UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

 

Commission file number 1-13805

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(312) 461-2121

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

The number of shares of Common Stock, $1.00 par value, outstanding on March 31, 2011 was 1,180. No common equity is held by nonaffiliates.

 

 

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Forward-Looking Information

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Report”) of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation (the “Company”) includes certain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including (without limitation) statements with respect to the Company’s expectations, intentions, beliefs or strategies regarding the future. Forward-looking statements include the Company’s statements regarding tax treatment as a real estate investment trust, liquidity, provision for loan losses, capital resources and investment activities. In addition, in those and other portions of this document, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend” and other similar expressions, as they relate to the Company or the Company’s management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. It is important to note that the Company’s actual results could differ materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. Among the factors that could cause the results to differ materially are the risks discussed in “Risk Factors” below (Item 1A of this Report). The Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

 

 

General

 

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation is a Maryland corporation incorporated on September 24, 1997 pursuant to the Maryland General Corporation Law. The Company’s principal business objective is to acquire, hold, finance and manage qualifying real estate investment trust (“REIT”) assets (the “Mortgage Assets”), consisting of mortgage-backed securities, notes issued by Harris N.A. (the “Bank”) secured by Securing Mortgage Loans (defined below) and other obligations secured by real property, as well as certain other qualifying REIT assets. The Company’s assets are held in a Maryland real estate investment trust subsidiary, Harris Preferred Capital Trust. The Company has elected to be treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), and will generally not be subject to federal income tax if it distributes 90% of its adjusted REIT ordinary taxable income and meets all of the qualifications necessary to be a REIT. All of the shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Common Stock”), are owned by Harris Capital Holdings, Inc. (“HCH”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank. The Company was formed by the Bank to provide investors with the opportunity to invest in residential mortgages and other real estate assets and to provide the Bank with a cost-effective means of raising capital for federal regulatory purposes. Beginning January 1, 2009, Illinois requires a “captive” REIT to increase its state taxable income by the amount of dividends paid. Under this law, a captive REIT includes a REIT of which 50% of the voting power or value of the beneficial interest or shares is owned by a single person. Management believes that the Company is classified as a “captive” REIT under Illinois law, in light of the fact that (1) all of the Common Stock are held by HCH, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, (2) the Common Stock represent more than 50% of the voting power of the Company’s equity securities and (3) the Common Stock is not listed for trading on an exchange. The 2010 Illinois statutory tax rate was 7.3% and the 2011 tax rate will be 9.5%. Management believes that the state tax expense to be incurred by the Company in future years should not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s ability to declare and pay future dividends on the Preferred Shares (as defined below). This belief is based upon the ownership interest of the Company, whereby any tax expense incurred is expected to primarily reduce the net earnings available to the holder of our Common Stock.

 

On February 11, 1998, the Company, through a public offering (the “Offering”), issued 10,000,000 shares of its 73/8% Noncumulative Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Preferred Shares”), $1.00 par value. The Offering raised $250 million less $7.9 million of underwriting fees. The Preferred Shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “HBC Pr A”. Holders of Preferred Shares are entitled to receive, if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, noncumulative dividends at a rate of 73/8% per annum of the $25 per share liquidation preference (an amount equivalent to $1.8438 per share per annum). Dividends on the Preferred Shares, if authorized and declared, are payable quarterly in arrears on March 30, June 30, September 30 and December 30 of each year, provided that, if any interest payment date on the Preferred Shares (“Interest Payment Date”) would otherwise fall on a day that is not a Business Day the Interest Payment Date will be on the following Business Day.

The Preferred Shares may be redeemed for cash at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, at the liquidation preference thereof, plus the quarterly accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, thereon. The Company may not redeem the Preferred Shares without prior approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) or the appropriate successor or other federal regulatory agency.

 

Each Preferred Share will be automatically exchanged (the “Automatic Exchange”) for one newly issued preferred share of the Bank (“Bank Preferred Share”) in the event (i) the Bank becomes less than “adequately capitalized” under regulations established pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, as amended, (ii) the Bank is placed into conservatorship or receivership, (iii) the OCC directs such exchange in writing because, in its sole discretion and even if the Bank is not less than “adequately capitalized,” the OCC anticipates that the Bank may become less than adequately capitalized in the near term, or (iv) the OCC in its sole discretion directs in writing an exchange in the event that the Bank has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 5% (each an “Exchange Event”). As a result of an Exchange Event, the Bank Preferred Shares would constitute a new series of preferred shares of the Bank, would have the same dividend rights, liquidation preference, redemption options and other attributes as the Preferred Shares, except that the Bank Preferred Shares would not be listed on the New York Stock Exchange and would rank pari passu in terms of cash dividend payments and liquidation preference with any outstanding shares of preferred stock of the Bank.

 

Concurrent with the issuance of the Preferred Shares, the Bank contributed additional capital of $241 million, net of acquisition costs, to the Company. The Company and the Bank undertook the Offering for two principal reasons: (i) the qualification of the Preferred Shares as Tier 1 capital of the Bank for U.S. banking regulatory purposes under relevant regulatory capital guidelines, as a result of the treatment of the Preferred Shares as a minority interest in a consolidated subsidiary of the Bank, and (ii) lack of federal income tax on the Company’s earnings used to pay the dividends on the Preferred Shares, as a result of the Company’s qualification as a REIT. On December 30, 1998, the Bank contributed the Common Stock of the Company to HCH, a newly-formed and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank. The Bank is an indirect wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary of Bank of Montreal (“BMO”). The Bank is required to maintain direct or indirect ownership of at least 80% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company for as long as any Preferred Shares are outstanding.

 

The Company used the Offering proceeds and the additional capital contributed by the Bank to purchase $356 million of notes (the “Notes”) from the Bank and $135 million of mortgage-backed securities at their estimated fair value. The Notes are obligations issued by the Bank that are recourse only to the underlying mortgage loans (the “Securing Mortgage Loans”) and were acquired pursuant to the terms of a loan agreement with the Bank. The principal amount of the Notes equals approximately 80% of the principal amounts of the Securing Mortgage Loans.

 

On March 4, 2009, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 1,000 shares to 5,000 shares. On March 5, 2009, the Company entered into a contribution agreement with HCH pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell 180 shares of Common Stock to HCH for a purchase price of $444,444.44 per share, or $80,000,000 in cash. HCH acquired the shares on March 5, 2009 and continues to own 100% of the shares of the Common Stock. The Company utilized proceeds from the Common Stock issuance to acquire assets in a manner consistent with Company investment guidelines.

 

Business

 

The Company was formed for the purpose of raising capital for the Bank. One of the Company’s principal business objectives is to acquire, hold, finance and manage Mortgage Assets. These Mortgage Assets generate interest income for distribution to stockholders. A portion of the Mortgage Assets of the Company consists of Notes issued by the Bank that are recourse only to Securing Mortgage Loans that are secured by real property. The Notes mature on October 1, 2027 and pay interest at 6.4% per annum. Payments of interest are made to the Company from payments made on the Securing Mortgage Loans. Pursuant to an agreement between the Company and the Bank, the Company, through the Bank as agent, receives all scheduled payments made on the Securing Mortgage Loans, retains a portion of any such payments equal to the amount due on the Notes and remits the balance, if any, to the Bank. The Company also retains approximately 80% of any prepayments of principal in respect of the Securing Mortgage Loans and applies such amounts as a prepayment on the Notes. The Company has a security interest in the

real property securing the Securing Mortgage Loans and will be entitled to enforce payment on the loans in its own name if a mortgagor should default. In the event of such default, the Company would have the same rights as the original mortgagee to foreclose the mortgaged property and satisfy the obligations of the Bank out of the proceeds.

 

The Company may from time to time acquire fixed-rate or variable-rate mortgage-backed securities representing interests in pools of mortgage loans. The Bank may have originated a portion of any such mortgage-backed securities by exchanging pools of mortgage loans for the mortgage-backed securities. The mortgage loans underlying the mortgage-backed securities will be secured by single-family residential properties located throughout the United States. The Company intends to acquire only investment grade mortgage-backed securities issued by agencies of the federal government or government sponsored agencies, such as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”). The Company does not intend to acquire any interest-only, principal-only or similar speculative mortgage-backed securities. All mortgage back securities at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were all government secured securities.

 

The Bank may from time to time acquire or originate both conforming and nonconforming residential mortgage loans. Conventional conforming residential mortgage loans comply with the requirements for inclusion in a loan guarantee program sponsored by either FHLMC or Fannie Mae. Nonconforming residential mortgage loans are residential mortgage loans that do not qualify in one or more respects for purchase by Fannie Mae or FHLMC under their standard programs. The nonconforming residential mortgage loans that the Company purchases will be nonconforming because they have original principal balances which exceed the limits for FHLMC or Fannie Mae under their standard programs. The Company believes that all residential mortgage loans will meet the requirements for sale to national private mortgage conduit programs or other investors in the secondary mortgage market. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years then ended, the Company did not directly hold any residential mortgage loans.

