e424b3
This
preliminary prospectus supplement relates to an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, but it is not complete and may be changed. This
preliminary prospectus supplement is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424b3
Registration No. 333-158781
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
OCTOBER 27, 2009
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT TO PROSPECTUS, DATED APRIL 24, 2009
$579,273,000
2009-2
PASS THROUGH TRUSTS
PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES,
SERIES 2009-2
Two classes of the Continental Airlines Pass Through
Certificates,
Series 2009-2,
are being offered under this prospectus supplement: Class A
and B. A separate trust will be established for each class of
certificates. The proceeds from the sale of certificates will
initially be held in escrow, and interest on the escrowed funds
will be payable semiannually on May 10 and November 10,
commencing May 10, 2010. The trusts will use the escrowed
funds to acquire equipment notes. The equipment notes will be
issued by Continental Airlines and will be secured by eight
Boeing aircraft currently owned by Continental and nine new
Boeing aircraft scheduled for delivery from January to June
2010. Payments on the equipment notes held in each trust will be
passed through to the holders of certificates of such
trust.
Interest on the equipment notes will be payable
semiannually on each May 10 and November 10 after issuance.
Principal payments on the equipment notes are scheduled on May
10 and November 10 in certain years, beginning on
November 10, 2010.
The Class A certificates will rank senior to the
Class B certificates.
Natixis S.A., acting through its New York Branch, will
provide a liquidity facility for the Class A and B
certificates, in each case in an amount sufficient to make three
semiannual interest payments.
The certificates will not be listed on any national
securities exchange.
Investing in the certificates involves risks. See
Risk Factors on
page S-17.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass Through
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Final Expected
|
|
Price to
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Distribution Date
|
|
Public(1)
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
$474,273,000
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
$105,000,000
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(1) |
Plus accrued interest, if any, from the date of issuance.
|
The underwriters will purchase all of the certificates if any
are purchased. The aggregate proceeds from the sale of the
certificates will be $579,273,000. Continental will pay the
underwriters a commission of $ .
Delivery of the certificates in book-entry form only will be
made on or
about ,
2009.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Joint Structuring Agents & Joint Bookrunners
|
|
|
MORGAN
STANLEY |
GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO. |
CREDIT SUISSE |
The date of this prospectus supplement is
October , 2009.
PRESENTATION
OF INFORMATION
These offering materials consist of two documents: (a) this
Prospectus Supplement, which describes the terms of the
certificates that we are currently offering, and (b) the
accompanying Prospectus, which provides general information
about our pass through certificates, some of which may not apply
to the certificates that we are currently offering. The
information in this Prospectus Supplement replaces any
inconsistent information included in the accompanying Prospectus.
We have given certain capitalized terms specific meanings for
purposes of this Prospectus Supplement. The Index of
Terms attached as Appendix I to this Prospectus
Supplement lists the page in this Prospectus Supplement on which
we have defined each such term.
At various places in this Prospectus Supplement and the
Prospectus, we refer you to other sections of such documents for
additional information by indicating the caption heading of such
other sections. The page on which each principal caption
included in this Prospectus Supplement and the Prospectus can be
found is listed in the Table of Contents below. All such cross
references in this Prospectus Supplement are to captions
contained in this Prospectus Supplement and not in the
Prospectus, unless otherwise stated.
S-2
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Prospectus
Supplement
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
|
S-6
|
|
|
S-7
|
|
|
S-8
|
|
|
S-9
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
|
S-17
|
|
|
S-17
|
|
|
S-21
|
|
|
S-24
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
|
S-27
|
|
|
S-27
|
|
|
S-28
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
|
S-31
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
|
S-33
|
|
|
S-34
|
|
|
S-34
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
|
S-37
|
|
|
S-44
|
|
|
S-45
|
|
|
S-45
|
|
|
S-45
|
|
|
S-48
|
|
|
S-48
|
|
|
S-48
|
|
|
S-48
|
|
|
S-48
|
|
|
S-49
|
|
|
S-50
|
|
|
S-51
|
|
|
S-51
|
|
|
S-51
|
|
|
S-54
|
|
|
S-56
|
|
|
S-56
|
|
|
S-57
|
|
|
S-57
|
|
|
S-59
|
|
|
S-59
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
|
S-63
|
|
|
S-63
|
|
|
S-63
|
|
|
S-64
|
|
|
S-65
|
|
|
S-65
|
|
|
S-66
|
|
|
S-66
|
|
|
S-66
|
|
|
S-66
|
|
|
S-67
|
|
|
S-68
|
|
|
S-68
|
|
|
S-68
|
|
|
S-70
|
|
|
S-70
|
|
|
S-71
|
|
|
S-74
|
|
|
S-74
|
|
|
S-75
|
|
|
S-76
|
|
|
S-76
|
|
|
S-76
|
|
|
S-76
|
|
|
S-78
|
|
|
S-78
|
|
|
S-79
|
|
|
S-79
|
|
|
S-79
|
|
|
S-80
|
|
|
S-81
|
|
|
S-84
|
|
|
S-85
|
|
|
S-85
|
|
|
S-86
|
|
|
Appendix I
|
|
|
Appendix II
|
|
|
Appendix III
|
|
|
Appendix IV
|
S-3
Prospectus
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which this document refers you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may be used only where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may be
accurate only on the date of this document.
S-4
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this
Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Prospectus and may
not contain all of the information that is important to you. For
more complete information about the Certificates and
Continental, you should read this entire Prospectus Supplement
and the accompanying Prospectus, as well as the materials filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission that are considered
to be part of this Prospectus Supplement and the Prospectus. See
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference in
this Prospectus Supplement and the Prospectus.
Summary
of Terms of Certificates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Certificates
|
|
Class B Certificates
|
|
Aggregate Face Amount
|
|
$474,273,000
|
|
$105,000,000
|
Interest Rate
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
Ratings:
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Baa2
|
|
Ba2
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
A−
|
|
BBB−
|
Initial Loan to Aircraft Value (cumulative)(1)
|
|
54.0%
|
|
65.6%
|
Highest Loan to Aircraft Value (cumulative)(2)
|
|
54.0%
|
|
65.6%
|
Expected Principal Distribution Window (in years)
|
|
1.0 - 10.0
|
|
1.0 - 7.5
|
Initial Average Life (in years from Issuance Date)
|
|
7.9
|
|
4.9
|
Regular Distribution Dates
|
|
May 10 and November 10
|
|
May 10 and November 10
|
Final Expected Distribution Date
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
Final Maturity Date
|
|
May 10, 2021
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
Minimum Denomination
|
|
$1,000
|
|
$1,000
|
Section 1110 Protection
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
Liquidity Facility Coverage
|
|
3 semiannual
interest payments
|
|
3 semiannual
interest payments
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These percentages are calculated
assuming that the first seven Boeing
737-824
aircraft of the nine new Boeing
737-824
aircraft from which Continental may choose are financed
hereunder and are determined as of November 10, 2010, the
first Regular Distribution Date after all Aircraft are expected
to have been financed pursuant to the Offering. In calculating
these percentages, we have assumed that the financings of all
Aircraft hereunder are completed prior to such date and that the
aggregate appraised value of such Aircraft is $854,694,620 as of
such date. The appraised value is only an estimate and reflects
certain assumptions. See Description of the Aircraft and
the Appraisals The Appraisals.
|
|
(2)
|
|
See Loan to
Aircraft Value Ratios.
|
S-5
Equipment
Notes and the Aircraft
The 17 Aircraft to be financed pursuant to this Offering will
consist of eight Boeing aircraft currently owned by Continental
and nine new Boeing aircraft. The eight currently owned aircraft
consist of three
Boeing 737-824
aircraft, three Boeing 757-224 aircraft, one
Boeing 767-424ER
aircraft and one
Boeing 777-224ER
aircraft. The nine new aircraft consist of seven Boeing
737-824
aircraft, which will be selected by Continental from among nine
Boeing
737-824
aircraft scheduled for delivery from January to June 2010, and
two Boeing
777-224ER
aircraft scheduled for delivery in April and May 2010. See
Description of the Aircraft and the Appraisals
The Appraisals for a description of the nine new Boeing
737-824
aircraft from which Continental will select the seven aircraft
of such model that may be financed under this Offering. Set
forth below is certain information about the Equipment Notes
expected to be held in the Trusts and the aircraft expected to
secure such Equipment Notes (assuming for purposes of the chart
below that the first seven Boeing
737-824
aircraft of the nine Boeing
737-824
aircraft from which Continental may choose are financed
hereunder):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registration
|
|
Manufacturers
|
|
|
Delivery
|
|
of Equipment
|
|
|
Appraised
|
|
Aircraft Type(1)
|
|
Number
|
|
Serial Number
|
|
|
Month(2)
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
N14235
|
|
|
28947
|
|
|
August 1999
|
|
$
|
19,017,000
|
|
|
$
|
28,833,333
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
N37253
|
|
|
30584
|
|
|
September 2000
|
|
|
18,547,000
|
|
|
|
28,120,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
N76254
|
|
|
30779
|
|
|
September 2000
|
|
|
17,748,000
|
|
|
|
26,910,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
N76519
|
|
|
30132
|
|
|
January 2010
|
|
|
32,582,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
N77520
|
|
|
31658
|
|
|
January 2010
|
|
|
32,582,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
N79521
|
|
|
31662
|
|
|
February 2010
|
|
|
32,582,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
N76522
|
|
|
31660
|
|
|
February 2010
|
|
|
32,582,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
N76523
|
|
|
37101
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
32,582,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
N78524
|
|
|
31642
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
32,582,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
N77525
|
|
|
31659
|
|
|
April 2010
|
|
|
32,582,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing
757-224
|
|
N17139
|
|
|
30352
|
|
|
February 2000
|
|
|
15,189,000
|
|
|
|
23,030,000
|
|
Boeing
757-224
|
|
N41140
|
|
|
30353
|
|
|
February 2000
|
|
|
15,563,000
|
|
|
|
23,596,667
|
|
Boeing
757-224
|
|
N19141
|
|
|
30354
|
|
|
June 2000
|
|
|
16,825,000
|
|
|
|
25,510,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing
767-424ER
|
|
N67052
|
|
|
29447
|
|
|
September 2000
|
|
|
29,427,000
|
|
|
|
44,616,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing
777-224ER
|
|
N79011
|
|
|
29859
|
|
|
June 1999
|
|
|
47,131,000
|
|
|
|
71,460,000
|
|
Boeing
777-224ER
|
|
N76021
|
|
|
39776
|
|
|
April 2010
|
|
|
85,807,000
|
|
|
|
130,100,000
|
|
Boeing
777-224ER
|
|
N77022
|
|
|
39777
|
|
|
May 2010
|
|
|
85,945,000
|
|
|
|
130,310,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The indicated registration number,
manufacturers serial number and delivery month for each
new aircraft reflect our current expectations, although these
may differ for the actual aircraft financed hereunder. The
deadline for purposes of financing an Aircraft pursuant to this
Offering is August 31, 2010. The financing of each
currently-owned Aircraft pursuant to this Offering is expected
to be effected after the existing security interest on such
Aircraft has been discharged, and the financing of each new
Aircraft is expected to be effected at delivery of such Aircraft
by Boeing to Continental. The actual delivery date for any new
aircraft may be subject to delay or acceleration. See
Description of the Aircraft and the Appraisals
Timing of Financing the Aircraft. Continental has certain
rights to substitute other new aircraft if the scheduled
delivery date of any new Aircraft is delayed for more than
30 days after the month scheduled for delivery. See
Description of the Aircraft and the Appraisals
Substitute Aircraft.
|
|
(2)
|
|
An Aircraft with a Delivery Month
prior to the date of this Prospectus Supplement is a
currently-owned Aircraft, and an Aircraft with a Delivery Month
after the date of this Prospectus Supplement is a new Aircraft.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The appraised value of each
Aircraft set forth above is the lesser of the average and median
values of such Aircraft as appraised by three independent
appraisal and consulting firms. In the case of the new Aircraft,
such appraisals indicate appraised base value, projected as of
the scheduled delivery month of the applicable Aircraft, and in
the case of the currently-owned Aircraft, such appraisals
indicate appraised base value, adjusted for the maintenance
status of the applicable Aircraft. These appraisals are based
upon varying assumptions and methodologies. An appraisal is only
an estimate of value and should not be relied upon as a measure
of realizable value. See Risk Factors Risk
Factors Relating to the Certificates and the
Offering The Appraisals Are Only Estimates of
Aircraft Value. The appraised value of each other new
Boeing
737-824
aircraft that Continental may choose to finance pursuant to this
Offering is higher than or equal to the appraised value of each
of the new Aircraft of the same model listed above. See
Description of the Aircraft and the Appraisals
The Appraisals.
|
S-6
Loan to
Aircraft Value Ratios
The following table sets forth loan to Aircraft value ratios
(LTVs) for each Class of Certificates as of
November 10, 2010, the first Regular Distribution Date
after all Aircraft are expected to have been financed pursuant
to the Offering, and each Regular Distribution Date thereafter.
The LTVs for any Class of Certificates for the period prior to
November 10, 2010, are not meaningful, since during such
period all of the Equipment Notes expected to be acquired by the
Trusts and the related Aircraft will not be included in the
calculation. The table should not be considered a forecast or
prediction of expected or likely LTVs but simply a mathematical
calculation based on one set of assumptions. See Risk
Factors Risk Factors Relating to the Certificates
and the Offering The Appraisals Are Only Estimates
of Aircraft Value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance(2)
|
|
|
LTV(3)
|
|
Regular
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
Distribution Date
|
|
Aircraft Value(1)
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
$
|
854,694,620
|
|
|
$
|
461,201,785
|
|
|
$
|
99,742,345
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
65.6
|
%
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
839,834,021
|
|
|
|
451,408,049
|
|
|
|
93,903,150
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
824,973,423
|
|
|
|
439,433,874
|
|
|
|
87,983,837
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
|
|
63.9
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
810,112,825
|
|
|
|
427,435,271
|
|
|
|
82,062,711
|
|
|
|
52.8
|
|
|
|
62.9
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
795,252,226
|
|
|
|
415,413,611
|
|
|
|
76,076,906
|
|
|
|
52.2
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
780,391,628
|
|
|
|
403,367,366
|
|
|
|
70,050,221
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
765,531,029
|
|
|
|
391,294,871
|
|
|
|
63,930,249
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
|
|
59.5
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
750,670,431
|
|
|
|
379,174,136
|
|
|
|
57,765,705
|
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
735,077,764
|
|
|
|
366,721,638
|
|
|
|
51,569,261
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
719,320,598
|
|
|
|
353,891,972
|
|
|
|
45,375,295
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
703,220,028
|
|
|
|
340,798,750
|
|
|
|
39,173,252
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
686,436,947
|
|
|
|
327,292,187
|
|
|
|
32,951,608
|
|
|
|
47.7
|
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
669,653,866
|
|
|
|
317,282,917
|
|
|
|
26,725,991
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
652,870,784
|
|
|
|
307,273,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
636,087,703
|
|
|
|
297,265,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
619,304,622
|
|
|
|
287,257,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
602,521,541
|
|
|
|
277,249,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
585,738,459
|
|
|
|
267,242,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
568,223,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We have assumed that all Aircraft
will be financed under this Offering prior to November 10,
2010, and that the initial appraised value of each Aircraft,
determined as described under Equipment Notes
and the Aircraft, declines by approximately 3% per year
for the first 15 years after the year of delivery of such
Aircraft, 4% per year for each of the next five years and 5% per
year for any subsequent year, in each case prior to the final
expected Regular Distribution Date. Other rates or methods of
depreciation may result in materially different LTVs. We cannot
assure you that the depreciation rate and method used for
purposes of the table will occur or predict the actual future
value of any Aircraft. See Risk Factors Risk
Factors Relating to the Certificates and the
Offering The Appraisals Are Only Estimates of
Aircraft Value.
|
|
(2)
|
|
In calculating the outstanding
balances of each Class of Certificates, we have assumed that the
Trusts will acquire the Equipment Notes for all Aircraft.
Outstanding balances as of each Regular Distribution Date are
shown after giving effect to distributions expected to be made
on such distribution date.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The LTVs for each Class of
Certificates were obtained for each Regular Distribution Date by
dividing (i) the expected outstanding balance of such Class
(together, in the case of the Class B Certificates, with
the expected outstanding balance of the Class A
Certificates) after giving effect to the distributions expected
to be made on such distribution date, by (ii) the assumed
value of all of the Aircraft on such date based on the
assumptions described above. For purposes of these calculations,
it has been assumed that the first seven Boeing
737-824
aircraft of the nine new Boeing
737-824
aircraft from which Continental may choose are financed
hereunder. The outstanding balances and LTVs of each Class of
Certificates will change if the Trusts do not acquire Equipment
Notes with respect to all the Aircraft. The LTVs will change if
the Trusts acquire Equipment Notes with respect to the other
Boeing
737-824
aircraft that Continental may choose.
|
S-7
Cash Flow
Structure
Set forth below is a diagram illustrating the structure for the
offering of the Certificates and certain cash flows.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Each Aircraft will be subject to a
separate Indenture.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The Liquidity Facility for each of
the Class A and B Certificates will be sufficient to cover
three consecutive semiannual interest payments with respect to
such Class, except that the Liquidity Facilities will not cover
interest on the Deposits.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The proceeds of the offering of
each Class of Certificates will initially be held in escrow and
deposited with the Depositary, pending financing of each
Aircraft. The Depositary will hold such funds as interest
bearing Deposits. Each Trust will withdraw funds from the
Deposits relating to such Trust to purchase Equipment Notes from
time to time as each Aircraft is financed. The scheduled
payments of interest on the Equipment Notes and on the Deposits
relating to a Trust, taken together, will be sufficient to pay
accrued interest on the outstanding Certificates of such Trust.
If any funds remain as Deposits with respect to a Trust at the
Delivery Period Termination Date, such funds will be withdrawn
by the Escrow Agent and distributed to the holders of the
Certificates issued by such Trust, together with accrued and
unpaid interest thereon. No interest will accrue with respect to
the Deposits after they have been fully withdrawn.
|
S-8
The
Offering
|
|
|
Certificates Offered |
|
Class A Pass Through Certificates, Series 2009-2.
|
|
|
|
Class B Pass Through Certificates, Series 2009-2.
|
|
|
|
Each Class of Certificates will represent a fractional undivided
interest in a related Trust. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
The proceeds from the sale of the Certificates of each Trust
will initially be held in escrow and deposited with the
Depositary, pending financing of each Aircraft under this
Offering. Each Trust will withdraw funds from the escrow
relating to such Trust to acquire Equipment Notes as these
Aircraft are financed. The Equipment Notes will be issued to
generate cash for Continentals general corporate purposes
from eight Boeing aircraft currently owned by Continental and to
finance the purchase by Continental of nine new Boeing aircraft. |
|
Subordination Agent, Trustee, Paying Agent and Loan Trustee
|
|
Wilmington Trust Company. |
|
Escrow Agent |
|
Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, National Association. |
|
Depositary |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon. |
|
Liquidity Provider |
|
Natixis S.A., acting through its New York Branch. |
|
Trust Property |
|
The property of each Trust will include: |
|
|
|
Equipment Notes acquired by such Trust.
|
|
|
|
All monies receivable under the Liquidity Facility
for such Trust.
|
|
|
|
Funds from time to time deposited with the
applicable Trustee in accounts relating to such Trust, including
payments made by Continental on the Equipment Notes held in such
Trust.
|
|
Regular Distribution Dates |
|
May 10 and November 10, commencing on May 10, 2010. |
|
Record Dates |
|
The fifteenth day preceding the related Distribution Date. |
|
Distributions |
|
The Trustee will distribute all payments of principal, premium
(if any) and interest received on the Equipment Notes held in
each Trust to the holders of the Certificates of such Trust,
subject to the subordination provisions applicable to the
Certificates. |
|
|
|
Scheduled payments of principal and interest made on the
Equipment Notes will be distributed on the applicable Regular
Distribution Dates. |
|
|
|
Payments of principal, premium (if any) and interest made on the
Equipment Notes resulting from any early redemption of such
Equipment Notes will be distributed on a special distribution
date after not less than 15 days notice from the
Trustee to the applicable Certificateholders. |
|
Subordination |
|
Distributions on the Certificates will be made in the following
order: |
|
|
|
First, to the holders of the Class A
Certificates to pay interest on the Class A Certificates.
|
|
|
|
Second, to the holders of Class B Certificates
to pay interest on the Preferred B Pool Balance.
|
S-9
|
|
|
|
|
Third, to the holders of the Class A
Certificates to make distributions in respect of the Pool
Balance of the Class A Certificates.
|
|
|
|
Fourth, to the holders of the Class B
Certificates to pay interest on the Pool Balance of the
Class B Certificates not previously distributed under
clause Second above.
|
|
|
|
Fifth, to the holders of the Class B
Certificates to make distributions in respect of the Pool
Balance of the Class B Certificates.
|
|
Control of Loan Trustee |
|
The holders of at least a majority of the outstanding principal
amount of Equipment Notes issued under each Indenture will be
entitled to direct the Loan Trustee under such Indenture in
taking action as long as no Indenture Default is continuing
thereunder. If an Indenture Default is continuing, subject to
certain conditions, the Controlling Party will
direct the Loan Trustee under such Indenture (including in
exercising remedies, such as accelerating such Equipment Notes
or foreclosing the lien on the Aircraft securing such Equipment
Notes). |
|
|
|
The Controlling Party will be: |
|
|
|
The Class A Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Upon payment of final distributions to the holders
of Class A Certificates, the Class B Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Under certain circumstances, and notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Liquidity Provider with the largest amount owed
to it.
|
|
|
|
In exercising remedies during the nine months after the earlier
of (a) the acceleration of the Equipment Notes issued
pursuant to any Indenture or (b) the bankruptcy of
Continental, the Equipment Notes and the Aircraft subject to the
lien of such Indenture may not be sold for less than certain
specified minimums. |
|
Right to Purchase Other Classes of Certificates
|
|
If Continental is in bankruptcy and certain specified
circumstances then exist: |
|
|
|
The Class B Certificateholders will have the
right to purchase all but not less than all of the Class A
Certificates.
|
|
|
|
If an additional class of junior certificates has
been issued, the holders of such junior certificates will have
the right to purchase all but not less than all of the
Class A and Class B Certificates.
|
|
|
|
The purchase price will be the outstanding balance of the
applicable Class of Certificates plus accrued and unpaid
interest. |
|
Liquidity Facilities |
|
Under the Liquidity Facility for each of the Trusts, the
Liquidity Provider will, if necessary, make advances in an
aggregate amount sufficient to pay interest on the applicable
Certificates on up to three successive semiannual Regular
Distribution Dates at the interest rate for such Certificates.
Drawings under the Liquidity Facilities cannot be used to pay
any amount in respect of the Certificates other than interest
and will not cover interest payable on amounts held in escrow as
Deposits with the Depositary. |
|
|
|
Notwithstanding the subordination provisions applicable to the
Certificates, the holders of the Certificates to be issued by
the Class A |
S-10
|
|
|
|
|
Trust or the Class B Trust will be entitled to receive and
retain the proceeds of drawings under the Liquidity Facility for
such Trust. |
|
|
|
Upon each drawing under any Liquidity Facility to pay interest
on the Certificates, the Subordination Agent will reimburse the
applicable Liquidity Provider for the amount of such drawing.
Such reimbursement obligation and all interest, fees and other
amounts owing to the Liquidity Provider under each Liquidity
Facility and certain other agreements will rank equally with
comparable obligations relating to the other Liquidity Facility
and will rank senior to the Certificates in right of payment. |
|
Escrowed Funds |
|
Funds in escrow for the Certificateholders of each Trust will be
held by the Depositary as Deposits relating to such Trust. The
Trustees may withdraw these funds from time to time to purchase
Equipment Notes prior to the deadline established for purposes
of this Offering. On each Regular Distribution Date, the
Depositary will pay interest accrued on the Deposits relating to
such Trust at a rate per annum equal to the interest rate
applicable to the Certificates issued by such Trust. The
Deposits relating to each Trust and interest paid thereon will
not be subject to the subordination provisions applicable to the
Certificates. The Deposits cannot be used to pay any other
amount in respect of the Certificates. |
|
Unused Escrowed Funds |
|
All of the Deposits held in escrow may not be used to purchase
Equipment Notes by the deadline established for purposes of this
Offering. This may occur because of delays in the financing of
Aircraft or other reasons. See Description of the
Certificates Obligation to Purchase Equipment
Notes. If any funds remain as Deposits with respect to any
Trust after such deadline, such funds will be withdrawn by the
Escrow Agent for such Trust and distributed, with accrued and
unpaid interest, to the Certificateholders of such Trust after
at least 15 days prior written notice. See
Description of the Deposit Agreements Unused
Deposits. |
|
Obligation to Purchase Equipment Notes
|
|
The Trustees will be obligated to purchase the Equipment Notes
issued with respect to each Aircraft pursuant to the Note
Purchase Agreement. Continental will enter into a secured debt
financing with respect to each Aircraft pursuant to financing
agreements substantially in the forms attached to the Note
Purchase Agreement. The terms of such financing agreements must
not vary the Required Terms set forth in the Note Purchase
Agreement. In addition, Continental must certify to the Trustees
that any substantive modifications do not materially and
adversely affect the Certificateholders. Continental must also
obtain written confirmation from each Rating Agency that the use
of financing agreements modified in any material respect from
the forms attached to the Note Purchase Agreement will not
result in a withdrawal, suspension or downgrading of the rating
of any Class of Certificates. The Trustees will not be obligated
to purchase Equipment Notes if, at the time of issuance,
Continental is in bankruptcy or certain other specified events
have occurred. See Description of the
Certificates Obligation to Purchase Equipment
Notes. |
S-11
|
|
|
Issuances of Additional Classes of Certificates
|
|
After the Delivery Period Termination Date, additional pass
through certificates of one or more separate pass through
trusts, which will evidence fractional undivided ownership
interests in equipment notes secured by Aircraft, may be issued.
Any such transaction may relate to a refinancing of
Series B Equipment Notes issued with respect to all (but
not less than all) of the Aircraft or the issuance of a single
new series of subordinated equipment notes with respect to some
or all of the Aircraft. The holders of additional pass through
certificates relating to such subordinated equipment notes will
have the right to purchase all of the Class A and B
Certificates under certain circumstances after a bankruptcy of
Continental at the outstanding principal balance of the
Certificates plus accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts
due to Certificateholders, but without a premium. Consummation
of any such issuance of additional pass through certificates
will be subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including
receipt of confirmation from the Rating Agencies that it will
not result in a withdrawal, suspension or downgrading of any
Class of Certificates that remains outstanding. See
Possible Issuance of Additional Junior Certificates and
Refinancing of Certificates. |
|
Equipment Notes |
|
|
|
(a) Issuer |
|
Continental. |
|
(b) Interest |
|
The Equipment Notes held in each Trust will accrue interest at
the rate per annum for the Certificates issued by such Trust set
forth on the cover page of this Prospectus Supplement. Interest
will be payable on May 10 and November 10 of each year,
commencing on the first such date after issuance of such
Equipment Notes. Interest is calculated on the basis of a
360-day year
consisting of twelve
30-day
months. |
|
(c) Principal |
|
Principal payments on the Equipment Notes are scheduled on May
10 and November 10 in certain years, commencing on
November 10, 2010. |
|
(d) Redemption |
|
Aircraft Event of Loss. If an Event of Loss occurs with
respect to an Aircraft, all of the Equipment Notes issued with
respect to such Aircraft will be redeemed, unless Continental
replaces such Aircraft under the related financing agreements.
The redemption price in such case will be the unpaid principal
amount of such Equipment Notes, together with accrued interest,
but without any premium. |
|
|
|
Optional Redemption. Continental may elect to redeem all
of the Equipment Notes issued with respect to an Aircraft prior
to maturity, provided that all outstanding Equipment Notes with
respect to all other Aircraft are simultaneously redeemed. In
addition, Continental may elect to redeem the Series B
Equipment Notes in connection with a refinancing of such Series.
The redemption price in such case will be the unpaid principal
amount of such Equipment Notes, together with accrued interest
and Make-Whole Premium. |
|
(e) Security |
|
The Equipment Notes issued with respect to each Aircraft will be
secured by a security interest in such Aircraft. |
|
(f) Cross-collateralization |
|
The Equipment Notes held in the Trusts will be
cross-collateralized. This means that any proceeds from the
exercise of remedies with respect to an |
S-12
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft will be available to cover shortfalls then due under
Equipment Notes issued with respect to the other Aircraft. In
the absence of any such shortfall, excess proceeds will be held
by the relevant Loan Trustee as additional collateral for such
other Equipment Notes. |
|
(g) Cross-default |
|
There will be cross-default provisions in the Indentures. This
means that if the Equipment Notes issued with respect to one
Aircraft are in default, the Equipment Notes issued with respect
to the remaining Aircraft will also be in default, and remedies
will be exercisable with respect to all Aircraft. |
|
(h) Section 1110 Protection |
|
Continentals outside counsel will provide its opinion to
the Trustees that the benefits of Section 1110 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code will be available with respect to the Equipment
Notes. |
|
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences
|
|
Each person acquiring an interest in Certificates generally
should report on its federal income tax return its pro rata
share of income from the relevant Deposits and income from the
Equipment Notes and other property held by the relevant Trust.
See Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences. |
|
Certain ERISA Considerations |
|
Each person who acquires a Certificate will be deemed to have
represented that either: (a) no employee benefit plan
assets have been used to purchase or hold such Certificate or
(b) the purchase and holding of such Certificate are exempt
from the prohibited transaction restrictions of ERISA and the
Code pursuant to one or more prohibited transaction statutory or
administrative exemptions. See Certain ERISA
Considerations. |
|
Rating of the Certificates |
|
It is a condition to the issuance of the Certificates that they
be rated by Moodys and Standard & Poors
not less than the ratings set forth below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard &
|
Certificates
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Poors
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Baa2
|
|
|
|
A−
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Ba2
|
|
|
|
BBB−
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A rating is not a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell
Certificates, since such rating does not address market price or
suitability for a particular investor. There can be no assurance
that such ratings will not be lowered, suspended or withdrawn by
a Rating Agency after the Certificates have been issued. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard &
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Poors
|
|
Threshold Rating for the Depositary
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
P-1
|
|
|
|
A-1+
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary Rating |
|
The Depositary meets the Depositary Threshold Rating requirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard &
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Poors
|
|
Threshold Rating for the Liquidity Provider
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
P-1
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity Provider Rating |
|
The Liquidity Provider meets the Liquidity Threshold Rating
requirement. |
S-13
SUMMARY
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
The following tables summarize certain consolidated financial
data and certain operating data with respect to Continental. The
following selected consolidated financial data for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are derived from
the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Continental
including the notes thereto included in Continentals
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, and incorporated
by reference in this Prospectus Supplement and should be read in
conjunction with those financial statements. The following
selected consolidated financial data for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of Continental
including the notes thereto included in Continentals
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 24, 2009, and incorporated by reference in this
Prospectus Supplement and should be read in conjunction with
those financial statements. The following selected consolidated
financial data for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004 are derived from the selected financial data contained in
Continentals Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 24, 2009, and incorporated by reference in this
Prospectus Supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions except per share data and ratios)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue
|
|
$
|
9,404
|
|
|
$
|
11,771
|
|
|
$
|
15,241
|
|
|
$
|
14,232
|
|
|
$
|
13,128
|
|
|
$
|
11,208
|
|
|
$
|
9,899
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
9,551
|
|
|
|
12,060
|
|
|
|
15,555
|
|
|
|
13,545
|
|
|
|
12,660
|
|
|
|
11,247
|
|
|
|
10,137
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
$
|
(2.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.54
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.53
|
|
|
$
|
4.05
|
|
|
$
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.96
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.54
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.53
|
|
|
$
|
3.76
|
|
|
$
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
$
|
(2.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.54
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.05
|
|
|
$
|
3.51
|
|
|
$
|
(1.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.02
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.54
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.05
|
|
|
$
|
3.28
|
|
|
$
|
(1.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.42
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes the following special
income (expense) items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Operating (expense) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension settlement/curtailment charges
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aircraft-related charges, net of gains on sales of
aircraft.
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Severance
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Route impairment and other
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Nonoperating (expense) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on fuel hedge contracts with Lehman Brothers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of auction rate securities, net of put right received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax credit (expense) related to NOL utilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
For purposes of calculating this
ratio, earnings consist of income before income taxes and
cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles adjusted
for undistributed income of companies in which Continental has a
minority equity interest plus interest expense (net of
capitalized interest), the portion of rental expense
representative of interest expense and amortization of
previously capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of
interest expenses, the portion of rental expense representative
of interest expense, the amount amortized for debt discount,
premium and issuance expense and interest previously
capitalized. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, and the years ended December 31, 2008, 2005 and
2004, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges and the
coverage deficiency was $365 million, $435 million,
$702 million, $109 million and $496 million,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
2,542
|
|
|
$
|
2,643
|
|
|
$
|
2,803
|
|
|
$
|
2,484
|
|
|
$
|
1,957
|
|
|
$
|
1,458
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
12,596
|
|
|
|
12,686
|
|
|
|
12,105
|
|
|
|
11,308
|
|
|
|
10,529
|
|
|
|
10,511
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
5,290
|
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
|
|
4,337
|
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
|
5,113
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
S-15
Selected
Operating Data
Continental has two reportable segments: mainline and regional.
The mainline segment consists of flights to cities using larger
jets while the regional segment currently consists of flights
with a capacity of 78 or fewer seats. As of September 30,
2009, the regional segment was operated by ExpressJet Airlines,
Chautauqua Airlines, CommutAir and Colgan Airlines under
capacity purchase agreements with Continental.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Mainline Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers (thousands)(1)
|
|
|
34,619
|
|
|
|
37,714
|
|
|
|
48,682
|
|
|
|
50,960
|
|
|
|
48,788
|
|
|
|
44,939
|
|
|
|
42,743
|
|
Revenue passenger miles (millions)(2)
|
|
|
60,589
|
|
|
|
64,258
|
|
|
|
82,806
|
|
|
|
84,309
|
|
|
|
79,192
|
|
|
|
71,261
|
|
|
|
65,734
|
|
Available seat miles (millions)(3)
|
|
|
74,119
|
|
|
|
79,124
|
|
|
|
102,527
|
|
|
|
103,139
|
|
|
|
97,667
|
|
|
|
89,647
|
|
|
|
84,672
|
|
Cargo ton miles (millions)
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
Passenger load factor(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mainline
|
|
|
81.7
|
%
|
|
|
81.2
|
%
|
|
|
80.8
|
%
|
|
|
81.7
|
%
|
|
|
81.1
|
%
|
|
|
79.5
|
%
|
|
|
77.6
|
%
|
Domestic
|
|
|
84.9
|
%
|
|
|
83.5
|
%
|
|
|
83.3
|
%
|
|
|
83.9
|
%
|
|
|
83.6
|
%
|
|
|
81.2
|
%
|
|
|
77.4
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
78.8
|
%
|
|
|
78.9
|
%
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
|
|
79.4
|
%
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
|
|
77.5
|
%
|
|
|
77.9
|
%
|
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents)
|
|
|
9.36
|
|
|
|
11.13
|
|
|
|
11.10
|
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
|
|
9.96
|
|
|
|
9.32
|
|
|
|
8.82
|
|
Total revenue per available seat mile (cents)
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
|
|
12.51
|
|
|
|
12.51
|
|
|
|
11.65
|
|
|
|
11.17
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
|
|
9.83
|
|
Average yield per revenue passenger mile (cents)(5)
|
|
|
11.45
|
|
|
|
13.71
|
|
|
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
12.80
|
|
|
|
12.29
|
|
|
|
11.73
|
|
|
|
11.37
|
|
Average fare per revenue passenger
|
|
$
|
202.62
|
|
|
$
|
236.09
|
|
|
$
|
232.26
|
|
|
$
|
214.06
|
|
|
$
|
201.81
|
|
|
$
|
188.67
|
|
|
$
|
177.90
|
|
Cost per available seat mile, including special charges (cents)
|
|
|
10.60
|
|
|
|
12.49
|
|
|
|
12.44
|
|
|
|
10.83
|
|
|
|
10.56
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
|
|
9.84
|
|
Special charges (credits) per available seat mile (cents)
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Average price per gallon of fuel, including fuel taxes
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
|
$
|
3.38
|
|
|
$
|
3.27
|
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
Fuel gallons consumed (millions)
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
Aircraft in fleet at end of period(6)
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Average length of aircraft flight (miles)
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
Average daily utilization of each aircraft (hours)(7)
|
|
|
10:45
|
|
|
|
11:22
|
|
|
|
11:06
|
|
|
|
11:34
|
|
|
|
11:07
|
|
|
|
10:31
|
|
|
|
9:55
|
|
Regional Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers (thousands)(1)
|
|
|
12,932
|
|
|
|
13,795
|
|
|
|
18,010
|
|
|
|
17,970
|
|
|
|
18,331
|
|
|
|
16,076
|
|
|
|
13,739
|
|
Revenue passenger miles (millions)(2)
|
|
|
6,984
|
|
|
|
7,604
|
|
|
|
9,880
|
|
|
|
9,856
|
|
|
|
10,325
|
|
|
|
8,938
|
|
|
|
7,417
|
|
Available seat miles (millions)(3)
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
9,938
|
|
|
|
12,984
|
|
|
|
12,599
|
|
|
|
13,251
|
|
|
|
11,973
|
|
|
|
10,410
|
|
Passenger load factor(4)
|
|
|
76.4
|
%
|
|
|
76.5
|
%
|
|
|
76.1
|
%
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
|
|
77.9
|
%
|
|
|
74.7
|
%
|
|
|
71.3
|
%
|
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents)
|
|
|
15.22
|
|
|
|
18.35
|
|
|
|
18.14
|
|
|
|
17.47
|
|
|
|
17.15
|
|
|
|
15.67
|
|
|
|
15.09
|
|
Average yield per revenue passenger mile (cents)(5)
|
|
|
19.93
|
|
|
|
23.98
|
|
|
|
23.83
|
|
|
|
22.33
|
|
|
|
22.01
|
|
|
|
20.99
|
|
|
|
21.18
|
|
Aircraft in fleet at end of period(6)
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Consolidated Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers (thousands)(1)
|
|
|
47,551
|
|
|
|
51,509
|
|
|
|
66,692
|
|
|
|
68,930
|
|
|
|
67,119
|
|
|
|
61,015
|
|
|
|
56,482
|
|
Revenue passenger miles (millions)(2)
|
|
|
67,573
|
|
|
|
71,862
|
|
|
|
92,686
|
|
|
|
94,165
|
|
|
|
89,517
|
|
|
|
80,199
|
|
|
|
73,151
|
|
Available seat miles (millions)(3)
|
|
|
83,264
|
|
|
|
89,062
|
|
|
|
115,511
|
|
|
|
115,738
|
|
|
|
110,918
|
|
|
|
101,620
|
|
|
|
95,082
|
|
Passenger load factor(4)
|
|
|
81.2
|
%
|
|
|
80.7
|
%
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
|
|
81.4
|
%
|
|
|
80.7
|
%
|
|
|
78.9
|
%
|
|
|
76.9
|
%
|
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents)
|
|
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
11.94
|
|
|
|
11.89
|
|
|
|
11.23
|
|
|
|
10.82
|
|
|
|
10.07
|
|
|
|
9.51
|
|
Average yield per revenue passenger mile (cents)(5)
|
|
|
12.33
|
|
|
|
14.80
|
|
|
|
14.82
|
|
|
|
13.80
|
|
|
|
13.41
|
|
|
|
12.76
|
|
|
|
12.36
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The number of revenue passengers
measured by each flight segment flown.
|
(2)
|
|
The number of scheduled miles flown
by revenue passengers.
|
(3)
|
|
The number of seats available for
passengers multiplied by the number of scheduled miles those
seats are flown.
|
(4)
|
|
Revenue passenger miles divided by
available seat miles.
|
(5)
|
|
The average passenger revenue
received for each revenue passenger mile flown.
|
(6)
|
|
Excludes aircraft that were removed
from service. Regional aircraft include aircraft operated by all
carriers under capacity purchase agreements with Continental,
but exclude any aircraft operated by other operators outside the
scope of Continentals capacity purchase agreements.
|
(7)
|
|
The average number of hours per day
that an aircraft flown in revenue service is operated (from gate
departure to gate arrival).
|
S-16
RISK
FACTORS
Risk
Factors Relating to the Company
Fuel
prices or disruptions in fuel supplies could have a material
adverse effect on us
Expenditures for fuel and related taxes represent one of the
largest costs of operating our business. These costs include
fuel costs on flights flown for us under capacity purchase
agreements. Our operations depend on the availability of jet
fuel supplies, and our results are significantly impacted by
changes in jet fuel prices, which have been extremely volatile
in the last 18 months. Jet fuel prices decreased
precipitously in the last six months of 2008 after increasing
significantly in 2007 and achieving record levels in mid-2008.
Although we experienced some success in raising ticket prices
and adding or increasing other fees during part of 2008, we were
unable to increase our revenue sufficiently to keep pace with
the escalating fuel prices and suffered a substantial loss in
2008. If fuel prices rise significantly from their current
levels, we may be unable to increase fares or other fees
sufficiently in the current financial environment to offset
fully our increased fuel costs.
We routinely hedge a portion of our future fuel requirements to
protect against rising fuel costs. However, there can be no
assurance that, at any given point in time, our hedge contracts
will provide any particular level of protection against
increased fuel costs or that our counterparties will be able to
perform under our hedge contracts, such as in the case of a
counterpartys bankruptcy. Additionally, a deterioration in
our financial condition could negatively affect our ability to
enter into new hedge contracts in the future.
Significant declines in fuel prices (such as those experienced
in the last six months of 2008) may increase the costs
associated with our fuel hedging arrangements to the extent we
have entered into swaps or collars. Swaps and the put option
sold as part of a collar obligate us to make payments to the
counterparty upon settlement of the contracts if the price of
the commodity hedged falls below the
agreed-upon
amount. Declining crude oil prices have resulted in us being
required to post significant amounts of collateral to cover
potential amounts owed with respect to contracts that have not
yet settled. Additionally, lower fuel prices may result in
increased industry capacity and lower fares, especially to the
extent that reduced fuel costs justify increased utilization by
airlines of less fuel efficient aircraft that are unprofitable
during periods of higher fuel prices.
Fuel prices could increase dramatically and supplies could be
disrupted as a result of international political and economic
circumstances, such as increasing international demand resulting
from a global economic recovery, conflicts or instability in the
Middle East or other oil producing regions and diplomatic
tensions between the United States and oil producing nations, as
well as OPEC production decisions, disruptions of oil imports,
environmental concerns, weather, refinery outages or maintenance
and other unpredictable events.
Further volatility in jet fuel prices or disruptions in fuel
supplies, whether as a result of natural disasters or otherwise,
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity.
We
have changed our global airline alliance, which involves
significant transition and integration risks
During 2008, we entered into framework agreements with United
Air Lines, Inc. (United), Lufthansa and Air Canada,
each a member of Star Alliance, pursuant to which we exited the
SkyTeam Alliance effective with our last flight on
October 24, 2009 and joined Star Alliance on
October 27, 2009. This change from SkyTeam to Star Alliance
involves significant transition and integration risks, both
because we were required to end our participation in SkyTeam and
wind down our SkyTeam relationships prior to our being able to
participate in Star Alliance and because we may incur costs
and/or a
loss of revenue (or a delay in anticipated increased revenue
from the new alliance) in connection with these changes. The
significant transition and integration risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
significant revenue dilution as we wind down our participation
in SkyTeam
and/or
insufficient, or delay in receipt of, revenue from our
participation in Star Alliance, including an inability to
maintain our key customer and business relationships as we
transition to Star Alliance; and
|
|
|
|
difficulties integrating our technology processes with Star
Alliance members.
|
S-17
In addition, the full implementation of some of the arrangements
contemplated by our framework agreements requires the approval
of domestic and foreign regulatory agencies. These agencies may
deny us necessary approvals, delay certain approvals or, in
connection with granting any such approvals, impose
requirements, limitations or costs on us or on Star Alliance
members, or require us or them to divest slots, gates, routes or
other assets. In certain cases, such actions could prevent us
from consummating some of the transactions contemplated by the
framework agreements.
If any of these risks or costs materialize, they could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
The
troubled global capital markets coupled with our high leverage
may affect our ability to satisfy our significant financing
needs or meet our obligations
As is the case with many of our principal competitors, we have a
high proportion of debt compared to our capital. We have a
significant amount of fixed obligations, including debt,
aircraft leases and financings, leases of airport property and
other facilities and pension funding obligations. At
September 30, 2009, we had approximately $6.0 billion
of debt and capital lease obligations, including
$2.2 billion that will come due by the end of 2011.
In addition, we have substantial non-cancelable commitments for
capital expenditures, including the acquisition of new aircraft
and related spare engines. To meet these obligations, we must
access the global capital markets
and/or
achieve and sustain profitability. Due to the troubled global
capital markets, however, we may be unable to obtain financing
or otherwise access the capital markets on favorable terms.
Credit
rating downgrades could have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity
Reductions in our credit ratings may increase the cost and
reduce the availability of financing to us in the future. We do
not have any debt obligations that would be accelerated as a
result of a credit rating downgrade. However, we would have to
post additional collateral under our credit card processing
agreements with Chase Bank USA, N.A. (Chase) and
American Express and under our workers compensation
program if our debt rating falls below specified levels.
Failure
to meet our financial covenants would adversely affect our
liquidity
Our credit card processing agreement with Chase (the Chase
processing agreement) contains financial covenants which
require, among other things, that we post additional cash
collateral if we fail to maintain (1) a minimum level of
unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments,
(2) a minimum ratio of unrestricted cash, cash equivalents
and short-term investments to current liabilities of 0.25 to 1.0
or (3) a minimum senior unsecured debt rating of at least
Caa3 and CCC− from Moodys and
Standard & Poors, respectively. If a covenant
trigger under the Chase processing agreement results in our
posting additional collateral under that agreement, we would
also be required to post additional collateral under our credit
card processing agreement with American Express.
The amount of additional cash collateral that we may be required
to post in the event of our failure to comply with the financial
covenants described above, which is based on our then-current
air traffic liability exposure (as defined in each agreement),
could be significant.
Depending on our unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments balance at the time, the posting of a
significant amount of cash collateral could cause our
unrestricted cash and short-term investments balance to fall
below the minimum balance of $1.0 billion required under
our $350 million secured term loan facility, resulting in a
default under that facility. The posting of such additional
collateral under these circumstances
and/or the
acceleration of amounts borrowed under our secured term loan
facility (or other remedies pursued by the lenders thereunder)
would likely have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition.
We are currently in compliance with all of the covenants under
these agreements.
S-18
Our
obligations for funding our defined benefit pension plans are
affected by factors beyond our control
We have defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all
of our U.S. employees other than employees of Chelsea Food
Services and CMI. The timing and amount of our funding
requirements under these plans depend upon a number of factors,
including labor negotiations and changes to pension plan
benefits as well as factors outside of our control, such as the
number of retiring employees, asset returns, interest rates and
changes in pension laws. Changes to these and other factors,
such as liquidity requirements, that can significantly increase
our funding requirements could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition.
Delays
in scheduled aircraft deliveries continue to adversely affect
our ability to expand our international capacity
Because all of our widebody aircraft are already fully utilized,
we will need to acquire additional widebody aircraft to grow
internationally when the level of demand for international air
travel supports such growth. We have contractual commitments to
purchase the long-range widebody aircraft that we currently
believe are necessary for our international growth, but
significant delays in their deliveries have occurred. We have
been, and continue to be, adversely impacted by those delays. If
significant delays in the deliveries of these new aircraft
continue to occur, we will only be able to accomplish
international growth by trying to make alternate arrangements to
acquire the necessary long-range aircraft, possibly on less
financially favorable terms, including higher ownership and
operating costs and potentially involving less efficient
aircraft and significant delivery delays as well.
