares and each such
Persons address.
A-21
Schedule 3.4(a)(ii) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth, for each Subsidiary of the Company,
the amount of its authorized capital stock, the amount of and
the record and beneficial owners of its outstanding capital
stock and any options, warrants or interests convertible into or
exchangeable or exercisable for the purchase of shares of
capital stock or other equity or ownership interests.
(b) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.4(a)(i)
and Schedule 3.4(a)(ii) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules, there are no, and neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries has issued or agreed to issue or is obligated
to issue any: (a) share of capital stock or other equity or
ownership interest; (b) option, warrant, call, right or
interest convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for the
purchase of shares of capital stock or other equity or ownership
interests; (c) stock appreciation right, phantom stock,
interest in the ownership or earnings of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or other equity equivalent or equity-based
award or right; or (d) bond, debenture or other
indebtedness having the right to vote or convertible or
exchangeable for securities having the right to vote.
(c) Each outstanding share of capital stock or other equity
or ownership interest of the Company and each of its
Subsidiaries is duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable, and in the case of its Subsidiaries, each such
share or other equity or ownership interest is owned by the
Company or another Subsidiary, free and clear of any and all
Encumbrances. All of the aforesaid shares or other equity or
ownership interests have been offered, sold and delivered or
repurchased (in the case of shares that were outstanding and
repurchased by the Company or any Company Shareholder) by the
Company or a Subsidiary in full compliance with all applicable
federal and state securities Laws. Except as set forth in
Schedule 3.4(c) of the Company Disclosure Schedules
and, except for rights granted to the Acquiror, First-Step
Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub under this Agreement and
the Ancillary Agreements, there are no outstanding obligations
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to issue, sell or
transfer or repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, or that
relate to the holding, voting or disposition of, or that
restrict the transfer of, the issued or unissued capital stock
or other equity or ownership interests of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries. No shares of capital stock or other equity or
ownership interests of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
have been issued, transferred or repurchased (in the case of
shares that were outstanding and repurchased by the Company or
any Company Shareholder) in violation of any rights, agreements,
arrangements or commitments under any provision of applicable
Law, the articles of incorporation or bylaws or equivalent
organizational documents of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or any Contract to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party or by which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is bound.
(d) The Company has not, and will not have, suffered or
incurred any liability (contingent or otherwise) or claim, loss,
liability, damage, deficiency, cost or expense (other than
reasonable and customary transactional costs and expenses)
relating to or arising out of the issuance or repurchase of any
Company Common Stock or options or warrants to purchase Company
Common Stock, or out of any agreements or arrangements relating
thereto (including any amendment of the terms of any such
agreement or arrangement). There are no declared or accrued but
unpaid dividends with respect to any shares of Company Common
Stock. Other than the Company Common Stock set forth on
Schedule 3.4(a)(i) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules, the Company has no other capital stock
authorized, issued or outstanding.
(e) As of the date hereof, the Company has no outstanding
shares that are unvested or are subject to termination or a
repurchase option, substantial risk of forfeiture or other
similar condition (in each case giving effect to any
acceleration of vesting or lapse of such option, risk or
condition due to the consummation of the Mergers and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any of the
Ancillary Agreements) under any applicable restricted stock
purchase agreement or other similar agreement with the Company.
(f) Except for the Company Option Plans, the Company has
never adopted, sponsored or maintained any stock option plan or
any other plan or agreement providing for equity compensation to
any person. The Company has reserved One Hundred Thousand
(100,000) shares of Company Common Stock for issuance to
employees and directors of, and consultants to, the Company upon
the issuance of stock or the exercise of options granted under
the Company Option Plans, of which (i) 75,000 shares
are issuable, as of the date hereof, upon the exercise of
outstanding, unexercised options granted under the Company
Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated May 6, 1998,
(ii) 15,000 shares have been issued upon the exercise
of options under the Company Option Plans and remain outstanding
as of the date hereof and (iii) 10,000 shares remain
available for future grant. Schedule 3.2(f) of the
Company Disclosure Schedules sets forth for each outstanding
Company Option and Company Warrant, the name
A-22
of the holder of such option or warrant, the type of entity of
such holder, and any ultimate parent entity of such holder, if
not an individual, the domicile address of such holder, the
number of shares of Company Common Stock issuable upon the
exercise of such option or warrant, the exercise price of such
option or warrant, the date of grant of such option or warrant,
the vesting schedule for such option or warrant, including the
extent vested to date and whether the vesting of such option or
warrant is subject to acceleration as a result of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any other events
(including a complete description of any such acceleration
provisions), and whether such option is a nonstatutory option or
intended to qualify as an incentive stock option as defined in
Section 422 of the Tax Code. The terms of the Company
Option Plans and the applicable agreements for each Company
Option permit the termination of the Company Options and the
Company Option Plans as provided in this Agreement, without the
Consent or approval of the holders of such securities, the
Company Shareholders or otherwise and without any acceleration
of the exercise schedules or vesting provisions in effect for
such Company Options. True and complete copies of all agreements
and instruments relating to or issued under the Company Option
Plans have been provided to the Acquiror, and such agreements
and instruments have not been amended, modified or supplemented,
and there are no agreements to amend, modify or supplement such
agreements or instruments from the forms thereof provided to the
Acquiror. All holders of Company Options are current employees
of the Company.
(g) There are no outstanding loans by the Company or any
Subsidiary to any Company Shareholder.
(h) Except for the Company Options and Company Warrants,
there are no options, warrants, calls, rights, convertible
securities, commitments or agreements of any character, written
or oral, to which the Company is a party or by which the Company
is bound obligating the Company to issue, deliver, sell,
repurchase or redeem, or cause to be issued, delivered, sold,
repurchased or redeemed, any shares of the capital stock of the
Company or obligating the Company to grant, extend, accelerate
the vesting of, change the price of, otherwise amend or enter
into any such option, warrant, call, right, commitment or
agreement. There are no outstanding or authorized stock
appreciation, phantom stock, profit participation, or other
similar rights with respect to the Company. Except as
contemplated hereby, there are no voting trusts, proxies, or
other agreements or understandings with respect to the voting
stock of the Company. There are no agreements to which the
Company is a party relating to the registration, sale or
transfer (including agreements relating to rights of first
refusal, co sale rights or drag-along rights) of any
Company Common Stock. As a result of the Merger, the Acquiror
will be the sole record and beneficial holder of all issued and
outstanding Company Common Stock and all rights to acquire or
receive any shares of Company Common Stock, whether or not such
shares of Company Common Stock are outstanding.
(i) The information contained in the Spreadsheet will be
true and correct as of the Closing Date and the allocation of
the Merger Consideration as set forth in the Spreadsheet will be
consistent with the organizational documents of the Company and
any applicable Contract.
Section 3.5 Equity
Interests. Schedule 3.5 of the
Company Disclosure Schedules lists each Subsidiary of the
Company as of the date hereof. Except for the Subsidiaries
listed in Schedule 3.5 of the Company Disclosure
Schedules, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries
directly or indirectly owns any equity, partnership, membership
or similar interest in, or any interest convertible into,
exercisable for the purchase of or exchangeable for any such
equity, partnership, membership or similar interest, or is under
any current or prospective obligation to form or participate in,
provide funds to, make any loan, capital contribution or other
investment in, or assume any liability or obligation of, any
Person.
Section 3.6 Financial
Statements; No Undisclosed Liabilities.
(a) True and complete copies of the audited balance sheet
of the Company as at November 30, 2007, and the related
audited statements of income, shareholders equity and cash
flows of the Company, together with all related notes and
schedules thereto, accompanied by the reports thereon of the
Companys independent auditors (the 2007 Financial
Statements are attached hereto as
Schedule 3.6(a)(i) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules, and, as soon as they are available, the Company
will provide Acquiror with true and complete copies of the
audited balance sheet of the Company as at November 30,
2008, and the related audited statements of income,
shareholders equity and cash flows of the Company,
together with all related notes and schedules thereto,
accompanied by the reports thereon of the Companys
independent auditors (the 2008 Financial
Statements and, collectively with the 2007 Financial
Statements, the Financial Statements). True
and complete copies of the unaudited balance sheet of the
A-23
Company as at August 31, 2008 and the related unaudited
statements of income of the Company (collectively referred to as
the Interim Financial Statements), are
attached hereto as Schedule 3.6(a)(ii) of the Company
Disclosure Schedules. True and complete copies of the
unaudited balance sheets of each of the Subsidiaries as at
August 31, 2008 and the related unaudited statements of
income (collectively referred to as the Interim
Subsidiary Financial Statements) are attached hereto
as Schedule 3.6(a)(iii) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules, and, as soon as they are available, the Company
will provide Acquiror with true and complete copies of the
audited balance sheet of the Subsidiaries as at
November 30, 2008, and the related audited statements of
income, shareholders equity and cash flows of the
Subsidiaries, together with all related notes and schedules
thereto, accompanied by the reports thereon of the
Subsidiaries independent auditors (the 2008
Subsidiary Financial Statements.
(b) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.6(b) of the
Company Disclosure Schedules, each of the Financial
Statements, the Interim Financial Statements, the Interim
Subsidiary Financial Statements and the 2008 Subsidiary
Financial Statements (i) are (or in the case of the 2008
Financial Statements and the 2008 Subsidiary Financial
Statements, when delivered will be) correct and complete and
have been prepared in accordance with the books and records of
the Company and its Subsidiaries, as the case may be;
(ii) have been (or in the case of the 2008 Financial
Statements and the 2008 Subsidiary Financial Statements, when
delivered will be) prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a
consistent basis throughout the periods indicated and consistent
with each other (except as may be indicated in the notes
thereto); and (iii) fairly present, in all material
respects, the financial position, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as the case may be,
as at the respective dates thereof and for the respective
periods indicated therein, except as otherwise noted therein and
subject, in the case of the Interim Financial Statements and
Interim Subsidiary Financial Statements, to normal and recurring
year-end adjustments that will not, individually or in the
aggregate, be material and the absence of notes (which, if
presented, would not differ materially from those included in
the Company Balance Sheet or the Subsidiary Balance Sheet).
(c) Except as and to the extent adequately accrued or
reserved against in the audited balance sheet of the Company as
at November 30, 2007 (such balance sheet, together with all
related notes and schedules thereto, the Company
Balance Sheet), the Company does not have any
liability, indebtedness, expense, claim, deficiency, guaranty or
obligation of any type or nature, whether accrued, absolute,
contingent, matured, unmatured or otherwise, whether known or
unknown and whether or not required by GAAP to be reflected in a
balance sheet of the Company or disclosed in the notes thereto,
except for (i) liabilities and obligations, incurred in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice since
the date of the Company Balance Sheet, that are not,
individually or in the aggregate, material in amount,
(ii) liabilities for performance under Company Material
Contracts that do not exceed $50,000 individually or $100,000 in
the aggregate, and (iii) liabilities described in
Schedule 3.6(c)(iii) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules. Except as and to the extent adequately accrued or
reserved against in the unaudited balance sheet of the
Subsidiaries as at August 31, 2008 (such balance sheet,
together with all related notes and schedules thereto, the
Subsidiary Balance Sheet), the Subsidiaries
do not have any liability, indebtedness, expense, claim,
deficiency, guaranty or obligation of any type or nature,
whether accrued, absolute, contingent, matured, unmatured or
otherwise, whether known or unknown and whether or not required
by GAAP to be reflected in a consolidated balance sheet of the
Subsidiaries or disclosed in the notes thereto, except for
(A) liabilities and obligations, incurred in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice since the date
of the Subsidiary Balance Sheet, that are not, individually or
in the aggregate, material in amount, (B) liabilities for
performance under material Contracts of the Subsidiaries that do
not exceed $50,000 individually or $100,000 in the aggregate,
and (C) liabilities described in Schedule 3.6(c)(C)
of the Company Disclosure Schedules.
(d) The books of account and financial records of the
Company and its Subsidiaries are true and correct and have been
prepared and are maintained in accordance with sound accounting
practice.
Section 3.7 [Intentionally
Deleted].
Section 3.8 Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. Since the date
of the Company Balance Sheet: (a) the Company and its
Subsidiaries have conducted their businesses only in the
ordinary course consistent with past practice; (b) there
has not been any change, event or development that, individually
or in the aggregate, has had or is reasonably expected to have
or result in a Company Material Adverse Effect; and
(c) neither the Company nor any
A-24
of its Subsidiaries has suffered any material loss, damage,
destruction or other casualty affecting any of its properties or
assets, whether or not covered by insurance.
Section 3.9 Accounts
Receivable.
(a) The Company has made available to the Acquiror a list
of all accounts receivable, whether billed or unbilled, of the
Company as of the date of the Company Balance Sheet, together
with an aging schedule (of only billed accounts receivable)
indicating a range of days elapsed since invoice.
(b) All of the accounts receivable, whether billed or
unbilled, of the Company arose in the ordinary course of
business, are carried at values determined in accordance with
GAAP consistently applied, are not subject to any set-off or
counterclaim, do not represent obligations for goods sold on
consignment, on approval or on a sale-or-return basis or subject
to any other repurchase or return arrangement and are
collectible except to the extent of reserves therefor set forth
in the Company Balance Sheet. No Person has any Lien on any
accounts receivable of the Company and no written request or
Contract for deduction or discount has been made with respect to
any accounts receivable of the Company.
Section 3.10 Compliance
with Law; Permits.
(a) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is and has
been in compliance with all Laws applicable to it. None of the
Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of its or their
executive officers has received during the past five
(5) years, nor is there any basis for, any notice, order,
complaint or other communication from any Governmental Authority
or any other Person that the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
is not in compliance with any Law applicable to it.
(b) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is in
possession of all Permits. Each of the Company and its
Subsidiaries is and has been in material compliance with all
such Permits and all such Permits are in full force and effect.
No suspension, cancellation, modification, revocation or
nonrenewal of any Permit is pending or, to the knowledge of the
Company, threatened. The Interim Surviving Corporation or the
Final Surviving Entity, as the case may be, and its Subsidiaries
will continue to have the use and benefit of all Permits
immediately following consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby. No Permit is held in the name of any
Employee, officer, director, shareholder, agent or otherwise on
behalf of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
Section 3.11 Export
Control Laws. Each of the Company and its
Subsidiaries have at all times conducted their export
transactions in accordance with (1) all applicable
U.S. export and re-export controls, including the United
States Export Administration Act and Regulations and Foreign
Assets Control Regulations and (2) all other applicable
import/export controls in other countries in which the Company
or any Subsidiary conducts business. Without limiting the
foregoing:
(a) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries have obtained
all export licenses, license exceptions, Permits and other
Consents and classifications with any Governmental Entity
required for (i) the export and re-export of products,
services, software and technologies and (ii) releases of
technologies and software to foreign nationals located in the
United States and abroad (Export Approvals);
(b) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is in
compliance with the terms of all applicable Export Approvals;
(c) There are no pending or, to the Companys
knowledge, threatened claims against the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries with respect to such Export Approvals;
(d) To the Companys knowledge, there are no Actions,
conditions or circumstances pertaining to the Companys or
any of its Subsidiaries export transactions that may give
rise to any future claims; and
(e) No Export Approvals for the transfer of export licenses
to the Acquiror, the Interim Surviving Corporation or the Final
Surviving Entity are required, or such Export Approvals can be
obtained expeditiously without material cost.
(f) Schedule 3.11(f) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth the true, complete and accurate export
control classifications applicable to the Companys
products, services, software and technologies.
A-25
Section 3.12 Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act. Neither the Company,
nor any of its Subsidiaries (including any of its
Representatives or other Person associated with or acting on
their behalf) has, directly or indirectly, taken any action
which would cause it to be in violation of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any rules or regulations
thereunder (the FCPA), used any
corporate funds for unlawful contributions, gifts, entertainment
or other unlawful expenses relating to political activity, made,
offered or authorized any unlawful payment to foreign or
domestic government officials or employees, whether directly or
indirectly, or made, offered or authorized any bribe, rebate,
payoff, influence payment, kickback or other similar unlawful
payment, whether directly or indirectly. The Company and its
Subsidiaries have established sufficient internal controls and
procedures to ensure compliance with the FCPA and has provided
the Acquiror with all of such documentation.
Section 3.13 Litigation. There
is no Action pending or, to the knowledge of the Company,
threatened against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, any
of its officers or directors or any property or asset of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, nor is there any basis for
any such Action. There is no Action pending or, to the knowledge
of the Company, threatened seeking to prevent, hinder, modify,
delay or challenge the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements. There is no outstanding
order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or
award of, or pending or, to the knowledge of the Company,
threatened investigation by, any Governmental Authority relating
to the Company, any of its Subsidiaries, any of their respective
officers, directors, properties or assets or the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements.
There is no Action by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
pending, or which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has
commenced preparations to initiate, against any other Person. No
Governmental Entity has at any time challenged or questioned the
legal right of the Company to conduct its operations as
presently or previously conducted or as currently contemplated
to be conducted.
Section 3.14 Employee
Benefit Plans.
(a) Schedule 3.14(a) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth a true and complete list of:
(i) all employee benefit plans (as defined in
Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, as amended (ERISA)), whether or not
subject to ERISA, and all bonus, incentive compensation, stock
option, stock purchase, restricted stock, incentive, deferred
compensation, pension, profit sharing, savings, retiree medical
or life insurance, medical, dental, disability, accident or life
insurance, supplemental retirement, employment, consulting,
severance, termination pay, retention, change in control or
other benefit plans, programs, practices, policies, agreements,
Contracts or arrangements, to which the Company or any of its
ERISA Affiliates is a party, with respect to which the Company
or any of its ERISA Affiliates has or could have any liability
or obligation (whether contingent or otherwise) or which are
maintained, contributed to, required to be contributed to or
sponsored by the Company or any of its ERISA Affiliates;
(ii) each employee benefit plan for which the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries could incur liability under
Section 4069 of ERISA in the event such plan has been or
were to be terminated;
(iii) any plan in respect of which the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries could incur liability under
Section 4212(c) of ERISA; and
(iv) any Contracts between the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries and any Employee, officer or director of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, including any Contracts
relating in any way to a sale of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries ((i) through (iv) collectively, the
Plans).
(b) Each Plan referred to in Section 3.14(a) is
in writing. The Company has furnished to the Acquiror a true and
complete copy of each Plan and has delivered to the Acquiror a
true and complete copy of each material document, if any,
prepared in connection with each Plan, including (i) a copy
of each trust or other funding arrangement, (ii) each
summary plan description and summary of material modifications,
(iii) the two most recently filed Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) Form 5500, (iv) the most
recently received IRS determination letter for each such Plan
and the application materials submitted in connection with such
determination letter and (v) the most recently prepared
actuarial report and financial statement in connection with each
such Plan. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
any express or implied commitment (A) to create, incur
liability with respect to or cause to exist any other employee
benefit plan, program or arrangement, (B) to enter into any
Contract to provide
A-26
compensation or benefits to any individual or (C) to
modify, change or terminate any Plan, other than with respect to
a modification, change or termination required by ERISA or the
Tax Code.
(c) At no time has the Company or any ERISA Affiliate
contributed to or been obligated to contribute to, any
multiemployer plan within the meaning of Section 3(37) or
4001(a)(3) of ERISA (a Multiemployer Plan)
any single employer pension plan within the meaning of
Section 4001(a)(15) of ERISA for which the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries could incur liability under
Section 4063 or 4064 of ERISA (a Multiple Employer
Plan) or any other employee benefit plan that is
subject to Title IV or Section 302 of ERISA or
Section 412 of the Tax Code. None of the Plans:
(i) provides for the payment of separation, severance,
termination or similar-type benefits to any person;
(ii) obligates the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to
pay separation, severance, termination or similar-type benefits
solely or partially as a result of the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements; or
(iii) obligates the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to
make any payment or provide any benefit as a result of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the Ancillary
Agreements. There are no Plans that provides for or promises
medical, disability or life insurance benefits to any current or
former Employee, officer or director of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries beyond their retirement or other termination of
service, other than coverage mandated by the Section 4980B
of the Code or any similar state or local Laws. Each of the
Plans is maintained in the United States and is subject only to
the Laws of the United States or a political subdivision thereof.
(d) Each Plan is now and always has been operated in all
respects in accordance with its terms and the requirements of
all applicable Laws, including ERISA and the Tax Code. Each of
the Company and its Subsidiaries has performed all obligations
required to be performed by it and is not in any respect in
default under or in violation under any Plan, nor does the
Company have any knowledge of any such default or violation by
any other party to any Plan. No Action is pending or, to the
knowledge of the Company, threatened with respect to any Plan,
other than claims for benefits in the ordinary course, and no
fact or event exists that would give rise to any such Action.
(e) Each Plan that is intended to be qualified under
Section 401(a) of the Tax Code or Section 401(k) of
the Tax Code is so qualified and has received a timely favorable
determination letter from the IRS covering all of the provisions
applicable to the Plan for which determination letters are
currently available that the Plan is so qualified. No fact or
event has occurred since the date of such determination letter
or letters from the IRS that could adversely affect the
qualified status of any such Plan.
(f) There has not been any non-exempt prohibited
transaction, within the meaning of Section 406 of ERISA or
Section 4975 of the Tax Code, with respect to any Plan.
With respect to any Plan, (i) neither the Company nor any
of its ERISA Affiliates has had asserted against it any claim
for taxes under Chapter 43 of Subtitle D of the Code and
Section 5000 of the Code, or for penalties under ERISA
Section 502(c), 502(i) or 502 (l), nor, to the knowledge of
the Company, is there a reasonable basis for any such claim, and
(ii) no officer, director or Employee of the Company has
committed a breach of any fiduciary responsibility or obligation
imposed by Title I of ERISA. Neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries has incurred any liability under, arising out
of or by operation of Title IV of ERISA, other than
liability for premiums to the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (the PBGC) arising in the
ordinary course, including any liability in connection with
(i) the termination or reorganization of any employee
benefit plan subject to Title IV of ERISA or (ii) the
withdrawal from any Multiemployer Plan or Multiple Employer
Plan, and no fact or event exists that would give rise to any
such liability.
(g) All contributions, premiums or payments required to be
made with respect to any Plan have been made on or before their
due dates. All such contributions have been fully deducted for
income tax purposes. No such deduction has been challenged or
disallowed by any Governmental Authority and no fact or event
exists that would give rise to any such challenge or
disallowance.
(h) There are no Actions, (other than routine claims for
benefits) pending or, to the knowledge of the Company,
threatened, anticipated or expected to be asserted with respect
to any Plan or any related trust or other funding medium
thereunder or with respect to the Company or any ERISA Affiliate
as the sponsor or fiduciary thereof or with respect to any other
fiduciary thereof.
(i) No Plan or any related trust or other funding medium
thereunder or any fiduciary thereof is, to the knowledge of the
Company, the subject of an audit, investigation or examination
by any Governmental Authority.
A-27
(j) With respect to each Plan that is subject to
Title IV or Section 302 of ERISA or Section 412
or 4971 of the Tax Code, as of the date hereof: (i) there
does not exist any accumulated funding deficiency within the
meaning of Section 412 of the Code or Section 302 of
ERISA, (ii) no reportable event within the meaning of
Section 4043(c) of ERISA for which the
30-day
notice requirement has not been waived has occurred,
(iii) all premiums to the PBGC have been timely paid in
full, (iv) the PBGC has not instituted proceedings to
terminate any such Plan, and (v) the funded status of such
Plan as reflected in the most recent actuarial report for such
Plan made available to Acquiror is accurate in all material
respects and such report fairly presents the funded status of
such Plan on the basis set forth therein.
(k) The Company and its ERISA Affiliates do not maintain
any Plan which is a group health plan, as such term
is defined in Section 5000(b)(1) of the Tax Code, that has
not been administered and operated in all respects in compliance
with the applicable requirements of Section 601 of ERISA,
Section 4980B(b) of the Tax Code and the applicable
provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1986. The Company is not subject to any
liability, including additional contributions, fines, penalties
or loss of tax deduction as a result of such administration and
operation.
(l) The consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement will not, either alone or in combination with
another event, (i) entitle any Employee to severance pay,
unemployment compensation or any other payment, except as
expressly provided in this Agreement, (ii) accelerate the
time of payment, vesting or funding, or increase the amount of
compensation due any such Employee, except as expressly provided
in this Agreement or (iii) cause or result in a limitation
on the right of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to amend,
merge, terminate or receive a reversion of assets from any
employee benefit plan or related trust. No amount paid or
payable by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in connection
with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, whether
alone or in combination with another event, will be an
excess parachute payment within the meaning of
Section 280G or Section 4999 of the Tax Code or will
not be deductible by the Company by reason of Section 280G
of the Tax Code.
(m) Each Plan that constitutes, in any part, a nonqualified
deferred compensation plan within the meaning of
Section 409A of the Tax Code has, since December 31,
2004, been operated and maintained, in all material respects, in
accordance with a good faith, reasonable interpretation of
Section 409A of the Tax Code, as determined under
applicable guidance of the Department of Treasury and the IRS.
Each outstanding Company Option: (i) has an exercise price
that has never been and may never be less than the fair market
value of the underlying shares as of the date such Company
Option was granted in accordance with all governing documents
and in compliance with all applicable Law and (ii) has no
feature for the deferral of compensation other than the deferral
of recognition of income until the later of exercise or
disposition of such Company Option.
(n) Each Plan can be amended or terminated at any time,
without Consent from any other party and without liability other
than for benefits accrued as of the date of such amendment or
termination (other than charges incurred as a result of such
termination).
Section 3.15 Labor
and Employment Matters.
(a) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to any labor or collective bargaining Contract that
pertains to Employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
There are no organizing activities or collective bargaining
arrangements that could affect the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries pending or under discussion with any labor
organization or group of Employees of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries. There is, and during the past five years there has
been, no labor dispute, strike, controversy, slowdown, work
stoppage or lockout pending or, to the knowledge of the Company,
threatened against or affecting the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, nor is there any basis for any of the foregoing.
Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has breached or
otherwise failed to comply with the provisions of any collective
bargaining or union Contract. There are no pending or, to the
knowledge of the Company, threatened union grievances or union
representation questions involving Employees of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries.
(b) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
engaged or is engaging in any unfair labor practice. No unfair
labor practice or labor charge or complaint is pending or, to
the knowledge of the Company, threatened with respect to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries before the National Labor
Relations Board, the Equal
A-28
Employment Opportunity Commission or any other Governmental
Authority. Neither Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
incurred any liability or obligation under the Worker Adjustment
and Retraining Notification Act or any similar state or local
Law which remains unsatisfied. During the past five
(5) years, neither Company nor any of its Subsidiaries are
or have been a party to any redundancy agreements (including
social plans or job protection plans).
(c) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries have withheld
and paid to the appropriate Governmental Authority or are
holding for payment not yet due to such Governmental Authority
all amounts required to be withheld from Employees of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries and are not liable for any
arrears of wages, taxes, penalties or other sums for failure to
comply with any applicable Laws relating to the employment of
labor. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries have paid in
full to all their respective Employees or adequately accrued in
accordance with GAAP for all wages, salaries, commissions,
bonuses, benefits and other compensation due to or on behalf of
such Employees. There are no material pending or, to the
knowledge of the Company, threatened or reasonably anticipated
Actions against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries under any
workers compensation policy or long-term disability policy.
(d) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to, or otherwise bound by, any consent decree with, or
citation by, any Governmental Authority relating to Employees or
employment practices. None of the Company, any of its
Subsidiaries or any of its or their executive officers has
received within the past five years any notice of intent by any
Governmental Authority responsible for the enforcement of labor
or employment Laws to conduct an investigation relating to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries and, to the knowledge of the
Company, no such investigation is in progress. To the knowledge
of the Company, no current Employee or officer of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries is expected, to terminate his employment
relationship with such entity following the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby.
(e) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries is in material
compliance with all applicable federal, state and local Laws,
rules and regulations respecting employment, employment
practices, terms and conditions of employment, employee safety
and health and wages and hours. The services provided by each of
the Companys and its Subsidiaries Employees are
terminable at the will of the Company and its Subsidiaries.
Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary reasonably anticipates
any direct or indirect material liability with respect to any
misclassification of any person as an independent contractor
rather than as an employee, or with respect to any individual
leased from another employer.
(f) To the knowledge of the Company, no Employee of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries is obligated under any
Contract or agreement or subject to any judgment, decree, or
order of any court or administrative agency that would interfere
in any material respect with such persons efforts to
promote the interests of the Company or that would interfere in
any material respect with the Companys business or the
ability of the Company to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 3.16 Title
to, Sufficiency and Condition of Assets.
(a) The Company and its Subsidiaries have good and valid
title to or a valid leasehold interest in all of their assets,
including all of the assets reflected on the Company Balance
Sheet and Subsidiary Balance Sheet or acquired in the ordinary
course of business since the date of the Company Balance Sheet,
except those sold or otherwise disposed of for fair value since
the date of the Company Balance Sheet in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice. The assets owned or
leased by the Company and its Subsidiaries constitute all of the
assets necessary for the Company and its Subsidiaries to carry
on their respective businesses as currently conducted. None of
the assets owned or leased by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is subject to any Encumbrance, other than
(i) liens for current taxes and assessments not yet past
due, (ii) mechanics, workmens,
repairmens, warehousemens and carriers liens
arising in the ordinary course of business of the Company or
such Subsidiary consistent with past practice and (iii) any
such matters of record, Encumbrances and other imperfections of
title that do not, individually or in the aggregate, impair the
continued ownership, use and operation of the assets to which
they relate in the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries
as currently conducted (collectively, Company Permitted
Encumbrances).
A-29
(b) All tangible assets owned or leased by the Company or
its Subsidiaries have been maintained in accordance with
generally accepted industry practice, are in good operating
condition and repair, ordinary wear and tear excepted, and are
adequate for the uses to which they are being put.
This Section 3.16 does not relate to real property
or interests in real property, such items being the subject of
Section 3.17, or to Intellectual Property, such
items being the subject of Section 3.18.
Section 3.17 Real
Property.
(a) Schedule 3.17(a) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth a true and complete list of all Owned
Real Property and all Leased Real Property. Each of the Company
and its Subsidiaries has (i) good and marketable title in
fee simple to all Owned Real Property and (ii) good and
marketable leasehold title to all Leased Real Property, in each
case, free and clear of all Encumbrances except Company
Permitted Encumbrances. No parcel of Owned Real Property or
Leased Real Property is subject to any governmental decree or
order to be sold or is being condemned, expropriated or
otherwise taken by any public authority with or without payment
of compensation therefore, nor, to the knowledge of the Company,
has any such condemnation, expropriation or taking been
proposed. The Company has provided the Acquiror true, correct
and complete copies of all leases, lease guaranties, subleases,
agreements for the leasing, use or occupancy of, or otherwise
granting a right in or relating to the Leased Real Property,
including all amendments, terminations and modifications thereof
(the Lease Agreements), and there are no
other Lease Agreements for real property affecting the Leased
Real Property or to which the Company is bound. All Lease
Agreements and all amendments and modifications thereto are in
full force and effect, and there exists no default under any
such lease by the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any other
party thereto, nor any event which, with notice or lapse of time
or both, would constitute a default thereunder by the Company,
any of its Subsidiaries or any other party thereto. All leases
of Leased Real Property will remain valid and binding in
accordance with their terms immediately following the Closing
Date. The Company does not owe brokerage commissions or finders
fees with respect to any such Leased Real Property or would not
owe any such fees if any existing Lease Agreement were renewed
pursuant to any renewal options contained in such Lease
Agreements.
(b) Except as set forth by the express terms of the leases
set forth on Schedule 3.17(b) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules, there are no contractual or legal restrictions
that preclude or materially restrict the ability to use any
Owned Real Property or Leased Real Property by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries for the current or contemplated use of
such real property. There are no known defects or adverse
physical conditions affecting the Owned Real Property or Leased
Real Property that materially impact the use thereof by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries. All plants, warehouses,
distribution centers, structures and other buildings on the
Owned Real Property or Leased Real Property are adequately
maintained and are in good operating condition and repair for
the requirements of the business of the Company and its
Subsidiaries as currently conducted and as currently proposed to
be conducted.
Section 3.18 Intellectual
Property.
(a) Schedule 3.18 of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth a true and complete list of all
registered and material unregistered Marks, Patents and
registered Copyrights, including any pending applications to
register any of the foregoing, owned (in whole or in part) by or
exclusively licensed to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries,
identifying for each whether it is owned by or exclusively
licensed to the Company or the relevant Subsidiary.
(b) No registered Mark identified on Schedule 3.18
of the Company Disclosure Schedules has been or is now
involved in any opposition or cancellation proceeding and, to
the knowledge of the Company, no such proceeding is or has been
threatened with respect to any of such Marks. No Patent
identified on Schedule 3.18 of the Company Disclosure
Schedules has been or is now involved in any interference,
reissue or reexamination proceeding and, to the knowledge of the
Company, no such proceeding is or has been threatened with
respect thereto any of such Patents.
(c) The Company or its Subsidiaries exclusively own, free
and clear of any and all Encumbrances, all Intellectual Property
identified on Schedule 3.18 of the Company Disclosure
Schedules and all other Intellectual Property used in the
Companys and its Subsidiaries businesses other than
Intellectual Property that is licensed to the Company by a third
party licensor pursuant to a written license agreement that
remains in effect. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has received any notice or claim challenging the
Companys ownership of any
A-30
of the Intellectual Property owned (in whole or in part) by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, nor to the knowledge of the
Company is there a reasonable basis for any claim that the
Company does not so own any of such Intellectual Property.
(d) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries has taken all
reasonable steps in accordance with standard industry practices
to protect its rights in its Intellectual Property and at all
times has maintained the confidentiality of all information that
constitutes or constituted a Trade Secret of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries. The Company or one if its Subsidiaries owns
exclusively all intellectual property and work product created
by any Employees in the course of such Employees
employment or engagement by the Company or any Subsidiary.
(e) All registered Marks, issued Patents and registered
Copyrights identified on Schedule 3.18 of the Company
Disclosure Schedules (Company Registered
IP) are valid, enforceable and subsisting and neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any notice
or claim challenging the validity or enforceability of any
Company Registered IP or alleging any misuse of such Company
Registered IP. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries
has taken any action or failed to take any action that could
reasonably be expected to result in the abandonment,
cancellation, forfeiture, relinquishment, invalidation or
unenforceability of any of the Company Registered IP (including
the failure to pay any filing, examination, issuance, post
registration and maintenance fees, annuities and the like and
the failure to disclose any known material prior art in
connection with the prosecution of patent applications). All
Company Registered IP has been obtained in accordance in all
material respects with all applicable legal requirements and is
currently in effect in accordance with all applicable legal
requirements (including, in the case of registered Company
Marks, the timely post-registration filing of affidavits of use
and incontestability and renewal applications). The Company has
timely paid all filing, examination, issuance, post registration
and maintenance fees, annuities and the like associated with or
required with respect to the registrations of the Company
Registered IP.
(f) The development, manufacture, sale, distribution or
other commercial exploitation of products, and the provision of
any services, by or on behalf of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, and all of the other activities or operations of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, have not infringed upon,
misappropriated, violated, diluted or constituted the
unauthorized use of, any Intellectual Property of any third
party, and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
received any notice or claim asserting or suggesting that any
such infringement, misappropriation, violation, dilution or
unauthorized use is or may be occurring or has or may have
occurred, nor to the knowledge of the Company, is there a
reasonable basis therefor. No Intellectual Property owned by or
licensed to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is subject to
any outstanding order, judgment, decree, stipulation or
agreement restricting the use or licensing thereof by the
Company or its Subsidiaries. To the knowledge of the Company, no
third party is misappropriating, infringing, diluting or
violating any Intellectual Property owned by or exclusively
licensed to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in a material
manner.
(g) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
transferred ownership of, or granted any exclusive license with
respect to, any material Intellectual Property. Upon the
consummation of the Closing, the Interim Surviving Corporation
and the Final Surviving Entity shall succeed to all of the
material Intellectual Property rights necessary for the conduct
of the Companys and its Subsidiaries businesses as
they are currently conducted and currently proposed to be
conducted by the Company and its Subsidiaries, and all of such
rights shall be exercisable by the Interim Surviving Corporation
and the Final Surviving Entity to the same extent as by the
Company and its Subsidiaries prior to the Closing. No loss or
expiration of any of the material Intellectual Property used by
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in the conduct of its
business is pending or, to the knowledge of the Company,
threatened, or reasonably foreseeable.
(h) Schedule 3.18(h) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth a complete and accurate list of all
agreements, which are in effect at the Effective Time, granting
to the Company or any Subsidiary any material right or license
under or with respect to any Intellectual Property other than
any end user non-exclusive license of generally commercially
available software used in the Companys or any
Subsidiarys operations and that has not been customized or
otherwise modified by or for the Company or such Subsidiary and
are licensed for an aggregate license fee of no more than One
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) (collectively, the
Inbound License Agreements), indicating for
each the title and the parties thereto. Complete and accurate
copies of the Inbound License Agreements have been provided by
the Company to the Acquiror or its Representatives
A-31
Schedule 3.18(h)(1) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth a complete and accurate estimate of the
amount of any future royalty, license fee or other payments that
may become payable by the Company or any Subsidiary under each
such Inbound License Agreements by reason of the use or
exploitation of the Intellectual Property licensed thereunder.
Assuming that the Consents referred to in
Schedule 3.18(h) of the Company Disclosure Schedules
are obtained or made, the rights licensed under each Inbound
License Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect
and shall be exercisable by the Interim Surviving Corporation
and Final Surviving Entity on and after the Closing to the same
extent as by the Company or the applicable Subsidiary prior to
the Closing. No loss or termination (excluding expiration
pursuant to the terms of the license) of any material
Intellectual Property licensed to the Company or any Subsidiary
under any Inbound License Agreement is pending or, to the
knowledge of the Company, threatened. Except as set forth in
Schedule 3.18(h) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules, no licensor under any Inbound License Agreement
has any material ownership or exclusive license rights in or
with respect to any improvements made by the Company or any
Subsidiary to the Intellectual Property licensed thereunder.
Schedule 3.18(h) of the Company Disclosure Schedules
sets forth a complete and accurate list of all material license
agreements under which the Company or any Subsidiary grants any
rights under any Intellectual Property owned by or exclusively
licensed to the Company or any Subsidiary, including without
limitation any license agreement under which any exclusive or
quasi-exclusive rights are granted or that include any negative
covenant that restricts or limits the Companys freedom of
action in any respect.
(i) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.18(i) of the
Company Disclosure Schedules, the Intellectual Property
owned by the Company or any Subsidiary, together with the
Intellectual Property licensed under the Inbound License
Agreements to the Company or any Subsidiary, constitutes all the
Intellectual Property rights necessary for the conduct of the
Companys and its Subsidiaries businesses as they are
currently conducted and currently contemplated by the Company to
be conducted, excluding end user non-exclusive licenses of
generally commercially available software used in the
Companys operations and that have not been modified by or
for the Company and are licensed for an aggregate license fee of
no more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000).
(j) Schedule 3.18(j) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth a complete and accurate list of all of
the material Software that is used in the businesses of the
Company and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted and is not
(in whole or in part) licensed to the Company or a Subsidiary
pursuant to a written license agreement (collectively,
Company Software). The Company Software was
either (A) developed by Employees of the Company or a
Subsidiary within the scope of their employment,
(B) developed by independent contractors who have expressly
assigned their Intellectual Property rights in such Company
Software to the Company or a Subsidiary pursuant to written
agreements or (C) otherwise acquired by the Company or a
Subsidiary from a third party pursuant to a written agreement in
which the Intellectual Property rights therein were expressly
assigned to the Company. To the knowledge of the Company, the
Company Software does not contain any programming code,
documentation or other materials that embody or utilize
Intellectual Property rights of any Person other than the
Company or a Subsidiary, except for such materials obtained by
the Company or a Subsidiary from other Persons that make such
materials generally available to all interested purchasers or
end-users on standard commercial terms. No source code of any
Company Software has been licensed or otherwise provided by the
Company or any Subsidiary to another Person other than an escrow
agent pursuant to the terms of a source code escrow agreement
identified on Schedule 3.18(j) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules and all such source code has been safeguarded and
protected as Trade Secrets of the Company or a Subsidiary.
Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has embedded any
open source, copyleft or community source code in any of its
products generally available or in development and intended to
become generally available, including but not limited to any
libraries or code licensed under any general public license,
lesser general public license or similar license arrangement, in
a manner that would cause such products to become subject to any
Open Source License. For purposes hereof,
(x) Software means any and all
(1) computer programs, including any and all software
implementations of algorithms, models and methodologies, whether
in source code or object code, (2) databases and electronic
compilations, including any and all data and collections of
data, whether machine readable or other electronic form,
(3) descriptions, flow-charts and other work product used
to design, plan, organize and develop any of the foregoing and
(4) all documentation, including user manuals and training
materials, relating to any of the foregoing and
(y) Open Source License means any
license that requires as a condition of use, modification
and/or
distribution of Software subject to such license, (a) the
licensor to permit reverse-engineering of the licensed Software
or other Software incorporated into, derived from, or
distributed with such licensed Software, or (b) that
A-32
such Software or other Software combined
and/or
distributed with such Software be disclosed or distributed in
source code form, licensed for the purpose of making derivative
works, redistributable at no charge.
(k) Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is a member of,
and has not made any contribution to, or otherwise participated
in, a standards body that requires, as a result of any such
activities, Company to grant or offer any third party any
license or right to the Companys Intellectual Property, or
otherwise restricted in its ability to assert any rights to the
Companys Intellectual Property.
(l) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.18(l) of the
Company Disclosure Schedules, the Company and its
Subsidiaries have taken commercially reasonable steps intended
to ensure that Company Software is free of any disabling codes
or instructions, and any virus or other intentionally created,
undocumented contaminant, that may, or may be used to, access,
modify, delete, damage or disable in any material respect any of
the internal computer systems (including hardware, software,
databases and embedded control systems) of the Company. The
Company and its Subsidiaries have taken reasonable steps to
safeguard such systems against the same and restrict
unauthorized access thereto. The Company has disclosed to the
Acquiror its disaster recovery plans and procedures (if any).
The Companys and the Subsidiaries technology systems
and infrastructure, including without limitation middleware,
servers, workstations, routers, and all other information
technology software or equipment used by or for the Company and
its Subsidiaries is adequate for the conduct of the
Companys and its Subsidiaries businesses as they are
currently conducted and currently contemplated to be conducted
by the Company.
(m) All products of the Company and its Subsidiaries
(Company Products) (i) perform in all
material respects in accordance with the design specifications
pursuant to which the Company Products were developed and
(ii) are fully interoperable with the operating platforms
and hardware specified in their user documentation. Without
limiting the foregoing, (A) there are no material defects,
malfunctions or nonconformities in any of the Company Products;
(B) during the last three (3) years, there have been,
and are, no material claims asserted against the Company or any
Subsidiary or any of their distributors related to the Company
Products; and (C) the Company has not received and does
have any knowledge regarding any requirements to recall any
Company Products. The Company has disclosed in writing to
Acquiror all information relating to any problem or issue with
respect to any of the Company Products that may reasonably be
expected to materially and adversely affect the value,
functionality or fitness for the intended purpose of such
Company Product.
(n) No government funding, facilities or resources of a
university, college, other educational institution or research
center or funding from third parties was used in the development
of the Intellectual Property owned by or exclusively licensed to
the Company or any Subsidiary and (ii) no Governmental
Entity, university, college, other educational institution or
research center has any claim or right in or to such
Intellectual Property. No current or former employee, consultant
or independent contractor of the Company who was involved in, or
who contributed to, the creation or development of any
Intellectual Property owned by or exclusively licensed to the
Company or any Subsidiary, has performed services for the
government, a university, college or other educational
institution, or a research center, during a period of time
during which such employee, consultant or independent contractor
was also performing services for the Company or any Subsidiary.
(o) Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has contributed
or licensed, or agreed to contribute or license, any Software or
any Intellectual Property to or through any standards body,
standard setting organization, industry consortium, licensing
pool, Governmental Entity, or other industry group or consortium
(each, a Standards Body). Neither the Company
nor any Subsidiary is a member of any Standards Body and has not
participated in the development or approval of any standards or
specifications proposed or established by any Standards Body.
The Company has not agreed to dedicate any Software or
Intellectual Property to the public, to make generally available
any licenses to any Software or Intellectual Property, or to
make any licenses available on a royalty free basis or on fair,
reasonable or non-discriminatory terms in connection with any
Standards Body or otherwise.
(p) To the knowledge of the Company, no Employee is
obligated under any agreement, or subject to any judgment,
decree or order of any court or administrative agency, or any
other restriction, that would or may interfere with such
Employee carrying out his or her duties for the Company or such
Subsidiary or that would conflict with the conduct of the
businesses of the Company or any Subsidiary. To the knowledge of
the Company, it is not utilizing, nor will it be necessary for
it to utilize, any inventions of any Employees of the Company or
any Subsidiary (or persons the Company currently intends to
hire) made, or any confidential information (including Trade
Secrets)
A-33
of any third party to which such Employees were exposed, prior
to their employment by the Company or such Subsidiary.
(q) Except as expressly set forth in the Inbound License
Agreements and the Settlement Agreement, the Company is not, and
the Interim Surviving Corporation and Final Surviving Entity
shall not, be required to make or accrue any royalty or other
payment to any third party in connection with any of the Company
Products.
Section 3.19 Taxes.
(a) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries has accurately
prepared and timely filed all Returns required to be filed by
it. Such Returns are accurate and correct and do not contain a
disclosure statement under Section 6662 of the Tax Code or
any predecessor provision or comparable provision of state,
local or foreign Law. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has filed, nor is it required to have filed, a
Company Disclosure Schedules pursuant to Temp. Treas. Reg.
§ 1.6011-4. Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is and
has been in compliance with all applicable Laws pertaining to
Taxes, including all applicable Laws relating to record
retention.
(b) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries has timely
paid all Taxes it is required to have paid and has adequately
provided for all Taxes for which it is required to provide. All
Taxes of the Company and its Subsidiaries accrued following the
end of the most recent period covered by the Interim Financial
Statements, Financial Statements, Interim Subsidiary Financial
Statements or 2008 Subsidiary Financial Statements, as
applicable, have been accrued in the ordinary course of business
and do not exceed comparable amounts incurred in similar periods
in prior years (taking into account any changes in the
Companys or the applicable Subsidiarys operating
results).
(c) No claim has been made by any taxing authority in any
jurisdiction where the Company or any of its Subsidiaries does
not file Returns that it is or may be subject to Tax by that
jurisdiction. No extensions or waivers of statutes of
limitations with respect to any Returns have been given by or
requested from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(d) Schedule 3.19(d) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth (i) those years for which
examinations by the taxing authorities have been completed and
(ii) those taxable years for which examinations by taxing
authorities are presently being conducted.
(e) Except as disclosed in Schedule 3.19(e) of the
Company Disclosure Schedules, neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries is a party to any Action by any taxing
authority, nor does the Company or any of its Subsidiaries have
knowledge of any pending or threatened Action by any taxing
authority.
(f) All deficiencies asserted or assessments made against
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries as a result of any
examinations by any taxing authority have been fully paid and no
rationale underlying a claim for Taxes has been asserted
previously by any taxing authority that reasonably could be
expected to be asserted in any other period.
(g) There are no Encumbrances for Taxes, other than
Encumbrances for current Taxes not yet due and payable, upon the
assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(h) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to or bound by any tax indemnity, tax sharing or tax
allocation agreement.
(i) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to or bound by any closing agreement or offer in
compromise with any taxing authority.
(j) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
been a member of an affiliated group of corporations, within the
meaning of Section 1504 of the Tax Code, or a member of a
combined, consolidated or unitary group for state, local or
foreign Tax purposes, other than a group of which the Company is
the common parent. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has any liability for Taxes of any Person other
than the Company and its Subsidiaries under Treasury Regulations
Section 1.1502-6
or any corresponding provision of state, local or foreign income
Tax Law, as transferee or successor, by Contract or otherwise.
(k) None of the assets of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is property that the Company or such Subsidiary is
required to treat as being owned by any other Person pursuant to
the so-called safe harbor lease
A-34
provisions of former Section 168(f)(8) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. None of the assets of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries directly or indirectly
secures any debt the interest on which is tax exempt under
Section 103(a) of the Tax Code. None of the assets of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries is tax-exempt use
property within the meaning of Section 168(h) of the
Tax Code. None of the assets of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is required to be or is being depreciated pursuant
to the alternative depreciation system under
Section 168(g)(2) of the Tax Code.
(l) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
agreed to make, nor is it required to make, any adjustment under
Sections 481(a) or 263A of the Tax Code or any comparable
provision of state, local or foreign Tax Laws by reason of a
change in accounting method or otherwise. Neither the Company
nor any of its Subsidiaries has taken any action that is not in
accordance with past practice that could defer a liability for
Taxes of the Company or any Subsidiary from any taxable period
ending on or before the Closing Date to any taxable period
ending after such date. Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries
has at all times used the accrual method of accounting for
income Tax purposes.
(m) Schedule 3.19(m) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth all foreign jurisdictions in which the
Company and its Subsidiaries are subject to Tax, are engaged in
business or have a permanent establishment. Neither the Company
nor any of its Subsidiaries has entered into a gain recognition
agreement pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-8. Neither the
Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has transferred an
intangible the transfer of which would be subject to the rules
of Section 367(d) of the Tax Code.
(n) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to any joint venture, partnership, or other arrangement or
Contract that could be treated as a partnership for federal
income tax purposes. Schedule 3.19(n) of the Company
Disclosure Schedules sets forth all elections pursuant to
Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3 that have been made by business
entities in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries owns an
equity interest.
(o) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is, or
has been, a United States real property holding corporation, as
defined in Section 897(c)(2) of the Tax Code, during the
applicable period specified in Section 897(c)(1)(a) of the
Tax Code.
(p) There is currently no limitation on the utilization of
net operating losses, capital losses, built-in losses, tax
credits or similar items of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries under Sections 269, 382, 383, 384 or 1502 of
the Tax Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder and
comparable provisions of state, local or foreign Law.
(q) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
been a distributing corporation or a
controlled corporation in connection with a
distribution described in Section 355 of the Tax Code.
Section 3.20 Tax
Treatment. Neither the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries nor, to the knowledge of the Company, any of their
Affiliates, directors of officers has taken or has agreed to
take any action that would prevent the First-Step Merger or the
Second-Step Merger from constituting a reorganization qualifying
under the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Tax Code.
Section 3.21 Environmental
Matters.
(a) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is and has
been in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws. None
of the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of its or their
executive officers has received during the past five years, nor
is there any basis for, any communication or complaint from a
Governmental Authority or other Person alleging that the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries has any liability under any
Environmental Law or is not in compliance with any Environmental
Law.
(b) No Hazardous Substances are or have been present, and
there is and has been no Release or threatened Release of
Hazardous Substances nor any
clean-up or
corrective action of any kind relating thereto, on any
properties (including any buildings, structures, improvements,
soils and surface, subsurface and ground waters thereof)
currently or formerly owned, leased or operated by or for the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any predecessor company,
at any location to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
has sent any Hazardous Substances or at any other location with
respect to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries may be
liable. No underground improvement, including any treatment or
storage tank or water, gas or oil well, is or has been located
on any property described in the foregoing sentence. Neither the
Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is actually,
A-35
contingently, potentially or allegedly liable for any Release
of, threatened Release of or contamination by Hazardous
Substances or otherwise under any Environmental Law. There is no
pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened
investigation by any Governmental Authority , nor any pending
or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened Action with
respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries relating to
Hazardous Substances or otherwise under any Environmental Law.
(c) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries holds all
Environmental Permits, and is and has been in compliance
therewith. Neither the execution, delivery or performance of
this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby will (i) require any notice, waiver,
authorization, registration, declaration, filing, approval,
order, Permit or Consent of or to any Governmental Authority or
other Person pursuant to any applicable Environmental Law or
Environmental Permit or (ii) subject any Environmental
Permit to suspension, cancellation, modification, revocation or
nonrenewal.
(d) The Company and its Subsidiaries have provided to the
Acquiror all Phase I, Phase II or
other environmental assessment reports in their possession or to
which they have reasonable access addressing locations ever
owned, operated or leased by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or at which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
actually, potentially or allegedly may have liability under any
Environmental Law.
(e) For purposes of this Agreement:
(i) Environmental Laws means: any
Laws of any Governmental Authority relating to (A) releases
or threatened releases of Hazardous Substances or materials
containing Hazardous Substances; (B) the manufacture,
handling, transport, use, treatment, storage or disposal of
Hazardous Substances or materials containing Hazardous
Substances; or (C) pollution or protection of the
environment, health, safety or natural resources.
(ii) Environmental Permits means
all Permits under any Environmental Law.
(iii) Hazardous Substances means:
(A) those substances defined in or regulated under the
Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA), the Clean Water Act, the Safe
Drinking Water Act, the Atomic Energy Act, the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and the Clean Air
Act, and their state counterparts, as each may be amended from
time to time, and all regulations thereunder; (B) petroleum
and petroleum products, including crude oil and any fractions
thereof; (C) natural gas, synthetic gas, and any mixtures
thereof; (D) polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos and radon;
(E) any other pollutant or contaminant; and (F) any
substance, material or waste regulated by any Governmental
Authority pursuant to any Environmental Law.
(iv) Release has the meaning set
forth in Section 101(22) of CERCLA.
Section 3.22 Material
Contracts.
