e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from            to
Commission file number 0-26844
RADISYS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
OREGON   93-0945232
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
5445 N.E. Dawson Creek Drive
Hillsboro, OR 97124

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(503) 615-1100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  þ  No  o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)  Yes  þ  No  o
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of August 2, 2005: 20,187,195
 
 

 


Table of Contents

RADISYS CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page  
       
    3  
    3  
    4  
    5  
    6  
    7  
    21  
    40  
    42  
 
       
       
    43  
    45  
       
 EXHIBIT 10.1
 EXHIBIT 31.1
 EXHIBIT 31.2
 EXHIBIT 32.1
 EXHIBIT 32.2

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
RADISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited)
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended   For the Six Months Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2005   2004
Revenues
  $ 65,956     $ 60,253     $ 123,473     $ 121,368  
Cost of sales
    46,557       40,231       85,532       82,528  
 
                               
Gross margin
    19,399       20,022       37,941       38,840  
Research and development
    7,292       7,135       14,823       13,479  
Selling, general, and administrative
    7,708       7,684       14,962       15,361  
Intangible assets amortization
    513       515       1,026       1,197  
Restructuring and other charges (reversals)
    1,146       (678 )     1,128       (858 )
 
                               
Income from operations
    2,740       5,366       6,002       9,661  
Loss on repurchase of convertible subordinated notes
    (1 )     (387 )     (4 )     (387 )
Interest expense
    (527 )     (1,049 )     (1,069 )     (2,475 )
Interest income
    1,399       772       2,570       1,628  
Other (expense) income, net
    (113 )     (27 )     (462 )     51  
 
                               
Income before income tax provision
    3,498       4,675       7,037       8,478  
Income tax provision
    933       1,168       1,886       2,123  
 
                               
Net income
  $ 2,565     $ 3,507     $ 5,151     $ 6,355  
 
                               
Net income per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.13     $ 0.19     $ 0.26     $ 0.34  
 
                               
Diluted
  $ 0.11     $ 0.16     $ 0.23     $ 0.29  
 
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    19,982       18,826       19,882       18,659  
 
                               
Diluted
    24,620       23,833       24,548       23,765  
 
                               
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

RADISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
                 
    June 30,   December 31,
    2005   2004
    (Unaudited)        
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 69,184     $ 80,566  
Short-term investments, net
    117,094       78,303  
Accounts receivable, net
    43,366       42,902  
Other receivables
    4,991       2,808  
Inventories, net
    20,149       22,154  
Other current assets
    1,750       2,675  
Deferred tax assets
    4,216       4,216  
 
               
Total current assets
    260,750       233,624  
Property and equipment, net
    14,113       14,002  
Goodwill
    27,521       27,521  
Intangible assets, net
    3,185       4,211  
Long-term investments, net
    25,500       39,750  
Long-term deferred tax assets
    22,781       23,224  
Other assets
    3,579       2,906  
 
               
Total assets
  $ 357,429     $ 345,238  
 
               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 36,172     $ 31,585  
Accrued wages and bonuses
    4,800       5,626  
Accrued interest payable
    355       378  
Accrued restructuring
    1,281       1,569  
Other accrued liabilities
    7,459       7,832  
 
               
Total current liabilities
    50,067       46,990  
 
               
Long-term liabilities:
               
Convertible senior notes, net
    97,213       97,148  
Convertible subordinated notes, net
    8,776       9,867  
 
               
Total long-term liabilities
    105,989       107,015  
 
               
Total liabilities
    156,056       154,005  
 
               
Shareholders’ equity :
               
Preferred stock — $.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
           
Common stock — no par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 20,145 and 19,655 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
    187,924       182,705  
Retained earnings
    9,468       4,317  
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
               
Cumulative translation adjustments
    3,981       4,211  
 
               
Total shareholders’ equity
    201,373       191,233  
 
               
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 357,429     $ 345,238  
 
               
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

RADISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, unaudited)
                                                 
                    Cumulative                   Total other
    Common Stock   translation   Retained           comprehensive
    Shares   Amount   adjustments(1)   earnings   Total   income (2)
Balances, December 31, 2004
    19,655     $ 182,705     $ 4,211     $ 4,317     $ 191,233          
Shares issued pursuant to benefit plans
    450       4,092                   4,092     $  
Restricted stock compensation
    41       31                       31          
Restricted stock cancelled
    (1 )                                        
Tax benefit associated with stock-based benefit plans
          1,096                   1,096        
Translation adjustments
                (230 )           (230 )     (230 )
Net income for the period
                      5,151       5,151       5,151  
 
                                               
Balances, June 30, 2005
    20,145     $ 187,924     $ 3,981     $ 9,468     $ 201,373          
 
                                               
Comprehensive income, for the six months ended June 30, 2005
                                          $ 4,921  
 
                                               
 
(1)   Income taxes are not provided for foreign currency translation adjustments.
 
(2)   For the three months ended June 30, 2005, other comprehensive income amounted to $2.4 million and consisted of the net income for the period of $2.6 million and net losses from translation adjustments of $214 thousand. For the three months ended June 30, 2004, other comprehensive income amounted to $3.3 million and consisted of the net income for the period of $3.5 million and net losses from translation adjustments of $207 thousand. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, other comprehensive income amounted to $6.0 million and consisted of net income for the period of $6.4 million and net losses from translation adjustments of $367 thousand.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

RADISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, unaudited)
                 
    For the Six Months Ended
    June 30,
    2005   2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 5,151     $ 6,355  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    4,022       3,845  
Provision for inventory reserves
    1,475       1,501  
Non-cash restructuring charges (adjustments)
    30       (858 )
Non-cash interest expense
    122       216  
Non-cash amortization of premium on investments
    8       912  
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
    1       3  
Loss on early extinguishments of convertible subordinated notes
    4       387  
Deferred income taxes
    444       572  
Stock-based compensation expense
    31       533  
Tax benefit of stock-based benefit plans
    1,096       1,720  
Other
    (286 )     (113 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (498 )     (5,806 )
Other receivables
    (2,183 )     (2,627 )
Inventories
    530       2,861  
Other current assets
    1,086       129  
Accounts payable
    4,609       4,252  
Accrued restructuring
    (268 )     (1,664 )
Accrued interest payable
    (23 )     502  
Accrued wages and bonuses
    (784 )     (1,211 )
Other accrued liabilities
    (355 )     (844 )
 
               
Net cash provided by operating activities
    14,212       10,665  
 
               
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Proceeds from sale or maturity of held-to-maturity investments
    41,500       31,130  
Purchase of held-to-maturity investments
    (36,499 )     (18,645 )
Proceeds from sale of maturity of auction rate securities
    27,400        
Purchase of auction rate securities
    (56,950 )      
Capital expenditures
    (3,083 )     (2,148 )
Other
    (29 )      
 
               
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (27,661 )     10,337  
 
               
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Early extinguishments of convertible subordinated notes
    (1,115 )     (58,168 )
Borrowings under revolving line of credit
          13,000  
Repayments on revolving line of credit
          (13,000 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    4,092       6,717  
 
               
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    2,977       (51,451 )
 
               
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash
    (910 )     (169 )
 
               
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (11,382 )     (30,618 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    80,566       149,925  
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 69,184     $ 119,307  
 
               
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

RADISYS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies
          RadiSys Corporation (the “Company”) has adhered to the accounting policies set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 in preparing the accompanying interim Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of these statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
          The financial information included herein reflects all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for interim periods.
          For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, there have been no changes to these accounting policies.
     Reclassifications
          Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts in prior years to conform to current year presentation. These changes had no effect on previously reported results of operations or shareholders’ equity.
     Inventory Reserves
          The Company records the provision for inventory reserves for estimated obsolete or unmarketable inventories as the difference between the cost of inventories and the estimated net realizable value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Factors influencing the provision include: changes in demand, rapid technological changes, product life cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing, and physical deterioration. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management additional provisions for inventory reserves may be required. The Company’s estimate for the provision is based on the assumption that the Company’s customers comply with their current contractual obligations. The Company provides long-life support to its customers and therefore the Company has material levels of customer specific inventory. If the Company’s customers experience a financial hardship or if the Company experiences unplanned cancellations of customer contracts, the current provision for the inventory reserves may be inadequate. Additionally, the Company may incur additional expenses associated with any non-cancelable purchase obligations to our suppliers if they provide customer-specific components.
     Adverse Purchase Commitments
          The Company is contractually obligated to reimburse its contract manufacturers for the cost of excess inventory used in the manufacture of the Company’s products, for which there is no alternative use. As the Company continues to execute its strategy of increasing the level of outsourced manufacturing the liability for adverse purchase commitments will become more significant. Estimates for adverse purchase commitments are derived from reports received on a quarterly basis from the Company’s contract manufacturers. Increases to this liability are charged to cost of goods sold. When and if the Company takes possession of inventory reserved for in this liability, the liability is transferred from other liabilities to our excess and obsolete inventory reserve. This liability, referred to as adverse purchase commitments, is provided for in other accrued liabilities. Adverse purchase commitments amounted to $599 thousand and $485 thousand at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
     Accrued Restructuring and Other Charges
          In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS No. 146 requires that liabilities for costs associated with exit or disposal activities be recognized and measured initially at fair value in the period in which the liabilities are incurred. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 the Company recorded non-severance related restructuring and other charges in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 146. Because the Company has a history of paying severance benefits, the cost of severance benefits associated with a restructuring charge is recorded when such costs are probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

7


Table of Contents

          Prior to the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded restructuring charges including employee termination and related costs, costs related to leased facilities, losses on impairment of fixed assets and capitalized software and other accounting and legal fees. Employee termination and related costs were previously recorded in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity.” For leased facilities that were vacated and subleased, an amount equal to the total future lease obligations from the date of vacating the premises through the expiration of the lease, net of any future sublease income, was recorded as a part of restructuring charges.
     Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations
          In November 2002, the FASB issued FIN No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” an interpretation of SFAS No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. FIN No. 45 requires that a guarantor recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken by issuing the guarantee and requires additional disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees it has issued. The adoption of FIN No. 45 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The following is a summary of the agreements that the Company has determined are within the scope of FIN No. 45.
          As permitted under Oregon law, the Company has agreements whereby it indemnifies its officers, directors and certain finance employees for certain events or occurrences while the officer, director or employee is or was serving in such capacity at the request of the Company. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer’s, director’s or employee’s lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a Director and Officer insurance policy that limits its exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of the Company’s insurance policy coverage, management believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of June 30, 2005.
          The Company enters into standard indemnification agreements in its ordinary course of business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, generally our business partners or customers, in connection with patent, copyright or other intellectual property infringement claims by any third party with respect to our current products, as well as claims relating to property damage or personal injury resulting from the performance of services by us or our subcontractors. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is generally limited. Historically, our costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims relating to such indemnity agreements have been minimal and accordingly the estimated fair value of these agreements is immaterial.
          The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time it recognizes revenue. Products are generally sold with warranty coverage for a period of 24 months after shipment. Parts and labor are covered under the terms of the warranty agreement. The workmanship of our products produced by contract manufacturers is covered under warranties provided by the contract manufacturer for a specific period of time ranging from 12 to 15 months. The warranty provision is based on historical experience by product family. The Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of its components suppliers; however, ongoing failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failure, as well as specific product class failures out of the Company’s baseline experience affect the estimated warranty obligation. If actual product failure rates, material usage or service delivery costs differ from estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.
          The following is a summary of the change in the Company’s warranty liability for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):
                 
    For the Six Months
    Ended June 30,
    2005   2004
Warranty liability balance, beginning of the period
  $ 1,719     $ 2,276  
Product warranty accruals
    1,678       951  
Adjustments for payments made
    (1,560 )     (1,639 )
 
               
Warranty liability balance, end of the period
  $ 1,837     $ 1,588  
 
               

8


Table of Contents

          The warranty liability balance is included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. The Company offers fixed price support or maintenance contracts to some customers. Revenues from fixed price support or maintenance contracts were not significant to the Company’s operations for the periods reported.
     Stock-based Compensation
          The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method and provides pro forma disclosures of net income and net income per common share as if the fair value method had been applied in measuring compensation expense. Equity instruments are granted to employees, directors, and consultants in certain instances, as defined in the respective plan agreements.
          Had the Company accounted for these plans under the fair value method, net income and pro forma net income per share would have been reported as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended   For the Six Months Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2005   2004
Net income
  $ 2,565     $ 3,507     $ 5,151     $ 6,355  
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects
    19       220       19       329  
Deduct: Stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects
    (813 )     (2,015 )     (1,446 )     (3,453 )
 
                               
Pro forma net income
  $ 1,771     $ 1,712     $ 3,724     $ 3,231  
 
                               
Net income per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.13     $ 0.19     $ 0.26     $ 0.34  
 