Labor
disruptions could adversely affect our operations
Although we enjoy generally good relations with our employees,
we can provide no assurance that we will be able to maintain
these good relations in the future or avoid labor disruptions,
including a strike. Many of our collective bargaining agreements
have amendable dates that began in December 2008, including
those with the unions representing our pilots and mechanics. We
are currently in talks with representatives of the applicable
unions. We cannot predict the outcome of these negotiations, and
any labor disruption, including a strike, that results in a
prolonged significant reduction in flights would have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
Our
labor costs may not be competitive
Labor costs constitute a significant percentage of our total
operating costs. All of the major
hub-and-spoke
carriers with whom we compete have achieved significant labor
cost reductions, whether in or out of bankruptcy. We believe
that our wages, salaries and benefits cost per available seat
mile, measured on a stage length adjusted basis, is higher than
that of many of our competitors. These higher labor costs may
adversely affect our ability to achieve and sustain
profitability while competing with other airlines that have
achieved lower relative labor costs. Additionally, we cannot
predict the outcome of our ongoing negotiations with our
unionized workgroups, although significant increases in the pay
and benefits resulting from new collective bargaining agreements
could have a material adverse effect on us.
If we
experience problems with certain of our third party regional
operators, our operations could be materially adversely
affected
All of our regional operations are conducted by third party
operators on our behalf, primarily under capacity purchase
agreements. Due to our reliance on third parties to provide
these essential services, we are subject to the risks of
disruptions to their operations, which may result from many of
the same risk factors disclosed in this Prospectus Supplement.
In addition, we may also experience disruption to our regional
operations if we terminate the capacity purchase agreement with
one or more of our current operators and transition the services
to another provider. As our regional segment provides revenue to
us directly and indirectly (by providing flow traffic to our
hubs), a significant disruption to our regional operations could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
S-19
Interruptions
or disruptions in service at one of our hub airports could have
a material adverse effect on our operations
We operate principally through our hub operations at
metropolitan New Yorks Newark Liberty International
Airport, Houstons George Bush International Airport,
Clevelands Hopkins International Airport and Guams
A.B. Won Pat International Airport. Substantially all of our
flights either originate from or fly into one of these
locations, contributing to a large amount of origin and
destination traffic. A significant interruption or
disruption in service at one of our hubs resulting from air
traffic control delays, weather conditions or events, growth
constraints, relations with third party service providers,
failure of computer systems, labor relations, fuel supplies,
terrorist activities or otherwise could result in the
cancellation or delay of a significant portion of our flights
and, as a result, our business could be materially adversely
affected.
We
could experience adverse publicity and declining revenues as a
result of an accident involving our aircraft or the aircraft of
our regional carriers
Any accident involving an aircraft that we operate or an
aircraft that is operated under our brand by one of our regional
carriers could have a material adverse effect on us if such
accident created a public perception that our operations or
those of our regional carriers are less safe or reliable than
other airlines, resulting in passengers being reluctant to fly
on our aircraft or those of our regional carriers. In addition,
any such accident could expose us to significant tort liability.
Although we currently maintain liability insurance in amounts
and of the type we believe to be consistent with industry
practice to cover damages arising from any such accidents, and
our regional carriers carry similar insurance and generally
indemnify us for their operations on our behalf, if our
liability exceeds the applicable policy limits or the ability of
a carrier to indemnify us, we could incur substantial losses
from an accident.
A
significant failure or disruption of the computer systems on
which we rely could adversely affect our business
We depend heavily on computer systems and technology to operate
our business, such as flight operations systems, communications
systems, airport systems and reservations systems (including
continental.com and third party global distribution systems).
These systems could suffer substantial or repeated disruptions
due to events beyond our control, including natural disasters,
power failures, terrorist attacks, equipment or software
failures, computer viruses or hackers. Any such disruptions
could materially impair our flight and airport operations and
our ability to market our services, and could result in
increased costs, lost revenue and the loss or compromise of
important data. Although we have taken measures in an effort to
reduce the adverse effects of certain potential failures or
disruptions, if these steps are not adequate to prevent or
remedy the risks, our business may be materially adversely
affected.
Our
net operating loss carryforwards may be limited
At December 31, 2008, we had estimated net operating loss
carryforwards (NOLs) of $3.8 billion for
federal income tax purposes that expire beginning in 2009 and
continuing through 2028. Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code (Section 382) imposes limitations
on a corporations ability to utilize NOLs if it
experiences an ownership change. In general terms,
an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the
ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation
by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period.
In the event of an ownership change, utilization of our NOLs
would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382
determined by multiplying the value of our stock at the time of
the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate
(which is 5.40% for December 2008). Any unused annual limitation
may be carried over to later years.
For purposes of Section 382, increases in share holdings
by, or that result in a person becoming, a holder of 5% or more
of the outstanding shares of our common stock are aggregated for
purposes of determining whether an ownership change
has occurred. Because our common stock has been trading at low
market prices, the cost of acquiring a sufficient number of
shares of our common stock to become a holder of 5% or more of
the outstanding shares, and the cost of acquiring additional
shares by existing holders, has decreased significantly from
historical levels, increasing the possibility that we could
experience an ownership change. Although we cannot
currently
S-20
predict whether or when such an ownership change may
occur, an ownership change as of September 30, 2009 would
have resulted in a $101 million limit to our annual NOL
utilization, before consideration of any built-in gains. The
imposition of this limitation on our ability to use our NOLs to
offset future taxable income could cause us to pay
U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation
were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused,
reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs. In addition,
depending on the market value of our common stock at the time of
any such ownership change, we could be required to recognize a
significant non-cash tax charge, the amount of which we cannot
estimate at this time.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Airline Industry
The
global recession could continue to result in less demand for air
travel
The U.S. and global economies are currently in a recession.
The airline industry is highly cyclical, and the level of demand
for air travel is correlated to the strength of the
U.S. and global economies. For 2008, a year in which the
U.S. gross domestic product experienced its largest
contraction in 25 years, traffic for the seven largest
U.S. carriers, measured in miles flown by revenue
passengers, fell approximately 2% as compared to 2007, the first
such annual decline in five years. This decline in demand has
disproportionately reduced the volume of high yield traffic in
the premium cabins on international flights, as many business
and leisure travelers are either curtailing their international
travel or purchasing lower yield economy tickets. A prolonged
recession in the U.S. or global economies that continues to
contribute to the loss of business and leisure traffic,
particularly the loss of high yield international traffic in our
first class and BusinessFirst cabins, could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
The
airline industry is highly competitive and susceptible to price
discounting
The U.S. airline industry is characterized by substantial
price competition, especially in domestic markets. Carriers use
discount fares to stimulate traffic during periods of slack
demand, or when they begin service to new cities or have excess
capacity, to generate cash flow and to establish, increase or
preserve market share. Some of our competitors have greater
financial resources (including a larger percentage or more
favorable fuel hedges against price increases)
and/or lower
cost structures than we do, some of which is the result of
bankruptcies
and/or
mergers. In recent years, the domestic market share held by
low-cost carriers has increased significantly and is expected to
continue to increase. The increased market presence of low-cost
carriers, which engage in substantial price discounting, has
diminished the ability of the network carriers to maintain
sufficient fare levels in domestic markets to achieve sustained
profitability. We cannot predict whether or for how long these
trends will continue.
In addition to price competition, airlines also compete for
market share by increasing the size of their route system and
the number of markets they serve. Several of our domestic
competitors have increased their international capacity,
including service to some destinations that we currently serve.
Additionally, the open skies agreement between the
United States and the European Union, which became effective on
March 30, 2008, is resulting in increased competition from
European and U.S. airlines in these international markets,
and may give rise to additional consolidation or better
integration opportunities among European carriers. The increased
competition in these international markets, particularly to the
extent our competitors engage in price discounting, may have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition or liquidity.
Expanded
government regulation could further increase our operating costs
and restrict our ability to conduct our business
Airlines are subject to extensive regulatory and legal
compliance requirements that result in significant costs and can
adversely affect us. Additional laws, regulations, airport rates
and charges and growth constraints have been proposed from time
to time that could significantly increase the cost of airline
operations or reduce revenue. In addition, to address concerns
about airport congestion, the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) has designated certain airports, including New
York Liberty, Kennedy and LaGuardia as high density
traffic airports, and has imposed operating restrictions
at these three airports, which may include capacity reductions.
In addition, the FAA has designated New York Liberty and Kennedy
as Level 3 Coordinated Airports under the International Air
Transport Association Worldwide Scheduling Guidelines, which
requires us to participate in seasonal FAA
S-21
procedures for capacity allocation and schedule coordination for
New York Liberty and to have slots to operate at that airport.
Additional restrictions on airline routes and takeoff and
landing slots may be proposed that could affect rights of
ownership and transfer. Although we do not believe that these
current operating restrictions will have a material adverse
effect on our operations at New York Liberty, we cannot predict
the impact of future capacity constraints or allocations or
other restrictions on our operations that might be imposed by
the FAA, Congress or other regulators, which could have a
material adverse effect on us.
The FAA from time to time issues directives and other
regulations relating to the maintenance and operation of
aircraft that require significant expenditures or operational
restrictions. Some FAA requirements cover, among other things,
retirement of older aircraft, security measures, collision
avoidance systems, airborne windshear avoidance systems, noise
abatement and other environmental concerns, aircraft operation
and safety and increased inspections and maintenance procedures
to be conducted on older aircraft.
Many aspects of airlines operations also are subject to
increasingly stringent federal, state, local and foreign laws
protecting the environment, including the imposition of
additional taxes on airlines or their passengers. Future
regulatory developments in the United States and abroad could
adversely affect operations and increase operating costs in the
airline industry. The European Union has issued a directive to
member states to include aviation in its Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Trading Scheme by February 2010, which will require us
to have emissions allowances to operate flights to and from
member states of the European Union in January 2012 and
thereafter, including flights between the United States and the
European Union. Non-EU governments are expected to challenge the
application of the EU emissions trading scheme to their
airlines; however, we may be forced to comply with the EU
emission trading scheme requirements during a legal challenge.
We may have to purchase emissions allowances through the EU
emissions trading scheme to cover EU flights that exceed our
free allotment, which could result in substantial costs for us.
Other regulatory actions that may be taken in the future by the
U.S. government, other foreign governments or the
International Civil Aviation Organization to address concerns
about climate change and air emissions from the aviation sector
are unknown at this time. Climate change legislation has been
introduced in the U.S. Congress, including a proposal to
require transportation fuel producers and importers to purchase
emission credits. It is currently unknown, however, if any such
legislation will pass the Congress or, if passed and enacted
into law, how it would specifically apply to the aviation
industry. The impact to us and our industry from such actions is
likely to be adverse and could be significant, particularly if
regulators were to conclude that emissions from commercial
aircraft cause significant harm to the upper atmosphere or have
a greater impact on climate change than other industries.
Potential actions may include the imposition of requirements to
purchase emission offsets or credits, which could require
participation in emission trading (such as required in the
European Union), substantial taxes on emissions and growth
restrictions on airline operations, among other potential
regulatory actions.
Further, the ability of U.S. carriers to operate
international routes is subject to change because the applicable
arrangements between the United States and foreign governments
may be amended from time to time, or because appropriate slots
or facilities are not made available. We cannot provide
assurance that laws or regulations enacted in the future will
not have a significant adverse effect on us.
Additional
terrorist attacks or international hostilities may further
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
and liquidity
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 involving
commercial aircraft severely and adversely affected our
financial condition, results of operations and liquidity and the
airline industry generally. Additional terrorist attacks, even
if not made directly on the airline industry, or the fear of
such attacks (including elevated national threat warnings or
selective cancellation or redirection of flights due to terror
threats such as the August 2006 terrorist plot targeting
multiple airlines, including us), could negatively affect us and
the airline industry. The potential negative effects include
increased security, insurance and other costs for us and lost
revenue from increased ticket refunds and decreased ticket
sales. Our financial resources might not be sufficient to absorb
the adverse effects of any further terrorist attacks or other
international hostilities involving the United States.
S-22
Additional
security requirements may increase our costs and decrease our
traffic
Since September 11, 2001, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) and the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) have implemented numerous
security measures that affect airline operations and costs, and
they are likely to implement additional measures in the future.
Most recently, DHS has begun to implement the US-VISIT program
(a program of fingerprinting and photographing foreign visa
holders), announced that it will implement greater use of
passenger data for evaluating security measures to be taken with
respect to individual passengers, expanded the use of federal
air marshals on our flights (who do not pay for their seats and
thus displace revenue passengers and cause increased customer
complaints from displaced passengers), begun investigating a
requirement to install aircraft security systems (such as
devices on commercial aircraft as countermeasures against
portable
surface-to-air
missiles) and expanded cargo and baggage screening. DHS also has
required certain flights to be cancelled on short notice for
security reasons, and has required certain airports to remain at
higher security levels than other locations. In addition,
foreign governments also have begun to institute additional
security measures at foreign airports we serve, out of their own
security concerns or in response to security measures imposed by
the United States.
Moreover, the TSA has imposed measures affecting the contents of
baggage that may be carried on an aircraft. The TSA and other
security regulators could impose other measures as necessary to
respond to security threats that may arise in the future.
A large portion of the costs of these security measures is borne
by the airlines and their passengers, and we believe that these
and other security measures have the effect of decreasing the
demand for air travel and the overall attractiveness of air
transportation as compared to other modes of transportation.
Additional security measures required by the U.S. and
foreign governments in the future, such as further expanded
cargo screening, might increase our costs or decrease the demand
for air travel, adversely affecting our financial results.
The
airline industry is heavily taxed
The airline industry is subject to extensive government fees and
taxation that negatively impact our revenue. The
U.S. airline industry is one of the most heavily taxed of
all industries. These fees and taxes have grown significantly in
the past decade for domestic flights, and various U.S. fees
and taxes also are assessed on international flights. In
addition, the governments of foreign countries in which we
operate impose on U.S. airlines, including us, various fees
and taxes, and these assessments have been increasing in number
and amount in recent years. Certain of these fees and taxes must
be included in the fares we advertise or quote to our customers.
Due to the competitive revenue environment, many increases in
these fees and taxes have been absorbed by the airline industry
rather than being passed on to the passenger. Further increases
in fees and taxes may reduce demand for air travel and thus our
revenues.
Airlines
may continue to participate in industry consolidation or
alliances, which could have a material adverse effect on
us
We are facing stronger competition from carriers that have
participated in industry consolidation and from expanded airline
alliances and joint ventures.
Since its deregulation in 1978, the U.S. airline industry
has undergone substantial consolidation and additional
consolidation may occur in light of the recently completed
merger of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) and
Northwest Airlines, Inc. (Northwest), which changed
the competitive environment for us and the entire airline
industry. As a result of the announcement of the Delta/Northwest
merger agreement, we conducted a comprehensive review of our
strategic alternatives and announced in April 2008 that we had
determined that the best course for us was not to merge with
another airline at such time. Through consolidation, carriers
have the opportunity to significantly expand the reach of their
networks, which is of primary importance to business travelers,
and to achieve cost reductions by eliminating redundancy in
their networks and their management structures.
Through participation in airline alliances
and/or joint
ventures, carriers granted anti-trust immunity by the
appropriate regulatory authorities are able to coordinate their
routes, pool their revenues and costs and enjoy other mutual
benefits, such as frequent flier program reciprocity, achieving
many of the benefits of consolidation. For
S-23
example, Air France-KLM, Delta and Northwest have received
anti-trust immunity to form a new trans-Atlantic joint venture
among those airlines and to coordinate routes, fares, schedules
and other matters among those airlines, Alitalia and CSA Czech
Airlines. American Airlines, British Airways and Iberia have
requested anti-trust immunity for a similar trans-Atlantic joint
venture, which would also involve many of the same benefits.
There may be additional consolidation or changes in airline
alliances
and/or joint
ventures in the future, any of which could change the
competitive landscape for the airline industry and have a
material adverse effect on us.
Insurance
costs could increase materially or key coverage could become
unavailable
The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks led to a
significant increase in insurance premiums and a decrease in the
insurance coverage available to commercial airlines.
Furthermore, our ability to continue to obtain certain types of
insurance remains uncertain. Since the terrorist attacks, the
U.S. government has provided war risk (terrorism) insurance
to U.S. commercial airlines to cover losses. War risk
insurance in amounts necessary for our operations, and at
premiums that are not excessive, is not currently available in
the commercial insurance market. If the government discontinues
this coverage in whole or in part, we may be able to obtain
comparable coverage in the commercial insurance market only, if
it is available at all, for substantially higher premiums and on
more restrictive terms. If we are unable to obtain adequate war
risk insurance, our business could be materially and adversely
affected.
Public
health threats affecting travel behavior could have a material
adverse effect on the industry
Public health threats, such as the H1N1 flu virus, the bird flu,
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARs) and other highly
communicable diseases, outbreaks of which have occurred in
various parts of the world in which we operate, could have a
significant adverse impact on our operations and the worldwide
demand for air travel. Travel restrictions or operational
problems, such as quarantining of personnel or inability to
access our facilities or aircraft in any part of the world in
which we operate, or any reduction in the demand for air travel
caused by public health threats in the future, could materially
adversely affect our operations and financial results.
Our
results of operations fluctuate due to seasonality and other
factors associated with the airline industry
Due to greater demand for air travel during the summer months,
revenue in the airline industry in the second and third quarters
of the year is generally stronger than revenue in the first and
fourth quarters of the year for most U.S. air carriers. Our
results of operations generally reflect this seasonality, but
also have been impacted by numerous other factors that are not
necessarily seasonal, including excise and similar taxes,
weather and air traffic control delays, as well as the other
factors discussed above. As a result, our operating results for
a quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating
results for an entire year, and historical operating results are
not necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Certificates and the Offering
The
Appraisals Are Only Estimates of Aircraft Value
Three independent appraisal and consulting firms have prepared
appraisals of the Aircraft. Letters summarizing such appraisals
are annexed to this Prospectus Supplement as Appendix II.
Such appraisals are based on varying assumptions and
methodologies, which differ among the appraisers, and were
prepared without physical inspection of the Aircraft. Appraisals
that are based on other assumptions and methodologies may result
in valuations that are materially different from those contained
in such appraisals. See Description of the Aircraft and
the Appraisals The Appraisals.
An appraisal is only an estimate of value. It does not indicate
the price at which an Aircraft may be purchased from the
Aircraft manufacturer. Nor should an appraisal be relied upon as
a measure of realizable value. The proceeds realized upon a sale
of any Aircraft may be less than its appraised value. In
particular, the appraisals of the new Aircraft are estimates of
values as of future delivery dates. The value of an Aircraft if
remedies are exercised under the applicable Indenture will
depend on market and economic conditions, the supply of similar
aircraft, the
S-24
availability of buyers, the condition of the Aircraft and other
factors. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the
proceeds realized upon any such exercise of remedies would be
sufficient to satisfy in full payments due on the Certificates.
Certain
Certificateholders May Not Participate In Controlling the
Exercise of Remedies in a Default Scenario
If an Indenture Default is continuing, subject to certain
conditions, the Loan Trustee under such Indenture will be
directed by the Controlling Party in exercising
remedies under such Indenture, including accelerating the
applicable Equipment Notes or foreclosing the lien on the
Aircraft securing such Equipment Notes. See Description of
the Certificates Indenture Defaults and Certain
Rights Upon an Indenture Default.
The Controlling Party will be:
|
|
|
|
|
The Class A Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Upon payment of final distributions to the holders of
Class A Certificates, the Class B Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Under certain circumstances, and notwithstanding the foregoing,
the Liquidity Provider with the largest amount owed to it.
|
As a result of the foregoing, if the Trustee for a Class of
Certificates is not the Controlling Party with respect to an
Indenture, the Certificateholders of that Class will have no
rights to participate in directing the exercise of remedies
under such Indenture.
The
Exercise of Remedies Over Equipment Notes May Result in
Shortfalls Without Further Recourse
During the continuation of any Indenture Default under an
Indenture, the Equipment Notes issued under such Indenture may
be sold in the exercise of remedies with respect to that
Indenture, subject to certain limitations. See Description
of the Intercreditor Agreement Intercreditor
Rights Limitation on Exercise of Remedies. The
market for Equipment Notes during any Indenture Default may be
very limited, and there can be no assurance as to the price at
which they could be sold. If any Equipment Notes are sold for
less than their outstanding principal amount, certain
Certificateholders will receive a smaller amount of principal
distributions under the relevant Indenture than anticipated and
will not have any claim for the shortfall against Continental,
any Liquidity Provider or any Trustee.
The
Ratings of the Certificates Are Not a Recommendation to Buy and
May Be Lowered or Withdrawn in the Future
It is a condition to the issuance of the Certificates that the
Class A Certificates be rated not lower than Baa2 by
Moodys and A− by Standard & Poors
and the Class B Certificates be rated not lower than Ba2 by
Moodys and BBB− by Standard & Poors.
A rating is not a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell
Certificates, because such rating does not address market price
or suitability for a particular investor. A rating may not
remain unchanged for any given period of time and may be
lowered, suspended or withdrawn entirely by a Rating Agency if
in its judgment circumstances in the future (including the
downgrading of Continental, the Depositary or a Liquidity
Provider) so warrant.
The rating of the Certificates is based primarily on the default
risk of the Equipment Notes and the Depositary, the availability
of the Liquidity Facilities for the benefit of holders of the
Class A and Class B Certificates, the collateral value
provided by the Aircraft relating to the Equipment Notes, the
cross-collateralization provisions applicable to the Indentures
and the subordination provisions applicable to the Certificates.
These ratings address the likelihood of timely payment of
interest (at the Stated Interest Rate and without any premium)
when due on the Certificates and the ultimate payment of
principal distributable under the Certificates by the Final
Maturity Date. The ratings do not address the possibility of
certain defaults, optional redemptions or other circumstances,
which could result in the payment of the outstanding principal
amount of the Certificates prior to the final expected
Distribution Date. Standard & Poors has
indicated that its rating applies to a unit consisting of
Certificates representing the Trust Property and Escrow
Receipts initially representing interests in $579,273,000 of
Deposits.
S-25
Amounts deposited under the Escrow Agreements are not property
of Continental and are not entitled to the benefits of
Section 1110 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and any
default arising under an Indenture solely by reason of the
cross-default in such Indenture may not be of a type required to
be cured under Section 1110 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code. Any cash collateral held as a result of the
cross-collateralization of the Equipment Notes also would not be
entitled to the benefits of Section 1110 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Neither the Certificates nor the
Escrow Receipts may be separately assigned or transferred.
Escrowed
Funds May Be Returned If They Are Not Used to Buy Equipment
Notes
Under certain circumstances, all of the funds held in escrow as
Deposits may not be used to purchase Equipment Notes by the
deadline established for purposes of this Offering. See
Description of the Deposit Agreements Unused
Deposits. If any funds remain as Deposits with respect to
any Trust after such deadline, they will be withdrawn by the
Escrow Agent for such Trust and distributed, with accrued and
unpaid interest but without any premium, to the
Certificateholders of such Trust. See Description of the
Deposit Agreements Unused Deposits.
There
May Be a Limited Market for Resale of Certificates
Prior to this Offering, there has been no public market for the
Certificates. Neither Continental nor any Trust intends to apply
for listing of the Certificates on any securities exchange or
otherwise. The Underwriters may assist in resales of the
Certificates, but they are not required to do so. A secondary
market for the Certificates may not develop. If a secondary
market does develop, it might not continue or it might not be
sufficiently liquid to allow you to resell any of your
Certificates.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
The proceeds from the sale of the Certificates being offered
hereby will be used to purchase Equipment Notes issued by
Continental during the Delivery Period to generate cash for
Continentals general corporate purposes from eight
Aircraft that it currently owns and to finance
Continentals purchase of seven new Boeing
737-824
Aircraft and two new Boeing
777-224ER
Aircraft. Before the proceeds are used to buy Equipment Notes,
such proceeds from the sale of the Certificates of each Trust
will be deposited with the Depositary on behalf of the
applicable Escrow Agent for the benefit of the holders of such
Certificates.
THE
COMPANY
Continental Airlines, Inc. (Continental or the
Company) is a major United States air carrier
engaged in the business of transporting passengers, cargo and
mail. Continental is the worlds fifth largest airline as
measured by the number of scheduled miles flown by revenue
passengers in 2008. Including Continentals wholly owned
subsidiary, Continental Micronesia, Inc. (CMI), and
regional flights operated on Continentals behalf under
capacity purchase agreements with other carriers, Continental
operates more than 2,000 daily departures. As of
September 30, 2009, Continental served 117 domestic and 117
international destinations and offered additional connecting
service through alliances with domestic and foreign carriers.
Continental directly served nine Canadian cities, 25 European
cities, seven South American cities, and six Asian cities from
the U.S. mainland as of September 30, 2009. In
addition, Continental provides service to more destinations in
Mexico and Central America than any other U.S. airline,
serving 38 cities. Through its Guam hub, CMI provides
extensive service in the western Pacific, including service to
more Japanese cities than any other U.S. carrier. The
Companys executive offices are located at 1600 Smith
Street, Houston, Texas 77002. The Companys telephone
number is
(713) 324-2950
and its website is www.continental.com. Information contained on
the Companys website is not part of, and is not
incorporated in, this Prospectus Supplement.
S-26
DESCRIPTION
OF THE CERTIFICATES
The following summary describes the material terms of the
Certificates. The summary does not purport to be complete and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to all of the provisions
of the Basic Agreement, which was filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Commission) as an exhibit
to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated September 25, 1997, and to all of the provisions of
the Certificates, the Trust Supplements, the Deposit
Agreements, the Escrow Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement
and the trust supplements applicable to the Successor Trusts,
each of which will be filed as an exhibit to a Current Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission. Except as
otherwise indicated, the following summary relates to each of
the Trusts and the Certificates issued by each Trust. The
references to Sections in parentheses in the following summary
are to the relevant Sections of the Basic Agreement unless
otherwise indicated.
General
Each Pass Through Certificate (collectively, the
Certificates) will represent a fractional undivided
interest in one of the two Continental Airlines
2009-2 Pass
Through Trusts (the Class A Trust and the
Class B Trust and, collectively, the
Trusts). (Section 2.01) The Trusts will be
formed pursuant to a pass through trust agreement between
Continental and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (the
Trustee), dated as of September 25, 1997 (the
Basic Agreement), and two separate supplements
thereto (each, a Trust Supplement and, together
with the Basic Agreement, collectively, the Pass Through
Trust Agreements) relating to such Trusts between
Continental and the Trustee, as trustee under the Class A
Trust (the Class A Trustee) and trustee under
the Class B Trust (the Class B Trustee).
The Certificates to be issued by the Class A Trust and the
Class B Trust are referred to herein as the
Class A Certificates and the Class B
Certificates.
Each Certificate will represent a fractional undivided interest
in the Trust created by the Basic Agreement and the applicable
Trust Supplement pursuant to which such Certificate is
issued. The Trust Property of each Trust (the
Trust Property) will consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to the Intercreditor Agreement, Equipment Notes acquired
under the Note Purchase Agreement and issued on a recourse basis
by Continental in a separate secured loan transaction in
connection with the financing by Continental of each Aircraft
during the Delivery Period. Equipment Notes held in each Trust
will be registered in the name of the Subordination Agent on
behalf of such Trust for purposes of giving effect to provisions
of the Intercreditor Agreement.
|
|
|
|
The rights of such Trust to acquire Equipment Notes under the
Note Purchase Agreement.
|
|
|
|
The rights of such Trust under the applicable Escrow Agreement
to request the Escrow Agent to withdraw from the Depositary
funds sufficient to enable such Trust to purchase Equipment
Notes after the initial issuance date of the Certificates (the
Issuance Date) during the Delivery Period.
|
|
|
|
The rights of such Trust under the Intercreditor Agreement
(including all monies receivable in respect of such rights).
|
|
|
|
All monies receivable under the Liquidity Facility for such
Trust.
|
|
|
|
Funds from time to time deposited with the applicable Trustee in
accounts relating to such Trust (such as interest and principal
payments on the Equipment Notes held in such Trust).
|
The Certificates of each Trust will be issued in fully
registered form only and will be subject to the provisions
described below under Book-Entry; Delivery and
Form. The Certificates will be issued only in minimum
denominations of $1,000 or integral multiples thereof, except
that one Certificate of each Trust may be issued in a different
denomination. (Section 3.01)
The Certificates represent interests in the respective Trusts,
and all payments and distributions thereon will be made only
from the Trust Property of the related Trust.
(Section 3.09) The Certificates do not represent an
interest in or obligation of Continental, any Trustee or any of
the Loan Trustees or any affiliate of any of the foregoing.
Pursuant to the Escrow Agreement applicable to each Trust, the
Certificateholders of such Trust as holders of the Escrow
Receipts affixed to each Certificate are entitled to certain
rights with respect to the Deposits relating to
S-27
such Trust. Accordingly, any transfer of a Certificate will have
the effect of transferring the corresponding rights with respect
to the Deposits, and rights with respect to the Deposits may not
be separately transferred by holders of the Certificates (the
Certificateholders). Rights with respect to the
Deposits and the Escrow Agreement relating to a Trust, except
for the right to request withdrawals for the purchase of
Equipment Notes, will not constitute Trust Property of such
Trust.
Payments
and Distributions
Payments of interest on the Deposits with respect to each Trust
and payments of principal, premium (if any) and interest on the
Equipment Notes or with respect to other Trust Property
held in each Trust will be distributed by the Paying Agent (in
the case of the Deposits) or by the Trustee (in the case of
Trust Property of such Trust) to Certificateholders of such
Trust on the date receipt of such payment is confirmed, except
in the case of certain types of Special Payments.
Interest
The Deposits held with respect to each Trust and the Equipment
Notes held in each Trust will accrue interest at the applicable
rate per annum for Certificates issued by such Trust set forth
on the cover page of this Prospectus Supplement, payable on May
10 and November 10 of each year, commencing on May 10, 2010
(or, in the case of Equipment Notes issued after such date,
commencing with the first May 10 or November 10 to occur after
such Equipment Notes are issued). Such interest payments will be
distributed to Certificateholders of such Trust on each such
date until the final Distribution Date for such Trust, subject
in the case of payments on the Equipment Notes to the
Intercreditor Agreement. Interest is calculated on the basis of
a 360-day
year consisting of twelve
30-day
months.
Payments of interest applicable to the Certificates issued by
each of the Trusts will be supported by a separate Liquidity
Facility to be provided by the Liquidity Provider for the
benefit of the holders of such Certificates in an aggregate
amount sufficient to pay interest thereon at the Stated Interest
Rate for such Trust on up to three successive Regular
Distribution Dates (without regard to any future payments of
principal on such Certificates), except that no Liquidity
Facility will cover interest payable by the Depositary on the
Deposits. The Liquidity Facility for any Class of Certificates
does not provide for drawings or payments thereunder to pay for
principal of or premium, if any, on the Certificates of such
Class, any interest on the Certificates of such Class in excess
of the Stated Interest Rate for such Certificates, or,
notwithstanding the subordination provisions of the
Intercreditor Agreement, principal of or interest or premium, if
any, on the Certificates of any other Class. Therefore, only the
holders of the Certificates to be issued by a particular Trust
will be entitled to receive and retain the proceeds of drawings
under the Liquidity Facility for such Trust. See
Description of the Liquidity Facilities.
Principal
Payments of principal of the Equipment Notes are scheduled to be
received by the Trustees on May 10 and November 10 in certain
years depending upon the terms of the Equipment Notes held in
such Trust.
Scheduled payments of interest on the Deposits and of interest
or principal on the Equipment Notes are herein referred to as
Scheduled Payments, and May 10 and November 10 of
each year, commencing on May 10, 2010, until the final
expected Regular Distribution Date are herein referred to as
Regular Distribution Dates. See Description of
the Equipment Notes Principal and Interest
Payments. The Final Maturity Date for the
Class A Certificates is May 10, 2021, and for the
Class B Certificates is November 10, 2018.
Distributions
The Paying Agent with respect to each Escrow Agreement will
distribute on each Regular Distribution Date to the
Certificateholders of the Trust to which such Escrow Agreement
relates all Scheduled Payments received in respect of the
related Deposits, the receipt of which is confirmed by such
Paying Agent on such Regular Distribution Date. The Trustee of
each Trust will distribute, subject to the Intercreditor
Agreement, on each Regular Distribution Date to the
Certificateholders of such Trust all Scheduled Payments received
in respect of Equipment Notes held on behalf of such Trust, the
receipt of which is confirmed by such Trustee on such Regular
Distribution Date. Each
S-28
Certificateholder of each Trust will be entitled to receive its
proportionate share, based upon its fractional interest in such
Trust, of any distribution in respect of Scheduled Payments of
interest on the Deposits relating to such Trust and, subject to
the Intercreditor Agreement, of principal or interest on
Equipment Notes held on behalf of such Trust. Each such
distribution of Scheduled Payments will be made by the
applicable Paying Agent or Trustee to the Certificateholders of
record of the relevant Trust on the record date applicable to
such Scheduled Payment subject to certain exceptions.
(Sections 4.01 and 4.02; Escrow Agreements,
Section 2.03) If a Scheduled Payment is not received by the
applicable Paying Agent or Trustee on a Regular Distribution
Date but is received within five days thereafter, it will be
distributed on the date received to such holders of record. If
it is received after such
five-day
period, it will be treated as a Special Payment and distributed
as described below.
Any payment in respect of, or any proceeds of, any Equipment
Note, or Collateral under (and as defined in) any Indenture
other than a Scheduled Payment (each, a Special
Payment) will be distributed on, in the case of an early
redemption or a purchase of any Equipment Note, the date of such
early redemption or purchase (which shall be a Business Day),
and otherwise on the Business Day specified for distribution of
such Special Payment pursuant to a notice delivered by each
Trustee as soon as practicable after such Trustee has received
funds for such Special Payment (each, a Special
Distribution Date). Any such distribution will be subject
to the Intercreditor Agreement. Any unused Deposits to be
distributed after the Delivery Period Termination Date or the
occurrence of a Triggering Event, together with accrued and
unpaid interest thereon (each, also a Special
Payment), will be distributed on a date 25 days after
the Paying Agent has received notice of the event requiring such
distribution (also, a Special Distribution Date).
However, if such date is within ten days before or after a
Regular Distribution Date, such Special Payment shall be made on
such Regular Distribution Date.
Triggering Event means (x) the occurrence of an
Indenture Default under all Indentures resulting in a PTC Event
of Default with respect to the most senior Class of Certificates
then outstanding, (y) the acceleration of all of the
outstanding Equipment Notes (provided that during the Delivery
Period the aggregate principal amount thereof exceeds
$240 million) or (z) certain bankruptcy or insolvency
events involving Continental.
Each Paying Agent, in the case of the Deposits, and each
Trustee, in the case of Trust Property, will mail a notice
to the Certificateholders of the applicable Trust stating the
scheduled Special Distribution Date, the related record date,
the amount of the Special Payment and the reason for the Special
Payment. In the case of a redemption or purchase of the
Equipment Notes held in the related Trust or any distribution of
unused Deposits after the Delivery Period Termination Date or
the occurrence of a Triggering Event, such notice will be mailed
not less than 15 days prior to the date such Special
Payment is scheduled to be distributed, and in the case of any
other Special Payment, such notice will be mailed as soon as
practicable after the Trustee has confirmed that it has received
funds for such Special Payment. (Section 4.02(c);
Trust Supplements, Section 3.03; Escrow Agreements,
Sections 2.03 and 2.06) Each distribution of a Special
Payment, other than a final distribution, on a Special
Distribution Date for any Trust will be made by the Paying Agent
or the Trustee, as applicable, to the Certificateholders of
record of such Trust on the record date applicable to such
Special Payment. (Section 4.02(b); Escrow Agreements,
Section 2.03) See Indenture Defaults and
Certain Rights Upon an Indenture Default and
Description of the Equipment Notes
Redemption.
Each Pass Through Trust Agreement requires that the Trustee
establish and maintain, for the related Trust and for the
benefit of the Certificateholders of such Trust, one or more
non-interest bearing accounts (the Certificate
Account) for the deposit of payments representing
Scheduled Payments received by such Trustee. Each Pass Through
Trust Agreement requires that the Trustee establish and
maintain, for the related Trust and for the benefit of the
Certificateholders of such Trust, one or more accounts (the
Special Payments Account) for the deposit of
payments representing Special Payments received by such Trustee,
which shall be non-interest bearing except in certain
circumstances where the Trustee may invest amounts in such
account in certain permitted investments. Pursuant to the terms
of each Pass Through Trust Agreement, the Trustee is
required to deposit any Scheduled Payments relating to the
applicable Trust received by it in the Certificate Account of
such Trust and to deposit any Special Payments so received by it
in the Special Payments Account of such Trust.
(Section 4.01; Trust Supplements, Section 3.02)
All amounts so deposited will be distributed by the Trustee on a
Regular Distribution Date or a Special Distribution Date, as
appropriate. (Section 4.02; Trust Supplements,
Section 3.03)
S-29
Each Escrow Agreement requires that the Paying Agent establish
and maintain, for the benefit of the Receiptholders, one or more
accounts (the Paying Agent Account), which shall be
non-interest bearing. Pursuant to the terms of the Escrow
Agreements, the Paying Agent is required to deposit interest on
Deposits relating to a Trust and any unused Deposits withdrawn
by the Escrow Agent in the related Paying Agent Account. All
amounts so deposited will be distributed by the Paying Agent on
a Regular Distribution Date or Special Distribution Date, as
appropriate.
The final distribution for each Trust will be made only upon
presentation and surrender of the Certificates for such Trust at
the office or agency of the Trustee specified in the notice
given by the Trustee of such final distribution. The Trustee
will mail such notice of the final distribution to the
Certificateholders of such Trust, specifying the date set for
such final distribution and the amount of such distribution.
(Trust Supplements, Section 7.01) See
Termination of the Trusts below.
Distributions in respect of Certificates issued in global form
will be made as described in Book-Entry;
Delivery and Form below.
If any Distribution Date is a Saturday, Sunday or other day on
which commercial banks are authorized or required to close in
New York, New York, Houston, Texas or Wilmington, Delaware (any
other day being a Business Day), distributions
scheduled to be made on such Regular Distribution Date or
Special Distribution Date will be made on the next succeeding
Business Day, without additional interest.
Pool
Factors
The Pool Balance for each Trust or for the
Certificates issued by any Trust indicates, as of any date, the
original aggregate face amount of the Certificates of such Trust
less the aggregate amount of all payments as of such date made
in respect of the Certificates of such Trust or in respect of
Deposits relating to such Trust other than payments made in
respect of interest or premium or reimbursement of any costs or
expenses incurred in connection therewith. The Pool Balance for
each Trust or for the Certificates issued by any Trust as of any
Distribution Date shall be computed after giving effect to any
special distribution with respect to unused Deposits, if any,
payment of principal of the Equipment Notes or payment with
respect to other Trust Property held in such Trust and the
distribution thereof to be made on that date.
(Trust Supplements, Section 2.01)
The Pool Factor for each Trust as of any
Distribution Date is the quotient (rounded to the seventh
decimal place) computed by dividing (i) the Pool Balance by
(ii) the original aggregate face amount of the Certificates
of such Trust. The Pool Factor for each Trust or for the
Certificates issued by any Trust as of any Distribution Date
shall be computed after giving effect to any special
distribution with respect to unused Deposits, payment of
principal of the Equipment Notes or payments with respect to
other Trust Property held in such Trust and the
distribution thereof to be made on that date. (Trust
Supplements, Section 2.01) The Pool Factor for each Trust
will be 1.0000000 on the date of issuance of the Certificates;
thereafter, the Pool Factor for each Trust will decline as
described herein to reflect reductions in the Pool Balance of
such Trust. The amount of a Certificateholders pro rata
share of the Pool Balance of a Trust can be determined by
multiplying the par value of the holders Certificate of
such Trust by the Pool Factor for such Trust as of the
applicable Distribution Date. Notice of the Pool Factor and the
Pool Balance for each Trust will be mailed to Certificateholders
of such Trust on each Distribution Date.
(Trust Supplements, Section 3.01)
S-30
The following table sets forth the expected aggregate principal
amortization schedule for the Equipment Notes held in each Trust
(the Assumed Amortization Schedule) and resulting
Pool Factors with respect to such Trust. The scheduled
distribution of principal payments for any Trust would be
affected if Equipment Notes with respect to any Aircraft are not
acquired by such Trust, if any Equipment Notes held in such
Trust are redeemed or purchased or if a default in payment on
such Equipment Notes occurs. Accordingly, the aggregate
principal amortization schedule applicable to a Trust and the
resulting Pool Factors may differ from those set forth in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
|
Scheduled
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
Scheduled
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
Date
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Factor
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Factor
|
|
|
Issuance Date
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1.0000000
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1.0000000
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1.0000000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1.0000000
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
13,071,214.51
|
|
|
|
0.9724395
|
|
|
|
5,257,654.52
|
|
|
|
0.9499271
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
9,793,736.80
|
|
|
|
0.9517895
|
|
|
|
5,839,195.68
|
|
|
|
0.8943157
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
11,974,174.49
|
|
|
|
0.9265420
|
|
|
|
5,919,312.67
|
|
|
|
0.8379413
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
11,998,602.84
|
|
|
|
0.9012431
|
|
|
|
5,921,125.90
|
|
|
|
0.7815496
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
12,021,660.01
|
|
|
|
0.8758956
|
|
|
|
5,985,804.93
|
|
|
|
0.7245420
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
12,046,244.92
|
|
|
|
0.8504962
|
|
|
|
6,026,685.58
|
|
|
|
0.6671450
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
12,072,495.22
|
|
|
|
0.8250414
|
|
|
|
6,119,971.86
|
|
|
|
0.6088595
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
12,120,734.92
|
|
|
|
0.7994850
|
|
|
|
6,164,544.05
|
|
|
|
0.5501496
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
12,452,498.33
|
|
|
|
0.7732290
|
|
|
|
6,196,443.91
|
|
|
|
0.4911358
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
12,829,665.84
|
|
|
|
0.7461778
|
|
|
|
6,193,965.63
|
|
|
|
0.4321457
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
13,093,222.60
|
|
|
|
0.7185708
|
|
|
|
6,202,043.73
|
|
|
|
0.3730786
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
13,506,562.28
|
|
|
|
0.6900924
|
|
|
|
6,221,643.98
|
|
|
|
0.3138248
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
10,009,269.99
|
|
|
|
0.6689879
|
|
|
|
6,225,616.42
|
|
|
|
0.2545332
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
10,008,929.24
|
|
|
|
0.6478842
|
|
|
|
26,725,991.14
|
|
|
|
0.0000000
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
10,008,561.62
|
|
|
|
0.6267813
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0000000
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
10,008,164.13
|
|
|
|
0.6056791
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0000000
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
10,007,733.53
|
|
|
|
0.5845779
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0000000
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
10,007,265.94
|
|
|
|
0.5634777
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0000000
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
267,242,262.79
|
|
|
|
0.0000000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0000000
|
|
The Pool Factor and Pool Balance of each Trust will be
recomputed if there has been an early redemption, purchase, or
default in the payment of principal or interest in respect of
one or more of the Equipment Notes held in a Trust, as described
in Indenture Defaults and Certain Rights Upon
an Indenture Default and Description of the
Equipment Notes Redemption, or a special
distribution attributable to unused Deposits after the Delivery
Period Termination Date or the occurrence of a Triggering Event,
as described in Description of the Deposit
Agreements. If the principal payments scheduled for a
Regular Distribution Date prior to the Delivery Period
Termination Date are changed, notice thereof will be mailed by
the Trustee to the Certificateholders by no later than the
15th day prior to such Regular Distribution Date. In the
event of (i) any other change in the scheduled repayments
from the Assumed Amortization Schedule or (ii) any such
redemption, purchase, default or special distribution, the Pool
Factors and the Pool Balances of each Trust so affected will be
recomputed after giving effect thereto and notice thereof will
be mailed by the Trustee to the Certificateholders of such Trust
promptly after the Delivery Period Termination Date in the case
of clause (i) and promptly after the occurrence of any
event described in clause (ii).
Reports
to Certificateholders
On each Distribution Date, the applicable Paying Agent and
Trustee will include with each distribution by it of a Scheduled
Payment or Special Payment to Certificateholders of the related
Trust a statement setting forth the following information (per
$1,000 aggregate principal amount of Certificate for such Trust,
except as to the amounts described in items (a) and
(f) below):
(a) The aggregate amount of funds distributed on such
Distribution Date under the Pass Through Trust Agreement
and under the Escrow Agreement, indicating the amount allocable
to each source, including any portion thereof paid by the
Liquidity Provider.
S-31
(b) The amount of such distribution under the Pass Through
Trust Agreement allocable to principal and the amount
allocable to premium, if any.
(c) The amount of such distribution under the Pass Through
Trust Agreement allocable to interest.
(d) The amount of such distribution under the Escrow
Agreement allocable to interest.
(e) The amount of such distribution under the Escrow
Agreement allocable to unused Deposits, if any.
(f) The Pool Balance and the Pool Factor for such Trust.
(Trust Supplements, Section 3.01(a))
So long as the Certificates are registered in the name of DTC or
its nominee, on the record date prior to each Distribution Date,
the applicable Trustee will request that DTC post on its
Internet bulletin board a securities position listing setting
forth the names of all DTC Participants reflected on DTCs
books as holding interests in the Certificates on such record
date. On each Distribution Date, the applicable Paying Agent and
Trustee will mail to each such DTC Participant the statement
described above and will make available additional copies as
requested by such DTC Participant for forwarding to Certificate
Owners. (Trust Supplements, Section 3.01(a))
In addition, after the end of each calendar year, the applicable
Trustee and Paying Agent will furnish to each Certificateholder
of each Trust at any time during the preceding calendar year a
report containing the sum of the amounts determined pursuant to
clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) above with respect
to such Trust for such calendar year or, in the event such
person was a Certificateholder of such Trust during only a
portion of such calendar year, for the applicable portion of
such calendar year, and such other items as are readily
available to such Trustee and which a Certificateholder of such
Trust shall reasonably request as necessary for the purpose of
such Certificateholders preparation of its
U.S. federal income tax returns. (Trust Supplements,
Section 3.01(b)) Such report and such other items shall be
prepared on the basis of information supplied to the applicable
Trustee by the DTC Participants and shall be delivered by such
Trustee to such DTC Participants to be available for forwarding
by such DTC Participants to Certificate Owners in the manner
described above. (Trust Supplements, Section 3.01(b))
At such time, if any, as the Certificates are issued in the form
of definitive certificates, the applicable Paying Agent and
Trustee will prepare and deliver the information described above
to each Certificateholder of record of each Trust as the name
and period of ownership of such Certificateholder appears on the
records of the registrar of the Certificates.
Each Trustee is required to provide promptly to
Certificateholders of the related Trust all material
non-confidential information received by such Trustee from
Continental. (Trust Supplements, Section 3.01(e))
Indenture
Defaults and Certain Rights Upon an Indenture Default
Upon the occurrence and continuation of an Indenture Default
under an Indenture, the Controlling Party will direct the Loan
Trustee under such Indenture in the exercise of remedies
thereunder and may accelerate and sell all (but not less than
all) of the Equipment Notes issued under such Indenture or sell
the collateral under such Indenture to any person, subject to
certain limitations. See Description of the Intercreditor
Agreement Intercreditor Rights
Limitation on Exercise of Remedies. The proceeds of any
such sale will be distributed pursuant to the provisions of the
Intercreditor Agreement. Any such proceeds so distributed to any
Trustee upon any such sale shall be deposited in the applicable
Special Payments Account and shall be distributed to the
Certificateholders of the applicable Trust on a Special
Distribution Date. (Sections 4.01 and 4.02) The market for
Equipment Notes at the time of the existence of an Indenture
Default may be very limited and there can be no assurance as to
the price at which they could be sold. If any such Equipment
Notes are sold for less than their outstanding principal amount,
certain Certificateholders will receive a smaller amount of
principal distributions under the relevant Indenture than
anticipated and will not have any claim for the shortfall
against Continental, any Liquidity Provider or any Trustee.
