e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-26844
RADISYS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
OREGON
|
|
93-0945232 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
5445 N.E. Dawson Creek Drive
Hillsboro, OR 97124
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(503) 615-1100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act) Yes þ No o
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of August 2, 2005: 20,187,195
RADISYS CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
RADISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
65,956 |
|
|
$ |
60,253 |
|
|
$ |
123,473 |
|
|
$ |
121,368 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
46,557 |
|
|
|
40,231 |
|
|
|
85,532 |
|
|
|
82,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
19,399 |
|
|
|
20,022 |
|
|
|
37,941 |
|
|
|
38,840 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
7,292 |
|
|
|
7,135 |
|
|
|
14,823 |
|
|
|
13,479 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
|
7,684 |
|
|
|
14,962 |
|
|
|
15,361 |
|
Intangible assets amortization |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
Restructuring and other charges (reversals) |
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
6,002 |
|
|
|
9,661 |
|
Loss on repurchase of convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
(1,049 |
) |
|
|
(1,069 |
) |
|
|
(2,475 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
3,498 |
|
|
|
4,675 |
|
|
|
7,037 |
|
|
|
8,478 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
$ |
3,507 |
|
|
$ |
5,151 |
|
|
$ |
6,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
19,982 |
|
|
|
18,826 |
|
|
|
19,882 |
|
|
|
18,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,620 |
|
|
|
23,833 |
|
|
|
24,548 |
|
|
|
23,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
RADISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
69,184 |
|
|
$ |
80,566 |
|
Short-term investments, net |
|
|
117,094 |
|
|
|
78,303 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
43,366 |
|
|
|
42,902 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
4,991 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
20,149 |
|
|
|
22,154 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
4,216 |
|
|
|
4,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
260,750 |
|
|
|
233,624 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
14,113 |
|
|
|
14,002 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
27,521 |
|
|
|
27,521 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
3,185 |
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
Long-term investments, net |
|
|
25,500 |
|
|
|
39,750 |
|
Long-term deferred tax assets |
|
|
22,781 |
|
|
|
23,224 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,579 |
|
|
|
2,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
357,429 |
|
|
$ |
345,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
36,172 |
|
|
$ |
31,585 |
|
Accrued wages and bonuses |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
5,626 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Accrued restructuring |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
7,459 |
|
|
|
7,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
50,067 |
|
|
|
46,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes, net |
|
|
97,213 |
|
|
|
97,148 |
|
Convertible subordinated notes, net |
|
|
8,776 |
|
|
|
9,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
105,989 |
|
|
|
107,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
156,056 |
|
|
|
154,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 20,145 and 19,655 shares
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 |
|
|
187,924 |
|
|
|
182,705 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
9,468 |
|
|
|
4,317 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
3,981 |
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
201,373 |
|
|
|
191,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
357,429 |
|
|
$ |
345,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
RADISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
translation |
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
adjustments(1) |
|
earnings |
|
Total |
|
income (2) |
Balances, December
31, 2004 |
|
|
19,655 |
|
|
$ |
182,705 |
|
|
$ |
4,211 |
|
|
$ |
4,317 |
|
|
$ |
191,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued pursuant to
benefit plans |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restricted stock
compensation |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock cancelled |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit associated
with stock-based benefit
plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Net income for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, June 30, 2005 |
|
|
20,145 |
|
|
$ |
187,924 |
|
|
$ |
3,981 |
|
|
$ |
9,468 |
|
|
$ |
201,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income, for
the six months ended June
30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income taxes are not provided for foreign currency translation adjustments. |
|
(2) |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, other comprehensive income amounted to $2.4 million
and consisted of the net income for the period of $2.6 million and net losses from translation
adjustments of $214 thousand. For the three months ended June 30, 2004, other comprehensive
income amounted to $3.3 million and consisted of the net income for the period of $3.5 million
and net losses from translation adjustments of $207 thousand. For the six months ended June
30, 2004, other comprehensive income amounted to $6.0 million and consisted of net income for
the period of $6.4 million and net losses from translation adjustments of $367 thousand. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
RADISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,151 |
|
|
$ |
6,355 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,022 |
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
Provision for inventory reserves |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
Non-cash restructuring charges (adjustments) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
Non-cash amortization of premium on investments |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Loss on early extinguishments of convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
Tax benefit of stock-based benefit plans |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
Other |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
(5,806 |
) |
Other receivables |
|
|
(2,183 |
) |
|
|
(2,627 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,609 |
|
|
|
4,252 |
|
Accrued restructuring |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
(1,664 |
) |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
502 |
|
Accrued wages and bonuses |
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
(1,211 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
14,212 |
|
|
|
10,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale or maturity of held-to-maturity investments |
|
|
41,500 |
|
|
|
31,130 |
|
Purchase of held-to-maturity investments |
|
|
(36,499 |
) |
|
|
(18,645 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of maturity of auction rate securities |
|
|
27,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of auction rate securities |
|
|
(56,950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(3,083 |
) |
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(27,661 |
) |
|
|
10,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early extinguishments of convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
(58,168 |
) |
Borrowings under revolving line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
Repayments on revolving line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,000 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
6,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
(51,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(11,382 |
) |
|
|
(30,618 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
80,566 |
|
|
|
149,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
69,184 |
|
|
$ |
119,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
RADISYS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Significant Accounting Policies
RadiSys Corporation (the Company) has adhered to the accounting policies set forth in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 in preparing the accompanying
interim Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of these statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
The financial information included herein reflects all normal recurring adjustments that are,
in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for interim periods.
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, there have been no changes to these
accounting policies.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts in prior years to conform to current year
presentation. These changes had no effect on previously reported results of operations or
shareholders equity.
Inventory Reserves
The Company records the provision for inventory reserves for estimated obsolete or
unmarketable inventories as the difference between the cost of inventories and the estimated net
realizable value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Factors
influencing the provision include: changes in demand, rapid technological changes, product life
cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing, and physical deterioration. If
actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management additional
provisions for inventory reserves may be required. The Companys estimate for the provision is
based on the assumption that the Companys customers comply with their current contractual
obligations. The Company provides long-life support to its customers and therefore the Company has
material levels of customer specific inventory. If the Companys customers experience a financial
hardship or if the Company experiences unplanned cancellations of customer contracts, the current
provision for the inventory reserves may be inadequate. Additionally, the Company may incur
additional expenses associated with any non-cancelable purchase obligations to our suppliers if
they provide customer-specific components.
Adverse Purchase Commitments
The Company is contractually obligated to reimburse its contract manufacturers for the cost of
excess inventory used in the manufacture of the Companys products, for which there is no
alternative use. As the Company continues to execute its strategy of increasing the level of
outsourced manufacturing the liability for adverse purchase commitments will become more
significant. Estimates for adverse purchase commitments are derived from reports received on a
quarterly basis from the Companys contract manufacturers. Increases to this liability are charged
to cost of goods sold. When and if the Company takes possession of inventory reserved for in this
liability, the liability is transferred from other liabilities to our excess and obsolete inventory
reserve. This liability, referred to as adverse purchase commitments, is provided for in other
accrued liabilities. Adverse purchase commitments amounted to $599 thousand and $485 thousand at
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Accrued Restructuring and Other Charges
In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 146 Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities. SFAS No. 146 requires that liabilities for costs associated with exit or disposal
activities be recognized and measured initially at fair value in the period in which the
liabilities are incurred. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 the Company recorded
non-severance related restructuring and other charges in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No.
146. Because the Company has a history of paying severance benefits, the cost of severance benefits
associated with a restructuring charge is recorded when such costs are probable and the amount can
be reasonably estimated.
7
Prior to the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded restructuring charges
including employee termination and related costs, costs related to leased facilities, losses on
impairment of fixed assets and capitalized software and other accounting and legal fees. Employee
termination and related costs were previously recorded in accordance with the provisions of
Emerging Issues Task Force No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination
Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity. For leased facilities that were vacated and
subleased, an amount equal to the total future lease obligations from the date of vacating the
premises through the expiration of the lease, net of any future sublease income, was recorded as a
part of restructuring charges.
Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations
In November 2002, the FASB issued FIN No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an
interpretation of SFAS No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. FIN No. 45
requires that a guarantor recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair
value of the obligation undertaken by issuing the guarantee and requires additional disclosures to
be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under
certain guarantees it has issued. The adoption of FIN No. 45 did not have a material effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations. The following is a summary of the agreements
that the Company has determined are within the scope of FIN No. 45.
As permitted under Oregon law, the Company has agreements whereby it indemnifies its officers,
directors and certain finance employees for certain events or occurrences while the officer,
director or employee is or was serving in such capacity at the request of the Company. The term of
the indemnification period is for the officers, directors or employees lifetime. The maximum
potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these
indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a Director and Officer insurance
policy that limits its exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts
paid. As a result of the Companys insurance policy coverage, management believes the estimated
fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has not
recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of June 30, 2005.
The Company enters into standard indemnification agreements in its ordinary course of
business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to
reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, generally
our business partners or customers, in connection with patent, copyright or other intellectual
property infringement claims by any third party with respect to our current products, as well as
claims relating to property damage or personal injury resulting from the performance of services by
us or our subcontractors. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to
make under these indemnification agreements is generally limited. Historically, our costs to defend
lawsuits or settle claims relating to such indemnity agreements have been minimal and accordingly
the estimated fair value of these agreements is immaterial.
The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time it recognizes
revenue. Products are generally sold with warranty coverage for a period of 24 months after
shipment. Parts and labor are covered under the terms of the warranty agreement. The workmanship of
our products produced by contract manufacturers is covered under warranties provided by the
contract manufacturer for a specific period of time ranging from 12 to 15 months. The warranty
provision is based on historical experience by product family. The Company engages in extensive
product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of
its components suppliers; however, ongoing failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs
incurred in correcting product failure, as well as specific product class failures out of the
Companys baseline experience affect the estimated warranty obligation. If actual product failure
rates, material usage or service delivery costs differ from estimates, revisions to the estimated
warranty liability would be required.
The following is a summary of the change in the Companys warranty liability for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Warranty liability balance, beginning of the period |
|
$ |
1,719 |
|
|
$ |
2,276 |
|
Product warranty accruals |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
Adjustments for payments made |
|
|
(1,560 |
) |
|
|
(1,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability balance, end of the period |
|
$ |
1,837 |
|
|
$ |
1,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
The warranty liability balance is included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. The Company offers fixed
price support or maintenance contracts to some customers. Revenues from fixed price support or
maintenance contracts were not significant to the Companys operations for the periods reported.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method
and provides pro forma disclosures of net income and net income per common share as if the fair
value method had been applied in measuring compensation expense. Equity instruments are granted to
employees, directors, and consultants in certain instances, as defined in the respective plan
agreements.
Had the Company accounted for these plans under the fair value method, net income and pro
forma net income per share would have been reported as follows (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net income |
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
$ |
3,507 |
|
|
$ |
5,151 |
|
|
$ |
6,355 |
|
Add: Stock-based
compensation
expense included in
reported net
income, net of
related tax effects |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
Deduct: Stock-based
compensation
expense determined
under fair value
method for all
awards, net of
related tax effects |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
(2,015 |
) |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
(3,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
1,771 |
|
|
$ |
1,712 |
|
|
$ |
3,724 |
|
|
$ |
3,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, the Company incurred $31 thousand
of stock-based compensation associated with the issuance of restricted stock. See note 10.
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, the Company incurred $356 thousand and
$533 thousand of stock-based compensation expense, respectively. The stock-based compensation
expense was associated with shares issued and to be issued pursuant to the Companys 1996 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). The Company incurred stock-based compensation expense because the
original number of ESPP shares approved by the shareholders were insufficient to meet employee
demand for an ESPP offering which was consummated in February 2003 and ended in August 2004. The
Company subsequently received shareholder approval for additional ESPP shares in May 2003. The
shares issued and to be issued in the February 2003 ESPP offering in excess of the original number
of ESPP shares approved at the beginning of the offering (the shortfall) triggers recognition of
stock-based compensation expense under the intrinsic value method. The shortfall amounted to 138
thousand and 149 thousand shares in May 2004 and August 2004, respectively.
The expense per share is calculated as the difference between 85% of the closing price of
RadiSys shares as quoted on NASDAQ on the date that additional ESPP shares were approved (May 2003)
and the February 2003 ESPP offering purchase price. Accordingly, the expense per share is
calculated as the difference between $8.42 and $5.48. The shortfall of shares is dependent on the
amount of contributions from participants enrolled in the February 2003 ESPP offering.