                               
Diluted
  $ 0.11     $ 0.16     $ 0.23     $ 0.29  
 
                               
Pro forma basic
  $ 0.09     $ 0.09     $ 0.19     $ 0.17  
 
                               
Pro forma diluted
  $ 0.08     $ 0.08     $ 0.17     $ 0.16  
 
                               
          During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, the Company incurred $31 thousand of stock-based compensation associated with the issuance of restricted stock. See note 10. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, the Company incurred $356 thousand and $533 thousand of stock-based compensation expense, respectively. The stock-based compensation expense was associated with shares issued and to be issued pursuant to the Company’s 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). The Company incurred stock-based compensation expense because the original number of ESPP shares approved by the shareholders were insufficient to meet employee demand for an ESPP offering which was consummated in February 2003 and ended in August 2004. The Company subsequently received shareholder approval for additional ESPP shares in May 2003. The shares issued and to be issued in the February 2003 ESPP offering in excess of the original number of ESPP shares approved at the beginning of the offering (the “shortfall”) triggers recognition of stock-based compensation expense under the intrinsic value method. The shortfall amounted to 138 thousand and 149 thousand shares in May 2004 and August 2004, respectively.
          The expense per share is calculated as the difference between 85% of the closing price of RadiSys shares as quoted on NASDAQ on the date that additional ESPP shares were approved (May 2003) and the February 2003 ESPP offering purchase price. Accordingly, the expense per share is calculated as the difference between $8.42 and $5.48. The shortfall of shares is dependent on the amount of contributions from participants enrolled in the February 2003 ESPP offering.
          The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended   For the Six Months Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2005   2004
Cost of sales
  $ 4     $ 34     $ 4     $ 81  
Research and development
    13       177       13       251  
Selling, general and administrative
    14       145       14       201  
 
                               
 
  $ 31     $ 356     $ 31     $ 533  
 
                               

9


Table of Contents

     Recent Accounting Pronouncements
          FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004” (“FSP 109-2”), provides guidance under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” with respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”) on income tax expense and deferred tax liabilities. The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. RadiSys expects to make its repatriation determination by the end of fiscal 2005. Accordingly, as provided for in FSP 109-2, RadiSys has not adjusted its tax expense or deferred tax liability to reflect the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act.
          In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The effective date for the Company is the beginning of the first fiscal quarter of 2006. Effective November 12, 2004, RadiSys accelerated the vesting of all outstanding stock options with an option price greater than $15.99 in anticipation of implementation of Statement No. 123R. Such acceleration of vesting was done for the purpose of avoiding future expense associated with any unvested stock options granted prior to the effective date of Statement No. 123R. If we were to continue to use the fair value method currently used for reporting pro forma disclosures of net income (loss) and net income (loss) per common share, we estimate a reduction in stock-based compensation expense associated with the acceleration of approximately $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
          In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) regarding the SEC’s interpretation of SFAS 123R and the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. RadiSys is evaluating the requirements of SFAS 123R and SAB 107 and expects that the adoption of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 will have a material impact on RadiSys’ consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. RadiSys has not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS 123R, and it has not determined whether the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123.
          The following recent accounting pronouncements either did not have a material impact on RadiSys’ results of operations and financial condition upon adoption or in the case of pronouncements not yet effective it is anticipated that adoption will not have a material impact on RadiSys’ results of operations and financial condition:
    SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets—An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions.”
 
    FSP No. 106-2 (“FSP 106-2”), “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” (the “Medicare Act”)
 
    FSP No. 46(R)-5, “Implicit Variable Interests under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”
 
    FASB Interpretation No. 47 . “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143”
          In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs—An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS 151”). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and re-handling costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal” as stated in ARB No. 43. Additionally, SFAS 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by RadiSys in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. RadiSys is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS 151 will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact.
Note 2 — Investments
          Short-term and long-term investments consisted of the following (in thousands):

10


Table of Contents

                 
    June 30,   December 31,
    2005   2004
Short-term held-to-maturity investments, including unamortized discount of $56 and premium of $103, respectively
  $ 26,544     $ 17,303  
 
               
Short-term available-for-sale investments
  $ 90,550     $ 61,000  
 
               
Long-term held-to-maturity investments*
  $ 25,500     $ 39,750  
 
               
 
*   Long term investments were purchased at par value and therefore there is no discount or premium associated with these investments.
          The Company invests excess cash in debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies, those of high-quality corporate issuers and municipalities. The company’s investments in the debt instruments of municipalities primarily consist of investments in auction rate securities. Auction rate securities have been classified as available-for-sale short-term investments. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses are recorded, net of tax, as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 the Company did not recognize any gains or losses on the sales of available-for-sale investments as the fair value of these investments approximated there carrying value. The Company incurred no unrealized gains or losses on investments classified as available-for-sale as of June 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004. As of June 30, 2005, the Company’s long-term held-to-maturity investments had maturities ranging from 13 months to 14 months. The Company’s investment policy requires that the total investment portfolio, including cash and investments, not exceed a maximum weighted-average maturity of 18 months. In addition, the policy mandates that an individual investment must have a maturity of less than 36 months, with no more than 20% of the total portfolio exceeding 24 months. As of June 30, 2005, the Company was in compliance with its investment policy.
Note 3 — Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables
          Accounts receivable consists of trade accounts receivable. Accounts receivable balances consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,   December 31,
    2005   2004
Accounts receivable, gross
  $ 44,247     $ 43,790  
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts
    (881 )     (888 )
 
               
Accounts receivable, net
  $ 43,366     $ 42,902  
 
               
          The Company recorded no provisions for allowance for doubtful accounts during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
          As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the balance in other receivables was $4,991 thousand and $2,808 thousand, respectively. Other receivables consists of non-trade receivables. There is no revenue recorded associated with non-trade receivables. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 other receivables primarily consisted of receivables for the sale of inventory to the Company’s contract manufacturing partners. Sales to the Company’s contract manufacturing partners are based on terms and conditions similar to the terms offered to the Company’s regular customers.

11


Table of Contents

Note 4 — Inventories
          Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,   December 31,
    2005   2004
Raw materials
  $ 19,992     $ 24,044  
Work-in-process
    1,925       1,505  
Finished goods
    4,641       3,958  
 
               
 
    26,558       29,507  
Less: inventory reserves
    (6,409 )     (7,353 )
 
               
Inventories, net
  $ 20,149     $ 22,154  
 
               
          During the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded provision for excess and obsolete inventory of $832 thousand and $785 thousand, respectively. During both the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded provision for excess and obsolete inventory of $ 1.5 million.
          The following is a summary of the change in the Company’s excess and obsolete inventory reserve for the six months ended June 30 , 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):
                 
    For the Six Months Ended
    June 30,
    2005   2004
Inventory reserve balance, beginning of the quarter
  $ 7,353     $ 9,491  
Usage:
               
Inventory scrapped
    (1,667 )     (1,183 )
Inventory consumed through sales
    (752 )     (1,952 )
 
               
Subtotal — usage
    (2,419 )     (3,135 )
Reserve provision
    1,475       1,501  
 
               
Remaining reserve balance, end of the quarter
  $ 6,409     $ 7,857  
 
               
Note 5 — Goodwill
          The Company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually. Additionally, the Company assesses goodwill for impairment if any adverse conditions exist that would indicate an impairment. Conditions that would trigger an impairment assessment, include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset or an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. The Company is considered one reporting unit. As a result, to determine whether or not goodwill may be impaired, the Company compares its book value to its market capitalization. If the trading price or the average trading price of the Company’s common stock is below the book value per share for a sustained period, a goodwill impairment test will be performed by comparing book value to estimated market value. The Company’s book value per share was $10.00 at June 30, 2005 which was lower then the trading value of the Company’s common stock during the six month period ended June 30, 2005. Additionally, the Company performs other tests, such as the multiple of revenues and present value of future cash flows to further validate the fair market value of its goodwill. The Company completed its most recent annual goodwill impairment analysis as of September 30, 2004 and concluded that as of September 30, 2004, there was no goodwill impairment.
Note 6 — Intangible Assets
          The following tables summarize details of the Company’s total purchased intangible assets (in thousands):
                         
            Accumulated    
    Gross   Amortization   Net
June 30, 2005
                       
Existing technology
  $ 2,415     $ (1,610 )   $ 805  
Technology licenses
    6,790       (5,847 )     943  
Patents
    6,647       (5,674 )     973  
Trade names
    736       (272 )     464  
Other
    237       (237 )      
 
                       
Total
  $ 16,825     $ (13,640 )   $ 3,185  
 
                       

12


Table of Contents

                         
            Accumulated    
    Gross   Amortization   Net
December 31, 2004
                       
Existing technology
  $ 2,415     $ (1,457 )   $ 958  
Technology licenses
    6,790       (5,093 )     1,697  
Patents
    6,647       (5,590 )     1,057  
Trade names
    736       (237 )     499  
Other
    237       (237 )      
 
                       
Total
  $ 16,825     $ (12,614 )   $ 4,211  
 
                       
          The Company’s purchased intangible assets have remaining lives ranging from 4 to 11 years. The Company performs reviews for impairment of all its purchased intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. As of June 30, 2005, management concluded there was no indication of events or changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amount of purchased intangible assets may not be recoverable. The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets as of June 30, 2005 is as follows (in thousands):
         
    Estimated
    Intangible
    Amortization
For the years ending December 31,   Amount
2005(remaining six months)
  $ 1,026  
2006
    726  
2007
    526  
2008
    250  
2009
    210  
Thereafter
    447  
 
       
Total
  $ 3,185  
 
       
Note 7— Accrued Restructuring and Other Charges
          Accrued restructuring and other charges consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,   December 31,
    2005   2004
Second quarter 2005 restructuring charge
  $ 1,083     $  
Fourth quarter 2004 restructuring charge
    54       1,282  
Third quarter 2004 restructuring charge
          86  
Fourth quarter 2001 restructuring charge
    144       201  
 
               
Total
  $ 1,281     $ 1,569  
 
               
          The Company evaluates the adequacy of the accrued restructuring and other charges on a quarterly basis. As a result, the Company records certain reclassifications and reversals to the accrued restructuring and other charges based on the results of the evaluation. The total accrued restructuring and other charges for each restructuring event are not affected by reclassifications. Reversals are recorded in the period in which the Company determines that expected restructuring and other obligations are less than the amounts accrued.

13


Table of Contents

     Second Quarter 2005 Restructuring
     During the second quarter of 2005 the Company entered into a restructuring plan that included the elimination of 93 employees primarily within the Company’s manufacturing operations. These employee positions will be eliminated over the next four quarters in conjunction with continued outsourcing of production to the Company’s primary manufacturing partners, Celestica and Foxconn. The restructuring charge includes severance and other employee-related separation costs of approximately $1.1 million, which will be paid out over the next four quarters. Expenditures in the second quarter of 2005 are associated with severance payments made to employees whose employment terminated in the second quarter.
          The following table summarizes the changes to the second quarter 2005 restructuring costs (in thousands):
         
    Employee
    Termination and
    Related Costs
Restructuring and other costs
  $ 1,108  
Expenditures
    (25 )
 
       
Balance accrued as of June 30, 2005
  $ 1,083  
 
       
     Fourth Quarter 2004 Restructuring
          During the fourth quarter of 2004 the Company eliminated 58 positions. These reductions resulted from an increase in outsourced manufacturing as well as to continue the Company’s shift of skills required to develop, market, sell, and support more advanced embedded platforms and solutions. As of June 30, 2005 restructuring charges include severance and other employee-related separation costs as well as certain associated legal fees.
          The following table summarizes the changes to the fourth quarter 2004 restructuring costs (in thousands):
                         
    Employee        
    Termination and   Other    
    Related Costs   Charges   Total
Restructuring and other costs
  $ 1,630     $ 20     $ 1,650  
Expenditures
    (358 )     (10 )     (368 )
 
                       
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2004
    1,272       10       1,282  
 
                       
Additions
    16       13       29  
Expenditures
    (952 )     (23 )     (975 )
Reversals
    (33 )           (33 )
 
                       
Balance accrued as of March 31, 2005
  $ 303     $     $ 303  
 
                       
Expenditures
    (249 )           (249 )
 
                       
Balance accrued as of June 30, 2005
  $ 54     $     $ 54  
 
                       
          The restructuring accrual was decreased by $1.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005. The $33 thousand reversal recorded in the first quarter of 2005 was due to the retention of an employee who filled a new position within the Company. The remaining accrual balance primarily includes severance costs associated with one employee with a termination date in the third quarter of 2005.
     Third Quarter 2004 Restructuring
          In August 2004, the Company initiated plans to eliminate approximately 14 engineering and marketing positions in its Birmingham, UK office during the fourth quarter of 2004. The Company has integrated the work done by these employees into other RadiSys locations. In conjunction with the elimination of positions, some R&D spending has been re-directed to align with the Company’s strategy to deliver more integrated standards-based solutions. As of June 30, 2005 restructuring charges include severance and other employee-related separation costs for 11 employees as well as certain associated legal fees. Restructuring charges also include a $30 thousand loss on the disposal of certain property and equipment.

