e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
Commission File Number: 001-34084
POPULAR, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
66-0667416 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
Popular Center Building |
|
|
209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey |
|
|
San Juan, Puerto Rico |
|
00918 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(787) 765-9800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: Common Stock $0.01 par value, 1,022,682,796 shares outstanding as of
November 2, 2010.
Forward-Looking Information
The information included in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
may relate to Popular, Inc.s (the Corporation) financial condition, results of operations,
plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with
respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, market risk and the impact of interest
rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal
proceedings and new accounting standards on the Corporations financial condition and results of
operations. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are
forward-looking, and the words anticipate, believe, continues, expect, estimate,
intend, project and similar expressions and future or conditional verbs such as will,
would, should, could, might, can, may, or similar expressions are generally intended to
identify forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties,
estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict.
Various factors, some of which are beyond Populars control, could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that
might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and
economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities, including in connection
with our acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities of Westernbank
Puerto Rico from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); |
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; |
|
|
|
|
the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels
of capital; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial
Reform Act) on the Corporations businesses, business practices and costs of operations; |
|
|
|
|
the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of
the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are
located; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of the stock and bond markets; |
|
|
|
|
competition in the financial services industry; |
|
|
|
|
additional FDIC assessments; and |
|
|
|
|
possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes. |
Investors should refer to the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009 as well as Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of such factors and
certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.
Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in Part II, Item I. Legal Proceedings,
is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of
regulators, judges and juries.
All forward-looking statements included in this document are based upon information available to
the Corporation as of the date of this document, and other than as required by law, including the
requirements of applicable securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise any such
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after
the date of such statements.
3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
580,811 |
|
|
$ |
677,330 |
|
|
$ |
606,861 |
|
|
Money market investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,807 |
|
|
|
140,635 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
290,456 |
|
|
|
293,125 |
|
|
|
325,178 |
|
Time deposits with other banks |
|
|
1,733,493 |
|
|
|
549,865 |
|
|
|
633,010 |
|
|
Total money market investments |
|
|
2,023,949 |
|
|
|
1,002,797 |
|
|
|
1,098,823 |
|
|
Trading account securities, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
434,637 |
|
|
|
415,653 |
|
|
|
386,478 |
|
Other trading securities |
|
|
48,555 |
|
|
|
46,783 |
|
|
|
59,890 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
2,048,258 |
|
|
|
2,330,441 |
|
|
|
2,432,720 |
|
Other investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
3,693,225 |
|
|
|
4,364,273 |
|
|
|
4,560,571 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value as of September 30,
2010 $214,803; December 31, 2009 $213,146;
September 30, 2009
$210,913) |
|
|
214,152 |
|
|
|
212,962 |
|
|
|
212,950 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (realizable value as of
September 30, 2010 $159,622; December 31, 2009 $165,497; September 30, 2009
$176,286) |
|
|
158,309 |
|
|
|
164,149 |
|
|
|
174,943 |
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
115,088 |
|
|
|
90,796 |
|
|
|
75,447 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
22,249,167 |
|
|
|
23,827,263 |
|
|
|
24,512,966 |
|
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
4,006,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
106,685 |
|
|
|
114,150 |
|
|
|
116,897 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,243,994 |
|
|
|
1,261,204 |
|
|
|
1,207,401 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
24,904,715 |
|
|
|
22,451,909 |
|
|
|
23,188,668 |
|
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
3,308,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
531,849 |
|
|
|
584,853 |
|
|
|
589,592 |
|
Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
168,823 |
|
|
|
125,483 |
|
|
|
129,485 |
|
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
77,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
160,167 |
|
|
|
126,080 |
|
|
|
131,745 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value |
|
|
165,947 |
|
|
|
169,747 |
|
|
|
180,335 |
|
Other assets (See Note 13) |
|
|
1,459,985 |
|
|
|
1,324,917 |
|
|
|
1,156,721 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
665,333 |
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
|
|
606,508 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
60,438 |
|
|
|
43,803 |
|
|
|
46,067 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
40,820,716 |
|
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
5,371,439 |
|
|
$ |
4,495,301 |
|
|
$ |
4,281,817 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
22,368,605 |
|
|
|
21,429,593 |
|
|
|
22,101,081 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
27,740,044 |
|
|
|
25,924,894 |
|
|
|
26,382,898 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,358,139 |
|
|
|
2,632,790 |
|
|
|
2,807,891 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
191,342 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
3,077 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
5,143,388 |
|
|
|
2,648,632 |
|
|
|
2,649,821 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,278,603 |
|
|
|
983,866 |
|
|
|
1,051,661 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
36,711,516 |
|
|
|
32,197,508 |
|
|
|
32,895,348 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,006,391 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 (aggregate liquidation
preference
$50,160) |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,700,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2010
(December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 700,000,000); 1,022,878,228 shares
issued as of September 30, 2010 (December 31,2009 and
September 30, 2009 639,544,895)
and 1,022,686,418 outstanding as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009
639,540,105; September 30, 2009 639,541,515) |
|
|
10,229 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
4,094,302 |
|
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
|
|
2,794,660 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(130,808 |
) |
|
|
(292,752 |
) |
|
|
(69,525 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 191,810 shares as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009
4,790 shares; September 30, 2009 3,380) |
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax expense of $16,856 (December
31, 2009
$33,964; September 30, 2009 $57,302) |
|
|
85,862 |
|
|
|
(29,209 |
) |
|
|
(39,223 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
4,109,200 |
|
|
|
2,538,817 |
|
|
|
2,742,456 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
40,820,716 |
|
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
INTEREST INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
484,883 |
|
|
$ |
371,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,224,846 |
|
|
$ |
1,155,378 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
4,326 |
|
|
|
7,024 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
57,277 |
|
|
|
74,360 |
|
|
|
185,118 |
|
|
|
223,661 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
7,136 |
|
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
20,313 |
|
|
|
28,638 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
550,687 |
|
|
|
454,463 |
|
|
|
1,434,603 |
|
|
|
1,414,701 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
86,330 |
|
|
|
118,941 |
|
|
|
269,919 |
|
|
|
395,432 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
14,945 |
|
|
|
16,142 |
|
|
|
45,756 |
|
|
|
53,476 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
62,494 |
|
|
|
42,991 |
|
|
|
184,117 |
|
|
|
133,858 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
163,769 |
|
|
|
178,074 |
|
|
|
499,792 |
|
|
|
582,766 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
386,918 |
|
|
|
276,389 |
|
|
|
934,811 |
|
|
|
831,935 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
215,013 |
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
171,905 |
|
|
|
(54,674 |
) |
|
|
277,340 |
|
|
|
(221,101 |
) |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
48,608 |
|
|
|
54,208 |
|
|
|
149,865 |
|
|
|
161,412 |
|
Other service fees (See Note 24) |
|
|
100,822 |
|
|
|
97,614 |
|
|
|
305,867 |
|
|
|
298,584 |
|
Net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
(9,059 |
) |
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
220,792 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
31,241 |
|
Loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and
valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
|
|
(23,106 |
) |
|
|
(35,994 |
) |
FDIC loss share expense |
|
|
(36,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
10,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of processing and technology business |
|
|
640,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
24,568 |
|
|
|
18,430 |
|
|
|
63,076 |
|
|
|
44,579 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
796,524 |
|
|
|
160,044 |
|
|
|
1,170,248 |
|
|
|
720,614 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
116,426 |
|
|
|
102,822 |
|
|
|
321,423 |
|
|
|
315,224 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
24,779 |
|
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
|
78,746 |
|
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
141,205 |
|
|
|
130,547 |
|
|
|
400,169 |
|
|
|
412,044 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
28,425 |
|
|
|
28,269 |
|
|
|
86,359 |
|
|
|
80,734 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
25,432 |
|
|
|
24,983 |
|
|
|
74,231 |
|
|
|
76,289 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
13,872 |
|
|
|
13,109 |
|
|
|
38,635 |
|
|
|
39,369 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
48,224 |
|
|
|
28,694 |
|
|
|
109,498 |
|
|
|
80,643 |
|
Communications |
|
|
9,514 |
|
|
|
11,902 |
|
|
|
31,628 |
|
|
|
36,115 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
11,260 |
|
|
|
8,905 |
|
|
|
29,759 |
|
|
|
26,761 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
2,876 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
7,898 |
|
|
|
8,664 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
17,183 |
|
|
|
16,506 |
|
|
|
49,894 |
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
25,448 |
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
|
|
26,426 |
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
45,697 |
|
|
|
31,753 |
|
|
|
119,464 |
|
|
|
104,955 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
371,547 |
|
|
|
220,600 |
|
|
|
980,876 |
|
|
|
855,442 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
596,882 |
|
|
|
(115,230 |
) |
|
|
466,712 |
|
|
|
(355,929 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
102,388 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
|
113,101 |
|
|
|
(15,209 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
494,494 |
|
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
|
|
353,611 |
|
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
|
($124,988 |
) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
$ |
595,614 |
|
|
$ |
161,944 |
|
|
$ |
310,604 |
|
|
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE BASIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE DILUTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
POPULAR
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other |
|
|
|
|
including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
treasury stock |
|
Preferred stock |
|
Surplus |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
(loss) income |
|
Total |
|
Balance as of December
31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,566,277 |
|
|
$ |
1,483,525 |
|
|
$ |
621,879 |
|
|
|
($374,488 |
) |
|
|
($28,829 |
) |
|
$ |
3,268,364 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360,692 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360,692 |
) |
Accretion of discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,515 |
[3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,515) |
[3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of preferred
stock for trust preferred
securities issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(901,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(415,885 |
) |
Issuance of common stock
in exchange of preferred
stock |
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
(536,715 |
) |
|
|
291,974 |
|
|
|
230,388 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,636 |
) |
Issuance of common stock
in connection with early
extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317,652 |
|
Issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
[2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Stock options expense on
unexercised options, net
of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Change in par value |
|
|
(1,689,389) |
[4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,689,389 |
[4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,641 |
) |
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
Common stock reissuance |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
Common stock purchases |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
125,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive
loss, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,394 |
) |
|
|
(10,394 |
) |
|
Balance as of September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
$ |
6,384 |
|
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,794,660 |
|
|
|
($69,525 |
) |
|
|
($39,223 |
) |
|
$ |
2,742,456 |
|
|
Balance as of December |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31, 2009 |
|
$ |
6,380 |
|
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,804,238 |
|
|
|
($292,752 |
) |
|
|
($29,209 |
) |
|
$ |
2,538,817 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,611 |
|
Issuance of stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150,000 |
[5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150,000 |
|
Issuance of common stock
upon conversion of
preferred stock |
|
|
3,834 |
[5] |
|
|
(1,150,000) |
[5] |
|
|
1,337,833 |
[5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,667 |
|
Issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,769) |
[6] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,769 |
) |
Deemed dividend on
preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191,667 |
) |
Common stock purchases |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(530 |
) |
Other comprehensive
income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,071 |
|
|
|
115,071 |
|
|
Balance as of September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
$ |
9,684 |
|
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
4,094,302 |
|
|
|
($130,808 |
) |
|
$ |
85,862 |
|
|
$ |
4,109,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excess of carrying amount of preferred stock exchanged over fair value of new trust preferred securities and common stock issued |
|
[2] |
|
Net of issuance costs of preferred stock exchanged and issuance costs related to exchange and issuance of new common stock |
|
[3] |
|
Accretion of preferred stock discount 2008 Series C preferred stock |
|
[4] |
|
Change in par value from $6.00 to $0.01 (not in thousands) |
|
[5] |
|
Issuance and subsequent conversion of depositary shares representing interests in shares of contingent convertible non-cumulative preferred stock Series D into common stock |
|
[6] |
|
Issuance costs related to issuance and conversion of depositary shares (Preferred stock Series D) |
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Disclosure of changes in number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Preferred Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period (January 1) |
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
Issuance of stocks |
|
|
1,150,000 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,403,609 |
) [2] |
|
|
(22,403,609 |
) [2] |
Conversion of stocks |
|
|
(1,150,000 |
) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
Common Stock Issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
|
295,632,080 |
|
|
|
295,632,080 |
|
Issuance of stocks |
|
|
383,333,333 |
[1] |
|
|
357,510,076 |
[3] |
|
|
357,510,076 |
[3] |
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,597,261 |
) |
|
|
(13,597,261 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
1,022,878,228 |
|
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
(191,810 |
) |
|
|
(4,790 |
) |
|
|
(3,380 |
) |
|
Common Stock Outstanding |
|
|
1,022,686,418 |
|
|
|
639,540,105 |
|
|
|
639,541,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Issuance of 46,000,000 in depositary shares; converted into 383,333,333 common shares
(full conversion of depositary shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in shares of
contingent convertible perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock, into common stock). |
|
[2] |
|
Exchange of 21,468,609 preferred stock Series A and B for common shares, and exchange of
935,000 preferred stock Series C for trust preferred securities. |
|
[3] |
|
Shares issued in exchange of Series A and B preferred stock and early extinguishment of debt
(exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
|
($124,988 |
) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
(2,117 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
4,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
7,945 |
|
|
|
66,223 |
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
7,438 |
|
|
|
82,934 |
|
|
|
124,350 |
|
|
|
63,535 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
(3,717 |
) |
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
(3,701 |
) |
|
|
(173,868 |
) |
Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges |
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
(995 |
) |
|
|
(2,163 |
) |
|
|
(2,618 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax: |
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
|
87,432 |
|
|
|
132,179 |
|
|
|
(42,925 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
(9,955 |
) |
|
|
(17,108 |
) |
|
|
32,531 |
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
11,412 |
|
|
|
77,477 |
|
|
|
115,071 |
|
|
|
(10,394 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
$ |
505,906 |
|
|
|
($47,511 |
) |
|
$ |
468,682 |
|
|
|
($371,086 |
) |
|
Tax Effects Allocated to Each Component of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
($882 |
) |
|
|
($1,272 |
) |
|
|
($2,647 |
) |
|
|
($24,055 |
) |
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
(9,137 |
) |
|
|
(15,724 |
) |
|
|
(5,844 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
62,790 |
|
Unrealized net losses on cash flows hedges |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
($888 |
) |
|
|
($9,955 |
) |
|
|
($17,108 |
) |
|
$ |
32,531 |
|
|
Disclosure of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
($35,269 |
) |
|
|
($40,676 |
) |
|
|
($41,185 |
) |
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
(119,841 |
) |
|
|
(127,786 |
) |
|
|
(193,986 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
45,919 |
|
|
|
48,566 |
|
|
|
75,586 |
|
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans, net of tax |
|
|
(73,922 |
) |
|
|
(79,220 |
) |
|
|
(118,400 |
) |
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
224,739 |
|
|
|
104,090 |
|
|
|
139,641 |
|
Tax effect |
|
|
(29,306 |
) |
|
|
(14,134 |
) |
|
|
(18,672 |
) |
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax |
|
|
195,433 |
|
|
|
89,956 |
|
|
|
120,969 |
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on cash flows hedges |
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
(995 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
388 |
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on cash flows hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
85,862 |
|
|
|
($29,209 |
) |
|
|
($39,223 |
) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
8
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
47,084 |
|
|
|
49,033 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
Fair value adjustments of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
19,959 |
|
|
|
17,598 |
|
Net (accretion of discounts) amortization of premiums and deferred fees |
|
|
(150,577 |
) |
|
|
50,613 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
|
|
(220,792 |
) |
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
(35,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FDIC loss share expense |
|
|
13,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gains from changes in fair value related to instruments measured at fair value pursuant
to the fair value option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
Net (gain)
loss on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(1,993 |
) |
|
|
1,696 |
|
Net loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation
adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
23,106 |
|
|
|
41,202 |
|
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
26,426 |
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Gain on sale
of processing and technology business, net of transaction costs |
|
|
(616,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Earnings from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(16,144 |
) |
|
|
(14,307 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
(76,444 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(494,312 |
) |
|
|
(919,719 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(213,897 |
) |
|
|
(280,243 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
57,831 |
|
|
|
65,258 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
565,611 |
|
|
|
1,302,093 |
|
Net decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
24,935 |
|
Net decrease in other assets |
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
26,935 |
|
Net decrease in interest payable |
|
|
(34,559 |
) |
|
|
(57,763 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
Net increase in other liabilities |
|
|
95,902 |
|
|
|
65,431 |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(41,396 |
) |
|
|
1,058,616 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
312,215 |
|
|
|
697,924 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in money market investments |
|
|
(924,913 |
) |
|
|
(304,169 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(688,678 |
) |
|
|
(4,105,915 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(52,198 |
) |
|
|
(54,562 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(44,021 |
) |
|
|
(36,601 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
1,329,390 |
|
|
|
1,261,801 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
51,067 |
|
|
|
136,535 |
|
Other |
|
|
108,470 |
|
|
|
62,480 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
396,676 |
|
|
|
3,825,502 |
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,294 |
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
1,292,935 |
|
|
|
666,618 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
15,908 |
|
|
|
325,414 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
(130,488 |
) |
|
|
(37,965 |
) |
Cash received from acquisitions |
|
|
261,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of processing and technology businesses |
|
|
642,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(40,336 |
) |
|
|
(55,625 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
13,503 |
|
|
|
36,105 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
120,412 |
|
|
|
107,720 |
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
2,350,762 |
|
|
|
1,878,603 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
(574,739 |
) |
|
|
(1,167,108 |
) |
Net decrease in assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(274,651 |
) |
|
|
(743,717 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
184,016 |
|
|
|
(1,857 |
) |
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
(3,281,449 |
) |
|
|
(807,002 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
111,101 |
|
|
|
61,100 |
|
Prepayment penalties paid on cancellation of debt |
|
|
(25,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of depositary shares |
|
|
1,102,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,438 |
) |
Issuance costs and fees paid on exchange of preferred stock and trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,618 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,759,496 |
) |
|
|
(2,754,653 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and due from banks |
|
|
(96,519 |
) |
|
|
(178,126 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
677,330 |
|
|
|
784,987 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
580,811 |
|
|
$ |
606,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
|
Note: The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
includes the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with
discontinued operations.
9
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1
|
|
|
|
Nature of Operations |
Note 2
|
|
|
|
Business Combination |
Note 3
|
|
|
|
Sale of Processing and Technology Business |
Note 4
|
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Note 5
|
|
|
|
Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards |
Note 6
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
Note 7
|
|
|
|
Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities |
Note 8
|
|
|
|
Pledged Assets |
Note 9
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities Available-For-Sale |
Note 10
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity |
Note 11
|
|
|
|
Loans Held-in-Portfolio and Allowance for Loan Losses |
Note 12
|
|
|
|
Transfers of Financial Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights |
Note 13
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
Note 14
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Note 15
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
Note 16
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
Note 17
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Securities |
Note 18
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
Note 19
|
|
|
|
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees |
Note 20
|
|
|
|
Non-consolidated Variable Interest Entities |
Note 21
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement |
Note 22
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Note 23
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Common Share |
Note 24
|
|
|
|
Other Service Fees |
Note 25
|
|
|
|
Pension and Postretirement Benefits |
Note 26
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
Note 27
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes |
Note 28
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
Note 29
|
|
|
|
Segment Reporting |
Note 30
|
|
|
|
Subsequent Events |
Note 31
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered Guaranteed Securities |
10
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Nature of Operations
Popular, Inc. (the Corporation or Popular) is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding
company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States, the Caribbean and Latin
America. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail and commercial banking services through
its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), as well as auto and
equipment leasing and financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance
services through specialized subsidiaries. In the United States, the Corporation operates Banco
Popular North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community
bank providing a broad range of financial services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA
operates branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit
accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. The sections that follow provide a description of
two significant transactions that impacted the Corporations operations during 2010.