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
356 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign
Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (FSP 109-2),
provides guidance under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, with respect to recording the
potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the
Jobs Act) on income tax expense and deferred tax liabilities. The Jobs Act was enacted on October
22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period
of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of
foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. RadiSys expects to make its repatriation
determination by the end of fiscal 2005. Accordingly, as provided for in FSP 109-2, RadiSys has not
adjusted its tax expense or deferred tax liability to reflect the repatriation provisions of the
Jobs Act.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements
based on their fair values. The effective date for the Company is the beginning of the first fiscal
quarter of 2006. Effective November 12, 2004, RadiSys accelerated the vesting of all outstanding
stock options with an option price greater than $15.99 in anticipation of implementation of
Statement No. 123R. Such acceleration of vesting was done for the purpose of avoiding future
expense associated with any unvested stock options granted prior to the effective date of Statement
No. 123R. If we were to continue to use the fair value method currently used for reporting pro
forma disclosures of net income (loss) and net income (loss) per common share, we estimate a
reduction in stock-based compensation expense associated with the acceleration of approximately
$3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) regarding the
SECs interpretation of SFAS 123R and the valuation of share-based payments for public companies.
RadiSys is evaluating the requirements of SFAS 123R and SAB 107 and expects that the adoption of
SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 will have a material impact on RadiSys consolidated results of
operations and earnings per share. RadiSys has not yet determined the method of adoption or the
effect of adopting SFAS 123R, and it has not determined whether the adoption will result in amounts
that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123.
The following recent accounting pronouncements either did not have a material impact on
RadiSys results of operations and financial condition upon adoption or in the case of
pronouncements not yet effective it is anticipated that adoption will not have a material impact on
RadiSys results of operations and financial condition:
|
|
|
SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary AssetsAn Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29,
Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. |
|
|
|
|
FSP No. 106-2 (FSP 106-2), Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Medicare Act) |
|
|
|
|
FSP No. 46(R)-5, Implicit Variable Interests under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised
December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities |
|
|
|
|
FASB Interpretation No. 47 . Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 |
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory CostsAn Amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory
Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that
items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and re-handling costs be
recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of so abnormal
as stated in ARB No. 43. Additionally, SFAS 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production
overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities.
SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted
by RadiSys in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. RadiSys is currently evaluating the effect that the
adoption of SFAS 151 will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition
and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact.
Note 2 Investments
Short-term and long-term investments consisted of the following (in thousands):
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Short-term held-to-maturity investments,
including unamortized discount of $56 and
premium of $103, respectively |
|
$ |
26,544 |
|
|
$ |
17,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term available-for-sale investments |
|
$ |
90,550 |
|
|
$ |
61,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term held-to-maturity investments* |
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
39,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Long term investments were purchased at par value and therefore there is no discount or
premium associated with these investments. |
The Company invests excess cash in debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies,
those of high-quality corporate issuers and municipalities. The companys investments in the debt
instruments of municipalities primarily consist of investments in auction rate securities. Auction
rate securities have been classified as available-for-sale short-term investments.
Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses
are recorded, net of tax, as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. For
the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 the Company did not recognize any gains or losses on
the sales of available-for-sale investments as the fair value of these investments approximated
there carrying value. The Company incurred no unrealized gains or losses on investments classified
as available-for-sale as of June 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004. As of June 30, 2005, the Companys
long-term held-to-maturity investments had maturities ranging from 13 months to 14 months. The
Companys investment policy requires that the total investment portfolio, including cash and
investments, not exceed a maximum weighted-average maturity of 18 months. In addition, the policy
mandates that an individual investment must have a maturity of less than 36 months, with no more
than 20% of the total portfolio exceeding 24 months. As of June 30, 2005, the Company was in
compliance with its investment policy.
Note 3 Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables
Accounts receivable consists of trade accounts receivable. Accounts receivable balances
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Accounts receivable, gross |
|
$ |
44,247 |
|
|
$ |
43,790 |
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
43,366 |
|
|
$ |
42,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded no provisions for allowance for doubtful accounts during the six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the balance in other receivables was $4,991 thousand
and $2,808 thousand, respectively. Other receivables consists of non-trade receivables. There is no
revenue recorded associated with non-trade receivables. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
other receivables primarily consisted of receivables for the sale of inventory to the Companys
contract manufacturing partners. Sales to the Companys contract manufacturing partners are based
on terms and conditions similar to the terms offered to the Companys regular customers.
11
Note 4 Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Raw materials |
|
$ |
19,992 |
|
|
$ |
24,044 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
4,641 |
|
|
|
3,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,558 |
|
|
|
29,507 |
|
Less: inventory reserves |
|
|
(6,409 |
) |
|
|
(7,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
20,149 |
|
|
$ |
22,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded provision for
excess and obsolete inventory of $832 thousand and $785 thousand, respectively. During both the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded provision for excess and obsolete
inventory of $ 1.5 million.
The following is a summary of the change in the Companys excess and obsolete inventory
reserve for the six months ended June 30 , 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Inventory reserve balance, beginning of the quarter |
|
$ |
7,353 |
|
|
$ |
9,491 |
|
Usage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory scrapped |
|
|
(1,667 |
) |
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
Inventory consumed through sales |
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
(1,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal usage |
|
|
(2,419 |
) |
|
|
(3,135 |
) |
Reserve provision |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining reserve balance, end of the quarter |
|
$ |
6,409 |
|
|
$ |
7,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Goodwill
The Company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually. Additionally, the Company
assesses goodwill for impairment if any adverse conditions exist that would indicate an impairment.
Conditions that would trigger an impairment assessment, include, but are not limited to, a
significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value
of an asset or an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. The Company is considered one
reporting unit. As a result, to determine whether or not goodwill may be impaired, the Company
compares its book value to its market capitalization. If the trading price or the average trading
price of the Companys common stock is below the book value per share for a sustained period, a
goodwill impairment test will be performed by comparing book value to estimated market value. The
Companys book value per share was $10.00 at June 30, 2005 which was lower then the trading value
of the Companys common stock during the six month period ended June 30, 2005. Additionally, the
Company performs other tests, such as the multiple of revenues and present value of future cash
flows to further validate the fair market value of its goodwill. The Company completed its most
recent annual goodwill impairment analysis as of September 30, 2004 and concluded that as of
September 30, 2004, there was no goodwill impairment.
Note 6 Intangible Assets
The following tables summarize details of the Companys total purchased intangible assets (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing technology |
|
$ |
2,415 |
|
|
$ |
(1,610 |
) |
|
$ |
805 |
|
Technology licenses |
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
(5,847 |
) |
|
|
943 |
|
Patents |
|
|
6,647 |
|
|
|
(5,674 |
) |
|
|
973 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
464 |
|
Other |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,825 |
|
|
$ |
(13,640 |
) |
|
$ |
3,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing technology |
|
$ |
2,415 |
|
|
$ |
(1,457 |
) |
|
$ |
958 |
|
Technology licenses |
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
(5,093 |
) |
|
|
1,697 |
|
Patents |
|
|
6,647 |
|
|
|
(5,590 |
) |
|
|
1,057 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
499 |
|
Other |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,825 |
|
|
$ |
(12,614 |
) |
|
$ |
4,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys purchased intangible assets have remaining lives ranging from 4 to 11 years. The
Company performs reviews for impairment of all its purchased intangible assets whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. As
of June 30, 2005, management concluded there was no indication of events or changes in
circumstances indicating that the carrying amount of purchased intangible assets may not be
recoverable. The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets as of June
30, 2005 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Amortization |
For the years ending December 31, |
|
Amount |
2005(remaining six months) |
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
2006 |
|
|
726 |
|
2007 |
|
|
526 |
|
2008 |
|
|
250 |
|
2009 |
|
|
210 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 Accrued Restructuring and Other Charges
Accrued restructuring and other charges consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Second quarter 2005 restructuring charge |
|
$ |
1,083 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fourth quarter 2004 restructuring charge |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
Third quarter 2004 restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
Fourth quarter 2001 restructuring charge |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
|
$ |
1,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company evaluates the adequacy of the accrued restructuring and other charges on a
quarterly basis. As a result, the Company records certain reclassifications and reversals to the
accrued restructuring and other charges based on the results of the evaluation. The total accrued
restructuring and other charges for each restructuring event are not affected by reclassifications.
Reversals are recorded in the period in which the Company determines that expected restructuring
and other obligations are less than the amounts accrued.
13
Second Quarter 2005 Restructuring
During the second quarter of 2005 the Company entered into a restructuring plan that included
the elimination of 93 employees primarily within the Companys manufacturing operations. These
employee positions will be eliminated over the next four quarters in conjunction with continued
outsourcing of production to the Companys primary manufacturing partners, Celestica and Foxconn.
The restructuring charge includes severance and other employee-related separation costs of
approximately $1.1 million, which will be paid out over the next four quarters. Expenditures in
the second quarter of 2005 are associated with severance payments made to employees whose
employment terminated in the second quarter.
The following table summarizes the changes to the second quarter 2005 restructuring costs (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Termination and |
|
|
Related Costs |
Restructuring and other costs |
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
Expenditures |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
1,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2004 Restructuring
During the fourth quarter of 2004 the Company eliminated 58 positions. These reductions
resulted from an increase in outsourced manufacturing as well as to continue the Companys shift of
skills required to develop, market, sell, and support more advanced embedded platforms and
solutions. As of June 30, 2005 restructuring charges include severance and other employee-related
separation costs as well as certain associated legal fees.
The following table summarizes the changes to the fourth quarter 2004 restructuring costs (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination and |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Related Costs |
|
Charges |
|
Total |
Restructuring and other costs |
|
$ |
1,630 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
Expenditures |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2004 |
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Expenditures |
|
|
(952 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(975 |
) |
Reversals |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures |
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The restructuring accrual was decreased by $1.2 million during the six months ended June 30,
2005. The $33 thousand reversal recorded in the first quarter of 2005 was due to the retention of
an employee who filled a new position within the Company. The remaining accrual balance primarily
includes severance costs associated with one employee with a termination date in the third quarter
of 2005.
Third Quarter 2004 Restructuring
In August 2004, the Company initiated plans to eliminate approximately 14 engineering and
marketing positions in its Birmingham, UK office during the fourth quarter of 2004. The Company has
integrated the work done by these employees into other RadiSys locations. In conjunction with the
elimination of positions, some R&D spending has been re-directed to align with the Companys
strategy to deliver more integrated standards-based solutions. As of June 30, 2005 restructuring
charges include severance and other employee-related separation costs for 11 employees as well as
certain associated legal fees. Restructuring charges also include a $30 thousand loss on the
disposal of certain property and equipment.
14
The following table summarizes the changes to the third quarter 2004 restructuring costs (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination and |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Related Costs |
|
Charges |
|
Total |
Restructuring and other costs |
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
428 |
|
Additions |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Expenditures |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
Reversals |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2004 |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Reversals |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, $86 thousand in severance and related costs was
reversed as one of the effected employees was retained to fill a new position within the Company.
Additions to the restructuring accrual were primarily due to relocation costs and the write-offs
that resulted from losses incurred on the disposal of property and equipment. During the first
quarter of 2005 the Redditch, U.K. office was vacated and property and equipment that was not
transferred to other locations was either disposed or sold. The disposal or sale of this property
and equipment resulted in a net loss of $30 thousand. Additions to the reserve during second
quarter of 2005 include $12 thousand in relocation expenses and $26 thousand paid for repairs
associated with the vacated Redditch office building.
Fourth Quarter 2001 Restructuring
The following table summarizes the changes to the fourth quarter 2001 restructuring costs (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination and |
|
|
|
|
|
Property and |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Related Costs |
|
Facilities |
|
Equipment |
|
Charges |
|
Total |
Restructuring costs |
|
$ |
914 |
|
|
$ |
2,417 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
3,926 |
|
Expenditures |
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(452 |
) |
Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2001 |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
Expenditures |
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(1,353 |
) |
Reversals |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(590 |
) |
Reversals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
Expenditures lease buy-out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
Reversals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance accrued as of June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accrual amount remaining as of June 30, 2005 represents mainly lease obligations
relating to the facilities in Boca Raton, Florida expected to be paid monthly for the next 7
months.
Note 8 Short-Term Borrowings
15
During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company renewed its line of credit facility,
which expires on March 31, 2006, for $20.0 million at an interest rate based upon the lower of the
London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.0% or the banks prime rate. The line of credit is
collateralized by the Companys non-equity investments and is reduced by any standby letters of
credit. At March 31, 2005, the Company had a standby letter of credit outstanding related to one of
its medical insurance carriers for $105 thousand. The market value of non-equity investments must
exceed 125.0% of the borrowed facility amount, and the investments must meet specified investment
grade ratings.
