e10vqza
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q/A
(Amendment
No. 1)
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
January 31, 2007
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number:
001-32465
VERIFONE HOLDINGS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
04-3692546
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.
|
)
|
2099 Gateway Place, Suite 600
San Jose, CA 95110
(Address of principal executive
offices with zip code)
(408) 232-7800
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and
former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Large Accelerated
Filer þ
Accelerated
Filer o Non-Accelerated
Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). YES o NO þ
At March 7, 2007, the number of shares outstanding of the
registrants common stock, $0.01 par value was
82,654,752.
EXPLANATORY
NOTE
This Form 10-Q/A amends the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of VeriFone Holdings, Inc. (VeriFone)
for the three months ended January 31, 2007 by correcting
an error on page 35 in which a portion of VeriFones
total assets was misallocated to its North America segment
rather than its International segment. While this
Form 10-Q/A sets forth the complete text of the
Form 10-Q, no additional new information or language has
been added to the text. This Form 10-Q/A does not reflect
events occurring after the filing of the original Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q or modify or update any disclosures
affected by subsequent events.
As required by Rule 12b-15 promulgated under the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, VeriFones principal executive
officer and principal financial officer are providing
Rule 13a-14(a) certifications dated March 12, 2007 in
connection with this Form 10-Q/A (but otherwise identical
to their prior certifications) and are also furnishing, but not
filing, written statements pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 dated March 12, 2007 (but
otherwise identical to their prior statements).
Table
of Contents
VeriFone Holdings, Inc.
INDEX
2
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
161,889
|
|
|
$
|
86,564
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowances of $2,267 and $2,364
|
|
|
157,739
|
|
|
|
119,839
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
130,815
|
|
|
|
86,631
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
13,267
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
24,823
|
|
|
|
12,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
489,835
|
|
|
|
319,244
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
32,461
|
|
|
|
7,300
|
|
Purchased intangible assets, net
|
|
|
201,130
|
|
|
|
16,544
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
534,703
|
|
|
|
52,689
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
25,225
|
|
|
|
21,706
|
|
Debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
10,659
|
|
|
|
10,987
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
13,816
|
|
|
|
12,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,307,829
|
|
|
$
|
452,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
69,893
|
|
|
$
|
66,685
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
19,667
|
|
|
|
16,202
|
|
Accrued warranty
|
|
|
5,843
|
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
Deferred revenue, net
|
|
|
34,101
|
|
|
|
23,567
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,306
|
|
|
|
4,752
|
|
Accrued transaction costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
45,185
|
|
|
|
16,624
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
5,058
|
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
Restructuring short-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
190,729
|
|
|
|
152,668
|
|
Accrued warranty
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
12,324
|
|
|
|
7,371
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
495,065
|
|
|
|
190,904
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
42,925
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
12,383
|
|
|
|
1,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
753,874
|
|
|
|
354,204
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock: 10,000 shares
authorized as of January 31, 2007 and October 31,
2006; zero and zero shares issued and outstanding as of
January 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock: $0.01 par value,
100,000 shares authorized at January 31, 2007 and
October 31, 2006; 82,440 and 68,148 shares issued and
outstanding as of January 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
595,983
|
|
|
|
140,569
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(44,452
|
)
|
|
|
(43,468
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
553,955
|
|
|
|
98,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,307,829
|
|
|
$
|
452,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System Solutions
|
|
$
|
189,229
|
|
|
$
|
118,685
|
|
Services
|
|
|
27,397
|
|
|
|
15,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
216,626
|
|
|
|
134,630
|
|
Cost of net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System Solutions
|
|
|
122,649
|
|
|
|
67,115
|
|
Services
|
|
|
12,597
|
|
|
|
7,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of net revenues
|
|
|
135,246
|
|
|
|
75,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
81,380
|
|
|
|
59,602
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
16,806
|
|
|
|
11,407
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
22,523
|
|
|
|
14,201
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
18,405
|
|
|
|
9,698
|
|
Amortization of purchased
intangible assets
|
|
|
5,328
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
6,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
69,592
|
|
|
|
36,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11,788
|
|
|
|
23,137
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,756
|
)
|
|
|
(3,279
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
20,746
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
6,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(984
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used in
computing net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
80,993
|
|
|
|
65,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
80,993
|
|
|
|
68,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(984
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,794
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of purchased
intangibles
|
|
|
14,934
|
|
|
|
2,752
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of
property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Amortization of capitalized software
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
6,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
7,475
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities before changes in working capital
|
|
|
30,660
|
|
|
|
18,793
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(4,643
|
)
|
|
|
(5,543
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
20,919
|
|
|
|
(3,503
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(3,215
|
)
|
|
|
(956
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,726
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(10,744
|
)
|
|
|
(5,298
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(1,989
|
)
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
Tax benefit from stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
(2,351
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
(4,080
|
)
|
|
|
(1,512
|
)
|
Accrued warranty
|
|
|
(1,226
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
6,597
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(2,707
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
31,687
|
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software development costs
capitalized
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
Purchase of property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
(6,972
|
)
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
Purchase of other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,950
|
)
|
Sales and maturities of marketable
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,150
|
|
Acquisition of business, net of
cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
|
|
(269,965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(277,813
|
)
|
|
|
(6,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt, net
of costs
|
|
|
304,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
Repayments of capital leases
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
Tax benefit of stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
Proceeds from exercises of stock
options and other
|
|
|
13,881
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
321,178
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange
rate changes on cash
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
75,325
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
|
86,564
|
|
|
|
65,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period
|
|
$
|
161,889
|
|
|
$
|
66,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash
flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
3,556
|
|
|
$
|
3,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
$
|
2,404
|
|
|
$
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of
non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock and stock
options for business acquisition
|
|
$
|
431,839
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Note 1.
|
Description
of Business
|
VeriFone Holdings, Inc. (VeriFone or the
Company) was incorporated in the state of Delaware
on June 13, 2002. VeriFone designs, markets, and services
transaction automation systems that enable secure electronic
payments among consumers, merchants, and financial institutions.
On November 1, 2006, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding ordinary shares of Lipman Electronic Engineering
Ltd. (Lipman). The consideration paid to acquire
Lipman was $344.7 million in cash, 13,462,474 shares
of common stock of the Company and assumption of all outstanding
Lipman stock options. See Note 3 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
related to this business combination.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
Unaudited
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
January 31, 2007 and the consolidated statements of
operations and cash flows for the three months ended
January 31, 2007 and 2006 are unaudited. These unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for interim financial information and
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
In the opinion of the Companys management, the unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial
statements and include all adjustments of a normal recurring
nature necessary for the fair presentation of the Companys
financial position as of January 31, 2007 and its results
of operations and cash flows for the three months ended
January 31, 2007 and 2006. The results for the interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for any future period or for the fiscal year ending
October 31, 2007. The consolidated balance sheet as of
October 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited
consolidated balance sheet as of that date. Certain amounts
reported in previous periods have been reclassified to conform
to the current period presentation. The reclassifications did
not impact previously reported revenues, total operating
expense, operating income, net income, or stockholders
equity.
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in
the Companys 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
December 18, 2006.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on
historical experience and other various assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results could differ from those estimates, and such differences
may be material to the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
The Companys revenue recognition policy is consistent with
applicable revenue recognition guidance and interpretations,
including the requirements of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 00-21
(EITF
00-21),
6
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,
Statement of Position
97-2
(SOP 97-2),
Software Revenue Recognition, Statement of Position
81-1
(SOP 81-1)
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain
Production Type Contracts, Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104),
Revenue Recognition, and other applicable revenue
recognition guidance and interpretations.
The Company records revenue when all four of the following
criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence that an
arrangement exists; (ii) delivery of the products
and/or
services has occurred; (iii) the selling price is fixed or
determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably
assured. Cash received in advance of revenue recognition is
recorded as deferred revenue, net.
Net revenues from System Solutions sales to end-users,
resellers, value added resellers and distributors are recognized
upon shipment of the product with the following exceptions:
|
|
|
|
|
if a product is shipped free on board destination, revenue is
recognized when the shipment is delivered, or
|
|
|
|
if an acceptance or a contingency clause exists, revenue is
recognized upon the earlier of receipt of the acceptance letter
or when the clause lapses.
|
End-users, resellers, value added resellers and distributors
generally have no rights of return, stock rotation rights or
price protection.
The Companys System Solutions sales include software that
is incidental to the electronic payment devices and services
included in its sales arrangements.
The Company enters into revenue arrangements for individual
products or services. As a System Solutions provider, the
Companys sales arrangements often include support services
in addition to electronic payment devices (multiple
deliverables). These services may include installation,
training, consulting, customer support, product maintenance
and/or
refurbishment arrangements.
Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are evaluated to
determine if the deliverables (items) should be divided into
more than one unit of accounting. An item can generally be
considered a separate unit of accounting if all of the following
criteria are met:
|
|
|
|
|
the delivered item(s) has value to the customer on a standalone
basis;
|
|
|
|
there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of
the undelivered item(s); and
|
|
|
|
if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative
to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the
undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in
the control of the Company.
|
Deliverables which do not meet these criteria are combined into
a single unit of accounting.
If there is objective and reliable evidence of fair value for
all units of accounting, the arrangement consideration is
allocated to the separate units of accounting based on their
relative fair values. In cases where there is objective and
reliable evidence of the fair value(s) of the undelivered
item(s) in an arrangement but no such evidence for one or more
of the delivered item(s), the residual method is used to
allocate the arrangement consideration. In cases in which there
is no objective and reliable evidence of the fair value(s) of
the undelivered item(s), the Company defers all revenues for the
arrangement until the period in which the last item is
delivered. However, items which do not meet these criteria are
combined into a single unit of accounting.
For revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables, upon
shipment of its electronic payment devices, the Company
allocates the fair value for all remaining undelivered elements
and recognizes the residual amount within the arrangement as
revenue for the delivered items as prescribed in EITF
00-21.
Revenues for the Companys arrangements that include
multiple elements are allocated to each undelivered element
based on the fair value of each element. Fair value is
determined based on the price charged when each element is sold
separately
and/or the
price charged by third parties for similar services.
7
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net revenues from services such as customer support and product
maintenance are initially deferred and then recognized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the contract. Net revenues
from services such as installations, equipment repairs,
refurbishment arrangements, training and consulting are
recognized as the services are rendered.
For software development contracts, the Company recognizes
revenue using the completed contracts method pursuant to
SOP 81-1.
During the period of performance of such contracts, billings and
costs are accumulated on the balance sheet, but no profit is
recorded before completion or substantial completion of the
work. The Company uses customers acceptance of such
products as the specific criteria to determine when such
contracts are substantially completed. Provisions for losses on
software development contracts are recorded in the period they
become evident.
For operating lease arrangements, the Company recognizes the
revenue ratably over the term of the lease.
In addition, the Company sells products to leasing companies
that, in turn, lease these products to end-users. In
transactions where the leasing companies have no recourse to the
Company in the event of default by the end-user, the Company
recognizes revenue at the point of shipment or point of
delivery, depending on the shipping terms and when all the other
revenue recognition criteria have been met. In arrangements
where the leasing companies have substantive recourse to the
Company in the event of default by the end-user, the Company
recognizes both the product revenue and the related cost of the
product as the payments are made to the leasing company by the
end-user, generally ratably over the lease term.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, where the
local currency is the functional currency, are translated from
their respective functional currencies into U.S. dollars at
the rates in effect at the balance sheet date, with resulting
foreign currency translation adjustments recorded as other
accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet. Revenue and expense
amounts are translated at average rates during the period.
Gains and losses realized from transactions, including
inter-company balances not considered as a permanent investment,
and denominated in currencies other than an entitys
functional currency are included in other income (expense), net
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Cash is placed on deposit in major financial institutions in the
United States and other countries. Such deposits may be in
excess of insured limits. Management believes that the financial
institutions that hold the Companys cash are financially
sound and, accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect
to these balances.
The Company invests cash not required for use in operations in
high credit quality securities based on its investment policy.
The investment policy has restrictions based on credit quality,
investment concentration, investment type and maturity that the
Company believes will result in reduced risk of loss of capital.
Investments are of a short-term nature and include investments
in money market funds and auction rate and corporate debt
securities. The Company has reflected the duration of auction
rate securities based on their reset feature. Rates on these
securities typically reset every 7, 28 or 35 days. The
auction rate securities generally have a final maturity
extending 15 to 30 years or more.
The Company has not experienced any investment losses due to
institutional failure or bankruptcy.
The Companys accounts receivable are derived from sales to
a large number of direct customers, resellers, and distributors
in the Americas, Europe, and the Asia Pacific region. The
Company performs ongoing evaluations of its customers
financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended
when deemed necessary, but generally requires no collateral.
8
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined with respect to
those amounts that the Company has determined to be doubtful of
collection using specific identification of doubtful accounts
and an aging of receivables analysis based on invoice due dates.
Actual collection losses may differ from managements
estimates, and such differences could be material to the
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. Uncollectible receivables are written off against the
allowance for doubtful accounts when all efforts to collect them
have been exhausted and recoveries are recognized when they are
received. Generally, accounts receivable are past due after
30 days of an invoice date unless special payment terms are
provided.
In the three months ended January 31, 2007 and 2006, one
customer, First Data Corporation and its affiliates, accounted
for 9% and 11%, respectively, of net revenues. At
January 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006, First Data
Corporation and its affiliates accounted for 10% and 13%,
respectively, of accounts receivable. No other customer
accounted for 10% or more of net revenues for any period
presented or accounted for 10% or more of accounts receivable at
either January 31, 2007 or October 31, 2006.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of
nonperformance by counterparties on the foreign currency forward
contracts used to mitigate the effect of exchange rate changes
and interest rate caps used to mitigate the effect of interest
rate changes. These counterparties are large international
financial institutions and to date, no such counterparty has
failed to meet its financial obligations to the Company. The
Company does not anticipate nonperformance by these
counterparties.
Besides those noted above, the Company had no other
off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk, such as option
contracts or other derivative arrangements as of
January 31, 2007 or October 31, 2006.