 

The Company may from time to time acquire commercial mortgage loans secured by industrial and warehouse properties, recreational facilities, office buildings, retail space and shopping malls, hotels and motels, hospitals, nursing homes or senior living centers. The Company’s current policy is not to acquire any interest in a commercial mortgage loan if commercial mortgage loans would constitute more than 5% of the Company’s Mortgage Assets at the time of its acquisition. Unlike residential mortgage loans, commercial mortgage loans generally lack standardized terms. Commercial real estate properties themselves tend to be unique and are more difficult to value than residential real estate properties. Commercial mortgage loans may also not be fully amortizing, meaning that they may have a significant principal balance or “balloon” payment due on maturity. Moreover, commercial properties, particularly industrial and warehouse properties, are generally subject to relatively greater environmental risks than non-commercial properties, generally giving rise to increased costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations. There is no requirement regarding the percentage of any commercial real estate property that must be leased at the time the Bank acquires a commercial mortgage loan secured by such commercial real estate property, and there is no requirement that commercial mortgage loans have third party guarantees. The credit quality of a commercial mortgage loan may depend on, among other factors, the existence and structure of underlying leases, the physical condition of the property (including whether any maintenance has been deferred), the creditworthiness of tenants, the historical and anticipated level of vacancies and rents on the property and on other comparable properties located in the same region, potential or existing environmental risks, the availability of credit to refinance the commercial mortgage loan at or prior to maturity and the local and regional economic climate in general. Foreclosures of defaulted commercial mortgage loans are generally subject to a number of complicated factors, including environmental considerations, which are generally not present in foreclosures of residential mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years then ended, the Company did not hold any commercial mortgage loans.

 

The Company may invest in assets eligible to be held by REITs other than those described above. In addition to commercial mortgage loans and mortgage loans secured by multi-family properties, such assets could include cash, cash equivalents and securities, including shares or interests in other REITs and partnership interests. At December 31, 2010, the Company held $24 million of short-term money market assets and $40 million of U.S. Treasury securities. At December 31, 2009, the Company held $22 million of short-term money market assets and $40 million of U.S. Treasury Securities.

The Company intends to continue to acquire Mortgage Assets from the Bank and/or affiliates of the Bank on terms that are comparable to those that could be obtained by the Company if such Mortgage Assets were purchased from unrelated third parties. The Company may also from time to time acquire Mortgage Assets from unrelated third parties.

 

The Company intends to maintain a substantial portion of its portfolio in Bank-secured obligations and mortgage-backed securities. The Company may, however, invest in other assets eligible to be held by a REIT. The Company’s current policy and the Servicing Agreement (defined below) prohibit the acquisition of any Mortgage Asset constituting an interest in a mortgage loan (other than an interest resulting from the acquisition of mortgage-backed securities), which mortgage loan (i) is delinquent (more than 30 days past due) in the payment of principal or interest at the time of proposed acquisition; (ii) is or was at any time during the preceding 12 months (a) on nonaccrual status or (b) renegotiated due to financial deterioration of the borrower; or (iii) has been, more than once during the preceding 12 months, more than 30 days past due in payment of principal or interest. Loans that are on “nonaccrual status” are generally loans that are past due 90 days or more in principal or interest. The Company maintains a policy of disposing of any mortgage loan which (i) falls into nonaccrual status, (ii) has to be renegotiated due to the financial deterioration of the borrower, or (iii) is more than 30 days past due in the payment of principal or interest more than once in any 12 month period. The Company may choose, at any time subsequent to its acquisition of any Mortgage Assets, to require the Bank (as part of the Servicing Agreement) to dispose of the mortgage loans for any of these reasons or for any other reason.

 

The Bank services the Securing Mortgage Loans and the other mortgage loans purchased by the Company on behalf of, and as agent for, the Company and is entitled to receive fees in connection with the servicing thereof pursuant to a servicing agreement (the “Servicing Agreement”). The Bank receives a fee equal to 0.25% per annum on the principal balances of the loans serviced. Payment of such fees is subordinate to payments of dividends on the Preferred Shares. The Servicing Agreement requires the Bank to service the loans in a manner generally consistent with accepted secondary market practices, with any servicing guidelines promulgated by the Company and, in the case of residential mortgage loans, with Fannie Mae and FHLMC guidelines and procedures. The Servicing Agreement requires the Bank to service the loans solely with a view toward the interest of the Company and without regard to the interest of the Bank or any of its affiliates. The Bank will collect and remit principal and interest payments, administer mortgage escrow accounts, submit and pursue insurance claims and initiate and supervise foreclosure proceedings on the loans it services. The Bank may, with the approval of a majority of the Company’s Board of Directors, as well as a majority of the Company’s Independent Directors (as defined in Item 13 (c) below), subcontract all or a portion of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement to unrelated third parties. The Bank will not, in connection with the subcontracting of any of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement, be discharged or relieved in any respect from its obligations under the Servicing Agreement. The Company may terminate the Servicing Agreement upon the occurrence of such events as they relate to the Bank’s proper and timely performance of its duties and obligations under the Servicing Agreement. As long as any Preferred Shares remain outstanding, the Company may not terminate, or elect to renew, the Servicing Agreement without the approval of a majority of the Company’s Independent Directors (as defined in Item 13 (c) below).

 

The Bank administers the day-to-day operations of the Company, pursuant to an advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”). The Bank is responsible for (i) monitoring the credit quality of Mortgage Assets held by the Company, (ii) advising the Company with respect to the reinvestment of income from and payments on, and with respect to the acquisition, management, financing and disposition of the Mortgage Assets held by the Company, and (iii) monitoring the Company’s compliance with the requirements necessary to qualify as a REIT, and other financial and tax-related matters. The Bank may from time to time subcontract all or a portion of its obligations under the Advisory Agreement to one or more of its affiliates. The Bank may, with the approval of a majority of the Company’s Board of Directors, as well as a majority of the Company’s Independent Directors, subcontract all or a portion of its obligations under the Advisory Agreement to unrelated third parties. The Bank will not, in connection with the subcontracting of any of its obligations under the Advisory Agreement, be discharged or relieved in any respect from its obligations under the Advisory Agreement. The Advisory Agreement is renewed annually. The Company may terminate the Advisory Agreement at any time upon 60 days’ prior written notice. As long as any Preferred Shares remain outstanding, any decision by the Company either to renew the Advisory Agreement or to

terminate the Advisory Agreement must be approved by a majority of the Board of Directors, as well as by a majority of the Company’s Independent Directors (as defined in Item 13 (c) below).

 

The Advisory Agreements in effect in 2010 and 2009 entitled the Bank to receive advisory fees of $167 thousand and $196 thousand, respectively. It is expected that 2011 advisory fees will be approximately $170 thousand.

 

The Company may from time to time purchase additional Mortgage Assets out of proceeds received in connection with the repayment or disposition of Mortgage Assets, the issuance of additional shares of preferred stock or additional capital contributions with respect to the Common Stock. The Company may also issue additional series of preferred stock. However, pursuant to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Charter”), the Company may not issue additional shares of preferred stock senior to the Series A preferred shares either in the payment of dividends or in the distribution of assets on liquidation without the consent of holders of at least 67% of the outstanding shares of preferred stock at that time or without approval of a majority of the Company’s Independent Directors. The Company does not currently intend to issue any additional shares of preferred stock unless it simultaneously receives additional capital contributions from HCH or other affiliates sufficient to support the issuance of such additional shares of preferred stock.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had no paid employees. All officers of the Company were employed by the Bank.

 

Environmental Matters

 

In the event that the Company is forced to foreclose on a defaulted Securing Mortgage Loan to recover its investment in such loan, the Company may be subject to environmental liabilities in connection with the underlying real property, which could exceed the value of the real property. Although the Company intends to exercise due diligence to discover potential environmental liabilities prior to the acquisition of any property through foreclosure, hazardous substances or wastes, contaminants, pollutants or sources thereof (as defined by state and federal laws and regulations) may be discovered on properties during the Company’s ownership or after a sale thereof to a third party. If such hazardous substances are discovered on a property which the Company has acquired through foreclosure or otherwise, the Company may be required to remove those substances and clean up the property. There can be no assurance that in such a case the Company would not incur full recourse liability for the entire costs of any removal and clean-up, that the cost of such removal and clean-up would not exceed the value of the property or that the Company could recoup any of such costs from any third party. The Company may also be liable to tenants and other users of neighboring properties. In addition, the Company may find it difficult or impossible to sell the property prior to or following any such clean-up. The Company has not foreclosed on any Securing Mortgage Loans during 2010 and 2009.

 

Qualification as a REIT

 

The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1998 and intends to comply with the provisions of the Code with respect thereto. The Company will not be subject to Federal income tax to the extent it distributes 90% of its adjusted REIT ordinary taxable income to stockholders and as long as certain assets, income and stock ownership tests are met. For 2010 as well as 2009, the Company met all Code requirements for a REIT, including the asset, income, stock ownership and distribution tests. Beginning January 1, 2009, the state of Illinois requires a “captive” REIT to increase its state taxable income by the amount of dividends paid. Under this law, a captive REIT includes a REIT of which 50% of the voting power or value of the beneficial interest or shares is owned by a single corporation. Management believes that the Company would be classified as a “captive” REIT under Illinois law, in light of the fact that (1) all of the outstanding Common Stock is held by HCH, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, (2) the Company’s Common Stock represents more than 50% of the voting power of the Company’s equity securities and (3) the Common Stock is not listed for trading on an exchange. Management believes that the state tax expense to be incurred by the Company in future years should not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s ability to declare and pay future dividends on the preferred shares. This

belief is based upon the ownership interest of the Company, whereby any tax expense incurred is expected to primarily reduce the net earnings available to the holder of our Common Stock. The Illinois statutory tax rate for 2010 was 7.3% and for 2011 will be 9.5%.