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding balances on the line of
credit or any draws under the standby letter of credit and the Company was in compliance with all
debt covenants.
Note 9 Long-Term Liabilities
Convertible Senior Notes
During November 2003, the Company completed a private offering of $100 million aggregate
principal amount of 1.375% convertible senior notes due November 15, 2023 to qualified
institutional buyers. The discount on the convertible senior notes amounted to $3 million.
Convertible senior notes are unsecured obligations convertible into the Companys Common Stock
and rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future obligations that are unsecured
and unsubordinated. Interest on the senior notes accrues at 1.375% per year and is payable
semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. The convertible senior notes are payable in full in
November 2023. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to
maturity under certain circumstances, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of the
Companys Common Stock at a conversion price of $23.57 per share, which is equal to a conversion
rate of 42.4247 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. The notes are convertible prior to
maturity into shares of the Companys Common Stock under certain circumstances that include but are
not limited to (i) conversion due to the closing price of the Companys Common Stock on the trading
day prior to the conversion date reaching 120% or more of the conversion price of the notes on such
trading date and (ii) conversion due to the trading price of the notes falling below 98% of the
conversion value. Upon conversion the Company will have the right to deliver, in lieu of Common
Stock, cash or a combination of cash and Common Stock. The Company may redeem all or a portion of
the notes at its option on or after November 15, 2006 but before November 15, 2008 provided that
the closing price of the Companys Common Stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price for at least
20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the
date of the notice of the provisional redemption. On or after November 15, 2008, the Company may
redeem the notes at any time. On November 15, 2008, November 15, 2013, and November 15, 2018,
holders of the convertible senior notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase, in
cash, all or any part of the notes held by such holder at a purchase price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the notes being purchased, together with accrued and unpaid interest and
additional interest, if any, up to but excluding the purchase date. The accretion of the discount
on the notes is calculated using the effective interest method.
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the Company had outstanding convertible senior notes
with a face value of $100 million. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the book value of the
convertible senior notes was $97.2 million and $97.1 million, respectively, net of unamortized
discount of $2.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Amortization of the discount on the
convertible senior notes was $33 thousand and $36 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004, respectively. Amortization of the discount on the convertible senior notes was $66
thousand and $68 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
estimated fair value of the convertible senior notes was $97.8 million and $106.8 million at June
30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Convertible Subordinated Notes
Convertible subordinated notes are unsecured obligations convertible into the Companys Common
Stock and are subordinated to all present and future senior indebtedness of the Company. Interest
on the subordinated notes accrues at 5.5% per year and is payable semi-annually on February 15 and
August 15. The convertible subordinated notes are payable in full in August 2007. The notes are
convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or before maturity, unless previously
redeemed or repurchased, into shares of the Companys Common Stock at a conversion price of $67.80
per share, which is equal to a conversion rate of 14.7484 shares per $1,000 principal amount of
notes. If the closing price of the Companys Common Stock equals or exceeds 140% of the conversion
price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the
trading day before the date on which a notice of redemption is mailed, then the Company may redeem
all or a portion of the notes at its option at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of
the notes plus a premium (which declines annually on August 15 of each year), together with accrued
and
16
unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. The accretion of the discount on the
notes is calculated using the effective interest method.
In the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company repurchased $125 thousand principal
amount of the convertible subordinated notes at face value for a loss of $1 thousand.
In the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company repurchased $1.0 million principal
amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $12 thousand. The
Company repurchased the notes in the open market for $990 thousand and, as a result, recorded a
loss of $3 thousand.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company repurchased $58.8 million principal amount
of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $897 thousand. The Company
repurchased the notes in the open market for $58.2 million and, as a result, recorded a loss of
$387 thousand.
On April 26, 2005 the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of the remaining $8.9 million
principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes. The Company will consider the purchase of
the notes on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject
to market conditions.
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the Company had outstanding convertible subordinated
notes with a face value of $8.9 million and $10.0 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004 the book value of the convertible subordinated notes was $8.8 million and $9.9
million, respectively, net of amortized discount of $92 thousand and $126 thousand, respectively.
Amortization of the discount on the convertible subordinated notes was $10 thousand and $46
thousand for the three ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively and $21 thousand and $118
thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The estimated fair value
of the convertible subordinated notes was $8.9 million and $10.0 million at June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively.
The aggregate maturities of long-term liabilities for each of the years in the five year
period ending December 31, 2009 and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible |
|
Convertible |
|
|
Senior |
|
Subordinated |
For the Years Ending December 31, |
|
Notes |
|
Notes |
2005 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,868 |
|
2008(1) |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
8,868 |
|
Less: unamortized discount |
|
|
(2,787 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
Less: current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
$ |
97,213 |
|
|
$ |
8,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On or after November 15, 2008, the Company may redeem the Convertible Senior Notes at any
time. On November 15, 2008, November 15, 2013, and November 15, 2018, holders of the
convertible senior notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase, in cash, all
or any part of the notes held by such holder at a purchase price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the notes being purchased, together with accrued and unpaid interest and
additional interest, if any, up to but excluding the purchase date. |
Note 10 Restricted Stock
On March 1, 2005, the Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors
approved the form of the restricted stock agreement to be used in connection with restricted stock
awards to be granted to employees of the Company under the terms of the Companys 1995 Stock
Incentive Plan. The agreement provides, among other things, that 33% of the shares will vest each
year following the date of the grant. During the second quarter employees that have historically
been awarded compensation in the form of stock options were allowed to elect to receive restricted
stock that approximated the value of stock options that otherwise would have been awarded. Any
employee selecting restricted stock received 1 share of restricted stock for every 3 stock options
they would have
17
otherwise received. Effective May 2, 2005 the Compensation and Development Committee approved
the grant of restricted stock awards to certain employees totaling 40,502 shares. The Company
recorded $31 thousand of stock-based compensation related to the issuance of restricted stock for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. The Company did not incur any stock-based
compensation expense associated with restricted stock for the three and six months ended June 30,
2004.
Note 11 Basic and Diluted Income Per Share
A reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator used to calculate basic and diluted
income per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Numerator Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, basic |
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
$ |
3,507 |
|
|
$ |
5,151 |
|
|
$ |
6,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, basic |
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
6,355 |
|
Interest on convertible notes, net of tax benefit(1) |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, diluted |
|
$ |
2,807 |
|
|
$ |
3,739 |
|
|
$ |
5,636 |
|
|
$ |
6,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used to calculate income per share , basic |
|
|
19,981 |
|
|
|
18,826 |
|
|
|
19,882 |
|
|
|
18,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used to calculate income per share , basic |
|
|
19,981 |
|
|
|
18,826 |
|
|
|
19,882 |
|
|
|
18,659 |
|
Effect of convertible notes(1) |
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options(2) |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
Effect of dilutive unvested restricted stock |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used to calculate income per share , diluted |
|
|
24,620 |
|
|
|
23,833 |
|
|
|
24,548 |
|
|
|
23,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(1) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest on convertible subordinated notes and related as-if converted shares were excluded
from the calculation as the effect would be anti-dilutive. For the three months ended June 30,
2005 and 2004, the total number of as-if converted shares excluded from the calculation
associated with the convertible subordinated notes was 132 thousand and 635 thousand. For the
six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the total number of as-if converted shares excluded
from the calculation associated with the convertible subordinated notes was 138 thousand and
825 thousand. |
|
(2) |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, options amounting to 2.4 million and 1.9
million were excluded from the calculation as the exercise prices were higher than the average
market price of the common shares; therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive. For the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, options amounting to 2.3 million and 976 thousand were
excluded from the calculation as the exercise prices were higher than the average market price
of the common shares; therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive. |
Note 12 Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate for the three month ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 differs from
the statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits related to certain foreign sales, the amortization
of goodwill for tax purposes, and tax benefits associated with research and development credits.
The Companys effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 differed from the
statutory rate due to tax benefits related to certain foreign sales and other permanent
differences.
On October 22, 2004, the President of the United States signed the American Jobs Creation Act
of 2004 (the Act). One of the key provisions of the Act includes a repeal of the extraterritorial
income exclusion with certain transitional rules. In its place, the Act provides a relief provision
for domestic manufacturers by providing a new domestic manufacturing deduction. The Act also
includes a temporary incentive for U.S. multinationals to repatriate foreign earnings and other
international tax reforms designed to improve the global competitiveness of U.S. multinationals.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the Act on its effective tax rate, cash flows and
financial statements and expects to complete the evaluation by the end of 2005.
18
Note 13 Segment Information
The Company has adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. SFAS No. 131 establishes standards for the reporting by public business enterprises
of information about operating segments, products and services, geographic areas, and major
customers. The method for determining what information to report is based upon the way that
management organizes the segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing
financial performance.
The Company is one operating segment according to the provisions of SFAS No. 131.
Revenues on a product and services basis are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Hardware |
|
$ |
64,079 |
|
|
$ |
57,496 |
|
|
$ |
119,650 |
|
|
$ |
115,743 |
|
Software royalties and licenses |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
3,067 |
|
Software maintenance |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
Engineering and other services |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
65,956 |
|
|
$ |
60,253 |
|
|
$ |
123,473 |
|
|
$ |
121,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, the Companys customers are not the end-users of its products. The Company
ultimately derives its revenues from three end markets as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Service Provider Systems |
|
$ |
33,142 |
|
|
$ |
24,479 |
|
|
$ |
59,887 |
|
|
$ |
51,839 |
|
Commercial Systems |
|
|
15,412 |
|
|
|
18,973 |
|
|
|
33,728 |
|
|
|
37,904 |
|
Enterprise Systems |
|
|
17,402 |
|
|
|
16,801 |
|
|
|
29,858 |
|
|
|
31,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
65,956 |
|
|
$ |
60,253 |
|
|
$ |
123,473 |
|
|
$ |
121,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information about the Companys geographic revenues and long-lived assets by geographical area is
as follows (in thousands):
Geographic Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
United States |
|
$ |
21,469 |
|
|
$ |
24,750 |
|
|
$ |
42,594 |
|
|
$ |
47,604 |
|
Other North America |
|
|
3,922 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
7,257 |
|
|
|
7,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
25,391 |
|
|
|
27,760 |
|
|
|
49,851 |
|
|
|
54,852 |
|
Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA) |
|
|
33,976 |
|
|
|
28,962 |
|
|
|
61,825 |
|
|
|
59,635 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
6,589 |
|
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
11,797 |
|
|
|
6,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
65,956 |
|
|
$ |
60,253 |
|
|
$ |
123,473 |
|
|
$ |
121,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Long-lived assets by Geographic Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
11,855 |
|
|
$ |
12,031 |
|
EMEA |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,113 |
|
|
$ |
14,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
27,521 |
|
|
$ |
27,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
3,185 |
|
|
$ |
4,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two customers accounted for more than 10% of total revenues in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2004. These customers accounted for the following percentages of total revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Nokia |
|
|
35.5 |
% |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
|
|
25.9 |
% |
Nortel |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the following customers accounted for more than 10%
of accounts receivable. These customers accounted for the following percentages of accounts
receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Nokia |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
Nortel |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Diebold |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Accounted for less than 10% of accounts receivable. |
Note 14 Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, the Company periodically becomes involved in litigation. As
of June 30, 2005, management believes that the Company has no pending litigation that would have a
material effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
20
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction and Overview
RadiSys is a leading provider of advanced embedded solutions for the service provider,
commercial and enterprise systems markets. Through intimate customer collaboration, and combining
innovative technologies and industry leading architecture, we help original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs) bring better products to market faster and more economically. Our products include
embedded boards, software, platforms and systems, which are used in todays complex computing,
processing and network intensive applications.
Our Strategy
Our strategy is to provide customers with advanced embedded solutions in our target markets.
We believe this strategy enables our customers to focus their limited resources and development
efforts on their key areas of competency allowing them to provide higher value systems with a
time-to-market advantage and a lower total cost of ownership. Historically, system makers had been
largely vertically integrated, developing most, if not all, of the functional building blocks of
their systems. System makers are now more focused on their core expertise and are looking for
partners like RadiSys to provide them with merchant-supplied building blocks for a growing number
of processing and networking functions.
