def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.___)
Filed by the registrant þ
Filed by a party other than the registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o |
|
Preliminary proxy statement. |
|
o |
|
Confidential, for use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14A-6(e)(2)). |
|
þ |
|
Definitive proxy statement. |
|
o |
|
Definitive additional materials. |
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12. |
HAWKINS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
HAWKINS, INC.
3100 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held August 2,
2011
To our Shareholders:
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Hawkins, Inc. will be held
at the Midland Hills Country Club, 2001 Fulham Street,
Roseville, Minnesota on Tuesday, August 2, 2011, at
3:00 p.m., Central Time, for the following purposes:
1. To elect seven directors;
2. To approve the Hawkins, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan;
3. To advise in a non-binding vote to approve the
compensation of our executive officers as disclosed in the
attached proxy statement, or a
say-on-pay
vote;
4. To advise in a non-binding vote to recommend the
frequency of future
say-on-pay
votes, or a say-when-on-pay vote; and
5. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on
June 6, 2011 as the record date for determining the
shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Accordingly, only shareholders of record at the close of
business on that date will be entitled to vote. Our transfer
books will not be closed.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RICHARD G. ERSTAD, Secretary
Dated: June 22, 2011
IMPORTANT: To assure the necessary representation at the
Annual Meeting, you are urged to SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED
PROXY PROMPTLY TO SAVE THE COMPANY THE EXPENSE OF ADDITIONAL
SOLICITATION. You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to its
exercise, and returning your proxy will not affect your right to
vote in person if you attend the Annual Meeting and revoke the
proxy.
PROXY STATEMENT
HAWKINS, INC.
3100 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413
June 22, 2011
The following proxy statement is furnished in connection with
the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors to be
voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual
Meeting) to be held on Tuesday, August 2, 2011 at the
Midland Hills Country Club, 2001 Fulham Street, Roseville,
Minnesota, at 3:00 p.m., Central Time, and at any
adjournments of such meeting. Distribution of this Proxy
Statement and proxy to shareholders began on or about
June 22, 2011.
SOLICITATION
The cost of soliciting proxies and of the notices of the
meeting, including the preparation, assembly and mailing of
proxies and this Proxy Statement, will be borne by us. In
addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited
personally or by telephone, mail or electronic mail by our
directors, officers and regular employees. Furthermore,
arrangements may be made with brokers, banks and similar
organizations to send proxies and proxy materials to beneficial
owners for voting instructions. We will reimburse such
organizations for their expenses.
REVOCATION
AND VOTING OF PROXY
Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation and received in
time for the Annual Meeting will be voted in accordance with the
instructions in such proxy, unless the proxy is properly revoked
prior to the meeting. Any shareholder giving a proxy may revoke
it prior to its exercise at the meeting by (1) delivering a
written notice expressly revoking the proxy to our Secretary at
our offices, (2) signing and forwarding to us at our
offices a later dated proxy, or (3) attending the Annual
Meeting and casting his or her votes personally.
If you indicate on your proxy that you wish to abstain from
voting, and you hold your shares in street name or your broker
records abstentions, your shares will be considered present and
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Such shares will also
count toward determining whether or not a quorum is present for
the Annual Meeting. However, abstentions will not be taken into
account in determining the approval of any of the proposals and
will have the effect of casting a negative vote. If a
shareholder (including a broker) does not give authority to a
proxy to vote, or withholds authority to vote on a certain
proposal, then the shareholders shares will not be
considered present or entitled to vote on that proposal.
If you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting
instructions to your broker, your broker has authority under New
York Stock Exchange rules to vote those shares for or against
routine proposals, such as an amendment and
restatement of our articles of incorporation. Brokers cannot
vote on their customers behalf on non-routine
proposals such as the approval of an equity compensation plan or
the election of directors. These rules apply to us even though
the shares of our common stock are traded on the NASDAQ Global
Market. If a broker votes shares for which its customers have
not provided voting instructions for or against a
routine proposal, then those shares are counted for
the purpose of establishing a quorum at the Annual Meeting and
also will be counted for the purpose of determining the outcome
of routine proposals. If a broker does not receive
voting instructions as to a non-routine proposal, or chooses to
leave shares unvoted on a routine proposal, a broker
non-vote will occur and those shares will be counted for
the purpose of establishing a quorum at the Annual Meeting, but
not for determining the outcome of those proposals. Shares that
are subject to broker non-votes are considered not entitled to
vote on the particular proposal, and effectively reduce the
number of shares needed to approve that proposal.
As of the date of this proxy statement, we know of no matters
that will be presented for determination at the meeting other
than those referred to in this proxy statement. If any other
matters properly come before the
meeting calling for a vote of shareholders, proxies in the
enclosed form returned to us will be voted in accordance with
the recommendation of the Board of Directors or, in the absence
of such a recommendation, in accordance with the judgment of the
proxy holders.
OUTSTANDING
SHARES AND VOTING RIGHTS
At the close of business on June 6, 2011, the record date,
there were 10,311,235 shares of our common stock, par value
$0.05 per share, outstanding. The common stock is our only
outstanding class of capital stock. Holders of common stock are
entitled to one vote for each share held on the record date with
respect to all matters that may be brought before the meeting.
There is no cumulative voting for directors.
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the Annual Meeting, seven persons are to be elected to our
Board of Directors, each to hold office for the ensuing year and
until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Our By-laws
provide for a Board of Directors of not fewer than three nor
more than eleven directors. Our Board of Directors currently
consists of seven directors, as established by resolution of our
Board of Directors. Our By-laws provide that the nominees must
be elected by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the voting power of the shares represented at the meeting
(whether in person or by proxy). Abstentions and withhold votes
have the effect of a vote against the nominees. Executed and
delivered proxies will be voted for the election of all nominees
unless you direct otherwise. Should any nominee decline or be
unable to accept such nomination or to serve as a director (an
event which our management does not now expect to occur),
proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee or nominees in
accordance with the best judgment of the person or persons
acting under them.
Our Board of Directors has nominated James A. Faulconbridge,
Patrick H. Hawkins, Duane M. Jergenson, John S. McKeon, Daryl I.
Skaar, James T. Thompson and Jeffrey L. Wright for election to
the Board of Directors.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE
FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.
Information
About Our Directors
Our directors have served as our directors continuously since
the year indicated below. The following information, as of
May 31, 2011, including the principal occupation or
employment of each director nominee, has been furnished to us by
the respective director nominees. All positions are with our
Company unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
Director
|
|
Principal Occupation or Employment
|
|
Age
|
|
Since
|
|
John S. McKeon
|
|
Chairman of the Board since 2005; Retired; President and Chief
Operating Officer of ConAgra Foods, Inc. Venture Development
Group from 2003 to 2005; President and Chief Operating Officer
of ConAgra Foods Snack Group (formerly Golden Valley Microwave
Foods, Inc.) from 1993 to 2003; President of McKeon Associates,
Inc. (corporate finance consulting) from 1991 to 1993; Vice
President of Northstar Industries, Inc. from 1976 to 1990.
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1984
|
|
Patrick H. Hawkins
|
|
Chief Executive Officer since 2011; President since 2010;
Business Director Food and Pharmaceuticals from
2009-2010;
Business Manager Food and Co-Extrusion Products from
2007-2009;
Sales Representative Food Ingredients from
2002-2009;
various positions with the Company from 1992 to 2002.
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
James A. Faulconbridge
|
|
President of Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. (engineering and
technical services) since 1996.
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
Director
|
|
Principal Occupation or Employment
|
|
Age
|
|
Since
|
|
Duane M. Jergenson
|
|
Retired; Vice President of Operations of Taylor Corporation from
1985 to 1999; various positions with Taylor Corporation from
1966 to 1985.
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1996
|
|
Daryl I. Skaar
|
|
Retired; Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer of Lucent
Technologies from 1997 to 2000; various positions at 3M from
1965 to 1997, most recently as Vice President of Purchasing and
Packaging Engineering.
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
James T. Thompson
|
|
Retired; Executive Vice President Commercial of The
Mosaic Company from 2004 to 2007; board member, Sims Metal
Management since 2009; various positions at Cargill, Inc. from
1974 to 2004, most recently as President of Cargill Steel from
1996 to 2004.
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Jeffrey L. Wright
|
|
G&K Services, Inc. Chief Financial Officer
since 1999, Executive Vice President and Director since May
2009, Senior Vice President from 2004 to 2009, Treasurer and
Secretary from 1999 to 2003; BMC Industries, Inc.
Treasurer from 1998 to 1999, Controller from 1996 to 1998;
various positions at Employee Benefit Plans, Inc. from 1993 to
1996, most recently as Vice President and Treasurer; employed by
Arthur Andersen & Co. from 1984 to 1993.
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
There are no family relationships among any of our directors,
executive officers, or director nominees.
Each director nominee brings unique capabilities to our Board of
Directors. The Board believes the nominees as a group have the
experience and skills in areas such as general business
management, corporate governance, manufacturing, finance,
strategic planning and risk management that are necessary to
effectively oversee our Company. In addition, the Board believes
that each of our directors possesses high standards of ethics,
integrity and professionalism, sound judgment and a commitment
to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders. The
following is information as to why each nominee should serve as
a director of our Company:
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. McKeon has been our Chairman of the Board since
2005 and has extensive experience in management, manufacturing
and corporate finance, having served as President and Chief
Operating Officer of ConAgra Foods, Inc. Venture Development
Group. His knowledge of our Company and its business is also
valuable in formulating and executing our business plans and
growth strategies.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Hawkins was appointed as our Chief Executive
Officer in 2011. Mr. Hawkins has been with the Company for
more than 18 years, giving him an intimate knowledge of our
Company and its business and a deep passion for our
Companys continued success.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Faulconbridge is a principal of
Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc., an engineering and technical
services firm that services a broad variety of industries,
including the ethanol industry. His background provides the
Company with technical expertise and insight into ethanol and
other industries we serve.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Jergenson has been on our Board for
14 years. His operations management experience with Taylor
Corporation, one of the largest privately held companies in the
United States, provides valuable perspective and insight as our
Company seeks and implements growth opportunities.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Skaar has extensive experience in purchasing and
procurement for large public companies, having served as Vice
President and Chief Procurement Officer at Lucent Technologies
and Vice President of Purchasing and Packing Engineering at 3M.
This experience is valuable given the large number of products
we must buy to operate our business.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Thompson has experience with major manufacturing
and commodity companies having served 30 years at Cargill,
Inc., including eight years as President of Cargill Steel, and
three years as Executive Vice President Commercial
for The Mosaic Company, the worlds leading producer and
marketer of
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
concentrated phosphate and potash. This knowledge and experience
is valuable to us in our commodity chemicals business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Wright has extensive public company finance and
audit experience, serving as Chief Financial Officer of G&K
Services, Inc. and having been employed by Arthur
Andersen & Co. He also has public company board
experience, serving as a director of G&K Services, Inc. His
background provides us with valuable financial and accounting
experience as well as public company board experience.
|
Director
Independence
Our Board of Directors has determined that, of the director
nominees, each of Messrs. Faulconbridge, Jergenson, McKeon,
Skaar, Thompson and Wright are Independent Directors
as that term is defined under the applicable listing standards
of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Accordingly, a majority of our
directors are independent. In connection with its determination
of independence, our Board of Directors determined that
Mr. Wrights director and officer positions with
G&K Services, Inc., which is a customer of and supplier of
services to the Company, did not constitute a relationship that
would interfere with Mr. Wrights exercise of
independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a
director of our Company. All of our transactions with G&K
Services, Inc. during the most recent completed fiscal year were
conducted on arms-length terms in the ordinary course of
business, and the amount of the transactions represents less
than one percent of the annual revenues of both G&K
Services, Inc. and our Company.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Meetings
of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors held ten meetings during the fiscal year
ended April 3, 2011, hereinafter referred to as
fiscal 2011. All directors attended at least 75% of
the meetings of our Board of Directors and the committees on
which they served. All directors attended our Annual Meeting of
Shareholders in 2010. Our Board of Directors encourages, but
does not require, director attendance at annual meetings of
shareholders.
Leadership
Structure of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors does not have a policy regarding the
separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board as the Board of Directors believes it is in the
best interests of the Company to make that determination based
on the position and direction of the Company and the membership
of the Board. The positions of Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board are not currently held by the same person.
This structure allows us to more fully utilize the skills of
Mr. McKeon and ensures a greater active participation of
the directors in setting agendas and establishing Board
priorities and procedures. Further, this structure permits our
Chief Executive Officer to focus on the management of the
Companys
day-to-day
operations.
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee, which consists of Jeffrey L. Wright
(Chair), James A. Faulconbridge, and Daryl I. Skaar, is
responsible for, among other things, selecting and appointing
our independent auditors, meeting with the independent auditors
and financial management to review the scope of the audit and
the audit procedures, reviewing annually the responsibilities of
the Audit Committee and recommending to our Board of Directors
any changes to these responsibilities, and establishing and
reviewing internal controls. The Audit Committee held four
meetings during fiscal 2011.
Our Board of Directors has determined that all members of the
Audit Committee are independent as that term is used
in Section 10A(m) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and Independent Directors as that term is defined
under the applicable listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock
Market. Our Board of Directors has determined that
Messrs. Wright, Faulconbridge, and Skaar are audit
committee financial
4
experts, as the term is defined by regulations promulgated
by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the
Audit Committee Charter. A current copy of the charter is
available on our website (www.hawkinsinc.com).
