sv3asr
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 7, 2011
Registration
No. 333-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form S-3
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
Rambus Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-3112828
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
1050 Enterprise Way,
Suite 700
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
(408) 462-8000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
Thomas R. Lavelle
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Rambus Inc.
1050 Enterprise Way, Suite 700
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
(408) 462-8000
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copy to:
Aaron J. Alter
Robert T. Ishii
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
(650) 493-9300
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this Registration Statement.
If the only securities being registered on this Form are being
offered pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans,
please check the following
box. o
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than
securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest
reinvestment plans, check the following
box. þ
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a registration statement pursuant to General
Instruction I.D. or a post-effective amendment thereto that
shall become effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant
to Rule 462(e) under the Securities Act, check the
following
box. þ
If this Form is a post-effective amendment to a registration
statement filed pursuant to General Instruction I.D. filed
to register additional securities or additional classes of
securities pursuant to Rule 413(b) under the Securities
Act, check the following
box. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION
FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Registration
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
to be Registered(1)
|
|
|
Price Per Share(2)
|
|
|
Offering Price(2)
|
|
|
Fee
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
|
|
6,380,806
|
|
|
$13.86
|
|
|
$88,437,971
|
|
|
$10,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Pursuant to Rule 416(a) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Registration Statement
shall also cover any additional shares of the Registrants
common stock that become issuable by reason of any stock
dividend, stock split, recapitalization or other similar
transaction effected without receipt of consideration that
increases the number of the Registrants outstanding shares
of common stock.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Estimated in accordance with
Rule 457(c) solely for purposes of calculating the
registration fee on the basis of the average of the high and low
prices of Registrants common stock as reported on The
NASDAQ Global Select Market on June 6, 2011.
|
PROSPECTUS
DATED JUNE 7, 2011
6,380,806 SHARES
Common Stock
The selling stockholders of Rambus Inc. (Rambus,
we, or the Company) listed herein may
offer and resell up to 6,380,806 shares of Rambus common
stock under this prospectus. The selling stockholders acquired
these shares from us pursuant to a Merger Agreement dated
May 12, 2011, by and among Rambus, Padlock Acquisition
Corp., a California corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Rambus, Cryptography Research, Inc. (CRI), a
California corporation and the shareholder representative, in
connection with our acquisition of CRI. The selling stockholders
(which term as used herein includes their respective donees,
transferees, assignees or other successors in interest) may sell
these shares through public or private transactions at market
prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices.
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by
the selling stockholders.
Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol RMBS. On June 6, 2011, the last reported
sale price for our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market was
$13.68 per share.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 4.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give
any information or to represent anything not contained in this
prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or
representations. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the
shares offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in
jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information
contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information contained
elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all
the information that you should consider before investing in our
common stock. You should read the following summary together
with the more detailed information regarding our company, the
common stock being registered hereby, and our financial
statements and notes thereto incorporated by reference in this
prospectus.
Overview
We are a premier intellectual property and technology licensing
company. Our primary focus is the creation, design, development
and licensing of patented innovations, technologies and
architectures that are foundational to nearly all digital
electronics products and systems. Our patented innovations and
technologies aim to improve the performance, power efficiency,
time-to-market
and cost-effectiveness of our customers products,
components and systems offered and used in semiconductors,
computers, mobile applications, gaming and graphics, consumer
electronics, lighting displays and general lighting. By
licensing our patented innovations and technologies, we hope to
continuously enrich the end-user experience of the digital
electronics products and systems marketed and sold by our
customers and licensees. We believe we have established an
unparalleled licensing platform and business model that will
continue to foster the development of new foundational and
leading innovations and technologies. As a result, our goal is
to create significant licensing opportunities, and thereby
perpetuate strong company operating performance and long term
stockholder value.
While we have historically focused our efforts in developing and
licensing patented innovations and technologies for the
semiconductor industry, particularly in the area of chip
interfaces, we have initiated diversification efforts to expand
our portfolio of patented innovations and technologies into
lighting and displays, mobile communications, and additional
semiconductor technologies. We expect to continue this
diversification initiative through the acquisition of assets and
the hiring of the inventors, scientists and engineers who will
lead the effort to further develop these patented innovations
and technologies in these new areas of focus. During 2010, we
initiated an internal structural reorganization to establish
separate business groups for our semiconductor industry focused
operations (Semiconductor Business Group or
SBG) and operations focused on new or emerging
licensing opportunities (New Business Group or
NBG) which includes our lighting and display
technology (LDT) group. We expect this internal
realignment to help drive efficiencies in operations and
optimize our licensing platform and business model as we expand
and diversify into new markets.
As of December 31, 2010, our semiconductor, chip interface,
lighting, display and other technologies are covered by
approximately 1,180 U.S. and foreign patents. Additionally,
we have approximately 850 patent applications pending. These
patents and patent applications cover important inventions in
memory and logic chip interfaces, optoelectronics, mobile
applications and other technologies. Some of the patents and
pending patent applications are derived from a common parent
patent application or are foreign counterpart patent
applications. We have a program to file applications for and
obtain patents in the United States and in selected foreign
countries where we believe filing for such protection is
appropriate and would further our overall strategy and
objectives. In some instances, obtaining appropriate levels of
protection may involve prosecuting continuation and counterpart
patent applications based on a common parent application. We
believe that our patented innovations provide our customers
means to achieve higher performance, improved power efficiency,
lower risk, and greater cost-effectiveness in their digital
electronics products and systems.
Our patented innovations and technologies are offered to our
customers through either a patent license or a technology
license. Our revenues are primarily derived from patent
licenses, through which we provide a license to our broad
portfolio of patented innovations primarily to semiconductor and
system companies who use these innovations in the development
and manufacture of their own products. Our patent licensing
agreements may provide a license to all or part of our patent
portfolio for a particular use, product or technology. The
patent license essentially provides our customers with a defined
right to use our patented innovations in the customers own
digital electronics products and systems. Patent license
agreements are generally structured with variable royalty
payments, although some agreements include fixed payments over
certain defined periods.
We also offer our customers technology licenses. We typically
offer technology licenses to support the implementation and
adoption of our patented innovations and technologies through
know-how and technology transfers, product design, development,
and system integration consulting and engineering services. Our
technology license offerings also include a range of solutions
developed by Rambus, which include leadership
solutions (which are Rambus-proprietary solutions widely
licensed to our customers) and industry-standard solutions that
we provide to
1
our customers under license for incorporation into our
customers digital electronics products and systems. Due to
the often complex nature of implementing
state-of-the
art technology, we also offer engineering services to our
customers to help them successfully integrate our solutions into
their digital electronics products and systems. These technology
license agreements may have both a fixed price (non-recurring)
component and ongoing royalties. Engineering services are
generally offered on a fixed price basis. Further, under
technology licenses, our customers typically receive licenses to
our patents necessary to implement these solutions in their
products with specific rights and restrictions to the applicable
patents elaborated in their individual contracts with us.
We were founded in 1990 and reincorporated in Delaware in March
1997. Our principal executive offices are located at 1050
Enterprise Way, Suite 700, Sunnyvale, California. Our
Internet address is www.rambus.com. The contents of our website
are not incorporated by reference in or otherwise a part of this
prospectus.
Recent
Developments
On May 12, 2011, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Padlock
Acquisition Corp., a California corporation and our wholly-owned
subsidiary (Merger Sub), Cryptography Research,
Inc., a California corporation (CRI), and the
shareholder representative party thereto. Pursuant to the terms
of the Merger Agreement, on June 3, 2011, Merger Sub merged
with and into CRI, with CRI as the surviving corporation and our
wholly owned subsidiary.
In the transaction we paid consideration consisting of
$167,500,000 cash and approximately 6.4 million shares of
our common stock (which was determined to be equal to
$125,000,000 divided by the average closing sales price per
share of our common stock over the 15 business days prior to
May 12, 2011). In addition, we have agreed to pay
$50,000,000 to CRI employees in cash or our common stock, at our
option, over three years following June 3, 2011 (the
Retention Bonus). A portion of the transaction
consideration consisting of (i) $15,000,000 cash, and
(ii) approximately 1.3 million shares of our common
stock (determined to be equal to $25,000,000 divided by the
average closing sales price per share of our common stock over
the 15 business days prior to May 12, 2011), will be placed
in escrow until December 2012, subject to any claims, to fund
any indemnification obligations to us following the consummation
of the merger.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Retention Bonus will be
paid to certain CRI employees and contractors that have joined
us following consummation of the merger, subject to certain
eligibility and acceleration provisions, in amounts equal to
$16,666,666 from the $50,000,000 retention bonus pool on each of
June 3, 2012, June 3, 2013 and June 3, 2014. The
first retention bonus payment will be made in cash and the
following two payments will be made in either cash or shares of
our common stock, at our option.
The foregoing is a summary of the material provisions of the
Merger Agreement. This summary is not intended to be complete
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger
Agreement, which we will file with the SEC as an exhibit to our
quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2011. Our stockholders are not
third-party beneficiaries under the Merger Agreement and should
not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any
descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of
facts or condition of Rambus, CRI or any of their respective
subsidiaries.