Any amount, other than Scheduled Payments received on a Regular
Distribution Date or within five days thereafter, distributed to
the Trustee of any Trust by the Subordination Agent on account
of any Equipment Note or Collateral under (and as defined in)
any Indenture held in such Trust following an Indenture Default
will be deposited in the Special Payments Account for such Trust
and will be distributed to the Certificateholders of such Trust
on a Special Distribution Date. (Sections 4.01 and 4.02;
Trust Supplements, Section 3.02) Any funds
representing payments received with respect to any defaulted
Equipment Notes, or the proceeds from the sale of any
S-32
Equipment Notes, held by the Trustee in the Special Payments
Account for such Trust will, to the extent practicable, be
invested and reinvested by such Trustee in certain permitted
investments pending the distribution of such funds on a Special
Distribution Date. (Section 4.04)
Each Pass Through Trust Agreement provides that the Trustee
of the related Trust will, within 90 days after the
occurrence of any default known to such Trustee, give to the
Certificateholders of such Trust notice, transmitted by mail, of
such uncured or unwaived default with respect to such Trust
known to it, provided that, except in the case of default
in a payment of principal, premium, if any, or interest on any
of the Equipment Notes held in such Trust, the applicable
Trustee will be protected in withholding such notice if it in
good faith determines that the withholding of such notice is in
the interests of such Certificateholders. (Section 7.02)
The term default as used in this paragraph only with
respect to any Trust means the occurrence of an Indenture
Default under any Indenture pursuant to which Equipment Notes
held by such Trust were issued, as described above, except that
in determining whether any such Indenture Default has occurred,
any grace period or notice in connection therewith will be
disregarded.
Each Pass Through Trust Agreement contains a provision
entitling the Trustee of the related Trust, subject to the duty
of such Trustee during a default to act with the required
standard of care, to be offered reasonable security or indemnity
by the holders of the Certificates of such Trust before
proceeding to exercise any right or power under such Pass
Through Trust Agreement or the Intercreditor Agreement at
the request of such Certificateholders. (Section 7.03(e))
Subject to certain qualifications set forth in each Pass Through
Trust Agreement and to the Intercreditor Agreement, the
Certificateholders of each Trust holding Certificates evidencing
fractional undivided interests aggregating not less than a
majority in interest in such Trust shall have the right to
direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding
for any remedy available to the Trustee with respect to such
Trust or pursuant to the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement,
or exercising any trust or power conferred on such Trustee under
such Pass Through Trust Agreement or the Intercreditor
Agreement, including any right of such Trustee as Controlling
Party under the Intercreditor Agreement or as holder of the
Equipment Notes. (Section 6.04)
In certain cases, the holders of the Certificates of a Trust
evidencing fractional undivided interests aggregating not less
than a majority in interest of such Trust may on behalf of the
holders of all the Certificates of such Trust waive any past
event of default under such Trust (i.e., any
Indenture Default under any Indenture pursuant to which
Equipment Notes held by such Trust were issued) and its
consequences or, if the Trustee of such Trust is the Controlling
Party, may direct such Trustee to instruct the applicable Loan
Trustee to waive any past Indenture Default and its
consequences, except (i) a default in the deposit of any
Scheduled Payment or Special Payment or in the distribution
thereof, (ii) a default in payment of the principal,
premium, if any, or interest with respect to any of the
Equipment Notes and (iii) a default in respect of any
covenant or provision of the Pass Through Trust Agreement
that cannot be modified or amended without the consent of each
Certificateholder of such Trust affected thereby.
(Section 6.05) Each Indenture will provide that, with
certain exceptions, the holders of the majority in aggregate
unpaid principal amount of the Equipment Notes issued thereunder
may on behalf of all such holders waive any past default or
Indenture Default thereunder. (Indentures, Section 5.06)
Notwithstanding such provisions of the Indentures, pursuant to
the Intercreditor Agreement only the Controlling Party will be
entitled to waive any such past default or Indenture Default.
See Description of the Intercreditor Agreement
Intercreditor Rights Controlling Party.
Purchase
Rights of Certificateholders
Upon the occurrence and during the continuation of a Certificate
Buyout Event, with 15 days written notice to the
Trustee and each Certificateholder of the same Class:
|
|
|
|
|
The Class B Certificateholders will have the right to
purchase all but not less than all of the Class A
Certificates on the third business day next following the expiry
of such
15-day
notice period.
|
|
|
|
If any Additional Junior Certificates are issued, the holders of
Additional Junior Certificates will have the right to purchase
all of the Class A and Class B Certificates and, if
Refinancing Certificates are issued, holders of such Refinancing
Certificates will have the same right to purchase Certificates
as the Class that they refinanced.
|
S-33
See Possible Issuance of Additional Junior Certificates
and Refinancing of Certificates. In each case, the
purchase price will be equal to the Pool Balance of the relevant
Class or Classes of Certificates plus accrued and unpaid
interest thereon to the date of purchase, without premium, but
including any other amounts then due and payable to the
Certificateholders of such Class or Classes. Such purchase right
may be exercised by any Certificateholder of the Class or
Classes entitled to such right. In each case, if prior to the
end of the
15-day
notice period, any other Certificateholder of the same Class
notifies the purchasing Certificateholder that the other
Certificateholder wants to participate in such purchase, then
such other Certificateholder may join with the purchasing
Certificateholder to purchase the Certificates pro rata based on
the interest in the Trust held by each Certificateholder. If
Continental or any of its affiliates is a Certificateholder or
holder of Additional Junior Certificates, it will not have the
purchase rights described above. (Trust Supplements,
Section 4.01)
A Certificate Buyout Event means that a Continental
Bankruptcy Event has occurred and is continuing and the
following events have occurred: (A) (i) the
60-day
period specified in Section 1110(a)(2)(A) of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the
60-Day
Period) has expired and (ii) Continental has not
entered into one or more agreements under
Section 1110(a)(2)(A) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to
perform all of its obligations under all of the Indentures or,
if it has entered into such agreements, has at any time
thereafter failed to cure any default under any of the
Indentures in accordance with Section 1110(a)(2)(B) of the
Bankruptcy Code; or (B) if prior to the expiry of the
60-Day
Period, Continental shall have abandoned any Aircraft.
PTC Event
of Default
A Pass Through Certificate Event of Default (a PTC Event
of Default) under each Pass Through Trust Agreement
means the failure to pay:
|
|
|
|
|
The outstanding Pool Balance of the applicable Class of
Certificates within ten Business Days of the Final Maturity Date
for such Class.
|
|
|
|
Interest due on such Class of Certificates within ten Business
Days of any Distribution Date (unless the Subordination Agent
shall have made Interest Drawings, or withdrawals from the Cash
Collateral Account for such Class of Certificates, with respect
thereto in an aggregate amount sufficient to pay such interest
and shall have distributed such amount to the Trustee entitled
thereto). (Section 1.01)
|
Any failure to make expected principal distributions with
respect to any Class of Certificates on any Regular Distribution
Date (other than the Final Maturity Date) will not constitute a
PTC Event of Default with respect to such Certificates. A PTC
Event of Default with respect to the most senior outstanding
Class of Certificates resulting from an Indenture Default under
all Indentures will constitute a Triggering Event.
Merger,
Consolidation and Transfer of Assets
Continental will be prohibited from consolidating with or
merging into any other corporation or transferring substantially
all of its assets as an entirety to any other corporation unless:
|
|
|
|
|
The surviving successor or transferee corporation shall be
validly existing under the laws of the United States or any
state thereof or the District of Columbia.
|
|
|
|
The surviving successor or transferee corporation shall be a
citizen of the United States (as defined in
Title 49 of the United States Code relating to aviation
(the Transportation Code)) holding an air carrier
operating certificate issued pursuant to Chapter 447 of
Title 49, United States Code, if, and so long as, such
status is a condition of entitlement to the benefits of
Section 1110 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
|
|
|
|
The surviving successor or transferee corporation shall
expressly assume all of the obligations of Continental contained
in the Basic Agreement and any Trust Supplement, the Note
Purchase Agreement, the Indentures, the Participation Agreements
and any other operative documents.
|
|
|
|
Continental shall have delivered a certificate and an opinion or
opinions of counsel indicating that such transaction, in effect,
complies with such conditions.
|
S-34
In addition, after giving effect to such transaction, no
Indenture Default shall have occurred and be continuing.
(Section 5.02; Indentures, Section 4.07)
The Basic Agreement, the Trust Supplements, the Note
Purchase Agreement, the Indentures and the Participation
Agreements will not contain any covenants or provisions that may
afford any Trustee or Certificateholder protection in the event
of a highly leveraged transaction, including transactions
effected by management or affiliates, which may or may not
result in a change in control of Continental.
Modifications
of the Pass Through Trust Agreements and Certain Other
Agreements
Each Pass Through Trust Agreement contains provisions
permitting, at the request of Continental, the execution of
amendments or supplements to such Pass Through
Trust Agreement or, if applicable, to the Deposit
Agreements, the Escrow Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement,
the Note Purchase Agreement or the Liquidity Facilities, without
the consent of the holders of any of the Certificates of the
related Trust:
|
|
|
|
|
To evidence the succession of another corporation to Continental
and the assumption by such corporation of Continentals
obligations under such Pass Through Trust Agreement or the
Note Purchase Agreement.
|
|
|
|
To add to the covenants of Continental for the benefit of
holders of such Certificates or to surrender any right or power
conferred upon Continental in such Pass Through Trust Agreement,
the Intercreditor Agreement, the Note Purchase Agreement or the
Liquidity Facilities.
|
|
|
|
To correct or supplement any provision of such Pass Through
Trust Agreement, the Deposit Agreements, the Escrow
Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement, the Note Purchase
Agreement or the Liquidity Facilities which may be defective or
inconsistent with any other provision in such Pass Through
Trust Agreement, the Deposit Agreements, the Escrow
Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement or the Liquidity
Facilities, as applicable, or to cure any ambiguity or to modify
any other provision with respect to matters or questions arising
under such Pass Through Trust Agreement, the Deposit
Agreements, the Escrow Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement,
the Note Purchase Agreement or the Liquidity Facilities,
provided that such action shall not materially adversely affect
the interests of the holders of such Certificates; to correct
any mistake in such Pass Through Trust Agreement, the
Deposit Agreements, the Escrow Agreements, the Intercreditor
Agreement or the Liquidity Facilities; or, as provided in the
Intercreditor Agreement, to give effect to or provide for a
Replacement Facility.
|
|
|
|
To comply with any requirement of the Commission, any applicable
law, rules or regulations of any exchange or quotation system on
which the Certificates are listed, or any regulatory body.
|
|
|
|
To modify, eliminate or add to the provisions of such Pass
Through Trust Agreement, the Deposit Agreements, the Escrow
Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement, the Note Purchase
Agreement or the Liquidity Facilities to such extent as shall be
necessary to continue the qualification of such Pass Through
Trust Agreement (including any supplemental agreement)
under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the
Trust Indenture Act), or any similar federal
statute enacted after the execution of such Pass Through
Trust Agreement, and to add to such Pass Through
Trust Agreement, the Deposit Agreements, the Escrow
Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement, the Note Purchase
Agreement or the Liquidity Facilities such other provisions as
may be expressly permitted by the Trust Indenture Act.
|
|
|
|
To evidence and provide for the acceptance of appointment under
such Pass Through Trust Agreement, the Deposit Agreements, the
Escrow Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement, the Note
Purchase Agreement or the Liquidity Facilities by a successor
Trustee and to add to or change any of the provisions of such
Pass Through Trust Agreement, the Deposit Agreements, the
Escrow Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement, the Note
Purchase Agreement or the Liquidity Facilities as shall be
necessary to provide for or facilitate the administration of the
Trusts under the Basic Agreement by more than one Trustee.
|
|
|
|
To provide for the issuance of Additional Junior Certificates or
Refinancing Certificates after the Delivery Period Termination
Date, subject to certain terms and conditions. See
Possible Issuance of Additional Junior Certificates and
Refinancing of Certificates.
|
S-35
In each case, such modification or supplement may not adversely
affect the status of the Trust as a grantor trust under Subpart
E, Part I of Subchapter J of Chapter 1 of Subtitle A
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
(Section 9.01; Trust Supplements, Section 6.02)
Each Pass Through Trust Agreement also contains provisions
permitting the execution, with the consent of the holders of the
Certificates of the related Trust evidencing fractional
undivided interests aggregating not less than a majority in
interest of such Trust, of amendments or supplements adding any
provisions to or changing or eliminating any of the provisions
of such Pass Through Trust Agreement, the Deposit
Agreements, the Escrow Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement,
the Note Purchase Agreement or the Liquidity Facilities to the
extent applicable to such Certificateholders or of modifying the
rights and obligations of such Certificateholders under such
Pass Through Trust Agreement, the Deposit Agreements, the
Escrow Agreements, the Intercreditor Agreement, the Note
Purchase Agreement or the Liquidity Facilities. No such
amendment or supplement may, without the consent of the holder
of each Certificate so affected thereby:
|
|
|
|
|
Reduce in any manner the amount of, or delay the timing of, any
receipt by the Trustee (or, with respect to the Deposits, the
Receiptholders) of payments with respect to the Equipment Notes
held in such Trust or distributions in respect of any
Certificate related to such Trust (or, with respect to the
Deposits, payments upon the Deposits), or change the date or
place of any payment in respect of any Certificate, or make
distributions payable in coin or currency other than that
provided for in such Certificates, or impair the right of any
Certificateholder of such Trust to institute suit for the
enforcement of any such payment when due.
|
|
|
|
Permit the disposition of any Equipment Note held in such Trust,
except as provided in such Pass Through Trust Agreement, or
otherwise deprive such Certificateholder of the benefit of the
ownership of the applicable Equipment Notes.
|
|
|
|
Alter the priority of distributions specified in the
Intercreditor Agreement in a manner materially adverse to such
Certificateholders.
|
|
|
|
Reduce the percentage of the aggregate fractional undivided
interests of the Trust provided for in such Pass Through
Trust Agreement, the consent of the holders of which is
required for any such supplemental trust agreement or for any
waiver provided for in such Pass Through Trust Agreement.
|
|
|
|
Modify any of the provisions relating to the rights of the
Certificateholders in respect of the waiver of events of default
or receipt of payment.
|
|
|
|
Adversely affect the status of any Trust as a grantor trust
under Subpart E, Part I of Subchapter J of Chapter 1
of Subtitle A of the Code for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. (Section 9.02; Trust Supplements,
Section 6.03)
|
In the event that a Trustee, as holder (or beneficial owner
through the Subordination Agent) of any Equipment Note in trust
for the benefit of the Certificateholders of the relevant Trust
or as Controlling Party under the Intercreditor Agreement,
receives (directly or indirectly through the Subordination
Agent) a request for a consent to any amendment, modification,
waiver or supplement under any Indenture, any Participation
Agreement, any Equipment Note or any other related document,
such Trustee shall forthwith send a notice of such proposed
amendment, modification, waiver or supplement to each
Certificateholder of the relevant Trust as of the date of such
notice, except in the case when consent of Certificateholders is
not required under the applicable Pass Through
Trust Agreement. Such Trustee shall request from the
Certificateholders a direction as to:
|
|
|
|
|
Whether or not to take or refrain from taking (or direct the
Subordination Agent to take or refrain from taking) any action
which a holder of such Equipment Note or the Controlling Party
has the option to direct.
|
|
|
|
Whether or not to give or execute (or direct the Subordination
Agent to give or execute) any waivers, consents, amendments,
modifications or supplements as a holder of such Equipment Note
or as Controlling Party.
|
|
|
|
How to vote (or direct the Subordination Agent to vote) any
Equipment Note if a vote has been called for with respect
thereto.
|
S-36
Provided such a request for Certificateholder direction shall
have been made, in directing any action or casting any vote or
giving any consent as the holder of any Equipment Note (or in
directing the Subordination Agent in any of the foregoing):
|
|
|
|
|
Other than as Controlling Party, such Trustee shall vote for or
give consent to any such action with respect to such Equipment
Note in the same proportion as that of (x) the aggregate
face amount of all Certificates actually voted in favor of or
for giving consent to such action by such direction of
Certificateholders to (y) the aggregate face amount of all
outstanding Certificates of the relevant Trust.
|
|
|
|
As the Controlling Party, such Trustee shall vote as directed in
such Certificateholder direction by the Certificateholders
evidencing fractional undivided interests aggregating not less
than a majority in interest in the relevant Trust.
|
For purposes of the immediately preceding paragraph, a
Certificate shall have been actually voted if the
Certificateholder has delivered to the applicable Trustee an
instrument evidencing such Certificateholders consent to
such direction prior to one Business Day before such Trustee
directs such action or casts such vote or gives such consent.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, but subject to certain rights of
the Certificateholders under the relevant Pass Through
Trust Agreement and subject to the Intercreditor Agreement,
a Trustee may, in its own discretion and at its own direction,
consent and notify the relevant Loan Trustee of such consent (or
direct the Subordination Agent to consent and notify the
relevant Loan Trustee of such consent) to any amendment,
modification, waiver or supplement under the relevant Indenture,
Participation Agreement, any relevant Equipment Note or any
other related document, if an Indenture Default under any
Indenture shall have occurred and be continuing, or if such
amendment, modification, waiver or supplement will not
materially adversely affect the interests of the
Certificateholders. (Section 10.01)
In determining whether the Certificateholders of the requisite
fractional undivided interests of Certificates of any Class have
given any direction under a Pass Through Trust Agreement,
Certificates owned by Continental or any of its affiliates will
be disregarded and deemed not to be outstanding for purposes of
any such determination. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
(i) if any such person owns 100% of the Certificates of any
Class, such Certificates shall not be so disregarded, and
(ii) if any amount of Certificates of any Class so owned by
any such person have been pledged in good faith, such
Certificates shall not be disregarded if the pledgee establishes
to the satisfaction of the applicable Trustee the pledgees
right so to act with respect to such Certificates and that the
pledgee is not Continental or an affiliate of Continental.
Obligation
to Purchase Equipment Notes
The Trustees will be obligated to purchase the Equipment Notes
issued with respect to the Aircraft during the Delivery Period,
subject to the terms and conditions of a note purchase agreement
(the Note Purchase Agreement). Under the Note
Purchase Agreement, Continental agrees to enter into a secured
debt financing with respect to each Aircraft. The Note Purchase
Agreement provides for the relevant parties to enter into a
participation agreement (each, a Participation
Agreement) and an indenture (each, an
Indenture) relating to the financing of each
Aircraft in substantially the form attached to the Note Purchase
Agreement.
The description of such financing agreements in this Prospectus
Supplement is based on the forms of such agreements attached to
the Note Purchase Agreement. However, the terms of the financing
agreements actually entered into may differ from the forms of
such agreements and, consequently, may differ from the
description of such agreements contained in this Prospectus
Supplement. See Description of the Equipment Notes.
Although such changes are permitted, under the Note Purchase
Agreement, the terms of such agreements must not vary the
Required Terms. In addition, Continental is obligated to certify
to the Trustees that any substantive modifications do not
materially and adversely affect the Certificateholders.
Continental must also obtain written confirmation from each
Rating Agency that the use of financing agreements modified in
any material respect from the forms attached to the Note
Purchase Agreement will not result in a withdrawal, suspension
or downgrading of the rating of any Class of Certificates.
Further, under the Note Purchase Agreement, it is a condition
precedent to the obligation of each Trustee to purchase the
Equipment Notes related to the financing of an Aircraft that no
Triggering Event shall have occurred and, in the case of certain
currently-owned Aircraft, that certain maintenance shall have
been performed on such Aircraft. See Description of the
Aircraft and the Appraisals Timing of Financing the
S-37
Aircraft. The Trustees will have no right or obligation to
purchase Equipment Notes after the Delivery Period Termination
Date.
The Required Terms, as defined in the Note Purchase
Agreement, mandate that:
|
|
|
|
|
The initial principal amount and principal amortization schedule
for each of the Equipment Notes issued with respect to each
Aircraft shall be as set forth in the applicable table below for
that Aircraft (or, in the case of any new Aircraft, the
applicable table for that model of new Aircraft):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing 737-824
|
|
|
|
N14235
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
15,570,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
3,447,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
15,570,000.00
|
|
|
|
3,447,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
14,930,311.90
|
|
|
|
3,228,921.43
|
|
|
|
639,688.10
|
|
|
|
218,078.57
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
14,539,316.25
|
|
|
|
3,024,508.75
|
|
|
|
390,995.65
|
|
|
|
204,412.68
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
14,079,059.31
|
|
|
|
2,818,921.65
|
|
|
|
460,256.94
|
|
|
|
205,587.10
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
13,619,422.24
|
|
|
|
2,614,774.19
|
|
|
|
459,637.07
|
|
|
|
204,147.46
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
13,160,540.41
|
|
|
|
2,410,159.83
|
|
|
|
458,881.83
|
|
|
|
204,614.36
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
12,702,463.83
|
|
|
|
2,205,955.34
|
|
|
|
458,076.58
|
|
|
|
204,204.49
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
12,245,247.07
|
|
|
|
2,000,643.89
|
|
|
|
457,216.76
|
|
|
|
205,311.45
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
11,788,322.64
|
|
|
|
1,795,905.10
|
|
|
|
456,924.43
|
|
|
|
204,738.79
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
11,331,131.28
|
|
|
|
1,593,410.38
|
|
|
|
457,191.36
|
|
|
|
202,494.72
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
10,768,243.18
|
|
|
|
1,380,681.82
|
|
|
|
562,888.10
|
|
|
|
212,728.56
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
10,207,333.52
|
|
|
|
1,173,286.12
|
|
|
|
560,909.66
|
|
|
|
207,395.70
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
9,649,012.44
|
|
|
|
971,457.56
|
|
|
|
558,321.08
|
|
|
|
201,828.56
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
9,197,360.75
|
|
|
|
774,729.96
|
|
|
|
451,651.69
|
|
|
|
196,727.60
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
8,747,788.47
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
449,572.28
|
|
|
|
774,729.96
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
8,300,459.88
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
447,328.59
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
7,855,557.06
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
444,902.82
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
7,413,282.34
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
442,274.72
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
6,973,861.18
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
439,421.16
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
6,973,861.18
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
S-38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N37253
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
15,185,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
3,362,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
15,185,000.00
|
|
|
|
3,362,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
14,587,731.51
|
|
|
|
3,154,832.88
|
|
|
|
597,268.49
|
|
|
|
207,167.12
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
14,219,649.72
|
|
|
|
2,958,010.83
|
|
|
|
368,081.79
|
|
|
|
196,822.05
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
13,783,645.99
|
|
|
|
2,759,773.73
|
|
|
|
436,003.73
|
|
|
|
198,237.10
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
13,347,981.95
|
|
|
|
2,562,660.74
|
|
|
|
435,664.04
|
|
|
|
197,112.99
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
12,912,772.67
|
|
|
|
2,364,784.81
|
|
|
|
435,209.28
|
|
|
|
197,875.93
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
12,478,048.29
|
|
|
|
2,166,982.53
|
|
|
|
434,724.38
|
|
|
|
197,802.28
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
12,043,841.65
|
|
|
|
1,967,738.02
|
|
|
|
434,206.64
|
|
|
|
199,244.51
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
11,609,571.08
|
|
|
|
1,768,673.00
|
|
|
|
434,270.57
|
|
|
|
199,065.02
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
11,174,657.45
|
|
|
|
1,571,406.66
|
|
|
|
434,913.63
|
|
|
|
197,266.34
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
10,735,272.58
|
|
|
|
1,376,454.40
|
|
|
|
439,384.87
|
|
|
|
194,952.26
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
10,294,386.32
|
|
|
|
1,183,292.44
|
|
|
|
440,886.26
|
|
|
|
193,161.96
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
9,760,190.61
|
|
|
|
982,650.93
|
|
|
|
534,195.71
|
|
|
|
200,641.51
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
9,333,213.12
|
|
|
|
786,173.34
|
|
|
|
426,977.49
|
|
|
|
196,477.59
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
8,907,944.09
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
425,269.03
|
|
|
|
786,173.34
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
8,484,518.49
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
423,425.60
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
8,063,085.93
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
421,432.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
7,643,812.63
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
419,273.30
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
7,226,883.84
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
416,928.79
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
7,226,883.84
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N76254
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
14,531,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
3,217,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
14,531,000.00
|
|
|
|
3,217,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
13,960,023.29
|
|
|
|
3,019,080.82
|
|
|
|
570,976.71
|
|
|
|
197,919.18
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
13,607,780.01
|
|
|
|
2,830,728.00
|
|
|
|
352,243.28
|
|
|
|
188,352.82
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
13,190,537.47
|
|
|
|
2,641,021.02
|
|
|
|
417,242.54
|
|
|
|
189,706.98
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
12,773,619.99
|
|
|
|
2,452,389.77
|
|
|
|
416,917.48
|
|
|
|
188,631.25
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
12,357,137.72
|
|
|
|
2,263,028.42
|
|
|
|
416,482.27
|
|
|
|
189,361.35
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
11,941,119.47
|
|
|
|
2,073,737.55
|
|
|
|
416,018.25
|
|
|
|
189,290.87
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
11,525,596.69
|
|
|
|
1,883,066.50
|
|
|
|
415,522.78
|
|
|
|
190,671.05
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
11,110,012.73
|
|
|
|
1,692,567.23
|
|
|
|
415,583.96
|
|
|
|
190,499.27
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
10,693,813.37
|
|
|
|
1,503,789.24
|
|
|
|
416,199.36
|
|
|
|
188,777.99
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
10,273,335.18
|
|
|
|
1,317,225.75
|
|
|
|
420,478.19
|
|
|
|
186,563.49
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
9,851,420.20
|
|
|
|
1,132,375.52
|
|
|
|
421,914.98
|
|
|
|
184,850.23
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
9,340,210.86
|
|
|
|
940,367.58
|
|
|
|
511,209.34
|
|
|
|
192,007.94
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
8,931,606.16
|
|
|
|
752,344.40
|
|
|
|
408,604.70
|
|
|
|
188,023.18
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
8,524,636.39
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
406,969.77
|
|
|
|
752,344.40
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
8,119,430.75
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
405,205.64
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
7,716,132.37
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
403,298.38
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
7,314,900.35
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
401,232.02
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
6,915,911.96
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
398,988.39
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
6,915,911.96
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
S-39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N76519/N77520/N79521/N76522/N76523/N78524/N77525/N76526/N87527
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
25,923,638.00
|
|
|
|
5,606,406.00
|
|
|
|
752,362.00
|
|
|
|
299,594.00
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
25,423,549.89
|
|
|
|
5,288,677.11
|
|
|
|
500,088.11
|
|
|
|
317,728.89
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
24,799,998.47
|
|
|
|
4,965,477.53
|
|
|
|
623,551.42
|
|
|
|
323,199.58
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
24,174,112.34
|
|
|
|
4,641,154.66
|
|
|
|
625,886.13
|
|
|
|
324,322.87
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
23,545,906.57
|
|
|
|
4,312,087.23
|
|
|
|
628,205.77
|
|
|
|
329,067.43
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
22,915,227.47
|
|
|
|
3,979,540.43
|
|
|
|
630,679.10
|
|
|
|
332,546.80
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
22,281,907.49
|
|
|
|
3,640,446.11
|
|
|
|
633,319.98
|
|
|
|
339,094.32
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
21,644,612.22
|
|
|
|
3,297,472.48
|
|
|
|
637,295.27
|
|
|
|
342,973.63
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
21,001,951.14
|
|
|
|
2,953,343.86
|
|
|
|
642,661.08
|
|
|
|
344,128.62
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
20,346,307.16
|
|
|
|
2,608,761.34
|
|
|
|
655,643.98
|
|
|
|
344,582.52
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
19,682,765.48
|
|
|
|
2,262,443.52
|
|
|
|
663,541.68
|
|
|
|
346,317.82
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
19,011,343.23
|
|
|
|
1,914,052.17
|
|
|
|
671,422.25
|
|
|
|
348,391.35
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
18,540,549.05
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
|
|
470,794.18
|
|
|
|
352,308.62
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
18,068,312.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
472,236.37
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
17,594,520.17
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
473,792.51
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
17,119,045.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
475,474.93
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
16,641,747.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
477,297.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
479,276.80
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing 757-224
|
|
|
|
N17139
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
12,436,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
2,753,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
12,436,000.00
|
|
|
|
2,753,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
11,925,263.00
|
|
|
|
2,579,031.00
|
|
|
|
510,737.00
|
|
|
|
173,969.00
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
11,612,963.70
|
|
|
|
2,415,760.80
|
|
|
|
312,299.30
|
|
|
|
163,270.20
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
11,245,343.44
|
|
|
|
2,251,552.56
|
|
|
|
367,620.26
|
|
|
|
164,208.24
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
10,878,218.30
|
|
|
|
2,088,494.20
|
|
|
|
367,125.14
|
|
|
|
163,058.36
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
10,511,696.38
|
|
|
|
1,925,062.92
|
|
|
|
366,521.92
|
|
|
|
163,431.28
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
10,145,817.64
|
|
|
|
1,761,959.01
|
|
|
|
365,878.74
|
|
|
|
163,103.91
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
9,780,625.66
|
|
|
|
1,597,970.94
|
|
|
|
365,191.98
|
|
|
|
163,988.07
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
9,415,667.18
|
|
|
|
1,434,440.27
|
|
|
|
364,958.48
|
|
|
|
163,530.67
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
9,050,495.50
|
|
|
|
1,272,702.00
|
|
|
|
365,171.68
|
|
|
|
161,738.27
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
8,600,900.82
|
|
|
|
1,102,789.68
|
|
|
|
449,594.68
|
|
|
|
169,912.32
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
8,152,886.39
|
|
|
|
937,136.86
|
|
|
|
448,014.43
|
|
|
|
165,652.82
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
7,706,939.53
|
|
|
|
775,930.67
|
|
|
|
445,946.86
|
|
|
|
161,206.19
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
7,346,192.54
|
|
|
|
618,798.76
|
|
|
|
360,746.99
|
|
|
|
157,131.91
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
6,987,106.42
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
359,086.12
|
|
|
|
618,798.76
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
6,629,812.40
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
357,294.02
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
6,274,455.92
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
355,356.48
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
5,921,198.57
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
353,257.35
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
5,570,220.45
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
350,978.12
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
5,570,220.45
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
S-40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N41140
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
12,742,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
2,821,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
12,742,000.00
|
|
|
|
2,821,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
12,230,168.83
|
|
|
|
2,644,971.82
|
|
|
|
511,831.17
|
|
|
|
176,028.18
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
11,915,857.17
|
|
|
|
2,478,769.54
|
|
|
|
314,311.66
|
|
|
|
166,202.28
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
11,544,703.07
|
|
|
|
2,311,490.61
|
|
|
|
371,154.10
|
|
|
|
167,278.93
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
11,173,942.81
|
|
|
|
2,145,269.95
|
|
|
|
370,760.26
|
|
|
|
166,220.66
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
10,803,679.91
|
|
|
|
1,978,535.42
|
|
|
|
370,262.90
|
|
|
|
166,734.53
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
10,433,947.31
|
|
|
|
1,811,996.64
|
|
|
|
369,732.60
|
|
|
|
166,538.78
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
10,064,780.95
|
|
|
|
1,644,396.59
|
|
|
|
369,166.36
|
|
|
|
167,600.05
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
9,695,704.31
|
|
|
|
1,477,102.84
|
|
|
|
369,076.64
|
|
|
|
167,293.75
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
9,326,245.27
|
|
|
|
1,311,478.59
|
|
|
|
369,459.04
|
|
|
|
165,624.25
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
8,953,224.56
|
|
|
|
1,147,963.90
|
|
|
|
373,020.71
|
|
|
|
163,514.69
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
8,498,960.33
|
|
|
|
976,916.47
|
|
|
|
454,264.23
|
|
|
|
171,047.43
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
8,046,458.31
|
|
|
|
810,113.25
|
|
|
|
452,502.02
|
|
|
|
166,803.22
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
7,682,618.13
|
|
|
|
647,137.22
|
|
|
|
363,840.18
|
|
|
|
162,976.03
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
7,320,342.82
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
362,275.31
|
|
|
|
647,137.22
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
6,959,756.03
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
360,586.79
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
6,600,994.78
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
358,761.25
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
6,244,211.34
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
356,783.44
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
5,889,575.38
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
354,635.96
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
5,889,575.38
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N19141
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
13,775,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
3,050,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
13,775,000.00
|
|
|
|
3,050,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
13,221,850.84
|
|
|
|
2,859,439.09
|
|
|
|
553,149.16
|
|
|
|
190,560.91
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
12,882,053.25
|
|
|
|
2,679,760.32
|
|
|
|
339,797.59
|
|
|
|
179,678.77
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
12,480,804.15
|
|
|
|
2,498,917.59
|
|
|
|
401,249.10
|
|
|
|
180,842.73
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
12,079,980.83
|
|
|
|
2,319,218.94
|
|
|
|
400,823.32
|
|
|
|
179,698.65
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
11,679,695.20
|
|
|
|
2,138,964.76
|
|
|
|
400,285.63
|
|
|
|
180,254.18
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
11,279,982.87
|
|
|
|
1,958,922.20
|
|
|
|
399,712.33
|
|
|
|
180,042.56
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
10,880,882.70
|
|
|
|
1,777,732.32
|
|
|
|
399,100.17
|
|
|
|
181,189.88
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
10,481,879.52
|
|
|
|
1,596,873.57
|
|
|
|
399,003.18
|
|
|
|
180,858.75
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
10,082,462.93
|
|
|
|
1,417,819.70
|
|
|
|
399,416.59
|
|
|
|
179,053.87
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
9,679,195.87
|
|
|
|
1,241,046.44
|
|
|
|
403,267.06
|
|
|
|
176,773.26
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
9,188,097.67
|
|
|
|
1,056,129.64
|
|
|
|
491,098.20
|
|
|
|
184,916.80
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
8,698,904.56
|
|
|
|
875,801.20
|
|
|
|
489,193.11
|
|
|
|
180,328.44
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
8,305,562.44
|
|
|
|
699,610.27
|
|
|
|
393,342.12
|
|
|
|
176,190.93
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
7,913,912.08
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
391,650.36
|
|
|
|
699,610.27
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
7,524,087.14
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
389,824.94
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
7,136,235.78
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
387,851.36
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
6,750,522.58
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
385,713.20
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
6,367,131.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
383,391.58
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
6,367,131.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
S-41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing 767-424ER
|
|
|
|
N67052
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
24,093,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,334,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
24,093,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,334,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
23,145,659.82
|
|
|
|
5,005,623.29
|
|
|
|
947,340.18
|
|
|
|
328,376.71
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
22,561,641.95
|
|
|
|
4,693,335.11
|
|
|
|
584,017.87
|
|
|
|
312,288.18
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
21,869,855.57
|
|
|
|
4,378,801.73
|
|
|
|
691,786.38
|
|
|
|
314,533.38
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
21,178,608.15
|
|
|
|
4,066,051.92
|
|
|
|
691,247.42
|
|
|
|
312,749.81
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
20,488,082.29
|
|
|
|
3,752,091.59
|
|
|
|
690,525.86
|
|
|
|
313,960.33
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
19,798,325.79
|
|
|
|
3,438,248.12
|
|
|
|
689,756.50
|
|
|
|
313,843.47
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
19,109,390.77
|
|
|
|
3,122,116.33
|
|
|
|
688,935.02
|
|
|
|
316,131.79
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
18,420,354.31
|
|
|
|
2,806,269.33
|
|
|
|
689,036.46
|
|
|
|
315,847.00
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
17,730,297.53
|
|
|
|
2,493,276.22
|
|
|
|
690,056.78
|
|
|
|
312,993.11
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
17,033,146.46
|
|
|
|
2,183,954.74
|
|
|
|
697,151.07
|
|
|
|
309,321.48
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
16,333,613.20
|
|
|
|
1,877,473.85
|
|
|
|
699,533.26
|
|
|
|
306,480.89
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
15,486,030.26
|
|
|
|
1,559,125.49
|
|
|
|
847,582.94
|
|
|
|
318,348.36
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
14,808,565.39
|
|
|
|
1,247,383.85
|
|
|
|
677,464.87
|
|
|
|
311,741.64
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
14,133,811.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
674,754.15
|
|
|
|
1,247,383.85
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
13,461,981.98
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
671,829.26
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
12,793,314.97
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
668,667.01
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
12,128,073.97
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
665,241.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
11,466,552.90
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
661,521.07
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
11,466,552.90
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing 777-224ER
|
|
|
|
N79011
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
38,588,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
8,543,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
38,588,000.00
|
|
|
|
8,543,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
36,966,727.45
|
|
|
|
7,994,652.70
|
|
|
|
1,621,272.55
|
|
|
|
548,347.30
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
35,979,761.89
|
|
|
|
7,484,609.50
|
|
|
|
986,965.56
|
|
|
|
510,043.20
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
34,821,647.06
|
|
|
|
6,972,020.83
|
|
|
|
1,158,114.83
|
|
|
|
512,588.67
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
33,665,427.20
|
|
|
|
6,463,379.17
|
|
|
|
1,156,219.86
|
|
|
|
508,641.66
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
32,511,460.63
|
|
|
|
5,953,996.87
|
|
|
|
1,153,966.57
|
|
|
|
509,382.30
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
31,359,896.63
|
|
|
|
5,446,071.90
|
|
|
|
1,151,564.00
|
|
|
|
507,924.97
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
30,210,897.96
|
|
|
|
4,935,894.55
|
|
|
|
1,148,998.67
|
|
|
|
510,177.35
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
29,063,096.43
|
|
|
|
4,427,649.70
|
|
|
|
1,147,801.53
|
|
|
|
508,244.85
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
27,654,262.38
|
|
|
|
3,888,807.54
|
|
|
|
1,408,834.05
|
|
|
|
538,842.16
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
26,243,079.05
|
|
|
|
3,364,833.21
|
|
|
|
1,411,183.33
|
|
|
|
523,974.33
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
24,837,840.67
|
|
|
|
2,854,995.75
|
|
|
|
1,405,238.38
|
|
|
|
509,837.46
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
23,440,143.80
|
|
|
|
2,359,941.51
|
|
|
|
1,397,696.87
|
|
|
|
495,054.24
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
22,302,497.78
|
|
|
|
1,878,627.33
|
|
|
|
1,137,646.02
|
|
|
|
481,314.18
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
21,170,437.94
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,132,059.84
|
|
|
|
1,878,627.33
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
20,044,405.66
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,126,032.28
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
18,924,890.07
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,119,515.59
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
17,812,434.71
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,112,455.36
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
16,707,645.28
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,104,789.43
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
16,707,645.28
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
S-42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N76021
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
70,254,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
15,553,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
70,254,000.00
|
|
|
|
15,553,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
69,328,338.50
|
|
|
|
14,993,374.50
|
|
|
|
925,661.50
|
|
|
|
559,625.50
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
68,007,201.09
|
|
|
|
14,147,045.91
|
|
|
|
1,321,137.41
|
|
|
|
846,328.59
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
66,355,590.72
|
|
|
|
13,285,774.78
|
|
|
|
1,651,610.37
|
|
|
|
861,271.13
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
64,697,426.31
|
|
|
|
12,421,170.09
|
|
|
|
1,658,164.41
|
|
|
|
864,604.69
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
63,032,728.16
|
|
|
|
11,543,519.09
|
|
|
|
1,664,698.15
|
|
|
|
877,651.00
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
61,361,063.39
|
|
|
|
10,656,181.91
|
|
|
|
1,671,664.77
|
|
|
|
887,337.18
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
59,681,960.06
|
|
|
|
9,750,913.79
|
|
|
|
1,679,103.33
|
|
|
|
905,268.12
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
57,991,817.73
|
|
|
|
8,834,827.87
|
|
|
|
1,690,142.33
|
|
|
|
916,085.92
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
56,286,879.60
|
|
|
|
7,915,193.65
|
|
|
|
1,704,938.13
|
|
|
|
919,634.22
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
54,546,689.07
|
|
|
|
6,993,863.43
|
|
|
|
1,740,190.53
|
|
|
|
921,330.22
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
52,784,825.30
|
|
|
|
6,067,373.32
|
|
|
|
1,761,863.77
|
|
|
|
926,490.11
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
51,001,285.45
|
|
|
|
5,134,782.95
|
|
|
|
1,783,539.85
|
|
|
|
932,590.37
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
49,755,572.49
|
|
|
|
4,191,108.06
|
|
|
|
1,245,712.96
|
|
|
|
943,674.89
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
48,505,762.28
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,249,810.21
|
|
|
|
4,191,108.06
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
47,251,531.07
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,254,231.21
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
45,992,520.10
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,259,010.97
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
44,728,330.70
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,264,189.40
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
43,458,518.61
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,269,812.09
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
43,458,518.61
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N77022
|
|
|
|
Equipment Note Ending Balance
|
|
|
Scheduled Payments of Principal
|
|
Date
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Note
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
70,367,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
15,578,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
70,367,000.00
|
|
|
|
15,578,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
69,440,244.35
|
|
|
|
15,017,575.95
|
|
|
|
926,755.65
|
|
|
|
560,424.05
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
68,116,974.43
|
|
|
|
14,169,881.27
|
|
|
|
1,323,269.92
|
|
|
|
847,694.68
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
66,462,698.13
|
|
|
|
13,307,219.92
|
|
|
|
1,654,276.30
|
|
|
|
862,661.35
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
64,801,857.20
|
|
|
|
12,441,219.64
|
|
|
|
1,660,840.93
|
|
|
|
866,000.28
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
63,134,471.99
|
|
|
|
11,562,151.98
|
|
|
|
1,667,385.21
|
|
|
|
879,067.66
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
61,460,108.92
|
|
|
|
10,673,382.51
|
|
|
|
1,674,363.07
|
|
|
|
888,769.47
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
59,778,295.27
|
|
|
|
9,766,653.16
|
|
|
|
1,681,813.65
|
|
|
|
906,729.35
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
58,085,424.82
|
|
|
|
8,849,088.54
|
|
|
|
1,692,870.45
|
|
|
|
917,564.62
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
56,377,734.67
|
|
|
|
7,927,969.90
|
|
|
|
1,707,690.15
|
|
|
|
921,118.64
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
54,634,735.23
|
|
|
|
7,005,152.52
|
|
|
|
1,742,999.44
|
|
|
|
922,817.38
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
52,870,027.56
|
|
|
|
6,077,166.93
|
|
|
|
1,764,707.67
|
|
|
|
927,985.59
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
51,083,608.81
|
|
|
|
5,143,071.23
|
|
|
|
1,786,418.75
|
|
|
|
934,095.70
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
49,835,885.10
|
|
|
|
4,197,873.10
|
|
|
|
1,247,723.71
|
|
|
|
945,198.13
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
48,584,057.52
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,251,827.58
|
|
|
|
4,197,873.10
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
47,327,801.80
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,256,255.72
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
46,066,758.60
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,261,043.20
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
44,800,528.62
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,266,229.98
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
43,528,666.87
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1,271,861.75
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
43,528,666.87
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest rate applicable to each Series of Equipment Notes
must be equal to the rate applicable to the Certificates issued
by the corresponding Trust.
|
|
|
|
The payment dates for the Equipment Notes must be May 10 and
November 10.
|
S-43
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts payable under the all-risk aircraft hull insurance
maintained with respect to each Aircraft must be sufficient to
pay the unpaid principal amount of the related Equipment Notes
together with six months of interest accrued thereon, subject to
certain rights of self-insurance.
|
|
|
|
(a) The past due rate in the Indentures, (b) the
Make-Whole Premium payable under the Indentures, (c) the
provisions relating to the redemption of Equipment Notes in the
Indentures and (d) the indemnification of the Loan
Trustees, Subordination Agent, Liquidity Providers, Trustees,
Escrow Agents and registered holders of the Equipment Notes (in
such capacity, the Note Holders) with respect to
certain taxes and expenses, in each case shall be provided as
set forth in the form of Participation Agreement attached as an
exhibit to the Note Purchase Agreement.
|
|
|
|
In the case of the Indentures, modifications are prohibited
(i) to the Granting Clause of the Indentures so as to
deprive the Note Holders under all the Indentures of a first
priority security interest in the Aircraft and certain of
Continentals rights under warranties with respect to the
Aircraft or to eliminate the obligations intended to be secured
thereby, (ii) to certain provisions relating to the
issuance, redemption, payments, and ranking of the Equipment
Notes (including the obligation to pay the Make-Whole Premium in
certain circumstances), (iii) to certain provisions
regarding Indenture Defaults (including cross-defaults among
Indentures) and remedies relating thereto, (iv) to certain
provisions relating to any replaced airframe or engines with
respect to an Aircraft and (v) to the provision that New
York law will govern the Indentures.
|
|
|
|
In the case of the Participation Agreements, modifications are
prohibited (i) to certain conditions to the obligations of
the Trustees to purchase the Equipment Notes issued with respect
to an Aircraft involving good title to such Aircraft, the
release of any recorded liens on the Aircraft, obtaining a
certificate of airworthiness with respect to such Aircraft,
entitlement to the benefits of Section 1110 with respect to
such Aircraft and filings of certain documents with the FAA and
the registration of certain interests with the International
Registry under the Cape Town Treaty, (ii) to the provisions
restricting the Note Holders ability to transfer such
Equipment Notes, (iii) to certain provisions requiring the
delivery of legal opinions and (iv) to the provision that
New York law will govern the Participation Agreement.
|
|
|
|
In the case of all of the Participation Agreements and
Indentures, modifications are prohibited in any material adverse
respect as regards the interest of the Note Holders, the
Subordination Agent, the Liquidity Provider or the Loan Trustee
in the definition of Make-Whole Premium.
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any such forms of financing
agreements may be modified to correct or supplement any such
provision which may be defective or to cure any ambiguity or
correct any mistake, provided that any such action shall not
materially adversely affect the interests of the Note Holders,
the Subordination Agent, the Liquidity Provider, the Loan
Trustee or the Certificateholders.
Liquidation
of Original Trusts
On the earlier of (i) the first Business Day after
August 31, 2010 and (ii) the fifth Business Day after
the occurrence of a Triggering Event (such Business Day, the
Transfer Date), each of the Trusts established on
the Issuance Date (the Original Trusts) will
transfer and assign all of its assets and rights to a newly
created successor trust (each a Successor Trust)
with substantially identical terms, except that (i) the
Successor Trusts will not have the right to purchase new
Equipment Notes and (ii) Delaware law will govern the
Original Trusts and New York law will govern the Successor
Trusts. The institution acting as Trustee of each of the
Original Trusts (each, an Original Trustee) will
also act as Trustee of the corresponding Successor Trust (each,
a New Trustee). Each New Trustee will assume the
obligations of the related Original Trustee under each
transaction document to which such Original Trustee was a party.
Upon the effectiveness of such transfer, assignment and
assumption, each of the Original Trusts will be liquidated and
each of the Certificates will represent the same percentage
interest in the Successor Trust as it represented in the
Original Trust immediately prior to such transfer, assignment
and assumption. Unless the context otherwise requires, all
references in this Prospectus Supplement to the Trusts, the
applicable Trustees, the Pass Through Trust Agreements and
similar terms shall apply to the Original Trusts until the
effectiveness of such transfer, assignment and assumption, and
thereafter shall be applicable with respect to the Successor
Trusts. If for any reason such transfer, assignment and
assumption cannot be effected to any Successor Trust, the
related Original Trust will continue in existence until it is
effected. The Original Trusts may be treated as partnerships for
S-44
U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Successor Trusts
will, in the opinion of Tax Counsel, be treated as grantor
trusts. See Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences.
