prem14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
þ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
o |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Hiland Partners, LP
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
o |
|
No fee required. |
þ |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
Common units representing limited partner
interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
3,986,659 common
units representing limited partner interests (including
15,750 restricted common units held by non-employee
directors)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
$7.75 per common unit
(the price per common unit negotiated in the transaction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
$30,896,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
$1,724, computed in
accordance with Exchange Act Rule 0-11(c)(1) and
Section 14(g) of the Exchange Act by multiplying the proposed
aggregate value of the transaction by 0.0000558
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSED
MERGERS YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
Dear Common Unitholders of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings:
As a holder of common units representing limited partner
interests (common units) in Hiland Partners, LP
(Hiland Partners) or Hiland Holdings GP, LP
(Hiland Holdings, and together with Hiland Partners,
the Hiland Companies), respectively, you are
cordially invited to attend a special meeting of the unitholders
of the Hiland Company in which you own common units. The
attached joint proxy statement includes information about the
matters to be acted on at the special meeting of each of the
Hiland Companies, including at any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
At the special meeting of unitholders of Hiland Partners, the
holders of common units of Hiland Partners will be asked to
consider and vote on a proposal to approve (a) the
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 1, 2009 (the
Hiland Partners merger agreement) among Hiland
Partners, Hiland Partners GP, LLC (the general partner of Hiland
Partners), HH GP Holding, LLC (an affiliate of Harold Hamm and
Hiland Partners (Parent)), and HLND MergerCo, LLC (a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent formed to effect the merger
(HLND Merger Sub)), which agreement provides, among
other things, that HLND Merger Sub will merge with and into
Hiland Partners, with Hiland Partners continuing as the
surviving entity (the Hiland Partners merger), and
(b) the Hiland Partners merger. At the effective time of
the Hiland Partners merger, each common unit of Hiland Partners
(other than common units of Hiland Partners held by Hiland
Holdings and any restricted common units held by officers and
employees of Hiland Partners) will be converted into the right
to receive $7.75 in cash (the Hiland Partners merger
consideration). The Hiland Partners merger consideration
will be paid without interest and reduced by any applicable tax
withholding.
At the special meeting of unitholders of Hiland Holdings, the
holders of common units of Hiland Holdings will be asked to
consider and vote on a proposal to approve (a) the
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 1, 2009 (the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement) among Hiland
Holdings, Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC (the general partner
of Hiland Holdings), Parent (an affiliate of Harold Hamm and the
sole member of the general partner of Hiland Holdings), and HPGP
MergerCo, LLC (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent formed to
effect the merger (HPGP Merger Sub and, together
with HLND Merger Sub, the Merger Subs)), which
agreement provides, among other things, that HPGP Merger Sub
will merge with and into Hiland Holdings, with Hiland Holdings
continuing as the surviving entity (the Hiland Holdings
merger) and (b) the Hiland Holdings merger. At the
effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger, each common unit
of Hiland Holdings (other than common units of Hiland Holdings
held by Harold Hamm, Continental Gas Holdings, Inc., an
affiliate of Mr. Hamm (Continental Gas), the
Harold Hamm DST Trust and the Harold Hamm HJ Trust (the
Hamm family trusts) and any restricted common units
held by officers and employees of Hiland Holdings) will be
converted into the right to receive $2.40 in cash (the
Hiland Holdings merger consideration). The Hiland
Holdings merger consideration will be paid without interest and
reduced by any applicable tax withholding.
As a result and upon completion of the mergers, both Hiland
Companies will be privately owned by Harold Hamm, certain of his
affiliates and the Hamm family trusts. A copy of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement is included as Annex A, and a
copy of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is included as
Annex D to the attached joint proxy statement.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Approval of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger
requires the affirmative vote of holders of (a) a majority
of the outstanding common units of Hiland Partners, other than
Hiland Partners common units held by the general partner of
Hiland Partners, its
affiliates (including Hiland Holdings) and the directors and
officers of Hiland Partners general partner, entitled to
vote thereon voting as a class (whom we refer to as the
Hiland Partners public unitholders), and
(b) holders of a majority of the outstanding subordinated
units of Hiland Partners entitled to vote thereon voting as a
class. Approval of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
Hiland Holdings merger requires the affirmative vote of
(a) holders of a majority of the outstanding common units
of Hiland Holdings entitled to vote thereon voting as a class,
and (b) holders of a majority of the outstanding common
units of Hiland Holdings, other than Hiland Holdings common
units held by Harold Hamm, his affiliates (including Continental
Gas), the Hamm family trusts and the directors and officers of
the general partner of Hiland Holdings (whom we refer to as the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders), entitled to
vote thereon voting as a class. The obligations of Parent and
the applicable Merger Sub to complete a Hiland Company merger
are conditioned upon, among other things, the concurrent
completion of the other Hiland Company merger. Parent and the
applicable Merger Sub may waive the condition requiring the
concurrent completion of both Hiland Company mergers under
limited circumstances, but is under no obligation to do so.
Hiland Partners will hold a special meeting
on , 2009
at , local time,
at . Hiland Holdings will hold a
special meeting on , 2009
at , local time,
at . Whether or not you plan to
attend your meeting, to ensure your common units are represented
at the meeting, please complete and submit the enclosed proxy
card as soon as possible or transmit your voting instructions by
using the telephone or Internet procedures described on your
proxy card. If your common units are held in street
name, please instruct your broker or bank how to vote your
common units.
The Conflicts Committee of the Board of Directors of the general
partner of Hiland Partners (which we refer to as the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee), consisting of
two independent directors, has unanimously determined that the
Hiland Partners merger agreement is advisable, fair to, and in
the best interests of, Hiland Partners and the Hiland Partners
public unitholders and approved the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the Hiland Partners merger. The Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of the
general partner of Hiland Partners (which we refer to as the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors) that the Hiland
Partners Board of Directors approve the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the Hiland Partners merger. In determining to make
its recommendation to the Hiland Partners Board of Directors,
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee considered, among other
things, the opinion of Jefferies & Company, Inc., the
financial advisor to the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, to
the effect that, as of the date of its opinion, the cash merger
consideration of $7.75 per common unit to be received by the
Hiland Partners public unitholders pursuant to the Hiland
Partners merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of
view, to the Hiland Partners public unitholders. The opinion of
Jefferies & Company, Inc. is subject to the
assumptions, limitations and qualifications set forth in that
opinion, which is included as Annex C in the attached joint
proxy statement.
The Hiland Partners Board of Directors, after considering
various factors, including the unanimous determination and
recommendation of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee,
determined that the Hiland Partners merger agreement is
advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland
Partners and the Hiland Partners public unitholders and approved
the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger. Accordingly, the Hiland Partners Board of Directors
and the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee both recommend that
the Hiland Partners public unitholders vote in favor of the
approval of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland
Partners merger.
The Conflicts Committee of the Board of Directors of the general
partner of Hiland Holdings (which we refer to as the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee), consisting of
two independent directors, has unanimously determined that the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement is advisable, fair to, and in
the best interests of, Hiland Holdings and the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders and approved the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger. The Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of the
general partner of Hiland Holdings (which we refer to as the
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors) that the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors approve the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger. In determining to make
its recommendation to the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors,
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee considered, among other
things, the opinion of Barclays Capital Inc., the financial
advisor to the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, to the
effect that, as of the date of its opinion, the cash merger
consideration of $2.40 per common unit offered to
the Hiland Holdings public unitholders pursuant to the Hiland
Holdings merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders. The opinion of Barclays
Capital Inc. is subject to the assumptions, limitations and
qualifications set forth in that opinion, which is included as
Annex F in the attached joint proxy statement.
The Hiland Holdings Board of Directors, after considering
various factors including the unanimous determination and
recommendation of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee,
determined that the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is
advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland
Holdings and the Hiland Holdings public unitholders and approved
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
merger. Accordingly, the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
and the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee both recommend that
the Hiland Holdings public unitholders vote in favor of the
approval of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland
Holdings merger.
The attached joint proxy statement provides you with detailed
information about the merger agreements and the mergers. We urge
you to read the entire joint proxy statement carefully,
following which you are asked to return your proxy at your
earliest convenience.
If you have any questions or need assistance voting your units,
please call , which is assisting each of
the Hiland Companies, toll-free at .
Sincerely,
|
|
|
John T. McNabb, II
Chairman of the Conflicts Committee
of the Board of Directors of
Hiland Partners GP, LLC,
the general partner of Hiland Partners, LP
|
|
Bobby B. Lyle
Chairman of the Conflicts Committee
of the Board of Directors of
Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC,
the general partner of Hiland Holdings GP, LP
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of this
transaction, or passed upon the fairness or merits of this
transaction or the adequacy or accuracy of the attached joint
proxy statement. Any contrary representation is a criminal
offense.
The attached joint proxy statement is
dated , 2009 and is first being
mailed to unitholders on or about ,
2009.
Hiland
Partners, LP
205 West Maple,
Suite 1100
Enid, Oklahoma 73701
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
UNITHOLDERS
To Be Held On
To the Holders of Common Units of Hiland Partners, LP:
We will hold a special meeting of the holders of common units
representing limited partner interests (common
units) in Hiland Partners, LP (Hiland
Partners) on , 2009
at , local time,
at . The purpose of the special
meeting is:
1. To consider and vote on a proposal to approve
(a) the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 1,
2009 (the Hiland Partners merger agreement) among
Hiland Partners, Hiland Partners GP, LLC (the general partner of
Hiland Partners), HH GP Holding, LLC (an affiliate of Harold
Hamm and Hiland Partners (Parent)), and HLND
MergerCo, LLC (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent formed to
effect the merger (HLND Merger Sub)), which
agreement provides, among other things, that HLND Merger Sub
will merge with and into Hiland Partners, with Hiland Partners
continuing as the surviving entity (the Hiland Partners
merger) and (b) the Hiland Partners merger.
2. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting.
Only holders of Hiland Partners common units at the close of
business on , 2009, the record date
established for the special meeting, are entitled to notice of,
and to vote at, the special meeting. A complete list of
unitholders entitled to vote at the special meeting will be
available for examination at Hiland Partners headquarters,
205 West Maple, Suite 1100, Enid, Oklahoma 73701,
after , 2009 and at the special
meeting.
The obligations of Parent and HLND Merger Sub to complete the
Hiland Partners merger are conditioned upon, among other things,
the simultaneous merger of HPGP MergerCo, LLC, a subsidiary of
Parent, with and into Hiland Holdings GP, LP (Hiland
Holdings), as contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated June 1, 2009 (the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement) among Hiland Holdings, Hiland Partners GP
Holdings, LLC (the general partner of Hiland Holdings), Parent
and HPGP MergerCo, LLC. We have described both merger agreements
and the associated mergers in the attached joint proxy
statement, which you should read in its entirety before voting.
A copy of the Hiland Partners merger agreement is included as
Annex A and a copy of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
is included as Annex D to the attached joint proxy
statement.
YOUR VOTE
IS VERY IMPORTANT
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding common units of Hiland Partners, other than common
units held by Hiland Partners GP, LLC, its affiliates (including
Hiland Holdings) and the directors and officers of Hiland
Partners GP, LLC, entitled to vote thereon voting as a class and
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding subordinated units of Hiland Partners entitled to
vote thereon voting as a class are required to approve the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger.
Accordingly, a failure to vote, or an abstention from voting,
will have the same effect as a vote against the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger.
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, please
complete, sign, date and promptly mail the enclosed proxy card
as soon as possible or vote via telephone or the Internet using
the procedures described on the enclosed proxy card to make sure
your common units are represented at the special meeting. If you
attend the special meeting and wish to vote in person, then you
may revoke your proxy and vote in person. If you have instructed
a broker to vote your common units, then you must follow
directions received from the broker to change or revoke your
proxy.
By Order of the Board of Directors of Hiland Partners GP, LLC,
the general partner of Hiland Partners, LP,
Matthew S. Harrison
Secretary
Enid, Oklahoma
,
2009
Hiland
Holdings GP, LP
205 West Maple,
Suite 1100
Enid, Oklahoma 73701
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
UNITHOLDERS
To Be Held On
To the Holders of Common Units of Hiland Holdings GP, LP:
We will hold a special meeting of the holders of common units
representing limited partner interests (common
units) in Hiland Holdings GP, LP (Hiland
Holdings) on , 2009
at , local time,
at . The purpose of the special
meeting is:
1. To consider and vote on a proposal to approve
(a) the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 1,
2009 (the Hiland Holdings merger agreement) among
Hiland Holdings, Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC (the general
partner of Hiland Holdings), HH GP Holding, LLC (an affiliate of
Harold Hamm and the sole member of the general partner of Hiland
Holdings (Parent)), and HPGP MergerCo, LLC (a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent formed to effect the merger
(HPGP Merger Sub)), which agreement provides, among
other things, that HPGP Merger Sub will merge with and into
Hiland Holdings, with Hiland Holdings continuing as the
surviving entity (the Hiland Holdings merger) and
(b) the Hiland Holdings merger.
2. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting.
Only holders of Hiland Holdings common units at the close of
business on , 2009, the record date
established for the special meeting, are entitled to notice of,
and to vote at, the special meeting. A complete list of
unitholders entitled to vote at the special meeting will be
available for examination at Hiland Holdings headquarters,
205 West Maple, Suite 1100, Enid, Oklahoma 73701,
after , 2009 and at the special
meeting.
The obligations of Parent and HPGP Merger Sub to complete the
Hiland Holdings merger are conditioned upon, among other things,
the simultaneous merger of HLND MergerCo, LLC, a subsidiary of
Parent, with and into Hiland Partners, LP (Hiland
Partners), as contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated June 1, 2009 (the Hiland Partners merger
agreement) among Hiland Partners, Hiland Partners GP, LLC
(the general partner of Hiland Partners), Parent, and HLND
MergerCo, LLC. We have described both merger agreements and the
associated mergers in the attached joint proxy statement, which
you should read in its entirety before voting. A copy of the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement is included as Annex D and
a copy of the Hiland Partners merger agreement is included as
Annex A to the attached joint proxy statement.
YOUR VOTE
IS VERY IMPORTANT
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding common units of Hiland Holdings entitled to vote
thereon voting as a class and the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding common units of Hiland
Holdings, other than common units held by Harold Hamm, his
affiliates (including Continental Gas Holdings, Inc.
(Continental Gas)), the Harold Hamm DST Trust, the
Harold Hamm HJ Trust (together with the Harold Hamm DST Trust,
the Hamm family trusts) and the directors and
officers of the general partner of Hiland Holdings entitled to
vote thereon voting as a class are required to approve the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger.
Accordingly, a failure to vote, or an abstention from voting,
will have the same effect as a vote against the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger.
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, please
complete, sign, date and promptly mail the enclosed proxy card
as soon as possible or vote via telephone or the Internet using
the procedures described on the enclosed proxy card to make sure
your common units are represented at the special meeting. If you
attend the special meeting and wish to vote in person, then you
may revoke your proxy and vote in person. If you have instructed
a broker to vote your common units, then you must follow
directions received from the broker to change or revoke your
proxy.
By Order of the Board of Directors of Hiland Partners GP
Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Holdings GP, LP,
Matthew S. Harrison
Secretary
Enid, Oklahoma
,
2009
Table
of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
|
|
|
D-1
|
|
|
|
|
E-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
iii
SUMMARY
TERM SHEET
The following summary, together with Questions and
Answers About the Mergers and the Special Meetings,
highlight selected information contained in this joint proxy
statement and may not contain all of the information that may be
important in your consideration of the proposed mergers. We
encourage you to read carefully this joint proxy statement and
the documents we refer to and have incorporated by reference
herein before voting. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 191. We also encourage
you to read the merger agreements in their entirety as they are
the legal documents that govern the respective mergers. We have
included section references to direct you to a more complete
description of the topics described in this summary.
The
Parties
The
Hiland Companies
Hiland Partners, LP (which we sometimes refer to as Hiland
Partners) is a midstream energy limited partnership
engaged in purchasing, gathering, compressing, dehydrating,
treating, processing and marketing natural gas and
fractionating, or separating, and marketing natural gas liquids,
or NGLs.
Hiland Holdings GP, LP (which we sometimes refer to as
Hiland Holdings) was formed in May 2006 to own the
general partner of Hiland Partners and common units and
subordinated units in Hiland Partners. Currently, Hiland
Holdings owns:
|
|
|
|
|
2,321,471 Hiland Partners common units, representing
approximately 37% of the outstanding common units of Hiland
Partners;
|
|
|
|
all 3,060,000 of the subordinated units of Hiland
Partners; and
|
|
|
|
through its ownership of the general partner of Hiland Partners,
the 2% general partner interest and all of the incentive
distribution rights in Hiland Partners.
|
During the subordination period, the subordinated units are not
entitled to receive any distributions in a quarter until Hiland
Partners has paid the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.45
per unit (MQD), plus any arrearages in the payment
of the MQD from prior quarters, on all of the outstanding Hiland
Partners common units. The incentive distribution rights entitle
Hiland Holdings to receive increasing percentages (up to 48%) of
the cash distributed by Hiland Partners to its unitholders above
the MQD. No distributions may be made in any particular quarter
on the incentive distribution rights until the MQD has been paid
on all outstanding Hiland Partners common units and subordinated
units in respect of such quarter and any arrearages have been
paid in respect of the common units.
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings (which we collectively refer
to as the Hiland Companies) share a majority of
their directors as well as all of their officers, including the
chief executive officer and chief financial officer, and other
key management team members. See Information Concerning
the Hiland Companies beginning on page 170.
Harold
Hamm, Parent and Merger Subs
Harold Hamm, the chairman of the board of directors of the
general partner of each of the Hiland Companies, Continental Gas
Holdings, Inc., an affiliate of Mr. Hamm (Continental
Gas), and the Harold Hamm DST Trust and the Harold Hamm HJ
Trust (the Hamm family trusts), beneficially own
common units representing a 60.8% limited partner interest in
Hiland Holdings. Mr. Hamm, the Harold Hamm DST Trust and
the Harold Hamm HJ Trust own 90.7%, 5.6% and 3.7%, respectively,
of Continental Gas.
HH GP Holding, LLC (which we sometimes refer to as
Parent) owns 100% of the membership interests in the
general partner of Hiland Holdings. Mr. Hamm owns 100% of
the membership interests in Parent. HLND MergerCo, LLC (which we
sometimes refer to as HLND Merger Sub) and HPGP
MergerCo, LLC (which we sometimes refer to as HPGP Merger
Sub and together with HLND Merger Sub, the Merger
1
Subs), each currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent,
have been organized by Mr. Hamm and certain of his
affiliates to effect the mergers.
As used in this joint proxy statement, Hamm Continuing
Investors refers (i) with respect to the Hiland
Partners merger, to Harold Hamm, Parent, the general partner of
Hiland Holdings, Hiland Holdings and the Hamm family trusts, who
will collectively own all of the outstanding equity interests in
Hiland Partners (other than restricted common units, phantom
units and unit options issued and outstanding under the Hiland
Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan at the effective time of
the Hiland Partners merger) immediately following the Hiland
Partners merger, and (ii) with respect to the Hiland
Holdings merger, to Harold Hamm, Parent, Continental Gas and the
Hamm family trusts, who will collectively own all of the
outstanding equity interests in Hiland Holdings (other than
restricted common units, phantom units and unit options issued
and outstanding under the Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan at the effective time of the Hiland Holdings
merger) immediately following the Hiland Holdings merger.
See Information Concerning Harold Hamm, Parent and Merger
Subs beginning on page 185.
The
Mergers
The Hiland Companies have each separately agreed with Parent to
be acquired by Parent pursuant to the merger agreements
described in this joint proxy statement.
The
Hiland Partners Merger
Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
June 1, 2009 among Parent, HLND Merger Sub, Hiland Partners
GP, LLC (the general partner of Hiland Partners) and Hiland
Partners (which we sometimes refer to as the Hiland
Partners merger agreement), HLND Merger Sub will be merged
with and into Hiland Partners, with Hiland Partners continuing
its existence as the surviving entity (which we sometimes refer
to as the Hiland Partners merger). The Hiland
Partners merger agreement is attached to this joint proxy
statement as Annex A and is incorporated herein by
reference. We encourage you to read the Hiland Partners merger
agreement in its entirety because it is the legal document that
governs the Hiland Partners merger. See The Hiland
Partners Merger Agreement beginning on page 133.
The
Hiland Holdings Merger
Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
June 1, 2009 among Parent, HPGP Merger Sub, Hiland Partners
GP Holdings, LLC (the general partner of Hiland Holdings) and
Hiland Holdings (which we sometimes refer to as the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement), HPGP Merger Sub will be merged
with and into Hiland Holdings, with Hiland Holdings continuing
its existence as the surviving entity (which we sometimes refer
to as the Hiland Holdings merger). The Hiland
Holdings merger agreement is attached to this joint proxy
statement as Annex D and is incorporated herein by
reference. We encourage you to read the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement in its entirety because it is the legal document that
governs the Hiland Holdings merger. See The Hiland
Holdings Merger Agreement beginning on page 152.
The
Merger Consideration
The
Hiland Partners Merger Consideration
If the Hiland Partners merger is completed, holders of common
units of Hiland Partners (other than Hiland Holdings and, only
to the extent that they hold restricted common units, officers
and employees of Hiland Partners (collectively, the Hiland
Partners rollover common unitholders)) will receive the
merger consideration of $7.75 in cash for each common unit of
Hiland Partners that they own. We refer to such amount in this
joint proxy statement as the Hiland Partners merger
consideration. See The Hiland Partners Merger
Agreement beginning on page 133.
2
The
Hiland Holdings Merger Consideration
If the Hiland Holdings merger is completed, holders of common
units of Hiland Holdings (other than Harold Hamm, Continental
Gas, the Hamm family trusts and, only to the extent that they
hold restricted common units, officers and employees of Hiland
Holdings (collectively, the Hiland Holdings rollover
common unitholders)) will receive the merger consideration
of $2.40 in cash for each common unit of Hiland Holdings that
they own. We refer to such amount in this joint proxy statement
as the Hiland Holdings merger consideration. See
The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement beginning on
page 133.
Effects
of the Mergers
Effects
of the Hiland Partners Merger on Outstanding Partnership
Interests in Hiland Partners
If the Hiland Partners merger is completed, holders of Hiland
Partners common units (other than the Hiland Partners rollover
common unitholders) will receive $7.75 per unit in cash for each
Hiland Partners common unit that they own. Restricted common
units issued pursuant to the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan that are held by non-employee members of the
Board of Directors of the general partner of Hiland Partners
(which we sometimes refer to as the Hiland Partners Board
of Directors) will vest immediately prior to the closing
and automatically convert into the right to receive the Hiland
Partners merger consideration. Other restricted common units,
phantom units and unit option awards issued pursuant to the
Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan that are
outstanding as of the effective time of the Hiland Partners
merger will remain outstanding in accordance with their
respective terms as equity awards in the surviving entity in the
Hiland Partners merger. Additionally, the following partnership
interests will be unaffected and remain outstanding as
partnership interests in the surviving entity of the Hiland
Partners merger, and their holders will not receive any
consideration therefor as part of the Hiland Partners merger:
|
|
|
|
|
2,321,471 Hiland Partners common units owned by Hiland Holdings;
|
|
|
|
3,060,000 Hiland Partners subordinated units representing
limited partners interests in Hiland Partners (the
subordinated units) owned by Hiland Holdings;
|
|
|
|
the 2% general partner interest in Hiland Partners, represented
by 191,186 general partner units owned by the general
partner of Hiland Partners; and
|
|
|
|
the incentive distribution rights in Hiland Partners owned by
the general partner of Hiland Partners.
|
See The Hiland Partners Merger Agreement
Effect of the Merger on the Common Units and Certain Other
Securities of Hiland Partners and HLND Merger Sub
beginning on page 134.
Effects
of the Hiland Holdings Merger on Outstanding Partnership
Interests in Hiland Holdings
If the Hiland Holdings merger is completed, holders of Hiland
Holdings common units (other than the Hiland Holdings rollover
common unitholders) will receive $2.40 per unit in cash for each
Hiland Holdings common unit that they own. Restricted common
units issued pursuant to the Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan that are held by non-employee members of the
Board of Directors of the general partner of Hiland Holdings
(which we sometimes refer to as the Hiland Holdings Board
of Directors) will vest immediately prior to the closing
and automatically convert into the right to receive the Hiland
Holdings merger consideration. Other restricted common units,
phantom units and unit option awards issued pursuant to the
Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan that are
outstanding as of the effective time of the Hiland Holdings
merger will remain outstanding in accordance with their
respective terms as equity awards of the surviving entity in the
Hiland Holdings merger. Additionally, the following partnership
interests will be unaffected and remain outstanding as
partnership interests in the surviving entity in the Hiland
Holdings merger, and their holders will not receive any
consideration therefor as part of the Hiland Holdings merger:
|
|
|
|
|
8,481,350 Hiland Holdings common units owned by Continental Gas;
|
|
|
|
2,757,390 Hiland Holdings common units owned by the Harold Hamm
DST Trust;
|
|
|
|
1,839,712 Hiland Holdings common units owned by the Harold Hamm
HJ Trust;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
59,600 Hiland Holdings common units owned directly by Harold
Hamm; and
|
|
|
|
the non-economic general partner interest in Hiland Holdings
owned by the general partner of Hiland Holdings.
|
See The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement
Effect of the Merger on the Common Units and Certain Other
Securities of Hiland Holdings and HPGP Merger Sub
beginning on page 153.
Continued
Investment by Harold Hamm, certain of his Affiliates and the
Hamm family trusts
Upon consummation of the mergers, the Hamm Continuing Investors
will (i) retain their equity interests in the Hiland
Companies, if any; and (ii) directly and indirectly acquire
all other outstanding equity interests in each of the Hiland
Companies (other than restricted common units, phantom units and
unit options of Hiland Partners issued to officers and employees
pursuant to the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan and
restricted common units, phantom units and unit options of
Hiland Holdings issued to officers and employees pursuant to the
Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan, in each case
that remain outstanding as of the effective time of the mergers).
As a result of the mergers, the Hamm Continuing Investors will
own 100% of the outstanding equity interests in each of Hiland
Partners and Hiland Holdings (other than the equity interests of
officers and employees issued and outstanding at the effective
time of the mergers under the equity plans described above). See
Special Factors Structure and Steps of the
Mergers and Special Factors Interests of
Certain Persons in the Mergers beginning on pages 122
and 108, respectively.
Going
Private Transaction
If the mergers are completed, (i) the Hiland Partners
public unitholders will no longer have an equity interest in
Hiland Partners and the Hiland Holdings public unitholders will
no longer have an equity interest in Hiland Holdings,
(ii) the common units of the Hiland Companies will no
longer be listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, and
(iii) the registration of the common units of the Hiland
Companies under Section 12 of the Exchange Act will be
terminated. Each of the Hiland Companies will continue to file
periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) to the extent required by the agreements
governing such Hiland Companys indebtedness or applicable
law.
It is expected that the Hamm family trusts will subscribe for
limited liability company units in each Merger Sub immediately
prior to the effective time of the applicable merger, thereby
reducing Mr. Hamms capital commitment and ultimate
ownership of the Merger Subs. The following charts depict the
organization and ownership of Hiland Holdings and Hiland
Partners and its subsidiaries (i) immediately prior to any
subscription by the Hamm family trusts for limited liability
company units in the Merger Subs and (ii) after giving
effect to the mergers.
4
Pre-Mergers
Organizational Chart
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes common and subordinated units |
5
Post-Mergers
Organizational Chart
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes common and subordinated units |
|
|
|
Assumes consummation of both mergers. |
6
The
Special Meetings
Time,
Date and Place
The Hiland Partners special meeting will be held
on , 2009
at , local time,
at . The Hiland Holdings special
meeting will be held on , 2009
at , local time,
at .
Purpose
Purpose
of the Hiland Partners Unitholder Vote
The unitholders of Hiland Partners are being asked to consider
and vote on a proposal to approve the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the Hiland Partners merger. The persons named in
the accompanying proxy card will have discretionary authority to
vote on other business, if any, that properly comes before the
Hiland Partners special meeting and any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
Purpose
of the Hiland Holdings Unitholder Vote
The unitholders of Hiland Holdings are being asked to consider
and vote on a proposal to approve the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger. The persons named in
the accompanying proxy card will have discretionary authority to
vote on other business, if any, that properly comes before the
Hiland Holdings special meeting and any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
Unitholders
Entitled to Vote
Holders of Hiland Partners common units as
of , 2009, the record date for the
Hiland Partners special meeting, will be entitled to vote at the
Hiland Partners special meeting. Holders of Hiland Holdings
common units as of , 2009, the
record date for the Hiland Holdings special meeting, will be
entitled to vote at the Hiland Holdings special meeting. Each
unitholder may cast one vote at the applicable special meeting
for each common unit of the applicable Hiland Company that such
unitholder owned at the close of business on the record date. On
the record date, there were Hiland
Partners common units and Hiland
Holdings common units outstanding and entitled to be voted at
their respective special meetings.
Required
Unitholder Votes; Support Agreements
Required
Hiland Partners Vote
Under the terms of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Hiland Partners, which we refer to in this joint proxy statement
as the Hiland Partners partnership agreement, the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger
must be approved by the holders of:
|
|
|
|
|
a majority of the outstanding common units of Hiland Partners
owned by Hiland Partners public unitholders (as further
described below) entitled to vote thereon voting as a
class; and
|
|
|
|
a majority of the outstanding subordinated units of Hiland
Partners entitled to vote thereon voting as a class.
|
Holders of common units of Hiland Partners, other than the
general partner of Hiland Partners, its affiliates (including
Hiland Holdings) and the directors and officers of the general
partner of Hiland Partners, are referred to in this joint proxy
statement as the Hiland Partners public unitholders.
Based on the number of common units of Hiland Partners expected
to be outstanding on the record date,
approximately Hiland Partners
common units owned by Hiland Partners public unitholders must be
voted in favor of the proposal to approve the Hiland Partners
merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger in order for the
proposal to be approved.
Hiland Holdings, which owns 2,321,471 common units and all of
the outstanding subordinated units of Hiland Partners, has
entered into a support agreement with its general partner,
Hiland Partners, the general
7
partner of Hiland Partners, Parent and HLND Merger Sub (which we
refer to as the Hiland Partners support agreement)
in which it has agreed to (i) maintain the ownership of
Hiland Partners common units and subordinated units held by it,
except in certain circumstances, and (ii) vote its common
units and subordinated units in favor of the approval of the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger.
The Hiland Partners support agreement assures that the approval
of holders of a majority of the subordinated units will be
obtained, except in certain limited circumstances. See
Information about the Special Meetings and
Voting Vote Required at Hiland Partners Special
Meeting; How Units Are Voted beginning on page 130.
Required
Hiland Holdings Vote
Under the terms of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hiland
Holdings, which we refer to in this joint proxy statement as the
Hiland Holdings partnership agreement, the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger must be
approved by the holders of:
|
|
|
|
|
a majority of the outstanding common units of Hiland Holdings
entitled to vote thereon voting as a class; and
|
|
|
|
a majority of the outstanding common units of Hiland Holdings
owned by Hiland Holdings public unitholders (as further
described below) entitled to vote thereon voting as a class.
|
Holders of common units of Hiland Holdings, other than Harold
Hamm, his affiliates (including Continental Gas), the Hamm
family trusts and the directors and officers of the general
partner of Hiland Holdings, are referred to in this joint proxy
statement as the Hiland Holdings public unitholders.
Based on the number of common units of Hiland Holdings expected
to be outstanding on the record date,
approximately
Hiland Holdings common units owned by Hiland Holdings public
unitholders must be voted in favor of the proposal to approve
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
merger in order for the proposal to be approved.
Harold Hamm, Continental Gas, and Bert Mackie, as trustee of the
Hamm family trusts which, as of ,
2009, collectively held an aggregate of 13,138,052 Hiland
Holdings common units representing approximately 60.8% of the
total voting power of the Hiland Holdings common units, have
entered into a support agreement with Hiland Holdings and the
general partner of Hiland Holdings (which we refer to as the
Hiland Holdings support agreement) in which they
have agreed to (i) maintain the ownership of their common
units, except in certain circumstances, and (ii) vote their
common units in favor of the approval of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger. The Hiland
Holdings support agreement assures that the approval of holders
of a majority of the outstanding Hiland Holdings common units
will be obtained, except in certain limited circumstances. See
Information about the Special Meetings and
Voting Vote Required at Hiland Holdings Special
Meeting; How Units are Voted beginning on page 131.
The
Relationship between the Hiland Holdings Merger and the Hiland
Partners Merger
The obligations of Parent and HLND Merger Sub to complete the
Hiland Partners merger are conditioned upon, among other things,
the concurrent completion of the Hiland Holdings merger. In
addition, the obligations of Parent and HPGP Merger Sub to
complete the Hiland Holdings merger are conditioned upon, among
other things, the concurrent completion of the Hiland Partners
merger. Accordingly, the Hiland Partners merger may not be
completed, even if it is approved by the unitholders of Hiland
Partners, if the Hiland Holdings merger is not completed
concurrently. Likewise, the Hiland Holdings merger may not be
completed, even if it is approved by the unitholders of Hiland
Holdings, if the Hiland Partners merger is not completed
concurrently.
In certain circumstances, however, Parent and its applicable
Merger Sub will have the option to complete one of the mergers
without completing the other merger. In particular:
|
|
|
|
|
Parent and HLND Merger Sub may waive the condition contained in
the Hiland Partners merger agreement that the two mergers close
concurrently if the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
Hiland Holdings merger are submitted to a vote of the
unitholders of Hiland Holdings and are not approved by
(i) holders of a majority of the outstanding common units
of Hiland Holdings entitled to vote thereon voting as a class
(which approval is assured except in certain circumstances
pursuant to the terms of the Hiland Holdings support agreement)
and (ii) holders of a majority of the outstanding common
units of Hiland Holdings held by Hiland Partners public
unitholders entitled to vote thereon voting as a class; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent and HPGP Merger Sub may waive the condition contained in
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement that the two mergers close
concurrently if the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the
Hiland Partners merger are submitted to a vote of the
unitholders of Hiland Partners and are not approved by
(i) holders of a majority of the outstanding common units
of Hiland Partners held by Hiland Partners public unitholders
entitled to vote thereon voting as a class and (ii) holders
of a majority of the outstanding subordinated units of Hiland
Partners entitled to vote thereon voting as a class (which
approval is assured except in certain circumstances pursuant to
the terms of the Hiland Partners support agreement).
|
See The Hiland Partners Merger Agreement
Conditions to Completion of the Hiland Partners Merger
beginning on page 147 and The Hiland Holdings Merger
Agreement Conditions to Completion of the Hiland
Holdings Merger beginning on page 165.
Recommendations
of the Hiland Companies Boards of Directors and Conflicts
Committees
Recommendations
of Hiland Partners Board of Directors and Conflicts
Committee
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, which was delegated the
authority to review and evaluate the acquisition proposal made
by Harold Hamm, and any potential alternatives thereto, has
unanimously approved the Hiland Partners merger agreement and
the Hiland Partners merger and determined that the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger are
advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland
Partners and the Hiland Partners public unitholders and has
recommended to the Hiland Partners Board of Directors that the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors approve the Hiland Partners
merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger. Accordingly,
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee recommends that the
Hiland Partners public unitholders vote in favor of the approval
of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger.
The material factors that led the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee to draw such conclusions included:
|
|
|
|
|
The cash consideration of $7.75 per common unit, a price the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee viewed as fair in light of
Hiland Partners recent and projected financial performance
and recent trading prices of Hiland Partners common units.
In this regard, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
concluded that the best alternative was the proposed Hiland
Partners merger.
|
|
|
|
The opinion received by the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
from its financial advisor, Jefferies & Company, Inc.
(which we sometimes refer to as Jefferies &
Company), to the effect that, as of the date of the
opinion, the $7.75 per common unit merger consideration to be
received by the Hiland Partners public unitholders pursuant to
the Hiland Partners merger agreement was fair, from a financial
point of view, to those holders, as well as the presentation of
Jefferies & Company on June 1, 2009, in
connection with the foregoing opinion.
|
|
|
|
The difficult business environment currently facing Hiland
Partners, including the level of commodity prices and the
significant reduction in drilling activity and the resulting
negative effect on the financial condition and results of
operations of Hiland Partners.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees belief that it
was unlikely that any other transaction with a third party could
be consummated at this time in light of the position of
Mr. Hamm outlined in his offer letters that the Hamm
Continuing Investors were interested only in acquiring common
units of the Hiland Companies and not in selling interests in
the Hiland Companies.
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees belief that the
$7.75 per common unit merger consideration represented the
highest per-common unit consideration that could be negotiated.
|
|
|
|
The likelihood that Hiland Partners would be in violation of the
leverage ratio covenant under the Credit Agreement dated as of
February 15, 2005 (the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement) among Hiland Operating, LLC (a subsidiary of
Hiland Partners, which we refer to as Hiland
Operating), the lenders party thereto and MidFirst Bank
(MidFirst Bank), as administrative agent, as soon as
June 30, 2009.
|
After considering various factors, including the unanimous
recommendation of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and
the delivery of the opinion of Jefferies & Company to
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
has determined that the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the
Hiland Partners merger are advisable, fair to, and in the best
interests of, Hiland Partners and the Hiland Partners public
unitholders; and
|
|
|
|
has approved the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland
Partners merger.
|
Accordingly, the Hiland Partners Board of Directors
recommends that the Hiland Partners public unitholders approve
the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger.
See Special Factors Recommendations of the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and Hiland Partners Board of
Directors; Reasons for Recommending Approval of the Merger
beginning on page 53.
Recommendations
of Hiland Holdings Board of Directors and Conflicts
Committee
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, which was delegated the
authority to review and evaluate the acquisition proposal made
by Harold Hamm, and any potential alternatives thereto, has
unanimously approved the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and
the Hiland Holdings merger and determined that the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger are
advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland
Holdings and the Hiland Holdings public unitholders and
recommended to the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors that the
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors approve the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger. Accordingly,
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee recommends that the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders vote in favor of the approval
of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
merger.
The material factors that led the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee to draw such conclusions included:
|
|
|
|
|
The cash consideration of $2.40 per common unit, a price the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee viewed as fair in light of
Hiland Holdings recent and projected financial performance
and recent trading prices of Hiland Holdings common units.
In this regard, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
considered the effect of the suspension of distributions by
Hiland Partners on April 27, 2009, given that Hiland
Holdings only cash flowing assets consist of partnership
interests in Hiland Partners.
|
|
|
|
The opinion received by the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
from its financial advisor, Barclays Capital Inc. (which we
sometimes refer to as Barclays Capital), to the
effect that, as of the date of the opinion, the $2.40 per common
unit merger consideration to be offered to the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders pursuant to the Hiland Holdings merger was
fair, from a financial point of view, to those holders as well
as the presentation of Barclays Capital on June 1, 2009, in
connection with the foregoing opinion.
|
|
|
|
The difficult business environment currently facing the Hiland
Companies, including the level of commodity prices and the
significant reduction in drilling activity and the resulting
negative effect on the financial condition and results of
operations of the Hiland Companies.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees belief that there
were no alternatives to Mr. Hamms proposal that would
likely be viable or financially superior to the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders.
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees belief that the
$2.40 per common unit merger consideration represented the
highest per-common unit consideration that could be negotiated.
|
|
|
|
The likelihood that Hiland Partners would be in violation of the
leverage ratio covenant under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement as soon as June 30, 2009.
|
After considering various factors, including the unanimous
recommendation of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and
the delivery of the opinion of Barclays Capital to the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee, the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
has determined that the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
Hiland Holdings merger are advisable, fair to, and in the best
interests of, Hiland Holdings and the Hiland Holdings public
unitholders; and
|
|
|
|
has approved the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland
Holdings merger.
|
Accordingly, the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
recommends that the Hiland Holdings public unitholders approve
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
merger.
See Special Factors Recommendations of the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors; Reasons for Recommending Approval of the Merger
beginning on page 67.
Opinion
of Financial Advisors
Opinion
of Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee Financial
Advisors
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee received an opinion from
Jefferies & Company to the effect that, as of the date
of its opinion, the cash merger consideration of $7.75 per
common unit to be received by the Hiland Partners public
unitholders pursuant to the Hiland Partners merger agreement was
fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. The
opinion is subject to the assumptions, limitations and
qualifications set forth in the opinion, which is attached as
Annex C to this joint proxy statement. See Special
Factors Opinion of Financial Advisor of Hiland
Partners beginning on page 59.
Opinion
of Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee Financial
Advisors
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee received an opinion from
Barclays Capital to the effect that, as of the date of its
opinion, the cash merger consideration of $2.40 per common unit
to be offered to the Hiland Holdings public unitholders pursuant
to the Hiland Holdings merger was fair, from a financial point
of view, to such holders. The opinion is subject to the
assumptions, limitations and qualifications set forth in the
opinion, which is attached as Annex F to this joint proxy
statement. See Special Factors Opinion of
Financial Advisor of Hiland Holdings beginning on
page 74.
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Mergers
When considering the mergers, you should be aware that some
unitholders, directors and officers of the Hiland Companies have
interests in the mergers that may be different from, or in
addition to, your interests as a unitholder generally, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the non-employee directors of the general partner of each of the
Hiland Companies hold restricted common units, which will vest
immediately prior to the effective time of the applicable merger
and automatically convert into the right to receive the merger
consideration in the applicable merger;
|
|
|
|
certain officers of the Hiland Companies own phantom units in
Hiland Partners that will remain outstanding as equity interests
in the surviving entity following the Hiland Partners merger;
additionally, if any officers or employees of the Hiland
Companies are granted restricted common units, phantom units or
unit options issued under the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan or the Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term Incentive
Plan in the ordinary course of business prior to the effective
time of the mergers, such equity interests will remain
outstanding following the effective time of the mergers;
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph L. Griffin and Matthew S. Harrison, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
each of the Hiland Companies, have agreed to vote their 4,307
and 2,500 respective common units of Hiland Partners in favor of
the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger, have been offered continued employment with the
surviving entities after the effective times of the mergers and
may enter into or be provided new employment, retention and
compensation arrangements (although no such new arrangements
have been proposed or agreed to);
|
|
|
|
the members of the respective Conflicts Committees have received
payments in the amount of $30,000 each for their consideration
and negotiation of the mergers, which payments were not
contingent on any outcome of the consideration or
negotiations; and
|
|
|
|
certain indemnification arrangements and insurance policies for
directors and officers of the general partner of each of the
Hiland Companies will be continued for six years by the
surviving entities in the mergers if the mergers are completed.
|
These arrangements are more fully described under Special
Factors Interests of Certain Persons in the
Mergers beginning on page 108.
Unit
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
As of , 2009, the record date for
the Hiland Partners special meeting, the directors and executive
officers of the general partner of Hiland Partners held and were
entitled to vote, in the aggregate, Hiland Partners common units
representing approximately % of the
outstanding Hiland Partners common units. Hiland Partners
believes that the directors and executive officers of the
general partner of Hiland Partners intend to vote all of their
Hiland Partners common units FOR the approval of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger.
However, because the directors and executive officers of the
general partner of Hiland Partners are affiliates of the general
partner of Hiland Partners, their votes will not be counted
towards determining if a majority of the Hiland Partners public
unitholders have approved the Hiland Partners merger agreement
and the Hiland Partners merger.
As of , 2009, the record date for
the Hiland Holdings special meeting, the directors of the
general partner of Hiland Holdings (other than Mr. Hamm)
held and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, Hiland
Holdings common units representing approximately % of
the outstanding Hiland Holdings common units. Hiland Holdings
believes that the directors of the general partner of Hiland
Holdings intend to vote all of their Hiland Holdings common
units FOR the approval of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings merger. However, pursuant to the
provisions of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, the votes of
directors and executive officers of the general partner of
Hiland Holdings will not be counted toward determining if a
majority of the public unitholders of Hiland Holdings have
approved the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland
Holdings merger.
See Information About the Special Meetings and
Voting Vote Required at Hiland Partners Special
Meeting; How Units are Voted, beginning on page 130
and Information About the Special Meetings and
Voting Vote Required at the Hiland Holdings Special
Meeting; How Units are Voted, beginning on page 131.
Conditions
to Completion of the Mergers
Conditions
to the Completion of the Hiland Partners Merger
Before the Hiland Partners merger can be completed, a number of
conditions must be satisfied or waived. These include:
|
|
|
|
|
approval of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland
Partners merger by (a) holders of a majority of the
outstanding Hiland Partners common units held by Hiland Partners
public unitholders entitled to vote thereon voting as a class
and (b) holders of a majority of the outstanding
subordinated units of Hiland Partners entitled to vote thereon
voting as a class;
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of any restraining order, preliminary or permanent
injunction or other order by any court of competent jurisdiction
or other legal restraint or prohibition enacted or promulgated
by any governmental entity restraining, enjoining or otherwise
prohibiting the consummation of the Hiland Partners merger;
|
|
|
|
the waiting period applicable to the consummation of the Hiland
Partners merger under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Act, which we refer to in this joint proxy statement as the
HSR Act, having expired or been terminated;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of Parents and HLND Merger Subs
representations and warranties in the Hiland Partners merger
agreement, except (subject to certain specified exceptions) to
the extent that the failure of such representations and
warranties to be accurate (without regard to qualifications or
exceptions as to materiality or material adverse effect) would
not, individually or in the aggregate, prevent or materially
delay or materially impair the ability of Parent or HLND Merger
Sub to consummate the Hiland Partners merger and any other
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of Hiland Partners and its general
partners representations and warranties in the Hiland
Partners merger agreement, except (subject to certain specified
exceptions) to the extent that the failure of such
representations and warranties to be accurate (without regard to
qualifications or exceptions as to materiality or material
adverse effect) would not have, individually or in the
aggregate, a material adverse effect (as defined in the Hiland
Partners merger agreement) with respect to Hiland Partners;
|
|
|
|
performance by each of the parties of its obligations and
compliance by each of the parties with its covenants that are
qualified by materiality or material adverse effect and
performance in all material respects by each of the parties of
its other obligations and compliance in all material respects by
each of the parties with its other covenants;
|
|
|
|
no material adverse effect (as defined in the Hiland Partners
merger agreement) with respect to Hiland Partners having
occurred after the date of the Hiland Partners merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings merger being effectuated concurrently with
the Hiland Partners merger (which condition can only be waived
by Parent and HLND Merger Sub if the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and Hiland Holdings merger have been submitted to a
vote of the common unitholders of Hiland Holdings and the
outcome of such vote fails to satisfy the requisite approval
under the Hiland Holdings merger agreement); and
|
|
|
|
delivery of certain certificates of officers of the parties
certifying satisfaction of certain of the above closing
conditions.
|
Hiland Partners can give no assurance when or if all of the
conditions to the Hiland Partners merger will be either
satisfied or, to the extent possible, waived, or that the Hiland
Partners merger will be consummated. See The Hiland
Partners Merger Agreement Conditions to Completion
of the Hiland Partners Merger beginning on page 147.
Conditions
to the Completion of the Hiland Holdings Merger
Before the Hiland Holdings merger can be completed, a number of
conditions must be satisfied or waived. These include:
|
|
|
|
|
approval of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland
Holdings merger by (a) holders of a majority of the
outstanding Hiland Holdings common units held by Hiland Holdings
public unitholders entitled to vote thereon voting as a class
and (b) the holders of a majority of the outstanding common
units of Hiland Holdings entitled to vote thereon voting as a
class;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any restraining order, preliminary or permanent
injunction or other order by any court of competent jurisdiction
or other legal restraint or prohibition enacted or promulgated
by any governmental entity restraining, enjoining or otherwise
prohibiting the consummation of the Hiland Holdings merger;
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
the waiting period applicable to the consummation of the Hiland
Holdings merger under the HSR Act having expired or been
terminated;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of Parents and HPGP Merger Subs
representations and warranties in the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, except (subject to certain specified exceptions) to
the extent that the failure of such representations and
warranties to be accurate (without regard to qualifications or
exceptions as to materiality or material adverse effect) would
not, individually or in the aggregate, prevent or materially
delay or materially impair the ability of Parent or HPGP Merger
Sub to consummate the Hiland Holdings merger and any other
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of Hiland Holdings and its general
partners representations and warranties in the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement, except (subject to certain specified
exceptions) to the extent that the failure of such
representations and warranties to be accurate (without regard to
qualifications or exceptions as to materiality or material
adverse effect) would not have, individually or in the
aggregate, a material adverse effect (as defined in the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement) with respect to Hiland Holdings;
|
|
|
|
performance by each of the parties of its obligations and
compliance by each of the parties with its covenants that are
qualified by materiality or material adverse effect and
performance in all material respects by each of the parties of
its other obligations and compliance in all material respects by
each of the parties with its other covenants;
|
|
|
|
no material adverse effect (as defined in the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement) with respect to Hiland Holdings having
occurred after the date of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Partners merger being effectuated concurrently with
the Hiland Holdings merger (which condition can only be waived
by Parent and HPGP Merger Sub if the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and Hiland Partners merger have been submitted to a
vote of the common unitholders and subordinated unitholders of
Hiland Partners and the outcome of such vote fails to satisfy
the requisite approval under the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the Hiland Partners partnership
agreement); and
|
|
|
|
delivery of certain certificates of officers of the parties
certifying satisfaction of certain of the above closing
conditions.
|
Hiland Holdings can give no assurance when or if all of the
conditions to the Hiland Holdings merger will be either
satisfied or, to the extent possible, waived, or that the Hiland
Holdings merger will be consummated. See The Hiland
Holdings Merger Agreement Conditions to Completion
of the Hiland Holdings Merger beginning on page 165.
Definition
of Material Adverse Effect Under the Merger Agreements
For purposes of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and subject
to specified exceptions, a material adverse effect
means, with respect to Hiland Partners, any fact, circumstance,
event, change, effect or occurrence that, individually or in the
aggregate with all other facts, circumstances, events, changes,
effects or occurrences, has had or would be reasonably likely to
have a material adverse effect on the assets, liabilities,
properties, business, results of operations or condition
(financial or otherwise) of Hiland Partners and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or on the ability of Hiland
Partners and its general partner to perform their obligations
under the Hiland Partners merger agreement or to consummate the
Hiland Partners merger. See The Hiland Partners Merger
Agreement Representations and Warranties
beginning on page 135.
For purposes of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and subject
to specified exceptions, a material adverse effect
means, with respect to Hiland Holdings, any fact, circumstance,
event, change, effect or occurrence that, individually or in the
aggregate with all other facts, circumstances, events, changes,
effects or occurrences, has had or would be reasonably likely to
have a material adverse effect on the assets, liabilities,
properties, business, results of operations or condition
(financial or otherwise) of Hiland Holdings and its general
partner, taken as a whole, or on the ability of Hiland Holdings
and its general partner to perform their obligations under the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement or to consummate the Hiland
Holdings merger. See The Hiland Holdings Merger
Agreement Representations and Warranties
beginning on page 154.
14
Regulatory
Approvals
In order to consummate the Hiland Partners merger, Parent, HLND
Merger Sub and Hiland Partners must make the requisite filings
with the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission
under the HSR Act, and all applicable waiting periods thereunder
must expire or be terminated. See Special
Factors Certain Legal Matters HSR
Act, beginning on page 127.
Termination
of the Merger Agreements
Termination
of the Hiland Partners Merger Agreement
The Hiland Partners merger agreement may be terminated and the
Hiland Partners merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the
effective time of the Hiland Partners merger, whether before or
after Hiland Partners unitholders approve the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger:
|
|
|
|
|
by the mutual written consent of Hiland Partners and the general
partner of Hiland Partners (which we collectively refer to as
the Hiland Parties) and Parent and HLND Merger Sub
(which we collectively refer to as the HLND Parent
Parties);
|
|
|
|
by either the Hiland Parties or the HLND Parent Parties, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger does not occur
on or before November 1, 2009 and the party seeking to
terminate the Hiland Partners merger agreement has not breached
its obligations under the Hiland Partners merger agreement in
any manner that proximately caused the failure to consummate the
Hiland Partners merger on or before November 1, 2009;
|
|
|
|
an injunction, other legal restraint or order of any
governmental entity shall have been entered permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation
of the Hiland Partners merger and such injunction, other legal
restraint or order becomes final and nonappealable; provided
that the party seeking to terminate the Hiland Partners merger
agreement must have complied in all material respects with its
obligations summarized under The Hiland Partners Merger
Agreement Other Covenants and Agreements
Efforts to Complete the Hiland Partners Merger; or
|
|
|
|
upon a vote taken at a properly concluded special meeting of the
unitholders of Hiland Partners, the requisite unitholder
approval of the Hiland Partners merger is not obtained; provided
that the right to terminate the Hiland Partners merger agreement
will not be available to the Hiland Parties if any Hiland Party
materially breached any of its obligations summarized under
The Hiland Partners Merger Agreement Other
Covenants and Agreements No Solicitation and
The Hiland Partners Merger Agreement Other
Covenants and Agreements Filings; Other
Actions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the Hiland Parties, if any HLND Parent Party has breached or
failed to perform any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or other agreements contained in the Hiland Partners
merger agreement, if the breach or failure to perform:
|
|
|
|
|
|
would constitute the failure of a condition to the Hiland
Parties obligations to complete the Hiland Partners
merger; and
|
|
|
|
is not capable of being satisfied or cured by November 1,
2009 or, if capable of being satisfied or cured, is not
satisfied or cured by thirty days following receipt by Parent of
written notice stating the Hiland Parties intention to
terminate the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the basis for
such termination;
|
provided that the right to terminate the Hiland Partners merger
agreement pursuant to the provision summarized above will not be
available to the Hiland Parties if, at such time, a condition to
the HLND Parent Parties obligation to complete the Hiland
Partners merger is not capable of being satisfied; or
15
|
|
|
|
|
by the HLND Parent Parties, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
any Hiland Party has breached or failed to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements
contained in the Hiland Partners merger agreement, if the breach
or failure to perform: (A) would constitute the failure of
a condition to the HLND Parent Parties obligations to
complete the Hiland Partners merger and (B) is not capable
of being satisfied or cured by November 1, 2009 or, if
capable of being satisfied or cured, is not satisfied or cured
by thirty days following receipt by the Hiland Parties of
written notice stating the HLND Parent Parties intention
to terminate the Hiland Partners merger agreement; provided that
the right to terminate the Hiland Partners merger agreement
pursuant to the provision summarized in this bullet point will
not be available to the HLND Parent Parties if, at such time, a
condition to the Hiland Parties obligation to complete the
Hiland Partners merger is not capable of being satisfied;
|
|
|
|
a change in the recommendation of the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors or Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee or a failure of
the Hiland Partners Board of Directors or Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee to recommend the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and Hiland Partners merger to the Hiland Partners
public unitholders occurs or the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors or any committee thereof approves, endorses or
recommends, or resolves to or publicly proposes to approve,
endorse or recommend, any alternative proposal (collectively, a
Hiland Partners change of recommendation); or
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings merger and the Hiland Partners merger are
not capable of closing concurrently on or before
November 1, 2009.
|
See The Hiland Partners Merger Agreement
Termination beginning on page 148.
Termination
of the Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement
The Hiland Holdings merger agreement may be terminated and the
Hiland Holdings merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the
effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger, whether before or
after Hiland Holdings unitholders approve the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger:
|
|
|
|
|
by the mutual written consent of Hiland Holdings and the general
partner of Hiland Holdings (which we collectively refer to as
the Holdings Parties) and Parent and HPGP Merger Sub
(which we collectively refer to as the HPGP Parent
Parties);
|
|
|
|
by either the Holdings Parties or the HPGP Parent Parties, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger does not occur
on or before November 1, 2009 and the party seeking to
terminate the Hiland Holdings merger agreement has not breached
its obligations under the Hiland Holdings merger agreement in
any manner that proximately caused the failure to consummate the
Hiland Holdings merger on or before November 1, 2009;
|
|
|
|
an injunction, other legal restraint or order of any
governmental entity shall have been entered permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation
of the Hiland Holdings merger and such injunction, other legal
restraint or order becomes final and nonappealable; provided
that the party seeking to terminate the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement must have complied in all material respects with its
obligations summarized under The Hiland Holdings Merger
Agreement Other Covenants and Agreements
Efforts to Complete the Hiland Holdings Merger; or
|
|
|
|
upon a vote taken at a properly concluded special meeting of the
unitholders of Hiland Holdings, the requisite unitholder
approval of the Hiland Holdings merger is not obtained; provided
that the right to terminate the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
will not be available to the Holdings Parties if any Holdings
Party materially breached any of its obligations summarized
under The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement
Other Covenants and Agreements No Solicitation
and The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement Other
Covenants and Agreements Filings; Other
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
Actions or to the HPGP Parent Parties if any Hamm
Continuing Investor materially breached any of its obligations
under the Hiland Holdings support agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the Holdings Parties, if any HPGP Parent Party shall have
breached or failed to perform any of its representations,
warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement, if the breach or failure to
perform:
|
|
|
|
|
|
would constitute the failure of a condition to the Holdings
Parties obligations to complete the Hiland Holdings
merger; and
|
|
|
|
is not capable of being satisfied or cured by November 1,
2009 or, if capable of being satisfied or cured, is not
satisfied or cured by thirty days following receipt by Parent of
written notice stating the Holdings Parties intention to
terminate the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the basis for
such termination;
|
provided that the right to terminate the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement pursuant to the provision summarized above will not be
available to the Holdings Parties if, at such time, a condition
to the HPGP Parent Parties obligation to complete the
Hiland Holdings merger is not capable of being satisfied; or
|
|
|
|
|
by the HPGP Parent Parties, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
any Holdings Party has breached or failed to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements
contained in the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, if the breach
or failure to perform: (A) would constitute the failure of
a condition to the HPGP Parent Parties obligations to
complete the Hiland Holdings merger and (B) is not capable
of being satisfied or cured by November 1, 2009 or, if
capable of being satisfied or cured, is not satisfied or cured
by thirty days following receipt by the Holdings Parties of
written notice stating the HPGP Parent Parties intention
to terminate the Hiland Holdings merger agreement; provided that
the right to terminate the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
pursuant to the provision summarized in this bullet point will
not be available to the HPGP Parent Parties if, at such time, a
condition to the Holdings Parties obligation to complete
the Hiland Holdings merger is not capable of being satisfied;
|
|
|
|
a change in the recommendation of the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors or Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee or a failure of
the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors or Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee to recommend the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and Hiland Holdings merger to the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders occurs or the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors or any committee thereof approves, endorses or
recommends, or resolves to or publicly proposes to approve,
endorse or recommend, any alternative proposal (collectively, a
Hiland Holdings change of recommendation); or
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Partners merger and the Hiland Holding merger are not
capable of closing concurrently on or before November 1,
2009.
|
See The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement
Termination beginning on page 167.
Fees and
Expenses; Remedies
Hiland
Partners; Reimbursement of Certain Expenses
Generally, each party to the Hiland Partners merger agreement is
responsible for its own expenses, including the fees and
expenses of its advisors, except that in the event that:
|
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Partners merger agreement is terminated by the HLND
Parent Parties due to a Hiland Partners change of recommendation
or;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
the following has occurred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
an alternative proposal is made known to the Hiland Parties or
is made directly to the Hiland Partners unitholders generally or
any person publicly announces an intention (whether or not
conditional or withdrawn) to make an alternative proposal,
|
|
|
|
thereafter, the Hiland Partners merger agreement is terminated
by the Hiland Parties or the HLND Parent Parties (as applicable)
because November 1, 2009 has passed, the unitholders of
Hiland Partners failed to approve the Hiland Partners merger
agreement or the Hiland Partners merger or any Hiland Party
breached or failed to perform any of its representations,
warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the
Hiland Partners merger agreement, and the breach or failure to
perform: (A) would constitute the failure of a condition to
the HLND Parent Parties obligations to complete the merger
and (B) is not capable of being satisfied or cured by
November 1, 2009 or, if capable of being satisfied or
cured, is not satisfied or cured by thirty days following
receipt by the Hiland Parties of written notice stating the HLND
Parent Parties intention to terminate the Hiland Partners
merger agreement, and
|
|
|
|
a Hiland Party or its subsidiary enters into a definitive
agreement with respect to, or consummates, a transaction
contemplated by any alternative proposal within twelve months of
the date the Hiland Partners merger agreement is terminated,
|
then Hiland Partners must pay to Parent all of the expenses of
the HLND Parent Parties, up to $1,100,000; provided that no
expense for which a HLND Parent Party has received reimbursement
pursuant to the Hiland Holdings merger agreement shall be paid
pursuant to this reimbursement obligation. See The Hiland
Partners Merger Agreement Reimbursement of Certain
Expenses, beginning on page 150.
Hiland
Holdings; Reimbursement of Certain Expenses
Generally, each party to the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is
responsible for its own expenses, including the fees and
expenses of its advisors, except that in the event that:
|
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is terminated by the HPGP
Parent Parties due to a Hiland Holdings change of
recommendation; or
|
|
|
|
the following has occurred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
an alternative proposal is made known to the Holdings Parties or
is made directly to the Hiland Holdings unitholders generally or
any person publicly announces an intention (whether or not
conditional or withdrawn) to make an alternative proposal,
|
|
|
|
thereafter, the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is terminated
by the Holdings Parties or the HPGP Parent Parties (as
applicable) because November 1, 2009 has passed, the
unitholders of Hiland Holdings failed to approve the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement or the Hiland Holdings merger or any
Holdings Party breached or failed to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements
contained in the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, and the
breach or failure to perform: (A) would constitute the
failure of a condition to the HPGP Parent Parties
obligations to complete the merger and (B) is not capable
of being satisfied or cured by November 1, 2009 or, if
capable of being satisfied or cured, is not satisfied or cured
by thirty days following receipt by the Holdings Parties of
written notice stating the HPGP Parent Parties intention
to terminate the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, and
|
|
|
|
a Holdings Party enters into a definitive agreement with respect
to, or consummates, a transaction contemplated by any
alternative proposal within twelve months of the date the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement is terminated,
|
then Hiland Holdings must pay to Parent all of the expenses of
the HPGP Parent Parties, up to $800,000; provided that no
expense for which a HPGP Parent Party has received reimbursement
pursuant to the Hiland
18
Partners merger agreement shall be paid pursuant to this
reimbursement obligation. See The Hiland Holdings Merger
Agreement Reimbursement of Certain Expenses,
beginning on page 168.
Effect
of Termination; Remedies
In the event of termination of either merger agreement as
summarized above under Termination of the
Merger Agreements, the applicable merger agreement will
terminate, except for certain provisions including the provision
relating to reimbursement of expenses summarized above, and
there shall be no liability on the part of the Hiland Parties or
the Holdings Parties, as the case may be, or the HLND Parent
Parties or HPGP Parent Parties, as the case may be, to the other
except as provided in the provision relating to reimbursement of
expenses summarized above. No such termination, however, shall
relieve any party from liability arising out of any willful
breach of any of the representations, warranties or covenants in
the applicable merger agreement (subject to any express
limitations set forth in such merger agreement), in which case
the aggrieved party shall be entitled to all rights and remedies
available at law or in equity.
See The Hiland Partners Merger Agreement
Effect of Termination; Remedies beginning on page 149
and The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement
Effect of Termination; Remedies beginning on page 168.
Financing
of the Mergers
The mergers will be financed entirely with cash contributed by
Mr. Hamm and the Hamm family trusts to Parent and the
Merger Subs. There is no financing condition to the obligations
of Mr. Hamm and his affiliates to consummate the
transactions.
Mr. Hamm has delivered to Parent a funding commitment
letter related to the Hiland Partners merger, which we refer to
in this joint proxy statement as the Hiland Partners
commitment letter, pursuant to which Mr. Hamm has
committed to contribute approximately $32.0 million to
Parent prior to the closing of the Hiland Partners merger,
representing the aggregate Hiland Partners merger consideration
plus related fees and expenses. Under the Hiland Partners
commitment letter, Mr. Hamms funding commitment is
reduced by the amount of cash, if any, contributed by the Hamm
family trusts to fund the Hiland Partners merger. Pursuant to
its terms, Hiland Partners is a third-party beneficiary of the
Hiland Partners commitment letter.
Mr. Hamm has also delivered to Parent a funding and equity
rollover commitment letter related to the Hiland Holdings
merger, which we refer to in this joint proxy statement as the
Hiland Holdings commitment letter, pursuant to which
Mr. Hamm has committed to contribute approximately
$21.2 million to Parent prior to the closing of the Hiland
Holdings merger, representing the aggregate Hiland Holdings
merger consideration plus related fees and expenses. Under the
Hiland Holdings commitment letter, Mr. Hamms funding
commitment is reduced by the amount of cash, if any, contributed
by the Hamm family trusts to fund the Hiland Holdings merger.
Pursuant to its terms, Hiland Holdings is a third-party
beneficiary of the Hiland Holdings commitment letter. See
Special Factors Financing of the Mergers
beginning on page 124.
No
Solicitation of Competing Proposals
The merger agreements generally restrict the ability of each of
the Hiland Companies and their respective general partners to,
among other things, solicit or engage in discussions or
negotiations with a third party regarding specified transactions
involving the Hiland Companies or their respective subsidiaries
and each of the Hiland Companies Board of Directors
or their respective Conflicts Committees ability to change
or withdraw its recommendation of its respective merger
agreement. Notwithstanding these restrictions, under
circumstances specified in the merger agreements, each Hiland
Company may respond to an unsolicited alternative
proposal as the term is defined in the sections entitled
The Hiland Partners Merger Agreement Other
Covenants and Agreements No Solicitation and
The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement Other
Covenants and Agreements No Solicitation, so
long as it complies with the terms of the applicable merger
agreement. Each Hiland Company Board of Directors or Conflicts
Committee may also withdraw its recommendation of its respective
merger agreement which it had previously recommended if it
determines in good faith, after consultation with its respective
outside counsel and financial advisors, that doing so would be
in the best interests of the public unitholders of the
respective Hiland Company. See The
19
Hiland Partners Merger Agreement Other Covenants and
Agreements No Solicitation, beginning on
page 140 and The Hiland Holdings Merger
Agreement Other Covenants and Agreements
No Solicitation, beginning on page 158.
No
Appraisal Rights
Holders of Hiland Partners common units and Hiland Holdings
common units are not entitled to dissenters rights of
appraisal under their respective partnership agreements or
applicable Delaware law.
Material
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
The Hiland Partners merger and the Hiland Holdings merger will
each be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax
purposes (and also may be taxed under applicable foreign, state
and local tax laws). For U.S. federal income tax purposes,
a common unitholder receiving merger consideration will
recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference, if
any, between (1) the amount realized by that common
unitholder (equal to the sum of the merger consideration
received and the common unitholders share of the
respective Hiland Companys nonrecourse liabilities) as a
result of the applicable Hiland Company merger and (2) that
common unitholders adjusted tax basis in its common units
of the respective Hiland Company. Moreover, because a portion
(which will likely be substantial) of a common unitholders
gain or loss will be separately computed and taxed as ordinary
income, a common unitholder may recognize both ordinary income
and a capital loss as a result of the mergers. For an
explanation of the amount realized and the character of any gain
recognized by a common unitholder as a result of the mergers and
more information regarding the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the mergers, see Special
Factors Material United States Federal Income Tax
Considerations beginning on page 116.
The tax consequences of the mergers to you will depend upon your
own personal circumstances. You should consult your tax advisors
for a full understanding of the U.S. federal, state, local
and foreign tax consequences of the mergers to you.
20
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGERS AND THE SPECIAL MEETINGS
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Where and when are the special meetings? |
|
A: |
|
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings will hold separate special
meetings of common unitholders. Hiland Partners will hold a
special meeting of common unitholders
on ,
2009 at , local time,
at . Hiland Holdings will hold a
special meeting of common unitholders
on ,
2009 at , local time,
at . |
|
Q: |
|
What am I being asked to vote on? |
|
A: |
|
If you are a holder of common units of Hiland Partners, you are
being asked to approve the Hiland Partners merger agreement and
the Hiland Partners merger, pursuant to which an entity created
by the Hamm Continuing Investors will merge with and into Hiland
Partners and each common unit of Hiland Partners not held by the
Hiland Holdings rollover common unitholders will be converted
into the right to receive $7.75 in cash. If you are a holder of
common units of Hiland Holdings, you are being asked to approve
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
merger, pursuant to which an entity created by the Hamm
Continuing Investors will merge with and into Hiland Holdings
and each common unit of Hiland Holdings not held by the Hiland
Holdings rollover common unitholders will be converted into the
right to receive $2.40 in cash. After the mergers, Hiland
Partners and Hiland Holdings will be privately-owned companies,
owned by the Hamm Continuing Investors and you will have no
interest in either entity. |
|
Q: |
|
Does the Hiland Partners Board of Directors recommend
approval of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland
Partners merger? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The Hiland Partners Board of Directors and the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee recommend that the Hiland Partners
public unitholders approve the Hiland Partners merger agreement
and the Hiland Partners merger. |
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, comprised of two
independent directors, was authorized to review and evaluate the
acquisition proposal from Harold Hamm and any potential
alternatives thereto, and unanimously determined that the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger are
advisable, fair to and in the best interests of, Hiland Partners
and the Hiland Partners public unitholders and approved the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger.
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee recommended that the
full Hiland Partners Board of Directors approve the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger and
recommends that the Hiland Partners public unitholders approve
the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger. |
|
|
|
After considering various factors, including the unanimous
recommendation of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors: |
|
|
|
has determined that the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the Hiland Partners merger are advisable, fair to,
and in the best interests of, Hiland Partners and the Hiland
Partners public unitholders;
|
|
|
|
has approved the Hiland Partners merger agreement
and the Hiland Partners merger; and
|
|
|
|
recommends that the Hiland Partners public
unitholders approve the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the
Hiland Partners merger.
|
|
Q: |
|
Does the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors recommend
approval of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland
Holdings merger? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The Hiland Holdings Board of Directors and the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee recommend that the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders approve the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings merger. |
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, comprised of two
independent directors, was authorized to review and evaluate the
acquisition proposal from Mr. Hamm and any potential
alternatives thereto, and unanimously determined that the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement is advisable, fair to, and in the best |
21
|
|
|
|
|
interests of, Hiland Holdings and the Hiland Holdings public
unitholders and approved the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings merger. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee recommended that the full Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors approve the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
Hiland Holdings merger and recommends that the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders approve the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings merger. |
|
|
|
After considering various factors, including the unanimous
recommendation of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, the
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors: |
|
|
|
has determined that the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger are advisable, fair to,
and in the best interests of, Hiland Holdings and the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders;
|
|
|
|
has approved the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings merger; and
|
|
|
|
recommends that the Hiland Holdings public
unitholders approve the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
Hiland Holdings merger.
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the interests of the members of the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors and the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
and the executive officers of the Hiland Companies in the
mergers? |
|
A: |
|
Members of each Hiland Company Board of Directors and the shared
executive officers of the Hiland Companies have interests in the
mergers that are different from yours, including, in some cases,
a continuing ownership interest in the surviving entities
following consummation of the mergers, as well as other
interests described in this joint proxy statement. We encourage
you to review the section entitled Special
Factors Interests of Certain Persons in the
Mergers, beginning on page 108, for a full discussion
of their interests. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen to the restricted common units, phantom
units and unit option awards in the Hiland Companies held by
directors, officers and employees of the Hiland Companies? |
|
A: |
|
Restricted common units of the Hiland Companies held by
non-employee members of either Hiland Company Board of Directors
will vest immediately prior to the effective time of the
applicable merger and automatically convert into the right to
receive the applicable merger consideration. Other restricted
common units, phantom units and unit option awards issued
pursuant to the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan or
the Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan that are
outstanding as of the effective time of the applicable merger
will remain outstanding in accordance with their respective
terms as equity awards in the surviving entity in the applicable
Hiland Company merger. Please see Special
Factors Interests of Certain Persons in the
Mergers, beginning on page 108. |
|
Q: |
|
If I own common units in each of the Hiland Companies, can I
vote for one merger and against the other merger? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Although this joint proxy statement relates to both going
private transactions, each special meeting is separate and if
you own common units in each of Hiland Partners and Hiland
Holdings, you may vote in favor of both mergers, against both
mergers, in favor of one merger and against the other merger or
abstain from voting on one or both mergers. If only one merger
is approved by the unitholders, provided that the other merger
was voted down by the unitholders, Parent and the applicable
Merger Sub may waive the condition that both mergers be closed
concurrently and choose to close the approved merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the record dates for the special meetings? |
|
A: |
|
The record date for the special meeting of Hiland Partners and
for the special meeting of Hiland Holdings
is ,
2009. Only holders of Hiland Partners common units or Hiland
Holdings common units, as applicable, at the close of business
on the record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at,
the special meeting of the Hiland Company in which they own
common units or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
22
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum for the special meetings? |
|
A: |
|
At the special meeting of each Hiland Company, the presence, in
person or by proxy, of unitholders entitled to cast a majority
of the votes entitled to be cast by the unitholders will
constitute a quorum. Where a separate class vote is required, a
quorum will consist of the majority of votes entitled to be cast
by the unitholders of the class entitled to vote with respect to
that matter. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
After carefully reading and considering the information
contained in this joint proxy statement (including its annexes
and the documents referenced under Where You Can Find More
Information) please vote by completing, signing and
mailing your proxy card or by voting via telephone or the
Internet as soon as possible so that your units can be
represented at the special meeting of the Hiland Company in
which you own units. Your vote is important. Whether or not you
plan to attend the special meeting, you should sign and mail
your proxy card or vote via telephone or the Internet at your
first convenience. Remember, if you fail to vote your units,
that will have the same effect as a vote against the
approval of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland
Partners merger (if you are a holder of Hiland Partners common
units) or the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland
Holdings merger (if you are a holder of Hiland Holdings common
units). |
|
Q: |
|
If I hold a unit certificate, should I send in my unit
certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. After the applicable merger is completed, you will be
sent a letter of transmittal with detailed written instructions
for exchanging your common unit certificates for the cash merger
consideration. If your common units are held in street
name by your broker, bank or other nominee, you will
receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee as
to how to effect the surrender of your street name
common units in exchange for the merger consideration. Please
do not send in your certificates now. |
|
Q: |
|
If my common units are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker vote my units for me? |
|
A: |
|
Your broker will vote your common units for you only if you
provide your broker with your specific voting instructions. You
should follow the directions provided by your broker to vote
your common units, including instructions for telephone and
Internet voting. Without your instructions your common units in
either Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings will not be voted,
which will have the same effect as a vote against
the approval of the applicable merger agreement and merger.
Please make certain to return your proxy or voting instruction
card for each separate account you maintain to ensure that all
of your common units in the Hiland Companies are voted. |
|
Q: |
|
May I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy
card? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may change your vote by delivering a written notice
stating that you would like to revoke your proxy or by executing
and submitting a new, later dated proxy to the Secretary of the
Hiland Company in which you own common units before the special
meeting of that Hiland Company. You also may revoke your proxy
by attending the special meeting and voting your common units in
person. If your common units are held in street name, you must
contact your broker or bank and follow the directions provided
to change your voting instructions. |
|
Q: |
|
May I vote in person? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. If you are the record holder of your common units, you may
attend the special meeting for the Hiland Company in which you
own common units and vote your common units in person, rather
than signing and returning your proxy card. If your shares are
held in street name, you must get a proxy from your
broker, bank or nominee in order to attend the special meeting
and vote your common units in person. Even if you plan to attend
the special meeting, we encourage you to sign and deliver a
proxy card, which will not prevent you from attending the
special meeting and voting your common units in person. |
23
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card or vote
instruction card? |
|
A: |
|
If your common units in either of the Hiland Companies are
registered differently or are in more than one account, you will
receive more than one card for that Hiland Company. In addition,
if you own common units in each of the Hiland Companies, you
will receive at least one card for each Hiland Company. Please
complete and return all of the proxy cards or vote instruction
cards you receive (or submit your proxy by telephone or the
Internet, if available to you) to ensure that all of your common
units in either Hiland Company are voted. |
|
Q: |
|
Who will bear the cost of this solicitation? |
|
A: |
|
The Hiland Companies will pay the cost of this solicitation,
which will be made primarily by mail. Proxies also may be
solicited in person, or by telephone, facsimile or similar
means, by the directors, officers or employees of the Hiland
Companies without additional compensation. In addition, will
provide solicitation services to the Hiland Companies for a fee
of approximately $ plus out-of-pocket expenses. The Hiland
Companies will, on request, reimburse holders of common units
who are brokers, banks or other nominees for their reasonable
expenses in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of
the common units they hold of record. |
|
Q: |
|
Am I entitled to appraisal or dissenters rights? |
|
A: |
|
No. Holders of Hiland Partners common units and Hiland
Holdings common units are not entitled to dissenters
rights of appraisal under their respective partnership agreement
or applicable Delaware law. |
|
Q: |
|
Will I owe taxes as a result of the mergers? |
|
A: |
|
The Hiland Partners merger and the Hiland Holdings merger will
each be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax
purposes (and also may be taxed under applicable foreign, state
and local tax laws). For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a
common unitholder receiving merger consideration will recognize
gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference, if any,
between (1) the amount realized by that common unitholder
(equal to the sum of the merger consideration received and the
common unitholders share of the respective Hiland
Companys nonrecourse liabilities) as a result of the
applicable Hiland Company merger and (2) the common
unitholders adjusted tax basis in its common units of the
respective Hiland Company. Moreover, because a portion (which
will likely be substantial) of a common unitholders gain
or loss will be separately computed and taxed as ordinary
income, a common unitholder may recognize both ordinary income
and a capital loss as a result of the mergers. Please refer to
the section entitled Special Factors Material
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations, beginning
on page 116, for a more detailed explanation of the U.S.
federal income tax consequences of the mergers. You should
consult your tax advisor on the specific tax consequences of the
mergers to you. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect the mergers to be completed? |
|
A: |
|
The Hiland Companies are working to complete the mergers as
quickly as possible after the special meetings if each of the
merger agreements are approved at the special meetings. The
Hiland Companies hope to complete the mergers during the third
quarter of 2009, although there can be no assurance that they
will be able to do so. |
|
Q: |
|
What conditions are required to be fulfilled to complete the
mergers? |
|
A: |
|
The parties to each of the merger agreements are not required to
complete their respective mergers unless certain specified
conditions are satisfied or waived. These conditions include,
among others, (i) the absence of any restraining order,
preliminary or permanent injunction or other order by any court
of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or
prohibition enacted or promulgated by any governmental entity
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation
of the mergers, (ii) receipt of certain regulatory
approvals or expiration of required waiting periods,
(iii) the accuracy of the parties representations and
warranties except (subject to certain specified exceptions) to
the extent that the failure of such representations and
warranties to be accurate (without regard to qualifications or
exceptions as to materiality or material adverse effect) would
not have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect with |
24
|
|
|
|
|
respect to the parties making such representations and
warranties; (iv) compliance by the parties with their
obligations under the applicable merger agreement, including the
covenants that restrict the conduct of the applicable Hiland
Companys business; (v) no material adverse effect
occurring with respect to Hiland Partners or its business or
Hiland Holdings or its business, as applicable; and
(vi) except under specified circumstances, the concurrent
completion of the other Hiland Company merger. |
|
|
|
In addition, completion of the Hiland Partners merger is
conditioned upon approval of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the Hiland Partners merger by (i) holders of
a majority of the Hiland Partners common units owned by Hiland
Partners public unitholders entitled to vote thereon voting as a
class and (ii) holders of a majority of the outstanding
subordinated units of Hiland Partners entitled to vote thereon
voting as a class. The Hiland Holdings merger is conditioned
upon approval of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
Hiland Holdings merger by (i) holders of a majority of the
Hiland Holdings common units owned by Hiland Holdings public
unitholders entitled to vote thereon voting as a class and
(ii) holders of a majority of the outstanding common units
of Hiland Holdings entitled to vote thereon voting as a class.
Consummation of the mergers is not subject to a financing
condition. |
|
|
|
There can be no assurance that these or the other conditions to
consummation of the mergers will be satisfied or waived. For a
more complete summary of conditions that must be satisfied or
waived prior to the effective time of such merger, see The
Hiland Partners Merger Agreement Conditions to
Completion of the Hiland Partners Merger, beginning on
page 147 and The Hiland Holdings Merger
Agreement Conditions to Completion of the Hiland
Holdings Merger, beginning on page 165. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen if only one of the merger agreements and
related mergers are approved by unitholders? |
|
|
|
If each Hiland Company merger agreement and Hiland Company
merger is submitted to a vote of the unitholders of the
applicable Hiland Company and only one of the Hiland Company
merger agreements and Hiland Company mergers are approved, then,
if all other conditions are either satisfied or waived, Parent
and the applicable Merger Sub will have the option of completing
only the Hiland Company merger that has been approved. |
|
|
|
For more information, please see The Hiland Partners
Merger Agreement Conditions to Completion of the
Hiland Partners Merger beginning on page 147 and
The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement
Conditions to Completion of the Hiland Holdings Merger
beginning on page 165. |
|
Q: |
|
What if the proposed mergers are not completed? |
|
A: |
|
It is possible that the proposed mergers will not be completed.
The mergers will not be completed if all closing conditions are
not satisfied or waived. If the mergers are not completed,
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings will each remain an
independent public company, and the common units of Hiland
Partners and Hiland Holdings will continue to be listed and
traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Under specified
circumstances, if the mergers are not completed, Hiland
Partners, Hiland Holdings or each of the Hiland Companies may be
required to reimburse Parent for certain expenses associated
with the mergers, up to an aggregate amount of
$1.9 million. Please see The Hiland Partners Merger
Agreement Reimbursement of Certain Expenses
and The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement
Reimbursement of Certain Expenses, beginning on
page 150 and 168, respectively. |
|
Q: |
|
Why is my vote important? |
|
A: |
|
Among other required votes, the Hiland Partners merger agreement
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the Hiland Partners common units held by Hiland Partners public
unitholders and the Hiland Holdings merger agreement requires
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Hiland
Holdings common units held by Hiland Holdings public
unitholders. Because each of these votes is based upon a
majority of the outstanding common units held by the public
unitholders of the respective Hiland Company, your failure to
vote or your abstention from voting will have the same effect as
a vote against the approval of the Hiland Partners
merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger or the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger, as
applicable. Additionally, because |
25
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreements provide that the obligation of Parent and
the applicable Merger Sub to complete either of the mergers is
conditioned on, among other things, the concurrent completion of
the other merger, it is not certain that either merger will be
completed without, among other things, the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of (i) the outstanding Hiland
Partners common units held by the Hiland Partners public
unitholders entitled to vote thereon voting as a class and
(ii) the outstanding Hiland Holdings common units held by
the Hiland Holdings public unitholders entitled to vote thereon
voting as a class. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can help answer my questions? |
|
A: |
|
If you have any questions about the mergers, need additional
copies of this joint proxy statement or the enclosed proxy card,
or require assistance in voting your common units, you should
contact , which is assisting us as the
proxy solicitation agent in connection with the mergers, as
follows: |
26
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement, including information set forth or
incorporated by reference in this document, contains statements
that constitute forward-looking information, including
disclosures relating to the mergers, projected financial
information, valuation information, possible outcomes from
strategic alternatives other than the mergers, the expected
amounts, timing and availability of financing, availability
under credit facilities, levels of capital expenditures, sources
of funds, and funding requirements, among others. You are
cautioned that such forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance or results and involve risks
and uncertainties and that actual results or developments may
differ materially from the forward-looking statements as a
result of various factors. Factors that may cause such
differences to occur include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
with respect to the mergers: (1) the occurrence of any
event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the
termination of the merger agreements or the failure of required
conditions to close the mergers; (2) the outcome of any
legal proceedings that have been or may be instituted against
Hiland Partners
and/or
Hiland Holdings and others; (3) the inability to obtain
unitholder approval or the failure to satisfy other conditions
to completion of the mergers, including the receipt of certain
regulatory approvals; (4) risks that the proposed
transaction disrupts current plans and operations and the
potential difficulties in employee retention as a result of the
mergers; (5) the performance of Parent, Merger Subs and the
Hamm Continuing Investors and (6) the amount of the costs,
fees, expenses and charges related to the mergers;
|
|
|
|
any of the assumptions underlying the Hiland Companies
projected financial information proving to be inaccurate;
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Hiland Companies to comply with certain
covenants in their respective credit facilities, including under
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Hiland Companies to pay distributions to
their respective unitholders;
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners cash flow is affected by the volatility of
natural gas and NGL product prices, which could adversely affect
Hiland Partners ability to make distributions to its
unitholders, including Hiland Holdings;
|
|
|
|
Hiland Holdings expected receipt of distributions from
Hiland Partners;
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners continued ability to find and contract for
new sources of natural gas supply;
|
|
|
|
the general economic conditions in the United States of America
as well as the general economic conditions and currencies in
foreign countries;
|
|
|
|
the amount of natural gas gathered on Hiland Partners
gathering systems;
|
|
|
|
the level of throughput in Hiland Partners natural gas
processing and treating facilities;
|
|
|
|
the fees Hiland Partners charges and the margins realized for
its services;
|
|
|
|
the prices and market demand for, and the relationship between,
the prices of natural gas and NGLs;
|
|
|
|
energy prices generally;
|
|
|
|
the level of domestic crude oil and natural gas production;
|
|
|
|
the availability of imported crude oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
actions taken by foreign crude oil and natural gas producing
nations;
|
|
|
|
the political and economic stability of petroleum producing
nations;
|
|
|
|
the weather in Hiland Partners operating areas;
|
|
|
|
the extent of governmental regulation and taxation;
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
hazards or operating risks incidental to the gathering, treating
and processing of natural gas and NGLs that may not be fully
covered by insurance;
|
|
|
|
competition from other midstream companies;
|
|
|
|
loss of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
the availability and cost of capital and Hiland Partners
ability to access certain capital sources;
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and regulations to which Hiland Holdings and
Hiland Partners are subject, including tax, environmental,
transportation and employment regulations;
|
|
|
|
the costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings;
|
|
|
|
the ability to successfully identify and consummate strategic
acquisitions at purchase prices that are accretive to the Hiland
Partners financial results; and
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the construction of new pipelines and
treating and processing facilities or additions to Hiland
Companies existing pipelines and facilities;
|
|
|
|
the completion of significant, unbudgeted expansion projects may
require debt and/or equity financing which may not be available
to Hiland Partners on acceptable terms, or at all;
|
|
|
|
increases in interest rates could increase Hiland Partners
borrowing costs, adversely impact its unit price and its ability
to issue additional equity, which could have an adverse effect
on Hiland Partners cash flows and its ability to fund its
growth; and
|
|
|
|
the other factors described in each of the Hiland
Companies
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, including
under the sections entitled Risk Factors and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained therein.
|
The Hiland Companies disclaim any obligation to update or revise
the forward-looking statements contained herein, except as
otherwise required by applicable federal securities laws. A
Transaction Statement on
Schedule 13E-3
filed with the SEC with respect to each of the proposed mergers
(each a
Schedule 13E-3)
will be amended to report any material changes in the
information set forth in the most recent
Schedule 13E-3
filed with the SEC by either Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings.
28
SPECIAL
FACTORS
Background
of the Mergers
Overview
It is part of the Hiland Companies business strategy to
consistently evaluate strategic alternatives in an effort to
maximize unitholder value as the Hiland Companies, and the
environment in which they operate, evolve.
Like many natural gas gathering and processing companies, Hiland
Partners earnings and cash flows are impacted by changes
in commodity prices. The margins generated under some of Hiland
Partners gathering and processing contracts fluctuate
based on the price of natural gas and NGLs and, in some cases,
the relationship between the price of natural gas and NGLs.
Hiland Partners systems are also dependent on the level of
production from crude oil and natural gas wells that supply
natural gas to its systems. Production from wells naturally
declines over time. Accordingly, in order to maintain or
increase throughput levels on its gathering systems, Hiland
Partners must continually obtain new supplies of natural gas
from newly drilled wells near its gathering systems.
Fluctuations in energy prices, as well as the accessibility of
capital to fund drilling, can greatly affect the level of
drilling activity by producers.
Beginning in the third quarter of 2008, fears of an economic
recession, a significant reduction in the availability of credit
nationwide and significant declines in crude oil, natural gas
and NGLs prices from highs experienced in 2008 led to a sell-off
by investors in master limited partnerships, or
MLPs, particularly ones that face commodity price
exposure in their business, such as gathering and processing
MLPs like Hiland Partners. This sell-off intensified shortly
after the mid-September bankruptcy filing of Lehman Brothers,
Inc., which worsened the global credit crisis.
In the late summer and fall of 2008, commodity prices declined
precipitously. The prompt month New York Mercantile Exchange, or
NYMEX, crude oil price declined from a record high of $145.18
per barrel on July 14, 2008 to $67.81 per barrel on
October 31, 2008. The prompt month NYMEX natural gas price
was halved from $13.51 per MMBtu on July 1, 2008 to $6.75
per MMBtu on October 31, 2008. And the OPIS Conway NGL
simple average price more than halved, from $2.08 per gallon on
July 17, 2008 to a closing price of $0.89 per gallon on
October 31, 2008.
Accordingly, like most gathering and processing MLPs, both
Hiland Partners common unit price and Hiland
Holdings common unit price declined significantly in the
third quarter. For example, Hiland Partners common unit
price declined from $49.26, or at a 7.00% yield to investors
based on the most recent quarterly distribution (on an
annualized basis) (yield), on July 1, 2008, and
to $26.06 by October 31, 2008, representing a 13.51% yield.
Likewise, Hiland Holdings common unit price declined from
$26.75, representing a 4.56% yield, as of July 1, 2008 to
$12.40, representing a 10.24% yield, as of October 31, 2008.
As a result of the decline in unit prices and the substantial
reduction in the availability of credit nationwide during this
period, the Hiland Companies cost of raising additional
capital increased significantly at a time when Hiland Partners
was pursuing its growth strategy of expanding organically,
including in the Bakken shale play in northwestern North Dakota
and at its Woodford Shale and Kinta gathering systems in
southeastern Oklahoma. During this time, management believed
that Hiland Partners had adequate capital resources to fund its
announced expansion projects and ongoing system expansions
without having to access the capital markets for debt or equity.
However, given the significant disruption in the capital
markets, the lack of access to debt capital and the uncertainty
regarding the direction of commodity prices, Joseph L. Griffin,
the President and Chief Executive Officer of each of the Hiland
Companies, and Matthew S. Harrison, the Chief Financial Officer
of each of the Hiland Companies, decided to review a number of
potential alternatives to more efficiently capitalize the
companies, to better position the companies to be able to adapt
to further changes in economic conditions, to fund future
unplanned expansion projects and to otherwise maximize
unitholder value. The alternatives considered included:
(i) raising equity capital, (ii) amending the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement to expand the borrowing capacity
thereunder, (iii) having Hiland Partners acquire Hiland
Holdings in a transaction that would result in Hiland Partners
owning its general partner and the
29
cancellation of the incentive distribution rights held by the
general partner and (iv) having Harold Hamm acquire the
Hiland Companies in going private transactions.
As of September 30, 2008, Hiland Partners had borrowed
$262.1 million against a borrowing base of
$300 million under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
In this regard, Messrs. Griffin and Harrison and
Mr. Derek Gipson, Director of Business Development and
Investor Relations of each of the Hiland Companies (who,
together with Messrs. Griffin and Harrison we sometimes
refer to as the management team), had a series of
formal discussions with representatives of MidFirst Bank and the
other lenders under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement during
October and November of 2008 regarding amendments to the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement, including expanding the borrowing
base under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement from
$300 million to $350 million. Based on these
discussions, management determined by mid-November that the
borrowing base could not be expanded on terms acceptable to
Hiland Partners at that time. In fact, through such discussions,
management learned that many lenders were looking for
opportunities to reduce their credit commitments to gathering
and processing companies.
On November 6, 2008, the Board of Directors of each of the
Hiland Companies held a regularly-scheduled board meeting. At
those meetings, Messrs. Griffin and Harrison discussed,
among other things, recent equity market conditions for the
Hiland Companies and their peers, including increases in yields,
changes in commodity prices and Hiland Partners commodity
price hedge position and the discussions management had with
MidFirst Bank regarding potentially expanding the borrowing base
under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. At those meetings,
Messrs. Griffin and Harrison also summarized
managements financial projections and estimates for the
2009 fiscal year, which included then-current forward pricing
estimates and lower growth capital expenditures planned for 2009
than in 2008 (the November Projections). In
particular, management advised each Board of Directors that,
based on the November Projections, the Hiland Companies were
expected to generate distribution growth and remain in
compliance with all financial covenants in the Hiland Operating
Credit Agreement through 2009.
On or about November 10, 2008, the management team spoke
telephonically with representatives of Barclays Capital to
informally discuss various potential capitalization
alternatives. The management team discussed several options,
including raising equity, expanding the borrowing base under the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, having Hiland Partners
acquire Hiland Holdings and going private transactions involving
Harold Hamm.
On November 12, 2008, Messrs. Griffin, Harrison and
Gipson met with representatives of Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
(Wachovia Securities) for a capital markets update.
During those discussions, the concept of potential going private
transactions was discussed and Wachovia Securities offered to do
some preliminary analytical work on various alternatives
available with respect to the Hiland Companies.
On November 14, 2008, management spoke telephonically with
representatives of Barclays Capital to further discuss potential
alternatives, with an emphasis on the alternative of having
Hiland Partners acquire Hiland Holdings.
On November 17, 2008, Messrs. Hamm, Griffin, Harrison
and Gipson met with representatives of Barclays Capital in Enid,
Oklahoma for an informal discussion. At the meeting, Barclays
Capital outlined various capitalization strategy alternatives,
including (i) maintaining the status quo, (ii) going
private transactions involving both Hiland Companies,
(iii) an acquisition of Hiland Holdings by Hiland Partners,
and (iv) a going private transaction involving only Hiland
Holdings. Meeting participants were provided written discussion
materials prepared by Barclays Capital that provided, as of the
date thereof, (a) an overview of the current financial
performance and position of each of the Hiland Companies,
(b) certain financial analyses based on assumed premiums
paid for the common units of Hiland Holdings, (c) certain
implications of the alternative transactions,
(d) preliminary timing of the various alternatives and
(e) an analysis of a then-pending MLP going private
transaction. The management team also discussed with Barclays
Capital the outlook for commodity pricing and reviewed with
Barclays Capital the November Projections and guidance to be
announced for the 2009 fiscal year (the Initial 2009
Guidance).
30
At the close of market on November 18, 2008, Hiland
Partners common unit price was $11.90, representing a
yield of 29.58%, and Hiland Holdings common unit price was
$5.34, representing a yield of 23.78%. Additionally, at the
close of market on November 18, 2008, the prompt month
NYMEX crude oil price was $54.39 per barrel, the prompt month
NYMEX natural gas price was $6.52 per MMBtu, and the OPIS Conway
NGL simple average price was $0.68 per gallon.
On November 18, 2008, the Hiland Companies issued a joint
press release announcing the Initial 2009 Guidance, which was
consistent with the November Projections, but updated to reflect
the most recently available forward commodity strip pricing. In
the release, Hiland Partners projected that 2009 earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) would range between $68 million and
$80 million based on the following assumptions, each of
which was noted in the press release: (i) $70.00 to $80.00
per barrel NYMEX crude oil pricing, (ii) $6.50 to $7.50 per
MMBtu NYMEX natural gas pricing, (iii) then-current
estimated forward quotes for natural gas pipeline basis
differentials and (iv) trailing
12-month
average NGL pricing correlations to crude oil, with all pricing
subject to Hiland Partners commodity hedging portfolio.
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please read
Non-GAAP Financial Measures of Hiland Partners.
The press release also noted that, despite the recent decline in
commodity prices, as of November 18, 2008, management did
not believe the Hiland Partners unit price reflected
Hiland Partners historical operating results or long-term
prospects for constructing and operating natural gas midstream
facilities. In particular, management mentioned, among other
things, that it continued to be encouraged by the increased rig
count in the Williston basin, along with increased initial
production rates from wells drilled on its North Dakota Bakken,
Montana Bakken and Woodford Shale dedicated acreage.
On November 18, 2008, Messrs. Hamm and Harrison
contacted Baker Botts L.L.P. (Baker Botts), in its
capacity as prospective counsel to Mr. Hamm, and discussed
the possibility of exploring transactions by which Mr. Hamm
would acquire the outstanding public common units of the Hiland
Companies and take the Hiland Companies private.
On November 20, 2008, Messrs. Hamm and Harrison met
with representatives of Baker Botts and Barclays Capital to
discuss further the possible buyout of public unitholders of the
Hiland Companies by Mr. Hamm. At this meeting, potential
acquisition structures for going private transactions and other
strategic and legal matters were discussed, including the
potential participation by the Hamm family trusts in the
transactions. Mr. Hamm informed Baker Botts that he wished
to engage the firm to represent him as legal counsel in the
potential transactions. Also available at the meeting were
written materials prepared by Barclays Capital supplementing
certain portions of Barclays Capitals November 17
presentation concerning going private transactions involving
both Hiland Companies. The November 20 materials included
preliminary valuation analyses of the Hiland Companies based on
managements projected financial results as of the date
thereof. However, Barclays Capital did not make a presentation
at the meeting nor were any preliminary valuations discussed.
Mr. Hamm later requested a fee proposal from Barclays
Capital for potential going private transactions, but he did not
pursue further engagement negotiations with Barclays Capital
thereafter and did not engage Barclays Capital as his financial
advisor, nor did Hiland Partners engage Barclays Capital.
From November 18 through December 5, 2008, crude oil,
natural gas and NGL prices continued to fall, with the prompt
month NYMEX crude oil price reaching $40.81 per barrel, a
decrease of $13.58, or 25%, and the prompt month NYMEX natural
gas price reaching $5.75 per MMBtu, a decrease of $0.77, or 11%,
on December 5, 2008. Also, the OPIS Conway NGL simple
average price reached $0.49 per gallon on December 5, 2008,
a decrease of $0.19, or 28%, from November 18, 2008. The
fractionation or frac spread, which represents the
difference in the cost of natural gas to be processed and the
value of the resulting NGL stream, decreased significantly
during that same period due to the comparatively greater
declines in the value of NGLs compared to natural gas. The
combination of the continued decline in commodity prices, the
credit crisis gripping the global economy and the further
sell-off in MLP securities caused the unit prices of the Hiland
Companies to further decline. By December 5, 2008, Hiland
Partners unit price had declined to $8.11 per unit and
Hiland Holdings unit price had declined to $2.78 per unit.
31
From November 21 through December 7, 2008,
Messrs. Griffin and Harrison had several discussions, with
the participation of Mr. Gipson in some cases, with Baker
Botts regarding potential going private transactions for the
Hiland Companies, including acquisition structures, tax matters,
debt covenant matters and potential transaction terms. During
these discussions, the management team, in consultation with
Baker Botts, determined that going private transactions with
Mr. Hamm would not trigger any change of control provision
under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. During the last
week of November 2008, Mr. Hamm also discussed with
Wachovia Securities his potential interest in pursuing going
private transactions. On December 1, 2008, Mr. Hamm
requested a fee proposal from Wachovia Securities to advise him
on potential going private transactions.
On December 5, 2008, Wachovia Securities met with
Messrs. Hamm, Griffin, Harrison and Gipson, during which
meeting Wachovia Securities made a presentation on its
qualifications to serve as financial advisor to Mr. Hamm in
connection with the going private transactions.
The
December 5 Special Meeting and Evaluation of
Alternatives
On December 5, 2008, Mr. Hamm called a special meeting
of the Board of Directors of each of the Hiland Companies to
discuss the continued significant decline in crude oil, natural
gas and NGL prices since the meeting of each Board of Directors
on November 6, 2008 and the effects the decline in prices
were having on the current and projected financial condition of
the Hiland Companies. At the special meetings,
Messrs. Griffin and Harrison presented managements
revised projections for the 2009 fiscal year (the December
Projections), which updated the November Projections to
reflect the most recently-available forward commodity strip
pricing for 2009.
Based upon forward commodity strip pricing for 2009, as of
December 1, 2008, management projected that EBITDA would
approximate $38 million in 2009, a decrease of
approximately $49 million from the November Projections.
The December Projections were based on the following commodity
price assumptions: (i) $57.72 per barrel NYMEX crude oil
pricing as compared to the $70.00 to $80.00 per barrel prices
used in connection with the Initial 2009 Guidance,
(ii) $6.73 per MMBtu NYMEX natural gas pricing as compared
to the $6.50 to $7.50 per MMBtu prices used in connection with
the Initial 2009 Guidance and (iii) $0.64 per gallon NGL
pricing for OPIS Conway compared to the $1.09 to $1.24 per
gallon prices used in connection with the Initial 2009 Guidance,
which were based on trailing
12-month
average NGL pricing correlations to crude oil, with all pricing
subject to Hiland Partners commodity hedging portfolio.
Management also informed the Board of Directors of each of the
Hiland Companies that if management had used current spot prices
as opposed to 2009 forward prices, expected EBITDA for 2009
would be approximately $45 million.
Additionally, management cautioned the Board of Directors of
each of the Hiland Companies that, if commodity prices did not
increase significantly from their stated assumptions, Hiland
Partners would likely violate one or more financial covenants
under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement as early as
June 30, 2009. In particular, management expressed concerns
about Hiland Partners ability to continue to meet the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreements required ratio of
consolidated funded debt to EBITDA (which we refer to as the
leverage ratio), on a trailing four-quarters basis,
of no greater than 4.0 to 1.0.
To avoid a situation in which Hiland Partners violated any of
its debt covenants under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement,
the Board of Directors of each of the Hiland Companies charged
management to begin exploring any and all alternatives,
including potential going private transactions.
Following the December 5, 2008 special meetings,
Messrs. Griffin and Harrison continued exploring various
capitalization alternatives and potential transactions, with the
principal consideration being the avoidance of a violation of
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. In this regard,
management continued to explore potential asset sales, the
issuance of equity or debt and the renegotiation of the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement, in addition to the going private
transactions.
Management estimated that, based on the December Projections,
Hiland Partners would have to raise a minimum of approximately
$120 million of equity capital to pay down sufficient debt
to ensure compliance with the leverage ratio covenant through
December 31, 2009. Management estimated that, because of
the rapid decline in unit prices of both Hiland Companies,
raising that much equity capital in the public markets would
32
result in significant dilution to existing unitholders and
likely trigger change of control provisions under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement. Additionally, the disruption in the
MLP markets raised questions as to whether Hiland Partners could
raise that level of equity. Thus, Mr. Hamm and management
also began to consider alternatives involving capital
contributions, primarily from Mr. Hamm, that would not
trigger change of control provisions under the Hiland Operating
Credit Agreement.
Also following the December 5, 2008 special meeting,
Messrs. Griffin, Harrison and Gipson contacted Wachovia
Securities to provide Wachovia Securities an update on the
December 5 special meeting, to convey that Mr. Hamm was
interested in further analysis of going private transactions and
to ask Wachovia to use the December Projections that management
had provided in its analysis.
On December 12, 2008, Messrs. Hamm, Griffin and Gipson
had discussions with MidFirst Bank, in which they provided
MidFirst Bank with an update on the Hiland Companies
business and financial position, including potential covenant
compliance issues under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement
during 2009.
On December 16, 2008 and again on December 18, 2008,
Wachovia Securities met telephonically with
Messrs. Griffin, Harrison, Gipson and Hamm (with
Mr. Hamm only participating in the December 18, 2008
meeting) to consider several strategic alternatives for the
Hiland Companies (which alternatives would need to avoid any
covenant defaults under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement).
Among the alternatives presented were maintaining the status
quo, renegotiating the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement to
achieve temporary covenant relief, selling certain existing
assets, issuing convertible securities or issuing new equity to
repay bank debt, merging with a third party to alleviate credit
concerns, and engaging in going private transactions led by
Mr. Hamm coupled with a capital contribution by
Mr. Hamm.
From December 19, 2008 to January 9, 2009,
Messrs. Hamm, Griffin, Harrison and Gipson continued to
analyze the strategic alternatives outlined by Wachovia
Securities. During this time, Mr. Hamm informed
Messrs. Griffin and Harrison that he personally remained
committed to the business of the Hiland Companies and the
retention of its employees even following going private
transactions.
On December 23, 2008, Hiland Partners common unit
price declined to a closing price of $3.80 and Hiland
Holdings common unit price declined to a closing price of
$1.97. The December 23, 2008 closing price was the
then-lowest closing price in its respective public trading
history.
Wachovia Securities met telephonically again with
Messrs. Griffin, Harrison and Gipson on four separate
occasions from January 5 to January 9, 2009 and with
Mr. Hamm on January 8, 2009 to further discuss
strategic alternatives. In addition to the previously analyzed
scenarios, which had been updated with more current financial
data, Wachovia Securities discussed a possible subordinated debt
issuance funded by Mr. Hamm and his affiliates to partially
repay bank debt. Among the alternatives analyzed, Mr. Hamm
concluded that going private transactions would enable the
public unitholders of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings to
receive cash in exchange for their investments in the Hiland
Companies while avoiding the significant dilution they would
experience in connection with an equity infusion that would
ultimately be necessary to stabilize the Hiland Companies. Later
on January 9, 2009, Messrs. Griffin and Harrison
informed representatives of Wachovia Securities and Baker Botts
that Mr. Hamm wished to proceed with making proposals to
the Boards of Directors of the Hiland Companies for the
acquisition by Mr. Hamm, certain of his affiliates and the
Hamm family trusts of all outstanding common units of the Hiland
Companies held by the public, as he believed that such a
transaction was the best strategic alternative currently
available to the Hiland Companies to maximize unitholder value.
On January 14, 2009, Messrs. Hamm, Griffin, Harrison
and Gipson met with Bert Mackie, the trustee of the Hamm family
trusts, and the beneficiaries of the Hamm DST Trust and informed
them that Mr. Hamm intended to propose going private
transactions involving the Hiland Companies. Mr. Mackie and
the beneficiaries indicated their support for such a proposal.
On January 14, 2009, Mr. Hamm engaged Wachovia
Securities as his financial advisor in connection with a
potential acquisition by Mr. Hamm and/or certain of his
affiliates of the assets or the capital stock of the Hiland
Companies.
33
The
January 15 Proposal
On the evening of January 14, 2009, Mr. Hamm called or
attempted to call each of the members of the Board of Directors
of each Hiland Company to inform them that he intended to
deliver the following day a proposal to acquire each of the
Hiland Companies in going private transactions.
On January 15, 2009, the Hiland Partners Board of Directors
received a letter from Mr. Hamm, on behalf of himself and
certain affiliates, proposing to take Hiland Partners private
for $9.50 per common unit in cash. Concurrently, the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors received a letter from
Mr. Hamm, on behalf of himself and certain affiliates,
proposing to take Hiland Holdings private for $3.20 per common
unit in cash (collectively, we refer to these proposals as the
January 15 Proposal). In the letters, Mr. Hamm
mentioned that he believed that, if the adverse impact of
commodity prices on gathering and processing fundamentals and
the challenges presented by the global economic crisis persist,
Hiland Partners would experience a meaningful decrease in future
distributable cash flow and would need substantial new equity
capital to remain in continued compliance with its debt
covenants. He also mentioned that obtaining such equity capital
in the current environment on acceptable terms did not appear
feasible and would be significantly dilutive to current
unitholders. Accordingly, Mr. Hamm stated that he was of
the view that going private transactions were the best strategic
alternative currently available to the Hiland Companies to
maximize unitholder value during a time of significant market
and industry turmoil.
In the January 15 Proposal, Mr. Hamm stated that he was
interested only in acquiring common units in the Hiland
Companies and that he was not interested in selling (or causing
his affiliates to sell) interests in the Hiland Companies. The
January 15 Proposal also stated that Mr. Hamm anticipated
that each of the Hiland Companies Board of Directors would
authorize its standing Conflicts Committee of independent
directors to retain its own legal and financial advisors and to
respond to the proposal on behalf of the Hiland Partners and
Hiland Holdings public unitholders.
On January 15, 2009, Hiland Holdings, the general partner
of Hiland Holdings, Parent and Messrs. Hamm, Griffin and
Harrison, having determined that they may be deemed to
constitute a group for Schedule 13D reporting
purposes, filed with the SEC a Schedule 13D with respect to
Hiland Partners, which included as exhibits each of the letters
containing the proposals to the respective Hiland Company Board
of Directors. That same day, Mr. Hamm, Continental Gas, and
Mr. Mackie, as trustee of the Hamm family trusts, as
members of a group for Schedule 13D reporting
purposes, filed with the SEC a Schedule 13D with respect to
Hiland Holdings, which included as exhibits each of the letters
containing the proposals to the respective Hiland Company Board
of Directors.
Updated
2009 Guidance
On January 26, 2009, the Hiland Companies issued a joint
press release announcing updated guidance for the 2009 fiscal
year. In the release, Hiland Partners projected that EBITDA
would range between $38 million and $50 million (the
Updated 2009 Guidance) based on the following
assumptions, each of which was noted in the press release:
(i) $45.00 to $55.00 per barrel NYMEX crude oil pricing,
(ii) $5.00 to $6.00 per MMBtu NYMEX natural gas pricing,
(iii) then-current estimated forward quotes for natural gas
pipeline basis differentials and (iv) trailing
12-month
average NGL pricing correlations to crude oil, with all pricing
subject to Hiland Partners commodity hedging portfolio.
The Updated 2009 Guidance also contemplated reduced drilling
activity in Hiland Partners service territories and lower
throughput volumes in Hiland Partners gathering systems as
compared to the Initial 2009 Guidance as a result of lower
commodity prices. As a result of the then current pricing
environment, particularly in combination with the constrained
capital and credit markets and overall economic downturn, Hiland
Partners began to experience a decline in drilling activity by
some producers in its areas of operations, resulting in lower
than expected volumes for 2009. In the release, the Hiland
Companies also noted that if commodity prices did not
significantly improve above the expected prices for 2009, Hiland
Partners might be in violation of the leverage ratio in the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement as early as June 30,
2009, unless the ratio was amended, the debt was restructured or
Hiland Partners received an infusion of equity capital to reduce
indebtedness. Additionally, the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors also announced a cash distribution for the fourth
quarter of 2008 of $0.45 per unit, which
34
represented a $0.43 per unit decrease from the prior quarter.
The Hiland Holdings Board of Directors announced a cash
distribution for the fourth quarter of 2008 of $0.10 per unit,
which represented a $0.2175 per unit decrease from the prior
quarter.
Authorization
of Conflicts Committees
On January 21, 2009, by order of Mr. Hamm, as the
Chairman of each of the Hiland Companies Board of
Directors, each of the Hiland Companies Board of Directors
held a special meeting to consider the January 15 Proposal. The
meetings were held consecutively, with the Hiland Partners Board
of Directors meeting in the morning and the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors meeting in the afternoon. At each of the
special meetings, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
(Vinson & Elkins), as outside counsel to
each of the Hiland Companies, reviewed with the directors their
duties and responsibilities under the respective partnership
agreements of the Hiland Companies and Delaware law, as well as
the process to be expected in connection with addressing the
January 15 Proposal. In addition, Wachovia Securities presented
an overview of the January 15 Proposal, including a review of
the factors that led to the proposal and the key terms of the
January 15 Proposal, to the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors.
With the assistance of Vinson & Elkins, the Hiland
Partners Board of Directors and the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors proceeded to consider the independence of each of the
members of their respective Conflicts Committees. At the Hiland
Partners January 21, 2009 special meeting, the Hiland
Partners Board of Directors considered the independence of
Mr. John T. McNabb II and Dr. David L. Boren, the
two members of the standing Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee.
At the outset of the consideration, Dr. Boren informed the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors that he would prefer to
resign from the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee out of
concerns that certain charitable ties between himself, his
employer (the University of Oklahoma) and Mr. Hamm could
give the appearance that Dr. Boren lacked independence. The
Hiland Partners Board of Directors then accepted
Dr. Borens resignation from the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee. In order to fill the vacancy on the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee, the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors reviewed the independence of the remaining board
members before nominating Mr. Shelby E. Odell. In
connection with his nomination to the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee, Mr. Odell agreed to resign from the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors. Mr. Odell tendered his
resignation on the afternoon of January 21, 2009 and the
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors accepted his resignation. The
Hiland Partners Board of Directors then determined that there
were no relationships that would interfere with the independence
of Mr. McNabb or Mr. Odell, subject to satisfactory
review of Mr. Odells completed director independence
questionnaire.
At the Hiland Holdings special meeting, the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors considered the independence of Dr. Bobby
B. Lyle and Dr. Cheryl L. Evans, the two members of the
standing Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee. The Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors determined that there were no
relationships that would interfere with the independence of
Dr. Lyle and Dr. Evans, subject to the confirmation of
certain information regarding certain business relationships
between Dr. Lyle, the Hiland Companies and Harold Hamm.
At the conclusion of each of the January 21 meetings, the Hiland
Partners Board of Directors and the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors each generally authorized their respective Conflicts
Committees to engage legal and financial advisors and begin
evaluating the January 15 Proposal and alternatives thereto,
with final authorization subject to finalization of authorizing
resolutions with their legal counsel and satisfactory
confirmation of the independence of Mr. Odell and
Dr. Lyle.