On May 13, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued its opinions in the
cases with Hynix Semiconductor and Micron Technology Inc. In the
Micron case, the CAFC affirmed the district courts
determination that Rambus spoliated documents, but vacated the
courts dismissal sanction (including the district
courts determination of bad faith and prejudice) and
remanded the case for further consideration by the
U.S. District Court for Delaware. In the Hynix case, the
CAFC vacated the spoliation findings of the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California that Rambus had
not spoliated documents. The CAFC vacated the district
courts final judgment and remanded the case to the
district court for further proceedings consistent with the
CFACs opinions in the Micron and Hynix cases. The CAFC
affirmed the district courts decisions in Rambus
favor on the patent and conduct trial issues and affirmed the
district courts decisions in Hynixs favor on the
claims at issue in Rambus cross-appeal.
On June 2, 2011, Rambus signed a patent license agreement
with Freescale Semiconductor. The agreement covers the use of
Rambus patented innovations for memory controllers and serial
links in a broad range of logic integrated circuit (IC) products
offered by Freescale. In addition, the two companies have agreed
to settle all claims between them including resolution of past
use of Rambus patented innovations.
2
The
Shares Offered in this Prospectus
|
|
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
6,380,806 shares |
|
Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol |
|
RMBS |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
All of the shares of common stock being offered under this
prospectus are being sold by the selling stockholders.
Accordingly, we will not receive any proceeds from the sale of
these shares. |
3
RISK
FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below,
together with all of the other information included in or
incorporated by reference into this prospectus, before making an
investment decision. Because of the following factors, as well
as other variables affecting our operating results, past
financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future
performance, and historical trends should not be used to
anticipate results or trends in future periods. See also
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Risks
Associated With Our Business, Industry and Market
Conditions
If
market leaders do not adopt our innovations, our results of
operations could decline.
An important part of our strategy is to penetrate our target
market segments by working with leaders in those market
segments. This strategy is designed to encourage other
participants in those segments to follow such leaders in
adopting our innovations. If a high profile industry participant
adopts our innovations but fails to achieve success with its
products or adopts and achieves success with a competing
technology, our reputation and sales could be adversely
affected. For example, if our commercial relationships with
Samsung do not achieve success, our reputation could be
adversely affected given the market position of Samsung as a
leading memory manufacturer. In addition, some industry
participants have adopted, and others may in the future adopt, a
strategy of disparaging our memory solutions adopted by their
competitors or a strategy of otherwise undermining the market
adoption of our solutions.
We target system companies to adopt our chip interface
technologies, particularly those that develop and market high
volume business and consumer products, which were traditionally
focused on PCs, including PC graphics processors, and video game
consoles, and now include HDTVs, cellular and digital phones,
personal digital assistants (PDAs), digital cameras
and other consumer electronics that incorporate all varieties of
memory and chip interfaces. In particular, our strategy includes
gaining acceptance of our technology in high volume consumer
applications, including video game consoles, such as the Sony
PlayStation®3,
HDTVs and set top boxes. As we diversify our technologies, such
as through the establishment of our LDT group, we will seek out
other target markets in and related to computing, gaming and
graphics, consumer electronics, mobile and general lighting
applications. We are subject to many risks beyond our control
that influence whether or not a potential licensee or partner
company will adopt our technologies, including, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
competition faced by a company in its particular industry;
|
|
|
|
the timely introduction and market acceptance of a
companys products;
|
|
|
|
the engineering, sales and marketing and management capabilities
of a company;
|
|
|
|
technical challenges unrelated to our innovations faced by a
company in developing its products;
|
|
|
|
the financial and other resources of a company;
|
|
|
|
the supply of semiconductors from our memory and chip interface
licensees in sufficient quantities and at commercially
attractive prices;
|
|
|
|
the ability to establish the prices at which the chips
containing our chip interfaces are made available to system
companies; and
|
|
|
|
the degree to which our licensees promote our innovations to
their customers.
|
There can be no assurance that consumer products that currently
use our technology will continue to do so, nor can there be any
assurance that the consumer products that incorporate our
technology will be successful in their markets in order to
generate expected royalties, nor can there be any assurance that
any of our technologies selected for licensing will be
implemented in a commercially developed or distributed product.
If any of these events occur and market leaders do not
successfully adopt our technologies, our strategy may not be
successful and, as a result, our results of operations could
decline.
4
We
have traditionally operated in an industry that is highly
cyclical and in which the number of our potential customers may
be in decline as a result of industry consolidation, and we face
intense competition in all of our target markets that may cause
our results of operations to suffer.
The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and has been
impacted by price erosion, rapid technological change, short
product life cycles, cyclical market patterns and increasing
foreign and domestic competition. As the semiconductor industry
is highly cyclical, significant economic downturns characterized
by diminished demand, erosion of average selling prices,
production overcapacity and production capacity constraints
could affect the semiconductor industry. We have just emerged
from such a period of economic downturn. As a result, we may
achieve a reduced number of licenses, tightening of
customers operating budgets, difficulty or inability of
our customers to pay our licensing fees, extensions of the
approval process for new licenses and consolidation among our
customers, all of which may adversely affect the demand for our
technology and may cause us to experience substantial
period-to-period
fluctuations in our operating results.
Many of our customers operate in industries that have
experienced significant declines as a result of the recent
economic downturn. In particular, DRAM manufacturers, which make
up a majority of our existing and potential licensees, have
suffered material losses and other adverse effects to their
businesses. These factors may result in industry consolidation
as companies seek to reduce costs and improve profitability
through business combinations. Consolidation among our existing
DRAM and other customers may result in loss of revenues under
existing license agreements. Consolidation among companies in
the DRAM and other industries within which we license our
technology may reduce the number of future licensees for our
products and services. In either case, consolidation in the DRAM
and other industries in which we operate may negatively impact
our short-term and long-term business prospects, licensing
revenues and results of operations.
We face competition from semiconductor and intellectual property
companies who provide their own DDR memory chip interface
technology and solutions. In addition, most DRAM manufacturers,
including our XDRtm licensees, produce versions of DRAM such as
SDR, DDRx, GDDRx SDRAM and LPDDRx which compete with XDRtm
chips. We believe that our principal competition for memory chip
interfaces may come from our licensees and prospective
licensees, some of which are evaluating and developing products
based on technologies that they contend or may contend will not
require a license from us. In addition, our competitors are also
taking a system approach similar to ours in seeking to solve the
application needs of system companies. Many of these companies
are larger and may have better access to financial, technical
and other resources than we possess. Wider applications of other
developing memory technologies, including FLASH memory, may also
pose competition to our licensed memory solutions.
JEDEC has standardized what it calls extensions of DDR, known as
DDR2 and DDR3. Other efforts are underway to create other
products including those sometimes referred to as GDDR4 and
GDDR5, as well as new ways to integrate products such as
system-in-package
DRAM. To the extent that these alternatives might provide
comparable system performance at lower or similar cost than
XDRtm memory chips, or are perceived to require the payment of
no or lower royalties, or to the extent other factors influence
the industry, our licensees and prospective licensees may adopt
and promote alternative technologies. Even to the extent we
determine that such alternative technologies infringe our
patents, there can be no assurance that we would be able to
negotiate agreements that would result in royalties being paid
to us without litigation, which could be costly and the results
of which would be uncertain.
The display industry is intensely competitive and is impacted by
rapid technological change, shifting government mandates,
cyclical market patterns and increasing foreign and domestic
competition. In particular, our LDT group faces competition from
system and subsystem providers of backlighting and general
lighting solutions, some of which have substantial resources and
operations.
If for any of these reasons we cannot effectively compete in
these primary market segments, our results of operations could
suffer.
5
If our
NBG does not succeed, our results of operations may be adversely
affected.
The future success of our NBG, which includes our LDT group,
depends on our ability to develop new or emerging licensing
opportunities, diversify our business into lighting and
displays, mobile communications and additional semiconductor
technologies, and, specifically for our LDT group, improve the
visual capabilities, form factor, power efficiency and
cost-effectiveness of backlighting of LCD displays in products
for computing, gaming and graphics, consumer electronics, mobile
and general lighting applications.
We will need to keep pace with rapid changes in advanced
lighting and optoelectronics technology, changing consumer
requirements, new product introductions and evolving industry
standards, any of which could render our existing technology
obsolete if we fail to respond in a timely manner. The extent to
which companies in the general lighting industry adopt solid
state lighting and license our lighting technologies, and the
timing of such adoption and licensing, if it occurs at all, is
subject to many factors beyond our control and is not
predictable by us. We are subject to many risks beyond our
control that influence whether or not a potential licensee or
partner company will adopt and license our lighting technologies.
The development, application and licensing of new backlit
lighting technologies is a complex process subject to a number
of uncertainties, including the integration of our LDT group
into the rest of our company and the limited resources of the
LDT group. Our competitors have significant marketing,
workforce, financial and other resources and longer operating
history which could make acceptance of our lighting technologies
more difficult. If others develop innovative proprietary
lighting technology that is superior to ours or if we fail to
accurately anticipate technology and market trends, respond on a
timely basis with our own new enhancements and technology, and
achieve broad market acceptance of these enhancements and
technology, our competitive position may be harmed and our
operating results may be adversely affected.
In
order to grow, we may have to invest more resources in research
and development than anticipated, which could increase our
operating expenses and negatively impact our operating
results.
If new competitors, technological advances by existing
competitors, our entry into new markets,
and/or
development of new technologies or other competitive factors
require us to invest significantly greater resources than
anticipated in our research and development efforts, our
operating expenses would increase. For the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, research and development expenses
were $23.3 million and $21.7 million, respectively,
including stock-compensation of approximately $2.5 million
and $2.6 million, respectively. If we are required to
invest significantly greater resources than anticipated in
research and development efforts without an increase in revenue,
especially with respect to our LDT group and any other new
technologies that we pursue outside of our core memory and chip
interface technologies, our operating results could decline.