Termination
of the Trusts
The obligations of Continental and the applicable Trustee with
respect to a Trust will terminate upon the distribution to
Certificateholders of such Trust of all amounts required to be
distributed to them pursuant to the applicable Pass Through
Trust Agreement and the disposition of all property held in
such Trust. The applicable Trustee will send to each
Certificateholder of such Trust notice of the termination of
such Trust, the amount of the proposed final payment and the
proposed date for the distribution of such final payment for
such Trust. The final distribution to any Certificateholder of
such Trust will be made only upon surrender of such
Certificateholders Certificates at the office or agency of
the applicable Trustee specified in such notice of termination.
(Trust Supplements, Section 7.01)
The
Trustees
The Trustee for each Trust will be Wilmington
Trust Company. The Trustees address is Wilmington
Trust Company, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington,
Delaware
19890-0001,
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.
Book-Entry;
Delivery and Form
General
Upon issuance, each Class of Certificates will be represented by
one or more fully registered global certificates. Each global
certificate will be deposited with, or on behalf of, The
Depository Trust Company (DTC) and registered
in the name of Cede & Co. (Cede), the
nominee of DTC. DTC was created to hold securities for its
participants (DTC Participants) and facilitate the
clearance and settlement of securities transactions between DTC
Participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts
of the DTC Participants, thereby eliminating the need for
physical movement of certificates. DTC Participants include
securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and
clearing corporations and certain other organizations. Indirect
access to the DTC system is available to others such as banks,
brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or
maintain a custodial relationship with a participant, either
directly or indirectly (Indirect DTC Participants).
Interests in a global certificate may also be held through the
Euroclear System and Clearstream, Luxembourg.
So long as such book-entry procedures are applicable, no person
acquiring an interest in such Certificates (Certificate
Owner) will be entitled to receive a certificate
representing such persons interest in such Certificates.
Unless and until definitive Certificates are issued under the
limited circumstances described below under
Physical Certificates, all references to
actions by Certificateholders shall refer to actions taken by
DTC upon instructions from DTC Participants, and all references
herein to distributions, notices, reports and statements to
Certificateholders shall refer, as the case may be, to
distributions, notices, reports and statements to DTC or Cede,
as the registered holder of such Certificates, or to DTC
Participants for distribution to Certificate Owners in
accordance with DTC procedures.
DTC is a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws
of the State of New York, a member of the Federal Reserve
System, a clearing corporation within the meaning of
the New York Uniform Commercial Code and clearing
agency registered pursuant to Section 17A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Under the New York Uniform Commercial Code, a clearing
corporation is defined as:
|
|
|
|
|
a person that is registered as a clearing agency
under the federal securities laws;
|
|
|
|
a federal reserve bank; or
|
|
|
|
any other person that provides clearance or settlement services
with respect to financial assets that would require it to
register as a clearing agency under the federal securities laws
but for an exclusion or exemption from the registration
requirement, if its activities as a clearing corporation,
including promulgation of rules, are subject to regulation by a
federal or state governmental authority.
|
S-45
A clearing agency is an organization established for
the execution of trades by transferring funds, assigning
deliveries and guaranteeing the performance of the obligations
of parties to trades.
Under the rules, regulations and procedures creating and
affecting DTC and its operations, DTC is required to make
book-entry transfers of the Certificates among DTC Participants
on whose behalf it acts with respect to the Certificates and to
receive and transmit distributions of principal, premium, if
any, and interest with respect to the Certificates. DTC
Participants and Indirect DTC Participants with which
Certificate Owners have accounts similarly are required to make
book-entry transfers and receive and transmit the payments on
behalf of their respective customers. Certificate Owners that
are not DTC Participants or Indirect DTC Participants but desire
to purchase, sell or otherwise transfer ownership of, or other
interests in, the Certificates may do so only through DTC
Participants and Indirect DTC Participants. In addition,
Certificate Owners will receive all distributions of principal,
premium, if any, and interest from the Trustees through DTC
Participants or Indirect DTC Participants, as the case may be.
Under a book-entry format, Certificate Owners may experience
some delay in their receipt of payments, because payments with
respect to the Certificates will be forwarded by the Trustees to
Cede, as nominee for DTC. DTC will forward payments in
same-day
funds to each DTC Participant who is credited with ownership of
the Certificates in an amount proportionate to the principal
amount of that DTC Participants holdings of beneficial
interests in the Certificates, as shown on the records of DTC or
its nominee. Each such DTC Participant will forward payments to
its Indirect DTC Participants in accordance with standing
instructions and customary industry practices. DTC Participants
and Indirect DTC Participants will be responsible for forwarding
distributions to Certificate Owners for whom they act.
Accordingly, although Certificate Owners will not possess
physical Certificates, DTCs rules provide a mechanism by
which Certificate Owners will receive payments on the
Certificates and will be able to transfer their interests.
Unless and until physical Certificates are issued under the
limited circumstances described under Physical
Certificates below, the only physical Certificateholder
will be Cede, as nominee of DTC. Certificate Owners will not be
recognized by the Trustees as registered owners of Certificates
under the applicable Pass Through Trust Agreement.
Certificate Owners will be permitted to exercise their rights
under the applicable Pass Through Trust Agreement only
indirectly through DTC. DTC will take any action permitted to be
taken by a Certificateholder under the applicable Pass Through
Trust Agreement only at the direction of one or more DTC
Participants to whose accounts with DTC the Certificates are
credited. In the event any action requires approval by
Certificateholders of a certain percentage of the beneficial
interests in a Trust, DTC will take action only at the direction
of and on behalf of DTC Participants whose holdings include
undivided interests that satisfy the required percentage. DTC
may take conflicting actions with respect to other undivided
interests to the extent that the actions are taken on behalf of
DTC Participants whose holdings include those undivided
interests. DTC will convey notices and other communications to
DTC Participants, and DTC Participants will convey notices and
other communications to Indirect DTC Participants in accordance
with arrangements among them. Arrangements among DTC and its
direct and indirect participants are subject to any statutory or
regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
DTCs rules applicable to itself and DTC Participants are
on file with the Commission.
A Certificate Owners ability to pledge its Certificates to
persons or entities that do not participate in the DTC system,
or otherwise to act with respect to its Certificates, may be
limited due to the lack of a physical Certificate to evidence
ownership of the Certificates, and because DTC can only act on
behalf of DTC Participants, who in turn act on behalf of
Indirect DTC Participants.
Neither Continental nor the Trustees will have any liability for
any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on
account of beneficial ownership interests in the Certificates
held by Cede, as nominee for DTC, for maintaining, supervising
or reviewing any records relating to the beneficial ownership
interests or for the performance by DTC, any DTC Participant or
any Indirect DTC Participant of their respective obligations
under the rules and procedures governing their obligations.
As long as the Certificates of any Trust are registered in the
name of DTC or its nominee, Continental will make all payments
to the Loan Trustee under the applicable Indenture in
immediately available funds. The applicable Trustee will pass
through to DTC in immediately available funds all payments
received from Continental, including the final distribution of
principal with respect to the Certificates of such Trust.
S-46
Any Certificates registered in the name of DTC or its nominee
will trade in DTCs
Same-Day
Funds Settlement System until maturity. DTC will require
secondary market trading activity in the Certificates to settle
in immediately available funds. No assurance can be given as to
the effect, if any, of settlement in
same-day
funds on trading activity in the Certificates.
Physical
Certificates
Physical Certificates will be issued in paper form to
Certificateholders or their nominees, rather than to DTC or its
nominee, only if:
|
|
|
|
|
Continental advises the applicable Trustee in writing that DTC
is no longer willing or able to discharge properly its
responsibilities as depository with respect to the Certificates
and Continental is unable to locate a qualified successor;
|
|
|
|
Continental elects to terminate the book-entry system through
DTC; or
|
|
|
|
after the occurrence of a PTC Event of Default, Certificate
Owners owning at least a majority in interest in a Trust advise
the applicable Trustee, Continental and DTC through DTC
Participants that the continuation of a book-entry system
through DTC or a successor to DTC is no longer in the
Certificate Owners best interest.
|
Upon the occurrence of any of the events described in the three
subparagraphs above, the applicable Trustee will notify all
applicable Certificate Owners through DTC Participants of the
availability of physical Certificates. Upon surrender by DTC of
the global Certificates and receipt of instructions for
re-registration, the applicable Trustee will reissue the
Certificates as physical Certificates to the applicable
Certificate Owners.
In the case of the physical Certificates that are issued, the
applicable Trustee or a paying agent will make distributions of
principal, premium, if any, and interest with respect to such
Certificates directly to holders in whose names the physical
Certificates were registered at the close of business on the
applicable record date. Except for the final payment to be made
with respect to a Certificate, the applicable Trustee or a
paying agent will make distributions by check mailed to the
addresses of the registered holders as they appear on the
register maintained by such Trustee. The applicable Trustee or a
paying agent will make the final payment with respect to any
Certificate only upon presentation and surrender of the
applicable Certificate at the office or agency specified in the
notice of final distribution to Certificateholders.
Physical Certificates will be freely transferable and
exchangeable at the office of the Trustee upon compliance with
the requirements set forth in the applicable Pass Through
Trust Agreement. Neither the Trustee nor any transfer or
exchange agent will impose a service charge for any registration
of transfer or exchange. However, the Trustee or transfer or
exchange agent will require payment of a sum sufficient to cover
any tax or other governmental charge attributable to a transfer
or exchange.
S-47
DESCRIPTION
OF THE DEPOSIT AGREEMENTS
The following summary describes the material terms of the
Deposit Agreements. The summary does not purport to be complete
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to all of the
provisions of the Deposit Agreements, each of which will be
filed as an exhibit to a Current Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission. The provisions
of the Deposit Agreements are substantially identical except as
otherwise indicated.
General
Under the Escrow Agreements, the Escrow Agent with respect to
each Trust will enter into a separate Deposit Agreement with the
Depositary. Pursuant to the Escrow Agreements, the Depositary
will establish separate accounts into which the proceeds of the
Offering attributable to Certificates of the applicable Trust
will be deposited (each, a Deposit) on behalf of
such Escrow Agent. Pursuant to the Deposit Agreement with
respect to each Trust (each a Deposit Agreement), on
each Regular Distribution Date the Depositary will pay to the
Paying Agent on behalf of the applicable Escrow Agent, for
distribution to the Certificateholders of such Trust, an amount
equal to interest accrued on the Deposits relating to such Trust
during the relevant interest period at a rate per annum equal to
the interest rate applicable to the Certificates issued by such
Trust. After the Issuance Date, upon each financing of an
Aircraft during the Delivery Period, the Trustee for each Trust
will request the Escrow Agent relating to such Trust to withdraw
from the Deposits relating to such Trust funds sufficient to
enable the Trustee of such Trust to purchase the Equipment Note
of the series applicable to such Trust issued with respect to
such Aircraft. Accrued but unpaid interest on all such Deposits
withdrawn will be paid on the next Regular Distribution Date.
Any portion of any Deposit withdrawn that is not used to
purchase such Equipment Note will be re-deposited by each
Trustee into an account relating to the applicable Trust. The
Deposits relating to each Trust and interest paid thereon will
not be subject to the subordination provisions of the
Intercreditor Agreement and will not be available to pay any
other amount in respect of the Certificates.
Unused
Deposits
The Trustees obligations to purchase the Equipment Notes
issued with respect to each Aircraft are subject to satisfaction
of certain conditions at the time of financing, as set forth in
the Note Purchase Agreement. See Description of the
Certificates Obligation to Purchase Equipment
Notes. Since the Aircraft are expected to be financed from
time to time during the Delivery Period, no assurance can be
given that all such conditions will be satisfied at the time of
financing for each such Aircraft. Moreover, delivery of the new
Aircraft is subject to delays in the manufacturing process and
to the Aircraft manufacturers right to postpone deliveries
under its agreement with Continental. See Description of
the Aircraft and Appraisals Timing of Financing the
Aircraft.
If any funds remain as Deposits with respect to any Trust at the
end of the Delivery Period or, if earlier, upon the acquisition
by the Trusts of the Equipment Notes with respect to all of the
Aircraft (the Delivery Period Termination Date),
such funds will be withdrawn by the Escrow Agent and
distributed, with accrued and unpaid interest thereon but
without premium, to the Certificateholders of such Trust after
at least 15 days prior written notice.
Distribution
Upon Occurrence of Triggering Event
If a Triggering Event shall occur prior to the Delivery Period
Termination Date, the Escrow Agent for each Trust will withdraw
any funds then held as Deposits with respect to such Trust and
cause such funds, with accrued and unpaid interest thereon but
without any premium, to be distributed to the Certificateholders
of such Trust by the Paying Agent on behalf of the Escrow Agent,
after at least 15 days prior written notice.
Accordingly, if a Triggering Event occurs prior to the Delivery
Period Termination Date, the Trusts will not acquire Equipment
Notes issued with respect to Aircraft available to be financed
after the occurrence of such Triggering Event.
Replacement
of Depositary
If the Depositarys short-term unsecured debt rating or
short-term issuer credit rating issued by either Rating Agency
falls below the Depositary Threshold Rating, then Continental
must, within 30 days of such event occurring, replace the
Depositary with a new depositary bank that has a short-term
unsecured debt rating or short-
S-48
term issuer credit rating issued by each Rating Agency equal to
or higher than the Depositary Threshold Rating, subject to
receipt of written confirmation from each Rating Agency that
such replacement will not result in a withdrawal, suspension or
downgrading of the ratings for any Class of Certificates then
rated by such Rating Agency without regard to any downgrading of
any rating of the Depositary being replaced.
At any time during the Delivery Period, Continental may replace
the Depositary, or the Depositary may replace itself, with a new
depositary bank that has a short-term unsecured debt rating or
short-term issuer credit rating issued by each Rating Agency
equal to or higher than the Depositary Threshold Rating, subject
to receipt of written confirmation from each Rating Agency that
such replacement will not result in a withdrawal, suspension or
downgrading of the ratings for any Class of Certificates then
rated by such Rating Agency.
Depositary Threshold Rating means the short-term
unsecured debt rating of
P-1 by
Moodys and the short-term issuer credit rating of
A-1+ by
Standard & Poors.
Depositary
The Bank of New York Mellon (the Bank) will act as
depositary (the Depositary). The Bank is a New York
State chartered bank that formerly was named The Bank of
New York. The Bank has total assets of approximately
$162.0 billion and total equity capital of approximately
$12.7 billion, in each case at June 30, 2009. The Bank
is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon
Corporation.
The Bank has long-term senior debt ratings of Aaa from
Moodys Investors Service, Inc. (Moodys),
AA from Standard & Poors Ratings Services, a
Standard & Poors Financial Services LLC business
(Standard & Poors, and together with
Moodys, the Rating Agencies) and AA- from
Fitch Ratings (Fitch), and short-term deposit
ratings of P1 from Moodys,
A-1+ from
Standard & Poors and F1+ from Fitch.
The Banks principal office is located at One Wall Street,
New York, New York 10286, and its telephone number is
212-495-1784.
A copy of the most recent filings of The Bank of New York Mellon
Corporation with the Commission, including its Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
may be obtained from The Bank of New York Mellon
Corporations Public Relations Department, One Wall Street,
31st Floor,
(212) 635-1569
or from the Commission at
http://www.sec.gov.
The information that The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and
affiliates, including the Bank, file with the Commission is not
part of, and is not incorporated by reference in, this
Prospectus Supplement.
S-49
DESCRIPTION
OF THE ESCROW AGREEMENTS
The following summary describes the material terms of the escrow
and paying agent agreements (the Escrow Agreements).
The summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to all of the provisions of the Escrow
Agreements, each of which will be filed as an exhibit to a
Current Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission. The provisions
of the Escrow Agreements are substantially identical except as
otherwise indicated.
Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A., as escrow agent in respect of
each Trust (the Escrow Agent), Wilmington
Trust Company, as paying agent on behalf of the Escrow
Agent in respect of each Trust (the Paying Agent),
each Trustee and the Underwriters will enter into a separate
Escrow Agreement for the benefit of the Certificateholders of
each Trust as holders of the Escrow Receipts affixed thereto (in
such capacity, a Receiptholder). The cash proceeds
of the offering of Certificates of each Trust will be deposited
on behalf of the Escrow Agent (for the benefit of
Receiptholders) with the Depositary as Deposits relating to such
Trust. Each Escrow Agent shall permit the Trustee of the related
Trust to cause funds to be withdrawn from such Deposits on or
prior to the Delivery Period Termination Date to allow such
Trustee to purchase the related Equipment Notes pursuant to the
Note Purchase Agreement. In addition, the Escrow Agent shall
direct the Depositary to pay interest on the Deposits accrued in
accordance with the Deposit Agreement to the Paying Agent for
distribution to the Receiptholders.
Each Escrow Agreement requires that the Paying Agent establish
and maintain, for the benefit of the related Receiptholders, one
or more Paying Agent Account(s), which shall be
non-interest-bearing. The Paying Agent shall deposit interest on
Deposits and any unused Deposits withdrawn by the Escrow Agent
in the related Paying Agent Account. The Paying Agent shall
distribute these amounts on a Regular Distribution Date or
Special Distribution Date, as appropriate.
Upon receipt by the Depositary of cash proceeds from this
Offering, the Escrow Agent will issue one or more escrow
receipts (Escrow Receipts) which will be affixed by
the relevant Trustee to each Certificate. Each Escrow Receipt
evidences the related Receiptholders interest in amounts
from time to time deposited into the Paying Agent Account and is
limited in recourse to amounts deposited into such account. An
Escrow Receipt may not be assigned or transferred except in
connection with the assignment or transfer of the Certificate to
which it is affixed. Each Escrow Receipt will be registered by
the Escrow Agent in the same name and manner as the Certificate
to which it is affixed.
Each Receiptholder shall have the right (individually and
without the need for any other action of any person, including
the Escrow Agent or any other Receiptholder), upon any default
in the payment of interest on the Deposits when due by the
Depositary in accordance with the applicable Deposit Agreement,
or upon any default in the payment of the final withdrawal when
due by the Depositary in accordance with the terms of the
applicable Deposit Agreement and Escrow Agreement, to proceed
directly against the Depositary. The Escrow Agent will notify
Receiptholders in the event of a default in any such payment and
will promptly forward to Receiptholders upon receipt copies of
all written communications relating to any payments due to the
Receiptholders in respect of the Deposits.
S-50
DESCRIPTION
OF THE LIQUIDITY FACILITIES
The following summary describes the material terms of the
Liquidity Facilities and certain provisions of the Intercreditor
Agreement relating to the Liquidity Facilities. The summary does
not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to all of the provisions of the Liquidity Facilities
and the Intercreditor Agreement, each of which will be filed as
an exhibit to a Current Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission. The provisions
of the Liquidity Facilities are substantially identical except
as otherwise indicated.
General
Natixis S.A., acting through its New York Branch (the
Liquidity Provider), will enter into a separate
revolving credit agreement (each, a Liquidity
Facility) with the Subordination Agent with respect to
each Trust. On any Regular Distribution Date, if, after giving
effect to the subordination provisions of the Intercreditor
Agreement, the Subordination Agent does not have sufficient
funds for the payment of interest on the Class A or
Class B Certificates, the Liquidity Provider under the
relevant Liquidity Facility will make an advance (an
Interest Drawing) in the amount needed to fund such
interest shortfall up to the Maximum Available Commitment. The
maximum amount of Interest Drawings available under each
Liquidity Facility is expected to provide an amount sufficient
to pay interest on the related Class of Certificates on up to
three consecutive semiannual Regular Distribution Dates (without
regard to any expected future payments of principal on such
Certificates) at the respective interest rates shown on the
cover page of this Prospectus Supplement for such Certificates
(the Stated Interest Rates). If interest payment
defaults occur which exceed the amount covered by and available
under the Liquidity Facility for a Trust, the Certificateholders
of such Trust will bear their allocable share of the
deficiencies to the extent that there are no other sources of
funds. The initial Liquidity Provider for a Trust may be
replaced by one or more other entities under certain
circumstances.
Drawings
The aggregate amount available under the Liquidity Facility for
each Trust at November 10, 2010, the first Regular
Distribution Date after all Aircraft are expected to have been
financing pursuant to the Offering, assuming that such Aircraft
are so financed and that all interest due on or prior to
November 10, 2010, is paid, will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
Trust
|
|
Amount
|
|
Class A
|
|
$
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
|
|
Except as otherwise provided below, the Liquidity Facility for
each Trust will enable the Subordination Agent to make Interest
Drawings thereunder promptly on or after any Regular
Distribution Date if, after giving effect to the subordination
provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement, there are
insufficient funds available to the Subordination Agent to pay
interest on the Certificates of such Trust at the Stated
Interest Rate for such Trust; provided, however, that the
maximum amount available to be drawn under the Liquidity
Facility with respect to any Trust on any Regular Distribution
Date to fund any shortfall of interest on Certificates of such
Trust will not exceed the then Maximum Available Commitment
under such Liquidity Facility. The Maximum Available
Commitment at any time under each Liquidity Facility is an
amount equal to the then Maximum Commitment of such Liquidity
Facility less the aggregate amount of each Interest Drawing
outstanding under such Liquidity Facility at such time,
provided that following a Downgrade Drawing, a Special
Termination Drawing, a Final Drawing or a Non-Extension Drawing
under a Liquidity Facility, the Maximum Available Commitment
under such Liquidity Facility shall be zero.
Maximum Commitment for the Liquidity Facility for
the Class A Trust and the Class B Trust means
initially $ and
$ , respectively, as the same may
be reduced from time to time as described below.
Required Amount means, in relation to the Liquidity
Facility for any applicable Trust for any day, the sum of the
aggregate amount of interest, calculated at the rate per annum
equal to the Stated Interest Rate for such Trust, that would be
payable on such Class of Certificates on each of the three
successive Regular Distribution Dates
S-51
immediately following such day or, if such day is a Regular
Distribution Date, on such day and the succeeding two Regular
Distribution Dates, in each case calculated on the basis of the
Pool Balance of the corresponding Class of Certificates on such
day and without regard to expected future payments of principal
on such Class of Certificates.
The Liquidity Facility for any applicable Class of Certificates
does not provide for drawings thereunder to pay for principal of
or premium on the Certificates of such Class or any interest on
the Certificates of such Class in excess of the Stated Interest
Rate for such Class or more than three semiannual installments
of interest thereon or principal of or interest or premium on
the Certificates of any other Class. (Liquidity Facilities,
Section 2.02; Intercreditor Agreement, Section 3.5) In
addition, the Liquidity Facility with respect to each Trust does
not provide for drawings thereunder to pay any amounts payable
with respect to the Deposits relating to such Trust.
Each payment by a Liquidity Provider reduces by the same amount
the Maximum Available Commitment under the related Liquidity
Facility, subject to reinstatement as described below. With
respect to any Interest Drawing, upon reimbursement of the
applicable Liquidity Provider in full or in part for the amount
of such Interest Drawings plus interest thereon, the Maximum
Available Commitment under the applicable Liquidity Facility
will be reinstated by an amount equal to the amount of such
Interest Drawing so reimbursed to an amount not to exceed the
then Required Amount of such Liquidity Facility. However, the
Maximum Commitment Amount under such Liquidity Facility will not
be so reinstated at any time if (i) a Liquidity Event of
Default with respect to such Liquidity Facility shall have
occurred and be continuing and less than 65% of the then
aggregate outstanding principal amount of all Equipment Notes
are Performing Equipment Notes or (ii) a Final Drawing,
Downgrade Drawing, Special Termination Drawing or Non-Extension
Drawing shall have been made or an Interest Drawing shall have
been converted into a Final Advance. The Maximum Available
Commitment under any Liquidity Facility will not be reinstated
after a Final Drawing, Downgrade Drawing, Special Termination
Drawing or Non-Extension Drawing thereunder. On the first
Regular Distribution Date and on each date on which the Pool
Balance of a Trust shall have been reduced by payments made to
the related Certificateholders pursuant to the Intercreditor
Agreement, the Maximum Commitment of the Liquidity Facility for
the applicable Trust will be automatically reduced from time to
time to an amount equal to the then Required Amount. (Liquidity
Facilities, Section 2.04(a); Intercreditor Agreement,
Section 3.5(j))
Performing Equipment Note means an Equipment Note
with respect to which no payment default has occurred and is
continuing (without giving effect to any acceleration);
provided that in the event of a bankruptcy proceeding
under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in which Continental is a
debtor any payment default existing during the
60-day
period under Section 1110(a)(2)(A) of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (or such longer period as may apply
under Section 1110(b) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
as may apply for the cure of such payment default under
Section 1110(a)(2)(B) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code)
shall not be taken into consideration until the expiration of
the applicable period.
If at any time the short-term unsecured debt rating or
short-term issuer credit rating, as the case may be, of the
Liquidity Provider then issued by either Rating Agency is lower
than the Liquidity Threshold Rating (unless each Rating Agency
shall have confirmed in writing on or prior to the date of such
downgrading that such downgrading will not result in the
downgrading, withdrawal or suspension of the ratings of the
Certificates), and the applicable Liquidity Facility is not
replaced with a Replacement Facility within ten days after
receipt by the Subordination Agent of notice of such downgrading
and as otherwise provided in the Intercreditor Agreement, such
Liquidity Facility will be drawn in full up to the then Maximum
Available Commitment under such Liquidity Facility (the
Downgrade Drawing). The proceeds of a Downgrade
Drawing will be deposited into a cash collateral account (the
Cash Collateral Account) for the applicable Class of
Certificates and used for the same purposes and under the same
circumstances and subject to the same conditions as cash
payments of Interest Drawings under such Liquidity Facility
would be used. (Liquidity Facilities, Section 2.02(c);
Intercreditor Agreement, Section 3.5(c)) If a qualified
Replacement Facility is subsequently provided, the balance of
the Cash Collateral Account will be repaid to the replaced
Liquidity Provider.
A Replacement Facility for any Liquidity Facility
will mean an irrevocable liquidity facility (or liquidity
facilities) in substantially the form of the replaced Liquidity
Facility, including reinstatement provisions, or in such other
form (which may include a letter of credit) as shall permit the
Rating Agencies to confirm in writing their respective ratings
then in effect for the Certificates of an applicable Trust
(before downgrading of such ratings, if
S-52
any, as a result of the downgrading of the replaced Liquidity
Provider), in a face amount (or in an aggregate face amount)
equal to the then Required Amount for the replaced Liquidity
Facility and issued by a person (or persons) having a short-term
unsecured debt rating or short-term issuer credit rating, as the
case may be, issued by both Rating Agencies which are equal to
or higher than the Liquidity Threshold Rating. (Intercreditor
Agreement, Section 1.1) The provider of any Replacement
Facility will have the same rights (including, without
limitation, priority distribution rights and rights as
Controlling Party) under the Intercreditor Agreement
as the Liquidity Provider being replaced.
Liquidity Threshold Rating means the short-term
unsecured debt rating of
P-1 by
Moodys and the short-term issuer credit rating of
A-1 by
Standard & Poors.
If at any time during the
18-month
period prior to the final expected Regular Distribution Date,
the Pool Balance for a Trust is greater than the aggregate
outstanding principal amount of Equipment Notes held in such
Trust (other than any Equipment Notes previously sold or with
respect to which the collateral securing such Equipment Notes
has been disposed of), the Liquidity Provider may, in its
discretion, give notice of special termination under the
applicable Liquidity Facility (a Special Termination
Notice). The effect of the delivery of such Special
Termination Notice will be to cause (i) such Liquidity
Facility to expire on the fifth Business Day after the date on
which such Special Termination Notice is received by the
Subordination Agent, (ii) the Subordination Agent to
promptly request, and the Liquidity Provider to promptly make, a
special termination drawing (a Special Termination
Drawing) in an amount equal to the Maximum Available
Commitment thereunder and (iii) all amounts owing to the
Liquidity Provider automatically to become accelerated. The
proceeds of a Special Termination Drawing will be deposited into
the Cash Collateral Account and used for the same purposes under
the same circumstances and subject to the same conditions as
cash payments of Interest Drawings under such Liquidity Facility
would be used. (Liquidity Facilities, Section 6.02;
Intercreditor Agreement, Section 3.5(m))
The Liquidity Facility for each Trust provides that the
applicable Liquidity Providers obligations thereunder will
expire on the earliest of:
|
|
|
|
|
364 days after the Issuance Date (counting from, and
including, the Issuance Date).
|
|
|
|
The date on which the Subordination Agent delivers to such
Liquidity Provider a certification that all of the Certificates
of such Trust have been paid in full.
|
|
|
|
The date on which the Subordination Agent delivers to such
Liquidity Provider a certification that a Replacement Facility
has been substituted for such Liquidity Facility.
|
|
|
|
The fifth Business Day following receipt by the Subordination
Agent of a Termination Notice from such Liquidity Provider (see
Liquidity Events of Default).
|
|
|
|
The fifth Business Day following receipt by the Subordination
Agent of a Special Termination Notice from such Liquidity
Provider.
|
|
|
|
The date on which no amount is or may (by reason of
reinstatement) become available for drawing under such Liquidity
Facility.
|
Each Liquidity Facility provides that it may be extended for
additional
364-day
periods by mutual agreement of the relevant Liquidity Provider
and the Subordination Agent. The Intercreditor Agreement will
provide for the replacement of the Liquidity Facility for any
applicable Trust if such Liquidity Facility is scheduled to
expire earlier than 15 days after the Final Maturity Date
for the Certificates of such Trust and such Liquidity Facility
is not extended at least 25 days prior to its then
scheduled expiration date. If such Liquidity Facility is not so
extended or replaced by the 25th day prior to its then
scheduled expiration date, such Liquidity Facility will be drawn
in full up to the then Maximum Available Commitment under such
Liquidity Facility (the Non-Extension Drawing). The
proceeds of the Non-Extension Drawing under any Liquidity
Facility will be deposited in the Cash Collateral Account for
the related Trust to be used for the same purposes and under the
same circumstances, and subject to the same conditions, as cash
payments of Interest Drawings under such Liquidity Facility
would be used. (Liquidity Facilities, Section 2.02(b);
Intercreditor Agreement, Section 3.5(d))
S-53
Subject to certain limitations, Continental may, at its option,
arrange for a Replacement Facility at any time to replace the
Liquidity Facility for any applicable Trust (including without
limitation any Replacement Facility described in the following
sentence). In addition, if the Liquidity Provider shall
determine not to extend any Liquidity Facility, then the
Liquidity Provider may, at its option, arrange for a Replacement
Facility to replace such Liquidity Facility (i) during the
period no earlier than 60 days and no later than
40 days prior to the then scheduled expiration date of such
Liquidity Facility and (ii) at any time after a
Non-Extension Drawing has been made. The Liquidity Provider may
also arrange for a Replacement Facility to replace any of its
Liquidity Facilities at any time after a Downgrade Drawing under
such Liquidity Facility. If any Replacement Facility is provided
at any time after a Downgrade Drawing, a Special Termination
Drawing or a Non-Extension Drawing under any Liquidity Facility,
the funds with respect to such Liquidity Facility on deposit in
the Cash Collateral Account for such Trust will be returned to
the Liquidity Provider being replaced. (Intercreditor Agreement,
Section 3.5(e))
Upon receipt by the Subordination Agent of a Termination Notice
with respect to any Liquidity Facility from the relevant
Liquidity Provider, the Subordination Agent shall request a
final drawing (a Final Drawing) under such Liquidity
Facility, in an amount equal to the then Maximum Available
Commitment thereunder. The Subordination Agent will hold the
proceeds of the Final Drawing in the Cash Collateral Account for
the related Trust as cash collateral to be used for the same
purposes and under the same circumstances, and subject to the
same conditions, as cash payments of Interest Drawings under
such Liquidity Facility would be used. (Liquidity Facilities,
Section 2.02(d); Intercreditor Agreement,
Section 3.5(i))
Drawings under any Liquidity Facility will be made by delivery
by the Subordination Agent of a certificate in the form required
by such Liquidity Facility. Upon receipt of such a certificate,
the relevant Liquidity Provider is obligated to make payment of
the drawing requested thereby in immediately available funds.
Upon payment by the relevant Liquidity Provider of the amount
specified in any drawing under any Liquidity Facility, such
Liquidity Provider will be fully discharged of its obligations
under such Liquidity Facility with respect to such drawing and
will not thereafter be obligated to make any further payments
under such Liquidity Facility in respect of such drawing to the
Subordination Agent or any other person.
Reimbursement
of Drawings
The Subordination Agent must reimburse amounts drawn under any
Liquidity Facility by reason of an Interest Drawing, Final
Drawing, Downgrade Drawing, Special Termination Drawing or
Non-Extension Drawing and interest thereon, but only to the
extent that the Subordination Agent has funds available
therefor. See Description of the Intercreditor
Agreement Priority of Distributions.
Interest
Drawings, Special Termination Drawing and Final
Drawing
Amounts drawn by reason of an Interest Drawing, Special
Termination Drawing or Final Drawing will be immediately due and
payable, together with interest on the amount of such drawing.
From the date of the drawing to (but excluding) the third
business day following the applicable Liquidity Providers
receipt of the notice of such Interest Drawing or Final Drawing,
interest will accrue at the Base Rate plus 4% per annum.
Thereafter, interest will accrue at LIBOR for the applicable
interest period (or, as described in the fourth paragraph under
Reimbursement of Drawings Interest
Drawings, Special Termination Drawing and Final Drawing,
the Base Rate) plus 4% per annum. In the case of the Final
Drawing, however, the Subordination Agent may convert the Final
Drawing into a drawing bearing interest at the Base Rate plus 4%
per annum on the last day of an interest period for such
Drawing. Any Special Termination Drawing under the Liquidity
Facilities, other than any portion thereof applied to the
payment of interest on the Certificates, will bear interest at
the Base Rate for the applicable interest period plus a
specified margin per annum from the date of the drawing to (but
excluding) the third business day following the applicable
Liquidity Providers receipt of the notice of such Special
Termination Drawing. Thereafter, interest will accrue at LIBOR
for the applicable interest period (or, as described in the
fourth paragraph under Reimbursement of
Drawings Interest Drawings, Special Termination
Drawing and Final Drawing, the Base Rate) plus a specified
margin per annum.
Base Rate means, on any day, a fluctuating interest
rate per annum in effect from time to time, which rate per annum
shall at all times be equal to (a) the weighted average of
the rates on overnight Federal funds transactions
S-54
with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal
funds brokers, as published for such day (or, if such day is not
a business day, for the next preceding business day) by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or if such rate is not so
published for any day that is a business day, the average of the
quotations for such day for such transactions received by the
applicable Liquidity Provider from three Federal funds brokers
of recognized standing selected by it, plus (b) one-quarter
of one percent (1/4 of 1%).
LIBOR means, with respect to any interest period,
(i) the rate per annum appearing on Reuters Screen LIBOR01
Page (or any successor or substitute therefor) at approximately
11:00 a.m. (London time) two business days before the first
day of such interest period, as the rate for dollar deposits
with a maturity comparable to such interest period, or
(ii) if the rate calculated pursuant to clause (i)
above is not available, the average (rounded upwards, if
necessary, to the next
1/16
of 1%) of the rates per annum at which deposits in dollars are
offered for the relevant interest period by three banks of
recognized standing selected by the applicable Liquidity
Provider in the London interbank market at approximately
11:00 a.m. (London time) two business days before the first
day of such interest period in an amount approximately equal to
the principal amount of the drawing to which such interest
period is to apply and for a period comparable to such interest
period.
If at any time, a Liquidity Provider shall have determined
(which determination shall be conclusive and binding upon the
Subordination Agent, absent manifest error) that, by reason of
circumstances affecting the relevant interbank lending market
generally, LIBOR determined or to be determined for the current
or the immediately succeeding interest period will not
adequately and fairly reflect the cost to such Liquidity
Provider (as conclusively certified by such Liquidity Provider,
absent manifest error) of making or maintaining advances, such
Liquidity Provider shall give notice thereof (a Rate
Determination Notice) to the Subordination Agent. If such
notice is given, then the outstanding principal amount of the
LIBOR advances under the applicable Liquidity Facility shall be
converted to Base Rate advances effective from the date of the
Rate Determination Notice; provided that the rate then
applicable to in respect of such Base Rate advances shall be
increased by one per cent (1.00%). Each applicable Liquidity
Provider shall withdraw a Rate Determination Notice given under
the applicable Liquidity Facility when such Liquidity Provider
determines that the circumstances giving rise to such Rate
Determination Notice no longer apply to such Liquidity Provider,
and the Base Rate advances under the applicable Liquidity
Facility shall be converted to LIBOR advances effective as the
first day of the next succeeding interest period after the date
of such withdrawal. Each change in the Base Rate shall become
effective immediately. (Liquidity Facilities, Section 3.07(g))
Downgrade
Drawings and Non-Extension Drawings
The amount drawn under any Liquidity Facility by reason of a
Downgrade Drawing or a Non-Extension Drawing will be treated as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Such amount will be released on any Distribution Date to the
applicable Liquidity Provider to the extent that such amount
exceeds the Required Amount.
|
|
|
|
Any portion of such amount withdrawn from the Cash Collateral
Account for such Certificates to pay interest on such
Certificates will be treated in the same way as Interest
Drawings.
|
|
|
|
The balance of such amount will be invested in certain specified
eligible investments.
|
Any Downgrade Drawing under any Liquidity Facility, other than
any portion thereof applied to the payment of interest on the
applicable Certificates, will bear interest (x) subject to
clause (y) below, from the date of the drawing to (but
excluding) the third business day following the applicable
Liquidity Providers receipt of the notice of such
Downgrade Drawing, interest will accrue at the Base Rate plus a
specified margin per annum, and thereafter, interest will accrue
at LIBOR for the applicable interest period (or, as described in
the fourth paragraph under Reimbursement of
Drawings Interest Drawings, Special Termination
Drawing and Final Drawing, the Base Rate) plus a specified
margin annum. on amounts deposited in the Cash Collateral
Account attributable to such Liquidity Facility plus a specified
margin per annum on the outstanding amount from time to time of
such Downgrade Drawing and (y) from and after the date, if
any, on which it is converted into a Final Drawing as described
below under Liquidity Events of Default,
at a rate equal to LIBOR for the applicable interest period
S-55
(or, as described in the first or fourth paragraph under
Interest Drawings, Special Termination Drawing
and Final Drawing, the Base Rate) plus 4% per annum.
Any Non-Extension Drawing under any Liquidity Facility, other
than any portion thereof applied to the payment of interest on
the applicable Certificates, will bear interest (x) subject
to clause (y) below, in an amount equal to the investment
earnings on amounts deposited in the Cash Collateral Account
attributable to such Liquidity Facility plus a specified rate
per annum on the outstanding amount from time to time of such
Non-Extension Drawing and (y) from and after the date, if
any, on which it is converted into a Final Drawing as described
below under Liquidity Events of Default,
at a rate equal to LIBOR for the applicable interest period (or,
as described in the first or fourth paragraph under
Interest Drawings, Special Termination Drawing
and Final Drawing, the Base Rate) plus 4% per annum.
Liquidity
Events of Default
Events of default under each Liquidity Facility (each, a
Liquidity Event of Default) will consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
The acceleration of all of the Equipment Notes (provided,
that if such acceleration occurs during the Delivery Period, the
aggregate principal amount thereof exceeds $240 million).
|
|
|
|
Certain bankruptcy or similar events involving Continental.
(Liquidity Facilities, Section 1.01)
|
If (i) any Liquidity Event of Default under any Liquidity
Facility has occurred and is continuing and (ii) less than
65% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of all
Equipment Notes are Performing Equipment Notes, the applicable
Liquidity Provider may, in its discretion, give a notice of
termination of such Liquidity Facility to the Subordination
Agent (a Termination Notice). The Termination Notice
will have the following consequences:
|
|
|
|
|
Such Liquidity Facility will expire on the fifth Business Day
after the date on which such Termination Notice is received by
the Subordination Agent.
|
|
|
|
The Subordination Agent will promptly request, and the
applicable Liquidity Provider will make, a Final Drawing
thereunder in an amount equal to the then Maximum Available
Commitment thereunder.
|
|
|
|
Any drawing remaining unreimbursed as of the date of termination
will be automatically converted into a Final Drawing under such
Liquidity Facility.
|
|
|
|
All amounts owing to the applicable Liquidity Provider
automatically will be accelerated.
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Subordination Agent will be
obligated to pay amounts owing to the Liquidity Provider only to
the extent of funds available therefor after giving effect to
the payments in accordance with the provisions set forth under
Description of the Intercreditor Agreement
Priority of Distributions. (Liquidity Facilities,
Section 6.01) Upon the circumstances described below under
Description of the Intercreditor Agreement
Intercreditor Rights, the Liquidity Provider may become
the Controlling Party with respect to the exercise of remedies
under the Indentures. (Intercreditor Agreement,
Section 2.6(c))
Liquidity
Provider
The initial Liquidity Provider for each Liquidity Facility will
be Natixis S.A., acting through its New York Branch. The
Liquidity Provider has a short-term unsecured debt rating of
A-1 from
Moodys and a short-term issuer credit rating of
P-1 from
Standard & Poors.
S-56
The following summary describes the material provisions of the
Intercreditor Agreement (the Intercreditor
Agreement) among the Trustees, the Liquidity Provider and
Wilmington Trust Company, as subordination agent (the
Subordination Agent). The summary does not purport
to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
all of the provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement, which will
be filed as an exhibit to a Current Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission.
Intercreditor
Rights
Controlling
Party
Each Loan Trustee will be directed in taking, or refraining from
taking, any action under an Indenture or with respect to the
Equipment Notes issued under such Indenture, by the holders of
at least a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the
Equipment Notes issued under such Indenture, so long as no
Indenture Default shall have occurred and be continuing
thereunder. For so long as the Subordination Agent is the
registered holder of the Equipment Notes, the Subordination
Agent will act with respect to the preceding sentence in
accordance with the directions of the Trustees for whom the
Equipment Notes issued under such Indenture are held as
Trust Property, to the extent constituting, in the
aggregate, directions with respect to the required principal
amount of Equipment Notes.
After the occurrence and during the continuance of an Indenture
Default under an Indenture, each Loan Trustee will be directed
in taking, or refraining from taking, any action thereunder or
with respect to the Equipment Notes issued under such Indenture,
including acceleration of such Equipment Notes or foreclosing
the lien on the related Aircraft, by the Controlling Party,
subject to the limitations described below. See
Description of the Certificates Indenture
Defaults and Certain Rights Upon an Indenture Default for
a description of the rights of the Certificateholders of each
Trust to direct the respective Trustees.
The Controlling Party will be:
|
|
|
|
|
The Class A Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Upon payment of Final Distributions to the holders of
Class A Certificates, the Class B Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Under certain circumstances, and notwithstanding the foregoing,
the Liquidity Provider with the largest amount owed to it, as
discussed in the next paragraph.
|
At any time after 18 months from the earliest to occur of
(x) the date on which the entire available amount under any
Liquidity Facility shall have been drawn (for any reason other
than a Downgrade Drawing, Special Termination Drawing or
Non-Extension Drawing that has not been converted into a Final
Drawing) and shall remain unreimbursed, (y) the date on
which the entire amount of any Downgrade Drawing, Special
Termination Drawing or Non-Extension Drawing shall have been
withdrawn from the relevant Cash Collateral Account to pay
interest on the relevant Class of Certificates and shall remain
unreimbursed and (z) the date on which all Equipment Notes
shall have been accelerated (provided that if such
acceleration occurs prior to the Delivery Period Termination
Date, the aggregate principal amount thereof exceeds
$240 million), the Liquidity Provider with the highest
outstanding amount of Liquidity Obligations (so long as such
Liquidity Provider has not defaulted in its obligation to make
any drawing under any Liquidity Facility) shall have the right
to become the Controlling Party.
For purposes of giving effect to the rights of the Controlling
Party, each Trustee (to the extent not the Controlling Party)
shall irrevocably agree, and the Certificateholders (other than
the Certificateholders represented by the Controlling Party)
will be deemed to agree by virtue of their purchase of
Certificates, that the Subordination Agent, as record holder of
the Equipment Notes, shall exercise its voting rights in respect
of the Equipment Notes as directed by the Controlling Party.
(Intercreditor Agreement, Section 2.6) For a description of
certain limitations on the Controlling Partys rights to
exercise remedies, see Description of the Equipment
Notes Remedies.
Final Distributions means, with respect to the
Certificates of any Trust on any Distribution Date, the sum of
(x) the aggregate amount of all accrued and unpaid interest
on such Certificates (excluding interest payable on the Deposits
relating to such Trust) and (y) the Pool Balance of such
Certificates as of the immediately preceding
S-57
Distribution Date (less the amount of the Deposits for such
Class of Certificates as of such preceding Distribution Date
other than any portion of such Deposits thereafter used to
acquire Equipment Notes pursuant to the Note Purchase
Agreement). For purposes of calculating Final Distributions with
respect to the Certificates of any Trust, any premium paid on
the Equipment Notes held in such Trust which has not been
distributed to the Certificateholders of such Trust (other than
such premium or a portion thereof applied to the payment of
interest on the Certificates of such Trust or the reduction of
the Pool Balance of such Trust) shall be added to the amount of
such Final Distributions.
Limitation
on Exercise of Remedies
So long as any Certificates are outstanding, during nine months
after the earlier of (x) the acceleration of the Equipment
Notes under any Indenture and (y) the bankruptcy or
insolvency of Continental, without the consent of each Trustee
(and the Additional Trustee, if Additional Junior Certificates
are then outstanding), no Aircraft subject to the lien of such
Indenture or such Equipment Notes may be sold in the exercise of
remedies under such Indenture, if the net proceeds from such
sale would be less than the Minimum Sale Price for such Aircraft
or such Equipment Notes.
Minimum Sale Price means, with respect to any
Aircraft or the Equipment Notes issued in respect of such
Aircraft, at any time, in the case of the sale of an Aircraft,
75%, or in the case of the sale of related Equipment Notes, 85%,
of the Appraised Current Market Value of such Aircraft.
Following the occurrence and during the continuation of an
Indenture Default under any Indenture, in the exercise of
remedies pursuant to such Indenture, the Loan Trustee under such
Indenture may be directed to lease the Aircraft to any person
(including Continental) so long as the Loan Trustee in doing so
acts in a commercially reasonable manner within the
meaning of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as in
effect in any applicable jurisdiction (including
Sections 9-610
and 9-627 thereof).
If following certain events of bankruptcy, reorganization or
insolvency with respect to Continental described in the
Intercreditor Agreement (a Continental Bankruptcy
Event) and during the pendency thereof, the Controlling
Party receives a proposal from or on behalf of Continental to
restructure the financing of any one or more of the Aircraft,
the Controlling Party will promptly thereafter give the
Subordination Agent and each Trustee (and the Additional
Trustee, if Additional Junior Certificates are then outstanding)
notice of the material economic terms and conditions of such
restructuring proposal whereupon the Subordination Agent acting
on behalf of each Trustee (and the Additional Trustee, if
Additional Junior Certificates are then outstanding) will
endeavor using reasonable commercial efforts to make such terms
and conditions of such restructuring proposal available to all
Certificateholders (and, if then outstanding, holders of
Additional Junior Certificates) (whether by posting on
DTCs Internet board or otherwise). Thereafter, the
Subordination Agent may not, whether acting on instructions of
the Controlling Party or otherwise, without the consent of each
Trustee (and the Additional Trustee, if Additional Junior
Certificates are then outstanding), enter into any term sheet,
stipulation or other agreement (whether in the form of an
adequate protection stipulation, an extension under
Section 1110(b) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
otherwise) to effect any such restructuring proposal with or on
behalf of Continental unless and until the material economic
terms and conditions of such restructuring proposal shall have
been made available to all Certificateholders (and, if then
outstanding, holders of Additional Junior Certificates) for a
period of not less than 15 calendar days (except that such
requirement shall not apply to any such term sheet, stipulation
or other agreement that is entered into on or prior to the
expiry of the
60-Day
Period and that is effective for a period not longer than three
months from the expiry of the
60-Day
Period).
