SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 8-K

                                ----------------

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


         Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): July 1, 2003

                          THE SPORTS CLUB COMPANY, INC.
           -----------------------------------------------------------
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

                                    Delaware
                                 --------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)


         1-13290                                        95-4479735
         ----------                                   --------------
(Commission File Number)                    (IRS Employer Identification Number)


                     11100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 300
                          Los Angeles, California 90025
                      -------------------------------------
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                  Registrant's telephone number, including area
                               code: 310-479-5200

                                 Not Applicable
             ------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

                           Index of Exhibits on Page 2






Item 5. Other Matters

     A purported  shareholder  class  action  lawsuit has been filed in Delaware
Chancery Court against the Company and its principal  shareholders and directors
alleging,  among other  things,  that the  individual  defendants  had  violated
certain  fiduciary  duties owed the  minority  shareholders  by  announcing  the
principal  shareholders' offer to cash out the minority shareholders in a "going
private"  transaction at a price of $3.00 per share.  The complaint also asserts
that the defendants  were using the proposed going private  transaction to avoid
disclosure  of  accounting  problems  that  resulted in the  restatement  of the
Company's  financial  statements,  which  were  filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on June 26, 2003.  The plaintiffs are seeking to enjoin the
completion of the going private transaction, damages and attorneys' fees.

Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits

(a) Financial Statements

     Not Applicable

(b) Pro Forma Financial Information

     Not Applicable

(c) Exhibits

     99.1 Press Release Dated July 3, 2003.

     99.2 Class  Action  Complaint  filed in court of  Chancery  of the State of
Delaware.





                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Dated: July 9, 2003                         THE SPORTS CLUB COMPANY, INC.


                                             By:      /s/ Timothy O'Brien
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                      Timothy O'Brien,
                                                      Chief Financial Officer





                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  NEWS RELEASE



For Immediate Release                                     CONTACT:
                                                          Rex Licklider, Co-CEO
                                                          (310) 479-5200


LOS ANGELES,  CA (July 3, 2003) -- The Sports Club  Company,  Inc.  (AMEX:  SCY)
announced today that a purported shareholder class action lawsuit had been filed
in Delaware  Chancery  Court  Tuesday  against  the  Company  and its  principal
shareholders  and directors  alleging,  among other things,  that the individual
defendants had violated certain fiduciary duties owed the minority  shareholders
by  announcing  the  principal  shareholders'  offer  to cash  out the  minority
shareholders in a "going private" transaction at a price of $3.00 per share. The
complaint also asserts that the defendants were using the proposed going private
transaction  to avoid  disclosure  of  accounting  problems that resulted in the
restatement  of the Company's  financial  statements,  which were filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  last week.  The  plaintiffs are seeking to
enjoin the completion of the going private  transaction,  damages and attorneys'
fees.

"The complaint is wholly without merit and reflects a complete  misunderstanding
of the status of the proposal, in that it seeks to enjoin a transaction that has
not  been  approved  by  the  independent  special  committee  of the  Board  of
Directors, " stated Rex A. Licklider,  co-chief executive officer and one of the
named defendants in the lawsuit.  "Furthermore, the Company's restated financial
statements do not materially  change its reported  results of operations for the
periods  covered by them and are not expected to have any impact on the proposed
going private transaction, which was initiated before management became aware of
the issues that caused the restatement," Mr. Licklider  continued.  "Needless to
say, we intend to vigorously defend what we consider to be a frivolous action."

The Sports  Club  Company,  Inc.,  based in Los  Angeles,  California,  owns and
operates luxury sports and fitness  complexes  nationwide  under the brand name,
"The Sports Club/LA."

Certain statements in this press release constitute "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the Private Securities  Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that
involve a number of risks and uncertainties.  Forward-looking statements,  which
are based on management's current  expectations,  are generally  identifiable by
the use of such  terms as "may,"  "will,"  "expects,"  "believes,"  and  similar
expressions and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties  that could
cause actual  results to differ  materially  from those  described in this press
release.  These  forward-looking  statements  only  speak as of the date of this
press release. The Sports Club Company expressly disclaims any obligation



to release  publicly  any  updates or  revisions  to any of the  forward-looking
statements  contained herein to reflect any change in management's  expectations
with regard  thereto or any change in events,  conditions  or  circumstances  on
which any such forward-looking statement is based.