Westernbank FDIC-Assisted Transaction
On April 30, 2010, BPPR entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) to acquire certain assets and assume certain deposits and
liabilities of Westernbank Puerto Rico, a Puerto Rico state-chartered bank headquartered in
Mayaguez, Puerto Rico (Westernbank)(herein the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction).
Westernbank was a wholly-owned commercial bank subsidiary of W Holding Company, Inc. and operated
through a network of 44 branches located throughout Puerto Rico. In August 2010, Popular
successfully completed the Westernbanks systems and branch conversions. All retail and commercial
accounts were converted to Populars applications. Furthermore, out of the estimated 1,440
full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) that Westernbank had at the time of acquisition, the
Corporation has hired to date close to 816 FTEs. The Corporation retained a limited number of the
branches, some of which were consolidated with other existing branches of BPPR. Refer to Note 2 to
the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction. Refer to the Corporations Form 8-K/A filed on July 16, 2010 for additional
information with respect to this FDIC-assisted transaction.
EVERTEC
On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a 51% interest in EVERTEC, including
the Corporations merchant acquiring and processing and technology businesses (the EVERTEC
transaction), and continues to hold the remaining 49% interest in the company. Refer to Note 3 to
the consolidated financial statements for a description of the EVERTEC transaction. EVERTEC
provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, and continues
to provide processing and technology services to many of Populars subsidiaries.
Note 2 Business Combination
As indicated in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, on April 30, 2010, the
Corporations banking subsidiary, BPPR, acquired certain assets and assumed certain deposits of
Westernbank Puerto Rico from the FDIC, as receiver for Westernbank, in an assisted transaction.
BPPR acquired approximately $9.1 billion in assets and assumed approximately $2.4 billion in
deposits, excluding the effects of purchase accounting adjustments. As part of the transaction, on
April 30, 2010, BPPR issued a five-year $5.8 billion note payable to the FDIC bearing an annual
interest rate of 2.50%. The note is secured by a substantial amount of the assets, including loans
and foreclosed other real estate properties acquired by BPPR from the FDIC in the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction, and which are subject to the loss sharing agreements. In addition, as
part of the consideration for the transaction, the FDIC received a cash-settled equity appreciation
instrument, which is described in detail below.
Loss Sharing Agreements
In connection with the acquisition, BPPR entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC with
respect to approximately $8.6 billion of loans and other real estate (the covered assets)
acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing
agreements, the FDICs obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets
begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC will reimburse BPPR
11
for 80% of losses with
respect to covered assets, and BPPR will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with
respect to losses for which the FDIC paid BPPR 80% reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements.
The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC
loss and recoveries sharing for ten years. The loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial and
consumer loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for
eight years, in each case, on the same terms and conditions as described above.
In addition, BPPR has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days
following the last day (the True-Up Measurement Date) of the final shared loss month, or upon the
final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on
the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true-up
payment is recorded as a reduction in the fair value of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset.
Under the loss sharing agreements, BPPR shall pay to the FDIC, 50% of the excess, if any, of: (i)
20% of the Intrinsic Loss Estimate of $4.6 billion (or $925 million)(as determined by the FDIC)
less (ii) the sum of: (A) 25% of the asset discount (per bid) (or ($1.1 billion)); plus (B) 25% of
the cumulative shared-loss payments (defined as the aggregate of all of the payments made or
payable to BPPR minus the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the FDIC); plus (C)
the sum of the period servicing amounts for every consecutive twelve-month period prior to and
ending on the True-Up Measurement Date in respect of each of the loss sharing agreements during
which the loss sharing provisions of the applicable loss sharing agreement is in effect (defined as
the product of the simple average of the principal amount of shared loss loans and shared loss
assets at the beginning and end of such period times 1%).
Covered loans under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC (the covered loans) are reported in
loans exclusive of the estimated FDIC loss share indemnification asset. The covered loans acquired
in the Westernbank transaction are, and will continue to be, reviewed for collectability. Under ASC
Subtopic 310-30, if there is a decrease in the expected cash flows on loans due to an increase in
estimated credit losses compared to the estimate made at the April 30, 2010 acquisition date, the
Corporation will record a charge to the provision for loan losses and an allowance for loan losses
will be established. If there is an increase in inherent losses on the loans accounted for under
ASC Subtopic 310-20, an allowance for loan losses will be established to record the loans at their
net realizable value. A related credit to income and an increase in the FDIC loss share
indemnification asset will be recognized at the same time, measured based on the loss share
percentages described above, for ASC Subtopic 310-20 and 310-30 loans.
The operating results of the Corporation for the quarter and nine months ended September 30,
2010 include the operating results produced by the acquired assets and liabilities assumed for
the period of May 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010. The Corporation believes that given the nature
of assets and liabilities assumed, the significant amount of fair value adjustments, the nature
of additional consideration provided to the FDIC (note payable and equity appreciation
instrument) and the FDIC loss sharing agreements now in place, historical results of Westernbank
are not meaningful to Populars results, and thus no pro forma information is presented.
12
The following table presents balances recorded by the Corporation at the time of the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction on April 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value prior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As recorded by |
|
|
accounting |
|
Fair value |
|
Additional |
|
Popular, Inc. on |
(In thousands) |
|
adjustments |
|
adjustments |
|
consideration |
|
April 30, 2010 |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and money market investments |
|
$ |
358,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
358,132 |
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
58,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,610 |
|
Covered loans |
|
|
8,503,839 |
|
|
|
($4,286,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,216,992 |
|
Non-covered loans |
|
|
50,905 |
|
|
|
(6,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,996 |
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,322,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,322,561 |
|
Covered other real estate owned |
|
|
125,947 |
|
|
|
(52,712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,235 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,415 |
|
Receivable from FDIC (associated to the note
issued to the FDIC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
111,101 |
|
|
|
111,101 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
44,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,926 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,142,359 |
|
|
|
($999,492 |
) |
|
$ |
111,101 |
|
|
$ |
8,253,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
2,380,170 |
|
|
$ |
11,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,391,635 |
|
Note issued to the FDIC (including a premium
of $11,612 resulting from the fair value
adjustment) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,769,696 |
|
|
|
5,769,696 |
|
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,442 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
2,394,095 |
|
|
$ |
143,907 |
|
|
$ |
5,822,196 |
|
|
$ |
8,360,198 |
|
|
Excess of assets acquired over liabilities assumed |
|
$ |
6,748,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate fair value adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1,143,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate additional consideration, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,711,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill on acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
106,230 |
|
|
As previously disclosed, the fair values initially assigned to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed were preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing
date of the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values becomes available.
Because of the size of the transaction and delays in the receipt of certain information, the
Corporation continues to analyze its estimates of fair value on loans acquired, FDIC loss share
indemnification asset recorded and the note issued to the FDIC. As the Corporation finalizes its
analyses of these assets and liabilities, there may be adjustments to the recorded carrying values,
and thus the recognized goodwill may increase or decrease.
The following is a description of the methods used to determine the fair values of significant
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction:
Loans
Fair values for loans were based on a discounted cash flow methodology. Certain loans were valued
individually, while other loans were valued as pools. Aggregation into pools considered
characteristics such as loan type, payment term, rate type and accruing status. Principal and
interest projections considered prepayment rates and credit loss expectations. The discount rates
were developed based on the relative risk of the cash flows, taking into account principally the
loan type, market rates as of the valuation date, liquidity expectations, and the expected life of
the loans.
FDIC loss share indemnification asset
Fair value was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on
the expected reimbursements for losses, including consideration of the true up payment and the
applicable loss sharing percentages. These expected reimbursements do not include reimbursable
amounts related to future covered expenditures. The estimates of expected losses used in valuation
of this asset are consistent with the loss estimates used in the valuation of the covered assets.
These cash flows were discounted to reflect the estimated timing of the receipt of the loss share
reimbursement from the FDIC and the value of any true-up payment due to the FDIC at the end of the
loss sharing agreements, to the extent applicable. The discount rate used in this calculation was
13
determined using a yield of an A-rated corporate security with a term based on the weighted average life of the recovery of cash
flows plus a risk premium reflecting the uncertainty related to the timing of cash flows and the
potential rejection of claims by the FDIC. Due to the increased uncertainty of the true-up payment,
an additional risk premium was added to the discount rate.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation has not made any claims to the FDIC associated with
losses incurred on covered loans or covered other real estate owned.
Receivable from the FDIC
The note issued to the FDIC as of the April 30, 2010 transaction date was determined based on a
pro-forma statement of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of February 24, 2010, the bid
transaction date. The receivable from the FDIC represents an adjustment to reconcile the
consideration paid based on the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of April 30, 2010
compared with the pro-forma statement as of February 24, 2010. The carrying amount of this
receivable was a reasonable estimate of fair value based on its short-term nature. The receivable
from the FDIC was collected by BPPR in June 2010 and is reflected as a cash inflow from financing
activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. The proceeds were remitted to the FDIC in July 2010 as a payment on the note.
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC (OREO)
OREO includes real estate acquired in settlement of loans. OREO properties were recorded at
estimated fair values less costs to sell at the date acquired based on managements assessments of
existing appraisals or broker price opinions. The estimated costs to sell are based on past
experience with similar property types and terms customary for real estate transactions.
Goodwill
The amount of goodwill is the residual difference in the fair value of liabilities assumed and net
consideration paid to the FDIC over the fair value of the assets acquired. The goodwill is
deductible for income tax purposes. The goodwill from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction was
assigned to the BPPR reportable segment.
Core deposit intangible
This intangible asset represents the value of the relationships that Westernbank had with its
deposit customers. The fair value of this intangible asset was estimated based on a discounted cash
flow methodology that gave appropriate consideration to expected customer attrition rates, cost of
the core deposit base, interest costs, and the net maintenance cost attributable to customer
deposits, and the cost of alternative funds.
Deposits
The fair values used for the demand and savings deposits that comprise the transaction accounts
acquired, by definition equal the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair values
for time deposits were estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest
rates currently offered to comparable time deposits with similar maturities.
Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments
Unfunded loan commitments are contractual obligations to provide future funding. The fair value of
a liability associated to unfunded loan commitments is principally based on the expected
utilization rate or likelihood that the commitment will be exercised. The estimated value of the
unfunded commitments was equal to the expected loss associated with the balance expected to be
funded. The expected loss is comprised of both credit and non-credit components; therefore, the
discounts derived from the loan valuation were applied to the expected balance to be funded to
derive the fair value. The unfunded loan commitments outstanding as of the April 30, 2010
transaction date, which approximated $227 million, relate principally to commercial and
construction loans and commercial revolving lines of credit. Losses incurred on loan disbursements
made under these unfunded loan commitments are covered by the FDIC loss sharing agreements provided
that the Corporation complies with specific requirements under such agreements. The contingent
liability on unfunded loan commitments is included as part of other liabilities in the
consolidated statement of condition.
14
Deferred taxes
Deferred taxes relate to a difference between the financial statement and tax basis of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction. Deferred taxes are reported based upon the
principles in ASC Topic 740 Income Taxes, and are measured using the enacted statutory income tax
rate to be in effect for BPPR at the time the deferred tax is expected to reverse, which is 39%.
For income tax purposes, the Westernbank transaction was accounted for as an asset purchase and the
tax bases of assets acquired were allocated based on fair values using a modified residual method.
Under this method, the purchase price was allocated among the assets in order of liquidity (the
most liquid first) up to its fair market value.
Note issued to the FDIC
The fair value of the note issued to the FDIC was determined using discounted cash flows based on
market rates currently available for debt with similar terms, including consideration that the debt
is collateralized by the assets covered under the loss sharing agreements. The principal source of
cash flows to pay down the note derives from the cash flows collected from the covered assets, as
well as payments from the FDIC on claimed credit losses associated to the covered assets. The
Corporation is required under the agreements with the FDIC to use those proceeds to repay the note
and remit payments on a monthly basis.
Equity appreciation instrument
As part of the consideration for the acquisition of Westernbank assets, BPPR also issued an equity
appreciation instrument to the FDIC. Under the terms of the equity appreciation instrument, the
FDIC has the opportunity to obtain a cash payment with a value equal to the product of (a) 50
million units and (b) the difference between (i) Popular, Inc.s average volume weighted price
over the two NASDAQ trading days immediately prior to the exercise date and (ii) the exercise price
of $3.43. The equity appreciation instrument is exercisable by the holder thereof, in whole or in
part, up to May 7, 2011. The fair value of the equity appreciation instrument was estimated by
determining a call option value using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The equity
appreciation instrument is recorded as a liability and any subsequent changes in its estimated fair
value will be recognized in earnings. The Corporation recognized non-interest income of $10.6
million and $35.0 million during the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010,
respectively, as a result of a decrease in the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument.
These amounts are separately disclosed in the consolidated statement of operations within the
non-interest income category.
Note 3 Sale of Processing and Technology Business
On June 30, 2010, Popular and its subsidiaries BPPR, Popular International Bank, Inc. (PIBI) and
EVERTEC completed an internal reorganization transferring certain intellectual property assets and
interests in certain of the Corporations foreign subsidiaries to EVERTEC. Commencing on June 30,
2010, PIBIs wholly-owned subsidiaries ATH Costa Rica S.A. and T.I.I. Smart Solutions Inc. became
wholly-owned subsidiaries of EVERTEC. Also, in connection with the reorganization, BPPRs Merchant
Business and TicketPop divisions were transferred to EVERTEC. On September 30, 2010, EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA,
C.A. became a subsidiary of PIBI and EVERTEC LATINOAMERICA, SOCIEDAD
ANONIMA was transferred from PIBI to EVERTEC.
On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a majority interest in its processing
and technology business EVERTEC, including the businesses transferred in the internal
reorganization discussed above. The Corporation retained EVERTECs
operations in Venezuela and certain related contracts. Under the terms of the sale, an unrelated third party acquired a
51% interest in EVERTEC for cash under a leverage buyout. The Corporation retained the remaining
49% interest. The Corporations investment in EVERTEC, which is
accounted for under the equity method,
amounted to $177 million as of September 30, 2010, and is included as part of other assets in the
consolidated statement of condition. The Corporations proportionate share of income or loss from
EVERTEC will be included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations
commencing on October 1, 2010.
As a result of the sale, the Corporation recognized a pre-tax gain, net of transaction costs, of
approximately $616.2 million ($531.0 million after-tax), of which $640.8 million was separately
disclosed within non-interest income in the consolidated statement of operations and $24.6 million
are included as operating expenses (transaction costs) for the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Approximately $94.0 million of the pre-tax gain was the result of marking the
Corporations retained interest in the EVERTEC business at fair
value. This portion of the gain was non-cash.
The equity value of the Corporations retained interest in the former subsidiary takes into consideration the
buyers enterprise value of EVERTEC reduced by the leverage financing, net of debt issue costs, utilized as part of
the sale transaction. This leverage financing significantly impacts the resulting fair value of the retained interest.
15
In connection with the leverage transaction, EVERTEC issued financing in the form of unsecured
senior notes and a syndicated loan (senior secured credit facility). The Corporation invested $35
million in senior unsecured notes issued by EVERTEC ($17.85 million, net of the intercompany
elimination related to the 49% ownership interest maintained by Popular), which bear interest at an
annual fixed rate of 11% and mature in October 2018. Also, the Corporation provided financing to
EVERTEC by acquiring $58.2 million of the syndicated loan ($29.7 million, net of intercompany
eliminations).
Also, as part of the sale, Popular entered into various agreements including a master services
agreement pursuant to which EVERTEC will continue providing various processing and information
technology services to Popular, BPPR, and their respective subsidiaries. These service costs will
be included prospectively in operating expenses on the Corporations consolidated statements of
operations, net of elimination entries that are required due to Popular holding a 49% ownership
interest in EVERTEC. Also, as part of the agreement, BPPR commits to support the ATH debit cards as
well as the ATH network, owned and operated by EVERTEC.
The equity investments in the processing businesses of Servicios Financieros, S.A. de C.V.
(Serfinsa) and Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) continued to be held by the
Corporation as of September 30, 2010. Under the terms of the merger agreement, the Corporation is
required for a period of twelve months following the merger to continue to seek to sell its equity
interests in such entities to EVERTEC, subject to complying with certain rights of first refusal in
favor of the Serfinsa and CONTADO shareholders. The
Corporations investments in Serfinsa and Contado, accounted
for under the equity method, amounted to $1.3 million and $15.9
million, respectively, as of September 30, 2010.
Note 4 Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Popular, Inc. and its majority-owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. The
statement of condition data as of December 31, 2009 was derived from audited financial statements.
The unaudited interim financial statements are, in the opinion of management, a fair statement of
the results for the periods reported and include all necessary adjustments, all of a normal
recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted from the unaudited financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 2009, included in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March
1, 2010 (the 2009 Annual Report). Additionally, where applicable, the policies conform to the
accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities. Operating results
for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for a full year or any future period.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the consolidated statement of condition.
Management exercised significant judgment regarding assumptions about discount rates, future
expected cash flows including prepayments, default rates, market conditions and other future events
that are highly subjective in nature, and subject to change, and all of which affected the
estimation of the fair values of the net assets acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction. Actual results could differ from those estimates; others provided with the same
information could draw different reasonable conclusions and calculate different fair values.
Changes that may vary significantly from our assumptions include loan prepayments, credit losses,
the estimated market values of collateral at disposition, the timing of such disposition, and
deposit attrition.
Reclassifications
Servicing rights related to commercial loans (Small Business Administration), which are accounted for under the
amortization method, have been reclassified to other assets in all periods presented, while mortgage servicing rights, which are accounted for at fair value, are presented separately in the consolidated statements of condition.
Amounts reported in prior periods consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported cash flows, shareholders equity or net income.
16
Business Acquisition
The Corporation determined that the acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain
liabilities of Westernbank in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction constitutes a business
acquisition as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Codification (ASC)
Topic 805 Business Combinations. The assets and liabilities, both tangible and intangible, were
initially recorded at their estimated fair values. Fair values were determined based on the
requirements of FASB Codification Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements. These fair value estimates
are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the
acquisition as additional information regarding the closing date fair value becomes available.
Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
Loans acquired in an FDIC-assisted transaction
Loans acquired in a business acquisition are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date.
Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance for loan
losses is not recorded at the acquisition date.
Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 represent loans showing evidence of credit
deterioration and that it is probable, at the date of acquisition, that the Corporation will not
collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. Generally, acquired loans that
meet the definition for nonaccrual status fall within the Corporations definition of impaired
loans under ASC Subtopic 310-30. Also, based on the fair value determined for the acquired
portfolio, acquired loans that did not meet the definition of nonaccrual status also resulted in
the recognition of a significant discount attributable to credit quality. Accordingly, an election
was made by the Corporation to apply the accretable yield method (expected cash flow model of ASC
Subtopic 310-30), as a loan with credit deterioration and impairment, instead of the standard loan
discount accretion guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20. These loans are disclosed as a loan that was
acquired with credit deterioration and impairment.