14


Table of Contents

          The following table summarizes the changes to the third quarter 2004 restructuring costs (in thousands):
                         
    Employee        
    Termination and   Other    
    Related Costs   Charges   Total
Restructuring and other costs
  $ 410     $ 18     $ 428  
Additions
    24       30       54  
Expenditures
    (254 )     (48 )     (302 )
Reversals
    (94 )           (94 )
 
                       
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2004
    86             86  
 
                       
Additions
          72       72  
Expenditures
          (17 )     (17 )
write-offs
          (30 )     (30 )
Reversals
    (86 )           (86 )
 
                       
Balance accrued as of March 31, 2005
  $     $ 25     $ 25  
 
                       
Additions
          38       38  
Expenditures
          (63 )     (63 )
 
                       
Balance accrued as of June 30, 2005
  $     $     $  
 
                       
          During the six months ended June 30, 2005, $86 thousand in severance and related costs was reversed as one of the effected employees was retained to fill a new position within the Company. Additions to the restructuring accrual were primarily due to relocation costs and the write-offs that resulted from losses incurred on the disposal of property and equipment. During the first quarter of 2005 the Redditch, U.K. office was vacated and property and equipment that was not transferred to other locations was either disposed or sold. The disposal or sale of this property and equipment resulted in a net loss of $30 thousand. Additions to the reserve during second quarter of 2005 include $12 thousand in relocation expenses and $26 thousand paid for repairs associated with the vacated Redditch office building.
     Fourth Quarter 2001 Restructuring
          The following table summarizes the changes to the fourth quarter 2001 restructuring costs (in thousands):
                                         
    Employee                    
    Termination and           Property and   Other    
    Related Costs   Facilities   Equipment   Charges   Total
Restructuring costs
  $ 914     $ 2,417     $ 463     $ 132     $ 3,926  
Expenditures
    (452 )                       (452 )
Write-offs
                (463 )           (463 )
 
                                       
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2001
    462       2,417             132       3,011  
Expenditures
    (395 )     (931 )           (27 )     (1,353 )
Reversals
    (67 )                       (67 )
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2002
          1,486             105       1,591  
Expenditures
          (576 )           (14 )     (590 )
Reversals
          (1 )           (1 )     (2 )
 
                                       
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2003
          909             90       999  
Expenditures
          (428 )           (90 )     (518 )
Expenditures — lease buy-out
          (53 )                 (53 )
Recoveries
          141                   141  
Reversals
          (368 )                 (368 )
 
                                       
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2004
          201                     201  
 
                                       
Expenditures
          (33 )                 (33 )
 
                                       
Balance accrued as of March 31, 2005
  $     $ 168     $     $       $ 168  
 
                                       
Expenditures
          (24 )                 (24 )
 
                                       
Balance accrued as of June 30, 2005
  $     $ 144     $     $       $ 144  
 
                                       
          The accrual amount remaining as of June 30, 2005 represents mainly lease obligations relating to the facilities in Boca Raton, Florida expected to be paid monthly for the next 7 months.
Note 8 — Short-Term Borrowings

15


Table of Contents

     During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company renewed its line of credit facility, which expires on March 31, 2006, for $20.0 million at an interest rate based upon the lower of the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.0% or the bank’s prime rate. The line of credit is collateralized by the Company’s non-equity investments and is reduced by any standby letters of credit. At March 31, 2005, the Company had a standby letter of credit outstanding related to one of its medical insurance carriers for $105 thousand. The market value of non-equity investments must exceed 125.0% of the borrowed facility amount, and the investments must meet specified investment grade ratings.
     As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding balances on the line of credit or any draws under the standby letter of credit and the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.
Note 9 — Long-Term Liabilities
Convertible Senior Notes
     During November 2003, the Company completed a private offering of $100 million aggregate principal amount of 1.375% convertible senior notes due November 15, 2023 to qualified institutional buyers. The discount on the convertible senior notes amounted to $3 million.
     Convertible senior notes are unsecured obligations convertible into the Company’s Common Stock and rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future obligations that are unsecured and unsubordinated. Interest on the senior notes accrues at 1.375% per year and is payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. The convertible senior notes are payable in full in November 2023. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity under certain circumstances, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $23.57 per share, which is equal to a conversion rate of 42.4247 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. The notes are convertible prior to maturity into shares of the Company’s Common Stock under certain circumstances that include but are not limited to (i) conversion due to the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the trading day prior to the conversion date reaching 120% or more of the conversion price of the notes on such trading date and (ii) conversion due to the trading price of the notes falling below 98% of the conversion value. Upon conversion the Company will have the right to deliver, in lieu of Common Stock, cash or a combination of cash and Common Stock. The Company may redeem all or a portion of the notes at its option on or after November 15, 2006 but before November 15, 2008 provided that the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date of the notice of the provisional redemption. On or after November 15, 2008, the Company may redeem the notes at any time. On November 15, 2008, November 15, 2013, and November 15, 2018, holders of the convertible senior notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase, in cash, all or any part of the notes held by such holder at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being purchased, together with accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, up to but excluding the purchase date. The accretion of the discount on the notes is calculated using the effective interest method.
     As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the Company had outstanding convertible senior notes with a face value of $100 million. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the book value of the convertible senior notes was $97.2 million and $97.1 million, respectively, net of unamortized discount of $2.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Amortization of the discount on the convertible senior notes was $33 thousand and $36 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Amortization of the discount on the convertible senior notes was $66 thousand and $68 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The estimated fair value of the convertible senior notes was $97.8 million and $106.8 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Convertible Subordinated Notes
     Convertible subordinated notes are unsecured obligations convertible into the Company’s Common Stock and are subordinated to all present and future senior indebtedness of the Company. Interest on the subordinated notes accrues at 5.5% per year and is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15. The convertible subordinated notes are payable in full in August 2007. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or before maturity, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $67.80 per share, which is equal to a conversion rate of 14.7484 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. If the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock equals or exceeds 140% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date on which a notice of redemption is mailed, then the Company may redeem all or a portion of the notes at its option at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the notes plus a premium (which declines annually on August 15 of each year), together with accrued and

16


Table of Contents

unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. The accretion of the discount on the notes is calculated using the effective interest method.
     In the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company repurchased $125 thousand principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes at face value for a loss of $1 thousand.
     In the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company repurchased $1.0 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $12 thousand. The Company repurchased the notes in the open market for $990 thousand and, as a result, recorded a loss of $3 thousand.
     For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company repurchased $58.8 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $897 thousand. The Company repurchased the notes in the open market for $58.2 million and, as a result, recorded a loss of $387 thousand.
     On April 26, 2005 the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of the remaining $8.9 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes. The Company will consider the purchase of the notes on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject to market conditions.
     As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the Company had outstanding convertible subordinated notes with a face value of $8.9 million and $10.0 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the book value of the convertible subordinated notes was $8.8 million and $9.9 million, respectively, net of amortized discount of $92 thousand and $126 thousand, respectively. Amortization of the discount on the convertible subordinated notes was $10 thousand and $46 thousand for the three ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively and $21 thousand and $118 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The estimated fair value of the convertible subordinated notes was $8.9 million and $10.0 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
     The aggregate maturities of long-term liabilities for each of the years in the five year period ending December 31, 2009 and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Convertible   Convertible
    Senior   Subordinated
For the Years Ending December 31,   Notes   Notes
2005 (remaining six months)
  $     $  
2006
           
2007
          8,868  
2008(1)
    100,000        
2009
           
Thereafter
           
 
               
 
    100,000       8,868  
Less: unamortized discount
    (2,787 )     (92 )
Less: current portion
           
 
               
Long-term liabilities
  $ 97,213     $ 8,776  
 
               
 
(1)   On or after November 15, 2008, the Company may redeem the Convertible Senior Notes at any time. On November 15, 2008, November 15, 2013, and November 15, 2018, holders of the convertible senior notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase, in cash, all or any part of the notes held by such holder at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being purchased, together with accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, up to but excluding the purchase date.
Note 10 —Restricted Stock
     On March 1, 2005, the Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors approved the form of the restricted stock agreement to be used in connection with restricted stock awards to be granted to employees of the Company under the terms of the Company’s 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. The agreement provides, among other things, that 33% of the shares will vest each year following the date of the grant. During the second quarter employees that have historically been awarded compensation in the form of stock options were allowed to elect to receive restricted stock that approximated the value of stock options that otherwise would have been awarded. Any employee selecting restricted stock received 1 share of restricted stock for every 3 stock options they would have

17


Table of Contents

otherwise received. Effective May 2, 2005 the Compensation and Development Committee approved the grant of restricted stock awards to certain employees totaling 40,502 shares. The Company recorded $31 thousand of stock-based compensation related to the issuance of restricted stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. The Company did not incur any stock-based compensation expense associated with restricted stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Note 11 —Basic and Diluted Income Per Share
     A reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator used to calculate basic and diluted income per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2005   2004
Numerator — Basic
                               
Net income, basic
  $ 2,565     $ 3,507     $ 5,151     $ 6,355  
 
                               
Numerator — Diluted
                               
Net income, basic
    2,565       3,507       5,151       6,355  
Interest on convertible notes, net of tax benefit(1)
    242       232       485       479  
 
                               
Net income, diluted
  $ 2,807     $ 3,739     $ 5,636     $ 6,834  
 
                               
Denominator — Basic
                               
Weighted average shares used to calculate income per share , basic
    19,981       18,826       19,882       18,659  
 
                               
Denominator — Diluted
                               
Weighted average shares used to calculate income per share , basic
    19,981       18,826       19,882       18,659  
Effect of convertible notes(1)
    4,243       4,243       4,243       4,243  
Effect of dilutive stock options(2)
    394       764       422       863  
Effect of dilutive unvested restricted stock
    2             1        
 
                               
Weighted average shares used to calculate income per share , diluted
    24,620       23,833       24,548       23,765  
 
                               
Net income per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.13     $ 0.19     $ 0.26     $ 0.34  
 
                               
Diluted(1)
  $ 0.11     $ 0.16     $ 0.23     $ 0.29  
 
                               
 
(1)   Interest on convertible subordinated notes and related as-if converted shares were excluded from the calculation as the effect would be anti-dilutive. For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the total number of as-if converted shares excluded from the calculation associated with the convertible subordinated notes was 132 thousand and 635 thousand. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the total number of as-if converted shares excluded from the calculation associated with the convertible subordinated notes was 138 thousand and 825 thousand.
 
(2)   For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, options amounting to 2.4 million and 1.9 million were excluded from the calculation as the exercise prices were higher than the average market price of the common shares; therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, options amounting to 2.3 million and 976 thousand were excluded from the calculation as the exercise prices were higher than the average market price of the common shares; therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Note 12 — Income Taxes
     The Company’s effective tax rate for the three month ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 differs from the statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits related to certain foreign sales, the amortization of goodwill for tax purposes, and tax benefits associated with research and development credits. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 differed from the statutory rate due to tax benefits related to certain foreign sales and other permanent differences.
     On October 22, 2004, the President of the United States signed the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Act”). One of the key provisions of the Act includes a repeal of the extraterritorial income exclusion with certain transitional rules. In its place, the Act provides a relief provision for domestic manufacturers by providing a new domestic manufacturing deduction. The Act also includes a temporary incentive for U.S. multinationals to repatriate foreign earnings and other international tax reforms designed to improve the global competitiveness of U.S. multinationals. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the Act on its effective tax rate, cash flows and financial statements and expects to complete the evaluation by the end of 2005.