On February 19, 2009, each of the Hiland Companies Boards
of Directors held a special meeting to
follow-up on
the outstanding items from the January 21 meetings. After
reviewing all additional information and confirming the
independence of their respective Conflicts Committee members,
both the Hiland Partners Board of Directors and the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors determined to authorize their
respective standing Conflicts Committees to exercise certain
power and authority of the respective full Board of Directors
35
with respect to the January 15 Proposal or any revised proposal,
including the exclusive power and authority to:
|
|
|
|
|
review, evaluate and negotiate the terms and conditions of the
January 15 Proposal, including any modifications or amendments
thereto and any other similar proposal involving Hiland Partners
or Hiland Holdings, as applicable, and Mr. Hamm, his
affiliates or the Hamm family trusts;
|
|
|
|
review, evaluate and negotiate the terms and conditions of any
alternative to the January 15 Proposal;
|
|
|
|
determine whether the January 15 Proposal, any revised proposal
or any alternative thereto was advisable, fair to, and in the
best interests of, Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings, as
applicable, and its public unitholders and to recommend to the
full Board of Directors and the public unitholders of Hiland
Partners or Hiland Holdings, as applicable, what action, if any,
should be taken with respect to the January 15 Proposal, any
revised proposal or any alternative thereto; and
|
|
|
|
take any and all actions of Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings,
as applicable, with respect to the January 15 Proposal,
including reviewing, analyzing, evaluating, authorizing,
monitoring and exercising general oversight of all proceedings
and activities of Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings related to
the proposal any revised proposal or any alternative thereto.
|
Each of the Hiland Partners Board of Directors and the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors also resolved at its respective
special meeting that it would not recommend, authorize, approve
or endorse the January 15 Proposal or any other merger,
acquisition or similar proposal involving Hiland Partners or
Hiland Holdings, as applicable, and the Hamm Continuing
Investors or any of their affiliates unless such transaction was
recommended to such Board of Directors by its Conflicts
Committee. In addition, both the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors and the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors formalized
the authorization granted to their respective Conflicts
Committee during the January 21 meetings to retain the services
of its own legal and financial advisors at the expense of Hiland
Partners or Hiland Holdings, respectively.
The
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees Process and
Negotiations and Deliberations related to Hiland
Partners
Upon receiving initial authorization to hire legal and financial
advisors and begin considering the January 15 Proposal from the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors on January 21 as described
above, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee considered the
retention of legal and financial advisors and interviewed
potential candidates. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
spoke with three law firms and seven financial advisory firms.
After due consideration, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
selected Conner & Winters, LLP
(Conner & Winters) to serve as legal
counsel to the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and
Jefferies & Company for the purpose of providing a
fairness opinion to the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, in
light of both firms relevant industry experience and prior
representation of special committees and conflicts committees.
On January 29, 2009, the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee met formally for the first time following the January
21 Hiland Partners Board of Directors meeting. In addition to
Messrs. McNabb and Odell, representatives of
Conner & Winters attended the meeting. Mr. McNabb
acted as Chairman and Mr. Odell acted as Secretary of the
meeting (as well as all subsequent meetings of the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee). At such meeting, Mr. McNabb
reviewed with the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee the
delegation of authority and responsibility to the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee from the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors and the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees
mandate. Conner & Winters then reviewed with the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee the requirements to serve as
a member of such Conflicts Committee and questioned the members
of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee regarding matters
that might affect their independence. The Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee and counsel concluded that the members of
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee did not have any
relationships that would interfere with the exercise of their
independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as
members of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and further
that they met the independence standards and other requirements
to serve as members of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee.
Mr. McNabb recommended that the Hiland
36
Partners Conflicts Committee confirm the retention of
Conner & Winters as counsel and retain
Jefferies & Company. After concluding that both firms
were independent in the context of the January 15 Proposal, the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee unanimously ratified and
approved the retention by the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee of Conner & Winters and
Jefferies & Company in such capacities.
Conner & Winters then reviewed with the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee its duties and responsibilities
under the Hiland Partners partnership agreement with respect to
the January 15 Proposal. Conner & Winters further
briefed the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee on the
appropriate process guidelines to be followed by the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee. The Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee then generally discussed alternatives available to
Hiland Partners other than the January 15 Proposal, including
renegotiating the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, selling
assets, issuing debt or equity capital and merging with a third
party. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee reached the
preliminary conclusion that there were no viable alternatives,
but agreed to further examine all such alternatives later in the
process. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee then decided
that the most appropriate next step would be a meeting in Enid,
Oklahoma, in which management of the Hiland Companies would
brief the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and its counsel
and financial advisor on all pertinent matters relating to the
Hiland Companies.
During the latter part of January through the middle of February
2009, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and
Conner & Winters engaged in negotiations with
representatives of Jefferies & Company regarding the
terms of the engagement with Jefferies & Company,
which culminated in the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committees entering into an engagement letter with
Jefferies & Company on February 13, 2009.
On the evening of February 6, 2009, Baker Botts distributed
initial drafts of the Hiland Partners merger agreement, the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and related documents to
Conner & Winters, which forwarded them to the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee.
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee next met on
February 13, 2009, in conjunction with a management
briefing session in Enid, Oklahoma, in which management of the
Hiland Companies (including Messrs. Griffin, Harrison and
Gipson) provided a presentation of the current status of the
Hiland Companies, including financial and operating forecasts,
managements assessment of the Hiland Companies
credit arrangements and the likelihood that Hiland Partners
would violate the leverage ratio covenant in the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement as early as June 30, 2009.
Additionally, the management team reviewed the alternatives to
the January 15 Proposal explored by the management team,
including maintaining the status quo, renegotiating or replacing
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, selling Hiland
Partners assets or issuing debt or equity securities. Also
present at the February 13 meeting were representatives of
Barclays Capital and Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
(Fulbright), the financial and legal advisors,
respectively, to the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, since
the briefing session also covered matters relevant to Hiland
Holdings.
Following the briefing session, the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee discussed with Conner & Winters and
Jefferies & Company the next steps to be taken. It was
concluded that Jefferies & Company would review the
information received during the briefing session, obtain
additional information from management as advisable, conduct a
preliminary financial analysis of the January 15 Proposal and
report back to the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee. The
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee also formally approved the
engagement letter with Jefferies & Company. The Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee further discussed and also
clarified the role of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
with respect to the January 15 Proposal and the authority to be
delegated to the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee by the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors. Although the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee and its counsel had done a preliminary
review of the proposed Hiland Partners merger agreement, the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee decided to defer any
response or negotiations with respect to the Hiland Partners
merger agreement and the January 15 Proposal until
Jefferies & Company had an opportunity to complete its
preliminary financial analysis.
Following the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee meeting held
on February 13, 2009, Jefferies & Company
proceeded with a due diligence review of the Hiland Companies,
and in particular Hiland Partners, for purposes of conducting a
fairness analysis of the January 15 Proposal. In developing this
analysis, Jefferies & Company participated in several
telephone conferences with management of the Hiland Companies,
37
including with respect to the management teams financial
model and the projections underlying that financial model.
The depressed commodity price environment that began in the
fourth quarter of 2008 continued into the first quarter of 2009.
During the third week of February, the NYMEX crude oil contract
for March 2009 settled at $38.94 per barrel. In addition, for
the first quarter of 2009, the NYMEX crude oil last day settle
averaged $37.18 per barrel. Natural gas prices continued to
decline with the NYMEX natural gas contract for March 20009
settling at $4.06 per MMBtu during the third week of February,
which was 34% lower than the January 2009 NYMEX natural gas
settle price of $6.14 per MMBtu.
On February 26, 2009, the first of several lawsuits
challenging the January 15 Proposal and related matters was
filed. For more information regarding these lawsuits, please see
Special Factors Certain Legal Matters.
On March 3, 2009, Wachovia Securities met with
Mr. Hamm to review market developments since the January 15
Proposal and present updated analyses. Separately, Wachovia
Securities met with the management team to discuss certain of
its analyses which were based on the Hiland Companies most
recent financial projections and commodity price information.
In order to assess alternatives to the January 15 Proposal, on
March 5, 2009, Mr. McNabb met with representatives of
MidFirst Bank to determine what arrangements could be reached
with the lending group. Mr. Odell joined in this meeting
via telephone. During that meeting, representatives of MidFirst
Bank indicated that they were willing to discuss the
renegotiation of the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, but that
they were not encouraging about the possibility of renegotiating
or restructuring the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement on terms
that would present a viable alternative to the January 15
Proposal.
During a joint meeting of the Hiland Partners Board of Directors
and the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors later that day,
Mr. McNabb informed both Boards of Directors that members
of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee had met with
representatives of MidFirst Bank earlier that day and reported
his findings.
On March 6, 2009, Wachovia Securities met with
Messrs. Hamm and Mackie to discuss certain alternatives to
the going private transactions. Among the alternatives discussed
was a rights offering in which a right to subscribe for
additional Hiland Partners common units at a discount to the
public trading price would be distributed to each Hiland
Partners unitholder. Such rights would offer current unitholders
the opportunity to participate in an equity infusion in Hiland
Partners. In addition, Wachovia Securities discussed the
possible merger of Hiland Holdings with and into Hiland Partners
followed by a rights offering. During the meeting, Mr. Hamm
requested further information about a rights offering, and he,
Mr. Mackie and Wachovia Securities contacted Baker Botts to
request a preliminary analysis of potential legal implications
of a rights offering.
On March 10, 2009, Mr. Hamm and Rayford T. Reid, a
member of the Board of Directors of each of the Hiland
Companies, met with Messrs. Griffin and Harrison and
requested that they continue to pursue alternatives available to
the Hiland Companies with respect to the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement.
On March 14, 2009, Messrs. Hamm and Reid met
telephonically with Wachovia Securities to compare the proposed
going private transactions with both a stand-alone rights
offering by Hiland Partners and a merger of Hiland Holdings and
Hiland Partners followed by a rights offering. Wachovia
Securities also presented a case study for a recent amended
credit agreement of a midstream MLP and discussed the
possibility of negotiating with the lenders under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement.
Messrs. Hamm and Reid met telephonically with Wachovia
Securities on March 16, 2009 and again on March 17,
2009 to compare the proposed going private transactions with a
subordinated debt issuance funded by Mr. Hamm and his
affiliates. Later on March 17, 2009, Messrs. Hamm and
Harrison met with representatives of MidFirst Bank to discuss
the possibility of renegotiating the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement in the context of both of the proposed going private
transactions and a possible subordinated debt issuance.
38
From March 20 to March 23, 2009, Jefferies &
Company reviewed a new volume forecast from the Hiland Companies
and had several calls and discussions with Messrs. Griffin
and Harrison regarding this information.
The new volume forecasts were based on declines in commodity
prices which were resulting in substantially reduced drilling
activity along Hiland Partners systems. At this time,
Hiland Partners was experiencing the reduction in drilling
activity seen throughout the United States during this time
period. For example, U.S. natural gas drilling rig counts
declined by approximately 29% to 1,018 as of February 20,
2009, compared to 1,430 natural gas drilling rigs in the
comparable period of 2008, and approximately 37% compared to the
peak natural gas drilling rig count of 1,606 in August and
September 2008. Due to the substantial reduction in drilling
activity, Hiland Partners connected 10 new wells during the
first quarter of 2009 as compared to 24 wells during the fourth
quarter of 2008, representing a 58% decline.
On or about March 24, 2009, a representative of Wachovia
Securities indicated to Jefferies & Company that,
while Mr. Hamms offer with respect to the proposed
transaction was still outstanding, Mr. Hamm was not ready to
enter into direct negotiations at that time because he and
management were in ongoing discussions with MidFirst Bank
regarding the continued financing of the Hiland Companies
following the consummation of the transactions proposed in the
January 15 Proposal and that Mr. Hamm was considering other
alternatives for the Hiland Companies, including a capital
infusion into the Hiland Companies by him.
From March 25 to April 16, 2009, Jefferies &
Company continued to conduct its financial analyses with respect
to the January 15 Proposal and Conner & Winters
continued to evaluate the Hiland Partners merger agreement and
exchanged perspectives with Fulbright who had been evaluating
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement. During this period, on
April 1, 2009, management delivered updated 2009
projections to Jefferies & Company, which projections
reflected updated 2009 forward strip pricing and lower expected
natural gas volumes for 2009 than contained in managements
earlier projections as a result of a continued reduction in the
level of drilling activity in Hiland Partners areas of
operation.
On April 7, 2009, MidFirst Bank formally notified the
lenders under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement of requested
modifications to such credit agreement to increase the leverage
ratio under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement to
(i) 5.25 to 1.0 through June 30, 2010, (ii) 5.0
to 1.0 for the period from July 1, 2010 through
December 31, 2010, and (iii) 4.75 to 1.0 for the
period from January 1, 2011 to maturity. The modifications
would require Mr. Hamm to inject $50 million of equity
into Hiland Partners in conjunction with the consummation of the
going private transactions and would prohibit distributions
unless the leverage ratio was less than 4.25 to 1.0. The
modification would also require an amendment fee and increased
interest rates and was subject to formal documentation.
On April 16, 2009, Wachovia Securities met telephonically
with Messrs. Hamm, Reid and Mackie to review its financial
analysis of going private transactions in light of developments
in the market and the Hiland Companies financial outlook
since the January 15 Proposal. Messrs. Griffin, Harrison
and Gipson were invited to listen to Wachovia Securities
presentation and to provide an update on managements
negotiations with the lenders under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement.
On April 17, 2009, MidFirst Bank informed the management
team that it had received non-binding indications of interests
to the proposed modifications to the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement contained in the April 7, 2009 notice from the
required lenders (more than 50% of commitments). Subsequently,
MidFirst Bank informed management it had received non-binding
indications of interests to the proposed modifications to the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement from all lenders.
On April 17, 2009, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee,
together with Conner & Winters and representatives of
Jefferies & Company, met to review the status of the
fairness analysis of Jefferies & Company and review
and discuss the proposed Hiland Partners merger agreement.
Conner & Winters was instructed to complete a
mark-up of
the Hiland Partners merger agreement and, after review of the
mark-up by
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, provide it to Baker
Botts.
On April 20, 2009, both members of the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee received a telephone call from
Mr. Hamm, during which Mr. Hamm stated that he and his
representatives had engaged in lengthy
39
discussions with MidFirst Bank regarding the terms on which the
Hiland Companies lenders would agree to amend the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement in connection with the closing of the
acquisition of the Hiland Companies by Mr. Hamm and his
affiliates, as well as the adverse effect that continued
declines in commodity prices, particularly natural gas prices,
and drilling activity along Hiland Partners systems had on
the Hiland Companies current financial performance and
long-term prospects. In the call, Mr. Hamm stated that he
would no longer continue with the prior proposed offer of $9.50
per Hiland Partners common unit, based upon the terms under
which the lenders were willing to amend the existing credit
arrangements and the worsening outlook for the Hiland Companies.
Later that same day, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
received a letter from Mr. Hamm amending the January 15
Proposal. Under the revised terms proposed by Mr. Hamm,
holders of Hiland Partners common units (other than the Hiland
Partners rollover common unitholders) would receive $7.75 in
cash per common unit, reduced from $9.50 in cash per common unit
under the January 15 Proposal, and holders of Hiland Holdings
common units (other than the Hiland Holdings rollover common
unitholders) would receive $2.40 in cash per common unit,
reduced from $3.20 in cash per common unit under the January 15
Proposal (collectively, we refer to the revised proposal as the
April 20 Revised Proposal). In his letter reducing
the offered consideration, Mr. Hamm cited the adverse
effect that continued declines in natural gas prices and
drilling activity along Hiland Partners systems had had on
the Hiland Companies current and long-term projected
throughput volumes, midstream segment margins and cash flows
since the January 15 Proposal.
On April 21, 2009, Mr. Hamm, Parent, Hiland Holdings,
the general partner of Hiland Holdings, and Messrs. Griffin
and Harrison filed an amendment to their Schedule 13D with
the SEC, which included as exhibits Mr. Hamms
letters to each of the Conflicts Committees. The amendment also
included disclosures that Messrs. Griffin and Harrison had
agreed to participate in the going private proposals with the
Hamm Continuing Investors by agreeing to vote their Hiland
Partners common units in favor of the proposed Hiland Partners
merger.
On April 24, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
and the Hiland Partners Board of Directors both unanimously
voted to suspend quarterly distributions with respect to each
entitys partnership units beginning with the first quarter
distribution of 2009, based on each of the Hiland Companies
Board of Directors consideration of the impact of lower
commodity prices and drilling activity on Hiland Partners
current and projected throughput volumes, midstream segment
margins and cash flows, as well as future required levels of
capital expenditures and the level of Hiland Partners
outstanding indebtedness under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement.
From April 20 through April 30, 2009, Conner &
Winters had a number of telephone conferences with Fulbright and
with counsel and management of the general partner of Hiland
Partners regarding the current status of discussions with the
Hiland Companies bank group. On April 30, 2009,
Conner & Winters, Fulbright and Barclays Capital
participated in a call with Messrs. Griffin and Harrison
regarding the status of Hiland Partners discussions with
MidFirst Bank and the potential violation of the leverage ratio
covenant under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
Mr. Harrison reported that MidFirst Bank was still willing
to discuss an amendment or waiver, but as it had previously
informed Mr. Harrison, such an amendment would involve high
up-front fees, a significant increase in the interest rate and
the indefinite suspension of distributions by Hiland Partners.
Additionally, Mr. Harrison reported that, while MidFirst
Bank had indicated that it might grant a temporary waiver for
the potential leverage ratio covenant violation if the proposed
transaction did not close prior to the default, it would not
agree to do so in advance.
On April 28, 2009, Baker Botts distributed revised drafts
of the Hiland Partners merger agreement, the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and related documents to the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee, Jefferies & Company and
Conner & Winters.
On May 1, 2009, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee met
to discuss the current status of negotiations on the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the proposed price level.
Conner & Winters reported on its telephone conferences
with Fulbright, including a phone call in which
Conner & Winters was informed that the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee was considering asking for a higher price.
Conner & Winters also reported on the April 30,
2009 telephone conference with Hiland Partners management
regarding the
40
status of the discussion with MidFirst Bank. The Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee and its advisors then engaged in a
discussion regarding the negotiation strategy that the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee should employ with Mr. Hamm,
including the possible advantages and disadvantages to the
Hiland Partners public unitholders, weighing an attempt to
negotiate for an increase in the purchase price from
Mr. Hamm against the risk that aggressive negotiations
regarding the price might cause Mr. Hamm to decide not to
go forward with the proposed transaction. After discussions with
its advisors, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee reached
the preliminary view was that the $7.75 per common unit price
appeared to be fair to Hiland Partners and the public
unitholders. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee made a
tentative decision to request an increase in price but agreed to
consider and readdress the price issue at its next meeting. At
this meeting, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and its
advisors also generally discussed open issues with respect to
the Hiland Partners merger agreement.
On May 3, 2009, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee met
to review the outstanding issues regarding the Hiland Partners
merger agreement and finalize its strategy with respect to
price. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee discussed a
number of open issues with respect to the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and developed a position on each issue.
Conner & Winters was instructed to convey the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committees position on all of the
issues to Baker Botts. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
then returned to a discussion of the price. After discussion,
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee decided to request an
increase in the price from $7.75 per unit to $8.00 per unit to
test whether the $7.75 per common unit was the best offer that
the Committee could obtain from Mr. Hamm.
Jefferies & Company was instructed to convey that
request to Wachovia Securities.
On May 4, 2009, on behalf of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee, a representative of Fulbright contacted
Conner & Winters to ascertain the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committees position regarding the April 20
Revised Proposal and whether the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee intended to approach Mr. Hamm to ask for a price
increase. Conner & Winters replied that the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee intended to ask Mr. Hamm to
increase his bid for the Hiland Partners common units by $0.25
per common unit. Fulbright, in turn, confirmed to
Conner & Winters that the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee was considering asking for a price increase without
specifying the amount. On that same day, Conner &
Winters submitted updated proposed drafts of the Hiland Partners
merger agreement and related documentation to Baker Botts.
On May 4, 2009, a representative of Jefferies &
Company contacted Wachovia Securities to request an increase in
the offer price to $8.00 per unit. Wachovia Securities relayed
the request to Mr. Hamm and subsequently on May 5,
2009 replied to Jefferies & Company that Mr. Hamm
would not agree to increase the offer price.
On May 5, 2009, Baker Botts distributed revised drafts of
the Hiland Partners merger agreement, the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and related documents to the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee, Jefferies & Company and Conner &
Winters. On May 12, 2009, Conner & Winters and
Baker Botts had a telephone conference during which they further
negotiated the terms of the Hiland Partners merger agreement.
At a meeting of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee later on
May 12, 2009, Mr. McNabb reported that Mr. Hamm
had rejected the requested increase in price. He also reported
on his conversation with the chairman of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee and on the differences in strategic
negotiation approaches of the respective Conflicts Committees
with respect to the proposed merger agreements.
Conner & Winters then reported on their numerous
discussions with counsel to the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee on the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees
approach to the issues in the Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement
and the response that the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
had received from Mr. Hamm. A discussion was then held
regarding the response by Mr. Hamm to the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committees proposed changes in the Hiland
Partners merger agreement.
On May 13, 2009, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
met again. Conner & Winters summarized the current
state of the negotiations with Mr. Hamm and the remaining
open issues with respect to the Hiland Partners merger
agreement. A discussion ensued in which the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee concluded it was very unlikely that the
Hiland Companies could continue without some capital infusion or
renegotiation
41
of the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement since, based on
managements projections, the Hiland Companies would likely
be in violation of certain of the financial covenants in the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement as early as June 30,
2009. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee also concluded
that, based upon the experience of the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee and its advisors, as well as information provided by
Hiland Partners management, seeking covenant waivers and
amendments of credit facilities or any renegotiation of the
existing Hiland Operating Credit Agreement would likely require
the Hiland Companies to pay a significant up-front fee, involve
a significant increase in the effective interest rate and
require the reduction of growth capital expenditures and the
indefinite suspension of quarterly distributions to unitholders.
The meeting then turned to the subject of consideration of
alternatives to the proposed merger transaction and, after
discussion of each such alternative with its advisors, the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee concluded as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing the Partnership to Other
Companies. The Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee did not believe this to be a viable alternative
because (a) although the Hiland Companies had not been
proactively shopped, the proposed transaction had been known to
the public for several months, and no third party had expressed
an interest in buying either Hiland Partners or the general
partner of Hiland Partners; and (b) it would be
impracticable to sell the general partner of Hiland Partners or
Hiland Partners without Mr. Hamms approval and
Mr. Hamm (who together with Continental Gas and the Hamm
family trusts owns a 60.8% limited partner interest in Hiland
Holdings, which owns a controlling interest in Hiland Partners)
had publicly expressed interest only in acquiring common units
of the Hiland Companies and lack of interest in selling, or
causing his affiliates to sell, interests in the Hiland
Companies. In addition, given the current economic climate, the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee noted that there would be
limited access to acquisition capital available to third parties
who might be interested in purchasing the Hiland Companies.
|
|
|
|
Raise Capital in the Capital Markets. Based on
discussions with its advisors, the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee did not believe that Hiland Partners could raise a
sufficient amount of capital in the current market, especially
in light of the substantial drop in commodity prices,
particularly natural gas, and the number of drilling rigs
operating in Hiland Partners service areas, Hiland
Partners inability to pay distributions or make capital
expenditures, and the perception of the gas gathering and
processing industry among research analysts. The Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee believed it was very unlikely that the
Hiland Companies would be able to obtain debt financing from
alternative credit sources, such as traditional bank or
mezzanine lenders or high-yield bond markets, to replace their
arrangements under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, or
that the Hiland Companies could raise sufficient capital through
a sale of equity to the public or to private investors to reduce
their debt to levels that would allow them to be in compliance
with the leverage ratio covenant under the Hiland Operating
Credit Agreement, especially since distributions to the holders
of Hiland Partners common units had been suspended indefinitely.
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee estimated that the
capital required to prevent a violation of the leverage ratio
covenant under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement was more
than the then-current market capitalization of Hiland Partners.
|
|
|
|
Status Quo. Hiland Partners doing nothing and
continuing to do business as currently conducted was not a
practical option. The result of such an approach would most
likely be (a) a violation of the leverage ratio covenant
under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, (b) problems
with the Hiland Companies bank group, (c) no
distributions paid to unitholders of Hiland Partners,
(d) reduced capital expenditures with respect to the
business of the Hiland Companies, (e) deterioration of the
Hiland Companies from an operational standpoint, and
(f) further deterioration of the unit price of Hiland
Partners.
|
|
|
|
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. The Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee believed that a Chapter 11
bankruptcy proceeding would be expensive, time consuming and
very unlikely to result in any value for the unitholders of
Hiland Partners.
|
After a discussion of the above alternatives and other relevant
considerations, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
concluded that the best (and probably only viable) alternative
available to Hiland Partners
42
was the Hiland Partners merger as contemplated in the April 20
Revised Proposal. The Jefferies & Company
representatives indicated that they expected that they would be
able to render a fairness opinion when requested by the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee.
On May 15, 2009, Baker Botts distributed revised drafts of
the Hiland Partners merger agreement, the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and related documents to the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee, Jefferies & Company and Conner &
Winters. Through May 17, 2009, the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee and Conner & Winters continued to
negotiate the final remaining open issues pertaining to the
Hiland Partners merger agreement with Mr. Hamm and Baker
Botts until such time as the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
and Conner & Winters were satisfied on all substantive
issues. From May 17, 2009 through May 26, 2009, the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and Fulbright continued to
negotiate certain open issues pertaining to the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement with Mr. Hamm and Baker Botts and, during
such time, Baker Botts would periodically update
Conner & Winters on the status of negotiations with
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and propose further
revisions to the Hiland Partners merger agreement to conform the
two merger agreements. All such changes were approved by the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and Conner &
Winters.
On May 28, 2009, management delivered updated 2009
projections to Jefferies & Company, which projections
reflected updated 2009 forward strip pricing and lower expected
natural gas volumes for 2009 than contained in managements
earlier projections as a result of a continued reduction in the
level of drilling activity in Hiland Partners areas of
operation.
On June 1, 2009, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
met again with its advisors. Messrs. Griffin, Harrison and
Gipson were also present at the meeting by invitation.
Messrs. Griffin, Harrison and Gipson updated the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee and its advisors on the current
business and financial status of the Hiland Companies and
responded to various questions from the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee and its advisors. At that point in the
meeting, Messrs. Griffin, Harrison and Gipson were excused
from the meeting. Conner & Winters advised the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee that the terms of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and related documents had not changed
in a material way since the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
was last updated on May 29, 2009. Jefferies &
Company made a presentation to the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee on its financial analysis regarding the proposed
transaction, a copy of which had been provided to the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee prior to the meeting.
Jefferies & Company representatives responded to
numerous questions from the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
and counsel. At the conclusion of their presentation,
Jefferies & Company issued its oral opinion that the
transaction was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
Hiland Partners public unitholders. After hearing from its
advisors and following a subsequent discussion, the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee resolved unanimously (a) that
the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger are advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of,
Hiland Partners and the Hiland Partners public unitholders;
(b) to approve and recommend that the Hiland Partners Board
of Directors approve, on behalf of Hiland Partners (i) the
Hiland Partners merger and (ii) the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and related documents; (c) to recommend to the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors that it should recommend that
the Hiland Partners public unitholders should approve the Hiland
Partners merger and the Hiland Partners merger agreement; and
(d) to recommend to the Hiland Partners public unitholders
that such public unitholders should approve the Hiland Partners
merger and the Hiland Partners merger agreement.
The
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees Process and
Negotiations and Deliberations related to Hiland
Holdings
On February 4, 2009, after receiving the initial
authorization from the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors to
respond to the January 15 Proposal described above, the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee met to consider the retention of
legal and financial advisors and interviewed potential
candidates to serve as such. After deliberation, the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee selected Fulbright to serve as
legal counsel to the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Morris
Nichols) to serve as special Delaware counsel to the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, in light of both
firms experience in the Hiland Companies industry
and in representation of special committees and conflicts
committees.
43
Following the retention of Fulbright and Morris Nichols, the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee interviewed four potential
financial advisors.
On February 6, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee held a meeting, at which representatives from
Fulbright and Morris Nichols were present. At the meeting, the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee continued its discussions
regarding the candidates to serve as financial advisor to the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and their qualifications,
experience, independence and fee proposals. In particular, the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee discussed the independence
of Barclays Capital, including Barclays Capitals November
2008 meetings with Mr. Hamm and the management team in
which Barclays Capital analyzed potential strategic alternatives
available to the Hiland Companies, including going private
transactions led by Mr. Hamm. Following the discussion, the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee determined to contact
representatives of both Barclays Capital and one of the other
three firms for further information regarding their firms and
fees.
On the evening of February 6, 2009, Baker Botts distributed
initial drafts of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and related documents to
Fulbright, which forwarded them to the members of the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee. While the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee and its legal advisors preliminarily
reviewed and discussed the provisions of the draft Hiland
Holdings merger agreement, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee decided not to engage in negotiations of the merger
agreement provisions until it had retained a financial advisor
and the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees advisors had
a chance to engage in diligence meetings with management of the
Hiland Companies, which meetings were scheduled to take place in
Enid, Oklahoma, on February 13, 2009.
On February 11, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee held a meeting, at which representatives from
Fulbright and Morris Nichols were present, to further consider
the retention of a financial advisor. After deliberation and
determining that Barclays Capital had no current or prior
relationships that compromised its independence, the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee determined that Barclays Capital
should be engaged as the financial advisor to the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee (subject to the negotiation of the
terms of an engagement letter) based on Barclays Capitals
expertise and extensive experience advising companies in the
Hiland Companies industry and in advising special and
conflicts committees in transactions similar to the one proposed
by Mr. Hamm. Over the next several days, Fulbright and the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee engaged in negotiations with
representatives of Barclays Capital regarding the terms of
Barclays Capitals engagement.
On February 12, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee and representatives of Fulbright and Morris Nichols
met telephonically to discuss the scope of the duties that had
been delegated to the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee by the
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors.
On February 13, 2009, members of the management team of the
Hiland Companies, including Messrs. Griffin, Harrison and
Gipson, met with representatives of Barclays Capital and
Fulbright, as well as with the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee and its legal and financial advisors, in Enid,
Oklahoma, to provide a presentation of the current status of the
Hiland Companies, including financial and operating forecasts,
managements assessment of the Hiland Companies
credit arrangements and managements anticipation that
Hiland Partners would violate the leverage ratio covenant in the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement as early as June 30,
2009. Additionally, the management team reviewed the
alternatives to the January 15 Proposal explored by the
management team, including maintaining the status quo,
renegotiating or replacing the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement, selling Hiland Partners assets or issuing debt
or equity securities. Immediately following that meeting, the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee met telephonically with its
advisors to receive a report of the meeting.
On February 17, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee and its legal advisors concluded negotiations with
representatives of Barclays Capital regarding the terms of
Barclays Capitals engagement, and the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee and Barclays Capital executed Barclays
Capitals engagement letter.
44
On February 18, 2009, at a meeting of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee, with representatives from Fulbright in
attendance and representatives of Barclays Capital joining
telephonically, Messrs. Griffin and Harrison reviewed with
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee the management
teams assessment of alternatives to the January 15
Proposal as set forth in the management teams presentation
made on February 13, 2009. Messrs. Griffin and
Harrison also repeated their position, previously stated in the
February 13, 2009 meeting, that the continued decline in
the price of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs in 2009 had further
increased the risk that Hiland Partners would violate the
leverage ratio covenant under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement as early as June 30, 2009. Following the
discussion, in response to a query from the members of the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, Messrs. Griffin and
Harrison indicated that neither Hiland Holdings nor Hiland
Partners had received any offers or inquiries from any third
parties regarding an alternative to the January 15 Proposal.
Later that day, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee met
telephonically with representatives from Fulbright and Barclays
Capital to discuss Barclays Capitals proposed timing and
process for completing its diligence review and financial
analysis of the Hiland Companies and the January 15 Proposal. At
that meeting, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee also
instructed Barclays Capital that its analysis should include an
exploration of alternatives to the January 15 Proposal,
including the alternatives discussed by the management team and
any other alternatives that Barclays Capital determined the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee should consider.
Over the next several weeks, representatives of Barclays Capital
engaged in a diligence review of the Hiland Companies, including
requests for documents and data and discussions with members of
the management team regarding the management teams
financial model and the projections underlying that financial
model. In addition, Fulbright and members of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee engaged in a series of telephone calls
regarding Fulbrights initial impressions of the draft
merger agreement proposed by Mr. Hamm. During this period,
Fulbright periodically contacted representatives of
Conner & Winters to discuss their respective
impressions of the draft merger agreements.
The depressed commodity price environment that began in the
fourth quarter of 2008 continued into the first quarter of 2009.
During the third week of February, the NYMEX crude oil contract
for March 2009 settled at $38.94 per barrel. In addition, for
the first quarter of 2009, the NYMEX crude oil last day settle
averaged $37.18 per barrel. Natural gas prices continued to
decline with the NYMEX natural gas contract for March 20009
settling at $4.06 per MMBtu during the third week of February,
which was 34% lower than the January 2009 NYMEX natural gas
settle price of $6.14 per MMBtu.
On February 26, 2009, the first of several lawsuits
challenging the January 15 Proposal and related matters was
filed. For more information regarding these lawsuits, please see
Special Factors Certain Legal Matters.
On March 2, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
held a meeting, with representatives from Fulbright, Morris
Nichols and Barclays Capital in attendance, to hear Barclays
Capitals preliminary analyses, from a financial point of
view, of the Hiland Companies and the January 15 Proposal. At
this meeting, Barclays Capital reviewed with the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee preliminary materials relating to its
valuation of the Hiland Companies, including an analysis of the
depressed state of the current and projected crude oil, natural
gas and NGL commodities markets, as well as the recent financial
performance of midstream energy companies. Barclays
Capitals preliminary analyses indicated that the January
15 Proposal price of $3.20 per Hiland Holdings common unit
exceeded or was within the range of the values of the Hiland
Holdings common units implied by a valuation of Hiland Holdings
on either a discounted cash flow basis, a valuation derived from
publicly available trading or sale values of comparable
companies, or an analysis of the net asset value of the Hiland
Companies. Barclays Capitals preliminary analyses also
included analyses, from a financial point of view, of potential
strategic alternatives to the January 15 Proposal including
alternatives
45
involving the issuance of debt or equity (or both) by the Hiland
Companies. Barclays Capital noted in particular that:
|
|
|
|
|
it was very unlikely that the Hiland Companies could continue as
a going concern without some infusion of capital or
renegotiation of the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement in light
of managements projections;
|
|
|
|
it was very unlikely that the Hiland Companies could renegotiate
or replace the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement on terms that
were equal or superior to Hiland Holdings public unitholders
than the January 15 Proposal;
|
|
|
|
that it was very unlikely that the Hiland Companies could raise
sufficient equity capital at a reasonable cost to remedy their
credit situation; and
|
|
|
|
that a sale of the Hiland Companies or their assets would be
difficult considering the current state of the commodity and
acquisition markets as well as the lack of any indications of
interest from third parties since the January 15 Proposal and
Mr. Hamms statement that he was interested only in
acquiring common units in the Hiland Companies and that he was
not interested in selling (or causing his affiliates to sell)
interests in the Hiland Companies.
|
Following Barclays Capitals presentation, the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee asked Barclays Capital to provide
clarification on several of the alternatives, including an
analysis of a potential structured equity investment in the
Hiland Companies by Mr. Hamm or his affiliates. The Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee also directed Barclays Capital to
perform further diligence investigations and analysis of the
volume forecasts by the management team.
On March 3, 2009, Wachovia Securities met with
Mr. Hamm to review market developments since the January 15
Proposal and present updated analyses. Separately, Wachovia
Securities met with the management team to discuss certain of
its analyses which were based on the Hiland Companies most
recent financial projections and commodity price information.
On March 4, 2009, the members of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee met by telephone, along with representatives
of Fulbright and Morris Nichols, to review Barclays
Capitals March 2, 2009 presentation and to discuss
other specific analyses and investigations that the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee wanted Barclays Capital to conduct
on behalf of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee. The Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee also determined to seek the
assistance of the management team in arranging a direct meeting
between Dr. Lyle, on behalf of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee, and a member of the lending group under the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, to investigate the
possibility of renegotiating the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement and to confirm the potential terms and conditions that
might be expected in connection with such a renegotiation.
On March 5, 2009, during a joint meeting of the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors and the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors, Mr. McNabb informed both Boards of Directors
that members of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee had met
with MidFirst Bank earlier that day to determine what
arrangements could be reached with the lending group that would
be a viable alternative to the January 15 Proposal.
Mr. McNabb informed both Boards of Directors that MidFirst
Bank was willing to discuss the renegotiation of the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement, but that it was not encouraging
about the possibility of renegotiating or restructuring the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement on terms that would present a
viable alternative to the January 15 Proposal.
On March 6, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
met by telephone with its advisors to discuss its advisors
reaction to the report of Mr. McNabb regarding the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committees discussions with MidFirst
Bank. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee determined that
Dr. Lyle or Barclays Capital should meet with Wells Fargo,
another prominent member of the lending group under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement, to determine if other members of the
lending group might be more receptive than MidFirst Bank to
restructuring the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement on
acceptable terms.
46
On March 6, 2009, Wachovia Securities met with
Messrs. Hamm and Mackie to discuss further alternatives to
going private transactions. Among the alternatives discussed was
a rights offering in which a right to subscribe for additional
Hiland Partners common units at a discount to the public trading
price would be distributed to each Hiland Partners unitholder.
Such rights would offer current unitholders the opportunity to
participate in an equity infusion in Hiland Partners. In
addition, Wachovia discussed the possible merger of Hiland
Holdings with and into Hiland Partners to be followed by a
rights offering. During the meeting, Mr. Hamm requested
further information about a rights offering and he,
Mr. Mackie and Wachovia Securities contacted Baker Botts to
request a preliminary analysis of potential legal implications
of a rights offering.
On March 10, 2009, Messrs. Hamm and Reid met with
Messrs. Griffin and Harrison and requested that they
continue to pursue alternatives available to the Hiland
Companies with respect to the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
On March 14, 2009, Messrs. Hamm and Reid met
telephonically with Wachovia Securities to compare the proposed
going private transactions with both a stand-alone rights
offering and a merger of Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners in
conjunction with a rights offering. Wachovia Securities also
presented a case study for a recent amended credit agreement of
a midstream MLP and discussed the possibility of negotiating
with the lenders under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee met with its financial
advisors on March 13, 2009 to receive an update to Barclays
Capitals preliminary analysis based upon any changes in
market conditions since its initial report on March 2, 2009
and to discuss the results of its continued analysis of the
January 15 Proposal and any strategic alternatives to that
proposal. Representatives of Barclays Capital indicated its
preliminary view that as of the date thereof the $3.20 per
common unit cash consideration being offered by Mr. Hamm
appeared to be within or above the range of values of the Hiland
Holdings common units implied by a valuation of Hiland Holdings.
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee also asked Barclays
Capital to follow up with Wachovia Securities regarding the
possibility of a structured equity investment by Mr. Hamm
as an alternative to the January 15 Proposal.
Messrs. Hamm and Reid met telephonically with Wachovia
Securities on March 16, 2009 and again on March 17,
2009 to compare the proposed going private transactions with a
subordinated debt issuance funded by Mr. Hamm and his
affiliates. Later on March 17, 2009, Messrs. Hamm and
Harrison met with representatives of MidFirst Bank to discuss
the possibility of renegotiating the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement in the context of both the proposed going private
transactions and a subordinated debt issuance.
On March 17, 2009, Dr. Lyle held a telephonic meeting
with representatives of Wells Fargo in which Wells Fargo
confirmed that it might be willing to discuss a renegotiation of
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, but that any such
renegotiation or waiver would require a significant upfront
restructuring fee, a significant increase in the applicable
interest rate and other modifications demanded by the lenders to
the loan agreement, including a significant reduction or
elimination of distributions.
On March 18, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
had a telephone call with its advisors during which Barclays
Capital confirmed its preliminary view that as of the date
thereof the January 15 Proposal offered consideration of $3.20
per common unit of Hiland Holdings was within or above the range
of fairness, from a financial point of view, to the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee and Barclays Capital also noted that decreases in
distributions by Hiland Partners had a more significant impact
on the market price and value of Hiland Holdings common units
since Hiland Holdings only source of cash flow was
distributions from Hiland Partners.
From March 20, 2009 through March 24, 2009, the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee held several telephone calls with
its advisors, including Barclays Capital, Fulbright, and Morris
Nichols, to discuss possible negotiating strategies with
Mr. Hamm regarding the January 15 Proposal. The Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee determined that Barclays Capital
should contact representatives of Wachovia Securities and
indicate that the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee might be
able to support the currently proposed price of $3.20 per common
unit, but that there were significant issues to discuss with
respect to the terms of the
47
draft Hiland Holdings merger agreement. The Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee then instructed Fulbright to distribute a
revised version of the draft Hiland Holdings merger agreement to
Wachovia Securities and Baker Botts reflecting the comments and
proposed changes of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and
its advisors.
On March 24, 2009, Fulbright transmitted comments to the
draft merger agreement to Baker Botts, and a representative of
Barclays Capital called a representative of Wachovia Securities
to inform them of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees
position. The representative of Wachovia Securities indicated to
Barclays Capital that, while Mr. Hamms offer with
respect to the proposed transaction was still outstanding,
Mr. Hamm was not ready to enter into direct negotiations at
that time because they were in ongoing discussions with MidFirst
Bank regarding the continued financing of the Hiland Companies
following the consummation of the transactions proposed in the
January 15 Proposal and that they were considering other
alternatives for the Hiland Companies, including a capital
infusion into the Hiland Companies by Mr. Hamm.
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee reconvened by telephone
later that same day to receive a report from Barclays Capital
regarding its discussions with Wachovia Securities. A
representative of Barclays Capital summarized for the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee its call earlier that day with
Wachovia Securities and indicated to the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee that Barclays Capital believed the proposed
transaction continued to be a superior option for the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders, when compared with the alternative
of an equity infusion by Mr. Hamm, because such an equity
infusion would likely include significant dilution of Hiland
Holdings interest in Hiland Partners, a significant
reduction or elimination in distributions by Hiland Partners
(and, consequently, a reduction in value of the subordinated
units and incentive distribution rights in Hiland Partners owned
by Hiland Holdings as arrearages built up with regard to minimum
quarterly distributions on the Hiland Partners common units).
From March 24, 2009, until April 20, 2009, there were
no active negotiations between the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee and its representatives and Mr. Hamm and his
representatives related to the January 15 Proposal, though
representatives of Fulbright and Conner & Winters
periodically discussed their respective impressions of the draft
merger agreements.
On April 1, 2009, management delivered updated 2009
projections to Barclays Capital, which projections reflected
updated 2009 forward strip pricing and lower expected natural
gas volumes for 2009 than contained in managements earlier
projections as a result of a continued reduction in the level of
drilling activity in Hiland Partners areas of operation.
At this time, Hiland Partners was experiencing the effects of
the reduction in drilling activity seen throughout the United
States during this time period. For example, U.S. natural
gas drilling rig counts declined by approximately 29% to 1,018
as of February 20, 2009, compared to 1,430 natural gas
drilling rigs in the comparable period of 2008, and
approximately 37% compared to the peak natural gas drilling rig
count of 1,606 in August and September 2008. Due to the
substantial reduction in drilling activity, Hiland Partners
connected 10 new wells during the first quarter of 2009 as
compared to 24 wells during the fourth quarter of 2008,
representing a 58% decline.
On April 7, 2009, MidFirst Bank formally notified the
lenders under Hilands Operating Credit Agreement of
requested modifications to such credit agreement to increase the
leverage ratio under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement to
(i) 5.25 to 1.0 through June 30, 2010, (ii) 5.0
to 1.0 for the period from July 1, 2010 through
December 31, 2010, and (iii) 4.75 to 1.0 for the
period from January 1, 2011 to maturity. The modifications
would require Mr. Hamm to inject $50 million of equity
into Hiland Partners in conjunction with the consummation of the
going private transactions and would prohibit distributions
unless the leverage ratio was less than 4.25 to 1.0. The
modification would also require an amendment fee and increased
interest rates and was subject to formal documentation.
On April 16, 2009, Wachovia Securities met telephonically
with Messrs. Hamm, Reid and Mackie to review its financial
analysis of going private transactions in light of developments
in the market and the Hiland Companies financial outlook
since the January 15 Proposal. Messrs. Griffin, Harrison
and Gipson were invited to listen to the Wachovia
Securities presentation and to provide an update on
managements negotiations with the lenders under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement.
48
On April 17, 2009, MidFirst Bank informed the management
team that it had received non-binding indications of interests
to the proposed modifications to the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement contained in the April 7, 2009 notice from the
required lenders (more than 50% of commitments). Subsequently,
MidFirst Bank informed management it had received non-binding
indications of interests to the proposed modifications to the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement from all lenders.
On April 20, 2009, Dr. Lyle received a telephone call
from Mr. Hamm, during which Mr. Hamm stated that he
and his representatives had engaged in lengthy discussions with
MidFirst Bank regarding the terms on which the Hiland
Companies lenders would agree to amend the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement in connection with the closing of the
acquisition of the Hiland Companies by Mr. Hamm and his
affiliates, as well as the adverse effect that continued
declines in commodity prices, particularly natural gas prices,
and drilling activity along Hiland Partners systems had on
the Hiland Companies current financial performance and
long-term prospects. In the call, Mr. Hamm stated that
Mr. Hamm would no longer continue with the prior proposed
offer of $3.20 per Hiland Holdings common unit, based upon the
terms under which the lenders were willing to amend the existing
credit arrangements and the worsening outlook for the Hiland
Companies. Dr. Lyle then asked Mr. Hamm if
Mr. Hamm, his affiliates or the Hamm family trusts had
considered making a direct equity investment into the Hiland
Companies as an alternative to the proposed transaction.
Mr. Hamm replied that he had considered such an investment
as an alternative, but had concluded that his proposed going
private transactions were a superior alternative, in part
because he believed a direct equity investment would be overly
dilutive to the common unitholders.
Later that same day, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee each received a letter
from Harold Hamm amending the January 15 Proposal and describing
the terms of the April 20 Revised Proposal summarized above in
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees
Process, Negotiations and Deliberations. Under the revised
terms proposed by Mr. Hamm, holders of Hiland Holdings
common units would receive $2.40 in cash per common unit,
reduced from $3.20 in cash per common unit under the January 15
Proposal. In his letter reducing the offered consideration,
Mr. Hamm cited the adverse effect that continued declines
in natural gas prices and drilling activity along Hiland
Partners systems had had on the Hiland Companies
current and long-term projected throughput volumes, midstream
segment margins and cash flows since the January 15 Proposal.
On April 24, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
and the Hiland Partners Board of Directors both unanimously
voted to suspend quarterly distributions with respect to each
entitys partnership units beginning with the first quarter
distribution of 2009, based on each of the Hiland Companies
Board of Directors consideration of the impact of lower
commodity prices and drilling activity on Hiland Partners
current and projected throughput volumes, midstream segment
margins and cash flows, as well as future required levels of
capital expenditures and the level of Hiland Partners
outstanding indebtedness under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement.
On April 27, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
held a telephone call with representatives of Fulbright and
Barclays Capital to discuss the April 20 call with Mr. Hamm
and the April 20 Revised Proposal. During the call, the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee instructed Barclays Capital to
evaluate the April 20 Revised Proposal and report back to the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee as soon as possible.
Later that same evening, Baker Botts transmitted a revised draft
of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement to Fulbright.
On April 28, 2009, representatives of Barclays Capital held
a telephonic discussion with representatives of Wachovia
Securities during which the financial advisors reviewed the
status of discussions between the Hiland Companies and MidFirst
Bank regarding the potential covenant violation under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement.
On the morning of April 30, 2009, the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee held a telephonic meeting with its advisors,
including Fulbright and Barclays Capital. Representatives of
Barclays Capital recounted the call it had with Wachovia
Securities regarding the operational update and status regarding
MidFirst Bank and Hiland Partners potential violation of
the leverage ratio covenant under the Hiland Operating Credit
49
Agreement. Fulbright also briefed the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee on the revised draft of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and indicated that while some progress had been made
on the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, there were still issues
to resolve, including the extent of the representations,
warranties and covenants and whether the potential covenant
violation under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement following
signing could be the basis for Mr. Hamm and his affiliates
to refuse to close the Hiland Holdings merger. The Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee decided to finalize its strategy on
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement following Barclays
Capitals completion of its updated financial analysis of
the April 20 Revised Proposal.
Later that morning, Fulbright, Barclays Capital and
Conner & Winters participated in a call with
Messrs. Griffin and Harrison and Vinson & Elkins
regarding the status of Hiland Partners discussions with
MidFirst Bank and the potential violation of the leverage ratio
covenant under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
Mr. Harrison reported that MidFirst Bank was still willing
to discuss an amendment or waiver, but as it had previously
informed Mr. Harrison, such an amendment would involve high
up-front fees, a significant increase in the interest rate and
the indefinite suspension of distributions by Hiland Partners.
Additionally, Mr. Harrison reported that, while MidFirst
Bank had indicated that it might grant a temporary waiver for
the potential violation of the leverage ratio covenant if the
proposed transaction did not close prior to the default, it
would not agree to do so in advance.
On May 1, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
conducted a telephone call with its advisors, including
Fulbright, Morris Nichols and Barclays Capital. During the call,
Barclays Capital provided its preliminary analysis that as of
the date thereof and in light of subsequent developments, the
April 20 Revised Proposal cash consideration of $2.40 per Hiland
Holdings common unit was within or above the range of values of
the Hiland Holdings common units implied by a valuation of
Hiland Holdings, and therefore appeared to be fair to the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders from a financial point of view. In
addition, Barclays Capital reported that it had received a
description of the terms on which the lenders would amend the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement following a closing of the
proposed Hiland Holdings merger, and that, as anticipated,
Mr. Hamm would be required to contribute a substantial
amount of equity to Hiland Partners to pay down indebtedness
under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. Barclays Capital
also preliminarily reaffirmed its prior view that, based on
Barclays Capitals experience and expertise in the current
credit markets, if the Hiland Companies were to reject the April
20 Revised Proposal and attempt to refinance or replace the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, the terms of that refinancing
or replacement would likely be worse financially for the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders than the April 20 Revised Proposal,
especially considering that any refinancing of the existing
indebtedness would likely involve the continued suspension of
distributions by Hiland Partners for a considerable period of
time.
On May 4, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
held a telephone conference with Fulbright and Barclays Capital,
in which a representative of Fulbright reported that he had
spoken to Conner & Winters and confirmed that the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee intended to seek an increase
in the offer price of $0.25 per common unit. After a brief
discussion, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee determined
that it would seek a price increase from Mr. Hamm to test
whether the April 20 Revised Proposal was the best offer that
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee could obtain from
Mr. Hamm. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
instructed Barclays Capital to contact Wachovia Securities to
pass along the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees
request that the price per common unit offered by Mr. Hamm
be increased by a meaningful amount. After
discussions with Messrs. Griffin and Harrison, Wachovia
Securities responded later that day at the direction of
Mr. Griffin and requested that the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee propose a specific increase.
On May 5, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee met
again with Barclays Capital and Fulbright by telephone to
discuss the specific amount of the price increase it should
request from Mr. Hamm. After deliberating and obtaining the
preliminary financial views of Barclays Capital, the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee determined that Barclays Capital
should contact Wachovia Securities and request that the offer
proposed by the Hamm Continuing Investors be increased by
$0.40 per common unit. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
also discussed with Fulbright issues raised by the Hamm
Continuing Investors and Baker Botts in the April 27 draft of
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement. Specifically, the Hiland
Holdings
50
Conflicts Committee felt that Fulbright should attempt to limit
operational representations and warranties and interim operating
covenants of Hiland Holdings in the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, which would limit the ability of Mr. Hamm and
his affiliates to terminate or avoid closing the proposed going
private transaction.
Later that day, representatives of Barclays Capital contacted
Wachovia Securities to request, on behalf of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee, that the offer proposed by Mr. Hamm be
increased by $0.40 per Hiland Holdings common unit. Wachovia
Securities relayed the request to Mr. Hamm, and at his
direction contacted Barclays Capital again that afternoon to
report that Mr. Hamm would not agree to increase the offer
price of $2.40 per Hiland Holdings common unit in the April 20
Revised Proposal.
Barclays Capital relayed Mr. Hamms refusal to the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee in a telephone conference
the next morning, May 6, 2009, at which representatives of
Fulbright were present. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
members then indicated that they thought that they should
personally appeal to Mr. Hamm to increase his offer price
so that they could confirm whether the offer price of $2.40 per
common unit was the best price that they could obtain from
Mr. Hamm.
Later that day, following the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
meeting in Enid, Oklahoma, both members of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee met directly with Mr. Hamm to again
request that he increase the offered price of $2.40 per Hiland
Holdings common unit by $0.40 per common unit. Mr. Hamm
agreed to evaluate the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committees request, but on May 8, 2009, at the
direction of Mr. Hamm, Wachovia Securities contacted
Barclays Capital to report that Mr. Hamm had again rejected
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees request to
increase the offer price. Barclays Capital reported this to the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee in a telephone conference
later that day. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
determined that it would likely not be productive to seek
further price increases from Mr. Hamm, and that Barclays
Capital should work to confirm that it could opine as to the
fairness to Hiland Holdings public unitholders, from a financial
point of view, of the $2.40 per Hiland Holdings common unit
offered in the April 20 Revised Proposal. Additionally, the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee directed Fulbright to
continue negotiations with Baker Botts regarding the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and related documents, and that
Fulbright should make efforts to coordinate with
Conner & Winters in its negotiations regarding the
Hiland Partners merger agreement with Baker Botts and
Mr. Hamm.
Between May 8, 2009 and May 26, 2009, representatives
of Fulbright, on behalf of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee, continued to negotiate the terms of the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement with representatives of Baker Botts in
accordance with the instructions of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee. Fulbright coordinated directly with
Conner & Winters in its negotiations with Baker Botts,
periodically discussing the various provisions of the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement with Conner & Winters and
reviewing and receiving information from Conner &
Winters about the status of the Hiland Partners draft
merger agreement. During this period, Fulbright and Baker Botts
participated in several calls and meetings regarding the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and related documents. In particular,
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, in consultation with
Fulbright, determined that Fulbright should continue to seek to
limit operational representations, warranties and interim
operating covenants of Hiland Holdings, as well as to limit the
circumstances where Mr. Hamm and his affiliates could
terminate the Hiland Holdings merger agreement or refuse to
close the Hiland Holdings merger following execution of the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement.
On May 27, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
met with Barclays Capital and Fulbright to discuss the status of
negotiations on the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and to
receive an updated, preliminary presentation from Barclays
Capital regarding its analysis of the April 20 Revised Proposal,
from a financial point of view. At the meeting, representatives
of Fulbright reviewed with the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee its obligations and duties under the Hiland Holdings
partnership agreement and applicable law. Fulbright also
provided the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee with a review
of the terms of the Hiland Holdings draft merger agreement and
related documents. Following Fulbrights presentation, a
representative of Barclays Capital presented the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee an update of recent trends in the equity
markets and commodity prices and a review of its financial
analysis of the April 20 Revised Proposal. In particular,
Barclays Capital confirmed its preliminary view that as of the
date thereof, the cash merger consideration of $2.40 per common
unit of Hiland Holdings was fair, from a financial point of
51
view, to the Hiland Holdings public unitholders. Barclays
Capital also stated in its presentation that, for the same
reasons it had indicated in its March 2, 2009 presentation
to the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, it did not appear
likely that there were alternatives to the April 20 Revised
Proposal that were superior, from a financial point of view, to
the Hiland Holdings public unitholders.
On May 28, 2009, management delivered updated 2009
projections to Barclays Capital, which projections reflected
updated 2009 forward strip pricing and lower expected natural
gas volumes for 2009 than contained in managements earlier
projections as a result of a continued reduction in the level of
drilling activity in Hiland Partners areas of operation.
On June 1, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
met again with its advisors. At the meeting, Fulbright confirmed
that the terms of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and
related documents had not materially changed since the May 27
meeting of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee. Barclays
Capital also briefly updated its financial analysis from the May
27 meeting of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee (based on
updated market and company information) and delivered its
opinion that the merger consideration of $2.40 per common unit
offered to the Hiland Holdings public unitholders pursuant to
the Hiland Holdings merger was fair, from a financial point of
view, to such holders. After hearing from its advisors, the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee resolved unanimously
(a) that the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
Hiland Holdings merger are advisable, fair to, and in the best
interests of, Hiland Holdings and the Hiland Holdings public
unitholders, (b) to approve and recommend that the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors approve, on behalf of Hiland
Holdings (i) the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and
related documents, and (ii) the Hiland Holdings merger,
(c) to recommend to the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
that it should recommend that the Hiland Holdings public
unitholders should approve the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings merger, and (d) to recommend to the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders that such public unitholders
should approve the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
Hiland Holdings merger.
Approval
of the Mergers by the Boards of Directors
On June 1, 2009, following the meetings of each Conflicts
Committee during which each Conflicts Committees approved the
applicable merger agreement and merger and recommended that
their respective full Board of Directors approve the applicable
merger agreement and merger, each of the Boards of Directors of
the Hiland Companies convened a special meeting to consider the
recommendation.
At the Hiland Partners Board of Directors meeting,
Vinson & Elkins again reviewed with the Hiland
Partners Board of Directors its duties under the Hiland Partners
partnership agreement, and Messrs. Griffin and Harrison
provided an update on Hiland Partners business. Following
the update, Jefferies & Company presented its
financial analysis of the $7.75 per common unit merger
consideration and summarized its opinion, delivered earlier to
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, that the Hiland
Partners merger consideration was fair, from a financial point
of view, to the Hiland Partners public unitholders.
Conner & Winters then reviewed the terms of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the related agreements. After
hearing from its advisors and the members of the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee and their advisors, the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors approved the Hiland Partners merger agreement
and the Hiland Partners merger, recommended approval of the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger
to the Hiland Partners public unitholders and took other related
actions.
Following the conclusion of the special meeting of the Hiland
Partners Board of Directors, the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors also convened a special meeting. At this meeting,
Vinson & Elkins again reviewed with the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors its duties under the Hiland Holdings
partnership agreement, and Messrs. Griffin and Harrison
provided an update on the Hiland Companies business.
Following the update, Barclays Capital presented its financial
analysis of the $2.40 per common unit merger consideration and
summarized its opinion, delivered earlier to the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee, that the Hiland Holdings merger
consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders. Fulbright then reviewed the
terms of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the related
agreements. After hearing from its advisors and the members of
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and
52
their advisors, the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors approved
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
merger, recommended approval of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger to the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders and took other related actions.
On the afternoon of June 1, 2009, Hiland Partners, the
general partner of Hiland Partners, Parent and HLND Merger Sub
executed the Hiland Partners merger agreement and related
documents and Hiland Holdings, the general partner of Hiland
Holdings, Parent and HPGP Merger Sub executed the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the related documents. The Hiland
Companies then issued a joint press release announcing the
signing of the merger agreements.
Recommendations
of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and Hiland Partners
Board of Directors; Reasons for Recommending Approval of the
Merger
The
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee consists of two
independent directors: John T. McNabb, II, and Shelby E.
Odell. In resolutions approved by the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors on February 19, 2009, the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee was authorized to review, evaluate and make
recommendations to the Hiland Partners Board of Directors with
respect to Mr. Hamms proposed acquisition of the
publicly-held Hiland Partners common units and potential
alternative transactions. The Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee retained Jefferies & Company as its
independent financial advisor and Conner & Winters as
its independent legal counsel. The Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee oversaw the performance of financial and legal due
diligence by its advisors, conducted an extensive review and
evaluation of Mr. Hamms proposal and potential
alternative transactions and conducted negotiations with
Mr. Hamm and his representatives with respect to the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the various other agreements
related to the Hiland Partners merger.
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, by unanimous vote at a
meeting held on June 1, 2009, determined that the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by
the Hiland Partners merger agreement were advisable, fair to,
and in the best interests of, Hiland Partners and the Hiland
Partners public unitholders. In addition, at the June 1,
2009 meeting, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
recommended that (1) the Hiland Partners Board of Directors
approve the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the related
agreements, and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the Hiland Partners merger and
(2) the Hiland Partners public unitholders vote in favor of
approval of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland
Partners merger. In reaching its determination, the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee consulted with and received the
advice of its independent financial and legal advisors,
considered the potential alternatives of Hiland Partners,
including the uncertainties and risks facing it, and considered
the interests of the Hiland Partners public unitholders.
In determining that the Hiland Partners merger agreement was
advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland
Partners and the Hiland Partners public unitholders and
recommending the approval of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the related agreements, and the consummation of
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Hiland
Partners merger, to the Hiland Partners Board of Directors on
June 1, 2009, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
considered a number of factors. The material factors are
summarized below.
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee viewed the following
factors as being generally positive or favorable in coming to
its determination and recommendation:
1. The Hiland Partners merger would provide the Hiland
Partners public unitholders with cash consideration of $7.75 per
common unit, a price the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
viewed as fair in light of Hiland Partners recent and
projected financial performance and recent trading prices of the
Hiland Partners common units. In making this determination, the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee concluded that the best
alternative was the proposed Hiland Partners merger.
2. The opinion received by the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee from its financial advisor, Jefferies &
Company, delivered orally at the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee meeting on June 1, 2009, and subsequently
confirmed in writing later that day, to the effect that, as of
the date of the
53
opinion, the $7.75 per common unit merger consideration to be
received by the Hiland Partners public unitholders pursuant to
the Hiland Partners merger, was fair, from a financial point of
view, to those holders.
3. The presentation of Jefferies & Company on
June 1, 2009, in connection with the foregoing opinion,
which is described under Opinion of Financial
Advisor of Hiland Partners.
4. The difficult business environment currently facing
Hiland Partners, including commodity prices, in particular
natural gas prices, and the significant reduction in drilling
activity and the resulting negative effect on the financial
condition and results of operations of Hiland Partners.
5. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees belief
that it was unlikely that any other transaction with a third
party involving a sale of the Hiland Companies or a significant
interest in the Hiland Companies could be consummated at this
time in light of the position of Mr. Hamm (contained in his
letter, dated January 15, 2009, to the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors and subsequently confirmed to the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee) that he was interested only in
acquiring common units in the Hiland Companies and that he was
not interested in selling (or causing his affiliates to sell)
interests in the Hiland Companies and the lack of any
indications of interest from any third parties since the public
announcement of the January 15 Proposal.
6. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees belief
that the $7.75 per common unit cash merger consideration
represented the highest per common unit consideration that could
be negotiated.
7. The likelihood that Hiland Partners would be in
violation of the leverage ratio covenant under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement as soon as June 30, 2009. In
that regard, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee noted that:
|
|
|
|
|
any solution satisfactory to the existing lenders (or any
lenders willing to refinance the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement) would likely require the assessment of fees and
increased rates, the infusion of additional equity capital or
the incurrence of subordinated indebtedness by Hiland Partners,
and the indefinite suspension of distributions, including
distributions to Hiland Holdings; and
|
|
|
|
it was unlikely that the Hiland Companies could raise
significant equity capital through a sale of equity to the
public or to private investors (including to Mr. Hamm since
he had rejected such an investment).
|
8. The terms of the Hiland Partners commitment letter from
Mr. Hamm to Parent to fund the full amount of the HLND
Parent Parties obligation to pay the merger consideration,
including the provision making Hiland Partners a third-party
beneficiary under the Hiland Partners commitment letter.
9. The terms of the Hiland Partners merger agreement,
principally:
|
|
|
|
|
all of the outstanding common units not held by Hiland Holdings
(and restricted common units held by officers and employees of
Hiland Partners) will be converted into the right to receive
cash at $7.75 per common unit;
|
|
|
|
the requirement that the Hiland Partners merger agreement and
the Hiland Partners merger be approved by a vote of the holders
of a majority of the common units held by the Hiland Partners
public unitholders entitled to vote thereon voting as a class;
|
|
|
|
the provision limiting the ability of the HLND Parent Parties to
close the Hiland Holdings merger without closing the Hiland
Partners merger, unless the Hiland Partners public unitholders
fail to approve the Hiland Partners merger and Hiland Partners
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the limited nature of the operational representations and
warranties given by Hiland Partners and the fact that the
representations and warranties of Hiland Partners do not survive
the closing;
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
the inability of the HLND Parent Parties to refuse to close the
Hiland Partners merger as the result of a failure of Hiland
Operating to be in compliance with certain financial covenants
of the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of a financing condition to the HLND Parent
Parties obligation to consummate the transaction;
|
|
|
|
the provision allowing the Hiland Partners Board of Directors or
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee to withdraw or change
its recommendation of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and
the Hiland Partners merger if it makes a good faith
determination that a change or withdrawal would be in the best
interests of the Hiland Partners public unitholders, subject to
providing Parent with advance notice;
|
|
|
|
the provisions allowing for Hiland Partners to participate in
negotiations with a third party in response to an unsolicited
alternative proposal, which may, in certain circumstances,
result in a superior proposal; and
|
|
|
|
the lack of a
break-up fee
for termination of the Hiland Partners merger agreement in
accordance with its terms, although Hiland Partners may be
liable to reimburse the expenses of the HLND Parent Parties in
certain limited circumstances if the Hiland Partners merger
agreement is terminated.
|
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee considered the following
factors to be generally negative or unfavorable in making its
determination and recommendation:
1. The Hiland Partners public unitholders will have no
ongoing equity participation in Hiland Partners following the
Hiland Partners merger, and such unitholders will cease to
participate in Hiland Partners future earnings or growth,
if any, or to benefit from increases, if any, in the value of
Hiland Partners common units and would not participate in
any potential future sale of Hiland Partners to a third party.
2. Given that Mr. Hamm (who together with Continental
Gas and the Hamm family trusts own a 60.8% limited partner
interest in Hiland Holdings, which owns a controlling interest
in Hiland Partners) had publicly expressed an interest only in
acquiring common units of the Hiland Companies and lack of
interest in selling, or causing his affiliates to sell,
interests in the Hiland Companies, it would be impracticable to
sell the general partner of Hiland Partners or Hiland Partners
without his approval. Therefore, no attempt was made to contact
third parties that might otherwise consider an acquisition of
Hiland Partners. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
recognized that it was possible (although not considered to be
likely) that a sale process open to all possible bidders might
result in a higher sale price than the cash consideration
payable in the Hiland Partners merger.
3. The Hiland Partners merger agreements limitation
on Hiland Partners ability to solicit third party offers.
4. The possibility that the Hamm Continuing Investors could
sell some or all of Hiland Partners, as the surviving entity
following the Hiland Partners merger, or its assets to one or
more purchasers at a valuation higher than that available in the
Hiland Partners merger.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee is not
intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material factors
considered by the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee. In view
of the variety of factors considered in connection with its
evaluation of the Hiland Partners merger, the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee did not find it practicable to, and did not,
quantify or otherwise assign specific weights to the factors
considered in reaching its determination and recommendation. In
addition, each of the members of the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee may have given differing weights to different factors.
On balance, the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee believed
that the positive factors discussed above outweighed the
negative factors discussed above.
55
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee believes that sufficient
procedural safeguards were and are present to ensure the
fairness of the Hiland Partners merger and to permit the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee to represent effectively the
interests of the Hiland Partners public unitholders, each of
which the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee believes supports
its decision and provides assurance of the fairness of the
Hiland Partners merger to the Hiland Partners public
unitholders. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee believes
that the process it followed in making its determination and
recommendation with respect to the Hiland Partners merger
agreement was fair because:
1. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee consisted solely
of directors who are not officers or controlling unitholders of
Hiland Partners, or affiliated with Mr. Hamm or any of the
Hamm Continuing Investors.
2. The members of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
were adequately compensated for their services and their
compensation was in no way contingent on their approving the
Hiland Partners merger agreement or the Hiland Partners merger.
3. Other than by the immediate vesting of any restricted
common units issued and outstanding to non-employee directors of
Hiland Partners pursuant to the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan immediately prior to the effective time of the
Hiland Partners merger, the members of the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee will not personally benefit from the
completion of the Hiland Partners merger in a manner different
from the Hiland Partners public unitholders.
4. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee retained and was
advised by independent legal counsel, Conner &
Winters, and an independent financial advisor,
Jefferies & Company.
5. From the date that the January 15 Proposal was announced
to the time of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees
determination and recommendations, no third parties indicated
any interest in pursuing a transaction with Hiland Partners or
Hiland Holdings.
6. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and its legal
counsel and financial advisor conducted due diligence regarding
the Hiland Companies and their prospects and considered all
viable alternatives for Hiland Partners in addition to the
proposed Hiland Partners merger agreement.
7. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee received the
opinion of Jefferies & Company that, as of
June 1, 2009, and based on and subject to the factors and
assumptions set forth in the opinion, the merger consideration
to be received by the Hiland Partners public unitholders
pursuant to the Hiland Partners merger agreement was fair, from
a financial point of view, to such holders.
8. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee had the ultimate
authority to decide whether or not to proceed with the proposed
transaction or any alternatives, and the Hiland Partners Board
of Directors resolved not to recommend, authorize, approve or
endorse the January 15 Proposal or any other merger, acquisition
or similar proposal involving Hiland Partners and the Hamm
Continuing Investors or any of their affiliates unless such
transaction was recommended to the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors by the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee.
9. The requirement that the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the Hiland Partners merger be approved by holders
of a majority of the Hiland Partners common units held by Hiland
Partners public unitholders entitled to vote thereon voting as a
class.
10. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, with the
assistance of its legal and financial advisors, negotiated the
terms of the Hiland Partners merger agreement on an
arms-length basis with Mr. Hamm and his legal and
financial advisors.
11. The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee was aware that
it had no obligation to recommend any transaction, including the
proposal put forth by Mr. Hamm.
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee did not consider
liquidation value in determining the fairness of the Hiland
Partners merger to the Hiland Partners public unitholders
because of its belief, after consulting with its financial
advisor, that liquidation value does not present a meaningful
valuation for Hiland Partners and its
56
business as Hiland Partners value is derived from the cash
flows generated from its continuing operations rather than from
the value of assets that might be realized in a liquidation.
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee also did not consider
net book value in determining the fairness of the merger to the
Hiland Partners public unitholders because of its belief, after
consulting with its financial advisor, that net book value does
not present a meaningful valuation metric for Hiland Partners
and its business as Hiland Partners value is derived from
the cash flows generated from its continuing operations.
The
Hiland Partners Board of Directors
The Hiland Partners Board of Directors consists of eight
directors: Harold Hamm, Joseph L. Griffin, Matthew S. Harrison,
Edward D. Doherty, Michael L. Greenwood, John T.
McNabb, II, Shelby E. Odell, and Rayford T. Reid. When the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors received the January 15
Proposal, Dr. David L. Boren was also a member of the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors. Mr. Boren subsequently
resigned on March 13, 2009.
The directors of Hiland Partners have different interests in the
Hiland Partners merger than the Hiland Partners public
unitholders, generally. In particular:
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates of Mr. Hamm, the Chairman of the Board of
Directors of each of the Hiland Companies, are counterparties to
the Hiland Companies in each of the merger agreements and will
acquire, along with the Hamm family trusts, all of the
outstanding common units of each of the Hiland Companies not
already owned by the Hamm Continuing Investors (other than
certain restricted common units discussed below) pursuant to the
merger agreements.
|
|
|
|
six of the eight members of the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors serve as members of the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors, and therefore have certain duties and obligations to
the unitholders of each Hiland Company as provided in the
respective partnership agreements of the Hiland Companies;
|
|
|
|
the non-employee directors of Hiland Partners hold restricted
common units of Hiland Partners, which will vest immediately
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger and
automatically convert into the right to receive the Hiland
Partners merger consideration in the Hiland Partners merger;
|
|
|
|
certain employee directors of Hiland Partners own phantom units
in Hiland Partners that will remain outstanding as equity
interests in the surviving entity following the Hiland Partners
merger. Additionally, if any employee directors of Hiland
Partners are granted restricted common units, phantom units or
unit options under the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive
Plan or the Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan in
the ordinary course of business prior to the effective time of
the Hiland Partners merger or the Hiland Holdings merger, as
applicable, such equity interests will remain outstanding
following the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger or
the Hiland Holdings merger, as applicable;
|
|
|
|
certain members of the Hiland Partners Board of Directors hold
Hiland Holdings common units which will convert into the right
to receive the Hiland Holdings merger consideration in the
Hiland Holdings merger;
|
|
|
|
certain members of the Hiland Partners Board of Directors who
also serve on the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors, as well as
Mr. Odell, who was formerly a member of the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors, hold restricted common units in Hiland
Holdings, which will vest immediately prior to the effective
time of the Hiland Holdings merger and automatically convert
into the right to receive the Hiland Holdings merger
consideration in the Hiland Holdings merger;
|
|
|
|
the members of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees have
received payments in the amount of $30,000 each for their
consideration and negotiation of the mergers, which payments
were not contingent on any outcome of the consideration or
negotiations;
|
|
|
|
Joseph L. Griffin and Matthew S. Harrison, who are members of
the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of each of the Hiland
Companies, have
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
agreed to vote their common units of Hiland Partners in favor of
the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger, have been offered continued employment with the
surviving entities after the effective times of the mergers, and
may enter into or be provided new employment, retention and
compensation arrangements (although no such arrangements have
been proposed or agreed to); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
certain indemnification arrangements and insurance policies for
directors and officers of the general partner of Hiland Partners
will be continued for six years by the surviving entity in the
Hiland Partners merger if the Hiland Partners merger is
completed.
|
For a complete discussion of these and other interests of the
members of the Hiland Partners Board of Directors in the Hiland
Partners merger, see Special Factors Interests
of Certain Persons in the Mergers.
Because of such actual and potential conflicts, the Hiland
Partners Board of Directors authorized the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee to review, evaluate and make recommendations
to the Hiland Partners Board of Directors and the Hiland
Partners public unitholders regarding Mr. Hamms
proposal and any potential alternatives thereto. On June 1,
2009, the Hiland Partners Board of Directors met to consider the
report and recommendation of the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee. On the basis of the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committees recommendation and the other factors described
below, each of the six members of the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors participating in the meeting unanimously
(1) determined that the Hiland Partners merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement, including the Hiland Partners merger, were advisable,
fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland Partners and
Hiland Partners public unitholders and (2) recommended that
the Hiland Partners public unitholders vote to approve the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger.
Neither of Messrs. Hamm nor Reid participated in the Hiland
Partners Board of Directors consideration or vote on these
matters. Mr. Hamm did not feel his participation was
appropriate given that the Hiland Partners Board of Directors
was evaluating his offer to acquire Hiland Partners.
Mr. Reid did not feel participation was appropriate given
his professional relationship with Mr. Hamm, through which
he has historically provided Mr. Hamm and the Hamm family
trusts with financial advisory services, including in connection
with evaluating strategic alternatives with respect to the
Hiland Companies.
Because Messrs. Hamm and Reid abstained from voting on the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger,
only four of the six non-employee members of the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors voted to approve the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the Hiland Partners merger.
In determining that the Hiland Partners merger agreement is
advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland
Partners and the Hiland Partners public unitholders and
approving the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement, including the Hiland Partners merger, and
recommending that the Hiland Partners public unitholders vote
for the approval of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the
Hiland Partners merger, the Hiland Partners Board of Directors
considered a number of factors, including the following material
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the unanimous determination and recommendation of the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee;
|
|
|
|
the opinion of Jefferies & Company delivered orally at
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee meeting and presented at
the Hiland Partners Board of Directors meeting on June 1,
2009, and subsequently confirmed in writing, that, based upon
and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in the
opinion, the Hiland Partners merger consideration of $7.75 per
common unit to be received by the holders of common units of
Hiland Partners (other than the Hiland Partners rollover common
unitholders) pursuant to the Hiland Partners merger agreement
was fair, from a financial point of view, to the Hiland Partners
public unitholders, as of the date of such opinion, as described
in the opinion of Jefferies & Company;
|
|
|
|
the financial presentation of Jefferies & Company in
connection with the foregoing opinion that was presented to the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors at the request of the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee;
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Hiland Partners merger consideration and the
other terms of the Hiland Partners merger agreement resulted
from negotiations between the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee and Mr. Hamm, and the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors belief that $7.75 in cash for each Hiland
Partners common unit represented the highest per common unit
consideration that could be negotiated; and
|
|
|
|
the factors considered by the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee, including the positive factors and potential benefits
of the Hiland Partners merger agreement, the risks and
potentially negative factors relating to the Hiland Partners
merger agreement, and the factors relating to procedural
safeguards, each as described in The Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee above.
|
In doing so, the Hiland Partners Board of Directors expressly
adopted the analysis of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee,
which is discussed above.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the Hiland Partners Board of Directors includes
the material factors considered by the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors. In view of the variety of factors considered in
connection with its evaluation of the Hiland Partners merger,
the Hiland Partners Board of Directors did not find it
practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign
relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching
its determination and recommendation. In addition, individual
directors may have given different weights to different factors.
The Hiland Partners Board of Directors approved and recommends
the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger based upon the totality of the information presented to
and considered by it.
The Hiland Partners Board of Directors did not consider
liquidation value in determining the fairness of the Hiland
Partners merger to the Hiland Partners public unitholders
because of its belief, after considering the factors considered
by the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, that liquidation
value does not present a meaningful valuation for Hiland
Partners and its business as Hiland Partners value is
derived from the cash flows generated from its continuing
operations rather than from the value of assets that might be
realized in a liquidation.
The Hiland Partners Board of Directors also did not consider net
book value in determining the fairness of the merger to the
Hiland Partners public unitholders because of its belief, after
considering the factors considered by the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee, that net book value does not present a
meaningful valuation metric for Hiland Partners and its business
as Hiland Partners value is derived from the cash flows
generated from its continuing operations.
The Hiland Partners Board of Directors believes that the Hiland
Partners merger is procedurally fair because (1) of the
independence, absence of conflicts of interest and role and
actions of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee members
(permitting them to represent effectively the interests of the
Hiland Partners public unitholders), (2) of the approval of
the Hiland Partners merger agreement by a majority of the
directors who are not employees of Hiland Partners and
(3) the terms of the Hiland Partners merger agreement
require the approval of a majority of the publicly-held Hiland
Partners common units. The Hiland Partners Board of Directors
believes that each of these procedural safeguards supports its
decision and provides assurance of the fairness of the Hiland
Partners merger to the Hiland Partners public unitholders.
Opinion
of Financial Advisor of Hiland Partners
Jefferies & Company was engaged to render an opinion
to the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee as to whether the
merger consideration of $7.75 in cash per common unit to be
received by the Hiland Partners public unitholders pursuant to
the Hiland Partners merger agreement was fair, from a financial
point of view, to such holders. On June 1, 2009,
Jefferies & Company delivered to the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in
writing, that, as of the date of its opinion, based upon and
subject to the assumptions, limitations, qualifications and
factors contained in its opinion, the merger consideration to be
received by the Hiland Partners public unitholders pursuant to
the Hiland Partners merger agreement was fair, from a financial
point of view, to such holders. The June 1, 2009 opinion of
Jefferies & Company is referred to hereinafter in this
Opinion of Jefferies & Company, Inc.
section as the opinion.
59
The full text of the opinion is attached as Annex C to
this joint proxy statement and incorporated into this joint
proxy statement by reference. We urge you to read the opinion in
its entirety for the assumptions made, procedures followed,
other matters considered and limits of the review undertaken in
arriving at the opinion.
The opinion is for the use and benefit of the general partner of
Hiland Partners and the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee in
their consideration of the Hiland Partners merger. The opinion
does not address the relative merits of the transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger agreement as compared
to any alternative transaction or opportunity that might be
available to Hiland Partners, nor does it address the underlying
business decision by Hiland Partners to engage in the Hiland
Partners merger or the terms of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement or the documents referred to therein. The opinion does
not constitute a recommendation as to whether any holder of
common units should vote on the Hiland Partners merger or any
matter related thereto. In addition, the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee did not ask Jefferies & Company to
address, and the opinion does not address, the fairness to, or
any other consideration of, the holders of any class of
securities, creditors or other constituencies of Hiland
Partners, other than the holders of common units of Hiland
Partners. Jefferies & Company expresses no opinion as
to the price at which common units will trade at any time.
Furthermore, Jefferies & Company does not express any
view or opinion as to the fairness, financial or otherwise, of
the amount or nature of any compensation payable to or to be
received by, any of Hiland Partners officers, directors or
employees, or any such class of such persons, in connection with
the Hiland Partners merger agreement relative to the merger
consideration to be received by holders of common units. The
opinion has been authorized by a Fairness Committee of
Jefferies & Company.
In arriving at its opinion, Jefferies & Company has,
among other things:
(i) reviewed a draft of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement dated May 28, 2009;
(ii) reviewed certain publicly available financial and
other information about Hiland Partners;
(iii) reviewed certain information furnished by Hiland
Partners management, including financial forecasts and
analyses, relating to the business, operations and prospects of
Hiland Partners;
(iv) held discussions with members of senior management of
Hiland Partners concerning the matters described in
clauses (ii) and (iii) above;
(v) reviewed the trading price history and valuation
multiples for the common units and compared them with those of
certain publicly traded entities that Jefferies &
Company deemed relevant;
(vi) compared the proposed financial terms of the Hiland
Partners merger under the Hiland Partners merger agreement with
the financial terms of certain other transactions that
Jefferies & Company deemed relevant; and
(vii) conducted such other financial studies, analyses and
investigations as Jefferies & Company deemed
appropriate.
In Jefferies & Companys review and analysis and
in rendering its opinion, Jefferies & Company assumed
and relied upon, but did not assume any responsibility to
independently investigate or verify, the accuracy and
completeness of all financial and other information that was
supplied or otherwise made available to Jefferies &
Company or that was publicly available (including, without
limitation, the information described above), or that was
otherwise reviewed by Jefferies & Company. In
Jefferies & Companys review,
Jefferies & Company did not obtain any independent
evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities, nor
did Jefferies & Company conduct a physical inspection
of any of the properties or facilities, of Hiland Partners, nor
was Jefferies & Company furnished with any such
evaluations or appraisals of such physical inspections, nor does
Jefferies & Company have any responsibility to obtain
any such evaluations or appraisals.
With respect to the financial forecasts provided to and examined
by Jefferies & Company, Jefferies & Company
notes that projecting future results of any company is
inherently subject to uncertainty. Hiland Partners informed
Jefferies & Company, however, and
Jefferies & Company assumed, that such financial
forecasts were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best
currently available estimates and good faith
60
judgments of the management of Hiland Partners as to the future
financial performance of Hiland Partners. Jefferies &
Company expresses no opinion as to any such financial forecasts
or the assumptions on which they were made.
Jefferies & Companys opinion was based on
economic, monetary, regulatory, market and other conditions
existing and that could be evaluated as of the date of its
opinion. Jefferies & Company has no obligation to
advise any person of any change in any fact or matter affecting
its opinion of which Jefferies & Company may have
become aware after the date of its opinion.
Jefferies & Company made no independent investigation
of any legal or accounting matters affecting Hiland Partners,
and Jefferies & Company assumed the correctness in all
respects material to its analysis of all legal and accounting
advice given to Hiland Partners and the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors, including, without limitation, advice as to the
legal, accounting and tax consequences of the terms of, and
transactions contemplated by, the Hiland Partners merger
agreement to Hiland Partners and the holders of Hiland Partners
common units. In addition, in preparing its opinion,
Jefferies & Company did not take into account any tax
consequences of the transaction to any holder of Hiland Partners
common units. Jefferies & Company assumed that the
final form of the Hiland Partners merger agreement would be
substantially similar to the draft, dated May 28, 2009,
reviewed by Jefferies & Company. Jefferies &
Company also assumed that, in the course of obtaining the
necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and
releases for the Hiland Partners merger, no delay, limitation,
restriction or condition would be imposed that would have an
adverse effect on Hiland Partners, Parent or the contemplated
benefits of the Hiland Partners merger in any way meaningful to
Jefferies & Companys analysis.
The following is a brief summary of the analyses performed by
Jefferies & Company in connection with its opinion.
This summary is not intended to be an exhaustive description of
the analyses performed by Jefferies & Company but
includes all material factors considered by
Jefferies & Company in rendering its opinion.
Jefferies & Company drew no specific conclusions from
any individual analysis, but subjectively factored its
observations from all of these analyses into its qualitative
assessment of the merger consideration. Each analysis performed
by Jefferies & Company is a common methodology
utilized in determining valuations. Although other valuation
techniques may exist, Jefferies & Company believes
that the analyses described below, when taken as a whole,
provide the most appropriate analyses for Jefferies &
Company to arrive at its opinion.
Comparable
Public Company Analysis
Jefferies & Company utilized comparable public company
analysis, which values a target company by reference to
publicly-traded companies with similar products, similar
operating and financial characteristics and similar service
markets. Jefferies & Company reviewed and compared
selected financial data for eleven publicly traded companies in
the energy industry. Five of the companies chosen derived more
than 50% of their estimated 2009 cash flow from fee-based
contracts, and six of the companies chosen derived more than 50%
of their estimated 2009 cash flow from non fee-based contracts,
although Copano Energy, L.L.C. was excluded from trimmed mean
calculations due to its significant hedge positions that reduce
sensitivity to commodity prices over the next three years.
Hiland Partners has a high percentage of its contract mix tied
to non-fee based revenue streams, which are sensitive to
commodity prices. The comparable companies chosen by
Jefferies & Company included:
Fee-Based
|
|
|
|
|
Crosstex Energy, L.P.
|
|
|
|
DCP Midstream Partners, LP
|
|
|
|
Quicksilver Gas Services LP
|
|
|
|
Regency Energy Partners LP
|
|
|
|
Western Gas Partners, LP
|
61
Non
Fee-Based
|
|
|
|
|
Atlas Pipeline Partners, LP
|
|
|
|
Copano Energy, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Targa Resources Partners LP
|
|
|
|
Williams Partners L.P.
|
For each of the comparable companies, Jefferies &
Company calculated the total enterprise value as a multiple of
(i) that companys revenue for the noted last twelve
month (LTM) periods; (ii) that companys
projected revenue, to the extent available, for the year ending
December 31, 2009, as reflected in certain First Call
estimates; (iii) that companys projected revenue, to
the extent available, for the year ending December 31,
2010, as reflected in certain First Call estimates;
(iv) that companys estimated EBITDA for the noted LTM
periods; (v) that companys EBITDA, to the extent
available, for the year ending December 31, 2009, as
reflected in certain First Call estimates; and (vi) that
companys estimated EBITDA, to the extent available, for
the year ending December 31, 2010, as reflected in certain
First Call estimates. Total enterprise value (TEV)
was calculated as equity market value, plus net debt, all as of
May 28, 2009. Net debt equals total debt plus minority
interest less cash and cash equivalents. Jefferies &
Company then calculated each companys distributable cash
yield using (a) that companys most recent declared
distribution, annualized, divided by that companys unit
price as of May 28, 2009, (b) that companys
estimated distributable cash, to the extent available, for the
year ending December 31, 2009, as reflected in certain
First Call estimates and dividing by that companys unit
price as of May 28, 2009, and (c) that companys
estimated distributable cash, to the extent available, for the
year ending December 31, 2010, as reflected in certain
first call estimates and dividing by that companys unit
price as of May 28, 2009.
Utilizing the most representative multiple range within the
comparable public company set, Jefferies & Company
then calculated a range of implied values per common unit based
on (i) Hiland Partners LTM EBITDA; (ii) Hiland
Partners projected EBITDA for the year ending
December 31, 2009, based on Hiland Partners
managements estimates, where the estimated downside
projected EBITDA assumed inlet natural gas volumes were risked
at 95%; and (iii) Hiland Partners projected EBITDA
for the year ending December 31, 2010, based on Hiland
Partners managements estimates, where the estimated
downside projected EBITDA assumed inlet natural gas volumes were
risked at 95%. Jefferies & Company then calculated a
range of implied values per common unit by dividing
(i) Hiland Partners current distributable cash;
(ii) Hiland Partners projected distributable cash for
the year ending December 31, 2009, based on Hiland Partners
managements estimates; and (iii) Hiland
Partners projected distributable cash for the year ending
December 31, 2010, based on Hiland Partners
managements estimates, in each case, by the most
representative range of distributable cash yields within the
comparable public company set. The resulting ranges of implied
values per common unit are set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Multiple
|
|
Hiland Partners
|
|
|
Implied per Unit
|
|
|
Range
|
|
Metric (Millions)
|
|
|
Value Range
|
|
TEV/LTM EBITDA
|
|
5.7x - 6.7x
|
|
$
|
62.9
|
|
|
$9.94 - $16.53
|
TEV/EBITDA 2009E
|
|
7.2x - 8.2x
|
|
$
|
44.8
|
|
|
$4.73 - $10.98(1)
|
TEV/EBITDA 2010E
|
|
6.8x - 7.8x
|
|
$
|
48.0
|
|
|
$3.76 - $11.46(1)
|
Current Distributable Cash Yield
|
|
7.1% - 17.1%
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$0.00
|
Distributable Cash Yield 2009E
|
|
7.4% - 17.4%
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$0.00
|
Distributable Cash Yield 2010E
|
|
7.5% - 17.5%
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$0.00
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Downside assumes inlet natural gas volumes risked at 95%. |
62
Jefferies & Company then compared the ranges of
implied values per common unit against (i) the Hiland
Partners closing unit price of $5.40 per unit on May 28,
2009; and (ii) the merger consideration of $7.75 per unit
to be received by the Hiland Partners public unitholders.
No company utilized in the comparable public company analysis is
identical to Hiland Partners. Jefferies & Company made
judgments and assumptions with regard to industry performance,
general business, economic, market and financial conditions and
other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Hiland
Partners. Mathematical analysis of comparable public companies
in isolation from other analyses is not an effective method of
evaluating transactions.
Premiums
Paid Analysis
Jefferies & Company utilized a premiums paid analysis,
a method of valuing a target business by analyzing the premiums
paid in selected merger and acquisition transactions. Using
publicly available information, Jefferies & Company
conducted a premiums paid analysis of 19 change of control
transactions involving target companies in the energy industry
announced since April 7, 2004.
For each of the target companies involved in the 19
transactions, Jefferies & Company examined the closing
unit price one trading day prior to announcement of the initial
offer in connection with each transaction in order to calculate
the high and low premiums paid by the acquiror over the target
companys closing unit price at such point in time.
Jefferies & Company then compared those premiums to
(i) the premium implied by the January 15 Proposal of $9.50
per common unit of Hiland Partners over Hiland Partners
common unit price on one trading day prior to the announcement
of the January 15 Proposal ($7.90), and (ii) the $7.75
proposed merger consideration over Hiland Partners common
unit price on one trading day prior to the announcement of the
revised offer of $7.75 per common unit of Hiland Partners
($8.18). Jefferies & Company believed that this method
was less illustrative of value because of the significant
deterioration in Hiland Partners operations since the date
of the January 15 Proposal. A summary of the premiums observed
in the premiums paid analysis is set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Percentage
|
|
One Day Prior
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
Mean
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
Median
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
Low
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Implied Equity Price Per Unit of the January 15 Proposal
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
10.61
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
Implied Equity Price Per Unit of the Merger
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
10.99
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
8.38
|
|
Implied Merger Premium Per Unit
|
|
|
|
|
January 15 Proposal of $9.50/unit
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
Merger Consideration of $7.75/unit
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Jefferies & Company utilized discounted cash flow
analysis, which values a company as the sum of its unlevered
(before financing costs) free cash flows over a forecast period
and the companys terminal or residual value at the end of
the forecast period. Jefferies & Company examined the
value of Hiland Partners based on projected free cash flow
estimates, which were generated utilizing financial projections
from April 1, 2009 through December 31, 2013. Those
internal financial projections were prepared by Hiland
Partners management and were approved for
Jefferies & Companys use by the Hiland Partners
Conflict Committee. As instructed by Hiland Partners,
Jefferies & Company considered the risks and
uncertainties of achieving the
63
Hiland Partners forecasts and the possibility that the Hiland
Partners forecasts will not be realized. Accordingly,
Jefferies & Company performed a sensitivity analysis
to illustrate the effect of different assumptions for changes in
projected annual revenue growth and projected annual EBITDA
margins from the Hiland Partners management forecasts.
Jefferies & Company ascribed EBITDA exit multiples,
which ranged from 7.5x to 8.5x, to the projected EBITDA for the
LTM ending December 31, 2013, giving effect to
Jefferies & Companys sensitivity analysis.
Jefferies & Company calculated a range of discount
factors of 18.0% 20.0% based on the Capital Asset
Pricing Model using the average levered beta of the comparable
public companies listed in the Comparable Public Company
Analysis section. Based on those ranges of EBITDA exit
multiples and discount rates, Jefferies & Company
calculated the implied equity price per common unit value
ranging from $0.00 to $2.35. Jefferies & Company then
compared the implied equity prices per common unit values
against the $7.75 per common unit in cash to be received in the
Hiland Partners merger.
While discounted cash flow analysis is a widely accepted and
practiced valuation methodology, it relies on a number of
assumptions, including growth rates and discount rates. The
valuation derived from the discounted cash flow analysis is not
necessarily indicative of Hiland Partners present or
future value or results. Discounted cash flow analysis in
isolation from other analyses is not an effective method of
evaluating transactions.
Conclusion
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and
is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. In arriving at its opinion, Jefferies &
Company considered the results of all of its analyses as a whole
and did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or
factor considered by it. Furthermore, Jefferies &
Company believes that selecting any portion of its analysis,
without considering all analyses, would create an incomplete
view of the process underlying its opinion. In performing its
analyses, Jefferies & Company made numerous
assumptions with respect to industry performance and general
business and economic conditions and other matters, many of
which are beyond the control of Hiland Partners. The analyses
performed by Jefferies & Company are not necessarily
indicative of actual values or actual future results, which may
be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such
analyses. Jefferies & Company did not recommend any
specific consideration to the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee or that any specific consideration constituted the
only appropriate consideration with respect to the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, including the Hiland Partners merger. A copy of the
presentation materials presented by Jefferies &
Company to the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee in connection
with the delivery of its opinion has been filed with the SEC as
an exhibit to the
Schedule 13E-3
filed by Hiland Partners.
Miscellaneous
Jefferies & Company may seek, in the future, to
provide financial advisory and financing services to Hiland
Partners, the general partner of Hiland Partners or entities
that are affiliated with Hiland Partners or its general partner,
for which Jefferies & Company would expect to receive
compensation.
Jefferies & Company was engaged by the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee in connection with the delivery of the
opinion and is entitled to a fee of $550,000 for its services
from Hiland Partners, a portion of which was payable prior to
the delivery of the opinion and the remainder of which was
payable upon the delivery of the opinion. Jefferies &
Company also will be reimbursed for expenses incurred. Hiland
Partners has agreed to indemnify Jefferies & Company
against liabilities arising out of or in connection with the
services rendered and to be rendered by Jefferies &
Company under such engagement.
In the ordinary course of its business, Jefferies &
Company and its affiliates maintain a market in the securities
of Hiland Partners and may trade or hold securities of Hiland
Partners
and/or its
affiliates for Jefferies & Company and its
affiliates own accounts and for accounts of their
customers and, accordingly, may, at any time hold long or short
positions in those securities.
64
Position
of HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons as to the Fairness of the Hiland Partners
Merger
Under SEC rules, Parent, HLND Merger Sub, Hiland Holdings, the
general partner of Hiland Holdings, and Messrs. Hamm,
Griffin and Harrison (collectively the HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons) are required to provide certain
information regarding their position as to the substantive and
procedural fairness of the Hiland Partners merger to the Hiland
Partners public unitholders. The HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons are making the statements included in this
section solely for purposes of complying with such requirements.
The HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons views as to the fairness of the Hiland
Partners merger should not be construed as a recommendation to
any unitholder as to how that unitholder should vote on the
proposals to approve the Hiland Partners merger agreement and
the Hiland Partners merger.
The HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons, other than Messrs. Griffin and Harrison,
did not participate in the deliberations of the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors or the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
regarding, and did not receive advice from the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committees legal or financial advisors as to,
the fairness of the Hiland Partners merger. Mr. Hamm
engaged Wachovia Securities as his financial advisor to provide
certain financial advisory services with respect to a potential
acquisition by Mr. Hamm
and/or
certain of his affiliates of the assets or capital stock of the
Hiland Companies. Wachovia Securities did not provide an opinion
with respect to the fairness of the Hiland Partners merger or
the Hiland Partners merger consideration.
The discussion below of the information and factors considered
by the HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes
the material factors considered by the HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons. In view of the variety of factors considered in
connection with their evaluation of the fairness of Hiland
Partners merger, the HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons did not find it practicable to, and did not,
quantify or otherwise assign specific weights to the factors
considered in reaching their determination. In addition, each of
the HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons may have given differing weights to different
factors. On balance, the HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons believed that the positive factors discussed
above outweighed the negative factors discussed above and
arrived at the conclusion that the Hiland Partners merger was
fair to the Hiland Partners public unitholders.
The HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons, other than Messrs. Griffin and Harrison,
believe that the Hiland Partners merger consideration is
substantively fair to the Hiland Partners public unitholders
based on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
The HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons view that if the adverse impact of
commodity prices on gathering and processing fundamentals and
the challenges presented by the global economic crisis persist,
Hiland Partners will experience a meaningful decrease in future
distributable cash flow and will need substantial new equity
capital to remain in continued compliance with the financial
covenants under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. Obtaining
such equity capital in the current environment on acceptable
terms does not appear feasible and would be significantly
dilutive to current unitholders.
|
|
|
|
The consideration proposed to be paid to the Hiland Partners
public unitholders represents a 45% premium over the reported
closing sale price $5.36 per common unit of Hiland Partners on
May 29, 2009, the last trading day prior to the execution
of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and a 34% premium over
the average closing sale price of $5.78 per common unit of
Hiland Partners over the
30-day
period ending May 29, 2009.
|
|
|
|
The consideration to be paid to the Hiland Partners public
unitholders in the Hiland Partners merger is all cash, thus
eliminating any uncertainty in valuing the consideration to be
received by such unitholders.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners merger will provide liquidity for the Hiland
Partners public unitholders without incurring brokerage and
other costs typically associated with market sales.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners merger agreement allows the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee to withdraw or change its recommendation of
the Hiland Partners merger agreement, and to terminate the
merger agreement in certain circumstances.
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
The obligations of Parent and HLND Merger Sub to consummate the
Hiland Partners merger are not subject to any financing
condition. Mr. Hamm has delivered to Parent the Hiland
Partners commitment letter, pursuant to which Mr. Hamm has
committed to contribute an aggregate of approximately
$32.0 million in cash to Parent, representing the Hiland
Partners merger consideration of approximately
$30.9 million and estimated expenses of approximately
$1.1 million, less the amount of cash, if any, contributed
by the Hamm family trusts to Parent or HLND Merger Sub that is
available immediately prior to the closing of the Hiland
Partners merger. Pursuant to its terms, Hiland Partners is a
third-party beneficiary of the Hiland Partners commitment letter.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee received an opinion from
Jefferies & Company to the effect that, as of the date
of the opinion and based upon and subject to the assumptions and
limitations set forth therein, the cash merger consideration of
$7.75 per common unit to be received by the holders of Hiland
Partners common units (other than the Hiland Partners rollover
common unitholders) pursuant to the Hiland Partners merger
agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
Hiland Partners public unitholders. Jefferies &
Companys opinion is attached to this joint proxy statement
as Annex C.
|
The HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons, other than Messrs. Griffin and Harrison,
believe that the Hiland Partners merger is procedurally fair to
the Hiland Partners public unitholders based on the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, which consists of
directors who are not officers, employees or controlling
unitholders of Hiland Partners, or affiliated with the Hamm
Continuing Investors, negotiated with Mr. Hamm the terms of
the Hiland Partners merger. The HLND Schedule 13E-3 Filing
Persons believe that the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee was
therefore able to represent the interests of the Hiland Partners
public unitholders without the potential conflicts of interest
that the foregoing relationships would otherwise have presented.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee retained its own
nationally recognized financial advisor, Jefferies &
Company which, in the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees
view, had no relationships that would compromise its
independence.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee retained its own legal
advisor, Conner and Winters, which the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee determined had no relationship creating a potential
conflict.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and its advisors
conducted a due diligence investigation of Hiland Partners
before commencing negotiations, which the HLND Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons believe provided the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee and its advisors with the information necessary to
effectively represent the interests of the Hiland Partners
public unitholders.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee had the authority to
review alternative proposals and to reject the transaction
proposed by Mr. Hamm.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners merger consideration and other terms and
conditions of the Hiland Partners merger agreement were the
result of negotiations between Mr. Hamm and the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee and their respective financial and
legal advisors. The Hamm Continuing Investors did not
participate in or have any influence over the conclusions
reached by the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee or the
negotiating positions of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger were approved unanimously by the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee, which determined that the Hiland Partners
merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger are advisable,
fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland Partners and the
Hiland Partners public unitholders. The Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the Hiland Partners merger were also recommended
to the Hiland Partners public unitholders unanimously by the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, which further recommended
that the Hiland Partners Board of Directors recommend approval
of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger to the Hiland Partners public unitholders.
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Partners Board of Directors approved, and recommended
that the Hiland Partners public unitholders vote to approve, the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger.
The action by the Hiland Partners Board of Directors represented
the unanimous approval of the directors of Hiland Partners,
other than Messrs. Hamm and Reid who recused themselves
from voting.
|
Messrs. Griffin and Harrison believe that the Hiland
Partners merger is both substantively and procedurally fair to
the Hiland Partners public unitholders based on the factors
described in Recommendation of the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee and the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors; Reasons for Recommending Approval of the
Merger The Hiland Partners Board of Directors
beginning on page 57.
Recommendations
of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors; Reasons for Recommending Approval of the
Merger
The
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee consists of two
independent directors: Dr. Bobby B. Lyle and
Dr. Cheryl L. Evans. In resolutions approved by the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors on February 19, 2009, the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee was authorized to review,
evaluate and make recommendations to the Hiland Holdings Board
of Directors with respect to Mr. Hamms proposed
acquisition of the publicly-held Hiland Holdings common units
and potential alternative transactions. The Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee retained Barclays Capital as its independent
financial advisor, Fulbright as its independent legal counsel
and Morris Nichols as its independent special Delaware legal
counsel. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee oversaw the
performance of financial and legal due diligence by its
advisors, conducted an extensive review and evaluation of
Mr. Hamms proposal and potential alternative
transactions and conducted negotiations with Mr. Hamm and
their representatives with respect to the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the various other agreements related to the Hiland
Holdings merger.
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, by unanimous vote at a
meeting held on June 1, 2009, determined that the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement were advisable, fair to,
and in the best interests of, Hiland Holdings and the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders. In addition, at the June 1,
2009 meeting, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
recommended that (1) the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
approve the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the related
agreements, and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the Hiland Holdings merger and
(2) the Hiland Holdings public unitholders vote in favor of
approval of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland
Holdings merger. In reaching its determination, the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee consulted with and received the
advice of its independent financial and legal advisors,
considered the potential alternatives of Hiland Holdings,
including the uncertainties and risks facing it, and considered
the interests of the Hiland Holdings public unitholders.
In determining that the Hiland Holdings merger agreement was
advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland
Holdings and the Hiland Holdings public unitholders and
recommending the approval of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the related agreements, and the consummation of
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Hiland
Holdings merger, to the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors on
June 1, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
considered a number of factors. The material factors are
summarized below.
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee viewed the following
factors as being generally positive or favorable in coming to
its determination and recommendation:
1. The Hiland Holdings merger would provide the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders with cash consideration of $2.40 per
common unit, a price the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
viewed as fair in light of recent and projected financial
performance of Hiland Holdings and recent trading prices of the
Hiland Holdings common units. In making this determination, the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee also considered that Hiland
Holdings only cash flowing assets are its partnership
interests in Hiland Partners, consisting of 2,321,471 common
units, 3,060,000 subordinated units, the 2% general partner
interest and all the incentive distribution rights, and,
moreover, that on April 27, 2009 Hiland Partners
67
announced the suspension of quarterly distributions on the
common units and subordinated units beginning with the first
quarter of 2009. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee also
considered the following related facts:
|
|
|
|
|
Since Hiland Partners suspended distributions on the common
units, the amount of common unit arrearages that have been
accumulated through June 1, 2009 is approximately
$2.8 million. Based on the number of common units of Hiland
Partners outstanding as of June 1, 2009, approximately
$2.8 million in common unit arrearages will accumulate each
quarter until Hiland Partners resumes paying the MQD. Therefore,
the likelihood of Hiland Holdings receiving the minimum
quarterly distribution in the future on its subordinated units
in Hiland Partners is significantly less than its likelihood of
receiving the minimum quarterly distribution on its common units.
|
|
|
|
Additionally, as a result of the suspension in distributions on
the subordinated units, the likelihood of the subordinated units
meeting the tests for conversion into common units after
March 31, 2010 has been significantly reduced. In order for
the subordinated units to convert, Hiland Partners must have
earned and paid the minimum quarterly distribution on all
outstanding units for three consecutive four-quarter periods. In
addition to being subordinated to the common units with respect
to distributions, including liquidating distributions, the
subordinated units are not publicly traded and therefore they
are a more illiquid asset than common units, which impairs their
value.
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, no distributions may be made on the incentive
distributions rights until the minimum quarterly distribution
has been paid on all outstanding Hiland Partners common units
and subordinated units. Therefore, the likelihood of Hiland
Holdings receiving distributions in the future on its incentive
distribution rights is significantly less than its likelihood of
receiving the minimum quarterly distribution on its subordinated
units. For the third quarter of 2008, the last quarter in which
distributions related to the incentive distribution rights were
paid, approximately 31% of the cash distributions received by
Hiland Holdings from Hiland Partners were the payment of the
minimum quarterly distribution on the common units and the
commensurate general partner interest, approximately 37% were
the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the
subordinated units and the commensurate general partner interest
and approximately 31% were the payment of distributions on all
units and the incentive distribution rights above the minimum
quarterly distribution.
|
2. The opinion received by the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee from its financial advisor, Barclays Capital,
delivered orally at the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
meeting on June 1, 2009, and subsequently confirmed in
writing later that day, to the effect that as of the date of the
opinion, the $2.40 per common unit cash merger consideration to
be received by the Hiland Holdings public unitholders, pursuant
to the Hiland Holdings merger, was fair, from a financial point
of view, to those holders.
3. The presentation of Barclays Capital on June 1,
2009, in connection with the foregoing opinion, which is
described under Opinion of Financial Advisor
of Hiland Holdings.
4. The difficult business environment currently facing the
Hiland Companies, including commodity prices, in particular
natural gas prices, and the significant reduction in drilling
activity and the resulting negative effect on the financial
condition and results of operations of the Hiland Companies.
5. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees belief
that there were no alternatives to the April 20 Revised Proposal
that would likely be viable or financially superior to the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders. In that regard, the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee noted that:
|
|
|
|
|
it was very likely that Hiland Partners would be in violation of
the leverage ratio covenant under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement as soon as June 30, 2009, and that the Hiland
Companies could not continue operating without resolving this
potential default;
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
obtaining a waiver or amendment under the Hiland Operating
Credit Agreement in the absence of a significant equity
injection by Mr. Hamm or some other party would very likely
involve a significant upfront restructuring fee, a significant
increase in the applicable interest rate, and an indefinite
suspension of distributions from Hiland Partners, resulting in
the buildup of arrearages with respect to the common units of
Hiland Partners and a decrease in value of the subordinated
units and incentive distribution rights held directly or
indirectly by Hiland Holdings;
|
|
|
|
it was very unlikely that the Hiland Companies could replace the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement with a new credit facility,
refinance the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement through the
issuance of other debt instruments, or exchange all or a portion
of its existing indebtedness under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement for equity securities;
|
|
|
|
it was very unlikely that the Hiland Companies could raise
sufficient equity capital to pay down the indebtedness under the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement through a public or private
issuance of equity securities, including an issuance of
structured equity investment by Mr. Hamm (particularly as
Mr. Hamm had indicated that he had determined not to pursue
such an investment);
|
|
|
|
a sale of strategic assets by Hiland Partners was not an
attractive option as the market for assets of the nature of
Hiland Partners assets is very challenging and the most
likely purchasers are themselves experiencing financial
difficulties and have little access to acquisition
capital; and
|
|
|
|
it was unlikely that any other transaction with a third party
involving a sale of the Hiland Companies or a significant
interest in the Hiland Companies could be consummated at this
time in light of the position of Mr. Hamm (contained in his
letter, dated January 15, 2009, to the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors and subsequently confirmed to the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee), that he was interested only in
acquiring common units in the Hiland Companies and that he was
not interested in selling (or causing his affiliates to sell)
interests in the Hiland Companies, and the lack of any
indications of interest from any third parties since the public
announcement of the January 15 Proposal.
|
6. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees belief
that the $2.40 per common unit cash merger consideration
represented the highest per common unit consideration that could
be negotiated.
7. The terms of the Hiland Holdings commitment letter from
Mr. Hamm to Parent to fund the full amount of the HPGP
Parent Parties obligation to pay the merger consideration,
including the provision making the Holdings Parties third-party
beneficiaries under the Hiland Holdings commitment letter.
8. The terms of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement,
principally:
|
|
|
|
|
all of the outstanding common units not held by Harold Hamm,
Continental Gas and the Hamm family trusts (and restricted
common units held by officers and employees of Hiland Holdings)
will be converted into the right to receive cash at $2.40 per
common unit;
|
|
|
|
the requirement that the Hiland Holdings merger and Hiland
Holdings merger agreement be approved by a vote of the holders
of a majority of the Hiland Holdings common units held by Hiland
Holdings public unitholders entitled to vote thereon voting as a
class;
|
|
|
|
the limited nature of the operational representations and
warranties given by Hiland Holdings and the fact that the
representations and warranties of Hiland Holdings do not survive
the closing of the Hiland Holdings merger;
|
|
|
|
the inability of the HPGP Parent Parties to refuse to close the
Hiland Holdings merger as the result of a failure of Hiland
Operating to be in compliance with certain financial covenants
of the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the provision limiting the ability of the HPGP Parent Parties to
close the Hiland Partners merger without closing the Hiland
Holdings merger, unless the Hiland Holdings public unitholders
fail to approve the Hiland Holdings merger and the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement;
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of a financing condition to the HPGP Parent
Parties obligation to consummate the transaction;
|
|
|
|
the provision allowing the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors or
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee to withdraw or change
its recommendation of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and
the Hiland Holdings merger if it makes a good faith
determination that a change or withdrawal would be in the best
interests of the Hiland Holdings public unitholders, subject to
providing the HPGP Parent Parties with advance notice; and
|
|
|
|
the provisions allowing for the Holdings Parties to participate
in negotiations with a third party in response to an unsolicited
alternative proposal which may, in certain circumstances, result
in a superior proposal; and
|
|
|
|
the lack of a
break-up fee
for termination of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement in
accordance with its terms, although Hiland Holdings may be
liable to reimburse the expenses of the HPGP Parent Parties in
certain limited circumstances if the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement is terminated.
|
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee considered the following
factors to be generally negative or unfavorable in making its
determination and recommendation:
1. The Hiland Holdings public unitholders will have no
ongoing equity participation in Hiland Holdings following the
Hiland Holdings merger, and such unitholders will cease to
participate in Hiland Holdings future earnings or growth,
if any, or benefit from increases, if any, in the value of
Hiland Holdings common units and would not participate in
any potential future sale of Hiland Holdings to a third party.
2. Given that Mr. Hamm (who together with Continental
Gas and the Hamm family trusts own a 60.8% limited partner
interest in Hiland Holdings) had publicly expressed an interest
only in acquiring common units of the Hiland Companies and no
interest in selling, or causing his affiliates to sell,
interests in the Hiland Companies, it would be impracticable to
sell the general partner of Hiland Partners or Hiland Partners
without his approval. Therefore no attempt was made to contact,
third parties that might otherwise consider an acquisition of
Hiland Holdings. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
recognized that it was possible (although did not consider it to
be likely) that a sale process open to all possible bidders
might result in a higher sale price than the cash consideration
payable in the Hiland Holdings merger.
3. The Hiland Holdings merger agreements limitation
on Hiland Holdings ability to solicit third party offers.
4. The possibility that the Hamm Continuing Investors could
sell some or all of Hiland Holdings, as the surviving entity
following the Hiland Holdings merger, or its assets to one or
more purchasers at a valuation higher than that available in the
Hiland Holdings merger.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee is not
intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material factors
considered by the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee. In view
of the variety of factors considered in connection with its
evaluation of the Hiland Holdings merger, the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee did not find it practicable to, and did not,
quantify or otherwise assign specific weights to the factors
considered in reaching its determination and recommendation. In
addition, each of the members of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee may have given differing weights to different factors.
On balance, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee believed
that the positive factors discussed above outweighed the
negative factors discussed above.