The
Corporation applied the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to all loans acquired in the transaction
(including loans that do not meet scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30), except for credit cards and revolving lines
of credit that were expressly scoped out from the application of this guidance since they continued
to have revolving privileges after acquisition. Management used its judgment in evaluating factors
impacting expected cash flows and probable loss assumptions, including the quality of the loan
portfolio, portfolio concentrations, distressed economic conditions in Puerto Rico, quality of
underwriting standards of the acquired institution, reductions in collateral real estate values,
among other considerations that could also impact the expected cash inflows on the loans.
Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the covered loans acquired from the FDIC were aggregated into pools
based on loans that had common risk characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single
asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows.
Characteristics considered in pooling loans in the FDIC-assisted transaction included loan type,
interest rate type, accruing status, and amortization type. Once the pools are defined, the
Corporation maintains the integrity of the pool of multiple loans accounted for as a single asset.
Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at
acquisition and the fair value in the loans, or the accretable yield, is recognized as interest
income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of the loan if the timing and
amount of the future cash flows of the pool is reasonably estimable. The non-accretable difference
represents the difference between contractually required principal and interest and the cash flows
expected to be collected. Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those
expected at the acquisition date are recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in
expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan
losses.
The fair value discount of lines of credit with revolving privileges that are accounted for
pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20 represents the difference between the contractually
required loan payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loan. This discount is
accreted into interest income over the life of the loan if the loan is in accruing status. Any cash
flows collected in excess of the carrying amount of the loan are recognized in earnings at the time
of collection. The carrying amount of lines of credit with revolving privileges, which are
accounted pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, are subject to periodic review to
determine the need for recognizing an allowance for loan losses.
Covered Assets
17
Assets subject to loss sharing agreements with the FDIC are labeled covered on the consolidated
statement of condition and include certain loans and other real estate properties. Loans acquired
in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for credit cards, are considered covered
loans because the Corporation will be reimbursed for 80% of any future losses on these loans
subject to the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreements.
FDIC Loss Share Indemnification Asset
The acquisition date fair value of the reimbursement that the Corporation expects to receive from
the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements was recorded as an FDIC loss share indemnification asset
on the consolidated statement of condition. Fair value was estimated using projected cash flows
related to the loss sharing agreements. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on the valuation
methodology.
The FDIC loss share indemnification asset for loss share agreements is measured separately from the
related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the assets and is not transferable
with the assets should the assets be sold.
The impact of the FDIC loss share indemnification on the Corporations results of operations is
included in non-interest income, particularly in the category of FDIC loss share expense, and considers the accretion due to discounting and the changes in expected loss sharing
reimbursements.
The indemnification asset is recognized on the same basis as the assets subject to loss share
protection. As such, for covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, decreases in
expected reimbursements will be recognized in income prospectively consistent with the approach
taken to recognize increases in cash flows on covered loans. For covered loans accounted for under
ASC Subtopic 310-20, as the loan discount recorded as of the acquisition date is accreted into
income, a reduction of the corresponding indemnification asset is recorded as a reduction in
non-interest income.
Increases in expected reimbursements will be recognized in income in the same period that the
allowance for credit losses for the related loans is recognized.
Equity Appreciation Instrument
The equity appreciation instrument is recorded as an other liability in the consolidated
statement of condition and any subsequent change in its estimated fair value is recognized in
earnings on each quarterly reporting date. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements
for additional information on the equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC.
Note 5 Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting
Standards
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 860) Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (ASU 2009-16)
ASU 2009-16 amends previous guidance relating to transfers of financial assets and eliminates the
concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, removes the exception for guaranteed mortgage
securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial
assets, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and includes additional
disclosures requiring more information about transfers of financial assets in which entities have
continuing exposure to the risks related to the transferred financial assets. Among the most
significant amendments and additions to this guidance are changes to the conditions for sales of
financial assets which objective is to determine whether a transferor and its consolidated
affiliates included in the financial statements have surrendered control over transferred financial
assets or third-party beneficial interests, and the addition of the meaning of the term
participating interest which represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire
financial asset. The requirements for sale accounting must be applied only to a financial asset in
its entirety, a pool of financial assets in its entirety, or participating interests as defined in
ASC paragraph 860-10-40-6A. This guidance has been applied as of the beginning of the first annual
reporting period that began after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual
reporting period and will be applied for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier
application was prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions have been applied to
transfers that have occurred on or after the effective date. On and after the effective date,
18
existing qualifying special-purpose entities have been evaluated for consolidation in accordance with the applicable
consolidation guidance in the Codification. The Corporation adopted this new authoritative
accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010. The Corporation evaluated transfers of financial
assets executed during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 pursuant to the new accounting
guidance, principally consisting of guaranteed mortgage securitizations (Government National
Mortgage Association (GNMA) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) mortgage-backed
securities), and determined that the adoption of ASU 2009-16 did not have a significant impact on
the Corporations accounting for such transactions or results of operations or financial condition
for such period.
A securitization of a financial asset, a participating interest in a financial asset, or a pool of
financial assets in which the Corporation (and its consolidated affiliates) (a) surrenders control
over the transferred assets and (b) receives cash or other proceeds is accounted for as a sale.
Control is considered to be surrendered only if all three of the following conditions are met: (1)
the assets have been legally isolated; (2) the transferee has the ability to pledge or exchange the
assets; and (3) the transferor no longer maintains effective control over the assets. When the
Corporation transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of the above criteria, the
Corporation is prevented from derecognizing the transferred financial assets and the transaction is
accounted for as a secured borrowing.
The Corporation recognizes and initially measures at fair value a servicing asset or servicing
liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a
servicing contract in either of the following situations: (1) a transfer of an entire financial
asset, a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset
that meets the requirements for sale accounting; or (2) an acquisition or assumption of a servicing
obligation of financial assets that do not pertain to the Corporation or its consolidated
subsidiaries. Upon adoption of ASU 2009-16, the Corporation does not recognize either a servicing
asset or a servicing liability if it transfers or securitizes financial assets in a transaction
that does not meet the requirements for sale accounting and is accounted for as a secured
borrowing.
Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for disclosures on transfers of financial
assets and servicing assets retained as part of guaranteed mortgage securitizations.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-17, Consolidations (ASC Topic 810) Improvements to
Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (ASU 2009-17) and
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810): Amendments for Certain
Investment Funds (ASU 2010-10)
ASU 2009-17 amends the guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIEs) and changes how a
reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled
through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. This guidance replaces a
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which entity, if any, has both (a)
a controlling financial interest in a VIE with an approach focused on identifying which entity has
the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits
from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This guidance requires
reconsideration of whether an entity is a VIE when any changes in facts or circumstances occur such
that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power to direct the
activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. It also
requires ongoing assessments of whether a variable interest holder is the primary beneficiary of a
VIE. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affect all entities that were within the scope of
the original guidance, as well as qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs) that were
previously excluded from the guidance. ASU 2009-17 requires a reporting entity to provide
additional disclosures about its involvement with VIEs and any significant changes in risk exposure
due to that involvement. The Corporation adopted this new authoritative accounting guidance
effective January 1, 2010. The new accounting guidance on VIEs did not have an effect on the
Corporations consolidated statement of condition or results of operations upon adoption.
The principal VIEs evaluated by the Corporation during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
included: (1) GNMA and FNMA guaranteed mortgage securitizations and for which management has
concluded that the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary (refer to Note 20 to the consolidated
financial statements) and (2) the trust preferred securities for which management believes that the
Corporation does not possess a significant variable interest on the trusts (refer to Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements).
19
Additionally, the Corporation has variable interests in certain investments that have the
attributes of investment companies, as well as limited partnership investments in venture capital
companies. However, in January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810),
Amendments for Certain Investment Funds, which deferred the effective date of the provisions of ASU
2009-17 for a reporting entitys interest in an entity that has all the attributes of an investment
company; or for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial
reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. The deferral
allows asset managers that have no obligation to fund potentially significant losses of an
investment entity to continue to apply the previous accounting guidance to investment entities that
have the attributes of entities subject to ASC Topic 946 (the Investment Company Guide). The FASB
also decided to defer the application of ASU 2009-17 for money market funds subject to Rule 2a-7 of
the Investment Company Act of 1940. Asset managers would continue to apply the applicable existing
guidance to those entities that qualify for the deferral. ASU 2010-10 did not defer the disclosure
requirements in ASU 2009-17.
The Corporation was not required to consolidate existing VIEs for which it has a variable interest
as of September 30, 2010. Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for required
disclosures associated with the guaranteed mortgage securitizations in which the Corporation holds
a variable interest.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) -
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06)
ASU 2010-06, issued in January 2010, revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value
measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers
into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such
transfers. It will also require the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements
within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also clarify that
disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about
inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value
measurements. ASU 2010-06 has been effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective
for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. This guidance impacts
disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition or results of operations. The Corporations disclosures about fair value measurements are
presented in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC Topic 815): Scope Exception
Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives (ASU 2010-11)
ASU 2010-11 clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded
derivative bifurcation requirements. The type of credit derivative that qualifies for the exemption
is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities
that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such
subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The
amendments in ASU 2010-11 are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first
fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard in the third quarter of
2010 did not have a significant impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-18, Receivables (ASC Topic 310): Effect of a Loan
Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset (ASU
2010-18)
The amendments in ASU 2010-18, issued in April 2010, affect any entity that acquires loans subject
to ASC Subtopic 310-30, that accounts for some or all of those loans within pools, and that
subsequently modifies one or more of those loans after acquisition. ASC Subtopic 310-30 provides
guidance on accounting for acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon
acquisition. As a result of the amendments in ASU 2010-18, modifications of loans that are
accounted for within a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans
from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt
restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in
which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments
in ASU 2010-18 do not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30 that
are not accounted for within pools. Loans
20
accounted for individually under ASC
Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions
within ASC Subtopic 310-40, ReceivablesTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments
in ASU 2010-18 are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under ASC
Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010.
The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Early application is permitted. Upon initial
adoption of the guidance in ASU 2010-18, an entity may make a one-time election to terminate
accounting for loans as a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30. This election may be applied on a
pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent
acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration. The Corporation elected to early adopt the
provisions of this statement, effective with the closing of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction on April 30, 2010. As a result, the accounting for modified loans follows the
guidelines of ASU 2010-18; however, the adoption of these provisions did not have a significant
impact on the Corporations result of operations or financial position as of September 30, 2010.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-20, Receivables (ASC Topic 310): Disclosure about the Credit
Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20)
ASU 2010-20, issued in July 2010, expands disclosure requirements about the credit quality of
financing receivables and allowance for credit losses. The objective of this ASU is for an entity
to provide disclosures that facilitate financial statement users evaluation of the
following: (1) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entitys portfolio of financing
receivables; (2) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit
losses; and (3) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses.
Disclosures should be provided on a disaggregated basis on two defined levels: (1) portfolio
segment; and (2) class of financing receivable. The ASU 2010-20 makes changes to existing
disclosure requirements and includes additional disclosure requirements about financing
receivables, including: the credit quality indicators of financing receivables at the end of the
reporting period by class of financing receivables; the aging of past due financing receivables at
the end of the reporting period by class of financing receivables; and the nature and extent of
troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the period by class of financing receivables and
their effect on the allowance for credit losses. The disclosure requirements as of the end of a
reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December
15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. This guidance impacts
disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition or results of operations.
Note 6 Discontinued Operations
In 2008, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular Financial Holdings (PFH) by
selling assets and closing service branches and other units. The loss from discontinued operations
for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $3.4 million and $20.0 million,
respectively, net of taxes. This loss was primarily related to salary and other expenses incurred
in providing loan portfolio servicing to affiliated companies and other costs for FTEs that were
retained for a transition period, as well as adjustments to indemnity reserves on loans previously
sold.
Note 7 Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities
The Corporations subsidiary banks are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to
maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank or other banks. Those required
average reserve balances were $828 million as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $721
million; September 30, 2009 $705 million). Cash and due from banks as well as other short-term,
highly-liquid securities are used to cover the required average reserve balances.
As required by the Puerto Rico International Banking Center Regulatory Act, as of September 30,
2010, December 31, 2009, and September 30, 2009, the Corporation maintained separately for its two
international banking entities (IBEs), $0.6 million in time deposits, equally divided for the two
IBEs, which were considered restricted assets.
As part of a line of credit facility with a financial institution, as of December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $2 million as collateral for the
line of credit. This restriction expired on July 2010.
21
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $6 million to support
letters of credit (December 31, 2009 $4 million; September 30, 2009 $5 million).
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $2 million that represents
funds deposited in an escrow account which are guaranteeing possible liens or encumbrances over the
title of insured properties.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $12 million to comply with
the requirements of the credit card networks.
Note 8 Pledged Assets
Certain securities, loans and other real estate owned were pledged principally to secure public
and trust deposits, assets sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit
facilities available, derivative positions, loan servicing agreements and the loss sharing
agreement with the FDIC.
The classification and carrying amount of the Corporations pledged assets, in which the secured
parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
2,102,699 |
|
|
$ |
1,923,338 |
|
|
$ |
2,183,586 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
125,770 |
|
|
|
125,769 |
|
|
|
25,769 |
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
2,254 |
|
|
|
2,636 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
3,966,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
9,646,035 |
|
|
|
8,993,967 |
|
|
|
8,406,876 |
|
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
77,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pledged assets |
|
$ |
15,920,885 |
|
|
$ |
11,045,328 |
|
|
$ |
10,618,867 |
|
|
Pledged investment securities and loans in which the creditor has the right by custom or
contract to repledge are presented separately in the consolidated statements of condition.
As of September 30, 2010, investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity totaling
$1.7 billion, and loans of $0.2 billion, served as collateral to secure public funds.
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of New York (FHLB) and from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Fed). As of September 30,
2010, the banking subsidiaries had short-term and long-term credit facilities authorized with the
FHLB aggregating $1.7 billion. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for
borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities. As of September 30, 2010, the credit
facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $3.7 billion in loans held-in-portfolio.
Also, the Corporations banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Fed discount window of
$2.7 billion, which remained unused as of such date. The amount available under this credit
facility is dependent upon the balance of loans and securities pledged as collateral. As of
September 30, 2010, the credit facilities with the Fed discount window were collateralized by $5.7
billion in loans held-in-portfolio. These pledged assets are included in the above table and were
not reclassified and separately reported in the consolidated statement of condition as of September
30, 2010.
Loans held-in-portfolio and other real estate owned that are covered by loss sharing agreements
with the FDIC amounting to $4.0 billion as of September 30, 2010, serve as collateral to secure the
note issued to the FDIC. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for descriptive
information on the note issued to the FDIC.
22
Note 9 Investment Securities Available-For-Sale
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and weighted average yield of
investment securities available-for-sale as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September
30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
$ |
6,998 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,164 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
28,850 |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,259 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
Total U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
35,848 |
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,423 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
288,588 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,568 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,011,751 |
|
|
|
65,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076,754 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,890 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,069 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,328,747 |
|
|
|
68,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,396,960 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
10,140 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,158 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
15,858 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
16,227 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
21,225 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
21,224 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,715 |
|
|
|
5.29 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
52,783 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
53,324 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,125 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
87,668 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,311 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,215,779 |
|
|
|
38,744 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1,254,485 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,306,585 |
|
|
|
40,494 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1,347,041 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
13,612 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
13,254 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
85,796 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
82,136 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
99,408 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
4,306 |
|
|
|
95,390 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
3,494 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,569 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
18,557 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,276 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
182,930 |
|
|
|
12,349 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
195,277 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,461,567 |
|
|
|
103,118 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
2,564,529 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
2,666,548 |
|
|
|
116,261 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
2,782,651 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8,975 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
8,844 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,850 |
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
5,516,744 |
|
|
$ |
229,828 |
|
|
$ |
5,089 |
|
|
$ |
5,741,483 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
29,359 |
|
|
$ |
1,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,452 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
349,424 |
|
|
|
7,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,915 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,177,318 |
|
|
|
58,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,235,469 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,812 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,492 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,884 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,060 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,581,438 |
|
|
|
66,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,647,936 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
22,311 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
22,303 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
50,910 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
50,527 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
7,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
81,061 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
80,609 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,995 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
125,397 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
127,098 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,454,833 |
|
|
|
19,060 |
|
|
|
5,837 |
|
|
|
1,468,056 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,585,146 |
|
|
|
21,285 |
|
|
|
6,241 |
|
|
|
1,600,190 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
20,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
20,232 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
105,669 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
8,452 |
|
|
|
97,326 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
126,554 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
|
|
117,558 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
26,878 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,390 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
30,117 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,940 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
205,480 |
|
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,261 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,915,689 |
|
|
|
32,102 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
2,937,588 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
3,178,164 |
|
|
|
42,218 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
3,210,179 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8,902 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
7,790 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
6,590,624 |
|
|
$ |
131,692 |
|
|
$ |
27,602 |
|
|
$ |
6,694,714 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
29,528 |
|
|
$ |
1,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,136 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
184,261 |
|
|
|
4,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,437 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,377,705 |
|
|
|
71,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,449,395 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,812 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,764 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,882 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,682 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,616,660 |
|
|
|
77,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694,278 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
12,375 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
|
12,277 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
50,969 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
48,997 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
27,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
27,704 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
91,254 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
88,983 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
138,044 |
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
140,214 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,438,743 |
|
|
|
26,787 |
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
1,453,907 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,580,519 |
|
|
|
29,475 |
|
|
|
12,031 |
|
|
|
1,597,963 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
23,481 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
22,915 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
115,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,988 |
|
|
|
103,775 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
139,350 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12,568 |
|
|
|
126,796 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
9,072 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9,169 |
|
|
|
3.07 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
62,462 |
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,893 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
178,392 |
|
|
|
9,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,675 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
3,136,807 |
|
|
|
47,982 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
3,184,558 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
3,386,733 |
|
|
|
58,814 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
3,445,295 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
9,606 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
8,840 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
6,853,650 |
|
|
$ |
168,002 |
|
|
$ |
28,361 |
|
|
$ |
6,993,291 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
25
The following table shows the Corporations fair value and gross unrealized losses of
investment securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2010,
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
18,234 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
18,536 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
13,880 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
6,402 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
20,282 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
68,032 |
|
|
|
4,212 |
|
|
|
69,583 |
|
|
|
4,306 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
8,915 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
10,155 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
3,849 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
42,583 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
79,822 |
|
|
$ |
4,758 |
|
|
$ |
122,405 |
|
|
$ |
5,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
2,387 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
63,429 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
65,816 |
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
298,917 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
359,214 |
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
|
|
658,131 |
|
|
|
6,241 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
6,716 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
97,904 |
|
|
|
9,087 |
|
|
|
104,620 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
905,028 |
|
|
|
10,130 |
|
|
|
3,566 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
908,594 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
1,215,395 |
|
|
$ |
14,804 |
|
|
$ |
528,011 |
|
|
$ |
12,798 |
|
|
$ |
1,743,406 |
|
|
$ |
27,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
26,299 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
58,123 |
|
|
$ |
2,407 |
|
|
$ |
84,422 |
|
|
$ |
2,573 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
137,288 |
|
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
486,652 |
|
|
|
8,129 |
|
|
|
623,940 |
|
|
|
12,031 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
114,635 |
|
|
|
12,237 |
|
|
|
118,570 |
|
|
|
12,568 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
51,648 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
11,949 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
63,597 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
6,588 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
221,919 |
|
|
$ |
5,049 |
|
|
$ |
675,198 |
|
|
$ |
23,312 |
|
|
$ |
897,117 |
|
|
$ |
28,361 |
|
|
26
Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair
value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the
value of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for
anticipated credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired, the excess of the securitys carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is
accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires management to
consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition
of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment structure of the debt
security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a
rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a
geographic area, and (7) managements intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely
than not that the Corporation would be required to sell the debt security before a forecasted
recovery occurs.