(a) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.22(a) of the
Company Disclosure Schedules, as of the date hereof, neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or is
bound by any Contract of the following nature (such Contracts as
are required to be set forth in Schedule 3.22(a) of the
Company Disclosure Schedules being Company Material
Contracts):
(i) any broker, distributor, dealer, manufacturers
representative, franchise, or agency Contract;
(ii) any continuing sales or purchase, sales promotion,
market research, marketing, consulting or advertising Contract
that involves obligations after the date of this Agreement in
excess of $25,000 individually or in the aggregate and is not
cancelable without penalty;
(iii) any Contract relating to or evidencing indebtedness
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, including mortgages,
other grants of security interests, guarantees or notes;
(iv) any Contract pursuant to which the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries has provided funds to or made any loan, capital
contribution or other investment in, or assumed any liability or
obligation of, any Person, including take-or-pay Contracts or
keepwell agreements;
A-36
(v) any Contract with any Governmental Authority;
(vi) any Contract with any Related Party of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries;
(vii) any consulting Contract;
(viii) any Employment Agreement involving aggregate
payments, rights
and/or
benefits in excess of $100,000, other than Contracts for
employment covered in clauses (vi) or (vii);
(ix) any Contract that limits, or purports to limit, or
that may reasonably be expected to limit, impair or prohibit in
any way the ability of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to
conduct its business or compete in any line of business or with
any Person or in any geographic area or during any period of
time, or that restricts the right of the Company and its
Subsidiaries to sell to or purchase from any Person or to hire
any Person, or that grants the other party or any third person
most favored nation status or any type of special
discount rights;
(x) any Contract that requires a Consent to or otherwise
contains a provision relating to a change of
control, or that would prohibit or delay the consummation
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the
Ancillary Agreements;
(xi) any Contract pursuant to which the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries is the lessee or lessor of, or holds, uses, or
makes available for use to any Person (other than the Company or
a Subsidiary thereof), (A) any real property or
(B) any tangible personal property and, in the case of
clause (B), that involves an aggregate future or potential
liability or receivable, as the case may be, in excess of
$25,000;
(xii) any Contract providing for indemnification to or from
any Person with respect to liabilities relating to any current
or former business of the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or
any predecessor Person;
(xiii) any Contract containing confidentiality clauses;
(xiv) any Contract relating in whole or in part to any
Intellectual Property;
(xv) any joint venture or partnership, merger, asset or
stock purchase or divestiture Contract relating to the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries;
(xvi) any Contract with any labor union or providing for
benefits under any Plan;
(xvii) any Contract for the purchase of any debt or equity
security or other ownership interest of any Person, or for the
issuance of any debt or equity security or other ownership
interest, or the conversion of any obligation, instrument or
security into debt or equity securities or other ownership
interests of, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries;
(xviii) any Contract relating to settlement of any
administrative or judicial proceedings within the past five
years;
(xix) any Contract that results in any Person holding a
power of attorney from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
that relates to the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of
their respective businesses; and
(xx) any other Contract (A) made in the ordinary
course of business that involves a payment or receivable, as the
case may be, in excess of $100,000 on an annual basis or in
excess of $250,000 over the current Contract term, (B) not
made in the ordinary course of business that involves a payment
or receivable, as the case may be, in excess of $25,000 on an
annual basis or in excess of $50,000 over the current Contract
term, (C) has a term greater than one year and cannot be
cancelled by the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company without
penalty or further payment and without more than
30 days notice or (D) is material to the
business, operations, assets, financial condition, results of
operations or prospects of the Company and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole.
(b) Each Company Material Contract is a legal, valid,
binding and enforceable agreement and is in full force and
effect, except as the same may be limited by bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar Law now or
hereafter in effect relating to creditors rights,
generally and subject to general principles of equity. The
Company has fulfilled all material obligations required to have
been performed by the Company prior to the date
A-37
hereof pursuant to each Company Material Contract, and to the
knowledge of the Company, without giving effect to the Merger,
the Company will fulfill, when due, all of its obligations under
such Contracts that remain to be performed after the date
hereof. None of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or, to
the knowledge of the Company, any other party is in breach or
violation of, or (with or without notice or lapse of time or
both) default under, any Company Material Contract, nor has the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries received any notice or claim
of any such breach, violation or default or any other dispute
relating the any Company Material Contract. The Company has
delivered or made available to the Acquiror true and complete
copies of all Company Material Contracts, including any
amendments thereto.
Section 3.23 Affiliate
Interests and Transactions.
(a) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.23(a) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, no Related Party of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries: (i) owns or has owned, directly
or indirectly, any equity or other financial or voting interest
in any competitor, supplier, licensor, lessor, distributor,
independent contractor or customer of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or their business or any Contract to which the
Company is a party; (ii) owns or has owned, directly or
indirectly, or has or has had any interest in any property (real
or personal, tangible or intangible) that the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries uses or has used in or pertaining to the
business of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries;
(iii) has or has had any business dealings or a financial
interest in any transaction with the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or involving any assets or property of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries, other than business dealings or
transactions conducted in the ordinary course of business at
prevailing market prices and on prevailing market terms; or
(iv) is or has been employed by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries.
(b) There are no outstanding notes payable to, accounts
receivable from or advances by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries to, and neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries is otherwise a debtor or creditor of, or has any
liability or other obligation of any nature to, any Related
Party of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. Since the date
of the Company Balance Sheet, neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has incurred any obligation or liability to, or
entered into or agreed to enter into any transaction with or for
the benefit of, any Related Party of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, other than the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements.
Section 3.24 Insurance. Schedule 3.24
of the Company Disclosure Schedules sets forth a true and
complete list of all casualty, directors and officers liability,
general liability, product liability and all other types of
insurance maintained with respect to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, together with the carriers and liability limits
for each such policy. All such policies are in full force and
effect. All premiums with respect thereto have been paid to the
extent due. No notice of cancellation, termination, increase in
premium or reduction of coverage has been received with respect
to any such policy. No claim currently is pending under any such
policy. The Company reasonably believes that types and amounts
of coverage provided by the insurance policies listed on
Schedule 3.24 of the Company Disclosure Schedules
are reasonable in the context of the business and operations in
which the Company and its Subsidiaries are engaged. The
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
and the Ancillary Agreements will not cause a cancellation or
reduction in the coverage of such policies.
Section 3.25 Brokers. No
broker, finder or investment banker is entitled to any
brokerage, finders or other fee or commission in
connection with the transactions contemplated hereby or under
any Ancillary Agreement based upon arrangements made by or on
behalf of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, nor will the
Acquiror, the Interim Surviving Corporation or the Final
Surviving Entity incur, directly or indirectly, any such
liability based on arrangements made by or on behalf of the
Company.
Section 3.26 Accuracy
of Information Furnished; Disclosure.
(a) The Company and its Subsidiaries have delivered true
and complete copies of each document (or summaries of same) that
has been requested by the Acquiror or its counsel, including all
Contracts and other documents listed on the Company Disclosure
Schedules. No representation or warranty by the Company
contained in this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements, the
Company Disclosure Schedules, or in any exhibits, schedules,
lists, certificates or other documents delivered to the Acquiror
by the Company or its Subsidiaries and referred to herein or
therein, and no statement in any certificate furnished or to be
furnished by or on behalf of the Company or
A-38
any Subsidiary pursuant hereto or in connection with the
transaction contemplated hereby, contains or will contain as of
the date such representation or warranty is made or such
certificate is or will be furnished, any untrue statement of a
material fact, or omits, or will omit to state as of the date
such representation or warranty is made or such certificate is
or will be furnished, any material fact which is necessary to
make the statements contained herein or therein not misleading.
To the knowledge of the Company, there are no facts which are
material to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or which
could have a Company Material Adverse Effect which the Company
has not disclosed to the Acquiror in writing.
(b) The information supplied by the Company for inclusion
in the Joint Proxy Statement or other information included in
any information statement or proxy statement relating to the
Company Shareholders Meeting or the Acquiror Shareholders
Meeting, will not, at the time it is mailed to the Company
Shareholders and Acquiror Shareholders, respectively, contain
any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein not false or misleading at
the time and in the light of the circumstances under which such
statements are made.
Section 3.27 Inventory. Schedule 3.27
of the Company Disclosure Schedules sets forth a true and
complete list of all inventory of the Company and its
Subsidiaries as of November 30, 2008, the value thereof and
the address at which such inventory was located as of such date.
No inventory has been consigned to, or held on consignment from,
any third person. Such inventory and any additional items of
inventory arising since November 30, 2008 were acquired and
have been maintained in accordance with the regular business
practices of the Company and its Subsidiaries, consist of new
and unused items of a quality and quantity substantially all of
which is usable or saleable in the ordinary course of business,
and is valued at prices equal to the lower of cost or realizable
value and in accordance with the internal accounting practices
of the Company and its Subsidiaries applied on a basis
consistent with the Financial Statements, each consistently
applied throughout the periods covered by the Financial
Statements, with adequate provisions or adjustments for excess
inventory, slow-moving inventory, spoilage and inventory
obsolescence and shrinkage. The inventory (including items of
inventory acquired or manufactured subsequent to
November 30, 2008) consists, and will as of the
Closing Date consist, of products of quality and quantity
commercially usable and salable at not substantially less than
cost in the ordinary course of business, except for any items of
obsolete material or material below standard quality,
substantially all of which have been written down to realizable
market value, or for which adequate reserves have been provided,
and, except as described in Schedule 3.27 of the Company
Disclosure Schedules, the present quantities of all
inventory are reasonable in the present circumstances of the
Company and its Subsidiaries and consistent with the average
level of inventory in the past 24 months.
Section 3.28 Customers
and Suppliers.
(a) Schedule 3.28(a) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth a true and complete list of
(i) the names and addresses of the top ten purchasers of
the Company and its Subsidiaries (determined on the basis of
revenues) during the 12 months ended November 30,
2008, (ii) the amount for which each such client was
invoiced during such period and (iii) the percentage of the
consolidated total sales of the Company and its Subsidiaries
represented by sales to each such customer during such period.
Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any
notice or has any reason to believe (other than solely as a
result of changes in general economic, financial market,
business or geopolitical conditions) that any of such clients
(A) has ceased or substantially reduced, or will cease or
substantially reduce, use of products or services of the Company
or its Subsidiaries or (B) has sought, or is seeking, to
reduce the price it will pay for the services of the Company or
its Subsidiaries. None of such clients has otherwise, to the
knowledge of the Company, threatened to take any action
described in the preceding sentence as a result of the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
and the Ancillary Agreements.
(b) Schedule 3.28(b) of the Company Disclosure
Schedules sets forth a true and complete list of
(i) the top ten suppliers of the Company and its
Subsidiaries (determined on the basis of payables to such
suppliers) from which the Company or a Subsidiary ordered
products or services during for the 12 months ended
November 30, 2008 and (ii) the amount for which each
such supplier invoiced the Company or such Subsidiary during
such period. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
received any notice or has any reason to believe (other than
solely as a result of changes in general economic, financial
market, business or geopolitical conditions) that there has been
any material adverse change in the price of such supplies or
services provided by any such supplier, or than any such
A-39
supplier will not sell supplies or services to the Interim
Surviving Corporation or the Final Surviving Entity or their
respective Subsidiaries at any time after the Closing Date on
terms and conditions substantially the same as those used in its
current sales to the Company and its Subsidiaries, subject to
general and customary price increases. No such supplier has
otherwise, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened to take
any action described in the preceding sentence as a result of
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements.
Section 3.29 Warranties. The
Company has heretofore delivered to the Acquiror true and
correct copies of all written warranties currently in effect
covering the respective products and services of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries. During the past three (3) years,
neither the Company nor its Subsidiaries has incurred any
material warranty expenses during any one year.
Section 3.30 Capital
Expenditures. The aggregate contractual
commitments of the Company and its Subsidiaries for new capital
expenditures do not exceed $50,000 at November 30, 2008.
Section 3.31 Key
Employees. Schedule 3.31 of the
Company Disclosure Schedules lists the name, place of
employment, current annual salary rates, bonuses, deferred or
contingent compensation, pension, accrued vacation, golden
parachute and other like benefits paid or payable (in cash
or otherwise) in the past four years, the date of employment and
a description of the position and job function of each current
salaried Employee, officer, director, consultant or agent of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries whose annual compensation
exceeded (or, in 2008, is expected to exceed) $100,000.
Section 3.32 Expenses. The
Schedule of Expenses delivered to the Acquiror sets forth or
will set forth, when delivered pursuant to
Section 2.14, (i) a true and complete list of
all Company Transaction Expenses that have been paid (or for
which invoices have been received) or will be due and payable
that have been paid as of the Closing Date, (ii) a good
faith estimate of all such additional Company Transaction
Expenses that have been incurred or are reasonably expected to
be incurred as of the Closing Date but are not reflected in
clause (i) hereof, and (iii) a good faith estimate of
any additional Company Transaction Expenses that are reasonably
expected to be incurred after the Closing Date.
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
OF THE ACQUIROR, FIRST-STEP MERGER SUB AND SECOND-STEP
MERGER SUB
Except as set forth in the corresponding sections or subsections
of the Acquiror Disclosure Schedules attached hereto
(collectively, the Acquiror Disclosure
Schedules) (each of which shall qualify only the
specifically identified section or subsection of this
Article III to which such Company Disclosure Schedules
relates and any other section or subsection of this
Article III to the extent that it is reasonably apparent
from a reading of the face of the disclosure (without having to
refer to the underlying documents being disclosed) that such
disclosure is relevant and applicable to such other section and
subsection), or as set forth in Acquirors SEC Reports, the
Acquiror hereby represents and warrants to the Company as of the
date hereof, on and as of the Closing Date, as though made at
the Closing Date, and on and as of the Effective Time, as though
made at the Effective Time, as follows:
Section 4.1 Organization.
Each of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step
Merger Sub is a corporation or limited liability company, as the
case may be, duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the Laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation and
has full corporate or limited liability company power and
authority to own, lease and operate its properties and to carry
on its business as it is now being conducted. The
Acquirors articles of incorporation and bylaws are in full
force and effect have not been amended, and the Acquiror Board
has not approved or proposed any amendment thereof, since the
date of the Acquirors most recent
Form 10-Q
or, if later,
Form 8-K
on file with the SEC.
Section 4.2 Authority.
Each of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step
Merger Sub has full corporate power and authority to execute and
deliver this Agreement and each of the Ancillary Agreements to
which it will be a party and, subject to obtaining approval of
the Acquiror Shareholders representing a majority of the
A-40
outstanding capital stock of the Acquiror and the approval by
the Acquiror as the sole shareholder of First-Step Merger Sub
and the sole member of Second-Step Merger Sub (which, subject to
Sections 5.3 and 5.5, Acquiror hereby agrees
to give in a timely manner) (such approvals, collectively, the
Acquiror Shareholder Approval), to perform
its obligations hereunder and thereunder and to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby. The execution,
delivery and performance by the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub
and Second-Step Merger Sub of this Agreement and each of the
Ancillary Agreements to which it will be a party and the
consummation by the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and
Second-Step Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated hereby
and thereby have been duly and validly authorized by the Boards
of Directors of the Acquiror and First-Step Merger Sub, and the
sole member of Second-Step Merger Sub. Subject to obtaining
Acquiror Shareholder Approval, no other corporate proceedings on
the part of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step
Merger Sub are necessary to authorize this Agreement or any
Ancillary Agreement or to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby or thereby. This Agreement has been, and
upon their execution each of the Ancillary Agreements to which
the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger Sub
will be a party will have been, duly and validly executed and
delivered by the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step
Merger Sub, as applicable. This Agreement constitutes, and upon
their execution each of the Ancillary Agreements to which the
Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger Sub will
be a party will constitute, the legal, valid and binding
obligations of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and
Second-Step Merger Sub, as applicable, enforceable against the
Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub, as
applicable, in accordance with their respective terms.
Section 4.3 No
Conflict; Required Filings and Consents.
(a) The execution, delivery and performance by each of the
Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub of
this Agreement and each of the Ancillary Agreements to which it
is or will be a party, and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby, assuming the receipt of
Acquiror Shareholder Approval, do not and will not:
(i) conflict with or violate the certificate of
incorporation, articles of incorporation, bylaws or equivalent
organizational documents of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub
or Second-Step Merger Sub;
(ii) conflict with or violate any Law applicable to the
Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger
Sub; or
(iii) result in any breach of, constitute a default (or an
event that, with notice or lapse of time or both, would become a
default) under or require any Consent of any Person pursuant to,
any note, bond, mortgage, indenture, agreement, lease, license,
Permit, franchise, instrument, obligation or other Contract to
which the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger
Sub is a party;
except for any such conflicts, violations, breaches, defaults,
Consents or other occurrences that do not, individually or in
the aggregate, materially impair the ability of the Acquiror,
First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger Sub to consummate,
or prevent or materially delay, any of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements or
would reasonably be expected to do so.
(b) None of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub or
Second-Step Merger Sub is required to file, seek or obtain any
Permit or Consent of or with any Governmental Authority in
connection with the execution, delivery and performance by the
Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub of
this Agreement and each of the Ancillary Agreements to which it
is or will be party or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby or thereby, except for (i) the filing
of the First-Step Merger Certificate of Merger with the
Secretary of State of the State of California, (ii) the
filing of the Second-Step Merger Certificate of Merger with the
Secretary of State of the State of California and the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware, (iii) such filings as
may be required by any applicable federal or state securities or
blue sky Laws (including, for the avoidance of
doubt, the
Form S-4),
and (iv) providing such notices as may be required by
Nasdaq in connection with the listing of Acquiror Common Stock
to be issued in the Merger.
A-41
Section 4.4 Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of the Acquiror on the
date hereof consists of 40,000,000 shares of Acquiror
Common Stock, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $0.001 per share. The number of issued and outstanding
shares of capital stock of the Acquiror as of September 30,
2008 is as set forth in Acquirors
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. All of the
outstanding shares of Acquiror Common Stock have been duly
authorized and validly issued, and are fully paid and
nonassessable. Except as provided by the Preferred Stock Rights
Agreement, none of the outstanding shares of Acquiror Common
Stock is entitled or subject to any preemptive right, right of
participation, right of maintenance or any similar right. None
of the outstanding shares of Acquiror Common Stock is subject to
any right of first refusal in favor of the Acquiror, other than
early exercise rights and rights of repurchases in favor of the
Acquiror with respect to such early exercise rights. Except as
contemplated by this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements,
there is no Contract to which the Acquiror is a party relating
to the voting or registration of any shares of Acquiror Common
Stock.
(b) Except for the Acquiror Option Plans or as contemplated
by this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements, as of
September 30, 2008, the Acquiror does not have any stock
option plan or any other plan, program, agreement or arrangement
providing for any equity or equity-based compensation for any
Person.
(c) Except for the Preferred Stock Rights Agreement or as
contemplated by this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements, as
of September 30, 2008, there were no: (i) outstanding
subscription, option, call, warrant or right (whether or not
currently exercisable) to acquire any shares of the capital
stock or other securities of the Acquiror; (ii) outstanding
security, instrument or obligation that is convertible into or
exchangeable for any shares of the capital stock or other
securities of the Acquiror; (iii) stockholder rights plan
(or similar plan commonly referred to as a poison
pill) or Contract under which the Acquiror is or may
become obligated to sell or otherwise issue any shares of its
capital stock or any other securities; (iv) condition or
circumstance known to the Acquiror that would reasonably be
expected to give rise to a claim by any Person to the effect
that such Person is entitled to acquire or receive from Acquiror
any shares of capital stock or other securities of the Acquiror;
or (v) outstanding or authorized stock appreciation,
phantom stock, profit participating or other similar rights with
respect to the Acquiror.
(d) All outstanding shares of Acquiror Common Stock and
options, warrants and other securities of the Acquiror have been
issued and granted in material compliance with all applicable
securities Laws and other applicable Law.
Section 4.5 Equity
Interests. Schedule 4.5 of the
Acquiror Disclosure Schedules lists each Subsidiary of the
Acquiror as of the date hereof. Except for the Subsidiaries
listed in Schedule 4.5 of the Acquiror Disclosure
Schedules, passive investments or as contemplated by this
Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements, neither the Acquiror nor
any of its Subsidiaries, directly or indirectly, owns any
material equity, partnership, membership or similar interest in,
or any interest that is convertible into, exercisable for the
purchase of or exchangeable for any such material equity,
partnership, membership or similar interest, or is under any
obligation to form or participate in, make any loan, capital
contribution or other investment in, or assume any material
liability or obligation of, any Person.
Section 4.6 SEC
Reports; Financial Statements. (a) The
Acquiror has filed all forms, reports, proxy statements and
other documents required to be filed by it with the SEC since
January 1, 2007 (collectively, SEC
Reports) and all material SEC Reports of the Acquiror
have been filed by the Acquiror in a timely manner. As of its
filing date or, in the case of SEC Reports that are registration
statements filed pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Act, its effective date (or, in each such case, if an SEC Report
was amended or superseded by a subsequent filing, then on the
date of such filing), (i) each SEC Report complied in all
material respects as to form with the applicable requirements of
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act and the applicable rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder, as the case may be, each
as in effect on the applicable date, (ii) no SEC Report
filed pursuant to the Exchange Act contained any untrue
statement of a material fact or omitted to state any material
fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in
the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading, and (iii) no SEC Report that is a registration
statement, as amended or supplemented, if applicable, filed
pursuant to the Securities Act, as of the date such registration
statement or amendment became effective, contained any untrue
statement of a material fact or omitted to state any material
fact required to be stated
A-42
therein or necessary to make the statements made therein not
misleading.(b) The consolidated financial statements (including
any related notes thereto) included in the SEC Reports were
prepared in accordance with GAAP (except as may be indicated in
the notes to such financial statements or, in the case of
unaudited financial statements, as permitted by the SEC under
the Exchange Act, and except that the unaudited financial
statements may not contain footnotes and are subject to normal
and recurring year-end adjustments) applied on a consistent
basis throughout the periods indicated (except as may be
indicated in the notes thereto), and fairly present in all
material respects the consolidated financial position of the
Acquiror as of the respective dates thereof and the consolidated
results of operations and cash flows of the Acquiror for the
periods indicated.
(c) From January 1, 2007, through the date hereof, the
Acquiror has not received any comment letter from the SEC or the
staff thereof or any correspondence from Nasdaq or the staff
thereof relating to the delisting or maintenance of listing of
the Acquiror Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Market. The
Acquiror has not disclosed any unresolved comments in its SEC
Reports.
(d) Since January 1, 2007, there have been no formal
material internal investigations regarding financial reporting
or accounting policies and practices discussed with, reviewed by
or initiated at the direction of the chief executive officer or
chief financial officer of the Acquiror, the Acquiror Board or
any committee thereof, other than ordinary course audits or
reviews of accounting policies and practices or internal
controls required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Section 4.7 Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. Since
September 30, 2008 through the date of this Agreement,
except as otherwise contemplated or permitted by this Agreement
there has not been any change, event or development that,
individually or in the aggregate, has had or is reasonably
likely to have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.8 Compliance
with Law; Permits. (a) Each of the Acquiror
and its Subsidiaries is and has been in compliance with all Laws
applicable to it, except where any non-compliance would not
reasonably be expected to have an Acquiror Material Adverse
Effect. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have an
Acquiror Material Adverse Effect, (i) each of the Acquiror
and its Subsidiaries is in possession of all Permits,
(ii) each of the Acquiror and its Subsidiaries is and has
been in compliance with all such Permits, (iii) all such
Permits are in full force and effect, and (iv) no
suspension, cancellation, modification, revocation or nonrenewal
of any Permit is pending or, to the knowledge of the Acquiror,
threatened.
Section 4.9 Litigation. There
is no Action pending or, to the knowledge of the Acquiror,
threatened against the Acquiror or any of its Subsidiaries or
any property or asset of the Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries, except as would not reasonably be expected to have
an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect. There is no Action pending
or, to the knowledge of the Acquiror, threatened against
Acquiror that seeks to prevent, hinder, modify, delay or
challenge the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the
Ancillary Agreements. There is no outstanding order, writ,
judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award of, or to
the knowledge of the Acquiror pending or threatened
investigation by, any Governmental Authority (i) relating
to the Acquiror, any of its Subsidiaries, any of their
properties or assets, except as would not reasonably be expected
to have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect, or (ii) to
which the Acquiror is a party and relating to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements.
There is no material Action by the Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries pending, or which the Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries has commenced preparations to initiate, against any
other Person. To the knowledge of the Acquiror, no Governmental
Entity has at any time challenged or questioned the legal right
of the Acquiror to conduct its operations as presently or
previously conducted or as currently contemplated to be
conducted.
Section 4.10 Intellectual
Property.
(a) The Acquiror or its Subsidiaries exclusively own, free
and clear of any and all Encumbrances, all Intellectual Property
that is used in the Acquirors and its Subsidiaries
businesses, other than Intellectual Property that is licensed to
the Acquiror by a third party licensor pursuant to a license
agreement that remains in effect, except as would not reasonably
be expected to have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect. Neither
the Acquiror nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any
written notice or claim challenging the Acquirors
ownership or the validity of any of the Intellectual Property
owned (in whole or in part) by the Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries.
A-43
(b) The development, manufacture, sale, distribution or
other commercial exploitation of products, and the provision of
any services, by or on behalf of the Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries, have not infringed upon, misappropriated,
violated, diluted or constituted the unauthorized use of, any
Intellectual Property of any third party, except as would not
reasonably be expected to have an Acquiror Material Adverse
Effect, and neither the Acquiror nor any of its Subsidiaries has
received any written notice or claim asserting or suggesting
that any such infringement, misappropriation, violation,
dilution or unauthorized use is or may be occurring or has or
may have occurred. No Intellectual Property owned by or, to the
knowledge of Acquiror, licensed to the Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries is subject to any outstanding order, judgment,
decree, stipulation or agreement materially restricting the use
or licensing thereof by the Acquiror or its Subsidiaries. To the
knowledge of the Acquiror, no third party is misappropriating,
infringing, diluting or violating any Intellectual Property
owned by or exclusively licensed to the Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries in a material manner.
(c) The Intellectual Property owned by the Acquiror or any
Subsidiary, together with the Intellectual Property licensed to
the Acquiror or any Subsidiary, constitutes all the Intellectual
Property rights necessary for the conduct of the Acquirors
business as it is currently conducted and contemplated to be
conducted by Acquiror, excluding end user non-exclusive licenses
of generally commercially available software used in the
Acquirors operations and that have not been modified by or
for the Acquiror and are licensed for an aggregate license fee
of no more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000).
(d) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have an
Acquiror Material Adverse Effect, all products of the Acquiror
and its Subsidiaries (the Acquiror
Products) (i) perform in all material respects in
accordance with the design specifications pursuant to which the
Acquiror Products were developed and (ii) are fully
interoperable with the operating platforms and hardware
specified in their user documentation. Without limiting the
foregoing, (x) there are no material defects, malfunctions
or nonconformities in any of the Acquiror Products;
(y) during the last three (3) years, there have been,
and are, no material claims asserted against the Acquiror or any
Subsidiary or any of their distributors related to the Acquiror
Products; and (z) the Acquiror has not received and does
have any knowledge regarding any requirements to recall any
Acquiror Products, except in each case as would not reasonably
be expected to have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.11 Taxes. (a) Each
of the Acquiror and its Subsidiaries has accurately prepared and
timely filed all Returns required to be filed by it. Such
Returns are accurate and correct and do not contain a disclosure
statement under Section 6662 of the Tax Code or any
predecessor provision or comparable provision of state, local or
foreign Law. Neither the Acquiror nor any of its Subsidiaries
has filed, nor is it required to have filed, a disclosure
schedule pursuant to Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.6011-4. Each of
the Acquiror and its Subsidiaries is and has been in material
compliance with all applicable Laws pertaining to Taxes,
including all applicable Laws relating to record retention. Each
of the Acquiror and its Subsidiaries has timely paid all Taxes
it is required to have paid and has adequately provided for all
Taxes for which it is required to provide.
Section 4.12 Material
Contracts. Except as would not reasonably be
expected to have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect, each
Acquiror Material Contract is a legal, valid, binding and
enforceable agreement and is in full force and effect, except as
the same may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium or similar Law now or hereafter in
effect relating to creditors rights generally and subject
to general principles of equity. None of the Acquiror or any of
its Subsidiaries or, to the knowledge of the Acquiror, any other
party, is in breach or violation of, or (with or without notice
or lapse of time or both) default under, any Acquiror Material
Contract, nor has the Acquiror or any of its Subsidiaries
received any notice or claim of any such breach, violation or
default or any other dispute relating the any Acquiror Material
Contract.
Section 4.13 Accuracy
of Information Furnished; Disclosure. The
information supplied by the Acquiror for inclusion in the Joint
Proxy Statement or other information included in any information
statement or proxy statement relating to the Acquiror
Shareholders Meeting, will not, at the time it is mailed to the
Acquiror Shareholders and Company Shareholders, respectively,
contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein not false or misleading at
the time and in the light of the circumstances under which such
statements are made.
A-44
Section 4.14 Brokers. Except
for Avondale Partners, no broker, finder or investment banker is
entitled to any brokerage, finders or other fee or
commission in connection with the transactions contemplated
hereby based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of the
Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger Sub.
ARTICLE V
COVENANTS
Section 5.1 Conduct
of Business of the Company and its Subsidiaries Prior to the
Closing. Between the date of this Agreement
and the Closing Date, unless the Acquiror shall otherwise agree
in writing, the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries
shall be conducted only in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice; and the Company shall, and shall
cause each of its Subsidiaries to, preserve substantially intact
the business organization and assets of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, pay the debts and Taxes of the Company when due,
use its commercially reasonable efforts to keep available the
services of the current officers, Employees and consultants of
the Company and its Subsidiaries and use commercially reasonable
efforts to preserve the current relationships of the Company and
its Subsidiaries with customers, suppliers and other persons
with which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has
significant business relations, all with the goal of preserving
unimpaired the goodwill and ongoing businesses of the Company at
the Effective Time. The Company shall promptly notify Acquiror
of (i) any event or occurrence or emergency not in the
ordinary course of business of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, (ii) any material event involving the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries or (iii) any event or action
that has decreased or could reasonably be expected to materially
decrease the value of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
that arises during the period from the date of this Agreement
and continuing until the earlier of the termination of this
Agreement or the Effective Time. By way of amplification and not
limitation, between the date of this Agreement and the Closing
Date, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement and
subject to Section 5.3, neither the Company nor any
of its Subsidiaries shall do, or propose to do, directly or
indirectly, any of the following without the prior written
consent of the Acquiror:
(a) amend or otherwise change its articles of incorporation
or bylaws or equivalent organizational documents;
(b) issue, sell, pledge, dispose of or otherwise subject to
any Encumbrance (i) any shares of capital stock of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or any options, warrants,
convertible securities or other rights of any kind to acquire
any such shares, or any other ownership interest in the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries, other than the issuance of shares of
Company Common Stock upon the exercise of Company Options or
Company Warrants outstanding on the date hereof in accordance
with their current terms, or (ii) any properties or assets
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, other than sales or
transfers of inventory or accounts receivable in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice;
(c) declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise, or
make any other payment on or with respect to any of its capital
stock, except for dividends by any direct or indirect wholly
owned Subsidiary of the Company to the Company;
(d) reclassify, combine, split, subdivide or redeem, or
purchase or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of
its capital stock or make any other change with respect to its
capital structure;
(e) acquire any corporation, partnership, limited liability
company, other business organization or division thereof or any
material amount of assets, or enter into any joint venture,
strategic alliance, exclusive dealing, non-competition or
similar Contract or arrangement;
(f) except for the First-Step Merger and the Second-Step
Merger, adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation,
dissolution, merger, consolidation, restructuring,
recapitalization or other reorganization of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries, or otherwise alter the Companys or a
Subsidiarys corporate structure;
(g) incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or issue any
debt securities or assume, guarantee or endorse, or otherwise
become responsible for, the obligations of any Person, or make
any loans or advances, except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice; provided, that in no event
shall the
A-45
Company or any of its Subsidiaries (i) incur, assume or
guarantee any long-term indebtedness for borrowed money or
(ii) make any optional repayment of any indebtedness for
borrowed money;
(h) (i) amend, waive, modify or consent to the
termination of any Company Material Contract, or amend, waive,
modify or consent to the termination of the Companys or
any of its Subsidiaries rights thereunder,
(ii) except for any sales Contracts with customers entered
into in the ordinary course of business, undertake any
expenditure, transaction or commitment, or any commitment or
transaction of the type described in Section 3.21,
exceeding $25,000 individually or $50,000 in the aggregate, or
(iii) enter into any Contract other than in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice;
(i) authorize, or make any commitment with respect to, any
capital expenditure, except for such capital expenditures that
do not, individually or in the aggregate, exceed $25,000;
(j) enter into any lease of real or personal property or
any renewals thereof involving a term of more than one year or
rental obligation exceeding $25,000 per year in any single case;
(k) increase the compensation payable or to become payable
or the benefits provided to its directors, officers or Employees
(except for (i) normal merit and cost-of-living increases
consistent with past practice in salaries or wages of employees
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries who are not directors
or officers of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and who
receive less than $100,000 in total annual cash compensation
from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and
(ii) payments of annual bonuses for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2008 as described in Schedule 3.31 of
the Company Disclosure Schedules), or grant any severance or
termination payment to, or loan or advance any amount to, any
director, officer or Employee of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, or establish, adopt, enter into or amend any Plan;
(l) enter into any Contract with any Related Party of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, other than as contemplated
by this Agreement;
(m) make any change in any method of accounting or
accounting practice or policy, except as required by GAAP;
(n) make, revoke or modify any Tax election, settle or
compromise any Tax liability or file any Return other than on a
basis consistent with past practice;
(o) pay, discharge or satisfy any claim, liability or
obligation (absolute, accrued, asserted or unasserted,
contingent or otherwise), other than the payment, discharge or
satisfaction, in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, of liabilities reflected or reserved against on
the Company Balance Sheet or subsequently incurred in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(p) cancel, compromise, waive or release any right or claim
other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice;
(q) permit the lapse of any existing policy of insurance
relating to the business or assets of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, except by reason of replacement;
(r) permit the lapse of any right relating to Intellectual
Property or any other intangible asset used in and necessary to
the business of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries;
(s) accelerate the collection of or discount any accounts
receivable, delay the payment of accounts payable or defer
expenses, reduce inventories or otherwise increase cash on hand,
except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice;
(t) commence or settle any Action;
(u) take any action, or intentionally fail to take any
action, intended to or that would reasonably be expected by the
Company to cause any representation or warranty made by the
Company in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement to be
untrue in any material respect or result in a breach of any
covenant made by the Company in this Agreement or any Ancillary
Agreement, or that has or would reasonably be expected to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect;
A-46
(v) take any action outside of the ordinary course of
business that would individually or in the aggregate be
reasonably expected to decrease the cash and cash equivalents as
would be required to be shown on the Companys balance
sheet as of the Closing Date to less than $4,500,000; or
(w) announce an intention, enter into any formal or
informal agreement, or otherwise make a commitment to do any of
the foregoing.
Section 5.2 Conduct
of Business of the Acquiror Prior to the
Closing. Between the date of this Agreement
and the earlier of the Closing Date and the termination of this
Agreement, (a) the Acquiror shall, and shall cause each of
its Subsidiaries to, use commercially reasonable efforts: to
preserve substantially intact the business organization and
assets of the Acquiror and its Subsidiaries, to pay the debts
and Taxes of the Acquiror when due, to keep available the
services of the current officers, employees and consultants of
the Acquiror and its Subsidiaries, and to preserve the current
relationships of the Acquiror and its Subsidiaries with
customers, suppliers and other persons with which the Acquiror
or any of its Subsidiaries has significant business relations,
all with the goal of preserving unimpaired the goodwill and
ongoing businesses of the Acquiror at the Effective Time and
(b) except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement and
subject to Section 5.3, neither the Acquiror nor any
of its Subsidiaries shall do, directly or indirectly, any of the
following without the prior written consent of the Company:
(a) amend or otherwise change its articles of incorporation
or bylaws or equivalent organizational documents;
(b) issue, sell, pledge or dispose of, or grant any
options, warrants, convertible securities or other rights to
acquire, in any individual transaction or series of related
transactions, (i) more than 5% of the currently outstanding
shares of Acquiror Common Stock or (ii) all or
substantially all of the properties or assets of the Acquiror or
any of its Subsidiaries, other than (A) sales or transfers
of inventory or accounts receivable in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, (B) sales or
transfers of assets that are not material to the Acquirors
business;
(c) declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise, or
make any other payment on or with respect to any of its capital
stock, except for (i) dividends by any direct or indirect
wholly owned Subsidiary of the Acquiror to the Acquiror or
another wholly owned Subsidiary of the Acquiror or
(ii) capital contributions from the Acquiror to any direct
or indirect wholly owned Subsidiary of the Acquiror or from a
Subsidiary of the Acquiror to another Subsidiary of the Acquiror;
(d) reclassify, combine, split, subdivide or redeem, or
purchase or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of
its capital stock or make any other change with respect to its
capital structure;
(e) acquire any corporation, partnership, limited liability
company, other business organization or division thereof or any
material amount of assets, or enter into any joint venture,
strategic alliance, exclusive dealing, non-competition or
similar Contract or arrangement, in each such case with a
transaction cost to the Acquiror in excess of $5,000,000, except
for passive investments and cash management consistent with past
practice;
(f) except for the First-Step Merger and the Second-Step
Merger or any transaction described in
Section 5.2(e) (disregarding the transaction value),
adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution,
merger, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other
reorganization of the Acquiror or any of its Subsidiaries, or
otherwise alter in any material respect the Acquirors or a
Subsidiarys corporate structure, other than with respect
to any immaterial or inactive Subsidiary;
(g) incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or issue any
debt securities or assume, guarantee or endorse, the obligations
of any Person, or make any loans or advances, in each such case
in excess of $1,000,000, except in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice;
(h) take any action, or intentionally fail to take any
action, intended to or that would reasonably be expected by the
Acquiror to cause any representation or warranty made by the
Acquiror in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement to be
untrue in any material respect or result in a breach of any
covenant made by the Acquiror in this Agreement or any Ancillary
Agreement, or that has or would reasonably be expected to have
an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect; or
A-47
(i) announce an intention, enter into any formal or
informal agreement, or otherwise make a commitment to do any of
the foregoing.
Section 5.3 Exclusivity.
(a) Immediately following the execution of and delivery of
this Agreement, each of the Company and the Acquiror, and each
of their respective Subsidiaries, shall immediately cease any
and all existing activities, discussions, or negotiations with
any Person conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition
Proposal relating to the Company and the Acquiror, respectively.
(b) At all times during the period commencing with the
execution and delivery of this Agreement, and continuing until
the earlier to occur of the termination of this Agreement
pursuant to Article VIII and the Effective Time,
neither the Company, nor the Acquiror, shall (nor shall their
respective Representatives or Affiliates), directly or
indirectly, take any of the following actions with any party
other than the other party hereto and its designees:
(i) solicit, encourage, seek, entertain, support, assist,
initiate or participate in any inquiry, negotiations or
discussions, or enter into any agreement, with respect to any
Acquisition Proposal, (ii) disclose or furnish any
information in connection with an Acquisition Proposal
concerning the business, technologies or properties of either
the Company or the Acquiror, or any of their respective
Subsidiaries, or afford to any Person access to its properties,
technologies, books or records, in connection with an
Acquisition Proposal, (iii) approve, endorse or recommend
an Acquisition Proposal relating to the Company or the Acquiror,
respectively; (iv) enter into any letter of intent,
memorandum of understanding or other Contract contemplating or
otherwise relating to an Acquisition Proposal relating to the
Company or the Acquiror, respectively; or (v) terminate,
amend or waive any rights under any standstill or
other similar Contract between it or any of its Subsidiaries and
any Person (other than the other party hereto); provided
that:
(i) notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to
obtaining the Acquiror Shareholder Approval the Acquiror may,
directly or indirectly through advisors, agents or other
intermediaries, subject to compliance with the provisions of
this Section 5.3, (A) engage or participate in
discussions or negotiations with any Person that has made (and
not withdrawn) a bona fide Acquisition Proposal for the Acquiror
in writing that the Acquiror Board reasonably determines in good
faith would not require the Acquiror to forego the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated hereby or constitutes or is
reasonably likely to lead to an Acquiror Superior Proposal,
and/or
(B) furnish to any Person that has made (and not withdrawn)
a bona fide Acquisition Proposal for the Acquiror in writing
that the Acquiror Board reasonably determines in good faith
would not require the Acquiror to forego the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated hereby or (after consultation
with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel)
constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to an Acquiror
Superior Proposal, non-public information relating to Acquiror
or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to a confidentiality
agreement the terms of which are no less favorable to Acquiror
than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement,
provided further, that, in the case of any action taken
pursuant to the foregoing clauses (A) or (B), (x) the
Acquiror Board reasonably determines in good faith (after
consultation with outside legal counsel) that the failure to
take such action would reasonably be expected to be a breach of
its fiduciary duties under the DGCL, (y) at least one
(1) Business Day prior to engaging or participating in any
such discussions or negotiations with, or furnishing any
non-public information to, such Person, the Acquiror gives the
Company written notice of the identity of such Person and the
material terms and conditions of such Acquisition Proposal and
of the Acquirors intention to engage or participate in
discussions or negotiations with, or furnish non-public
information to, such Person, and (z) contemporaneously with
furnishing any non-public information to such Person, the
Acquiror furnishes such non-public information to the Company
(to the extent such information has not been previously
furnished to the Company); and
(ii) notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to
obtaining the Company Shareholder Approval the Company may,
directly or indirectly through advisors, agents or other
intermediaries, subject to compliance with the provisions of
this Section 5.3, (A) engage or participate in
discussions or negotiations with any Person that has made (and
not withdrawn) a bona fide Acquisition Proposal for the Company
in writing that the Company Board reasonably determines in good
faith constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a Company
Superior Proposal,
and/or
(B) furnish to any Person that has made (and not withdrawn)
a bona fide Acquisition Proposal for the Company in writing that
the Company Board reasonably determines in good faith (after
A-48
consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal
counsel) constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a
Company Superior Proposal, non-public information relating to
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to a
confidentiality agreement the terms of which are no less
favorable to the Company than those contained in the
Confidentiality Agreement, provided further, that, in the
case of any action taken pursuant to the foregoing
clauses (A) or (B), (x) the Company Board reasonably
determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal
counsel) that the failure to take such action would reasonably
be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties under the Cal
Code, (y) at least one (1) Business Day prior to
engaging or participating in any such discussions or
negotiations with, or furnishing any non-public information to,
such Person, the Company gives the Acquiror written notice of
the identity of such Person and the material terms and
conditions of such Acquisition Proposal (unless such Acquisition
Proposal is in written form, in which case the Company shall
give the Acquiror a copy of all written materials comprising or
relating thereto) and of the Companys intention to engage
or participate in discussions or negotiations with, or furnish
non-public information to, such Person, and
(z) contemporaneously with furnishing any non-public
information to such Person, the Company furnishes such
non-public information to the Acquiror (to the extent such
information has not been previously furnished to the Acquiror).
(c) In addition to the obligations of the Company and the
Acquiror set forth in Section 5.3(a) and
Section 5.3(b), and subject to the terms of the
Confidentiality Agreement, each of the Company and the Acquiror
shall promptly, and in all cases within twenty four
(24) hours of its receipt, advise the other party hereto
orally and in writing of (i) any Acquisition Proposal it
receives or (ii) any request for information it receives
that would reasonably be expected to lead to an Acquisition
Proposal or (iii) any inquiry it receives with respect to,
or which would reasonably be expected to lead to, any
Acquisition Proposal, the material terms and conditions of such
Acquisition Proposal, request or inquiry (including copies of
all written materials comprising or relating thereto), and the
identity of the Person or group making any such Acquisition
Proposal, request or inquiry.
(d) Each party shall keep the other party reasonably
informed on a current basis of the status of any discussions
with respect to any Acquisition Proposal and the material terms
and conditions (including all amendments or proposed amendments)
of any Acquisition Proposal, request or inquiry it receives. In
addition to the foregoing, each party shall provide the other
party hereto with at least three (3) Business Days written
notice of a meeting of its board of directors (or any committee
thereof) at which its board of directors (or any committee
thereof) is reasonably expected to consider an Acquisition
Proposal it has received.
Section 5.4 S-4
Registration Statement.
(a) As soon as practicable following the date of this
Agreement, the Company and the Acquiror shall prepare and file
with the SEC the Joint Proxy Statement and the Acquiror shall
prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-4
with respect to the Acquiror Common Stock and Acquiror Warrants
to be issued in connection with the Merger or in connection with
the exercise of any Acquiror Warrant (together with any
amendment or supplement thereto, the
Form S-4),
in which the Joint Proxy Statement will be included as a
prospectus, and any other documents required by the Securities
Act or the Exchange Act in connection with the Merger. The
Company shall reasonably promptly furnish to the Acquiror all
information concerning the Company and the Company Shareholders
that may be required or reasonably requested in connection with
any action contemplated by this Section 5.4
(including, without limitation, the audited financial statements
of the Company for the three fiscal years ended
November 30, 2008 complying with the requirements of the
Securities Act and the Exchange Act). In addition, the Company
shall promptly furnish to the Acquiror all information
concerning the Company, its Subsidiaries and the Company
Shareholders that may be required or reasonably requested in
connection with any pre- or post-effective amendment to the
Form S-4
and shall use its diligence efforts to cause its independent
auditors to promptly provide all Consents for the inclusion of
the audited financial statements of the Company and the report
thereon of the Companys independent auditors in the
reports, registration statements, or filings of the Acquiror
filed or to be filed with the SEC. Each of the Company and
Acquiror shall use commercially reasonable efforts to have the
Form S-4
declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as
practicable after such filing. The Company shall use
commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Joint Proxy
Statement to be mailed to the Company Shareholder, and the
Acquiror shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the
Joint Proxy Statement to be mailed to the Acquiror
Shareholders, in each case as soon as reasonably practicable
after the
Form S-4
is declared effective under the Securities Act. No filing of, or
amendment or supplement to, the
Form S-4
A-49
will be made by the Acquiror, and no filing of, or amendment or
supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement will be made by the
Company or the Acquiror, in each case, without providing the
other party and its respective counsel a reasonable opportunity
(subject to applicable Law and the time requirements) to review
and comment thereon and giving due consideration to such
comments. The parties shall notify each other promptly of the
receipt of any comments from the SEC or its staff and any
request by the SEC or its staff for amendments or supplements to
the Joint Proxy Statement or the
Form S-4
or for additional information and shall supply each other with
copies of all correspondence between such party or any of its
Representatives or Affiliates, on the one hand, and the SEC or
its staff on the other hand, with respect to the Joint Proxy
Statement, the
Form S-4
or the Merger. Acquiror will advise the Company, promptly after
it receives notice thereof, of the time when the
Form S-4
has become effective, the issuance of any stop order or the
suspension of the qualification of the Acquiror Common Stock
issuable in connection with the Merger for offering or sale in
any jurisdiction. If at any time prior to the Effective Time any
information relating to the Company or the Acquiror, or any of
their respective Affiliates, Subsidiaries, Employees, officers
or directors, should be discovered by the Company or the
Acquiror which should be set forth in an amendment or supplement
to the
Form S-4
or the Joint Proxy Statement so that any of such documents would
not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading, the party that discovers such information shall
promptly notify the other parties hereto and an appropriate
amendment or supplement describing such information shall be
filed with the SEC as soon as reasonably practicable and, to the
extent required by applicable Law, disseminated to the
shareholders of each of the Company and the Acquiror. The
parties acknowledge and agree that the foregoing arrangements
may be altered by the Acquiror as Acquiror deems necessary to
respond to any comments or requests from the SEC.
(b) Prior to the Effective Time, the Acquiror shall use
commercially reasonable efforts to make all required filings
with state regulatory authorities and Nasdaq and to cause the
Acquiror Common Stock and Acquiror Warrants to be issued in the
Merger or in connection with the exercise of any Acquiror
Warrant to qualify under the securities or blue sky
Law of every jurisdiction of the United States in which any
registered Company Shareholder has an address of record on the
record date for determining the shareholders entitled to notice
of and to vote on the Merger (other than qualifying to do
business in a State in which it is not now qualified), and the
Company shall furnish all information concerning the Company,
its Subsidiaries and the Company Shareholders as the Acquiror
may request in connection with any such action.
Section 5.5 Shareholder
Meetings.
(a) Company Shareholders Meeting.
(i) As soon as reasonably practicable following the date
the
Form S-4
becomes effective, but in any event within five
(5) Business Days, the Company shall take all action
necessary in accordance with the Cal Code and the Companys
articles of incorporation and bylaws to duly call and give
notice of the meeting of Company Shareholders to be held in
connection with the Merger (the Company Shareholders
Meeting) for Company Shareholders to consider and vote
upon the adoption and approval of this Agreement, the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated hereby and by the Ancillary
Agreement, and the Company shall take all action necessary in
accordance with the Cal Code and the Companys articles of
incorporation and bylaws to convene and hold such Company
Shareholders Meeting as soon as reasonably practicable
following the giving of such notice, but in any event within 30
calendar days thereafter.
(ii) The Company shall (A) through the Company Board,
unanimously recommend to Company Shareholders the approval and
adoption of this Agreement, the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby and by the Ancillary Agreements
(the Company Board Recommendation),
(B) use its commercially reasonable efforts to solicit and
obtain the Company Shareholder Approval and satisfy the
condition set forth in Section 7.3(l), and
(C) include the Company Board Recommendation in the Joint
Proxy Statement.
(iii) The Company agrees that its obligations pursuant to
Section 5.5(a)(i) shall not be affected by any Board
Recommendation Change or any Acquisition Proposal. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, nothing set forth in
this Section 5.5 relieves the Company of its
obligation to submit this Agreement and the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby and by the Ancillary Agreements
to a vote of the Company Shareholders at the Company
Shareholders Meeting.
A-50
(iv) The Company shall provide the Acquiror with the
Company Shareholders list as and when requested by the
Acquiror, including at any time and from time to time following
any Board Recommendation Change.
(v) Nothing in this Section 5.5(a) shall be
deemed to require the Company to waive any condition to closing
set forth in Section 7.1 or Section 7.2
hereof or to restrict the Companys right to terminate this
Agreement in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
(b) Acquiror Shareholders Meeting.
(i) As soon as reasonably practicable following the date
the
Form S-4
becomes effective, but in any event within five
(5) Business Days, the Acquiror shall take all action
necessary in accordance with the DGCL and the Acquirors
certificate of incorporation and bylaws to duly call and give
notice of the Acquiror shareholders meeting (including any
adjournments or postponements thereof as Acquiror may deem
necessary, the Acquiror Shareholders Meeting)
for Acquiror Shareholders to consider and vote upon the adoption
and approval of this Agreement, the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby and by the Ancillary Agreement,
and the Acquiror shall take all action necessary in accordance
with the DGCL and the Acquirors articles of incorporation
and bylaws to convene and hold such Acquiror Shareholders
Meeting as soon as reasonably practicable following the giving
of such notice, but in any event within 50 calendar days
thereafter, excluding any adjournments or postponements thereof
as Acquiror may deem necessary.
(ii) The Acquiror shall (A) through the Acquiror
Board, unanimously recommend to Acquiror Shareholders the
approval and adoption of this Agreement, the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated hereby and by the Ancillary
Agreement (the Acquiror Board
Recommendation), (B) use its commercially
reasonable efforts to solicit and obtain the Acquiror
Shareholder Approval, and (C) include the Acquiror Board
Recommendation in the Joint Proxy Statement.
(iii) Nothing in this Section 5.5(b) shall be
deemed to require the Acquiror to waive any condition to closing
set forth in Section 7.1 or Section 7.3 hereof or to
restrict the Acquirors right to terminate this Agreement
in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
(c) Board Recommendation
Change. Subject to the terms of this
Section 5.5(c), neither the Company Board nor the
Acquiror Board nor any committee thereof shall change, withhold,
withdraw, amend, modify, qualify or condition in a manner
adverse to the other party, or publicly propose to withhold,
withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to the other
party, the Company Board Recommendation or the Acquiror Board
Recommendation (a Board Recommendation
Change); provided, however, that:
(i) notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to
obtaining the Company Shareholder Approval, the Company may
effect a Board Recommendation Change, if (A) the Company
has received an Acquisition Proposal relating to it that
constitutes a Company Superior Proposal, (B) prior to
effecting such Board Recommendation Change, the Company shall
have given the Acquiror at least five (5) Business Days
notice thereof, which notice shall include the most current
terms of such Company Superior Proposal and the identity of the
Person making such Company Superior Proposal and the opportunity
to meet to discuss in good faith a modification of the terms and
conditions of this Agreement so that the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby may be effected, (C) the
Acquiror shall not have made, within three (3) Business
Days after receipt of the written notice of the Companys
intention to effect a Board Recommendation Change, a
counter-offer or proposal that is at least as favorable to the
Company Shareholders as such Company Superior Proposal and
(D) after such discussions, the Company Board reasonably
determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal
counsel and after considering in good faith any counter-offer or
proposal made by the Acquiror pursuant to the immediately
preceding clause) that the failure to effect such Board
Recommendation Change would be reasonably likely to result in a
breach of its fiduciary duties under the Cal Code; and
(ii) notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to
obtaining the Acquiror Shareholder Approval, the Acquiror may
effect a Board Recommendation Change, if (A) the Acquiror
has received an Acquisition Proposal relating to it that
constitutes an Acquiror Superior Proposal, (B) prior to
effecting such Board Recommendation Change, the Acquiror shall
have given the Company at least five (5) Business Days
notice thereof, which notice shall include the most current
terms of such Acquiror Superior Proposal and the identity
A-51
of the Person making such Acquiror Superior Proposal and the
opportunity to meet to discuss in good faith a modification of
the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated hereby may be effected,
and (C) after such discussions, the Acquiror Board
reasonably determines in good faith (after consultation with
outside legal counsel) that the failure to effect such Board
Recommendation Change would be reasonably likely to result in a
breach of its fiduciary duties under the DGCL.
(d) Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit the Acquiror
Board from (i) taking and disclosing to the Acquiror
Shareholders a position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2(a)
under the Exchange Act or (ii) complying with the
provisions of
Rule 14d-9
promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Section 5.6 Access
to Information. From the date hereof until
the Closing Date, each of the Company and the Acquiror shall
(i) provide the other party and their respective
Representatives complete access (including for inspection and
copying) at all reasonable times to the properties, offices,
plants and other facilities, books and records of the such party
and its Affiliates and Subsidiaries, (ii) furnish the other
party and their respective Representatives such financial,
operating and other data and other information on the business
and properties of such party and its Affiliates and Subsidiaries
as may be reasonably requested from time to time,
(iii) instruct its Employees, Representatives, Affiliates
and Subsidiaries (and the Employees, Representatives, Affiliates
of any Subsidiary or Affiliate) to cooperate in good faith with
the other party and their respective Representatives, and
(iv) subject to restrictions imposed by applicable Law, if
any, allow the other party and their respective Representatives
to make all extracts and copies of the books and records of the
such party and its Affiliates and Subsidiaries as may be
reasonably requested from time to time; provided,
however, that no information discovered through the
access afforded by this Section 5.6 shall
(x) limit or otherwise affect any remedies available to the
party receiving such access, or (y) be deemed to amend or
supplement the Disclosure Schedules of the disclosing party or
prevent or cure any misrepresentations, breach of representation
or warranty or breach of covenant.
