FORM 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
[X] |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
Or
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-11917
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa
|
|
42-1411715 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5400 University Avenue, West Des Moines, Iowa
|
|
50266 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (515) 225-5400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, without par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
(§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes x No
As of June 30, 2008, the aggregate market value of the registrants Class A and B Common Stock held
by non-affiliates of the registrant was $253,461,809 based on the closing sale price as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Outstanding at February 13, 2009 |
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, without par value
|
|
28,976,158 |
Class B Common Stock, without par value
|
|
1,192,990 |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
|
|
Document |
|
Parts Into Which Incorporated |
Proxy statement for annual shareholders meeting on May 20, 2009
|
|
Part III |
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Information
This Form 10-K includes statements relating to anticipated financial performance, business
prospects, new products, and similar matters. These statements and others, which include words
such as expect, anticipate, believe, intend, and other similar expressions, constitute
forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. A variety of
factors could cause our actual results and experiences to differ materially from the anticipated
results or other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements. The risks and
uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of our business
include but are not limited to the following.
|
|
|
Current difficult conditions in the financial markets and the economy may materially
adversely affect our business and results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Continuing adverse financial market conditions may significantly affect our liquidity,
access to capital and cost of capital. |
|
|
|
|
The Market Value Adjustment (MVA) feature on certain policies may cause surrenders to
increase in an extremely low interest rate environment. |
|
|
|
|
Our valuation of fixed maturity securities may include methodologies, estimations and
assumptions that are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to
investment valuations that may materially adversely affect our results of operations or
financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
Our investment portfolio is subject to credit quality risks which may diminish the value
of our invested assets and affect our profitability and reported book value per share. |
|
|
|
|
Changing interest rates, market volatility and general economic conditions affect the
risks and the returns on both our products and our investment portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
We face competition from companies having greater financial resources, more advanced
technology systems, broader arrays of products, higher ratings and stronger financial
performance, which may impair our ability to retain existing customers, attract new
customers and maintain our profitability and financial strength. |
|
|
|
|
As a holding company, we depend on our subsidiaries for funds to meet our obligations,
but our subsidiaries ability to make distributions to us is limited by law, and could be
affected by risk-based capital computations. |
|
|
|
|
A significant ratings downgrade may have a material adverse effect on our business. |
|
|
|
|
All segments of our business are highly regulated and these regulations or changes in
them could affect our profitability. |
|
|
|
|
Inaccuracies in assumptions regarding future persistency, mortality and interest rates
used in calculating reserve, deferred policy acquisition expense and deferred sales
inducement amounts and pricing our products could have a material adverse impact on our net
income (loss). |
|
|
|
|
We may be required to accelerate the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
or deferred sales inducements, which could adversely affect our results of operations or
financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
Our earnings are influenced by our claims experience, which is difficult to estimate. If
our future claims experience does not match our pricing assumptions or past results, our
earnings could be materially adversely affected. |
|
|
|
|
We assumed a significant amount of closed block business through coinsurance agreements
and have only a limited ability to manage this business. |
|
|
|
|
Our reinsurance program involves risks because we remain liable with respect to the
liabilities ceded to reinsurers if the reinsurers fail to meet the obligations assumed by
them. |
1
|
|
|
Our business is highly dependent on our relationships with Farm Bureau organizations and
would be adversely affected if those relationships became impaired. |
|
|
|
|
Our relationship with Farm Bureau organizations could result in conflicts of interests. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in federal tax laws may affect sales of our products and profitability. |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to maintain competitive costs is dependent upon the level of new sales and
persistency of existing business. |
|
|
|
|
If we are unable to attract and retain agents and develop new distribution sources,
sales of our products and services may be reduced. |
|
|
|
|
Attracting and retaining employees who are key to our business is critical to our growth
and success. |
|
|
|
|
Success of our business depends in part on effective information technology systems and
on continuing to develop and implement improvements. |
|
|
|
|
We experience volatility in net income(loss) due to accounting standards for
derivatives. |
|
|
|
|
We face risks relating to litigation, including the costs of such litigation, management
distraction and the potential for damage awards, which may adversely impact our business. |
See Part 1A, Risk Factors, for additional information.
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
FBL Financial Group, Inc. (we or us) sells individual life and annuity products principally under
the consumer brand names Farm Bureau Financial Services and EquiTrust Financial Services. These
brand identities are represented by the distribution channels of our subsidiaries, Farm Bureau Life
Insurance Company (Farm Bureau Life) and EquiTrust Life Insurance Company (EquiTrust Life). As of
December 31, 2008, our Farm Bureau Life distribution channel consisted of 1,962 exclusive agents
and agency managers. These agents and agency managers sell our products in the Midwestern and
Western sections of the United States. As of December 31, 2008, our EquiTrust Life independent
distribution channel consisted of 19,098 independent agents. These agents sell our products in all
states except New York, and also in the District of Columbia.
FBL Financial Group, Inc. was incorporated in Iowa in October 1993. Its subsidiary, Farm Bureau
Life, began operations in 1945 and subsidiary EquiTrust Life began operations under that name in
1998. Several other subsidiaries support various functional areas and affiliates by providing
investment advisory, marketing and distribution, and leasing services. In addition, we manage all
aspects of two Farm Bureau affiliated property-casualty insurance companies (Farm Bureau Mutual
Insurance Company and Western Agricultural Insurance Company) which operate predominately in eight
states in the Midwest and West.
FBLs Business by Company and Distribution Channel
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPANY
|
|
Farm Bureau Life
Insurance Company
|
|
EquiTrust Life
Insurance Company
|
|
Farm Bureau Mutual
Insurance Company*
Western Agricultural
Insurance Company* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANNEL
|
|
Direct
|
|
Direct
|
|
FBLs Managed
Property-Casualty Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTION
|
|
1,962 exclusive
Farm Bureau agents
and agency managers
|
|
19,098 independent
agents representing
broker/dealers, banks
and independent
marketing
organization
|
|
1,176 exclusive Farm Bureau
agents and agency managers
(included under the
1,962 Farm Bureau Life
agents) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRODUCTS
|
|
A comprehensive
line of life
insurance, annuity
and investment
products
|
|
Traditional fixed-rate
and index annuities
|
|
A full line of personal and
commercial
property-casualty insurance
products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TERRITORY
|
|
15 Midwestern and
Western states
|
|
Licensed in all states
except New York
|
|
Arizona, Iowa, Kansas,
Minnesota, Nebraska, New
Mexico, South Dakota and
Utah, and other states for
crop and nonstandard auto
insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
FBL Financial Group receives a management fee from these companies. Underwriting results do not
impact FBL Financial Groups results. |
3
Investor information, including electronic versions of periodic reports filed on Forms 10-K, 10-Q
and 8-K, and proxy material, are available free of charge through the Financial Information section
of our Internet website at www.fblfinancial.com. These documents are posted to our website
immediately after they are filed. Also available on our website are many corporate governance
documents including a code of ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers,
committee charters, corporate governance guidelines, director profiles and more. Product
information may be found on our consumer websites, www.fbfs.com and www.equitrust.com.
Business Strategy
Our core business strategies are differentiated by our target markets, which are served by our two
life insurance subsidiaries, Farm Bureau Life and EquiTrust Life.
Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Our 1,962 Farm Bureau Life agents are multi-line agents who sell both property-casualty insurance
products and life insurance and investment products under the Farm Bureau name. Having multi-line
agents enhances our ability to develop a more comprehensive relationship with our customers and
increases our ability to cross sell our life insurance and investment products to the pool of Farm
Bureau property-casualty customers.
The Farm Bureau franchise and distribution channel is our foundation and we are defined by our
service to this niche marketplace. Growth in this channel is important to our success and we are
focused on delivering consistent, predictable and sustainable growth from this marketplace.
We focus on needs-based selling and have a broad portfolio of life insurance and annuity products
so that we have attractive products available to satisfy the needs of our agents and customers.
Sales within our Farm Bureau Life target marketplace are the result of perceived good value,
excellent customer service and a trusted relationship with a Farm Bureau agent.
Because of their multi-line nature, our Farm Bureau Life agents also focus on cross selling life
insurance products to Farm Bureau members who already own a property-casualty policy issued by Farm
Bureau affiliated property-casualty companies. For example, in the eight-state region where we
manage the affiliated property-casualty insurance companies and related field force (Arizona, Iowa,
Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, South Dakota and Utah), 17% of our policyholders own both
a Farm Bureau property-casualty and a life product. This percentage is and has historically been
higher than the industry average for multi-line exclusive agents, which is 10.9% according to the
most recent research by Life Insurance and Market Research Association (LIMRA). We believe there
is further opportunity for growth from cross-selling as 68% of the Farm Bureau members in the
eight-state region have a Farm Bureau property-casualty insurance product, while only 20% of Farm
Bureau members in the eight-state region have a life insurance product with us.
We provide our agents with sales materials, the necessary training and a high level of sales
support. In addition, throughout our Farm Bureau marketing territory, certain agents are life and
investment specialists who work as a resource to help their fellow agents with cross selling
techniques and client needs analysis. We also provide a variety of sales support to our agents
through the following sources:
|
|
Just-In-Time Team Comprised of product and sales experts available to agents through a
toll-free call, this team can answer nearly any question related to products, sales
approaches, suitability and more. |
|
|
Advanced Markets Team This group is an extension of the Just-In-Time team and includes
high-end experts such as attorneys and others who specialize in financial matters. |
|
|
Life Sales Advisors These field representatives are located strategically across our
15-state territory. They provide direct, hands-on training and support to agents on our broad
portfolio of products. |
Over the last several years we have focused on transforming our sales model so that our agents act
like entrepreneurial business owners with a retail financial services franchise. Under this model
our agents continue to
4
add sales and service associates, who assist them and are licensed to sell life and annuity
products. While our agent count has not changed significantly over time, our production per agent
has increased.
Farm Bureau Lifes growth has been augmented by our long and successful history of being a
consolidator among Farm Bureau affiliated insurance companies. Over the last 24 years we have had
10 consolidations. This has allowed us to grow to an operation covering 15 states in the Midwest
and West. We believe further consolidation in the Farm Bureau network of companies is appropriate
due to the similarity of businesses and cultures. While we believe further consolidation makes
sense, this is a long term strategy. By focusing on maintaining solid relationships with the
leaders of these companies and the Farm Bureau organizations, we are prepared when opportunities
arise.
EquiTrust Life Insurance Company
EquiTrust Life was established to capitalize on opportunities to grow outside our traditional Farm
Bureau niche marketplace and provide diversification to the overall FBL organization. Today
EquiTrust Life has three business dimensions: our EquiTrust Life independent channel, alliances
with other companies to distribute our variable products and two closed blocks of coinsured
business.
Our EquiTrust Life independent channel began in late 2003 and was developed to serve a growing
market of baby boomers and seniors who are approaching or are in retirement. Our focus has been on
offering a portfolio of clean and simple fixed annuity products and providing a high level of
service. As of December 31, 2008, the EquiTrust Life independent channel had 19,098 appointed
independent agents, which compares to 19,781 agents at December 31, 2007 and 15,326 agents at
December 31, 2006. These independent agents are affiliated with independent marketing
organizations, broker/dealers and banks. Since its inception in 2003, our EquiTrust Life
independent channel has had a high rate of growth, causing it to require an increasing amount of
capital. Due to adverse market conditions, which have affected the availability and cost of
capital, during 2008 we slowed the pace of growth at EquiTrust Life. This slower pace of growth,
coupled with natural attrition of existing agents, led to a decrease in appointed agents in 2008.
Future sales levels may be impacted by the enactment of Rule 151A by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). This rule, which is expected to be effective on January 12, 2011, will change
the federal law status of index annuities from insurance products to registered securities
products. See Item 1. Business Regulation for more information on this rule.
We continue to offer a variety of traditional fixed rate and index annuities. Our multi-year
guarantee annuity product allows our customers to lock in competitive rates for a period of their
choice, while our index annuities respond to consumers desire for products which allow interest
credits that reflect movement in broad market indices while limiting the downside risk with certain
principal guarantees.
We also have variable product alliances through which we provide our partner companies with
competitive variable products. With these alliances, we obtain access to additional distribution
systems and our alliance partners benefit because they are able to provide their sales force with
variable products. We currently have four variable alliance partners which include three other
Farm Bureau affiliated insurance companies doing business outside of our 15-state territory. Our
four alliance partners had 2,442 registered representatives at December 31, 2008.
Variable sales by our alliance partners are generally underwritten by EquiTrust Life, but may be
underwritten by our partner. Depending on the agreement with each company, we receive 30%, 50% or
100% of the risks, costs and profits of the variable business they sell. For all of our partners,
we perform various administrative processing and other services with respect to their variable
business. These alliances are important to us, but are a small part of our overall business.
Our two closed block coinsurance agreements have provided us with significant assets and earnings.
Up until August 1, 2004, we assumed, through a coinsurance agreement, a percentage of certain
annuity business written by American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company (American Equity).
Our other closed block coinsurance agreement is with EMC National Life Company (EMCNL), under which
we assumed in force business through December 31, 2002.
5
Marketing and Distribution
Farm Bureau Life Market Area
Sales through our Farm Bureau Life distribution channel are conducted in 15 states which we
characterize as follows: multi-line states (we own the Farm Bureau affiliated life company and
manage the Farm Bureau affiliated property-casualty companies) Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota,
Nebraska, New Mexico, South Dakota and Utah; and life only states (we own the Farm Bureau
affiliated life company and non-owned/non-managed Farm Bureau affiliated property-casualty
companies manage the exclusive multi-line agents) Colorado, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota,
Oklahoma, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
Our target market for Farm Bureau branded products is Farm Bureau members and Middle America in
our 15-state territory. We traditionally have been very strong in rural and small town markets
and, over the last several years, have focused growth of our agency force in some of the
medium-sized cities and suburbs within our 15 states where we believe there are significant life
and annuity opportunities. This target market represents a relatively financially conservative and
stable customer base. The financial needs of our target market tend to focus on security,
insurance needs and retirement savings.
Affiliation with Farm Bureau
Many of our customers are members of Farm Bureau organizations affiliated with the American Farm
Bureau Federation (American Farm Bureau), the nations largest grass roots farm and ranch
organization with more than 6.2 million member families. In order to market insurance products in
a given state using the Farm Bureau and FB designations, related trademarks and service marks,
a company must have an agreement with the states Farm Bureau organization. Generally, these
marketing rights have only been granted to companies owned by or closely affiliated with Farm
Bureau federations. For each of the states in our Farm Bureau marketing territory, we have the
exclusive right to use the Farm Bureau name and FB logo for marketing life insurance and
investment products.