Product
Manufacturing
The Company outsources a substantial amount of the manufacturing
of its products to contract manufacturers with facilities in
China, Singapore, and Brazil. The Company also utilizes
third-party service providers in the United States, Canada,
United Kingdom, Poland, France, Italy, Spain, and Mexico for its
equipment repair service. In the three months ended
January 31, 2007, the Company added in-house manufacturing
and services capabilities in Israel and Turkey as a result of
the Lipman acquisition.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash
equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, long-term debt, foreign currency forward
contracts and interest rate caps. Foreign currency forward
contracts and interest rate caps are recorded at fair value. The
estimated fair value of cash, accounts receivable and accounts
payable approximates their carrying value due to the short
period of time to their maturities. The estimated value of
long-term debt approximates its carrying value since the rate of
interest on the long-term debt adjusts to market rates on a
periodic basis. The fair value of cash equivalents, marketable
securities, foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate
caps are based on quotes from brokers using market prices for
those or similar instruments.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge
certain existing and anticipated foreign currency denominated
transactions. The terms of foreign currency forward contracts
used are generally consistent with the timing of the foreign
currency transactions. Under its foreign currency risk
management strategy, the Company utilizes derivative instruments
to protect its interests from unanticipated fluctuations in
earnings and cash flows caused by volatility in currency
exchange rates. This financial exposure is monitored and managed
by the Company as an integral part of its overall risk
management program which focuses on the unpredictability of
financial markets and seeks to reduce the potentially adverse
effects that the volatility of these markets may have on its
operating results. The Company also enters into interest rate
caps in order to manage its variable interest rate risk on its
secured credit facility.
9
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company records derivatives, namely foreign currency forward
contracts and interest rate caps, on the balance sheet at fair
value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives which do not
qualify or are not effective as hedges are recognized currently
in earnings. The Company does not use derivative financial
instruments for speculative or trading purposes, nor does it
hold or issue leveraged derivative financial instruments.
The Company formally documents relationships between hedging
instruments and associated hedged items. This documentation
includes: identification of the specific foreign currency asset,
liability or forecasted transaction being hedged; the nature of
the risk being hedged; the hedge objective; and, the method of
assessing hedge effectiveness. Hedge effectiveness is formally
assessed, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, to
determine whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions
are highly effective in offsetting changes in foreign currency
denominated assets, liabilities and anticipated cash flow or
hedged items. When an anticipated transaction is no longer
likely to occur, the corresponding derivative instrument is
ineffective as a hedge, and changes in fair value of the
instrument are recognized in net income.
The Companys international sales are generally denominated
in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. For sales in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the volatility of
the foreign currency markets represents risk to the
Companys margins. The Company defines its exposure as the
risk of changes in the functional-currency-equivalent cash flows
(generally U.S. dollars) attributable to changes in the
related foreign currency exchange rates. From time to time the
Company enters into certain foreign currency forward contracts
with terms designed to substantially match those of the
underlying exposure. The Company does not qualify these foreign
currency forward contracts as hedging instruments and, as such,
records the changes in the fair value of these derivatives
immediately in other income (expense), net in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. As of January 31,
2007 and October 31, 2006, the Company did not have any
outstanding foreign currency forward contracts. On
February 1, 2007 the Company entered into foreign currency
forward contracts to sell Australian dollars, British pounds,
Mexican pesos and Euros with notional amounts of
$2.8 million, $7.2 million, $3.4 million and
$16.3 million, respectively, to hedge exposures to those
currencies. The Companys foreign currency forward
contracts have maturities of 95 days or less.
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk related to its
debt, which bears interest based upon the three-month LIBOR
rate. On October 31, 2006, the Company entered into a
Credit Agreement (the New Credit Facility) with a
syndicate of financial institutions, led by J.P. Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A. and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. The New Credit
Facility provided by the Credit Agreement consists of a Term B
Loan facility of $500 million and a revolver loan
permitting borrowings of up to $40 million. The Term B Loan
was drawn down in its entirety on October 31 and
November 1, 2006. Under the New Credit Facility, the
Company is required to fix the interest rate through swaps, rate
caps, collars and similar agreements with respect to at least
30% of the outstanding principal amount of all loans and other
indebtedness that have floating interest rates.
In May and December 2006, the Company purchased new two-year
interest rate caps for a total premium of $118,000. The interest
rate caps have an initial notional amount of $200 million
declining to $150 million after one year under which the
Company will receive interest payments if the three-month LIBOR
rate exceeds 6.5%. The interest rate caps were purchased to fix
the interest rate related to the existing secured credit
facility, or any refinancing thereof which is explained in
Note 5. The fair value of the interest rate caps as of
January 31, 2007 was $11,000 which was recorded in prepaid
expenses and other current assets in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets, with the related $106,000 unrealized loss
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of a $41,000 tax benefit.
For the three months ended January 31, 2006, the Company
received interest of $31,000 as a result of the three-month
LIBOR rate on its Term B Loan exceeding the cap rate which is
recorded as an offset of interest expense in the statements of
operations.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash, money market funds,
and other highly liquid investments with maturities of three
months or less when purchased.
10
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Marketable
Securities
The Company classifies its marketable securities as
available-for-sale
in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
Available-for-sale
securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding
gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive
income, which is a separate component of stockholders
equity, net of tax, in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. The amortization of premiums and discounts on the
investments and realized gains and losses, determined by
specific identification based on the trade date of the
transactions, are recorded in interest income in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Equity
Earnings (Loss) in Affiliate
The Company made a minority investment in VeriFone
Transportation Systems (VTS) in October 2005. The
investment in VTS is accounted for under the equity method and
included in the other assets in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. The earnings (loss) relating to
this investment is insignificant and included in the other
income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. In February 2007, the Company
increased its ownership percentage in VTS to 51%. See
Note 14 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information related to Subsequent
Events.
Minority
Interest
The Company owns the majority of its Chinese subsidiary which it
acquired in the acquisition of Lipman and as such consolidated
its Chinese subsidiary. For the three months ended
January 31, 2007 the minority interest in income of the
subsidiary is immaterial.
Debt
Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs are stated at cost, net of accumulated
amortization. Amortization expense is calculated using the
effective interest method and recorded in interest expense in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost or market.
Standard costs approximate the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. The Company regularly
monitors inventory quantities on hand and records write-downs
for excess and obsolete inventories based primarily on the
Companys estimated forecast of product demand and
production requirements. Such write-downs establish a new
cost-basis of accounting for the related inventory. Actual
inventory losses may differ from managements estimates.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are expensed as incurred and are
included in cost of net revenues in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of operations. In those instances where
the Company bills shipping and handling costs to customers, the
amounts billed are classified as revenue.
Warranty
Costs
The Company accrues for estimated warranty obligations when
revenue is recognized based on an estimate of future warranty
costs for delivered products. Such estimates are based on
historical experience and expectations of future costs. The
Company periodically evaluates and adjusts the accrued warranty
costs to the extent actual warranty costs vary from the original
estimates. The Companys warranty period typically extends
from 13 months to five years from the date of shipment.
Costs associated with maintenance contracts, including extended
warranty contracts, are expensed when they are incurred. Actual
warranty costs may differ from managements estimates.
11
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Research
and Development Costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Costs
eligible for capitalization under SFAS No. 86,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be
Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed, were
$0.9 million and $0.4 million for the three months
ended January 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Capitalized
software development costs of $8.4 million and
$7.5 million as of January 31, 2007 and
October 31, 2006, respectively, are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over the estimated life of the product to
which the costs relate, ranging from three to five years. These
costs, net of accumulated amortization of $3.5 million and
$3.2 million as of January 31, 2007 and
October 31, 2006, respectively, are recorded in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled
approximately $391,000 and $21,000 for the three months ended
January 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the
tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts
using enacted tax rates in effect for the year the differences
are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation
allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is
expected to be realized on a more likely than not basis.
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other
comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes
certain changes in equity that are excluded from results of
operations. Specifically, foreign currency translation
adjustments, changes in the fair value of derivatives designated
as hedges and unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale
marketable securities are included in accumulated other
comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property, plant and
equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, generally two to ten
years, except buildings which are 15 years. The cost of
equipment under capital leases is recorded at the lower of the
present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of
the assets and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
shorter of the term of the related lease or the estimated useful
life of the asset. Amortization of assets under capital leases
is included with depreciation expense.
Goodwill
and Other Purchased Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other purchased intangible assets have been
recorded as a result of the Companys acquisitions.
Goodwill is not amortized for accounting purposes but is
deductible for tax purposes over 15 years. Purchased
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful
lives, generally one and one-half to five years.
The Company is required to perform an annual impairment test of
goodwill. Should certain events or indicators of impairment
occur between annual impairment tests, the Company performs the
impairment test of goodwill at that date. In the first step of
the analysis, the Companys assets and liabilities,
including existing goodwill and other intangible assets, are
assigned to these identified reporting units to determine their
carrying value. Based on how the business is managed, the
Company has five reporting units. Goodwill was allocated to the
reporting unit based on its relative contribution to the
Companys operating results. If the carrying value of a
reporting unit is in excess of its fair value, an impairment may
exist, and the Company must perform the second step of comparing
the implied fair value of the goodwill to its carrying value to
determine the impairment charge, if any.
12
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of the reporting units is determined using the
income approach. The income approach focuses on the
income-producing capability of an asset, measuring the current
value of the asset by calculating the present value of its
future economic benefits such as cash earnings, cost savings,
tax deductions, and proceeds from disposition. Value indications
are developed by discounting expected cash flows to their
present value at a rate of return that incorporates the
risk-free rate for the use of funds, the expected rate of
inflation, and risks associated with the particular investment.
For the three months ended January 31, 2007, no impairment
charges have been recorded.
Accounting
for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company periodically evaluates whether changes have occurred
that would require revision of the remaining useful life of
equipment and improvements and purchased intangible assets or
render them not recoverable. If such circumstances arise, the
Company uses an estimate of the undiscounted value of expected
future operating cash flows to determine whether the long-lived
assets are impaired. If the aggregate undiscounted cash flows
are less than the carrying amount of the assets, the resulting
impairment charge to be recorded is calculated based on the
excess of the carrying value of the assets over the fair value
of such assets, with the fair value determined based on an
estimate of discounted future cash flows. For the three months
ended January 31, 2007, no impairment charges have been
recorded.
Stock
Based Compensation
The Company follows the fair value recognition and measurement
provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123(R)).
SFAS 123(R) is applicable for stock-based awards exchanged
for employee services and in certain circumstances for
non-employee directors. Pursuant to SFAS 123(R),
stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date,
based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as
expense over the requisite service period.
Severance
Pay
The Companys liability for severance pay to its Israeli
employees is calculated pursuant to Israeli severance pay law
based on the most recent salary of the employee multiplied by
the number of years of employment of such employee as of the
applicable balance sheet date. Employees are entitled to one
months salary for each year of employment, or a pro-rata
portion thereof. The Company funds the liability by monthly
deposits in insurance policies and severance pay funds. The
expense for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 was $289,000.
Segment
Reporting
The Company maintains two reportable segments, North America,
consisting of the United States and Canada, and International,
consisting of all other countries in which the Company makes
sales outside of the United States and Canada.
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing
income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period, less the weighted average number of common shares
subject to repurchase. Diluted net income (loss) per common
share is computed using the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding plus the effect of common stock equivalents,
unless the common stock equivalents are anti-dilutive.
13
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income
(loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(984
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares of voting
common stock outstanding
|
|
|
81,994
|
|
|
|
67,707
|
|
Less: weighted-average shares
subject to repurchase
|
|
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
|
(2,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used in
computing basic net income per share
|
|
|
80,993
|
|
|
|
65,705
|
|
Add dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares subject to
repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,002
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used in
computing diluted net income per share
|
|
|
80,993
|
|
|
|
68,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended January 31, 2007 and 2006,
options to purchase 5,370,846 and restricted stock units
covering 366,000 common shares, respectively, were excluded from
the calculation of weighted average shares for diluted net
income per share as they were anti-dilutive.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position. FIN 48
indicates that an enterprise shall initially recognize the
financial statement effects of a tax position when it is more
likely than not of being sustained on examination, based on the
technical merits of the position. In addition, FIN 48
indicates that the measurement of a tax position that meets the
more likely than not threshold shall consider the amounts and
probabilities of the outcomes that could be realized upon
ultimate settlement. This interpretation is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006 and interim periods
within those fiscal years. The Company is in the process of
evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on the
Companys consolidated results of operations, financial
position or cash flows.
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does
not require any new fair value measurements but rather
eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior
accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods
within those fiscal years. The implementation of SFAS 157
is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash
flows.
14
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements (SAB 108).
SAB 108 provides guidance on the consideration of the
effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year
misstatements for the purpose of determining whether the current
years financial statements are materially misstated.
SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2006. The implementation of SAB 108 is
not expected to have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash
flows.
|
|
Note 3.
|
Business
Combination
|
Lipman
Electronic Engineering Ltd. (Lipman)
On November 1, 2006, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding common stock of Lipman. The Company acquired Lipman
to enhance the Companys ability to reach certain of its
strategic and business objectives, which include
(i) extending the Companys product and service
offerings to include Lipmans products, (ii) enabling
the Company to leverage its distribution channels, international
presence, customer base, and brand recognition to accelerate
Lipmans market penetration and growth, (iii) enabling
the Company to enhance its position in areas where the Company
is already strong by offering complementary products and
services developed by Lipman, (iv) enhancing its product
offerings in a variety of its core product areas, and
(v) enhance the Companys manufacturing capacity.
The consideration paid to acquire Lipman was $344.7 million
in cash, 13,462,474 shares of common stock of the Company
and assumption of all outstanding Lipman stock options. To fund
a portion of the cash consideration, the Company used
$307.2 million of Term B Loan under its New Credit Facility
on November 1, 2006. See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
related to New Credit Facility.
The purchase price is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
344,747
|
|
Value of common stock issued
|
|
|
417,606
|
|
Value of Lipman vested and
unvested options assumed
|
|
|
38,221
|
|
Transaction costs and expenses
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
825,574
|
|
Less: Value of unvested Lipman
options assumed
|
|
|
(23,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
801,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the proration and allocation provisions of the
merger agreement, the total merger consideration consisted of
(i) a number of shares of the Company common stock equal to
the product of 0.50 multiplied by the number of Lipman ordinary
shares issued and outstanding on the closing date and
(ii) an amount in cash equal to the product of $12.804
multiplied by the number of Lipman ordinary shares issued and
outstanding on the closing date, as reduced by the aggregate
amount of the special cash dividend paid by Lipman prior to the
merger. The Company issued 13,462,474 shares of common
stock and paid $344.7 million (excluding the aggregate
amount of the special cash dividend).