Section 5.7 Notification
of Certain Matters; Supplements to Disclosure Schedules.
(a) The Company and the Acquiror shall give prompt written
notice to the other party of (i) the occurrence or
non-occurrence of any change, condition or event the occurrence
or non-occurrence of which would render any of its respective
representations or warranties contained in this Agreement or any
Ancillary Agreement, if made on or immediately following the
date of such event, untrue or inaccurate in any material
respect, (ii) the occurrence of any change, condition or
event that has had or could reasonably likely have a Company
Material Adverse Effect or Acquiror Material Adverse Effect, as
applicable, (iii) any failure of the Company or the
Acquiror or any of their respective Subsidiaries or Affiliates
or Representatives to comply with or satisfy any covenant or
agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it hereunder or
any event or condition that would otherwise result in the
non-fulfillment of any of the conditions to the other
partys obligations hereunder, (iv) any notice or
other communication from any Person alleging that the Consent of
such Person is or may be required in connection with the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
or the Ancillary Agreements, or (v) any Action pending or,
to the knowledge of such party, threatened against a party or
the parties relating to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements; provided,
however, that the delivery of any notice pursuant to this
Section 5.7 shall not (x) limit or otherwise
affect any remedies available to the party receiving such notice
or (y) be deemed to amend or supplement the Disclosure
Schedules of the disclosing party or prevent or cure any
misrepresentations, breach of representation or warranty or
breach of covenant.
(b) Each party shall from time to time supplement the
information set forth on its respective Disclosure Schedules
with respect to any matter now existing or hereafter arising
that, if existing or occurring at or prior to the date of this
Agreement, would have been required to be set forth or described
in such Disclosure Schedules or that is necessary to correct any
information in such Disclosure Schedules or in any
representation or warranty of such party which has been rendered
inaccurate thereby promptly following discovery thereof;
provided, however, that no such supplement shall
be deemed to cure any breach of any representation, warranty or
covenant made in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement or
have any effect for purposes of determining the satisfaction of
the conditions set forth in Sections 7.2 or
7.3, the compliance by the Company or the Acquiror, as
applicable, with any covenant set forth herein.
A-52
Section 5.8 Spreadsheet. The
Company shall deliver to the Acquiror a spreadsheet (the
Spreadsheet) substantially in the form
attached hereto as Schedule 5.8, which spreadsheet
shall be certified as complete and correct by the chief
executive officer and chief financial officer of the Company as
of the Effective Time and which shall include, among other
things, as of immediately prior to the Effective Time,
(a) all Company Shareholders and their respective
addresses, indicating whether such holder is an Employee, the
number of shares of Company Common Stock held by such Company
Shareholder (including the respective certificate numbers of
Company Common Stock), the aggregate Merger Consideration Per
Share payable to each Company Shareholder, and such other
information relevant thereto or which the Acquiror may
reasonably request, and (b) all holders of Company Warrants
and their respective addresses, whether each such holder is an
employee, the number of shares of Company Common Stock
underlying each such Company Warrant, the grant dates of such
Company Warrants, the exercise price of such Company Warrants
and such other information relevant thereto or which the
Acquiror may reasonably request. The Company shall deliver a
preliminary Spreadsheet to the Acquiror at least five
(5) Business Days prior to the Closing Date, and shall
deliver a definitive, final Spreadsheet to the Acquiror at least
one (1) Business Day prior to the Closing Date.
Section 5.9 Takeover
Statutes. If any state takeover statute or
similar Law shall become applicable to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements, the
Company and the Company Board shall grant such approvals and
take such actions as are necessary so that the transactions
contemplated hereby or thereby may be consummated as promptly as
practicable on the terms contemplated hereby or thereby and
otherwise act to eliminate the effects of such statute or
regulation on the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby.
Section 5.10 Stock
Option Plans; Additional Director Warrants; Employee Benefit
Plans. Prior to the Effective Time, the
Company shall take all actions necessary to ensure that
(a) all Company Option Plans and all other option or other
equity-based plans and all Company Options shall terminate as of
the Effective Time and (b) after the Effective Time, the
Company is not bound by any Company Option, Company Option Plan
or other equity-based or other right issued by the Company or
any Subsidiary that would entitle any Person, other than the
Acquiror or its Affiliates, to beneficially own, or receive any
payments other than as contemplated in Article II in
respect of, any capital stock or any other security of the
Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, the Interim Surviving
Corporation or the Final Surviving Entity. After the Effective
Time, (i) the Acquiror, in the ordinary course of its
employee compensation process and with input and approval from
Larry Midland, will make appropriate grants of employee stock
options under the Acquiror Option Plans to employees of the
Company consistent with stock grants made to similarly situated
employees of Acquiror, and (ii) in exchange for their
service to the Company during 2008, the Acquiror will grant to
each of the Company directors listed on
Schedule 5.10 an Acquiror Warrant to purchase up to
the number of shares of Acquiror into which 3,000 shares of
Company Common Stock would convert at the Effective Time based
on the Conversion Ratio, at an exercise price of $3.00 per share
of Acquiror Common Stock, which Acquiror Warrants will be
evidenced by and subject to the terms and conditions of the
Warrant Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit G. In addition, between the date of this
Agreement and the Closing Date, the Company and the Acquiror
will cooperate in good faith to determine which Plans of the
Company and its Subsidiaries shall continue in effect after the
Effective Time and whether any such Plan should be amended in
any respect.
Section 5.11 Confidentiality. Each
of the parties shall hold, and shall cause its respective
Subsidiaries, Affiliates and Representatives to hold, in
confidence all documents and information furnished to it by or
on behalf of any other party to this Agreement in connection
with the transactions contemplated hereby or by any Ancillary
Agreement pursuant to the terms of the confidentiality agreement
dated July 8, 2008 between the Acquiror and the Company
(the Confidentiality Agreement), which shall
continue in full force and effect until the Closing Date. If for
any reason this Agreement is terminated prior to the Closing
Date, the Confidentiality Agreement shall nonetheless continue
in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Company
acknowledges that the Acquiror Common Stock is publicly traded
and that any information obtained by the Company, its
Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any of their respective
Representatives during the course of its due diligence could be
considered to be material non-public information within the
meaning of federal and state securities Laws. Accordingly, the
Company acknowledges and agrees not to (and the Company will
cause its Subsidiaries not to and will inform its Affiliates and
Representatives not to) engage in any discussions or
A-53
correspondence relating to, or transactions in, the Acquiror
Common Stock in violation of applicable securities Laws.
Section 5.12 Public
Announcements. Neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries, Affiliates and Representatives shall issue any
statement or communication to any third Person (other than its
Representatives that are bound by confidentiality restrictions)
regarding the subject matter of this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby, including, if applicable, the
termination of this Agreement and the reasons therefor, without
first consulting the Acquiror, except to the extent the Company
reasonably determines is required under applicable Law. Neither
the Acquiror not any of its Subsidiaries, Affiliates and
Representatives shall issue any statement or communication to
any third Person (other than its Representatives that are bound
by confidentiality restrictions) regarding the subject matter of
this Agreement and the reasons therefor, without first
consulting the Company, except to the extent the Acquiror
reasonably determines is required under applicable Law, the
Acquirors obligation to comply with applicable securities
Laws, or the rules of Nasdaq.
Section 5.13 Commercially
Reasonable Efforts. Each of the parties
hereto shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to take, or
cause to be taken, all appropriate action to do, or cause to be
done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable
Law or otherwise to consummate and make effective the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Ancillary
Agreements as promptly as practicable, including to
(a) obtain from Governmental Authorities and other Persons
all Consents and Permits as are necessary for the consummation
by such party of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
and the Ancillary Agreements or for which such party (or any of
its Subsidiaries or Affiliates) is otherwise responsible,
including, without limitation, any required Consents under any
Contract to which such party (or any of its Subsidiaries or
Affiliates) is a party or is bound in a form reasonably
acceptable to the other party, (b) promptly make all
necessary filings, and thereafter make any other required
submissions, with respect to this Agreement and the Ancillary
Agreements required to be made by such party (or any of its
Subsidiaries or Affiliates) under any applicable Law and
(c) have vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any order,
decree, ruling, judgment, injunction or other Action (whether
temporary, preliminary or permanent) to which such party (or any
of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates) is subject that is in effect
and that enjoins, restrains, conditions, makes illegal or
otherwise restricts or prohibits the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any of the
Ancillary Agreements. In furtherance and not in limitation of
the foregoing, the Company shall permit the Acquiror reasonably
to participate in the defense and settlement of any Action or
cause of action relating to this Agreement, the Merger or the
other transactions contemplated hereby or by any of the
Ancillary Agreements, and the Company shall not settle or
compromise any such Action or cause of action without the
Acquirors written consent. Notwithstanding anything herein
to the contrary, no party shall be required by this
Section 5.13 to take or agree to undertake any
action, including entering into any consent decree, hold
separate order or other arrangement, that would (i) require
the divestiture of any of it assets (or in the case of the
Acquiror, any of the assets of the Company) or any of the assets
of its respective Subsidiaries or Affiliates or (ii) limit
its freedom of action with respect to, or its ability to
consolidate and control, any of its assets or businesses (or in
the case of the Acquiror, any of the assets or businesses of the
Company), or the assets or businesses of its respective
Subsidiaries or Affiliates.
Section 5.14 Indemnification;
Directors and Officers Insurance.
(a) From and after the Closing Date until the third (3rd)
anniversary thereof and, to the extent of coverage under the
D&O Policy (as defined below), for three
(3) additional years thereafter, the Interim Surviving
Corporation or the Final Surviving Entity, as applicable (each,
an Indemnifying Party) shall, (i) to the
maximum extent permitted under applicable Law, indemnify and
hold harmless the directors and officers of the Company and its
Subsidiaries serving as of the date of this Agreement (each, an
Indemnified Party) from and against all costs
and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees),
judgments, losses, claims, damages, liabilities and settlement
amounts (paid with the Acquirors prior written consent),
in each case, to the extent actually and reasonably incurred and
arising from any claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation pertaining to the fact that such individual is or
was a director or officer of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, whether pending, asserted, claimed or threatened
prior to or at (but only to the extent disclosed to the Acquiror
on or prior to the Closing Date, provided that with respect to
any threatened matter, the Company had knowledge of such matter
on or prior to the Closing Date), or after the Effective Time
(including in respect of acts or omissions in connection with
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby), and
(ii) advance any reasonable and documented expenses
A-54
related thereto, subject to the receipt from the Indemnified
Party of any undertaking to repay any such amounts for which it
is determined that the Indemnified Party was not entitled or as
required under applicable Law. In the event of any such claim,
action, suit, proceeding or investigation, (x) the
Indemnifying Party shall pay the reasonable and documented fees
and expenses of counsel selected by the Indemnified Parties,
which counsel shall be reasonably satisfactory to the
Indemnifying Party, and (y) the Indemnifying Party may
participate in the defense of any such matter; provided,
however, that the Indemnifying Party shall not be liable
for any settlement effected without its prior written consent;
provided further, that neither the Interim Surviving
Corporation nor the Final Surviving Entity shall be obligated
pursuant to this Section 5.14 to pay the fees and
expenses of more than one counsel for all Indemnified Parties in
any single Action unless a conflict of interest precludes the
effective representation of more than one Indemnified Party with
respect to the applicable claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation.
(b) The Interim Surviving Corporation and Final Surviving
Entity, as the case may be, shall maintain in effect for six
(6) years from the Closing Date, if available, the
directors and officers liability insurance policies
maintained by the Company as of the date hereof (the
D&O Policy, a true, correct and complete
copy of which has been heretofore provided to the Acquiror) with
respect to acts or omissions occurring prior to the Closing
Date; provided, however, that the Interim
Surviving Corporation or Final Surviving Entity may
(i) substitute therefor policies of an insurance company
the material terms of which, including coverage and amount, are
substantially similar, in the aggregate, to the Companys
existing policies as of the date hereof or (ii) obtain such
extended reporting period coverage under its existing insurance
programs (to be effective as of the Closing Date); and
provided further, that in no event shall the Final
Surviving Entity be required to pay aggregate premiums for
insurance under this Section 5.14(b) in excess of
$50,000.
(c) The provisions in this Section 5.14 are
intended to be for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by
each of the Indemnified Parties, their heirs and
representatives. In the event the Final Surviving Entity
(i) consolidates with or merges into any other person and
shall not be the continuing or surviving corporation or entity,
or (ii) transfers all or substantially all of its
properties and assets to any person, then, and in each case,
proper provision shall be made so that such successors or
assigns shall succeed to the obligations set forth in this
Section 5.14.
Section 5.15 Tax-Free
Reorganization.
(a) Each of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub,
Second-Step Merger Sub and the Company shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to cause the First-Step Merger
and the Second-Step Merger to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)
of the Tax Code. None of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub,
Second-Step Merger Sub, the Company, or their respective
Subsidiaries shall take, or agree to take, any action (including
any action otherwise permitted by Section 5.15 in
the case of the Company) that could prevent or impede the Merger
from qualifying as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Tax Code.
(b) Unless otherwise required pursuant to a
determination within the meaning of
Section 1313(a) of the Tax Code, each of the Acquiror,
First-Step Merger Sub, Second-Step Merger Sub and the Company
shall report the First-Step Merger and the Second-Step Merger as
a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Tax Code.
(c) The parties hereto shall cooperate and use their
commercially reasonable efforts to deliver to the
Acquirors and the Companys tax counsel and tax
advisors a certificate containing representations reasonably
requested by such counsel
and/or
advisors in connection with the rendering of any tax opinions to
be issued by such counsel
and/or
advisors with respect to the treatment of the Merger as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Tax Code. The Acquirors and the Companys tax counsel
and tax advisors shall be entitled to rely upon such
representations in rendering any such opinions.
Section 5.16 Second-Step
Merger. As soon as reasonably practicable
after the Effective Time and in any event within sixty
(60) days of the Effective Time, the Acquiror shall cause
the Second-Step Merger to be effected by, among other things,
approving the Second-Step Merger as the sole shareholder of the
Interim Surviving Corporation and the Second-Step Merger Sub,
adopting and cause the Interim Surviving Corporation and the
Second-Step Merger Sub to adopt an agreement and plan of merger
pursuant to which the Interim Surviving Corporation shall be
merged with and into the Second-Step Merger Sub with the
Second-Step Merger Sub being the entity surviving the
Second-Step Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror.
There shall be no conditions
A-55
to the Second-Step Merger, other than (a) the consummation
of the Merger and (b) the absence of any legal prohibition
on completing the Second-Step Merger. It is intended that the
Second-Step Merger shall occur as described in this
Section 5.16, and that the First-Step Merger and the
Second-Step Merger together qualify as a reorganization under
the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Tax Code, and that
this Agreement constitute a plan of reorganization
within the meaning of
section 1.368-2(g)
of the regulations promulgated under the Tax Code.
Section 5.17 Internal
Controls and Procedures.
(a) As soon as reasonably practicable after the date of
this Agreement, the Company and the Acquiror will cooperate in
good faith and use commercially reasonable efforts to design,
and the Company and its Subsidiaries will implement, maintain,
adhere to and enforce, a system of internal accounting and
disclosure controls and procedures that are effective in
providing assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements in
accordance with GAAP (including the Financial Statements,
Interim Financial Statements, 2008 Subsidiary Financial
Statements and Interim Subsidiary Financial Statements),
including policies and procedures that (i) require the
maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the Company and its Subsidiaries, (ii) provide assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and
that receipts and expenditures of the Company and its
Subsidiaries are being made only in accordance with appropriate
authorizations of management and the Company Board and
(iii) provide assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries. If reasonably
requested by the Acquiror, the Acquirors independent
auditors, or the Companys independent auditors, the
Company shall hire financial personnel (or allow financial
personnel of Acquiror) to assist with implementing the
foregoing. The identity and terms of such personnels
engagement reasonably shall be subject to the approval of the
Acquiror and the Acquiror shall be responsible for the
compensation paid to any such personnel during the period from
the date of hire until the earlier of the Closing Date and the
termination of this Agreement.
(b) The Company will promptly inform the Acquiror in the
event that the Company, any of its Subsidiaries, any of the
officers, directors or Employees of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or the Companys independent auditors
identifies or becomes aware of (i) any significant
deficiency or material weakness in the system of internal
accounting controls utilized by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves the management or other Employees of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries who have a role in the preparation of
financial statements or the internal accounting controls
utilized by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or
(iii) any claim or allegation regarding any of the
foregoing. The Company will cause its officers and directors, in
cooperation with the Acquiror, to evaluate the effectiveness of
such internal controls in order to determine whether or not
there exist any significant deficiencies in the design or
operation that could adversely affect the Companys or any
of its Subsidiaries ability to record, process, summarize,
and report financial data after the Closing.
Section 5.18 FIRPTA
Compliance. On the Closing Date, the Company
shall deliver to the Acquiror a properly executed statement (a
FIRPTA Compliance Certificate) in a form
reasonably acceptable to the Acquiror for purposes of satisfying
the Acquirors obligations under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1445 2(c)(3).
Section 5.19 Employee
Invention Agreements. Between the date of
this Agreement and the Closing Date, the Company shall use its
reasonable efforts to, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to use
their reasonable efforts to, enter into written agreements
between the Company or such Subsidiary and each current and
former director, officer, management Employee or technical and
professional Employee, which provide that such director,
officer, or Employee will maintain in confidence all
confidential or proprietary information acquired by them in the
course of their employment with the Company or a Subsidiary, and
to assign to the Company or such Subsidiary all inventions made
by them within the scope of their employment during such
employment and for a reasonable period thereafter (collectively,
the Employee Invention Agreements). Promptly
after entering into each such Employee Invention Agreement, the
Company shall provide a true, correct and complete copy of each
fully executed agreement to the Acquiror.
Section 5.20 Business
Plan. Both the Company and the Acquiror will
cooperate in good faith to develop a post-closing business plan
for the operation of the Final Surviving Entity;
A-56
provided that the development of any such plan shall not
be a condition to either partys obligations under this
Agreement.
Section 5.21 2008
Financial Statements. As soon as reasonably
practicable after the date of this Agreement, and in any event
within five (5) days after they are first provided to the
Company by the Companys auditors, the Company will deliver
to Acquiror true and complete copies of the 2008 Financial
Statements and the 2008 Subsidiary Financial Statements.
Section 5.22 Board
Appointment. Acquiror shall take all
necessary action to arrange for the appointment of Larry Midland
to the Acquiror Board, effective upon the Effective Time.
ARTICLE VI
SURVIVABILITY
Section 6.1 Survival
of Representations, Warranties, and
Covenants. The representations and warranties
of the Company, the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and
Second-Step Merger Sub contained in this Agreement, the Company
Disclosure Schedules, the Acquiror Disclosure Schedules, and any
certificate or other document delivered pursuant hereto or
thereto or in connection with the transactions contemplated
hereby or thereby shall not survive the Effective Time;
provided, however, that the covenants and
agreements contained in Sections 5.14, 5.15(b) and
5.16, which by its terms contemplate actions or impose
obligations following the Effective Time, shall survive the
Effective Time and remain in full force and effect in accordance
with their terms.
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS
TO CLOSING
Section 7.1 General
Conditions. The respective obligations of
each party to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement shall be subject to the fulfillment, at or prior to
the Closing, of each of the following conditions, any of which
may, to the extent permitted by applicable Law, be waived in
writing by any party in its sole discretion (provided,
that such waiver shall only be effective as to the obligations
of such party):
(a) No Injunction or
Prohibition. No Governmental Authority shall
have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any Law
(whether temporary, preliminary or permanent), that is then in
effect and that enjoins, restrains, conditions, makes illegal or
otherwise prohibits the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements
(including the First-Step Merger and the Second-Step Merger).
(b) Approval of Shareholders.
(i) The Company Shareholder Approval shall have been
validly obtained under the Cal Code and the Companys
articles of incorporation and bylaws.
(ii) The Acquiror Shareholder Approval shall have been
validly obtained under the DGCL and the Acquirors
certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
(c) Form S-4. The
Form S-4
shall have become effective in accordance with the provisions of
the Securities Act, and no stop order shall have been issued and
be pending with respect to the
Form S-4.
(d) Listing. The shares of
Acquiror Common Stock to be issued in the Merger shall have been
approved for quotation (subject to notice of issuance) on
Nasdaq, and the Acquiror shall have maintained its existing
listing on Nasdaq.
(e) No Litigation. No Action shall
have been commenced or threatened by or before any Governmental
Authority that could (i) require divestiture of any assets
of the Acquiror as a result of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement or the divestiture of any assets of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) prohibit or impose
limitations on the Acquirors ownership or operation of all
or a material portion of its or the Companys business or
assets (or those of any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates), or
(iii) impose limitations on
A-57
the ability of the Acquiror or its Affiliates, or render the
Acquiror or its Affiliates unable, effectively to control the
business, assets or operations of the Company or its
Subsidiaries in any material respect.
(f) Reorganization Opinion of
Counsel. The Company and the Acquiror shall
have received a written opinion of Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP, counsel to the Acquiror, to the effect that
(i) the Merger will constitute a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Tax Code, (ii) each
of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub, Second-Step Merger Sub
and the Company will be a party to the reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Tax Code, and such opinion
shall not have been withdrawn, (iii) there shall be no gain
or loss recognized by Company Shareholders in connection with
their receipt of the Stock Merger Consideration Per Share and
the Warrant Consideration Per Share, and (iv) the Company
Shareholders shall generally recognize capital gain or loss with
respect to the Cash Merger Consideration Per Share;
provided, however, that any such opinion may rely
on representations as such counsel reasonably deems appropriate
and on typical assumptions. The Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub,
Second-Step Merger Sub and the Company agree to provide to such
counsel such representations as such counsel reasonably requests
in connection with rendering such opinions.
Section 7.2
Conditions to Obligations of the Company. The
obligations of the Company to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement shall be subject to the
fulfillment, at or prior to the Closing Date, of each of the
following conditions, any of which may be waived in writing by
the Company in its sole discretion:
(a) Representations, Warranties and
Covenants. The representations and warranties
of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger
Sub contained in this Agreement (disregarding all qualifications
and exceptions regarding materiality or Acquiror Material
Adverse Effect) or any Ancillary Agreement or any schedule,
certificate or other document delivered pursuant hereto or
thereto or in connection with the transactions contemplated
hereby or thereby shall be true and correct in all material
respects both when made and as of the Closing Date, or in the
case of representations and warranties that are made as of a
specified date, such representations and warranties shall be
true and correct in all material respects as of such specified
date. This condition shall be deemed satisfied unless the
Company would be entitled to terminate this Agreement pursuant
to Section 8.1(b) hereof. The Acquiror, First-Step
Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub shall have performed in
all material respects all obligations and agreements and
complied in all material respects with all covenants and
conditions required by this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement
to be performed or complied with by them prior to or at the
Closing Date.
(b) Closing Certificates.
(i) Officers
Certificates. The Company shall have
received, from each of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and
Second-Step Merger Sub a certificate certifying as to the
matters set forth in Section 7.2(a), signed by a
duly authorized officer of each of the Acquiror First-Step
Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub.
(ii) Good Standing
Certificate. The Company shall have received
a certificate of good standing from the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware (or such other applicable jurisdiction)
which is dated within five (5) days of the Closing Date
with respect to the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and
Second-Step Merger Sub.
(iii) Secretarys
Certificate. The Company shall have received
a certificate, validly executed by the Secretary of the
Acquiror, certifying (A) the terms and effectiveness of the
Acquirors certificate of incorporation and bylaws,
(B) the valid adoption of resolutions of the Acquiror Board
(whereby the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereunder
were approved by the Acquiror Board), (C) that the Acquiror
Shareholder Approval shall have been obtained and (D) such
other matters customarily included in such certificates or
reasonably requested by the Company.
(c) Rights Agreement. The Acquiror
Board shall have amended the Preferred Stock Rights Agreement to
prevent the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby from triggering the rights thereunder.
(d) Employment of Felix
Marx. Felix Marx shall remain in the employ
of the Acquiror as its chief executive officer.
A-58
(e) Absence of Material Adverse
Effect. There shall not have occurred any
event, change, circumstance, occurrence, effect or state of
facts that, individually on in the aggregate, has had or would
reasonably be expected to have an Acquiror Material Adverse
Effect.
(f) Board Appointment. Larry
Midland shall have been appointed to the Acquiror Board,
effective as of the Effective Time.
Section 7.3 Conditions
to Obligations of the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and
Second-Step Merger Sub. The obligations of
the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub
to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
shall be subject to the fulfillment, at or prior to the Closing
Date, of each of the following conditions, any of which may be
waived in writing by the Acquiror in its sole discretion:
(a) Representations, Warranties and
Covenants. The representations and warranties
of the Company contained in this Agreement (disregarding all
qualifications and exceptions regarding materiality or Company
Material Adverse Effect) or any Ancillary Agreement or any
schedule, certificate or other document delivered pursuant
hereto or thereto or in connection with the transactions
contemplated hereby or thereby shall be true and correct in all
material respects both when made and as of the Closing Date, or
in the case of representations and warranties that are made as
of a specified date, such representations and warranties shall
be true and correct in all material respects as of such
specified date. This condition shall be deemed satisfied unless
Acquiror would be entitled to terminate this Agreement pursuant
to Section 8.1(c) hereof. The Company shall have
performed in all material respects all obligations and
agreements and complied in all material respects with all
covenants and conditions required by this Agreement or any
Ancillary Agreement to be performed or complied with by it prior
to or at the Closing Date.
(b) Closing Certificates.
(i) Officers
Certificate. The Acquiror shall have received
a certificate certifying as to the matters set forth in
Section 7.3(a), signed by a duly authorized officer
of the Company; and
(ii) Good Standing
Certificate. The Acquiror shall have received
a certificate of good standing from the Secretary of State of
the State of California (or such other applicable jurisdiction)
which is dated within five (5) Business Days of the Closing
Date with respect to the Company and each of its Subsidiaries.
(iii) Secretarys
Certificate. The Acquiror shall have received
a certificate, validly executed by the Secretary of the Company,
certifying (A) the terms and effectiveness of the
Companys articles of incorporation and bylaws,
(B) the valid adoption of resolutions of the Company Board
(whereby the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereunder
were approved by the Company Board) and (C) that the
Company Shareholder Approval shall have been obtained, and
(D) such other matters customarily included in such
certificates or reasonably requested by the Acquiror.
(c) Consents and Approvals. All
Consents set forth on Schedule 7.3(c) shall have
been received and shall be satisfactory in form and substance to
the Acquiror.
(d) Ancillary Agreements. The
Acquiror shall have received an executed counterpart of each of
the Ancillary Agreements, signed by each party other than the
Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger Sub, and
all such Ancillary Agreements shall be and remain in full force
and effect as of the Closing Date; provided that only
three of the four New Employment Agreements, including the New
Employment Agreement of Larry Midland, shall be required to
remain in full force and effect as of the Closing Date.
(e) Resignations. The Acquiror
shall have received letters of resignation from the directors of
the Company and each of its Subsidiaries.
(f) Schedule of Transaction
Expenses. The Company shall have delivered to
the Acquiror the Schedule of Expenses.
(g) Delivery of Spreadsheet. The
Acquiror shall have received from the Company the Spreadsheet.
A-59
(h) FIRPTA Certificate. The
Acquiror shall have received a copy of the FIRPTA Compliance
Certificate.
(i) Third Party Expense Statements and
Releases. The Acquiror shall have received
from each third party referred to in the Schedule of Expenses a
written instrument in form and substance reasonably satisfactory
to the Acquiror containing (i) the invoice for the
aggregate unpaid fees and expenses of such party incurred by the
Company as of the Closing Date (and stating the amount of
previously paid fees and expenses) that are or may be
characterized as Company Transaction Expenses hereunder and
(ii) a statement releasing and discharging the Acquiror,
First-Step Merger Sub, Second-Step Merger Sub, the Company, the
Interim Surviving Corporation, the Final Surviving Entity, and
any of their Affiliates from any liability for any Company
Transaction Expenses or amounts thereof not specifically
referred to in the Schedule of Expenses.
(j) Dissenting Shares. The Company
shall have taken all action necessary with respect to the rights
of Dissenting Shares required pursuant to the Cal Code,
including the mailing of the notice required under
Chapter 13 of the Cal Code to any Dissenting Shareholders
as soon as reasonably practicable after obtaining the Company
Shareholder Approval, and on the Closing Date not more than ten
percent (10%) of the shares of Company Common Stock outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time are Dissenting Shares or
shall continue to have a right to exercise dissenters, appraisal
or other similar rights under applicable Law by virtue of the
Merger.
(k) EMEA Affiliate. The Company
shall have purchased all of the outstanding shares of Hirsch
EMEA, Inc. and Hirsch EMEA, Inc. shall have an option to
purchase 100% of the capital of MCV Trading SRL, on the terms
set forth in the agreement attached hereto as
Exhibit H.
(l) Termination of Stock Option Plans and Company
Options. The Company shall have terminated
all Company Option Plans and all Company Options as of the
Effective Time.
(m) Shareholder Approval. This
Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby shall have been approved by Company Shareholders holding
a majority of the shares of Company Common Stock outstanding as
of the applicable record date for the Company Shareholders
Meeting, provided, that for the purposes of this
Section 7.3(o), shares of Company Common Stock held
or beneficially owned by any of the Companys directors who
could be deemed to have a material financial interest (as such
term is used in connection with Section 310 of the Cal
Code) in the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any
of the Ancillary Agreements. or their Affiliates shall be
counted for purposes of determining the number of shares of
Company Common Stock outstanding, but shall not be counted for
purposes of determining whether a majority of the shares have
approved this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.
(n) No Material Adverse
Effect. There shall not have occurred any
event, change, circumstance, occurrence, effect or state of
facts that, individually on in the aggregate, has had or would
reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION
Section 8.1 Termination. This
Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective
Time:
(a) by mutual written consent of the Acquiror and the
Company
(b) by the Company, if the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub
or Second-Step Merger Sub (i) (A) breach any of their
representations or warranties contained in this Agreement or any
Ancillary Agreement and such breach(es) (disregarding all
qualifications and exceptions regarding materiality or Acquiror
Material Adverse Effect), individually or in the aggregate, give
rise to or could reasonably be expected to give rise to a loss,
cost, damage, liability or expense of the Acquiror or its
Subsidiaries in excess of $2,500,000, or (B) fails to
perform in all material respects any of the covenants contained
in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, (ii) such
breach(es) or failure(s) cannot be or has not been cured within
fifteen (15) days following delivery of written
A-60
notice of such breach or failure to perform and (iii) such
breach(es) or failure(s) have not been waived by the Company;
(c) by the Acquiror, if the Company (i) (A) breaches
any of its representations or warranties contained in this
Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement and such breaches
(disregarding all qualifications and exceptions regarding
materiality or Company Material Adverse Effect), individually or
in the aggregate, gives rise to or could reasonably be expected
to give rise to a loss, cost, damage, liability or expense of
the Company or its Subsidiaries in excess of $2,500,000, or
(B) fails to perform in all material respects any of the
covenants contained in this Agreement or any Ancillary
Agreement, (ii) such breach(es) or failure(s) cannot be or
has not been cured within fifteen (15) days following
delivery of written notice of such breach or failure to perform
and (iii) such breach(es) or failure(s) have not been
waived by the Acquiror;
(d) (i) by the Company, if any of the conditions set
forth in Section 7.1 or Section 7.2
shall have become incapable of fulfillment on or prior to
May 31, 2009 (the Outside Date;
provided, that, if the
Form S-4
is not declared effective on or before February 15, 2009,
or the Acquiror deems it necessary to adjourn or postpone the
Acquiror Shareholders Meeting in order to obtain the Acquiror
Shareholder Approval, then the Outside Date shall be
June 30, 2009, or (ii) by the Acquiror, if any of the
conditions set forth in Section 7.1 or
Section 7.3 shall have become incapable of
fulfillment on or prior to the Outside Date; provided,
that the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 8.1(d) shall not be available to any party
whose action or failure to act has been a principal cause of or
resulted in the failure of such condition to be satisfied on or
prior to the Outside Date and such action or failure to act
constitutes either (A) an intentional, willful or knowing
breach of any of such partys representations or warranties
contained in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement or
(B) a breach of any covenant contained in this Agreement or
any Ancillary Agreement.
(e) by either the Company or the Acquiror if the First-Step
Merger shall not have been consummated by the Outside Date;
provided, that, the right to terminate this Agreement
under this Section 8.1(e) shall not be available to
any party whose action or failure to act has been a principal
cause of or resulted in the failure of the Merger to be
consummated on or prior to the Outside Date and such action or
failure to act constitutes a breach of any covenant contained in
this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement;
(f) by the Acquiror if (i) at any time prior to
obtaining the Company Shareholder Approval (A) the Company
Board effects a Board Recommendation Change, (B) the
Company fails to include the Company Board Recommendation in the
Joint Proxy Statement, (C) the Company fails publicly to
reaffirm its recommendation of the Merger within five
(5) days after a request at any time to do so by the
Acquiror, or within five (5) days after the date any
Acquisition Proposal or any material modification thereto is
first commenced, published or sent or given to the Company
Shareholders (which reaffirmation must also include, with
respect to an Acquisition Proposal, an unconditional rejection
of such Acquisition Proposal, it being understood that taking no
position with respect to the acceptance of such Acquisition
Proposal or modification thereto shall constitute a failure to
reject such Acquisition Proposal), (ii) the Company or the
Company Board (or any committee thereof) shall (A) approve,
adopt, endorse or recommend any Acquisition Proposal or
(B) approve, adopt, endorse or recommend, or enter into or
allow the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to enter into, a
letter of intent, agreement in principle or definitive agreement
for an Acquisition Proposal, or (iii) the Company or the
Company Board (or any committee thereof) shall authorize or
publicly propose any of the foregoing;
(g) by the Company if (i) at any time prior to
obtaining the Acquiror Shareholder Approval (A) the
Acquiror Board effects a Board Recommendation Change,
(B) the Acquiror fails to include the Acquiror Board
Recommendation in the Joint Proxy Statement, (C) the
Acquiror fails publicly to reaffirm its recommendation of the
Merger within five (5) days after a request at any time to
do so by the Company, or within five (5) days after the
date any Acquisition Proposal or any material modification
thereto is first commenced, published or sent or given to the
Acquiror Shareholders, (ii) the Acquiror or the Acquiror
Board (or any committee thereof) shall (A) approve, adopt,
endorse or recommend any Acquisition Proposal or
(B) approve, adopt, endorse or recommend, or enter into or
allow the Acquiror or any of its Subsidiaries to enter into, a
letter of intent, agreement in principle or definitive agreement
for an Acquisition Proposal or
A-61
(iii) the Acquiror or the Acquiror Board (or any committee
thereof) shall authorize or publicly propose any of the
foregoing; or
(h) by the Acquiror if, at any time prior to obtaining the
Acquiror Shareholder Approval, the Acquiror Board has determined
to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to an Acquiror
Superior Proposal.
The party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 8.1 (other than Section 8.1(a))
shall give prompt written notice of such termination to the
other party.
Section 8.2 Effect
of Termination.
(a) Other than as set forth in this Section 8.2
or Section 8.3, in the event of termination of this
Agreement as provided in Section 8.1, this Agreement
shall forthwith become void and there shall be no liability on
the part of either party, except for the provisions of
Section 3.25 and Section 4.14 relating
to brokers fees and finders fees,
Section 5.11 relating to confidentiality,
Section 5.12 relating to public announcements,
Section 8.3, Article IX and this
Section 8.2, each of which shall each remain in full
force and effect.
(b) (i) If this Agreement is terminated by the
Acquiror pursuant to Section 8.1(f) or, pursuant to
Section 8.1(c), as a result of an intentional,
willful or knowing breach by the Company of any of its
representations, warranties or covenants contained in this
Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, then upon such
termination, the Company shall be obligated to pay to Acquiror
(by wire transfer of immediately available funds), no later than
five (5) Business Days after such termination, a
termination fee of one million, five hundred thousand
U.S. dollars $1,500,000, plus an amount equal to all
out-of-pocket expenses (excluding the cost of Acquirors
employee time) incurred by the Acquiror in connection with this
Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby, and (ii) if this Agreement
is terminated by the Acquiror pursuant to
Section 8.1(c), other than as a result of an
intentional, willful or knowing breach as described in
Section 8.2(b)(i) hereof by the Company, the Company
shall be obligated to pay to the Acquiror (by wire transfer of
immediately available funds), no later than five
(5) Business Days after such termination, a termination fee
of six hundred thousand U.S. dollars $600,000, plus an
amount equal to all out-of-pocket expenses (excluding the cost
of Acquirors employee time) incurred by the Acquiror in
connection with this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.
(c) (i) If this Agreement is terminated by the Company
pursuant to Section 8.1(g) or, pursuant to
Section 8.1(b), as a result of an intentional,
willful or knowing breach by the Acquiror of any of its
representations, warranties or covenants contained in this
Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, or by the Acquiror
pursuant to Section 8.1(h), then upon such
termination, the Acquiror shall be obligated to pay to Company
(by wire transfer of immediately available funds), no later than
five (5) Business Days after such termination, a
termination fee of one million, five hundred thousand
U.S. dollars $1,500,000, plus an amount equal to all
out-of-pocket Company Transaction Expenses (excluding the cost
of the Companys employee time) incurred by the Company in
connection with this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, and (ii) if
this Agreement is terminated by the Company pursuant to
Section 8.1(b), other than as a result of an
intentional, willful or knowing breach as described in
Section 8.2(c)(i) hereof by the Acquiror, the
Acquiror shall be obligated to pay to the Company (by wire
transfer of immediately available funds), no later than five
(5) Business Days after such termination, a termination fee
of six hundred thousand U.S. dollars $600,000, plus an
amount equal to all out-of-pocket Company Transaction Expenses
(excluding the cost of the Companys employee time)
incurred by the Company in connection with this Agreement, the
Ancillary Agreements and the transactions contemplated hereby
and thereby.
Section 8.3 Remedies. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, any
Ancillary Agreement or any other Contract made as of the date
hereof or subsequent hereto, including, without limitation,
Sections 8.2(a), (b) and (c) hereof,
nothing shall relieve a party from liability for any breach of
any representation, warranty or covenant set forth in this
Agreement, any Ancillary Agreements or any other Contract, and
the rights and remedies set forth in
Sections 8.2(a), (b) and (c) hereof
are in addition to, and shall not be in limitation of, any other
right or remedy, whether at law or in equity, including under
Section 9.12, that a party made have, including,
without limitation, the right to an injunction or injunctions to
prevent breaches of this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreements or
any other Contract and to enforce specifically the terms and
provisions of this Agreement, any
A-62
Ancillary Agreements or any other Contract to prevent breaches
of or to enforce compliance with the covenants set forth in this
Agreement, any Ancillary Agreements or any other Contract,
including the obligation to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreements or any
other Contract; provided that, other than in the case of
an intentional, willful or knowing breach of any covenant
contained in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, a party
shall not have a right to bring an action for monetary damages
except for the amounts set forth in Section 8.2(b)
and (c).
ARTICLE IX
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Section 9.1 Fees
and Expenses. Except as otherwise provided
herein, all fees and expenses incurred in connection with or
related to this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements and the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby shall be paid by
the party incurring such fees or expenses, whether or not such
transactions are consummated. In the event of termination of
this Agreement, the obligation of each party to pay its own
expenses will be subject to any rights of such party arising
from a breach of this Agreement by the other.
Section 9.2 Amendment
and Modification. This Agreement may be
amended, modified or supplemented by the parties by action taken
or authorized by their respective boards of directors at any
time prior to the Closing Date (notwithstanding any shareholder
approval); provided, however, that after approval
of the transactions contemplated hereby by the Company
Shareholders or the Acquiror Shareholders, no amendment shall be
made which pursuant to applicable Law requires further approval
by such shareholders without such further approval. This
Agreement may not be amended, modified or supplemented in any
manner, whether by course of conduct or otherwise, except by an
instrument in writing specifically designated as an amendment
hereto, signed on behalf of each of the parties in interest at
the time of the amendment; provided, however, that
the consents and notices required pursuant to
Sections 5.1 or 5.2 hereof may be in the form
of email communication(s).
Section 9.3 Extension. At
any time prior to the Effective Time, the parties, by action
taken or authorized by their respective boards of directors,
may, to the extent permitted by applicable Law, extend the time
for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of
the parties. Any agreement on the part of a party to any such
extension shall be valid only if set forth in a written
instrument executed and delivered by a duly authorized officer
on behalf of such party.
Section 9.4 Waiver. At
any time prior to the Effective Time, the parties may, by action
taken or authorized by their respective boards of directors, to
the extent permitted by applicable Law, (a) waive any
inaccuracies in the representations and warranties of the other
parties contained in this Agreement or any document delivered
pursuant hereto, (b) subject to applicable Law, waive
compliance with any of the agreements or conditions of the other
parties contained herein, or (c) subject to applicable Law,
waive any of the conditions to such partys obligations.
Any agreement on the part of a party to any such waiver shall be
valid only if set forth in a written instrument executed and
delivered by a duly authorized officer on behalf of such party.
No failure or delay of any party in exercising any right or
remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall
any single or partial exercise of any such right or power, or
any abandonment or discontinuance of steps to enforce such right
or power, or any course of conduct, preclude any other or
further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right or
power. The rights and remedies of the parties hereunder are
cumulative and are not exclusive of any rights or remedies which
they would otherwise have hereunder.
Section 9.5 Notices. All
notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing
and shall be deemed duly given (a) on the date of delivery
if delivered personally, or if by facsimile, upon written
confirmation of receipt by facsimile, (b) on the first
Business Day following the date of dispatch if delivered
utilizing a recognized
next-day
courier that guarantees
next-day
delivery (except in the case of overseas delivery, in which case
notice shall be deemed duly given on the third Business Day
following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing an
expedited service by a recognized international courier) or
(c) on the earlier of confirmed receipt or the fifth
Business Day following the date of mailing if delivered by
registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage
prepaid (except in the case of overseas delivery, in which case
notice shall be deemed duly given on confirmed receipt if
delivered by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested, postage prepaid). All notices
A-63
hereunder shall be delivered to the addresses set forth below,
or pursuant to such other instructions as may be designated in
writing by the party to receive such notice:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
if to the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub, Second-Step Merger
Sub, Interim Surviving Corporation or Final Surviving Entity, to:
|
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13,
85737, Ismaning Germany
Attention: Felix Marx
Facsimile: +49.89.9595.5170
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105
Attention: Michael L. Reed
Facsimile: 415.374.8459
(ii) if to the Company to:
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
1900-B Carnegie Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Attention: Larry Midland
Facsimile: 949.250.7372
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP
2603 Main Street, Suite 1300
Irvine, CA 92614
Attention: Alan H. Wiener, Esq.
Facsimile: 949.851.1554
Section 9.6 Interpretation. When
a reference is made in this Agreement to a Section, Article or
Exhibit such reference shall be to a Section, Article or Exhibit
of this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of
contents and headings contained in this Agreement or in any
Exhibit are for convenience of reference purposes only and shall
not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this
Agreement. All words used in this Agreement will be construed to
be of such gender or number as the circumstances require. Any
capitalized terms used in any Exhibit but not otherwise defined
therein shall have the meaning as defined in this Agreement. All
Exhibits annexed hereto or referred to herein are hereby
incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement as if set
forth herein. The word including and words of
similar import when used in this Agreement will mean
including, without limitation, unless otherwise
specified. Unless otherwise specifically provided or the context
otherwise requires, all references in this Agreement to the
Company shall mean and refer to the Company and its direct and
indirect Subsidiaries.
Section 9.7 Entire
Agreement. This Agreement (including the
Annexes, Exhibits and Schedules hereto), the Ancillary
Agreements and the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the
entire agreement, and supersede all prior written agreements,
arrangements, communications and understandings and all prior
and contemporaneous oral agreements, arrangements,
communications and understandings among the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof and thereof. Notwithstanding any
oral agreement or course of action of the parties or any of
their respective Subsidiaries, Affiliates or Representatives to
the contrary, no party to this Agreement shall be under any
legal obligation to enter into or complete the transactions
contemplated hereby unless and until this Agreement shall have
been executed and delivered by each of the parties.
A-64
Section 9.8 No
Third-Party Beneficiaries. Except as provided
in Section 5.14 hereof, nothing in this Agreement,
express or implied, is intended to or shall confer upon any
Person other than the parties and their respective successors
and permitted assigns any legal or equitable right, benefit or
remedy of any nature under or by reason of this Agreement. The
parties hereto further agree that the rights of third party
beneficiaries under Section 5.14 shall not arise
unless and until the Effective Time occurs. The representations
and warranties in this Agreement are the product of negotiations
among the parties hereto and are for the sole benefit of the
parties hereto. Any inaccuracies in such representations and
warranties are subject to waiver by the parties hereto in
accordance with Section 9.4 without notice or
liability to any other Person. In some instances, the
representations and warranties in this Agreement may represent
an allocation among the parties hereto of risks associated with
particular matters regardless of the knowledge of any of the
parties hereto. Consequently, Persons (other than the parties
hereto) may not rely upon the representations and warranties in
this Agreement as characterizations of actual facts or
circumstances as of the date of this Agreement or as of any
other date.
Section 9.9 Governing
Law. Except to the extent that the Laws of
the State of California and Delaware are mandatorily applicable
to the Merger, this Agreement shall be governed by, and
construed in accordance with, the Laws of the State of
California, without regard to the conflicts of Laws provisions
thereof that would apply the Laws of any other state.
Section 9.10 Submission
to Jurisdiction. Each of the parties
irrevocably agrees that any Action (legal or otherwise) arising
out of or relating to this Agreement brought by any other party
or its successors or assigns shall be brought and determined in
any California State or federal court sitting in the City and
County of San Francisco or the County of Orange (or, if
such court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, in any appropriate
California State or federal court), and each of the parties
hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the
aforesaid courts for itself and with respect to its property,
generally and unconditionally, with regard to any such Action
arising out of or relating to this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby. Each of the parties agrees not
to commence any Action relating thereto except in the courts
described above in California, other than Actions in any court
of competent jurisdiction to enforce any judgment, decree or
award rendered by any such court in California as described
herein. Each of the parties further agrees that notice as
provided herein shall constitute sufficient service of process
and the parties further waive any argument that such service is
insufficient. Each of the parties hereby irrevocably and
unconditionally waives, and agrees not to assert, by way of
motion or as a defense, counterclaim or otherwise, in any Action
arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby, (a) any claim that it is not
personally subject to the jurisdiction of the courts in
California as described herein for any reason, (b) that it
or its property is exempt or immune from jurisdiction of any
such court or from any legal process commenced in such courts
(whether through service of notice, attachment prior to
judgment, attachment in aid of execution of judgment, execution
of judgment or otherwise) and (c) that (i) the Action
in any such court is brought in an inconvenient forum,
(ii) the venue of such Action is improper or
(iii) this Agreement, or the subject matter hereof, may not
be enforced in or by such courts.
Section 9.11 Assignment;
Successors. Neither this Agreement nor any of
the rights, interests or obligations under this Agreement may be
assigned or delegated, in whole or in part, by operation of Law
or otherwise, by any party without the prior written consent of
the Acquiror (in the case of an assignment by the Company) or
the Company (in the case of an assignment by the Acquiror,
First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger Sub), and any such
assignment without such prior written consent shall be null and
void; provided, however, that the Acquiror,
First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step Merger Sub may assign this
Agreement to any Affiliate of the Acquiror without the prior
consent of the Company; provided further, that no
assignment shall limit the assignors obligations
hereunder. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement
will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be
enforceable by, the parties and their respective successors and
assigns.
Section 9.12 Enforcement. The
parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event
that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed
in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise
breached. Accordingly, each of the parties shall be entitled to
specific performance of the terms hereof, including an
injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement
and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this
Agreement in any California State or federal court sitting in
the City and County of San Francisco or the County of
Orange (or, if such court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, in
any appropriate California State or federal court), this being
in addition to any other remedy to which such party is entitled
at law or in equity. Each of the
A-65
parties hereby further waives (a) any defense in any Action
for specific performance that a remedy at law would be adequate
and (b) any requirement under any Law to post security as a
prerequisite to obtaining equitable relief. For the avoidance of
doubt, this remedy shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of,
the remedies set forth in Article VIII.
Section 9.13 Currency. All
references to dollars or $ or
US$ in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement
refer to United States dollars, which is the currency used for
all purposes in this Agreement and any Ancillary Agreement.
Section 9.14 Severability. Whenever
possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this
Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective
and valid under applicable Law, but if any provision or portion
of any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid,
illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any applicable Law
or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or
unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or portion
of any provision in such jurisdiction, and this Agreement shall
be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction as if
such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision or portion of
any provision had never been contained herein.
Section 9.15 Waiver
of Jury Trial. EACH OF THE PARTIES TO THIS
AGREEMENT HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ALL RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY
IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED
HEREBY.
Section 9.16 Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of
which shall be considered one and the same instrument and shall
become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed
by each of the parties and delivered to the other party.
Section 9.17 Facsimile
Signature. This Agreement may be executed by
facsimile signature and a facsimile signature shall constitute
an original for all purposes.
Section 9.18 Time
of Essence. Time is of the essence with
regard to all dates and time periods set forth or referred to in
this Agreement.
Section 9.19 No
Presumption Against Drafting Party. Each of
the Acquiror, First-Step Merger Sub, Second-Step Merger Sub and
the Company acknowledges that each party to this Agreement has
been represented by counsel in connection with this Agreement
and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Accordingly, any rule of Law or any legal decision that would
require interpretation of any claimed ambiguities in this
Agreement against the drafting party has no application and is
expressly waived.
[The
remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
A-66
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the date first written above by their respective
officers thereunto duly authorized.
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
Felix Marx
Chief Executive Officer
DEER ACQUISITION, INC.
Felix Marx
President
HART ACQUISITION LLC
Felix Marx
President
HIRSCH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Lawrence
W. Midland
|
Lawrence W. Midland
President
[Signature
Page to Merger Agreement]
A-67
Annex B
IRREVOCABLE
PROXY AND VOTING AGREEMENT
This Irrevocable Proxy and Voting Agreement (this
Agreement), dated as of December 10,
2008, is entered into by and among SCM Microsystems, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Parent), and Deer
Acquisition, Inc., a California corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Parent (First-Step Merger Sub),
Hart Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror (Second-Step
Merger Sub), Hirsch Electronics Corporation, a
California corporation (the Company) and the
shareholder(s) of the Company and each of their respective
affiliates as set forth on the signature pages hereto
(collectively, the Shareholder).
WHEREAS, concurrently herewith, Parent, First-Step Merger Sub,
Second-Step Merger Sub, the Company and certain other parties,
have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as
December 10, 2008 (the Merger
Agreement), pursuant to which, among other things,
through a two-step merger the Company will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent and be transformed into a new Delaware
limited liability company (the Merger).
WHEREAS, Shareholder, as of the date hereof, is the beneficial
owner (as defined below) of the number of shares of the common
stock, no par value per share, of the Company set forth on
Shareholders signature page hereto (such shares, together
with any and all other shares of capital stock or other voting
securities of the Company with respect to which the Shareholder,
directly or indirectly, has beneficial ownership as of the date
hereof or with respect to which Shareholder, directly or
indirectly, acquires beneficial ownership after the date hereof,
including, without limitation, shares received pursuant to any
stock splits, stock dividends or distributions, shares acquired
by purchase or upon the exercise, conversion or exchange of any
option, warrant or convertible security or otherwise, and any
shares or any voting securities of the Company received pursuant
to any change in the capital stock of the Company by reason of
any recapitalization, merger, reorganization, consolidation,
combination, exchange of shares or the like, are collectively
referred to herein as the Shareholder
Shares). For purposes of this Agreement, the terms
beneficial owner and
beneficial ownership shall have the meaning
described in Rule 13(d)(3) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act) and any securities beneficially owned by
Shareholder shall include securities beneficially owned by all
other Persons with whom Shareholder would constitute a
group as within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3)
of the Exchange Act.
WHEREAS, as an inducement for and a condition to Parent,
First-Step Merger Sub, and Second-Step Merger Sub agreeing to
enter into the Merger Agreement and in consideration of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, concurrently
with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Shareholder has
agreed to enter into this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
promises, representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Definitions. For purposes of
this Agreement, capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined
herein but which are defined in the Merger Agreement shall have
the meanings ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement, unless
the context clearly indicates otherwise.
2. Voting Agreement. Shareholder
hereby agrees that, at any meeting of the Companys
shareholders, however called, or in connection with any written
consent of the Companys shareholders, Shareholder shall
vote, or cause to be voted, all Shareholder Shares for which
Shareholder is entitled to vote or for which Shareholder has the
right to vote or direct the voting, as of the applicable record
date and/or
meeting date of such meeting or as of the date of the written
consent, (i) in favor of approval of the Merger Agreement
(including the agreements referred to therein), the transactions
contemplated thereby and any actions required in furtherance of
the transactions contemplated thereby, and (ii) against
(A) any Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger
Agreement) for the Company, (B) any action, agreement or
proposal that would reasonably be expected to result in a breach
in any respect of any representation, warranty, agreement or
covenant or other obligation of the Company under the Merger
Agreement (or any agreement referred to therein), (C) any
change in a majority of the individuals who, as of the date
hereof, constitute the Board of Directors of the Company, except
as otherwise agreed to in writing in
B-1
advance by Parent, provided that if one or more
individuals presently on the Board of Directors of the Company
withdraws his nomination for reelection at any meeting of
shareholders for the election of directors, Shareholder may vote
for a replacement director nominated by the Company s
Board of Directors and reasonably acceptable to Parent, or
(D) any action or agreement which is intended, or could
reasonably be expected, to impede, interfere with, delay,
postpone or materially adversely affect the Merger or any other
transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement (including the
agreements referred to therein); provided that nothing in
this Agreement shall be interpreted as obligating any
Shareholder to exercise any options or warrants to acquire
shares of capital stock of the Company.