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee believes that sufficient
procedural safeguards were and are present to ensure the
fairness of the Hiland Holdings merger and to permit the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee to represent effectively the
interests of the Hiland Holdings public unitholders, each of
which the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee believes supports
its decision and provides assurance of the fairness of the
Hiland Holdings merger to the Hiland Holdings public
unitholders. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts
70
Committee believes that the process it followed in making its
determination and recommendation with respect to the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement was fair because:
1. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee consisted solely
of directors who are not officers or controlling unitholders of
Hiland Holdings, or affiliated with Mr. Hamm or any of the
Hamm Continuing Investors.
2. The members of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
were adequately compensated for their services and their
compensation was in no way contingent on their approving the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement or the Hiland Holdings merger.
3. Other than by the immediate vesting of any restricted
common units issued and outstanding to non-employee directors of
Hiland Holdings pursuant to the Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan immediately prior to the effective time of the
Hiland Holdings merger, the members of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee will not personally benefit from the
completion of the Hiland Holdings merger in a manner different
from the Hiland Holdings public unitholders.
4. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee retained and was
advised by independent legal counsel, Fulbright and Morris
Nichols, and an independent financial advisor, Barclays Capital.
5. Barclays Capitals right to receive its advisory
fee was not contingent upon it delivering a favorable opinion.
6. From the date that the January 15 Proposal was announced
to the time of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees
determination and recommendations, no third parties indicated
any interest in pursuing a transaction with Hiland Holdings or
Hiland Partners.
7. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and its legal
counsel and financial advisor conducted due diligence regarding
the Hiland Companies and their prospects and considered all
viable alternatives for Hiland Holdings in addition to the
proposed Hiland Holdings merger agreement.
8. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee received the
opinion of Barclays Capital that, as of June 1, 2009, and
based on and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in
the opinion, the merger consideration to be offered to the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders in the Hiland Holdings merger
was fair to such unitholders, from a financial point of view.
9. The requirement that the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger must be approved by
holders of a majority of the Hiland Holdings common units held
by Hiland Holdings public unitholders entitled to vote thereon
voting as a class.
10. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee was involved in
extensive deliberations over a period of approximately three
months regarding both the January 15 Proposal and the April 20
Revised Proposal.
11. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, with the
assistance of its legal and financial advisors, negotiated the
terms of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement on an
arms-length basis with Mr. Hamm and his legal and
financial advisors.
12. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee had the
ultimate authority to decide whether or not to proceed with the
proposed transaction or any alternatives, and the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors resolved not to recommend,
authorize, approve or endorse the January 15 Proposal or any
other merger, acquisition or similar proposal involving Hiland
Holdings and the Hamm Continuing Investors or any of their
affiliates unless such transaction was recommended to the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors by the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee.
13. The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee was aware that
it had no obligation to recommend any transaction, including the
proposal put forth by Mr. Hamm.
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee did not consider
liquidation value in determining the fairness of the Hiland
Partners merger to the Hiland Holdings public unitholders
because of its belief, after consulting
71
with its financial advisor, that liquidation value does not
present a meaningful valuation for Hiland Holdings and its
business because Hiland Holdings value is derived from the
cash flows generated from its continuing operations rather than
from the value of assets that might be realized in a liquidation.
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee also did not consider
net book value in determining the fairness of the merger to the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders because of its belief, after
consulting with its financial advisor, that net book value does
not present a meaningful valuation metric for Hiland Holdings
and its business because Hiland Holdings value is derived
from the cash flows generated from its continuing operations.
The
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
The Hiland Holdings Board of Directors consists of eight
directors: Harold Hamm, Joseph L. Griffin, Matthew S. Harrison,
Edward D. Doherty, Dr. Cheryl L. Evans, Michael L.
Greenwood, Dr. Bobby B. Lyle, and Rayford T. Reid.
The directors of Hiland Holdings have different interests in the
Hiland Holdings merger than the Hiland Holdings public
unitholders generally. In particular:
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates of Mr. Hamm, the Chairman of the Board of
Directors of each of the Hiland Companies, is a counterparty to
the Hiland Companies in each of the merger agreements and will
acquire, along with the Hamm family trusts, all of the
outstanding common units of each of the Hiland Companies not
already owned by the Hamm Continuing Investors (other than
certain restricted common units discussed below) pursuant to the
merger agreements.
|
|
|
|
six of the eight members of the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors serve as members of the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors, and therefore have certain duties and obligations to
the unitholders of each Hiland Company as provided in the
respective partnership agreements of the Hiland Companies;
|
|
|
|
the non-employee directors of Hiland Holdings hold restricted
common units of Hiland Holdings, which will vest immediately
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger and
automatically convert into the right to receive the Hiland
Holdings merger consideration in the Hiland Holdings merger;
|
|
|
|
if any employee directors of Hiland Holdings are granted
restricted common units, phantom units or unit options under the
Hiland Partners GP, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan or the Hiland
Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan in the ordinary course of
business prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings
merger or the Hiland Partners merger, as applicable, such equity
interests will remain outstanding following the effective time
of the Hiland Holdings merger or the Hiland Partners merger, as
applicable;
|
|
|
|
certain members of the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors hold
Hiland Partners common units which will convert into the right
to receive the Hiland Partners merger consideration in the
Hiland Partners merger;
|
|
|
|
certain members of the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors who
also serve on the Hiland Partners Board of Directors hold
restricted common units in Hiland Partners, which will vest
immediately prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners
merger and automatically convert into the right to receive the
Hiland Partners merger consideration in the Hiland Partners
merger;
|
|
|
|
the members of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees have
received payments in the amount of $30,000 each for their
consideration and negotiation of the mergers, which payments
were not contingent on any outcome of the consideration or
negotiations;
|
|
|
|
Joseph L. Griffin and Matthew S. Harrison, who are members of
the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of each of the Hiland
Companies, have been offered continued employment with the
surviving entities after the effective times of the mergers,
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
and may enter into or be provided new employment, retention and
compensation arrangements (although no such arrangements have
been proposed or agreed to); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
certain indemnification arrangements and insurance policies for
directors and officers of the general partner of Hiland Holdings
will be continued for six years by the surviving entity in the
Hiland Holdings merger if the Hiland Holdings merger is
completed.
|
For a complete discussion of these and other interests of the
members of the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors in the Hiland
Holdings merger, see Special Factors Interests
of Certain Persons in the Mergers.
Because of such actual and potential conflicts, the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors authorized the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee to review, evaluate and make recommendations
to the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors and the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders regarding Mr. Hamms
proposal and any potential alternatives thereto. On June 1,
2009, the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors met to consider the
report and recommendation of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee. On the basis of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committees recommendation and the other factors described
below, each of the six members of the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors participating in the meeting unanimously
(1) determined that the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, including the Hiland Holdings merger, were advisable,
fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland Holdings and the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders and (2) recommended that
the Hiland Holdings public unitholders vote to approve the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger.
Neither of Messrs. Hamm nor Reid participated in the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors consideration or vote on these
matters. Mr. Hamm did not feel his participation was
appropriate given that the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
was evaluating his offer to acquire Hiland Holdings.
Mr. Reid did not feel participation was appropriate given
his professional relationship with Mr. Hamm, through which
he has historically provided Mr. Hamm and the Hamm family
trusts with financial advisory services, including in connection
with evaluating strategic alternatives with respect to the
Hiland Companies.
Because Messrs. Hamm and Reid abstained from voting on the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger,
only four of the six non-employee members of the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors voted to approve the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger.
In determining that the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is
advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland
Holdings and the Hiland Holdings public unitholders and
approving the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the Hiland Holdings
merger, and recommending that the Hiland Holdings public
unitholders vote for the approval of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger, the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors considered a number of factors, including the
following material factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the unanimous determination and recommendation of the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee;
|
|
|
|
the opinion of Barclays Capital delivered orally at the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee meeting and presented at the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors meeting on June 1, 2009, and
subsequently confirmed in writing, that as of the date of the
opinion, based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions
set forth in the opinion, the Hiland Holdings merger
consideration of $2.40 per common unit to be offered to the
holders of common units of Hiland Holdings (other than the
Hiland Holdings rollover common unitholders) pursuant to the
Hiland Holdings merger was fair, from a financial point of view,
to the Hiland Holdings public unitholders, as described in the
opinion of Barclays Capital;
|
|
|
|
the financial presentation of Barclays in connection with the
foregoing opinion that was presented to the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors at the request of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Hiland Holdings merger consideration and the
other terms of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement resulted
from negotiations between the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee and Mr. Hamm, and the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors belief that $2.40 in cash for each Hiland
Holdings common unit represented the highest per common unit
consideration that could be negotiated; and
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
The factors considered by the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee, including the positive factors and potential benefits
of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, the risks and
potentially negative factors relating to the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement, and the factors relating to procedural
safeguards, each as described in The Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee above.
|
In doing so, the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors expressly
adopted the analysis of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee,
which is discussed above.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors includes
the material factors considered by the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors. In view of the variety of factors considered in
connection with its evaluation of the Hiland Holdings merger,
the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors did not find it
practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign
relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching
its determination and recommendation. In addition, individual
directors may have given different weights to different factors.
The Hiland Holdings Board of Directors approved and recommends
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
merger based upon the totality of the information presented to
and considered by it.
The Hiland Holdings Board of Directors did not consider
liquidation value in determining the fairness of the Hiland
Holdings merger to the Hiland Holdings public unitholders
because of its belief, after considering the factors considered
by the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, that liquidation
value does not present a meaningful valuation for Hiland
Holdings and its business as Hiland Holdings value is
derived from the cash flows generated from its continuing
operations rather than from the value of assets that might be
realized in a liquidation.
The Hiland Holdings Board of Directors also did not consider net
book value in determining the fairness of the merger to the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders because of its belief, after
considering the factors considered by the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee, that net book value does not present a
meaningful valuation metric for Hiland Holdings and its business
as Hiland Holdings value is derived from the cash flows
generated from its continuing operations.
The Hiland Holdings Board of Directors believes that the Hiland
Holdings merger is procedurally fair because (1) of the
independence, absence of conflicts of interest and role and
actions of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee members
(permitting them to represent effectively the interests of the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders), (2) of the approval of
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement by a majority of the
directors who are not employees of Hiland Holdings and
(3) the terms of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
require the approval of a majority of the publicly-held Hiland
Holdings common units. The Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
believes that each of these procedural safeguards supports its
decision and provides assurance of the fairness of the Hiland
Holdings merger to the Hiland Holdings public unitholders.
Opinion
of Financial Advisor of Hiland Holdings
The general partner of Hiland Holdings engaged Barclays Capital
to act as financial advisor to the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee with respect to the proposed Hiland Holdings merger
between HPGP Merger Sub and Hiland Holdings on February 17,
2009. At the request of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee,
Barclays Capital prepared and updated several presentations to
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee over the course of its
engagement. On June 1, 2009, Barclays Capital rendered its
oral opinion (which was subsequently confirmed in writing) to
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee that, as of such date
and based upon and subject to the qualifications, limitations
and assumptions stated in its opinion, the consideration to be
offered to the unitholders of Hiland Holdings, other than
Mr. Hamm, Continental Gas and the Hamm family trusts, is
fair, from a financial point of view, to such unitholders.
The full text of Barclays Capitals written opinion,
dated as of June 1, 2009, is attached as Annex F to
this joint proxy statement. Barclays Capitals written
opinion sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made,
procedures followed, factors considered and limitations upon the
review undertaken by Barclays Capital in rendering its opinion.
You are encouraged to read the opinion carefully in its
entirety. The following is a summary of Barclays Capitals
opinion and the methodology that Barclays
74
used to render its opinion. This summary is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.
Barclays Capitals opinion, the issuance of which was
approved by Barclays Capitals Fairness Opinion Committee,
is addressed to the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee,
addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the consideration to be received by the unitholders of Hiland
Holdings, other than the Hamm Continuing Investors, and does not
constitute a recommendation to any unitholder of Hiland Holdings
as to how such unitholder should vote with respect to the
proposed transaction or any other matter. The terms of the
proposed transaction were determined through arms-length
negotiations between the general partner of Hiland Holdings and
Parent and were unanimously approved by the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors, with Messrs. Hamm and Reid abstaining.
Barclays Capital did not recommend any specific form of
consideration to the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee or the
general partner of Hiland Holdings or that any specific form of
consideration constituted the only appropriate consideration for
the proposed transaction. Barclays Capital was not requested to
address, and its opinion does not in any manner address, Hiland
Holdings underlying business decision (i) to proceed
with or effect the proposed transaction or (ii) with
respect to the timing of entering into or consummating the
proposed transaction. Further, Barclays was not requested to
opine as to, and its opinion does not in any manner address, the
Hiland Partners merger. In addition, Barclays Capital expressed
no opinion on, and its opinion does not in any manner address,
the fairness of the amount or the nature of any compensation to
any officers, directors or employees of any parties to the
proposed transaction, or any class of such persons, relative to
the consideration to be offered to the unitholders of Hiland
Holdings other than the Hamm Continuing Investors in the
proposed transaction. No limitations were imposed by the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee upon Barclays Capital with respect
to the investigations made or procedures followed by it in
rendering its opinion.
Barclays Capital understands, based on discussions with the
management of Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners, that Hiland
Holdings derives all of its cash flows from its ownership of
(i) common units and subordinated units in Hiland Partners,
(ii) the general partner interest in Hiland Partners, and
(iii) the associated incentive distribution rights, and as
such, Barclays Capitals analysis involved, in part, a
review of Hiland Partners financial and operating
information provided by the management of Hiland Partners.
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays Capital, among other
things, reviewed and analyzed:
|
|
|
|
|
a draft of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, dated as of
May 22, 2009, and the specific terms of the Hiland Holdings
merger;
|
|
|
|
publicly available information concerning Hiland Holdings and
Hiland Partners that Barclays Capital believed to be relevant to
its analysis, including Hiland Holdings and Hiland
Partners Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009;
|
|
|
|
financial and operating information with respect to the
business, operations and prospects of Hiland Partners, furnished
by the management of Hiland Partners, including financial
projections prepared by the management of Hiland Partners (the
Hiland Projections);
|
|
|
|
financial and operating information with respect to the
business, operations and prospects of Hiland Holdings, furnished
by the management of Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners,
including financial projections prepared by the management of
Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners (the Holdings
Projections);
|
|
|
|
the trading histories of common units of Hiland Holdings and the
common units of Hiland Partners from May 28, 2008 to
May 28, 2009 and a comparison of those trading histories
with those of other companies and publicly traded partnerships
that Barclays Capital deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
a comparison of the historical financial results and present
financial condition of Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners with
those of other companies and publicly traded partnerships that
Barclays Capital deemed relevant;
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
a comparison of the financial terms of the Hiland Holdings
merger with the financial terms of certain other transactions
that Barclays Capital deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
the impact of varying commodity price and volume scenarios on
Hiland Partners operating and financial prospects,
including (i) assumptions used by Hiland Partners
management, with commodity prices as quoted on the NYMEX on
May 28, 2009 and (ii) selected commodity price and
volume sensitivity cases, in both cases analyzing the resultant
impact on Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners;
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners current liquidity position and its ability
to meet its cash requirements, financial obligations and
covenants contained in the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the limited business and strategic alternatives available to
Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners, taking into consideration
the challenging conditions for natural gas gathering and
processing companies;
|
|
|
|
the limited financing or re-financing alternatives available to
Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners, the result of which may
lead to the insolvency of Hiland Holdings
and/or
Hiland Partners;
|
|
|
|
the impact of Hiland Partners decision to suspend
indefinitely its quarterly cash distributions, thereby reducing
Hiland Holdings cash inflows to zero and resulting in
arrearages which require Hiland Partners to first pay cumulative
arrearage amounts to its common unitholders (including Hiland
Holdings) before any cash distributions may be paid to Hiland
Holdings with regard to its subordinated units or incentive
distribution rights; and
|
|
|
|
the impact of Hiland Holdings decision to suspend
indefinitely its quarterly cash distributions.
|
Barclays Capital had discussions with the management of Hiland
Holdings and Hiland Partners concerning their respective
businesses, operations, assets, liabilities, financial condition
and prospects and has undertaken such other studies, analyses
and investigations as deemed appropriate.
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays Capital assumed and relied
upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other
information used by Barclays Capital without any independent
verification of such information. Barclays Capital also relied
upon the assurances of management of Hiland Partners that they
were not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make
such information inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the
financial projections of Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners,
upon advice of Hiland Partners, Barclays Capital assumed that
such projections were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting
the best currently available estimates and judgments of the
management of Hiland Partners as to Hiland Partners and
Hiland Holdings future financial performance and that
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings would perform substantially
in accordance with such projections. In arriving at its opinion,
Barclays Capital assumed no responsibility for and expressed no
view as to any such projections or estimates or the assumptions
on which they were based. In arriving at its opinion, Barclays
Capital did not conduct a physical inspection of the properties
and facilities of Hiland Partners and did not make or obtain any
evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities of Hiland
Holdings and Hiland Partners. In addition, Barclays Capital was
not authorized by Hiland Holdings to solicit, and did not
solicit, any indications of interest from any third party with
respect to the purchase of all or a part of Hiland Holdings, or
Hiland Partners business. Barclays Capitals opinion
was necessarily based upon market, economic and other conditions
as they existed on, and could be evaluated as of, June 1,
2009. Barclays Capital assumed no responsibility for updating or
revising its opinion based on events or circumstances that may
have occurred after June 1, 2009.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Barclays Capital
performed certain financial, comparative and other analyses as
summarized below. In arriving at its opinion, Barclays Capital
did not ascribe a specific range of values to the Hiland
Holdings units but rather made its determination as to fairness,
from a financial point of view, to Hiland Holdings
unitholders other than the Hamm Continuing Investors of the
consideration to be offered to such unitholders in the proposed
transaction on the basis of various financial and comparative
analyses. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex
process and involves various determinations as to the most
appropriate and relevant methods of financial and comparative
analyses and the application of those methods to the particular
circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily
susceptible to summary description.
76
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays Capital did not attribute
any particular weight to any single analysis or factor
considered by it but rather made qualitative judgments as to the
significance and relevance of each analysis and factor relative
to all other analyses and factors performed and considered by it
and in the context of the circumstances of the particular
transaction. Accordingly, Barclays Capital believes that its
analyses must be considered as a whole, as considering any
portion of such analyses and factors, without considering all
analyses and factors as a whole, could create a misleading or
incomplete view of the process underlying its opinion.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
used by Barclays Capital in preparing its opinion to the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee. Certain financial analyses
summarized below include information presented in tabular
format. In order to fully understand the financial analyses used
by Barclays Capital, the tables must be read together with the
text of each summary, as the tables alone do not constitute a
complete description of the financial analyses. In performing
its analyses, Barclays Capital made numerous assumptions with
respect to industry performance, general business and economic
conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the
control of Hiland Holdings or any other parties to the proposed
transaction. None of Hiland Partners, Hiland Holdings, Barclays
Capital or any other person assumes responsibility if future
results are materially different from those discussed. Any
estimates contained in these analyses are not necessarily
indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or
values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than
as set forth below. In addition, analyses relating to the value
of the businesses do not purport to be appraisals or reflect the
prices at which the businesses may actually be sold.
Strategic
Alternatives Analysis
As of June 1, 2009, according to the management of Hiland
Partners, Hiland Partners was likely to be in breach of the
leverage ratio covenant under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement as early as June 30, 2009. Due to these
circumstances, Barclays Capital considered and evaluated various
strategic alternatives with the goal of determining certain
scenarios under which Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings could
continue to operate their respective businesses as going concern
entities. Generally, Barclays Capital looked at strategic
alternatives regarding (i) debt, (ii) equity and
(iii) mergers and acquisitions. Below is a more detailed
explanation of each alternative considered.
Debt
Related Alternatives
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Facility Amendment/Waiver A
credit facility amendment or covenant waiver represented the
only likely actionable and possibly achievable debt-related
alternative. Barclays Capital noted, based on current market
conditions and precedent, that any amendment/waiver for Hiland
Partners would likely require elimination of all distributions
and reduced growth capital expenditures until such time as
Hiland Partners returned to compliance. Barclays Capital also
assumed that any amendment would likely require increased
interest pricing and an upfront fee. Barclays Capital was aware
that Mr. Hamm was in direct negotiations with the Hiland
Partners lenders and had learned through his discussions that an
amendment would require a substantial equity contribution from
Mr. Hamm and increased pricing in exchange for covenant
relief. While Hiland Partners management had not held similar
negotiations with the bank group, Barclays Capital noted that in
conversations with Hiland Partners management, it understood a
similar amendment could be reached, but with far more onerous
terms, particularly due to the absence of any equity injection.
Barclays Capital assumed that executing an amendment to the
existing Hiland Partners credit facility was one alternative
available to Hiland Partners, and accordingly Barclays Capital
developed a set of projections that reflected this alternative
(described in more detail later in this section). While, as of
June 1, 2009, the management of Hiland Partners expected
Hiland Partners to violate its leverage ratio covenant as early
as June 30, 2009, Barclays Capital noted that upon signing
of the merger agreements, Mr. Hamm assumed any default risk
under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
|
|
|
|
New Bank Credit Facility Entering into a new
credit facility would have posed several challenges to Hiland
Partners. First, the market conditions at the time were very
challenging. Attracting a sufficient lender group would likely
not have been possible. Even in the case where Hiland Partners
could have
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
accessed the market, the cost would have been extremely
expensive, both in terms of interest cost and upfront fees.
Given overall credit market conditions and the particulars
around Hiland Partners and the state of its industry, Barclays
Capital believed executing a new credit agreement would not have
been a viable option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Yield Bond Issuance A high-yield bond
issuance could have potentially represented a way for Hiland
Partners to access capital with less restrictive covenants than
those contained in the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
However, because of Hiland Partners financial condition,
Barclays Capital felt that Hiland Partners would not have had
access to this market. Furthermore, the incurrence of additional
debt at Hiland Partners would have required an amendment to the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine Financing The mezzanine market,
while similar in many respects to the high-yield market, is
characterized by higher interest costs and restrictions on total
transaction size. The market restrictions around total size
would not have afforded Hiland Partners with enough proceeds to
retire its existing credit facility. Like the high yield bond
issuance, this alternative would have also required an amendment
to the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. Considering all of
these factors, Barclays Capital believed that mezzanine
financing was not a viable alternative for Hiland Partners.
|
|
|
|
Debt-for-Equity
Exchange A
debt-for-equity
exchange would have represented a de-levering transaction for
Hiland Partners, as lenders would swap out debt for equity in
Hiland Partners. Given the required amount of debt relief and
current market capitalization of Hiland Partners, any
debt-for-equity
transaction would have resulted in significant dilution to
current Hiland Partners unitholders. Furthermore, Barclays
Capital believed that given the uncertainty around Hiland
Partners and its industry, the lenders under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement would have no interest in owning
Hiland Partners equity. Barclays Capital also believed that this
option was not an appropriate alternative for Hiland Partners.
|
|
|
|
Direct Debt Paydown by Harold Hamm Barclays
Capital also examined a direct equity injection by Mr. Hamm
in order to retire a portion of the borrowings outstanding under
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. While this option would
have reduced leverage at no cost to Hiland Partners, the
corresponding returns to Mr. Hamm were negative and
Barclays Capital therefore did not believe that Mr. Hamm
would support this option.
|
Equity
Related Alternatives
Barclays Capital also examined certain equity related
alternatives for Hiland Partners. An important factor that
developed during the course of Barclays Capitals analyses
was Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings
announcement, on April 27, 2009, of the suspension of
distributions, beginning with the first quarter distribution of
2009. As a result, Hiland Partners will accrue arrearages on the
common units, such that no distributions on the subordinated
units or related to the incentive distribution rights are
permitted until such time as the common unit arrearages are
repaid in full.
|
|
|
|
|
Public Equity Issuance Barclays Capital
examined the potential for Hiland Partners to issue public
equity and use the proceeds to repay bank debt in an amount
sufficient to be in compliance with the covenants in the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement, given the then-current trading price
of Hiland Partners common units. The estimated amount of equity
required to retire enough debt to achieve compliance represented
nearly twice Hiland Partners market capitalization and a
substantial multiple of the public float. Given the required
offering size, such an issuance would have been extremely
dilutive to existing Hiland Partners unitholders. An equity
issuance of this size would have created a situation whereby
Hiland Partners would not have been able to make its MQD for
some time and therefore Hiland Partners would accrue significant
arrearages on the common units. This alternative was likely not
viable even prior to the suspension of distributions. Following
the suspension of distributions, this option was even less
viable.
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
Private Third-Party Investment Similar to a
public equity issuance, a private equity investment by a third
party could provide proceeds to repay a portion of the debt
outstanding under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement and
potentially provide covenant relief. However, given Hiland
Partners financial condition and outlook, Barclays Capital
believed that attracting a private equity investment would
likely not be possible given the significant returns required by
private equity investors. Any investment of this nature would
have also limited Hiland Partners ability to pay its MQD
by increasing the outstanding number of common units, and
therefore would not have been a viable alternative.
|
|
|
|
Structured Equity Investment by Harold Hamm
An additional alternative that Barclays Capital
analyzed involved a direct equity investment by Mr. Hamm.
Barclays Capital envisioned that this investment would be
structured with the goal of maintaining covenant compliance
while avoiding arrearages on the common units. This equity
security would receive distributions after Hiland Partners paid
the MQD on all common units and subordinated units, and in that
case, this security would receive 100% of the excess cash flow
above the MQD on all common units and subordinated units until
such time as the investment was repaid in full. Given the
contemplated structure, this security would have effectively
limited Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings
distributions to the MQD level for the foreseeable future.
Barclays Capital believed that this could have been a viable
alternative and accordingly developed a set of projections that
reflected this alternative (described in more detail later in
this section). Barclays Capital understands that Mr. Hamm
considered this alternative, but ultimately chose not to pursue
this alternative.
|
Mergers
and Acquisitions Alternatives
In addition to the proposed transaction with Mr. Hamm,
Barclays Capital evaluated several additional merger and
acquisition-related alternatives.
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of Entire Entity Barclays Capital
analyzed a combined sale of both Hiland Partners and Hiland
Holdings to third party acquirors. Barclays Capital analyzed
potential transaction economics to prospective buyers and
concluded that the implied economics did not support a
transaction at or near the levels offered by Mr. Hamm.
Additionally, at the time of his initial offer, Mr. Hamm
stated that he was interested only in acquiring common units in
the Hiland Companies and that he was not interested in selling
(or causing his affiliates to sell) interests in Hiland Holdings
or Hiland Partners, which would have likely deterred any
potential acquirors. Barclays Capital believed that this did not
represent a viable alternative.
|
|
|
|
Selected Asset Sales The market for asset
sales has been and continues to be extremely challenged. Buyers
of gathering and processing assets have limited access to
capital and those with access to capital are offering prices
well below historical averages. According to management, Hiland
Partners historical earnings are expected to be greater
than the projected earnings. Therefore, asset sales would likely
have had a dilutive effect on Hiland Partners credit
statistics as calculated under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement. Barclays Capital believed that this did not represent
a viable alternative.
|
|
|
|
Sale/Leaseback Transaction The nature of
Hiland Partners assets are not ideal for a sale/leaseback
structure. Additionally, the number of investors that typically
participate in transactions of this type has decreased
significantly over the past several months. Barclays Capital
believed that this did not represent a viable alternative.
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Hiland Holdings by Hiland Partners
A transaction whereby Hiland Partners would
purchase all of the outstanding units of Hiland Holdings may
have been possible, but such transaction would not have resolved
the impending issues related to potential covenant violations
under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. Barclays Capital
believed that this did not represent a viable alternative.
|
Additionally, in considering these various strategic
alternatives, Barclays Capital took into consideration:
(i) the likelihood of transaction consummation, including
cost and willingness of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings to
participate; (ii) the marketplace availability and timing
of each alternative, particularly in certain debt and equity
alternatives; (iii) counterparty availability, willingness,
and timing of each alternative,
79
particularly in the mergers and acquisitions alternatives;
(iv) the financial impact on Hiland Partners and Hiland
Holdings; and (v) whether the alternatives would be
sufficient to resolve Hiland Partners pending credit
facility issues. In its analysis, Barclays Capital also
considered the likelihood of Hiland Partners embarking on any
given alternative; while the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
holds no specific authorization to pursue any of the
alternatives, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and
Barclays Capital determined that it was important to evaluate
strategic alternatives which could potentially offer greater
value to Hiland Holdings public unitholders. After the
analysis and evaluation, Barclays Capital determined that the
following financial case alternatives were the only
alternatives which were reasonably available to Hiland Partners
(and thus Hiland Holdings).
Financial
Cases
|
|
|
|
|
Status Quo: This case was a hypothetical case
that assumed that Hiland Partners continued to operate its
business and make distributions without pursuing any strategic
alternatives. In order for this scenario to have been
applicable, industry conditions and Hiland Partners future
financial performance would have needed to improve dramatically
such that Hiland Partners would not have been in violation of
its credit facility covenants in the coming months.
Alternatively, this case would have also been applicable if
Hiland Partners existing bank group would have agreed to
waive covenant compliance for no fee or no increase in interest
cost, which Barclays Capital believed was not possible.
Accordingly, Barclays Capital only considered this case under
the upside operating scenario (as described below).
|
|
|
|
Renegotiate Credit Facility: In this scenario,
Barclays Capital assumed Hiland Partners could renegotiate the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement with its current bank group.
Barclays Capital assumed a 0.30 percentage point upfront
fee as well as an incremental 2.50 percentage point
increase in interest costs. This case only allowed distributions
to the extent that Hiland Partners was in compliance with its
credit facility covenants.
|
|
|
|
Private Investment: In this case, Barclays
Capital assumed that Mr. Hamm would invest
$125 million into Hiland Partners for the purpose of paying
down the debt outstanding under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement to a level that would achieve compliance with the
credit facility covenants. Barclays Capital assumed that this
private investment would be subordinated to both the existing
common units and subordinated units of Hiland Partners and would
only receive distributions in the event that Hiland Partners
paid a cash distribution above the MQD. All distributions above
the MQD would be for the benefit of this private security until
the cumulative distributions to the private security totaled
$125 million.
|
Operating
Scenarios
Based on discussions with Hiland Partners and Hiland
Holdings management, Barclays Capital analyzed three
different operational scenarios, as described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Management Case: Production volumes flat from
fourth quarter 2009 levels; projected NYMEX future pricing for
crude oil, natural gas and NGLs.
|
|
|
|
Upside Case: Production volume growth in 2010
and flat thereafter; NYMEX future pricing through the second
quarter of 2009; afterward, $80.00 per barrel of crude oil,
$8.00 per million British Thermal Units for natural gas and
12-month
historical NGLs to crude oil correlations for NGL prices.
|
|
|
|
Downside Case: Production decline in 2009 and
2010 with a moderate decline thereafter; NYMEX future pricing
for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs.
|
Cash distribution assumptions and growth capital expenditure
assumptions vary with each alternative based on the financial
cases described below and Hiland Partners ability to
remain in compliance with its covenants under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement.
80
Barclays
Capitals Summary Valuation Analysis
Hiland Holdings only assets are partnership interests in
Hiland Partners. Accordingly, Barclays Capitals valuation
of Hiland Holdings is highly dependent on the underlying
prospects and performance of Hiland Partners. The economic
assets owned by Hiland Holdings consist of: (i) 2,321,471
common units of Hiland Partners, (ii) 3,060,000
subordinated units of Hiland Partners, (iii) the 2% general
partner interest and (iv) the incentive distribution
rights. Given the organizational and ownership structure of
Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners, any valuation of Hiland
Holdings is highly dependent on the cash distributions received
by Hiland Holdings from Hiland Partners. In any scenario where
Hiland Partners reduces or suspends cash distributions, Hiland
Holdings will receive reduced or no cash distributions. Further
affecting the valuation is Hiland Holdings ownership of
both (i) the subordinated units of Hiland Partners, which
do not receive distributions until the MQD and all arrearages
have been paid to the common unitholders and (ii) the
incentive distribution rights, which do not receive cash
distributions unless the common unitholders are paid the MQD and
all arrearages, the subordinated units have been paid the MQD
and certain target distribution levels above the MQD are met.
When Hiland Partners distributions are lowered below the MQD
level, Hiland Holdings receives reduced cash distributions on
its common units and general partner interest, and no cash
distributions on the subordinated units and the incentive
distribution rights.
Following is a summary of per unit values for Hiland Holdings
based on Barclays Capitals different methodologies.
Additional description of the valuation methodologies used by
Barclays Capital can be found on the following pages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Methodolgy
|
|
Implied Equity Value/HPGP Unit
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upside Case: Renegotiate Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.95
|
|
Upside Case: Private Investment
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3.15
|
|
Upside Case: Status Quo
|
|
$
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3.86
|
|
Management Case: Private Investment
|
|
$
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
Downside Case: Private Investment
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
Comparable Company Analysis
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
Corporate & GP Holdco Transaction Analysis
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6.55
|
|
Net Asset Valuations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Transactions
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3.32
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
(1.90
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
In order to estimate the value of Hiland Holdings, Barclays
Capital performed discounted cash flow analyses on Hiland
Holdings assuming various operating scenarios and financial
cases. A discounted cash flow analysis is a traditional
valuation methodology used to derive a valuation of an asset by
calculating the present value of estimated future
cash flows of the asset. Present value refers to the
current value of future cash flows and is obtained by
discounting those future cash flows or amounts by a discount
rate that takes into account macroeconomic assumptions and
estimates of risk, the opportunity cost of capital, expected
returns and other appropriate factors.
The discounted cash flow analysis was performed on the cash
flows expected to be received by equity holders of Hiland
Holdings and thus is necessarily based upon distributions
received from Hiland Partners. In scenarios where Hiland
Partners is unable to pay distributions, performing a discounted
cash flow analysis on Hiland Holdings is not possible. In the
management and downside operating scenarios under the
Renegotiate Credit Facility case, Barclays Capital assumed that
given the high leverage, the lenders would not allow Hiland
Partners to pay distributions until such time as Hiland Partners
was in compliance with its credit facility covenants. Without
Hiland Partners distributions, there can be no distributions at
Hiland Holdings,
81
rendering an equity valuation not possible. Therefore, Barclays
Capital excluded these two scenarios from the summary valuation.
The discounted cash flow analyses were performed using a
sum-of-the-parts
approach. Hiland Holdings has four separate cash flow streams:
(i) cash distributions on its Hiland Partners common units;
(ii) cash distributions on its subordinated units;
(iii) cash distributions on the general partner interest
and incentive distribution rights; and (iv) general and
administrative (G&A) expenses at the Hiland
Holdings level.
Barclays Capital performed a discounted cash flow analysis of
the projected equity cash flow distributions of Hiland Holdings
for the five fiscal years beginning January 1, 2009 and
ending December 31, 2013. Barclays Capital used the
following discount rates as an estimate of the cost of equity:
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units: 17.5% - 22.5%
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Units: 20.0% - 25.0%
|
|
|
|
GP Cash flows (including both the 2% general partner interest,
the incentive distribution rights and G&A Expenses): 25.0%
- 30.0%
|
In calculating the terminal values, Barclays Capital used a
perpetuity of projected equity cash flows and assumed growth
rates of: (i) 0.0% - 1.0% for the common units and
subordinated units; (ii) 0.0% - 2.0% for the G&A cash
flows; and (iii) 0.0% - 5.0% for the GP cash flows. The
growth rates for the projected equity cash flows beyond 2013
were based on estimated growth rates for Hiland Partners.
The table below shows the resulting valuations based on
discounted cash flow analyses of equity distributions at Hiland
Holdings. Barclays Capital noted that on the basis of the
discounted cash flow analysis, the transaction consideration of
$2.40 per unit was within the implied value ranges per unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
(Equity Value/Hiland Holdings Unit)
|
|
|
Upside Case:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renegotiate Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.95
|
|
Private Investment
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3.15
|
|
Status Quo
|
|
$
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3.86
|
|
Management Case:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Investment
|
|
$
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
Downside Case:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Investment
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
Publicly-Derived
Valuations
In addition to the discounted cash flow analyses, Barclays
Capital also performed valuations based upon observations
regarding (i) comparable publicly traded MLPs and
comparable publicly traded general partner holding companies
(GP Holdcos) and (ii) comparable transactions
involving publicly traded MLPs and publicly traded GP Holdcos.
Selected
Comparable Company Analysis
Barclays Capital reviewed and compared specific financial and
operating data relating to Hiland Holdings with selected
companies that Barclays Capital, based on its experience in the
midstream segment of the energy industry, deemed comparable to
Hiland Holdings. The selected comparable companies (divided into
Selected GP Holdcos and Selected MLPs)
were:
Selected
GP Holdcos
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance Holdings GP, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Atlas Pipeline Holdings, L.P.
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
|
|
|
|
Crosstex Energy Inc.
|
|
|
|
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.
|
|
|
|
Inergy Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
|
NuStar GP Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
Penn Virginia GP Holdings, L.P.
|
Selected
MLPs
|
|
|
|
|
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Copano Energy, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
Crosstex Energy, L.P.
|
|
|
|
DCP Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Regency Energy Partners LP
|
|
|
|
Targa Resources Partners LP
|
|
|
|
Williams Partners L.P.
|
The Selected GP Holdcos were selected by Barclays Capital
because they are publicly traded general partners which for the
purposes of analysis may be considered similar to Hiland
Holdings due to corporate structure and broadly, due to the
nature of the business of the underlying MLP. The Selected MLPs
were selected because they are publicly traded partnerships with
operations which for the purposes of analysis may be considered
similar to those of Hiland Partners. However, because of the
inherent differences between the business, operations and
prospects of Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners and those of
the selected comparable companies, Barclays Capital
believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did not,
rely solely on the quantitative results of the selected
comparable company analysis. Accordingly, Barclays Capital also
made qualitative judgments concerning differences between the
business, financial and operating characteristics and prospects
of Hiland Holdings, Hiland Partners and the selected comparable
companies that could affect the public trading values of each in
order to provide a context in which to consider the results of
the quantitative analysis. Barclays Capital calculated various
multiples for the Selected GP Holdcos and used the multiples as
a reference point to develop an indicative valuation for the 2%
general partner interest and incentive distribution rights owned
by Hiland Holdings. Given the suspension of distributions,
utilizing distributable cash flow estimates results in a more
meaningful result. For the Selected GP Holdcos, Barclays Capital
utilized a range of distributable cash flow multiples (DCF
Multiples), the estimates for which were based on publicly
available Wall Street equity research. In determining
appropriate DCF Multiples for the 2% general partner interest
incentive distribution rights, Barclays Capital calculated the
implied value of the general partner interest of each Selected
GP Holdco by first calculating the total enterprise value of
each Selected GP Holdco, then subtracting the value of any
limited partner interests owned by the Selected GP Holdco as
well as any other business assets not specifically related to
the general partner interest and incentive distribution rights
of the underlying MLP. Barclays Capital used its judgment in
determining which Selected GP Holdcos were most comparable to
Hiland Holdings in terms of business mix and subsector
participation. Currently, several of the Selected GP Holdcos are
considered to be in financial distress. Barclays Capital
analyzed the Selected GP Holdcos on an after-G&A basis,
then valued Hiland Holdings negative G&A cash flow
stream using the same multiple range. In determining appropriate
DCF Multiples for the limited partner
83
interest owned by Hiland Holdings, Barclays Capital analyzed the
distributable cash flow yields of the Selected MLPs, again using
its judgment in determining the most comparable companies to
Hiland Partners.
The results of this selected comparable company analysis are
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected GP Companies
Statistics and Multiples
|
|
Implied GP Value as Multiple of:
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2009E Distributable Cash Flow (After-G&A)
|
|
|
10.8
|
x
|
|
|
10.7
|
x
|
|
|
23.4
|
x
|
|
|
3.0x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected MLP Companies
Statistics and Multiples
|
|
Distributable Cash Flow Yield:
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2009E Distributable Cash Flow
|
|
|
16.08
|
%
|
|
|
25.39
|
%
|
|
|
64.69
|
%
|
|
|
12.23
|
%
|
Barclays Capital noted that on the basis of the selected
comparable company analysis, the transaction consideration of
$2.40 per unit was above the range of implied values of $0.51 to
$1.04 per unit.
Selected
Comparable Transaction Analysis
Barclays Capital reviewed and compared the purchase prices and
financial multiples paid in selected other transactions that
Barclays Capital, based on its experience with merger and
acquisition transactions, deemed relevant. These transactions
principally involved publicly traded MLPs and GP Holdcos.
Barclays Capital chose such transactions based on, among other
things, the similarity of the applicable target companies in the
transactions to Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners primarily
with respect to nature of business and corporate structure.
The reasons for and the circumstances surrounding each of the
selected precedent transactions analyzed were diverse, and there
are inherent differences in the business, operations, financial
conditions and prospects of Hiland Holdings and Hiland Partners
and the companies included in the selected precedent transaction
analysis. Accordingly, Barclays Capital believed that a purely
quantitative selected precedent transaction analysis would not
be particularly meaningful in the context of considering the
proposed transaction. Barclays Capital therefore made
qualitative judgments concerning differences between the
characteristics of the selected precedent transactions and the
proposed transaction which would affect the acquisition values
of the selected target companies and Hiland Holdings. In
particular, Barclays Capital noted that the majority of the
precedent transactions were consummated in different capital
market and industry conditions than at present. In deriving the
comparable transaction valuation, Barclays Capital first valued
Hiland Partners as a whole and then calculated the portion of
that value attributable to Hiland Holdings limited partner
interest in Hiland Partners. Barclays Capital then valued the 2%
general partner interest and incentive distribution rights in
Hiland Partners owned by Hiland Holdings, and added that value
to the limited partner interest to derive a total value for
Hiland Holdings.
Barclays Capital examined the following publicly traded MLP
transactions and GP Holdco transactions:
Publicly
Traded MLP Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P./Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Valero L.P./Kaneb Pipe Line Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Products Partners L.P./GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P./Santa Fe Pacific
Pipeline Partners, L.P.
|
GP
Holdco Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
Occidental Petroleum Corporation/Plains All American GP LLC
|
|
|
|
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P./MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. &
10.3% Interest in MWE GP
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
GE Energy Financial Services/Regency GP LP
|
|
|
|
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P./Texas Eastern Products Pipeline
Company, LLC
|
|
|
|
ArcLight Capital Partners, Kelso & Company and Lehman
Brothers/Buckeye GP Holdings
|
|
|
|
Suburban Propane Partners, L.P./Suburban Energy Services Group
LLC
|
|
|
|
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P./Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
ONEOK, Inc./TransCanadas GP Interest in Northern Border
Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
EPCO, Inc./Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC
|
|
|
|
EPCO, Inc./Enterprise Products GP LLC
|
|
|
|
Valero L.P./Kaneb Services LLC
|
|
|
|
LB Pacific, L.P./Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
ONEOK, Inc./Northern Plains
|
|
|
|
Carlyle/Riverstone/Glenmoor, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
First Reserve, Corbin Robertson and Mgmt./Arch Coal, Inc.s
G.P. Interest in Natural Resource Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Products Partners L.P./GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Vulcan Capital/Plains Resources Inc.
|
|
|
|
Energy Transfer Company/U.S. Propane L.P.
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs/GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Madison Dearborn and Riverstone/Williams Energy Partners L.P.
|
Barclays Capital noted that there were no recent publicly traded
MLP transactions or GP Holdco transactions. Given the depressed
market environment, Barclays Capital believed that the implied
multiples associated with these transactions were not achievable
at the time of its analysis. Accordingly, Barclays Capital
applied a discount intended to reflect the potential of a
distressed sale of Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings in
todays environment. Barclays Capital estimated this
discount to be 35% - 50%, and applied this to the derived per
unit valuation to establish the low end of the valuation range.
These discounts were derived by examining recent asset sales in
the market and the corresponding percentage decline in those
multiples relative to the multiples received in a more
normalized market environment.
Selected
MLP Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of:
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2009E EBITDA
|
|
14.4x
|
|
14.7x
|
|
15.0x
|
|
12.7x
|
Selected
MLP Transactions (35% Discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of:
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2009E EBITDA
|
|
9.4x
|
|
9.6x
|
|
9.8x
|
|
8.3x
|
Selected
GP Holdco Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of:
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2009E Distributable Cash Flow (After G&A)
|
|
12.4x
|
|
24.4x
|
|
145.7x
|
|
6.5x
|
85
Barclays Capital noted that on the basis of the selected
precedent transaction analysis, the transaction consideration of
$2.40 per Hiland Holdings unit was within the range of implied
values of $2.16 to $6.55 per unit.
Net
Asset Valuation
Because of the significant disruption in the capital markets and
the challenging environment for gathering and processing MLPs,
Barclays Capital performed a net asset valuation of Hiland
Partners and Hiland Holdings in order to derive a valuation
based on the underlying business that is not dependent on cash
distributions being paid. The net asset valuation consisted of
two main components: (i) comparable gathering and
processing asset transactions and (ii) a discounted cash
flow analysis on the unlevered cash flows generated by Hiland
Partners assets.
Comparable
Asset Transactions Analysis
Barclays reviewed and compared the purchase prices and financial
multiples paid in selected other asset transactions that
Barclays, based on its experience with merger and acquisition
transactions, deemed relevant. Barclays chose such transactions
based on, among other things, the similarity of the applicable
target assets in the transactions to Hiland Holdings and Hiland
Partners primarily with respect to nature of business. Below are
the asset transactions Barclays reviewed:
|
|
|
|
|
Spectra Energy Partners, LP/Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P./Millennium Midstream Partners,
L.P.
|
|
|
|
Regency Energy Partners LP/Nexus Gas Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
Targa Resources Partners LP/Targa Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Copano Energy, L.L.C./Cantera Natural Gas, LLC
|
|
|
|
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P./Canyon Gas Resources, LLC
|
|
|
|
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P./Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
|
|
|
|
Momentum Energy Group, Inc./DCP Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P./Laser Midstream Energy, LP
|
|
|
|
Regency Energy Partners LP/TexStar Field Services, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Products Partners L.P./Lewis Energy Group, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Crosstex Energy, L.P./Chief Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners, LP/Enogex Gas Gathering, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
Southern Union Company/Sid Richardson Energy Services Co.
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P./ONEOK Texas Field Services L.P.
|
|
|
|
Crosstex Energy, L.P./El Paso Corporation
|
|
|
|
Targa Resources Partners LP/Dynegy Midstream Services L.P.
|
|
|
|
Copano Energy, L.L.C./ScissorTail Energy, LLC
|
|
|
|
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P./Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|
The reasons for and the circumstances surrounding each of the
selected precedent transactions analyzed were diverse and there
are inherent differences in the business, operations, financial
conditions and prospects of Hiland Holdings and the companies
included in the selected precedent transaction analysis.
Accordingly, Barclays believed that a purely quantitative
selected precedent transaction analysis would not be
particularly meaningful in the context of considering the
proposed transaction. Barclays therefore made qualitative
86
judgments concerning differences between the characteristics of
the selected precedent transactions and the proposed transaction
which would affect the acquisition values of the selected target
companies and Hiland Holdings. In particular, Barclays noted
that the majority of the precedent transactions were consummated
in different capital market and industry conditions than at
present.
After arriving at an equity valuation range for Hiland Partners,
Barclays then calculated the proportion of this value range
attributable to the limited partners and the general partner
based on distributable cash flow attributable to the limited
partners and general partner of Hiland Partners. Barclays then
calculated the implied value of Hiland Holdings. Barclays then
subtracted the value of the general and administrative expenses
and the net debt at Hiland Holdings to derive an equity
valuation range for Hiland Holdings.
Selected
Asset Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of:
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2009E EBITDA
|
|
9.0x
|
|
9.8x
|
|
15.4x
|
|
6.0x
|
Barclays noted that on the basis of the selected comparable
asset transactions analysis, the transaction consideration of
$2.40 per unit was within the range of implied values of $0.89
to $3.32 per unit.
Asset
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Barclays also performed an asset-based discounted cash flow
analysis on Hiland Partners using the Management Case
projections. This discounted cash flow analysis was performed on
the unlevered cash flows generated by Hiland Partners
assets for the five fiscal years beginning January 1, 2009
and ending December 31, 2013. Barclays used discount rates
of 12% to 16% as an estimate of the weighted average cost of
capital.
In calculating the terminal values, Barclays used a perpetuity
of projected unlevered free cash flows and assumed growth rates
of 1% to 3%. The growth rates for the projected unlevered free
cash flows beyond 2013 were based on estimated growth rates for
Hiland Partners assets.
After arriving at an equity valuation range for Hiland Partners,
Barclays then calculated the proportion of this value range
attributable to the limited partners and the general partner
based on distributable cash flow attributable to the limited
partners and general partner of Hiland Partners. Barclays then
calculated the implied value of Hiland Holdings. Barclays then
subtracted the value of the general and administrative expenses
and the net debt at Hiland Holdings to derive an equity
valuation range for Hiland Holdings.
Valuation
Analysis Discounted Cash Flow Sensitivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Case
|
|
|
Enterprise Value Hiland Partners
|
|
$
|
215.0
|
|
|
$
|
370.0
|
|
Net Debt
|
|
|
265.2
|
|
|
|
265.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Value Hiland Partners
|
|
$
|
(50.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
104.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Equity Value of Hiland Holdings
|
|
$
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Barclays noted that on the basis of the discounted cash flow
analysis, the transaction consideration of $2.40 per unit was
above the range of implied values of ($1.90) to $2.31 per unit.
General
Barclays is an internationally recognized investment banking
firm and, as part of its investment banking activities, is
regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
investments for passive and control purposes, negotiated
underwritings, competitive bids, secondary distributions of
listed and unlisted securities, private placements and
valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes. The Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee selected Barclays because of its
familiarity with
87
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings and its qualifications,
reputation and experience in the valuation of businesses and
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions
generally, as well as substantial experience in transactions
comparable to the proposed transaction.
Barclays is acting as financial advisor to the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee in connection with the proposed transaction.
As compensation for its services in connection with the proposed
transaction, Hiland Holdings paid Barclays a fee of $250,000
upon execution of Barclays engagement letter with Hiland
Holdings and $1,000,000 upon the delivery of Barclays
opinion. At the sole and absolute discretion of the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee, Hiland Holdings may pay Barclays a
limited discretionary fee of $250,000 (in cash) based on the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees evaluation of the
quality and quantity of the work performed. Hiland Holdings has
agreed to reimburse Barclays for certain of its expenses and to
indemnify Barclays for certain liabilities that may arise out of
its engagement. Barclays has performed various investment
banking and financial services for Hiland Partners, Hiland
Holdings, their affiliates and Parent in the past, and may
expect to perform such services in the future, and has received,
and expects to receive, customary fees for such services.
However, in the past two years, Barclays has performed only
limited services for Hiland Partners, Hiland Holdings and their
affiliates, for which Barclays received no compensation.
Barclays is a full service securities firm engaged in a wide
range of businesses from investment and commercial banking,
lending, asset management and other financial and non-financial
services. In the ordinary course of its business, Barclays and
affiliates may actively trade and effect transactions in the
equity, debt
and/or other
securities (and any derivatives thereof) and financial
instruments (including loans and other obligations) of Hiland
Partners, Hiland Holdings and their affiliates for its own
account and for the accounts of its customers and, accordingly,
may at any time hold long or short positions and investments in
such securities and financial instruments.
Copies of the presentation materials presented by Barclays to
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee in connection with the
delivery of its opinion have been filed with the SEC as exhibits
to the
Schedule 13E-3
filed by Hiland Holdings.
Position
of HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons as to the Fairness of the Hiland Holdings
Merger
Under SEC rules, Parent, HPGP Merger Sub, Continental Gas and
Messrs. Hamm, Griffin and Harrison (collectively the
HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons) are required to provide certain
information regarding their position as to the substantive and
procedural fairness of the Hiland Holdings merger to the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders. The HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons are making the statements included in this
section solely for purposes of complying with such requirements.
The HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons views as to the fairness of the Hiland
Holdings merger should not be construed as a recommendation to
any unitholder as to how that unitholder should vote on the
proposals to approve the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and
the Hiland Holdings merger.
The HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons, other than Messrs. Griffin and Harrison,
did not participate in the deliberations of the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors or the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
regarding, and did not receive advice from the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committees legal or financial advisors as to,
the fairness of the Hiland Holdings merger. Mr. Hamm
engaged Wachovia Securities as his financial advisor to provide
certain financial advisory services with respect to a potential
acquisition by Mr. Hamm and/or certain of his affiliates of
the assets or the capital stock of the Hiland Companies.
Wachovia Securities did not provide an opinion with respect to
the fairness of the Hiland Holdings merger or the Hiland
Holdings merger consideration.
The discussion below of the information and factors considered
by the HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes
the material factors considered by the HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons. In view of the variety of factors considered in
connection with their evaluation of the fairness of Hiland
Holdings merger, the HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons did not find it practicable to, and did not,
quantify or otherwise assign specific weights to the factors
considered in reaching their determination. In addition, each of
the HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons may have given differing weights to different
factors. On balance, the HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons believed that the positive factors
88
discussed above outweighed the negative factors discussed above
and arrived at the conclusion that the Hiland Holdings merger
was fair to the Hiland Holdings public unitholders.
The HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons, other than Messrs. Griffin and Harrison,
believe that the Hiland Holdings merger consideration is
substantively fair to the Hiland Holdings public unitholders
based on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
The HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons view that if the adverse impact of
commodity prices on gathering and processing fundamentals and
the challenges presented by the global economic crisis persist,
Hiland Partners, and consequently Hiland Holdings, will
experience a meaningful decrease in future distributable cash
flow and will need substantial new equity capital to remain in
continued compliance with the financial covenants under the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. Obtaining such equity capital
in the current environment on acceptable terms does not appear
feasible and would be significantly dilutive to current
unitholders, including Hiland Holdings.
|
|
|
|
The consideration proposed to be paid to the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders represents a 49% premium over the reported
closing sale price of $1.61 per common unit of Hiland Holdings
on May 29, 2009, the last trading day prior to the
execution of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and a 35%
premium over the average closing sale price of $1.78 per common
unit of Hiland Holdings over the
30-day
period ending May 29, 2009.
|
|
|
|
The consideration to be paid to the Hiland Holdings public
unitholders in the Hiland Holdings merger is all cash, thus
eliminating any uncertainty in valuing the consideration to be
received by such unitholders.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings merger will provide liquidity for the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders without incurring brokerage and
other costs typically associated with market sales.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings merger agreement allows the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee to withdraw or change its recommendation of
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, and to terminate the
merger agreement in certain circumstances.
|
|
|
|
The obligations of Parent and HPGP Merger Sub to consummate the
Hiland Holdings merger are not subject to any financing
condition. Mr. Hamm has delivered to Parent the Hiland
Holdings commitment letter, pursuant to which Mr. Hamm has
committed to contribute an aggregate of approximately
$21.2 million in cash to Parent, representing the Hiland
Holdings merger consideration of approximately
$20.4 million and estimated expenses of approximately
$800,000, less the amount of cash, if any, contributed by the
Hamm family trusts to Parent or HPGP Merger Sub that is
available immediately prior to the closing of the Hiland
Holdings merger. Pursuant to its terms, Hiland Holdings is a
third-party beneficiary of the Hiland Holdings commitment letter.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee received an opinion from
Barclays to the effect that, as of the date of the opinion and
based upon and subject to the assumptions and limitations set
forth therein, the cash merger consideration of $2.40 per common
unit to be received by the holders of Hiland Holdings common
units (other than the Hiland Holdings rollover common
unitholders) pursuant to the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
was fair, from a financial point of view, to the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders. Barclays opinion is attached to this
joint proxy statement as Annex F.
|
The HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons (other than Messrs. Griffin and Harrison)
believe that the Hiland Holdings merger is procedurally fair to
the Hiland Holdings public unitholders based on the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, which consists of
directors who are not officers, employees or controlling
unitholders of Hiland Holdings, or affiliated with the Hamm
Continuing Investors, negotiated with Mr. Hamm the terms of
the Hiland Holdings merger. The HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons believe that the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee was therefore able to represent the interests of the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders without the potential
conflicts of interest that the foregoing relationships would
otherwise have presented.
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee retained its own
nationally recognized financial advisor, Barclays, which, in the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees view, had no
relationships that would compromise its independence.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee retained its own legal
advisors, Fulbright and Morris Nichols, which the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee determined had no relationship
creating a potential conflict.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee and its advisors
conducted a due diligence investigation of Hiland Holdings
before commencing negotiations, which the HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons believe provided the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee and its advisors with the information necessary to
effectively represent the interests of the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee had the authority to
reject the transaction proposed by Mr. Hamm and review and
recommend any alternative thereto.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings merger consideration and other terms and
conditions of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement were the
result of extensive negotiations between Parent and the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee and their respective financial and
legal advisors. The Hamm Continuing Investors did not
participate in or have any influence over the conclusions
reached by the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee or the
negotiating positions of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
merger were approved unanimously by the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee, which determined that the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger are advisable,
fair to, and in the best interests of, the Hiland Holdings
public unitholders. The Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
Hiland Holdings merger were also recommended to the Hiland
Holdings public unitholders unanimously by the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee, which further recommended that the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors recommend approval of the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger to the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Holdings Board of Directors approved, and recommended
that the Hiland Holdings public unitholders vote to approve, the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger.
The action by the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors represented
the unanimous approval of the directors of Hiland Holdings,
other than Messrs. Hamm and Reid who recused themselves
from voting.
|
Messrs. Griffin and Harrison believe that the Hiland
Holdings merger is both substantively and procedurally fair to
the Hiland Holdings public unitholders based on the factors
described in Recommendation of the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee and the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors; Reasons for Approving the Merger The
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors beginning on
page 72.
Reasons
of Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons for the Mergers
Under the SEC rules governing going private
transactions, each of the HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons and the HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons (collectively, the Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons) are deemed to be engaged in a going
private transaction and therefore are required to express
their reasons for the proposed mergers to the unaffiliated
unitholders, as defined in
Rule 13e-3
of the Exchange Act, of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings,
respectively. The Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons are making the statements included in this
section solely for the purpose of complying with the
requirements of
Rule 13e-3
and related rules under the Exchange Act.
The Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons decided to pursue the Hiland Partners merger and
the Hiland Holdings merger because they believe that taking the
Hiland Companies private would eliminate the exposure of the
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings public unitholders to
various risks and volatility that began to have serious effects
on the businesses of the Hiland Companies in the third quarter
of 2008. In particular, substantial volatility in NGL prices and
frac spreads and declines in drilling activity along Hiland
Partners systems negatively impacted the Hiland
Companies forecasted throughput volumes, midstream
90
segment margins and cash flows, resulting in a suspension of
quarterly distributions and a meaningful increase in the risk of
a default under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. In
addition, the Hiland Companies experienced significant increases
in the cost of capital and other negative effects of global
economic turmoil. Going private transactions would enable the
public unitholders to receive cash in exchange for their
investments in the Hiland Companies while avoiding the
significant dilution they would experience in connection with an
equity infusion ultimately necessary to stabilize the Hiland
Companies. Further, the Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons believe that responding to the developments
experienced by the Hiland Companies will require tolerance for
volatility in the performance of the business of Hiland Partners
and Hiland Holdings and a willingness to make long-term
investment decisions that carry substantial risks. As private
companies, the Hiland Companies would have increased flexibility
to address these developments through strategies that might
negatively affect short-term results, that would not be feasible
with a public unitholder base or that may exceed the risk
tolerance of public unitholders.
From September 2008 to January 2009, Messrs. Hamm, Griffin
and Harrison began a review of potential alternatives to address
the challenges and risks identified above. During this period,
consideration was given to several approaches including
maintaining the status quo, renegotiating the Hiland Operating
Credit Agreement to achieve temporary covenant relief, selling
certain existing assets to repay debt, issuing convertible
securities to repay bank debt, issuing new equity to maintain
compliance with
debt-to-equity
ratios required under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement,
merging with a third party to alleviate credit concerns, and
engaging in going private transactions led by Mr. Hamm.
Also considered during the same time frame by Messrs. Hamm,
Griffin and Harrison was a potential subordinated debt issuance
funded by Mr. Hamm to pay down existing debt under the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. In subsequent meetings
through April 2009 with Wachovia Securities, these directors and
officers also considered a subordinated debt offering, a rights
offering and a merger of Hiland Holdings with and into Hiland
Partners in conjunction with a rights offering. Please see
Special Factors Summary of Analyses of
Wachovia Securities Summary of Strategic
Alternatives Analysis for a more detailed description of
each alternative.
Based on his review of potential alternatives, Mr. Hamm
believed that the going private transactions were the best
strategic alternative then available to the Hiland Companies to
maximize unitholder value. Mr. Hamm and the other the
Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons believe that structuring the transactions as cash
mergers is preferable to other transaction structures because it
provides the unitholders of both Hiland Partners and Hiland
Holdings with cash for all of their common units and allows for
a prompt and orderly transfer of ownership of the common units
in a single step for each company, without the timing
complexities and uncertainty associated with interdependent
tender offers.
Summary
of Analyses of Wachovia Securities
Mr. Hamm retained Wachovia Securities to act as his
financial advisor in connection with a potential acquisition by
Mr. Hamm
and/or
certain of his affiliates of the assets or capital stock of the
Hiland Companies. Over the course of several months, at the
request of Mr. Hamm, Wachovia Securities prepared and
updated a number of financial, comparative and other analyses
including an analysis of the various strategic alternatives
involving the Hiland Companies to assist Mr. Hamm in
pursuing such potential acquisition of the Hiland Companies. The
financial, comparative and other analyses conducted by Wachovia
Securities, including the analysis of the various strategic
alternatives involving the Hiland Companies, were prepared
solely for Mr. Hamms review and consideration (other
than the presentation dated as of January 21, 2009 which
was presented to the Board of Directors of Hiland Holdings).
None of the analyses conducted by Wachovia Securities was
intended to provide advice to any other person including the
management team the Hiland Companies, their Boards of Directors
or any unitholder of the Hiland Companies. Below is a summary of
the material strategic alternatives analyses contained in
Wachovia Securities presentations made on
December 18, 2008, January 5, 2009 (dated as of
January 5, 2008), January 8, 2009, March 3, 2009,
March 13, 2009 and March 16, 2009, and the final
presentation of Wachovia Securities made to Mr. Hamm on
April 16, 2009 analyzing certain financial aspects of a
going private transaction. The aforementioned summaries are
provided in this joint proxy statement solely for the purpose of
complying with applicable disclosure requirements. The following
summaries, however, do not purport to be a complete description
of the financial, comparative and
91
other analyses performed by Wachovia Securities. The preparation
of financial, comparative and other analyses is a complex
analytical process involving various determinations as to the
most appropriate and relevant methods of analysis and the
application of those methods to the particular circumstances and
therefore, is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or
summary description. Some of the summaries of the financial
analyses include information presented in tabular format. The
tables must be read together with the full text of each summary
and are alone not a complete description of Wachovia
Securities financial analyses. The analyses described
herein, the order in which they are presented and the results of
the analyses do not represent relative importance or weight
given to those analyses by Wachovia Securities. Wachovia
Securities believes that selecting portions of the analyses and
the factors considered or focusing on information presented in
tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors,
the narrative description and the full text of the analyses,
could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes
underlying Wachovia Securities analyses. The fact that any
specific analysis has been referred to in the summary below is
not meant to indicate that such analysis was viewed as any more
significant or was or should be given any greater weight than
any other analysis in any presentation. The presentations of
Wachovia Securities are filed as Exhibits 4 through 16 of
the
Schedule 13e-3
filed by Hiland Partners and as Exhibits 4 through 16 of
the
Schedule 13e-3
filed by Hiland Holdings and are incorporated herein by
reference. The descriptions of the analyses below are qualified
by reference to the full text of such analyses. Copies of the
presentations may be obtained from the SEC. See Where You
Can Find More Information beginning on page 191.
Mr. Hamm did not request, and Wachovia Securities did not
provide, any opinion as to the fairness of the merger
consideration or any other aspect of the mergers to
Mr. Hamm, the other Hamm Continuing Investors, Hiland
Partners, the unitholders of Hiland Partners, Hiland Holdings,
the unitholders of Hiland Holdings or any other person, or any
other valuation of Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings for the
purpose of assessing the fairness of the merger consideration or
any other aspect of the mergers to Mr. Hamm, the other Hamm
Continuing Investors, Hiland Partners, the unitholders of Hiland
Partners, Hiland Holdings, the unitholders of Hiland Holdings or
any other person.
Wachovia Securities has established procedures for rendering a
fairness opinion, including review of the fairness opinion and
the underlying information, comparisons and analyses by a
fairness committee composed of senior investment bankers with
relevant expertise. Because Wachovia Securities was not
requested to and did not render a fairness opinion, it was not
necessary to, and it did not, submit the information,
comparisons and analyses described below to a fairness opinion
committee for review, nor did Wachovia Securities follow all of
the procedures that it ordinarily follows in connection with
rendering a fairness opinion. Had Wachovia Securities been
requested to provide an opinion or been requested to recommend
or provide support for a fair or appropriate valuation of Hiland
Partners
and/or
Hiland Holdings securities and submitted the information,
comparisons and analyses in its presentations to its full
fairness opinion process, including review by a fairness
committee, the information, comparisons and analyses presented
by Wachovia Securities following that process may have been
different from those included in the presentations and described
below.
Wachovia Securities delivered its analyses for the information
of Mr. Hamm in connection with his consideration of the
Hiland Partners merger and the Hiland Holdings merger. Wachovia
Securities did not make, and its analyses do not constitute, a
recommendation to Mr. Hamm or any other person or as to how
any Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings unitholder should vote
with respect to the Hiland Partners merger, the Hiland Holdings
merger, or any other matter.
In connection with providing financial advice and preparing its
financial analysis, Wachovia Securities made such reviews,
analyses and inquiries as it deemed necessary and appropriate
under the circumstances. Among other things, Wachovia Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed and discussed with the management of the Hiland
Companies, certain business, financial and other information,
including financial projections, regarding the Hiland Companies
that were furnished periodically to Wachovia Securities by the
management of the Hiland Companies.
|
|
|
|
Reviewed certain periodic reports including financial statements
and other publicly available business and financial information
regarding the Hiland Companies.
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the unit price and trading history of the Hiland
Companies.
|
|
|
|
Discussed the Hiland Companies past and current
operations, financial condition and prospects with Mr. Hamm.
|
|
|
|
Considered certain business, financial and other information
regarding the Hiland Companies and compared that information
with corresponding information for certain other publicly traded
partnerships
and/or
transactions that Wachovia Securities deemed relevant.
|
|
|
|
Performed discounted cash flow analysis based upon financial
forecasts and other estimates gathered from public sources and
provided by management of the Hiland Companies, and other
assumptions discussed with and confirmed as reasonable by the
management of the Hiland Companies.
|
|
|
|
Reviewed certain drafts of the Hiland Partners merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
Considered other information, such as financial studies,
analyses and investigations, as well as financial, economic and
market criteria that Wachovia Securities deemed relevant.
|
In connection with its review, Wachovia Securities assumed and
relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and
other information reviewed by it, including all information,
analyses and assumptions relating to accounting, legal and tax
matters, and Wachovia Securities did not assume any
responsibility for, nor did it independently verify, such
information or physically inspect any of the Hiland
Companies assets. Wachovia Securities relied upon the
assurances of the management of the Hiland Companies that they
are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such
information about the Hiland Companies inaccurate or misleading,
Wachovia Securities relied upon financial forecasts, as well as
estimates, judgments, allocations and assumptions of management
of the Hiland Companies regarding the future financial
performance of the Hiland Companies furnished to it by the
management of the Hiland Companies and was advised by the
management of the Hiland Companies and assumed, at
Mr. Hamms direction, that such financial forecasts,
as well as the estimates, judgments, allocations and assumptions
upon which such financial forecasts are based, have been
reasonably formulated and reflect the best then currently
available estimates, judgments, allocations and assumptions of
the management of the Hiland Companies regarding the future
financial performance of the Hiland Companies. Wachovia
Securities assumed no responsibility for, and expressed no view
as to, any such financial forecasts or the estimates, judgments,
allocations or assumptions on which they were based. In
developing its financial analysis, Wachovia Securities did not
prepare or obtain any independent evaluations or appraisals of
the assets or liabilities of the Hiland Companies, including any
contingent liabilities, nor was Wachovia Securities provided
with any such evaluations or appraisals. Unless otherwise
stated, Wachovia Securities also assumed that there had been no
material changes in the condition (financial or otherwise),
results of operations, business or prospects of the Hiland
Companies since the date of the last financial statements
provided to it. In addition, Wachovia Securities did not
consider or analyze the price at which the securities of the
Hiland Companies may trade following the announcement of the
mergers. Wachovia Securities presentations were
necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions as in
effect on, and information made available to it as of, the date
of such presentations. Hence, although subsequent developments
may affect the information contained in the presentations
Wachovia Securities did not assume any obligation to update,
revise or reaffirm the contents of the presentations. At the
direction of Mr. Hamm, other than with respect to the
presentations dated as of March 13, 2009, March 16,
2009 and March 17, 2009, Wachovia Securities assumed the
continuation of all existing contracts with the current
customers of the Hiland Companies.
Except as otherwise set forth in this section of Summary
of Analyses of Wachovia Securities, Mr. Hamm imposed
no instructions or limitations on Wachovia Securities with
respect to the investigations made or the procedures followed by
Wachovia Securities.
Summary
of Strategic Alternatives Analysis
The following is a summary of the material strategic
alternatives analyses contained in Wachovia Securities
presentations made on December 18, 2008, January 5,
2009 (dated as of January 5, 2008), January 8, 2009,
March 3, 2009, March 13, 2009 and March 16, 2009.
93
Status Quo. According to the management of
Hiland Partners, Hiland Partners was likely to be in violation
of the leverage ratio covenant under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement as early as June 30, 2009. Wachovia Securities
identified the following as potential impacts in the event that
Hiland Partners would not change its operations, organizational
structure or capital structure: (i) Hiland Partners
general recovery and continued compliance with its financial
covenants under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement would
likely be dependent on a sharp increase in near term commodity
prices, (ii) in the absence of such increase in commodity
prices, distributions on Hiland Partners common units
could not be sustainable and capital expenditures would likely
be curtailed, (iii) the prospects of a capital raise could
be low, and (iv) the potential for a default under the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement could remain high. Wachovia
Securities also analyzed a scenario in which Hiland Partners
would discontinue growth capital expenditures and a scenario in
which Hiland Partners would discontinue growth capital
expenditures and eliminate distributions. Under both of these
scenarios, compliance with Hiland Partners financial
covenants would still be dependent on a sharp increase in
near-term commodity prices.
Renegotiate Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement. Wachovia Securities analyzed a
scenario in which Hiland Partners would renegotiate the terms of
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement with the lenders
thereunder in an effort to secure relief from certain financial
covenants including the leverage ratio covenant. Wachovia
Securities identified the following considerations with respect
to such a scenario: (i) the ability to maintain Hiland
Partners asset base and the ability of all unitholders to
participate in any future upside generated by those assets, and
(ii) the protection of investors from dilution that would
occur through alternative financing alternatives. However, given
the unsuccessful attempt by Hiland Partners in November 2008 to
increase the borrowing base under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement on acceptable terms and the global financial crisis
regarding financial institutions Wachovia Securities also
identified the following as potential impacts of such a
scenario: (i) there was a strong likelihood of disapproval
from banks who were members of the lender group to any such
renegotiation of terms, and (ii) given the magnitude of the
covenant violation, the terms on which the lenders would be
willing to renegotiate the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement
were likely to be onerous for Hiland Partners.
Sale of Selected Existing Assets. Another
option analyzed by Wachovia Securities was a sale of selected
assets, the proceeds of which would be used to partially repay
existing debt under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. A
sale of selected assets could potentially provide proceeds to
Hiland Partners in the near term. However, given the global
credit crisis and limited ability of companies to secure
acquisition financing and the depressed equity markets, Wachovia
Securities identified the following considerations with respect
to a sale of selected assets: (i) the existence of a
limited universe of potential buyers, and (ii) the
anticipation that such buyers would likely seek Hiland
Partners highest quality assets in any such transaction
for a price at the low range of their valuation. This would
result in Hiland Partners becoming an entity that could be too
small to remain public. Wachovia Securities also analyzed that
the benefits of an asset sale would likely be mitigated by the
negative impact on the borrowing capacity under Hiland Operating
Credit Agreement.
Issuance of Convertible Security. A further
strategic alternative analyzed by Wachovia Securities was the
potential issuance of a convertible security by Hiland Partners,
the proceeds of which would be used to partially repay existing
debt under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. If such a
transaction could be executed, it could strengthen Hiland
Partners balance sheet and allow for Hiland Partners
continued independence compared to a business combination or
strategic transaction with Mr. Hamm or a third party.
Wachovia Securities identified the following additional
considerations with respect to any such transaction:
(i) the need for approval of the unitholders of Hiland
Partners, (ii) likely significant dilution of ownership and
cash distributions to existing unitholders, including Hiland
Holdings, upon conversion of the security to common equity,
(iii) given the financial condition of Hiland Partners, the
existence of a potentially limited universe of investors in such
a security, and (iv) significant execution risk as a result
of the foregoing.
Issuance of Subordinated Debt. Wachovia
Securities also analyzed a subordinated debt issuance by Hiland
Partners, the proceeds of which would be used to partially repay
existing debt under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. The
subordinated debt issuance would take the form of a subordinated
loan with a blended coupon paid in cash and
in-kind.
Such a transaction could enable Hiland Partners to make
distributions on common and subordinated units through the end
of 2011, and could give unitholders the
94
ability to participate in future prospects of Hiland Partners
which could be positive in the event of a recovery by Hiland
Partners. A subordinated debt issuance could likely enable
Hiland Partners to preserve its independence. Wachovia
Securities identified the following additional considerations
with respect to any such transaction: (i) such a
transaction would require the consent of existing lenders under
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, including their agreement
to modify certain financial covenants, (ii) even though a
subordinated debt issuance was not anticipated to result in an
immediate dilution of unitholders, it would likely need to be
refinanced with new equity, which would lead to significant
dilution of ownership and cash distributions to unitholders,
including Hiland Holdings, and (iii) given the financial
condition of Hiland Partners, there would likely be a
potentially limited universe of investors in such a security.
Issuance of New Common Equity. Wachovia
Securities also analyzed the possibility of Hiland Partners
issuing new common equity to the public, the proceeds of which
would be used to partially repay existing debt under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement. If such a transaction could be
executed, it could strengthen Hiland Partners balance
sheet and allow for Hiland Partners continued
independence. Wachovia Securities identified the following as
potential impacts of any such transaction: (i) such a
transaction would result in dilution of ownership and cash
distributions to existing unitholders and would likely require
their approval, (ii) issuance of new common equity to the
public could permanently impair the value of Hiland
Partners subordinated units and incentive distribution
rights (all of which are owned by Hiland Holdings) by increasing
the number of common units that would be entitled to receive
minimum quarterly distribution (and arrearages) prior to any
distributions on the subordinated units and incentive
distribution rights, and (iii) the size of equity
transaction required to achieve financial covenant compliance
could be challenging given the existing equity market
capitalization, float and financial condition of Hiland
Partners. As a result of the foregoing and given the high
volatility of public equity markets, this alternative possessed
significant execution risk.
Merger with Third Party. Wachovia Securities
also analyzed the possibility of merging Hiland Partners with an
unaffiliated third party, which could generate synergies and
potentially alleviate concerns related to the Hiland Operating
Credit Agreement. Such merger transaction could preserve
unitholder participation in the event of a future recovery,
provide business and financial diversification and mitigate
operational and financial risk. Wachovia Securities identified
the following as additional considerations with respect to any
such transaction: (i) given the financial condition of
Hiland Partners, there could be a potentially limited universe
of investors, and (ii) any such merger transaction would
likely result in the loss of control of the surviving entity by
Mr. Hamm, who had indicated that he was interested only in
acquiring common units of Hiland Partners and not selling his
interest in Hiland Partners.
Rights Offering. An additional strategic
alternative analyzed by Wachovia Securities was a rights
offering by Hiland Partners, the proceeds of which would be used
to partially repay existing debt under the Hiland Operating
Credit Agreement. Under the contemplated rights offering,
existing unitholders would be issued rights on a pro rata basis
to acquire newly issued common units of Hiland Partners. In
addition, Mr. Hamm would act as the standby purchaser in
the offering. Existing unitholders who had an interest could
maintain their relative percentage ownership of Hiland Partners
by exercising their rights to purchase common units issued by
Hiland Partners at a discount to the public trading price. Such
a transaction could potentially result in a smaller cash outlay
from Mr. Hamm compared to a going private alternative.
Wachovia Securities identified the following as additional
potential impacts of any such transaction: (i) it would not
provide liquidity at a premium for investors who were interested
in selling their common units, (ii) it would effectively
force Hiland Holdings to raise equity to participate in the
rights offering in order to avoid dilution of its ownership
interest in Hiland Partners, (iii) it would require
approval by the unitholders; (iv) given the impaired
financial condition of Hiland Partners, the existing
unitholders participation in a rights offering would
likely be limited, (v) any such transaction would increase
the aggregate number of units of Hiland Partners and could
consequently limit the ability of Hiland Partners to pay its
minimum quarterly distribution to its common unitholders,
resulting in the obligation to pay arrearages prior to any
distributions on the subordinated units and incentive
distribution rights could be made and as a result diminishing
the value of each of the Hiland Partners common units,
subordinated units and incentive distribution rights as well as
Hiland Holdings units.
Merger of Hiland Holdings with Hiland
Partners. Wachovia Securities also analyzed a
potential merger of Hiland Holdings with and into Hiland
Partners to be followed by a rights offering. By merging Hiland
95
Holdings with and into Hiland Partners, the organizational
structure of the Hiland Companies would be simplified and the
public company expenses of Hiland Holdings would be eliminated.
Wachovia Securities identified the following considerations with
respect to any such transaction: (i) any such transaction
presented complexity and timing issues, (ii) there could be
difficulty valuing Hiland Holdings as a stand alone entity and
determining an exchange ratio between each Hiland Partners unit
and Hiland Holdings unit, (iii) there would likely be a
need to raise substantial equity in the
follow-up
rights offering which would result in dilution to unitholders of
the combined entity and potentially reduce any future
distributions to the unitholders of such entity, and
(iv) any such transaction would be subject to approval of
the unitholders of each of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings.
Going Private Transactions. Wachovia
Securities analyzed a potential going private transaction of
each of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings. Such transactions
would potentially provide investors in the Hiland Companies with
greater transaction certainty, liquidity at a premium at a time
when Hiland Partners financial condition was considered to
be impaired and Hiland Partners was expected to violate certain
of its financial covenants, including the leverage ratio
covenant. Wachovia Securities identified the following
additional considerations with respect to any such transaction:
(i) it would prevent current public unitholders from
participating in the future prospects and risks of equity
ownership in the Hiland Companies, (ii) the Hiland
Companies could operate without the constraints, including
costs, of being a public company, retain cash flows (instead of
paying quarterly cash distributions) and pursue long-term
projects, and (iii) as notified by MidFirst Bank,
Mr. Hamm would likely be required to contribute substantial
new equity to reduce existing debt of Hiland Partners and
negotiate revisions to the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
Summary
of Financial Analyses
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
contained in Wachovia Securities final presentation made
to Mr. Hamm on April 16, 2009. The summary of the
selected comparable transactions analysis is based in part on
information included in Wachovia Securities presentation
on January 5, 2009 (dated as of January 5, 2008),
which was referenced in summary format and updated in Wachovia
Securities final presentation made to Mr. Hamm on
April 16, 2009. Management of the Hiland Companies provided
Wachovia Securities financial projections to assist Wachovia
Securities in performing its financial analysis. These financial
projections consisted of managements estimates with
respect to the Hiland Companies future financial
performance for the years 2009 through 2013 based on numerous
assumptions made by management of the Hiland Companies, which
are described in more detail under the heading Projected
Financial Information, below.
Selected Comparable Transactions Analysis. For
reference purposes only, using publicly available information,
including research analysts estimates and public filings,
Wachovia Securities reviewed the following six selected
transactions involving midstream MLPs announced during 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Announcement Date
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Seller
|
|
December 8, 2008
|
|
Duncan Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
Enterprise Products Partners, L.P.
|
November 11, 2008
|
|
Western Gas Partners, LP
|
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
|
September 17, 2008
|
|
El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.
|
|
El Paso Corporation
|
September 16, 2008
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
Millennium Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
August 28, 2008
|
|
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
Knight Inc.
|
April 30, 2008
|
|
Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P.
|
|
Mobil Pipe Line Company
|
Wachovia Securities reviewed, among other things, the aggregate
consideration paid to sellers in the selected transactions as a
multiple of estimated 2009 EBITDA. Wachovia Securities then
applied a range of estimated 2009 EBITDA multiples of 7.0x to
9.0x derived from the selected transactions, to
managements March 31, 2009 estimates of Hiland
Partners 2009 projected EBITDA of $41.1 million.
Financial data for the
96
selected transactions were based on public filings and publicly
available financial information at the time of announcement of
the relevant transaction. Financial data for Hiland Partners
consisted of managements estimates. This analysis resulted
in the following implied per unit equity reference ranges for
Hiland Partners as of April 16, 2009:
Implied
Hiland Partners Common Unit Equity Reference Range
|
|
|
|
|
Common and Subordinated Units aggregate
|
|
$
|
1.71 - $10.34
|
|
Common Units only
|
|
$
|
2.52 - $15.21
|
|
Based on the number of Hiland Partners common and subordinated
units owned by Hiland Holdings, Wachovia Securities derived the
following implied per unit equity reference ranges for Hiland
Holdings, as compared to the $2.49 closing price for Hiland
Holdings common units as of April 14, 2009:
Implied
Hiland Holdings Common Unit Equity Reference Range
|
|
|
|
|
Common and Subordinated Units aggregate
|
|
$
|
0.44 - $2.67
|
|
Common Units only
|
|
$
|
0.29 - $1.77
|
|
Comparable Partnership Analysis. Using
publicly available information, including research
analysts estimates and public filings, Wachovia Securities
reviewed and compared specific financial, operating and equity
market data relating to Hiland Partners with that of the
following selected publicly traded gas gathering and processing
MLPs that Wachovia Securities deemed comparable to Hiland
Partners:
Comparable
Midstream Companies and Partnerships
|
|
|
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P.
|
|
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
Copano Energy, L.L.C.
|
|
Quicksilver Gas Services LP
|
Crosstex Energy, L.P.
|
|
Regency Energy Partners LP
|
DCP Midstream Partners, LP
|
|
Targa Resources Partners LP
|
Eagle Rock Energy Partners,L.P.
|
|
Western Gas Partners, LP
|
Exterran Partners, L.P.
|
|
Williams Partners L.P.
|
For each of the partnerships listed above, Wachovia Securities
analyzed valuation multiples, including (i) distributable
cash flow (defined as net income plus depreciation and
amortization and other non-cash items less maintenance capital
expenditures) for the calendar years ending December 31,
2009 and 2010 divided by total current distributions;
(ii) implied firm value (defined as common and subordinated
units multiplied by the market price of common units) divided by
adjusted EBITDA (defined as earnings before interest, tax,
depreciation and amortization less distributions to the general
partner) estimates (based on First Call consensus estimates) for
the calendar years ending December 31, 2009 and 2010; and
(iii) net debt (based on First Call consensus estimates)
divided by EBITDA estimates (based on First Call consensus
estimates) for the calendar year ending December 31, 2009.
The analysis was compiled using publicly available information,
including closing equity market data as of April 14, 2009
and First Call consensus estimates for EBITDA for the comparable
partnerships and both publicly available information and
managements March 31, 2009 estimates of Hiland
Partners projected EBITDA and net debt. The following
table presents the results of this analysis with respect to the
comparable partnerships selected by Wachovia Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable Cash Flow /
|
|
Implied Firm Value /
|
|
Net Debt /
|
|
|
Total Distributions
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
EBITDA
|
Comparable Partnerships
|
|
2009E
|
|
2010E
|
|
2009E
|
|
2010E
|
|
2009E
|
|
Mean
|
|
1.1x
|
|
1.5x
|
|
8.2x
|
|
7.0x
|
|
4.4x
|
Median
|
|
1.1x
|
|
1.4x
|
|
8.2x
|
|
7.0x
|
|
4.2x
|
97
The following table presents the results of this analysis with
respect to Hiland Partners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable Cash Flow /
|
|
Implied Firm Value /
|
|
Net Debt /
|
|
|
Total Distributions
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
EBITDA
|
Hiland Partners
|
|
2009E
|
|
2010E
|
|
2009E
|
|
2010E
|
|
2009E
|
|
First Call consensus estimates
|
|
1.1x
|
|
2.0x
|
|
7.2x
|
|
5.6x
|
|
5.5x
|
Management projections
|
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
|
8.4x
|
|
7.8x
|
|
6.6x
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Wachovia
Securities performed a discounted cash flow analysis of Hiland
Partners using managements March 31, 2009 estimates
of Hiland Partners 2009 through 2013 projected EBITDA. In
conducting this analysis, Wachovia Securities arrived at the
discounted cash flow by adding the projected unlevered free cash
flows calculated by subtracting working capital usage,
maintenance capital expenditures, expansion capital expenditures
and other long-term liabilities from projected EBITDA for Hiland
Partners and a terminal value calculated as a 9.0x multiple of
2013 projected EBITDA. The projections were accepted without any
adjustment for risks or circumstances that might cause actual
results to vary from them. The projected free cash flows and
implied terminal value indications were discounted using a rate
of 20% to arrive at the estimated present enterprise value for
Hiland Partners as of April 16, 2009. From this enterprise
value, Wachovia Securities derived an implied per unit value for
both Hiland Partners common and subordinated units
aggregated together and Hiland Partners common units as a
separate class. The following table presents the results of this
analysis:
Implied
Equity Value Per Unit Based Upon Discounted Cash Flow
Analysis
(assuming 9.0x exit multiple and 20% discount rate)
|
|
|
|
|
Common and Subordinated Units aggregate
|
|
$
|
3.21
|
|
Common Units only
|
|
$
|
4.73
|
|
Wachovia Securities also performed a sensitivity analysis of the
discounted cash flow analysis using discount rates ranging
between 10% and 25% and multiples of 2013 projected EBITDA
ranging between 7.0x and 11.0x. This resulted in implied per
unit values for Hiland Partners common and subordinated
units aggregated together ranging between $22.67 and minus $5.72
and for Hiland Partners common units as a separate class
ranging between $33.37 and minus $8.42.
EBITDA Analysis. Wachovia Securities compared
managements January 16, 2009 and March 31, 2009
estimates of Hiland Partners 2009 to 2013 projected
EBITDA. The differences in projected EBITDA and the decrease in
the implied terminal value calculated as a 9.0x multiple of the
difference in 2013 projected EBITDA were discounted at a rate of
20% which resulted in a present value total decrease of
$14.5 million from the January 16, 2009 projections.
This analysis implied a total decrease per Hiland Partners unit
of $1.52, including common units, subordinated units and general
partner interest. Based on the number of Hiland Partners common
units owned by Hiland Holdings, Wachovia Securities derived an
implied total decrease per Hiland Holdings common unit of $0.39.
Liquidation Analysis. Wachovia Securities
utilized March 31, 2009 management estimates of Hiland
Partners EBITDA for the calendar year ending
December 31, 2009 to evaluate an estimated liquidation
value per Hiland Partners common unit and Hiland Holdings common
unit. Assuming a range of multiples of total enterprise value
over projected EBITDA from 6.0x to 8.5x, Wachovia Securities
arrived at a range of implied liquidation prices for Hiland
Partners of between $246.9 million and $349.7 million.
Wachovia Securities then reduced the implied liquidation prices
by management projections of Hiland Partners net debt of
$272.3 million as of June 30, 2009. This analysis
resulted in a range of implied Hiland Partners liquidation value
ranging between $11.94 and minus $3.93 per common unit. Based on
the number of Hiland Partners common units owned by Hiland
Holdings, Wachovia Securities derived a range of implied Hiland
Holdings liquidation value ranging between $1.39 and minus $0.46
per common unit.
Purchase Price Analysis. Based on publicly
available information and March 31, 2009 management
estimates of Hiland Partners EBITDA for the calendar years
ending December 31, 2009 and December 31,
98
2010, and assuming a unit price of $7.78 per Hiland Partners
common unit and $2.49 per Hiland Holdings common unit, Wachovia
Securities calculated the total implied enterprise value at
$357 million. Wachovia Securities then divided the total
implied enterprise value by EBITDA or projected EBITDA, as
applicable, for the last twelve months and the calendar years
ending December 31, 2008, December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2010 and obtained multiples of 5.2x, 5.3x,
8.6x and 7.8x, respectively. Wachovia Securities then performed
a sensitivity analysis of these multiples based on unit prices
ranging between $5.00 and $9.50 per Hiland Partners common unit
and between $1.50 and $3.20 per Hiland Holdings common unit.
This analysis resulted in total enterprise value over EBITDA
multiples ranging between 7.8x and 9.1x based on estimates of
Hiland Partners EBITDA for the calendar year ending
December 31, 2009 and total enterprise value over EBITDA
multiples ranging between 7.1x and 8.3x based on estimates of
Hiland Partners EBITDA for the calendar year ending
December 31, 2010.
Miscellaneous. In performing its analysis
Wachovia Securities considered industry performance, general
business and economic conditions and other matters, many of
which are beyond the control of the Hiland Companies or
Mr. Hamm. The estimates of the future performance of the
Hiland Companies provided by the management of the Hiland
Companies in or underlying Wachovia Securities analyses
are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future
results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than
those suggested by Wachovia Securities analyses. These
analyses were prepared solely as part of the preparation of
presentations to Mr. Hamm. The estimates used in, and the
ranges of valuations resulting from, any particular analysis
described above are inherently subject to substantial
uncertainty and should not be taken to be Wachovia
Securities view of the actual value of the Hiland
Companies. Therefore neither the Hiland Companies nor Wachovia
Securities nor any other person assumes any responsibility if
future results are materially different from those estimated or
indicated.
No partnership, transaction or business utilized in the analyses
conducted by Wachovia Securities is identical or directly
comparable to the Hiland Companies or the mergers. Therefore, a
purely quantitative comparable transactions analysis, comparable
partnership analysis or other quantitative analyses would not be
dispositive in the context of the Hiland Partners and Hiland
Holdings mergers, and an appropriate use of such analyses
involves qualitative judgments concerning the differences
between the characteristics of the various partnerships,
transactions or businesses and the Hiland Partners and Hiland
Holdings mergers that would affect the value of the selected
partnerships, transactions, businesses and Hiland Partners and
Hiland Holdings.
The decision to enter into the merger agreements was solely that
of Mr. Hamm and the other parties to each such merger
agreement respectively. The type and the amount of consideration
payable in the mergers were determined through negotiations
between Mr. Hamm and each of the conflicts committees, and
were not determined or recommended by Wachovia Securities.
Mr. Hamm selected Wachovia Securities as his financial
advisor because it is an internationally recognized investment
banking firm which regularly provides investment banking and
other financial advisory services in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions
of listed and unlisted securities and private placements, its
familiarity with the Hiland Companies and their business, and
after meeting with two other investment banking firms and
considering their respective experience in the field,
preliminary views and fee proposals.
Pursuant to the terms of Wachovia Securities engagement
letter, Mr. Hamm has agreed to pay Wachovia Securities
customary fees for advisory services in relation to the
acquisition of the Hiland Companies by Mr. Hamm and certain
of his affiliates. In addition, Mr. Hamm has agreed to
reimburse Wachovia Securities for reasonable travel and other
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with Wachovia Securities
engagement including certain fees of outside counsel and to
indemnify Wachovia Securities, its affiliates and certain other
related parties for certain liabilities that may arise out of
Wachovia Securities engagement by Mr. Hamm.
Wachovia Securities is an affiliate of Wells Fargo &
Company, which through its subsidiaries and affiliates provides
a full range of investment and commercial banking advice and
services, including financial advisory services; securities
underwritings and placements; securities sales and trading;
brokerage advice and services; and commercial loans. In that
regard, Wachovia Securities
and/or its
affiliates have in the past
99
provided, currently are providing and may in the future provide,
investment and commercial banking advice and financial advisory
and financing or other services to, and otherwise seek to expand
or maintain its business and commercial relationships, with
Hiland Partners, the general partner of Hiland Partners, Hiland
Holdings, the general partner of Hiland Holdings, Mr. Hamm,
Parent
and/or
certain of their respective affiliates, for which Wachovia
Securities and its affiliates have received and would expect to
receive customary compensation. In particular, these services
include, among other things, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., each an affiliate of
Wachovia Securities that participated in Hiland Partners
$300 million senior secured credit facility. In the
ordinary course of business, Wachovia Securities or its
affiliates may actively trade or hold securities or other
financial instruments including loans of Mr. Hamm, Hiland
Partners and Hiland Holdings as applicable and certain of their
respective affiliates for their own account or for the account
of their customers, and accordingly they may at any time hold
long or short positions in these securities or financial
instruments.
Wachovia Securities is a trade name of Wachovia Capital Markets,
LLC, an investment banking subsidiary of Wells Fargo &
Company.
Projected
Financial Information
As part of their annual financial planning process, the Hiland
Companies prepare a budget for their upcoming fiscal year and a
projection of operating and financial results for the five-year
period beginning with that upcoming fiscal year. While the
Hiland Companies do release annual guidance from time to time,
they do not, as a matter of course, publicly disclose their full
financial projections. Harold Hamm, however, as the controlling
equity holder and chairman of the Board of Directors of each of
the Hiland Companies, generally has access to these projections.
In connection with their consideration of the January 15
Proposal, each of the Conflicts Committees and their respective
financial advisors received certain projected financial
information, which management regularly updated to include the
most recently available information on drilling activity and
then-current forward commodity pricing. In some cases the
projections also included sensitivity analyses illustrating how
certain of the projections would change based on varying
assumptions for (i) future crude oil prices,
(ii) future natural gas prices, and (iii) the future
correlation between crude oil and NGL prices based on three-,
six-, 12- and
24-month
historical correlations.
Management first provided projections to the Conflicts
Committees on February 13, 2009, in connection with
managements initial presentation to the Conflicts
Committees and their advisors. A summary of managements
assumptions and projections follows. These assumptions and
projections were also made available to Harold Hamm.
100
Summary
Projected Financial Data for Hiland Partners
(Provided on February 13, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Pricing Forward Pricing as of 1/16/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed NYMEX Gas Price(1)
|
|
$
|
5.38
|
|
|
$
|
6.70
|
|
|
$
|
7.12
|
|
|
$
|
7.27
|
|
|
$
|
7.29
|
|
Assumed NYMEX Crude Oil Price
|
|
$
|
51.72
|
|
|
$
|
62.49
|
|
|
$
|
67.10
|
|
|
$
|
70.49
|
|
|
$
|
72.50
|
|
OPIS Conway NGL Simple Average(2)
|
|
$
|
0.7475
|
|
|
$
|
0.8028
|
|
|
$
|
1.0131
|
|
|
$
|
1.0644
|
|
|
$
|
1.0947
|
|
OPIS Mont Belvieu NGL Simple Average(2)
|
|
$
|
0.7853
|
|
|
$
|
0.8531
|
|
|
$
|
1.0411
|
|
|
$
|
1.0937
|
|
|
$
|
1.1248
|
|
Inlet natural gas volumes (Mcf/d)
|
|
|
291,139
|
|
|
|
290,387
|
|
|
|
291,617
|
|
|
|
291,374
|
|
|
|
291,155
|
|
EBITDA ($ in millions)(3)
|
|
$
|
44.4
|
|
|
$
|
50.2
|
|
|
$
|
51.6
|
|
|
$
|
54.1
|
|
|
$
|
55.1
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures ($ in millions)
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
Growth capital expenditures ($ in millions)
|
|
$
|
18.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In determining projected EBITDA for 2009 and 2010, management
used then-current estimated forward quotes for natural gas
pipeline basis differentials. In determining projected EBITDA
for 2011 through 2013, natural gas basis differentials were
based on their historical percentage of the NYMEX price. |
|
(2) |
|
NGL prices were based on forward quotes for 2009 and 2010 and
the trailing
12-month
historical correlations to crude oil as of December 31,
2008 for 2011 through 2013. |
|
(3) |
|
EBITDA, a Non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as
net income (loss) plus interest expense, provisions for income
taxes, and depreciation, amortization and accretion expense.
Please see Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
Management also included in its projections a calculation of the
leverage ratio under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement based
upon the projected financial information. Managements
calculations showed that, assuming no distributions were made to
Hiland Partners unitholders, Hiland Partners
leverage ratio would be 4.98x at the end of the second quarter
of 2009, 5.68x at the end of the third quarter of 2009 and 5.81x
at the end of the fourth quarter of 2009, all in excess of the
then maximum permissible leverage ratio of 4.0x under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement. The projected leverage ratios were
also in excess of the maximum permissible leverage ratio of
4.75x that would be in effect upon the
step-up
of the leverage ratio that management anticipated electing
pursuant to the provisions of the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement at the end of the first quarter. The leverage ratio
would be required to be stepped back down to 4.0x at the end of
the fourth quarter of 2009. Based on these projections,
management estimated that at least $80 million of equity
would need to be infused into Hiland Partners by
December 31, 2009 to be in compliance with the leverage
ratio covenant.
At the same meeting, management provided sensitivity analyses
illustrating how certain of the projections, including the
EBITDA projections, would change based on assumptions for
(i) future NYMEX crude oil prices ranging from $40 to $60
per barrel, (ii) future NYMEX natural gas prices ranging
from $4.00 to $7.50 per MMBtu, and (iii) the future
correlation between NYMEX crude oil and NGL prices based on
three-, six-, 12- and
24-month
historical correlations.
101
A summary of the sensitivity analyses management provided on
February 13, 2009 regarding 2009 EBITDA is shown below.
2009
ESTIMATED EBITDA
(Provided on February 13, 2009)
($ in million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed NYMEX
|
|
Assumed NYMEX Gas Price
|
|
|
Historical NGL/Crude
|
Crude Oil Price
|
|
$4.00
|
|
|
$6.00
|
|
|
$7.50
|
|
|
Price Correlation
|
|
|
|
$
|
51.5
|
|
|
$
|
48.1
|
|
|
$
|
46.7
|
|
|
3-month
|
|
|
$
|
53.8
|
|
|
$
|
50.4
|
|
|
$
|
47.8
|
|
|
6-month
|
$60.00
|
|
$
|
56.8
|
|
|
$
|
53.3
|
|
|
$
|
50.7
|
|
|
12-month
|
|
|
$
|
61.9
|
|
|
$
|
58.4
|
|
|
$
|
55.9
|
|
|
24-month
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
38.5
|
|
|
$
|
38.7
|
|
|
3-month
|
|
|
$
|
43.9
|
|
|
$
|
40.4
|
|
|
$
|
39.7
|
|
|
6-month
|
$50.00
|
|
$
|
46.3
|
|
|
$
|
42.9
|
|
|
$
|
40.7
|
|
|
12-month
|
|
|
$
|
50.6
|
|
|
$
|
47.2
|
|
|
$
|
44.6
|
|
|
24-month
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32.6
|
|
|
$
|
31.4
|
|
|
$
|
30.7
|
|
|
3-month
|
|
|
$
|
34.0
|
|
|
$
|
31.8
|
|
|
$
|
31.3
|
|
|
6-month
|
$40.00
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
$
|
32.5
|
|
|
$
|
32.8
|
|
|
12-month
|
|
|
$
|
39.3
|
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
$
|
35.4
|
|
|
24-month
|
Management provided updates to the projections to each of the
Conflicts Committees and their respective advisors and to
Mr. Hamms advisors on February 23, April 1,
April 28 and May 28. Management did not provide
sensitivities analyses in connection with the updated
projections.
The projections provided to each Conflicts Committee on
April 1, 2009, are summarized below.
Summary
Projected Financial Data for Hiland Partners
(Provided on April 1, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Pricing Forward Pricing as of 3/31/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed NYMEX Gas Price(1)
|
|
$
|
4.44
|
|
|
$
|
5.92
|
|
|
$
|
6.68
|
|
|
$
|
6.84
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
Assumed NYMEX Crude Oil Price
|
|
$
|
50.72
|
|
|
$
|
62.69
|
|
|
$
|
67.71
|
|
|
$
|
70.13
|
|
|
$
|
72.17
|
|
OPIS Conway NGL Simple Average(2)
|
|
$
|
0.7301
|
|
|
$
|
0.7691
|
|
|
$
|
1.0224
|
|
|
$
|
1.0589
|
|
|
$
|
1.0897
|
|
OPIS Mont Belvieu NGL Simple Average(2)
|
|
$
|
0.7730
|
|
|
$
|
0.8206
|
|
|
$
|
1.0505
|
|
|
$
|
1.0881
|
|
|
$
|
1.1197
|
|
Inlet natural gas volumes (Mcf/d)
|
|
|
280,423
|
|
|
|
279,333
|
|
|
|
278,681
|
|
|
|
278,325
|
|
|
|
277,995
|
|
EBITDA ($ in millions)
|
|
$
|
41.1
|
|
|
$
|
44.6
|
|
|
$
|
46.4
|
|
|
$
|
50.4
|
|
|
$
|
54.6
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures ($ in millions)
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
Growth capital expenditures
($ in millions)
|
|
$
|
21.2
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
21.0
|
|
|
$
|
20.7
|
|
|
$
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In determining projected EBITDA for 2009 and 2010, management
used then-current estimated forward quotes for natural gas
pipeline basis differentials. In determining projected EBITDA
for 2011 through 2013, natural gas basis differentials were
based on their historical percentage of the NYMEX price. |
|
(2) |
|
NGL prices were based on forward quotes for 2009 and 2010 and
the trailing
12-month
historical correlations to crude oil as of December 31,
2008 for 2011 through 2013. |
102
Management also included in its projections a calculation of the
leverage ratio under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement based
upon the updated projected financial information.
Managements calculations showed that, assuming no
distributions were made to Hiland Partners unitholders,
Hiland Partners leverage ratio would be 5.21x at the end
of the second quarter of 2009, 6.07x at the end of the third
quarter of 2009 and 6.30x at the end of the fourth quarter of
2009, all in excess of the then maximum permissible leverage
ratio of 4.0x under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. The
projected leverage ratios were also in excess of the maximum
permissible leverage ratio of 4.75x that would be in effect upon
the
step-up
of the leverage ratio that management elected pursuant to the
provisions of the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement at the end
of the first quarter. The leverage ratio would be required to be
stepped back down to 4.0x at the end of the fourth quarter of
2009. Based on these updated projections, management estimated
that at least $95 million of equity would need to be
infused into Hiland Partners by December 31, 2009 to be in
compliance with the leverage ratio covenant.
The projections provided to each Conflicts Committee on
May 28, 2009, which Jefferies & Company and
Barclays each draw on in their fairness opinions, are summarized
below.
Summary
Projected Financial Data for Hiland Partners
(Provided on May 28, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Pricing Forward Pricing as of 5/28/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed NYMEX Gas Price(1)
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
$
|
6.20
|
|
|
$
|
7.06
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
|
$
|
7.44
|
|
Assumed NYMEX Crude Oil Price
|
|
$
|
55.90
|
|
|
$
|
70.00
|
|
|
$
|
72.95
|
|
|
$
|
75.16
|
|
|
$
|
76.43
|
|
OPIS Conway NGL Simple Average(2)
|
|
$
|
0.7646
|
|
|
$
|
0.8419
|
|
|
$
|
1.0824
|
|
|
$
|
1.1151
|
|
|
$
|
1.1340
|
|
OPIS Mont Belvieu NGL Simple Average(2)
|
|
$
|
0.8487
|
|
|
$
|
0.9494
|
|
|
$
|
1.1491
|
|
|
$
|
1.1839
|
|
|
$
|
1.2039
|
|
Inlet natural gas volumes (Mcf/d)
|
|
|
271,076
|
|
|
|
262,296
|
|
|
|
262,353
|
|
|
|
261,915
|
|
|
|
261,506
|
|
EBITDA ($ in millions)
|
|
$
|
44.9
|
|
|
$
|
48.0
|
|
|
$
|
47.9
|
|
|
$
|
50.6
|
|
|
$
|
53.9
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures ($ in millions)
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
Growth capital expenditures ($ in millions)
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
21.0
|
|
|
$
|
20.7
|
|
|
$
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In determining projected EBITDA for 2009 and 2010, management
used then-current estimated forward quotes for natural gas
pipeline basis differentials. In determining projected EBITDA
for 2011 through 2013, natural gas basis differentials were
based on their historical percentage of the NYMEX price. |
|
(2) |
|
NGL prices were based on forward quotes for 2009 and 2010 and
the trailing
12-month
historical correlations to crude oil as of April 30, 2009
for 2011 through 2013. |
As with the previous projections, management also included in
its projections a calculation of the leverage ratio under the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement based upon the updated
projected financial information. Managements calculations
showed that, assuming no distributions were made to Hiland
Partners unitholders, Hiland Partners leverage ratio
would be 5.06x at the end of the second quarter of 2009, 5.73x
at the end of the third quarter of 2009 and 5.82x at the end of
the fourth quarter of 2009, all in excess of the then maximum
permissible leverage ratio of 4.0x under the Hiland Operating
Credit Agreement. The projected leverage ratios were also in
excess of the maximum permissible leverage ratio of 4.75x that
would be in effect upon the
step-up
of the leverage ratio that management elected pursuant to the
provisions of the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement at the end
of the first quarter. The leverage ratio would be required to by
stepped back down to 4.0x at the end of the fourth quarter of
2009. Based on these updated projections, management estimated
that at least $82 million of equity would need to be
infused into Hiland Partners by December 31, 2009 to be in
compliance with the leverage ratio covenant.
103
Projections of this type are based on estimates and assumptions
that are subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies,
all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are
beyond the Hiland Companies control. They are, in general,
prepared solely for internal use in assessing strategic
direction, related capital and resource needs and allocations
and other management decisions.
Since the projections cover multiple years, such information by
its nature becomes less reliable with each successive year.
Consequently, there can be no assurance that the underlying
assumptions will prove to be accurate, that the projected
results will be realized or that actual results will not be
significantly different than projected. These projections were
prepared solely for internal use and not for publication or with
a view of complying with the published guidelines of the SEC
regarding projections or with guidelines established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for
preparation and presentation of prospective financial
information. The summary projected financial data set forth
above is included in this joint proxy statement only because
such projected financial information was provided to the
Conflicts Committees and, through Harold Hamm, to the Hamm
Continuing Investors and their financial advisors. The merger
agreements include no representations by either of the Hiland
Companies, their management or the Hamm Continuing Investors as
to this projected financial information. In light of the
uncertainties inherent in projections of this type, neither the
Hiland Companies nor the Hamm Continuing Investors or any other
person has expressed any opinion or assurance on this
information or its achievability. None of the projections
reflect any impact of the mergers.
The Hiland Companies independent registered public
accounting firm has not examined, compiled or otherwise applied
procedures to the financial projections presented herein and,
accordingly, does not express an opinion or any other form of
assurance on them.
In addition to the assumptions regarding inlet natural gas
volumes, commodity prices and capital expenditures summarized
above, managements projections are subject to a number of
additional important assumptions, certain of which include:
|
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners then current commodity hedge portfolio,
with anticipated hedge income being calculated based on the
assumed commodity pricing;
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners then current contract portfolio by
gathering system;
|
|
|
|
Operating and general and administrative expenses are escalated
at 2.5% annually;
|
|
|
|
Budgeted growth and maintenance capital expenditures for 2009,
including the construction of the North Dakota Bakken natural
gas gathering system, which was placed in-service in the second
quarter of 2009;
|
|
|
|
Unidentified growth capital expenditures in years 2010 through
2013 with an EBITDA contribution based on a six times multiple.
This EBITDA is realized one year following the incurrence of the
unidentified growth capital expenditure;
|
|
|
|
Increasing maintenance capital expenditures in years 2010
through 2013 to reflect a larger asset base;
|
|
|
|
The loss of the Badlands Gathering System cost recovery fee in
early 2011 due to cumulative throughput volumes on the Badlands
system being greater than 36 Bcf, which is in accordance
with the contract governing the Badlands Gathering System;
|
|
|
|
No non-cash realized gain or loss on derivatives or non-cash
unit based compensation expenses during the projection periods;
and
|
|
|
|
No distributions paid to Hiland Partners unitholders throughout
the forecast period.
|
Recent
Developments
Commodity
Price Update
From May 28 through June 23, 2009, crude oil and NGL prices
increased, with the prompt month NYMEX crude oil price closing
at $69.24 per barrel on June 23, 2009, an increase of
$4.16, or 6%, from May 28, 2009 and the OPIS Conway NGL
simple average price reaching $0.94 per gallon on June 23,
2009,
104
an increase of $0.13, or 16%, from May 28, 2009.
Accordingly, the combination of increasing NGL prices and
slightly declining natural gas prices during this time period
caused the fractionation spread to increase.
Hedge
Transactions
On June 26, 2009, Hiland Partners executed a series of
hedging transactions that enhances Hiland Partners 2009
cash flows and current liquidity position. These hedge
transactions involved the unwinding of a portion of net
in-the-money natural gas swaps, and the entering
into new 2010 Colorado Interstate Gas (CIG) natural
gas swaps. Hiland Partners received net proceeds of
approximately $3.2 million from the unwinding of the net
in-the-money positions, which was used to reduce
indebtedness under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
With the execution of these transactions, which will result in
an increase in Hiland Partners EBITDA for the twelve
months ending June 30, 2009 and a reduction in outstanding
debt as of June 30, 2009, together with the recent
improvement in NGLs prices, Hiland Partners expects to be in
compliance with the leverage ratio contained in the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2009. If
commodity prices do not significantly improve above the current
forward prices for the third quarter of 2009, Hiland Partners
could be in violation of the leverage ratio covenant contained
in the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement as early as
September 30, 2009 unless the ratio is amended, Hiland
Partners receives an infusion of equity capital, Hiland
Partners debt is restructured or Hiland Partners is able
to monetize additional in-the-money hedge positions.
The tables below detail the net impact of the hedge transactions
to Hiland Partners hedge portfolio:
Before
June 2009 Hedging Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Description and Production Period
|
|
(MMBtus)
|
|
|
(per MMBtu)
|
|
|
CIG Natural Gas Sold Fixed for Floating Price Swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2009 December 2009
|
|
|
1,068,000
|
|
|
$
|
7.30
|
|
January 2010 December 2010
|
|
|
2,136,000
|
|
|
$
|
8.31
|
|
After
June 2009 Hedging Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Description and Production Period
|
|
(MMBtus)
|
|
|
(per MMBtu)
|
|
|
CIG Natural Gas Sold Fixed for Floating Price Swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2009 December 2009
|
|
|
1,068,000
|
|
|
$
|
7.30
|
|
January 2010 December 2010
|
|
|
2,136,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.73
|
|
Effects
of the Mergers
Private
Ownership
If each of the merger agreements and mergers are approved by the
respective Hiland Company public unitholders and the other
conditions to the closing of each merger are either satisfied or
waived, HLND Merger Sub will be merged with and into Hiland
Partners with Hiland Partners continuing as the surviving entity
and HPGP Merger Sub will be merged with and into Hiland Holdings
with Hiland Holdings continuing as the surviving entity. As a
result of the mergers, Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings, as
the surviving entities, will be privately owned by the Hamm
Continuing Investors. For a table summarizing the equity
ownership of each surviving entity following the merger, see
Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger.
As a result of the mergers, Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings
will be privately-owned companies and there will be no public
market for their common units. Upon the completion of the
mergers, the common units
105
of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings will be delisted from the
NASDAQ Global Select Market. In addition, the registration of
the common units of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings under
Section 12 of the Exchange Act will be terminated. The
Hiland Companies will continue to file periodic reports with the
SEC to the extent required by the agreements governing the
respective companys indebtedness or applicable law.
Directors
and Management of Each Surviving Entity
It is currently contemplated that the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors and Hiland Holdings Board of Directors will consist of
Harold Hamm, Joseph L. Griffin, Matthew S. Harrison and, likely,
other individuals who have not yet been identified.
It is further contemplated that the officers of Hiland Partners
and Hiland Holdings immediately prior to the effective time of
the Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings mergers will be the
initial officers of the surviving entities.
The partnership agreement of each of Hiland Partners and Hiland
Holdings will be the partnership agreement of the respective
surviving entity following the merger, in each case, until such
time as the partnership agreement is amended.