The 13,462,474 shares have been valued at $31.02 per
share based on an average of the closing prices of the
Companys common stock for a range of trading days two days
before April 10, 2006, the announcement date of the
proposed merger, the announcement date and two days after the
announcement date.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Company assumed, on a
one-for-one
basis, all Lipman share options outstanding at closing. The
Company assumed options to purchase approximately
3,372,527 shares of Lipman ordinary shares at a weighted
average exercise price of $24.47. The fair value of the
outstanding vested and unvested options of $38.2 million,
was determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model using the
following assumptions:
15
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
stock price of $31.02 per share, expected term of
2.5 years, expected volatility of 41% and risk free
interest rate of 4.7%.
For accounting purposes the fair value of unvested options as of
the closing date is deducted in determining the purchase price
and this unrecognized share-based compensation is being
recognized as compensation expense on a straight line basis over
the estimated remaining service period of 3.1 years. The
fair value of the outstanding unvested options of
$24.0 million, was determined using a Black-Scholes
valuation model using the following assumptions: Stock price of
$30.00 per share of the Company common stock on
November 1, 2006, expected term of 2.8 years, expected
volatility of 41% and risk-free interest rate of 4.6%. The
Company determined the number of vested options based on the
ratio of the number of months of service provided by employees
as of November 1, 2006 to the total vesting period for the
options (vested ratio).
Under the purchase method of accounting, the total estimated
purchase price as shown in the table above is allocated to
Lipmans tangible and intangible assets acquired,
liabilities assumed as well as in-process research and
development based on their estimated fair values as of the
closing date. The excess of the purchase price over the net
tangible and intangible assets is recorded as goodwill. The
preliminary allocation of the purchase price is based on
preliminary estimates and currently available information.
Based on the preliminary valuation which has not been finalized
and other information currently available, the preliminary
estimated purchase price is allocated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
95,931
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
33,257
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
65,103
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
20,118
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
18,174
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(8,890
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(60,741
|
)
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(44,689
|
)
|
Non curent liabilities
|
|
|
(7,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible assets
|
|
|
111,123
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Developed and core technology
|
|
|
131,370
|
|
Customer backlog
|
|
|
220
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
64,470
|
|
Internal use software
|
|
|
3,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
199,520
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
6,530
|
|
Excess over fair value of vested
options
|
|
|
728
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
483,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preliminary estimated
purchase price allocation
|
|
$
|
801,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Tangible Assets
Of the total estimated purchase price, a preliminary estimate of
approximately $111.1 million has been allocated to net
tangible assets acquired. The Company has valued net tangible
assets at their respective carrying amounts as of
November 1, 2006, except inventory, deferred revenue,
accrued liabilities and deferred taxes as the
16
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company believes these amounts approximate their current fair
value or the fair values have not yet been determined.
The Company has increased Lipmans historical value of
inventory by $13.4 million to adjust inventory to an amount
equivalent to the selling price less an appropriate sales
margin. The Company reduced Lipmans historical value of
deferred revenue by $4.0 million to adjust deferred revenue
to an amount equivalent to the estimated cost plus an
appropriate margin to perform the services related to
Lipmans service contracts. As the Company finalizes its
fair value analysis, additional adjustments will be made to the
net tangible assets acquired including property, plant and
equipment.
The Company has identified and recorded provisions related to
certain pre-acquisition contingencies of $12.2 million
related to liabilities that are probable and the amount of the
liability is reasonably estimated. With respect to certain other
identified pre-acquisition contingencies, including the second
matter in Note 7 with respect to the Companys
Brazilian subsidiaries, the Company continues to accumulate
information to assess whether or not the related asset,
liability or impairment is probable and the amount of the asset,
liability or impairment can be reasonably estimated and as such
accrued in the purchase price allocation prior to the end of the
purchase price allocation period.
Pursuant to a detailed restructuring plan which is not complete,
the Company accrued $5.5 million of costs for severance,
costs of vacating facilities and costs to exit or terminate
other duplicative activities in accordance with the requirement
of
EITF 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination (see Note 6). As the Company
finalizes it restructuring plan, additional amounts may be
accrued into the purchase price.
Intangible
Assets
Developed product technology, which comprises products that have
reached technological feasibility, includes products in
Lipmans product lines, principally the Nurit product line.
Lipmans technology and products are designed for hardware,
software, solutions and services, serving the POS market
internationally. This proprietary know-how can be leveraged by
the Company to develop new technology and improved products and
manufacturing processes. The Company expects to amortize the
developed and core technology and patents over an average
estimated life of 3 to 6 years.
Customer relationships represent the distribution channels
through which Lipman sells the majority of its products and
services. The Company expects to amortize the fair value of
these assets over an average estimated life of 3 to 5 years.
Internal use software represents the internal use software
assets which have been developed internally but have not
previously been capitalized. The Company expects to amortize the
fair value of these assets over the estimated useful life of 3
to 5 years.
The fair value of intangible assets was based on a preliminary
third-party valuation using an income approach, as well as
discussions with Lipman management and a review of certain
transaction-related documents and forecasts prepared by the
Company and Lipman management. The rate utilized to discount net
cash flows to their present values is 13%. These discount rates
were determined after consideration of the Companys
weighted average cost of capital specific to this transaction.
Estimated useful lives for the intangible assets were based on
historical experience with technology life cycles, product
roadmaps, branding strategy, historical and projected
maintenance renewal rates, historical treatment of the Company
acquisition-related intangible assets and the Companys
intended future use of the intangible assets.
Certain deferred tax liabilities have been recorded based upon
preliminary conclusions regarding the tax positions expected to
be taken and prior to the completion of the third party
valuation of Lipmans assets. Included in the amounts
recorded on a preliminary basis is an approximate
$32 million foreign deferred tax liability recorded in
connection with undistributed pre-acquisition foreign earnings
subject to an approved enterprise status in Israel.
17
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In-process
Research and Development
Of the total estimated purchase price, $6.5 million has
been allocated to in-process research and development and was
charged to expense in the quarter ended January 31, 2007.
In-process research and development represents incomplete Lipman
research and development projects that had not reached
technological feasibility and had no alternative future use.
Lipman was developing new products that qualify as in-process
research and development in multiple product areas.
Lipmans research and development projects were focused on
developing new products, integrating new technologies, improving
product performance and broadening features and functionalities.
The principal research and development efforts of Lipman are
related to four products. There is a risk that these
developments and enhancements will not be competitive with other
products using alternative technologies that offer comparable
functionality.
The value assigned to in-process research and development was
determined by considering the importance of each project to the
overall development plan, estimating costs to develop the
purchased in-process research and development into commercially
viable products, estimating the resulting net cash flows from
the projects when completed and discounting the net cash flows
to their present value. The revenue estimates used to value the
purchased in-process research and development were based on
estimates of relevant market sizes and growth factors, expected
trends in technology and the nature and expected timing of new
product introductions by Lipman and its competitors.
The rates utilized to discount the net cash flows to their
present value were based on the Companys weighted average
cost of capital. The weighted average cost of capital was
adjusted to reflect the difficulties and uncertainties in
completing each project and thereby achieving technological
feasibility, the percentage of completion of each project,
anticipated market acceptance and penetration, market growth
rates and risks related to the impact of potential changes in
future target markets. Based on these factors, a discount rate
of 19% was deemed appropriate for valuing the in-process
research and development.
Excess
over fair value of vested options
Due to the difference in the exchange ratio for Lipman options
to purchase shares of
one-for-one
and the all stock exchange ratio of 0.9336 (the all stock
consideration exchange ratio of 0.9844 as reduced by the per
share value of the $1.50 per share special cash dividend)
for Lipman ordinary shares, the Company recognized $728,000 of
share-based compensation for the excess fair value of vested
options in the quarter ended January 31, 2007.
Goodwill
Of the total purchase price, approximately $484 million is
estimated to be allocated to goodwill. Goodwill represents the
excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the
fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets,
in-process research and development and excess of fair value of
vested options. Goodwill will not be amortized but instead will
be tested for impairment at least annually (more frequently if
certain indicators are present). In the event that the
management of the combined company determines that the value of
goodwill has become impaired, the combined company will incur an
accounting charge for the amount of impairment during the fiscal
quarter in which the determination is made. The goodwill has
been allocated $477.1 million to the International segment
and $6.6 million to the North America segment. The goodwill
is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
As of January 31, 2007, the purchase price allocation is
preliminary and is subject to adjustment for final valuation of
intangible assets, for property, plant and equipment fair value,
pre-acquisition contingencies, deferred taxes and
EITF 95-3
restructuring.
The results of operations of Lipman are included in the
Companys consolidated financial statements from November
2006. The following table represents pro forma results of
operations and gives effect to the acquisition of Lipman as if
the acquisition was consummated at the beginning of fiscal year
2006. The unaudited pro forma results
18
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of operations are not necessarily indicative of what would have
occurred had the acquisition been made as of the beginning of
the period or of the results that may occur in the future. Net
income includes the write-off of acquired IPR&D of
$6.5 million, additional interest expense of
$6.5 million, deferred revenue step down of
$1.5 million, fair value step up of inventory of
$10.3 million, stock compensation for the excess fair value
on vested options of $0.7 million, and amortization of
intangible assets related to the acquisition of
$14.9 million. The unaudited pro forma information is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
201.9
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5.5
|
)
|
Net loss per share
basic
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Net loss per share
diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
The pro forma amounts above were compiled using the three month
period ending December 31, 2005 for Lipman, whose revenue
has historically been subject to monthly variations, and the
three month period ending January 31, 2006 for VeriFone.
PayWare
On September 1, 2006, the Company acquired PayWare, the
payment systems business of Trintech Group PLC for approximately
$10.9 million, comprised of $9.9 million in cash
consideration and $1.0 million transaction costs. The
Company acquired PayWare to broaden the Companys EMEA
presence at the point of sale beyond its core solutions. The
Companys consolidated financial statements include the
operating results of the business acquired from the date of
acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been
presented because the effect of the acquisition was not material.
The total estimated purchase price of $10.9 million was
allocated as follows: $6.4 million to goodwill (not
deductible for income tax purposes), $8.0 million to
intangible assets comprised of developed technology of
$3.0 million, backlog of $1.4 million, customer
relationships of $3.6 million, $2.9 million to
restructuring costs and $0.6 million to net tangible
liabilities acquired. The estimated useful economic lives of the
identifiable intangible assets acquired are 3 to 5 years
for the developed technology, one year for backlog, and 4 to
5 years for the customer relationship. The weighted average
amortization period for developed technology and customer
relationships was 3.7 years. As of January 31, 2007,
the purchase price allocation is preliminary and subject to
adjustment for any pre-acquisition contingencies.
|
|
Note 4.
|
Balance
Sheet and Statements of Operations Detail
|
Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
31,389
|
|
|
$
|
4,095
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
96,792
|
|
|
|
81,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
130,815
|
|
|
$
|
86,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Prepaid
Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
21,104
|
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
Receivable, other
|
|
|
3,431
|
|
|
|
3,355
|
|
Other
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
4,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,823
|
|
|
$
|
12,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment, net consisted of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
$
|
10,749
|
|
|
$
|
7,049
|
|
Office equipment, furniture and
fixtures
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
12,822
|
|
|
|
5,602
|
|
Leasehold improvement
|
|
|
6,997
|
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
Land
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
5,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
48,720
|
|
|
|
21,486
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(16,259
|
)
|
|
|
(14,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
32,461
|
|
|
$
|
7,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006, equipment
amounting to $1.3 million was capitalized under capital
leases. Related accumulated amortization as of January 31,
2007 and October 31, 2006 amounted to $1.3 million.
Purchased
Intangible Assets, net
Purchased intangible assets subject to amortization consisted of
the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
$
|
35,164
|
|
|
$
|
131,370
|
|
|
$
|
166,534
|
|
|
$
|
(28,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,664
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,280
|
)
|
|
$
|
129,254
|
|
|
$
|
6,548
|
|
Core technology
|
|
|
14,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,442
|
|
|
|
(12,517
|
)
|
|
|
(722
|
)
|
|
|
(13,239
|
)
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
22,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,225
|
|
|
|
(19,942
|
)
|
|
|
(885
|
)
|
|
|
(20,827
|
)
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
Customer backlog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal use software
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,460
|
|
|
|
3,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
19,314
|
|
|
|
64,470
|
|
|
|
83,784
|
|
|
|
(13,526
|
)
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
|
(17,796
|
)
|
|
|
65,988
|
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,145
|
|
|
$
|
199,520
|
|
|
$
|
290,665
|
|
|
$
|
(74,601
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
201,130
|
|
|
$
|
16,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amortization of purchased intangibles was allocated as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Included in cost of net revenues
|
|
$
|
9,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,593
|
|
Included in operating expenses
|
|
|
5,328
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,934
|
|
|
$
|
2,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets
recorded as of January 31, 2007 was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007(remaining nine months)
|
|
$
|
26,694
|
|
|
$
|
14,909
|
|
|
$
|
41,603
|
|
2008
|
|
|
29,449
|
|
|
|
18,210
|
|
|
|
47,659
|
|
2009
|
|
|
26,194
|
|
|
|
17,333
|
|
|
|
43,527
|
|
2010
|
|
|
25,421
|
|
|
|
15,273
|
|
|
|
40,694
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,472
|
|
|
|
23,175
|
|
|
|
27,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,230
|
|
|
$
|
88,900
|
|
|
$
|
201,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
Activity related to goodwill consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
52,689
|
|
|
$
|
47,260
|
|
Additions related to acquisition
|
|
|
483,685
|
|
|
|
6,352
|
|
Resolution of tax contingencies
and adjustments to tax reserves and valuation allowances
established in purchase accounting
|
|
|
(1,671
|
)
|
|
|
(923
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
534,703
|
|
|
$
|
52,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Warranty
Activity related to warranty consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
5,432
|
|
|
$
|
5,243
|
|
Warranty charged to cost of net
revenues
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
Utilization of warranty
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
(943
|
)
|
Changes in estimates
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Warranty assumed on acquisition
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
6,291
|
|
|
|
4,910
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(5,843
|
)
|
|
|
(4,155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term portion
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
revenue, net
Deferred revenue, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
48,653
|
|
|
$
|
34,309
|
|
Less long term portion
|
|
|
(12,324
|
)
|
|
|
(7,371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,329
|
|
|
|
26,938
|
|
Deferred cost of revenue
|
|
|
(2,228
|
)
|
|
|
(3,371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion, net
|
|
$
|
34,101
|
|
|
$
|
23,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense), net consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Refund of foreign customs fees
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Foreign currency transaction
gains, net
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Foreign currency contract losses,
net
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys financing consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Secured credit facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolver
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term B loan
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
192,780
|
|
Capital leases and other
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,123
|
|
|
|
192,889
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(5,058
|
)
|
|
|
(1,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term portion
|
|
$
|
495,065
|
|
|
$
|
190,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
Credit Facility
On October 31, 2006, the Company entered into a Credit
Agreement (the New Credit Facility) with a syndicate
of financial institutions, led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and
Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. The New Credit Facility provided by
the Credit Agreement consists of a Term B Loan facility of
$500 million and a revolving loan permitting borrowings of
up to $40 million. The proceeds from the Term B loan were
used to repay all outstanding amounts relating to an existing
senior secured credit agreement (Old Credit
Facility), pay certain transaction costs and partially
fund the cash consideration in connection with the acquisition
of Lipman on November 1, 2006. As of January 31, 2007,
the Company had drawn all $500 million of the Term B Loan.
