fv1za
As
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2011
Registration No. 333-162630
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form F-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
FREESEAS INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Republic of the Marshall Islands
|
|
4412
|
|
Not Applicable |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Classification Code Number)
|
|
Identification Number) |
89 Akti Miaouli & 4 Mavrokordatou Street
185 38, Piraeus, Greece
011-30-210-452-8770
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrants principal
executive offices)
Broad and Cassel
Attention: A. Jeffry Robinson, P.A.
2 S. Biscayne Boulevard, 21st Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone: (305) 373-9400
Facsimile: (305) 995-6402
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent
for service)
With a copy to:
|
|
|
A. Jeffry Robinson, Esq.
|
|
Stephen P. Farrell, Esq. |
Broad and Cassel
|
|
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP |
2 S. Biscayne Blvd., 21st Floor
|
|
101 Park Avenue |
Miami, Florida 33131
|
|
New York, New York 10178 |
Telephone: (305) 373-9400
|
|
(212) 309-6000 |
Facsimile: (305) 995-6402 |
|
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after
the effective date of this registration statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or
continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.
o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule
462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number
of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number
of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be
necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in
accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement
shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer
to buy these securities in any state or other jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION, MARCH 30, 2011
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS
FreeSeas Inc.
[ ] Shares of Common Stock
We
are offering [ ] shares of our common stock. Our common stock is currently
quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol FREE. On March 28, 2011, the last reported
sale price of our common stock was $2.78 per share.
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. See Risk Factors beginning on
page 11 to read about the risks you should consider
before buying shares of our common stock.
________________
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has
approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Total |
|
Public offering price |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Placement
agents fees |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds to us, before expenses |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
In addition, we have granted Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, as placement agent, an option, which
we refer to as the agents option, to place up to an additional shares of our
common stock at the same price as the offering price to the public. The agents option is
exercisable, in whole or in part, at the sole option of Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, as placement
agent, at any time up to two business days prior to the closing of the offering. This prospectus
includes the offer and sale of the shares of our common stock upon
any exercise of the agents option.
If the agents option is fully exercised, the total public offering price, agents fees and
proceeds, before expenses, to us, will be $ , $ and $ ,
respectively. A purchaser who acquires shares of our common stock forming part of the agents
option, if applicable, acquires those shares under this prospectus.
We are offering and selling the shares of our common stock pursuant to a placement agency
agreement between us and Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, as placement agent, in connection with this
offering. The placement agent is not required to purchase or sell any shares of our common stock
offered hereby nor is it required to sell any specific number or dollar amount of shares of our
common stock, but will use its best efforts to arrange for the sale of all of the shares offered
hereby. Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to the closing of this
offering, the actual offering amount, placement agents fees, and proceeds, before expenses, to us
are not presently determinable and may be substantially less than the maximum amounts set forth
in this prospectus.
We expect the shares of our common stock offered hereby to be delivered on or about
, 2011, or such earlier date as we and the placement agent may agree following the completion of
the placement of the shares of our common stock offered pursuant to this prospectus.
________________
DAHLMAN ROSE & COMPANY
________________
The date of this prospectus is , 2011.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Neither
the placement agent nor we have authorized anyone to give any information or to make any
representations other than those contained in this prospectus. Do not rely upon any information or
representations made outside of this prospectus. This prospectus is not an offer to sell, and it is
not soliciting an offer to buy any securities other than the shares of common stock offered hereby,
or such shares in any circumstances in which our offer or solicitation is unlawful. The information
contained in this prospectus may change after the date of this prospectus. Do not assume after the
date of this prospectus that the information contained in this prospectus is still correct.
We obtained statistical data, market data and other industry data and forecasts used
throughout this prospectus from publicly available information. While we believe that the
statistical data, industry data, forecasts and market research are reliable, we have not
independently verified the data, and we do not make any representation as to the accuracy of the
information.
i
ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITIES
FreeSeas Inc. is a Marshall Islands company and our executive offices are located outside of
the United States in Piraeus, Greece. Some of our directors, officers and experts named
in this prospectus reside outside the United States. In addition, a substantial portion of our
assets and the assets of our directors, officers and experts are located outside of the United
States. As a result, you may have difficulty serving legal process within the United States upon us
or any of these persons. You may also have difficulty enforcing, both in and outside the United
States, judgments you may obtain in U.S. courts against us or these persons in any action,
including actions based upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal or state securities
laws. Furthermore, there is substantial doubt that the courts of the Marshall Islands or Greece
would enter judgments in original actions brought in those courts predicated on U.S. federal or
state securities laws.
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
References in this prospectus to FreeSeas, we, us, our or company refer to FreeSeas
Inc. and our subsidiaries, but, if the context otherwise requires, may refer only to FreeSeas Inc.
We use the term deadweight tons, or dwt, in describing the capacity of our drybulk
carriers. Dwt, expressed in metric tons, each of which is equivalent to 1,000 kilograms, refers to
the maximum weight of cargo and supplies that a vessel can carry. Drybulk carriers are generally
categorized as Handysize, Handymax, Panamax and Capesize. The carrying capacity of a Handysize
drybulk carrier typically ranges from 10,000 to 39,999 dwt and that of a Handymax drybulk carrier
typically ranges from 40,000 to 59,999 dwt. By comparison, the carrying capacity of a Panamax
drybulk carrier typically ranges from 60,000 to 79,999 dwt and the carrying capacity of a Capesize
drybulk carrier typically is 80,000 dwt and above.
Unless otherwise indicated:
|
|
|
|
All references to $ and dollars in this prospectus are to U.S. dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial information presented in this prospectus that is derived from
financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus is prepared in
accordance with the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All references to dollar amounts in this prospectus are expressed in thousands
of U.S. dollars. |
|
All share-related and per share information in this prospectus have been adjusted to give
effect to the one share for five share reverse stock split that was effective on October 1, 2010.
ii
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights certain information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. For a more
complete understanding of this offering, you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including
the risk factors and the financial statements.
Our Company
We are an international drybulk shipping company incorporated under the laws of the Republic
of the Marshall Islands with principal executive offices in Piraeus, Greece. Our fleet currently
consists of seven Handysize vessels and two Handymax vessels that carry a variety of drybulk
commodities, including iron ore, grain and coal, which are referred to as major bulks, as well as
bauxite, phosphate, fertilizers, steel products, cement, sugar and rice, or minor bulks.
Additionally, we entered into contracts to purchase two newbuilding Handysize bulk carriers, of
approximately 33,600 dwt each, with a Chinese shipyard. These new vessels are scheduled for
delivery in the second and third quarters of 2012. As of March 28, 2011, the aggregate dwt of our
fleet is approximately 274,000 dwt and the average age of our fleet is approximately 14 years.
We are currently focusing on the Handysize and Handymax sectors, which we believe are more
versatile in the types of cargoes that they can carry and trade routes they can follow, and offer
less volatile returns than larger vessel classes. We may, however, acquire larger drybulk vessels
if desirable opportunities arise.
We have contracted the management of our fleet to Free Bulkers S.A., referred to as our
Manager, an entity controlled by Ion G. Varouxakis, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and one of our principal shareholders. Our Manager provides technical management of our
fleet, accounting services and office space. Our Manager has subcontracted the charter and
post-charter management of our fleet to Safbulk Pty Ltd., a company controlled by the Restis
family, which also is one of our principal shareholders. While Safbulk is responsible for finding
and arranging charters for our vessels, the final decision to charter our vessels remains with us.
Our Fleet
The following table presents our fleet information as of March 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Name |
|
Type |
|
Built |
|
Dwt |
|
Employment |
M/V
Free Lady
|
|
Handymax
|
|
2003
|
|
50,246
|
|
About 3-5 month time charter at $14,000 per day for the first 120
days and $15,500 for the balance period through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V
Free Jupiter
|
|
Handymax
|
|
2002
|
|
47,777
|
|
About 65 day time charter trip at $6,750 per day and $13,000 for any
day in excess of 80 days through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V
Free Knight
|
|
Handysize
|
|
1998
|
|
24,111
|
|
80 day time charter trip at $10,000 per day through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V
Free Maverick
|
|
Handysize
|
|
1998
|
|
23,994
|
|
About 62 day time charter trip at $9,100 per day through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V
Free Impala
|
|
Handysize
|
|
1997
|
|
24,111
|
|
25 day time charter trip at $13,000 per day through April
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V
Free Neptune
|
|
Handysize
|
|
1996
|
|
30,838
|
|
4-6 months time charter at $14,000 per day for the first 115 days and
$15,250 thereafter, through April/July 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V
Free Hero
|
|
Handysize
|
|
1995
|
|
24,318
|
|
20-25 day time charter trip at $13,250 per day through
April 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V
Free Goddess
|
|
Handysize
|
|
1995
|
|
22,051
|
|
25 day time charter trip at $12,500 per day through March/April 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V
Free Envoy
|
|
Handysize
|
|
1984
|
|
26,318
|
|
35-40 day time charter trip at $8,250 per day through April 2011 |
1
We are taking steps to renew our fleet and, in that regard, we have initiated a plan to sell
the M/V Free Impala, the M/V Free Neptune and the M/V Free Hero. In addition, we may determine to
sell one of our other vessels, such as the M/V Free Envoy, our oldest vessel. There can be no
assurances that we will be able to obtain prices that are acceptable to us or that we will
otherwise be able to negotiate satisfactory terms of sale.
Competitive Strengths
We believe that we possess a number of strengths that provide us with a competitive advantage
in the drybulk shipping industry, including:
|
|
|
|
Experienced management team. We have benefited from the expertise of our
executive officers including that of Ion G. Varouxakis, our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, and that of our Managers personnel, which consists of
seasoned shipping professionals with long-standing experience in the industry. We
believe that our management team and our Manager have strengthened our balance sheet
while actively and decisively renewing the fleet throughout the challenging economic
climate experienced both industry-wide and world-wide during the past several years: |
|
|
|
- |
|
We restructured certain of our debt agreements, providing us
with additional financial flexibility, while maintaining a low cost of funding
(a weighted average interest rate of 3.0% for the year ended December 31,
2010), which has allowed the continued growth of our fleet. |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
We successfully initiated our fleet renewal program, first by
acquiring, in August 2009, the M/V Free Neptune, a 30,838 dwt, 1996-built
drybulk carrier. We subsequently placed an order for the construction of two
33,600 dwt drybulk carriers for delivery within the second and third quarters
of 2012. We also sold the M/V Free Destiny, a 25,240 dwt, 1982-built drybulk
carrier, which was delivered to its buyers in July 2010. |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
We have secured additional committed indebtedness of up to
$38,400 in the last two years. Of this total commitment, $6,000 had been drawn
as of December 2010. In this process, we have developed new relationships with
additional financial institutions and banks. |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
We have maintained a strong operating performance of 97% for
the year ended December 31, 2010, which may be considered remarkable
considering the type of vessels and the average age of our fleet, while keeping
costs on what we believe to be the lower end of the industry average. |
|
|
|
|
|
Solid balance sheet. We have strengthened our balance sheet through the reduction of
our net debt to $110.4 million as of December 31, 2010, translating into a net debt to total
capitalization ratio of 44%. This ratio is calculated by subtracting cash from debt and
dividing by the sum of liabilities and shareholders equity. We believe that the maintenance
of a reasonable ratio of debt to total capitalization is an important measurement of our
ability to borrow funds to make additional vessel acquisitions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic relationships. We have extensive experience and relationships with
ship brokers, financial institutions, industrial partners and commodity traders. We use
these relationships to identify chartering and acquisition opportunities and in order
to make available to us sources of additional financing, to make industry contacts, and
to gain market intelligence. Our current specialization in a single asset class allows
us to not only monitor markets with a single measure, but also makes us the partner of
choice for businesses that have a need or requirement for a Handysize specialist. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost effective and efficient operations. Through our Manager, we believe that
we have established a strong track record in the technical management of drybulk
carriers which has enabled us to maintain cost-efficient operations. We actively
monitor and control vessel operating expenses while maintaining the high quality of our
fleet through regular inspections, balanced maintenance programs, high standards of
operation, and retaining and training qualified crew members. |
|
2
Business Strategy
Our primary objectives are to profitably grow our business and maximize value to our
shareholders by pursuing the following strategies:
|
|
|
|
Handysize and Handymax focus. Our fleet of drybulk carriers consists of
Handysize and Handymax vessels, although we may consider acquiring larger vessels if we
identify appropriate opportunities. Given the relatively low number of Handysize and
Handymax drybulk vessels on order, and a relatively great number of Handysize and
Handymax drybulk vessels at an age of 20 years or older, we believe there will be
continued demand for such vessels. Handysize and Handymax vessels are typically
shallow-drafted and equipped with onboard cranes. This makes them more versatile and
able to access a wider range of loading and discharging ports than larger ships that
are unable to service many ports due to their size or the lack of local port
infrastructure. Many countries in the Asia Pacific region, including China, as well as
countries in Africa and South America, have shallow ports. We believe that our vessels,
and any Handysize or Handymax vessels that we may acquire, should enable us to
transport a wider variety of cargoes and to pursue a greater number of chartering
opportunities than if we owned larger drybulk vessels. Handysize and Handymax vessels
have also historically achieved greater charter rate stability than larger drybulk
vessels. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renew and expand our fleet. We intend to continue growing our fleet in a
disciplined manner through acquisition of well-maintained, secondhand vessels or
selective investments in newbuildings. Since prices for vessels have fallen
significantly since the middle of 2008, we expect to have significant opportunities to
acquire high quality, high specification secondhand vessels or newbuildings for
attractive prices. We perform a technical review and financial analysis of each
potential acquisition and only purchase vessels as market conditions and opportunities
dictate and warrant. Furthermore, as part of our fleet renewal program, we will
continue to sell vessels in order to renew our fleet when we believe it is in our and
our shareholders best interests. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimize our employment mix. We intend to continue to deploy a large part of
our fleet primarily in the spot market, depending on our view of the direction of the
markets and other tactical or strategic considerations. The spot market is volatile and
holds the potential for significant increases or decreases in shipping rates over time.
Additionally, we may pursue time charter coverage to provide cash flow to cover part of
our fleets fixed costs and lock some of our vessels into medium to long-term charters
depending on our views of the market. We believe this employment strategy will allow us
to participate in the potential upside of the spot market during periods of rising
charter rates while providing us with more predictable operating cash flows and some
downside protection. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of flexible financial strategy. We have used and intend to continue to use
a conservative combination of bank debt, cash flow from operations and proceeds from
equity offerings to fund our vessel acquisitions. We assess the level of debt we will
incur in light of our ability to repay that debt based on the level of cash flow we
expect to generate pursuant to our chartering strategy and our operating cost
structure. We believe that the maintenance of a reasonable ratio of net debt to total
capitalization will be important to our ability to borrow funds to make additional
vessel acquisitions. In 2009, we suspended the payment of cash dividends on our common
stock because of prevailing economic conditions and to comply with restrictions in
certain of our loan agreements. Because economic conditions remain uncertain, and
because we are focusing on the renewal of our fleet, we have determined not to resume
the payment of cash dividends at this time. |
|
Recent Developments
Newbuilding Contracts
On August 17, 2010, we entered into two newbuilding contracts with a Chinese shipyard for the
construction of two Handysize drybulk vessels of approximately 33,600 dwt each, for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $48,800 (excluding extra costs of approximately $920). The vessels
are scheduled for delivery in the second and third quarters of 2012.
3
Commitments for Pre-Delivery and Post-Delivery Financing for Newbuildings
On September 10, 2010, we signed an offer letter with ABN AMRO Bank securing, subject to
customary legal documentation, for binding commitments for
partial pre-delivery and
post-delivery debt financing up to an amount of $32.4 million for the purchase of the two
newbuilding vessels described above. The balance of the purchase price for the two new vessels,
approximately $17.3 million, is anticipated to be financed through cash from operations and net
proceeds from the sale of vessels.
1:5 Reverse Stock Split
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on September 30, 2010, our shareholders approved a
reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock, effective on October 1, 2010, at a
ratio of one share for every five shares outstanding. The reverse stock split consolidates five
shares of common stock into one share of common stock, par value of $.001 per share, and resulted
in proportional adjustments to the shares underlying and the exercise
prices of our outstanding stock options, Class A and Class Z warrants, and Series A Participating Preferred Stock underlying our shareholder rights plan.
Vessels Classified as Held for Sale and Impairment Charges
On October 1, 2010, we classified the M/V Free Hero, a 1995-built 24,318 dwt Handysize drybulk
vessel, as held for sale for the year ended December 31, 2010 at its estimated market value, less
cost to sell, as all criteria required for the classification of a vessel as held for sale were
met. To date, no agreement has been reached to sell the M/V Free Hero. Additionally, on February
28, 2011, we initiated a plan of sale of the M/V Free Neptune, a 1996-built 30,838 dwt Handysize
drybulk vessel, and M/V Free Impala, a 1997-built 24,111 dwt Handysize drybulk vessel. We have
individually assessed for recoverability the carrying values of each of the above vessels. We have
recorded at December 31, 2010 an impairment loss of $26.6 million by reference to the fair market
values of the M/V Free Hero and the M/V Free Impala. No impairment loss was recognized for the M/V
Free Neptune as its fair value exceeded its carrying value.
Our Corporate History
We were incorporated on April 23, 2004 under the name Adventure Holdings S.A. pursuant to
the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands to serve as the parent holding company of our
ship-owning entities. On April 27, 2005, we changed our name to FreeSeas Inc.
We became a public reporting company on December 15, 2005, when we completed a merger with
Trinity Partners Acquisition Company Inc., or Trinity, a blank check company formed to serve as a
vehicle to complete a business combination with an operating business, in which we were the
surviving corporation. At the time of the merger we owned three drybulk carriers. We currently own
nine vessels, each of which is owned through a separate wholly owned subsidiary.
In January 2007, Ion G. Varouxakis purchased all of the common stock owned by our two other
co-founding shareholders. He simultaneously sold a portion of the common stock owned by him to FS
Holdings Limited, an entity controlled by the Restis family, and to certain other investors.
Immediately following these transactions, our Board of Directors appointed Ion G. Varouxakis
Chairman of the Board and President, our two other co-founding shareholders and one other director
resigned from the Board of Directors, and two new directors were appointed to fill the vacancies.
On September 30, 2010, our shareholders approved a one-for-five reverse split of our
outstanding common stock effective October 1, 2010.
As of March 28, 2011, we had outstanding 6,487,852 shares of our common stock and 1,655,006
Class Z warrants, which expire on July 29, 2011.
Our common stock and Class Z warrants currently trade on the NASDAQ Global Market under the
trading symbols FREE and FREEZ, respectively.
4
Our Executive Offices
Our principal executive offices are located at 89 Akti Miaouli & 4 Mavrokordatou Street, 185
38, Piraeus, Greece and our telephone number is 011-30-210-452-8770.
5
THE OFFERING
The following is a brief summary of certain terms of this offering and is not intended to be
complete. It does not contain all of the information that will be important to a holder of shares
of our common stock. For a more complete description of the shares of our common stock, see the
section entitled Description of Securities in this prospectus.
|
|
|
Issuer:
|
|
FreeSeas Inc. |
|
|
|
Offering:
|
|
Up
to shares of our common stock(1) |
|
|
|
Amount:
|
|
Up to $15,000,000 |
|
|
|
Price to the Public:
|
|
$ per share |
|
|
|
Agents Option:
|
|
We have granted to the placement agent an agents
option, exercisable in whole or in part, at the sole
option of Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, as placement
agent, at any time up to two business days prior to the
closing of the offering to place up to an additional
shares of our common stock at the public
offering price. |
|
|
|
Shares of Common
Stock Outstanding
After this
Offering:(2)
|
|
shares (shares if the agents option is
exercised in full) |
|
|
|
Placement Agents Fee:
|
|
We have agreed to pay the placement agent a fee equal to
$ for each share of our common stock sold
pursuant to the offering. See the section entitled
Plan of Distribution in this prospectus. |
|
|
|
Use of Proceeds:
|
|
We estimate that we will receive net proceeds of
approximately $ from this offering assuming
an offering price of $ per share ($ if the
agents option is exercised in full) after deducting the
placement agents fee and estimated offering expenses. |
|
|
|
|
|
We intend to use the proceeds of this offering to repay
a portion of our outstanding indebtedness to Deutsche
Bank Nederland, to purchase additional vessels, and for
general working capital purposes. See Use of
Proceeds. |
|
|
|
NASDAQ Global Market
Symbols:
|
|
Common Stock FREE
Class Z Warrants FREEZ |
|
|
|
|
Dividends:
|
|
In 2009, we suspended the payment of cash dividends on our common stock
because of prevailing economic conditions and to comply with restrictions in certain of our loan agreements.
Because economic conditions remain uncertain, and because we are focusing on the renewal of our fleet, we have determined not to resume the payment
of cash dividends at this time. See Dividend Policy. |
|
|
|
|
Risk Factors:
|
|
Investing in our common stock involves substantial risk.
You should carefully consider all the information in
this prospectus prior to investing in our common stock.
In particular, we urge you to consider carefully the
factors set forth in the section of this prospectus
entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 11. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each share of our common stock includes one right that, under certain
circumstances, will entitle the holder to purchase from us one
one-thousandth of a share of our Series A Participating Preferred
Stock at an exercise price of $90.00, subject to specified adjustment. |
|
(2) |
|
The number of shares of common stock outstanding after this offering
is based on 6,487,852 shares of our |
6
|
|
|
|
|
common stock outstanding on March
28, 2011 and excludes the following: |
|
A. |
|
Up to 12,000 shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of vested stock options
currently outstanding, which have an exercise price of $41.25 per share and expire on
December 24, 2012, and up to 216,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options that
may be granted in the future under our stock incentive plan; and |
|
|
B. |
|
361,001 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding
warrants, as follows: |
|
|
|
150,000 Class A warrants held by our founding shareholders
exercisable at $5.00 per 1/5 of a share, or $25.00 per share, only exercisable
for whole shares, and expiring July 29, 2011; and |
|
|
|
|
1,655,006 Class Z warrants exercisable at $5.00 per 1/5 of a
share, or $25.00 per share, only exercisable for whole shares, and expiring
July 29, 2011. |
Assuming all outstanding stock options and warrants were exercised for cash, we would receive
gross proceeds of approximately $9.5 million.
7
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND DATA
The following summary financial information and data were derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
The information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our historical
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, in our
annual report on Form 20-F filed on April 14, 2009 for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the
section of this prospectus titled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations. The historical data included below and elsewhere in this prospectus are not
necessarily indicative of our future performance.
All amounts in the tables below are in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for share data, per
share data and per diem amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
57,650 |
|
|
$ |
57,533 |
|
|
$ |
66,689 |
|
|
$ |
20,147 |
|
|
$ |
11,727 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
(1,887 |
) |
|
|
(1,394 |
) |
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(689 |
) |
Commissions |
|
|
(3,357 |
) |
|
|
(3,089 |
) |
|
|
(3,383 |
) |
|
|
(1,095 |
) |
|
|
(799 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
(18,607 |
) |
|
|
(17,813 |
) |
|
|
(16,354 |
) |
|
|
(6,001 |
) |
|
|
(4,483 |
) |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
(15,365 |
) |
|
|
(16,006 |
) |
|
|
(13,349 |
) |
|
|
(4,435 |
) |
|
|
(4,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred charges |
|
|
(1,888 |
) |
|
|
(1,742 |
) |
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management and other fees to a related party |
|
|
(1,978 |
) |
|
|
(1,874 |
) |
|
|
(2,634 |
) |
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(4,494 |
) |
|
|
(4,156 |
) |
|
|
(2,863 |
) |
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
|
|
(2,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision and write-offs of insurance
claims and bad debts |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of vessel |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel impairment loss |
|
|
(26,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
(17,000 |
) |
|
$ |
11,459 |
|
|
$ |
26,570 |
|
|
$ |
5,761 |
|
|
$ |
(2,281 |
) |
Interest and finance costs |
|
|
(4,375 |
) |
|
|
(4,323 |
) |
|
|
(6,453 |
) |
|
|
(5,774 |
) |
|
|
(1,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on derivative instruments |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(1,456 |
) |
|
|
(749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Other |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(21,821 |
) |
|
$ |
6,859 |
|
|
$ |
19,192 |
|
|
$ |
(156 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(3.46 |
) |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
4.57 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(3.46 |
) |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares |
|
|
6,313,606 |
|
|
|
5,092,772 |
|
|
|
4,201,299 |
|
|
|
1,757,613 |
|
|
|
1,258,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares |
|
|
6,313,606 |
|
|
|
5,092,772 |
|
|
|
4,210,393 |
|
|
|
1,757,613 |
|
|
|
1,258,376 |
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.875 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, including cash |
|
$ |
27,691 |
(A) |
|
$ |
22,125 |
|
|
$ |
27,184 |
|
|
$ |
81,440 |
|
|
$ |
1,417 |
|
Vessels, net |
|
|
213,691 |
|
|
|
270,701 |
|
|
|
275,405 |
|
|
|
108,021 |
|
|
|
19,369 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
250,984 |
|
|
|
297,321 |
|
|
|
307,861 |
|
|
|
191,972 |
|
|
|
23,086 |
|
Total current liabilities,
including current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
29,819 |
(B) |
|
|
29,488 |
|
|
|
50,768 |
|
|
|
34,097 |
|
|
|
10,260 |
|
Derivative financial
instruments, net of current
portion |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including
shareholder loans net of
current portion |
|
|
97,437 |
|
|
|
122,559 |
|
|
|
133,650 |
|
|
|
44,500 |
|
|
|
5,819 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
127,794 |
|
|
|
152,869 |
|
|
|
187,006 |
|
|
|
79,346 |
|
|
|
16,079 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
123,190 |
|
|
|
144,452 |
|
|
|
120,855 |
|
|
|
112,626 |
|
|
|
7,007 |
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Includes a vessel held for sale in the amount of $13,606. |
|
|
|
(B) |
|
Includes the estimated loan prepayment amount of $8,760 relating
to a vessel held for sale. |
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Other Financial Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
operating activities |
|
$ |
20,802 |
|
|
|
21,391 |
|
|
$ |
32,563 |
|
|
$ |
5,071 |
|
|
$ |
1,078 |
|
Net cash used in
investing activities |
|
|
(2,819 |
) |
|
|
(11,302 |
) |
|
|
(182,539 |
) |
|
|
(86,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
(used in) financing
activities |
|
|
(20,630 |
) |
|
|
(7,126 |
) |
|
|
89,960 |
|
|
|
144,930 |
|
|
|
(3,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Performance Indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (1)
|
|
$ |
26,834 |
|
|
$ |
30,337 |
|
|
$ |
41,517 |
|
|
$ |
8,249 |
|
|
$ |
3,435 |
|
Fleet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of vessels (2)
|
|
|
9.65 |
|
|
|
9.35 |
|
|
|
7.36 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
Ownership days (3)
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
3,414 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
Available days (4)
|
|
|
3,430 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
Operating days (5)
|
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
Fleet utilization (6)
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
94 |
% |
Average Daily Results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average TCE rate (7)
|
|
$ |
15,742 |
|
|
$ |
16,105 |
|
|
$ |
25,719 |
|
|
$ |
17,925 |
|
|
$ |
10,881 |
|
Vessel operating expenses (8)
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
5,218 |
|
|
|
6,084 |
|
|
|
4,976 |
|
|
|
4,094 |
|
Management fees (9)
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
General and administrative
expenses (10)
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
Total vessel operating
expenses (11)
|
|
|
5,843 |
|
|
|
5,767 |
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
5,577 |
|
|
|
4,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation to net income: Adjusted EBITDA represents net earnings before
taxes, depreciation and amortization, amortization of deferred revenue, back log asset, (gain)/loss
on derivative instruments, stock-based compensation expense, vessel impairment loss, interest and
finance cost, net, (gain)/loss on sale of vessel and provision and write-offs of insurance claims
and bad debts. Under the laws of the Marshall Islands, we are not subject to tax on international
shipping income. However, we are subject to registration and tonnage taxes, which have been
included in vessel operating expenses. Accordingly, no adjustment for taxes has been made for
purposes of calculating Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and does not
represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from
operations, as determined by United States generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP,
and our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to that reported by other companies.
Adjusted EBITDA is included herein because it is an alternative measure of our performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(21,821 |
) |
|
|
6,859 |
|
|
$ |
19,192 |
|
|
$ |
(156 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,324 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
17,253 |
|
|
|
17,748 |
|
|
|
14,137 |
|
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
|
4,921 |
|
Amortization of deferred revenue |
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Back log asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
Vessel impairment loss |
|
|
26,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/loss on derivative instruments |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and finance cost, net of
interest income |
|
|
4,338 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
|
|
5,873 |
|
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
(Gain) on sale of vessel |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision and write-offs of
insurance claims and bad debts |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
26,834 |
|
|
$ |
30,337 |
|
|
$ |
41,517 |
|
|
$ |
8,249 |
|
|
$ |
3,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Average number of vessels is the number of vessels that
constituted our fleet for the relevant period, as measured by the
sum of the number of days each vessel was a part of our fleet
during the period divided by the number of calendar days in the
period. |
|
(3) |
|
Ownership days are the total number of days in a period during
which the vessels in our fleet have been owned by us. Ownership
days are an indicator of the size of our fleet over a period and
affect both the amount of revenues and the amount of expenses
that we record during a period. |
9
(4) |
|
Available days are the number of ownership days less the
aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to
major repairs, dry-dockings or special or intermediate surveys.
The shipping industry uses available days to measure the number
of ownership days in a period during which vessels should be
capable of generating revenues. |
|
|
(5) |
|
Operating days are the number of available days less the
aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to any
reason, including unforeseen circumstances. The shipping industry
uses operating days to measure the aggregate number of days in a
period during which vessels could actually generate revenues. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
We calculate fleet utilization by dividing the number of our
fleets operating days during a period by the number of available
days during the period. The shipping industry uses fleet
utilization to measure a companys efficiency in properly
operating its vessels and minimizing the amount of days that its
vessels are off-hire for any unforeseen reasons. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Time charter equivalent, or TCE, is a non-GAAP measure of the
average daily revenue performance of a vessel on a per voyage
basis. Our method of calculating TCE is consistent with industry
standards and is determined by dividing operating revenues (net
of voyage expenses and commissions) by operating days for the
relevant period. Voyage expenses primarily consist of port, canal
and fuel costs that are unique to a particular voyage, which
would otherwise be paid by the charter under a time charter
contract. TCE is a standard shipping industry performance measure
used primarily to compare period-to-period changes in a shipping
companys performance despite changes in the mix of charter types
(i.e. spot charters, time charters and bareboat charters) under
which the vessels may employed between the periods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
57,650 |
|
|
$ |
57,533 |
|
|
$ |
66,689 |
|
|
$ |
20,147 |
|
|
$ |
11,727 |
|
Voyage expenses and commissions |
|
|
(5,244 |
) |
|
|
(4,483 |
) |
|
|
(3,910 |
) |
|
|
(1,362 |
) |
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
Net operating revenues |
|
|
52,406 |
|
|
|
53,050 |
|
|
|
62,779 |
|
|
|
18,785 |
|
|
|
10,239 |
|
Operating days |
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter equivalent
daily rate |
|
$ |
15,742 |
|
|
$ |
16,105 |
|
|
$ |
25,719 |
|
|
$ |
17,925 |
|
|
$ |
10,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Average daily vessel operating expenses, which includes crew
costs, provisions, deck and engine stores, lubricating oil,
insurance, maintenance and repairs, is calculated by dividing
vessel operating expenses by ownership days for the relevant time
periods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
$ |
18,607 |
|
|
$ |
17,813 |
|
|
$ |
16,354 |
|
|
$ |
6,001 |
|
|
$ |
4,483 |
|
Ownership days |
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
3,414 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily vessel operating expenses |
|
$ |
5,282 |
|
|
$ |
5,218 |
|
|
$ |
6,084 |
|
|
$ |
4,976 |
|
|
$ |
4,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Daily management fees are calculated by dividing total management
fees paid on ships owned by ownership days for the relevant time
period. |
|
|
(10) |
|
Average daily general and administrative expenses are calculated
by dividing general and administrative expenses (excluding
stock-based compensation expense) by ownership days for the
relevant period. |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Total vessel operating expenses, or TVOE, is a measurement of our
total expenses associated with operating our vessels. TVOE is the
sum of vessel operating expense and management fees. Daily TVOE
is calculated by dividing TVOE by fleet ownership days for the
relevant time period. |
|
10
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider
carefully all of the material risks described below, together with the other information contained
in this prospectus before making a decision to invest in our common stock.
Risk Factors Relating to the Drybulk Shipping Industry
The international drybulk shipping industry is cyclical and volatile and charter rates have
decreased significantly and may further decrease in the future, which may adversely affect our
earnings, vessel values and results of operations.
The drybulk shipping industry is cyclical with volatility in charter hire rates and
profitability. The degree of charter hire rate volatility among different types of drybulk vessels
has varied widely. Since the middle of the third quarter of 2008, charter hire rates for drybulk
vessels have decreased substantially, and although charter rates have recovered from their lows,
they may remain volatile for the foreseeable future and could continue to decline further.
Additionally, charter rates have been particularly volatile in the first quarter of 2011 and have
substantially decreased. As a result, our charter rates could decline significantly, resulting in
a loss and a reduction in earnings.
We anticipate that the future demand for our drybulk vessels will be dependent upon existing
conditions in the worlds economies, seasonal and regional changes in demand, changes in the number
of drybulk vessels being ordered and constructed, particularly if there is an oversupply of
vessels, changes in the capacity of the global drybulk fleet and the sources and supply of drybulk
cargo to be transported by sea. Adverse economic, political, social or other developments could
have a further material adverse effect on drybulk shipping in general and on our business and
operating results in particular.
Our ability to re-charter our drybulk vessels upon the expiration or termination of their
current time charters, the charter rates payable under any renewal or replacement charters will
depend upon, among other things, the current state of the drybulk shipping market. If the drybulk
shipping market is in a period of depression when our vessels charters expire, it is likely that
we may be forced to re-charter them at reduced rates, including rates whereby we incur a loss,
which may reduce our earnings or make our earnings volatile.
In addition, because the market value of our vessels may fluctuate significantly, we may incur
losses when we sell vessels, which may adversely affect our earnings. If we sell vessels at a time
when vessel prices have fallen and before we have recorded an impairment adjustment to our
financial statements, the sale may be at less than the vessels carrying amount on our financial
statements, resulting in a loss and a reduction in earnings.
While the drybulk carrier charter market has recently strengthened, it remains significantly
below its high in the middle of 2008 and the average rates achieved in the three prior years, which
has and may continue to adversely affect our revenues, earnings and profitability and our ability
to comply with our loan covenants.
The revenues, earnings and profitability of companies in our industry are affected by the
charter rates that can be obtained in the market, which is volatile and has experienced significant
declines since its highs in the middle of 2008. For example, the Baltic Drybulk Index, or BDI, an
index published by The Baltic Exchange of shipping rates for 20 key drybulk routes, declined from a
high of 11,793 in May 2008 to a low of 663 in December 2008, which represents a decline of 94%
within a single calendar year. The BDI fell over 70% during October 2008 alone. During 2009, the
BDI remained volatile, reaching a low of 772 on January 5, 2009 and a high of 4,661 on November 19,
2009. During 2010, the BDI was also volatile, declining from a high of 4,209 on May 26, 2010 to a
low of 1,700 on July 15, 2010. Additionally, charter rates have been particularly volatile in the
first quarter of 2011. On March 28, 2011, the BDI was 1,585, increasing from a low of 1,043 on
February 4, 2011. The decline and volatility in charter rates has been due to various factors,
including the devastation caused by the floods in Australia which led to the closure of major ports
and mineral extraction facilities, the temporarily reduction in the demand of commodities by China,
the increase in newbuilding deliveries, political and governmental instability and rising oil
prices. Consequently, the freight rates achieved by drybulk companies have declined sharply,
reducing profitability and, at times, failing to cover the costs of operating vessels. The decline
and volatility in charter rates in the drybulk market also affects the value of our drybulk
vessels, which follows the trends of drybulk charter rates, and earnings
11
on our charters, and similarly affects our cash flows, liquidity and our ability to comply with the
covenants contained in our loan agreements.
Economic recession and disruptions in world financial markets and the resulting governmental
action in the United States and in other parts of the world could have a further material adverse
impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We face risks resulting from changes in economic environments, changes in interest rates and
instability in the banking, energy, commodities and securities markets around the world, among
other factors. Major market disruptions, the adverse changes in market conditions and the
regulatory climate in the United States and worldwide may adversely affect our business, impair our
ability to borrow amounts under our existing credit facility or any credit facilities we enter
into. In addition, the economic environment in Greece, which is where our operations are based, may
have adverse impacts on us. We cannot predict how long the current market conditions will last.
However, these economic and governmental factors, together with the concurrent decline in charter
rates, could have a significant effect on our results of operations and could affect the price of
our common stock.
The earthquake and resulting tsunami and nuclear power plant crisis that struck Japan in March
2011 could, in the near term, result in reduced drybulk trade and demand in Japan, which could
reduce the number of charters to and from Japan and global charter rates and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In March 2011, a severe earthquake struck the northeast portion of Japan. The earthquake
created a severe tsunami, the effects of which were felt in Japan, other countries along the
eastern cost of Asia and across the Pacific Ocean in the Hawaiian Islands, Alaska, Canada, the
western coast of the United States, Mexico and Central and South America. In addition, the
earthquake and resulting tsunami have caused several nuclear power plants located in Japan to fail,
emit radiation and possibly result in meltdowns that could have catastrophic effects. The full
effect of these disasters, both on the Japanese and global economies and the environment, is not
currently known, and may not be known for a significant period of time. These disasters will
likely result in fewer drybulk charters to and from Japan, in both the short and intermediate
terms, including charters for our vessels, and could reduce charter rates globally both in the
short and longer terms. In addition, there can be no assurances that our vessels trading in the
Pacific may not be impacted by the possible effects of spreading radiation. These disasters and the
resulting economic instability, both in the region and globally, could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
While there are certain signs that the global economy is improving, there is still
considerable instability in the world economy, which could initiate a new economic downturn or
introduce volatility in the global markets. A global economic downturn, or volatility in the global
markets, especially in the Asian region, could reduce drybulk trade and demand, which could reduce
charter rates and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Negative trends in the global economy that emerged in 2008 have continued through the first
quarter of 2011. A deterioration in the global economy may cause a decrease in worldwide demand for
certain goods and, thus, dry-bulk shipping. Continuing economic instability could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We expect that a significant number of the port calls made by our vessels will involve the
loading or discharging of raw materials in ports in the Asian and Pacific region, particularly
China and Japan. A negative change in economic conditions in any Asian country, particularly China,
Japan and, to some extent, India, can have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
position and results of operations, as well as our future prospects, by reducing demand and, as a
result, charter rates and affecting our ability to charter our vessels. In past years, China and
India have had two of the worlds fastest growing economies in terms of gross domestic product and
have been the main driving force behind increases in marine drybulk trade and the demand for
drybulk vessels. If economic growth declines in China, Japan, India and other countries in the
Asia-Pacific region, we may face decreases in such drybulk trade and demand. Moreover, the current
economic slowdown in the economies of the United States, the European Union and Asian countries may
further adversely affect economic growth in China, India and elsewhere. Our business, financial
position, results of operations, ability to pay dividends as well as our
12
future prospects, would be materially and adversely affected by a long-lasting or significant
economic downturn in any of these countries.