Compensation
Committee
The Compensation Committee, which consists of James T. Thompson
(Chair), Duane M. Jergenson, Daryl I. Skaar, and Jeffrey L.
Wright, is responsible for establishing compensation policies
for our Company and for reviewing and setting compensation for
our executive officers. The Compensation Committee held five
meetings during fiscal 2011.
Our Board of Directors has determined that all members of the
Compensation Committee are Independent Directors as
that term is defined under the applicable listing standards of
the NASDAQ Stock Market, non-employee directors as
that term is defined in
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
outside directors as that term is used in
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.
The Compensation Committee retained independent compensation
consultant McLagan, formerly Amalfi Consulting, to provide the
Compensation Committee with independent advice regarding
industry practices and peer company compensation programs for
fiscal 2011. No member of the Board of Directors or any
executive officer has any affiliation with McLagan. McLagan
provides no other services to the Company, and has reported
directly to the chair of the Compensation Committee. McLagan
advised the Compensation Committee on the principal aspects of
our executive compensation components and best practices in
executive compensation and provides market information and
analysis regarding the competitiveness of levels and components
of total compensation for the Companys named executive
officers for fiscal 2011. In determining the competitiveness of
such compensation, the Compensation Committee reviewed survey
data prepared by McLagan. The Company does not benchmark its
compensation. The Compensation Committee reviews and considers
the information provided by McLagan to understand current
compensation practices, levels and structures and to inform its
compensation decisions, but not to establish specific
compensation parameters based on such data.
The Compensation Committee also regularly consults with our
Chief Executive Officer, who makes recommendations to the
Compensation Committee regarding compensation of our executive
officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. Additional
information on the role of the compensation consultants and
management in the Compensation Committees processes and
procedures can be found in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section below.
The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth
in the Compensation Committee Charter. A current copy of the
charter is available on our website (www.hawkinsinc.com).
Governance
and Nominating Committee
The Governance and Nominating Committee, which consists of James
A. Faulconbridge (Chair), John S. McKeon, James T. Thompson and
Jeffrey L. Wright, is responsible for identifying individuals
qualified to become directors and recommending nominees to our
Board of Directors for election at annual meetings of
shareholders and to fill vacancies, monitoring developments in
director compensation and, as appropriate, developing and
recommending to our Board corporate governance principles
applicable to us and overseeing public policy matters and
compliance with our Code of Conduct. The Governance and
Nominating Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2011. The
responsibilities of the Governance and Nominating Committee are
set forth in the Governance and Nominating Committee Charter. A
current copy of the charter is available on our website
(www.hawkinsinc.com). The Governance and Nominating Committee
evaluated potential candidates for director nomination on the
basis indicated below and recommended to the Board of Directors
that the director nominees included in this Proxy Statement be
submitted to the shareholders for election at the upcoming
Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
5
Nominating
Process
In order to maintain flexibility in its consideration of
candidates, our Board of Directors does not have a formal policy
regarding the consideration of any director candidates
recommended by shareholders. However, the Governance and
Nominating Committee would consider for possible nomination
qualified nominees recommended by shareholders in compliance
with our By-laws. To make a director nomination, a shareholder
should send the director candidates name, credentials and
contact information, a signed statement consenting to his or her
nomination and agreeing, if elected, to serve as a director, a
completed director nominee questionnaire (available from our
Secretary upon request) and the other information required by
our By-laws, to our Secretary no later than 90 days prior
to the first anniversary of the preceding years annual
meeting. The proposing shareholder should also include his or
her contact information and evidence that the person submitting
the nomination is a shareholder of the Company. The Governance
and Nominating Committee will evaluate candidates (nominated by
shareholders or otherwise) based on financial literacy,
knowledge of our industry or other background relevant to our
needs, status as a stakeholder in our Company,
independence for purposes of compliance with
Internal Revenue Service and SEC rules and NASDAQ Stock Market
listing standards, and willingness, ability and availability for
service. The Company does not have a formal policy with regard
to the consideration of diversity in identifying director
nominees, but the Governance and Nominating Committee strives to
nominate directors with a variety of complementary skills so
that, as a group, the Board will possess the appropriate talent,
skills, and expertise to oversee the Companys businesses.
Risk
Oversight
The Companys management is responsible for identifying the
various risks facing the Company, formulating risk management
policies and procedures, and managing the Companys risk
exposures on a
day-to-day
basis. The Board of Directors is responsible for monitoring the
Companys risk management processes by informing itself
concerning the Companys material risks and evaluating
whether management has reasonable controls in place to address
the material risks. The Board is not responsible, however, for
identifying or managing the Companys various risks. The
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is primarily
responsible for monitoring managements responsibility in
the area of risk oversight, and risk management is a factor the
Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee consider when
determining which directors serve on the Audit Committee.
Accordingly, management has reported to the Audit Committee on
various risk management matters during fiscal 2011. The Audit
Committee, in turn, reports on the matters discussed at the
committee level to the full Board of Directors. The Audit
Committee and the Board of Directors focus on the material risks
facing the Company, including operational, market, liquidity,
legal and regulatory risks, to assess whether management has
reasonable controls in place to address these risks. The Board
believes this allocation of responsibility provides an effective
and efficient approach for addressing risk management.
Communications
with Directors
Shareholders can contact the full Board of Directors, the
independent directors as a group or any of the individual
directors by writing to our Secretary at 3100 East Hennepin
Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413. All communications will be
compiled by the Secretary and submitted to the addressees on a
periodic basis.
REPORT OF
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Audit Committee has (i) reviewed and discussed our
audited financial statements for fiscal 2011 with both our
management and KPMG LLP (KPMG); (ii) discussed
with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by Statement of
Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, regarding
communications with audit committees; (iii) received from
KPMG the written disclosures and the letter required by
applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board regarding the independent accountants
communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence
and discussed with KPMG its
6
independence; and (iv) considered whether the non-audit
services provided by KPMG are compatible with maintaining the
independence of KPMG.
Based on the review and discussions described above, the Audit
Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that our audited
financial statements be included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for fiscal 2011 for filing with the SEC.
Jeffrey
L. Wright (Chair) James A.
Faulconbridge Daryl I. Skaar
Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS FEES
Our Audit Committee dismissed Deloitte & Touche LLP as
the Companys independent registered public accounting firm
effective June 9, 2009. Neither of Deloittes reports
on the financial statements of the Company for fiscal years
ended March 30, 2008 or March 29, 2009, hereinafter
referred to as fiscal 2008 and fiscal
2009, respectively, contained an adverse opinion or
disclaimer of opinion, or was qualified or modified as to
uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During
fiscal years 2008 and 2009 and through June 9, 2009, there
were no disagreements with Deloitte on any matter of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or
auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to
Deloittes satisfaction, would have caused Deloitte to make
reference to the subject matter in connection with its reports
on the Companys financial statements for such periods.
During the same periods, there were no reportable events of the
type set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K.
The Company provided Deloitte with a copy of this disclosure and
requested that Deloitte furnish the Company with a letter
addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating
whether it agrees with the above statements. The letter from
Deloitte was filed under cover of Amendment No. 1 to a
Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
on June 17, 2009.
On June 9, 2009, our Audit Committee approved the
engagement of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2010. During fiscal
years 2008 and 2009 and through June 9, 2009, the Company
had not consulted with KPMG with respect to any of the matters
or reportable events set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) or
(ii) of
Regulation S-K.
The following table shows the aggregate fees billed to us by our
independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, for
services rendered during fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010. The Audit
Committee pre-approved 100% of the services described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
Description of Fees
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
267,300
|
|
|
$
|
212,000
|
|
Tax Fees(b)
|
|
|
100,880
|
|
|
|
44,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
368,180
|
|
|
$
|
256,350
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes tax preparation and consulting fees. |
The Audit Committees current practice on pre-approval of
services performed by our independent registered public
accounting firm is to approve annually all audit services, as
well as the nature and extent of specific types of
audit-related, tax and other non-audit services to be provided
by the independent registered public accounting firm during the
year. The Audit Committee reviews each non-audit service to be
provided and assesses the impact of the service on the
auditors independence. As the need arises, other specific
permitted services are pre-approved on a
case-by-case
basis during the year. The Audit Committee has delegated to its
chair pre-approval authority between meetings of the Audit
Committee. Any pre-approvals made by the chair must be reported
to the Audit Committee.
7
COMPENSATION
OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and
retain executives who will lead our Company to achieve long-term
success and growth in shareholder value. Consistent with that
goal, our executive compensation is based on Company, business
unit and individual performance to align the interests of our
executive officers with those of our shareholders and is used to
encourage our executive officers to stay with the Company. Our
executive compensation program currently includes a mix of
elements that rewards current results as well as motivates
long-term performance through an appropriate balance of base pay
and performance-based variable compensation. Our
performance-based variable compensation consists of a short-term
component that provides significant incentives relative to both
superior current business results as well as personal
performance, and a long-term incentive plan that motivates
long-term performance and aligns business objectives with the
interests of our shareholders.
Our profitability in fiscal 2011 declined slightly from fiscal
2010 levels. Gross profit was $61.9 million, or 20.8% of
sales, for fiscal 2011, as compared to $64.4 million, or
25.1% of sales, for fiscal 2010. The LIFO method of valuing
inventory decreased gross profit by $3.9 million for fiscal
2011 due to increased raw material costs and higher inventory
volumes at year-end maintained to meet customer requirements
during an anticipated flood. In the prior year, LIFO increased
gross profit by $12.6 million due to decreases in certain
raw material costs during that period. As a result, our
executive officers received below-target payouts under the
corporate and business unit performance measures under our
annual non-equity incentive compensation arrangement and earned
below the targeted number of restricted shares under the
performance-based restricted stock units granted for fiscal 2011
as described below.
During the same period, our executives negotiated and completed
the acquisition of substantially all the assets of Vertex
Chemical Company, which provides us with significant expansion
opportunities, and also managed a transition between Chief
Executive Officers. These were among the factors considered by
the Compensation Committee in providing at target or above
target awards under the individual performance measures under
our annual non-equity incentive compensation arrangements.
Our Chief Executive Officer John R. Hawkins passed away on
March 9, 2011. On March 11, 2011, our Board of
Directors appointed Patrick H. Hawkins, then President of our
Company, to serve as Chief Executive Officer in accordance with
our existing succession plan. The Board did not make any changes
to Patrick H. Hawkins compensatory arrangements in
connection with his promotion and they remained unchanged
through the remainder of fiscal 2011. References in this
Compensation Discussion and Analysis to Chief Executive
Officer means John R. Hawkins, unless otherwise noted.
Determining
Executive Compensation for Fiscal 2011
Our executive compensation program for the last fiscal year
consisted of the following elements:
|
|
|
|
|
base salary,
|
|
|
|
annual non-equity incentive compensation,
|
|
|
|
annual equity awards,
|
|
|
|
contributions to long-term benefit plans, and
|
|
|
|
other benefits.
|
The Compensation Committee does not benchmark the total
compensation or any element of compensation to our executives.
It also does not apply a mechanical formula or target a specific
amount relative to comparative data for any individual nor does
it target a specific amount or relative weight for any component
of compensation. Rather, the Compensation Committee members
reviewed and considered broad-based third-party survey data to
understand current compensation practices, levels and structures
and thereby inform its compensation decisions, but not to
establish specific compensation parameters based on such data.
The data
8
was collected by independent compensation consultant McLagan,
formerly Amalfi Consulting, a compensation consulting firm,
which also provided the Compensation Committee with independent
advice on industry practices and information on compensation
programs of companies offering products similar to ours and from
companies of comparable size to us that the Compensation
Committee used in determining the compensation received by our
executives during fiscal 2011. The Compensation Committee did
not select the companies that McLagan included in its sample,
although it did have input into the criteria used by McLagan in
the selection process. The Compensation Committee did not use
the information provided to it by McLagan in a formulaic manner,
but instead used the information to inform its judgment
regarding the appropriate levels and components of total
compensation for the Companys executive officers. The
Compensation Committee considered all elements of compensation
together and utilized the members experience and judgment
in determining the total compensation opportunity and mix of
compensation elements appropriate for each executive officer in
light of our compensation objectives.
The Compensation Committee viewed the information provided by
McLagan as one of a number of tools available to the Committee
in assessing executive compensation. The Compensation Committee
also regularly consults with our Chief Executive Officer, who
makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding
compensation of our executive officers other than the Chief
Executive Officer. Our Chief Executive Officer participates in
some of the Compensation Committees deliberations
regarding compensation for our other executive officers,
although all determinations are made by the Compensation
Committee.
Elements
of Executive Officer Compensation
Base
Salary
We provide base salaries to our executive officers to compensate
them for fulfilling their primary responsibilities and to
provide financial stability. The Compensation Committee annually
reviews, and adjusts as appropriate, base salaries for our
executive officers. In June 2010, the Compensation Committee
made market adjustments to base salaries for fiscal 2011 based
on its evaluation of the competitive information available to
it. The base salaries paid to our executive officers during the
last three completed fiscal years are listed in the Summary
Compensation Table below.