 

The following tables sets forth selected dividend information:

 

 

No common dividends were paid in the year ended December 31, 2010

 

 

 

Set forth below and elsewhere in this Report and in other documents filed with the SEC (including the February 5, 1998 Prospectus (the “1998 Prospectus”) for the Offering (SEC File No. 333-40257)), are risks and uncertainties with respect to the Company, the Preferred Shares and the Bank. This Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include those discussed below.

 

Declining interest rates will reduce earnings of the Company

 

The Company’s income will consist primarily of interest payments on the earning assets held by it. If there is a decline in interest rates during a period of time when the Company must reinvest payments of interest and principal in respect of its earning assets, the Company may find it difficult to purchase additional earning assets that generate sufficient income to support payment of dividends on the Preferred Shares.

 

Because the rate at which dividends, if, when and as authorized and declared, are payable on the Preferred Shares is fixed, there can be no assurance that an interest rate environment in which there is a decline in interest rates would not adversely affect the Company’s ability to pay dividends on the Preferred Shares.

 

Dividends may not be authorized quarterly by our Board of Directors and dividends not authorized will not be paid

 

Dividends on the Preferred Shares are not cumulative. Consequently, if the Board of Directors does not authorize a dividend on the Preferred Shares for any quarterly period, the holders of the Preferred Shares would not

be entitled to recover such dividend whether or not funds are or subsequently become available. Quarterly dividends may not always be paid on the Preferred Shares. The Board of Directors may determine, in its business judgment, that it would be in the best interests of the Company to pay less than the full amount of the stated dividend on the Preferred Shares or no dividend for any quarter, notwithstanding that funds are available. Factors that may be considered by the Board of Directors in making this determination are the Company’s financial condition and capital needs, the impact of legislation and regulations as then in effect or as may be proposed, economic conditions, and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. To remain qualified as a REIT, the Company must distribute annually at least 90% of its “REIT taxable income” (not including capital gains) to stockholders. See “Tax Risks.”

 

Dividends and operations of the Company restricted by regulation

 

Because the Company is a subsidiary of the Bank, bank regulatory authorities will have the right to examine the Company and its activities. Under certain circumstances, including any determination that the Bank’s relationship to the Company results in an unsafe and unsound banking practice, such regulatory authorities will have the authority to restrict the ability of the Company to transfer assets, to make distributions to its stockholders (including dividends to the holders of Preferred Shares, as described below), or to redeem Preferred Shares, or even to require the Bank to sever its relationship with, or divest its ownership of, the Company. Such actions could potentially result in the Company’s failure to qualify as a REIT.

 

Payment of dividends on the Preferred Shares could also be subject to regulatory limitations if the Bank became less than “adequately capitalized” for purposes of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”). Less than “adequately capitalized” is currently defined as having (i) a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, or (iii) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of less than 4.0% (or 3.0% under certain circumstances not currently applicable to the Bank). At December 31, 2010, the Bank’s Total risk-based capital ratio was 17.87%, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 15.98% and the Tier 1 leverage ratio was 9.64%. Consequently, the Bank was categorized as “well-capitalized” by its regulator at December 31, 2010.

 

In addition, the National Bank Act requires all national banks, including the Bank, to obtain prior approval from the OCC if dividends declared by the national bank (including subsidiaries of the national bank (except for dividends paid by such subsidiary to the national bank)) in any calendar year, will exceed its net income for that year, combined with its retained income (as defined in the applicable regulations) for the preceding two years. These provisions apply to a national bank and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, notwithstanding the earnings of any subsidiary on a stand-alone basis. Beginning in 2009, the Bank no longer had sufficient capacity to declare and pay dividends without prior regulatory approval of the OCC. As a result, the Company, as an indirect subsidiary of the Bank, became subject to the provisions relating to dividend approval, and the Bank must receive prior approval from the OCC before the Company declares dividends on the Preferred Shares. Prior approval from the OCC was received for the dividend declaration in September and December of 2010 and the most recent dividend declaration in March 2011. The Company anticipates the need to request similar approvals from the OCC for all quarters in 2011. At this time, the Company has no reason to expect that such approvals will not be received. There is no assurance that the Bank and the Company will not be subject to the requirement to receive prior regulatory approvals for Preferred Shares dividend payments in the future or that, if required, such approvals will be obtained.

 

Automatic exchange for Bank Preferred Shares could occur when value of Bank Preferred Shares is impaired

 

An investment in the Preferred Shares involves risk with respect to the performance and capital levels of the Bank. A decline in the performance and capital levels of the Bank or the placement of the Bank into conservatorship or receivership could result in the automatic exchange of the Preferred Shares for Bank Preferred Shares, which would be an investment in the Bank and not in the Company. As a result, holders of Preferred Shares would become preferred stockholders of the Bank at a time when the Bank’s financial condition was deteriorating or when the Bank had been placed into conservatorship or receivership. If an Exchange Event occurs, the Bank would likely be unable to pay dividends on the Bank Preferred Shares.

An investment in the Bank is also subject to certain risks that are distinct from the risks associated with an investment in the Company. For example, an investment in the Bank would involve risks relating to the capital levels of, and other federal regulatory requirements applicable to, the Bank, and the performance of the Bank’s loan portfolio. An investment in the Bank is also subject to the general risks inherent in equity investments in depository institutions. In the event of a liquidation of the Bank, the claims of depositors and secured, senior, general and subordinated creditors of the Bank would be entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of holders of equity interests such as the Bank Preferred Shares. As a result, if the Bank were to be placed into receivership, the holders of the Bank Preferred Shares likely would receive, if anything, substantially less than they would have received had the Preferred Shares not been exchanged for Bank Preferred Shares.

 

Bank Preferred Shares will not be listed on any exchange and markets may not be liquid

 

Although the Preferred Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the Bank does not intend to apply for listing of the Bank Preferred Shares on any national securities exchange. Consequently, there can be no assurance as to the liquidity of the trading markets for the Bank Preferred Shares, if issued, or that an active public market for the Bank Preferred Shares would develop or be maintained.

 

Adverse consequences of failure to qualify as a REIT

 

The Company intends to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances, not entirely within the Company’s control, may affect the Company’s ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. Although the Company is not aware of any proposal in Congress to amend the tax laws in a manner that would materially and adversely affect the Company’s ability to operate as a REIT, no assurance can be given that new legislation or new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not significantly change the tax laws in the future with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

 

If, in any taxable year the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, the Company would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing its taxable income and would be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. As a result, the amount available for distribution to the Company’s stockholders including the holders of the Preferred Shares, would be reduced for the year or years involved. In addition, unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, the Company would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. A failure of the Company to qualify as a REIT would not necessarily give the Company the right to redeem the Preferred Shares, nor would it give the holders of the Preferred Shares the right to have their shares redeemed. Notwithstanding that the Company currently intends to operate in a manner designed to enable it to qualify as a REIT, future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause the Company to determine that it is in the best interest of the Company and the holders of its Common Stock and Preferred Shares to revoke the REIT election. As long as any Preferred Shares are outstanding, any such determination by the Company may not be made without the approval of a majority of the Independent Directors. The tax law prohibits the Company from electing treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of such revocation.

 

REIT requirements with respect to stockholder distributions

 

To qualify as a REIT under the Code, the Company generally will be required each year to distribute as dividends to its stockholders at least 90% of its “REIT taxable income” (excluding capital gains). Failure to comply with this requirement would result in the Company’s income being subject to tax at regular corporate rates. In addition, the Company will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which certain distributions considered as paid by it with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of its ordinary income for the calendar year, 95% of its capital gains net income for the calendar year and any undistributed taxable income from prior periods. Under certain circumstances, banking regulatory authorities may restrict the ability of the Company, as a subsidiary of the Bank, to make distributions to its stockholders. Such a restriction could subject

the Company to federal income and excise tax and result in the Company’s failure to meet REIT requirements with respect to stockholder distributions.

 

Redemption upon occurrence of a Tax Event

 

At any time following the occurrence of a Tax Event (as defined under “Description of Series A Preferred Shares — Redemption” in the 1998 Prospectus), the Company will have the right to redeem the Preferred Shares in whole but not in part. The occurrence of a Tax Event will not, however, give the holders of the Preferred Shares any right to have such shares redeemed.

 

Illinois Tax Law Change

 

Beginning January 1, 2009, Illinois required a “captive” REIT to increase its state taxable income by the amount of dividends paid. Under this law, a captive REIT includes a REIT of which 50% of the voting power or value of the beneficial interest or shares is owned by a single corporation. Management believes that the Company is classified as a “captive” REIT under Illinois law, in light of the fact that (1) all of the outstanding Common Stock are held by HCH, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, (2) the Common Stock represents more than 50% of the voting power of the Company’s equity securities and (3) the Common Stock is not listed for trading on an exchange. The 2010 Illinois statutory tax rate was 7.3% and for 2011 it will be 9.5%. Management believes that the Illinois state tax expense to be incurred by the Company has not and in future years should not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s ability to declare and pay future dividends on the Preferred Shares. This belief is based upon the ownership interest of the Company, whereby any tax expense incurred is expected to primarily reduce the net earnings available to the holder of the Company’s Common Stock.