Primary
Benefits and Detriments of the Mergers
Benefits
and Detriments to Hiland Partners Common
Unitholders
The primary benefits of the mergers to common unitholders of
Hiland Partners that will not have a continuing interest in
Hiland Partners following the Hiland Partners merger include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
The receipt by such common unitholders of $7.75 per common unit
in cash, representing a 35.0% premium over the closing market
price of Hiland Partners common units on June 1, 2009, the
day of the announcement of the execution of the Hiland Partners
merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
The avoidance of the risk associated with any possible decrease
in the future revenues and free cash flow, growth or value of
Hiland Partners following the Hiland Partners merger.
|
|
|
|
The avoidance of the risk associated with any possible breach of
the financial ratios under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
|
The primary detriments of the Hiland Partners merger to common
unitholders of Hiland Partners that will not have a continuing
interest in Hiland Partners following the Hiland Partners merger
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Such common unitholders will cease to have an interest in Hiland
Partners and, therefore, will no longer benefit from possible
increases in the future revenues and free cash flow, growth or
value of Hiland Partners or payment of distributions on Hiland
Partners common units, if any.
|
|
|
|
In general, the receipt of cash pursuant to the Hiland Partners
merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal
income tax purposes and may also be a taxable transaction under
applicable state, local and foreign tax laws. As a result, a
Hiland Partners common unitholder that receives cash in exchange
for such common unitholders common units in the Hiland
Partners merger generally will be required to recognize taxable
income, gain or loss as a result of the Hiland Partners merger
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Moreover, because a
portion (which will likely be substantial) of a common
unitholders gain or loss will be separately computed and
taxed as ordinary income, a common unitholder may recognize both
ordinary income and a capital loss as a result of the Hiland
Partners merger.
|
106
Benefits
and Detriments to Hiland Holdings Common
Unitholders
The primary benefits of the mergers to common unitholders of
Hiland Holdings that will not have a continuing interest in
Hiland Holdings following the Hiland Holdings merger include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
The receipt by such common unitholders of $2.40 per common unit
in cash, representing a 28.3% premium over the closing market
price of Hiland Holdings common units on June 1, 2009, the
day of the announcement of the execution of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
The avoidance of the risk associated with any possible decrease
in the future revenues and free cash flow, growth or value of
Hiland Holdings following the Hiland Holdings merger.
|
|
|
|
The avoidance of the risk associated with any possible Hiland
Partners breach of the financial ratios under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement.
|
The primary detriments of the Hiland Holdings merger to common
unitholders of Hiland Holdings that will not have a continuing
interest in Hiland Holdings following the Hiland Holdings merger
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Such unitholders will cease to have an interest in Hiland
Holdings and, therefore, will no longer benefit from possible
increases in the future revenues and free cash flow, growth or
value of Hiland Holdings or payment of distributions on Hiland
Holdings common units, if any.
|
|
|
|
In general, the receipt of cash pursuant to the Hiland Holdings
merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal
income tax purposes and may also be a taxable transaction under
applicable state, local and foreign tax laws. As a result, a
Hiland Holdings common unitholder that receives cash in exchange
for such common unitholders common units in the Hiland
Holdings merger generally will be required to recognize taxable
income, gain or loss as a result of the Hiland Holdings merger
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Moreover, because a
portion (which will likely be substantial) of a common
unitholders gain or loss will be separately computed and
taxed as ordinary income, a common unitholder may recognize both
ordinary income and a capital loss as a result of the Hiland
Holdings merger.
|
Benefits
and Detriments to the Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons
The primary benefits of the mergers to the Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
If the Hiland Companies successfully execute their business
strategies, the value of their equity investment could increase
because of possible increases in future revenues and cash flow,
increases in underlying value of the Hiland Companies or the
payment of distributions, if any, that would accrue to the
Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons and the Hamm Family trusts.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Companies will no longer have continued pressure to
meet quarterly forecasts set by analysts. In contrast, as
publicly-traded companies, the Hiland Companies currently face
public unitholder and investment analyst pressure to make
decisions that may produce better short term results, but which
may not over the long-term lead to a maximization of their
equity value.
|
|
|
|
The Hiland Companies will have more flexibility to change their
capital spending strategies without public market scrutiny or
analysts quarterly expectations.
|
|
|
|
The directors, officers and beneficial owners of more than 10%
of the common units of the respective Hiland Companies will be
relieved of the reporting requirements and liability for
short-swing profit recovery under Section 16 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
The Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons and the Hamm Family Trusts, as the owners of the
Hiland Companies, will become the beneficiaries of the savings
associated with the reduced filing requirements for the Hiland
Companies, which are expected by the Hamm Continuing Investors
to be approximately $1 million per year.
|
107
The primary detriments of the mergers to the Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The mergers are being undertaken during a time of significant
market and industry turmoil, and all of the risk of any possible
decrease in the revenues and cash flow, growth or value of the
Hiland Companies following the mergers will be borne by the
Combined
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons and the Hamm Family trusts.
|
|
|
|
Following the mergers, there will be no trading market for, and
substantial restrictions on the transfer of, the equity
securities of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings, as the
surviving entities.
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners is highly leveraged and following the mergers,
all risk of default under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement
will be borne by the Combined Schedule 13E-3 Filing Persons and
the Hamm Family trusts, and a capital infusion may be required
by Mr. Hamm in connection with renegotiating the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement, upon which the Hiland Companies will
remain substantially dependent as a source of liquidity.
|
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Mergers
In considering the recommendations of the Board of Directors and
Conflicts Committee of either Hiland Company, unitholders of
such Hiland Company should be aware that certain officers and
directors of the Hiland Companies have interests in the mergers
that are different from the interests of the Hiland Partners and
Hiland Holdings public unitholders, which are summarized below.
The members of the Board of Directors and Conflicts Committee of
each Hiland Company were aware of such interests in the proposed
transactions when deciding to approve either the Hiland Partners
merger or the Hiland Holdings merger, as was each Conflicts
Committee when deciding to recommend such approval. For more
information, please see Background of the
Mergers, Recommendations of the Hiland
Partners Conflicts Committee and Hiland Partners Board of
Directors; Reasons for Recommending Approval of the Merger
and Recommendations of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee and Hiland Holdings Board of Directors;
Reasons for Recommending Approval of the Merger.
Hiland
Partners Merger
Harold
Hamm and the other Hamm Continuing Investors
In connection with the Hiland Partners merger agreement, Harold
Hamm, Hiland Partners Chairman, entered into the Hiland
Partners commitment letter pursuant to which Mr. Hamm
agreed to contribute $32.0 million in cash to Parent to
fund the Hiland Partners merger consideration and estimated
expenses, less the amount of cash, if any, contributed by the
Hamm family trusts to Parent or HLND Merger Sub. The foregoing
summary of the Hiland Partners commitment letter does not
purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the copy of such commitment letter attached as an
exhibit to the
Schedule 13E-3
filed with the SEC in connection with Hiland Partners merger and
incorporated herein by reference.
Parent, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mr. Hamm, and HLND
Merger Sub also entered into the Hiland Partners support
agreement with Hiland Holdings, the general partner of Hiland
Holdings, Hiland Partners and the general partner of Hiland
Partners whereby Hiland Holdings and its general partner agreed
to (i) maintain the ownership of its 2,321,471 common units
and 3,060,000 subordinated units of Hiland Partners, which
represent approximately 37.0% and 100.0% of their respective
classes outstanding, (ii) vote its common units and
subordinated units in favor of the approval of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger, and
(iii) grant an irrevocable proxy to Parent for the purpose
of voting in favor of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and
the Hiland Partners merger as described above. Based on the cash
purchase price of $7.75 per common unit, the aggregate value of
the continued holding of the Hiland Partners common units by
Hiland Holdings is approximately $18.0 million. The
foregoing summary of the Hiland Partners support agreement does
not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the copy of such agreement attached as an exhibit
to the
Schedule 13E-3
filed with the SEC in connection with the Hiland Partners merger
and incorporated herein by reference.
108
Pursuant to the terms of the Hiland Partners partnership
agreement, any proposed merger, including the Hiland Partners
merger, must first be consented to by the general partner of
Hiland Partners before being submitted to a vote of the limited
partners of Hiland Partners. Because Hiland Holdings owns a
controlling membership interest in the general partner of Hiland
Partners, its consent was required before the Hiland Partners
merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger could be
submitted to a vote of the unitholders of Hiland Partners.
Hiland Holdings, in a written consent dated June 1, 2009,
has consented to the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the
Hiland Partners merger.
Hiland Partners provides certain services to Continental
Resources, Inc., a publicly traded exploration and production
company controlled by Harold Hamm and certain of his affiliates,
pursuant to contractual arrangements summarized under
Information Concerning the Hiland Companies
Certain Transactions between the Hiland Companies and Affiliates
of Harold Hamm. In addition, Hiland Partners leases office
space under an operating lease from an entity wholly owned by
Harold Hamm. Rents paid under these leases totaled $157,000 and
$143,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Upon consummation of the Hiland Partners merger,
these arrangements may be amended, modified or terminated.
Hiland
Partners Board of Directors
Six of the eight members of the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors serve as members of the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors. Because these persons serve as a director of each of
the Hiland Companies, they have certain duties and obligations
to the unitholders of each Hiland Company as provided in the
respective partnership agreements of the Hiland Companies.
The directors who serve on both boards of directors are: Harold
Hamm, Joseph L. Griffin, Matthew S. Harrison, Edward D. Doherty,
Michael L. Greenwood and Rayford T. Reid. Mr. Griffin also
serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of both Hiland
Companies, and Mr. Harrison serves as Chief Financial
Officer of both Hiland Companies. Shelby E. Odell resigned from
the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors on January 21, 2009.
Accordingly, during the consideration of the Hiland Partners
merger by the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, no member of
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee also served on the
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors.
Mr. Odell and John T. McNabb, II, who compose the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, each received compensation
of $30,000 in connection with the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committees consideration of the Hiland Partners merger.
The compensation paid to each of the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee members was in addition to the compensation they
receive for serving on the Hiland Partners Board of Directors
and any other committees of the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors. These payments were not predicated on any result of
the deliberations of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee.
It is expected that Messrs. Hamm, Griffin and Harrison will
continue as directors of the surviving company after the
effective time of the Hiland Partners merger. In addition, it is
expected that, following the Hiland Holdings merger,
Messrs. Hamm, Griffin and Harrison will continue as
directors of the surviving company after the effective time of
the Hiland Holdings merger.
Rayford T. Reid, a member of the Board of Directors of each of
the Hiland Companies, recused himself from consideration and
voting on the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland
Partners merger due to his professional relationship with
Mr. Hamm. Mr. Reid has historically provided
Mr. Hamm and the Hamm family trusts with financial advisory
services, including in connection with evaluating strategic
alternatives with respect to the Hiland Companies.
Hiland
Partners Management
Certain members of the Hiland Partners management team,
including Chief Executive Officer Joseph L. Griffin and Chief
Financial Officer Matthew S. Harrison, have been offered
continued employment with the surviving entity after the
effective time of the Hiland Partners merger and may enter into
or be provided new employment, retention and compensation
arrangements (though no such arrangements have been proposed or
109
agreed to). In addition, Mr. Griffin serves as Chief
Executive Officer of Hiland Holdings, and Mr. Harrison
serves as Chief Financial Officer of Hiland Holdings and as Vice
President and Secretary of Parent and HLND Merger Sub.
While neither Mr. Griffin nor Mr. Harrison have any
ownership interest in Parent or HLND Merger Sub, the 5,000
phantom units in Hiland Partners currently issued and
outstanding to each of Mr. Griffin and Mr. Harrison
under the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan will
remain outstanding following consummation of the Hiland Partners
merger, giving Mr. Griffin and Mr. Harrison a
continuing ownership interest in Hiland Partners. For additional
information, please see Treatment of Equity
Awards of Directors and Officers.
Hiland
Partners Director and Officer Insurance
The Hiland Partners merger agreement provides, with respect to
indemnification of directors and officers, that the partnership
agreement of the surviving entity may not be amended, repealed
or otherwise modified after the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger in any manner that would adversely affect the
rights thereunder of the persons who at any time prior to the
effective time of the Hiland Partners merger were identified as
prospective indemnitees under the Hiland Partners partnership
agreement in respect of actions or omissions occurring at or
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger
(including the transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners
merger agreement).
For a period of six years after the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement, Parent and the general partner of
Hiland Partners shall, and Parent and the general partner of
Hiland Partners shall cause the surviving entity (and its
successors or assigns) to, maintain officers and
directors liability insurance covering each person who is
immediately prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners
merger agreement, or has been at any time prior to the effective
time of the Hiland Partners merger, an officer or director of
any of the Hiland Parties or their subsidiaries and each person
who immediately prior to the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger is serving or prior to the effective time of the
Hiland Partners merger has served at the request of any of the
Hiland Parties or their subsidiaries as a director, officer,
trustee or fiduciary of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust, pension or other employee benefit plan of the
Hiland Parties or their subsidiaries who are or at any time
prior to the effective time were covered by the existing
officers and directors liability insurance
applicable to the Hiland Parties or their subsidiaries on terms
substantially no less advantageous to the indemnified persons
described in this paragraph than such existing insurance with
respect to acts or omissions, or alleged acts or omissions,
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger
(whether claims, actions or other proceedings relating thereto
are commenced, asserted or claimed before or after the effective
time of the Hiland Partners merger).
Hiland Partners shall cause (and Parent, following the closing
of the Hiland Partners merger, shall continue to cause) coverage
to be extended under the existing officers and
directors liability insurance applicable to the Hiland
Parties or their subsidiaries by obtaining a six-year
tail policy on terms and conditions no less
advantageous than the existing officers and
directors liability insurance, and such tail
policy shall satisfy the requirements summarized in this
section. In no event, however, will Parent be required to spend
more than 250% of the last annual premium paid by the Hiland
Parties and their subsidiaries prior to the signing date of the
Hiland Partners merger agreement per policy year of coverage
under such tail policy. If the cost per policy year
of such insurance exceeds 250% of the last annual premium,
Parent shall purchase as much coverage per policy year as
reasonably obtainable for the amount equal to 250% of the last
annual premium.
The indemnification and insurance provisions of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement are more fully described under
The Hiland Partners Merger Agreement Other
Covenants and Agreements Indemnification and
Insurance.
110
Treatment
of Equity Awards of Directors and Officers
Upon consummation of the Hiland Partners merger, the outstanding
equity awards under the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive
Plan will be subject to the following treatment:
|
|
|
|
|
restricted common units held by non-employee members of the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors will immediately vest and
automatically convert into the right to receive the Hiland
Partners merger consideration;
|
|
|
|
all other restricted common units, phantom units and unit option
awards issued pursuant to the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan that remain outstanding as of the effective time
of the Hiland Partners merger will remain outstanding in
accordance with their respective terms as equity awards in the
surviving entity in the merger.
|
Following the closing of the Hiland Partners merger, the board
of directors of the surviving entity may amend the terms of
outstanding equity-based awards or other terms of the long-term
incentive plan to align such terms with the privately-held
structure of the surviving entity.
Equity
Interests in Hiland Partners, Parent and HLND Merger
Sub
The following table sets forth the current beneficial ownership
of Mr. Hamm, the other Hamm Continuing Investors, their
respective affiliates and the directors and officers of Hiland
Partners in the equity of Hiland Partners as of the date of this
joint proxy statement and their contemplated beneficial
ownership in the surviving entity after the effective time of
the Hiland Partners merger.
Equity
Interests of Hamm Continuing Investors, Directors and Officers
in Hiland Partners (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
Restricted Common Units
|
|
|
Phantom Units
|
|
|
Unit Options
|
|
|
Conflicts
|
|
|
Total Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cashed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cashed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cashed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cashed
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Received
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Out
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Out
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Out
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Out
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
in Merger
|
|
|
Harold Hamm(2)
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
2,321,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Joseph L. Griffin
|
|
Director, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,379
|
|
Matthew S. Harrison
|
|
Director, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,375
|
|
Edward D. Doherty
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,750
|
|
Michael L. Greenwood
|
|
Director
|
|
|
11,041
|
|
|
|
11,041
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
103,005
|
|
John T. McNabb, II
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
61,000
|
|
Shelby E. Odell
|
|
Director
|
|
|
12,750
|
|
|
|
12,750
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
146,250
|
|
Rayford T. Reid
|
|
Director
|
|
|
9,568
|
|
|
|
9,658
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,287
|
|
Dr. David L. Boren(3)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,687
|
|
Kent C. Christopherson
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Robert W. Shain(4)
|
|
Chief Commercial Officer
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,698
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include subordinated units, incentive distribution
rights, or general partner interest, each of which are owned
directly or indirectly by Hiland Holdings and beneficially owned
by Mr. Hamm and will not receive any consideration in the
Hiland Partners merger. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents common units held by Hiland Holdings. Mr. Hamm
indirectly owns 100% of Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC, the
general partner of Hiland Holdings GP, LP. Accordingly,
Mr. Hamm is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the
2,321,471 Hiland Partners common units and 3,060,000 Hiland
Partners subordinated units held by Hiland Holdings GP, LP. |
|
(3) |
|
Dr. Boren resigned from the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors on March 13, 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Shain resigned from his position as Chief Commercial
Officer of each of the Hiland Companies effective March 31,
2009. |
111
Pro Forma
Equity Interests in Surviving Entity (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
% of Class
|
|
|
Phantom Units
|
|
|
Unit Options
|
|
|
Harold Hamm(2)
|
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bert Mackie, as trustee of the Trusts(3)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph L. Griffin
|
|
|
Director, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew S. Harrison
|
|
|
Director, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent C. Christopherson
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W. Shain(4)
|
|
|
Chief Commercial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include subordinated units, incentive distribution
rights, or general partner interest, each of which are owned
directly or indirectly by Hiland Holdings and beneficially owned
by Mr. Hamm. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Hamm is the sole member of Parent. Accordingly,
Mr. Hamm is deemed to be the beneficial owner of
the common units of the surviving
entity held by Parent. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Mackie is the trustee of the Harold Hamm DST Trust and
the Harold Hamm HJ Trust. Accordingly, he is deemed to be the
beneficial owner of the
and common units of the surviving
entity, respectively, held by them. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Shain resigned from his position as Chief Commercial
Officer of each of the Hiland Companies effective March 31,
2009. |
Equity
Interests in Hiland Holdings
In addition to the equity interests of Mr. Hamm, the other
Hamm Continuing Investors, their respective affiliates and the
directors and officers of Hiland Partners in Hiland Partners
summarized in the tables above, certain of those persons also
have equity interests in Hiland Holdings, which are summarized
in the tables included in Interests of Certain Persons in
the Mergers Hiland Holdings Merger
Equity Interests in Hiland Holdings, Parent and HPGP Merger
Sub.
Hiland
Holdings Merger
Harold
Hamm and the other Hamm Continuing Investors
In connection with the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, Harold
Hamm, Hiland Holdings Chairman, entered into the Hiland
Holdings commitment letter pursuant to which Mr. Hamm
agreed to contribute $21.2 million in cash to Parent to
fund the Hiland Holdings merger consideration and estimated
expenses, less the amount of cash, if any, contributed by the
Hamm family trusts to Parent or HPGP Merger Sub. The foregoing
summary of the Hiland Holdings commitment letter does not
purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the copy of the Hiland Holdings commitment letter
attached as an exhibit to the
Schedule 13E-3
filed with the SEC in connection with the Hiland Holdings merger
and incorporated herein by reference.
Mr. Hamm, Continental Gas, and Bert Mackie, as trustee of
the Hamm family trusts, also entered into the Hiland Holdings
support agreement with Hiland Holdings and the general partner
of Hiland Holdings whereby Mr. Hamm, Continental Gas and
Mr. Mackie each agreed to (i) maintain their
respective ownership of an aggregate 13,138,052 Hiland Holdings
common units, which represent approximately 60.8% of the common
units outstanding, (ii) vote their respective Hiland
Holdings common units in favor of the approval of the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger, and
(iii) grant an irrevocable proxy to Hiland Holdings for the
purpose of voting in favor of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger as described above.
Based on the cash purchase price of $2.40 per common unit, the
aggregate value of the continued holding of the Hiland Holdings
common units by Mr. Hamm, Continental
112
Gas and the Hamm family trusts is approximately
$31.5 million. The foregoing summary of the Hiland Holdings
support agreement does not purport to be complete and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the copy of such
agreement attached as an exhibit to the
Schedule 13E-3
filed with the SEC in connection with the Hiland Holdings merger
and incorporated herein by reference.
Hiland Holdings leases office space under an operating lease
from an entity wholly owned by Harold Hamm. Rents paid under
these leases totaled $157,000 and $143,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Upon consummation of
the Hiland Holdings merger, Mr. Hamm or his affiliates may
amend, modify or terminate this operating lease.
Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors
Six of the eight members of the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors serve as members of the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors. Because these persons serve as a director of each of
the Hiland Companies, they have certain duties and obligations
to the unitholders of each Hiland Company as provided in the
respective partnership agreements of the Hiland Companies.
The directors who serve on both boards of directors are: Harold
Hamm, Joseph L. Griffin, Matthew S. Harrison, Edward D. Doherty,
Michael L. Greenwood and Rayford T. Reid. Mr. Griffin also
serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of both Hiland
Companies, and Mr. Harrison serves as Chief Financial
Officer of both Hiland Companies. No member of the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee also served on the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors.
Dr. Cheryl L. Evans and Dr. Bobby B. Lyle, who compose
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee, each received
compensation of $30,000 in connection with the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committees consideration of the Hiland Holdings
merger. The compensation paid to each of the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee members was in addition to the compensation
they receive for serving on the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors and any other committees of the Hiland Holdings Board
of Directors. These payments were not predicated on any result
of the deliberations of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee.
It is expected that Messrs. Hamm, Griffin and Harrison will
continue as directors of the surviving company after the
effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger. In addition, it is
expected that, following the Hiland Holdings merger,
Messrs. Hamm, Griffin and Harrison will continue as
directors of the surviving company after the effective time of
the Hiland Holdings merger.
Rayford T. Reid, a member of the Board of Directors of each of
the Hiland Companies, recused himself from consideration and
voting on Hiland Holdings merger agreement and Hiland Partners
merger due to his professional relationship with Mr. Hamm.
Mr. Reid has historically provided Mr. Hamm and the
Hamm family trusts with financial advisory services, including
in connection with evaluating strategic alternatives with
respect to the Hiland Companies.
Hiland
Holdings Management
Certain members of the Hiland Holdings management team,
including Chief Executive Officer Joseph L. Griffin and Chief
Financial Officer Matthew S. Harrison, have been offered
continued employment with the surviving entity after the
effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger and may enter into
or be provided new employment, retention and compensation
arrangements (though no such arrangements have been proposed or
agreed to). In addition, Mr. Griffin serves as Chief
Executive Officer of Hiland Holdings, and Mr. Harrison
serves as Chief Financial Officer of Hiland Holdings and as Vice
President and Secretary of Parent, HPGP Merger Sub and
Continental Gas.
Neither Mr. Griffin nor Mr. Harrison have any
ownership interest in Parent or HPGP Merger Sub.
Hiland
Holdings Director and Officer Insurance
The Hiland Holdings merger agreement provides, with respect to
indemnification of directors and officers, that the partnership
agreement of the surviving entity may not be amended, repealed
or otherwise modified
113
after the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger in any
manner that would adversely affect the rights thereunder of the
persons who at any time prior to the effective time of the
Hiland Holdings merger were identified as prospective
indemnitees under the Hiland Holdings partnership agreement in
respect of actions or omissions occurring at or prior to the
effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger (including the
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement).
For a period of six years after the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement, Parent and the general partner of
Hiland Holdings shall, and Parent and the general partner of
Hiland Holdings shall cause the surviving entity (and its
successors or assigns) to, maintain officers and
directors liability insurance covering each person who is
immediately prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement, or has been at any time prior to the effective
time of the Hiland Holdings merger, an officer or director of
any of the Holdings Parties or their subsidiaries and each
person who immediately prior to the effective time of the Hiland
Holdings merger is serving or prior to the effective time of the
Hiland Holdings merger has served at the request of any of the
Holdings Parties or their subsidiaries as a director, officer,
trustee or fiduciary of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust, pension or other employee benefit plan of the
Holdings Parties or their subsidiaries who are or at any time
prior to the effective time were covered by the existing
officers and directors liability insurance
applicable to the Holdings Parties or their subsidiaries on
terms substantially no less advantageous to the indemnified
persons described in this paragraph than such existing insurance
with respect to acts or omissions, or alleged acts or omissions,
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger
(whether claims, actions or other proceedings relating thereto
are commenced, asserted or claimed before or after the effective
time of the Hiland Holdings merger).
Hiland Holdings shall cause (and Parent, following the closing
of the Hiland Holdings merger, shall continue to cause) coverage
to be extended under the existing officers and
directors liability insurance applicable to the Holdings
Parties or their subsidiaries by obtaining a six-year
tail policy on terms and conditions no less
advantageous than the existing officers and
directors liability insurance, and such tail
policy shall satisfy the requirements summarized in this
section. In no event, however, will Parent be required to spend
more than 250% of the last annual premium paid by the Holdings
Parties and their subsidiaries prior to the signing date of the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement per policy year of coverage
under such tail policy. If the cost per policy year
of such insurance exceeds 250% of the last annual premium,
Parent shall purchase as much coverage per policy year as
reasonably obtainable for the amount equal to 250% of the last
annual premium.
The indemnification and insurance provisions of the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement are more fully described under
The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement Other
Covenants and Agreements Indemnification and
Insurance.
Treatment
of Equity Awards of Directors and Officers
Upon consummation of the Hiland Holdings merger, the outstanding
equity awards under the Hiland Holdings, LP Long-Term Incentive
Plan will be subject to the following treatment:
|
|
|
|
|
restricted common units held by non-employee members of the
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors will immediately vest and
automatically convert into the right to receive the Hiland
Holdings merger consideration;
|
|
|
|
all other restricted common units, phantom units and unit option
awards issued pursuant to the Hiland Holdings, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan that remain outstanding as of the effective time
of the Hiland Holdings merger will remain outstanding in
accordance with their respective terms as equity awards in the
surviving entity in the merger.
|
Following the closing of the Hiland Holdings merger, the board
of directors of the surviving entity may amend the terms of
outstanding equity-based awards or other terms of the long-term
incentive plan to align such terms with the privately-held
structure of the surviving entity.
114
Equity
Interests in Hiland Holdings, Parent and HPGP Merger
Sub
The following table sets forth the current beneficial ownership
of Mr. Hamm, the other Hamm Continuing Investors, their
respective affiliates and the directors and officers of Hiland
Holdings in the equity of Hiland Holdings as of the date of this
joint proxy statement and their contemplated beneficial
ownership in the surviving entity after the effective time of
the Hiland Holdings merger.
Equity
Interests of Hamm Continuing Investors, Directors and Officers
in Hiland Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
Common Units
|
|
Phantom Units
|
|
Unit Options
|
|
Conflicts
|
|
Total Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cashed
|
|
|
|
Cashed
|
|
|
|
Cashed
|
|
|
|
Cashed
|
|
Committee
|
|
Received
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Owned
|
|
Out
|
|
Owned
|
|
Out
|
|
Owned
|
|
Out
|
|
Owned
|
|
Out
|
|
Compensation
|
|
in Merger
|
|
Harold Hamm(1)
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
8,540,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bert Mackie, as trustee of the Trusts
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
4,597,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Joseph L. Griffin
|
|
Director, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Matthew S. Harrison
|
|
Director, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Edward D. Doherty
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,800
|
|
Dr. Cheryl L. Evans
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
40,800
|
|
Michael L. Greenwood
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,600
|
|
Dr. Bobby B. Lyle
|
|
Director
|
|
|
61,654
|
|
|
|
61,654
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
182,170
|
|
Shelby E. Odell(2)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,600
|
|
Rayford T. Reid
|
|
Director
|
|
|
26,750
|
|
|
|
26,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
68,400
|
|
Kent C. Christopherson
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Robert W. Shain(3)
|
|
Chief Commercial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Hamm owns approximately 90.7% of Continental Gas.
Accordingly, Mr. Hamm is deemed to be the beneficial owner
of the 8,481,350 Hiland Holdings common units held by
Continental Gas. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Odell resigned from the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors effective January 21, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Shain resigned from his position as Chief Commercial
Officer of each of the Hiland Companies effective March 31,
2009. |
Pro Forma
Equity Interests in Surviving Entity (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
|
Name
|
|
Current Position
|
|
Units
|
|
% of Class
|
|
Harold Hamm(2)
|
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Bert Mackie, as trustee of the Trusts(3)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Joseph L. Griffin
|
|
|
Director, Chief
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew S. Harrison
|
|
|
Director, Chief
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent C. Christopherson
|
|
|
Chief Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W. Shain(4)
|
|
|
Chief Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include the 0% non-economic general partner interest
which is beneficially owned by Mr. Hamm. No restricted
common units, phantom units or unit options are expected to be
outstanding, so they are not reflected in the above table. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Hamm is the sole member of Parent. Accordingly,
Mr. Hamm is deemed to be the beneficial owner of
the
common units of the surviving entity held by Parent.
Mr. Hamm also owns approximately |
115
|
|
|
|
|
90.7% of the common stock of Continental Gas. Accordingly,
Mr. Hamm is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the
8,481,350 common units of the surviving entity held by
Continental Gas. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Mackie is the trustee of the Harold Hamm DST Trust and
the Harold Hamm HJ Trust. Accordingly, he is deemed to be the
beneficial owner of
the
and
common units of the surviving entity, respectively, held by them. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Shain resigned from his position as Chief Commercial Officer
of each of the Hiland Companies effective March 31, 2009. |
Equity
Interests in Hiland Partners
In addition to the equity interests of Mr. Hamm, the other
Hamm Continuing Investors, their respective affiliates and the
directors and officers of Hiland Holdings in Hiland Holdings
summarized in the tables above, certain of those persons also
have equity interests in Hiland Partners, which are summarized
in the tables included in Interests of Certain Persons in
the Mergers Hiland Partners Merger
Equity Interests in Hiland Partners, Parent and HLND Merger
Sub.
Material
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the Hiland Partners merger and the
Hiland Holdings merger that may be relevant to current Hiland
Partners common unitholders and Hiland Holdings common
unitholders. This discussion is based upon the current
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Internal Revenue Code), existing final Treasury
regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code (the
Treasury Regulations), administrative rulings and
judicial decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to
change, possibly with retroactive effect. Changes in these
authorities may cause the actual tax consequences of the mergers
to vary substantially from the tax consequences described below.
Neither Hiland Partners nor Hiland Holdings has sought a ruling
from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS) with respect to any of the tax matters
discussed below, and the IRS would not be precluded from taking
positions contrary to those described herein. As a result, no
assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with all of the
tax characterizations and the tax consequences described below.
The discussion does not purport to be a complete description of
all U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Hiland
Partners merger or the Hiland Holdings merger to the common
unitholders of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings. Moreover,
the discussion focuses on common unitholders of Hiland Partners
and Hiland Holdings who are individual citizens or residents of
the United States and has only limited application to
corporations, estates, trusts, and other common unitholders
subject to specialized tax treatment, such as tax-exempt
institutions, foreign persons, individual retirement accounts
(IRAs), real estate investment trusts (REITs), mutual funds,
dealers in securities or currencies, traders in securities that
have elected to use the
mark-to-market
method of accounting for their securities, or persons that hold
Hiland Partners common units or Hiland Holdings common units as
part of a hedge, straddle or conversion transaction or those who
received their common units of Hiland Partners or Hiland
Holdings as compensation. Also, this discussion assumes that
Hiland Partners common units and Hiland Holdings common units
are held as capital assets at the time of the mergers.
Each holder of Hiland Partners common units or Hiland
Holdings common units should consult its own tax advisor
regarding the tax consequences of the Hiland Partners merger or
the Hiland Holdings merger to such holder in such holders
particular situation, including any tax consequences that may
arise under the laws of any state, local or foreign taxing
jurisdiction and the possible effects of changes in
U.S. federal or other tax laws. Further, it is the
responsibility of each common unitholder to file all state,
local and foreign, as well as U.S. federal, tax returns
that may be required to be filed by such common unitholder.
116
Tax
Consequences of the Hiland Partners Merger
Tax
Treatment as a Taxable Disposition
If the Hiland Partners merger is completed as contemplated by
the Hiland Partners merger agreement, HLND Merger Sub will be
merged with and into Hiland Partners and holders of common units
of Hiland Partners (other than the Hiland Partners rollover
common unitholders) will receive the merger consideration of
$7.75 in cash for each common unit of Hiland Partners. For
U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Hiland Partners
merger will be treated as a taxable disposition by the holders
of common units of Hiland Partners (other than the Hiland
Partners rollover common unitholders) of their Hiland Partners
common units.
Recognition
of Gain or Loss
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a holder
of Hiland Partners common units receiving the Hiland Partners
merger consideration will recognize gain or loss in an amount
equal to the difference, if any, between the amount realized by
that Hiland Partners common unitholder and that Hiland Partners
common unitholders adjusted tax basis in its Hiland
Partners common units.
Generally, a Hiland Partners common unitholders initial
tax basis for its common units will have been the amount he paid
for the common units plus its share of Hiland Partners
nonrecourse liabilities. That basis will have been increased by
its share of Hiland Partners income and by any increases
in its share of Hiland Partners nonrecourse liabilities.
That basis will have been decreased, but not below zero, by
distributions from Hiland Partners to the common unitholder, by
the common unitholders share of Hiland Partners
losses, by any decreases in its share of Hiland Partners
nonrecourse liabilities, and by its share of Hiland
Partners expenditures that are not deductible in computing
taxable income and are not required to be capitalized. A Hiland
Partners common unitholder has no share of Hiland Partners
debt that is recourse to Hiland Partners general partner,
but has a share (generally based on its share of Hiland
Partners profits) of Hiland Partners nonrecourse
liabilities.
A common unitholders amount realized will be measured by
the sum of the Hiland Partners merger consideration received by
him plus its share of Hiland Partners nonrecourse
liabilities. Because the amount realized includes a common
unitholders share of Hiland Partners nonrecourse
liabilities, the gain recognized could result in a tax liability
in excess of the cash received as the Hiland Partners merger
consideration. However, because of the prices at which the
holders of Hiland Partners common units have purchased such
common units, it is not anticipated that existing Hiland
Partners common unitholders will recognize additional taxable
gain as a result of their allocation of such nonrecourse
liabilities of Hiland Partners.
Prior distributions from Hiland Partners to a common unitholder
in excess of cumulative net taxable income for a common unit
that decreased the common unitholders tax basis in that
common unit will, in effect, become taxable income if the amount
realized is greater than the common unitholders tax basis
in that common unit, even if the Hiland Partners merger
consideration received is less than its original cost.
Except as noted below, gain or loss recognized by a common
unitholder (other than a dealer in common units) as
a result of the Hiland Partners merger will generally be taxable
as capital gain or loss. Capital gain recognized by an
individual with respect to common units held for more than one
year will generally be taxed at a maximum U.S. federal
income tax rate of 15%. However, a portion (which will likely be
substantial) of a common unitholders gain or loss will be
separately computed and taxed as ordinary income or loss under
Section 751 of the Internal Revenue Code to the extent
attributable to unrealized receivables or to
inventory items owned by Hiland Partners. The term
unrealized receivables includes potential recapture
items, including depreciation recapture. Ordinary income
attributable to unrealized receivables, inventory items and
depreciation recapture may exceed net taxable gain realized upon
the sale of a common unit and may be recognized even if there is
a net taxable loss realized on the sale of a common unit. Thus,
a common unitholder may recognize both ordinary income and a
capital loss upon a sale of common units. Net capital losses may
offset capital gains and up to $3,000 of ordinary income in the
case of individuals, and may only be used to offset capital
gains in the case of corporations.
117
The IRS has ruled that a partner that acquires interests in a
partnership in separate transactions must combine those
interests and maintain a single adjusted tax basis for all those
interests. Treasury Regulations under Section 1223 of the
Internal Revenue Code allow a selling common unitholder that can
identify common units transferred with an ascertainable holding
period to elect to use the actual holding period of the common
units transferred. A common unitholder with common units
purchased in separate transactions is urged to consult its tax
advisor as to the possible consequences of the IRS ruling and
application of the Treasury Regulations.
Limitations
on Deductibility of Losses
A common unitholders ability to deduct its allocable share
of Hiland Partners losses is limited to the tax basis in
its Hiland Partners common units and, in the case of an
individual, estate, trust, or corporate common unitholder (if
more than 50% of the value of the corporate common
unitholders stock is owned directly or indirectly by or
for five or fewer individuals or some tax-exempt organizations)
to the amount for which the common unitholder is considered to
be at risk with respect to Hiland Partners
activities, if that amount is less than its tax basis. A common
unitholder subject to these limitations must recapture losses
deducted in previous years to the extent that distributions
cause its at-risk amount to be less than zero at the end of any
taxable year. Losses disallowed to a common unitholder or
recaptured as a result of these limitations will carry forward
and will be allowable as a deduction to the extent that its
at-risk amount is subsequently increased, provided such losses
do not exceed such common unitholders tax basis in its
common units. Upon the taxable disposition of a common unit, any
gain recognized by a common unitholder can be offset by losses
that were previously suspended by the at-risk limitation but may
not be offset by losses suspended by the basis limitation. Any
loss previously suspended by the at-risk limitation in excess of
that gain would no longer be utilizable.
In general, a common unitholder is at risk to the extent of the
tax basis of its Hiland Partners common units, excluding any
portion of that basis attributable to its share of Hiland
Partners nonrecourse liabilities, reduced by (i) any
portion of that basis representing amounts otherwise protected
against loss because of a guarantee, stop loss agreement or
other similar arrangement and (ii) any amount of money he
borrows to acquire or hold its common units, if the lender of
those borrowed funds owns an interest in Hiland Partners or
Hiland Holdings, is related to the common unitholder, or can
look only to the common units for repayment. A common
unitholders at-risk amount increases or decreases as the
tax basis of the common unitholders common units increases
or decreases, other than as a result of increases or decreases
in its share of Hiland Partners nonrecourse liabilities.
In addition to the basis and at-risk limitations on the
deductibility of losses, the passive loss limitations generally
provide that individuals, estates, trusts, and some closely-held
corporations and personal service corporations can deduct losses
from passive activities (which are generally trade or business
activities in which the taxpayer does not materially
participate) only to the extent of the taxpayers income
from those passive activities. The passive loss limitations are
applied separately with respect to each publicly traded
partnership. Consequently, in some circumstances, a Hiland
Partners common unitholder may have suspended passive activity
losses attributable to its allocations of income and loss from
Hiland Partners. As a result of such common unitholders
disposition of its entire interest in Hiland Partners pursuant
to the Hiland Partners merger and the Hiland Holdings merger,
the common unitholder would generally be entitled to deduct such
losses in full. However, the passive loss limitations are
applied after other applicable limitations on deductions,
including the at-risk rules and the basis limitations which may
otherwise prevent the deduction of such passive activity losses.
Non-U.S.
Holders of Hiland Partners Common Units
A
non-U.S. common
unitholder that receives the Hiland Partners merger
consideration in exchange for its Hiland Partners common unit
will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain
realized from the sale or disposition of that common unit to the
extent such gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade
or business of the foreign common unitholder. Under a ruling
published by the IRS, interpreting the scope of
effectively connected income, a foreign common
unitholder of Hiland Partners would be considered to be engaged
in a
118
trade or business in the United States by virtue of the
U.S. activities of Hiland Partners, and part or all of that
common unitholders gain would be effectively connected
with that common unitholders indirect U.S. trade or
business. Moreover, under the Foreign Investment in Real
Property Tax Act, a foreign common unitholder generally will be
subject to U.S. federal income tax upon the sale or
disposition of a common unit if (i) he owned (directly or
constructively, applying certain attribution rules) more than 5%
of the Hiland Partners common units at any time during the
five-year period ending on the date of such disposition and
(ii) 50% or more of the fair market value of all of Hiland
Partners assets consisted of U.S. real property
interests at any time during the shorter of the period during
which such common unitholder held the common units or the
5-year
period ending on the date of disposition. Currently, more than
50% of Hiland Partners assets consist of U.S. real
property interests. Therefore, foreign common unitholders may be
subject to U.S. federal income tax on their gain resulting
from the Hiland Partners merger.
Constructive
Termination
Hiland Partners will be considered to have terminated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes if, within a twelve-month
period, there are sales or exchanges of interests in Hiland
Partners which, in the aggregate, constitute 50% or more of the
total interests in Hiland Partners capital and profits.
For purposes of measuring whether the 50% threshold is reached,
multiple sales of the same interest are counted only once. While
the sales and exchanges resulting from the Hiland Partners
merger and the Hiland Holdings merger are not anticipated to
cause a constructive termination of the Hiland Partners
partnership, it is possible that, when aggregated with prior and
subsequent transfers of non publicly-held interests in Hiland
Holding or Hiland Partners within a twelve-month period, the
aggregate interests transferred may constitute 50% or more of
the total interests in Hiland Partners capital and
profits, causing a constructive termination of the Hiland
Partners partnership. A constructive termination results in the
closing of Hiland Partners taxable year for all common
unitholders. In the case of a common unitholder reporting on a
taxable year other than a fiscal year ending December 31,
the closing of Hiland Partners taxable year may result in
such common unitholders share of the Hiland Partners
taxable income or loss for more than twelve months being
includable in its taxable income for the year of termination.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
Payment of the cash consideration with respect to the Hiland
Partners merger may be subject to information reporting and
backup withholding at the applicable rate (currently 28%),
unless the holder of Hiland Partners common units properly
certifies its taxpayer identification number or otherwise
establishes an exemption from backup withholding and complies
with all other applicable requirements of the backup withholding
rules. These requirements will be set forth in the letter of
transmittal and should be carefully reviewed by each holder of
Hiland Partners common units. Backup withholding is not an
additional tax. Any amounts so withheld may be allowed as a
refund or a credit against such common unitholders
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that
the required information is properly and timely furnished to the
IRS.
Tax
Consequences of the Hiland Holdings Merger
Tax
Treatment as a Taxable Disposition
If the Hiland Holdings merger is completed as contemplated by
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, HPGP Merger Sub will be
merged with and into Hiland Holdings and holders of common units
of Hiland Holdings (other than the Hiland Holdings rollover
common unitholders) will receive the merger consideration of
$2.40 in cash for each common unit of Hiland Holdings. For
U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Hiland Holdings
merger will be treated as a taxable disposition by the holders
of common units of Hiland Holdings (other than the Hiland
Holdings rollover common unitholders) of their Hiland Holdings
common units.
Recognition
of Gain or Loss
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a holder
of Hiland Holdings common units receiving the Hiland Holdings
merger consideration will recognize gain or loss in an amount
equal to the difference, if any,
119
between the amount realized by that Hiland Holdings common
unitholder and that Hiland Holdings common unitholders
adjusted tax basis in its Hiland Holdings common units.
Generally, a Hiland Holdings common unitholders initial
tax basis for its common units will have been the amount he paid
for the common units plus its share of Hiland Holdings
nonrecourse liabilities. That basis will have been increased by
its share of Hiland Holdings income and by any increases
in its share of Hiland Holdings nonrecourse liabilities.
That basis will have been decreased, but not below zero, by
distributions from Hiland Holdings to the common unitholder, by
the common unitholders share of Hiland Holdings
losses, by any decreases in its share of Hiland Holdings
nonrecourse liabilities, and by its share of Hiland
Holdings expenditures that are not deductible in computing
taxable income and are not required to be capitalized. A Hiland
Holdings common unitholder has no share of Hiland Holdings
debt that is recourse to Hiland Holdings general partner,
but has a share (generally based on its share of Hiland
Holdings profits) of Hiland Holdings nonrecourse
liabilities.
A common unitholders amount realized will be measured by
the sum of the Hiland Holdings merger consideration received by
him plus its share of Hiland Holdings nonrecourse
liabilities. Because the amount realized includes a common
unitholders share of Hiland Holdings nonrecourse
liabilities, the gain recognized could result in a tax liability
in excess of the cash received as the Hiland Holdings merger
consideration. However, because of the prices at which the
holders of Hiland Holdings common units have purchased such
common units, it is not anticipated that existing Hiland
Holdings common unitholders will recognize additional taxable
gain as a result of their allocation of such nonrecourse
liabilities of Hiland Holdings.
Prior distributions from Hiland Holdings to a common unitholder
in excess of cumulative net taxable income for a common unit
that decreased the common unitholders tax basis in that
common unit will, in effect, become taxable income if the amount
realized is greater than the common unitholders tax basis
in that common unit, even if the Hiland Holdings merger
consideration received is less than its original cost.
Except as noted below, gain or loss recognized by a common
unitholder (other than a dealer in common units) as
a result of the Hiland Holdings merger will generally be taxable
as capital gain or loss. Capital gain recognized by an
individual with respect to common units held for more than one
year will generally be taxed at a maximum U.S. federal
income tax rate of 15%. However, a portion (which will likely be
substantial) of a common unitholders gain or loss will be
separately computed and taxed as ordinary income or loss under
Section 751 of the Internal Revenue Code to the extent
attributable to unrealized receivables or to
inventory items owned by Hiland Holdings or Hiland
Partners. The term unrealized receivables includes
potential recapture items, including depreciation recapture.
Ordinary income attributable to unrealized receivables,
inventory items and depreciation recapture may exceed net
taxable gain realized upon the sale of a common unit and may be
recognized even if there is a net taxable loss realized on the
sale of a common unit. Thus, a common unitholder may recognize
both ordinary income and a capital loss upon a sale of common
units. Net capital losses may offset capital gains and up to
$3,000 of ordinary income, in the case of individuals, and may
only be used to offset capital gains in the case of corporations.
In response to recent public offerings of interests in the
management operations of private equity funds and hedge funds,
members of Congress have considered substantive changes to the
Internal Revenue Code that could change the characterization of
certain types of income received from partnerships and upon the
sale of interests in certain types of partnerships. In
particular, one proposal re-characterizes certain income and
gain received with respect to investment service
partnership interests as ordinary income for the
performance of services. As such proposal is currently
interpreted, a significant portion of Hiland Holdings
interest in Hiland Partners may be viewed as an investment
service partnership interest. Therefore, if applied
retroactively to taxable periods that include the closing of
each Hiland Company merger, this proposal could cause
substantially all the gain recognized by common unitholders of
Hiland Holdings to be treated as ordinary income. We are unable
to predict whether this proposed legislation, or any other
proposals will ultimately be enacted.
The IRS has ruled that a partner that acquires interests in a
partnership in separate transactions must combine those
interests and maintain a single adjusted tax basis for all those
interests. Treasury Regulations under Section 1223 of the
Internal Revenue Code allow a selling common unitholder that can
identify common
120
units transferred with an ascertainable holding period to elect
to use the actual holding period of the common units
transferred. A common unitholder with common units purchased in
separate transactions is urged to consult its tax advisor as to
the possible consequences of this ruling and application of the
Treasury Regulations.
Limitations
on Deductibility of Losses
A common unitholders ability to deduct its allocable share
of Hiland Holdings losses is limited to the tax basis in
its Hiland Holdings common units and, in the case of an
individual, estate, trust, or corporate common unitholder (if
more than 50% of the value of the corporate common
unitholders stock is owned directly or indirectly by or
for five or fewer individuals or some tax-exempt organizations)
to the amount for which the common unitholder is considered to
be at risk with respect to Hiland Holdings
activities, if that amount is less than its tax basis. A common
unitholder subject to these limitations must recapture losses
deducted in previous years to the extent that distributions
cause its at-risk amount to be less than zero at the end of any
taxable year. Losses disallowed to a common unitholder or
recaptured as a result of these limitations will carry forward
and will be allowable as a deduction to the extent that its
at-risk amount is subsequently increased, provided such losses
do not exceed such common unitholders tax basis in its
common units. Upon the taxable disposition of a common unit, any
gain recognized by a common unitholder can be offset by losses
that were previously suspended by the at-risk limitation but may
not be offset by losses suspended by the basis limitation. Any
loss previously suspended by the at-risk limitation in excess of
that gain would no longer be utilizable.
In general, a common unitholder is at risk to the extent of the
tax basis of its Hiland Holdings common units, excluding any
portion of that basis attributable to its share of Hiland
Holdings nonrecourse liabilities, reduced by (i) any
portion of that basis representing amounts otherwise protected
against loss because of a guarantee, stop loss agreement or
other similar arrangement and (ii) any amount of money he
borrows to acquire or hold its common units, if the lender of
those borrowed funds owns an interest in Hiland Holdings or
Hiland Partners, is related to the common unitholder, or can
look only to the common units for repayment. A common
unitholders at-risk amount increases or decreases as the
tax basis of the common unitholders common units increases
or decreases, other than as a result of increases or decreases
in its share of Hiland Holdings nonrecourse liabilities.
In addition to the basis and at-risk limitations on the
deductibility of losses, the passive loss limitations generally
provide that individuals, estates, trusts, and some closely-held
corporations and personal service corporations can deduct losses
from passive activities (which are generally trade or business
activities in which the taxpayer does not materially
participate) only to the extent of the taxpayers income
from those passive activities. The passive loss limitations are
applied separately with respect to each publicly traded
partnership. Consequently, in some circumstances, a Hiland
Holdings common unitholder may have suspended passive activity
losses attributable to its allocations of income and loss from
Hiland Holdings. As a result of such common unitholders
disposition of its entire interest in Hiland Partners pursuant
to the Hiland Holdings merger and the Hiland Partners merger,
the common unitholder would generally be entitled to deduct such
losses in full. However, the passive loss limitations are
applied after other applicable limitations on deductions,
including the at-risk rules and the basis limitations which may
otherwise prevent the deduction of such passive activity losses.
Non-U.S.
Holders of Hiland Holdings Common Units
A
non-U.S. common
unitholder that receives the Hiland Holdings merger
consideration in exchange for its Hiland Holdings common unit
will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain
realized from the sale or disposition of that common unit to the
extent such gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade
or business of the foreign common unitholder. Under a ruling
published by the IRS, interpreting the scope of
effectively connected income, a foreign common
unitholder of Hiland Holdings would be considered to be engaged
in a trade or business in the United States by virtue of the
U.S. activities of Hiland Holdings, and part or all of that
common unitholders gain would be effectively connected
with that common unitholders indirect U.S. trade or
business. Moreover, under the Foreign Investment in Real
Property Tax Act, a foreign
121
common unitholder generally will be subject to U.S. federal
income tax upon the sale or disposition of a common unit if
(i) he owned (directly or constructively, applying certain
attribution rules) more than 5% of the Hiland Holdings common
units at any time during the five-year period ending on the date
of such disposition and (ii) 50% or more of the fair market
value of all of Hiland Holdings assets consisted of
U.S. real property interests at any time during the shorter
of the period during which such common unitholder held the
common units or the
5-year
period ending on the date of disposition. Currently, more than
50% of Hiland Holdings assets consist of U.S. real
property interests. Therefore, foreign common unitholders may be
subject to U.S. federal income tax on their gain resulting
from the Hiland Holdings merger.
Constructive
Termination
Hiland Holdings will be considered to have terminated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes if, within a twelve-month
period, there are sales or exchanges of common units which, in
the aggregate, constitute 50% or more of the total interests in
Hiland Holdings capital and profits. For purposes of
measuring whether the 50% threshold is reached, multiple sales
of the same interest are counted only once. While the sales and
exchanges resulting from the Hiland Partners merger and the
Hiland Holdings merger are not anticipated to cause a
constructive termination of the Hiland Holdings partnership, it
is possible that, when aggregated with prior and subsequent
transfers of non publicly-held interests in Hiland Holding
within a twelve-month period, the aggregate interests
transferred may constitute 50% or more of the total interests in
Hiland Holdings capital and profits, causing a
constructive termination of the Hiland Holdings partnership. A
constructive termination results in the closing of Hiland
Holdings taxable year for all common unitholders. In the
case of a common unitholder reporting on a taxable year other
than a fiscal year ending December 31, the closing of
Hiland Holdings taxable year may result in such common
unitholders share of Hiland Holdings taxable income
or loss for more than twelve month being includable in its
taxable income for the year of termination.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
Payment of the cash consideration with respect to the Hiland
Holdings merger may be subject to information reporting and
backup withholding at the applicable rate (currently 28%),
unless the holder of Hiland Holdings common units properly
certifies its taxpayer identification number or otherwise
establishes an exemption from backup withholding and complies
with all other applicable requirements of the backup withholding
rules. These requirements will be set forth in the letter of
transmittal and should be carefully reviewed by each holder of
Hiland Holdings common units. Backup withholding is not an
additional tax. Any amounts so withheld may be allowed as a
refund or a credit against such common unitholders
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that
the required information is properly and timely furnished to the
IRS.
Structure
and Steps of the Mergers
The transactions necessary to effectuate the mergers will take
place in a number of steps that are governed by the agreements
described below.
The
Hiland Partners Merger
Pursuant to the provisions of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement, HLND Merger Sub will merge with and into Hiland
Partners, with Hiland Partners continuing as the surviving
entity. For a more detailed description of the Hiland Partners
merger agreement, see The Hiland Partners Merger
Agreement beginning on page 133.
Immediately prior to the closing of the Hiland Partners merger,
each common unit of Hiland Partners (other than common units
owned by the Hiland Partners rollover common unitholders will be
cancelled and convert automatically into the right to receive
$7.75 in cash. Restricted common units held by non-employee
members of the Hiland Partners Board of Directors will vest
immediately prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners
merger and automatically convert into the right to receive the
Hiland Partners merger consideration.
122
The following partnership interests shall be unaffected and
remain outstanding as partnership interests in the surviving
entity in the Hiland Partners merger, and their holders will not
receive any consideration as part of the Hiland Partners merger:
|
|
|
|
|
2,321,471 Hiland Partners common units owned by Hiland Holdings;
|
|
|
|
3,060,000 subordinated units representing limited partners
interests in Hiland Partners owned by Hiland Holdings;
|
|
|
|
any restricted common units, phantom units and unit option
awards issued to employees pursuant to the Hiland Partners, LP
Long-Term Incentive Plan that remain outstanding as of the
effective time of the Hiland Partners merger;
|
|
|
|
the 2% general partner interest in Hiland Partners, represented
by 191,186 general partner units owned by the general partner of
Hiland Partners; and
|
|
|
|
the incentive distribution rights in Hiland Partners owned by
the general partner of Hiland Partners.
|
Upon closing of the Hiland Partners merger, each limited
liability company unit of HLND Merger Sub outstanding
immediately prior to the closing will automatically convert into
one common unit of the surviving entity.
The
Hiland Partners Support Agreement
Hiland Holdings and the general partner of Hiland Holdings
entered into the Hiland Partners support agreement with Hiland
Partners, the general partner of Hiland Partners, Parent and
HLND Merger Sub in which Hiland Holdings agreed to
(i) maintain the ownership of its 2,321,471 common and
3,060,000 subordinated units of Hiland Partners, which represent
approximately 37% and 100% of their respective classes
outstanding, (ii) vote its common units and subordinated
units of Hiland Partners in favor of the approval of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger, and
(iii) grant an irrevocable proxy to Parent for the purpose
of voting in favor of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and
the Hiland Partners merger as described above.
The Hiland Partners support agreement terminates on the earliest
to occur of (i) the time the Hiland Partners merger becomes
effective pursuant to the terms of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement, (ii) the termination of the Hiland Partners
merger agreement in accordance with its terms, or (iii) the
written agreement of the parties thereto to terminate the Hiland
Partners support agreement.
The Hiland Partners support agreement is attached as
Annex B to this joint proxy statement.
The
Hiland Holdings Merger
Pursuant to the provisions of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, HPGP Merger Sub will merge with and into Hiland
Holdings, with Hiland Holdings continuing as the surviving
entity. For a more detailed description of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement, see The Hiland Holdings Merger
Agreement beginning on page 152. Immediately prior to
the closing of the Hiland Holdings merger, each common unit of
Hiland Holdings (other than common units owned by the Hiland
Holdings rollover common unitholders will be cancelled and
convert automatically into the right to receive $2.40 in cash.
Restricted common units held by non-employee members of the
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors will vest immediately prior
to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger and
automatically convert into the right to receive the Hiland
Holdings merger consideration.
The following partnership interests shall be unaffected and
remain outstanding as partnership interests in the surviving
entity in the Hiland Holdings merger, and their holders will not
receive any consideration as part of the Hiland Holdings merger:
|
|
|
|
|
8,481,350 Hiland Holdings common units owned by Continental Gas,
an affiliate of Harold Hamm;
|
|
|
|
2,757,390 Hiland Holdings common units owned by the Harold Hamm
DST Trust;
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
1,839,712 Hiland Holdings common units owned by the Harold Hamm
HJ Trust;
|
|
|
|
59,600 Hiland Holdings common units owned by Harold Hamm;
|
|
|
|
any restricted common units, phantom units and unit option
awards issued to employees pursuant to the Hiland Holdings GP,
LP Long-Term Incentive Plan that remain outstanding as of the
effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger; and
|
|
|
|
the general partner interest in Hiland Holdings owned by the
general partner of Hiland Holdings.
|
Upon closing of the Hiland Holdings merger, each limited
liability company unit of HPGP Merger Sub outstanding
immediately prior to the closing will automatically convert into
one common unit of the surviving entity.
The
Hiland Holdings Support Agreement
Mr. Hamm, Continental Gas and the Hamm family trusts, who
beneficially own an aggregate of 13,138,052 common units of
Hiland Holdings, which represent approximately 60.8% of the
common units outstanding, have entered into the Hiland Holdings
support agreement with Hiland Holdings and the general partner
of Hiland Holdings in which they each agreed to
(i) maintain the ownership of their common units of Hiland
Holdings, (ii) vote their common units of Hiland Holdings
in favor of the approval of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings merger, and (iii) grant an
irrevocable proxy to the designee of Hiland Holdings for the
purpose of voting in favor of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger as described above.
The Hiland Holdings support agreement terminates on the earliest
to occur of (i) the time the Hiland Holdings merger becomes
effective pursuant to the terms of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, (ii) the termination of the Hiland Partners
merger agreement in accordance with its terms, or (iii) the
written agreement of the parties thereto to terminate the Hiland
Holdings support agreement.
The Hiland Holdings support agreement is attached as
Annex E to this joint proxy statement.
Financing
of the Mergers
The total amount of funds necessary to consummate both the
Hiland Partners merger and the Hiland Holdings merger and the
related transactions is anticipated to be approximately
$51.3 million. This amount will be funded entirely in cash
contributed by Mr. Hamm and the Hamm family trusts to
Parent and the applicable Merger Sub.
Mr. Hamm has delivered to Parent the Hiland Partners
commitment letter, pursuant to which Mr. Hamm has committed
to contribute an aggregate of approximately $32.0 million
in cash to Parent, representing the Hiland Partners merger
consideration of approximately $30.9 million and estimated
expenses of approximately $1.1 million, less the amount of
cash, if any, contributed by the Hamm family trusts to Parent or
HLND Merger Sub that is available immediately prior to the
closing of the Hiland Partners merger.
Mr. Hamm has delivered to Parent the Hiland Holdings
commitment letter, pursuant to which Mr. Hamm has committed
to contribute an aggregate of approximately $21.2 million
in cash to Parent, representing the Hiland Holdings merger
consideration of approximately $20.4 million and estimated
expenses of approximately $800,000, less the amount of cash, if
any, contributed by the Hamm family trusts to Parent or HPGP
Merger Sub that is available immediately prior to the closing of
the Hiland Holdings merger.
There is no financing condition to the obligations of
Mr. Hamm to fund the amounts under either commitment
letter. In addition, Hiland Partners is a third-party
beneficiary under the Hiland Partners commitment letter, and
Hiland Holdings is a third-party beneficiary under the Hiland
Holdings commitment letter. There is no alternative financing
plan.
124
Estimated
Fees and Expenses
Under the terms of the merger agreements, all expenses will
generally be borne by the party incurring such expenses and
expenses associated with the printing, filing and mailing of
this joint proxy statement and the
Schedule 13E-3
for each of the Hiland Companies and any amendments or
supplements thereto and the solicitation of unitholder approvals
will be borne by the Hiland Companies. Each merger agreement
also provides, however, that in certain circumstances upon
termination of such merger agreement, Hiland Partners or Hiland
Holdings would have to reimburse the Hamm Continuing Investors
for their expenses associated with the mergers, up to an
aggregate of $1.9 million. For more information about the
termination expenses, please see The Hiland Partners
Merger Agreement Reimbursement of Certain
Expenses beginning on page 150 and The Hiland
Holdings Merger Agreement Reimbursement of
Certain Expenses beginning on page 168.
Hiland
Partners Fees and Expenses
Jefferies & Company has provided certain financial
advisory services to the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committees in
connection with the Hiland Partners merger. Hiland Partners will
pay Jefferies & Company compensation for its services,
and Hiland Partners has agreed to reimburse
Jefferies & Company for all reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by them, including the reasonable fees and
expenses of legal counsel, and to indemnify
Jefferies & Company against certain liabilities and
expenses in connection with its engagement, including certain
liabilities under the federal securities laws. See
Opinion of Financial Advisors of Hiland
Partners for more information about Jefferies &
Companys compensation.
The Hiland Companies have
retained ,
as a proxy solicitation and information agent,
and ,
as the paying agent, in connection with the
mergers.
may contact holders of Hiland Partners common units by mail,
telephone, facsimile,
e-mail and
personal interview and may request banks, brokers, dealers and
other nominee unitholders to forward materials relating to the
Hiland Partners merger to beneficial owners.
As compensation for acting as a proxy solicitation and
information agent in connection with the
mergers,
will receive reasonable and customary compensation. Hiland
Partners will pay the paying agent reasonable and customary
compensation for its services in connection with the Hiland
Partners merger, plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses,
and will indemnify the paying agent against certain liabilities
and expenses in connection therewith, including certain
liabilities under federal securities laws. Brokers, dealers,
commercial banks and trust companies will be reimbursed by
Hiland Partners for customary handling and mailing expenses
incurred by them in forwarding material to their customers.
The following is an estimate of fees and expenses to be incurred
by Hiland Partners in connection with the Hiland Partners merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Legal
|
|
$
|
|
|
Financial Advisors
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounting
|
|
$
|
|
|
Printing and Mailing
|
|
$
|
|
|
SEC Filing Fees
|
|
$
|
|
|
Paying Agent
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proxy Solicitation and Information Agent
|
|
$
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
Hiland
Holdings Fees and Expenses
Barclays has provided certain financial advisory services to the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committees in connection with the
Hiland Holdings merger. Hiland Holdings will pay Barclays
compensation for its services,
125
and Hiland Holdings has agreed to reimburse Barclays for all
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them, including
the reasonable fees and expenses of legal counsel, and to
indemnify Barclays against certain liabilities and expenses in
connection with their engagement, including certain liabilities
under the federal securities laws. See
Opinions of Financial Advisors for more
information about Barclays compensation.
The Hiland Companies have
retained ,
as a proxy solicitation and information agent,
and ,
as the paying agent, in connection with the
mergers.
may contact holders of Hiland Holdings common units by mail,
telephone, facsimile,
e-mail and
personal interview and may request banks, brokers, dealers and
other nominee unitholders to forward materials relating to the
Hiland Holdings merger to beneficial owners.
As compensation for acting as a proxy solicitation and
information agent in connection with the
mergers,
will receive reasonable and customary compensation. Hiland
Holdings will pay the paying agent reasonable and customary
compensation for its services in connection with the Hiland
Holdings merger, plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses,
and will indemnify the paying agent against certain liabilities
and expenses in connection therewith, including certain
liabilities under federal securities laws. Brokers, dealers,
commercial banks and trust companies will be reimbursed by
Hiland Holdings for customary handling and mailing expenses
incurred by them in forwarding material to their customers.
The following is an estimate of fees and expenses to be incurred
by Hiland Holdings in connection with the Hiland Holdings merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Advisors
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printing and Mailing
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEC Filing Fees
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paying Agent
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy Solicitation and Information Agent
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain
Legal Matters
General
The mergers are subject to the receipt of certain regulatory and
other approvals. The Hiland Companies are currently seeking such
approvals. There can be no assurance that any such approval, if
required, will be obtained without substantial conditions or at
all or that adverse consequences would not result to the Hiland
Companies business or that certain parts of the Hiland
Companies business would not have to be disposed of in the
event that such approval were not obtained or such other actions
were not taken or in order to obtain any such approval or other
action.
In the merger agreements, the parties have agreed to cooperate
with each other to make all filings with governmental
authorities and to obtain all governmental approvals and
consents necessary to consummate the mergers, subject to certain
exceptions and limitations. It is a condition to the
consummation of each of the mergers that required governmental
consents and approvals shall have been obtained before the
effective date of the mergers.
126
HSR
Act
Under the HSR Act, Hiland Partners cannot complete the Hiland
Partners merger until Hiland Partners has submitted certain
information to the Antitrust Division of the Department of
Justice and the Federal Trade Commission and satisfied the
statutory waiting period requirements. Both Hiland Partners and
Parent anticipate making the necessary initial filings under the
HSR Act as soon as practicable. The applicable waiting period
under the HSR Act will expire 30 calendar days after both
initial filings are made, unless earlier terminated or extended
by a request for additional information and documentary material
(which we refer to as a second request).
If the parties receive a second request, the waiting period is
tolled until Hiland Partners and Parent substantially comply
with such second request and observe a second 30
calendar-day
waiting period, unless earlier terminated. The parties expect to
receive clearance under the HSR Act prior to the termination
date in the Hiland Partners merger agreement, but there can be
no guarantee. Also, after clearance under the HSR Act, nothing
prevents the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade
Commission from later challenging the mergers on antitrust
grounds.
Certain
Litigation
Since Mr. Hamm, his affiliates and the Hamm family trusts
first proposed to acquire all of the outstanding common units of
each of the Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings that are not
owned by Mr. Hamm, his affiliates or Hamm family trusts on
January 15, 2009, a number of unitholder class action
lawsuits were filed against Hiland Partners, Hiland Holdings,
the general partner of each of Hiland Partners and Hiland
Holdings, and certain current and former members of the Hiland
Partners Board of Directors and Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors. These lawsuits are as follows: (i) Robert
Pasternack v. Hiland Partners, LP et al., In the Court
of Chancery of the State of Delaware, Civil Action
No. 4397-VCS;
(ii) Andrew Jones v. Hiland Partners, LP et
al., In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware,
Civil Action
No. 4558-VCS;
and (iii) Arthur G. Rosenberg v. Hiland Partners,
LP et al., In the District Court of Garfield County, State
of Oklahoma, Case
No. CJ-09-211-02.
The lawsuits allege a variety of causes of action challenging
the proposed mergers, including that the named directors have
breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the proposed
mergers. Generally, the lawsuits allege that
Mr. Hamms purchase offers are grossly inadequate and
substantially below the fair value of the common units and were
made in an effort to depress the value of the common units. The
lawsuits further allege that the members of the Conflicts
Committees are not capable of making a good faith decision
regarding the proposed mergers because, among other allegations,
(i) Mr. McNabb, Mr. Odell, Mr. Lyle, and
Ms. Evans lack independence because they each receive a
substantial salary from their service at Hiland Partners or
Hiland Holdings, which are controlled by Mr. Hamm,
(ii) the Conflicts Committees owe fiduciary duties to both
the outside unitholders and Mr. Hamm, and (iii) there
are certain other relationships between the members of the
Conflicts Committees and Mr. Hamm that preclude
independence. The plaintiffs in each lawsuit seek to enjoin
Hiland Partners, Hiland Holdings, the general partner of each of
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings, and their respective board
members from proceeding with any transaction arising from
Mr. Hamms going private proposals, along with
compensatory damages.
On June 25, 2009, the Conflicts Committees moved to dismiss the
Pasternack and Jones lawsuits, which are pending in Delaware,
and on June 26, 2009, the Hiland Companies and certain other
defendants joined in that motion. In the Rosenberg lawsuit,
which is pending in Oklahoma, the plaintiff filed a motion
seeking expedited discovery on June 17, 2009, and on June 24,
2009, the defendants filed a motion seeking to stay that
lawsuit. A hearing on those motions is set for July 10, 2009.
While the Hiland Companies do not believe these lawsuits have
merit and intend to defend themselves vigorously, the Hiland
Companies cannot predict the outcome of these lawsuits, or
others, nor can they predict the amount of time and expense that
will be required to resolve the lawsuits.
Provisions
for Unaffiliated Security Holders
No provision has been made to grant Hiland Partners or Hiland
Holdings unitholders, other than the Hamm Continuing Investors
or their affiliates, access to the partnership files of Hiland
Partners or Hiland
127
Holdings or any other party to the mergers or to obtain counsel
at the expense of Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings or any
other such party.
No
Appraisal Rights
Holders of Hiland Partners common units and Hiland Holdings
common units are not entitled to dissenters rights of
appraisal under the partnership agreements or applicable
Delaware law.
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETINGS AND VOTING
Date,
Time and Place
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings will hold separate special
meetings of common unitholders. Hiland Partners will hold a
special meeting of common unitholders
on ,
2009
at ,
local time, at . Hiland Holdings
will hold a special meeting of common unitholders
on ,
2009 at , local time,
at .
Purpose
Hiland
Partners
At the special meeting, Hiland Partners common unitholders will
be asked:
1. To consider and vote on a proposal to approve
(a) the Hiland Partners merger agreement, which, among
other things, provides that HLND Merger Sub will merge with and
into Hiland Partners, with Hiland Partners continuing as the
surviving entity and (b) the Hiland Partners merger.
2. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements
of the special meeting.
Hiland
Holdings
At the special meeting, Hiland Holdings common unitholders will
be asked:
1. To consider and vote on a proposal to approve
(a) the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, which, among
other things, provides that HPGP Merger Sub will merge with and
into Hiland Holdings, with Hiland Holdings continuing as the
surviving entity and (b) the Hiland Holdings merger.
2. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements
of the special meeting.
Record
Date and Quorum Requirement
Each of the Hiland Companies has
fixed ,
2009, as the record date. Only holders of record of Hiland
Partners common units or Hiland Holdings common units as of the
close of business on the record date will be entitled to notice
of, and to vote at, the special meeting of Hiland Partners and
Hiland Holdings, respectively. As of the record date, there were
approximately
common units of Hiland Partners issued and outstanding held by
approximately
holders of record. As of the record date, there were
approximately
common units of Hiland Holdings issued and outstanding held by
approximately
holders of record. Votes may be cast at the special meeting in
person or by proxy.
Each holder of record of Hiland Partners common units at the
close of business on the record date is entitled to one vote for
each common unit then held on each matter submitted to a vote of
unitholders at the Hiland Partners special meeting.
Each holder of record of Hiland Holdings common units at the
close of business on the record date is entitled to one vote for
each common unit then held on each matter submitted to a vote of
unitholders at the Hiland Holdings special meeting.
128
At each of the special meetings, the presence, in person or by
proxy, of common unitholders entitled to cast a majority of the
votes entitled to be cast by the Hiland Partners common
unitholders or the Hiland Holdings common unitholders, as
applicable, will constitute a quorum for the special meeting. If
you are a record holder on the record date and vote by proxy or
in person at the special meeting, you will be counted for
purposes of determining whether there is a quorum at the special
meeting. Hiland Partners common units and Hiland Holdings common
units that are entitled to vote but are not voted (called
abstentions) and broker non-votes will be counted for the
purpose of determining whether there is a quorum for the
transaction of business at the special meeting. A broker
non-vote occurs when a bank, broker or other nominee holding
units for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular
proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting
power for that particular item and has not received instructions
from the beneficial owner.
Voting by
Proxy
Holders of record can ensure that their units are voted at the
special meeting by completing, signing, dating and mailing the
enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope.
Submitting instructions by this method will not affect your
right to attend the special meeting for the Hiland Company in
which you own units and vote. If you hold your units through a
broker, bank or other nominee, you should follow the separate
voting instructions, if any, provided by the broker, bank or
other nominee with this joint proxy statement.
Voting
Via Telephone or the Internet
Voting via the Internet or by telephone is fast, convenient and
your vote is immediately confirmed and tabulated. If you choose
to vote by telephone or the Internet, instructions to do so are
set forth on the enclosed proxy card. The telephone and Internet
voting procedures are designed to authenticate votes cast by use
of a personal identification number, which appears on the proxy
card. These procedures, which comply with Delaware law, allow
unitholders to appoint a proxy to vote their units and to
confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded. If
you vote by telephone or the Internet, you do not have to mail
in your proxy card, but your vote must be received
by A.M., New York time,
on ,
2009.
If you own your Hiland Partners common units or Hiland Holdings
common units in your own name, you can vote via the Internet in
accordance with the instructions provided on the enclosed proxy
card. If your units are held by a bank, broker or other nominee,
please follow the instructions provided with your proxy
materials to determine if Internet or telephone voting is
available. If your bank or broker does make Internet or
telephone voting available, please follow the instructions
provided on the voting form supplied by your bank or broker.
Revoking
Your Proxy
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the
special meeting by:
|
|
|
|
|
giving written notice of your revocation in person at the
special meeting or in writing bearing a later date than your
proxy, delivered to the Secretary of Hiland Partners prior to
the special meeting, 205 West Maple, Suite 1100, Enid,
Oklahoma 73701 (if you are a Hiland Partners unitholder) or the
Secretary of Hiland Holdings, 205 West Maple,
Suite 1100, Enid, Oklahoma 73701 (if you are a Hiland
Holdings unitholder);
|
|
|
|
delivering to the Secretary of Hiland Partners or Hiland
Holdings, as applicable, prior to the special meeting, a duly
executed subsequent proxy (including a proxy delivered by
telephone or the Internet) bearing a later date and indicating a
contrary vote; or
|
|
|
|
attending the Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings special
meeting, as applicable, and voting in person, although
attendance at the special meeting will not by itself constitute
a revocation of a proxy.
|
If your units are held through a broker, bank or other nominee,
you should follow the instructions of your broker, bank or
nominee regarding the revocation of proxies. If your broker,
bank or nominee allows you to
129
submit a proxy by telephone or the Internet, you may be able to
change your vote by submitting a proxy again by telephone or the
Internet.
Who to
Call for Assistance
If you need assistance, including help in changing or revoking
your proxy, please
contact ,
which is acting as a proxy solicitation agent and information
agent in connection with the merger as follows:
Voting at
the Special Meetings
Submitting a proxy now will not limit your right to vote at the
applicable special meeting if you decide to attend in person. If
you plan to attend the special meeting and wish to vote in
person, you will be given a ballot at the special meeting.
Please note, however, that if your units are held in
street name, which means your units are held of
record by a broker, bank or other nominee, and you wish to vote
at the special meeting, you must bring to the special meeting a
proxy from the record holder of the units authorizing you to
vote at the special meeting. Please contact your broker, bank or
nominee for specific instructions.
Vote
Required at Hiland Partners Special Meeting; How Units are
Voted
Under the terms of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the
Hiland Partners partnership agreement, approval of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of (i) a
majority of the outstanding common units of Hiland Partners held
by the Hiland Partners public unitholders entitled to vote
thereon voting as a class and (ii) a majority of the
outstanding subordinated units of Hiland Partners entitled to
vote thereon voting as a class.
Hiland Holdings, who, as of June 15, 2009, held units
representing 100% of the total voting power of the Hiland
Partners subordinated units, has entered into the Hiland
Partners support agreement in which it has agreed to
(i) maintain the ownership of its common units and
subordinated units, (ii) vote its common units and
subordinated units in favor of the approval of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement, except in certain circumstances, and
(iii) grant an irrevocable proxy to Parent for the purpose
of voting in favor of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and
the Hiland Partners merger, except in certain circumstances, as
described above. See Special Factors Structure
and Steps of the Mergers beginning on page 122.
Pursuant to the Hiland Partners partnership agreement, the
general partner of Hiland Partners may authorize its designated
chairman of the special meeting to adjourn the special meeting.
Subject to revocation, all units represented by each properly
executed proxy will be voted in accordance with the instructions
indicated on the proxy. If you return a signed proxy card but do
not provide voting instructions (other than in the case of
broker non-votes), the persons named as proxies on the proxy
card will vote FOR the approval of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger, and in
such manner as the persons named on the proxy card in their
discretion determine with respect to such other business as may
properly come before the special meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a
vote AGAINST the Hiland Partners merger agreement
and the Hiland Partners merger. If the special meeting is
adjourned for any reason, at any subsequent reconvening of the
special meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same manner as
such proxies would have been voted at the original convening of
the meeting (except for any proxies that have been revoked or
withdrawn).
The proxy card confers discretionary authority on the persons
named on the proxy card to vote the units represented by the
proxy card on any other matter that is properly presented for
action at the special meeting. As of the date of this joint
proxy statement, Hiland Partners does not know of any other
matter to be raised at the Hiland Partners special meeting.
As
of ,
2009, the record date, the directors and executive officers of
the general partner of Hiland Partners held and were entitled to
vote, in the aggregate, Hiland Partners common units
representing approximately % of the
outstanding Hiland Partners common units. Hiland Partners
believes that the directors and executive officers of the
general partner of Hiland Partners intend to vote all of their
Hiland
130
Partners common units FOR the approval of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger. Pursuant to the
terms of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland
Partners partnership agreement, however, the votes of directors
and officers of the general partner of Hiland Partners will not
be counted in determining if the Hiland Partner merger agreement
and the Hiland Partners merger have been approved by a majority
of the outstanding Hiland Partners common units owned by the
Hiland Partners public unitholders.
Vote
Required at Hiland Holdings Special Meeting; How Units are
Voted
Under the terms of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
Hiland Holdings partnership agreement, the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger requires the
affirmative vote of (i) holders of a majority of the
outstanding common units of Hiland Holdings entitled to vote
thereon voting as a class and (ii) holders of a majority of
the outstanding common units of Hiland Holdings held by the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders entitled to vote thereon
voting as a class.
Harold Hamm, Continental Gas and the Hamm family trusts, who, as
of June 15, 2009, collectively held 13,138,052 common units
of Hiland Holdings representing approximately 60.8% of the total
voting power of the Hiland Holdings common units, have entered
into the Hiland Holdings support agreement in which they have
agreed to (i) maintain the ownership of their common units,
except in certain circumstances, (ii) vote their common
units in favor of the approval of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger, except in certain
circumstances, and (iii) grant an irrevocable proxy to the
designee of Hiland Holdings for the purpose of voting in favor
of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
merger as described above. See Special Factors
Structure and Steps of the Mergers, beginning on
page 122.
Pursuant to the Hiland Holdings partnership agreement, the
general partner of Hiland Holdings may authorize its designated
chairman of the special meeting to adjourn the special meeting.
Subject to revocation, all units represented by each properly
executed proxy will be voted in accordance with the instructions
indicated on the proxy. If you return a signed proxy card but do
not provide voting instructions (other than in the case of
broker non-votes), the persons named as proxies on the proxy
card will vote FOR the approval of the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger, and in
such manner as the persons named on the proxy card in their
discretion determine with respect to such other business as may
properly come before the special meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a
vote AGAINST the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings merger. If the special meeting is
adjourned for any reason, at any subsequent reconvening of the
special meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same manner as
such proxies would have been voted at the original convening of
the meeting (except for any proxies that have been revoked or
withdrawn).
The proxy card confers discretionary authority on the persons
named on the proxy card to vote the units represented by the
proxy card on any other matter that is properly presented for
action at the special meeting. As of the date of this joint
proxy statement, Hiland Holdings does not know of any other
matter to be raised at the Hiland Holdings special meeting.
As
of ,
2009, the record date, the directors and executive officers of
the general partner of Hiland Holdings held and were entitled to
vote, in the aggregate, Hiland Holdings common units
representing approximately % of the
outstanding Hiland Holdings common units. Hiland Holdings
believes that the directors and executive officers of the
general partner of Hiland Holdings intend to vote all of their
Hiland Holdings common units FOR the approval of the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger.
Pursuant to the terms of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings partnership agreement, however, the
votes of directors and officers of the general partner of Hiland
Holdings will not be counted in determining if the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger have
been approved by a majority of the outstanding Hiland Holdings
common units owned by the Hiland Holdings public unitholders.
131
Proxy
Solicitation
This joint proxy statement is being furnished in connection with
the solicitation of proxies by the Hiland Companies. Each of the
Hiland Companies will bear its respective costs of soliciting
proxies. These costs include the preparation, assembly and
mailing of this joint proxy statement, the notice of the special
meeting of unitholders and the enclosed proxy card, as well as
the cost of forwarding these materials to the beneficial owners
of Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings common units. The
directors, officers and regular employees of the Hiland
Companies may, without compensation other than their regular
compensation, solicit proxies by telephone,
e-mail, the
Internet, facsimile or personal conversation, as well as by
mail. The Hiland Companies have
retained ,
a proxy solicitation firm, to assist with the solicitation of
proxies for the special meeting for a fee estimated not to
exceed $ plus expenses. The Hiland
Companies may also reimburse brokerage firms, custodians,
nominees, fiduciaries and others for expenses incurred in
forwarding proxy material to the beneficial owners of Hiland
Partners and Hiland Holdings common units. See Special
Factors Estimated Fees and Expenses for more
information about the fees the Hiland Companies expect to pay in
connection with the mergers.
Please do not send any certificates representing Hiland Partners
common units or Hiland Holdings common units with your proxy
card. If the mergers are completed, the procedure for the
exchange of certificates representing common units of Hiland
Partners or Hiland Holdings will be as described in this joint
proxy statement. For a description of procedures for exchanging
certificates representing common units of Hiland Partners or
Hiland Holdings for the merger consideration following
completion of the mergers, see The Hiland Partners Merger
Agreement Payment for Hiland Partners Common Units
in the Merger and The Hiland Holdings Merger
Agreement Payment for Hiland Holdings Common Units
in the Merger.
ADJOURNMENT
Pursuant to the partnership agreements of Hiland Partners and
Hiland Holdings, the respective general partner of each of
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings may authorize its designated
chairman of the special meeting to adjourn the respective
special meeting. The general partner of Hiland Partners or
Hiland Holdings may adjourn its respective special meeting
(including a further adjournment of an adjourned meeting) to a
date within 45 days of the special meeting without further
notice other than by an announcement made at the special meeting
(or such adjourned meeting) and without setting a new record
date. If the requisite unitholder vote to approve the merger
agreements and the mergers has not been received at the time of
the special meeting (or such adjourned meeting) of either Hiland
Company, such Hiland Company may choose to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the applicable merger agreement and merger.
OTHER
MATTERS
Other
Matters for Action at the Special Meetings
As of the date of this joint proxy statement, the Board of
Directors of each of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings know of
no matters that will be presented for consideration at their
respective special meetings other than as described in this
joint proxy statement.
Householding
of Special Meeting Materials
Some banks, brokers and other nominees may be participating in
the practice of householding proxy statements and
annual reports. This means that only one copy of this notice and
joint proxy statement may have been sent to multiple unitholders
in your household. If you would prefer to receive separate
copies of a joint proxy statement either now or in the future,
please contact your bank, broker or other nominee. Upon written
or oral request
to ,
we will provide a separate copy of the proxy statements. In
addition, unitholders sharing an address can request delivery of
a single copy of proxy statements if you are receiving multiple
copies upon written or oral request
to
at the address and telephone number stated above.
132
THE
HILAND PARTNERS MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement, a copy of which is attached as
Annex A to this joint proxy statement. The provisions of
the Hiland Partners merger agreement are extensive and not
easily summarized. You should carefully read the Hiland Partners
merger agreement in its entirety because it, and not this joint
proxy statement, is the legal document that governs the merger.
In addition, you should read Special Factors
Structure and Steps of the Mergers The Hiland
Partners Merger beginning on page 122.
This summary of the Hiland Partners merger agreement is included
to provide you with information regarding the terms of the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and is not intended to provide
any other factual information about Hiland Partners or the other
parties to the Hiland Partners merger agreement. The Hiland
Partners merger agreement contains representations and
warranties by each of the parties to the Hiland Partners merger
agreement. These representations and warranties have been made
solely for the benefit of the other parties to the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and:
|
|
|
|
|
may be intended not as statements of fact, but rather as a way
of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements
prove to be inaccurate;
|
|
|
|
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other
party in connection with the negotiation of the Hiland Partners
merger agreement, which disclosures are not reflected in the
Hiland Partners merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different
from what may be viewed as material to you or other
investors; and
|
|
|
|
were made only as of the date of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and are subject to more recent
developments.
|
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not
describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were
made or at any other time.
Additional information about Hiland Partners may be found
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and Hiland
Partners other public filings. Please see Where You
Can Find More Information, beginning on page 191.
Structure
of the Merger
At the closing of the Hiland Partners merger, HLND Merger Sub
will merge with and into Hiland Partners and the separate
existence of HLND Merger Sub will cease. Hiland Partners will be
the surviving entity in the Hiland Partners merger and will
continue to be a Delaware limited partnership after the Hiland
Partners merger. The Hiland Partners partnership agreement, as
in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger, will be the partnership agreement of the
surviving entity until thereafter changed or amended in
accordance with the provisions of the Hiland Partners
partnership agreement and applicable law.
When the
Merger Becomes Effective
The closing of the Hiland Partners merger will take place on a
date to be specified by the parties, which will be no later than
the third business day after the satisfaction or waiver of the
closing conditions stated in the Hiland Partners merger
agreement (other than those conditions that by their nature are
to be satisfied at the closing, but subject to the satisfaction
or waiver of such conditions), unless another date is agreed to
in writing by the parties. The Hiland Partners merger will
become effective at the time, which we refer to as the
effective time of the Hiland Partners merger, when
Hiland Partners files a certificate of merger with the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware, or at such later date or time
as Parent and Hiland Partners agree in writing and specify in
the certificate of merger.
133
Effect of
the Merger on the Common Units and Certain Other Securities of
Hiland Partners and HLND Merger Sub
Each common unit of Hiland Partners (other than common units
owned by Hiland Holdings and restricted common units owned by
certain employees of Hiland Partners as described below) which
we sometimes refer to as the Hiland Partners rollover
common unitholders outstanding immediately prior to the
closing of the Hiland Partners merger, will be cancelled and
convert automatically into the right to receive $7.75 in cash.
Restricted common units held by non-employee members of the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors will vest immediately prior
to the effective time and automatically convert into the right
to receive the Hiland Partners merger consideration.
Other restricted common units, phantom units and unit option
awards issued pursuant to the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan that remain outstanding as of the effective time
of the Hiland Partners merger will remain outstanding in
accordance with their respective terms as equity awards in the
surviving entity in the Hiland Partners merger. Additionally,
the following partnership interests shall be unaffected and
remain outstanding as partnership interests in the surviving
entity in the Hiland Partners merger, and their holders will not
receive any consideration as part of the Hiland Partners merger:
|
|
|
|
|
2,321,471 Hiland Partners common units owned by Hiland Holdings;
|
|
|
|
3,060,000 subordinated units representing limited partners
interests in Hiland Partners (the subordinated
units) owned by Hiland Holdings;
|
|
|
|
the 2% general partner interest in Hiland Partners, represented
by 191,186 general partner units owned by the general partner of
Hiland Partners; and
|
|
|
|
the incentive distribution rights in Hiland Partners owned by
the general partner of Hiland Partners.
|
Upon closing of the Hiland Partners merger, each limited
liability company unit of HLND Merger Sub outstanding
immediately prior to the closing will automatically convert into
one common unit of the surviving entity.
Payment
for Hiland Partners Common Units in the Merger
At or prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger,
Parent and HLND Merger Sub will deposit, or cause to be
deposited
with ,
as paying agent, in trust for the benefit of the holders of
Hiland Partners common units (other than those holders who will
not receive the Hiland Partners merger consideration, as
described above), sufficient cash to pay to the Hiland Partners
common unitholders (other than the Hiland Partners rollover
common unitholders) the merger consideration of $7.75 per unit.
As soon as reasonably practicable but in any event not later
than five business days following the effective time of the
Hiland Partners merger, Parent will cause the paying agent to
mail to each record holder of common units of Hiland Partners
that were converted into the right to receive the Hiland
Partners merger consideration a letter of transmittal and
instructions for use in effecting the surrender of certificates
that formerly represented common units of Hiland Partners or
non-certificated common units represented by book-entry in
exchange for the Hiland Partners merger consideration.
Upon surrender of the certificates or book-entry common units
and a duly completed and validly executed letter of transmittal,
together with any other documents required by the letter of
transmittal or customarily required by the paying agent, a
holder of Hiland Partners common units will be entitled to
receive a check for the aggregate Hiland Partners merger
consideration owed to such unitholder. No interest will be paid
or accrue on the Hiland Partners merger consideration. Parent,
the surviving entity in the Hiland Partners merger and the
paying agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from the
payment of the Hiland Partners merger consideration amounts that
are required to be withheld or deducted under applicable tax
laws.
No transfers of Hiland Partners common units will be made on the
unit transfer register of Hiland Partners from and after the
effective time of the Hiland Partners merger. In the event of a
transfer of ownership of common units that is not registered in
the unit transfer register of Hiland Partners, a check for any
cash to be paid upon surrender of the certificate formerly
representing those shares may be paid to the transferee if
134
the certificate is presented to the paying agent with all
documents required to evidence and effect the transfer of the
shares and to evidence that any applicable stock transfer or
other taxes have been paid or are not applicable.
Representations
and Warranties
The Hiland Partners merger agreement contains representations
and warranties of Hiland Partners and its general partner (which
we collectively refer to as the Hiland Parties) and
of Parent and HLND Merger Sub (which we refer to as the
HLND Parent Parties) as to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
legal organization, existence and good standing, including, as
to the Hiland Parties, with respect to its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
corporate, partnership or similar power and authority to enter
into the Hiland Partners merger agreement and to consummate the
transaction contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger agreement
and due authorization of the execution, delivery and performance
of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the consummation of
the Hiland Partners merger;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain violations, defaults or consent
requirements under certain contracts, organizational documents
and law, in each case arising out of the execution and delivery
of, and consummation of, the transactions contemplated by the
Hiland Partners merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of materially misleading statements or omissions in
required filings with the SEC, or information provided in
connection with required filings with the SEC (including this
joint proxy statement) in connection with the Hiland Partners
merger;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any fees owed to investment bankers, finders or
brokers in connection with the Hiland Partners merger, other
than those specified in the Hiland Partners merger agreement.
|
The Hiland Partners merger agreement contains representations
and warranties of the Hiland Parties as to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the capitalization of the Hiland Parties and the absence of
certain rights to purchase or acquire equity securities of the
Hiland Parties, the absence of any bonds or other obligations
allowing holders the right to vote with unitholders of the
Hiland Parties and the absence of unitholder agreements or
voting trusts to which the Hiland Parties is a party, other than
those specified in the Hiland Partners merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the financial statements of Hiland Partners and its subsidiaries
included or incorporated by reference into Hiland Partners
SEC filings;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain undisclosed indebtedness or liabilities,
other than those incurred or accrued in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practices since December 31,
2008;
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws by the Hiland Parties;
|
|
|
|
environmental matters and compliance with environmental laws by
the Hiland Parties;
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Parties employee benefit plans and other
agreements with their employees;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain changes since December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain litigation, orders and judgments and
governmental proceedings and investigations related to the
Hiland Parties, except as otherwise disclosed to the HLND Parent
Parties by the Hiland Parties;
|
|
|
|
the payment of taxes, the filing or tax returns and other tax
matters;
|
|
|
|
labor matters related to the Hiland Parties;
|
|
|
|
property owned and certain rights-of-way sufficient for the
conduct of the Hiland Parties businesses;
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
the opinion received by the Hiland Parties from
Jefferies & Company;
|
|
|
|
the required approvals of the Hiland Partners merger agreement
and the Hiland Partners merger, including the approval by the
Hiland Partners unitholders at the special meeting;
|
|
|
|
material contracts of the Hiland Parties and the performance of
obligations thereunder; and
|
|
|
|
the absence of any approval requirements under any state
takeover statutes.
|
The Hiland Partners merger agreement also contains
representations and warranties of the HLND Parent Parties as to,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the HLND Parent Parties ability to finance the Hiland
Partners merger and certain related costs;
|
|
|
|
the ownership of HLND Merger Sub and the absence of any previous
business activities by HLND Merger Sub other than in connection
with the transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the access to information about the Hiland Parties that has been
provided to the HLND Parent Parties; and
|
|
|
|
the limitation of the Hiland Parties representations and
warranties to those set forth in the Hiland Partners merger
agreement or in certificates entered into in connection with the
Hiland Partners merger agreement.
|
Some of the representations and warranties in the merger
agreement are qualified by materiality qualifications or a
material adverse effect clause.
For purposes of the Hiland Partners merger agreement, a
material adverse effect means, with respect to
Hiland Partners, any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect
or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate with all
other facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or
occurrences, has had or would be reasonably likely to have a
material adverse effect on the assets, liabilities, properties,
business, results of operations or condition (financial or
otherwise) of Hiland Partners and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, or on the ability of the Hiland Parties to perform their
obligations under the Hiland Partners merger agreement or to
consummate the Hiland Partners merger.
In any case, however, a material adverse effect with
respect to Hiland Partners will not include:
|
|
|
|
|
facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
generally affecting the midstream oil and gas or gathering and
processing industries (including commodity prices);
|
|
|
|
generally affecting the economy or the financial or securities
markets in the United States or globally (including interest
rates); or
|
|
|
|
generally affecting regulatory or political conditions in the
United States or globally,
|
except, with respect to the above three bullet-points, for any
fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence that
affects the assets, liabilities, properties, business, results
of operations or condition (financial or otherwise) of Hiland
Partners and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in a
disproportionately adverse manner, compared to other
participants in the midstream oil and gas or gathering and
processing industries;
|
|
|
|
|
facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
caused by compliance with the terms of the Hiland Partners
merger agreement (including omissions required by the Hiland
Partners merger agreement);
|
|
|
|
caused by the announcement or pendency of the Hiland Partners
merger (including litigation brought by any holder of common or
subordinated units in Hiland Partners (on their own behalf or on
behalf
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
of Hiland Partners) or loss of or adverse changes in
relationships with employees, customers or suppliers of Hiland
Partners); or
|
|
|
|
|
|
caused by any action taken or omitted to be taken by an officer
of the general partner of Hiland Partners at the direction of
Parent or HLND Merger Sub or Harold Hamm (other than (i) in
his capacity as part of, (ii) in accordance with authority
delegated to him by, or (iii) as otherwise authorized by,
the Hiland Partners Board of Directors or any committee thereof);
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable statutes, regulations, statutory rules,
order, judgments, decrees and terms and conditions of any grant
of approval, permission, authority, permit or license of any
court, governmental entity, statutory body or self-regulatory
authority (including the NASDAQ Global Select Market) after the
date hereof;
|
|
|
|
changes in generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States, or GAAP, after the date hereof;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in the market price of Hiland Partners common units
(except that this exception will not prevent or otherwise affect
a determination that any fact, circumstance, event, change,
effect or occurrence underlying such decrease has resulted in,
or contributed to, a material adverse effect);
|
|
|
|
any failure by the Hiland Parties to meet any internal or
publicly disclosed projections, forecasts or estimates of
revenue or earnings (except that this exception will not prevent
or otherwise affect a determination that any fact, circumstance,
event, change, effect or occurrence underlying such failure has
resulted in, or contributed to, a material adverse effect);
|
|
|
|
a failure, if any, of Hiland Operating, LLC (a subsidiary of
Hiland Partners) to be in compliance with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Interest Coverage Ratio required by Section 6.17 of the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement; or
|
|
|
|
the Leverage Ratio required by Section 6.18 of the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement,
|
except that failure to be in compliance with the above ratios
will not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any
fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence
underlying such default has resulted in, or contributed to, a
material adverse effect; or
|
|
|
|
|
any decrease in distributions in respect of the Hiland Partners
common units (except that this exception will not prevent or
otherwise affect a determination that any fact, circumstance,
event, change, effect or occurrence underlying such decrease has
resulted in, or contributed to, a material adverse effect).
|
For purposes of the Hiland Partners merger agreement, a
material adverse effect means, with respect to the
HLND Parent Parties, any fact, circumstance, event, change,
effect or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate with
all other facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or
occurrences, prevents or materially delays or materially impairs
or would be reasonably likely to prevent or materially delay or
materially impair the ability of Parent or HLND Merger Sub to
consummate the Hiland Partners merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger agreement.
Agreements
Related to the Conduct of Business
The Hiland Partners merger agreement provides that, subject to
certain exceptions or as consented to in writing by Parent,
during the period from the signing of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger,
the Hiland Parties, among other things, will, and will cause
their subsidiaries to,
|
|
|
|
|
conduct their business in the ordinary course consistent with
past practices;
|
|
|
|
use commercially reasonable efforts to (i) maintain and
preserve intact their business organization and material rights
and franchises, (ii) retain the services of their current
officers and employees and consultants and (iii) maintain
and preserve in all material respects their relationships with
customers, suppliers and others having business dealings with
them; and
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
take no action that would materially adversely affect or delay
the ability of any of the parties to the Hiland Partners merger
agreement from obtaining any necessary approvals of any
regulatory agency or other governmental entity required for the
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement, performing its covenants and agreements under the
Hiland Partners merger agreement or consummating the
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement, or that would otherwise materially delay or prohibit
consummation of the Hiland Partners merger or other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger agreement.
|
Specifically, the Hiland Parties agreed, subject to certain
exceptions or as consented to in writing by Parent (whose
consent may not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed) not to (and cause any of their subsidiaries not to) do,
or agree to do, any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
make any changes in any of their organizational or governing
documents, other than changes expressly provided for in the
Hiland Partners merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
issue, deliver or sell or authorize, or propose the issuance,
delivery or sale of, any interests or equity securities in
Hiland Partners or its subsidiaries or securities convertible
into interests or equity securities in Hiland Partners or its
subsidiaries or subscriptions, rights, warrants or options to
acquire or other agreements or commitments of any character
obligating them to issue any such interests or equity securities
in Hiland Partners or its subsidiaries, other than restricted
common units, phantom units or unit options granted to current
or new employees under the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan in a manner consistent with past practice of up
to 50,000 Hiland Partners common units in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
except for any distributions from Hiland Partners
subsidiaries to Hiland Partners, declare, set aside or pay any
distributions in respect of interests in Hiland Partners or
other ownership interests, or split, combine or reclassify any
of the interest in Hiland Partners or other ownership interests
or issue or authorize the issuance of any other interests in
Hiland Partners or other ownership interests in respect of, in
lieu of or in substitution for any of the interests in Hiland
Partners or other ownership interests, or purchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of the interests
in Hiland Partners or other ownership interests other than
repurchases of interests in Hiland Partners in accordance with
the Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
merge into or with any other entity;
|
|
|
|
make any acquisition of, capital contribution to or investment
in assets or stock of any person, whether by way of merger,
consolidation, tender offer, share exchange or other activity
other than as provided for in the Hiland Partners 2009
annual budget, which we refer to in this joint proxy statement
as the Hiland Partners budget, and other than:
|
|
|
|
|
|
ordinary-course overnight investments consistent with past cash
management practices;
|
|
|
|
investments in wholly owned subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
investments in an entity which is not a subsidiary, but in which
Hiland Partners owns less than a 100% interest, as of the date
of the Hiland Partners merger agreement as required under the
governing documents of such partially-owned entities;
|
|
|
|
investments by the general partner of Hiland Partners in Hiland
Partners pursuant to the Hiland Partners partnership
agreement; and
|
|
|
|
acquisitions, capital contributions or investments in addition
to those contemplated in the four bullet-points above up to an
aggregate amount of $1,000,000; provided that the aggregate
amount of consideration for such acquisitions, capital
contributions or investments contemplated by the four
bullet-points above may not exceed $2,000,000 in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
enter into, amend in any material way or terminate any material
contract or agreement, or waive any material rights under any
material agreement, other than in the ordinary course of
business and consistent with past practice or as otherwise
permitted under the Hiland Partners merger agreement;
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
acquire or lease assets or properties, individually or in a
series of transactions, with a cost in excess of $250,000 other
than as provided for in the Hiland Partners budget or other
provision of the Hiland Partners merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
incur, assume or guarantee any indebtedness for borrowed money,
issue, assume or guarantee any debt securities, grant any
option, warrant or right to purchase any debt securities, or
issue any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any
debt securities other than in connection with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings in the ordinary course of business or provided for in
the Hiland Partners budget, in each case in accordance with any
existing bank credit facilities;
|
|
|
|
the refinancing or replacement of existing indebtedness
(provided that such refinancing or replacement is on
substantially comparable terms);
|
|
|
|
other than as permitted in the two bullet-points above, the
incurrence by Hiland Partners of up to $1,000,000 in principal
amount of indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
a transaction that is permitted by other provisions of the
Hiland Partners merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, sell, assign, transfer, abandon,
lease or otherwise dispose of assets having a fair market value
in excess of $1,000,000 in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
grant any security interest with respect to, pledge or otherwise
encumber any assets other than permitted encumbrances under the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and security interests granted
after June 1, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
with respect to assets acquired after June 1, 2009 as
permitted under the Hiland Partners merger agreement; or
|
|
|
|
with respect to assets already owned prior to June 1, 2009,
pursuant to the requirements of existing financial arrangements;
|
|
|
|
|
|
settle any claims, demands, lawsuits or state or federal
regulatory proceedings for damages to the extent such
settlements in the aggregate assess damages in excess of
$1,000,000, other than any claims, demands, lawsuits or
proceedings to the extent insured (net of deductibles), to the
extent reserved against in the financial statements of Hiland
Partners or to the extent covered by an indemnity obligation not
subject to dispute or adjustment from a solvent indemnitor;
|
|
|
|
settle any claims, demands, lawsuits or state or federal
regulatory proceedings seeking an injunction or other equitable
relief where such settlements would have a material adverse
affect on the Hiland Parties, as defined in the Hiland Partners
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
except as disclosed to the HLND Parent Parties by Hiland
Partners or as required on an emergency basis or for the safety
of persons or the environment, make any capital expenditure in
excess of $1,000,000 in the aggregate, unless otherwise
permitted by the Hiland Partners merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
make any material change in their tax methods, principles or
elections;
|
|
|
|
make any material change to their financial reporting and
accounting methods other than as required by a change in GAAP;
|
|
|
|
grant any increases in the compensation of any of their
executive officers, except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or as required by the terms of an
existing employee benefit plan or agreement or by applicable law;
|
|
|
|
amend any existing employment or severance or termination
contract with any executive officer;
|
|
|
|
become obligated under any new pension plan, welfare plan,
multiemployer plan, employee benefit plan, severance plan,
change of control or other benefit arrangement or similar plan
or arrangement or amend any existing employee benefit plan, if
such amendment would have the effect of materially enhancing any
benefits thereunder; or
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
voluntarily dissolve or otherwise adopt or vote to adopt a plan
of complete or partial dissolution or liquidation.
|
Provided, however, that any action taken or omitted to be taken
by an officer of a Hiland Party at the direction of any of the
HLND Parent Parties or Mr. Hamm (other than (1) in his
capacity as part of, (2) in accordance with authority
delegated to him by, or (3) as otherwise authorized by, the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors or any committee thereof)
that would otherwise constitute a breach of the Conduct of
Business covenants described in this section, will not
constitute a breach of the Hiland Partners merger agreement
Other
Covenants and Agreements
Investigation
The Hiland Parties must afford to the HLND Parent Parties and
their advisors reasonable access during normal business hours
after reasonable prior notice, during the period prior to the
effective time of the Hiland Partners merger, to the offices,
properties, books and records of the Hiland Parties and their
subsidiaries and provide to the HLND Parent Parties such
financial and other data as they may reasonably request related
to the Hiland Parties and their subsidiaries, including
furnishing to Parent the financial results of Hiland Partners
and its subsidiaries in advance of any filing by Hiland Partners
with the SEC or other public disclosure containing financial
results. The Hiland Parties also agreed to instruct their
employees and advisors to cooperate with Parent in its
investigations described in this paragraph. The Hiland Parties
are not required to furnish information to Parent to the extent
such information is privileged or the furnishing of such
information is prohibited by law or an existing contract or
agreement.
Parent will hold, and will cause its advisors to hold, any
material or competitively sensitive non-public information
concerning the Hiland Parties or their subsidiaries
confidential. The general partner of Hiland Partners was
obligated to, and has, provided Parent (solely for informational
purposes) the fairness opinion of Jefferies & Company
prepared in connection with the Hiland Partners merger.
No
Solicitation
The Hiland Parties may not, and must cause their officers,
directors, employees, agents and representatives (their
representatives) not to, and must use their
reasonable best efforts to cause each of the subsidiaries of
Hiland Partners and their representatives not to, directly or
indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage (including by providing
information) or knowingly facilitate any inquiries, proposals or
offers with respect to, or make or complete, an alternative
proposal (as defined below);
|
|
|
|
engage or participate in any negotiations concerning, or provide
or cause to be provided any non-public information or data
relating to, the Hiland Parties and their subsidiaries, in
connection with, or have any discussions with any person
relating to, an alternative proposal, or otherwise knowingly
encourage or knowingly facilitate any effort or attempt to make
or implement an alternative proposal;
|
|
|
|
approve, endorse or recommend, or propose publicly to approve,
endorse or recommend, any alternative proposal;
|
|
|
|
approve, endorse or recommend, or propose to approve, endorse or
recommend, or execute or enter into, any letter of intent,
agreement in principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement,
option agreement or other similar agreement relating to any
alternative proposal;
|
|
|
|
amend, terminate, waive or fail to enforce, or grant any consent
under, any confidentiality, standstill or similar agreement;
|
|
|
|
take, encourage or facilitate any of the above actions in
connection with the Hiland Holdings merger and any alternatives
thereto; or
|
|
|
|
resolve to propose or agree to do any of the above.
|
140
In addition, upon the signing of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement, the Hiland Parties and their representatives were
obligated, and agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to
cause each of their subsidiaries and their representatives to,
immediately cease any existing solicitations, discussions or
negotiations with any person (other than the HLND Parent
Parties) that had made or indicated an intention to make an
alternative proposal. The Hiland Parties agreed to promptly, and
in any event not later than ten days following the date the
Hiland Partners merger agreement was signed, request that each
person who had executed a confidentiality agreement with a
Hiland Party in connection with that persons consideration
of a transaction involving any Hiland Party or any subsidiary of
a Hiland Party that would constitute an alternative proposal
return or destroy all non-public information furnished to that
person by or on behalf of the Hiland Parties.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to approval of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and Hiland Partners merger by the
unitholders as required in the Hiland Partners merger agreement,
the Hiland Parties may, in response to an unsolicited
alternative proposal which did not result from or arise in
connection with a breach of the no solicitation covenant
described in the first paragraph under No
Solicitation above and which the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee determines, in good faith, after consultation with its
outside counsel and financial advisors, constitutes or could
reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal (as
defined below):
|
|
|
|
|
furnish information with respect to the Hiland Parties and their
subsidiaries to the person making such alternative proposal and
its representatives pursuant to an executed confidentiality
agreement no less restrictive (including with respect to
standstill provisions) of the other party than the form of
confidentiality agreement attached as an exhibit to the Hiland
Partners merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
participate in discussions or negotiations with such person and
its representatives regarding such alternative proposal.
|
In this case, Parent is entitled to receive an executed copy of
such confidentiality agreement prior to or substantially
simultaneously with the Hiland Parties furnishing information to
the person making such alternative proposal or its
representatives. Additionally, the Hiland Parties must
simultaneously provide or make available to Parent any
non-public information concerning the Hiland Parties and their
subsidiaries that is provided to the person making such
alternative proposal or its representatives, which was not
previously provided or made available to Parent.
The Hiland Parties also agreed to promptly (and in any event
within 24 hours) advise Parent orally and in writing of the
receipt by either of them of any alternative proposal or any
request for non-public information relating to the Hiland
Parties and their subsidiaries, other than requests for
information in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice and not reasonably expected to be related to an
alternative proposal, including in each case the identity of the
person making any such alternative proposal or request and the
material terms and conditions of any such alternative proposal
or request (including copies of any document or correspondence
evidencing such alternative proposal or request).
The Hiland Parties must keep Parent reasonably informed on a
current basis of the status (including any material change to
the terms thereof) of any such alternative proposal or request.
Neither the Hiland Partners Board of Directors nor any committee
thereof may withdraw, modify or qualify in a manner adverse to
Parent, or resolve to or publicly propose to withdraw, modify or
qualify in a manner adverse to Parent, its recommendation to the
common unitholders to approve the Hiland Partners merger,
unless, prior to the receipt of the requisite approval of the
holders of Hiland Partners common units as required under the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
partnership agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Partners Board of Directors or the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee determines in good faith, after consultation
with its respective outside counsel and financial advisors, that
a change in its recommendation would be in the best interests of
the holders of Hiland Partners common units (other than the
general partner of Hiland Partners and its affiliates, including
Hiland Holdings); and
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Partners Board of Directors or the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee, as applicable, provides Parent with at
least three business days advance written notice of its
intention to change its recommendation and specifying the
material events giving rise thereto, then the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors or the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee,
as applicable, may change its recommendation.
|
The restrictions summarized above are inapplicable to any
discussions or negotiations with the lenders under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement regarding debt financing transactions
with such lenders that may involve equity issuances that would
constitute an alternative proposal. In addition, nothing
contained in the Hiland Partners merger agreement prohibits the
Hiland Parties or the Hiland Partners Board of Directors or any
committee thereof from disclosing to the Hiland Partners
unitholders a position in response to any tender offer as
required by the SEC.
As used in the Hiland Partners merger agreement,
alternative proposal means any inquiry, proposal or
offer from any person or group of persons other than the HLND
Parent Parties, relating to, or that could reasonably be
expected to lead to, in one transaction or a series of related
transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
a merger, tender or exchange offer, consolidation,
reorganization, reclassification, recapitalization, liquidation
or dissolution, or other business combination involving any
Hiland Party or any of their subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
the issuance by the Hiland Partners of any general partner
interest or any class of partnership interests constituting more
than 15% of such class of partnership interests; or
|
|
|
|
the acquisition in any manner, directly or indirectly, of any
general partner interest, any class of partnership interests
constituting more than 15% of such class of partnership
interests or more than 15% of the consolidated total assets of
the Hiland Parties and their subsidiaries (including equity
interests in any subsidiary or partially owned entity of Hiland
Partners), in each case other than the Hiland Partners merger
and the Hiland Holdings Merger.
|
As used in the Hiland Partners merger agreement, superior
proposal shall mean any written alternative proposal:
|
|
|
|
|
on terms which the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee
determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and financial advisors, to be more favorable from
a financial point of view to the holders of Hiland Partners
common units (other than the general partner of Hiland Partners
and its affiliates, including Hiland Holdings); and
|
|
|
|
that is reasonably capable of being completed, taking into
account all financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects of
such proposal; provided that for purposes of the definition
Superior Proposal, the references to 15%
in the definition of Alternative Proposal shall be
deemed to be references to 55%.
|
In determining if a proposal is more favorable, from a financial
point of view to the holders of Hiland Partners common units
than the Hiland Partners merger, the Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee may not consider any interests that any holder may
have other than as a unitholder of Hiland Partners entitled to
the Hiland Partners merger consideration and will take into
account all the terms and conditions of such proposal, and the
Hiland Partners merger agreement (including any proposal or
offer by the HLND Parent Parties to amend the terms of the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners merger).
Filings
and Other Actions
Upon signing of the Hiland Partners merger agreement, the Hiland
Parties were obligated to prepare and file this joint proxy
statement as soon as reasonably practicable. The Hiland Parties
and Parent were obligated to prepare and file the
Schedule 13E-3
as soon as reasonably practicable and both parties are obligated
to use their commercially reasonable efforts to have this joint
proxy statement and the
Schedule 13E-3
cleared by the SEC as promptly as practicable after such filing.
142
Additionally, the Hiland Parties agreed to:
|
|
|
|
|
take all action necessary in accordance with applicable laws and
the Hiland Partners partnership agreement to duly call, give
notice of, convene and hold a meeting of the Hiland Partners
unitholders as promptly as reasonably practicable following the
mailing of this joint proxy statement for the purpose of
obtaining the necessary unitholder approvals under the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners partnership
agreement of the Hiland Partners merger and the Hiland Partners
merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
unless there is a change in the recommendation of the Hiland
Partners Board of Directors or Hiland Partners Conflicts
Committee, use all commercially reasonable efforts to solicit
from Hiland Partners unitholders proxies in favor of the
adoption and approval of the Hiland Partners merger agreement
and the Hiland Partners merger.
|
Unless the Hiland Partners merger agreement is terminated
pursuant to its terms, the Hiland Parties must take all of the
actions described in the first bullet point in the previous
paragraph regardless of whether or not there has been a change
in the recommendation of the Hiland Partners Board of Directors
or the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee.
Equity
Awards
The Hiland Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan and each award
of restricted units (except awards held by nonemployee members
of the Board of Directors as described in
Effect of the Merger on the Common Units and
Certain Other Securities of Hiland Partners and Merger Sub
above), phantom units and options outstanding under the Hiland
Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan immediately prior to the
effective time of the Hiland Partners merger will remain
outstanding in accordance with its terms as a plan or equity
compensation award, as applicable, of the surviving entity and
shall be unaffected by the transactions contemplated by the
Hiland Partners merger agreement. Hiland Partners has agreed to
take any action necessary pursuant to the Hiland Partners, LP
Long-Term Incentive Plan to achieve this result.
Efforts
to Complete the Hiland Partners Merger
The HLND Parent Parties and the Hiland Parties shall, and the
Hiland Parties shall cause the subsidiaries of Hiland Partners
and partially owned entities to, use their commercially
reasonable efforts (subject to, and in accordance with,
applicable law) to take promptly, or to cause to be taken, all
actions, and to do promptly, or to cause to be done, and to
assist and to cooperate with the other parties in doing, all
things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make
effective the Hiland Partners merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger agreement including:
|
|
|
|
|
the obtaining of all necessary actions or nonactions, waivers,
consents and approvals from governmental entities and the making
of all necessary registrations and filings and the taking of all
steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval or waiver from,
or to avoid an action or proceeding by, any governmental entity;
|
|
|
|
the obtaining of all necessary consents, approvals or waivers
from third parties;
|
|
|
|
the defending of any lawsuits or other legal proceedings,
whether judicial or administrative, challenging the Hiland
Partners merger agreement or the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby; and
|
|
|
|
the execution and delivery of any additional instruments
reasonably necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby.
|
In addition, Parent is obligated to use its reasonable best
efforts to obtain the funding for the Hiland Partners merger in
accordance with the funding commitment letters provided by
Mr. Hamm to Parent and described in Special
Factors Financing of the Mergers, beginning on
page 124.