The New Credit Facility is guaranteed by the Company and certain
of its subsidiaries and is secured by collateral including
substantially all of the Companys assets and stock of the
Companys subsidiaries. At both January 31, 2007 and
October 31, 2006, the interest rates were 7.12% on the Term
B Loan and 6.87% on the revolving loan. The Company pays a
commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving loan under
its New Credit Facility at a rate that varies between 0.375% and
0.30% per annum depending upon its consolidated total
leverage ratio. At both January 31, 2007 and
October 31, 2006, the Company was paying a commitment fee
at a rate of 0.375% per annum. The Company pays a letter of
credit fee on the unused portion of any letter of credit issued
under the New Credit Facility at a rate that varies between
1.50% and 1.25% per annum depending upon its consolidated
total leverage ratio. At both January 31, 2007 and
October 31, 2006, the Company was subject to a letter of
credit fee at a rate of 1.50% per annum.
At the Companys option, the revolving loan bears interest
at a rate of 1.50% over the three-month LIBOR, which was 5.37%
at both January 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006 or 0.50%
over the lenders base rate, which was 8.25% at both
January 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006, respectively.
As of January 31, 2007, the entire $40 million
revolving loan was available for borrowing to meet short-term
working capital requirements. At the Companys option, the
Term B Loan bears interest at a rate of 1.75% over the
three-month LIBOR or 0.75% over the base rate.
Interest payments are generally paid monthly but can be based on
one, two, three or six month periods. The lenders base
rate is the greater of the Fed Funds rate plus 50 basis
points or the JPMorgan prime rate. The respective maturity dates
on the components of the New Credit Facility are
October 31, 2014 for the revolving loan and
October 31, 2015 for the Term B Loan. Payments on the Term
B Loan are due in equal quarterly installments of
$1.2 million over the seven-year term on the last business
day of each calendar quarter with the balance due on maturity.
The terms of the New Credit Facility require the Company to
comply with financial covenants, including maintaining leverage
and fixed charge coverage ratios, obtaining protection against
fluctuation in interest rates, and limits on capital expenditure
levels at the end of each fiscal quarter. As of January 31,
2007, the Company was
23
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
required to maintain a total leverage ratio of not greater than
4.00 to 1.0 and a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 2.0 to
1.0. Total leverage ratio is equal to total debt less cash as of
the end of a reporting fiscal quarter divided by the
consolidated EBITDA for the most recent four consecutive fiscal
quarters. Some of the financial covenants become more
restrictive over the term of the New Credit Facility.
Noncompliance with any of the financial covenants without cure
or waiver would constitute an event of default under the New
Credit Facility. An event of default resulting from a breach of
a financial covenant may result, at the option of lenders
holding a majority of the loans, in an acceleration of repayment
of the principal and interest outstanding and a termination of
the revolving loan. The New Credit Facility also contains
non-financial covenants that restrict some of the Companys
activities, including its ability to dispose of assets, incur
additional debt, pay dividends, create liens, make investments,
make capital expenditures and engage in specified transactions
with affiliates. The terms of the New Credit Facility permit
prepayments of principal and require prepayments of principal
upon the occurrence of certain events including among others,
the receipt of proceeds from the sale of assets, the receipt of
excess cash flow as defined, and the receipt of proceeds of
certain debt issues. The New Credit Facility also contains
customary events of default, including defaults based on events
of bankruptcy and insolvency, nonpayment of principal, interest
or fees when due, subject to specified grace periods, breach of
specified covenants change in control and material inaccuracy of
representations and warranties. The Company was in compliance
with its financial and non-financial covenants as of
January 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006.
|
|
Note 6.
|
Restructuring
Charges
|
In connection with the acquisition of VeriFone Inc. by the
Company on July 1, 2002, the Company assumed the liability
for a restructuring plan (fiscal 2002 restructuring plan). The
remaining accrued restructuring balance represents primarily
future facilities lease obligations, net of estimated future
sublease income, which are expected to be paid through 2007. The
payment of the restructuring costs for the International segment
was zero for the three months ended both January 31, 2007
and 2006. The Company paid restructuring costs of $182,000 and
$178,000 for the three months ended January 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively, in the North America segment. As of
January 31, 2007, the Company has a liability of $304,000
and $61,000 for the North America segment and International
segment, respectively.
Activities related to the fiscal 2002 restructuring plan are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
486
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
1,260
|
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
1,022
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
1,082
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of the assets of the GO
Software business on March 1, 2005, the Company accrued in
the purchase price allocation $313,000 of restructuring costs
related to the integration of GO Softwares Savannah
helpdesk facility with the Companys helpdesk facility in
Clearwater, Florida, of which $269,000 has been paid as of both
January 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006.
24
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company implemented a
restructuring plan that established Singapore supply chain
operations to leverage a favorable tax environment and
manufacturing operations in the Asia Pacific region (fiscal 2006
restructuring plan). The Company incurred and paid no
restructuring costs in the International segment for the three
months ended January 31, 2007. For the three months ended
January 31, 2007, the Company incurred and paid
restructuring costs of $2,000 and $7,000 in the North America
segment.
Activities related to the fiscal 2006 restructuring plan are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of 2007, the Company implemented a
restructuring plan that included reductions in workforce of
employees in the United States, China, Hong Kong, Mexico and the
Philippines with an expected cost of $292,000. The Company
incurred and paid restructuring costs of $216,000 and $147,000,
respectively, in the North America segment for the three months
ended January 31, 2007. For the three months ended
January 31, 2007, the Company incurred and paid
restructuring costs of $90,000 and $88,000, respectively, in the
International segment.
Activities related to the fiscal 2007 restructuring plan are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company completed the
acquisition of PayWare. During the quarter ended
January 31, 2007, the Company completed its restructuring
plan and accrued additional restructuring costs related to
reduction in workforce and future facilities lease obligation of
$653,000, which were included in the purchase price allocation
of PayWare. The payment of the restructuring costs for the
International segment was $2.0 million for the three months
ended January 31, 2007.
25
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Activities related to the PayWare acquisition restructuring plan
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
1,098
|
|
|
$
|
1,234
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
2,408
|
|
|
$
|
2,408
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(1,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,014
|
)
|
|
|
(2,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
1,047
|
|
|
$
|
1,047
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company completed the
acquisition of Lipman and began formulating a restructure plan
which is not complete. For those portions of the plan completed
during the quarter ended January 31, 2007, the Company
accrued into the purchase price allocation restructuring costs
related to reduction in workforce and future facilities lease
obligation of $5.5 million. The payment of the
restructuring costs for the International segment was $1.3 for
the three months ended January 31, 2007.
Activities related to the Lipman acquisition restructuring plan
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Portion
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
|
|
2,526
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
5,544
|
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
2,495
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,278
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
2,970
|
|
|
$
|
1,248
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
4,243
|
|
|
$
|
1,748
|
|
|
$
|
2,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006,
$1.7 million and zero, respectively, of the restructuring
liability was included in other current liabilities and
$2.5 million and zero, respectively, was included in other
long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
|
|
Note 7.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company leases certain real and personal property under
non-cancelable operating leases. Additionally, the Company
subleases certain real property to third parties. Future minimum
lease payments and sublease rental income under these leases as
of January 31, 2007 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Lease
|
|
|
Sublease Rental
|
|
|
Net Minimum
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Lease Payments
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2007
|
|
$
|
7,246
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
7,174
|
|
2008
|
|
|
7,959
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
7,850
|
|
2009
|
|
|
5,918
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
5,834
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,265
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5,261
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
14,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,847
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
44,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain leases require the Company to pay property taxes,
insurance and routine maintenance, and include rent escalation
clauses and options to extend the term of certain leases. Rent
expense was approximately $2.9 million and
$2.1 million for the three months ended January 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Sublease rental income was
approximately $76,000 and $71,000 for the three months ended
January 31, 2007 and 2006.
26
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Manufacturing
Agreements
The Company works on a purchase order basis with third-party
contract manufacturers with facilities in China, Singapore and
Brazil to manufacture substantially all of the Companys
inventories. The Company issues a forecast to the third-party
contract manufacturers and subsequently agrees to a build
schedule to drive component material purchases and capacity
planning. In conjunction with this, the Company issues a
combination of purchase order and written direction to drive
manufacturing activity for finished goods product. The Company
provides each manufacturer with a purchase order on a monthly
basis to cover the following months manufacturing
requirements, which constitutes a binding commitment by the
Company to purchase materials produced by the manufacturer as
specified in the purchase order. The total amount of purchase
commitments as of January 31, 2007 and October 31,
2006 was approximately $22.1 and $17.9 million,
respectively, and are generally paid within one year. Of this
amount, $1.4 million has been recorded in other current
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as
of both January 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006, because
the commitment may not have future value to the Company.
Employee
Health and Dental Costs
The Company is primarily self-insured for employee health and
dental costs and has stop-loss insurance coverage to limit
per-incident liability for health costs. The Company believes
that adequate accruals are maintained to cover the retained
liability. The accrual for self-insurance is determined based on
claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet
reported.
Litigation
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings related to
commercial, customer, and employment matters that have arisen
during the ordinary course of its business. Although there can
be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of these matters,
the Companys management has determined, based upon the
information available at the date of these financial statements,
that the expected outcome of these matters, individually or in
the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
One of the Companys Brazilian subsidiaries has been
notified of a tax assessment regarding Brazilian state value
added tax (VAT), for the periods from January 2000
to December 2001 that relates to products supplied to the
Company by a contract manufacturer. The assessment relates to an
asserted deficiency of 7.6 million Brazilian reais
(approximately $3.6 million) including interest and
penalties. The tax assessment was based on a clerical error in
which the Companys Brazilian subsidiary omitted the
required tax exemption number on its invoices. Management does
not expect that the Company will ultimately incur a material
liability in respect of this assessment, because they believe,
based in part on advice of the Companys Brazilian tax
counsel, that the Company is likely to prevail in the
proceedings relating to this assessment. On May 25, 2005,
the Company had an administrative hearing with respect to this
audit. Management expects to receive the decision of the
administrative body sometime in 2007. In the event the Company
receives an adverse ruling from the administrative body, the
Company will decide whether or not to appeal and would reexamine
the determination as to whether an accrual is necessary. It is
currently uncertain what impact this state tax examination may
have with respect to the Companys use of a corresponding
exemption to reduce the Brazilian federal VAT.
Two of the Companys Brazilian subsidiaries that were
acquired as a part of the Lipman acquisition have been notified
of tax assessments regarding Brazilian customs penalties that
relate to alleged infractions in the importation of goods. The
assessments relate to an asserted deficiency of
24.9 million Brazilian reais (approximately
$11.6 million) excluding interest and penalties. The tax
authorities allege that the structure used for the importation
of goods was simulated with the objective to hide the real
seller and buyer of the imported goods and that the simulation
was created through a fraudulent interposition of parties. The
fines with respect to one of the assessments were reduced on a
first level administrative decision on January 26, 2007.
The proceeding has been remitted to the
27
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Taxpayers Council to adjudicate the appeal of the first level
administrative decision filed by the tax authorities. The
Company has also appealed the first level administrative
decision on February 26, 2007. In this appeal, the Company
argued that the tax authorities did not have enough evidence to
determine that the import transactions were indeed fraudulent
and that, even if there were some irregularities in such
importations, they could not be deemed to be the Companys
responsibility since all the transactions were performed by the
importer of the goods. Management expects to receive the
decision of the Taxpayers Council sometime in 2007. In the event
the Company receives an adverse ruling from the administrative
body, the Company will decide whether or not to appeal and would
reexamine the determination as to whether an accrual is
necessary.
On December 11, 2006, the Company received a civil
investigative demand from the U.S. Department of Justice
regarding an investigation into its acquisition of Lipman which
requests certain documents and other information, principally
with respect to the companies integration plans and
communications prior to the completion of this acquisition.
Although the Company has commenced the process of gathering
documents in response to this request, the Company cannot
predict what actions, if any, will result from this
investigation.
|
|
Note 8.
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
The components of comprehensive income were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(984
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,794
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Unrecognized gain (loss) on
interest rate hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
marketable securities, net of tax
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(342
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments, net of tax of $1,525 and $1,068
|
|
$
|
1,665
|
|
|
$
|
1,003
|
|
Unrecognized loss on interest rate
hedges, net of tax of $41 and $29
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities, net of tax of zero and $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
$
|
1,600
|
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9.
|
Stockholders
Equity
|
Common
and Preferred Stock
The Company has authorized 100,000,000 shares of Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and
10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value
$0.01 per share. The board of directors has the authority
to issue the undesignated Preferred Stock in one or more series
and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions
thereof. The holder of each share of Common Stock has the right
to one vote. As of January 31, 2007 and October 31,
2006, there were no shares of Preferred Stock outstanding and
there were 82,440,012 and 68,148,245 shares of Common Stock
outstanding.
On November 1, 2006, the Company completed its acquisition
of Lipman. As part of the acquisition consideration, the Company
issued 13,462,474 shares of its common stock. See
Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
28
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted
Common Stock
The Company has a right to repurchase shares of Common Stock
sold to the Companys Chief Executive Officer (the
CEO) at the original sale price, $0.0333 per
share, in the event the CEO ceases to be employed by the Company
or any of its subsidiaries. This right lapses at a rate of 20%
of the original 3,910,428 shares per year. Upon the sale of
the Company, any remaining unvested shares will become vested.