3. Irrevocable Proxy.
a. Shareholder hereby constitutes and appoints Parent,
which shall act through any of its executive officers (the
Proxy Holder), with full power of
substitution, its true and lawful proxy and attorney-in-fact to
vote at any meeting (and any adjournment or postponement
thereof) of the Companys shareholders called for purposes
of considering whether to approve the Merger Agreement
(including the agreements referred to therein), the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated thereby, any Acquisition
Proposal or any other transaction, proposal or act described in
Section 2 hereof, or to execute a written consent of
shareholders in lieu of any such meeting, all Shareholder Shares
for which Shareholder is entitled to vote or for which
Shareholder has the right to vote or direct the voting, as of
the relevant record date or meeting date or written consent
(i) in favor of the approval of the Merger Agreement
(including the agreements referred to therein), the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated thereby and
(ii) against any Acquisition Proposal and any other
proposal or action described in Section 2(a)(ii) hereof.
Upon the request of Parent, Shareholder shall cause a similar
proxy to be granted by any other record holder of any
Shareholder Shares as to which Shareholder has a beneficial
interest or the right to vote or direct the voting.
b. The proxy and power of attorney granted herein shall be
irrevocable during the term of this Agreement, shall be deemed
to be coupled with an interest sufficient in law to support an
irrevocable proxy and shall revoke all prior proxies granted by
Shareholder. Shareholder shall not grant any proxy to any person
which conflicts with the proxy granted herein, and any attempt
to do so shall be void. The power of attorney granted herein is
a durable power of attorney and shall survive the death or
incapacity of Shareholder.
c. If Shareholder fails for any reason to vote his, her or
its Shareholder Shares in accordance with the requirements of
Section 2 hereof, then the Proxy Holder shall have the
right to vote the Shareholder Shares at any meeting of the
Companys shareholders and in any action by written consent
of the Companys shareholders in accordance with the
provisions of Section 3(a) hereof. The vote of the Proxy
Holder shall control in any conflict between a vote of such
Shareholder Shares by the Proxy Holder and a vote of such
Shareholder Shares by Shareholder.
4. Other Covenants, Representations and
Warranties. Shareholder hereby represents and
warrants to, and covenants with, Parent, First-Step Merger Sub
and Second-Step Merger Sub as follows:
a. Ownership of Shareholder
Shares. Shareholder is the record and sole
beneficial owner of all of the Shareholder Shares. Shareholder
has sole voting power and the sole power of disposition with
respect to all of the Shareholder Shares, with no limitations,
qualifications or restrictions on such rights, other than the
Stockholder Agreement relating to the stock of Parent entered
into concurrently herewith. Other than the Shareholder Shares,
Shareholder does not have beneficial ownership of any shares of
capital stock or other voting securities of the Company.
Shareholder will promptly provide written notice to Parent,
First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub in the event
the Shareholder acquires beneficial ownership of any additional
Shareholder Shares after the date hereof and a description
thereof.
b. Power; Binding
Agreement. Shareholder has the legal
capacity, power and authority to enter into and perform all of
Shareholders obligations under this Agreement. The
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by
Shareholder will not violate any Contract or other agreement or
any Law, rule or regulation or court order to which Shareholder
is a party or is subject, including, without limitation, any
voting agreement or voting trust. This Agreement has been duly
and validly executed and delivered by Shareholder and
constitutes a valid and binding agreement of Shareholder,
enforceable against Shareholder in accordance with
B-2
its terms, subject to any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium or similar laws now or hereafter in
effect relating to creditors rights generally or to
general principles of equity.
c. No Conflict. The execution,
delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Shareholder
does not and will not violate, conflict with, result in a breach
of, or constitute a default (or an event that, without the
giving of notice or the lapse of time, or both, would constitute
a default) under (i) formation documents, if any, of the
Shareholder, (ii) any applicable law, rule, regulation,
judgment, injunction, order or decree binding upon the
Shareholder or any of its assets or properties, except for any
such violations which would be immaterial to Parent or the
Shareholder, or (c) any agreement or other instrument
binding upon such Shareholder.
d. Restriction on Transfer, Proxies and
Non-Interference. Except as expressly
contemplated by this Agreement, during the term of this
Agreement, Shareholder shall not, directly or indirectly:
(i) offer for sale, sell, transfer, tender, pledge,
encumber, assign or otherwise dispose of, or enter into any
contract, option or other arrangement or understanding with
respect to, or consent to the offer for sale, sale, transfer,
tender, pledge, encumbrance, assignment or other disposition of,
any or all of the Shareholder Shares or any interest therein;
(ii) grant any proxies or powers of attorney with respect
to any Shareholder Shares or deposit any Shareholder Shares into
a voting trust or enter into a voting agreement with respect to
any Shareholder Shares (any of the actions described in
clause (i) or clause (ii) of this sentence, a
Transfer); or (iii) take any action that
would make any representation or warranty of Shareholder
contained herein untrue or incorrect in any respect or could
have the effect of preventing or disabling Shareholder from
performing any of Shareholders obligations under this
Agreement; provided, however, that Shareholder may
Transfer Shareholder Shares to a corporation, partnership, fund,
trust or similar entity directly or indirectly controlled by
such Shareholder primarily for investment, tax or estate
planning purposes so long as, prior to the effectiveness of any
such Transfer, Shareholder provides written notice to Parent,
First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub and such
transferee executes and delivers to Parent, First-Step Merger
Sub and Second-Step Merger Sub an irrevocable proxy and voting
agreement in the form of this Agreement with respect to the
Shareholder Shares so Transferred.
e. Other Potential
Acquirors. Shareholder (i) shall
immediately cease any existing discussions or negotiations, if
any, with any Persons conducted heretofore with respect to any
acquisition of all or any material portion of the assets of, or
any equity interest in, the Company, or any business combination
with the Company; (ii) from and after the date hereof until
the earliest to occur of (A) the termination of the Merger
Agreement in accordance with its terms and (B) the
Effective Time, shall not, in his, her or its capacity as a
shareholder of the Company, directly or indirectly, initiate,
solicit or knowingly encourage (including, without limitation,
by way of furnishing non-public information or assistance), or
take any other action to facilitate knowingly, any inquiries or
the making of any Acquisition Proposal; and (iii) shall
promptly notify Parent of any proposals for, or inquiries with
respect to, a potential Acquisition Proposal received by
Stockholder or of which Stockholder otherwise has knowledge,
including the identity of the person making such proposal or
inquiry and the material terms of any such proposal.
f. Merger Agreement
Provisions. Shareholder has reviewed and
understands the provisions of the Merger Agreement.
g. Reliance by Parent, First-Step Merger Sub and
Second-Step Merger Sub. Shareholder
understands and acknowledges that Parent, First-Step Merger Sub
and Second-Step Merger Sub are entering into the Merger
Agreement in reliance upon Shareholders execution and
delivery of this Agreement and the representations, warranties
and covenants of Stockholder made herein.
h. Termination of Shareholder
Agreements. Shareholder hereby agrees that,
effective immediately prior to the Effective Time, any and all
voting, investor rights, co-sale or other similar agreements by
and among the Company and its shareholders to which Shareholder
is a party shall be terminated and be of no further force and
effect. The Company and Shareholder hereby waive any and all
rights of co-sale, rights of first refusal or other rights that
the Company or Shareholder may have pursuant to any such
agreements, or otherwise, to purchase or otherwise acquire any
securities of the Company that are subject to this Agreement or
any similar agreement entered into with any other shareholder of
the Company.
B-3
5. Stop Transfer;
Adjustments. Shareholder agrees that it will
not request that the Company register the Transfer (book-entry
or otherwise) of any certificate or uncertificated interest
representing any Shareholder Shares and that the Company may
refuse to register any such Transfer on its books and records.
The Company hereby agrees not to register on its stock transfer
books any attempted Transfer made in contravention of this
Agreement.
6. Effectiveness;
Termination. This Agreement shall
automatically become effective as of the same date and time as
the Company, Parent, First-Step Merger Sub and Second-Step
Merger Sub execute and deliver the Merger Agreement. This
Agreement shall terminate upon the earlier to occur of
(a) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance
with its terms, either by the Company or by Parent, as the case
may be, and (b) the Effective Time of the Merger. The
representations and warranties set forth herein shall not
survive the termination of this Agreement.
7. Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed
duly given (a) on the date of delivery if delivered
personally, or if by facsimile, upon written confirmation of
receipt by facsimile, (b) on the first (1st) Business Day
following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized courier under circumstances in which such courier
guarantees
next-day
delivery (except in the case of overseas delivery, in which case
notice shall be deemed duly given on the third (3rd) Business
Day following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized international courier under circumstances in which
such courier guarantees such delivery) or (c) on the
earlier of confirmed receipt or the fifth Business Day following
the date of mailing if delivered by registered or certified
mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid (except in the
case of overseas delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed
duly given on confirmed receipt if delivered by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid). All
notices hereunder shall be delivered to the addresses set forth
below, or pursuant to such other instructions as may be
designated in writing by the party to receive such notice:
(i) if to Parent, First-Step Merger Sub or Second-Step
Merger Sub:
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13,
85737, Ismaning Germany
Attention: Felix Marx
Facsimile: +49.89.9595.5170
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105
Attention: Michael L. Reed
Facsimile: 415.374.8459
(ii) if to the Company, to:
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
1900-B Carnegie Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Attention: Larry Midland
Facsimile: 949.250.7372
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron LLP
2603 Main Street, Suite 1300
Irvine, CA 92614
Attention: Alan H. Wiener, Esq.
Facsimile: 949.851.1554
(iii) if to Shareholder, to the address of Shareholder set
forth on the signature page hereto.
B-4
8. Miscellaneous.
a. Entire Agreement. This
Agreement constitutes the entire agreement, and supersede all
prior written agreements, arrangements, communications and
understandings and all prior and contemporaneous oral
agreements, arrangements, communications and understandings
among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
thereof.
b. Amendments and Waivers. This
Agreement may not be amended, modified or supplemented in any
manner, whether by course of conduct or otherwise, except by an
instrument in writing specifically designated as an amendment
hereto, signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto. Any
agreement on the part of a party to any waiver shall be valid
only if set forth in a written instrument executed and delivered
by such party. No failure or delay of any party in exercising
any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof,
nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right or
power, or any abandonment or discontinuance of steps to enforce
such right or power, or any course of conduct, preclude any
other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other
right or power. The rights and remedies of the parties hereunder
are cumulative and are not exclusive of any rights or remedies
which they would otherwise have hereunder.
c. Assignment. Neither this
Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations under
this Agreement may be assigned or delegated, in whole or in
part, by operation of law or otherwise, by any party without the
prior written consent of Parent (in the case of an assignment by
Shareholder) or the Shareholder (in the case of an assignment by
Parent), and any such assignment without such prior written
consent shall be null and void; provided, however,
that Parent may assign this Agreement to any Affiliate of Parent
without the prior consent of the Shareholder; provided
further, that no assignment shall limit the
assignors obligations hereunder. Subject to the preceding
sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the
benefit of, and be enforceable by, the parties and their
respective successors and assigns.
d. Transferees. Shareholder agrees
that this Agreement and the obligations hereunder shall attach
to the Shareholder Shares and shall be binding upon any person
to whom legal or beneficial ownership of any Shareholder Shares
shall pass, whether by operation of law or otherwise.
Notwithstanding any Transfer of Shareholder Shares, the
transferor shall remain liable for the performance of all of
his, her or its obligations under this Agreement.
e. Specific Performance. The
parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event
that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed
in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise
breached. Accordingly, each of the parties shall be entitled to
specific performance of the terms hereof, including an
injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement
and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this
Agreement in any court, this being in addition to any other
remedy to which such party is entitled at law or in equity. Each
of the parties hereby further waives (i) any defense in any
action for specific performance that a remedy at law would be
adequate and (ii) any requirement under any law to post
security as a prerequisite to obtaining equitable relief.
f. Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with, the Laws
of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts of
laws provisions thereof that would apply the laws of any other
state.
g. Submission to
Jurisdiction. Each of the parties irrevocably
agrees that any legal action or proceeding arising out of or
relating to this Agreement brought by any other party or its
successors or assigns shall be brought and determined in any
California State or federal court sitting in the County of
Orange or the City and County of San Francisco (or, if such
court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, in any appropriate
California State or federal court), and each of the parties
hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the
aforesaid courts for itself and with respect to its property,
generally and unconditionally, with regard to any such action or
proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby. Each of the parties agrees not
to commence any action, suit or proceeding relating thereto
except in the courts described above in California, other than
actions in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce any
judgment, decree or award rendered by any such court in
California as described herein. Each of the parties further
agrees that notice as provided herein shall constitute
sufficient service of process and the parties further waive any
argument that such service is insufficient. Each of the parties
hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives, and agrees not to
assert, by way of motion or as a
B-5
defense, counterclaim or otherwise, in any action or proceeding
arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby, (i) any claim that it is not
personally subject to the jurisdiction of the courts in
California as described herein for any reason, (ii) that it
or its property is exempt or immune from jurisdiction of any
such court or from any legal process commenced in such courts
(whether through service of notice, attachment prior to
judgment, attachment in aid of execution of judgment, execution
of judgment or otherwise) and (iii) that (A) the suit,
action or proceeding in any such court is brought in an
inconvenient forum, (B) the venue of such suit, action or
proceeding is improper or (C) this Agreement, or the
subject matter hereof, may not be enforced in or by such courts.
h. Severability. Whenever
possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this
Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective
and valid under applicable Law, but if any provision or portion
of any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid,
illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any applicable Law
or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or
unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or portion
of any provision in such jurisdiction, and this Agreement shall
be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction as if
such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision or portion of
any provision had never been contained herein.
i. Shareholder
Acknowledgment. Shareholder acknowledges and
agrees that he has had the opportunity to consult legal counsel
in regard to this Agreement, that he has read and understands
this Agreement, that he is fully aware of its legal effect, and
that he has entered into it freely and voluntarily and based on
his own judgment and not on any representations, warranties or
promises other than those contained in this Agreement.
j. Further Assurances. Each of the
parties agrees to execute, acknowledge, deliver and perform, and
cause to be executed, acknowledged, delivered and performed, at
any time and from time to time, as the case may be, all such
further acts, deeds, assignments, transfers, conveyances, powers
of attorney and assurances as may be reasonably necessary to
carry out the provisions or intent of this Agreement
k. Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall
be considered one and the same instrument and shall become
effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each
of the parties and delivered to the other party. This Agreement
may be executed by facsimile signature and a facsimile signature
shall constitute an original for all purposes.
[Signature
page follows]
B-6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this
Agreement, or caused this Agreement to be duly executed, as of
the day and year first above written.
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
Felix Marx
Chief Executive Officer
DEER ACQUISITION, INC.
Felix Marx
President
HART ACQUISITION LLC
Felix Marx
President
HIRSCH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Name: Larry Midland
B-7
MAURY POLNER AND VIVIAN A. POLNER,
AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE POLNER LIVING
TRUST ESTABLISHED JUNE 8, 2000:
/s/ Maury
Polner, Co-Trustee
MAURY POLNER, Co-Trustee
/s/ Vivian
A. Polner, Co-Trustee
VIVIAN A. POLNER, Co-Trustee
Address:
44-647 S. Heritage
Palms Dr.
Indio, CA 92201
Number of Shareholder Shares:
76,000
SHAREHOLDER
JOHN W. PICCININNI
Address:
47 Shearwater Pl.
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Number of Shareholder Shares:
10,000
B-8
SHAREHOLDER
DOUGLAS J. MORGAN
Address:
7600 S. Rainbow Blvd., #1129
Las Vegas, NV 89139
Number of Shareholder Shares:
108,104
PERFORMANCE STRATEGIES INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN & TRUST
DOUGLAS J. MORGAN, Trustee
Address:
7600 S. Rainbow Blvd., #1129
Las Vegas, NV 89139
Number of Shareholder Shares:
25,000
B-9
SHAREHOLDER
MIDLAND FAMILY TRUST EST JAN 29 2002
L. W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Number of Shareholder Shares:
619,800
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR ASHLEY
MARIE MIDLAND UCGMA
L. W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Number of Shareholder Shares:
2,600
(signature continued on next page)
B-10
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR ALISON
MIDLAND UCGMA
L. W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Number of Shareholder Shares:
3,000
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR TAYLOR ANN MIDLAND UCGMA
L. W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Number of Shareholder Shares:
2,000
B-11
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR MADISON KATHLEEN MIDLAND UCGMA
L. W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Number of Shareholder Shares:
1,400
SHAREHOLDER
THE MAK FAMILY TRUST DTD 11/27/79
EUGENE Y. K. MAK, Trustee
Address:
32681 Mediterranean Dr.
Dana Point, CA 92629
Number of Shareholder Shares:
80,333
B-12
SHAREHOLDER
PTC CUST IRA FBO EUGENE Y. K. MAK
EUGENE Y. K. MAK
Address:
32681 Mediterranean Dr.
Dana Point, CA 92629
Number of Shareholder Shares:
71,748
SHAREHOLDER
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
P. Beliles, Jr.
|
ROBERT P. BELILES, JR.
Address:
29 Cherry Hills Dr.
Coto de Caza, CA 92679
Number of Shareholder Shares:
5,000
B-13
SHAREHOLDER
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
C. Zivney, Jr.
|
ROBERT C. ZIVNEY, JR.
Address:
18 MacKenzie Lane
Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679
Number of Shareholder Shares:
1,471
ROBERT C. ZIVNEY & MARJORIE J. ZIVNEY TTEE U/A DTD JAN
10, 2008 ZIVNEY FAMILY TRUST
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
C. Zivney, Jr., Trustee
|
ROBERT C. ZIVNEY, JR., Trustee
/s/ Marjorie
J. Zivney, Trustee
MARJORIE J. ZIVNEY, Trustee
Address:
18 MacKenzie Lane
Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679
Number of Shareholder Shares:
15,000
[Signature
Page to Irrevocable Proxy and Voting Agreement]
B-14
Annex C
STOCKHOLDER
AGREEMENT
This Stockholder Agreement (this Agreement)
is dated as of December 10, 2008, by and among SCM
Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(Parent), the persons signing under the
heading Management Stockholders on the signature
page hereto (each a Management Stockholder)
and the persons signing under the heading Other
Stockholders on the signature page hereto (each an
Other Stockholder and together with the
Management Stockholders, each a Stockholder).
WHEREAS, Parent, Hirsch Electronics Corporation, a California
corporation (the Company), and certain other
parties thereto have entered into that certain Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated as of December 10, 2008 (the
Merger Agreement), pursuant to which, among
other things, through a two-step merger the Company will become
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent and be transformed into a
new Delaware limited liability company (the
Merger).
WHEREAS, the Stockholder currently is the holder of shares of
the common stock, no par value per share, of the Company, which
shares at the Effective Time (as defined in the Merger
Agreement) will be converted into cash, shares of the common
stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Parent (Parent
Common Stock) and warrants to purchase shares of
Parent Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the Merger
Agreement.
WHEREAS, as an inducement for and a condition to Parent agreeing
to enter into the Merger Agreement and in consideration of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, concurrently
with the execution of the Merger Agreement, each of the
Stockholders has agreed to enter into this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
premises, representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Definitions. Capitalized terms
used and not otherwise defined herein but which are defined in
the Merger Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to them in
the Merger Agreement, unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise. The following terms, as used herein, have the
following meanings:
Acquisition Transaction means any
merger, reorganization, recapitalization, consolidation, share
exchange, business combination or other similar transaction
involving Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.
Affiliate means, with respect to any
Person, any other Person that directly, or indirectly through
one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is
under common control with, such first Person.
Beneficial Owner has the meaning set
forth in
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, and derivative terms such as
Beneficially Own, Beneficially Owned,
and Beneficially Ownership shall be given
corresponding meanings.
Business Day means any day that is not
a Saturday, a Sunday or other day on which banks are required or
authorized by Law to be closed in the states of New York,
California, or the country of Germany.
control, including the terms
controlled by and under common
control with, means the possession, directly or
indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the
management and policies of a Person, whether through the
ownership of voting securities, as trustee or executor, as
general partner or managing member, by contract or otherwise,
including the ownership, directly or indirectly, of securities
having the power to elect a majority of the board of directors
or similar body governing the affairs of such Person
DGCL means the Delaware General
Corporation Law.
Director means a member of Parent
Board.
Exchange Act means the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Group means a group within the meaning
of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act.
C-1
Parent Board means the board of
directors of Parent.
Person means an individual,
corporation, partnership, limited liability company, limited
liability partnership, syndicate, person, trust, association,
organization or other entity, including any governmental entity,
and including any successor, by merger or otherwise, of any of
the foregoing.
Shares means (i) any shares of
Parent Common Stock and any other securities of Parent,
including, options, warrants (including the New Acquiror
Warrants) and rights, and any other securities that are
convertible, exercisable or exchangeable for shares of Parent
Common Stock (including shares of the capital stock of the
Company that will be converted into securities of Parent as a
result of the Merger), in each case, that are Beneficially Owned
by a Stockholder as of immediately after the Effective Time and
(ii) any shares of Parent Common Stock or other securities
of Parent that are or become Beneficially Owned or acquired by a
Stockholder or any of its Affiliates in any capacity or form
after the Effective Time and prior to the termination of this
Agreement, whether upon the exercise of options, warrants
(including the New Acquiror Warrants) or rights, the conversion
or exchange of convertible or exchangeable securities, or by
means of purchase, dividend, distribution,
split-up,
recapitalization, merger, reorganization, consolidation,
combination, exchange of shares or the like, gift, bequest,
inheritance or as a successor in interest in any capacity or
otherwise.
Subsidiary means, with respect to any
Person, any other Person controlled by such first Person,
directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries. All
references in this Agreement to the Subsidiaries of a Person
shall be deemed to include all direct and indirect Subsidiaries
of such Person.
Transfer means (i) offer for
sale, sell, transfer, tender, pledge, encumber, assign or
otherwise dispose of, or enter into any contract, option or
other arrangement or understanding with respect to, or consent
to the offer for sale, sale, transfer, tender, pledge,
encumbrance, assignment or other disposition of, any security or
any interest therein; (ii) grant any proxies or powers of
attorney with respect to any security or deposit any security
into a voting trust or enter into a voting agreement with
respect to any security.
2. Effective Date. This Agreement
shall automatically and immediately become effective at, and not
before, the Effective Time, as such term is defined in the
Merger Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, this Agreement
shall not become effective, shall have no force or effect, and
shall be null and void.
3. Representations and Warranties of the
Stockholder. Each Stockholder represents and
warrants to Parent that:
a. Ownership of
Shares. Stockholder will be as of the
Effective Time the sole record and Beneficial Owner of the
number of Shares listed on Schedule 3.1(a) opposite
such Stockholders name and such Shares constitute all of
the shares of capital stock or other voting securities of Parent
held (or that will be held) of record or Beneficially Owned by
such Stockholder as of the date hereof, subject to update
pursuant to the last sentence of this Section 3.1(a).
Stockholder has sole voting power and sole power of disposition,
sole power of conversion, sole power to demand appraisal rights
and sole power to agree to all of the matters set forth in this
Agreement, in each case with respect to all of the Shares with
no limitations, qualifications or restrictions on such rights,
subject to applicable securities laws, and the terms of this
Agreement. Stockholder will promptly provide written notice to
Parent in the event the Stockholder acquires Beneficial
Ownership of any additional Shares after the date hereof and a
description thereof, and Schedule 3.1(a) shall be
updated to reflect such acquisitions, and the representations
made in this Section 3.1(a) shall apply to such
updated Schedule as of the date of any such acquisition.
b. Authorization; Binding
Agreement. Stockholder has the legal
capacity, power and authority to enter into and perform all of
Shareholders obligations under this Agreement. The
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by
Stockholder has been duly authorized by all necessary action.
This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered
by Stockholder and constitutes a valid and binding agreement of
Shareholder, enforceable against Stockholder in accordance with
its terms, subject to any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium or similar laws now or hereafter in
effect relating to creditors rights generally or to
general principles of equity.
C-2
c. No Conflict. The execution,
delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Stockholder
does not and will not violate, conflict with, result in a breach
of, or constitute a default (or an event that, without the
giving of notice or the lapse of time, or both, would constitute
a default) under (a) formation documents, if any, of the
Stockholder, (b) any applicable law, rule, regulation,
judgment, injunction, order or decree binding upon the
Stockholder or any of its assets or properties, except for any
such violations which would be immaterial to Parent or the
Stockholder, or (c) any agreement or other instrument
binding upon such Stockholder.
4. Standstill. From and after the
date of this Agreement until the third (3rd) anniversary of the
Closing Date (the Standstill Period), each
Stockholder agrees that it shall not, and shall cause its
Affiliates not to, except within the terms of a specific written
consent from Parent, (i) propose or disclose an intent to
propose, or enter into or agree to enter into, singly or with
any other Person or directly or indirectly, or encourage others
to propose or enter into, any Acquisition Transaction or any
other form of restructuring, merger, tender offer,
recapitalization or similar transaction with respect to Parent
or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) acquire, or offer, propose
or agree to acquire, by purchase or otherwise, record or
Beneficial Ownership of any securities of Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries, if, as a result thereof, such Stockholder,
together with its Affiliates and any members of a Group in which
such Stockholder is a member, would, in the aggregate,
Beneficially Own shares of Parent Common Stock representing more
than 10% of the total then outstanding shares of Parent Common
Stock; provided, however, that for purposes of this
Section 4, the Stockholders shall not be deemed a
Group based solely upon being parties to this Agreement and
performing their obligations hereunder, (iii) make,
encourage or in any way participate in, any solicitation of
proxies with respect to any voting securities of Parent or any
of its Subsidiaries (including by the execution of action by
written consent), encourage or become a participant in any
election contest with respect to Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries, seek to encourage or influence any Person with
respect to any such voting securities or demand a copy of the
list of the stockholders or other books and records of Parent or
any of its Subsidiaries, (iv) participate in or encourage
the formation of any partnership, syndicate or other group which
owns or seeks or offers to acquire Beneficial Ownership of any
such voting securities or which seeks to affect control of
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or has the purpose of
circumventing any provision of this Agreement, or
(v) otherwise act, alone or in concert with others
(including by providing financing for another Person), to seek
or to offer to control or influence, in any manner, the
management, the Board or policies of Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries. For the avoidance of doubt, the restrictions on
the acquisition of additional securities set forth in this
Section 4.1 shall not (A) apply to
participation by the Stockholder in issuances of securities
pursuant to the granting or exercise of employee stock options
or other stock incentives pursuant to Parents stock
incentive plans, (B) restrict the ability of any member of
the Parent Board of Directors who is affiliated with any
Stockholder from performing his or her duties as a director of
Parent and acting in his or her capacity as a director of
Parent, including without limitation, carrying out his or her
fiduciary duties to the stockholders of Parent, or
(C) apply to the exercise of any Acquiror Warrants held by
Stockholder.
5. Lock-Up;
Transfers.
a. Each of the parties set forth on
Schedule 5(a) attached hereto (each, a
Locked-Up
Party) hereby agrees that, without the prior written
consent of Parent, he, she or it shall not from and after the
date of this Agreement until the second (2nd) anniversary of the
Closing Date (the
Lock-Up
Period), directly or indirectly Transfer any Shares
received by such
Locked-Up
Party pursuant to the Merger, and shall not (i) offer,
pledge, sell or contract to sell any option or contract to
purchase any of such Shares; (ii) contract to purchase or
purchase any option or contract to sell any of such Shares;
(iii) grant any option, right or warrant for the sale of
any of such Shares; (iv) lend or otherwise dispose of (or
enter into any transaction or device designed to, or that could
be expected to, result in the disposition by any person at any
time in the future of) any of such Shares or securities
convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for Shares; or
(v) enter into a swap or other derivatives transaction or
agreement that transfers, in whole or in part (directly or
indirectly), the economic consequences of ownership of any
shares of such Shares, whether any such swap or transaction
described in clauses (i) through (v) is to be settled
by delivery of shares Parent Common Stock or other securities,
in cash or otherwise, or (vi) announce his, her or its
intention to do any of the foregoing (any of the transactions
described in clauses (i) through (vi), a Common
Stock Transaction); provided, that, subject to
any other applicable restrictions, (i) after the one
(1) year anniversary of the Closing Date, such
Locked-Up
Party may enter into a Common Stock Transaction with respect to
up to 33.3% of the Shares received by such
Locked-Up
Party pursuant to the Merger, (ii) after the eighteen
(18) month anniversary of Closing Date, such
C-3
Locked-Up
Party may enter into a Common Stock Transaction with respect to
up to an additional 33.3% of the Shares received by such
Locked-Up
Party pursuant to the Merger, and (iii) after the two
(2) year anniversary of Closing Date, such
Locked-Up
Party may enter into a Common Stock Transaction with respect to
up to any remaining Shares received by the
Locked-Up
Party pursuant to the Merger.
b. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing contained herein
shall prevent a
Locked-Up
Party from, or restrict the ability of a
Locked-Up
Party to (i) exercise any options or other convertible
securities granted under the Acquiror incentive plans or
(ii) dispose of Shares which it Beneficially Owns (as such
concept is defined pursuant to
Rule 13d-3
of the Exchange Act) in connection with a transaction in which
all other holders of Parent Common Stock are entitled to receive
the same consideration for their shares of Shares as would be
received by the
Locked-Up
Party.
c. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each
Locked-Up
Party shall be permitted to Transfer the Securities during the
Lock-Up
Period (i) as a bona fide gift or gifts, (ii) to any
trust for the direct or indirect benefit of such
Locked-Up
Party or the immediate family of such
Locked-Up
Party, (iii) by will or intestate succession,
provided that, in each case, (a) each transferee (or
trustee, as applicable) executes an agreement in a form
reasonably satisfactory to Parent pursuant to which such
transferee agrees to be bound by each of the terms and
provisions of this Agreement as if such transferee were a
Stockholder and (b) any such Transfer shall not
involve a disposition for value. For purposes of this Section,
immediate family shall mean any relationship by
blood, marriage or adoption, not more remote than first cousin.
d. Each
Locked-Up
Party agrees that it will not request that Parent or
Parents transfer agent register the transfer (book-entry
or otherwise) of any certificate or uncertificated interest
representing any Shares. In furtherance of the foregoing, the
Parent, and any transfer agent for the registration or transfer
of the shares of Parent Common Stock, are hereby authorized to
decline to make any transfer of the shares of Shares if such
transfer would constitute a violation or breach of this
Agreement.
6. Election of Directors.
a. Subject to applicable law and stock exchange and
securities market rules and except as otherwise expressly
provided herein, from and after the date of this Agreement until
the third (3rd) anniversary of the Closing Date, at each meeting
of the stockholders of Parent, or in any written consent, the
purpose of electing directors of Parent (and at any other time
at which the stockholders of Parent shall have the right to
elect directors of Parent), each Stockholder hereby irrevocably
agrees to vote or cause to be voted, all Shares for which such
Stockholder is entitled to vote or other shares for which such
Stockholder has the right to vote or direct the voting, in each
case as of the applicable record date
and/or
meeting date of such meeting or as of the date of the written
consent, and take or cause to be taken such other actions, as
may be required from time to time to: (i) elect any
director nominee that is recommended by a majority of the Parent
Board or the nominating committee thereof, (ii) remove any
director in the manner allowed by law and Parent governing
documents when such removal is requested for any reason, with or
without cause, by a majority of the Parent Board or the
nominating committee thereof, or (iii) oppose the removal
of any director unless such removal is in the manner allowed by
law and Parents governing documents and is requested,
approved or recommended by a majority of the Parent Board or the
nominating committee thereof; provided, that, at any time
at which the stockholders of Parent have the right to elect
directors of Parent and Larry Midland is nominated for election
as a director of Parent, or such individual is a director of
Parent and may be subject to a vote for removal, the
Stockholders may vote in their discretion with respect to (but
only with respect to) such individual regardless of the
recommendation by a majority of the Parent Board or the
nominating committee thereof; provided, further,
that the obligations of this Section 6, shall terminate in
the event that (i) Larry Midland is not nominated by the
Parent Board for re-election at the 2009 annual meeting of
stockholders of Parent, or (ii) Larry Midland is
involuntarily removed without cause from the Parent Board, other
that due to his resignation, death, disability or by the vote of
the stockholders of Parent in which a majority of the shares of
Parent Common Stock held by the former shareholders of the
Company have voted for such removal for cause.
b. Stockholder hereby constitutes and appoints Parent,
which shall act through any of its officers (the Proxy
Holder), with full power of substitution, its true and
lawful proxy and attorney-in-fact to vote in accordance with the
provisions of Section 6(a) hereof at any meeting (and any
adjournment or postponement thereof) of Parents
stockholders called for purposes of considering any board
nominations or elections described in Section 6(a) above,
C-4
or to execute a written consent of stockholders in lieu of any
such meeting, all Shares for which Stockholder is entitled to
vote or for which Stockholder has the right to vote or direct
the voting, as of the relevant record date or meeting date or
written consent. Upon the request of Parent, Shareholder shall
cause a similar proxy to be granted by any other record holder
of any Shareholder Shares as to which Shareholder has a
beneficial interest or the right to vote or direct the voting.
c. The proxy and power of attorney granted herein shall be
irrevocable during the term of this Section 6, shall be
deemed to be coupled with an interest sufficient in law to
support an irrevocable proxy and shall revoke all prior proxies
granted by Stockholder. Stockholder shall not grant any proxy to
any person which conflicts with the proxy granted herein, and
any attempt to do so shall be void. The power of attorney
granted herein is a durable power of attorney and shall survive
the death or incapacity of Stockholder.
d. If Stockholder fails for any reason to vote his, her or
its Stockholder Shares in accordance with the requirements of
Section 6(a) hereof, then the Proxy Holder shall have the
right to vote the Shareholder Shares at any meeting of the
Companys shareholders and in any action by written consent
of the Companys shareholders in accordance with the
provisions of Section 6(a) hereof. The vote of the Proxy
Holder shall control in any conflict between a vote of such
Shares by the Proxy Holder and a vote of such Shares by
Stockholder.
e. The Stockholders shall take any and all actions and make
all filings as required by and in compliance with applicable law
and stock exchange and securities market rules, including
Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, resulting from and
necessary to perform the obligations herein.
7. Restrictive Legend. Until
transferred pursuant to Section 9(c)(i) or, if applicable,
Section 9(c)(ii), each certificate representing Shares and
any other securities issued upon any stock split, stock
dividend, recapitalization, merger, consolidation or similar
event, shall be stamped or otherwise imprinted with legends in
the following form (in addition to any other legends required
under applicable securities laws):
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO
A STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STOCKHOLDER AND THE
CORPORATION, A COPY OF WHICH IS ON FILE WITH THE SECRETARY OF
THE CORPORATION AND MAY BE TRANSFERRED AND VOTED ONLY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CERTAIN TERMS AND RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH
AGREEMENT.
8. Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed
duly given (a) on the date of delivery if delivered
personally, or if by facsimile, upon written confirmation of
receipt by facsimile, (b) on the first (1st) Business Day
following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized courier under circumstances in which such courier
guarantees
next-day
delivery (except in the case of overseas delivery, in which case
notice shall be deemed duly given on the third (3rd) Business
Day following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized international courier under circumstances in which
such courier guarantees such delivery) or (c) on the
earlier of confirmed receipt or the fifth Business Day following
the date of mailing if delivered by registered or certified
mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid (except in the
case of overseas delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed
duly given on confirmed receipt if delivered by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid). All
notices hereunder shall be delivered to the addresses set forth
below, or pursuant to such other instructions as may be
designated in writing by the party to receive such notice:
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13,
85737, Ismaning Germany
Attention: Felix Marx
Facsimile: +49.89.9595.5170
C-5
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105
Attention: Michael L. Reed
Facsimile: 415.374.8459
(ii) if to Stockholder, to the address of s set forth on
the signature page hereto.
9. Miscellaneous
a. Entire Agreement. This
Agreement constitutes the entire agreement, and supersede all
prior written agreements, arrangements, communications and
understandings and all prior and contemporaneous oral
agreements, arrangements, communications and understandings
among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
thereof.
b. Amendments and Waivers. This
Agreement may not be amended, modified or supplemented in any
manner, whether by course of conduct or otherwise, except by an
instrument in writing specifically designated as an amendment
hereto, signed on behalf of Parent and Stockholders that hold a
majority of the shares of Parent Common Stock held by all
Stockholders at the time of such amendment. Any agreement on the
part of a party to any waiver shall be valid only if set forth
in a written instrument executed and delivered by such party. No
failure or delay of any party in exercising any right or remedy
hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any
single or partial exercise of any such right or power, or any
abandonment or discontinuance of steps to enforce such right or
power, or any course of conduct, preclude any other or further
exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right or power.
The rights and remedies of the parties hereunder are cumulative
and are not exclusive of any rights or remedies which they would
otherwise have hereunder.
c. Transferees. Each Stockholder
agrees that this Agreement and the obligations hereunder shall
attach to the Shares held by such Stockholder and shall be
binding upon any person to whom legal or Beneficial Ownership of
any such Shares shall pass, whether by Transfer, operation of
law or otherwise, other than through a sale (i) on a stock
exchange or similar market mechanism or (ii) pursuant to
Section 5(b)(ii) hereof. Notwithstanding any
Transfer of Stockholder Shares, the transferor shall remain
liable for the performance of all of his, her or its obligations
under this Agreement. At any time during the term of this
Agreement, in the event of any permitted Transfer of Securities,
other than through a sale on a stock exchange or similar market
mechanism, each transferee (or trustee, as applicable) must
execute an agreement in a form satisfactory to Parent pursuant
to which such transferee agrees to be bound by each of the terms
and provisions of this Agreement as if such transferee were a
Stockholder.
d. Parties in Interest. Other than
the parties and their respective successors and permitted
assigns and the other parties to whom rights and remedies are
expressly provided under this Agreement, this Agreement shall
not create any third party beneficiary rights or remedies in any
person.
e. Headings. The headings
contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and
shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement.
f. Interpretation;
Definitions. When a reference is made in this
Agreement to a Section, Article or Exhibit such reference shall
be to a Section, Article or Exhibit of this Agreement unless
otherwise indicated. The headings contained in this Agreement
are for convenience of reference purposes only and shall not
affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this
Agreement. All words used in this Agreement will be construed to
be of such gender or number as the circumstances require. The
word including and words of similar import when used
in this Agreement will mean including, without
limitation, unless otherwise specified. All terms defined
in this Agreement shall have the defined meanings when used in
any certificate or other document made or delivered pursuant
thereto unless otherwise defined therein. The definitions
contained in this Agreement are applicable to the singular as
well as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as
well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such term. Any
statute defined or referred to herein means such statute as from
time to time amended, modified or supplemented, including by
succession of comparable successor statutes and references to
all attachments thereto
C-6
and instruments incorporated therein. References to a Person
are also to its permitted successors and assigns. Each of the
parties has participated in the drafting and negotiation of this
Agreement. If an ambiguity or question of intent or
interpretation arises, this Agreement must be construed as if it
is drafted by all of the parties, and no presumption or burden
of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue
of authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
g. Specific Performance. Each
Stockholder agrees that Parent would suffer irreparable damage
in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were
not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were
otherwise breached. Accordingly, Parent shall be entitled to
specific performance of the terms hereof, including an
injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement
and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this
Agreement in any court, this being in addition to any other
remedy to which such party is entitled at law or in equity. Each
Stockholder hereby further waives (a) any defense in any
action for specific performance that a remedy at law would be
adequate and (b) any requirement under any law to post
security as a prerequisite to obtaining equitable relief.
h. Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the Laws
of the State of Delaware, without regard to the conflicts of
laws provisions thereof that would apply the laws of any other
state.
i. Submission to
Jurisdiction. Each of the parties irrevocably
agrees that any legal action or proceeding arising out of or
relating to this Agreement brought by any other party or its
successors or assigns shall be brought and determined in any
Delaware State or federal court sitting in the state of
Delaware, and each of the parties hereby irrevocably submits to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the aforesaid courts for itself
and with respect to its property, generally and unconditionally,
with regard to any such action or proceeding arising out of or
relating to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby. Each of the parties agrees not to commence any action,
suit or proceeding relating thereto except in the courts
described above in Delaware, other than actions in any court of
competent jurisdiction to enforce any judgment, decree or award
rendered by any such court in Delaware as described herein. Each
of the parties further agrees that notice as provided herein
shall constitute sufficient service of process and the parties
further waive any argument that such service is insufficient.
Each of the parties hereby irrevocably and unconditionally
waives, and agrees not to assert, by way of motion or as a
defense, counterclaim or otherwise, in any action or proceeding
arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby, (a) any claim that it is not
personally subject to the jurisdiction of the courts in Delaware
as described herein for any reason, (b) that it or its
property is exempt or immune from jurisdiction of any such court
or from any legal process commenced in such courts (whether
through service of notice, attachment prior to judgment,
attachment in aid of execution of judgment, execution of
judgment or otherwise) and (c) that (i) the suit,
action or proceeding in any such court is brought in an
inconvenient forum, (ii) the venue of such suit, action or
proceeding is improper or (iii) this Agreement, or the
subject matter hereof, may not be enforced in or by such courts.
j. Waiver of Jury Trial. EACH OF
THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ALL
RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR
COUNTERCLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE
TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
k. Severability. Whenever
possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this
Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective
and valid under applicable law, but if any provision or portion
of any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid,
illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any applicable Law
or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or
unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or portion
of any provision in such jurisdiction, and this Agreement shall
be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction as if
such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision or portion of
any provision had never been contained herein.
l. Stockholder
Acknowledgment. Stockholder acknowledges and
agrees that he has had the opportunity to consult legal counsel
in regard to this Agreement, that he has read and understands
this Agreement, that he is fully aware of its legal effect, and
that he has entered into it freely and voluntarily and based on
his own judgment and not on any representations, warranties or
promises other than those contained in this Agreement.
C-7
m. Further Assurances. Each of the
parties agrees to execute, acknowledge, deliver and perform, and
cause to be executed, acknowledged, delivered and performed, at
any time and from time to time, as the case may be, all such
further acts, deeds, assignments, transfers, conveyances, powers
of attorney and assurances as may be reasonably necessary to
carry out the provisions or intent of this Agreement
n. Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall
be considered one and the same instrument and shall become
effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each
of the parties and delivered to the other party. This Agreement
may be executed by facsimile signature and a facsimile signature
shall constitute an original for all purposes.
[Signature
page follows]
C-8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed by their respective authorized
officers as of the date first written above.
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
Felix Marx
Chief Executive Officer
MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS:
MIDLAND FAMILY TRUST EST JAN 29 2002
L. W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR ASHLEY
MARIE MIDLAND UCGMA
L. W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
C-9
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR ALISON
MIDLAND UCGMA
L. W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR TAYLOR
ANN MIDLAND UCGMA
L. W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR
MADISON KATHLEEN MIDLAND UCGMA
L. W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Name: Larry Midland
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
C-10
MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS:
JOHN W. PICCININNI
Address:
47 Shearwater Pl.
Newport Beach, CA 92660
MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS:
/s/ Robert
P. Beliles, Jr.
ROBERT P. BELILES, JR.
Address:
29 Cherry Hills Dr.
Coto de Caza, CA 92679
MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS:
/s/ Robert
C. Zivney, Jr.
ROBERT C. ZIVNEY, JR.
Address:
18 MacKenzie Lane
Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679
ROBERT C. ZIVNEY & MARJORIE J. ZIVNEY
TTEE U/A DTD JAN 10, 2008 ZIVNEY FAMILY
TRUST
/s/ Robert
C. Zivney, Jr., Trustee
ROBERT C. ZIVNEY, JR., Trustee
C-11
/s/ Marjorie
J. Zivney, Trustee
MARJORIE J. ZIVNEY, Trustee
Address:
18 MacKenzie Lane
Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679
OTHER STOCKHOLDERS:
MAURY POLNER AND VIVIAN A. POLNER,
AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE POLNER LIVING
TRUST ESTABLISHED JUNE 8, 2000:
/s/ Maury
Polner, Co-Trustee
MAURY POLNER, Co-Trustee
/s/ Vivian
A. Polner, Co-Trustee
VIVIAN A. POLNER, Co-Trustee
Address:
44-647 S. Heritage
Palms Dr.
Indio, CA 92201
OTHER STOCKHOLDERS:
MAURY POLNER AND VIVIAN A. POLNER,
AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE POLNER LIVING
TRUST ESTABLISHED JUNE 8, 2000:
/s/ Maury
Polner, Co-Trustee
MAURY POLNER, Co-Trustee
C-12
VIVIAN A. POLNER, Co-Trustee
Address:
44-647 S. Heritage
Palms Dr.
Indio, CA 92201
MAURY POLNER
OTHER STOCKHOLDERS:
DOUGLAS J. MORGAN
Address:
7600 S. Rainbow Blvd., #1129
Las Vegas, NV 89139
PERFORMANCE STRATEGIES INC. PROFIT
SHARING PLAN & TRUST
DOUGLAS J. MORGAN, Trustee
Address:
7600 S. Rainbow Blvd., #1129
Las Vegas, NV 89139
C-13
OTHER STOCKHOLDERS:
THE MAK FAMILY TRUST DTD 11/27/79
EUGENE Y. K. MAK, Trustee
Address:
32681 Mediterranean Dr.
Dana Point, CA 92629
EUGENE Y. K. MAK
OTHER STOCKHOLDERS:
PTC CUST IRA FBO EUGENE Y. K. MAK
EUGENE Y. K. MAK
Address:
32681 Mediterranean Dr.
Dana Point, CA 92629
[Signature
Page to Stockholder Agreement]
C-14
SCHEDULE 3.1(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder
|
|
Address
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Robert P. Beliles, Jr.
|
|
29 Cherry Hills Dr.
Coto de Caza, CA 92679
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
The Mak Family Trust Dtd 11/27/79
|
|
32681 Mediterranean Dr.
Dana Point, CA 92629
|
|
|
80,333
|
|
PTC CUST IRA FBO EUGENE Y. K. MAK
|
|
32681 Mediterranean Dr.
Dana Point, CA 92629
|
|
|
71,748
|
|
Midland Family Trust Est Jan 29 2002
|
|
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
|
|
|
619,800
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Ashley
Marie Midland UCGMA
|
|
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Alison
Midland UCGMA
|
|
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Taylor
Ann Midland UCGMA
|
|
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for
Madison Kathleen Midland UCGMA
|
|
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
Douglas J. Morgan
|
|
7600 S. Rainbow Blvd., #1129
Las Vegas, NV 89139
|
|
|
108,104
|
|
Performance Strategies Inc. Profit Sharing
Plan & Trust (Doug Morgan)
|
|
7600 S. Rainbow Blvd., #1129
Las Vegas, NV 89139
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
John W. Piccininni
|
|
47 Shearwater Pl.
Newport Beach, CA 92660
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Maury Polner and Vivian A. Polner,
as Co-Trustees of The Polner Living Trust Established
June 8, 2000
|
|
44-647 S. Heritage Palms Dr.
Indio, CA 92201
|
|
|
76,000
|
|
Robert C. Zivney, Jr.
|
|
18 MacKenzie Lane
Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
Robert C. Zivney & Marjorie J. Zivney
TTEE U/A Dtd Jan 10, 2008 Zivney Family Trust
|
|
18 MacKenzie Lane
Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
C-15
SCHEDULE 5(a)
LOCKED-UP
PARTIES
|
|
|
|
|
Larry Midland
|
|
|
|
Midland Family Trust Est Jan 29, 2002
|
|
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Ashley Marie Midland UGMA
|
|
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Alison Midland UGMA
|
|
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Taylor Ann Midland UGMA
|
|
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Madison Kathleen Midland
|
C-16
Annex D
SCM
MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
WARRANT
CERTIFICATE
THIS CERTIFIES THAT, for value
received, is
the registered holder (the Holder) of
the number of Warrants stated herein, expiring at
5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, [5 YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF CLOSING
DATE], 2014, to purchase one (1) fully paid and
non-assessable share of common stock, par value $.001 per share
(Common Stock), of SCM Microsystems, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), for each
Warrant evidenced by this Warrant Certificate.
1. Exercise Price
a. The Warrants shall entitle the registered Holder of this
Warrant Certificate, subject to the provisions of this Warrant
Certificate, to purchase from the Company the number of shares
of Common Stock stated herein, at the price of $3.00 per whole
share, subject to the adjustments provided in Section 4
hereof (the Exercise Price).
b. No fraction of a share of Common Stock will be issued
upon any exercise of any Warrant. If the registered Holder would
be entitled to receive a fraction of a share of Common Stock
upon any exercise of a Warrant, the Company shall, upon such
exercise, pay to the registered Holder an amount of cash equal
to the product of such fraction multiplied by the Current Market
Price on the date of such exercise. The Current Market
Value shall mean the volume weighted average of the
reported closing price (or, if no closing sale price is
reported, the average of the bid and ask prices, or, if more
than one in either case, the average of the average bid and the
average asked prices) per share of the Common Stock for the
thirty (30) trading days ending on the trading day
immediately preceding the date as of which such value is to be
determined, as reported in composite transactions for the NASDAQ
Stock Market or, if the shares of Common Stock are not listed
for trading on such stock exchange, the price determined in good
faith by the Board of Directors of the Company.
c. Upon any exercise of the Warrants evidenced by this
Warrant Certificate for less than the total number of Warrants
evidenced by this Warrant Certificate, there shall be issued to
the registered Holder hereof a new Warrant Certificate covering
the number of Warrants for which this Warrant Certificate has
not been exercised.
2. Duration of Warrants. Each
Warrant evidenced by this Warrant Certificate may be exercised
only during the period (Exercise Period)
commencing on [3 YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF CLOSING DATE], 2012, and
terminating at 5:00 p.m., Pacific time, on [5 YEAR
ANNIVERSARY OF CLOSING DATE], 2014, (the Expiration
Date). Each Warrant evidenced by this Warrant
Certificate that is not exercised on or before the Expiration
Date shall become void, and all rights in and to any such
Warrant and this Warrant Certificate shall cease at the close of
business on the Expiration Date. Neither the Transfer Agent, nor
the Company or any of its directors, officers or other
affiliates, shall have any obligation to inform or remind the
Holder of the expiration of any of the Warrants.
3. Exercise of Warrants.
a. The registered Holder (and only the registered Holder)
may exercise all or any portion of the Warrants evidenced by
this Warrant Certificate by delivering, not later than
5:00 P.M., Pacific time, on any Business Day during the
Exercise Period (the Exercise Date) to
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company (the
Transfer Agent, which term includes any
successor Transfer Agent) at its corporate trust department
at ,
each of the following: (i) this Warrant Certificate,
(ii) a subscription form substantially in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit A (the Subscription
Form) which has been duly and properly executed by the
registered Holder, (iii) an amount equal to the aggregate
Exercise Price for the number of full shares of Common Stock as
to which Warrants are exercised, and (iv) any and all
applicable withholding taxes due in connection with the exercise
of the Warrants.
b. If any of (i) this Warrant Certificate,
(ii) the Subscription Form, or (iii) the applicable
aggregate Exercise Price with respect to any exercise of
Warrants is received by the Transfer Agent after 5:00 P.M.,
Pacific time, the Warrants to be exercised will be deemed to
have been received for exercise and exercised on the Business
Day next
D-1
succeeding the date on which all such items were received and
such date shall be the Exercise Date for purposes hereof. If the
date such items are received is not a Business Day, the Warrants
to be exercised will be deemed to be received for exercise and
exercised on the next succeeding day that is a Business Day and
such date shall be the Exercise Date. If any Warrants to be
exercised are received or deemed to have been received after
5:00 P.M., Pacific time, on the Expiration Date, the
exercise of such Warrants will be null and void and any funds
delivered to the Transfer Agent will be returned to the
registered Holder as soon as reasonably practicable. In no event
will interest accrue on any funds paid to or deposited with the
Transfer Agent in respect of any exercise or attempted exercise
of any Warrants. The validity of any exercise of Warrants will
be determined in good faith by the Transfer Agent in its sole
discretion and such determination will be final and binding upon
the Holder and the Company, subject to manifest error. In the
event the Transfer Agent determines any exercise of Warrants to
be invalid, the Transfer Agent will use commercially reasonable
efforts to provide notice of such determination and its basis
for such determination to the Holder; provided that
neither the Company nor any of its directors, officers or
affiliates shall have any obligation to inform the Holder of the
invalidity of any exercise of Warrants; provided,
further, that none of the Transfer Agent, the Company or
any of their respective directors, officers or affiliates shall
have any liability whatsoever to Holder or any of Holders
successors or assigns as a result of any determination as to the
validity or invalidity of any exercise of Warrants or any
failure or delay in providing any such notice, other than the
obligation to effect the exercise of Warrants upon a showing of
manifest error pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence.
c. As used herein, the term Business Day
means any day that is not a Saturday or Sunday and is not a
United States federal holiday or a day on which banking
institutions generally are authorized or obligated by law or
regulation to close in New York.
d. The Company and the Transfer Agent may deem and treat
the registered Holder as the sole and absolute owner of this
Warrant Certificate (notwithstanding any notation of ownership
or other writing hereon made by anyone), for the purpose of any
exercise of any Warrant evidenced by this Warrant Certificate,
of any distribution with respect to any Warrants evidenced by
this Warrant Certificate, and for all other purposes, and
neither the Company, nor the Transfer Agent, shall be affected
by any notice to the contrary.