 

Automatic exchange upon occurrence of the Exchange Event

 

Upon the occurrence of the Exchange Event, the outstanding Preferred Shares will be automatically exchanged on a one-for-one basis into Bank Preferred Shares. Assuming, as is anticipated to be the case, that the Bank Preferred Shares are nonvoting, the Automatic Exchange will be taxable, and each holder of Preferred Shares will have a gain or loss, as the case may be, measured by the difference between the basis of such holder in the Preferred Shares and the fair market value of the Bank Preferred Shares received in the Automatic Exchange. Assuming that such holder’s Preferred Shares were held as capital assets prior to the Automatic Exchange, any gain or loss will be capital gain or loss.

 

Relationship with the Bank and its affiliates; conflicts of interest

 

The Bank and its affiliates are involved in virtually every aspect of the Company’s existence. The Bank is the sole holder of the Common Stock of the Company and will administer the day-to-day activities of the Company in its role as Advisor under the Advisory Agreement. The Bank will also act as servicer of the Mortgage Loans on behalf of the Company under the Servicing Agreement. In addition, other than the Independent Directors and Non Bank Directors (as defined in Item 10), all of the officers and directors of the Company are also officers and/or directors of the Bank and/or affiliates of the Bank. Their compensation is paid by the Bank, and they have substantial responsibilities in connection with their work as officers of the Bank. As the holder of all of the outstanding voting stock of the Company, the Bank will have the right to elect all directors of the Company, including the Independent Directors.

 

The Bank and its affiliates may have interests which are not identical to those of the Company. Consequently, conflicts of interest may arise with respect to transactions, including without limitation, future acquisitions of Mortgage Assets from the Bank and/or affiliates of the Bank; servicing of Mortgage Loans; future dispositions of Mortgage Assets to the Bank; and the renewal, termination or modification of the Advisory Agreement or the Servicing Agreement. It is the intention of the Company and the Bank that any agreements and transactions between the Company, on the one hand, and the Bank and/or its affiliates, on the other hand, are fair to all parties and consistent with market terms, including prices paid and received for the Initial Mortgage Assets, on the acquisition or disposition of Mortgage Assets by the Company or in connection with the servicing of Mortgage Loans. The requirement in the terms of the Preferred Shares that certain actions of the Company be approved by a majority of

the Independent Directors is also intended to ensure fair dealings between the Company and the Bank and its affiliates. However, there can be no assurance that such agreements or transactions will be on terms as favorable to the Company as those that could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

 

Risk of future revisions in policies and strategies by Board of Directors

 

The Board of Directors has established the investment policies and operating policies and strategies of the Company, all material aspects of which are described in this report. These policies may be amended or revised from time to time at the discretion of the Board of Directors (in certain circumstances subject to the approval of a majority of the Independent Directors) without a vote of the Company’s stockholders, including holders of the Preferred Shares. The ultimate effect of any change in the policies and strategies of the Company on a holder of Preferred Shares may be positive or negative.

 

Possible leverage

 

Although the Company does not currently intend to incur any indebtedness in connection with the acquisition and holding of Mortgage Assets, the Company may do so at any time (although indebtedness in excess of 25% of the Company’s total stockholders’ equity may not be incurred without the approval of a majority of the Independent Directors of the Company). To the extent the Company were to change its policy with respect to the incurrence of indebtedness, the Company would be subject to risks associated with leverage, including, without limitation, changes in interest rates and prepayment risk.

 

Additional issuances of preferred stock could have dilutive effect

 

The Charter of the Company authorizes 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, 10,000,000 shares of which have been issued. The Company could issue additional preferred shares that rank equal to the Preferred Shares in the payment of dividends or in the distribution of assets on liquidation without the approval of the holders of the Preferred Shares. Such future issuances could have the effect of diluting the holders of the Preferred Shares.

 

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO THE BANK

 

Because of the possibility of the Automatic Exchange, an investment in Preferred Shares involves a high degree of risk with respect to the performance and capital levels of the Bank. Investors in the Preferred Shares should carefully consider the following risk factors and other considerations relating to the Bank before deciding whether to invest in such shares.

 

Possible adverse effects of economic conditions

 

Economic conditions beyond the Bank’s control may have a significant impact on the Bank’s operations, including changes in net interest income. Examples of such conditions include: (i) the strength of credit demand by customers; (ii) the introduction and growth of new investment instruments and transaction accounts by nonbank financial competitors; (iii) changes in the general level of interest rates, including changes resulting from the monetary activities of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (iv) adverse changes in the economic net worth of loan customers; (v) decline in the general level of employment; and (vi) increased levels of Federal government support and equity infusions intended for banks and other commercial enterprises. Economic growth in the Bank’s market areas is dependent upon the local economy. Continued adverse changes in the economy of the Chicago metropolitan area and other market areas would likely reduce the Bank’s growth rate and could otherwise have a negative effect on its business, including the demand for new loans, the ability of customers to repay loans and the value of the collateral pledged as security. Additionally, current conditions in credit and funding markets serving both corporate and consumer segments have remained weak, thereby causing a material contraction in the availability of credit as a result of more stringent underwriting standards. The Bank’s housing sector loan portfolio and related losses have primarily been concentrated in its commercial residential developer portfolio, in higher loan-to-value and broker sourced home equity loans as well as in its residential mortgage loan portfolio. The Bank has no significant exposures to sub-prime or ALT-A mortgages. The reduction in credit availability has contributed to reduced demand for new and existing homes, exacerbating an environment characterized by declining home

prices and rising rates of foreclosure. A similar credit dynamic has adversely impacted the cost and availability of credit to corporate borrowers, notably in the highly leveraged lower rated credits. The ultimate severity and duration of these developments remain subject to considerable uncertainty and the attendant adverse feedback effects could deepen and exacerbate exposures to the general economic risk factors to which the Bank is exposed.

 

Planned Acquisition of Marshall and Isley Corporation

 

On December 17, 2010, BMO announced it had reached a definitive agreement to purchase Marshall & Isley Corporation (“M&I”) in a common stock for common stock transaction. The purchase price will depend on the number of M&I common shares outstanding at the closing date and is estimated at $4.1 billion. BMO intends that M&I will ultimately merge with and into HFC immediately upon acquisition. In addition, BMO has agreed to have its subsidiary, Harris Financial Corporation (“HFC”) purchase M&I’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) preferred shares and warrants from the U.S. Treasury. At the time of acquisition, it is anticipated that the commercial banking operations of M&I will be merged with those of the Bank. Subject to regulatory approval and M&I shareholders’ vote, the acquisition is expected to close prior to July 31, 2011. At December 31, 2010, M&I’s assets and deposits totaled $50.8 billion and $38.3 billion, respectively. This acquisition would substantially increase the Bank’s assets, geographic presence, scope of operations and customer base. There can be no assurance that the resulting bank will be profitable or that returns on equity and assets would be maintained at a level comparable to what the Bank would otherwise earn excluding the M&I operations.

 

Increase in interest rates may adversely affect operating results

 

The Bank’s operating results depend to a large extent on its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest the Bank receives from its loans, securities and other assets and the interest the Bank pays on its deposits and other liabilities. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political conditions. Conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, money supply, international disorders and other factors beyond the control of the Bank may affect interest rates. If generally prevailing interest rates increase, the “net interest spread” of the Bank, which is the difference between the rates of interest earned and the rates of interest paid by the Bank, is likely to contract, resulting in less net interest income. The Bank’s liabilities generally have shorter terms and are more interest-sensitive than its assets. There can be no assurance that the Bank will be able to adjust its asset and liability positions sufficiently to offset any negative effect of changing market interest rates.

 

Competition

 

The Bank faces strong direct competition for deposits, loans and other financial services from other commercial banks, thrifts, credit unions, stockbrokers and finance divisions of auto and farm equipment companies. Some of the competitors are local, while others are statewide or nationwide. Several major multibank holding companies currently operate in the Chicago metropolitan area. Some of these financial institutions are larger than the Bank and have greater access to capital and other resources. Some of the financial institutions and financial services organizations with which the Bank competes are not subject to the same degree of regulation as that imposed on bank holding companies, and federally insured, state-chartered banks and national banks. As a result, such nonbank competitors have advantages over the Bank in providing certain services. The banking industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. The Bank’s future success will depend in part on its ability to address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as to create additional efficiencies in the Bank’s operations. Some of the Bank’s competitors have greater resources to invest in technological improvements. There can be no assurance that the Bank will be able to effectively implement such products and services or be successful in marketing such products and services to its customers.

Government regulation

 

The Bank is subject to extensive federal and state legislation, regulation and supervision. Recently enacted, proposed and future legislation and regulations have had, will continue to have or may have significant impact on the financial services industry. Some of the legislative and regulatory changes may benefit the Bank; others, however, may increase its costs of doing business and assist competitors of the Bank. In recent years, global regulators have proposed reforms that are intended to strengthen the banking sector regulatory capital and liquidity frameworks and strengthen the resilience of individual banking institutions in periods of stress, which are collectively referred to as Basel III. Based on regulatory guidance provided to date, the key building blocks of Basel III from a regulatory capital perspective include:

 

 

The Basel III rules are expected to be implemented in a phased approach. The final requirements and transition period applicable to BMO and Harris NA have not been established. The final requirements may increase the amount of capital that BMO and Harris NA are required to hold, and may have a negative impact on their results of operations.