Our Markets
We provide advanced embedded solutions to three distinct markets:
|
|
Service Provider Systems The service provider systems market includes voice, video and data
systems deployed into public networks. The service provider systems market consists of a
variety of telecommunications focused applications, including 2, 2.5 and 3G wireless
infrastructure products, wireline infrastructure products, packet-based switches and unified
messaging products. |
|
|
|
Commercial Systems The commercial systems market includes the following sub-markets:
medical, transaction terminals, industrial automation equipment and test and measurement
equipment. Examples of products into which our commercial systems embedded solutions are
incorporated include ultrasound equipment, immunodiagnostics and hematology systems, CAT Scan
(CT) imaging equipment, ATMs, point of sale terminals, semiconductor manufacturing
equipment, electronics assembly equipment and high-end test equipment. |
|
|
|
Enterprise Systems The enterprise systems market includes embedded compute, processing and
networking systems used in private enterprise IT infrastructure. The enterprise systems market
consists of a variety of applications, including voice messaging, storage, data centers,
Private Branch Exchange (PBX) systems, network access and security and switching
applications. |
Starting in the third quarter of 2005 we will be changing our revenue reporting by market. We
are seeing growing commonality and a convergence of technology and products within our current
Service Provider and Enterprise markets. Based on this, we will be combining these two markets and
report the underlying revenue associated with these markets as Communications Networking starting
in the third quarter of 2005. We will also begin reporting a new sub-segment of the Communications
Networking market for IP network and messaging revenues. Our Commercial market reporting will
remain unchanged.
Our Market Drivers
We believe there are a number of fundamental drivers for growth in the embedded solutions
market, including:
|
|
|
Increasing focus by OEMs to utilize outsourced modular building blocks to develop new
systems. We believe OEMs are combining their internal development efforts with
merchant-supplied platforms from partners like RadiSys to deliver more systems to market,
faster at lower total cost of ownership. |
|
|
|
|
Increasing levels of programmable, intelligent and networked functionality embedded in a
variety of systems, including systems for monitoring and control, real-time information
processing and high-bandwidth network connectivity. |
21
|
|
|
Increasing demand for standards-based solutions, such as Advanced Telecommunications
Architecture (ATCA), and Computer-on-Modules (COM) Express that motivates system makers
to take advantage of proven and validated standards-based products. |
|
|
|
|
Increasing demand for new technologies that utilize network processors, such as security
and high-volume networking applications. |
In the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations, we intend to
provide information that will assist in understanding our financial statements, the changes in
certain key items in those financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005
compared to same periods in 2004 and for the period ended June 30, 2005 compared to December 31,
2004, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes. This discussion should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in
this filing, and in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Certain statements made in this section of the report may be deemed to be forward-looking
statements. Please see the information contained in the section entitled FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS and the RISK FACTORS.
Overview
Total revenue was $66.0 million and $60.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Total revenue was $123.5 million and $121.4 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, backlog was
approximately $25.3 million and $30.9 million, respectively. We include all purchase orders
scheduled for delivery within 12 months in backlog. The general trend within our addressable
markets is for shorter lead times and supplier managed inventory, which will generally decrease
backlog as a percentage of revenue. The increase in revenue for the three months ended June 30,
2005 compared to the same period in 2004 was primarily driven by strong demand within the wireless
market as our product content continues to expand with 2.5 and 3G deployments. We currently believe
that the end markets that we serve will strengthen in 2005 and will experience mid to high single
digit growth rates in 2005 as compared to 2004. We expect to grow faster than our customers end
markets in 2005 due to new product introductions and increasing content in our customers
solutions.
In 2004 we shifted more of our investments from predominantly one-off custom-designed products
to standards-based, re-usable platforms and solutions. We believe standards-based platforms provide
our customers a number of fundamental benefits. First, by using ready-made platform solutions
rather than ground-start custom-designs, our customers can achieve significantly shorter intervals
and faster time-to-market. Second, we believe our customers can achieve a lower total cost by using
solutions that are leveraged across multiple applications rather than a single-use proprietary
solution. By offering ready-made platforms, we believe we have the opportunity to address a wider
range of new market opportunities with the potential for faster time to revenue than with
ground-start, custom-designs. We believe this ability to reuse designs makes our business and
investment model more scalable. Finally, we believe a more standard product focused model will
allow us to provide more integrated higher value solutions to our customers than we have typically
delivered under a custom-design model.
In 2004 we announced our Promentum family of ATCA products and in June 2005 we recorded our
first revenue associated with these products. The Promentum family of products includes universal
carrier cards, switch and control modules, disk storage modules, compute modules, and a 14-slot
shelf or chassis. The Promentum SYS-6000 integrates these individual products into a blade server
platform system. We believe the Promentum SYS-6000 system will provide customers a highly reliable
managed platform on which to build their new voice and data offerings. During the second quarter of
2005 the Company announced the Promentum ATCA-7010, a packet processing module that allows the
highest bandwidth available in a single ATCA® slot. This product is the latest addition to the
Companys family of ATCA-compliant products featuring dual Intel® IXP28xx network processors and is
designed to address 10 Gbps wirespeed packet processing in network applications that demand high
bandwidth throughput such as security gateways, GGSNs, Broadband-Remote Access Servers, edge
routers and session controllers. We have significant experience in the design, delivery and
deployment of carrier-grade, modular platforms. We believe the ATCA standard increases our
opportunity to implement reusable platforms, enabling the deployment of more flexible solutions
based on cost-effective commercial technologies. We believe our core ATCA solutions will be
applicable across a wide range of customers and applications and are potentially applicable in all
of our defined markets. These integrated hardware and software platforms make extensive use of
common architectural and component designs, usingcarrier grade operating systems and middleware,
and will reduce development time and costs, which enhances application portability.
22
In addition to our new ATCA offerings, we announced our new Procelerant series of modular
computing solutions for customers in our commercial systems markets for medical, transaction
terminals and test and measurement applications. During the second quarter of 2005 we closed our
first Procelerant application and are seeing a strong demand for evaluation units. We believe
these new modular products will represent a family of high density, flexible solutions that will
enable commercial systems customers to achieve more rapid time to market with cost effective
designs.
Net income was $2.6 million and $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Net income per share was $0.13 and $0.11, basic and diluted, respectively, for
the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to net income per share of $0.19 and $0.16, basic and
diluted, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Net income was $5.2 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to net income of $6.4 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2004. Net income per share was $0.26 and $0.23, basic and diluted, respectively, for the
six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to net income per share of $0.34 and $0.29, basic and
diluted, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2004. During the second quarter of 2005
the Company recorded a $1.1 million restructuring charge for severance and related expenses for 93
employees primarily within the Companys manufacturing operations, where positions will be
eliminated over the next four quarters in conjunction with continued outsourcing of production to
the Companys manufacturing partners. The restructuring is necessary to balance our production
capacity with our level of outsourced manufacturing and the Company currently expects to incur
additional restructuring charges over the next four quarters totaling approximately $200 thousand.
Due to the restructuring charge taken in the second quarter of 2005, a lower average gross
margin, and higher research and development spending on standards-based products, our profitability
has decreased in the first and second quarters of 2005 compared to the same periods in 2004. The
increase in expenses associated restructuring and research and development have been partially
offset by lower interest expense associated with a lower outstanding debt balance in the first six
months of 2005 as well as an increase in interest income due to higher yields and a higher balance
of invested cash. Revenues in the first six months of 2005 were up compared to the same period in
2004 but due to a lower gross margins as a percentage, our profitability was not significantly
impacted by the increase in revenue. Our gross margin as a percentage of revenue declined
primarily due to product mix as well as changes in our excess and obsolete inventory provision and
purchase commitment liabilities associated with our manufacturing transfers to our contract
manufacturing partners. Product mix has impacted our gross margin as a percentage of revenue due
to a higher percentage of revenue coming from higher volume products with competitive pricing. We
also continue to incur some redundant manufacturing costs as we move forward with outsourcing our
internal manufacturing to our partners Celestica and Foxconn.
In November 2003, we completed a private offering of 1.375% convertible senior notes due
November 15, 2023 to qualified institutional buyers, resulting in net proceeds of $97 million. We
plan to use the proceeds of the offering for general corporate purposes including working capital,
potential acquisitions, partnership opportunities, repayment of existing debt obligations, and the
purchase of outstanding common stock. During 2004, we repurchased $58.8 million principal amount of
the 5.5% convertible subordinated notes in the open market for $58.2 million. During the first
quarter of 2005, we repurchased $1 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes
in the open market for $990 thousand. On April 26, 2005 the Board of Directors approved the
repurchase of the remaining $8.9 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes.
On May 20, 2005 we repurchased an additional $125 thousand principal amount of the convertible
subordinated notes. If and when we repurchase the remaining convertible subordinated notes, we
anticipate incurring a small loss on the repurchase of the notes.
In addition, on April 26, 2005 the Board of Directors also authorized the repurchase of up to
$5 million of our outstanding shares of common stock. The Company currently intends to purchase the
notes and stock on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions from time to time
subject to market conditions.
During the second quarter of 2005 we issued 40 thousand shares of restricted stock and
incurred $31 thousand in stock-based compensation associated with this issuance. We anticipate
incurring approximately $530 thousand in compensation expense over the next three years associated
with the unvested shares included in this grant. During the three and six months ended June 30,
2004, we incurred $356 and $533 thousand of stock-based compensation expense associated with shares
to be issued pursuant to the Companys 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). We incurred
stock-based compensation expense because the original number of ESPP shares approved by the
shareholders was insufficient to meet employee demand for an ESPP offering which was consummated in
February of 2003 and ended in August of 2004. The Company subsequently received shareholder
approval for additional ESPP shares in May 2003.
Cash and cash equivalents and investments amounted to $211.8 million and $198.6 million at
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The increase in cash and cash equivalents and
investments during the six months ended June 30, 2005, was
23
primarily due to cash provided from operating activities. We generated net cash from
operations in excess of net income in the six months ended June 30, 2005. Management believes that
cash flows from operations, available cash and investment balances, and short-term borrowings will
be sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs for the short-term and long-term.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company reaffirms its critical accounting policies and use of estimates as reported in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. As a result of our
continued execution on our strategy of increasing the level of outsourced manufacturing the Company
now considers our policies and estimates associated with our adverse purchase commitments reserve
to be critical.
Adverse Purchase Commitments
We are contractually obligated to reimburse our contract manufacturers for the cost or
liability for excess inventory used in the manufacture of our products, for which there is no
alternative use. As we continue to execute on our strategy of increasing the level of outsourced
manufacturing the liability for adverse purchase commitments will become more significant. This
will offset, however, by lower required reserves for escess and obsolete exposure on lower amount
of Company-owned inventory. Estimates for adverse purchase commitments are derived from reports
received from our contract manufacturers. Increases to this liability are charged to cost of goods
sold. When and if the Company takes possession of inventory reserved for in this liability, the
liability is transferred from other liabilities to our excess and obsolete inventory reserve. This
liability, referred to as adverse purchase commitments, is provided for in other accrued
liabilities. Adverse purchase commitments amounted to $599 thousand and $485 thousand at June 30,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of revenues for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenues |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
70.6 |
|
|
|
66.8 |
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Intangible assets amortization |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Restructuring and other charges (reversals) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Loss on repurchase of convertible
subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Revenues. Revenues increased by $5.7 million or 9.5%, from $60.3 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2004 to $66.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. Revenues increased by
$2.1 million or 1.7%, from $121.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $123.5 million
in the six months ended June 30, 2005. Included in the revenues in the first quarter of 2004, was a
$3.1 million end of life component inventory sale to one of our major customers. The inventory sale
was recorded as revenue but did not generate any gross margin since the inventory was sold at cost.
24
The increase in revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period
in 2004, is due to an increase in revenues in the service provider systems market of $8.6 million
and enterprise systems markets of $601 thousand, partially offset by a decrease in revenues in the
commercial systems market of $3.5 million. The increase in revenue for the six months ended June
30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, is due to an increase in revenues in the service
provider systems of $8.0 million partially offset by a decrease in revenues in the enterprise and
commercial systems markets of $1.8 million and $4.2 million, respectively. The $3.1 million end of
life component inventory sale to one of our major customers was included the service provider
systems market revenues in the first quarter of 2004. As of June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004,
backlog was approximately $25.3 million and $30.9 million, respectively.
Revenues in the service provider systems market increased in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in 2004 due to strong demand within the wireless market
as our product content continues to expand with 2.5 and 3G deployments.
Revenues in the enterprise systems market increased in the three months ended June 30, 2005
compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to strength in our IP PBX and messaging products
resulting from the completion of customer specific product upgrades.
Revenues in the commercial systems market decreased in the three and six months ended June 30,
2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to declines in our industrial automation
and transaction terminal business, partially offset by increases within our test and measurement
market. We believe that our transaction terminal revenue is now at an expected near-term run rate
level and therefore expect our commercial systems revenue to be about the same as our second
quarter of 2005.
Given the dynamics of these markets, we may experience general fluctuations in the percentage
of revenue attributable to each market and, as a result, the quarter to quarter comparisons of our
markets often are not indicative of overall economic trends affecting the long-term performance of
our markets. We currently expect that each of our markets will continue to represent a significant
portion of total revenues.