18


Table of Contents

Note 13 — Segment Information
     The Company has adopted SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” SFAS No. 131 establishes standards for the reporting by public business enterprises of information about operating segments, products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method for determining what information to report is based upon the way that management organizes the segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing financial performance.
     The Company is one operating segment according to the provisions of SFAS No. 131.
     Revenues on a product and services basis are as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2005   2004
Hardware
  $ 64,079     $ 57,496     $ 119,650     $ 115,743  
Software royalties and licenses
    1,114       1,609       2,239       3,067  
Software maintenance
    409       279       804       620  
Engineering and other services
    354       868       780       1,934  
Other
          1             4  
 
                               
Total revenues
  $ 65,956     $ 60,253     $ 123,473     $ 121,368  
 
                               
     Generally, the Company’s customers are not the end-users of its products. The Company ultimately derives its revenues from three end markets as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2005   2004
Service Provider Systems
  $ 33,142     $ 24,479     $ 59,887     $ 51,839  
Commercial Systems
    15,412       18,973       33,728       37,904  
Enterprise Systems
    17,402       16,801       29,858       31,625  
 
                               
Total revenues
  $ 65,956     $ 60,253     $ 123,473     $ 121,368  
 
                               
Information about the Company’s geographic revenues and long-lived assets by geographical area is as follows (in thousands):
Geographic Revenues
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2005   2004
United States
  $ 21,469     $ 24,750     $ 42,594     $ 47,604  
Other North America
    3,922       3,010       7,257       7,248  
 
                               
North America
    25,391       27,760       49,851       54,852  
Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”)
    33,976       28,962       61,825       59,635  
Asia Pacific
    6,589       3,531       11,797       6,881  
 
                               
Total
  $ 65,956     $ 60,253     $ 123,473     $ 121,368  
 
                               

19


Table of Contents

Long-lived assets by Geographic Area
                 
    June 30,   December 31,
    2005   2004
Property and equipment, net
               
United States
  $ 11,855     $ 12,031  
EMEA
    148       351  
Asia Pacific
    2,110       1,620  
 
               
Total
  $ 14,113     $ 14,002  
 
               
Goodwill
               
United States
  $ 27,521     $ 27,521  
 
               
Intangible assets, net
               
United States
  $ 3,185     $ 4,211  
 
               
     Two customers accounted for more than 10% of total revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. These customers accounted for the following percentages of total revenue:
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended   For the Six Months Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2005   2004
Nokia
    35.5 %     25.0 %     32.2 %     25.9 %
Nortel
    18.5 %     15.6 %     16.3 %     17.2 %
     As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the following customers accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable. These customers accounted for the following percentages of accounts receivable:
                 
    June 30,   December 31,
    2005   2004
Nokia
    39.9 %     32.3 %
Nortel
    17.5 %     *  
Diebold
    *       12.9 %
 
*   Accounted for less than 10% of accounts receivable.
Note 14 —Legal Proceedings
     In the normal course of business, the Company periodically becomes involved in litigation. As of June 30, 2005, management believes that the Company has no pending litigation that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

20


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction and Overview
     RadiSys is a leading provider of advanced embedded solutions for the service provider, commercial and enterprise systems markets. Through intimate customer collaboration, and combining innovative technologies and industry leading architecture, we help original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) bring better products to market faster and more economically. Our products include embedded boards, software, platforms and systems, which are used in today’s complex computing, processing and network intensive applications.
Our Strategy
     Our strategy is to provide customers with advanced embedded solutions in our target markets. We believe this strategy enables our customers to focus their limited resources and development efforts on their key areas of competency allowing them to provide higher value systems with a time-to-market advantage and a lower total cost of ownership. Historically, system makers had been largely vertically integrated, developing most, if not all, of the functional building blocks of their systems. System makers are now more focused on their core expertise and are looking for partners like RadiSys to provide them with merchant-supplied building blocks for a growing number of processing and networking functions.
Our Markets
     We provide advanced embedded solutions to three distinct markets:
  Service Provider Systems — The service provider systems market includes voice, video and data systems deployed into public networks. The service provider systems market consists of a variety of telecommunications focused applications, including 2, 2.5 and 3G wireless infrastructure products, wireline infrastructure products, packet-based switches and unified messaging products.
 
  Commercial Systems — The commercial systems market includes the following sub-markets: medical, transaction terminals, industrial automation equipment and test and measurement equipment. Examples of products into which our commercial systems embedded solutions are incorporated include ultrasound equipment, immunodiagnostics and hematology systems, CAT Scan (“CT”) imaging equipment, ATM’s, point of sale terminals, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, electronics assembly equipment and high-end test equipment.
 
  Enterprise Systems — The enterprise systems market includes embedded compute, processing and networking systems used in private enterprise IT infrastructure. The enterprise systems market consists of a variety of applications, including voice messaging, storage, data centers, Private Branch Exchange (“PBX”) systems, network access and security and switching applications.
     Starting in the third quarter of 2005 we will be changing our revenue reporting by market. We are seeing growing commonality and a convergence of technology and products within our current Service Provider and Enterprise markets. Based on this, we will be combining these two markets and report the underlying revenue associated with these markets as Communications Networking starting in the third quarter of 2005. We will also begin reporting a new sub-segment of the Communications Networking market for IP network and messaging revenues. Our Commercial market reporting will remain unchanged.
Our Market Drivers
     We believe there are a number of fundamental drivers for growth in the embedded solutions market, including:
    Increasing focus by OEMs to utilize outsourced modular building blocks to develop new systems. We believe OEMs are combining their internal development efforts with merchant-supplied platforms from partners like RadiSys to deliver more systems to market, faster at lower total cost of ownership.
 
    Increasing levels of programmable, intelligent and networked functionality embedded in a variety of systems, including systems for monitoring and control, real-time information processing and high-bandwidth network connectivity.

21


Table of Contents

    Increasing demand for standards-based solutions, such as Advanced Telecommunications Architecture (“ATCA”), and Computer-on-Modules (“COM”) Express that motivates system makers to take advantage of proven and validated standards-based products.
 
    Increasing demand for new technologies that utilize network processors, such as security and high-volume networking applications.
     In the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations, we intend to provide information that will assist in understanding our financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to same periods in 2004 and for the period ended June 30, 2005 compared to December 31, 2004, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this filing, and in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
     Certain statements made in this section of the report may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Please see the information contained in the section entitled “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” and the “RISK FACTORS.”
Overview
     Total revenue was $66.0 million and $60.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Total revenue was $123.5 million and $121.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, backlog was approximately $25.3 million and $30.9 million, respectively. We include all purchase orders scheduled for delivery within 12 months in backlog. The general trend within our addressable markets is for shorter lead times and supplier managed inventory, which will generally decrease backlog as a percentage of revenue. The increase in revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 was primarily driven by strong demand within the wireless market as our product content continues to expand with 2.5 and 3G deployments. We currently believe that the end markets that we serve will strengthen in 2005 and will experience mid to high single digit growth rates in 2005 as compared to 2004. We expect to grow faster than our customers’ end markets in 2005 due to new product introductions and increasing content in our customers’ solutions.
     In 2004 we shifted more of our investments from predominantly one-off custom-designed products to standards-based, re-usable platforms and solutions. We believe standards-based platforms provide our customers a number of fundamental benefits. First, by using ready-made platform solutions rather than ground-start custom-designs, our customers can achieve significantly shorter intervals and faster time-to-market. Second, we believe our customers can achieve a lower total cost by using solutions that are leveraged across multiple applications rather than a single-use proprietary solution. By offering ready-made platforms, we believe we have the opportunity to address a wider range of new market opportunities with the potential for faster time to revenue than with ground-start, custom-designs. We believe this ability to reuse designs makes our business and investment model more scalable. Finally, we believe a more standard product focused model will allow us to provide more integrated higher value solutions to our customers than we have typically delivered under a custom-design model.
     In 2004 we announced our Promentum™ family of ATCA products and in June 2005 we recorded our first revenue associated with these products. The Promentum™ family of products includes universal carrier cards, switch and control modules, disk storage modules, compute modules, and a 14-slot shelf or chassis. The Promentum™ SYS-6000 integrates these individual products into a blade server platform system. We believe the Promentum™ SYS-6000 system will provide customers a highly reliable managed platform on which to build their new voice and data offerings. During the second quarter of 2005 the Company announced the Promentum™ ATCA-7010, a packet processing module that allows the highest bandwidth available in a single ATCA® slot. This product is the latest addition to the Company’s family of ATCA-compliant products featuring dual Intel® IXP28xx network processors and is designed to address 10 Gbps wirespeed packet processing in network applications that demand high bandwidth throughput such as security gateways, GGSN’s, Broadband-Remote Access Servers, edge routers and session controllers. We have significant experience in the design, delivery and deployment of carrier-grade, modular platforms. We believe the ATCA standard increases our opportunity to implement reusable platforms, enabling the deployment of more flexible solutions based on cost-effective commercial technologies. We believe our core ATCA solutions will be applicable across a wide range of customers and applications and are potentially applicable in all of our defined markets. These integrated hardware and software platforms make extensive use of common architectural and component designs, usingcarrier grade operating systems and middleware, and will reduce development time and costs, which enhances application portability.

22


Table of Contents

     In addition to our new ATCA offerings, we announced our new Procelerant™ series of modular computing solutions for customers in our commercial systems markets for medical, transaction terminals and test and measurement applications. During the second quarter of 2005 we closed our first Procelerant™ application and are seeing a strong demand for evaluation units. We believe these new modular products will represent a family of high density, flexible solutions that will enable commercial systems customers to achieve more rapid time to market with cost effective designs.
     Net income was $2.6 million and $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Net income per share was $0.13 and $0.11, basic and diluted, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to net income per share of $0.19 and $0.16, basic and diluted, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Net income was $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to net income of $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Net income per share was $0.26 and $0.23, basic and diluted, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to net income per share of $0.34 and $0.29, basic and diluted, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2004. During the second quarter of 2005 the Company recorded a $1.1 million restructuring charge for severance and related expenses for 93 employees primarily within the Company’s manufacturing operations, where positions will be eliminated over the next four quarters in conjunction with continued outsourcing of production to the Company’s manufacturing partners. The restructuring is necessary to balance our production capacity with our level of outsourced manufacturing and the Company currently expects to incur additional restructuring charges over the next four quarters totaling approximately $200 thousand.
     Due to the restructuring charge taken in the second quarter of 2005, a lower average gross margin, and higher research and development spending on standards-based products, our profitability has decreased in the first and second quarters of 2005 compared to the same periods in 2004. The increase in expenses associated restructuring and research and development have been partially offset by lower interest expense associated with a lower outstanding debt balance in the first six months of 2005 as well as an increase in interest income due to higher yields and a higher balance of invested cash. Revenues in the first six months of 2005 were up compared to the same period in 2004 but due to a lower gross margins as a percentage, our profitability was not significantly impacted by the increase in revenue. Our gross margin as a percentage of revenue declined primarily due to product mix as well as changes in our excess and obsolete inventory provision and purchase commitment liabilities associated with our manufacturing transfers to our contract manufacturing partners. Product mix has impacted our gross margin as a percentage of revenue due to a higher percentage of revenue coming from higher volume products with competitive pricing. We also continue to incur some redundant manufacturing costs as we move forward with outsourcing our internal manufacturing to our partners Celestica and Foxconn.
     In November 2003, we completed a private offering of 1.375% convertible senior notes due November 15, 2023 to qualified institutional buyers, resulting in net proceeds of $97 million. We plan to use the proceeds of the offering for general corporate purposes including working capital, potential acquisitions, partnership opportunities, repayment of existing debt obligations, and the purchase of outstanding common stock. During 2004, we repurchased $58.8 million principal amount of the 5.5% convertible subordinated notes in the open market for $58.2 million. During the first quarter of 2005, we repurchased $1 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes in the open market for $990 thousand. On April 26, 2005 the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of the remaining $8.9 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes. On May 20, 2005 we repurchased an additional $125 thousand principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes. If and when we repurchase the remaining convertible subordinated notes, we anticipate incurring a small loss on the repurchase of the notes.
     In addition, on April 26, 2005 the Board of Directors also authorized the repurchase of up to $5 million of our outstanding shares of common stock. The Company currently intends to purchase the notes and stock on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject to market conditions.
     During the second quarter of 2005 we issued 40 thousand shares of restricted stock and incurred $31 thousand in stock-based compensation associated with this issuance. We anticipate incurring approximately $530 thousand in compensation expense over the next three years associated with the unvested shares included in this grant. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, we incurred $356 and $533 thousand of stock-based compensation expense associated with shares to be issued pursuant to the Company’s 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). We incurred stock-based compensation expense because the original number of ESPP shares approved by the shareholders was insufficient to meet employee demand for an ESPP offering which was consummated in February of 2003 and ended in August of 2004. The Company subsequently received shareholder approval for additional ESPP shares in May 2003.
     Cash and cash equivalents and investments amounted to $211.8 million and $198.6 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The increase in cash and cash equivalents and investments during the six months ended June 30, 2005, was

23


Table of Contents

primarily due to cash provided from operating activities. We generated net cash from operations in excess of net income in the six months ended June 30, 2005. Management believes that cash flows from operations, available cash and investment balances, and short-term borrowings will be sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs for the short-term and long-term.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
     The Company reaffirms its critical accounting policies and use of estimates as reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. As a result of our continued execution on our strategy of increasing the level of outsourced manufacturing the Company now considers our policies and estimates associated with our adverse purchase commitments reserve to be critical.
Adverse Purchase Commitments
     We are contractually obligated to reimburse our contract manufacturers for the cost or liability for excess inventory used in the manufacture of our products, for which there is no alternative use. As we continue to execute on our strategy of increasing the level of outsourced manufacturing the liability for adverse purchase commitments will become more significant. This will offset, however, by lower required reserves for escess and obsolete exposure on lower amount of Company-owned inventory. Estimates for adverse purchase commitments are derived from reports received from our contract manufacturers. Increases to this liability are charged to cost of goods sold. When and if the Company takes possession of inventory reserved for in this liability, the liability is transferred from other liabilities to our excess and obsolete inventory reserve. This liability, referred to as adverse purchase commitments, is provided for in other accrued liabilities. Adverse purchase commitments amounted to $599 thousand and $485 thousand at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Results of Operations
     The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended   For the Six Months Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2005   2004
Revenues
    100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %
Cost of sales
    70.6       66.8       69.3       68.0  
 
                               
Gross margin
    29.4       33.2       30.7       32.0  
Research and development
    11.1       11.8       12.0       11.1  
Selling, general, and administrative
    11.7       12.7       12.1       12.6  
Intangible assets amortization
    0.8       0.9       0.8       1.0  
Restructuring and other charges (reversals)
    1.7       (1.1 )     0.9       (0.7 )
 
                               
Income from operations
    4.1       8.9       4.9       8.0  
Loss on repurchase of convertible subordinated notes
          (0.6 )           (0.3 )
Interest expense
    (0.8 )     (1.7 )     (0.9 )     (2.0 )
Interest income
    2.1       1.2       2.1       1.3  
Other (expense) income, net
    (0.2 )           (0.4 )      
 
                               
Income before income tax provision
    5.2       7.8       5.7       7.0  
Income tax provision
    1.4       2.0       1.5       1.8  
 
                               
Net income
    3.8 %     5.8 %     4.2 %     5.2 %
 
                               
Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
     Revenues. Revenues increased by $5.7 million or 9.5%, from $60.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $66.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. Revenues increased by $2.1 million or 1.7%, from $121.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $123.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. Included in the revenues in the first quarter of 2004, was a $3.1 million end of life component inventory sale to one of our major customers. The inventory sale was recorded as revenue but did not generate any gross margin since the inventory was sold at cost.