4. Adjustments. In the event the
Company shall fix a record date for the effectuation of a
reclassification, split or subdivision of the outstanding shares
of Common Stock or the determination of the holders of Common
Stock entitled to receive a dividend or other distribution
payable to all holders of the Common Stock in additional shares
of Common Stock or other securities or rights convertible into,
or entitling all holders of the outstanding Common Stock to
receive directly or indirectly, additional shares of Common
Stock (Common Stock Equivalents), in each
case, without payment of any consideration by holders for the
additional shares of Common Stock or Common Stock Equivalents
(including the additional shares of Common Stock issuable upon
conversion or exercise thereof) (collectively, a
Distribution), then, as of such record date (or the
date of such dividend, distribution, split or subdivision if no
record date is fixed), the Exercise Price per share of Common
Stock shall be appropriately decreased and the number of shares
of Common Stock issuable upon any exercise subsequent to such
adjustment of any Warrants evidenced by this Warrant Certificate
shall be appropriately increased, in both cases in the same
proportion as the increase in the outstanding shares of Common
Stock due to the Distribution. If the number of shares of Common
Stock outstanding shall be decreased by a combination of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock or similar event (a
Combination), the Exercise Price per share of
Common Stock shall be appropriately increased and the number of
shares of Common Stock issuable upon any exercise subsequent to
such adjustment of any Warrants evidenced by this Warrant
Certificate shall be appropriately decreased, in both cases in
the same proportion as the decrease in outstanding shares of
Common Stock due to the Combination. If any Distribution,
Combination or other split, subdivision, dividend or
distribution of the type described in this Section 4 is
declared but not made, the number of shares of Common Stock
issuable upon the exercise of any Warrants evidenced by this
Warrant Certificate and the applicable Exercise Price per share
of Common Stock shall again be adjusted to that number of shares
of Common Stock that would be issuable upon exercise of each
Warrant and the Exercise Price that would have been in effect if
such Distribution, Combination or other split, subdivision,
dividend or distribution had not been declared. As soon as
reasonably practicable after any such Distribution or
Combination, unless information regarding the Distribution or
Combination is publicly available, the Company will use
commercially reasonable efforts to provide notice to the Holder
(at the address of such Holder in the Companys records) of
any such Distribution or Combination; provided, that
neither the Company nor any of its directors,
D-2
officers or affiliates shall have any liability to Holder or any
of Holders successors or assigns as a result of any
failure or delay in providing any such notice.
5. Merger, Consolidation or
Sale. If at any time there shall be a sale of
all or substantially all of the Companys properties and
assets to any other person, or a merger or consolidation of the
Company with and into another corporation pursuant to which the
Company is not the surviving entity and stockholders of the
Company immediately prior to such merger or consolidation
control less than 50% of the voting securities of the surviving
corporation (a Sale), then, as a part of such
Sale, lawful and reasonable provision shall be made so that the
Holder of this Warrant shall thereafter be entitled to receive,
upon exercise and surrender, if required, of the Warrants
evidenced by this Warrant Certificate, during the period
specified herein in accordance with the terms of this Warrant
Certificate, the number of shares of common stock or other
securities or property of the surviving or successor corporation
resulting from the Sale that a holder of the shares deliverable
upon exercise of the Warrants evidenced by this Warrant
Certificate would have been entitled to receive in such Sale if
the Warrants evidenced by this Warrant Certificate had been
exercised immediately prior to the Sale. In any such case, if
necessary, appropriate adjustment shall be made to the Exercise
Price of the Warrants evidenced by this Warrant Certificate so
that the aggregate Exercise Price of the Warrants evidenced by
this Warrant Certificate (as adjusted in accordance with the
immediately preceding sentence) shall remain substantially the
same.
6. Transfer Restrictions. This
Warrant Certificate, the Warrants represented hereby and any and
all other rights hereunder are not transferable by the Holder
without the prior written consent of the Company. In order to
enforce the foregoing restriction, the Company may impose stop
transfer instructions with respect to the shares of Common Stock
issuable upon the exercise of any Warrant evidenced by this
Warrant Certificate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, subject to
providing prior written notice to the Company, the registered
Holder shall be permitted to transfer the Warrants evidenced by
this Warrant Certificate (a) as a bona fide gift or gifts,
(b) to any trust for the direct or indirect benefit of such
registered Holder or the immediate family of such registered
Holder, or (c) by will or intestate succession,
provided that, in each case, (i) the registered
Holder and such transferee comply with Section 7 hereof and
(ii) any such transfer shall not involve a disposition for
value. For purposes of this Section, immediate
family shall mean any relationship by blood, marriage or
adoption, not more remote than first cousin.
7. Transfer and Replacement Procedures.
a. In the event of a permitted transfer of any or all of
the Warrants evidenced by this Warrant Certificate, such
transfer will be made on the registry maintained for such
purpose at the principal office of the Company only upon
(i) surrender to the Company of this Warrant Certificate
duly and properly endorsed by the registered Holder,
(ii) payment by the Holder of any necessary transfer tax or
other governmental charge imposed upon such transfer (with
reasonable evidence of such payment provided to the Company),
and (iii) receipt by the Company from the registered Holder
and the proposed transferee of an Assignment Agreement
substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B
hereto that have been duly and properly executed by the
registered Holder and the transferee. Upon due presentment of
the items described in (i)-(iii) above, a new Warrant
Certificate or Warrant Certificates of like tenor and evidencing
in the aggregate a like number of Warrants as this Warrant
Certificate will be issued to the transferee and the registered
Holder, as applicable, in exchange for this Warrant Certificate
and thereafter this Warrant Certificate will be cancelled. Until
a transfer of this Warrant Certificate is duly registered on the
books of the Company, as described above, the Company may treat
the registered Holder hereof as the owner for all purposes.
b. Upon receipt by the Company of (i) evidence
reasonably satisfactory to it of the ownership of and the loss,
theft, destruction or mutilation of this Warrant Certificate,
(ii) in case of loss, theft or destruction, an indemnity
agreement
and/or
security from the registered Holder reasonably satisfactory to
the Company, (iii) in the case of mutilation, this Warrant
Certificate for surrender and cancellation, and
(iv) reimbursement from the Holder of all reasonable
expenses incidental thereto, the Company will make and deliver
to the registered Holder a new Warrant Certificate of like tenor
and evidencing in the aggregate a like number of Warrants as
this Warrant Certificate dated as of the date of such
cancellation (but without any change in the Expiration Date), in
lieu of this Warrant Certificate.
8. Share Rights. The accrual of
dividends, if any, on the shares of Common Stock issued upon the
exercise of any Warrant evidenced by this Warrant Certificate
will be governed by the terms generally applicable to Common
Stock. Neither this Warrant Certificate nor the Warrants
evidenced hereby shall entitle the any Holder hereof or
D-3
thereof to any of the rights of a holder of shares of Common
Stock, including, without limitation, the right to receive
dividends, if any, or payments upon the liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of the Company or to exercise any preemptive
rights to vote or to consent or to receive notice as
stockholders in respect of the meetings of stockholders or the
election of directors of the Company or any other matter.
9. Miscellaneous.
a. Authorized Shares. The Company
covenants that during the period that any Warrant remains
outstanding under this Warrant Certificate it will reserve from
its authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock a sufficient
number of shares of Common Stock to provide for the exercise of
the purchase rights under this Warrant Certificate.
b. Governing Law;
Construction. This Warrant Certificate shall
constitute a contract under the laws of the State of Delaware
and for all purposes shall be construed in accordance with and
governed by the laws of said state, without regard to any
principles of choice of law or conflicts of law. The descriptive
headings of the several sections of this Warrant Certificate are
inserted for convenience only and shall not control or affect
the meaning or construction of any of the provisions thereof.
c. Expiration. This Warrant
Certificate shall be void and any and all Warrants and other
rights represented hereby shall cease to the extent that the
Warrants are not exercised on or before the Expiration Date.
[Signature
Page Follows]
D-4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Warrant to be
duly executed as of the date set forth below.
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
Name:
,
2009
COUNTERSIGNED:
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER
AND TRUST COMPANY,
as Transfer Agent
Name:
D-5
Exhibit A
SUBSCRIPTION
FORM
(To Be
Executed by the Registered Holder in Order to Exercise Warrants)
The undersigned registered Holder of Warrant Certificate
number ,
hereby irrevocably elects to exercise Warrants
represented by such Warrant Certificate and to purchase the
shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of such
Warrants, and hereby requests that certificates for such shares
of Common Stock be issued in the name of and to be delivered to:
(PLEASE TYPE
OR PRINT NAME AND ADDRESS)
(SOCIAL SECURITY OR TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)
and, if such number of Warrants shall not be all the Warrants
evidenced by such Warrant Certificate, that a new Warrant
Certificate for the balance of such Warrants be registered in
the name of, and delivered to, the registered Holder at the
address stated below:
Dated:
(SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED HOLDER)
(TAX
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)
THE SIGNATURE ON THIS SUBSCRIPTION FORM MUST CORRESPOND TO
THE NAME WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE WARRANT CERTIFICATE IN
EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY
CHANGE WHATSOEVER, AND MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A COMMERCIAL BANK
OR TRUST COMPANY OR A MEMBER FIRM OF THE NASDAQ STOCK
EXCHANGE.
D-6
Exhibit B
ASSIGNMENT
AGREEMENT
(To Be
Executed by the Registered Holder in Order to Assign Warrants)
For value received, the undersigned registered Holder of Warrant
Certificate
number
hereby sells, assigns, and transfers unto:
(PLEASE TYPE
OR PRINT NAME AND ADDRESS OF TRANSFEREE)
(SOCIAL SECURITY OR TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF TRANSFEREE)
of
the Warrants represented by such Warrant Certificate, and hereby
irrevocably constitutes and appoints the Company, as its
attorney, to transfer this Warrant Certificate on the books of
the Company, with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated:
(SIGNATURE
OF REGISTERED HOLDER)
(TAX
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)
THE SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND TO THE NAME
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE WARRANT CERTIFICATE IN EVERY
PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE
WHATSOEVER, AND MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A COMMERCIAL BANK OR
TRUST COMPANY OR A MEMBER FIRM OF THE NASDAQ STOCK EXCHANGE.
The undersigned transferee of Warrants represented by such
Warrant Certificate hereby irrevocably agrees to be bound by the
terms and conditions of the Warrant Certificate and any Warrant
Certificate issued in replacement thereof.
Dated:
(SIGNATURE
OF REGISTERED HOLDER)
D-7
Annex E
|
|
|
|
|
Avondale Partners, LLC
Two American Center
3102 West End Avenue, Suite 1100
Nashville, TN
37203-1302
615.467.3483 Facsimile 615.467.3490
Wats 866.699.3530
|
December 9, 2008
Board of Directors
SCM Microsystems GmbH
Oskar-Messter-Str. 13
D-85737 Ismaning, Germany
Attention: Felix Marx, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Gentlemen:
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors
(the Board) of SCM Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Acquiror) in connection with the
proposed acquisition by the Acquiror of all of the outstanding
capital stock of Hirsch Electronics, a California corporation
(Company), through a first step merger of a
subsidiary of the Acquiror with and into the Company, followed
by a second step merger of the Company with and into a
subsidiary of the Acquiror, with the surviving entity to be a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror (the
Transaction). The Transaction is described more
fully in the draft Agreement and Plan of Merger by the Company
and the Acquiror (the Agreement). Capitalized terms
used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to those
terms in the Agreement.
You have requested our opinion as to whether, the Merger
Consideration to be paid by the Acquiror in the Transaction is
fair, from a financial point of view, to the Acquiror. Our
opinion does not address the relative merits of the Transaction
or any other potential alternatives with respect to the
Transaction being considered by the Board, nor does it address
the Boards decision to proceed with the Transaction.
In connection with our review of the Transaction, and in
arriving at our opinion, we have, among other things:
(1) Reviewed certain financial statements of the Company,
including the consolidated financial statements for recent years
and certain other relevant financial and operating data of the
Company made available to us by senior management of the Company;
(2) Reviewed a draft of the Agreement, dated
December 7, 2008;
(3) Compared the Company from a financial point of view
with certain publicly traded companies in the information
technology security and access control industries that we deemed
relevant;
(4) Considered the financial terms, to the extent publicly
available, of selected recent business combinations in the
information technology security and access control industries
that we deemed to be comparable, in whole or in part, to the
Transaction;
(5) Reviewed the financials terms, to the extent publicly
available, of certain other transactions we believed to be
reasonably comparable to the Transaction;
(6) Reviewed financial forecasts relating to the business
and prospects of the Company and the combined company prepared
by the respective managements of the Acquiror and the Company;
(7) Held discussions with senior management of the Acquiror
and the Company regarding the Companys operating history,
products and services, sales and marketing and the prospects of
the Company and the combined company;
E-1
SCM Microsystems GmbH
December 9, 2008
Page 2 of 3
(8) Taken into account our assessment of general economic,
market and financial and other conditions and our experience in
other transactions, as well as our expertise in securities
valuation and our knowledge of the industry in which the Company
operates; and
(9) Performed other such analyses and examinations and
considered such other information and financial criteria as we
have deemed appropriate.
We have not independently verified any of the financial or other
information and data concerning the Company considered by us in
connection with our review of the Transaction, and, for purposes
of the opinion set forth herein, we have assumed and relied upon
the accuracy and completeness of all such information and data
and further relied upon the assurances of management of the
Acquiror and the Company that they were not aware of any facts
that would make any of such information and data inaccurate or
misleading. With respect to the internal operating data and
financial analyses and forecasts supplied to us, we have assumed
that such data, analyses, and forecasts were reasonably prepared
on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and
judgments of the Acquirors and the Companys senior
management as to the recent and likely future performance of the
Company. Accordingly, we express no opinion with respect to such
analyses or forecasts and other information or the assumptions
on which they are based. In addition, we have not conducted a
physical inspection or appraisal of any of the assets,
properties or facilities of the Company, and we have not been
provided with an independent evaluation or appraisal of the
assets, properties, facilities or liabilities of the Company.
Our opinion is necessarily based upon market, economic,
financial and other conditions as they exist on, and can be
evaluated as of, the date of this letter. Any change in such
conditions would require a reevaluation of this opinion.
In connection with our opinion, we have assumed that the
Transaction will be consummated in a timely fashion on the terms
and subject to the conditions described in the Agreement,
without waiver or modification of any of the material terms or
conditions precedent to the Transaction contained in the
Agreement by any party thereto. We also have assumed that all
necessary governmental and regulatory approvals and third-party
consents will be obtained on terms and conditions that will not
have a material adverse effect on the Acquiror or the Company.
Management of the Acquiror has advised us, and we have also
assumed that the final Agreement will not differ materially from
the draft of the Agreement reviewed by us.
Avondale Partners, LLC, as part of its investment banking
services, is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses
and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, corporate restructurings, strategic alliances,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for
corporate and other purposes. We have acted as financial advisor
to the Board in connection with the Transaction and will receive
a fee for our services, a significant portion of which is
contingent upon consummation of the Transaction, and will
receive a fee for our services upon delivery of this opinion,
which fee is not contingent upon consummation of the
Transaction. In addition, the Acquiror has agreed to reimburse
us for certain expenses and indemnify us for certain liabilities
arising out of the rendering of this opinion. In the ordinary
course of its business, we and our affiliates (as a market maker
or otherwise) may trade or otherwise effect transactions in the
securities of the Acquiror, for our own account or for the
accounts of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold
a long or short position in such securities. Avondale Partners,
LLC has in the past provided investment banking, financial
advisory and other financial services to the Acquiror, for which
Avondale Partners, LLC received compensation, including, among
other things, having acted as exclusive sell-side advisor for
the Acquiror in the divestiture of one of its divisions and the
corresponding fairness opinion, for which we received
compensation. Avondale Partners, LLC may also provide investment
banking, financial advisory and other financial services to
affiliates of the Acquiror in the future, for which Avondale
Partners, LLC may receive compensation.
This opinion has been reviewed and approved by an Avondale
fairness opinion committee in conformity with our policies and
procedures established under the requirements of Rule 2290
of the NASD Rules of the Financial Institutions Regulatory
Authority. We have not been requested to opine as to, and this
opinion does not express an opinion as to or otherwise address
the fairness, financial or otherwise, of the amount or nature of
any compensation
E-2
SCM Microsystems GmbH
December 9, 2008
Page 3 of 3
to or consideration payable to or received by any officers,
directors or employees of any party to the Transaction, any
class of such persons or any other party, relative to the Merger
Consideration or otherwise.
We have not expressed any opinion as to the price at which the
common stock of the Acquiror may trade subsequent to the
announcement of the Transaction or as to the price at which the
common stock of the Acquiror may trade subsequent to the
consummation of the Transaction.
This letter and the opinion stated herein are solely for the use
of the Board of the Acquiror and may not be reproduced,
summarized, excerpted from or otherwise publicly referred to in
any manner without our prior written consent. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, we hereby consent to the inclusion of the full
text of our opinion and a summary thereof in any registration
statement or proxy statement relating to the Transaction used in
connection with the Transaction so long as the full text of the
opinion is quoted in such registration statement and proxy
statement and such summary is approved by us in advance in
writing.
This opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute a
recommendation to any stockholder of the Acquiror as to how such
stockholder should vote with respect to the Transaction. We were
engaged by the Board to render this opinion in connection with
the Boards discharge of its fiduciary obligations.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing and such other matters
as we deem relevant, it is our opinion that, the Merger
Consideration to be paid by the Acquiror in the Transaction is
fair, from a financial point of view, to the Acquiror.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Avondale
Partners, LLC
|
AVONDALE PARTNERS, LLC
E-3
Annex F
Imperial
Capital
2000 Avenue
of the Stars,
9th Floor
South Los Angeles, California 90067 TEL 310 246 3700 800 929
2299 FAX 310
246-3714
December 10, 2008
Board of Directors of Hirsh Electronics Corp.
1900 Carnegie Ave., Building B
Santa Ana, CA
92705-5520
Attention: Board of Directors of Hirsch Electronics Corp.
Dear Sirs:
We understand that SCM Microsystems, Inc.
(Acquiror), Deer Acquisition, Inc., a
California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Acquiror
(Merger Sub), Hirsh Electronics Corp.
(Target) and certain other parties
propose to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger
(Merger Agreement) pursuant to which
Merger Sub will merge with and into Target as a result of which
Target shall continue in existence and become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Acquiror (the Merger),
and following such Merger, Target will merge into Hart
Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror. The transactions
referred to in the prior sentence are referred to herein as the
Transaction. Pursuant to the terms set
forth in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the
Merger, each issued and outstanding share of common stock, no
par value, of Target (other than treasury shares held by Target
or shares owned by Acquiror or any subsidiary of Acquiror or
Target, which shares shall be cancelled and extinguished, and
other than Dissenting Shares, as defined in the Merger
Agreement, as provided in Section 2.9 of the Merger
Agreement) shall be cancelled, extinguished and converted
automatically into the right to receive (a) two shares of
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Acquiror (the
Per Share Stock Consideration),
(b) $3.00 (the Per Share Cash
Consideration), and (c) a warrant to acquire
one share of Acquiror common stock, par value $0.001 per share,
at an exercise price equal to $3.00 per share (the
Per Share Warrant Consideration, and
together with the Per Share Stock Consideration and the Per
Share Cash Consideration, the Per Share
Consideration). For the purposes of rendering this
Opinion (defined below) we have assumed that (a) there will
be no Dissenting Shares in connection with the Transaction,
(b) 4,705,735 shares of the common stock, no par
value, of Target (the Common Stock)
will be outstanding and held by shareholders, of which 633,000
are held by Larry Midland, as of immediately prior to the
effective time of the Merger (the Outstanding
Shares), and (c) the Maximum Number of
Company Shares as defined in the Merger Agreement equals
4,705,735 shares of Common Stock. As used herein, the term
Aggregate Consideration to
Non-Insiders means the aggregate amount obtained
by multiplying the Per Share Consideration by the sum equal to
(x) the number of Outstanding Shares, less (y) the
number of shares of Target Common Stock held by Larry Midland as
of immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger. The
holders of Target Common Stock other than Larry Midland shall be
referred to herein as the Non-Insider
Shareholders.
You have requested our opinion (the
Opinion) as to whether, as of the date
hereof the Aggregate Consideration to Non-Insiders is fair, from
a financial point of view, to the Non-Insider Shareholders.
Other than with respect to the Egis Indication (described
below), we have not been requested to, and did not,
(a) initiate or participate in any discussions or
negotiations with, or solicit any indications of interest from,
third parties with respect to the Transaction, the assets,
businesses or operations of the Target, or any alternatives to
the Transaction, (b) negotiate the terms of the
Transaction, or (c) advise the Board of Directors of
Target, Acquiror, or any other party with respect to
alternatives to the Transaction. Certain principals of Imperial
Capital are members of the general partnership that manages an
investment fund named Egis Capital
(Egis). Egis made a preliminary offer
to purchase Target in April 2008 (the Egis
Indication), which offer was rejected by Target.
Imperial
Capital, LLC
F-1
Hirsch Electronics Corp.
December 10, 2008
Page 2 of 4
You understand that we have based our analysis for the Opinion
on only the following information (the
Information), all of which we have
received and reviewed:
1. Targets audited financial statements for its
fiscal years ended 2005, 2006 and 2007 prepared and approved by
Targets management;
2. Targets unaudited financial statements for its
year-to-date ended September 30, 2007 and
September 30, 2008
prepared and approved by Targets management;
3. Acquirors audited financial statements for its
fiscal years ended 2005, 2006 and 2007, as contained in
Acquirors Annual Reports on Form
10-K (or
Form 10-K/A,
as applicable), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on March 18,
2008;
4. Acquirors unaudited financial statements for its
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007,
September 30, 2007, March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008
and September 30, 2008 as contained in Acquirors
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
filed with the SEC on May 14, 2008, August 12, 2008
and November 10, 2008;
5. Income statement projections for Aquiror for calendar
years 2008 - 2012 prepared and approved by Acquirors
management;
6. Income statement projections for Target for calendar
years 2008 2012 prepared by Targets management;
7. Acquiror balance sheet dated as of September 30,
2008 prepared and approved by Acquirors management;
8. Target balance sheet dated as of October 31, 2008
prepared and approved by Targets management;
9. An unexecuted draft of the Merger Agreement dated
November 18, 2008, by and among Target, Merger Sub and
Acquiror, excluding the schedules and exhibits thereto;
10. Certain other publicly available financial data for
certain companies that we deem comparable or otherwise relevant
to Target or Acquiror and the terms of recent transactions that
we consider comparable or otherwise relevant to the Transaction,
including, without limitation, publicly available prices;
11. The reported price and trading activities for the
shares of common stock of Acquiror; and
In connection with this Opinion, we have conducted such analyses
as we have deemed appropriate, however, the information we have
utilized in conducting such analyses has been limited to solely
the Information described above. With respect to financial
estimates and projections provided to us, we have assumed
without independent verification that they have been reasonably
prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments by management as to the future results
of operations, synergies and financial performance of the Target
and Acquiror to which such estimates and projections relate and
have assumed that such results of operations, synergies and
financial performance will be realized. We have also assumed
that there has been no material change in the assets, financial
condition or business of Target or Acquiror since the date of
the most recent Target and Acquiror financial statements made
available to us. No facts have actually come to our attention
that would cause us to believe that such assumptions are invalid
as a whole. We have further relied upon the assurance of
Targets management that they are unaware of any facts that
would make the information provided to us incomplete or
misleading in any material respect.
We have not independently verified the accuracy and completeness
of the information supplied to us with respect to the Target or
Acquiror, have relied on it being complete and accurate in all
material respects and we are not assuming any responsibility for
independent verification of such information. We have not met
with or had any
Imperial
Capital, LLC
F-2
Hirsch Electronics Corp.
December 10, 2008
Page 3 of 4
discussions with any representatives of Acquiror or Target
(other than members of their respective senior management)
including Acquirors and Targets independent
accounting firms. We have not made any physical inspection or
independent appraisal of any of the properties or assets of
Target or Acquiror, have not made an independent appraisal or
evaluation of Targets or Acquirors assets or
liabilities and have not been provided with such an evaluation
or appraisal. We did not estimate, and express no opinion
regarding, the liquidation value of any entity. With your
consent, we have undertaken no independent analysis of any
potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible
unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to which
Target or Acquiror is or may be a party or is or may be subject,
or of any governmental investigation of any possible unasserted
claims or other contingent liabilities to which Target or
Acquiror is or may be a party or is or may be subject.
The draft Merger Agreement that we were provided did not contain
exhibits or schedules. As such, we have assumed that the
fairness to the Non-Insider Shareholders of the Aggregate
Consideration to Non-Insiders is not impacted by the presence or
omission of the schedules and exhibits to the Merger Agreement.
We have not reviewed any ancillary agreement or any other
document, other than as explicitly listed herein, related to the
Transaction. We have relied upon and assumed, without
independent verification, that (i) the Transaction as
contemplated by the Merger Agreement will be consummated as
described in the form reviewed by us without any material
amendments or modifications thereto, (ii) that all
representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement of the
parties thereto are true and accurate in all respects,
(iii) the Transaction will be consummated in a manner that
complies in all respects with all applicable federal and state
statutes, rules and regulations, and (iv) all governmental,
regulatory, and other consents and approvals necessary for the
consummation of the Transaction will be obtained and that no
delay, limitations, restrictions or conditions will be imposed
or amendments, modifications or waivers made that would result
in the disposition of any material portion of the assets of
Target or Acquiror, or otherwise have an adverse effect on
Target or Acquiror or any expected benefits of the Transaction.
We have not been requested to opine as to, and this Opinion does
not express an opinion as to or otherwise address: (i) the
underlying business decision of Target or any other party to
proceed with or effect the Transaction, (ii) the terms or
impact of any arrangements, understandings, agreements or
documents related to, or the form or structure or any other
portion or aspect of, the Transaction or otherwise (other than
the Aggregate Consideration to Non-Insiders to the extent
expressly specified herein), including, without limitation,
(1) the form or structure of the Aggregate Consideration to
Non-Insiders or any component thereof (2) any voting
agreement (including but not limited to the Voting Agreement
referenced in the Merger Agreement) or shareholders agreement
(including but not limited to the Shareholders Agreement
referenced in the Merger Agreement), (3) any options or
warrants to acquire Target securities, (4) the Secure
Agreements (as defined in the Merger Agreement), and
(5) the Preferred Stock Rights Agreement (as defined in the
Merger Agreement) or any waiver of rights thereunder,
(iii) the impact of any transfer restrictions on the
securities of Acquiror, whether imposed by law or contract,
including, without limitation, those restrictions contained in
the
lock-up
or similar provisions of the Merger Agreement, (iv) the
fairness of any portion or aspect of the Transaction to the
holders of any Target options or warrants, (v) the relative
merits of the Transaction as compared to any alternative
business strategies that might exist for Target or the effect of
any other transaction in which Target might engage,
(vi) the fairness of any portion or aspect of the
Transaction to any one class or group of Targets security
holders vis-à-vis any other class or group of Targets
security holders (including, without limitation, the allocation
of any consideration amongst or within such classes or groups of
security holders), (vii) the solvency, creditworthiness or
fair value of Target or Acquiror or any other participant in the
Transaction under any applicable laws relating to bankruptcy,
insolvency, fraudulent conveyance or similar matters,
(viii) any legal, tax or accounting issues concerning the
Transaction or the legal or tax consequences of the Transaction
to Target or its security holders or any other party, or
(ix) the amount or nature of any compensation to any
officers, directors or employees of Target, or any class of such
persons, relative to the consideration to be received by the
other holders of Targets Common Stock in the Transaction
or with respect to the fairness of any such compensation.
Furthermore, no opinion, counsel or interpretation is intended
or given in matters that require legal, regulatory, accounting,
insurance, tax or other similar professional advice. It is
assumed that such opinions, counsel or
Imperial
Capital, LLC
F-3
Hirsch Electronics Corp.
December 10, 2008
Page 4 of 4
interpretations have been or will be obtained from appropriate
professional sources. In addition, and without in any way
modifying or limiting any other assumptions or limitations
contained herein, our Opinion does not address or take into
account (i) any of Targets royalty agreements or
related party transactions, including but not limited to those
involving Secure Keyboards, Ltd. and Secure Networks, Ltd., or
(ii) whether Target could carry a higher valuation if such
agreements and transactions were eliminated or restructured.
Our Opinion is necessarily based on business, economic, market
and other conditions as they exist and can be evaluated by us as
of the date of this letter. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this Opinion and that we do
not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm this
Opinion or otherwise comment on or consider events occurring
after the date hereof. We are not expressing an opinion herein
with respect to the prices at which Acquirors common stock
may trade subsequent to disclosure or consummation of the
Transaction. We have conducted only such reviews, analyses and
inquiries as expressly indicated herein.
We have not acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors
of Target or Acquiror or to any other party to the Transaction.
We will not receive any consideration or other compensation that
is contingent upon the successful completion of the Transaction.
We will receive a fee for providing this Opinion, which shall be
paid by Target. Such fee is not contingent upon consummation of
the Transaction. Target has also agreed to reimburse our
expenses incurred in rendering this Opinion and to indemnify us
against certain liabilities arising out of our engagement in
connection therewith. We do not actively trade the debt or
equity securities of the Acquiror or Target for our own accounts
or for the accounts of customers. There is no material
relationship that existed during the past two years or is
mutually understood to be contemplated in which any compensation
was received or is intended to be received by us as a result of
the relationship between us, Acquiror, Target, or any other
party to the Transaction. However, we are regularly engaged in a
broad range of investment banking and financial advisory
activities, including activities relating to corporate finance,
mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts and private
placements, and thus we may provide investment banking,
financial advisory and other financial services to the Acquiror,
Target, and other participants in the Transaction
and/or
certain of their respective affiliates in the future, for which
we may receive compensation. This Opinion was approved by our
Fairness Opinion Committee.
This Opinion should not be construed as creating any fiduciary
duty on our part to any party. This Opinion is not intended to
be, and does not constitute, a recommendation to the Board of
Directors of Target, any security holder or any other person as
to how to act or vote with respect to any matter relating to the
Transaction. This letter, including the contents hereof, is
solely intended for the benefit and use of Targets Board
of Directors and as such is not to be used for any other purpose
or reproduced, disseminated, summarized, quoted from or referred
to at any time, in whole or in part, without our prior written
consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, provided,
however, that this Opinion may be included in whole, but not in
part, in a filing with the SEC in connection with the
Transaction.
Based upon the foregoing, including the various assumptions and
limitations set forth herein, and in reliance thereon, it is our
opinion that, as of the date hereof the Aggregate Consideration
to Non-Insiders is fair, from a financial point of view, to the
Non-Insider Shareholders .
IMPERIAL CAPITAL, LLC
Imperial
Capital, LLC
F-4
Annex G
FIRST
AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT
This FIRST AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT, dated as of
December 10, 2008 (this Amendment), is
entered into by and between SCM Microsystems, Inc. a Delaware
corporation (the Company), and American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company (the Rights
Agent).
WHEREAS, the Company and the Rights Agent entered into a Rights
Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2002 (the
Rights Agreement);
WHEREAS, Section 27 of the Rights Agreement provides that,
in certain circumstances, the Company may supplement or amend
the Rights Agreement in any respect, without the approval of any
holders of Rights, and the Rights Agent shall execute such
supplement or amendment;
WHEREAS, the Company has entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the Merger Agreement) by and among
the Company, Hirsch Electronics Corporation, a California
corporation (Hirsch), Deer Acquisition, Inc.,
a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company, and Hart Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, pursuant
to which through a two-step merger Hirsch will become a new
Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Company (the Merger) and the Company
will issue shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase
shares of its common stock to the former stockholders of Hirsch
as merger consideration;
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2008, the Board of Directors of the
Company approved the Merger Agreement and the Merger and
determined that the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement are advisable and fair to,
and in the best interests of, the Company and its stockholders;
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2008, the Board of Directors of the
Company resolved to amend the Rights Agreement to ensure that
none of the execution or delivery of the Merger Agreement and
consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, or the
execution or delivery of the ancillary agreements contemplated
by the Merger Agreement or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated thereby, will cause (a) the Rights to become
exercisable under the Rights Agreement, (b) Hirsch or any
of their affiliates or stockholders to be deemed to be an
Acquiring Person, or (c) a Triggering
Event, the Distribution Date or the
Shares Acquisition Date to occur; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to modify the terms of the Rights
Agreement in certain respects as set forth herein, and in
connection therewith, is entering into this Amendment and
directing the Rights Agent to enter into this Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
agreements herein set forth, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Effect of Amendment. Except as
expressly provided herein, the Rights Agreement shall be and
remain in full force and effect.
2. Capitalized Terms. All
capitalized, undefined terms used in this Amendment shall have
the meanings assigned thereto in the Rights Agreement.
3. Amendments to Section 1.
(a) The definition of Acquiring Person in
Section 1 of the Rights Agreement is hereby amended to read
in its entirety as follows:
Acquiring Person shall mean any
Person, who or which, together with all Affiliates and
Associates of such Person, shall be the Beneficial Owner of 15%
or more of the Common Shares then outstanding, but shall not
include the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or any
employee benefit plan of the Company or of any Subsidiary of the
Company, or any entity holding Common Shares for or pursuant to
the terms of any such plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no
Person shall be deemed to be an Acquiring Person as the result
of an acquisition of Common Shares by the Company which, by
reducing the number of shares outstanding, increases the
G-1
|
|
|
|
|
proportionate number of shares beneficially owned by such Person
to 15% or more of the Common Shares of the Company then
outstanding; provided, however, that if a Person shall become
the Beneficial Owner of 15% or more of the Common Shares of the
Company then outstanding by reason of share purchases by the
Company and shall, after such share purchases by the Company,
become the Beneficial Owner of any additional Common Shares of
the Company (other than pursuant to a dividend or distribution
paid or made by the Company on the outstanding Common Shares in
Common Shares or pursuant to a split or subdivision of the
outstanding Common Shares), then such Person shall be deemed to
be an Acquiring Person unless upon becoming the Beneficial Owner
of such additional Common Shares of the Company such Person does
not beneficially own 15% or more of the Common Shares of the
Company then outstanding. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
(i) if the Companys Board of Directors determines in
good faith that a Person who would otherwise be an
Acquiring Person, as defined pursuant to the
foregoing provisions of this paragraph (a), has become such
inadvertently (including, without limitation, because
(A) such Person was unaware that it beneficially owned a
percentage of the Common Shares that would otherwise cause such
Person to be an Acquiring Person, as defined
pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this paragraph (a), or
(B) such Person was aware of the extent of the Common
Shares it beneficially owned but had no actual knowledge of the
consequences of such beneficial ownership under this Agreement)
and without any intention of changing or influencing control of
the Company, and if such Person divested or divests as promptly
as practicable a sufficient number of Common Shares so that such
Person would no longer be an Acquiring Person, as
defined pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this paragraph
(a), then such Person shall not be deemed to be or to have
become an Acquiring Person for any purposes of this
Agreement including, without limitation Section 1(gg)
hereof; (ii) if, as of the date hereof, any Person is the
Beneficial Owner of 15% or more of the Common Shares
outstanding, such Person shall not be or become an
Acquiring Person, as defined pursuant to the
foregoing provisions of this paragraph (a), unless and until
such time as such Person shall become the Beneficial Owner of
additional Common Shares (other than pursuant to a dividend or
distribution paid or made by the Company on the outstanding
Common Shares in Common Shares or pursuant to a split or
subdivision of the outstanding Common Shares), unless, upon
becoming the Beneficial Owner of such additional Common Shares,
such Person is not then the Beneficial Owner of 15% or more of
the Common Shares then outstanding; and (iii) neither
Hirsch nor any of its affiliates or stockholders shall be deemed
an Acquiring Person on account of the execution or delivery of
the Merger Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements or the
consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby
(including, until the termination of the Stockholder Agreement
in accordance with its terms, as a result of any Hirsch
stockholder being deemed the Beneficial Owner of any Common
Shares solely as a result of their being a party to the
Stockholder Agreement).
|
(b) The definition of Distribution Date in
Section 1 of the Rights Agreement is hereby amended to read
in its entirety as follows:
Distribution Date shall mean the
earlier of (i) the Close of Business on the tenth (10th)
Business day (or such later date as may be determined by action
of the Companys Board of Directors) after the
Shares Acquisition Date (or, if the tenth (10th) Business
Day after the Shares Acquisition Date occurs before the
Record Date, the Close of Business on the Record Date) or
(ii) the Close of Business on the tenth (10th) Business Day
(or such later date as may be determined by action of the
Companys Board of Directors) after the date that a tender
or exchange offer by any Person (other than the Company, any
Subsidiary of the Company, any Person pursuant to the Merger
Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements, any employee benefit plan
of the Company or of any Subsidiary of the Company, or any
Person or entity organized, appointed or established by the
Company for or pursuant to the terms of any such plan) is first
published or sent or given within the meaning of
Rule 14d-2(a)
of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act, if,
assuming the successful consummation thereof, such Person would
be an Acquiring Person; provided that, if such Person is
determined not to have become an Acquiring Person pursuant to
Section 1(a) hereof, then no Distribution Date shall be
deemed to have occurred by virtue of such event.
(c) The definition of Shares Acquisition
Date in Section 1 of the Rights Agreement is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows:
Shares Acquisition Date shall mean
the first date of public announcement (which, for purposes of
this definition, shall include, without limitation, a report
filed pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, but
exclude any public announcement or report relating to the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or
G-2
the Ancillary Agreements) by the Company or an Acquiring Person
that an Acquiring Person has become such; provided that, if such
Person is determined not to have become an Acquiring Person
pursuant to Section 1(a) hereof, then no
Shares Acquisition Date shall be deemed to have occurred by
virtue of such event.
(d) The definition of Triggering Event in
Section 1 of the Rights Agreement is hereby amended to read
in its entirety as follows:
A Triggering Event shall be deemed to have
occurred upon any Person becoming an Acquiring Person; provided
that, if such Person is determined not to have become an
Acquiring Person pursuant to Section 1(a) hereof, then no
Triggering Event shall be deemed to have occurred by virtue of
such event.
(e) The definitions contained in Section 1 of the
Rights Agreement shall be supplemented by adding the following
definitions in alphabetical order:
Ancillary Agreements shall mean
all agreements, documents and instruments required to be
delivered by any party pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and any
other agreements, documents or instruments entered into at or
prior to effective time of the Merger in connection with the
Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby.
Deer Merger Sub shall mean Deer
Acquisition, Inc., a California corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company.
Hart Merger Sub shall mean Hart
Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
Hirsch shall mean Hirsch, a California
corporation.
Merger Agreement shall mean the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among the Company, Hirsch,
Deer Merger Sub and Hart Merger Sub, pursuant to which through a
two-step merger Hirsch will become a new Delaware limited
liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
(the Merger).
Stockholder Agreement shall mean the
Stockholder Agreement, by and among the Company and the Hirsch
stockholders a party thereto.
4. New
Section 35. Section 35 is hereby
added to the Rights Agreement to read in its entirety as follows:
Section 35. The Merger Agreement. Notwithstanding
anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, neither
the approval, execution or delivery of the Merger Agreement or
the Ancillary Agreements, nor the consummation of the
transactions contemplated thereby or the performance by the
Company of its obligations thereunder shall cause (a) the
Rights to become exercisable, (b) Hirsch or any of its
affiliates or stockholder to be an Acquiring Person, (c) a
Triggering Event to occur, (d) a Shares Acquisition
Date to occur or (e) a Distribution Date to occur.
5. Effective Date. This Amendment
is effective as of December 10, 2008, immediately prior to
the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement.
6. Governing Law. This Amendment
shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with
the laws of the State of Delaware without reference to the
conflicts or choice of law principles thereof.
7. Counterparts; Facsimile
Signatures. This Amendment may be executed in
any number of counterparts (including facsimile signature) each
of which shall be an original with the same effect as if the
signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.
8. Headings. The headings in this
Amendment are included for convenience of reference only and
shall be ignored in the construction or interpretation hereof.
[Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left
Blank]
G-3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Amendment to be duly executed, all as of the day and year first
above written.
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
Felix Marx
Chief Executive Officer
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST
COMPANY
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Herbert
J. Lemmer
|
Name: Herbert J. Lemmer
[Signature
Page to Amendment to Rights Agreement]
G-4
Annex H
SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
This Agreement made as of this 14th day of November 1994,
between HIRSCH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a California corporation
(hereinafter referred to as HEC). SECURE KEYBOARDS,
LTD., a California limited partnership (hereinafter referred to
as Keyboards), and SECURE NETWORKS, LTD., a
California limited partnership (hereinafter referred to as
Networks), is entered into with reference to the
following facts:
ARTICLE A. HEC was founded in 1981 by
Steve Hirsch, a young entrepreneur who had invented a security
technology, and Lawrence Midland, Howard Miller, Robert Parsons
and Luis Villalobos, who provided the initial financing.
1. By late 1981, Steve Hirsch had begun preparation of a
patent application, and was seeking financing for HEC, which he
had incorporated to exploit his invention. After an unrelated
private placement had failed to close, Villalobos and Miller
structured a financing (seed capital for HEC and an R&D
partnership to fund development of the technology) and rewrote
the patent application.
2. Keyboards, the R&D partnership, bought all the
rights to the technology from Steve Hirsch, and then granted an
exclusive license to HEC, and an option to purchase the
technology under certain conditions. Technology was
defined1
to include not just the original invention, but all associated
and future developments and products. Thus, HEC was the vehicle
for exploiting the Technology, and Keyboards, having provided
the funds to develop the Technology, was to receive payments
through the year 2020 based on revenues from the broadly defined
Technology. Keyboards general partners deferred most of their
upside potential until after the limited partners received 125%
of their pre-tax investment, which for someone in the 50%
bracket would be 2-1/2 times their after-tax investment;
thereafter limited partners receive approximately 20% of the
royalties.
3. Midland, Miller, Villalobos and GRFN (a California
corporation formed for that purpose) were the original general
partners in Keyboards. Soon after Keyboards formation, Parsons
became a general partner; GRFN was subsequently discontinued.
4. Midland, Miller, Parsons and Villalobos provided seed
capital to HEC and provided guarantees with respect to obtaining
the R&D financing. Midland and Parsons subsequently raised
$400,000 of capital from limited partners in Keyboards.
ARTICLE B. HEC met all of the conditions,
and exercised its option and purchased the Technology from
Keyboards. The terms of purchase called for
payments2
to Keyboards through the year 2020.
ARTICLE C. In 1985 and 1986 additional
capital was raised to finance the development and
marketing of various new security systems product lines which
will help drive the sales of the Digital
Scrambler.3
1. Parsons raised $550,000 in equity by selling shares of
HEC stock to private investors.
2. Midland and Parsons as general partners formed Networks,
and raised $1,200,000 from limited partners, approximately half
in 1985 and the balance in 1986.
3. Two agreements were entered into between HEC and
Networks: a written agreement, relating to the 1985 portion of
funding, which called for royalties through the year 2005; and
an oral agreement relating to the 1986 portion of funding.
1 The
1986 agreement between HEC and Keyboards, recapping the original
agreement, included the following: the
Technology means the patent and patent applications
and all associated knowhow, software, trademarks and tradenames
and all future developments, patent applications, patents,
knowhow, software, trademarks and tradenames.
2 These
payments for the purchase are generally referred to herein as
royalties for simplicity; but their actual nature
was installment payments for the sale of the technology.
3 From
the 1986 agreement between HEC and Keyboards.
H-1
ARTICLE D. HEC wished to avoid paying
royalties on the same revenue to both Keyboards and Networks. To
that end, in 1986 HEC and Keyboards executed an agreement, which
excluded from Keyboards royalty base, those products
developed on funding from Networks.
ARTICLE E. A dispute has arisen among
Keyboards, HEC and Networks as to the royalties that have been
paid and are to be paid. The parties contentions are generally
as follows:
1. Keyboards contends: (a) that even though all
current and past HEC revenues fall within the definition of
Technology, HEC had incorrectly excluded various
revenues from Keyboards royalties; (b) that HEC had not
been paying royalties on software at the correct and higher
rate;4
(c) that the sole exception to Keyboards royalties had
effectively expired since HEC no longer sold products
developed on funding from Networks; (d) that while
HECs agreements with Networks may in effect require HEC to
pay royalties to both Keyboards and Networks, they cannot
relieve HEC of its royalty obligations to Keyboards.
2. Networks contends: (a) that its agreements with HEC
were intended to provide royalties not just on the products that
were directly developed from that funding, but also on products
that evolved from them; (b) that otherwise the limited
partners could not recoup, much less obtain a return on, their
investment; (c) that its 1986 oral agreement with HEC had
extended royalty payments to the year 2011; and (d) that
while HECs agreements with Keyboards may in effect require
HEC to pay royalties to both Keyboards and Networks, they cannot
relieve HEC of its royalty obligations to Networks.
3. HEC contends: (a) that HEC never intended to pay
royalties to both Keyboards and Networks on the same products;
(b) that paying 14% to 28% royalty to Keyboards on software
would seriously impair HECs margins on software sales;
(c) that HEC had interpreted its obligations to Keyboards
and Networks not just based on the language in the agreements,
but also based on what it understood to be the intent of those
agreements, as well as what it believed to be equitable to the
parties; (d) that HEC had been computing the revenues for
Networks royalties based on a remoteness dilution
basis;5
(e) that HEC may have understated its royalty obligations
to Keyboards, but if so, any error was in good faith;
(f) that HEC is forced into making difficult and sometimes
arbitrary decisions as to what portion of revenues are subject
to royalties to which of the partnerships, and (g) that the
royalty agreements
hamper6
HECs ability to price and configure products.
ARTICLE F. Each of the parties agrees:
1. That litigation to resolve these issues would be
expensive, time consuming, distracting, and harmful to the
business goals of the parties.
2. That there was reasonable risk that if contested, some
or all of the contentions in its interest could have been
rejected and that, some or all of the contentions against its
interest could have been upheld.
3. That including all HEC revenues in the base for
royalties, and apportioning that base between Keyboards and
Networks on fixed percentages, eliminates the underlying factors
that led to, and is a reasonable compromise for, their present
dispute.
4. That rather than incur the risks of litigation, it is
preferable to settle the dispute as set forth herein.
WITH REGARD TO THE FOREGOING, therefore, in good faith and in
the exercise of their reasonable business judgment, the parties
enter into the following settlement and agreement as of the date
first set forth above.
4 The
Purchase and Sala of Technology agreement between HEC and
Keyboards, calls for royalties of 14% to 28% for license and
sub-license
revenues, and 4.25% on all other revenues.
5 Which
meant that as a product evolved and became more remote from a
product directly developed on funding from Networks,
HEC diluted its share of revenues in computing Networks
royalties; and that whenever a subsequent product (such as SAM)
departed sufficiently from a product developed on funding
from Networks, then HEC no longer deemed it subject to
royalties to Networks.
6 For
example, if HEC incorporates a keypad into a product
developed on funding from Networks, then HEC would
have to pay royalties to both Keyboards and Networks; or if HEC
throws-in software to close a major sale, there is no clear way
to decide how much of the revenue to impute to the software.
H-2
ARTICLE G. For a transition period,
between the execution of this Agreement and the end of
HECs current fiscal year, November 30, 1994, the
parties agree to the following:
1. HEC, in good faith, shall continue its past practices
with respect to purchase price payments to Keyboards and royalty
payments to Networks; (hereinafter purchase price payments to
Keyboards and royalty payments to Networks shall individually
and collectively be referred to as royalty or
royalties).
2. All royalties earned or paid, from the inception of the
HEC agreements with Keyboards and Networks, through
November 30, 1994, shall be deemed to be correct. No
changes shall be made; not for adjustments in HEC revenues, nor
if errors are discovered, nor for any other reason.
3. Any future auditor of HEC can accept this Agreement as
express ratification that the royalties HEC has recognized and
paid on its revenues through November 30, 1994 are correct
as stated.
ARTICLE H. For the entire period
beginning with December 1, 1994 and ending with
December 31, 2020, the parties agree to the following:
1. Other than from a possible exclusion pursuant to
Paragraph 6 of this Article H, without exception HEC
shall pay royalties on all of its revenues. The provisions of
Article I Paragraph 2 govern the treatment of HEC
revenues that are themselves royalties or equivalent.
2. HEC shall pay Keyboards royalties based on an increasing
percentage of HEC revenues, starting at 55.56% for revenues
received in the year beginning on December 1, 1994,
increasing by 2.08% each year through the year beginning on
December 1, 2010, and continuing at that rate for the month
of December of 2011, then increasing to 100% from
January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2020; the final
payment thus being due on January 30, 2021, for HEC
revenues received in the fourth calendar quarter of the year
2020. (The percentage split of HEC revenues between Keyboards
and Networks, which is set forth in this and the following
paragraph, is more fully detailed in the table below).
3. HEC shall pay Networks royalties based on a decreasing
percentage of HEC revenues, starting at 44.44% for revenues
received in the year beginning on December 1, 1994,
decreasing by 2.08% each year through the year beginning
December 1, 2010, and continuing at that rate for the month
of December of 2011; no royalties shall be payable to Networks
for revenue received by HEC after December 31, 2011; the
final payment thus being due on January 30, 2012 for HEC
revenues received in the fourth calendar quarter of the year
2011. (The percentage split of
H-3
HEC revenues between Keyboards and Networks, which is set forth
in this and the preceding paragraph, is more fully detailed in
the table below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEC Revenue Receipts Split
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Keyboards
|
|
|
Networks
|
|
Revenue Receipts Period
|
|
Receipts
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
December 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
1995
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
55.56
|
%
|
|
|
44.44
|
%
|
1995
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
57.64
|
%
|
|
|
42.36
|
%
|
1996
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
59.72
|
%
|
|
|
40.28
|
%
|
1997
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
61.80
|
%
|
|
|
38.20
|
%
|
1998
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
63.88
|
%
|
|
|
36.12
|
%
|
1999
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
65.96
|
%
|
|
|
34.04
|
%
|
2000
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
68.04
|
%
|
|
|
31.96
|
%
|
2001
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
70.12
|
%
|
|
|
29.88
|
%
|
2002
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
72.20
|
%
|
|
|
27.80
|
%
|
2003
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
74.28
|
%
|
|
|
25.72
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
76.36
|
%
|
|
|
23.64
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
78.44
|
%
|
|
|
21.56
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
80.52
|
%
|
|
|
19.48
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
82.60
|
%
|
|
|
17.40
|
%
|
2008
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
84.68
|
%
|
|
|
15.32
|
%
|
2009
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
86.76
|
%
|
|
|
13.24
|
%
|
2010
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
100,00
|
%
|
|
|
88.84
|
%
|
|
|
11.16
|
%
|
December 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
88.84
|
%
|
|
|
11.16
|
%
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
4. All royalties to Keyboards shall be at the single rate
of 4.25% (four and one quarter percent) of Keyboards percentage
of HEC revenues. This paragraph expressly supersedes the
provision that had excluded from royalty-bearing revenues the
cost of OEM products bought by HEC for resale. The provisions of
Article I Paragraph 2 govern the treatment of HEC
revenues that are themselves royalties or equivalent.
5. All royalties to Networks shall be at the single rate of
5.5% (five and one-half percent) of Networks percentage of HEC
revenues. The provisions of Article I Paragraph 2
govern the treatment of HEC revenues that are themselves
royalties or equivalent.
6. Should HEC want to exclude the revenues from a
completely
different7
line of business (New Business), eg. manufacturing
automobiles, from NECs royalty obligations to Keyboards
and Networks, HEC shall, prior to committing to the New
Business, provide 21 (twenty-one) days written notice to
Keyboards and all four of Keyboards general partners. Said
notice, which shall be pursuant to the provisions of
Article I Paragraph 13, shall include a copy of a
formal consent from HECs board of directors authorizing
pursuit of the New Business, and shall describe the New Business
that HEC wishes to pursue and the corporate reasons for doing
so. The information contained in said notice shall be treated as
confidential information by the recipients, and shall be subject
to non-disclosure; unless independently obtained by lawful
means. Failure to provide the required notice 21 days in
advance of committing to the New Business, shall be deemed
conclusive assent by HEC to pay royalties on any past, and all
future, revenues from the New Business. Approval from Networks
shall not be required.
7 A
completely different line of business from HECs present or
then current line of business.
H-4
ARTICLE I. The parties agree to the
following additional provisions:
1. Within 30 (thirty) days after the end of each calendar
quarter, HEC shall deliver to Keyboards and to Networks
(a) the royalties due, and (b) a statement, signed by
HEC, setting forth both HECs total revenues and total
revenue receipts for each month in the preceding quarter. The
parties agree that failure by Keyboards
and/or
Networks to require any one or more statements shall not be
deemed a waiver of HECs obligations. Within 30 (thirty)
days after a written request by Keyboards, or any of one of its
general partners (or for each general partner who is not alive,
by his heirs or assigns), HEC shall hire a nationally prominent
firm of certified public accountants to perform immediately an
audit on HECs revenues and royalty payments, through the
close of HECs most recent fiscal quarter; this provision
shall not apply if a nationally prominent firm of certified
public accountants is already in the process of performing, or
annually conducts, a full audit of HEC.
2. If HEC intends to license (or equivalent) any of its
assets, revenue base or Technology for royalties (or
equivalent), then HEC shall provide 30 (thirty) days written
notice to Keyboards and all four general partners. Said notice,
which shall be pursuant to the provisions of Article I
Paragraph 13, shall include a copy of the proposed
licensing agreement, and shall describe the assets, Technology
or revenue base that HEC wishes to license and the corporate
reasons for doing so. Keyboards general partners (or for each
general partner who is not alive, his heirs or assigns) shall be
allowed at least 10 (ten) business days to review and comment on
the proposed agreement, prior to its execution. Failure to
provide the required notice and the opportunity to review and
comment in advance of committing to a licensing agreement, shall
be deemed conclusive assent by HEC to the provisions of
Sub-paragraph
(b) below. Approval from Networks shall not be required.
For HEC revenues from licenses (or equivalent), in lieu of the
royalty rates of Article H Paragraphs 4 and 5,
HECs royalty obligations to Keyboards and Networks shall
be as follows:
(a) If the license (or equivalent) is an arms-length
transaction and does not involve an affiliated or
related8
party, then the total royalties HEC
receives9
(Receipts) shall be allocated in accordance with the
percentages defined in Article H Paragraphs 2 and 3
and in the accompanying table. HEC shall pay to Keyboards 28%
(twenty-eight percent) of Keyboards allocated share of Receipts,
until such time as Keyboards has received a total of $504,000
(five hundred and four thousand) from such payments, thereafter
HEC shall pay to Keyboards 14% (fourteen percent) of Keyboards
allocated share of Receipts. HEC shall pay to Networks 28%
(twenty-eight percent) of Networks allocated share of Receipts,
until such time as Networks has received a total of $1,512,000
(one million five hundred and twelve thousand) from such
payments, thereafter HEC shall pay to Networks 14% (fourteen
percent) of Networks allocated share of Receipts. Nothing in the
provisions of this paragraph shall be deemed to permit a license
(or equivalent) to become a substitute for a Transfer, as
defined in Article I Paragraph 6.