143
The Hiland Parties and the HLND Parent Parties have agreed to:
|
|
|
|
|
make their respective filings and thereafter make any other
required submissions under the HSR Act;
|
|
|
|
use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other
in determining whether any filings are required to be made with,
or consents, permits, authorizations, waivers or approvals are
required to be obtained from, any third parties or other
governmental entities in connection with the execution and
delivery of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby;
|
|
|
|
use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other
in timely making all such filings and timely seeking all such
consents, permits, authorizations or approvals;
|
|
|
|
use commercially reasonable efforts to take, or to cause to be
taken, all other actions and to do, or to cause to be done, all
other things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and
make effective the Hiland Partners merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement, including taking all such further action as
reasonably may be necessary to resolve such objections, if any,
any federal, state or foreign antitrust enforcement authorities
or competition authorities or other governmental entities may
assert in connection with the HSR Act, or other state or federal
regulatory authorities of any other nation or other jurisdiction
or any other person may assert under regulatory law with respect
to the Hiland Partners merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger agreement, and to
avoid or eliminate each and every impediment under any law that
may be asserted by any governmental entity with respect to the
Hiland Partners merger so as to enable the closing to occur as
soon as reasonably possible; and
|
|
|
|
subject to applicable legal limitations and the instructions of
any governmental entity, use commercially reasonable efforts to
keep each other apprised of the status of matters relating to
the completion of the transactions contemplated by the Hiland
Partners merger agreement, including to the extent permitted by
law promptly furnishing the other with copies of notices or
other communications received by the Hiland Parties or any of
their subsidiaries or the HLND Parent Parties, as the case may
be, from any third party
and/or any
governmental entity with respect thereto.
|
The Hiland Parties and the HLND Parent Parties agreed that, if
any administrative or judicial action or proceeding, including
any proceeding by a private party, is instituted (or threatened
to be instituted) challenging the Hiland Partners merger or any
other transaction contemplated by this Hiland Partners merger
agreement, each of the Hiland Parties or the HLND Parent Parties
shall cooperate in all respects with each other and shall use
their respective commercially reasonable efforts to contest and
resist any such action or proceeding and to have vacated,
lifted, reversed or overturned any decree, judgment, injunction
or other order, whether temporary, preliminary or permanent,
that is in effect and that prohibits, prevents or restricts
consummation of the Hiland Partners merger or any other
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement.
The HLND Parent Parties and the Hiland Parties have agreed that
any of the parties to the Hiland Partners merger agreement may,
as each deems advisable and necessary, reasonably designate any
competitively sensitive material provided to the other under the
covenant described in this section as material that may be given
only to the outside regulatory counsel of the recipient and not
disclosed by such outside counsel to employees, officers or
directors of the recipient unless express written permission is
obtained in advance from the source of the materials (the HLND
Parent Parties or the Hiland Parties as the case may be) or its
legal counsel. Materials provided to the other party or its
outside counsel may be redacted to remove references concerning
the valuation of the Hiland Partners common units or the
business of the Hiland Parties and their subsidiaries.
Takeover
Statute
If any fair price, moratorium,
control share acquisition or other form of
anti-takeover statute or regulation shall become applicable to
the Hiland Partners merger or the other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger agreement or the
Hiland Partners support agreement or the Hiland Partners
144
commitment letter, each of the Hiland Parties or the HLND Parent
Parties have agreed to grant such approvals and take such
actions as are reasonably necessary so that the Hiland Partners
merger, the Hiland Partners support agreement or the Hiland
Partners commitment letter, and the other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger agreement and thereby
may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the terms
contemplated in the Hiland Partners merger agreement and
otherwise act to eliminate or minimize the effects of such
statute or regulation on the Hiland Partners merger, the Hiland
Partners support agreement or the Hiland Partners commitment
letter, and the other transactions contemplated hereby and
thereby.
Public
Announcements
The Hiland Parties and the HLND Parent Parties have agreed to
consult with and provide each other the opportunity to review
and comment (which shall be considered reasonably and in good
faith by the other parties) upon any press release or other
public statement or comment prior to the issuance of such press
release or other public statement or comment relating to the
Hiland Partners merger agreement or the transactions
contemplated therein and shall not issue any such press release
or other public statement or comment prior to such consultation
and opportunity to review and comment except as may be required
by applicable law or by obligations pursuant to any listing
agreement with any national securities exchange. Any public
statement or disclosure that is consistent with a public
statement or disclosure previously approved by the other party
shall not, however, require the prior approval of such other
party.
Indemnification
and Insurance
The partnership agreement of the surviving entity shall not,
with respect to indemnification of directors and officers, be
amended, repealed or otherwise modified after the effective time
of the Hiland Partners merger in any manner that would adversely
affect the rights thereunder of the persons who at any time
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger were
identified as prospective indemnitees under the Hiland Partners
partnership agreement in respect of actions or omissions
occurring at or prior to the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger (including the transactions contemplated by the
Hiland Partners merger agreement).
For a period of six years after the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger, Parent and the general partner of Hiland
Partners shall, and Parent and the general partner of Hiland
Partners shall cause the surviving entity (and its successors or
assigns) to, maintain officers and directors
liability insurance covering each person who is immediately
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger, or
has been at any time prior to the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger, an officer or director of any of the Hiland
Parties or their subsidiaries and each person who immediately
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger is
serving or prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners
merger has served at the request of any of the Hiland Parties or
their subsidiaries as a director, officer, trustee or fiduciary
of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust,
pension or other employee benefit plan of the Hiland Parties or
their subsidiaries who are or at any time prior to the effective
time were covered by the existing officers and
directors liability insurance applicable to the Hiland
Parties or their subsidiaries on terms substantially no less
advantageous to the indemnified persons described in this
paragraph than such existing insurance with respect to acts or
omissions, or alleged acts or omissions, prior to the effective
time of the Hiland Partners merger (whether claims, actions or
other proceedings relating thereto are commenced, asserted or
claimed before or after the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger).
Hiland Partners shall cause (and Parent, following the closing
of the Hiland Partners merger, shall continue to cause) coverage
to be extended under the existing officers and
directors liability insurance applicable to the Hiland
Parties or their subsidiaries by obtaining a six-year
tail policy on terms and conditions no less
advantageous than the existing officers and
directors liability insurance, and such tail
policy shall satisfy the requirements summarized in this
section. In no event, however, will Parent be required to spend
more than 250% of the last annual premium paid by the Hiland
Parties and their subsidiaries prior to the signing date of the
Hiland Partners merger agreement per policy year of coverage
under such tail policy. If the cost per policy year
of such insurance exceeds 250% of the last annual premium,
Parent shall purchase
145
as much coverage per policy year as reasonably obtainable for
the amount equal to 250% of the last annual premium.
In the event Parent, the general partner of Hiland Partners or
any of their respective successors or assigns:
|
|
|
|
|
consolidates with or merges into any other person and shall not
be the continuing or surviving entity in such consolidation or
merger; or
|
|
|
|
transfers all or substantially all of its properties and assets
to any person
|
then and in either such case, Parent or the general partner of
Hiland Partners, as the case may be, shall cause proper
provision to be made so that its successors or assigns shall
assume the obligations summarized in this Indemnification
and Insurance section.
Unitholder
Litigation
The Hiland Parties have agreed to give Parent the opportunity to
participate in the defense or settlement of any unitholder
litigation against any of the Hiland Parties or their
subsidiaries
and/or their
respective directors relating to the Hiland Partners merger or
any other transactions contemplated in the Hiland Partners
merger agreement and not to agree to any settlement shall
without Parents consent (which shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed).
Notification
of Certain Matters
The Hiland Parties and the HLND Parent Parties have agreed to
give prompt notice to each other of:
|
|
|
|
|
any notice or other communication received by such party from
any governmental entity in connection with the Hiland Partners
merger or the other transactions contemplated in the Hiland
Partners merger agreement or from any person alleging that the
consent of such person is or may be required in connection with
the Hiland Partners merger or the other transactions
contemplated in the Hiland Partners merger agreement, if the
subject matter of such communication or the failure of such
party to obtain such consent could be material to Hiland
Partners, the surviving entity or Parent,
|
|
|
|
any actions, suits, claims, investigations or proceedings
commenced or, to such partys knowledge, threatened
against, relating to or involving or otherwise affecting such
party or any of its subsidiaries which relate to the Hiland
Partners merger or the other transactions contemplated in the
Hiland Partners merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
the discovery of any fact or circumstance that, or the
occurrence or non-occurrence of any event the occurrence or
non-occurrence of which, would, individually or in the
aggregate, cause or result in a material adverse effect to the
Hiland Parties or the HLND Parent Parties.
|
The Hiland Parties shall reasonably cooperate with the HLND
Parent Parties in efforts to mitigate any adverse consequences
to the HLND Parent Parties which may arise from any criminal or
regulatory investigation or action involving any of the Hiland
Parties or their subsidiaries (including by coordinating and
providing assistance in meeting with regulators).
Rule 16b-3
Prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger,
Hiland Partners has agreed to take such steps as may be
reasonably requested by any party to the Hiland Partners merger
agreement to cause dispositions of Hiland Partners equity
securities (including derivative securities) pursuant to the
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement by each individual who is a director or officer of the
general partner of Hiland Partners to be exempt from short-swing
profits liability under the Exchange Act.
146
Conditions
to Completion of the Hiland Partners Merger
The obligations of the Hiland Parties and the HLND Parent
Parties to effect the Hiland Partners merger shall be subject to
the fulfillment or waiver by all parties, at or prior to the
effective time of the Hiland Partners merger, of each of the
following mutual conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the approval of the holders of (i) a majority of the
outstanding common units of Hiland Partners (excluding common
units owned by Hiland Partners general partner, its
affiliates, including Hiland Holdings, and the directors and
officers of Hiland Partners) entitled to vote thereon and
(ii) a majority of the outstanding subordinated units of
Hiland Partners entitled to vote thereon to approve the Hiland
Partners merger agreement must be obtained;
|
|
|
|
no restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or
other order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or
other legal restraint or prohibition enacted or promulgated by
any governmental entity restraining, enjoining or otherwise
prohibiting the consummation of the Hiland Partners merger shall
be in effect; and
|
|
|
|
any waiting period under the HSR Act applicable to the
consummation of the Hiland Partners merger shall have expired or
been earlier terminated.
|
The obligations of the Hiland Parties to effect the Hiland
Partners merger are further subject to the fulfillment at or
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger of
each of the following conditions, any one or more of which may
be waived in whole or in part by the Hiland Parties:
|
|
|
|
|
(1) the representations and warranties of the HLND Parent
Parties as to qualification, organization, authority, no
violation, and consents and approvals shall be true and correct
in all respects, in each case at and as of the date of the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and at and as of the closing as
though made at and as of the closing date and (2) the
representations and warranties of the HLND Parent Parties set
forth in the Hiland Partners merger agreement (other than those
referenced in clause (1) of this paragraph) shall be true
and correct in all respects (disregarding any materiality or
Parent material adverse effect qualifiers therein) at and as of
the date of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and at and as
of the closing as though made at and as of the closing, except
where any failures of such representations or warranties to be
so true and correct would not have, individually or in the
aggregate, a material adverse effect on Parent; provided,
however, that, with respect to clauses (1) and (2) of
this paragraph, representations and warranties that are made as
of a particular date or period shall be true and correct (in the
manner set forth in clause (1) or (2), as applicable) only
as of such date or period;
|
|
|
|
the HLND Parent Parties shall have performed all obligations and
complied with all covenants required by the Hiland Partners
merger agreement to be performed or complied with by them that
are qualified by materiality or a material adverse effect
qualifier and shall have in all material respects performed all
other obligations and complied with all other covenants required
by the Hiland Partners merger agreement to be performed or
complied with by them; and
|
|
|
|
Parent shall have delivered to the Hiland Parties a certificate,
dated the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger and
signed by its Chief Executive Officer or another senior
executive officer, certifying to the effect that the conditions
set forth in the first two bullet points above have been
satisfied.
|
The obligations of the HLND Parent Parties to effect the Hiland
Partners merger are further subject to the fulfillment at or
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners merger of
each of the following conditions, any one or more of which may
be waived in whole or in part by the HLND Parent Parties:
|
|
|
|
|
(1) the representations and warranties of the Hiland
Parties as to qualification, organization, subsidiaries,
capitalization, authority, no violation, consents and approvals,
absence of certain changes or events, required approvals and
material contracts shall be true and correct in all respects,
except, in the case of the representation as to capitalization,
for such inaccuracies as are de minimis in the aggregate,
in each case at and as of the date of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and at and as of the closing date as though made at
and as of the closing date and (2) the representations and
warranties of the Hiland Parties set forth in the Hiland
Partners merger agreement (other than those referenced in
clause (1) of
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
this paragraph) shall be true and correct in all respects
(disregarding any materiality or Hiland material adverse effect
qualifiers therein) as of the date of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and at and as of the closing date as though made at
and as of the closing date, except where any failures of such
representations or warranties to be so true and correct would
not have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on the Hiland Parties; provided, however, that, with
respect to clauses (1) and (2) of this paragraph,
representations and warranties that are made as of a particular
date or period shall be true and correct (in the manner set
forth in clause (1) or (2), as applicable) only as of such
date or period; provided, further, that the representations and
warranties referenced in clauses (1) and (2) shall not
be deemed to be inaccurate to the extent that Parent had
knowledge on the date of the Hiland Partners merger agreement of
such inaccuracy;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Parties shall have performed all obligations and
complied with all covenants required by the Hiland Partners
merger agreement to be performed or complied with by them that
are qualified by materiality or a Hiland material adverse effect
qualifier and shall have in all material respects performed all
other obligations and complied with all other covenants required
by the Hiland Partners merger agreement to be performed or
complied with by them;
|
|
|
|
since the date of the Hiland Partners merger agreement there
shall not have been any material adverse effect on the Hiland
Parties;
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings merger shall be effectuated concurrently
with the Hiland Partners merger; provided that the HLND Parent
Parties may not waive this condition unless the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger shall have been
submitted to a vote of unitholders and the outcome of such vote
shall not have constituted the unitholder approval required
under the Hiland Holdings partnership agreement and the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement, described in The Hiland
Holdings Merger Agreement Conditions to Completion
of the Hiland Holdings Merger, beginning on
page 165; and
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Parties shall have delivered to the HLND Parent
Parties a certificate, dated the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger and signed by an executive officer of Hiland
Partners, certifying to the effect that the conditions set forth
in the first three bullet points of this paragraph have been
satisfied.
|
No party to the Hiland Partners merger agreement may rely on the
failure of any condition summarized in this section to be
satisfied if such failure was caused by such partys breach
in any material respect of any provision of the Hiland Partners
merger agreement or failure to use commercially reasonable
efforts to consummate the Hiland Partners merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement.
Termination
The Hiland Partners merger agreement may be terminated and
abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the Hiland
Partners merger, whether before or after any approval of the
matters presented in connection with the Hiland Partners merger
by the unitholders of Hiland Partners:
|
|
|
|
|
by the mutual written consent of the Hiland Parties and the HLND
Parent Parties;
|
|
|
|
by either the Hiland Parties or the HLND Parent Parties, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Partners merger shall not have become effective on or
before November 1, 2009 and the party seeking to terminate
the Hiland Partners merger agreement shall not have breached its
obligations under the Hiland Partners merger agreement in any
manner that shall have proximately caused the failure to
consummate the Hiland Partners merger on or before
November 1, 2009;
|
|
|
|
an injunction, other legal restraint or order of any
governmental entity shall have been entered permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation
of the Hiland Partners merger and such injunction, other legal
restraint or order shall have become final and nonappealable;
provided that the party seeking to terminate this Agreement
shall have complied in all material
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
respects with its obligations summarized under
Efforts to Complete the Hiland Partners
Merger above; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
the special meeting of the unitholders of Hiland Partners shall
have concluded and, upon a vote taken at such meeting, the
requisite unitholder approval of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement or the Hiland Partners merger shall not have been
obtained; provided that the right to terminate the Hiland
Partners merger agreement shall not be available to the Hiland
Parties if any Hiland Party materially breached any obligations
summarized under No Solicitation and
Filings and Other Actions above;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the Hiland Parties, if any HLND Parent Party shall have
breached or failed to perform any of its representations,
warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the
Hiland Partners merger agreement, which breach or failure to
perform:
|
|
|
|
|
|
would constitute the failure of a condition to the Hiland
Parties obligations to complete the Hiland Partners
merger; and
|
|
|
|
is not capable of being satisfied or cured by November 1,
2009 or, if capable of being satisfied or cured, is not
satisfied or cured by thirty days following receipt by Parent of
written notice stating the Hiland Parties intention to
terminate the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the basis for
such termination;
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided that the right to terminate the Hiland Partners merger
agreement pursuant to the provision summarized in this paragraph
shall not be available to the Hiland Parties if, at such time, a
condition to the HLND Parent Parties obligation to
complete the merger is not capable of being satisfied; or
|
|
|
|
by the HLND Parent Parties, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
any Hiland Party shall have breached or failed to perform any of
its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements
contained in the Hiland Partners merger agreement, which breach
or failure to perform: (A) would constitute the failure of
a condition to the HLND Parent Parties obligations to
complete the merger and (B) is not capable of being
satisfied or cured by November 1, 2009 or, if capable of
being satisfied or cured, is not satisfied or cured by thirty
days following receipt by the Hiland Parties of written notice
stating the HLND Parent Parties intention to terminate the
Hiland Partners merger agreement and the basis for such
termination; provided that the right to terminate the Hiland
Partners merger agreement pursuant to the provision summarized
in this paragraph shall not be available to the HLND Parent
Parties if, at such time, a condition to the Hiland
Parties obligation to complete the merger is not capable
of being satisfied;
|
|
|
|
a change in the recommendation of the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors or Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee or a failure of
the Hiland Partners Board of Directors to recommend the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and Hiland Partners merger to its
unitholders occurs or the Hiland Partners Board of Directors of
Directors or any committee thereof approves, endorses or
recommends, or resolves to or publicly proposes to approve,
endorse or recommend, any alternative proposal; or
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings merger is not capable of closing by
November 1, 2009.
|
Effect of
Termination; Remedies
In the event of termination of the Hiland Partners merger
agreement as summarized above under
Termination, the Hiland Partners merger
agreement shall terminate, except for certain provisions
including the provision relating to reimbursement of expenses
summarized in Reimbursement of Certain
Expenses below, and there shall be no liability on the
part of the Hiland Parties or the HLND Parent Parties to the
other except as provided in the provision relating to
reimbursement of expenses summarized in
Reimbursement of Certain Expenses below.
No such termination, however, shall relieve any party from
liability arising out of any willful breach of any of the
representations, warranties or covenants in the Hiland Partners
merger agreement (subject to any express limitations set forth
in the Hiland Partners merger
149
agreement), in which case the aggrieved party shall be entitled
to all rights and remedies available at law or in equity.
Reimbursement
of Certain Expenses
In the event that the Hiland Partners merger agreement is
terminated by the HLND Parent Parties due to a change in the
recommendation of the Hiland Partners Board of Directors or the
Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee or:
|
|
|
|
|
an alternative proposal shall have been made known to the Hiland
Parties or shall have been made directly to the Hiland Partners
unitholders generally or any person shall have publicly
announced an intention (whether or not conditional or withdrawn)
to make an alternative proposal and thereafter;
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Partners merger agreement is terminated by the Hiland
Parties or the HLND Parent Parties (as applicable) because
November 1, 2009 has passed, the unitholders of Hiland
Partners failed to approve the Hiland Partners merger agreement
or the Hiland Partners merger or any Hiland Party breached or
failed to perform any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or other agreements contained in the Hiland Partners
merger agreement, which breach or failure to perform:
(A) would constitute the failure of a condition to the HLND
Parent Parties obligations to complete the merger and
(B) is not capable of being satisfied or cured by
November 1, 2009 or, if capable of being satisfied or
cured, is not satisfied or cured by thirty days following
receipt by the Hiland Parties of written notice stating the HLND
Parent Parties intention to terminate the Hiland Partners
merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
a Hiland Party or its subsidiary enters into a definitive
agreement with respect to, or consummates, a transaction
contemplated by any alternative proposal within twelve months of
the date the Hiland Partners merger agreement is terminated,
|
then Hiland Partners shall pay to Parent all of the expenses of
the HLND Parent Parties, up to $1,100,000; provided that, no
expense for which a Parent Party has received reimbursement
pursuant to the Hiland Holdings merger agreement shall be paid.
See The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement
Reimbursement of Certain Expenses, beginning on
page 168.
Any payment required to be made pursuant to the provision
summarized in the prior paragraph shall be made to Parent not
later than two business days after delivery to Hiland Partners
of an itemization setting forth in reasonable detail all
expenses of the HLND Parent Parties for which reimbursement is
sought (which itemization may be supplemented and updated from
time to time by Parent until the sixtieth day after delivery of
such notice of demand for payment). All such payments shall be
made by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an
account to be designated by Parent.
Specific
Performance
The parties to the Hiland Partners merger agreement have agreed
that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any
provisions of the Hiland Partners merger agreement were not
performed in accordance with their specific terms or were
otherwise breached. Accordingly, prior to termination of the
Hiland Partners merger agreement in accordance with its terms,
the parties will be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to
prevent breaches of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and to
enforce specifically the terms and provisions of the Hiland
Partners merger agreement in addition to any other remedy to
which the parties are entitled at law or in equity. In
connection with any request for specific performance or
equitable relief by any party, each of the other parties agreed
to waive any requirement for the security or posting of any bond
in connection with the remedy of specific performance or
equitable relief. Any actions for specific performance or
equitable relief must be brought in the Delaware Chancery Court
or the federal courts within the State of Delaware.
Amendments
and Waivers
At any time prior to the effective time of the Hiland Partners
merger, any provision of the Hiland Partners merger agreement
may be amended or waived if, and only if, such amendment or
waiver is in writing and
150
signed, in the case of an amendment, by the Hiland Parties and
the HLND Parent Parties, or in the case of a waiver, by the
party against whom the waiver is to be effective; provided,
however, that after receipt of the unitholder approval required
under the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland
Partners merger, if any such amendment or waiver shall by
applicable law or in accordance with the rules and regulations
of the NASDAQ Global Select Market require further approval of
the unitholders of Hiland Partners, the effectiveness of such
amendment or waiver shall be subject to the approval of the
unitholders of Hiland Partners. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
no failure or delay by the Hiland Parties or the HLND Parent
Parties in exercising any right under the Hiland Partners merger
agreement shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single
or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further
exercise of any other right under the Hiland Partners merger
agreement.
Recommendation
The Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee has unanimously
determined that the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the
Hiland Partners merger are advisable, fair to, and in the best
interests of, Hiland Partners and the Hiland Partners public
unitholders and (i) has unanimously recommended to the
Hiland Partners Board of Directors that the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors approve the Hiland Partners merger agreement
and the Hiland Partners merger and (ii) unanimously
recommends that the Hiland Partners public unitholders approve
the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger. The Hiland Partners Board of Directors, after
considering factors, including the unanimous recommendation of
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee, determined that the
Hiland Partners merger agreement is advisable, fair to, and in
the best interests of, Hiland Partners and the Hiland Partners
public unitholders, approved the Hiland Partners merger
agreement and the Hiland Partners merger and recommends that the
Hiland Partners public unitholders vote in favor of the approval
of the Hiland Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Partners
merger. See Special Factors Recommendation of
the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors; Reasons For Recommending Approval of the
Merger.
151
THE
HILAND HOLDINGS MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms of the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement, a copy of which is attached as
Annex A to this joint proxy statement. The provisions of
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement are extensive and not
easily summarized. You should carefully read the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement in its entirety because it, and not this joint
proxy statement, is the legal document that governs the merger.
In addition, you should read Special Factors
Structure and Steps of the Mergers, beginning on
page 122.
This summary of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is included
to provide you with information regarding the terms of the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and is not intended to provide
any other factual information about Hiland Holdings or the other
parties to the Hiland Holdings merger agreement. The Hiland
Holdings merger agreement contains representations and
warranties by each of the parties to the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement. These representations and warranties have been made
solely for the benefit of the other parties to the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and:
|
|
|
|
|
may be intended not as statements of fact, but rather as a way
of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements
prove to be inaccurate,
|
|
|
|
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other
party in connection with the negotiation of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement, which disclosures are not reflected in the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement,
|
|
|
|
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different
from what may be viewed as material to you or other
investors, and
|
|
|
|
were made only as of the date of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and are subject to more recent
developments.
|
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not
describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were
made or at any other time.
Additional information about Hiland Holdings may be found
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and Hiland
Holdings other public filings. Please see Where You
Can Find More Information, beginning on page 191.
Structure
of the Merger
At the closing of the Hiland Holdings merger, HPGP Merger Sub
will merge with and into Hiland Holdings and the separate
existence of HPGP Merger Sub will cease. Hiland Holdings will be
the surviving entity in the Hiland Holdings merger and will
continue to be a Delaware limited partnership after the Hiland
Holdings merger. The Hiland Holdings partnership agreement, as
in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the Hiland
Holdings merger, will be the partnership agreement of the
surviving entity until thereafter changed or amended in
accordance with the provisions of the Hiland Holdings
partnership agreement and applicable law.
When the
Merger Becomes Effective
The closing of the Hiland Holdings merger will take place on a
date to be specified by the parties, which will be no later than
the later of the third business day after the satisfaction or
waiver of the closing conditions stated in the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement (other than those conditions that by their
nature are to be satisfied at the closing, but subject to the
satisfaction or waiver of such conditions), unless another date
is agreed to in writing by the parties. The Hiland Holdings
merger will become effective at the time, which we refer to as
the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger, when Hiland
Holdings files a certificate of merger with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware, or at such later date or time as
Parent and Hiland Holdings agree in writing and specify in the
certificate of merger.
152
Effect of
the Merger on the Common Units and Certain Other Securities of
Hiland Holdings and HPGP Merger Sub
Each common unit of Hiland Holdings (other than common units
owned by the Hamm Continuing Investors and restricted common
units owned by certain employees of Hiland Holdings as described
below which we sometimes refer to as the Hiland Holdings
rollover common unitholders) outstanding immediately prior
to the closing of the Hiland Holdings merger, will be cancelled
and convert automatically into the right to receive $2.40 in
cash. Restricted common units held by non-employee members of
the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors will vest immediately
prior to the effective time and automatically convert into the
right to receive the Hiland Holdings merger consideration.
Other restricted common units, phantom units and unit option
awards issued pursuant to the Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan that remain outstanding as of the effective time
of the Hiland Holdings merger will remain outstanding in
accordance with their respective terms as equity awards in the
surviving entity in the Hiland Holdings merger.
The following partnership interests shall be unaffected and
remain outstanding as partnership interests in the surviving
entity in the Hiland Holdings merger, and their holders will not
receive any consideration as part of the Hiland Holdings merger:
|
|
|
|
|
8,481,350 Hiland Holdings common units owned by Continental Gas
Holdings, Inc. (Continental Gas), an affiliate of
Harold Hamm;
|
|
|
|
2,757,390 Hiland Holdings common units owned by the Harold Hamm
DST Trust (or Bert Harold Mackie, as trustee thereof);
|
|
|
|
1,839,712 Hiland Holdings common units owned by the Harold Hamm
HJ Trust (or Bert Harold Mackie, as trustee thereof);
|
|
|
|
59,600 Hiland Holdings common units owned by Harold
Hamm; and
|
|
|
|
the general partner interest in Hiland Holdings owned by the
general partner of Hiland Holdings.
|
Upon closing of the Hiland Holdings merger, each limited
liability company unit of HPGP Merger Sub outstanding
immediately prior to the closing will automatically convert into
one common unit of the surviving entity.
Payment
for Hiland Holdings Common Units in the Merger
At or prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger,
Parent and HPGP Merger Sub will deposit, or cause to be
deposited
with ,
as paying agent, in trust for the benefit of the holders of
Hiland Holdings common units (other than those holders who will
not receive the Hiland Holdings merger consideration, as
described above), sufficient cash to pay to the Hiland Holdings
common unitholders (other than the Hiland Holdings rollover
common unitholders) the merger consideration of $2.40 per unit.
As soon as reasonably practicable but in any event not later
than five business days following the effective time of the
Hiland Holdings merger, Parent will cause the paying agent to
mail to each record holder of common units of Hiland Holdings
that were converted into the right to receive the Hiland
Holdings merger consideration a letter of transmittal and
instructions for use in effecting the surrender of certificates
that formerly represented common units of Hiland Holdings or
non-certificated common units represented by book-entry in
exchange for the Hiland Holdings merger consideration.
Upon surrender of the certificates or book-entry common units
and a duly completed and validly executed letter of transmittal,
together with any other documents required by the letter of
transmittal or customarily required by the paying agent, a
holder of Hiland Holdings common units will be entitled to
receive a check for the aggregate Hiland Holdings merger
consideration owed to such unitholder. No interest will be paid
or accrue on the Hiland Holdings merger consideration. Parent,
the surviving entity in the Hiland Holdings merger and the
paying agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from the
payment of the Hiland Holdings merger consideration amounts that
are required to be withheld or deducted under applicable tax
laws.
153
No transfers of Hiland Holdings common units will be made on the
unit transfer register of Hiland Holdings from and after the
effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger. In the event of a
transfer of ownership of common units that is not registered in
the unit transfer register of Hiland Holdings a check for any
cash to be paid upon surrender of the certificate formerly
representing those shares may be paid to the transferee if the
certificate is presented to the paying agent with all documents
required to evidence and effect the transfer of the shares and
to evidence that any applicable stock transfer or other taxes
have been paid or are not applicable.
Representations
and Warranties
The Hiland Holdings merger agreement contains representations
and warranties of Hiland Holdings and its general partner (which
we collectively refer to as the Holdings Parties)
and of Parent and HPGP Merger Sub (which we refer to as the
HPGP Parent Parties) as to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
legal organization, existence and good standing, including, as
to the Holdings Parties, with respect to its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
corporate, partnership or similar power and authority to enter
into the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and to consummate the
transaction contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and due authorization of the execution, delivery and performance
of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the consummation of
the Hiland Holdings merger;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain violations, defaults or consent
requirements under certain contracts, organizational documents
and law, in each case arising out of the execution and delivery
of, and consummation of, the transactions contemplated by the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of materially misleading statements or omissions in
required filings with the SEC, or information provided in
connection with required filings with the SEC (including this
joint proxy statement) in connection with the Hiland Holdings
merger;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any fees owed to investment bankers, finders or
brokers in connection with the Hiland Holdings merger, other
than those specified in the Hiland Holdings merger agreement.
|
The Hiland Holdings merger agreement contains representations
and warranties of the Holdings Parties as to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the capitalization of the Holdings Parties and the absence of
certain rights to purchase or acquire equity securities of the
Holdings Parties, the absence of any bonds or other obligations
allowing holders the right to vote with unitholders of the
Holdings Parties and the absence of unitholder agreements or
voting trusts to which the Holdings Parties is a party, other
than those specified in the Hiland Holdings merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the financial statements of Hiland Holdings and its subsidiaries
included or incorporated by reference into Hiland Holdings
SEC filings;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain undisclosed indebtedness liabilities,
other than those incurred or accrued in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practices since December 31,
2008;
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws by the Holdings Parties;
|
|
|
|
the Holdings Parties employee benefit plans and other
agreements with their employees;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain changes since December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain litigation, orders and judgments and
governmental proceedings and investigations related to the
Holdings Parties except as otherwise disclosed to the HPGP
Parent Parties by the Holdings Parties;
|
|
|
|
the payment of taxes, the filing or tax returns and other tax
matters;
|
|
|
|
labor matters related to the Holdings Parties;
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
the assets of the Holdings Parties;
|
|
|
|
the opinion received by the Holdings Parties from Barclays;
|
|
|
|
the required approvals of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings merger, including approval by the Hiland
Holdings unitholders at the special meeting;
|
|
|
|
material contracts of the Holdings Parties and the performance
of obligations thereunder; and
|
|
|
|
the absence of any approval requirements under any state
takeover statutes.
|
The Hiland Holdings merger agreement also contains
representations and warranties of the HPGP Parent Parties as to,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the HPGP Parent Parties ability to finance the Hiland
Holdings merger and certain related costs;
|
|
|
|
the ownership of HPGP Merger Sub and the absence of any previous
business activities by HPGP Merger Sub other than in connection
with the transactions contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the access to information about the Holdings Parties that has
been provided to the HPGP Parent Parties; and
|
|
|
|
the limitation of the Holdings Parties representations and
warranties to those set forth in the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement or in certificates entered into in connection with the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement.
|
Some of the representations and warranties in the merger
agreement are qualified by materiality qualifications or a
material adverse effect clause.
For purposes of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, a
material adverse effect means, with respect to
Hiland Holdings, any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect
or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate with all
other facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or
occurrences, has had or would be reasonably likely to have a
material adverse effect on the assets, liabilities, properties,
business, results of operations or condition (financial or
otherwise) of the Holdings Parties, taken as a whole, or on the
ability of the Holdings Parties to perform their obligations
under the Hiland Holdings merger agreement or to consummate the
Hiland Holdings merger.
In any case, however, a material adverse effect with
respect to Hiland Holdings will not include:
|
|
|
|
|
facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
generally affecting the midstream oil and gas or gathering and
processing industries (including commodity prices);
|
|
|
|
generally affecting the economy or the financial or securities
markets in the United States or globally (including interest
rates); or
|
|
|
|
generally affecting regulatory or political conditions in the
United States or globally,
|
except, with respect to the above three bullet-points, for any
fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence that
affects the assets, liabilities, properties, business, results
of operations or condition (financial or otherwise) of Hiland
Holdings and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in a
disproportionately adverse manner, compared to other
participants in the midstream oil and gas or gathering and
processing industries;
|
|
|
|
|
facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
caused by compliance with the terms of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement (including omissions required by the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement);
|
|
|
|
caused by the announcement or pendency of the Hiland Holdings
merger (including litigation brought by any holder of common
units in Hiland Holdings (on their own behalf or on behalf of
Hiland
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings) or loss of or adverse changes in relationships with
employees, customers or suppliers of Hiland Holdings); or
|
|
|
|
|
|
caused by any action taken or omitted to be taken by an officer
of the general partner of Hiland Partners at the direction of
Parent or HPGP Merger Sub or Harold Hamm (other than (i) in
his capacity as part of, (ii) in accordance with authority
delegated to him by, or (iii) as otherwise authorized by,
the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors or any committee thereof);
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable statutes, regulations, statutory rules,
order, judgments, decrees and terms and conditions of any grant
of approval, permission, authority, permit or license of any
court, governmental entity, statutory body or self-regulatory
authority (including the NASDAQ Global Select Market) after the
date hereof;
|
|
|
|
changes in generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States, or GAAP, after the date hereof;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in the market price of Hiland Holdings common units
(except that this exception will not prevent or otherwise affect
a determination that any fact, circumstance, event, change,
effect or occurrence underlying such decrease has resulted in,
or contributed to, a material adverse effect);
|
|
|
|
any failure by the Holdings Parties to meet any internal or
publicly disclosed projections, forecasts or estimates of
revenue or earnings (except that this exception will not prevent
or otherwise affect a determination that any fact, circumstance,
event, change, effect or occurrence underlying such failure has
resulted in, or contributed to, a material adverse effect);
|
|
|
|
|
|
a failure, if any, of Hiland Operating, LLC (a subsidiary of
Hiland Holdings) to be in compliance with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Interest Coverage Ratio required by Section 6.17 of the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement; or
|
|
|
|
the Leverage Ratio required by Section 6.18 of the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement,
|
(except that failure to be in compliance with the above ratios
will not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any
fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence
underlying such default has resulted in, or contributed to, a
material adverse effect); or
|
|
|
|
|
any decrease in distributions in respect of the Hiland Holdings
common units (except that this exception will not prevent or
otherwise affect a determination that any fact, circumstance,
event, change, effect or occurrence underlying such decrease has
resulted in, or contributed to, a material adverse
effect); and
|
|
|
|
any decrease in distributions in respect of the common or
subordinated units of Hiland Partners occurring prior to the
execution date of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement (except
that this exception will not prevent or otherwise affect a
determination that any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect
or occurrence underlying such decrease has resulted in, or
contributed to, a material adverse effect).
|
For purposes of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, a
material adverse effect means, with respect to the
HPGP Parent Parties, any fact, circumstance, event, change,
effect or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate with
all other facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or
occurrences, prevents or materially delays or materially impairs
or would be reasonably likely to prevent or materially delay or
materially impair the ability of Parent or HPGP Merger Sub to
consummate the Hiland Holdings merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger agreement.
Agreements
Related to the Conduct of Business
The Hiland Holdings merger agreement provides that, subject to
certain exceptions or as consented to in writing by Parent,
during the period from the signing of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger,
the Holdings Parties, among other things, will:
|
|
|
|
|
conduct their business in the ordinary course consistent with
past practice;
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
use commercially reasonable efforts to (i) maintain and
preserve intact their business organization and material rights
and franchises, (ii) retain the services of their current
officers and employees and consultants and (iii) maintain
and preserve in all material respects the relationships with
customers, suppliers, and others having business dealings with
them; and
|
|
|
|
take no action that would materially adversely affect or
materially delay the ability of any of the parties to the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement from obtaining any necessary approvals
of any regulatory agency or other governmental entity required
for the transactions contemplated by the Hiland Partners merger
agreement, performing its covenants and agreements under the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement or consummating the
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, or otherwise materially delay or prohibit
consummation of the Hiland Partners merger or other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger agreement.
|
Specifically, the Holdings Parties agreed, subject to certain
exceptions or as consented to in writing by Parent (whose
consent may not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed), not to do, or agree to do, any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
make any changes in any of their organizational or governing
documents, other than changes expressly provided for in the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
issue, deliver or sell or authorize, or propose the issuance,
delivery or sale of, any interests or equity securities in
Hiland Holdings or its subsidiaries or securities convertible
into interests or equity securities in Hiland Holdings or its
subsidiaries or subscriptions, rights, warrants or options to
acquire or other agreements or commitments of any character
obligating them to issue any such partnership interests or
equity securities in Hiland Holdings, other than restricted
common units, phantom units or unit options granted to current
or new employees under the Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term
Incentive Plan in a manner consistent with past practice of up
to 50,000 Hiland Holdings common units in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
except for any distributions from Hiland Holdings
subsidiaries to Hiland Holdings, declare, set aside or pay any
distributions in respect of the interests in Hiland Holdings or
other ownership interests, or split, combine or reclassify any
of the interests in Hiland Holdings or other ownership interests
or issue or authorize the issuance of any other interests in
Hiland Holdings or other ownership interests in respect of, in
lieu of or in substitution for any of the interests in Hiland
Holdings or other ownership interests, or purchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of the interests
in Hiland Holdings or other ownership interests other than
repurchase of interests in Hiland Holdings in accordance with
the Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
merge into or with any other entity, other than the Hiland
Partners merger;
|
|
|
|
incur, assume or guarantee any indebtedness for borrowed money,
issue, assume or guarantee any debt securities, grant any
option, warrant or right to purchase any debt securities, or
issue any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any
debt securities other than in connection with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings in the ordinary course of business or provided for in
the Hiland Holdings 2009 annual budget (which we sometimes
refer to in this joint proxy statement as the Hiland
Holdings budget), in each case in accordance with any
existing bank credit facilities;
|
|
|
|
the refinancing or replacement of existing indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
other than as permitted in the two bullet-points above, the
incurrence by Hiland Holdings of up to $1,000,000 in principal
amount of indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
a transaction that is permitted by other provisions of the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
sell, assign, transfer, abandon, lease or otherwise dispose of
or grant any security interest with respect to, pledge or
otherwise encumber (other than permitted encumbrances under the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement) any limited liability company,
partnership or other equity interests of any subsidiary
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
or partially owned entity of the Holdings Parties (excluding
subsidiaries and partially owned entities of Hiland Partners);
|
|
|
|
|
|
settle any claims, demands, lawsuits or state or federal
regulatory proceedings for damages to the extent such
settlements in the aggregate assess damages in excess of
$1,000,000, other than any claims, demands, lawsuits or
proceedings to the extent insured (net of deductibles), to the
extent reserved against in the financial statements of Hiland
Holdings or to the extent covered by an indemnity obligation not
subject to dispute or adjustment from a solvent indemnitor;
|
|
|
|
settle any claims, demands, lawsuits or state or federal
regulatory proceedings seeking an injunction or other equitable
relief where such settlements would have a material adverse
affect on the Hiland Holdings, as defined in the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
make any material change in their tax methods, principles or
elections;
|
|
|
|
make any material change to their financial reporting and
accounting methods other than as required by a change in GAAP;
|
|
|
|
grant any increases in the compensation of any of their
executive officers, except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or as required by the terms of an
existing employee benefit plan or agreement or by applicable law;
|
|
|
|
amend any existing employment or severance or termination
contract with any executive officer;
|
|
|
|
become obligated under any new pension plan, welfare plan,
multiemployer plan, employee benefit plan, severance plan,
change of control or other benefit arrangement or similar plan
or arrangement or amend any existing employee benefit plan, if
such amendment would have the effect of materially enhancing any
benefits thereunder; or
|
|
|
|
voluntarily dissolve or otherwise adopt or vote to adopt a plan
of complete or partial dissolution or liquidation.
|
Provided, however, that any action taken or omitted to be taken
by an officer of a Holdings Party at the direction of any of the
HPGP Parent Parties or Mr. Hamm (other than (1) in his
capacity as part of, (2) in accordance with authority
delegated to him by, or (3) as otherwise authorized by, the
Hiland Holdings Board of Directors or any committee thereof)
that would otherwise constitute a breach of the Conduct of
Business covenants described in this section, will not
constitute a breach of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement.
Other
Covenants and Agreements
Investigation
The Holdings Parties must afford to the HPGP Parent Parties and
their advisors reasonable access during normal business hours
after reasonable prior notice, during the period prior to the
effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger, to the offices,
properties, books and records of the Holdings Parties and
provide to the HPGP Parent Parties such financial and other data
as they may reasonably request related to the Holdings Parties,
including furnishing to Parent the financial results of Hiland
Holdings and its subsidiaries in advance of any filing by Hiland
Holdings with the SEC or other public disclosure containing
financial results. The Holdings Parties also agreed to instruct
their employees and advisors to cooperate with Parent in its
investigations described in this paragraph. The Holdings Parties
are not required to furnish information to Parent to the extent
such information is privileged or the furnishing of such
information is prohibited by law or an existing contract or
agreement.
Parent will hold, and will cause its advisors to hold, any
material or competitively sensitive non-public information
concerning the Holdings Parties or their subsidiaries
confidential. The general partner of Hiland Holdings was
obligated to provide, and has provided, Parent (solely for
informational purposes) the fairness opinion of Barclays Capital
prepared in connection with the Hiland Holdings merger.
158
No
Solicitation
The Holdings Parties may not, and must cause their officers,
directors, employees, agents and representatives (their
representatives) not to, directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage (including by providing
information) or knowingly facilitate any inquiries, proposals or
offers with respect to, or the making or completing, an
alternative proposal (as defined below);
|
|
|
|
engage or participate in any negotiations concerning, or provide
or cause to be provided any non-public information or data
relating to, the Holdings Parties and their subsidiaries, in
connection with, or have any discussions with any person
relating to, an alternative proposal, or otherwise knowingly
encourage or knowingly facilitate any effort or attempt to make
or implement an alternative proposal;
|
|
|
|
approve, endorse or recommend, or propose publicly to approve,
endorse or recommend, any alternative proposal;
|
|
|
|
approve, endorse or recommend, or propose to approve, endorse or
recommend, or execute or enter into, any letter of intent,
agreement in principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement,
option agreement or other similar agreement relating to any
alternative proposal;
|
|
|
|
amend, terminate, waive or fail to enforce, or grant any consent
under, any confidentiality, standstill or similar
agreement; or
|
|
|
|
resolve to propose or agree to do any of the above.
|
In addition, upon the signing of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, the Holdings Parties and their representatives were
obligated to immediately cease any existing solicitations,
discussions or negotiations with any person (other than the HPGP
Parent Parties) that had made or indicated an intention to make
an alternative proposal. The Holdings Parties agreed to
promptly, and in any event not later than ten days following the
date the Hiland Holdings merger agreement was signed, request
that each person who had executed a confidentiality agreement
with a Holdings Party in connection with that persons
consideration of a transaction involving any Holdings Party that
would constitute an alternative proposal return or destroy all
non-public information furnished to that person by or on behalf
of the Holdings Parties.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to approval of the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and Hiland Holdings merger by the
unitholders as required in the Hiland Holdings merger agreement,
the Holdings Parties may, in response to an unsolicited
alternative proposal which did not result from or arise in
connection with a breach of the no solicitation covenant
described in the first paragraph under No
Solicitation above and which the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee determines, in good faith, after consultation with its
outside counsel and financial advisors, constitutes or could
reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal (as
defined below):
|
|
|
|
|
furnish information with respect to the Holdings Parties and
their subsidiaries to the person making such alternative
proposal and its representatives pursuant to an executed
confidentiality agreement no less restrictive (including with
respect to standstill provisions) of the other party than the
form of confidentiality agreement attached as an exhibit to the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
participate in discussions or negotiations with such person and
its representatives regarding such alternative proposal.
|
In this case, Parent is entitled to receive an executed copy of
such confidentiality agreement prior to or substantially
simultaneously with the Holdings Parties furnishing information
to the person making such alternative proposal or its
representatives. Additionally, the Holdings Parties must
simultaneously provide or make available to Parent any
non-public information concerning the Holdings Parties and their
subsidiaries that is provided to the person making such
alternative proposal or its representatives which was not
previously provided or made available to Parent.
The Holdings Parties also agreed to promptly (and in any event
within 24 hours) advise Parent orally and in writing of the
receipt by either of them of any alternative proposal or any
request for non-public information
159
relating to the Holdings Parties and their subsidiaries, other
than requests for information in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice and not reasonably expected to be
related to an alternative proposal, including in each case the
identity of the person making any such alternative proposal or
request and the material terms and conditions of any such
alternative proposal or request (including copies of any
document or correspondence evidencing such alternative proposal
or request).
The Holdings Parties must keep Parent reasonably informed on a
current basis of the status (including any material change to
the terms thereof) of any such alternative proposal or request.
Neither the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors nor any committee
thereof may withdraw, modify or qualify in a manner adverse to
Parent, or resolve to or publicly propose to withdraw, modify or
qualify in a manner adverse to Parent, its recommendation to the
common unitholders to approve the Hiland Holdings merger,
unless, prior to the receipt of the requisite approval of the
holders of Hiland Holdings common units as required under the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
partnership agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors or the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee determines in good faith, after consultation
with its respective outside counsel and financial advisors, that
a change in its recommendation would be in the best interests of
the holders of Hiland Holdings common units (other than the Hamm
Continuing Investors); and
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors or the Hiland Holdings
Conflicts Committee, as applicable, provides Parent with at
least three business days advance written notice of its
intention to change its recommendation and specifying the
material events giving rise thereto, then the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors or the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee,
as applicable, may change its recommendation.
|
The restrictions summarized above are inapplicable to any
discussions or negotiations with the lenders under the Credit
Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2006, between Hiland Holdings
GP, LLC and MidFirst Bank (which, together with any related
guarantees, in each case as amended, restated, supplemented or
otherwise modified from time, we refer to in this joint proxy
statement as the HPGP Credit Agreement) or the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement regarding debt financing
transactions with such lenders that may involve equity issuances
that would constitute an alternative proposal. In addition,
nothing contained in the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
prohibits the Holdings Parties or the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors or any committee thereof from disclosing to the Hiland
Holdings unitholders a position in response to any tender offer
as required by the SEC.
As used in the Hiland Holdings merger agreement,
alternative proposal means any inquiry, proposal or
offer from any person or group of persons other than the HPGP
Parent Parties, relating to, or that could reasonably be
expected to lead to, in one transaction or a series of related
transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
a merger, tender or exchange offer, consolidation,
reorganization, reclassification, recapitalization, liquidation
or dissolution, or other business combination involving any
Holdings Party or any of their subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
the issuance by Hiland Holdings or Hiland Partners of any
general partner interest or any class of partnership interests
constituting more than 15% of such class of partnership
interests; or
|
|
|
|
the acquisition in any manner, directly or indirectly, of any
general partner interest, any class of partnership interests
constituting more than 15% of such class of partnership
interests or more than 15% of the consolidated total assets of
the Holdings Parties and their subsidiaries (including equity
interests in any subsidiary or partially owned entity of Hiland
Holdings), in each case other than the Hiland Partners merger
and the Hiland Holdings merger.
|
160
As used in the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, superior
proposal shall mean any written alternative proposal:
|
|
|
|
|
on terms which the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and financial advisors, to be more favorable from
a financial point of view to the holders of Hiland Holdings
common units (other than the Hamm Continuing Investors); and
|
|
|
|
that is reasonably capable of being completed, taking into
account all financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects of
such proposal; provided that for purposes of the definition
Superior Proposal, the references to 15%
in the definition of Alternative Proposal shall be
deemed to be references to 35% with respect to the
Holdings Parties and 55% with respect to the Hiland
Parties and the subsidiaries and partially owned entities of
Hiland.
|
In determining if a proposal is more favorable, from a financial
point of view to the holders of Hiland Holdings common units
than the Hiland Holdings merger, the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee may not consider any interests that any holder may
have other than as a unitholder of Hiland Holdings entitled to
the Hiland Holdings merger consideration and will take into
account all the terms and conditions of such proposal, and the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement (including any proposal or
offer by the HPGP Parent Parties to amend the terms of the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger).
Filings
and Other Actions
Upon signing of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, the
Holdings Parties were obligated to prepare and file this joint
proxy statement as soon as reasonably practicable. The Holdings
Parties and Parent were obligated to prepare and file the
Schedule 13E-3
as soon as reasonably practicable and both parties are obligated
to use their commercially reasonable efforts to have this joint
proxy statement and the
Schedule 13E-3,
cleared by the SEC as promptly as practicable after such filing.
Additionally, the Holdings Parties agreed to:
|
|
|
|
|
take all action necessary in accordance with applicable laws and
the Hiland Holdings partnership agreement to duly call, give
notice of, convene and hold a meeting of the Hiland Holdings
unitholders as promptly as reasonably practicable following the
mailing of this joint proxy statement for the purpose of
obtaining the necessary unitholder approvals under the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings partnership
agreement of the Hiland Holdings merger and the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
unless there is a change in the recommendation of the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors or Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee, use all commercially reasonable efforts to solicit
from Hiland Holdings unitholders proxies in favor of the
adoption and approval of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
and the Hiland Holdings merger.
|
Unless the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is terminated
pursuant to its terms, the Holdings Parties must take all of the
actions described in the first bullet point in the previous
paragraph regardless of whether or not there has been a change
in the recommendation of the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
or the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee.
Equity
Awards
The Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan and each
award of restricted common units (except awards held by
nonemployee members of the Board of Directors of Directors as
described in Effect of the Merger on the
Common Units and Certain Other Securities of Hiland Holdings and
Merger Sub above), phantom units and options outstanding
under the Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan
immediately prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings
merger will remain outstanding in accordance with its terms as a
plan or equity compensation award, as applicable, of the
surviving entity and shall be unaffected by the transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger agreement. Hiland
161
Holdings has agreed to take any action necessary pursuant to the
Hiland Holdings GP, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan to achieve this
result.
Efforts
to Complete the Hiland Holdings Merger
The HPGP Parent Parties and the Holdings Parties shall use their
commercially reasonable efforts (subject to, and in accordance
with, applicable law) to take promptly, or to cause to be taken,
all actions, and to do promptly, or to cause to be done, and to
assist and to cooperate with the other parties in doing, all
things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make
effective the Hiland Holdings merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger agreement including:
|
|
|
|
|
the obtaining of all necessary actions or nonactions, waivers,
consents and approvals from governmental entities and the making
of all necessary registrations and filings and the taking of all
steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval or waiver from,
or to avoid an action or proceeding by, any governmental entity,
|
|
|
|
the obtaining of all necessary consents, approvals or waivers
from third parties,
|
|
|
|
the defending of any lawsuits or other legal proceedings,
whether judicial or administrative, challenging the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement or the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby and
|
|
|
|
the execution and delivery of any additional instruments
reasonably necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby.
|
In addition, Parent is obligated to use its reasonable best
efforts to obtain the funding for the Hiland Holdings merger in
accordance with the funding commitment letters provided by
Mr. Hamm to Parent and described in Special
Factors Financing of the Mergers, beginning on
page 124.
The Holdings Parties and the HPGP Parent Parties have agreed to:
|
|
|
|
|
make their respective filings and thereafter make any other
required submissions under the HSR Act;
|
|
|
|
use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other
in determining whether any filings are required to be made with,
or consents, permits, authorizations, waivers or approvals are
required to be obtained from, any third parties or other
governmental entities in connection with the execution and
delivery of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby;
|
|
|
|
use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other
in timely making all such filings and timely seeking all such
consents, permits, authorizations or approvals;
|
|
|
|
use commercially reasonable efforts to take, or to cause to be
taken, all other actions and to do, or to cause to be done, all
other things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and
make effective the Hiland Holdings merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, including taking all such further action as
reasonably may be necessary to resolve such objections, if any,
any federal, state or foreign antitrust enforcement authorities
or competition authorities or other governmental entities may
assert in connection with the HSR Act, or other state or federal
regulatory authorities of any other nation or other jurisdiction
or any other person may assert under regulatory law with respect
to the Hiland Holdings merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, and to
avoid or eliminate each and every impediment under any law that
may be asserted by any governmental entity with respect to the
Hiland Holdings merger so as to enable the closing to occur as
soon as reasonably possible; and
|
|
|
|
subject to applicable legal limitations and the instructions of
any governmental entity, use commercially reasonable efforts to
keep each other apprised of the status of matters relating to
the completion of the transactions contemplated by the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement, including to the extent permitted by
law promptly furnishing the other with copies of notices or
other communications received by the
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings Parties or any of their subsidiaries or the HPGP Parent
Parties, as the case may be, from any third party
and/or any
governmental entity with respect thereto.
|
The Holdings Parties and the HPGP Parent Parties agreed that, if
any administrative or judicial action or proceeding, including
any proceeding by a private party, is instituted (or threatened
to be instituted) challenging the Hiland Holdings merger or any
other transaction contemplated by this Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, each of the Holdings Parties or the HPGP Parent
Parties shall cooperate in all respects with each other and
shall use their respective commercially reasonable efforts to
contest and resist any such action or proceeding and to have
vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any decree, judgment,
injunction or other order, whether temporary, preliminary or
permanent, that is in effect and that prohibits, prevents or
restricts consummation of the Hiland Holdings merger or any
other transactions contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement.
The HPGP Parent Parties and the Holdings Parties have agreed
that any of the parties to the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
may, as each deems advisable and necessary, reasonably designate
any competitively sensitive material provided to the other under
the covenant described in this section as material that may be
given only to the outside regulatory counsel of the recipient
and not disclosed by such outside counsel to employees, officers
or directors of the recipient unless express written permission
is obtained in advance from the source of the materials (the
HPGP Parent Parties or the Holdings Parties as the case may be)
or its legal counsel. Materials provided to the other party or
its outside counsel may be redacted to remove references
concerning the valuation of the Hiland Holdings common units or
the business of the Holdings Parties and their subsidiaries.
Takeover
Statute
If any fair price, moratorium,
control share acquisition or other form of
anti-takeover statute or regulation shall become applicable to
the Hiland Holdings merger or the other transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger agreement or the
Hiland Holdings support agreement, each of the Holdings Parties
or the HPGP Parent Parties have agreed to grant such approvals
and take such actions as are reasonably necessary so that the
Hiland Holdings merger, the Hiland Holdings support agreement,
and the other transactions contemplated by the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and thereby may be consummated as promptly as
practicable on the terms contemplated in the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and otherwise act to eliminate or minimize the
effects of such statute or regulation on the Hiland Holdings
merger, the Hiland Holdings support agreement, and the other
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.
Public
Announcements
The Holdings Parties and the HPGP Parent Parties have agreed to
consult with and provide each other the opportunity to review
and comment (which shall be considered reasonably and in good
faith by the other parties) upon any press release or other
public statement or comment prior to the issuance of such press
release or other public statement or comment relating to the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement or the transactions
contemplated therein and shall not issue any such press release
or other public statement or comment prior to such consultation
and opportunity to review and comment except as may be required
by applicable law or by obligations pursuant to any listing
agreement with any national securities exchange. Any public
statement or disclosure that is consistent with a public
statement or disclosure previously approved by the other party
shall not, however, require the prior approval of such other
party.
Indemnification
and Insurance
The partnership agreement of the surviving entity shall not,
with respect to indemnification of directors and officers, be
amended, repealed or otherwise modified after the effective time
of the Hiland Holdings merger in any manner that would adversely
affect the rights thereunder of the persons who at any time
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger were
identified as prospective indemnitees under the Hiland Holdings
partnership agreement in respect of actions or omissions
occurring at or prior to the effective time of
163
the Hiland Holdings merger (including the transactions
contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger agreement).
For a period of six years after the effective time of the Hiland
Holdings merger, Parent and the general partner of Hiland
Holdings shall, and Parent and the general partner of Hiland
Holdings shall cause the surviving entity (and its successors or
assigns) to, maintain officers and directors
liability insurance covering each person who is immediately
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger, or
has been at any time prior to the effective time of the Hiland
Holdings merger, an officer or director of any of the Holdings
Parties or their subsidiaries and each person who immediately
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger is
serving or prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings
merger has served at the request of any of the Holdings Parties
or their subsidiaries as a director, officer, trustee or
fiduciary of another corporation, partnership, joint venture,
trust, pension or other employee benefit plan of the Holdings
Parties or their subsidiaries who are or at any time prior to
the effective time were covered by the existing officers
and directors liability insurance applicable to the
Holdings Parties or their subsidiaries on terms substantially no
less advantageous to the indemnified persons described in this
paragraph than such existing insurance with respect to acts or
omissions, or alleged acts or omissions, prior to the effective
time of the Hiland Holdings merger (whether claims, actions or
other proceedings relating thereto are commenced, asserted or
claimed before or after the effective time of the Hiland
Holdings merger).
Hiland Holdings shall cause (and Parent, following the closing
of the Hiland Partners merger, shall continue to cause) coverage
to be extended under the existing officers and
directors liability insurance applicable to the Holdings
Parties or their subsidiaries by obtaining a six-year
tail policy on terms and conditions no less
advantageous than the existing officers and
directors liability insurance, and such tail
policy shall satisfy the requirements summarized in this
section. In no event, however, will Parent be required to spend
more than 250% of the last annual premium paid by the Holdings
Parties and their subsidiaries prior to the signing date of the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement per policy year of coverage
under such tail policy. If the cost per policy year
of such insurance exceeds 250% of the last annual premium,
Parent shall purchase as much coverage per policy year as
reasonably obtainable for the amount equal to 250% of the last
annual premium.
In the event Parent, the general partner of Hiland Holdings or
any of their respective successors or assigns:
|
|
|
|
|
consolidates with or merges into any other person and shall not
be the continuing or surviving entity in such consolidation or
merger; or
|
|
|
|
transfers all or substantially all of its properties and assets
to any person
|
then and in either such case, Parent or the general partner of
Hiland Holdings, as the case may be, shall cause proper
provision to be made so that its successors or assigns shall
assume the obligations summarized in this
Indemnification and Insurance section.
Unitholder
Litigation
The Holdings Parties have agreed to give Parent the opportunity
to participate in the defense or settlement of any unitholder
litigation against any of the Holdings Parties or their
subsidiaries
and/or their
respective directors relating to the Hiland Holdings merger or
any other transactions contemplated in the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and not to agree to any settlement shall
without Parents consent (which shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed).
Notification
of Certain Matters
The Holdings Parties and the HPGP Parent Parties have agreed to
give prompt notice to each other of:
|
|
|
|
|
any notice or other communication received by such party from
any governmental entity in connection with the Hiland Holdings
merger or the other transactions contemplated in the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement or from any person alleging that the
consent of such person is or may be required in
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
connection with the Hiland Holdings merger or the other
transactions contemplated in the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, if the subject matter of such communication or the
failure of such party to obtain such consent could be material
to Hiland Holdings, the surviving entity or Parent,
|
|
|
|
|
|
any actions, suits, claims, investigations or proceedings
commenced or, to such partys knowledge, threatened
against, relating to or involving or otherwise affecting such
party or any of its subsidiaries which relate to the Hiland
Holdings merger or the other transactions contemplated in the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
the discovery of any fact or circumstance that, or the
occurrence or non-occurrence of any event the occurrence or
non-occurrence of which, would, individually or in the
aggregate, cause or result in a material adverse effect to the
Holdings Parties or the HPGP Parent Parties.
|
The Holdings Parties shall reasonably cooperate with the HPGP
Parent Parties in efforts to mitigate any adverse consequences
to the HPGP Parent Parties which may arise from any criminal or
regulatory investigation or action involving any of the Hiland
Parties or their subsidiaries or partially-owned entities
(including by coordinating and providing assistance in meeting
with regulators).
Rule 16b-3
Prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger,
Hiland Holdings has agreed to take such steps as may be
reasonably requested by any party to the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement to cause dispositions of Hiland Holdings equity
securities (including derivative securities) pursuant to the
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement by each individual who is a director or officer of the
general partner of Hiland Holdings to be exempt from short-swing
profits liability under the Exchange Act.
Conditions
to Completion of the Hiland Holdings Merger
The obligations of the Holdings Parties and the HPGP Parent
Parties to effect the Hiland Holdings merger shall be subject to
the fulfillment or waiver by all parties, at or prior to the
effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger, of each of the
following, mutual conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the approval of the holders of (i) a majority of the
outstanding common units of Hiland Holdings (excluding common
units owned by Mr. Hamm, his affiliates (including
Continental Gas), the Hamm family trusts and the directors and
officers of Hiland Holdings) entitled to vote thereon voting as
a class and (ii) a majority of the outstanding common units
of Hiland Holdings entitled to vote thereon voting as a class to
approve the Hiland Holdings merger agreement must be obtained;
|
|
|
|
no restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or
other order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or
other legal restraint or prohibition enacted or promulgated by
any governmental entity restraining, enjoining or otherwise
prohibiting the consummation of the Hiland Holdings merger shall
be in effect; and
|
|
|
|
any waiting period under the HSR Act applicable to the
consummation of the Hiland Holdings merger shall have expired or
been earlier terminated.
|
The obligations of the Holdings Parties to effect the Hiland
Holdings merger are further subject to the fulfillment at or
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger of
each of the following conditions, any one or more of which may
be waived in whole or in part by the Holdings Parties:
|
|
|
|
|
(1) the representations and warranties of the HPGP Parent
Parties as to qualification, organization, authority, no
violation, and consents and approvals shall be true and correct
in all respects, in each case at and as of the date of the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement and at and as of the closing
date as though made at and as of the closing date of the Hiland
Holdings merger and (2) the representations and warranties
of the HPGP Parent Parties set forth in the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement (other than those referenced in clause (1)
of this paragraph) shall be true and correct in all respects
(disregarding any materiality or Parent material adverse effect
qualifiers therein) at and as of the date of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and at and as of the closing date as though
made at and as of
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
the closing date, except where any failures of such
representations or warranties to be so true and correct would
not have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on Parent; provided, however, that, with respect to
clauses (1) and (2) of this paragraph, representations
and warranties that are made as of a particular date or period
shall be true and correct (in the manner set forth in
clause (1) or (2), as applicable) only as of such date or
period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the HPGP Parent Parties shall have performed all obligations and
complied with all covenants required by the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement to be performed or complied with by them that
are qualified by materiality or a material adverse effect
qualifier and shall have in all material respects performed all
other obligations and complied with all other covenants required
by the Hiland Holdings merger agreement to be performed or
complied with by them; and
|
|
|
|
Parent shall have delivered to the Holdings Parties a
certificate, dated the effective time of the Hiland Holdings
merger and signed by its Chief Executive Officer or another
senior executive officer, certifying to the effect that the
conditions set forth in the first two bullet points above have
been satisfied.
|
The obligations of the HPGP Parent Parties to effect the Hiland
Holdings merger are further subject to the fulfillment at or
prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings merger of
each of the following conditions, any one or more of which may
be waived in whole or in part by the HPGP Parent Parties:
|
|
|
|
|
(1) the representations and warranties of the Holdings
Parties as to qualification, organization, subsidiaries,
capitalization, authority, no violation, consents and approvals,
absence of certain changes or events and required approvals
shall be true and correct in all respects, except, in the case
of the representation as to capitalization, for such
inaccuracies as are de minimis in the aggregate, in each
case at and as of the date of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and at and as of the closing as though made at and as
of the closing and (2) the representations and warranties
of the Holdings Parties set forth in the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement (other than those referenced in clause (1) of
this paragraph) shall be true and correct in all respects
(disregarding any materiality or Holdings material adverse
effect qualifiers therein) as of the date of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and at and as of the closing as though made at
and as of the closing, except where any failures of such
representations or warranties to be so true and correct would
not have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on the Holdings Parties; provided, however, that, with
respect to clauses (1) and (2) of this paragraph,
representations and warranties that are made as of a particular
date or period shall be true and correct (in the manner set
forth in clause (1) or (2), as applicable) only as of such
date or period; provided, further, that the representations and
warranties referenced in clauses (1) and (2) shall not
be deemed to be inaccurate to the extent that Parent had
knowledge on the date of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement of
such inaccuracy;
|
|
|
|
the Holdings Parties shall have performed all obligations and
complied with all covenants required by the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement to be performed or complied with by them that
are qualified by materiality or a Holdings material adverse
effect qualifier and shall have in all material respects
performed all other obligations and complied with all other
covenants required by the Hiland Holdings merger agreement to be
performed or complied with by them;
|
|
|
|
since the date of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement there
shall not have been any material adverse effect on the Holdings
Parties;
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings merger shall be effectuated concurrently
with the Hiland Holdings merger; provided that the HPGP Parent
Parties may not waive this condition unless the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger shall have been
submitted to a vote of unitholders and the outcome of such vote
shall not have constituted the unitholder approval required
under the Hiland Holdings partnership agreement and the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement, described in The Hiland
Holdings Merger Agreement Conditions to Completion
of the Hiland Holdings Merger, beginning on
page 165; and
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
the Holdings Parties shall have delivered to the HPGP Parent
Parties a certificate, dated the effective time of the Hiland
Holdings merger and signed by an executive officer of Hiland
Holdings, certifying to the effect that the conditions set forth
in the first three bullet points of this paragraph have been
satisfied.
|
No party to the Hiland Holdings merger agreement may rely on the
failure of any condition summarized in this section to be
satisfied if such failure was caused by such partys breach
in any material respect of any provision of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement or failure to use commercially reasonable
efforts to consummate the Hiland Holdings merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement.
Termination
The Hiland Holdings merger agreement may be terminated and
abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the Hiland
Holdings merger, whether before or after any approval of the
matters presented in connection with the Hiland Holdings merger
by the unitholders of Hiland Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
by the mutual written consent of the Holdings Parties and the
HPGP Parent Parties;
|
|
|
|
by either the Holdings Parties or the HPGP Parent Parties, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings merger shall not have become effective on or
before November 1, 2009 and the party seeking to terminate
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement shall not have breached its
obligations under the Hiland Holdings merger agreement in any
manner that shall have proximately caused the failure to
consummate the Hiland Holdings merger on or before
November 1, 2009;
|
|
|
|
an injunction, other legal restraint or order of any
governmental entity shall have been entered permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation
of the Hiland Holdings merger and such injunction, other legal
restraint or order shall have become final and nonappealable;
provided that the party seeking to terminate this Agreement
shall have complied in all material respects with its
obligations summarized under Efforts to
Complete the Hiland Holdings Merger above; or
|
|
|
|
the special meeting of the unitholders of Hiland Holdings shall
have concluded and, upon a vote taken at such meeting, the
requisite unitholder approval of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement or the Hiland Holdings merger shall not have been
obtained; provided that the right to terminate the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement shall not be available to the Holdings
Parties if any Holdings Party materially breached any
obligations summarized under No
Solicitation and Filings and Other
Actions above or to the HPGP Parent Parties if any Hamm
Continuing Investor materially breached any of their obligations
under the Hiland Holdings support agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the Holdings Parties, if any HPGP Parent Party shall have
breached or failed to perform any of its representations,
warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement, which breach or failure to
perform:
|
|
|
|
|
|
would constitute the failure of a condition to the Holdings
Parties obligations to complete the Hiland Holdings
merger; and
|
|
|
|
is not capable of being satisfied or cured by November 1,
2009 or, if capable of being satisfied or cured, is not
satisfied or cured by thirty days following receipt by Parent of
written notice stating the Holdings Parties intention to
terminate the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the basis for
such termination;
|
provided that the right to terminate the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement pursuant to the provision summarized in this paragraph
shall not be available to the Holdings Parties if, at such time,
a condition to the HPGP Parent Parties obligation to
complete the merger is not capable of being satisfied; or
167
|
|
|
|
|
by the HPGP Parent Parties, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
any Holdings Party shall have breached or failed to perform any
of its representations, warranties, covenants or other
agreements contained in the Hiland Holdings merger agreement,
which breach or failure to perform: (A) would constitute
the failure of a condition to the HPGP Parent Parties
obligations to complete the merger and (B) is not capable
of being satisfied or cured by November 1, 2009 or, if
capable of being satisfied or cured, is not satisfied or cured
by thirty days following receipt by the Holdings Parties of
written notice stating the HPGP Parent Parties intention
to terminate the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the basis
for such termination; provided that the right to terminate the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement pursuant to the provision
summarized in this paragraph shall not be available to the HPGP
Parent Parties if, at such time, a condition to the Holdings
Parties obligation to complete the merger is not capable
of being satisfied;
|
|
|
|
a change in the recommendation of the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors or Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee or a failure of
the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors to recommend the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement and Hiland Holdings merger to its
unitholders occurs or the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors or
any committee thereof approves, endorses or recommends, or
resolves to or publicly proposes to approve, endorse or
recommend, any alternative proposal; or
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings merger is not capable of closing by
November 1, 2009.
|
Effect of
Termination; Remedies
In the event of termination of the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement as summarized above under
Termination, the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement shall terminate, except for certain provisions
including the provision relating to reimbursement of expenses
summarized in Reimbursement of Certain
Expenses below, and there shall be no liability on the
part of the Holdings Parties or the HPGP Parent Parties to the
other except as provided in the provision relating to
reimbursement of expenses summarized in
Reimbursement of Certain Expenses below.
No such termination, however, shall relieve any party from
liability arising out of any willful breach of any of the
representations, warranties or covenants in the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement (subject to any express limitations set forth
in the Hiland Holdings merger agreement), in which case the
aggrieved party shall be entitled to all rights and remedies
available at law or in equity.
Reimbursement
of Certain Expenses
In the event that the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is
terminated by the HPGP Parent Parties due to a change in the
recommendation of the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors or the
Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee or:
|
|
|
|
|
an alternative proposal shall have been made known to the
Holdings Parties or shall have been made directly to the Hiland
Holdings unitholders generally or any person shall have publicly
announced an intention (whether or not conditional or withdrawn)
to make an alternative proposal and thereafter;
|
|
|
|
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is terminated by the
Holdings Parties or the HPGP Parent Parties (as applicable)
because November 1, 2009 has passed, the unitholders of
Hiland Holdings failed to approve the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement or the Hiland Holdings merger or any Holdings Party
breached or failed to perform any of its representations,
warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement, which breach or failure to
perform: (A) would constitute the failure of a condition to
the HPGP Parent Parties obligations to complete the merger
and (B) is not capable of being satisfied or cured by
November 1, 2009 or, if capable of being satisfied or
cured, is not satisfied or cured by thirty days following
receipt by the Holdings Parties of written notice stating the
HPGP Parent Parties intention to terminate the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
a Holdings Party enters into a definitive agreement with respect
to, or consummates, a transaction contemplated by any
alternative proposal within twelve months of the date the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement is terminated,
|
168
then Hiland Holdings shall pay to Parent all of the expenses of
the HPGP Parent Parties, up to $800,000; provided that, no
expense for which a Parent Party has received reimbursement
pursuant to the Hiland Holdings merger agreement shall be paid.
See The Hiland Holdings Merger Agreement
Reimbursement of Certain Expenses, beginning on
page 168.
Any payment required to be made pursuant to the provision
summarized in the prior paragraph shall be made to Parent not
later than two business days after delivery to Hiland Holdings
of an itemization setting forth in reasonable detail all
expenses of the HPGP Parent Parties for which reimbursement is
sought (which itemization may be supplemented and updated from
time to time by Parent until the sixtieth day after delivery of
such notice of demand for payment). All such payments shall be
made by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an
account to be designated by Parent.
Specific
Performance
The parties to the Hiland Holdings merger agreement have agreed
that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any
provisions of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement were not
performed in accordance with their specific terms or were
otherwise breached. Accordingly, prior to termination of the
Hiland Holdings merger agreement in accordance with its terms,
the parties will be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to
prevent breaches of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and to
enforce specifically the terms and provisions of the Hiland
Holdings merger agreement in addition to any other remedy to
which the parties are entitled at law or in equity. In
connection with any request for specific performance or
equitable relief by any party, each of the other parties agreed
to waive any requirement for the security or posting of any bond
in connection with the remedy of specific performance or
equitable relief. Any actions for specific performance or
equitable relief must be brought in the Delaware Chancery Court
or the federal courts within the State of Delaware.
Amendments
and Waivers
At any time prior to the effective time of the Hiland Holdings
merger, any provision of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
may be amended or waived if, and only if, such amendment or
waiver is in writing and signed, in the case of an amendment, by
the Holdings Parties and the HPGP Parent Parties, or in the case
of a waiver, by the party against whom the waiver is to be
effective; provided, however, that after receipt of the
unitholder approval required under the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger, if any such amendment
or waiver shall by applicable law or in accordance with the
rules and regulations of the NASDAQ Global Select Market require
further approval of the unitholders of Hiland Holdings, the
effectiveness of such amendment or waiver shall be subject to
the approval of the unitholders of Hiland Holdings.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no failure or delay by the
Holdings Parties or the HPGP Parent Parties in exercising any
right under the Hiland Holdings merger agreement shall operate
as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise
thereof preclude any other or further exercise of any other
right under the Hiland Holdings merger agreement.
Recommendation
The Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee has unanimously
determined that the Hiland Holdings merger agreement is
advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland
Holdings and the Hiland Holdings public unitholders and
(i) has unanimously recommended to the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors that the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
approve the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland
Holdings merger and (ii) unanimously recommends that the
Hiland Holdings public unitholders approve the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger. The Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors, after considering factors including
the unanimous recommendation of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts
Committee, determined that the Hiland Holdings merger agreement
is advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Hiland
Holdings and the Hiland Holdings public unitholders, approved
the Hiland Holdings merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings
merger and recommends that the Hiland Holdings public
unitholders vote in favor of the approval of the Hiland Holdings
merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger. See
Special Factors Recommendation of the Hiland
Holdings Conflicts Committee and the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors; Reasons For Recommending Approval of the Merger.
169
INFORMATION
CONCERNING THE HILAND COMPANIES
About
Hiland Partners
Hiland Partners, a Delaware limited partnership formed in
October 2004, is a midstream energy limited partnership engaged
in purchasing, gathering, compressing, dehydrating, treating,
processing and marketing of natural gas and the fractionating,
or separating, and marketing of NGLs. Hiland Partners
operations are primarily located in the Mid-Continent and Rocky
Mountain regions of the United States.
Through its midstream segment, Hiland Partners connects the
wells of natural gas and crude oil producers in its operating
areas to its gathering systems, treats natural gas to remove
impurities, processes natural gas for the removal of NGLs,
fractionates NGLs into NGL products and provides an aggregate
supply of natural gas and NGL products to a variety of
transmission pipelines and markets. Through its compression
segment, Hiland Partners provides compressed air and water to
Continental Resources. Continental Resources uses the compressed
air and water in its oil and gas secondary recovery operations
in North Dakota by injecting them into its oil and gas
reservoirs to increase oil and gas production from those
reservoirs. This increased production of natural gas flows
through Hiland Partners Badlands gathering system.
Hiland Partners midstream assets consist of 15 natural gas
gathering systems with approximately 2,138 miles of gas
gathering pipelines, six natural gas processing plants, seven
natural gas treating facilities and three NGL fractionation
facilities. Hiland Partners compression assets consist of
two air compression facilities and a water injection plant.
Hiland Partners common units trade on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market under the symbol HLND. Hiland
Partners and its general partners mailing address is
205 West Maple, Suite 1100, Enid, Oklahoma 73701 and
their telephone number is
(580) 242-6040.
A detailed description of Hiland Partners business is
contained in Hiland Partners Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, each of which is
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
About
Hiland Holdings
Hiland Holdings, a Delaware limited partnership was formed in
May 2006 to own Hiland Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of
Hiland Partners and certain other common units and subordinated
units in Hiland Partners. Hiland Holdings cash generating
assets consist solely of its ownership interests in Hiland
Partners, in particular (i) the 2% general partner interest
in Hiland Partners, (ii) all of the incentive distribution
rights in Hiland Partners, and (iii) 2,321,471 common units
and 3,060,000 subordinated units of Hiland Partners,
representing an aggregate 57.4% limited partner interest in
Hiland Partners.
Hiland Holdings common units trade on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market under the symbol HPGP. Hiland
Holdings and its general partners mailing address is
205 West Maple, Suite 1100, Enid, Oklahoma 73701 and
their telephone number is
(580) 242-6040.
A detailed description of Hiland Holdings business is
contained in Hiland Holdings Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, each of which is
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
Certain
Transactions between the Hiland Companies and Affiliates of
Harold Hamm
As more fully described in each Hiland Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which are
incorporated herein by reference, the Hiland Companies regularly
transact business with Continental Resources pursuant to the
contracts summarized below. As of April 10, 2009,
Mr. Hamm owned 72.8% of the equity interests in Continental
Resources.
The disclosures below are based solely on the information
contained in each Hiland Companys Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
170
Compression
Services Agreement
In connection with Hiland Partners initial public
offering, Hiland Partners entered into a four-year compression
services agreement with Continental Resources. The initial term
expired on January 28, 2009, but the contract has
automatically renewed each month since the expiration for an
additional one-month term. For each of the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, Hiland Partners received
revenues of $4.8 million from Continental Resources under
this arrangement.
Gas
Purchase Contracts
Hiland Partners purchases natural gas and NGLs from Continental
Resources and its affiliates. Hiland Partners purchased natural
gas and NGLs from Continental Resources and its affiliates in
the amount of approximately $116.7 million and
$60.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
Badlands
Purchase Contract
On November 8, 2005, Hiland Partners entered into a new
15-year
definitive gas purchase agreement with Continental Resources
under which Hiland Partners gathers, treats and processes
additional natural gas, which is produced as a by-product of
Continental Resources secondary oil recovery operations,
in the areas specified by the contract. In return, Hiland
Partners receives 50% of the proceeds attributable to residue
gas and NGLs sales as well as certain fixed fees associated with
gathering and treating the natural gas, including a $0.60 per
Mcf fee for the first 36 Bcf of natural gas gathered.
Other
Agreements
Each of the Hiland Companies leases office space under operating
leases from an entity wholly owned by Harold Hamm. Rents paid
under these leases totaled approximately $157,000 and $143,000
for each of the Hiland Companies for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These rates are
consistent with the rates charged to other non-affiliated
tenants in the building in which the Hiland Companies have their
offices.
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE HILAND COMPANIES
As is the case with many publicly traded partnerships, the
Hiland Companies do not have officers, directors or employees.
The operations and activities of the Hiland Companies are
managed by their respective general partners. References to
Hiland Partners directors and officers are references to
the directors and officers of Hiland Partners GP, LLC, and
references to Hiland Holdings directors and officers are
references to the directors and officers of Hiland Partners GP
Holdings, LLC. Neither Hiland Partners unitholders nor Hiland
Holdings unitholders participate, directly or indirectly, in the
management or operation of the Hiland Companies. The general
partner of each of the Hiland Companies owes a fiduciary duty to
the unitholders of that Hiland Company, as limited by such
Hiland Companys partnership agreement.
Hiland
Partners
Directors are elected for one-year terms. The following table
shows information regarding the current directors and executive
officers of Hiland Partners GP, LLC, as of the date of this
joint proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position with Hiland Partners GP, LLC
|
|
Harold Hamm
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Joseph L. Griffin
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|
Matthew S. Harrison
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President-Finance, Secretary and
Director
|
Kent C. Christopherson
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Chief Operations Officer, Vice President
|
Michael L. Greenwood
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Director
|
Edward D. Doherty
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
Director
|
Rayford T. Reid
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
Shelby E. Odell
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Director
|
John T. McNabb, II
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Director
|
171
Harold Hamm was elected Chairman of the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors in October 2004 and serves as Chairman of the
Compensation Committee of the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors. Mr. Hamm has served as Chairman of the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors since September 2006 and also serves
as Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors. In December 1994, Mr. Hamm began
serving as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a
director of Continental Gas, Inc., and he subsequently served as
chief executive officer and director of Continental Gas, Inc.
until 2004. Since its inception in 1967 until October 2005,
Mr. Hamm served as President and Chief Executive Officer
and a director of Continental Resources, Inc. and currently
serves as its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of its board
of directors. Mr. Hamm is also immediate past President of
the National Stripper Well Association, a member of the
executive board of the Oklahoma Independent Petroleum
Association and a member of the executive board of the Oklahoma
Energy Explorers. In addition, Mr. Hamm is a director of
Complete Production Services, Inc., a publicly traded oilfield
service company.
Joseph L. Griffin was appointed Chief Executive Officer,
President and was elected as a director of the general partner
of Hiland Partners in June 2007. Mr. Griffin has also
served as Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of
the general partner of Hiland Holdings since June 2007.
Mr. Griffin has more than 20 years of experience in
the midstream natural gas industry. From June 2004 to June 2007,
Mr. Griffin served as executive vice president over
multiple facets of the business of Lumen Midstream Partnership,
a subsidiary of the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, in Tulsa, OK. In
1989, Mr. Griffin co-founded Lumen Midstream, held various
senior level management positions and served as a director until
Lumen was sold in 2004 to the Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
Mr. Griffin holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business
Administration from Oklahoma State University and is also a
certified public accountant.
Matthew S. Harrison was appointed Chief Financial
Officer, Vice President-Finance, Secretary and was elected as a
director of the general partner of Hiland Partners in April
2008. Mr. Harrison has served as Chief Financial Officer,
Vice President-Finance, Secretary and a director of the general
partner of Hiland Holdings since April 2008. Mr. Harrison
joined the Hiland Companies as Vice President of Business
Development in February 2008 from Wachovia Securities where he
most recently was a director for its Energy & Power
Mergers & Acquisitions Group. Prior to joining
Wachovia Securities in 2007, Mr. Harrison spent eight years
as an investment banker with A.G. Edwards Capital Markets
Mergers & Acquisitions Group. Prior to joining A.G.
Edwards, Mr. Harrison spent five years with Price
Waterhouse, LLP, the predecessor of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP,
as a senior accountant. He holds a B.S. degree in Accounting
from the University of Tennessee, a Masters of Business
Administration degree from the Kellogg Graduate School of
Management at Northwestern University and is a certified public
accountant.
Kent C. Christopherson was appointed Vice President-Chief
Operations Officer of the general partner of Hiland Partners in
August 2008. Mr. Christopherson has also served as Vice
President-Chief Operations Officer of the general partner of
Hiland Holdings since August 2008. Mr. Christopherson
joined the Hiland Companies from DCP Midstream Partners, L.P.
where he served as Senior Director of Operating Excellence and
Reliability Services from 2002 until 2008. Prior to joining DCP,
Mr. Christopherson was employed by Western Gas Resources
and Flopetrol-Johnson Schlumberger. Mr. Christopherson
earned a B.S. degree in Mining Engineering & Geology
from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, a Masters
of Business Administration degree from Nova Southeastern
University and is a certified maintenance &
reliability professional by the Society of
Maintenance & Reliability Professionals and a
certified lubrication specialist by the Society of
Tribologists & Lubrication Engineers.
Michael L. Greenwood was elected as a director of the
general partner of Hiland Partners in February 2005, and serves
as Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Hiland Partners Board
of Directors. Mr. Greenwood has served as a director of the
general partner of Hiland Holdings since September 2006, and
serves as chairman of the audit committee of the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors. Mr. Greenwood is founder and managing
director of Carnegie Capital LLC, a financial advisory services
firm providing investment banking assistance to the energy
industry. Mr. Greenwood previously served as Vice
President Finance and Treasurer of Energy Transfer
Partners, L.P. until August 2004. From July 2002 until its
merger with Energy Transfer in 2003, Mr. Greenwood served
as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer &
Treasurer of Heritage Propane Partners, L.P. Prior to joining
Heritage Propane, Mr. Greenwood was Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial
172
Officer and Treasurer for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. from
1994 to 2002. Mr. Greenwood has over 25 years of
diverse financial and management experience in the energy
industry during his career with several major public energy
companies, including MAPCO Inc., Penn Central Corporation and
The Williams Companies. Mr. Greenwood holds a Bachelor of
Science in Business Administration degree from Oklahoma State
University and a Master of Business Administration degree from
the University of Tulsa.
Edward D. Doherty was elected as a director of the
general partner of Hiland Partners in February 2005, and serves
as a member of the Audit Committee of the Hiland Partners Board
of Directors. Mr. Doherty has served as a director of the
general partner of Hiland Holdings since September 2006, and
serves as a member of the Audit Committee of the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors. Since March 2006, Mr. Doherty has been
a partial owner and CEO of ANZ Terminals Pty. Ltd., an
Australian company that owns and operates eight liquid storage
terminals in Australia and New Zealand. Mr. Doherty also
provides consulting services on terminal acquisitions.
Mr. Doherty served as the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Kaneb Pipe Line Company LLC, the general partner of
Kaneb Pipe Line Partners L.P. from its inception in September
1989 until July 2005. Prior to joining Kaneb, Mr. Doherty
was President and Chief Executive Officer of two private
companies, which provided restructuring services to troubled
companies and was President and Chief Executive Officer of
Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., a public refining and
petrochemical company. Mr. Doherty holds a Bachelor of Arts
degree from Lafayette College and a Doctor of Jurisprudence from
Columbia University School of Law.
Rayford T. Reid was elected as a director of the general
partner of Hiland Partners in May 2005, and serves as a member
of the Compensation Committee of the Hiland Partners Board of
Directors. Mr. Reid has served as a director of the general
partner of Hiland Holdings since September 2006, and serves as a
member of the Compensation Committee of the Hiland Holdings
Board of Directors. Mr. Reid has more than 35 years of
investment banking, financial advisory and commercial banking
experience, including 30 years focused on the oil and gas
industry. Mr. Reid is President of Kentucky Downs Partners,
LLC (KDP). KDPs principal business is the
ownership of a controlling interest in a thoroughbred horse
racing track in Franklin, Kentucky. Prior to forming KDP in
2007, Mr. Reid served as President of R. Reid Investments
Inc., a private investment banking firm, which exclusively
served companies engaged in the energy industry. Mr. Reid
holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Oklahoma State University
and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Wharton
School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Shelby E. Odell was elected as a director of the general
partner of Hiland Partners in September 2005. Mr. Odell
serves as a member of the Audit Committee of the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors, and, since January 21, 2009, has served
as a member of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee.
Mr. Odell served as a director of the general partner of
Hiland Holdings from September 2006 to January 2009.
Mr. Odell has 40 years of experience in the petroleum
business, including marketing, distribution, acquisitions,
innovation of new asset opportunities, and management. From 1974
to 2000, Mr. Odell held several positions with Koch
Industries. He retired in 2000 as President of Koch Hydrocarbon
Company and Sr. Vice President of Koch Industries. Prior to
joining Koch, Mr. Odell advanced through several positions
with Phillips Petroleum Company. He is a past member of the
Board of Directors of the Gas Processors Association and holds
an Associate Degree in Accounting from Enid Business College.
John T. McNabb, II was elected as a director of the
general partner of Hiland Partners in August 2006, and he serves
as chairman of the Hiland Partners Conflicts Committee and as a
member of the Compensation Committee of the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors. Mr. McNabb is the founder of Growth
Capital Partners, LP, a merchant banking firm that provides
financial advisory services to middle market companies
throughout the United States, and he has served as the Chairman
of its board of directors since 1992. Mr. McNabb was a
Managing Director of Bankers Trust Company, managing
commercial banking, investment banking and financial advisory
activities in the Southwest for Bankers Trust Company, and
a director of BT Southwest, Inc., an affiliate of Bankers
Trust New York Corporation. He currently serves as Chairman
of the board of directors of Willbros Group, Inc., a publicly
traded oil and gas contractor. He started his career, after
serving in the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam conflict,
with Mobil Oil in its exploration and production division.
Mr. McNabb holds a Bachelor of Arts in History and a
Masters of Business Administration from Duke University.
173
For information about the directors and officers of Hiland
Partners after the completion of the merger, see Special
Factors Effects of the Mergers Directors
and Management of Each Surviving Entity.
Hiland
Holdings
Directors are elected for one-year terms. The following table
shows information regarding the directors and executive officers
of Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC, as of the date of this
joint proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position with Our General Partner
|
|
Harold Hamm
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Joseph L. Griffin
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|
Matthew S. Harrison
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Vice
President Finance, Secretary and Director
|
Kent C. Christopherson
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Chief Operations Officer, Vice President
|
Michael L. Greenwood
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Director
|
Edward D. Doherty
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
Director
|
Rayford T. Reid
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
Dr. Cheryl L. Evans
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Director
|
Dr. Bobby B. Lyle
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director
|
For biographical information about Harold Hamm, Joseph L.
Griffin, Matthew S. Harrison, Kent C. Christopherson,
Edward D. Doherty, Michael L. Greenwood and Rayford T. Reid, see
Directors and Executive Officers of the Hiland
Companies Hiland Partners.
Dr. Cheryl L. Evans was elected as director of the
general partner of Hiland Holdings in September 2006, and serves
as a member of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee.
Dr. Evans is in her 15th year of service at
Northwestern Oklahoma State University and has been a faculty
member since 1994. In 2004, Dr. Evans was appointed Dean of
the institutions Enid campus. From 2002 to 2004,
Dr. Evans chaired the communication department on the Alva
campus, and from 1996 to 2002 she chaired the mass communication
department. She earned her doctorate at Oklahoma State
University in higher education, her Master of Arts in
communication degree at Wichita State University and her
Bachelor of Arts degree in mass communications/public relations
at Northwestern Oklahoma State University. Dr. Evans is a
2004 graduate of Harvards Management Development Program
for academic leaders. In addition to her administrative duties
for Northwestern Oklahoma State University, she presently
teaches in the Northwestern Oklahoma State University graduate
program. Dr. Evans is an active community volunteer and
currently serves on numerous civic and charitable boards.
Dr. Bobby B. Lyle was elected as director of the
general partner of Hiland Holdings in September 2006, and he
serves as chairman of the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee
and as a member of the Compensation Committee of the Hiland
Holdings Board of Directors. Dr. Lyle has over
29 years of experience in oil and gas exploration and
development. From 1977 to 1981, he was President of Cornell Oil
Company. In 1981, he formed Lyco Energy Corporation, and served
as its Chairman, President and CEO until the company was sold to
Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation in August 2005. After
assisting with the transition of ownership to Enerplus, he
formed Lyco Holdings Incorporated in March 2006 and currently
serves as its Chairman, President and CEO. Lyco Holdings
Incorporated is a private company engaged in private equity
investments and ranching. From 1968 to 1975, Dr. Lyle was a
member of the faculty of the Southern Methodist University
School of Business and served as Dean ad interim from
1970 to 1973 and Executive Dean from 1973 to 1975. Subsequently,
he served as Trustee of the University from 1982 to 2000 and
from 2006 to the present. Prior to joining SMU, he worked as a
professional engineer with General Dynamics and Geotech, a
Teledyne Industries company. He has helped organize and served
as director of a number of private companies covering a broad
range of industries, including banking, energy software, real
estate, retail, and home and industrial insulation.
Dr. Lyle has been an active member of numerous industry
organizations, including the Independent Petroleum Association
of America, where he served as regional Vice President and a
member of the Executive Committee, Texas Independent Producers
and Royalty Owners Association and the Texas Alliance for
Energy. Dr. Lyle holds a Bachelor of Science degree in
Mechanical Engineering from Louisiana Tech University; a Masters
in
174
Engineering Administration degree from Southern Methodist
University; and a Doctorate in Education, with emphasis on
Strategic Planning and Leadership in Higher Education, from the
University of Massachusetts.
For information about the directors and officers of Hiland
Partners after the completion of the merger, see Special
Factors Effects of the Mergers Directors
and Management of Each Surviving Entity.
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
Hiland
Partners
Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated
financial data relating to Hiland Partners. The selected
historical consolidated financial data has been derived from the
audited financial statements and selected financial data
contained in Hiland Partners Annual Report on
Form 10-K
dated for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the
Form 10-K),
and the unaudited financial statements contained in Hiland
Partners Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
(the
Form 10-Q)
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009. This data
should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated
financial statements and other financial information contained
in the Hiland Partners
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q,
including the notes thereto. More comprehensive financial
information is included in such reports (including
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations) and the following summary is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such reports and all
of the financial information and notes contained therein. See
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 191.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners, LP
|
|
|
Gas, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit and operating data)
|
|
|
Summary of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
52,348
|
|
|
$
|
91,479
|
|
|
$
|
387,999
|
|
|
$
|
278,043
|
|
|
$
|
219,686
|
|
|
$
|
166,601
|
|
|
$
|
98,296
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream purchases (exclusive of items shown separately below)
|
|
|
31,216
|
|
|
|
68,618
|
|
|
|
276,600
|
|
|
|
195,212
|
|
|
|
156,193
|
|
|
|
133,089
|
|
|
|
82,532
|
|
Operations and maintenance
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
|
|
6,769
|
|
|
|
30,526
|
|
|
|
23,279
|
|
|
|
16,071
|
|
|
|
7,359
|
|
|
|
4,933
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
|
|
|
9,971
|
|
|
|
8,929
|
|
|
|
37,502
|
|
|
|
29,855
|
|
|
|
22,130
|
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
4,127
|
|
Property impairments
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
8,753
|
|
|
|
7,587
|
|
|
|
4,994
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
52,772
|
|
|
|
86,617
|
|
|
|
353,685
|
|
|
|
255,933
|
|
|
|
199,388
|
|
|
|
154,030
|
|
|
|
92,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
4,862
|
|
|
|
34,314
|
|
|
|
22,110
|
|
|
|
20,298
|
|
|
|
12,571
|
|
|
|
5,641
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,353
|
)
|
|
|
(3,501
|
)
|
|
|
(13,639
|
)
|
|
|
(11,346
|
)
|
|
|
(5,532
|
)
|
|
|
(1,942
|
)
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
(407
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(2,489
|
)
|
|
|
(3,535
|
)
|
|
|
(13,867
|
)
|
|
|
(11,326
|
)
|
|
|
(5,616
|
)
|
|
|
(2,234
|
)
|
|
|
(764
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,913
|
)
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
|
|
20,447
|
|
|
|
10,784
|
|
|
|
14,682
|
|
|
|
10,337
|
|
|
|
4,877
|
|
Discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,913
|
)
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
|
|
20,447
|
|
|
|
10,784
|
|
|
|
14,682
|
|
|
|
10,337
|
|
|
$
|
4,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less income (loss) attributable to predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less general partner interest in net income (loss)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
|
|
6,572
|
|
|
|
4,526
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,855
|
)
|
|
$
|
(488
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,875
|
|
|
$
|
6,258
|
|
|
$
|
12,273
|
|
|
$
|
9,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners, LP
|
|
|
Gas, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit and operating data)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per limited partner unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions per limited partner unit(2)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
3.02
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
$
|
348,352
|
|
|
$
|
319,911
|
|
|
$
|
345,855
|
|
|
$
|
319,320
|
|
|
$
|
252,801
|
|
|
$
|
120,715
|
|
|
$
|
37,075
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
423,685
|
|
|
|
415,908
|
|
|
|
426,139
|
|
|
|
410,473
|
|
|
|
343,816
|
|
|
|
193,969
|
|
|
|
49,175
|
|
Accounts payable affiliates
|
|
|
3,615
|
|
|
|
10,534
|
|
|
|
7,662
|
|
|
|
7,880
|
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
6,122
|
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
268,294
|
|
|
|
234,952
|
|
|
|
256,466
|
|
|
|
226,104
|
|
|
|
147,064
|
|
|
|
33,784
|
|
|
|
12,643
|
|
Net equity
|
|
|
126,835
|
|
|
|
131,941
|
|
|
|
133,156
|
|
|
|
139,167
|
|
|
|
167,746
|
|
|
|
138,589
|
|
|
|
24,510
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
10,718
|
|
|
$
|
11,123
|
|
|
$
|
53,886
|
|
|
$
|
40,702
|
|
|
$
|
39,580
|
|
|
$
|
8,122
|
|
|
$
|
7,957
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(15,683
|
)
|
|
|
(10,397
|
)
|
|
|
(54,342
|
)
|
|
|
(83,408
|
)
|
|
|
(158,426
|
)
|
|
|
(74,888
|
)
|
|
|
(5,290
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
7,524
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(8,868
|
)
|
|
|
42,817
|
|
|
|
123,045
|
|
|
|
72,736
|
|
|
|
(2,946
|
)
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream segment margin
|
|
$
|
19,927
|
|
|
$
|
21,656
|
|
|
$
|
106,580
|
|
|
$
|
78,012
|
|
|
$
|
58,674
|
|
|
$
|
29,295
|
|
|
$
|
15,764
|
|
Compression segment margin
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
4,819
|
|
|
|
4,819
|
|
|
|
4,819
|
|
|
|
4,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment margin
|
|
$
|
21,132
|
|
|
$
|
22,861
|
|
|
$
|
111,399
|
|
|
$
|
82,831
|
|
|
$
|
63,493
|
|
|
$
|
33,512
|
|
|
$
|
15,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
9,560
|
|
|
$
|
13,891
|
|
|
$
|
72,162
|
|
|
$
|
52,395
|
|
|
$
|
42,751
|
|
|
$
|
23,875
|
|
|
$
|
9,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives
|
|
$
|
(270
|
)
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
(6,981
|
)
|
|
$
|
(373
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Non cash unit based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
371
|
|
|
$
|
1,538
|
|
|
$
|
951
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
5,994
|
|
|
$
|
3,423
|
|
|
$
|
3,434
|
|
|
$
|
2,225
|
|
|
$
|
1,693
|
|
Expansion capital expenditures
|
|
|
10,629
|
|
|
|
7,602
|
|
|
|
52,275
|
|
|
|
87,530
|
|
|
|
155,103
|
|
|
|
72,723
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
12,015
|
|
|
$
|
8,130
|
|
|
$
|
58,269
|
|
|
$
|
90,953
|
|
|
$
|
158,537
|
|
|
$
|
74,948
|
|
|
$
|
5,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income per unit is not applicable for periods prior to
Hiland Partners initial public offering. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Hiland Partners cash distributions of $0.8275 per
unit paid on May 14, 2008 for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, $0.45 per unit paid on February 13,
2009 for 2008, $0.795 per unit paid on February 14, 2008
for 2007, $0.7125 per unit paid on February 14, 2007 for
2006 and $0.625 per unit paid on February 14, 2006 for 2005. |
Hiland
Holdings
Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated
financial data relating to Hiland Holdings. The selected
historical consolidated financial data has been derived from the
financial statements and selected financial data contained in
Hiland Holdings Annual Report on
Form 10-K
dated for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the
Form 10-K)
and the unaudited financial statements contained in Hiland
Holdings Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the
Form 10-Q).
This data should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and other financial
information contained in the
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q,
including the notes thereto. More comprehensive financial
information is included in such report (including
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations) and the following summary is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such report and all of
the financial information and notes contained therein. See
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 191.
176
Because Hiland Holdings consolidated financial statements
include the results of Hiland Partners, Hiland Holdings
financial statements are substantially similar to the financial
statements of Hiland Partners and its predecessor, CGI. However,
Hiland Holdings consolidated balance sheet includes a
minority interest amount that reflects the proportion of Hiland
Partners owned by its unitholders other than Hiland Holdings.
Similarly, the ownership interests in Hiland Partners held by
its unitholders other than Hiland Holdings are reflected in
Hiland Holdings consolidated income statement as minority
interest. The minority interest amounts are not reflected on
Hiland Partners financial statements.
Certain adjustments have been made to prior period information
to conform to current period presentation related to Hiland
Holdings adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an Amendment of
ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160) which
established new accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling partners interest in Hiland Partners.
Specifically, SFAS 160 requires the recognition of a
noncontrolling interest (minority interests) as equity in the
consolidated financial statements and separate from our limited
partners equity. The amount of net income attributable to
the noncontrolling interest is now included in consolidated net
income on the face of the statement of operations. SFAS 160
also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding our
limited partners interest and the noncontrolling
partners interest. The adoption of SFAS 160 on
January 1, 2009 did not have a significant impact on Hiland
Holdings financial position, results of operations or cash
flows. However, it did result in certain changes to Hiland
Holdings financial statement presentation, including the
change in classification of noncontrolling interest (minority
interests) from liabilities to equity on the consolidated
balance sheet.
Upon adoption of SFAS 160 effective January 1, 2009,
Hiland Holdings reclassified $125,851, $126,409 and $137,302
from minority interests liabilities to noncontrolling
partners interest in Hiland Partners, of which $123,729,
$128,713 and $135,513 are separate components of equity and
$2,122, $(2,304) and $1,789 are increases (decreases) to
accumulated other comprehensive income, also components of
equity, in our consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Additionally, Hiland Holdings reclassified $209 of minority
interest in loss of Hiland Partners to net loss attributable to
noncontrolling partners interest in loss of Hiland
Partners in our consolidated statement of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and reclassified $5,902,
$2,635 and $10,164 of minority interest in income of Hiland
Partners to net income attributable to noncontrolling
partners interest in income of Hiland Partners in our
consolidated statement of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the
year ended December 31, 2005, Hiland Holdings reclassified
$9,380 of minority interest in income of Hiland Partners to net
income attributable to noncontrolling partners interest in
income of Hiland Partners. Net income per limited partner unit
has not been affected as a result of the adoption of
SFAS 160.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hiland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners GP,
|
|
|
Continental
|
|
|
|
Hiland Holdings GP, LP
|
|
|
LLC
|
|
|
Gas, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit and operating data)
|
|
|
Summary of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
52,348
|
|
|
$
|
91,479
|
|
|
$
|
387,999
|
|
|
$
|
278,043
|
|
|
$
|
219,686
|
|
|
$
|
166,601
|
|
|
$
|
98,296
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream purchases (exclusive of items shown separately below)
|
|
|
31,216
|
|
|
|
68,618
|
|
|
|
276,600
|
|
|
|
195,212
|
|
|
|
156,193
|
|
|
|
133,089
|
|
|
|
82,532
|
|
Operations and maintenance
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
|
|
6,769
|
|
|
|
30,526
|
|
|
|
23,279
|
|
|
|
16,071
|
|
|
|
7,359
|
|
|
|
4,933
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
|
|
|
10,258
|
|
|
|
9,216
|
|
|
|
38,650
|
|
|
|
31,002
|
|
|
|
22,863
|
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
4,127
|
|
Property impairments
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
|
10,337
|
|
|
|
9,321
|
|
|
|
5,299
|
|
|
|
2,542
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
53,946
|
|
|
|
87,287
|
|
|
|
356,417
|
|
|
|
258,814
|
|
|
|
200,426
|
|
|
|
154,102
|
|
|
|
92,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,598
|
)
|
|
|
4,192
|
|
|
|
31,582
|
|
|
|
19,229
|
|
|
|
19,260
|
|
|
|
12,499
|
|
|
|
5,641
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hiland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners GP,
|
|
|
Continental
|
|
|
|
Hiland Holdings GP, LP
|
|
|
LLC
|
|
|
Gas, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit and operating data)
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,357
|
)
|
|
|
(3,506
|
)
|
|
|
(13,674
|
)
|
|
|
(11,371
|
)
|
|
|
(6,543
|
)
|
|
|
(1,942
|
)
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(663
|
)
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net:
|
|
|
(2,515
|
)
|
|
|
(3,558
|
)
|
|
|
(13,980
|
)
|
|
|
(11,425
|
)
|
|
|
(6,733
|
)
|
|
|
(2,234
|
)
|
|
|
(764
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(4,113
|
)
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
17,602
|
|
|
|
7,804
|
|
|
|
12,527
|
|
|
|
10,265
|
|
|
|
4,877
|
|
Discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(4,113
|
)
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
17,602
|
|
|
|
7,804
|
|
|
|
12,527
|
|
|
|
10,265
|
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
Loss attributable to predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(407
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners interest in net income (loss)
|
|
|
(4,113
|
)
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
17,602
|
|
|
|
7,804
|
|
|
|
12,120
|
|
|
|
10,265
|
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
Less: noncontrolling partners interest in income (loss) of
Hiland Partners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,494
|
|
|
|
5,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliate
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
5,902
|
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,899
|
)
|
|
$
|
840
|
|
|
$
|
11,700
|
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
$
|
1,956
|
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
$
|
4,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per limited partner unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions per limited partner unit(2)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
$
|
351,544
|
|
|
$
|
323,552
|
|
|
$
|
349,159
|
|
|
$
|
323,073
|
|
|
$
|
257,003
|
|
|
$
|
120,715
|
|
|
$
|
37,075
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
432,697
|
|
|
|
425,671
|
|
|
|
435,560
|
|
|
|
420,286
|
|
|
|
355,198
|
|
|
|
194,085
|
|
|
|
49,175
|
|
Accounts payable affiliates
|
|
|
3,784
|
|
|
|
10,638
|
|
|
|
7,823
|
|
|
|
7,957
|
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
268,294
|
|
|
|
235,307
|
|
|
|
256,466
|
|
|
|
226,459
|
|
|
|
147,318
|
|
|
|
33,784
|
|
|
|
12,643
|
|
Limited partners equity
|
|
|
13,168
|
|
|
|
14,735
|
|
|
|
17,619
|
|
|
|
19,831
|
|
|
|
42,946
|
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
24,510
|
|
Noncontrolling partners interest in Hiland Partners
|
|
|
121,044
|
|
|
|
126,354
|
|
|
|
123,729
|
|
|
|
128,713
|
|
|
|
135,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
134,212
|
|
|
|
141,089
|
|
|
|
141,348
|
|
|
|
148,544
|
|
|
|
178,459
|
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
24,510
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
10,167
|
|
|
$
|
10,745
|
|
|
$
|
52,484
|
|
|
$
|
39,379
|
|
|
$
|
38,476
|
|
|
$
|
8,159
|
|
|
$
|
7,957
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(15,683
|
)
|
|
|
(10,397
|
)
|
|
|
(54,342
|
)
|
|
|
(83,408
|
)
|
|
|
(158,426
|
)
|
|
|
(74,888
|
)
|
|
|
(5,290
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
7,874
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
(7,011
|
)
|
|
|
44,062
|
|
|
|
124,201
|
|
|
|
72,830
|
|
|
|
(2,946
|
)
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream segment margin
|
|
$
|
19,927
|
|
|
$
|
21,656
|
|
|
$
|
106,580
|
|
|
$
|
78,012
|
|
|
$
|
58,674
|
|
|
$
|
29,295
|
|
|
$
|
15,764
|
|
Compression segment margin
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
4,819
|
|
|
|
4,819
|
|
|
|
4,819
|
|
|
|
4,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment margin
|
|
$
|
21,132
|
|
|
$
|
22,861
|
|
|
$
|
111,399
|
|
|
$
|
82,831
|
|
|
$
|
63,493
|
|
|
$
|
33,512
|
|
|
$
|
15,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
5,994
|
|
|
$
|
3,423
|
|
|
$
|
3,434
|
|
|
$
|
2,225
|
|
|
$
|
1,693
|
|
Expansion capital expenditures
|
|
|
10,629
|
|
|
|
7,602
|
|
|
|
52,275
|
|
|
|
87,530
|
|
|
|
155,103
|
|
|
|
72,723
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
12,015
|
|
|
$
|
8,130
|
|
|
$
|
58,269
|
|
|
$
|
90,953
|
|
|
$
|
158,537
|
|
|
$
|
74,948
|
|
|
$
|
5,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
(0.66
|
)
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income per unit is not applicable for periods prior to our
initial public offering. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes our cash distribution of $0.10 per unit paid on
February 18, 2009 for 2008, $0.255 per unit paid on
February 19, 2008 for 2007 and $0.2075 per unit paid on
February 19, 2007 for 2006. |
178
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures of Hiland Partners
This joint proxy statement includes the non-GAAP financial
measures of (1) EBITDA and (2) total segment margin,
which consists of midstream segment margin and compression
segment margin.
Hiland Partners defines EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, as
net income (loss) plus interest expense, provision for income
taxes and depreciation, amortization and accretion expense.
EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by management
and by external users of its financial statements such as
investors, commercial banks, research analysts and others to
assess: (1) the financial performance of Hiland
Partners assets without regard to financing methods,
capital structure or historical cost basis; (2) the ability
of Hiland Partners assets to generate cash sufficient to
pay interest costs and support our indebtedness; (3) Hiland
Partners operating performance and return on capital as
compared to those of other companies in the midstream energy
sector, without regard to financing or structure; and
(4) the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure
projects and the overall rates of return on alternative
investment opportunities. EBITDA is also a financial measurement
that, with certain negotiated adjustments, is reported to Hiland
Partners banks and is used as a gauge for compliance with
financial covenants under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income
(loss), operating income, cash flows from operating activities
or any other measure of financial performance presented in
accordance with GAAP. Hiland Partners EBITDA may not be
comparable to EBITDA of similarly titled measures of other
entities, as other entities may not calculate EBITDA in the same
manner as Hiland Partners does.
Hiland Partners views total segment margin, a non-GAAP financial
measure, as an important performance measure of the core
profitability of its operations because it is directly related
to Hiland Partners volumes and commodity price changes.
Hiland Partners reviews total segment margin monthly for
consistency and trend analysis. Hiland Partners defines
midstream segment margin as midstream revenue less midstream
purchases. Midstream revenue includes revenue from the sale of
natural gas, NGLs and NGL products resulting from Hiland
Partners gathering, treating, processing and fractionation
activities and fixed fees associated with the gathering of
natural gas and the transportation and disposal of saltwater.
Midstream purchases include the following costs and expenses:
cost of natural gas and NGLs purchased by us from third parties,
cost of natural gas and NGLs purchased by Hiland Partners from
affiliates, and costs of crude oil purchased by Hiland Partners
from third parties. Hiland Partners defines compression segment
margin as the payments received under its compression services
agreement with Continental Resources, Inc.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the non-GAAP
financial measures of (1) EBITDA to the GAAP financial
measure of net income and (2) total segment margin (which
consists of the sum of midstream segment margin and compression
segment margin) to operating income, in each case, on a
historical basis for each of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners, LP
|
|
|
Gas, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDA to
Net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,327
|
|
|
$
|
20,447
|
|
|
$
|
10,784
|
|
|
$
|
14,682
|
|
|
$
|
10,337
|
|
|
$
|
4,912
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
|
|
|
9,971
|
|
|
|
8,929
|
|
|
|
37,502
|
|
|
|
29,855
|
|
|
|
22,130
|
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
4,127
|
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
|
13,639
|
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
|
5,532
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
9,560
|
|
|
$
|
13,891
|
|
|
$
|
72,162
|
|
|
$
|
52,395
|
|
|
$
|
42,751
|
|
|
$
|
23,875
|
|
|
$
|
9,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners, LP
|
|
|
Gas, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Total Segment Margin to Operating Income
(Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(424
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,862
|
|
|
$
|
34,314
|
|
|
$
|
22,110
|
|
|
$
|
20,298
|
|
|
$
|
12,571
|
|
|
$
|
5,641
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations and maintenance expenses
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
|
|
6,769
|
|
|
|
30,526
|
|
|
|
23,279
|
|
|
|
16,071
|
|
|
|
7,359
|
|
|
|
4,933
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
|
|
|
9,971
|
|
|
|
8,929
|
|
|
|
37,502
|
|
|
|
29,855
|
|
|
|
22,130
|
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
4,127
|
|
Property impairments
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on asset sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
8,753
|
|
|
|
7,587
|
|
|
|
4,994
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment margin
|
|
$
|
21,132
|
|
|
$
|
22,861
|
|
|
$
|
111,399
|
|
|
$
|
82,831
|
|
|
$
|
63,493
|
|
|
$
|
33,512
|
|
|
$
|
15,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
COMMON
UNIT MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Common
Unit Price Information
Hiland
Partners
Hiland Partners common units trade on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market under the symbol HLND. On June 1, 2009,
the last trading day prior to the public announcement of the
execution of the merger agreements, the high and low reported
sales price for the Hiland Partners common units was $5.77 per
unit and $5.34 per unit, respectively.