Changes in the economic and political environment in China and policies adopted by the
government to regulate its economy may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The Chinese economy differs from the economies of most countries belonging to the Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD, in such respects as structure, government
involvement, level of development, growth rate, capital reinvestment, allocation of resources, rate
of inflation and balance of payments position. Prior to 1978, the Chinese economy was a planned
economy. Since 1978, increasing emphasis has been placed on the utilization of market forces in the
development of the Chinese economy. There is an increasing level of freedom and autonomy in areas
such as allocation of resources, production, pricing and management and a gradual shift in emphasis
to a market economy and enterprise reform. Although limited price reforms were undertaken, with
the result that prices for certain commodities are principally determined by market forces, many of
the reforms are experimental and may be subject to change or abolition. We cannot assure you that
the Chinese government will continue to pursue a policy of economic reform. The level of imports to
and exports from China could be adversely affected by changes to these economic reforms, as well as
by changes in political, economic and social conditions or other relevant policies of the Chinese
government, such as changes in laws, regulations or export and import restrictions, all of which
could, adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Risks involved with operating ocean-going vessels could affect our business and reputation,
which may reduce our revenues.
The operation of an ocean-going vessel has inherent risks. These risks include the possibility
of:
|
|
|
crew strikes and/or boycotts; |
|
|
|
|
marine disaster; |
|
|
|
|
piracy; |
|
|
|
|
environmental accidents; |
|
|
|
|
cargo and property losses or damage; and |
|
|
|
|
business interruptions caused by mechanical failure, human error, war,
terrorism, political action in various countries, labor strikes or adverse weather
conditions. |
The involvement of any of our vessels in an environmental disaster may harm our reputation as
a safe and reliable vessel operator. Any of these circumstances or events could increase our costs
or lower our revenues.
Our vessels are exposed to operational risks, including terrorism and piracy, that may not be
adequately covered by our insurance.
The operation of any vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, collision, fire,
contact with floating objects, cargo or property loss or damage and business interruption due to
political circumstances in foreign countries, piracy, terrorist attacks, armed hostilities and
labor strikes. With a drybulk carrier, the cargo itself and its interaction with the ship can be a
risk factor. By their nature, drybulk cargoes are often heavy, dense, easily shifted, and react
badly to water exposure. In addition, drybulk carriers are often subjected to battering treatment
during unloading operations with grabs, jackhammers (to pry encrusted cargoes out of the hold), and
small bulldozers. This treatment may cause damage to the vessel. Vessels damaged due to treatment
during unloading procedures may be more susceptible to breach to the sea. Hull breaches in drybulk
carriers may lead to the flooding of the vessels holds. If a drybulk carrier suffers flooding in
its forward holds, the bulk cargo may become so dense and waterlogged that its pressure may buckle
the vessels bulkheads leading to the loss of a vessel. If we are unable to adequately maintain our
vessels we may be unable to prevent these events. Any of these circumstances or events could
negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
13
Further, such occurrences could result in death or injury to persons, loss of property or
environmental damage, delays in the delivery of cargo, loss of revenues from or termination of
charter contracts, governmental fines, penalties or restrictions on conducting business, higher
insurance rates and damage to our reputation and customer relationships generally. In the past,
political conflicts have also resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways and other efforts
to disrupt international shipping, particularly in the Arabian Gulf region. Acts of terrorism and
piracy have also affected vessels trading in regions such as the South China Sea and the Gulf of
Aden and Indian Ocean off the coast of Somalia and Kenya. If these attacks and other disruptions
result in areas where our vessels are deployed being characterized by insurers as war risk zones
or Joint War Committee war, strikes, terrorism and related perils listed areas, as the Gulf of
Aden currently is, premiums payable for such coverage could increase significantly and such
insurance coverage may be more difficult or impossible to obtain. In addition, there is always the
possibility of a marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental damage. Although our
vessels carry a relatively small amount of the oil used for fuel (bunkers), a spill of oil from
one of our vessels or losses as a result of fire or explosion could be catastrophic under certain
circumstances.
We may not be adequately insured against all risks, and our insurers may not pay particular
claims. With respect to war risks insurance, which we usually obtain for certain of our vessels
making port calls in designated war zone areas, such insurance may not be obtained prior to one of
our vessels entering into an actual war zone, which could result in that vessel not being insured.
Even if our insurance coverage is adequate to cover our losses, we may not be able to timely obtain
a replacement vessel in the event of a loss. Under the terms of our credit facilities, we will be
subject to restrictions on the use of any proceeds we may receive from claims under our insurance
policies. Furthermore, in the future, we may not be able to maintain or obtain adequate insurance
coverage at reasonable rates for our fleet. We may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in
amounts based not only on our own claim records but also the claim records of all other members of
the protection and indemnity associations through which we receive indemnity insurance coverage for
tort liability. Our insurance policies also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions which,
although we believe are standard in the shipping industry, may nevertheless increase our costs in
the event of a claim or decrease any recovery in the event of a loss. If the damages from a
catastrophic oil spill or other marine disaster exceeded our insurance coverage, the payment of
those damages could have a material adverse effect on our business and could possibly result in our
insolvency.
In addition, we may not carry loss of hire insurance. Loss of hire insurance covers the loss
of revenue during extended vessel off-hire periods, such as those that occur during an unscheduled
drydocking due to damage to the vessel from accidents. Accordingly, any loss of a vessel or any
extended period of vessel off-hire, due to an accident or otherwise, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
An oversupply of drybulk vessel capacity may lead to reductions in charter rates and
profitability.
The market supply of drybulk vessels has been increasing, and the number of drybulk vessels on
order is near historic highs. As of December 31, 2010, newbuilding orders had been placed for an
aggregate of approximately 47% of the then-existing global drybulk fleet, with deliveries expected
mainly during the succeeding 36 months, although available data with regard to cancellations of
existing newbuilding orders or delays of new build deliveries are not always accurate. As of
December 31, 2009, newbuilding orders had been placed for an aggregate of approximately 61% of the
then-existing global drybulk fleet, with deliveries expected mainly during the succeeding 36
months, although available data with regard to cancellations of existing new build orders or delays
of new build deliveries are not always accurate. There have been noticeably fewer vessels scrapped
during 2010 than during the height of the economic crisis because of the increased prevailing
charter during the second half of 2009 and first half of 2010. As a result, the available supply of
drybulk vessels may exceed the expected demand for ton mile transportation, even if the latter
continues to grow as per the underlying trend. We mainly operate our fleet in the spot market,
where charter rates are more volatile and revenues are, therefore, less predictable. Therefore we
will be exposed to the volatility of the charter rates with respect to our fleet depending on the
ultimate growth of the global drybulk fleet and its demand. We may be exposed to a prolonged period
of adjustment of the supply and demand in the sector.
14
The international drybulk shipping industry is highly competitive, and we may not be able to
compete successfully for charters with new entrants or established companies with greater
resources.
We employ our vessels in a highly competitive market that is capital intensive and highly
fragmented. Competition arises primarily from other vessel owners, some of which have substantially
greater resources than we do. Competition for the transportation of drybulk cargo by sea is intense
and depends on price, customer relationships, operating expertise, professional reputation and
size, age, location and condition of the vessel. Due in part to the highly fragmented market,
additional competitors with greater resources could enter the drybulk shipping industry and operate
larger fleets through consolidations or acquisitions and may be able to offer lower charter rates
than we are able to offer, which could have a material adverse effect on our fleet utilization and,
accordingly, our profitability.
Rising crew costs may adversely affect our profits.
Crew costs are a significant expense for us under our charters. Recently, the limited supply
of and increased demand for well-qualified crew, due to the increase in the size of the global
shipping fleet, has created upward pressure on crewing costs, which we generally bear under our
period time and spot charters. Increases in crew costs may adversely affect our profitability.
Charter rates are subject to seasonal fluctuations, which may adversely affect our operating
results.
Our fleet consists of Handysize and Handymax drybulk carriers that operate in markets that
have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, in charter rates. This
seasonality may result in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our operating results. The energy
markets primarily affect the demand for coal, with increases during hot summer periods when air
conditioning and refrigeration require more electricity and towards the end of the calendar year in
anticipation of the forthcoming winter period. Grain shipments are driven by the harvest within a
climate zone. Because three of the five largest grain producers (the United States, Canada and the
European Union) are located in the northern hemisphere and the other two (Argentina and Australia)
are located in the southern hemisphere, harvests occur throughout the year and grains require
drybulk shipping accordingly. As a result of these and other factors, the drybulk shipping industry
is typically stronger in the fall and winter months. Therefore, we expect our revenues from our
drybulk carriers to be typically weaker during the fiscal quarters ending June 30 and September 30
and, conversely, we expect our revenues from our drybulk carriers to be typically stronger in
fiscal quarters ending December 31 and March 31. Seasonality in the drybulk industry could
materially affect our operating results.
We are subject to regulation and liability under environmental laws and the failure to comply
with these regulations may subject us to increased liability, may adversely affect our insurance
coverage and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. This could
require significant expenditures and reduce our cash flows and net income.
Our business and the operation of our vessels are materially affected by government regulation
in the form of international conventions and national, state and local laws and regulations in
force in the jurisdictions in which the vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of
their registration, including those governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances
and wastes, the cleanup of oil spills and other contamination, air emissions, and water discharges
and ballast water management. We are also required by various governmental and quasi-governmental
agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses and certificates with respect to our operations.
Because such conventions, laws, regulations and permit requirements are often revised, or the
required additional measures for compliance are still under development, we cannot predict the
ultimate cost of complying with such conventions, laws, regulations or permit requirements, or the
impact thereof on the resale prices or useful lives of our vessels. Additional conventions, laws
and regulations may be adopted which could limit our ability to do business or increase the cost of
our doing business and which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Environmental requirements can also affect the resale prices or useful lives of our vessels or
require reductions in cargo capacity, ship modifications or operational changes or restrictions.
Failure to comply with these requirements could lead to decreased availability of or more costly
insurance coverage for environmental matters or result in the denial of access to certain
jurisdictional waters or ports, or detention in certain ports. Under local,
15
national and foreign laws, as well as international treaties and conventions, we could incur
material liabilities, including cleanup obligations and claims for natural resource, personal
injury and property damages in the event that there is a release of petroleum or other hazardous
materials from our vessels or otherwise in connection with our operations. The 2010 explosion of
the Deepwater Horizon and the subsequent release of oil into the Gulf of Mexico or similar events
may result in further regulation of the shipping industry, including modifications to statutory
liability schemes. Violations of, or liabilities under, environmental regulations can result in
substantial penalties, fines and other sanctions, including, in certain instances, seizure or
detention of our vessels. Events of this nature could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
The operation of our vessels is affected by the requirements set forth in the International
Safety Management, or ISM Code. The ISM Code requires shipowners and bareboat charterers to develop
and maintain an extensive Safety Management System. The system includes the adoption of a safety
and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for safe operation
and dealing with emergencies. The failure of a shipowner or bareboat charterer to comply with the
ISM Code may subject such party to increased liability, may decrease available insurance coverage
for the affected vessels, and/or may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain
ports.
The European Union is currently considering proposals to further regulate vessel operations.
Individual countries in the European Union may also have additional environmental and safety
requirements. It is difficult to predict what legislation or regulation, if any, may be adopted by
the European Union or any other country or authority.
The International Maritime Organization, or IMO, or other regulatory bodies may adopt
additional regulations in the future that could adversely affect the useful lives of our vessels as
well as our ability to generate income from them. These requirements could also affect the resale
value of our vessels.
The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, established an extensive regulatory and
liability regime for the protection and clean-up of the environment from oil spills. OPA affects
all owners and operators whose vessels trade in the United States of America or any of its
territories and possessions or whose vessels operate in waters of the United States of America,
which includes the territorial sea of the United States of America and its 200 nautical mile
exclusive economic zone.
Under OPA, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are responsible parties and are
jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the spill results solely from the act or omission of
a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs and other
damages arising from discharges or threatened discharges of oil from their vessels, including
bunkers (fuel).
Increased inspection procedures and tighter import and export controls could increase costs
and disrupt our business.
International shipping is subject to various security and customs inspection and related
procedures in countries of origin and destination. Inspection procedures can result in the seizure
of the contents of our vessels, delays in the loading, offloading or delivery and the levying of
customs duties, fines or other penalties against us.
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives
intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, the U.S. Maritime Transportation
Security Act of 2002, or the MTSA, came into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in
July 2003, the U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security
requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at
Sea, or SOLAS, created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security.
The new chapter became effective in July 2004 and imposes various detailed security obligations on
vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the newly created International Ship
and Port Facilities Security Code, or the ISPS Code. The ISPS Code is designed to protect ports and
international shipping against terrorism. After July 1, 2004, to trade internationally, a vessel
must attain an International Ship Security Certificate from a recognized security organization
approved by the vessels flag state. For a further description of the various requirements, please
see BusinessEnvironmental and Other RegulationVessel Security Regulations.
16
The United States Coast Guard (USCG) has developed the Electronic Notice of Arrival/Departure
(e-NOA/D) application to provide the means of fulfilling the arrival and departure notification
requirements of the USCG and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) online. Prior to September 11,
2001, ships or their agents notified the Marine Safety Office (MSO)/Captain Of The Port (COTP)
zone, within 24 hours of the vessels arrival via telephone, facsimile (fax), or electronic mail
(e-mail). Due to the events of September 11, 2001, the USCGs National Vessel Movement Center
(NVMC)/Ship Arrival Notification System (SANS) was set up as part of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) initiative. Also, as a result of this initiative, the advanced notice time
requirement changed from 24 hours notice to 96 hours notice (or 24 hours notice, depending upon
normal transit time). The NOAs and/or NODs continue to be submitted via telephone, fax, or e-mail,
but are now to be submitted to the NVMC, where watch personnel entered the information into a
central USCG database. Additionally, the National Security Agency has identified certain countries
known for high terrorist activities and if a vessel has either called some of these identified
countries in its previous ports and/or the members of the crew are from any of these identified
countries, more stringent security requirements must be met.
On June 6, 2005, the Advanced Passenger Information System (APIS) Final Rule became effective
(19CFR 4.7b and 4.64). Pursuant to these regulations, a commercial carrier arriving into or
departing from the United States is required to electronically transmit an APIS manifest to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through an approved electronic interchange and programming
format. All international commercial carriers transporting passengers and /or crewmembers must
obtain an international carrier bond and place it on file with the CBP prior to entry or departure
from the United States. The minimum bond amount is $50,000.
It is possible that changes to inspection procedures could impose additional financial and
legal obligations on us. Furthermore, changes to inspection procedures could also impose additional
costs and obligations on our customers and may, in certain cases, render the shipment of certain
types of cargo uneconomical or impractical. Any such changes or developments may have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability
to pay dividends.
If any of our vessels fail to maintain their class certification and/or fail any annual
survey, intermediate survey, dry-docking or special survey, that vessel would be unable to carry
cargo, thereby reducing our revenues and profitability and violating certain loan covenants of our
third-party indebtedness.
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society
authorized by its country of registry. The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe
and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of
the vessel and the Safety of Life at Sea Convention, or SOLAS.
A vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys, dry-dockings and special surveys.
In lieu of a special survey, a vessels machinery may be on a continuous survey cycle, under which
the machinery would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. Our vessels are on special
survey cycles for hull inspection and continuous survey cycles for machinery inspection. Every
vessel is also required to be dry-docked every two to three years for inspection of the underwater
parts of such vessel.
If any vessel does not maintain its class and/or fails any annual survey, intermediate survey,
dry-docking or special survey, the vessel will be unable to carry cargo between ports and will be
unemployable and uninsurable, thereby reducing our revenues and profitability. That could also
cause us to be in violation of certain covenants in our loan agreements. In addition, the cost of
maintaining our vessels classifications may be substantial at times and could result in reduced
revenues.
The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto our vessels may lead to governmental claims
against us.
We expect that our vessels will call in ports in South America and other areas where smugglers
are known to attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on vessels, with or without the knowledge
of crew members. To the extent our vessels are found with contraband, whether inside or attached to
the hull of our vessel and whether with or without the knowledge of any of our crew, we may face
governmental or other regulatory claims which could have an adverse effect on our business, results
of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
17
Maritime claimants could arrest our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flow.
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo and other parties
may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In
many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by arresting a vessel through
foreclosure proceedings. The arresting or attachment of one or more of our vessels could interrupt
our cash flow and require us to pay large sums of funds to have the arrest lifted.
In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the sister ship theory of
liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel which is subject to the claimants maritime lien
and any associated vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner or managed
by the same manager. Claimants could try to assert sister ship liability against one of our
vessels for claims relating to another of our vessels or a vessel managed by our manager.
Governments could requisition our vessels during a period of war or emergency, resulting in
loss of earnings.
A government could requisition for title or seize our vessels. Requisition for title occurs
when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes the owner. A government could also
requisition our vessels for hire, which occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and
effectively becomes the charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during a
period of war or emergency. Government requisition of one or more of our vessels could reduce our
revenues and net income.
Our vessels may suffer damage and we may face unexpected dry-docking costs, which could affect
our cash flow and financial condition.
If our vessels suffer damage, they may need to be repaired at a dry-docking facility,
resulting in vessel downtime and vessel off-hire. The costs of dry-dock repairs are unpredictable
and can be substantial. We may have to pay dry-docking costs that our insurance does not cover. The
inactivity of these vessels while they are being repaired and repositioned, as well as the actual
cost of these repairs, would decrease our earnings. In addition, space at dry-docking facilities is
sometimes limited and not all dry-docking facilities are conveniently located. We may be unable to
find space at a suitable dry-docking facility or we may be forced to move to a dry-docking facility
that is not conveniently located to our vessels positions. The loss of earnings while our vessels
are forced to wait for space or to relocate to dry-docking facilities that are farther away from
the routes on which our vessels trade would also decrease our earnings.
Rising fuel prices may adversely affect our profits.
Upon redelivery of vessels at the end of a period time or trip time charter, we may be
obligated to repurchase bunkers on board at prevailing market prices, which could be materially
higher than fuel prices at the inception of the charter period. In addition, although we rarely
deploy our vessels on voyage charters, fuel is a significant, if not the largest, expense that we
would incur with respect to vessels operating on voyage charter. As a result, an increase in the
price of fuel may adversely affect our profitability. The price and supply of fuel is volatile and
fluctuates based on events outside our control, including geopolitical developments, supply and
demand for oil and gas, actions by OPEC and other oil and gas producers, war and unrest in oil
producing countries and regions, regional production patterns and environmental concerns and
regulations.
Risk Factors Relating to FreeSeas
Our operations expose us to global political risks, such as wars and political instability,
that may interfere with the operation of our vessels causing a decrease in revenues from such
vessels.
We are an international company and primarily conduct our operations outside the United
States. Changing economic, political and governmental conditions in the countries where we are
engaged in business or where our vessels are registered will affect us. In the past, political
conflicts, particularly in the Middle East, resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways and
other efforts to disrupt shipping in the area. For example, recent political and governmental
instability in Egypt and Libya may affect vessels trading in such regions. In addition, future
political
18
and governmental instability, revolutions and wars in regions where our vessels trade could
affect our trade patterns and adversely affect our operations by causing delays in shipping on
certain routes or making shipping impossible on such routes, thereby causing a decrease in
revenues.
We intend to continue to charter all of our vessels in the spot market, and as a result, we
will be exposed to the cyclicality and volatility of the spot charter market.
Since we intend to continue to charter all of our vessels in the spot market, we will be
exposed to the cyclicality and volatility of the spot charter market, and we may not have long
term, fixed time charter rates to mitigate the adverse effects of downturns in the spot market.
Handysize and handymax vessels, which we currently operate, have been less volatile compared to
larger vessels such as panamax and capesize vessels but this may discontinue in the future. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully charter our vessels in the future at rates
sufficient to allow us to meet our obligations. The supply of and demand for shipping capacity
strongly influences freight rates. Because the factors affecting the supply and demand for vessels
are outside of our control and are unpredictable, the nature, timing, direction and degree of
changes in industry conditions are also unpredictable.
Factors that influence demand for drybulk vessel capacity include:
|
|
|
demand for and production of drybulk products; |
|
|
|
|
global and regional economic and political conditions including developments in
international trade, fluctuations in industrial and agricultural production and armed
conflicts; |
|
|
|
|
|
the distance drybulk cargo is to be moved by sea; |
|
|
|
|
|
environmental and other regulatory developments; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns. |
The factors that influence the supply of drybulk vessel capacity include:
|
|
|
the number of newbuilding deliveries; |
|
|
|
|
port and canal congestion; |
|
|
|
|
the scrapping rate of older vessels; |
|
|
|
|
vessel casualties; and |
|
|
|
|
the number of vessels that are out of service, i.e., laid-up, drydocked,
awaiting repairs or otherwise not available for hire. |
In addition to the prevailing and anticipated freight rates, factors that affect the rate of
newbuilding, scrapping and laying-up include newbuilding prices, secondhand vessel values in
relation to scrap prices, costs of bunkers and other operating costs, costs associated with
classification society surveys, normal maintenance and insurance coverage, the efficiency and age
profile of the existing fleet in the market and government and industry regulation of maritime
transportation practices, particularly environmental protection laws and regulations. These factors
influencing the supply of and demand for shipping capacity are outside of our control, and we may
not be able to correctly assess the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions.
We anticipate that the future demand for our drybulk carriers will be dependent upon economic
growth in the worlds economies, including China and India, seasonal and regional changes in
demand, changes in the capacity of the global drybulk carrier fleet and the sources and supply of
drybulk cargo to be transported by sea. The capacity of the global drybulk carrier fleet seems
likely to increase, and we can provide no assurance as to the timing or extent of future economic
growth. Adverse economic, political, social or other developments could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Should the
drybulk market
19
strengthen significantly in the future, we may enter into medium to long term employment
contracts for some or all of our vessels.
When our charters end, we may not be able to replace them promptly, and any replacement
charters could be at lower charter rates, which may materially adversely affect our earnings and
results of operations.
We will generally attempt to recharter our vessels at favorable rates with reputable
charterers. All of our vessels currently operate in the spot market. If the drybulk shipping market
is in a period of depression when our vessels charters expire, it is likely that we may be forced
to re-charter them at reduced rates, if such charters are available at all. We cannot assure you
that we will be able to obtain new charters at comparable or higher rates or with comparable
charterers, or that we will be able to obtain new charters at all. The charterers under our
charters have no obligation to renew or extend the charters. We will generally attempt to recharter
our vessels at favorable rates with reputable charterers as our charters expire. Failure to obtain
replacement charters at rates comparable to our existing charters will reduce or eliminate our
revenue, will adversely affect our ability to service our debt, and will delay our ability to pay
dividends to shareholders. Further, we may have to reposition our vessels without cargo or
compensation to deliver them to future charterers or to move vessels to areas where we believe that
future employment may be more likely or advantageous. Repositioning our vessels would increase our
vessel operating costs. If any of the foregoing events were to occur, our revenues, net income and
earnings may be materially adversely affected.
If we do not successfully employ our vessels our revenues, cash flows and profitability, and
our ability to comply with certain of our loan covenants, would be adversely affected.
We currently employ all of our vessels in the spot market, all with charters scheduled to
expire within one to three months, by which time we will have to negotiate new employment for these
vessels. If the rates in the charter market fall significantly for the rest of 2011 and into 2012,
it will affect the charter revenue we will receive from these vessels, which would have an adverse
effect on our revenues, cash flows and profitability, as well as our ability to comply with our
debt covenants.
Our growth depends on the growth in demand for and the shipping of drybulk cargoes.
Our growth strategy focuses on the drybulk shipping sector. Accordingly, our growth depends on
growth in world and regional demand for and the shipping of drybulk cargoes, which could be
negatively affected by a number of factors, such as declines in prices for drybulk cargoes or
general political and economic conditions.
Reduced demand for and the shipping of drybulk cargoes would have a material adverse effect on
our future growth and could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. In
particular, Asian Pacific economies and India have been the main driving force behind the past
increase in seaborne drybulk trade and the demand for drybulk carriers. The negative change in
economic conditions in any Asian Pacific country, but particularly in China or Japan, as well as
India, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations, as well as our future prospects, by further reducing demand and resultant charter
rates.
We depend upon a few significant customers for a large part of our revenues. The loss of one
or more of these customers could adversely affect our financial performance.
We have historically derived a significant part of our revenue from a small number of
charterers. During 2010, we derived approximately 42% of our gross revenue from three charterers,
during 2009, we derived approximately 55% of our gross revenues from two charterers, and during
2008, we derived approximately 61% of our gross revenues from three charterers. In 2011, we
anticipate a significant reduction in our dependency on a small number of charters, as we shift our
chartering strategy more fully to the spot charter market.
However, if we do remain dependent, in large part, on a small number of charterers, if one or
more of our charterers is unable to perform under one or more charters with us, or if we are not
able to find appropriate replacement charterers, or if a charterer exercises certain rights to
terminate its charter, we could suffer a loss of revenues that could materially adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
20
We lose a charterer or the benefits of a charter if a charterer fails to make charter
payments because of its financial inability, disagreements with us or otherwise, terminates the
charter because we fail to deliver the vessel within the time specified in the charter, the vessel
is lost or damaged beyond repair, there are serious deficiencies in the vessel or prolonged periods
of off-hire, default under the charter or the vessel has been subject to seizure for more than a
specified number of days.
Our charterers may terminate or default on their charters, which could adversely affect our
results of operations and cash flow.
The ability of each of our charterers to perform its obligations under a charter will depend
on a number of factors that are beyond our control. These factors may include general economic
conditions, the condition of the drybulk shipping industry, the charter rates received for specific
types of vessels, hedging arrangements, the ability of charterers to obtain letters of credit from
its customers, cash reserves, cash flow considerations and various operating expenses. Many of
these factors impact the financial viability of our charterers. There can be no assurance that some
of our charterers would not fail to pay charter hire or attempt to renegotiate charter rates.
Should a charterer fail to honor its obligations under its agreement with us, it may be difficult
for us to secure substitute employment for the affected vessel, and any new charter arrangements we
secure in the spot market or on a time charter may be at lower rates.
For example, the M/V Free Jupiter was on time charter with Korea Line Corp., or KLC, a South
Korean company, from June 8, 2007 until she was re-delivered to us on February 22, 2011. KLC made
several unilateral deductions from hire payments during the three-year course of the time charter,
and no hire has been received from KLC from February 8, 2011 until the actual redelivery of the
vessel on February 22, 2011. We commenced arbitration proceedings against KLC, and have taken
action to obtain security, including the arrest of KLC assets. As a result, we have obtained
third-party security in the amount of $1,680 (which includes provision for interest and legal
costs) in the form of a letter of undertaking from KLCs P&I club covering KLCs unilateral
deductions from the hire. We have also obtained cash security held in escrow in the amount of $159
from the execution of a lien on sub-hires. On January 25, 2011 KLC announced that it had filed a
petition for the rehabilitation proceeding for court receivership in the Seoul Central District
Court, and the court had issued a preservation order. Although we believe that we have taken
appropriate steps to limit any losses as a result of KLCs actions, there can be no assurances that
we will recover all or any part of the amounts due to us.
If our charterers fail to meet their obligations to us, we would experience material adverse
effects on our revenues, cash flows and profitability and our ability to comply with our debt
covenants and pay our debt service and other obligations.
The performance of our existing charters and the creditworthiness of our charterers may hinder
our ability to implement our business strategy by making additional debt financing unavailable or
available only at higher than anticipated cost.
The actual or perceived credit quality of our charterers, and any defaults by them, may
materially affect our ability to obtain the additional debt financing that we will require to
acquire additional vessels or may significantly increase our costs of obtaining such financing. Our
inability to obtain additional financing at all, or at a higher than anticipated cost, may
materially impair our ability to implement our business strategy.
At December 31, 2010 our current liabilities exceeded our current assets, which could impair
our ability to successfully operate our business and could have material adverse effects on our
revenues, cash flows and profitability and our ability to comply with our debt covenants and pay
our debt service and other obligations.
At December 31, 2010, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets. In addition, and as
further discussed in the section of this prospectus titled Summary of Contractual Obligations,
the expected short term capital commitments to fund the construction installments under the
shipbuilding contracts in 2011 amount to $4,880. Cash expected to be generated from the operations
assuming that market charter hire rates would deteriorate in 2011 may not by itself be sufficient
to cover our ongoing working capital requirements. If we cannot cover our ongoing working capital
requirements, we may not be able to pay our obligations as they become due, we may fall out of
compliance with our loan agreements and as a result we would experience material adverse effects on
our revenues, cash flows and profitability.
21
There may be risks associated with the purchase and operation of secondhand vessels.
Our business strategy may include additional growth through the acquisition of additional
secondhand vessels. Although we inspect secondhand vessels prior to purchase, this does not
normally provide us with the same knowledge about their condition that we would have had if such
vessels had been built for and operated exclusively by us. Therefore, our future operating results
could be negatively affected if some of the vessels do not perform as we expect. Also, we
generally do not receive the benefit of warranties from the builders if the vessels we buy are
older than one year.
The aging of our fleet may result in increased operating costs in the future, which could
adversely affect our ability to operate our vessels profitably.
In general, the costs to maintain a vessel in good operating condition increase with the age
of the vessel. As of December 31, 2010, the average age of the vessels in our current fleet was 14
years. As our vessels age, they may become less fuel efficient and more costly to maintain and will
not be as advanced as more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in design and engine
technology. Rates for cargo insurance, paid by charterers, also increase with the age of a vessel,
making older vessels less desirable to charterers. Governmental regulations, safety or other
equipment standards related to the age of vessels may require expenditures for alterations, or the
addition of new equipment, to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which our
vessels may engage. As our vessels age, market conditions may not justify those expenditures or
enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the remainder of their useful lives.
We may be subject to increased premium payments because we obtain some of our insurance
through protection and indemnity associations.
We may be subject to increased premium payments, or calls, in amounts based not only on our
and our Managers claim records but also the claim records of other members of the protection and
indemnity associations through which we receive insurance coverage for tort liability, including
pollution-related liability. In addition, our protection and indemnity associations may not have
enough resources to cover claims made against them. Our payment of these calls could result in
significant expense to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Delays or defaults by the shipyards in the construction of the two newbuildings that we
currently have on order and any new vessels that we may order in the future could increase our
expenses and diminish our net income and cash flows.
Our business strategy currently includes additional growth through acquiring newbuilding
contracts or constructing new vessels. On August 17, 2010, we entered into two shipbuilding
contracts, with a reputable Chinese shipyard, for the construction of two Handysize drybulk vessels
of approximately 33,600 dwt each, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $48,800
(excluding extra costs of approximately $920). The vessels are scheduled for delivery in the
second and third quarters of 2012. These projects and any additional projects could be subject to
the risk of delay or defaults by shipyards caused by, among other things, unforeseen quality or
engineering problems, work stoppages, weather interference, unanticipated cost increases, delays in
receipt of necessary equipment, and inability to obtain the requisite permits or approvals. In
accordance with industry practice, in the event any such shipyards are unable or unwilling to
deliver the vessels ordered, we may not have substantial remedies. Failure to construct or deliver
vessels by the shipyards or any significant delays could increase our expenses and diminish our net
income and cash flows.
Further declines in charter rates and other market deterioration could cause us to incur
impairment charges.
We evaluate the recoverable amounts of our vessels to determine if events have occurred that
would require an impairment of their carrying amounts. The recoverable amount of vessels is
reviewed based on events and changes in circumstances that would indicate that the carrying amount
of the assets might not be recovered. The review for potential impairment indicators and future
undiscounted net operating cash flows related to the vessels is complex and requires us to make
various estimates including future charter rates and earnings from the vessels which have been
historically volatile.
22
When our estimate of future undiscounted net operating cash flows for any vessel is lower than
the vessels carrying value, the carrying value is written down, by recording a charge to
operations, to the vessels fair market value if the fair market value is lower than the vessels
carrying value. The carrying values of our vessels may not represent their fair market value
because the market prices of secondhand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in charter rates and
the cost of newbuildings. Any impairment charges incurred as a result of declines in charter rates
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition.
The market values of our vessels have declined and may further decrease, and we may incur
losses when we sell vessels or we may be required to write down their carrying value, which may
adversely affect our earnings.
The market values of our vessels will fluctuate depending on general economic and market
conditions affecting the shipping industry and prevailing charter hire rates, competition from
other shipping companies and other modes of transportation, the types, sizes and ages of our
vessels, applicable governmental regulations and the cost of newbuildings.
If a determination is made that a vessels future useful life is limited or its future
earnings capacity is reduced, it could result in an impairment of its carrying amount on our
financial statements that would result in a charge against our earnings and the reduction of our
shareholders equity. If for any reason we sell our vessels at a time when prices have fallen, the
sale price may be less than the vessels carrying amount on our financial statements, and we would
incur a loss and a reduction in earnings.
A decline in the market value of our vessels could lead to a default under our loan agreements
and the loss of our vessels.
We have incurred secured debt under loan agreements for all of our vessels. The market value
of our vessels is based, in part, on charter rates and the stability of charter rates over a period
of time. As a result of global economic conditions, volatility in charter rates, generally
declining charter rates, and other factors, we have recently experienced a decrease in the market
value of our vessels. If charter rates continue to decline and/or the market value of our fleet
declines further, we may not be in compliance with certain covenants of our existing loan
agreements that relate to maintenance of asset values and, as a result, we may not be able to
refinance our debt or obtain additional financing. As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
we were not in full compliance with certain loan covenants but obtained waivers and/or covenant
amendments from each of our lenders. As of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all loan
covenants. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Loan Agreement Covenants. There can be no assurances, however, that charter rates
will stabilize or increase, that the market value of our vessels will stabilize or increase or that
we will remain in compliance with the financial covenants in our loan agreements or that our
lenders will agree to waivers or forbearances.
Our loan agreements contain covenants that may limit our liquidity and corporate activities,
including our ability to pay dividends. If the drybulk market remains depressed or further
declines, we may require further waivers and/or covenant amendments to our loan agreements relating
to our compliance with certain covenants for certain periods of time. The waivers and/or covenant
amendments may impose additional operating and financial restrictions on us and modify the terms of
our existing loan agreements. Any such waivers or amendments, if needed, could contain additional
restrictions and might not be granted at all.
Our loan agreements require that we maintain certain financial and other covenants. The low
drybulk charter rates and drybulk vessel values have previously affected, and may in the future
affect, our ability to comply with these covenants. A violation of these covenants constitutes an
event of default under our credit facilities and would provide our lenders with various remedies,
including the right to require us to post additional collateral, enhance our equity and liquidity,
withhold payment of dividends, increase our interest payments, pay down our indebtedness to a level
where we are in compliance with our loan covenants, sell vessels in our fleet, or reclassify our
indebtedness as current liabilities. Our lenders could also accelerate our indebtedness and
foreclose their liens on our vessels. The exercise of any of these remedies could materially
adversely impair our ability to continue to conduct our business. Moreover, our lenders may require
the payment of additional fees, require prepayment of a portion of our indebtedness to them,
accelerate the amortization schedule for our indebtedness and increase the interest rates they
charge us on our outstanding indebtedness.
23
As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we were not in full compliance with certain of
our loan covenants. During March, July, November and December 2009, our lenders agreed to waive any
breaches and/or modify certain of the financial covenants in our credit agreements. As of December
31, 2010, we were in compliance with all loan covenants. For more information, see Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Long-Term Debt Loan Agreement Covenants. There can be no assurances that we will
remain in compliance with our loan covenants. If conditions in the drybulk charter market remain
depressed or worsen, we may need to request additional waivers or seek further amendments to our
loan agreements. There can be no assurance that our lenders will provide such waivers or
amendments. If we require waivers or amendments and are unable to obtain them, as described above,
we would be in default under our credit facilities and your investment in our common stock could
lose most or all of its value.
As a result of our loan covenants, our lenders have imposed operating and financial
restrictions on us. These restrictions may limit our ability to:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
create liens on our assets; |
|
|
|
|
sell capital stock of our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
make investments; |
|
|
|
|
engage in mergers or acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends; |
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
change the management of our vessels or terminate or materially amend our
management agreements; and |
|
|
|
|
sell our vessels. |
The amended and restated credit agreement dated September 15, 2009 with HBU (now known as
Deutsche Bank Nederland following the acquisition of HBU by Deutsche Bank) does not allow us to pay
dividends without their prior written approval, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. If
we need covenant waivers, our lenders may impose additional restrictions and may require the
payment of additional fees, require prepayment of a portion of our indebtedness to them, accelerate
the amortization schedule for our indebtedness, and increase the interest rates they charge us on
our outstanding indebtedness. We may be required to use a significant portion of the net proceeds
from any future capital raising to repay a portion of our outstanding indebtedness. We have agreed
to pay Deutsche Bank Nederland up to 10% of the net proceeds of any capital raise up to a maximum
of $3.0 million, out of which we have already paid approximately $1.7 million from our July 2009
follow-on offering. As a result, we expect to pay Deutsche Bank Nederland approximately $1.3
million of the net proceeds of this offering. These potential restrictions and requirements may
limit our ability to pay dividends to you, finance our future operations, make acquisitions or
pursue business opportunities.
Servicing debt may limit funds available for other purposes and inability to service debt may
lead to acceleration of debt and foreclosure on our fleet.
To finance our fleet, we incurred secured debt under various loan agreements. As of March 28,
2011, we had outstanding an aggregate of $116,871 in debt. We anticipate that we will increase our
indebtedness by approximately $32,400 when we take delivery of the two newbuilding vessels in the
second and third quarters of 2012. We will be required to dedicate a significant portion of our
cash flow from operations to pay the principal and interest on our debt. These payments will limit
funds otherwise available for working capital, capital expenditures and other purposes. We will
need to incur additional indebtedness as we further renew and expand our fleet, which may increase
our ratio of debt to equity. There can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain such
financing when desired or on terms acceptable to us. Further, the need to service our debt may
limit funds available for other
24
purposes, including distributing cash to our shareholders, and our
inability to service debt could lead to acceleration
of our debt and foreclosure on our fleet. We can provide no assurances that we will be able to
generate cash flow in amounts that are sufficient for these purposes.
If we fail to manage our growth properly, we may not be able to successfully expand our market
share.
We intend to continue to grow our fleet. Our growth will depend on:
|
|
|
locating and acquiring suitable vessels; |
|
|
|
|
placing newbuilding orders and taking delivery of vessels; |
|
|
|
|
identifying and consummating acquisitions or joint ventures; |
|
|
|
|
integrating any acquired vessel successfully with our existing operations; |
|
|
|
|
enhancing our customer base; |
|
|
|
|
managing our expansion; and |
|
|
|
|
obtaining the required financing. |
Growing any business by acquisition presents numerous risks, such as undisclosed liabilities
and obligations and difficulty experienced in obtaining additional qualified personnel, managing
relationships with customers and suppliers, and integrating newly acquired operations into existing
infrastructures.
We cannot give any assurance that we will be successful in executing our growth plans or that
we will not incur significant expenses and losses in connection with the execution of those growth
plans.
Our ability to successfully implement our business plans depends on our ability to obtain
additional financing, which may affect the value of your investment in us.