(b) For any other license (or equivalent) or if the
licensee (or equivalent) is a related or affiliated party then
HECs obligations shall be deemed to be a direct pass-thru
of said royalties (or equivalent), at the appropriate rates. For
example, if HEC licenses Technology for a 6% royalty, HEC shall
pass-thru 4.25% (retaining 1.75%) on Keyboards share of the
percentage split of HEC revenues, and pass-thru 5.5% (retaining
0.5%) on Networks share. Except with the express written consent
of Keyboards and all four of Keyboards general partners (or for
each general partner who is not alive, by his heirs or assigns),
HEC shall not license (or equivalent) any of its assets, revenue
base or Technology for a royalty (or equivalent) of less than
4.25% to
5.5%.10
3. HEC and its officers and directors, Keyboards and its
general partners, and Networks and its general partners, each
agree to hold each other harmless, with respect to any claim
that arises because of entering into this Agreement and is made
by any of them against any other of them.
8 A
license (or equivalent) shaft be deemed related to
HEC (or the licensor) if there is any direct or indirect
interest between them.
9 The
parties acknowledge that no license or
sub-license
royalties have been received as of the date of this Agreement.
10 The
actual minimum royalty percent shall be equal to 4.25% times the
Keyboards share of the percentage split of HEC revenues, plus
5.5% times the Networks share; as per the table herein.
H-5
4. In the event of any conflict between the statements and
provisions of this Agreement and any earlier agreement among or
between HEC, Keyboards and Networks, this Agreement shall
control.
5. In addition to the signature of the President of HEC on
this Agreement, the Board of Directors of HEC by formal
resolution shall authorize and direct its President to execute
this Agreement, and a copy of that resolution, signed by the
Secretary of HEC shall be attached to this Agreement.
6. Prior to transferring any portion of HECs assets,
revenue base or Technology, whether by license, sale of assets,
acquisition, merger, or any other means (which in whatever form
shall be designated Transfer herein) to any entity
(Transferee), HEC shall provide at least 21
(twenty-one) days written notice to Keyboards and all four of
Keyboards general partners. Said notice, which shall be pursuant
to the provisions of Article I Paragraph 13, shall
include a copy of a formal consent from HECs board of
directors authorizing said Transfer, and shall describe the
intended Transfer and the corporate reasons for it, and shall
describe the anticipated effects on royalties to Keyboards and
Networks. The information contained in said notice shall be
treated as confidential information by the recipients, and shall
be subject to non-disclosure; unless independently obtained by
lawful means. Failure to provide the required notice
21 days in advance of a Transfer, shall be deemed
conclusive assent by HEC to pay royalties to Keyboards and
Networks on any past, and all future, Transferee revenues from
the HEC assets, revenue base or Technology. Approval from
Networks shall not be required.
7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to
the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and
assigns, whatever form such succession or assignment takes,
including by contract, stock transfer, merger, acquisition, or
transfer of assets.
8. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement among
the parties pertaining to the subject matter contained in it and
supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements,
representations and understandings of the parties.
9. No supplement, waiver, modification, amendment or change
of or to this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in
writing by all parties and by all four of Keyboards general
partners, or for each general partner who is not alive, by his
heirs or assigns.
10. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the
State of California applicable to transactions in the State of
California, between California residents.
11. In the event any action is brought to enforce the
rights of any of the parties hereunder, the losing party agrees
to pay all costs of such action and such reasonable
attorneys fees as may be awarded by the court
12. Nothing in this Agreement whether express or implied,
is intended to confer any rights or remedies under or by reason
of this Agreement on any persons other than the parties to the
Agreement, their general partners as set forth herein, and their
respective successors and assigns, nor is anything in this
Agreement intended to relieve or discharge the obligation or
liability of any third person to any party to this Agreement,
nor shall any provision give any third person any right of
subrogation or action over or against any party to this
Agreement.
13. Any and all notices or other communications required or
desired to be given shall be deemed given or made, if in writing
and personally delivered, or 5 (five) days after mailing, if
sent United States registered mail, return receipt requested,
addressed to the parties and to the copied individuals, or their
respective heirs, successors and assigns, as shown below. Any
party or copied individual, and their heirs, successors and
assigns may hereafter
H-6
designate such other addressee
and/or
address for notice purposes by giving notice thereof. Notice
shall be deemed effective only when all parties and copied
individuals have been properly noticed.
|
|
|
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
|
|
copy:
|
President
2941 Alton Parkway
Irvine, CA 92714
|
|
Secretary of the Corporation
2941 Alton Parkway
Irvine, CA 92714
|
|
|
|
Secure Keyboards, Ltd.
|
|
|
c/o Robert
J. Parsons
567 San Nicolas Drive
Suite 106
Newport Beach, CA 92660
|
|
copy:
Lawrence W. Midlande
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
|
|
|
|
copy:
Howard Miller
13555 Bayliss Road
Los Angeles, CA 90049
|
|
copy:
Luis Villalobos
2 Glenn
Irvine, CA 92720
|
|
|
|
Secure Networks, Ltd.
|
|
|
c/o Robert
J. Parsons
567 San Nicolas Drive
Suite 106
Newport Beach, CA 92660
|
|
copy:
Lawrence W. Midland
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
|
14. The failure of any party to seek redress for violation
or to insist on strict performance of any covenant or condition
of this Agreement shall not prevent a subsequent act which would
have constituted a violation from having the effect of an
original violation.
15. In the event of any dispute relating to the rights of
any of the parties hereunder, any of the disputing parties shall
have the right to invoke Mediation of the dispute by giving
notice to the other disputing parties, pursuant to the notice
provisions of Article I paragraph 13. Mediation shall
commence within 30 (thirty) days after notice. The Mediator
shall be chosen, jointly by the disputing parties; or if they
cannot agree, then chosen by the American Arbitration
Association.
16. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in
this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid,
illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other
provision hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed as if
such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provisions had never been
contained herein.
17. Executed by the following on the dates indicated as of
the date first set forth above.
|
|
|
SECURE KEYBOARDS, LTD.
A California limited partnership
|
|
HIRSCH ELECTRONICS
CORPORATION
|
/s/ Robert
J. Parsons
Robert
J. Parsons,
Managing and General Partner
|
|
/s/ Lawrence
W. Midland
Lawrence
W. Midland,
President and CEO
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lawrence
W. Midland
Lawrence
W. Midland,
General Partner
|
|
SECURE NETWORKS, LTD.
A California limited partnership
|
|
|
|
/s/ Howard
Miller
Howard
Miller,
General Partner
|
|
/s/ Robert
J. Parsons
Robert
J. Parsons,
Managing and General Partner
|
|
|
|
/s/ Luis
Villalobos
Luis
Villalobos,
General Partner
|
|
/s/ Lawrence
W. Midland
Lawrence
W. Midland,
General Partner
|
H-7
Annex I
Amended
and Restated Letter of Understanding
|
|
|
To:
|
|
Felix Marx, CEO SCM Microsystems Inc.
|
From:
|
|
Robert J. Parsons, an individual, as a General Partner of Secure
Networks Lawrence W. Midland, an individual, as a General
Partner of Secure Networks
|
Date:
|
|
January 30, 2009
|
Dear Felix:
We are quite excited by the proposal you have presented to merge
with Hirsch Electronics. We appreciate the fact that in the
context of this merger, you are sensitive to the issues of the
ongoing royalty stream as it affects Secure Networks. We
understand that the current intent is that Hirsch will be a
wholly owned subsidiary of SCM. We also understand that Hirsch
intends to continue to honor the existing Settlement Agreement
until and unless it is modified by the mutual consent of all
parties.
We believe, after reviewing the proposed transaction in detail,
that it will strengthen Hirsch, thereby helping secure and
preserve Networks ongoing royalty stream, and further that it
may well be accretive to Hirschs revenues and hence to
Networks revenue base and royalty stream based upon the
potential synergies going forward.
We understand that in the interests of proceeding with this
merger, SCM desires to clarify a proposed structure of the
business relationship between SCM and Hirsch as it affects or
relates to the Secure Networks royalties. The intent of this
Letter of Understanding is to anticipate and address issues that
could potentially arise as points of contention in a manner that
is fair and equitable to both SCM and Secure Networks, and to
express our understanding, support and acceptance of such
resolutions in a manner that allows the merger to proceed toward
consummation.
In our capacity as the two General Partners of Secure Networks,
we have an ongoing fiduciary responsibility to protect Networks
interests. Because we believe that the proposed merger benefits
Networks, and because we believe the clarifications and
characterizations detailed further below are both fair and
reasonable to Networks, we are willing to agree to and grant
such acknowledgement and acceptance.
Subject to the merger being consummated, Robert Parsons, an
individual and General Partner of Secure Networks, and Lawrence
Midland, an individual and General Partner of Secure Networks,
hereby acknowledge and accept the following characterizations
and clarifications of the business relationship between SCM and
Hirsch and their resulting effects on the companies respective
revenue streams and on Networks revenue base:
1. Sales of all such existing products through existing
Hirsch distribution are and will remain Hirsch revenues and part
of the Networks revenue base. If SCM technology replaces the
current Hirsch Physical access reader offerings on products
which continue to be sold through existing Hirsch distribution,
then such products will be included in Hirschs revenues
and in the revenue base for Networks.
2. Hirsch will continue in part to independently develop
its own products. Such products, sold through Hirsch existing
distribution channels, will continue to be construed as Hirsch
revenue and be included in the Networks revenue base.
3. The opportunity may exist for SCM to compete with in
Hirschs general marketplace, and for SCM to sell its
products which are similar to existing products of to
Hirschs competitors or others. As Hirsch currently has no
interest in and receives no benefit from sales to competitors or
others, such equivalent SCM sales are expressly not included in
Hirsch revenue or the revenue base for Networks.
4. SCM may have or may create opportunities to sell Hirsch
products through SCMs distribution outside of and
independent of the existing Hirsch distribution network. In such
event, SCM shall function as if it were a Hirsch dealer, and
will be able to purchase those products from Hirsch at the most
favorable dealer discount of 50% of the list price in the then
current Hirsch Pricelist. Said purchases of Hirsch products at
the 50% dealer discount will result in and be included in Hirsch
revenue and the revenue base for Networks.
I-1
5. SCM has an ongoing business and sales involving products
sold into the eHealth and ePassport areas and products sold into
the logical access-, banking-, retail- and digital media market.
These products are separate and distinct from products sold by
Hirsch, and these products and business areas are outside of
Hirschs access control business model. As such, they and
all other SCM products sold are and will remain SCM sales and
revenues and have no bearing on Hirsch revenues or the Networks
revenue base. However, if Hirsch decides to sell an integrated
logical and physical access solution, Hirsch will be able to buy
SCM products at the most favorable price offered by SCM and
resell them. Royalties should then be paid based on the physical
access solution and the integration part for the converged
solution. Alternately, should SCM decide to sell an integrated
logical and physical access solution, SCM would then buy Hirsch
products as part of that solution at the most favorable price.
6. To the extent that SCM and Hirsch choose to co-develop
products, there could potentially arise contention over how to
apportion the revenue from such product sales between the two
companies. Clearly, the portion assigned to Hirsch technology
and products would be Hirsch revenues and be included in the
revenue base, while the portion assigned to SCM technology and
products would not. Hirsch will attempt to make an equitable
determination of the relative values as if Hirsch and SCM were
independent companies and were partnering to co-develop such
products. This determination will be made regardless of whether
the co-developed products are sold through Hirsch or SCM
distribution channels Hirsch will advise Networks of such
determination. If Networks objects to the determination and
judges the amounts involved to be material, then Networks agrees
that together with Hirsch they will select and hire an
independent third party to determine the relative valuations.
Such determination will be deemed final. The costs and expenses
of such third party will be shared equally by Hirsch and Secure
Networks. In the unlikely event that Hirsch and Networks cannot
agree on an independent third party, then they will contact the
American Arbitration Association and have a mediator select a
qualified and independent third party.
In our capacity as General Partners of Secure Networks we hereby
acknowledge and accept the above and execute this Amended and
Restated Letter of Understanding, in the firm belief that in so
doing we are protecting the interests of all partners of Secure
Networks, and that by making such acceptance, we help move
forward a business merger that we believe will benefit Secure
Networks and increase its royalty stream. This Amended and
Restated Letter of Understanding amends, restates, and
supersedes the Letter of Understanding dated December 10,
2008 entered into between the parties.
Wishing us all every success going forward.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Parsons
Lawrence W. Midland
I-2
Amended
and Restated Letter of Understanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
To:
|
|
Felix Marx, CEO SCM Microsystems Inc.
|
|
|
|
From:
|
|
Robert J. Parsons, an individual, as a General Partner of Secure
Keyboards Lawrence W. Midland, an individual, as a General
Partner of Secure Keyboards
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
January 30, 2009
|
Dear Felix:
We are quite excited by the proposal you have presented to merge
with Hirsch Electronics. We appreciate the fact that in the
context of this merger, you are sensitive to the issues of the
ongoing royalty stream as it affects Secure Keyboards. We
understand that the current intent is that Hirsch will be a
wholly owned subsidiary of SCM. We also understand that Hirsch
intends to continue to honor the existing Settlement Agreement
until and unless it is modified by the mutual consent of all
parties.
We believe, after reviewing the proposed transaction in detail,
that it will strengthen Hirsch, thereby helping secure and
preserve Keyboards ongoing royalty stream, and further that it
may well be accretive to Hirschs revenues and hence to
Keyboards revenue base and royalty stream based upon the
potential synergies going forward.
We understand that in the interests of proceeding with this
merger, SCM desires to clarify a proposed structure of the
business relationship between SCM and Hirsch as it affects or
relates to the Secure Keyboards royalties. The intent of this
Letter of Understanding is to anticipate and address issues that
could potentially arise as points of contention in a manner that
is fair and equitable to both SCM and Secure Keyboards, and to
express our understanding, support and acceptance of such
resolutions in a manner that allows the merger to proceed toward
consummation.
In our capacity as General Partners of Keyboards, we have an
ongoing fiduciary responsibility to protect Keyboards interests.
Because we believe that the proposed merger benefits Keyboards,
and because we believe the clarifications and characterizations
detailed further below are both fair and reasonable to
Keyboards, we are willing to agree to and grant such
acknowledgement and acceptance.
Subject to the merger being consummated, Robert Parsons, an
individual and General Partner of Secure Keyboards, and Lawrence
Midland, an individual and General Partner of Secure Keyboards,
hereby acknowledge and accept the following characterizations
and clarifications of the business relationship between SCM and
Hirsch and their resulting effects on the companies respective
revenue streams and on Keyboards revenue base:
1. Sales of all such existing products through existing
Hirsch distribution are and will remain Hirsch revenues and part
of the Keyboards revenue base. If SCM technology replaces the
current Hirsch physical access reader offerings on products
which continue to be sold through existing Hirsch distribution,
then such products will be included in Hirschs revenues
and in the revenue base for Keyboards.
2. Hirsch will continue in part to independently develop
its own products. Such products, sold through Hirsch existing
distribution channels, will continue to be construed as Hirsch
revenue and be included in the Keyboards revenue base.
3. The opportunity may exist for SCM to compete in
Hirschs general marketplace, and for SCM to sell its
products which are similar to existing products of Hirschs
competitors or others. As Hirsch currently has no interest in
and receives no benefit from sales to competitors or others,
such equivalent SCM sales are expressly not included in Hirsch
revenue or the revenue base for Keyboards.
4. SCM may have or may create opportunities to sell Hirsch
products through SCMs distribution outside of and
independent of the existing Hirsch distribution network. In such
event, SCM shall function as if it were a Hirsch dealer, and
will be able to purchase those products from Hirsch at the most
favorable dealer discount of 50% of the list price in the then
current Hirsch Pricelist. Said purchases of Hirsch products at
the 50% dealer discount will result in and be included in Hirsch
revenue and the revenue base for Keyboards.
I-3
5. SCM has an ongoing business and sales involving products
sold into the eHealth and ePassport areas and products sold into
the logical access-, banking-, retail- and digital media market.
These products are separate and distinct from products sold by
Hirsch, and these products and business areas are outside of
Hirschs access control business model. As such, they and
all other SCM products sold are and will remain SCM sales and
revenues and have no bearing on Hirsch revenues or the Keyboards
revenue base. However, if Hirsch decides to sell an integrated
logical and physical access solution, Hirsch will be able to buy
SCM products at the most favorable price offered by SCM and
resell them. Royalties should then be paid based on the physical
access solution and the integration part for the converged
solution. Alternately, should SCM decide to sell an integrated
logical and physical access solution, SCM would then buy Hirsch
products as part of that solution at the most favorable price.
6. To the extent that SCM and Hirsch choose to co-develop
products, there could potentially arise contention over how to
apportion the revenue from such product sales between the two
companies. Clearly, the portion assigned to Hirsch technology
and products would be Hirsch revenues and be included in the
revenue base, while the portion assigned to SCM technology and
products would not. Hirsch will attempt to make an equitable
determination of the relative values as if Hirsch and SCM were
independent companies and were partnering to co-develop such
products. This determination will be made regardless of whether
the co-developed products are sold through Hirsch or SCM
distribution channels Hirsch will advise Keyboards of such
determination. If Keyboards objects to the determination and
judges the amounts involved to be material, then Keyboards
agrees that together with Hirsch they will select and hire an
independent third party to determine the relative valuations.
Such determination will be deemed final. The costs and expenses
of such third party will be shared equally by Hirsch and Secure
Keyboards. In the unlikely event that Hirsch and Keyboards
cannot agree on an independent third party, then they will
contact the American Arbitration Association and have a mediator
select a qualified and independent third party.
In our capacity as two of the four General Partners of Secure
Keyboards we hereby acknowledge and accept the above and execute
this Amended and Restated Letter of Understanding, in the firm
belief that in so doing we are protecting the interests of all
partners of Secure Keyboards, and that by making such
acceptance, we help move forward a business merger that we
believe will benefit Secure Keyboards and increase its royalty
stream. This Amended and Restated Letter of Understanding
amends, restates, and supersedes the Letter of Understanding
dated December 10, 2008 entered into between the parties
hereto in its entirety.
Wishing us all every success going forward.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Parsons
Lawrence W. Midland
I-4
Annex J
NON-COMPETITION
AND
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT
This Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement (this
Agreement) is dated as of December 10,
2008, by and between SCM Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (Parent), and Lawrence Midland
(the Holder).
WHEREAS, Parent, Hirsch Electronics Corporation, a California
corporation (the Company), and certain other
parties thereto have entered into that certain Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated as of December 10, 2008 (the
Merger Agreement), pursuant to which, among
other things, through a two-step merger the Company will be
acquired by and become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent and
be transformed into a new Delaware limited liability company
(together as used herein, the Merger).
WHEREAS, Holder is the beneficial owner of the stock of the
Company held by the affiliates of the Holder set forth on
Exhibit A attached hereto, and Holder shall receive
consideration in connection with the Merger.
WHEREAS, Holder understands and agrees that this Agreement is
offered and accepted as partial consideration to the sale of a
business and shall be construed as such and not as an employment
contract.
WHEREAS, as an inducement for and a condition to Parent agreeing
to enter into the Merger Agreement and in consideration of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, concurrently
with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Holder has agreed to
enter into this Agreement, which is necessary to preserve the
value of the business being acquired by Parent after the Merger.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
promises, representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the Company and Holder agree as follows:
1. Definitions. For purposes of
this Agreement, capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined
herein but which are defined in the Merger Agreement shall have
the meanings ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement, unless
the context clearly indicates otherwise. In addition, the
following terms used herein shall have the meaning given to them
below:
a. Business means any line of business
in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities (which shall include any parent or sister company) or
any of their respective successors or assigns is engaged as of
either the date of this Agreement or the Closing Date or
currently proposes to be engaged as either of the date of this
Agreement or as of the Closing Date.
b. Restricted Territory shall mean each
and every country, province, state, city, or other political
subdivision of the world in which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any of their respective
successors or assigns is engaged as of either the date of this
Agreement or the Closing Date or currently proposes to be
engaged as either of the date of this Agreement or as of the
Closing Date in the Business.
c. Term of this Agreement shall mean the
period of time commencing at the Closing and ending on the one
(1) year anniversary of the Closing Date.
2. Effective Date. This Agreement
shall automatically and immediately become effective at, and not
before, the Effective Time, as such term is defined in the
Merger Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, this Agreement
shall not become effective, shall have no force or effect, and
shall be null and void.
J-1
3. Non-Competition. During the
Term of this Agreement and anywhere in the Restricted Territory,
the Holder agrees that, without the prior written consent of
Parent, he or she shall not:
a. directly or through any agent, acquire or hold any
interest in, or participate in or facilitate the financing,
operation, management or control of any firm, partnership, third
party, corporation, person, entity, business or other enterprise
which is engaged in the Business;
b. directly or through any agent, be or become an officer,
director, stockholder, owner, co-owner, partner, trustee,
consultant, or advisor to any firm, partnership, corporation,
person, entity or business which is engaged in the Business;
c. become employed by, or contract to provide services to,
any firm, partnership, corporation, person, entity or business,
which is engaged in the Business;
d. interfere with the business of the Company, any of its
Subsidiaries or its successors or assigns (as applicable), or
approach, contact or solicit any of the Company or its
Subsidiaries customers or investors on behalf of any firm,
partnership, corporation, person, entity or business with
respect to any product, technology or service which (whether for
profit or not for profit) competes or may compete with the
Business; or
e. contract or permit Holders name or likeness to be
used by any firm, partnership, corporation, person, entity or
business which offers to its customers any product, technology
or service which competes with the Business;
provided, however, that nothing in this
Section 3 or this Agreement shall prevent Holder
from owning as a passive investment less than 1% of the
outstanding shares of the capital stock of a publicly-held
corporation if (i) such shares are actively traded on the
New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Global Market or similar
market or exchange and (ii) Holder is not otherwise
associated directly or indirectly with such corporation or any
affiliate of such corporation.
4. Non-Solicitation. Holder
further agrees that during the Term of this Agreement and
anywhere in the Restricted Territory, without the prior written
consent of Parent, he or she shall not:
a. personally or through others, encourage, recruit, hire,
induce, attempt to induce, solicit or attempt to solicit (on
Holders own behalf or on behalf of any other person or
entity), or take any other action which is intended to induce or
encourage, or has the effect of inducing or encouraging, any
employee or contractor, current or during the prior six-month
period, to terminate or alter his or her employment with the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any
of their respective successors or assigns, or to accept
employment with or perform services for any third party, firm,
company, entity, person, business or other enterprise, whether
such person is a full-time, part-time or temporary employee and
whether such employment is pursuant to a written agreement, for
a predetermined period, or is at-will; or
b. personally or through others, directly or indirectly,
interfere or attempt to interfere with the relationship of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any
of their respective successors or assigns (as applicable) with
any customers, suppliers, consultants, clients, licensees,
licensors, landlords, strategic partners or vendors or other
business relations to cease doing business or withdraw, curtail
or cancel or otherwise alter their business dealings or
relationship;
provided, however, that notwithstanding the
foregoing, for purposes of this Agreement, the placement of
general advertisements which may be targeted to a particular
geographic or technical area but which are not targeted directly
or indirectly towards employees of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any of their respective
successors or assigns is engaged shall not be deemed to be a
solicitation under this Agreement.
5. Non-Disparagement. Holder
agrees not to make any public statements (whether written or
oral and whether to the media, any third party or otherwise),
that are detrimental, prejudicial, disparaging, libelous,
slanderous or damaging to, or would otherwise reflect negatively
on the reputation of, the Business or the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or any of their respective
members, officers, employees, representatives, counsel,
affiliates, successors, assigns, or products or businesses.
Holder further agrees that he will not act in
J-2
any manner that might interfere with the Business or disparage
the reputation of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities or any of their respective members,
officers, employees, representatives, counsel, affiliates,
successors, assigns, or products or businesses. Nothing set
forth in this Section 5 shall prohibit or limit in
any way Holders right to accurately and honestly respond
as required or to cooperate with any valid government, court or
regulatory order or request.
6. Severability of Covenants. The
covenants contained in Sections 1, 3, 4 and 5 herein
shall be construed as a series of separate covenants, one for
each country, province, state, city or other political
subdivision of the Restricted Territory. If, in any judicial
proceeding, a court of competent jurisdiction in a final and
non-appealable decision refuses to enforce any of such separate
covenants (or any part thereof), then such unenforceable
covenant (or such part) shall be eliminated from this Agreement
to the extent necessary to permit the remaining separate
covenants (or portions thereof) to be enforced. In the event
that the provisions of Sections 1, 3, 4 and 5 are
deemed to exceed the time, geographic or scope limitations
permitted by applicable law, then such provisions shall be
reformed to the maximum time, geographic or scope limitations,
as the case may be, permitted by applicable Law.
7. Independence of
Obligations. The covenants and obligations of
Holder set forth in this Agreement shall be construed as
independent of any other agreement or arrangement between
Holder, on the one hand, and Parent on the other. The Holder
nevertheless understands and agrees to his or her obligations
and the restraints they may impose and in particular:
a. Holder Acknowledgement of Receipt of
Value. Holder acknowledges that
(i) Holder is an officer, significant stockholder
and/or
optionholder, key employee,
and/or a key
member of the management of Company; (ii) the goodwill
associated with the existing business, customers and assets of
Company prior to the Merger is an integral component of the
value of Company to Parent and is reflected in the consideration
payable to Holder in connection with the Merger, and
(iii) Holders agreement as set forth herein is
necessary to preserve the value of Company for Parent following
the Merger.
b. Holder Acknowledgement of
Restraints. Holder also acknowledges and
agrees that the limitations of time, geography and scope of
activity agreed to in this Agreement are reasonable because,
among other things: (i) Company and Parent are engaged in a
highly competitive industry, (ii) Holder has unique access
to, and will continue to have access to, the trade secrets and
know-how of Company and Parent, including, without limitation,
the plans and strategy (and, in particular, the competitive
strategy) of Company and Parent, and (iii) this Agreement
provides no more protection than is necessary to protect
Parents interests in its goodwill, trade secrets and
confidential information.
c. Holder Acknowledgement of
Duration. Holder acknowledges, understands
and agrees that, in exchange for the consideration received as a
result of the Merger, he is voluntarily accepting that
Holders obligations under Sections 1, 3, 4 and
5 of this Agreement shall remain in effect for the Term of
the Agreement regardless of Holders employment status or
any termination thereof for any or no reason. Holder
acknowledges that, from and after the Closing, Holder will be
subject to Company and Parent confidential information and
proprietary information policies and agreements and agrees to
comply with such agreements and policies.
8. Enforcement. The Holder
understands, acknowledges and agrees that:
a. The Holder has gained a special and unique expertise in
the business operations of the Company that is of unique and
peculiar value and that the provisions of this Agreement are
required for the fair and reasonable protection of the
Parents proprietary interest in the Companys
business, and are intended to prohibit Holder and any third
parties from benefiting from the Holders historical
relationship with the Company at the expense and economic
detriment of Parent or its successors or assigns (as applicable).
b. The various rights and duties created hereunder are
extraordinary and unique, so that the Parent and its successors
or assigns (as applicable) will suffer significant and
irreparable injury that cannot adequately be compensated for by
monetary damages alone in the event of the Holders breach
or violation of any covenant or undertaking contained in this
Agreement and that the remedies at law available to the Company
and its subsidiaries and affiliated entities will otherwise be
inadequate. The Holder, therefore, agrees that notwithstanding
Section 10(f), Parent or its successors or assigns
(as applicable) in addition to such damages and other remedies
and without limiting any other remedy or right that they may
have, shall have the immediate right to
J-3
obtain a temporary, preliminary and final injunction against the
Holder issued by a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining any
such alleged breach or violation without posting any bond that
might otherwise be required, and the Holder agrees that he or
she shall not plead adequacy of any relief at law available to
the Parent or its successors or assigns (as applicable)
(including monetary damages) as a defense to any petition, claim
or motion for preliminary or final injunctive relief to enforce
any provision of this Agreement.
c. In the event that the Holder or the Parent or its
successors or assigns (as applicable) should contest the
enforceability of any provision of this Agreement in any court
of competent jurisdiction, then any time period associated with
any such challenged provision shall be deemed suspended at the
time of filing the action in which such enforceability is
contested. In the event that the enforceability of any such
provision is upheld by such court of competent jurisdiction, all
periods of appeal having expired thereon, then the remaining
portion of any such time period shall automatically thereafter
once again become effective. For purposes of this Agreement, the
remaining portion of any such time period shall be the
difference between the full stated time period in this Agreement
relating to any such provision, less any time that Holder
complied with such provision prior to the filing of the
aforesaid action and less any time that Holder was restrained by
temporary restraining order, permanent injunction or similar
order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction from
violating any such provision during the pendency of such action
or proceeding.
d. The rights and remedies of Parent hereunder are not
exclusive of or limited by any other rights or remedies that
Parent may have, whether at law, in equity, by contract or
otherwise, all of which shall be cumulative (and not
alternative). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
the rights and remedies of Parent hereunder, and the obligations
and liabilities of Holder hereunder, are in addition to their
respective rights, remedies, obligations and liabilities under
the law of unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets
and the like. This Agreement does not limit Holders
obligations or the rights of Parent (or any affiliate of Parent)
under the terms of any other agreement between Holder and Parent
or any affiliate of Parent.
e. If Parent, any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities or their respective successors or assigns (as
applicable) successfully, in whole or part, asserts an action at
law or in equity to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement,
then Parent, its Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or its
successors or assigns (as applicable), shall be entitled to
recover from Holder all reasonable attorneys fees, costs,
and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to
which it may be entitled. If Holder successfully, in whole or
part, asserts an action at law or in equity to enforce any of
the terms of this Agreement, then Holder shall be entitled to
recover from Parent, any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities or their respective successors or assigns (as
applicable) all reasonable attorneys fees, costs, and
necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which
Holder may be entitled.
f. Other Remedies. Any and all
remedies herein expressly conferred upon a party will be deemed
cumulative with and not exclusive of any other remedy conferred
hereby, or by law or equity upon such party, and the exercise by
a party of any one remedy will not preclude the exercise of any
other remedy.
9. Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed
duly given (a) on the date of delivery if delivered
personally, or if by facsimile, upon written confirmation of
receipt by facsimile, (b) on the first (1st) Business Day
following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized courier under circumstances in which such courier
guarantees
next-day
delivery (except in the case of overseas delivery, in which case
notice shall be deemed duly given on the third (3rd) Business
Day following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized international courier under circumstances in which
such courier guarantees such delivery) or (c) on the
earlier of confirmed receipt or the fifth Business Day following
the date of mailing if delivered by registered or certified
mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid (except in the
case of overseas delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed
duly given on confirmed receipt if delivered by registered or
certified
J-4
mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid). All notices
hereunder shall be delivered to the addresses set forth below,
or pursuant to such other instructions as may be designated in
writing by the party to receive such notice:
(i) If to Parent, to:
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13,
85737, Ismaning Germany
Attention: Felix Marx
Facsimile: +49.89.9595.5170
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105
Attention: Michael L. Reed
Facsimile: 415.374.8459
(ii) If to the Company:
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
1900-B Carnegie Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Attention: Secretary
Facsimile: 949.250.7372
(iii) if to Holder, to the address of Holder set forth on
the signature page hereto.
10. Miscellaneous.
a. Employment Status. Holder
acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement does not address and
does not alter Holders employment status with the Company
or Parent, as the case may be, as it may be set forth in other
agreements or arrangements.
b. Entire Agreement. Except as
expressly set forth in Section 5(a), this Agreement,
together with the Proprietary Information Agreement, constitutes
the entire agreement, and supersede all prior written
agreements, arrangements, communications and understandings and
all prior and contemporaneous oral agreements, arrangements,
communications and understandings among the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof and thereof.
c. Amendments and Waiver. This
Agreement may not be amended, modified or supplemented in any
manner, whether by course of conduct or otherwise, except by an
instrument in writing specifically designated as an amendment
hereto, signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto and
Parent. Any agreement on the part of a party to any waiver shall
be valid only if set forth in a written instrument executed and
delivered by such party. No failure or delay of any party in
exercising any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a
waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any
such right or power, or any abandonment or discontinuance of
steps to enforce such right or power, or any course of conduct,
preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise
of any other right or power.
d. Binding Effect; Assignment. The
rights and obligations of this Agreement shall bind and inure to
the benefit of any successor of the Parent by reorganization,
merger or consolidation, or any assignee of all or substantially
all of the Parents business and properties. The Parent may
assign its rights and delegate its obligations hereunder to its
affiliates without the consent of Holder, provided that
Parent remains ultimately liable for all of Parents
obligations hereunder. The Holders rights or obligations
under this Agreement may not be assigned by the Holder.
e. Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
and public policy (other than conflict of laws principles) of
the State of California applicable to contracts executed within
such state.
J-5
f. Arbitration. The Holder and the
Parent agree that in the event a dispute arises concerning or
relating to this Agreement, all such disputes shall be submitted
to binding arbitration before an arbitrator experienced in
applicable law. Said arbitration will be conducted in accordance
with the rules applicable to disputes of Judicial Arbitration
and Mediation Services (JAMS). The Parent
will be responsible for paying any filing fees and costs of the
arbitration proceeding itself (for example, arbitrators
fees, conference room, transcripts), but each party shall be
responsible for its own attorneys fees. The Parent and the
Holder agree that this promise to arbitrate covers any disputes
that the Parent may have against the Holder, or that the Holder
may have against the Parent and all of its affiliated entities
and their directors, officers and the Holders, arising out of or
relating to this Agreement, including any claims concerning the
validity, interpretation, effect or violation of this Agreement;
violation of any federal, state, or local law and any tort. The
Parent and the Holder further agree that arbitration as provided
in this Section 10(f) shall be the exclusive and
binding remedy for any such dispute and will be used instead of
any court action, which is hereby expressly waived, except for
any request by either party hereto for temporary or preliminary
injunctive relief pending arbitration in accordance with
applicable law, or an administrative claim with an
administrative agency. The Federal Arbitration Act shall govern
the interpretation and enforcement of such arbitration
proceeding. The arbitrator shall apply the substantive law (and
the law of remedies, if applicable) of the State of California,
or federal law, if California law is preempted. The arbitration
shall be conducted in Los Angeles, California, unless otherwise
mutually agreed.
THE COMPANY AND THE HOLDER ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT BY
AGREEING TO ARBITRATE, THEY ARE WAIVING ANY RIGHT TO BRING AN
ACTION AGAINST THE OTHER IN A COURT OF LAW, EITHER STATE OR
FEDERAL, AND ARE WAIVING THE RIGHT TO HAVE CLAIMS AND DAMAGES,
IF ANY, DETERMINED BY A JURY.
g. Severability. Whenever
possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this
Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective
and valid under applicable law. Except as provided in
Section 8 hereof, in the event that any provision of
this Agreement or the application thereof, becomes or is
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal,
void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement will
continue in full force and effect and the application of such
provision to other persons or circumstances will be interpreted
so as reasonably to effect the intent of the parties hereto.
Except as provided in Section 8 hereof, the parties
further agree to replace such void or unenforceable provision of
this Agreement with a valid and enforceable provision that will
achieve, to the extent possible, the economic, business and
other purposes of such void or unenforceable provision.
h. Holder Acknowledgment. Holder
acknowledges and agrees that he has had the opportunity to
consult legal counsel in regard to this Agreement, that he has
read and understands this Agreement, that he is fully aware of
its legal effect, and that he has entered into it freely and
voluntarily and based on his own judgment and not on any
representations, warranties or promises other than those
contained in this Agreement. HOLDER CERTIFIES AS FOLLOWS: I HAVE
READ THE ENTIRE CONTENTS OF THIS AGREEMENT BEFORE SUBSCRIBING MY
NAME HERETO; THAT I FULLY UNDERSTAND ALL THE TERMS, CONDITIONS,
AND PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, THAT I HAVE RECEIVED
A COPY OF THIS AGREEMENT, AND THAT I HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY AT
MY OPTION TO HAVE THIS AGREEMENT REVIEWED BY MY ATTORNEY.
i. Further Assurances. Each of the
parties agrees to execute, acknowledge, deliver and perform, and
cause to be executed, acknowledged, delivered and performed, at
any time and from time to time, as the case may be, all such
further acts, deeds, assignments, transfers, conveyances, powers
of attorney and assurances as may be reasonably necessary to
carry out the provisions or intent of this Agreement.
j. Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall
be considered one and the same instrument and shall become
effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each
of the parties and delivered to the other party.
[Signature
pages follow]
J-6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this
Agreement, or caused this Agreement to be duly executed, as of
the day and year first above written.
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
Felix Marx
Chief Executive Officer
HOLDER
Name: Larry Midland
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
MIDLAND FAMILY TRUST EST JAN 29 2002
L.W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN
FOR ASHLEY MARIE MIDLAND UCGMA
L.W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
J-7
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR ALISON MIDLAND UCGMA
L.W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
L W MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR TAYLOR ANN MIDLAND UCGMA
L.W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
LW MIDLAND AS CUSTODIAN FOR MADISON KATHLEEN MIDLAND UCGMA
L.W. MIDLAND, Trustee
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
J-8
Exhibit A
Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
Midland Family Trust Est Jan 29, 2002
|
|
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Ashley Marie Midland UGMA
|
|
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Alison Midland UGMA
|
|
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Taylor Ann Midland UGMA
|
|
|
|
L W Midland as Custodian for Madison Kathleen Midland
|
J-10
Annex K
EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT
This Employment Agreement (this Agreement) is
dated as of December 10, 2008, by and between Hirsch
Electronics Corporation, a California corporation (the
Company), and Mr. Robert Beliles (the
Employee).
WHEREAS, SCM Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(Parent), the Company and certain other
parties thereto have entered into that certain Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated as of December 10, 2008 (the
Merger Agreement), pursuant to which, among
other things, through a two-step merger the Company will become
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent and be transformed into a
new Delaware limited liability company (together as used herein,
the Merger).
WHEREAS, as an inducement for and a condition to Parent agreeing
to enter into the Merger Agreement and in consideration of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, concurrently
with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Employee and the
Company have agreed to enter into this Agreement which will set
forth the terms of Employees employment by the Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
promises, representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the Company and Employee agree as follows:
1. Effective Date. This Agreement
shall automatically and immediately become effective at, and not
before, the Effective Time, as such term is defined in the
Merger Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, this Agreement
shall not become effective, shall have no force or effect, and
shall be null and void.
2. Employment; Employment Period; Position;
Duties.
a. The Company hereby agrees to employ Employee, and
Employee hereby accepts such employment with the Company, in
each case, on the terms and subject to the conditions
hereinafter set forth. Subject to any earlier termination of
Employees employment as provided herein, Employees
employment hereunder shall be for an initial term commencing at
the Effective Time and ending on the third (3rd) anniversary of
the Effective Time (the Employment Period).
Beginning on the third (3rd) anniversary and continuing on each
anniversary thereafter, the employment agreement shall
automatically extend for a period of one (1) year, subject
to any termination of Employees employment as provided
herein.
b. Employee shall serve as the Companys Vice
President, Enterprise, Business Development, and shall report
directly to Larry Midland (the Reporting
Officer). Employee shall also serve in such other
capacities as may be requested from time to time by the
Reporting Officer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and/or the
Board of Directors of the Company or the sole member of the
Company, as the case may be (the
Board/Member) or a duly authorized committee
thereof. Employee shall perform such duties as are customarily
associated with his position and as reasonably required by the
Reporting Officer. Employee shall also render such other
services for the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities as the Company may from time to time request that are
generally commensurate with such Employees title. Employee
agrees to serve the Company faithfully and perform such duties
and services using his best efforts and abilities. Employee
agrees to devote his full-time attention and energies
exclusively to the business of the Company and the performance
of his duties and services, and to act at all times in the best
interests of the Company. Employee agrees to conduct himself at
all times in a business-like and professional manner as
appropriate for a person in Employees position and to
represent the Company in all respects in a manner that comports
with sound business judgment in the highest ethical standards.
Employee will be subject to and abide by the policies and
procedures of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated
companies, as adopted and revised by the Company or any of its
subsidiaries and affiliated companies from time to time.
Employee shall be subject to the direction of the Company, which
shall retain full control over the means and methods by which
Employee performs his duties and the above services and of the
place(s) at which all such duties and services are rendered.
Employees principal place of employment shall be at the
Companys offices in Santa Ana, California.
K-1
3. Compensation; Benefits.
a. Base Salary. As compensation
for services rendered to the Company, Employee shall be entitled
to a base salary at the annual rate of $200,000 (two hundred
thousand dollars), payable in accordance with the regular
payroll practices of the Company for its employees. Employee
shall be eligible to such merit increases in Employees
base salary, if any, as may be determined from time to time in
the sole discretion of the
Board/Member.
Employees annual base salary rate, as in effect from time
to time, is hereinafter referred to as the Base
Salary.
b. Bonus. Employee shall be
eligible to receive an annual target based variable bonus, of up
to 40% of the Employees annual base salary, based upon the
achievement of personal performance targets established by the
Parents Board of Directors in consultation with Employee,
and the overall success of the Company. Any bonus would be
subject to the terms and conditions of the Parents MBO
Bonus Program, as the same may be amended from time to time, and
the Employees continuing employment. The achievement of
the performance and other target would be determined and any
resulting bonus would be payable on a quarterly basis (up to a
maximum bonus of 10% of the Employees annual base salary
per quarter). A copy of the Parents MBO Bonus Program as
currently in effect is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
c. Stock Options. Upon the
Effective Time, the Employee shall be eligible to participate in
Parents Stock Option Plan. It is anticipated that the
Employee will receive a one-time grant of a non-qualified stock
option to purchase 25,000 (twenty-five thousand) shares of the
Parents common stock, subject to the terms and conditions
of the Parents Stock Option Plan. Any such grant is
subject to approval by the Parents Board of Directors. A
copy of the Parents Stock Option Plan as currently in
effect is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
d. Other Employee
Benefits. Employee shall be eligible to
receive or participate in any incentive, retirement, vacation,
sick or family leave, reimbursement for travel and entertainment
expenses, health and insurance or other benefits of the Company,
as in effect from time to time, on the same basis as other
employees of the Company occupying positions with responsibility
and salary comparable to that of Employee, but in any event not
materially inferior to the benefits the Employee enjoyed as an
employee of the Company prior to the Merger. The Company may at
any time and from time to time change, amend, modify or
completely eliminate any such plans, programs and benefits
available to its employees and Employees participation in
any such plans, programs and benefits shall not affect such
right of the Company; Employee agrees and acknowledges that he
shall have no vested rights under or to participate in any such
plans, programs and benefits except as expressly provided under
the terms thereof.
4. Termination of
Employment. Employees employment with
the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities
may be terminated by Company at any time and for any or no
reason. Employee will be required to give the Company three
(3) months advance written notice of any resignation of
Employees employment. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Agreement, the provisions of this Section 4 shall
exclusively govern Employees rights upon termination of
employment with the Company and any of its subsidiaries or
affiliates entities for Cause, death or Disability or any other
reason.
a. By the Company For Cause; Resignation by
Employee. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Company for Cause at any time. For purposes of
this Agreement, Cause shall mean:
(i) unsatisfactory performance in any material respect of
Employees duties, services or responsibilities (as
generally described in this Agreement) as determined by the
Board/Member, provided that the Company has given
Employee written notice specifying the unsatisfactory
performance of his duties and responsibilities and a reasonable
opportunity to cure, and Employee has failed to cure such
deficiencies; (ii) a material breach by Employee of any of
his obligations hereunder which remains uncured after the lapse
of thirty (30) days following the date that the Company has
given Employee written notice thereof; (iii) a breach by
Employee of his duty not to engage in any transaction that
represents, directly or indirectly, self-dealing with the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities which
has not been approved by a majority of the disinterested
directors of the Board/Member or of the terms of his employment;
(iv) any act of intentional dishonesty, willful misconduct,
embezzlement, intentional fraud or similar conduct involving the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities;
(v) the conviction or the plea of nolo contendere or
the equivalent in respect of a felony involving moral turpitude;
or (vi) intentional, malicious infliction of any damage of
a material nature to any property of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities. If Employees
employment is terminated by the Company for Cause or by Employee
for any reason, Employee shall be entitled to receive following
the date of such termination: (A) the Base Salary through
the date of termination;
K-2
(B) reimbursement for any unreimbursed business expenses
properly incurred by Employee in accordance with Company policy
prior to the date of Employees termination; and
(C) any earned but unpaid benefits, if any, through the
date of termination in accordance with the applicable employee
benefit plan of the Company (the amounts described in
clauses (A) through (C) of this Section 4(a),
reduced by any amounts owed by Employee to the Company, being
referred to as the Accrued Rights). In
addition, except as may otherwise be expressly provided in any
plan, agreement or other instrument that governs the terms of
any stock option or other incentive compensation, all unvested
stock options and other incentive compensation shall immediately
be cancelled and forfeited. Following such termination of
Employees employment by the Company for Cause or by
Employee for any reason, except as set forth in this
Section 4(a), Employee shall have no further rights to any
compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
b. Disability or
Death. Employees employment shall
terminate upon Employees death and may be terminated by
the Company if Employee becomes (in the good faith judgment of
the Board/Member) physically or mentally incapacitated and is
therefore unable for a period of three (3) consecutive
months or for an aggregate of six (6) months in any twelve
(12) consecutive month period to perform Employees
duties (such incapacity is hereinafter referred to as
Disability). Upon termination of
Employees employment hereunder by reason of his Disability
or death, Employee or Employees estate (as the case may
be) shall be entitled to receive the Accrued Rights following
the date of such termination. Employees rights with
respect to any stock option or other incentive compensation
shall be determined by the terms of any plan, agreement or other
instrument that governs the terms of any such stock options or
other incentive compensation. Following Employees
termination of employment due to death or Disability, except as
set forth in this Section 4(b), Employee shall have no
further rights to any compensation or benefits from the Company
or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this
Agreement or otherwise.
c. By the Company Without
Cause. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Company at any time without Cause. If
Employees employment is terminated by the Company without
Cause (other than by reason of death or Disability), Employee
shall be entitled to receive: (i) the Accrued Rights
following the date of such termination; and (ii) subject to
Employees execution (within thirty (30) days
following the date of termination) and non-revocation of a
release of claims in favor of the Company in a form provided by
the Company (which release excludes from its scope claims under
any continuing right under any benefit or stock option plan or
agreement), a payment equal to the amount of Employees
then current Base Salary that would have been payable over a
three (3) month period following the date of such
termination, payable monthly in accordance with the
Companys normal payment schedule and practices beginning
on the next regular payroll distribution after the date that the
release of claims becomes irrevocable, and all previously
granted unvested options shall cease vesting upon the date of
such termination. Following Employees termination of
employment by the Company without Cause (other than by reason of
Employees death or Disability), except as set forth in
this Section 4(c), Employee shall have no further rights to
any compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
d. By the Employee For Good
Reason. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Employee for Good Reason (as hereinafter
defined). For purposes of this Agreement, Good
Reason shall mean the occurrence of any of the following
without the Employees prior written consent: (i) a
material reduction of Employees duties, position, job
title, or responsibilities; (ii) a reduction of
Employees base salary or total compensation package;
(iii) Employee being forced to relocate; or (iv) the
Company requires Employee to perform illegal or fraudulent acts.
However, none of the foregoing events or conditions shall
constitute Good Reason unless: (x) the Employee delivers to
the Company a written notice identifying in reasonable detail
the act or acts constituting Good Reason and his
intention to so terminate his employment (a Notice of
Good Reason), within fifteen (15) days following
the Employees knowledge of the circumstances constituting
Good Reason; (y) the Company does not reverse
or otherwise cure the event or condition within fifteen
(15) days after the date that the Notice of Good Reason is
delivered; and (z) the Employee resigns his employment no
earlier than five (5) and no later than fifteen
(15) days following the expiration of that cure period. If
the Employee terminates his employment for Good Reason (other
than by reason of death or Disability), Employee shall be
entitled to receive: (i) the Accrued Rights following the
date of such termination; and (ii) subject to
Employees execution (within thirty (30) days
following the date of termination) and non-revocation of a
release of claims in favor of the Company in a form provided by
the Company
K-3
(which release excludes from its scope claims under any
continuing right under any benefit or stock option plan or
agreement), a payment equal to the amount of Employees
then current Base Salary that would have been payable over a
three (3) month period following the date of such
termination, payable monthly in accordance with the
Companys normal payment schedule and practices beginning
on the next regular payroll distribution after the date that the
release of claims becomes irrevocable, and all previously
granted unvested options shall cease vesting upon the date of
such termination. Following Employees termination of
employment by the Employee for Good Reason(other than by reason
of death or Disability), except as set forth in this
Section 4(d), Employee shall have no further rights to any
compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
e. Company Property. Upon any
termination of Employees employment with the Company or
any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or earlier upon
request, Employee shall promptly return to the Company all
property of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated
entities in Employees possession and deliver to the
Company all copies of all correspondence, documents, data and
other materials belonging to or containing proprietary
information of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities.
f. Section 409A Provisions.
(i) A termination of employment shall not be deemed to have
occurred for purposes of any provision of this Agreement
providing for the payment of any amounts or benefits upon or
following a termination of employment unless such termination is
also a separation from service within the meaning of
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code) and, for purposes of any
such provision of this Agreement, references to a
termination, termination of employment
or like terms shall mean separation from service. If
Employee is deemed on the date of termination to be a
specified employee within the meaning of that term
under Section 409A(a)(2)(B) of the Code, then with regard
to any payment or the provision of any benefit that is
considered deferred compensation under Section 409A of the
Code payable on account of a separation from
service, such payment or benefit shall be made or provided
at the date which is the earlier of (A) the expiration of
the six (6)-month period measured from the date of such
separation from service of Employee, and
(B) the date of Employees death (the Delay
Period). Upon the expiration of the Delay Period, all
payments and benefits delayed pursuant to this paragraph
(whether they would have otherwise been payable in a single sum
or in installments in the absence of such delay) shall be paid
or reimbursed to Employee in a lump sum as soon as
administratively practicable, and any remaining payments and
benefits due under this Agreement shall be paid or provided in
accordance with the normal payment dates specified for them
herein.
(ii) With regard to any provision herein that provides for
reimbursement of costs and expenses or in-kind benefits, except
as permitted by Section 409A of the Code, (A) the
right to reimbursement or in-kind benefits shall not be subject
to liquidation or exchange for another benefit, (B) the
amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind
benefits, provided during any taxable year shall not affect the
expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind benefits to be
provided, in any other taxable year, provided that the
foregoing clause (B) shall not be violated without regard
to expenses reimbursed under any arrangement covered by
Section 105(b) of the Code solely because such expenses are
subject to a limit related to the period the arrangement is in
effect and (C) such payments shall be made on or before the
last day of Employees taxable year following the taxable
year in which the expense occurred.
K-4
5. Restrictive Covenants.
a. Confidentiality. Employee
acknowledges that Employee has signed and agrees to be bound by
all of the terms and conditions of that certain Non-Disclosure
Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement (the
Proprietary Information Agreement), attached
as Exhibit C to this Agreement, which agreement
shall remain in full force and effect at all times during and
after the Employment Period, and the terms of which shall apply
with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
herein or in the Proprietary Information Agreement, neither this
Agreement or the Proprietary Information Agreement shall affect
any of Employees pre-existing obligations under any
non-disclosure, non-competition or proprietary information and
inventions agreement or similar agreement between Employee and
the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities.
b. Agreement Not to
Compete/Non-Solicitation. Employee agrees
that during the Employment Period, Employee shall not, directly
or indirectly:
(i) acquire or hold any interest in, manage, operate, join,
control, or engage or participate in any capacity in the
financing, ownership, management, operation or control of, be or
become an officer, director, stockholder, owner, co-owner,
partner, trustee, consultant, or advisor to, contract or permit
Employees name or likeness to be used by, or be employed
by, render or perform services for or connected in any manner
with, any third party, firm, company, entity, person, business
or other enterprise which is engaged in any line of business in
which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities or any of their respective successors or assigns is
engaged or proposes to be engaged during the Employment Period;
provided, however, that such restriction shall not
apply to any ownership as a passive investment of less than 1%
of the outstanding shares of the capital stock of a
publicly-held corporation if (A) such shares are actively
traded on the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Global
Market or similar market or exchange and (B) Employee is
not otherwise associated directly or indirectly with such
corporation or any affiliate of such corporation;
(ii) encourage, induce, recruit, hire, solicit or attempt
to solicit or induce, or take any other action which is intended
to induce or encourage, or has the effect of inducing or
encouraging, any person who is a full-time, part-time or
temporary employee or contractor of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities or who was an employee or
contractor of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities at any time during prior six-month period,
or encourage or otherwise cause any such employee or contractor
to terminate or alter his or her employment or other
relationship, whether such employment is pursuant to a written
agreement, for a predetermined period, or is at-will, with the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or to
accept employment with or perform services for any third party,
firm, company, entity, person, business or other
enterprise; or
(iii) interfere or attempt to interfere with existing
relationships that may exist between the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or any of their respective
successors or assigns, and any of their respective customers,
suppliers, consultants, clients, licensees, licensors, landlords
or other business relations, or approach, contact, solicit,
induce, request, advise, recruit or otherwise encourage any
existing or prospective customers, suppliers, consultants,
clients, licensees, licensors, landlords, strategic partners or
vendors, or other business relations of the Company or any of
its subsidiaries or affiliated entities to cease doing business
or withdraw, curtail or cancel or otherwise alter their business
dealings or relationship with the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities (including by making any
negative or disparaging statements or communications about the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities),
including on behalf of or to move such business or relationship
to, any third party, firm, company, entity, person, business or
other enterprise; provided, however, that
notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of this Agreement,
the placement of general advertisements which may be targeted to
a particular geographic or technical area but which are not
targeted directly or indirectly towards employees of the Company
or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any of
their respective successors or assigns is engaged shall not be
deemed to be a solicitation under this Agreement.
(iv) Exceptions to this Section 5(b) can only be
approved by prior written approval of the Parents Board of
Directors.