All of the state Farm Bureau federations in our 15-state Farm Bureau Life marketing area are
associated with the American Farm Bureau. The primary goal of the American Farm Bureau is to
improve the financial well being and quality of life of farmers and ranchers through education and
representation with respect to public policy issues. There are currently Farm Bureau federations
in all 50 states and Puerto Rico, each with their own distinctive mission and goals. Within each
state, Farm Bureau is organized at the county level. Farm Bureau programs generally include policy
development, government relations activities, leadership development and training, communications,
market education classes, commodity conferences and young farmer activities. Member services
provided by Farm Bureau vary by state but often include programs such as risk management,
alternative energy development and guidance on enhancing profitability. Other benefits of
membership include newspaper and magazine subscriptions, as well as savings in areas such as health
care, entertainment and automobile rebates. In addition, members have access to theft and arson
rewards, accidental death insurance, banking services, credit card programs, computerized farm
accounting services, electronic information networks, feeder cattle procurement services, health
care insurance, property-casualty insurance and financial services.
The American Farm Bureau may terminate our right to use the Farm Bureau and FB designations in
all of our states (i) in the event of a material breach of the trademark license that we do not
cure within 60 days, (ii) immediately in the event of termination by the American Farm Bureau of
the state Farm Bureaus membership in the American Farm Bureau or (iii) in the event of a material
breach of the state Farm Bureau federations membership agreement with the American Farm Bureau,
including by reason of the failure of the state Farm Bureau to cause us to adhere to the American
Farm Bureaus policies.
We have royalty agreements with each state Farm Bureau organization in our Farm Bureau marketing
territory giving us the right to use the Farm Bureau and FB designations in that particular
state. Each state Farm Bureau organization in our Farm Bureau territory could terminate our right
to use the Farm Bureau designations in that particular state without cause at the conclusion of the
royalty agreements. The royalties paid to a particular state Farm Bureau organization are based on
the sale of our products in the respective state. For 2008, royalty expense totaled approximately
$1.9 million. The royalty agreements vary in term and expiration date as shown below.
6
Royalty Agreements by State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
Farm Bureau Life |
|
|
|
Royalty Agreement |
|
2008 First Year |
|
State |
|
Expiration Date |
|
Premiums Collected |
|
Iowa |
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
Kansas |
|
January 1, 2021 |
|
|
18.8 |
|
Oklahoma |
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
11.4 |
|
Minnesota |
|
December 31, 2032 |
|
|
6.7 |
|
Nebraska |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
4.9 |
|
Utah |
|
December 31, 2032 |
|
|
4.8 |
|
Wyoming |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
Arizona |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
Idaho |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
3.7 |
|
Montana |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
New Mexico |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
3.0 |
|
South Dakota |
|
December 31, 2032 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
Wisconsin |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
Colorado |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
North Dakota |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our relationship with Farm Bureau provides a number of advantages. Farm Bureau organizations in
our current territory tend to be well known and long established, have active memberships and
provide a number of member benefits other than financial services. The strength of these
organizations provides enhanced prestige and brand awareness for our products and increased access
to Farm Bureau members, which results in a competitive advantage for us.
Our life insurance and investment products are available for sale to both members and non-members.
Property-casualty products sold by the property-casualty insurance companies affiliated with Farm
Bureau are generally only available for sale to Farm Bureau members. Annual Farm Bureau
memberships in our Farm Bureau marketing territory generally cost $35 to $220 and are available to
individuals, families, partnerships or corporations.
We have marketing agreements with all of the Farm Bureau-affiliated property-casualty companies in
our Farm Bureau Life marketing area, pursuant to which the property-casualty companies provide
certain services, which include recruiting and training the shared agency force that sells both
property-casualty products for that company and life products for us. The marketing agreements
have expiration dates through December 31, 2015, and upon expiration these agreements are renewed
annually. For 2008, we incurred fees totaling $8.5 million for the services provided under these
agreements.
Our Advisory Committee, which consists of executives of the Farm Bureau property-casualty insurance
companies in our marketing territory, assists us in our relationships with the property-casualty
organizations and the Farm Bureau federation leaders in their respective states. The Advisory
Committee meets on a regular basis to coordinate efforts and issues involving the agency force and
other matters. The Advisory Committee is an important contributor to our success in marketing
products through our Farm Bureau distribution system.
Farm Bureau Life Agency Force
Our life insurance, annuities and sponsored mutual funds are currently marketed throughout our
15-state marketing territory by an exclusive Farm Bureau agency force. We have a written contract
with each member of our agency force. The contracts cover a number of topics including reserving
our ownership of customer lists.
Sales activities of our agents focus on personal contact and on cross selling the multiple lines of
products available through Farm Bureau affiliated companies. The Farm Bureau name recognition and
access to Farm Bureau membership leads to additional customers and cross selling of additional
insurance products.
7
Our Farm Bureau Life agents are independent contractors and exclusive agents. In the multi-line
states where we manage the Farm Bureau affiliated property-casualty companies, our agents are led
by agency managers employed by the property-casualty companies which are under our direction.
There are 1,176 agents and managers in our multi-line states, all of whom market a full range of
our life insurance and annuity products. These agents and managers also market products for the
property-casualty companies that we manage.
In our life only states, our life insurance and annuity products are marketed by agents of the
property-casualty company affiliated with the Farm Bureau federation of that state. These agents
and managers, of which there are 786, market our life and annuity products on an exclusive basis
and market the property-casualty products of that states affiliated property-casualty companies.
Agents as well as agency managers are independent contractors or employees of the affiliated
property-casualty companies.
In addition, Farm Bureau Life agents market mutual funds sponsored by us, as well as other mutual
funds which we allow them to sell.
As of December 31, 2008, 98% of the agents in our multi-line states were licensed with the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to sell our variable life and annuity products and
sponsored mutual funds. We emphasize and encourage the training of agents for FINRA licensing
throughout our Farm Bureau Life territory.
We are responsible for product and sales training for all lines of business in our multi-line
states, and for training the agency force in life insurance products and sales methods in our life
only states.
We structure our agents life products compensation system to encourage production and persistency.
Agents receive commissions for new life insurance and annuity sales and service fees on premium
payments in subsequent years. Production bonuses are paid based on the premium level of new life
business written in the prior 12 months and the persistency of the business written by the agent.
Persistency is a common measure used in life insurance, which measures the quality and the
consistent payment of premiums, and is included in calculating the bonus to either increase or
decrease (or even eliminate) the agents production bonus. We are willing to pay added incentives
for higher volumes of business only as long as the business is profitable. Production bonuses
allow agents to increase their compensation significantly. In 2008, approximately 30% of agent
compensation in our multi-line states was derived from the sale of life and annuity products.
The focus of agency managers is to recruit and train agents to achieve high production levels of
profitable business. Managers receive overwrite commissions on each agents life insurance
commissions which vary according to that agents productivity level and persistency of business.
During the first three years of an agents relationship with us, the agents manager receives
additional overwrite commissions to encourage early agent development. Early agent development is
also encouraged through financing arrangements and the annualization of commissions paid when a
life policy is sold.
We have a variety of incentives and recognition programs to focus agents on production of quality
life insurance business. Some recognition programs and incentives are jointly conducted with the
property-casualty companies. These programs provide significant incentives for the most productive
agents. Approximately 9% of our agents and agency managers qualify for our annual incentive trip.
Agent recruiting, training, financing and compensation programs are designed to develop a
productive agent for the long term. The four-year agency force retention rate for 2008 in our 15
states was approximately 38%.
EquiTrust Life Market Area
EquiTrust Life is national in scope and is currently licensed to sell products in the District of
Columbia and all states except New York. Our typical customer is an individual purchaser of
annuities who buys through independent agents and representatives. This includes the aging baby
boomer population and seniors who are in or approaching retirement.
8
EquiTrust Life Independent Channel
An important part of our sales success at EquiTrust Life has been our ability to appoint a
significant number of independent agents. Working through independent marketing organizations,
broker/dealers and banks, we had 19,098 agents appointed at December 31, 2008.
Our target market for agents consists of independent marketing organizations (IMOs) that recruit
and motivate agents and add value to these agents through service, training and sales support.
These organizations are not exclusive to EquiTrust Life and may operate in any state where they are
licensed. Most are organized for the principal purpose of insurance product sales. Some IMOs are
organized for other purposes, such as a bank or broker/dealer. Recruiting expenses are primarily
borne by the IMO and their compensation from EquiTrust Life consists of commissions paid on net
premiums received from sales by their agents.
We believe agents and IMOs are attracted to EquiTrust Life for several reasons.
|
|
|
We are selective about the IMOs contracted with us and do not hire carrier-owned
organizations. |
|
|
|
|
We offer a high level of support and a competitive product portfolio, and are committed
to maintaining high ethical standards. |
|
|
|
|
We keep our product design simple and straightforward, and in the case of index
annuities have only one moving part the participation rate or index cap. |
|
|
|
|
We are committed to being fair, honest and open in the way we advertise, sell and
service our products, as indicated by being an Insurance Marketplace Standards Association
(IMSA) qualified company. |
|
|
|
|
We believe in helping consumers understand what an annuity is and how it can be used to
support an individuals retirement or accumulation needs. |
Agents appointed by us are compensated by their assigned IMO or paid directly by EquiTrust Life
pursuant to an agent contract. The typical agent is an independent contractor with experience
selling the types of products offered by EquiTrust Life.
We require all agents to be contracted with an IMO which is responsible for any uncollectible
commission-related debts. Credit, criminal and state license background checks are performed on
all applicants and evidence of current errors and omissions insurance coverage is required.
Alliance Partners Distribution
Our variable alliance partners have 2,442 registered representatives who are licensed to sell
variable products under our agreements with them. These alliance partners have incentive programs,
like ours, to promote the sale of life insurance and annuity products. The agents earn credit for
these incentives by selling our variable products. Our variable product alliance partners are
responsible for managing and training their own agency force. We provide each partner with
assistance on how to train their agents in the sale of variable products. These agents also have
access to our Just-In-Time sales support center.
Segmentation of Our Business
We analyze operations by reviewing financial information regarding products that are aggregated
into four product segments. The product segments are (1) Traditional Annuity Exclusive
Distribution (Exclusive Annuity), (2) Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution
(Independent Annuity), (3) Traditional and Universal Life Insurance and (4) Variable. We also
have various support operations and corporate capital that are aggregated into a Corporate and
Other segment.
See Note 14 of the notes to consolidated financial statements and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Segment Information for additional
information regarding our financial results by operating segment. Included in the following
discussion of our segments are details regarding premiums collected by product type and
distribution source. Premiums collected is not a measure used in financial statements prepared
according to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). There is no comparable GAAP
financial measure. We use premiums collected to measure the productivity of our exclusive and
independent agents.
9
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Annuity Segment
We sell a variety of traditional annuity products through our exclusive agency force. The
Exclusive Annuity segment primarily consists of fixed rate annuities and supplementary contracts
(some of which involve life contingencies). Traditional annuities provide for tax-deferred savings
and supplementary contracts provide for the systematic repayment of funds that accumulate interest.
Premiums Collected Exclusive Annuity Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
First year individual |
|
$ |
170,675 |
|
|
$ |
73,266 |
|
|
$ |
79,546 |
|
Renewal individual |
|
|
69,177 |
|
|
|
44,543 |
|
|
|
55,106 |
|
Group |
|
|
9,187 |
|
|
|
9,040 |
|
|
|
5,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
249,039 |
|
|
$ |
126,849 |
|
|
$ |
140,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of traditional annuity premiums collected is highly dependent upon the relationship
between the current crediting rates on our products and the crediting rates available on competing
products, including bank-offered certificates of deposit. We believe the increase in annuity
premiums in 2008 is due to lower short-term market interest rates making certificates of deposit
and other short-term investments less attractive in relation to these traditional annuities.
Average crediting rates on our individual deferred annuity contracts were 4.04% in 2008, 4.33% in
2007 and 4.27% in 2006, while the average three-month U.S. Treasury rate was 1.49% in 2008, 4.39%
in 2007 and 4.66% in 2006. Premiums collected in our Farm Bureau market territory in 2008 are
concentrated in the following states: Iowa (30%), Kansas (26%) and Oklahoma (11%).
Fixed Rate Annuities
We offer annuities that are generally marketed to individuals in anticipation of retirement. We
offer traditional annuities principally in the form of flexible premium deferred annuities (FPDA)
that allow policyholders to make contributions over a number of periods. For traditional annuity
products, policyholder account balances are credited interest at rates that we determine.
Approximately 39% of our existing individual direct traditional annuity business based on account
balances is held in qualified retirement plans. To further encourage persistency, a surrender
charge against the policyholders account balance is imposed for early termination of the annuity
contract within a specified period after its effective date. The surrender charge rate varies by
product, but typically starts at 10% and decreases 1% per year for the first ten years the contract
is in force. The annuitant may elect to take the proceeds of the annuity either in a single
payment or in a series of payments for life, for a fixed number of years, or a combination of these
options.
In addition to FPDAs, we also market single premium deferred annuity (SPDA) and single premium
immediate annuity (SPIA) products which feature a single premium paid when the contract is issued.
Benefit payments and the surrender charge structure on SPDA contracts are similar to other fixed
rate annuities. Benefit payments on SPIAs begin immediately after the issuance of the contract.
After the payment of acquisition costs, we invest the premiums we receive from fixed rate annuities
and the investments reside in our general account. The difference between the yield we earn on our
investment portfolio and the interest we credit on our fixed rate annuities is known as the
investment spread. The investment spread is a major driver of the profitability for all of our
traditional annuity products.
Withdrawal Rates
Withdrawal rates (excluding death benefits) for our individual deferred annuities were 3.9% for
2008, 5.2% for 2007 and 5.1% for 2006. We believe the competitive environment, due to changes in
market interest rates discussed above, resulted in fewer surrenders in 2008 and increased
surrenders in 2007 and 2006, which impacted the withdrawal rates.
10
Interest Crediting Policy
We have an asset/liability management committee that meets monthly, or more frequently if required,
to review and establish current period interest rates based upon existing and anticipated
investment opportunities. This applies to new sales and to annuity products after an initial
guaranteed period. We examine earnings on assets by portfolio. We then establish rates based on
each products required interest spread and competitive market conditions at the time. Most of our
annuity contracts have guaranteed minimum crediting rates. These rates range from 1.50% to 5.50%,
with a weighted average guaranteed crediting rate of 3.09% at December 31, 2008 and 3.21% at
December 31, 2007.
Interest Crediting Rates of Individual Deferred Fixed Rate Annuities Compared to Guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Value at December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
At guaranteed rate |
|
$ |
309,307 |
|
|
$ |
96,885 |
|
Between guaranteed rate and 50 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
56,208 |
|
|
|
225,882 |
|
Between 50 basis points and 100 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
634,872 |
|
|
|
22,817 |
|
Greater than 100 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
570,821 |
|
|
|
1,082,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,571,208 |
|
|
$ |
1,427,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Force Exclusive Annuity Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Number of direct contracts |
|
|
51,439 |
|
|
|
51,311 |
|
|
|
53,321 |
|
Interest sensitive reserves |
|
$ |
1,971,218 |
|
|
$ |
1,810,452 |
|
|
$ |
1,816,811 |
|
Other insurance reserves |
|
|
381,838 |
|
|
|
407,199 |
|
|
|
412,801 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution Segment
The Independent Annuity segment consists of fixed rate annuities, supplementary contracts (some of
which involve life contingencies) and index annuities sold by our independent agents or assumed
through our coinsurance agreements.