 

On July 21, 2010, U.S. President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which is referred to as Dodd-Frank. Dodd-Frank is broad in scope and the Bank is currently assessing the impact of the legislation. The reforms include heightened consumer protection, regulation of the over-the-counter derivatives markets, restrictions on proprietary trading by banks, which is referred to as the Volcker Rule, imposition of heightened prudential standards and broader application of leverage and risk-based capital requirements, greater supervision of systemically significant payment, clearing or settlement systems, restrictions on interchange fees, and the creation of a new financial stability oversight council of regulators with the objective of increasing stability by monitoring systemic risks posed by financial services companies and their activities. Many aspects of Dodd-Frank are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate at this time the overall impact on the Bank or the financial services industry more generally. However, Dodd-Frank is likely to result in an increase in compliance costs and regulatory enforcement, particularly on the Bank’s U.S. business, and could have a negative impact on the Bank’s results of operations.

 

There can be no assurance that state or federal regulators will not, in the future, impose further restriction or limits on the Bank’s activities.

 

 

None.

 

 

None as of December 31, 2010.

 

 

The Company is not currently involved in any material litigation nor, to the Company’s knowledge is any material litigation currently threatened against the Company or the Bank other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. See Note 10 to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

HCH presently owns all 1,180 shares of the Common Stock of the Company, which are not listed or traded on any securities exchange. On March 4, 2009, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 1,000 shares to 5,000 shares. On March 5, 2009, the Company sold 180 shares of Common Stock to HCH for a purchase price of $444,444.44 per share, or $80,000,000 in cash, the proceeds of which was used to purchase Mortgage Assets. HCH continues to own 100% of the shares of the Common Stock. On December 30, 2009, the Company paid a cash dividend of $2 million (declared on December 2, 2009), on the outstanding common shares to the stockholder of record on December 15, 2009. Part of this dividend ($17,291) was considered a return of capital to the Company’s common shareholder rather than ordinary income. This has no impact on holders of the Preferred Stock. On June 22, 2009, the Company paid a cash dividend of $261 thousand (declared on May 28, 2009), on the outstanding common shares to the stockholders of record on June 15, 2009. No cash dividends were paid on the outstanding common shares during 2010.

 

The Preferred Shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “HBC Pr A”. During 2010 and 2009, the Company declared and paid $18.4 million in preferred dividends to preferred stockholders. Although the Company declared cash dividends on the Preferred Shares for 2010 and 2009, no assurances can be made as to the declaration of, or if declared, the amount of, future distributions since such distributions are subject to the Company’s financial condition and capital needs; the impact of legislation and regulations as then in effect or as may be proposed; economic conditions; and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to remain qualified as a REIT, the Company must distribute annually at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to preferred and /or common stockholders.

 

The Bank prepares notices relating to the Company’s dividend declaration on the Preferred Shares on the Bank’s website (www.harrisbank.com) under “Corporate Information/News Releases”. The information on the Bank’s website does not constitute a part of this Report.

 

The Company did not repurchase or redeem any Common Stock or Preferred Shares during 2010 or 2009. The Company did not authorize for issuance any securities of the Company under any equity compensation plans.

 

The following table sets forth selected financial data for the Company and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in this Report.

 

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing later in this Report.

 

Summary

 

Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to December 31, 2009

 

The Company’s net income for 2010 was $18.8 million. This represented an 8% decrease from 2009 net income of $20.4 million. Earnings decreased primarily because of a reduction in interest income on portfolio securities as market yields have declined significantly.

 

Interest income on securities purchased under agreement to resell for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $85 thousand on an average balance of $64 million with an average yield of .13% compared to interest income of $31 thousand on an average balance of $33 million with an average yield of .09% for 2009. Interest income on the Notes for 2010 totaled $222 thousand and yielded 6.4% on $3.5 million of average principal outstanding compared to $247 thousand and a 6.4% yield on $3.9 million average principal outstanding for 2009. The decrease in interest income from the Notes was attributable to a reduction in the Note balance because of customer payoffs in the Securing Mortgage Loans. The average outstanding balance of the Securing Mortgage Loans was $4 million for 2010 and $5 million for 2009. Interest income on securities available-for-sale for 2010 was $20.2 million, resulting in a yield of 4.0% on an average balance of $500 million compared to interest income of $22.4 million with a yield of 4.3% on an average balance of $518 million for 2009. There were no Company borrowings during either year.

 

Gains from investment securities sales were $326 thousand in 2010. There were no investment securities sales in 2009 or 2008.

 

Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 totaled $529 thousand compared to $607 thousand in 2009. Loan servicing expenses for 2010 totaled $11 thousand, a decrease of $1 thousand from 2009. This decrease was attributable to the reduction in the principal balance of the Notes. Advisory fees for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $167 thousand compared to $196 thousand, a 14.8% decrease from 2009, primarily due to certain charges for treasury services being assessed directly rather than as part of advisory fees in the current year. General and administrative expenses totaled $351 thousand for 2010 and $399 thousand for 2009, a 12.0% decrease from 2009 primarily as a result of decreased costs for insurance and legal fees offset by higher treasury costs.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to December 31, 2008

 

The Company’s net income for 2009 was $20.4 million. This represented a 1.3% decrease from 2008 net income of $20.7 million. Earnings decreased primarily because of the imposition of Illinois state income taxes on the Company beginning in 2009.

 

Interest income on securities purchased under agreement to resell for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $31 thousand on an average balance of $33 million with an average yield of .09% compared to interest income of $1 million on an average balance of $42 million with an average yield of 2.3% for 2008. Interest income on the Notes for 2009 totaled $247 thousand and yielded 6.4% on $3.9 million of average principal outstanding compared to $302 thousand and a 6.4% yield on $4.7 million average principal outstanding for 2008. The decrease in interest income from the Notes was attributable to a reduction in the Note balance because of customer payoffs in the Securing Mortgage Loans. The average outstanding balance of the Securing Mortgage Loans was $5 million for 2009 and $6 million for 2008. Interest income on securities available-for-sale for 2009 was $22.4 million, resulting in a yield of 4.3% on an average balance of $518 million compared to interest income of $20 million with a yield of 4.5% on an average balance of $444 million for 2008. There were no Company borrowings during either year.

 

Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled $607 thousand compared to $597 thousand a year ago. Loan servicing expenses for 2009 totaled $12 thousand, a decrease of $3 thousand from 2008. This decrease was attributable to the reduction in the principal balance of the Notes. Advisory fees for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $196 thousand compared to $208 thousand, a 5.8% decrease from 2008, primarily due to

certain charges for treasury services being assessed directly rather than as part of advisory fees in the current year. General and administrative expenses totaled $399 thousand for 2009 and $374 thousand for 2008, a 6.7% increase from 2008 primarily as a result of increased costs for legal and director fees and also due to change in assessing treasury costs.

 

Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Quarter Ended December 31, 2009

 

The Company’s net income for the fourth quarter of 2010 was $4.6 million and for the fourth quarter of 2009 was $5.1 million.

 

Interest income on securities available-for-sale for the current quarter was $4.8 million resulting in a yield of 3.8% on an average balance of $508 million, compared to interest income of $5.6 million with a yield of 4.3% on an average balance of $523 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease in these assets largely reflected the lower interest rates. Interest income on securities purchased under agreement to resell for the current quarter was $23 thousand on an average balance of $63 million resulting in an average yield of 0.15% compared to interest income of $7 thousand on an average balance of $41 million with an average yield of .01% for the same period in the year-ago quarter.

 

There were no Company borrowings during the fourth quarter of 2010 or 2009.

 

Fourth quarter 2010 operating expenses totaled $154 thousand, a decrease of $22 thousand from the fourth quarter of 2009. Advisory fees for the fourth quarter of 2010 were $31 thousand compared to $60 thousand in the prior year’s fourth quarter due to deceased costs for investment advisory services and administration. Loan servicing fees for the fourth quarter of 2010 and 2009 were $3 thousand. General and administrative expenses totaled $122 thousand in the current quarter compared to $113 thousand for the same period in 2009, reflecting increased costs for printing and expert services.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The Company does not currently maintain an allowance for loan losses due to the over-collateralization of the Securing Mortgage Loans and the prior and expected credit performance of the collateral pool and because the Company can, under certain conditions, require the Bank to dispose of nonperforming Mortgage Loans.

 

Concentrations of Credit Risk

 

The MBS portfolio securities currently held by the Company are all various issues of federal agency guaranteed conventional pass-through securities. The credit guarantees extended by Fannie Mae and FHLMC are characterized as full modification guarantees whereby the timely payment of both interest and principal is assured by the respective sponsoring federal agency.

 

A majority of the collateral underlying the Securing Mortgage Loans is located in Illinois. The financial viability of customers in this state is, in part, dependent on the state’s economy. The collateral may be subject to a greater risk of default than other comparable loans in the event of adverse economic, political or business developments or natural hazards that may affect such region and the ability of property owners in such region to make payments of principal and interest on the underlying mortgages. The Company’s maximum risk of accounting loss, should all customers in Illinois fail to perform according to contract terms and all collateral prove to be worthless, was approximately $2.6 million at December 31, 2010 and $2.9 million at December 31, 2009.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

The Company’s income consists primarily of interest payments on the Mortgage Assets and the securities it holds. If there is a decline in interest rates during a period of time when the Company must reinvest payments of interest and principal with respect to its Mortgage Assets and other interest earning assets, the Company may find it difficult to purchase additional earning assets that generate sufficient income to support payment of dividends on the Preferred Shares. Because the rate at which dividends, if, when and as authorized and declared, are payable on the Preferred Shares is fixed, there can be no assurance that an interest rate environment in which there is a decline in interest rates would not adversely affect the Company’s ability to pay dividends on the Preferred Shares.