24


Table of Contents

     The increase in revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, is due to an increase in revenues in the service provider systems market of $8.6 million and enterprise systems markets of $601 thousand, partially offset by a decrease in revenues in the commercial systems market of $3.5 million. The increase in revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, is due to an increase in revenues in the service provider systems of $8.0 million partially offset by a decrease in revenues in the enterprise and commercial systems markets of $1.8 million and $4.2 million, respectively. The $3.1 million end of life component inventory sale to one of our major customers was included the service provider systems market revenues in the first quarter of 2004. As of June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, backlog was approximately $25.3 million and $30.9 million, respectively.
     Revenues in the service provider systems market increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in 2004 due to strong demand within the wireless market as our product content continues to expand with 2.5 and 3G deployments.
     Revenues in the enterprise systems market increased in the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to strength in our IP PBX and messaging products resulting from the completion of customer specific product upgrades.
     Revenues in the commercial systems market decreased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to declines in our industrial automation and transaction terminal business, partially offset by increases within our test and measurement market. We believe that our transaction terminal revenue is now at an expected near-term run rate level and therefore expect our commercial systems revenue to be about the same as our second quarter of 2005.
     Given the dynamics of these markets, we may experience general fluctuations in the percentage of revenue attributable to each market and, as a result, the quarter to quarter comparisons of our markets often are not indicative of overall economic trends affecting the long-term performance of our markets. We currently expect that each of our markets will continue to represent a significant portion of total revenues.
     From a geographic perspective, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 the overall increase in revenues was split between customers located in the EMEA and Asia Pacific region. For the six month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 revenues in the EMEA region increased by $2.2 million while Asia Pacific revenues increased by $4.9 million. This increase to the Asia Pacific region is due to multinational customers receiving products directly into the Asia Pacific region. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 revenues from the Americas region declined by $2.4 million and $5.0 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2004. The decline in this region has been a result of declines in our industrial automation and transaction terminal business as well as a shift of sales to our multinational customers receiving directly into the Asia Pacific region. We currently expect continued quarterly fluctuations in the percentage of revenue from each geographic region.
     Gross Margin. Gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was 29.4% compared to 33.2% for the same period in 2004. Gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was 30.7% compared to 32.0% for the same period in 2004.
     Approximately half of the decrease in gross margin as a percentage of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in 2004 was attributable to product mix as more of our revenue is coming from higher volume products with competitive pricing. The remainder of the decrease is associated with our provision for excess and obsolete inventory and purchase commitment liabilities associated with our manufacturing transfers to our contract manufacturers partners. We also continue to incur some redundant manufacturing costs as we move forward with outsourcing our internal manufacturing to our partners Celestica and Foxconn.
     Based on current forecasted revenue mix, a leveling off of inventory exposures, and strategically competitive pricing to gain market share, we currently anticipate that gross margins will be in the high 20’s to 30% range for the next few quarters. This margin range excludes any impact from stock-based compensation expense that would result from the implementation of a new accounting standard that requires the recognition of stock-based compensation expense associated with employee stock options, which will be effective in 2006.
     Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salary, bonuses, and benefits for product development staff, and cost of design and development supplies and equipment, net of reimbursements for non-recurring engineering services. Research and development expenses increased $157 thousand, or 2.2%, from $7.1 million for the three months ended June

25


Table of Contents

30, 2004 to $7.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Research and development expenses increased $1.3 million, or 10.0%, from $13.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $14.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. During the second quarter of 2005 we continued to increase headcount at our Shanghai development center and have added other expenses in connection with the development of the infrastructure to support this location. The investment in this region combined with ongoing costs associated with the development of standards-based products, such as ATCA, have driven the increase in research and development expenses. Our long-term target for research and development expenses is around 10% of revenues, excluding any impact from stock-based compensation expense.
     Selling, General, and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses consist primarily of salary, commissions, bonuses and benefits for sales, marketing, executive, and administrative personnel, as well as the costs of professional services and costs of other general corporate activities. SG&A expenses remained relatively flat at $7.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. SG&A expenses decreased $399 thousand, or 2.6%, from $15.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease in SG&A expense in the six months ended June 30, 2005 is primarily associated with $614 thousand in non-reoccurring costs that were recognized in the first quarter of 2004 associated with a potential acquisition that was ultimately abandoned. Without these costs we would have seen a slight increase in SG&A expense primarily due to annual merit increases and increased sales and marketing expenses. The increase in sales and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2005 is largely attributable to increased commissions as a result of increased revenue. Our long-term goal for SG&A expenses is around 10% of revenues, excluding any impact from stock-based compensation expense.
     Stock-based Compensation Expense. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, the Company incurred $31 thousand of stock-based compensation associated with the issuance of restricted stock. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, we incurred $356 thousand and $533 thousand of stock-based compensation expense, respectively. The stock-based compensation expense was associated with shares to be issued pursuant to our 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). We incurred stock-based compensation expense because the original number of ESPP shares approved by the shareholders was insufficient to meet employee demand for an ESPP offering which was consummated in February 2003 and ended in August 2004. We subsequently received shareholder approval for additional ESPP shares in May 2003. The shares issued in the February 2003 ESPP offering in excess of the original number of ESPP shares approved at the beginning of the offering (the “shortfall”) triggered recognition of stock-based compensation expense under the intrinsic value method. The shortfall amounted to 138 thousand and 149 thousand shares in May 2004 and August 2004, respectively.
     We recognized stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended   For the Six Months Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2005   2004
Cost of sales
  $ 4     $ 34     $ 4     $ 81  
Research and development
    13       177       13       251  
Selling, general, and administrative
    14       145       14       201  
 
                               
 
  $ 31     $ 356     $ 31     $ 533  
 
                               
     Intangible Assets Amortization. Intangible assets consist of purchased technology, patents and other identifiable intangible assets. Intangible assets amortization expense was $513 thousand and $515 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Intangible assets amortization expense was $1.0 million and $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Intangible assets amortization decreased due to certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized during the first and second quarters of 2004. Goodwill and all other intangible assets have been and will periodically be evaluated for impairment. We perform reviews for impairment of goodwill and all purchased intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We completed our annual goodwill impairment analysis as of September 30, 2004 and concluded that as of September 30, 2004, there was no goodwill or intangible assets impairment. We are required under certain circumstances, to update our impairment analysis, which may result in losses on acquired goodwill and intangible assets.
     Restructuring and Other Charges (Reversals). We evaluate the adequacy of the accrued restructuring and other charges on a quarterly basis. As a result, we record certain reclassifications and reversals to the accrued restructuring and other charges based on the results of the evaluation. The total accrued restructuring and other charges for each restructuring event are not affected by reclassifications. Reversals are recorded in the period in which we determine that expected restructuring and other obligations are less than the amounts accrued. Tables summarizing the activity in the accrued liability for each restructuring event are contained in Note 7

26


Table of Contents

of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. During the first six months of 2005 and 2004, we recorded restructuring and other charges and reversals as described below.
Second Quarter 2005 Restructuring
     During the second quarter of 2005 the Company initiated a plan to eliminate 93 positions over the next four quarters. These reductions are the result of the increase in outsourced manufacturing. For the three month period ending June 30, 2005 the Company recognized $1.1 million in restructuring charges associated with this plan. The restructuring charge includes severance and other employee-related separation costs for 93 employees. We expect the workforce reduction to be substantially completed by June 30, 2006.
     Additions. In addition to the severance and other employee-related separation costs associated with the second quarter 2005 restructuring, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 we recorded additions amounting to $38 thousand and $139 thousand, respectively. The additions included relocation costs, fixed asset impairments and building repair costs associated with the third quarter 2004 restructuring.
     Reversals. We recorded reversals amounting to $119 thousand during three and six months ended June 30, 2005 primarily due to the retention of two employees who were transferred into new positions within the Company. We recorded reversals amounting to $678 thousand and $842 thousand during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, relating primarily to a buy-out of the remaining lease obligations on our Houston facility vacated as a result of the restructuring events and various amounts originally accrued for certain non-cancelable leases for facilities vacated as a result of the restructuring events. We entered into subleasing arrangements for a portion of these facilities and as a result we reduced the restructuring accruals.
     Loss on the Repurchase of Convertible Notes. In the first quarter of 2005, we repurchased $1.0 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $12 thousand. We repurchased the notes in the open market for $990 thousand and, as a result, recorded a loss of $3 thousand. In the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company repurchased $125 thousand principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes at face value for a loss of $1 thousand. In the three months ended June 30, 2004, we repurchased $58.8 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $897 thousand. We repurchased the notes in the open market for $58.2 million and, as a result, recorded a loss of $387 thousand. The repurchase of the remaining $8.8 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes has been approved by the board of directors and when and if we repurchase the remaining convertible subordinated notes, we anticipate incurring a loss on the repurchase of the notes.
     Interest Expense. Interest expense primarily includes interest expense incurred on convertible senior and subordinated notes. Interest expense decreased $522 thousand, or 49.8%, from $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $527 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Interest expense decreased $1.4 million, or 56.8%, from $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease in the interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 is due to the decrease in interest expense associated with the convertible subordinated notes as a result of the repurchase of $58.8 million principal amount of subordinated convertible notes during 2004.
     Interest Income. Interest income increased $627 thousand, or 81.2%, from $772 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Interest income increased $942 thousand, or 57.9%, from $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Interest income increased as a result of a higher average balance of cash, cash equivalents and investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Increasing interest rates and a shift in our investment portfolio towards higher yielding auction rate securities has also contributed to the increase in interest income.
     Other (Expense) Income, net. Other (expense) income, net, primarily includes foreign currency exchange gains and losses. Other (expense) income, net, was ($113) thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to ($27) thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Other (expense) income, net, was ($462) thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $51 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
     Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a net loss of $127 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to a net gain of $29 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a net loss of $425 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to a net gain of $132 thousand for the six