Annual
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation
Annual non-equity incentive compensation is a key component of
our executive compensation strategy. The purpose of annual
incentive compensation is to provide cash compensation that is
variable based on the achievement of performance goals
established by the Compensation Committee. Our executive
officers do not have a contractual right to receive a fixed
bonus for any fiscal year.
Our non-equity incentive arrangement (described below) provides
for no payout to executive officers unless a specified portion
of the target is achieved and allows for a significantly
increased payout if the target is exceeded. Beginning in fiscal
2011, cash incentive payments were determined and paid once each
year following the completion of our annual audit.
For fiscal 2011, the Compensation Committee designated the
following factors for determining whether a cash incentive
payment would be paid under the arrangement for a particular
performance period and in what amount:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate performance,
|
|
|
|
business unit performance for the executive in charge of such
unit, and
|
|
|
|
individual objectives.
|
The corporate performance portion of the annual cash incentive
payment was based on our Company-wide results for fiscal 2011 as
measured by income before taxes as compared to a targeted level
of income before taxes for that period. The 2011 target was
adjusted to exclude costs related to the accelerated vesting of
outstanding equity awards incurred in fiscal 2011 due to the
death of our Chief Executive Officer, John Hawkins, and the
acceleration of certain payments due to John Hawkins under his
Retention Bonus
9
Agreement. For fiscal 2011, the targeted level of income before
taxes was $34,500,000, while the actual performance was
$33,281,000. The business unit performance portion of the
incentive payment was based on an operational measure of
business unit profitability for fiscal 2011 as compared to a
targeted measure for the respective business unit for that
period. The targeted Water Treatment Group measure was
$23,400,000, while the actual performance was $23,300,000. The
targeted Industrial Group measure was $44,000,000, while the
actual performance was $43,963,000. In each case, the targeted
levels of performance were based on the level of anticipated
performance that was derived from the Companys annual
operating plan. The Compensation Committee set these target
performance levels to ensure that a substantial portion of each
executive officers cash compensation is tied to corporate
and business unit performance, as appropriate, and to provide
our executives with a performance-based opportunity to achieve
market-competitive total compensation.
The Compensation Committee established multiple individual
objectives for each executive officer for the fiscal year. The
individual objectives for our Chief Executive Officer included
succession planning, strategic planning matters and developing a
growth plan for the business. For our President, the individual
objectives included strengthening our relationships with key
customers and suppliers, strengthening working relationships
within our groups and continued leadership development. For our
Chief Financial Officer, the individual objectives included
supporting acquisition activities and staff development. For our
General Counsel, the individual objectives included supporting
acquisition activities and managing the business insurance
renewal process. For our Vice President Water
Treatment Group, the individual objectives included business
expansion initiatives and staff planning. For our Vice
President Industrial, the individual objectives
included customer relationship matters and new product
initiatives. The Compensation Committee consulted with our Chief
Executive Officer, Patrick H. Hawkins, for his assessment of the
degree to which the other executive officers had met their
respective individual objectives and then made its own
determination as to the appropriate level of payout under these
measures for each of the executive officers.
The Compensation Committee determined that 80% of the annual
cash incentive payment opportunities for our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel for fiscal
2011 should be based upon Company-wide performance against the
income targets to reflect their significant Company-wide
responsibilities and resulting ability to impact the overall
success of the Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee
determined that 20% should be based upon meeting their
individual objectives.
The Compensation Committee determined that 40% of the annual
cash incentive payment opportunities for Ms. Paulson and
Mr. Sevenich for fiscal 2011 should be based upon
Company-wide performance and 40% should be based upon the
profitability of their respective business units to reflect
their dual roles as leaders of their respective business units
and as members of the Companys overall executive
management team. In addition, the Compensation Committee
determined that 20% should be based upon meeting their
individual objectives.
The annual cash incentive payment opportunities for
participating executive officers were based on the following
percentages of base salary for fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Annual Cash
|
|
Annual Cash
|
|
Annual Cash
|
Position
|
|
Incentive Payment
|
|
Incentive Payment
|
|
Incentive Payment
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
120
|
%
|
President
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
General Counsel
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
Vice President Water Treatment Group
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
Vice President Industrial Group
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
The Compensation Committee established the targets for each of
the executive officers based on the relative scope of his or her
responsibilities and resulting ability to impact the
Companys performance. The Compensation Committee
established a higher target opportunity for the Chief Executive
Officer to reflect his significant responsibilities regarding
the creation and implementation of long-term strategic direction
for the entire Company.
10
No annual cash incentive payments are made unless the threshold
level of 80% of the respective performance target is achieved.
Performance between 80% and 100% of the respective target is
awarded on a sliding scale from 50% of the target annual cash
incentive payment for exactly achieving 80% of the performance
target to 100% of the target annual cash incentive payment for
achieving the respective target (e.g., 90% of performance
target will lead to an award of 75% of the target annual cash
incentive payment). Performance between 100% and 120% of the
respective target is awarded on a sliding scale from 100% of the
target annual cash incentive payment for exactly meeting the
performance target to 200% of the target annual cash incentive
payment for exceeding the performance target by 20% (e.g., 105%
of performance target will lead to an award of 125% of the
target annual cash incentive payment). Performance over 120% of
the applicable performance target does not result in any
additional annual cash incentive payment.
As a result of our financial performance for the fiscal year, no
participating executive officer met their respective corporate
and business unit performance targets. As a result, each
participating executive officer received less than the targeted
payout under the financial measures. Achievement of individual
objectives is more qualitative and subjective and
Ms. Paulson was determined to have attained her individual
objectives for the fiscal year, while Ms. Pepski and
Messrs. Patrick Hawkins and Erstad were determined to have
exceeded their individual objectives for the year and
Mr. Sevenich was determined to have attained the threshold
level of performance for his individual objectives.
Ms. Paulson received the targeted annual cash incentive
payment for individual objectives, while Ms. Pepski and
Messrs. Patrick Hawkins and Erstad received the maximum
annual cash incentive payment for individual objectives based on
exceeding the targeted performance on their personal objectives
and Mr. Sevenich received the minimum annual cash payment
for individual objectives based on attaining the threshold level
of performance based on his individual objectives. While the
Compensation Committee has discretion to adjust the size of the
final payouts under the program, it has not done so.
Equity
Awards
Our equity incentive compensation program is designed to:
|
|
|
|
|
align the interests of the participants with those of our
shareholders,
|
|
|
|
provide incentives for the retention of executive officers,
|
|
|
|
establish a minimum level of performance for payouts under
certain of the equity awards,
|
|
|
|
provide an opportunity for increased payouts for performance in
excess of established targets under certain of the equity
awards, and
|
|
|
|
provide an equity incentive program comparable to those at
competitive companies.
|
The equity incentive award program had consisted of a
combination of:
|
|
|
|
|
grants to each executive officer of traditional stock options at
fair market value on the date of grant with vesting on the third
anniversary of the date of grant, and
|
|
|
|
grants of performance-based restricted stock unit awards based
on Company performance during the current fiscal year with any
related restricted stock vesting on the second anniversary of
the end of that fiscal year.
|
For fiscal 2011, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance
of McLagan, reviewed our equity incentive award practices and
determined to discontinue granting stock options to our
executives and increased the targeted level of performance-based
restricted stock units granted to each executive. The change was
made to make a greater portion of the executives
compensation performance based. As a result, each
executives targeted grant is based on a percentage of the
executives base salary, rather than a fixed number of
units. Under this program, in June 2010 each executive officer
was granted a performance-based restricted stock unit award
representing a future issuance of restricted shares of our
common stock based on a pre-tax income target for the fiscal
year.
11
The actual number of restricted shares issued to each executive
officer under the performance-based restricted stock unit is
based on a sliding scale for pre-tax income above or below the
target and is subject to minimum and maximum thresholds. For
fiscal 2011, the pre-tax income target was set at $34,500,000,
the same level as our target used for our non-equity incentive
plan arrangement described above, while our actual performance
was $33,281,000. If our pre-tax income were less than 80% of the
target pre-tax income in fiscal 2011, then no executive officer
would have received restricted shares from the performance-based
restricted stock units. If our pre-tax income were between 80%
and 100% of the target in fiscal 2011, then the executive
officers would have received a number of restricted shares based
on a sliding scale between 50% of the target restricted shares
and 100% of the target restricted shares. If our pre-tax income
were between 100% and 120% of the target in fiscal 2011, then
the executive officers would have received a number of
restricted shares based on a sliding scale between 100% of the
target restricted shares and 150% of the target restricted
shares. Because our pre-tax income was more than 80%, but less
than 100%, of the target in fiscal 2011, the executive officers
each received fewer than the targeted number of restricted
shares.
The Compensation Committee established the following
performance-based restricted stock unit award amounts for the
executive officers for fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target % of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
CEO
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
7,410
|
|
|
|
14,820
|
|
|
|
22,230
|
|
President
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
4,068
|
|
|
|
8,136
|
|
|
|
12,205
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
5,579
|
|
|
|
8,369
|
|
General Counsel
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
5,231
|
|
|
|
7,846
|
|
Vice President Water Treatment Group
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
|
|
5,463
|
|
|
|
8,194
|
|
Vice President Industrial Group
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
|
|
4,928
|
|
|
|
7,392
|
|
The Compensation Committee established the targeted
performance-based restricted stock unit award for each of the
executive officers based on a percentage of each officers
base salary, divided by the closing stock price on the date of
grant. The percentages were based the Compensation
Committees assessment of the relative scope of his or her
responsibilities and the resulting ability of the individual to
impact the Companys performance, as well as information
provided by McLagan.
The number of shares actually issued to John Hawkins upon his
death was based on the terms of the applicable performance-based
restricted stock unit award notice and restricted stock
agreement, which required that we issue him the target number in
the case of death. The actual number of restricted shares issued
to each of the other executive officers was determined after our
audited financial information became available for fiscal 2011.
The restricted shares will vest 100% two years after the last
day of fiscal 2011. The restricted shares will terminate in
their entirety if the executive officer departs the Company
before the end of the vesting period other than in cases of
death or disability.
In the event of a change in control of the Company or other
fundamental change as defined below, then the
performance-based restricted stock unit award will vest
immediately at 100% of its target if the Compensation Committee
determines that the fundamental change will not result in the
continuation of the performance-based restricted stock unit
award. Any shares of restricted stock outstanding under
performance-based restricted stock unit awards will also
immediately vest. If a performance-based restricted stock unit
award is continued after a fundamental change, but, in
connection with the fundamental change, an executive is
terminated without cause or resigns for good cause, then the
performance-based restricted stock unit award and any restricted
stock granted under the performance-based restricted stock unit
award will vest in the same manner. We believe that these
triggers in our performance-based restricted stock unit award
notices in connection with a fundamental change strike an
appropriate balance between Company and shareholder concerns
about executive retention in the event of a fundamental change
and an executives legitimate concerns regarding
termination or diminution of duties as a result of a fundamental
change or a change in
12
control. In our 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, fundamental
change generally includes any one of the following, unless
otherwise provided in an award agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
the consummation of a corporate transaction, subject to certain
exceptions;
|
|
|
|
any person or group becomes the beneficial owner of more than
50% of the combined voting power of the Company, subject to
certain exceptions; or
|
|
|
|
continuing directors cease to constitute a majority of the
members of our Board of Directors.
|
Corporate transaction means any dissolution
or liquidation of the Company, sale of substantially all of its
assets, merger or consolidation involving the Company, or
statutory share exchange involving Company stock. Similarly,
continuing director means an individual who is, as
of the effective date of the corporate transaction, a director
of the Company, or who becomes a director after the effective
date and whose initial election, or nomination for election by
the Companys shareholders, was approved by at least a
majority of the then continuing directors, but excluding anyone
whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an
actual or threatened election contest solicitation of proxies or
consents by a person other than our Board of Directors.
Contribution
to Long-Term Benefit Plan
All of our executive officers participate in our Profit Sharing
Plan, which is generally available to all other non-bargaining
unit employees. Contributions to the Profit Sharing Plan by us
on behalf of our executive officers have been a key component of
our retention objectives since the contributed benefits
initially vest over a six-year period.
Under the plan, our executive officers participate on the same
terms as all other eligible employees, with the annual
compensation that was used to determine plan benefits being
capped at $245,000 for fiscal 2011. This limit will be adjusted
in future years under federal tax law for
cost-of-living
increases.
Under our Profit Sharing Plan, we contributed a percentage of
each eligible participants compensation to an account
maintained for the participant under the plan. Participant
accounts are credited with the appropriate gains or losses
resulting from employee-directed investments made by the plan.
During recent years, including fiscal 2011, we made
contributions to this plan equal to 15% of each
participants compensation, subject to the cap on the plan
benefits. For fiscal 2011, we contributed $36,750 on behalf of
each named executive officer.
Other
Benefits
The Compensation Committee believes that we must offer a
competitive benefits program to attract and retain our executive
officers. During fiscal 2011, we provided medical and other
health and welfare benefits to our executive officers that are
generally available to our other employees. We currently permit
any employee who retires after working for us for at least
25 years to continue to participate in our health insurance
coverage until that person reaches the age of 65. The cost to
the retired employee for that coverage is equivalent to the
amount that the retiree would have been obligated to pay for the
coverage under COBRA (the Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act). This policy is based on the importance we
place on the retention of our employees, including our executive
officers.
The only perquisite we offer to our executive officers is the
personal use of a company car.