On ,
2009, the most recent practicable date before the printing of
this joint proxy statement, high and low reported sales prices
of Hiland Partners common units were
$ and
$ , respectively and there were
approximately
common unitholders, including beneficial owners of common units
held in street name, and one record holder of our subordinated
units. There is no established public trading market for Hiland
Partners subordinated units.
The following table shows the high and low sales prices per
common unit, as reported by the NASDAQ National Market, for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit
|
|
|
|
Price Ranges
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Period from April 1, 2009 to June 26, 2009
|
|
$
|
8.25
|
|
|
$
|
5.26
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
11.98
|
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended December 31
|
|
$
|
36.49
|
|
|
$
|
3.64
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30
|
|
$
|
50.44
|
|
|
$
|
33.95
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30
|
|
$
|
52.00
|
|
|
$
|
43.11
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31
|
|
$
|
51.23
|
|
|
$
|
41.83
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended December 31
|
|
$
|
53.00
|
|
|
$
|
41.60
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30
|
|
$
|
60.50
|
|
|
$
|
46.02
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30
|
|
$
|
61.75
|
|
|
$
|
52.05
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31
|
|
$
|
58.49
|
|
|
$
|
52.54
|
|
Hiland
Holdings
Hiland Holdings common units trade on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market under the symbol HPGP. On June 1, 2009,
the last trading day prior to the public announcement of the
execution of the merger agreements, the high and low reported
sales price for the Hiland Holdings common units were $1.87 per
unit and $1.63 per unit, respectively.
On ,
2009, the most recent practicable date before the printing of
this joint proxy statement, high and low reported sales prices
of Hiland Holdings common units were
$ and
$ , respectively and there were
approximately
common unitholders, including beneficial owners of common units
held in street name.
181
The following table shows the high and low prices per common
unit, as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market, for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit
|
|
|
|
Price Ranges
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Period from April 1, 2009 to June 26, 2009
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
5.07
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended December 31
|
|
$
|
21.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30
|
|
$
|
27.22
|
|
|
$
|
18.51
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30
|
|
$
|
28.08
|
|
|
$
|
22.12
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31
|
|
$
|
28.90
|
|
|
$
|
21.08
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended December 31
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
$
|
22.49
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30
|
|
$
|
42.22
|
|
|
$
|
25.81
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30
|
|
$
|
35.95
|
|
|
$
|
27.35
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
$
|
26.65
|
|
Distribution
Information
Hiland
Partners
Hiland Partners considers cash distributions to unitholders on a
quarterly basis, although there is no assurance as to the future
cash distributions since they are dependent upon future
earnings, cash flows, capital requirements, financial condition
and other factors. Hiland Partners ability to distribute
available cash is contractually restricted by the terms of the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. The Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement contains covenants requiring Hiland Partners to
maintain certain financial ratios, which are tested quarterly.
Hiland Partners ability to remain in compliance with these
restrictions and covenants in the future is uncertain and will
be affected by the levels of cash flow from its operations and
events or circumstances beyond Hiland Partners control.
Hiland Partners is prohibited from making any distributions to
unitholders if the distribution would cause an event of default,
or an event of default exists, under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement.
On April 24, 2009, the Hiland Partners Board of Directors
voted to suspend quarterly distributions with respect to Hiland
Partners common units and subordinated units beginning with the
first quarter distribution of 2009, based on the Hiland Partners
Board of Directors consideration of the impact of lower
commodity prices and drilling activity on Hiland Partners
current and projected throughput volumes, midstream segment
margins and cash flows, as well as future required levels of
capital expenditures and the level of Hiland Partners
outstanding indebtedness under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement.
Under the terms of the Hiland Partners merger agreement, Hiland
Partners is prohibited from paying distributions to its
unitholders without the prior written consent of Parent.
182
The following table shows the cash distributions paid per common
unit and subordinated unit during the first quarter of 2009 and
each quarter of the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Cash distributions shown below were paid within 45 days
after the end of each applicable quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Distribution
|
|
|
|
Paid Per Unit
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.0000
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended December 31
|
|
$
|
0.4500
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30
|
|
$
|
0.8800
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30
|
|
$
|
0.8625
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31
|
|
$
|
0.8275
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended December 31
|
|
$
|
0.7950
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30
|
|
$
|
0.7550
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30
|
|
$
|
0.7325
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31
|
|
$
|
0.7125
|
|
Hiland
Holdings
Hiland Holdings considers cash distributions to unitholders on a
quarterly basis, although there is no assurance as to the future
cash distributions since they are dependent upon future
earnings, cash flows, capital requirements, financial condition
and other factors. In particular, Hiland Holdings ability
to distribute available cash to its common unitholders is
dependent on its receipt of distributions from Hiland Partners.
Hiland Holdings ability to distribute available cash is
contractually restricted by the terms of Hiland Holdings
credit facility. Hiland Holdings credit facility contains
covenants requiring Hiland Holdings to maintain certain
financial ratios. Hiland Holdings is prohibited from making any
distributions to unitholders if the distribution would cause an
event of default, or an event of default exists, under its
credit facility.
On April 24, 2009, the Hiland Holdings Board of Directors
voted to suspend quarterly distributions with respect to Hiland
Holdings partnership units beginning with the first quarter
distribution of 2009, based on the Hiland Holdings Board of
Directors consideration of the impact of lower commodity
prices and drilling activity on Hiland Partners current
and projected throughput volumes, midstream segment margins and
cash flows, as well as future required levels of capital
expenditures and the level of Hiland Partners outstanding
indebtedness under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
Under the terms of the Hiland Holdings merger agreement, Hiland
Holdings is prohibited from paying distributions to its
unitholders without the prior written consent of Parent.
183
The following table shows the cash distributions paid during the
first quarter of 2009 and each quarter of the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007. Cash distributions shown below
were paid within 50 days after the end of each applicable
quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Distribution
|
|
|
|
Paid Per Unit
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.0000
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended December 31
|
|
$
|
0.1000
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30
|
|
$
|
0.3175
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30
|
|
$
|
0.3050
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31
|
|
$
|
0.2800
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended December 31
|
|
$
|
0.2550
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30
|
|
$
|
0.2300
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30
|
|
$
|
0.2200
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31
|
|
$
|
0.2075
|
|
184
INFORMATION
CONCERNING HAROLD HAMM, PARENT AND MERGER SUBS
Parent was formed on February 3, 2005 as an Oklahoma
limited liability company. Mr. Hamm is the sole member of
Parent, and Parent is the sole member of both HLND Merger Sub
and HPGP Merger Sub. Each of HLND Merger Sub and HPGP Merger Sub
was formed on May 8, 2009 by its sole member. Each of HLND
Merger Sub and HPGP Merger Sub was formed solely for the purpose
of effecting the Hiland Partners merger and the Hiland Holdings
merger, respectively. Neither HLND Merger Sub, nor HPGP Merger
Sub has conducted any activities other than those incident to
its formation and the matters contemplated by the Hiland
Partners merger agreement and the Hiland Holdings merger
agreement, respectively, including the preparation of applicable
filings under the securities laws. It is expected that the Hamm
family trusts will subscribe for limited liability company units
in HLND Merger Sub immediately prior to the effective time of
the Hiland Partners merger, thereby reducing
Mr. Hamms capital commitment and ultimate ownership
of HLND Merger Sub. Upon completion of the Hiland Partners
merger, HLND Merger Sub will merge with and into Hiland Partners
with Hiland Partners being the surviving entity in the Hiland
Partners merger as a subsidiary of Parent, Hiland Holdings and
the Hamm family trusts whose limited liability company units
shall be converted into common units of the surviving entity on
a one-for-one basis. It is expected that the Hamm family trusts
will subscribe for limited liability company units in HPGP
Merger Sub immediately prior to the effective time of the Hiland
Holdings merger, thereby reducing Mr. Hamms capital
commitment and ultimate ownership of HPGP Merger Sub. Likewise,
upon completion of the Hiland Holdings merger, HPGP Merger Sub
will merge with and into Hiland Holdings with Hiland Holdings
being the surviving entity of the Hiland Partners merger as a
subsidiary of Parent, Continental Gas, Harold Hamm and the Hamm
family trusts.
Parent owns 100% of the membership interest in the general
partner of Hiland Holdings and is principally engaged in the
business of serving as the sole member of the general partner of
Hiland Holdings. Parent has not conducted activities other than
those incident to serving as the sole member of the general
partner of Hiland Holdings and the matters contemplated by the
both the Hiland Partners merger agreement and Hiland Holdings
merger agreement, including the preparation of applicable
filings under the securities laws.
The business address and telephone number of each of Parent,
HLND Merger Sub and HPGP Merger Sub is
c/o HH
GP Holding, LLC, 302 North Independence, Enid, Oklahoma 73701,
(580) 233-8955,
Attention: Harold Hamm.
At the closing of the Hiland Partners merger and the Hiland
Holdings merger, Parents sole member will be Mr. Hamm.
During the past five years, none of the persons or entities
described above has been (i) convicted in a criminal
proceeding or (ii) party to any judicial or administrative
proceeding (except for matters that were dismissed without
sanction or settlement) that resulted in a judgment, decree or
final order enjoining the entity from future violations of, or
prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities
laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state
securities laws.
185
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF PARENT AND MERGER SUBS
Set forth below are the names, the present principal occupations
or employment and the name, principal business address of any
corporation or other organization in which such occupation or
employment is conducted, and the five-year employment history of
each of the current sole member and executive officers of Parent
and the current sole director and executive officers of each of
HLND Merger Sub and HPGP Merger Sub, respectively.
Harold Hamm, 63, Sole Member and President of HH GP Holding, LLC
since February 3, 2005. Mr. Hamm has served as
Chairman of the Board of Directors of (i) the general
partner of Hiland Partners since October 2004, and (ii) the
general partner of Hiland Holdings since May 2006. In December
1994, Mr. Hamm began serving as President and Chief
Executive Officer and as a director of Continental Gas, Inc.,
and he subsequently served as Chief Executive Officer and
director of Continental Gas, Inc. until 2004. Since its
inception in 1967 until October 2005, Mr. Hamm served as
President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of
Continental Resources, Inc. and currently serves as its Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of its board of directors.
Mr. Hamm is also immediate past President of the National
Stripper Well Association, a member of the executive board of
the Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association and a member of
the executive board of the Oklahoma Energy Explorers. In
addition, Mr. Hamm is a director of Complete Production
Services, Inc., a publicly traded oilfield service company.
Matthew Harrison, 39, Vice President and Secretary of HH GP
Holding, LLC since June 1, 2009. Mr. Harrison has
served as Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
Finance, Secretary and a director of the general partners of
each of Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings since April 2008.
Mr. Harrison joined the Hiland Companies as Vice President
of Business Development in February 2008 from Wachovia
Securities, where he most recently was a director for its
Energy & Power Mergers & Acquisitions Group.
Prior to joining Wachovia Securities in 2007, Mr. Harrison
spent eight years with A.G. Edwards Capital Markets
Mergers & Acquisitions Group, most recently leading
its energy mergers & acquisitions effort. Prior to
joining A.G. Edwards, Mr. Harrison spent five years with
Price Waterhouse, LLP, the predecessor of
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP as a senior accountant. He holds a
B.S. degree in Accounting from the University of Tennessee, a
Masters of Business Administration degree from Kellogg Graduate
School of Management at Northwestern University and is a
certified public accountant.
During the past five years, none of the persons described above
has been (i) convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding
traffic violations or similar misdemeanors) or (ii) party
to any judicial or administrative proceeding (except for matters
that were dismissed without sanction or settlement) that
resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the
person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities
subject to, federal or state securities laws or a finding of any
violation of federal or state securities laws. Each person
identified above is a United States citizen.
186
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Beneficial
Ownership of Hiland Partners
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of
Hiland Partners units as of June 26, 2009 held by each
person who beneficially owned more than 5% or more of the then
outstanding units and all of the directors, named executive
officers, and directors and executive officers as a group of the
general partner of Hiland Partners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Total Units
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Harold Hamm(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
2,321,471
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
%
|
|
|
3,060,000
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
Hiland Holdings GP, LP(1)(3)
|
|
|
2,321,471
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
%
|
|
|
3,060,000
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
Joseph L. Griffin(1)
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Matthew S. Harrison(1)
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kent C. Christopherson(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael L. Greenwood(1)(2)(4)
|
|
|
13,291
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Edward D. Doherty(1)(2)(4)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Rayford T. Reid(1)(2)(4)
|
|
|
11,818
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Shelby E. Odell(1)(2)(4)
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John T. McNabb, II(1)(5)
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.(6)
|
|
|
541,552
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
2,377,387
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|
|
3,060,000
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
58.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
The address of this person is 205 West Maple,
Suite 1100, Enid, Oklahoma 73701. |
|
(2) |
|
These individuals each hold an ownership interest in Hiland
Holdings GP, LP as indicated in the following table. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Hamm indirectly owns 100% of Hiland Partners GP
Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Holdings GP, LP.
Accordingly, Mr. Hamm is deemed to be the beneficial owner
of the 2,321,471 common units and 3,060,000 subordinated units
held by Hiland Holdings GP, LP. |
|
(4) |
|
500, 500, 750 and 1,000 of the indicated common units are
restricted common units that vest on the anniversary of each
grant date over periods of one, two, three and four years,
respectively. |
|
(5) |
|
1,000, 750 and 1,000 of the indicated common units are
restricted common units that vest on the anniversary of each
grant date over periods of two, three and four years,
respectively. |
|
(6) |
|
Represents holdings as of March 31, 2009 as reported on
Form 13F filed on May 12, 2009. The address of this
person is 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Second Floor, Los Angeles,
CA 90067. |
Beneficial
Ownership of Interests in Hiland Partners by Hiland
Holdings
Hiland Holdings GP, LP owns all of Hiland Partners 2% general
partner interest, all of the incentive distributions rights in
Hiland Partners, 2,321,471 of Hiland Partners common units and
3,060,000 of Hiland Partners subordinated units.
187
Beneficial
Ownership of Hiland Holdings
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of units
of Hiland Holdings GP, LP as of June 26, 2009 held by each
person who beneficially owned more than 5% or more of the then
outstanding units and all of the directors, named executive
officers, and directors and executive officers as a group of
Hiland Holdings GP, LP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Harold Hamm(2)
|
|
|
8,540,950
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
Continental Gas Holdings, Inc.(2)
|
|
|
8,481,350
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
Harold Hamm DST Trust(2)
|
|
|
2,757,390
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
Harold Hamm HJ Trust(2)
|
|
|
1,839,712
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
Joseph L. Griffin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Matthew S. Harrison
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kent C. Christopherson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael L. Greenwood(3)
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Edward D. Doherty(3)
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Rayford T. Reid(3)
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. Cheryl L. Evans(3)
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. Bobby B. Lyle(3)
|
|
|
63,904
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Swank Capital, LLC(4)
|
|
|
1,673,577
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
8,646,854
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
The address of each person listed above is 205 West Maple,
Suite 1100, Enid, Oklahoma 73701, except for (a) the
Harold Hamm DST Trust and the Harold Hamm HJ Trust, which
Mr. Bert H. Mackie is the trustee for both trusts and his
address is 302 N. Independence, Enid, Oklahoma 73701
and (b) Swank Capital, whose address is 3300 Oak Lawn
Avenue, Suite 650, Dallas, TX 75219. |
|
(2) |
|
Harold Hamm, the Harold Hamm DST Trust and the Harold Hamm HJ
Trust have a 90.7%, 5.6% and a 3.7% ownership interest,
respectively, in Continental Gas Holdings, Inc., which
beneficially owns 8,481,350 common units. Thus, if the
beneficial ownership of Harold Hamm, the Harold Hamm DST Trust
and the Harold Hamm HJ Trust in the common units were shown in
proportion to their respective ownership interest in Continental
Gas Holdings, Inc., the common units beneficially owned in the
above table would be 7,752,184 for Harold Hamm, 3,232,346 for
the Harold Hamm DST Trust and 2,153,522 for the Harold Hamm HJ
Trust, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
1,000, 750 and 1,000 of the indicated common units are
restricted common units that vest on the anniversary of each
grant date over periods of two, three and four years,
respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents holdings as of March 31, 2009 as reported on
Form 13F filed on May 15, 2009. |
188
CERTAIN
PURCHASES AND SALES OF HILAND COMPANIES COMMON UNITS
Hiland
Partners
Except as set forth below, there have been no transactions in
Hiland Partners common units during the past 60 days by
Hiland Partners, Hiland Holdings or the Hamm Continuing
Investors, HLND Merger Sub or HPGP Merger Sub or their
directors, executive officers or controlling persons or by any
pension, profit-sharing or similar plan of Hiland Partners or
Hiland Holdings or the Hamm Continuing Investors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Person
|
|
Transaction Type
|
|
Date
|
|
Number of Units
|
|
Price per Unit
|
|
Joseph L. Griffin
|
|
Conversion of phantom units
|
|
6/19/2009
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
$7.33
|
|
There have been no purchases of Hiland Partners common units
during the past two years effected by any of Hiland Partners,
Hiland Holdings or the Hamm Continuing Investors, HLND Merger
Sub or HPGP Merger Sub.
Hiland
Holdings
Except as set forth below, there have been no transactions in
Hiland Holdings common units during the past 60 days by
Hiland Holdings, Hiland Partners or the Hamm Continuing
Investors, HLND Merger Sub or HPGP Merger Sub, or their
directors, executive officers or controlling persons or by any
pension, profit-sharing or similar plan of Hiland Holdings or
Hiland Partners or the Hamm Continuing Investors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Person
|
|
Transaction Type
|
|
Date
|
|
Number of Units
|
|
Price per Units
|
|
The following table shows purchases of Hiland Holdings common
units during the past two years effected by any of Hiland
Holdings, Hiland Partners or the Hamm Continuing Investors, HLND
Merger Sub or HPGP Merger Sub, showing the number of units of
Hiland Holdings common units purchased by each, the range of
prices paid for those units and the average price paid per
quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 6/30/2007
|
Name of Filer
|
|
Amount of Units Purchased
|
|
Range of Prices Paid
|
|
Average Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 9/30/2007
|
Name of Filer
|
|
Amount of Units Purchased
|
|
Range of Prices Paid
|
|
Average Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 12/31/2007
|
Name of Filer
|
|
Amount of Units Purchased
|
|
Range of Prices Paid
|
|
Average Purchase Price
|
|
Harold Hamm
|
|
|
40,300
|
|
|
|
$23.60 - $24.41
|
|
|
|
$24.18
|
|
Harold Hamm DST Trust
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
$24.23 - $24.29
|
|
|
|
$24.27
|
|
Harold Hamm HJ Trust
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
$24.23 - $24.29
|
|
|
|
$24.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 3/31/2008
|
Name of Filer
|
|
Amount of Units Purchased
|
|
Range of Prices Paid
|
|
Average Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 6/30/2008
|
Name of Filer
|
|
Amount of Units Purchased
|
|
Range of Prices Paid
|
|
Average Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 9/30/2008
|
Name of Filer
|
|
Amount of Units Purchased
|
|
Range of Prices Paid
|
|
Average Purchase Price
|
|
Harold Hamm
|
|
|
19,300
|
|
|
|
$21.95 - $22.50
|
|
|
|
$22.08
|
|
Harold Hamm DST Trust
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
$22.07 - $22.15
|
|
|
|
$22.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 12/31/2008
|
Name of Filer
|
|
Amount of Units Purchased
|
|
Range of Prices Paid
|
|
Average Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 3/31/2009
|
Name of Filer
|
|
Amount of Units Purchased
|
|
Range of Prices Paid
|
|
Average Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended 3/31/2009 to 6/26/09
|
Name of Filer
|
|
Amount of Units Purchased
|
|
Range of Prices Paid
|
|
Average Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings file annual, quarterly and
special reports, proxy statements and other information with the
SEC. These reports, proxy statements and other information
contain additional information about the Hiland Companies. Each
of the Hiland Companies will make these materials available for
inspection and copying by any of its unitholders, or a
representative of any unitholder who is so designated in
writing, at its executive offices during regular business hours.
Because the mergers are each a going private
transaction, the HLND
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons have filed with the SEC a Transaction Statement
on
Schedule 13E-3
with respect to the proposed Hiland Partners merger and the HPGP
Schedule 13E-3
Filing Persons have filed with the SEC a Transaction Statement
on
Schedule 13E-3
with respect to the proposed Hiland Holdings merger. Each
Schedule 13E-3,
including any amendments and exhibits filed or incorporated by
reference as a part of it, is available for inspection as set
forth above. Each
Schedule 13E-3
will be amended to report promptly any material changes in the
information set forth in the most recent
Schedule 13E-3
filed with the SEC with respect to each merger.
The Hiland Companies also makes available on their joint website
(www.hilandpartners.com) under Investor
Relations the annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed by each of the Hiland
Companies.
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings unitholders may read and
copy the
Schedule 13E-3
and any reports, statements or other information filed by the
Hiland Company in which they own units at the SEC public
reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the operation of the public reference
rooms. Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings filings
with the SEC are also available to the public from commercial
document retrieval services and at the website maintained by the
SEC located at: www.sec.gov.
The SEC allows the Hiland Companies to incorporate by
reference information into this joint proxy statement.
This means that the Hiland Companies may disclose important
information by referring to another document filed separately
with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is
considered to be part of this joint proxy statement. This joint
proxy statement and the information that Hiland Partners or
Hiland Holdings file later with the SEC may update and supersede
the information incorporated by reference. Similarly, the
information that Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings later files
with the SEC may update and supersede the information in this
joint proxy statement. In addition to such documents
specifically incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement, Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings incorporate by
reference in this joint proxy statement each document that
Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings files under
Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
after the date of the initial filing of this joint proxy
statement and before the special meeting, other than information
furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 or Item 7.01 of
Form 8-K.
Hiland Partners and Hiland Holdings also incorporate by
reference into this joint proxy statement the following
documents filed by Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings with the
SEC under the Exchange Act:
Hiland
Partners Filings with the SEC (File
No. 000-51120)
|
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009; and
|
|
|
|
Hiland Partners Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on March 6, 2009, March 11, 2009,
March 13, 2009, April 21, 2009, June 1, 2009 and
June 30, 2009 (other than information furnished pursuant to
Item 2.02 or Item 7.01 of any listed Current Report on
Form 8-K).
|
Hiland
Holdings Filings with the SEC (File
No. 001-33018)
|
|
|
|
|
Hiland Holdings Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
Hiland Holdings Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009; and
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
Hiland Holdings Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 23, 2009, January 28,
2009, March 6, 2009, March 11, 2009, June 1, 2009
and July 1, 2009 (other than information furnished pursuant
to Item 2.02 or Item 7.01 of any listed Current Report
on
Form 10-K).
|
The Hiland Companies will provide a copy of any document
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement and any
exhibit specifically incorporated by reference in those
documents, without charge, by written or oral request directed
to the applicable Hiland Company at the following address and
telephone number:
205 West Maple, Suite 1100
Enid, Oklahoma 73701
Attention: Director Business Development and
Investor Relations
(580) 242-6040
or
The opinion of Barclays and the presentations Barclays made to
the Hiland Holdings Conflicts Committee will be made available
for inspection and copying at the principal executive offices of
Hiland Holdings during regular business hours by any interested
unitholder of Hiland Holdings or such unitholders
representative who has been so designated in writing. The
opinion of Jefferies & Company and the presentation
Jefferies & Company made to the Hiland Partners
Conflicts Committee will be made available for inspection and
copying at the principal executive offices of Hiland Partners
during regular business hours by any interested unitholder of
Hiland Partners or such unitholders representative who has
been so designated in writing. The presentations of Wachovia
Securities will be made available for inspection and copying at
the principal executive offices of Hiland Partners and Hiland
Holdings during regular business hours by any interested
unitholder of Hiland Partners or Hiland Holdings, respectively,
or such unitholders representative who has been so
designated in writing.
The information concerning each Hiland Company contained or
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement has been
provided by the applicable Hiland Company, and the information
concerning Parent, HLND Merger Sub, HPGP Merger Sub and the Hamm
Continuing Investors contained in this joint proxy statement has
been provided by Parent and the Hamm Continuing Investors.
This joint proxy statement does not constitute an offer to sell,
or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the
solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any
person to whom it is not lawful to make any offer or
solicitation in that jurisdiction. The delivery of this joint
proxy statement should not create an implication that there has
been no change in the affairs of Hiland Partners or Hiland
Holdings since the date of this joint proxy statement or that
the information herein is correct as of any later date
regardless of the time of delivery of this joint proxy statement.
The provisions of the merger agreements are extensive and not
easily summarized. You should carefully read the Hiland Partners
merger agreement or the Hiland Holdings merger agreement in its
entirety because it, and not this joint proxy statement, is the
legal document that governs the merger of the Hiland Company in
which you own units. In addition, you should read Special
Factors Structure and Steps of the Mergers,
beginning on page 122.
The merger agreements contain representations and warranties by
each of the parties to such merger agreement. These
representations and warranties have been made solely for the
benefit of the other parties to such merger agreement and:
|
|
|
|
|
may be intended not as statements of fact, but rather as a way
of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements
prove to be inaccurate;
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other
party in connection with the negotiation of the merger, which
disclosures are not reflected in the associated merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different
from what may be viewed as material to you or other
investors; and
|
|
|
|
were made only as of the date of the merger agreements or such
other date or dates as may be specified in the merger agreements
and are subject to more recent developments.
|
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not
describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were
made or at any other time.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement to vote
your common units at the applicable special meeting. Neither
Hiland Company has authorized anyone to provide you with
information that is different from what is contained in this
joint proxy statement. This joint proxy statement is
dated ,
2009. You should not assume that the information contained in
this joint proxy statement is accurate as of any date other than
that date, or that the information contained in any document
incorporated by reference is accurate as of any date other than
the date of the document incorporated by reference. Neither the
mailing of the joint proxy statement to unitholders nor the
issuance of the applicable merger consideration pursuant to the
merger shall create any implication to the contrary.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of Hiland Partners
incorporated in this joint proxy statement by reference to its
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, have been audited by
Grant Thornton, LLP, independent registered public accountants,
as stated in their reports with respect thereto.
The consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of Hiland Holdings
incorporated in this joint proxy statement by reference to its
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, have been audited by
Grant Thornton, LLP, independent registered public accountants,
as stated in their reports with respect thereto.
193
Annex A
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
among
HH GP HOLDING, LLC,
HLND MERGERCO, LLC,
HILAND PARTNERS GP, LLC
and
HILAND PARTNERS, LP
Executed June 1, 2009
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE I THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.1
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.3
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.4
|
|
Effects of the Merger
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.5
|
|
Partnership Agreement of the Surviving Entity
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.6
|
|
Admission of Additional Limited Partners
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
ARTICLE II CONVERSION OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS; EXCHANGE OF
CERTIFICATES
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 2.1
|
|
Effect on Partnership Interests
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 2.2
|
|
Exchange of Certificates
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
Section 2.3
|
|
Timing for Rollover Interests
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE HILAND
PARTIES
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
Qualification, Organization, Subsidiaries, Etc.
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
Section 3.2
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Section 3.3
|
|
Authority; No Violation; Consents and Approvals
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
Section 3.4
|
|
SEC Reports and Compliance
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section 3.5
|
|
No Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section 3.6
|
|
Compliance with Law
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section 3.7
|
|
Environmental Laws and Regulations
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section 3.8
|
|
Employee Benefits
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section 3.9
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section 3.10
|
|
Investigations; Litigation
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Section 3.11
|
|
Proxy Statement; Other Information
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Section 3.12
|
|
Tax Matters
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Section 3.13
|
|
Labor Matters
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Section 3.14
|
|
Title to Properties and Rights-of-Way
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Section 3.15
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Section 3.16
|
|
Required Approvals
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Section 3.17
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Section 3.18
|
|
State Takeover Laws
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 3.19
|
|
Finders or Brokers
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 3.20
|
|
No Other Representations or Warranties
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE PARENT
PARTIES
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
Qualification; Organization
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 4.2
|
|
Authority; No Violation; Consents and Approvals
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Section 4.3
|
|
Proxy Statement; Other Information
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Section 4.4
|
|
Funding
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Section 4.5
|
|
Ownership and Operations of Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Section 4.6
|
|
Finders or Brokers
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Section 4.7
|
|
Access to Information; No Other Representations or
Warranties; Disclaimer
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE V COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Section 5.1
|
|
Conduct of Business by the Partnership and Parent
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Section 5.2
|
|
Investigation
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Section 5.3
|
|
No Solicitation
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Section 5.4
|
|
Filings; Other Actions
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Section 5.5
|
|
Equity Awards
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Section 5.6
|
|
Efforts
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Section 5.7
|
|
Takeover Statute
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Section 5.8
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Section 5.9
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
Section 5.10
|
|
Unitholder Litigation
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
Section 5.11
|
|
Notification of Certain Matters
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
Section 5.12
|
|
Rule 16b-3
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
ARTICLE VI CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Section 6.1
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the
Merger
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Section 6.2
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of the Hiland Parties to Effect
the Merger
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Section 6.3
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of the Parent Parties to Effect
the Merger
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section 6.4
|
|
Frustration of Conditions
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
ARTICLE VII TERMINATION
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 7.1
|
|
Termination or Abandonment
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 7.2
|
|
Reimbursement of Certain Expenses
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 8.1
|
|
No Survival of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 8.2
|
|
Holdings Merger
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 8.3
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 8.4
|
|
Counterparts; Effectiveness
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section 8.5
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section 8.6
|
|
Specific Performance; Jurisdiction; Enforcement
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section 8.7
|
|
WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section 8.8
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section 8.9
|
|
Assignment; Binding Effect
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section 8.10
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Section 8.11
|
|
Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Section 8.12
|
|
Amendments; Waivers
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Section 8.13
|
|
Headings; Interpretation
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Section 8.14
|
|
No Recourse
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section 8.15
|
|
Certain Definitions
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Exhibit A Form of Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
A-ii
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, executed this 1st day of
June, 2009 (this Agreement), is entered into
among HH GP Holding, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company
(Parent), HLND MergerCo, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and a subsidiary of Parent
(Merger Sub and, together with Parent, the
Parent Parties), Hiland Partners GP, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and the general partner of
the Partnership (Partnership GP), and Hiland
Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the
Partnership and, together with Partnership
GP, the Hiland Parties).
W I T N E
S S E T
H
:
WHEREAS, the parties intend that Merger Sub be merged with and
into the Partnership, with the Partnership surviving that merger
on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement (the Merger);
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that, on the Closing Date (as
defined herein), HPGP MergerCo, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company and a subsidiary of Parent (HPGP
Merger Sub), be merged with and into Hiland Holdings
GP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
(Holdings), with Holdings surviving that
merger (the Holdings Merger) on the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of the date hereof (the Holdings
Agreement), among Parent, HPGP Merger Sub, Hiland
Partners GP Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
and the general partner of Holdings (Holdings
GP), and Holdings;
WHEREAS, the board of directors of Partnership GP (the
Board of Directors), acting upon the
unanimous recommendation of its Conflicts Committee, has
(i) determined that this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby are advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of the Partnership and the holders of Common Units
(other than Partnership GP and its Affiliates (including
Holdings)), (ii) approved the execution, delivery and
performance of this Agreement by the Hiland Parties and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including
the Merger, and (iii) resolved to recommend approval of
this Agreement and the Merger by the holders of Common Units
(excluding Common Units owned by Partnership GP and its
Affiliates (including Holdings)) of the Partnership;
WHEREAS, Holdings GP and Holdings are parties to a Support
Agreement, dated the date hereof (the Support
Agreement), with Parent and the Hiland Parties
pursuant to which Holdings GP and Holdings have, among other
things: (i) agreed that the Partnership Interests of which
Holdings is the record and beneficial owner will not be
converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration and
will remain outstanding as Partnership Interests of the
Surviving Entity (as defined herein) in the Merger, and
(ii) agreed to vote the Common Units and Subordinated Units
of which Holdings is the record and beneficial owner in favor of
the approval of this Agreement and the Merger;
WHEREAS, the board of directors of each of Parent and Merger Sub
and the sole member of Merger Sub have unanimously approved this
Agreement and declared it advisable for Parent and Merger Sub,
respectively, to enter into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to make certain representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with the
Merger and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
also to prescribe certain conditions to the Merger as specified
herein.
A-1
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained
herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Parent, Merger
Sub, Partnership GP and the Partnership hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
The Merger
Section 1.1 The
Merger. At the Effective Time, upon the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement and in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the Delaware
Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act
(DRULPA) and the Delaware Limited Liability
Company Act (DLLCA), Merger Sub shall be
merged with and into the Partnership, whereupon the separate
existence of Merger Sub shall cease, and the Partnership shall
continue as the surviving entity in the Merger (the
Surviving Entity).
Section 1.2 Closing. The
closing of the Merger (the Closing) shall
take place at the offices of Baker Botts L.L.P. at 910 Louisiana
Street, Houston, Texas at 10:00 a.m., local time, on a date
to be specified by the parties (the Closing
Date) which shall be no later than the third Business
Day after the satisfaction or waiver (to the extent permitted by
applicable Law) of the conditions set forth in Article VI
(other than those conditions that by their nature are to be
satisfied at the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of such conditions), or at such other place, date and
time as the Partnership and Parent may agree in writing.
Section 1.3 Effective
Time. At the Closing, the Partnership shall
cause the Merger to be consummated by executing and filing a
certificate of merger (the Certificate of
Merger) with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware in accordance with
Section 17-211
of the DRULPA and
Section 18-209
of the DLLCA. The Merger shall become effective at such time as
the Certificate of Merger is duly filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware, or at such later date or time as
may be agreed by Parent and the Partnership in writing and
specified in the Certificate of Merger in accordance with the
DRULPA and the DLLCA (such time as the Merger becomes effective
is referred to herein as the Effective Time).
Section 1.4 Effects
of the Merger. The Merger shall have the
effects set forth in this Agreement, the Partnership Agreement
and the applicable provisions of the DRULPA and DLLCA.
Section 1.5 Partnership
Agreement of the Surviving Entity. The
Partnership Agreement, as in effect immediately prior to the
Effective Time, shall remain the partnership agreement of the
Surviving Entity and shall continue in effect until thereafter
changed or amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and
applicable Law.
Section 1.6 Admission
of Additional Limited Partners. Upon the
conversion of the limited liability company interests in Merger
Sub (Merger Sub LLC Interests), which are
denominated in units (Merger Sub LLC Units),
into Common Units pursuant to Section 2.1(c) and the
recording of the name of the holder thereof as a limited partner
of the Partnership on the books and records of the Partnership,
such Person shall automatically and effective as of the
Effective Time be admitted to the Partnership as an additional
Limited Partner and be bound by the Partnership Agreement as
such.
ARTICLE II
Conversion
of Partnership Interests; Exchange of Certificates
Section 2.1 Effect
on Partnership Interests. At the Effective
Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part
of the Partnership, Merger Sub or the holders of any securities
of the Partnership or Merger Sub:
(a) Conversion of Common
Units. Subject to Sections 2.1(b) and
2.1(d), each Common Unit issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time, other than any Common Units
included among the Rollover Interests, shall thereupon be
converted automatically into and shall thereafter represent the
right to receive $7.75 in cash without any interest thereon (the
Merger Consideration). Immediately prior to
the Effective Time, each award of Restricted Units (as defined
in the Hiland Partners, LP Long-
A-2
Term Incentive Plan (the Hiland LTIP)) issued
and outstanding to any nonemployee member of the Board of
Directors shall become fully vested as Common Units and shall
thereupon be converted automatically into and shall thereafter
represent the right to receive the Merger Consideration. All
Common Units that have been converted into the right to receive
the Merger Consideration as provided in this Section 2.1
shall be automatically cancelled and shall cease to exist, and
the holders of such Common Units immediately prior to the
Effective Time (whether certificated or non-certificated and
represented in book-entry form) shall cease to have any rights
with respect to such Common Units other than the right to
receive the Merger Consideration.
(b) Rollover of Certain Partnership
Interests. The following Partnership
Interests shall be treated in the Merger as follows:
(i) each of the 2,321,471 Common Units owned by Holdings
shall be unchanged and remain outstanding as Common Units of the
Surviving Entity, and no consideration shall be delivered in
respect thereof;
(ii) each of the 3,060,000 Subordinated Units owned by
Holdings shall be unchanged and remain outstanding as
Subordinated Units of the Surviving Entity, and no consideration
shall be delivered in respect thereof;
(iii) the General Partner Interest, which is represented by
190,814 General Partner Units and is owned by Partnership GP,
shall be unchanged and remain outstanding as the General Partner
Interest of the Surviving Entity, and no consideration shall be
delivered in respect thereof; and
(iv) the Incentive Distribution Rights, which are owned by
Partnership GP, shall be unchanged and remain outstanding as
Incentive Distribution Rights of the Surviving Entity, and no
consideration shall be delivered in respect thereof.
The Partnership Interests described in this Section 2.1(b)
are referred to in this Agreement as Rollover
Interests, and the record and beneficial owners of
such Rollover Interests are referred to in this Agreement as the
Rollover Parties.
(c) Conversion of Merger Sub Limited Liability
Company Interests. At the Effective Time, by
virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the
holder thereof, each Merger Sub LLC Unit issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into
and become one Common Unit of the Surviving Entity, which Common
Units shall be duly authorized and validly issued in accordance
with applicable Laws and the Partnership Agreement and shall be
fully paid (to the extent required by the Partnership Agreement)
and nonassessable (except to the extent such nonassessability
may be affected by
Sections 17-607
and 17-804
of DRULPA). Immediately after the Effective Time, such Common
Units and the Rollover Interests will constitute the only
outstanding Partnership Interests of the Surviving Entity. From
and after the Effective Time, any certificates or other evidence
representing the Merger Sub LLC Units shall be deemed for all
purposes to represent the number of Common Units of the
Surviving Entity into which such Merger Sub LLC Units were
converted in accordance with this Section 2.1(c).
Partnership GP hereby agrees and acknowledges that conversion of
the Merger Sub LLC Units to Common Units of the Surviving Entity
as provided herein shall constitute a duly authorized, accepted,
executed and countersigned delivery of such Common Units,
without any further action by Partnership GP or any other person.
(d) Adjustments. If between the
date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, the outstanding
Common Units, including securities convertible or exchangeable
into or exercisable for Common Units, shall be changed into a
different number of units or other securities by reason of any
split, combination, merger, consolidation, reorganization,
reclassification, recapitalization or other similar transaction,
or any distribution payable in Partnership Interests shall be
declared thereon with a record date within such period, the
Merger Consideration shall be appropriately adjusted to provide
the holders of Common Units the same economic effect as
contemplated by this Agreement prior to such event;
provided that nothing herein shall be construed to permit
the Partnership to take any action with respect to its
securities that is expressly prohibited by the terms of this
Agreement.
A-3
Section 2.2 Exchange
of Certificates.
(a) Paying Agent. Prior to the
mailing of the Proxy Statement (as defined herein), Parent shall
appoint a U.S. bank or trust company agreeable to the
Conflicts Committee to act as paying agent (the Paying
Agent) for the holders of Common Units (other than the
Rollover Parties) in connection with the Merger and to receive
and pay out the Merger Consideration to which such holders shall
become entitled pursuant to Section 2.1. At or prior to the
Effective Time, the Parent Parties shall deposit, or shall cause
to be deposited, in trust with the Paying Agent, for the benefit
of holders of Common Units (other than the Rollover Parties),
cash in an amount sufficient to pay the aggregate Merger
Consideration in exchange for all Common Units outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Common Units
included among the Rollover Interests), payable upon due
surrender of the certificates that immediately prior to the
Effective Time represented Common Units
(Certificates) (or effective affidavits of
loss in lieu thereof) or non-certificated Common Units
represented in book-entry form (Book-Entry Common
Units) pursuant to the provisions of this
Article II (such cash hereinafter referred to as the
Exchange Fund).
(b) Payment Procedures.
(i) As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective
Time and in any event not later than the fifth Business Day
following the Effective Time, Parent shall cause the Paying
Agent to mail to each holder of record of Common Units whose
Common Units were converted into the Merger Consideration
pursuant to Section 2.1(a), (A) a letter of
transmittal (the Letter of Transmittal)
(which shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk
of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon
proper delivery of the Certificates (or effective affidavits of
loss in lieu thereof) to the Paying Agent or, in the case of
Book-Entry Common Units, upon adherence to the procedures set
forth in the Letter of Transmittal, and shall be in such
customary form and have such other provisions as Parent and the
Hiland Parties shall reasonably determine) and
(B) instructions for use of the Letter of Transmittal in
effecting the surrender of the Certificates (or effective
affidavits of loss in lieu thereof) or Book-Entry Common Units
in exchange for the Merger Consideration.
(ii) Upon surrender of a Certificate (or an effective
affidavit of loss in lieu thereof) or Book-Entry Common Units to
the Paying Agent together with such Letter of Transmittal, duly
completed and validly executed in accordance with the
instructions thereto, and such other documents as may
customarily be required by the Paying Agent, the holder of such
Certificate or Book-Entry Common Units shall be entitled to
receive in exchange therefor a check in an amount equal to the
product of (x) the number of Common Units represented by
such holders properly surrendered Certificates (or
effective affidavits of loss in lieu thereof) or Book-Entry
Common Units multiplied by (y) the Merger Consideration. No
interest shall be paid or accrued for the benefit of holders of
the Certificates or Book-Entry Common Units on the Merger
Consideration payable in respect of the Certificates or
Book-Entry Common Units. In the event of a transfer of ownership
of Common Units that is not registered in the unit transfer
register of the Partnership, a check for any cash to be paid
upon due surrender of the Certificate may be paid to such a
transferee if the Certificate formerly representing such Common
Units is presented to the Paying Agent, accompanied by all
documents required to evidence and effect such transfer and to
evidence that any applicable unit transfer or other Taxes have
been paid or are not applicable.
(iii) Parent, the Surviving Entity and the Paying Agent
shall be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration
otherwise payable under this Agreement to any holder of Common
Units such amounts as are required to be withheld or deducted
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), or any provision of federal, state,
local or foreign Tax Law with respect to the making of such
payment. To the extent that amounts are so withheld or deducted
and paid over to the applicable Governmental Entity, such
withheld or deducted amounts shall be treated for all purposes
of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder of Common
Units in respect of which such deduction and withholding were
made.
(c) Closing of Transfer
Register. At the Effective Time, the unit
transfer register of the Partnership shall be closed, and there
shall be no further registration of transfers on the unit
transfer register of the Surviving Entity of Common Units (other
than the Rollover Interests) that were outstanding immediately
prior to the
A-4
Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, Certificates or
Book-Entry Common Units provided for in Section 2.1(a) are
presented to the Surviving Entity or Parent for transfer, they
shall be cancelled and exchanged for a check in the proper
amount pursuant to and subject to the requirements of this
Article II.
(d) Termination of Exchange
Fund. Any portion of the Exchange Fund
(including the proceeds of any investments thereof) that remains
undistributed to the former holders of Common Units for twelve
months after the Effective Time shall be delivered to the
Surviving Entity upon demand, and any former holders of Common
Units who have not surrendered their Certificates or Book-Entry
Common Units provided for in Section 2.1(a) in accordance
with this Section 2.2 shall thereafter look only to the
Surviving Entity for payment of their claim for the Merger
Consideration, without any interest thereon, upon due surrender
of their Certificates or Book-Entry Common Units.
(e) No Liability. Notwithstanding
anything herein to the contrary, none of Parent, Merger Sub, the
Partnership, Partnership GP, the Surviving Entity, the Paying
Agent or any other person shall be liable to any former holder
of Common Units for any amount properly delivered to a public
official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat
or similar Law.
(f) Investment of Exchange
Fund. The Paying Agent shall invest the
Exchange Fund as reasonably directed by Parent; provided,
however, that any investment of such Exchange Fund shall
be limited to direct short-term obligations of, or short-term
obligations fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by,
the U.S. government and that no such investment or loss
thereon shall affect the amounts payable to holders of Common
Units that converted into the right to receive the Merger
Consideration pursuant to Section 2.1. Any interest and
other income resulting from such investments shall be paid to
the Surviving Entity pursuant to Section 2.2(d).
(g) Lost Certificates. In the
event that any Certificate representing Common Units provided
for in Section 2.1(a) shall have been lost, stolen or
destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the
person claiming such Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed
and, if required by Parent or the Paying Agent, the posting by
such person of a bond in customary amount as indemnity against
any claim that may be made against it with respect to such
Certificate, the Paying Agent will issue in exchange for such
lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate a check in the amount of
the number of Common Units represented by such lost, stolen or
destroyed Certificate multiplied by the Merger Consideration.
Section 2.3 Timing
for Rollover Interests. For the avoidance of
doubt, the parties acknowledge and agree that the Rollover
Commitments shall be deemed to become effective and irrevocable
immediately prior to the Effective Time and prior to any other
event described above in this Article II.
ARTICLE III
Representations
and Warranties of the Hiland Parties
Except as disclosed (a) in (i) the Hiland SEC
Documents (as defined herein) or (ii) the Holdings SEC
Documents (as defined in the Holdings Agreement), in each case
filed on or after December 31, 2008 and prior to the date
of this Agreement (excluding any disclosures included in any
risk factor section of such documents and any other disclosures
in such documents to the extent that they are cautionary,
predictive or forward-looking in nature) or (b) in a
section of the disclosure schedule delivered concurrently
herewith by the Hiland Parties to Parent (the Hiland
Disclosure Schedule) corresponding to the applicable
sections of this Article III to which such disclosure
applies (provided, however, that any information
set forth in one section of such Hiland Disclosure Schedule also
shall be deemed to apply to each other section of this Agreement
to which its relevance is reasonably apparent), the Hiland
Parties hereby represent and warrant, jointly and severally, to
the Parent Parties as follows:
Section 3.1 Qualification,
Organization, Subsidiaries, Etc.
(a) Section 3.1(a) of the Hiland Disclosure Schedule
sets forth, as of the date hereof, a true and complete list of
the Hiland Parties and each direct or indirect Subsidiary and
Partially Owned Entity of the Partnership (collectively, the
Hiland Group Entities), together with
(i) the nature of the legal organization of such
A-5
person, (ii) the jurisdiction of organization or formation
of such person, (iii) the name of each Hiland Group Entity
that owns beneficially or of record any equity or similar
interest in such person, and (iv) the percentage interest
owned by each such Hiland Group Entity in such other persons.
(b) Each Hiland Group Entity is a legal entity validly
existing and in good standing under the Laws of its respective
jurisdiction of formation. Each Hiland Group Entity has all
requisite limited partnership, limited liability company or
corporate, as the case may be, power and authority to own, lease
and operate its properties and assets and to carry on its
business as presently conducted in all material respects.
(c) Each Hiland Group Entity is duly registered or
qualified to do business and is in good standing as a foreign
limited partnership, limited liability company or corporation,
as the case may be, in each jurisdiction where the ownership,
leasing or operation of its assets or properties or the conduct
of its business requires such registration or qualification,
except where the failure to be so registered, qualified or in
good standing would not, individually or in the aggregate, have
a Hiland Material Adverse Effect. The organizational or
governing documents of the Hiland Group Entities, as previously
made available to Parent, are in full force and effect. None of
the Hiland Group Entities is in violation of its organizational
or governing documents.
Section 3.2 Capitalization.
(a) Partnership GP is the sole general partner of the
Partnership. Partnership GP is the record and beneficial owner
of the 2% General Partner Interest and all of the Incentive
Distribution Rights in the Partnership, and such General Partner
Interest and Incentive Distribution Rights have been duly
authorized and validly issued in accordance with applicable Laws
and the Partnership Agreement and such Incentive Distribution
Rights are fully paid (to the extent required by the Partnership
Agreement) and nonassessable (to the extent such
nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 17-607
and 17-804
of DRULPA). Partnership GP owns all of the General Partner
Interest and all of the Incentive Distribution Rights free and
clear of any Encumbrances except pursuant to the organizational
or governing documents of any of the Hiland Group Entities.
Holdings is the record owner of 99.999% of the limited liability
company interests in Partnership GP. Hiland Partners GP, Inc. is
the record owner of 0.001% of the limited liability company
interests of Partnership GP. Such limited liability company
interests in Partnership GP have been duly authorized and
validly issued in accordance with applicable Laws and the
limited liability company agreement of Partnership GP and are
fully paid (to the extent required by the limited liability
company agreement of Partnership GP) and nonassessable (except
to the extent such nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 18-607
and 18-804
of DLLCA).
(b) As of the date of this Agreement (the
Execution Date), the Partnership has no
Partnership Interests issued and outstanding other than the
following:
(i) 6,289,880 Common Units, of which 2,321,471 are owned of
record by Holdings;
(ii) 3,060,000 Subordinated Units, all of which are owned
of record by Holdings;
(iii) 190,814 General Partner Units, comprising all of the
General Partner Interest, all of which are owned beneficially
and of record by Partnership GP; and
(iv) the Incentive Distribution Rights, all of which are
owned beneficially and of record by Partnership GP.
Each of such limited partner interests described in clauses (i),
(ii) and (iv) above has been duly authorized and
validly issued in accordance with applicable Laws and the
Partnership Agreement, and is fully paid (to the extent required
under the Partnership Agreement) and non-assessable (except to
the extent such nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 17-607
and 17-804
of DRULPA). Such limited partner interests were not issued in
violation of any preemptive or similar rights or any other
agreement or understanding binding on the Partnership. As of the
date of this Agreement, except for outstanding awards for the
issuance of 15,750 Restricted Units pursuant to the Hiland LTIP,
47,169 phantom units that may be settled in Common Units, and
33,336 options for the purchase of Common Units and except
pursuant to the organizational or governing documents of any of
the Hiland Group Entities, (A) there are no outstanding
options, warrants, subscriptions, puts, calls or other rights,
agreements, arrangements or commitments (preemptive, contingent
or otherwise) obligating any of the Hiland Group Entities to
offer, issue, sell, redeem, repurchase, otherwise acquire or
A-6
transfer, pledge or encumber any equity interest in any of the
Hiland Group Entities; (B) there are no outstanding
securities or obligations of any kind of any of the Hiland Group
Entities that are convertible into or exercisable or
exchangeable for any equity interest in any of the Hiland Group
Entities or any other person, and none of the Hiland Group
Entities has any obligation of any kind to issue any additional
securities or to pay for or repurchase any securities;
(C) there are not outstanding any equity appreciation
rights, phantom equity or similar rights, agreements,
arrangements or commitments based on the value of the equity,
book value, income or any other attribute of any of the Hiland
Group Entities; (D) there are no outstanding bonds,
debentures or other evidences of indebtedness of any of the
Hiland Group Entities having the right to vote (or that are
exchangeable for or convertible or exercisable into securities
having the right to vote) with the holders of Common Units on
any matter; and (E) except as described in the
organizational or governing documents of the Hiland Parties or
the Support Agreement, there are no Unitholder agreements,
proxies, voting trusts, rights to require registration under
securities Laws or other arrangements or commitments to which
any of the Hiland Group Entities is a party or to the knowledge
of the Hiland Group Entities by which any of their securities
are bound with respect to the voting, disposition or
registration of any outstanding securities of any of the Hiland
Group Entities.
(c) All of the outstanding limited liability company,
partnership or other equity interests of each Subsidiary of the
Partnership (i) have been duly authorized and validly
issued in accordance with applicable Laws and its governing
documents and are fully paid (to the extent required by its
governing documents) and nonassessable (except to the extent
such nonassessability may be affected by applicable Laws,
including
Sections 17-607
and 17-804
of DRULPA) and (ii) are owned 100% directly or indirectly
by the Partnership, free and clear of any Encumbrance except
pursuant to the organizational or governing documents of any of
the Hiland Group Entities and other than Encumbrances securing
the obligations of Hiland Operating, LLC under the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement.
(d) All of the outstanding equity interests of each
Partially Owned Entity of the Partnership (i) have been
duly authorized and validly issued in accordance with applicable
Laws and its governing documents and are fully paid (to the
extent required by its organizational or governing documents)
and nonassessable (except to the extent such nonassessability
may be affected by applicable Laws), and (ii) are owned
directly or indirectly by the Partnership in the respective
amounts shown on Section 3.1(a) of the Hiland Disclosure
Schedule, free and clear of any Encumbrance except pursuant to
the organizational or governing documents of any of the Hiland
Group Entities.
(e) Except with respect to the ownership of any equity or
long-term debt securities between or among the Hiland Group
Entities, none of the Hiland Group Entities owns or will own at
the Closing Date, directly or indirectly, any equity or
long-term debt securities of any corporation, partnership,
limited liability company, joint venture, association or other
entity.
(f) Except as provided in the Partnership Agreement, no
holder of Partnership Interests in any of the Hiland Parties has
any right to have such Partnership Interests registered under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), by the Partnership.
Section 3.3 Authority;
No Violation; Consents and Approvals.
(a) Each of the Hiland Parties has all requisite limited
liability company or limited partnership power and authority to
enter into this Agreement, to carry out its obligations
hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby. The execution, delivery and performance by each Hiland
Party of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all requisite
limited liability company or limited partnership action on the
part of such Hiland Party, except for (i) Unitholder
Approval of this Agreement and the Merger and (ii) the
filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State
of the State of Delaware; and no other vote or approval by any
holders of Partnership Interests or limited liability company
interests in Partnership GP or other corporate, limited
liability company, partnership or other organizational votes,
approvals or proceedings in respect of the Hiland Parties are
necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
A-7
(b) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
each Hiland Party and, assuming the due authorization, execution
and delivery hereof by the Parent Parties, constitutes a legal,
valid and binding agreement of such Hiland Party, enforceable
against such Hiland Party in accordance with its terms (except
insofar as such enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy,
insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and
similar laws relating to or affecting creditors rights
generally and by general principles of equity (regardless of
whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in
equity or at law)).
(c) Except for matters expressly contemplated by this
Agreement and matters described in clauses (ii), (iii) or
(iv) below that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Hiland Material Adverse Effect, neither the
execution and delivery by the Hiland Parties of this Agreement,
nor the consummation by the Hiland Parties of the transactions
contemplated hereby and the performance by the Hiland Parties of
this Agreement will (i) violate or conflict with any
provision of the organizational or governing documents of the
Hiland Group Entities; (ii) require any consent, approval,
authorization or permit of, registration, declaration or filing
with, or notification to, any Governmental Entity or any other
person; (iii) result in any breach of or constitute a
default (or an event that, with notice or lapse of time or both,
would become a default) under, or give to others any right of
termination, cancellation, amendment or acceleration of any
obligation or the loss of any benefit under any agreement or
instrument to which any of the Hiland Group Entities is a party
or by or to which any of their properties are bound;
(iv) result in the creation of an Encumbrance upon any of
the assets of any of the Hiland Group Entities; or
(v) violate or conflict in any material respect with any
material Law applicable to the Hiland Group Entities.
(d) Section 3.3(d) of the Hiland Disclosure Schedule
identifies all consents, approvals and authorizations of any
Governmental Entity or third party that are required to be
obtained by any Hiland Group Entity in connection with
(1) the execution and delivery by the Hiland Parties of
this Agreement or (2) the consummation by the Hiland
Parties of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, in
each case except for such consents, approvals and authorizations
that, if not obtained, would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Hiland Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.4 SEC
Reports and Compliance.
(a) The Partnership and its Subsidiaries have filed or
furnished all forms, documents, statements and reports required
to be filed or furnished prior to the date hereof by them with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) since January 1, 2006 (the forms,
documents, statements and reports filed with or furnished to the
SEC since January 1, 2006 and those filed or furnished with
the SEC subsequent to the date of this Agreement, if any,
including any amendments thereto, the Hiland SEC
Documents). As of their respective dates, or, if
amended, as of the date of the last such amendment prior to the
date hereof, the Hiland SEC Documents complied, and each of the
Hiland SEC Documents filed or furnished subsequent to the date
of this Agreement will comply, in all material respects with the
requirements of the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act),
as the case may be, and the applicable rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder, and complied or will comply, as
applicable, in all material respects with the then-applicable
accounting standards and the rules and regulations of the SEC
with respect thereto. None of the Hiland SEC Documents so filed
or furnished or that will be filed or furnished subsequent to
the date of this Agreement contained or will contain, as the
case may be, any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted
or will omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(b) As of the date hereof, there are no outstanding
comments from, or unresolved issues raised by, the SEC with
respect to the Hiland SEC Documents.
(c) The financial statements (including all related notes
and schedules) of the Partnership and its Subsidiaries included
in or incorporated by reference into the Hiland SEC Documents
(the Hiland Financial Statements) fairly
present, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Partnership and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as at the
respective dates thereof, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for the respective periods then ended
(subject, in the case of the unaudited statements, to normal
year-end audit adjustments and to any other adjustments
described therein, including the notes thereto) in conformity
with United States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) (except, in the case of the
A-8
unaudited statements, as permitted by the SEC) applied on a
consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may be
specified therein or in the notes thereto).
Section 3.5 No
Undisclosed Liabilities. Neither the
Partnership nor any of the Partnerships Subsidiaries has
any indebtedness or liability (whether absolute, accrued,
contingent or otherwise) of any nature that is not accrued or
reserved against in the Hiland Financial Statements filed prior
to the execution of this Agreement or reflected in the notes
thereto, other than (a) liabilities incurred or accrued in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
since December 31, 2008 or (b) liabilities of the
Partnership or any of the Partnerships Subsidiaries that
would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Hiland
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.6 Compliance
with Law. Each of the Hiland Group Entities
is in compliance with all applicable Laws, other than any
noncompliance which would not, individually or in the aggregate,
have a Hiland Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.7 Environmental
Laws and Regulations. Except as reflected in
the Hiland Financial Statements, and except for any such matter
that individually would not have a Hiland Material Adverse
Effect:
(a) None of the Hiland Group Entities is the subject of any
outstanding written agreements (including consent orders and
settlement agreements) with any Governmental Entity or other
Person imposing liability with respect to any environmental
matter;
(b) None of the Hiland Group Entities has received any
written communication from any Governmental Entity or other
Person alleging, with respect to any such party, the violation
of or liability under any Environmental Law or requesting, with
respect to any such party, information with respect to an
investigation pursuant to any Environmental Law; and
(c) There has been no Release of any Hazardous Material
from or in connection with the properties or operations of the
Hiland Group Entities that has not been adequately reserved for
in the Hiland Financial Statements and that has resulted or
could reasonably be expected to result in liability under
Environmental Laws or a claim for damages or compensation by any
Person or Remedial Work.
Section 3.8 Employee
Benefits.
(a) Except as would not have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Hiland Material Adverse Effect, no Hiland Group
Entity and no company or other entity that is required to be
treated as a single employer together with a Hiland Group Entity
under Section 414 of the Code (each, an ERISA
Affiliate) maintains or has ever maintained or been
obligated to contribute to or has any liability (secondary or
otherwise) to an Employee Benefit Plan that is (1) subject
to Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, as amended (ERISA), or the minimum
funding requirements of Section 412 of the Code or
Section 302 of ERISA, (2) a plan of the type described
in Section 4063 of ERISA or Section 413(c) of the
Code, (3) a multiemployer plan (as defined in
Section 3(37) of ERISA) or (4) a multiple employer
welfare arrangement (as defined in Section 3(40) of ERISA).
(b) Except as would not have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Hiland Material Adverse Effect, the Employee
Benefit Plans of the Hiland Group Entities and their affiliates
(A) have been maintained (in form and in operation) in all
respects in accordance with their terms and with ERISA, the Code
and all other applicable Laws, (B) if intended to be
qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code, have been
maintained, and are currently, in compliance with the
Codes qualification requirements in form and operation,
and (C) do not provide, and have not provided, any
post-retirement welfare benefits or coverage, except as required
under Part 6 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA and
Section 4980B of the Code (or similar state or local law).
Section 3.9 Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. Since
December 31, 2008, (a) except as otherwise required or
expressly provided for in this Agreement, (i) the
businesses of the Hiland Group Entities have been conducted, in
all material respects, in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice and (ii) none of the Hiland
Group Entities has taken or permitted to occur any action that,
were it to be taken from and after the date hereof, would
require approval of Parent pursuant to Section 5.1(b) and
(b) there has not been a Hiland Material Adverse Effect.
A-9
Section 3.10 Investigations;
Litigation. Except as disclosed in
Section 3.10 of the Hiland Disclosure Schedule, there are
no (a) investigations or proceedings pending (or, to the
Knowledge of the Hiland Parties, threatened) by any Governmental
Entity with respect to the Partnership or any of its
Subsidiaries or (b) actions, suits, inquiries,
investigations or proceedings pending (or, to the Knowledge of
the Hiland Parties, threatened) against or affecting any Hiland
Group Entity, or any of their respective properties at law or in
equity before, and there are no orders, judgments or decrees of,
or before, any Governmental Entity, in each case of
clause (a) or (b), which would have (if adversely
determined), individually or in the aggregate, a Hiland Material
Adverse Effect.
Section 3.11 Proxy
Statement; Other Information. None of the
information contained in the Proxy Statement will at the time of
the mailing of the Proxy Statement to the Unitholders of the
Partnership, at the time of the Partnership Meeting (as defined
herein) (as such Proxy Statement shall have been amended or
supplemented prior to the date of the Partnership Meeting), and
at the time of any amendments thereof or supplements thereto,
and none of the information supplied or to be supplied by the
Partnership for inclusion or incorporation by reference in the
Schedule 13E-3
(as defined herein) to be filed with the SEC concurrently with
the filing of the Proxy Statement, will, at the time of its
filing with the SEC, and at the time of any amendments thereof
or supplements thereto, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading; provided that no representation is
made by the Partnership with respect to information supplied by
a Parent Party or its controlling Affiliates or a Holdings Party
for inclusion therein. The Proxy Statement will comply as to
form in all material respects with the Exchange Act, except that
no representation is made by the Partnership with respect to
information supplied by a Parent Party or its controlling
Affiliates or a Holdings Party for inclusion therein. The letter
to Unitholders, notice of meeting, proxy statement and forms of
proxy to be distributed to Unitholders in connection with the
Merger to be filed with the SEC in connection with seeking the
adoption and approval of this Agreement and the Merger are
collectively referred to herein as the Proxy
Statement. The
Rule 13E-3
Transaction Statement on
Schedule 13E-3
to be filed with the SEC in connection with seeking the adoption
and approval of this Agreement and the Merger is referred to
herein as the
Schedule 13E-3.
Section 3.12 Tax
Matters.
(a) (i) There is no action, suit, proceeding,
investigation, audit or claim now pending against, or with
respect to, any of the Hiland Group Entities in respect of any
material Tax or material Tax assessment, nor has any claim for
additional material Tax or material Tax assessment been asserted
in writing or been proposed by any Tax authority;
(ii) no written claim has been made by any Tax authority in
a jurisdiction where any of the Hiland Group Entities does not
currently file a Tax Return that it is or may be subject to any
material Tax in such jurisdiction, nor has any such assertion
been threatened or proposed in writing;
(iii) none of the Hiland Group Entities has been a member
of an affiliated group filing a consolidated federal income Tax
Return or has any liability for the Taxes of any Person (other
than a Hiland Group Entity) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
(or any similar provision of state, local, or foreign Law), as a
transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise.
(b) In each tax year since the formation of the Partnership
up to and including the current tax year, at least 90% of the
gross income of the Partnership has been income which is
qualifying income within the meaning of
Section 7704(d) of the Code.
Section 3.13 Labor
Matters. Except as disclosed in
Section 3.13 of the Hiland Disclosure Schedule, no Hiland
Group Entity, other than Partnership GP, has or has ever had
employees. Except for such matters which would not have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Hiland Material Adverse
Effect, no Hiland Group Entity has received written notice
during the past two years of the intent of any Governmental
Entity responsible for the enforcement of labor, employment,
occupational health and safety or workplace safety and
insurance/workers compensation laws to conduct an investigation
of the Hiland Group Entities and, to the Knowledge of the Hiland
Parties, no such investigation is in progress. Except for such
matters which would
A-10
not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Hiland Material
Adverse Effect, (i) there are no (and have not been during
the two-year period preceding the date hereof) strikes or
lockouts with respect to any employees of, or providing services
to, the Hiland Group Entities (Employees),
(ii) to the Knowledge of the Hiland Parties, there is no
(and has not been during the two-year period preceding the date
hereof) union organizing effort pending or threatened against
the Hiland Group Entities, (iii) there is no (and has not
been during the two-year period preceding the date hereof)
unfair labor practice, labor dispute or labor arbitration
proceeding pending or, to the Knowledge of the Hiland Parties,
threatened against the Hiland Group Entities, and
(iv) there is no (and has not been during the two-year
period preceding the date hereof) slowdown or work stoppage in
effect or, to the Knowledge of the Hiland Parties, threatened
with respect to Employees. No Hiland Group Entity has any
liabilities under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act and
the regulations promulgated thereunder or any similar state or
local law as a result of any action taken by a Hiland Group
Entity that would have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Hiland Material Adverse Effect. No Hiland Group Entity is a
party to any collective bargaining agreements.
Section 3.14 Title
to Properties and Rights-of-Way.
(a) Except as would not have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Hiland Material Adverse Effect, each of the Hiland
Group Entities has defensible title to all material real
property and good title to all material tangible personal
property owned by the Hiland Group Entities and which is
sufficient for the operation of their respective businesses as
presently conducted, free and clear of all Encumbrances except
Permitted Encumbrances.
(b) Each of the Hiland Group Entities has such consents,
easements, rights-of-way, permits or licenses from each Person
(collectively, rights-of-way) as are
sufficient to conduct its business in the manner described, and
subject to the limitations contained, in the Partnerships
annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, except for such
rights-of-way the absence of which would not, individually or in
the aggregate, result in a Hiland Material Adverse Effect. Each
of the Hiland Group Entities has fulfilled and performed all its
material obligations with respect to such rights-of-way and no
event has occurred that allows, or after notice or lapse of time
would allow, revocation or termination thereof or would result
in any impairment of the rights of the holder of any such
rights-of-way, except for such revocations, terminations and
impairments that would not, individually or in the aggregate,
result in a Hiland Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.15 Opinion
of Financial Advisor. The Conflicts Committee
has received the written opinion of Jefferies &
Company, Inc., dated as of the date of this Agreement, to the
effect that, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration is
fair to the holders of Common Units (excluding Common Units
owned by Partnership GP and its Affiliates (including Holdings))
from a financial point of view.
Section 3.16 Required
Approvals. Partnership GP has approved this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
and directed that this Agreement and the Merger be submitted to
a vote of Unitholders as required under
Section 17-211
of the DRULPA and under Articles XIII and XIV of the
Partnership Agreement. The Board of Directors, upon the
unanimous recommendation of its Conflicts Committee, at a
meeting duly called and held, has, (i) determined that this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby are
advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the Partnership
and the holders of Common Units (excluding Common Units owned by
Partnership GP and its Affiliates (including Holdings)),
(ii) approved the Merger and this Agreement and
(iii) recommended that this Agreement and the Merger be
approved by holders of Common Units (excluding Common Units
owned by Partnership GP and its Affiliates (including Holdings))
(including the Conflicts Committees recommendation, the
Recommendation). The members of Partnership
GP have approved this Agreement and the Merger.
Section 3.17 Material
Contracts.
(a) Except for this Agreement or as designated as an
exhibit to the Partnerships annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 or to a Hiland SEC
Document filed thereafter and prior to the date of this
Agreement, neither the Partnership nor any of its Subsidiaries
is a party to or bound by, as of the date hereof, any Contract
(whether written or oral) which is a material
contract (as such term is defined
A-11
in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC) (all contracts of the type described in this
Section 3.17(a) being referred to herein as
Material Contracts).
(b) (i) Each Material Contract (other than the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement) is valid and binding on the
Partnership and any of its Subsidiaries that is a party thereto,
as applicable, and in full force and effect, except where the
failure to be valid, binding and in full force and effect,
either individually or in the aggregate, would not have a Hiland
Material Adverse Effect, (ii) the Partnership and each of
its Subsidiaries has in all material respects performed all
obligations required to be performed by it under each Material
Contract (other than the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement),
except where such noncompliance, either individually or in the
aggregate, would not have a Hiland Material Adverse Effect, and
(iii) neither the Partnership nor any of its Subsidiaries
knows of, or has received notice of, the existence of any event
or condition which constitutes, or, after notice or lapse of
time or both, will constitute, a material default on the part of
the Partnership or any of its Subsidiaries under any such
Material Contract (other than the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement), except where such default, either individually or in
the aggregate, would not have a Hiland Material Adverse Effect.
(c) The Hiland Operating Credit Agreement is valid and
binding on Hiland Operating, LLC and in full force and effect.
Except for a Ratio Default, (i) each Hiland Group Entity
has performed all obligations required to be performed by it
under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, and (ii) no
Hiland Group Entity is in breach, default (or after notice or
lapse of time or both, would be in default) or violation in the
performance of any obligation, agreement or condition contained
in the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
Section 3.18 State
Takeover Laws. No approvals are required
under state takeover or similar laws in connection with the
performance by the Hiland Parties or their Affiliates of their
obligations under this Agreement, the Support Agreement, the
Rollover Commitments or the transactions contemplated hereby or
thereby.
Section 3.19 Finders
or Brokers. Except for Jefferies &
Company, Inc., none of the Hiland Parties (including through its
respective board of directors (or similar governing body) or any
committee thereof) has engaged any investment banker, broker or
finder in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement who would be entitled to any fee or any commission in
connection with or upon consummation of the Merger or the other
transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 3.20 No
Other Representations or Warranties. Except
for the representations and warranties contained in this
Article III and except as otherwise expressly set forth in
this Agreement or in the agreements or certificates entered into
in connection herewith or contemplated hereby, none of the
Hiland Parties nor any other Person on behalf of the Hiland
Parties makes any other representation or warranty of any kind
or nature, express or implied, in connection with this Agreement
or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE IV
Representations
and Warranties of the Parent Parties
Except as disclosed in a section of the disclosure schedule
delivered concurrently herewith by Parent to the Hiland Parties
immediately prior to the execution of this Agreement (the
Parent Disclosure Schedule) corresponding to
the applicable sections of this Article IV to which such
disclosure applies (provided, however, that any
information set forth in one section of such Parent Disclosure
Schedule also shall be deemed to apply to each other section of
this Agreement to which its relevance is reasonably apparent),
the Parent Parties hereby represent and warrant, jointly and
severally, to the Hiland Parties as follows:
Section 4.1 Qualification;
Organization.
(a) Each of the Parent Parties is a legal entity validly
existing and in good standing under the Laws of its respective
jurisdiction of formation. Each of the Parent Parties has all
requisite limited liability company power and authority to own,
lease and operate its properties and assets and to carry on its
business as presently conducted in all material respects.
A-12
(b) Each of the Parent Parties is duly registered or
qualified to do business and is in good standing as a foreign
limited liability company in each jurisdiction where the
ownership, leasing or operation of its assets or properties or
the conduct of its business requires such registration or
qualification, except where the failure to be so registered,
qualified or in good standing would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect. The
organizational or governing documents of the Parent Parties, as
previously made available to the Hiland Parties, are in full
force and effect. None of the Parent Parties is in violation of
its organizational or governing documents.
Section 4.2 Authority;
No Violation; Consents and Approvals.
(a) Each of the Parent Parties has all requisite limited
liability company power and authority to enter into this
Agreement and to carry out its obligations hereunder and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution,
delivery and performance by each Parent Party of this Agreement
and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
have been duly authorized by all requisite limited liability
company action on the part of such Parent Party, and no other
limited liability company proceedings on the part of a Parent
Party are necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement.
(b) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
each Parent Party and, assuming the due authorization, execution
and delivery hereof by the Hiland Parties, constitutes a legal,
valid and binding agreement of such Parent Party, enforceable
against such Parent Party in accordance with its terms (except
insofar as such enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy,
insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and
similar laws relating to or affecting creditors rights
generally and by general principles of equity (regardless of
whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in
equity or at law)).
(c) Except for matters expressly contemplated by this
Agreement and matters described in clauses (ii), (iii) or
(iv) below that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, neither the
execution and delivery by the Parent Parties of this Agreement,
nor the consummation by the Parent Parties of the transactions
contemplated hereby and the performance by the Parent Parties of
this Agreement will (i) violate or conflict with any
provision of the governing documents of the Parent Parties;
(ii) require any consent, approval, authorization or permit
of, registration, declaration or filing with, or notification
to, any Governmental Entity or any other person;
(iii) result in any breach of or constitute a default (or
an event that, with notice or lapse of time or both, would
become a default) under, or give to others any right of
termination, cancellation, amendment or acceleration of any
obligation or the loss of any benefit under any agreement or
instrument to which any of the Parent Parties is a party or by
or to which any of their properties are bound; (iv) result
in the creation of an Encumbrance upon any of the assets of any
of the Parent Parties; or (v) violate or conflict in any
material respect with any material Law applicable to the Parent
Parties.
(d) Section 4.2(d) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule
identifies all material consents, approvals and authorizations
of any Governmental Entity or third party that are required to
be obtained by any Parent Parties in connection with
(1) the execution and delivery by the Parent Parties of
this Agreement or (2) the consummation by the Parent
Parties of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
except for such consents, approvals and authorizations that, if
not obtained, would not, individually or in the aggregate, have
a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.3 Proxy
Statement; Other Information. None of the
information supplied or to be supplied by the Parent Parties,
their controlling Affiliates, Continental Gas Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Continental Gas), the
Harold Hamm DST Trust or the Harold Hamm HJ Trust (together with
the Harold Hamm DST Trust, the Trusts) in
writing for inclusion in the Proxy Statement will at the time of
the mailing of the Proxy Statement to the Unitholders of the
Partnership, at the time of the Partnership Meeting (as such
Proxy Statement shall have been amended or supplemented prior to
the date of the Partnership Meeting), and at the time of any
amendments thereof or supplements thereto, and none of the
information supplied or to be supplied by the Parent Parties,
their controlling Affiliates, Continental Gas or the Trusts in
writing for inclusion in the
Schedule 13E-3
to be filed with the SEC concurrently with the filing of the
Proxy Statement, will, at the time of its filing with the SEC,
and at the time of any amendments thereof or supplements
thereto, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state any material fact required to be stated therein
A-13
or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
Section 4.4 Funding. On
the Closing Date, the Parent Parties will have sufficient cash
to enable them to make payment of the aggregate Merger
Consideration and the Parent Parties related fees and
expenses (the Funding). For the avoidance of
doubt, it shall not be a condition to the obligations of the
Parent Parties to effect the Merger for the Parent Parties to
obtain the Funding or any other financing of the Merger
Consideration and the Parent Parties related fees and
expenses. Section 4.4 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule
sets forth true, accurate and complete copies of
(i) executed equity commitment letters (the
Funding Commitments) to provide the Funding
to Parent or Merger Sub and (ii) the Rollover Commitments.
As of the date hereof, the Funding Commitments are in full force
and effect and have not been withdrawn or terminated or
otherwise amended or modified in any respect and none of the
Parent Parties is in breach of any of the terms or conditions
set forth therein and no event has occurred which, with or
without notice, lapse of time or both, could reasonably be
expected to constitute a material breach or failure to satisfy a
condition precedent set forth therein.
Section 4.5 Ownership
and Operations of Merger Sub. As of the date
of this Agreement, all of the issued and outstanding Merger Sub
LLC Interests are, and at the Effective Time will be, owned by
Parent, the Harold Hamm DST Trust and the Harold Hamm HJ Trust,
and such Merger Sub LLC Interests have been duly authorized and
validly issued in accordance with applicable Laws and the
limited liability company agreement of Merger Sub and are fully
paid (to the extent required by the limited liability company
agreement of Merger Sub) and nonassessable (except to the extent
such nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 18-607
and 18-804
of DLLCA). Merger Sub has not conducted any business other than
incident to its formation and pursuant to this Agreement, the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby and the
financing of such transactions.
Section 4.6 Finders
or Brokers. Except for Wachovia Capital
Markets, LLC, none of the Parent Parties has engaged any
investment banker, broker or finder in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement who might be
entitled to any fee or any commission in connection with or upon
consummation of the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated hereby.
Section 4.7 Access
to Information; No Other Representations or Warranties;
Disclaimer.
(a) Each of Parent and Merger Sub has conducted its own
investigations of the Hiland Group Entities and acknowledges
that it has been provided adequate access to the personnel,
properties, premises and records of the Hiland Group Entities
for such purpose.
(b) Except for the representations and warranties contained
in this Article IV and except as otherwise expressly set
forth in this Agreement or in the agreements or certificates
entered into in connection herewith or contemplated hereby, none
of the Parent Parties nor any other Person on behalf of the
Parent Parties makes any other representation or warranty of any
kind or nature, express or implied, in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(c) Except for the representations and warranties expressly
set forth in this Agreement or in the agreements or certificates
entered into in connection herewith or contemplated hereby,
neither Parent nor Merger Sub has relied on any representation
or warranty, express or implied, with respect to the Hiland
Group Entities or with respect to any other information provided
or made available to Parent or Merger Sub in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. None of the Hiland
Group Entities nor any other Person will have or be subject to
any liability or indemnification obligation to Parent, Merger
Sub or any other Person resulting from the distribution to
Parent or Merger Sub, or use by Parent or Merger Sub of any such
information, including any information, documents, projections,
forecasts or other material made available to Parent or Merger
Sub or management presentations in expectation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
A-14
ARTICLE V
Covenants
and Agreements
Section 5.1 Conduct
of Business by the Partnership and Parent.
(a) From and after the date hereof and prior to the
Effective Time or the date, if any, on which this Agreement is
earlier terminated pursuant to Article VII, and except
(i) as required by applicable Law, (ii) with the prior
written consent of Parent (which shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed), (iii) as expressly
provided for and permitted by this Agreement or (iv) as
disclosed in Section 5.1(a) of the Hiland Disclosure
Schedule, the Hiland Parties shall, and shall cause the other
Hiland Group Entities to, (A) conduct the business of such
Hiland Group Entities in the ordinary course consistent with
past practice, (B) use their commercially reasonable
efforts to maintain and preserve intact the present business
organizations and material rights and franchises of such Hiland
Group Entities, to keep available the services of the current
Employees and the current officers and consultants of, or
providing services to, the Hiland Group Entities, and to
maintain and preserve in all material respects the relationships
of such Hiland Group Entities with customers, suppliers and
others having business dealings with them, and (C) take no
action that would materially adversely affect or delay the
ability of any of the parties hereto from obtaining any
necessary approvals of any Governmental Entity required for the
transactions contemplated hereby, performing its covenants and
agreements under this Agreement or consummating the transactions
contemplated hereby or that would otherwise materially delay or
prohibit consummation of the Merger or other transactions
contemplated hereby; provided, however, that any
action taken or omitted to be taken by an officer of a Hiland
Party at the direction of any of the Parent Parties or
Mr. Hamm (other than (1) in his capacity as part of,
(2) in accordance with authority delegated to him by, or
(3) as otherwise authorized by, the Board of Directors or
any committee thereof) that would otherwise constitute a breach
of this Section 5.1 shall not constitute such a breach.
(b) Without limiting the generality of Section 5.1(a),
the Hiland Parties agree that, except (i) as required by
applicable Law, (ii) with the prior written consent of
Parent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed), (iii) as expressly provided for and permitted by
this Agreement or (iv) as disclosed in Section 5.1(b)
of the Hiland Disclosure Schedule, the Hiland Parties will not,
and agree that they will cause the other Hiland Group Entities
not to:
(i) make any change in any of their organizational or
governing documents, other than changes expressly provided for
in this Agreement;
(ii) issue, deliver or sell or authorize or propose the
issuance, delivery or sale of, any of their Partnership
Interests or equity securities or securities convertible into
their Partnership Interests or equity securities, or
subscriptions, rights, warrants or options to acquire or other
agreements or commitments of any character obligating any of
them to issue any such Partnership Interests or equity
securities (other than restricted units, phantom units or unit
options to current or newly-hired employees consistent with past
practice of up to 50,000 Common Units in the aggregate in
accordance with the Hiland LTIP);
(iii) except for any distributions from the
Partnerships Subsidiaries to the Partnership, declare, set
aside or pay any distributions in respect of the Partnership
Interests or other ownership interests, or split, combine or
reclassify any of the Partnership Interests or other ownership
interests or issue or authorize the issuance of any other
Partnership Interests or other ownership interests in respect
of, in lieu of or in substitution for any of the Partnership
Interests or other ownership interests, or purchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of the
Partnership Interests or other ownership interests other than
repurchases of Partnership Interests in accordance with the
Hiland LTIP;
(iv) merge into or with any other Person;
(v) make any acquisition of, capital contribution to or
investment in assets or stock of any person, whether by way of
merger, consolidation, tender offer, share exchange or other
activity other than (A) as provided for in the Budget,
(B) ordinary-course overnight investments consistent with
past cash management practices, (C) investments in wholly
owned subsidiaries, (D) investments in Partially Owned
Entities owned as of the Execution Date as required under the
governing documents of such Partially Owned
A-15
Entities, (E) investments by Partnership GP in the
Partnership pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, and
(F) acquisitions, capital contributions or investments in
addition to those contemplated by (B) through
(E) above up to an aggregate amount of $1,000,000; provided
that the aggregate amount of consideration for such
acquisitions, capital contributions or investments contemplated
by (B) through (F) above shall not exceed $2,000,000
in the aggregate;
(vi) except as permitted by exclusions under other clauses
of this Section 5.1(b), other than in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice, enter into any
material contract or agreement or terminate or amend in any
material respect any material contract or agreement to which it
is a party or waive any material rights under any material
contract or agreement to which it is a party;
(vii) acquire or lease assets or properties, individually
or in a series of transactions, with a cost in excess of
$250,000 other than as provided for in the Budget or pursuant to
clause (xi);
(viii) incur, assume or guarantee any indebtedness for
borrowed money, issue, assume or guarantee any debt securities,
grant any option, warrant or right to purchase any debt
securities, or issue any securities convertible into or
exchangeable for any debt securities (other than in connection
with (A) borrowings in the ordinary course of business or
provided for in the Budget, in each case in accordance with any
existing bank credit facilities, (B) the refinancing or
replacement of existing indebtedness (provided that such
refinancing or replacement is on substantially comparable
terms), (C) other than as permitted by (A) and
(B) above, the incurrence by the Partnership of up to
$1,000,000 in principal amount of indebtedness and (D) a
transaction that is permitted by clauses (v) and (xi);
(ix) (A) sell, assign, transfer, abandon, lease or
otherwise dispose of assets having a fair market value in excess
of $1,000,000 in the aggregate, except for (1) assets
listed on Section 5.1(b)(ix) of the Hiland Disclosure
Schedule, (2) idled assets and (3) dispositions of
inventory or worn-out or obsolete equipment for fair value in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
or (B) grant any security interest with respect to, pledge
or otherwise encumber any assets other than Permitted
Encumbrances and security interests granted after the Execution
Date (i) with respect to assets acquired after the
Execution Date (which acquisition is otherwise permitted by this
Agreement) pursuant to related financing arrangements or
(ii) with respect to assets already owned prior to the
Execution Date, pursuant to the requirements of existing
financial arrangements;
(x) (A) settle any claims, demands, lawsuits or state
or federal regulatory proceedings for damages to the extent such
settlements in the aggregate assess damages in excess of
$1,000,000 (other than any claims, demands, lawsuits or
proceedings to the extent insured (net of deductibles), to the
extent reserved against in the Hiland Financial Statements or to
the extent covered by an indemnity obligation not subject to
dispute or adjustment from a solvent indemnitor) or
(B) settle any claims, demands, lawsuits or state or
federal regulatory proceedings seeking an injunction or other
equitable relief where such settlements would have a Hiland
Material Adverse Effect;
(xi) except as set forth in Section 5.1(b)(xi) of the
Hiland Disclosure Schedule or as required on an emergency basis
or for the safety of persons or the environment, make any
capital expenditure in excess of $1,000,000 in the aggregate
(other than as permitted by clause (v));
(xii) make any material change in their tax methods,
principles or elections;
(xiii) make any material change to their financial
reporting and accounting methods other than as required by a
change in GAAP;
(xiv) (A) grant any increases in the compensation of
any of their executive officers, except in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice or as required by the
terms of an existing Employee Benefit Plan or agreement or by
applicable Law, (B) amend any existing employment or
severance or termination contract with any executive officer,
(C) become obligated under any new pension plan, welfare
plan, multiemployer plan, Employee Benefit Plan, severance plan,
change of control or other benefit arrangement or similar plan
or arrangement, or (D) amend any Employee Benefit Plan, if
such amendment would have the effect of materially enhancing any
benefits thereunder;
A-16
(xv) voluntarily dissolve or otherwise adopt or vote to
adopt a plan of complete or partial dissolution or
liquidation; or
(xvi) agree or commit to do any of the foregoing.
Section 5.2 Investigation. From
the date hereof until the Effective Time and subject to the
requirements of applicable Laws, the Hiland Parties shall
(a) provide to the Parent Parties and their respective
counsel, financial advisors, auditors and other authorized
representatives reasonable access during normal business hours
after reasonable prior notice to the offices, properties, books
and records of the Hiland Group Entities, (b) furnish to
the Parent Parties and their respective counsel, financial
advisors, auditors and other authorized representatives such
financial and operating data and other information as such
persons may reasonably request (including furnishing to Parent
the financial results of the Partnership and its Subsidiaries in
advance of any filing by the Partnership with the SEC or other
public disclosure containing such financial results), and
(c) instruct the employees, counsel, financial advisors,
auditors and other authorized representatives of the Hiland
Group Entities to cooperate with Parent in its investigation of
the Hiland Group Entities, as the case may be. Notwithstanding
the foregoing provisions of this Section 5.2, the Hiland
Parties shall not be required to, or to cause any of their
Subsidiaries to, grant access or furnish information to Parent
or any of its representatives to the extent that such
information is subject to an attorney/client or attorney work
product privilege or that such access or the furnishing of such
information is prohibited by Law or an existing contract or
agreement. Parent shall hold, and shall cause its counsel,
financial advisors, auditors and representatives to hold, any
material or competitively sensitive non-public information
concerning a Hiland Group Entity received from the Hiland Group
Entities confidential. Partnership GP will provide Parent
(solely for informational purposes) a true and complete copy of
the opinion referenced in Section 3.15 promptly after
delivery thereof. Any investigation pursuant to this
Section 5.2 shall be conducted in such manner as not to
interfere unreasonably with the conduct of the business of the
Hiland Group Entities. No information or knowledge obtained by
Parent in any investigation pursuant to this Section 5.2
shall affect or be deemed to modify any representation or
warranty made by the Hiland Parties in Article III or any
condition set forth in Article VI.
Section 5.3 No
Solicitation.
(a) Subject to
Sections 5.3(b)-(h),
the Hiland Parties shall not and shall cause their officers,
directors, employees, agents and representatives
(Representatives) not to, and shall use their
reasonable best efforts to cause each of the other Hiland Group
Entities and their Representatives not to, directly or
indirectly, (i) initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage
(including by providing information) or knowingly facilitate any
inquiries, proposals or offers with respect to, or the making or
completion of, an Alternative Proposal (as defined herein),
(ii) engage or participate in any negotiations concerning,
or provide or cause to be provided any non-public information or
data relating to, the Hiland Group Entities, in connection with,
or have any discussions with any person relating to, an
Alternative Proposal, or otherwise knowingly encourage or
knowingly facilitate any effort or attempt to make or implement
an Alternative Proposal, (iii) approve, endorse or
recommend, or propose publicly to approve, endorse or recommend,
any Alternative Proposal, (iv) approve, endorse or
recommend, or propose to approve, endorse or recommend, or
execute or enter into, any letter of intent, agreement in
principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option
agreement or other similar agreement relating to any Alternative
Proposal, (v) amend, terminate, waive or fail to enforce,
or grant any consent under, any confidentiality, standstill or
similar agreement, (vi) take, encourage or facilitate any
action that Section 5.3(a) of the Holdings Agreement would
prohibit if the Hiland Parties were the Holdings
Parties, as such term is defined and used therein, or
(vii) resolve to propose or agree to do any of the
foregoing.
(b) The Hiland Parties shall and shall cause their
Representatives to, and shall use their reasonable best efforts
to cause each of the other Hiland Group Entities and their
Representatives to, immediately cease any existing
solicitations, discussions or negotiations with any Person
(other than the parties hereto) that has made or indicated an
intention to make an Alternative Proposal. The Hiland Parties
shall promptly, and in any event not later than ten
(10) days following the date hereof, request that each
Person who has executed a confidentiality agreement with a
Hiland Party in connection with that Persons consideration
of a transaction
A-17
involving any Hiland Group Entity that would constitute an
Alternative Proposal return or destroy all non-public
information furnished to that Person by or on behalf of the
Hiland Group Entities.
(c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
Section 5.3(a), prior to the receipt of Unitholder
Approval, the Hiland Parties may, in response to an unsolicited
Alternative Proposal which did not result from or arise in
connection with a breach of this Section 5.3 and which the
Conflicts Committee determines, in good faith, after
consultation with its outside counsel and financial advisors,
constitutes or could reasonably be expected to result in a
Superior Proposal (as defined herein), (i) furnish
information with respect to the Hiland Group Entities to the
person making such Alternative Proposal and its Representatives
pursuant to an executed confidentiality agreement no less
restrictive (including with respect to standstill provisions) of
the other party than the Confidentiality Agreement and
(ii) participate in discussions or negotiations with such
person and its Representatives regarding such Alternative
Proposal; provided, however, (A) that Parent
shall be entitled to receive an executed copy of such
confidentiality agreement prior to or substantially
simultaneously with the Hiland Parties furnishing information to
the person making such Alternative Proposal or its
Representatives and (B) that the Hiland Parties shall
simultaneously provide or make available to Parent any
non-public information concerning the Hiland Group Entities that
is provided to the person making such Alternative Proposal or
its Representatives which was not previously provided or made
available to Parent. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
Section 5.3(a), prior to the receipt of Unitholder
Approval, the Hiland Parties may participate in discussions or
negotiations with the lenders under the Hiland Operating Credit
Agreement regarding debt financing transactions with such
lenders that may involve equity issuances that would constitute
an Alternative Proposal and, in connection therewith, furnish
information with respect to the Hiland Group Entities to such
lenders pursuant to confidentiality obligations substantially
consistent with past practice.
(d) Neither the Board of Directors nor any committee
thereof shall withdraw, modify or qualify in a manner adverse to
Parent, or resolve to or publicly propose to withdraw, modify or
qualify in a manner adverse to Parent, the Recommendation (any
of the foregoing actions, whether taken by the Board of
Directors or any committee thereof, a Change in Board
Recommendation). Notwithstanding the immediately
preceding sentence, if, prior to receipt of the Unitholder
Approval, (i) the Board of Directors or the Conflicts
Committee determines in good faith, after consultation with its
respective outside counsel and financial advisors, that a Change
in Board Recommendation would be in the best interests of the
holders of Common Units (other than Partnership GP and its
Affiliates (including Holdings)) and (ii) the Board of
Directors or the Conflicts Committee, as applicable, provides
Parent with at least three (3) Business Days advance
written notice of its intention to make a Change in Board
Recommendation and specifying the material events giving rise
thereto, then the Board of Directors or the Conflicts Committee,
as applicable, may make a Change in Board Recommendation.
(e) The Hiland Parties promptly (and in any event within
24 hours) shall advise Parent orally and in writing of the
receipt by either of them of (i) any Alternative Proposal
or (ii) any request for non-public information relating to
the Hiland Group Entities, other than requests for information
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
and not reasonably expected to be related to an Alternative
Proposal, including in each case the identity of the person
making any such Alternative Proposal or request and the material
terms and conditions of any such Alternative Proposal or request
(including copies of any document or correspondence evidencing
such Alternative Proposal or request). The Hiland Parties shall
keep Parent reasonably informed on a current basis of the status
(including any material change to the terms thereof) of any such
Alternative Proposal or request.
(f) Nothing contained in this Agreement shall prohibit the
Hiland Parties or the Board of Directors or any committee
thereof from disclosing to the Partnerships Unitholders a
position contemplated by
Rules 14d-9
and 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act; provided,
however, that none of the Hiland Parties or the Board of
Directors or any committee thereof shall in any event be
entitled to disclose a position under
Rules 14d-9
or 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act other than the
Recommendation, except in accordance with Section 5.3(d).
(g) As used in this Agreement, Alternative
Proposal shall mean any inquiry, proposal or offer
from any Person or group of Persons other than the Parent
Parties, relating to, or that could reasonably be expected to
A-18
lead to, in one transaction or a series of related transactions,
(i) a merger, tender or exchange offer, consolidation,
reorganization, reclassification, recapitalization, liquidation
or dissolution, or other business combination involving any
Hiland Group Entity, (ii) the issuance by the Partnership
of (A) any General Partner Interest or (B) any class
of Partnership Interests constituting more than 15% of such
class of Partnership Interests or (iii) the acquisition in
any manner, directly or indirectly, of (A) any General
Partner Interest, (B) any class of Partnership Interests
constituting more than 15% of such class of Partnership
Interests or (C) more than 15% of the consolidated total
assets of the Hiland Group Entities (including equity interests
in any Subsidiary or Partially Owned Entity of the Partnership),
in each case other than the Merger and the Holdings Merger.
(h) As used in this Agreement, Superior
Proposal shall mean any written Alternative Proposal
(i) on terms which the Conflicts Committee determines in
good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel
and financial advisors, to be more favorable from a financial
point of view to the holders of Common Units (other than
Partnership GP and its Affiliates (including Holdings))
(excluding consideration of any interests that any holder may
have other than as a Unitholder of the Partnership entitled to
the Merger Consideration) than the Merger, taking into account
all the terms and conditions of such proposal, and this
Agreement (including any proposal or offer by the Parent Parties
to amend the terms of this Agreement and the Merger) and
(ii) that is reasonably capable of being completed, taking
into account all financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects
of such proposal; provided that for purposes of the
definition Superior Proposal, the references to
15% in the definition of Alternative
Proposal shall be deemed to be references to
55%.
Section 5.4 Filings;
Other Actions.
(a) As promptly as reasonably practicable following the
date of this Agreement, the Hiland Parties shall prepare the
Proxy Statement, which shall, subject to Section 5.3(d),
include the Recommendation, and the Hiland Parties and Parent
shall prepare the
Schedule 13E-3.
Parent and the Hiland Parties shall cooperate with each other in
connection with the preparation of the foregoing documents. The
Hiland Parties will use their commercially reasonable efforts to
have the Proxy Statement, and Parent and the Hiland Parties will
use their commercially reasonable efforts to have the
Schedule 13E-3,
cleared by the SEC as promptly as practicable after such filing.
The Hiland Parties will use their commercially reasonable
efforts to cause the Proxy Statement to be mailed to the
Partnerships Unitholders as promptly as practicable after
the Proxy Statement is cleared by the SEC. The Hiland Parties
shall as promptly as practicable notify Parent of the receipt of
any oral or written comments from the SEC relating to the Proxy
Statement or
Schedule 13E-3.
The Hiland Parties shall cooperate and provide Parent with a
reasonable opportunity to review and comment on the draft of the
Proxy Statement (including each amendment or supplement
thereto), which comments shall be considered reasonably and in
good faith by the Hiland Parties, and Parent and the Hiland
Parties shall cooperate and provide each other with a reasonable
opportunity to review and comment on the draft
Schedule 13E-3
(including each amendment or supplement thereto), which comments
shall be considered reasonably and in good faith by the other
party, and all responses to requests for additional information
by and replies to comments of the SEC, prior to filing such with
or sending such to the SEC, and Parent and the Hiland Parties
will provide each other with copies of all such filings made and
correspondence with the SEC with respect thereto. If at any time
prior to the Effective Time, any information should be
discovered by any party hereto which should be set forth in an
amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement or the
Schedule 13E-3
so that the Proxy Statement or the
Schedule 13E-3
would not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to
state any material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, the
party which discovers such information shall promptly notify the
other parties hereto and, to the extent required by applicable
Law, an appropriate amendment or supplement describing such
information shall be promptly filed by the Hiland Parties with
the SEC and disseminated by the Hiland Parties to the
Unitholders of the Partnership.
(b) The Hiland Parties shall (i) take all action
necessary in accordance with applicable Laws and the Partnership
Agreement to duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a
meeting of the Partnerships Unitholders as promptly as
reasonably practicable following the mailing of the Proxy
Statement for the purpose of obtaining the Unitholder Approval
of the Merger and this Agreement (such meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof, the Partnership
Meeting), and (ii) subject to a Change in Board
A-19
Recommendation in accordance with Section 5.3(d), use all
commercially reasonable efforts to solicit from its Unitholders
proxies in favor of the adoption and approval of this Agreement
and the Merger. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to
the contrary, unless this Agreement is terminated in accordance
with Article VII, the Hiland Parties will take all of the
actions contemplated by this Section 5.4 regardless of
whether there has been a Change in Board Recommendation, and
shall direct that this Agreement be submitted to a vote of
Unitholders in accordance with the requirements of
Articles XIII and XIV of the Partnership Agreement.
Section 5.5 Equity
Awards. The Hiland LTIP and each award of
Restricted Units (except as expressly provided otherwise in
Section 2.1(a) with respect to awards held by nonemployee
members of the Board of Directors), Phantom Units (as defined in
the Hiland LTIP) and Options (as defined in the Hiland LTIP)
outstanding under the Hiland LTIP immediately prior to the
Effective Time will remain outstanding in accordance with its
terms as a plan or equity compensation award, as applicable, of
the Surviving Entity and shall be unaffected by the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. Prior to the Effective Time, the
Partnership shall take any action necessary pursuant to the
Hiland LTIP to achieve this result.
Section 5.6 Efforts.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement, each of the parties hereto shall, and the Hiland
Parties shall cause the other Hiland Group Entities to, use
their commercially reasonable efforts (subject to, and in
accordance with, applicable Law) to take promptly, or to cause
to be taken, all actions, and to do promptly, or to cause to be
done, and to assist and to cooperate with the other parties in
doing, all things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate
and make effective the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby, including (i) the obtaining of all
necessary actions or nonactions, waivers, consents and approvals
from Governmental Entities and the making of all necessary
registrations and filings and the taking of all steps as may be
necessary to obtain an approval or waiver from, or to avoid an
action or proceeding by, any Governmental Entity, (ii) the
obtaining of all necessary consents, approvals or waivers from
third parties, (iii) the defending of any lawsuits or other
legal proceedings, whether judicial or administrative,
challenging this Agreement or the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby and (iv) the execution and
delivery of any additional instruments reasonably necessary to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. In addition,
Parent shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the
Funding in accordance with the Funding Commitments.
(b) Subject to the terms and conditions herein provided and
without limiting the foregoing, the Hiland Parties and the
Parent Parties shall (i) if required, as promptly as
practicable after the date hereof, make their respective filings
and thereafter make any other required submissions under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C.
§ 18a, as amended (the HSR Act),
(ii) use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with
each other in (x) determining whether any filings are
required to be made with, or consents, permits, authorizations,
waivers or approvals are required to be obtained from, any third
parties or other Governmental Entities in connection with the
execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby and (y) timely making
all such filings and timely seeking all such consents, permits,
authorizations or approvals, (iii) use commercially
reasonable efforts to take, or to cause to be taken, all other
actions and to do, or to cause to be done, all other things
necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make effective
the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby,
including taking all such further action as reasonably may be
necessary to resolve such objections, if any, as the United
States Federal Trade Commission, the Antitrust Division of the
United States Department of Justice, state or foreign antitrust
enforcement authorities or competition authorities, other
Governmental Entities in connection with the HSR Act, or other
state or federal regulatory authorities of any other nation or
other jurisdiction or any other person may assert under
Regulatory Law (as defined herein) with respect to the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated hereby, and to avoid or
eliminate each and every impediment under any Law that may be
asserted by any Governmental Entity with respect to the Merger
so as to enable the Closing to occur as soon as reasonably
possible (and in any event no later than the End Date), and
(iv) subject to applicable legal limitations and the
instructions of any Governmental Entity, use commercially
reasonable efforts to keep each other apprised of the status of
matters relating to the completion of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including to the extent
permitted by Law promptly furnishing the other with copies of
notices or other communications received by the Hiland Parties
or any of their
A-20
Subsidiaries or the Parent Parties, as the case may be, from any
third party
and/or any
Governmental Entity with respect thereto.
(c) Subject to the rights of the Parent Parties in
Section 5.11, and in furtherance and not in limitation of
the covenants of the parties contained in this Section 5.6,
if any administrative or judicial action or proceeding,
including any proceeding by a private party, is instituted (or
threatened to be instituted) challenging the Merger or any other
transaction contemplated by this Agreement, each of the Hiland
Parties or the Parent Parties shall cooperate in all respects
with each other and shall use their respective commercially
reasonable efforts to contest and resist any such action or
proceeding and to have vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned
any decree, judgment, injunction or other order, whether
temporary, preliminary or permanent, that is in effect and that
prohibits, prevents or restricts consummation of the Merger or
any other transactions contemplated hereby. Notwithstanding the
foregoing or any other provision of this Agreement, nothing in
this Section 5.6 shall limit a partys right to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(b)(i) or
(ii) so long as such party has, prior to such termination,
complied with its obligations under this Section 5.6.
(d) The Parent Parties and the Hiland Parties may, as each
deems advisable and necessary, reasonably designate any
competitively sensitive material provided to the other under
this Section 5.6 as Regulatory Counsel Only
Material. Such materials and the information contained
therein shall be given only to the outside regulatory counsel of
the recipient and will not be disclosed by such outside counsel
to employees, officers or directors of the recipient unless
express written permission is obtained in advance from the
source of the materials (the Parent Parties or the Hiland
Parties as the case may be) or its legal counsel.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Section 5.6, materials provided to the other party or its
outside counsel may be redacted to remove references concerning
the valuation of the Common Units or the business of the Hiland
Group Entities. For purposes of this Agreement,
Regulatory Law means any and all state,
federal and foreign statutes, rules, regulations, orders,
decrees, administrative and judicial doctrines and other Laws
requiring notice to, filings with, or the consent or approval
of, any Governmental Entity, or that otherwise may cause any
restriction, in connection with the Merger and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including (i) the Sherman Act of
1890, the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, the HSR Act, the
Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 and all other Laws that are
designed or intended to prohibit, restrict or regulate actions
having the purpose or effect of monopolization or restraint of
trade or lessening competition through merger or acquisition,
(ii) any Law governing any of the material operations or
assets of the Partnership and its Subsidiaries or (iii) any
Law with the purpose of protecting the national security or the
national economy of any nation.
Section 5.7 Takeover
Statute. Subject to Section 5.3(d), if
any fair price, moratorium,
control share acquisition or other form of
anti-takeover statute or regulation shall become applicable to
the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, the Support Agreement or the Rollover Commitments,
each of the Hiland Parties or the Parent Parties shall grant
such approvals and take such actions as are reasonably necessary
so that the Merger, the Support Agreement, the Rollover
Commitments and the other transactions contemplated hereby and
thereby may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the
terms contemplated herein and otherwise act to eliminate or
minimize the effects of such statute or regulation on the
Merger, the Support Agreement, the Rollover Commitments and the
other transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.
Section 5.8 Public
Announcements. Subject to
Section 5.3(d), the Hiland Parties and the Parent Parties
will consult with and provide each other the opportunity to
review and comment (which shall be considered reasonably and in
good faith by the other parties) upon any press release or other
public statement or comment prior to the issuance of such press
release or other public statement or comment relating to this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated herein and shall not
issue any such press release or other public statement or
comment prior to such consultation and opportunity to review and
comment except as may be required by applicable Law or by
obligations pursuant to any listing agreement with any national
securities exchange; provided, however, that any
public statement or disclosure that is consistent with a public
statement or disclosure previously approved by the other party
shall not require the prior approval of such other party. The
Hiland Parties and the Parent Parties agree to issue a joint
press release announcing the execution and delivery of this
Agreement.
A-21
Section 5.9 Indemnification
and Insurance.
(a) The partnership agreement of the Surviving Entity
shall, with respect to indemnification of directors and
officers, not be amended, repealed or otherwise modified after
the Effective Time in any manner that would adversely affect the
rights thereunder of the Persons who at any time prior to the
Effective Time were identified as prospective indemnitees under
the Partnership Agreement in respect of actions or omissions
occurring at or prior to the Effective Time (including the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement).
(b) For a period of six years after the Effective Time,
Parent and Partnership GP shall, and Parent and Partnership GP
shall cause the Surviving Entity (and its successors or assigns)
to, maintain officers and directors liability
insurance covering each person who is immediately prior to the
Effective Time, or has been at any time prior to the Effective
Time, an officer or director of any of the Hiland Group Entities
and each person who immediately prior to the Effective Time is
serving or prior to the Effective Time has served at the request
of any of the Hiland Group Entities as a director, officer,
trustee or fiduciary of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust, pension or other Employee Benefit Plan of the
Hiland Group Entities (collectively, the Hiland
D&O Indemnified Parties) who are or at any time
prior to the Effective Time were covered by the existing
officers and directors liability insurance
applicable to the Hiland Group Entities (D&O
Insurance) on terms substantially no less advantageous
to the Hiland D&O Indemnified Parties than such existing
insurance with respect to acts or omissions, or alleged acts or
omissions, prior to the Effective Time (whether claims, actions
or other proceedings relating thereto are commenced, asserted or
claimed before or after the Effective Time).
(c) The Partnership shall cause (and Parent, following the
Closing, shall continue to cause) coverage to be extended under
the D&O Insurance by obtaining a six-year tail
policy on terms and conditions no less advantageous than the
existing D&O Insurance, and such tail policy
shall satisfy the provisions of this Section 5.9;
provided that in no event shall Parent be required to
spend more than 250% (the Cap Amount) of the
last annual premium paid by the Hiland Group Entities prior to
the date hereof (the amount of such premium being set forth in
Section 5.9(c) of the Hiland Disclosure Schedule) per
policy year of coverage under such tail policy;
provided, further, that if the cost per policy
year of such insurance exceeds the Cap Amount, Parent shall
purchase as much coverage per policy year as reasonably
obtainable for the Cap Amount.
(d) The rights of each Hiland D&O Indemnified Party
hereunder shall be in addition to any other rights such Hiland
D&O Indemnified Party may have under the governing
documents of any Hiland Group Entity under applicable Delaware
Law or otherwise. The provisions of this Section 5.9 shall
survive the consummation of the Merger and expressly are
intended to benefit each of the Hiland D&O Indemnified
Parties.
(e) In the event Parent, Partnership GP or any of their
respective successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or
merges into any other person and shall not be the continuing or
surviving entity in such consolidation or merger or
(ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties
and assets to any person, then and in either such case, Parent
or Partnership GP, as the case may be, shall cause proper
provision to be made so that its successors or assigns shall
assume the obligations set forth in this Section 5.9.
Section 5.10 Unitholder
Litigation. The Hiland Parties shall give
Parent the opportunity to participate in the defense or
settlement of any Unitholder litigation against any of the
Hiland Group Entities
and/or their
respective directors relating to the Merger or any other
transactions contemplated hereby and no such settlement shall in
any event be agreed to without Parents consent (which
shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed).
Section 5.11 Notification
of Certain Matters. The Hiland Parties shall
give prompt notice to the Parent Parties, and the Parent Parties
shall give prompt notice to the Hiland Parties, of (i) any
notice or other communication received by such party from any
Governmental Entity in connection with the Merger or the other
transactions contemplated hereby or from any person alleging
that the consent of such person is or may be required in
connection with the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated hereby, if the subject matter of such communication
or the failure of such party to obtain such consent could be
material to the Partnership, the Surviving Entity or Parent,
(ii) any actions, suits, claims, investigations or
proceedings commenced or, to
A-22
such partys Knowledge, threatened against, relating to or
involving or otherwise affecting such party or any of its
Subsidiaries which relate to the Merger or the other
transactions contemplated hereby, (iii) the discovery of
any fact or circumstance that, or the occurrence or
non-occurrence of any event the occurrence or non-occurrence of
which, would, individually or in the aggregate, cause or result
in a Hiland Material Adverse Effect or a Parent Material Adverse
Effect, respectively; provided, however, that the
delivery of any notice pursuant to this Section 5.11 shall
not (x) cure any breach of, or non-compliance with, any
other provision of this Agreement or (y) limit the remedies
available to the party receiving such notice. The Hiland Parties
shall reasonably cooperate with the Parent Parties in efforts to
mitigate any adverse consequences to the Parent Parties which
may arise from any criminal or regulatory investigation or
action involving any of the Hiland Group Entities (including by
coordinating and providing assistance in meeting with
regulators).
Section 5.12 Rule 16b-3. Prior
to the Effective Time, the Partnership shall take such steps as
may be reasonably requested by any party hereto to cause
dispositions of Partnership equity securities (including
derivative securities) pursuant to the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement by each individual who is a director or
officer of the Partnership to be exempt under
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act in accordance with that
certain No-Action Letter dated January 12, 1999 issued by
the SEC regarding such matters.
ARTICLE VI
Conditions to the Merger
Section 6.1 Conditions
to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the
Merger. The respective obligations of each
party to effect the Merger shall be subject to the fulfillment
(or waiver by all parties) at or prior to the Effective Time of
each of the following conditions:
(a) the Unitholder Approval of this Agreement and the
Merger shall have been obtained;
(b) no restraining order, preliminary or permanent
injunction or other order issued by any court of competent
jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition enacted or
promulgated by any Governmental Entity restraining, enjoining or
otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Merger shall be in
effect; and
(c) any waiting period under the HSR Act applicable to the
consummation of the Merger shall have expired or been earlier
terminated.
Section 6.2 Conditions
to Obligation of the Hiland Parties to Effect the
Merger. The obligations of the Hiland Parties
to effect the Merger are further subject to the fulfillment at
or prior to the Effective Time of each of the following
conditions, any one or more of which may be waived in whole or
in part by the Hiland Parties:
(a) (i) the representations and warranties of the
Parent Parties contained in Section 4.1(a) (Qualification;
Organization) and Section 4.2 (Authority; No Violation;
Consents and Approvals) shall be true and correct in all
respects, in each case at and as of the date of this Agreement
and at and as of the Closing Date as though made at and as of
the Closing Date and (ii) the representations and
warranties of the Parent Parties set forth in this Agreement
(other than those referenced in clause (i) of this
paragraph) shall be true and correct in all respects
(disregarding any materiality or Parent Material Adverse Effect
qualifiers therein) at and as of the date of this Agreement and
at and as of the Closing Date as though made at and as of the
Closing Date, except where any failures of such representations
or warranties to be so true and correct would not have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse
Effect; provided, however, that, with respect to
clauses (i) and (ii) of this paragraph,
representations and warranties that are made as of a particular
date or period shall be true and correct (in the manner set
forth in clause (i) or (ii), as applicable) only as of such
date or period;
(b) the Parent Parties shall have performed all obligations
and complied with all covenants required by this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by them that are qualified by
materiality or Parent Material Adverse Effect and shall have in
all material respects performed all other obligations and
A-23
complied with all other covenants required by this Agreement to
be performed or complied with by them; and
(c) Parent shall have delivered to the Hiland Parties a
certificate, dated the Effective Time and signed by its Chief
Executive Officer or another senior executive officer,
certifying to the effect that the conditions set forth in
Sections 6.2(a) and 6.2(b) have been satisfied.
Section 6.3 Conditions
to Obligation of the Parent Parties to Effect the
Merger. The obligations of the Parent Parties
to effect the Merger are further subject to the fulfillment at
or prior to the Effective Time of each of the following
conditions, any one or more of which may be waived in whole or
in part by the Parent Parties:
(a) (i) the representations and warranties of the
Hiland Parties contained in Section 3.1(b) (Qualification,
Organization, Subsidiaries, Etc.), Section 3.2
(Capitalization), Section 3.3 (Authority; No Violation;
Consents and Approvals), Section 3.9(b) (Absence of Certain
Changes or Events), Section 3.16 (Required Approvals) and
Section 3.17(c) (Material Contracts) shall be true and
correct in all respects, except, in the case of
Section 3.2, for such inaccuracies as are de minimis
in the aggregate, in each case at and as of the date of this
Agreement and at and as of the Closing Date as though made at
and as of the Closing Date and (ii) the representations and
warranties of the Hiland Parties set forth in this Agreement
(other than those referenced in clause (i) of this
paragraph) shall be true and correct in all respects
(disregarding any materiality or Hiland Material Adverse Effect
qualifiers therein) as of the date of this Agreement and at and
as of the Closing Date as though made at and as of the Closing
Date, except where any failures of such representations or
warranties to be so true and correct would not have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Hiland Material Adverse
Effect; provided, however, that, with respect to
clauses (i) and (ii) of this paragraph,
representations and warranties that are made as of a particular
date or period shall be true and correct (in the manner set
forth in clause (i) or (ii), as applicable) only as of such
date or period; provided, further, that the
representations and warranties referenced in clauses (i)
and (ii) shall not be deemed to be inaccurate to the extent
that Parent had knowledge at the Execution Date of such
inaccuracy;
(b) the Hiland Parties shall have performed all obligations
and complied with all covenants required by this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by them that are qualified by
materiality or Hiland Material Adverse Effect and shall have in
all material respects performed all other obligations and
complied with all other covenants required by this Agreement to
be performed or complied with by them;
(c) since the date of this Agreement there shall not have
been any Hiland Material Adverse Effect;
(d) the Holdings Merger shall be effectuated concurrently
with the Merger; provided that the Parent Parties may not
waive this condition unless the Holdings Agreement and the
Holdings Merger shall have been submitted to a vote of
Unitholders and the outcome of such vote shall not have
constituted a Unitholder Approval; provided,
further, that for purposes of this clause 6.3(d),
the terms Unitholders and Unitholder
Approval shall have the meanings assigned to them in the
Holdings Agreement; and
(e) the Hiland Parties shall have delivered to the Parent
Parties a certificate, dated the Effective Time and signed by an
executive officer of the Partnership, certifying to the effect
that the conditions set forth in Sections 6.3(a), 6.3(b)
and 6.3(c) have been satisfied.