27


Table of Contents

months ended June 30, 2004. Due to certain events in late 2004, we changed the functional currency of our Irish subsidiaries from the Euro to the U.S. Dollar effective January 1, 2005, as required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, our Irish subsidiaries incurred no exchange rate gains or losses on transactions denominated in U.S. dollar for the three or six months ended June 30, 2005. The amount of the foreign currency net gains associated with transactions denominated in U.S. dollars in our Irish subsidiaries amounted to $83 thousand and $140 thousand for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. The remainder of the change in the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations is primarily associated with the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to Euro and the Japanese Yen.
     Net of the change in net losses related to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the change in Other expense, net, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, is primarily attributable to losses associated with the cash surrender value of life insurance policies included in our executive deferred compensation plan.
     Income Tax Provision (Benefit). We recorded a tax provision of $933 thousand and a tax provision of $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. We recorded a tax provision of $1.9 million and a tax provision of $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease in the income tax provision for the first half of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 is due to generating less pre-tax income. The Company’s expected effective tax rate for the year ended 2005 is 26.8% compared to 20.0% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in the effective tax rate between the first six months of 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004 is primarily due to a decrease in estimated income generated in certain foreign jurisdictions, a decrease in tax benefit related to certain qualified export sales and a decrease in tax credits. The 2005 estimated effective tax rate is based on current tax law and the current expected income, and assumes that the Company continues to receive the tax benefits associated with certain income associated with foreign jurisdictions. The tax rate may be affected by potential acquisitions, restructuring events or divestitures, the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed, and the ability to realize deferred tax assets.
     On October 22, 2004, the President of the United States signed the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Act”). One of the key provisions of the Act includes a repeal of the extraterritorial income exclusion with certain transitional rules. In its place, the Act provides a relief provision for domestic manufacturers by providing a new domestic manufacturing deduction. The Act also includes a temporary incentive for U.S. multinationals to repatriate foreign earnings and other international tax reforms designed to improve the global competitiveness of U.S. multinationals. We are currently evaluating the impact of the Act on our effective tax rate, cash flows and financial statements. On October 4, 2004 the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 was enacted which extended several expired business related tax breaks, including the research and development tax credit. Under the new law the research and development tax credit was retroactively reinstated to June 30, 2004 and is available through December 31, 2005. For the year ended December 31, 2004 we recorded a research and development tax credit in the amount of $407 thousand, a portion of which would not have been recorded had the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 not been enacted. We expect to record a federal research and development credit of approximately $355 thousand for the year ended 2005.
     FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the Act (“FSP 109-2”), provides guidance under FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” with respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the Act on enterprises’ income tax expense and deferred tax liability. FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying FASB Statement No. 109. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the repatriation provisions and expects to complete the evaluation by the end of 2005.
     Given the preliminary stage of our evaluation, it is not possible at this time to determine what impact the repatriation provisions will have on our consolidated tax accruals or our effective tax rate. Accordingly, as provided for in FSP 109-2, the Company has not adjusted its tax expense or deferred tax liability to reflect the repatriation provisions of the Act as of June 30, 2005.
     The IRS has completed its examination of our federal income tax returns for the years 1996 through 2002. The final audit report resulted in no negative consequences and was issued during the first quarter of 2004. The final results of the examination are subject to review and approval by the Joint Committee of Taxation. Although the Company has not received final approval from the Joint Committee of Taxation, the statute of limitations on assessment and collection of income taxes for all tax years 2002 and prior expired on April 1, 2005.

28


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
     The following table summarizes selected financial information for each of the three months ended on the dates indicated:
                         
    June 30,   December 31,   June 30,
    2005   2004   2004
    (Dollar amounts in thousands)
Working capital
  $ 210,683     $ 186,634     $ 176,871  
Cash and cash equivalents and investments
  $ 211,778     $ 198,619     $ 181,358  
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 69,184     $ 80,566     $ 119,307  
Short-term investments
  $ 117,094     $ 78,303     $ 26,201  
Accounts receivable, net
  $ 43,366     $ 42,902     $ 37,845  
Inventories, net
  $ 20,149     $ 22,154     $ 21,796  
Long-term investments
  $ 25,500     $ 39,750     $ 35,850  
Accounts payable
  $ 36,172     $ 31,585     $ 26,265  
Convertible senior notes
  $ 97,213     $ 97,148     $ 97,083  
Convertible subordinated notes
  $ 8,776     $ 9,867     $ 9,845  
Days sales outstanding (1)
    60       54       57  
Days to pay (2)
    71       59       60  
Inventory turns (3)
    9.2       6.9       7.4  
Inventory turns – days (4)
    39       48       79  
Cash cycle time – days (5)
    29       43       47  
 
(1)   Based on ending net trade receivables divided by (quarterly revenue, annualized and divided by 365 days).
 
(2)   Based on ending accounts payable divided by (quarterly cost of sales, annualized and divided by 365 days).
 
(3)   Based on quarterly cost of sales, annualized divided by ending inventory.
 
(4)   Based on ending inventory divided by (quarterly cost of sales, annualized and divided by 365 days).
 
(5)   Days sales outstanding plus inventory turns — days, less days to pay.
 
    Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $11 million from $80.6 million at December 31, 2004 to $69.2 million at June 30, 2005. Activities impacting cash and cash equivalents are as follows:

29


Table of Contents

Cash Flows
                 
    For the Six Months Ended
    June 30,
    2005   2004
    (In thousands)
Cash provided by operating activities
  $ 14,212     $ 10,665  
Cash (used in ) provided by investing activities
    (27,661 )     10,337  
Cash (used in ) provided by financing activities
    2,977       (51,451 )
Effects of exchange rate changes
    (910 )     (169 )
 
               
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
  $ (11,382 )   $ (30,618 )
 
               
     We have generated cash from operating activities in amounts greater than net income in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, driven mainly by improved management of our working capital. We currently believe that cash flows from operations, available cash balances, and short-term borrowings will be sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs.
     During the six months ended June 30, 2005 we used net cash provided by operating activities for capital expenditures amounting to $3.1 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, capital expenditures included our continued investment in equipment to support the Company’s China based manufacturing partner as well as leasehold improvements, office equipment and software to support our continued growth and productivity.
     Net cash provided by operating activities was also used for severance payments amounting to approximately $1.2 million associated with our 2004 restructuring activities. As we continue to transition our production to our contract manufacturing partners we will continue to require cash in order make this transition. During the second quarter of 2005 the Company entered a restructuring plan that included the elimination of 93 employees. As these employee positions are eliminated over the next four quarters we will be required to make severance payments totaling approximately $1 million.
     During the six months ended June 30, 2005 we also used $1.1 million to repurchase our 5.5% convertible subordinated notes. The Board of Directors has approved the repurchase of the remaining $8.8 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes and $5.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock. We will consider the purchase of the notes and common stock on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject to market conditions. In addition to the potential repurchase of our outstanding common stock and convertible subordinated notes we intend to use our working capital to expand our product offerings through research and development and potential acquisitions.
     During the six months ended June 30, 2005 we received $4.1 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock through the Company’s stock compensation plans.
     Changes in foreign currency rates impacted beginning cash balances during the six months ended June 30, 2005, by $910 thousand. Due to the Company’s international operations where transactions are recorded in functional currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on existing cash balances during any given periods results in amounts on the consolidated statements of cash flows that may not reflect the changes in the corresponding accounts on the consolidated balance sheets.
     During the first six months of 2004, we used net cash provided by operating activities for capital expenditures amounting to $2.1 million. During the first six months of 2004, capital expenditures primarily related to computer hardware, software, and test equipment to be used to design our standard products. Additionally, during the first six months of 2004, we received $6.7 million in cash proceeds from the sale of our common stock associated with our stock compensation plans.
     As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 working capital was $210.7 million and $186.6 million, respectively. Working capital increased by $24.0 million due to our net positive cash flow from operating and financing activities generated during the first two quarters of 2005.
     Management believes that cash flows from operations, available cash balances, and short-term borrowings will be sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs for the short-term and long-term future.

30


Table of Contents

  Held-to-Maturity Investments
     Held-to-maturity investments consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,   December 31,
    2005   2004
Short-term held-to-maturity investments, including unamortized premium of $56 and $103, respectively
  $ 26,544     $ 17,303  
 
               
Short-term available-for-sale investments
  $ 90,550     $ 61,000  
 
               
Long-term held-to-maturity investments*
  $ 25,500     $ 39,750  
 
               
 
*   Long term investments were purchased at par value and therefore there is no discount or premium associated with these investments.
     We invest excess cash in debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies, those of high-quality corporate issuers and municipalities. The Company’s investments in the debt instruments of municipalities primarily consist of investments in auction rate securities. Auction rate securities generally have maturity dates far into the future but due to a resetting interest rate feature associated with these instruments they are readily tradable and rarely have differences between there par value and fair market value. As we do not intend to hold these investments until maturity they are classified as available-for-sale and any unrealized holding gains and losses are recorded, net of tax, as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2005, the Company’s long-term held-to-maturity investments had maturities ranging from 13 months to 14 months. The Company’s investment policy requires that the total investment portfolio, including cash and investments, not exceed a maximum weighted-average maturity of 18 months. In addition, the policy mandates that an individual investment must have a maturity of less than 36 months, with no more than 20% of the total portfolio exceeding 24 months. As of June 30, 2005, the Company was in compliance with its investment policy.

31


Table of Contents

  Line of Credit
     During the first quarter of 2005, we renewed our line of credit facility, which expires on March 31, 2006, for $20.0 million at an interest rate based upon the lower of the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.0% or the bank’s prime rate. The line of credit is collateralized by our non-equity investments and is reduced by any standby letters of credit. At June 30, 2005, we had a standby letter of credit outstanding related to one of our medical insurance carriers for $105 thousand. The par value of non-equity investments must exceed 125.0% of the borrowed facility amount, and the investments must meet specified investment grade ratings.
     As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding balances on the standby letter of credit or line of credit and we were in compliance with all debt covenants.
  Convertible Senior Notes
     During November 2003, we completed a private offering of $100 million aggregate principal amount of 1.375% convertible senior notes due November 15, 2023 to qualified institutional buyers. The discount on the convertible senior notes amounted to $3 million.
     Convertible senior notes are unsecured obligations convertible into our Common Stock and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future obligations that are unsecured and unsubordinated. Interest on the senior notes accrues at 1.375% per year and is payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. The convertible senior notes are payable in full in November 2023. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity under certain circumstances, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of our Common Stock at a conversion price of $23.57 per share, which is equal to a conversion rate of 42.4247 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. The notes are convertible prior to maturity into shares of our Common Stock under certain circumstances that include but are not limited to (i) conversion due to the closing price of our Common Stock on the trading day prior to the conversion date reaching 120% or more of the conversion price of the notes on such trading date and (ii) conversion due to the trading price of the notes falling below 98% of the conversion value. We may redeem all or a portion of the notes at our option on or after November 15, 2006 but before November 15, 2008 provided that the closing price of our Common Stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date of the notice of the provisional redemption. On or after November 15, 2008, we may redeem the notes at any time. On November 15, 2008, November 15, 2013, and November 15, 2018, holders of the convertible senior notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase, in cash, all or any part of the notes held by such holder at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being purchased, together with accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, up to but excluding the purchase date.
     As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the Company had outstanding convertible senior notes with a face value of $100 million. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the book value of the convertible senior notes was $97.2 million and $97.1 million respectively, net of unamortized discount of $2.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively. The estimated fair value of the convertible senior notes was $97.8 million and $106.8 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
  Convertible Subordinated Notes
     During August 2000, we completed a private offering of $120 million aggregate principal amount of 5.5% convertible subordinated notes due August 15, 2007 to qualified institutional buyers. The discount on the convertible subordinated notes amounted to $3.6 million.
     Convertible subordinated notes are unsecured obligations convertible into our Common Stock and are subordinated to all present and future senior indebtedness of RadiSys. Interest on the subordinated notes accrues at 5.5% per year and is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15. The convertible subordinated notes are payable in full in August 2007. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or before maturity, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of our Common Stock at a conversion price of $67.80 per share, which is equal to a conversion rate of 14.7484 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. If the closing price of our common stock equals or exceeds 140% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date on which a notice of redemption is mailed, then we may redeem all or a portion of the notes at our option at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the notes plus a premium (which declines annually on August 15 of each year), together with accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.

32


Table of Contents

     In the second quarter of 2005, the Company repurchased $125 thousand principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes at face value, with an associated discount of $1 thousand. The Company recognized a loss of $1 thousand associated with this buy back.
     In the first quarter of 2005, the Company repurchased $1.0 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $12 thousand. The Company repurchased the notes in the open market for $990 thousand and, as a result, recorded a loss of $3 thousand.
     In 2004, we repurchased $58.8 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $897 thousand. We repurchased the notes in the open market for $58.2 million and, as a result, recorded a loss of $387 thousand.
     In 2003, we repurchased $10.3 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $212 thousand. We repurchased the notes in the open market for $9.2 million and, as a result, recorded a gain of $825 thousand. In 2002, we repurchased $21.0 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $587 thousand for $17.5 million in cash as part of negotiated transactions with third parties. The early extinguishments of the notes resulted in a gain of $3.0 million. In 2000, we purchased $20.0 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes, with an associated discount of $581 thousand for $14.3 million as part of a negotiated transaction with a third party. The early extinguishment of the notes resulted in a gain of $5.1 million.
     As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 we had outstanding convertible subordinated notes with a face value of $8.9 million and $10.0 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the book value of the convertible subordinated notes was $8.8 million and $9.9 million, respectively, net of amortized discount of $92 thousand and $126 thousand, respectively. The estimated fair value of the convertible subordinated notes was $8.9 million and $10.0 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
     On April 26, 2005 the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of the remaining $8.9 million principal amount of the convertible subordinated notes. The Company will consider the purchase of the notes on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject to market conditions.
  Stock Repurchase Program
     On April 26, 2005 the Board of Directors also authorized the repurchase of up to $5 million of our outstanding shares of common stock. The Company will consider the purchase of common stock on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject to market conditions.
Contractual Obligations
     The following summarizes RadiSys’ contractual obligations at June 30, 2005 and the effect of such on its liquidity and cash flows in future periods (in thousands).
                                                 
    2005*   2006   2007   2008   2009   Thereafter
Future minimum lease payments
  $ 1,636     $ 2,217     $ 1,956     $ 1,940     $ 1,883     $ 3,452  
Purchase obligations(1)
    22,777                                
Interest on convertible notes
    931       1,863       1,863       1,375       1,375       19,250  
Convertible senior notes(2)
                      100,000              
Convertible subordinated notes(2)
                8,868                    
 
                                               
Total
  $ 25,344     $ 4,080     $ 12,687     $ 103,315     $ 3,258     $ 22,702  
 
                                               
 
*   Remaining six months
 
(1)   Purchase obligations include agreements or purchase orders to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions and the approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty.
 