Other
Agreements and Policies
Tax
Deductibility of Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code denies a
deduction to any publicly-held corporation for compensation paid
to certain covered employees in a taxable year to
the extent that compensation to such covered employee exceeds
$1.0 million. Under current IRS interpretations, a
covered employee is the chief executive officer of
the Company and any other executive officer (other than the
chief financial officer) who is among the three other most
highly compensated officers employed by the Company at a
year-end.
13
Certain kinds of compensation, including qualified
performance-based compensation, are disregarded for
purposes of the deduction limitation. In order to qualify as
performance-based compensation for
Section 162(m) purposes, compensation must satisfy certain
requirements, including that the vesting and payment such
compensation must generally be conditioned upon the satisfaction
over a specified performance period of pre-established
performance goals set by the Compensation Committee. The
Compensation Committee believes that all of the incentive based
compensation we granted to our executive officers is
performance-based for purposes of Section 162(m), and
therefore no named executive officer exceeded the $1.0 limit.
Compensation
Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has discussed and reviewed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon
this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and
incorporated by reference in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
James T.
Thompson (Chair) Duane M.
Jergenson Daryl I.
Skaar Jeffrey L. Wright
Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation of our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the three other
highest paid executive officers (collectively, the named
executive officers).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(b)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
($)(c)
|
|
($)(d)
|
|
($)
|
|
John R. Hawkins
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
435,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,778
|
|
|
|
728,762
|
|
|
|
1,768,683
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
341,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,827
|
|
|
|
144,332
|
|
|
|
378,000
|
|
|
|
50,386
|
|
|
|
1,079,787
|
|
(until March 9, 2011)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
327,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,578
|
|
|
|
98,370
|
|
|
|
359,083
|
|
|
|
46,384
|
|
|
|
960,057
|
|
Patrick H. Hawkins
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,107
|
|
|
|
39,572
|
|
|
|
687,747
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(beginning March 11, 2011)and
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President (beginning March 29, 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen P. Pepski
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
238,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,416
|
|
|
|
45,938
|
|
|
|
536,473
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
212,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,427
|
|
|
|
40,412
|
|
|
|
156,600
|
|
|
|
43,678
|
|
|
|
499,769
|
|
Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
208,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,998
|
|
|
|
27,544
|
|
|
|
158,785
|
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
|
|
432,630
|
|
Richard G. Erstad
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
223,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,230
|
|
|
|
49,534
|
|
|
|
484,193
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
203,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,427
|
|
|
|
40,412
|
|
|
|
111,240
|
|
|
|
10,470
|
|
|
|
411,549
|
|
and Secretary (beginning
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
74,359
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
|
103,409
|
|
November 17, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keenan A. Paulson
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
233,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,228
|
|
|
|
49,548
|
|
|
|
513,068
|
|
Vice President
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
212,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,427
|
|
|
|
40,412
|
|
|
|
139,676
|
|
|
|
39,492
|
|
|
|
471,390
|
|
Water Treatment Group
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
205,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,998
|
|
|
|
27,544
|
|
|
|
136,970
|
|
|
|
37,514
|
|
|
|
443,259
|
|
John R. Sevenich
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
224,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,732
|
|
|
|
39,590
|
|
|
|
473,264
|
|
Vice President Industrial Group
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
198,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,427
|
|
|
|
40,412
|
|
|
|
145,440
|
|
|
|
38,834
|
|
|
|
469,966
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
193,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,998
|
|
|
|
27,544
|
|
|
|
141,052
|
|
|
|
36,346
|
|
|
|
433,993
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards
made each fiscal year, as computed in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 718. See Note 9, Profit Sharing
and Employee Stock Ownership Plans, to our audited financial
statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for fiscal 2011 for a description of our accounting for these
awards and the assumptions used in valuing the awards. |
|
(b) |
|
Each amount shown reflects the grant date fair value of a
performance based restricted stock unit award granted during the
respective fiscal year, with such value computed based on the
probable outcome of the applicable performance conditions as of
the grant date. The values of the performance-based restricted |
14
|
|
|
|
|
unit awards granted in fiscal 2011, assuming the highest level
of performance conditions are achieved, are set forth below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Amount Reported
|
|
Maximum Amount
|
|
Mr. John R. Hawkins
|
|
$
|
382,504
|
|
|
$
|
573,756
|
|
Mr. Patrick H. Hawkins
|
|
$
|
210,068
|
|
|
$
|
315,101
|
|
Ms. Pepski
|
|
$
|
143,994
|
|
|
$
|
215,991
|
|
Mr. Erstad
|
|
$
|
135,012
|
|
|
$
|
202,518
|
|
Ms. Paulson
|
|
$
|
141,000
|
|
|
$
|
211,500
|
|
Mr. Sevenich
|
|
$
|
127,192
|
|
|
$
|
190,788
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
See the description of target levels corporate performance,
business unit performance and individual objectives, as
described under Annual Non-Equity Incentive
Compensation in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
above. All of the amounts reported for fiscal 2011 were paid in
fiscal 2012 after we completed our annual audit. |
|
(d) |
|
Amounts reported for fiscal 2011 include: |
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to John R. Hawkins, $680,000 as acceleration of a
retention bonus that became payable upon the death of
Mr. Hawkins in March 2011
|
|
|
|
Contributions of $36,750 to our Profit Sharing Plan by the
Company on behalf of each of each of our named executive
officers.
|
|
|
|
The remaining amount included for each individual consists of
the personal value of a Company-provided car (based on the
incremental cost to the Company, calculated as the personal use
portion of the amortized cost of acquiring and operating the
car). For income tax purposes, the amount included in the
executive officers income is based on IRS regulations.
This amount is not grossed up for taxes.
|
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information concerning grants of
plan-based awards to our named executive officers during fiscal
2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(a)
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(b)
|
|
Value of Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Awards
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(c)
|
|
John R. Hawkins
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
127,500
|
|
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,410
|
|
|
|
14,820
|
|
|
|
22,230
|
|
|
|
382,504
|
|
Patrick H. Hawkins
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,068
|
|
|
|
8,136
|
|
|
|
12,204
|
|
|
|
210,068
|
|
Kathleen P. Pepski
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
|
|
192,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
5,579
|
|
|
|
8,369
|
|
|
|
143,994
|
|
Richard G. Erstad
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
33,750
|
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
5,231
|
|
|
|
7,847
|
|
|
|
135,012
|
|
Keenan A. Paulson
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
47,000
|
|
|
|
94,000
|
|
|
|
188,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
|
|
5,463
|
|
|
|
8,195
|
|
|
|
141,000
|
|
John R. Sevenich
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
42,400
|
|
|
|
84,800
|
|
|
|
169,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/2/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
|
|
4,928
|
|
|
|
7,392
|
|
|
|
127,192
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Awards represent potential payments under our annual non-equity
incentive arrangement for fiscal 2011. Payments are based on
specified target levels of corporate performance, business unit
performance and individual objectives, as described under
Annual Non-Equity Incentive Compensation in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
|
|
|
The actual amounts earned for fiscal 2011 are the sole
components of Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
in the Summary Compensation Table above. Except in the case of
death or retirement, |
15
|
|
|
|
|
executives must be employed on the date the payments are made
(typically in June of each year with respect to the most
recently completed fiscal year) to be eligible for a payment.
The threshold, target and maximum payments are based on the
plans requirements, which were 30%, 60% and 120% of base
salary, respectively, for our CEO; 25%, 50% and 100% of base
salary, respectively, for our President; 15%, 30% and 60% of
base salary, respectively, for our General Counsel; and 20%, 40%
and 80% of base salary, respectively, for the other named
executive officers. |
|
(b) |
|
Awards represent potential awards of shares of restricted stock
under performance-based restricted stock unit awards granted for
fiscal 2011. The number of restricted shares to be issued was
based on the degree to which specified target levels of income
before taxes were achieved. See Equity Awards in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the performance targets
applicable to the performance-based restricted stock units
granted for performance in fiscal 2011. Additional terms of the
outstanding performance-based restricted stock units are
described in Note (a) to the Outstanding Equity Awards
table. The number of restricted shares actually granted to each
individual for fiscal 2011 performance was below the target
level (except for the grant to Mr. John R. Hawkins, which
under its terms, was granted at target upon his death), and is
as follows: Mr. John R. Hawkins, 14,820 shares;
Mr. Patrick H. Hawkins, 7,417 shares; Ms. Pepski,
5,086 shares; Mr. Erstad, 4,769 shares;
Ms. Paulson, 4,981 shares; and Mr. Sevenich,
4,493 shares. |
|
(c) |
|
Grant date fair value for performance-based restricted stock
units was determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For
the performance-based restricted stock units, the actual number
of restricted shares that could be earned ranged from 0 to 150%
of the target amount. For the performance-based restricted stock
units, the amount reported is based on the assumed probable
outcome of the performance conditions assessed as of the grant
date of the performance-based restricted stock units. |
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2011 Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers
as of April 3, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
Market or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Market
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Value of
|
|
Shares,
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Units or
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Units of
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Stock that
|
|
That Have
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Vested
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
Not Vested
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)(a)
|
|
Vested ($)(b)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
John R. Hawkins(c)
|
|
|
33,333
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.43
|
|
|
|
5/13/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.90
|
|
|
|
6/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick H. Hawkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,417
|
|
|
|
303,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen P. Pepski
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,333
|
(e)
|
|
|
15.43
|
|
|
|
5/13/2018
|
|
|
|
8,586
|
|
|
|
350,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,333
|
(f)
|
|
|
19.90
|
|
|
|
6/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard G. Erstad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,333
|
(f)
|
|
|
19.90
|
|
|
|
6/10/2019
|
|
|
|
8,269
|
|
|
|
337,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keenan A. Paulson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,333
|
(e)
|
|
|
15.43
|
|
|
|
5/13/2018
|
|
|
|
6,148
|
|
|
|
251,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,333
|
(f)
|
|
|
19.90
|
|
|
|
6/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Sevenich
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,333
|
(e)
|
|
|
15.43
|
|
|
|
5/13/2018
|
|
|
|
7,993
|
|
|
|
326,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,333
|
(f)
|
|
|
19.90
|
|
|
|
6/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Consists of shares of restricted stock actually issued under the
performance-based restricted stock unit awards granted for
fiscal 2010 and 2011. The restricted shares vest 100% two years
after the last day of fiscal year for which they were awarded.
The restricted shares will be forfeited in their entirety if the
executive officer departs the Company before the end of the
vesting period. The vesting of the units and |
16
|
|
|
|
|
restricted shares may be accelerated upon the occurrence of
certain events described below under Potential Payments
Upon Termination or Change in Control. |
|
(b) |
|
Based on closing market price of our common stock as of the most
recently completed fiscal year of $40.87 per share. |
|
(c) |
|
All of restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock
unit awards held by Mr. John R. Hawkins were accelerated
and vested upon his death on March 9, 2011 as shown below
under Option Exercises and Stock Vested. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents stock options which vested upon the death of
Mr. John Hawkins on March 9, 2011. |
|
(e) |
|
Represents stock options granted on May 13, 2008, which
became exercisable on May 13, 2011, the third anniversary
of the date of grant. |
|
(f) |
|
Represents stock options granted on June 10, 2009, which
become exercisable on June 10, 2012, the third anniversary
of the date of grant. The vesting of the options may be
accelerated upon the occurrence of certain events described
below under Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change
in Control. |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table provides information concerning the
aggregate number of shares of restricted stock that vested for
each of our named executive officers during fiscal 2011, and the
aggregate dollar values realized by each of our named executive
officers upon such vesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
on Vesting
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
John R. Hawkins(b)
|
|
|
39,820
|
|
|
|
1,494,842
|
|
Patrick H. Hawkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen P. Pepski
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
141,645
|
|
Richard G. Erstad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keenan A. Paulson
|
|
|
5,833
|
|
|
|
234,825
|
|
John R. Sevenich
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
141,645
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts in this column are based on the fair market value of a
share of our common stock on the date of vesting. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes all outstanding shares of restricted stock which vested
in their entirety upon the death of John Hawkins on
March 9, 2011. These restricted shares were issued in
settlement of performance-based restricted stock units that were
themselves subject to accelerated vesting upon
Mr. Hawkins death. |
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
It has not been our practice to provide our officers with any
right to severance payments or benefits, and none of our
executive officers currently has an employment, severance or
change in control agreement or arrangement with us. We did,
however, enter into a retention agreement with John R. Hawkins
that provided for an accelerated payout in connection with his
death. Award agreements for our equity incentive awards provide
for accelerated vesting and exercisability of such awards in
connection with an individuals termination of employment
due to death or disability, or under certain circumstances in
connection with a fundamental change involving the
Company (as defined on page 12 in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis), as described below. The
Compensation Committee also retains the discretion to make
severance payments to an executive officer if it believes the
specific circumstances warrant a payment.