Section 6.4 Frustration
of Conditions. No party may rely on the
failure of any condition set forth in Section 6.1, 6.2 or
6.3, as the case may be, to be satisfied if such failure was
caused by such partys breach in any material respect of
any provision of this Agreement or failure to use commercially
reasonable efforts to consummate the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby, as required by and subject to
Section 5.6.
A-24
ARTICLE VII
Termination
Section 7.1 Termination
or Abandonment. Notwithstanding anything
contained in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement may
be terminated and abandoned at any time prior to the Effective
Time, whether before or after any approval of the matters
presented in connection with the Merger by the Unitholders of
the Partnership:
(a) by the mutual written consent of the Hiland Parties and
the Parent Parties;
(b) by either the Hiland Parties or the Parent Parties, if:
(i) the Effective Time shall not have occurred on or before
November 1, 2009 (the End Date) and the
party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 7.1(b)(i) shall not have breached its obligations
under this Agreement in any manner that shall have proximately
caused the failure to consummate the Merger on or before the End
Date;
(ii) an injunction, other legal restraint or order of any
Governmental Entity shall have been entered permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation
of the Merger and such injunction, other legal restraint or
order shall have become final and nonappealable; provided
that the party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to
this Section 7.1(b)(ii) shall have complied in all material
respects with its obligations in Section 5.6; or
(iii) the Partnership Meeting shall have concluded and,
upon a vote taken at such meeting, the Unitholder Approval of
this Agreement or the Merger shall not have been obtained;
provided that the right to terminate this Agreement
pursuant to this Section 7.1(b)(iii) shall not be available
to the Hiland Parties if any Hiland Party materially breached
any obligations under Section 5.3 or 5.4;
(c) by the Hiland Parties, if any Parent Party shall have
breached or failed to perform any of its representations,
warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in this
Agreement, which breach or failure to perform: (A) would
constitute the failure of a condition set forth in
Section 6.2(a) or 6.2(b) and (B)(I) is not capable of being
satisfied or cured by the End Date or (II) if capable of
being satisfied or cured, is not satisfied or cured by thirty
(30) days following receipt by Parent of written notice
stating the Hiland Parties intention to terminate this
Agreement pursuant to this Section 7.1(c) and the basis for
such termination; provided that the right to terminate
this Agreement pursuant to this paragraph shall not be available
to the Hiland Parties if, at such time, a condition set forth in
Section 6.3(a), 6.3(b) or 6.3(c) is not capable of being
satisfied; or
(d) by the Parent Parties, if:
(i) any Hiland Party shall have breached or failed to
perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or
other agreements contained in this Agreement, which breach or
failure to perform: (A) would constitute the failure of a
condition set forth in Section 6.3(a), 6.3(b) or 6.3(c) and
(B)(I) is not capable of being satisfied or cured by the End
Date or (II) if capable of being satisfied or cured, is not
satisfied or cured by thirty (30) days following receipt by
the Hiland Parties of written notice stating the Parent
Parties intention to terminate this Agreement pursuant to
this Section 7.1(d)(i) and the basis for such termination;
provided that the right to terminate this Agreement
pursuant to this paragraph shall not be available to the Parent
Parties if, at such time, a condition set forth in
Section 6.2(a) or 6.2(b) is not capable of being satisfied;
(ii) a Change in Board Recommendation or a failure to make
the Recommendation occurs or the Board of Directors or any
committee thereof approves, endorses or recommends, or resolves
to or publicly proposes to approve, endorse or recommend, any
Alternative Proposal, including in any disclosure made pursuant
to
Rule 14d-9
or 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act; or
(iii) the condition set forth in Section 6.3(d) is not
capable of being satisfied by the End Date.
A-25
In the event of termination of this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 7.1, this Agreement shall terminate (except for the
provisions of Section 7.2 and Article VIII), and there
shall be no liability on the part of the Hiland Parties or the
Parent Parties to the other except as provided in
Section 7.2 and Article VIII and except that no such
termination shall relieve any party from liability arising out
of any willful breach of any of the representations, warranties
or covenants in this Agreement (subject to any express
limitations set forth in this Agreement), in which case the
aggrieved party shall be entitled to all rights and remedies
available at law or in equity.
Section 7.2 Reimbursement
of Certain Expenses.
(a) In the event that:
(i) (A) an Alternative Proposal shall have been made
known to the Hiland Parties or shall have been made directly to
the Unitholders generally or any person shall have publicly
announced an intention (whether or not conditional or withdrawn)
to make an Alternative Proposal and thereafter, (B) this
Agreement is terminated by the Hiland Parties or the Parent
Parties (as applicable) pursuant to Section 7.1(b)(i),
7.1(b)(iii) or 7.1(d)(i), and (C) a Hiland Group Entity
enters into a definitive agreement with respect to, or
consummates, a transaction contemplated by any Alternative
Proposal within twelve (12) months of the date this
Agreement is terminated; or
(ii) this Agreement is terminated by the Parent Parties
pursuant to Section 7.1(d)(ii);
then in any such event under clause (i) or (ii) of
this Section 7.2(a), the Partnership shall pay to Parent
all of the Expenses of the Parent Parties, provided that
in no event shall the Partnership be required to pay for
Expenses in any amount in excess of $1,100,000; provided
further, that no expense for which a Parent Party has
received reimbursement pursuant to the Holdings Agreement shall
be paid hereunder. As used herein, Expenses
shall mean all out-of-pocket fees and expenses (including all
fees and expenses of counsel, accountants, consultants,
financial advisors and investment bankers of Parent and its
Affiliates (other than the Hiland Group Entities)) incurred by
Parent and its Affiliates (other than the Hiland Group Entities)
or on their behalf in connection with or related to the
authorization, preparation, negotiation, execution and
performance of this Agreement and the Funding and all other
matters related to the Merger.
(b) Any payment required to be made pursuant to
Section 7.2(a) shall be made to Parent not later than two
(2) Business Days after delivery to the Partnership of an
itemization setting forth in reasonable detail all Expenses of
the Parent Parties for which payment pursuant to
Section 7.2(a) is sought (which itemization may be
supplemented and updated from time to time by Parent until the
sixtieth (60th) day after delivery of such notice of demand for
payment). All such payments shall be made by wire transfer of
immediately available funds to an account to be designated by
Parent.
(c) The Partnership acknowledges that the Expense
reimbursement and the other provisions of this Section 7.2
are an integral part of the Merger and that, without these
agreements, Parent would not enter into this Agreement.
ARTICLE VIII
Miscellaneous
Section 8.1 No
Survival of Representations and
Warranties. None of the representations and
warranties in this Agreement or in any instrument delivered
pursuant to this Agreement shall survive the Merger.
Section 8.2 Holdings
Merger. Parent hereby covenants and agrees
that it shall not close the Holdings Merger unless the Merger
has closed prior to or is closing concurrently with the Holdings
Merger; provided, however, that such restriction
shall not apply if this Agreement and the Merger shall have been
submitted to a vote of Unitholders and the outcome of such vote
shall not have constituted a Unitholder Approval.
Section 8.3 Expenses. Except
as set forth in Section 7.2, whether or not the Merger is
consummated, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with
the Merger, this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby shall be paid by the party incurring or required to incur
such expenses.
A-26
Section 8.4 Counterparts;
Effectiveness. This Agreement may be executed
in two or more counterparts (including by facsimile), each of
which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the
signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument, and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been
signed by each of the parties and delivered (by telecopy or
otherwise) to the other parties.
Section 8.5 Governing
Law. This Agreement, and all claims or causes
of action (whether at law, in contract or in tort) that may be
based upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement or the
negotiation, execution or performance hereof, shall be governed
by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Delaware, without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law
provision or rule (whether of the State of Delaware or any other
jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of
any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware.
Section 8.6 Specific
Performance; Jurisdiction; Enforcement. The
parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event
that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed
in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise
breached. It is accordingly agreed that prior to the termination
of this Agreement in accordance with Article VII the
parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to
prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically
the terms and provisions of this Agreement exclusively in the
Delaware Court of Chancery (or a proper Delaware state court if
the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction)
or the federal courts sitting in the State of Delaware, this
being in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled
at law or in equity. In connection with any request for specific
performance or equitable relief by any party hereto, each of the
other parties waive any requirement for the security or posting
of any bond in connection with such remedy. In addition, each of
the parties hereto irrevocably agrees that any legal action or
proceeding with respect to this Agreement and the rights and
obligations arising hereunder, or for recognition and
enforcement of any judgment in respect of this Agreement and the
rights and obligations arising hereunder brought by the other
party hereto or its successors or assigns, shall be brought and
determined exclusively in the Delaware Court of Chancery (or a
proper Delaware state court if the Court of Chancery does not
have subject matter jurisdiction) or the federal courts sitting
in the State of Delaware. Each of the parties hereto consents to
the service of process or other papers in connection with such
action or proceeding in the manner provided in Section 8.8
or in such other manner as permitted by Law. Each of the parties
hereto hereby irrevocably submits with regard to any such action
or proceeding for itself and in respect of its property,
generally and unconditionally, to the personal jurisdiction of
the aforesaid courts and agrees that it will not bring any
action relating to this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated hereby in any court other than the aforesaid
courts. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives, to
the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, and agrees not
to assert, by way of motion, as a defense, counterclaim or
otherwise, in any action or proceeding with respect to this
Agreement, (a) any claim that it is not personally subject
to the jurisdiction of the above named courts for any reason
other than the failure to serve in accordance with this
Section 8.6, (b) any claim that it or its property is
exempt or immune from jurisdiction of any such court or from any
legal process commenced in such courts (whether through service
of notice, attachment prior to judgment, attachment in aid of
execution of judgment, execution of judgment or otherwise) and
(c) any claim that (i) the suit, action or proceeding
in such court is brought in an inconvenient forum, (ii) the
venue of such suit, action or proceeding is improper or
(iii) this Agreement, or the subject matter hereof, may not
be enforced in or by such courts.
Section 8.7 WAIVER
OF JURY TRIAL. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO
IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY
LEGAL PROCEEDING BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED
HEREBY.
Section 8.8 Notices. Any
notice required to be given hereunder shall be sufficient if in
writing, and sent by facsimile transmission (provided that any
notice received by facsimile transmission or otherwise at the
addressees location on any Business Day after
5:00 p.m. (addressees local time) shall be deemed to
have been received at 9:00 a.m. (addressees local
time) on the next Business Day), by reliable overnight delivery
service (with proof of service), hand delivery or certified or
registered mail (return receipt requested and first-
A-27
class postage prepaid), addressed as follows:
To Parent or Merger Sub:
HH GP Holding, LLC
302 North Independence
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 242-4703
Attention: Harold Hamm
with copies to:
Baker Botts L.L.P.
910 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Facsimile:
(713) 229-1522
|
|
Attention: |
Joshua Davidson
|
Paul Perea
To Partnership GP or the Partnership:
Hiland Partners, LP
205 West Maple
Suite 1100
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 616-2080
Attention: Joseph L. Griffin
with copies to:
John T. McNabb, II
363 North Sam Houston Parkway East
Suite 550
Houston, TX 77060
Facsimile:
(281) 445-4298
and
Conner & Winters, LLP
4000 One Williams Center
Tulsa, OK 74172
Facsimile:
(918) 586-8625
Attention: Robert A. Curry
or to such other address as any party shall specify by written
notice so given, and such notice shall be deemed to have been
delivered as of the date so telecommunicated, personally
delivered or mailed. Any party to this Agreement may notify any
other party of any changes to the address or any of the other
details specified in this Section 8.8; provided,
however, that such notification shall only be effective
on the date specified in such notice or five (5) Business
Days after the notice is given, whichever is later. Rejection or
other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of
changed address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to
be receipt of the notice as of the date of such rejection,
refusal or inability to deliver.
Section 8.9 Assignment;
Binding Effect. Neither this Agreement nor
any of the rights, interests or obligations hereunder shall be
assigned by any of the parties hereto (whether by operation of
law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other
parties, except that, without written consent of any party
hereto, (i) Merger Sub may assign, in its sole discretion,
any of or all of its rights, interest and obligations under this
Agreement to Parent or to any direct or indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of Parent, (ii) Parent may assign any right to
receive a payment by the Partnership of Expenses to any
Affiliate of Parent, and (iii) Merger Sub
and/or
Parent may assign its rights hereunder as collateral security to
any lender to Merger Sub
and/or
Parent
A-28
or an Affiliate of Merger Sub
and/or
Parent, as the case may be, but, in each case, no such
assignment shall relieve Merger Sub
and/or
Parent, as applicable, of its obligations hereunder. Subject to
the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall be binding upon and
shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their
respective successors and assigns.
Section 8.10 Severability. Any
term or provision of this Agreement which is invalid or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that
jurisdiction, be ineffective only to the extent of such
invalidity or unenforceability without rendering invalid or
unenforceable such term or provision as to any other
jurisdiction or any of the remaining terms and provisions of
this Agreement in that or any other jurisdiction. If any
provision of this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable,
such provision shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is
enforceable.
Section 8.11 Entire
Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This
Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto)
constitutes the entire agreement, and supersedes all other prior
agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between
the parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter
hereof and thereof and, except as set forth in Section 5.9
and except for the rights of Unitholders whose Common Units
converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration
pursuant to Section 2.1 to receive such Merger
Consideration after the Effective Time, is not intended to and
shall not confer upon any person other than the parties hereto
any rights or remedies hereunder.
Section 8.12 Amendments;
Waivers. At any time prior to the Effective
Time, any provision of this Agreement may be amended or waived
if, and only if, such amendment or waiver is in writing and
signed, in the case of an amendment, by the Hiland Parties and
the Parent Parties, or in the case of a waiver, by the party
against whom the waiver is to be effective; provided,
however, that after receipt of Unitholder Approval, if
any such amendment or waiver shall by applicable Law or in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the NASDAQ Global
Select Market require further approval of the Unitholders of the
Partnership, the effectiveness of such amendment or waiver shall
be subject to the approval of the Unitholders of the
Partnership. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no failure or delay
by the Hiland Parties or the Parent Parties in exercising any
right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any
single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further
exercise of any other right hereunder.
Section 8.13 Headings;
Interpretation.
(a) Headings of the Articles and Sections of this Agreement
are for convenience of the parties only and shall be given no
substantive or interpretive effect whatsoever. The table of
contents to this Agreement is for reference purposes only and
shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement.
(b) When a reference is made in this Agreement to an
Article or Section, such reference shall be to an Article or
Section of this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. Whenever
the words include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words hereof,
herein and hereunder and words of
similar import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this
Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this
Agreement. The word or shall be deemed to mean
and/or. All terms defined in this Agreement shall
have the defined meanings when used in any certificate or other
document made or delivered pursuant thereto unless otherwise
defined therein. The definitions contained in this Agreement are
applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such
terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter
genders of such term. Any agreement, instrument or statute
defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or instrument
that is referred to herein means such agreement, instrument or
statute as from time to time amended, modified or supplemented,
including (in the case of agreements or instruments) by waiver
or consent and (in the case of statutes) by succession of
comparable successor statutes and references to all attachments
thereto and instruments incorporated therein. Each of the
parties has participated in the drafting and negotiation of this
Agreement. If an ambiguity or question of intent or
interpretation arises, this Agreement must be construed as if it
is drafted by all the parties, and no presumption or burden of
proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of
authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
References in this Agreement to specific laws or to specific
provisions of laws shall include all rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. Each party to this Agreement has or may
have set forth information in its respective disclosure schedule
in a
A-29
section of such disclosure corresponding to the applicable
sections of this Agreement to which such disclosure applies. The
fact that any item of information is disclosed in a disclosure
schedule to this Agreement shall not constitute an admission by
such party that such item is material, that such item has had or
would have a Hiland Material Adverse Effect or Parent Material
Adverse Effect, as applicable, or that the disclosure of such be
construed to mean that such information is required to be
disclosed by this Agreement.
Section 8.14 No
Recourse. This Agreement may only be enforced
against, and any claims or causes of action that may be based
upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement, or the
negotiation, execution or performance of this Agreement may only
be made against the entities that are expressly identified as
parties hereto and no past, present or future Affiliate,
director, officer, employee, incorporator, member, manager,
partner, stockholder, agent, attorney or representative of any
party hereto shall have any liability for any obligations or
liabilities of the parties to this Agreement or for any claim
based on, in respect of, or by reason of, the transactions
contemplated hereby.
Section 8.15 Certain
Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement,
the following terms will have the following meanings when used
herein:
(a) Affiliates means, with respect to
any Person, any other Person that directly or indirectly through
one or more intermediaries controls, is controlled by or is
under common control with, the Person in question. As used
herein, the term control means the possession,
direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the
direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether
through ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.
(b) Budget means the annual budget of
the Partnership for fiscal year 2009 and included in
Section 8.15(b) of the Hiland Disclosure Schedule.
(c) Business Day means any day other
than a Saturday, Sunday or a day on which the banks in New York
are authorized by law or executive order to be closed.
(d) Common Unit has the meaning set
forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(e) Confidentiality Agreement means the
form of confidentiality agreement in Exhibit A to
this Agreement.
(f) Conflicts Committee means a
committee of the Board of Directors composed entirely of two or
more directors who are not (a) security holders, officers
or employees of Partnership GP, (b) officers, directors or
employees of any Affiliate of Partnership GP or (c) holders
of any ownership interest in the Hiland Group Entities other
than Common Units and who also meet the independence standards
required of directors who serve on an audit committee of a board
of directors established by the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations of the SEC thereunder and by the national securities
exchange on which the Common Units are listed.
(g) Contracts means any contracts,
agreements, licenses, notes, bonds, mortgages, indentures,
commitments, leases or other instruments or obligations, whether
written or oral.
(h) Employee Benefit Plan means all
compensation or employee benefit plans, programs, policies,
agreements or other arrangements, whether or not employee
benefit plans (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of
ERISA, whether or not subject to ERISA), whether written or
oral, including but not limited to, those that provide cash or
equity-based incentives, health, medical, dental, disability,
accident or life insurance benefits or vacation, severance,
retirement, pension or savings benefits, that are sponsored,
maintained or contributed to by the Hiland Group Entities, or
that the Hiland Group Entities have any obligation to sponsor,
maintain or contribute to, for the benefit of current or former
employees, directors, independent contractors or consultants of
the Hiland Group Entities and all employee, consultant and
independent contractor agreements providing compensation,
vacation, severance or other benefits to any current or former
officer, employee, independent contractor or consultant of the
Hiland Group Entities, including Employment Agreements.
A-30
(i) Employment Agreement means all
agreements to which a Hiland Group Entity is a party that relate
to the employment or engagement, or arise from the past
employment or engagement, of any natural person by a Hiland
Group Entity, whether as an employee, nonemployee officer or
director, consultant or other independent contractor, sales
representative or distributor of any kind, including any
employee leasing or service agreement and any noncompetition
agreement.
(j) Encumbrances means pledges,
restrictions on transfer, proxies and voting or other
agreements, liens, claims, charges, mortgages, security
interests or other legal or equitable encumbrances, limitations
or restrictions of any nature whatsoever.
(k) Environmental Laws means any
applicable law (including common law) regulating or prohibiting
Releases of Hazardous Materials into any part of the workplace
or the environment, or pertaining to the protection of natural
resources, wildlife, the environment, or public or employee
health and safety including, without limitation, the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (42 U.S.C. Section 9601 et seq.), the
Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (49 U.S.C.
Section 5101 et seq.), the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq.), the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq.), the
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. Section 7401 et seq.), the
Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. Section 2601
et seq.), the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C.
Section 2701 et seq.), the Atomic Energy Act of 1954
(42 U.S.C. Section 2014 et seq.), the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C.
Section 136 et seq.), and the Occupational Safety and
Health Act (29 U.S.C. Section 651 et seq.) and the
regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, and any analogous
international treaties, national, provincial, state or local
statutes, and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, as
such laws have been amended as of the Closing Date.
(l) General Partner Interest has the
meaning set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(m) General Partner Unit has the meaning
set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(n) Governmental Entity means any
(a) multinational, federal, national, provincial,
territorial, state, regional, municipal, local or other
government, governmental or public department, central bank,
court, tribunal, arbitral body, commission, administrative
agency, board, bureau or agency, domestic or foreign,
(b) subdivision, agent, commission, board, or authority of
any of the foregoing, or (c) quasi-governmental or private
body exercising any regulatory, expropriation or taxing
authority under, or for the account of, any of the foregoing, in
each case, which has jurisdiction or authority with respect to
the applicable party.
(o) Hazardous Material means and
includes each substance defined, designated or classified as a
hazardous waste, hazardous substance, hazardous material,
pollutant, contaminant or toxic substance under any
Environmental Law, including petroleum, petroleum products,
propane by products, lead, mercury, asbestos or polychlorinated
byphenyls that have been Released into the environment.
(p) Hiland Material Adverse Effect means
any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence
that, individually or in the aggregate with all other facts,
circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences, has had
or would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect
on the assets, liabilities, properties, business, results of
operations or condition (financial or otherwise) of the
Partnership and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or on the
ability of the Hiland Parties to perform their obligations
hereunder or to consummate the Merger, but shall not include:
(a) facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or
occurrences (i) generally affecting the midstream oil and
gas or gathering and processing industries (including commodity
prices), (ii) generally affecting the economy or the
financial or securities markets in the United States or globally
(including interest rates), (iii) generally affecting
regulatory or political conditions in the United States or
globally, (iv) caused by compliance with the terms of this
Agreement (including omissions required by this Agreement),
(v) caused by the announcement or pendency of the Merger
(including litigation brought by any Unitholders of the
Partnership (on their own behalf or on behalf of the
Partnership) or loss of or adverse changes in relationships with
employees, customers or suppliers of the Partnership) or
(vi) caused by any action taken or omitted to be taken by
an officer of a Hiland Party at the direction of any of the
Parent Parties or Mr. Hamm (other than (A) in his
capacity as part of, (B) in accordance with authority
delegated to him by, or (C) as
A-31
otherwise authorized by, the Board of Directors or any committee
thereof); (b) changes in applicable Laws or GAAP after the
date hereof; (c) a decrease in the market price of the
Common Units; (d) any failure by the Hiland Parties to meet
any internal or publicly disclosed projections, forecasts or
estimates of revenue or earnings; (e) a Ratio Default; or
(f) any decrease in distributions in respect of the Common
Units; except, in the case of clauses (a)(i), (a)(ii) or
(a)(iii) of this definition, for any fact, circumstance, event,
change, effect or occurrence that affects the assets,
liabilities, properties, business, results of operations or
condition (financial or otherwise) of the Partnership and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in a disproportionately adverse
manner, compared to other participants in the midstream oil and
gas or gathering and processing industries, and except that
clauses (c), (d), (e) and (f) of this definition shall
not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any fact,
circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence underlying
such decrease, failure or default has resulted in, or
contributed to, a Hiland Material Adverse Effect.
(q) Hiland Operating Credit Agreement
means the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2005,
among Hiland Operating, LLC, the lenders party thereto and
MidFirst Bank, as administrative agent, together with any
related guarantees, in each case as amended, restated,
supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time.
(r) Holdings Credit Agreement means the
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2006, among
Holdings, the lenders party thereto and MidFirst Bank, as
administrative agent, together with any related guarantees, in
each case as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise
modified from time to time.
(s) Incentive Distribution Right has the
meaning set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(t) Knowledge or
knowledge means (i) with respect to
Parent, the knowledge of the individuals listed on
Section 8.15(t)(i) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule and
(ii) with respect to the Hiland Parties, the knowledge of
the individuals listed on Section 8.15(t)(ii) of the Hiland
Disclosure Schedule.
(u) Law or Laws means
all statutes, regulations, statutory rules, orders, judgments,
decrees and terms and conditions of any grant of approval,
permission, authority, permit or license of any court,
Governmental Entity, statutory body or self-regulatory authority
(including the NASDAQ Global Select Market).
(v) Limited Partner has the meaning set
forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(w) Orders or orders
means any orders, judgments, injunctions, awards, decrees or
writs handed down, adopted or imposed by, including any consent
decree, settlement agreement or similar written agreement with,
any Governmental Entity.
(x) organizational or governing
documents means, for a corporation, the certificate of
incorporation (or similarly-titled document of equivalent
effect) and bylaws; for a partnership, the certificate of
limited partnership (or similarly-titled document of equivalent
effect) and partnership agreement; for a limited liability
company, the certificate of formation (or similarly-titled
document of equivalent effect) and limited liability company
agreement; and for other business entities, certificates and
documents of equivalent effect.
(y) Outstanding has the meaning set
forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(z) Parent Material Adverse Effect means
any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence
that, individually or in the aggregate with all other facts,
circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences, prevents
or materially delays or materially impairs or would be
reasonably likely to prevent or materially delay or materially
impair the ability of Parent or Merger Sub to consummate the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby.
(aa) Partially Owned Entity means, with
respect to a specified person, any other person that is not a
Subsidiary of such specified person but in which such specified
person, directly or indirectly, owns less
A-32
than 100% of the equity interests thereof (whether voting or
non-voting and including beneficial interests).
(bb) Partnership Agreement means the
First Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the
Partnership, dated as of February 15, 2005, as amended by
Amendment No. 1, dated April 15, 2008, as it may be
further amended from time to time.
(cc) Partnership Interest has the
meaning set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(dd) Permitted Encumbrances means
(i) carriers, warehousemens, mechanics,
materialmens, repairmens or other like liens imposed
by law arising in the ordinary course of business which are not
overdue for a period of more than 60 days or which are
being contested in good faith by appropriate proceeding,
(ii) pledges or deposits in connection with workers
compensation, unemployment insurance and other social security
legislation and deposits securing liability to insurance
carriers under insurance or self-insurance arrangements,
(iii) liens, security interests, charges or other
encumbrances imposed by law for Taxes not yet due or which are
being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings
(provided that adequate reserves with respect thereto are
maintained on the books of such person or its subsidiaries, as
the case may be, in conformity with GAAP), (iv) deposits to
secure the performance of bids, trade contracts (other than for
borrowed money), leases, statutory obligations, surety and
appeal bonds, performance bonds and other obligations of a like
nature incurred in the ordinary course of business,
(v) easements, rights-of-way, restrictions and other
similar encumbrances incurred in the ordinary course of business
which, in the aggregate, do not materially interfere with the
ordinary conduct of the business by the relevant person and its
subsidiaries, (vi) liens, title defects, preferential
rights or other encumbrances created pursuant to construction,
operating and maintenance agreements, space lease agreements and
other similar agreements, in each case having ordinary and
customary terms and entered into in the ordinary course of
business by the relevant person and its subsidiaries,
(vii) liens on the assets of Hiland Operating, LLC and its
Subsidiaries securing the obligations of Hiland Operating, LLC
under the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement, (viii) liens
on the assets of Holdings and its Subsidiaries securing the
obligations of Holdings under the Holdings Credit Agreement and
(ix) Encumbrances set forth in the organizational or
governing documents of any of the Hiland Group Entities.
(ee) person or Person
means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, a limited
liability company, an association, a trust or any other entity,
group (as such term is used in Section 13 of the Exchange
Act) or organization, including a Governmental Entity, and any
permitted successors and assigns of such person.
(ff) Ratio Default means the failure, if
any, of Hiland Operating, LLC to be in compliance with
(i) the Interest Coverage Ratio required by
Section 6.17 of the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement or
(ii) the Leverage Ratio required by Section 6.18 of
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. For purposes of this
definition, Interest Coverage Ratio and
Leverage Ratio have the meanings assigned to them in
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
(gg) Release means any depositing,
spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, placing, burying, emitting,
discarding, abandoning, emptying, discharging, migrating,
injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping or disposing.
(hh) Remedial Work means any action
(including investigative, site monitoring, restoration,
abatement, detoxification, containment, handling, treatment,
removal, storage, decontamination,
clean-up,
transport, disposal or other ameliorative work, corrective
action or response action) necessary to remediate or respond to
a Release or the presence of any Hazardous Material.
(ii) Rollover Commitment means the
acknowledgement or commitment made by a Person listed on
Section 8.15(ii) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule in a
commitment letter or other support agreement executed as of the
date hereof in connection herewith.
(jj) Subordinated Unit has the meaning
set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
A-33
(kk) Subsidiaries of any person means
any corporation, partnership, association, trust or other form
of legal entity of which (i) more than 50% of the
outstanding voting securities are directly or indirectly owned
by such person, or (ii) such person or any Subsidiary of
such person is a general partner.
(ll) Tax or Taxes
means any taxes, assessments, fees and other governmental
charges imposed by any Governmental Entity, including income,
profits, gross receipts, net proceeds, alternative or add-on
minimum, ad valorem, value added, goods and services, turnover,
sales, use, property, personal property (tangible and
intangible), environmental, stamp, leasing, lease, user, excise,
duty, franchise, capital stock, transfer, registration, license,
withholding, social security (or similar), unemployment,
disability, payroll, employment, fuel, excess profits,
occupational, premium, windfall profit, severance, estimated, or
other charge of any kind whatsoever, including any interest,
penalty, or addition thereto, whether disputed or not.
(mm) Tax Return means any return,
declaration, report, election, designation, notice, claim for
refund, or information return or statement relating to Taxes,
including any schedule or attachment thereto, and including any
amendment thereof.
(nn) Unit means any class or series of
equity interest in the Partnership (but excluding any options,
rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to an equity
interest in the Partnership) designated as a Unit,
which shall include Common Units and Subordinated Units but does
not include (i) General Partner Units (or the General
Partner Interest represented thereby) or (ii) Incentive
Distribution Rights.
(oo) Unitholder means the holder of a
Unit.
(pp) Unitholder Approval means approval
of at least a majority of the Outstanding Common Units
(excluding Common Units owned by Partnership GP and its
Affiliates (including Holdings)) voting as a class and at least
a majority of the Outstanding Subordinated Units voting as a
class.
(qq) Each of the following terms is defined in the Section
set forth opposite such term:
|
|
|
Agreement
|
|
Preamble
|
Alternative Proposal
|
|
Section 5.3(g)
|
Board of Directors
|
|
Recitals
|
Book-Entry Common Units
|
|
Section 2.2(a)
|
Cap Amount
|
|
Section 5.9(c)
|
Certificate of Merger
|
|
Section 1.3
|
Certificates
|
|
Section 2.2(a)
|
Change in Board Recommendation
|
|
Section 5.3(d)
|
Closing
|
|
Section 1.2
|
Closing Date
|
|
Section 1.2
|
Code
|
|
Section 2.2(b)(iii)
|
Continental Gas
|
|
Section 4.3
|
D&O Insurance
|
|
Section 5.9(b)
|
DLLCA
|
|
Section 1.1
|
DRULPA
|
|
Section 1.1
|
Effective Time
|
|
Section 1.3
|
Employees
|
|
Section 3.13
|
End Date
|
|
Section 7.1(b)(i)
|
ERISA
|
|
Section 3.8(a)
|
ERISA Affiliate
|
|
Section 3.8(a)
|
Exchange Act
|
|
Section 3.4(a)
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
Section 2.2(a)
|
Execution Date
|
|
Section 3.2(b)
|
Expenses
|
|
Section 7.2(a)
|
A-34
|
|
|
Funding
|
|
Section 4.4
|
Funding Commitments
|
|
Section 4.4
|
GAAP
|
|
Section 3.4(c)
|
Hiland D&O Indemnified Parties
|
|
Section 5.9(a)
|
Hiland Disclosure Schedule
|
|
Article III
|
Hiland Financial Statements
|
|
Section 3.4(c)
|
Hiland Group Entities
|
|
Section 3.1(a)
|
Hiland LTIP
|
|
Section 2.1(a)
|
Hiland Parties
|
|
Preamble
|
Hiland SEC Documents
|
|
Section 3.4(a)
|
Holdings
|
|
Recitals
|
Holdings Agreement
|
|
Recitals
|
Holdings GP
|
|
Recitals
|
Holdings Merger
|
|
Recitals
|
HPGP Merger Sub
|
|
Recitals
|
HSR Act
|
|
Section 5.6(b)
|
Letter of Transmittal
|
|
Section 2.2(b)(i)
|
Material Contracts
|
|
Section 3.17(a)
|
Merger
|
|
Recitals
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
Section 2.1(a)
|
Merger Sub
|
|
Preamble
|
Merger Sub LLC Interests
|
|
Section 1.6
|
Merger Sub LLC Units
|
|
Section 1.6
|
Parent
|
|
Preamble
|
Parent Disclosure Schedule
|
|
Article IV
|
Parent Parties
|
|
Preamble
|
Partnership
|
|
Preamble
|
Partnership GP
|
|
Preamble
|
Partnership Meeting
|
|
Section 5.4(b)
|
Paying Agent
|
|
Section 2.2(a)
|
Proxy Statement
|
|
Section 3.11
|
Recommendation
|
|
Section 3.16
|
Regulatory Law
|
|
Section 5.6(d)
|
Representatives
|
|
Section 5.3(a)
|
rights-of-way
|
|
Section 3.14(b)
|
Rollover Interests
|
|
Section 2.1(b)
|
Rollover Parties
|
|
Section 2.1(b)
|
Schedule 13E-3
|
|
Section 3.11
|
SEC
|
|
Section 3.4(a)
|
Securities Act
|
|
Section 3.2(f)
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
Section 5.3(h)
|
Support Agreement
|
|
Recitals
|
Surviving Entity
|
|
Section 1.1
|
Trusts
|
|
Section 4.3
|
A-35
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed and delivered on the date first
above written.
HH GP HOLDING, LLC
Harold Hamm
President
HLND MERGERCO, LLC
Harold Hamm
President
HILAND PARTNERS GP, LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
L. Griffin
|
Joseph L. Griffin
Chief Executive Officer and President
HILAND PARTNERS, LP
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Hiland Partners GP, LLC,
|
its General Partner
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
L. Griffin
|
Joseph L. Griffin
Chief Executive Officer and President
Signature
Page to Agreement and Plan of Merger
A-36
Annex B
SUPPORT
AGREEMENT
(HLND Units)
This SUPPORT AGREEMENT, dated as of June 1, 2009 (this
Agreement), is entered into among HH GP
Holding, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company
(Parent), HLND MergerCo, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and a subsidiary of Parent
(Merger Sub and, together with Parent, the
Parent Parties), Hiland Partners GP, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and the general partner of
the Partnership (Partnership GP), Hiland
Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the
Partnership and, together with Partnership
GP, the Hiland Parties), Hiland Partners GP
Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the
general partner of Holdings (Holdings GP),
and Hiland Holdings GP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
(Holdings and, together with Holdings GP, the
Holdings Parties). Each of the Parent
Parties, the Hiland Parties and the Holdings Parties are
referred to herein individually as a Party, and they
are referred to herein collectively as the Parties.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement,
the Parent Parties and the Hiland Parties have entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger, as it may be amended, supplemented
or otherwise modified from time to time (the Merger
Agreement), which provides, among other things, for
the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Partnership, upon the
terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein;
WHEREAS, Holdings is the record and Beneficial Owner of, and has
the right to vote and dispose of, that number of Units set forth
next to Holdings name on Schedule A
hereto; and
WHEREAS, as an inducement to the Parent Parties and the Hiland
Parties entering into the Merger Agreement and incurring the
obligations therein, the Parent Parties and the Hiland Parties
have required that the Holdings Parties enter into this
Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally
bound, agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
Certain
Definitions
Section 1.1 Defined
Terms. Terms used in this Agreement and not
defined herein have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
Merger Agreement.
Section 1.2 Other
Definitions. For the purposes of this
Agreement:
(a) Beneficially Own or
Beneficial Ownership with respect to any
securities means having beneficial ownership of such
securities (as determined pursuant to
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act), including pursuant to any agreement,
arrangement or understanding, whether or not in writing. Without
duplicative counting of the same securities by the same holder,
securities Beneficially Owned by a Person include securities
Beneficially Owned by all Affiliates of such Person and all
other Persons with whom such Person would constitute a
group within the meaning of Section 13(d) of
the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder.
(b) Expiration Time has the meaning set
forth in Section 2.1.
(c) Holdings Conflicts Committee means
the conflicts committee of the board of directors of Holdings GP.
(d) Owned Units has the meaning set
forth in Section 2.1 as supplemented by Section 2.2.
(e) Partnership Conflicts Committee
means the conflicts committee of the board of directors of
Partnership GP.
B-1
(f) Transfer means, with respect to a
security, the sale, grant, assignment, transfer, pledge,
encumbrance, hypothecation or other disposition of such security
or the Beneficial Ownership thereof (including by operation of
Law), or the entry into any Contract to effect any of the
foregoing, including, for purposes of this Agreement, the
transfer or sharing of any voting power of such security or
other rights in or of such security, the granting of any proxy
with respect to such security, depositing such security into a
voting trust or entering into a voting agreement with respect to
such security. As a verb, Transfer shall have a
correlative meaning.
(g) Units has the meaning ascribed
thereto in the Merger Agreement, and will also include for
purposes of this Agreement all Partnership Interests into which
Units may be split, combined, merged, consolidated, reorganized,
reclassified, recapitalized or otherwise converted and any
rights and benefits arising therefrom, including any dividends
or distributions of Partnership Interests or other equity
securities which may be declared in respect of the Units and
entitled to vote in respect of the matters contemplated by
Article II.
ARTICLE II
Agreement to
Vote
Section 2.1 Agreement
to Vote. Subject to the terms and conditions
hereof, Holdings irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that
from and after the date hereof and until the earliest to occur
of (i) the Effective Time; (ii) the termination of the
Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms; (iii) the
written agreement of the Parent Parties, the Hiland Parties
(with respect to Partnership GP, acting through the Partnership
Conflicts Committee) and the Holdings Parties (with respect to
Holdings GP, acting through the Holdings Conflicts Committee) to
terminate this Agreement; and (iv) the termination of the
merger agreement, dated as of June 1, 2009, by and among
Parent, HPGP MergerCo, LLC, Holdings GP and Holdings (the
HPGP Merger Agreement), in accordance with its
terms, (such earliest occurrence being the Expiration
Time); provided, however, that if the
HPGP Merger Agreement and the Merger (as defined in the HPGP
Merger Agreement) shall have been submitted to a vote of
Holdings Unitholders and the outcome of such vote shall
not have constituted a Unitholder Approval (as defined in the
HPGP Merger Agreement), the termination of the HPGP Merger
Agreement shall not result in the occurrence of the Expiration
Time, at any meeting (including each adjourned or postponed
meeting) of the Partnerships Unitholders, however called,
or in any other circumstances (including any sought action by
written consent) upon which a vote or other consent or approval
is sought (any such meeting or other circumstance, a
Unitholders Meeting), Holdings will
(A) appear at such Unitholders Meeting or otherwise
cause the Units Beneficially Owned by Holdings as of the
relevant time (Owned Units) to be counted as
present thereat for purposes of calculating a quorum and respond
to any other request by the Hiland Parties for written consent,
if any, and, (B) vote, or cause to be voted, all of its
Owned Units (1) in favor of the adoption and approval of
the Merger Agreement (whether or not recommended by Partnership
GPs Board of Directors or any committee thereof) and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger,
(2) in favor of the approval of any other matter to be
approved by the Unitholders of the Partnership (including,
without limitation, an adjournment of the Unitholders
Meeting) to facilitate the transactions contemplated by the
Merger Agreement, including the Merger, (3) against any
Alternative Proposal or any transaction contemplated by such
Alternative Proposal, (4) against any proposal made in
opposition to, or in competition or inconsistent with, the
Merger Agreement or the Merger, including the adoption thereof
or the consummation thereof, (5) against any extraordinary
dividend, distribution or recapitalization by the Partnership or
change in the capital structure of the Partnership (other than
pursuant to or as explicitly permitted by the Merger Agreement),
and (6) against any action or agreement that would
reasonably be expected to (a) result in a breach of any
representation, warranty or covenant of the Hiland Parties under
the Merger Agreement or (b) interfere with, delay or
attempt to discourage the Merger or the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
Section 2.2 Additional
Units. The Holdings Parties hereby agree,
while this Agreement is in effect, promptly to notify the Parent
Parties and the Hiland Parties of the number of any new Units or
any new restricted units, phantom units or unit options of the
Partnership (collectively, Derivative Units)
with respect to which Beneficial Ownership is acquired by
Holdings, if any, after the date hereof and before the
Expiration
B-2
Time. Any such Partnership Interests shall automatically become
subject to the terms of this Agreement as Owned Units as though
Beneficially Owned by Holdings as of the date hereof.
Section 2.3 Restrictions
on Transfer, Etc. Except as provided for
herein, the Holdings Parties agree, from the date hereof until
the Expiration Time, not to (i) directly or indirectly
Transfer or offer to Transfer any Owned Units; (ii) tender
any Owned Units into any tender or exchange offer or otherwise;
or (iii) otherwise restrict the ability of the Holdings
Parties freely to exercise all voting rights with respect to the
Owned Units. Any action attempted to be taken in violation of
the preceding sentence will be null and void. The Holdings
Parties further agree to authorize and hereby authorize the
Parent Parties and the Partnership to notify the
Partnerships transfer agent that there is a stop transfer
order with respect to all of the Owned Units and that this
Agreement places limits on the voting of the Owned Units.
Section 2.4 Proxy. The
Holdings Parties hereby revoke any and all previous proxies
granted with respect to the Owned Units. By entering into this
Agreement, the Holdings Parties hereby grant a proxy appointing
Parent, with full power of substitution, as the Holdings
Parties attorney-in-fact and proxy, for and in the
Holdings Parties names, to be counted as present and to
vote or otherwise to act on behalf of Holdings with respect to
the Owned Units solely with respect to the matters set forth in,
and in accordance with Section 2.1. The proxy granted by
the Holdings Parties pursuant to this Section 2.4 is,
subject to the penultimate sentence of this Section 2.4,
irrevocable and is coupled with an interest and is granted in
order to secure the Holdings Parties performance under
this Agreement and also in consideration of Parent and Merger
Sub entering into this Agreement and the Merger Agreement. The
proxy granted by the Holdings Parties shall be automatically
revoked upon termination of this Agreement in accordance with
its terms. The Holdings Parties agree, from the date hereof
until the Expiration Time, not to attempt to revoke, frustrate
the exercise of, or challenge the validity of, the irrevocable
proxy granted pursuant to this Section 2.4.
ARTICLE III
Representations
and Warranties
Section 3.1 Representations
and Warranties of Holdings Parties. The
Holdings Parties, jointly and severally, represent and warrant
to both the Parent Parties and the Hiland Parties as of the date
of this Agreement and at all times during the term of this
Agreement, as follows:
(a) Each of the Holdings Parties has all requisite limited
liability company or partnership power and authority to enter
into this Agreement, to carry out its obligations hereunder and
to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The
execution, delivery and performance by each Holdings Party of
this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all requisite
limited liability company or partnership action on the part of
such Holdings Party. No representation or warranty is made
concerning whether the consent of Holdings GP, to the extent
reserved to Parent pursuant to Section 7.1(d) of the
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Holdings GP, was validly adopted by Parent. This Agreement has
been duly executed and delivered by each Holdings Party and,
assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery hereof by
both the Parent Parties and the Hiland Parties, constitutes a
legal, valid and binding agreement of such Holdings Party,
enforceable against such Holdings Party in accordance with its
terms (except insofar as such enforceability may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization,
moratorium and similar laws relating to or affecting
creditors rights generally and by general principles of
equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered
in a proceeding in equity or at law)).
(b) Except for matters expressly contemplated by this
Agreement, neither the execution and delivery by the Holdings
Parties of this Agreement, nor the consummation by the Holdings
Parties of the transactions contemplated hereby and the
performance by the Holdings Parties of this Agreement will
(i) violate or conflict with any provision of the
organizational or governing documents of the Holdings Parties;
(ii) other than pursuant to Sections 13(d) and 16 of
the Exchange Act, require any consent, approval, authorization
or permit of, registration, declaration or filing with, or
notification to, any Governmental Entity or any other person;
(iii) result in any breach of or constitute a default (or
an event that, with notice or lapse of time or both, would
become a default) under, or give to others any right of
B-3
termination, cancellation, amendment or acceleration of any
obligation or the loss of any benefit under any agreement or
instrument to which any of the Holdings Parties is a party or by
or to which any of their properties are bound; (iv) result
in the creation of an Encumbrance upon any of the assets of any
of the Holdings Parties; or (v) violate or conflict with
any Law applicable to the Holdings Parties.
(c) Holdings GP is the sole general partner of Holdings.
Holdings GP is the record and Beneficial Owner of the 0%
non-economic general partner interest in Holdings and such
general partner interest has been duly authorized and validly
issued in accordance with applicable Laws and the Amended and
Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Holdings. Holdings
GP owns all of the general partner interest in Holdings free and
clear of any Encumbrances, except pursuant to the organizational
or governing documents of any of the Holdings Parties or the
Hiland Parties.
(d) Holdings is the record and Beneficial Owner of the
number of Common Units and Subordinated Units of the Partnership
constituting Owned Units as of the date hereof as set forth next
to Holdings name on Schedule A of this
Agreement. Holdings owns the Owned Units free and clear of any
Encumbrances, except pursuant to the organizational or governing
documents of any of the Holding Parties or the Hiland Parties,
and has the full legal right, power and authority to vote all of
the Owned Units without the consent or approval of, or any other
action on the part of any other Person (other than Holdings GP),
and has not granted any proxy inconsistent with this Agreement
that is still effective or entered into any voting or similar
agreement with respect to, the Owned Units, in each case, except
as provided in this Agreement.
(e) The Owned Units set forth next to Holdings name
on Schedule A hereto constitute all of the
Partnership Interests of the Partnership that are Beneficially
Owned by Holdings as of the date hereof, and, except for the
Owned Units and except pursuant to the organizational or
governing documents of any of the Holding Parties or the Hiland
Parties, Holdings does not Beneficially Own or have any right to
acquire (whether currently, upon lapse of time, following the
satisfaction of any conditions, upon the occurrence of any event
or any combination of the foregoing) any Units or any Derivative
Units.
(f) Except for the representations and warranties contained
in this Section 3.1 and except as otherwise expressly set
forth in this Agreement or in the agreements or certificates
entered into in connection herewith or contemplated hereby
(including, without limitation, the HPGP Merger Agreement), none
of the Holdings Parties nor any other Person on behalf of the
Holdings Parties makes any other representation or warranty of
any kind or nature, express or implied, in connection with this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 3.2 Representations
and Warranties of Parent Parties. The Parent
Parties, jointly and severally, represent and warrant to both
the Holdings Parties and the Hiland Parties as of the date of
this Agreement and at all times during the term of this
Agreement, as follows:
(a) Each of the Parent Parties has all requisite limited
liability company power and authority to enter into this
Agreement, to carry out its obligations hereunder and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution,
delivery and performance by each Parent Party of this Agreement
and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
have been duly authorized by all requisite limited liability
company action on the part of such Parent Party. This Agreement
has been duly executed and delivered by each Parent Party and,
assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery hereof by
both the Holdings Parties and the Hiland Parties, constitutes a
legal, valid and binding agreement of such Parent Party,
enforceable against such Parent Party in accordance with its
terms (except insofar as such enforceability may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization,
moratorium and similar laws relating to or affecting
creditors rights generally and by general principles of
equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered
in a proceeding in equity or at law)).
(b) Except for matters expressly contemplated by this
Agreement, neither the execution and delivery by the Parent
Parties of this Agreement, nor the consummation by the Parent
Parties of the transactions contemplated hereby and the
performance by the Parent Parties of this Agreement will
(i) violate or conflict with any provision of the
organizational or governing documents of the Parent Parties;
(ii) other
B-4
than pursuant to Sections 13(d) and 16 of the Exchange Act,
require any consent, approval, authorization or permit of,
registration, declaration or filing with, or notification to,
any Governmental Entity or any other person; (iii) result
in any breach of or constitute a default (or an event that, with
notice or lapse of time or both, would become a default) under,
or give to others any right of termination, cancellation,
amendment or acceleration of any obligation or the loss of any
benefit under any agreement or instrument to which any of the
Parent Parties is a party or by or to which any of their
properties are bound; (iv) result in the creation of an
Encumbrance upon any of the assets of any of the Parent Parties;
or (v) violate or conflict with any Law applicable to the
Parent Parties.
(c) Except for the representations and warranties contained
in this Section 3.2 and except as otherwise expressly set
forth in this Agreement or in the agreements or certificates
entered into in connection herewith or contemplated hereby
(including, without limitation, the Merger Agreement), none of
the Parent Parties nor any other Person on behalf of the Parent
Parties makes any other representation or warranty of any kind
or nature, express or implied, in connection with this Agreement
or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 3.3 Representations
and Warranties of Hiland Parties. The Hiland
Parties, jointly and severally, represent and warrant to both
the Holdings Parties and the Parent Parties as of the date of
this Agreement and at all times during the term of this
Agreement, as follows:
(a) Each of the Hiland Parties has all requisite limited
liability company or partnership power and authority to enter
into this Agreement, to carry out its obligations hereunder and
to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The
execution, delivery and performance by each Hiland Party of this
Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby have been duly authorized by all requisite limited
liability company or partnership action on the part of such
Hiland Party. This Agreement has been duly executed and
delivered by each Hiland Party and, assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery hereof by both the
Holdings Parties and the Parent Parties, constitutes a legal,
valid and binding agreement of such Hiland Party, enforceable
against such Hiland Party in accordance with its terms (except
insofar as such enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy,
insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and
similar laws relating to or affecting creditors rights
generally and by general principles of equity (regardless of
whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in
equity or at law)).
(b) Except for matters expressly contemplated by this
Agreement, neither the execution and delivery by the Hiland
Parties of this Agreement, nor the consummation by the Hiland
Parties of the transactions contemplated hereby and the
performance by the Hiland Parties of this Agreement will
(i) violate or conflict with any provision of the
organizational or governing documents of the Hiland Parties;
(ii) require any consent, approval, authorization or permit
of, registration, declaration or filing with, or notification
to, any Governmental Entity or any other person;
(iii) result in any breach of or constitute a default (or
an event that, with notice or lapse of time or both, would
become a default) under, or give to others any right of
termination, cancellation, amendment or acceleration of any
obligation or the loss of any benefit under any agreement or
instrument to which any of the Hiland Parties is a party or by
or to which any of their properties are bound; (iv) result
in the creation of an Encumbrance upon any of the assets of any
of the Hiland Parties; or (v) violate or conflict with any
Law applicable to the Hiland Parties.
(c) Except for the representations and warranties contained
in this Section 3.3 and except as otherwise expressly set
forth in this Agreement or in the agreements or certificates
entered into in connection herewith or contemplated hereby
(including, without limitation, the Merger Agreement), none of
the Hiland Parties nor any other Person on behalf of the Hiland
Parties makes any other representation or warranty of any kind
or nature, express or implied, in connection with this Agreement
or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
B-5
ARTICLE IV
Additional
Covenants of Holdings
Section 4.1 Rollover
of Partnership Interests. The Holdings
Parties agree and acknowledge that in the Merger, (a) the
Common Units of which Holdings is the record and Beneficial
Owner will remain outstanding as Common Units of the Surviving
Entity and will not be converted into the right to receive the
Merger Consideration or entitled to any other form of
consideration, and (b) the Subordinated Units of which
Holdings is the record and Beneficial Owner will remain
outstanding as Subordinated Units of the Surviving Entity.
Section 4.2 Non-Interference;
Further Assurances. The Holdings Parties
agree that, prior to the termination of this Agreement, no
Holdings Party shall take any action that would make any
representation or warranty of such Holdings Party contained
herein untrue or incorrect or have the effect of preventing,
impeding, interfering with or adversely affecting the
performance by such Holdings Party of its obligations under this
Agreement; provided, however, that this
restriction shall not in any way restrict or limit the Holdings
Parties right to terminate the HPGP Merger Agreement in
accordance with its terms or obligate the Holdings Parties to
waive any conditions set forth in the HPGP Merger Agreement. The
Holdings Parties agree, without further consideration, to
execute and deliver such additional documents and to take such
further actions as are necessary or reasonably requested by the
Parent Parties or the Hiland Parties to confirm and assure the
rights and obligations set forth in this Agreement or to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE V
Termination
Section 5.1 Termination. This
Agreement shall terminate without further action at the
Expiration Time.
Section 5.2 Effect
of Termination. Upon termination of this
Agreement, the rights and obligations of all the parties will
terminate and become void without further action by any party
except for the provisions of Section 5.1, this
Section 5.2 and Article VI, which will survive such
termination. For the avoidance of doubt, the termination of this
Agreement shall not relieve any party of liability for any
willful breach of this Agreement prior to the time of
termination, in which case the aggrieved party shall be entitled
to all rights and remedies available at law or in equity.
ARTICLE VI
General
Section 6.1 Survival
of Representations and Warranties. None of
the representations and warranties in this Agreement shall
survive the Expiration Time.
Section 6.2 Expenses. All
costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement
and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the
party incurring or required to incur such expenses.
Section 6.3 Counterparts;
Effectiveness. This Agreement may be executed
in two or more counterparts (including by facsimile), each of
which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the
signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument, and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been
signed by each of the parties and delivered (by telecopy or
otherwise) to the other parties.
Section 6.4 Governing
Law. This Agreement, and all claims or causes
of action (whether at law or in equity, in contract or in tort)
that may be based upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement
or the negotiation, execution or performance hereof, shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice or
conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of
Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the
application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State
of Delaware. Each of the parties hereto agrees (a) that
this Agreement involves at least
B-6
$100,000.00, and (b) that this Agreement has been entered
into by the parties hereto in express reliance upon 6 Del.
C. § 2708.
Section 6.5 Specific
Performance; Jurisdiction; Enforcement. The
parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event
that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed
in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise
breached. It is accordingly agreed that prior to the termination
of this Agreement in accordance with Article V the parties
shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent
breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms
and provisions of this Agreement exclusively in the Delaware
Court of Chancery (or a proper Delaware state court if the Court
of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction) or the
federal courts sitting in the State of Delaware, this being in
addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law
or in equity. In connection with any request for specific
performance or equitable relief by any party hereto, each of the
other parties waive any requirement for the security or posting
of any bond in connection with such remedy. In addition, each of
the parties hereto irrevocably agrees that any Legal Action or
proceeding with respect to this Agreement and the rights and
obligations arising hereunder, or for recognition and
enforcement of any judgment in respect of this Agreement and the
rights and obligations arising hereunder brought by the other
party hereto or its successors or assigns, shall be brought and
determined exclusively in the Delaware Court of Chancery (or a
proper Delaware state court if the Court of Chancery does not
have subject matter jurisdiction) or the federal courts sitting
in the State of Delaware. Each of the parties hereto consents to
the service of process or other papers in connection with such
action or proceeding in the manner provided in Section 6.7
or in such other manner as permitted by Law and, to the extent
such party is not otherwise subject to service of process in the
State of Delaware, to appoint and maintain an agent in the State
of Delaware as such partys agent for acceptance of legal
process and notify the other party or parties hereto of the name
and address of such agent, and that service of process may, to
the fullest extent permitted by law, also be made on such party
by prepaid certified mail with a proof of mailing receipt
validated by the United States Postal Service constituting
evidence of valid service, and that service made pursuant to the
above shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, have the
same legal force and effect as if served upon such party
personally within the State of Delaware. Each of the parties
hereto hereby irrevocably submits with regard to any such action
or proceeding for itself and in respect of its property,
generally and unconditionally, to the personal jurisdiction of
the aforesaid courts and agrees that it will not bring any
action relating to this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated hereby in any court other than the aforesaid
courts. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives, to
the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, and agrees not
to assert, by way of motion, as a defense, counterclaim or
otherwise, in any action or proceeding with respect to this
Agreement, (a) any claim that it is not personally subject
to the jurisdiction of the above named courts for any reason
other than the failure to serve in accordance with this
Section 6.5, (b) any claim that it or its property is
exempt or immune from jurisdiction of any such court or from any
legal process commenced in such courts (whether through service
of notice, attachment prior to judgment, attachment in aid of
execution of judgment, execution of judgment or otherwise) and
(c) any claim that (i) the suit, action or proceeding
in such court is brought in an inconvenient forum, (ii) the
venue of such suit, action or proceeding is improper or
(iii) this Agreement, or the subject matter hereof, may not
be enforced in or by such courts. For purposes of implementing
the parties agreement to appoint and maintain an agent for
service of process in the State of Delaware, each such party
that has not as of the date hereof already duly appointed such
an agent does hereby appoint The Corporation Trust Company,
Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington,
Delaware 19801, as such agent.
Section 6.6 WAIVER
OF JURY TRIAL. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO
IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY
LEGAL PROCEEDING BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED
HEREBY.
Section 6.7 Notices. Any
notice required to be given hereunder shall be sufficient if in
writing, and sent by facsimile transmission (provided that any
notice received by facsimile transmission or otherwise at the
addressees location on any Business Day after
5:00 p.m. (addressees local time) shall be deemed to
have been received at 9:00 a.m. (addressees local
time) on the next Business Day), by reliable overnight delivery
B-7
service (with proof of service), hand delivery or certified or
registered mail (return receipt requested and first-class
postage prepaid), addressed as follows:
To the Parent Parties:
HH GP Holding, LLC
302 North Independence
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 242-4703
Attention: Harold Hamm
with copies to:
Baker Botts L.L.P.
910 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Facsimile:
(713) 229-1522
|
|
|
|
Attention:
|
Joshua Davidson
|
Paul Perea
To the Hiland Parties:
Hiland Partners, GP
205 West Maple
Suite 1100
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 616-2080
Attention: Joseph L. Griffin
with copies to:
John T. McNabb, II
363 North Sam Houston Parkway East
Suite 550
Houston, TX 77060
Facsimile:
(281) 445-4298
and
Conner & Winters, LLP
4000 One Williams Center
Tulsa, OK 74172
Facsimile:
(918) 586-8625
Attention: Robert A. Curry
B-8
To the Holdings Parties:
Hiland Holdings GP, LP
205 West Maple
Suite 1100
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 616-2080
Attention: Joseph L. Griffin
with copies to:
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
2200 Ross Avenue
Suite 2800
Dallas, TX 75201
Facsimile:
(214) 855-8000
|
|
|
|
Attention:
|
Kenneth L. Stewart
|
Bryn A. Sappington
or to such other address as any Party shall specify by written
notice so given, and such notice shall be deemed to have been
delivered as of the date so telecommunicated, personally
delivered or mailed. Any party to this Agreement may notify any
other party of any changes to the address or any of the other
details specified in this paragraph; provided,
however, that such notification shall only be effective
on the date specified in such notice or five (5) Business
Days after the notice is given, whichever is later. Rejection or
other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of
changed address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to
be receipt of the notice as of the date of such rejection,
refusal or inability to deliver.
Section 6.8 Assignment. Neither
this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations
hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties hereto
(whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior
written consent of the other parties. Subject to the preceding
sentence, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns.
Section 6.9 Severability. Any
term or provision of this Agreement which is invalid or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that
jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or
unenforceability without rendering invalid or unenforceable the
remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement in any other
jurisdiction. If any provision of this Agreement is so broad as
to be unenforceable, such provision shall be interpreted to be
only so broad as is enforceable.
Section 6.10 Entire
Agreement; No Third Party Beneficiaries. This
Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto)
constitutes the entire agreement, and supersedes all other prior
agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between
the parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter
hereof and is not intended to and shall not confer upon any
person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies
hereunder.
Section 6.11 Amendments. This
Agreement may not be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified
except by the express written agreement signed by all of the
parties (with respect to Holdings GP, acting through the
Holdings Conflicts Committee and with respect to Partnership GP,
acting through the Partnership Conflicts Committee) to this
Agreement.
Section 6.12 Extension;
Waiver. At any time prior to the Expiration
Time, by mutual agreement of any two of the Parent Parties, the
Hiland Parties (with respect to Partnership GP, acting through
the Partnership Conflicts Committee) and the Holdings Parties
(with respect to Holdings GP, acting through the Holdings
Conflicts Committee), such Parties may (i) extend the time
for the performance of any of the obligations of the third
Party, (ii) waive any inaccuracies in the representations
and warranties of the third Party contained in this Agreement or
in any document delivered under this Agreement or
(iii) waive compliance with any of the covenants or
conditions of the third Party contained in this Agreement. Any
agreement on the part of such Parties to any extension or waiver
will be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing
signed by such
B-9
Parties. The failure of any Party to assert any of its rights
under this Agreement or otherwise will not constitute a waiver
of such rights.
Section 6.13 Headings. Headings
of the Articles and Sections of this Agreement are for
convenience of the parties only and shall be given no
substantive or interpretive effect whatsoever. The table of
contents to this Agreement is for reference purposes only and
shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement.
Section 6.14 Interpretation. When
a reference is made in this Agreement to an Article or Section,
such reference shall be to an Article or Section of this
Agreement unless otherwise indicated. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words hereof,
herein and hereunder and words of
similar import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this
Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this
Agreement. The word or shall be deemed to mean
and/or. All terms defined in this Agreement shall
have the defined meanings when used in any certificate or other
document made or delivered pursuant thereto unless otherwise
defined therein. The definitions contained in this Agreement are
applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such
terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter
genders of such term. Any agreement, instrument or statute
defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or instrument
that is referred to herein means such agreement, instrument or
statute as from time to time amended, modified or supplemented,
including (in the case of agreements or instruments) by waiver
or consent and (in the case of statutes) by succession of
comparable successor statutes and references to all attachments
thereto and instruments incorporated therein. Each of the
parties has participated in the drafting and negotiation of this
Agreement. If an ambiguity or question of intent or
interpretation arises, this Agreement must be construed as if it
is drafted by all the parties, and no presumption or burden of
proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of
authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement. Any
statute defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or
instrument referred to herein shall mean such statute as from
time to time amended, modified or supplemented, including by
succession of comparable successor statutes.
Section 6.15 No
Recourse. This Agreement may only be enforced
against, and any claims or causes of action that may be based
upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement, or the
negotiation, execution or performance of this Agreement may only
be made against the entities that are expressly identified as
parties hereto and no past, present or future Affiliate,
director, officer, employee, incorporator, member, manager,
partner, stockholder, agent, attorney or representative of any
party hereto shall have any liability for any obligations or
liabilities of the parties to this Agreement or for any claim
based on, in respect of, or by reason of, the transactions
contemplated hereby.
Section 6.16 Action
in Unitholder Capacity Only. The parties
acknowledge that this Agreement is entered into by Holdings and
Holdings GP solely in their capacity as the Beneficial Owner of
the Owned Units and the general partner of such Beneficial
Owner, respectively.
B-10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has caused this Agreement
to be signed as of the date first above written.
HH GP HOLDING, LLC
Harold Hamm
President
HLND MERGERCO, LLC
Harold Hamm
President
HILAND PARTNERS GP, LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
L. Griffin
|
Joseph L. Griffin
Chief Executive Officer and President
HILAND PARTNERS, LP
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Hiland Partners GP, LLC,
its General Partner
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
L. Griffin
|
Joseph L. Griffin
Chief Executive Officer and President
Signature
Page to Support Agreement (HLND Units)
HILAND PARTNERS GP HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
L. Griffin
|
Joseph L. Griffin
Chief Executive Officer and President
HILAND HOLDINGS GP, LP
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC,
its General Partner
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
L. Griffin
|
Joseph L. Griffin
Chief Executive Officer and President
Signature Page to Support
Agreement (HLND Units)
Schedule
A
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP OF UNITS
|
|
|
|
|
Hiland Holdings GP, LP
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
2,321,471
|
|
Subordinated Units
|
|
|
3,060,000
|
|
Annex C
PRIVILEGED
AND CONFIDENTIAL
June 1, 2009
Conflicts Committee of the Board of Directors
Hiland Partners GP, LLC
205 West Maple, Suite 1100
Enid, Oklahoma 73701
Members of the Conflicts Committee:
We understand that HH GP Holding, LLC, an Oklahoma limited
liability company (Parent), HLND MergerCo, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and subsidiary of Parent
(Merger Sub), Hiland Partners GP, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and the general partner of the
Partnership (Partnership GP), and Hiland Partners,
LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the
Partnership), propose to enter into an Agreement and
Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), pursuant to
which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Partnership (the
Merger) in a transaction in which each outstanding
Common Unit, as defined in the First Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership, other than
any Common Units included among the Rollover Interests (as
defined in the Merger Agreement), all of which Common Units will
be canceled, will be converted into the right to receive $7.75
in cash (the Consideration). The terms and
conditions of the Merger are more fully set forth in the Merger
Agreement.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether the Consideration
to be received by the holders of Common Units pursuant to the
Merger Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view, to
such holders (other than the Partnership GP and its Affiliates,
including Hiland Holdings GP, LP). Capitalized terms not defined
herein are defined in the Merger Agreement.
In arriving at our opinion, we have, among other things:
(i) reviewed a draft dated May 28, 2009 of the Merger
Agreement;
(ii) reviewed certain publicly available financial and
other information about the Partnership;
(iii) reviewed certain information furnished to us by the
Partnerships management, including financial forecasts and
analyses, relating to the business, operations and prospects of
the Partnership;
(iv) held discussions with members of senior management of
the Partnership concerning the matters described in
clauses (ii) and (iii) above;
(v) reviewed the trading price history and valuation
multiples for the Common Units and compared them with those of
certain publicly traded entities that we deemed relevant;
(vi) compared the proposed financial terms of the Merger
with the financial terms of certain other transactions that we
deemed relevant; and
(vii) conducted such other financial studies, analyses and
investigations as we deemed appropriate.
In our review and analysis and in rendering this opinion, we
have assumed and relied upon, but have not assumed any
responsibility to independently investigate or verify, the
accuracy and completeness of all
C-1
financial and other information that was supplied or otherwise
made available to us or that was publicly available (including,
without limitation, the information described above), or that
was otherwise reviewed by us. We have relied on the assurances
of the management of the Partnership that they are not aware of
any facts or circumstances that would make such information
inaccurate or misleading. In our review, we did not obtain any
independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or
liabilities, nor did we conduct a physical inspection of any of
the properties or facilities, of the Partnership, nor have we
been furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals or any
such physical inspections, nor do we assume any responsibility
to obtain any such evaluations or appraisals.
With respect to the financial forecasts provided to and examined
by us, we note that projecting future results of any company is
inherently subject to uncertainty. The Partnership has informed
us, however, and we have assumed, that such financial forecasts
were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and good faith judgments of the management
of the Partnership as to the future financial performance of the
Partnership. We express no opinion as to any such financial
forecasts or the assumptions on which they were made.
Our opinion is based on economic, monetary, regulatory, market
and other conditions existing and which can be evaluated as of
the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any undertaking or
obligation to advise any person of any change in any fact or
matter affecting our opinion of which we become aware after the
date hereof.
We have made no independent investigation of any legal or
accounting matters affecting the Partnership, and we have
assumed the correctness in all respects material to our analysis
of all legal and accounting advice given to the Partnership and
the Board of Directors of Partnership GP, including, without
limitation, advice as to the legal, accounting and tax
consequences of the terms of, and transactions contemplated by,
the Merger Agreement to the Partnership and the holders of
Common Units. In addition, in preparing this opinion, we have
not taken into account any tax consequences of the transaction
to any holder of Common Units. We have assumed that the final
form of the Merger Agreement will be substantially similar to
the last draft reviewed by us. We have also assumed that, in the
course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party
approvals, consents and releases for the Merger, no delay,
limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would
have an adverse effect on the Partnership, Parent or the
contemplated benefits of the Merger in any way meaningful to our
analysis.
In addition, we were not requested to and did not provide advice
concerning the structure, the specific amount of the
Consideration, or any other aspects of the Merger, or to provide
services other than the delivery of this opinion. We were not
authorized to and did not solicit any expressions of interest
from any other parties with respect to the sale of all or any
part of the Partnership or any other alternative transaction. We
did not participate in negotiations with respect to the terms of
the Merger and related transactions. Consequently, we have
assumed that such terms are the most beneficial terms from the
Partnerships perspective that could under the
circumstances be negotiated among the parties to such
transactions, and no opinion is expressed as to whether any
alternative transaction might result in consideration more
favorable to the Partnerships common unitholders than that
contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
It is understood that our opinion is for the use and benefit of
the Partnership GP and the Conflicts Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Partnership GP in its consideration of the
Merger, and our opinion does not address the relative merits of
the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement as
compared to any alternative transaction or opportunity that
might be available to the Partnership, nor does it address the
underlying business decision by the Partnership to engage in the
Merger or the terms of the Merger Agreement or the documents
referred to therein. Our opinion does not constitute a
recommendation as to how any holder of Common Units should vote
on the Merger or any matter related thereto. In addition, you
have not asked us to address, and this opinion does not address,
the fairness to, or any other consideration of, the holders of
any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of
the Partnership, other than the holders of Common Units. We
express no opinion as to the price at which Common Units will
trade at any time. Furthermore, we do not express any view or
opinion as to the fairness, financial or otherwise, of the
amount or nature of any compensation to be received by any of
the Partnerships officers, directors or employees, or any
class of such
C-2
persons, in connection with the Merger relative to the
Consideration to be received by holders of Common Units. Our
opinion has been authorized by the Fairness Committee of
Jefferies & Company, Inc.
We have been engaged by you to render this opinion and will
receive a fee from the Partnership for our services, a portion
of which was payable prior to the date hereof and the remainder
of which is payable upon delivery of this opinion. We also will
be reimbursed for expenses incurred. The Partnership has agreed
to indemnify us against liabilities arising out of or in
connection with the services rendered and to be rendered by us
under such engagement. We have, in the past, provided financial
advisory and financing services to the Partnership and
affiliates of the Partnership and may continue to do so and have
received, and may receive, fees for the rendering of such
services. We maintain a market in the securities of the
Partnership, and, in the ordinary course of our business, we and
our affiliates may trade or hold securities of the Partnership
and/or its
respective affiliates for our own account and for the accounts
of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold long or
short positions in those securities. In addition, we may seek
to, in the future, provide financial advisory and financing
services to the Partnership, Parent or entities that are
affiliated with the Partnership or Parent, for which we would
expect to receive compensation. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in our engagement letter with the Partnership, our
opinion may not be used or referred to by the Partnership, or
quoted or disclosed to any person in any matter, without our
prior written consent.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
that, as of the date hereof, the Consideration to be received by
the holders of Common Units pursuant to the Merger Agreement is
fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders (other
than Rollover Parties).
Very truly yours,
JEFFERIES & COMPANY, INC.
C-3
Annex D
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
among
HH GP HOLDING, LLC,
HPGP MERGERCO, LLC,
HILAND PARTNERS GP HOLDINGS, LLC
and
HILAND HOLDINGS GP, LP
Executed June 1, 2009
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE I THE MERGER
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
Section 1.1
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
Section 1.3
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
Section 1.4
|
|
Effects of the Merger
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
Section 1.5
|
|
Partnership Agreement of the Surviving Entity
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
Section 1.6
|
|
Admission of Additional Limited Partners
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE II CONVERSION OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS; EXCHANGE OF
CERTIFICATES
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
Section 2.1
|
|
Effect on Partnership Interests
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
Section 2.2
|
|
Exchange of Certificates
|
|
|
D-4
|
|
Section 2.3
|
|
Timing for Rollover Interests
|
|
|
D-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE HOLDINGS
PARTIES
|
|
|
D-5
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
Qualification, Organization, Subsidiaries, Etc.
|
|
|
D-6
|
|
Section 3.2
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
D-6
|
|
Section 3.3
|
|
Authority; No Violation; Consents and Approvals
|
|
|
D-7
|
|
Section 3.4
|
|
SEC Reports and Compliance
|
|
|
D-8
|
|
Section 3.5
|
|
No Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
Section 3.6
|
|
Compliance with Law
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
Section 3.7
|
|
Employee Benefits
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
Section 3.8
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
Section 3.9
|
|
Investigations; Litigation
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
Section 3.10
|
|
Proxy Statement; Other Information
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
Section 3.11
|
|
Tax Matters
|
|
|
D-10
|
|
Section 3.12
|
|
Labor Matters
|
|
|
D-10
|
|
Section 3.13
|
|
Assets of the Holdings Parties
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
Section 3.14
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
Section 3.15
|
|
Required Approvals
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
Section 3.16
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
Section 3.17
|
|
State Takeover Laws
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
Section 3.18
|
|
Finders or Brokers
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
Section 3.19
|
|
No Other Representations or Warranties
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE PARENT
PARTIES
|
|
|
D-12
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
Qualification; Organization
|
|
|
D-12
|
|
Section 4.2
|
|
Authority; No Violation; Consents and Approvals
|
|
|
D-12
|
|
Section 4.3
|
|
Proxy Statement; Other Information
|
|
|
D-13
|
|
Section 4.4
|
|
Funding
|
|
|
D-13
|
|
Section 4.5
|
|
Ownership and Operations of Merger Sub
|
|
|
D-13
|
|
Section 4.6
|
|
Finders or Brokers
|
|
|
D-13
|
|
Section 4.7
|
|
Access to Information; No Other Representations or Warranties;
Disclaimer
|
|
|
D-14
|
|
D-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE V COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
|
|
|
D-14
|
|
Section 5.1
|
|
Conduct of Business by Holdings and Parent
|
|
|
D-14
|
|
Section 5.2
|
|
Investigation
|
|
|
D-15
|
|
Section 5.3
|
|
No Solicitation
|
|
|
D-16
|
|
Section 5.4
|
|
Filings; Other Actions
|
|
|
D-18
|
|
Section 5.5
|
|
Equity Awards
|
|
|
D-19
|
|
Section 5.6
|
|
Efforts
|
|
|
D-19
|
|
Section 5.7
|
|
Takeover Statute
|
|
|
D-20
|
|
Section 5.8
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
D-20
|
|
Section 5.9
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance
|
|
|
D-20
|
|
Section 5.10
|
|
Unitholder Litigation
|
|
|
D-21
|
|
Section 5.11
|
|
Notification of Certain Matters
|
|
|
D-21
|
|
Section 5.12
|
|
Rule 16b-3
|
|
|
D-22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
|
|
|
D-22
|
|
Section 6.1
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger
|
|
|
D-22
|
|
Section 6.2
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of the Holdings Parties to Effect the
Merger
|
|
|
D-22
|
|
Section 6.3
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of the Parent Parties to Effect the
Merger
|
|
|
D-23
|
|
Section 6.4
|
|
Frustration of Conditions
|
|
|
D-23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII TERMINATION
|
|
|
D-24
|
|
Section 7.1
|
|
Termination or Abandonment
|
|
|
D-24
|
|
Section 7.2
|
|
Reimbursement of Certain Expenses
|
|
|
D-25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
|
D-25
|
|
Section 8.1
|
|
No Survival of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
D-25
|
|
Section 8.2
|
|
Hiland Merger
|
|
|
D-25
|
|
Section 8.3
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
D-26
|
|
Section 8.4
|
|
Counterparts; Effectiveness
|
|
|
D-26
|
|
Section 8.5
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
D-26
|
|
Section 8.6
|
|
Specific Performance; Jurisdiction; Enforcement
|
|
|
D-26
|
|
Section 8.7
|
|
WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
|
|
|
D-26
|
|
Section 8.8
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
D-26
|
|
Section 8.9
|
|
Assignment; Binding Effect
|
|
|
D-27
|
|
Section 8.10
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
D-28
|
|
Section 8.11
|
|
Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
D-28
|
|
Section 8.12
|
|
Amendments; Waivers
|
|
|
D-28
|
|
Section 8.13
|
|
Headings; Interpretation.
|
|
|
D-28
|
|
Section 8.14
|
|
No Recourse
|
|
|
D-29
|
|
Section 8.15
|
|
Certain Definitions
|
|
|
D-29
|
|
Exhibit A
Form of Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
D-ii
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, executed this 1st day of
June, 2009 (this Agreement), is entered into
among HH GP Holding, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company
(Parent), HPGP MergerCo, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and a subsidiary of Parent
(Merger Sub and, together with Parent, the
Parent Parties), Hiland Partners GP Holdings,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the general
partner of Holdings (Holdings GP), and Hiland
Holdings GP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
(Holdings and, together with Holdings GP, the
Holdings Parties).
W I T N E
S S E T H
:
WHEREAS, the parties intend that Merger Sub be merged with and
into Holdings, with Holdings surviving that merger on the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement (the
Merger);
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that, on the Closing Date (as
defined herein), HLND MergerCo, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company and a subsidiary of Parent (HLND
Merger Sub), be merged with and into Hiland Partners,
LP, a Delaware limited partnership (Hiland),
with Hiland surviving that merger (the Hiland
Merger) on the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of the date
hereof (the Hiland Agreement), among Parent,
HLND Merger Sub, Hiland Partners GP, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company and the general partner of Hiland
(Hiland GP and, together with Hiland, the
Hiland Parties), and Hiland;
WHEREAS, the board of directors of Holdings GP (the
Board of Directors), acting upon the
unanimous recommendation of its Conflicts Committee, has
(i) determined that this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby are advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of Holdings and the holders of Common Units (other
than Harold Hamm, his Affiliates (including Continental Gas
Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Continental
Gas)) and the Trusts), (ii) approved the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the
Holdings Parties and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby, including the Merger, and
(iii) resolved to recommend approval of this Agreement and
the Merger by the holders of Common Units (excluding Common
Units owned by Mr. Hamm, his Affiliates (including
Continental Gas) and the Trusts);
WHEREAS, the Trusts and certain Affiliates of Parent are parties
to a Support Agreement, dated the date hereof (the
Support Agreement), with Holdings and
Holdings GP pursuant to which the Trusts and such Affiliates
have, among other things: (i) agreed that the Partnership
Interests of which they are the record and beneficial owners
will not be converted into the right to receive the Merger
Consideration and will remain outstanding as Partnership
Interests of the Surviving Entity (as defined herein) in the
Merger, and (ii) agreed to vote the Common Units of which
they are the record and beneficial owners in favor of the
approval of this Agreement and the Merger;
WHEREAS, the board of directors of each of Parent and Merger Sub
and the sole member of Merger Sub have unanimously approved this
Agreement and declared it advisable for Parent and Merger Sub,
respectively, to enter into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to make certain representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with the
Merger and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
also to prescribe certain conditions to the Merger as specified
herein.
D-1
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained
herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Parent, Merger
Sub, Holdings GP and Holdings hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
The Merger
Section 1.1 The
Merger. At the Effective Time, upon the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement and in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the Delaware
Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act
(DRULPA) and the Delaware Limited Liability
Company Act (DLLCA), Merger Sub shall be
merged with and into Holdings, whereupon the separate existence
of Merger Sub shall cease, and Holdings shall continue as the
surviving entity in the Merger (the Surviving
Entity).
Section 1.2 Closing. The
closing of the Merger (the Closing) shall
take place at the offices of Baker Botts L.L.P. at 910 Louisiana
Street, Houston, Texas at 10:00 a.m., local time, on a date
to be specified by the parties (the Closing
Date) which shall be no later than the third Business
Day after the satisfaction or waiver (to the extent permitted by
applicable Law) of the conditions set forth in Article VI
(other than those conditions that by their nature are to be
satisfied at the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of such conditions), or at such other place, date and
time as Holdings and Parent may agree in writing.
Section 1.3 Effective
Time. At the Closing, Holdings shall cause
the Merger to be consummated by executing and filing a
certificate of merger (the Certificate of
Merger) with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware in accordance with
Section 17-211
of the DRULPA and
Section 18-209
of the DLLCA. The Merger shall become effective at such time as
the Certificate of Merger is duly filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware, or at such later date or time as
may be agreed by Parent and Holdings in writing and specified in
the Certificate of Merger in accordance with the DRULPA and the
DLLCA (such time as the Merger becomes effective is referred to
herein as the Effective Time).
Section 1.4 Effects
of the Merger. The Merger shall have the
effects set forth in this Agreement, the Partnership Agreement
and the applicable provisions of the DRULPA and DLLCA.
Section 1.5 Partnership
Agreement of the Surviving Entity. The
Partnership Agreement, as in effect immediately prior to the
Effective Time, shall remain the partnership agreement of the
Surviving Entity and shall continue in effect until thereafter
changed or amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and
applicable Law.
Section 1.6 Admission
of Additional Limited Partners. Upon the
conversion of the limited liability company interests in Merger
Sub (Merger Sub LLC Interests), which are
denominated in units (Merger Sub LLC Units),
into Common Units pursuant to Section 2.1(c) and the
recording of the name of the holder thereof as a limited partner
of Holdings on the books and records of Holdings, such Person
shall automatically and effective as of the Effective Time be
admitted to Holdings as an additional Limited Partner and be
bound by the Partnership Agreement as such.
ARTICLE II
Conversion
of Partnership Interests; Exchange of Certificates
Section 2.1 Effect
on Partnership Interests. At the Effective
Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part
of Holdings, Merger Sub or the holders of any securities of
Holdings or Merger Sub:
(a) Conversion of Common Units. Subject
to Sections 2.1(b) and 2.1(d), each Common Unit issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than
any Common Units included among the Rollover Interests, shall
thereupon be converted automatically into and shall thereafter
represent the right to receive $2.40 in cash without any
interest thereon (the Merger Consideration).
Immediately prior to the Effective Time, each award of
Restricted Units (as defined in the Hiland Holdings GP, LP
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Holdings LTIP))
issued and outstanding to any nonemployee member of the Board of
Directors shall become fully vested as Common Units and shall
thereupon be converted
D-2
automatically into and shall thereafter represent the right to
receive the Merger Consideration. All Common Units that have
been converted into the right to receive the Merger
Consideration as provided in this Section 2.1 shall be
automatically cancelled and shall cease to exist, and the
holders of such Common Units immediately prior to the Effective
Time (whether certificated or non-certificated and represented
in book-entry form) shall cease to have any rights with respect
to such Common Units other than the right to receive the Merger
Consideration.
(b) Rollover of Certain Partnership
Interests. The following Partnership Interests
shall be treated in the Merger as follows:
(i) each of the 8,481,350 Common Units owned by Continental
Gas Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Continental
Gas), shall be unchanged and remain outstanding as
Common Units of the Surviving Entity, and no consideration shall
be delivered in respect thereof;
(ii) each of the 2,757,390 Common Units owned by the Harold
Hamm DST Trust (or Bert Harold Mackie, as trustee thereof) shall
be unchanged and remain outstanding as Common Units of the
Surviving Entity, and no consideration shall be delivered in
respect thereof;
(iii) each of the 1,839,712 Common Units owned by the
Harold Hamm HJ Trust (or Bert Harold Mackie, as trustee thereof)
shall be unchanged and remain outstanding as Common Units of the
Surviving Entity, and no consideration shall be delivered in
respect thereof;
(iv) each of the 59,600 Common Units owned by Harold Hamm
shall be unchanged and remain outstanding as Common Units of the
Surviving Entity, and no consideration shall be delivered in
respect thereof; and
(v) the General Partner Interest, which is owned by
Holdings GP, shall be unchanged and remain outstanding as the
General Partner Interest of the Surviving Entity, and no
consideration shall be delivered in respect thereof.
The Partnership Interests described in this Section 2.1(b)
are referred to in this Agreement as Rollover
Interests, and the record and beneficial owners of
such Rollover Interests are referred to in this Agreement as the
Rollover Parties.
(c) Conversion of Merger Sub Limited Liability Company
Interests. At the Effective Time, by virtue of
the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder
thereof, each Merger Sub LLC Unit issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into
and become one Common Unit of the Surviving Entity, which Common
Units shall be duly authorized and validly issued in accordance
with applicable Laws and the Partnership Agreement and shall be
fully paid (to the extent required by the Partnership Agreement)
and nonassessable (except to the extent such nonassessability
may be affected by
Sections 17-607
and 17-804
of DRULPA). Immediately after the Effective Time, such Common
Units and the Rollover Interests will constitute the only
outstanding Partnership Interests of the Surviving Entity. From
and after the Effective Time, any certificates or other evidence
representing the Merger Sub LLC Units shall be deemed for all
purposes to represent the number of Common Units of the
Surviving Entity into which such Merger Sub LLC Units were
converted in accordance with this Section 2.1(c). Holdings
GP hereby agrees and acknowledges that conversion of the Merger
Sub LLC Units to Common Units of the Surviving Entity as
provided herein shall constitute a duly authorized, accepted,
executed and countersigned delivery of such Common Units,
without any further action by Holdings GP or any other person.
(d) Adjustments. If between the date of
this Agreement and the Effective Time, the outstanding Common
Units, including securities convertible or exchangeable into or
exercisable for Common Units, shall be changed into a different
number of units or other securities by reason of any split,
combination, merger, consolidation, reorganization,
reclassification, recapitalization or other similar transaction,
or any distribution payable in Partnership Interests shall be
declared thereon with a record date within such period, the
Merger Consideration shall be appropriately adjusted to provide
the holders of Common Units the same economic effect as
contemplated by this Agreement prior to such event;
provided that nothing
D-3
herein shall be construed to permit Holdings to take any action
with respect to its securities that is expressly prohibited by
the terms of this Agreement.
Section 2.2 Exchange
of Certificates.
(a) Paying Agent. Prior to the mailing of
the Proxy Statement (as defined herein), Parent shall appoint a
U.S. bank or trust company agreeable to the Conflicts
Committee to act as paying agent (the Paying
Agent) for the holders of Common Units (other than the
Rollover Parties) in connection with the Merger and to receive
and pay out the Merger Consideration to which such holders shall
become entitled pursuant to Section 2.1. At or prior to the
Effective Time, the Parent Parties shall deposit, or shall cause
to be deposited, in trust with the Paying Agent, for the benefit
of holders of Common Units (other than the Rollover Parties),
cash in an amount sufficient to pay the aggregate Merger
Consideration in exchange for all Common Units outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Common Units
included among the Rollover Interests), payable upon due
surrender of the certificates that immediately prior to the
Effective Time represented Common Units
(Certificates) (or effective affidavits of
loss in lieu thereof) or non-certificated Common Units
represented in book-entry form (Book-Entry Common
Units) pursuant to the provisions of this
Article II (such cash hereinafter referred to as the
Exchange Fund).
(b) Payment Procedures.
(i) As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective
Time and in any event not later than the fifth Business Day
following the Effective Time, Parent shall cause the Paying
Agent to mail to each holder of record of Common Units whose
Common Units were converted into the Merger Consideration
pursuant to Section 2.1(a), (A) a letter of
transmittal (the Letter of Transmittal)
(which shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk
of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon
proper delivery of the Certificates (or effective affidavits of
loss in lieu thereof) to the Paying Agent or, in the case of
Book-Entry Common Units, upon adherence to the procedures set
forth in the Letter of Transmittal, and shall be in such
customary form and have such other provisions as Parent and the
Holdings Parties shall reasonably determine) and
(B) instructions for use of the Letter of Transmittal in
effecting the surrender of the Certificates (or effective
affidavits of loss in lieu thereof) or Book-Entry Common Units
in exchange for the Merger Consideration.
(ii) Upon surrender of a Certificate (or an effective
affidavit of loss in lieu thereof) or Book-Entry Common Units to
the Paying Agent together with such Letter of Transmittal, duly
completed and validly executed in accordance with the
instructions thereto, and such other documents as may
customarily be required by the Paying Agent, the holder of such
Certificate or Book-Entry Common Units shall be entitled to
receive in exchange therefor a check in an amount equal to the
product of (x) the number of Common Units represented by
such holders properly surrendered Certificates (or
effective affidavits of loss in lieu thereof) or Book-Entry
Common Units multiplied by (y) the Merger Consideration. No
interest shall be paid or accrued for the benefit of holders of
the Certificates or Book-Entry Common Units on the Merger
Consideration payable in respect of the Certificates or
Book-Entry Common Units. In the event of a transfer of ownership
of Common Units that is not registered in the unit transfer
register of Holdings, a check for any cash to be paid upon due
surrender of the Certificate may be paid to such a transferee if
the Certificate formerly representing such Common Units is
presented to the Paying Agent, accompanied by all documents
required to evidence and effect such transfer and to evidence
that any applicable unit transfer or other Taxes have been paid
or are not applicable.
(iii) Parent, the Surviving Entity and the Paying Agent
shall be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration
otherwise payable under this Agreement to any holder of Common
Units such amounts as are required to be withheld or deducted
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), or any provision of federal, state,
local or foreign Tax Law with respect to the making of such
payment. To the extent that amounts are so withheld or deducted
and paid over to the applicable Governmental Entity, such
withheld or deducted amounts shall be treated for all purposes
of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder of Common
Units in respect of which such deduction and withholding were
made.
D-4
(c) Closing of Transfer Register. At the
Effective Time, the unit transfer register of Holdings shall be
closed, and there shall be no further registration of transfers
on the unit transfer register of the Surviving Entity of Common
Units (other than the Rollover Interests) that were outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective
Time, Certificates or Book-Entry Common Units provided for in
Section 2.1(a) are presented to the Surviving Entity or
Parent for transfer, they shall be cancelled and exchanged for a
check in the proper amount pursuant to and subject to the
requirements of this Article II.
(d) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any
portion of the Exchange Fund (including the proceeds of any
investments thereof) that remains undistributed to the former
holders of Common Units for twelve months after the Effective
Time shall be delivered to the Surviving Entity upon demand, and
any former holders of Common Units who have not surrendered
their Certificates or Book-Entry Common Units provided for in
Section 2.1(a) in accordance with this Section 2.2
shall thereafter look only to the Surviving Entity for payment
of their claim for the Merger Consideration, without any
interest thereon, upon due surrender of their Certificates or
Book-Entry Common Units.
(e) No Liability. Notwithstanding
anything herein to the contrary, none of Parent, Merger Sub,
Holdings, Holdings GP, the Surviving Entity, the Paying Agent or
any other person shall be liable to any former holder of Common
Units for any amount properly delivered to a public official
pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or
similar Law.
(f) Investment of Exchange Fund. The
Paying Agent shall invest the Exchange Fund as reasonably
directed by Parent; provided, however, that any
investment of such Exchange Fund shall be limited to direct
short-term obligations of, or short-term obligations fully
guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the
U.S. government and that no such investment or loss thereon
shall affect the amounts payable to holders of Common Units that
converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration
pursuant to Section 2.1. Any interest and other income
resulting from such investments shall be paid to the Surviving
Entity pursuant to Section 2.2(d).
(g) Lost Certificates. In the event that
any Certificate representing Common Units provided for in
Section 2.1(a) shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed,
upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the person
claiming such Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and,
if required by Parent or the Paying Agent, the posting by such
person of a bond in customary amount as indemnity against any
claim that may be made against it with respect to such
Certificate, the Paying Agent will issue in exchange for such
lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate a check in the amount of
the number of Common Units represented by such lost, stolen or
destroyed Certificate multiplied by the Merger Consideration.
Section 2.3 Timing
for Rollover Interests. For the avoidance of
doubt, the parties acknowledge and agree that the Rollover
Commitments shall be deemed to become effective and irrevocable
immediately prior to the Effective Time and prior to any other
event described above in this Article II.
ARTICLE III
Representations
and Warranties of the Holdings Parties
Except as disclosed (a) in (i) the Holdings SEC
Documents (as defined herein) or (ii) the Hiland SEC
Documents (as defined in the Hiland Agreement), in each case
filed on or after December 31, 2008 and prior to the date
of this Agreement (excluding any disclosures included in any
risk factor section of such documents and any other disclosures
in such documents to the extent that they are cautionary,
predictive or forward-looking in nature) or (b) in a
section of the disclosure schedule delivered concurrently
herewith by the Holdings Parties to Parent (the
Holdings Disclosure Schedule) corresponding
to the applicable sections of this Article III to which
such disclosure applies (provided, however, that
any information set forth in one section of such Holdings
Disclosure Schedule also shall be deemed to apply to each other
section of this
D-5
Agreement to which its relevance is reasonably apparent), the
Holdings Parties hereby represent and warrant, jointly and
severally, to the Parent Parties as follows:
Section 3.1 Qualification,
Organization, Subsidiaries, Etc.
(a) Section 3.1(a) of the Holdings Disclosure Schedule
sets forth, as of the date hereof, a true and complete list of
the Holdings Parties and each direct or indirect Subsidiary and
Partially Owned Entity of Holdings (collectively, the
Holdings Group Entities), together with
(i) the nature of the legal organization of such person,
(ii) the jurisdiction of organization or formation of such
person, (iii) the name of each Holdings Group Entity that
owns beneficially or of record any equity or similar interest in
such person, and (iv) the capital stock or other ownership
interest owned by each such Holdings Group Entity in such other
persons.
(b) Each Holdings Party is a legal entity validly existing
and in good standing under the Laws of its respective
jurisdiction of formation. Each Holdings Party has all requisite
limited partnership, limited liability company or corporate, as
the case may be, power and authority to own, lease and operate
its properties and assets and to carry on its business as
presently conducted in all material respects.
(c) Each Holdings Party is duly registered or qualified to
do business and is in good standing as a foreign limited
partnership, limited liability company or corporation, as the
case may be, in each jurisdiction where the ownership, leasing
or operation of its assets or properties or the conduct of its
business requires such registration or qualification, except
where the failure to be so registered, qualified or in good
standing would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
Holdings Material Adverse Effect. The organizational or
governing documents of the Holdings Parties, as previously made
available to Parent, are in full force and effect. None of the
Holdings Parties is in violation of its organizational or
governing documents.
Section 3.2 Capitalization.
(a) Holdings GP is the sole general partner of Holdings.
Holdings GP is the record and beneficial owner of the 0%
non-economic General Partner Interest in Holdings, and such
General Partner Interest has been duly authorized and validly
issued in accordance with applicable Laws and the Partnership
Agreement. Holdings GP owns all of the General Partner Interest
free and clear of any Encumbrances except pursuant to the
organizational or governing documents of any of the Holdings
Parties. Parent is the record owner of all of the limited
liability company interests in Holdings GP. Such limited
liability company interests in Holdings GP have been duly
authorized and validly issued in accordance with applicable Laws
and the limited liability company agreement of Holdings GP and
are fully paid (to the extent required by the limited liability
company agreement of Partnership GP) and nonassessable (except
to the extent such nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 18-607
and 18-804
of DLLCA).
(b) As of the date of this Agreement (the
Execution Date), Holdings has no Partnership
Interests issued and outstanding other than the following:
(i) 21,607,500 Common Units; and
(ii) the General Partner Interest.
Each of such limited partner interests described in
clause (i) above has been duly authorized and validly
issued in accordance with applicable Laws and the Partnership
Agreement, and is fully paid (to the extent required under the
Partnership Agreement) and non-assessable (except to the extent
such nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 17-607
and 17-804
of DRULPA). Such limited partner interests were not issued in
violation of any preemptive or similar rights or any other
agreement or understanding binding on Holdings. As of the date
of this Agreement, except for outstanding awards for the
issuance of 16,500 Restricted Units pursuant to the Holdings
LTIP and except pursuant to the organizational or governing
documents of any of the Holdings Parties, (A) there are no
outstanding options, warrants, subscriptions, puts, calls or
other rights, agreements, arrangements or commitments
(preemptive, contingent or otherwise) obligating any of the
Holdings Parties to offer, issue, sell, redeem, repurchase,
otherwise acquire or transfer, pledge or encumber any equity
interest in any of the Holdings Parties; (B) there are no
outstanding securities or obligations of any kind of any of the
Holdings Parties that are convertible into or exercisable or
exchangeable for any equity interest in any of the Holdings
Parties or any other person, and none of the Holdings Parties
has any obligation
D-6
of any kind to issue any additional securities or to pay for or
repurchase any securities; (C) there are not outstanding
any equity appreciation rights, phantom equity or similar
rights, agreements, arrangements or commitments based on the
value of the equity, book value, income or any other attribute
of any of the Holdings Parties; (D) there are no
outstanding bonds, debentures or other evidences of indebtedness
of any of the Holdings Parties having the right to vote (or that
are exchangeable for or convertible or exercisable into
securities having the right to vote) with the holders of Common
Units on any matter; and (E) except as described in the
organizational or governing documents of the Holdings Parties or
the Support Agreement, there are no Unitholder agreements,
proxies, voting trusts, rights to require registration under
securities Laws or other arrangements or commitments to which
any of the Holdings Parties is a party or to the knowledge of
the Holdings Parties by which any of their securities are bound
with respect to the voting, disposition or registration of any
outstanding securities of any of the Holdings Parties.
(c) All of the outstanding limited liability company,
partnership or other equity interests of each Subsidiary of
Holdings (but, for purposes of this Section 3.2(c), not
including Subsidiaries of Hiland) (i) have been duly
authorized and validly issued in accordance with applicable Laws
and its governing documents and are fully paid (to the extent
required by its governing documents) and nonassessable (except
to the extent such nonassessability may be affected by
applicable Laws, including
Sections 17-607
and 17-804
of DRULPA) and (ii) are owned directly or indirectly by
Holdings in the amounts set forth in Section 3.1(a) of the
Holdings Disclosure Schedule, free and clear of any Encumbrance
except pursuant to the organizational or governing documents of
any of the Holdings Group Entities (not including Subsidiaries
and Partially Owned Entities of Hiland) and other than
Encumbrances securing the obligations of Holdings under the
Holdings Credit Agreement and Hiland Operating, LLC under the
Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
(d) All of the outstanding equity interests of each
Partially Owned Entity of Holdings (but, for purposes of this
Section 3.2(d), not including Partially Owned Entities of
Hiland) (i) have been duly authorized and validly issued in
accordance with applicable Laws and its governing documents and
are fully paid (to the extent required by its organizational or
governing documents) and nonassessable (except to the extent
such nonassessability may be affected by applicable Laws), and
(ii) are owned directly or indirectly by Holdings in the
respective amounts shown on Section 3.1(a) of the Holdings
Disclosure Schedule, free and clear of any Encumbrance except
pursuant to the organizational or governing documents of any of
the Holdings Group Entities (not including Subsidiaries and
Partially Owned Entities of Hiland).
(e) Except with respect to the ownership of any equity or
long-term debt securities between or among the Holdings Group
Entities, none of the Holdings Parties owns or will own at the
Closing Date, directly or indirectly, any equity or long-term
debt securities of any corporation, partnership, limited
liability company, joint venture, association or other entity.
(f) Except as provided in the Partnership Agreement, no
holder of Partnership Interests in any of the Holdings Parties
has any right to have such Partnership Interests registered
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act), by Holdings.
Section 3.3 Authority;
No Violation; Consents and Approvals.
(a) Each of the Holdings Parties has all requisite limited
liability company or limited partnership power and authority to
enter into this Agreement, to carry out its obligations
hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby. The execution, delivery and performance by each Holdings
Party of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all requisite
limited liability company or limited partnership action on the
part of such Holdings Party, except for (i) Unitholder
Approval of this Agreement and the Merger and (ii) the
filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State
of the State of Delaware; and no other vote or approval by any
holders of Partnership Interests or limited liability company
interests in Holdings GP or other corporate, limited liability
company, partnership or other organizational votes, approvals or
proceedings in respect of the Holdings Parties are necessary to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no representation or warranty is
made concerning whether the consent of Holdings GP, to the
extent reserved to Parent pursuant to Section 7.1(d) of the
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Holdings GP (the Holdings GP LLC Agreement),
was validly adopted by Parent.
D-7
(b) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
each Holdings Party and, assuming the due authorization,
execution and delivery hereof by the Parent Parties, constitutes
a legal, valid and binding agreement of such Holdings Party,
enforceable against such Holdings Party in accordance with its
terms (except insofar as such enforceability may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization,
moratorium and similar laws relating to or affecting
creditors rights generally and by general principles of
equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered
in a proceeding in equity or at law)).
(c) Except for matters expressly contemplated by this
Agreement and matters described in clauses (ii), (iii) or
(iv) below that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Holdings Material Adverse Effect, neither the
execution and delivery by the Holdings Parties of this
Agreement, nor the consummation by the Holdings Parties of the
transactions contemplated hereby and the performance by the
Holdings Parties of this Agreement will (i) violate or
conflict with any provision of the organizational or governing
documents of the Holdings Group Entities; (ii) require any
consent, approval, authorization or permit of, registration,
declaration or filing with, or notification to, any Governmental
Entity or any other person; (iii) result in any breach of
or constitute a default (or an event that, with notice or lapse
of time or both, would become a default) under, or give to
others any right of termination, cancellation, amendment or
acceleration of any obligation or the loss of any benefit under
any agreement or instrument to which any of the Holdings Group
Entities is a party or by or to which any of their properties
are bound; (iv) result in the creation of an Encumbrance
upon any of the assets of any of the Holdings Group Entities; or
(v) violate or conflict in any material respect with any
material Law applicable to the Holdings Group Entities.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no representation or warranty is
made concerning whether the consent of Holdings GP, to the
extent reserved to Parent pursuant to Section 7.1(d) of the
Holdings GP LLC Agreement was validly adopted by Parent.
(d) Section 3.3(d) of the Holdings Disclosure Schedule
identifies all consents, approvals and authorizations of any
Governmental Entity or third party that are required to be
obtained by any Holdings Group Entity in connection with
(1) the execution and delivery by the Holdings Parties of
this Agreement or (2) the consummation by the Holdings
Parties of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, in
each case except for such consents, approvals and authorizations
that, if not obtained, would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Holdings Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.4 SEC
Reports and Compliance.
(a) The Holdings Parties have filed or furnished all forms,
documents, statements and reports required to be filed or
furnished prior to the date hereof by them with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC) since
January 1, 2007 (the forms, documents, statements and
reports filed with or furnished to the SEC since January 1,
2007 and those filed or furnished with the SEC subsequent to the
date of this Agreement, if any, including any amendments
thereto, the Holdings SEC Documents). As of
their respective dates, or, if amended, as of the date of the
last such amendment prior to the date hereof, the Holdings SEC
Documents complied, and each of the Holdings SEC Documents filed
or furnished subsequent to the date of this Agreement will
comply, in all material respects with the requirements of the
Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), as the case may
be, and the applicable rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder, and complied or will comply, as applicable, in all
material respects with the then-applicable accounting standards
and the rules and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto.
None of the Holdings SEC Documents so filed or furnished or that
will be filed or furnished subsequent to the date of this
Agreement contained or will contain, as the case may be, any
untrue statement of a material fact or omitted or will omit to
state any material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(b) As of the date hereof, there are no outstanding
comments from, or unresolved issues raised by, the SEC with
respect to the Holdings SEC Documents.
(c) The financial statements (including all related notes
and schedules) of Holdings and its Subsidiaries included in or
incorporated by reference into the Holdings SEC Documents (the
Holdings Financial Statements) fairly
present, in all material respects, the financial position of
Holdings and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as at the
respective dates thereof, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for
D-8
the respective periods then ended (subject, in the case of the
unaudited statements, to normal year-end audit adjustments and
to any other adjustments described therein, including the notes
thereto) in conformity with United States generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) (except, in the
case of the unaudited statements, as permitted by the SEC)
applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved
(except as may be specified therein or in the notes thereto).
Section 3.5 No
Undisclosed Liabilities. Neither Holdings nor
any of Holdings Subsidiaries has any indebtedness or
liability (whether absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise)
of any nature that is not accrued or reserved against in the
Holdings Financial Statements filed prior to the execution of
this Agreement or reflected in the notes thereto, other than
(a) liabilities incurred or accrued in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice since
December 31, 2008 or (b) liabilities of Holdings or
any of Holdings Subsidiaries that would not, individually
or in the aggregate, have a Holdings Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.6 Compliance
with Law. Each of the Holdings Parties is in
compliance with all applicable Laws, other than any
noncompliance which would not, individually or in the aggregate,
have a Holdings Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.7 Employee
Benefits.
(a) Except as would not have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Holdings Material Adverse Effect, no Holdings Party
and no company or other entity that is required to be treated as
a single employer together with a Holdings Party under
Section 414 of the Code (each, an ERISA
Affiliate) maintains or has ever maintained or been
obligated to contribute to or has any liability (secondary or
otherwise) to an Employee Benefit Plan that is (1) subject
to Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, as amended (ERISA), or the minimum
funding requirements of Section 412 of the Code or
Section 302 of ERISA, (2) a plan of the type described
in Section 4063 of ERISA or Section 413(c) of the
Code, (3) a multiemployer plan (as defined in
Section 3(37) of ERISA) or (4) a multiple employer
welfare arrangement (as defined in Section 3(40) of ERISA).
(b) Except as would not have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Holdings Material Adverse Effect, the Employee
Benefit Plans of the Holdings Parties and their affiliates
(A) have been maintained (in form and in operation) in all
respects in accordance with their terms and with ERISA, the Code
and all other applicable Laws, (B) if intended to be
qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code, have been
maintained, and are currently, in compliance with the
Codes qualification requirements in form and operation,
and (C) do not provide, and have not provided, any
post-retirement welfare benefits or coverage, except as required
under Part 6 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA and
Section 4980B of the Code (or similar state or local law).
Section 3.8 Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. Since
December 31, 2008, (a) except as otherwise required or
expressly provided for in this Agreement, (i) the
businesses of the Holdings Parties have been conducted, in all
material respects, in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice and (ii) none of the Holdings Parties
has taken or permitted to occur any action that, were it to be
taken from and after the date hereof, would require approval of
Parent pursuant to Section 5.1(b) and (b) there has
not been a Holdings Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.9 Investigations;
Litigation. Except as disclosed in
Section 3.9 of the Holdings Disclosure Schedule, there are
no (a) investigations or proceedings pending (or, to the
Knowledge of the Holdings Parties, threatened) by any
Governmental Entity with respect to the Holdings Parties or
(b) actions, suits, inquiries, investigations or
proceedings pending (or, to the Knowledge of the Holdings
Parties, threatened) against or affecting any Holdings Party, or
any of their respective properties at law or in equity before,
and there are no orders, judgments or decrees of, or before, any
Governmental Entity, in each case of clause (a) or (b),
which would have (if adversely determined), individually or in
the aggregate, a Holdings Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.10 Proxy
Statement; Other Information. None of the
information contained in the Proxy Statement will at the time of
the mailing of the Proxy Statement to the Unitholders of
Holdings, at the time of the Partnership Meeting (as defined
herein) (as such Proxy Statement shall have been amended or
supplemented prior to the date of the Partnership Meeting), and
at the time of any amendments thereof or supplements thereto,
and none of the information supplied or to be supplied by
Holdings for inclusion or
D-9
incorporation by reference in the
Schedule 13E-3
(as defined herein) to be filed with the SEC concurrently with
the filing of the Proxy Statement, will, at the time of its
filing with the SEC, and at the time of any amendments thereof
or supplements thereto, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading; provided that no representation is
made by Holdings with respect to information supplied by a
Parent Party, its controlling Affiliates, Continental Gas, the
Trusts or a Hiland Party for inclusion therein. The Proxy
Statement will comply as to form in all material respects with
the Exchange Act, except that no representation is made by
Holdings with respect to information supplied by a Parent Party,
its controlling Affiliates, Continental Gas, the Trusts or a
Hiland Party for inclusion therein. The letter to Unitholders,
notice of meeting, proxy statement and forms of proxy to be
distributed to Unitholders in connection with the Merger to be
filed with the SEC in connection with seeking the adoption and
approval of this Agreement and the Merger are collectively
referred to herein as the Proxy Statement.
The
Rule 13E-3
Transaction Statement on
Schedule 13E-3
to be filed with the SEC in connection with seeking the adoption
and approval of this Agreement and the Merger is referred to
herein as the
Schedule 13E-3.
Section 3.11 Tax
Matters.
(a) (i) There is no action, suit, proceeding,
investigation, audit or claim now pending against, or with
respect to, any of the Holdings Parties in respect of any
material Tax or material Tax assessment, nor has any claim for
additional material Tax or material Tax assessment been asserted
in writing or been proposed by any Tax authority;
(ii) no written claim has been made by any Tax authority in
a jurisdiction where any of the Holdings Parties does not
currently file a Tax Return that it is or may be subject to any
material Tax in such jurisdiction, nor has any such assertion
been threatened or proposed in writing;
(iii) none of the Holdings Parties has been a member of an
affiliated group filing a consolidated federal income Tax Return
or has any liability for the Taxes of any Person (other than a
Holdings Party) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
(or any similar provision of state, local, or foreign Law), as a
transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise.
(b) In each tax year since the formation of Holdings up to
and including the current tax year, at least 90% of the gross
income of Holdings has been income which is qualifying
income within the meaning of Section 7704(d) of the
Code.
Section 3.12 Labor
Matters. Except as disclosed in
Section 3.12 of the Holdings Disclosure Schedule, no
Holdings Party, other than Holdings GP, has or has ever had
employees. Except for such matters which would not have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Holdings Material Adverse
Effect, no Holdings Party has received written notice during the
past two years of the intent of any Governmental Entity
responsible for the enforcement of labor, employment,
occupational health and safety or workplace safety and
insurance/workers compensation laws to conduct an investigation
of the Holdings Parties and, to the Knowledge of the Holdings
Parties, no such investigation is in progress. Except for such
matters which would not have, individually or in the aggregate,
a Holdings Material Adverse Effect, (i) there are no (and
have not been during the two-year period preceding the date
hereof) strikes or lockouts with respect to any employees of, or
providing services to, the Holdings Parties
(Employees), (ii) to the Knowledge of
the Holdings Parties, there is no (and has not been during the
two-year period preceding the date hereof) union organizing
effort pending or threatened against the Holdings Parties,
(iii) there is no (and has not been during the two-year
period preceding the date hereof) unfair labor practice, labor
dispute or labor arbitration proceeding pending or, to the
Knowledge of the Holdings Parties, threatened against the
Holdings Parties, and (iv) there is no (and has not been
during the two-year period preceding the date hereof) slowdown
or work stoppage in effect or, to the Knowledge of the Holdings
Parties, threatened with respect to Employees. No Holdings Party
has any liabilities under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining
Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder or any similar
state or local law as a result of any action taken by a Holdings
Party that would have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Holdings Material Adverse Effect. No Holdings Party is a party
to any collective bargaining agreements.
D-10
Section 3.13 Assets
of the Holdings Parties. Other than assets
and properties that are both individually and in the aggregate
not material to the business of the Holdings Parties, the only
assets and properties owned by the Holdings Parties are the
ownership interests in Hiland and Hiland GP set forth in
Section 3.1(a) of the Holdings Disclosure Schedule.
Section 3.14 Opinion
of Financial Advisor. The Conflicts Committee
has received the written opinion of Barclays Capital, Inc.,
dated as of the date of this Agreement, to the effect that, as
of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration is fair to the
holders of Common Units (excluding Common Units owned by
Mr. Hamm, his Affiliates (including Continental Gas) and
the Trusts) from a financial point of view.
Section 3.15 Required
Approvals. Holdings GP has approved this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
and directed that this Agreement and the Merger be submitted to
a vote of Unitholders as required under
Section 17-211
of the DRULPA and under Articles XIII and XIV of the
Partnership Agreement; provided, however, that no
representation or warranty is made concerning whether the
consent of Holdings GP, to the extent reserved to Parent
pursuant to Section 7.1(d) of the Holdings GP LLC
Agreement, was validly adopted by Parent. The Board of
Directors, upon the unanimous recommendation of its Conflicts
Committee, at a meeting duly called and held, has,
(i) determined that this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby are advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of Holdings and the holders of Common Units (excluding
Common Units owned by Mr. Hamm, his Affiliates (including
Continental Gas) and the Trusts), (ii) approved the Merger
and this Agreement and (iii) recommended that this
Agreement and the Merger be approved by holders of Common Units
(excluding Common Units owned by Mr. Hamm, his Affiliates
(including Continental Gas) and the Trusts)(including the
Conflicts Committees recommendation, the
Recommendation).
Section 3.16 Material
Contracts.
(a) Except for this Agreement or as designated as an
exhibit to Holdings annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 or to a Holdings SEC
Document filed thereafter and prior to the date of this
Agreement, neither Holdings nor any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to or bound by, as of the date hereof, any Contract
(whether written or oral) which is a material
contract (as such term is defined in Item 601(b)(10)
of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC) (all contracts of the type described in this
Section 3.16(a) being referred to herein as
Material Contracts).
(b) (i) Each Material Contract to which a Holdings
Party is a party is valid and binding on such Holdings Party and
in full force and effect, except where the failure to be valid,
binding and in full force and effect, either individually or in
the aggregate, would not have a Holdings Material Adverse
Effect, (ii) each Holdings Party has in all material
respects performed all obligations required to be performed by
it under each Material Contract to which it is a party, except
where such noncompliance, either individually or in the
aggregate, would not have a Holdings Material Adverse Effect,
and (iii) no Holdings Party knows of, or has received
notice of, the existence of any event or condition which
constitutes, or, after notice or lapse of time or both, will
constitute, a material default on the part of any Holdings Party
under any such Material Contract, except where such default,
either individually or in the aggregate, would not have a
Holdings Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.17 State
Takeover Laws. No approvals are required
under state takeover or similar laws in connection with the
performance by the Holdings Parties or their Affiliates of their
obligations under this Agreement, the Support Agreement, the
Rollover Commitments or the transactions contemplated hereby or
thereby.