Research and development expenses are likely to fluctuate from
time to time to the extent we make periodic incremental
investments in research and development, including as a result
of our investment in new technologies, and these investments may
be independent of our level of revenue. In order to grow, which
may include entering new markets
and/or
developing new technologies, we anticipate that we will continue
to devote substantial resources to research and development. We
expect these expenses to increase in absolute dollars in the
foreseeable future due to the increased complexity and the
greater number of products under development as well as
selectively hiring additional employees.
Our
revenue is concentrated in a few customers, and if we lose any
of these customers, our revenue may decrease
substantially.
We have a high degree of revenue concentration. As a result of
our settlement with Samsung, Samsung accounted for a significant
portion of our ongoing licensing revenue since 2010. Our top
five licensees represented approximately 74% and 94% of our
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively. For the three months ended March 31,
2011, revenues from Elpida, NVIDIA, Samsung and Toshiba each
accounted for 10% or more of our total revenue. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, revenue from Samsung accounted
for 10% or more of our total revenue. We expect to continue to
experience significant revenue concentration for the foreseeable
future.
6
In addition, some of our commercial agreements require us to
provide certain customers with the lowest royalty rate that we
provide to other customers for similar technologies, volumes and
schedules. These clauses may limit our ability to effectively
price differently among our customers, to respond quickly to
market forces, or otherwise to compete on the basis of price.
The particular licensees which account for revenue concentration
have varied from period to period as a result of the addition of
new contracts, expiration of existing contracts, renewal of
existing contracts, industry consolidation, including the
combination in 2010 of NEC and Renesas, the expiration of
deferred revenue schedules under existing contracts, and the
volumes and prices at which the licensees have recently sold
licensed semiconductors to system companies. These variations
are expected to continue in the foreseeable future, although we
anticipate that revenue will continue to be concentrated in a
limited number of licensees.
We are in negotiations with licensees and prospective licensees
to reach patent license agreements for DRAM devices and DRAM
controllers. We expect that patent license royalties will
continue to vary from period to period based on our success in
renewing existing license agreements and adding new licensees,
as well as the level of variation in our licensees
reported shipment volumes, sales price and mix, offset in part
by the proportion of licensee payments that are fixed. However,
we cannot provide any assurance that we will reach agreement on
renewal terms or that the royalty rates we will be entitled to
receive under the new agreements will be as favorable to us as
our current agreements. If we are unsuccessful in renewing any
of these patent license agreements, our results of operations
may decline significantly.
If we
cannot respond to rapid technological change in our target
markets by developing new innovations in a timely and
cost-effective manner, our operating results will
suffer.
We derive most of our revenue from our chip interface
technologies that we have patented. We expect that this
dependence on our fundamental technology will continue for the
foreseeable future. The semiconductor industry is characterized
by rapid technological change, with new generations of
semiconductors being introduced periodically and with ongoing
improvements. The introduction or market acceptance of competing
chip interfaces that render our chip interfaces less desirable
or obsolete would have a rapid and material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition. The
announcement of new chip interfaces by us could cause licensees
or system companies to delay or defer entering into arrangements
for the use of our current chip interfaces, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. We are dependent on the semiconductor
industry to develop test solutions that are adequate to test our
chip interfaces and to supply such test solutions to our
customers and us.
Our continued success depends on our ability to introduce and
patent enhancements and new generations of our chip interface
technologies that keep pace with other changes in the
semiconductor industry and which achieve rapid market
acceptance. We must continually devote significant engineering
resources to addressing the ever increasing need for higher
speed chip interfaces associated with increases in the speed of
microprocessors and other controllers. The technical innovations
that are required for us to be successful are inherently complex
and require long development cycles, and there can be no
assurance that our development efforts will ultimately be
successful. In addition, these innovations must be:
|
|
|
|
|
completed before changes in the semiconductor industry render
them obsolete;
|
|
|
|
available when system companies require these
innovations; and
|
|
|
|
sufficiently compelling to cause semiconductor manufacturers to
enter into licensing arrangements with us for these new
technologies.
|
Significant technological innovations generally require a
substantial investment before their commercial viability can be
determined, and this concept applies to all of our target
markets. There can be no assurance that we have accurately
estimated the amount of resources required to complete our
innovation efforts, or that we will have, or be able to expend,
sufficient resources required for the development of our
innovations. In addition, there is market risk associated with
these products for which we develop technological innovations,
and there can be no assurance that unit volumes, and their
associated royalties, will occur. If our technology fails to
capture or maintain a portion of the high volume target consumer
market, our business results could suffer.
7
We
have in the past and may in the future make acquisitions or
enter into mergers, strategic transactions or other arrangements
that could cause our business to suffer.
As part of our strategic initiatives, we currently are
evaluating, and expect to continue to engage in, investments in
or acquisitions of companies, products, patents or technologies,
and the entry into strategic transactions or other arrangements.
We completed a number of acquisitions in 2009, 2010 and 2011,
including, most recently the acquisition of Cryptography
Research, Inc. These acquisitions, investments, transactions or
arrangements are likely to range in size, some of which may be
significant. After completing our acquisitions, we may
experience difficulty integrating that companys or
divisions personnel and operations, which could negatively
affect our operating results. In addition:
|
|
|
|
|
the key personnel of the acquired entity or business may decide
not to work for us or may not perform according to our
expectations;
|
|
|
|
we may experience additional legal, financial and accounting
challenges and complexities in areas such as licensing, tax
planning, cash management and financial reporting;
|
|
|
|
our ongoing business, including our operations, technology
development and deliveries to our customers, may be disrupted or
receive insufficient management attention, and employee
retention and productivity could also suffer;
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to recognize the financial benefits we
anticipated
and/or we
may suffer losses, both with respect to our ongoing business and
the acquired entity or business;
|
|
|
|
our increasing international presence resulting from
acquisitions may increase our exposure to international
currency, tax and political risks; and
|
|
|
|
our lack of experience in new markets, products or technologies
may cause us to fail to recognize the forecasted financial and
strategic benefits of the acquisition.
|
In connection with our strategic initiatives related to future
acquisitions or mergers, strategic transactions or other
arrangements, we may incur substantial expenses regardless of
whether any transactions occur. Further, the risks described
above may be exacerbated as a result of managing multiple
acquisitions simultaneously.
In addition, we may be required to assume the liabilities of the
companies or related to the businesses we acquire. The
assumption of such liabilities may include those related to
intellectual property infringement or indemnification of
customers of acquired businesses for similar claims, which could
materially and adversely affect our business.
We may have to incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for
any future acquisition, the issuance of which could involve
restrictive covenants or be dilutive to our existing
stockholders.
Some
of our revenue is subject to the pricing policies of our
licensees over whom we have no control.
We have no control over our licensees pricing of their
products and there can be no assurance that licensee products
using or containing our chip interfaces will be competitively
priced or will sell in significant volumes. One important
requirement for our memory chip interfaces is for any premium
charged by our licensees in the price of memory and controller
chips over alternatives to be reasonable in comparison to the
perceived benefits of the chip interfaces. If the benefits of
our technology do not match the price premium charged by our
licensees, the resulting decline in sales of products
incorporating our technology could harm our operating results.
Our
licensing cycle is lengthy and costly and our marketing and
licensing efforts may be unsuccessful.
The process of persuading customers to adopt and license our
chip interface and other technologies can be lengthy and, even
if successful, there can be no assurance that our technologies
will be used in a product that is ultimately brought to market,
achieves commercial acceptance, or results in significant
royalties to us. We generally incur significant marketing and
sales expenses prior to entering into our license agreements,
generating a license fee and establishing a royalty stream from
each licensee. The length of time it takes to establish a new
licensing relationship can take many months or even years. In
addition, our ongoing intellectual property litigation and
8
regulatory actions have and will likely continue to have an
impact on our ability to enter into new licenses and renewals of
licenses. As such, we may incur costs in any particular period
before any associated revenue stream begins, if at all. If our
marketing and sales efforts are very lengthy or unsuccessful,
then we may face a material adverse effect on our business and
results of operations as a result of delay or failure to obtain
royalties.
Future
revenue is difficult to predict for several reasons, and our
failure to predict revenue accurately may cause us to miss
analysts estimates and result in our stock price
declining.
Our lengthy and costly license negotiation cycle and our ongoing
intellectual property litigation make our future revenue
difficult to predict because we may not be successful in
entering into licenses with our customers on our estimated
timelines and we are reliant on the litigation timelines for any
results or settlements, such as our January 2010 settlement with
Samsung.
While some of our license agreements provide for fixed,
quarterly royalty payments, many of our license agreements
provide for volume-based royalties, and may also be subject to
caps on royalties in a given period. The sales volume and prices
of our licensees products in any given period can be
difficult to predict. As a result, our actual results may differ
substantially from analyst estimates or our forecasts in any
given quarter.
In addition, a portion of our revenue comes from development and
support services provided to our licensees. Depending upon the
nature of the services, a portion of the related revenue may be
recognized ratably over the support period, or may be recognized
according to contract accounting. Contract revenue accounting
may result in deferral of the service fees to the completion of
the contract, or may be recognized over the period in which
services are performed on a
percentage-of-completion
basis. There can be no assurance that the product development
schedule for these projects will not be changed or delayed. All
of these factors make it difficult to predict future licensing
revenue and may result in our missing previously announced
earnings guidance or analysts estimates which would likely
cause our stock price to decline.