17
Termination
Other than Due to Death or Disability Following a Fundamental
Change
All named executive officers with performance-based restricted
stock units or shares of restricted stock are entitled to
accelerated vesting of the units and the restricted shares
following a fundamental change involving the Company
if (i) the awards will not be continued, assumed or
replaced in connection with the fundamental change, or
(ii) if the awards are continued, assumed or replaced, the
executive is involuntarily terminated without cause or resigns
for good reason during the applicable performance period or
prior to the final vesting of the restricted shares. Under
either of these circumstances, a performance-based restricted
stock unit award will vest immediately at 100% of its target
payout, and any shares of restricted stock issuable in payment
of such units or already outstanding as the result of earlier
payments of performance-based restricted stock unit awards will
also immediately vest. For these purposes, cause for
termination generally involves the commission of a felony or
conviction for a criminal misdemeanor, gross misconduct or fraud
that is likely to cause material harm to the Company, a material
violation of Company policies or its code of conduct, or a
willful or material breach of any agreement with the Company.
Good reason for resignation generally involves a
decrease in base salary, a material diminution in authority,
responsibilities or duties, a relocation of ones principal
work location by more than 50 miles, or a material breach
by the Company of an agreement with the affected executive.
In addition, in connection with a fundamental change involving
the Company, the Compensation Committee may generally
(1) accelerate the vesting of outstanding unvested stock
options, (2) make appropriate provision to protect any
stock option in a manner that equitably preserves the
compensation element of the stock option at the time of the
fundamental change, or (3) cancel the stock option in
exchange for payment of cash equal to the amount, if any, by
which the then current fair market value of the
shares subject to the option exceeds the aggregate exercise
price of the shares covered by the stock option. Fair
market value per share means the cash plus the fair market
value, as determined in good faith by the Compensation
Committee, of the non-cash consideration to be received per
share by the shareholders of the Company upon the occurrence of
the fundamental change.
The following table presents the value of all outstanding
restricted stock unit, restricted stock and option awards that
would have been received by each named executive officer if a
fundamental change took place on the last business day of our
most recently completed fiscal year and all such awards had been
accelerated in connection with such fundamental change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Vesting of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-Based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units/Restricted
|
|
Early Vesting of
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
($)(b)
|
|
($)
|
|
John R. Hawkins(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick H. Hawkins
|
|
|
332,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332,518
|
|
Kathleen P. Pepski
|
|
|
371,059
|
|
|
|
433,145
|
|
|
|
804,203
|
|
Richard G. Erstad
|
|
|
356,836
|
|
|
|
195,713
|
|
|
|
552,549
|
|
Keenan A. Paulson
|
|
|
270,968
|
|
|
|
433,145
|
|
|
|
704,113
|
|
John R. Sevenich
|
|
|
344,452
|
|
|
|
433,145
|
|
|
|
777,597
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts determined by multiplying the number of shares for which
vesting is accelerated by our closing stock price on
April 1, 2011 ($40.87 per share). |
|
(b) |
|
Amounts determined by multiplying the number of option shares
for which vesting is accelerated by our closing stock price on
April 1, 2011 ($40.87 per share) and subtracting the
exercise price of such option shares. |
|
(c) |
|
All awards held by Mr. John R. Hawkins were accelerated in
connection with his death on March 9, 2011 as described
below. |
18
Termination
of Employment Due to Death or Disability
All named executive officers with performance-based restricted
stock units or shares of restricted stock are entitled to
accelerated vesting of the units and the restricted shares upon
termination of employment due to death or disability. In the
event that the executive officers employment with the
Company ceases due to death or disability during a performance
period, then any performance-based restricted stock unit award
will vest immediately at 100% of its target payout. Any shares
of restricted stock issuable in payment of such units or already
outstanding as the result of earlier payments of
performance-based restricted stock unit awards will also
immediately vest. The Company will issue one unrestricted share
in exchange for each vested unit.
In addition, all named executive officers with outstanding
unvested stock options are entitled to accelerated vesting of
the stock options upon termination of employment due to death or
disability.
The following table presents the value of all outstanding
restricted stock unit, restricted stock and option awards that
would have been received by each named executive officer if a
termination of the officer due to death or disability had taken
place on the last business day of our most recently completed
fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Vesting of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-Based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units/Restricted
|
|
Early Vesting of
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
($)(b)
|
|
($)
|
|
John R. Hawkins(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick H. Hawkins
|
|
|
332,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332,518
|
|
Kathleen P. Pepski
|
|
|
371,059
|
|
|
|
433,145
|
|
|
|
804,203
|
|
Richard G. Erstad
|
|
|
356,836
|
|
|
|
195,713
|
|
|
|
552,549
|
|
Keenan A. Paulson
|
|
|
270,968
|
|
|
|
433,145
|
|
|
|
704,113
|
|
John R. Sevenich
|
|
|
344,452
|
|
|
|
433,145
|
|
|
|
777,597
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts determined by multiplying the number of shares for which
vesting is accelerated by our closing stock price on
April 1, 2011 ($40.87 per share). |
|
(b) |
|
Amounts determined by multiplying the number of option shares
for which vesting is accelerated by our closing stock price on
April 1, 2011 ($40.87 per share) and subtracting the
exercise price of such option shares. |
|
(c) |
|
All awards held by Mr. John R. Hawkins were accelerated in
connection with his death on March 9, 2011 as described
below. |
On June 2, 2010, we entered into a Retention Bonus
Agreement with John R. Hawkins, our Chief Executive Officer. The
Retention Bonus Agreement provided that we would pay to
Mr. Hawkins a retention bonus in the amount of $680,000
upon the occurrence of certain conditions and contained a
provision accelerating payment in the event of
Mr. Hawkins death. Mr. Hawkins died in March
2011 and the payment obligation was accelerated. The retention
bonus will be paid to the personal representative of
Mr. Hawkins estate in substantially equal
installments over a period of three years. Also in connection
with Mr. Hawkins death, the exercisability of stock options
involving 66,666 shares was accelerated, and the vesting
and payment in unrestricted shares of a total of 14,820
outstanding performance-based restricted stock units and
restricted shares was accelerated. The value as of the date of
his death of the options accelerated (measured by the difference
between the then-current fair market value of the shares subject
to the options and the aggregate exercise price of those shares)
was $1,324,987 and the value as of the same date of the
restricted stock units and restricted shares whose vesting was
accelerated was $1,494,843.
Director
Compensation for Fiscal 2011
During fiscal 2011, we paid each non-employee director an annual
retainer of $25,000. We paid a supplemental annual retainer of
$15,000 to our Chairman of the Board. We also paid supplemental
annual retainers of $7,500 to the chairs of the Audit and
Compensation committees and $5,000 to the chair of our
19
Governance and Nominating Committee. Additionally, our
non-employee directors received a meeting fee of $2,000 for each
Board and committee meeting attended.
The Compensation Committee oversees our non-employee director
compensation program, under which each non-employee director is
entitled to receive a grant of restricted common stock with a
value of $35,000 on the date of our annual meeting of
shareholders following the directors election or
reelection to the Board by our shareholders. The restricted
stock vests one year from the date of issuance, subject to
acceleration in the event of the directors death or
disability. For service during fiscal 2011, each non-employee
director was granted 1,166 shares of restricted common
stock on July 28, 2010 and these shares will vest in their
entirety one year from their date of issuance.
During fiscal 2006, we entered into a consulting agreement with
John S. McKeon, our Chairman of the Board, which was amended in
fiscal 2010, to provide consulting services for certain
strategic projects. Mr. McKeon received consulting fees of
$75,000 under this arrangement in fiscal 2011.
The following table shows, for each of our current and former
non-employee directors, information concerning annual
compensation earned for services in all capacities during fiscal
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid
|
|
Stock
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name
|
|
in Cash ($)
|
|
Awards ($)(a)
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
James A. Faulconbridge
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
34,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,980
|
|
Duane M. Jergenson
|
|
|
52,000
|
|
|
|
34,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,980
|
|
John S. McKeon
|
|
|
79,000
|
|
|
|
34,980
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(b)
|
|
|
188,980
|
|
Daryl I. Skaar
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
34,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,980
|
|
James T. Thompson
|
|
|
65,500
|
|
|
|
34,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,480
|
|
Jeffrey L. Wright
|
|
|
71,500
|
|
|
|
34,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,480
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Each member of the Board received 1,166 shares of
restricted stock as part of his retainer on July 28, 2010
pursuant to the 2010 Plan. The amounts shown in this column
represent the grant-date fair value of each of the awards
computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 9,
Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plans, to our
audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for fiscal 2011 for a description of our accounting for these
awards and the assumptions used in valuing the awards. All of
these shares vest in full on July 28, 2011, are eligible to
receive dividends paid on our common stock and were the only
shares of restricted stock held by each director at the end of
our most recently completed fiscal year. |
|
(b) |
|
Consists of consulting fees, as described above. |
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
All decisions regarding compensation of our executive officers
during fiscal 2011 were made by the Compensation Committee of
our Board of Directors. During fiscal 2011, the following
directors served on the Compensation Committee: Duane M.
Jergenson, James T. Thompson, Daryl I. Skaar and Jeffrey L.
Wright. None of our executive officers participates in any Board
or committee vote setting his or her annual salary or non-equity
cash incentive payments. None of the members of the Compensation
Committee is a current or former officer or employee of our
Company, and there were no interlocking relationships as defined
by the SEC, involving our executive officers, our directors, and
other entities with which our directors or executive officers
are associated.
20
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information about shares that may
be issued under the 2004 Plan and the 2010 Plan as of
April 3, 2011. We do not have any other equity compensation
plans required to be included in this table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities to Be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued upon
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
Under Equity
|
Plan Category
|
|
and Rights
|
|
and Rights ($)
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(a)
|
|
|
131,997
|
|
|
|
17.82
|
|
|
|
1,040,777
|
(b)(c)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We maintain two plans that were approved by our shareholders,
the 2004 Omnibus Stock Plan and the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Both plans allow awards in the form of restricted or
unrestricted stock, incentive or non-statutory stock options,
stock appreciation rights, performance-based restricted stock
units or other stock-based awards. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes securities available for future issuance under the 2010
Plan. There is no limit on the portion of the
1,040,777 shares of common stock available for distribution
under this plan that may be awarded in the form of restricted or
unrestricted stock. |
|
(c) |
|
Does not include 33,321 shares of restricted stock which
were issuable upon vesting of outstanding performance-based
restricted stock unit awards as of April 3, 2011. |
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
The following table contains information as of June 1, 2011
(except as otherwise noted below) concerning the beneficial
ownership of our common stock by all directors, the named
executive officers, all directors and executive officers as a
group and shareholders known by us to beneficially own more than
5% of our common stock. Unless otherwise noted, the address for
each shareholder listed below is our executive offices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Percent of
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Owned(a)
|
|
Shares
|
|
Trustees, Hawkins, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust
|
|
|
1,262,730
|
(b)
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
Royce & Associates, LLC
|
|
|
727,344
|
(c)
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
677,021
|
(d)
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
James A. Faulconbridge
|
|
|
5,272
|
(e)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Patrick H. Hawkins
|
|
|
31,733
|
(f)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Duane M. Jergenson
|
|
|
19,293
|
(g)
|
|
|
*
|
|
John S. McKeon
|
|
|
33,122
|
(g)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Daryl I. Skaar
|
|
|
8,807
|
(g)
|
|
|
*
|
|
James T. Thompson
|
|
|
2,166
|
(g)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jeffrey L. Wright
|
|
|
2,166
|
(g)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard G. Erstad
|
|
|
8,269
|
(h)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Keenan A. Paulson
|
|
|
55,536
|
(i)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kathleen P. Pepski
|
|
|
20,223
|
(j)
|
|
|
*
|
|
John R. Sevenich
|
|
|
46,298
|
(k)
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and officers as a group (14 persons)
|
|
|
281,504
|
(l)
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than one percent. |
|
(a) |
|
Unless otherwise noted, all shares shown are held by
shareholders possessing sole voting and investment power with
respect to such shares. |
21
|
|
|
(b) |
|
The Trustee of the Hawkins, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
and Trust is Charles Schwab Trust Company. The ESOP allows
plan participants to direct voting of shares allocated to their
plan accounts and all shares held by the ESOP are allocated to
plan participant accounts. Under the applicable trust agreement,
the Trustee is to vote shares with respect to which no voting
instructions are received from plan participants in proportion
to the shares voted by plan participants who do submit voting
instructions. As a result, the Trustee may theoretically be
deemed to share, at least temporarily, voting power for all
shares of the ESOP. The Trustee also has limited dispositive
power with respect to all shares of the ESOP, reflecting a
requirement that the assets of the ESOP must primarily consist
of shares of Hawkins stock. The Trustee disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares attributed to it in its
capacity as Trustee of the ESOP. |
|
(c) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Royce &
Associates, LLC with the SEC on January 13, 2011. The
address for Royce & Associates is 745 Fifth
Avenue, New York, NY 10151. |
|
(d) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed by T. Rowe Price Associates,
Inc. with the SEC on February 12, 2011. The address for T.