As of September 30, 2010, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an
unrealized loss position. Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no individual
debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. As of September 30, 2010, the
Corporation does not have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it
is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell the investment securities prior
to recovery of their amortized cost basis. Also, management evaluated the Corporations portfolio
of equity securities as of September 30, 2010. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the
Corporation did not record any other-than-temporary impairment losses on equity securities.
Management has the intent and ability to hold the investments in equity securities that are at a
loss position as of September 30, 2010 for a reasonable period of time for a forecasted recovery of
fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of these investments.
The unrealized losses associated with Collateralized mortgage obligations private label are
primarily related to securities backed by residential mortgages. In addition to verifying the
credit ratings for the private-label CMOs, management analyzed the underlying mortgage loan
collateral for these bonds. Various statistics or metrics were reviewed for each private-label CMO,
including among others, the weighted average loan-to-value, FICO score, and delinquency and
foreclosure rates of the underlying assets in the securities. As of September 30, 2010, there were
no sub-prime securities in the Corporations private-label CMOs portfolios. For private-label
CMOs with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2010, credit impairment was assessed using a cash
flow model that estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific
collateral and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage
loans and distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the
transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure.
The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows through the current period and then projects the
expected cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, loss severity and
prepayment rates. Managements assessment also considered tests using more stressful parameters.
Based on the assessments, management concluded that the tranches of the private-label CMOs held by
the Corporation were not other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2010, thus management
expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the securities.
Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale during the quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 amounted to $377.2 million and $396.7 million; respectively. Gains
of $3.7 million were realized during the quarter and year-to-date periods ended September 30, 2010
related to the sale during this quarter of investment securities available-for-sale. This compares
with proceeds of $77.9 million and $3.8 billion respectively, and realized net gains of $198
thousand and $184.3 million respectively, for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
27
The following table states the names of issuers and the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of
the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities), in
which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders equity. This
information excludes securities of the U.S. Government agencies and corporations. Investments in
obligations issued by a State of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies, which are
payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other than the U.S.
Government, are considered securities of a single issuer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
FNMA |
|
$ |
792,291 |
|
|
$ |
826,042 |
|
|
$ |
970,744 |
|
|
$ |
991,825 |
|
|
$ |
1,067,001 |
|
|
$ |
1,089,443 |
|
FHLB |
|
|
1,173,877 |
|
|
|
1,238,487 |
|
|
|
1,385,535 |
|
|
|
1,449,454 |
|
|
|
1,395,778 |
|
|
|
1,469,493 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
602,440 |
|
|
|
620,384 |
|
|
|
959,316 |
|
|
|
971,556 |
|
|
|
997,716 |
|
|
|
1,012,276 |
|
|
28
Note 10 Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and weighted average yield
of investment securities held-to-maturity as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,812 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,814 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
110,528 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,148 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,595 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
|
18,049 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
49,300 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
48,879 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
184,573 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
185,240 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
Total others |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
214,152 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
$ |
722 |
|
|
$ |
214,803 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,777 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,781 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,015 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,021 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
109,415 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
112,566 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,112 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
16,699 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
48,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,552 |
|
|
|
46,048 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
182,142 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
182,334 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
Total others |
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
212,962 |
|
|
$ |
3,206 |
|
|
$ |
3,022 |
|
|
$ |
213,146 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
25,763 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,015 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,022 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
109,415 |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
111,717 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,107 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
16,281 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
48,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,502 |
|
|
|
45,098 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
182,137 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
4,427 |
|
|
|
180,118 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
Total others |
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
212,950 |
|
|
$ |
2,408 |
|
|
$ |
4,445 |
|
|
$ |
210,913 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
The following table shows the Corporations fair value and gross unrealized losses of
investment securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2010,
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,126 |
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
$ |
31,126 |
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Others |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
31,307 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
31,550 |
|
|
$ |
722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
21,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
$ |
37,718 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
58,905 |
|
|
$ |
3,010 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
21,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
$ |
37,926 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
59,113 |
|
|
$ |
3,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
25,763 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,763 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
42,995 |
|
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
$ |
19,493 |
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
|
62,488 |
|
|
|
4,427 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized
loss position |
|
$ |
68,758 |
|
|
$ |
3,996 |
|
|
$ |
19,953 |
|
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
$ |
88,711 |
|
|
$ |
4,445 |
|
|
30
As indicated in Note 9 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates
investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis.
The Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions classified as held-to-maturity
as of September 30, 2010 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of
Puerto Rico and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. The Corporation performs
periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers. The decline in fair value as of September 30,
2010 was attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality; thus no
other-than-temporary decline in value was recorded in these held-to-maturity securities. As of
September 30, 2010, the Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities held-to-maturity
and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell these investment
securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.
Note 11 Loans Held-in-Portfolio and Allowance for Loan Losses
Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction acquired loans are significantly different from those loans not covered under the FDIC
loss sharing agreements. Accordingly, the Corporation presents loans subject to the loss sharing
agreements as covered loans in the information below and loans that are not subject to the FDIC
loss sharing agreements as non-covered loans.
The composition of loans held-in-portfolio (HIP) as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and
September 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-covered |
|
Covered |
|
Total loans HIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans as of |
|
loans as of |
|
as of September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
11,719,127 |
|
|
$ |
2,382,102 |
|
|
$ |
14,101,229 |
|
|
$ |
12,664,059 |
|
|
$ |
13,075,868 |
|
Construction |
|
|
1,299,929 |
|
|
|
287,159 |
|
|
|
1,587,088 |
|
|
|
1,724,373 |
|
|
|
1,882,069 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
613,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613,560 |
|
|
|
675,629 |
|
|
|
699,350 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
4,750,068 |
|
|
|
1,166,837 |
|
|
|
5,916,905 |
|
|
|
4,603,245 |
|
|
|
4,547,372 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
3,759,798 |
|
|
|
170,129 |
|
|
|
3,929,927 |
|
|
|
4,045,807 |
|
|
|
4,191,410 |
|
|
Total loans HIP |
|
$ |
22,142,482 |
|
|
$ |
4,006,227 |
|
|
$ |
26,148,709 |
|
|
$ |
23,713,113 |
|
|
$ |
24,396,069 |
|
|
The following table presents acquired loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 as
of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Contractually-required principal and interest |
|
$ |
10,995,387 |
|
Non-accretable difference |
|
|
5,789,480 |
|
|
Cash flows expected to be collected |
|
|
5,205,907 |
|
Accretable yield |
|
|
1,303,908 |
|
|
Fair value of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 |
|
$ |
3,901,999 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Reflects a difference of $11.4 million compared with the amounts disclosed in
the Form 8-K/A filed on July 16, 2010, which included the financial statements and
exhibits pertaining to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction at the acquisition
date. The Corporation reassessed the classification of certain acquired loans and, due
to their revolving characteristics, reclassified the loans for accounting purposes from
ASC Subtopic 310-30 to ASC Subtopic 310-20. The reclassification did not impact the fair
value of the loans. |
The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the
underlying loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments. The unpaid principal balance of
the acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are accounted under ASC
Subtopic 310-30 amounted to $7.8 billion as of the April 30, 2010 transaction date.
31
Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the acquired loans in the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction as of and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, and which
are accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Accretable yield |
|
|
of loans |
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions [1] |
|
$ |
1,303,908 |
|
|
$ |
3,901,999 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
(95,506 |
) |
|
|
95,506 |
|
Payments received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338,308 |
) |
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,208,402 |
|
|
$ |
3,659,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents the estimated fair value of the loans at the date of
acquisition. There were no reclassifications from non-accretable
difference to accretable yield from April 30, 2010 to September 30, 2010. |
As of September 30, 2010, none of the acquired loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were
considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference
between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all
acquired loans.
As indicated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation accounts for lines
of credit with revolving privileges under the accounting guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which
requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess
of the initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income over the life of the loan,
if the loan is accruing interest. The following table presents acquired loans accounted for under
ASC Subtopic 310-20 as of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-20 |
|
$ |
358,989 |
[1] |
|
Gross contractual amounts receivable (principal and interest) |
|
$ |
1,007,880 |
|
|
Estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected |
|
$ |
614,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Reflects a difference of $11.4 million compared with the amounts disclosed in the Form
8-K/A filed on July 16, 2010, which included the financial statements and exhibits
pertaining to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction at the acquisition date. The
Corporation reassessed the classification of certain acquired loans and, due to their
revolving characteristics, reclassified the loans for accounting purposes from ASC Subtopic
310-30 to ASC Subtopic 310-20. The reclassification did not impact the fair value of the
loans. |
The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the
underlying loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments. The unpaid principal balance of
the acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are accounted pursuant to
ASC Subtopic 310-20 amounted to $739 million as of the April 30, 2010 transaction date.
There was no need to record an allowance for loan losses related to the covered loans as of
September 30, 2010.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Balance as of January 1 |
|
$ |
1,261,204 |
|
|
$ |
882,807 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Loan charge-offs |
|
|
(750,609 |
) |
|
|
(776,119 |
) |
Loan recoveries |
|
|
75,928 |
|
|
|
47,677 |
|
|
Balance as of September 30 |
|
$ |
1,243,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,207,401 |
|
|
Note 12 Transfers of Financial Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Corporation typically transfers conforming residential mortgage loans in conjunction with GNMA
and FNMA securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities and
servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the
corresponding agency and, as such, under seller/servicer agreements the Corporation is required to
service the loans in accordance with the agencies servicing guidelines and standards.
Substantially all mortgage loans securitized by the Corporation in GNMA and FNMA securities have
fixed rates and represent conforming loans. As seller, the Corporation has made certain
representations and
32
warranties with respect to the originally transferred loans and, in some instances, has sold
loans with credit recourse to a government-sponsored entity, namely FNMA. Refer to Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements for a description of such arrangements.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation retained servicing rights on
guaranteed mortgage securitizations (FNMA and GNMA) and whole loan sales involving approximately
$697 million in principal balance outstanding (September 30, 2009 $1.2 billion). During the
quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Corporation recognized net gains of approximately
$3.8 million and $12.6 million, respectively, on these transactions (September 30, 2009 $6.4
million for the quarter and $32.8 million for the nine-month period). All loan sales or
securitizations performed during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were without credit
recourse arrangements.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation obtained as proceeds $227 million of
assets as a result of securitization transactions with FNMA and GNMA, consisting of $223 million in
mortgage-backed securities and $4 million in servicing rights. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, the Corporation obtained as proceeds $645 million of assets as a result of
securitization transactions with FNMA and GNMA, consisting of $634 million in mortgage-backed
securities and $11 million in servicing rights. No liabilities were incurred as a result of these
transfers during the quarter and nine month-period ended September 30, 2010 because they did not
contain any credit recourse arrangements. The Corporation recorded a
net gain of $3.0 million and $13.2
million, respectively, during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 related to these
residential mortgage loans securitized.
The following tables present the initial fair value of the assets obtained as proceeds from
residential mortgage loans securitized during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds Obtained During the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Initial Fair Value |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
168,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
168,622 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,136 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
222,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
222,758 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,932 |
|
|
$ |
3,932 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
222,758 |
|
|
$ |
3,932 |
|
|
$ |
226,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds Obtained During the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Initial Fair Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
496,223 |
|
|
$ |
4,147 |
|
|
$ |
500,370 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,641 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
626,864 |
|
|
$ |
4,147 |
|
|
$ |
631,011 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,467 |
|
|
$ |
11,467 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
629,674 |
|
|
$ |
15,614 |
|
|
$ |
645,288 |
|
|
Refer to Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for key inputs, assumptions, and
valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of these mortgage-backed securities and
mortgage servicing rights.
33
Mortgage servicing rights
The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these rights
are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations.
Classes of mortgage servicing rights were determined based on the different markets or types of
assets being serviced. The Corporation recognizes the servicing rights of its banking subsidiaries
that are related to residential mortgage loans as a class of servicing rights. These mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) are measured at fair value. Fair value determination is performed on a
subsidiary basis, with assumptions varying in accordance with the types of assets or markets
served.
The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The
discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in
estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate,
cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment and late
fees, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporations loan
characteristics and portfolio behavior.
The following table presents the changes in residential MSRs measured using the fair value method
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Fair value as of January 1 |
|
$ |
169,747 |
|
|
$ |
176,034 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
11,909 |
|
|
|
19,640 |
|
Changes due to payments on loans [1] |
|
|
(11,990 |
) |
|
|
(10,750 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model
inputs or assumptions |
|
|
(7,969 |
) |
|
|
(5,618 |
) |
|
Fair value as of September 30 |
|
$ |
165,947 |
|
|
$ |
180,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time. |
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $18.0 billion as of September 30, 2010
(December 31, 2009 $17.7 billion; September 30, 2009 $17.7 billion).
Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of other service fees in the consolidated statements of
operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, which may
result from changes in the valuation model inputs or assumptions (principally reflecting changes in
discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions) and other changes, including changes due to
collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value
adjustments, for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 amounted to $11.7 million and
$35.4 million, respectively (September 30, 2009 $11.7 million and $34.7 million, respectively).
The banking subsidiaries receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding loan
balance. As of September 30, 2010, those weighted average mortgage servicing fees were 0.27%
(September 30, 2009 0.26%). Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not
generally earn significant prepayment penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced.
The discussion that follows includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the
MSRs, originated and purchased.
Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights retained at the date of the
residential mortgage loan securitizations and whole loan sales by the banking subsidiaries during
the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and year ended December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Prepayment speed |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
Weighted average life |
|
20.1 years |
|
12.8 years |
Discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
34
Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and
securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to
immediate changes in those assumptions as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated MSRs |
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
98,966 |
|
|
$ |
97,870 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
11.2 years |
|
8.8 years |
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($3,386 |
) |
|
|
($3,182 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($6,684 |
) |
|
|
($7,173 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
12.80 |
% |
|
|
12.41 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($4,062 |
) |
|
|
($2,715 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($7,911 |
) |
|
|
($6,240 |
) |
The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial
institutions. The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the
sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions as of period end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased MSRs |
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
66,981 |
|
|
$ |
71,877 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
12.1 years |
|
9.9 years |
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($2,636 |
) |
|
|
($2,697 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($4,655 |
) |
|
|
($5,406 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($2,923 |
) |
|
|
($2,331 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($5,180 |
) |
|
|
($4,681 |
) |
The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are
hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value
based on a 10 and 20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because
the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.
Also, in the sensitivity tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other
assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example,
increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses),
which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.1 billion (December 31, 2009 and September
30, 2009 $4.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the Corporation.
Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation has the right to repurchase, at its option and
without GNMAs prior authorization, any loan that is collateral for a GNMA guaranteed
mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the time that individual
loans meet GNMAs specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the Corporation
is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans. As of September 30, 2010, the
Corporation had recorded $163 million in mortgage loans on its financial statements related to this
buy-back option program (December 31, 2009 $124 million; September 30, 2009 $112 million).
35
Note 13 Other Assets
The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of condition consists of the following
major categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Net deferred tax assets (net of
valuation allowance) |
|
$ |
336,661 |
|
|
$ |
363,967 |
|
|
$ |
380,596 |
|
Investments under the equity method |
|
|
292,493 |
|
|
|
99,772 |
|
|
|
97,817 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
236,824 |
|
|
|
232,387 |
|
|
|
230,579 |
|
Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment |
|
|
164,190 |
|
|
|
206,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other prepaid expenses |
|
|
91,193 |
|
|
|
130,762 |
|
|
|
144,949 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
85,180 |
|
|
|
71,822 |
|
|
|
81,249 |
|
Trade receivables from brokers and
counterparties |
|
|
37,996 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
8,275 |
|
Others |
|
|
215,448 |
|
|
|
218,795 |
|
|
|
213,256 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
1,459,985 |
|
|
$ |
1,324,917 |
|
|
$ |
1,156,721 |
|
|
Note 14 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, allocated by reportable segments and corporate group, were as follows (refer to Note 29 for
the definition of the Corporations reportable segments):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Goodwill |
|
Purchase accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
on acquisition |
|
adjustments |
|
Other |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
$ |
106,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
263,255 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($45,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
$ |
106,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($45,246 |
) |
|
$ |
665,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Goodwill |
|
Purchase accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
on acquisition |
|
adjustments |
|
Other |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
157,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
44,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
605,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
606,508 |
|
|
The goodwill recognized in the BPPR reportable segment during 2010 relates to the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further
information on the accounting for the transaction and the resulting goodwill recognition. The fair
values initially assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction are subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of
the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values becomes available. Any
changes in such fair value estimates may impact the goodwill initially recorded.
On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of the processing and technology
business, which resulted in a $45 million reduction of goodwill for the Corporation. See Note 3 to
the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the sale. The goodwill from
EVERTEC was included in the Corporate group since EVERTEC is no longer considered a reportable
segment as discussed in Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements.
36
The gross amount of goodwill and accumulated impairment losses at the beginning and the end of the
quarter by reportable segment and Corporate group were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance at January |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January |
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
1, 2010 (Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
1, 2010 (Net |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Accumulated |
|
September 30, 2010 |
(In thousands) |
|
amounts) |
|
Impairment Losses |
|
amounts) |
|
(Gross amounts) |
|
Impairment Losses |
|
(Net amounts) |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
$ |
263,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
263,255 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
566,489 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
566,489 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
45,429 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
768,943 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
$ |
829,744 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
$ |
665,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Balance at January |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January |
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
1, 2009 (Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
1, 2009 (Net |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Accumulated |
|
September 30, 2009 |
(In thousands) |
|
amounts) |
|
Impairment Losses |
|
amounts) |
|
(Gross amounts) |
|
Impairment Losses |
|
(Net amounts) |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
157,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,059 |
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
568,648 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
568,648 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
44,679 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
44,496 |
|
|
|
45,429 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
770,386 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
605,792 |
|
|
$ |
771,102 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
606,508 |
|
|
The accumulated impairment losses in the BPNA reportable segment are associated with E-LOAN.
As of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $6 million
of identifiable intangible assets, other than goodwill, with indefinite useful lives.
The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Core deposits |
|
$ |
80,591 |
|
|
$ |
27,721 |
|
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
30,991 |
|
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
29,276 |
|
Other
customer relationships |
|
|
4,719 |
|
|
|
3,291 |
|
|
|
8,816 |
|
|
|
5,804 |
|
|
|
8,816 |
|
|
|
5,478 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
85,435 |
|
|
$ |
31,111 |
|
|
$ |
74,320 |
|
|
$ |
36,866 |
|
|
$ |
76,982 |
|
|
$ |
37,263 |
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $24 million in a
core deposit intangible asset associated with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. This core
deposit intangible asset is to be amortized to operating expenses ratably on a monthly basis over a
10-year period.