In the event that any holder of Class B Certificates or of
Additional Junior Certificates, if issued, gives irrevocable
notice of the exercise of its right to purchase all (but not
less than all) of the Class of Certificates represented by the
then Controlling Party (as described in Description of the
Certificates Purchase Rights of
Certificateholders), prior to the expiry of the
15-day
notice period specified above, such Controlling Party may not
direct the Subordination Agent or any Trustee to enter into any
such restructuring proposal with respect to any of the Aircraft,
unless and until such holder fails to purchase such Class of
Certificates on the date that it is required to make such
purchase.
S-58
Post
Default Appraisals
Upon the occurrence and continuation of an Indenture Default
under any Indenture, the Subordination Agent will be required to
obtain three desktop appraisals from the appraisers selected by
the Controlling Party setting forth the current market value,
current lease rate and distressed value (in each case, as
defined by the International Society of Transport Aircraft
Trading) of the Aircraft subject to such Indenture (each such
appraisal, an Appraisal and the current market value
appraisals being referred to herein as the Post Default
Appraisals). For so long as any Indenture Default shall be
continuing under any Indenture, and without limiting the right
of the Controlling Party to request more frequent Appraisals,
the Subordination Agent will be required to obtain additional
Appraisals on the date that is 364 days from the date of
the most recent Appraisal or if a Continental Bankruptcy Event
shall have occurred and is continuing, on the date that is
180 days from the date of the most recent Appraisal.
Appraised Current Market Value of any Aircraft means
the lower of the average and the median of the three most recent
Post Default Appraisals of such Aircraft.
Priority
of Distributions
All payments in respect of the Equipment Notes and certain other
payments received on each Regular Distribution Date or Special
Distribution Date (each, a Distribution Date) will
be promptly distributed by the Subordination Agent on such
Distribution Date in the following order of priority:
|
|
|
|
|
To the Subordination Agent, any Trustee, any Certificateholder
and any Liquidity Provider to the extent required to pay certain
out-of-pocket
costs and expenses actually incurred by the Subordination Agent
(or reasonably expected to be incurred by the Subordination
Agent for the period ending on the next succeeding Regular
Distribution Date, which shall not exceed $150,000 unless
approved in writing by the Controlling Party) or any Trustee or
to reimburse any Certificateholder or the Liquidity Provider in
respect of payments made to the Subordination Agent or any
Trustee in connection with the protection or realization of the
value of the Equipment Notes held by the Subordination Agent or
any Collateral under (and as defined in) any Indenture
(collectively, the Administration Expenses).
|
|
|
|
To the Liquidity Provider (a) to the extent required to pay
the Liquidity Expenses or (b) in the case of a Special
Payment on account of the redemption, purchase or prepayment of
all of the Equipment Notes issued pursuant to an Indenture (an
Equipment Note Special Payment), so long as no
Indenture Default has occurred and is continuing under any
Indenture, the amount of accrued and unpaid Liquidity Expenses
that are not yet due, multiplied by the Section 2.4
Fraction or, if an Indenture Default has occurred and is
continuing, clause (a) will apply.
|
|
|
|
To the Liquidity Provider (a) to the extent required to pay
interest accrued on the Liquidity Obligations and if a Special
Termination Drawing has been made and has not been converted
into a Final Drawing, to pay the outstanding amount of such
Special Termination Drawing or (b) in the case of an
Equipment Note Special Payment, so long as no Indenture Default
has occurred and is continuing under any Indenture, to the
extent required to pay accrued and unpaid interest then in
arrears on the Liquidity Obligations plus an amount equal to the
amount of accrued and unpaid interest on the Liquidity
Obligations not in arrears, multiplied by the Section 2.4
Fraction and if a Special Termination Drawing has been made and
has not been converted into a Final Drawing, the outstanding
amount of such Special Termination Drawing or, if an Indenture
Default has occurred and is continuing, clause (a) will
apply.
|
|
|
|
To (i) the Liquidity Provider to the extent required to pay
the outstanding amount of all Liquidity Obligations and
(ii) if applicable, with respect to any particular
Liquidity Facility, unless (in the case of this clause (ii)
only) (x) less than 65% of the aggregate outstanding
principal amount of all Equipment Notes are Performing Equipment
Notes and a Liquidity Event of Default shall have occurred and
is continuing under such Liquidity Facility or (y) a Final
Drawing shall have occurred under such Liquidity Facility, the
Subordination Agent to replenish the Cash Collateral Account
with respect to such Liquidity Facility up to the Required
Amount for the related Class of Certificates.
|
|
|
|
To the Subordination Agent, any Trustee or any Certificateholder
to the extent required to pay certain fees, taxes, charges and
other amounts payable.
|
S-59
|
|
|
|
|
To the Class A Trustee (a) to the extent required to
pay accrued and unpaid interest at the Stated Interest Rate on
the Pool Balance of the Class A Certificates (excluding
interest, if any, payable with respect to the Deposits relating
to such Class of Certificates) or (b) in the case of an
Equipment Note Special Payment, so long as no Indenture Default
has occurred and is continuing under any Indenture, to the
extent required to pay any such interest that is then due
together with (without duplication) accrued and unpaid interest
at the Stated Interest Rate on the outstanding principal amount
of the Series A Equipment Notes held in the Class A
Trust being redeemed, purchased or prepaid or, if an Indenture
Default has occurred and is continuing, clause (a) will
apply.
|
|
|
|
To the Class B Trustee (a) to the extent required to
pay accrued and unpaid Class B Adjusted Interest on the
Class B Certificates (excluding interest, if any, payable
with respect to the Deposits relating to such Class of
Certificates) or (b) in the case of an Equipment Note
Special Payment, so long as no Indenture Default has occurred
and is continuing under any Indenture, to the extent required to
pay any such Class B Adjusted Interest that is then due or,
if an Indenture Default has occurred and is continuing,
clause (a) will apply.
|
|
|
|
To the Class A Trustee to the extent required to pay
Expected Distributions on the Class A Certificates.
|
|
|
|
To the Class B Trustee (a) to the extent required to
pay accrued and unpaid interest at the Stated Interest Rate on
the Pool Balance of the Class B Certificates (other than
Class B Adjusted Interest paid above) or, (b) in the
case of an Equipment Note Special Payment, so long as no
Indenture Default has occurred and is continuing under any
Indenture, to the extent required to pay any such interest that
is then due (other than Class B Adjusted Interest paid
above) together with (without duplication) accrued and unpaid
interest at the Stated Interest Rate on the outstanding
principal amount of the Series B Equipment Notes held in
the Class B Trust and being redeemed, purchased or prepaid
or, if an Indenture Default has occurred and is continuing,
clause (a) will apply.
|
|
|
|
To the Class B Trustee to the extent required to pay
Expected Distributions on the Class B Certificates.
|
If a Class of Additional Junior Certificates has been issued,
the priority of distributions in the Intercreditor Agreement may
be revised such that certain obligations relating to the
Additional Junior Certificates may rank ahead of certain
obligations with respect to the Certificates. See Possible
Issuance of Additional Junior Certificates and Refinancing of
Certificates.
Section 2.4 Fraction means, with respect to any
Special Distribution Date, a fraction, the numerator of which
shall be the amount of principal of the applicable Series A
Equipment Notes and Series B Equipment Notes being
redeemed, purchased or prepaid on such Special Distribution
Date, and the denominator of which shall be the aggregate unpaid
principal amount of all Series A Equipment Notes and
Series B Equipment Notes outstanding as of such Special
Distribution Date. The definition of Section 2.4
Fraction will be revised if Additional Junior Certificates
are issued. See Possible Issuance of Additional Junior
Certificates and Refinancing of Certificates.
Liquidity Obligations means the obligations of the
Subordination Agent to reimburse or to pay the Liquidity
Provider all principal, interest, fees and other amounts owing
to it under each Liquidity Facility or certain other agreements.
Liquidity Expenses means the Liquidity Obligations
other than any interest accrued thereon or the principal amount
of any drawing under the Liquidity Facilities.
Expected Distributions means, with respect to the
Certificates of any Trust on any Distribution Date (the
Current Distribution Date), the difference between:
(A) the Pool Balance of such Certificates as of the
immediately preceding Distribution Date (or, if the Current
Distribution Date is the first Distribution Date, the original
aggregate face amount of the Certificates of such
Trust), and
(B) the Pool Balance of such Certificates as of the Current
Distribution Date calculated on the basis that (i) the
principal of the Equipment Notes other than Performing Equipment
Notes (the Non-Performing Equipment Notes) held in
such Trust has been paid in full and such payments have been
distributed to the holders of such Certificates, (ii) the
principal of the Performing Equipment Notes held in such Trust
has been
S-60
paid when due (but without giving effect to any acceleration of
Performing Equipment Notes) and such payments have been
distributed to the holders of such Certificates and
(iii) the principal of any Equipment Notes formerly held in
such Trust that have been sold pursuant to the Intercreditor
Agreement has been paid in full and such payments have been
distributed to the holders of such Certificates, but without
giving effect to any reduction in the Pool Balance as a result
of any distribution attributable to Deposits occurring after the
immediately preceding Distribution Date (or, if the Current
Distribution Date is the first Distribution Date, occurring
after the initial issuance of the Certificates of such Trust).
For purposes of calculating Expected Distributions with respect
to the Certificates of any Trust, any premium paid on the
Equipment Notes held in such Trust that has not been distributed
to the Certificateholders of such Trust (other than such premium
or a portion thereof applied to the payment of interest on the
Certificates of such Trust or the reduction of the Pool Balance
of such Trust) shall be added to the amount of Expected
Distributions.
Class B Adjusted Interest means, as of any
Distribution Date, (I) any interest described in
clause (II) of this definition accruing prior to the
immediately preceding Distribution Date which remains unpaid and
(II) interest at the Stated Interest Rate for the
Class B Certificates (x) for the number of days during
the period commencing on, and including, the immediately
preceding Distribution Date (or, if the current Distribution
Date is the first Distribution Date, the Issuance Date) and
ending on, but excluding, the current Distribution Date, on the
Preferred B Pool Balance on such Distribution Date and
(y) on the principal amount calculated pursuant to clauses
(B)(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of the definition of
Preferred B Pool Balance for each Series B Equipment Note
with respect to which a disposition, distribution, sale or
Deemed Disposition Event has occurred since the immediately
preceding Distribution Date (but only if no such event has
previously occurred with respect to such Series B Equipment
Note), for each day during the period, for each such
Series B Equipment Note, commencing on, and including, the
immediately preceding Distribution Date (or, if the current
Distribution Date is the first Distribution Date, the Issuance
Date) and ending on, but excluding the date of disposition,
distribution, sale or Deemed Disposition Event with respect to
such Series B Equipment Note, Aircraft or Collateral under
(and as defined in) the related Indenture, as the case may be.
Preferred B Pool Balance means, as of any date, the
excess of (A) the Pool Balance of the Class B
Certificates as of the immediately preceding Distribution Date
(or, if such date is on or before the first Distribution Date,
the original aggregate face amount of the Class B
Certificates) (after giving effect to payments made on such
date) over (B) the sum of (i) the outstanding
principal amount of each Series B Equipment Note that
remains unpaid as of such date subsequent to the disposition of
the Collateral under (and as defined in) the related Indenture
and after giving effect to any distributions of the proceeds of
such disposition applied under such Indenture to the payment of
each such Series B Equipment Note, (ii) the
outstanding principal amount of each Series B Equipment
Note that remains unpaid as of such date subsequent to the
scheduled date of mandatory redemption of such Series B
Equipment Note following an Event of Loss with respect to the
Aircraft which secured such Series B Equipment Note and
after giving effect to the distributions of any proceeds in
respect of such Event of Loss applied under such Indenture to
the payment of each such Series B Equipment Note,
(iii) the excess, if any, of (x) the outstanding
amount of principal and interest as of the date of sale of each
Series B Equipment Note previously sold over (y) the
purchase price received with respect to the sale of such
Series B Equipment Note (net of any applicable costs and
expenses of sale) and (iv) the outstanding principal amount
of any Equipment Note of such Series with respect to which a
Deemed Disposition Event has occurred; provided, however, that
if more than one of the clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and
(iv) is applicable to any one Series B Equipment Note,
only the amount determined pursuant to the clause that first
became applicable shall be counted with respect to such
Series B Equipment Note.
Deemed Disposition Event means, in respect of any
Equipment Note, the continuation of an Indenture Default in
respect of such Equipment Note without an Actual Disposition
Event occurring in respect of such Equipment Note for a period
of five years from the date of the occurrence of such Indenture
Default.
Actual Disposition Event means, in respect of any
Equipment Note, (i) the disposition of the Aircraft
securing such Equipment Note, (ii) the occurrence of the
mandatory redemption date for such Equipment Note following an
Event of Loss with respect to the Aircraft which secured such
Equipment Note or (iii) the sale of such Equipment Note.
S-61
Interest Drawings under the applicable Liquidity Facility and
withdrawals from the applicable Cash Collateral Account in
respect of interest on the Certificates of the Class A or B
Trust, as applicable, will be distributed to the Trustee for
such Trust, notwithstanding the priority of distributions set
forth in the Intercreditor Agreement and otherwise described
herein. All amounts on deposit in the Cash Collateral Account
for any such Trust that are in excess of the Required Amount
will be paid to the applicable Liquidity Provider.
Voting of
Equipment Notes
In the event that the Subordination Agent, as the registered
holder of any Equipment Note, receives a request for its consent
to any amendment, supplement, modification, consent or waiver
under such Equipment Note or the related Indenture (or, if
applicable, the related Participation Agreement or other related
document), (i) if no Indenture Default shall have occurred
and be continuing with respect to such Indenture, the
Subordination Agent shall request directions from the applicable
Trustee and shall vote or consent in accordance with such
directions and (ii) if any Indenture Default shall have
occurred and be continuing with respect to such Indenture, the
Subordination Agent will exercise its voting rights as directed
by the Controlling Party, subject to certain limitations;
provided that no such amendment, modification, consent or
waiver shall, without the consent of the Liquidity Provider and
each affected Certificateholder, reduce the amount of principal
or interest payable by Continental under any Equipment Note or
change the time of payments or method of calculation of any
amount under any Equipment Note. (Intercreditor Agreement,
Section 9.1(b))
List of
Certificateholders
Upon the occurrence of an Indenture Default, the Subordination
Agent shall instruct the Trustee to, and the Trustee shall,
request that DTC post on its Internet bulletin board a
securities position listing setting forth the names of all the
parties reflected on DTCs books as holding interests in
the Certificates.
Reports
Promptly after the occurrence of a Triggering Event or an
Indenture Default resulting from the failure of Continental to
make payments on any Equipment Note and on every Regular
Distribution Date while the Triggering Event or such Indenture
Default shall be continuing, the Subordination Agent will
provide to the Trustee, the Liquidity Providers, the Rating
Agencies and Continental a statement setting forth the following
information:
|
|
|
|
|
After a bankruptcy of Continental, with respect to each
Aircraft, whether such Aircraft is (i) subject to the
60-day
period of Section 1110 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code,
(ii) subject to an election by Continental under
Section 1110(a) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code,
(iii) covered by an agreement contemplated by
Section 1110(b) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
(iv) not subject to any of (i), (ii) or (iii).
|
|
|
|
To the best of the Subordination Agents knowledge, after
requesting such information from Continental, (i) whether
the Aircraft are currently in service or parked in storage,
(ii) the maintenance status of the Aircraft and
(iii) location of the Engines (as defined in the
Indentures). Continental has agreed to provide such information
upon request of the Subordination Agent, but no more frequently
than every three months with respect to each Aircraft so long as
it is subject to the lien of an Indenture.
|
|
|
|
The current Pool Balance of the Certificates, the Preferred B
Pool Balance and outstanding principal amount of all Equipment
Notes for all Aircraft.
|
|
|
|
The expected amount of interest which will have accrued on the
Equipment Notes and on the Certificates as of the next Regular
Distribution Date.
|
|
|
|
The amounts paid to each person on such Distribution Date
pursuant to the Intercreditor Agreement.
|
|
|
|
Details of the amounts paid on such Distribution Date identified
by reference to the relevant provision of the Intercreditor
Agreement and the source of payment (by Aircraft and party).
|
|
|
|
If the Subordination Agent has made a Final Drawing under any
Liquidity Facility.
|
|
|
|
The amounts currently owed to each Liquidity Provider.
|
S-62
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts drawn under each Liquidity Facility.
|
|
|
|
After a Continental Bankruptcy Event, any operational reports
filed by Continental with the bankruptcy court which are
available to the Subordination Agent on a non-confidential basis.
|
The
Subordination Agent
Wilmington Trust Company will be the Subordination Agent
under the Intercreditor Agreement. Continental and its
affiliates may from time to time enter into banking and trustee
relationships with the Subordination Agent and its affiliates.
The Subordination Agents address is Wilmington
Trust Company, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington,
Delaware
19890-0001,
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.
The Subordination Agent may resign at any time, in which event a
successor Subordination Agent will be appointed as provided in
the Intercreditor Agreement. The Controlling Party may remove
the Subordination Agent for cause as provided in the
Intercreditor Agreement. In such circumstances, a successor
Subordination Agent will be appointed as provided in the
Intercreditor Agreement. Any resignation or removal of the
Subordination Agent and appointment of a successor Subordination
Agent does not become effective until acceptance of the
appointment by the successor Subordination Agent. (Intercreditor
Agreement, Section 8.1)
The 17 aircraft to be financed pursuant to this Offering
(collectively, the Aircraft) will consist of eight
Boeing aircraft currently owned by Continental and nine new
Boeing aircraft. The eight currently-owned aircraft consist of
one Boeing
777-224ER
aircraft, one Boeing
767-424ER
aircraft, three Boeing
757-224
aircraft and three Boeing
737-824
aircraft. The nine new aircraft consist of seven Boeing
737-824
aircraft, which will be selected by Continental from among nine
Boeing
737-824
aircraft scheduled for delivery from January to June 2010, and
two Boeing
777-224ER
aircraft scheduled for delivery in April and May 2010. The
Aircraft have been designed to be in compliance with Stage 3
noise level standards, which are the most restrictive regulatory
standards currently in effect in the United States for aircraft
noise abatement.
Boeing
777-224ER
Aircraft
The Boeing
777-224ER
aircraft is a long-range aircraft with a seating capacity of
approximately 283 passengers. The engine type utilized on
Continentals
777-224ER
aircraft is the General Electric GE90-94B.
Boeing
767-424ER
Aircraft
The Boeing
767-424
aircraft is a long-range aircraft with a seating capacity of
approximately 235 passengers. The engine type utilized on
Continentals
767-424ER
aircraft is the General Electric CF6-80C2B8F.
Boeing
757-224
Aircraft
The Boeing
757-224
aircraft is a medium-range aircraft with a seating capacity of
approximately 175 passengers. The engine type utilized on
Continentals
757-224
aircraft is the Rolls Royce RB211-535E4B.
Boeing
737-824
Aircraft
The Boeing
737-824
aircraft is a medium-range aircraft with a seating capacity of
approximately 160 passengers. The engine type utilized on
Continentals
737-824
aircraft is the CFM International, Inc. CFM56-7B26.
S-63
The
Appraisals
The table below sets forth the appraised values of the aircraft
that may be financed with the proceeds of this Offering, as
determined by Aircraft Information Services, Inc.
(AISI), BK Associates, Inc. (BK) and
Morten Beyer and Agnew, Inc. (MBA), independent
aircraft appraisal and consulting firms (the
Appraisers). Under the Note Purchase Agreement,
Continental will select to be financed pursuant to this Offering
seven of the nine new Boeing
737-824
aircraft listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registration
|
|
Manufacturers
|
|
Delivery
|
|
Appraisers Valuations
|
|
Appraised
|
Aircraft Type(1)
|
|
Number
|
|
Serial Number
|
|
Month(2)
|
|
AISI
|
|
BK
|
|
MBA
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N14235
|
|
|
|
28947
|
|
|
|
August 1999
|
|
|
$
|
26,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,590,000
|
|
|
$
|
29,210,000
|
|
|
$
|
28,833,333
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N37253
|
|
|
|
30584
|
|
|
|
September 2000
|
|
|
|
26,030,000
|
|
|
|
31,330,000
|
|
|
|
28,120,000
|
|
|
|
28,120,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N76254
|
|
|
|
30779
|
|
|
|
September 2000
|
|
|
|
24,920,000
|
|
|
|
30,230,000
|
|
|
|
26,910,000
|
|
|
|
26,910,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N76519
|
|
|
|
30132
|
|
|
|
January 2010
|
|
|
|
58,210,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,750,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N77520
|
|
|
|
31658
|
|
|
|
January 2010
|
|
|
|
58,210,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,750,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N79521
|
|
|
|
31662
|
|
|
|
February 2010
|
|
|
|
58,360,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,830,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N76522
|
|
|
|
31660
|
|
|
|
February 2010
|
|
|
|
58,360,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,830,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N76523
|
|
|
|
37101
|
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
|
58,520,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,910,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N78524
|
|
|
|
31642
|
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
|
58,520,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,910,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N77525
|
|
|
|
31659
|
|
|
|
April 2010
|
|
|
|
58,670,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,990,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N76526
|
|
|
|
38700
|
|
|
|
May 2010
|
|
|
|
58,820,000
|
|
|
|
49,550,000
|
|
|
|
48,070,000
|
|
|
|
49,550,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N87527
|
|
|
|
38701
|
|
|
|
June 2010
|
|
|
|
58,970,000
|
|
|
|
49,550,000
|
|
|
|
48,150,000
|
|
|
|
49,550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing
757-224
|
|
|
N17139
|
|
|
|
30352
|
|
|
|
February 2000
|
|
|
|
23,710,000
|
|
|
|
21,720,000
|
|
|
|
23,660,000
|
|
|
|
23,030,000
|
|
Boeing
757-224
|
|
|
N41140
|
|
|
|
30353
|
|
|
|
February 2000
|
|
|
|
21,970,000
|
|
|
|
23,810,000
|
|
|
|
25,010,000
|
|
|
|
23,596,667
|
|
Boeing
757-224
|
|
|
N19141
|
|
|
|
30354
|
|
|
|
June 2000
|
|
|
|
25,510,000
|
|
|
|
25,440,000
|
|
|
|
26,970,000
|
|
|
|
25,510,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing
767-424ER
|
|
|
N67052
|
|
|
|
29447
|
|
|
|
September 2000
|
|
|
|
38,040,000
|
|
|
|
51,160,000
|
|
|
|
44,650,000
|
|
|
|
44,616,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing
777-224ER
|
|
|
N79011
|
|
|
|
29859
|
|
|
|
June 1999
|
|
|
|
72,470,000
|
|
|
|
73,380,000
|
|
|
|
68,530,000
|
|
|
|
71,460,000
|
|
Boeing
777-224ER
|
|
|
N76021
|
|
|
|
39776
|
|
|
|
April 2010
|
|
|
|
157,960,000
|
|
|
|
128,950,000
|
|
|
|
130,100,000
|
|
|
|
130,100,000
|
|
Boeing
777-224ER
|
|
|
N77022
|
|
|
|
39777
|
|
|
|
May 2010
|
|
|
|
158,370,000
|
|
|
|
128,950,000
|
|
|
|
130,310,000
|
|
|
|
130,310,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The indicated registration number,
manufacturers serial number and delivery month for each
new aircraft reflect our current expectations, although these
may differ for the actual Aircraft financed hereunder. The
financing of each currently-owned Aircraft pursuant to this
Offering is expected to be effected after the existing security
interest on such Aircraft has been discharged, and the financing
of each new Aircraft is expected to be effected at delivery of
such Aircraft by Boeing to Continental. The actual delivery date
for any new aircraft may be subject to delay or acceleration.
See Timing of Financing the Aircraft.
Continental has certain rights to substitute other new aircraft
if the scheduled delivery date of any new aircraft is delayed
for more than 30 days after the month scheduled for
delivery. See Substitute Aircraft.
|
(2)
|
|
An aircraft with a Delivery Month
prior to the date of this Prospectus Supplement is a
currently-owned aircraft, and an aircraft with a Delivery Month
after the date of this Prospectus Supplement is a new aircraft.
|
(3)
|
|
The appraised value of each
aircraft set forth above is the lesser of the average and median
values of such aircraft as appraised by the Appraisers.
|
For purposes of the foregoing chart, AISI, BK and MBA each was
asked to provide its opinion as to the appraised value of each
aircraft. In the case of the new aircraft, such appraisals
indicate appraised base value, projected as of the scheduled
delivery month of the applicable aircraft, and in the case of
the currently-owned Aircraft, indicate appraised base value,
adjusted for the maintenance status of the Aircraft. As part of
this process, all three Appraisers performed desk
top appraisals without any physical inspection of the
aircraft. The appraisals are based on various assumptions and
methodologies, which vary among the appraisals. AISI and BK each
assumed for purposes of its appraisal of two of the
currently-owned Aircraft that certain maintenance had been
performed on such Aircraft and ascribed value to such
maintenance, while MBA did not ascribe value to such
maintenance. Continental is planning to have such maintenance
performed on such Aircraft prior to June 2010. It is a condition
precedent to each Trustees obligation to purchase
Equipment Notes relating to each such Aircraft that such
maintenance shall have been performed on such Aircraft. See
Timing of Financing the Aircraft. The
Appraisers have delivered letters summarizing their respective
appraisals, copies of which are annexed to this
S-64
Prospectus Supplement as Appendix II. For a discussion of
the assumptions and methodologies used in each of the
appraisals, reference is hereby made to such summaries. In
addition, we have set forth on Appendix III to this
Prospectus Supplement a summary of the base value, maintenance
adjustment and maintenance adjusted base value determined by
each Appraiser with respect to each currently-owned Aircraft.
An appraisal is only an estimate of value. It is not indicative
of the price at which an aircraft may be purchased from the
manufacturer. Nor should it be relied upon as a measure of
realizable value. The proceeds realized upon a sale of any
Aircraft may be less than its appraised value. The value of the
Aircraft in the event of the exercise of remedies under the
applicable Indenture will depend on market and economic
conditions, the availability of buyers, the condition of the
Aircraft and other similar factors. Accordingly, there can be no
assurance that the proceeds realized upon any such exercise with
respect to the Equipment Notes and the Aircraft pursuant to the
applicable Indenture would equal the appraised value of such
Aircraft or be sufficient to satisfy in full payments due on
such Equipment Notes or the Certificates.
Timing of
Financing the Aircraft
The new aircraft that may be financed with the proceeds of this
Offering are scheduled for delivery under Continentals
purchase agreements with The Boeing Company (Boeing)
from January 2010 through June 2010. See the table under
The Appraisals for the scheduled month
of delivery of each such aircraft. Under such purchase
agreements, delivery of an aircraft may be delayed due to
excusable delay, which is defined to include, among
other things, acts of God, governmental acts or failures to act,
strikes or other labor troubles, inability to procure materials,
or any other cause beyond Boeings control or not
occasioned by Boeings fault or negligence.
The other Aircraft expected to be financed with the proceeds of
this Offering are currently owned by Continental and subject to
existing security interests. Such security interests are
scheduled to be discharged prior to June 2010, and each
currently-owned Aircraft will be available for financing under
this Offering once such existing security interest with respect
to such Aircraft has been discharged. In the case of the
currently-owned Aircraft with registration numbers N37253 and
N76254, it is a condition precedent to the obligation of the
Trustees to purchase the Equipment Notes relating to each such
Aircraft under the Note Purchase Agreement that an 8C
Check shall have been performed on such Aircraft after
October 2009 under Continentals maintenance program. An
8C Check is the most extensive inspection and
refurbishment of an aircraft required to be performed on these
Aircraft under Continentals maintenance program.
Continental is planning to have the 8C Checks
performed on these Aircraft prior to June 2010.
The Note Purchase Agreement provides that the period for
financing the Aircraft under this Offering (the Delivery
Period) will expire on August 31, 2010.
If the scheduled delivery date of any new aircraft that may be
financed with the proceeds of this Offering is delayed by more
than 30 days after the month scheduled for delivery,
Continental has the right to replace such aircraft with a
Substitute Aircraft, subject to certain conditions. See
Substitute Aircraft. If delivery of any
such new aircraft is delayed beyond the Delivery Period
Termination Date and Continental does not exercise its right to
replace such aircraft with a Substitute Aircraft, there will be
unused Deposits that will be distributed to Certificateholders
together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon but without a
premium. See Description of the Deposit
Agreements Unused Deposits.
Substitute
Aircraft
If the scheduled delivery date for any new aircraft that may be
financed with the proceeds of this Offering is delayed more than
30 days after the month scheduled for delivery, Continental
may identify for delivery a substitute aircraft (each, together
with the substitute aircraft referred to below, a
Substitute Aircraft) therefor meeting the following
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
A Substitute Aircraft must be of the same model as the aircraft
being replaced.
|
|
|
|
Continental will be obligated to obtain written confirmation
from each Rating Agency that substituting such Substitute
Aircraft for the replaced aircraft will not result in a
withdrawal, suspension or downgrading of the ratings of any
Class of Certificates.
|
S-65
DESCRIPTION
OF THE EQUIPMENT NOTES
The following summary describes the material terms of the
Equipment Notes. The summary makes use of terms defined in, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to all of the
provisions of, the Equipment Notes, the Indentures, the
Participation Agreements and the Note Purchase Agreement, each
of which will be filed as an exhibit to a Current Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission. Except as
otherwise indicated, the following summaries relate to the
Equipment Notes, the Indenture and the Participation Agreement
that may be applicable to each Aircraft.
Under the Note Purchase Agreement, Continental will enter into a
secured debt financing with respect to each Aircraft. The Note
Purchase Agreement provides for the relevant parties to enter
into a Participation Agreement and an Indenture relating to the
financing of each Aircraft.
The description of such financing agreements in this Prospectus
Supplement is based on the forms of such agreements annexed to
the Note Purchase Agreement. However, the terms of the financing
agreements actually entered into may differ from the forms of
such agreements and, consequently, may differ from the
description of such agreements contained in this Prospectus
Supplement. Although such changes are permitted, under the Note
Purchase Agreement the terms of such agreements must not vary
the Required Terms. In addition, Continental will be obligated
to certify to the Trustees that any substantive modifications do
not materially and adversely affect the Certificateholders.
Continental must also obtain written confirmation from each
Rating Agency that the use of financing agreements modified in
any material respect from the forms attached to the Note
Purchase Agreement would not result in a withdrawal, suspension
or downgrading of the ratings of any Class of Certificates. See
Description of the Certificates Obligation to
Purchase Equipment Notes.
General
Equipment Notes will be issued in two series with respect to
each Aircraft (the Series A Equipment Notes and
the Series B Equipment Notes, collectively, the
Equipment Notes). Continental may elect to issue a
single series of Additional Equipment Notes with respect to an
Aircraft at any time, which will be funded from sources other
than this Offering and will be subordinated in right of payment
to the Equipment Notes. See Possible Issuance of
Additional Junior Certificates and Refinancing of
Certificates. The Equipment Notes with respect to each
Aircraft will be issued under a separate Indenture between
Continental and Wilmington Trust Company, as indenture
trustee thereunder (each, a Loan Trustee).
Continentals obligations under the Equipment Notes will be
general obligations of Continental.
Subordination
The Indentures provide for the following subordination
provisions applicable to the Equipment Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Equipment Notes issued in respect of an Aircraft
will rank senior in right of payment to other Equipment Notes
issued in respect of such Aircraft.
|
|
|
|
Series B Equipment Notes issued in respect of an Aircraft
will rank junior in right of payment to the Series A
Equipment Notes issued in respect of such Aircraft.
|
If Continental elects to issue Additional Equipment Notes with
respect to an Aircraft, they will be subordinated in right of
payment to the Series A and Series B Equipment Notes
issued with respect to such Aircraft. See Possible
Issuance of Additional Junior Certificates and Refinancing of
Certificates.
Principal
and Interest Payments
Subject to the provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement,
interest paid on the Equipment Notes held in each Trust will be
passed through to the Certificateholders of such Trust on the
dates and at the rate per annum set forth on the cover page of
this Prospectus Supplement with respect to Certificates issued
by such Trust until the final expected Regular Distribution Date
for such Trust. Subject to the provisions of the Intercreditor
Agreement, principal paid on the Equipment Notes held in each
Trust will be passed through to the Certificateholders of such
S-66
Trust in scheduled amounts on the dates set forth herein until
the final expected Regular Distribution Date for such Trust.
Interest will be payable on the unpaid principal amount of each
Equipment Note at the rate applicable to such Equipment Note on
May 10 and November 10 of each year, commencing on the first
such date to occur after initial issuance thereof. Such interest
will be computed on the basis of a
360-day year
of twelve
30-day
months.
Scheduled principal payments on the Equipment Notes will be made
on May 10 and November 10 in certain years, commencing on
November 10, 2010. See Description of the
Certificates Pool Factors for a discussion of
the scheduled payments of principal of the Equipment Notes and
possible revisions thereto.
If any date scheduled for a payment of principal, premium (if
any) or interest with respect to the Equipment Notes is not a
Business Day, such payment will be made on the next succeeding
Business Day, without any additional interest.
Continental is also required to pay under each Indenture such
Indentures pro rata share of the fees, the interest
payable on drawings under each Liquidity Facility in excess of
earnings on cash deposits from such drawings plus certain other
amounts and certain other payments due to the Liquidity Provider
under each Liquidity Facility and of compensation and certain
expenses payable to the Pass Through Trustee and the
Subordination Agent.
Redemption
If an Event of Loss occurs with respect to an Aircraft and such
Aircraft is not replaced by Continental under the related
Indenture, the Equipment Notes issued with respect to such
Aircraft will be redeemed, in whole, in each case at a price
equal to the aggregate unpaid principal amount thereof, together
with accrued interest thereon to, but not including, the date of
redemption, but without premium, on a Special Distribution Date.
(Indentures, Section 2.10)
All of the Equipment Notes issued with respect to an Aircraft
may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time, at the option of
Continental, provided that all outstanding Equipment Notes
issued with respect to all other Aircraft are simultaneously
redeemed. In addition, Continental may elect to redeem the
Series B Equipment Notes issued with respect to all
Aircraft in connection with a refinancing of such Series. See
Possible Issuance of Additional Junior Certificates and
Refinancing of Certificates. The redemption price in the
case of any optional redemption of Equipment Notes will be equal
to the aggregate unpaid principal amount thereof, together with
accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but not including, the
date of redemption, plus a Make-Whole Premium. (Indentures,
Section 2.11)
Make-Whole Premium means, with respect to any
Equipment Note, an amount (as determined by an independent
investment bank of national standing) equal to the excess, if
any, of (a) the present value of the remaining scheduled
payments of principal and interest to maturity of such Equipment
Note computed by discounting such payments on a semiannual basis
on each payment date under the applicable Indenture (assuming a
360-day year
of twelve
30-day
months) using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Yield plus
the applicable Make-Whole Spread over (b) the outstanding
principal amount of such Equipment Note plus accrued interest to
the date of determination. The Make-Whole Spread
applicable to each Series of Equipment Notes is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make-Whole
|
|
|
Spread
|
|
Series A Equipment Notes
|
|
|
|
%
|
Series B Equipment Notes
|
|
|
|
%
|
For purposes of determining the Make-Whole Premium,
Treasury Yield means, at the date of determination
with respect to any Equipment Note, the interest rate (expressed
as a decimal and, in the case of United States Treasury bills,
converted to a bond equivalent yield) determined to be the per
annum rate equal to the semiannual yield to maturity for United
States Treasury securities maturing on the Average Life Date of
such Equipment Note and trading in the public securities markets
either as determined by interpolation between the most recent
weekly average yield to maturity for two series of United States
Treasury securities trading in the public securities markets,
(A) one maturing as close as possible to, but earlier than,
the Average Life Date of such Equipment Note and (B) the
other maturing as close as possible to, but later than, the
Average Life Date of such Equipment Note, in each case as
S-67
published in the most recent H.15(519) or, if a weekly average
yield to maturity for United States Treasury securities maturing
on the Average Life Date of such Equipment Note is reported in
the most recent H.15(519), such weekly average yield to maturity
as published in such H.15(519). H.15(519) means the
weekly statistical release designated as such, or any successor
publication, published by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System. The date of determination of a Make-Whole
Premium shall be the third Business Day prior to the applicable
payment or redemption date and the most recent
H.15(519) means the H.15(519) published prior to the close
of business on the third Business Day prior to the applicable
payment or redemption date.
Average Life Date for any Equipment Note shall be
the date which follows the time of determination by a period
equal to the Remaining Weighted Average Life of such Equipment
Note. Remaining Weighted Average Life on a given
date with respect to any Equipment Note shall be the number of
days equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (a) the sum
of each of the products obtained by multiplying (i) the
amount of each then remaining scheduled payment of principal of
such Equipment Note by (ii) the number of days from and
including such determination date to but excluding the date on
which such payment of principal is scheduled to be made, by
(b) the then outstanding principal amount of such Equipment
Note.
Security
Aircraft
The Equipment Notes issued with respect to each Aircraft will be
secured by a security interest in such Aircraft and each of the
other Aircraft for which Equipment Notes are outstanding and an
assignment to the Loan Trustee of certain of Continentals
rights under warranties with respect to the Aircraft.
Since the Equipment Notes are cross-collateralized, any proceeds
from the sale of an Aircraft securing Equipment Notes or other
exercise of remedies under an Indenture with respect to such
Aircraft will (subject to the provisions of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code) be available for application to
shortfalls with respect to obligations due under the other
Equipment Notes at the time such proceeds are received. In the
absence of any such shortfall, excess proceeds will be held as
additional collateral by the Loan Trustee under such Indenture
for such other Equipment Notes. However, if an Equipment Note
ceases to be held by the Subordination Agent (as a result of
sale upon the exercise of remedies or otherwise), it ceases to
be entitled to the benefits of cross-collateralization.
See Appendix IV to this Prospectus Supplement for tables
setting forth the projected loan to value ratios for each of the
aircraft that may be financed pursuant to the Offering.
Cash
Cash, if any, held from time to time by the Loan Trustee with
respect to any Aircraft, including funds held as the result of
an Event of Loss to such Aircraft, will be invested and
reinvested by such Loan Trustee, at the direction of
Continental, in investments described in the related Indenture.
(Indentures, Section 6.06)
Limitation
of Liability
Except as otherwise provided in the Indentures, each Loan
Trustee, in its individual capacity, will not be answerable or
accountable under the Indentures or under the Equipment Notes
under any circumstances except, among other things, for its own
willful misconduct or gross negligence. (Indentures,
Section 7.01)
Indenture
Defaults, Notice and Waiver
Events of default under each Indenture (Indenture
Defaults) will include:
|
|
|
|
|
The failure by Continental to pay any amount, when due, under
such Indenture or under any Equipment Note issued thereunder
that continues for more than ten Business Days, in the case of
principal, interest or Make-Whole Premium, and, in all other
cases, ten Business Days after Continental receives written
notice from the related Loan Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Any representation or warranty made by Continental in such
Indenture, the related Participation Agreement or certain
related documents furnished to the Loan Trustee or any holder of
an Equipment Note pursuant
|
S-68
|
|
|
|
|
thereto being false or incorrect in any material respect when
made that continues to be material and adverse to the interests
of the Loan Trustee or Note Holders and remains unremedied after
notice and specified cure periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Failure by Continental to perform or observe any covenant or
obligation for the benefit of the Loan Trustee or holders of
Equipment Notes under such Indenture or certain related
documents that continues after notice and specified cure periods.
|
|
|
|
The lapse or cancellation of insurance required under such
Indenture.
|
|
|
|
The occurrence of an Indenture Default under any other Indenture.
|
|
|
|
The occurrence of certain events of bankruptcy, reorganization
or insolvency of Continental. (Indentures, Section 5.01)
|
The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding
Equipment Notes issued with respect to any Aircraft, by notice
to the Loan Trustee, may on behalf of all the holders waive any
existing default and its consequences under the Indenture with
respect to such Aircraft, except a default in the payment of the
principal of, or premium or interest on any such Equipment Notes
or a default in respect of any covenant or provision of such
Indenture that cannot be modified or amended without the consent
of each holder of Equipment Notes. (Indentures,
Section 5.06) See Description of the Intercreditor
Agreement Voting of Equipment Notes regarding
the persons entitled to direct the vote of Equipment Notes.
Remedies
If an Indenture Default (other than certain events of
bankruptcy, reorganization or insolvency) occurs and is
continuing under an Indenture, the related Loan Trustee or the
holders of a majority in principal amount of the Equipment Notes
outstanding under such Indenture may declare the principal of
all such Equipment Notes issued thereunder immediately due and
payable, together with all accrued but unpaid interest thereon.
If certain events of bankruptcy, reorganization or insolvency
occur with respect to Continental, such amounts shall be due and
payable without any declaration or other act on the part of the
related Loan Trustee or holders of Equipment Notes. The holders
of a majority in principal amount of Equipment Notes outstanding
under an Indenture may rescind any declaration of acceleration
of such Equipment Notes at any time before the judgment or
decree for the payment of the money so due shall be entered if
(i) there has been paid to the related Loan Trustee an
amount sufficient to pay all principal, interest and premium, if
any, on any such Equipment Notes, to the extent such amounts
have become due otherwise than by such declaration of
acceleration and (ii) all other Indenture Defaults and
incipient Indenture Defaults with respect to any covenant or
provision of such Indenture have been cured. (Indentures,
Section 5.02(b))
Each Indenture provides that if an Indenture Default under such
Indenture has occurred and is continuing, the related Loan
Trustee may exercise certain rights or remedies available to it
under such Indenture or under applicable law.
In the case of Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in which
an air carrier is a debtor, Section 1110 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Section 1110)
provides special rights to holders of security interests with
respect to equipment (defined as described below).
Under Section 1110, the right of such holders to take
possession of such equipment in compliance with the provisions
of a security agreement is not affected by any provision of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code or any power of the bankruptcy court.
Such right to take possession may not be exercised for
60 days following the date of commencement of the
reorganization proceedings. Thereafter, such right to take
possession may be exercised during such proceedings unless,
within the
60-day
period or any longer period consented to by the relevant
parties, the debtor agrees to perform its future obligations and
cures all existing and future defaults on a timely basis.
Defaults resulting solely from the financial condition,
bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of the debtor need not
be cured.
Equipment is defined in Section 1110, in part,
as an aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, or spare
part (as defined in Section 40102 of Title 49 of the
U.S. Code) that is subject to a security interest granted
by, leased to, or conditionally sold to a debtor that, at the
time such transaction is entered into, holds an air carrier
operating certificate issued pursuant to chapter 447 of
Title 49 of the U.S. Code for aircraft capable of
carrying ten or more
S-69
individuals or 6,000 pounds or more of cargo. Rights under
Section 1110 are subject to certain limitations in the case
of equipment first placed in service on or prior to
October 22, 1994.
It is a condition to the Trustees obligation to purchase
Equipment Notes with respect to each Aircraft that outside
counsel to Continental, which is expected to be Hughes
Hubbard & Reed LLP, provide its opinion to the
Trustees that the Loan Trustees will be entitled to the benefits
of Section 1110 with respect to the airframe and engines
comprising such Aircraft, assuming that, at the time of such
transaction, Continental holds an air carrier operating
certificate issued pursuant to chapter 447 of Title 49
of the U.S. Code for aircraft capable of carrying ten or
more individuals or 6,000 pounds or more of cargo. For a
description of certain limitations on the Loan Trustees
exercise of rights contained in the Indenture, see
Indenture Defaults, Notice and Waiver.
The opinion of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP will not
address the possible replacement of an Aircraft after an Event
of Loss in the future, the consummation of which is conditioned
upon the contemporaneous delivery of an opinion of counsel to
the effect that the related Loan Trustee will be entitled to
Section 1110 benefits with respect to such replacement
unless there is a change in law or court interpretation that
results in Section 1110 not being available. See
Certain Provisions of the
Indentures Events of Loss. The opinion of
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP will also not address the
availability of Section 1110 with respect to any possible
lessee of an Aircraft if it is leased by Continental.
If an Indenture Default under any Indenture occurs and is
continuing, any sums held or received by the related Loan
Trustee may be applied to reimburse such Loan Trustee for any
tax, expense or other loss incurred by it and to pay any other
amounts due to such Loan Trustee prior to any payments to
holders of the Equipment Notes issued under such Indenture.
(Indentures, Section 3.03)
Modification
of Indentures
Without the consent of holders of a majority in principal amount
of the Equipment Notes outstanding under any Indenture, the
provisions of such Indenture and the related Participation
Agreement may not be amended or modified, except to the extent
indicated below.
Without the consent of the Liquidity Provider and the holder of
each Equipment Note outstanding under any Indenture affected
thereby, no amendment or modification of such Indenture may
among other things (a) reduce the principal amount of, or
premium, if any, or interest payable on, any Equipment Notes
issued under such Indenture or change the date on which any
principal, premium, if any, or interest is due and payable,
(b) permit the creation of any security interest with
respect to the property subject to the lien of such Indenture,
except as provided in such Indenture, or deprive any holder of
an Equipment Note issued under such Indenture of the benefit of
the lien of such Indenture upon the property subject thereto or
(c) modify the percentage of holders of Equipment Notes
issued under such Indenture required to take or approve any
action under such Indenture. (Indentures, Section 10.01(a))
Any Indenture may be amended without the consent of the holders
of Equipment Notes to, among other things, cure any defect or
inconsistency in such Indenture or the Equipment Notes issued
thereunder (provided that such change does not adversely affect
the interests of any such holder) or provide for the re-issuance
thereunder of Series B Equipment Notes or the issuance
thereunder of a single series of Additional Equipment Notes (and
the re-issuance of Series B Equipment Notes or issuance of
Additional Equipment Notes under other Indentures) and any
related credit support arrangements. See Possible Issuance
of Additional Junior Certificates and Refinancing of
Certificates. (Indentures, Section 10.01(b))
Indemnification
Continental will be required to indemnify each Loan Trustee,
each Liquidity Provider, the Subordination Agent, the Escrow
Agent and each Trustee, but not the holders of Certificates, for
certain losses, claims and other matters.
S-70
Certain
Provisions of the Indentures
Maintenance
Continental is obligated under each Indenture, among other
things and at its expense, to keep each Aircraft duly registered
and insured, and to maintain, service, repair and overhaul the
Aircraft so as to keep it in as good an operating condition as
when delivered to Continental, ordinary wear and tear excepted,
and in such condition as required to maintain the airworthiness
certificate for the Aircraft in good standing at all times.
(Indentures, Section 4.02)
Possession,
Lease and Transfer
Each Aircraft may be operated by Continental or, subject to
certain restrictions, by certain other persons. Normal
interchange agreements with respect to the Airframe and normal
interchange, pooling and borrowing agreements with respect to
any Engine, in each case customary in the commercial airline
industry, are permitted. Leases are also permitted to
U.S. air carriers and foreign air carriers that have their
principal executive office in certain specified countries,
subject to a reasonably satisfactory legal opinion that, among
other things, such country would recognize the Loan
Trustees security interest in respect of the applicable
Aircraft. In addition, a lessee may not be subject to insolvency
or similar proceedings at the commencement of such lease.