We will require substantial additional financing to fund the acquisition of additional vessels
and to implement our business plans. We cannot be certain that sufficient financing will be
available on terms that are acceptable to us or at all. If we cannot raise the financing we need in
a timely manner and on acceptable terms, we may not be able to acquire the vessels necessary to
implement our business plans and consequently you may lose some or all of your investment in us.
While we expect that a significant portion of the financing resources needed to acquire
vessels will be through long-term debt financing, we may raise additional funds through additional
equity offerings. New equity investors may dilute the percentage of the ownership interest of our
existing shareholders. Sales or the possibility of sales of substantial amounts of shares of our
common stock in the public markets could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
If we acquire additional dry bulk carriers and those vessels are not delivered on time or are
delivered with significant defects, our earnings and financial condition could suffer.
We expect to acquire additional vessels in the future. A delay in the delivery of any of these
vessels to us or the failure of the contract counterparty to deliver a vessel at all could cause us
to breach our obligations under a related time charter and could adversely affect our earnings, our
financial condition and the amount of dividends, if any, that we pay in the future. The delivery of
these vessels could be delayed or certain events may arise which could result in us not taking
delivery of a vessel, such as a total loss of a vessel, a constructive loss of a vessel, or
substantial damage to a vessel prior to delivery. In addition, the delivery of any of these vessels
with substantial defects could have similar consequences.
We currently rely on our Manager and, to a lesser extent, Safbulk, to manage and charter our
fleet.
25
We currently have no employees and contract all of our financial, accounting, including our
financial reporting and internal controls, and other back-office services, and the management of
our fleet, including crewing,
maintenance and repair, through our Manager. Our Manager has entered into a sub-management
agreement with Safbulk, a company controlled by the Restis family, for the commercial management of
our fleet, including negotiating and obtaining charters, relations with charter brokers and
performance of post-charter activities. We rely on our Manager to provide the technical management
of our fleet, and on Safbulk for our ability to attract charterers and charter brokers. The loss of
either of their services or failure to perform their obligations could reduce our revenues and net
income and adversely affect our operations and business if we are not able to contract with other
companies to provide these services or take over these aspects of our business directly. FreeSeas
has no control over our Manager and Safbulk operations. Our Manager is not liable to us for any
losses or damages, if any, that may result from its management of our fleet unless the same shall
have resulted from willful misconduct or gross negligence of our Manager or any person to whom
performance of the management services has been delegated by our Manager. Pursuant to its agreement
with us, our Manager liability for such acts, except in certain limited circumstances, may not
exceed ten times the annual management fee payable by the applicable subsidiary to our Manager.
Although we may have rights against our Manager, if our Manager defaults on its obligations to us,
we may have no recourse against our Manager. In addition, if Safbulk defaults on its obligations to
our Manager, we may have no recourse against Safbulk. Further, we will need approval from our
lenders if we intend to replace our Manager as our fleet manager.
If our Manager is unable to perform under its vessel management agreements with us, our
results of operations may be adversely affected.
As we expand our fleet, we will rely on our Manager to recruit suitable additional seafarers
and to meet other demands imposed on our Manager. We cannot assure you that our Manager will be
able to meet these demands as we expand our fleet. If our Managers crewing agents encounter
business or financial difficulties, they may not be able to adequately staff our vessels. If our
Manager is unable to provide the commercial and technical management service for our vessels, our
business, results of operations, cash flows and financial position and our ability to pay dividends
may be adversely affected.
We and one of our executive officers have affiliations with our Manager that could create
conflicts of interest detrimental to us.
Our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Ion G. Varouxakis, is also the
controlling shareholder and officer of our Manager, which is our ship management company. These
dual responsibilities of our officer and the relationships between the two companies could create
conflicts of interest between our Manager and us. Each of our operating subsidiaries has a
nonexclusive management agreement with our Manager. Our Manager has subcontracted the charter and
post-charter management of our fleet to Safbulk, which is controlled by FS Holdings Limited, one of
our principal shareholders. Although our Manager currently serves as manager for vessels owned by
us, neither our Manager nor Safbulk is restricted from entering into management agreements with
other competing shipping companies, and Safbulk provides management services to other international
shipping companies, including the Restis Group, which owns and operates vessels in the drybulk
sector. Our Manager or Safbulk could also allocate charter and/or vessel purchase and sale
opportunities to others. There can be no assurance that our Manager or Safbulk would resolve any
conflicts of interest in a manner beneficial to us.
Management and service fees are payable to our Manager, regardless of our profitability, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The management and service fees due from us to our Manager are payable whether or not our
vessels are employed, and regardless of our profitability. We have no ability to require our
Manager to reduce the management fees and service fees if our profitability decreases, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
26
Our Manager is a privately held company, and there is little or no publicly available
information about it. Therefore, an investor could have little advance warning of problems that
affect our manager that could also have a material adverse effect on us.
The ability of our Manager to continue providing services for our benefit will depend in part
on its own financial strength. Circumstances beyond our control could impair our Managers
financial strength. Because our Manager is privately held, it is unlikely that information about
its financial strength would become public or
available to us prior to any default by our Manager under the management agreement. As a
result, an investor in us might have little advance warning of problems that affect our Manager,
even though those problems could have a material adverse effect on us.
Because our seafaring employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, failure of
industry groups to renew those agreements may disrupt our operations and adversely affect our
earnings.
All of the seafarers employed on the vessels in our fleet are covered by collective bargaining
agreements that set basic standards. We cannot assure you that these agreements will prevent labor
interruptions. Any labor interruptions could disrupt our operations and harm our financial
performance.
Increases in interest rates would reduce funds available to purchase vessels and service debt.
We have purchased, and may purchase in the future, vessels with loans that provide for
periodic interest payments based on indices that fluctuate with changes in market interest rates.
If interest rates increase significantly, it would increase our costs of financing our acquisition
of vessels, which could decrease the number of additional vessels that we could acquire and
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and may adversely affect our
ability to service debt.
The derivative contracts we have entered into to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates could result in higher than market interest rates and charges against our income.
We have entered into two interest rate swaps for purposes of managing our exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates applicable to indebtedness under two of our credit facilities, which
provide for a floating interest rate based on LIBOR. Our hedging strategies, however, may not be
effective and we may incur substantial losses if interest rates move materially differently from
the fixed rates agreed to in our derivative contracts. Since our existing interest rate swaps do
not, and future derivative contracts may not, qualify for treatment as hedges for accounting
purposes, we recognize fluctuations in the fair value of such contracts in our income statement. In
addition, our financial condition could be materially adversely affected to the extent we do not
hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuations under our financing arrangements. Any hedging
activities we engage in may not effectively manage our interest rate exposure or have the desired
impact on our financial conditions or results of operations.
Economic conditions and regulatory pressures impacting banks in Greece may cause disruptions
to one of our lenders, which may cause an increase in the cost of our borrowings from that lender.
One of our lenders is the First Business Bank, or FBB, located in Greece. As a result of the
recent financial crisis in Greece, Greek banks have been under significant pressure from the
applicable banking regulators to increase capital, increase earnings or merge with other banks.
There can be no assurances that our banking relationship with FBB would continue if FBB were to
merge with another bank or that FBB might not attempt to invoke provisions in our loan agreement
that permits it to pass along increases in its cost of regulations. In either event, our financial
condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
We are a holding company, and we will depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute
funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations or to make dividend payments.
We are a holding company and our subsidiaries, which are all wholly owned by us, conduct all
of our operations and own all of our operating assets. We have no significant assets other than the
equity interests in our wholly owned subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to make dividend
payments depends on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. We and our
subsidiaries will be permitted to pay dividends to us only for so long as
27
we are in compliance with
all applicable financial covenants, terms and conditions of our debt. In addition, we and our
subsidiaries are subject to limitations on the payment of dividends under Marshall Islands laws. In
2009, we suspended the payment of cash dividends on our common stock because of prevailing economic
conditions and to comply with restrictions in certain of our loan agreements. Because economic
conditions remain uncertain, and because we are focusing on the renewal of our fleet, we have
determined not to resume the payment of cash dividends at this time.
As we expand our business, we will need our Manager to upgrade its operational, accounting and
financial systems, and add more staff. If our Manager cannot upgrade these systems or recruit
suitable additional employees, its services to us and, therefore, our performance may suffer.
Our current operating, accounting and financial systems are provided by our Manager and may
not be adequate if we expand the size of our fleet, our Managers efforts to improve those systems
may be ineffective. In addition, if we significantly expand our fleet, we will have to rely on our
Manager to recruit additional shore side administrative and management personnel. We cannot assure
you that our Manager will be able to continue to hire suitable additional employees as we expand
our fleet. If our Manager cannot upgrade its operational and financial systems effectively or
recruit suitable additional employees, its services to us and, therefore, our performance may
suffer and our ability to expand our business further will be restricted.
We and our Manager may be unable to attract and retain key executive officers with experience
in the shipping industry, which may reduce the effectiveness of our management and lower our
results of operations.
Our success depends to a significant extent upon the abilities and efforts of our and our
Managers executive officers. The loss of any of these individuals could adversely affect our
business prospects and financial condition. Our success will depend on retaining these key members
of our and our Managers management team. Difficulty in retaining our executive officers, and
difficulty in our Manager retaining its executive officers, could adversely affect our results of
operations and ability to pay dividends. We do not maintain key man life insurance on any of our
officers.
Technological innovation could reduce our charter hire income and the value of our vessels.
The charter hire rates and the value and operational life of a vessel are determined by a
number of factors, including the vessels efficiency, operational flexibility and physical life.
Efficiency includes speed, fuel economy and the ability to load and discharge cargo quickly.
Flexibility includes the ability to enter harbors, utilize related docking facilities and pass
through canals and straits. The length of a vessels physical life is related to its original
design and construction, its maintenance and the impact of the stress of operations. If new drybulk
carriers are built that are more efficient or more flexible or have longer physical lives than our
vessels, competition from these more technologically advanced vessels could adversely affect the
amount of charter hire payments we receive for our vessels once their initial charters expire, and
the resale value of our vessels could significantly decrease. As a result, our business, results of
operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Purchasing and operating previously owned, or secondhand, vessels may result in increased
operating costs and vessels off-hire, which could adversely affect our earnings.
The majority of our vessels were acquired second-hand, and we estimate their useful lives to
be 28 years from their date of delivery from the yard, depending on various market factors and
managements ability to comply with government and industry regulatory requirements. Part of our
business strategy includes the continued acquisition of second hand vessels when we find attractive
opportunities.
In general, expenditures necessary for maintaining a vessel in good operating condition
increase as a vessel ages. Second hand vessels may also develop unexpected mechanical and
operational problems despite adherence to regular survey schedules and proper maintenance. Cargo
insurance rates also tend to increase with a vessels age, and older vessels tend to be less
fuel-efficient than newer vessels. While the difference in fuel consumption is factored into the
freight rates that our older vessels earn, if the cost of bunker fuels were to increase
significantly, it could disproportionately affect our vessels and significantly lower our profits.
In addition, changes in governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards may require:
28
|
|
|
expenditures for alterations to existing equipment; |
|
|
|
|
the addition of new equipment; or |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the type of cargo a vessel may transport. |
We cannot give assurances that future market conditions will justify such expenditures or
enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the remainder of their economic lives.
Although we inspect the secondhand vessels that we acquire prior to purchase, this inspection
does not provide us with the same knowledge about a vessels condition and the cost of any required
(or anticipated) repairs that we would have had if this vessel had been built for and operated
exclusively by us. Generally, we do not receive the benefit of warranties on secondhand vessels.
Our substantial operations outside the United States expose us to political, governmental and
economic instability, which could harm our operations.
Because our operations are primarily conducted outside of the United States, they may be
affected by economic, political and governmental conditions in the countries where we are engaged
in business or where our vessels are registered. Future hostilities, political instability or civil
unrest in regions where we operate or may operate could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and ability to service our debt and pay dividends. In addition,
tariffs, trade embargoes and other economic sanctions by the United States or other countries
against countries where our vessels trade may limit trading activities with those countries, which
could also harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Unless we set aside reserves or are able to borrow funds for vessel replacement, at the end of
a vessels useful life our revenue will decline, which would adversely affect our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
Unless we maintain reserves or are able to borrow or raise funds for vessel replacement, we
may be unable to replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their useful lives, which
we expect to be 28 years from their date of delivery from the yard. Our cash flows and income are
dependent on the revenues earned by the chartering of our vessels to customers. If we are unable to
replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their useful lives, our business, results
of operations, financial condition and ability to pay dividends will be materially and adversely
affected. Any reserves set aside for vessel replacement may not be available for dividends.
Our board of directors has determined to suspend the payment of cash dividends as a result of
the prevailing market conditions in the international shipping industry. Until such market
conditions improve, it is not likely that we will reinstate the payment of dividends.
In light of a lower freight environment and a highly challenging financing environment, our
board of directors, beginning in February 2009, suspended the cash dividend on our common stock.
Our dividend policy will be assessed by our board of directors from time to time; however, it is
not likely that we will reinstate the payment of dividends until market conditions improve. In
addition, the amended and restated agreement with Deutsche Bank Nederland dated September 15, 2009
does not allow us to pay dividends without their prior written approval, such approval not to be
unreasonably withheld. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations Long-Term Debt Loan Agreement Covenants. Therefore, there can be no assurance
that, if we were to determine to resume paying cash dividends, Deutsche Bank Nederland would
provide any required consent.
Because we generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars but will incur a portion of our
expenses in other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse impact on our
results of operations.
We generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars, but we expect that portions of our future
expenses will be incurred in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. This difference could lead to
fluctuations in our net income due to changes in the value of the dollar relative to the other
currencies, in particular the Euro. Expenses incurred in foreign currencies against which the
dollar falls in value can increase, decreasing net income. Although for the year ended
29
December 31,
2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2010, the fluctuation in the value of the dollar against
foreign currencies had an immaterial impact on us.
Investment in derivative instruments such as freight forward agreements could result in
losses.
From time to time in the future, we may take positions in derivative instruments including
freight forward agreements, or FFAs. FFAs and other derivative instruments may be used to hedge a
vessel owners exposure to the charter market by providing for the sale of a contracted charter
rate along a specified route and period of time. Upon settlement, if the contracted charter rate is
less than the average of the rates, as reported by an identified index, for the specified route and
time period, the seller of the FFAs is required to pay the buyer an amount equal to the difference
between the contracted rate and the settlement rate, multiplied by the number of days in the
specified period. Conversely, if the contracted rate is greater than the settlement rate, the buyer
is required to pay the seller the settlement sum. If we take positions in FFAs or other derivative
instruments and do not correctly anticipate charter rate movements over the specified route and
time period, we could suffer losses in the settling or termination of the FFA. This could adversely
affect our results of operation and cash flow. As of the date of this annual report, we had no
freight forward agreements outstanding.
We may have to pay tax on United States source income, which would reduce our earnings.
Under the laws of the countries of our and our subsidiaries incorporation and/or vessels
registration, we are not subject to tax on international shipping income; however, we are subject
to registration and tonnage taxes, which have been included in Vessel operating expenses in our
consolidated statement of operations. Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of the United States,
or the Code, U.S. source income from the international operations of ships is generally exempt from
U.S. tax if the company operating the ships meets both of the following requirements, (a) the
company is organized in a foreign country that grants an equivalent exemption to corporations
organized in the United States, and (b) either (i) more than 50% of the value of the companys
stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by individuals who are residents of the companys country
of organization or of another foreign country that grants an equivalent exemption to corporations
organized in the United States (the 50% Ownership Test) or (ii) the companys stock is primarily
and regularly traded on an established securities market in its country of organization, in
another country that grants an equivalent exemption to United States corporations, or in the
United States (the Publicly-Traded Test).
To complete the exemption process, our shipowning subsidiaries must file a U.S. tax return,
state the basis of their exemption and obtain and retain documentation attesting to the basis of
their exemptions. Our subsidiaries will complete the filing process for 2010 on or prior to the
applicable tax filing deadline.
All of our ship-operating subsidiaries currently satisfy the Publicly-Traded Test based on the
trading volume and the widely-held ownership of our common stock, but no assurance can be given
that this will remain so in the future, since continued compliance with this rule is subject to
factors outside our control. Based on our U.S. source Shipping Income for 2008, 2009 and 2010, we
would be subject to U.S. federal income tax of approximately $197, $159 and $34, respectively, in
the absence of an exemption under Section 883.
U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a passive foreign investment company, which could
have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders.
A foreign corporation will be treated as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income for any taxable
year consists of certain types of passive income or (2) at least 50% of the average value of the
corporations assets produce or are held for the production of those types of passive income. For
purposes of these tests, passive income includes dividends, interest, and gains from the sale or
exchange of investment property and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties which are
received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. For
purposes of these tests, income derived from the performance of services does not constitute
passive income. U.S. shareholders of a PFIC are subject to a disadvantageous U.S. federal income
tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they receive from the
PFIC and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in the
PFIC.
30
Based on our currently anticipated operations, we do not believe that we will be a PFIC with
respect to any taxable year. In this regard, we intend to treat the gross income we derive or are
deemed to derive from our time chartering activities as services income, rather than rental income.
Accordingly, we believe that our time chartering
activities does not constitute passive income, and the assets that we own and operate in
connection with the production of that income do not constitute passive assets.
There is, however, no direct legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing our proposed
method of operation, and a recent federal court decision characterized income received from vessel
time charters as rental rather than services income for U.S. tax purposes. Accordingly, no
assurance can be given that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, or a court of law will
accept our position, and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we are
a PFIC. Moreover, no assurance can be given that we would not constitute a PFIC for any future
taxable year if there were to be changes in the nature and extent of our operations.
If the IRS were to find that we are or have been a PFIC for any taxable year, our U.S.
shareholders will face adverse U.S. tax consequences. Under the PFIC rules, unless those
shareholders make an election available under the Code (which election could itself have adverse
consequences for such shareholders), such shareholders would be liable to pay United States federal
income tax at the then prevailing income tax rates on ordinary income plus interest upon excess
distributions and upon any gain from the disposition of our common stock, as if the excess
distribution or gain had been recognized ratably over the shareholders holding period of our
common stock.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock has been and may in the future be subject to significant
fluctuations.
The market price of our common stock has been and may in the future be subject to significant
fluctuations as a result of many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Among the factors
that have in the past and could in the future affect our stock price are:
|
|
|
quarterly variations in our results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
our lenders willingness to extend our loan covenant waivers, if necessary; |
|
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies and stock market price and
volume fluctuations generally; |
|
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or publication of research reports by analysts; |
|
|
|
|
speculation in the press or investment community about our business or the
shipping industry generally; |
|
|
|
|
strategic actions by us or our competitors such as acquisitions or
restructurings; |
|
|
|
|
the thin trading market for our common stock, which makes it somewhat illiquid; |
|
|
|
|
the current ineligibility of our common stock to be the subject of margin loans
because of its low current market price; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments; |
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
general market conditions; and |
|
|
|
|
domestic and international economic, market and currency factors unrelated to
our performance. |
31
The stock markets in general, and the markets for drybulk shipping and shipping stocks in
particular, have experienced extreme volatility that has sometimes been unrelated to the operating
performance of individual companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the
trading price of our common stock.
Investors may experience significant dilution as a result of possible future offerings.
We will have [_______] shares of common stock outstanding ( [_______] shares, if the
agents option is exercised in full), which represents in the aggregate an
increase of [___% (____%)] if the agents option is exercised in full) in our
issued and outstanding shares of common stock. We may sell additional shares of common stock and
other securities convertible into shares of common stock following the conclusion of this offering
in order to fully implement our business plans. Such sales could be made at prices below the price
at which we sell the common stock offered by this prospectus, in which case, investors who purchase
shares in this offering could experience dilution of their investment, which could be significant.
As long as our stock price remains below $5.00 per share, our shareholders will not be able
to use our shares as collateral for margin accounts. Further, if our stock price falls below
$1.00, we may be subject to delisting or be forced to take action to cure this problem.
The last reported sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on March 28, 2011
was $2.78 per share. If the market price of our shares of common stock remains below $5.00 per
share, under Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, rules, our shareholders will not be
able to use such shares as collateral for borrowing in margin accounts. This inability to continue
to use our common stock as collateral may lead to sales of such shares creating downward pressure
on and increased volatility in, the market price of our shares of common stock. In addition, many
institutional investors will not invest in stocks whose prices are below $5.00 per share.
Under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, listed companies have historically been required
to maintain a share price of at least $1.00 per share and if the share price declines below $1.00
for a period of 30 consecutive business days, then the listed company would have a cure period of
at least 180 days to regain compliance with the $1.00 per share minimum. If our share price
declines below $1.00, we may be required to take action, such as a reverse stock split, in order to
comply with NASDAQ rules that may be in effect at the time. We may raise additional equity capital
at the market and/or in privately negotiated transactions. The effect of this may be to depress our
share price and dilute our shareholders investment.
Future sales of our stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the
perception that these sales could occur, may depress the market price for our common stock. These
sales could also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our equity
securities in the future. We may issue additional shares of our stock in the future and our
shareholders may elect to sell large numbers of shares held by them from time to time.
Because the Republic of the Marshall Islands, where we are incorporated, does not have a
well-developed body of corporate law, shareholders may have fewer rights and protections than
under typical United States law, such as Delaware, and shareholders may have difficulty in
protecting their interest with regard to actions taken by our Board of Directors.
Our corporate affairs are governed by amended and restated articles of incorporation and
by-laws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act, or BCA. The provisions of the BCA
resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However,
there have been few judicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA.
The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the law of the Republic of the
Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of
directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in certain U.S. jurisdictions.
Shareholder rights may differ as well. For example, under Marshall Islands law, a copy of the
notice of any meeting of the shareholders must be given not less than 15 days before the meeting,
whereas in Delaware such notice must be given not less than 10 days before the meeting. Therefore,
if immediate shareholder action is required, a meeting may not be able to be convened as quickly as
it can be convened under Delaware law. Also, under Marshall Islands law, any action required to be
taken by a meeting of shareholders may only be taken without a meeting if consent is in writing
32
and
is signed by all of the shareholders entitled to vote, whereas under Delaware law action may be
taken by consent if approved by the number of shareholders that would be required to approve such
action at a meeting. Therefore, under Marshall Islands law, it may be more difficult for a company
to take certain actions without a meeting even if a majority of the shareholders approve of such
action. While the BCA does specifically incorporate the non-statutory
law, or judicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially
similar legislative provisions, public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their
interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling shareholders than
would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a U.S. jurisdiction.
It may not be possible for investors to enforce U.S. judgments against us.
We, and all our subsidiaries, are or will be incorporated in jurisdictions outside the U.S.
and substantially all of our assets and those of our subsidiaries and will be located outside the
U.S. In addition, most of our directors and officers are or will be non-residents of the U.S., and
all or a substantial portion of the assets of these non-residents are or will be located outside
the U.S. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for U.S. investors to serve process within
the U.S. upon us, our subsidiaries, or our directors and officers, or to enforce a judgment against
us for civil liabilities in U.S. courts. In addition, you should not assume that courts in the
countries in which we or our subsidiaries are incorporated or where our or the assets of our
subsidiaries are located would enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions against us or
our subsidiaries based upon the civil liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state
securities laws or would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against us or our subsidiaries
based on those laws.
Provisions in our organizational documents, our management agreement and under Marshall
Islands corporate law, could make it difficult for our shareholders to replace or remove our
current Board of Directors or have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger or
acquisition, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Several provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and by-laws, and
certain provisions of the Marshall Islands corporate law, could make it difficult for our
shareholders to change the composition of our Board of Directors in any one year, preventing them
from changing the composition of management. In addition, these provisions may discourage, delay or
prevent a merger or acquisition that shareholders may consider favorable. These provisions include:
|
|
|
authorizing our Board of Directors to issue blank check preferred stock
without shareholder approval; |
|
|
|
|
providing for a classified Board of Directors with staggered, three year terms; |
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors; |
|
|
|
|
|
authorizing the removal of directors only for cause and only upon the
affirmative vote of the holders of a two-thirds majority of the outstanding shares of
our common shares, voting as a single class, entitled to vote for the directors; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
limiting the persons who may call special meetings of shareholders; |
|
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for election to our Board of Directors
or proposing matters that can be acted on by shareholders at shareholder meetings; and |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to enter into business combination transactions with
certain shareholders. |
Furthermore, pursuant to the terms of our management agreement, our Manager is entitled to a
termination fee if such agreement is terminated upon a change of control. The termination fee as
of December 31, 2010 would be approximately $100.3 million. In addition, we have implemented a
shareholder rights plan pursuant to which the holders of our common stock receive one right to
purchase one one-thousandth of a share of our Series A Participating Preferred Stock at an exercise
price of $90.00 per share, subject to adjustment. The rights become exercisable upon the occurrence
of certain change in control events. These provisions and our shareholder rights plan could
substantially impede the ability of public shareholders to benefit from a change in control and, as
a result,
33
may adversely affect the market price of our common shares and your ability to realize
any potential change of control premium.
34
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
include information about possible or assumed future results of our operations and our performance.
Our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding us or our
managements expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future and other
statements other than statements of historical fact. In addition, any statements that refer to
projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any
underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words anticipates, forcasts,
believe, continue, could, estimate, expect, intends, may, might, plan,
possible, potential, predicts, project, should, would and similar expressions may
identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement
is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements in this prospectus may include, for example,
statements about our:
|
|
|
our future operating or financial results; |
|
|
|
|
our financial condition and liquidity, including our ability to comply with our
loan covenants and to obtain additional financing in the future to fund capital
expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate activities; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to pay dividends in the future; |
|
|
|
|
drybulk shipping industry trends, including charter rates and factors affecting
vessel supply and demand; |
|
|
|
|
future, pending or recent acquisitions, business strategy, areas of possible
expansion, and expected capital spending or operating expenses and general and
administrative expenses; |
|
|
|
|
the useful lives and value of our vessels; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to receive in full or partially our accounts receivable and
insurance claims; |
|
|
|
|
greater than anticipated levels of drybulk vessel new building orders or lower
than anticipated rates of drybulk vessel scrapping; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the cost of other modes of bulk commodity transportation; |
|
|
|
|
availability of crew, number of off-hire days, dry-docking requirements and
insurance costs; |
|
|
|
|
changes in condition of our vessels or applicable maintenance or regulatory
standards (which may affect, among other things, our anticipated dry-docking costs); |
|
|
|
|
competition in the seaborne transportation industry; |
|
|
|
|
global and regional economic and political conditions; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currencies and interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to leverage to our advantage our Managers relationships and
reputation in the drybulk shipping industry; |
|
|
|
|
|
the overall health and condition of the U.S. and global financial markets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns; |
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory
authorities; |
|
|
|
|
|
potential liability from future litigation and incidents involving our vessels
and our expected recoveries of claims under our insurance policies; |
|
35
|
|
|
acts of terrorism and other hostilities; and |
|
|
|
|
|
other factors discussed in the section titled Risk Factors in this
prospectus. |
|
The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus are based on our current
expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. There
can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated.
These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond
our control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially
different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those factors described under the heading Risk
Factors. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our
assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in
these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise,
except as may be required under applicable securities laws and/or if and when management knows or
has a reasonable basis on which to conclude that previously disclosed projections are no longer
reasonably attainable.
36
PRICE RANGE OF OUR PUBLICLY TRADED SECURITIES
Our common stock and Class Z warrants began trading on the NASDAQ Global Market on November 8,
2007 under the trading symbols FREE and FREEZ, respectively. Prior to that time our common stock
and Class Z warrants were traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbols FREE and FREEZ,
respectively.
The closing high and low sales prices of our common stock and Class Z warrants as reported by
the NASDAQ Stock Market, for the quarters and months indicated, are as follows (adjusted to give
effect of our one share for five share reverse stock split that was effective on October 1, 2010):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Class Z Warrants |
|
For the Years Ended: |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
27.25 |
|
|
$ |
13.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
51.20 |
|
|
|
13.80 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
39.85 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
17.45 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
7.95 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Class Z Warrants |
|
For the Quarters Ended: |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
9.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
17.45 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
12.15 |
|
|
|
7.85 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
|
6.40 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
7.45 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
March 2011 (through March 28) |
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Class Z Warrants |
|
For the Months Ended: |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
5.35 |
|
|
$ |
4.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
October 31, 2010 |
|
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
November 30, 2010 |
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
4.08 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
January 31, 2011 |
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
February 28, 2011 |
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
March 2011 (through March 28) |
|
|
3.49 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
37
DIVIDEND POLICY
In 2009, we suspended the payment of cash dividends on our common stock because of prevailing
economic conditions and to comply with restrictions in certain of our loan agreements. Because
economic conditions remain uncertain, and because we are focusing on the renewal of our fleet, we
have determined not to resume the payment of cash dividends at this time. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Long-Term Debt Loan
Agreement Covenants. We anticipate that we will not pay cash dividends in the near term while we
focus on reducing our debt and renewing our fleet.
Declaration and payment of any dividend is subject to the discretion of our board of
directors. The timing and amount of dividend payments will be dependent upon our earnings,
financial condition, cash requirements and availability, restrictions in our loan agreements or
other financing arrangements, the provisions of Marshall Islands law affecting the payment of
distributions to stockholders, and other factors. The payment of dividends is not guaranteed or
assured, and may be discontinued at any time at the discretion of our board of directors. Because
we are a holding company with no material assets other than the stock of our subsidiaries, our
ability to pay dividends will depend on the earnings and cash flow of our subsidiaries and their
ability to pay dividends to us. If there is a substantial decline in the drybulk carrier market,
our earnings would be negatively affected thus limiting our ability to pay dividends. Marshall
Islands law generally prohibits the payment of dividends other than from surplus or while a
company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent upon the payment thereof. As noted above, our
loan agreements contain restrictions on our payment of dividends in certain circumstances. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Long-Term
Debt Loan Agreement Covenants and Waivers.
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that we will receive net proceeds of approximately $[____] from this offering,
assuming that the agents option is not exercised and after deducting
the agents fees and offering expenses, based on
$[____] per share. The
closing price of our common stock on March 28, 2011 was $2.78. We intend to use the net proceeds of
this offering to purchase additional vessels, for repayment of debt
(as described below) and for general working capital
purposes. We are required to use approximately $1.3 million of the proceeds of this offering to
prepay the Deutsche Bank Nederland facilities. As of March 28, 2011, borrowings under our Deutsche
Bank Nederland facilities were approximately $33,709. The weighted average interest rate on the
principal balance under our Deutsche Bank Nederland facilities for the year ended December 31, 2010
was 3.67%. Our Deutsche Bank Nederland facilities have maturity dates of December 2015 for facility
A and November 2012 for facility B. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Long Term Debt.
38
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the
difference between the public offering price for each share of our common stock and the pro forma
net tangible book value per share of our common stock after this offering. Dilution results from
the fact that the per-share offering price of the common stock is greater than the net tangible
book value per share for the common stock outstanding before this offering.
At
December 31, 2010, we had net tangible book value of $123,190, or $18.99 per share.
After giving effect to the issuance of [________] shares of common stock offered in this offering,
at an offering price of $[_____] per share, the pro forma net tangible book value at December 31,
2010 would have been $[_________], or $[_____] per share. This represents an immediate appreciation
in net tangible book value and adjusted net tangible book value at December 31, 2010 of $[______]
per share to existing shareholders and an immediate dilution of net tangible book value of $[_____]
per share to new investors. The following table illustrates the pro forma per share dilution and
appreciation at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December |
|
|
|
31, 2010 |
|
Assumed offering price per share in this offering |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share |
|
$ |
18.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors in
this offering |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to the new investors(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering
price of $[____] per share would increase (decrease) our as
adjusted net tangible book value by $[____] million, or $[____]
per share, and increase (decrease) dilution in net tangible book
value per share to investors in this offering by $[____] per
share, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and
after deducting the estimated agents fees, and offering expenses. The information in the table
above is illustrative only, and following the completion of this
offering, our capitalization will be adjusted based on the actual
public offering price and other terms of this offering determined
at pricing. |
|
Net tangible book value per share of our common stock is determined by dividing our
tangible net worth, which consists of tangible assets less liabilities, by the number of shares of
our common stock outstanding. Dilution is determined by subtracting the net tangible book value per
share of common stock after this offering from the public offering price per share. Dilution per
share to new investors would be $[___] if the
agents option is exercised in
full.
39
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our consolidated capitalization as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as adjusted as of December 31, 2010 to give effect to the scheduled loan
repayments of $3,588 we made from January 1, 2011 through March 28, 2011; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as further adjusted to give effect to our issuance and sale of [_____] shares
of common stock at a price of $[___] per
share, net of the agents fees on certain
shares and offering expenses (assuming no exercise of the
agents option), and application of the net proceeds as described under Use of Proceeds. |
|
Other than as set forth in the As Adjusted column, there have been no material changes in
our capitalization between December 31, 2010 and the date of this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Further |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
As Adjusted |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
|
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share amounts) |
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, current portion |
|
$ |
23,022 |
|
|
$ |
23,234 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
97,437 |
|
|
|
93,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt(1) |
|
$ |
120,459 |
|
|
$ |
116,871 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none
issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized,
6,487,852, 6,487,852 and
[__________]
shares issued and outstanding
actual, as adjusted, and as further adjusted, respectively |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
127,634 |
|
|
|
127,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
(4,450 |
) |
|
|
(4,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
123,190 |
|
|
|
123,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
$ |
243,649 |
|
|
$ |
240,061 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total debt does not include the fair value of the derivative
liabilities, which was $1.1 million as of December 31, 2010. |
|
40
SELECTED HISTORICALFINANCIAL INFORMATION AND OTHER DATA
The following selected historical financial information and other data were derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007
and 2006. The information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our historical
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, in our
annual report on Form 20-F filed on April 14, 2009 for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the
section of this prospectus titled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations. The historical data included below and elsewhere in this prospectus are not
necessarily indicative of our future performance.
All amounts in the tables below are in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for share data, per
share data and per diem amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
57,650 |
|
|
$ |
57,533 |
|
|
$ |
66,689 |
|
|
$ |
20,147 |
|
|
$ |
11,727 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
(1,887 |
) |
|
|
(1,394 |
) |
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(689 |
) |
Commissions |
|
|
(3,357 |
) |
|
|
(3,089 |
) |
|
|
(3,383 |
) |
|
|
(1,095 |
) |
|
|
(799 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
(18,607 |
) |
|
|
(17,813 |
) |
|
|
(16,354 |
) |
|
|
(6,001 |
) |
|
|
(4,483 |
) |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
(15,365 |
) |
|
|
(16,006 |
) |
|
|
(13,349 |
) |
|
|
(4,435 |
) |
|
|
(4,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred charges |
|
|
(1,888 |
) |
|
|
(1,742 |
) |
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management and other fees to a related party |
|
|
(1,978 |
) |
|
|
(1,874 |
) |
|
|
(2,634 |
) |
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(4,494 |
) |
|
|
(4,156 |
) |
|
|
(2,863 |
) |
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
|
|
(2,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision and write-offs of insurance
claims and bad debts |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of vessel |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel impairment loss |
|
|
(26,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
(17,000 |
) |
|
$ |
11,459 |
|
|
$ |
26,570 |
|
|
$ |
5,761 |
|
|
$ |
(2,281 |
) |
Interest and finance costs |
|
|
(4,375 |
) |
|
|
(4,323 |
) |
|
|
(6,453 |
) |
|
|
(5,774 |
) |
|
|
(1,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on derivative instruments |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(1,456 |
) |
|
|
(749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Other |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(21,821 |
) |
|
$ |
6,859 |
|
|
$ |
19,192 |
|
|
$ |
(156 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(3.46 |
) |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
4.57 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(3.46 |
) |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares |
|
|
6,313,606 |
|
|
|
5,092,772 |
|
|
|
4,201,299 |
|
|
|
1,757,613 |
|
|
|
1,258,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares |
|
|
6,313,606 |
|
|
|
5,092,772 |
|
|
|
4,210,393 |
|
|
|
1,757,613 |
|
|
|
1,258,376 |
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.875 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, including cash |
|
$ |
27,691 |
|
|
$ |
22,125 |
|
|
$ |
27,184 |
|
|
$ |
81,440 |
|
|
$ |
1,417 |
|
Vessels, net |
|
|
213,691 |
|
|
|
270,701 |
|
|
|
275,405 |
|
|
|
108,021 |
|
|
|
19,369 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
250,984 |
|
|
|
297,321 |
|
|
|
307,861 |
|
|
|
191,972 |
|
|
|
23,086 |
|
Total current liabilities,
including current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
29,819 |
|
|
|
29,488 |
|
|
|
50,768 |
|
|
|
34,097 |
|
|
|
10,260 |
|
Derivative financial
instruments, net of current
portion |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including
shareholder loans net of
current portion |
|
|
97,437 |
|
|
|
122,559 |
|
|
|
133,650 |
|
|
|
44,500 |
|
|
|
5,819 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
127,794 |
|
|
|
152,869 |
|
|
|
187,006 |
|
|
|
79,346 |
|
|
|
16,079 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
123,190 |
|
|
|
144,452 |
|
|
|
120,855 |
|
|
|
112,626 |
|
|
|
7,007 |
|
41
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition
and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
that appear elsewhere in this prospectus. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in conformity with U.S. GAAP. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
The historical consolidated financial results of FreeSeas described below are presented,
unless otherwise stated, in thousands of United States dollars.
Overview
Our fleet consists of seven Handysize vessels and two Handymax vessels that carry a variety
of drybulk commodities, including iron ore, grain and coal, which are referred to as major bulks,
as well as bauxite, phosphate, fertilizers, steel products, cement, sugar and rice, or minor
bulks. Additionally, we entered into contracts to purchase two Handysize drybulk carriers of
approximately 33,600 dwt each, from a reputable Chinese shipyard, scheduled for delivery in the
second and third quarter of 2012. As of March 28, 2011, the aggregate dwt of our operational fleet
is approximately 274,000 dwt and the average age of our fleet is approximately 14 years.
We are currently focusing on the Handysize and Handymax sectors, which we believe are more
versatile in the types of cargoes that they can carry and trade routes they can follow, and offer
less volatile returns than larger vessel classes. We may, however, acquire larger drybulk vessels
if appropriate opportunities present themselves.
We have contracted the management of our fleet to our Manager. Our Manager provides technical
management of our fleet, accounting services and office space and has subcontracted the charter and
post-charter management of our fleet to Safbulk. While Safbulk is responsible for finding and
arranging charters for our vessels, the final decision to charter our vessels remains with us.
Recent Developments
Sale of M/V Free Destiny
On July 30, 2010, we entered into an agreement to sell the M/V Free Destiny, a 1982-built
25,240 dwt Handysize drybulk vessel, for a price of $3,213. The vessel was delivered to the buyers
on August 27, 2010. We recognized a gain of $807. From the proceeds of the sale, we prepaid $2,700
toward the Deutsche Bank Nederland N.V., formerly known as Hollandsche Bank Unie, or HBU, loan
facility.
Newbuilding Contracts
On August 17, 2010, we entered into newbuilding contracts with a Chinese shipyard for the
construction of two Handysize drybulk vessels of approximately 33,600 dwt each for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $48,800 (excluding extra costs of approximately $920). The vessels
are scheduled for delivery in the second and third quarters of 2012. We have determined that under
present market conditions there is an arbitrage opportunity in ordering two newbuildings that yield
higher individual earnings potential over a combined available lifespan of 56 years upon delivery,
compared with three of its existing older vessels which have a combined remaining useful life of 39
years and are worth the same aggregate value as the aggregate newbuilding contract price for the
two newbuildings.