Competition

 

The Company does not engage in the business of originating mortgage loans. While the Company may acquire additional Mortgage Assets, it anticipates that such assets will be acquired from the Bank, affiliates of the Bank or unaffiliated parties. Accordingly, the Company does not expect to compete with mortgage conduit programs, investment banking firms, savings and loan associations, banks, thrift and loan associations, finance companies, mortgage bankers or insurance companies in originating Mortgage Assets.

 

Liquidity Risk Management

 

The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the availability of sufficient cash flows to meet all of the Company’s financial commitments. In managing liquidity, the Company takes into account various legal limitations placed on a REIT.

 

The Company’s principal liquidity needs are to maintain the current portfolio size through the acquisition of additional qualifying assets and to pay dividends to its stockholders after satisfying obligations to creditors. The acquisition of additional qualifying assets is funded with the proceeds obtained from repayment of principal balances by individual mortgages or maturities of securities held for sale on a reinvested basis. The payment of dividends on the Preferred Shares will be made from legally available funds, principally arising from operating activities of the Company. The Company’s cash flows from operating activities principally consist of the collection of interest on short term qualifying investments, the Notes and mortgage-backed securities. The Company does not have and does not anticipate having any material capital expenditures.

 

In order to remain qualified as a REIT, the Company must distribute annually at least 90% of its adjusted REIT ordinary taxable income, as provided for under the Code, to its common and preferred stockholders. The Company currently expects to distribute dividends annually equal to 90% or more of its adjusted REIT ordinary taxable income.

 

The Company anticipates that cash and cash equivalents on hand and the cash flow from the Notes, short-term investments and mortgage-backed securities will provide adequate liquidity for its operating, investing and financing needs including the capacity to continue preferred dividend payments on an uninterrupted basis.

 

As presented in the accompanying consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, the primary sources of funds in addition to the $18.6 million provided from operations during 2010 were $395.3 million from the maturities and sales of securities available-for-sale. In 2009, the primary sources of funds other than $20.4 million provided from operations were $272.5 million from the maturities of securities available-for-sale and $80 million from the purchase of the Company’s common stock by HCH. The primary uses of funds for 2010 were $394.5 million in purchases of securities available-for-sale and $18.4 million in Preferred Share dividends. In 2009, the primary uses of funds were $336.7 million in purchases of securities available-for-sale and $18.4 million and $2.3 million in Preferred Share dividends and Common Stock dividends paid, respectively.

 

Accounting Pronouncements

 

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements”, as of January 1, 2010. The standard amends ASC 820-10 to require new disclosures about transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 clarifies existing disclosure requirements regarding the level of disaggregation of each class of assets and liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial condition and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of the standard had no impact on the corporation’s financial position or results of operations. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on fair value of financial instruments. The standard also requires new disclosures about the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements which will be effective January 1, 2011.

Tax Matters

 

As of December 31, 2010, the Company believes that it is in full compliance with the REIT federal income tax rules, and expects to qualify as a REIT under the provisions of the Code. The Company expects to meet all REIT requirements regarding the ownership of its stock and anticipates meeting the annual distribution requirements. Beginning January 1, 2009, Illinois requires a “captive” REIT to increase its state taxable income by the amount of dividends paid. Under this law, a captive REIT includes a REIT of which 50% of the voting power or value of the beneficial interest or shares is owned by a single corporation. Management believes that the Company is classified as a “captive” REIT under Illinois law, in light of the fact that (1) all of the outstanding Common Stock is held by HCH a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, (2) the Common Stock represents more than 50% of the voting power of the Company’s equity securities and (3) the Common Stock is not listed for trading on an exchange. Management believes that the state tax expense to be incurred by the Company in future years should not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s ability to declare and pay future dividends on the preferred shares. This belief is based upon the ownership interest of the Company, whereby any tax expense incurred is expected to primarily reduce the net earnings available to the holder of the Company’s Common Stock. The Illinois statutory tax rate for 2010 was 7.3% and the tax rate for 2011 will be 9.5%. For the fourth quarter and twelve months of 2010, $366 thousand and $1.5 million of Illinois income tax expense was recorded, respectively.

 

Ratings Adjustment

 

On January 22, 2010, Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) downgraded its long-term ratings for Bank of Montreal (“BMO”) (the Company’s ultimate parent). BMO’s deposit rating dropped to Aa2 from Aa1 and its bank financial strength rating (BFSR) fell to B- from B. Further, Moody’s downgraded BMO’s preferred stock securities (which include non-cumulative preferred shares and other hybrid capital instruments) four notches to BaaI from Aa3. The first notch reflected the BFSR downgrade. The other three notches were a consequence of Moody’s implementing a revised methodology for rating bank hybrid securities. At that time, Moody’s downgraded the bank financial strength rating of the Bank to C+ from B-. In addition, Moody’s lowered its rating for the Company’s Preferred Stock from A2 to Baa1 and described this action as reflecting both the BFSR downgrade and Moody’s implementation of the aforementioned revised methodology.

 

 

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $3.4 million invested in Notes, a decrease of $215 thousand from December 31, 2009. The decline was attributable to customer payoffs in the Securing Mortgage Loans. At December 31, 2010, the Company held $517 million in residential mortgage-backed securities compared to $515 million at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had $40 million in U.S. Treasury Securities. At December 31, 2010, the Company held an investment of $24 million in securities purchased from the Bank under agreement to resell compared to $22 million at December 31, 2009. The Company is subject to exposure for fluctuations in interest rates. Adverse changes in interest rates could impact negatively the value of mortgage-backed securities, as well as the levels of interest income to be derived from these assets.

 

The following table stratifies the Company’s available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2010 by maturity date (in thousands of dollars):

 

 

The Company’s investments held in residential mortgage-backed securities are secured by adjustable and fixed interest rate residential mortgage loans. The yield to maturity on each security depends on, among other things, the

price at which each such security is purchased, the rate and timing of principal payments (including prepayments, repurchases, defaults and liquidations), the pass-through rate and interest rate fluctuations. Changes in interest rates could impact prepayment rates as well as default rates, which in turn would impact the value and yield to maturity of the Company’s residential mortgage-backed securities.

 

The Company currently has no outstanding borrowings.

 

 

Refer to the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements for the required information.

 

 

There have been no disagreements with accountants on any matter of accounting principles, practices or financial statement disclosure.

 

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As of December 31, 2010, Paul R. Skubic, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Pamela C. Piarowski, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information for the Company required to be included in this Report has been made known to them in a timely fashion.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

The management of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the framework and criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.

 

This report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s

registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption for non-accelerated filers under Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Return and Consumer Protection Act.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with such evaluations that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Not applicable.

 

 

The Company’s Board of Directors consists of five members. The Company does not anticipate that it will require any employees because it has retained the Bank to perform certain functions pursuant to the Advisory Agreement described above. Each officer of the Company currently is also an officer of the Bank and/or affiliates of the Bank. The Company maintains corporate records and audited financial statements that are separate from those of the Bank or any of the Bank’s affiliates. None of the officers, directors or employees of the Company will have a direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any Mortgage Asset to be acquired or disposed of by the Company or in any transaction in which the Company has an interest or will engage in acquiring, holding and managing Mortgage Assets.

 

Pursuant to terms of the Preferred Shares, the Company’s Independent Directors (as defined in Item 13 (c) below) will consider the interests of the holders of both the Preferred Shares and the Common Stock in determining whether any proposed action requiring their approval is in the best interests of the Company.

 

The persons who are directors and executive officers of the Company are as follows:

 

 

The following is a summary of the business experience of the directors of the Company:

 

Mr. Skubic has been a director of the Company since inception, January 2, 1998. Mr. Skubic has been Vice President and Controller of the Bank and Chief Accounting Officer for Harris Bankcorp, Inc. and the Bank since 1990. Prior to joining Harris Bankcorp, Inc., Mr. Skubic was employed by Arthur Andersen & Co. He is a certified public accountant. Based primarily upon Mr. Skubic’s extensive 20 year management and leadership experience as the Vice President and Controller of a national banking association and as the Chief Accounting Officer for Harris Bankcorp, Inc.; strong strategic planning, accounting, financial, banking and risk analysis skills and experience; and tenure and contributions as a current officer, Board member and Board committee member, the Board determined that Mr. Skubic should serve as a director of the Company at the time of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Mr. Wacker has been a director of the Company since inception, January 2, 1998. Mr. Wacker is a retired partner from Arthur Andersen & Co. since 1987 after 34 years. From July 1988 to November 1990, he was Vice President -Treasurer, Parkside Medical Services, a subsidiary of Lutheran General Health System. From November 1990 to September 1993, he completed various financial consulting projects for Lutheran General. He is a Certified