At January 31, 2007, 782,085 shares of Common Stock
issued to the CEO remained subject to this repurchase right
which will lapse in July 2007.
The Company had a right to repurchase shares of Common Stock
sold to certain executives of the Company pursuant to the
Companys 2002 Securities Purchase Plan at the lesser of
the original sale price, $0.0333 per share, or the fair
value on the date of separation in the event that the executive
ceases to be employed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
This right lapses at a rate of 20% of the original
1,929,145 shares per year. Upon the sale of the Company,
all remaining unvested shares will become vested. At
January 31, 2007, 218,985 shares of Common Stock
remained subject to this repurchase right which will lapse in
July 2007.
Stock
Option Plans
As of January 31, 2007, the Company had a total of
8,260,157 stock options outstanding with a weighted average
exercise price of $22.21 per share. The number of shares
that remained available for future grants was 4,055,105 as of
January 31, 2007.
New
Founders Stock Option Plan
On April 30, 2003, the Company adopted the New
Founders Stock Option Plan (the New Founders
Plan) for executives and employees of the Company. A total
of 1,500,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock were
reserved for issuance under the New Founders Plan. The
Company will no longer grant options under the New
Founders Plan and will retire any options cancelled
hereafter. Option awards under the New Founders Plan were
generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market
price of the Companys stock on the date of grant. Those
option awards generally vest in equal annual amounts over a
period of five years from the date of grant and have a maximum
term of 10 years.
The following table summarizes option activity under the New
Founders Plan during the three months ended
January 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Under
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at November 1, 2006
|
|
|
898,062
|
|
|
$
|
4.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(98,367
|
)
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(2,330
|
)
|
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
|
797,365
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
7.24
|
|
|
$
|
28,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
635,500
|
|
|
$
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
7.24
|
|
|
$
|
22,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 31,
2007
|
|
|
365,575
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
7.30
|
|
|
$
|
13,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The options expected to vest are the result of applying the
pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to total outstanding
options.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three
months ended January 31, 2007 was $2.4 million.
29
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of January 31, 2007, pursuant to SFAS 123(R) there
was $985,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested shared based compensation arrangements granted under
the New Founders Plan. The cost is expected to be
recognized over a remaining weighted average period of years.
The total fair value of shares vested during the three months
ended January 31, 2007 was $117,000.
Outside
Directors Stock Option Plan
In January 2005, the Company adopted the Outside Directors
Stock Option Plan (the Directors Plan) for
members of the Board of Directors of the Company who are not
employees of the Company or representatives of major
stockholders of the Company. A total of 225,000 shares of
the Companys Common Stock had been reserved for issuance
under the Directors Plan. The Company will no longer grant
options under Directors Plan and will retire any options
cancelled hereafter. Option grants for members of the Board of
Directors of the Company who are not employees of the Company or
representatives of major stockholders of the Company will be
covered under 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
The following table summarizes option activity under the
Directors Plan during the three months ended
January 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Under
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at November 1, 2006
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
$
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
$
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 31,
2007
|
|
|
28,125
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
$
|
843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The options expected to vest are the result of applying the
pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to total outstanding
options.
As of January 31, 2007, pursuant to SFAS 123(R) there
was $272,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested shared-based compensation arrangements granted under
the Directors Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized
over a remaining weighted average period of years. The total
fair value of shares vested during the three months ended
January 31, 2007 was $35,000.
2005
Equity Incentive Option Plan
On April 29, 2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Equity
Incentive Option Plan (the EIP Plan) for executives
and employees of the Company and other individuals who perform
services to the Company. A total of 3,100,000 shares of the
Companys Common Stock have been reserved for issuance
under the EIP Plan. The Company will no longer grant options
under the EIP Plan and will retire any options cancelled
hereafter. Option awards were generally granted with an exercise
price equal to the market price of the Companys stock at
the date of grant. Those options generally vest over a period of
four years from the date of grant and have a maximum term of
7 years.
30
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes option activity under the EIP
Plan during the three months ended January 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Under
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at November 1, 2006
|
|
|
1,878,801
|
|
|
$
|
12.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(151,645
|
)
|
|
|
11.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(20,969
|
)
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,706,187
|
|
|
|
12.21
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
|
|
$
|
47,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,477,558
|
|
|
$
|
12.21
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
|
|
$
|
41,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 31,
2007
|
|
|
414,279
|
|
|
$
|
12.27
|
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
|
$
|
11,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The options expected to vest are the result of applying the
pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to total outstanding
options.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three
months ended January 31, 2007 was $1.4 million.
As of January 31, 2007, pursuant to SFAS 123(R) there
was $7,817,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted
under the EIP Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a
remaining weighted average period of years. The total fair value
of shares vested during the three months ended January 31,
2007 was $820,000.
2006
Equity Incentive Plan
On March 22, 2006, the stockholders of VeriFone approved
the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan) for
officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company. A
total of 9,000,000 shares of the Companys Common
Stock have been reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan.
Awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the
market price of the Companys Common Stock at the date of
grant. Those awards generally vest over a period of four years
from the date of grant and have a maximum term of seven years.
Any shares granted as stock options and stock appreciation
rights shall be counted as one share for every share granted.
Any shares granted as awards other than stock options or stock
appreciation rights shall be counted as 1.75 shares for
every share granted.
31
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes option activity under the 2006
Plan during the three months ended January 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at November 1, 2006
|
|
|
2,367,795
|
|
|
$
|
29.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
741,000
|
|
|
|
34.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(58,900
|
)
|
|
|
30.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
|
3,049,895
|
|
|
|
30.35
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
$
|
29,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,830,305
|
|
|
$
|
30.35
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
$
|
27,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The options expected to vest are the result of applying the
pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to total outstanding
options.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted
during the three months ended January 31, 2007 was
$10.32 per share.
As of January 31, 2007, pursuant to SFAS 123(R) there
was $26,413,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to non-vested shared based compensation arrangements granted
under the 2006 Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over
the remaining weighted average period of 3.6 years.
In March 2006, September 2006 and January 2007, the Company
issued 90,000, 80,000 and 14,000 restricted stock units (RSU) to
its executive officers and key employees with zero value
exercise price. Twenty-five percent of these awards shall vest
one year from the date of grant and 1/16th vest quarterly
thereafter. The fair value of the restricted stock units granted
is the stock price on March 22, 2006, September 12,
2006 and January 3, 2007 of $28.86, $27.50 and $35.45,
respectively. As of January 31, 2007, 184,000 restricted
stock units are vested or are expected to vest, with an
aggregate intrinsic value of $6.4 million. Pursuant to
SFAS 123(R), there was $4.4 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted
stock units. The cost is expected to be recognized over the
remaining weighted average period of 3.6 years.
In January 2007, the Company issued 900,000 RSUs to the CEO
which may vest over a four year period based upon growth in the
Companys net income as adjusted per share and its share
price. The RSUs are allocated between performance
units related to achievement of net income as adjusted
targets, and market units related to achievement of
net income as adjusted targets and the performance of the
Companys stock. The performance RSUs are earned in three
annual tranches of 200,000 each in the event that the Company
meets or exceeds 20% annual increases in net income per share,
as adjusted, for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009. In addition,
in each of the three years, the CEO may earn a further 100,000
RSUs if the Company achieves both the targeted improvement in
net income as adjusted per share results and there is a
corresponding 20% improvement in the Companys share price.
Each years RSUs will not vest until the end of the fiscal
year following the year in which the net income per share, as
adjusted, target is met.
The 2007 performance RSUs of 200,000 have a fair value of
$35.75 per share. The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation
model to calculate the $15.74 per unit of fair value of the
100,000 market RSUs. Pursuant to SFAS 123(R), there was
$8.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested restricted stock units. The cost is
expected to be recognized over the remaining vesting period of
21 months. The compensation for the 2007 RSUs will be
recognized over the period from January 2007 through October
2008. Since the financial targets for the 2008 and 2009 tranches
have not yet been determined, no measurement date has occurred.
When all the
32
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
factors for measurements are determined, the Company will value
the 2007 and 2008 tranches, respectively. Since these shares are
contingently issuable, they are excluded from the earnings per
share calculation.
Lipman
Plans
As part of the acquisition of Lipman on November 1, 2006,
VeriFone assumed all of Lipmans outstanding options. The
following table summarizes option activity under the Lipman
Electronic Engineering, Ltd. Plans (Lipman Plans) during the
three months ended January 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
Options assumed on acquisition of
Lipman on November 1, 2006
|
|
|
3,372,527
|
|
|
$
|
24.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(564,281
|
)
|
|
$
|
20.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(176,536
|
)
|
|
$
|
27.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,631,710
|
|
|
$
|
25.03
|
|
|
|
6.20
|
|
|
$
|
39,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,160,634
|
|
|
$
|
25.03
|
|
|
|
6.20
|
|
|
$
|
30,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 31,
2007
|
|
|
357,421
|
|
|
$
|
14.94
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
$
|
8,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The options expected to vest are the result of applying the
pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to total outstanding
options.
The Company will no longer grant options under the Lipman Plans.
As of January 31, 2007, pursuant to SFAS 123(R) there
was $17,813,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to non-vested shared based compensation arrangements granted
under the Lipman Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized
over remaining weighted average period of 2.5 years.
The total cash received from employees as a result of employee
stock option exercises under all plans for the three months
ended January 31, 2007 was approximately
$13.9 million. In connection with these exercises, the tax
benefits realized by the Company and credited to equity for the
three months ended January 31, 2007 were $2.4 million.
The Company estimates the grant-date fair value of stock options
using a Black-Scholes valuation model, consistent with the
provisions of SFAS 123(R) and SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment.
Expected volatility of the stock is based on the
Companys peer group in the industry in which it does
business because the Company does not have sufficient historical
volatility data for its own stock. The expected term of options
granted is estimated by the Company considering vesting periods
and historical trends within the Companys equity plans and
represents the period of time that options granted are expected
to be outstanding. The risk-free rate is based on the
U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term
equal to the expected term of the options used in the
Black-Scholes valuation model. Estimates of fair value are not
intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately
realized by employees who receive equity awards, and subsequent
events are not indicative of the reasonableness of the original
estimates of fair value made by the Company under
SFAS 123(R).
33
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of each stock option and stock purchase right was
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expected term of the options
|
|
|
2.5 years
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Expected dividend rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
The following table presents the stock compensation expense
recognized in accordance with SFAS 123(R) during the three
months ended January 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of net revenues
|
|
$
|
771
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,064
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,475
|
|
|
$
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10.
|
Segment
and Geographic Information
|
Segment
Information
The Company is primarily structured in a geographic manner. The
Companys Chief Executive Officer has been identified as
the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) as defined
by SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information. The CODM
reviews consolidated financial information on revenues and gross
profit percentage for System Solutions and Services. The CODM
also reviews operating expenses, certain of which are allocated
to the Companys two segments described below.
The Company operates in two business segments: 1) North
America and 2) International. The Company defines North
America as the United States and Canada, and International as
the countries in which it makes sales outside the United States
and Canada.
Net revenues and operating income of each business segment
reflect net revenues generated within the segment, standard cost
of System Solutions net revenues, actual cost of Services net
revenues and expenses that directly benefit only that segment.
Corporate revenues and operating income reflect amortization of
intangible assets, stock-based compensation, in-process research
and development expense, and amortization of the
step-up in
the fair value of inventories, equipment and improvements and
deferred revenue resulting from acquisitions. Corporate income
also reflects the difference between the actual and standard
cost of System Solutions net revenues and shared operating costs
that benefit both segments, predominately research and
development expenses and centralized supply chain management.
34
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth net revenues and operating income
for the Companys segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
$
|
129,070
|
|
|
$
|
57,657
|
|
North America
|
|
|
89,070
|
|
|
|
77,175
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(1,514
|
)
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
216,626
|
|
|
$
|
134,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
$
|
37,767
|
|
|
$
|
14,167
|
|
North America
|
|
|
38,554
|
|
|
|
30,503
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(64,533
|
)
|
|
|
(21,533
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$
|
11,788
|
|
|
$
|
23,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys long-lived assets which consist primarily of
property, plant and equipment, net by segment were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
International
|
|
$
|
21,190
|
|
|
$
|
3,277
|
|
North America
|
|
|
15,761
|
|
|
|
6,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,951
|
|
|
$
|
9,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys goodwill by segment was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
International
|
|
$
|
494,585
|
|
|
$
|
19,102
|
|
North America
|
|
|
40,118
|
|
|
|
33,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
534,703
|
|
|
$
|
52,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys total assets by segment were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
$
|
825,572
|
|
|
$
|
125,681
|
|
North America
|
|
|
482,257
|
|
|
|
327,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,307,829
|
|
|
$
|
452,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys depreciation and amortization expense by
segment were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
International
|
|
$
|
1,373
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
North America
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,073
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic
Information
The net revenues by geographic area were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
$
|
71,408
|
|
|
$
|
23,049
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
40,671
|
|
|
|
23,916
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
16,991
|
|
|
|
10,692
|
|
United States
|
|
|
79,264
|
|
|
|
75,037
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
8,292
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
216,626
|
|
|
$
|
134,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues are allocated to the geographic areas based on the
shipping destination of customer orders. Corporate revenues are
included in the United States geographic area revenues.
The Companys long-lived assets exclusive of inter-company
accounts were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
$
|
19,860
|
|
|
$
|
2,191
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
United States
|
|
|
15,761
|
|
|
|
6,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,951
|
|
|
$
|
9,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11.
|
Related-Party
Transactions
|
In June 2004, the Company paid a placement fee of $2,920,000 to
GTCR Golder Rauner, L.L.C., the manager of equity funds that are
shareholders of the Company, for services related to the Credit
Facility acquired from Banc of America Securities and Credit
Suisse First Boston. The debt issuance costs were amortized over
the term of the related debt. The Company recorded amortization
of debt issuance costs related to these costs of $65,000 for the
three months ended January 31, 2006, which is included in
interest expense, net in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. On October 31, 2006, the Company
entered into a new secured credit facility with a syndicate of
financial institutions, led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and
Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. The proceeds were used to repay the
outstanding amounts due from the existing secured credit
facility, pay the transaction costs and fund the cash
consideration in connection with the merger with Lipman on
November 1, 2006. The Company wrote off the remaining
balance of unamortized debt issuance cost of the credit facility
acquired from
36
VERIFONE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Banc of America Securities and Credit Suisse First Boston in the
amount of $6.4 million in October 2006 of which
$1.6 million relates to the placement fee with GTCR Golden
Rauner, L.L.C.