Commitments for Newbuildings Pre-Delivery and Post-Delivery Financing
On September 10, 2010, we signed an offer letter with ABN AMRO Bank securing, subject to
customary legal documentation, binding commitments for pre-delivery and post-delivery debt
financing up to an amount of $32,400 for the construction of the two newbuildings.
42
1:5 Reverse Stock Split
On September 30, 2010 in the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders our shareholders approved
a reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock, effective on October 1, 2010, at
a ratio of one share for every five shares outstanding. The reverse stock split consolidates five
shares of common stock into one share of common stock, par value of $.001 per share.
Vessels Classified as Held for Sale and Impairment Charges
On October 1, 2010, we classified the M/V Free Hero, a 1995-built 24,318 dwt Handysize drybulk
vessel, as held for sale for the year ended December 31, 2010 at its estimated market value, less
cost to sell, as all criteria required for the classification of a vessel as held for sale were
met. To date, no agreement has been reached to sell the M/V Free Hero. Additionally, on February
28, 2011, we initiated a plan of sale of the M/V Free Neptune, a 1996-built 30,838 dwt Handysize
drybulk vessel, and M/V Free Impala, a 1997-built 24,111 dwt Handysize drybulk vessel. We have
individually assessed for recoverability the carrying values of each of the above vessels. We have
recorded at December 31, 2010 an impairment loss of $26.6 million by reference to the fair market
values of the M/V Free Hero and the M/V Free Impala. No impairment loss was recognized for the M/V
Free Neptune as its fair value exceeded its carrying value.
Employment and Charter Rates
All of our vessels are currently being chartered in the spot market. The following table
presents our fleet information as of March 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Name |
|
Type |
|
Built |
|
Dwt |
|
Employment |
M/V Free Lady |
|
Handymax |
|
2003 |
|
|
50,246 |
|
|
About 3-5 month time charter at $14,000 per day for the first 120 days and $15,500 for the balance period through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Jupiter |
|
Handymax |
|
2002 |
|
|
47,777 |
|
|
About 65 day time charter trip at $6,750 per day and $13,000 for any day in excess of 80 days through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Knight |
|
Handysize |
|
1998 |
|
|
24,111 |
|
|
80 day time charter trip at $10,000 per day through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Maverick |
|
Handysize |
|
1998 |
|
|
23,994 |
|
|
About 62 day time charter trip at $9,100 per day through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Impala |
|
Handysize |
|
1997 |
|
|
24,111 |
|
|
25 day time charter trip at $13,000 per day through April 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Neptune |
|
Handysize |
|
1996 |
|
|
30,838 |
|
|
4-6 months time charter at $14,000 per day for the first 115 days and $15,250 thereafter, through April/July 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Hero |
|
Handysize |
|
1995 |
|
|
24,318 |
|
|
20-25 day time charter trip at $13,250 per day through April 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Goddess |
|
Handysize |
|
1995 |
|
|
22,051 |
|
|
25 day time charter trip at $12,500 per day through March/April 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Envoy |
|
Handysize |
|
1984 |
|
|
26,318 |
|
|
35-40 day time charter trip at $8,250 per day through April 2011 |
Vessel Acquisitions and Dispositions
During the last three fiscal years, our capital expenditures and divestitures related to our
efforts to renew and expand our fleet were as follows:
|
|
|
|
On August 17, 2010, we entered into two newbuilding contracts with a Chinese
shipyard for the construction of two Handysize drybulk vessels of approximately 33,600
dwt each, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $48,800 (excluding extra
costs of approximately $920). The vessels are scheduled for delivery in the second and
third quarters of 2012. |
|
43
|
|
|
On July 30, 2010, we entered into an agreement to sell the M/V Free Destiny for a
price of $3,213. The vessel was delivered to the buyers on August 27, 2010 and we
recognized a gain of $807. |
|
|
|
On August 5, 2009, the Company purchased the M/V Free Neptune from an unaffiliated
third party for approximately $11,000 and related purchase costs of $302. |
|
|
|
On September 1, 2008, the Company purchased the M/V Free Maverick for the cash
purchase price of $39,600 and related purchase costs of $12. |
|
|
|
On July 7, 2008, the Company purchased the M/V Free Lady for a cash purchase price
of $65,200 and related purchase costs of $157. |
|
|
|
On April 2, 2008, the Company purchased the M/V Free Impala for the purchase price
of $37,500 and related purchase costs of $420. |
|
|
|
On March 19, 2008, the Company purchased M/V Free Knight for the purchase price of
$39,250 and related purchase costs of $400. |
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon
our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The
preparation of those financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure at the
date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions and conditions. Critical accounting policies are those that reflect significant
judgments of uncertainties and potentially result in materially different results under different
assumptions and conditions. We have described below what we believe are our most critical
accounting policies, because they generally involve a comparatively higher degree of judgment in
their application. For a description of all our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets: We follow the guidance under ASC 360, Property, Plant and
Equipment, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of
long-lived assets. The standard requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles held and used or disposed of by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable.
When the estimate of undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to be generated
by the use of the asset is less than its carrying amount, we should evaluate the asset for an
impairment loss. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset which
is determined based on management estimates and assumptions and by making use of available market
data. We evaluate the carrying amounts and periods over which long-lived assets are depreciated to
determine if events have occurred which would require modification to their carrying values or
useful lives. In evaluating useful lives and carrying values of long-lived assets, management
reviews certain indicators of potential impairment, such as future undiscounted net operating cash
flows, vessel sales and purchases, business plans and overall market conditions. In performing the
recoverability tests we determine future undiscounted net operating cash flows for each vessel and
compare it to the vessels carrying value. The future undiscounted net operating cash flows are
determined by considering our alternative courses of action, estimated vessels utilization, its
scrap value, the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days and an
estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days over the remaining estimated useful
life of the vessel, net of vessel operating expenses adjusted for inflation, and cost of scheduled
major maintenance. When our estimate of future undiscounted net operating cash flows for any vessel
is lower than the vessels carrying value, the carrying value is written down to the vessels fair
market value, if the fair market value is lower than the vessels carrying value, by recording a
charge to operations. As of December 31, 2010, we performed an impairment assessment of its
long-lived assets by comparing the undiscounted net operating cash flows for each vessel to its
respective carrying value. The significant factors and assumptions we used in each future
undiscounted net operating cash flow analysis included, among others, operating revenues, off-hire
days, dry-docking costs, operating expenses and management fee estimates. Revenue assumptions were
based on contracted time charter rates up to the end of life of the current contract of each vessel
as well as Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs) and market historical average time charter rates for
the remaining life of the vessel after the completion of the current contracts. In addition, we
used annual operating expenses escalation factor and an estimate
44
of off hire days. All estimates used and assumptions made were in accordance with our internal
budgets and historical experiences. Our assessment concluded that no impairment existed as of
December 31, 2010 for any of its vessels which it intends to hold, as the future undiscounted net
operating cash flows per vessel exceeded the carrying value of each vessel. As a result of our
decision to sell the M/V Free Impala and the M/V Free Hero, an impairment loss of $26,631, of which
$17,253 relates to the M/V Free Impala and $9,378 relates to the M/V Free Hero, was recognized in
2010 and reflected in our consolidated statement of operations.
Vessels Depreciation: The cost of our vessels is depreciated on a straight-line
basis over the vessels remaining economic useful lives from the acquisition date, after
considering the estimated residual value. Effective April 1, 2009, and following managements
reassessment of the useful lives of our assets, the fleet useful life was increased from 27 to 28
years. Managements estimate was based on the current vessels operating condition, as well as the
conditions prevailing in the market for the same type of vessels.
Accounting for Special Survey and Dry-docking Costs: We follow the deferral method
of accounting for special survey and dry-docking costs, whereby actual costs incurred are deferred
and are amortized over a period of five and two and a half years, respectively. If special survey
or dry-docking is performed prior to the scheduled date, the remaining un-amortized balances are
immediately written-off. Indirect costs and/or costs related to ordinary maintenance, carried out
while at dry dock, are expensed when incurred as they do not provide any future economic benefit.
Accounting for Revenue and Expenses: Revenue is recorded when services are
rendered, we have a signed charter agreement or other evidence of an arrangement, the price is
fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Voyage revenues for the transportation
of cargo are recognized ratably over the estimated relative transit
time of each voyage. A voyage is deemed to commence when a vessel is
available for loading of its next fixed cargo and is deemed to end upon the completion of the discharge of the current
cargo. Under a voyage charter, we agree to provide a vessel for the transportation of specific goods
between specific ports in return for payment of an agreed upon freight rate per ton of cargo.
Revenues from time chartering of vessels are accounted for as operating leases and are thus
recognized on a straight line basis as the average revenue over the rental periods of such charter
agreements, as service is provided. A time charter involves placing a
vessel at the charterers disposal for a period of time during which the charterer uses the vessel
in return for the payment of a specified daily hire rate. Short period charters for less than three
months are referred to as spot charters. Time charters extending three months to a year are
generally referred to as medium term charters. All other time
charters are considered long term. Voyage expenses, primarily consisting of port, canal and bunker
expenses that are unique to a particular charter, are paid for by the charterer under time charter arrangements
or by us under voyage charter arrangements, except for commissions, which are always paid for
by us, regardless of charter type. All voyage and vessel operating expenses are expensed as
incurred, except for commissions. Commissions are deferred over the related voyage charter period to the
extent revenue has been deferred since commissions are earned as our revenues are earned.
Probable losses on voyages in progress are provided for in full at the time such losses can be estimated.
Important Measures for Analyzing Results of Operations
We believe that the important measures for analyzing trends in the results of our operations
consist of the following:
|
|
|
Ownership days. We define ownership days as the total number of calendar days
in a period during which each vessel in the fleet was owned by us. Ownership days are
an indicator of the size of the fleet over a period and affect both the amount of
revenues earned and the amount of expenses that we incur during that period. |
|
|
|
Available days. We define available days as the number of ownership days less
the aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to major repairs,
dry-dockings or special or intermediate surveys. The shipping industry uses available
days to measure the number of ownership days in a period during which vessels are
actually capable of generating revenues. |
|
|
|
Operating days. We define operating days as the number of available days in a
period less the aggregate number of days that vessels are off-hire due to any reason,
including unforeseen circumstances. The shipping industry uses operating days to
measure the aggregate number of days in a period during which vessels could actually
generate revenues. |
45
|
|
|
|
Fleet utilization. We calculate fleet utilization by dividing the number of
operating days during a period by the number of available days during that period. The
shipping industry uses fleet utilization to measure a companys efficiency properly
operating its vessels and minimizing the amount of days that its vessels are off-hire
for any unforeseen reason. |
|
|
|
|
Off-hire. The period a vessel is unable to perform the services for which it
is required under a charter. Off-hire periods typically include days spent undergoing
repairs and dry-docking, whether or not scheduled. |
|
|
|
Time charter. A time charter is a contract for the use of a vessel for a
specific period of time during which the charterer pays substantially all of the voyage
expenses, including port costs, canal charges and bunkers expenses. The vessel owner
pays the vessel operating expenses, which include crew wages, insurance, technical
maintenance costs, spares, stores and supplies and commissions on gross voyage
revenues. Time charter rates are usually fixed during the term of the charter.
Prevailing time charter rates do fluctuate on a seasonal and year-to-year basis and may
be substantially higher or lower from a prior time charter agreement when the subject
vessel is seeking to renew the time charter agreement with the existing charterer or
enter into a new time charter agreement with another charterer. Fluctuations in time
charter rates are influenced by changes in spot charter rates. |
|
|
|
Voyage charter. A voyage charter is an agreement to charter the vessel for an
agreed per-ton amount of freight from specified loading port(s) to specified discharge
port(s). In contrast to a time charter, the vessel owner is required to pay
substantially all of the voyage expenses, including port costs, canal charges and
bunkers expenses, in addition to the vessel operating expenses. |
|
|
|
Time charter equivalent (TCE). The time charter equivalent, or TCE, equals
voyage revenues minus voyage expenses divided by the number of operating days during
the relevant time period, including the trip to the loading port. TCE is a non-GAAP,
standard seaborne transportation industry performance measure used primarily to compare
period-to-period changes in a seaborne transportation companys performance despite
changes in the mix of charter types (i.e., spot charters, time charters and bareboat
charters) under which the vessels may be employed during a specific period. |
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA. We consider Adjusted EBITDA to represent net earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, amortization of deferred revenue, back
log asset, (gain)/loss on derivative instruments, stock-based compensation expense,
vessel impairment loss, provision and write-offs of insurance claims and bad debts and
(gain)/loss on sale of vessel. Under the laws of the Marshall Islands, we are not
subject to tax on international shipping income. However, we are subject to
registration and tonnage taxes, which have been included in vessel operating expenses.
Accordingly, no adjustment for taxes has been made for purposes of calculating Adjusted
EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and does not represent and should not be
considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations, as determined
by U.S. GAAP, and our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to that
reported by other companies. Adjusted EBITDA is included herein because it is an
alternative measure of our performance. |
Performance Indicators
|
|
|
(All amounts in tables in thousands of U.S. dollars except for fleet data and
average daily results) |
The following performance measures were derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 included elsewhere in this report.
The historical data included below is not necessarily indicative of our future performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Adjusted EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
26,834 |
|
|
$ |
30,337 |
|
|
$ |
41,517 |
|
Fleet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of vessels (2) |
|
|
9.65 |
|
|
|
9.35 |
|
|
|
7.36 |
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Ownership days (3) |
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
3,414 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
Available days (4) |
|
|
3,430 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
Operating days (5) |
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
Fleet utilization (6) |
|
|
97.1 |
% |
|
|
97.7 |
% |
|
|
93.7 |
% |
Average Daily Results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average TCE rate (7) |
|
$ |
15,742 |
|
|
$ |
16,105 |
|
|
$ |
25,719 |
|
Vessel operating expenses (8) |
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
5,218 |
|
|
|
6,084 |
|
Management fees (9) |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
General and administrative expenses(10) |
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
Total vessel operating expenses (11) |
|
$ |
5,843 |
|
|
$ |
5,767 |
|
|
$ |
6,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation to net income: Adjusted EBITDA represents net earnings before,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, amortization of deferred revenue, back log asset,
(gain)/loss on derivative instruments, stock-based compensation expense, vessel impairment loss,
interest and finance cost net, provision and write-offs of insurance claims and bad debts
and (gain)/loss on sale of vessel. Under the laws of the Marshall Islands, we are not subject to
tax on international shipping income. However, we are subject to registration and tonnage taxes,
which have been included in vessel operating expenses. Accordingly, no adjustment for taxes has
been made for purposes of calculating Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and
does not represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from
operations, as determined by U.S. GAAP, and our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be
comparable to that reported by other companies. Adjusted EBITDA is included herein because it is
an alternative measure of our performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(21,821 |
) |
|
$ |
6,859 |
|
|
$ |
19,192 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
17,253 |
|
|
|
17,748 |
|
|
|
14,137 |
|
Amortization of deferred revenue |
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(368 |
) |
Back log asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Vessel impairment loss |
|
|
26,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
Interest and finance cost, net of interest income |
|
|
4,338 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
|
|
5,873 |
|
(Gain) on sale of vessel |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision and write-offs of insurance claims and bad debts |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
26,834 |
|
|
$ |
30,337 |
|
|
$ |
41,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Average number of vessels is the number of vessels that constituted
our fleet for the relevant period, as measured by the sum of the
number of days each vessel was a part of our fleet during the period
divided by the number of calendar days in the period. |
|
(3) |
|
Ownership days are the total number of days in a period during which
the vessels in our fleet have been owned by us. Ownership days are an
indicator of the size of our fleet over a period and affect both the
amount of revenues and the amount of expenses that we record during a
period. |
|
|
(4) |
|
Available days are the number of ownership days less the
aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to
major repairs, dry dockings or special or intermediate surveys.
The shipping industry uses available days to measure the number
of ownership days in a period during which vessels should be
capable of generating revenues. |
|
47
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Operating days are the number of available days less the
aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to any
reason, including unforeseen circumstances. The shipping industry
uses operating days to measure the aggregate number of days in a
period during which vessels could actually generate revenues. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
We calculate fleet utilization by dividing the number of our fleets
operating days during a period by the number of available days during
the period. The shipping industry uses fleet utilization to measure a
companys efficiency in properly operating its vessels and minimizing
the amount of days that its vessels are off-hire for any unforeseen
reasons. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
TCE is a non-GAAP measure of the average daily revenue
performance of a vessel on a per voyage basis. Our
method of calculating TCE is consistent with industry
standards and is determined by dividing operating
revenues (net of voyage expenses and commissions) by
operating days for the relevant time period. Voyage
expenses primarily consist of port, canal and fuel
costs that are unique to a particular voyage, which
would otherwise be paid by the charterer under a time
charter contract. TCE is a standard shipping industry
performance measure used primarily to compare
period-to-period changes in a shipping companys
performance despite changes in the mix of charter
types (i.e., spot charters, time charters and bareboat
charters) under which the vessels may be employed
between the periods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
57,650 |
|
|
$ |
57,533 |
|
|
$ |
66,689 |
|
Voyage expenses and commissions |
|
|
(5,244 |
) |
|
|
(4,483 |
) |
|
|
(3,910 |
) |
Net operating revenues |
|
|
52,406 |
|
|
|
53,050 |
|
|
|
62,779 |
|
Operating days |
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter equivalent daily rate |
|
$ |
15,742 |
|
|
$ |
16,105 |
|
|
$ |
25,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Average daily vessel operating expenses,
which includes crew costs, provisions, deck and engine
stores, lubricating oil, insurance, maintenance and
repairs, is calculated by dividing vessel operating
expenses by ownership days for the relevant time
periods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
$ |
18,607 |
|
|
$ |
17,813 |
|
|
$ |
16,354 |
|
Ownership days |
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
3,414 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily vessel operating expenses |
|
$ |
5,282 |
|
|
$ |
5,218 |
|
|
$ |
6,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Daily management fees are calculated by dividing total management
fees paid on ships owned by ownership days for the relevant time
period. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Average daily general and administrative expenses are calculated by
dividing general and administrative expenses (excluding stock-based
compensation expense) by ownership days for the relevant period. |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Total vessel operating expenses, or TVOE, is a measurement of our
total expenses associated with operating our vessels. TVOE is the sum
of vessel operating expense and management fees. Daily TVOE is
calculated by dividing TVOE by fleet ownership days for the relevant
time period. |
|
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2010 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
REVENUES Operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $57,650 compared to
$57,533 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The slight increase of $117 is attributable to the
increase of the average number of vessels in our fleet from 9.35 for the year ended December 31,
2009 to 9.65 for the year ended
48
December 31, 2010, which was partially offset by the lower average daily TCE rate of $15,742
in the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to an average daily TCE rate of $16,105 in the year
ended December 31, 2009.
VOYAGE EXPENSES AND COMMISSIONS Voyage expenses, which include bunkers, cargo expenses,
port expenses, port agency fees, tugs, extra insurance and various expenses, were $1,887 for the
year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $1,394 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
variance in voyage expenses is due to (i) the higher bunker consumption due to increased
consumption during off-hire and idle days, (ii) higher port expenses and (iii) the increased cargo
inspection expenses due to the increased discharging of cargo in South and West African ports. For
the year ended December 31, 2010, commissions charged amounted to $3,357 as compared to $3,089 for
the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in commissions is mainly due to the small increase
of operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31,
2009 and a slightly higher average commission of 5.8% over total operating revenues for the year
ended December 31, 2010 versus an average commission of 5.4% over total operating revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The commission fees represent commissions paid to the Manager, other
affiliated companies associated with family members of our CEO, and unaffiliated third parties
relating to vessels chartered during the relevant periods. For the year ended December 31, 2010,
commissions paid to the Manager equal 1.25% of gross hire or freight for vessels, which in turn
pays 1.25% of gross hire and freight to Safbulk.
OPERATING EXPENSES Vessel operating expenses, which include crew cost, provisions, deck and
engine stores, lubricating oil, insurance, maintenance and repairs, totaled $18,607 in the year
ended December 31, 2010 as compared to $17,813 in the year ended December 31, 2009. The slight
increase of $794, which is translated to daily operating expenses of $5,282 for the year ended
December 31, 2010 versus $5,218 for the year ended December 31, 2009 is mainly attributed to the
higher operating expenses incurred during vessels dry-dockings which amounted to four for the year
ended December 31, 2010 compared to three for the year ended December 31, 2009.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION For the year ended December 31, 2010, depreciation expense
totaled $15,365 as compared to $16,006 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease of $641
in depreciation expense resulted from the change in our depreciation policy as described below in
the Liquidity and Capital Resources section, from the classification of M/V Free Hero as held
for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets for the year ended December 31, 2010 and
the sale of M/V Free Destiny on August 27, 2010. The decrease was to some extent alleviated by the
increase of the average number of vessels to 9.65 in the year ended December 31, 2010 from 9.35 in
the year ended December 31, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2010, amortization of
dry-dockings and special survey costs totaled $1,888, an increase of $146 over the expenses
reported in the year ended December 31, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we amortized
eight vessels scheduled dry-dockings and special surveys versus six vessels scheduled dry-docking
and special surveys during the year ended December 31, 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, back-log assets amortization expense amounted
to $nil and $907, respectively, and is included in voyage revenue, as the recognized asset in
accordance with the acquisition of vessel the M/V Free Maverick has been fully amortized during
2009.
MANAGEMENT FEES Management fees for the year ended December 31, 2010 totaled $1,978, as
compared to $1,874 in the year ended December 31, 2009. The $104 increase in management fees
resulted from the increased average number of vessels under the technical management of the Manager
to 9.65 in the year ended December 31, 2010 from 9.35 in the year ended December 31, 2009 and the
higher monthly management fee since October 2009.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES General and administrative expenses, which include,
among other things, legal, audit, audit related expenses, travel expenses, communications expenses,
and services fees and expenses charged by the Manager, totaled $4,494 (including $559 stock-based
compensation expense) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to $4,156 (including $494
stock-based compensation expense) for the year ended December 31, 2009. The difference was
primarily due to the higher non-cash stock-based compensation costs and write-off of $184 of filing
expenses.
PROVISION AND WRITE-OFFS OF INSURANCE CLAIMS AND BAD DEBTS We agreed to settle the
insurance claim of the M/V Free Jupiter in exchange of a full and definite settlement with the
salvage company
49
involved in the incident and a cash payment of $530 to us. In accordance with the agreement,
we wrote off $986. The remaining balance of $264 mainly refers to write-offs of long outstanding
accounts receivable.
GAIN ON SALE OF VESSEL We recognized a gain of $807 on the sale of the M/V Free Destiny, a
1982-built 25,240 dwt Handysize dry bulk vessel, for a price of $3,213. The vessel was delivered to
the buyers on August 27, 2010.
VESSEL IMPAIRMENT LOSS In September 2010, we initiated negotiations with various unrelated
parties for the sale of the M/V Free Hero, the 1995 built 24,318 dwt Handysize dry bulk vessel.
Accordingly, she was classified as an asset held for sale, which resulted in an impairment loss
of $9,378 as the vessel was recorded at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to
sell. The effect of the suspension of the depreciation for the fourth quarter of 2010, as a result
of the classification of the M/V Free Hero as asset held for sale, was to increase net income for
the year ended December 31, 2010 by $409 or $0.06 per weighted average number of shares, both basic
and diluted. Due to our intention to proceed with the sales of the M/V Free Impala and M/V Free
Neptune, we performed an impairment test as of December 31, 2010 and concluded that no impairment
charge was required for the M/V Free Neptune. An impairment charge of $17,097 representing the
amount by which the carrying amount of the vessel M/V Free Impala exceeded her fair value was
recognized, which together with the associated deferred dry docking and special survey costs
amounting to $156 are reflected in Vessel impairment loss in the consolidated statement of
operations.
FINANCING COSTS Financing costs amounted to $4,375 in the year ended December 31, 2010, and
$4,323 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase of $52 was mainly due to the increased
weighted average interest rate to 3.0% during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2.5% in
the year ended December 31, 2009, and the commitment fees of $171 incurred in relation to the offer
letter signed for the financing of the vessels under construction. The increase was partly
counterbalanced by the decrease in amortization of deferred financing fees by $134 in the year
ended December 31, 2010.
GAIN /(LOSS) ON INTEREST RATE SWAPS Under the terms of the two swap agreements, we make
quarterly payments to the counterparty based on decreasing notional amounts, standing at $7,646 and
$4,093 as of December 31, 2010 at fixed rates of 5.07% and 5.55% respectively, and the counterparty
makes quarterly floating-rate payments of 3-month LIBOR to us based on the same decreasing notional
amounts. The swaps mature in September 2015 and July 2015, respectively.
The gain (loss) on our two interest rate swaps, which is reflected in the consolidated
statements of operations comprises of a realized loss of $594 and an unrealized gain of $129, and a
realized loss of $671 and an unrealized gain of $560 for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The change is attributable to the interest rate differential between floating and
fixed interest rates during 2010. We use interest rate swaps to manage net exposure to interest
rate fluctuations related to its borrowings.
NET LOSS Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $21,821 as compared to $6,859
net income for the year ended December 31, 2009. The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010
resulted primarily from the charge of the following extraordinary non-cash items during 2010: (i)
an impairment loss of $26,631 of which $17,253 relates to the M/V Free Impala and $9,378 to the M/V
Free Hero, (ii) the write-off of $986 that related to the full and final settlement of the M/V Free
Jupiter insurance claim and (iii) the gain of $807 from the sale of M/V Free Destiny. After the
elimination of these items, net income for the year ended December 31, 2010 would total to $4,989
as compared to $6,859 in the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in net income resulted
primarily from higher operating and voyage expenses, as well as general and administrative
expenses, as explained above, which were only partially, offset by increased operating revenues and
lower depreciation and amortization expenses.
Year Ended December 31, 2009 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
REVENUES Operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $57,533 compared to
$66,689 generated during the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease of $9,156 is primarily
attributable to a weaker charter market environment in the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to
the year ended December 31, 2008, which was not counterbalanced by the increase of average number
of vessels to 9.35 in the year ended December 31, 2009 from 7.36 in the year ended December 31,
2008.
50
VOYAGE EXPENSES AND COMMISSIONS Voyage expenses, which include bunkers, cargo expenses,
port expenses, port agency fees, tugs, extra insurance and various expenses, were $1,394 for the
year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $527 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Seven of
our vessels were chartered in the spot market under short term time charters during the year ended
December 31, 2009. The variation in voyage expenses reflects mainly the bunkers delivery -
redelivery operations during 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, commissions charged amounted to $3,089 as compared to
$3,383 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The commission fees represent commissions paid to
Safbulk through the Manager, as well as, other affiliated and unaffiliated third parties relating
to vessels chartered during the relevant periods. Commissions paid to the Manager equal 1.25% of
gross hire or freight for vessels, which in turn pays 1.25% of gross hire and freight to Safbulk.
OPERATING EXPENSES Vessel operating expenses, which include crew cost, provisions, deck and
engine stores, lubricating oil, insurance, maintenance and repairs, totaled $17,813 in the year
ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $16,354 in the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase
of $1,459 in vessel operating expenses is a result of the increase of the average number of vessels
owned to 9.35 during the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 7.36 during the year ended
December 31, 2008. The daily vessel operating expenses per vessel owned, however, were $5,218 for
the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $6,084 for the year ended December 31, 2008, a
decrease of 14.2%. This decrease was due to the better monitoring of vessel operating expenses and
the more efficient operation of our vessels as well as deflationary pressures on wages, lubricant
costs, and some categories of stores, spares and services.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION For the year ended December 31, 2009, depreciation expense
totaled $16,006 as compared to $13,349 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in
depreciation expense resulted from the growth of our fleet to an average of 9.35 for the year ended
December 31, 2009 from an average of 7.36 for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the related
investment in fixed assets. This increase in depreciation expense has been mitigated by the change
in our depreciation policy as described below. For the year ended December 31, 2009, amortization
of dry-dockings and special survey costs totaled $1,742 an increase of $954 over the expenses
reported in the year ended December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we amortized
five vessels scheduled dry-dockings and special surveys versus four vessels scheduled dry-docking
and special surveys in the year ended December 31, 2008. As a result, amortization of deferred
dry-dockings and special survey costs increased for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Effective April 1, 2009, and following our reassessment of the useful lives of our assets, our
vessels useful life was increased from 27 to 28 years. Our estimate was based on the current
vessels operating condition and the conditions prevailing in the market for same type of vessels.
The effect of this change in accounting estimate, which did not require retrospective adoption as
per ASC 250 Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, was to increase net income for the year
ended December 31, 2009 by $1,088 or $0.21 per weighted average number of share, both basic and
diluted.
For the year ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, back-log assets amortization
expense amounted to $907 and $899, respectively, and is included in voyage revenue.
MANAGEMENT FEES Management fees for the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled $1,874, as
compared to $2,634 for the year ended December 31, 2008, which included $1,655 of management fees,
$300 office renovation expenses and $679 for service fees. The increase in management fees from
$1,655 to $1,874 resulted from the fees charged in connection with the increased number of vessels
under the technical management by the Manager and the increase of monthly technical management fee
to $16.5 per vessel from $15 per vessel, effective since October 2009. For the year ended December
31, 2009, service fees were classified as general and administrative expenses.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES General and administrative expenses, which include,
among other things, legal, audit, audit related expenses, international safety code compliance
expenses, travel expenses, communications expenses, and services fees charged by the Manager,
totaled $4,156 (including $494 stock-based compensation expense) for the year ended December 31,
2009 as compared to $2,863 (including $107 stock-based compensation expense) for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The difference was primarily due to the change of the classification of services
fees from management fees to general and administrative
51
expenses. Stock-based compensation costs reflect non-cash, equity-based compensation granted
in the form of stock options and restricted shares.
FINANCING COSTS Financing costs amounted to $4,323 in the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $6,453 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease of $2,130 is mainly the
result of the reduced interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the lower principal
balances of our bank loans outstanding in the year ended December 31, 2009. Our financing costs
represent primarily the amortized financing fees in connection with the bank loans used for the
acquisition of our vessels and the write-off of unamortized financing fees. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, we expensed the unamortized financing fees of $111. The $111 unamortized
financing fees relate to the financing fees of $163 incurred for the loan of $26,250 from First
Business Bank, or FBB, we obtained during 2008, to partially finance the acquisition of the M/V
Free Impala. On December 15, 2009, we entered an agreement for a new secured term loan of $27,750
from FBB to refinance its existing loan with FBB.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we expensed the unamortized financing fees of $639 in
comparison with related expenses incurred for the year ended December 31, 2007 of $2,570. The $639
unamortized financing fees were expensed in 2008 as a result of the refinancing of the HSH Nordbank
AG loan facility with a new credit facility from Credit Suisse.
The amortization of financing fees for the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled $345 or a
decrease of $8 over the amortized expenses reported in the year ended December 31, 2008.
LOSS ON DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS Under the terms of the two swap agreements, we make
quarterly payments to the counterparty based on decreasing notional amounts, standing at $9,299 and
$4,978 as of December 31, 2009 at fixed rates of 5.07% and 5.55% respectively, and the counterparty
makes quarterly floating-rate payments at LIBOR to us based on the same decreasing notional
amounts. The swaps mature in September 2015 and July 2015, respectively. There were no further
interest rate swap agreements concluded in the year ended December 31, 2009 and in the year ended
December 31, 2008.
The loss on our two interest rate swaps, which is separately reflected in the consolidated
statements of operations comprises of a realized loss of $671 and an unrealized gain of $560, and a
realized loss of $395 and an unrealized loss of $1,061 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
NET INCOME Net income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $6,859 as compared to
$19,192 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The substantial decrease in net income for 2009
resulted primarily from the weaker freight market compared to the same period last year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have historically financed our capital requirements from equity provided by our
shareholders, operating cash flows and long-term borrowings. As of March 28, 2011, our long-term
borrowings totaled $116,871, of which $23,234 is the current portion. We have primarily used our
funds for capital expenditures to acquire and maintain our fleet, comply with international
shipping standards and environmental laws and regulations, fund working capital requirements, make
principal repayments on outstanding loan facilities, and payment of dividends. We expect to
continue to rely upon operating cash flows, long-term borrowings, and the working capital available
to us, as well as possible future equity financings, to fund our future operations and possible
growth. In addition, to the extent that the options and warrants currently issued are subsequently
exercised, the proceeds from those exercises would provide us with additional funds. In 2009, we
suspended the payment of cash dividends on our common stock because of prevailing economic
conditions and to comply with restrictions in certain of our loan agreements. Because economic
conditions remain uncertain, and because we are focusing on the renewal of our fleet, we have
determined not to resume the payment of cash dividends at this time.
The dry bulk carriers we owned had an average age of approximately 14.16 years as of December
31, 2010. Effective April 1, 2009, and following our reassessment of the useful lives of our
assets, the vessels useful life was increased from 27 to 28 years. Our estimate was based on the
current vessels operating condition and the conditions prevailing in the market for same type of
vessels. However, economics, rather than a set number of years, determines the actual useful life
of a vessel. As a vessel ages, the maintenance costs rise particularly with respect to
52
the cost of surveys. So long as the revenue generated by the vessel sufficiently exceeds its
maintenance costs, the vessel will remain in use. If the revenue generated or expected future
revenue does not sufficiently exceed the maintenance costs, or if the maintenance costs exceed the
revenue generated or expected future revenue, then the vessel owner usually sells the vessel for
scrap.
At
December 31, 2010, our current liabilities exceeded our current
assets by $2,128, ($7,363 at December 31, 2009). In addition, and as further discussed under Summary of Contractual
Obligations below, we have entered into two newbuilding contracts with a Chinese shipyard for the
construction of two Handysize drybulk vessels of approximately 33,600 dwt each, for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $48,800 (excluding extra costs of approximately $920). The expected
short term capital commitments to fund the construction installments under the shipbuilding
contracts in 2011 amount to $4,880. We expect to use operating cash flows and the proceeds of the
sale of vessels to pay the construction installments under the shipbuilding contracts until we take
delivery of the vessels in the second and third quarters of 2012. Cash expected to be generated
from the operations assuming that current market charter hire rates would prevail in 2011, may not
be sufficient to cover our ongoing working capital requirements and
capital commitments, or for us to be in compliance with certain
covenants contained in our loan agreements. We are currently
exploring several alternatives aiming to manage our working capital requirements and other
commitments in the event of current market charter hire rates will
continue including a plan for a share capital increase, disposition
of certain vessels in our current fleet as more fully described in Vessel Impairment Loss and
Results of Operations sections, and seek to achieve
additional reductions in operating and other costs.
We believe that the above plans will be sufficient to cover our working capital needs for a
reasonable period of time.
Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2010 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net cash from operating activities decreased by $589 to $20,802 for
the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $21,391 of net cash from operating activities for
the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease resulted from higher operating, voyage, general and
administrative expenses in the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31,
2009.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December
31, 2010 was $2,819 as compared to $11,302 for the year ended December 31, 2009. This decrease
reflected primarily the expenditures for the construction of Hull 1 and Hull 2 and the net cash
sale proceeds of $2,846 from the sale of M/V Free Destiny in the year ended December 31, 2010 as
compared to the acquisition of M/V Free Neptune in the year ended December 31, 2009 for a total
cost of $11,302.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES The cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31,
2010 was $20,630 as compared to $7,126 used in the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in
cash used in financing activities was due to the following cash movements:(i) scheduled repayment
of bank loans of $14,800, (ii) a $2,700 prepayment on November 1, 2010 for the Deutsche Bank
Nederland facility as a result of the sale of vessel M/V Free Destiny and (iii) an increase in
restricted cash of $3,130 attributed to the pledged deposit to ABN AMRO in respect of the guarantee
provided for the second installment of the two newbuildings, counterbalanced by the closing of the
retention accounts with Credit Suisse due to the end of the waiver period relating to covenant
breaches as of December 31, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the cash used in financing
activities mainly consisted of: (i) scheduled repayments of bank loans of $21,700 and (ii)
prepayment of $6,691 in total. For 2009, the cash provided from financing activities consisted of:
(i) $16,244 proceeds from the follow-on equity offering and (ii) $6,000 from the FBB facility. The
significant reduction of scheduled bank loan repayments for the year ended December 31, 2010 is due
to: (i) $500 reduction in the repayment of the Credit Suisse facility, (ii) $5,400 reduction in the
repayment of the Deutsche Bank Nederland facility and (iii) $1,000 reduction in the repayment of
the FBB facility. These reductions are mainly due to the amended repayment schedules for the loans
resulting from refinancing of existing loans with FBB and Deutsche Bank Nederland.
53
Year Ended December 31, 2009 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net cash from operating activities decreased by $11,172 to $21,391 for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $32,563 of net cash from operating activities in
the year ended December 31, 2008. This is attributable to the weaker freight market in the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December
31, 2009 was $11,302 as compared to $182,539 for the year ended December 31, 2008. We agreed to
purchase on August 5, 2009 the M/V Free Neptune from an unaffiliated third party for approximately
$11,000 and related purchase costs of $302. The $182,539 in net cash used in investing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2008 were associated with the acquisition of the M/V Free Knight
on March 19, 2008 for the purchase price of $39,250 and related purchase costs of $400, with the
acquisition of the M/V Free Impala on April 2, 2008 for the purchase price of $37,500 and related
purchase costs of $420, with the acquisition of the M/V Free Lady on July 7, 2008 for a cash
purchase price $65,200 and related purchase costs of $157 and with the acquisition of the M/V Free
Maverick on September 1, 2008 for the cash purchase price of $39,600 and related purchase costs of
$12.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES The cash used in financing activities during the year ended December
31, 2009 was $7,126 as compared to cash provided from financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2008 amounting to $89,960. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we received $6,000
additional liquidity as a result of a new secured term loan of $27,750 with FBB to refinance our
then-existing loan of $21,750 on the M/V Free Impala, while we repaid $28,391 of loan principal.
On July 28, 2009, we completed a registered offering of 10,041,151 shares of common stock (adjusted
to 2,008,230 to reflect the reverse stock split), which included 1,309,715 shares (adjusted to
261,943 to reflect the reverse stock split) issued pursuant to the underwriters over-allotment
option. The offering resulted in net proceeds of $16,244, after deducting underwriting fees and
offering expenses. Proceeds from the offering were used primarily for the acquisition of the
drybulk vessel M/V Free Neptune, for general working capital purposes, and an amount equal to
$1,691 was applied against the outstanding loan balance with Deutsche Bank Nederland as discussed
in the section Long-Term Debt below. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we obtained and
utilized the proceeds from the Deutsche Bank Nederland loan facilities, the proceeds from the FBB
loan facility, and the proceeds from the Credit Suisse loan facility Tranche B for the purchase of
the M/V Free Knight and the M/V Free Maverick, the purchase of the M/V Free Impala, and the
purchase of the M/V Free Lady, respectively.
Long-Term Debt
We and our subsidiaries have obtained financing from affiliated and unaffiliated lenders for
its vessels.