From a geographic perspective, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to
the same period in 2004 the overall increase in revenues was split between customers located in the
EMEA and Asia Pacific region. For the six month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same
period in 2004 revenues in the EMEA region increased by $2.2 million while Asia Pacific revenues
increased by $4.9 million. This increase to the Asia Pacific region is due to multinational
customers receiving products directly into the Asia Pacific region. For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005 revenues from the Americas region declined by $2.4 million and $5.0 million,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2004. The decline in this region has been a result
of declines in our industrial automation and transaction terminal business as well as a shift of
sales to our multinational customers receiving directly into the Asia Pacific region. We currently
expect continued quarterly fluctuations in the percentage of revenue from each geographic region.
Gross Margin. Gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was 29.4% compared to
33.2% for the same period in 2004. Gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was 30.7%
compared to 32.0% for the same period in 2004.
Approximately half of the decrease in gross margin as a percentage of revenues for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in 2004 was attributable to product
mix as more of our revenue is coming from higher volume products with competitive pricing. The
remainder of the decrease is associated with our provision for excess and obsolete inventory and
purchase commitment liabilities associated with our manufacturing transfers to our contract
manufacturers partners. We also continue to incur some redundant manufacturing costs as we move
forward with outsourcing our internal manufacturing to our partners Celestica and Foxconn.
Based on current forecasted revenue mix, a leveling off of inventory exposures, and
strategically competitive pricing to gain market share, we currently anticipate that gross margins
will be in the high 20s to 30% range for the next few quarters. This margin range excludes any
impact from stock-based compensation expense that would result from the implementation of a new
accounting standard that requires the recognition of stock-based compensation expense associated
with employee stock options, which will be effective in 2006.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salary,
bonuses, and benefits for product development staff, and cost of design and development supplies
and equipment, net of reimbursements for non-recurring engineering services. Research and
development expenses increased $157 thousand, or 2.2%, from $7.1 million for the three months ended
June
25
30, 2004 to $7.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Research and development
expenses increased $1.3 million, or 10.0%, from $13.5 million for the six months ended June 30,
2004 to $14.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. During the second quarter of 2005 we
continued to increase headcount at our Shanghai development center and have added other expenses in
connection with the development of the infrastructure to support this location. The investment in
this region combined with ongoing costs associated with the development of standards-based
products, such as ATCA, have driven the increase in research and development expenses. Our
long-term target for research and development expenses is around 10% of revenues, excluding any
impact from stock-based compensation expense.
Selling, General, and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses
consist primarily of salary, commissions, bonuses and benefits for sales, marketing, executive, and
administrative personnel, as well as the costs of professional services and costs of other general
corporate activities. SG&A expenses remained relatively flat at $7.7 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. SG&A expenses decreased $399 thousand, or 2.6%, from $15.4 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The
decrease in SG&A expense in the six months ended June 30, 2005 is primarily associated with $614
thousand in non-reoccurring costs that were recognized in the first quarter of 2004 associated with
a potential acquisition that was ultimately abandoned. Without these costs we would have seen a
slight increase in SG&A expense primarily due to annual merit increases and increased sales and
marketing expenses. The increase in sales and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30,
2005 is largely attributable to increased commissions as a result of increased revenue. Our
long-term goal for SG&A expenses is around 10% of revenues, excluding any impact from stock-based
compensation expense.
Stock-based Compensation Expense. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005,
the Company incurred $31 thousand of stock-based compensation associated with the issuance of
restricted stock. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, we incurred $356 thousand
and $533 thousand of stock-based compensation expense, respectively. The stock-based compensation
expense was associated with shares to be issued pursuant to our 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP). We incurred stock-based compensation expense because the original number of ESPP shares
approved by the shareholders was insufficient to meet employee demand for an ESPP offering which
was consummated in February 2003 and ended in August 2004. We subsequently received shareholder
approval for additional ESPP shares in May 2003. The shares issued in the February 2003 ESPP
offering in excess of the original number of ESPP shares approved at the beginning of the offering
(the shortfall) triggered recognition of stock-based compensation expense under the intrinsic
value method. The shortfall amounted to 138 thousand and 149 thousand shares in May 2004 and August
2004, respectively.
We recognized stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
356 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets Amortization. Intangible assets consist of purchased technology, patents and
other identifiable intangible assets. Intangible assets amortization expense was $513 thousand and
$515 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Intangible assets
amortization expense was $1.0 million and $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Intangible assets amortization decreased due to certain intangible assets
becoming fully amortized during the first and second quarters of 2004. Goodwill and all other
intangible assets have been and will periodically be evaluated for impairment. We perform reviews
for impairment of goodwill and all purchased intangible assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We completed
our annual goodwill impairment analysis as of September 30, 2004 and concluded that as of September
30, 2004, there was no goodwill or intangible assets impairment. We are required under certain
circumstances, to update our impairment analysis, which may result in losses on acquired goodwill
and intangible assets.
Restructuring and Other Charges (Reversals). We evaluate the adequacy of the accrued
restructuring and other charges on a quarterly basis. As a result, we record certain
reclassifications and reversals to the accrued restructuring and other charges based on the results
of the evaluation. The total accrued restructuring and other charges for each restructuring event
are not affected by reclassifications. Reversals are recorded in the period in which we determine
that expected restructuring and other obligations are less than the amounts accrued. Tables
summarizing the activity in the accrued liability for each restructuring event are contained in
Note 7
26
of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. During the first six months
of 2005 and 2004, we recorded restructuring and other charges and reversals as described below.
Second Quarter 2005 Restructuring
During the second quarter of 2005 the Company initiated a plan to eliminate 93 positions over
the next four quarters. These reductions are the result of the increase in outsourced
manufacturing. For the three month period ending June 30, 2005 the Company recognized $1.1 million
in restructuring charges associated with this plan. The restructuring charge includes severance
and other employee-related separation costs for 93 employees. We expect the workforce reduction to
be substantially completed by June 30, 2006.
Additions. In addition to the severance and other employee-related separation costs associated
with the second quarter 2005 restructuring, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 we
recorded additions amounting to $38 thousand and $139 thousand, respectively.
The additions
included relocation costs, fixed asset impairments and building repair costs associated with the
third quarter 2004 restructuring.
Reversals. We recorded reversals amounting to $119 thousand during three and six months ended
June 30, 2005 primarily due to the retention of two employees who were transferred into new
positions within the Company. We recorded reversals amounting to $678 thousand and $842 thousand
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, relating primarily to a buy-out
of the remaining lease obligations on our Houston facility vacated as a result of the restructuring
events and various amounts originally accrued for certain non-cancelable leases for facilities
vacated as a result of the restructuring events. We entered into subleasing arrangements for a
portion of these facilities and as a result we reduced the restructuring accruals.
Loss on the Repurchase of Convertible Notes. In the first quarter of 2005, we repurchased $1.0
million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $12
thousand. We repurchased the notes in the open market for $990 thousand and, as a result, recorded
a loss of $3 thousand. In the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company repurchased $125
thousand principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes at face value for a loss of $1
thousand. In the three months ended June 30, 2004, we repurchased $58.8 million principal amount
of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $897 thousand. We repurchased
the notes in the open market for $58.2 million and, as a result, recorded a loss of $387 thousand.
The repurchase of the remaining $8.8 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes
has been approved by the board of directors and when and if we repurchase the remaining convertible
subordinated notes, we anticipate incurring a loss on the repurchase of the notes.
Interest Expense. Interest expense primarily includes interest expense incurred on convertible
senior and subordinated notes. Interest expense decreased $522 thousand, or 49.8%, from $1.0
million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $527 thousand for the three months ended June
30, 2005. Interest expense decreased $1.4 million, or 56.8%, from $2.5 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2004 to $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease in the
interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in
2004 is due to the decrease in interest expense associated with the convertible subordinated notes
as a result of the repurchase of $58.8 million principal amount of subordinated convertible notes
during 2004.
Interest Income. Interest income increased $627 thousand, or 81.2%, from $772 thousand for the
three months ended June 30, 2004 to $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Interest
income increased $942 thousand, or 57.9%, from $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004
to $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Interest income increased as a result of a
higher average balance of cash, cash equivalents and investments for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Increasing interest rates and a shift in our
investment portfolio towards higher yielding auction rate securities has also contributed to the
increase in interest income.
Other (Expense) Income, net. Other (expense) income, net, primarily includes foreign currency
exchange gains and losses. Other (expense) income, net, was ($113) thousand for the three months
ended June 30, 2005 compared to ($27) thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Other
(expense) income, net, was ($462) thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $51
thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a net loss of $127 thousand for the
three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to a net gain of $29 thousand for the three months ended
June 30, 2004. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a net loss of $425 thousand
for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to a net gain of $132 thousand for the six
27
months ended June 30, 2004. Due to certain events in late 2004, we changed the functional
currency of our Irish subsidiaries from the Euro to the U.S. Dollar effective January 1, 2005, as
required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, our Irish subsidiaries
incurred no exchange rate gains or losses on transactions denominated in U.S. dollar for the three
or six months ended June 30, 2005. The amount of the foreign currency net gains associated with
transactions denominated in U.S. dollars in our Irish subsidiaries amounted to $83 thousand and
$140 thousand for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. The remainder of
the change in the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations is primarily associated with the
strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to Euro and the Japanese Yen.
Net of the change in net losses related to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the
change in Other expense, net, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period
in 2004, is primarily attributable to losses associated with the cash surrender value of life
insurance policies included in our executive deferred compensation plan.
Income Tax Provision (Benefit). We recorded a tax provision of $933 thousand and a tax
provision of $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. We
recorded a tax provision of $1.9 million and a tax provision of $2.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease in the income tax provision for the first
half of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 is due to generating less pre-tax income. The
Companys expected effective tax rate for the year ended 2005 is 26.8% compared to 20.0% for the
year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in the effective tax rate between the first six months
of 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004 is primarily due to a decrease in estimated income
generated in certain foreign jurisdictions, a decrease in tax benefit related to certain qualified
export sales and a decrease in tax credits. The 2005 estimated effective tax rate is based on
current tax law and the current expected income, and assumes that the Company continues to receive
the tax benefits associated with certain income associated with foreign jurisdictions. The tax rate
may be affected by potential acquisitions, restructuring events or divestitures, the jurisdictions
in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed, and the ability to realize deferred tax
assets.
On October 22, 2004, the President of the United States signed the American Jobs Creation Act
of 2004 (the Act). One of the key provisions of the Act includes a repeal of the extraterritorial
income exclusion with certain transitional rules. In its place, the Act provides a relief provision
for domestic manufacturers by providing a new domestic manufacturing deduction. The Act also
includes a temporary incentive for U.S. multinationals to repatriate foreign earnings and other
international tax reforms designed to improve the global competitiveness of U.S. multinationals. We
are currently evaluating the impact of the Act on our effective tax rate, cash flows and financial
statements. On October 4, 2004 the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 was enacted which
extended several expired business related tax breaks, including the research and development tax
credit. Under the new law the research and development tax credit was retroactively reinstated to
June 30, 2004 and is available through December 31, 2005. For the year ended December 31, 2004 we
recorded a research and development tax credit in the amount of $407 thousand, a portion of which
would not have been recorded had the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 not been enacted. We
expect to record a federal research and development credit of approximately $355 thousand for the
year ended 2005.
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign
Earnings Repatriation Provision within the Act (FSP 109-2), provides guidance under FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, with respect to recording the potential impact of
the repatriation provisions of the Act on enterprises income tax expense and deferred tax
liability. FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting
period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation
of foreign earnings for purposes of applying FASB Statement No. 109. The Company is in the process
of evaluating the impact of the repatriation provisions and expects to complete the evaluation by
the end of 2005.
Given the preliminary stage of our evaluation, it is not possible at this time to determine
what impact the repatriation provisions will have on our consolidated tax accruals or our effective
tax rate. Accordingly, as provided for in FSP 109-2, the Company has not adjusted its tax expense
or deferred tax liability to reflect the repatriation provisions of the Act as of June 30, 2005.
The IRS has completed its examination of our federal income tax returns for the years 1996
through 2002. The final audit report resulted in no negative consequences and was issued during the
first quarter of 2004. The final results of the examination are subject to review and approval by
the Joint Committee of Taxation. Although the Company has not received final approval from the
Joint Committee of Taxation, the statute of limitations on assessment and collection of income
taxes for all tax years 2002 and prior expired on April 1, 2005.