Rowe Price Associates, Inc. is 100 E. Pratt Street,
Baltimore, MD 21202. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes 1,550 shares that Mr. Faulconbridge holds
jointly with his wife as to which he shares voting and
investment power and 1,166 shares of restricted stock,
which shares vest and the related restrictions expire on
July 28, 2011. |
|
(f) |
|
Includes 11,802 shares representing the beneficial interest
of Mr. Hawkins as of May 23, 2011 in our ESOP and
7,417 shares of restricted stock, which shares vest and the
related restrictions expire on April 3, 2013. Does not
include outstanding Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit
Awards. |
|
(g) |
|
Includes 1,166 shares of restricted stock, which shares
vest and the related restrictions expire on July 28, 2011. |
|
(h) |
|
Consist of 3,500 shares of restricted stock, which shares
vest and the related restrictions expire on March 12, 2012
and 4,769 shares of restricted stock, which shares vest and
the related restrictions expire on April 3, 2013. Does not
include outstanding Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit
Awards. |
|
(i) |
|
Includes 36,179 shares representing the beneficial interest
of Ms. Paulson as of May 23, 2011 in our ESOP,
9,333 shares covered by options exercisable within
60 days granted to Ms. Paulson, 1,167 shares of
restricted stock, which shares vest and the related restrictions
expire on March 28, 2012 and 4,981 shares of
restricted stock, which shares vest and the related restrictions
expire on April 3, 2013. Does not include outstanding
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards. |
|
(j) |
|
Includes 9,333 shares covered by options exercisable within
60 days granted to Ms. Pepski, 3,500 shares of
restricted stock, which shares vest and the related restrictions
expire on March 28, 2012, and 5,086 shares of
restricted stock, which shares vest and the related restrictions
expire on April 3, 2013. Does not include outstanding
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards. |
|
(k) |
|
Includes 26,675 shares representing the beneficial interest
of Mr. Sevenich as of May 23, 2011 in our ESOP,
9,333 shares covered by options exercisable within
60 days granted to Mr. Sevenich, 3,500 shares of
restricted stock, which shares vest and the related restrictions
expire on March 28, 2012, and 4,493 shares of
restricted stock, which shares vest and the related restrictions
expire on April 3, 2013. Does not include outstanding
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards. |
|
(l) |
|
Includes 108,352 shares representing the beneficial
interest of the directors and officers as of May 23, 2011
in our ESOP. Does not include outstanding Performance-Based
Restricted Stock Unit Awards. |
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires our executive officers, directors and persons who
beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock to
file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in
ownership of our common stock with the SEC. Executive officers,
directors and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent
of our common stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish
us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based
solely on a review of the copies of such
22
forms furnished to us, and written representations from our
executive officers and directors, all Section 16(a) filing
requirements applicable to our executive officers and directors
have been satisfied.
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We employ Michael Clemens and John Clemens, the brothers of
Theresa R. Moran, our Vice President Quality and
Support; and Daniel Paulson, the son of Keenan A. Paulson, our
Vice President Water Treatment Group. Including
retirement plan contributions and bonuses, each such employee
earned in excess of $120,000 in fiscal 2011.
The Audit Committee Charter provides that the Audit Committee is
responsible for approving all related party transactions. The
Audit Committee reviews and ratifies all transactions involving
our Company and any director, nominee for director, executive
officer, other employee or family member thereof on a quarterly
basis. It is our intention that these transactions will be on
terms no less favorable to us than we could obtain from
unaffiliated third parties.
PROPOSAL TWO
APPROVAL OF EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
On January 27, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the
adoption of a new Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
ESPP), subject to shareholder approval. The approval
of this ESPP will authorize 300,000 shares of our common
stock for issuance over the term of the ESPP.
The ESPP offers eligible employees the opportunity to acquire a
stock ownership interest in the Company through periodic payroll
deductions that are applied toward the purchase of shares of our
common stock at a discount from the then-current market price.
The full text of the ESPP as proposed to be ratified is
contained in Appendix A to this proxy statement. The
significant features of the ESPP are summarized below. Effective
in April 2011, the Companys previous Employee Stock
Purchase Plan was discontinued.
Administration
The ESPP is administered by the Compensation Committee. The
Committee has full authority to adopt rules and procedures to
administer the ESPP, to interpret the provisions of the ESPP, to
determine the terms and conditions of offerings under the ESPP,
to designate which of our subsidiaries may participate in the
ESPP. All costs and expenses incurred for ESPP administration
are paid by our Company.
Securities
Subject to the ESPP
An aggregate of 300,000 shares of our common stock have
been reserved for issuance under the ESPP. The shares are to be
made available from authorized but unissued shares of our common
stock. Any shares issued under the ESPP will reduce, on a
one-for-one
basis, the number of shares available for subsequent issuance
under the ESPP. In the event of any change to our outstanding
common stock, such as a recapitalization, stock split or similar
event, appropriate adjustments will be made to the number and
class of shares available under the ESPP and to the number,
class and purchase price of shares subject to each outstanding
purchase right.
Eligibility
and Participation
Any individual employed by the Company or any participating
subsidiary corporation (including any corporation which
subsequently becomes such at any time during the term of the
ESPP) who has completed at least 90 days of employment by
the Company or a designated affiliate and who is customarily
expected to work at least five months in any calendar year is
eligible to participate in the ESPP. As of June 10, 2011,
we estimate that approximately 310 employees, including our
five named executive officers, were eligible to participate in
the ESPP. Eligible employees may enroll in the ESPP and begin
participating at the start of any purchase period.
23
Purchase
Periods and Purchase Dates
Shares of common stock will be offered under the ESPP through a
series of offerings, each of which consists of a single purchase
period of six months, or such other duration (up to
27 months) as the Committee may prescribe. If our
shareholders approve this Proposal, we expect that our shares
will be offered under the ESPP through a series of successive
six-month purchase periods that are expected to commence on the
first day of January and July each year. Purchases under the
ESPP are expected to occur on the last trading day of June and
December each year.
Purchase
Price
The purchase price of our common stock acquired on each purchase
date will be no less than 85% of the lower of (i) the
closing market price per share of our common stock on the first
day of the applicable purchase period or (ii) the closing
market price per share of our common stock on the purchase date
at the end of the applicable six-month purchase period.
The closing market price of our common stock on any relevant
date under the ESPP will be deemed to be equal to the closing
selling price per share on such date on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market. The closing sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market on June 10, 2011 was $34.29 per share.
Payroll
Deductions and Stock Purchases
Each participant may elect to have an amount of eligible
compensation of at least $10.00 and not more than $1,000.00 with
held as a payroll deduction per pay period (up to a maximum of
500 shares each purchase period). The accumulated
deductions will automatically be applied on each purchase date
to the purchase of shares of our common stock at the purchase
price in effect for that purchase date. For purposes of the
ESPP, eligible compensation generally includes base salary,
bonuses, commissions and overtime pay, and excludes allowances
and income with respect to equity-based awards.
Special
Limitations
The ESPP imposes certain limitations upon a participants
right to acquire our common stock, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase rights may not be granted to any individual who owns
stock (including stock purchasable under any outstanding
purchase rights) possessing 5% or more of the total combined
voting power or value of all classes of our stock or the stock
of any of our subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
A participant may not be granted rights to purchase more than
$25,000 worth of our common stock (valued at the time each
purchase right is granted) for each calendar year in which such
purchase rights are outstanding.
|
|
|
|
No participant may purchase more than 500 shares of our
common stock on any one purchase date.
|
Termination
or Modification of Purchase Rights
A participant may withdraw from the ESPP at any time, and his or
her accumulated payroll deductions will be promptly refunded. A
participant may also increase or decrease the amount of his or
her payroll deductions once per purchase period. A
participants purchase right will immediately terminate
upon his or her cessation of employment for any reason. Any
payroll deductions that the participant may have made for the
purchase period in which such cessation of employment occurs
will be refunded and will not be applied to the purchase of
common stock.
Shareholder
Rights
No participant will have any shareholder rights with respect to
the shares covered by his or her purchase rights until the
shares are actually purchased on the participants behalf
through the ESPP.
24
Transferability
No purchase rights will be assignable or transferable by the
participant, except by will or the laws of inheritance following
a participants death. Shares of common stock purchased
through the ESPP by a participant may not be sold by the
participant prior to three months and a day after the purchase
date of the shares.
Corporate
Transactions
If our Company is acquired by merger or through the sale of all
or substantially all its assets, the Board of Directors may
provide that (i) each right to acquire shares on any
purchase date scheduled to occur after the date of the
consummation of the acquisition transaction shall be continued
or assumed or an equivalent right shall be substituted by the
surviving or successor corporation or its parent or subsidiary,
(ii) the ESPP shall be terminated, or (iii) the
purchase period then in progress shall be shortened by setting a
new purchase date.
Share
Proration
Should the total number of shares of common stock to be
purchased pursuant to outstanding purchase rights on any
particular purchase date exceed the number of shares remaining
available for issuance under the ESPP at that time, then the
Committee will make a pro-rata allocation of the available
shares on a uniform and nondiscriminatory basis, and the payroll
deductions of each participant not used to purchase shares will
be refunded.
Amendment
and Termination
The ESPP may be terminated at any time by the Board of
Directors, and will terminate upon the date on which all shares
remaining available for issuance under the ESPP are sold
pursuant to exercised purchase rights.
The Board of Directors may at any time amend or suspend the
ESPP. However, the Board of Directors may not, without
shareholder approval, amend the ESPP to (i) increase the
number of shares issuable under the ESPP or (ii) effect any
other change in the ESPP that would require shareholder approval
under applicable law or to maintain compliance with
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a summary of the principal United States
federal income tax consequences to the Company and to
participants subject to U.S. taxation with respect to
participation in the ESPP. This summary assumes the ESPP
qualifies as an employee stock purchase plan within
the meaning of Section 423 if the Internal Revenue Code, is
not intended to be exhaustive and does not discuss the income
tax laws of any city, state or foreign jurisdiction in which a
participant may reside.
Under a qualified Internal Revenue Code Section 423
arrangement, no taxable income will be recognized by a
participant, and no deductions will be allowed to the Company,
upon either the grant or the exercise of the purchase rights.
Taxable income will not be recognized until either there is a
sale or other disposition of the shares acquired under the ESPP
or in the event the participant should die while still owning
the purchased shares.
If a participant sells or otherwise disposes of the purchased
shares within two years after the first day of the purchase
period in which such shares were acquired, or within one year
after the actual purchase date of those shares, then the
participant will recognize ordinary income in the year of sale
or disposition equal to the amount by which the closing market
price of the shares on the purchase date exceeded the purchase
price paid for those shares, and the Company will be entitled to
an income tax deduction, for the taxable year in which such
disposition occurs, equal in amount to such excess. The
participant also will recognize a capital gain to the extent the
amount realized upon the sale of the shares exceeds the sum of
the aggregate purchase price for those shares and the ordinary
income recognized in connection with their acquisition.
25
If a participant sells or otherwise disposes of the purchased
shares more than two years after the first day of the purchase
period in which the shares were acquired and more than one year
after the actual purchase date of those shares, the participant
will recognize ordinary income in the year of sale or
disposition equal to the lower of (i) the amount by which
the selling price of the shares on the sale or disposition date
exceeded the purchase price paid for those shares or
(ii) 15% of the closing market price of the shares on the
first day of the purchase period in which the shares were
acquired. Any additional gain upon the disposition will be taxed
as a long-term capital gain. The Company will not be entitled to
an income tax deduction with respect to such disposition.
If a participant still owns the purchased shares at the time of
death, his or her estate will recognize ordinary income in the
year of death equal to the lower of (i) the amount by which
the closing market price of the shares on the date of death
exceeds the purchase price or (ii) 15% of the closing
market price of the shares on the first day of the purchase
period in which those shares were acquired.
Plan
Benefits
The benefits to be received by our executive officers and
employees as a result of the proposed ESPP are not determinable
because the amounts of future purchases by participants are
based on elective participant contributions.
Required
Vote
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of our common stock of the entitled to vote
on this item and present in person or by proxy at the Annual
Meeting is required for approval of this proposal, including the
ESPP and the shares authorized for issuance under the ESPP.
Proxies solicited by our Board of Directors will be voted for
approval of this proposal, unless otherwise specified. If
shareholder approval is not obtained, then the ESPP will remain
in effect under its current terms until the date our Board of
Directors terminates the ESPP.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR
THIS PROPOSAL TWO
PROPOSAL THREE
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
The Company seeks a non-binding advisory vote from its
shareholders to approve the compensation of our executive
officers as described in this proxy statement under
Executive Compensation and Compensation
Discussion and Analysis.
This proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express
their views on our executive officer compensation. Because your
vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board of
Directors. However, the Compensation Committee will take into
account the outcome of the vote when making future executive
officer compensation decisions.
Our executive compensation program has been designed to attract
and retain executives who will lead our Company to achieve
long-term success and growth in shareholder value. Consistent
with that goal, our executive compensation is based on Company,
business unit and individual performance and the alignment of
the interests of our executive officers with those of our
shareholders and is used to encourage our executive officers to
stay with the Company. Our executive compensation program
currently includes a mix of compensation elements that rewards
current results as well as motivates long-term performance
through an appropriate balance of base pay and performance-based
variable compensation. To incent appropriate performance, our
performance-based variable compensation consists of a short-term
variable pay component that significantly rewards executives for
both current business results as well as personal performance,
and a long-term incentive plan that motivates long-term
performance and aligns business results with the interests of
our shareholders.
26
We are presenting this proposal, which gives you as a
shareholder the opportunity to approve our executive officer
compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement by voting for
or against the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve the compensation of the
Companys executive officers, as disclosed in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables,
and the related disclosure contained in the Companys 2011
proxy statement.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS BELIEVES THAT THE COMPENSATION OF OUR
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS IS APPROPRIATE AND RECOMMENDS A VOTE
FOR THIS PROPOSAL THREE.