Premiums Collected Independent Annuity Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Direct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate annuities |
|
$ |
915,843 |
|
|
$ |
690,646 |
|
|
$ |
807,103 |
|
Index annuities |
|
|
649,412 |
|
|
|
878,482 |
|
|
|
1,001,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct |
|
|
1,565,255 |
|
|
|
1,569,128 |
|
|
|
1,808,482 |
|
Reinsurance assumed |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
3,187 |
|
|
|
4,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Traditional Annuity -
Independent Distribution, net of
reinsurance |
|
$ |
1,567,636 |
|
|
$ |
1,572,315 |
|
|
$ |
1,813,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums collected from the independent channel decreased in 2008 as a result of rate and other
actions taken to preserve capital in the second half of 2008, partially offset by a more favorable
market environment for traditional annuity products. Direct premiums collected decreased in 2007,
primarily due to a more favorable market environment during 2006 for the sale of our multi-year
guaranteed annuity product combined with a competitive environment for index annuity sales in 2007.
Our direct annuity sales in 2008 are widely disbursed throughout the United States with the
largest concentration in the states of Pennsylvania (10%), Florida (9%) and California (7%). In
2008, 97 IMOs produced at least $3.0 million of premiums collected with the largest providing
approximately $153.5 million. The five largest IMOs combined produced a total of $435.0 million of
premium from agents appointed directly with them. No one IMO, bank or broker/dealer accounted for
more than 10% of our direct premiums collected in 2008.
11
Our EquiTrust Life independent channel currently offers a variety of fixed rate and index
annuities. These products are available to individuals who are seeking to accumulate tax-deferred
savings for retirement or other purposes. In 2008, 41% of premiums were placed in annuities that
were part of some tax-qualified benefit plan (primarily IRAs) and 59% in non-qualified plans. Most
of the annuity plans can be sold to customers up to age 80. The weighted average issue age of
annuitants at December 31, 2008 was 66.
Surrender charge rates on our direct index business range from 0% to 20% and surrender charge
periods range from 7 years to 14 years depending upon the terms of the product. Surrender charge
rates on our direct fixed rate products range from 4.5% to 10% with the surrender charge periods
consistent with the guarantee periods. The surrender charge amount may be impacted positively or
negatively by a market value adjustment feature on our products. This adjustment feature may apply
if the withdrawal amount exceeds the free withdrawal provision or the contract is surrendered
during the surrender charge period. The adjustment is determined by a mathematical formula which
measures changes in the interest rate environment since the contract was issued based on the
Treasury yield. This feature provides interest rate protection to us in higher interest rate
environments and a benefit to contract holders when interest rates are low. Market conditions with
low Treasury yields provide an environment where contract holders may be able to surrender with
smaller net surrender changes.
Index Annuities
Based on account balance, approximately 62% of the annuities in the Independent Annuity segment are
index annuities. With an index annuity, the policyholder may choose from a traditional fixed rate
strategy or an index strategy. The underlying indices available under the index strategy vary by
product, but may include the S&P 500®, the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the
Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Bond Index. The products require periodic crediting of interest and
a reset of the applicable index at intervals specified in the contracts. Approximately 25% of the
direct index annuities account value is allocated to the fixed strategy and 75% is allocated to an
index strategy. The majority of these products have an annual reset period ending on each contract
anniversary date; while certain index strategies have a two-year reset period. Generally, the
computation of the index credit is based upon either a point-to-point calculation (i.e., the gain
in the applicable index from the beginning of the applicable contract year to the next reset date)
or a daily or monthly averaging of the index during the reset period. These products allow contract
holders to transfer funds among the various index accounts and a traditional fixed rate strategy at
the end of each reset period.
The index annuity contract value is equal to the premiums paid plus (1) interest credited to the
fixed portion of the contract, plus (2) index credits on the indexed portion of the contract, plus
(3) premium bonus, if applicable, less (4) partial withdrawals taken from the contract. Index
credits are based upon the change in a recognized index or benchmark during the indexing period,
subject to a cap, asset fee or participation rate.
The participation rate, which is applied to the growth of the index, varies among the products
generally from 30% to 100%. Some of the products we coinsure also have an index margin, which is
deducted from the growth in the index, and for the one-year accounts range from 0% to 3.5%. The
index margins may be adjusted annually, subject to stated limits. In addition, some index accounts
within the products are uncapped, while others apply a cap on the amount of index credits the
contract holder may earn in any one indexing period, and, for certain products, the applicable cap
also may be adjusted annually subject to stated minimums. The annual caps range from 2.0% to 12.5%
for the one-year accounts. The minimum guaranteed contract values are equal to 82.5% to 100% of
the premium collected plus interest credited at an annual rate ranging from 1.5% to 4.0% on a
cumulative basis.
Certain index annuities sold through the EquiTrust Life independent distribution are bonus
products. These products are credited with a premium bonus ranging from 5% to 10% of the annuity
deposit upon issuance of the contract and for subsequent deposits made for a defined number of
years.
For our direct business, we purchase one-year or two-year call options on the applicable market
indices to fund the index credits due to the index annuity contract holders. We also assume call
options from American Equity to fund the majority of index credits on the coinsured index annuity
contracts. On the respective anniversary dates of the index annuity contracts, the market index
used to compute the index credits is reset and new call options are purchased to fund the next
index credit. The cost of the options can be managed through the terms of the index annuities,
which permit changes to participation rates, asset fees and/or caps, subject to minimum guarantees.
12
After the purchase of the call options and payment of acquisition costs, we invest the balance of
the index premiums and the investments reside in our general account. With respect to that portion
of the index account value allocated to an index crediting strategy, our spread is measured as the
difference between the aggregate yield on the relevant portion of our invested assets, less the
aggregate option costs and the costs associated with minimum guarantees. If the minimum guaranteed
value of an index product exceeds the index value (computed on a cumulative basis over the life of
the contract), the general account earnings are available to satisfy the minimum guarantees. If
there were little or no gains in the entire series of options purchased over the expected life of
an index annuity (typically 15 to 20 years), we would incur expenses for credited interest over and
above our option costs. In addition, if we are not successful in matching the terms of call
options purchased with the terms of the index annuities, index credits could exceed call option
proceeds. This would cause our spreads to tighten and reduce our profits.
Fixed Rate Annuities
Approximately 38% of the annuities in the Independent Annuity segment are fixed rate annuities. We
sell multi-year guaranteed annuities (MYGAs) that include guarantees of the annual crediting rate
for three-year, five-year, six-year, eight-year or ten-year periods, and we offer SPIA and FPDA
products. We coinsure FPDA and SPDA products with characteristics which are generally similar to
the products offered directly through the Exclusive Annuity segment.
Certain fixed rate annuities sold through our EquiTrust Life independent distribution offer an
additional first year interest rate. The initial crediting rate on these annuities is typically 0%
to 6% higher in the first contract year only.
Withdrawal Rates
Withdrawal rates (excluding death benefits) for our individual deferred annuities (including both
direct and assumed business) were 7.8% for 2008, 5.5% for 2007 and 5.1% for 2006. The increase in
the withdrawal rate in 2008 reflects the aging of the business in force as well as a significant
increase in surrender activity at the end of 2008. This was caused by the increase in credit
spreads during 2008, combined with Treasury yields being at unprecedented low levels at the end of
the year, which provided market value adjustments to contract holders that largely offset their
gross surrender charges. .
See Item 1A. Risk Factors for information regarding risks related to the market value adjustment
feature.
Interest Crediting Policy
We have an asset/liability management committee that meets monthly, or more frequently if required,
to review and establish current period interest and index terms for products sold through our
EquiTrust Life independent distribution. The interest and index terms are based upon current
investment opportunities. This applies to new sales and to annuity products after an initial
guaranteed period, if applicable. We then establish rates based on each products required
interest spread and competitive market conditions at the time. The average interest credited rate
on our MYGA contracts, including bonus interest, was 4.93% in 2008, 5.10% in 2007 and 5.66% in
2006. The average rate for these contracts, excluding bonus interest, was 4.71% in 2008, 4.66% in
2007 and 4.56% in 2006. The guaranteed minimum crediting rates for these contracts range from
1.50% to 3.00%, with a weighted average guaranteed crediting rate of 1.57% at December 31, 2008 and
1.60% at December 31, 2007.
Interest Crediting Rates of EquiTrust Life Independent Distribution MYGAs Compared to Guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Value at December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
At guaranteed rate |
|
$ |
29,897 |
|
|
$ |
3,157 |
|
Between guaranteed rate and 50 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
2,807 |
|
|
|
4,894 |
|
Between 50 basis points and 100 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
321,212 |
|
|
|
192,215 |
|
Greater than 100 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
2,042,625 |
|
|
|
1,421,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,396,541 |
|
|
$ |
1,621,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
The average crediting rate for the traditional fixed rate strategy for our index annuities sold
through our EquiTrust Life independent distribution was 2.93% in 2008, 3.01% in 2007 and 2.98% in
2006. The guaranteed minimum crediting rates for the fixed rate strategy of our index annuities
range from 1.50% to 2.30%, with a weighted average guaranteed crediting rate of 1.94% at December
31, 2008 and 1.92% at December 31, 2007.
We do not have the ability to adjust interest crediting rates or other non-guaranteed elements of
the underlying business assumed through coinsurance agreements, as this authority remains with the
direct writer. Average credited rates on fixed rate annuities assumed were 3.35% in 2008, 3.44% in
2007 and 3.42% in 2006. Most of the annuity contracts assumed through coinsurance agreements have
guaranteed minimum crediting rates. These rates range from 2.25% to 4.00%.
Interest Crediting Rates of Assumed Fixed Rate Annuities Compared to Guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Value at December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
At guaranteed rate |
|
$ |
42,038 |
|
|
$ |
60,294 |
|
Between guaranteed rate and 50 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
386,472 |
|
|
|
399,098 |
|
Between 50 basis points and 100 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
41,490 |
|
|
|
34,009 |
|
Greater than 100 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
14,145 |
|
|
|
54,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
484,145 |
|
|
$ |
547,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Force Independent Annuity Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Number of direct contracts |
|
|
93,769 |
|
|
|
73,980 |
|
|
|
51,007 |
|
Direct interest sensitive reserves |
|
$ |
2,398,237 |
|
|
$ |
1,607,009 |
|
|
$ |
962,662 |
|
Direct index annuity reserves |
|
|
3,581,396 |
|
|
|
3,387,727 |
|
|
|
2,463,086 |
|
Assumed annuity reserves |
|
|
1,583,754 |
|
|
|
1,766,735 |
|
|
|
1,928,218 |
|
Direct other insurance reserves |
|
|
145,036 |
|
|
|
64,242 |
|
|
|
13,983 |
|
14
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance Segment
We sell a variety of traditional and universal life insurance products through our exclusive agency
force. In addition, we have assumed a closed block of in force traditional and universal life
insurance. The Traditional and Universal Life Insurance segment consists of whole life, term life
and universal life policies. These policies provide benefits upon the death of the insured and may
also allow the customer to build cash value on a tax-deferred basis.
Premiums Collected Traditional and Universal Life Insurance Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Universal life: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First year |
|
$ |
6,672 |
|
|
$ |
5,448 |
|
|
$ |
3,208 |
|
Renewal |
|
|
39,338 |
|
|
|
39,027 |
|
|
|
38,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
46,010 |
|
|
|
44,475 |
|
|
|
41,637 |
|
Participating whole life: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First year |
|
|
12,089 |
|
|
|
14,680 |
|
|
|
14,286 |
|
Renewal |
|
|
93,378 |
|
|
|
91,249 |
|
|
|
87,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
105,467 |
|
|
|
105,929 |
|
|
|
102,039 |
|
Term life and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First year |
|
|
10,414 |
|
|
|
9,291 |
|
|
|
7,312 |
|
Renewal |
|
|
49,135 |
|
|
|
44,518 |
|
|
|
40,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
59,549 |
|
|
|
53,809 |
|
|
|
48,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
211,026 |
|
|
|
204,213 |
|
|
|
191,825 |
|
Reinsurance assumed |
|
|
10,913 |
|
|
|
11,695 |
|
|
|
12,464 |
|
Reinsurance ceded |
|
|
(19,094 |
) |
|
|
(18,309 |
) |
|
|
(16,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Traditional and Universal Life Insurance, net of reinsurance |
|
$ |
202,845 |
|
|
$ |
197,599 |
|
|
$ |
187,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For our direct traditional and universal life insurance premiums collected in our Farm Bureau
market territory, premiums collected in 2008 are concentrated primarily in the following states:
Iowa (24%), Kansas (16%) and Oklahoma (12%).
Traditional Life Insurance
We offer traditional participating whole life insurance products. Participating whole life
insurance provides benefits for the life of the insured. It provides level premiums and a level
death benefit and requires payments in excess of mortality charges in early years to offset
increasing mortality costs in later years. Under the terms of these policies, policyholders have a
right to participate in our surplus to the extent determined by the Board of Directors, generally
through annual dividends. Participating business accounted for 41% of direct life receipts from
policyholders during 2008 and represented 13% of life insurance in force at December 31, 2008.
We also market non-participating term insurance policies that provide life insurance protection for
a specified period. Term insurance is mortality based and generally has no accumulation values.
However, beginning in 2007, we introduced the return of premium rider, which returns a percentage
of premiums after a set number of years. For a portion of our business, we may change the premium
scales at any time but may not increase rates above guaranteed levels.
Universal Life Insurance
Our universal life policies provide permanent life insurance protection with a flexible or fixed
premium structure which allows the customer to pre-fund future insurance costs and accumulate
savings on a tax-deferred basis. Premiums received, less policy assessments for administration
expenses and mortality costs, are credited to the policyholders account balance. Interest is
credited to the cash value at rates that we periodically set.
15
Underwriting
We follow formal underwriting standards and procedures designed to properly assess and quantify
life insurance risks before issuing policies to individuals. To implement these procedures, we
employ a professional underwriting staff of 12 underwriters who have an average of 25 years of
experience in the insurance industry. Our underwriters review each applicants written
application, which is prepared under the supervision of our agents, and any required medical
records. We generally employ blood and urine testing (including HIV antibody testing) to provide
additional information whenever the applicant is age 16 or older and the face amount is $100,000 or
greater. Based on the results of these tests, we may adjust the mortality charge or decline
coverage completely. Generally, tobacco use by a life insurance applicant within the preceding
one-year results in a substantially higher mortality charge. In accordance with industry practice,
material misrepresentation on a policy application can result in the cancellation of the policy
upon the return of any premiums paid.