All of our credit facilities bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin, ranging from 2.25% to
4.25%, and are secured by mortgages on the financed vessels and assignments of vessels earnings
and insurance coverage proceeds. They also include affirmative and negative financial covenants of
the borrowers (the respective vessel owning subsidiaries), including maintenance of operating
accounts, minimum cash deposits, average cash balances to be maintained with the lending banks (at
group level) and minimum ratios for the fair values of the collateral vessels compared to the
outstanding loan balances. Each borrower is restricted under its respective loan agreement from
incurring additional indebtedness, changing the vessels flag without the lenders consent or
distributing earnings.
The weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009 was 3.0% and 2.5%, respectively. Interest expense incurred under the above loan
agreements amounted to $3,932 (net of capitalized interest $43) and $3,708 for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009, respectively, and is included in Interest
and Finance Costs in the consolidated statements of operations.
Our remaining undrawn availability commitment is related to the Deutsche Bank Nederland
overdraft facility commitment as of December 31, 2010 amounted to $125. In addition, we have
available a commitment of up to $32,400 for the newbuildings as discussed below.
54
On September 10, 2010, we signed an offer letter with ABN AMRO Bank securing, subject to
customary legal documentation, commitments for pre-delivery and post-delivery debt financing up to
an amount of $32,400 for the construction of two handysize vessels.
The facility, that will be available for drawdown up to December 31, 2012, is repayable in 20
quarterly installments plus a balloon payable along with the last installments, commencing three
months after the delivery of the vessels. The vessels will be used as collateral against the
facility.
According to the agreed terms, the facility will bear interest at LIBOR plus margin and will
include customary financial covenants; an arrangement fee will be paid upon signing of the
agreement and commitment fees on the undrawn portion of the facility are paid, commencing on the
signing of the offer letter. We have incurred commitment fees of $171 for the year ended December
31, 2010, included in the consolidated statements of operations in Interest and Finance Costs.
On October 4, 2010 ABN AMRO issued letters of guarantee in favor of the Chinese yard covering
the second installment for the vessels under construction, amounting to $2,440 for each vessel. On
the same date, we entered into a bank guarantee facility agreement for the issuance of the above
mentioned letter of guarantees. The letters of guarantee mature on the earliest between the date of
the payment of the second installment and November 30, 2011. In this respect we have deposited an
amount equal to the second installment for the vessels under construction on a pledged account with
ABN AMRO and is included in the Restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheet.
On November 1, 2010, we paid an amount of $2,700 constituting prepayment towards Deutsche Bank
Nederland loan facility due to the sale of M/V Free Destiny. According to the loan terms, the
following three installments will be reduced to nil and the installment falling on November 1, 2011
will be reduced to $300. The remaining repayment schedule remains unchanged.
Loan Covenants
As of December 31, 2010, our loan agreements contain various financial covenants as follows:
|
|
a) |
|
Credit Suisse loan agreement: (i) we should maintain minimum cash balances of
$375 for each of our vessels covered by the loan agreement; (ii) the aggregate fair
market value of the financed vessels must not be less than 135% of the outstanding loan
balance and the swap exposure, which has been waived to 115% until April 1, 2011, at
which time the aggregate fair market value of the financed vessels again must not be
less than 135% of the outstanding loan balance. |
|
|
|
|
b) |
|
FBB loan agreement: (i) we should maintain an average corporate liquidity of at
least $3,000; (ii) the leverage ratio of the corporate guarantor shall not at any time
exceed 55%; (iii) the ratio of EBITDA to net interest expense shall not be less than 3;
iv) the fair market value of the financed vessels shall be at least (a) 115% for the
period July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 and (b) 125% thereafter. |
|
|
|
|
c) |
|
Deutsche Bank Nederland loan agreement: (i) the interest coverage ratio shall
not be less than 3 until December 31, 2010 and thereafter to be reset by Deutsche Bank
Nederland, in its reasonable discretion in consultation with us; (ii) the debt service
coverage ratio shall not be less than 1.00 until December 31, 2010 and thereafter to be
reset by Deutsche Bank Nederland, in its reasonable discretion in consultation with us;
(iii) the gearing ratio shall not exceed 2.5; (iv) the outstanding loan balance shall
not be more than a ratio of the fair market value of the financed vessels as follows:
(a) 100% from July 1, 2010 until and including June 30, 2011, (b) 110% from July 1,
2011 until and including June 30, 2012, (c) 120% from July 1, 2012 until and including
December 30, 2012 and (d) 125% from December 31, 2012 onwards. |
|
In the event of non-compliance with the covenants prescribed in the loan agreements, including
the result of a sharp decline in the market value of our vessels, such non-compliance would
constitute a potential event of default in the absence of available additional assets or cash to
secure our debt and bring us into compliance with the debt covenants, and could result in the
lenders requiring immediate payment of the loans.
55
As of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all of the loan covenants and the debt
continues to be classified as long-term, except for (i) the principal payments falling due in the
next 12 months and (ii) the estimated portion of the Credit Suisse loan balance relating to the M/V
Free Hero amounting to $8,760 as a result of the intended sale of the vessel.
There can be no assurances, however, that if current market conditions further deteriorate we
will remain in compliance with our loan covenants. In the event of potential non-compliance with
such debt covenants in the future there can be no assurances that our lenders will provide waivers
or forbearances.
As of December 31, 2010, the following repayments of principal are required over the next five
years and throughout their term for our debt facilities:
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt repayment due by period* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to 1 |
|
|
1 3 |
|
|
3 5 |
|
|
More than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
Deutsche Bank
Nederland |
|
$ |
34,459 |
|
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
|
$ |
25,409 |
|
|
$ |
5,750 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Credit Suisse |
|
|
60,250 |
|
|
|
16,372 |
|
|
|
12,896 |
|
|
|
17,707 |
|
|
|
13,275 |
|
FBB |
|
|
25,750 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2010 |
|
$ |
120,459 |
|
|
$ |
23,022 |
|
|
$ |
45,005 |
|
|
$ |
30,157 |
|
|
$ |
22,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Excluding the principal repayments for Hull 1 and Hull 2. |
Summary of Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and their maturity dates as of
December 31, 2010:
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
120,459 |
|
|
$ |
23,022 |
|
|
$ |
45,005 |
|
|
$ |
30,157 |
|
|
$ |
22,275 |
|
Interest on variable-rate debt |
|
|
12,151 |
|
|
|
3,453 |
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
|
|
3,342 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Yard construction installments |
|
|
44,840 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
39,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services fees to the Manager |
|
|
11,021 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
3,911 |
|
Management fees to the Manager |
|
|
34,515 |
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
|
3,564 |
|
|
|
25,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligations |
|
$ |
222,986 |
|
|
$ |
34,970 |
|
|
$ |
96,432 |
|
|
$ |
39,907 |
|
|
$ |
51,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above table does not include our share of the monthly rental expenses for our offices of
approximately Euro 10.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2010, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item
303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risk
Interest Rate Fluctuation
The international drybulk industry is a capital-intensive industry, requiring significant
amounts of investment. Much of this investment is provided in the form of long-term debt. Our debt
usually contains interest
56
rates that fluctuate with LIBOR. Increasing interest rates could adversely impact future
earnings. To mitigate this risk, we have entered into two interest rate swap contracts.
Our interest expense is affected by changes in the general level of interest rates. As an
indication of the extent of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, an increase of 100 basis
points would have decreased our net income and cash flows in the 2011 fiscal year by approximately
$1,126 based upon our debt level during the period in 2010 during which we had debt outstanding.
The following table sets forth for a period of five years the sensitivity of the loans on each
of the vessels owned by us during fiscal 2010 in U.S. dollars to a 100-basis-point increase in
LIBOR.
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Name |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
Free Hero / Free Goddess / Free Jupiter |
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
Free Impala / Free Neptune |
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
Free Knight |
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Free Lady |
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
Free Maverick |
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Please see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Long Term Debt for a full description of each of these loans.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with its variable rate borrowings, and its
objective is to manage the impact of such fluctuations on earnings and cash flows of its
borrowings. In this respect, we use interest rate swaps to manage net exposure to interest rate
fluctuations related to its borrowings and to lower its overall borrowing costs. We have two
interest rate swaps outstanding with a total notional amount of $11,739 as of December 31, 2010.
These interest rate swap agreements do not qualify for hedge accounting, and changes in their fair
values are reflected in our earnings.
Our derivative financial instruments are valued using pricing models that are used to value
similar instruments by market participants. Where possible, we verify the values produced by our
pricing models to market prices. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, including
contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit spreads, measures of volatility and
correlations of such inputs. Model inputs can generally be verified and do not involve significant
management judgment. Such instruments are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
We generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars, but incur a portion of our expenses in
currencies other than U.S. dollars. For accounting purposes, expenses incurred in Euros are
converted into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the date of each transaction. At
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, approximately 55%, 21% and 21%, respectively, of our outstanding
accounts payable was denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar (mainly in the Euro). As
an indication of the extent of our sensitivity to foreign exchange rate changes, an increase of an
additional 10% in the value of other currencies against the dollar would have decreased our net
income and cash flows in 2010 by approximately $263 based upon the accounts payable we had
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2010.
Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit
risk, consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, insurance claims
and derivative contracts (interest rate swaps). We place our cash and cash equivalents, consisting
mostly of deposits, with high credit qualified financial institutions.
57
We monitor the credit risk regarding charterers turnover in order to review its reliance on
individual charterers. We do not obtain rights to collateral to reduce its credit risk. We are
exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by counter parties to derivative
instruments; however, we limit our exposure by diversifying among counter parties with high credit
ratings. In addition, the counterparty to the derivative financial instrument is a major financial
institution in order to manage exposure to non-performance counterparties.
Charter Market Risk
Our revenues, earnings and profitability are affected by the prevailing charter market rates.
During the first quarter of 2011, the BDI fluctuated from 1,693 where it stood on the first trading
day of January 2011 to a low of 1,043 on February 4, 2011. Since then, the BDI has recovered to
1,538 on March 10, 2011. Such chartering market volatility is expected to adversely impact our
financial performance for the relevant quarter including its net income and cashflow.
M/V Free Jupiter was on time charter with KLC from June 8, 2007 until she was re-delivered to
us on February 22, 2011. KLC has made several unilateral deductions from hire payments during the
three-year course of the time charter, and no hire has been received from KLC from February 8, 2011
until the scheduled and actual redelivery of the vessel on February 22, 2011. We have commenced
arbitration proceedings against KLC, and have taken action to obtain security, including the arrest
of KLC assets. As a result, we have obtained third-party security in the amount of $1,680 (which
includes provision for interest and legal costs) in the form of a letter of undertaking from KLCs
P&I club covering KLCs unilateral deductions from the hire. We have also obtained cash security
held in escrow in the amount of $159 from the execution of a lien on sub-hires. We believe that we
have grounds to recover the above-described secured portion of our claim, although there can be no
assurances that we will be able to do so. In addition, due to the uncertainties surrounding the
possibility of recovering unsecured portion of the hire obligations due from KLC to us, management
has determined that it will not recognize as income in the relevant quarter such unsecured amounts,
which total approximately $320. On January 25, 2011 KLC announced that it had filed a petition for
the rehabilitation proceeding for court receivership in the Seoul Central District Court, and the
court had issued a preservation order.
58
OUR BUSINESS
Overview
We are an international drybulk shipping company incorporated under the laws of the Republic
of the Marshall Islands with principal executive offices in Piraeus, Greece. We were incorporated
on April 23, 2004 under the name Adventure Holdings S.A. to serve as the parent holding company of
our ship-owning subsidiaries. On April 27, 2005, we changed our name to FreeSeas Inc. We became a
public reporting company on December 15, 2005, when we completed a merger with Trinity, a blank
check company formed to serve as a vehicle to complete a business combination with an operating
business, in which we were the surviving corporation. At the time of the merger we owned three
drybulk carriers. Our fleet consists of seven Handysize vessels and two Handymax vessels that
carry a variety of drybulk commodities, including iron ore, grain and coal, which are referred to
as major bulks, as well as bauxite, phosphate, fertilizers, steel products, cement, sugar and
rice, or minor bulks. Additionally, we entered into contracts to purchase two newbuilding
Handysize bulk carriers, of approximately 33,600 dwt each, with a Chinese shipyard. These new
vessels are scheduled for delivery in the second and third quarter of 2012. As of December 31,
2010, the aggregate dwt of our fleet is approximately 274,000 dwt and the average age of our fleet
is approximately 14.16 years.
We are currently focusing on the Handysize and Handymax sectors, which we believe are more
versatile in the types of cargoes that they can carry and trade routes they can follow, and offer
less volatile returns than larger vessel classes. We may, however, acquire larger drybulk vessels
if appropriate opportunities present themselves.
We have contracted the management of our fleet to our Manager, a company owned by Ion G.
Varouxakis, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. Our Manager provides technical
management of our fleet, accounting services and office space and has subcontracted the charter and
post-charter management of our fleet to Safbulk, a company controlled by the Restis family. While
Safbulk is responsible for finding and arranging charters for our vessels, the final decision to
charter our vessels remains with us.
Our Fleet
The following table presents our fleet information as of March 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Name |
|
Type |
|
Built |
|
Dwt |
|
Employment |
M/V Free Lady |
|
Handymax |
|
2003 |
|
|
50,246 |
|
|
About 3-5 month time charter at $14,000 per day for the first 120 days and $15,500 for the balance period through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Jupiter |
|
Handymax |
|
2002 |
|
|
47,777 |
|
|
About 65 day time charter trip at $6,750 per day and $13,000 for any day in excess of 80 days through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Knight |
|
Handysize |
|
1998 |
|
|
24,111 |
|
|
80 day time charter trip at $10,000 per day through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Maverick |
|
Handysize |
|
1998 |
|
|
23,994 |
|
|
About 62 day time charter trip at $9,100 per day through May 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Impala |
|
Handysize |
|
1997 |
|
|
24,111 |
|
|
25 day time charter trip at $13,000 per day through April 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Neptune |
|
Handysize |
|
1996 |
|
|
30,838 |
|
|
4-6 months time charter at $14,000 per day for the first 115 days and $15,250 thereafter, through April/July 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Hero |
|
Handysize |
|
1995 |
|
|
24,318 |
|
|
20-25 day time charter trip at $13,250 per day through April 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Goddess |
|
Handysize |
|
1995 |
|
|
22,051 |
|
|
25 day time charter trip at $12,500
per day through March/April 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/V Free Envoy |
|
Handysize |
|
1984 |
|
|
26,318 |
|
|
35-40 day time charter trip at
$8,250 per day through April 2011 |
59
We are taking steps to renew our fleet and, in that regard, we have initiated a plan to sell
the M/V Free Impala, the M/V Free Neptune and the M/V Free Hero. In addition, we may determine to
sell one of our other vessels, such as the M/V Free Envoy, our oldest vessel. There can be no
assurances that we will be able to obtain prices that are acceptable to us or that we will
otherwise be able to negotiate satisfactory terms of sale.
All of our vessels have been provided as collateral to secure the bank loans discussed in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Long Term
Debt.
The global drybulk carrier fleet is divided into four categories based on a vessels carrying
capacity. These categories are:
|
|
|
Capesize. Capesize vessels have a carrying capacity of 80,000 dwt. and above. Only
the largest ports around the world possess the infrastructure to accommodate vessels of this
size. Capesize vessels are primarily used to transport iron ore or coal and, to a much lesser
extent, grains, primarily on long-haul routes. |
|
|
|
|
Panamax. Panamax vessels have a carrying capacity of between 60,000 and 79,999
dwt. These vessels are designed to meet the physical restrictions of the Panama Canal
locks (hence their name Panamax the largest vessels able to transit the Panama
Canal, making them more versatile than larger vessels). These vessels carry coal,
grains, and, to a lesser extent, minerals such as bauxite/alumina and phosphate rock.
As the availability of capesize vessels has dwindled, panamaxes have also been used to
haul iron ore cargoes. |
|
|
|
|
Handymax. Handymax vessels have a carrying capacity of between 40,000 and
59,999 dwt. These vessels operate on a large number of geographically dispersed global
trade routes, carrying primarily grains and minor bulks. The standard vessels are
usually built with 25-30 ton cargo gear, enabling them to discharge cargo where grabs
are required (particularly industrial minerals), and to conduct cargo operations in
countries and ports with limited infrastructure. This type of vessel offers good
trading flexibility and can therefore be used in a wide variety of bulk and neobulk
trades, such as steel products. |
|
|
|
|
Handysize. Handysize vessels have a carrying capacity of up to 39,999 dwt.
These vessels are almost exclusively carrying minor bulk cargo. Increasingly, vessels
of this type operate on regional trading routes, and may serve as trans-shipment
feeders for larger vessels. Handysize vessels are well suited for small ports with
length and draft restrictions. Their cargo gear enables them to service ports lacking
the infrastructure for cargo loading and unloading. |
The supply of drybulk carriers is dependent on the delivery of new vessels and the removal of
vessels from the global fleet. The demand for drybulk carrier capacity is determined by the
underlying demand for commodities transported in drybulk carriers which in turn is influenced by
trends in the global economy.
Vessel Employment
We have employed and continue to employ our vessels in the spot charter market, under trip
time charters and period time charters.
A trip time charter is a short-term time charter for a voyage between load port(s) and
discharge port(s) under which the charterer pays fixed daily hire rate on a semi-monthly basis for
use of the vessel. A period time charter is charter for a vessel for a fixed period of time at a
set daily rate. Under trip time charters and time charters, the charterer pays voyage expenses.
Under all three types of charters, the vessel owners pay for vessel operating expenses, which
include crew costs, provisions, deck and engine stores, lubricating oil, insurance, maintenance and
repairs. The vessel owners are also responsible for each vessels dry-docking and intermediate and
special survey costs. Lastly, vessels can be chartered under bareboat contracts whereby the
charterer is responsible for the vessels maintenance and operations, as well as all voyage
expenses.
Vessels operating on period time charter provide more predictable cash flows, but can yield
lower profit margins than vessels operating in the spot market during periods characterized by
favorable market conditions. Vessels operating in the spot market generate revenues that are less
predictable but may enable us to increase profit
60
margins during periods of increasing drybulk charter rates. However, we would then be exposed
to the risk of declining drybulk charter rates, which may be higher or lower than the rates at
which we chartered our vessels. We are constantly evaluating opportunities for period time
charters, but only expect to enter into additional period time charters if we can obtain contract
terms that satisfy our criteria.
Although we have not previously done so, we may from time to time utilize forward freight
agreements that enable us to enter into contractual obligations to sell the spot charter forward
and thereby reduce our exposure to a potential deterioration of the charter market.
Customers
During 2010, we derived approximately 42% of our gross revenues from three charterers, and
during 2009, we derived approximately 55% of our gross revenues from two charterers. We believe
that our customer base is composed of established charterers.
Management of Operations and Fleet
Pursuant to our amended and restated services agreement with our Manager, our operations are
executed and supervised by our Manager, based on the strategy devised by the board of directors and
subject to the approval of our board of directors as described below. We pay a monthly fee of
$118.5, (on the basis that the dollar/Euro exchange rate is 1.35 or lower; if on the last business
day of each month the dollar/Euro exchange rate exceeds 1.35 then the service fee payable will be
adjusted for the following month in question, so that the amount payable in dollars will be the
equivalent in Euro based on 1.35 dollar/Euro exchange rate) as compensation for services (described
below) related to accounting, financial reporting, implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley internal
control over financial reporting procedures and general administrative and management services. Our
Manager is entitled to a termination fee if the agreement is terminated upon a change of control
as defined in its services agreement with our Manager.
Our Manager provides us with the following services:
|
|
|
|
General Administration. Our Manager provides us with general
administrative, office and support services necessary for our
operations and our fleet, including technical and clerical personnel,
communication, accounting, and data processing services. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Accounting Services. Our Manager maintains our books,
records and accounts and provides all services as are necessary for
the preparation and maintenance of the our accounting records in
accordance with U.S. GAAP, preparing and filing financial statements
with the SEC and NASDAQ in accordance with applicable financial
reporting requirements, and developing, implementing, monitoring and
assessing our internal controls; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale and Purchase of Vessels. Our Manager advises our board of
directors when opportunities arise to purchase, including through
newbuildings, or to sell any vessels. All decisions to purchase or
sell vessels require the approval of our board of directors. Any
purchases or sales of vessels approved by our board of directors are
arranged and completed by our Manager. This involves the appointment
of superintendents to inspect and take delivery of vessels and to
monitor compliance with the terms and conditions of the purchase
contracts. |
|
We also contract the technical and commercial management of our vessels to our Manager. On
October 1, 2010, the subsidiaries Adventure Fourteen S.A. and Adventure Fifteen S.A. entered into
management agreements with our Manager for the provision of management services to Hull 1 and Hull
2. Our Manager has a separate management contract with each of our ship-owning subsidiaries and
provides a wide range of services on a fixed fee per vessel basis, as described below. These
services include vessel operations, maintenance, regulatory compliance, crewing, supervising
dry-docking and repairs, arranging insurance for vessels, vessel supplying, advising on the
purchase and sale of vessels, and performing certain accounting and other administrative services,
including financial reporting and internal controls requirements. Pursuant to our amended
management agreement with our Manager, we pay our Manager a monthly technical management fee of
$16.5 (on the basis that the dollar/Euro exchange rate is 1.30 or lower; if on the first business
day of each month the dollar/Euro exchange rate exceeds 1.30
61
then the management fee payable will be increased for the month in question, so that the
amount payable in dollars will be the equivalent in Euro based on 1.30 dollar/Euro exchange rate)
plus a fee of $0.4 per day for superintendant attendance and other direct expenses.
We also pay our Manager a fee equal to 1.25% of the gross freight or hire from the employment
of FreeSeas vessels and a 1% commission on the gross purchase price of any new vessel acquired or
the gross sale price of any vessel sold by FreeSeas with the assistance of our Manager.
Furthermore, our Manager has entered into an agreement with Safbulk, for the provision of charter
and post-charter services for our fleet. Additionally, we pay our Manager a monthly fee of $118.5
as compensation for services related to accounting, financial reporting, implementation of
Sarbanes-Oxley internal control over financial reporting procedures and general administrative and
management services plus expenses.
Our Manager currently manages all of our vessels and we anticipate that our Manager will
manage any additional vessels we may acquire in the future. Safbulk performs management services to
other international shipping entities, including the Restis group of companies.
We believe that we pay our Manager industry-standard fees for these services.
Crewing and Employees
We currently have no employees, our Manager is responsible for employing all of the executive
officers and staff to execute and supervise the operations. In addition, our Manager is responsible
for recruiting, either directly or through a crewing agent, the senior officers and all other crew
members for our vessels.
Charter Hire Rates
Charter hire rates fluctuate by varying degrees among drybulk carrier size categories. The
volume and pattern of trade in a small number of commodities (major bulks) affect demand for larger
vessels. Therefore, charter rates and vessel values of larger vessels often show greater
volatility. Conversely, trade in a greater number of commodities (minor bulks) drives demand for
smaller drybulk carriers. Accordingly, charter rates and vessel values for those vessels are
subject to less volatility.
Charter hire rates paid for drybulk carriers are primarily a function of the underlying
balance between vessel supply and demand, although at times other factors may play a role.
Furthermore, the pattern seen in charter rates is broadly mirrored across the different charter
types and the different drybulk carrier categories. However, because demand for larger drybulk
vessels is affected by the volume and pattern of trade in a relatively small number of commodities,
charter hire rates (and vessel values) of larger ships tend to be more volatile than those for
smaller vessels.
In the time charter market, rates vary depending on the length of the charter period and
vessel specific factors such as age, speed and fuel consumption.
In the voyage charter market, rates are influenced by cargo size, commodity, port dues and
canal transit fees, as well as commencement and termination regions. In general, a larger cargo
size is quoted at a lower rate per ton than a smaller cargo size. Routes with costly ports or
canals generally command higher rates than routes with low port dues and no canals to transit.
Voyages with a load port within a region that includes ports where vessels usually discharge cargo
or a discharge port within a region with ports where vessels load cargo also are generally quoted
at lower rates, because such voyages generally increase vessel utilization by reducing the unloaded
portion (or ballast leg) that is included in the calculation of the return charter to a loading
area.
Within the drybulk shipping industry, the charter hire rate references most likely to be
monitored are the freight rate indices issued by the Baltic Exchange. These references are based on
actual charter hire rates under charters entered into by market participants as well as daily
assessments provided to the Baltic Exchange by a panel of major shipbrokers.
62
Property
On February 5, 2007, we entered into an agreement with our Manager pursuant to which we agreed
to pay our Manager one-half of the rents due from our Manager to the lessor of our rented office
space, commencing on January 1, 2007. Beginning on January 1, 2008 and in conjunction with a
further expansion of our office space, we agreed to pay our Manager one half of the monthly rent
plus one half of the apportioned common expenses charged by the lessor. Reimbursement of rental and
common expenses continue on the same basis under our amended services agreement with our Manager.
Competition
We operate in markets that are highly competitive and based primarily on supply and demand.
Ownership of drybulk carriers is highly fragmented and is divided among approximately 1,400 drybulk
carrier owners. We compete for charters on the basis of price, vessel location, size, age and
condition of the vessel, as well as on our reputation. There are many drybulk shipping companies
which are publicly traded on the U.S. stock markets, such as DryShips Inc., Diana Shipping Inc.,
Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc., Euroseas Ltd., Excel Maritime Carriers Ltd. and Baltic Trading Limited,
which are significantly larger than we are and have substantially more capital, more and larger
vessels, personnel, revenue and profits and which are in competition with us. There is no assurance
that we can successfully compete with such companies for charters or other business.
Our Manager arranges our charters (whether spot charters, period time charters, bareboat
charters or pools) through the use of brokers, who negotiate the terms of the charters based on
market conditions. We compete with other owners of drybulk carriers in the, Handysize and Handymax
sectors. Charters for our vessels are negotiated by our Manager utilizing a worldwide network of
shipbrokers. These shipbrokers advise our Manager on a continuous basis of the availability of
cargo for any particular vessel. There may be several shipbrokers involved in any one charter. The
negotiation for a charter typically begins prior to the completion of the previous charter in order
to avoid any idle time. The terms of the charter are based on industry standards.
Seasonality
Coal, iron ore and grains, which are the major bulks of the drybulk shipping industry, are
somewhat seasonal in nature. The energy markets primarily affect the demand for coal, with
increases during hot summer periods when air conditioning and refrigeration require more
electricity and towards the end of the calendar year in anticipation of the forthcoming winter
period. The demand for iron ore tends to decline in the summer months because many of the major
steel users, such as automobile makers, reduce their level of production significantly during the
summer holidays. Grains are completely seasonal as they are driven by the harvest within a climate
zone. Because three of the five largest grain producers (the United States of America, Canada and
the European Union) are located in the northern hemisphere and the other two (Argentina and
Australia) are located in the southern hemisphere, harvests occur throughout the year and grains
required drybulk shipping accordingly.
Environmental and Other Regulations
Government regulation and laws significantly affects the ownership and operation of our
vessels. The vessels are subject to international conventions and treaties, national, state and
local laws and regulations in force in the countries in which our vessels may operate or are
registered, including those governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and
wastes, the cleanup of oil spills and other contamination, air emissions, and water discharges and
ballast water management.
A variety of governmental and private entities subject our vessels to both scheduled and
unscheduled inspections. These entities include the local port authorities (United States Coast
Guard, harbor master or equivalent), classification societies, flag state administration (country
of registry) and charterers. Certain of these entities require us to obtain permits, licenses,
financial assurances and certificates for the operation of our vessels. Failure to maintain
necessary permits or approvals could require us to incur substantial costs or result in the
temporary suspension of operation of one or more of our vessels.
We believe that the heightened level of environmental and quality concerns among insurance
underwriters, regulators and charterers is leading to greater inspection and safety requirements on
all vessels and may accelerate
63
the scrapping of older vessels throughout the industry. Increasing environmental concerns have
created a demand for vessels that conform to the stricter environmental standards. We are required
to maintain operating standards for all of our vessels that will emphasize operational safety,
quality maintenance, continuous training of its officers and crews and compliance with U.S. and
international regulations. We believe that the operation of our vessels is in substantial
compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations; however, because such laws and
regulations are frequently changed and may impose increasingly stricter requirements, such future
requirements may limit our ability to do business, increase our operating costs, force the early
retirement of our vessels, and/or affect their resale value, all of which could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
International Maritime Organization
The International Maritime Organization, or IMO, the United Nations agency for maritime safety
and the prevention of pollution by ships, has adopted the International Convention for the
Prevention of Marine Pollution, 1973, as modified by the related Protocol of 1978, or the MARPOL
Convention, which has been updated through various amendments. The MARPOL Convention establishes
environmental standards relating to oil leakage or spilling, garbage management, sewage, air
emissions, handling and disposal of noxious liquids and handling of harmful substances in packaged
forms. The IMO adopted regulations that set forth pollution prevention requirements applicable to
drybulk carriers. These regulations have been adopted by over 150 nations, including many of the
jurisdictions in which our vessels operate.
In September 1997, the IMO adopted Annex VI to the MARPOL Convention to address air pollution
from ships. Annex VI sets limits on sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from ship exhausts
and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons.
Annex VI also includes a global cap on the sulfur content of fuel oil and allows for special areas
to be established with more stringent controls on sulfur emissions. In October 2008, IMO adopted
amendments to Annex VI regarding particulate matter, nitrogen oxide, and sulfur oxide emission
standards that apply as of July 1, 2010. Among other things, the Annex VI amendments will
progressively reduce sulfur oxide emissions from ships, with the global sulfur cap reduced
initially to 3.50% (from the current 4.50%), effective from January 2012; then progressively to
0.50%, effective from January 2020. The limits applicable in Sulfur Emission Control Areas (SECAs)
will be reduced to 1.00%, beginning on July 2010 (from the current 1.50%); being further reduced to
0.10%, effective from January 2015. The United States ratified the Annex VI amendments in October
2008, thereby rendering its emission standards equivalent to IMO requirements. As a result, Annex
VI entered into force for the United States in January 2009. In March 2010, the IMO designated the
area extending 200 miles from the territorial sea baseline adjacent to the Atlantic/Gulf and
Pacific coasts of the United States and Canada, the main Hawaiian Islands, and the French
Territories of St. Pierre and Miquelon as an Emission Control Area. The new ECA will enter into
force in August 2011 and become legally enforceable in August 2012. New requirements associated
with the ECA may increase the cost of operation of our vessels in U.S. and Canadian waters. Other
ECAs may be designated, and the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate may adopt more stringent
emission standards independent of IMO. We believe we are in substantial compliance with current
Annex VI requirements, but we may incur costs to comply with the new standards in future years.
The operation of our vessels is also affected by the requirements set forth in the IMOs
Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and Pollution Prevention, or the ISM Code. The ISM
Code requires shipowners and bareboat charterers to develop and maintain an extensive Safety
Management System that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy
setting forth instructions and procedures for safe operation and describing procedures for dealing
with emergencies. The failure of a shipowner or management company to comply with the ISM Code may
subject such party to increased liability, may decrease available insurance coverage for the
affected vessels, and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports.
Currently, each of our vessels is ISM Code-certified. However, there can be no assurance that such
certification will be maintained indefinitely.
Additional or new conventions, laws and regulations may also be adopted that could adversely
affect our ability to operate our vessels.
64
The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990
The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, established an extensive regulatory and
liability regime for the protection and clean-up of the environment from oil spills. OPA affects
all owners and operators whose vessels trade in the United States, its territories and possessions
or whose vessels operate in waters of the United States, which includes the United States
territorial sea and its 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone. The United States has also
enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA, which
applies to the discharge of hazardous substances other than oil, whether on land or at sea. Both
OPA and CERCLA affect our operations.
Under OPA, vessel owners, operators, charterers and management companies are responsible
parties and are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the spill results solely from the
act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and removal
costs and other damages arising from discharges or threatened discharges of oil from their vessels,
including bunkers (fuel).
Effective July 31, 2009, the U.S. Coast Guard adjusted the limits of OPA liability for dry
bulk vessels to the greater of $1000 per gross ton or $854,400 and established a procedure for
adjusting the limits for inflation every three years. CERCLA contains a liability scheme that is
similar to that under the OPA, and liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per
gross ton or $5 million for vessels carrying a hazardous substance as cargo and the greater of $300
per gross ton or $0.5 million for any other vessel. These limits of liability do not apply if an
incident was directly caused by violation of applicable U.S. federal safety, construction or
operating regulations or by a responsible partys gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the
responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate and assist in connection
with oil removal activities. In response to the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico resulting
from the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, bills have been introduced in the U.S.
Congress to increase the limits of OPA liability for all vessels.
OPA requires owners and operators of vessels to establish and maintain with the United States
Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their potential liabilities
under OPA. Under the regulations, vessel owners and operators may evidence their financial
responsibility by showing proof of insurance, surety bond, self-insurance, or guaranty. Upon
satisfactory demonstration of financial responsibility, a Certificate of Financial Responsibility,
or COFR, is issued by the United States Coast Guard. This certificate must be carried aboard the
vessel to comply with these financial responsibility regulations. We have complied with these
financial responsibility regulations by obtaining and carrying COFRs for each of our vessels that
operate in U.S. waters, currently the M/V Free Goddess, the M/V Free Impala and the M/V Free
Jupiter. We may incur additional costs to obtain COFRs for additional vessels, if required, and to
comply with increased limits of liability in the future.
OPA specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard
to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and some states have enacted
legislation providing for unlimited liability for oil spills. In some cases, states, which have
enacted such legislation, have not yet issued implementing regulations defining vessels owners
responsibilities under these laws. We currently comply, and intend to continue to comply in the
future, with all applicable state regulations in the ports where our vessels call.
We currently maintain pollution liability coverage as part of our protection and indemnity
insurance for each of our vessels in the amount of $1 billion per incident. If the damages from a
catastrophic pollution liability incident exceed our insurance coverage, the payment of those
damages may materially decrease our net income.
The United States Clean Water Act
The United States Clean Water Act, or CWA, prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous
substances in navigable waters and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any
unauthorized discharges. The CWA also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal,
remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under the OPA and CERCLA.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, regulates the discharge of ballast water
and other wastewater incidental to the operation of a vessel under the CWA. EPA regulations require
vessels greater than 79 feet in length (excluding commercial fishing vessels) to obtain coverage
under the Vessel General Permit, or VGP, to discharge ballast water and other wastewaters into U.S.
waters by submitting a Notice of Intent. We have
65
submitted Notices of Intent for all of our vessels. The new VGP requires vessel owners and
operators to comply with a range of best management practices, reporting, and other requirements,
for various types of discharges and incorporates United States Coast Guard requirements for ballast
water management and exchange. In order to remain covered by the VGP, vessels must comply with
numerous inspection, monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Vessel owners/operators
must, among other things, conduct and document routine self-inspection to track compliance with the
VGP, and must conduct a comprehensive vessel inspection every 12 months. As part of a settlement of
a lawsuit challenging the VGP, EPA has recently agreed to propose a new VGP with numerical
restrictions on organisms in ballast water discharges by November 2011. Compliance with the
current VGP and any new VGP could require the installation of equipment on our vessels to treat
ballast water before it is discharged or the implementation of other port facility disposal
arrangements or procedures at potentially substantial cost, and/or otherwise restrict our vessels
from entering U.S. waters.
Other Environmental Initiatives
In waters of the European Union, our vessels are subject to regulation European Union-level
directives implemented by the various nations through laws and regulations of these requirements.
These laws and regulations prescribe measures to prevent pollution, protect the environment, and
support maritime safety. For instance, the European Union has adopted directives that require
member states to refuse access to their ports to certain sub-standard vessels, according to vessel
type, flag, and number of previous detentions. Member states must inspect at least 25% of vessels
using their ports annually and provide increased surveillance of vessels posing a high risk to
maritime safety or the marine environment. If deficiencies are found that are clearly hazardous to
safety, health or the environment, the state is required to detain the vessel until the
deficiencies are addressed. Member states are also required to implement a system of penalties for
breaches of these standards.
The EUs directive on the sulfur content of fuels restricts the maximum sulfur content of
marine fuels used in vessels operating in EU member states exclusive economic zones. Under this
directive, our vessels may need to make expenditures to comply with the sulfur fuel content limits
in the marine fuel they use in order to avoid delays or other obstructions to their operations. The
EU has also issued a directive adopting the IMOs standards for the maximum sulfur content of
marine fuels used in special sulfur oxide Emission Control Areas, or ECAs, in the Baltic Sea, the
North Sea, and for any other seas or ports the IMO may designate as sulfur oxide ECAs 12 months
after the date of entry into force of the designation. These and other related requirements may
increase our costs of operating and may affect financial performance.
In 2005, the European Union adopted a directive on ship-source pollution. In October 2009, the
European Union amended the directive to impose criminal sanctions for illicit ship-source
discharges of polluting substances, including minor discharges, if committed with intent,
recklessly, or with serious negligence and the discharges individually or in the aggregate result
in deterioration of the quality of water. The directive could result in criminal liability for
pollution from vessels in waters of European countries that adopt implementing legislation.
Criminal liability for pollution may result in substantial penalties or fines and increased civil
liability claims.
The European Union is currently considering proposals to further regulate vessel operations.
Individual countries in the European Union may also have additional environmental and safety
requirements. It is difficult to predict what legislation or regulation, if any, may be adopted by
the European Union or any other country or authority.
Although the United States is not a party thereto, many countries have ratified and currently
follow the liability plan adopted by the IMO and set out in the International Convention on Civil
Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969, or the 1969 Convention. Under this convention, and
depending on whether the country in which the damage results is a party to the 1992 Protocol to the
International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, a vessels registered owner
is strictly liable for pollution damage caused in the territorial waters of a contracting state by
discharge of persistent oil, subject to certain complete defenses. The limits on liability outlined
in the 1992 Protocol use the International Monetary Fund currency unit of Special Drawing Rights,
or SDR. Under an amendment to the 1992 Protocol that became effective in November 2003, for vessels
of 5,000 to 140,000 gross tons, liability is limited to approximately 4.51 million SDR plus 631 SDR
for each additional gross ton over 5,000. For vessels of over 140,000 gross tons, liability is
limited to 89.77 million SDR. The exchange rate between SDRs and
U.S. dollars was 0.632939 SDR per
U.S. dollar on March 28, 2011. Under the 1969 Convention, the right to limit liability is forfeited
where the spill is caused by the owners actual fault; under the 1992 Protocol, a shipowner
66
cannot limit liability where the spill is caused by the owners intentional or reckless
conduct. Vessels trading in jurisdictions that are parties to these conventions must provide
evidence of insurance covering the liability of the owner. In jurisdictions where the 1969
Convention has not been adopted, including the United States, various legislative schemes or common
law govern, and liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or in a manner similar to that
convention. We believe that our protection and indemnity insurance will cover the liability under
the plan adopted by the IMO.
The U.S. National Invasive Species Act, or NISA, was enacted in 1996 in response to growing
reports of harmful organisms being released into U.S. ports through ballast water taken on by ships
in foreign ports. The United States Coast Guard adopted regulations under NISA that impose
mandatory ballast water management practices for all vessels equipped with ballast water tanks
entering U.S. waters. These requirements can be met by performing mid-ocean ballast exchange, which
is the exchange of ballast water on the waters beyond the exclusive economic zone from an area more
than 200 miles from any shore, by retaining ballast water on board the ship or by using
environmentally sound alternative ballast water management methods approved by the United States
Coast Guard. However, mid-ocean ballast exchange is mandatory for ships heading to the Great Lakes
or Hudson Bay. Mid-ocean ballast exchange is the primary method for compliance with the United
States Coast Guard regulations, since holding ballast water can prevent ships from performing cargo
operations upon arrival in the United States, and alternative methods are still under development.