(Indentures, Section 4.02) Permitted foreign air carriers
are not limited to those based in a country that is a party to
the Convention on the International Recognition of Rights in
Aircraft (Geneva 1948) (the Convention) or the Cape
Town Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment
and the related Aircraft Equipment Protocol (the Cape Town
Treaty). It is uncertain to what extent the relevant Loan
Trustees security interest would be recognized if an
Aircraft is registered or located in a jurisdiction not a party
to the Convention or the Cape Town Treaty . Moreover, in the
case of an Indenture Default, the ability of the related Loan
Trustee to realize upon its security interest in an Aircraft
could be adversely affected as a legal or practical matter if
such Aircraft were registered or located outside the United
States.
Registration
Continental is required to keep each Aircraft duly registered
under the Transportation Code with the FAA and to record each
Indenture and certain other documents under the Transportation
Code. In addition, Continental is required to register the
international interests created pursuant to the
Indenture under the Cape Town Treaty. (Indentures,
Section 4.02(e)) Such recordation of the Indenture and
certain other documents with respect to each Aircraft will give
the relevant Loan Trustee a first-priority, perfected security
interest in such Aircraft under U.S. law. If such Aircraft
is located outside the United States, under U.S. law the
effect of such perfection and the priority of such security
interest will be governed by the law of the jurisdiction where
such Aircraft is located. The Convention provides that such
security interest will be recognized, with certain limited
exceptions, in those jurisdictions that have ratified or adhere
to the Convention. The Cape Town Treaty provides that a
registered international interest has priority over
a subsequently registered interest and over an unregistered
interest for purposes of the law of those jurisdictions that
have ratified the Cape Town Treaty. There are many jurisdictions
in the world that have not ratified either the Convention or the
Cape Town Treaty, and the Aircraft may be located in any such
jurisdiction from time to time.
So long as no Indenture Default exists, Continental has the
right to register any Aircraft in a country other than the
United States at its own expense in connection with a permitted
lease of the Aircraft to a permitted foreign air carrier,
subject to certain conditions set forth in the related
Indenture. These conditions include a requirement that an
opinion of counsel be provided that the lien of the applicable
Indenture will continue as a first priority security interest in
the applicable Aircraft. (Indentures, Section 4.02(e)).
Liens
Continental is required to maintain each Aircraft free of any
liens, other than the rights of the relevant Loan Trustee, the
holders of the Equipment Notes and Continental arising under the
applicable Indenture or the other operative documents related
thereto, and other than certain limited liens permitted under
such documents, including but not limited to (i) liens for
taxes either not yet due or being contested in good faith by
appropriate proceedings;
S-71
(ii) materialmens, mechanics and other similar
liens arising in the ordinary course of business and securing
obligations that either are not yet delinquent for more than
60 days or are being contested in good faith by appropriate
proceedings; (iii) judgment liens so long as such judgment
is discharged or vacated within 60 days or the execution of
such judgment is stayed pending appeal or discharged, vacated or
reversed within 60 days after expiration of such stay; and
(iv) any other lien as to which Continental has provided a
bond or other security adequate in the reasonable opinion of the
Loan Trustee; provided that in the case of each of the liens
described in the foregoing clauses (i), (ii) and (iii),
such liens and proceedings do not involve any material risk of
the sale, forfeiture or loss of such Aircraft or the interest of
the Loan Trustee therein or impair the lien of the relevant
Indenture. (Indentures, Section 4.01)
Replacement
of Parts; Alterations
Continental is obligated to replace all parts at its expense
that may from time to time be incorporated or installed in or
attached to any Aircraft and that may become lost, damaged
beyond repair, worn out, stolen, seized, confiscated or rendered
permanently unfit for use. Continental or any permitted lessee
has the right, at its own expense, to make such alterations,
modifications and additions with respect to each Aircraft as it
deems desirable in the proper conduct of its business and to
remove parts which it deems to be obsolete or no longer suitable
or appropriate for use, so long as such alteration,
modification, addition or removal does not materially diminish
the fair market value, utility, condition or useful life of the
related Aircraft or Engine or invalidate the Aircrafts
airworthiness certificate. (Indentures, Section 4.04(d))
Insurance
Continental is required to maintain, at its expense (or at the
expense of a permitted lessee), all-risk aircraft hull insurance
covering each Aircraft, at all times in an amount not less than
the unpaid principal amount of the Equipment Notes relating to
such Aircraft together with six months of interest accrued
thereon (the Debt Balance). However, after giving
effect to self-insurance permitted as described below, the
amount payable under such insurance may be less than such
amounts payable with respect to the Equipment Notes. In the
event of a loss involving insurance proceeds in excess of
$10,000,000 per occurrence in the case of a Boeing
777-224ER
Aircraft, $7,500,000 per occurrence in the case of a Boeing
767-424ER or
757-224
Aircraft and $5,000,000 per occurrence in the case of a Boeing
737-824
Aircraft, such proceeds up to the Debt Balance of the relevant
Aircraft will be payable to the applicable Loan Trustee, for so
long as the relevant Indenture shall be in effect. In the event
of a loss involving insurance proceeds of up to $5,000,000 per
occurrence, such proceeds will be payable directly to
Continental so long as no Indenture Default exists under the
related Indenture. So long as the loss does not constitute an
Event of Loss, insurance proceeds will be applied to repair or
replace the property. (Indentures, Section 4.06 and
Annex B)
In addition, Continental is obligated to maintain comprehensive
airline liability insurance at its expense (or at the expense of
a permitted lessee), including, without limitation, passenger
liability, baggage liability, cargo and mail liability,
hangarkeepers liability and contractual liability
insurance with respect to each Aircraft. Such liability
insurance must be underwritten by insurers of nationally or
internationally recognized responsibility. The amount of such
liability insurance coverage per occurrence may not be less than
the amount of comprehensive airline liability insurance from
time to time applicable to aircraft owned or leased and operated
by Continental of the same type and operating on similar routes
as such Aircraft. (Indentures, Section 4.06 and
Annex B)
Continental is also required to maintain war-risk, hijacking and
allied perils insurance if it (or any permitted lessee) operates
any Aircraft, Airframe or Engine in any area of recognized
hostilities or if Continental (or any permitted lessee)
maintains such insurance with respect to other aircraft operated
on the same international routes or areas on or in which the
Aircraft is operated. (Indentures, Section 4.06 and
Annex B)
Continental may self-insure under a program applicable to all
aircraft in its fleet, but the amount of such self-insurance in
the aggregate may not exceed 50% of the largest replacement
value of any single aircraft in Continentals fleet or
11/2%
of the average aggregate insurable value (during the preceding
policy year) of all aircraft on which Continental carries
insurance, whichever is less, unless an insurance broker of
national standing shall certify that the standard among all
other major U.S. airlines is a higher level of
self-insurance, in which case Continental may self-insure the
Aircraft to such higher level. In addition, Continental may
self-insure to the extent
S-72
of any applicable deductible per Aircraft that does not exceed
industry standards for major U.S. airlines. (Indentures,
Section 4.06 and Annex B)
In respect of each Aircraft, Continental is required to name as
additional insured parties the Loan Trustees, the holders of the
Equipment Notes and the Liquidity Provider under all liability,
hull and property and war risk, hijacking and allied perils
insurance policies required with respect to such Aircraft. In
addition, the insurance policies will be required to provide
that, in respect of the interests of such additional insured
persons, the insurance shall not be invalidated or impaired by
any act or omission of Continental, any permitted lessee or any
other person. (Indentures, Section 4.06 and Annex B)
Events
of Loss
If an Event of Loss occurs with respect to the Airframe or the
Airframe and Engines of an Aircraft, Continental must elect
within 45 days after such occurrence either to make payment
with respect to such Event of Loss or to replace such Airframe
and any such Engines. Not later than the first Business Day
following the earlier of (i) the 120th day following
the date of occurrence of such Event of Loss, and (ii) the
fourth Business Day following the receipt of the insurance
proceeds in respect of such Event of Loss, Continental must
either (i) pay to the Loan Trustee the outstanding
principal amount of the Equipment Notes, together with certain
additional amounts, but, in any case, without any Make-Whole
Premium or (ii) unless an Indenture Default or failure to
pay principal or interest under the Indenture or certain
bankruptcy defaults shall have occurred and is continuing,
substitute an airframe (or airframe and one or more engines, as
the case may be) for the Airframe, or Airframe and Engine(s),
that suffered such Event of Loss. (Indentures,
Sections 2.10 and 4.05(a))
If Continental elects to replace an Airframe (or Airframe and
one or more Engines, as the case may be) that suffered such
Event of Loss, it shall subject such an airframe (or airframe
and one or more engines) to the lien of the Indenture, and such
replacement airframe or airframe and engines must be the same
model as the Airframe or Airframe and Engines to be replaced or
an improved model, with a value, utility and remaining useful
life (without regard to hours or cycles remaining until the next
regular maintenance check) at least equal to the Airframe or
Airframe and Engines to be replaced, assuming that such Airframe
and such Engines had been maintained in accordance with the
related Indenture. Continental is also required to provide to
the relevant Loan Trustee reasonably acceptable opinions of
counsel to the effect, among other things, that (i) certain
specified documents have been duly filed under the
Transportation Code and (ii) such Loan Trustee will be
entitled to receive the benefits of Section 1110 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code with respect to any such replacement
airframe (unless, as a result of a change in law or court
interpretation, such benefits are not then available).
(Indentures, Section 4.05(c))
If Continental elects not to replace such Airframe, or Airframe
and Engine(s), then upon payment of the outstanding principal
amount of the Equipment Notes issued with respect to such
Aircraft, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon and
all additional amounts then due and unpaid with respect to such
Aircraft, the lien of the Indenture shall terminate with respect
to such Aircraft, and the obligation of Continental thereafter
to make interest and principal payments with respect thereto
shall cease. (Indentures, Sections 2.10, 3.02 and
4.05(a)(ii))
If an Event of Loss occurs with respect to an Engine alone,
Continental will be required to replace such Engine within
60 days after the occurrence of such Event of Loss with
another engine, free and clear of all liens (other than certain
permitted liens). Such replacement engine shall be the same make
and model as the Engine to be replaced, or an improved model,
suitable for installation and use on the Airframe, and having a
value, utility and remaining useful life (without regard to
hours or cycles remaining until overhaul) at least equal to the
Engine to be replaced, assuming that such Engine had been
maintained in accordance with the relevant Indenture.
(Indentures, Section 4.05)
An Event of Loss with respect to an Aircraft,
Airframe or any Engine means any of the following events with
respect to such property:
|
|
|
|
|
The destruction of such property, damage to such property beyond
economic repair or rendition of such property permanently unfit
for normal use.
|
S-73
|
|
|
|
|
The actual or constructive total loss of such property or any
damage to such property or requisition of title or use of such
property which results in an insurance settlement with respect
to such property on the basis of a total loss or a constructive
or compromised total loss.
|
|
|
|
Any theft, hijacking or disappearance of such property for a
period of 180 consecutive days or more.
|
|
|
|
Any seizure, condemnation, confiscation, taking or requisition
of title to such property by any governmental entity or
purported governmental entity (other than a U.S. government
entity) for a period exceeding 180 consecutive days.
|
|
|
|
As a result of any law, rule, regulation, order or other action
by the FAA or any governmental entity, the use of such property
in the normal course of Continentals business of passenger
air transportation is prohibited for 180 consecutive days,
unless Continental, prior to the expiration of such
180-day
period, shall have undertaken and shall be diligently carrying
forward steps which are necessary or desirable to permit the
normal use of such property by Continental, but in any event if
such use shall have been prohibited for a period of two
consecutive years, provided that no Event of Loss shall be
deemed to have occurred if such prohibition has been applicable
to Continentals entire U.S. registered fleet of
similar property and Continental, prior to the expiration of
such two-year period, shall have conformed at least one unit of
such property in its fleet to the requirements of any such law,
rule, regulation, order or other action and commenced regular
commercial use of the same and shall be diligently carrying
forward, in a manner which does not discriminate against
applicable property in so conforming such property, steps which
are necessary or desirable to permit the normal use of such
property by Continental, but in any event if such use shall have
been prohibited for a period of three years.
|
|
|
|
With respect to any Engine, any divestiture of title to such
Engine in connection with pooling or certain other arrangements
shall be treated as an Event of Loss. (Indentures, Annex A)
|
POSSIBLE
ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CERTIFICATES AND
REFINANCING OF CERTIFICATES
Issuance
of Additional Junior Certificates
Continental may elect to issue a single additional series of
equipment notes (the Additional Equipment Notes) at
any time after the Delivery Period Termination Date with respect
to any Aircraft, which will be funded from sources other than
this offering (the Offering) but will be issued
under the same Indenture as the Equipment Notes for such
Aircraft. Any Additional Equipment Note issued under an
Indenture will be subordinated in right of payment to the
Series A and Series B Equipment Notes issued under
such Indenture. Continental will fund the sale of any Additional
Equipment Notes through the sale of pass through certificates
(the Additional Junior Certificates) issued by a
single Continental Airlines pass through trust (an
Additional Trust). There will be no liquidity
facility with respect to Additional Junior Certificates.
The Trustee of any Additional Trust (the Additional
Trustee) will become a party to the Intercreditor
Agreement, and the Intercreditor Agreement will be amended by
written agreement of Continental and the Subordination Agent to
provide for the subordination of the Additional Junior
Certificates to the Administration Expenses, the Liquidity
Obligations and the Class A and Class B Certificates.
The priority of distributions under the Intercreditor Agreement
may be revised, however, to provide for distribution of
Adjusted Interest with respect to the Additional
Junior Certificates (calculated in a manner substantially
similar to the calculation of Class B Adjusted Interest)
after Class B Adjusted Interest, but before Expected
Distributions on the Class A Certificates.
The holders of Additional Junior Certificates will have the
right to purchase all of the Class A and B Certificates
under certain circumstances after a bankruptcy of Continental.
See Description of the Certificates Purchase
Rights of Certificateholders. In addition, the Additional
Trustee will be the Controlling Party upon payment of Final
Distributions to the holders of the Class B Certificates,
subject to the rights of the Liquidity Providers to be the
Controlling Party under certain circumstances. See
Description of the Intercreditor Agreement
Intercreditor Rights.
S-74
Any such issuance of Additional Equipment Notes and Additional
Junior Certificates, and any such amendment of the Intercreditor
Agreement (and any amendment of an Indenture in connection with
such issuance) is contingent upon each Rating Agency providing
written confirmation that such actions will not result in a
withdrawal, suspension, or downgrading of the rating of any
Class of Certificates.
Refinancing
of Certificates
Continental may elect to redeem and re-issue Series B
Equipment Notes then outstanding (any such re-issued Equipment
Notes, the Refinancing Equipment Notes) in respect
of all (but not less than all) of the Aircraft. In such case,
Continental will fund the sale of such Refinancing Equipment
Notes through the sale of pass through certificates (the
Refinancing Certificates) issued by a Continental
Airlines pass through trust (the Refinancing Trust).
The Refinancing Certificates relating to the refinanced
Series B Equipment Notes may have the benefit of a
liquidity facility.
The Trustee of the Refinancing Trust will become a party to the
Intercreditor Agreement, and the Intercreditor Agreement will be
amended by written agreement of Continental and the
Subordination Agent to provide for the subordination of the
Refinancing Certificates to the Administration Expenses, the
Liquidity Obligations and the Class A Certificates in the
same manner that the refinanced Class B Certificates were
subordinated. Such issuance of Refinancing Equipment Notes and
Refinancing Certificates, and any such amendment of the
Intercreditor Agreement (and any amendment of an Indenture in
connection with such re-issuance) is contingent upon each Rating
Agency providing written confirmation that such actions will not
result in a withdrawal, suspension, or downgrading of the rating
of any Class of Certificates that remains outstanding.
S-75
The following summary describes all material generally
applicable U.S. federal income tax consequences to
Certificateholders of the purchase, ownership and disposition of
the Certificates and in the opinion of Hughes
Hubbard & Reed LLP, special tax counsel to Continental
(Tax Counsel), is accurate in all material respects
with respect to the matters discussed therein. Except as
otherwise specified, the summary is addressed to beneficial
owners of Certificates that are citizens or residents of the
United States, corporations created or organized in or under the
laws of the United States or any state therein or the District
of Columbia, estates the income of which is subject to
U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or
trusts that meet the following two tests: (a) a
U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the
administration of the trust and (b) one or more
U.S. fiduciaries have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust
(U.S. Persons) that will hold the Certificates
as capital assets (U.S. Certificateholders).
This summary does not address the tax treatment of
U.S. Certificateholders that may be subject to special tax
rules, such as banks, insurance companies, dealers in securities
or commodities, partnerships, holders subject to the
mark-to-market
rules, tax-exempt entities, holders that will hold Certificates
as part of a straddle or holders that have a functional
currency other than the U.S. Dollar, nor, except as
otherwise specified, does it address the tax treatment of
U.S. Certificateholders that do not acquire Certificates at
the public offering price as part of the initial offering. The
summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of
all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision
to purchase Certificates. This summary does not describe any tax
consequences arising under the laws of any state, locality or
taxing jurisdiction other than the United States.
The summary is based upon the tax laws and practice of the
United States as in effect on the date of this Prospectus
Supplement, as well as judicial and administrative
interpretations thereof (in final or proposed form) available on
or before such date. All of the foregoing are subject to change,
which change could apply retroactively. We have not sought any
ruling from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS) with respect to the tax consequences described
below, and we cannot assure you that the IRS will not take
contrary positions. The Trusts are not indemnified for any
U.S. federal income taxes that may be imposed upon them,
and the imposition of any such taxes on a Trust could result in
a reduction in the amounts available for distribution to the
Certificateholders of such Trust. Prospective investors
should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the
federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences to them of
the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Certificates.
Tax
Status of the Trusts
In the opinion of Tax Counsel, while there is no authority
addressing the characterization of entities that are similar to
the Trusts in all material respects, each of the Original Trusts
should be classified as a grantor trust for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. If, as may be the case, the Original Trusts
are not classified as grantor trusts, they will, in the opinion
of Tax Counsel, be classified as partnerships for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and will not be classified
as publicly traded partnerships taxable as corporations provided
that at least 90% of each Original Trusts gross income for
each taxable year of its existence is qualifying
income (which is defined to include, among other things,
interest income, gain from the sale or disposition of capital
assets held for the production of interest income, and income
derived with respect to a business of investing in securities).
Tax Counsel believes that income derived by the Original Trusts
from the Equipment Notes will constitute qualifying income and
that the Trusts therefore will meet the 90% test described
above, assuming that the Original Trusts operate in accordance
with the terms of the Pass Through Trust Agreements and
other agreements to which they are parties. In the opinion of
Tax Counsel, the Successor Trusts will be classified as grantor
trusts.
Taxation
of Certificateholders Generally
Trusts
Classified as Grantor Trusts
Assuming that a Trust is classified as a grantor trust, a
U.S. Certificateholder will be treated as owning its pro
rata undivided interest in the relevant Deposits and each of the
Equipment Notes held by the Trust, the Trusts contractual
rights and obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement, and
any other property held by the Trust.
S-76
Accordingly, each U.S. Certificateholders share of
interest paid on Equipment Notes will be taxable as ordinary
income, as it is paid or accrued, in accordance with such
U.S. Certificateholders method of accounting for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, and a
U.S. Certificateholders share of premium, if any,
paid on redemption of an Equipment Note will be treated as
capital gain. The Deposits will likely be subject to the
short-term obligation rules, with the result that a
U.S. Certificateholder using the cash method of accounting
will be required to defer interest deductions with respect to
the debt incurred to purchase or carry an interest in a Deposit
unless the U.S. Certificateholder elects to include income
from the Deposit using the accrual method of accounting. Any
amounts received by a Trust under a Liquidity Facility in order
to make interest payments will be treated for U.S. federal
income tax purposes as having the same characteristics as the
payments they replace.
In the case of a subsequent purchaser of a Certificate, the
purchase price for the Certificate should be allocated among the
relevant Deposits and the assets held by the relevant Trust
(including the Equipment Notes and the rights and obligations
under the Note Purchase Agreement with respect to Equipment
Notes not theretofore issued) in accordance with their relative
fair market values at the time of purchase. Any portion of the
purchase price allocable to the right and obligation under the
Note Purchase Agreement to acquire an Equipment Note should be
included in the purchasers basis in its share of the
Equipment Note when issued. Although the matter is not entirely
clear, in the case of a purchaser after initial issuance of the
Certificates but prior to the Delivery Period Termination Date,
if the purchase price reflects a negative value
associated with the obligation to acquire an Equipment Note
pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement being burdensome under
conditions existing at the time of purchase (e.g., as a result
of the interest rate on the unissued Equipment Notes being below
market at the time of purchase of a Certificate), such negative
value probably would be added to such purchasers basis in
its interest in the Deposits and the remaining assets of the
Trust and reduce such purchasers basis in its share of the
Equipment Notes when issued. The preceding two sentences do not
apply to purchases of Certificates following the Delivery Period
Termination Date.
A U.S. Certificateholder who is treated as purchasing an
interest in a Deposit or an Equipment Note at a market discount
(generally, at a cost less than its remaining principal amount)
that exceeds a statutorily defined de minimis amount will be
subject to the market discount rules of the Code.
These rules provide, in part, that gain on the sale or other
disposition of a debt instrument with a term of more than one
year and partial principal payments (including partial
redemptions) on such a debt instrument are treated as ordinary
income to the extent of accrued but unrecognized market
discount. The market discount rules also provide for deferral of
interest deductions with respect to debt incurred to purchase or
carry a debt instrument that has market discount. A
U.S. Certificateholder who purchases an interest in an
Equipment Note at a premium may elect to amortize the premium as
an offset to interest income on the Equipment Note under rules
prescribed by the Code and Treasury regulations promulgated
under the Code.
Each U.S. Certificateholder will be entitled to deduct,
consistent with its method of accounting, its pro rata share of
fees and expenses paid or incurred by the corresponding Trust as
provided in Section 162 or 212 of the Code. Certain fees
and expenses, including fees paid to the Trustee and the
Liquidity Provider, will be borne by parties other than the
Certificateholders. It is possible that such fees and expenses
will be treated as constructively received by the Trust, in
which event a U.S. Certificateholder will be required to
include in income and will be entitled to deduct its pro rata
share of such fees and expenses. If a
U.S. Certificateholder is an individual, estate or trust,
the deduction for such holders share of such fees or
expenses will be allowed only to the extent that all of such
holders miscellaneous itemized deductions, including such
holders share of such fees and expenses, exceed 2% of such
holders adjusted gross income. In addition, in the case of
U.S. Certificateholders who are individuals, certain
otherwise allowable itemized deductions will be subject
generally to additional limitations on itemized deductions under
applicable provisions of the Code.
Original
Trusts Classified as Partnerships
If an Original Trust is classified as a partnership (and not as
a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation) for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, income or loss with
respect to the assets held by the Trust will be calculated at
the Trust level, but the Trust itself will not be subject to
U.S. federal income tax. A U.S. Certificateholder
would be required to report its share of the Trusts items
of income and deduction on its tax return for its taxable year
within which the Trusts taxable year (which should be a
calendar year) ends as well as income from its
S-77
interest in the relevant Deposits. A
U.S. Certificateholders basis in its interest in the
Trust would be equal to its purchase price therefor including
its share of any funds withdrawn from the Depositary and used to
purchase Equipment Notes, plus its share of the Trusts net
income, minus its share of any net losses of the Trust, and
minus the amount of any distributions from the Trust. In the
case of an original purchaser of a Certificate that is a
calendar year taxpayer, income or loss generally should be the
same as it would be if the Trust were classified as a grantor
trust, except that income or loss would be reported on an
accrual basis even if the U.S. Certificateholder otherwise
uses the cash method of accounting. A subsequent purchaser,
however, generally would be subject to tax on the same basis as
an original holder with respect to its interest in the Original
Trust, and would not be subject to the market discount rules or
the bond premium rules during the duration of the Original
Trust, except that it is possible that, in the case of a
subsequent purchaser that purchases Certificates at a time when
the total adjusted tax basis of the Trusts assets exceeds
their fair market value by more than $250,000, taxable income
would be computed as if the adjusted basis of the Trusts
assets were reduced by the amount of such excess.
Effect of
Reallocation of Payments under the Intercreditor
Agreement
In the event that the Class B Trust receives less than the
full amount of the interest, principal or premium paid with
respect to the Equipment Notes held by it because of the
subordination of the Class B Trust under the Intercreditor
Agreement, the corresponding owners of beneficial interests in
the Class B Certificates would probably be treated for
federal income tax purposes as if they had:
|
|
|
|
|
received as distributions their full share of interest,
principal or premium;
|
|
|
|
paid over to the holders of Class A Certificates an amount
equal to their share of the amount of the shortfall; and
|
|
|
|
retained the right to reimbursement of the amount of the
shortfall to the extent of future amounts payable to them on
account of the shortfall.
|
Under this analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Certificateholders incurring a shortfall would be
required to include as current income any interest or other
income of the Class B Trust that was a component of the
shortfall, even though that amount was in fact paid to the
holders of Class A Certificates;
|
|
|
|
a loss would only be allowed to Class B Certificateholders
when their right to receive reimbursement of the shortfall
becomes worthless; that is, when it becomes clear that funds
will not be available from any source to reimburse the
shortfall; and
|
|
|
|
reimbursement of the shortfall before a claim of worthlessness
would not be taxable income to the Class B
Certificateholders because the amount reimbursed would have been
previously included in income.
|
These results should not significantly affect the inclusion of
income for Class B Certificateholders on the accrual method
of accounting, but could accelerate inclusion of income to
Class B Certificateholders on the cash method of accounting
by, in effect, placing them on the accrual method.
Assuming that the Original Trusts are classified as grantor
trusts, the dissolution of an Original Trust and distribution of
interests in the related Successor Trust will not be a taxable
event to U.S. Certificateholders, who will continue to be
treated as owning their shares of the property transferred from
the Original Trust to the Successor Trust. If the Original
Trusts are classified as partnerships, a
U.S. Certificateholder will be deemed to receive its share
of the Equipment Notes and any other property transferred by the
Original Trust to the Successor Trust in liquidation of its
interest in the Original Trust in a non-taxable transaction. In
such case, the U.S. Certificateholders basis in the
property so received will be equal to its basis in its interest
in the Original Trust, allocated among the various assets
received based upon their bases in the hands of the Original
Trust and any unrealized appreciation or depreciation in value
in such assets, and the U.S. Certificateholders
holding period for the Equipment Notes and other property will
include the Original Trusts holding period.
S-78
Sale or
Other Disposition of the Certificates
Upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of a Certificate, a
U.S. Certificateholder generally will recognize capital
gain or loss (subject to the possible recognition of ordinary
income under the market discount rules) equal to the difference
between the amount realized on the disposition (other than any
amount attributable to accrued interest which will be taxable as
ordinary income and any amount attributable to any Deposits) and
the U.S. Certificateholders adjusted tax basis in the
Note Purchase Agreement, Equipment Notes and any other property
held by the corresponding Trust. Any such gain or loss will be
long-term capital gain or loss to the extent attributable to
property held by the Trust for more than one year. In the case
of individuals, estates and trusts, the maximum rate of tax on
net long-term capital gains generally is 15%. After
December 31, 2010, this maximum rate is scheduled to return
to the previous maximum rate of 20%. Any gain with respect to an
interest in a Deposit will likely be treated as ordinary income.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Original Trusts are
classified as partnerships, gain or loss with respect to a
disposition of an interest in an Original Trust will be
calculated and characterized by reference to the
U.S. Certificateholders adjusted tax basis and
holding period for its interest in the Original Trust.
Foreign
Certificateholders
Subject to the discussion of backup withholding below, payments
of principal and interest on the Equipment Notes to, or on
behalf of, any beneficial owner of a Certificate that is for
U.S. federal income tax purposes a nonresident alien (other
than certain former United States citizens or residents),
foreign corporation, foreign trust, or foreign estate (a
non-U.S. Certificateholder)
will not be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax
provided that:
|
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. Certificateholder
does not actually or constructively own 10% or more of the total
combined voting power of all classes of stock of Continental;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. Certificateholder
is not a bank receiving interest pursuant to a loan agreement
entered into in the ordinary course of its trade or business, or
a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. tax purposes that
is related to Continental; and
|
|
|
|
certain certification requirements (including identification of
the beneficial owner of the Certificate) are complied with.
|
Any capital gain realized upon the sale, exchange, retirement or
other disposition of a Certificate or upon receipt of premium
paid on an Equipment Note by a
non-U.S. Certificateholder
will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding
taxes if (i) such gain is not effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business of the holder and (ii) in the
case of an individual, such holder is not present in the United
States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the
sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition or receipt.
Backup
Withholding
Payments made on the Certificates and proceeds from the sale of
Certificates will not be subject to a backup withholding tax
(currently at the rate of 28%) unless, in general, the
Certificateholder fails to comply with certain reporting
procedures or otherwise fails to establish an exemption from
such tax under applicable provisions of the Code.
S-79
CERTAIN
DELAWARE TAXES
The Trustee is a Delaware banking corporation with its corporate
trust office in Delaware. In the opinion of Richards,
Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Delaware, counsel to the
Trustee, under currently applicable law, assuming that the
Trusts will not be taxable as corporations, but, rather, will be
classified as grantor trusts under subpart E, Part I of
Subchapter J of the Code or as partnerships under Subchapter K
of the Code, (i) the Trusts will not be subject to any tax
(including, without limitation, net or gross income, tangible or
intangible property, net worth, capital, franchise or doing
business tax), fee or other governmental charge under the laws
of the State of Delaware or any political subdivision thereof
and (ii) Certificateholders that are not residents of or
otherwise subject to tax in Delaware will not be subject to any
tax (including, without limitation, net or gross income,
tangible or intangible property, net worth, capital, franchise
or doing business tax), fee or other governmental charge under
the laws of the State of Delaware or any political subdivision
thereof as a result of purchasing, holding (including receiving
payments with respect to) or selling a Certificate.
Neither the Trusts nor the Certificateholders will be
indemnified for any state or local taxes imposed on them, and
the imposition of any such taxes on a Trust could result in a
reduction in the amounts available for distribution to the
Certificateholders of such Trust. In general, should a
Certificateholder or any Trust be subject to any state or local
tax which would not be imposed if the Trustee were located in a
different jurisdiction in the United States, the Trustee will
resign and a new Trustee in such other jurisdiction will be
appointed.
S-80
CERTAIN
ERISA CONSIDERATIONS
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA), imposes certain requirements on employee
benefit plans subject to Title I of ERISA (ERISA
Plans), and on those persons who are fiduciaries with
respect to ERISA Plans. Investments by ERISA Plans are subject
to ERISAs general fiduciary requirements, including, but
not limited to, the requirement of investment prudence and
diversification and the requirement that an ERISA Plans
investments be made in accordance with the documents governing
the Plan.
Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code
prohibit certain transactions involving the assets of an ERISA
Plan (as well as those plans that are not subject to ERISA but
which are subject to Section 4975 of the Code, such as
individual retirement accounts (together with ERISA Plans,
Plans)) and certain persons (referred to as
parties in interest or disqualified
persons) having certain relationships to such Plans,
unless a statutory or administrative exemption is applicable to
the transaction. A party in interest or disqualified person who
engages in a prohibited transaction may be subject to excise
taxes and other penalties and liabilities under ERISA and the
Code.
The Department of Labor has promulgated a regulation,
29 CFR
Section 2510.3-101
(the Plan Asset Regulation), describing what
constitutes the assets of a Plan with respect to the Plans
investment in an entity for purposes of ERISA and
Section 4975 of the Code. Under the Plan Asset Regulation,
if a Plan invests (directly or indirectly) in a Certificate, the
Plans assets will include both the Certificate and an
undivided interest in each of the underlying assets of the
corresponding Trust, including the Equipment Notes held by such
Trust, unless it is established that equity participation in
such Trust by benefit plan investors (including but not limited
to Plans and entities whose underlying assets include Plan
assets by reason of an employee benefit plans investment
in the entity) is not significant within the meaning
of the Plan Asset Regulation. In this regard, the extent to
which there is equity participation in a particular Trust by, or
on behalf of, employee benefit plans will not be monitored. If
the assets of a Trust are deemed to constitute the assets of a
Plan, transactions involving the assets of such Trust could be
subject to the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and
Section 4975 of the Code unless a statutory or
administrative exemption is applicable to the transaction.
The fiduciary of a Plan that proposes to purchase and hold any
Certificates should consider, among other things, whether such
purchase and holding may involve (i) the direct or indirect
extension of credit to a party in interest or a disqualified
person, (ii) the sale or exchange of any property between a
Plan and a party in interest or a disqualified person, and
(iii) the transfer to, or use by or for the benefit of, a
party in interest or a disqualified person, of any Plan assets.
Such parties in interest or disqualified persons could include,
without limitation, Continental and its affiliates, the
Underwriters, the Loan Trustee, the Escrow Agent, the
Depositary, the Trustee and the Liquidity Provider. In addition,
if Certificates are purchased by a Plan and Certificates of a
subordinate Class are held by a party in interest or a
disqualified person with respect to such Plan, the exercise by
the holder of the subordinate Class of Certificates of its right
to purchase the senior Classes of Certificates upon the
occurrence and during the continuation of a Triggering Event
could be considered to constitute a prohibited transaction
unless a statutory or administrative exemption were applicable.
Depending on the identity of the Plan fiduciary making the
decision to acquire or hold Certificates on behalf of a Plan,
Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption (PTCE)
91-38
(relating to investments by bank collective investment funds),
PTCE 84-14
(relating to transactions effected by a qualified
professional asset manager),
PTCE 95-60
(relating to investments by an insurance company general
account),
PTCE 96-23
(relating to transactions directed by an in-house professional
asset manager) or
PTCE 90-1
(relating to investments by insurance company pooled separate
accounts) (collectively, the Class Exemptions) could
provide an exemption from the prohibited transaction provisions
of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. However, there can
be no assurance that any of these Class Exemptions or any other
exemption will be available with respect to any particular
transaction involving the Certificates.
In addition to the Class Exemptions referred to above, an
individual exemption may apply to the purchase, holding and
secondary market sale of Class A Certificates by Plans,
provided that certain specified conditions are met. In
particular, the Department of Labor has issued individual
administrative exemptions to each of the Underwriters which are
substantially the same as the administrative exemptions issued
to Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Prohibited
Transaction
Exemption 90-24
(55 Fed. Reg. 20,548 (1990)), as amended (together, the
Underwriter Exemption). The Underwriter Exemption
generally exempts from the application of certain, but not all,
of the prohibited transaction provisions of Section 406 of
ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code certain
S-81
transactions relating to the initial purchase, holding and
subsequent secondary market sale of pass through certificates
which represent an interest in a trust that holds secured credit
instruments that bear interest or are purchased at a discount in
transactions by or between business entities (including
equipment notes secured by aircraft or leases of aircraft) and
certain other assets, provided that certain conditions set forth
in the Underwriter Exemption are satisfied.
The Underwriter Exemption sets forth a number of general and
specific conditions which must be satisfied for a transaction
involving the initial purchase, holding or secondary market sale
of certificates representing a beneficial ownership interest in
a trust to be eligible for exemptive relief thereunder. In
particular, the Underwriter Exemption requires that the
acquisition of certificates by a Plan be on terms that are at
least as favorable to the Plan as they would be in an
arms-length transaction with an unrelated party; the
rights and interests evidenced by the certificates not be
subordinated to the rights and interests evidenced by other
certificates of the same trust estate; the certificates at the
time of acquisition by the Plan be rated in one of the three
highest generic rating categories by Moodys,
Standard & Poors, Duff & Phelps Inc.,
Fitch Investors Service, Inc. or DBRS; and the investing Plan be
an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501(a)(1) of
Regulation D of the Commission under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
In addition, the trust corpus generally must be invested in
qualifying receivables, such as the Equipment Notes, but may not
in general include a pre-funding account (except for a limited
amount of pre-funding which is invested in qualifying
receivables within a limited period of time following the
closing not to exceed three months). With respect to the
investment restrictions set forth in the Underwriter Exemption,
an investment in a Class A Certificate will evidence both
an interest in the respective Original Trust as well as an
interest in the Deposits held in escrow by the Escrow Agent for
the benefit of the Certificateholder. Under the terms of the
Escrow Agreements, the proceeds from the Offering of the
Certificates of each Class will be paid over by the Underwriters
to the Depositary on behalf of the Escrow Agent (for the benefit
of such Certificateholders as the holders of the Escrow
Receipts) and will not constitute property of the Trusts. Under
the terms of each Escrow Agreement, the Escrow Agent will be
irrevocably instructed to enter into the corresponding Deposit
Agreement with the Depositary and to effect withdrawals upon the
receipt of appropriate notice from the relevant Trustee so as to
enable such Trustee to purchase the identified Equipment Notes
on the terms and conditions set forth in the Note Purchase
Agreement. Interest on the Deposits relating to each Trust will
be paid to the Certificateholders of such Trust as
Receiptholders through a Paying Agent appointed by the Escrow
Agent. Pending satisfaction of such conditions and withdrawal of
such Deposits, the Escrow Agents rights with respect to
the Deposits will remain plan assets subject to the fiduciary
responsibility and prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA
and Section 4975 of the Code.
There can be no assurance that the Department of Labor would
determine that the Underwriter Exemption would be applicable to
Class A Certificates in these circumstances. In particular,
the Department of Labor might assert that the escrow arrangement
is tantamount to an impermissible pre-funding rendering the
Underwriter Exemption inapplicable. In addition, even if all of
the conditions of the Underwriter Exemption are satisfied with
respect to the Class A Certificates, no assurance can be
given that the Underwriter Exemption would apply with respect to
all transactions involving the Class A Certificates or the
assets of the Class A Trust. In particular, it appears that
the Underwriter Exemption would not apply to the purchase by
Class B Certificateholders of Class A Certificates in
connection with the exercise of their rights upon the occurrence
and during the continuance of a Triggering Event. Therefore, the
fiduciary of a Plan considering the purchase of a Class A
Certificate should consider the availability of the exemptive
relief provided by the Underwriter Exemption, as well as the
availability of any other exemptions that may be applicable,
such as the Class Exemptions.
Transactions involving the Class B Certificates would not
be eligible for the Underwriter Exemption. Therefore, the
fiduciary of a Plan considering the purchase of a Class B
Certificate should consider the availability of other
exemptions, such as the Class Exemptions.
Governmental plans and certain church plans, while not subject
to the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA or the
prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and Section 4975
of the Code, may nevertheless be
S-82
subject to state or other federal laws that are substantially
similar to the foregoing provisions of ERISA and the Code.
Fiduciaries of any such plans should consult with their counsel
before purchasing any Certificates.
Any Plan fiduciary which proposes to cause a Plan to purchase
any Certificates should consult with its counsel regarding the
applicability of the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited
transaction provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the
Code to such an investment, and to confirm that such purchase
and holding will not constitute or result in a non-exempt
prohibited transaction or any other violation of an applicable
requirement of ERISA.
Each person who acquires or accepts a Certificate or an interest
therein, will be deemed by such acquisition or acceptance to
have represented and warranted that either: (i) no Plan
assets have been used to purchase or hold such Certificate or an
interest therein or (ii) the purchase and holding of such
Certificate or an interest therein are exempt from the
prohibited transaction restrictions of ERISA and the Code
pursuant to one or more prohibited transaction statutory or
administrative exemptions.
S-83
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement dated October , 2009
between Continental and the underwriters listed below
(collectively, the Underwriters), Continental has
agreed to cause each Trust to sell to the Underwriters, and the
Underwriters have agreed to purchase, the following respective
principal amounts of the Class A and Class B
Certificates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
of Class A
|
|
|
of Class B
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
474,273,000
|
|
|
$
|
105,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
Underwriters are subject to certain conditions precedent and
that the Underwriters are obligated to purchase all of the
Certificates if any are purchased. If an Underwriter defaults on
its purchase commitment, the purchase commitments of
non-defaulting Underwriters may be increased or the offering of
Certificates may be terminated.
The aggregate proceeds from the sale of the Certificates will be
$579,273,000. Continental will pay the Underwriters a commission
of $ . Continental estimates that
its expenses associated with the offer and sale of the
Certificates will be approximately
$ .
The Underwriters propose to offer the Certificates to the public
initially at the public offering prices on the cover page of
this Prospectus Supplement and to selling group members at those
prices less the concessions set forth below. The Underwriters
and selling group members may allow a discount to other
broker/dealers as set forth below. After the initial public
offering, the public offering prices and concessions and
discounts may be changed by the Underwriters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass Through
|
|
To Selling
|
|
Discount To
|
Certificates
|
|
Group Members
|
|
Broker/Dealers
|
|
2009-2A
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
2009-2B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Certificates are a new issue of securities with no
established trading market. Continental does not intend to apply
for the listing of the Certificates on a national securities
exchange. The Underwriters have advised Continental that one or
more of the Underwriters currently intend to make a market in
the Certificates, as permitted by applicable laws and
regulations. The Underwriters are not obligated, however, to
make a market in the Certificates and any such market making may
be discontinued at any time at their sole discretion.
Accordingly, no assurance can be given as to the liquidity of
the trading market for the Certificates.
Continental has agreed to indemnify the Underwriters against
certain liabilities including liabilities under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or contribute to payments which the
Underwriters may be required to make in that respect.
From time to time, the Underwriters or their affiliates have
performed and are performing investment banking and advisory
services for, and have provided and are providing general
financing and banking services to, Continental and its
affiliates, including, with respect to Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Goldman,
Sachs & Co., serving as counterparties to certain fuel
hedging arrangements. In particular, an affiliate of Goldman,
Sachs & Co. is a lender to Continental.
Continental expects that delivery of the Certificates will be
made against payment therefor on or about the closing date
specified on the cover page of this Prospectus Supplement, which
will be
the
business day following the date hereof (this settlement cycle
being referred to as
T+
). Under
Rule 15c6-1
of the
S-84
Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, trades in
the secondary market generally are required to settle in three
business days, unless the parties to the trade expressly agree
otherwise. Accordingly, purchasers who wish to trade
Certificates on the date hereof or the
next
succeeding business days will be required, by virtue of the fact
that the Certificates initially will settle in
T+ ,
to specify an alternate settlement cycle at the time of any
trade to prevent a failed settlement and should consult their
own advisor.
To facilitate the offering of the Certificates, the Underwriters
may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise
affect the price of the Certificates. Specifically, the
Underwriters may overallot in connection with the Offering,
creating a short position in the Certificates for their own
account. In addition, to cover overallotments or to stabilize
the price of the Certificates, the Underwriters may bid for, and
purchase, Certificates in the open market. Finally, the
Underwriters may reclaim selling concessions allowed to an agent
or a dealer for distributing Certificates in the Offering, if
the Underwriters repurchase previously distributed Certificates
in transactions to cover syndicate short positions, in
stabilization transactions or otherwise. Any of these activities
may stabilize or maintain the market price of the Certificates
above independent market levels. The Underwriters are not
required to engage in these activities, and may end any of these
activities at any time.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the Certificates is being passed upon for
Continental by Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, New York,
New York, and for the Underwriters by Milbank, Tweed,
Hadley & McCloy LLP, New York, New York. Milbank,
Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP will rely on the opinion of
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware,
counsel for Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, as to
matters of Delaware law relating to the Pass Through
Trust Agreements.
EXPERTS
Our consolidated financial statements appearing in our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 24, 2009 and the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008 have been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set
forth in its reports thereon, which are incorporated by
reference herein. Our financial statements are incorporated by
reference in reliance upon such reports given on the authority
of Ernst & Young LLP as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The references to AISI, BK and MBA, and to their respective
appraisal reports, dated October 23, 2009, October 23,
2009 and October 26, 2009, respectively, are included
herein in reliance upon the authority of each such firm as an
expert with respect to the matters contained in its appraisal
report.
S-85
INCORPORATION
OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The following documents filed by Continental with the Commission
are incorporated by reference in this Prospectus Supplement:
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Date Filed
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
February 19, 2009
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
April 24, 2009
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
July 21, 2009
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
October 21, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
January 6, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
February 3, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
March 3, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
April 2, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
April 24, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
May 4, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
June 2, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
June 12, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
July 2, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
July 2, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
July 17, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
July 17, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
August 4, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
August 7, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
August 10, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
September 2, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
Our Commission file number is 1-10323.
Reference is made to the information under Incorporation
of Certain Documents by Reference in the accompanying
Prospectus.
S-86
APPENDIX I
INDEX OF TERMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
60-Day Period
|
|
|
S-21
|
|
Actual Disposition Event
|
|
|
S-42
|
|
Additional Equipment Notes
|
|
|
S-55
|
|
Additional Junior Certificates
|
|
|
S-55
|
|
Additional Trust
|
|
|
S-55
|
|
Additional Trustee
|
|
|
S-55
|
|
Administration Expenses
|
|
|
S-40
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
S-44
|
|
AISI
|
|
|
S-45
|
|
Appraisal
|
|
|
S-40
|
|
Appraised Current Market Value
|
|
|
S-40
|
|
Appraisers
|
|
|
S-45
|
|
Assumed Amortization Schedule
|
|
|
S-17
|
|
Average Life Date
|
|
|
S-49
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
Base Rate
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
Basic Agreement
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
BK
|
|
|
S-45
|
|
Boeing
|
|
|
S-46
|
|
Business Day
|
|
|
S-17
|
|
Cape Town Treaty
|
|
|
S-52
|
|
Cash Collateral Account
|
|
|
S-33
|
|
Cede
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
Certificate Account
|
|
|
S-16
|
|
Certificate Buyout Event
|
|
|
S-21
|
|
Certificate Owner
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
Certificateholders
|
|
|
S-15
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Chase
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
Chase processing agreement
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
Class A Certificates
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Class A Trust
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Class A Trustee
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Class B Adjusted Interest
|
|
|
S-42
|
|
Class B Certificates
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Class B Trust
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Class B Trustee
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Class Exemptions
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
clearing agency
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
clearing corporation
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
CMI
|
|
|
S-2
|
|
Code
|
|
|
S-22
|
|
Commission
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Company
|
|
|
S-13
|
|
Continental
|
|
|
S-13
|
|
Continental Bankruptcy Event
|
|
|
S-39
|
|
Controlling Party
|
|
|
S-10
|
|
Convention
|
|
|
S-52
|
|
Current Distribution Date
|
|
|
S-41
|
|
Debt Balance
|
|
|
S-53
|
|
Deemed Disposition Event
|
|
|
S-42
|
|
default
|
|
|
S-20
|
|
Delivery Period
|
|
|
S-46
|
|
Delivery Period Termination Date
|
|
|
S-29
|
|
Delta
|
|
|
S-10
|
|
Deposit
|
|
|
S-29
|
|
Deposit Agreement
|
|
|
S-29
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
Depositary Threshold Rating
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
DHS
|
|
|
S-10
|
|
disqualified persons
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
Distribution Date
|
|
|
S-40
|
|
Downgrade Drawing
|
|
|
S-33
|
|
DTC
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
DTC Participants
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
S-50
|
|
Equipment Note Special Payment
|
|
|
S-40
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
|
S-47
|
|
ERISA
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
ERISA Plans
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
Escrow Agent
|
|
|
S-31
|
|
Escrow Agreements
|
|
|
S-31
|
|
Escrow Receipts
|
|
|
S-31
|
|
Event of Loss
|
|
|
S-54
|
|
excusable delay
|
|
|
S-46
|
|
Expected Distributions
|
|
|
S-41
|
|
FAA
|
|
|
S-9
|
|
Final Distributions
|
|
|
S-38
|
|
Final Drawing
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
Final Maturity Date
|
|
|
S-15
|
|
Fitch
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
H.15(519)
|
|
|
S-49
|
|
Indenture
|
|
|
S-24
|
|
Indenture Defaults
|
|
|
S-49
|
|
Indirect DTC Participants
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
Intercreditor Agreement
|
|
|
S-38
|
|
I-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Interest Drawing
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
IRS
|
|
|
S-57
|
|
Issuance Date
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
S-36
|
|
Liquidity Event of Default
|
|
|
S-36
|
|
Liquidity Expenses
|
|
|
S-41
|
|
Liquidity Facility
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
Liquidity Obligations
|
|
|
S-41
|
|
Liquidity Provider
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
Liquidity Threshold Rating
|
|
|
S-34
|
|
Loan Trustee
|
|
|
S-47
|
|
LTVs
|
|
|
S-7
|
|
Make-Whole Premium
|
|
|
S-25
|
|
Maximum Available Commitment
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
Maximum Commitment
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
MBA
|
|
|
S-45
|
|
Minimum Sale Price
|
|
|
S-39
|
|
Moodys
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
most recent H.15(519)
|
|
|
S-49
|
|
New Trustee
|
|
|
S-25
|
|
NOLs
|
|
|
S-7
|
|
Non-Extension Drawing
|
|
|
S-34
|
|
Non-Performing Equipment Notes
|
|
|
S-41
|
|
non-U.S.
