x |
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 27, 2009.
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934.
|
For
the transition period from ______ to _____.
|
NEW
YORK
|
13-5549348
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
In
Company)
|
||
140
58th
Street, Suite 8E
|
||
Brooklyn,
NY 11220
|
(718)
492-9673
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Issuer’s
Telephone Number,
|
|
Including
Area Code)
|
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
|
(do
not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
PART
II
|
4 | |
ITEM
9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
4 |
PART
IV
|
5 | |
ITEM
15.
|
EXHIBITS
|
5 |
SIGNATURES
|
6 |
|
Evaluations
of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
|
|
As
of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). In designing
and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management
recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls
and procedures.
|
|
Based
upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the year to
ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we
file and submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
Commission’s rules and
forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely
discussions regarding disclosure.
|
|
|
Under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an
assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting based upon the framework in Internal Control – Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission. Based upon assessment, our management concluded
that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of
March 27, 2009.
|
|
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
|
|
Our
management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of
our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or
persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of
directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that:
|
|
(i)
|
pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
Company;
|
|
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
(continued)
|
|
Management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of March 27, 2009. In making this evaluation,
management used the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework, our management has concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
March 27, 2009.
|
|
This
report does not include an attestation report of our independent
registered public accounting firm regarding our internal control over
financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by
our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the
SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual
report.
|
|
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
|
|
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
|
|
There
was no change in our system of internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our fiscal
year ended March 27, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of
Controls
|
We
do not expect that internal controls over financial reporting will prevent
all errors or all instances of fraud. A control system, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the
design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to
their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems,
no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control
issues and instances of fraud, if any, within its company have been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments
in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of
simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls
is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and any design may not succeed in achieving its stated goals under
all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of
compliance with
|
|
policies
or procedures. Because of the inherent limitation of a cost-effective
control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected.
|
|
Other
Information Related to Internal
Controls
|
|
Historically,
the Company has relied upon the entire Board of Directors in appointing
the Company’s independent auditors and reviewing the financial condition
and statements of the Company. Given the relatively small size
of the Company’s operations and revenues, the Board has not believed that
appointing an independent committee was a
necessity.
|
Item
15.
|
Exhibits
|
|
Exhibits
filed with Form 10-K:
|
31.1 Certifications
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 17 CFR
240.13a-14(a) or 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a) pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
Certifications of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 17
CFR 240.13a-14(a) or 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a) pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
Certifications by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 17 CFR 240.15d-14(b) and Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
IEH
CORPORATION
|
||
By:
|
/s/
Michael Offerman
|
|
|
Michael
Offerman
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
/s/ Michael
Offerman
|
May
11, 2010
|
|
Michael
Offerman, Chairman of the
|
||
Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
||
/s/ Robert
Knoth
|
May
11, 2010
|
|
Robert
Knoth, Secretary and
|
||
Treasurer;
Chief Financial Officer,
|
||
Controller
and Principal Accounting Officer
|
||
/s/ Murray
Sennet
|
May
11, 2010
|
|
Murray
Sennet, Director
|
||
/s/
Alan Gottlieb
|
May
11, 2010
|
|
Alan
Gottlieb, Director
|
||
/s/
Gerald E. Chafetz
|
May
11, 2010
|
|
Gerald
E. Chafetz
|
||