Interest Crediting and Participating Dividend Policy
The interest crediting policy for our direct traditional and universal life insurance products is
the same as for our traditional annuity products in the Exclusive Annuity segment. See Interest
Crediting Policy under the Exclusive Annuity Segment discussion. We pay dividends, credit
interest and determine other nonguaranteed elements on the individual insurance policies depending
on the type of product. Some elements, such as dividends, are generally declared for a year at a
time. Interest rates and other nonguaranteed elements are determined based on experience as it
emerges and with regard to competitive factors. Average contractual credited rates on our direct
universal life contracts were 4.41% in 2008, 4.43% in 2007 and 4.45% in 2006. Our universal life
contracts have guaranteed minimum crediting rates that range from 3.00% to 4.50%, with a weighted
average guaranteed crediting rate of 3.83% at December 31, 2008 and 3.84% at December 31, 2007.
Interest Crediting Rates of Direct Interest Sensitive Life Products Compared to Guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Value at December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
At guaranteed rate |
|
$ |
334,536 |
|
|
$ |
334,475 |
|
Between guaranteed rate and 50 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
40,360 |
|
|
|
40,882 |
|
Between 50 basis points and 100 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
23,326 |
|
|
|
22,613 |
|
Greater than 100 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
237,760 |
|
|
|
230,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
635,982 |
|
|
$ |
628,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the assumed universal life contracts have a guaranteed minimum crediting rate of 4.00% at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Interest Crediting Rates of Assumed Interest Sensitive Life Products Compared to Guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Value at December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
At guaranteed rate |
|
$ |
67,021 |
|
|
$ |
106,199 |
|
Between guaranteed rate and 50 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
9,460 |
|
Between 50 basis points and 100 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
67,689 |
|
|
|
18,786 |
|
Greater than 100 basis points over guarantee |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
135,198 |
|
|
$ |
139,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder dividends are currently being paid and will continue to be paid as declared on
participating policies. Policyholder dividend scales are generally established annually and are
based on the performance of assets supporting these policies, the mortality experience of the
policies and expense levels. Other factors, such as changes in tax law, may be considered as well.
Our participating business does not have minimum guaranteed dividend rates.
16
In Force - Traditional and Universal Life Insurance Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except face amounts in millions) |
|
Number of direct policies traditional
life |
|
|
335,505 |
|
|
|
332,497 |
|
|
|
328,152 |
|
Number of direct policies universal life |
|
|
55,094 |
|
|
|
55,218 |
|
|
|
56,673 |
|
Direct face amounts traditional life |
|
$ |
30,998 |
|
|
$ |
28,552 |
|
|
$ |
25,993 |
|
Direct face amounts universal life |
|
|
4,817 |
|
|
|
4,695 |
|
|
|
4,675 |
|
Direct interest sensitive reserves |
|
|
634,963 |
|
|
|
628,563 |
|
|
|
625,541 |
|
Direct other insurance reserves |
|
|
1,389,546 |
|
|
|
1,349,141 |
|
|
|
1,306,987 |
|
Assumed insurance reserves |
|
|
202,829 |
|
|
|
190,741 |
|
|
|
199,020 |
|
Variable Segment
We sell several variable products through our exclusive agency force. In addition, we receive
variable business through our unique EquiTrust Life variable product alliances. The Variable
segment consists of variable universal life insurance and variable annuity contracts. These
products are similar to universal life insurance and traditional annuity contracts, except the
contract holder has the option to direct the cash value of the contract to a wide range of
investment sub-accounts, thereby passing the investment risk to the contract holder.
Premiums Collected Variable Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Variable annuities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive distribution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First year |
|
$ |
40,742 |
|
|
$ |
65,840 |
|
|
$ |
50,911 |
|
Renewal |
|
|
23,047 |
|
|
|
26,377 |
|
|
|
23,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
63,789 |
|
|
|
92,217 |
|
|
|
74,867 |
|
Alliance channel: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First year (1) |
|
|
15,685 |
|
|
|
30,430 |
|
|
|
22,382 |
|
Renewal (1) |
|
|
4,417 |
|
|
|
5,028 |
|
|
|
3,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
20,102 |
|
|
|
35,458 |
|
|
|
26,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable annuities |
|
|
83,891 |
|
|
|
127,675 |
|
|
|
100,973 |
|
Variable universal life: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive distribution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First year |
|
|
4,930 |
|
|
|
5,557 |
|
|
|
6,451 |
|
Renewal |
|
|
46,274 |
|
|
|
46,052 |
|
|
|
44,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
51,204 |
|
|
|
51,609 |
|
|
|
51,405 |
|
Alliance channel: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First year (1) |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
Renewal (1) |
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable universal life |
|
|
53,816 |
|
|
|
54,490 |
|
|
|
54,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Variable |
|
|
137,707 |
|
|
|
182,165 |
|
|
|
155,206 |
|
Reinsurance ceded |
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
|
(856 |
) |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Variable, net of reinsurance |
|
$ |
136,971 |
|
|
$ |
181,309 |
|
|
$ |
154,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are net of portion ceded to and include amounts assumed from alliance partners. |
Variable sales tend to vary with the volatility, performance of and confidence level in the equity
markets as well as crediting and interest rates on competing products, including fixed rate
annuities and bank-offered certificates of deposit. The S&P 500 Index decreased 38.5% in 2008, and
increased 3.5% in 2007 and 13.6% in 2006. Variable premiums collected in our Farm Bureau market
territory are concentrated primarily in the following states for 2008: Iowa (35%), Kansas (11%)
and Minnesota (10%).
17
Variable Universal Life Insurance
We offer variable universal life policies that are similar in design to universal life policies,
but the policyholder has the ability to direct the cash value of the policy to an assortment of
variable sub-accounts and, in turn, assumes the investment risk passed through by those funds.
Policyholders can select from variable sub-accounts managed by us as well as sub-accounts that are
managed by outside investment advisors. Variable universal life policyholders can also elect a
declared interest option under which the cash values are credited with interest as declared. See
Variable Sub-Accounts and Mutual Funds.
Variable Annuities
For variable annuities, policyholders have the right to direct the cash value of the policy into an
assortment of sub-accounts, thereby assuming the investment risk passed through by those
sub-accounts. The sub-account options for variable annuity contracts are the same as those
available for variable universal life policies. In addition, variable annuity contract holders can
also elect a declared interest option under which the cash values are credited with interest as
declared.
Our variable annuity products have a guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) rider. The variable
annuity products issued by Farm Bureau Life after September 1, 2002 and those issued or assumed by
EquiTrust Life generally have a high water mark feature that pays the contract holder the greatest
value attained on any anniversary date or the date of a payment or withdrawal. For our variable
annuity contracts issued by Farm Bureau Life prior to September 1, 2002, the GMDB is equal to the
amount by which premiums less partial withdrawals exceeds the account value on the date of death.
In addition, certain of our variable annuity products have an incremental death benefit (IDB) rider
that pays a percentage of the gain on the contract upon the death of the contract holder. Our
exposure to GMDBs and IDBs, the amount considered in the money, is $152.3 million at December 31,
2008. The reserve for these benefits is determined using scenario-based modeling techniques and
industry mortality assumptions. The related reserve recorded at December 31, 2008 totaled $1.4
million. At Farm Bureau Life, we began issuing variable annuity contracts with guaranteed minimum
income benefits (GMIB) on June 1, 2008. Under this optional GMIB rider, upon annuitization after
the eighth policy year to a single or joint life income option, the contract holder receives
monthly income of the higher of the current accumulated value applied to a current payment option,
or a guaranteed payment option applied to the premiums paid minus withdrawals accumulated at a
specified rate. There is a minimum of eight years before this GMIB benefit may be taken.
Underwriting
Our underwriting standards for direct variable life products are the same as our standards for our
traditional and universal life insurance products. See Underwriting under the Traditional and
Universal Life Insurance segment discussion.
In Force Variable Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except face amounts in millions) |
|
Number of direct contracts variable annuity |
|
|
20,624 |
|
|
|
21,041 |
|
|
|
20,763 |
|
Number of direct policies variable
universal life |
|
|
61,319 |
|
|
|
63,378 |
|
|
|
64,502 |
|
Direct face amounts variable universal life |
|
$ |
7,698 |
|
|
$ |
7,846 |
|
|
$ |
7,704 |
|
Separate account assets |
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
862,738 |
|
|
|
764,377 |
|
Interest sensitive reserves |
|
|
225,539 |
|
|
|
202,211 |
|
|
|
206,445 |
|
Other insurance reserves |
|
|
30,382 |
|
|
|
27,074 |
|
|
|
30,898 |
|
Corporate and Other Segment
The Corporate and Other segment includes (i) advisory services for the management of investments
and companies; (ii) marketing and distribution services for the sale of mutual funds and insurance
products not issued by us; (iii) leasing services, primarily with affiliates; (iv) a small block of
closed accident and health business; (v) interest expense and; (vi) investments and related
investment income not specifically allocated to our product segments.
18
Reinsurance
We reinsure a portion of our life insurance exposure with unaffiliated insurance companies under
traditional indemnity reinsurance agreements. New sales of participating whole life and universal
life products are reinsured above prescribed limits and do not require the reinsurers prior
approval within certain guidelines. New sales of certain term life products are reinsured on a
first dollar quota share basis and do not require the reinsurers prior approval within various
guidelines. We do not use financial or surplus relief reinsurance. Generally, we enter into
indemnity reinsurance arrangements to assist in diversifying our risks and to limit our maximum
loss on risks that exceed our policy retention limits. Our maximum retention limit on an insured
life ranges up to $1.1 million depending on when the policy was issued.
In addition, we have reinsurance agreements with variable alliance partners to cede a specified
percentage of risks associated with variable universal life and variable annuity contracts. Under
these agreements, we pay the alliance partners their reinsurance percentage of charges and
deductions collected on the reinsured policies. The alliance partners in return pay us their
reinsurance percentage of benefits in excess of related account balances. In addition, the
alliance partners pay us an expense allowance for new business and development and maintenance
costs on the reinsured contracts.
Reinsurance contracts do not fully discharge our obligation to pay claims on the reinsured
business. As the ceding insurer, we remain responsible for policy claims to the extent the
reinsurer fails to pay claims. No reinsurer of business ceded by us has failed to pay any material
policy claims (either individually or in the aggregate) with respect to our ceded business. We
continually evaluate the financial strength of our reinsurers and monitor concentrations of credit
risk. If for any reason reinsurance coverages would need to be replaced, we believe that
replacement coverages from financially responsible reinsurers would be available.
Primary Reinsurers as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.M. Best |
|
Amount of |
|
Reinsurer |
|
Rating |
|
In Force Ceded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
millions) |
|
RGA Reinsurance Company |
|
|
A+ |
|
$ |
2,643.8 |
|
Generali USA Life Reassurance Company |
|
|
A |
|
|
2,249.1 |
|
Swiss Re Life & Health America Inc. |
|
|
A+ |
|
|
2,540.9 |
|
Employers Reassurance Corporation |
|
|
A- |
|
|
616.4 |
|
Scottish Re* |
|
|
D/E |
|
|
567.2 |
|
Munich American Reassurance Company |
|
|
A+ |
|
|
261.5 |
|
All other (9 reinsurers) |
|
A- to A++ |
|
|
265.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,144.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
New business with Scottish Re was terminated in early 2007, following difficulties at that
company and related ratings downgrades. Scottish Re continues to meet its reinsurance
obligation with us in a normal fashion. |
We participate in a reinsurance pool with various unaffiliated life insurance companies to mitigate
the impact of a catastrophic event on our financial position and results of operations. Members of
the pool share in the eligible catastrophic losses based on their size and contribution to the
pool. Under the pool arrangement, we will be able to cede approximately 64% of catastrophic losses
after other reinsurance and a deductible of $0.9 million. Pool losses are capped at $17.8 million
per event and the maximum loss we could incur as a result of losses assumed from other pool members
is $6.4 million per event.
In addition, Farm Bureau Life has an annual 100% quota share accidental death reinsurance
agreement. Coverage includes all acts of terrorism including those of a nuclear, chemical or
biological origin. Coverage is subject to an annual aggregate retention which, effective January
1, 2009, was increased from $10.0 million to $11.0 million. A maximum occurrence limit of $50.0
million applies to policies written on agents of the company who are participating in
company-sponsored incentive trips. All other occurrence catastrophes are unlimited in amount.
19
Variable Sub-Accounts and Mutual Funds
We sponsor the EquiTrust Series Fund, Inc. (the Series Fund) and EquiTrust Variable Insurance
Series Fund (the Insurance Series Fund) (collectively, the EquiTrust Funds) which are open-end,
diversified series management investment companies. The Series Fund is available to the general
public. The Insurance Series Fund offers its shares, without a sales charge, only to our separate
accounts and to our alliance partners separate accounts as an investment medium for variable
annuity contracts or variable life insurance policies.
The EquiTrust Funds each currently issue shares in six investment series (a Portfolio or
collectively the Portfolios) with the following distinct investment objectives: (1) long-term
capital appreciation by investing in equity securities which have a potential to earn a high return
on capital and/or are undervalued by the marketplace; (2) as high a level of current income as is
consistent with investment in a diversified portfolio of high-grade income-bearing debt securities;
(3) as high a level of current income as is consistent with investment in a diversified portfolio
of lower-rated, higher yielding income-bearing securities; (4) high level of total investment
return through income and capital appreciation by investing in common stocks and other equity
securities, high grade debt securities and high quality short-term money market instruments; (5)
maximum current income consistent with liquidity and stability of principal; and (6) growth of
capital and income by investing primarily in common stocks of well-capitalized, established
companies. The net assets of the EquiTrust Funds at December 31, 2008 totaled $425.0 million.
EquiTrust Investment Management Services, Inc. (the Advisor), a subsidiary, receives an annual
management fee based on the average daily net assets of each EquiTrust Portfolio that ranges from
0.25% to 0.60% for the Series Fund and from 0.20% to 0.45% for the Variable Insurance Series Fund.
In addition, the Advisor receives a 0.05% accounting fee not to exceed $30,000 per portfolio.
EquiTrust Marketing Services, LLC (EquiTrust Marketing), a subsidiary, serves as distributor and
principal underwriter for the EquiTrust Funds. EquiTrust Marketing receives from the Series Fund a
front-end load fee ranging from 0% to 5.75% for Class A share sales, an annual distribution
services fee of 0.25% for Class A shares and 0.50% for Class B shares, a 0.25% annual
administration services fee for Class A and B shares and a contingent deferred sales charge paid on
the early redemption of Class B shares. EquiTrust Marketing also serves as the principal dealer
for the Series Fund and receives commissions and fees.
Our variable products include sub-accounts that invest in funds managed by outside investment
advisors in addition to the Insurance Series Fund. We receive an annual administrative service fee
ranging from 0.05% to 0.25% (annualized) of the sub-account values, generally once the sub-accounts
meet a predetermined asset threshold. The outside investment advisors and related sub-accounts
available to our variable contract holders include Fidelity Management & Research Company (13
sub-accounts), Franklin Advisers, Inc. (10 sub-accounts), T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (9
sub-accounts), Calvert Investments, previously Summit Investment Partners, Inc., (7 sub-accounts),
JP Morgan Investment Management Inc. (6 sub-accounts), American Century Investment Management
Services, Inc. (5 sub-accounts), Dreyfus Corporation (5 sub-accounts), Columbia Management (4
sub-accounts) and DWS Scudder Investments (2 sub-accounts).