Certain core deposits and other customer relationships intangibles with a gross amount of $9
million and $0.8 million respectively, became fully amortized during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, and, as such, their gross amount and accumulated amortization were eliminated
from the tabular disclosure presented above. The decrease in other customer relationships category
was associated to the sale of the ownership interest in EVERTEC described in Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements.
During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $2.4
million and $6.9 million, respectively, in amortization related to other intangible assets with
definite useful lives (September 30, 2009 $2.4 million and $7.2 million, respectively).
37
The following table presents the estimated amortization of the intangible assets with definite
useful lives for each of the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2010
|
|
$ |
2,242 |
|
Year 2011
|
|
|
8,936 |
|
Year 2012
|
|
|
8,409 |
|
Year 2013
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
Year 2014
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
Year 2015
|
|
|
5,478 |
|
|
Results of the Goodwill Impairment Test
The Corporations goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets having an indefinite
useful life are tested for impairment. Intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated for
impairment at least annually and on a more frequent basis if events or circumstances indicate
impairment could have taken place. Such events could include, among others, a significant adverse
change in the business climate, an adverse action by a regulator, an unanticipated change in the
competitive environment and a decision to change the operations or dispose of a reporting unit.
Under applicable accounting standards, goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first
step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with
its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its
carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step must be performed.
The second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for
which the first step indicated possible impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is
determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, which
is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the
aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles (including
any unrecognized intangible assets, such as unrecognized core deposits and trademark) as if the
reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting
unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The Corporation estimates the fair values of
the assets and liabilities of a reporting unit, consistent with the requirements of the fair value
measurements accounting standard, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. The fair value of the assets and liabilities reflects market conditions,
thus volatility in prices could have a material impact on the determination of the implied fair
value of the reporting unit goodwill at the impairment test date. The adjustments to measure the
assets, liabilities and intangibles at fair value are for the purpose of measuring the implied fair
value of goodwill and such adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated statement of
condition. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the goodwill assigned to the reporting
unit, there is no impairment. If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair
value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss
recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss
establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not
permitted under applicable accounting standards.
The Corporation performed the annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the entire organization
during the third quarter of 2010 using July 31, 2010 as the annual evaluation date. The reporting
units utilized for this evaluation were those that are one level below the business segments, which
are the legal entities within the reportable segment. The Corporation follows push-down accounting,
as such all goodwill is assigned to the reporting units when carrying out a business combination.
In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the Corporation generally uses a combination of
methods, including market price multiples of comparable companies and transactions, as well as
discounted cash flow analysis. Management evaluates the particular circumstances of each reporting
unit in order to determine the most appropriate valuation methodology. The Corporation evaluates
the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value
drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the
circumstances. Elements considered include current market and economic conditions, developments in
specific lines of business, and any particular features in the individual reporting units.
The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that
are used as part
38
of these evaluations include:
|
|
|
a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business,
location and size; |
|
|
|
|
a selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions; |
|
|
|
|
the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of
equity; |
|
|
|
|
the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and |
|
|
|
|
the market growth and new business assumptions. |
For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuations were determined by calculating average
price multiples of relevant value drivers from a group of companies that are comparable to the
reporting unit being analyzed and applying those price multiples to the value drivers of the
reporting unit. Multiples used are minority based multiples and thus, no control premium adjustment
is made to the comparable companies market multiples. While the market price multiple is not an
assumption, a presumption that it provides an indicator of the value of the reporting unit is
inherent in the valuation. The determination of the market comparables also involves a degree of
judgment.
For purposes of the discounted cash flows (DCF) approach, the valuation is based on estimated
future cash flows. The financial projections used in the DCF valuation analysis for each reporting
unit are based on the most recent (as of the valuation date) financial projections presented to the
Corporations Asset / Liability Management Committee (ALCO). The growth assumptions included in
these projections are based on managements expectations for each reporting units financial
prospects considering economic and industry conditions as well as particular plans of each entity
(i.e. restructuring plans, de-leveraging, etc.). The cost of equity used to discount the cash flows
was calculated using the Ibbotson Build-Up Method and ranged from 8.42% to 23.24% for the 2010
analysis. The Ibbottson Build-Up Method builds up a cost of equity starting with the rate of return
of a risk-free asset (10-year U.S. Treasury note) and adds to it additional risk elements such as
equity risk premium, size premium, and industry risk premium. The resulting discount rates were
analyzed in terms of reasonability given the current market conditions and adjustments were made
when necessary.
For BPNA, the only reporting unit that failed Step 1, the Corporation determined the fair value of
Step 1 utilizing a market value approach based on a combination of price multiples from comparable
companies and multiples from capital raising transactions of comparable companies. The market
multiples used included price to book and price to tangible book. Additionally, the Corporation
determined the reporting unit fair value using a DCF analysis based on BPNAs financial
projections, but assigned no weight to it given that the current market approaches provide a more
meaningful measure of fair value considering the reporting units financial performance and current
market conditions. The Step 1 fair value for BPNA under both valuation approaches (market and DCF)
was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the valuation date (July 31),
requiring the completion of Step 2. In accordance with accounting standards, the Corporation
performed a valuation of all assets and liabilities of BPNA, including any recognized and
unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of BPNAs net assets. To complete Step
2, the Corporation subtracted from BPNAs Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net
assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 indicated that
the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of $402 million at July 31,
2010, resulting in no goodwill impairment. The reduction in BPNAs Step 1 fair value was offset by
a reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting in an implied fair value of goodwill
that exceeds the recorded book value of goodwill.
The analysis of the results for Step 2 indicates that the reduction in the fair value of the
reporting unit was mainly attributed to the deteriorated fair value of the loan portfolios and not
to the fair value of the reporting unit as a going concern entity. The current negative performance
of the reporting unit is principally related to deteriorated credit quality in its loan portfolio,
which agrees with the results of the Step 2 analysis. The fair value determined for BPNAs loan
portfolio in the July 31, 2010 annual test represented a discount of 23.6%, compared with 20.2% at
December 31, 2009. The discount is mainly attributed to market participants expected rate of
returns, which affected the market discount on the commercial and construction loan portfolios and
deteriorated credit quality of the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios of BPNA. Refer to Note 29
to the consolidated financial statements, which provides highlights of BPNAs reportable segment
financial performance for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010. BPNAs
provision for loan losses, as a stand-alone legal entity, which is the reporting unit
level used for the goodwill impairment analysis, amounted to $226 million for nine months ended
September 30, 2010, which represented 144% of BPNA legal entitys net loss of $157 million for that
period.
39
If the Step 1 fair value of BPNA declines further in the future without a corresponding decrease in
the fair value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve without a corresponding increase in
the Step 1 fair value, the Corporation may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge. The
Corporation engaged a third-party valuator to assist management in the annual evaluation of BPNAs
goodwill (including Step 1 and Step 2) as well as BPNAs loan portfolios as of the July 31, 2010
valuation date. Management discussed the methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the
relevant values for conclusions and determined they were reasonable.
Furthermore, as part of the analyses, management performed a reconciliation of the aggregate fair
values determined for the reporting units to the market capitalization of Popular, Inc. concluding
that the fair value results determined for the reporting units in the July 31, 2010 annual
assessment were reasonable.
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and
assumptions with regard to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ
significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill
that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporations results of operations and the reporting
units where the goodwill is recorded. Declines in the Corporations market capitalization increase
the risk of goodwill impairment in the future.
Management monitors events or changes in circumstances between annual tests to determine if these
events or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting
unit below its carrying amount. As indicated in this MD&A, the economic situation in the United
States and Puerto Rico, including deterioration in the housing market and credit market, continued
to negatively impact the financial results of the Corporation during 2010.
Note 15 Deposits
Total interest bearing deposits as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
$ |
6,126,358 |
|
|
$ |
5,480,124 |
|
NOW, money market and other
interest bearing demand
deposits |
|
|
4,854,392 |
|
|
|
4,726,204 |
|
|
Total savings, NOW, money
market and other
interest bearing demand deposits |
|
|
10,980,750 |
|
|
|
10,206,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under $100,000 |
|
|
6,609,544 |
[1] |
|
|
6,553,022 |
[1] |
$100,000 and over |
|
|
4,778,311 |
|
|
|
4,670,243 |
|
|
Total certificates of deposits |
|
|
11,387,855 |
|
|
|
11,223,265 |
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
22,368,605 |
|
|
$ |
21,429,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes brokered certificates of deposit amounting to $2.5 billion as of September 30,
2010 and $2.7 billion as of December 31, 2009. |
A summary of certificates of deposit by maturity as of September 30, 2010 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2010 |
|
$ |
3,332,971 |
|
2011 |
|
|
4,775,554 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,360,520 |
|
2013 |
|
|
655,948 |
|
2014 |
|
|
398,443 |
|
2015 and thereafter |
|
|
864,419 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,387,855 |
|
|
40
Note 16 Borrowings
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
2,358,139 |
|
|
$ |
2,632,790 |
|
|
$ |
2,807,891 |
|
|
The repurchase agreements outstanding as of September 30, 2010 were collateralized by $2.1
billion in investment securities available-for-sale, $435
million in trading securities and
$39 million in other assets. It is the Corporations policy to maintain effective control over
assets sold under agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on
the consolidated statements of condition.
In addition, there were repurchase agreements outstanding collateralized by $170 million in
securities purchased underlying agreements to resell to which the Corporation has the right to
repledge. It is the Corporations policy to take possession of securities purchased under
agreements to resell. However, the counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control
over such securities, and accordingly are not reflected in the Corporations consolidated
statements of condition.
Other short-term borrowings consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Secured borrowing with clearing broker with an interest rate of 1.50% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advances with the FHLB maturing in October 2010 paying interest at maturity
at fixed rates ranging from 0.41% to 0.43% |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured borrowings with private investors paying interest at a fixed rate of 0.45% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
Term funds purchased maturing in 2010 paying interest at maturity
at fixed rates ranging from 0.65% to 1.15% |
|
|
65,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
Total other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
191,342 |
|
|
$ |
7,326 |
|
|
$ |
3,077 |
|
|
41
Notes payable consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Advances with the FHLB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-with maturities ranging from 2011 through 2015 paying interest at monthly fixed
rates ranging from 3.31% to 5.02% (September 30, 2009 1.48% to 5.06%) |
|
$ |
568,423 |
|
|
$ |
1,103,627 |
|
|
$ |
1,105,429 |
|
-maturing in 2010 paying interest quarterly at a fixed rate of 5.10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note issued to the FDIC, including unamortized premium of $2,242; paying
interest monthly at an annual fixed rate of 2.50%; maturing on April 30, 2015
or such earlier date as such amount may become due and payable pursuant to
the terms of the note |
|
|
3,288,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes paying interest monthly at fixed rates ranging from 3.00% to 6.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2011 to 2013 paying interest semiannually
at fixed rates ranging from 5.25% to 13.00% (September 30, 2009 5.20% to 9.75%) |
|
|
381,064 |
|
|
|
382,858 |
|
|
|
383,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2010 to 2013 paying interest
monthly at a floating rate of 3.00% over the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes paying interest quarterly at a floating rate of 6.00% to 7.50%
over the 3-month LIBOR rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred
securities) with maturities ranging from 2027 to 2034 with fixed interest
rates ranging from 6.125% to 8.327% (Refer to Note 17) |
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred
securities) ($936,000 less discount of $496,678 as of September 30, 2010) with no
stated maturity and a fixed interest rate of 5.00% until, but excluding December 5,
2013 and 9.00% thereafter (Refer to Note 17) |
|
|
439,322 |
|
|
|
423,650 |
|
|
|
418,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
25,448 |
|
|
|
27,169 |
|
|
|
27,259 |
|
|
Total notes payable |
|
$ |
5,143,388 |
|
|
$ |
2,648,632 |
|
|
$ |
2,649,821 |
|
|
Note: Refer to the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for rates and maturity information corresponding to the
borrowings outstanding as of such date. Key index rates as of September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, were as follows:
3-month LIBOR rate = 0.29% and 0.29%; 10-year U.S. Treasury note = 2.51% and 3.31%.
In consideration for the excess assets acquired over liabilities assumed as part of the
Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR issued to the FDIC a secured note (the note issued to
the FDIC) in the amount of $5.8 billion as of April 30, 2010 bearing an annual interest rate of
2.50%, which has full recourse to BPPR. As indicated in Notes 2 and 8 to the consolidated financial
statements, the note issued to the FDIC is collateralized by the loans (other than certain consumer
loans) and other real estate acquired in the agreement with the FDIC and all proceeds derived from
such assets, including cash inflows from claims to the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements.
Proceeds received from such sources are used to pay the note under the conditions stipulated in the
agreement. The entire outstanding principal balance of the note issued to the FDIC is due five
years from issuance (April 30, 2015), or such date as such amount may become due and payable
pursuant to the terms of the note. Borrowings under the note bear interest at a fixed annual rate
of 2.50% and is paid monthly. If the Corporation fails to pay any interest as and when due, such
interest shall accrue interest at the note interest rate plus 2.00% per annum. The Corporation may
repay the note in whole or in part without any penalty subject to certain notification requirements
indicated in the agreement. During the third quarter of 2010, the Corporation prepaid $2.1 billion
of the note issued to the FDIC from funds unrelated to the assets securing the note.
42
A breakdown of borrowings by contractual maturities as of September 30, 2010 is included in the
table below. Given its nature, the maturity of the note issued to the FDIC was based on expected
repayment dates and not on its April 30, 2015 contractual maturity date. The expected repayments
consider the timing of expected cash inflows on the loans, OREO and claims on the loss sharing
agreements that will be applied to repay the note during the period that the note payable to the
FDIC is outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and repurchase |
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
agreements |
|
borrowings |
|
Notes payable |
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,195,949 |
|
|
$ |
191,342 |
|
|
$ |
633,071 |
|
|
$ |
2,020,362 |
|
2011 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,835,637 |
|
|
|
2,885,637 |
|
2012 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631,835 |
|
|
|
706,835 |
|
2013 |
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,322 |
|
|
|
175,322 |
|
2014 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,824 |
|
|
|
360,824 |
|
Later years |
|
|
638,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466,377 |
|
|
|
1,104,567 |
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
2,358,139 |
|
|
$ |
191,342 |
|
|
$ |
5,640,066 |
|
|
$ |
8,189,547 |
|
Less: Discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496,678 |
) |
|
|
(496,678 |
) |
|
Total borrowings |
|
$ |
2,358,139 |
|
|
$ |
191,342 |
|
|
$ |
5,143,388 |
|
|
$ |
7,692,869 |
|
|
Note 17 Trust Preferred Securities
As of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, the Corporation had established
four trusts (BanPonce Trust I, Popular Capital Trust I, Popular North America Capital Trust I and
Popular Capital Trust II) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities (also referred to
as capital securities) to the public. The proceeds from such issuances, together with the
proceeds of the related issuances of common securities of the trusts (the common securities),
were used by the trusts to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the junior
subordinated debentures) issued by the Corporation. In August 2009, the Corporation established
the Popular Capital Trust III for the purpose of exchanging the shares of Series C preferred stock
held by the U.S. Treasury at the time for trust preferred securities issued by this trust. In
connection with this exchange, the trust used the Series C preferred stock, together with the
proceeds of issuance and sale of common securities of the trust, to purchase junior subordinated
debentures issued by the Corporation.
The sole assets of the five trusts consisted of the junior subordinated debentures of the
Corporation and the related accrued interest receivable. These trusts are not consolidated by the
Corporation.
The junior subordinated debentures are included by the Corporation as notes payable in the
consolidated statements of condition, while the common securities issued by the issuer trusts are
included as other investment securities. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned, or
indirectly wholly-owned, by the Corporation.
43
Financial data pertaining to the trusts as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009 were as follows:
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BanPonce |
|
Popular Capital |
|
America Capital |
|
Popular Capital |
|
Popular Capital |
Issuer |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust II |
|
Trust III |
|
Capital securities |
|
$ |
52,865 |
|
|
$ |
181,063 |
|
|
$ |
91,651 |
|
|
$ |
101,023 |
|
|
$ |
935,000 |
|
Distribution rate |
|
|
8.327 |
% |
|
|
6.700 |
% |
|
|
6.564 |
% |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
5.000% until, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but excluding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 5, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and 9.000% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter |
Common securities |
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
5,601 |
|
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Junior subordinated
debentures
aggregate
liquidation amount |
|
$ |
54,502 |
|
|
$ |
186,664 |
|
|
$ |
94,486 |
|
|
$ |
104,148 |
|
|
$ |
936,000 |
|
Stated maturity date |
|
February 2027 |
|
November 2033 |
|
September 2034 |
|
December 2034 |
|
Perpetual |
Reference notes |
|
|
(a),(c),(f), |
(g) |
|
|
(b),(d), |
(e) |
|
|
(a),(c), |
(f) |
|
|
(b),(d), |
(f) |
|
|
(b),(d),(h), |
(i) |
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by Popular North America (PNA) and
indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
[b] |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
[c] |
|
The obligations of PNA under the junior subordinated debentures and its guarantees of the
capital securities under the trust are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated
basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
[d] |
|
These capital securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by
the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
[e] |
|
The original issuance was for $150 million. The Corporation had reacquired $6 million of
the 8.327% capital securities at December 31, 2008. |
|
[f] |
|
The Corporation has the right, subject to any required prior approval from the Federal
Reserve, to redeem after certain dates or upon the occurrence of certain events mentioned below,
the junior subordinated debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount,
plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The maturity of the junior
subordinated debentures may be shortened at the option of the Corporation prior to their stated
maturity dates (i) on or after the stated optional redemption dates stipulated in the agreements,
in whole at any time or in part from time to time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time
within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of a tax event, an investment
company event or a capital treatment event as set forth in the indentures relating to the capital
securities, in each case subject to regulatory approval. |
|
[g] |
|
Same as [f] above, except that the investment company event does not apply for early
redemption. |
|
[h] |
|
The debentures are perpetual and may be redeemed by Popular at any time, subject to the
consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. |
|
[i] |
|
Carrying value of junior subordinates debentures of $439 million as of September 30, 2010
($936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $497 million discount); $424 million as
of December 31, 2009 ($936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $512 million
discount), and $419 million as of September 30, 2009 ($936 million aggregate liquidation
amount, net of $517 million discount). |
In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance, the trust preferred securities
represent restricted core capital elements and qualify as Tier 1 Capital, subject to quantitative
limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1
Capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25% of the sum of all core capital elements
(including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). As of September
30, 2010, the Corporations restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25% limitation.
Thus, all trust preferred securities were allowed as Tier 1 capital. As of December 31, 2009, there
were $7 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities which were disallowed as Tier 1
capital. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be
included in Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. The Federal Reserve Board revised the
quantitative limit which would limit restricted core capital elements included in the Tier 1
capital of a bank holding company to 25% of the sum of core capital elements (including restricted
core capital elements), net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. The new limit
would be effective on March 31, 2011. Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, recently passed in July 2010, has a provision to effectively phase out the use of
trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital throughout a
44
five-year period. As of September 30,
2010, the Corporation had $427 million in trust preferred securities (capital securities) that are
subject to the phase-out. As of September 30, 2010, the remaining trust preferred securities corresponded
to capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008, and were issued prior to October 4, 2010 and thus, are exempt from the Dodd-Frank
banking bill provision.