                                       ###







                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                          IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

RONALD FRANKEL, on behalf of
himself and all other similarly
situated,

                    Plaintiffs,

                          v.                               C.A. No. 20396-NC

THE SPORTS CLUB C OMPANY, INC.,
D. MICHAEL TALLA, REX A.
LICKLIDER, MILLENNIUM PARTNERS
LLC, KAYNE ANDERSON CAPITAL
ADVISORS L.P., NANETTE PATTEE
FRANCINI, BRIAN J. COLLINS,
ANDREW L. TURNER, GEORGE J.
VASILAKOS and CHARLES A. NORRIS,

                     Defendants.

                             CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                             ----------------------

     Plaintiff  Ronald  Frankel  ("Plaintiff"),  by his  attorneys  Klett Rooney
Lieber & Schorling and Beatie and Osborn LLP, alleges as follows:
     1. Plaintiff is, and has been at all relevant times, the owner of shares of
the  common  stock  of The  Sports  Club  Company,  Inc.  ("Sports  Club" or the
"Company").
     2. The  transaction  at issue in this lawsuit is a proposed  offer from: D.
Michael Talla,  Chairman of the Board, Co-Chief Executive Officer, and principal
shareholder  of Sports  Club;  Rex A.  Licklider,  Vice  Chairman  of the Board,
Co-Chief Executive Officer, and principal  shareholder of Sports Cub; Millennium
Partners LLC,  principal  shareholder  of Sports Club;  Kayne  Anderson  Capital
Advisors L.P., principal  shareholder of Sports Club; and, Palisade Concentrated
Equity  Partnership,  L.P.  to  acquire  100%  ownership  of  Sports  Cub  at an
unreasonably low price per share in order to mask accounting  improprieties as a
result of the  Company's May 23, 2003  announcement  that it will be required to
restate its financial statements for prior periods.


     3. Defendant Sports Club is a corporation  organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Delaware;  maintains  its  principal  corporate  offices at
11100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 300, Los Angeles, California 90025; and owns
and operates luxury sports and fitness complexes nationwide, primarily under the
brand name "The Sports Club/LA".
     4. Defendant D. Michael Talla ("Talla")  currently owns  approximately  4.2
million  shares (23%) of common  stock of Sports Club (with shared  voting power
for approximately 6.3 million shares).
     5. Defendant Rex A. Licklider  ("Licklider") and the Licklider Living Trust
currently own  approximately  1.8 million shares (10%) of common stock of Sports
Club and 2,000  shares of series C  Convertible  Preferred  Stock of Sports Club
which is convertible into 666,666 shares of common stock of Sports Club.
     6. Defendant  Millennium Partners LLC ("Millennium") is a limited liability
company  organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York; has its
principal place of business at 1995 Broadway, New York, New York 10023; together
with its affiliates,  currently owns  approximately  6.1 million shares (33%) of
common stock of Sports Club;  and has the  authority to designate  one member of
the Board of Directors of Sports Club.
     7. Defendant Kayne Anderson Capital  Advisors L.P. ("Kayne  Anderson") is a
California  limited  partnership;  has its  principal  place of  business at 180
Avenue of the Stars, Second Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067; currently owns
approximately  seven hundred  ninety  thousand  (790,000)  shares (4%) of common
stock of Sports Club;  currently  owns Series B Convertible  Preferred  Stock of
Sports Cub which  carries  voting  rights and is  convertible  into 3.5  million
shares of common stock of Sports Club;  and has the  authority to designate  one
member of the Board of Directors of Sports Club.
     8.  Defendant  Brian J.  Collins is a member of the Board of  Directors  of
Sports Club and was designated as such by Millennium.
     9.  Defendant  Charles A. Norris is a member of the Board of  Directors  of
Sports Cub and was designated as such by Kayne Anderson.
     10.  Defendants  Nanette  Pattee  Francini,  Andrew L. Turner and George J.
Vasilakos are the remaining members of the Board of Directors of Sports Club.