Our
quarterly and annual operating results are unpredictable and
fluctuate, which may cause our stock price to be volatile and
decline.
Since many of our revenue components fluctuate and are difficult
to predict, and our expenses are largely independent of revenue
in any particular period, it is difficult for us to accurately
forecast revenue and profitability. Factors other than those set
forth above, which are beyond our ability to control or assess
in advance, that could cause our operating results to fluctuate
include:
|
|
|
|
|
semiconductor and system companies acceptance of our chip
interface products;
|
|
|
|
the success of high volume consumer applications;
|
|
|
|
the dependence of our royalties upon fluctuating sales volumes
and prices of licensed chips that include our technology;
|
|
|
|
the seasonal shipment patterns of systems incorporating our chip
interface products;
|
|
|
|
the loss of any strategic relationships with system companies or
licensees;
|
|
|
|
semiconductor or system companies discontinuing major products
incorporating our chip interfaces;
|
|
|
|
the unpredictability of litigation results or settlements and
the timing and amount of any litigation expenses;
|
|
|
|
changes in our customers development schedules and levels
of expenditure on research and development;
|
|
|
|
our licensees terminating or failing to make payments under
their current contracts or seeking to modify such contracts,
whether voluntarily or as a result of financial difficulties;
|
|
|
|
the results of our efforts to expand into new target markets,
such as with our LDT group;
|
|
|
|
changes in our strategies, including changes in our licensing
focus and/or
acquisitions of companies with business models or target markets
different from our own; and
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the economy and credit market and their effects upon
demand for our technology and the products of our licensees.
|
We believe that royalties will continue to represent a majority
of total revenue for the foreseeable future. For the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, royalties accounted
for 95% and 99%, respectively, of our total revenue. Royalties
are generally recognized in the quarter in which we receive a
report from a licensee regarding the sale of licensed chips in
the prior quarter; however, royalties are recognized only if
collectability is assured. As a result of these uncertainties
and effects being outside of our control, royalty revenue is
difficult to predict and makes it difficult to develop accurate
financial forecasts, which could cause our stock price to become
volatile and decline.
A
substantial portion of our revenue is derived from sources
outside of the United States and this revenue and our business
generally are subject to risks related to international
operations that are often beyond our control.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, revenue
received from our international customers constituted
approximately 78% and 97% of our total revenue, respectively. As
a result of our continued focus on international markets, we
expect that future revenue derived from international sources
will continue to represent a significant portion of our total
revenue.
To date, all of the revenue from international licensees has
been denominated in U.S. dollars. However, to the extent
that such licensees sales to systems companies are not
denominated in U.S. dollars, any royalties which are based
as a percentage of the customers sales that we receive as
a result of such sales could be subject to fluctuations in
currency exchange rates. In addition, if the effective price of
licensed semiconductors sold by our foreign licensees were to
increase as a result of fluctuations in the exchange rate of the
relevant currencies, demand for licensed semiconductors could
fall, which in turn would reduce our royalties. We do not use
financial instruments to hedge foreign exchange rate risk.
We currently have international design operations in India and
business development operations in Japan, Korea, Taiwan and
Germany. Our international operations and revenue are subject to
a variety of risks which are beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
export controls, tariffs, import and licensing restrictions and
other trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
profits, if any, earned abroad being subject to local tax laws
and not being repatriated to the United States or, if
repatriation is possible, limited in amount;
|
|
|
|
treatment of revenue from international sources and changes to
tax codes, including being subject to foreign tax laws and being
liable for paying withholding, income or other taxes in foreign
jurisdictions, such as withholding taxes in Korea;
|
|
|
|
foreign government regulations and changes in these regulations;
|
|
|
|
social, political and economic instability;
|
|
|
|
lack of protection of our intellectual property and other
contract rights by jurisdictions in which we may do business to
the same extent as the laws of the United States;
|
|
|
|
changes in diplomatic and trade relationships;
|
|
|
|
cultural differences in the conduct of business both with
licensees and in conducting business in our international
facilities and international sales offices;
|
|
|
|
operating centers outside the United States;
|
|
|
|
hiring, maintaining and managing a workforce remotely and under
various legal systems; and
|
|
|
|
geo-political issues.
|
We and our licensees are subject to many of the risks described
above with respect to companies which are located in different
countries, particularly home video game console, PC and other
consumer electronics manufacturers located in Asia and
elsewhere. There can be no assurance that one or more of the
risks associated with our
10
international operations could not result in a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Weak
global economic conditions may adversely affect demand for the
products and services of our licensees.
Our operations and performance depend significantly on worldwide
economic conditions, and the U.S. and world economies are
emerging from a prolonged period of weak economic conditions.
Uncertainty about global economic conditions poses a risk as
consumers and businesses may postpone spending in response to
tighter credit, negative financial news and declines in income
or asset values, which could have a material negative effect on
the demand for the products of our licensees in the foreseeable
future. Other factors that could influence demand include
continuing increases in fuel and energy costs, competitive
pressures, including pricing pressures, from companies that have
competing products, changes in the credit market, conditions in
the residential real estate and mortgage markets, consumer
confidence, and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer
spending behavior. If our licensees experience reduced demand
for their products as a result of economic conditions or
otherwise, our business and results of operations could be
harmed.
If our
counterparties are unable to fulfill their financial and other
obligations to us, our business and results of operations may be
affected adversely.
Any downturn in economic conditions or other business factors
could threaten the financial health of our counterparties,
including companies with whom we have entered into licensing
arrangements, settlement agreements, or that have been subject
to litigation judgments that provide for payments to us, and
their ability to fulfill their financial and other obligations
to us. Such financial pressures on our counterparties may
eventually lead to bankruptcy proceedings or other attempts to
avoid financial obligations that are due to us under licenses,
settlement agreements or litigation judgments. Because
bankruptcy courts have the power to modify or cancel contracts
of the petitioner which remain subject to future performance and
alter or discharge payment obligations related to pre-petition
debts, we may receive less than all of the payments that we
would otherwise be entitled to receive from any such
counterparty as a result of a bankruptcy proceedings. For
example, in 2009, two of our counterparties, Qimonda and
Spansion, were subject to insolvency proceedings in their
applicable jurisdictions as a result of a downturn in business
which led to lower than anticipated or no payment to us. If we
are unable to collect all of such payments owed to us, or if
other of our counterparties enter into bankruptcy or otherwise
seek to renegotiate their financial obligations to us as a
result of the deterioration of their financial health, our
business and results of operations may be affected adversely.
If we
are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, our
business and operations could suffer.
Our success is dependent upon our ability to identify, attract,
compensate, motivate and retain qualified personnel, especially
engineers, who can enhance our existing technologies and
introduce new technologies. Competition for qualified personnel,
particularly those with significant industry experience, is
intense, in particular in the San Francisco Bay Area where
we are headquartered and in the area of Bangalore, India where
we have a design center. We are also dependent upon our senior
management personnel. The loss of the services of any of our
senior management personnel, or key sales personnel in critical
markets, or critical members of staff, or of a significant
number of our engineers could be disruptive to our development
efforts or business relationships and could cause our business
and operations to suffer.
The
recent natural disaster in Japan could disrupt our operations
and those of our customers and adversely affect our results of
operations.
A number of our licensees have headquarters
and/or
manufacturing facilities in Japan, depend on other Japanese
suppliers for materials
and/or
depend on the Japanese market for ongoing product demand. Some
of our licensees may also have closed or limited
operations resulting from the recent earthquake and tsunami in
Japan and may be affected by the consequences of the natural
disaster that has affected Japan, which have included rolling
blackouts, decreased access to raw materials, limited ability to
ship inventory and the risk of nuclear contamination. If our
licensees are unable to manufacture and ship the products that
incorporate our technology or if our there is a
11
decrease in product demand in Japan, our royalty revenue may
decline as some of our licenses rely on per unit royalties.
Our
operations are subject to risks of natural disasters, acts of
war, terrorism or widespread illness at our domestic and
international locations, any one of which could result in a
business stoppage and negatively affect our operating
results.
Our business operations depend on our ability to maintain and
protect our facility, computer systems and personnel, which are
primarily located in the San Francisco Bay Area. The
San Francisco Bay Area is in close proximity to known
earthquake fault zones. Our facility and transportation for our
employees are susceptible to damage from earthquakes and other
natural disasters such as fires, floods and similar events.
Should an earthquake or other catastrophes, such as fires,
floods, power loss, communication failure or similar events
disable our facilities, we do not have readily available
alternative facilities from which we could conduct our business,
which stoppage could have a negative effect on our operating
results. Acts of terrorism, widespread illness and war could
also have a negative effect at our international and domestic
facilities.
Our
business and operating results may be harmed if we undertake any
restructuring activities or if we are unable to manage growth in
our business.
From time to time, we may undertake to restructure our business.
There are several factors that could cause a restructuring to
have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. These include potential disruption of our
operations, the development of our technology, the deliveries to
our customers and other aspects of our business. Employee morale
and productivity could also suffer and we may lose employees
whom we want to keep. Loss of sales, service and engineering
talent, in particular, could damage our business. Any
restructuring would require substantial management time and
attention and may divert management from other important work.
Employee reductions or other restructuring activities also cause
us to incur restructuring and related expenses such as severance
expenses. Moreover, we could encounter delays in executing any
restructuring plans, which could cause further disruption and
additional unanticipated expense.