28
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes selected financial information for each of the three months
ended on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
Working capital |
|
$ |
210,683 |
|
|
$ |
186,634 |
|
|
$ |
176,871 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
211,778 |
|
|
$ |
198,619 |
|
|
$ |
181,358 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
69,184 |
|
|
$ |
80,566 |
|
|
$ |
119,307 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
117,094 |
|
|
$ |
78,303 |
|
|
$ |
26,201 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
43,366 |
|
|
$ |
42,902 |
|
|
$ |
37,845 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
20,149 |
|
|
$ |
22,154 |
|
|
$ |
21,796 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
39,750 |
|
|
$ |
35,850 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
36,172 |
|
|
$ |
31,585 |
|
|
$ |
26,265 |
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
$ |
97,213 |
|
|
$ |
97,148 |
|
|
$ |
97,083 |
|
Convertible subordinated notes |
|
$ |
8,776 |
|
|
$ |
9,867 |
|
|
$ |
9,845 |
|
Days sales outstanding (1) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Days to pay (2) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Inventory turns (3) |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Inventory turns days (4) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Cash cycle time days (5) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on ending net trade receivables divided by (quarterly revenue, annualized and divided
by 365 days). |
|
(2) |
|
Based on ending accounts payable divided by (quarterly cost of sales, annualized and divided
by 365 days). |
|
(3) |
|
Based on quarterly cost of sales, annualized divided by ending inventory. |
|
(4) |
|
Based on ending inventory divided by (quarterly cost of sales, annualized and divided by 365
days). |
|
(5) |
|
Days sales outstanding plus inventory turns days, less days to pay. |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $11 million from $80.6 million at December 31, 2004 to
$69.2 million at June 30, 2005. Activities impacting cash and cash equivalents are as follows: |
29
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
14,212 |
|
|
$ |
10,665 |
|
Cash (used in ) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(27,661 |
) |
|
|
10,337 |
|
Cash (used in ) provided by financing activities |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
(51,451 |
) |
Effects of exchange rate changes |
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(11,382 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have generated cash from operating activities in amounts greater than net income in
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, driven mainly by improved management of our working
capital. We currently believe that cash flows from operations, available cash balances, and
short-term borrowings will be sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005 we used net cash provided by operating activities
for capital expenditures amounting to $3.1 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2005,
capital expenditures included our continued investment in equipment to support the Companys China
based manufacturing partner as well as leasehold improvements, office equipment and software to
support our continued growth and productivity.
Net cash provided by operating activities was also used for severance payments amounting to
approximately $1.2 million associated with our 2004 restructuring activities. As we continue to
transition our production to our contract manufacturing partners we will continue to require cash
in order make this transition. During the second quarter of 2005 the Company entered a
restructuring plan that included the elimination of 93 employees. As these employee positions are
eliminated over the next four quarters we will be required to make severance payments totaling
approximately $1 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005 we also used $1.1 million to repurchase our 5.5%
convertible subordinated notes. The Board of Directors has approved the repurchase of the remaining
$8.8 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes and $5.0 million of our
outstanding shares of common stock. We will consider the purchase of the notes and common stock on
the open market or through privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject to market
conditions. In addition to the potential repurchase of our outstanding common stock and convertible
subordinated notes we intend to use our working capital to expand our product offerings through
research and development and potential acquisitions.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005 we received $4.1 million in proceeds from the
issuance of common stock through the Companys stock compensation plans.
Changes in foreign currency rates impacted beginning cash balances during the six months ended
June 30, 2005, by $910 thousand. Due to the Companys international operations where transactions
are recorded in functional currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, the effects of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates on existing cash balances during any given periods results in amounts on
the consolidated statements of cash flows that may not reflect the changes in the corresponding
accounts on the consolidated balance sheets.
During the first six months of 2004, we used net cash provided by operating activities for
capital expenditures amounting to $2.1 million. During the first six months of 2004, capital
expenditures primarily related to computer hardware, software, and test equipment to be used to
design our standard products. Additionally, during the first six months of 2004, we received $6.7
million in cash proceeds from the sale of our common stock associated with our stock compensation
plans.
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 working capital was $210.7 million and $186.6
million, respectively. Working capital increased by $24.0 million due to our net positive cash flow
from operating and financing activities generated during the first two quarters of 2005.
Management believes that cash flows from operations, available cash balances, and short-term
borrowings will be sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs for the short-term and
long-term future.
30
Held-to-Maturity Investments
Held-to-maturity investments consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Short-term held-to-maturity investments, including unamortized premium of $56 and $103, respectively |
|
$ |
26,544 |
|
|
$ |
17,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term available-for-sale investments |
|
$ |
90,550 |
|
|
$ |
61,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term held-to-maturity investments* |
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
39,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Long term investments were purchased at par value and therefore there is no discount or
premium associated with these investments. |
We invest excess cash in debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies, those of
high-quality corporate issuers and municipalities. The Companys investments in the debt
instruments of municipalities primarily consist of investments in auction rate securities. Auction
rate securities generally have maturity dates far into the future but due to a resetting interest
rate feature associated with these instruments they are readily tradable and rarely have
differences between there par value and fair market value. As we do not intend to hold these
investments until maturity they are classified as available-for-sale and any unrealized holding
gains and losses are recorded, net of tax, as a separate component of accumulated other
comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2005, the Companys long-term held-to-maturity investments had
maturities ranging from 13 months to 14 months. The Companys investment policy requires that the
total investment portfolio, including cash and investments, not exceed a maximum weighted-average
maturity of 18 months. In addition, the policy mandates that an individual investment must have a
maturity of less than 36 months, with no more than 20% of the total portfolio exceeding 24 months.
As of June 30, 2005, the Company was in compliance with its investment policy.
31
Line of Credit
During the first quarter of 2005, we renewed our line of credit facility, which expires on
March 31, 2006, for $20.0 million at an interest rate based upon the lower of the London Inter-Bank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.0% or the banks prime rate. The line of credit is collateralized by
our non-equity investments and is reduced by any standby letters of credit. At June 30, 2005, we
had a standby letter of credit outstanding related to one of our medical insurance carriers for
$105 thousand. The par value of non-equity investments must exceed 125.0% of the borrowed facility
amount, and the investments must meet specified investment grade ratings.
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding balances on the standby
letter of credit or line of credit and we were in compliance with all debt covenants.
Convertible Senior Notes
During November 2003, we completed a private offering of $100 million aggregate principal
amount of 1.375% convertible senior notes due November 15, 2023 to qualified institutional buyers.
The discount on the convertible senior notes amounted to $3 million.
Convertible senior notes are unsecured obligations convertible into our Common Stock and rank
equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future obligations that are unsecured and
unsubordinated. Interest on the senior notes accrues at 1.375% per year and is payable
semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. The convertible senior notes are payable in full in
November 2023. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to
maturity under certain circumstances, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of our
Common Stock at a conversion price of $23.57 per share, which is equal to a conversion rate of
42.4247 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. The notes are convertible prior to maturity
into shares of our Common Stock under certain circumstances that include but are not limited to (i)
conversion due to the closing price of our Common Stock on the trading day prior to the conversion
date reaching 120% or more of the conversion price of the notes on such trading date and (ii)
conversion due to the trading price of the notes falling below 98% of the conversion value. We may
redeem all or a portion of the notes at our option on or after November 15, 2006 but before
November 15, 2008 provided that the closing price of our Common Stock exceeds 130% of the
conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending
on the trading day before the date of the notice of the provisional redemption. On or after
November 15, 2008, we may redeem the notes at any time. On November 15, 2008, November 15, 2013,
and November 15, 2018, holders of the convertible senior notes will have the right to require the
Company to purchase, in cash, all or any part of the notes held by such holder at a purchase price
equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being purchased, together with accrued and
unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, up to but excluding the purchase date.
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the Company had outstanding convertible senior notes
with a face value of $100 million. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the book value of the
convertible senior notes was $97.2 million and $97.1 million respectively, net of unamortized
discount of $2.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively. The estimated fair value of the
convertible senior notes was $97.8 million and $106.8 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively.
Convertible Subordinated Notes
During August 2000, we completed a private offering of $120 million aggregate principal amount
of 5.5% convertible subordinated notes due August 15, 2007 to qualified institutional buyers. The
discount on the convertible subordinated notes amounted to $3.6 million.
Convertible subordinated notes are unsecured obligations convertible into our Common Stock and
are subordinated to all present and future senior indebtedness of RadiSys. Interest on the
subordinated notes accrues at 5.5% per year and is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August
15. The convertible subordinated notes are payable in full in August 2007. The notes are
convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or before maturity, unless previously
redeemed or repurchased, into shares of our Common Stock at a conversion price of $67.80 per share,
which is equal to a conversion rate of 14.7484 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. If the
closing price of our common stock equals or exceeds 140% of the conversion price for at least 20
trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the
date on which a notice of redemption is mailed, then we may redeem all or a portion of the notes at
our option at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the notes plus a premium (which
declines annually on August 15 of each year), together with accrued and unpaid interest to, but
excluding, the redemption date.
32
In the second quarter of 2005, the Company repurchased $125 thousand principal amount of the
convertible subordinated notes at face value, with an associated discount of $1 thousand. The
Company recognized a loss of $1 thousand associated with this buy back.
In the first quarter of 2005, the Company repurchased $1.0 million principal amount of the
convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $12 thousand. The Company
repurchased the notes in the open market for $990 thousand and, as a result, recorded a loss of $3
thousand.
In 2004, we repurchased $58.8 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes,
with an associated discount of $897 thousand. We repurchased the notes in the open market for $58.2
million and, as a result, recorded a loss of $387 thousand.
In 2003, we repurchased $10.3 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes,
with an associated discount of $212 thousand. We repurchased the notes in the open market for $9.2
million and, as a result, recorded a gain of $825 thousand. In 2002, we repurchased $21.0 million
principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $587
thousand for $17.5 million in cash as part of negotiated transactions with third parties. The early
extinguishments of the notes resulted in a gain of $3.0 million. In 2000, we purchased $20.0 million
principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $581
thousand for $14.3 million as part of a negotiated transaction with a third party. The early
extinguishment of the notes resulted in a gain of $5.1 million.
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 we had outstanding convertible subordinated notes
with a face value of $8.9 million and $10.0 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the book value of the convertible subordinated notes was $8.8 million and $9.9 million,
respectively, net of amortized discount of $92 thousand and $126 thousand, respectively. The
estimated fair value of the convertible subordinated notes was $8.9 million and $10.0 million at
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
On April 26, 2005 the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of the remaining $8.9 million
principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes. The Company will consider the purchase of
the notes on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject
to market conditions.
Stock Repurchase Program
On April 26, 2005 the Board of Directors also authorized the repurchase of up to $5 million of
our outstanding shares of common stock. The Company will consider the purchase of common stock on
the open market or through privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject to market
conditions.
Contractual Obligations
The following summarizes RadiSys contractual obligations at June 30, 2005 and the effect of
such on its liquidity and cash flows in future periods (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005* |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
Thereafter |
Future minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
1,636 |
|
|
$ |
2,217 |
|
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
1,940 |
|
|
$ |
1,883 |
|
|
$ |
3,452 |
|
Purchase obligations(1) |
|
|
22,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on convertible notes |
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
19,250 |
|
Convertible senior notes(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,344 |
|
|
$ |
4,080 |
|
|
$ |
12,687 |
|
|
$ |
103,315 |
|
|
$ |
3,258 |
|
|
$ |
22,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Remaining six months |
|
(1) |
|
Purchase obligations include agreements or purchase orders to purchase goods or services that
are enforceable and legally binding and specify all significant terms, including: fixed or
minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions and the
approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are
cancelable without penalty. |
|
(2) |
|
The convertible senior notes and the convertible subordinated notes are shown at their face
values, gross of unamortized discount amounting to $2.8 million and $92 thousand, respectively
at June 30, 2005. On or after November 15, 2008, we may redeem the convertible senior notes at
any time. On November 15, 2008, November 15, 2013, and November 15, 2018, holders of the |
33
|
|
|
|
|
convertible senior notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase, in cash, all or
any part of the notes held by such holder at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the notes being purchased, together with accrued and unpaid interest and additional
interest, if any, up to but excluding the purchase date. The convertible subordinated notes are
payable in full in August 2007. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not engage in any activity involving special purpose entities or off-balance sheet
financing.
Liquidity Outlook
We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents and investments, net, amounting to
$211.8 million at June 30, 2005 and cash generated from operations will satisfy our short and
long-term expected working capital needs, capital expenditures, stock and debt repurchases, and
other liquidity requirements associated with our existing business operations. Capital expenditures
are expected to range from $1 million to $1.5 million per quarter.