Vessels that are unable to conduct mid-ocean ballast exchange due to voyage or safety concerns may
discharge minimum amounts of ballast water (in areas other than the Great Lakes and the Hudson
River), provided that they comply with recordkeeping requirements and document the reasons they
could not follow the required ballast water management requirements. The Coast Guard has issued
proposed standards for ballast water discharge, which could set maximum acceptable discharge limits
for various invasive species, or lead to requirement for active treatment of ballast water.
Compliance with any new regulations could require the installation of equipment on our vessels to
treat ballast water before it is discharged or arranging for disposal at port facilities at
potentially substantial costs.
At the international level, the IMO adopted an International Convention for the Control and
Management of Ships Ballast Water and Sediments, or the BWM Convention, in February 2004. The BWM
Conventions implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water
exchange requirements, to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits. The BWM
Convention will not be in force until 12 months after it has been adopted by 30 countries, the
combined merchant fleets of which represent not less than 35% of the gross tonnage of the worlds
merchant shipping. As of February 28, 2011, the BWM Convention has been adopted by 27 states,
representing approximately 25.32% of the worlds tonnage. Despite the lack of ratification, the
Marine Environment Protection Committee of IMO passed a resolution in March 2010 calling upon those
countries that have ratified the treaty to encourage the installation of ballast water management
systems.
Greenhouse Gas Regulation
In February 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change, or
Kyoto Protocol, entered into force. Under the Kyoto Protocol, adopting countries are required to
implement national programs to reduce emissions of certain gases, generally referred to as
greenhouse gases, which are suspected of contributing to global warming. Currently, emissions of
greenhouse gases from international shipping are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol. At the December
2010 meeting of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cancun, the IMO proposed measures
to control greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping. The EU indicated that if the IMO
did not decide how to address greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping before December
2010, the EU would include international shipping in its emissions trading scheme. The IMO is
currently evaluating various mandatory measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from
international shipping, including market-based mechanisms and energy efficiency standards. In the
United States, the EPA has issued a finding that greenhouse gases threaten public health and safety
and has adopted regulations governing the emission of greenhouse gases from motor vehicles and
large stationary sources. The EPA may decide in the future to regulate greenhouse gas emissions
from ships and is considering a petition from the California Attorney General to regulate
greenhouse gas emissions from ocean-going vessels.
Any passage of climate change legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, the
European Union, the United States or other countries where we operate that restrict emissions of
greenhouse gases could require us to make significant financial expenditures that we cannot predict
with any certainty at this time.
67
Vessel Security Regulation
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives
intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, the Maritime Transportation Security Act
of 2002, or MTSA, came into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the
United States Coast Guard issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security
requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of
America. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAS created a new chapter of the convention
dealing specifically with maritime security. The new chapter went into effect in July 2004, and
imposes various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are
contained in the newly created ISPS Code. Among the various requirements are:
|
|
|
on-board installation of automatic information systems, to enhance
vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-shore communications; |
|
|
|
|
|
on-board installation of ship security alert systems; |
|
|
|
|
|
the development of vessel security plans; and |
|
|
|
|
compliance with flag state security certification requirements. |
The United States Coast Guard regulations, intended to align with international maritime
security standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel security measures provided such
vessels have on board, by July 1, 2004, a valid International Ship Security Certificate that
attests to the vessels compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code. Our vessels
are in compliance with the various security measures addressed by the MTSA, SOLAS and the ISPS
Code. We do not believe these additional requirements will have a material financial impact on our
operations.
Inspection by Classification Societies
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society
authorized by its country of registry. The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe
and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of
the vessel and SOLAS.
A vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys, dry-dockings and special surveys.
In lieu of a special survey, a vessels machinery may be on a continuous survey cycle, under which
the machinery would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. Our vessels are on special
survey cycles for hull inspection and continuous survey cycles for machinery inspection. Every
vessel is also required to be dry-docked every two to three years for inspection of the underwater
parts of such vessel. If any vessel does not maintain its class and/or fails any annual survey,
intermediate survey, dry-docking or special survey, the vessel will be unable to carry cargo
between ports and will be unemployable and uninsurable. That could cause us to be in violation of
certain covenants in our loan agreements.
At an owners application, the surveys required for class renewal may be split according to an
agreed schedule to extend over the entire period of class. This process is referred to as
continuous class renewal.
All areas subject to survey as defined by the classification society are required to be
surveyed at least once per class period, unless shorter intervals between surveys are prescribed
elsewhere. The period between two subsequent surveys of each area must not exceed five years.
Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage and lending that a
vessel be certified as in class by a classification society which is a member of the
International Association of Classification Societies. Our vessels are certified as being in
class by their respective classification societies all of which are members of the International
Association of Classification Societies.
The table below lists the next dry-docking and special surveys scheduled for our each vessel
in our fleet, to the extent such dates are known as of the date of this prospectus:
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next Intermediate |
|
Next Special Survey |
Vessel |
|
Dry-docking |
|
Dry-docking |
M/V Free Envoy
|
|
Second quarter 2011
|
|
Third quarter 2013 |
M/V Free Goddess
|
|
Third quarter 2013
|
|
Third quarter 2015 |
M/V Free Hero
|
|
Third quarter 2013
|
|
Third quarter 2015 |
M/V Free Impala
|
|
Third quarter 2015
|
|
Third quarter 2012 |
M/V Free Jupiter
|
|
Second quarter 2015
|
|
Second quarter 2012 |
M/V Free Knight
|
|
Second quarter 2016
|
|
Second quarter 2013 |
M/V Free Lady
|
|
Second quarter 2011
|
|
Second quarter 2013 |
M/V Free Maverick
|
|
First quarter 2016
|
|
First quarter 2013 |
M/V Free Neptune
|
|
Third quarter 2014
|
|
Third quarter 2011 |
ISM and ISPS certifications have been awarded to all of our vessels and to the Manager by
either the vessels flag country or a member of the International Association of Classification
Societies.
Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance
General
The operation of any cargo vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, physical damage,
collision, property loss, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to political
circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an
inherent possibility of marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental mishaps, and
the liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. OPA, which
imposes virtually unlimited liability upon owners, operators and bareboat charterers of any vessel
trading in the exclusive economic zone of the United States of America for certain oil pollution
accidents in the United States of America, has made liability insurance more expensive for ship
owners and operators trading in the United States of America market. While we believe that
our present insurance coverage is adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no
guarantee that any specific claim will be paid, or that we will always be able to obtain adequate
insurance coverage at reasonable rates.
Hull and Machinery Insurance
We have obtained marine hull and machinery and war risk insurance, which include the risk of
actual or constructive total loss, for all of our vessels. The vessels are each covered up to at
least their fair market values or such higher amounts as may be required to meet the requirements
of any outstanding indebtedness on a particular vessel, with deductibles in amounts of
approximately $100 to $200.
We arrange, as necessary, increased value insurance for our vessels. With the increased value
insurance, in case of total loss of the vessel, we can recover the sum insured under the increased
value policy in addition to the sum insured under the hull and machinery policy. Increased value
insurance also covers excess liabilities which are not recoverable in full by the hull and
machinery policies by reason of under insurance.
Protection and Indemnity Insurance
Protection and indemnity insurance is provided by mutual protection and indemnity
associations, or P&I associations, which covers our third-party liabilities in connection with our
shipping activities. This includes third-party liability and other related expenses of injury or
death of crew, passengers and other third parties, loss or damage to cargo, claims arising from
collisions with other vessels, damage to other third-party property, pollution arising from oil or
other substances, and salvage, towing and other related costs, including wreck removal. Protection
and indemnity insurance is a form of mutual indemnity insurance, extended by protection and
indemnity mutual associations, or clubs.
Our current protection and indemnity insurance coverage for pollution is $1 billion per vessel
per incident. The 14 P&I associations that comprise the International Group insure approximately
90% of the worlds commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each
associations liabilities. Each P&I association
69
has capped its exposure to this pooling agreement at $5.4 billion. As a member of a P&I
association, which is a member of the International Group, we are subject to calls payable to the
associations based on its claim records as well as the claim records of all other members of the
individual associations and members of the pool of P&I associations comprising the International
Group.
Loss of Hire Insurance
We have not obtained loss of hire insurance for any of our vessels. Loss of hire insurance
generally provides coverage against loss of charter hire that result from the loss of use of a
vessel. We will review annually whether obtaining and/or maintaining this insurance is cost
effective. Our ability to obtain loss of hire insurance is subject to market conditions and general
availability.
Kidnap and Ransom
We have kidnap and ransom insurance on a case by case basis, generally when one of our vessels
is transitioning in an area where acts of piracy are known to take place. Kidnap and ransom
insurance generally provides coverage against loss of earnings that result from the payment of
ransom, fees of negotiators and crisis management personnel and the cost of reinstatement of
replacement crew. The loss of earning extension covers the insured for any hire lost during
seizure for a certain number of days that have been agreed on at the inception of the coverage,
typically either 90, 120 or 180 days.
Procedures in the Event of an Insured Event
Marine casualties are an inherent risk in the shipping industry. If one of our vessels
undergoes a marine casualty, we intend to take prompt action in consultation with the appropriate
insurers, as described above, to ascertain the extent of any damage to our vessel, its cargo, the
crew, the vessels ability to complete its charter and any environmental impact and the appropriate
steps to try to mitigate the impact of the casualty on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Legal Proceedings
We are not currently a party to any material lawsuit that, if adversely determined, we believe
would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations or liquidity.
Exchange Controls
Under Marshall Islands law, there are currently no restrictions on the export or import of
capital, including foreign exchange controls or restrictions that affect the remittance of
dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our common stock.
70
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Senior Management
The following sets forth the names of the members of our board of directors and our senior
management. Generally, each member of the board of directors serves for a three-year term.
Additionally, the directors are divided among three classes, so the term of office of a certain
number of directors expires each year. Consequently, the number of directors who stand for
re-election each year may vary. Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the pleasure
of, the board of directors. The primary business address of each of our executive officers and
directors is 89 Akti Miaouli & 4 Mavrokordatou Street, 185 38, Piraeus, Greece.
In December 2010, George Kalogeropoulos joined our Board of Directors as a Board member,
replacing Kostas Koutsoubelis, who resigned on December 8, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
|
Expires |
Ion G. Varouxakis
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and
President
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Alexandros Mylonas
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
George Kalogeropoulos
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2012 |
|
Didier Salomon
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2012 |
|
Focko H. Nauta
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Dimitrios Panagiotopoulos
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Keith Bloomfield
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Maria Badekas
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
Ion G. Varouxakis is one of our founders and is the Chairman of our board of directors. He
also serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer. In 2003, Mr. Varouxakis founded Free
Bulkers, the beginning of a single-vessel, self-financed entrepreneurial venture that led to
FreeSeas founding and NASDAQ listing in 2005. Prior to founding Free Bulkers, Mr. Varouxakis held
since 1997 management positions in private shipping companies operating in the drybulk sector. Mr.
Varouxakis holds a candidature degree in law from the Catholic University of Saint Louis in
Brussels and a bachelor of science degree in economics from the London School of Economics and
Political Science. Mr. Varouxakis is a member of the Hellenic Committee of the Korean Register of
Shipping, is a member of the Hellenic and Black Sea Committee of Bureau Veritas and is an officer
of the reserves of the Hellenic Army.
Alexandros Mylonas is our Chief Financial Officer and joined us in October 2009. In addition,
he has served as our Treasurer since December 2010. Prior to joining FreeSeas, Mr. Mylonas was the
Banking Executive of Cardiff Marine Inc., a ship management company managing a fleet of tankers and
drybulk carriers including the fleet of DryShips Inc. a company listed on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market. From 2005 to 2008, Mr. Mylonas was an Account Manager with the Global Shipping Group of
Fortis Bank, an international shipping bank. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Mylonas was an Investment
Associate with NBG Venture Capital, a private equity firm investing in Southeast Europe. Mr.
Mylonas holds an MBA in Finance and Supply Chain Management from Michigan State University and a
Bachelor of Business Administration from University of Macedonia in Thessaloniki.
George Kalogeropoulos joined our board of directors in December 2010. He has over 30 years of
marine transportation experience, holding managerial positions in brokering, chartering, ship
management, and operations for large shipping companies in London and Greece. Since 1999, Mr.
Kalogeropoulos has served as the Commercial/Chartering Director of a number of affiliates of the
Restis Group of Companies. Mr. Kalogeropoulos currently serves on the boards of several companies
in the transportation industry, including Swissmarine Corporation Ltd., South African Marine Corp.,
Safore Pty, and Safbulk Pty Ltd. He is a member of the Hellenic Shipbrokers Association.
Didier Salomon joined our board of directors in 2008. He spent fifteen years as head of global
shipping at BNP Paribas overseeing a $10 billion shipping portfolio and managing an international
team of approximately 65 professionals. Prior to that, he held similar positions at Banque
Louis-Dreyfus, Banque Bruxelles Lambert and
71
Credit Naval. In late 2009, he established Shipadvise, a French company focusing on advisory
and consultancy in shipping. Mr. Salomon holds a diploma in political science (Sciences Po Paris),
a Master degree in law (Paris Assas) and a post graduate diploma in banking (Centre dEtudes
Superieures de Banque). For many years he has been a lecturer on the economy and capital markets at
the Conservatoire des Arts et Metiers in Paris.
Focko H. Nauta has been one our directors since 2005. Since September 2000, he has also been a
director of FinShip SA, a ship financing company. He assisted us in arranging debt financing with
Hollandsche-Bank Unie N.V. From 1997 through 1999, Mr. Nauta served as a managing director of Van
Ommeren Shipbroking, a London-based ship brokering company. Prior to 1997, he was a general manager
of a Fortis Bank branch. Mr. Nauta holds a degree in law from Leiden University in the Netherlands.
Dimitrios Panagiotopoulos joined our board of directors in 2007. He is the head of shipping
and corporate banking of Proton Bank, a Greek private bank, where he has served since April 2004.
From January 1997 to March 2004, he served as deputy head of the Greek shipping desk of BNP Paribas
and before that for four years as senior officer of the shipping department of Credit Lyonnais
Greece. From 1990 to 1993, he was working as chief accountant in Ionia Management, a Greek shipping
company. Mr. Panagiotopoulos also serves on the board of directors of Seanergy Maritime Holdings
Corp. He holds a degree in economics from Athens University and a masters of science in shipping,
trade and finance from City University of London. He was an officer of the Greek Special Forces and
today is a captain of the reserves of Hellenic Army.
Keith Bloomfield joined our board of directors in 2010. He has over 13 years of experience in
mergers and acquisitions, corporate law, and wealth management. He is currently the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Forbes Family Trust, a private wealth management firm which he founded
in September 2009. From October 2006 to September 2009, he was a Senior Managing Director and
Corporate Counsel at Third Avenue Management, a global asset management firm with approximately $16
billion in assets under management. At Third Avenue, he was responsible for mergers and
acquisitions, corporate transactions and business development. Prior to joining Third Avenue, he
was a corporate attorney with Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. Mr. Bloomfield earned an LL.M (Master
of Law) in Taxation from New York University School of Law and a J.D. with honors from Hofstra
University School of Law, and graduated summa cum laude with a B.A. in History from Tulane
University.
Maria Badekas holds a Bachelor in English and European Laws from Essex University (UK) and a
Master of Law from University of Cambridge (UK). From 2001 to 2003 she was a political expert to
the European Commission, DG Development. From 2003 to 2005, she was a special advisor to the Mayor
of Athens and participated in the preparation of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games (international
affairs and public relations). Between 2005 and 2006, she was a special advisor to the Minister of
the Hellenic Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and from 2006 to 2009, she was a special advisor to the
General Secretary for European Affairs of the Hellenic Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Compensation
The total gross compensation paid in 2010 to our directors was $194. Effective on January 1,
2010 if the U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange rate exceeds 1.35 on the last business day of each quarter,
then the amount of the directors fees payable for that quarter will be increased so that the
amount payable in U.S. Dollars will be the equivalent in Euros based on a 1.35 U.S. Dollar/Euro
exchange rate. Commencing October 1, 2008, in connection with the execution of our amended and
restated services agreement with our Manager, our Manager receives a monthly management fee from us
to provide overall executive and commercial management of our affairs. See Principal Shareholders
and Related Party Transactions. There are no agreements between us and any director that provide
for benefits upon termination or retirement.
Board Committees
Our board of directors has an audit committee, a compensation committee, a nominating
committee and a corporate governance committee. Our board of directors has adopted a charter for
each of these committees.
72
Audit Committee
Our audit committee consists of Messrs. Nauta, Salomon and Panagiotopoulos, each of whom is an
independent director. Mr. Nauta has been designated the Audit Committee Financial Expert under
the SEC rules and the current listing standards of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.
The audit committee has powers and performs the functions customarily performed by such a
committee (including those required of such a committee under the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and the
SEC). The audit committee is responsible for selecting and meeting with our independent registered
public accounting firm regarding, among other matters, audits and the adequacy of our accounting
and control systems.
Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee consists of Messrs. Bloomfield and Panagiotopoulos, each of whom is
an independent director. The compensation committee reviews and approves the compensation of our
executive officers.
Nominating Committee
Our nominating committee consists of Messrs. Bloomfield and Panagiotopoulos, each of whom is
an independent director. The nominating committee is responsible for overseeing the selection of
persons to be nominated to serve on our board of directors.
Corporate Governance Committee
Our corporate governance committee consists of Messrs. Salomon and Bloomfield, each of whom is
an independent director. The corporate governance committee ensures that we have and follow
appropriate governance standards.
Director Independence
Our securities are listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market and we are exempt from certain NASDAQ
listing requirements including the requirement that our board be composed of a majority of
independent directors. The board of directors has evaluated whether each of Messrs. Nauta, Salomon,
Panagiotopoulos and Bloomfield is an independent director within the meaning of the listing
requirements of NASDAQ. The NASDAQ independence definition includes a series of objective tests,
such as that the director is not our employee and has not engaged in various types of business
dealings with us. In addition, as further required by the NASDAQ requirements, the board of
directors made a subjective determination as to each of Messrs. Nauta, Salomon, Panagiotopoulos and
Bloomfield that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of the board of directors, would
interfere with the exercise of his independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a
director. In making this determination, the board of directors reviewed and discussed information
provided by each of Messrs. Nauta, Salomon, Panagiotopoulos and Bloomfield with regard to his
business and personal activities as they may relate to us and our management. After reviewing the
information presented to it, our board of directors has determined that each of Messrs. Nauta,
Salomon, Panagiotopoulos and Bloomfield is independent within the meaning of such rules. Our
independent directors will meet in executive session as often as necessary to fulfill their duties,
but no less frequently than annually.
Code of Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a code of conduct and ethics applicable to our directors, officers and
employees in accordance with applicable federal securities laws and the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.
Employees
We currently have no employees. Our Manager is responsible for employing all of the executive
officers and staff to execute and supervise our operations based on the strategy devised by the
board of directors and subject to the approval of our board of directors and for recruiting, and
employing, either directly or through a crewing agent, the senior officers and all other crew
members for our vessels.
73
Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
Our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan was implemented for the purpose of
furthering our long-term stability, continuing growth and financial success by retaining and
attracting key employees, officers and directors through the use of stock incentives. Our
shareholders approved the plan on December 19, 2006. Awards may be granted under the plan in the
form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend
equivalent rights, restricted stock, unrestricted stock, restricted stock units and performance
shares. Pursuant to the plan, we have reserved 300,000 shares of our common stock for awards, of
which 216,000 remain available for grant as of the date of this prospectus.
In December 2007, our Board of Directors granted 9,000 options to directors and 25,000 options
to executive officers, as adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split effective October 1, 2010, of
which 28,000 would vest in one year, 3,000 would vest in two years and 3,000 in three years from
the grant, all at an exercise price of $41.25 per share. Effective December 18, 2009, certain of
our officers and directors have forfeited 22,000 of the stock options granted to them, leaving
12,000 stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 2009. The outstanding stock options,
which expire on December 24, 2012, are vested and remain unexercised as of December 31, 2010.
On December 31, 2009 our Board of Directors awarded 255,000 restricted shares, as adjusted to
reflect the reverse stock split effective October 1, 2010, to its non-executive directors,
executive officers and certain of our Managers employees. Of the 255,000 restricted shares, 10,000
restricted shares with an original vesting date on December 31, 2010 have been forfeited in May
2010. Of the remaining 245,000 restricted shares, 71,000 restricted shares vested on December 31,
2009, 40,000 restricted shares vested on December 31, 2010, 84,000 restricted shares will vest on
December 31 2012 and 50,000 restricted shares will vest on December 31, 2013. Unvested restricted
shares amounted to 134,000 as of December 31, 2010.
All of our officers, directors and executive, managerial, administrative and professional
employees, including officers of our fleet manager, are eligible to receive awards under the plan.
Our board of directors has the power and complete discretion, as provided in the plan, to select
which persons will receive awards and to determine for each such person the terms, conditions and
nature of the award, and the number of shares to be allocated to each individual as part of each
award.
74
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets out certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our
common stock as of March 28, 2011 by each of our officers and directors, all of our officers and
directors as a group, and each person or group of affiliated persons who is currently known to us
to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of the shares of our common stock.
Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting
and investment power with respect to all shares of beneficially owned by them. As beneficial owners
of shares of common stock, the persons named in the table do not have different voting rights than
any other holder of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Number of Shares of |
|
Shares of Common |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Stock Beneficially |
Name |
|
Beneficially Owned |
|
Owned (1) |
Ion G. Varouxakis (2) |
|
|
546,274 |
|
|
|
8.42 |
% |
Alexandros Mylonas (3) |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
George Kalogeropoulos |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Didier Salomon |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Focko H. Nauta |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Dimitrios Panagiotopoulos |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Keith Bloomfield |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Maria Badekas |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (eight persons) |
|
|
611,674 |
|
|
|
9.42 |
% |
FS Holdings Limited (4) |
|
|
648,120 |
|
|
|
9.99 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of
common stock held by each person named above, any shares that the
named person has the right to acquire within 60 days under warrants or
options are deemed to be outstanding for that person, but are not
deemed to be outstanding when computing the percentage ownership of
any other person. Based on 6,487,852 shares of common stock
outstanding as of March 28, 2011. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Reflects 502,940 shares owned by The Midas Touch S.A., a
Marshall Islands corporation wholly owned by Mr. Varouxakis
and 3,334 shares underlying warrants owned by The Midas
Touch. Does not include 8,000 shares owned of record by V
Estates S.A., which is controlled by his father, or 6,120
shares owned of record by his mother, as to which
shares he disclaims beneficial ownership. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Share ownership does not vest until December 31, 2013 pursuant to the
terms of a restricted stock agreement dated December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Reflects 561,757 shares owned by FS Holdings Limited, a
Marshall Islands corporation, and 86,363 shares owned by
Benbay Limited, a Republic of Cyprus corporation, each of
which is controlled by the Restis family. |
|
75
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Management and Services Agreements
Manager
All of our vessels receive management services from the Manager, pursuant to ship management
agreements between each of the ship-owning companies and the Manager.
On October 1, 2010, the subsidiaries Adventure Fourteen S.A. and Adventure Fifteen S.A.
entered into management agreements with the Manager for the provision of management services to
Hull 1 and Hull 2.
Each of our ship owning subsidiaries pays, as per its management agreement with the Manager,
monthly technical management fee of $16.5 (on the basis that the dollar/Euro exchange rate is 1.30
or lower; if on the first business day of each month the dollar/Euro exchange rate exceeds 1.30
then the management fee payable will be increased for the month in question, so that the amount
payable in U.S. dollars will be the equivalent in Euro based on 1.30 dollar/Euro exchange rate)
plus a fee of $0.4 per day for superintendant attendance and other direct expenses.
FreeSeas also pays the Manager a fee equal to 1.25% of the gross freight or hire from the
employment of FreeSeas vessels. The Manager has subcontracted the charter and post charter
management of FreeSeas vessels and pays the 1.25% of the gross freight or hire from the employment
of the vessels to Safbulk Pty Ltd (Safbulk), an entity affiliated with one of our major
shareholders. In addition, FreeSeas pays a 1% commission on the gross purchase price of any new
vessel acquired or the gross sale price of any vessel sold by FreeSeas with the assistance of the
Manager. In this respect, we paid Free Bulkers $32 relating to the sale of M/V Free Destiny and
$488 relating to the signing of shipbuilding contracts for the construction of two handysize
vessels in 2010 and $110 relating to the acquisition of M/V Free Neptune in 2009. In addition, we
have incurred commission expense relating to our commercial agreement with the Manager amounting to
$728, $752 and $866 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively, included in
Commissions in our consolidated statements of operations.
FreeSeas pays, as per its services agreement with the Manager, a monthly fee of $118.5, (on
the basis that the dollar/Euro exchange rate is 1.35 or lower; if on the last business day of each
month the dollar/Euro exchange rate exceeds 1.35 then the service fee payable will be adjusted for
the following month in question, so that the amount payable in dollars will be the equivalent in
Euro based on 1.35 dollar/Euro exchange rate) as compensation for services related to accounting,
financial reporting, implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley internal control over financial reporting
procedures and general administrative and management services plus expenses. The Manager is
entitled to a termination fee if the agreement is terminated upon a change of control as defined
in its services agreement with the Manager. The termination fee as of December 31, 2010 would be
$100,298.
Fees and expenses charged by the Manager are included in our financial statements in
Management fees to a related party, General and administrative expenses, Operating expenses,
Gain on sale of vessel, Vessels, Vessel impairment loss and Advances for vessels under
construction. The total amounts charged for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
amounted to $3,826 ($1,978 of management fees, $1,439 of services fees, $178 of superintendent
fees, $117 for other expenses and $114 for management fees and supervision expenses for vessels
under construction), $3,245 ($1,874 of management fees, $1,313 of services fees and $58 of
superintendent fees) and $2,634 ($1,655 of management fees, $679 of services fees and $300 of
partial contribution for the refurbishment of the office space used by us), respectively.
On December 31, 2009, we granted 84,000 restricted shares to certain of the Managers
employees vesting in December 2012 pursuant to our equity incentive plan.
The cost of these shares is amortized over their vesting period and is included in General
and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. In
addition, in December 2010 and 2009, a bonus of $400 and $200 respectively, was granted to the
Manager, which is included in General and administrative expenses, in our consolidated financial
statements.
The balance due from the Manager as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $1,285 and
$1,410 respectively. The amount paid to the Manager for office space during the year ended
December 31, 2010,
76
2009 and 2008 was $204, $197 and $206, respectively and is included in General and
administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
First Business Bank (FBB)
FreeSeas received from FBB, in which Ion G. Varouxakis, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President, owns a minority interest, and in which members of the Restis family hold a
substantial interest, a loan of $26,250 which has been used to partly finance the acquisition of
the M/V Free Impala in April 2008. On December 15, 2009, we reached an agreement for a new secured
term loan of $27,750 from FBB to refinance its then outstanding loan balance of $21,750 and to
receive additional liquidity of up to $6,000 with a first priority mortgage over the M/V Free
Impala and the M/V Free Neptune. The outstanding balance of the loan as of December 31, 2010 was
$25,750. Interest charged under the loan facility for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008 amounts to $893, $629 and $874, respectively, and is included in the interest and finance cost
in our consolidated statements of operations.
Other Related Parties
We, through Free Bulkers and Safbulk, use, from time to time, a ship-brokering firm associated
with family members of Ion G. Varouxakis, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, for
certain of the charters of our fleet. During the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 such
ship-brokering firm charged us commissions of $175, $48 and $112, respectively, which are included
in Commissions in our consolidated statements of operations. The balance due to the
ship-brokering firm as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $98 and $18 respectively.
77
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Upon completion of this offering, we will have [______] shares of common stock outstanding or
[______] shares of common stock if
the agents option is exercised in full and
we will have [________]
shares of common stock issuable under outstanding options and warrants.
The [______] shares of common stock sold in this offering, or [______] shares of common stock if
the agents option is exercised in full, will be freely transferable in the
United States without restriction under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), except for any shares purchased by one of our affiliates, which will be subject to the
resale limitations of Rule 144 under Securities Act.
After the consummation of this offering, our existing shareholders will continue to own
1,264,817 shares of common stock which were acquired in private transactions not involving a public
offering and these shares are therefore treated as restricted securities for purposes of Rule
144. The restricted securities held by certain of these existing shareholders, our officers,
directors and certain parties will be subject to the agents 75-day lock-up agreement.
Restricted securities may not be resold except in compliance with the registration requirements of
the Securities Act or under an exemption from those registration requirements, such as the
exemptions provided by Rule 144, Regulation S and other exemptions under the Securities Act.
Securities currently registered under our existing Form F-3 resale registration statement may
continue to be registered and sold thereunder by some of our shareholders but may not be sold by
certain of our shareholders during the 75-day lock-up period with respect to those shareholders
that have executed lock-up agreements.
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person or persons whose shares are
aggregated, who owns shares that were acquired from the issuer or an affiliate at least six months
ago, would be entitled to sell within any three-month period, a number of shares that does not
exceed the greater of (i) 1% of the then outstanding shares of the applicable class of stock, or
(ii) an amount equal to the average weekly reported volume of trading in shares of the applicable
class of stock on all national securities exchanges and/or reported through the automated quotation
system of registered securities associations during the four calendar weeks preceding the date on
which notice of the sale is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Sales in reliance on
Rule 144 are also subject to other requirements regarding the manner of sale, notice and
availability of current public information about us. A person or persons whose shares are
aggregated, who is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates at any time during the 75 days
immediately preceding the sale may sell restricted securities in reliance on Rule 144 without
regard to the limitations described above, provided that one year has elapsed since the later of
the date on which the same restricted securities were acquired from us or one of our affiliates. As
defined in Rule 144, an affiliate of an issuer is a person that directly, or indirectly through
on or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, that
same issuer.
Our directors and officers and certain of our existing affiliated shareholders, which own
1,259,794 shares during the period beginning from the date of this prospectus and continuing to and
including the date 75 days after the date of this prospectus, may not offer, sell, contract to sell
or otherwise dispose of any of our securities which are substantially similar to our common stock
or which are convertible or exchangeable into securities which are substantially similar to our
common stock, without the prior written consent of Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC.
As a result of these lock-up agreements and rules of the Securities Act, the restricted shares
will be available for sale in the public market, subject to certain volume and other restrictions,
mentioned above, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Days After the Date |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
of this Prospectus |
|
Eligible for Sales |
|
Comment |
Date of prospectus
|
|
|
|
Shares not locked up and eligible for sale freely or under Rule 144 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 days
|
|
|
|
Lock-up released |
No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales or the availability of
shares for sale will have on the market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time.
Nevertheless, sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the
perception that those sales may occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our
common stock.
78
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
We have summarized below the material features of our capital stock. This summary is not a
complete discussion of our organizational documents and other instruments that create the rights of
our shareholders. We urge you to carefully read those documents and instruments. Please see Where
You Can Find Additional Information for information on how to obtain copies of those documents and
instruments.
Our authorized capital stock consists of 250,000,000 shares of common stock, par value, $.001
per share, of which 6,487,852 shares are issued and outstanding as of March 28, 2011, and 5,000,000
shares of blank check preferred stock, par value, $.001 per share, none of which are outstanding.
All of our shares of stock must be in registered form.
Common Stock
As of March 28, 2011, 6,487,852 shares of common stock were outstanding out of 250,000,000
shares authorized to be issued, which is the same number of shares that were outstanding on
December 31, 2010. As of March 28, 2011, 373,002 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance
upon the exercise of various outstanding options and warrants. Each outstanding share of common
stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Subject
to preferences that may be applicable to shares of preferred stock that may be issued in the
future, holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, declared by
our board of directors out of funds legally available for dividends. Holders of common stock do not
have conversion, redemption or preemptive rights to subscribe to any of our securities. All
outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and nonassessable. The rights, preferences and
privileges of holders of common stock are subject to the rights of the holders of any shares of
preferred stock that FreeSeas may issue in the future.
Preferred Stock
As of the date of this prospectus, we are authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of blank
check preferred stock. Our board of directors can determine the rights, designations and
preferences of the preferred stock, and authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock without
any further vote or action by our shareholders.
We have entered into a shareholders rights agreement with American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, LLC effective January 14, 2009 and declared a dividend of one purchase right, or a Right,
to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of our Series A Participating Preferred Stock, par value
$0.001 per share, for each outstanding share of our common stock. The dividend was paid on January
23, 2009 to our shareholders of record on that date. In addition, we authorized the issuance of one
Right in respect of each share of common stock that shall become outstanding at any time between
January 23, 2009 and the earliest of the distribution date, the redemption date or the final
expiration date, as such terms are defined in the shareholders rights agreement, including shares
of common stock that become outstanding upon the exercise or conversion of options, warrants or
convertible securities as long as they are outstanding on the distribution date. Each Right
entitles the registered holder, upon the occurrence of certain events, to purchase from us one
one-thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $90.00, subject to adjustment.
The Rights become exercisable under certain circumstances set forth in the shareholders rights
agreement.
Other Securities
Class A Warrants
As of March 28, 2011, we had 150,000 Class A warrants outstanding. Each Class A warrant
entitles the holder to purchase 1/5 of a share of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.00
per share, or $25.00 per share, only exercisable for whole shares, and expires on July 29, 2011. We
issued to our founding shareholders warrants to purchase an aggregate of 40,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $25.00 per share, of which warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 30,000 shares of our common stock remain outstanding. The exercise price of the Class A warrants
will be adjusted upon the occurrence of certain corporate events such as stock dividends or splits.
The Class A warrants are not callable or redeemable.
79
Class Z Warrants
As of March 28, 2011, we had 1,655,006 Class Z warrants outstanding. Each Class Z warrant
entitles the holder to purchase 1/5 of a share of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.00
per share, or $25.00 per share, only exercisable for whole shares, and expires on July 29, 2011 or
upon earlier redemption. The exercise price of the Class Z warrants will be adjusted upon the
occurrence of certain corporate events such as stock dividends or splits. We may redeem the
outstanding Class Z warrants in whole and not in part, at a price of $0.25 per warrant at any time
after the warrants become exercisable, upon a minimum of 30 days prior written notice of
redemption to the holders of record of the warrant, if the last sale price of our common stock
equals or exceeds $43.75 per share for a Class Z warrant for any 20 trading days within a
30-trading-day period ending three business days before we send the notice of redemption. Any Class
Z warrant either not exercised or tendered back to us by the end of the date specified in the
notice of call will be cancelled on our books and will have no further value except for the $0.25
call price.
Employee Options
Pursuant to our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, there are outstanding options
to purchase a total of 12,000 shares of our common stock, all of which options have vested. The
options entitle the holders to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $25.00
per share until December 24, 2012.
Other Matters
Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
Our purpose, as stated in section 3.B. of our amended and restated articles of incorporation,
is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may now or hereafter be organized
under the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act, or BCA. Our amended and restated articles of
incorporation and by-laws do not impose any limitations on the ownership rights of our
shareholders.
Under our by-laws, annual shareholders meetings will be held at a time and place selected by
our board of directors. The meetings may be held in or outside of the Marshall Islands. Special
meetings may be called by the board of directors, by our Chairman or by our President. Our board of
directors may set a record date between 15 and 60 days before the date of any meeting to determine
the shareholders that will be eligible to receive notice and vote at the meeting.
Directors
Our directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at a meeting of the shareholders by
the holders of shares entitled to vote in the election. There is no provision for cumulative
voting. The board of directors has the authority to fix the amounts that shall be payable to the
members of our board of directors for attendance at any meeting or for services rendered to us. Our
by-laws provide, generally, that the vote to authorize a transaction by a director who has a
financial interest in such transaction, or is an officer or director of the opposite party to the
transaction, will be counted if, the material facts of the relationship or interest have been
disclosed, and the transaction is approved by the appropriate number of our disinterested directors
or by our shareholders.
Anti-Takeover Provisions of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
Several provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and by-laws and our
shareholder rights plan may have anti-takeover effects. These are intended to avoid costly takeover
battles, lessen our vulnerability to a hostile change of control, and enhance the ability of our
board of directors to maximize shareholder value in connection with any unsolicited offer to
acquire FreeSeas. These anti-takeover provisions, however, could also discourage, delay or prevent
(1) the merger or acquisition of FreeSeas by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise,
that a shareholder may consider in its best interest and (2) the removal of incumbent directors and
officers. These provisions are summarized below.
80
Blank Check Preferred Stock
Our board of directors has the authority, without any further vote or action by our
shareholders, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock. Our board of
directors may issue shares of preferred stock on terms calculated to discourage, delay or prevent a
change of control of FreeSeas or the removal of our management.
Classified Board of Directors
Our directors serve staggered, three-year terms. Approximately one-third of our directors are
elected each year. The classification of the directors could discourage a third party from making a
tender offer for our stock or attempting to obtain control of FreeSeas. It could also delay
shareholders who do not agree with the policies of the board of directors from removing a majority
of the board of directors for two years.
Supermajority Director Voting Requirement to Change Number of Directors
Our board of directors may only change the size of the board by a vote of not less than
66-2/3% of the directors then in office. This provision makes it more difficult to increase the
number of directors in an attempt to gain a majority of directors through the addition of more
directors.
Election and Removal of Directors
Cumulative voting in the election of directors is not permitted. Our amended and restated
by-laws require parties other than the board of directors to give advance written notice of
nominations for the election of directors. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation
provide that directors may be removed only for cause and only upon the affirmative vote of either
the holders of at least 66-2/3% of our issued and outstanding voting stock or by our board of
directors. They also require advance written notice of any proposals by shareholders to remove a
director. These provisions may discourage, delay or prevent the removal of incumbent directors
and/or officers.
Limited Actions by Shareholders
The BCA provides that any action required or permitted to be taken by our shareholders must be
done at an annual meeting or special meeting of shareholders or by the unanimous written consent of
the shareholders. Our by-laws provide that only our board of directors, the Chairman or the
President may call special meetings of shareholders. The BCA provides that the business that can be
transacted at a special meeting of shareholders must be related to the purpose or purposes stated
in the notice of the meeting.
Other Supermajority Voting Requirements
Our shareholders can make, alter, amend or repeal our by-laws only upon the affirmative vote
of 66-2/3% of the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors. The provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation with respect to
directors and our by-laws can only be amended by the affirmative vote of 66-2/3% of the outstanding
shares of capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. Such supermajority
voting requirements make these provisions more difficult to change and thus may discourage, delay
or prevent the removal of incumbent directors and/or officers.
Shareholder Rights Plan
We have implemented a shareholder rights plan pursuant to which the holders of our common
stock receive one right to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of our Series A Participating
Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $90.00, subject to adjustment. The rights become
exercisable upon the occurrence of certain change in control events. These anti-takeover provisions
and our shareholder rights plan could substantially impede the ability of public shareholders to
benefit from a change in control and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our
common shares and your ability to realize any potential change of
control premium.
Our Transfer Agent and Warrant Agent
The transfer agent for our common stock and warrant agent for our warrants is American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, LLC.