Note 18 Stockholders Equity
Increase in authorized shares of common stock
On May 4, 2010, following stockholder approval, the Corporation amended its certificate of
incorporation to provide for an increase in the number of shares of the Corporations common stock
authorized for issuance from 700 million shares to 1.7 billion shares.
Issuance of depositary shares representing preferred stock and conversion to shares of common
stock
In April 2010, the Corporation raised $1.15 billion through the sale of 46,000,000 depositary
shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in a share of Contingent Convertible Perpetual
Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D, no par value, $1,000 liquidation preference per share.
The preferred stock represented by depositary shares automatically converted into shares of
Popular, Inc.s common stock at a conversion rate of 8.3333 shares of common stock for each
depositary share on May 11, 2010, which was the 5th business day after the Corporations
common shareholders approved the amendment to the Corporations restated certificate of
incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock. The conversion of the
depositary shares of preferred stock resulted in the issuance of 383,333,333 additional shares of
common stock. The net proceeds from the public offering amounted to approximately $1.1 billion,
after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. Note 23 to the
consolidated financial statements provides information on the impact of the conversion on net
income per common share.
BPPR statutory reserve
The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPRs net
income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve
equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank
must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the
reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico
Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would
preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPRs statutory reserve fund totaled $402 million as of
September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $402 million; September 30, 2009 $392 million). There
were no transfers between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during
the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Note 19 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit amounted to $19 million and $116
million, respectively, as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $13 million and $134 million,
respectively; and September 30, 2009 $18 million and $162 million, respectively). In addition,
the Corporation has commitments to originate mortgage loans amounting to $64 million as of
September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $48 million; September 30, 2009 $55 million).
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.5 million (December 31, 2009 -
$0.7 million and September 30, 2009 $0.6 million), which represents the unamortized balance of
the obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit. The
Corporation recognizes at fair value the obligation at inception of the standby letters of credit.
The fair value approximates the fee received from the customer for issuing such commitments. These
fees are deferred and recognized over the commitment period. This liability is included as part of
other liabilities in the consolidated statements of condition. The contract amounts in standby
letters of credit outstanding represent the maximum potential amount of future payments the
Corporation could be required to make under the guarantees in the event of nonperformance by the
customers. These standby letters of credit are used by the customer as a credit enhancement and
typically expire without being drawn upon. In the event of nonperformance by the customers, the
Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral provided, if any, which
45
normally includes cash
and marketable securities, real estate, receivables, among others. Management does not anticipate
any material losses related to these instruments.
Commitments to extend credit, which include credit card lines, commercial lines of credit, and
other unused credit commitments, amounted to $6.2 billion as of September 30, 2010 (December 31,
2009 $7.0 billion; September 30, 2009 $7.0 billion), excluding the commitments to extend credit
that pertain to the lending relationships of the Westernbank operations.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $8 million for
potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines
of credit unrelated to the acquired lending relationships from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction (December 31, 2009 $15 million; September 30, 2009 $18 million). The estimated
reserve is principally based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and
the application of the corresponding reserve factors determined under the Corporations allowance
for loan losses methodology. This reserve for unfunded exposures remains separate and distinct from
the allowance for loan losses and is reported as part of other liabilities in the consolidated
statement of condition.
As of September 30, 2010, the commitments to extend credit related to the Westernbank acquired
lending relationships approximated $176 million. The acquired commitments to extend credit are
covered under the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, subject to FDIC approvals, limitations on
the timing for such disbursements, and servicing guidelines, among various considerations. As
indicated in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on the April 30, 2010 acquisition
date, the Corporation recorded a contingent liability for such commitments at fair value. As of
September 30, 2010, that contingent liability amounted to $120 million and is recorded as part of
other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition.
The Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to
limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral
for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may have sold, in bulk
sale transactions, residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse or to certain
representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser. These representations and
warranties may relate, for example, to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation, collateral,
prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required to repurchase the loans
under the credit recourse agreements or for breach of representations and warranties.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.1 billion (December 31, 2009 $4.5 billion;
September 30, 2009 $4.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse
provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and Freddie Mac programs. In the event of any
customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation may be required to
repurchase the loan or reimburse for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future
payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the
event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the
residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation repurchased approximately $93 million in mortgage
loans subject to the credit recourse provisions. In the event of nonperformance by the borrower,
the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation
suffers losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying
a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any
uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing of the related property. Most
claims associated with the residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions are
settled by repurchases of delinquent loans. As of September 30, 2010, the Corporations liability
established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with
credit recourse amounted to $38 million (December 31, 2009 $16 million; September 30, 2009 $16
million).
The probable losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a
liability when the loans are sold and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in
the line itemgain (loss) on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and
valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale in the consolidated statements of operations)
throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant information becomes
available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the recourse
arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include actual defaults and historical
loss experience, foreclosure rate,
46
estimated future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods
are used to estimate the recourse liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan
segmentations.The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan
over a twelve-month period, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability
of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become 90 days delinquent
within the following twelve-month period. Regression analysis quantifies the relationship between
the default event and loan-specific characteristics, including credit scores, loan-to-value rates,
loan aging, among others.
When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary
representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporations
mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged
for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or may
sell the loans directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. To the extent the loans do not
meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or
indemnify for losses. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures
are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. The
Corporation has not recorded any specific contingent liability in the consolidated financial
statements for these customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by the
Corporations mortgage operations in Puerto Rico, and management believes that, based on historical
data, the probability of payments and expected losses under these representations and warranty
arrangements is not significant.
Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to
mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the
Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and
insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. As of September 30, 2010,
the Corporation serviced $18.0 billion in mortgage loans, including the loans serviced with credit
recourse (December 31, 2009 $17.7 billion; September 30, 2009 $17.7 billion). The Corporation
generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from
liquidation proceeds from mortgage loans foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the
applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation
must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The
Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage
loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part
of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income
with respect to that loan. As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by
the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $25 million
(December 31, 2009 $14 million; September 30, 2009 $14 million). To the extent the mortgage
loans underlying the Corporations servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the
Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation
to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in
collection efforts.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation established reserves for customary representations and
warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN. Loans had been sold to investors on
a servicing released basis subject to certain representations and warranties. Although the risk of
loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation is required to make certain
representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if
not complied, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify
investors for any related losses associated to these loans. The loans had been sold prior to 2009.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporations reserve for estimated losses from such representation
and warranty arrangements amounted to $35 million, which was included as part of other liabilities
in the consolidated statement of condition (December 31, 2009 $33 million; September 30, 2009
$21 million). E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans, since the subsidiary ceased these
activities during 2008. On a quarterly basis, the Corporation reassesses its estimate for expected
losses associated to E-LOANs customary representation and warranty arrangements. The analysis
incorporates expectations on future disbursements based on quarterly repurchases and make-whole
events. The analysis also considers factors such as the average length-time between the loans
funding date and the loan repurchase date as observed in the historical loan data. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, E-LOAN charged-off approximately $8.8 million against this
representation and warranty reserve associated with loan repurchases and indemnification or
make-whole events (nine months ended September 30, 2009 $13.2 million). Make-whole events are
typically defaulted loans in which the investor attempts to recover through the collateral or
guarantees, and the seller is obligated to cover any impaired or unrecovered
47
portion of the loan.
Claims have been predominantly for first mortgage agency loans and principally consist of
underwriting errors related to undisclosed debt or missing documentation.
During 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for the breach of certain representations or
warranties in connection with various sales of assets by the discontinued operations of PFH. These
sales were on a non-credit recourse basis. The agreements primarily include indemnification for
breaches of certain key representations and warranties, some of which expire within a definite time
period; others survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and others do
not expire. Certain of the indemnifications are subject to a cap or maximum aggregate liability
defined as a percentage of the purchase price. The indemnifications agreements outstanding as of
September 30, 2010 are related principally to make-whole arrangements. As of September 30, 2010,
the Corporations reserve related to PFHs indemnity arrangements amounted to $4 million (December
31, 2009 $9 million; September 30, 2009 $19 million). During the nine months ended September
30, 2010, the Corporation recorded charge-offs with respect to the PFHs representation and
warranty arrangements amounting to approximately $2.3 million (nine months ended September 30, 2009
- $1.2 million). The reserve balance as of September 30, 2010 contemplates historical indemnity
payments. Certain indemnification provisions, which included, for example, reimbursement of
premiums on early loan payoffs and repurchase obligations for defaulted loans within a short-term
period, expired during 2009. Popular, Inc. Holding Company and Popular North America have agreed to
guarantee certain obligations of PFH with respect to the indemnification obligations.
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing
obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries totaling $0.6 billion
as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $0.6 billion; September 30, 2009 $0.7 billion). In
addition, as of September 30, 2010, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated
basis $1.4 billion of capital securities (trust preferred securities) (December 31, 2009 $1.4
billion; September 30, 2009 $1.4 billion) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the
extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated
financial statements for further information on the trust preferred securities.
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, as part of the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the true up
measurement date of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered
assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to
reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true up payment is recorded as a reduction
in the fair value of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset.
Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that the
final disposition of these matters, except for the matters described below which are each in early
stages and management cannot currently predict their outcome, will not have a material adverse
effect on the Corporations business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Between May 14, 2009 and September 9, 2009, five putative class actions and two derivative claims
were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico
Court of First Instance, San Juan Part, against Popular, Inc., certain of its directors and
officers, among others. The five class actions have now been consolidated into two separate
actions: a securities class action captioned Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al. (consolidated with Otero
v. Popular, Inc., et al.) and an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action
entitled In re Popular, Inc. ERISA Litigation (comprised of the consolidated cases of Walsh v.
Popular, Inc. et al.; Montañez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.).
On October 19, 2009, plaintiffs in the Hoff case filed a consolidated class action complaint which
included as defendants the underwriters in the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock, among
others. The consolidated action purports to be on behalf of purchasers of Populars securities
between January 24, 2008 and February 19, 2009 and alleges that the defendants violated Section
10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange
Act by issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading.
The consolidated action also alleges that the defendants violated Section 11, Section 12(a)(2) and
Section 15 of the Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts
48
necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading in
connection with the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock. The consolidated securities
class action complaint seeks class certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable
costs and expenses, including counsel fees. On January 11, 2010, Popular, the underwriter
defendants and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated securities class action
complaint. On August 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico granted the
motion to dismiss filed by the underwriter defendants on statute of limitations grounds. The Court
also dismissed the Section 11 claim brought against Populars directors on statute of limitations
grounds and the Section 12(a)(2) claim brought against Popular because plaintiffs lacked standing.
The Court declined to dismiss the claims brought against Popular and certain of its officers under
Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder), Section 20(a) of the
Exchange Act, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act, holding that plaintiffs had adequately
alleged that defendants made materially false and misleading statements with the requisite state of
mind.
On November 30, 2009, plaintiffs in the ERISA case filed a consolidated class action complaint. The
consolidated complaint purports to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc.
U.S.A. 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment
Plan from January 24, 2008 to the date of the Complaint to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409
and 502(a)(2) of ERISA against Popular, certain directors, officers and members of plan committees,
each of whom is alleged to be a plan fiduciary. The consolidated complaint alleges that the
defendants breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among other things, failing to
eliminate Popular stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The complaint seeks to recover
alleged losses to the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive relief and a constructive
trust, along with costs and attorneys fees. On December 21, 2009, and in compliance with a
scheduling order issued by the Court, Popular and the individual defendants submitted an answer to
the amended complaint. Shortly thereafter, on December 31, 2009, Popular and the individual
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint or, in the
alternative, for judgment on the pleadings. On May 5, 2010, a magistrate judge issued a report and
recommendation in which he recommended that the motion to dismiss be denied except with respect to
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, as to which he recommended that the motion be granted. On May 19,
2010, Popular filed objections to the magistrate judges report and recommendation. On June 21,
2010, plaintiffs filed a response to these objections. On July 9, 2010, with leave of the Court,
Popular filed a reply to plaintiffs response. On September 30, 2010, the Court issued an order
without opinion granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss and providing that the
Court would issue an opinion and order explaining its decision. To date, no opinion has been
issued. Discovery is ongoing in the ERISA case, and the parties have agreed to coordinate
discovery with respect to common issues with discovery in the García and Hoff cases.
The derivative actions (García v. Carrión, et al. and Díaz v. Carrión, et al.) have been brought
purportedly for the benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers
and directors and allege breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in
connection with our issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial
reports and the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaints seek a judgment
that the action is a proper derivative action, an award of damages and restitution, and costs and
disbursements, including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses. On October 9, 2009, the
Court coordinated for purposes of discovery the García action and the consolidated securities class
action. On October 15, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the García
complaint for failure to make a demand on the Board of Directors prior to initiating litigation. On
November 20, 2009, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, and on December 21, 2009, Popular and the
individual defendants moved to dismiss the García amended complaint. At a scheduling conference
held on January 14, 2010, the Court stayed discovery in both the Hoff and García matters pending
resolution of their respective motions to dismiss. On August 11, 2010, the Court granted in part
and denied in part the motion to dismiss the Garcia action. The Court dismissed the gross
mismanagement and corporate waste claims, but declined to dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty
claim. Discovery has now commenced in the Hoff and Garcia actions and is to proceed in coordinated
fashion. At the Courts request, the parties to the Hoff and Garcia cases discussed the prospect
of mediation and have agreed to nonbinding mediation in an attempt to determine whether the cases
can be settled.
The Díaz case, filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, San Juan, was removed to the U.S.
District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. On October 13, 2009, Popular and the individual
defendants moved to consolidate the
García and Díaz actions. On October 26, 2009, plaintiff moved to remand the Díaz case to the Puerto
Rico Court of First Instance and to stay defendants consolidation motion pending the outcome of
the remand proceedings. On
49
September 30, 2010, the Court issued an order without opinion remanding
the Diaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance. On October 13, 2010, the Court issued a
Statement of Reasons In Support of Remand Order. On October 28, 2010, Popular and the individual
defendants moved for reconsideration of the remand order. The reconsideration motion is pending.
On April 13, 2010, the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance in San Juan granted summary judgment
dismissing a separate complaint brought by plaintiff in the García action that sought to enforce an
alleged right to inspect the books and records of the Corporation in support of the pending
derivative action. The Court held that the plaintiff had not propounded a proper purpose under
Puerto Rico law for such inspection. On April 28, 2010, the plaintiff in that action moved for
reconsideration of the Courts dismissal. On May 4, 2010, the Court denied plaintiffs request for
reconsideration. On June 7, 2010, plaintiff filed an appeal before the Puerto Rico Court of
Appeals. On June 11, 2010, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the appeal. On
June 22, 2010, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. On July 6, 2010, plaintiff moved for
reconsideration of the Courts dismissal. On July 16, 2010, the Court of Appeals denied plaintiffs
request for reconsideration.
On October 7, 2010, a new putative class action suit for breach of contract and damages, captioned
Almeyda-Santiago v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, was filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance
against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. The complaint essentially asserts that plaintiff has suffered
damages because of Banco Populars alleged fraudulent overdraft fee practices in connection with debit
card transactions. Such practices allegedly consist of: (a) the reorganization of electronic debit
transactions in high-to-low order so as to multiply the number of overdraft fees assessed on its customers;
(b) the assessment of overdraft fees even when clients have not overdrawn their accounts; (c) the failure
to disclose, or to adequately disclose, its overdraft policy to its customers; and (d) the provision of false
and fraudulent information regarding its clients account balances at point of sale transactions and on its
website. Plaintiff seeks damages, restitution and provisional remedies against Banco Popular for breach of
contract, abuse of trust, illegal conversion and unjust enrichment.
The Corporation intends to contend vigorously these
claims.
At this early stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse
outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporations results of
operations.
Note 20 Non-Consolidated Variable Interest Entities
The Corporation transfers residential mortgage loans in guaranteed loan securitizations. The
Corporations continuing involvement in these transfers includes owning certain beneficial
interests in the form of securities as well as the servicing rights retained. The Corporation is
not required to provide additional financial support to any of the variable interest entities to
which it has transferred the financial assets. The mortgage-backed securities, to the extent
retained, are classified in the Corporations consolidated statement of condition as
available-for-sale or trading securities.
The Corporation is involved with various special purpose entities mainly in guaranteed mortgage
securitization transactions. These special purpose entities are deemed to be variable interest
entities (VIEs) since they lack equity investments at risk. As part of the adoption of ASU
2009-17, during the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation evaluated these guaranteed mortgage
securitization structures in which it participates, including GNMA and FNMA, and concluded that the
Corporation is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, and therefore, are not required to be
consolidated in the Corporations financial statements. The Corporation qualitatively assessed
whether it held a controlling financial interest in these VIEs, which included analyzing if it had
both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be
significant to the VIE. The Corporation concluded that, essentially, these entities (FNMA and GNMA)
control the design of the VIE, dictate the quality and nature of the collateral, require the
underlying insurance, set the servicing standards via the servicing guides and can change them at
will, and remove a primary servicer with cause, and without cause in the case of FNMA. Moreover,
through their guarantee obligations, agencies (FNMA and GNMA) have the obligation to absorb losses
that could be potentially significant to the VIE. The conclusion on the assessment of these
guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions did not change during the third quarter of 2010.
The Corporation holds variable interests in these VIEs in the form of agency mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, including those securities originated by the
Corporation and those acquired from third parties. Additionally, the Corporation holds agency
mortgage-backed securities, agency collateralized mortgage obligations and private label
collateralized mortgage obligations issued by third party VIEs in which it has no other form of
continuing involvement. Refer to Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for additional
information on the debt securities outstanding as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009, which are classified as available-for-sale and trading securities in the
Corporations consolidated statement of condition. In addition, the Corporation may retain the
right to service the transferred loans in those government-sponsored special purpose entities
(SPEs)
and may also purchase the right to service loans in other government-sponsored SPEs that were
transferred to those SPEs by a third-party. Pursuant to ASC Subtopic 810-10, the servicing fees
that the Corporation receives for its servicing role are considered variable interests in the VIEs
because the servicing fees are
50
subordinated to the principal and interest that first needs to be paid to the mortgage-backed
securities investors and to the guaranty fees that need to be paid to the federal agencies.
The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets related to the
Corporations variable interests in non-consolidated VIEs and the maximum exposure to loss as a
result of the Corporations involvement as servicer with non-consolidated VIEs as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
104,978 |
|
|
$ |
104,984 |
|
|
Total servicing assets |
|
$ |
104,978 |
|
|
$ |
104,984 |
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing advances |
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
108,317 |
|
|
$ |
107,013 |
|
|
Maximum exposure to loss |
|
$ |
108,317 |
|
|
$ |
107,013 |
|
|
The size of the non-consolidated VIEs, in which the Corporation has a variable interest in the
form of servicing fees, measured as the total unpaid principal balance of the loans, amounted to
$9.4 billion as of September 30, 2010 and $9.3 billion as of December 31, 2009.
Maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss, under a worst case scenario, that would be
incurred by the Corporation, as servicer for the VIEs, assuming all loans serviced are delinquent
and that the value of the Corporations interests and any associated collateral declines to zero,
without any consideration of recovery. The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss
includes the fair value of the MSRs and the assumption that the servicing advances as of September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 will not be recovered. The agency debt securities are not included
as part of the maximum exposure to loss since they are guaranteed by the related agencies.