34
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements. Our statements
concerning our beliefs about the success of our shift in business strategy from perfect-fit
solutions to standards-based solutions, expectations and goals for revenues, gross margin, research
and development expenses, selling, general, and administrative expenses, the impact of our
restructuring events on future revenues, the anticipated cost savings effects of our restructuring
activities, and our projected liquidity are some of the forward-looking statements contained in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All statements that relate to future events or to our future
performance are forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by terms such as may, will, should, expect, plans, seeks, anticipate,
believe, estimate, predict, potential, continue, seek to continue, intends, or other
comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to safe-harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our
actual results or our industries actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements
to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or
achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include discussions of our
goals, including those discussions set forth in Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations. We cannot provide assurance that these goals will be
achieved.
Although forward-looking statements help provide complete information about us, investors
should keep in mind that forward-looking statements are only predictions, at a point in time, and
are inherently less reliable than historical information. In evaluating these statements, you
should specifically consider the risks outlined above and those listed under Risk Factors. These
risk factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement.
We do not guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements and we do
not assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements. The
forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on information
as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update any of these statements based on
information after the date of this report.
35
RISK FACTORS
Risk Factors Related to Our Business
Because of our dependence on certain customers, the loss of, or a substantial decline in sales to,
a top customer could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
During 2004, we derived 58.2% of our revenues from five customers. These five customers were
Nokia, Nortel, IBM, Comverse and Diebold. During 2004, revenues attributable to Nokia and Nortel
were 28.5% and 13.7%, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, we derived 64.7% of
our revenue from five customers. These five customers were Nokia, Nortel, Comverse, Avaya and
Philips. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, revenues attributable to Nokia and Nortel were
32.2% and 16.3%, respectively. We believe that sales to these customers will continue to be a
substantial percentage of our revenues. A financial hardship experienced by, or a substantial
decrease in sales to any one of our top customers could materially affect revenues and
profitability.
We are shifting our business from predominately perfect fit solutions to more standards-based
products, such as ATCA products, which requires substantial expenditures for research and
development which could adversely affect our short-term earnings and, if the strategy is not
accepted by our customers or properly executed by the Company, it could have a material adverse
effect on our long-term revenues, profitability and financial condition.
We are shifting our business from predominately perfect fit solutions to more standards-based
solutions, such as ATCA products. There can be no assurance that this strategy will be successful.
This strategy requires us to make substantial expenditures for research and development in new
technologies that we reflect as a current expense in our financial statements. We believe that
these investments in standards-based products and new technologies will allow us to provide a
broader set of products and building blocks to take to market and allow us to grow on a long-term
basis. Revenues from some of these investments, such as ATCA, are not expected to result in any
significant opportunities for at least twelve to eighteen months. Accordingly, these expenditures
could adversely affect our short-term earnings. In addition, there is no assurance that these new
products and technologies will be accepted by our customers and, if accepted, how large the market
will be for these products or what the timing will be for any meaningful revenues. If we are unable
to successfully develop and sell standards-based products to our customers, our revenues,
profitability and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our projections of future revenues and earnings are highly subjective and may not reflect future
results that may result in volatility in the price of our common stock.
Most of our major customers have contracts but these contracts do not commit them to purchase
a minimum amount of our products. These contracts generally require our customers to provide us
with forecasts of their anticipated purchases. However, our recent experience indicates that
customers can change their purchasing patterns quickly in response to market demands and therefore
these forecasts may not be relied upon to accurately forecast sales. From time to time we provide
projections to our shareholders and the investment community of our future sales and earnings.
Since we do not have long-term purchase commitments from our major customers and the customer order
cycle is short, it is difficult for us to accurately predict the amount of our sales and related
earnings in any given period. Our projections are based on managements best estimate of sales
using historical sales data, information from customers and other information deemed relevant.
These projections are highly subjective since sales to our customers can fluctuate substantially
based on the demands of their customers and the relevant markets. If our actual sales or earnings
are less than the projected amounts, the price of our common stock may be adversely affected.
Not all new product development projects ramp into production, and if ramped into production the
volumes derived from such projects may not be as significant as we had originally estimated, which
could have a substantial negative impact on our anticipated revenues and profitability.
If a product development project actually ramps into production, the average ramp into
production begins about 12 months after the project launch, although some more complex projects can
take up to 24 months or longer. After that, there is an additional time lag from the start of
production ramp to peak revenue. Not all projects ramp into production and even if a project is
ramped into production, the volumes derived from such projects may not be as significant as we had
originally estimated. Projects are sometimes canceled or delayed, or can perform below original
expectations, which can adversely impact anticipated revenues and profitability.
Our business depends on the service provider, commercial and enterprise systems markets in which
demand can be cyclical, and any inability to sell products to these markets could have a material
adverse effect on our revenues.
36
We derive our revenues from a number of diverse end markets, some of which are subject to
significant cyclical changes in demand. In 2004, we derived 43.4%, 31.9% and 24.7% of our revenues
from the service provider, the commercial and the enterprise systems markets, respectively. For the
six months ended June 30, 2005, we derived 48.5%, 27.3% and 24.2% of our revenues from the service
provider, the commercial and the enterprise systems markets, respectively. We believe that our
revenues will continue to be derived primarily from these three markets. Service provider revenues
include, but are not limited to, telecommunications sales to Comverse, Lucent, Nokia and Nortel.
Commercial systems revenues include, but are not limited to, sales to Agilent Technologies, Beckman
Coulter, Diebold, Philips Medical and Seimens AG. Enterprise systems revenues include, but are not
limited to, sales to Avaya, IBM and Nortel. Generally, our customers are not the end-users of our
products. If our customers experience adverse economic conditions in the markets into which they
sell our products (end markets), we would expect a significant reduction in spending by our
customers. Some of these end markets are characterized by intense competition, rapid technological
change and economic uncertainty. Our exposure to economic cyclicality and any related fluctuation
in customer demand in these end markets could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and
financial condition. Significant reduction in our customers spending, such as what we experienced
in 2001 and 2002, will result in decreased revenues and earnings. We continue to execute on our
strategy of expanding into new end markets either through new product development projects with our
existing customers or through new customer relationships, but no assurance can be given that this
strategy will be successful.
Because of our dependence on a few suppliers, or in some cases one supplier, for some of the
components we use, as well as our dependence on a few contract manufacturers to supply a majority
of our products, a loss of a supplier, a decline in the quality of these components, a shortage of
any of these components, or a loss of a contract manufacturer could have a material adverse effect
on our business or our financial performance.
We depend on a few suppliers, or in some cases one supplier, for a continuing supply of the
components we use in the manufacture of our products and any disruption in supply or decline in
quality of components supplied could adversely impact our financial performance. For example, we
are dependent solely on Intel for the supply of some microprocessors and other components, and we
depend on LSI, Epson Electronic America, Broadcom, NEC, Chen Ming, Triax and Texas Instruments as
the sole source suppliers for other components such as integrated circuits and mechanical
assemblies. Alternative sources of supply for some of these components would be difficult to locate
and/or it would require a significant amount of time and resources to establish an alternative
supply line. We also rely on contract manufacturers as the sole suppliers of certain RadiSys
products. For example Foxconn produces certain products that we do not produce internally and that
no other contact manufacturer produces for us. Alternative sources of supply for the RadiSys
products that our contract manufacturers produce would be difficult to locate and/or it would
require a significant amount of time and resources to establish an alternative supply line,
including transitioning the products to be internally produced. In addition, any decline in the
quality of components supplied by our vendors or products produced by our contract manufacturing
partners could adversely impact our reputation.
We are shifting a significant portion of our manufacturing to third party contract manufacturers
and our inability to properly transfer our manufacturing or any failed or less than optimal
execution on their behalf could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
We have traditionally manufactured a substantial portion of our products. To lower our costs
and provide better value and more competitive products for our customers and to achieve higher
levels of global fulfillment, we are shifting a significant amount of our manufacturing to third
party contract manufacturers. As of June 30, 2005, our contract manufacturing partners were
manufacturing approximately 74% of total unit volumes. We expect to increase our outsourcing to our
contract manufacturers to 80% or more of our unit volume by the end of 2005. If we do not properly
transfer our manufacturing expertise to these third party manufacturers or they fail to adequately
perform, our revenues and profitability could be adversely affected. Among other things, inadequate
performance from our contract manufacturers could include the production of products that do not
meet our high quality standards or unanticipated scheduling delays in production and delivery. We
also rely on contract manufacturers as the sole suppliers of certain RadiSys products. For example
Foxconn produces certain products that we do not produce internally and that no other contact
manufacturer produces for us. Alternative sources of supply for the RadiSys products that our
contract manufacturers produce would be difficult to locate and/or it would require a significant
amount of time and resources to establish an alternative supply line, including transitioning the
products to be internally produced. We currently utilize several contract manufacturers for
outsourced board and system production; however, we depend on two primary contract manufacturing
partners, Foxconn, and Celestica, Inc.
Competition in the market for embedded systems is intense, and if we lose our position, our
revenues and profitability could decline.
37
We compete with a number of companies providing embedded systems, including Advantech Co.,
Artesyn Technologies, Continuous Computing, Embedded Communications Computing Group , a unit of
Motorola, Hewlett Packard, divisions within Intel Corporation and IBM, Kontron AG, Mercury Computer
Systems and SBS Technologies. Because the embedded systems market is growing, it is attracting new
non-traditional competitors. These non-traditional competitors include contract-manufacturers that
provide design services and Asian-based original design manufacturers. Some of our competitors and
potential competitors have a number of significant advantages over us, including:
|
|
|
a longer operating history; |
|
|
|
|
greater name recognition and marketing power; |
|
|
|
|
preferred vendor status with our existing and potential customers; and |
|
|
|
|
significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, which allow
them to respond more quickly to new or changing opportunities, technologies and customer
requirements. |
Furthermore, existing or potential competitors may establish cooperative relationships with
each other or with third parties or adopt aggressive pricing policies to gain market share.
As a result of increased competition, we could encounter significant pricing pressures. These
pricing pressures could result in significantly lower average selling prices for our products. We
may not be able to offset the effects of any price reductions with an increase in the number of
customers, cost reductions or otherwise. In addition, many of the industries we serve, such as the
communications industry, are encountering market consolidation, or are likely to encounter
consolidation in the near future, which could result in increased pricing pressure and additional
competition.
Potential acquisitions and partnerships may be more costly or less profitable than anticipated
and may adversely affect the price of our company stock.
Future acquisitions and partnerships may involve the use of significant amounts of cash,
potentially dilutive issuances of equity or equity-linked securities, issuance of debt and
amortization of intangible assets with determinable lives. Moreover, to the extent that any
proposed acquisition or strategic investment is not favorably received by shareholders, analysts
and others in the investment community, the price of our common stock could be adversely affected.
In addition, acquisitions or strategic investments involve numerous risks, including:
|
|
|
difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies, products and personnel of the acquired company; |
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from other business concerns; |
|
|
|
|
risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and |
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company. |
In the event that an acquisition or a partnership does occur and we are unable to successfully
integrate operations, technologies, products or personnel that we acquire, our business, results of
operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our international operations expose us to additional political, economic and regulatory risks not
faced by businesses that operate only in the United States.
In 2004, we derived 5.0% of our revenues from Canada and Mexico, 50.1% of our revenues from
EMEA and 6.1% from Asia Pacific. In addition, during 2004 we opened a design center in Shanghai,
China and began to utilize a contract manufacturer in Shenzhen, China. For the six months ended
June 30, 2005 approximately 31% of our total revenues were associated with products produced at our
new China contract manufacturer. As a result, we are subject to worldwide economic and market
condition risks generally associated with global trade, such as fluctuating exchange rates, tariff
and trade policies, domestic and foreign tax policies, foreign governmental regulations, political
unrest, wars and other acts of terrorism and changes in other economic conditions. These risks,
among others, could adversely affect our results of operations or financial position. Additionally,
some of our sales to overseas
38
customers are made under export licenses that must be obtained from the United States
Department of Commerce. Protectionist trade legislation in either the United States or other
countries, such as a change in the current tariff structures, export compliance laws, trade
restrictions resulting from war or terrorism, or other trade policies could adversely affect our
ability to sell or to manufacture in international markets. Furthermore, revenues from outside the
United States are subject to inherent risks, including the general economic and political
conditions in each country. These risks, among others, could adversely affect our results of
operations or financial position.
If we are unable to generate sufficient income in the future, we may not be able to fully utilize
our net deferred tax assets or support our current levels of goodwill and intangible assets on our
balance sheet.