Certificateholder
|
|
|
S-60
|
|
Northwest
|
|
|
S-10
|
|
Note Holders
|
|
|
S-25
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement
|
|
|
S-24
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
S-55
|
|
Original Trustee
|
|
|
S-25
|
|
Original Trusts
|
|
|
S-25
|
|
Participation Agreement
|
|
|
S-24
|
|
parties in interest
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
Pass Through Trust Agreements
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Paying Agent
|
|
|
S-31
|
|
Paying Agent Account
|
|
|
S-17
|
|
Performing Equipment Note
|
|
|
S-33
|
|
Plan Asset Regulation
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
Pool Balance
|
|
|
S-17
|
|
Pool Factor
|
|
|
S-17
|
|
Post Default Appraisals
|
|
|
S-40
|
|
Preferred B Pool Balance
|
|
|
S-42
|
|
PTC Event of Default
|
|
|
S-21
|
|
PTCE
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
qualified professional asset manager
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
qualifying income
|
|
|
S-57
|
|
Rating Agencies
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
Receiptholder
|
|
|
S-31
|
|
Refinancing Certificates
|
|
|
S-56
|
|
Refinancing Trust
|
|
|
S-56
|
|
Regular Distribution Dates
|
|
|
S-15
|
|
Remaining Weighted Average Life
|
|
|
S-49
|
|
Replacement Facility
|
|
|
S-33
|
|
Required Amount
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
Scheduled Payments
|
|
|
S-15
|
|
Section 1110
|
|
|
S-50
|
|
Section 2.4 Fraction
|
|
|
S-41
|
|
Section 382
|
|
|
S-7
|
|
Series A Equipment Notes
|
|
|
S-47
|
|
Series B Equipment Notes
|
|
|
S-47
|
|
Special Distribution Date
|
|
|
S-16
|
|
Special Payment
|
|
|
S-16
|
|
Special Payments Account
|
|
|
S-16
|
|
Special Termination Drawing
|
|
|
S-34
|
|
Special Termination Notice
|
|
|
S-34
|
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
Stated Interest Rates
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
Subordination Agent
|
|
|
S-38
|
|
Substitute Aircraft
|
|
|
S-46
|
|
Successor Trust
|
|
|
S-25
|
|
Tax Counsel
|
|
|
S-57
|
|
Termination Notice
|
|
|
S-36
|
|
The Bank of New York
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
Transfer Date
|
|
|
S-25
|
|
Transportation Code
|
|
|
S-21
|
|
Treasury Yield
|
|
|
S-48
|
|
Triggering Event
|
|
|
S-16
|
|
Trust Indenture Act
|
|
|
S-22
|
|
Trust Property
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Trust Supplement
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Trustee
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
TSA
|
|
|
S-10
|
|
U.S. Certificateholders
|
|
|
S-57
|
|
U.S. Persons
|
|
|
S-57
|
|
Underwriter Exemption
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
|
S-65
|
|
United
|
|
|
S-4
|
|
I-2
APPENDIX II
APPRAISAL LETTERS
Continental Airlines, Inc.
11th Floor, HQSFN 1600 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002
Sight Unseen Base Value Opinion
19 Aircraft Portfolio
AISI File No.: A9S056BVO
Date: 23 October 2009
Headquarters: 26072 Merit Circle, Suite 123, Laguna Hills, CA 92653
TEL: 949-582-8888 FAX: 949-582-8887 E-MAIL: mail@AISI.aero
II-1
23 October 2009
Continental Airlines, Inc.
11th Floor, HQSFN 1600 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002
|
|
|
Subject:
|
|
Sight Unseen Base Value Opinion |
|
|
19 Aircraft portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
AISI File number: A9S056BVO |
|
|
|
Ref:
|
|
(a) Email messages 24/29/30 September 2009 |
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
Aircraft Information Services, Inc. (AISI) has been requested to offer our opinion of the sight
unseen base value in half life and maintenance adjusted condition for eight used aircraft and in
new condition for eleven future delivery aircraft for a total portfolio of 19 Aircraft as
identified and defined in Table I and referenced in (a) above (the Aircraft). New aircraft are
valued in then delivery million US dollars and all other aircraft are in October 2009 million US
dollars.
1. Methodology and Definitions
The standard terms of reference for commercial aircraft value are base value and current market
value of an average aircraft. Base value is a theoretical value that assumes a hypothetical
balanced market while current market value is the value in the real market; both assume a
hypothetical average aircraft condition. All other values are derived from these values. AISI value
definitions are consistent with the current definitions of the International Society of Transport
Aircraft Trading (ISTAT), those of 01 January 1994. AISI is a member of that organization and
employs an ISTAT Certified and Senior Certified Appraiser.
AISI defines a base value as that of a transaction between an equally willing and informed buyer
and seller, neither under compulsion to buy or sell, for a single unit cash transaction with no
hidden value or liability, with supply and demand of the sale item roughly in balance and with no
event which would cause a short term change in the market. Base values are typically given for
aircraft in new condition, average half-life condition, or adjusted for an aircraft in a
specifically described condition at a specific time.
An average aircraft is an operable airworthy aircraft in average physical condition and with
average accumulated flight hours and cycles, with clear title and standard unrestricted certificate
of airworthiness, and registered in an authority which does not represent a penalty to aircraft
value or liquidity, with no damage history and with inventory configuration and level of modification which is normal for its intended use and age.
Headquarters: 26072 Merit Circle, Suite 123, Laguna Hills, CA 92653
TEL: 949-582-8888 FAX: 949-582-8887 E-MAIL: mail@AISI.aero
23 October 2009
AISI File No. A9S056BVO
Page - 2 -
Note that a stored aircraft is not an average aircraft. AISI assumes average condition unless
otherwise specified in this report.
AISI also assumes that airframe, engine and component parts are from the original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) and that maintenance, maintenance program and essential records are sufficient
to permit normal commercial operation under a strict airworthiness authority.
Half-life condition assumes that every component or maintenance service which has a prescribed
interval that determines its service life, overhaul interval or interval between maintenance
services, is at a condition which is one-half of the total interval.
Full-life condition assumes zero time since overhaul of airframe, gear, apu, engine overhaul and
engine LLPs.
An adjusted appraisal reflects an adjustment from half life condition for the actual condition,
utilization, life remaining or time remaining of an airframe, engine or component.
It should be noted that AISI and ISTAT value definitions apply to a transaction involving a single
aircraft, and that transactions involving more than one aircraft are often executed at considerable
and highly variable discounts to a single aircraft price, for a variety of reasons relating to an
individual buyer or seller.
AISI defines a current market value, which is synonymous with the older term fair market value
as that value which reflects the real market conditions including short term events, whether at,
above or below the base value conditions. Assumptions of a single unit sale and definitions of
aircraft condition, buyer/seller qualifications and type of transaction remain unchanged from that
of base value. Current market value takes into consideration the status of the economy in which
the aircraft is used, the status of supply and demand for the particular aircraft type, the value
of recent transactions and the opinions of informed buyers and sellers. Note that for a current
market value to exist, the seller may not be under duress. Current market value assumes that there
is no short term time constraint to buy or sell.
AISI defines a distressed market value as that value which reflects the real market condition
including short term events, when the market for the subject aircraft is so depressed that the
seller is under duress. Distressed market value assumes that there is a time constraint to sell
within a period of less than 1 year. All other assumptions remain unchanged from that of current
market value.
None of the AISI value definitions take into account remarketing costs, brokerage costs, storage
costs, recertification costs or removal costs.
23 October 2009
AISI File No. A9S056BVO
Page - 3 -
AISI encourages the use of base values to consider historical trends, to establish a consistent
baseline for long term value comparisons and future value considerations, or to consider how actual
market values vary from theoretical base values. Base values are less volatile than current market
values and tend to diminish regularly with time. Base values are normally inappropriate to
determine near term values. AISI encourages the use of current market values to consider the
probable near term value of an aircraft when the seller is not under duress. AISI encourages the
use of distressed market values to consider the probable near term value of an aircraft when the
seller is under duress.
No physical inspection of the Aircraft or their essential records was made by AISI for the purposes
of this report, nor has any attempt been made to verify information provided to us, which is
assumed to be correct and applicable to the Aircraft.
If more than one aircraft is contained in this report than it should be noted that the values given
are not directly additive, that is, the total of the given values is not the value of the fleet but
rather the sum of the values of the individual aircraft if sold individually over time so as not to
exceed demand.
2. Valuation
For the eight used aircraft, adjustments are calculated to account for the maintenance status of
the aircraft as indicated to AISI by the client in the above referenced (a) data and in accordance
with standard AISI methods. Adjustments are calculated only where there is sufficient information
to do so, or where reasonable assumptions can be made.
All hours and cycle information provided for airframe, maintenance checks, gear and engines have
been projected from the data provided to October 2009 based on a daily utilization factor
calculated for each aircraft. All maintenance work, if any, which became due as a result of
projecting the hour and cycle information forward was assumed to have been completed and a new
cycle started unless more than one cycle would have elapsed, then half life was assumed. All used
aircraft are in October 2009 million US dollars.
The eleven future delivery aircraft are valued in new condition. New aircraft are valued in then
delivery million US dollars assuming a 2.5% inflation rate and 0.5% escalation rate between October
2009 and the future delivery date.
AISI has been informed that 8C Checks are due in the near term for aircraft serial numbers 30584
and 30779 which are assumed to have been completed for this appraisal.
It is our considered opinion that the sight unseen base values of the Aircraft are as follows in
Table I subject to the assumptions, definitions, and disclaimers herein.
23 October 2009
AISI File No. A9S056BVO
Page - 4 -
Table I
October 2009 Million US Dollars for Used Aircraft Values
Then Delivery Current Million US Dollars for New Aircraft Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Life |
|
Adjusted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Value |
|
Base Value |
|
|
|
|
Serial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Million |
|
Million |
No. |
|
Aircraft Type |
|
Number |
|
DoM |
|
Engine Type |
|
MTOW |
|
US Dollars |
|
US Dollars |
1 |
|
B737-800 |
|
28947 |
|
Aug-99 |
|
CFM56-7B26 |
|
174,200 |
|
$23.55 |
|
$26.70 |
2 |
|
B737-800 |
|
30584 |
|
Sep-00 |
|
CFM56-7B26 |
|
174,200 |
|
$25.13 |
|
$26.03 |
3 |
|
B737-800 |
|
30779 |
|
Sep-00 |
|
CFM56-7B26 |
|
174,200 |
|
$25.13 |
|
$24.92 |
4 |
|
B757-200 |
|
30352 |
|
Feb-00 |
|
RB211-535E4B |
|
255,000 |
|
$24.41 |
|
$23.71 |
5 |
|
B757-200 |
|
30353 |
|
Feb-00 |
|
RB211-535E4B |
|
255,000 |
|
$24.41 |
|
$21.97 |
6 |
|
B757-200 |
|
30354 |
|
Jun-00 |
|
RB211-535E4B |
|
255,000 |
|
$24.41 |
|
$25.51 |
7 |
|
B767-400ER |
|
29447 |
|
Sep-00 |
|
CF6-80C2B8F |
|
450,000 |
|
$38.78 |
|
$38.04 |
8 |
|
B777-200ER |
|
29859 |
|
Jun-99 |
|
GE90-94B |
|
656,000 |
|
$71.64 |
|
$72.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Half Life |
|
New |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Value |
|
Base Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Million |
|
Million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Dollars |
|
US Dollars |
9 |
|
B737-800 |
|
30132 |
|
Jan-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
$52.82 |
|
$58.21 |
10 |
|
B737-800 |
|
31658 |
|
Jan-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
$52.82 |
|
$58.21 |
11 |
|
B737-800 |
|
31662 |
|
Feb-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
$52.97 |
|
$58.36 |
12 |
|
B737-800 |
|
31660 |
|
Feb-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
$52.97 |
|
$58.36 |
13 |
|
B737-800 |
|
37101 |
|
Mar-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
$53.13 |
|
$58.52 |
14 |
|
B737-800 |
|
31642 |
|
Mar-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
$53.13 |
|
$58.52 |
15 |
|
B737-800 |
|
31659 |
|
Apr-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
$53.28 |
|
$58.67 |
16 |
|
B737-800 |
|
38700 |
|
May-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
$53.43 |
|
$58.82 |
17 |
|
B737-800 |
|
38701 |
|
Jun-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
$53.58 |
|
$58.97 |
18 |
|
B777-200ER |
|
39776 |
|
Apr-10 |
|
GE90-94B |
|
656,000 |
|
$142.44 |
|
$157.96 |
19 |
|
B777-200ER |
|
39777 |
|
May-10 |
|
GE90-94B |
|
656,000 |
|
$142.85 |
|
$158.37 |
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
1) 8C Checks due in the near term for aircraft serial numbers 30584 and 30779 are assumed to have been completed. |
|
|
|
2) Hypothetical Half Life Values are values for new aircraft in the hypothetical condition
where all components or maintenance service is at a condition which is one-half of the total life
interval. New aircraft would not be at this hypothetical condition; this value is used for
comparison only |
23 October 2009
AISI File No. A9S056BVO
Page - 5 -
Unless otherwise agreed by Aircraft Information Services, Inc. (AISI) in writing, this report shall
be for the sole use of the client/addressee. This report is offered as a fair and unbiased
assessment of the subject aircraft. AISI has no past, present, or anticipated future interest in
any of the subject aircraft. The conclusions and opinions expressed in this report are based on
published information, information provided by others, reasonable interpretations and calculations
thereof and are given in good faith. AISI certifies that this report has been independently
prepared and it reflects AISIs conclusions and opinions which are judgments that reflect
conditions and values current at the time of this report. The values and conditions reported upon
are subject to any subsequent change. AISI shall not be liable to any party for damages arising out
of reliance or alleged reliance on this report, or for any partys action or failure to act as a
result of reliance or alleged reliance on this report.
Sincerely,
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
John D. McNicol
President
October 23, 2009
Continental Airlines, Inc.
11th Floor, HQSFN 1600 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002
Ladies & Gentlemen:
In response to your request, BK Associates, Inc. is pleased to provide our opinion regarding the
Base Values (BV) for 19 Boeing aircraft currently or expected to be in the Continental Airlines
Fleet (the Aircraft). The aircraft include eight B737, B757, B767 or B777 aircraft already in
service (the Owned Aircraft), nine B737-800 and two B777 aircraft scheduled to be delivered in
the First Half of 2010 (the New Aircraft). Our opinion of the values is included in the attached
Figure 1 along with the identification of each aircraft by manufacturers serial number, date of
manufacture, engine model and maximum takeoff weight.
Our values presented in Figure 1 include both a half-time value as well as a maintenance-adjusted
value, which includes appropriate financial adjustments based on our interpretation of the
maintenance summary and fleet utilization data you provided. The adjustments are approximate,
based on industry average costs, and normally would include an adjustment for the time remaining to
a C check, time remaining to a D check (in this case they may be the 2C, 4C or the 8C
depending on the aircraft type), time remaining to landing gear overhaul, time since the most
recent heavy shop visit on engines and time remaining on engine life limited parts.
For two of the Owned Aircraft, 8C checks are due in the very near future. These are aircraft
Nos. 2 and 3 in Figure 1. For these, we have assumed the 8C check is completed.
For the New Aircraft, our opinion of the new value is given since they will not reach half-time for
some time.
October 23, 2009
Page 2
DEFINITIONS
According to the International Society of Transport Aircraft Tradings (ISTAT) definition of Base
Value, to which BK Associates subscribes, the quoted base value is the Appraisers opinion of the
underlying economic value of an aircraft in an open, unrestricted, stable market environment with a
reasonable balance of supply and demand, and assumes full consideration of its highest and best
use. An aircrafts base value is founded in the historical trend of values and in the projection
of future value trends and presumes an arms length, cash transaction between willing, able and
knowledgeable parties, acting prudently, with an absence of duress and with a reasonable period of
time available for marketing.
MARKET DISCUSSION & METHODOLOGY
For a newly delivered aircraft one can argue that, almost by definition, the base value and market
value is approximately equal to the actual selling price. Without the existence of white tails
or finished aircraft for which there is no buyer, the very existence of a buyer and seller at the
agreed price suggests the market is in balance and the purchase price is the base value.
We do not know the purchase price of the Continental B737-800 aircraft but we do know the list
price is in the range between $65 and $70 million depending on the configuration and options. We
also know that nobody pays list price and the discount is normally at least 15 percent. Discounts
of 25 to 35 percent are often applied for airlines placing large orders. We also have done several
other recent appraisals on similar aircraft for which we concluded the new price was $50,150,000.
These aircraft were similar except that they had the higher thrust 7B27 engines. Considering
this and the configuration and specifications of the New Aircraft, we conclude its likely new price
is approximately $49,400,000, escalating to $49,550,000 for those delivered in the Second Quarter
of 2010.
By a similar methodology we concluded the B777-200ER aircraft have a new price of $128,950,000.
Regarding the other Aircraft already in service, as the definition implies, the base value is
determined from long-term historical trends. BK Associates has accumulated a database of over
10,000 data points of aircraft sales that occurred since 1970. From analysis of
October 23, 2009
Page 3
these data we know, for example, what the average aircraft should sell for as a percentage of its
new price, as well as the high and low values that have occurred in strong and weak markets.
Based on these data, we have developed relationships between aircraft age and sale price for
wide-bodies, narrow-bodies, large turboprops and, more recently, regional jet and freighter
aircraft. Within these groups we have developed further refinements for such things as derivative
aircraft, aircraft still in production versus no longer in production, and aircraft early in the
production run versus later models. Within each group variations are determined by the performance
capabilities of each aircraft relative to the others. We now track some 150 different variations
of aircraft types and models and determine current and forecast base values. These relationships
are verified, and changed or updated if necessary, when actual sales data becomes available.
This relationship between sales price as a function of age and the original price is depicted in
the following figure.
October 23, 2009
Page 4
All of the Aircraft other than the New Aircraft are nine to 10 years old. The data suggest that a
nine to 10-year old aircraft should sell for 46 to 50 percent of its original price. So, for the
B737-800s for example, the original price was likely about $42 million. The data suggest that on
average today after allowing for inflation it should sell for about $25.1 million. By a similar
analysis the suggested average selling price today for the B757s is $28 million, for the B767-400
is $56 million and $73 million for the B777. However, recent experience has shown that after a
long production run, even popular and successful aircraft tend to approach or fall below the
average line in the figure, especially when the specific aircraft is in the latter half of its
likely useful life. By contrast, new, popular and successful models tend to have values above the
line for the first 10 years or so.
There is no doubt that most of these models have been quite successful. The B757 and B767 are the
exceptions. The B757 was very successful in its day but is now out of production after a long
production run. We conclude the B757s are slightly below the average suggested by the historical
data at $23.5 to $23.75 million. Similarly, while the B767-300ER has and still is very successful,
the -400 is out of production after a short production run. Only 37 were made and they are all
with two airlines. We conclude its base value is $53.9 million.
The other Aircraft are successful and still young in their production run. We concluded they have
base values above the average line in the figure.
These values are adjusted further from the average suggested by the historical comparison to
reflect differences in engine model and the addition of blended winglets.
As noted earlier in the conclusions, these half-time values are adjusted with an appropriate
financial adjustment to reach the maintenance-adjusted values. These adjustments are based on our
assessment of industry average costs and may not be the same as Continentals cost. Another buyer
of the aircraft may have to have the work done elsewhere at a different cost.
ASSUMPTIONS & DISCLAIMER
It should be understood that BK Associates has neither inspected the Aircraft nor the related
maintenance records, but has relied upon the information provided by you and in the BK Associates
database. The assumptions have been made that all Airworthiness
Directives have been complied with; accident damage has not been incurred that would affect market
values; and maintenance has been accomplished in accordance with a civil
October 23, 2009
Page 5
airworthiness authoritys approved maintenance program and accepted industry standards. Further,
we have assumed unless otherwise stated, that each Aircraft is in typical configuration for the
type and other than the New Aircraft, has accumulated an average number of hours and cycles.
Deviations from these assumptions can change significantly our opinion regarding the values.
BK Associates, Inc. has no present or contemplated future interest in the Aircraft, nor any
interest that would preclude our making a fair and unbiased estimate. This appraisal represents
the opinion of BK Associates, Inc. and reflects our best judgment based on the information
available to us at the time of preparation and the time and budget constraints imposed by the
client. It is not given as a recommendation, or as an inducement, for any financial transaction
and further, BK Associates, Inc. assumes no responsibility or legal liability for any action taken
or not taken by the addressee, or any other party, with regard to the appraised equipment. By
accepting this appraisal, the addressee agrees that BK Associates, Inc. shall bear no such
responsibility or legal liability. This appraisal is prepared for the use of the addressee and
shall not be provided to other parties without the express consent of the addressee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
BK ASSOCIATES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Keitz |
|
|
President |
|
|
ISTAT Senior Certified Appraiser
And Appraiser Fellow |
|
|
JFK/kf
Attachment
Figure 1
Continental Airlines
Values $millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIRCRAFT |
|
|
|
SERIAL |
|
DELIVERY |
|
|
|
MTOW |
|
1/2 time |
|
Mt. Adj. |
|
|
TYPE |
|
REGIST. |
|
NUMBER |
|
DATE |
|
ENGINE |
|
Lbs. |
|
BV |
|
BV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
737-800 |
|
N14235 |
|
28947 |
|
Aug-99 |
|
CFM56-7B26 |
|
174,200 |
|
28.20 |
|
30.59 |
2 |
|
737-800 |
|
N37253 |
|
30584 |
|
Sep-00 |
|
CFM56-7B26 |
|
174,200 |
|
30.40 |
|
31.33 |
3 |
|
737-800 |
|
N76254 |
|
30779 |
|
Sep-00 |
|
CFM56-7B26 |
|
174,200 |
|
30.40 |
|
30.23 |
4 |
|
737-800 |
|
N76519 |
|
30132 |
|
Jan-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
49.40 |
|
49.40 |
5 |
|
737-800 |
|
N77520 |
|
31658 |
|
Jan-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
49.40 |
|
49.40 |
6 |
|
737-800 |
|
N79521 |
|
31662 |
|
Feb-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
49.40 |
|
49.40 |
7 |
|
737-800 |
|
N76522 |
|
31660 |
|
Feb-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
49.40 |
|
49.40 |
8 |
|
737-800 |
|
N76523 |
|
37101 |
|
Mar-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
49.40 |
|
49.40 |
9 |
|
737-800 |
|
N78524 |
|
31642 |
|
Mar-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
49.40 |
|
49.40 |
10 |
|
737-800 |
|
N77525 |
|
31659 |
|
Apr-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
49.40 |
|
49.40 |
11 |
|
737-800 |
|
N76526 |
|
38700 |
|
May-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
49.55 |
|
49.55 |
12 |
|
737-800 |
|
N87527 |
|
38701 |
|
Jun-10 |
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
174,200 |
|
49.55 |
|
49.55 |
13 |
|
757-200 |
|
N17139 |
|
30352 |
|
Feb-00 |
|
RB211-535E4B |
|
255,000 |
|
23.50 |
|
21.72 |
14 |
|
757-200 |
|
N41140 |
|
30353 |
|
Feb-00 |
|
RB211-535E4B |
|
255,000 |
|
23.50 |
|
23.81 |
15 |
|
757-200 |
|
N19141 |
|
30354 |
|
Jun-00 |
|
RB211-535E4B |
|
255,000 |
|
23.75 |
|
25.44 |
16 |
|
767-400ER |
|
N67052 |
|
29447 |
|
Sep-00 |
|
CF6-80C2B8F |
|
450,000 |
|
53.90 |
|
51.16 |
17 |
|
777-200ER |
|
N79011 |
|
29859 |
|
Jun-99 |
|
GE90-94B |
|
656,000 |
|
75.45 |
|
73.38 |
18 |
|
777-200ER |
|
N76021 |
|
39776 |
|
Apr-10 |
|
GE90-94B |
|
656,000 |
|
128.95 |
|
128.95 |
19 |
|
777-200ER |
|
N77022 |
|
39777 |
|
May-10 |
|
GE90-94B |
|
656,000 |
|
128.95 |
|
128.95 |
|
|
|
Note: |
|
For the new aircraft the above values are zero-time and not half time. Aircraft #2 and #3
are scheduled for 8C Check in the near future. For purposes of this appraisal it is assumed completed. |
Extended Desktop Appraisal of:
Eight (8) Aircraft of various types
currently operated by Continental Airlines, Inc.
and Nine (9) Aircraft for future new delivery
Client:
Continental Airlines, Inc.
Date:
October 26, 2009
Washington D.C.
2101 Wilson Boulevard
Suite 1001
Arlington, VA 22201
Tel: 1 703 276 3200
Fax: 1 703 276 3201
Frankfurt
Wilhelm-Heinrich-Str. 22
61250 Usingen
Germany
Tel: 40 (0) 69 97168 436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tokyo
3-16-16 Higashiooi
Shinagawa-ku
Tokyo 140-0011
Japan
Tel/Fax: 81 1 3763 6845
|
|
|
I. |
|
Introduction and Executive Summary |
Table of Contents:
|
I. |
|
Introduction |
|
|
II. |
|
Value Definitions/Terminology |
|
|
III. |
|
Current Market Conditions |
|
|
IV. |
|
Valuation |
|
|
V. |
|
Covenants |
Morten Beyer & Agnew (mba) has been retained by Continental Airlines, Inc. (the Client) to
provide an Extended Desktop Appraisal to determine the Maintenance Adjusted Current Base Value
(CBV) of eight (8) aircraft of various types currently operated by Continental Airlines, Inc. as of
October 2009. mba will also provide New Delivery Base Values of nine) (9) future new delivery
Boeing 737-800 aircraft and two (2) future new delivery Boeing 777-200LR aircraft. These
aircraft are further identified in Section IV of this report.
In performing this appraisal, mba relied on industry knowledge and intelligence, confidentially
obtained data points, its market expertise and current analysis of market trends
and conditions, along with information extrapolated from its semi-annual publications
mba Future Aircraft Values Jet Transport (FAV).
Based on the information set forth in this report, it is our opinion that the aggregate Maintenance
Adjusted Current Base Value and the New Delivery Base Value of the aircraft in this portfolio are
as follows and as more fully set forth in Section IV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
Adjusted CBV ($US)
|
8 A/C Total
|
|
$ |
273,060,000 |
|
|
|
New Delivery CBV
|
|
|
($US)
|
11 A/C Total
|
|
$ |
691,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Total (19 A/C)
|
|
$ |
964,660,000 |
|
Section II of this report presents definitions of various terms, such as
Current Base Value and Current Market Value as promulgated by the Appraisal
Program of the International Society of Transport Aircraft Trading (ISTAT). ISTAT
is a non-profit association of management personnel from banks, leasing companies, airlines,
manufacturers, brokers, and others who have a vested interest in the commercial
aviation industry and who have established a technical and ethical certification
program for expert appraisers.
Extended Desktop Appraisal
An Extended Desktop Appraisal is one that is characterized by the absence of any on-site
inspection of the aircraft or its maintenance records, but it does include
consideration of maintenance status information that is provided to the appraiser from the
client, aircraft operator, or in the case of a second opinion, possibly from another
appraisers report. An Extended Desktop Appraisal would normally provide a value that
includes adjustments from the mid-time, mid-life baseline to account for the actual maintenance
status of the aircraft. (ISTAT Handbook)
Base Value
The ISTAT definition of Base Value (BV) has, essentially, the same elements of Market Value except
that the market circumstances are assumed to be in a reasonable state of equilibrium. Thus, BV
pertains to an idealized aircraft and market combination, but will not necessarily reflect the
actual CMV of the aircraft in question at any point in time. BV is founded in the historical
trend of values and value in use, and is generally used to analyze historical values or to project
future values.
ISTAT defines Base Value as the Appraisers opinion of the underlying economic value
of an aircraft, engine, or inventory of aircraft parts/equipment (hereinafter referred
to as the asset), in an open, unrestricted, stable market environment with a reasonable
balance of supply and demand.
Full consideration is assumed of its highest and best use. An assets Base Value is founded in the historical trend of values and in the projection
of value trends and presumes an arms-length, cash transaction between willing, able, and
knowledgeable parties, acting prudently, with an absence of duress and with a reasonable period of
time available for marketing. In most cases, the Base Value of an asset assumes the physical
condition is average for an asset of its type and age. It further assumes the maintenance
time/life status is at mid-time, mid-life (or benefiting from an above-average maintenance status
if it is new or nearly new, as the case may be). Since Base Value pertains to a
somewhat idealized asset and market combination it may not necessarily reflect the actual current
value of the asset in question, but is a nominal starting value to which adjustments may be
applied to determine an actual value. Because it is related to long-term market trends, the Base
Value definition is commonly applied to analyses of historical values and projections of residual
values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 2 of 17
|
|
|
Qualifications
mba is a recognized provider of aircraft and aviation-related asset appraisals and
inspections. mba and its principals have been providing appraisal services to the aviation
industry for 40 years; and its employees adhere to the rules and ethics set forth by the
International Society of Transport Aircraft Traders (ISTAT). mbas clients include most of the
worlds major airlines, lessors, financial institutions, and manufacturers and suppliers. mba
maintains offices in Washington, Frankfurt, and Tokyo.
mba publishes the semi-annual Future Aircraft Values (FAV), a three-volume compendium of current
and projected aircraft values for the next 20 years for over 150 types of jet, turboprop, and cargo
aircraft.
mba also provides consulting services to the industry relating to operations, marketing, and
management with emphasis on financial/operational analysis, airline safety audits and
certification, utilizing hands-on solutions to current situations. mba also provides expert
testimony and witness support on cases involving collateral/asset disputes, bankruptcies, financial
operations, safety, regulatory and maintenance concerns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 3 of 17
|
|
|
III. |
|
Current Market Conditions |
General Market Observation
The demand for and value of new and used jet transport aircraft is primarily driven by the state of
the world economy. In periods of strong prosperity, traffic grows at high single
digit rates limiting slack capacity. Over the years, we have observed that traffic growth is
closely correlated to growth in regional and world domestic product. However, over the long term, the trend has been toward traffic lagging domestic product growth, with lower peaks,
and deeper declines indicating maturity in the airline industry.
In periods of decline (as observed in the early 1990s) large surplus of aircraft existed on the
market with a disastrous effect on short-term prices. Eventually, values returned to normal
levels, being driven by the inherent economies and suitability of the individual aircraft
types.
Commencing in late 2000, the majority of global economies began a slip into recession with slowing
traffic growth, a trend that was accelerated by the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The
destruction of economic value and loss of consumer confidence, combined with continued military
conflict in the Middle East and the SARS epidemic of 2003, slowed the pace of recovery
and stifled the demand for new aircraft.
However, 2005 saw renewed optimism within the industry, with passenger levels finally climbing back
to
pre-September 11th levels. This helped both Airbus & Boeing to reach record levels for new
orders with
Airbus claiming 1,1111 new orders in 2005 and Boeing reporting 1,0282 for a total of 2,139
aircraft. The strong demand for new airframes continued with combined orders for Airbus and
Boeing totaling 1,834 and 2,754 aircraft in 2006 and 2007 respectively. This continued high
order count can be attributed to high fuel prices forcing carriers to retire the less fuel-efficient
aircraft in their fleet, as well as the fleet replacement cycle. The
continued strength of the 787 with 93 additional orders in 2008 (total program 910 highest
total orders before first flight of any commercial aircraft program) and the re-emergence of
the A350 as the A350XWB has also contributed to the strong order cycle with Airbus claiming 483
total orders for the A350XWB program.
The 2008 Orders total 756 and 662 for Airbus and Boeing, respectively. The credit crisis has
expanded to encompass the broader economic base of the worlds developed countries and recession
is manifesting itself in the EU, US and BRIC counties as well as other emerging
markets around the world. This is reflected in Net Order totals being down to 125
for Airbus and 79 for Boeing, as of September 2009. Major lessors have begun to
suggest to Airbus and Boeing that current production rates should be curtailed in order
to stave-off value impairments due to deteriorating traffic and ability to secure financing
|
|
|
1 |
|
Source: www.airbus.com |
|
2 |
|
Source: www.boeing.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 4 of 17
|
|
|
for new deliveries. mba believes up to 30% of the current backlog is at risk due to the
combination of the above factors.
The rapid rise in oil prices hurt airlines during the usually prosperous summer months and,
paradoxically, while oil has come down 60% since July 2008, economic woes and increasing
unemployment is reducing traffic demand across-the-board. Airlines registered a US$ 10.4
billion loss in 2008. For 2009, after numerous downward revisions of the forecast, IATA
is currently forecasting a US $11.0 billion loss on continued decline in passenger and
cargo traffic, rising fuel prices and continued yield deterioration. Industry revenues
are expected to contract by US $80.0 billion (from US $535.0 billion in 2008 to US
$455.0 billion in 2009). Continental and United have announced significant capacity cuts, mainly
focusing on older less efficient aircraft such as the MD-80 family and the 737 Classics.
Southwest has deferred new deliveries again and the only ray of optimism we detect is American
accelerating new deliveries in order to retire MD-80s.
mba believes lower demand due to increased unemployment and finance availability coupled with
liquidity concerns of some carriers will see order deferrals/cancellations increasing and
the probability of lease defaults increasing in 2009. Residual values will be affected,
especially for less desirable aircraft types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 5 of 17
|
|
|
Boeing 737NG Family Aircraft
The Boeing 737 Next Generation (NG) family consists of the -600/-700/-800 and -900ER series.
Boeing received the go-ahead to replace the Classic 737s with the upgraded NG
versions in 1993 with the announcement of the 737-700. This was later followed with
the introduction of the 737-800 series in 1994, the -600 series in 1995 and finally the
-900 series in 1997. After the absorption of Douglas by Boeing, the 737NG became the mainstay
of the US short-haul fleet displacing older MD-80 aircraft. The 737NG has also made its way
to Europe with great success, and will continue to provide healthy competition for
the Airbus A320 family. To date, there are over 2,600 737NG aircraft in operation with over 150
operators.
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet Status |
|
737-800 |
|
Ordered |
|
|
3,251 |
|
Cancelled/Transferred |
|
|
174 |
|
Net Orders |
|
|
3,077 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
1,407 |
|
Delivered |
|
|
1,670 |
|
Destroyed/Retired |
|
|
5 |
|
Not in Service/Parked |
|
|
8 |
|
Active Aircraft |
|
|
1,657 |
|
Number of Operators |
|
|
118 |
|
Average Daily Utilization (Hrs) |
|
|
7.77 |
|
Average Fleet Age (Yrs) |
|
|
5.12 |
|
Source: AvSofts ACAS Database, August 2009
The 737NG continues to be very popular in North America and parts of Europe. Boeing took the 737-300
concept, upgraded its avionics and cockpit and redesigned the wing, launching a similar looking
aircraft with enhanced capabilities. The NG aircraft are also starting to compete with their older
and larger sibling the Boeing 757, with the entry into service of the 737-900ER to Lion Air in
April 2007. Delta, Continental and Southwest are finding it capable of operating
trans-continental routes profitably and Delta has, in some cases, replaced their 757s with
737-800 aircraft on routes to Central America. Efficient aircraft like the 737NG will continue to
dominate fleets around the world.
Both the 737NG family and the competing Airbus A320 family had an outstanding year in 2007,
receiving 850 and 914 orders respectively. But with the downturn of the economy in 2008 and the
difficulties faced by operators and lessors in acquiring financing, orders were down to 488 for
the Boeing 737NG family and 472 for the A320 family. This downward trend has continued in 2009
where Boeing and Airbus have 127 and 97 net orders respectively for their narrowbody products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 6 of 17
|
|
|
Because narrow body aircraft comprise the largest number of aircraft in the worlds fleets, it is
reasonable to expect a negative impact on their values in 2009 and beyond, as long as
the economic downturn persists. Modern aircraft like the 737NGs and the A320 family will not be
exempt, but will suffer less, particularly those aircraft less than 6 years old. Early build
examples of their type can expect to suffer a 5%-to-15% hit depending on their age. For older
aircraft, primarily those that are out of production, such as 737 Classics, and MD-80s, values
could decline more than 30%.
According to Back Aviation Solutions, as of September 2009, there are currently 8 Boeing 737-700s
and 13 Boeing 737-800s available for sale or lease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 7 of 17
|
|
|
Boeing 757-200
The twin engine 757-200 was introduced in 1978, and first delivered in 1982 as the successor to
the 727-200. The 757-200 is known for its exceptional fuel efficiency, low noise
levels, increased passenger comfort and top operating performance. Initially delivered
with a MGTOW (Maximum Gross Takeoff Weight) of 220,000 lb, the 757-200 evolved considerably
during its 23 years in production. The increased gross weight versions of the aircraft allow for
greater capacity and range, making the 757-200 suitable for thin long-haul routes. It was also
the first Boeing airliner launched with non-US engines, the Rolls Royce RB211-535 with the Pratt
and Whitney PW2037 and PW2040 offered as an option only later. The 757- 200 has also been
delivered as a PF (Package Freighter). Currently there exist several conversion
options including Boeing, Singapore Technologies Aerospace Ltd, Israel Aircraft
Industries, Precision Conversions, and Alcoa-SIE. Production of the 757-200 has ceased with
delivery of the last aircraft, in April 2005 to Shanghai Airlines.
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet Status |
|
757-200 |
|
Ordered |
|
|
1,008 |
|
Cancelled/Transferred |
|
|
101 |
|
Net Orders |
|
|
907 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
0 |
|
Delivered |
|
|
907 |
|
Destroyed/Retired |
|
|
24 |
|
Not in Service/Parked |
|
|
83 |
|
Converted to Freighter/Other |
|
|
77 |
|
Active Aircraft |
|
|
723 |
|
Number of Operators |
|
|
87 |
|
Average Daily Utilization (Hrs) |
|
|
8.85 |
|
Average Fleet Age (Yrs) |
|
|
15.80 |
|
Source: AvSofts ACAS Database, August 2009
Born out of the oil crisis of the 1970s when airlines were looking for more fuel-efficient and
quieter aircraft, the 757-200 became the aircraft of choice for major U.S. carriers operating
transcontinental routes. After this successful start, orders diminished during the late 1990s
with the introduction of the Airbus A320 family. The 757-200 found itself in an interesting market
niche, stuck between the small 737s and A320s and the larger 767 and A330 wide bodies.
Airlines began to look at covering the same routes with the greater operating flexibility of the
737s and A320s or the additional capacity of the larger 767 and A330 wide bodies. The 2001
terrorist attacks accelerated the end for the 757-200 as the majority of aircraft had been bought
and operated by U.S. airlines. With the major U.S airlines fighting for survival in
the industries worst ever downturn, none would place orders for 757s after 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 8 of 17
|
|
|
Prices for 757s have dropped to the point that cargo conversions are now beginning to be viable as
a replacement for 727-200 freighters for cargo operators like Fedex. Availability is increasing as
operators reduce capacity due to decreased consumer demand. mba expects values of 757s, like most
aircraft, to soften during the current tough economic climate.
According to Back Aviation Solutions, as of September 2009, there are currently 35
Boeing 757-200s available for sale or lease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 9 of 17
|
|
|
Boeing 767 Family
The twin-aisle wide body Boeing 767 was launched in 1978 and entered service in 1982. The
aircraft has undergone significant development in terms of gross weight and capacity, increasing
payload and range. The initial model, the Boeing 767-200, offered a Maximum Takeoff Weight
(MTOW) of 280,000 pounds. Early development of an ER model extended the weight and range of the
-200, enabling it to fly the Atlantic nonstop. Initial routings were circuitous, since the
aircraft had to stay within 90 minutes of a suitable landing place. But when the
FAA and international authorities approved the 767 and its operators for Extended Range
Operations (ETOPS), more direct routes became possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet Status |
|
767-400ER |
|
Ordered |
|
|
649 |
|
Cancelled/Transferred |
|
|
93 |
|
Net Orders |
|
|
556 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
28 |
|
Delivered |
|
|
528 |
|
Destroyed/Retired |
|
|
2 |
|
Not in Service/Parked |
|
|
31 |
|
Converted to Freighter/Other |
|
|
5 |
|
Active Aircraft |
|
|
490 |
|
Number of Operators |
|
|
83 |
|
Average Daily Utilization (Hrs) |
|
|
11.04 |
|
Average Fleet Age (Yrs) |
|
|
13.44 |
|
Source: AvSofts ACAS Database, August 2009
The 767-400ER first entered into service in 2000 with Delta Airlines and Continental Airlines,
replacing their ageing L-1011s and DC-10s. Only 38 aircraft have been delivered and it is an
example of Boeings willingness to build a niche aircraft tailored their customers needs. The
fuselage of the 767-400ER is 21 ft longer then the 767-300ER and the wingspan was increased by
14.3 ft. Other main enhancements of the 767-400ER are a higher Maximum Gross Takeoff Weight
and raked winglets that increased fuel efficiency. The 767-400ER was not a commercial
success for Boeing but the aircraft fits very well within the route structure of its only two
operators, Delta and Continental.
Much of the success of the 767 family in general can be attributed to its Extended Range
Twin-Engine Operations (ETOPS) capability that allowed it to become the dominant aircraft on the
trans-atlantic route, displacing older three and four engine widebodies. However, after
the 2001 terrorist attacks and the subsequent industry downturn, lease rates plummeted
and reduced the value of the aircraft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 10 of 17
|
|
|
Values for the 767 family have softened due to the current economic conditions, making older
767-300s and 767-300ERs prime candidates for freighter conversion. IAI Bedek Aviation
Group offers 767-300 conversions for approximately $11 million with a down time of 100 days.
Aeronavali and ST Aerospaces Aviation Services Company (SASCO) were selected by Boeing Airplane
Services to perform passenger to freighter conversions under the 767-300 Boeing Converted
Freighters (BCF) program. ANA launched the 767-300BCF program in 2005 and received delivery
of the first aircraft in June 2008. It currently has a firm order with SASCO for seven total
conversions of 767-300ERs. The 767-300BCF has similar cargo capabilities to the production
model 767-300F, carrying 50 tons structural payload at a range of approximately 3,000nm
and 412,000lbs MTOW.
According to Back Aviation Solutions as of September 2009, there are currently no Boeing
767-400ERs available for sale or lease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 11 of 17
|
|
|
Boeing 777-200ER
The widebody 777-200ER is the extended range version of the 777-200A. With an increased range
and gross-weight, this aircraft is the staple of the transatlantic crossing for many
operators who used to operate the DC-10 and 747. The new technology and operating economics
of the 777 have made it one of the most popular widebody aircraft of all times.
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet Status |
|
777-200ER |
|
Ordered |
|
|
511 |
|
Cancelled/Transferred |
|
|
79 |
|
Net Orders |
|
|
432 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
21 |
|
Delivered |
|
|
411 |
|
Destroyed/Retired |
|
|
1 |
|
Not in Service/Parked |
|
|
4 |
|
Active Aircraft |
|
|
406 |
|
Number of Operators |
|
|
31 |
|
Average Daily Utilization (Hrs) |
|
|
11.38 |
|
Average Fleet Age (Yrs) |
|
|
8.18 |
|
Source: AvSofts ACAS Database, August 2009
The 777 has become a replacement for the larger, less efficient Boeing 747-200s, along with the
older DC-10-30s and in many cases the MD-11. It does still, however, compete head-to-head with
the Airbus A330/A340 on range and capacity. The current order backlog for the Boeing 777-200ER
stands at 21. The 777-200ER market is still firm and looks to remain so for the near
future, even with the recent downturn in the economy. This is because international routes
for mainline operators remain lucrative due to passenger demand holding firm. Some operators may
choose to go for the longer range 777- 200LR or the larger capacity 777-300ER.
The A350XWB and the envisioned 787-10 could seriously impact 777-200ER residual values when
they enter service. However, the expected entry into service of the A350XWB is
currently 2013-2014 and Boeing is unlikely to launch the 787-10 until there is a competitor.
At that stage the oldest 777-200ER will be approaching 16 years of service and nearing
replacement.
According to Back Aviation Solutions, as of September 2009 there are currently 5 777-200ERs
available for sale or lease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 12 of 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 13 of 17
|
|
|
IV. Valuation
In developing the Values of the aircraft in this portfolio, mba did not inspect the aircraft or the
records and documentation associated with the aircraft, but relied on partial information supplied
by the Client. This information was not independently verified by mba. Therefore, we used
certain assumptions that are generally accepted industry practice to calculate the value of
aircraft when more detailed information is not available.