Note 21 Fair Value Measurement
ASC Subtopic 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels in
order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures. The
hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1- Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these
instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are
based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2- Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3- Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs
by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted
market prices when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs
internally-developed models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest
rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those
necessary to ensure that the financial instruments fair value is adequately representative of the
price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include amounts that
reflect counterparty credit quality, the Corporations credit standing, constraints on liquidity
and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently.
The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of
significant
51
judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in
calculating the fair value could significantly affect the results.
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporations assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009
and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
private
label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
2,783 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5,730 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
5,741 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6,269 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
6,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($91 |
) |
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($18 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($109 |
) |
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
private
label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
3,210 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6,658 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
6,695 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6,962 |
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
7,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
3,445 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6,955 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
6,993 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
7,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($89 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($89 |
) |
|
54
The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains |
|
settlements, |
|
Transfers |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
(losses) |
|
and |
|
in (out) |
|
of |
|
held as of |
|
|
|
|
as of June |
|
included in |
|
paydowns |
|
of Level |
|
September |
|
September |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
30, 2010 |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
(net) |
|
3 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
($25 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
($25 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
|
114 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
|
($88 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
|
($88 |
) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
($10 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
[b] |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
|
($9 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
($113 |
) |
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
[b] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
settlements, |
|
Transfers |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
and |
|
in (out) |
|
of |
|
held as of |
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
included in |
|
paydowns |
|
of Level |
|
September |
|
September |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
(net) |
|
3 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($27 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($27 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
|
224 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
($34 |
) |
|
|
($170 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
($34 |
) |
|
|
($170 |
) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[b] |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
|
($20 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
($12 |
) |
|
|
[c] |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
|
($15 |
) |
|
|
($18 |
) |
|
|
($197 |
) |
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
|
($12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Gains are included in OCI |
|
[b] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
[c] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
Gains (losses) |
|
in accrued |
|
and |
|
of |
|
held as of |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
included in |
|
interest |
|
paydowns |
|
September |
|
September 30, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
receivable |
|
(net) |
|
30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
|
284 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
233 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($53 |
) |
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
|
($7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
|
($4 |
) |
|
|
[b] |
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair value
pursuant to fair value option |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[c] |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
|
($7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($49 |
) |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
[b] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
|
[c] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the statement of operations |
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities still |
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
in accrued |
|
and |
|
Balance as of |
|
held as of |
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
included in |
|
interest |
|
paydowns |
|
September |
|
September 30, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
receivable |
|
(net) |
|
30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
|
292 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
233 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($60 |
) |
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
[a] |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
|
($16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
[b] |
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair value
pursuant to fair value option |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[c] |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
|
($14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($49 |
) |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
[b] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
|
[c] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the
statement of operations |
During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, there were $113 million and $197
million, respectively, in transfers out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value
on a recurring basis. These transfers resulted from exempt FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed
securities, which were transferred out of Level 3 and into Level 2, as a result of a change in
valuation methodology from an internally-developed pricing matrix to pricing them based on a bonds
theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector. Their fair value
incorporates an option adjusted spread. Pursuant to the Corporations policy, these transfers were
recognized as of the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers in and / or out of Level
1 during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
There were no transfers in and / or out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value
on a recurring basis during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009. There were no
transfers in and / or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the quarter and nine months ended September
30, 2009.
58
Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the quarters and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous
tables are reported in the consolidated statement of operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2010 |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
|
included in |
|
still held at |
|
included in |
|
still held at |
(In millions) |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
reporting date |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
reporting date |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees |
|
|
($10 |
) |
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
($12 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
($9 |
) |
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
($15 |
) |
|
|
($12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
|
included in |
|
still held at |
|
included in |
|
still held at |
(In millions) |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
reporting date |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
reporting date |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees |
|
|
($7 |
) |
|
|
($4 |
) |
|
|
($16 |
) |
|
|
($6 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from
discontinued
operations, net of
tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
($7 |
) |
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
|
($14 |
) |
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
Additionally, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Corporation may
be required to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent
to their initial recognition. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of
lower of cost or fair value accounting, identification of impaired loans requiring specific
reserves under ASC Section 310-10-35 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, or
write-downs of individual assets. The following tables present financial and non-financial assets
that were subject to a fair value measurement on a nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, and which were still included in the consolidated statement of
condition as of such dates. The amounts disclosed represent the aggregate fair value measurements
of those assets as of the end of the reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of September 30, 2010 |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
649 |
|
|
$ |
649 |
|
Loans held-for-sale [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other real estate owned [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was
measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take
into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations,
in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. |
|
[2] |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans
transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were
principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. |
|
[3] |
|
Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate owned that were measured at fair value. |
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of September 30, 2009 |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
Other real estate owned (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Other foreclosed assets (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The
impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is
derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions
involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance
with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. |
|
[2] |
|
Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned
that were measured at fair value. |
|
|
Following is a description of the Corporations valuation methodologies used for assets and
liabilities measured at fair value. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial
instruments and non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value of the financial
instruments disclosed do not represent managements estimate of the underlying value of the
Corporation.
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities: The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities is based on yields
that are interpolated from the constant maturity treasury curve. These securities are
classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities: The Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities include U.S. agency securities, which fair value is based on an active
exchange market and on quoted market prices for similar securities. The U.S. agency
securities are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Obligations of Puerto
Rico, States and political subdivisions include municipal bonds. The bonds are segregated
and the like characteristics divided into specific sectors. Market inputs used in the
evaluation process include all or some of the following: trades, bid price or spread, two
sided markets, quotes, benchmark curves including but not limited to Treasury benchmarks,
LIBOR and swap curves, market data feeds such as MSRB, discount and capital rates, and
trustee reports. The municipal bonds are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies: Certain agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS)
are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality
and market sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The agency MBS
are classified as Level 2. Other agency MBS such as GNMA Puerto Rico Serials are priced
using an internally-developed pricing matrix with quoted prices from local broker dealers.
These particular MBS are classified as Level 3. |
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: Agency and private collateralized mortgage
obligations (CMOs) are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds
defined by credit quality and market sector and for which fair value incorporates an option
adjusted spread. The option adjusted spread model includes prepayment and volatility
assumptions, ratings (whole loans collateral) and spread adjustments. These CMOs are
classified as Level 2. Other CMOs, due to their limited liquidity, are classified as Level
3 due to the insufficiency of inputs such as broker quotes, executed trades, credit
information and cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active
exchange market are classified as Level 1. Other equity securities that do not trade in
highly liquid markets are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Corporate note (included as other in the available-for-sale category): The corporate
note is priced based on a spread to the U.S. Treasury market and adjustments may apply
based on observable market inputs such as sector, maturity, credit standing and reported
trade frequencies. This corporate note is |
60
|
|
|
classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities and mutual funds (included as other in the trading account
securities category): Quoted prices for these security types are obtained from broker
dealers. Given that the quoted prices are for similar instruments or do not trade in highly
liquid markets, the corporate securities and mutual funds are classified as Level 2. The
important variables in determining the prices of Puerto Rico tax-exempt mutual fund shares
are net asset value, dividend yield and type of assets in the fund. All funds trade based
on a relevant dividend yield taking into consideration the aforementioned variables. In
addition, demand and supply also affect the price. Corporate securities that trade less
frequently or are in distress are classified as Level 3. |
Mortgage servicing rights
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices.
MSRs are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers
servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges,
other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Due to the unobservable
nature of certain valuation inputs, the MSRs are classified as Level 3.
Derivatives
Interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options are traded in over-the-counter active
markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or
equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing
models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and have quoted prices, such as
forward contracts or to be announced securities (TBAs). All of these derivatives are classified
as Level 2. The non-performance risk is determined using internally-developed models that consider
the collateral held, the remaining term, and the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the
risk, and uses available public data or internally-developed data related to current spreads that
denote their probability of default.
Equity appreciation instrument
Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the terms of the
equity appreciation instrument. The fair value of the equity appreciation instrument was estimated
by determining a call option value using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The principal
variables in determining the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument include the implied
volatility determined based on the historical daily volatility of the Corporations common stock,
the exercise price of the instrument, the price of the call option, and the risk-free rate. The
equity appreciation instrument is classified as Level 2.
Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral
dependent
The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from
appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Currently, the
associated loans considered impaired are classified as Level 3.
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to lower of cost or fair value adjustments
Loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis pursuant to lower of cost or fair value were
priced based on bids received from potential buyers, secondary market prices, and discounted cash
flow models which incorporate internally-developed assumptions for prepayments and credit loss
estimates. These loans are classified as Level 3.
Other real estate owned and other foreclosed assets
Other real estate owned includes real estate properties securing mortgage, consumer, and commercial
loans. Other foreclosed assets include automobiles securing auto loans. The fair value of
foreclosed assets may be determined using an external appraisal, broker price opinion or an
internal valuation. These foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3 given certain internal
adjustments that may be made to external appraisals.
61
Note 22 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial
instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and
may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.
The information about the estimated fair values of financial instruments presented hereunder
excludes all nonfinancial instruments and certain other specific items.
Derivatives are considered financial instruments and their carrying value equals fair value.
For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been
estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as managements
best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of
future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions.
The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing interest rate
environment as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. In different interest
rate environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain fixed rate
financial instruments. In addition, the fair values presented do not attempt to estimate the value
of the Corporations fee generating businesses and anticipated future business activities, that is,
they do not represent the Corporations value as a going concern. Accordingly, the aggregate fair
value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation. The methods and
assumptions used to estimate the fair values of significant financial instruments as of September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are described in the paragraphs below.
Short-term financial assets and liabilities have relatively short maturities, or no defined
maturities, and little or no credit risk. The carrying amounts of other liabilities reported in the
consolidated statements of condition approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of
those instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Included in this
category are: cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, bankers acceptances and assets sold under
agreements to repurchase and short-term borrowings. The equity appreciation instrument is included
in other liabilities and is accounted at fair value. Note 21 to the consolidated financial
statements provides a description of the valuation methodology for the equity appreciation
instrument. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term maturities are valued using discounted
cash flows based on market rates currently available for agreements with similar terms and
remaining maturities.
Trading and investment securities, except for investments classified as other investment securities
in the consolidated statement of condition, are financial instruments that regularly trade on
secondary markets. The estimated fair value of these securities was determined using either market
prices or dealer quotes, where available, or quoted market prices of financial instruments with
similar characteristics. Trading account securities and securities available-for-sale are reported
at their respective fair values in the consolidated statements of condition since they are
marked-to-market for accounting purposes.
The estimated fair value for loans held-for-sale was based on secondary market prices, bids
received from potential buyers and discounted cash flow models. The fair values of the loans
held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar characteristics. Loans were
segregated by type such as commercial, construction, residential mortgage, consumer, and credit
cards. Each loan category was further segmented based on loan characteristics, including interest
rate terms, credit quality and vintage. Generally, fair values were estimated based on an exit
price by discounting scheduled cash flows for the segmented groups of loans using a discount rate
that considers interest, credit and expected return by market participant under current market
conditions. Additionally, prepayment, default and recovery assumptions have been applied in the
mortgage loan portfolio valuations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair
valuation of the lease financing portfolio, therefore it is included in the loans total at its
carrying amount.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits,
savings, NOW, and
money market accounts was, for purposes of this disclosure, equal to the amount payable on demand
as of the
62
respective dates. The fair value of certificates of deposit was based on the discounted value of
contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on certificates with similar maturities.
The value of these deposits in a transaction between willing parties is in part dependent of the
buyers ability to reduce the servicing cost and the attrition that sometimes occurs. Therefore,
the amount a buyer would be willing to pay for these deposits could vary significantly from the
presented fair value.
Long-term borrowings were valued using discounted cash flows, based on market rates currently
available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and in certain instances using
quoted market rates for similar instruments as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
As part of the fair value estimation procedures of certain liabilities, including repurchase
agreements (regular and structured) and FHLB advances, the Corporation considered, where
applicable, the collateralization levels as part of its evaluation of non-performance risk. Also,
for certificates of deposit, the non-performance risk was determined using internally-developed
models that consider, where applicable, the collateral held, amounts insured, the remaining term,
and the credit premium of the institution.
Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the FDIC loss share
indemnification asset, equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC and the contingent
liability on unfunded loan commitments, which are separately disclosed in the table below and all
relate to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. The latter two items are included as other
liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition.
Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar
agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was
estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. The fair value of letters
of credit was based on fees currently charged on similar agreements.
Carrying or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and money market investments |
|
$ |
2,604,760 |
|
|
$ |
2,604,760 |
|
|
$ |
1,680,127 |
|
|
$ |
1,680,127 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
483,192 |
|
|
|
483,192 |
|
|
|
462,436 |
|
|
|
462,436 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
5,741,483 |
|
|
|
5,741,483 |
|
|
|
6,694,714 |
|
|
|
6,694,714 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
214,152 |
|
|
|
214,803 |
|
|
|
212,962 |
|
|
|
213,146 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
158,309 |
|
|
|
159,622 |
|
|
|
164,149 |
|
|
|
165,497 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
115,088 |
|
|
|
120,916 |
|
|
|
90,796 |
|
|
|
91,542 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
24,904,715 |
|
|
|
22,181,399 |
|
|
|
22,451,909 |
|
|
|
20,021,224 |
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
3,308,959 |
|
|
|
3,371,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
27,740,045 |
|
|
$ |
27,867,432 |
|
|
$ |
25,924,894 |
|
|
$ |
26,076,515 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,358,139 |
|
|
|
2,523,779 |
|
|
|
2,632,790 |
|
|
|
2,759,438 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
191,342 |
|
|
|
191,342 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
5,143,388 |
|
|
|
5,090,470 |
|
|
|
2,648,632 |
|
|
|
2,453,037 |
|
Contingent liability on unfunded loan
commitments |
|
|
120,162 |
|
|
|
120,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
17,465 |
|
|
|
17,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
6,297,380 |
|
|
$ |
1,016 |
|
|
$ |
7,013,148 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
134,663 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
147,647 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
63
Note 23 Net Income per Common Share
The computation of net income per common share (EPS) follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
|
($121,561 |
) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($340,720 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
Deemed dividend on preferred stock [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
Favorable impact from exchange of shares of Series A and B
preferred stock for common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,388 |
|
Favorable impact from exchange of Series C preferred stock
for trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
$ |
595,614 |
|
|
$ |
161,944 |
|
|
$ |
310,604 |
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
1,021,374,014 |
|
|
|
425,672,578 |
|
|
|
839,196,564 |
|
|
|
330,325,348 |
|
Average potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
1,021,374,014 |
|
|
|
425,672,578 |
|
|
|
839,509,525 |
|
|
|
330,325,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Basic and diluted EPS from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
Basic and diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Deemed dividend related to the issuance of depositary shares and the conversion of the
preferred stock into shares of common stock in the second quarter of 2010. |
|
[2] |
|
Amount presented for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 represents the reversal of dividends
on Series C preferred stock considered accrued as of June 30, 2009 for EPS purposes only. These
cumulative dividends were not paid as dividends to the Series C preferred stockholders given the
terms of the exchange agreement to New Trust Preferred Securities, which was effected in August
2009. |
|
|
The conversion of contingently convertible perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock into
shares of the Corporations common stock during the second quarter of 2010, resulted in a
non-cash beneficial conversion of $191.7 million, representing the intrinsic value between the
conversion rate of $3.00 and the common stock closing price of $3.50 on April 13, 2010, the date
the preferred shares were offered. The beneficial conversion was recorded as a deemed dividend
to the preferred stockholders reducing retained earnings, with a corresponding offset to surplus
(paid in capital), and thus did not affect total stockholders equity or the book value of the
common stock. However, the deemed dividend decreased the net income applicable to common stock
and affected the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. Moreover, in computing diluted EPS, dilutive convertible securities that remained
outstanding for the period prior to actual conversion were not included as average potential
common shares because the effect would have been antidilutive. In computing both basic and
diluted EPS, the common shares issued upon actual conversion were included in the weighted
average calculation of common shares, after the date of conversion, provided that they remained
outstanding.
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock
options and restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that
the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise, in addition to the amount
of compensation cost attributed to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the
exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares
purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute
diluted earnings per share. Warrants, stock options and restricted stock awards that result in
lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not
included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an
antidilutive effect in earnings per common share.
For the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, there were 2,530,137 and
2,537,563 weighted average antidilutive stock options outstanding, respectively (September 30,
2009 2,674,505 and 2,770,846). Additionally, the Corporation has outstanding a warrant to
purchase 20,932,836 shares of common stock, which has an antidilutive effect as of September 30,
2010.
64
Note 24 Other Service Fees
The caption of other service fees in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the
following major categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Debit card fees |
|
$ |
27,711 |
|
|
$ |
26,986 |
|
|
$ |
83,480 |
|
|
$ |
80,867 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
24,382 |
|
|
|
23,497 |
|
|
|
73,692 |
|
|
|
70,951 |
|
Processing fees |
|
|
15,258 |
|
|
|
13,638 |
|
|
|
43,390 |
|
|
|
40,773 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
|
11,855 |
|
|
|
11,463 |
|
|
|
34,929 |
|
|
|
36,014 |
|
Sale and administration of investment products |
|
|
11,379 |
|
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
28,791 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
Other fees |
|
|
10,237 |
|
|
|
13,849 |
|
|
|
41,585 |
|
|
|
44,775 |
|
|
Total other service fees |
|
$ |
100,822 |
|
|
$ |
97,614 |
|
|
$ |
305,867 |
|
|
$ |
298,584 |
|
|
Note 25 Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The Corporation has noncontributory defined benefit pension plans (the retirement plans) and
supplementary benefit pension plans for regular employees of certain of its subsidiaries. Effective
May 1, 2009, the accrual of the benefits under the BPPR retirement plan was frozen to all
participants. Pursuant to the amendment, the retirement plan participants will not receive any
additional credit for compensation earned and service performed after April 30, 2009 for purposes
of calculating benefits under the retirement plans.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Corporation amended the pension and postretirement benefits
as a result of the EVERTEC sale. The amendment to the pension plan increased the pension plan
liability by approximately $6.3 million, which will be amortized as pension cost in future periods.
During the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation settled its U.S. retirement plan, which had been
frozen in 2007. The U.S. retirement plan assets are expected to be distributed to plan participants
during the fourth quarter of 2010.
The components of net periodic pension cost for the quarters and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Restoration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Restoration |
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Plans |
|
Pension Plans |
|
Plans |
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
Quarters ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
7,804 |
|
|
$ |
8,041 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
23,710 |
|
|
|
24,630 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(7,655 |
) |
|
|
(6,221 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(23,208 |
) |
|
|
(19,320 |
) |
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
(932 |
) |
Amortization of prior service
cost (credit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
3,203 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
6,579 |
|
|
|
10,590 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
2,316 |
|
|
$ |
5,023 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
7,081 |
|
|
$ |
19,274 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
Curtailment loss (gain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
Settlement loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
$ |
2,316 |
|
|
$ |
5,023 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
10,461 |
|
|
$ |
20,094 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
968 |
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation made contributions to the
pension and benefit restoration plans amounting to $23.5 million. The total contributions expected
to be paid during the year 2010 for the pension and benefit restoration plans amount to
approximately $25.8 million.