For the three months ended January 31, 2007 and 2006, the
Company recorded sales of $888,000 and zero, respectively, from
affiliates of related parties which are included in System
Solutions net revenues in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
The Companys effective tax rate was 134.3% for the three
months ended January 31, 2007 as compared to 33.5% for the
three months ended January 31, 2006. The effective tax rate
was higher than the expected statutory rate of 35% in the period
ended January 31, 2007 primarily due to the impact of an
increase in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
related to the write off of in-process research and development
costs in the quarter ended January 31, 2007. The tax rate
is also higher due to the anticipated increase in the deferred
tax asset valuation allowance for the year attributable to the
amortization of intangibles resulting from the Lipman
acquisition. The increase in the valuation allowance for the
quarter exceeded pre-tax income for the quarter.
|
|
Note 13.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
The Company maintains a defined contribution 401(k) plan that
allows eligible employees to contribute up to 60% of their
pretax salary up to the maximum allowed under Internal Revenue
Service regulations. Discretionary employer matching
contributions of $0.5 million were made to the plan during
both three month periods ended January 31, 2007 and
January 31, 2006.
|
|
Note 14.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
In February 2007 the Company made an additional investment of
$4.0 million in VeriFone Transportation Systems, Inc.
(VTS) to increase its ownership percentage from
19.9% to 51.0%.
37
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
This section and other parts of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by words such as anticipates,
expects, believes, plans,
predicts, and similar terms. Such forward-looking
statements are based on current expectations, estimates and
projections about our industry, managements beliefs and
assumptions made by management. Forward-looking statements are
not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may
differ significantly from the results discussed in the
forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such
differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in
Part II, Item 1A Risk Factors below and in
Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended October 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on
December 18, 2006. The following discussion should be read
in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial
statements and related notes included in our 2006 Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
Unless required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation to
update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as
result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We are a global leader in secure electronic payment solutions.
We provide expertise, solutions and services that add value to
the point of sale with merchant-operated, consumer-facing and
self-service payment systems for the financial, retail,
hospitality, petroleum, government and healthcare vertical
markets. Since 1981, we have designed and marketed system
solutions that facilitate the long-term shift toward electronic
payment transactions and away from cash and checks. We believe
that we have the leading electronic payment solutions brands
and, supported by our recent acquisition of Lipman Electronic
Engineering Ltd, (Lipman), we are one of the largest
providers of electronic payment systems worldwide in terms of
revenues, research and development spending and profitability.
Our System Solutions consist of point of sale electronic payment
devices that run our proprietary and third party operating
systems, security and encryption software and certified payment
software as well as third party, value-added applications. Our
System Solutions are able to process a wide range of payment
types including signature and PIN-based debit cards, credit
cards, contactless / radio frequency identification, or RFID,
cards and tokens, smart cards, pre-paid gift and other
stored-value cards, electronic bill payment, check authorization
and conversion, signature capture and electronic benefits
transfer, or EBT. Our proprietary architecture was the first to
enable multiple value-added applications, such as gift card and
loyalty card programs, healthcare insurance eligibility and time
and attendance tracking, to reside on the same system without
requiring recertification when new applications are added to the
system. We are an industry leader in multi-application payment
system deployments and we believe we have the largest selection
of certified value-add applications.
We design our System Solutions to meet the demanding
requirements of our direct and indirect customers. Our
electronic payment systems are available in several distinctive
modular configurations, offering our customers flexibility to
support a variety of connectivity options, including wireline
and wireless internet protocol, or IP, technologies. We also
offer our customers support for installed systems, consulting
and project management services for system deployment and
customization of integrated software solutions.
Our customers are primarily global financial institutions,
payment processors, petroleum companies, large retailers,
government organizations and healthcare companies, as well as
independent sales organizations, or ISOs. The functionality of
our System Solutions includes transaction security,
connectivity, compliance with certification standards and the
flexibility to execute a variety of payment and non-payment
applications on a single system solution.
38
Results
of Operations
Net
Revenues
We generate net revenues through the sale of our electronic
payment systems and solutions that enable electronic payments,
which we identify as System Solutions, and to a lesser extent,
warranty and support services and customer specific application
development, which we identify as Services.
Net revenues, which include System Solutions and Services, are
summarized in the following table (in thousands, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
in Dollars
|
|
|
in Percent
|
|
|
Systems Solutions
|
|
$
|
189,229
|
|
|
$
|
118,685
|
|
|
$
|
70,544
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
Services
|
|
|
27,397
|
|
|
|
15,945
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
216,626
|
|
|
$
|
134,630
|
|
|
$
|
81,996
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System
Solutions
System Solutions net revenues increased $70.5 million, or
59%, to $189.2 million in the quarter ended
January 31, 2007, from $118.7 million in the quarter
ended January 31, 2006. System Solutions net revenues
comprised 87% of total net revenues in the quarter ended
January 31, 2007, as compared to 88% in the quarter ended
January 31, 2006.
International System Solutions net revenues for the quarter
ended January 31, 2007 increased $58.5 million, or
105% to $114.1 million. Our International business was
stronger as a result of both the acquisition of Lipman and
organic growth. The increase was largely attributable to growth
across emerging economies, in particular the countries of
Brazil, China and Turkey, and to a lesser extent Western Europe.
Factors driving the emerging economy increases were the addition
of the Nurit product line, acquired in the Lipman acquisition,
and continued desire of these countries to modernize their
infrastructure and improve collection of VAT. In Western Europe,
acquisition related sales in Spain, Italy, and the UK was the
primary reason for growth. We expect that the proportion of
International System Solutions net revenues, relative to North
America System Solutions net revenues, will increase at a higher
growth rate for at least the next year. In addition, we may
experience periodic variations in sales to our International
markets.
North America System Solutions net revenues for the quarter
ended January 31, 2007 increased $12.6 million, or
20%, to $75.7 million. This increase was primarily
attributable to the Lipman acquisition which drove higher
wireless sales associated with the Nurit product line as well as
continued market share gains in Canada, strength in our
multi-lane
retail business, and the ongoing replacement of the installed
base with System Solutions that have IP communication and
PIN-based debit capabilities. Sales of solutions which address
the lower priced single application financial system market
declined slightly as merchant activations for both ISOs and US
processors declined.
Services
Services net revenues increased $11.5 million, or 72%, to
$27.4 million in the quarter ended January 31, 2007
from $15.9 million in the quarter ended January 31,
2006. This growth occurred entirely in International, while
North America had a slight decline. International growth was
significant as maintenance revenues and deployment revenues in
Europe and Brazil associated with the acquisition of Lipman were
included in the current year quarter. The North America decline
was due to lower installation volume with our quick service
restaurant customers.
39
Gross
Profit
The following table shows the gross profit for System Solutions
and Services (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Gross Profit Percentage
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Systems Solutions
|
|
$
|
66,580
|
|
|
$
|
51,570
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
|
|
43.5
|
%
|
Services
|
|
|
14,800
|
|
|
|
8,032
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
50.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
81,380
|
|
|
$
|
59,602
|
|
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on System Solutions, including amortization of
purchased core and developed technology assets, increased
$15.0 million, or 29.1%, to $66.6 million in the
quarter ended January 31, 2007, from $51.6 million in
the quarter ended January 31, 2006. Gross profit on System
Solutions represented 35.2% of System Solutions net revenues in
the quarter ended January 31, 2007, down from 43.5% in the
quarter ended January 31, 2006. Amortization of purchased
core and developed technology assets and
step-up in
inventory fair value was 10.5% of Systems Solutions net revenues
in the quarter ended January 31, 2007 compared to 1.3% in
the quarter ended January 31, 2006, as a result of the
Lipman acquisition. Gross profit percentage decreased due to the
higher proportion of International net revenues, which typically
carry a lower margin than North American net revenues. This was
more than offset, however, by favorable margin performance in
International, Corporate costs and to a lesser extent North
America. International gross profit percentage increased
primarily due to a higher proportion of wireless sales, which
typically carry a higher margin than landline sales and the
non-recurrence of a large Indian low-margin sale recognized in
the quarter ended January 31, 2006. Corporate costs are
comprised of purchase price variances relating to raw material
components, inventory obsolescence, scrap, rework, specific
warranty provisions, non-standard freight and
over-and-under
absorption of materials management and supply chain engineering
overhead. Since these costs are generally incurred on a company
wide basis, it is impractical to allocate them to either North
America or International segments. Corporate cost improvements
resulted from reductions in obsolescence charges and economies
of scale in labor and facilities. North America gross profit
percentage increased primarily due to higher wireless net
revenues.
Gross profit on Services increased $6.8 million, or 84.3%
to $14.8 million in the quarter ended January 31,
2007, from $8.0 million in the quarter ended
January 31, 2006. Gross profit on Services represented
54.0% of Services net revenues in the quarter ended
January 31, 2007, as compared to 50.4% in the quarter ended
January 31, 2006. This improvement was due to the inclusion
of service revenues related to the Lipman acquisition which
earned a gross margin percent above our historical averages.
We expect the gross profit percentages, both System Solutions
and Services, of our International segment to continue to be
lower than the comparable gross profit percentages of our North
America segment.
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development (R&D) expenses are
summarized in the following table (in thousands, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
in Dollars
|
|
|
in Percent
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
16,806
|
|
|
$
|
11,407
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
Percentage of net
revenues
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R&D expenses in the quarter ended January 31, 2007,
increased compared to the quarter ended January 31, 2006,
primarily due to $3.6 million of expenses incurred at
Lipman entities, $1.1 million due to stock-based
compensation and $0.7 million of expenses incurred at
Payware entities.
40
We expect R&D expenses over the next several quarters to
decline, as a percent of sales, from the current 7.8% level to
between 7.0% and 7.5% and then stabilize. The decline is
anticipated since Lipman R&D expenses have generally been
lower than Verifone R&D expenses and we expect the two
companies R&D operations to gain efficiencies.
Sales
and Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing expenses are summarized in the following
table (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
in Dollars
|
|
|
in Percent
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
22,523
|
|
|
$
|
14,201
|
|
|
$
|
8,322
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
Percentage of net
revenues
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses increased for the quarter ended
January 31, 2007, compared to the quarter ended
January 31, 2006 due primarily to $5.1 million of
expenses incurred at Lipman entities and $0.7 million of
expenses incurred at Payware entities. In addition,
$1.5 million of increased expenses was due to stock-based
compensation.
We expect sales and marketing expenses to continue to decline
slightly as a percentage of net revenues, for the foreseeable
future, as over time the higher revenues of the combined
companies are expected to generate economies of scale in our
distribution channels.
General
and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses are summarized in the
following table (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
in Dollars
|
|
|
in Percent
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
18,405
|
|
|
$
|
9,698
|
|
|
$
|
8,707
|
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
Percentage of net
revenues
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses in the quarter ended
January 31, 2007 increased, compared with the quarter ended
January 31, 2006, primarily due to $4.1 million of
increased stock-based compensation, $2.7 million of
expenses incurred at Lipman entities and $0.6 million of
expenses incurred at Payware entities. Integration expenses
relating to the acquisition of Lipman and restructuring charges
in VeriFone entities of $0.8 million were partially offset
by a reduction in executive bonus costs of $0.5 million.
For the next several quarters, we expect general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues to
remain approximately flat as a percentage of net revenues due to
expenses associated with the completion of the integration of
Lipman and the planned upgrade of our Enterprise Resource
Planning system.
IPR&D
We recognized in-process research and development expense of
$6.5 million during the quarter ended January 31, 2007
in connection with our Lipman acquisition. The products
considered to be in-process research and were in our
consumer-activated and countertop communication modules which
have subsequently reached technological feasibility.
Consumer-activated systems. We had two
projects involving consumer-activated systems in process. The
first involved a new category of PIN pad devices with debit,
credit and smart card payment capabilities with interfaces to
countertop systems and ECRs. The project was 75% complete at
October 31, 2006. The estimated cost of completion at
October 31, 2006 was $0.3 million and the expected
completion date was December, 2006. The project was completed
during the quarter ended January 31, 2007 for approximately
the expected remaining cost.
The second project was a new product family of
consumer-activated payment systems for
multi-lane
retailers. New features include a faster processor, more memory,
modular design, a signature capture option, Ethernet/USB option
and smart card option. The project was completed at acquisition
date and is in the pilot stage. The estimated
41
cost of completion at October 31, 2006 was less than
$0.1 million and was completed during the quarter ended
January 31, 2007.
Countertop communication modules. This project
was developing new modem, Ethernet and ISDN communication
modules for countertop system solutions, consisting of customer
firmware and circuit board design intended to achieve desired
functions, operating system drivers, library and application
modifications. The project was 50% complete at October 31,
2006. The estimated cost of completion at the acquisition date
was $0.2 million and the expected completion date was
December 2006. The project was completed during the quarter
ended January 31, 2007 for the approximately expected
remaining cost.
We engaged a third-party valuation firm to assist management in
determining the fair value of these in-process research and
development projects. We prepared cash flow forecasts for the
acquired projects and those forecasts were used by the valuation
firm to develop a discounted cash flow model. The discount rate
assigned to in-process technologies was 19% with consideration
give to the risk associated with these in-process projects.
Amortization
of Purchased Intangible Assets
Amortization of purchased intangible assets increased
$4.1 million to $5.3 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2007 compared with $1.2 million in the first quarter
of fiscal 2006. The increase for the period was due to
additional purchased intangible assets relating to the
acquisition of Lipman, which was completed on November 1,
2006.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense of $9.8 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2007 increased from $3.3 million in the first
quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase in the three-month period
was primarily attributable to the increase of our Term B Loan
due to the completion of our acquisition of Lipman. This loan
facility carries a spread over LIBOR of 175 basis points.
Assuming no changes in LIBOR, this implies a quarterly gross
interest expense of approximately $9.5 million which
includes a non-cash debt fee amortization charge of $300,000.