We cannot provide absolute assurance that we will generate sufficient taxable income in the
future to fully utilize the net deferred tax assets of $27.0 million as of June 30, 2005. We may
not generate sufficient taxable income due to earning lower than forecasted net income or incurring
charges associated with unusual events, such as restructurings and acquisitions. Accordingly, we
may record a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets if our expectations of future
taxable income are not achieved. On the other hand, if we generate taxable income in excess of our
expectations, the valuation allowance may be reduced accordingly. We also cannot provide absolute
assurance that future income will support the carrying amount of goodwill and intangibles of $30.7
million on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2005, and therefore, we may incur an
impairment charge in the future.
Our products for embedded computing applications are based on industry standards, which are
continually evolving, and any failure to conform to these standards could have a substantial
negative impact on our revenues and profitability.
We develop and supply a mix of perfect fit and standards-based products. Standards-based
products for embedded computing applications are often based on industry standards, which are
continually evolving. Our future success in these products will depend, in part, upon our capacity
to invest in, and successfully develop and introduce new products based on emerging industry
standards. Our inability to invest in or conform to these standards could render parts of our
product portfolio uncompetitive, unmarketable or obsolete. As our addressable markets develop new
standards, we may be unable to successfully invest in, design and manufacture new products that
address the needs of our customers or achieve substantial market acceptance.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we may lose a valuable competitive
advantage or be forced to incur costly litigation to protect our rights.
We are a technology dependent company, and our success depends on developing and protecting
our intellectual property. We rely on patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to
protect our intellectual property. At the same time, our products are complex, and are often not
patentable in their entirety. We also license intellectual property from third parties and rely on
those parties to maintain and protect their technology. We cannot be certain that our actions will
protect proprietary rights. If we are unable to adequately protect our technology, or if we are
unable to continue to obtain or maintain licenses for protected technology from third parties, it
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our period-to-period revenues, operating results and earnings per share fluctuate significantly,
which may result in volatility in the price of our common stock.
The price of our common stock may be subject to wide, rapid fluctuations. Our period-to-period
revenues and operating results have varied in the past and may continue to vary in the future, and
any such fluctuations may cause our stock price to fluctuate. Fluctuations in the stock price may
also be due to other factors, such as changes in analysts estimates regarding earnings, or may be
due to factors relating to the service provider, commercial and enterprise systems markets in
general. Shareholders should be willing to incur the risk of such fluctuations.
Oregon corporate law, our articles of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that could
prevent or discourage a third party from acquiring us even if the change of control would be
beneficial to our shareholders.
Our articles of incorporation and our bylaws contain anti-takeover provisions that could delay
or prevent a change of control of our company, even if a change of control would be beneficial to
our shareholders. These provisions:
|
|
|
authorize our board of directors to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and
to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting
rights, of those shares without prior shareholder approval to increase the number of
outstanding shares and deter or prevent a takeover attempt; |
39
|
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of
directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by shareholders at shareholder
meetings; |
|
|
|
|
prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow less
than a majority of shareholders to elect director candidates; and |
|
|
|
|
limit the ability of shareholders to take action by written consent, thereby effectively
requiring all common shareholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our common
shareholders. |
In addition, if our common stock is acquired in specified transactions deemed to constitute
control share acquisitions, provisions of Oregon law condition the voting rights that would
otherwise be associated with those common shares upon approval by our shareholders (excluding,
among other things, the acquirer in any such transaction). Provisions of Oregon law also restrict,
subject to specified exceptions, the ability of a person owning 15% or more of our common stock to
enter into any business combination transaction with us.
The foregoing provisions of Oregon law and our articles of incorporation and bylaws could
limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common
stock.
In recent years, various state, federal and international laws and regulations governing the
collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of certain materials used in the manufacturing of
electrical and electronic components have been enacted. In support of these laws and regulations,
we will incur significant additional expenditures and we may incur additional capital expenditures
and asset impairments to ensure that our products and our vendors products are in compliance with
these regulations, and we may also incur significant penalties in connection with any violations
of these laws. Additionally, failure to comply with these regulations could have an adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a result, our financial
condition or operating results may be negatively impacted.
The most significant pieces of legislation relate to two European Union (EU) directives
aimed at wastes from electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) and the restriction of the use of
certain hazardous substances (RoHS). Specifically, the RoHS directive prohibits the use of
certain types of materials, such as lead, in the manufacturing of electronic products. As of July
1, 2006 products sold within the EU, a market in which we sell a significant amount of our
products, must be RoHS compliant. Failure to comply with such legislation could result in our
customers refusing to purchase our products and subject us to significant monetary penalties in
connection with a violation, both of which could have a materially adverse affect on our business,
financial condition and results from operations.
Other Risk Factors Related to Our Business
Other risk factors include, but are not limited to, changes in the mix of products sold,
regulatory and tax legislation, changes in effective tax rates, inventory risks due to changes in
market demand or our business strategies, potential litigation and claims arising in the normal
course of business, credit risk of customers and other risk factors. Proposed changes to accounting
rules, including proposals to account for employee stock options as a compensation expense, could
materially increase the expense that we report under generally accepted accounting principles and
adversely affect our operating results.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates,
and equity trading prices, which could affect our financial position and results of operations.
Interest Rate Risk. We invest excess cash in debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its
agencies, those of high-quality corporate issuers and municipalities. The Companys investments in
the debt instruments of municipalities primarily consist of investments in auction rate securities.
We attempt to protect and preserve our invested funds by limiting default, market, and reinvestment
risk. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree
of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair value adversely affected due to a
rise in interest rates while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if
interest rates decline. Due to the short duration of most of the investment portfolio, an immediate
10% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair value of our investment
portfolio. Therefore, we would not expect our operating results or cash flows to be affected, to
any significant degree, by the effect of a sudden change in market interest rates on the
40
securities portfolio. The estimated fair value of our debt securities that we have invested in
at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $176.0 million and $168.4 million, respectively. The
effect of an immediate 10% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on our
operating results or cash flows.
Foreign Currency Risk. We pay the expenses of our international operations in local
currencies, namely, the Japanese Yen, Canadian Dollar, British Pound, New Shekel, Chinese Yuan and
Euro. The international operations are subject to risks typical of an international business,
including, but not limited to: differing economic conditions, changes in political climate,
differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate volatility.
Accordingly, future results could be materially and adversely affected by changes in these or other
factors. We are also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the balance sheets and income
statements of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars during the consolidation
process. Because exchange rates vary, these results, when translated, may vary from expectations
and adversely affect overall expected profitability. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
resulted in a net loss of $127 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and a net gain of
$29 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
resulted in a net loss of $425 thousand in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and a net gain of
$132 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Convertible Senior Notes. During November 2003, we completed a private offering of $100
million aggregate principal amount of 1.375% convertible senior notes due November 15, 2023 to
qualified institutional buyers. The discount on the convertible senior notes amounted to $3
million.
Convertible senior notes are unsecured obligations convertible into our Common Stock and rank
equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future obligations that are unsecured and
unsubordinated. Interest on the senior notes accrues at 1.375% per year and is payable
semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. The convertible senior notes are payable in full in
November 2023. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to
maturity, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of our Common Stock at a
conversion price of $23.57 per share, which is equal to a conversion rate of 42.4247 shares per
$1,000 principal amount of notes. The notes are convertible prior to maturity into shares of our
Common Stock under certain circumstances that include but are not limited to (i) conversion due to
the closing price of our Common Stock on the trading day prior to the conversion date reaching 120%
or more of the conversion price of the notes on such trading date and (ii) conversion due to the
trading price of the notes falling below 98% of the conversion value. We may redeem all or a
portion of the notes at our option on or after November 15, 2006 but before November 15, 2008
provided that the closing price of our Common Stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price for at
least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day
before the date of the notice of the provisional redemption. On or after November 15, 2008, we may
redeem the notes at any time. On November 15, 2008, November 15, 2013, and November 15, 2018,
holders of the convertible senior notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase, in
cash, all or any part of the notes held by such holder at a purchase price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the notes being purchased, together with accrued and unpaid interest and
additional interest, if any, up to but excluding the purchase date.
The fair value of the convertible senior notes is sensitive to interest rate changes. Interest
rate changes would result in increases or decreases in the fair value of the convertible senior
notes, due to differences between market interest rates and rates in effect at the inception of the
obligation. Unless we elect to repurchase our convertible senior notes in the open market, changes
in the fair value of convertible senior notes have no impact on our cash flows or consolidated
financial statements. The estimated fair value of the convertible senior notes was $97.8 million
and $106.8 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Convertible Subordinated Notes. Convertible subordinated notes are unsecured obligations
convertible into our Common Stock and are subordinated to all present and future senior
indebtedness of RadiSys. Interest on the subordinated notes accrues at 5.5% per year and is payable
semi-annually on February 15 and August 15. The convertible subordinated notes are payable in full
in August 2007. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or before
maturity, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of our Common Stock at a
conversion price of $67.80 per share, which is equal to a conversion rate of 14.7484 shares per
$1,000 principal amount of notes. If the closing price of our common stock equals or exceeds 140%
of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days
ending on the trading day before the date on which a notice of redemption is mailed, then we may
redeem all or a portion of the notes at our option at a redemption price equal to the principal
amount of the notes plus a premium (which declines annually on August 15 of each year), together
with accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.
The fair value of the convertible subordinated notes is sensitive to interest rate changes.
Interest rate changes would result in increases or decreases in the fair value of the convertible
subordinated notes, due to differences between market interest rates and rates in effect at the
inception of the obligation. Unless we elect to repurchase our convertible subordinated notes in
the open market, changes in the fair value of convertible subordinated notes have no impact on our
cash flows or consolidated financial statements. The
41
estimated fair value of the convertible subordinated notes was $8.9 million and $10.0 million
at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
We have cumulatively repurchased convertible subordinated notes in the amount of $112 million,
face value, for $100.6 million. These repurchases were financed from our investment portfolio. We
received board authorization to repurchase all remaining convertible subordinated notes. We may
elect to use a portion of our cash and cash equivalents and investment balances to buy back
additional amounts of the convertible subordinated notes. As of June 30, 2005, our aggregate cash
and cash equivalents and investments were $211.8 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
In connection with the evaluation described above, we identified no change in our internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2005, and that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
42
PART II
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the Companys Annual Meeting on May 17, 2005, the holders of the Companys outstanding
Common Stock took the actions described below. As of the record date for the Annual Meeting,
18,418,405 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.
1. |
|
The shareholders elected each of C. Scott Gibson, Scott C. Grout, Ken J. Bradley, Richard J.
Faubert, Dr. William W. Lattin, Kevin C. Melia, Carl W. Neun, and Lorene K Steffes to the
Companys Board of Directors, by the votes indicated below, to serve for the ensuing year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees |
|
Votes Cast |
|
|
C. Scott Gibson
|
|
|
16,930,203 |
|
|
Shares in favor |
|
|
|
1,488,202 |
|
|
Shares against or withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker nonvotes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott C. Grout
|
|
|
17,920,449 |
|
|
Shares in favor |
|
|
|
497,906 |
|
|
Shares against or withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker nonvotes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ken J. Bradley
|
|
|
17,550,897 |
|
|
Shares in favor |
|
|
|
867,508 |
|
|
Shares against or withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker nonvotes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Faubert
|
|
|
17,537,565 |
|
|
Shares in favor |
|
|
|
880,840 |
|
|
Shares against or withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker nonvotes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. William W. Lattin
|
|
|
17,860,557 |
|
|
Shares in favor |
|
|
|
557,848 |
|
|
Shares against or withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker nonvotes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin C. Melia
|
|
|
18,202,155 |
|
|
Shares in favor |
|
|
|
216,250 |
|
|
Shares against or withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker nonvotes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl W. Neun
|
|
|
18,318,391 |
|
|
Shares in favor |
|
|
|
100,014 |
|
|
Shares against or withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker nonvotes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lorene K. Steffes
|
|
|
18,326,912 |
|
|
Shares in favor |
|
|
|
91,493 |
|
|
Shares against or withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker nonvotes |
43
2. |
|
The proposal to ratify the Audit Committees appointment of PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP was
removed from the proposals to be voted. RadiSys filed an amendment to the proxy statement to
remove this proposal as their audit committee made the business decision to change the
Companys independent auditors to KPMG LLP for 2005. |
3. |
|
Approval to amend the Companys 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to add an additional
700,000 shares that may be issued under this plan. |
|
|
|
13,171,807
|
|
Shares in favor |
2,664,196
|
|
Shares against or withheld |
42,220
|
|
Abstentions |
2,540,182
|
|
Broker non-votes |
44
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
RadiSys Corporation 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of
the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of
the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
45
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RADISYS CORPORATION |
|
Dated: August 8, 2005
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ SCOTT C. GROUT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott C. Grout |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2005
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ JULIA A. HARPER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Julia A. Harper |
|
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer |
46
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
RadiSys Corporation 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
47