PROPOSAL FOUR
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF THE ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE
OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION PRACTICES
The Company seeks a non-binding advisory vote from its
shareholders to determine the frequency of the non-binding
advisory vote to approve the compensation of our executive
officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section and the tabular disclosure regarding named
executive officer compensation (together with the accompanying
narrative disclosure) in our annual proxy statements.
This proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express
their views as to whether the non-binding advisory vote on our
executive officer compensation practices should occur every one,
two, or three years. Because your vote is advisory, it will not
be binding upon the Board of Directors. However, the Board of
Directors will take into account the outcome of the vote when
deciding the frequency of the non-binding advisory approval of
our future executive officer compensation decisions.
We recommend that the frequency of this non-binding advisory
vote occur once every three years. Our Board reviewed the
alternatives to determine the approach that will best serve our
Company and our shareholders. Our Board has determined that an
advisory vote on executive compensation held every three years
would be the best approach for Hawkins based on a number of
considerations, including, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Our compensation program ties a substantial portion of the
compensation provided to our Named Executive Officers to our
long-term corporate performance. We believe that a triennial
vote will give our shareholders the opportunity to more fully
assess the success or failure of our long-term compensation
strategies and the related business outcomes with the hindsight
of three years of corporate performance; and
|
|
|
|
A three-year vote cycle allows sufficient time for our Board to
review and respond to shareholders views on executive
compensation and to implement changes, if necessary, to our
executive compensation program.
|
In the future we may determine that a more or less frequent
advisory vote is appropriate, either in response to the vote of
our shareholders on this Proposal Four or for other
reasons. While we believe our recommendation is appropriate at
this time, the shareholders are not voting to approve or
disapprove our recommendation, but are instead asked to provide
an advisory vote on whether the non-binding advisory vote on the
approval of our executive officer compensation practices should
be held every one, two or three years. The option among those
choices that obtains a plurality of votes cast by the shares
present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting will be deemed to have received the advisory
approval of our shareholders.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS AN ADVISORY VOTE FOR
3 YEARS FOR THIS PROPOSAL FOUR.
27
OTHER
MATTERS
Our management does not know of any other business that will be
presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If, however,
any other business does properly come before the Annual Meeting,
proxies will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the
person or persons acting under them as to what is in the best
interests of our Company.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, was
retained by the Audit Committee for fiscal 2011 and has been
retained by the Audit Committee as our auditor for fiscal 2012.
Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to attend the Annual
Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if
they desire to do so. They are expected to be available to
respond to appropriate questions.
PROPOSALS BY
SHAREHOLDERS
In order for a shareholder proposal to be considered for
inclusion in our proxy statement for next years annual
meeting of shareholders, the written proposal must be received
by us at our principal executive office no later than
February 23, 2012. Any such proposals also must comply with
all applicable requirements of Minnesota law and the rules and
regulations of the SEC regarding shareholder proposals. In order
for any other shareholder proposal to be properly brought before
next years annual meeting of shareholders, we must receive
a written notice at our principal executive office no later
than, May 4, 2012, in conformance with our By-Laws. The
persons named as proxies by us for that meeting will have
discretionary authority to vote on any shareholder proposal for
which such notice is not properly received by us and as
otherwise permitted pursuant to the SECs rules and
regulations regarding the voting of proxies. Any director
nominations made by shareholders also must comply with the
relevant provisions set forth in Article II of our By-laws,
as described under the Nominating Process section above. A copy
of our By-laws has been filed with the SEC and is available on
the SECs website (www.sec.gov) or may be obtained by
sending a written request to our Secretary at our executive
offices.
FORM 10-K
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for fiscal 2011, including financial statements, is being mailed
with this Proxy Statement. Shareholders who wish to obtain an
additional copy of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for fiscal 2010 may do so without charge by writing to:
Hawkins, Inc., 3100 East Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota
55413, Attention: Secretary. Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as well as other Company reports, are also available on the
SECs website (www.sec.gov).
28
APPENDIX A
HAWKINS,
INC.
EMPLOYEE
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
1. Purpose of the Plan. The purpose
of this Hawkins, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
Plan) is to provide the employees of Hawkins, Inc.
(the Company) and its participating subsidiaries
with a convenient means of purchasing shares of the
Companys common stock from time to time at a discount to
market prices through the use of payroll deductions. The Company
intends that the Plan shall qualify as an employee stock
purchase plan under Section 423 of the Code.
2. Definitions. The terms defined
in this section are used (and capitalized) elsewhere in this
Plan.
2.1. Affiliate means each
domestic or foreign corporation that is a parent
corporation or subsidiary corporation of the
Company, as defined in Code Sections 424(e) and 424(f) or
any successor provisions.
2.2 Board means the Board of
Directors of the Company.
2.3 Code means the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and the
regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.4 Committee means the
Compensation Committee of the Board or such other committee of
non-employee directors appointed by the Board to administer the
Plan as provided in Section 13.
2.5 Common Stock means the common
stock, par value $.05 per share, of the Company.
2.6 Company means Hawkins, Inc.,
a Minnesota corporation.
2.7 Corporate Transaction means
(i) a merger, consolidation or statutory share exchange in
which the Company is not the continuing or surviving corporation
(other than a merger involving the Company in which the
shareholders of the Company immediately prior to the merger have
the same proportionate ownership interest in the outstanding
voting stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the
merger), or (ii) the sale of substantially all of the
assets of the Company.
2.8 Designated Affiliate means
any Affiliate which has been expressly designated by the Board
or Committee as a corporation whose Eligible Employees may
participate in the Plan.
2.9 Eligible Compensation means
the gross cash compensation (including wages, salary,
commission, bonus, and overtime earnings) paid by the Company or
any Affiliate to a Participant in accordance with the
Participants terms of employment, but shall not include
any employer contributions to a 401(k) or other retirement plan,
stock option gains or other any amount included in income with
respect to equity-based incentive awards, or any similar
extraordinary remuneration received by such Participant.
2.10 Eligible Employee means any
employee of the Company or a Designated Affiliate who has
completed at least 90 days of employment with the Company
or a Designated Affiliate and whose customary employment with
the Company or a Designated Affiliate is for more than five
months in any calendar year, except for any employee who,
immediately after a right to purchase is granted under the Plan,
would be deemed, for purposes of Code Section 423(b)(3), to
own stock possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting
power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or any
Affiliate.
2.11 Exchange Act means the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time,
and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.12 Fair Market Value of a share
of Common Stock as of any date means (i) if the
Companys Common Stock is then listed on a national
securities exchange, the closing price for a share of such
Common Stock on such exchange on said date, or, if no sale has
been made on such exchange on said date, on the last preceding
day on which any sale shall have been made; or (ii) if the
Companys Common Stock is not then listed on a national
securities exchange, such value as the Committee in its
A-1
discretion may in good faith determine. The determination of
Fair Market Value shall be subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 14.1.
2.13 Offering means the right
provided to Participants to purchase Shares under the Plan with
respect to a Purchase Period.
2.14 Participant means an
Eligible Employee who has elected to participate in the Plan in
the manner set forth in Section 4 and whose participation
has not ended pursuant to Section 8.1 or Section 9.
2.15 Plan means this Hawkins,
Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as it may be amended from
time to time.
2.16 Purchase Date means the last
Trading Day of a Purchase Period.
2.17 Purchase Period means a
period of six months beginning either (i) on January 1 of
each calendar year and ending on the next June 30, or
(ii) on July 1 in each calendar year and ending on the next
December 31, or such other period of time (but not to
exceed 27 months or such longer period as may be permitted
under Code Section 423) as may be established by the
Committee.
2.18 Recordkeeping Account means
the account maintained in the books and records of the Company
recording the amount contributed to the Plan by each Participant
through payroll deductions.
2.19 Shares means shares of
Common Stock.
2.20 Trading Day means a day on
which the national stock exchanges in the United States are open
for trading.
3. Shares Available. Shares
may be sold by the Company to Eligible Employees at any time
after this Plan has been approved by the shareholders of the
Company, but not more than 300,000 Shares (subject to
adjustment as provided in Section 14.1) may be sold to
Eligible Employees pursuant to this Plan. If the purchases by
all Participants in an Offering would otherwise cause the
aggregate number of Shares to be sold under the Plan to exceed
the number specified in this Section 3.1, each Participant
in that Offering shall be allocated a ratable portion of the
remaining number of Shares which may be sold under the Plan.
4. Eligibility and
Participation. To be eligible to participate in
the Plan for a given Purchase Period, an employee must be an
Eligible Employee on the first day of such Purchase Period. An
Eligible Employee may elect to participate in the Plan by filing
an election form with the Company before the first day of a
Purchase Period that authorizes regular payroll deductions from
Eligible Compensation beginning with the first payroll period
ending on or after the first day of such Purchase Period and
continuing until the Plan is terminated or the Eligible Employee
withdraws from the Plan, modifies his or her authorization, or
ceases to be an Eligible Employee, as hereinafter provided.
5. Amount of Common Stock Each Eligible Employee
May Purchase.
5.1. Subject to the provisions of this Plan, each
Participant shall be offered the right to purchase on the
Purchase Date the maximum number of whole Shares that can be
purchased with the balance in the Participants
Recordkeeping Account at the per Share price specified in
Section 5.2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Participant
shall be entitled to:
(a) the right to purchase Shares under this Plan and all
other employee stock purchase plans (within the meaning of Code
Section 423(b)), if any, of the Company and its Affiliates
that accrues at a rate which in the aggregate exceeds $25,000 of
Fair Market Value (determined on the first day of a Purchase
Period when the right is granted) for each calendar year in
which such right is outstanding at any time; or
(b) purchase more than 500 Shares in any Offering
under this Plan, such limit subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 14.1.
5.2. Unless a greater purchase price is established by the
Committee for an Offering prior to the commencement of the
applicable Purchase Period, the purchase price of each Share
sold pursuant to this Plan
A-2
will be the lesser of (i) 85% of the Fair Market Value of
such Share on the first day of the applicable Purchase Period,
or (ii) 85% of the Fair Market Value of such Share on the
last day of the Purchase Period.
6. Method of Participation.
6.1. The Company shall give notice to each Eligible
Employee of the opportunity to purchase Shares pursuant to this
Plan and the terms and conditions of such Offering. The Company
contemplates that for tax purposes the first day of a Purchase
Period will be the date of the grant of the right to purchase of
such Shares.
6.2. Each Eligible Employee who desires to participate in
the Plan for a Purchase Period shall signify his or her election
to do so by signing and filing with the Company an election form
approved by the Committee. An Eligible Employee may elect to
have an amount of Eligible Compensation of at least $10.00 and
not more than $1,000.00 withheld as a payroll deduction per pay
period. An election to participate in the Plan and to authorize
payroll deductions as described herein must be made before the
first day of a Purchase Period. The election shall be effective
for the first payroll period that ends on or after the first day
of the Purchase Period immediately following the filing of such
election form and shall remain in effect until the Plan is
terminated or such Participant withdraws from the Plan, modifies
his or her authorization, or ceases to be an Eligible Employee,
as hereinafter provided.
6.3. Each Offering shall consist of a single Purchase
Period and shall be in such form and shall contain such terms
and conditions as the Committee shall deem appropriate,
consistent with the terms of the Plan. The Committee may provide
for separate Offerings for different Designated Affiliates, and
the terms and conditions of the separate Offerings, including
the applicable Purchase Period, need not be consistent. Any
Offering shall comply with the requirement of Code
Section 423 that all Participants shall have the same
rights and privileges for such Offering. The terms and
conditions of any Offering shall be incorporated by reference
into the Plan and treated as part of the Plan.
7. Recordkeeping Account.
7.1. The Company shall maintain a Recordkeeping Account for
each Participant. Payroll deductions pursuant to Section 6
will be credited to such Recordkeeping Accounts on each payday.
7.2. No interest will be credited to a Participants
Recordkeeping Account (unless required under local law).
7.3. The Recordkeeping Account is established solely for
accounting purposes, and all amounts credited to the
Recordkeeping Account will remain part of the general assets of
the Company and need not be segregated from other corporate
funds (unless required under local law).
7.4. A Participant may not make any separate cash payment
into a Recordkeeping Account, except as may be permitted by the
Committee in accordance with Section 6.2.
8. Right to Adjust Participation; Withdrawals from
Recordkeeping Account.
8.1. A Participant may at any time withdraw from the Plan.
If a Participant withdraws from the Plan, the Company will pay
to the Participant in cash the entire balance in such
Participants Recordkeeping Account and no further
deductions will be made from the Participants Eligible
Compensation during such Purchase Period. A Participant who
withdraws from the Plan will not be eligible to reenter the Plan
until the next succeeding Purchase Period, and any such reentry
shall be through the enrollment process described in
Section 6.2.
8.2. Except for a withdrawal from the Plan as provided in
Section 8.1, a Participant may only increase or decrease
the deductions from his or her Eligible Compensation as of the
first pay period in any Purchase Period.
8.3. Notification of a Participants election (i)
to withdraw from the Plan and terminate deductions or
(ii) to increase or decrease deductions shall be made by
signing and filing with the Company an appropriate form approved
by the Committee. The Committee may promulgate rules regarding
the time and manner for
A-3
providing any such written notice, which may include a
requirement that the notice be on file with the Companys
designated office for a reasonable period before it will be
effective.