The principal assumptions for each of the aircraft in this portfolio are as follows:
1. |
|
The aircraft is in good overall condition. |
|
2. |
|
The overhaul status of the airframe, engines, landing gear and other major
components are the equivalent of mid-time/mid-life, or new, unless otherwise stated. |
|
3. |
|
The historical maintenance documentation has been maintained to acceptable
international standards. |
|
4. |
|
The specifications of the aircraft are those most common for an aircraft of its type and
vintage. |
|
5. |
|
The aircraft is in a standard airline configuration. |
|
6. |
|
The aircraft is current as to all Airworthiness Directives and Service Bulletins. |
|
7. |
|
Its modification status is comparable to that most common for an aircraft of its type and
vintage. |
|
8. |
|
Its utilization is comparable to industry averages. |
|
9. |
|
There is no history of accident or incident damage. |
|
10. |
|
In the case of the Base and Market Value, no accounting is made for lease revenues,
obligations or terms of ownership unless otherwise specified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 14 of 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental
Airlines Portfolio Description |
|
|
|
|
Aircraft |
|
Serial |
|
|
|
Manufacture |
|
MTOW |
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Type |
|
Number |
|
Registration |
|
Date |
|
(lbs) |
|
|
Engine Type |
|
Operator |
1 |
|
737-800 |
|
28947 |
|
N14235 |
|
Aug-99 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26 |
|
Continental |
2 |
|
737-800 |
|
30584 |
|
N37253 |
|
Sep-00 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26 |
|
Continental |
3 |
|
737-800 |
|
30779 |
|
N76254 |
|
Sep-00 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26 |
|
Continental |
4 |
|
757-200 |
|
30352 |
|
N17139 |
|
Feb-00 |
|
|
255,000 |
|
|
RB211-535E4B |
|
Continental |
5 |
|
757-200 |
|
30353 |
|
N41140 |
|
Feb-00 |
|
|
255,000 |
|
|
RB211-535E4B |
|
Continental |
6 |
|
757-200 |
|
30354 |
|
N19141 |
|
Jun-00 |
|
|
255,000 |
|
|
RB211-535E4B |
|
Continental |
7 |
|
767-400ER |
|
29447 |
|
N67052 |
|
Sep-00 |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
CF6-80C2B8F |
|
Continental |
8 |
|
777-200ER |
|
29859 |
|
N79011 |
|
Jun-99 |
|
|
656,000 |
|
|
GE90-94B |
|
Continental |
|
9 |
|
737-800 |
|
30132 |
|
N76519 |
|
Jan-10 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
Continental |
10 |
|
737-800 |
|
31658 |
|
N77520 |
|
Jan-10 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
Continental |
11 |
|
737-800 |
|
31662 |
|
N79521 |
|
Feb-10 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
Continental |
12 |
|
737-800 |
|
31660 |
|
N76522 |
|
Feb-10 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
Continental |
13 |
|
737-800 |
|
37101 |
|
N76523 |
|
Mar-10 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
Continental |
14 |
|
737-800 |
|
31642 |
|
N78524 |
|
Mar-10 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
Continental |
15 |
|
737-800 |
|
31659 |
|
N77525 |
|
Apr-10 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
Continental |
16 |
|
737-800 |
|
38700 |
|
N76526 |
|
May-10 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
Continental |
17 |
|
737-800 |
|
38701 |
|
N87527 |
|
Jun-10 |
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
CFM56-7B26/3 |
|
Continental |
18 |
|
777-200ER |
|
39776 |
|
N76021 |
|
Apr-10 |
|
|
656,000 |
|
|
GE90-94B |
|
Continental |
19 |
|
777-200ER |
|
39777 |
|
N77022 |
|
May-10 |
|
|
656,000 |
|
|
GE90-94B |
|
Continental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 15 of 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines Valuation |
|
($US Million) |
|
|
|
|
|
Serial |
|
Half Time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MX. Adj. |
|
No. |
|
Aircraft Type |
|
Number |
|
BV |
|
|
MX. Adj. |
|
|
CBV |
|
1 |
|
737-800 |
|
28947 |
|
|
26.68 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
29.21 |
|
2 |
|
737-800 |
|
30584 |
|
|
28.47 |
|
|
|
(0.35 |
) |
|
|
28.12 |
|
3 |
|
737-800 |
|
30779 |
|
|
28.47 |
|
|
|
(1.56 |
) |
|
|
26.91 |
|
4 |
|
757-200 |
|
30352 |
|
|
25.53 |
|
|
|
(1.87 |
) |
|
|
23.66 |
|
5 |
|
757-200 |
|
30353 |
|
|
25.53 |
|
|
|
(0.52 |
) |
|
|
25.01 |
|
6 |
|
757-200 |
|
30354 |
|
|
26.20 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
26.97 |
|
7 |
|
767-400ER |
|
29447 |
|
|
45.23 |
|
|
|
(0.58 |
) |
|
|
44.65 |
|
8 |
|
777-200ER |
|
29859 |
|
|
70.39 |
|
|
|
(1.86 |
) |
|
|
68.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
$ |
276.50 |
|
|
|
($3.44 |
) |
|
$ |
273.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New |
|
|
|
|
|
Serial |
|
Half Time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery |
|
No. |
|
Aircraft Type |
|
Number |
|
BV |
|
|
MX. Adj. |
|
|
BV |
|
9 |
|
737-800 |
|
30132 |
|
|
47.75 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
47.75 |
|
10 |
|
737-800 |
|
31658 |
|
|
47.75 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
47.75 |
|
11 |
|
737-800 |
|
31662 |
|
|
47.83 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
47.83 |
|
12 |
|
737-800 |
|
31660 |
|
|
47.83 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
47.83 |
|
13 |
|
737-800 |
|
37101 |
|
|
47.91 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
47.91 |
|
14 |
|
737-800 |
|
31642 |
|
|
47.91 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
47.91 |
|
15 |
|
737-800 |
|
31659 |
|
|
47.99 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
47.99 |
|
16 |
|
737-800 |
|
38700 |
|
|
48.07 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
48.07 |
|
17 |
|
737-800 |
|
38701 |
|
|
48.15 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
48.15 |
|
18 |
|
777-200ER |
|
39776 |
|
|
130.10 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
130.10 |
|
19 |
|
777-200ER |
|
39777 |
|
|
130.31 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
130.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
$ |
691.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
691.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Total |
|
$ |
968.10 |
|
|
|
($3.44 |
) |
|
$ |
964.66 |
|
Legend for Portfolio Valuation
|
|
|
Half Time BV
|
|
Half Time Base Value |
MX. Adj.
|
|
Maintenance Adjustments |
MX. Adj. CBV
|
|
Maintenance Adjusted Current Base Value |
New Delivery BV
|
|
New Delivery Base Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 16 of 17
|
|
|
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of
Continental Airlines, Inc and shall not be provided to other parties by mba without the
express consent of Continental Airlines, Inc. mba certifies that this report has been
independently prepared and that it fully and accurately reflects mbas opinion as to the
Maintenance Adjusted Current Base Values and the New Delivery Base Values, as requested.
mba further certifies that it does not have, and does not expect to have, any financial
or other interest in the subject or similar aircraft and engine.
This report represents the opinion of mba as to the Maintenance Adjusted
Current Base Values and the New Delivery Base Values of the subject aircraft,
as requested, and is intended to be advisory only, in nature. Therefore, mba
assumes no responsibility or legal liability for any actions taken, or not taken,
by Continental Airlines, Inc. or any other party with regard to the subject aircraft
and engine. By accepting this report, all parties agree that mba shall bear no such
responsibility or legal liability.
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 26, 2009
|
|
Stephen P. Rehrmann, ATP/FE |
|
|
Vice President Appraisal Group |
|
|
Morten Beyer & Agnew, Inc. |
|
|
ISTAT Certified Appraiser |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continental Airlines
Job File #09237
Page 17 of 17
|
|
|
APPENDIX III
SUMMARY OF APPRAISED VALUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appraisers Valuations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AISI
|
|
|
BK
|
|
|
MBA
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
Registration
|
|
|
Manufacturers
|
|
Delivery
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
Maint. Adj.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
Maint. Adj.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
Maint. Adj.
|
|
Type
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Serial Number
|
|
Month
|
|
|
Base Value
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Base Value
|
|
|
Base Value
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Base Value
|
|
|
Base Value
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Base Value
|
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N14235
|
|
|
28947
|
|
|
August 1999
|
|
|
$
|
23,550,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,150,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
28,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,390,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,590,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,680,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,530,000
|
|
|
$
|
29,210,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N37253
|
|
|
30584
|
|
|
September 2000
|
|
|
|
25,130,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
26,030,000
|
|
|
|
30,400,000
|
|
|
|
930,000
|
|
|
|
31,330,000
|
|
|
|
28,470,000
|
|
|
|
(350,000
|
)
|
|
|
28,120,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N76254
|
|
|
30779
|
|
|
September 2000
|
|
|
|
25,130,000
|
|
|
|
(210,000
|
)
|
|
|
24,920,000
|
|
|
|
30,400,000
|
|
|
|
(170,000
|
)
|
|
|
30,230,000
|
|
|
|
28,470,000
|
|
|
|
(1,560,000
|
)
|
|
|
26,910,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N76519
|
|
|
30132
|
|
|
January 2010
|
|
|
|
58,210,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,210,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,750,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N77520
|
|
|
31658
|
|
|
January 2010
|
|
|
|
58,210,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,210,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,750,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N79521
|
|
|
31662
|
|
|
February 2010
|
|
|
|
58,360,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,360,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,830,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,830,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N76522
|
|
|
31660
|
|
|
February 2010
|
|
|
|
58,360,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,360,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,830,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,830,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N76523
|
|
|
37101
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
|
58,520,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,520,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,910,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,910,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N78524
|
|
|
31642
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
|
58,520,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,520,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,910,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,910,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N77525
|
|
|
31659
|
|
|
April 2010
|
|
|
|
58,670,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,670,000
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,400,000
|
|
|
|
47,990,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,990,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N76526
|
|
|
38700
|
|
|
May 2010
|
|
|
|
58,820,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,820,000
|
|
|
|
49,550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,550,000
|
|
|
|
48,070,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,070,000
|
|
Boeing
737-824
|
|
|
N87527
|
|
|
38701
|
|
|
June 2010
|
|
|
|
58,970,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,970,000
|
|
|
|
49,550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,550,000
|
|
|
|
48,150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing
757-224
|
|
|
N17139
|
|
|
30352
|
|
|
February 2000
|
|
|
|
24,410,000
|
|
|
|
(700,000
|
)
|
|
|
23,710,000
|
|
|
|
23,500,000
|
|
|
|
(1,780,000
|
)
|
|
|
21,720,000
|
|
|
|
25,530,000
|
|
|
|
(1,870,000
|
)
|
|
|
23,660,000
|
|
Boeing
757-224
|
|
|
N41140
|
|
|
30353
|
|
|
February 2000
|
|
|
|
24,410,000
|
|
|
|
(2,440,000
|
)
|
|
|
21,970,000
|
|
|
|
23,500,000
|
|
|
|
310,000
|
|
|
|
23,810,000
|
|
|
|
25,530,000
|
|
|
|
(520,000
|
)
|
|
|
25,010,000
|
|
Boeing
757-224
|
|
|
N19141
|
|
|
30354
|
|
|
June 2000
|
|
|
|
24,410,000
|
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
|
25,510,000
|
|
|
|
23,750,000
|
|
|
|
1,690,000
|
|
|
|
25,440,000
|
|
|
|
26,200,000
|
|
|
|
770,000
|
|
|
|
26,970,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing
767-424ER
|
|
|
N67052
|
|
|
29447
|
|
|
September 2000
|
|
|
|
38,780,000
|
|
|
|
(740,000
|
)
|
|
|
38,040,000
|
|
|
|
53,900,000
|
|
|
|
(2,740,000
|
)
|
|
|
51,160,000
|
|
|
|
45,230,000
|
|
|
|
(580,000
|
)
|
|
|
44,650,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing
777-224ER
|
|
|
N79011
|
|
|
29859
|
|
|
June 1999
|
|
|
|
71,640,000
|
|
|
|
830,000
|
|
|
|
72,470,000
|
|
|
|
75,450,000
|
|
|
|
(2,070,000
|
)
|
|
|
73,380,000
|
|
|
|
70,390,000
|
|
|
|
(1,860,000
|
)
|
|
|
68,530,000
|
|
Boeing
777-224ER
|
|
|
N76021
|
|
|
39776
|
|
|
April 2010
|
|
|
|
157,960,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,960,000
|
|
|
|
128,950,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,950,000
|
|
|
|
130,100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,100,000
|
|
Boeing
777-224ER
|
|
|
N77022
|
|
|
39777
|
|
|
May 2010
|
|
|
|
158,370,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,370,000
|
|
|
|
128,950,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,950,000
|
|
|
|
130,310,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,310,000
|
|
III-1
APPENDIX IV
LOAN TO VALUE RATIO TABLES
The following tables set forth loan to Aircraft value ratios for
the Equipment Notes that may be issued in respect of each of the
19 aircraft that may be financed pursuant to this Offering
(including nine new Boeing
737-824
aircraft from which Continental may choose seven to be so
financed), as of initial issuance and the Regular Distribution
Dates thereafter. The loan to value ratio was obtained by
dividing (i) the outstanding balance (assuming no payment
default) of such Equipment Notes plus, in the case of the
Series B Equipment Notes, the outstanding balance (assuming
no payment default) of the Series A Equipment Notes,
determined immediately after giving effect to the payments
scheduled to be made on each such Regular Distribution Date by
(ii) the appraised value of the Aircraft securing such
Equipment Notes (see Description of the Aircraft and the
Appraisals The Appraisals), subject to the
Depreciation Assumption. The Depreciation Assumption
contemplates that the value of each Aircraft at issuance of the
Equipment Notes included in each table depreciates by
approximately 3% of the initial appraised value per year for the
first 15 years after the year of delivery of such Aircraft,
4% of such appraised value per year for each of the next five
years and 5% of such appraised value per year for any subsequent
year, in each case prior to the final expected Regular
Distribution Date. Other rates or methods of depreciation may
result in materially different loan to Aircraft value ratios,
and no assurance can be given (i) that the depreciation
rates and method assumed for the purposes of the tables are the
ones most likely to occur or (ii) as to the actual future
value of any Aircraft. Thus, the tables should not be considered
a forecast or prediction of expected or likely loan to Aircraft
value ratios, but simply a mathematical calculation based on one
set of assumptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N14235
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
28,833,333.33
|
|
|
$
|
15,570,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
3,447,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
28,201,946.47
|
|
|
|
15,570,000.00
|
|
|
|
3,447,000.00
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
27,570,559.61
|
|
|
|
14,930,311.90
|
|
|
|
3,228,921.43
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
|
|
65.9
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
26,939,172.75
|
|
|
|
14,539,316.25
|
|
|
|
3,024,508.75
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
26,307,785.89
|
|
|
|
14,079,059.31
|
|
|
|
2,818,921.65
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
64.2
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
25,676,399.03
|
|
|
|
13,619,422.24
|
|
|
|
2,614,774.19
|
|
|
|
53.0
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
25,045,012.17
|
|
|
|
13,160,540.41
|
|
|
|
2,410,159.83
|
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
24,413,625.30
|
|
|
|
12,702,463.83
|
|
|
|
2,205,955.34
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
23,782,238.44
|
|
|
|
12,245,247.07
|
|
|
|
2,000,643.89
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
59.9
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
23,150,851.58
|
|
|
|
11,788,322.64
|
|
|
|
1,795,905.10
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
22,309,002.43
|
|
|
|
11,331,131.28
|
|
|
|
1,593,410.38
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
57.9
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
21,467,153.28
|
|
|
|
10,768,243.18
|
|
|
|
1,380,681.82
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
20,625,304.14
|
|
|
|
10,207,333.52
|
|
|
|
1,173,286.12
|
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
19,783,454.99
|
|
|
|
9,649,012.44
|
|
|
|
971,457.56
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
18,941,605.84
|
|
|
|
9,197,360.75
|
|
|
|
774,729.96
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
18,099,756.69
|
|
|
|
8,747,788.47
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
17,257,907.54
|
|
|
|
8,300,459.88
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
16,416,058.39
|
|
|
|
7,855,557.06
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
15,574,209.25
|
|
|
|
7,413,282.34
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
14,732,360.10
|
|
|
|
6,973,861.18
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
13,680,048.66
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N37253
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
28,120,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
15,185,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
3,362,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
27,542,191.78
|
|
|
|
15,185,000.00
|
|
|
|
3,362,000.00
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
26,964,383.56
|
|
|
|
14,587,731.51
|
|
|
|
3,154,832.88
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
26,386,575.34
|
|
|
|
14,219,649.72
|
|
|
|
2,958,010.83
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
25,808,767.12
|
|
|
|
13,783,645.99
|
|
|
|
2,759,773.73
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
25,230,958.90
|
|
|
|
13,347,981.95
|
|
|
|
2,562,660.74
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
24,653,150.68
|
|
|
|
12,912,772.67
|
|
|
|
2,364,784.81
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
24,075,342.47
|
|
|
|
12,478,048.29
|
|
|
|
2,166,982.53
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
23,497,534.25
|
|
|
|
12,043,841.65
|
|
|
|
1,967,738.02
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
22,919,726.03
|
|
|
|
11,609,571.08
|
|
|
|
1,768,673.00
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
22,341,917.81
|
|
|
|
11,174,657.45
|
|
|
|
1,571,406.66
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
21,764,109.59
|
|
|
|
10,735,272.58
|
|
|
|
1,376,454.40
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
21,186,301.37
|
|
|
|
10,294,386.32
|
|
|
|
1,183,292.44
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
20,415,890.41
|
|
|
|
9,760,190.61
|
|
|
|
982,650.93
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
19,645,479.45
|
|
|
|
9,333,213.12
|
|
|
|
786,173.34
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
18,875,068.49
|
|
|
|
8,907,944.09
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
18,104,657.53
|
|
|
|
8,484,518.49
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
17,334,246.58
|
|
|
|
8,063,085.93
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
16,563,835.62
|
|
|
|
7,643,812.63
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
15,793,424.66
|
|
|
|
7,226,883.84
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
15,023,013.70
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N76254
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
26,910,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
14,531,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
3,217,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
26,357,054.79
|
|
|
|
14,531,000.00
|
|
|
|
3,217,000.00
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
25,804,109.59
|
|
|
|
13,960,023.29
|
|
|
|
3,019,080.82
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
25,251,164.38
|
|
|
|
13,607,780.01
|
|
|
|
2,830,728.00
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
24,698,219.18
|
|
|
|
13,190,537.47
|
|
|
|
2,641,021.02
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
24,145,273.97
|
|
|
|
12,773,619.99
|
|
|
|
2,452,389.77
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
23,592,328.77
|
|
|
|
12,357,137.72
|
|
|
|
2,263,028.42
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
23,039,383.56
|
|
|
|
11,941,119.47
|
|
|
|
2,073,737.55
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
22,486,438.36
|
|
|
|
11,525,596.69
|
|
|
|
1,883,066.50
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
21,933,493.15
|
|
|
|
11,110,012.73
|
|
|
|
1,692,567.23
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
21,380,547.95
|
|
|
|
10,693,813.37
|
|
|
|
1,503,789.24
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
20,827,602.74
|
|
|
|
10,273,335.18
|
|
|
|
1,317,225.75
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
20,274,657.53
|
|
|
|
9,851,420.20
|
|
|
|
1,132,375.52
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
19,537,397.26
|
|
|
|
9,340,210.86
|
|
|
|
940,367.58
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
18,800,136.99
|
|
|
|
8,931,606.16
|
|
|
|
752,344.40
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
18,062,876.71
|
|
|
|
8,524,636.39
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
17,325,616.44
|
|
|
|
8,119,430.75
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
16,588,356.16
|
|
|
|
7,716,132.37
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
15,851,095.89
|
|
|
|
7,314,900.35
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
15,113,835.62
|
|
|
|
6,915,911.96
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
14,376,575.34
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N76519
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
49,400,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
48,659,000.00
|
|
|
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
67.0
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
47,918,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,923,638.00
|
|
|
|
5,606,406.00
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,177,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,423,549.89
|
|
|
|
5,288,677.11
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
46,436,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,799,998.47
|
|
|
|
4,965,477.53
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
45,695,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,174,112.34
|
|
|
|
4,641,154.66
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
44,954,000.00
|
|
|
|
23,545,906.57
|
|
|
|
4,312,087.23
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,213,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,915,227.47
|
|
|
|
3,979,540.43
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
43,472,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,281,907.49
|
|
|
|
3,640,446.11
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
42,731,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,644,612.22
|
|
|
|
3,297,472.48
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
41,990,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,001,951.14
|
|
|
|
2,953,343.86
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,249,000.00
|
|
|
|
20,346,307.16
|
|
|
|
2,608,761.34
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
40,508,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,682,765.48
|
|
|
|
2,262,443.52
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,767,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,011,343.23
|
|
|
|
1,914,052.17
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,026,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,540,549.05
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
38,285,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,068,312.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
37,544,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,594,520.17
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,803,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,119,045.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,062,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,641,747.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
35,321,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
34,580,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N77520
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
49,400,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
48,659,000.00
|
|
|
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
67.0
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
47,918,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,923,638.00
|
|
|
|
5,606,406.00
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,177,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,423,549.89
|
|
|
|
5,288,677.11
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
46,436,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,799,998.47
|
|
|
|
4,965,477.53
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
45,695,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,174,112.34
|
|
|
|
4,641,154.66
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
44,954,000.00
|
|
|
|
23,545,906.57
|
|
|
|
4,312,087.23
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,213,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,915,227.47
|
|
|
|
3,979,540.43
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
43,472,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,281,907.49
|
|
|
|
3,640,446.11
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
42,731,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,644,612.22
|
|
|
|
3,297,472.48
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
41,990,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,001,951.14
|
|
|
|
2,953,343.86
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,249,000.00
|
|
|
|
20,346,307.16
|
|
|
|
2,608,761.34
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
40,508,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,682,765.48
|
|
|
|
2,262,443.52
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,767,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,011,343.23
|
|
|
|
1,914,052.17
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,026,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,540,549.05
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
38,285,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,068,312.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
37,544,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,594,520.17
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,803,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,119,045.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,062,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,641,747.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
35,321,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
34,580,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N79521
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
49,400,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
48,659,000.00
|
|
|
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
67.0
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
47,918,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,923,638.00
|
|
|
|
5,606,406.00
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,177,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,423,549.89
|
|
|
|
5,288,677.11
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
46,436,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,799,998.47
|
|
|
|
4,965,477.53
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
45,695,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,174,112.34
|
|
|
|
4,641,154.66
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
44,954,000.00
|
|
|
|
23,545,906.57
|
|
|
|
4,312,087.23
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,213,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,915,227.47
|
|
|
|
3,979,540.43
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
43,472,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,281,907.49
|
|
|
|
3,640,446.11
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
42,731,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,644,612.22
|
|
|
|
3,297,472.48
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
41,990,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,001,951.14
|
|
|
|
2,953,343.86
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,249,000.00
|
|
|
|
20,346,307.16
|
|
|
|
2,608,761.34
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
40,508,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,682,765.48
|
|
|
|
2,262,443.52
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,767,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,011,343.23
|
|
|
|
1,914,052.17
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,026,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,540,549.05
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
38,285,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,068,312.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
37,544,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,594,520.17
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,803,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,119,045.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,062,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,641,747.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
35,321,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
34,580,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N76522
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
49,400,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
48,659,000.00
|
|
|
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
67.0
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
47,918,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,923,638.00
|
|
|
|
5,606,406.00
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,177,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,423,549.89
|
|
|
|
5,288,677.11
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
46,436,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,799,998.47
|
|
|
|
4,965,477.53
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
45,695,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,174,112.34
|
|
|
|
4,641,154.66
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
44,954,000.00
|
|
|
|
23,545,906.57
|
|
|
|
4,312,087.23
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,213,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,915,227.47
|
|
|
|
3,979,540.43
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
43,472,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,281,907.49
|
|
|
|
3,640,446.11
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
42,731,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,644,612.22
|
|
|
|
3,297,472.48
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
41,990,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,001,951.14
|
|
|
|
2,953,343.86
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,249,000.00
|
|
|
|
20,346,307.16
|
|
|
|
2,608,761.34
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
40,508,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,682,765.48
|
|
|
|
2,262,443.52
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,767,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,011,343.23
|
|
|
|
1,914,052.17
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,026,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,540,549.05
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
38,285,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,068,312.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
37,544,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,594,520.17
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,803,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,119,045.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,062,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,641,747.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
35,321,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
34,580,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N76523
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
49,400,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
49,400,000.00
|
|
|
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
48,659,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,923,638.00
|
|
|
|
5,606,406.00
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
|
|
64.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,918,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,423,549.89
|
|
|
|
5,288,677.11
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,177,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,799,998.47
|
|
|
|
4,965,477.53
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
46,436,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,174,112.34
|
|
|
|
4,641,154.66
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
45,695,000.00
|
|
|
|
23,545,906.57
|
|
|
|
4,312,087.23
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,954,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,915,227.47
|
|
|
|
3,979,540.43
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,213,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,281,907.49
|
|
|
|
3,640,446.11
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
43,472,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,644,612.22
|
|
|
|
3,297,472.48
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
42,731,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,001,951.14
|
|
|
|
2,953,343.86
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,990,000.00
|
|
|
|
20,346,307.16
|
|
|
|
2,608,761.34
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,249,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,682,765.48
|
|
|
|
2,262,443.52
|
|
|
|
47.7
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
40,508,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,011,343.23
|
|
|
|
1,914,052.17
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,767,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,540,549.05
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
|
|
46.6
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
39,026,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,068,312.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
38,285,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,594,520.17
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
37,544,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,119,045.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,803,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,641,747.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
36,062,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
35,321,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N78524
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
49,400,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
49,400,000.00
|
|
|
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
48,659,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,923,638.00
|
|
|
|
5,606,406.00
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
|
|
64.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,918,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,423,549.89
|
|
|
|
5,288,677.11
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,177,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,799,998.47
|
|
|
|
4,965,477.53
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
46,436,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,174,112.34
|
|
|
|
4,641,154.66
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
45,695,000.00
|
|
|
|
23,545,906.57
|
|
|
|
4,312,087.23
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,954,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,915,227.47
|
|
|
|
3,979,540.43
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,213,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,281,907.49
|
|
|
|
3,640,446.11
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
43,472,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,644,612.22
|
|
|
|
3,297,472.48
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
42,731,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,001,951.14
|
|
|
|
2,953,343.86
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,990,000.00
|
|
|
|
20,346,307.16
|
|
|
|
2,608,761.34
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,249,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,682,765.48
|
|
|
|
2,262,443.52
|
|
|
|
47.7
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
40,508,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,011,343.23
|
|
|
|
1,914,052.17
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,767,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,540,549.05
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
|
|
46.6
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
39,026,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,068,312.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
38,285,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,594,520.17
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
37,544,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,119,045.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,803,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,641,747.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
36,062,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
35,321,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N77525
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
49,400,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
49,400,000.00
|
|
|
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
48,659,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,923,638.00
|
|
|
|
5,606,406.00
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
|
|
64.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,918,000.00
|
|
|
|
25,423,549.89
|
|
|
|
5,288,677.11
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,177,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,799,998.47
|
|
|
|
4,965,477.53
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
46,436,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,174,112.34
|
|
|
|
4,641,154.66
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
45,695,000.00
|
|
|
|
23,545,906.57
|
|
|
|
4,312,087.23
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,954,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,915,227.47
|
|
|
|
3,979,540.43
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,213,000.00
|
|
|
|
22,281,907.49
|
|
|
|
3,640,446.11
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
43,472,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,644,612.22
|
|
|
|
3,297,472.48
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
42,731,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,001,951.14
|
|
|
|
2,953,343.86
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,990,000.00
|
|
|
|
20,346,307.16
|
|
|
|
2,608,761.34
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,249,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,682,765.48
|
|
|
|
2,262,443.52
|
|
|
|
47.7
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
40,508,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,011,343.23
|
|
|
|
1,914,052.17
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,767,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,540,549.05
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
|
|
46.6
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
39,026,000.00
|
|
|
|
18,068,312.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
38,285,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,594,520.17
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
37,544,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,119,045.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,803,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,641,747.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
36,062,000.00
|
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
35,321,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N76526
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
49,550,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
%
|
|
|
65.8
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
49,550,000.00
|
|
|
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
48,806,750.00
|
|
|
|
25,923,638.00
|
|
|
|
5,606,406.00
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
48,063,500.00
|
|
|
|
25,423,549.89
|
|
|
|
5,288,677.11
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.9
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,320,250.00
|
|
|
|
24,799,998.47
|
|
|
|
4,965,477.53
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.9
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
46,577,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,174,112.34
|
|
|
|
4,641,154.66
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
61.9
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
45,833,750.00
|
|
|
|
23,545,906.57
|
|
|
|
4,312,087.23
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
45,090,500.00
|
|
|
|
22,915,227.47
|
|
|
|
3,979,540.43
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,347,250.00
|
|
|
|
22,281,907.49
|
|
|
|
3,640,446.11
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
43,604,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,644,612.22
|
|
|
|
3,297,472.48
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
57.2
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
42,860,750.00
|
|
|
|
21,001,951.14
|
|
|
|
2,953,343.86
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
42,117,500.00
|
|
|
|
20,346,307.16
|
|
|
|
2,608,761.34
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,374,250.00
|
|
|
|
19,682,765.48
|
|
|
|
2,262,443.52
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
53.0
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
40,631,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,011,343.23
|
|
|
|
1,914,052.17
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,887,750.00
|
|
|
|
18,540,549.05
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
39,144,500.00
|
|
|
|
18,068,312.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
38,401,250.00
|
|
|
|
17,594,520.17
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
37,658,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,119,045.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,914,750.00
|
|
|
|
16,641,747.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
36,171,500.00
|
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
35,428,250.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N87527
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
49,550,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
%
|
|
|
65.8
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
49,550,000.00
|
|
|
|
26,676,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,906,000.00
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
48,806,750.00
|
|
|
|
25,923,638.00
|
|
|
|
5,606,406.00
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
48,063,500.00
|
|
|
|
25,423,549.89
|
|
|
|
5,288,677.11
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.9
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
47,320,250.00
|
|
|
|
24,799,998.47
|
|
|
|
4,965,477.53
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.9
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
46,577,000.00
|
|
|
|
24,174,112.34
|
|
|
|
4,641,154.66
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
61.9
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
45,833,750.00
|
|
|
|
23,545,906.57
|
|
|
|
4,312,087.23
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
45,090,500.00
|
|
|
|
22,915,227.47
|
|
|
|
3,979,540.43
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
44,347,250.00
|
|
|
|
22,281,907.49
|
|
|
|
3,640,446.11
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
43,604,000.00
|
|
|
|
21,644,612.22
|
|
|
|
3,297,472.48
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
57.2
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
42,860,750.00
|
|
|
|
21,001,951.14
|
|
|
|
2,953,343.86
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
42,117,500.00
|
|
|
|
20,346,307.16
|
|
|
|
2,608,761.34
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
41,374,250.00
|
|
|
|
19,682,765.48
|
|
|
|
2,262,443.52
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
53.0
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
40,631,000.00
|
|
|
|
19,011,343.23
|
|
|
|
1,914,052.17
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
39,887,750.00
|
|
|
|
18,540,549.05
|
|
|
|
1,561,743.55
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
39,144,500.00
|
|
|
|
18,068,312.68
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
38,401,250.00
|
|
|
|
17,594,520.17
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
37,658,000.00
|
|
|
|
17,119,045.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
36,914,750.00
|
|
|
|
16,641,747.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
36,171,500.00
|
|
|
|
16,162,470.76
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
35,428,250.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N17139
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
23,030,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
12,436,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
2,753,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
22,536,500.00
|
|
|
|
12,436,000.00
|
|
|
|
2,753,000.00
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
22,043,000.00
|
|
|
|
11,925,263.00
|
|
|
|
2,579,031.00
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
21,549,500.00
|
|
|
|
11,612,963.70
|
|
|
|
2,415,760.80
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
21,056,000.00
|
|
|
|
11,245,343.44
|
|
|
|
2,251,552.56
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
20,562,500.00
|
|
|
|
10,878,218.30
|
|
|
|
2,088,494.20
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
20,069,000.00
|
|
|
|
10,511,696.38
|
|
|
|
1,925,062.92
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
19,575,500.00
|
|
|
|
10,145,817.64
|
|
|
|
1,761,959.01
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
19,082,000.00
|
|
|
|
9,780,625.66
|
|
|
|
1,597,970.94
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
18,588,500.00
|
|
|
|
9,415,667.18
|
|
|
|
1,434,440.27
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
18,095,000.00
|
|
|
|
9,050,495.50
|
|
|
|
1,272,702.00
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
17,437,000.00
|
|
|
|
8,600,900.82
|
|
|
|
1,102,789.68
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
16,779,000.00
|
|
|
|
8,152,886.39
|
|
|
|
937,136.86
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
16,121,000.00
|
|
|
|
7,706,939.53
|
|
|
|
775,930.67
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
15,463,000.00
|
|
|
|
7,346,192.54
|
|
|
|
618,798.76
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
14,805,000.00
|
|
|
|
6,987,106.42
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
14,147,000.00
|
|
|
|
6,629,812.40
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
13,489,000.00
|
|
|
|
6,274,455.92
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
12,831,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,921,198.57
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
12,173,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,570,220.45
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
11,515,000.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N41140
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
23,596,666.67
|
|
|
$
|
12,742,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
2,821,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
23,101,631.70
|
|
|
|
12,742,000.00
|
|
|
|
2,821,000.00
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
22,606,596.74
|
|
|
|
12,230,168.83
|
|
|
|
2,644,971.82
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
22,111,561.77
|
|
|
|
11,915,857.17
|
|
|
|
2,478,769.54
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
21,616,526.81
|
|
|
|
11,544,703.07
|
|
|
|
2,311,490.61
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
21,121,491.84
|
|
|
|
11,173,942.81
|
|
|
|
2,145,269.95
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
20,626,456.88
|
|
|
|
10,803,679.91
|
|
|
|
1,978,535.42
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
20,131,421.91
|
|
|
|
10,433,947.31
|
|
|
|
1,811,996.64
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
19,636,386.95
|
|
|
|
10,064,780.95
|
|
|
|
1,644,396.59
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
19,141,351.98
|
|
|
|
9,695,704.31
|
|
|
|
1,477,102.84
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
18,646,317.02
|
|
|
|
9,326,245.27
|
|
|
|
1,311,478.59
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
18,151,282.05
|
|
|
|
8,953,224.56
|
|
|
|
1,147,963.90
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
17,491,235.43
|
|
|
|
8,498,960.33
|
|
|
|
976,916.47
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
16,831,188.81
|
|
|
|
8,046,458.31
|
|
|
|
810,113.25
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
16,171,142.19
|
|
|
|
7,682,618.13
|
|
|
|
647,137.22
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
15,511,095.57
|
|
|
|
7,320,342.82
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
14,851,048.95
|
|
|
|
6,959,756.03
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
14,191,002.33
|
|
|
|
6,600,994.78
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
13,530,955.71
|
|
|
|
6,244,211.34
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
12,870,909.09
|
|
|
|
5,889,575.38
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
12,210,862.47
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N19141
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
25,510,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
13,775,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
3,050,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
24,974,825.17
|
|
|
|
13,775,000.00
|
|
|
|
3,050,000.00
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
24,439,650.35
|
|
|
|
13,221,850.84
|
|
|
|
2,859,439.09
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
23,904,475.52
|
|
|
|
12,882,053.25
|
|
|
|
2,679,760.32
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
23,369,300.70
|
|
|
|
12,480,804.15
|
|
|
|
2,498,917.59
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
22,834,125.87
|
|
|
|
12,079,980.83
|
|
|
|
2,319,218.94
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
22,298,951.05
|
|
|
|
11,679,695.20
|
|
|
|
2,138,964.76
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
21,763,776.22
|
|
|
|
11,279,982.87
|
|
|
|
1,958,922.20
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
21,228,601.40
|
|
|
|
10,880,882.70
|
|
|
|
1,777,732.32
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
20,693,426.57
|
|
|
|
10,481,879.52
|
|
|
|
1,596,873.57
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
20,158,251.75
|
|
|
|
10,082,462.93
|
|
|
|
1,417,819.70
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
19,623,076.92
|
|
|
|
9,679,195.87
|
|
|
|
1,241,046.44
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
18,909,510.49
|
|
|
|
9,188,097.67
|
|
|
|
1,056,129.64
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
18,195,944.06
|
|
|
|
8,698,904.56
|
|
|
|
875,801.20
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
17,482,377.62
|
|
|
|
8,305,562.44
|
|
|
|
699,610.27
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
16,768,811.19
|
|
|
|
7,913,912.08
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
16,055,244.76
|
|
|
|
7,524,087.14
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
15,341,678.32
|
|
|
|
7,136,235.78
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
14,628,111.89
|
|
|
|
6,750,522.58
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
13,914,545.45
|
|
|
|
6,367,131.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
13,200,979.02
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N67052
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
44,616,666.67
|
|
|
$
|
24,093,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
5,334,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
43,699,885.84
|
|
|
|
24,093,000.00
|
|
|
|
5,334,000.00
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
42,783,105.02
|
|
|
|
23,145,659.82
|
|
|
|
5,005,623.29
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
41,866,324.20
|
|
|
|
22,561,641.95
|
|
|
|
4,693,335.11
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
40,949,543.38
|
|
|
|
21,869,855.57
|
|
|
|
4,378,801.73
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
40,032,762.56
|
|
|
|
21,178,608.15
|
|
|
|
4,066,051.92
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
39,115,981.74
|
|
|
|
20,488,082.29
|
|
|
|
3,752,091.59
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
38,199,200.91
|
|
|
|
19,798,325.79
|
|
|
|
3,438,248.12
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
37,282,420.09
|
|
|
|
19,109,390.77
|
|
|
|
3,122,116.33
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
36,365,639.27
|
|
|
|
18,420,354.31
|
|
|
|
2,806,269.33
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
35,448,858.45
|
|
|
|
17,730,297.53
|
|
|
|
2,493,276.22
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
34,532,077.63
|
|
|
|
17,033,146.46
|
|
|
|
2,183,954.74
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
33,615,296.80
|
|
|
|
16,333,613.20
|
|
|
|
1,877,473.85
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
32,392,922.37
|
|
|
|
15,486,030.26
|
|
|
|
1,559,125.49
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
31,170,547.95
|
|
|
|
14,808,565.39
|
|
|
|
1,247,383.85
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
29,948,173.52
|
|
|
|
14,133,811.24
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
28,725,799.09
|
|
|
|
13,461,981.98
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
27,503,424.66
|
|
|
|
12,793,314.97
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
26,281,050.23
|
|
|
|
12,128,073.97
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
25,058,675.80
|
|
|
|
11,466,552.90
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
23,836,301.37
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N79011
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
71,460,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
38,588,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
8,543,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
69,895,182.48
|
|
|
|
38,588,000.00
|
|
|
|
8,543,000.00
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
68,330,364.96
|
|
|
|
36,966,727.45
|
|
|
|
7,994,652.70
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
66,765,547.45
|
|
|
|
35,979,761.89
|
|
|
|
7,484,609.50
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
65,200,729.93
|
|
|
|
34,821,647.06
|
|
|
|
6,972,020.83
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
63,635,912.41
|
|
|
|
33,665,427.20
|
|
|
|
6,463,379.17
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
62,071,094.89
|
|
|
|
32,511,460.63
|
|
|
|
5,953,996.87
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
60,506,277.37
|
|
|
|
31,359,896.63
|
|
|
|
5,446,071.90
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
58,941,459.85
|
|
|
|
30,210,897.96
|
|
|
|
4,935,894.55
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
57,376,642.34
|
|
|
|
29,063,096.43
|
|
|
|
4,427,649.70
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
55,290,218.98
|
|
|
|
27,654,262.38
|
|
|
|
3,888,807.54
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
53,203,795.62
|
|
|
|
26,243,079.05
|
|
|
|
3,364,833.21
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
51,117,372.26
|
|
|
|
24,837,840.67
|
|
|
|
2,854,995.75
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
49,030,948.91
|
|
|
|
23,440,143.80
|
|
|
|
2,359,941.51
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
46,944,525.55
|
|
|
|
22,302,497.78
|
|
|
|
1,878,627.33
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
44,858,102.19
|
|
|
|
21,170,437.94
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
42,771,678.83
|
|
|
|
20,044,405.66
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
40,685,255.47
|
|
|
|
18,924,890.07
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
38,598,832.12
|
|
|
|
17,812,434.71
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
36,512,408.76
|
|
|
|
16,707,645.28
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
33,904,379.56
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N76021
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
130,100,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
70,254,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
15,553,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
130,100,000.00
|
|
|
|
70,254,000.00
|
|
|
|
15,553,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
128,148,500.00
|
|
|
|
69,328,338.50
|
|
|
|
14,993,374.50
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
126,197,000.00
|
|
|
|
68,007,201.09
|
|
|
|
14,147,045.91
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
124,245,500.00
|
|
|
|
66,355,590.72
|
|
|
|
13,285,774.78
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
122,294,000.00
|
|
|
|
64,697,426.31
|
|
|
|
12,421,170.09
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
120,342,500.00
|
|
|
|
63,032,728.16
|
|
|
|
11,543,519.09
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
118,391,000.00
|
|
|
|
61,361,063.39
|
|
|
|
10,656,181.91
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
116,439,500.00
|
|
|
|
59,681,960.06
|
|
|
|
9,750,913.79
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
114,488,000.00
|
|
|
|
57,991,817.73
|
|
|
|
8,834,827.87
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
112,536,500.00
|
|
|
|
56,286,879.60
|
|
|
|
7,915,193.65
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
110,585,000.00
|
|
|
|
54,546,689.07
|
|
|
|
6,993,863.43
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
108,633,500.00
|
|
|
|
52,784,825.30
|
|
|
|
6,067,373.32
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
106,682,000.00
|
|
|
|
51,001,285.45
|
|
|
|
5,134,782.95
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
104,730,500.00
|
|
|
|
49,755,572.49
|
|
|
|
4,191,108.06
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
102,779,000.00
|
|
|
|
48,505,762.28
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
100,827,500.00
|
|
|
|
47,251,531.07
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
98,876,000.00
|
|
|
|
45,992,520.10
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
96,924,500.00
|
|
|
|
44,728,330.70
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
94,973,000.00
|
|
|
|
43,458,518.61
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
93,021,500.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N77022
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
Loan to Value Ratio
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
|
Series A
|
|
Series B
|
Date
|
|
Aircraft Value
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
At Issuance
|
|
$
|
130,310,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
70,367,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
15,578,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
May 10, 2010
|
|
|
130,310,000.00
|
|
|
|
70,367,000.00
|
|
|
|
15,578,000.00
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
November 10, 2010
|
|
|
128,355,350.00
|
|
|
|
69,440,244.35
|
|
|
|
15,017,575.95
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
|
126,400,700.00
|
|
|
|
68,116,974.43
|
|
|
|
14,169,881.27
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
|
124,446,050.00
|
|
|
|
66,462,698.13
|
|
|
|
13,307,219.92
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
May 10, 2012
|
|
|
122,491,400.00
|
|
|
|
64,801,857.20
|
|
|
|
12,441,219.64
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
November 10, 2012
|
|
|
120,536,750.00
|
|
|
|
63,134,471.99
|
|
|
|
11,562,151.98
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
May 10, 2013
|
|
|
118,582,100.00
|
|
|
|
61,460,108.92
|
|
|
|
10,673,382.51
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
November 10, 2013
|
|
|
116,627,450.00
|
|
|
|
59,778,295.27
|
|
|
|
9,766,653.16
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
May 10, 2014
|
|
|
114,672,800.00
|
|
|
|
58,085,424.82
|
|
|
|
8,849,088.54
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
November 10, 2014
|
|
|
112,718,150.00
|
|
|
|
56,377,734.67
|
|
|
|
7,927,969.90
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
May 10, 2015
|
|
|
110,763,500.00
|
|
|
|
54,634,735.23
|
|
|
|
7,005,152.52
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
November 10, 2015
|
|
|
108,808,850.00
|
|
|
|
52,870,027.56
|
|
|
|
6,077,166.93
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
May 10, 2016
|
|
|
106,854,200.00
|
|
|
|
51,083,608.81
|
|
|
|
5,143,071.23
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
November 10, 2016
|
|
|
104,899,550.00
|
|
|
|
49,835,885.10
|
|
|
|
4,197,873.10
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
May 10, 2017
|
|
|
102,944,900.00
|
|
|
|
48,584,057.52
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2017
|
|
|
100,990,250.00
|
|
|
|
47,327,801.80
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2018
|
|
|
99,035,600.00
|
|
|
|
46,066,758.60
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2018
|
|
|
97,080,950.00
|
|
|
|
44,800,528.62
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2019
|
|
|
95,126,300.00
|
|
|
|
43,528,666.87
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2019
|
|
|
93,171,650.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-10
PROSPECTUS
CONTINENTAL
AIRLINES, INC.
Pass Through
Certificates
This prospectus relates to pass through certificates to be
issued by one or more trusts that we will form, as creator of
each pass through trust, with a national or state bank or trust
company, as trustee. The trustee will hold all property owned by
a trust for the benefit of holders of pass through certificates
issued by that trust. Each pass through certificate issued by a
trust will represent a beneficial interest in all property held
by that trust.
We will describe the specific terms of any offering of pass
through certificates in a prospectus supplement to this
prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the applicable
prospectus supplement carefully before you invest.
This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of pass
through certificates unless accompanied by a prospectus
supplement.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is April 24, 2009.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This prospectus, any prospectus supplement delivered with this
prospectus and the documents we incorporate by reference may
contain statements that constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include any
statements that predict, forecast, indicate or imply future
results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words
believe, anticipate, expect,
estimate, project, will be,
will continue, will result, or words or
phrases of similar meaning.
Any such forward-looking statements are not assurances of future
performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results
may vary materially from anticipated results for a number of
reasons, including those stated in our SEC reports incorporated
in this prospectus by reference or as stated in a prospectus
supplement to this prospectus under the caption Risk
Factors.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. You may read and copy this information at the
Public Reference Room of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
(800) SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an internet world wide web site that
contains reports, proxy statements and other information about
issuers, like us, who file reports electronically with the SEC.
The address of that site is
http://www.sec.gov.
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-3,
which registers the securities that we may offer under this
prospectus. The registration statement, including the exhibits
and schedules thereto, contains additional relevant information
about us and the securities offered.
INCORPORATION
OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference information into
this prospectus. This means that we can disclose important
information to you by referring you to another document filed
separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by
reference is considered to be part of this prospectus, except
for any information that is superseded by subsequent
incorporated documents or by information that is included
directly in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement.
1
This prospectus incorporates by reference the documents listed
below that we previously have filed with the SEC and that are
not delivered with this prospectus. They contain important
information about our company and its financial condition.
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Date Filed
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
January 6, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
February 3, 2009
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
February 19, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
March 3, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
April 2, 2009
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
April 24, 2009
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
April 24, 2009
|
Our SEC file number is 1-10323.
We incorporate by reference additional documents that we may
file with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act (excluding any information
furnished under Items 2.02 or 7.01 in any Current Report on
Form 8-K)
between the date of this prospectus and the termination of the
offering of securities under this prospectus. These documents
include our periodic reports, such as Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as our proxy statements.
You may obtain any of these incorporated documents from us
without charge, excluding any exhibits to those documents unless
the exhibit is specifically incorporated by reference in such
document. You may obtain documents incorporated by reference in
this prospectus by requesting them from us in writing or by
telephone at the following address:
Continental
Airlines, Inc.
1600 Smith Street, Dept. HQSEO
Houston, Texas 77002
Attention: Secretary
(713) 324-5000.
CONTINENTAL
AIRLINES, INC.
We are the worlds fifth largest airline as measured by the
number of scheduled miles flown by revenue passengers in 2008.
Including our wholly-owned subsidiary, Continental Micronesia,
Inc. (CMI), and regional flights operated on our
behalf under capacity purchase agreements with other carriers,
we operate more than 2,300 daily departures. As of
March 31, 2009, we served 121 domestic and 121
international destinations and offered additional connecting
service through alliances with domestic and foreign carriers. We
directly served ten Canadian cities, 25 European cities, seven
South American cities and six Asian cities from the
U.S. mainland as of March 31, 2009. In addition, we
provide service to more destinations in Mexico and Central
America than any other U.S. airline, serving
39 cities. Through our Guam hub, CMI provides extensive
service in the western Pacific, including service to more
Japanese cities than any other U.S. carrier.
We are a Delaware corporation, with executive offices located at
1600 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002. Our telephone number is
(713) 324-5000.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
Unless otherwise indicated in an accompanying prospectus
supplement, we intend to use the proceeds from the sale of the
securities for general corporate purposes, which may include
repayment of indebtedness and the funding of a portion of our
pension liabilities, and our working capital requirements.
2
RATIO OF
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
The following table contains our consolidated ratio of earnings
to fixed charges for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
1.42
|
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
For the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2008, and the three months
ended March 31, 2009, earnings were
insufficient to cover fixed charges by
$496 million, $109 million, $702 million, and
$135 million, respectively.
|
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is based on continuing
operations. For purposes of the ratio, earnings
means the sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
our pre-tax income (loss) adjusted for undistributed income of
companies in which we have a minority equity interest; and
|
|
|
|
our fixed charges, net of interest capitalized.
|
Fixed charges represent:
|
|
|
|
|
the interest expense we record on borrowed funds;
|
|
|
|
the amount we amortize for debt discount, premium and issuance
expense and interest previously capitalized; and
|
|
|
|
that portion of rentals considered to be representative of the
interest expense.
|
LEGAL
OPINIONS
Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus
supplement, our counsel, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP,
New York, New York, will render an opinion with respect to the
validity of the certificates being offered by such prospectus
supplement.
EXPERTS
Our consolidated financial statements appearing in our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 24, 2009 and the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting included in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in its reports thereon, which are
incorporated by reference herein. Our financial statements are
incorporated by reference in reliance upon such reports given on
the authority of Ernst & Young LLP as experts in
accounting and auditing.
3