81
Limitations on Liability and Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Our Amended and Restated By-Laws provide that any person who is or was one of our directors or
officers, or is or was serving at our request as a director or officer of another corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, shall be entitled to be indemnified by us
upon the same terms, under the same conditions, and to the same extent as authorized by Section 60
of the Business Corporations Act (Part I of the Associations Law) of the Republic of the Marshall
Islands, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed
to our best interests, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable
cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The applicable provisions of Section 60 of the Business
Corporations Act (Part I of the Associations Law) of the Republic of the Marshall Islands are set
forth below in Part II, Item 6.
There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding involving any of our
directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought.
82
MARSHALL ISLANDS COMPANY CONSIDERATIONS
Our corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated articles of incorporation and
amended and restated by-laws and by the Business Corporations Act of the Republic of the Marshall
Islands, or BCA. The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number
of states in the United States. For example, the BCA allows the adoption of various anti-takeover
measures such as shareholder rights plans. While the BCA also provides that it is to be
interpreted according to the laws of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially
similar legislative provisions, there have been few, if any, court cases interpreting the BCA in
the Marshall Islands and we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same
conclusions as U.S. courts. Thus, you may have more difficulty in protecting your interests in the
face of actions by the management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of
a corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction that has developed a substantial body of
case law. The following table provides a comparison between the statutory provisions of the BCA and
the Delaware General Corporation Law relating to shareholders rights.
|
|
|
Marshall Islands |
|
Delaware |
Shareholders Meetings
|
Held at a time and place as designated in the
by-laws
|
|
May be held at such time or place as
designated in the certificate of
incorporation or the bylaws, or if not so
designated, as determined by the board of
directors |
|
|
|
May be held within or outside the Marshall Islands
|
|
May be held within or outside Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
Notice: |
|
|
|
Whenever shareholders are required to take action
at a meeting, written notice shall state the place,
date and hour of the meeting and, unless it is the
annual meeting, indicate that it is being issued by
or at the direction of the person or persons calling
the meeting. Notice of a special meeting shall also
state the purpose for which the meeting is called
|
|
Whenever shareholders are required or
permitted to take any action at a
meeting, a written notice of the meeting
shall be given which shall state the
place, if any, date and hour of the
meeting, and the means of remote
communication, if any |
|
|
|
A copy of the notice of any meeting shall be given
personally or sent by mail not less than 15 nor more
than 60 days before the meeting
|
|
Written notice shall be given not less
than 10 nor more than 60 days before the
date of the meeting |
|
|
|
Shareholders Voting Rights
|
|
|
|
Any action required to be taken by meeting of
shareholders may be taken without meeting if consent
is in writing and is signed by all the shareholders
entitled to vote
|
|
Stockholders may act by written consent
to elect directors |
|
|
|
Any person authorized to vote may authorize another
person to act for him by proxy
|
|
Any person authorized to vote may
authorize another person or persons to
act for him by proxy |
|
|
|
Unless otherwise provided in the articles of
incorporation, a majority of shares entitled to vote
constitutes a quorum. In no event shall a quorum
consist of fewer than one third of the shares
entitled to vote at a meeting. Once a quorum is
present to organize a meeting, it is not broken by
the subsequent withdrawal of any shareholders
|
|
For non-stock corporations, certificate
of incorporation or bylaws may specify
the number of members necessary to
constitute a quorum. In the absence of
this, one-third of the members shall
constitute a quorum |
|
|
|
The articles of incorporation may provide for
cumulative voting in the election of directors
|
|
For stock corporations, certificate of
incorporation or bylaws may specify the
number of members necessary to constitute
a quorum but in no event shall a quorum
consist of less than one-third of the
shares entitled to vote at the meeting.
In the absence of such specifications, a
majority of shares entitled to vote at
|
83
|
|
|
Marshall Islands |
|
Delaware |
|
|
the meeting shall constitute a quorum |
|
Any two or more domestic corporations may merge
into a single corporation if approved by the board
and if authorized by a majority vote of the holders
of outstanding shares at a stockholder meeting
|
|
The certificate of incorporation may
provide for cumulative voting |
|
|
|
Any sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of
all or substantially all the assets of a corporation,
if not made in the corporations usual or regular
course of business, once approved by the board, shall
be authorized by the affirmative vote of two-thirds
of the shares of those entitled to vote at a
shareholder meeting
|
|
Any two or more corporations existing
under the laws of state may merge into a
single corporation pursuant to a board
resolution and upon the majority vote by
stockholders of each constituent
corporation at an annual or special
meeting |
|
|
|
|
|
Every corporation may at any meeting of
the board sell, lease or exchange all or
substantially all of its property and
assets as its board deems expedient and
for the best interests of the corporation
when so authorized by a resolution
adopted by the holders of a majority of
the outstanding stock of a corporation
entitled to vote |
|
|
|
Any domestic corporation owning at least 90% of the
outstanding shares of each class of another domestic
corporation may merge such other corporation into
itself without the authorization of the shareholders
of any corporation
|
|
Any corporation owning at least 90% of
the outstanding shares of each class of
another corporation may merge the other
corporation into itself and assume all of
its obligations without the vote or
consent of stockholders; however, in case
the parent corporation is not the
surviving corporation, the proposed
merger shall be approved by a majority of
the outstanding stock of the parent
corporation entitled to vote at a duly
called stockholder meeting |
|
|
|
Any mortgage, pledge of or creation of a security
interest in all or any part of the corporate property
may be authorized without the vote or consent of the
shareholders, unless otherwise provided for in the
articles of incorporation or approval off the
shareholders is required pursuant to the BCA
|
|
Any mortgage or pledge of a
corporations property and assets may be
authorized without vote or consent of
stockholders, except to the extent that
the certificate of incorporation
otherwise provides |
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
Board must consist of at least one member
|
|
Board must consist of at least one
member |
|
|
|
Number of members can be changed by an amendment to
the by-laws, by the shareholders, or by action of the
board under the specific provisions of a bylaw
|
|
Number of board members shall be fixed
by the bylaws, unless the certificate of
incorporation fixes the number of
directors |
|
|
|
If the board is authorized to change the number of
directors, it can only do so by majority of the
entire board and so long as no decrease in the number
shall shorten the term of any incumbent director
|
|
If the number of directors is fixed by
the certificate of incorporation, a
change in the number shall be made only
by an amendment of the certificate |
|
|
|
|
|
Removal |
|
|
|
Any or all of the directors may be removed for
cause by vote of the shareholders
|
|
Any or all of the directors may be
removed, with or without cause, by the
holders of a majority of the shares
entitled to vote unless the certificate
of incorporation otherwise provides |
|
|
|
If the articles of incorporation or the by-laws
so provide, any or all of the directors may be
removed without cause by vote of the shareholders
|
|
In the case of a classified board,
stockholders may effect removal of any or
all directors only for cause |
84
|
|
|
Marshall Islands |
|
Delaware |
Dissenters Rights of Appraisal
|
|
|
|
With limited exceptions, including for the shares
of any class or series of stock listed on a
securities exchange or admitted for trading on an
interdealer quotation system, shareholders have a
right to dissent from a merger or sale of all or
substantially all assets not made in the usual course
of business, and receive payment of the fair value of
their shares
|
|
With limited exceptions, including for
the shares of any class or series of
stock listed on a national securities
exchange, appraisal rights shall be
available for the shares of any class or
series of stock of a corporation in a
merger or consolidation |
|
|
|
A holder of any adversely affected shares who does
not vote on or consent in writing to an amendment to
the articles of incorporation has the right to
dissent and to receive payment for such shares if the
amendment: |
|
|
|
|
|
Alters or abolishes any preferential right of any
outstanding shares having preference; or |
|
|
|
|
|
Creates, alters or abolishes any provision or
right in respect to the redemption of any
outstanding shares; or |
|
|
|
|
|
Alters or abolishes any preemptive right of such
holder to acquire shares or other securities; or |
|
|
|
|
|
Excludes or limits the right of such holder to
vote on any matter, except as such right may be
limited by the voting rights given to new shares
then being authorized of any existing or new class |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Derivative Actions
|
|
|
|
An action may be brought in the right of a
corporation to procure a judgment in its favor, by a
holder of shares or of voting trust certificates or
of a beneficial interest in such shares or
certificates. It shall be made to appear that the
plaintiff is such a holder at the time of the
transaction of which he complains, or that has shares
or his interest therein devolved upon him by
operation of law
|
|
In any derivative suit instituted by a
stockholder of a corporation, it shall be
averred in the complaint that the
plaintiff was a stockholder of the
corporation at the time of the
transaction of which he complains or such
stockholders stock must have thereafter
devolved upon such stockholder by
operation of law |
|
|
|
Complaint shall set forth with particularity the
efforts of the plaintiff to secure the initiation of
such action by the board or the reasons for not
making such effort
|
|
Other requirements regarding derivative
suits have been created by judicial
decision, including that a stockholder
may not bring a derivative suit unless he
or she first demands that the corporation
sue on its own behalf and that demand is
refused (unless it is shown that such
demand would have been futile) |
|
|
|
Such action shall not be discontinued, compromised
or settled, without the approval of the High Court of
the Republic |
|
|
|
|
|
Reasonable expenses including attorneys fees may
be awarded if the action is successful |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation may require a plaintiff bringing a
derivative suit to give security for reasonable
expenses if the plaintiff owns less than 5% of any
class of stock and shares have a value of less than
$50,000 |
|
|
85
TAXATION
The following is a discussion of the material Marshall Islands and United States federal
income tax consequences relevant to an investment decision by a U.S. Holder, as defined below, with
respect to the common stock. This discussion does not purport to deal with the tax consequences of
owning common stock to all categories of investors, some of which, such as dealers in securities,
investors whose functional currency is not the United States dollar, and investors that own,
actually or under applicable constructive ownership rules, 10% or more of the voting power of our
stock, may be subject to special rules. This discussion deals only with holders who purchase common
stock in connection with this offering and hold the common stock as a capital asset. You are
encouraged to consult your own tax advisors concerning the overall tax consequences arising in your
own particular situation under United States federal, state, local or foreign law of the ownership
of common stock.
Marshall Islands Tax Consequences
We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands. Under current Marshall Islands law, we are not
subject to tax on income or capital gains, and no Marshall Islands withholding tax will be imposed
upon payments of dividends by us to our stockholders provided such stockholders are not residents
of the Marshall Islands. Holders of our common stock or warrants who are not residents of,
domiciled in, or carrying on any commercial activity in the Marshall Islands will not be subject to
Marshall Islands tax on the sale or other disposition of our common stock or warrants.
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following are the material United States federal income tax consequences to us of our
activities and to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders, each as defined below, of the ownership and
disposition of our common stock. The following discussion of United States federal income tax
matters is based on the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code,
judicial decisions, administrative pronouncements, and existing and proposed regulations issued by
the United States Department of the Treasury, all of which are subject to change, possibly with
retroactive effect. This discussion below is based, in part, upon Treasury Regulations promulgated
under Section 883 of the Code, and in part, on the description of our business as described in
About Our Company above and assumes that we conduct our business as described in that section.
Taxation of Operating Income: In General
Unless exempt from United States federal income taxation under the rules discussed below, a
foreign corporation is subject to United States federal income taxation in respect of any income
that is derived from the use of vessels, from the hiring or leasing of vessels for use on a time,
voyage or bareboat charter basis, from the participation in a shipping pool, partnership, strategic
alliance, joint operating agreement, code sharing arrangements or other joint venture it directly
or indirectly owns or participates in that generates such income, or from the performance of
services directly related to those uses, which we refer to as shipping income, to the extent that
the shipping income is derived from sources within the United States. For these purposes, 50% of
shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both
begin and end, in the United States, exclusive of certain U.S. territories and possessions,
constitutes income from sources within the United States, which we refer to as U.S.-Source Gross
Transportation Income or USSGTI.
Shipping income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the United States
is considered to be 100% from sources within the United States. U.S. law prohibits us from engaging
in transportation that produces income considered to be 100% from sources within the United States.
Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-U.S. ports will be
considered to be 100% derived from sources outside the United States. Shipping income derived from
sources outside the United States will not be subject to any United States federal income tax.
In the absence of exemption from tax under Section 883, our USSGTI would be subject to a 4%
tax imposed without allowance for deductions as described below.
86
Exemption of Operating Income from United States Federal Income Taxation
Under Section 883 of the Code, we will be exempt from United States federal income taxation on
our U.S.-source shipping income if:
|
|
|
we are organized in a foreign country (our country of organization) that
grants an equivalent exemption to corporations organized in the United States; and
either |
|
|
|
|
more than 50% of the value of our stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by
qualified shareholders, that are persons (i) who are residents of our country of
organization or of another foreign country that grants an equivalent exemption to
corporations organized in the United States, and (ii) who comply with certain
documentation requirements, which we refer to as the 50% Ownership Test, or |
|
|
|
|
our stock is primarily and regularly traded on one or more established
securities markets in our country of organization, in another country that grants an
equivalent exemption to United States corporations, or in the United States, which we
refer to as the Publicly-Traded Test. |
The Republic of the Marshall Islands, the jurisdiction where we and our shipowning
subsidiaries are incorporated, grants equivalent exemptions to United States corporations.
Therefore, we will be exempt from United States federal income taxation with respect to our
U.S.-source shipping income if we satisfy either the 50% Ownership Test or the Publicly-Traded
Test.
Since the 2007 tax year, we have claimed the benefits of the Section 883 tax exemption for our
ship-owning subsidiaries on the basis of the Publicly-Traded Test. For 2010 and subsequent tax
years, we anticipate that we will need to satisfy the Publicly-Traded Test in order to qualify for
benefits under Section 883. While we expect to satisfy the Publicly-Traded Test for such years,
there can be no assurance in this regards. Our ability to satisfy the Publicly-Traded Test is
discussed below.
The regulations provide, in pertinent part, that the stock of a foreign corporation will be
considered to be primarily traded on an established securities market in a country if the number
of shares of each class of stock that are traded during the taxable year on all established
securities markets in that country exceed the number of shares in each such class that are traded
during that year on established securities markets in any other single country. Our common stock,
our sole class of our issued and outstanding stock, is primarily traded on the NASDAQ Global
Market.
Under the regulations, our stock will be considered to be regularly traded if one or more
classes of our stock representing 50% or more of our outstanding shares, by total combined voting
power of all classes of stock entitled to vote and by total combined value of all classes of stock,
are listed on one or more established securities markets, which we refer to as the listing
threshold. Our common stock, our sole class of issued and outstanding stock, is listed on the
NASDAQ Global Market, and accordingly, we will satisfy this listing requirement.
The regulations further require that with respect to each class of stock relied upon to meet
the listing requirement: (i) such class of the stock is traded on the market, other than in minimal
quantities, on at least 60 days during the taxable year or 1/6 of the days in a short taxable year;
and (ii) the aggregate number of shares of such class of stock traded on such market is at least
10% of the average number of shares of such class of stock outstanding during such year or as
appropriately adjusted in the case of a short taxable year. We believe we will satisfy the trading
frequency and trading volume tests. Even if this were not the case, the regulations provide that
the trading frequency and trading volume tests will be deemed satisfied by a class of stock if, as
we expect to be the case with our common stock, such class of stock is traded on an established
market in the United States and such class of stock is regularly quoted by dealers making a market
in such stock.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the regulations provide, in pertinent part, that a class of
stock will not be considered to be regularly traded on an established securities market for any
taxable year in which 50% or more of the vote and value of the outstanding shares of such class of
stock are owned, actually or constructively under specified stock attribution rules, on more than
half the days during the taxable year by persons who each own directly or indirectly 5% or more of
the vote and value of such class of stock, who we refer to as 5% Shareholders. We refer to this
restriction in the regulations as the Closely-Held Test. The Closely-Held Test will not
disqualify
87
us, however, if we can establish that our qualified 5% Shareholders own sufficient shares in
our closely-held block of stock to preclude the shares in the closely-held block that are owned by
non-qualified 5% Shareholders from representing 50% or more of the value of such class of stock for
more than half of the days during the tax year, which we refer to as the exception to the
Closely-Held Test.
Establishing such qualification and ownership by our direct and indirect 5% Shareholders will
depend on their meeting the requirements of one of the qualified shareholder tests set out under
the regulations applicable to 5% Shareholders and compliance with certain ownership certification
procedures by each intermediary or other person in the chain of ownership between us and such
qualified 5% Shareholders. Further, the regulations require, and we must certify, that no person in
the chain of qualified ownership of shares relied on by us to qualify for exemption holds those
shares in bearer form.
For purposes of being able to determine our 5% Shareholders, the regulations permit us to rely
on Schedule 13G and Schedule 13D filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
regulations further provide that an investment company that is registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended, will not be treated as a 5% Shareholder for such purposes.
There can be no assurance regarding whether we will be subject to the Closely-Held Test for
any year or whether in circumstances where it would otherwise apply we will be able to qualify for
the exception to the Closely-Held Test. For this and other reasons, there can be no assurance that
we or any of our subsidiaries will qualify for the benefits of Section 883 of the Code for any
year.
Taxation in Absence of Exemption
To the extent the benefits of Section 883 are unavailable, our USSGTI, to the extent not
considered to be effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business, as described
below, would be subject to a 4% tax imposed by Section 887 of the Code on a gross basis, without
the benefit of deductions, otherwise referred to as the 4% Tax. Since under the sourcing rules
described above, no more than 50% of our shipping income would be treated as being derived from
U.S. sources, the maximum effective rate of U.S. federal income tax on our shipping income would
never exceed 2% under the 4% gross basis tax regime.
To the extent the benefits of the Section 883 exemption are unavailable and our USSGTI is
considered to be effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business, as described
below, any such effectively connected U.S.-source shipping income, net of applicable deductions,
would be subject to the U.S. federal corporate income tax currently imposed at rates of up to 35%.
In addition, we may be subject to the 30% branch profits taxes on earnings effectively connected
with the conduct of such trade or business, as determined after allowance for certain adjustments,
and on certain interest paid or deemed paid attributable to the conduct of its U.S. trade or
business.
Our U.S.-source shipping income would be considered effectively connected with the conduct
of a U.S. trade or business only if:
|
|
|
We have, or are considered to have, a fixed place of business in the United
States involved in the earning of shipping income; and |
|
|
|
|
substantially all of our U.S.-source shipping income is attributable to
regularly scheduled transportation, such as the operation of a vessel that follows a
published schedule with repeated sailings at regular intervals between the same points
for voyages that begin or end in the United States. |
We do not intend to have, or permit circumstances that would result in having any vessel
operating to the United States on a regularly scheduled basis. Based on the foregoing and on the
expected mode of our shipping operations and other activities, we believe that none of our
U.S.-source shipping income will be effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or
business.
88
United States Taxation of Gain on Sale of Vessels
Regardless of whether we qualify for exemption under Section 883, we will not be subject to
United States federal income taxation with respect to gain realized on a sale of a vessel, provided
the sale is considered to occur outside of the United States under United States federal income tax
principles. In general, a sale of a vessel will be considered to occur outside of the United States
for this purpose if title to the vessel, and risk of loss with respect to the vessel, pass to the
buyer outside of the United States. It is expected that any sale of a vessel by us will be
considered to occur outside of the United States.
United States Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders
As used herein, the term U.S. Holder means a beneficial owner of common stock that is a
United States citizen or resident, United States corporation or other United States entity taxable
as a corporation, an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation
regardless of its source, or a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise
primary jurisdiction over the administration of the trust and one or more United States persons
have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
If a partnership holds our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend
upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in
a partnership holding our common stock, you are encouraged to consult your tax advisor.
Distributions. Subject to the discussion of passive foreign investment companies below, any
distributions made by us with respect to our common stock to a U.S. Holder will generally
constitute dividends, which may be taxable as ordinary income or qualified dividend income as
described in more detail below, to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits,
as determined under United States federal income tax principles. Distributions in excess of our
earnings and profits will be treated first as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the
U.S. Holders tax basis in his common stock on a dollar-for-dollar basis and thereafter as capital
gain. Because we are not a United States corporation, U.S. Holders that are corporations will not
be entitled to claim a dividends received deduction with respect to any distributions they receive
from us. Dividends paid with respect to our common stock will generally be treated as passive
category income or, in the case of certain types of U.S. Holders, general category income for
purposes of computing allowable foreign tax credits for United States foreign tax credit purposes.
Dividends paid on our common stock to a U.S. Holder who is an individual, trust or estate,
which we refer to as a U.S. Individual Holder, will generally be treated as qualified dividend
income that is taxable to such a U.S. Individual Holder at
preferential tax rates (through 2012)
provided that (1) we are not a passive foreign investment company for the taxable year during which
the dividend is paid or the immediately preceding taxable year (which we do not believe we are,
have been or will be), (2) our common stock is readily tradable on an established securities market
in the United States (such as the NASDAQ Global Market), and (3) the U.S. Individual Holder has
owned the common stock for more than 60 days in the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the
date on which the common stock becomes ex-dividend. There is no assurance that any dividends paid
on our common stock will be eligible for these preferential rates in the hands of a U.S. Individual
Holder. Any distributions treated as dividends paid by us that are not eligible for these
preferential rates will be taxed as ordinary income to a U.S. Individual Holder.
Special rules may apply to any extraordinary dividend generally, a dividend in an amount
which is equal to or in excess of ten percent of a stockholders adjusted basis (or fair market
value in certain circumstances) in a share of our stock paid by us. If we pay an extraordinary
dividend on our stock that is treated as qualified dividend income, then any loss derived by a
U.S. Individual Holder from the sale or exchange of such stock will be treated as long-term capital
loss to the extent of such dividend.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Common Stock. Assuming we do not constitute a passive
foreign investment company for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable
gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock in an amount equal to
the difference between the amount realized by the U.S. Holder from such sale, exchange or other
disposition and the U.S. Holders tax basis in such stock. Such gain or loss will be treated as
long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holders holding period is greater than one year at the
time of the sale, exchange or other disposition. Such capital gain or loss will generally be
treated
89
as U.S.-source income or loss, as applicable, for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. A U.S.
Holders ability to deduct capital losses is subject to certain limitations.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant Tax Consequences. Special United
States federal income tax rules apply to a U.S. Holder that holds stock in a foreign corporation
classified as a passive foreign investment company for United States federal income tax purposes.
In general, we will be treated as a passive foreign investment company with respect to a U.S.
Holder if, for any taxable year in which such holder held our common stock, either:
|
|
|
at least 75% of our gross income for such taxable year consists of passive
income (e.g., dividends, interest, capital gains and rents derived other than in the
active conduct of a rental business); or |
|
|
|
|
at least 50% of the average value of the assets held by the corporation during
such taxable year produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. |
For purposes of determining whether we are a passive foreign investment company, we will be
treated as earning and owning our proportionate share of the income and assets, respectively, of
any of our subsidiary corporations in which we own at least 25% of the value of the subsidiarys
stock. Income earned, or deemed earned, by us in connection with the performance of services would
not constitute passive income. By contrast, rental income would generally constitute passive
income unless we were treated under specific rules as deriving our rental income in the active
conduct of a trade or business.
We may hold, directly or indirectly, interests in other entities that are passive foreign
investment companies, or Subsidiary PFICs. If we are a passive foreign investment company, each
U.S. Holder will be treated as owning its pro rata share by value of the stock of any such
Subsidiary PFICs.
Based on our current operations and future projections, we do not believe that we are, nor do
we expect to become, a passive foreign investment company with respect to any taxable year.
Although we are not relying upon an opinion of counsel on this issue, our belief is based
principally on the position that, for purposes of determining whether we are a passive foreign
investment company, the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from the time chartering and
voyage chartering activities of our wholly owned subsidiaries should constitute services income,
rather than rental income. Correspondingly, such income should not constitute passive income, and
the assets that we or our wholly-owned subsidiaries own and operate in connection with the
production of such income, in particular, the vessels, should not constitute passive assets for
purposes of determining whether we are a passive foreign investment company. Internal Revenue
Service pronouncements concerning the characterization of income derived from time charters and
voyage charters as services income for other tax purposes support this position. However, a 2009
case reviewing the deductibility of commissions by a foreign sales corporation decided that time
charter income constituted rental income under the law due to specific characteristics of the time
charters in that case. Tidewater Inc. v. U.S., 565 F.3d 299 (5th Cir., Apr. 13, 2009).
The IRS has stated that it disagrees with and will not acquiesce to the Tidewater decision,
and in
its discussion stated that the time charters at issue in Tidewater would be treated as producing
services income for PFIC purposes. However, the IRSs statement with respect to the Tidewater
decision was an administrative action that cannot be relied upon or otherwise cited as precedent
by taxpayers. Consequently, in the absence of any binding legal authority specifically relating to
the statutory provisions governing PFICs, there can be no assurance that the IRS or a court
would agree with the Tidewater decision. However, if the principles of the Tidewater decision
were applicable to our time charters, we would likely be treated as a PFIC.
In addition, although we intend to
conduct our affairs in a manner to avoid being classified as a passive foreign investment company
with respect to any taxable year, we cannot assure you that the nature of our operations will not
change in the future.
As discussed more fully below, if we were to be treated as a passive foreign investment
company for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder would be subject to different taxation rules depending
on whether the U.S. Holder makes an election to treat us as a Qualified Electing Fund, which
election we refer to as a QEF election. As an alternative to making a QEF election, provided that
our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and are treated as regularly traded on
such market for the year in which the election is made, a U.S. Holder should be able to make a
mark-to-market election with respect to our common stock, as discussed below.
Taxation of U.S. Holders Making a Timely QEF Election. If a U.S. Holder makes a timely QEF
election, which U.S. Holder we refer to as an Electing Holder, the Electing Holder must report
each year for United States federal income tax purposes his pro rata share of our ordinary earnings
and our net capital gain, if any, for our taxable year that ends with or within the taxable year of
the Electing Holder, regardless of whether or not distributions were received from us by the
Electing Holder. The Electing Holders adjusted tax basis in the common
90
stock will be increased to reflect taxed but undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions
of earnings and profits that had been previously taxed will result in a corresponding reduction in
the adjusted tax basis in the common stock and will not be taxed again once distributed. An
Electing Holder would generally recognize capital gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other
disposition of our common stock. A U.S. Holder would make a QEF election with respect to any year
that we are a passive foreign investment company
by reflecting the QEF election on an
IRS Form 8621 filed with his United States
federal income tax return. If we were aware that we were to be treated as a passive foreign
investment company for any taxable year, we would provide each U.S. Holder with all necessary
information in order to make the QEF election described above with respect to our common stock and
the stock of any Subsidiary PFIC.
Taxation of U.S. Holders Making a Mark-to-Market Election. Alternatively, if we were to be
treated as a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year and our common stock is
treated as marketable stock, a U.S. Holder would be allowed to make a mark-to-market election
with respect to our common stock, provided the U.S. Holder completes and files IRS Form 8621
reflecting a mark-to-market election
in
accordance with the relevant instructions and related Treasury Regulations. Since our stock is
listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, our common stock will be treated as marketable stock for this
purpose, provided that our common stock is regularly traded on such market in accordance with
applicable Treasury regulations. If that election is made, the U.S. Holder generally would include
as ordinary income in each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the common
stock at the end of the taxable year over such holders adjusted tax basis in the common stock. The
U.S. Holder would also be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the U.S.
Holders adjusted tax basis in the common stock over its fair market value at the end of the
taxable year, but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of
the mark-to-market election. A U.S. Holders tax basis in his common stock would be adjusted to
reflect any such income or loss amount. Gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of
our common stock would be treated as ordinary income, and any loss realized on the sale, exchange
or other disposition of the common stock would be treated as ordinary loss to the extent that such
loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains previously included by the U.S. Holder. A
mark-to-market election under the passive foreign investment company rules with respect to our
common stock would not apply to a Subsidiary PFIC, and a U.S. Holder would generally not be able to
make such a mark-to-market election in respect of such U.S. Holders indirect interest in a
Subsidiary PFIC. Consequently, U.S. Holders could be subject to the passive foreign investment
company rules with respect to income of a Subsidiary PFIC, the value of which had already been
taken into account indirectly via mark-to-market adjustments with respect to our shares.
Taxation of U.S. Holders Not Making a Timely QEF or Mark-to-Market Election. Finally, if we
were to be treated as a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder who
does not make either a QEF election or a mark-to-market election for that year, whom we refer to
as a Non-Electing Holder, would be subject to special rules with respect to (1) any excess
distribution (i.e., the portion of any distributions received by the Non-Electing Holder on our
common stock in a taxable year in excess of 125% of the average annual distributions received by
the Non-Electing Holder in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the Non-Electing
Holders holding period for the common stock), and (2) any gain realized on the sale, exchange or
other disposition of our common stock. Under these special rules:
|
|
|
the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over the
Non-Electing Holders aggregate holding period for the common stock; |
|
|
|
|
the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any taxable year before we
became a passive foreign investment company would be taxed as ordinary income; and |
|
|
|
|
the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax
at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that
year, and an interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit would be imposed with
respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year. |
These penalties would not apply to a pension or profit sharing trust or other tax-exempt
organization that did not borrow funds or otherwise utilize leverage in connection with its
acquisition of our common stock. If a Non-Electing Holder who is an individual dies while owning
our common stock, such holders successor generally would not receive a step-up in tax basis with
respect to such stock.
91
Note
that, following a recent change in law, a U.S. holder that owns
shares of a PFIC is required to file an annual information return with
the IRS reflecting such ownership, regardless of whether a QEF
election or mark-to-market election is made.
United States Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders
A beneficial owner of common stock that is not a U.S. Holder is referred to herein as a
Non-U.S. Holder.
Dividends on Common Stock. Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to United States
federal income tax or withholding tax on dividends received from us with respect to our common
stock, unless that income is effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holders conduct of a trade or
business in the United States. If the Non-U.S. Holder is entitled to the benefits of a United
States income tax treaty with respect to those dividends, that income is taxable only if it is
attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder in the United States.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Common Stock. Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be
subject to United States federal income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized upon the sale,
exchange or other disposition of our common stock, unless:
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holders conduct of a trade
or business in the United States. If the Non-U.S. Holder is entitled to the benefits of
an income tax treaty with respect to that gain, that gain is taxable only if it is
attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder in the
United States; or |
|
|
|
|
the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more during the taxable year of disposition and other conditions are met. |
If the Non-U.S. Holder is engaged in a United States trade or business for United States
federal income tax purposes, the income from the common stock, including dividends and the gain
from the sale, exchange or other disposition of the stock that is effectively connected with the
conduct of that trade or business will generally be subject to regular United States federal income
tax in the same manner as discussed in the previous section relating to the taxation of U.S.
Holders. In addition, if you are a corporate Non-U.S. Holder, your earnings and profits that are
attributable to the effectively connected income, which are subject to certain adjustments, may be
subject to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30%, or at a lower rate as may be
specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, dividend payments, or other taxable distributions, made within the United States
to you will be subject to information reporting requirements. Such payments will also be subject to
backup withholding tax if you are a non-corporate U.S. Holder and you:
|
|
|
fail to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number; |
|
|
|
|
are notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you have failed to report all
interest or dividends required to be shown on your federal income tax returns; or |
|
|
|
|
|
in certain circumstances, fail to comply with applicable certification
requirements. |
|
Non-U.S. Holders may be required to establish their exemption from information reporting and
backup withholding by certifying their status on Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN, W-8ECI or
W-8IMY, as applicable.
If you sell your stock to or through a United States office or broker, the payment of the
proceeds is subject to both United States backup withholding and information reporting unless you
certify that you are a non-U.S. person, under penalties of perjury, or you otherwise establish an
exemption. If you sell your stock through a non-United States office of a non-United States broker
and the sales proceeds are paid to you outside the United States, then information reporting and
backup withholding generally will not apply to that payment. However, United States information
reporting requirements, but not backup withholding, will apply to a payment of sales proceeds, even
if that payment is made to you outside the United States, if you sell your stock through a
non-United States office of a broker that is a United States person or has some other contacts with
the United States.
92
Backup withholding tax is not an additional tax. Rather, you generally may obtain a refund of
any amounts withheld under backup withholding rules that exceed your income tax liability by filing
a refund claim with the Internal Revenue Service.
We encourage each stockholder to consult with his, her or its own tax advisor as to particular
tax consequences to it of holding and disposing of our shares, including the applicability of any
state, local or foreign tax laws and any proposed changes in applicable law.
93
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Subject to the terms and conditions of the placement agency agreement between us and Dahlman
Rose & Company, LLC, the placement agent, the placement agent has agreed to arrange for the
purchase of the following number of shares of our common stock at the public offering price on the
cover page of this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placement Agent
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC
The address for Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC is 1301 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York
10019.
The placement agent is not purchasing any of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus nor is it required to arrange for the purchase or sale of any specific number or dollar
amount of the shares, but has agreed to use best efforts to arrange for the sale of all of the
shares offered.
There is no requirement that any minimum number of shares of common stock or dollar amount of
shares be sold in this offering and there can be no assurance that we will sell all or any of the
shares being offered. The placement agent proposes to arrange for the sale to one or more
purchasers of the shares offered pursuant to this prospectus pursuant to the terms of the placement
agency agreement.
The public offering price on the cover page of this prospectus was determined based upon arms
length negotiations between us and the placement agent.
We intend that the offering will remain open for a period of seven (7) days from the initial
announcement of the offering on , 2011. Because there is no minimum offering
amount required as a condition to closing this offering, we will close and sell that number of
shares of common stock that have been placed as of the closing date, even if such number of shares
is less than the maximum amount offered under this prospectus. Confirmations and definitive
prospectuses will be distributed to all investors who agree to purchase the shares, informing them
of the closing date of the offering. We currently anticipate that the closing of this offering
will take place no later than , 2011. However, if and when the offering has been
fully subscribed, we and the placement agent may agree to close the offering earlier than the
currently anticipated closing date. Investors will also be informed of the date and manner in
which they must transmit the purchase price for their shares of common stock.
The placement agency agreement provides that the placement agents obligation to place the
shares of common stock depends on the satisfaction of the conditions contained in the placement
agency agreement including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
the representations and warranties made by us to the placement agent are true; |
|
|
|
|
there is no adverse material change in our business; and |
|
|
|
|
we deliver customary closing documents to the placement agent. |
Additionally, the obligations of the placement agent under the placement agency agreement
may be terminated at the discretion of Dahlman Rose & Company LLC upon the occurrence of certain
stated events. We have agreed to indemnify the placement agent, its affiliates, and its members,
partners, and its directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives against certain
liabilities and expenses, related to the offering, including liabilities under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended. We have also agreed to contribute to payments the placement agent may be
required to make in respect of such liabilities.
We have granted the placement agent an agents option to place up to an additional
shares of our common stock at the same price as the offering price to the public. The agents
option is exercisable, in whole or in part, at the sole option of Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, as
placement agent, at any time up to two business days
94
prior to the closing of the offering. The placement agent may exercise this agents option
solely to cover any over-subscriptions, if any, made in connection with this offering.
The following table shows the per share and total placement agents fees to be paid to the
placement agent by us. The information assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the placement
agent of the agents option to place additional shares of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Per |
|
No |
|
Full |
|
|
Share |
|
Exercise |
|
Exercise |
Purchase price |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
Placement agent fees to be paid by us |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
Proceeds, before expenses, to us |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to closing in this
offering, the actual total offering fees, if any, are not presently determinable and may be
substantially less than the maximum amount set forth above. The estimated offering expenses
payable by us, exclusive of the agents fees are approximately
$ .
We and each of our officers and directors and certain shareholders have agreed that, subject
to specified exceptions, without the prior written consent of Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, we and
they will not, during the period ending 75 days from the date of this prospectus:
|
|
|
directly or indirectly, offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or
contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right
or warrant to purchase or otherwise transfer or dispose of any shares of common stock
or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our common stock
or file any registration statement under the Securities Act with respect to any of the
foregoing; or |
|
|
|
|
enter into any swap or any other agreement or any transaction that transfers, in
whole or in part, directly or indirectly, the economic consequence of ownership of
common stock; |
whether any such transaction described above is to be settled by delivery of shares of common stock
or such other securities, in cash or otherwise. In addition, each such person agrees that, without
the prior written consent of Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, it will not, during the period ending 75
days after the date of this prospectus, exercise any right with respect to the registration of any
shares of common stock or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares
of common stock.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if (i) during the last 17 days of the 75-day restricted period,
we issue an earnings release or material news or a material event relating to our company occurs;
or (ii) prior to the expiration of the 75-day restricted period, we announce that we will release
earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the 75 day restricted
period, the restrictions described above shall continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the occurrence of the material news or
material event
This prospectus in electronic format may be made available on Internet sites or through other
online services maintained by the placement agent of this offering, or by its affiliates. Other
than any prospectus made available in electronic format in this manner, the information on any
website containing this prospectus is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of
which this prospectus forms a part, and such information has not been approved or endorsed by us or
the placement agent in such capacity and should not be relied on by prospective investors.
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol FREE.
95
Notice to Prospective Investors in the European Economic Area
In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area that has implemented the
Prospectus Directive (each, a relevant member state), with effect from and including the date on
which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that relevant member state (the relevant
implementation date), an offer of shares described in this prospectus may not be made to the public
in that relevant member state prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the shares
that has been approved by the competent authority in that relevant member state or, where
appropriate, approved in another relevant member state and notified to the competent authority in
that relevant member state, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that, with
effect from and including the relevant implementation date, an offer of securities may be offered
to the public in that relevant member state at any time:
|
|
|
to any legal entity that is authorized or regulated to
operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized
or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest
in securities; |
|
|
|
|
to any legal entity that has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year;
(2) a total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000 and (3)
an annual net turnover of more than 50,000,000, as shown
in its last annual or consolidated accounts; |
|
|
|
|
to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than
qualified investors as defined below) subject to obtaining
the prior consent of the representatives for any such
offer; or |
|
|
|
|
in any other circumstances that do not require the
publication of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the
Prospectus Directive. |
Each purchaser of shares described in this prospectus supplement located within a
relevant member state will be deemed to have represented, acknowledged and agreed that it is a
qualified investor within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive.
For purposes of this provision, the expression an offer to the public in any relevant member
state means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms
of the offer and the securities to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or
subscribe the securities, as the expression may be varied in that member state by any measure
implementing the Prospectus Directive in that member state, and the expression Prospectus
Directive means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in each
relevant member state.
The sellers of the shares have not authorized and do not authorize the making of any offer of
shares through any financial intermediary on their behalf, other than the
placement agent with a view to the final placement of the shares as contemplated in this prospectus.
Notice to Prospective Investors in the United Kingdom
This prospectus is only being distributed to, and is only directed at, persons in the United
Kingdom that are qualified investors within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus
Directive that are also (i) investment professionals falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the Order) or (ii) high net worth
entities, and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated, falling within Article
49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (each such person being referred to as a relevant person). This
prospectus and its contents are confidential and should not be distributed, published or reproduced
(in whole or in part) or disclosed by recipients to any other persons in the United Kingdom. Any
person in the United Kingdom that is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this document
or any of its contents.