Public Accountant. Based primarily upon Mr. Wacker’s extensive 40-year management and leadership experience as a former partner of a national accounting firm and as former Vice President-Treasurer and financial consultant for a health care system; strong accounting, financial and risk analysis skills and experience; and tenure and contributions as a current Board member and Board committee member, the Board determined that Mr. Wacker should serve as a director of the Company at the time of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Mr. Blockowicz has been a director of the Company since inception, January 2, 1998. Mr. Blockowicz is a Certified Public Accountant and is a partner with Blockowicz & Tognocchi LLC. Prior to forming his firm, Mr. Blockowicz was a partner with Arthur Andersen & Co. through 1990. Blockowicz & Tognocchi LLC is a professional tax consulting firm and is not a parent, subsidiary or other affiliate of the Company. Based primarily upon Mr. Blockowicz’s extensive 33-year management and leadership experience as a former partner of a national accounting firm and as a partner of a professional tax consulting firm; strong taxation, accounting and financial skills and experience; and tenure and contributions as a current Board member and Board committee chairperson, the Board determined that Mr. Blockowicz should serve as a director of the Company at the time of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Mr. Schneider has been a director of the Company since 2000. Mr. Schneider is Vice President of Lane Industries, Inc (until September 30, 2010 Mr. Schneider served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Lane Industries). Mr. Schneider has been a director of Lane Industries, a diversified holding company from 2000 until September 30, 2010. He has been employed by Lane Industries since 1976. Lane Industries is not a parent, subsidiary or other affiliate of the Company. He is a graduate of the University of Illinois at Chicago, where he received his B.S. in Finance. He also holds a M.S. in Finance from the University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign. Mr. Schneider served as a director of General Binding Corporation (NASDAQ) from 2000 until 2005 and served on the governance and compensation committees. Mr. Schneider served as a director of ACCO Brands Corporation (NYSE) from 2005 until 2006. Based primarily upon Mr. Schneider’s extensive 10 year executive management and leadership experience as a President, Chief Executive Officer and director of a diversified holding company; strong strategic planning, financial, risk analysis and administrative skills and experience; and tenure and contributions as a current Board member and Board committee member, the Board determined that Mr. Schneider should serve as a director of the Company at the time of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Mr. Novosel has been a director of the Company since inception, January 2, 1998. Mr. Novosel was a Vice President in the Treasury Group of the Bank from 1995 and served as Treasurer of the Company until his retirement from the Bank in November, 2008. Previously, he served as Treasurer of Harris Bankcorp, Inc. Mr. Novosel is a Chartered Financial Analyst and a member of the CFA Society of Chicago. Based primarily upon Mr. Novosel’s extensive 25-year management and leadership experience as a former Vice President of the Bank and former Treasurer of the Company; strong strategic planning, financial, banking and risk analysis skills and experience; and tenure and contributions as a current Board member and Board committee member, the Board determined that Mr. Novosel should serve as a director of the Company at the time of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

The following is a summary of the business experience of the executive officers who are not directors of the Company:

 

Ms. Piarowski has been Chief Financial Officer of the Company since May 31, 2006 and Treasurer since 2008, although she previously served as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of Harris Bankcorp, Inc. from June 2001 through July 2003. In 2003, she was appointed Vice-President, Financial Performance Management, Bank of Montreal. In April, 2006 she was appointed Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, BMO US. She is a certified public accountant.

 

Ms. Sulkin has been a Vice President in the Taxation Department of the Bank since 1992. Ms. Sulkin has been employed by the Bank since 1984. Prior to joining the Bank, she was employed by KPMG LLP. She is a certified public accountant.

 

Independent Directors

 

The terms of the Preferred Shares require that, as long as any Preferred Shares are outstanding, certain actions by the Company be approved by a majority of the Company’s Independent Directors (as defined in Item 13

(c) below). Delbert J. Wacker, David J. Blockowicz and Forrest M. Schneider are the Company’s Independent Directors.

 

If at any time the Company fails to declare and pay a quarterly dividend payment on the Preferred Shares, the number of directors then constituting the Board of Directors of the Company will be increased by two at the Company’s next annual meeting and the holders of Preferred Shares, voting together with the holders of any other outstanding series of preferred stock as a single class, will be entitled to elect two additional directors to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors. Any member of the Board of Directors elected by holders of the Company’s Preferred Shares will be deemed to be an Independent Director for purposes of the actions requiring the approval of a majority of the Independent Directors.

 

Audit Committee

 

The Board of Directors of the Company has established an Audit Committee, with an approved Audit Committee Charter, which will review the engagement of an independent registered public accounting firm and review their independence. The Audit Committee will also review the adequacy of the Company’s internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee is comprised of Delbert J. Wacker, David J. Blockowicz and Forrest M. Schneider. David J.Blockowicz is the chairperson of the Audit Committee. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is an Audit Committee financial expert as defined in rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each Audit Committee member is an Independent Director (as defined in Item 13 (c) below).

 

Investment Committee

 

In November 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company established an Investment Committee, with an approved Investment Committee Charter, which will assist the Board of Directors in discharging its oversight responsibilities in reviewing the Company’s investment policies, strategies, transactions and performance, and in overseeing the Company’s capital and financial resources. The Investment Committee is required to be composed of at least two members of the Board of Directors, with one appointed chairperson. The Investment Committee is comprised of the Committee chairperson, Frank M. Novosel and Paul R. Skubic.

 

Compensation of Directors

 

The Company pays directors who are not currently officers of the Bank or its affiliates (“Non Bank Director”) and Independent Directors (as defined in Item 13 (c) below) fees for their services as directors. For the Company’s 2010 fiscal year, Non Bank Directors and Independent Directors received a fee of $3,000 per quarter, and $4,000 per quarter for services to the Investment Committee. Directors also received $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors and Audit Committee that they attended. The following table shows the compensation received in 2010. The Company has not paid and does not currently intend to pay any compensation to directors who are not Independent Directors or to Non Bank Directors or who are active Bank officers.

 

 

 

 

The Company has adopted a code of ethics for its senior officers, including the executive officers, which is filed as an Exhibit hereto.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Based on a review of reports filed with respect to the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company believes that all ownership reports were filed on a timely basis.

 

 

The Company has not paid and does not currently intend to pay any compensation to its officers or employees or to directors who are not Independent Directors or Non Bank Directors or who are active Bank officers.

 

 

 

No person owns of record or is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding 73/8% Noncumulative Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A.

 

 

The following table shows the ownership as of March 30, 2011 of 73/8% Noncumulative Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A, by the officers or directors who own any such shares.

 

 

 

 

The Bank, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, HCH, indirectly owns 100% of the Common Stock of the Company. Paul R. Skubic, Chairman of the Board of the Company, its executive officers, Pamela C. Piarowski, and Margaret M. Sulkin, are also officers of the Bank.

 

A substantial portion of the assets of the Company initially consisted of Notes issued by the Bank. The Notes mature on October 1, 2027 and pay interest at 6.4% per annum. During 2010, the Company received repayments on the Notes of $215 thousand compared to 2009 repayments of $700 thousand. In years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Bank paid interest on the Notes in the amount of $222 thousand, $246 thousand and $302 thousand, respectively, to the Company.

 

The Company purchases U.S. Treasury and Federal agency securities from the Bank under agreements to resell identical securities. At December 31, 2010, the Company held $24 million of such assets and earned $85 thousand of interest from the Bank during 2010. At December 31, 2009, the Company held $22 million of such assets and earned $31 thousand of interest for 2009. The Company receives rates on these assets comparable to the rates that the Bank offers to unrelated counterparties under similar circumstances.

 

The Bank and the Company have entered into a Servicing Agreement and an Advisory Agreement, the terms of which are described in further detail on page 5 of this report. In 2010, the Bank received payments of $11 thousand and $167 thousand, respectively, compared to $12 thousand and $196 thousand for 2009, under the terms of these agreements.

 

The terms of the Preferred Shares require that, as long as any Preferred Shares are outstanding, certain actions by the Company, including transactions with the Bank and other related persons, be approved by a majority of the Independent Directors (as defined in the following paragraph). Each of the transactions described in Item 13(a) above was approved by a majority of the Independent Directors.

 

 

The Articles of Incorporation (the “Charter”) of the Company defines an “Independent Director” as one who is not a current officer or employee of the Company or a current director, officer or employee of the Bank or of its affiliates. In addition, pursuant to the Charter, so long as the Preferred Shares are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange, a director shall not be deemed to be an “Independent Director” unless he or she meets the applicable requirements for independence as set forth under New York Stock Exchange rules and regulations.

 

 

Audit Fees

 

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s principal accountant billed $65 thousand and $67 thousand, respectively for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in Form 10-Q filings.

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

There were no fees billed for services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements outside of those fees disclosed above under “Audit Fees” for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

 

Tax Fees

 

There were no fees billed for tax-related services for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

 

All Other Fees

 

There were no other fees billed to the Company by the Company’s principal accountants other than those disclosed above for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

 

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

 

Prior to engaging accountants to perform a particular service, the Board of Directors obtains an estimate for the service to be performed. All of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee and Board of Directors in accordance with its procedures.

 

 

(a) Documents filed with Report:

 

(1) Consolidated Financial Statements (See page 27 for a listing of all financial statements included in Item 8)

 

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

 

All schedules normally required by Form 10-K are omitted since they are either not applicable or because the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits:

 

 

 

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

The following consolidated financial statements are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

 

 

All schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes hereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Harris Preferred Capital Corporation has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 31st day of March, 2011.