K-5
c. During the Employment Period and following any
termination of this Agreement, Employee agrees not to make any
public statements (whether written or oral and whether to the
media, any third party or otherwise), that are detrimental,
prejudicial, disparaging, libelous, slanderous or damaging to,
or would otherwise reflect negatively on the reputation of, the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any
of their respective members, officers, employees,
representatives, counsel, affiliates, successors, assigns,
products or businesses. Employee further agrees that he will not
act in any manner that might interfere with the business or
disparage the reputation of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any of their respective
members, officers, employees, representatives, counsel or
affiliates. Nothing set forth in this Section 5(c) shall
prohibit or limit in any way Employees right to accurately
and honestly respond as required or to cooperate with any valid
government, court or regulatory order or request.
d. Remedies. Employee acknowledges
that in the event of breach or threatened breach by Employee of
any of the terms of this Section 5, the Company and its
subsidiaries and affiliated entities would suffer significant
and irreparable harm that can not be satisfactorily compensated
in monetary terms, and that the remedies at law available to the
Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated entities will
otherwise be inadequate and, therefore, the Company and its
subsidiaries and affiliated entities shall be entitled,
notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10(e), to
specific performance of this Agreement by Employee, including
the immediate ex parte issuance of a temporary,
preliminary and final injunction enjoining Employee from any
such violation or threatened violation of this Section 5,
and to exercise such remedies cumulatively or in conjunction
with any and all other rights and remedies provided by law or in
equity and under this Agreement. Employee hereby acknowledges
and agrees that the Company shall not be required to post bond
as a condition to obtaining or exercising any such remedies, and
Employee hereby waives any such requirement or condition and the
Employee agrees that he or she shall not plead adequacy of any
relief at law available to the Company or its successors or
assigns (as applicable) (including monetary damages) as a
defense to any petition, claim or motion for preliminary or
final injunctive relief to enforce any provision of this
Agreement. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the
Company may terminate the payment of any amount or benefits
payable to Employee under this Agreement in the event of a
breach of any of the covenants set forth in this Section 5.
(i) In the event that the Employee or the Company or its
successors or assigns (as applicable) should contest the
enforceability of any provision of this Agreement in any court
of competent jurisdiction, then any time period associated with
any such challenged provision shall be deemed suspended at the
time of filing the action in which such enforceability is
contested. In the event that the enforceability of any such
provision is upheld by such court of competent jurisdiction, all
periods of appeal having expired thereon, then the remaining
portion of any such time period shall automatically thereafter
once again become effective. For purposes of this Agreement, the
remaining portion of any such time period shall be the
difference between the full stated time period in this Agreement
relating to any such provision, less any time that Employee
complied with such provision prior to the filing of the
aforesaid action and less any time that Employee was restrained
by temporary restraining order, permanent injunction or similar
order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction from
violating any such provision during the pendency of such action
or proceeding.
(ii) The rights and remedies of Company hereunder are not
exclusive of or limited by any other rights or remedies that
Company may have, whether at law, in equity, by contract or
otherwise, all of which shall be cumulative (and not
alternative), and the exercise by a party of any one remedy will
not preclude the exercise of any other remedy. Without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, the rights and remedies of
Company hereunder, and the obligations and liabilities of
Employee hereunder, are in addition to their respective rights,
remedies, obligations and liabilities under the law of unfair
competition, misappropriation of trade secrets and the like.
This Agreement does not limit Employees obligations or the
rights of Company (or any affiliate of Company) under the terms
of any other agreement between Employee and Company or any
affiliate of Company.
(iii) If Company, any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities or their respective successors or assigns (as
applicable) successfully, in whole or part, asserts an action at
law or in equity to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement,
then Company, its Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or its
successors or assigns (as applicable), shall be entitled to
recover from Employee all reasonable attorneys fees,
costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other
relief to which it may be entitled. If Employee successfully, in
whole or part, asserts an action at law or in equity to enforce
any of the terms of this Agreement, then Employee shall be
entitled to recover from Company, any
K-6
of its Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or their respective
successors or assigns (as applicable) all reasonable
attorneys fees, costs, and necessary disbursements in
addition to any other relief to which Employee may be entitled.
6. Company Options. Employee
acknowledges and agrees that at the Effective Time, any and all
Company Options held by Employee as of the Effective Time will
automatically and without any action by Employee be terminated
in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Merger
Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary that may be
set forth in any plan, agreement or other instrument that
otherwise governs the terms of such Company Options.
7. Indemnification. The Articles
of Incorporation or the Operating Agreement of the Company, as
the case may be, shall provide for indemnification of the
Employee to the maximum extent permitted by law. The Company
shall maintain a Directors and Officers insurance
policy that is reasonably acceptable to the Parent, with such
amounts of coverage that is customary given the size and
business of the Company, and a premium that is commercially
reasonable, for so long as the Parent maintains such insurance
for the benefit of the officers of the Parent.
8. Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed
duly given (a) on the date of delivery if delivered
personally, or if by facsimile, upon written confirmation of
receipt by facsimile, (b) on the first (1st) Business Day
following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized courier under circumstances in which such courier
guarantees
next-day
delivery (except in the case of overseas delivery, in which case
notice shall be deemed duly given on the third (3rd) Business
Day following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized international courier under circumstances in which
such courier guarantees such delivery) or (c) on the
earlier of confirmed receipt or the fifth Business Day following
the date of mailing if delivered by registered or certified
mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid (except in the
case of overseas delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed
duly given on confirmed receipt if delivered by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid). All
notices hereunder shall be delivered to the addresses set forth
below, or pursuant to such other instructions as may be
designated in writing by the party to receive such notice:
(i) If to Parent, to:
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13,
85737, Ismaning Germany
Attention: Felix Marx
Facsimile: +49.89.9595.5170
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105
Attention: Michael L. Reed
Facsimile: 415.374.8459
(ii) If to the Company:
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
1900-B Carnegie Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Attention: Larry Midland
Facsimile: 949.250.7372
(iii) if to Employee, to the address of Employee set forth
on the signature page hereto.
9. Taxation. The Company may
withhold from any payments made to Employee under the Agreement
any and all federal, state, city, foreign or other applicable
taxes as shall be required pursuant to any applicable law,
governmental regulation or ruling.
K-7
10. Survival. Sections 1, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of this Agreement shall survive and remain
in full force and effect following any termination of this
Agreement or Employees employment with the Company.
11. Miscellaneous.
a. Entire Agreement. Except as
expressly set forth in Section 5(a), this Agreement,
together with the Proprietary Information Agreement, constitutes
the entire agreement, and supersede all prior written
agreements, arrangements, communications and understandings and
all prior and contemporaneous oral agreements, arrangements,
communications and understandings among the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof and thereof, including, for the
avoidance of doubt, the employment letter agreement between
Employee and the Company, dated January 3, 2008, which
shall terminate and be of no further force and effect at the
Effective Time.
b. Amendment; Waiver. This
Agreement may not be amended, modified or supplemented in any
manner, whether by course of conduct or otherwise, except by an
instrument in writing specifically designated as an amendment
hereto, signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto and
Parent. Any agreement on the part of a party to any waiver shall
be valid only if set forth in a written instrument executed and
delivered by such party. No failure or delay of any party in
exercising any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a
waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any
such right or power, or any abandonment or discontinuance of
steps to enforce such right or power, or any course of conduct,
preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise
of any other right or power.
c. Binding Effect; Assignment. The
rights and obligations of this Agreement shall bind and inure to
the benefit of any successor of the Company by reorganization,
merger or consolidation, or any assignee of all or substantially
all of the Companys business and properties. The Company
may assign its rights and delegate its obligations hereunder to
any of its affiliates without the consent of Employee,
provided that Company remains ultimately liable for all
of Companys obligations hereunder. Employees rights
or obligations under this Agreement may not be assigned by
Employee.
d. Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
and public policy (other than conflict of laws principles) of
the State of California applicable to contracts executed and to
be wholly performed within such state.
e. Dispute Resolution And Binding
Arbitration. Employee and the Company agree
that in the event a dispute arises concerning or relating to
this Agreement, or to Employees employment with the
Company, or any termination therefrom, all such disputes shall
be submitted to binding arbitration before an arbitrator
experienced in employment law. Said arbitration will be
conducted in accordance with the rules applicable to employment
disputes of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services
(JAMS). The Company will be responsible for
paying any filing fees and costs of the arbitration proceeding
itself (for example, arbitrators fees, conference room,
transcripts), but each party shall be responsible for its own
attorneys fees. The Company and Employee agree that this
promise to arbitrate covers any disputes that the Company may
have against Employee, or that Employee may have against the
Company and all of its affiliated entities and their directors,
officers and Employees, arising out of or relating to this
Agreement, the employment relationship or termination of
employment, including any claims concerning the validity,
interpretation, effect or violation of this Agreement; violation
of any federal, state, or local law; any tort; and any other
aspect of Employees compensation or employment. The
Company and Employee further agree that arbitration as provided
in this Section 10(e) shall be the exclusive and binding
remedy for any such dispute and will be used instead of any
court action, which is hereby expressly waived, except for any
request by either party hereto for temporary or preliminary
injunctive relief pending arbitration in accordance with
applicable law, or an administrative claim with an
administrative agency. The Federal Arbitration Act shall govern
the interpretation and enforcement of such arbitration
proceeding. The arbitrator shall apply the substantive law (and
the law of remedies, if applicable) of the State of California,
or federal law, if California law is preempted. The arbitration
shall be conducted in Los Angeles, California, unless otherwise
mutually agreed.
THE COMPANY AND EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT BY
AGREEING TO ARBITRATE, THEY ARE WAIVING ANY RIGHT TO BRING AN
ACTION AGAINST THE OTHER IN A COURT OF LAW, EITHER STATE OR
FEDERAL, AND ARE WAIVING THE RIGHT TO HAVE CLAIMS AND DAMAGES,
IF ANY, DETERMINED BY A JURY.
K-8
f. Severability. Whenever
possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this
Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective
and valid under applicable law. Any provision of this Agreement
which is deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any
jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction and subject to this
paragraph, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability, without affecting in any way the
remaining provisions hereof in such jurisdiction or rendering
that any other provisions of this Agreement invalid, illegal or
unenforceable in any other jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if any provision of this Agreement should be deemed
invalid, illegal or unenforceable because its scope or duration
is considered excessive, such provision shall be modified so
that the scope of the provision is reduced only to the minimum
extent necessary to render the modified provision valid, legal
and enforceable.
g. Employee
Acknowledgment. Employee acknowledges that he
has had the opportunity to consult legal counsel in regard to
this Agreement, that he has read and understands this Agreement,
that he is fully aware of its legal effect, and that he has
entered into it freely and voluntarily and based on his own
judgment and not on any representations, warranties or promises
other than those contained in this Agreement.
h. Further Assurances. Each of the
parties agrees to execute, acknowledge, deliver and perform, and
cause to be executed, acknowledged, delivered and performed, at
any time and from time to time, as the case may be, all such
further acts, deeds, assignments, transfers, conveyances, powers
of attorney and assurances as may be reasonably necessary to
carry out the provisions or intent of this Agreement.
i. Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall
be considered one and the same instrument and shall become
effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each
of the parties and delivered to the other party. This Agreement
may be executed by facsimile signature and a facsimile signature
shall constitute an original for all purposes.
[Signature
page follows]
K-9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this
Agreement, or caused this Agreement to be duly executed, as of
the day and year first above written.
HIRSCH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Name: Larry Midland
EMPLOYEE
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
P. Beliles, Jr.
|
Robert P. Beliles, Jr.
Address: 29 Cherry Hills Dr.
Coto de Caza, CA 92679
[Signature
page to Beliles Employment Agreement]
K-10
Annex L
EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT
This Employment Agreement (this Agreement) is
dated as of December 10, 2008, by and between Hirsch
Electronics Corporation, a California corporation (the
Company), SCM Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (Parent) and Mr. Larry
Midland (the Employee).
WHEREAS, Parent, the Company and certain other parties thereto
have entered into that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of December 10, 2008 (the Merger
Agreement), pursuant to which, among other things,
through a two-step merger the Company will become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Parent and be transformed into a new Delaware
limited liability company (together as used herein, the
Merger).
WHEREAS, as an inducement for and a condition to Parent agreeing
to enter into the Merger Agreement and in consideration of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, concurrently
with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Employee and the
Company have agreed to enter into this Agreement which will set
forth the terms of Employees employment by the Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
promises, representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the Company and Employee agree as follows:
1. Effective Date. This Agreement
shall automatically and immediately become effective at, and not
before, the Effective Time, as such term is defined in the
Merger Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, this Agreement
shall not become effective, shall have no force or effect, and
shall be null and void.
2. Employment; Employment Period; Position;
Duties.
a. The Company hereby agrees to employ Employee, and
Employee hereby accepts such employment with the Company, in
each case, on the terms and subject to the conditions
hereinafter set forth. Subject to any earlier termination of
Employees employment as provided herein, Employees
employment hereunder shall be for an initial term commencing at
the Effective Time and ending on the third (3rd) anniversary of
the Effective Time (the Employment Period).
Beginning on the third (3rd) anniversary and continuing on each
anniversary thereafter, the employment agreement shall
automatically extend for a period of one (1) year, subject
to any termination of Employees employment as provided
herein.
b. Employee shall serve as the Companys President as
well as Executive Vice President at the Parent, being part of
the Executive Management Team of the Parent, and shall report
directly to the Parents CEO (the Reporting
Officer). Employee shall also serve in such other
capacities as may be requested from time to time by the
Reporting Officer
and/or the
Board of Directors of the Parent (the Board)
or a duly authorized committee thereof. Employee shall perform
such duties as are customarily associated with his position and
as reasonably required by the Reporting Officer. Employee shall
also render such other services for the Parent or the Company
and each of its subsidiaries and affiliated entities as the
Parent or the Company may from time to time request that are
generally commensurate with such Employees titles.
Employee agrees to serve the Parent and the Company faithfully
and perform such duties and services using his best efforts and
abilities. Employee agrees to devote his full-time attention and
energies exclusively to the business of the Parent and the
Company and the performance of his duties and services, and to
act at all times in the best interests of the Parent and the
Company. Employee agrees to conduct himself at all times in a
business-like and professional manner as appropriate for a
person in Employees position and to represent the Parent
and the Company in all respects in a manner that comports with
sound business judgment in the highest ethical standards.
Employee will be subject to and abide by the policies and
procedures of the Parent and the Company, as adopted and revised
by the Parent or the Company, as the case may be, from time to
time. Employee shall be subject to the direction of the Parent
and the Company, who shall retain full control over the means
and methods by which Employee performs his duties and the above
services and of the place(s) at which all such duties and
services are rendered. Employees principal place of
employment shall be at the Companys offices in Santa Ana,
California.
L-1
3. Compensation; Benefits.
a. Base Salary. As compensation
for services rendered to the Parent and the Company, Employee
shall be entitled to a base salary at the annual rate of
$250,000 (two hundred and fifty thousand dollars), payable by
the Company in accordance with the regular payroll practices of
the Company for its employees. Employee shall be eligible to
such merit increases in Employees base salary, if any, as
may be determined from time to time in the sole discretion of
the Board. Employees annual base salary rate, as in effect
from time to time, is hereinafter referred to as the
Base Salary.
b. Bonus. Employee shall be
eligible to receive an annual target based variable bonus, of up
to 80% of the Employees annual base salary, based upon the
achievement of personal performance targets established by the
Parents Board of Directors in consultation with Employee,
and the overall success of the Company. Any bonus would be
subject to the terms and conditions of the Parents MBO
Bonus Program, as the same may be amended from time to time, and
the Employees continuing employment. The achievement of
the performance and other target would be determined and any
resulting bonus would be payable on a quarterly basis (up to a
maximum bonus of 10% of the Employees annual base salary
per quarter as well as up to a maximum of 40% at year end). A
copy of the Parents MBO Bonus Program as currently in
effect is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
c. Stock Options. Upon the
Effective Time, the Employee shall be eligible to participate in
Parents Stock Option Plan. It is anticipated that the
Employee will receive a one-time grant of a non-qualified stock
option to purchase 40,000 (forty thousand) shares of the
Parents common stock, subject to the terms and conditions
of the Parents Stock Option Plan. Any such grant is
subject to approval by the Parents Board of Directors. A
copy of the Parents Stock Option Plan as currently in
effect is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
d. Other Employee
Benefits. Employee shall be eligible to
receive or participate in any incentive, retirement, vacation,
sick or family leave, reimbursement for travel and entertainment
expenses, health and insurance or other benefits of the Company,
as in effect from time to time, on the same basis as other
employees of the Company occupying positions with responsibility
and salary comparable to that of Employee, but in any event not
materially inferior to the benefits the Employee enjoyed as an
employee of the Company prior to the Merger. The Company may at
any time and from time to time change, amend, modify or
completely eliminate any such plans, programs and benefits
available to its employees and Employees participation in
any such plans, programs and benefits shall not affect such
right of the Company; Employee agrees and acknowledges that he
shall have no vested rights under or to participate in any such
plans, programs and benefits except as expressly provided under
the terms thereof.
4. Termination of
Employment. Employees employment with
the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities
may be terminated by Company at any time and for any or no
reason. Employee will be required to give the Company three
(3) months advance written notice of any resignation of
Employees employment. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Agreement, the provisions of this Section 4 shall
exclusively govern Employees rights upon termination of
employment with the Company and any of its subsidiaries or
affiliates entities for Cause, death or Disability or any other
reason.
a. By the Company For Cause; Resignation by
Employee. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Company for Cause at any time. For purposes of
this Agreement, Cause shall mean:
(i) unsatisfactory performance in any material respect of
Employees duties, services or responsibilities (as
generally described in this Agreement) as reasonably determined
by the Board, provided that the Company has given
Employee written notice specifying the unsatisfactory
performance of his duties and responsibilities and a reasonable
opportunity to cure, and Executive has failed to cure such
deficiencies; (ii) a material breach by Employee of any of
his obligations hereunder which remains uncured after the lapse
of thirty (30) days following the date that the Company has
given Employee written notice thereof; (iii) a breach by
Employee of his duty not to engage in any transaction that
represents, directly or indirectly, self-dealing with the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities which
has not been approved by a majority of the disinterested
directors of the Board or of the terms of his employment;
(iv) any act of intentional dishonesty, willful misconduct,
embezzlement, intentional fraud or similar conduct involving the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities;
(v) the conviction or the plea of nolo contendere or
the equivalent in respect of a felony involving moral turpitude;
or (vi) intentional, malicious infliction of any damage of
a material nature to any property of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities. If Employees
employment is terminated by the Company for Cause or by Employee
for any reason, Employee shall
L-2
be entitled to receive following the date of such termination:
(A) the Base Salary through the date of termination;
(B) reimbursement for any unreimbursed business expenses
properly incurred by Employee in accordance with Company policy
prior to the date of Employees termination; and
(C) any earned but unpaid benefits, if any, through the
date of termination in accordance with the applicable employee
benefit plan of the Company (the amounts described in
clauses (A) through (C) of this Section 4(a),
reduced by any amounts owed by Employee to the Company, being
referred to as the Accrued Rights). In
addition, except as may otherwise be expressly provided in any
plan, agreement or other instrument that governs the terms of
any stock option or other incentive compensation, all unvested
stock options and other incentive compensation shall immediately
be cancelled and forfeited. Following such termination of
Employees employment by the Company for Cause or by
Employee for any reason, except as set forth in this
Section 4(a), Employee shall have no further rights to any
compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
b. Disability or
Death. Employees employment shall
terminate upon Employees death and may be terminated by
the Company if Employee becomes (in the good faith judgment of
the Board) physically or mentally incapacitated and is therefore
unable for a period of three (3) consecutive months or for
an aggregate of six (6) months in any twelve
(12) consecutive month period to perform Employees
duties (such incapacity is hereinafter referred to as
Disability). Upon termination of
Employees employment hereunder by reason of his Disability
or death, Employee or Employees estate (as the case may
be) shall be entitled to receive the Accrued Rights following
the date of such termination. Employees rights with
respect to any stock option or other incentive compensation
shall be determined by the terms of any plan, agreement or other
instrument that governs the terms of any such stock options or
other incentive compensation. Following Employees
termination of employment due to death or Disability, except as
set forth in this Section 4(b), Employee shall have no
further rights to any compensation or benefits from the Company
or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this
Agreement or otherwise.
c. By the Company Without
Cause. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Company at any time without Cause. If
Employees employment is terminated by the Company without
Cause (other than by reason of death or Disability), Employee
shall be entitled to receive: (i) the Accrued Rights
following the date of such termination; and (ii) subject to
Employees execution (within thirty (30) days
following the date of termination) and non-revocation of a
release of claims in favor of the Company in a form provided by
the Company (which release excludes from its scope claims under
any continuing right under any benefit or stock option plan or
agreement), a payment equal to the amount of Employees
then current Base Salary that would have been payable over a six
(6) month period following the date of such termination,
payable monthly in accordance with the Companys normal
payment schedule and practices beginning on the next regular
payroll distribution after the date that the release of claims
becomes irrevocable, and all previously granted unvested options
shall cease vesting upon the date of such termination. Following
Employees termination of employment by the Company without
Cause (other than by reason of Employees death or
Disability), except as set forth in this Section 4(c),
Employee shall have no further rights to any compensation or
benefits from the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities under this Agreement or otherwise.
d. By the Employee For Good
Reason. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Employee for Good Reason (as hereinafter
defined). For purposes of this Agreement, Good
Reason shall mean the occurrence of any of the following
without the Employees prior written consent: (i) a
material reduction of Employees duties, position, job
titles, or responsibilities; (ii) a reduction of
Employees base salary or total compensation package;
(iii) Employee being forced to relocate; or (iv) the
Company requires Employee to perform illegal or fraudulent acts.
However, none of the foregoing events or conditions shall
constitute Good Reason unless: (x) the Employee delivers to
the Parent a written notice identifying in reasonable detail the
act or acts constituting Good Reason and his
intention to so terminate his employment (a Notice of
Good Reason), within fifteen (15) days following
the Employees knowledge of the circumstances constituting
Good Reason; (y) the Parent or the Company, as
the case may be, does not reverse or otherwise cure the event or
condition within fifteen (15) days after the date that the
Notice of Good Reason is delivered; and (z) the Employee
resigns his employment no earlier than five (5) and no
later than fifteen (15) days following the expiration of
that cure period. If the Employee terminates his employment for
Good Reason(other than by reason of death or Disability),
Employee shall be entitled to receive: (i) the Accrued
Rights following the date of such termination; and
(ii) subject to Employees execution (within thirty
(30) days
L-3
following the date of termination) and non-revocation of a
release of claims in favor of the Company in a form provided by
the Company (which release excludes from its scope claims under
any continuing right under any benefit or stock option plan or
agreement), a payment equal to the amount of Employees
then current Base Salary that would have been payable over a
three (3) month period following the date of such
termination, payable monthly in accordance with the
Companys normal payment schedule and practices beginning
on the next regular payroll distribution after the date that the
release of claims becomes irrevocable, and all previously
granted unvested options shall cease vesting upon the date of
such termination. Following Employees termination of
employment by the Employee for Good Reason(other than by reason
of death or Disability), except as set forth in this
Section 4(d), Employee shall have no further rights to any
compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
e. Company Property. Upon any
termination of Employees employment with the Company or
any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or earlier upon
request, Employee shall promptly return to the Company all
property of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated
entities in Employees possession and deliver to the
Company all copies of all correspondence, documents, data and
other materials belonging to or containing proprietary
information of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities.
f. Section 409A Provisions.
(i) A termination of employment shall not be deemed to have
occurred for purposes of any provision of this Agreement
providing for the payment of any amounts or benefits upon or
following a termination of employment unless such termination is
also a separation from service within the meaning of
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code) and, for purposes of any
such provision of this Agreement, references to a
termination, termination of employment
or like terms shall mean separation from service. If
Employee is deemed on the date of termination to be a
specified employee within the meaning of that term
under Section 409A(a)(2)(B) of the Code, then with regard
to any payment or the provision of any benefit that is
considered deferred compensation under Section 409A of the
Code payable on account of a separation from
service, such payment or benefit shall be made or provided
at the date which is the earlier of (A) the expiration of
the six (6)-month period measured from the date of such
separation from service of Employee, and
(B) the date of Employees death (the Delay
Period). Upon the expiration of the Delay Period, all
payments and benefits delayed pursuant to this paragraph
(whether they would have otherwise been payable in a single sum
or in installments in the absence of such delay) shall be paid
or reimbursed to Employee in a lump sum as soon as
administratively practicable, and any remaining payments and
benefits due under this Agreement shall be paid or provided in
accordance with the normal payment dates specified for them
herein.
(ii) With regard to any provision herein that provides for
reimbursement of costs and expenses or in-kind benefits, except
as permitted by Section 409A of the Code, (A) the
right to reimbursement or in-kind benefits shall not be subject
to liquidation or exchange for another benefit, (B) the
amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind
benefits, provided during any taxable year shall not affect the
expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind benefits to be
provided, in any other taxable year, provided that the
foregoing clause (B) shall not be violated without regard
to expenses reimbursed under any arrangement covered by
Section 105(b) of the Code solely because such expenses are
subject to a limit related to the period the arrangement is in
effect and (C) such payments shall be made on or before the
last day of Employees taxable year following the taxable
year in which the expense occurred.
5. Restrictive Covenants.
a. Confidentiality. Employee
acknowledges that Employee has signed and agrees to be bound by
all of the terms and conditions of that certain Non-Disclosure
Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement (the
Proprietary Information Agreement),
attached as Exhibit C to this Agreement, which
agreement shall remain in full force and effect at all times
during and after the Employment Period, and the terms of which
shall apply with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries and
affiliated entities. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained herein or in the Proprietary Information Agreement,
neither this Agreement or the Proprietary Information Agreement
shall affect any of Employees pre-existing obligations
under any non-disclosure, non-competition or proprietary
information and inventions agreement or similar agreement
between Employee and the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities.
L-4
b. Agreement Not to
Compete/Non-Solicitation. Employee agrees
that during the Employment Period, Employee shall not, directly
or indirectly:
(i) acquire or hold any interest in, manage, operate, join,
control, or engage or participate in any capacity in the
financing, ownership, management, operation or control of, be or
become an officer, director, stockholder, owner, co-owner,
partner, trustee, consultant, or advisor to, contract or permit
Employees name or likeness to be used by, or be employed
by, render or perform services for or connected in any manner
with, any third party, firm, company, entity, person, business
or other enterprise which is engaged in any line of business in
which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities or any of their respective successors or assigns is
engaged or proposes to be engaged during the Employment Period;
provided, however, that such restriction shall not
apply to any ownership as a passive investment of less than 1%
of the outstanding shares of the capital stock of a
publicly-held corporation if (A) such shares are actively
traded on the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Global
Market or similar market or exchange and (B) Employee is
not otherwise associated directly or indirectly with such
corporation or any affiliate of such corporation;
(ii) encourage, induce, recruit, hire, solicit or attempt
to solicit or induce, or take any other action which is intended
to induce or encourage, or has the effect of inducing or
encouraging, any person who is a full-time, part-time or
temporary employee or contractor of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities or who was an employee or
contractor of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities at any time during prior six-month period,
or encourage or otherwise cause any such employee or contractor
to terminate or alter his or her employment or other
relationship, whether such employment is pursuant to a written
agreement, for a predetermined period, or is at-will, with the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or to
accept employment with or perform services for any third party,
firm, company, entity, person, business or other
enterprise; or
(iii) interfere or attempt to interfere with existing
relationships that may exist between the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or any of their respective
successors or assigns, and any of their respective customers,
suppliers, consultants, clients, licensees, licensors, landlords
or other business relations, or approach, contact, solicit,
induce, request, advise, recruit or otherwise encourage any
existing or prospective customers, suppliers, consultants,
clients, licensees, licensors, landlords, strategic partners or
vendors, or other business relations of the Company or any of
its subsidiaries or affiliated entities to cease doing business
or withdraw, curtail or cancel or otherwise alter their business
dealings or relationship with the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities (including by making any
negative or disparaging statements or communications about the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities),
including on behalf of or to move such business or relationship
to, any third party, firm, company, entity, person, business or
other enterprise; provided, however, that
notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of this Agreement,
the placement of general advertisements which may be targeted to
a particular geographic or technical area but which are not
targeted directly or indirectly towards employees of the Company
or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any of
their respective successors or assigns is engaged shall not be
deemed to be a solicitation under this Agreement.
(iv) Exceptions to this clause can only be approved by
prior written approval of the Parents Board of
Directors
c. During the Employment Period and following any
termination of this Agreement, Employee agrees not to make any
public statements (whether written or oral and whether to the
media, any third party or otherwise), that are detrimental,
prejudicial, disparaging, libelous, slanderous or damaging to,
or would otherwise reflect negatively on the reputation of, the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any
of their respective members, officers, employees,
representatives, counsel, affiliates, successors, assigns,
products or businesses. Employee further agrees that he will not
act in any manner that might interfere with the business or
disparage the reputation of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any of their respective
members, officers, employees, representatives, counsel or
affiliates. Nothing set forth in this Section 5(c)
shall prohibit or limit in any way Employees right to
accurately and honestly respond as required or to cooperate with
any valid government, court or regulatory order or request.
L-5
d. Remedies. Employee acknowledges
that in the event of breach or threatened breach by Employee of
any of the terms of this Section 5, the Company and its
subsidiaries and affiliated entities would suffer significant
and irreparable harm that can not be satisfactorily compensated
in monetary terms, and that the remedies at law available to the
Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated entities will
otherwise be inadequate and, therefore, the Company and its
subsidiaries and affiliated entities shall be entitled,
notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10(e), to
specific performance of this Agreement by Employee, including
the immediate ex parte issuance of a temporary,
preliminary and final injunction enjoining Employee from any
such violation or threatened violation of this Section 5,
and to exercise such remedies cumulatively or in conjunction
with any and all other rights and remedies provided by law or in
equity and under this Agreement. Employee hereby acknowledges
and agrees that the Company shall not be required to post bond
as a condition to obtaining or exercising any such remedies, and
Employee hereby waives any such requirement or condition and the
Employee agrees that he or she shall not plead adequacy of any
relief at law available to the Company or its successors or
assigns (as applicable) (including monetary damages) as a
defense to any petition, claim or motion for preliminary or
final injunctive relief to enforce any provision of this
Agreement. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the
Company may terminate the payment of any amount or benefits
payable to Employee under this Agreement in the event of a
breach of any of the covenants set forth in this Section 5.
(i) In the event that the Employee or the Company or its
successors or assigns (as applicable) should contest the
enforceability of any provision of this Agreement in any court
of competent jurisdiction, then any time period associated with
any such challenged provision shall be deemed suspended at the
time of filing the action in which such enforceability is
contested. In the event that the enforceability of any such
provision is upheld by such court of competent jurisdiction, all
periods of appeal having expired thereon, then the remaining
portion of any such time period shall automatically thereafter
once again become effective. For purposes of this Agreement, the
remaining portion of any such time period shall be the
difference between the full stated time period in this Agreement
relating to any such provision, less any time that Employee
complied with such provision prior to the filing of the
aforesaid action and less any time that Employee was restrained
by temporary restraining order, permanent injunction or similar
order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction from
violating any such provision during the pendency of such action
or proceeding.
(ii) The rights and remedies of Company hereunder are not
exclusive of or limited by any other rights or remedies that
Company may have, whether at law, in equity, by contract or
otherwise, all of which shall be cumulative (and not
alternative), and the exercise by a party of any one remedy will
not preclude the exercise of any other remedy. Without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, the rights and remedies of
Company hereunder, and the obligations and liabilities of
Employee hereunder, are in addition to their respective rights,
remedies, obligations and liabilities under the law of unfair
competition, misappropriation of trade secrets and the like.
This Agreement does not limit Employees obligations or the
rights of Company (or any affiliate of Company) under the terms
of any other agreement between Employee and Company or any
affiliate of Company.
(iii) If Company, any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities or their respective successors or assigns (as
applicable) successfully, in whole or part, asserts an action at
law or in equity to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement,
then Company, its Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or its
successors or assigns (as applicable), shall be entitled to
recover from Employee all reasonable attorneys fees,
costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other
relief to which it may be entitled. If Employee, his heirs or
assigns, successfully, in whole or part, assert an action at law
or in equity to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement, then
Employee, his heirs or assigns shall be entitled to recover from
Company, any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or their
respective successors or assigns (as applicable) all reasonable
attorneys fees, costs, and necessary disbursements in
addition to any other relief to which Employee may be entitled.
6. Company Options. Employee
acknowledges and agrees that at the Effective Time, any and all
Company Options held by Employee as of the Effective Time will
automatically and without any action by Employee be terminated
in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Merger
Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary that may be
set forth in any plan, agreement or other instrument that
otherwise governs the terms of such Company Options.
L-6
7. Indemnification. The Articles
of Incorporation or the Operating Agreement of the Company, as
the case may be, shall provide for indemnification of the
Employee to the maximum extent permitted by law. The Company
shall maintain a Directors and Officers insurance
policy that is reasonably acceptable to the Parent, with such
amounts of coverage that is customary given the size and
business of the Company, and a premium that is commercially
reasonable, for so long as the Parent maintains such insurance
for the benefit of the officers of the Parent.
8. Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed
duly given (a) on the date of delivery if delivered
personally, or if by facsimile, upon written confirmation of
receipt by facsimile, (b) on the first (1st) Business Day
following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized courier under circumstances in which such courier
guarantees
next-day
delivery (except in the case of overseas delivery, in which case
notice shall be deemed duly given on the third (3rd) Business
Day following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized international courier under circumstances in which
such courier guarantees such delivery) or (c) on the
earlier of confirmed receipt or the fifth Business Day following
the date of mailing if delivered by registered or certified
mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid (except in the
case of overseas delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed
duly given on confirmed receipt if delivered by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid). All
notices hereunder shall be delivered to the addresses set forth
below, or pursuant to such other instructions as may be
designated in writing by the party to receive such notice:
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13,
85737, Ismaning Germany
Attention: Felix Marx
Facsimile: +49.89.9595.5170
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105
Attention: Michael L. Reed
Facsimile: 415.374.8459
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
1900-B Carnegie Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Attention: Secretary
Facsimile: 949.250.7372
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
if to Employee, to the address of Employee set forth on the
signature page hereto.
|
9. Taxation. The Company may
withhold from any payments made to Employee under the Agreement
any and all federal, state, city, foreign or other applicable
taxes as shall be required pursuant to any applicable law,
governmental regulation or ruling.
10. Survival. Sections 1, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of this Agreement shall survive and remain
in full force and effect following any termination of this
Agreement or Employees employment with the Company.
11. Miscellaneous.
a. Entire Agreement. Except as
expressly set forth in Section 5(a), this Agreement,
together with the Proprietary Information Agreement, constitutes
the entire agreement, and supersede all prior written
agreements, arrangements, communications and understandings and
all prior and contemporaneous oral agreements, arrangements,
communications and understandings among the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof and thereof.
L-7
b. Amendment; Waiver. This
Agreement may not be amended, modified or supplemented in any
manner, whether by course of conduct or otherwise, except by an
instrument in writing specifically designated as an amendment
hereto, signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto and
Parent. Any agreement on the part of a party to any waiver shall
be valid only if set forth in a written instrument executed and
delivered by such party. No failure or delay of any party in
exercising any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a
waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any
such right or power, or any abandonment or discontinuance of
steps to enforce such right or power, or any course of conduct,
preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise
of any other right or power.
c. Binding Effect; Assignment. The
rights and obligations of this Agreement shall bind and inure to
the benefit of any successor of the Company by reorganization,
merger or consolidation, or any assignee of all or substantially
all of the Companys business and properties. The Company
may assign its rights and delegate its obligations hereunder to
any of its affiliates without the consent of Employee,
provided that Company remains ultimately liable for all
of Companys obligations hereunder. Employees rights
or obligations under this Agreement may not be assigned by
Employee.
d. Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
and public policy (other than conflict of laws principles) of
the State of California applicable to contracts executed and to
be wholly performed within such state.
e. Dispute Resolution And Binding
Arbitration. Employee and the Company agree
that in the event a dispute arises concerning or relating to
this Agreement, or to Employees employment with the
Company, or any termination therefrom, all such disputes shall
be submitted to binding arbitration before an arbitrator
experienced in employment law. Said arbitration will be
conducted in accordance with the rules applicable to employment
disputes of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services
(JAMS). The Company will be responsible for
paying any filing fees and costs of the arbitration proceeding
itself (for example, arbitrators fees, conference room,
transcripts), but each party shall be responsible for its own
attorneys fees. The Company and Employee agree that this
promise to arbitrate covers any disputes that the Company may
have against Employee, or that Employee may have against the
Company and all of its affiliated entities and their directors,
officers and Employees, arising out of or relating to this
Agreement, the employment relationship or termination of
employment, including any claims concerning the validity,
interpretation, effect or violation of this Agreement; violation
of any federal, state, or local law; any tort; and any other
aspect of Employees compensation or employment. The
Company and Employee further agree that arbitration as provided
in this Section 11(e) shall be the exclusive and binding
remedy for any such dispute and will be used instead of any
court action, which is hereby expressly waived, except for any
request by either party hereto for temporary or preliminary
injunctive relief pending arbitration in accordance with
applicable law, or an administrative claim with an
administrative agency. The Federal Arbitration Act shall govern
the interpretation and enforcement of such arbitration
proceeding. The arbitrator shall apply the substantive law (and
the law of remedies, if applicable) of the State of California,
or federal law, if California law is preempted. The arbitration
shall be conducted in Los Angeles, California, unless otherwise
mutually agreed.
THE
COMPANY AND EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT BY AGREEING TO
ARBITRATE, THEY ARE WAIVING ANY RIGHT TO BRING AN ACTION AGAINST
THE OTHER IN A COURT OF LAW, EITHER STATE OR FEDERAL, AND ARE
WAIVING THE RIGHT TO HAVE CLAIMS AND DAMAGES, IF ANY, DETERMINED
BY A JURY.
f. Severability. Whenever
possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this
Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective
and valid under applicable law. Any provision of this Agreement
which is deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any
jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction and subject to this
paragraph, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability, without affecting in any way the
remaining provisions hereof in such jurisdiction or rendering
that any other provisions of this Agreement invalid, illegal or
unenforceable in any other jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if any provision of this Agreement should be deemed
invalid, illegal or unenforceable because its scope or duration
is considered excessive, such provision shall be modified so
that the scope of the provision is reduced only to the minimum
extent necessary to render the modified provision valid, legal
and enforceable.
L-8
g. Employee
Acknowledgment. Employee acknowledges that he
has had the opportunity to consult legal counsel in regard to
this Agreement, that he has read and understands this Agreement,
that he is fully aware of its legal effect, and that he has
entered into it freely and voluntarily and based on his own
judgment and not on any representations, warranties or promises
other than those contained in this Agreement.
h. Further Assurances. Each of the
parties agrees to execute, acknowledge, deliver and perform, and
cause to be executed, acknowledged, delivered and performed, at
any time and from time to time, as the case may be, all such
further acts, deeds, assignments, transfers, conveyances, powers
of attorney and assurances as may be reasonably necessary to
carry out the provisions or intent of this Agreement.
i. Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall
be considered one and the same instrument and shall become
effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each
of the parties and delivered to the other party. This Agreement
may be executed by facsimile signature and a facsimile signature
shall constitute an original for all purposes.
[Signature
page follows]
L-9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this
Agreement, or caused this Agreement to be duly executed, as of
the day and year first above written.
SCM MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
Felix Marx
CEO & Director
EMPLOYEE
Larry Midland
Address:
1805 Jamaica Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
[Signature
Page to Midland Employment Agreement]
L-10
Annex M
EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT
This Employment Agreement (this Agreement) is
dated as of December 10, 2008, by and between Hirsch
Electronics Corporation, a California corporation (the
Company), and Mr. John Piccininni (the
Employee).
WHEREAS, SCM Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(Parent), the Company and certain other
parties thereto have entered into that certain Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated as of December 10, 2008 (the
Merger Agreement), pursuant to which, among
other things, through a two-step merger the Company will become
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent and be transformed into a
new Delaware limited liability company (together as used herein,
the Merger).
WHEREAS, as an inducement for and a condition to Parent agreeing
to enter into the Merger Agreement and in consideration of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, concurrently
with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Employee and the
Company have agreed to enter into this Agreement which will set
forth the terms of Employees employment by the Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
promises, representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the Company and Employee agree as follows:
1. Effective Date. This Agreement
shall automatically and immediately become effective at, and not
before, the Effective Time, as such term is defined in the
Merger Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, this Agreement
shall not become effective, shall have no force or effect, and
shall be null and void.
2. Employment; Employment Period; Position;
Duties.
a. The Company hereby agrees to employ Employee, and
Employee hereby accepts such employment with the Company, in
each case, on the terms and subject to the conditions
hereinafter set forth. Subject to any earlier termination of
Employees employment as provided herein, Employees
employment hereunder shall be for an initial term commencing at
the Effective Time and ending on the third (3rd) anniversary of
the Effective Time (the Employment Period).
Beginning on the third (3rd) anniversary and continuing on each
anniversary thereafter, the employment agreement shall
automatically extend for a period of one (1) year, subject
to any termination of Employees employment as provided
herein.
b. Employee shall serve as the Companys Vice
President of Sales, and shall report directly to Larry Midland
(the Reporting Officer). Employee shall also
serve in such other capacities as may be requested from time to
time by the Reporting Officer, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company
and/or the
Board of Directors of the Company or the sole member of the
Company, as the case may be (the
Board/Member) or a duly authorized committee
thereof. Employee shall perform such duties as are customarily
associated with his position and as reasonably required by the
Reporting Officer. Employee shall also render such other
services for the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities as the Company may from time to time request that are
generally commensurate with such Employees title. Employee
agrees to serve the Company faithfully and perform such duties
and services using his best efforts and abilities. Employee
agrees to devote his full-time attention and energies
exclusively to the business of the Company and the performance
of his duties and services, and to act at all times in the best
interests of the Company. Employee agrees to conduct himself at
all times in a business-like and professional manner as
appropriate for a person in Employees position and to
represent the Company in all respects in a manner that comports
with sound business judgment in the highest ethical standards.
Employee will be subject to and abide by the policies and
procedures of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated
companies, as adopted and revised by the Company or any of its
subsidiaries and affiliated companies from time to time.
Employee shall be subject to the direction of the Company, which
shall retain full control over the means and methods by which
Employee performs his duties and the above services and of the
place(s) at which all such duties and services are rendered.
Employees principal place of employment shall be at the
Companys offices in Santa Ana, California.
M-1
3. Compensation; Benefits.
a. Base Salary. As compensation
for services rendered to the Company, Employee shall be entitled
to a base salary at the annual rate of $144,000 (one hundred and
forty-four thousand dollars), payable in accordance with the
regular payroll practices of the Company for its employees.
Employee shall be eligible to such merit increases in
Employees base salary, if any, as may be determined from
time to time in the sole discretion of the Board/Member.
Employees annual base salary rate, as in effect from time
to time, is hereinafter referred to as the Base
Salary.
b. Bonus. Employee shall be
eligible to receive an annual target based variable bonus, of up
to 40% of the Employees annual base salary (subject to
increase upon achievement of sales targets as identified in the
Parents MBO Bonus Program), based upon the achievement of
personal performance targets established by the Parents
Board of Directors in consultation with Employee, and the
overall success of the Company. Any bonus would be subject to
the terms and conditions of the Parents MBO Bonus Program,
as the same may be amended from time to time, and the
Employees continuing employment. The achievement of the
performance and other target would be determined and any
resulting bonus would be payable on a quarterly basis (up to a
maximum bonus of 10% of the Employees annual base salary
per quarter). A copy of the Parents MBO Bonus Program as
currently in effect is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
c. Stock Options. Upon the
Effective Time, the Employee shall be eligible to participate in
Parents Stock Option Plan. It is anticipated that the
Employee will receive a one-time grant of a non-qualified stock
option to purchase 25,000 (twenty-five thousand) shares of the
Parents common stock, subject to the terms and conditions
of the Parents Stock Option Plan. Any such grant is
subject to approval by the Parents Board of Directors. A
copy of the Parents Stock Option Plan as currently in
effect is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
d. Other Employee
Benefits. Employee shall be eligible to
receive or participate in any incentive, retirement, vacation,
sick or family leave, reimbursement for travel and entertainment
expenses, health and insurance or other benefits of the Company,
as in effect from time to time, on the same basis as other
employees of the Company occupying positions with responsibility
and salary comparable to that of Employee, but in any event not
materially inferior to the benefits the Employee enjoyed as an
employee of the Company prior to the Merger. The Company may at
any time and from time to time change, amend, modify or
completely eliminate any such plans, programs and benefits
available to its employees and Employees participation in
any such plans, programs and benefits shall not affect such
right of the Company; Employee agrees and acknowledges that he
shall have no vested rights under or to participate in any such
plans, programs and benefits except as expressly provided under
the terms thereof.
4. Termination of
Employment. Employees employment with
the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities
may be terminated by Company at any time and for any or no
reason. Employee will be required to give the Company three
(3) months advance written notice of any resignation of
Employees employment. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Agreement, the provisions of this Section 4 shall
exclusively govern Employees rights upon termination of
employment with the Company and any of its subsidiaries or
affiliates entities for Cause, death or Disability or any other
reason.
a. By the Company For Cause; Resignation by
Employee. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Company for Cause at any time. For purposes of
this Agreement, Cause shall mean:
(i) unsatisfactory performance in any material respect of
Employees duties, services or responsibilities (as
generally described in this Agreement) as determined by the
Board/Member, provided that the Company has given
Employee written notice specifying the unsatisfactory
performance of his duties and responsibilities and a reasonable
opportunity to cure, and Employee has failed to cure such
deficiencies; (ii) a material breach by Employee of any of
his obligations hereunder which remains uncured after the lapse
of thirty (30) days following the date that the Company has
given Employee written notice thereof; (iii) a breach by
Employee of his duty not to engage in any transaction that
represents, directly or indirectly, self-dealing with the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities which
has not been approved by a majority of the disinterested
directors of the Board/Member or of the terms of his employment;
(iv) any act of intentional dishonesty, willful misconduct,
embezzlement, intentional fraud or similar conduct involving the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities;
(v) the conviction or the plea of nolo contendere or
the equivalent in respect of a felony involving moral turpitude;
or (vi) intentional, malicious infliction of any damage of
a material nature to any property of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities. If Employees
employment is terminated by the Company for Cause or by Employee
for any reason, Employee shall
M-2
be entitled to receive following the date of such termination:
(A) the Base Salary through the date of termination;
(B) reimbursement for any unreimbursed business expenses
properly incurred by Employee in accordance with Company policy
prior to the date of Employees termination; and
(C) any earned but unpaid benefits, if any, through the
date of termination in accordance with the applicable employee
benefit plan of the Company (the amounts described in
clauses (A) through (C) of this Section 4(a),
reduced by any amounts owed by Employee to the Company, being
referred to as the Accrued Rights). In
addition, except as may otherwise be expressly provided in any
plan, agreement or other instrument that governs the terms of
any stock option or other incentive compensation, all unvested
stock options and other incentive compensation shall immediately
be cancelled and forfeited. Following such termination of
Employees employment by the Company for Cause or by
Employee for any reason, except as set forth in this
Section 4(a), Employee shall have no further rights to any
compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
b. Disability or
Death. Employees employment shall
terminate upon Employees death and may be terminated by
the Company if Employee becomes (in the good faith judgment of
the Board/Member) physically or mentally incapacitated and is
therefore unable for a period of three (3) consecutive
months or for an aggregate of six (6) months in any twelve
(12) consecutive month period to perform Employees
duties (such incapacity is hereinafter referred to as
Disability). Upon termination of
Employees employment hereunder by reason of his Disability
or death, Employee or Employees estate (as the case may
be) shall be entitled to receive the Accrued Rights following
the date of such termination. Employees rights with
respect to any stock option or other incentive compensation
shall be determined by the terms of any plan, agreement or other
instrument that governs the terms of any such stock options or
other incentive compensation. Following Employees
termination of employment due to death or Disability, except as
set forth in this Section 4(b), Employee shall have no
further rights to any compensation or benefits from the Company
or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this
Agreement or otherwise.
c. By the Company Without
Cause. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Company at any time without Cause. If
Employees employment is terminated by the Company without
Cause (other than by reason of death or Disability), Employee
shall be entitled to receive: (i) the Accrued Rights
following the date of such termination; and (ii) subject to
Employees execution (within thirty (30) days
following the date of termination) and non-revocation of a
release of claims in favor of the Company in a form provided by
the Company (which release excludes from its scope claims under
any continuing right under any benefit or stock option plan or
agreement), a payment equal to the amount of Employees
then current Base Salary that would have been payable over a
three (3) month period following the date of such
termination, payable monthly in accordance with the
Companys normal payment schedule and practices beginning
on the next regular payroll distribution after the date that the
release of claims becomes irrevocable, and all previously
granted unvested options shall cease vesting upon the date of
such termination. Following Employees termination of
employment by the Company without Cause (other than by reason of
Employees death or Disability), except as set forth in
this Section 4(c), Employee shall have no further rights to
any compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
d. By the Employee For Good
Reason. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Employee for Good Reason (as hereinafter
defined). For purposes of this Agreement, Good
Reason shall mean the occurrence of any of the following
without the Employees prior written consent: (i) a
material reduction of Employees duties, position, job
title, or responsibilities; (ii) a reduction of
Employees base salary or total compensation package;
(iii) Employee being forced to relocate; or (iv) the
Company requires Employee to perform illegal or fraudulent acts.
However, none of the foregoing events or conditions shall
constitute Good Reason unless: (x) the Employee delivers to
the Company a written notice identifying in reasonable detail
the act or acts constituting Good Reason and his
intention to so terminate his employment (a Notice of
Good Reason), within fifteen (15) days following
the Employees knowledge of the circumstances constituting
Good Reason; (y) the Company does not reverse
or otherwise cure the event or condition within fifteen
(15) days after the date that the Notice of Good Reason is
delivered; and (z) the Employee resigns his employment no
earlier than five (5) and no later than fifteen
(15) days following the expiration of that cure period. If
the Employee terminates his employment for Good Reason (other
than by reason of death or Disability), Employee shall be
entitled to receive: (i) the Accrued Rights following the
date of such termination; and (ii) subject to
Employees execution (within thirty (30) days
following the date of
M-3
termination) and non-revocation of a release of claims in favor
of the Company in a form provided by the Company (which release
excludes from its scope claims under any continuing right under
any benefit or stock option plan or agreement), a payment equal
to the amount of Employees then current Base Salary that
would have been payable over a three (3) month period
following the date of such termination, payable monthly in
accordance with the Companys normal payment schedule and
practices beginning on the next regular payroll distribution
after the date that the release of claims becomes irrevocable,
and all previously granted unvested options shall cease vesting
upon the date of such termination. Following Employees
termination of employment by the Employee for Good Reason (other
than by reason of death or Disability), except as set forth in
this Section 4(d), Employee shall have no further rights to
any compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
e. Company Property. Upon any
termination of Employees employment with the Company or
any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or earlier upon
request, Employee shall promptly return to the Company all
property of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated
entities in Employees possession and deliver to the
Company all copies of all correspondence, documents, data and
other materials belonging to or containing proprietary
information of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities.
f. Section 409A Provisions.
(i) A termination of employment shall not be deemed to have
occurred for purposes of any provision of this Agreement
providing for the payment of any amounts or benefits upon or
following a termination of employment unless such termination is
also a separation from service within the meaning of
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code) and, for purposes of any
such provision of this Agreement, references to a
termination, termination of employment
or like terms shall mean separation from service. If
Employee is deemed on the date of termination to be a
specified employee within the meaning of that term
under Section 409A(a)(2)(B) of the Code, then with regard
to any payment or the provision of any benefit that is
considered deferred compensation under Section 409A of the
Code payable on account of a separation from
service, such payment or benefit shall be made or provided
at the date which is the earlier of (A) the expiration of
the six (6)-month period measured from the date of such
separation from service of Employee, and
(B) the date of Employees death (the Delay
Period). Upon the expiration of the Delay Period, all
payments and benefits delayed pursuant to this paragraph
(whether they would have otherwise been payable in a single sum
or in installments in the absence of such delay) shall be paid
or reimbursed to Employee in a lump sum as soon as
administratively practicable, and any remaining payments and
benefits due under this Agreement shall be paid or provided in
accordance with the normal payment dates specified for them
herein.
(ii) With regard to any provision herein that provides for
reimbursement of costs and expenses or in-kind benefits, except
as permitted by Section 409A of the Code, (A) the
right to reimbursement or in-kind benefits shall not be subject
to liquidation or exchange for another benefit, (B) the
amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind
benefits, provided during any taxable year shall not affect the
expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind benefits to be
provided, in any other taxable year, provided that the
foregoing clause (B) shall not be violated without regard
to expenses reimbursed under any arrangement covered by
Section 105(b) of the Code solely because such expenses are
subject to a limit related to the period the arrangement is in
effect and (C) such payments shall be made on or before the
last day of Employees taxable year following the taxable
year in which the expense occurred.
5. Restrictive Covenants.
a. Confidentiality. Employee
acknowledges that Employee has signed and agrees to be bound by
all of the terms and conditions of that certain Non-Disclosure
Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement (the
Proprietary Information Agreement), attached
as Exhibit C to this Agreement, which agreement
shall remain in full force and effect at all times during and
after the Employment Period, and the terms of which shall apply
with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
herein or in the Proprietary Information Agreement, neither this
Agreement or the Proprietary Information Agreement shall affect
any of Employees pre-existing obligations under any
non-disclosure, non-competition or proprietary information and
inventions agreement or similar agreement between Employee and
the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities.
M-4
b. Agreement Not to
Compete/Non-Solicitation. Employee agrees
that during the Employment Period, Employee shall not, directly
or indirectly:
(i) acquire or hold any interest in, manage, operate, join,
control, or engage or participate in any capacity in the
financing, ownership, management, operation or control of, be or
become an officer, director, stockholder, owner, co-owner,
partner, trustee, consultant, or advisor to, contract or permit
Employees name or likeness to be used by, or be employed
by, render or perform services for or connected in any manner
with, any third party, firm, company, entity, person, business
or other enterprise which is engaged in any line of business in
which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities or any of their respective successors or assigns is
engaged or proposes to be engaged during the Employment Period;
provided, however, that such restriction shall not
apply to any ownership as a passive investment of less than 1%
of the outstanding shares of the capital stock of a
publicly-held corporation if (A) such shares are actively
traded on the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Global
Market or similar market or exchange and (B) Employee is
not otherwise associated directly or indirectly with such
corporation or any affiliate of such corporation;
(ii) encourage, induce, recruit, hire, solicit or attempt
to solicit or induce, or take any other action which is intended
to induce or encourage, or has the effect of inducing or
encouraging, any person who is a full-time, part-time or
temporary employee or contractor of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities or who was an employee or
contractor of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities at any time during prior six-month period,
or encourage or otherwise cause any such employee or contractor
to terminate or alter his or her employment or other
relationship, whether such employment is pursuant to a written
agreement, for a predetermined period, or is at-will, with the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or to
accept employment with or perform services for any third party,
firm, company, entity, person, business or other
enterprise; or
(iii) interfere or attempt to interfere with existing
relationships that may exist between the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or any of their respective
successors or assigns, and any of their respective customers,
suppliers, consultants, clients, licensees, licensors, landlords
or other business relations, or approach, contact, solicit,
induce, request, advise, recruit or otherwise encourage any
existing or prospective customers, suppliers, consultants,
clients, licensees, licensors, landlords, strategic partners or
vendors, or other business relations of the Company or any of
its subsidiaries or affiliated entities to cease doing business
or withdraw, curtail or cancel or otherwise alter their business
dealings or relationship with the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities (including by making any
negative or disparaging statements or communications about the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities),
including on behalf of or to move such business or relationship
to, any third party, firm, company, entity, person, business or
other enterprise; provided, however, that
notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of this Agreement,
the placement of general advertisements which may be targeted to
a particular geographic or technical area but which are not
targeted directly or indirectly towards employees of the Company
or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any of
their respective successors or assigns is engaged shall not be
deemed to be a solicitation under this Agreement.