96
EXPENSES RELATING TO THIS OFFERING
Set forth below is an itemization of the total expenses that we expect to incur in connection
with this distribution. With the exception of the SEC registration fee, all amounts are estimates.
|
|
|
|
|
SEC Registration Fee |
|
$ |
[837] |
|
Printing Expenses |
|
$ |
[___] |
|
Legal Fees and Expenses |
|
$ |
[___] |
|
Accounting Fees and Expenses |
|
$ |
[___] |
|
NASDAQ Fee |
|
$ |
[___] |
|
FINRA Fee |
|
$ |
[___] |
|
Transfer Agent Fees |
|
$ |
[___] |
|
Miscellaneous |
|
$ |
[___] |
|
Total |
|
$ |
[___] |
|
The above expenses will be paid by us.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the
shares of our common stock
offered in this prospectus are being passed upon for us by
Reeder & Simpson, P.C., special Marshall Islands counsel for FreeSeas. Broad and Cassel, Miami,
Florida, a general partnership including professional associations, is acting as counsel to
FreeSeas connection with United States securities laws. Certain legal matters in connection with
this offering will be passed upon for the placement agent by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, New
York.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of FreeSeas at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the
years then ended, appearing in this prospectus and registration statement have been audited by
Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors Accountants S.A., independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in its report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and is included in
reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing. The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in
this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers SA, an
independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in
auditing and accounting.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
In May 2009, our audit committee determined to engage Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified
Auditors Accountants S.A. in Athens, Greece as our independent registered public accounting firm
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, replacing
PricewaterhouseCoopers, S.A., or PwC. This
change was ratified by our shareholders at our annual meeting held on September 17, 2009. The
replacement of PwC was not a result of any disagreements with them on any matter of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing
scope or procedure. PwCs
report on FreeSeas financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 did
not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion nor was such report qualified or modified
as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed a registration statement on Form F-1 with the SEC in connection with this
offering. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statement, as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. Each statement made in this
prospectus concerning a document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement is qualified by
reference to that exhibit for a complete statement of its provisions.
We also file annual and others reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and
copy any report or document we file, and the registration statement, including the exhibits, may be
inspected at the SECs public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-
97
0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available
to the public from the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
Quotations for the prices of our common stock and warrants currently appear on the NASDAQ
Global Market.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy
statements to shareholders. Although we have opted out of the NASDAQ rules requiring NASDAQ-listed
companies to provide proxy statements to shareholders, we currently expect to continue to furnish
proxy statements to our shareholders. Those proxy statements are not expected to conform to
Schedule 14A of the proxy rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. In addition, as a foreign
private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act relating to short swing profit
reporting and liability.
98
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of FreeSeas Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of FreeSeas Inc. as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and
cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We
were not engaged to perform an audit of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of FreeSeas Inc. at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and
the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst
& Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors
Accountants S.A.
Athens, Greece
March 29, 2011
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of FreeSeas Inc.:
In our opinion, the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 2008 present fairly, in all material respects, the results of
operations and cash flows of FreeSeas Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A.
Athens
April 14, 2009, except for the effects of a reverse stock split effective October 1, 2010 discussed
in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the
date is March 29, 2011.
F-3
FREESEAS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(All amounts in tables in thousands of United States dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,694 |
|
|
$ |
6,341 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Trade receivables, net of provision of $1,385 and $1,443 for 2010 and 2009 respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
Insurance claims |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
9,240 |
|
Due from related party |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
Prepayments and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
Vessel held for sale |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
13,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,691 |
|
|
$ |
22,125 |
|
Advances for vessels under construction |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels, net |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
213,691 |
|
|
|
270,701 |
|
Deferred charges, net |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
2,995 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
223,293 |
|
|
$ |
275,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
250,984 |
|
|
$ |
297,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,323 |
|
|
$ |
10,746 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
Unearned revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
Due to related party |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Derivative financial instruments current portion |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
Deferred revenue current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
Bank loans current portion |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
23,022 |
|
|
|
15,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,819 |
|
|
$ |
29,488 |
|
Derivative financial instruments net of current portion |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
Deferred revenue net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
Bank loans net of current portion |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
97,437 |
|
|
|
122,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
97,975 |
|
|
$ |
123,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized, 6,487,852 and 6,497,852
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,634 |
|
|
|
127,075 |
|
Retained earnings/ (Accumulated deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,450 |
) |
|
|
17,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
123,190 |
|
|
$ |
144,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
250,984 |
|
|
$ |
297,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
F-4
FREESEAS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(All amounts in tables in thousands of United States dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
OPERATING REVENUES |
|
$ |
57,650 |
|
|
$ |
57,533 |
|
|
$ |
66,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
(1,887 |
) |
|
|
(1,394 |
) |
|
|
(527 |
) |
Commissions |
|
|
(3,357 |
) |
|
|
(3,089 |
) |
|
|
(3,383 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
(18,607 |
) |
|
|
(17,813 |
) |
|
|
(16,354 |
) |
Depreciation expense (Note 5) |
|
|
(15,365 |
) |
|
|
(16,006 |
) |
|
|
(13,349 |
) |
Amortization of deferred charges (Note 7) |
|
|
(1,888 |
) |
|
|
(1,742 |
) |
|
|
(788 |
) |
Management and other fees to a related party (Note 4) |
|
|
(1,978 |
) |
|
|
(1,874 |
) |
|
|
(2,634 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(4,494 |
) |
|
|
(4,156 |
) |
|
|
(2,863 |
) |
Provision and write-offs of insurance claims and bad debts |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
Gains on sale of vessel (Note 5) |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel impairment loss (Note 5) |
|
|
(26,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
(17,000 |
) |
|
$ |
11,459 |
|
|
$ |
26,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and finance costs |
|
|
(4,375 |
) |
|
|
(4,323 |
) |
|
|
(6,453 |
) |
Loss on derivative instruments (Note 9) |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(1,456 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
Other |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
(4,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,600 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(21,821 |
) |
|
$ |
6,859 |
|
|
$ |
19,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(3.46 |
) |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
4.57 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(3.46 |
) |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
Basic weighted average number of shares |
|
|
6,313,606 |
|
|
|
5,092,772 |
|
|
|
4,201,299 |
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares |
|
|
6,313,606 |
|
|
|
5,092,772 |
|
|
|
4,210,393 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
F-5
FREESEAS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(All amounts in tables in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Notes 1 and |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13) |
|
|
Shares $ |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
(Accumulated deficit) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007 |
|
|
4,149,047 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
115,481 |
|
|
$ |
(2,858 |
) |
|
$ |
112,627 |
|
Dividend payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,335 |
) |
|
|
(5,822 |
) |
|
|
(13,157 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants |
|
|
35,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
836 |
|
Stock issued upon exercise of options |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,192 |
|
|
|
19,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008 |
|
|
4,234,622 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
110,339 |
|
|
$ |
10,512 |
|
|
$ |
120,855 |
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
2,008,230 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
16,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,244 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494 |
|
Restricted shares issued |
|
|
255,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,859 |
|
|
|
6,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2009 |
|
|
6,497,852 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
127,075 |
|
|
$ |
17,371 |
|
|
$ |
144,452 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559 |
|
Restricted shares forfeited |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,821 |
) |
|
|
(21,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
|
6,487,852 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
127,634 |
|
|
$ |
(4,450 |
) |
|
$ |
123,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
FREESEAS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(All amounts in tables in thousands of United States Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(21,821 |
) |
|
$ |
6,859 |
|
|
$ |
19,192 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation (Note 5) |
|
|
15,365 |
|
|
|
16,006 |
|
|
|
13,349 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees (Note 7) |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Amortization of deferred dry-docking and special survey costs (Note 7) |
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
Provision and write-offs of insurance claims and bad debts |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
Stock compensation cost (Note 14) |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Write off of deferred financing fees (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
Change in fair value of derivatives (Note 9) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
1,061 |
|
Amortization of deferred revenue |
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(368 |
) |
Gain on sale of vessel (Note 5) |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel impairment loss |
|
|
26,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back log asset (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Trade receivables |
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
|
|
(973 |
) |
-Insurance claims |
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
8,567 |
|
|
|
(1,691 |
) |
-Due from related party |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
(597 |
) |
-Inventories |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
-Prepayments and other |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(638 |
) |
-Accounts payable |
|
|
(3,164 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
7,735 |
|
-Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(10,037 |
|
|
|
(5,366 |
) |
-Unearned revenue |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(904 |
) |
|
|
537 |
|
-Due to related party |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Dry-docking and special survey costs paid (Note 7) |
|
|
(2,547 |
) |
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
(2,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash from Operating Activities |
|
$ |
20,802 |
|
|
$ |
21,391 |
|
|
$ |
32,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from (used in) Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel acquisitions (Note 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,302 |
) |
|
|
(182,539 |
) |
Advances for vessels under construction (Note 6) |
|
|
(5,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of vessel, net |
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash used in Investing Activities |
|
$ |
(2,819 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,302 |
) |
|
$ |
(182,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from (used in) Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(3,130 |
) |
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
(2,245 |
) |
Proceeds from long term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
153,650 |
|
Payments of bank loans |
|
|
(17,500 |
) |
|
|
(28,391 |
) |
|
|
(49,600 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs (Note 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of warrants (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
836 |
|
Exercise of stock options (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Common stock dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,157 |
) |
Financing fees (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
(774 |
) |
Net Cash from / (used in) Financing Activities |
|
$ |
(20,630 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,126 |
) |
|
$ |
89,960 |
|
|
|
|
Net increase /(decrease) in cash in hand and at bank |
|
$ |
(2,647 |
) |
|
$ |
2,963 |
|
|
$ |
(60,016 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
6,341 |
|
|
|
3,378 |
|
|
|
63,394 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
3,694 |
|
|
$ |
6,341 |
|
|
$ |
3,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
4,017 |
|
|
$ |
4,462 |
|
|
$ |
4,410 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
F-7
FREESEAS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
1. |
|
Basis of Presentation and General Information |
|
|
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FreeSeas Inc. and
its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company or FreeSeas). FreeSeas, formerly
known as Adventure Holdings S.A., was incorporated in the Marshall Islands on April 23, 2004
for the purpose of being the ultimate holding company of ship-owning companies. The
management of FreeSeas vessels is performed by Free Bulkers S.A. (the Manager), a Marshall
Islands company that is controlled by the Chief Executive Officer of FreeSeas (see Note 4). |
|
|
|
|
Effective October 1, 2010, the Company effected a five-to-one reverse stock split on its
issued and outstanding common stock (Note 13). All share and per share amounts disclosed in
the Financial Statements give effect to this reverse stock split retroactively, for all
periods presented. |
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company owned and operated eight Handysize (one
of which was sold on August 2010), two Handymax dry bulk carriers and placed an order for the
construction of two Handysize bulk carriers. As of December 31, 2010, FreeSeas is the sole
owner of all outstanding shares of the following ship-owning subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Built/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of |
|
Date of |
|
Date of |
Company |
|
Owned |
|
M/V |
|
Type |
|
Dwt |
|
Delivery |
|
Acquisition |
|
Disposal |
Adventure Two S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Destiny |
|
Handysize |
|
|
25,240 |
|
|
|
1982 |
|
|
|
08/04/04 |
|
|
|
08/27/10 |
|
Adventure Three S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Envoy |
|
Handysize |
|
|
26,318 |
|
|
|
1984 |
|
|
|
09/29/04 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Adventure Four S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Fighter |
|
Handysize |
|
|
38,905 |
|
|
|
1982 |
|
|
|
06/14/05 |
|
|
|
04/27/07 |
|
Adventure Five S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Goddess |
|
Handysize |
|
|
22,051 |
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
10/30/07 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Adventure Six S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Hero |
|
Handysize |
|
|
24,318 |
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
07/03/07 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Adventure Seven S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Knight |
|
Handysize |
|
|
24,111 |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
03/19/08 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Adventure Eight S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Jupiter |
|
Handymax |
|
|
47,777 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
09/05/07 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Adventure Nine S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Impala |
|
Handysize |
|
|
24,111 |
|
|
|
1997 |
|
|
|
04/02/08 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Adventure Ten S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Lady |
|
Handymax |
|
|
50,246 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
07/07/08 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Adventure Eleven S.A |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Maverick |
|
Handysize |
|
|
23,994 |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
09/01/08 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Adventure Twelve S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Free Neptune |
|
Handysize |
|
|
30,838 |
|
|
|
1996 |
|
|
|
08/25/09 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Adventure Fourteen S.A. |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Hull 1 |
|
Handysize |
|
|
33,600 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Adventure Fifteen S.A |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Hull 2 |
|
Handysize |
|
|
33,600 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
2. |
|
Significant Accounting Policies |
|
a) |
|
Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and include in each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2010 the accounts and operating results of the Company
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries referred to in Note 1 above. All significant
inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
FreeSeas as the holding company determines whether it has a controlling financial
interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest
|
F-8
FREESEAS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
entity or a variable interest entity. Under ASC 810 Consolidation, (formerly ARB No.
51) a voting interest entity is an entity in which the total equity investment at risk
is sufficient to enable the entity to finance itself independently and provides the
equity holders with the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual
returns and the right to make financial and operating decisions. The holding company
consolidates voting interest entities in which it owns all, or at least a majority
(generally, greater than 50%) of the voting interest. Variable interest entities
(VIE) are entities as defined under ASC 810 that in general either do not have equity
investors with voting rights or that have equity investors that do not provide
sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. The
determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity
is based on, among other things, the other entitys design and purpose and the
reporting entitys power, through voting or similar rights, to direct the activities of
the other entity that most significantly impact the other entitys economic
performance. A controlling financial interest in a VIE is present when a company has
the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially
be significant to the VIE, or both. Only one reporting entity, known as the primary
beneficiary, is expected to be identified as having a controlling financial interest
and thus is required to consolidate the VIE. The Company evaluates all arrangements
that may include a variable interest in an entity to determine if it may be the primary
beneficiary, and would be required to include assets, liabilities and operations of a
VIE in its consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, no such
interest existed. |
|
|
b) |
|
Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. |
|
|
c) |
|
Comprehensive Income: The Company follows the provisions of ASC 220,
Comprehensive Income, which requires separate presentation of certain transactions,
which are recorded directly as components of stockholders equity. For the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 comprehensive income was the same as net income. |
|
|
d) |
|
Concentration of Credit Risk: Financial instruments, which potentially subject
the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash
and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, insurance claims and derivative
contracts (interest rate swaps). The Company places its cash and cash equivalents,
consisting mostly of deposits, with high credit qualified financial institutions. The
Company monitors the credit risk regarding charterers turnover in order to review its
reliance on individual charterers. The Company does not obtain rights to collateral to
reduce its credit risk. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of
non-performance by counter parties to derivative instruments; however, the Company
limits its exposure by diversifying among counter parties with high credit ratings.
Credit risk with respect to trade account receivable is considered high due to the fact
that the Companys total income is derived from a few charterers. During the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 three charterers individually accounted for more than
10% of the Companys voyage revenues as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charterer |
|
FY 2010 |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
A |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
B |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
C |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
Less than 10% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
e) |
|
Foreign Currency Translation: The functional currency of the Company is the U.S.
Dollar because the Companys vessels operate in international shipping markets, and
therefore primarily transact business in U.S. Dollars. The Companys accounting records
are maintained in U.S. Dollars. Transactions involving other currencies during the year
are converted into U.S. Dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the time of the
transactions. At the balance sheet date, monetary assets and |
F-9
FREESEAS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
liabilities, which are denominated in other currencies, are translated into U.S.
Dollars at the year-end exchange rates. Resulting gains or losses are included in other
income/loss in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. |
|
|
f) |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers highly liquid investments such
as time deposits and certificates of deposit with an original maturity of three months
or less to be cash equivalents. |
|
|
g) |
|
Restricted Cash: Restricted cash includes bank deposits that are required under
the Companys borrowing arrangements to be kept as part of the security required under
the respective loan agreements. |
|
|
h) |
|
Trade Receivables, net: The amount shown as Trade Receivables at each balance
sheet date includes receivables from charterers for hire, freight and demurrage
billings, net of an allowance for doubtful debts. An estimate is made of the allowance
for doubtful debts based on a review of all outstanding amounts at year end, and an
allowance is made for any accounts which management believes are not recoverable. |
|
|
i) |
|
Insurance Claims: Insurance claims comprise claims submitted and/or claims in
the process of compilation for submission (claims pending) relating to hull and
machinery or protection and indemnity insurance coverage. They are recorded as incurred
on the accrual basis and represent the claimable expenses incurred, net of deductibles,
the recovery of which is probable under the related insurance policies and the Company
can make an estimate of the amount to be reimbursed. Any non-recoverable amounts are
included in accrued liabilities and depending on their nature, are classified as
operating expenses or voyage expenses in the statement of operations. The classification
of insurance claims (if any) into current and non-current assets is based on
managements expectations as to their collection dates. |
|
|
j) |
|
Inventories: Inventories, which are comprised of bunkers and lubricants
remaining on board of the vessels at year end, are valued at the lower of cost, as
determined on a first-in, first-out basis, or market. |
|
|
k) |
|
Advances for vessels under construction: This account includes milestone payments
relating to the shipbuilding contracts with the shipyard, and various pre-purchase costs
and expenses for which the recognition criteria are met. |
|
|
l) |
|
Vessels Cost: Vessels are stated at cost, which consists of the contract
purchase price and any material expenses incurred upon acquisition (initial repairs,
improvements, delivery expenses and other expenditures to prepare the vessel for her
initial voyage). Subsequent expenditures for conversions and major improvements are also
capitalized when they appreciably extend the life, increase the earning capacity or
improve the efficiency or safety of the vessels. Otherwise, these expenditures are
charged to expense as incurred. |
|
|
m) |
|
Vessels Depreciation: The cost of the Companys vessels is depreciated on a
straight-line basis over the vessels remaining economic useful lives from the
acquisition date, after considering the estimated residual value. Effective April 1,
2009, and following managements reassessment of the useful lives of the Companys
assets, the fleet useful life was increased from 27 to 28 years. Managements estimate
was based on the current vessels operating condition, as well as the conditions
prevailing in the market for the same type of vessels. |
|
|
n) |
|
Vessels held for sale: It is the Companys policy to dispose of vessels when
suitable opportunities arise and not necessarily to keep them until the end of their
useful life. The Company classifies assets and disposal groups of assets as being held
for sale in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, when the following
criteria are met: (i) management possessing the necessary authority has committed to a
plan to sell the asset; (ii) the asset is immediately available for sale on an as is
basis; (iii) an active program to find the buyer and other actions required to execute
the plan to sell |
F-10
FREESEAS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
the asset have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the asset is probable, and transfer of
the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year;
(v) the asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in
relation to its current fair value and (vi) actions required to complete the plan
indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that
the plan will be withdrawn. Long-lived assets or disposal groups classified as held for
sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to
sell. These assets are not depreciated once they meet the criteria to be held for sale
and are classified in current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. |
|
|
o) |
|
Impairment of Long-lived Assets: The Company follows the guidance under ASC 360,
Property, Plant and Equipment, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for
the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. The standard requires that, long-lived
assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used or disposed of by an entity be
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. When the estimate of undiscounted
cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to be generated by the use of the asset
is less than its carrying amount, the Company should evaluate the asset for an
impairment loss. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of the
asset which is determined based on management estimates and assumptions and by making
use of available market data. The Company evaluates the carrying amounts and periods
over which long-lived assets are depreciated to determine if events have occurred which
would require modification to their carrying values or useful lives. In evaluating
useful lives and carrying values of long-lived assets, management reviews certain
indicators of potential impairment, such as future undiscounted net operating cash
flows, vessel sales and purchases, business plans and overall market conditions. In
performing the recoverability tests the Company determines future undiscounted net
operating cash flows for each vessel and compares it to the vessels carrying value. The
future undiscounted net operating cash flows are determined by considering the Companys
alternative courses of action, estimated vessels utilization, its scrap value, the
charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days and an estimated
daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days over the remaining estimated useful
life of the vessel, net of vessel operating expenses adjusted for inflation, and cost of
scheduled major maintenance. When the Companys estimate of future undiscounted net
operating cash flows for any vessel is lower than the vessels carrying value, the
carrying value is written down, by recording a charge to operations, to the vessels
fair market value if the fair market value is lower than the vessels carrying value. |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Company performed an impairment assessment of its
long-lived assets by comparing the undiscounted net operating cash flows for each
vessel to its respective carrying value. The significant factors and assumptions the
Company used in each future undiscounted net operating cash flow analysis included,
among others, operating revenues, off-hire days, dry-docking costs, operating expenses
and management fee estimates. Revenue assumptions were based on contracted time charter
rates up to the end of life of the current contract of each vessel as well as Forward
Freight Agreements (FFAs) and market historical average time charter rates for the
remaining life of the vessel after the completion of the current contracts. In
addition, the Company used an annual operating expenses escalation factor and an
estimate of off hire days. All estimates used and assumptions made were in accordance
with the Companys internal budgets and historical experience of the shipping industry.
The Companys assessment concluded that for vessels that it is intended to be held and
used no impairment existed as of December 31, 2010, as the future undiscounted net
operating cash flows per vessel exceeded the carrying value of each vessel. For the
vessels for which alternative courses of action (including their sale) are under
consideration, an impairment charge of $26,631 was recognized in 2010 and reflected in
the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. |
|
|
p) |
|
Accounting for Special Survey and Dry-docking Costs: The Company follows the
deferral method of accounting for special survey and dry-docking costs, whereby actual
costs incurred are deferred and are amortized over a period of five and two and a half
years, respectively. If special survey or dry-docking is performed prior to the
scheduled date, the remaining un-amortized balances are |
F-11
FREESEAS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
immediately written-off. Indirect costs and/or costs related to ordinary maintenance,
carried out while at dry dock, are expensed when incurred as they do not provide any
future economic benefit. |
|
|
q) |
|
Financing Costs: Fees incurred for obtaining new loans are deferred and
amortized over the loans respective repayment periods, using the effective interest
rate method. These charges are included in the balance sheet line item Deferred Charges.
Any unamortized balance of costs relating to loans repaid or refinanced is expensed in
the period the repayment or refinancing is made, if the refinancing is deemed to be a
debt extinguishment under the provision of ASC 470-50 Debt: Modifications and
Extinguishments. |
|
|
r) |
|
Unearned Revenue: Unearned revenue includes cash received prior to the balance
sheet date and is related to revenue earned after such date. These amounts are
recognized as revenue over the voyage or charter period. |
|
|
s) |
|
Deferred Revenue and Back-log assets: When a vessel is acquired with an assumed
remaining time charter, the Company records any below or above market value of the time
charter assumed. The difference between market and assumed below-market charter value is
discounted using the weighted average cost of capital method and is recorded as deferred
revenue or a back log asset and amortized on a straight line basis to revenue over the
remaining life of the assumed time charter. |
|
|
t) |
|
Interest Rate Swaps: The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage net exposure
to interest rate changes related to its borrowings. Such swap agreements, designated as
economic hedges are recorded at fair value with changes in the derivatives fair value
recognized in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. During the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, there was no derivative transaction
meeting such hedge accounting criteria; therefore the change in their fair value is
recognised in earnings. |
|
|
u) |
|
Financial Instruments: The principal financial assets of the Company consist of
cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, trade receivables (net of allowance),
insurance claims, prepayments and advances. The principal financial liabilities of the
Company consist of accounts payable, accrued liabilities, deferred revenue, long-term
debt, and interest-rate swaps. The carrying amounts reflected in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets of financial assets and liabilities, approximate their
respective fair values. |
|
|
v) |
|
Fair Value Measurements: The Company follows the provisions of ASC 820, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures which defines, and provides guidance as to the
measurement of, fair value. ASC 820 creates a hierarchy of measurement and indicates
that, when possible, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The
fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority (Level 1) to quoted prices in active
markets and the lowest priority (Level 3) to unobservable data, for example, the
reporting entitys own data. Under the standard, fair value measurements are separately
disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. ASC 820 applies when assets or
liabilities in the financial statements are to be measured at fair value, but does not
require additional use of fair value beyond the requirements in other accounting
principles. . |
|
|
w) |
|
Fair value option: In February, 2007, the FASB issued ASC 825, Financial
Instruments, which permits companies to report certain financial assets and financial
liabilities at fair value. ASC 825 was effective for the Company as of January 1, 2008
at which time the Company could elect to apply the standard prospectively and measure
certain financial instruments at fair value. The Company elected not to report any
existing financial assets or liabilities at fair value that are not already reported at
fair value. The Company retains the ability to elect the fair value option for certain
future assets and liabilities acquired under this new pronouncement. |
|
|
x) |
|
Accounting for Revenue and Expenses: Revenue is recorded when services are rendered, the Company has a
signed charter agreement or other evidence of an arrangement, the price is fixed or
|
F-12
FREESEAS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
determinable, and
collection is reasonably assured. A voyage charter involves the carriage of a specific amount and type of
cargo from specific load port(s) to specific discharge port(s), subject to various cargo handling terms, in
return for payment of an agreed upon freight rate per ton of cargo. A time charter involves placing a vessel at
the charterers disposal for a period of time during which the charterer uses the vessel in return for the
payment of a specified daily hire rate. Short period charters for less than three months are referred to as spot
charters. Time charters extending three months to a year are generally referred to as medium term charters.
All other time charters are considered long term. Voyage revenues for the transportation of cargo are
recognized ratably over the estimated relative transit time of each voyage. A voyage is deemed to commence
when a vessel is available for loading of its next fixed cargo and is deemed to end upon the completion of the
discharge of the current cargo. Revenues from time chartering of vessels are accounted for as operating leases
and are thus recognized on a straight line basis as the average revenue over the rental periods of such charter
agreements, as service is provided, Voyage expenses, primarily consisting of port, canal and bunker
expenses that are unique to a particular charter, are paid for by the charterer under time charter arrangements
or by the Company under voyage charter arrangements, except for commissions, which are always paid for
by the Company, regardless of charter type. All voyage and vessel operating expenses are expensed as
incurred, except for commissions. Commissions are deferred over the related voyage charter period to the
extent revenue has been deferred since commissions are earned as the Companys revenues are earned.
Probable losses on voyages in progress are provided for in full at the time such losses can be estimated. |
|
|
y) |
|
Profit Sharing Arrangements: From time to time, the Company has entered into
profit sharing arrangements with its charterers, whereby the Company may have received
additional income at an agreed percentage of net earnings earned by such charterer,
where those earnings are over the base rate of hire and settled periodically during the
term of the charter agreement. Revenues generated from the profit sharing arrangements
are recorded in the period they are earned. |
|
|
z) |
|
Repairs and Maintenance: All repair and maintenance expenses, including major
overhauling and underwater inspection expenses, are charged against income as incurred
and are included in vessel operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. |
|
|
aa) |
|
Stock-Based Compensation: Following the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-
Stock Compensation the Company recognizes all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, in the consolidated statements of operations
based on their fair values on the grant date. Compensation cost on stock based awards
with graded vesting is recognized on an accelerated basis as though each separately
vesting portion of the award was in substance, a separate award. |
|
|
bb) |
|
Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income
(loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods
presented. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that would occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised. Dilution has been
computed by the treasury stock method whereby all of the Companys dilutive securities
(warrants, options and restricted shares) are assumed to be exercised and the proceeds
used to repurchase common shares at the weighted average market price of the Companys
common stock during the relevant periods. The incremental shares (the difference between
the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) are
included in the denominator of the diluted earnings per share computation unless such
inclusion would be anti-dilutive. |
|
|
cc) |
|
Segment Reporting: The Company reports financial information and evaluates its
operations by total charter revenues. The Company does not have discrete financial
information to evaluate the operating results for each type of charter. Although revenue
can be identified for these types of charters, management does not identify expenses,
profitability or other financial information for these charters. As a result,
management, including the chief operating decision makers, reviews operating results
solely by revenue per day and operating results of the fleet and thus the Company has
determined that it operates under one reportable segment. Furthermore, when the Company
charters a vessel to a charterer, the charterer is free to trade the vessel worldwide
and, as a result, the disclosure of geographic information is impracticable. |
F-13
FREESEAS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
dd) |
|
Subsequent Events: The Company evaluates subsequent events or transactions up to
the date in which the financial statements are issued according to the requirements of
ASC 855. |
|
|
ee) |
|
Recent Accounting Standards Updates: |
|
|
|
|
ASU 2010-06: In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820)-Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements. ASU
2010-06 amends ASC 820 to add new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and
out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value
disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques
used to measure fair value. The ASU also amends guidance on employers disclosures
about postretirement benefit plan assets under ASC 715 to require that disclosures be
provided by classes of assets instead of by major categories of assets. The guidance in
the ASU is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods)
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide the Level 3
activity of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis, which will
be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. In the period of initial adoption, entities will not
be required to provide the amended disclosures for any previous periods presented for
comparative purposes. However, those disclosures are required for periods ending after
initial adoption. The provisions of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, the Companys current liabilities exceeded its current assets by
$2,128. In addition and as further discussed in Note 6 the Companys expected short term
capital commitments to fund the construction installments under the shipbuilding contracts in
2011, amount to $4,880. Cash expected to be generated from operations assuming that current
market charter hire rates would prevail in 2011, may not be sufficient to cover the Companys
ongoing working capital requirements and capital commitments, or for the Company to be in
compliance with certain covenants contained in its loan agreements. The Company is currently
exploring several alternatives aiming to manage its working capital requirements and other
commitments in the event of current market charter hire rates will continue including a share
capital increase, disposition of certain vessels in its current fleet as more fully described
in Note 5, and seek to achieve additional reductions in operating and other costs. |
|
|
|
|
The Company believes that the above plans will be sufficient to cover its working capital
needs for a reasonable period of time. |
4. |
|
Related Party Transactions |
|
|
|
Manager |
|
|
|
|
All vessels listed in Note 1 (except M/V Free Fighter and M/V Free Destiny which were sold in
April 2007 and August 2010, respectively) receive management services from the Manager,
pursuant to ship management agreements between each of the ship-owning companies and the
Manager. |
|
|
|
|
On October 1, 2010, the subsidiaries Adventure Fourteen S.A. and Adventure Fifteen S.A.
entered into management agreements with the Manager for the provision of management services
to Hull 1 and Hull 2. |
|
|
|
|
Each of the Companys ship-owning subsidiaries pays, as per its management agreement with the
Manager, monthly technical management fee of $16.5 (on the basis that the $/Euro exchange
rate is 1.30 or lower; if on the first business day of each month the $/Euro exchange rate
exceeds 1.30 then the management fee payable will be increased for the month in question, so
that the amount payable in $ will be the equivalent in Euro based on 1.30 $/Euro exchange
rate) plus a fee of $0.4 per day for superintendant attendance and other direct expenses. |
F-14
FREESEAS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
FreeSeas also pays the Manager a fee equal to 1.25% of the gross freight or hire from the
employment of FreeSeas vessels. The Manager has subcontracted the charter and post charter
management of FreeSeas vessels and pays the 1.25% of the gross freight or hire from the
employment of the vessels to Safbulk Pty Ltd (Safbulk), an entity affiliated with one
Companys major shareholder. In addition, FreeSeas pays a 1% commission on the gross purchase
price of any new vessel acquired or the gross sale price of any vessel sold by FreeSeas with
the assistance of the Manager. In this respect, the Company paid Free Bulkers $32 relating to
the sale of M/V Free Destiny (Note 5) and $488 relating to the signing of shipbuilding
contracts for the construction of two handysize vessels (Note 6) in 2010 and $110 relating to
the acquisition of M/V Free Neptune in 2009. In addition, the Company has incurred
commission expense relating to its commercial agreement with the Manager amounting to $728,
$752 and $866 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively, included in
Commissions in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. |
|
|
|
|
FreeSeas pays, as per its services agreement with the Manager, a monthly fee of $118.5, (on
the basis that the $/Euro exchange rate is 1.35 or lower; if on the last business day of each
month the $/Euro exchange rate exceeds 1.35 then the service fee payable will be adjusted
for the following month in question, so that the amount payable in dollars will be the
equivalent in Euro based on 1.35 $/Euro exchange rate) as compensation for services related
to accounting, financial reporting, implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley internal control over
financial reporting procedures and general administrative and management services plus
expenses. The Manager is entitled to a termination fee if the agreement is terminated upon a
change of control as defined in its services agreement with the Manager. The termination
fee as of December 31, 2010 would be $100,298. |
|
|
|
|
Fees and expenses charged by the Manager are included in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements in Management fees to a related party, General and administrative
expenses, Operating expenses, Gain on sale of vessel, Vessels, Vessel impairment
loss and Advances for vessels under construction. The total amounts charged for the year
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $3,826 ($1,978 of management fees, $1,439
of services fees, $178 of superintendent fees, $117 for other expenses and $114 for
management fees and supervision expenses for vessels under construction), $3,245 ($1,874 of
management fees, $1,313 of services fees and $58 of superintendent fees) and $2,634 ($1,655
of management fees, $679 of services fees and $300 of partial contribution for the
refurbishment of the office space used by the Company), respectively. |
|
|
|
|
On December 31, 2009, the Company granted 84,000 restricted shares to certain of the
Managers employees vesting in December 2012 pursuant to the Companys equity incentive plan
(Note 14). |
|
|
|
|
The cost of these shares is amortized over their vesting period and is included in General
and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. In
addition, in December 2010 and 2009, a bonus of $400 and $200 respectively, was granted to
the Manager, which is included in General and administrative expenses. |
|
|
|
|
The balance due from the Manager as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $1,285 and
$1,410 respectively. The amount paid to the Manager for office space during the year ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $204, $197 and $206, respectively and is included in
General and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. |
|
|
|
|
First Business Bank (FBB) |
|
|
|
|
FreeSeas received from FBB, in which one of the Companys major shareholders holds a
substantial interest, and in which the Companys Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President owns a minority interest, a loan of $26,250 (Note 10) which has been used to
partly finance the acquisition of the M/V Free Impala in April 2008. On December 15, 2009,
the Company reached an agreement for a new secured term loan of $27,750 from FBB to refinance
its then outstanding loan balance of $21,750 and to receive additional liquidity of up to
$6,000 with a first priority mortgage over the M/V Free Impala and the M/V Free Neptune. The
outstanding balance of the loan as of December 31, 2010 was $25,750. Interest charged under
the loan |
F-15
FREESEAS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
facility for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 amounts to $893, $629 and $874,
respectively, and is included in the Interest and finance cost in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Other Related Parties |
|
|
|
|
The Company, through Free Bulkers and Safbulk uses from time to time a ship-brokering firm
associated with family members of the Companys Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President for certain of the charters of the Companys fleet. During the year ended December
31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 such ship-brokering firm charged the Company commissions of $175, $48
and $112, respectively, which are included in Commissions in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. The balance due to the ship-brokering firm as of December 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 was $98 and $18 respectively. |
5. |
|
Vessels, net/Vessels held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
Vessels Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
117,781 |
|
|
$ |
(9,760 |
) |
|
$ |
108,021 |
|
Additions new vessels |
|
|
180,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,733 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,349 |
|
|
|
(13,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
298,514 |
|
|
$ |
(23,109 |
) |
|
$ |
275,405 |
|
Additions new vessels |
|
|
11,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,302 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,006 |
|
|
|
(16,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
309,816 |
|
|
$ |
(39,115 |
) |
|
$ |
270,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,365 |
) |
|
|
(15,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal |
|
|
(7,600 |
) |
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
Vessel held for sale |
|
|
(27,981 |
) |
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
|
(22,509 |
) |
Vessel impairment charge |
|
|
(22,921 |
) |
|
|
5,824 |
|
|
|
(17,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
251,314 |
|
|
$ |
(37,623 |
) |
|
$ |
213,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel acquisition during the year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
In 2009, the Company agreed to purchase the M/V Free Neptune from an unaffiliated third party
for $11,000 plus costs directly related to the purchase amounting to $302. The vessel is a
30,838 dwt Handysize vessel built in 1996 in Japan, and was delivered to the Company on
August 25, 2009. The Company financed the acquisition using cash on hand which was raised as
part of the Companys follow on equity offering in July 2009 (Note 15). |
|
|
|
|
Vessel acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
During 2008, the Company acquired the M/V Free Knight, M/V Free Impala, M/V Free Lady and M/V
Free Maverick for a total purchase cost of $180,733. |
|
|
|
|
Vessel disposed during the year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
On July 30, 2010, the Company agreed to sell the M/V Free Destiny, a 1982 built 25,240 dwt
Handysize dry bulk vessel for a consideration of $3,213. The vessel was delivered to the
buyers on August 27, 2010 and the Company recognized a gain of $807 as a result of the sale.
From the proceeds of the sale, the Company paid on November 1, 2010 an amount of $2,700
constituting prepayment towards the Deutsche Bank Nederland N.V. (Deutsche Bank Nederland,
formerly known as Hollandsche Bank Unie) loan facility B (Note 10). |
F-16
FREESEAS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in thousands of United States Dollars, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
Vessel classified as assets held for sale during the year ended December 31, 2010, or for
which management has committed to a plan of sale |
|
|
|
|
The Company according to the provisions of ASC 360, has classified the M/V Free Hero as held
for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2010
at her estimated market value less costs to sell, as all criteria required for the
classification as Held for Sale were met at the balance sheet date. The vessels carrying
value was adjusted to $13,606 at the date of its classification as held for sale. Furthermore
subsequent to December 31, 2010, at the direction of the Companys Board of Directors, and
after obtaining the respective lenders consent (FBB), the Company initiated a plan of sale of
the vessels M/V Free Neptune and M/V Free Impala within the context of its plans to fund its
working capital requirements as discussed in Note 3 and renew its fleet of vessels. All three
vessels are expected to be disposed off subsequent to March 31, 2011 but prior to December
31, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
The Company has individually assessed for recoverability the carrying values of each of the
above vessels, including unamortized deferred dry docking costs of $631. In performing its
assessment, the Company compared the carrying values of these vessels with their estimated
fair values at December 31, 2010. As a result of this assessment the Company has recognized
an impairment loss of $26,631 in the accompanying 2010 consolidated statement of operations,
of which $17,253 relates to the M/V Free Impala and $9,378 to the M/V Free Hero. No
impairment loss was recognized for the M/V Free Neptune as its fair value exceeded its
carrying value. The Company estimates that the aggregate net proceeds from the sale of these
vessels, excluding approximately $34,000 of the proceeds that will be applied against Credit
Suisse and FBB loan outstanding balances, will be sufficient to cover its working capital
requirements in case that current market charter rates will continue for an extended period
of time. |
|
|
|
|
All of the Companys vessels have been provided as collateral to secure the bank loans
discussed in Note 10 below. |
6. |
|
Advances for Vessels under Construction |
|
|
|
On August 17, 2010, two of the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries entered into shipbuilding
contracts with a Chinese yard for the construction of two drybulk vessels of approximately
33,600 dwt each for an aggregate purchase price of $49,720 including extra costs of
approximately $920 in total. The vessels are scheduled for delivery in the second and third
quarter of 2012. The Company has advanced the first installment on September 20, 2010
amounting to $2,440 for each hull. |
|
|
|
|
The amount shown in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet includes milestone payments
relating to the shipbuilding contracts with the shipyard, supervision costs and any material
related expenses incurred during the construction period, all of which are capitalized in
accordance with the accounting policy discussed in Note 2. |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Company has advanced $4,880 under the shipbuilding contracts as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Expected |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
Vessel name |
|
delivery |
|
|
payments |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
Total |
|
Hull 1 |
|
May-12 |
|
$ |
2,440 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
2,853 |
|
Hull 2 |
|
July-12 |
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,880 |
|
|
$ |
785 |
|
|
$ |
5,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
< |