Interest
Income
Interest income of $972,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2007
increased from $687,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The
increase in the three-month periods was attributable to higher
cash balances in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 relative to
the same period in fiscal 2006.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net in the first quarter of fiscal 2007
was an expense of $137,000 resulting primarily from foreign
currency losses of $81,000 resulting from the net effects of
currency conversion transactions, currency translation, and
settlements of currency derivative transactions. Other income,
net in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was $201,000 resulting
primarily from a refund of $288,000 associated with an Indian
customs appeal resolution. This was partially offset by foreign
currency transaction losses of $20,000 and foreign currency
contract losses of $76,000 related to fluctuations in the value
of the US dollar as compared to foreign currency.
Provision
for Income Tax
We recorded a provision for income taxes of $3.9 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to an income tax
expense of $7.0 million for the comparable period in fiscal
2006. For the first quarter of fiscal 2007 our effective tax
rate was 134.3% as compared to 33.5% for the first quarter of
2006. The increase in the tax rate is primarily attributable to
an increase in our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
related to the write-off of in-process research and development
costs in the quarter ended January 31, 2007 and to expected
increases in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance for the
year attributable to the amortization of intangibles resulting
from the Lipman acquisition.
As of January 31, 2007, we have recorded $35.1 million
of deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance, the
realization of which is dependent on us generating sufficient
U.S. and certain foreign taxable income. Although realization is
not assured, our management believes that it is more likely than
not that these deferred tax assets will
42
be realized. The amount of deferred tax assets considered
realizable may increase or decrease in subsequent quarters when
we reevaluate the underlying basis for our estimates of future
domestic and certain foreign taxable income.
Segment
Information
The following table reconciles segmented net revenues and
operating income to totals for the three months ended
January 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands). Corporate net
revenues and operating income (loss) reflect amortization of
purchased intangible assets, stock-based compensation,
in-process research and development expense, and amortization of
step ups in the fair value of inventories, property, plant and
equipment and deferred net revenues resulting from acquisitions.
Corporate income (loss) also reflects the difference between the
actual and standard cost of System Solutions net revenues and
shared operating costs that benefit both segments, predominately
research and development expenses and supply chain management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
in Dollars
|
|
|
in Percent
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
$
|
129,070
|
|
|
$
|
57,657
|
|
|
$
|
71,413
|
|
|
|
124
|
%
|
North America
|
|
|
89,070
|
|
|
|
77,175
|
|
|
|
11,895
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(1,514
|
)
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
(1,312
|
)
|
|
|
650
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
216,626
|
|
|
$
|
134,630
|
|
|
$
|
81,996
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
$
|
37,767
|
|
|
$
|
14,167
|
|
|
$
|
23,600
|
|
|
|
167
|
%
|
North America
|
|
|
38,554
|
|
|
|
30,503
|
|
|
|
8,051
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(64,533
|
)
|
|
|
(21,533
|
)
|
|
|
(43,000
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$
|
11,788
|
|
|
$
|
23,137
|
|
|
$
|
(11,349
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues growth in International for the quarter ended
January 31, 2007 as compared to the quarter ended
January 31, 2006 was primarily driven by an increase of
approximately $58.5 million in System Solutions and
$12.9 million in Services net revenues. See Results
of Operations Net Revenues.
Net revenues growth in North America for the quarter ended
January 31, 2007 as compared to the quarter ended
January 31, 2006 was primarily driven by an increase of
approximately $12.6 million in System Solutions partially
offset by a decline of $0.7 million in Services net
revenues. See Results of Operations Net
Revenues.
The increase in International operating income for the quarter
ended January 31, 2007 compared to the quarter ended
January 31, 2006 was mainly due to increased net revenues
as a result of both the acquisition of Lipman and organic
growth, a higher gross profit percentage as a result of a shift
towards higher margin wireless solutions and the non-recurrence
of a large Indian low-margin sale recognized in the quarter
ended January 31, 2006, partially offset by higher
operating expenses.
The increase in operating income for North America for the
quarter ended January 31, 2007 as compared to the quarter
ended January 31, 2006 was mainly due to higher net
revenues and an increasing gross profit percentage which was
partially offset by slightly declining service revenues and
gross profit percentage and higher operating expenses. In
addition, North America research and development expenses for
the quarter ended January 31, 2006 included
$2.3 million for projects which have since been broadened
in scope and will benefit customers outside the North America
segment. As a result, these projects for the quarter ended
January 31, 2007 are charged to the corporate expenses.
The decrease in Corporate operating income for the quarter ended
January 31, 2007 was primarily due to higher non-cash
acquisition related charges including increases of
$12.2 million of amortization of purchased intangible
assets, $10.3 million of amortization of step-up in
inventory on acquisition, $6.5 million of in-process
research and development charges and $1.3 million of
amortization of step-down in deferred revenue on
43
acquisition. In addition, stock compensation increased by
$6.6 million and approximately $2.3 million of
engineering expenses were incurred as projects which previously
benefited North America in the quarter ended January 31,
2006 were broadened in scope, managed by the Corporate
engineering function and charged to the Corporate segment in the
quarter ended January 31, 2007.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our primary liquidity and capital resource needs are to service
our debt, finance working capital, and to make capital
expenditures and investments. At January 31, 2007, our
primary sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents of
$161.9 million and our $40 million unused revolving
credit facility.
Cash flow from operations before changes in working capital
amounted to $30.7 million while net income was a loss of
$1.0 million. This loss was caused by non-cash charges of
$31.6 million consisting of acquisition related charges of
$21.4 million, stock-based compensation expense of
$7.5 million and depreciation and amortization of property,
plant and equipment, as well as capitalized software and debt
issuance cost totaling $2.7 million.
Cash flow from operations due to changes in working capital
netted to an inflow of $1.0 million. The main drivers are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
A reduction in inventory of $20.9 million. This reduction
occurred primarily because the beginning balance of inventory
for the period was unusually high because we increased inventory
for our initial stocking of inventory for new product releases
and as a result of balancing our inventory position to meet the
demand changes triggered by the acquisition of Lipman;
|
|
|
|
A reduction in accounts payable of $10.7 million due to the
reduction of inventory levels;
|
|
|
|
An increase in deferred revenue of $6.6 million due to an
increase in deferred service such as customer support and
installations;
|
|
|
|
A decrease in accounts receivable of $4.6 million due to
improved collection efforts;
|
|
|
|
A decrease in accrued compensation of $4.1 million as
fiscal year-end bonuses relating to the prior year were paid
during this quarter;
|
|
|
|
A decrease in other assets of $4.7 million offset primarily
by an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of
$3.2 million; and
|
|
|
|
An increase in tax-related balances including deferred tax
liabilities of $2.7 million, tax benefits from stock-based
compensation of $2.4 million, and income taxes payable of
$2.0 million.
|
Investing activities used cash of $277.8 million, primarily
due to the acquisition of Lipman, net of cash and cash
equivalents acquired, of $270.0 million. Additional uses
included the purchases of property, plant and equipment totaling
$7.0 million.
Financing activities primarily consisted of proceeds from
long-term debt (net of costs) of $305.0 million which were
used to fund the Lipman acquisition, proceeds of exercises of
stock options and other of $13.9 million, and the tax
benefit derived from stock-based compensation of
$2.4 million.
We believe that we have the financial resources to meet our
business requirements for the next twelve months, including
capital expenditures, working capital requirements and future
strategic investments, and to comply with our financial
covenants.
44
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
January 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Term B loan (including interest)
|
|
$
|
742,074
|
|
|
$
|
46,505
|
|
|
$
|
80,141
|
|
|
$
|
78,712
|
|
|
$
|
536,716
|
|
Capital lease obligation
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
44,578
|
|
|
|
9,289
|
|
|
|
12,946
|
|
|
|
9,017
|
|
|
|
13,326
|
|
Minimum purchase obligations
|
|
|
22,109
|
|
|
|
22,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
808,853
|
|
|
$
|
77,953
|
|
|
$
|
93,129
|
|
|
$
|
87,729
|
|
|
$
|
550,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, (EBITDA,
as adjusted)
We define earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, or EBITDA, as adjusted, as the sum of (1) net
income (excluding extraordinary items of gain or loss and any
gain or loss from discontinued operations), (2) interest
expense, (3) income taxes, (4) depreciation,
amortization, goodwill impairment and other non-recurring
charges, (5) non-cash charges, including non-cash
stock-based compensation expense and purchase accounting items
and (6) acquisition related charges and restructuring
costs. EBITDA, as adjusted, is a primary component of the
financial covenants to which we are subject under our credit
agreement. If we fail to maintain required levels of EBITDA, as
adjusted, we could have a default under our credit agreement,
potentially resulting in an acceleration of all of our
outstanding indebtedness. In addition, our management uses
EBITDA, as adjusted, as a primary measure to review and assess
our operating performance and to compare our current results
with those for prior periods as well as with the results of
other companies in our industry. These competitors may, due to
differences in capital structure and investment history, have
interest, tax, depreciation, amortization and other non-cash
expenses that differ significantly from ours. The term EBITDA,
as adjusted, is not defined under generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP, and EBITDA, as adjusted, is not a measure
of operating income, operating performance or liquidity
presented in accordance with GAAP. When assessing our operating
performance, you should not consider these data in isolation or
as a substitute for our net income calculated in accordance with
GAAP. Our EBITDA, as adjusted, has limitations as an analytical
tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a
substitute for net income or other consolidated income statement
data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Some of these limitations
are:
|
|
|
|
|
it does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements
for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
it does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our
working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
it does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the
cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal
payments, on our debt;
|
|
|
|
|
|
it does not reflect income taxes or the cash requirements for
any tax payments;
|
|
|
|
although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the
assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be
replaced in the future, and EBITDA, as adjusted, does not
reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;
|
|
|
|
restructuring and impairment charges, as well as losses from
discontinued operations, reflect costs associated with strategic
decisions about resource allocations made in prior periods; we
may incur similar charges and losses in the future; and
|
|
|
|
other companies may calculate EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted,
differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative
measure.
|
45
A reconciliation of net income, the most directly comparable
U.S. GAAP measure, to EBITDA, as adjusted, for the three
months ended January 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(984
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,794
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
6,952
|
|
Interest expense excluding
acquisition charges
|
|
|
9,477
|
|
|
|
3,279
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization of
property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Amortization of capitalized
software
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
Amortization of purchased
intangible assets
|
|
|
14,934
|
|
|
|
2,752
|
|
Amortization of step-down in
deferred revenue on acquisition
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Amortization of
step-up in
inventory on acquisition
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
6,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
7,475
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
Acquisition related charges and
restructuring costs
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA as adjusted
|
|
$
|
55,569
|
|
|
$
|
28,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Our only off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in
Item 303(a) (4) (ii) of the SECs
Regulation S-K,
consist of interest rate cap agreements and forward foreign
currency exchange agreements described under Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. See
Item 3.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections a replacement of APB Opinion
No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3
(SFAS 154). SFAS 154 requires
retrospective application to prior periods financial
statements for changes in accounting principle, unless it is
impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or
the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 also requires
that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method
for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a
change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting
principle. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The implementation of SFAS 154 is
not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In July 2006, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position. FIN 48
indicates that an enterprise shall initially recognize the
financial statement effects of a tax position when it is more
likely than not of being sustained on examination, based on the
technical merits of the position. In addition, FIN 48
indicates that the measurement of a tax position that meets the
more likely than not threshold shall consider the amounts and
probabilities of the outcomes that could be realized upon
ultimate settlement. This interpretation is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006 and interim periods
within those years. We are in the process of evaluating the
impact of adopting FIN 48 on our consolidated results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does
not require any new
46
fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in
guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements.
SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. The implementation of SFAS 157 is not expected to
have a material impact on our Companys consolidated
results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year
Financial Statements (SAB 108).
SAB 108 provides guidance on the consideration of the
effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year
misstatements for the purpose of determining whether the current
years financial statements are materially misstated.
SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2006. The implementation of SAB 108 is
not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of these financial statements requires us to
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we
evaluate our critical accounting policies and estimates,
including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts,
income taxes and intangible assets. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For further
information on our critical accounting policies, see the
discussion of critical accounting policies in our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, which was filed
with the SEC on December 18, 2006.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates. To mitigate some of
these risks, we utilize derivative financial instruments to
hedge these exposures. We do not use derivative financial
instruments for speculative or trading purposes nor do we issue
or hold leveraged derivative financial instruments.
Interest
Rates
We are exposed to interest rate risk related to our debt, which
bears interest based upon the three-month LIBOR rate. We have
reduced our exposure to interest rate fluctuations through the
purchase of interest rate caps covering a portion of our
variable rate debt. In 2006, we purchased two-year interest rate
caps for $118,000 with an initial notional amount of
$200 million declining to $150 million after one year
with an effective date of November 1, 2006 under which we
will receive interest payments if the three-month LIBOR rate
exceeds 6.5%. Based on effective interest rates at
January 31, 2007, a 50 basis point increase in interest
rates on our borrowings subject to variable interest rate
fluctuations would increase our interest expense by
approximately $2.5 million annually.
Foreign
Currency Risk
A majority of our business consists of sales made to customers
outside the United States. A substantial portion of the net
revenues we receive from such sales is denominated in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar. Additionally, portions of our
costs of net revenues and our other operating expenses are
incurred by our International operations and denominated in
local currencies. While fluctuations in the value of these net
revenues, costs and expenses as measured in U.S. dollars
have not materially affected our results of operations
historically, we cannot assure you that adverse currency
exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material impact in
the future. In addition, our balance sheet reflects
non-U.S. dollar
denominated assets and liabilities which can be adversely
affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. In certain
periods, we have not hedged our exposure to these fluctuations.
We have entered into foreign currency forward contracts and
other arrangements intended to hedge our exposure to
47
adverse fluctuations in exchange rates. As of January 31,
2007, we had no foreign currency forward contracts outstanding.
Effective February 1, 2007, we have entered into foreign
currency forward contracts to sell Australian dollars, Mexican
pesos, British pounds and Euros with notional amounts of
$2.8 million, $7.2 million, $3.4 million and
$16.3 million, respectively. If we chose not to enter into
foreign currency forward contracts to hedge against these
exposures and if the hedge currencies were to devalue 5% to 10%
against the U.S. dollar, results of operations would
include a foreign exchange loss of approximately
$1.5 million to $3.0 million.
Hedging arrangements of this sort may not always be effective to
protect our results of operations against currency exchange rate
fluctuations, particularly in the event of imprecise forecasts
of
non-U.S. denominated
assets and liabilities. Accordingly, if there is an adverse
movement in exchange rates, we might suffer significant losses.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
With the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, management has carried out an evaluation of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial
reporting.