     11.  Defendants D. Michael Talla,  Rex A.  Licklider,  Millennium and Kayne
Anderson are together controlling shareholders of Sports Club.
     12. By virtue of their positions as officers, directors, and/or controlling
shareholders  of Sports Club,  the defendants owe plaintiff and the other Sports
Club shareholders the highest  obligation of good faith,  fair dealing,  loyalty
and due care.
                            CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
                            ------------------------
     13.  Plaintiff  brings  this action on behalf of himself  and,  pursuant to
Delaware law, as a shareholders'  class action on behalf of all owners of Sports
Club common stock and their successors in interest.
     14.  This  action  is  properly  maintainable  as a  class  action  for the
following reasons:
     (a)  exclusive of defendants,  the class is so numerous that joinder of all
          members is  impracticable  (more  than 5 million  shares of Sports Cub
          common  stock are held by hundreds if not  thousands  of  shareholders
          throughout the country);
     (b)  questions  of law and fact are common to the class,  including,  inter
          alia, the following:
          (i)  did  defendants  breach the fiduciary and other common law duties
               they owe to plaintiff and the members of the class;
          (ii) are  defendants  attempting to acquire  Sports Club and eliminate
               its  public  shareholders  without  adequate  disclosure  and  in
               violation of the laws of the State of Delaware;
          (iii)were the  defendants  able to  negotiate  at  arms-length  and in
               good-faith on behalf of Sports Club's public shareholders; and
          (iv) is the class entitled to injunctive relief or damages as a result
               of the wrongful conduct of the defendants.
     (c)  plaintiff  is committed  to  prosecuting  this action and has retained
          competent counsel experienced in litigation of this nature;
     (d)  plaintiff's  claims are  similar to those of the other  members of the
          class; and
     (e)  plaintiff has no interests that are adverse to the class.


     15. The prosecution of separate actions by individual  members of the class
would create the risk of  inconsistent or varying  adjudications  for individual
members of the class and of establishing  incompatible  standards of conduct for
defendants.
     16. Conflicting  adjudications for individual members of the class might as
a practical  matter be  dispositive  of the  interests of the other  members not
parities to the adjudications or substantially impair or impede their ability to
protect their interests.
                                      FACTS
                                      -----
     17. On April 4, 2003,  defendants  Talla,  Licklider,  Millennium and Kayne
Anderson, along with Palisade Concentrated Equity Partnership, L.P., submitted a
letter to the Board of Directors of Sports Club  proposing to acquire all of the
outstanding shares of common stock of Sports Club for $3.00 per share.
     18.  Shortly  thereafter,  on May 23, 2003,  the Company  announced that it
would delay the filing of its first quarter  financial  results for 2003 because
of  recently  discovered  accounting  irregularities  requiring  restatement  of
certain financial statements.
     19.  According to the  Company's  announcement,  during the course of their
review of Sports Club's first quarter results, the Company's auditors discovered
certain accounting irregularities,  specifically the Company's failure to record
private  training  revenues in accordance  with  Generally  Accepted  Accounting
Principles ("GAAP").
     20. On May 23,  2003,  the  Company's  stock was  immediately  halted  from
trading by the United States Securities and Exchange  Commission,  and continues
to be suspended  from trading.  As of June 7, 2003,  Sports Club has yet to file
its first  quarter  financial  results  specifying  the  amount of the  proposed
restatements,  the  periods  for  which  financial  statements  will  have to be
restated, and specifically what accounts will require restatement.
     21.  Among other  reasons,  the  proposed  transaction  to take the Company
private was instituted by the Company's insiders in order to avoid disclosure of
the  nature  and  scope  of the  accounting  irregularities  perpetrated  by the
Company's management.
     22. The proposed  purchase  price does not  represent the true value of the
assets and future  prospects  of Sports  Club,  which owns and  operates  luxury
health and fitness clubs in California,  Massachusetts, New York and Washington,
D.C.


     23. In addition,  by timing the  going-private  offer to coincide  with the
announcement of the restatement,  the insiders are able to take advantage of the
market's  uncertainty  and fear  generated by the  announcement  to purchase the
Company's shares at a depressed price.
     24.  Because  defendants  Talla,  Licklider,  Millennium and Kayne Anderson
stand on both sides of the proposed transaction,  they have an inherent conflict
of interest and are therefore  attempting to purchase Sports Club's shares at an
unfair price, under unfair terms, and without complete disclosure at the expense
of the public shareholders.
     25. The  proposed  transaction  to take Sports  Club  private at the stated
price  is  being  conducted  in  breach  of the  fiduciary  duties  owed  by the
defendants to plaintiff and Sports Club's other shareholders.
     26. The proposed  purchase  price of $3.00 per share does not represent the
true value of the assets and future  prospects  underlying  each share of Sports
Club.
     27. For  example,  Sports  Club's  revenue for the year ended  December 31,
2002,  rose 20 percent  from the prior  year to  approximately  $122.5  million.
Sports Club's 20% revenue growth rate is substantially  higher than the industry
average of approximately 5.8%.
     28. Sports Club reported total assets of more than $186 million, or $10 per
share, at the end of 2002.
     29. In 2002 and 2001,  Sports Club opened five large new health and fitness
clubs and therefore incurred a high level of pre-opening  expenses.  Since 2001,
the  pre-opening  expenses  have  markedly  declined  and  the  Company  is  now
positioned  to recognize  the added revenue and profits to be generated by these
new health clubs.  In 2001,  the Company  incurred  $5.9 million in  pre-opening
expenses; in 2003 pre-opening expenses amounted to only $130,000.
     30.  Sports  Club is a viable  business  worth far more  than the  proposed
purchase price of $3.00 per share, and defendants are therefore  breaching their
fiduciary duty by permitting the sale of the Company at that price.