(iv) Exceptions to this Section 5(b) can only be
approved by prior written approval of the Parents Board of
Directors.
c. During the Employment Period and following any
termination of this Agreement, Employee agrees not to make any
public statements (whether written or oral and whether to the
media, any third party or otherwise), that are detrimental,
prejudicial, disparaging, libelous, slanderous or damaging to,
or would otherwise reflect negatively on the reputation of, the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any
of their respective members, officers, employees,
representatives, counsel, affiliates, successors, assigns,
products or businesses. Employee further agrees that he will not
act in any manner that might interfere with the business or
disparage the reputation of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any of their respective
members, officers, employees, representatives, counsel or
affiliates. Nothing set forth in this Section 5(c) shall
prohibit or limit in any way Employees right to accurately
and honestly respond as required or to cooperate with any valid
government, court or regulatory order or request.
M-5
d. Remedies. Employee acknowledges
that in the event of breach or threatened breach by Employee of
any of the terms of this Section 5, the Company and its
subsidiaries and affiliated entities would suffer significant
and irreparable harm that can not be satisfactorily compensated
in monetary terms, and that the remedies at law available to the
Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated entities will
otherwise be inadequate and, therefore, the Company and its
subsidiaries and affiliated entities shall be entitled,
notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10(e), to
specific performance of this Agreement by Employee, including
the immediate ex parte issuance of a temporary,
preliminary and final injunction enjoining Employee from any
such violation or threatened violation of this Section 5,
and to exercise such remedies cumulatively or in conjunction
with any and all other rights and remedies provided by law or in
equity and under this Agreement. Employee hereby acknowledges
and agrees that the Company shall not be required to post bond
as a condition to obtaining or exercising any such remedies, and
Employee hereby waives any such requirement or condition and the
Employee agrees that he or she shall not plead adequacy of any
relief at law available to the Company or its successors or
assigns (as applicable) (including monetary damages) as a
defense to any petition, claim or motion for preliminary or
final injunctive relief to enforce any provision of this
Agreement. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the
Company may terminate the payment of any amount or benefits
payable to Employee under this Agreement in the event of a
breach of any of the covenants set forth in this Section 5.
(i) In the event that the Employee or the Company or its
successors or assigns (as applicable) should contest the
enforceability of any provision of this Agreement in any court
of competent jurisdiction, then any time period associated with
any such challenged provision shall be deemed suspended at the
time of filing the action in which such enforceability is
contested. In the event that the enforceability of any such
provision is upheld by such court of competent jurisdiction, all
periods of appeal having expired thereon, then the remaining
portion of any such time period shall automatically thereafter
once again become effective. For purposes of this Agreement, the
remaining portion of any such time period shall be the
difference between the full stated time period in this Agreement
relating to any such provision, less any time that Employee
complied with such provision prior to the filing of the
aforesaid action and less any time that Employee was restrained
by temporary restraining order, permanent injunction or similar
order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction from
violating any such provision during the pendency of such action
or proceeding.
(ii) The rights and remedies of Company hereunder are not
exclusive of or limited by any other rights or remedies that
Company may have, whether at law, in equity, by contract or
otherwise, all of which shall be cumulative (and not
alternative), and the exercise by a party of any one remedy will
not preclude the exercise of any other remedy. Without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, the rights and remedies of
Company hereunder, and the obligations and liabilities of
Employee hereunder, are in addition to their respective rights,
remedies, obligations and liabilities under the law of unfair
competition, misappropriation of trade secrets and the like.
This Agreement does not limit Employees obligations or the
rights of Company (or any affiliate of Company) under the terms
of any other agreement between Employee and Company or any
affiliate of Company.
(iii) If Company, any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities or their respective successors or assigns (as
applicable) successfully, in whole or part, asserts an action at
law or in equity to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement,
then Company, its Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or its
successors or assigns (as applicable), shall be entitled to
recover from Employee all reasonable attorneys fees,
costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other
relief to which it may be entitled. If Employee successfully, in
whole or part, asserts an action at law or in equity to enforce
any of the terms of this Agreement, then Employee shall be
entitled to recover from Company, any of its Subsidiaries or
affiliated entities or their respective successors or assigns
(as applicable) all reasonable attorneys fees, costs, and
necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which
Employee may be entitled.
6. Company Options. Employee
acknowledges and agrees that at the Effective Time, any and all
Company Options held by Employee as of the Effective Time will
automatically and without any action by Employee be terminated
in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Merger
Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary that may be
set forth in any plan, agreement or other instrument that
otherwise governs the terms of such Company Options.
M-6
7. Indemnification. The Articles
of Incorporation or the Operating Agreement of the Company, as
the case may be, shall provide for indemnification of the
Employee to the maximum extent permitted by law. The Company
shall maintain a Directors and Officers insurance
policy that is reasonably acceptable to the Parent, with such
amounts of coverage that is customary given the size and
business of the Company, and a premium that is commercially
reasonable, for so long as the Parent maintains such insurance
for the benefit of the officers of the Parent.
8. Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed
duly given (a) on the date of delivery if delivered
personally, or if by facsimile, upon written confirmation of
receipt by facsimile, (b) on the first (1st) Business Day
following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized courier under circumstances in which such courier
guarantees
next-day
delivery (except in the case of overseas delivery, in which case
notice shall be deemed duly given on the third (3rd) Business
Day following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized international courier under circumstances in which
such courier guarantees such delivery) or (c) on the
earlier of confirmed receipt or the fifth Business Day following
the date of mailing if delivered by registered or certified
mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid (except in the
case of overseas delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed
duly given on confirmed receipt if delivered by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid). All
notices hereunder shall be delivered to the addresses set forth
below, or pursuant to such other instructions as may be
designated in writing by the party to receive such notice:
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13,
85737, Ismaning Germany
Attention: Felix Marx
Facsimile: +49.89.9595.5170
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105
Attention: Michael L. Reed
Facsimile: 415.374.8459
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
1900-B Carnegie Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Attention: Larry Midland
Facsimile: 949.250.7372
(iii) if to Employee, to the address of Employee set forth
on the signature page hereto.
9. Taxation. The Company may
withhold from any payments made to Employee under the Agreement
any and all federal, state, city, foreign or other applicable
taxes as shall be required pursuant to any applicable law,
governmental regulation or ruling.
10. Survival. Sections 1, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of this Agreement shall survive and remain
in full force and effect following any termination of this
Agreement or Employees employment with the Company.
11. Miscellaneous.
a. Entire Agreement. Except as
expressly set forth in Section 5(a), this Agreement,
together with the Proprietary Information Agreement, constitutes
the entire agreement, and supersede all prior written
agreements, arrangements, communications and understandings and
all prior and contemporaneous oral agreements, arrangements,
communications and understandings among the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof and thereof.
M-7
b. Amendment; Waiver. This
Agreement may not be amended, modified or supplemented in any
manner, whether by course of conduct or otherwise, except by an
instrument in writing specifically designated as an amendment
hereto, signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto and
Parent. Any agreement on the part of a party to any waiver shall
be valid only if set forth in a written instrument executed and
delivered by such party. No failure or delay of any party in
exercising any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a
waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any
such right or power, or any abandonment or discontinuance of
steps to enforce such right or power, or any course of conduct,
preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise
of any other right or power.
c. Binding Effect; Assignment. The
rights and obligations of this Agreement shall bind and inure to
the benefit of any successor of the Company by reorganization,
merger or consolidation, or any assignee of all or substantially
all of the Companys business and properties. The Company
may assign its rights and delegate its obligations hereunder to
any of its affiliates without the consent of Employee,
provided that Company remains ultimately liable for all
of Companys obligations hereunder. Employees rights
or obligations under this Agreement may not be assigned by
Employee.
d. Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
and public policy (other than conflict of laws principles) of
the State of California applicable to contracts executed and to
be wholly performed within such state.
e. Dispute Resolution And Binding
Arbitration. Employee and the Company agree
that in the event a dispute arises concerning or relating to
this Agreement, or to Employees employment with the
Company, or any termination therefrom, all such disputes shall
be submitted to binding arbitration before an arbitrator
experienced in employment law. Said arbitration will be
conducted in accordance with the rules applicable to employment
disputes of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services
(JAMS). The Company will be responsible for
paying any filing fees and costs of the arbitration proceeding
itself (for example, arbitrators fees, conference room,
transcripts), but each party shall be responsible for its own
attorneys fees. The Company and Employee agree that this
promise to arbitrate covers any disputes that the Company may
have against Employee, or that Employee may have against the
Company and all of its affiliated entities and their directors,
officers and Employees, arising out of or relating to this
Agreement, the employment relationship or termination of
employment, including any claims concerning the validity,
interpretation, effect or violation of this Agreement; violation
of any federal, state, or local law; any tort; and any other
aspect of Employees compensation or employment. The
Company and Employee further agree that arbitration as provided
in this Section 11(e) shall be the exclusive and binding
remedy for any such dispute and will be used instead of any
court action, which is hereby expressly waived, except for any
request by either party hereto for temporary or preliminary
injunctive relief pending arbitration in accordance with
applicable law, or an administrative claim with an
administrative agency. The Federal Arbitration Act shall govern
the interpretation and enforcement of such arbitration
proceeding. The arbitrator shall apply the substantive law (and
the law of remedies, if applicable) of the State of California,
or federal law, if California law is preempted. The arbitration
shall be conducted in Los Angeles, California, unless otherwise
mutually agreed.
THE
COMPANY AND EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT BY AGREEING TO
ARBITRATE, THEY ARE WAIVING ANY RIGHT TO BRING AN ACTION AGAINST
THE OTHER IN A COURT OF LAW, EITHER STATE OR FEDERAL, AND ARE
WAIVING THE RIGHT TO HAVE CLAIMS AND DAMAGES, IF ANY, DETERMINED
BY A JURY.
f. Severability. Whenever
possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this
Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective
and valid under applicable law. Any provision of this Agreement
which is deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any
jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction and subject to this
paragraph, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability, without affecting in any way the
remaining provisions hereof in such jurisdiction or rendering
that any other provisions of this Agreement invalid, illegal or
unenforceable in any other jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if any provision of this Agreement should be deemed
invalid, illegal or unenforceable because its scope or duration
is considered excessive, such provision shall be modified so
that the scope of the provision is reduced only to the minimum
extent necessary to render the modified provision valid, legal
and enforceable.
M-8
g. Employee
Acknowledgment. Employee acknowledges that he
has had the opportunity to consult legal counsel in regard to
this Agreement, that he has read and understands this Agreement,
that he is fully aware of its legal effect, and that he has
entered into it freely and voluntarily and based on his own
judgment and not on any representations, warranties or promises
other than those contained in this Agreement.
h. Further Assurances. Each of the
parties agrees to execute, acknowledge, deliver and perform, and
cause to be executed, acknowledged, delivered and performed, at
any time and from time to time, as the case may be, all such
further acts, deeds, assignments, transfers, conveyances, powers
of attorney and assurances as may be reasonably necessary to
carry out the provisions or intent of this Agreement.
i. Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall
be considered one and the same instrument and shall become
effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each
of the parties and delivered to the other party. This Agreement
may be executed by facsimile signature and a facsimile signature
shall constitute an original for all purposes.
[Signature
page follows]
M-9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this
Agreement, or caused this Agreement to be duly executed, as of
the day and year first above written.
HIRSCH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Name: Larry Midland
EMPLOYEE
John W. Piccininni
Address:
47 Shearwater Pl.
Newport Beach, CA 92260
[Signature
page to Piccininni Employment Agreement]
M-10
Annex N
EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT
This Employment Agreement (this Agreement) is
dated as of December 10, 2008, by and between Hirsch
Electronics Corporation, a California corporation (the
Company), and Mr. Rob Zivney (the
Employee).
WHEREAS, SCM Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(Parent), the Company and certain other
parties thereto have entered into that certain Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated as of December 10, 2008 (the
Merger Agreement), pursuant to which, among
other things, through a two-step merger the Company will become
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent and be transformed into a
new Delaware limited liability company (together as used herein,
the Merger).
WHEREAS, as an inducement for and a condition to Parent agreeing
to enter into the Merger Agreement and in consideration of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, concurrently
with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Employee and the
Company have agreed to enter into this Agreement which will set
forth the terms of Employees employment by the Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
promises, representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the Company and Employee agree as follows:
1. Effective Date. This Agreement
shall automatically and immediately become effective at, and not
before, the Effective Time, as such term is defined in the
Merger Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, this Agreement
shall not become effective, shall have no force or effect, and
shall be null and void.
2. Employment; Employment Period; Position;
Duties.
a. The Company hereby agrees to employ Employee, and
Employee hereby accepts such employment with the Company, in
each case, on the terms and subject to the conditions
hereinafter set forth. Subject to any earlier termination of
Employees employment as provided herein, Employees
employment hereunder shall be for an initial term commencing at
the Effective Time and ending on the third (3rd) anniversary of
the Effective Time (the Employment Period).
Beginning on the third (3rd) anniversary and continuing on each
anniversary thereafter, the employment agreement shall
automatically extend for a period of one (1) year, subject
to any termination of Employees employment as provided
herein.
b. Employee shall serve as the Companys Vice
President Marketing, and shall report directly to Larry Midland
(the Reporting Officer). Employee shall also
serve in such other capacities as may be requested from time to
time by the Reporting Officer, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company
and/or the
Board of Directors of the Company or the sole member of the
Company, as the case may be (the
Board/Member) or a duly authorized committee
thereof. Employee shall perform such duties as are customarily
associated with his position and as reasonably required by the
Reporting Officer. Employee shall also render such other
services for the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities as the Company may from time to time request that are
generally commensurate with such Employees title. Employee
agrees to serve the Company faithfully and perform such duties
and services using his best efforts and abilities. Employee
agrees to devote his full-time attention and energies
exclusively to the business of the Company and the performance
of his duties and services, and to act at all times in the best
interests of the Company. Employee agrees to conduct himself at
all times in a business-like and professional manner as
appropriate for a person in Employees position and to
represent the Company in all respects in a manner that comports
with sound business judgment in the highest ethical standards.
Employee will be subject to and abide by the policies and
procedures of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated
companies, as adopted and revised by the Company or any of its
subsidiaries and affiliated companies from time to time.
Employee shall be subject to the direction of the Company, which
shall retain full control over the means and methods by which
Employee performs his duties and the above services and of the
place(s) at which all such duties and services are rendered.
Employees principal place of employment shall be at the
Companys offices in Santa Ana, California.
N-1
3. Compensation; Benefits.
a. Base Salary. As compensation
for services rendered to the Company, Employee shall be entitled
to a base salary at the annual rate of $180,000 (one hundred and
eighty thousand dollars), payable in accordance with the regular
payroll practices of the Company for its employees. Employee
shall be eligible to such merit increases in Employees
base salary, if any, as may be determined from time to time in
the sole discretion of the Board/Member. Employees annual
base salary rate, as in effect from time to time, is hereinafter
referred to as the Base Salary.
b. Bonus. Employee shall be
eligible to receive an annual target based variable bonus, of up
to 40% of the Employees annual base salary (subject to
increase upon achievement of sales targets as identified in the
Parents MBO Bonus Program), based upon the achievement of
personal performance targets established by the Parents
Board of Directors in consultation with Employee, and the
overall success of the Company. Any bonus would be subject to
the terms and conditions of the Parents MBO Bonus Program,
as the same may be amended from time to time, and the
Employees continuing employment. The achievement of the
performance and other target would be determined and any
resulting bonus would be payable on a quarterly basis (up to a
maximum bonus of 10% of the Employees annual base salary
per quarter). A copy of the Parents MBO Bonus Program as
currently in effect is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
c. Stock Options. Upon the
Effective Time, the Employee shall be eligible to participate in
Parents Stock Option Plan. It is anticipated that the
Employee will receive a one-time grant of a non-qualified stock
option to purchase 25,000 (twenty-five thousand) shares of the
Parents common stock, subject to the terms and conditions
of the Parents Stock Option Plan. Any such grant is
subject to approval by the Parents Board of Directors. A
copy of the Parents Stock Option Plan as currently in
effect is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
d. Other Employee
Benefits. Employee shall be eligible to
receive or participate in any incentive, retirement, vacation,
sick or family leave, reimbursement for travel and entertainment
expenses, health and insurance or other benefits of the Company,
as in effect from time to time, on the same basis as other
employees of the Company occupying positions with responsibility
and salary comparable to that of Employee, but in any event not
materially inferior to the benefits the Employee enjoyed as an
employee of the Company prior to the Merger. The Company may at
any time and from time to time change, amend, modify or
completely eliminate any such plans, programs and benefits
available to its employees and Employees participation in
any such plans, programs and benefits shall not affect such
right of the Company; Employee agrees and acknowledges that he
shall have no vested rights under or to participate in any such
plans, programs and benefits except as expressly provided under
the terms thereof.
4. Termination of
Employment. Employees employment with
the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities
may be terminated by Company at any time and for any or no
reason. Employee will be required to give the Company three
(3) months advance written notice of any resignation of
Employees employment. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Agreement, the provisions of this Section 4 shall
exclusively govern Employees rights upon termination of
employment with the Company and any of its subsidiaries or
affiliates entities for Cause, death or Disability or any other
reason.
a. By the Company For Cause; Resignation by
Employee. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Company for Cause at any time. For purposes of
this Agreement, Cause shall mean:
(i) unsatisfactory performance in any material respect of
Employees duties, services or responsibilities (as
generally described in this Agreement) as determined by the
Board/Member, provided that the Company has given
Employee written notice specifying the unsatisfactory
performance of his duties and responsibilities and a reasonable
opportunity to cure, and Employee has failed to cure such
deficiencies; (ii) a material breach by Employee of any of
his obligations hereunder which remains uncured after the lapse
of thirty (30) days following the date that the Company has
given Employee written notice thereof; (iii) a breach by
Employee of his duty not to engage in any transaction that
represents, directly or indirectly, self-dealing with the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities which
has not been approved by a majority of the disinterested
directors of the Board/Member or of the terms of his employment;
(iv) any act of intentional dishonesty, willful misconduct,
embezzlement, intentional fraud or similar conduct involving the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities;
(v) the conviction or the plea of nolo contendere or
the equivalent in respect of a felony involving moral turpitude;
or (vi) intentional, malicious infliction of any damage of
a material nature to any property of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities. If Employees
employment is terminated by the Company for Cause or by Employee
for any reason, Employee shall
N-2
be entitled to receive following the date of such termination:
(A) the Base Salary through the date of termination;
(B) reimbursement for any unreimbursed business expenses
properly incurred by Employee in accordance with Company policy
prior to the date of Employees termination; and
(C) any earned but unpaid benefits, if any, through the
date of termination in accordance with the applicable employee
benefit plan of the Company (the amounts described in
clauses (A) through (C) of this Section 4(a),
reduced by any amounts owed by Employee to the Company, being
referred to as the Accrued Rights). In
addition, except as may otherwise be expressly provided in any
plan, agreement or other instrument that governs the terms of
any stock option or other incentive compensation, all unvested
stock options and other incentive compensation shall immediately
be cancelled and forfeited. Following such termination of
Employees employment by the Company for Cause or by
Employee for any reason, except as set forth in this
Section 4(a), Employee shall have no further rights to any
compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
b. Disability or
Death. Employees employment shall
terminate upon Employees death and may be terminated by
the Company if Employee becomes (in the good faith judgment of
the Board/Member) physically or mentally incapacitated and is
therefore unable for a period of three (3) consecutive
months or for an aggregate of six (6) months in any twelve
(12) consecutive month period to perform Employees
duties (such incapacity is hereinafter referred to as
Disability). Upon termination of
Employees employment hereunder by reason of his Disability
or death, Employee or Employees estate (as the case may
be) shall be entitled to receive the Accrued Rights following
the date of such termination. Employees rights with
respect to any stock option or other incentive compensation
shall be determined by the terms of any plan, agreement or other
instrument that governs the terms of any such stock options or
other incentive compensation. Following Employees
termination of employment due to death or Disability, except as
set forth in this Section 4(b), Employee shall have no
further rights to any compensation or benefits from the Company
or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this
Agreement or otherwise.
c. By the Company Without
Cause. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Company at any time without Cause. If
Employees employment is terminated by the Company without
Cause (other than by reason of death or Disability), Employee
shall be entitled to receive: (i) the Accrued Rights
following the date of such termination; and (ii) subject to
Employees execution (within thirty (30) days
following the date of termination) and non-revocation of a
release of claims in favor of the Company in a form provided by
the Company, a payment equal to the amount of Employees
then current Base Salary that would have been payable over a
three (3) month period following the date of such
termination, payable monthly in accordance with the
Companys normal payment schedule and practices beginning
on the next regular payroll distribution after the date that the
release of claims becomes irrevocable, and all previously
granted unvested options shall cease vesting upon the date of
such termination. Following Employees termination of
employment by the Company without Cause (other than by reason of
Employees death or Disability), except as set forth in
this Section 4(c), Employee shall have no further rights to
any compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
d. By the Employee For Good
Reason. Employees employment may be
terminated by the Employee for Good Reason (as hereinafter
defined). For purposes of this Agreement, Good
Reason shall mean the occurrence of any of the following
without the Employees prior written consent: (i) a
material reduction of Employees duties, position, job
title, or responsibilities; (ii) a reduction of
Employees base salary or total compensation package;
(iii) Employee being forced to relocate; or (iv) the
Company requires Employee to perform illegal or fraudulent acts.
However, none of the foregoing events or conditions shall
constitute Good Reason unless: (x) the Employee delivers to
the Company a written notice identifying in reasonable detail
the act or acts constituting Good Reason and his
intention to so terminate his employment (a Notice of
Good Reason), within fifteen (15) days following
the Employees knowledge of the circumstances constituting
Good Reason; (y) the Company does not reverse
or otherwise cure the event or condition within fifteen
(15) days after the date that the Notice of Good Reason is
delivered; and (z) the Employee resigns his employment no
earlier than five (5) and no later than fifteen
(15) days following the expiration of that cure period. If
the Employee terminates his employment for Good Reason (other
than by reason of death or Disability), Employee shall be
entitled to receive: (i) the Accrued Rights following the
date of such termination; and (ii) subject to
Employees execution (within thirty (30) days
following the date of termination) and non-revocation of a
release of claims in favor of the Company in a form provided by
the Company
N-3
(which release excludes from its scope claims under any
continuing right under any benefit or stock option plan or
agreement), a payment equal to the amount of Employees
then current Base Salary that would have been payable over a
three (3) month period following the date of such
termination, payable monthly in accordance with the
Companys normal payment schedule and practices beginning
on the next regular payroll distribution after the date that the
release of claims becomes irrevocable, and all previously
granted unvested options shall cease vesting upon the date of
such termination. Following Employees termination of
employment by the Employee for Good Reason (other than by reason
of death or Disability), except as set forth in this
Section 4(d), Employee shall have no further rights to any
compensation or benefits from the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities under this Agreement or
otherwise.
e. Company Property. Upon any
termination of Employees employment with the Company or
any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or earlier upon
request, Employee shall promptly return to the Company all
property of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated
entities in Employees possession and deliver to the
Company all copies of all correspondence, documents, data and
other materials belonging to or containing proprietary
information of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities.
f. Section 409A Provisions.
(i) A termination of employment shall not be deemed to have
occurred for purposes of any provision of this Agreement
providing for the payment of any amounts or benefits upon or
following a termination of employment unless such termination is
also a separation from service within the meaning of
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code) and, for purposes of any
such provision of this Agreement, references to a
termination, termination of employment
or like terms shall mean separation from service. If
Employee is deemed on the date of termination to be a
specified employee within the meaning of that term
under Section 409A(a)(2)(B) of the Code, then with regard
to any payment or the provision of any benefit that is
considered deferred compensation under Section 409A of the
Code payable on account of a separation from
service, such payment or benefit shall be made or provided
at the date which is the earlier of (A) the expiration of
the six (6)-month period measured from the date of such
separation from service of Employee, and
(B) the date of Employees death (the Delay
Period). Upon the expiration of the Delay Period, all
payments and benefits delayed pursuant to this paragraph
(whether they would have otherwise been payable in a single sum
or in installments in the absence of such delay) shall be paid
or reimbursed to Employee in a lump sum as soon as
administratively practicable, and any remaining payments and
benefits due under this Agreement shall be paid or provided in
accordance with the normal payment dates specified for them
herein.
(ii) With regard to any provision herein that provides for
reimbursement of costs and expenses or in-kind benefits, except
as permitted by Section 409A of the Code, (A) the
right to reimbursement or in-kind benefits shall not be subject
to liquidation or exchange for another benefit, (B) the
amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind
benefits, provided during any taxable year shall not affect the
expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind benefits to be
provided, in any other taxable year, provided that the
foregoing clause (B) shall not be violated without regard
to expenses reimbursed under any arrangement covered by
Section 105(b) of the Code solely because such expenses are
subject to a limit related to the period the arrangement is in
effect and (C) such payments shall be made on or before the
last day of Employees taxable year following the taxable
year in which the expense occurred.
5. Restrictive Covenants.
a. Confidentiality. Employee
acknowledges that Employee has signed and agrees to be bound by
all of the terms and conditions of that certain Proprietary
Information and Inventions Agreement (the Proprietary
Information Agreement), attached as
Exhibit C to this Agreement, which agreement shall
remain in full force and effect at all times during and after
the Employment Period, and the terms of which shall apply with
respect to the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
herein or in the Proprietary Information Agreement, neither this
Agreement or the Proprietary Information Agreement shall affect
any of Employees pre-existing obligations under any
non-disclosure, non-competition or proprietary information and
inventions agreement or similar agreement between Employee and
the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities.
N-4
b. Agreement Not to
Compete/Non-Solicitation. Employee agrees
that during the Employment Period, Employee shall not, directly
or indirectly:
(i) acquire or hold any interest in, manage, operate, join,
control, or engage or participate in any capacity in the
financing, ownership, management, operation or control of, be or
become an officer, director, stockholder, owner, co-owner,
partner, trustee, consultant, or advisor to, contract or permit
Employees name or likeness to be used by, or be employed
by, render or perform services for or connected in any manner
with, any third party, firm, company, entity, person, business
or other enterprise which is engaged in any line of business in
which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities or any of their respective successors or assigns is
engaged or proposes to be engaged during the Employment Period;
provided, however, that such restriction shall not
apply to any ownership as a passive investment of less than 1%
of the outstanding shares of the capital stock of a
publicly-held corporation if (A) such shares are actively
traded on the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Global
Market or similar market or exchange and (B) Employee is
not otherwise associated directly or indirectly with such
corporation or any affiliate of such corporation;
(ii) encourage, induce, recruit, hire, solicit or attempt
to solicit or induce, or take any other action which is intended
to induce or encourage, or has the effect of inducing or
encouraging, any person who is a full-time, part-time or
temporary employee or contractor of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities or who was an employee or
contractor of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or
affiliated entities at any time during prior six-month period,
or encourage or otherwise cause any such employee or contractor
to terminate or alter his or her employment or other
relationship, whether such employment is pursuant to a written
agreement, for a predetermined period, or is at-will, with the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or to
accept employment with or perform services for any third party,
firm, company, entity, person, business or other
enterprise; or
(iii) interfere or attempt to interfere with existing
relationships that may exist between the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities, or any of their respective
successors or assigns, and any of their respective customers,
suppliers, consultants, clients, licensees, licensors, landlords
or other business relations, or approach, contact, solicit,
induce, request, advise, recruit or otherwise encourage any
existing or prospective customers, suppliers, consultants,
clients, licensees, licensors, landlords, strategic partners or
vendors, or other business relations of the Company or any of
its subsidiaries or affiliated entities to cease doing business
or withdraw, curtail or cancel or otherwise alter their business
dealings or relationship with the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities (including by making any
negative or disparaging statements or communications about the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities),
including on behalf of or to move such business or relationship
to, any third party, firm, company, entity, person, business or
other enterprise; provided, however, that
notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of this Agreement,
the placement of general advertisements which may be targeted to
a particular geographic or technical area but which are not
targeted directly or indirectly towards employees of the Company
or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any of
their respective successors or assigns is engaged shall not be
deemed to be a solicitation under this Agreement.
(iv) Exceptions to this Section 5(b) can only be
approved by prior written approval of the Parents Board of
Directors.
c. During the Employment Period and following any
termination of this Agreement, Employee agrees not to make any
public statements (whether written or oral and whether to the
media, any third party or otherwise), that are detrimental,
prejudicial, disparaging, libelous, slanderous or damaging to,
or would otherwise reflect negatively on the reputation of, the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any
of their respective members, officers, employees,
representatives, counsel, affiliates, successors, assigns,
products or businesses. Employee further agrees that he will not
act in any manner that might interfere with the business or
disparage the reputation of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliated entities or any of their respective
members, officers, employees, representatives, counsel or
affiliates. Nothing set forth in this Section 5(c) shall
prohibit or limit in any way Employees right to accurately
and honestly respond as required or to cooperate with any valid
government, court or regulatory order or request.
N-5
d. Remedies. Employee acknowledges
that in the event of breach or threatened breach by Employee of
any of the terms of this Section 5, the Company and its
subsidiaries and affiliated entities would suffer significant
and irreparable harm that can not be satisfactorily compensated
in monetary terms, and that the remedies at law available to the
Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated entities will
otherwise be inadequate and, therefore, the Company and its
subsidiaries and affiliated entities shall be entitled,
notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10(e), to
specific performance of this Agreement by Employee, including
the immediate ex parte issuance of a temporary,
preliminary and final injunction enjoining Employee from any
such violation or threatened violation of this Section 5,
and to exercise such remedies cumulatively or in conjunction
with any and all other rights and remedies provided by law or in
equity and under this Agreement. Employee hereby acknowledges
and agrees that the Company shall not be required to post bond
as a condition to obtaining or exercising any such remedies, and
Employee hereby waives any such requirement or condition and the
Employee agrees that he or she shall not plead adequacy of any
relief at law available to the Company or its successors or
assigns (as applicable) (including monetary damages) as a
defense to any petition, claim or motion for preliminary or
final injunctive relief to enforce any provision of this
Agreement. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the
Company may terminate the payment of any amount or benefits
payable to Employee under this Agreement in the event of a
breach of any of the covenants set forth in this Section 5.
(i) In the event that the Employee or the Company or its
successors or assigns (as applicable) should contest the
enforceability of any provision of this Agreement in any court
of competent jurisdiction, then any time period associated with
any such challenged provision shall be deemed suspended at the
time of filing the action in which such enforceability is
contested. In the event that the enforceability of any such
provision is upheld by such court of competent jurisdiction, all
periods of appeal having expired thereon, then the remaining
portion of any such time period shall automatically thereafter
once again become effective. For purposes of this Agreement, the
remaining portion of any such time period shall be the
difference between the full stated time period in this Agreement
relating to any such provision, less any time that Employee
complied with such provision prior to the filing of the
aforesaid action and less any time that Employee was restrained
by temporary restraining order, permanent injunction or similar
order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction from
violating any such provision during the pendency of such action
or proceeding.
(ii) The rights and remedies of Company hereunder are not
exclusive of or limited by any other rights or remedies that
Company may have, whether at law, in equity, by contract or
otherwise, all of which shall be cumulative (and not
alternative), and the exercise by a party of any one remedy will
not preclude the exercise of any other remedy. Without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, the rights and remedies of
Company hereunder, and the obligations and liabilities of
Employee hereunder, are in addition to their respective rights,
remedies, obligations and liabilities under the law of unfair
competition, misappropriation of trade secrets and the like.
This Agreement does not limit Employees obligations or the
rights of Company (or any affiliate of Company) under the terms
of any other agreement between Employee and Company or any
affiliate of Company.
(iii) If Company, any of its Subsidiaries or affiliated
entities or their respective successors or assigns (as
applicable) successfully, in whole or part, asserts an action at
law or in equity to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement,
then Company, its Subsidiaries or affiliated entities or its
successors or assigns (as applicable), shall be entitled to
recover from Employee all reasonable attorneys fees,
costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other
relief to which it may be entitled. If Employee successfully, in
whole or part, asserts an action at law or in equity to enforce
any of the terms of this Agreement, then Employee shall be
entitled to recover from Company, any of its Subsidiaries or
affiliated entities or their respective successors or assigns
(as applicable) all reasonable attorneys fees, costs, and
necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which
Employee may be entitled.
6. Company Options. Employee
acknowledges and agrees that at the Effective Time, any and all
Company Options held by Employee as of the Effective Time will
automatically and without any action by Employee be terminated
in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Merger
Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary that may be
set forth in any plan, agreement or other instrument that
otherwise governs the terms of such Company Options.
N-6
7. Indemnification. The Articles
of Incorporation or the Operating Agreement of the Company, as
the case may be, shall provide for indemnification of the
Employee to the maximum extent permitted by law. The Company
shall maintain a Directors and Officers insurance
policy that is reasonably acceptable to the Parent, with such
amounts of coverage that is customary given the size and
business of the Company, and a premium that is commercially
reasonable, for so long as the Parent maintains such insurance
for the benefit of the officers of the Parent.
8. Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed
duly given (a) on the date of delivery if delivered
personally, or if by facsimile, upon written confirmation of
receipt by facsimile, (b) on the first (1st) Business Day
following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized courier under circumstances in which such courier
guarantees
next-day
delivery (except in the case of overseas delivery, in which case
notice shall be deemed duly given on the third (3rd) Business
Day following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing a
recognized international courier under circumstances in which
such courier guarantees such delivery) or (c) on the
earlier of confirmed receipt or the fifth Business Day following
the date of mailing if delivered by registered or certified
mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid (except in the
case of overseas delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed
duly given on confirmed receipt if delivered by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid). All
notices hereunder shall be delivered to the addresses set forth
below, or pursuant to such other instructions as may be
designated in writing by the party to receive such notice:
(i) If to Parent, to:
SCM Microsystems, Inc.
Oskar-Messter-Straße 13,
85737, Ismaning Germany
Attention: Felix Marx
Facsimile: +49.89.9595.5170
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105
Attention: Michael L. Reed
Facsimile: 415.374.8459
(ii) If to the Company:
Hirsch Electronics Corporation
1900-B Carnegie Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Attention: Larry Midland
Facsimile: 949.250.7372
(iii) if to Employee, to the address of Employee set forth
on the signature page hereto.
9. Taxation. The Company may
withhold from any payments made to Employee under the Agreement
any and all federal, state, city, foreign or other applicable
taxes as shall be required pursuant to any applicable law,
governmental regulation or ruling.
10. Survival. Sections 1, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of this Agreement shall survive and remain
in full force and effect following any termination of this
Agreement or Employees employment with the Company.
11. Miscellaneous.
a. Entire Agreement. Except as
expressly set forth in Section 5(a), this Agreement,
together with the Non-Disclosure Proprietary Information
Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement, and supersede all
prior written agreements, arrangements, communications and
understandings and all prior and contemporaneous oral
agreements, arrangements, communications and understandings
among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
thereof.
N-7
b. Amendment; Waiver. This
Agreement may not be amended, modified or supplemented in any
manner, whether by course of conduct or otherwise, except by an
instrument in writing specifically designated as an amendment
hereto, signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto and
Parent. Any agreement on the part of a party to any waiver shall
be valid only if set forth in a written instrument executed and
delivered by such party. No failure or delay of any party in
exercising any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a
waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any
such right or power, or any abandonment or discontinuance of
steps to enforce such right or power, or any course of conduct,
preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise
of any other right or power.
c. Binding Effect; Assignment. The
rights and obligations of this Agreement shall bind and inure to
the benefit of any successor of the Company by reorganization,
merger or consolidation, or any assignee of all or substantially
all of the Companys business and properties. The Company
may assign its rights and delegate its obligations hereunder to
any of its affiliates without the consent of Employee,
provided that Company remains ultimately liable for all
of Companys obligations hereunder. Employees rights
or obligations under this Agreement may not be assigned by
Employee.
d. Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
and public policy (other than conflict of laws principles) of
the State of California applicable to contracts executed and to
be wholly performed within such state.
e. Dispute Resolution And Binding
Arbitration. Employee and the Company agree
that in the event a dispute arises concerning or relating to
this Agreement, or to Employees employment with the
Company, or any termination therefrom, all such disputes shall
be submitted to binding arbitration before an arbitrator
experienced in employment law. Said arbitration will be
conducted in accordance with the rules applicable to employment
disputes of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services
(JAMS). The Company will be responsible for
paying any filing fees and costs of the arbitration proceeding
itself (for example, arbitrators fees, conference room,
transcripts), but each party shall be responsible for its own
attorneys fees. The Company and Employee agree that this
promise to arbitrate covers any disputes that the Company may
have against Employee, or that Employee may have against the
Company and all of its affiliated entities and their directors,
officers and Employees, arising out of or relating to this
Agreement, the employment relationship or termination of
employment, including any claims concerning the validity,
interpretation, effect or violation of this Agreement; violation
of any federal, state, or local law; any tort; and any other
aspect of Employees compensation or employment. The
Company and Employee further agree that arbitration as provided
in this Section 10(e) shall be the exclusive and binding
remedy for any such dispute and will be used instead of any
court action, which is hereby expressly waived, except for any
request by either party hereto for temporary or preliminary
injunctive relief pending arbitration in accordance with
applicable law, or an administrative claim with an
administrative agency. The Federal Arbitration Act shall govern
the interpretation and enforcement of such arbitration
proceeding. The arbitrator shall apply the substantive law (and
the law of remedies, if applicable) of the State of California,
or federal law, if California law is preempted. The arbitration
shall be conducted in Los Angeles, California, unless otherwise
mutually agreed.
THE
COMPANY AND EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT BY AGREEING TO
ARBITRATE, THEY ARE WAIVING ANY RIGHT TO BRING AN ACTION AGAINST
THE OTHER IN A COURT OF LAW, EITHER STATE OR FEDERAL, AND ARE
WAIVING THE RIGHT TO HAVE CLAIMS AND DAMAGES, IF ANY, DETERMINED
BY A JURY.
f. Severability. Whenever
possible, each provision or portion of any provision of this
Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective
and valid under applicable law. Any provision of this Agreement
which is deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any
jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction and subject to this
paragraph, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability, without affecting in any way the
remaining provisions hereof in such jurisdiction or rendering
that any other provisions of this Agreement invalid, illegal or
unenforceable in any other jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if any provision of this Agreement should be deemed
invalid, illegal or unenforceable because its scope or duration
is considered excessive, such provision shall be modified so
that the scope of the provision is reduced only to the minimum
extent necessary to render the modified provision valid, legal
and enforceable.
N-8
g. Employee
Acknowledgment. Employee acknowledges that he
has had the opportunity to consult legal counsel in regard to
this Agreement, that he has read and understands this Agreement,
that he is fully aware of its legal effect, and that he has
entered into it freely and voluntarily and based on his own
judgment and not on any representations, warranties or promises
other than those contained in this Agreement.
h. Further Assurances. Each of the
parties agrees to execute, acknowledge, deliver and perform, and
cause to be executed, acknowledged, delivered and performed, at
any time and from time to time, as the case may be, all such
further acts, deeds, assignments, transfers, conveyances, powers
of attorney and assurances as may be reasonably necessary to
carry out the provisions or intent of this Agreement.
i. Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall
be considered one and the same instrument and shall become
effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each
of the parties and delivered to the other party. This Agreement
may be executed by facsimile signature and a facsimile signature
shall constitute an original for all purposes.
[Signature
page follows]
N-9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this
Agreement, or caused this Agreement to be duly executed, as of
the day and year first above written.
HIRSCH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Name: Larry Midland
EMPLOYEE
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
C. Zivney, Jr.
|
Robert C. Zivney, Jr.
Address:
18 MacKenzie Lane
Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679
[Signature
page to Zivney Employment Agreement]
N-10
Annex O
CHAPTER 13
OF THE CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE
§1300. Right
to Require Purchase Dissenting Shares
and Dissenting Shareholder Defined.
(a) If the approval of the outstanding shares
(Section 152) of a corporation is required for a
reorganization under subdivisions (a) and (b) or
subdivision (e) or (f) of Section 1201, each
shareholder of the corporation entitled to vote on the
transaction and each shareholder of a subsidiary corporation in
a short-form merger may, by complying with this chapter, require
the corporation in which the shareholder holds shares to
purchase for cash at their fair market value the shares owned by
the shareholder which are dissenting shares as defined in
subdivision (b). The fair market value shall be determined as of
the day before the first announcement of the terms of the
proposed reorganization or short-form merger, excluding any
appreciation or depreciation in consequence of the proposed
action, but adjusted for any stock split, reverse stock split,
or share dividend which becomes effective thereafter.
(b) As used in this chapter, dissenting shares
means shares which come within all of the following descriptions:
(1) Which were not immediately prior to the reorganization
or short-form merger either (A) listed on any national
securities exchange certified by the Commissioner of
Corporations under subdivision (o) of Section 25100 or
(B) listed on the National Market System of the NASDAQ
Stock Market, and the notice of meeting of shareholders to act
upon the reorganization summarizes this section and
Sections 1301, 1302, 1303 and 1304; provided, however, that
this provision does not apply to any shares with respect to
which there exists any restriction on transfer imposed by the
corporation or by any law or regulation; and provided, further,
that this provision does not apply to any class of shares
described in subparagraph (A) or (B) if demands for
payment are filed with respect to 5 percent or more of the
outstanding shares of that class.
(2) Which were outstanding on the date for the
determination of shareholders entitled to vote on the
reorganization and (A) were not voted in favor of the
reorganization or, (B) if described in subparagraph
(A) or (B) of paragraph (1) (without regard to the
provisos in that paragraph), were voted against the
reorganization, or which were held of record on the effective
date of a short-form merger; provided, however, that
subparagraph (A) rather than subparagraph (B) of this
paragraph applies in any case where the approval required by
Section 1201 is sought by written consent rather than at a
meeting.
(3) Which the dissenting shareholder has demanded that the
corporation purchase at their fair market value, in accordance
with Section 1301.
(4) Which the dissenting shareholder has submitted for
endorsement, in accordance with Section 1302.
(c) As used in this chapter, dissenting
shareholder means the recordholder of dissenting shares
and includes a transferee of record.
§1301. Demand
for Purchase.
(a) If, in the case of a reorganization, any shareholders
of a corporation have a right under Section 1300, subject
to compliance with paragraphs (3) and (4) of
subdivision (b) thereof, to require the corporation to
purchase their shares for cash, that corporation shall mail to
each such shareholder a notice of the approval of the
reorganization by its outstanding shares
(Section 152) within 10 days after the date of
that approval, accompanied by a copy of Sections 1300,
1302, 1303, and 1304 and this section, a statement of the price
determined by the corporation to represent the fair market value
of the dissenting shares, and a brief description of the
procedure to be followed if the shareholder desires to exercise
the shareholders right under those sections. The statement
of price constitutes an offer by the corporation to purchase at
the price stated any dissenting shares as defined in subdivision
(b) of Section 1300, unless they lose their status as
dissenting shares under Section 1309.
(b) Any shareholder who has a right to require the
corporation to purchase the shareholders shares for cash
under Section 1300, subject to compliance with paragraphs
(3) and (4) of subdivision (b) thereof, and who
desires the corporation to purchase shares shall make written
demand upon the corporation for the purchase of those shares and
payment to the shareholder in cash of their fair market value.
The demand is not effective for any purpose unless it is
received by the corporation or any transfer agent thereof
(1) in the case of shares described in clause (A) or
(B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of
Section 1300 (without regard to the provisos in that
paragraph), not later
O-1
than the date of the shareholders meeting to vote upon the
reorganization, or (2) in any other case within
30 days after the date on which the notice of the approval
by the outstanding shares pursuant to subdivision (a) or
the notice pursuant to subdivision (i) of Section 1110
was mailed to the shareholder.
(c) The demand shall state the number and class of the
shares held of record by the shareholder which the shareholder
demands that the corporation purchase and shall contain a
statement of what that shareholder claims to be the fair market
value of those shares as of the day before the announcement of
the proposed reorganization or short-form merger. The statement
of fair market value constitutes an offer by the shareholder to
sell the shares at that price.
§1302. Endorsement
of Shares.
Within 30 days after the date on which notice of the
approval by the outstanding shares or the notice pursuant to
subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the
shareholder, the shareholder shall submit to the corporation at
its principal office or at the office of any transfer agent
thereof, (a) if the shares are certificated securities, the
shareholders certificates representing any shares which
the shareholder demands that the corporation purchase, to be
stamped or endorsed with a statement that the shares are
dissenting shares or to be exchanged for certificates of
appropriate denomination so stamped or endorsed or (b) if
the shares are uncertificated securities, written notice of the
number of shares which the shareholder demands that the
corporation purchase. Upon subsequent transfers of the
dissenting shares on the books of the corporation, the new
certificates, initial transaction statement, and other written
statements issued therefor shall bear a like statement, together
with the name of the original dissenting holder of the shares.
§1303. Agreed
Price Time for Payment.
(a) If the corporation and the shareholder agree that the
shares are dissenting shares and agree upon the price of the
shares, the dissenting shareholder is entitled to the agreed
price with interest thereon at the legal rate on judgments from
the date of the agreement. Any agreements fixing the fair market
value of any dissenting shares as between the corporation and
the holders thereof shall be filed with the secretary of the
corporation.
(b) Subject to the provisions of Section 1306, payment
of the fair market value of dissenting shares shall be made
within 30 days after the amount thereof has been agreed or
within 30 days after any statutory or contractual
conditions to the reorganization are satisfied, whichever is
later, and in the case of certificated securities, subject to
surrender of the certificates therefor, unless provided
otherwise by agreement.
§1304. Dissenters
Action to Enforce Payment.
(a) If the corporation denies that the shares are
dissenting shares, or the corporation and the shareholder fail
to agree upon the fair market value of the shares, then the
shareholder demanding purchase of such shares as dissenting
shares or any interested corporation, within six months after
the date on which notice of the approval by the outstanding
shares (Section 152) or notice pursuant to subdivision
(i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the shareholder, but
not thereafter, may file a complaint in the superior court of
the proper county praying the court to determine whether the
shares are dissenting shares or the fair market value of the
dissenting shares or both or may intervene in any action pending
on such a complaint.
(b) Two or more dissenting shareholders may join as
plaintiffs or be joined as defendants in any such action and two
or more such actions may be consolidated.
(c) On the trial of the action, the court shall determine
the issues. If the status of the shares as dissenting shares is
in issue, the court shall first determine that issue. If the
fair market value of the dissenting shares is in issue, the
court shall determine, or shall appoint one or more impartial
appraisers to determine, the fair market value of the shares.
§1305. Appraisers
Report Payment Costs.
(a) If the court appoints an appraiser or appraisers, they
shall proceed forthwith to determine the fair market value per
share. Within the time fixed by the court, the appraisers, or a
majority of them, shall make and file a report in the office of
the clerk of the court. Thereupon, on the motion of any party,
the report shall be submitted to the court and considered on
such evidence as the court considers relevant. If the court
finds the report reasonable, the court may confirm it.
O-2
(b) If a majority of the appraisers appointed fail to make
and file a report within 10 days from the date of their
appointment or within such further time as may be allowed by the
court or the report is not confirmed by the court, the court
shall determine the fair market value of the dissenting shares.
(c) Subject to the provisions of Section 1306,
judgment shall be rendered against the corporation for payment
of an amount equal to the fair market value of each dissenting
share multiplied by the number of dissenting shares which any
dissenting shareholder who is a party, or who has intervened, is
entitled to require the corporation to purchase, with interest
thereon at the legal rate from the date on which judgment was
entered.
(d) Any such judgment shall be payable forthwith with
respect to uncertificated securities and, with respect to
certificated securities, only upon the endorsement and delivery
to the corporation of the certificates for the shares described
in the judgment. Any party may appeal from the judgment.
(e) The costs of the action, including reasonable
compensation to the appraisers to be fixed by the court, shall
be assessed or apportioned as the court considers equitable,
but, if the appraisal exceeds the price offered by the
corporation, the corporation shall pay the costs (including in
the discretion of the court attorneys fees, fees of expert
witnesses and interest at the legal rate on judgments from the
date of compliance with Sections 1300, 1301 and 1302 if the
value awarded by the court for the shares is more than
125 percent of the price offered by the corporation under
subdivision (a) of Section 1301).
§1306. Dissenting
Shareholders Status as Creditor.
To the extent that the provisions of Chapter 5 prevent the
payment to any holders of dissenting shares of their fair market
value, they shall become creditors of the corporation for the
amount thereof together with interest at the legal rate on
judgments until the date of payment, but subordinate to all
other creditors in any liquidation proceeding, such debt to be
payable when permissible under the provisions of Chapter 5.
§1307. Dividends
Paid as Credit Against Payment.
Cash dividends declared and paid by the corporation upon the
dissenting shares after the date of approval of the
reorganization by the outstanding shares
(Section 152) and prior to payment for the shares by
the corporation shall be credited against the total amount to be
paid by the corporation therefor.
§1308. Continuing
Rights and Privileges of Dissenting Shareholders.
Except as expressly limited in this chapter, holders of
dissenting shares continue to have all the rights and privileges
incident to their shares, until the fair market value of their
shares is agreed upon or determined.
A dissenting shareholder may not withdraw a demand for payment
unless the corporation consents thereto.
§1309. Termination
of Dissenting Shareholder Status.
Dissenting shares lose their status as dissenting shares and the
holders thereof cease to be dissenting shareholders and cease to
be entitled to require the corporation to purchase their shares
upon the happening of any of the following:
(a) The corporation abandons the reorganization. Upon
abandonment of the reorganization, the corporation shall pay on
demand to any dissenting shareholder who has initiated
proceedings in good faith under this chapter all necessary
expenses incurred in such proceedings and reasonable
attorneys fees.
(b) The shares are transferred prior to their submission
for endorsement in accordance with Section 1302 or are
surrendered for conversion into shares of another class in
accordance with the articles.
(c) The dissenting shareholder and the corporation do not
agree upon the status of the shares as dissenting shares or upon
the purchase price of the shares, and neither files a complaint
or intervenes in a pending action as provided in
Section 1304, within six months after the date on which
notice of the approval by the outstanding shares or notice
pursuant to subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was mailed
to the shareholder.
(d) The dissenting shareholder, with the consent of the
corporation, withdraws the shareholders demand for
purchase of the dissenting shares.
O-3
§1310. Suspension
of Proceedings for Payment Pending Litigation.
If litigation is instituted to test the sufficiency or
regularity of the votes of the shareholders in authorizing a
reorganization, any proceedings under Sections 1304 and
1305 shall be suspended until final determination of such
litigation.
§1311. Exempt
Shares.
This chapter, except Section 1312, does not apply to
classes of shares whose terms and provisions specifically set
forth the amount to be paid in respect to such shares in the
event of a reorganization or merger.
§1312. Attacking
Validity of Reorganization or Merger.
(a) No shareholder of a corporation who has a right under
this chapter to demand payment of cash for the shares held by
the shareholder shall have any right at law or in equity to
attack the validity of the reorganization or short-form merger,
or to have the reorganization or short-form merger set aside or
rescinded, except in an action to test whether the number of
shares required to authorize or approve the reorganization have
been legally voted in favor thereof; but any holder of shares of
a class whose terms and provisions specifically set forth the
amount to be paid in respect to them in the event of a
reorganization or short-form merger is entitled to payment in
accordance with those terms and provisions or, if the principal
terms of the reorganization are approved pursuant to subdivision
(b) of Section 1202, is entitled to payment in
accordance with the terms and provisions of the approved
reorganization.
(b) If one of the parties to a reorganization or short-form
merger is directly or indirectly controlled by, or under common
control with, another party to the reorganization or short-form
merger, subdivision (a) shall not apply to any shareholder
of such party who has not demanded payment of cash for such
shareholders shares pursuant to this chapter; but if the
shareholder institutes any action to attack the validity of the
reorganization or short-form merger or to have the
reorganization or short-form merger set aside or rescinded, the
shareholder shall not thereafter have any right to demand
payment of cash for the shareholders shares pursuant to
this chapter. The court in any action attacking the validity of
the reorganization or short-form merger or to have the
reorganization or short-form merger set aside or rescinded shall
not restrain or enjoin the consummation of the transaction
except upon 10 days prior notice to the corporation
and upon a determination by the court that clearly no other
remedy will adequately protect the complaining shareholder or
the class of shareholders of which such shareholder is a member.
(c) If one of the parties to a reorganization or short-form
merger is directly or indirectly controlled by, or under common
control with, another party to the reorganization or short-form
merger, in any action to attack the validity of the
reorganization or short-form merger or to have the
reorganization or short-form merger set aside or rescinded,
(1) a party to a reorganization or short-form merger which
controls another party to the reorganization or short-form
merger shall have the burden of proving that the transaction is
just and reasonable as to the shareholders of the controlled
party, and (2) a person who controls two or more parties to
a reorganization shall have the burden of proving that the
transaction is just and reasonable as to the shareholders of any
party so controlled.
§1313. Conversion
Deemed to Constitute Reorganization for Purposes of
Chapter.
A conversion pursuant to Chapter 11.5 (commencing with
Section 1150) shall be deemed to constitute a
reorganization for purposes of applying the provisions of this
chapter, in accordance with and to the extent provided in
Section 1159.
O-4