We also sponsor a money market fund, EquiTrust Money Market Fund, Inc. (Money Market Fund), which
is a no-load open-end diversified management investment company with an investment objective of
maximum current income consistent with liquidity and stability of principal. The net assets of the
Money Market Fund were $16.5 million at December 31, 2008.
EquiTrust Series Fund, Inc. and EquiTrust Money Market Fund, Inc. are offered through registered
representatives of EquiTrust Marketing, the principal underwriter. For more complete information
including fees, charges and other expenses, obtain a prospectus from EquiTrust Marketing Services,
LLC, 5400 University Avenue, West Des Moines, Iowa 50266. Please read the prospectus before you
invest.
20
Ratings and Competition
Financial strength ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of
insurance companies. Insurer financial strength ratings represent the opinions of rating agencies
regarding the ability of an insurance company to meet its financial obligations to policyholders
and contract holders. Credit ratings represent the opinions of rating agencies regarding an
issuers ability to repay its indebtedness.
All of our ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time
by the rating agencies, and therefore, no assurance can be given
that these ratings will be maintained. Our insurer financial strength
ratings and credit ratings as of the date of this filing are listed
in the table below:
Insurer Financial Strength Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating |
|
Source |
|
Outlook |
Farm Bureau Life Insurance
Company
|
|
A- (Excellent)
|
|
A.M. Best
|
|
Negative |
EquiTrust Life Insurance Company
|
|
A- (Excellent)
|
|
A.M. Best
|
|
Negative |
Farm Bureau Life Insurance
Company
|
|
A (Strong)
|
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
CreditWatch Negative |
EquiTrust Life Insurance Company
|
|
A (Strong)
|
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
CreditWatch Negative |
Credit Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating |
|
Source |
|
Outlook |
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
bbb-
|
|
A.M. Best
|
|
Negative |
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
BBB
|
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
Negative |
A.M. Best Company, Inc. (A.M. Best) has 13 ratings assigned to solvent insurance companies, which
currently range from A++(Superior) to D(Poor). Standard & Poors has eight financial strength
ratings assigned to solvent insurance companies, ranging from AAA(Extremely Strong) to
CC(Extremely Weak).
A.M. Bests long-term credit ratings range from aaa (exceptional) to d (in default). A + or
- may be appended to ratings from aa to ccc to indicate relative position within a category.
A rating of bbb- is considered investment grade. Standard & Poors long-term credit ratings
range from AAA (extremely strong) to D (payment default). A rating of BBB is considered
investment grade.
We operate in a highly competitive industry. Insurers compete based primarily upon price, service
level and the financial strength of the company. The operating results of companies in the
insurance industry historically have been subject to significant fluctuations due to competition,
economic conditions, interest rates, investment performance, maintenance of insurance ratings from
rating agencies and other factors. We believe our ability to compete with other insurance
companies is dependent upon, among other things, our ability to attract and retain agents to market
our insurance products, our ability to develop competitive and profitable products and our ability
to maintain high ratings from A.M. Best and Standard & Poors. In connection with the development
and sale of our products, we encounter significant competition from other insurance companies, and
other financial institutions, such as banks and broker/dealers, many of which have financial
resources substantially greater than ours.
Regulation
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to government regulation in each of the states in which they
conduct business. This regulatory authority is vested in state agencies having broad
administrative power dealing with all aspects of the insurance business, including rates, policy
forms and capital adequacy, and is concerned primarily with the protection of policyholders rather
than stockholders. Our variable insurance products, mutual funds, investment advisor,
broker/dealer and certain licensed agents are also subject to regulation by the SEC, FINRA and
state agencies.
In 2008 the SEC approved its Rule 151A, which will change the federal law status of index annuities
from insurance products to registered securities products. Various organizations within the life
insurance industry are challenging this SEC action and are attempting to overturn this rule.
Assuming this rule is enacted, its effective date is expected to be January 12, 2011. At that time,
index annuities will be considered a type of security and all agents selling index annuities will
be required to be registered representatives affiliated with a licensed broker dealer. As a result
of this rule, we may incur increased costs and decreased production for our index annuities with
possible product design and compensation limitations. Index annuities are important to our
business; however we also offer a wide variety of life insurance and annuity products and have
experience with registered investment products.
21
The insurance regulatory framework has been under examination, and certain state legislatures have
considered or enacted laws that alter, and in many cases increase, state authority to regulate
insurance companies and insurance holding company systems. Legislation has been introduced in
Congress in the past which could result in the federal government assuming regulation of the
insurance industry. In light of ongoing legislative developments, the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and state insurance regulators continue to reexamine existing laws
and regulations, accounting policies and procedures, specifically focusing on insurance company
investments and solvency issues, market conduct, risk-adjusted capital guidelines, interpretations
of existing laws, the development of new laws, the implementation of non-statutory guidelines and
the circumstances under which dividends may be paid. We do not believe the adoption of any of the
current NAIC initiatives will have a material adverse impact on us; however, we cannot predict the
form of any future proposals or regulation.
Employees
At December 31, 2008, we had 1,866 employees. A majority of our employees, including the executive
officers, also provide services to Farm Bureau Mutual and other affiliates pursuant to management
agreements. None of our employees are members of a collective bargaining unit.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risk Factors
The performance of our company is subject to a variety of risks which you should review.
Occurrence of these risks could materially affect our business, results of operations or financial
condition, cause the trading price of our Common Stock to decline materially or cause our actual
results to differ materially from those expected or those expressed in any forward looking
statements made by or on behalf of the Company.
Current difficult conditions in the financial markets and the economy may materially adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
Our results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the financial markets and the
economy generally. The stress experienced by financial markets that began in the second half of
2007 continued and substantially increased during 2008. The volatility and disruption in the
financial markets have reached unprecedented levels. The availability and cost of credit has been
materially affected. These factors, combined with volatile oil prices, depressed home prices and
increasing foreclosures, falling equity market values, declining business and consumer confidence
and the risks of increased inflation and unemployment, have precipitated an economic slowdown and
severe recession.
The fixed-income markets are experiencing a period of both extreme volatility and limited market
liquidity, which has affected a broad range of asset classes and sectors. In addition, there have
been credit downgrade events and an increased probability of default for many fixed income
instruments. Equity markets have also been experiencing heightened volatility. These events and
the continuing market upheavals have had and may continue to have an adverse effect on us. Our
revenues may decline in such circumstances, the cost of meeting our obligations to our customers
may increase, and our profit margins could erode. In addition, in the event of a prolonged
economic downturn, we could incur additional significant losses in our investment portfolio.
The demand for our products could be adversely affected in an economic downturn characterized by
higher unemployment, lower family income, lower consumer spending, lower corporate earnings and
lower business investment. We also may experience a higher incidence of claims, lapses or
surrenders of policies. Our policyholders may choose to defer or stop paying insurance premiums.
We cannot predict whether or when such actions may occur, or what impact, if any, such actions
could have on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
22
Continuing adverse financial market conditions may significantly affect our liquidity, access to
capital and cost of capital.
As described in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section in Item 7 of this Form 10-K, our life
insurance subsidiaries have historically generated positive cash flow as measured by the degree to
which cash inflows are adequate to meet benefit obligations to policyholders and normal operating
expenses as they are incurred. While our life insurance subsidiaries have historically generated
positive cash flow, a significant increase in policyholder benefits, including withdrawals and
surrenders of life insurance and annuity contracts, could require us to sell fixed maturity
securities that are currently in an unrealized loss position. Such sales would result in a charge
to income and a reduction in capital. At December 31, 2008, we believe the probability we would
have to sell investments in an unrealized loss position to meet cash flow needs is remote. See the
Financial Condition section in Item 7 for details regarding the unrealized loss position on our
fixed maturity securities.
Capital requirements depend on factors including accumulated statutory earnings of our life
insurance subsidiaries, statutory capital and surplus of our life insurance subsidiaries, the rate
of sales growth of our products, aggregate reserve levels and the levels of credit risk and/or
interest rate risk in our invested assets. In order to support these capital requirements, we may
need to increase or maintain the statutory capital and surplus of our life insurance subsidiaries
through additional financings, which could include debt, equity or other transactions.
Adverse capital market conditions have affected and may continue to affect the availability and
cost of borrowed funds and could impact our ability to refinance existing borrowings, thereby
ultimately impacting our profitability and ability to support or grow our businesses. Without
sufficient capital, we could be forced to curtail certain of our operations, and our business could
suffer. Actions we might take to access financing may in turn cause rating agencies to reevaluate
our ratings.
We manage the amount of our capital to be consistent with an A indicative ratings level from
Standard & Poors and A.M. Best. As of December 31, 2008, we estimate that we have sufficient
capital in the life insurance subsidiaries, combined with capital at the holding company, to meet
this rating objective. However, this capital may not be sufficient if significant future losses
are incurred and, given the current market conditions, access to additional capital could be
limited.
The Market Value Adjustment (MVA) feature on certain policies may cause surrenders to increase in
an extremely low interest rate environment.
The surrender charge amount on our EquiTrust Life independent channel business may be impacted
positively or negatively by a market value adjustment feature on these products. This adjustment
feature may apply if the withdrawal amount exceeds the free withdrawal provision or the contract is
surrendered during the surrender charge period. The adjustment is determined by a mathematical
formula which measures changes in the interest rate environment since the contract was issued based
on U.S. Treasury rates. This feature provides us interest rate protection when U.S. Treasury
interest rates are greater than the rates in effect when a contract is issued and provides a
benefit to contract holders when U.S Treasury interest rates are less than the rates in effect when
a contract is issued. Market conditions with low U.S. Treasury yields provide an environment where
contract holders may be able to surrender with smaller net surrender charges.
The unprecedented low U.S. Treasury yields late in 2008 and continuing into early 2009 provided an
environment where contract holders were able to surrender with smaller net surrender charges,
increasing the level of surrender activity. At the same time, credit spreads were increased and a
majority or our fixed maturity securities were in an unrealized loss position.
We have initiated conservation efforts to reduce the surrender activity for existing contracts and
are evaluating the terms and conditions for future products. In addition, the surrender charge
protection has increased since year end with the increase in U.S. Treasury rates from the historic
lows experienced at the end of 2008. However, the increase in surrenders, combined with the
reduction in sales to preserve capital, may cause EquiTrust Life to incur losses and have net
negative cash outflows in 2009. We anticipate using cash on hand and, to the extent necessary,
proceeds from investment sales of fixed maturity securities in an unrealized gain position to meet
these needs. We cannot predict the extent to which increased surrender activity will continue or
what impact such excess surrenders could have on our business, results of operations, cash flows
and financial condition.
23
Our valuation of fixed maturity securities may include methodologies, estimations and assumptions
that are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations
that may materially adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
During periods of market disruption, such as the unprecedented current market conditions, it may be
difficult to value certain of our securities if trading becomes less frequent and/or market data
becomes less observable. There may be certain asset classes that were in active markets with
significant observable data that become illiquid due to the current financial environment or market
conditions. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or
require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods which are more complex. These
values may not be ultimately realizable in a market transaction, and such values may change very
rapidly as market conditions change and valuation assumptions are modified. Decreases in value may
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
The decision on whether to record an other-than-temporary impairment is determined in part by our
assessment of the financial condition and prospects of a particular issuer, projections of future
cash flows and recoverability of the particular security as well as an evaluation of our ability
and intent to hold the securities to recovery. Our conclusions regarding the recoverability of a
particular securitys market price may ultimately prove to be incorrect as facts and circumstances
change.
Our investment portfolio is subject to credit quality risks which may diminish the value of our
invested assets and affect our profitability and reported book value per share.
We are subject to the risk that the issuers of fixed maturity securities and other debt securities
in our portfolio (other than U.S. agency securities), and borrowers on our commercial mortgages,
will default on principal and interest payments, particularly in the event of a major downturn in
economic activity. As of December 31, 2008, we held $9.0 billion of fixed income securities, $0.3
billion of which represented below-investment grade holdings. Of these $0.3 billion of
below-investment grade holdings, 88.6% were acquired as investment grade holdings but, as of
December 31, 2008, had been downgraded to below investment grade. An increase in defaults on our
fixed maturity securities and commercial mortgage loan portfolios could harm our financial strength
and reduce our profitability.
We use derivative instruments to fund the credits on our index annuities. We purchase derivative
instruments from a number of counterparties directly and assume derivatives through a coinsurance
agreement. If our counterparties fail to honor their obligations under the derivative instruments,
we will have failed to obtain funds for crediting appreciation in the applicable indices to
contract holders. Any such failure could harm our financial strength and reduce our profitability.
We have entered into two interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $100.0 million to
manage interest rate risk on a portion of our flexible premium deferred annuity contracts. We also
have one interest rate swap with a $46.0 million notional amount to hedge the variable component of
the interest rate on a portion of our line of credit borrowings. We purchased these instruments
from three different counterparties. If these counterparties fail to honor their obligations, we
will have additional exposure to an increase in interest rates, which could harm our financial
strength and reduce our profitability.
Changing interest rates, market volatility and general economic conditions affect the risks and the
returns on both our products and our investment portfolio.
The market value of our investments and our investment performance, including yields and
realization of gains or losses, may vary depending on economic and market conditions. Such
conditions include the shape of the yield curve, level of interest rates and recognized equity and
bond indices. Interest rate risk is our primary market risk exposure. Substantial and sustained
changes in market interest rates can materially affect the profitability of our products, the
market value of our investments and the reported value of stockholders equity.
A key component of our net income (loss) is the investment spread. A narrowing of investment
spreads would adversely affect operating results. Although we have the right to adjust interest
crediting rates on a substantial portion of our direct business in force, changes to crediting
rates may not be sufficient to maintain targeted investment spreads in all economic and market
environments. In general, our ability to lower crediting rates is subject to a minimum crediting
rate filed with and approved by state regulators. In addition, competition and other
24
factors,
including the potential for increases in surrenders and withdrawals, may limit our ability to
adjust or maintain crediting rates at levels necessary to avoid the narrowing of spreads under
certain market conditions.
The profitability of our index annuities that are tied to market indices is significantly affected
by the interest earned on investments, by the cost of underlying call options purchased to fund the
credits owed to contract holders and by the minimum interest guarantees owed to the contract
holder, if any. If there were little or no gains on the call options purchased over the expected
life of an index annuity, we would incur expenses for credited interest over and above our option
costs. In addition, if we are not successful in matching the terms of call options purchased with
the terms of the index annuities, index credits could exceed call option proceeds. These items
would cause our spreads to tighten and reduce our profits.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Market
Risks of Financial Instruments for further discussion of our interest rate risk exposure and
information regarding our asset-liability and hedging programs to help mitigate our exposure to
interest rate risk.
We face competition from companies having greater financial resources, more advanced technology
systems, broader arrays of products, higher ratings and stronger financial performance, which may
impair our ability to retain existing customers, attract new customers and maintain our
profitability and financial strength.