During the first quarter of our fiscal year ending
October 31, 2007, as a result of our acquisition of Lipman,
we implemented the following changes to internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934):
|
|
|
|
|
Ensured the adoption of VeriFones accounting policies and
processes for Lipmans transactions
|
|
|
|
Enhanced the review for certain sales orders to ensure proper
accounting.
|
There have been no other changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting for the quarter ended January 31,
2007.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
In the ordinary course of our business, we are subject to
periodic lawsuits, investigations and claims. Although we cannot
predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits,
investigations and claims asserted against us, we do not believe
that any currently pending legal proceeding to which we are a
party is likely to have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, cash flows or financial
condition.
One of our Brazilian subsidiaries has been notified of a tax
assessment regarding Brazilian state value added tax, or VAT,
for the periods from January 2000 to December 2001 that relates
to products supplied to us by a contract manufacturer. The
assessment relates to an asserted deficiency of 7.6 million
Brazilian reais (approximately $3.6 million) including
interest and penalties. The tax assessment was based on a
clerical error in which our Brazilian subsidiary omitted the
required tax exemption number on its invoices. Management does
not expect that we will ultimately incur a material liability in
respect of this assessment, because they believe, based in part
on advice of our Brazilian tax counsel, that we are likely to
prevail in the proceedings relating to this assessment. On
May 25, 2005, we had an administrative hearing with the
Brazilian Tax Authority with respect to this audit. Management
expects to receive the decision of the administrative judges
sometime in 2007. In the event we receive an adverse ruling from
the administrative body, we will decide whether or not to appeal
and would reexamine the determination as to whether an accrual
is necessary. It is currently uncertain what impact this state
tax examination may have with respect to our use of a
corresponding exemption to reduce the Brazilian federal VAT.
48
Two of our Brazilian subsidiaries that were acquired as a part
of the Lipman acquisition have been notified of tax assessments
regarding Brazilian customs penalties that relate to alleged
infractions in the importation of goods. The assessments relate
to an asserted deficiency of 24.9 million Brazilian rais
(approximately $11.6 million) excluding interest and
penalties. The tax authorities allege that the structure used
for the importation of goods was simulated with the objective to
hide the real seller and buyer of the imported goods and that
the simulation was created through a fraudulent interposition of
parties. The fines with respect to one of the assessments were
reduced on a first level administrative decision on
January 26, 2007. The proceeding has been remitted to the
Taypayers Council to adjudicate the appeal of the first level
administrative decision filed by the tax authorities. We have
also appealed the first level administrative decision on
February 26, 2007. In this appeal, we argued that the tax
authorities did not have enough evidence to determine that the
import transactions were indeed fraudulent and that, even if
there were some irregularities in such importations, they could
not be deemed to be our responsibility since all the
transactions were performed by the importer of the goods.
Management expects to receive the decision of the Taxpayers
Council sometime in 2007. In the event we receive an adverse
ruling from the administrative body, we will decide whether or
not to appeal and would reexamine the determination as to
whether an accrual is necessary. As part of our integration
activities with respect to the Lipman acquisition, we are
reviewing operations in other Lipman entities to ensure that we
have in place business and financial controls that are
consistent with those we have historically applied to our
operations.
On December 11, 2006, we received a civil investigative
demand from the U.S. Department of Justice regarding an
investigation into our acquisition of Lipman which requests
certain documents and other information, principally with
respect to the companies integration plans and
communications prior to the completion of this acquisition.
Although we have commenced the process of gathering documents in
response to this request, we cannot predict what actions, if
any, will result from this investigation.
The following discussion supplements and amends the risk
factors previously disclosed as Item 1A in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended October 31, 2006, which are incorporated
herein by reference.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Although
we expect that the acquisition of Lipman will result in benefits
to our company, those benefits may not occur because of
integration and other challenges.
Achieving the benefits we expect from the acquisition of Lipman
depends in part on our ability to integrate VeriFones and
Lipmans technology, operations and personnel in a timely
and efficient manner. Although much of this integration has
already occurred, some of the more complex aspects of
integration will take time to complete. The challenges involved
in this integration include:
|
|
|
|
|
incorporating Lipmans technology and products into our
next generation of products;
|
|
|
|
integrating Lipmans technical team in Israel with our
larger and more widely dispersed engineering organization;
|
|
|
|
coordinating research and development activities to enhance
introduction of new products, services and technologies;
|
|
|
|
integrating Lipmans in-house manufacturing model with the
outsource model employed by VeriFone;
|
|
|
|
integrating Lipmans international operations with those of
VeriFone; and
|
|
|
|
persuading the employees in various jurisdictions that
Lipmans business cultures are compatible with ours,
maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees.
|
If our operations after the acquisition do not meet the
expectations of existing customers of VeriFone or Lipman, then
these customers may cease doing business with the company
altogether, which would harm our results of operations and
financial condition.
49
Costs associated with the acquisition are difficult to estimate,
may be higher than expected and may harm the financial results
of the combined company. We will incur substantial direct
expenses associated with the merger, and additional costs
associated with consolidation and integration of operations. If
the total costs of the acquisition exceed estimates or the
benefits of the acquisition do not exceed the total costs of the
acquisition, our financial results could be adversely affected.
A
significant percentage of our business is executed towards the
end of our fiscal quarters. This could negatively impact our
business and results of operations.
Revenues recognized in many of our fiscal quarters have been
back end loaded. Prior to our acquisition of Lipman, it had also
experienced back end loading of revenues to a greater extent.
Back end loading means that sales orders are being received and
revenue recognized disproportionately towards the end of each
fiscal quarter. If this back end loading becomes more
pronounced, our business and results of operations could be
adversely affected due to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the manufacturing processes in our internal manufacturing could
become concentrated in a shorter time period. This concentration
of manufacturing could increase labor and other manufacturing
costs and negatively impact gross margins. The risk of inventory
write offs could also increase if we were to hold higher
inventory levels to counteract this;
|
|
|
|
the higher concentration of orders may make it difficult to
accurately forecast component requirements and, as a result, we
could experience a shortage of the components needed for
production, possibly delaying shipments and causing lost
orders; and
|
|
|
|
if we are unable to fill orders at the end of a quarter
shipments may be delayed. This could increase the fluctuation of
quarterly results if shipments are delayed from one fiscal
quarter to the next or orders are cancelled by customers.
|
We
face risks related to a planned migration to a common enterprise
resource planning information system to integrate all business
and finance activities
We are in the process of migrating to a new enterprise resource
planning information system, which will replace our existing
system. We plan to integrate all business and finance activities
into this new system by the first quarter of fiscal year 2008.
Due to the size and complexity of our business, which is
compounded by the recent acquisition of Lipman, the conversion
process will be very challenging. Any disruptions and problems
that occur during the system conversion could adversely impact
our ability to finish the conversion in a timely and cost
effective way and could, moreover, interfere with the normal
operations of our business and finance activities. Even if we do
succeed in completing the conversion on a timely basis, the
implementation may be much more costly than we anticipated. If
we are unable to successfully implement our new information
system as planned, in addition to adversely impacting our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the
short and long term, it could also affect our ability to collect
the information necessary to timely file our financial reports
with the SEC.
A
majority of our net revenues is generated outside of North
America and we intend to continue to expand our operations
internationally. Our results of operations could suffer if we
are unable to manage our international expansion and operations
effectively.
During the three months ended January 31, 2007, 63% of
VeriFones net revenues were generated outside of North
America. We expect our percentage of net revenues generated
outside of North America to continue to increase in the coming
years. Part of our strategy is to expand our penetration in
existing foreign markets and to enter new foreign markets. Our
ability to penetrate some international markets may be limited
due to different technical standards, protocols or product
requirements. Expansion of our International business will
require significant management attention and financial
resources. Our International net revenues will depend on our
continued success in the following areas:
|
|
|
|
|
securing commercial relationships to help establish our presence
in international markets;
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
hiring and training personnel capable of marketing, installing
and integrating our solutions, supporting customers and managing
operations in foreign countries;
|
|
|
|
localizing our solutions to target the specific needs and
preferences of foreign customers, which may differ from our
traditional customer base in the United States;
|
|
|
|
building our brand name and awareness of our services among
foreign customers; and
|
|
|
|
implementing new systems, procedures and controls to monitor our
operations in new markets on a basis consistent with our
domestic operations;
|
In addition, we are subject to risks associated with operating
in foreign countries, including:
|
|
|
|
|
multiple, changing and often inconsistent enforcement of laws
and regulations;
|
|
|
|
satisfying local regulatory or industry imposed security or
other certification requirements;
|
|
|
|
competition from existing market participants that may have a
longer history in and greater familiarity with the foreign
markets we enter;
|
|
|
|
tariffs and trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
laws and business practices that favor local competitors;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
extended payment terms and the ability to collect account
receivables;
|
|
|
|
economic and political instability in foreign countries;
|
|
|
|
imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies
into U.S. dollars or remittance of dividends and other
payments by foreign subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions political
or economic conditions; and
|
|
|
|
greater difficulty in safeguarding intellectual property in
areas such as China, Russia and Latin America.
|
In addition, compliance with foreign and U.S. laws and
regulations that are applicable to our international operations
is complex and may increase our cost of doing business in
international jurisdictions and our international operations
could expose us to fines and penalties if we fail to comply with
these regulations. These laws and regulations include import and
export requirements, U.S. laws such as the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act, and local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to
governmental officials. Although we have implemented policies
and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws,
there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors and
agents will not take actions in violation of our policies,
particularly as we expand our operations through organic growth
and acquisitions. Any such violations could subject us to civil
or criminal penalties, including substantial fines or
prohibitions on our ability to offer our products and services
to one or more countries, and could also materially damage our
reputation, our brand, our international expansion efforts, our
business and our operating results. In addition, if we fail to
address the challenges and risks associated with international
expansion and acquisition strategy, we may encounter
difficulties implementing our strategy, which could impede our
growth or harm our operating results.
A
significant portion of our gross finished goods consists of
non-PCI compliant products. Due to an upcoming PCI deadline, we
must successfully deplete non-PCI inventory while transitioning
customers to PCI products. Our results of operations could
suffer if we are unable to manage our inventory and marketing
programs to meet this objective.
The major card associations have introduced new security
standards to address the growing demand for transaction
security. Visa International, MasterCard International and JCB
Co., Ltd. continue to cooperate on the development and release
of more stringent Payment Card Industry, or PCI, specification
and test methods for the certification of electronic payment
systems for secure debit transactions. This new set of standards
applies wherever Visa, MasterCard, and JCB cards are accepted
and must be adhered to by December 31, 2007, which means
that we
51
will not be able to sell non-PCI compliant products after this
date. A significant portion of our gross finished goods consist
of non-PCI compliant products. If we are not able to
successfully deplete this non-PCI inventory, or sales to
customers of PCI compliant products to not exceed existing sales
of non-PCI compliant products, our financial results could be
adversely affected.
We are
exposed to various risks related to legal proceedings or claims
that may harm our operating results or financial
condition.
In the ordinary course of our business, we are subject to
periodic lawsuits, investigations and claims. Although we cannot
predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits,
investigations and claims asserted- against us, we do not
believe that any currently pending legal proceeding to which we
are a party is likely to have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, cash flows or financial
condition.
One of our Brazilian subsidiaries has been notified of a tax
assessment regarding Brazilian state value added tax, or VAT,
for the periods from January 2000 to December 2001 that relates
to products supplied to us by a contract manufacturer. The
assessment relates to an asserted deficiency of 7.6 million
Brazilian reais (approximately $3.6 million) including
interest and penalties. The tax assessment was based on a
clerical error in which our Brazilian subsidiary omitted the
required tax exemption number on its invoices. On May 25,
2005, we had an administrative hearing with respect to this
audit. Management expects to receive the decision of the
administrative judges sometime in 2007. In the event we receive
an adverse ruling from the administrative body, we will decide
whether or not to appeal and would reexamine the determination
as to whether an accrual is necessary. It is currently uncertain
what impact this state tax examination may have with respect to
our use of a corresponding exemption to reduce the Brazilian
federal VAT.
Two of our Brazilian subsidiaries that were acquired as a part
of the Lipman acquisition have been notified of tax assessments
regarding Brazilian customs penalties that relate to alleged
infractions in the importation of goods. The assessments relate
to an asserted deficiency of 24.9 million Brazilian reais
(approximately $11.6 million) excluding interest and
penalties. The tax authorities allege that the structure used
for the importation of goods was simulated with the objective to
hide the real seller and buyer of the imported goods and that
the simulation was created through a fraudulent interposition of
parties. The fines with respect to one of the assessments were
reduced on a first level administrative decision on
January 26, 2007. The proceeding has been remitted to the
Taypayers Council to adjudicate the appeal of the first level
administrative decision filed by the tax authorities. We have
also appealed the first level administrative decision on
February 26, 2007. In this appeal, we argued that the tax
authorities did not have enough evidence to determine that the
import transactions were indeed fraudulent and that, even if
there were some irregularities in such importations, they could
not be deemed to be our responsibility since all the
transactions were performed by the importer of the goods.
Management expects to receive the decision of the Taxpayers
Council sometime in 2007. In the event we receive an adverse
ruling from the administrative body, we will decide whether or
not to appeal and would reexamine the determination as to
whether an accrual is necessary. As part of our integration
activities with respect to the Lipman acquisition, we are
reviewing operations in other Lipman entities to ensure that we
have in place business and financial controls that are
consistent with those we have historically applied to our
operations.
On December 11, 2006, we received a civil investigative
demand from the U.S. Department of Justice regarding an
investigation into our acquisition of Lipman which requests
certain documents and other information, principally with
respect to the companies integration plans and
communications prior to the completion of this acquisition.
Although we are in the process of gathering documents in
response to this request, we cannot predict what actions, if
any, will result from this investigation.
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
None
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
None
52
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
None
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None
Exhibits
The following documents are filed as Exhibits to this report:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated January 4, 2007, among VeriFone Holdings,
Inc., VeriFone, Inc., and Douglas G. Bergeron (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed January 5, 2007).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer as required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
VERIFONE HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Douglas
G. Bergeron
|
Douglas G. Bergeron
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Barry
Zwarenstein
|
Barry Zwarenstein
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 12, 2007
54
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated January 4, 2007, among VeriFone Holdings,
Inc., VeriFone, Inc., and Douglas G. Bergeron (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed January 5, 2007).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer as required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|