Our business historically experienced periods of rapid growth
that placed significant demands on our managerial, operational
and financial resources. In the event that we return to such a
period of growth, whether through internal expansion or
acquisitions of other businesses or technologies, we would need
to improve and expand our management, operational and financial
systems and controls. We also would need to expand, train and
manage our employee base. We cannot assure you that in
connection with any such growth we will be able to timely and
effectively meet demand and maintain the quality standards
required by our existing and potential customers and licensees.
If we ineffectively manage our growth or we are unsuccessful in
recruiting and retaining personnel, our business and operating
results will be harmed.
Unanticipated
changes in our tax rates or in the tax laws and regulations
could expose us to additional income tax liabilities which could
affect our operating results and financial
condition.
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and
various foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required
in determining our worldwide provision (or benefit) for income
taxes and, in the ordinary course of business, there are many
transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain. Our effective tax rate could be
adversely affected by changes in the mix of earnings in
countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the
valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in tax
laws and regulations as well as other factors. Our tax
determinations are regularly subject to audit by tax authorities
and developments in those audits could adversely affect our
income tax provision. Although we believe that our tax estimates
are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits or tax
disputes may be different from what is reflected in our
historical income tax provisions which could affect our
operating results.
12
Our
results of operations could vary as a result of the methods,
estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting
policies.
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our
accounting policies have a significant impact on our results of
operations, including the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities, as described elsewhere in
this report. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates,
including those related to revenue recognition, investments,
income taxes, litigation, goodwill and intangibles, and other
contingencies. Such methods, estimates, and judgments are, by
their nature, subject to substantial risks, uncertainties, and
assumptions, and factors may arise over time that lead us to
change our methods, estimates, and judgments. In addition,
actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Changes in those methods, estimates, and judgments could
significantly affect our results of operations. In particular,
the measurement of share-based compensation expense requires us
to use valuation methodologies and a number of assumptions,
estimates, and conclusions regarding matters such as expected
forfeitures, expected volatility of our share price, and the
exercise behavior of our employees. Changes in these factors may
affect both our reported results (including cost of contract
revenue, research and development expenses, marketing, general
and administrative expenses and our effective tax rate) and any
forward-looking projections we make that incorporate projections
of share-based compensation expense. Furthermore, there are no
means, under applicable accounting principles, to compare and
adjust our reported expense if and when we learn about
additional information that may affect the estimates that we
previously made, with the exception of changes in expected
forfeitures of share-based awards.
Factors may arise that lead us to change our estimates and
assumptions with respect to future share-based compensation
arrangements, resulting in variability in our share-based
compensation expense over time.
Risks
Related to Corporate Governance and Capitalization
Matters
The
price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, which may
make it difficult for holders to resell their shares when
desired or at attractive prices.
Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol RMBS. The trading price of our
common stock has been subject to wide fluctuations which we
expect to continue in the future in response to, among other
things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
new litigation or developments in current litigation, including
an unfavorable outcome to us from court proceedings relating to
our ongoing litigation and reaction to any settlements that we
enter into with former litigants;
|
|
|
|
any progress, or lack of progress, real or perceived, in the
development of products that incorporate our innovations;
|
|
|
|
our signing or not signing new licensees;
|
|
|
|
announcements of our technological innovations or new products
by us, our licensees or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
positive or negative reports by securities analysts as to our
expected financial results;
|
|
|
|
developments with respect to patents or proprietary rights and
other events or factors;
|
|
|
|
trading activity related to our share repurchase plans; and
|
|
|
|
issuance of additional securities by us, such as our issuance of
approximately 9.6 million shares of common stock to Samsung
in connection with our settlement agreement in January 2010.
|
In addition, the stock market in general, and prices for
companies in our industry in particular, have experienced
extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the
operating performance of such companies. These broad market and
industry fluctuations may adversely affect the price of our
common stock, regardless of our operating performance. Because
our outstanding senior convertible notes are convertible into
shares of our common stock, volatility or depressed prices of
our common stock could have a similar effect on the trading
price of our
13
notes. In addition, the existence of the notes may encourage
short selling in our common stock by market participants because
the conversion of the notes could depress the price of our
common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our
common stock in the public market, or the perception that those
sales may occur, could cause the market price of our common
stock to decline. In addition, lack of positive performance in
our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key
employees.
We
have been party to, and may in the future be subject to,
lawsuits relating to securities law matters which may result in
unfavorable outcomes and significant judgments, settlements and
legal expenses which could cause our business, financial
condition and results of operations to suffer.
In connection with our stock option investigation, we and
certain of our current and former officers and directors, as
well as our current auditors, were subject to several
stockholder derivative actions, securities fraud class actions
and/or
individual lawsuits filed in federal court against us and
certain of our current and former officers and directors. The
complaints generally allege that the defendants violated the
federal and state securities laws and state law claims for fraud
and breach of fiduciary duty. While we have settled the
derivative and securities fraud class actions, the individual
lawsuits continue to be adjudicated. For more information about
the historic litigation described above, see Note 13,
Litigation and Asserted Claims, of Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of our
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The amount of time to
resolve these current and any future lawsuits is uncertain, and
these matters could require significant management and financial
resources which could otherwise be devoted to the operation of
our business. Although we have expensed or accrued for certain
liabilities that we believe will result from certain of these
actions, the actual costs and expenses to defend and satisfy all
of these lawsuits and any potential future litigation may exceed
our current estimated accruals, possibly significantly.
Unfavorable outcomes and significant judgments, settlements and
legal expenses in litigation related to our past and any future
securities law claims could have material adverse impacts on our
business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows
and the trading price of our common stock.
We are
leveraged financially, which could adversely affect our ability
to adjust our business to respond to competitive pressures and
to obtain sufficient funds to satisfy our future research and
development needs, to protect and enforce our intellectual
property and other needs.
We have indebtedness. In 2009, we issued $172.5 million
aggregate principal amount of our 2014 Notes. The degree to
which we are leveraged could have important consequences,
including, but not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, litigation,
general corporate or other purposes may be limited;
|
|
|
|
a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations in the
future will be dedicated to the payment of the principal of our
indebtedness as we are required to pay the principal amount of
our 2014 Notes in cash upon conversion if specified conditions
are met or when due;
|
|
|
|
if upon any conversion of our 2014 Notes we are required to
satisfy our conversion obligation with shares of our common
stock or we are required to pay a make-whole premium
with shares of our common stock, our existing stockholders
interest in us would be diluted; and
|
|
|
|
we may be more vulnerable to economic downturns, less able to
withstand competitive pressures and less flexible in responding
to changing business and economic conditions.
|
A failure to comply with the covenants and other provisions of
our debt instruments could result in events of default under
such instruments, which could permit acceleration of all of our
notes. Any required repayment of our notes as a result of a
fundamental change or other acceleration would lower our current
cash on hand such that we would not have those funds available
for use in our business.
If we are at any time unable to generate sufficient cash flows
from operations to service our indebtedness when payment is due,
we may be required to attempt to renegotiate the terms of the
instruments relating to the indebtedness, seek to refinance all
or a portion of the indebtedness or obtain additional financing.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully
renegotiate such terms, that any such refinancing would be
possible or that any additional financing could be obtained on
terms that are favorable or acceptable to us.
14
In addition, we may be required to purchase the shares of
contingently redeemable common stock for an aggregate purchase
price of up to $100.0 million that may be put back to us by
Samsung in July or August 2011, which would reduce our cash
resources.
If
securities or industry analysts change their recommendations
regarding our stock adversely, our stock price and trading
volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the
research and reports that industry or securities analysts
publish about us, our business or our market. If one or more of
the analysts who cover us change their recommendation regarding
our stock adversely, our stock price would likely decline. If
one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or
fails to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose
visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause
our stock price or trading volume to decline.
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public
disclosure may result in additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including new Securities and
Exchange Commission, regulations and NASDAQ rules, have
historically created uncertainty for companies such as ours. Any
new or changed laws, regulations and standards are subject to
varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of
specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may
evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and
governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty
regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by
ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Any
new investment of resources to comply with evolving laws,
regulations and standards, may result in increased general and
administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and
attention from revenue generating activities to compliance
activities. If our efforts to comply with new or changed laws,
regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by
regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to
practice, our reputation may be harmed and our business and
operations would suffer.
Our
restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, Delaware law
and our outstanding convertible notes contain provisions that
could discourage transactions resulting in a change in control,
which may negatively affect the market price of our common
stock.
Our restated certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and
Delaware law contain provisions that might enable our management
to discourage, delay or prevent a change in control. In
addition, these provisions could limit the price that investors
would be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common
stock. Pursuant to such provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
our board of directors is authorized, without prior stockholder
approval, to create and issue preferred stock, commonly referred
to as blank check preferred stock, with rights
senior to those of common stock, which means that a new
stockholder rights plan could be implemented by our board to
replace our old plan that has now expired;
|
|
|
|
our board of directors is staggered into two classes, only one
of which is elected at each annual meeting;
|
|
|
|
stockholder action by written consent is prohibited;
|
|
|
|
nominations for election to our board of directors and the
submission of matters to be acted upon by stockholders at a
meeting are subject to advance notice requirements;
|
|
|
|
certain provisions in our bylaws and certificate of
incorporation such as notice to stockholders, the ability to
call a stockholder meeting, advance notice requirements and
action of stockholders by written consent may only be amended
with the approval of stockholders holding
662/3%
of our outstanding voting stock;
|
|
|
|
our stockholders have no authority to call special meetings of
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
our board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or
repeal our bylaws.
|
We are also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, which provides, subject to enumerated
exceptions, that if a person acquires 15% or more of our
outstanding voting stock, the person is an
15
interested stockholder and may not engage in any
business combination with us for a period of three
years from the time the person acquired 15% or more of our
outstanding voting stock.