 

Paul R. Skubic

Chairman of the Board and President

 

Pamela C. Piarowski

Chief Financial Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by Paul R. Skubic, Chairman of the Board and President of the Company, as attorney-in-fact for the following Directors on behalf of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation of the 31st day of March 2011.

 

 

Supplemental Information

 

No proxy statement will be sent to security holders in 2011.

 

The Stockholders and Board of Directors

of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation and subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

/s/KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 31, 2011

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

 

Consolidated Statements of Income

and Comprehensive Income

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

 

Notes to consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation (the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation whose principal business objective is to acquire, hold, finance and manage qualifying real estate investment trust (“REIT”) assets (the “Mortgage Assets”), consisting of a limited recourse note or notes (the “Notes”) issued by Harris N.A. (the “Bank”) secured by real estate mortgage assets (the “Securing Mortgage Loans”) and other obligations secured by real property, as well as certain other qualifying REIT assets. The Company holds its assets through a Maryland real estate investment trust subsidiary, Harris Preferred Capital Trust. The Company has elected to be a REIT under sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and will generally not be subject to Federal income tax to the extent that it meets all of the REIT requirements in the Code Sections 856-860. All of the 1,180 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Common Stock”), are owned by Harris Capital Holdings, Inc. (“HCH”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank. On December 30, 1998, the Bank transferred its ownership of the common stock of the Company to HCH. The Bank is required to maintain direct or indirect ownership of at least 80% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company for as long as any 73/8% Noncumulative Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Preferred Shares”), $1.00 par value, is outstanding. The Company was formed to provide the opportunity to invest in residential mortgages and other real estate assets and to provide the Bank with a cost-effective means of raising capital for federal regulatory purposes.

 

On February 11, 1998, the Company completed an initial public offering (the “Offering”) of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s Preferred Shares, receiving proceeds of $242,125,000, net of underwriting fees. The Preferred Shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Concurrent with the issuance of the Preferred Shares, the Bank contributed additional capital of $250 million to the Company.

 

On March 4, 2009, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 1,000 shares to 5,000 shares. On March 5, 2009, the Company entered into a contribution agreement with HCH pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell 180 shares of Common Stock to HCH for a purchase price of $444,444.44 per share, or $80,000,000 in cash. HCH acquired the shares on March 5, 2009 and continues to own 100% of the shares of the Common Stock. The Company utilized proceeds from the Common Stock issuance to acquire assets in a manner consistent with Company investment guidelines.

 

Events occurring subsequent to the date of the balance sheet have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on deposit with the Bank and securities purchased from the Bank under agreement to resell.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The allowance for probable loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for probable loan losses or losses on Notes Receivable collateralized by loans. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operating expense and reduced by net charge-offs. Known losses of principal on impaired loans are charged off. The provision for loan losses is based on past loss experience, management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio securing the Mortgage Assets under current economic conditions and management’s estimate of anticipated, but as yet not specifically identified, loan losses. Such estimates are reviewed periodically and adjustments, if necessary, are recorded during the periods in which they become known. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, no allowance for loan losses was recorded under this policy.

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

 

Notes to consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1998 and intends to comply with the provisions of the Code with respect thereto. The Company does not expect to be subject to Federal income tax because assets, income distribution and stock ownership tests in Code Sections 856-860 are met. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes is included in the accompanying financial statements. Beginning January 1, 2009 the Company is classified as a “captive” REIT for Illinois tax purposes. As a captive REIT, the Company will not claim a deduction for dividends paid and will accrue Illinois income tax on Illinois taxable income. At December 31, 2010 the Company has provided $1.1 million of deferred Illinois taxes on unrealized holdings gains recognized in comprehensive income. At December 31, 2009 the Company provided $973 thousand of deferred Illinois taxes on unrealized holdings gains recognized in comprehensive income.

 

The REIT Modernization Act, which took effect on January 1, 2001, modified certain provisions of the Code with respect to the taxation of REITs. A key provision of this tax law change reduced the required level of distributions by a REIT from 95% to 90% of ordinary taxable income.

 

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded deferred state income taxes related to unrealized holding gains in its investment portfolio. These taxes would be payable in future periods, assuming such gains were realized. During 2010, a security was sold with a gain of $326 thousand and related state tax payment of $24 thousand.

 

Securities

 

The Company classifies all securities as available-for-sale, even if the Company has no current plans to divest. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity net of related tax effects.

 

Interest income on securities, including amortization of discount or premium on an effective yield basis, is included in earnings. Realized gains and losses, as a result of securities sales, are included in gain or loss on sale of securities in the consolidated statement of income, with the cost of securities sold determined on the specific identification basis.

 

The Company purchases U.S. Treasury and Federal agency securities from the Bank under agreements to resell identical securities. The amounts advanced under these agreements represent short-term assets and are reflected as securities purchased under agreement to resell in the consolidated balance sheet. Securities purchased under agreement to resell totaled $24 million at December 31, 2010 compared to $22 million at December 31, 2009. The securities underlying the agreements are book-entry securities. Securities are transferred by appropriate entry into the Company’s account with the Bank under a written custodial agreement with the Bank that explicitly recognizes the Company’s interest in these securities.

 

The Company’s investment securities are exposed to various risks such as interest rate, market and credit. Due to the level of risk associated with certain investment securities and the level of uncertainty related to changes in the value of investment securities, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in risks in the near term would materially affect the carrying value of investments in securities available-for-sale currently reported in the consolidated balance sheet.

 

Available-for-sale securities and other investments are subject to ongoing other-than-temporary impairment reviews. In determining whether a loss is temporary, factors considered include the extent of the unrealized loss, the length of time that the security has been in an unrealized loss position, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and whether the Company has the intent to sell the security or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investment before the recovery of the investment’s amortized cost basis. If a decline is considered to be other-than-temporary, a write-down is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

 

Notes to consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Income as other-than-temporary impairment on securities, and a new cost basis is established. In the event an available-for-sale debt security is considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired and the Company does not intend to sell the security, then the amount of the impairment charge equal to the credit loss is recorded in earnings and the remaining non credit-related impairment charge is recorded in other comprehensive income.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements”, as of January 1, 2010. The standard amends ASC 820-10 to require new disclosures about transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 clarifies existing disclosure requirements regarding the level of disaggregation of each class of assets and liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial condition and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of the standard had no impact on the corporation’s financial position or results of operations. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on fair value of financial instruments. The standard also requires new disclosures about the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements which will be effective January 1, 2011.

 

Management’s Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

 

On February 11, 1998, proceeds received from the Offering were used in part to purchase $356 million of Notes at a fixed rate of 6.4%. The Notes are secured by mortgage loans originated by the Bank. The principal amount of the Notes equals approximately 80% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Securing Mortgage Loans. During 2010, the Company received repayments on the Notes of $215 thousand compared to 2009 repayments of $700 thousand. For years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Bank paid interest on the Notes in the amount of $222 thousand, $246 thousand and $302 thousand, respectively, to the Company.

 

The Notes are recourse only to the Securing Mortgage Loans that are secured by real property. The Notes mature on October 1, 2027. Payments of principal and interest on the Notes are recorded monthly from payments received on the Securing Mortgage Loans. The Company has a security interest in the real property securing the underlying mortgage loans and is entitled to enforce payment on the Securing Mortgage Loans in its own name if a mortgagor should default. In the event of default, the Company has the same rights as the original mortgagee to foreclose the mortgaged property and satisfy the obligations of the Bank out of the proceeds. The Securing Mortgage Loans are serviced by the Bank, as agent of the Company.

 

The Company intends that each mortgage loan securing the Notes will represent a first lien position and will be originated in the ordinary course of the Bank’s real estate lending activities based on the underwriting standards generally applied (at the time of origination) for the Bank’s own account. The Company also intends that all Mortgage Assets held by the Company will meet market standards, and servicing guidelines promulgated by the Company, and Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) guidelines and procedures.

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

 

Notes to consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

The balance of Securing Mortgage Loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $4.2 million and $4.7 million, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on those loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was 5.7% and 5.9%, respectively.

 

None of the Securing Mortgage Loans collateralizing the Notes were on nonaccrual status at December 31, 2010 or 2009.

 

A majority of the collateral securing the underlying mortgage loans is located in Illinois. The financial viability of customers in Illinois is, in part, dependent on that state’s economy. The Company’s maximum risk of accounting loss, should all customers in Illinois fail to perform according to contract terms and all collateral prove to be worthless, was approximately $2.6 million at December 31, 2010 and $2.9 million at December 31, 2009.

 

 

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale were as follows:

 

 

The following table summarizes residential mortgage-backed securities with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the amount of the unrealized loss and the related fair value of the securities with unrealized losses. The unrealized losses have been further segregated by residential mortgage-backed securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 or more months. As of December 31, 2010 there were no securities that were in a loss position for 12 or more months. Management believes that all of the unrealized losses are temporary, since the unrealized losses on investments in mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasuries reflect changes in interest rates rather than credit deterioration. The contractual cash flows of these securities are guaranteed by a U.S. government-sponsored enterprise. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. There was a $302 thousand reclassification adjustment for realized securities gains to other comprehensive income during 2010. There were no reclassification adjustments to other comprehensive income during 2009 or 2008.

 

December 31, 2010

 

Harris Preferred Capital Corporation

 

Notes to consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

December 31, 2009

 

 

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of total available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2010, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities can differ from contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.