(2)   The convertible senior notes and the convertible subordinated notes are shown at their face values, gross of unamortized discount amounting to $2.8 million and $92 thousand, respectively at June 30, 2005. On or after November 15, 2008, we may redeem the convertible senior notes at any time. On November 15, 2008, November 15, 2013, and November 15, 2018, holders of the

33


Table of Contents

    convertible senior notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase, in cash, all or any part of the notes held by such holder at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being purchased, together with accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, up to but excluding the purchase date. The convertible subordinated notes are payable in full in August 2007.
  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     We do not engage in any activity involving special purpose entities or off-balance sheet financing.
  Liquidity Outlook
     We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents and investments, net, amounting to $211.8 million at June 30, 2005 and cash generated from operations will satisfy our short and long-term expected working capital needs, capital expenditures, stock and debt repurchases, and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing business operations. Capital expenditures are expected to range from $1 million to $1.5 million per quarter.

34


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements. Our statements concerning our beliefs about the success of our shift in business strategy from perfect-fit solutions to standards-based solutions, expectations and goals for revenues, gross margin, research and development expenses, selling, general, and administrative expenses, the impact of our restructuring events on future revenues, the anticipated cost savings effects of our restructuring activities, and our projected liquidity are some of the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All statements that relate to future events or to our future performance are forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plans,” “seeks,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “seek to continue,” “intends,” or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results or our industries’ actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
     Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include discussions of our goals, including those discussions set forth in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. We cannot provide assurance that these goals will be achieved.
     Although forward-looking statements help provide complete information about us, investors should keep in mind that forward-looking statements are only predictions, at a point in time, and are inherently less reliable than historical information. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider the risks outlined above and those listed under “Risk Factors.” These risk factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement.
     We do not guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements and we do not assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on information as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update any of these statements based on information after the date of this report.

35


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS
Risk Factors Related to Our Business
Because of our dependence on certain customers, the loss of, or a substantial decline in sales to, a top customer could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
     During 2004, we derived 58.2% of our revenues from five customers. These five customers were Nokia, Nortel, IBM, Comverse and Diebold. During 2004, revenues attributable to Nokia and Nortel were 28.5% and 13.7%, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, we derived 64.7% of our revenue from five customers. These five customers were Nokia, Nortel, Comverse, Avaya and Philips. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, revenues attributable to Nokia and Nortel were 32.2% and 16.3%, respectively. We believe that sales to these customers will continue to be a substantial percentage of our revenues. A financial hardship experienced by, or a substantial decrease in sales to any one of our top customers could materially affect revenues and profitability.
We are shifting our business from predominately perfect fit solutions to more standards-based products, such as ATCA products, which requires substantial expenditures for research and development which could adversely affect our short-term earnings and, if the strategy is not accepted by our customers or properly executed by the Company, it could have a material adverse effect on our long-term revenues, profitability and financial condition.
     We are shifting our business from predominately perfect fit solutions to more standards-based solutions, such as ATCA products. There can be no assurance that this strategy will be successful. This strategy requires us to make substantial expenditures for research and development in new technologies that we reflect as a current expense in our financial statements. We believe that these investments in standards-based products and new technologies will allow us to provide a broader set of products and building blocks to take to market and allow us to grow on a long-term basis. Revenues from some of these investments, such as ATCA, are not expected to result in any significant opportunities for at least twelve to eighteen months. Accordingly, these expenditures could adversely affect our short-term earnings. In addition, there is no assurance that these new products and technologies will be accepted by our customers and, if accepted, how large the market will be for these products or what the timing will be for any meaningful revenues. If we are unable to successfully develop and sell standards-based products to our customers, our revenues, profitability and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our projections of future revenues and earnings are highly subjective and may not reflect future results that may result in volatility in the price of our common stock.
     Most of our major customers have contracts but these contracts do not commit them to purchase a minimum amount of our products. These contracts generally require our customers to provide us with forecasts of their anticipated purchases. However, our recent experience indicates that customers can change their purchasing patterns quickly in response to market demands and therefore these forecasts may not be relied upon to accurately forecast sales. From time to time we provide projections to our shareholders and the investment community of our future sales and earnings. Since we do not have long-term purchase commitments from our major customers and the customer order cycle is short, it is difficult for us to accurately predict the amount of our sales and related earnings in any given period. Our projections are based on management’s best estimate of sales using historical sales data, information from customers and other information deemed relevant. These projections are highly subjective since sales to our customers can fluctuate substantially based on the demands of their customers and the relevant markets. If our actual sales or earnings are less than the projected amounts, the price of our common stock may be adversely affected.
Not all new product development projects ramp into production, and if ramped into production the volumes derived from such projects may not be as significant as we had originally estimated, which could have a substantial negative impact on our anticipated revenues and profitability.
     If a product development project actually ramps into production, the average ramp into production begins about 12 months after the project launch, although some more complex projects can take up to 24 months or longer. After that, there is an additional time lag from the start of production ramp to peak revenue. Not all projects ramp into production and even if a project is ramped into production, the volumes derived from such projects may not be as significant as we had originally estimated. Projects are sometimes canceled or delayed, or can perform below original expectations, which can adversely impact anticipated revenues and profitability.
Our business depends on the service provider, commercial and enterprise systems markets in which demand can be cyclical, and any inability to sell products to these markets could have a material adverse effect on our revenues.

36


Table of Contents

     We derive our revenues from a number of diverse end markets, some of which are subject to significant cyclical changes in demand. In 2004, we derived 43.4%, 31.9% and 24.7% of our revenues from the service provider, the commercial and the enterprise systems markets, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, we derived 48.5%, 27.3% and 24.2% of our revenues from the service provider, the commercial and the enterprise systems markets, respectively. We believe that our revenues will continue to be derived primarily from these three markets. Service provider revenues include, but are not limited to, telecommunications sales to Comverse, Lucent, Nokia and Nortel. Commercial systems revenues include, but are not limited to, sales to Agilent Technologies, Beckman Coulter, Diebold, Philips Medical and Seimens AG. Enterprise systems revenues include, but are not limited to, sales to Avaya, IBM and Nortel. Generally, our customers are not the end-users of our products. If our customers experience adverse economic conditions in the markets into which they sell our products (end markets), we would expect a significant reduction in spending by our customers. Some of these end markets are characterized by intense competition, rapid technological change and economic uncertainty. Our exposure to economic cyclicality and any related fluctuation in customer demand in these end markets could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and financial condition. Significant reduction in our customers’ spending, such as what we experienced in 2001 and 2002, will result in decreased revenues and earnings. We continue to execute on our strategy of expanding into new end markets either through new product development projects with our existing customers or through new customer relationships, but no assurance can be given that this strategy will be successful.
Because of our dependence on a few suppliers, or in some cases one supplier, for some of the components we use, as well as our dependence on a few contract manufacturers to supply a majority of our products, a loss of a supplier, a decline in the quality of these components, a shortage of any of these components, or a loss of a contract manufacturer could have a material adverse effect on our business or our financial performance.
     We depend on a few suppliers, or in some cases one supplier, for a continuing supply of the components we use in the manufacture of our products and any disruption in supply or decline in quality of components supplied could adversely impact our financial performance. For example, we are dependent solely on Intel for the supply of some microprocessors and other components, and we depend on LSI, Epson Electronic America, Broadcom, NEC, Chen Ming, Triax and Texas Instruments as the sole source suppliers for other components such as integrated circuits and mechanical assemblies. Alternative sources of supply for some of these components would be difficult to locate and/or it would require a significant amount of time and resources to establish an alternative supply line. We also rely on contract manufacturers as the sole suppliers of certain RadiSys products. For example Foxconn produces certain products that we do not produce internally and that no other contact manufacturer produces for us. Alternative sources of supply for the RadiSys products that our contract manufacturers produce would be difficult to locate and/or it would require a significant amount of time and resources to establish an alternative supply line, including transitioning the products to be internally produced. In addition, any decline in the quality of components supplied by our vendors or products produced by our contract manufacturing partners could adversely impact our reputation.
We are shifting a significant portion of our manufacturing to third party contract manufacturers and our inability to properly transfer our manufacturing or any failed or less than optimal execution on their behalf could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
     We have traditionally manufactured a substantial portion of our products. To lower our costs and provide better value and more competitive products for our customers and to achieve higher levels of global fulfillment, we are shifting a significant amount of our manufacturing to third party contract manufacturers. As of June 30, 2005, our contract manufacturing partners were manufacturing approximately 74% of total unit volumes. We expect to increase our outsourcing to our contract manufacturers to 80% or more of our unit volume by the end of 2005. If we do not properly transfer our manufacturing expertise to these third party manufacturers or they fail to adequately perform, our revenues and profitability could be adversely affected. Among other things, inadequate performance from our contract manufacturers could include the production of products that do not meet our high quality standards or unanticipated scheduling delays in production and delivery. We also rely on contract manufacturers as the sole suppliers of certain RadiSys products. For example Foxconn produces certain products that we do not produce internally and that no other contact manufacturer produces for us. Alternative sources of supply for the RadiSys products that our contract manufacturers produce would be difficult to locate and/or it would require a significant amount of time and resources to establish an alternative supply line, including transitioning the products to be internally produced. We currently utilize several contract manufacturers for outsourced board and system production; however, we depend on two primary contract manufacturing partners, Foxconn, and Celestica, Inc.
Competition in the market for embedded systems is intense, and if we lose our position, our revenues and profitability could decline.

37


Table of Contents

     We compete with a number of companies providing embedded systems, including Advantech Co., Artesyn Technologies, Continuous Computing, Embedded Communications Computing Group , a unit of Motorola, Hewlett Packard, divisions within Intel Corporation and IBM, Kontron AG, Mercury Computer Systems and SBS Technologies. Because the embedded systems market is growing, it is attracting new non-traditional competitors. These non-traditional competitors include contract-manufacturers that provide design services and Asian-based original design manufacturers. Some of our competitors and potential competitors have a number of significant advantages over us, including:
    a longer operating history;
 
    greater name recognition and marketing power;
 
    preferred vendor status with our existing and potential customers; and
 
    significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, which allow them to respond more quickly to new or changing opportunities, technologies and customer requirements.
     Furthermore, existing or potential competitors may establish cooperative relationships with each other or with third parties or adopt aggressive pricing policies to gain market share.
     As a result of increased competition, we could encounter significant pricing pressures. These pricing pressures could result in significantly lower average selling prices for our products. We may not be able to offset the effects of any price reductions with an increase in the number of customers, cost reductions or otherwise. In addition, many of the industries we serve, such as the communications industry, are encountering market consolidation, or are likely to encounter consolidation in the near future, which could result in increased pricing pressure and additional competition.
Potential acquisitions and partnerships may be more costly or less profitable than anticipated and may adversely affect the price of our company stock.
     Future acquisitions and partnerships may involve the use of significant amounts of cash, potentially dilutive issuances of equity or equity-linked securities, issuance of debt and amortization of intangible assets with determinable lives. Moreover, to the extent that any proposed acquisition or strategic investment is not favorably received by shareholders, analysts and others in the investment community, the price of our common stock could be adversely affected. In addition, acquisitions or strategic investments involve numerous risks, including:
    difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies, products and personnel of the acquired company;
 
    the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;
 
    risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and
 
    the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company.
     In the event that an acquisition or a partnership does occur and we are unable to successfully integrate operations, technologies, products or personnel that we acquire, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our international operations expose us to additional political, economic and regulatory risks not faced by businesses that operate only in the United States.
     In 2004, we derived 5.0% of our revenues from Canada and Mexico, 50.1% of our revenues from EMEA and 6.1% from Asia Pacific. In addition, during 2004 we opened a design center in Shanghai, China and began to utilize a contract manufacturer in Shenzhen, China. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 approximately 31% of our total revenues were associated with products produced at our new China contract manufacturer. As a result, we are subject to worldwide economic and market condition risks generally associated with global trade, such as fluctuating exchange rates, tariff and trade policies, domestic and foreign tax policies, foreign governmental regulations, political unrest, wars and other acts of terrorism and changes in other economic conditions. These risks, among others, could adversely affect our results of operations or financial position. Additionally, some of our sales to overseas