Certain provisions of our outstanding convertible notes could
make it more difficult or more expensive for a third party to
acquire us. Upon the occurrence of certain transactions
constituting a fundamental change, holders of the notes will
have the right, at their option, to require us to repurchase, at
a cash repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount
plus accrued and unpaid interest on the notes, all or a portion
of their notes. We may also be required to issue additional
shares of our common stock upon conversion of such notes in the
event of certain fundamental changes.
Litigation,
Regulation and Business Risks Related to our Intellectual
Property
We
face current and potential adverse determinations in litigation
stemming from our efforts to protect and enforce our patents and
intellectual property, which could broadly impact our
intellectual property rights, distract our management and cause
a substantial decline in our revenue and stock
price.
We seek to diligently protect our intellectual property rights.
In connection with the extension of our licensing program to SDR
SDRAM-compatible and DDR SDRAM-compatible products, we became
involved in litigation related to such efforts against different
parties in multiple jurisdictions. In each of these cases, we
have claimed infringement of certain of our patents, while the
manufacturers of such products have generally sought damages and
a determination that the patents in suit are invalid,
unenforceable, and not infringed. Among other things, the
opposing parties have alleged that certain of our patents are
unenforceable because we engaged in document spoliation,
litigation misconduct
and/or acted
improperly during our 1991 to 1995 participation in the JEDEC
standard setting organization (including allegations of
antitrust violations and unfair competition). We have also
become involved in litigation related to infringement of our
patents related to products having certain peripheral
interfaces. See Note 13, Litigation and Asserted
Claims, of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements of our
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
There can be no assurance that any or all of the opposing
parties will not succeed, either at the trial or appellate
level, with such claims or counterclaims against us or that they
will not in some other way establish broad defenses against our
patents, achieve conflicting results, or otherwise avoid or
delay paying royalties for the use of our patented technology.
Moreover, there is a risk that if one party prevails against us,
other parties could use the adverse result to defeat or limit
our claims against them; conversely, there can be no assurance
that if we prevail against one party, we will succeed against
other parties on similar claims, defenses, or counterclaims. In
addition, there is the risk that the pending litigations and
other circumstances may cause us to accept less than what we now
believe to be fair consideration in settlement.
Any of these matters or any future intellectual property
litigation, whether or not determined in our favor or settled by
us, is costly, may cause delays (including delays in negotiating
licenses with other actual or potential licensees), will tend to
discourage future design partners, will tend to impair adoption
of our existing technologies and divert the efforts and
attention of our management and technical personnel from other
business operations. In addition, we may be unsuccessful in our
litigation if we have difficulty obtaining the cooperation of
former employees and agents who were involved in our business
during the relevant periods related to our litigation and are
now needed to assist in cases or testify on our behalf.
Furthermore, any adverse determination or other resolution in
litigation could result in our losing certain rights beyond the
rights at issue in a particular case, including, among other
things: our being effectively barred from suing others for
violating certain or all of our intellectual property rights;
our patents being held invalid or unenforceable or not
infringed; our being subjected to significant liabilities; our
being required to seek licenses from third parties; our being
prevented from licensing our patented technology; or our being
required to renegotiate with current licensees on a temporary or
permanent basis. Even if we are successful in our litigation, or
any settlement of such litigation, there is no guarantee that
the applicable opposing parties will be able to pay any damages
awards timely or at all as a result of financial difficulties or
otherwise. Delay or any or all of these adverse results could
cause a substantial decline in our revenue and stock price.
An adverse resolution by or with a governmental agency could
result in severe limitations on our ability to protect and
license our intellectual property, and would cause our revenue
to decline substantially.
16
From
time to time, we are subject to proceedings by government
agencies, such as our Federal Trade Commission and European
Commission proceedings over the past several years. These
proceedings may result in adverse determinations against us or
in other outcomes that could limit our ability to enforce or
license our intellectual property, and could cause our revenue
to decline substantially.
In addition, third parties have and may attempt to use adverse
findings by a government agency to limit our ability to enforce
or license our patents in private litigations, to challenge or
otherwise act against us with respect to such government agency
proceedings, such as the attempts by Hynix to appeal our
settlement with the European Commission, and to assert claims
for monetary damages against us. Although we have successfully
defeated certain attempts to do so, there can be no assurance
that other third parties will not be successful in the future or
that additional claims or actions arising out of adverse
findings by a government agency will not be asserted against us.
Further, third parties have sought and may seek review and
reconsideration of the patentability of inventions claimed in
certain of our patents by the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office (PTO)
and/or the
European Patent Office (the EPO). Currently, we are
subject to several re-examination proceedings, including
proceedings initiated by Hynix, Micron and NVIDIA as a defensive
action in connection with our litigation against those
companies. An adverse decision by the PTO or EPO could
invalidate some or all of these patent claims and could also
result in additional adverse consequences affecting other
related U.S. or European patents, including in our
intellectual property litigation. If a sufficient number of such
patents are impaired, our ability to enforce or license our
intellectual property would be significantly weakened and this
could cause our revenue to decline substantially.
The pendency of any governmental agency acting as described
above may impair our ability to enforce or license our patents
or collect royalties from existing or potential licensees, as
our litigation opponents may attempt to use such proceedings to
delay or otherwise impair any pending cases and our existing or
potential licensees may await the final outcome of any
proceedings before agreeing to new licenses or pay royalties.
Litigation
or other third-party claims of intellectual property
infringement could require us to expend substantial resources
and could prevent us from developing or licensing our technology
on a cost-effective basis.
Our research and development programs are in highly competitive
fields in which numerous third parties have issued patents and
patent applications with claims closely related to the subject
matter of our programs. We have also been named in the past, and
may in the future be named, as a defendant in lawsuits claiming
that our technology infringes upon the intellectual property
rights of third parties. In the event of a third-party claim or
a successful infringement action against us, we may be required
to pay substantial damages, to stop developing and licensing our
infringing technology, to develop non-infringing technology, and
to obtain licenses, which could result in our paying substantial
royalties or our granting of cross licenses to our technologies.
Threatened or ongoing third-party claims or infringement actions
may prevent us from pursuing additional development and
licensing arrangements for some period. For example, we may
discontinue negotiations with certain customers for additional
licensing of our patents due to the uncertainty caused by our
ongoing litigation on the terms of such licenses or of the terms
of such licenses on our litigation. We may not be able to obtain
licenses from other parties at a reasonable cost, or at all,
which could cause us to expend substantial resources, or result
in delays in, or the cancellation of, new product.
If we
are unable to successfully protect our inventions through the
issuance and enforcement of patents, our operating results could
be adversely affected.
We have an active program to protect our proprietary inventions
through the filing of patents. There can be no assurance,
however, that:
|
|
|
|
|
any current or future U.S. or foreign patent applications
will be approved and not be challenged by third parties;
|
|
|
|
our issued patents will protect our intellectual property and
not be challenged by third parties;
|
|
|
|
the validity of our patents will be upheld;
|
|
|
|
our patents will not be declared unenforceable;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
the patents of others will not have an adverse effect on our
ability to do business;
|
|
|
|
Congress or the U.S. courts or foreign countries will not
change the nature or scope of rights afforded patents or patent
owners or alter in an adverse way the process for seeking
patents;
|
|
|
|
changes in law will not be implemented that will affect our
ability to protect and enforce our patents and other
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
new legal theories and strategies utilized by our competitors
will not be successful;
|
|
|
|
others will not independently develop similar or competing chip
interfaces or design around any patents that may be issued to
us; or
|
|
|
|
factors such as difficulty in obtaining cooperation from
inventors, pre-existing challenges or litigation, or license or
other contract issues will not present additional challenges in
securing protection with respect to patents and other
intellectual property that we acquire.
|
If any of the above were to occur, our operating results could
be adversely affected.
Our
inability to protect and own the intellectual property we create
would cause our business to suffer.
We rely primarily on a combination of license, development and
nondisclosure agreements, trademark, trade secret and copyright
law, and contractual provisions to protect our non-patentable
intellectual property rights. If we fail to protect these
intellectual property rights, our licensees and others may seek
to use our technology without the payment of license fees and
royalties, which could weaken our competitive position, reduce
our operating results and increase the likelihood of costly
litigation. The growth of our business depends in large part on
the use of our intellectual property in the products of third
party manufacturers, and our ability to enforce intellectual
property rights against them to obtain appropriate compensation.
In addition, effective trade secret protection may be
unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries. Although we
intend to protect our rights vigorously, if we fail to do so,
our business will suffer.
We
rely upon the accuracy of our licensees recordkeeping, and
any inaccuracies or payment disputes for amounts owed to us
under our licensing agreements may harm our results of
operations.
Many of our license agreements require our licensees to document
the manufacture and sale of products that incorporate our
technology and report this data to us on a quarterly basis.
While licenses with such terms give us the right to audit books
and records of our licensees to verify this information, audits
rarely are undertaken because they can be expensive, time
consuming, and potentially detrimental to our ongoing business
relationship with our licensees. Therefore, we typically rely on
the accuracy of the reports from licensees without independently
verifying the information in them. Our failure to audit our
licensees books and records may result in our receiving
more or less royalty revenue than we are entitled to under the
terms of our license agreements. If we conduct royalty audits in
the future, such audits may trigger disagreements over contract
terms with our licensees and such disagreements could hamper
customer relations, divert the efforts and attention of our
management from normal operations and impact our business
operations and financial condition.