See Item 1. Business Ratings and Competition for information regarding risks relating to
competition.
As a holding company, we depend on our subsidiaries for funds to meet our obligations, but our
subsidiaries ability to make distributions to us is limited by law, and could be affected by
risk-based capital computations.
As a holding company, we rely on dividends from subsidiaries to assist in meeting our obligations.
The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or to make other cash payments in the future may
materially affect our ability to satisfy our parent company payment obligations, including debt
service and dividends on our common stock.
The ability of our subsidiaries, Farm Bureau Life and EquiTrust Life, to pay dividends to the
parent company is limited by law to earned profits (statutory unassigned surplus) as of the date
the dividend is paid, as determined in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by insurance
regulatory authorities of the State of Iowa. The annual dividend limitation is defined under the
Iowa Insurance Holding Company Act as any dividend or distribution of cash or other property whose
fair value, together with that of other dividends or distributions made within the preceding 12
months, exceeds the greater of (i) 10% of adjusted policyholders surplus (total statutory capital
stock and statutory surplus less certain admitted deferred tax assets) as of December 31 of the
preceding year, or (ii) the statutory net gain from operations of the insurer for the 12-month
period ending December 31 of the preceding year. During 2009, the maximum amount legally available
for distribution to FBL Financial Group, Inc., without further regulatory approval, from Farm
Bureau Life is $38.2 million. EquiTrust Life cannot pay a dividend without regulatory approval in
2009 due to its unassigned surplus position at December 31, 2008. See Note 13 of our consolidated
financial statements for additional details on the dividend limitation.
In addition, the Life Companies are subject to the risk-based capital (RBC) requirement of the NAIC
set forth in the Risk-Based Capital for Insurers Model Act. The main purpose of the Model Act is
to provide a tool for insurance regulators to evaluate the capital of insurers relative to the
risks assumed by them and determine whether there is a need for possible corrective action. U.S.
insurers and reinsurers are required to report the results of their RBC calculations as part of the
statutory annual statements filed with state insurance regulatory authorities.
The Model Act provides for four different levels of regulatory actions based on annual statements,
each of which may be triggered if an insurers total adjusted capital, as defined in the Model Act,
is less than a corresponding RBC.
|
|
|
The company action level is triggered if an insurers total adjusted capital is less
than 200% of its authorized control level RBC, as defined in the Model Act. At the company
action level, the insurer must submit a plan to the regulatory authority that discusses
proposed corrective actions to improve its capital position. |
25
|
|
|
The regulatory action level is triggered if an insurers total adjusted capital is less
than 150% of its authorized control level RBC. At the regulatory action level, the
regulatory authority will perform a special examination of the insurer and issue an order
specifying corrective actions that must be followed. |
|
|
|
|
If an insurers total adjusted capital is less than its authorized control level RBC,
the regulatory authority is authorized (although not mandated) to take regulatory control
of the insurer. |
|
|
|
|
The mandatory control level is triggered if an insurers total adjusted capital is less
than 70% of its authorized control level RBC, and at that level the regulatory authority
must take regulatory control of the insurer. Regulatory control may lead to rehabilitation
or liquidation of an insurer. |
Failure to maintain adequate capital levels could lead to ratings downgrades and liquidity issues
which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
A significant ratings downgrade may have a material adverse effect on our business.
Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies.
If our ratings were lowered significantly, our ability to market products to new customers could be
harmed and existing policyholders might cancel their policies or withdraw the cash values of their
policies. These events, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our net income (loss) and
liquidity. A decline in ratings could also violate the covenants of our $60.0 million line of
credit and negatively affect the availability and cost of capital of borrowed funds. Our ratings
reflect the agencies opinions as to the financial strength, operating performance and ability to
meet obligations to policyholders of our insurance company subsidiaries. There is no assurance
that a credit rating will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not
be reduced, suspended or withdrawn entirely by the applicable rating agency, if in the rating
agencys judgment, circumstances so warrant. See Item 1. Business Ratings and Competition for
a summary of our current ratings.
All segments of our business are highly regulated and these regulations or changes in them could
affect our profitability.
We are subject to regulation under applicable insurance statutes, including insurance holding
company statutes, in the various states in which our life subsidiaries operate. Insurance
regulation is intended to provide safeguards for policyholders rather than to protect shareholders
of insurance companies or their holding companies. Regulators oversee matters relating to sales
practices, policy forms, claims practices, guaranty funds, types and amounts of investments,
reserve adequacy, insurer solvency, minimum amounts of capital and surplus, transactions with
related parties, changes in control and payment of dividends.
State insurance regulators and the NAIC continually reexamine existing laws and regulations, and
may impose changes in the future.
As noted above, our life subsidiaries are subject to the NAICs RBC requirements which are used by
insurance regulators as an early warning tool to identify deteriorating or weakly capitalized
insurance companies for the purpose of initiating regulatory action. Our life subsidiaries also
may be required, under solvency or guaranty laws of most states in which they do business, to pay
assessments up to certain prescribed limits to fund policyholder losses or liabilities of other
insolvent insurance companies.
Although the federal government does not directly regulate the insurance business, federal
legislation and administrative policies in several areas, including pension regulation, age and sex
discrimination, financial services regulation, securities regulation and federal taxation, can
significantly affect the insurance business. As increased scrutiny has been placed upon the
insurance regulatory framework, a number of state legislatures have considered or enacted
legislative proposals that alter, and in many cases increase, state authority to regulate insurance
companies and holding company systems. Legislation has been introduced in Congress in the past
which could result in the federal government assuming some role in the regulation of the insurance
industry. The regulatory framework at the state and federal level applicable to our insurance
products is evolving and could affect the design of such products and our ability to sell certain
products. Any changes in these laws and regulations could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
26
In 2008 the SEC approved its Rule 151A, which will change the federal law status of index annuities
from insurance products to registered securities products. Various organizations within the life
insurance industry are challenging this SEC action and are attempting to overturn this rule.
Assuming this rule is enacted, its effective date is expected to be January 12, 2011. At that
time, index annuities will be considered a type of security and all agents selling index annuities
will be required to be registered representatives affiliated with a licensed broker dealer. As a
result of this rule, we may incur increased costs and decreased production for our index annuities
with possible product design and compensation limitations. Index annuities are important to our
business; however we also offer a wide variety of life insurance and annuity products and have
experience with registered investment products.
In addition, our investment management subsidiary is a federally registered investment adviser with
the SEC. This subsidiary also manages investment companies (mutual funds) that are registered
under the Investment Company Act, which places additional restrictions on its managers. Moreover,
our separate accounts are registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act. The
investment companies we advise and our registered separate accounts are themselves highly regulated
under the Investment Company Act. In addition, our broker/dealer subsidiary that distributes the
shares of our managed investment companies separate accounts is a broker/dealer registered with
the SEC and is subject to regulation under the Exchange Act and various state laws, and is a member
of, and subject to regulation by, FINRA. The registered representatives of our broker/dealer
subsidiary and of other broker/dealers who distribute our securities products are regulated by the
SEC and FINRA and are further subject to applicable state laws. We cannot predict the effect that
any proposed or future legislation or rule making by the SEC, FINRA or the states will have on our
financial condition or operational flexibility.
Inaccuracies in assumptions regarding future persistency, mortality and interest rates used in
calculating reserve, deferred policy acquisition expense and deferred sales inducement amounts and
pricing our products could have a material adverse impact on our net income (loss).
The process of calculating reserve, deferred policy acquisition expense and deferred sales
inducement amounts and pricing products for an insurance organization involves the use of a number
of assumptions including those related to persistency (how long a contract stays with the company),
mortality (the relative incidence of death in a given time or place) and interest rates (the rates
expected to be paid or received on financial instruments, including insurance or investment
contracts). Actual results could differ significantly from those assumed. Inaccuracies in one or
more of these assumptions could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.
We may be required to accelerate the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs or deferred
sales inducements, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
Deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements (collectively, DAC), represent the
costs that vary with and are related primarily to the acquisition of new and renewal insurance and
annuity contracts, and we amortize these costs over the expected lives of the contracts. We test
the DAC recorded on our consolidated balance sheet to determine if these amounts are recoverable
under current assumptions. In addition, we regularly review the estimates and assumptions
underlying DAC for those products for which we amortize DAC in proportion to gross profits. Given
changes in facts and circumstances, these tests and reviews could lead to reductions in DAC that
could have an adverse effect on the results of our operations and our financial condition.
Increases in actual or expected future withdrawals or surrenders and investment losses, which are
more likely in a severe economic recession, will result in an acceleration of DAC amortization. In
addition, significant or sustained equity and bond market declines could result in an acceleration
of DAC amortization related to variable annuity and variable universal life contracts.
Our earnings are influenced by our claims experience, which is difficult to estimate. If our
future claims experience does not match our pricing assumptions or past results, our earnings could
be materially adversely affected.
Our earnings are significantly influenced by the claims paid under our insurance contracts and will
vary from period to period depending upon the amount of claims incurred. There is only limited
predictability of claims experience within any given quarter or year. The liability that we have
established for future insurance and annuity policy benefits is based on assumptions concerning a
number of factors, including interest rates, expected claims,
27
persistency and expenses. In the
event our future experience does not match our pricing assumptions or our past results, our
operating results could be materially adversely affected.
We assumed a significant amount of closed block business through coinsurance agreements and have
only a limited ability to manage this business.
We have assumed through coinsurance agreements a substantial block of annuity business written by
American Equity and certain traditional life, universal life and annuity business written by EMCNL.
Our ability to manage the products covered by the coinsurance arrangements is limited and we can
make no assurances that our coinsurance counterparties will make decisions regarding the operations
of the business covered by the coinsurance agreements in the same manner that we would or in a
manner that would have a positive impact on the business covered by the coinsurance arrangements.
In addition, we rely on American Equity and EMCNL to supply us with accurate financial and
accounting data relating to the business coinsured.
Our reinsurance program involves risks because we remain liable with respect to the liabilities
ceded to reinsurers if the reinsurers fail to meet the obligations assumed by them.
We reinsure a portion of our life insurance exposure with unaffiliated insurance companies under
traditional indemnity reinsurance agreements. New sales of participating whole life and universal
life products are reinsured above prescribed limits and do not require the reinsurers prior
approval within certain guidelines. New sales of certain term life products are reinsured on a
first dollar quota share basis and do not require the reinsurers prior approval within various
guidelines. Generally, we enter into indemnity reinsurance arrangements to assist in diversifying
our risks and to limit our maximum loss on risks that exceed our policy retention limits. Our
maximum retention limit on an insured life ranges up to $1.1 million depending upon when the policy
was issued.
Indemnity reinsurance does not fully discharge our obligation to pay claims on the reinsured
business. As the ceding insurer, we remain responsible for policy claims to the extent the
reinsurer fails to pay claims. Should any reinsurer fail to meet the obligations assumed under
such reinsurance, we remain liable for these liabilities, and payment of these obligations could
result in losses. To limit the possibility of such losses, we evaluate the financial condition of
our reinsurers and monitor concentrations of credit risk.
Our business is highly dependent on our relationships with Farm Bureau organizations and would be
adversely affected if those relationships became impaired.
Farm Bureau Lifes business relies significantly upon the maintenance of our right to use the Farm
Bureau and FB trade names and related trademarks and service marks which are controlled by the
American Farm Bureau Federation. See discussion under Business Marketing and Distribution
Affiliation with Farm Bureau for information regarding this relationship and circumstances under
which our access to the Farm Bureau membership base and use of the Farm Bureau and FB
designations could be terminated. We believe our relationship with the Farm Bureau provides a
number of advantages. Farm Bureau organizations in our current territory tend to be well known and
long established, have active memberships and provide a number of member benefits other than
financial services. The strength of these organizations provides enhanced prestige and brand
awareness for our products and increased access to Farm Bureau members. The loss of the right to
use these designations in a key state or states could have a material adverse effect upon operating
results.
Our relationship with Farm Bureau organizations could result in conflicts of interests.
Our business and operations are interrelated to a degree with that of the American Farm Bureau
Federation, its affiliates, and state Farm Bureaus. The overlap of the business, including service
of certain common executive officers and directors of the Company and the state Farm Bureau
organizations, may give rise to conflicts of interest among these parties. Conflicts could arise,
for example, with respect to business dealings among the parties, the use of a common agency force,
the sharing of employees, space and other services and facilities under intercompany agreements,
and the allocation of business opportunities between them. Conflicts of interest could also arise
between the Company and the various state Farm Bureau organizations in our life-only states, some
of whose presidents serve as directors of the Company, and which control their state affiliated
property-casualty insurance company, with respect to the use of the common agency force. We have
adopted a conflict of interest policy which requires a director to disclose to the Board of
Directors and any appropriate committee of the Board, the existence of
28
any transaction or proposed
transaction in which the Director has a direct or indirect interest, and the material facts
relating thereto. In addition, a majority of our directors are independent and our Audit and
Compensation and Governance committees are all comprised solely of independent directors.
Changes in federal tax laws may affect sales of our products and profitability.
The annuity and life insurance products that we market generally offer tax advantages to the
policyholders, as compared to other savings instruments such as certificates of deposit and taxable
bonds. Tax preferences include the deferral of income tax on the earnings during the accumulation
period of the annuity or insurance policy as opposed to the current taxation of other savings
instruments and the tax-free status of death benefit proceeds. In addition, life insurance
companies receive a tax deduction for dividends received by separate accounts.
Legislation eliminating this tax deferral and dividends received deduction could have a material
adverse effect on our ability to sell life insurance and annuities. Congress has from time to time
considered legislation which would reduce or eliminate the benefits to policyholders of the
deferral of taxation on the growth of value within certain insurance products or might otherwise
affect the taxation of insurance products and insurance companies relative to other investments.
To the extent that the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, is revised to reduce the
tax-deferred status of insurance products, or to reduce the taxation of competing products, our
financial position and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our ability to maintain competitive costs is dependent upon the level of new sales and persistency
of existing business.
Maintaining competitive costs depends upon numerous factors, including the level of new sales,
persistency of existing business and expense management. A decrease in sales or persistency
without a corresponding reduction in expenses could affect our business and results of operations.
If we are unable to attract and retain agents and develop new distribution sources, sales of our
products and services may be reduced.
We compete to attract and retain exclusive agents for Farm Bureau Life and independent agents for
EquiTrust Life. Intense competition exists for persons and independent distributors with
demonstrated ability. We compete primarily on the basis of our products, compensation, support
services, rating agency ratings and financial position. Sales and our results of operations and
financial condition could be materially adversely affected if we are unsuccessful in attracting and
retaining agents and additional distribution sources for our products.
Attracting and retaining employees who are key to our business is critical to our growth and
success.
The success of our business is dependent, to a large extent, on our ability to attract and retain
key employees. Competition is generally intense in the job market for certain positions, such as
actuaries and other insurance professionals with demonstrated ability, particularly in our
headquarters city of West Des Moines, Iowa, where we compete with other insurance and financial
institutions.