                                     COUNT I

                           Breach of Fiduciary Duties
                             Against the Defendants

     31.  Plaintiff  repeats and realleges  each and every  allegation as if set
forth here in full.
     32. The proposed  offer does not represent the true value of the assets and
future  prospects of Sports Club,  does not adequately  reflect the value of the
Sports Club common stock,  and was arranged in violation of the fiduciary duties
of Sports Clubs' officers, directors, and controlling shareholders.
     33.  Defendants  Talla,  Licklider,  Millennium  and  Kayne  Anderson  have
breached  their  fiduciary  duty to  plaintiff  and the class  because  they are
attempting to use their combined  position as controlling  shareholders in order
to acquire  the  outstanding  shares of Sports  Club at an unfair  price,  under
unfair  terms,  through  improper  means and with  inadequate  disclosure to the
public shareholders of Sports Club.
     34. The individual  defendants have a duty to act  independently to protect
the interests of Sport Club's public stockholders; must ensure that no conflicts
of  interest  exist  between  them and the  interests  of Sports  Club's  public
stockholders;  and if a conflict exists,  must ensure all conflicted  issues are
independently   resolved  in  the  best   interest  of  Sports   Club's   public
stockholders.
     35. Defendants have breached their fiduciary duties to plaintiff and others
similarly  situated by not renegotiating  and/or  reformulating the terms of the
offer.
     36.  As it is  presently  constituted,  the  proposed  offer is  unfair  to
plaintiffs and others similarly  situated,  and is designed to enrich defendants
Talla, Licklider,  Millennium and Kayne Anderson at the expense of plaintiff and
the other class members.
     37. Absent injunctive relief for the benefit of the Company,  plaintiff and
Sports Clubs' other public stockholders will irreparably harmed.
     38. Plaintiff and the class have no adequate remedy at law.




     WHEREFORE,  plaintiff  demands judgment against the defendants  jointly and
severally, as follows:
     (1) declaring this action to be a class action and certifying  plaintiff as
the class representative and his counsel as class counsel;
     (2) enjoining,  preliminarily  and  permanently,  the proposed  transaction
between  Sports  Club and  Talla,  Licklider,  Millennium,  Kayne  Anderson  and
Palisade Concentrated Equity Partnership, L.P.;
     (3) in the event that the transaction is consummated  prior to the entry of
this Court's  final  judgment,  rescinding  it or awarding to plaintiff  and the
class recessional damages;
     (4) directing that defendants account to plaintiff and the other members of
the class for all  damages  caused by them and  account  for all profits and any
special  benefits  obtained  as a result of their  breaches  of their  fiduciary
duties;
     (5)  awarding to  plaintiff  the costs and  disbursements  of this  action,
including  a  reasonable  allowance  for the fees and  expenses  of  plaintiff's
attorneys and experts; and
     (6)  granting  plaintiff  and the other  members  of the class any  further
relief the Court deems just and proper.
                                          KLETT ROONEY LIEBER & SCHORLING

OF COUNSEL:                               /s/ Daniel B. Rath
                                          ---------------------
BEATIE AND OSBORN LLP                     Daniel B. Rath, Esq.
Daniel A. Osborn                          Rebecca L. Butcher, Esq.
Eduard Korsinsky                          The Brandywine Building
521 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor              1000 West Street, Suite 1410
New York, New York 10175                  Wilmington, Delaware 19801
(212) 888-9000                            (302) 552-4200

Dated: July 30, 2003                      Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class