Any
dispute regarding our intellectual property may require us to
indemnify certain licensees, the cost of which could severely
hamper our business operations and financial
condition.
In any potential dispute involving our patents or other
intellectual property, our licensees could also become the
target of litigation. While we generally do not indemnify our
licensees, some of our license agreements provide limited
indemnities, and some require us to provide technical support
and information to a licensee that is involved in litigation
involving use of our technology. In addition, we may agree to
indemnify others in the future. Any of these indemnification and
support obligations could result in substantial expenses. In
addition to the time and expense required for us to indemnify or
supply such support to our licensees, a licensees
development, marketing and sales of licensed semiconductors
could be severely disrupted or shut down as a result of
litigation, which in turn could severely hamper our business
operations and financial condition as a result of lower or no
royalty payments.
18
NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus, including the sections entitled
Prospectus Summary and Risk Factors,
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These
forward-looking statements include, without limitation,
predictions regarding the following aspects of our future:
|
|
|
|
|
Success in the markets of our or our licensees products;
|
|
|
|
Sources of competition;
|
|
|
|
Research and development costs and improvements in technology;
|
|
|
|
Sources, amounts and concentration of revenue, including
royalties;
|
|
|
|
Success in renewing license agreements;
|
|
|
|
Product development;
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, mergers or strategic transactions;
|
|
|
|
Pricing policies of our licensees;
|
|
|
|
Engineering, marketing and general and administration expenses;
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue;
|
|
|
|
Operating results;
|
|
|
|
International licenses and operations and the operations of our
licensees in Japan;
|
|
|
|
Issuances of our securities, which could involve restrictive
covenants or be dilutive to our existing stockholders;
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net;
|
|
|
|
Effects of changes in the economy and credit market on our
industry and business;
|
|
|
|
Deterioration of financial health of commercial counterparties
and their ability to meet their obligations to us;
|
|
|
|
Ability to identify, attract, motivate and retain qualified
personnel;
|
|
|
|
Restructuring activities;
|
|
|
|
Growth in our business;
|
|
|
|
Methods, estimates and judgments in accounting policies;
|
|
|
|
Adoption of new accounting pronouncements;
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rates;
|
|
|
|
Realization of deferred tax assets/release of deferred tax
valuation allowance;
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of our Common Stock pursuant to share repurchase
programs, contingently redeemable Common Stock which we may be
required to repurchase or other repurchases;
|
|
|
|
Trading price of our Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
Internal control environment;
|
|
|
|
Corporate governance;
|
|
|
|
Consequences of the lawsuits related to the stock option
investigation;
|
|
|
|
The level and terms of our outstanding debt;
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome and effect of current and potential future intellectual
property litigation;
|
|
|
|
Resolution of the governmental agency matters involving us;
|
|
|
|
Litigation expenses;
|
|
|
|
Protection of intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
Terms of our licenses;
|
|
|
|
Amounts owed under licensing agreements;
|
|
|
|
Indemnification and technical support obligations; and
|
|
|
|
Likelihood of paying dividends or repurchasing stock.
|
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by
the use of words such as may, future,
shall, should, expects,
plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates,
predicts, intends,
potential, continue, or the negative of
such terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking
statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating
to any of the foregoing statements.
Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including those set forth under Risk Factors. All
forward-looking statements included in this document are based
on our assessment of information available to us at this time.
We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
20
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common
stock by the selling stockholders.
21
SELLING
SECURITY HOLDERS
Up to 6,380,806 shares of common stock are being offered by
this prospectus, all of which are being offered for resale for
the account of the selling stockholders. Unless otherwise noted
below, the shares being offered were issued to the selling
stockholders pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
May 12, 2011, by and among Rambus, CRI and certain other
parties in connection with our acquisition of CRI. The selling
stockholders may from time to time offer and sell pursuant to
this prospectus any or all of the shares of our common stock
being registered.
The table below sets forth certain information known to us,
based upon written representations from the selling
stockholders, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our
shares of common stock held by the selling stockholders as of
June 3, 2011, the closing date of the acquisition of CRI,
except as described in the notes to such table. Because the
selling stockholders may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of
all, some or none of the shares of our common stock covered by
this prospectus, we cannot determine the number of such shares
that will be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of by the
selling stockholders, or the amount or percentage of shares of
our common stock that will be held by the selling stockholders
upon termination of any particular offering. See Plan of
Distribution. For purposes of the table below, we assume
that the selling stockholders will sell all their shares of
common stock covered by this prospectus. Certain shares of
common stock included in the table below are being held in
escrow until December 2012, subject to any claims, to fund any
indemnification obligations to Rambus following the consummation
of the merger.
In the table below, the percentage of shares beneficially owned
is based on 107,785,430 shares of our common stock
outstanding at March 31, 2011, determined in accordance
with
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act. Under such rule, beneficial ownership
includes any shares over which the selling stockholder has sole
or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares
that the selling stockholder has the right to acquire within
60 days of such date through the exercise of any options or
other rights. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the
selling stockholders have sole voting and investment power with
respect to all shares of the common stock shown as beneficially
owned by them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Offering(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the Offering
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Being Registered
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Name of Selling Stockholder
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
for Resale
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Paul Kocher
|
|
|
3,883,291
|
(2)
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
|
3,883,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Benjamin Jun
|
|
|
604,479
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
604,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Christopher Rodgers
|
|
|
505,395
|
(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
505,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Joshua Jaffe
|
|
|
385,758
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
385,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Carter Laren
|
|
|
153,617
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
153,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Nate Lawson
|
|
|
103,935
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
103,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Joseph Yang
|
|
|
80,405
|
(8)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
80,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Hellman Family Revocable Trust
|
|
|
55,965
|
(9)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
55,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jennifer Craft
|
|
|
55,965
|
(10)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
55,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Peter Pearson
|
|
|
43,492
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
43,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Carole Coplan
|
|
|
34,263
|
(12)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
34,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Pankaj Rohatgi
|
|
|
34,263
|
(12)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
34,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Trevor Perrin
|
|
|
32,360
|
(13)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
32,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Christopher Gori
|
|
|
28,552
|
(14)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
28,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas A. Berson and
Dorothy A. Berson Living Trust
U/A Dtd 5/24/1983
|
|
|
27,982
|
(15)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
27,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dan Boneh
|
|
|
27,982
|
(16)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
27,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Neumann Trust
|
|
|
27,982
|
(17)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
27,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mark Marson
|
|
|
22,842
|
(18)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
22,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Offering(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the Offering
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Being Registered
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Name of Selling Stockholder
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
for Resale
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Benjamin Levine
|
|
|
22,842
|
(18)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
22,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Luke Teyssier
|
|
|
19,987
|
(19)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
19,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Bruce Schneier
|
|
|
19,987
|
(19)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
19,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mark Schmick
|
|
|
17,417
|
(20)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
17,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John-Mark Gurney
|
|
|
17,131
|
(21)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
17,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jeremy Cooper
|
|
|
17,131
|
(21)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
17,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Stephanie Silva Engle
|
|
|
15,989
|
(22)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
15,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gilbert Goodwill
|
|
|
14,276
|
(23)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
14,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Joseph Inkenbrandt
|
|
|
14,276
|
(23)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
14,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Tory Kallman
|
|
|
11,421
|
(24)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
11,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas Novak
|
|
|
11,421
|
(24)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
11,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Daniel Beitel
|
|
|
11,421
|
(24)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
11,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Andrew Lieserson
|
|
|
11,421
|
(24)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
11,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Cynthia Yu
|
|
|
10,992
|
(25)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
10,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Yonnie Watkins
|
|
|
9,993
|
(26)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
9,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ambuj Kumar
|
|
|
9,993
|
(26)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
9,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Joseph Boyle
|
|
|
8,565
|
(27)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Daniel Ip
|
|
|
8,565
|
(27)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Renita Attardi
|
|
|
5,710
|
(28)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Elise Acosta
|
|
|
5,710
|
(28)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Hannah Kirk
|
|
|
5,710
|
(28)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Joseph Bonneau
|
|
|
2,283
|
(29)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
TOTALS:
|
|
|
6,380,769
|
(30)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,380,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
The number of shares beneficially owned is determined in
accordance with
Rule 13d-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information is
not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other
purpose. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 776,658 shares held in escrow. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 120,896 shares held in escrow. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 101,079 shares held in escrow. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 77,151 shares held in escrow. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 30,723 shares held in escrow. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 20,787 shares held in escrow. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 16,081 shares held in escrow. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 11,193 shares held in escrow. Martin Hellman and
Dorothie Hellman share voting and dispositive power as trustees
of the trust. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 11,193 shares held in escrow. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes 8,698 shares held in escrow. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 6,852 shares held in escrow. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes 6,472 shares held in escrow. |
|
(14) |
|
Includes 5,710 shares held in escrow. |
23
|
|
|
(15) |
|
Includes 5,596 shares held in escrow. Thomas Berson and
Dorothy Berson share voting and dispositive power as trustees of
the trust. |
|
(16) |
|
Includes 5,596 shares held in escrow. |
|
(17) |
|
Includes 5,596 shares held in escrow. Peter Neumann and
Elizabeth Neumann share voting and dispositive power as trustees
of the trust. |
|
(18) |
|
Includes 4,568 shares held in escrow. |
|
(19) |
|
Includes 3,997 shares held in escrow. |
|
(20) |
|
Includes 3,483 shares held in escrow. |
|
(21) |
|
Includes 3,426 shares held in escrow. |
|
(22) |
|
Includes 3,198 shares held in escrow. |
|
(23) |
|
Includes 2,855 shares held in escrow. |
|
(24) |
|
Includes 2,284 shares held in escrow. |
|
(25) |
|
Includes 2,198 shares held in escrow. |
|
(26) |
|
Includes 1,998 shares held in escrow. |
|
(27) |
|
Includes 1,713 shares held in escrow. |
|
(28) |
|
Includes 1,142 shares held in escrow. |
|
(29) |
|
Includes 456 shares held in escrow. |
|
(30) |
|
Amount reflects the cashing out of fractional shares and
rounding of shares held in escrow. |
24
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
The selling stockholders may, from time to time, sell any or all
of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by them and
offered hereby.