Although we have change in control agreements with members of our management team, we do not have
employment contracts with any of them. In general, our employees are not subject to employment
contracts. Although none of our executive management team has indicated that they intend to
terminate their employment, there can be no certainty regarding the length of time they will remain
with us. Our inability to retain our key employees, or attract and retain additional qualified
employees, could materially adversely affect our sales, results of operations and financial
condition.
Success of our business depends in part on effective information technology systems and on
continuing to develop and implement improvements.
Our business is dependent upon the ability to keep up to date with effective, secure and advanced
technology systems for interacting with employees, agents, policyholders, vendors, agents, third
parties and investors. It is crucial to our business to reach a large number of people, provide
sizeable amounts of information, and secure and store information through our technology systems.
If we do not maintain adequate systems to reflect technological
29
advancements, we could experience
adverse consequences, including inadequate information on which to base pricing, underwriting and
reserving decisions, regulatory problems, litigation exposure or increases in administrative
expenses. This could adversely affect our relationships and ability to do business with our
clients and provide difficulty attracting new customers.
Some of our information technology systems and software are older legacy-type systems and require
an ongoing commitment of resources to maintain current standards. Our business strategy involves
providing customers with easy-to-use products and systems to meet their needs. We are continuously
enhancing and updating our systems to keep pace with changes in information processing technology,
evolving industry and regulatory standards and customer demands. Our success is in large part
dependent on maintaining and enhancing the effectiveness of existing systems, as well as continuing
to develop and enhance information systems that support our business processes in a cost-effective
manner.
In the event of a disaster or catastrophic event, a computer system or information technology
failure could occur and potentially disrupt our business, damage our reputation and adversely
affect our profitability. Disruptions or breaches could occur as a result of natural disasters,
manmade disasters, epidemic/pandemic, industrial accident, blackout, computer virus, criminal
activity, technological changes or events, terrorism, or other unanticipated events beyond our
control. While the company has obtained insurance and has implemented a variety of preventative
security measures such as risk management, disaster recovery and business continuity plans, no
predictions of specific scenarios can be made. Unanticipated problems with our business continuity
systems and plans could have a material adverse impact on our ability to conduct business and on
our results of operations and financial position, particularly if those problems affect our
computer-based processing, transmission, storage and retrieval systems and destroy valuable data.
We experience volatility in net income (loss) due to accounting standards for derivatives.
Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No. 133, as amended, derivative
instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) not designated
as hedges are recognized in the balance sheet at their fair values and changes in fair value are
recognized immediately in earnings. This impacts the items of revenue and expense we report in the
following ways.
|
|
|
We must mark to market the purchased call options we use to fund the index credits on
our index annuities based upon quoted market prices from related counterparties. We record
the change in fair value of these options as a component of our revenues. Included within
the change in fair value of the options is an element reflecting the time value of the
options, which initially is their purchase cost declining to zero at the end of their
lives. The change in the difference between fair value and remaining option cost at
beginning and end of year totaled ($109.7) million in 2008, ($51.1) million in 2007 and
$75.7 million in 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Under Statement No. 133, the future annual index credits on our index annuities are
treated as a series of embedded derivatives over the expected life of the applicable
contracts. We are required to estimate the fair value of these embedded derivatives. Our
estimates of the fair value of these embedded derivatives are based on assumptions related
to underlying policy terms (including annual cap rates, participation rates, asset fees and
minimum guarantees), index values, notional amounts, strike prices and expected lives of
the contracts. The change in fair value of embedded derivatives increases with increases
in volatility in the indices and changes in interest rates. We record the change in fair
value of embedded derivatives as a component of our benefits and expenses. However, it
will not correspond to the change in fair value of the purchased call options because the
purchased options are one or two-year assets while the embedded derivative in the index
contracts represents the rights of the contract holder to receive index credits over the
entire period the index annuities are expected to be in force, which typically exceeds 10
years. Changes in the value of the embedded derivatives included in the index annuity
contracts totaled ($189.4) million in 2008, ($5.9) million in 2007 and $70.3 million in
2006. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps backing our annuity liabilities are
recorded in derivative income (loss) and totaled ($1.4) million in 2008 and ($4.8) million
in 2007. Prior to April 2007, changes in the fair value of these swaps were recorded as a
component of the change in accumulated other |
30
|
|
|
comprehensive income (loss). Amounts recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of March 31, 2007, are being amortized
over the remaining life of the swap. These amounts totaled ($1.1) million in 2008, ($3.8)
million in 2007 and ($1.2) million in 2006. |
|
|
|
We adjust the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales
inducements to reflect the impact of the three items discussed above. |
|
|
|
|
Our earnings are also affected by the changes in the value of the embedded derivatives
in convertible fixed maturity securities and modified coinsurance contracts. Changes in
the value of these embedded derivatives totaled $0 in 2008, less than ($0.1) million in
2007 and ($0.2) million in 2006. |
The application of Statement No. 133 to our derivatives and embedded derivatives may cause
volatility in our results of operations.
We face risks relating to litigation, including the costs of such litigation, management
distraction and the potential for damage awards, which may adversely impact our business.
We are occasionally involved in litigation, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. In addition,
state regulatory bodies, such as state insurance departments, the SEC, FINRA, the Department of
Labor and other regulatory bodies regularly make inquiries and conduct examinations or
investigations concerning our compliance with, among other things, insurance laws, securities laws,
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and laws governing the activities of
broker-dealers. Companies in the life insurance and annuity business have faced litigation,
including class action lawsuits, alleging improper product design, improper sales practices and
similar claims. Moreover, we are subject to the risks of errors and misconduct by our affiliated
agents, such as fraud, non-compliance with policies and recommending transactions that are not
suitable. While we are not a party to any lawsuit that we believe will have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, there can be no assurance
that such litigation, or any future litigation, will not have such an effect, whether financially,
through distraction of our management or otherwise.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our principal operations are conducted from property leased from a subsidiary of the Iowa Farm
Bureau Federation under a 15 year operating lease that expires in 2013. The property leased
currently consists primarily of approximately 182,000 square feet of a 400,000 square foot office
building in West Des Moines, Iowa. Operations related to our EquiTrust Life independent
distribution are conducted from approximately 26,000 square feet of another office building in West
Des Moines, Iowa, which is leased through 2016. We consider the current facilities to be adequate
for the foreseeable future.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. We believe the resolution of
these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
31
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR
ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS |
Stock Market and Dividend Information
The Class A common stock of FBL Financial Group, Inc. is traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol FFG. The following table sets forth the cash dividends per common share and the
high and low prices of FBL Financial Group Class A common stock as reported in the consolidated
transaction reporting system for each quarter of 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock Data (per share) |
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
3rd Qtr. |
|
|
4th Qtr. |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
35.21 |
|
|
$ |
30.05 |
|
|
$ |
34.86 |
|
|
$ |
27.47 |
|
Low |
|
|
26.07 |
|
|
|
17.17 |
|
|
|
18.39 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid |
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
41.53 |
|
|
$ |
40.61 |
|
|
$ |
40.50 |
|
|
$ |
42.50 |
|
Low |
|
|
36.58 |
|
|
|
36.89 |
|
|
|
30.33 |
|
|
|
33.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid |
|
$ |
0.120 |
|
|
$ |
0.120 |
|
|
$ |
0.120 |
|
|
$ |
0.120 |
|
There is no established public trading market for our Class B common stock. As of February 10,
2009, there were approximately 6,600 holders of Class A common stock, including participants
holding securities under the name of a broker (i.e., in street name), and 24 holders of Class B
common stock.
Class B common stockholders receive dividends at the same rate as that declared on Class A common
stock. We intend to declare regular quarterly cash dividends in the future, subject to the
discretion of the Board of Directors, which depends in part upon general business conditions, legal
restrictions and other factors the Board of Directors deems relevant. It is anticipated the
quarterly dividend rate during 2009 will be up to $0.125 per common share.
For restrictions on dividends, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operation Liquidity and Capital Resources and Notes 1 and 13 to the consolidated
financial statements.
32
Comparison of Five-Year Total Return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ending |
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/03 |
|
|
12/31/04 |
|
|
12/31/05 |
|
|
12/31/06 |
|
|
12/31/07 |
|
|
12/31/08 |
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc. |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
112.28 |
|
|
|
$ |
130.91 |
|
|
|
$ |
158.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
141.40 |
|
|
|
$ |
64.97 |
|
|
|
S&P 500 Index |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
110.88 |
|
|
|
|
116.33 |
|
|
|
|
134.70 |
|
|
|
|
142.10 |
|
|
|
|
89.53 |
|
|
|
S&P 500 Life & Health
Insurance Index |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
122.14 |
|
|
|
|
149.65 |
|
|
|
|
174.36 |
|
|
|
|
193.53 |
|
|
|
|
100.02 |
|
|
|
The performance graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return over the past five years of
our Class A common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Life and Health Insurance Index. The
graph plots the changes in value of an initial $100 investment, assuming reinvestment of dividends.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not have any issuer purchases of equity securities for the quarter ended December 31,
2008.
33
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides information about our Class A common stock that may be issued upon the
exercise of options, warrants and rights, or granted as restricted stock, under our existing equity
compensation plans, as of December 31, 2008. These plans include a stock compensation plan, a
deferred compensation plan for executives and a deferred compensation plan for directors. Details
regarding these plans can be found in Notes 1 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Number of
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities |
|
|
(b) Weighted |
|
|
Future Issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be Issued |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Under Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of |
|
|
of |
|
|
Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
(Excluding |
|
|
(d) Total of |
|
|
|
Options, |
|
|
Options, |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities in |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
Warrants and |
|
|
Reflected in |
|
|
Columns (a) |
|
Plan Category |
|
and Rights |
|
|
Rights |
|
|
Column (a)) |
|
|
and (c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by
shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation plan (1) |
|
|
2,662,425 |
|
|
$ |
28.68 |
|
|
|
3,788,923 |
|
|
|
6,451,348 |
|
Directors deferred compensation plan |
|
|
60,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,250 |
|
|
|
96,075 |
|
Executive deferred compensation plan |
|
|
31,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,094 |
|
|
|
248,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,755,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,041,267 |
|
|
|
6,796,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved
by shareholders: |
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
Employer match deferred compensation plan |
|
|
5,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The stock compensation plan also permits the grant of restricted stock and other forms of
equity, without limiting the number of shares which may be subject to any one kind of grant. The
Company has granted 473,728 restricted shares beginning in 2004, of which at December 31, 2008,
69,582 shares have vested, 73,200 have been forfeited, and 330,946 remain subject to forfeiture if
performance targets are not met. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis Long Term Incentives;
Options and Restricted Stock from the Companys definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120
days of December 31, 2008. |
34
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007(2) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Consolidated Statement of Income Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product charges |
|
$ |
127,199 |
|
|
$ |
114,529 |
|
|
$ |
105,033 |
|
|
$ |
96,258 |
|
|
$ |
89,925 |
|
Traditional life insurance premiums |
|
|
149,186 |
|
|
|
144,682 |
|
|
|
138,401 |
|
|
|
134,618 |
|
|
|
131,865 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
707,872 |
|
|
|
628,031 |
|
|
|
535,836 |
|
|
|
475,443 |
|
|
|
416,081 |
|
Derivative income (loss) |
|
|
(208,793 |
) |
|
|
(4,951 |
) |
|
|
70,340 |
|
|
|
(2,800 |
) |
|
|
15,607 |
|
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on
investments |
|
|
(156,309 |
) |
|
|
5,769 |
|
|
|
13,971 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
8,175 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
644,465 |
|
|
|
914,599 |
|
|
|
887,353 |
|
|
|
728,148 |
|
|
|
682,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(18,149 |
) |
|
|
86,339 |
|
|
|
90,129 |
|
|
|
72,842 |
|
|
|
66,076 |
|
Per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(0.61 |
) |
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
|
Earnings assuming dilution |
|
|
(0.61 |
) |
|
|
2.84 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
|
Cash dividends |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
29,893,909 |
|
|
|
30,321,617 |
|
|
|
29,904,624 |
|
|
|
29,414,988 |
|
|
|
29,140,890 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
10,854,059 |
|
|
$ |
11,067,070 |
|
|
$ |
9,782,626 |
|
|
$ |
8,299,208 |
|
|
$ |
7,501,680 |
|
Assets held in separate accounts |
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
862,738 |
|
|
|
764,377 |
|
|
|
639,895 |
|
|
|
552,029 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
14,060,814 |
|
|
|
13,927,859 |
|
|
|
12,154,012 |
|
|
|
10,153,933 |
|
|
|
9,100,736 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
371,005 |
|
|
|
316,930 |
|
|
|
218,399 |
|
|
|
218,446 |
|
|
|
217,183 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
13,802,353 |
|
|
|
13,024,877 |
|
|
|
11,273,154 |
|
|
|
9,309,538 |
|
|
|
8,267,934 |
|
Total stockholders equity (1) |
|
|
258,365 |
|
|
|
902,891 |
|
|
|
880,720 |
|
|
|
844,231 |
|
|
|
832,611 |
|
Book value per common share (1) |
|
|
8.46 |
|
|
|
29.98 |
|
|
|
29.59 |
|
|
|
28.88 |
|
|
|
28.87 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to Selected Consolidated Financial Data |
(1) |
|
Amounts are impacted by accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) totaling ($649.8)
million in 2008, ($36.3) million in 2007, $28.2 million in 2006, $82.3 million in 2005, and
$141.2 million in 2004. These amounts are net of deferred income taxes and other adjustments
for assumed changes in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred sales
inducements, unearned revenue reserve and value of insurance in force acquired. |
(2) |
|
Certain amounts in the 2007 consolidated balance sheet data have been reclassified to conform
to the 2008 financial statement presentation. |
35
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
When reading the following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations, please refer to our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in
Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this report. Unless noted otherwise, all
references to FBL Financial Group, Inc. (we or the Company) include all of its direct and indirect
subsidiaries, including its primary life insurance subsidiaries, Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
(Farm Bureau Life) and EquiTrust Life Insurance Company (EquiTrust Life) (collectively, the Life
Companies).
In this discussion and analysis, we explain our consolidated results of operations, financial
condition and where appropriate, factors that management believes may affect future performance,
including:
|
|
|
factors which affect our business, |
|
|
|
our revenues and expenses in the periods presented, |
|
|
|
changes in revenues and expenses between periods, |
|
|
|
sources of earnings and changes in shareholders equity, |
|
|
|
impact of these items on our overall financial condition and |
|
|
|
expected sources and uses of cash. |
We have organized our discussion and analysis as follows:
|
|
|
First, we discuss our business and drivers of profitability. |
|
|
|
We then describe the business environment in which we operate including factors that
affect operating results. |
|
|
|
We highlight significant events that are important to understanding our results of
operations and financial condition. |
|
|
|
We then review the results of operations beginning with an overview of the total company
results, followed by a more detailed review of those results by operating segment. |
|
|
|
We review our financial condition addressing investment portfolio, market risks, sources
and uses of cash, capital resources and requirements and commitments. |
|
|
|
Finally, we discuss critical accounting policies and recently issued accounting
standards. The critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the
portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require managements
most difficult or complex judgment. |
Overview and Profitability
We sell individual life insurance and annuity products through an exclusive distribution channel
and individual annuity products through independent agents and brokers. Our exclusive agency force
consists of 1,962 Farm Bureau agents and managers operating in the Midwestern and Western sections
of the United States. Our independent channel, which we began in 2003, consists of 19,098 agents
and brokers operating throughout the United States. In addition to writing direct insurance, we
assume business through various coinsurance agreements. Several subsidiaries support various
functional areas of the Life Companies and other affiliates, by providing investment advisory,
marketing and distribution, and leasing services. In addition, we manage two Farm Bureau
affiliated property-casualty companies.