65
The Corporation also provides certain health care benefits for retired employees of certain
subsidiaries. The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the quarters and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
1,647 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
6,078 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
|
(784 |
) |
Amortization of net gain |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
1,485 |
|
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
|
$ |
4,455 |
|
|
$ |
6,941 |
|
Termination benefit cost |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
$ |
2,156 |
|
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
|
$ |
5,126 |
|
|
$ |
6,941 |
|
|
Contributions made to the postretirement benefit plan for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 amounted to approximately $3.9 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during the
year 2010 for the postretirement benefit plan amount to approximately $5.2 million.
Note 26 Stock-Based Compensation
The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the Stock Option Plan), which permitted the
granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or
non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders
adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan), which replaced and
superseded the Stock Option Plan. The adoption of the Incentive Plan did not alter the original
terms of the grants made under the Stock Option Plan prior to the adoption of the Incentive Plan.
Stock Option Plan
Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate
in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the
absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock
Option Plan. This plan provided for the issuance of Popular, Inc.s common stock at a price equal
to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to
be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The
Corporations policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each
grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement
provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional
20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of
employment due to retirement.
The following table presents information on stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Not in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Remaining Life of |
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Average |
Exercise Price |
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price of |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
|
Exercise Price of |
Range per Share |
|
Outstanding |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
In Years |
|
(fully vested) |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
$14.39 - $18.50 |
|
|
1,231,412 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
|
1,231,412 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
$19.25 - $27.20 |
|
|
1,298,725 |
|
|
$ |
25.21 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
1,298,725 |
|
|
$ |
25.21 |
|
|
$14.39 - $27.20 |
|
|
2,530,137 |
|
|
$ |
20.65 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
|
2,530,137 |
|
|
$ |
20.65 |
|
|
There was no intrinsic value of options outstanding as of September 30, 2010 (September 30,
2009 $0.3 million). There was no intrinsic value of options exercisable as of September 30, 2010
and 2009.
66
The following table summarizes the stock option activity and related information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding as of January 1, 2009 |
|
|
2,965,843 |
|
|
$ |
20.59 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(59,631 |
) |
|
|
26.42 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(353,549 |
) |
|
|
19.25 |
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,552,663 |
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(22,526 |
) |
|
|
19.56 |
|
|
Outstanding as of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
2,530,137 |
|
|
$ |
20.65 |
|
|
The stock options exercisable as of September 30, 2010 totaled 2,530,137 (September 30, 2009
2,585,523). There were no stock options exercised during the quarters and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Thus, there was no intrinsic value of options exercised during
the quarters and nine month-periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
There were no new stock option grants issued by the Corporation under the Stock Option Plan during
2009 and 2010.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, there was no stock option expense recognized (September
30, 2009 $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $40 thousand). For the nine months ended September
30, 2010, there was no stock option expense recognized (September 30, 2009 $162 thousand, with a
tax benefit of $45 thousand).
Incentive Plan
The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards,
Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate as determined by the Board).
Employees and directors of the Corporation and / or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to
participate in the Incentive Plan. The shares may be made available from common stock purchased by
the Corporation for such purpose, authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock.
The Corporations policy with respect to the shares of restricted stock has been to purchase such
shares in the open market to cover each grant.
Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation has issued restricted shares, which become vested based
on the employees continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the
compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong
vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant
and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and
10 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after
attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service.
67
The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members
of management:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested as of January 1, 2009 |
|
|
248,339 |
|
|
$ |
22.83 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(104,791 |
) |
|
|
21.93 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(5,036 |
) |
|
|
19.95 |
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
138,512 |
|
|
$ |
23.62 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,525,416 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(314,284 |
) |
|
|
8.34 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(185,844 |
) |
|
|
3.21 |
|
|
Non-vested as of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,163,800 |
|
|
$ |
3.58 |
|
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, no shares of restricted stock were awarded to
management under the Incentive Plan. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, 1,525,416
shares of restricted stock were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan, from which
1,253,551 shares of restricted stock were awarded to management consistent with the requirements of
the TARP Interim Final Rule. The shares of restricted stock, which were awarded to management
consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule, were determined upon consideration
of managements execution of critical 2009 initiatives to manage the Corporations liquidity and
capitalization, strategically reposition its United States operations, and improve management
effectiveness and cost control. The shares will vest on the secondary anniversary of the grant
date, and they may become payable in 25% increments as the Corporation repays each 25% portion of
the aggregate financial assistance received under the United States Treasury Departments Capital
Purchase Program under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. In addition, the grants
are also subject to further performance criteria as the Corporation must achieve profitability for
at least one fiscal year for awards to be payable. During the quarter and nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009, no shares of restricted stock were awarded to management under the Incentive
Plan.
Beginning in 2007, the Corporation authorized the issuance of performance shares, in addition to
restricted shares, under the Incentive Plan. The performance share awards consist of the
opportunity to receive shares of Popular, Inc.s common stock provided that the Corporation
achieves certain performance goals during a three-year performance cycle. The compensation cost
associated with the performance shares is recorded ratably over a three-year performance period.
The performance shares are granted at the end of the three-year period and vest at grant date,
except when the participants employment is terminated by the Corporation without cause. In such
case, the participant would receive a pro-rata amount of shares calculated as if the Corporation
would have met the performance goal for the performance period.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, 41,710
shares have been granted under this plan (September 30, 2009 35,397).
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $0.6 million of restricted
stock expense related to management incentive awards, with tax benefit of $0.2 million (September
30, 2009 $0.6 million, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million). For the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $0.7 million of restricted stock expense related to
management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $0.3 million (September 30, 2009 $1.4
million, with a tax benefit of $0.5 million). The fair market value of the restricted stock vested
was $3.2 million at grant date and $0.9 million at vesting date. This triggers a shortfall, net of
windfalls, of $2.3 million that was recorded as an additional income tax expense at the applicable
income tax rate, net of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. During the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $0.3 million of performance shares expense, with a
tax benefit of $0.1 million (September 30, 2009 $0.3 million, with a tax benefit of $107
thousand). During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $0.5
million of performance share expense, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million (September 30, 2009
$0.6 million, with a tax benefit of $129 thousand). The total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested restricted stock awards and performance shares to members of management as of
September 30, 2010 was $2.2 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 3 years.
68
The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for
members of the Board of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested as of January 1, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
270,515 |
|
|
$ |
2.62 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(270,515 |
) |
|
|
2.62 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
272,828 |
|
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(272,828 |
) |
|
|
2.97 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation granted 30,434 shares of
restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and BPPR, which became
vested at grant date (September 30, 2009 78,070). During this period, the Corporation recognized
$0.1 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax
benefit of $48 thousand (September 30, 2009 $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $47 thousand).
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation granted 272,828 shares of
restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and BPPR, which became
vested at grant date (September 30, 2009 251,993). During this period, the Corporation
recognized $0.4 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with
a tax benefit of $0.2 million (September 30, 2009 $0.3 million, with a tax benefit of $141
thousand). The fair value at vesting date of the restricted stock vested during 2010 for directors
was $0.8 million.
Note 27 Income Taxes
The reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Balance as of January 1 |
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.5 |
|
Additions for tax positions January through March |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Reduction as a result of settlements January through March |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
Balance as of March 31 |
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
Additions for tax positions April through June |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Reduction for tax positions April through June |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30 |
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
$ |
42.2 |
|
Additions for tax positions July through September |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Additions for tax positions taken in prior years July through September |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction as a result of lapse of statute of limitations July through September |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reduction for tax positions July through September |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
Balance as of September 30 |
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, the related accrued interest approximated $6.5 million (September
30, 2009 $6.3 million). Management determined that as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 there was no
need to accrue for the payment of penalties.
After consideration of the effect on U.S. federal tax of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, the
total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico, that if recognized,
would affect the Corporations effective tax rate, was approximately $33.8 million as of September
30, 2010 (September 30, 2009 $45.7 million).
69
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons
including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due
to the statutes of limitation, changes in managements judgment about the level of uncertainty,
status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of
uncertain tax positions.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. As of
September 30, 2010, the following years remain subject to examination in the U.S. Federal
jurisdiction: 2008 and thereafter; and in the Puerto Rico jurisdiction, 2006 and thereafter. During
2010, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed an examination of the Corporations U.S.
operations tax return for 2007, and as a result, the Corporation recognized a tax benefit of $14.3
million during the first quarter of 2010.
The Corporation does not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits within the next 12 months.
The following table presents the components of the Corporations deferred tax assets and
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits available for carryforward |
|
$ |
8,310 |
|
|
$ |
11,026 |
|
Net operating loss and donation carryforward available |
|
|
972,397 |
|
|
|
843,968 |
|
Postretirement and pension benefits |
|
|
95,621 |
|
|
|
103,979 |
|
Deferred loan origination fees |
|
|
7,797 |
|
|
|
7,880 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
533,611 |
|
|
|
536,277 |
|
Deferred gains |
|
|
13,163 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
Accelerated depreciation |
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
Intercompany deferred gains |
|
|
4,818 |
|
|
|
7,015 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
20,969 |
|
|
|
39,096 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
1,659,015 |
|
|
$ |
1,565,699 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences between assigned values and the tax basis of the
assets and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations |
|
$ |
63,977 |
|
|
$ |
25,896 |
|
Difference in outside basis between financial and tax reporting on
sale of a business |
|
|
11,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs |
|
|
8,280 |
|
|
|
9,708 |
|
Unrealized net gain on trading and available-for-sale securities |
|
|
56,954 |
|
|
|
30,323 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
5,923 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
141,463 |
|
|
$ |
71,850 |
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets less liabilities |
|
$ |
1,517,552 |
|
|
$ |
1,493,849 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance |
|
|
1,191,951 |
|
|
|
1,129,882 |
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
325,601 |
|
|
$ |
363,967 |
|
|
The net deferred tax asset shown in the table above as of September 30, 2010 is reflected in
the consolidated statement of condition as $336.7 million in deferred tax assets (in the other
assets caption) and $11.1 million in deferred tax liabilities (in the other liabilities
caption), reflecting the aggregate deferred tax assets or liabilities of individual tax-paying
subsidiaries of the Corporation.
A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all
available evidence; it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or
the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to
reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The
determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available
evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets,
including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of
sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The
analysis considers all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset,
including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary
70
differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards,
taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies.
The Corporations U.S. mainland operations are in a cumulative loss position for the three-year
period ended September 30, 2010. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax
assets in the U.S. mainland, this cumulative taxable loss position is considered significant
negative evidence and has caused management to conclude that the Corporation will not be able to
realize the associated deferred tax assets in the future. As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation
recorded a valuation allowance of $1.2 billion on the deferred tax asset of its U.S. operations. As
of September 30, 2010, the Corporations deferred tax assets (net of deferred tax liability)
related to its Puerto Rico operations amounted to $345.8 million and the deferred tax liability,
net of the valuation allowance, of its U.S. operations amounted to $20.2 million. The Corporation
assessed the realization of the Puerto Rico portion of the net deferred tax asset and based on the
weighting of all available evidence has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net
deferred tax assets will be realized.
Note 28 Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Additional disclosures on non-cash activities for the nine-month period are listed in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate |
|
$ |
147,577 |
|
|
$ |
116,200 |
|
Loans transferred to other property |
|
|
28,785 |
|
|
|
29,331 |
|
|
Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets |
|
|
176,362 |
|
|
|
145,531 |
|
Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale |
|
|
24,458 |
|
|
|
32,270 |
|
Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
9,679 |
|
|
|
175,043 |
|
Loans securitized into investment securities [a] |
|
|
633,821 |
|
|
|
1,112,061 |
|
Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
11,909 |
|
|
|
19,640 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,139 |
|
Change in par value of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,689,389 |
|
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock converted |
|
|
(1,150,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
1,341,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities exchanged for new common stock issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities exchanged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(397,911 |
) |
New common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
317,652 |
|
Preferred stock exchanged for new common stock issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock exchanged (Series A and B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(524,079 |
) |
New common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,691 |
|
Preferred stock exchanged for new trust preferred securities issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock exchanged (Series C) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(901,165 |
) |
New trust preferred securities issued (junior subordinated debentures) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,885 |
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Includes loans securitized into investment securities and subsequently sold before quarter end. |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the changes in operating assets and liabilities
included in the reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities, as well
as the changes in assets and liabilities presented in the investing and financing sections are net
of the effect of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition and
balances of the assets and liabilities recorded at fair value by the Corporation on April 30, 2010.
The cash received in the transaction, which amounted to $261 million, is presented in the investing
activities section of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as Cash received from acquisition.
Note 29 Segment Reporting
The Corporations corporate structure consists of two reportable segments Banco Popular de
Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America.
71
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on September 30, 2010, the
Corporation completed the sale of a 51% ownership interest in EVERTEC, which included the merchant
acquiring business of BPPR. EVERTEC was reported as a reportable segment prior to September 30,
2010, while the merchant acquiring business was originally included in the BPPR reportable segment
through June 30, 2010. As a result of the sale, the Corporation no longer presents EVERTEC as a
reportable segment and therefore, historical financial information for the processing and merchant
acquiring businesses has been reclassified under Corporate group for all periods presented.
Additionally, the Corporation retained EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA, C.A. and its equity investments in
CONTADO and Serfinsa, which were included in the EVERTEC reportable segment through June 30, 2010,
and are now also included in the Corporate group for all periods presented. Revenue from the
remaining ownership interest in EVERTEC will be prospectively reported as non-interest income in
the Corporate group.
Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate
performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the
organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on
the products and services offered by the segments.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico:
Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporations
results of operations and total assets as of September 30, 2010, additional disclosures are
provided for the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below:
|
|
Commercial banking represents the Corporations banking operations conducted at BPPR, which
are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes aspects of the
lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory services. BPPR
allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer pricing at market
rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds, as well
as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus on
retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as the
lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto and
lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally in residential mortgage loan
originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related with the
investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate share of the
investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR, the
brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance agency
and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular Risk
Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these subsidiaries
generate profits based on fee income. |
Banco Popular North America:
Banco Popular North Americas reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA,
E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. BPNA operates through
a retail branch network in the U.S. mainland, while E-LOAN supports BPNAs deposit gathering
through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during the fourth
quarter of 2008. Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. also holds a running-off loan portfolio as this
subsidiary ceased originating loans during 2009. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment
and insurance services across the BPNA branch network.
The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North
America and Popular International Bank, including the equity investments in CONTADO and Serfinsa.
Also, as discussed previously, it includes the results of EVERTEC for all periods presented. The
Corporate group also includes the expenses of certain corporate areas that are identified as
critical to the organization: Finance, Risk Management and Legal.
The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the
Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates,
resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations.
72
The results of operations included in the tables below for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
exclude the results of operations of the discontinued business of PFH. Segment assets as of
September 30, 2009 also exclude the assets of the discontinued operations.
2010
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
Intersegment |
|
Reportable |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
Eliminations |
|
Segments |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
336,580 |
|
|
$ |
77,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
414,045 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
182,153 |
|
|
|
32,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,013 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
92,937 |
|
|
|
13,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,098 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
10,024 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,184 |
|
(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
9,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,698 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
210,264 |
|
|
|
58,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,288 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
12,996 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,794 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
12,546 |
|
|
|
($14,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($2,076 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
31,129,147 |
|
|
$ |
9,328,402 |
|
|
|
($34,485 |
) |
|
$ |
40,423,064 |
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
($27,289 |
) |
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
386,918 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,013 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
730,583 |
|
|
|
(40,157 |
) |
|
|
796,524 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
4,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,325 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,448 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
99,399 |
|
|
|
(40,324 |
) |
|
|
327,363 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
87,382 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
102,388 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
496,453 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
5,580,042 |
|
|
|
($5,182,390 |
) |
|
$ |
40,820,716 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
Intersegment |
|
Reportable |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
Eliminations |
|
Segments |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
787,923 |
|
|
$ |
231,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,019,565 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
412,792 |
|
|
|
244,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,471 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
327,920 |
|
|
|
45,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,566 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,371 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
29,097 |
|
|
|
7,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,138 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
9,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,676 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
584,283 |
|
|
|
186,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
770,858 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
26,304 |
|
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,686 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
58,546 |
|
|
|
($176,615 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($118,069 |
) |
|
73
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
($85,241 |
) |
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
934,811 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,471 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
905,146 |
|
|
|
(108,464 |
) |
|
|
1,170,248 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
10,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,084 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,426 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
237,082 |
|
|
|
(107,489 |
) |
|
|
900,451 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
82,983 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
113,101 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
472,600 |
|
|
|
($920 |
) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
2009
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
Intersegment |
|
Reportable |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
Eliminations |
|
Segments |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
217,750 |
|
|
$ |
77,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
295,338 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
153,350 |
|
|
|
177,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
109,083 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,478 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,180 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
9,316 |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,995 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
175,412 |
|
|
|
70,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,457 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($13,547 |
) |
|
|
($169,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($183,464 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
23,868,954 |
|
|
$ |
11,443,083 |
|
|
|
($29,284 |
) |
|
$ |
35,282,753 |
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
($19,232 |
) |
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
276,389 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
83,201 |
|
|
|
(38,635 |
) |
|
|
160,044 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,430 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(78,337 |
) |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
69,767 |
|
|
|
(33,129 |
) |
|
|
282,095 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,976 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
65,929 |
|
|
|
($4,026 |
) |
|
|
($121,561 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
5,523,711 |
|
|
|
($5,168,660 |
) |
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
74
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
Intersegment |
|
Reportable |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
Eliminations |
|
Segments |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
650,679 |
|
|
$ |
234,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
885,608 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
486,343 |
|
|
|
566,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
562,466 |
|
|
|
15,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578,358 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
3,869 |
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,600 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
28,463 |
|
|
|
8,258 |
|
|
|
($22 |
) |
|
|
36,699 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
530,174 |
|
|
|
236,453 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
766,622 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
|
(5,692 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(9,920 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
167,580 |
|
|
|
($557,622 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
($390,026 |
) |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
($54,489 |
) |
|
$ |
816 |
|
|
$ |
831,935 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
246,245 |
|
|
|
(103,989 |
) |
|
|
720,614 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
12,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,033 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(78,337 |
) |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
210,136 |
|
|
|
(98,263 |
) |
|
|
878,495 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(6,120 |
) |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
(15,209 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
53,125 |
|
|
|
($3,819 |
) |
|
|
($340,720 |
) |
|
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment
are as follows:
2010
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
164,890 |
|
|
$ |
169,401 |
|
|
$ |
2,240 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
336,580 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
155,561 |
|
|
|
26,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,153 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
65,951 |
|
|
|
26,321 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
92,937 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
4,482 |
|
|
|
5,245 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,024 |
|
Gain on early
extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
71,588 |
|
|
|
121,229 |
|
|
|
17,543 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
210,264 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(25,120 |
) |
|
|
33,993 |
|
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
12,996 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
($40,881 |
) |
|
$ |
47,049 |
|
|
$ |
6,417 |
|
|
|
($39 |
) |
|
$ |
12,546 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
16,242,839 |
|
|
$ |
22,081,935 |
|
|
$ |
974,816 |
|
|
|
($8,170,443 |
) |
|
$ |
31,129,147 |
|
|
75
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
309,391 |
|
|
$ |
471,221 |
|
|
$ |
7,130 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
787,923 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
306,278 |
|
|
|
106,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,792 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
78,922 |
|
|
|
174,319 |
|
|
|
74,796 |
|
|
|
(117 |