The sales may be made on one or more exchanges or in the
over-the-counter
market or otherwise, at prices and at terms then prevailing or
at prices related to the then current market price, or in
negotiated transactions.
The selling stockholders may undertake such transactions by
selling the shares of common stock to or through broker-dealers.
The shares of common stock may be sold through broker-dealers by
one or more of, or a combination of, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a block trade in which the broker-dealer so engaged will attempt
to sell the shares of common stock as agent but may position and
resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the
transaction;
|
|
|
|
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by such
broker-dealer for its account;
|
|
|
|
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the
broker solicits purchasers; and
|
|
|
|
in privately negotiated transactions.
|
Any shares of common stock that qualify for sale pursuant to
Rule 144 may be sold under Rule 144 rather than
pursuant to the Registration Statement.
The selling stockholders also may transfer the shares of common
stock in other circumstances, in which case the transferees or
other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial
owners for purposes of this prospectus.
The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that
are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be
underwriters within the meaning of the Securities
Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any
commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any
profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be
deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the
Securities Act.
The selling stockholders have informed us that none of them has
any agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any
person to distribute the common stock. If any selling
stockholder notifies us that an arrangement has been entered
into with a broker-dealer for the sale of shares through a block
trade, special offering or secondary distribution or a purchase
by a broker or dealer, we may be required to file a prospectus
supplement pursuant to the applicable rules promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933.
There can be no assurance that any selling stockholder will sell
any or all of the shares of common stock registered pursuant to
the shelf registration statement, of which this prospectus forms
a part.
We are required to pay all fees and expenses incident to the
registration of the shares. We have agreed to indemnify the
selling stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or
the selling stockholders may be entitled to contribution. We may
be indemnified by the selling stockholders against civil
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act that
may arise from written information furnished to us by the
selling stockholders specifically for use in this prospectus.
None of the selling stockholders intends to use any means of
distributing or delivering the prospectus other than by hand or
the mails, and none of the selling stockholders intends to use
any forms of prospectus other than printed prospectuses.
Once sold under the shelf registration statement, of which this
prospectus forms a part, the shares of common stock will be
freely tradeable in the hands of persons other than our
affiliates.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus has been passed upon for Rambus by Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, Palo
Alto, California.
25
EXPERTS
The financial statements and managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
(which is included in Managements Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting) incorporated in this
prospectus by reference to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
of Rambus Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 have
been so incorporated in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any
document we file at the SECs Public Reference Room in
Washington, D.C., located at 100 F Street, N.E.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the Public Reference Room. Our SEC
filings are also available to the public over the internet from
the SECs website at www.sec.gov, or our website at
www.Rambus.com. The contents of our website are not incorporated
by reference in or otherwise a part of this prospectus.
INFORMATION
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference the
information we file with it, which means that we can disclose
important information to you by referring you to those
documents. The information incorporated by reference is an
important part of this prospectus, and information that we file
later with the SEC will automatically update and supersede this
information. We incorporate by reference the documents listed
below and any future filings made with the SEC under
Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14, or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the date of this registration
statement until the selling stockholders listed herein sell all
of the shares of our common stock registered under this
prospectus:
1. our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010;
2. our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011;
3. the information specifically incorporated by reference
into the Annual Report from our definitive proxy statement on
Schedule 14A, dated March 17, 2011;
4. our Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on May 3, 2011 and May 12,
2011; and
5. the description of our common stock, $0.001 par
value per share, contained in the Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
(file
no. 000-22339)
declared effective by the SEC on April 2, 1997, including
any amendments or reports filed for the purpose of updating that
description.
This prospectus is part of a registration statement on
Form S-3
filed with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933. This
prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in
the registration statement. You should read the registration
statement for further information about Rambus and our common
stock.
Documents incorporated by reference are available from us,
without charge, excluding all exhibits unless specifically
incorporated by reference in the documents. You may obtain
documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus by
writing to us at the following address or by calling us at the
telephone number listed below:
Investor Relations
Rambus Inc.
1050 Enterprise Way, Suite 700
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
You should rely only on the information incorporated by
reference or provided in this prospectus or any prospectus
supplement. We have not authorized anyone else to provide you
with different information. You should not assume that the
information in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement is
accurate as of any date other than the date on the front page of
those documents.
26
6,380,806 Shares
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
June 7, 2011
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
OTHER
EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
|
The Registrant will pay all reasonable expenses incident to the
registration of the shares other than any commissions and
discounts of underwriters, dealers or agents. Such expenses are
set forth in the following table. All of the amounts shown are
estimates except the SEC registration fee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount to
|
|
|
|
be paid
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
10,268
|
|
Printing fees
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
73,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
INDEMNIFICATION
OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
|
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for the
indemnification of present and former directors, officers,
employees and agents of ours and persons serving as directors,
employees or agents of another corporation or entity at our
request to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law. In addition, we enter into indemnification
agreements with each of our directors and executive officers
pursuant to which such persons are indemnified for costs and
expenses actually and reasonably incurred by such persons in
connection with a threatened, pending or completed claim arising
out of service as a director, officer, employee, trustee
and/or agent
of ours or another entity at our request. We maintain an
insurance policy insuring our directors and officers against
liability for certain acts and omissions while acting in their
official capacities.
See Exhibit Index immediately following the signature pages.
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and
price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum
aggregate offering price set forth in the Calculation of
Registration Fee table in the effective registration
statement; and
(iii) To include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement; provided, however,
that paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii) and (a)(1)(iii) of this
section do not apply if the registration statement is on
Form S-3
or
Form F-3
and the information required to be included in a post-effective
amendment by those paragraphs is contained in reports filed with
or furnished to the
II-1
Commission by the registrant pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that
are incorporated by reference in the registration statement, or
is contained in a form of prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b) that is part of the registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective
amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under
the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser:
(i) Each prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(3) shall be deemed to be part of the registration
statement as of the date the filed prospectus was deemed part of
and included in the registration statement; and
(ii) Each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule
424(b)(2), (b)(5) or (b)(7) as part of a registration statement
in reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering made
pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i), (vii) or (x) for
the purpose of providing the information required by
Section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed
to be part of and included in the registration statement as of
the earlier of the date such form of prospectus is first used
after effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of
securities in the offering described in the prospectus. As
provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer and
any person that is at that date an underwriter, such date shall
be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration
statement relating to the securities in the registration
statement to which that prospectus relates, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof. Provided, however, that no statement
made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of
the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or
deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement
or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will,
as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such
effective date, supersede or modify any statement that was made
in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the
registration statement or made in any such document immediately
prior to the effective date.
(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the
registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in
the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned
registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities
of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration
statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell
the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered
or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following
communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to
the purchaser and will be considered to offer and sell such
securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering
prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used
or referred to be the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus
relating to the offering containing material information about
the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
(b) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each filing of the registrants annual report
pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each
filing of an employee benefit plans annual report pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) that is incorporated by reference in the
II-2
registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(c) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to
directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the
registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933
and is, therefore, unenforceable. If a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities, (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding), is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933
and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, the Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds
to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3
and has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in
Sunnyvale, California, on June 7, 2011.
Rambus Inc.
Satish Rishi
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT, that each person whose
signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Harold
Hughes, Satish Rishi and Thomas R. Lavelle, and each of them, as
his or her true and lawful attorney in fact and agent with full
power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities,
to sign any and all amendments to this Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(including post effective amendments), and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorney in fact, proxy and agent full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as
fully for all intents and purposes as he or she might or could
do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney in fact, proxy and agent, or his substitute, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement on
Form S-3
has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harold
Hughes
Harold
Hughes
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Satish
Rishi
Satish
Rishi
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
|
|
June 7, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bruce
Dunlevie
Bruce
Dunlevie
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J.
Thomas Bentley
J.
Thomas Bentley
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sunlin
Chou
Sunlin
Chou
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ P.
Michael Farmwald
P.
Michael Farmwald
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Penelope
Herscher
Penelope
Herscher
|
|
Director
|
|
June 4, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark
Horowitz
Mark
Horowitz
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
Shrigley
David
Shrigley
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Abraham
D. Sofaer
Abraham
D. Sofaer
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Eric
Stang
Eric
Stang
|
|
Director
|
|
June 3, 2011
|
II-5
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
3
|
.1(1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant
filed May 29, 1997.
|
|
3
|
.1(2)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Registrant filed June 14, 2000.
|
|
3
|
.2(3)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant dated
November 13, 2007.
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation (contained in Exhibit 5.1 hereto)
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (contained on signature page hereto)
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Form 10-K
filed on December 15, 1997. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Form 10-Q
filed on May 4, 2001. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Form 10-Q
filed on August 4, 2008. |