9. Termination of Employment. If
the employment of a Participant is terminated for any reason,
including death, disability, or retirement, the entire balance
in the Participants Recordkeeping Account will be refunded
in cash to the Participant within 30 days after the date of
termination of employment. For purposes of the Plan, a
Participant will not be deemed to have terminated employment
while the Participant is on sick leave, military leave or other
leave of absence approved by the Company. Where the period of
leave exceeds 90 days and the Employees right to
reemployment is not guaranteed either by statute or by contract,
the employment relationship shall be deemed to have terminated
on the ninety-first day of such leave.
10. Purchase of Shares.
10.1. As of the Purchase Date, the balance in each
Participants Recordkeeping Account will be used to
purchase the maximum number of whole Shares (subject to the
limitations of Section 5.1) at the purchase price
determined in accordance with Section 5.2, unless the
Participant has filed an appropriate form with the Company in
advance of that date to withdraw from the Plan in accordance
with Section 8.1. Any amount in a Participants
Recordkeeping Account that is not used to purchase Shares
pursuant to this Section 10.1 will be refunded to the
Participant unless the unused amount is less than the amount
necessary to purchase a whole Share. In that case, the unused
amount will be retained in the Participants Recordkeeping
Account and carried forward into the next Purchase Period
(unless the Participant will not be a Participant during the
next Purchase Period).
10.2. Promptly after the end of each Purchase Period, a
certificate for the number of Shares purchased by all
Participants shall be issued and delivered to an agent selected
by the Company. The agent will hold such certificate for the
benefit of all Participants who have purchased Shares and will
maintain an account for each Participant reflecting the number
of whole Shares credited to the account of each Participant.
Each Participant will be entitled to direct the voting of all
Shares credited to such Participants account by the agent.
Each Participant may also direct such agent to sell such Shares
and distribute the net proceeds of such sale to the Participant.
At any time after the Participant has satisfied the minimum
holding period requirements established by Code
Section 423(a)(1), a Participant may request from the agent
a certificate representing the Shares credited to the
Participants account, in which case the agent shall
transfer a certificate for such whole number of Shares directly
to the Participant.
11. Rights as a Shareholder. A
Participant shall not be entitled to any of the rights or
privileges of a shareholder of the Company with respect to
Shares, including the right to vote or direct the voting or to
receive any dividends that may be declared by the Company, until
(i) the Participant actually has paid the purchase price
for such Shares and (ii) certificates for such Shares have
been issued either to the agent or to the Participant, as
provided in Section 10.
12. Rights Not Transferable. A
Participants rights under this Plan are exercisable only
by the Participant during his or her lifetime, and may not be
sold, pledged, assigned, transferred or disposed of in any
manner other than by will or the laws of descent and
distribution. Any attempt to sell, pledge, assign, transfer or
dispose of the same shall be null and void and without effect.
The amounts credited to a Recordkeeping Account may not be sold,
pledged, assigned, transferred or disposed of in any way, and
any attempted sale, pledge, assignment, transfer or other
disposition of such amounts will be null and void and without
effect.
13. Administration of the Plan.
13.1. This Plan shall be administered by the Committee.
Subject to the express provisions of the Plan and applicable
law, and in addition to other express powers and authorizations
conferred on the Committee by the Plan, the Committee shall have
full power and authority to:
(a) Determine when each Purchase Period under this Plan
shall occur, and the terms and conditions of each related
Offering (which need not be identical);
(b) Designate from time to time which Affiliates of the
Company shall be eligible to participate in the Plan;
A-4
(c) Construe and interpret the Plan and establish, amend
and revoke rules, regulations and procedures for the
administration of the Plan. The Committee may, in the exercise
of this power, correct any defect, omission or inconsistency in
the Plan, in such manner and to the extent it may deem
necessary, desirable or appropriate to make the Plan fully
effective;
(d) Exercise such powers and perform such acts as the
Committee may deem necessary, desirable or appropriate to
promote the best interests of the Company and its Designated
Affiliates and to carry out the intent that the Offerings made
under the Plan are treated as qualifying under Code
Section 423(b); and
(e) As more fully described in Section 19, to adopt
such rules, procedures and
sub-plans as
may be necessary, desirable or appropriate to permit
participation in the Plan by employees who are foreign nationals
or employed outside the United States by a
non-U.S. Designated
Affiliate, and to achieve tax, securities law and other
compliance objectives in particular locations outside the United
States.
13.2. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan, all
designations, determinations, interpretations, and other
decisions under or with respect to the Plan shall be within the
sole discretion of the Committee, may be made at any time and
shall be final, conclusive, and binding upon all persons,
including the Company, any Affiliate, any Participant and any
Eligible Employee.
13.3. Subject to the terms of the Plan and applicable law,
the Committee may delegate ministerial duties associated with
the administration of the Plan to such of the Companys
officers, employees or agents as the Committee may determine.
13.4. No member of the Board or Committee shall be liable
for any action taken or determination made in good faith with
respect to the Plan. In addition to such other rights of
indemnification as they may have as members of the Board or
officers or employees of the Company or a Designated Affiliate,
members of the Board and Committee and any officers or employees
of the Company or Designated Affiliate to whom authority to act
for the Committee is delegated shall be indemnified by the
Company from and against any and all liabilities, costs and
expenses incurred by such persons as a result of any act or
omission to act in connection with the performance of such
persons duties, responsibilities and obligations under the
Plan if such person has acted in good faith and in a manner that
he or she reasonably believes to be in, or not opposed to, the
best interests of the Company.
14. Adjustment upon Changes in Capitalization and
Corporate Transactions.
14.1. In the event of any change in the Common Stock of the
Company by reason of a stock dividend, stock split, reverse
stock split, corporate separation, recapitalization, merger,
consolidation, combination, exchange of shares and the like, the
Committee shall make such equitable adjustments as it deems
appropriate in the aggregate number and class of shares
available under this Plan and the number, class and purchase
price of shares available but not yet purchased under this Plan.
14.2. In the event of a Corporate Transaction, the Board
may determine and provide that: (i) each right to acquire
Shares on any Purchase Date that is scheduled to occur after the
date of the consummation of the Corporate Transaction shall be
continued or assumed or an equivalent right shall be substituted
by the surviving or successor corporation or a parent or
subsidiary of such corporation; or (ii) the Purchase Period
then in progress shall be shortened by setting a new Purchase
Date. If a new Purchase Date is set, it shall be a specified
date before the date of the consummation of the Corporate
Transaction. Each Participant shall be notified in writing,
prior to any new Purchase Date, that the Purchase Date for the
existing Offering has been changed to the new Purchase Date and
that the Participants right to acquire Shares will be
exercised automatically on the new Purchase Date unless prior to
such date the Participants employment has been terminated
or the Participant has withdrawn from the Plan.
15. Registration of
Certificates. Stock certificates will be
registered in the name of the Participant, or jointly in the
name of the Participant and another person, as the Participant
may direct on an appropriate form filed with the Company or the
agent.
16. Amendment or Suspension of
Plan. The Board may at any time suspend this Plan
or amend it in any respect, but no such amendment may, without
shareholder approval, increase the number of shares
A-5
reserved under this Plan, or effect any other change in the Plan
that would require shareholder approval under applicable law or
to maintain compliance with Code Section 423. No such
amendment or suspension shall adversely affect the rights of
Participants pursuant to Shares previously acquired under the
Plan. During any suspension of the Plan, no new Offering or
Purchase Period shall begin and no Eligible Employee shall be
offered any new right to purchase Shares under the Plan or any
opportunity to elect to participate in the Plan, and any
existing payroll deduction authorizations shall be suspended,
but any such right to purchase Shares previously granted for a
Purchase Period that began prior to the Plan suspension shall
remain subject to the other provisions of this Plan and the
discretion of the Board and the Committee with respect thereto.
17. Effective Date and Term of
Plan. This Plan shall be effective on
April 4, 2011, subject to approval of the Plan by the
Companys shareholders within 12 months of such date.
The Plan and all rights of Participants hereunder shall
terminate (i) at any time, at the discretion of the Board
of Directors, or (ii) upon the completion of any Offering
under which the limitation on the total number of shares to be
issued set forth in Section 3 has been reached. Except as
otherwise determined by the Board, upon termination of this
Plan, the Company shall pay to each Participant cash in an
amount equal to the entire remaining balance in such
Participants Recordkeeping Account.
18. Governmental Regulations and
Listing. All rights granted or to be granted to
Eligible Employees under this Plan are expressly subject to all
applicable laws and regulations and to the approval of all
governmental authorities required in connection with the
authorization, issuance, sale or transfer of the Shares reserved
for this Plan, including, without limitation, there being a
current registration statement of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, covering the Shares
purchasable on the Purchase Date applicable to such Shares, and
if such a registration statement shall not then be effective,
the term of such Purchase Period shall be extended until the
first business day after the effective date of such a
registration statement, or post-effective amendment thereto. If
applicable, all such rights hereunder are also similarly subject
to effectiveness of an appropriate listing application to a
national securities exchange covering the Shares issuable under
the Plan upon official notice of issuance.
19. Rules for Foreign
Jurisdictions. The Committee may adopt rules,
procedures or subplans relating to the operation and
administration of the Plan to accommodate the specific
requirements of local laws and procedures. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the Committee is specifically
authorized to adopt rules and procedures regarding handling of
payroll deductions, payment of interest, conversion of local
currency, payroll tax, the definition of Eligible Compensation,
withholding procedures and handling of stock certificates which
vary with local requirements.
20. Miscellaneous.
20.1. This Plan shall not be deemed to constitute a
contract of employment between the Company and any Participant,
nor shall it interfere with the right of the Company to
terminate any Participant and treat him or her without regard to
the effect which such treatment might have upon him or her under
this Plan.
20.2. Wherever appropriate as used herein, the masculine
gender may be read as the feminine gender, the feminine gender
may be read as the masculine gender, the singular may be read as
the plural and the plural may be read as the singular.
20.3. This Plan, and all agreements hereunder, shall be
construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
20.4. Any reference in the Plan to election or enrollment
forms, notices, authorizations or any other document to be
provided in writing shall include any such form, notice,
authorization or document delivered electronically, including
through the Companys intranet, in accordance with
procedures established by the Committee.
20.5. Any reference in this Plan to the issuance or
transfer of a stock certificate evidencing Shares shall be
deemed to include, in the Committees discretion, the
issuance or transfer of such Shares in book-entry or electronic
form. Uncertificated Shares shall be deemed delivered for all
purposes of this Plan when the Company or its agent shall have
provided to the recipient of the Shares a notice of issuance or
transfer by electronic mail (with proof of receipt) or by United
States mail, and have recorded the issuance or transfer in its
records.
A-6
HAWKINS, INC.ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERSTuesday, August 2, 20113:00 p.m., Central
TimeMidland Hills Country Club2001 Fulham St.Roseville, MinnesotaHAWKINS, INC.3100 East Hennepin
AvenueMinneapolis, Minnesota 55413The following proxy materials and information are available for
your review at www.ezodproxy.com/hawkinsinc/2011 the Companys Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy
Statement; the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2011; the
form of Proxy Card; the Letter to Shareholders; and directions to the Annual Meeting.This proxy
is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on August 2,
2011.The shares of stock you hold in your account or in a dividend reinvestment account will be
voted as you specify on the reverse side.If no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted FOR
Items 1 through 9 and 3 years for item 10.By signing the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and
appoint Patrick H. Hawkins, Kathleen P. Pepski and Richard G. Erstad, and each of them, with full
power of substitution, to vote your shares on the matters shown on the reverse side and any other
matters that may come before the Annual Meeting and all adjournments.proxyImportant
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be
Held on August 2, 2011.The Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available
at:www.ezodproxy.com/hawkinsinc/2011 See reverse for voting instructions. |
Shareowner
Services ; Box 64945St. Paul, MN 55164-0945COMPANY
#Address Change? Mark box, sign, and indicate changes below:Vote by Internet, Telephone or
Mail24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a WeekYour phone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to
vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.INTERNET
www.eproxy.com/hwknUse the Internet to vote your proxy until 11:59 p.m. on August 1, 2011.PHONE
1-800-560-1965Use a touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy until 11:59 p.m. on August 1,
2011.Mail Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope
provided.If you vote your proxy by Internet or by Telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your
Proxy Card.TO VOTE BY MAIL AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS ON ALL ITEMS BELOW,SIMPLY
SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD.Please detach here The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote
FOR Items 1 through 9 and 3 years for Item 10.Election of directors: FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN FOR
AGAINST ABSTAIN1. John S. McKeon 5. Daryl I. Skaar2. Patrick H. Hawkins 6. James T. Thompson3.
James A. Faulconbridge 7. Jeffrey L. Wright4. Duane M. Jergenson 8. Proposal to approve the
Hawkins, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan For ? Against ? Abstain9. Non-binding advisory vote on
executive compensation (say-on-pay) For ? Against ? AbstainThe Board of Directors recommends a
vote for 3 years:10. Non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of the vote on executive
compensation 1 Year ? 2 Years ?3 Years ? AbstainTHIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE
VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED AS THE BOARD RECOMMENDS.
Date Signature(s) in BoxPlease sign exactly as your name(s) appears on Proxy. If held in
joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and
authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer
signing the Proxy. |