38


Table of Contents

customers are made under export licenses that must be obtained from the United States Department of Commerce. Protectionist trade legislation in either the United States or other countries, such as a change in the current tariff structures, export compliance laws, trade restrictions resulting from war or terrorism, or other trade policies could adversely affect our ability to sell or to manufacture in international markets. Furthermore, revenues from outside the United States are subject to inherent risks, including the general economic and political conditions in each country. These risks, among others, could adversely affect our results of operations or financial position.
If we are unable to generate sufficient income in the future, we may not be able to fully utilize our net deferred tax assets or support our current levels of goodwill and intangible assets on our balance sheet.
     We cannot provide absolute assurance that we will generate sufficient taxable income in the future to fully utilize the net deferred tax assets of $27.0 million as of June 30, 2005. We may not generate sufficient taxable income due to earning lower than forecasted net income or incurring charges associated with unusual events, such as restructurings and acquisitions. Accordingly, we may record a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets if our expectations of future taxable income are not achieved. On the other hand, if we generate taxable income in excess of our expectations, the valuation allowance may be reduced accordingly. We also cannot provide absolute assurance that future income will support the carrying amount of goodwill and intangibles of $30.7 million on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2005, and therefore, we may incur an impairment charge in the future.
Our products for embedded computing applications are based on industry standards, which are continually evolving, and any failure to conform to these standards could have a substantial negative impact on our revenues and profitability.
     We develop and supply a mix of perfect fit and standards-based products. Standards-based products for embedded computing applications are often based on industry standards, which are continually evolving. Our future success in these products will depend, in part, upon our capacity to invest in, and successfully develop and introduce new products based on emerging industry standards. Our inability to invest in or conform to these standards could render parts of our product portfolio uncompetitive, unmarketable or obsolete. As our addressable markets develop new standards, we may be unable to successfully invest in, design and manufacture new products that address the needs of our customers or achieve substantial market acceptance.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we may lose a valuable competitive advantage or be forced to incur costly litigation to protect our rights.
     We are a technology dependent company, and our success depends on developing and protecting our intellectual property. We rely on patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to protect our intellectual property. At the same time, our products are complex, and are often not patentable in their entirety. We also license intellectual property from third parties and rely on those parties to maintain and protect their technology. We cannot be certain that our actions will protect proprietary rights. If we are unable to adequately protect our technology, or if we are unable to continue to obtain or maintain licenses for protected technology from third parties, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our period-to-period revenues, operating results and earnings per share fluctuate significantly, which may result in volatility in the price of our common stock.
     The price of our common stock may be subject to wide, rapid fluctuations. Our period-to-period revenues and operating results have varied in the past and may continue to vary in the future, and any such fluctuations may cause our stock price to fluctuate. Fluctuations in the stock price may also be due to other factors, such as changes in analysts’ estimates regarding earnings, or may be due to factors relating to the service provider, commercial and enterprise systems markets in general. Shareholders should be willing to incur the risk of such fluctuations.
Oregon corporate law, our articles of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that could prevent or discourage a third party from acquiring us even if the change of control would be beneficial to our shareholders.
     Our articles of incorporation and our bylaws contain anti-takeover provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control of our company, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our shareholders. These provisions:
    authorize our board of directors to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without prior shareholder approval to increase the number of outstanding shares and deter or prevent a takeover attempt;

39


Table of Contents

    establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by shareholders at shareholder meetings;
 
    prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow less than a majority of shareholders to elect director candidates; and
 
    limit the ability of shareholders to take action by written consent, thereby effectively requiring all common shareholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our common shareholders.
     In addition, if our common stock is acquired in specified transactions deemed to constitute “control share acquisitions”, provisions of Oregon law condition the voting rights that would otherwise be associated with those common shares upon approval by our shareholders (excluding, among other things, the acquirer in any such transaction). Provisions of Oregon law also restrict, subject to specified exceptions, the ability of a person owning 15% or more of our common stock to enter into any “business combination transaction” with us.
     The foregoing provisions of Oregon law and our articles of incorporation and bylaws could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.
In recent years, various state, federal and international laws and regulations governing the collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of certain materials used in the manufacturing of electrical and electronic components have been enacted. In support of these laws and regulations, we will incur significant additional expenditures and we may incur additional capital expenditures and asset impairments to ensure that our products and our vendor’s products are in compliance with these regulations, and we may also incur significant penalties in connection with any violations of these laws. Additionally, failure to comply with these regulations could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a result, our financial condition or operating results may be negatively impacted.
     The most significant pieces of legislation relate to two European Union (“EU”) directives aimed at wastes from electrical and electronic equipment (“WEEE”) and the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances (“RoHS”). Specifically, the RoHS directive prohibits the use of certain types of materials, such as lead, in the manufacturing of electronic products. As of July 1, 2006 products sold within the EU, a market in which we sell a significant amount of our products, must be RoHS compliant. Failure to comply with such legislation could result in our customers refusing to purchase our products and subject us to significant monetary penalties in connection with a violation, both of which could have a materially adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results from operations.
  Other Risk Factors Related to Our Business
     Other risk factors include, but are not limited to, changes in the mix of products sold, regulatory and tax legislation, changes in effective tax rates, inventory risks due to changes in market demand or our business strategies, potential litigation and claims arising in the normal course of business, credit risk of customers and other risk factors. Proposed changes to accounting rules, including proposals to account for employee stock options as a compensation expense, could materially increase the expense that we report under generally accepted accounting principles and adversely affect our operating results.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and equity trading prices, which could affect our financial position and results of operations.
     Interest Rate Risk. We invest excess cash in debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies, those of high-quality corporate issuers and municipalities. The Company’s investments in the debt instruments of municipalities primarily consist of investments in auction rate securities. We attempt to protect and preserve our invested funds by limiting default, market, and reinvestment risk. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair value adversely affected due to a rise in interest rates while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates decline. Due to the short duration of most of the investment portfolio, an immediate 10% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair value of our investment portfolio. Therefore, we would not expect our operating results or cash flows to be affected, to any significant degree, by the effect of a sudden change in market interest rates on the

40


Table of Contents

securities portfolio. The estimated fair value of our debt securities that we have invested in at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $176.0 million and $168.4 million, respectively. The effect of an immediate 10% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on our operating results or cash flows.
     Foreign Currency Risk. We pay the expenses of our international operations in local currencies, namely, the Japanese Yen, Canadian Dollar, British Pound, New Shekel, Chinese Yuan and Euro. The international operations are subject to risks typical of an international business, including, but not limited to: differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate volatility. Accordingly, future results could be materially and adversely affected by changes in these or other factors. We are also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the balance sheets and income statements of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars during the consolidation process. Because exchange rates vary, these results, when translated, may vary from expectations and adversely affect overall expected profitability. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a net loss of $127 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and a net gain of $29 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a net loss of $425 thousand in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and a net gain of $132 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
     Convertible Senior Notes. During November 2003, we completed a private offering of $100 million aggregate principal amount of 1.375% convertible senior notes due November 15, 2023 to qualified institutional buyers. The discount on the convertible senior notes amounted to $3 million.
     Convertible senior notes are unsecured obligations convertible into our Common Stock and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future obligations that are unsecured and unsubordinated. Interest on the senior notes accrues at 1.375% per year and is payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. The convertible senior notes are payable in full in November 2023. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of our Common Stock at a conversion price of $23.57 per share, which is equal to a conversion rate of 42.4247 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. The notes are convertible prior to maturity into shares of our Common Stock under certain circumstances that include but are not limited to (i) conversion due to the closing price of our Common Stock on the trading day prior to the conversion date reaching 120% or more of the conversion price of the notes on such trading date and (ii) conversion due to the trading price of the notes falling below 98% of the conversion value. We may redeem all or a portion of the notes at our option on or after November 15, 2006 but before November 15, 2008 provided that the closing price of our Common Stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date of the notice of the provisional redemption. On or after November 15, 2008, we may redeem the notes at any time. On November 15, 2008, November 15, 2013, and November 15, 2018, holders of the convertible senior notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase, in cash, all or any part of the notes held by such holder at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being purchased, together with accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, up to but excluding the purchase date.
     The fair value of the convertible senior notes is sensitive to interest rate changes. Interest rate changes would result in increases or decreases in the fair value of the convertible senior notes, due to differences between market interest rates and rates in effect at the inception of the obligation. Unless we elect to repurchase our convertible senior notes in the open market, changes in the fair value of convertible senior notes have no impact on our cash flows or consolidated financial statements. The estimated fair value of the convertible senior notes was $97.8 million and $106.8 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
     Convertible Subordinated Notes. Convertible subordinated notes are unsecured obligations convertible into our Common Stock and are subordinated to all present and future senior indebtedness of RadiSys. Interest on the subordinated notes accrues at 5.5% per year and is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15. The convertible subordinated notes are payable in full in August 2007. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or before maturity, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of our Common Stock at a conversion price of $67.80 per share, which is equal to a conversion rate of 14.7484 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. If the closing price of our common stock equals or exceeds 140% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date on which a notice of redemption is mailed, then we may redeem all or a portion of the notes at our option at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the notes plus a premium (which declines annually on August 15 of each year), together with accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.
     The fair value of the convertible subordinated notes is sensitive to interest rate changes. Interest rate changes would result in increases or decreases in the fair value of the convertible subordinated notes, due to differences between market interest rates and rates in effect at the inception of the obligation. Unless we elect to repurchase our convertible subordinated notes in the open market, changes in the fair value of convertible subordinated notes have no impact on our cash flows or consolidated financial statements. The

41


Table of Contents

estimated fair value of the convertible subordinated notes was $8.9 million and $10.0 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
     We have cumulatively repurchased convertible subordinated notes in the amount of $112 million, face value, for $100.6 million. These repurchases were financed from our investment portfolio. We received board authorization to repurchase all remaining convertible subordinated notes. We may elect to use a portion of our cash and cash equivalents and investment balances to buy back additional amounts of the convertible subordinated notes. As of June 30, 2005, our aggregate cash and cash equivalents and investments were $211.8 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
     Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
     In connection with the evaluation described above, we identified no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2005, and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

42


Table of Contents

PART II
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
     At the Company’s Annual Meeting on May 17, 2005, the holders of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock took the actions described below. As of the record date for the Annual Meeting, 18,418,405 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.
1.   The shareholders elected each of C. Scott Gibson, Scott C. Grout, Ken J. Bradley, Richard J. Faubert, Dr. William W. Lattin, Kevin C. Melia, Carl W. Neun, and Lorene K Steffes to the Company’s Board of Directors, by the votes indicated below, to serve for the ensuing year.
             
Nominees   Votes Cast    
C. Scott Gibson
    16,930,203     Shares in favor
 
    1,488,202     Shares against or withheld
 
        Abstentions
 
        Broker nonvotes
 
           
Scott C. Grout
    17,920,449     Shares in favor
 
    497,906     Shares against or withheld
 
        Abstentions
 
        Broker nonvotes
 
           
Ken J. Bradley
    17,550,897     Shares in favor
 
    867,508     Shares against or withheld
 
        Abstentions
 
        Broker nonvotes
 
           
Richard J. Faubert
    17,537,565     Shares in favor
 
    880,840     Shares against or withheld
 
        Abstentions
 
        Broker nonvotes
 
           
Dr. William W. Lattin
    17,860,557     Shares in favor
 
    557,848     Shares against or withheld
 
        Abstentions
 
        Broker nonvotes
 
           
Kevin C. Melia
    18,202,155     Shares in favor
 
    216,250     Shares against or withheld
 
        Abstentions
 
        Broker nonvotes
 
           
Carl W. Neun
    18,318,391     Shares in favor
 
    100,014     Shares against or withheld
 
        Abstentions
 
        Broker nonvotes
 
           
Lorene K. Steffes
    18,326,912     Shares in favor
 
    91,493     Shares against or withheld
 
        Abstentions
 
        Broker nonvotes

43


Table of Contents

2.   The proposal to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP was removed from the proposals to be voted. RadiSys filed an amendment to the proxy statement to remove this proposal as their audit committee made the business decision to change the Company’s independent auditors to KPMG LLP for 2005.
3.   Approval to amend the Company’s 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to add an additional 700,000 shares that may be issued under this plan.
     
13,171,807
  Shares in favor
2,664,196
  Shares against or withheld
42,220
  Abstentions
2,540,182
  Broker non-votes

44


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
     
Exhibit    
No   Description
10.1
  RadiSys Corporation 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.
 
   
31.1
  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.1
  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

45


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
    RADISYS CORPORATION
 
Dated: August 8, 2005
  By:   /s/ SCOTT C. GROUT
 
       
 
      Scott C. Grout
 
      President and Chief Executive Officer
 
       
Dated: August 8, 2005
  By:   /s/ JULIA A. HARPER
 
       
 
      Julia A. Harper
 
      Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer

46


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit No   Description
10.1
  RadiSys Corporation 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.
 
   
31.1
  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.1
  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

47