Section 3.18 Finders
or Brokers. Except for Barclays Capital,
Inc., none of the Holdings Parties (including through its
respective board of directors (or similar governing body) or any
committee thereof) has engaged any investment banker, broker or
finder in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement who would be entitled to any fee or any commission in
connection with or upon consummation of the Merger or the other
transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 3.19 No
Other Representations or Warranties. Except
for the representations and warranties contained in this
Article III and except as otherwise expressly set forth in
this Agreement or in the agreements
D-11
or certificates entered into in connection herewith or
contemplated hereby, none of the Holdings Parties nor any other
Person on behalf of the Holdings Parties makes any other
representation or warranty of any kind or nature, express or
implied, in connection with this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE IV
Representations
and Warranties of the Parent Parties
Except as disclosed in a section of the disclosure schedule
delivered concurrently herewith by Parent to the Holdings
Parties immediately prior to the execution of this Agreement
(the Parent Disclosure Schedule)
corresponding to the applicable sections of this Article IV
to which such disclosure applies (provided,
however, that any information set forth in one section of
such Parent Disclosure Schedule also shall be deemed to apply to
each other section of this Agreement to which its relevance is
reasonably apparent), the Parent Parties hereby represent and
warrant, jointly and severally, to the Holdings Parties as
follows:
Section 4.1 Qualification;
Organization.
(a) Each of the Parent Parties is a legal entity validly
existing and in good standing under the Laws of its respective
jurisdiction of formation. Each of the Parent Parties has all
requisite limited liability company power and authority to own,
lease and operate its properties and assets and to carry on its
business as presently conducted in all material respects.
(b) Each of the Parent Parties is duly registered or
qualified to do business and is in good standing as a foreign
limited liability company in each jurisdiction where the
ownership, leasing or operation of its assets or properties or
the conduct of its business requires such registration or
qualification, except where the failure to be so registered,
qualified or in good standing would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect. The
organizational or governing documents of the Parent Parties, as
previously made available to the Holdings Parties, are in full
force and effect. None of the Parent Parties is in violation of
its organizational or governing documents.
Section 4.2 Authority;
No Violation; Consents and Approvals.
(a) Each of the Parent Parties has all requisite limited
liability company power and authority to enter into this
Agreement and to carry out its obligations hereunder and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution,
delivery and performance by each Parent Party of this Agreement
and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
have been duly authorized by all requisite limited liability
company action on the part of such Parent Party, and no other
limited liability company proceedings on the part of a Parent
Party are necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement. Parent has, in its capacity as the sole
member of Holdings GP, duly authorized by all requisite limited
liability company action on the part of Parent, the execution,
delivery and performance by Holdings GP of this Agreement and
the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
each Parent Party and, assuming the due authorization, execution
and delivery hereof by the Holdings Parties, constitutes a
legal, valid and binding agreement of such Parent Party,
enforceable against such Parent Party in accordance with its
terms (except insofar as such enforceability may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization,
moratorium and similar laws relating to or affecting
creditors rights generally and by general principles of
equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered
in a proceeding in equity or at law)).
(c) Except for matters expressly contemplated by this
Agreement and matters described in clauses (ii), (iii) or
(iv) below that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, neither the
execution and delivery by the Parent Parties of this Agreement,
nor the consummation by the Parent Parties of the transactions
contemplated hereby and the performance by the Parent Parties of
this Agreement will (i) violate or conflict with any
provision of the governing documents of the Parent Parties;
(ii) require any consent, approval, authorization or permit
of, registration, declaration or filing with, or notification
to, any Governmental Entity or any other person;
(iii) result in any breach of or constitute a
D-12
default (or an event that, with notice or lapse of time or both,
would become a default) under, or give to others any right of
termination, cancellation, amendment or acceleration of any
obligation or the loss of any benefit under any agreement or
instrument to which any of the Parent Parties is a party or by
or to which any of their properties are bound; (iv) result
in the creation of an Encumbrance upon any of the assets of any
of the Parent Parties; or (v) violate or conflict in any
material respect with any material Law applicable to the Parent
Parties.
(d) Section 4.2(d) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule
identifies all material consents, approvals and authorizations
of any Governmental Entity or third party that are required to
be obtained by any Parent Parties in connection with
(1) the execution and delivery by the Parent Parties of
this Agreement or (2) the consummation by the Parent
Parties of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
except for such consents, approvals and authorizations that, if
not obtained, would not, individually or in the aggregate, have
a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.3 Proxy
Statement; Other Information. None of the
information supplied or to be supplied by the Parent Parties,
their controlling Affiliates, Continental Gas or the Trusts in
writing for inclusion in the Proxy Statement will at the time of
the mailing of the Proxy Statement to the Unitholders of
Holdings, at the time of the Partnership Meeting (as such Proxy
Statement shall have been amended or supplemented prior to the
date of the Partnership Meeting), and at the time of any
amendments thereof or supplements thereto, and none of the
information supplied or to be supplied by the Parent Parties,
their controlling Affiliates, Continental Gas or the Trusts in
writing for inclusion in the
Schedule 13E-3
to be filed with the SEC concurrently with the filing of the
Proxy Statement, will, at the time of its filing with the SEC,
and at the time of any amendments thereof or supplements
thereto, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state any material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
Section 4.4 Funding. On
the Closing Date, the Parent Parties will have sufficient cash
to enable them to make payment of the aggregate Merger
Consideration and the Parent Parties related fees and
expenses (the Funding). For the avoidance of
doubt, it shall not be a condition to the obligations of the
Parent Parties to effect the Merger for the Parent Parties to
obtain the Funding or any other financing of the Merger
Consideration and the Parent Parties related fees and
expenses. Section 4.4 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule
sets forth true, accurate and complete copies of
(i) executed equity commitment letters (the
Funding Commitments) to provide the Funding
to Parent or Merger Sub and (ii) the Rollover Commitments.
As of the date hereof, the Funding Commitments are in full force
and effect and have not been withdrawn or terminated or
otherwise amended or modified in any respect and none of the
Parent Parties is in breach of any of the terms or conditions
set forth therein and no event has occurred which, with or
without notice, lapse of time or both, could reasonably be
expected to constitute a material breach or failure to satisfy a
condition precedent set forth therein.
Section 4.5 Ownership
and Operations of Merger Sub. As of the date
of this Agreement, all of the issued and outstanding Merger Sub
LLC Interests are, and at the Effective Time will be, owned by
Parent, the Harold Hamm DST Trust and the Harold Hamm HJ Trust,
and such Merger Sub LLC Interests have been duly authorized and
validly issued in accordance with applicable Laws and the
limited liability company agreement of Merger Sub and are fully
paid (to the extent required by the limited liability company
agreement of Merger Sub) and nonassessable (except to the extent
such nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 18-607
and 18-804
of DLLCA). Merger Sub has not conducted any business other than
incident to its formation and pursuant to this Agreement, the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby and the
financing of such transactions.
Section 4.6 Finders
or Brokers. Except for Wachovia Capital
Markets, LLC, none of the Parent Parties has engaged any
investment banker, broker or finder in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement who might be
entitled to any fee or any commission in connection with or upon
consummation of the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated hereby.
D-13
Section 4.7 Access
to Information; No Other Representations or Warranties;
Disclaimer.
(a) Each of Parent and Merger Sub has conducted its own
investigations of the Holdings Group Entities and acknowledges
that it has been provided adequate access to the personnel,
properties, premises and records of the Holdings Group Entities
for such purpose.
(b) Except for the representations and warranties contained
in this Article IV and except as otherwise expressly set
forth in this Agreement or in the agreements or certificates
entered into in connection herewith or contemplated hereby, none
of the Parent Parties nor any other Person on behalf of the
Parent Parties makes any other representation or warranty of any
kind or nature, express or implied, in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(c) Except for the representations and warranties expressly
set forth in this Agreement or in the agreements or certificates
entered into in connection herewith or contemplated hereby,
neither Parent nor Merger Sub has relied on any representation
or warranty, express or implied, with respect to the Holdings
Group Entities or with respect to any other information provided
or made available to Parent or Merger Sub in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. None of the
Holdings Group Entities nor any other Person will have or be
subject to any liability or indemnification obligation to
Parent, Merger Sub or any other Person resulting from the
distribution to Parent or Merger Sub, or use by Parent or Merger
Sub of any such information, including any information,
documents, projections, forecasts or other material made
available to Parent or Merger Sub or management presentations in
expectation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE V
Covenants
and Agreements
Section 5.1 Conduct
of Business by Holdings and Parent.
(a) From and after the date hereof and prior to the
Effective Time or the date, if any, on which this Agreement is
earlier terminated pursuant to Article VII, and except
(i) as required by applicable Law, (ii) with the prior
written consent of Parent (which shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed), (iii) as expressly
provided for and permitted by this Agreement or (iv) as
disclosed in Section 5.1(a) of the Holdings Disclosure
Schedule, the Holdings Parties shall (A) conduct the
business of such Holdings Parties in the ordinary course
consistent with past practice, (B) use their commercially
reasonable efforts to maintain and preserve intact the present
business organizations and material rights and franchises of
such Holdings Group Entities, to keep available the services of
the current Employees and the current officers and consultants
of, or providing services to, the Holdings Group Entities, and
to maintain and preserve in all material respects the
relationships of such Holdings Group Entities with customers,
suppliers and others having business dealings with them, and
(C) take no action that would materially adversely affect
or delay the ability of any of the parties hereto from obtaining
any necessary approvals of any Governmental Entity required for
the transactions contemplated hereby, performing its covenants
and agreements under this Agreement or consummating the
transactions contemplated hereby or that would otherwise
materially delay or prohibit consummation of the Merger or other
transactions contemplated hereby; provided,
however, that any action taken or omitted to be taken by
an officer of a Holdings Party at the direction of any of the
Parent Parties or Mr. Hamm (other than (1) in his
capacity as part of, (2) in accordance with authority
delegated to him by, or (3) as otherwise authorized by, the
Board of Directors or any committee thereof) that would
otherwise constitute a breach of this Section 5.1 shall not
constitute such a breach.
(b) Without limiting the generality of Section 5.1(a),
the Holdings Parties agree that, except (i) as required by
applicable Law, (ii) with the prior written consent of
Parent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed), (iii) as expressly provided for and permitted by
this Agreement or (iv) as disclosed in Section 5.1(b)
of the Holdings Disclosure Schedule, the Holdings Parties will
not:
(i) make any change in any of their organizational or
governing documents, other than changes expressly provided for
in this Agreement;
D-14
(ii) issue, deliver or sell or authorize or propose the
issuance, delivery or sale of, any of their Partnership
Interests or equity securities or securities convertible into
their Partnership Interests or equity securities, or
subscriptions, rights, warrants or options to acquire or other
agreements or commitments of any character obligating any of
them to issue any such Partnership Interests or equity
securities (other than restricted units, phantom units or unit
options to current or newly-hired employees consistent with past
practice of up to 50,000 Common Units in the aggregate in
accordance with the Holdings LTIP);
(iii) except for any distributions from Holdings
Subsidiaries to Holdings, declare, set aside or pay any
distributions in respect of the Partnership Interests or other
ownership interests, or split, combine or reclassify any of the
Partnership Interests or other ownership interests or issue or
authorize the issuance of any other Partnership Interests or
other ownership interests in respect of, in lieu of or in
substitution for any of the Partnership Interests or other
ownership interests, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire,
directly or indirectly, any of the Partnership Interests or
other ownership interests other than repurchases of Partnership
Interests in accordance with the Holdings LTIP;
(iv) other than the Hiland Merger, merge into or with any
other Person;
(v) incur, assume or guarantee any indebtedness for
borrowed money, issue, assume or guarantee any debt securities,
grant any option, warrant or right to purchase any debt
securities, or issue any securities convertible into or
exchangeable for any debt securities other than in connection
with (A) borrowings in the ordinary course of business or
provided for in the Budget, in each case in accordance with any
existing bank credit facilities, (B) the refinancing or
replacement of existing indebtedness, (C) other than as
permitted by (A) and (B) above, the incurrence by
Holdings of up to $1,000,000 in principal amount of indebtedness
and (D) a transaction that is permitted by clause (vi);
(vi) (A) sell, assign, transfer, abandon, lease or
otherwise dispose of or (B) grant any security interest
with respect to, pledge or otherwise encumber (other than
Permitted Encumbrances) any limited liability company,
partnership or other equity interests of any Subsidiary or
Partially Owned Entity of the Holdings Parties (not including
Subsidiaries and Partially Owned Entities of Hiland);
(vii) (A) settle any claims, demands, lawsuits or
state or federal regulatory proceedings for damages to the
extent such settlements in the aggregate assess damages in
excess of $1,000,000 (other than any claims, demands, lawsuits
or proceedings to the extent insured (net of deductibles), to
the extent reserved against in the Holdings Financial Statements
or to the extent covered by an indemnity obligation not subject
to dispute or adjustment from a solvent indemnitor) or
(B) settle any claims, demands, lawsuits or state or
federal regulatory proceedings seeking an injunction or other
equitable relief where such settlements would have a Holdings
Material Adverse Effect;
(viii) make any material change in their tax methods,
principles or elections;
(ix) make any material change to their financial reporting
and accounting methods other than as required by a change in
GAAP;
(x) (A) grant any increases in the compensation of any
of their executive officers, except in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice or as required by the
terms of an existing Employee Benefit Plan or agreement or by
applicable Law, (B) amend any existing employment or
severance or termination contract with any executive officer,
(C) become obligated under any new pension plan, welfare
plan, multiemployer plan, Employee Benefit Plan, severance plan,
change of control or other benefit arrangement or similar plan
or arrangement, or (D) amend any Employee Benefit Plan, if
such amendment would have the effect of materially enhancing any
benefits thereunder;
(xi) voluntarily dissolve or otherwise adopt or vote to
adopt a plan of complete or partial dissolution or
liquidation; or
(xii) agree or commit to do any of the foregoing.
Section 5.2 Investigation. From
the date hereof until the Effective Time and subject to the
requirements of applicable Laws, the Holdings Parties shall
(a) provide to the Parent Parties and their respective
D-15
counsel, financial advisors, auditors and other authorized
representatives reasonable access during normal business hours
after reasonable prior notice to the offices, properties, books
and records of the Holdings Group Entities, (b) furnish to
the Parent Parties and their respective counsel, financial
advisors, auditors and other authorized representatives such
financial and operating data and other information as such
persons may reasonably request (including furnishing to Parent
the financial results of Holdings and its Subsidiaries in
advance of any filing by Holdings with the SEC or other public
disclosure containing such financial results), and
(c) instruct the employees, counsel, financial advisors,
auditors and other authorized representatives of the Holdings
Group Entities to cooperate with Parent in its investigation of
the Holdings Group Entities, as the case may be. Notwithstanding
the foregoing provisions of this Section 5.2, the Holdings
Parties shall not be required to, or to cause any of their
Subsidiaries to, grant access or furnish information to Parent
or any of its representatives to the extent that such
information is subject to an attorney/client or attorney work
product privilege or that such access or the furnishing of such
information is prohibited by Law or an existing contract or
agreement. Parent shall hold, and shall cause its counsel,
financial advisors, auditors and representatives to hold, any
material or competitively sensitive non-public information
concerning a Holdings Party received from a Holdings Party
confidential. Holdings GP will provide Parent (solely for
informational purposes) a true and complete copy of the opinion
referenced in Section 3.14 promptly after delivery thereof.
Any investigation pursuant to this Section 5.2 shall be
conducted in such manner as not to interfere unreasonably with
the conduct of the business of the Holdings Group Entities. No
information or knowledge obtained by Parent in any investigation
pursuant to this Section 5.2 shall affect or be deemed to
modify any representation or warranty made by the Holdings
Parties in Article III or any condition set forth in
Article VI.
Section 5.3 No
Solicitation.
(a) Subject to
Sections 5.3(b)-(h),
the Holdings Parties shall not, and shall cause their officers,
directors, employees, agents and representatives
(Representatives) not to, directly or
indirectly, (i) initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage
(including by providing information) or knowingly facilitate any
inquiries, proposals or offers with respect to, or the making or
completion of, an Alternative Proposal (as defined herein),
(ii) engage or participate in any negotiations concerning,
or provide or cause to be provided any non-public information or
data relating to, the Holdings Group Entities, in connection
with, or have any discussions with any person relating to, an
Alternative Proposal, or otherwise knowingly encourage or
knowingly facilitate any effort or attempt to make or implement
an Alternative Proposal, (iii) approve, endorse or
recommend, or propose publicly to approve, endorse or recommend,
any Alternative Proposal, (iv) approve, endorse or
recommend, or propose to approve, endorse or recommend, or
execute or enter into, any letter of intent, agreement in
principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option
agreement or other similar agreement relating to any Alternative
Proposal, (v) amend, terminate, waive or fail to enforce,
or grant any consent under, any confidentiality, standstill or
similar agreement or (vi) resolve to propose or agree to do
any of the foregoing.
(b) The Holdings Parties shall, and shall cause their
Representatives to, immediately cease any existing
solicitations, discussions or negotiations with any Person
(other than the parties hereto) that has made or indicated an
intention to make an Alternative Proposal. The Holdings Parties
shall promptly, and in any event not later than ten
(10) days following the date hereof, request that each
Person who has executed a confidentiality agreement with a
Holdings Party in connection with that Persons
consideration of a transaction involving any Holdings Group
Entity that would constitute an Alternative Proposal return or
destroy all non-public information furnished to that Person by
or on behalf of the Holdings Group Entities.
(c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
Section 5.3(a), prior to the receipt of Unitholder
Approval, the Holdings Parties may, in response to an
unsolicited Alternative Proposal which did not result from or
arise in connection with a breach of this Section 5.3 and
which the Conflicts Committee determines, in good faith, after
consultation with its outside counsel and financial advisors,
constitutes or could reasonably be expected to result in a
Superior Proposal (as defined herein), (i) furnish
information with respect to the Holdings Group Entities to the
person making such Alternative Proposal and its Representatives
pursuant to an executed confidentiality agreement no less
restrictive (including with respect to standstill provisions) of
the other party than the Confidentiality Agreement and
(ii) participate in discussions or negotiations with such
person and its Representatives regarding such Alternative
Proposal; provided, however, (A) that Parent
shall be entitled to receive an executed copy of such
confidentiality agreement prior to or substantially
simultaneously
D-16
with the Holdings Parties furnishing information to the person
making such Alternative Proposal or its Representatives and
(B) that the Holdings Parties shall simultaneously provide
or make available to Parent any non-public information
concerning the Holdings Group Entities that is provided to the
person making such Alternative Proposal or its Representatives
which was not previously provided or made available to Parent.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 5.3(a),
prior to the receipt of Unitholder Approval, the Holdings
Parties may participate in discussions or negotiations with the
lenders under the Holdings Credit Agreement or the Hiland
Operating Credit Agreement regarding debt financing transactions
with such lenders that may involve equity issuances that would
constitute an Alternative Proposal and, in connection therewith,
furnish information with respect to the Holdings Group Entities
to such lenders pursuant to confidentiality obligations
substantially consistent with past practice.
(d) Neither the Board of Directors nor any committee
thereof shall withdraw, modify or qualify in a manner adverse to
Parent, or resolve to or publicly propose to withdraw, modify or
qualify in a manner adverse to Parent, the Recommendation (any
of the foregoing actions, whether taken by the Board of
Directors or any committee thereof, a Change in Board
Recommendation). Notwithstanding the immediately
preceding sentence, if, prior to receipt of the Unitholder
Approval, (i) the Board of Directors or the Conflicts
Committee determines in good faith, after consultation with its
respective outside counsel and financial advisors, that a Change
in Board Recommendation would be in the best interests of the
holders of Common Units (other than Mr. Hamm, his
Affiliates (including Continental Gas) and the Trusts) and
(ii) the Board of Directors or the Conflicts Committee, as
applicable, provides Parent with at least three
(3) Business Days advance written notice of its
intention to make a Change in Board Recommendation and
specifying the material events giving rise thereto, then the
Board of Directors or the Conflicts Committee, as applicable,
may make a Change in Board Recommendation.
(e) The Holdings Parties promptly (and in any event within
24 hours) shall advise Parent orally and in writing of the
receipt by either of them of (i) any Alternative Proposal
or (ii) any request for non-public information relating to
the Holdings Group Entities, other than requests for information
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
and not reasonably expected to be related to an Alternative
Proposal, including in each case the identity of the person
making any such Alternative Proposal or request and the material
terms and conditions of any such Alternative Proposal or request
(including copies of any document or correspondence evidencing
such Alternative Proposal or request). The Holdings Parties
shall keep Parent reasonably informed on a current basis of the
status (including any material change to the terms thereof) of
any such Alternative Proposal or request.
(f) Nothing contained in this Agreement shall prohibit the
Holdings Parties or the Board of Directors or any committee
thereof from disclosing to Holdings Unitholders a position
contemplated by
Rules 14d-9
and 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act; provided,
however, that none of the Holdings Parties or the Board
of Directors or any committee thereof shall in any event be
entitled to disclose a position under
Rules 14d-9
or 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act other than the
Recommendation, except in accordance with Section 5.3(d).
(g) As used in this Agreement, Alternative
Proposal shall mean any inquiry, proposal or offer
from any Person or group of Persons other than the Parent
Parties relating to, or that could reasonably be expected to
lead to, in one transaction or a series of related transactions,
(i) a merger, tender or exchange offer, consolidation,
reorganization, reclassification, recapitalization, liquidation
or dissolution, or other business combination involving any
Holdings Group Entity, (ii) the issuance by Holdings or
Hiland of (A) any General Partner Interest or (B) any
class of Partnership Interests constituting more than 15% of
such class of Partnership Interests or (iii) the
acquisition in any manner, directly or indirectly, of
(A) any General Partner Interest of Holdings or Hiland,
(B) any class of Partnership Interests of Holdings or
Hiland constituting more than 15% of such class of Partnership
Interests or (C) more than 15% of the consolidated total
assets of the Holdings Group Entities (including equity
interests in any Subsidiary or Partially Owned Entity of
Holdings), in each case other than the Merger and the Hiland
Merger. References in this paragraph to General Partner Interest
or Partnership Interests with respect to Hiland shall be to such
interests as defined in the agreement of limited partnership of
Hiland.
D-17
(h) As used in this Agreement, Superior
Proposal shall mean any written Alternative Proposal
(i) on terms which the Conflicts Committee determines in
good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel
and financial advisors, to be more favorable from a financial
point of view to the holders of Common Units (other than
Mr. Hamm, his Affiliates (including Continental Gas) and
the Trusts) (excluding consideration of any interests that any
holder may have other than as a Unitholder of Holdings entitled
to the Merger Consideration) than the Merger, taking into
account all the terms and conditions of such proposal, and this
Agreement (including any proposal or offer by the Parent Parties
to amend the terms of this Agreement and the Merger) and
(ii) that is reasonably capable of being completed, taking
into account all financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects
of such proposal; provided that for purposes of the
definition Superior Proposal, the references to
15% in the definition of Alternative
Proposal shall be deemed to be references to
35% with respect to the Holdings Parties and,
consistent with the provisions of Section 5.3(h) of the
Hiland Agreement, 55% with respect to the Hiland
Parties and the Subsidiaries and Partially Owned Entities of
Hiland.
Section 5.4 Filings;
Other Actions.
(a) As promptly as reasonably practicable following the
date of this Agreement, the Holdings Parties shall prepare the
Proxy Statement, which shall, subject to Section 5.3(d),
include the Recommendation, and the Holdings Parties and Parent
shall prepare the
Schedule 13E-3.
Parent and the Holdings Parties shall cooperate with each other
in connection with the preparation of the foregoing documents.
The Holdings Parties will use their commercially reasonable
efforts to have the Proxy Statement, and Parent and the Holdings
Parties will use their commercially reasonable efforts to have
the
Schedule 13E-3,
cleared by the SEC as promptly as practicable after such filing.
The Holdings Parties will use their commercially reasonable
efforts to cause the Proxy Statement to be mailed to
Holdings Unitholders as promptly as practicable after the
Proxy Statement is cleared by the SEC. The Holdings Parties
shall as promptly as practicable notify Parent of the receipt of
any oral or written comments from the SEC relating to the Proxy
Statement or
Schedule 13E-3.
The Holdings Parties shall cooperate and provide Parent with a
reasonable opportunity to review and comment on the draft of the
Proxy Statement (including each amendment or supplement
thereto), which comments shall be considered reasonably and in
good faith by the Holdings Parties, and Parent and the Holdings
Parties shall cooperate and provide each other with a reasonable
opportunity to review and comment on the draft
Schedule 13E-3
(including each amendment or supplement thereto), which comments
shall be considered reasonably and in good faith by the other
party, and all responses to requests for additional information
by and replies to comments of the SEC, prior to filing such with
or sending such to the SEC, and Parent and the Holdings Parties
will provide each other with copies of all such filings made and
correspondence with the SEC with respect thereto. If at any time
prior to the Effective Time, any information should be
discovered by any party hereto which should be set forth in an
amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement or the
Schedule 13E-3
so that the Proxy Statement or the
Schedule 13E-3
would not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to
state any material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, the
party which discovers such information shall promptly notify the
other parties hereto and, to the extent required by applicable
Law, an appropriate amendment or supplement describing such
information shall be promptly filed by the Holdings Parties with
the SEC and disseminated by the Holdings Parties to the
Unitholders of Holdings.
(b) The Holdings Parties shall (i) take all action
necessary in accordance with applicable Laws and the Partnership
Agreement to duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a
meeting of Holdings Unitholders as promptly as reasonably
practicable following the mailing of the Proxy Statement for the
purpose of obtaining the Unitholder Approval of the Merger and
this Agreement (such meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof, the Partnership Meeting), and
(ii) subject to a Change in Board Recommendation in
accordance with Section 5.3(d), use all commercially
reasonable efforts to solicit from its Unitholders proxies in
favor of the adoption and approval of this Agreement and the
Merger. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, unless this Agreement is terminated in accordance with
Article VII, the Holdings Parties will take all of the
actions contemplated by this Section 5.4 regardless of
whether there has been a Change in
D-18
Board Recommendation, and shall direct that this Agreement be
submitted to a vote of Unitholders in accordance with the
requirements of Articles XIII and XIV of the Partnership
Agreement.
Section 5.5 Equity
Awards. The Holdings LTIP and each award of
Restricted Units (except as expressly provided otherwise in
Section 2.1(a) with respect to awards held by nonemployee
members of the Board of Directors), Phantom Units (as defined in
the Holdings LTIP) and Options (as defined in the Holdings LTIP)
outstanding under the Holdings LTIP immediately prior to the
Effective Time will remain outstanding in accordance with its
terms as a plan or equity compensation award, as applicable, of
the Surviving Entity and shall be unaffected by the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. Prior to the Effective Time,
Holdings shall take any action necessary pursuant to the
Holdings LTIP to achieve this result.
Section 5.6 Efforts.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement, each of the parties hereto shall use their
commercially reasonable efforts (subject to, and in accordance
with, applicable Law) to take promptly, or to cause to be taken,
all actions, and to do promptly, or to cause to be done, and to
assist and to cooperate with the other parties in doing, all
things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make
effective the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby, including (i) the obtaining of all necessary
actions or nonactions, waivers, consents and approvals from
Governmental Entities and the making of all necessary
registrations and filings and the taking of all steps as may be
necessary to obtain an approval or waiver from, or to avoid an
action or proceeding by, any Governmental Entity, (ii) the
obtaining of all necessary consents, approvals or waivers from
third parties, (iii) the defending of any lawsuits or other
legal proceedings, whether judicial or administrative,
challenging this Agreement or the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby and (iv) the execution and
delivery of any additional instruments reasonably necessary to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. In addition,
Parent shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the
Funding in accordance with the Funding Commitments.
(b) Subject to the terms and conditions herein provided and
without limiting the foregoing, the Holdings Parties and the
Parent Parties shall (i) if required, as promptly as
practicable after the date hereof, make their respective filings
and thereafter make any other required submissions under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C.
§ 18a, as amended (the HSR Act),
(ii) use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with
each other in (x) determining whether any filings are
required to be made with, or consents, permits, authorizations,
waivers or approvals are required to be obtained from, any third
parties or other Governmental Entities in connection with the
execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby and (y) timely making
all such filings and timely seeking all such consents, permits,
authorizations or approvals, (iii) use commercially
reasonable efforts to take, or to cause to be taken, all other
actions and to do, or to cause to be done, all other things
necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make effective
the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby,
including taking all such further action as reasonably may be
necessary to resolve such objections, if any, as the United
States Federal Trade Commission, the Antitrust Division of the
United States Department of Justice, state or foreign antitrust
enforcement authorities or competition authorities, other
Governmental Entities in connection with the HSR Act, or other
state or federal regulatory authorities of any other nation or
other jurisdiction or any other person may assert under
Regulatory Law (as defined herein) with respect to the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated hereby, and to avoid or
eliminate each and every impediment under any Law that may be
asserted by any Governmental Entity with respect to the Merger
so as to enable the Closing to occur as soon as reasonably
possible (and in any event no later than the End Date), and
(iv) subject to applicable legal limitations and the
instructions of any Governmental Entity, use commercially
reasonable efforts to keep each other apprised of the status of
matters relating to the completion of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including to the extent
permitted by Law promptly furnishing the other with copies of
notices or other communications received by the Holdings Parties
or any of their Subsidiaries or the Parent Parties, as the case
may be, from any third party
and/or any
Governmental Entity with respect thereto.
(c) Subject to the rights of the Parent Parties in
Section 5.11, and in furtherance and not in limitation of
the covenants of the parties contained in this Section 5.6,
if any administrative or judicial action or proceeding,
D-19
including any proceeding by a private party, is instituted (or
threatened to be instituted) challenging the Merger or any other
transaction contemplated by this Agreement, each of the Holdings
Parties or the Parent Parties shall cooperate in all respects
with each other and shall use their respective commercially
reasonable efforts to contest and resist any such action or
proceeding and to have vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned
any decree, judgment, injunction or other order, whether
temporary, preliminary or permanent, that is in effect and that
prohibits, prevents or restricts consummation of the Merger or
any other transactions contemplated hereby. Notwithstanding the
foregoing or any other provision of this Agreement, nothing in
this Section 5.6 shall limit a partys right to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(b)(i) or
(ii) so long as such party has, prior to such termination,
complied with its obligations under this Section 5.6.
(d) The Parent Parties and the Holdings Parties may, as
each deems advisable and necessary, reasonably designate any
competitively sensitive material provided to the other under
this Section 5.6 as Regulatory Counsel Only
Material. Such materials and the information contained
therein shall be given only to the outside regulatory counsel of
the recipient and will not be disclosed by such outside counsel
to employees, officers or directors of the recipient unless
express written permission is obtained in advance from the
source of the materials (the Parent Parties or the Holdings
Parties as the case may be) or its legal counsel.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Section 5.6, materials provided to the other party or its
outside counsel may be redacted to remove references concerning
the valuation of the Common Units or the business of the
Holdings Group Entities. For purposes of this Agreement,
Regulatory Law means any and all state,
federal and foreign statutes, rules, regulations, orders,
decrees, administrative and judicial doctrines and other Laws
requiring notice to, filings with, or the consent or approval
of, any Governmental Entity, or that otherwise may cause any
restriction, in connection with the Merger and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including (i) the Sherman Act of
1890, the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, the HSR Act, the
Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 and all other Laws that are
designed or intended to prohibit, restrict or regulate actions
having the purpose or effect of monopolization or restraint of
trade or lessening competition through merger or acquisition,
(ii) any Law governing any of the material operations or
assets of Holdings and its Subsidiaries or (iii) any Law
with the purpose of protecting the national security or the
national economy of any nation.
Section 5.7 Takeover
Statute. Subject to Section 5.3(d), if
any fair price, moratorium,
control share acquisition or other form of
anti-takeover statute or regulation shall become applicable to
the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, the Support Agreement or the Rollover Commitments,
each of the Holdings Parties or the Parent Parties shall grant
such approvals and take such actions as are reasonably necessary
so that the Merger, the Support Agreement, the Rollover
Commitments and the other transactions contemplated hereby and
thereby may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the
terms contemplated herein and otherwise act to eliminate or
minimize the effects of such statute or regulation on the
Merger, the Support Agreement, the Rollover Commitments and the
other transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.
Section 5.8 Public
Announcements. Subject to
Section 5.3(d), the Holdings Parties and the Parent Parties
will consult with and provide each other the opportunity to
review and comment (which shall be considered reasonably and in
good faith by the other parties) upon any press release or other
public statement or comment prior to the issuance of such press
release or other public statement or comment relating to this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated herein and shall not
issue any such press release or other public statement or
comment prior to such consultation and opportunity to review and
comment except as may be required by applicable Law or by
obligations pursuant to any listing agreement with any national
securities exchange; provided, however, that any
public statement or disclosure that is consistent with a public
statement or disclosure previously approved by the other party
shall not require the prior approval of such other party. The
Holdings Parties and the Parent Parties agree to issue a joint
press release announcing the execution and delivery of this
Agreement.
Section 5.9 Indemnification
and Insurance.
(a) The partnership agreement of the Surviving Entity
shall, with respect to indemnification of directors and
officers, not be amended, repealed or otherwise modified after
the Effective Time in any manner that
D-20
would adversely affect the rights thereunder of the Persons who
at any time prior to the Effective Time were identified as
prospective indemnitees under the Partnership Agreement in
respect of actions or omissions occurring at or prior to the
Effective Time (including the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement).
(b) For a period of six years after the Effective Time,
Parent and Holdings GP shall, and Parent and Holdings GP shall
cause the Surviving Entity (and its successors or assigns) to,
maintain officers and directors liability insurance
covering each person who is immediately prior to the Effective
Time, or has been at any time prior to the Effective Time, an
officer or director of any of the Holdings Group Entities and
each person who immediately prior to the Effective Time is
serving or prior to the Effective Time has served at the request
of any of the Holdings Group Entities as a director, officer,
trustee or fiduciary of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust, pension or other Employee Benefit Plan of the
Holdings Group Entities (collectively, the Holdings
D&O Indemnified Parties) who are or at any time
prior to the Effective Time were covered by the existing
officers and directors liability insurance
applicable to the Holdings Group Entities (D&O
Insurance) on terms substantially no less advantageous
to the Holdings D&O Indemnified Parties than such existing
insurance with respect to acts or omissions, or alleged acts or
omissions, prior to the Effective Time (whether claims, actions
or other proceedings relating thereto are commenced, asserted or
claimed before or after the Effective Time).
(c) Holdings shall cause (and Parent, following the
Closing, shall continue to cause) coverage to be extended under
the D&O Insurance by obtaining a six-year tail
policy on terms and conditions no less advantageous than the
existing D&O Insurance, and such tail policy
shall satisfy the provisions of this Section 5.9;
provided that in no event shall Parent be required to
spend more than 250% (the Cap Amount) of the
last annual premium paid by the Holdings Group Entities prior to
the date hereof (the amount of such premium being set forth in
Section 5.9(c) of the Holdings Disclosure Schedule) per
policy year of coverage under such tail policy;
provided, further, that if the cost per policy
year of such insurance exceeds the Cap Amount, Parent shall
purchase as much coverage per policy year as reasonably
obtainable for the Cap Amount.
(d) The rights of each Holdings D&O Indemnified Party
hereunder shall be in addition to any other rights such Holdings
D&O Indemnified Party may have under the governing
documents of any Holdings Group Entity under applicable Delaware
Law or otherwise. The provisions of this Section 5.9 shall
survive the consummation of the Merger and expressly are
intended to benefit each of the Holdings D&O Indemnified
Parties.
(e) In the event Parent, Holdings GP or any of their
respective successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or
merges into any other person and shall not be the continuing or
surviving entity in such consolidation or merger or
(ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties
and assets to any person, then and in either such case, Parent
or Holdings GP, as the case may be, shall cause proper provision
to be made so that its successors or assigns shall assume the
obligations set forth in this Section 5.9.
Section 5.10 Unitholder
Litigation. The Holdings Parties shall give
Parent the opportunity to participate in the defense or
settlement of any Unitholder litigation against any of the
Holdings Group Entities
and/or their
respective directors relating to the Merger or any other
transactions contemplated hereby and no such settlement shall in
any event be agreed to without Parents consent (which
shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed).
Section 5.11 Notification
of Certain Matters. The Holdings Parties
shall give prompt notice to the Parent Parties, and the Parent
Parties shall give prompt notice to the Holdings Parties, of
(i) any notice or other communication received by such
party from any Governmental Entity in connection with the Merger
or the other transactions contemplated hereby or from any person
alleging that the consent of such person is or may be required
in connection with the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated hereby, if the subject matter of such communication
or the failure of such party to obtain such consent could be
material to Holdings, the Surviving Entity or Parent,
(ii) any actions, suits, claims, investigations or
proceedings commenced or, to such partys Knowledge,
threatened against, relating to or involving or otherwise
affecting such party or any of its Subsidiaries which relate to
the Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby,
(iii) the discovery of any fact or circumstance that, or
the occurrence or non-occurrence of any event the
D-21
occurrence or non-occurrence of which, would, individually or in
the aggregate, cause or result in a Holdings Material Adverse
Effect or a Parent Material Adverse Effect, respectively;
provided, however, that the delivery of any notice
pursuant to this Section 5.11 shall not (x) cure any
breach of, or non-compliance with, any other provision of this
Agreement or (y) limit the remedies available to the party
receiving such notice. The Holdings Parties shall reasonably
cooperate with the Parent Parties in efforts to mitigate any
adverse consequences to the Parent Parties which may arise from
any criminal or regulatory investigation or action involving any
of the Holdings Group Entities (including by coordinating and
providing assistance in meeting with regulators).
Section 5.12 Rule 16b-3. Prior
to the Effective Time, Holdings shall take such steps as may be
reasonably requested by any party hereto to cause dispositions
of Partnership equity securities (including derivative
securities) pursuant to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement by each individual who is a director or officer of
Holdings to be exempt under
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act in accordance with that
certain No-Action Letter dated January 12, 1999 issued by
the SEC regarding such matters.
ARTICLE VI
Conditions
to the Merger
Section 6.1 Conditions
to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the
Merger. The respective obligations of each
party to effect the Merger shall be subject to the fulfillment
(or waiver by all parties) at or prior to the Effective Time of
each of the following conditions:
(a) the Unitholder Approval of this Agreement and the
Merger shall have been obtained;
(b) no restraining order, preliminary or permanent
injunction or other order issued by any court of competent
jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition enacted or
promulgated by any Governmental Entity restraining, enjoining or
otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Merger shall be in
effect; and
(c) any waiting period under the HSR Act applicable to the
consummation of the Merger shall have expired or been earlier
terminated.
Section 6.2 Conditions
to Obligation of the Holdings Parties to Effect the
Merger. The obligations of the Holdings
Parties to effect the Merger are further subject to the
fulfillment at or prior to the Effective Time of each of the
following conditions, any one or more of which may be waived in
whole or in part by the Holdings Parties:
(a) (i) the representations and warranties of the
Parent Parties contained in Section 4.1(a) (Qualification;
Organization) and Section 4.2 (Authority; No Violation;
Consents and Approvals) shall be true and correct in all
respects, in each case at and as of the date of this Agreement
and at and as of the Closing Date as though made at and as of
the Closing Date and (ii) the representations and
warranties of the Parent Parties set forth in this Agreement
(other than those referenced in clause (i) of this
paragraph) shall be true and correct in all respects
(disregarding any materiality or Parent Material Adverse Effect
qualifiers therein) at and as of the date of this Agreement and
at and as of the Closing Date as though made at and as of the
Closing Date, except where any failures of such representations
or warranties to be so true and correct would not have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse
Effect; provided, however, that, with respect to
clauses (i) and (ii) of this paragraph,
representations and warranties that are made as of a particular
date or period shall be true and correct (in the manner set
forth in clause (i) or (ii), as applicable) only as of such
date or period;
(b) the Parent Parties shall have performed all obligations
and complied with all covenants required by this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by them that are qualified by
materiality or Parent Material Adverse Effect and shall have in
all material respects performed all other obligations and
complied with all other covenants required by this Agreement to
be performed or complied with by them; and
D-22
(c) Parent shall have delivered to the Holdings Parties a
certificate, dated the Effective Time and signed by its Chief
Executive Officer or another senior executive officer,
certifying to the effect that the conditions set forth in
Sections 6.2(a) and 6.2(b) have been satisfied.
Section 6.3 Conditions
to Obligation of the Parent Parties to Effect the
Merger. The obligations of the Parent Parties
to effect the Merger are further subject to the fulfillment at
or prior to the Effective Time of each of the following
conditions, any one or more of which may be waived in whole or
in part by the Parent Parties:
(a) (i) the representations and warranties of the
Holdings Parties contained in Section 3.1(b)
(Qualification, Organization, Subsidiaries, Etc.),
Section 3.2 (Capitalization), Section 3.3 (Authority;
No Violation; Consents and Approvals), Section 3.8(b)
(Absence of Certain Changes or Events) and Section 3.15
(Required Approvals) shall be true and correct in all respects,
except, in the case of Section 3.2, for such inaccuracies
as are de minimis in the aggregate, in each case at and
as of the date of this Agreement and at and as of the Closing
Date as though made at and as of the Closing Date and
(ii) the representations and warranties of the Holdings
Parties set forth in this Agreement (other than those referenced
in clause (i) of this paragraph) shall be true and correct
in all respects (disregarding any materiality or Holdings
Material Adverse Effect qualifiers therein) as of the date of
this Agreement and at and as of the Closing Date as though made
at and as of the Closing Date, except where any failures of such
representations or warranties to be so true and correct would
not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Holdings Material
Adverse Effect; provided, however, that, with
respect to clauses (i) and (ii) of this paragraph,
representations and warranties that are made as of a particular
date or period shall be true and correct (in the manner set
forth in clause (i) or (ii), as applicable) only as of such
date or period; provided, further, that the
representations and warranties referenced in clauses (i)
and (ii) shall not be deemed to be inaccurate to the extent
that Parent had knowledge at the Execution Date of such
inaccuracy;
(b) the Holdings Parties shall have performed all
obligations and complied with all covenants required by this
Agreement to be performed or complied with by them that are
qualified by materiality or Holdings Material Adverse Effect and
shall have in all material respects performed all other
obligations and complied with all other covenants required by
this Agreement to be performed or complied with by them;
(c) since the date of this Agreement there shall not have
been any Holdings Material Adverse Effect;
(d) the Hiland Merger shall be effectuated concurrently
with the Merger; provided that the Parent Parties may not
waive this condition unless the Hiland Agreement and the Hiland
Merger shall have been submitted to a vote of Unitholders and
the outcome of such vote shall not have constituted a Unitholder
Approval; provided, further, that for purposes of
this clause 6.3(d), the terms Unitholders and
Unitholder Approval shall have the meanings assigned
to them in the Hiland Agreement; and
(e) the Holdings Parties shall have delivered to the Parent
Parties a certificate, dated the Effective Time and signed by an
executive officer of Holdings, certifying to the effect that the
conditions set forth in Sections 6.3(a), 6.3(b) and 6.3(c)
have been satisfied.
Section 6.4 Frustration of
Conditions. No party may rely on the failure
of any condition set forth in Section 6.1, 6.2 or 6.3, as
the case may be, to be satisfied if such failure was caused by
such partys breach in any material respect of any
provision of this Agreement or failure to use commercially
reasonable efforts to consummate the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby, as required by and subject to
Section 5.6.
D-23
ARTICLE VII
Termination
Section 7.1 Termination or
Abandonment. Notwithstanding anything
contained in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement may
be terminated and abandoned at any time prior to the Effective
Time, whether before or after any approval of the matters
presented in connection with the Merger by the Unitholders of
Holdings:
(a) by the mutual written consent of the Holdings Parties
and the Parent Parties;
(b) by either the Holdings Parties or the Parent Parties,
if:
(i) the Effective Time shall not have occurred on or before
November 1, 2009 (the End Date) and the
party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 7.1(b)(i) shall not have breached its obligations
under this Agreement in any manner that shall have proximately
caused the failure to consummate the Merger on or before the End
Date;
(ii) an injunction, other legal restraint or order of any
Governmental Entity shall have been entered permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation
of the Merger and such injunction, other legal restraint or
order shall have become final and nonappealable; provided
that the party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to
this Section 7.1(b)(ii) shall have complied in all material
respects with its obligations in Section 5.6; or
(iii) the Partnership Meeting shall have concluded and,
upon a vote taken at such meeting, the Unitholder Approval of
this Agreement or the Merger shall not have been obtained;
provided that the right to terminate this Agreement
pursuant to this Section 7.1(b)(iii) shall not be available
(A) to the Holdings Parties if any Holdings Party
materially breached any obligations under Section 5.3 or
5.4 or (B) to the Parent Parties if Mr. Hamm,
Continental Gas or the Trusts materially breached any of their
obligations under Article II of the Support Agreement;
(c) by the Holdings Parties, if any Parent Party shall have
breached or failed to perform any of its representations,
warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in this
Agreement, which breach or failure to perform: (A) would
constitute the failure of a condition set forth in
Section 6.2(a) or 6.2(b) and (B)(I) is not capable of being
satisfied or cured by the End Date or (II) if capable of
being satisfied or cured, is not satisfied or cured by thirty
(30) days following receipt by Parent of written notice
stating the Holdings Parties intention to terminate this
Agreement pursuant to this Section 7.1(c) and the basis for
such termination; provided that the right to terminate
this Agreement pursuant to this paragraph shall not be available
to the Holdings Parties if, at such time, a condition set forth
in Section 6.3(a), 6.3(b) or 6.3(c) is not capable of being
satisfied; or
(d) by the Parent Parties, if:
(i) any Holdings Party shall have breached or failed to
perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or
other agreements contained in this Agreement, which breach or
failure to perform: (A) would constitute the failure of a
condition set forth in Section 6.3(a), 6.3(b) or 6.3(c) and
(B)(I) is not capable of being satisfied or cured by the End
Date or (II) if capable of being satisfied or cured, is not
satisfied or cured by thirty (30) days following receipt by
the Holdings Parties of written notice stating the Parent
Parties intention to terminate this Agreement pursuant to
this Section 7.1(d)(i) and the basis for such termination;
provided that the right to terminate this Agreement
pursuant to this paragraph shall not be available to the Parent
Parties if, at such time, a condition set forth in
Section 6.2(a) or 6.2(b) is not capable of being satisfied;
(ii) a Change in Board Recommendation or a failure to make
the Recommendation occurs or the Board of Directors or any
committee thereof approves, endorses or recommends, or resolves
to or publicly proposes to approve, endorse or recommend, any
Alternative Proposal, including in any disclosure made pursuant
to
Rule 14d-9
or 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act; or
(iii) the condition set forth in Section 6.3(d) is not
capable of being satisfied by the End Date.
D-24
In the event of termination of this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 7.1, this Agreement shall terminate (except for the
provisions of Section 7.2 and Article VIII), and there
shall be no liability on the part of the Holdings Parties or the
Parent Parties to the other except as provided in
Section 7.2 and Article VIII and except that no such
termination shall relieve any party from liability arising out
of any willful breach of any of the representations, warranties
or covenants in this Agreement (subject to any express
limitations set forth in this Agreement), in which case the
aggrieved party shall be entitled to all rights and remedies
available at law or in equity.
Section 7.2 Reimbursement
of Certain Expenses.
(a) In the event that:
(i) (A) an Alternative Proposal shall have been made
known to the Holdings Parties or shall have been made directly
to the Unitholders generally or any person shall have publicly
announced an intention (whether or not conditional or withdrawn)
to make an Alternative Proposal and thereafter, (B) this
Agreement is terminated by the Holdings Parties or the Parent
Parties (as applicable) pursuant to Section 7.1(b)(i),
7.1(b)(iii) or 7.1(d)(i), and (C) a Holdings Party enters
into a definitive agreement with respect to, or consummates, a
transaction contemplated by any Alternative Proposal within
twelve (12) months of the date this Agreement is
terminated; or
(ii) this Agreement is terminated by the Parent Parties
pursuant to Section 7.1(d)(ii);
then in any such event under clause (i) or (ii) of
this Section 7.2(a), Holdings shall pay to Parent all of
the Expenses of the Parent Parties, provided that in no
event shall Holdings be required to pay for Expenses in any
amount in excess of $800,000; provided further, that no
expense for which a Parent Party has received reimbursement
pursuant to the Hiland Agreement shall be paid hereunder. As
used herein, Expenses shall mean all
out-of-pocket fees and expenses (including all fees and expenses
of counsel, accountants, consultants, financial advisors and
investment bankers of Parent and its Affiliates (other than the
Holdings Group Entities)) incurred by Parent and its Affiliates
(other than the Holdings Group Entities) or on their behalf in
connection with or related to the authorization, preparation,
negotiation, execution and performance of this Agreement and the
Funding and all other matters related to the Merger.
(b) Any payment required to be made pursuant to
Section 7.2(a) shall be made to Parent not later than two
(2) Business Days after delivery to Holdings of an
itemization setting forth in reasonable detail all Expenses of
the Parent Parties for which payment pursuant to
Section 7.2(a) is sought (which itemization may be
supplemented and updated from time to time by Parent until the
sixtieth (60th) day after delivery of such notice of demand for
payment). All such payments shall be made by wire transfer of
immediately available funds to an account to be designated by
Parent.
(c) Holdings acknowledges that the Expense reimbursement
and the other provisions of this Section 7.2 are an
integral part of the Merger and that, without these agreements,
Parent would not enter into this Agreement.
ARTICLE VIII
Miscellaneous
Section 8.1 No
Survival of Representations and
Warranties. None of the representations and
warranties in this Agreement or in any instrument delivered
pursuant to this Agreement shall survive the Merger.
Section 8.2 Hiland
Merger. Parent hereby covenants and agrees
that it shall not close the Hiland Merger unless the Merger has
closed prior to or is closing concurrently with the Hiland
Merger; provided, however, that such restriction
shall not apply if this Agreement and the Merger shall have been
submitted to a vote of Unitholders and the outcome of such vote
shall not have constituted a Unitholder Approval.
D-25
Section 8.3 Expenses. Except
as set forth in Section 7.2, whether or not the Merger is
consummated, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with
the Merger, this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby shall be paid by the party incurring or required to incur
such expenses.
Section 8.4 Counterparts;
Effectiveness. This Agreement may be executed
in two or more counterparts (including by facsimile), each of
which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the
signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument, and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been
signed by each of the parties and delivered (by telecopy or
otherwise) to the other parties.
Section 8.5 Governing
Law. This Agreement, and all claims or causes
of action (whether at law, in contract or in tort) that may be
based upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement or the
negotiation, execution or performance hereof, shall be governed
by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Delaware, without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law
provision or rule (whether of the State of Delaware or any other
jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of
any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware.
Section 8.6 Specific
Performance; Jurisdiction; Enforcement. The
parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event
that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed
in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise
breached. It is accordingly agreed that prior to the termination
of this Agreement in accordance with Article VII the
parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to
prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically
the terms and provisions of this Agreement exclusively in the
Delaware Court of Chancery (or a proper Delaware state court if
the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction)
or the federal courts sitting in the State of Delaware, this
being in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled
at law or in equity. In connection with any request for specific
performance or equitable relief by any party hereto, each of the
other parties waive any requirement for the security or posting
of any bond in connection with such remedy. In addition, each of
the parties hereto irrevocably agrees that any legal action or
proceeding with respect to this Agreement and the rights and
obligations arising hereunder, or for recognition and
enforcement of any judgment in respect of this Agreement and the
rights and obligations arising hereunder brought by the other
party hereto or its successors or assigns, shall be brought and
determined exclusively in the Delaware Court of Chancery (or a
proper Delaware state court if the Court of Chancery does not
have subject matter jurisdiction) or the federal courts sitting
in the State of Delaware. Each of the parties hereto consents to
the service of process or other papers in connection with such
action or proceeding in the manner provided in Section 8.8
or in such other manner as permitted by Law. Each of the parties
hereto hereby irrevocably submits with regard to any such action
or proceeding for itself and in respect of its property,
generally and unconditionally, to the personal jurisdiction of
the aforesaid courts and agrees that it will not bring any
action relating to this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated hereby in any court other than the aforesaid
courts. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives, to
the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, and agrees not
to assert, by way of motion, as a defense, counterclaim or
otherwise, in any action or proceeding with respect to this
Agreement, (a) any claim that it is not personally subject
to the jurisdiction of the above named courts for any reason
other than the failure to serve in accordance with this
Section 8.6, (b) any claim that it or its property is
exempt or immune from jurisdiction of any such court or from any
legal process commenced in such courts (whether through service
of notice, attachment prior to judgment, attachment in aid of
execution of judgment, execution of judgment or otherwise) and
(c) any claim that (i) the suit, action or proceeding
in such court is brought in an inconvenient forum, (ii) the
venue of such suit, action or proceeding is improper or
(iii) this Agreement, or the subject matter hereof, may not
be enforced in or by such courts.
Section 8.7 WAIVER
OF JURY TRIAL. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO
IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY
LEGAL PROCEEDING BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED
HEREBY.
Section 8.8 Notices. Any
notice required to be given hereunder shall be sufficient if in
writing, and sent by facsimile transmission (provided
that any notice received by facsimile transmission or otherwise
at the addressees location on any Business Day after
5:00 p.m. (addressees local time) shall be deemed to
have
D-26
been received at 9:00 a.m. (addressees local time) on
the next Business Day), by reliable overnight delivery service
(with proof of service), hand delivery or certified or
registered mail (return receipt requested and first-class
postage prepaid), addressed as follows:
To Parent or Merger Sub:
HH GP Holding, LLC
302 North Independence
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 242-4703
Attention: Harold Hamm
with copies to:
Baker Botts L.L.P.
910 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Facsimile:
(713) 229-1522
|
|
|
|
Attention:
|
Joshua Davidson
|
Paul Perea
To Holdings GP or Holdings:
Hiland Holdings GP, LP
205 West Maple
Suite 1100
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 616-2080
Attention: Joseph L. Griffin
with copies to:
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
2200 Ross Avenue
Suite 2800
Dallas, TX 75201
Facsimile:
(214) 855-8000
|
|
|
|
Attention:
|
Kenneth L. Stewart
|
Bryn A. Sappington
or to such other address as any party shall specify by written
notice so given, and such notice shall be deemed to have been
delivered as of the date so telecommunicated, personally
delivered or mailed. Any party to this Agreement may notify any
other party of any changes to the address or any of the other
details specified in this Section 8.8; provided,
however, that such notification shall only be effective
on the date specified in such notice or five (5) Business
Days after the notice is given, whichever is later. Rejection or
other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of
changed address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to
be receipt of the notice as of the date of such rejection,
refusal or inability to deliver.
Section 8.9 Assignment;
Binding Effect. Neither this Agreement nor
any of the rights, interests or obligations hereunder shall be
assigned by any of the parties hereto (whether by operation of
law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other
parties, except that, without written consent of any party
hereto, (i) Merger Sub may assign, in its sole discretion,
any of or all of its rights, interest and obligations under this
Agreement to Parent or to any direct or indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of Parent, (ii) Parent may assign any right to
receive a payment by Holdings of Expenses to any Affiliate of
Parent, and (iii) Merger Sub
and/or
Parent may assign its rights hereunder as collateral security to
any lender to Merger Sub
and/or
Parent or an Affiliate of Merger Sub
and/or
Parent, as the case may be, but, in each case, no such
assignment shall relieve Merger Sub
and/or
Parent, as applicable, of its obligations hereunder. Subject to
the preceding sentence, this
D-27
Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit
of the parties hereto and their respective successors and
assigns.
Section 8.10 Severability. Any
term or provision of this Agreement which is invalid or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that
jurisdiction, be ineffective only to the extent of such
invalidity or unenforceability without rendering invalid or
unenforceable such term or provision as to any other
jurisdiction or any of the remaining terms and provisions of
this Agreement in that or any other jurisdiction. If any
provision of this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable,
such provision shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is
enforceable.
Section 8.11 Entire
Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This
Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto)
constitutes the entire agreement, and supersedes all other prior
agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between
the parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter
hereof and thereof and, except as set forth in Section 5.9
and except for the rights of Unitholders whose Common Units
converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration
pursuant to Section 2.1 to receive such Merger
Consideration after the Effective Time, is not intended to and
shall not confer upon any person other than the parties hereto
any rights or remedies hereunder.
Section 8.12 Amendments;
Waivers. At any time prior to the Effective
Time, any provision of this Agreement may be amended or waived
if, and only if, such amendment or waiver is in writing and
signed, in the case of an amendment, by the Holdings Parties and
the Parent Parties, or in the case of a waiver, by the party
against whom the waiver is to be effective; provided,
however, that after receipt of Unitholder Approval, if
any such amendment or waiver shall by applicable Law or in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the NASDAQ Global
Select Market require further approval of the Unitholders of
Holdings, the effectiveness of such amendment or waiver shall be
subject to the approval of the Unitholders of Holdings.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no failure or delay by the
Holdings Parties or the Parent Parties in exercising any right
hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single
or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further
exercise of any other right hereunder.
Section 8.13 Headings;
Interpretation.
(a) Headings of the Articles and Sections of this Agreement
are for convenience of the parties only and shall be given no
substantive or interpretive effect whatsoever. The table of
contents to this Agreement is for reference purposes only and
shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement.
(b) When a reference is made in this Agreement to an
Article or Section, such reference shall be to an Article or
Section of this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. Whenever
the words include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words hereof,
herein and hereunder and words of
similar import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this
Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this
Agreement. The word or shall be deemed to mean
and/or. All terms defined in this Agreement shall
have the defined meanings when used in any certificate or other
document made or delivered pursuant thereto unless otherwise
defined therein. The definitions contained in this Agreement are
applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such
terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter
genders of such term. Any agreement, instrument or statute
defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or instrument
that is referred to herein means such agreement, instrument or
statute as from time to time amended, modified or supplemented,
including (in the case of agreements or instruments) by waiver
or consent and (in the case of statutes) by succession of
comparable successor statutes and references to all attachments
thereto and instruments incorporated therein. Each of the
parties has participated in the drafting and negotiation of this
Agreement. If an ambiguity or question of intent or
interpretation arises, this Agreement must be construed as if it
is drafted by all the parties, and no presumption or burden of
proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of
authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
References in this Agreement to specific laws or to specific
provisions of laws shall include all rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. Each party to this Agreement has or may
have set forth information in its respective disclosure schedule
in a section of such disclosure corresponding to the applicable
sections of this Agreement to which such disclosure applies. The
fact that any item of information is disclosed in a disclosure
schedule to this Agreement shall not
D-28
constitute an admission by such party that such item is
material, that such item has had or would have a Holdings
Material Adverse Effect or Parent Material Adverse Effect, as
applicable, or that the disclosure of such be construed to mean
that such information is required to be disclosed by this
Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, no provision of this
Agreement, including Sections 5.1, 5.4 or 5.6, shall
require the Holdings Parties to cause the board of directors of
Hiland GP (or any committee thereof) to recommend approval of
the Hiland Merger or the Hiland Agreement following a Hiland
Change in Board Recommendation or to prevent the board of
directors of Hiland GP (or any committee thereof) from
terminating the Hiland Agreement in accordance with its terms.
Section 8.14 No
Recourse. This Agreement may only be enforced
against, and any claims or causes of action that may be based
upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement, or the
negotiation, execution or performance of this Agreement may only
be made against the entities that are expressly identified as
parties hereto and no past, present or future Affiliate,
director, officer, employee, incorporator, member, manager,
partner, stockholder, agent, attorney or representative of any
party hereto shall have any liability for any obligations or
liabilities of the parties to this Agreement or for any claim
based on, in respect of, or by reason of, the transactions
contemplated hereby.
Section 8.15 Certain
Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement,
the following terms will have the following meanings when used
herein:
(a) Affiliates means, with respect to
any Person, any other Person that directly or indirectly through
one or more intermediaries controls, is controlled by or is
under common control with, the Person in question. As used
herein, the term control means the possession,
direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the
direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether
through ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.
(b) Budget means the annual budget of
each of Holdings and Hiland for fiscal year 2009 and included in
Section 8.15(b) of the Holdings Disclosure Schedule.
(c) Business Day means any day other
than a Saturday, Sunday or a day on which the banks in New York
are authorized by law or executive order to be closed.
(d) Common Unit has the meaning set
forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(e) Confidentiality Agreement means the
form of confidentiality agreement in Exhibit A to
this Agreement.
(f) Conflicts Committee means a
committee of the Board of Directors composed entirely of two or
more directors who are not (a) security holders, officers
or employees of Holdings GP, (b) officers, directors or
employees of any Affiliate of Holdings GP or (c) holders of
any ownership interest in the Holdings Group Entities other than
Common Units and who also meet the independence standards
required of directors who serve on an audit committee of a board
of directors established by the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations of the SEC thereunder and by the national securities
exchange on which the Common Units are listed.
(g) Contracts means any contracts,
agreements, licenses, notes, bonds, mortgages, indentures,
commitments, leases or other instruments or obligations, whether
written or oral.
(h) Employee Benefit Plan means all
compensation or employee benefit plans, programs, policies,
agreements or other arrangements, whether or not employee
benefit plans (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of
ERISA, whether or not subject to ERISA), whether written or
oral, including but not limited to, those that provide cash or
equity-based incentives, health, medical, dental, disability,
accident or life insurance benefits or vacation, severance,
retirement, pension or savings benefits, that are sponsored,
maintained or contributed to by the Holdings Group Entities, or
that the Holdings Group Entities have any obligation to sponsor,
maintain or contribute to, for the benefit of current or former
employees, directors, independent contractors or consultants of
the Holdings Group Entities and all employee, consultant and
independent contractor agreements providing compensation,
vacation, severance
D-29
or other benefits to any current or former officer, employee,
independent contractor or consultant of the Holdings Group
Entities, including Employment Agreements.
(i) Employment Agreement means all
agreements to which a Holdings Group Entity is a party that
relate to the employment or engagement, or arise from the past
employment or engagement, of any natural person by a Holdings
Group Entity, whether as an employee, nonemployee officer or
director, consultant or other independent contractor, sales
representative or distributor of any kind, including any
employee leasing or service agreement and any noncompetition
agreement.
(j) Encumbrances means pledges,
restrictions on transfer, proxies and voting or other
agreements, liens, claims, charges, mortgages, security
interests or other legal or equitable encumbrances, limitations
or restrictions of any nature whatsoever.
(k) General Partner Interest has the
meaning set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(l) Governmental Entity means any
(a) multinational, federal, national, provincial,
territorial, state, regional, municipal, local or other
government, governmental or public department, central bank,
court, tribunal, arbitral body, commission, administrative
agency, board, bureau or agency, domestic or foreign,
(b) subdivision, agent, commission, board, or authority of
any of the foregoing, or (c) quasi-governmental or private
body exercising any regulatory, expropriation or taxing
authority under, or for the account of, any of the foregoing, in
each case, which has jurisdiction or authority with respect to
the applicable party.
(m) Hamm Parties means Harold Hamm,
Continental Gas Holdings, Inc. and Bert Mackie, as trustee of
the Harold Hamm DST Trust and the Harold Hamm HJ Trust.
(n) Hiland Change in Board
Recommendation means a Change in Board Recommendation
as defined in the Hiland Agreement.
(o) Hiland Operating Credit Agreement
means the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2005,
among Hiland Operating, LLC, the lenders party thereto and
MidFirst Bank, as administrative agent, together with any
related guarantees, in each case as amended, restated,
supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time.
(p) Holdings Credit Agreement means the
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2006, among
Holdings, the lenders party thereto and MidFirst Bank, as
administrative agent, together with any related guarantees, in
each case as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise
modified from time to time.
(q) Holdings Material Adverse Effect
means any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or
occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate with all other
facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences,
has had or would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse
effect on the assets, liabilities, properties, business, results
of operations or condition (financial or otherwise) of the
Holdings Parties, taken as a whole, or on the ability of the
Holdings Parties to perform their obligations hereunder or to
consummate the Merger, but shall not include: (a) facts,
circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences
(i) generally affecting the midstream oil and gas or
gathering and processing industries (including commodity
prices), (ii) generally affecting the economy or the
financial or securities markets in the United States or globally
(including interest rates), (iii) generally affecting
regulatory or political conditions in the United States or
globally, (iv) caused by compliance with the terms of this
Agreement (including omissions required by this Agreement),
(v) caused by the announcement or pendency of the Merger
(including litigation brought by any Unitholders of Holdings (on
their own behalf or on behalf of Holdings) or loss of or adverse
changes in relationships with employees, customers or suppliers
of Holdings) or (vi) caused by any action taken or omitted
to be taken by an officer of a Holdings Party at the direction
of any of the Parent Parties or Mr. Hamm (other than
(A) in his capacity as part of, (B) in accordance with
authority delegated to him by, or (C) as otherwise
authorized by, the Board of Directors or any committee thereof);
(b) changes in applicable Laws or GAAP after the date
hereof; (c) a decrease in the market price of the Common
Units; (d) any failure by the Holdings Parties to meet any
internal or publicly disclosed projections, forecasts or
estimates of revenue or earnings; (e) a
D-30
Ratio Default; (f) any decrease in distributions in respect
of the Common Units; or (g) any decrease in distributions
in respect of the Common or Subordinated Units of Hiland
occurring prior to the Execution Date; except, in the case of
clauses (a)(i), (a)(ii) or (a)(iii) of this definition, for any
fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence that
affects the assets, liabilities, properties, business, results
of operations or condition (financial or otherwise) of the
Holdings Parties, taken as a whole, in a disproportionately
adverse manner, compared to other participants in the midstream
oil and gas or gathering and processing industries, and except
that clauses (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of this
definition shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination
that any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence
underlying such decrease, failure or default has resulted in, or
contributed to, a Holdings Material Adverse Effect.
(r) Knowledge or
knowledge means (i) with respect to
Parent, the knowledge of the individuals listed on
Section 8.15(r)(i) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule and
(ii) with respect to the Holdings Parties, the knowledge of
the individuals listed on Section 8.15(r)(ii) of the
Holdings Disclosure Schedule.
(s) Law or Laws means
all statutes, regulations, statutory rules, orders, judgments,
decrees and terms and conditions of any grant of approval,
permission, authority, permit or license of any court,
Governmental Entity, statutory body or self-regulatory authority
(including the NASDAQ Global Select Market).
(t) Limited Partner has the meaning set
forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(u) Orders or orders
means any orders, judgments, injunctions, awards, decrees or
writs handed down, adopted or imposed by, including any consent
decree, settlement agreement or similar written agreement with,
any Governmental Entity.
(v) organizational or governing
documents means, for a corporation, the certificate of
incorporation (or similarly-titled document of equivalent
effect) and bylaws; for a partnership, the certificate of
limited partnership (or similarly-titled document of equivalent
effect) and partnership agreement; for a limited liability
company, the certificate of formation (or similarly-titled
document of equivalent effect) and limited liability company
agreement; and for other business entities, certificates and
documents of equivalent effect.
(w) Outstanding has the meaning set
forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(x) Parent Material Adverse Effect means
any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence
that, individually or in the aggregate with all other facts,
circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences, prevents
or materially delays or materially impairs or would be
reasonably likely to prevent or materially delay or materially
impair the ability of Parent or Merger Sub to consummate the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby.
(y) Partially Owned Entity means, with
respect to a specified person, any other person that is not a
Subsidiary of such specified person but in which such specified
person, directly or indirectly, owns less than 100% of the
equity interests thereof (whether voting or non-voting and
including beneficial interests).
(z) Partnership Agreement means the
Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Holdings,
dated as of September 25, 2006, as amended from time to
time.
(aa) Partnership Interest has the
meaning set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
(bb) Permitted Encumbrances means
(i) carriers, warehousemens, mechanics,
materialmens, repairmens or other like liens imposed
by law arising in the ordinary course of business which are not
overdue for a period of more than 60 days or which are
being contested in good faith by appropriate proceeding,
(ii) pledges or deposits in connection with workers
compensation, unemployment insurance and other social security
legislation and deposits securing liability to insurance
carriers under insurance or self-insurance arrangements,
(iii) liens, security interests, charges or other
encumbrances imposed by law for Taxes not yet due or which are
being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings
(provided
D-31
that adequate reserves with respect thereto are maintained on
the books of such person or its subsidiaries, as the case may
be, in conformity with GAAP), (iv) deposits to secure the
performance of bids, trade contracts (other than for borrowed
money), leases, statutory obligations, surety and appeal bonds,
performance bonds and other obligations of a like nature
incurred in the ordinary course of business, (v) easements,
rights-of-way, restrictions and other similar encumbrances
incurred in the ordinary course of business which, in the
aggregate, do not materially interfere with the ordinary conduct
of the business by the relevant person and its subsidiaries,
(vi) liens, title defects, preferential rights or other
encumbrances created pursuant to construction, operating and
maintenance agreements, space lease agreements and other similar
agreements, in each case having ordinary and customary terms and
entered into in the ordinary course of business by the relevant
person and its subsidiaries, (vii) liens on the assets of
Hiland Operating, LLC and its Subsidiaries securing the
obligations of Hiland Operating, LLC under the Hiland Operating
Credit Agreement, (viii) liens on the assets of Holdings
and its Subsidiaries securing the obligations of Holdings under
the Holdings Credit Agreement and (ix) Encumbrances set
forth in the organizational or governing documents of any of the
Holdings Group Entities.
(cc) person or Person
means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, a limited
liability company, an association, a trust or any other entity,
group (as such term is used in Section 13 of the Exchange
Act) or organization, including a Governmental Entity, and any
permitted successors and assigns of such person.
(dd) Ratio Default means the failure, if
any, of Hiland Operating, LLC to be in compliance with
(i) the Interest Coverage Ratio required by
Section 6.17 of the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement or
(ii) the Leverage Ratio required by Section 6.18 of
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement. For purposes of this
definition, Interest Coverage Ratio and
Leverage Ratio have the meanings assigned to them in
the Hiland Operating Credit Agreement.
(ee) Release means any depositing,
spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, placing, burying, emitting,
discarding, abandoning, emptying, discharging, migrating,
injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping or disposing.
(ff) Rollover Commitment means the
acknowledgement or commitment made by a Person listed on
Section 8.15(ff) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule in a
commitment letter or other support agreement executed as of the
date hereof in connection herewith.
(gg) Subsidiaries of any person means
any corporation, partnership, association, trust or other form
of legal entity of which (i) more than 50% of the
outstanding voting securities are directly or indirectly owned
by such person, or (ii) such person or any Subsidiary of
such person is a general partner.
(hh) Tax or Taxes
means any taxes, assessments, fees and other governmental
charges imposed by any Governmental Entity, including income,
profits, gross receipts, net proceeds, alternative or add-on
minimum, ad valorem, value added, goods and services, turnover,
sales, use, property, personal property (tangible and
intangible), environmental, stamp, leasing, lease, user, excise,
duty, franchise, capital stock, transfer, registration, license,
withholding, social security (or similar), unemployment,
disability, payroll, employment, fuel, excess profits,
occupational, premium, windfall profit, severance, estimated, or
other charge of any kind whatsoever, including any interest,
penalty, or addition thereto, whether disputed or not.
(ii) Tax Return means any return,
declaration, report, election, designation, notice, claim for
refund, or information return or statement relating to Taxes,
including any schedule or attachment thereto, and including any
amendment thereof.
(jj) Trusts means the Harold Hamm DST
Trust and the Harold Hamm HJ Trust. Bert Harold Mackie is the
trustee of each Trust.
(kk) Unit means any class or series of
equity interest in Holdings (but excluding any options, rights,
warrants and appreciation rights relating to an equity interest
in Holdings) designated as a Unit, which shall
include Common Units.
D-32
(ll) Unitholder means the holder of a
Unit.
(mm) Unitholder Approval means
(i) approval of at least a majority of the Outstanding
Common Units voting together as a class and (ii) approval
of at least a majority of the Outstanding Common Units
(excluding Common Units owned by Mr. Hamm, his Affiliates
(including Continental Gas) and the Trusts) voting as a class.
(nn) Each of the following terms is defined in the Section
set forth opposite such term:
|
|
|
Agreement
|
|
Preamble
|
Alternative Proposal
|
|
Section 5.3(g)
|
Board of Directors
|
|
Recitals
|
Book-Entry Common Units
|
|
Section 2.2(a)
|
Cap Amount
|
|
Section 5.9(c)
|
Certificate of Merger
|
|
Section 1.3
|
Certificates
|
|
Section 2.2(a)
|
Change in Board Recommendation
|
|
Section 5.3(d)
|
Closing
|
|
Section 1.2
|
Closing Date
|
|
Section 1.2
|
Code
|
|
Section 2.2(b)(iii)
|
Continental Gas
|
|
Recitals
|
D&O Insurance
|
|
Section 5.9(b)
|
DLLCA
|
|
Section 1.1
|
DRULPA
|
|
Section 1.1
|
Effective Time
|
|
Section 1.3
|
Employees
|
|
Section 3.12
|
End Date
|
|
Section 7.1(b)(i)
|
ERISA
|
|
Section 3.7(a)
|
ERISA Affiliate
|
|
Section 3.7(a)
|
Exchange Act
|
|
Section 3.4(a)
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
Section 2.2(a)
|
Execution Date
|
|
Section 3.2(b)
|
Expenses
|
|
Section 7.2(a)
|
Funding
|
|
Section 4.4
|
Funding Commitments
|
|
Section 4.4
|
GAAP
|
|
Section 3.4(c)
|
Hiland
|
|
Recitals
|
Hiland Agreement
|
|
Recitals
|
Hiland GP
|
|
Recitals
|
Hiland Merger
|
|
Recitals
|
Hiland Parties
|
|
Recitals
|
HLND Merger Sub
|
|
Recitals
|
Holdings
|
|
Preamble
|
Holdings GP
|
|
Preamble
|
Holdings D&O Indemnified Parties
|
|
Section 5.9(b)
|
Holdings Disclosure Schedule
|
|
Article III
|
Holdings Financial Statements
|
|
Section 3.4(c)
|
Holdings GP LLC Agreement
|
|
Section 3.3(a)
|
D-33
|
|
|
Holdings Group Entities
|
|
Section 3.1(a)
|
Holdings LTIP
|
|
Section 2.1(b)(vi)
|
Holdings Parties
|
|
Preamble
|
Holdings SEC Documents
|
|
Section 3.4(a)
|
HSR Act
|
|
Section 5.6(b)
|
Letter of Transmittal
|
|
Section 2.2(b)(i)
|
Material Contracts
|
|
Section 3.16(a)
|
Merger
|
|
Recitals
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
Section 2.1(a)
|
Merger Sub
|
|
Preamble
|
Merger Sub LLC Interests
|
|
Section 1.6
|
Merger Sub LLC Units
|
|
Section 1.6
|
Parent
|
|
Preamble
|
Parent Disclosure Schedule
|
|
Article IV
|
Parent Parties
|
|
Preamble
|
Partnership Meeting
|
|
Section 5.4(b)
|
Paying Agent
|
|
Section 2.2(a)
|
Proxy Statement
|
|
Section 3.10
|
Recommendation
|
|
Section 3.15
|
Regulatory Law
|
|
Section 5.6(d)
|
Representatives
|
|
Section 5.3(a)
|
Rollover Interests
|
|
Section 2.1(b)
|
Rollover Parties
|
|
Section 2.1(b)
|
Schedule 13E-3
|
|
Section 3.10
|
SEC
|
|
Section 3.4(a)
|
Securities Act
|
|
Section 3.2(f)
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
Section 5.3(h)
|
Support Agreement
|
|
Recitals
|
Surviving Entity
|
|
Section 1.1
|
D-34
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed and delivered on the date first
above written.
HH GP HOLDING, LLC
Harold Hamm
President
HPGP MERGERCO, LLC
Harold Hamm
President
HILAND PARTNERS GP HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
L. Griffin
|
Joseph L. Griffin
Chief Executive Officer and President
HILAND HOLDINGS GP, LP
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC,
its General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
L. Griffin
|
Joseph L. Griffin
Chief Executive Officer and President
Signature
Page to Agreement and Plan of Merger
Annex E
SUPPORT
AGREEMENT
(HPGP Units)
This SUPPORT AGREEMENT, dated as of June 1, 2009 (this
Agreement), is entered into among Harold
Hamm, an individual residing in Oklahoma, Continental Gas
Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Continental
Gas), Bert Mackie, as trustee of the Harold Hamm DST
Trust and the Harold Hamm HJ Trust (each a
Trust and together the
Trusts), Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and the general partner of
Holdings (Holdings GP), and Hiland Holdings
GP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
(Holdings and, together with Holdings GP, the
Holdings Parties).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement, HH
GP Holding, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company
(Parent), HPGP MergerCo, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and a subsidiary of Parent
(Merger Sub and, together with Parent, the
Parent Parties), and the Holdings Parties
have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as it may be
amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time
(the Merger Agreement), which provides, among
other things, for the merger of Merger Sub with and into
Holdings, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
therein;
WHEREAS, Mr. Hamm and Continental Gas are the record and
Beneficial Owners of, and have the right to vote and dispose of,
that number of Units set forth next to their respective names on
Schedule A hereto;
WHEREAS, the Trusts are the record owners of that number of
Units set forth next to their respective names on
Schedule A, and Mr. Mackie in his capacity as
trustee of the Trusts is the Beneficial Owner of, and has the
right to vote and dispose of, such Units; and
WHEREAS, as an inducement to the Holdings Parties entering into
the Merger Agreement and incurring the obligations therein, the
Holdings Parties have required that Mr. Hamm, Continental
Gas and Mr. Mackie (collectively, the Hamm
Parties) enter into this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally
bound, agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
Certain
Definitions
Section 1.1 Defined
Terms. Terms used in this Agreement and not
defined herein have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
Merger Agreement.
Section 1.2 Other
Definitions. For the purposes of this
Agreement:
(a) Affiliates means, with respect
to any Person, any other Person that directly or indirectly
through one or more intermediaries controls, is controlled by or
is under common control with, the Person in question. As used
herein, the term control means the possession,
direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the
direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether
through ownership of voting securities, by contract or
otherwise. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the Hamm
Parties, on the one hand, and the Holdings Parties, the Hiland
Parties and their respective Subsidiaries, on the other hand,
shall be considered Affiliates for purposes of this Agreement.
(b) Beneficially Own or
Beneficial Ownership with respect to any
securities means having beneficial ownership of such
securities (as determined pursuant to
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act), including pursuant to any agreement,
arrangement or understanding, whether or not in writing. Without
duplicative counting of the same securities by the same holder,
securities Beneficially Owned by a Person include securities
Beneficially Owned by all Affiliates of such Person and all
other Persons with whom such Person would constitute a
group within the meaning of Section 13(d) of
the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder.
E-1
(c) Conflicts Committee means the
conflicts committee of the board of directors of Holdings GP.
(d) Expiration Time has the
meaning set forth in Section 2.1.
(e) Owned Units has the meaning
set forth in Section 2.1.
(f) Units has the meaning ascribed
thereto in the Merger Agreement, and will also include for
purposes of this Agreement all Partnership Interests into which
Units may be split, combined, merged, consolidated, reorganized,
reclassified, recapitalized or otherwise converted and any
rights and benefits arising therefrom, including any dividends
or distributions of Partnership Interests or other equity
securities which may be declared in respect of the Units and
entitled to vote in respect of the matters contemplated by
Article II.
ARTICLE II
Agreement to
Vote
Section 2.1 Agreement
to Vote. Subject to the terms and conditions
hereof, each of the Hamm Parties irrevocably and unconditionally
agrees that from and after the date hereof and until the
earliest to occur of (i) the Effective Time; (ii) the
termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its
terms; and (iii) the written agreement of the parties (with
respect to Holdings GP, acting through the Conflicts Committee)
to terminate this Agreement (such earliest occurrence being the
Expiration Time), at any meeting (including
each adjourned or postponed meeting) of Holdings
Unitholders, however called, or in any other circumstances
(including any sought action by written consent) upon which a
vote or other consent or approval is sought (any such meeting or
other circumstance, a Unitholders
Meeting), such Hamm Party will (A) appear at such
Unitholders Meeting or otherwise cause the Units
Beneficially Owned by such Hamm Party as of the relevant time
(Owned Units) to be counted as present
thereat for purposes of calculating a quorum and respond to any
other request by the Holdings Parties for written consent, if
any, and, (B) vote, or cause to be voted, all of its Owned
Units (1) in favor of the adoption and approval of the
Merger Agreement (whether or not recommended by Holdings
GPs Board of Directors or any committee thereof) and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger,
(2) in favor of the approval of any other matter to be
approved by the Unitholders of Holdings (including, without
limitation, the adjournment of a Unitholders Meeting) to
facilitate the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement, including the Merger, (3) against any
Alternative Proposal or any transaction contemplated by such
Alternative Proposal, (4) against any proposal made in
opposition to, or in competition or inconsistent with, the
Merger Agreement or the Merger, including the adoption thereof
or the consummation thereof, (5) against any extraordinary
dividend, distribution or recapitalization by Holdings or change
in the capital structure of Holdings (other than pursuant to or
as explicitly permitted by the Merger Agreement), and
(6) against any action or agreement that would reasonably
be expected to (a) result in a breach of any
representation, warranty or covenant of the Holdings Parties
under the Merger Agreement or (b) interfere with, delay or
attempt to discourage the Merger or the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
Section 2.2 Restrictions
on Unit Acquisitions. Until the Expiration
Time, each of the Hamm Parties agrees not to, and to cause their
respective Affiliates not to, (i) purchase any Common Units
or any other security of Holdings that is convertible into
Common Units in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions with third parties; (ii) form, join or in any
way participate in a group (within the meaning of
Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated
thereunder) in connection with any of the foregoing; or
(iii) commence a tender or exchange offer for Common Units
at a price below $2.40 per Common Unit; provided that
nothing herein shall restrict or be deemed to restrict any
actions by any of the Hamm Parties (whether as part of a group
or otherwise) that are consistent with or in furtherance of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including
changes to the membership of any such group in which
Mr. Hamm participates or the receipt by any of them of
Common Units in accordance with benefit plans in place prior to
the date hereof. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing contained
in this Section 2.2 shall be deemed to restrict in any
manner the purchase by any Hamm Party of Common Units or any
other security of Holdings that is convertible into Common Units
in a privately negotiated transaction with Holdings, which
transaction would be subject to the applicable provisions of the
Partnership Agreement and DRULPA.
E-2
Section 2.3 Proxy. The
Hamm Parties hereby revoke any and all previous proxies granted
with respect to the Owned Units. By entering into this
Agreement, the Hamm Parties hereby grant a proxy appointing the
proxyholders named in Holdings proxy card, with full power
of substitution (the Proxyholders), as the Hamm
Parties attorney-in-fact and proxy, for and in the Hamm
Parties names, to be counted as present and to vote or
otherwise to act on behalf of each Hamm Party with respect to
the Owned Units solely with respect to the matters set forth in,
and in accordance with Section 2.1. The proxy granted by
the Hamm Parties pursuant to this Section 2.3 is, subject
to the penultimate sentence of this Section 2.3,
irrevocable and is coupled with an interest and is granted in
order to secure the Hamm Parties performance under this
Agreement and also in consideration of Holdings and Holdings GP
entering into this Agreement and the Merger Agreement. The proxy
granted by the Hamm Parties shall be automatically revoked upon
termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms. The
Hamm Parties agree, from the date hereof until the Expiration
Time, not to attempt to revoke, frustrate the exercise of, or
challenge the validity of, the irrevocable proxy granted
pursuant to this Section 2.3.
ARTICLE III
Representations
and Warranties
Section 3.1 Representations
and Warranties of Hamm Parties. The Hamm
Parties severally represent and warrant to the Holdings Parties
as of the date of this Agreement and at all times during the
term of this Agreement, as follows:
(a) Such Hamm Party has all requisite corporate, limited
liability or other requisite power and authority to enter into
this Agreement, to carry out its obligations hereunder and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution,
delivery and performance by such Hamm Party of this Agreement
and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate, limited
liability company or other requisite action on the part of such
Hamm Party. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered
by such Hamm Party and, assuming the due authorization,
execution and delivery hereof by the other parties hereto,
constitutes a legal, valid and binding agreement of such Hamm
Party, enforceable against such Hamm Party in accordance with
its terms (except insofar as such enforceability may be limited
by bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization,
moratorium and similar laws relating to or affecting
creditors rights generally and by general principles of
equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered
in a proceeding in equity or at law)).
(b) Except for matters expressly contemplated by this
Agreement, neither the execution and delivery by such Hamm Party
of this Agreement, nor the consummation by such Hamm Party of
the transactions contemplated hereby and the performance by such
Hamm Party of this Agreement will (i) violate or conflict
with any provision of the organizational or governing documents
of such Hamm Party, if any; (ii) other than pursuant to
Sections 13(d) and 16 of the Exchange Act, require any
consent, approval, authorization or permit of, registration,
declaration or filing with, or notification to, any Governmental
Entity or any other person; (iii) result in any breach of
or constitute a default (or an event that, with notice or lapse
of time or both, would become a default) under, or give to
others any right of termination, cancellation, amendment or
acceleration of any obligation or the loss of any benefit under
any agreement or instrument to which such Hamm Party is a party
or by or to which any of their properties are bound;
(iv) result in the creation of an Encumbrance upon any of
the assets of such Hamm Party; or (v) violate or conflict
with any Law applicable to such Hamm Party.
(c) Such Hamm Party is the record and Beneficial Owner of
the number of Common Units of Holdings constituting Owned Units
as of the date hereof as set forth next to its respective name
on Schedule A of this Agreement. Such Hamm Party
owns its respective Owned Units free and clear of any
Encumbrances, except pursuant to the organizational or governing
documents of such Hamm Party, if any, or the Holdings Parties
and has the full legal right, power and authority to vote all of
the Owned Units without the consent or approval of, or any other
action on the part of any other Person, and has not
E-3
granted any proxy inconsistent with this Agreement that is still
effective or entered into any voting or similar agreement with
respect to, the Owned Units, in each case, except as provided in
this Agreement.
(d) The Owned Units set forth next to such Hamm
Partys name on Schedule A hereto constitute
all of the Partnership Interests of Holdings that are
Beneficially Owned by such Hamm Party as of the date hereof,
and, except for such Owned Units and except pursuant to the
organizational or governing documents of such Hamm Party, if
any, or the Holdings Parties such Hamm Party does not
Beneficially Own or have any right to acquire (whether
currently, upon lapse of time, following the satisfaction of any
conditions, upon the occurrence of any event or any combination
of the foregoing) any Units.
(e) Except for the representations and warranties contained
in this Section 3.1 and except as otherwise expressly set
forth in this Agreement or in the agreements or certificates
entered into in connection herewith or contemplated hereby
(including, without limitation, the Merger Agreement), none of
the Hamm Parties nor any other Person on behalf of the Hamm
Parties makes any other representation or warranty of any kind
or nature, express or implied, in connection with this Agreement
or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 3.2 Representations
and Warranties of the Holdings Parties. The
Holdings Parties, jointly and severally, represent and warrant
to each of the Hamm Parties as of the date of this Agreement and
at all times during the term of this Agreement, as follows:
(a) Each of the Holdings Parties has all requisite limited
liability company power and authority to enter into this
Agreement, to carry out its obligations hereunder and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution,
delivery and performance by each Holdings Party of this
Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby have been duly authorized by all requisite limited
liability company action on the part of such Holdings Party.
This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by each
Holdings Party and, assuming the due authorization, execution
and delivery hereof by the other parties hereto, constitutes a
legal, valid and binding agreement of such Holdings Party,
enforceable against such Holdings Party in accordance with its
terms (except insofar as such enforceability may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization,
moratorium and similar laws relating to or affecting
creditors rights generally and by general principles of
equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered
in a proceeding in equity or at law)).
(b) Except for matters expressly contemplated by this
Agreement, neither the execution and delivery by the Holdings
Parties of this Agreement, nor the consummation by the Holdings
Parties of the transactions contemplated hereby and the
performance by the Holdings Parties of this Agreement will
(i) violate or conflict with any provision of the
organizational or governing documents of the Holdings Parties;
(ii) require any consent, approval, authorization or permit
of, registration, declaration or filing with, or notification
to, any Governmental Entity or any other person;
(iii) result in any breach of or constitute a default (or
an event that, with notice or lapse of time or both, would
become a default) under, or give to others any right of
termination, cancellation, amendment or acceleration of any
obligation or the loss of any benefit under any agreement or
instrument to which any of the Holdings Parties is a party or by
or to which any of their properties are bound; (iv) result
in the creation of an Encumbrance upon any of the assets of any
of the Holdings Parties; or (v) violate or conflict with
any Law applicable to the Holdings Parties.
(c) Except for the representations and warranties contained
in this Section 3.2 and except as otherwise expressly set
forth in this Agreement or in the agreements or certificates
entered into in connection herewith or contemplated hereby
(including, without limitation, the Merger Agreement), none of
the Holdings Parties nor any other Person on behalf of the
Holdings Parties makes any other representation or warranty of
any kind or nature, express or implied, in connection with this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
E-4
ARTICLE IV
Additional
Covenants of Hamm Parties
Section 4.1 Rollover
of Partnership Interests. Each of the Hamm
Parties agrees and acknowledges that in the Merger, the Common
Units of which such Hamm Party is the record owner (in the case
of the Trusts), is the Beneficial Owner (in the case of
Mr. Mackie) or is the record and Beneficial Owner (in the
case of Mr. Hamm and Continental Gas) will remain
outstanding as Common Units of the Surviving Entity and will not
be converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration
or entitled to any other form of consideration.
Section 4.2 Non-Interference;
Further Assurances. Each of the Hamm Parties
agrees that, prior to the termination of this Agreement, such
Hamm Party shall not take any action that would make any
representation or warranty of such Hamm Party contained herein
untrue or incorrect or have the effect of preventing, impeding,
interfering with or adversely affecting the performance by such
Hamm Party of its obligations under this Agreement;
provided, however, that this restriction shall not
in any way restrict or limit the Parent Parties right to
terminate the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms or
obligate the Parent Parties to waive any conditions set forth in
the Merger Agreement. Each of the Hamm Parties agrees, without
further consideration, to execute and deliver such additional
documents and to take such further actions as are necessary or
reasonably requested by the Holdings Parties to confirm and
assure the rights and obligations set forth in this Agreement or
to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE V
Termination
Section 5.1 Termination. This
Agreement shall terminate without further action at the
Expiration Time.
Section 5.2 Effect
of Termination. Upon termination of this
Agreement, the rights and obligations of all the parties will
terminate and become void without further action by any party
except for the provisions of Section 5.1, this
Section 5.2 and Article VI, which will survive such
termination. For the avoidance of doubt, the termination of this
Agreement shall not relieve any party of liability for any
willful breach of this Agreement prior to the time of
termination, in which case the aggrieved party shall be entitled
to all rights and remedies available at law or in equity.
ARTICLE VI
General
Section 6.1 Survival
of Representations and Warranties. None of
the representations and warranties in this Agreement shall
survive the Expiration Time.
Section 6.2 Expenses. All
costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement
and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the
party incurring or required to incur such expenses.
Section 6.3 Counterparts;
Effectiveness. This Agreement may be executed
in two or more counterparts (including by facsimile), each of
which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the
signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument, and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been
signed by each of the parties and delivered (by telecopy or
otherwise) to the other parties.
Section 6.4 Governing
Law. This Agreement, and all claims or causes
of action (whether at law or in equity, in contract or in tort)
that may be based upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement
or the negotiation, execution or performance hereof, shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice or
conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of
Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the
application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State
of Delaware. Each of the parties hereto agrees (a) that
this Agreement involves at least
E-5
$100,000.00, and (b) that this Agreement has been entered
into by the parties hereto in express reliance upon 6 Del.
C. § 2708.
Section 6.5 Specific
Performance; Jurisdiction; Enforcement. The
parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event
that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed
in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise
breached. It is accordingly agreed that prior to the termination
of this Agreement in accordance with Article V the parties
shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent
breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms
and provisions of this Agreement exclusively in the Delaware
Court of Chancery (or a proper Delaware state court if the Court
of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction) or the
federal courts sitting in the State of Delaware, this being in
addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law
or in equity. In connection with any request for specific
performance or equitable relief by any party hereto, each of the
other parties waive any requirement for the security or posting
of any bond in connection with such remedy. In addition, each of
the parties hereto irrevocably agrees that any Legal Action or
proceeding with respect to this Agreement and the rights and
obligations arising hereunder, or for recognition and
enforcement of any judgment in respect of this Agreement and the
rights and obligations arising hereunder brought by the other
party hereto or its successors or assigns, shall be brought and
determined exclusively in the Delaware Court of Chancery (or a
proper Delaware state court if the Court of Chancery does not
have subject matter jurisdiction) or the federal courts sitting
in the State of Delaware. Each of the parties hereto consents to
the service of process or other papers in connection with such
action or proceeding in the manner provided in Section 6.7
or in such other manner as permitted by Law and, to the extent
such party is not otherwise subject to service of process in the
State of Delaware, to appoint and maintain an agent in the State
of Delaware as such partys agent for acceptance of legal
process and notify the other party or parties hereto of the name
and address of such agent, and that service of process may, to
the fullest extent permitted by law, also be made on such party
by prepaid certified mail with a proof of mailing receipt
validated by the United States Postal Service constituting
evidence of valid service, and that service made pursuant to the
above shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, have the
same legal force and effect as if served upon such party
personally within the State of Delaware. Each of the parties
hereto hereby irrevocably submits with regard to any such action
or proceeding for itself and in respect of its property,
generally and unconditionally, to the personal jurisdiction of
the aforesaid courts and agrees that it will not bring any
action relating to this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated hereby in any court other than the aforesaid
courts. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives, to
the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, and agrees not
to assert, by way of motion, as a defense, counterclaim or
otherwise, in any action or proceeding with respect to this
Agreement, (a) any claim that it is not personally subject
to the jurisdiction of the above named courts for any reason
other than the failure to serve in accordance with this
Section 6.5, (b) any claim that it or its property is
exempt or immune from jurisdiction of any such court or from any
legal process commenced in such courts (whether through service
of notice, attachment prior to judgment, attachment in aid of
execution of judgment, execution of judgment or otherwise) and
(c) any claim that (i) the suit, action or proceeding
in such court is brought in an inconvenient forum, (ii) the
venue of such suit, action or proceeding is improper or
(iii) this Agreement, or the subject matter hereof, may not
be enforced in or by such courts. For purposes of implementing
the parties agreement to appoint and maintain an agent for
service of process in the State of Delaware, each such party
that has not as of the date hereof already duly appointed such
an agent does hereby appoint The Corporation Trust Company,
Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington,
Delaware 19801, as such agent.
Section 6.6 WAIVER
OF JURY TRIAL. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO
IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY
LEGAL PROCEEDING BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED
HEREBY.
Section 6.7 Notices. Any
notice required to be given hereunder shall be sufficient if in
writing, and sent by facsimile transmission (provided that any
notice received by facsimile transmission or otherwise at the
addressees location on any Business Day after
5:00 p.m. (addressees local time) shall be deemed to
have been received at 9:00 a.m. (addressees local
time) on the next Business Day), by reliable overnight delivery
E-6
service (with proof of service), hand delivery or certified or
registered mail (return receipt requested and first-class
postage prepaid), addressed as follows:
To Harold Hamm and Continental Gas:
Harold Hamm
302 North Independence
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 242-4703
Continental Gas Holdings, Inc.
302 North Independence
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 242-4703
Attention: Harold Hamm
with copies to:
Baker Botts L.L.P.
910 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Facsimile:
(713) 229-1522
|
|
|
|
Attention:
|
Joshua Davidson
|
Paul Perea
To Bert Mackie,
as Trustee of the Harold Hamm DST Trust and the Harold Hamm HJ
Trust:
Bert Mackie
201 West Broadway
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 242-4703
To the Holdings Parties:
Hiland Holdings GP, LP
205 West Maple
Suite 1100
Enid, OK 73701
Facsimile:
(580) 616-2080
Attention: Joseph L. Griffin
with copies to:
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
2200 Ross Avenue
Suite 2800
Dallas, TX 75201
Facsimile:
(214) 855-8000
|
|
|
|
Attention:
|
Kenneth L. Stewart
|
Bryn A. Sappington
or to such other address as any party shall specify by written
notice so given, and such notice shall be deemed to have been
delivered as of the date so telecommunicated, personally
delivered or mailed. Any party to this Agreement may notify any
other party of any changes to the address or any of the other
details specified in this paragraph; provided,
however, that such notification shall only be effective
on the date specified in such notice or five (5) Business
Days after the notice is given, whichever is later. Rejection or
other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of
changed address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to
be receipt of the notice as of the date of such rejection,
refusal or inability to deliver.
E-7
Section 6.8 Assignment. Neither
this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations
hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties hereto
(whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior
written consent of the other parties. Subject to the preceding
sentence, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns.
Section 6.9 Severability. Any
term or provision of this Agreement which is invalid or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that
jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or
unenforceability without rendering invalid or unenforceable the
remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement in any other
jurisdiction. If any provision of this Agreement is so broad as
to be unenforceable, such provision shall be interpreted to be
only so broad as is enforceable.
Section 6.10 Entire
Agreement; No Third Party Beneficiaries. This
Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto)
constitutes the entire agreement, and supersedes all other prior
agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between
the parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter
hereof and is not intended to and shall not confer upon any
person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies
hereunder.
Section 6.11 Amendments. This
Agreement may not be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified
except by the express written agreement signed by all of the
parties (with respect to Holdings GP, acting through the
Conflicts Committee) to this Agreement.
Section 6.12 Extension;
Waiver. At any time prior to the Expiration
Time, the Holdings Parties (with respect to Holdings GP, acting
through the Conflicts Committee), on the one hand, and the Hamm
Parties, on the other hand, may (i) extend the time for the
performance of any of the obligations of the other party,
(ii) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and
warranties of the other party contained in this Agreement or in
any document delivered under this Agreement or (iii) waive
compliance with any of the covenants or conditions of the other
party contained in this Agreement. Any agreement on the part of
a party to any extension or waiver will be valid only if set
forth in an instrument in writing signed by such party. The
failure of any party to assert any of its rights under this
Agreement or otherwise will not constitute a waiver of such
rights.
Section 6.13 Headings. Headings
of the Articles and Sections of this Agreement are for
convenience of the parties only and shall be given no
substantive or interpretive effect whatsoever. The table of
contents to this Agreement is for reference purposes only and
shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement.
Section 6.14 Interpretation. When
a reference is made in this Agreement to an Article or Section,
such reference shall be to an Article or Section of this
Agreement unless otherwise indicated. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words hereof,
herein and hereunder and words of
similar import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this
Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this
Agreement. The word or shall be deemed to mean
and/or. All terms defined in this Agreement shall
have the defined meanings when used in any certificate or other
document made or delivered pursuant thereto unless otherwise
defined therein. The definitions contained in this Agreement are
applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such
terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter
genders of such term. Any agreement, instrument or statute
defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or instrument
that is referred to herein means such agreement, instrument or
statute as from time to time amended, modified or supplemented,
including (in the case of agreements or instruments) by waiver
or consent and (in the case of statutes) by succession of
comparable successor statutes and references to all attachments
thereto and instruments incorporated therein. Each of the
parties has participated in the drafting and negotiation of this
Agreement. If an ambiguity or question of intent or
interpretation arises, this Agreement must be construed as if it
is drafted by all the parties, and no presumption or burden of
proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of
authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement. Any
statute defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or
instrument referred to herein shall mean such statute as from
time to time amended, modified or supplemented, including by
succession of comparable successor statutes.
E-8
Section 6.15 No
Recourse. This Agreement may only be enforced
against, and any claims or causes of action that may be based
upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement, or the
negotiation, execution or performance of this Agreement may only
be made against the entities that are expressly identified as
parties hereto and no past, present or future Affiliate,
director, officer, employee, incorporator, member, manager,
partner, stockholder, agent, attorney or representative of any
party hereto shall have any liability for any obligations or
liabilities of the parties to this Agreement or for any claim
based on, in respect of, or by reason of, the transactions
contemplated hereby.
Section 6.16 Action
in Unitholder Capacity Only. The parties
acknowledge that this Agreement is entered into by each of the
Hamm Parties solely in their respective capacities as the record
or Beneficial Owners of the Owned Units.
E-9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has caused this Agreement
to be signed as of the date first above written.
HILAND PARTNERS GP HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
L. Griffin
|
Joseph L. Griffin
Chief Executive Officer and President
HILAND HOLDINGS GP, LP
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC,
|
its General Partner
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
L. Griffin
|
Joseph L. Griffin
Chief Executive Officer and President
HAROLD HAMM
CONTINENTAL GAS HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Matthew
S. Harrison
|
Matthew S. Harrison
Vice President - Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
BERT MACKIE,
as Trustee of the Harold Hamm DST Trust
BERT MACKIE,
as Trustee of the Harold Hamm HJ Trust
Signature Page to Support
Agreement (HPGP Units)
Schedule A
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP OF HOLDINGS COMMON UNITS
|
|
|
|
|
Harold Hamm
|
|
|
|
|
Sole Voting and Dispositive Power
|
|
|
59,600
|
|
Shared Voting and Dispositive Power
|
|
|
8,481,350
|
|
Continental Gas Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Shared Voting and Dispositive Power
|
|
|
8,481,350
|
|
Bert Mackie
|
|
|
|
|
Sole Voting and Dispositive Power
|
|
|
4,597,102
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consisting of 2,757,390 Common Units and 1,839,712 Common Units
held of record by the Harold Hamm DST Trust and the Harold Hamm
HJ Trust, respectively. |
Annex F
|
|
|
|
|
745 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
United States
|
June 1,
2009
Conflicts Committee of the Board of Directors
Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC
205 West Maple, Suite 1100
Enid, Oklahoma 73701
Conflicts
Committee of the Board of Directors:
We understand that Hiland Holdings GP, LP, a Delaware limited
partnership (Holdings), and Hiland Partners
GP Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the
general partner of Holdings (Holdings GP, and
together with Holdings, the Holdings
Parties), intend to enter into a transaction (the
Proposed Transaction) with HH GP Holding,
LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company
(Parent), and HPGP MergerCo, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Parent (HPGP Merger Sub, and together with
Parent, the Parent Parties), pursuant to
which (i) HPGP Merger Sub will be merged with and into
Holdings, with Holdings continuing as the surviving entity (the
Merger), and (ii) upon effectiveness of
the Merger, each issued and outstanding common unit of Holdings
(the Holdings Common Units), other than the
interests owned by the Hamm Parties (as defined below), as set
forth in the Agreement, will be converted into the right to
receive $2.40 per Holdings Common Unit in cash. The terms and
conditions of the Proposed Transaction are set forth in more
detail in the Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Parent,
HPGP Merger Sub, Holdings GP and Holdings (the
Agreement). We also understand that certain
unitholders of Holdings, including Harold Hamm, Continental Gas
Holdings, Inc. (Continental Holdings), and
Bert Mackie, as trustee of the Harold Hamm DST Trust and the
Harold Hamm HJ Trust (collectively, the parties to the Support
Agreement (as defined below), the Hamm
Parties), have agreed to vote all Holdings Common
Units beneficially owned or controlled by the Hamm Parties and
their affiliates in favor of the Proposed Transaction, as
reflected in the Support Agreement (the Support
Agreement). In addition, we understand that in
connection with the Proposed Transaction, HLND Merger Co, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Parent (the HLND Merger Sub), will be
merged with and into Hiland Partners, LP, a Delaware limited
partnership (Hiland), on the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the Hiland Agreement) among the
Parent, HLND Merger Sub, Hiland Partners GP, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and the general partner of Hiland
(Hiland GP), and Hiland (such proposed
merger, the Hiland Merger), and that upon the
effectiveness of the Hiland Merger, each common unit of Hiland,
other than those owned by Holdings, will be converted into the
right to receive an amount of cash, as provided in Hiland
Agreement. In addition, we further understand that the Parent
Parties and the Holdings Parties respective
obligations to consummate the Proposed Transaction are
contingent (except in limited circumstances) upon the concurrent
consummation of the Hiland Merger on the terms set forth in the
Hiland Agreement.
We have been requested by the Conflicts Committee (the
Conflicts Committee) of the Board of
Directors of Holdings GP (the Board) to
render our opinion with respect to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Holdings unitholders (other
than the Hamm Parties) of the consideration to be offered to
such unitholders in the Proposed Transaction. We have not been
requested to opine as to, and our opinion does not in any manner
address, Holdings GPs or Holdings underlying
business decision (i) to proceed with or effect the
Proposed Transaction or (ii) with respect to the timing of
entering into or consummating the Proposed Transaction. Further,
we have not been requested to opine as to, and our opinion does
not in any manner address, the proposed Hiland Merger among the
Parent, HLND Merger Sub, Hiland GP and Hiland, nor are we
representing any of those entities or the Hamm Parties. In
addition, we express no opinion on, and
F-1
our opinion does not in any manner address, the fairness of the
amount or the nature of any compensation to any officers,
directors or employees of any parties to the Proposed
Transaction, or any class of such persons, relative to the
consideration to be offered to the unitholders of Holdings in
the Proposed Transaction.
We understand, based on discussions with the management of
Holdings and Hiland, that Holdings derives all of its cash flows
from its ownership of (i) limited partner units in Hiland
(both common and subordinated), (ii) the general partner
interest in Hiland, and (iii) the associated incentive
distribution rights, and as such, our analysis involved, in
part, a review of Hilands financial and operating
information provided by the management of Hiland. In arriving at
our opinion, we reviewed and analyzed: (1) a draft of the
Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2009, and the specific terms
of the Proposed Transaction, (2) publicly available
information concerning Holdings and Hiland that we believe to be
relevant to our analysis, including Holdings and
Hilands Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and Quarterly
Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009,
(3) financial and operating information with respect to the
business, operations and prospects of Hiland, furnished to us by
Hiland management, including financial projections prepared by
Hiland management (the Hiland Projections),
(4) financial and operating information with respect to the
business, operations and prospects of Holdings, furnished to us
by the management of Holdings and Hiland, including financial
projections prepared by the management of Holdings and Hiland
(the Holdings Projections), (5) the
trading histories of Holdings Common Units and the common units
of Hiland from May 28, 2008 to May 28, 2009 and a
comparison of those trading histories with those of other
companies and publicly traded partnerships that we deemed
relevant, (6) a comparison of the historical financial
results and present financial condition of Holdings and Hiland
with those of other companies and publicly traded partnerships
that we deemed relevant, (7) a comparison of the financial
terms of the Proposed Transaction with the financial terms of
certain other transactions that we deemed relevant, (8) the
impact of varying commodity price and volume scenarios on
Hilands operating and financial prospects, including
(i) assumptions used by Hilands management, with
commodity prices as quoted on the NYMEX on May 28, 2009 and
(ii) selected commodity price and volume sensitivity cases,
in both cases analyzing the resultant impact on Holdings and
Hiland, (9) Hilands current liquidity position and
its ability to meet its cash requirements, financial obligations
and covenants contained in its revolving credit facility,
(10) the limited business and strategic alternatives
available to Holdings and Hiland, taking into consideration the
challenging conditions for natural gas gathering and processing
companies, (11) the limited financing or re-financing
alternatives available to Holdings and Hiland, the result of
which may lead to the insolvency of Holdings
and/or
Hiland, (12) the impact of Hilands recent decision to
suspend indefinitely its quarterly cash distributions, thereby
reducing Holdings cash inflows to zero and resulting in
arrearages which require Hiland to first pay cumulative
arrearage amounts to its common unit holders (including
Holdings) before any cash distributions may be paid to Holdings
with regard to its subordinated units, and (13) the impact
of Holdings recent decision to suspend indefinitely its
quarterly cash distributions. We have had discussions with the
management of Holdings and Hiland concerning their respective
business, operations, assets, liabilities, financial condition
and prospects and have undertaken such other studies, analyses
and investigations as we deemed appropriate.
In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information
used by us without any independent verification of such
information and have further relied upon the assurances of the
management of Holdings and Hiland that they are not aware of any
facts or circumstances that would make such information
inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the Hiland
Projections, upon the advice of Hiland, we have assumed that
such projections have been reasonably prepared on a basis
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the management of Hiland as to the future financial
performance of Hiland and that Hiland will perform substantially
in accordance with such projections. With respect to the
Holdings Projections, upon advice of the management of Hiland
and Holdings we have assumed that such projections have been
reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the management of Hiland
and Holdings as to the future financial performance of Holdings
and that Holdings will perform substantially in accordance with
such projections. We assume no responsibility for and we express
no view as to the accuracy of any such projections or estimates
or the assumptions on which they are based. In arriving at our
opinion, we have not conducted a physical inspection of the
properties and facilities of either Hiland or Holdings and have
not made or obtained any
F-2
evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities of
Hiland, Holdings or any of their subsidiaries. In addition, you
have not authorized us to solicit, and we have not solicited,
any indications of interest from any third party with respect to
the purchase of all or a part of Hilands business or
Holdings equity interests in Hiland. Our opinion
necessarily is based upon market, economic and other conditions
as they exist on, and can be evaluated as of, the date of this
letter. We assume no responsibility for updating or revising our
opinion based on events or circumstances that may occur after
the date of this letter.
We have assumed that the executed Agreement will conform in all
material respects to the last draft reviewed by us. In addition,
we have assumed the accuracy of the representations and
warranties contained in the Agreement and all agreements related
thereto. We have also assumed, upon the advice of Holdings, that
all material governmental, regulatory and third party approvals,
consents and releases for the Proposed Transaction will be
obtained within the constraints contemplated by the Agreement
and that the Proposed Transaction will be consummated in
accordance with the terms of the Agreement without waiver,
modification or amendment of any material term, condition or
agreement thereof. We do not express any opinion as to any tax
or other consequences that might result from the Proposed
Transaction, nor does our opinion address any legal, tax,
regulatory or accounting matters, as to which we understand that
Holdings has obtained such advice as it deemed necessary from
qualified professionals.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
as of the date hereof that, from a financial point of view, the
cash consideration to be offered to the unitholders of Holdings
(other than the Hamm Parties) in the Proposed Transaction is
fair to such unitholders.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Conflicts Committee of
the Board in connection with the Proposed Transaction. We have
received a retainer fee for our services and will receive an
additional fee for our services which is payable upon rendering
this opinion. In addition, in the sole and absolute discretion
of the Conflicts Committee of the Board, we may be paid a
limited discretionary fee based on the Conflict Committees
evaluation of the quality and quantity of work we have
performed. Holdings has also agreed to reimburse certain of our
expenses and indemnify us for certain liabilities that may arise
out of our engagement. We have performed various investment
banking and financial services for Hiland, Holdings, their
affiliates and the Parent in the past, and may expect to perform
such services in the future, and have received, and expect to
receive, customary fees for such services. However, in the past
two years, we have performed only limited services for Hiland,
Holdings and their affiliates, for which we received no
compensation. Barclays Capital Inc. is a full service securities
firm engaged in a wide range of businesses from investment and
commercial banking, lending, asset management and other
financial and non-financial services. In the ordinary course of
our business, we and our affiliates may actively trade and
effect transactions in the equity, debt
and/or other
securities (and any derivatives thereof) and financial
instruments (including loans and other obligations) of Hiland,
Holdings, and their affiliates for our own account and for the
accounts of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold
long or short positions and investments in such securities and
financial instruments.
This opinion, the issuance of which has been approved by our
Fairness Opinion Committee, is for the use and benefit of the
Conflicts Committee of the Board and is rendered to the
Conflicts Committee of the Board in connection with its
consideration of the Proposed Transaction. In connection with
the Conflicts Committees recommendation to the Board
regarding the Proposed Transaction, we hereby authorize the
Conflicts Committee to provide a copy of this opinion to the
members of the Board for the use and benefit of the Board in
connection with the Boards consideration of the Proposed
Transaction in light of their fiduciary duties to the
unitholders of Holdings. This opinion is not intended to be and
does not constitute a recommendation to any unitholder of
Holdings as to how such unitholder should vote with respect to
the Proposed Transaction or whether to accept the consideration
to be offered to the unitholders (other than the Hamm Parties)
in connection with the Proposed Transaction.
Very truly yours,
BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC.
F-3
HILAND PARTNERS, LP
SPECIAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS
, 2009
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HILAND PARTNERS GP, LLC
The undersigned holder of common units of Hiland Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership,
hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Special Meeting of Unitholders and Joint Proxy
Statement, each dated , 2009, and revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints [ ] and
[ ] (together, the Proxies), each with the full power
and authority to act as proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote all of
the common units which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the special meeting of
unitholders of Hiland Partners, LP to be held at , at on , ,
2009, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, on the matters set forth
in this form of proxy and described in the Joint Proxy Statement, and in their discretion with
respect to such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournments or
postponement thereof, in accordance with the following instructions:
1. |
|
To approve (a) the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 1, 2009, among Hiland
Partners, LP, Hiland Partners GP, LLC, HH GP Holding, LLC and HLND MergerCo, LLC, as the
same may be amended from time to time, which agreement provides, among other things, that
HLND MergerCo, LLC will merge with and into Hiland Partners, LP, with Hiland Partners, LP
continuing as the surviving entity (the Hiland Partners merger) and (b) the Hiland
Partners merger. |
o FOR o AGAINST o ABSTAIN
2. |
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the special meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof. |
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned
unitholder. Proxy cards properly executed and returned without direction will be voted FOR each
proposal listed above. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other
business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment thereof.
Signature must be that of the unitholder himself or herself. If common units are held jointly, each
unitholder named should sign. If the signer is a corporation, please sign the full corporate name
by duly authorized officer. If the signer is a partnership, please sign partnership name by
authorized person. Executors, administrators, trustees, guardians, attorneys-in-fact, etc., should
so indicate when signing.
|
|
|
Dated: , 2009
|
|
IMPORTANT: Please insert date. |
|
|
|
INDIVIDUAL HOLDER:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
SignaturePlease write legibly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print Name Here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature (if held jointly) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print Name Here |
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE OR PARTNERSHIP HOLDER: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Name |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
Its: |
|
|