Our profitability is primarily a factor of:
|
|
The volume of our life insurance and annuity business in force, which is driven by the
level of our sales and the persistency of the business written. |
|
|
The amount of spread (excess of net investment income earned over interest credited/option
costs) we earn on contract holders general account balances. |
|
|
The amount of fees we earn on contract holders separate account balances. |
|
|
Our ability to price our life insurance products to earn acceptable margins over the cost
of providing benefits and the expenses of acquiring and administering the products.
Competitive conditions, mortality experience, persistency, investment results and our ability
to maintain expenses in accordance with pricing assumptions |
36
|
|
drive our margins on the life products. On many products, we have the ability to mitigate
adverse experience through adjustments to credited interest rates, policyholder dividends or
cost of insurance charges. |
|
|
Our ability to manage our investment portfolio to maximize investment returns while
providing adequate liquidity for obligations to policyholders and minimizing the risk of
defaults or impairments of invested assets. |
|
|
Our ability to manage the level of our operating expenses. |
|
|
Actual experience and changes in assumptions for expected surrender and withdrawal rates,
mortality, and spreads used in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition expense and
deferred sales inducement amounts. |
|
|
Changes in fair values of derivatives and embedded derivatives relating to our index
annuity business. |
Impact of Recent Business Environment
The financial markets experienced stress during the second half of 2007, which continued and
significantly increased during 2008 and into 2009. The volatility and disruption in the financial
markets have reached unprecedented levels, causing the availability and cost of credit to be
materially affected. These factors, combined with volatile oil prices, depressed home prices and
increasing foreclosures, falling equity market values, declining business and consumer confidence
and the risks of increased inflation and unemployment, have precipitated a severe recession. These
economic conditions did not negatively impact our sales in 2008. However, an economic downturn
characterized by higher unemployment, lower family income, lower consumer spending, lower corporate
earnings and lower business investment may adversely impact the demand for our products in the
future. We also may experience a higher incidence of claims, lapses or surrenders of policies. We
cannot predict whether or when such actions may occur, or what impact, if any, such actions could
have on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
The fixed income markets are experiencing a period of extreme volatility and limited market
liquidity conditions, which has affected a broad range of asset classes and sectors. In addition,
there have been credit downgrade events and an increased probability of default for many fixed
income instruments. Equity markets have also been experiencing heightened volatility. These
events and the continuing market upheavals have had and may continue to have an adverse effect on
us. These volatile market conditions have also increased the difficulty of valuing certain
securities as trading is less frequent and/or market data is less observable. There were certain
securities that were in active markets with significant observable data that became illiquid due to
the current financial environment or market conditions. As a result, certain valuations require
greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods which are more complex. These values
may not ultimately be realizable in a market transaction, and such values may change very rapidly
as market conditions change and valuation assumptions are modified.
The volatile and illiquid market conditions increased levels of credit spreads (difference between
bond yields and risk-free interest rates) on fixed maturity securities during 2008. While the
increase in credit spreads generated a steeper yield curve making our annuity products more
attractive to investors, it also caused a significant reduction in the carrying value of our
investments, negatively impacting our financial condition and reported book value per share. These
conditions also caused us to hold a higher amount of cash and short-term investments in order to
maintain a more liquid position during uncertain times.
Our fixed annuity products contain features that allow contract holders to surrender a policy. To
encourage persistency, we impose a surrender charge against the account balance for early
termination of a contract within a specified period after its effective date. Most of the fixed
annuity products sold by the EquiTrust Life independent channel offer a market value adjustment
feature which is based on U.S. Treasury rates. This feature provides us interest rate protection
when U.S. Treasury interest rates are greater than the rates in effect when a contract is issued
and provides a benefit to contract holders when U.S. Treasury interest rates are less than the
rates in effect when a contract is issued. Late in 2008 and continuing into early 2009, market
conditions emerged with unprecedented low U.S. Treasury yields providing an environment where
contract holders were able to surrender with smaller net surrender charges, increasing the level of
surrender activity. The unanticipated increase in surrenders required us to update assumptions in
the models used to calculate amortization of deferred acquisition costs and deferred sales
inducements, which negatively impacted our results of operations in the fourth quarter of 2008.
We maintain certain capital levels in accordance with statutory and rating agency requirements.
Fixed annuity products generally place a strain on statutory capital when sold and add to capital
in subsequent years. As a result of the significant growth of the EquiTrust Life independent
distribution channel business, our need for capital has increased in recent years. In addition,
our capital levels were negatively impacted during 2008 as a result of realized
37
losses on our investments due to the downturn in economic activity, increased level of credit
spreads and limited liquidity conditions. In 2008, we incurred additional debt to assist with our
capital requirements and provide additional liquidity. During the last half of 2008, we also took
rate and other actions to reduce sales of new fixed rate annuity contracts at EquiTrust Life and
are evaluating the terms and conditions for future products to preserve our capital position. See
the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below for additional details regarding our capital
position.
Results of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
644,465 |
|
|
$ |
914,599 |
|
|
$ |
887,353 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
676,343 |
|
|
|
788,793 |
|
|
|
753,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,878 |
) |
|
|
125,806 |
|
|
|
133,488 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
13,662 |
|
|
|
(41,051 |
) |
|
|
(44,368 |
) |
Minority interest and equity income |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18,149 |
) |
|
$ |
86,339 |
|
|
$ |
90,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share assuming dilution |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
2.84 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct premiums collected, net of reinsurance ceded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
249,039 |
|
|
$ |
126,849 |
|
|
$ |
140,279 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
1,565,255 |
|
|
|
1,569,128 |
|
|
|
1,808,482 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
191,932 |
|
|
|
185,904 |
|
|
|
175,185 |
|
Variable Annuity and Variable Universal Life (1) |
|
|
136,971 |
|
|
|
181,309 |
|
|
|
154,651 |
|
Reinsurance assumed and other |
|
|
13,672 |
|
|
|
15,238 |
|
|
|
17,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,156,869 |
|
|
$ |
2,078,428 |
|
|
$ |
2,296,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct life insurance in force, end of year (in millions) |
|
$ |
43,513 |
|
|
$ |
41,092 |
|
|
$ |
38,372 |
|
Life insurance lapse rates |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
Withdrawal rates individual traditional annuity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive Distribution |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Independent Distribution |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are net of portion ceded to and include amounts assumed from alliance partners. |
Premiums collected is not a measure used in financial statements prepared according to U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). There is no comparable GAAP financial measure.
We use premiums collected to measure the productivity of our exclusive and independent agents.
Direct premiums collected in the Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution segment increased in
2008 primarily due to lower short-term market interest rates making certificates of deposits and
other short-term investments less attractive in relation to our traditional fixed annuity products.
Direct premiums collected in the Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution segment decreased
in 2008 as a result of rate and other actions taken to preserve capital in the second half of 2008,
partially offset by a more favorable market environment for traditional annuity products. Direct
premiums collected in the Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution segment decreased in
2007, primarily due to a more favorable market environment during 2006 for the sale of our
multi-year guaranteed annuity product combined with a competitive environment for index annuity
sales in 2007. We also took actions to further increase the profitability of our products in 2007.
Variable premiums collected tend to vary with volatility, performance of and confidence level in
the equity markets as well as crediting and interest rates on competing products, including fixed
rate annuities and bank-offered certificates of deposit.
The increase in the withdrawal rate for the Independent Distribution segment in 2008 is primarily
due to the impact of low U.S. Treasury yields on the market value adjustment feature for our direct
fixed annuity products, which
38
provided an environment where contract holders could surrender with smaller net surrender charges.
See additional details on this feature in the Market Risk of Financial Instruments section that
follows. We also believe aging of the business in force relating to the annuity business assumed
under coinsurance agreements and business written directly through the EquiTrust Life independent
agents is driving a portion of the increase in withdrawal rates as the surrender charge rate
decreases with the passage of time (at a rate generally equal to 1.0% per year). This makes a
surrender later in the contract period more economical for the contract holder, which results in
higher lapse rates as the business ages.
Net income (loss)
Net income (loss) decreased 121.0% in 2008 to ($18.1) million and decreased 4.2% in 2007 to $86.3
million. As discussed in detail below, net income (loss) decreased in 2008 primarily due to
realized losses on investments, the impact of changes in the assumptions used to amortize deferred
policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements and an increase in death benefits. Net
income decreased in 2007 due to the impact of changes in unrealized gains and losses on derivatives
and a decrease in realized gains on investments, partially offset by the impact of growth in the
volume of business in force and decrease in death benefits. The increase in volume of business in
force is quantified in the detailed discussion that follows by summarizing the face amount of
insurance in force for life products or account values of contracts in force for interest sensitive
products. The face amount of life insurance in force represents the gross death benefit payable to
policyholders and account value represents the value of the contract to the contract holder before
application of surrender charges or reduction for any policy loans outstanding. The following
discussion provides additional details on the items impacting net income (loss).
Spreads Earned on our Universal Life and Individual Traditional Annuity Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Weighted average yield on cash and invested assets |
|
|
6.18 |
% |
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
|
6.23 |
% |
Weighted average interest crediting rate/index cost |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average yield on cash and invested assets represents the yield on cash and investments
backing the universal life and traditional annuity products net of investment expenses. The yield
also includes gains or losses relating to our interest rate swap program for certain individual
traditional annuities. The impact of the swap program was previously reported in the weighted
average crediting rate/index costs and the 2007 and 2006 results above have been restated to
conform to the 2008 presentation. With respect to our index annuities, index costs represent the
expenses we incur to fund the annual index credits through the purchase of options and minimum
guaranteed interest credited on the index business. The weighted average crediting rate/index cost
and spread are computed excluding the impact of the amortization of deferred sales inducements.
The spread noted above decreased in 2008 and 2007 partially due a shift in the mix of direct
business to products with a lower spread target and a decrease in spread earned on assumed
business. In addition, in 2008 we had a decrease in prepayment fee income. We also retained a
higher amount of cash and short-term investments due to the volatile financial markets limiting the
availability of high quality fixed maturity securities and our desire to maintain a more liquid
position during uncertain economic times. See the Segment Information section that follows for
further discussion of our spreads.
Impact of Unlocking on Pre-tax Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share data) |
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
$ |
(14,957 |
) |
|
$ |
942 |
|
|
$ |
1,570 |
|
Amortization of deferred sales inducements |
|
|
(14,437 |
) |
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Amortization of value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
(1,276 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
Amortization of unearned revenues |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) to pre-tax income |
|
$ |
(29,343 |
) |
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
|
$ |
1,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact per common share (basic and diluted), net of tax |
|
$ |
(0.64 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
We periodically revise the key assumptions used in the calculation of the amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, value of insurance in force acquired and
unearned revenues for participating life insurance, variable and interest sensitive and index
products, as applicable, through an unlocking process. Revisions are made based on historical
results and our best estimate of future experience. The impact of unlocking is recorded in the
current period as an increase or decrease to amortization of the respective balances. While the
unlocking process can take place at any time, as needs dictate, the process typically takes place
annually with different blocks of business unlocked each quarter. The impact of unlocking in 2008
was primarily due to updating the amortization models for assumptions relating to the significant
increase to surrender and withdrawal rates late in 2008 and into 2009 on annuities sold through our
independent distribution channel, as discussed above in the Impact of Recent Business Environment
section. These assumption changes resulted in an unlocking adjustment which totaled $29.6 million
in the fourth quarter of 2008. See the Segment Information section that follows for additional
discussion of our unlocking adjustments.
Impact of Operating Adjustments on Net Income (Loss)
As noted in the Segment Information section that follows, we use both net income (loss) and
operating income to measure our operating results. Operating income for the years covered by this
report equals net income (loss), excluding the impact of: (1) realized gains and losses on
investments, (2) the change in net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives, (3) the cumulative
effect of change in accounting principles and (4) a lawsuit settlement. The rationale for
excluding these items from operating income is explained in the Segment Information section that
follows and Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
$ |
(156,309 |
) |
|
$ |
5,769 |
|
|
$ |
13,971 |
|
Change in net unrealized gains/losses on derivatives |
|
|
75,652 |
|
|
|
(49,361 |
) |
|
|
4,574 |
|
Change in amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(4,255 |
) |
|
|
16,856 |
|
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
Deferred sales inducements |
|
|
(19,966 |
) |
|
|
12,895 |
|
|
|
(1,409 |
) |
Value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Unearned revenue reserve |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Lawsuit settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,880 |
) |
Income tax offset |
|
|
36,475 |
|
|
|
4,846 |
|
|
|
(3,762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact of operating income adjustments |
|
$ |
(67,741 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,282 |
) |
|
$ |
6,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of adjustments noted above after offsets and
income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
$ |
(79,542 |
) |
|
$ |
4,501 |
|
|
$ |
9,222 |
|
Change in net unrealized gains/losses on derivatives |
|
|
11,801 |
|
|
|
(13,500 |
) |
|
|
936 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Lawsuit settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact of operating income adjustments |
|
$ |
(67,741 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,282 |
) |
|
$ |
6,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact per common share basic |
|
$ |
(2.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact per common share assuming dilution |
|
$ |
(2.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Changes in Net Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) totaled ($18.1) million in 2008, $86.3 million in 2007 and $90.1 million in 2006.
A detailed discussion of changes in net income (loss) is included below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 |
|
|
2007 vs. 2006 |
|
Premiums and product charges |
|
$ |
17,174 |
|
|
$ |
15,777 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
79,841 |
|
|
|
92,195 |
|
Derivative income (loss) |
|
|
(203,842 |
) |
|
|
(75,291 |
) |
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
(162,078 |
) |
|
|
(8,202 |
) |
Other income and other expenses |
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
|
|
642 |
|
Interest sensitive and index products benefits and change in value
of index product embedded derivative |
|
|
185,561 |
|
|
|
(27,510 |
) |
Traditional life insurance policy benefits |
|
|
(10,293 |
) |
|
|
(3,069 |
) |
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses |
|
|
(59,573 |
) |
|
|
2,698 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,901 |
) |
|
|
(4,922 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
54,713 |
|
|
|
3,317 |
|
Minority interest and equity income |
|
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
Total change in net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(104,488 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,790 |
) |
|
|
|
Premiums and Product Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Premiums and product charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product charges |
|
$ |
127,199 |
|
|
$ |
114,529 |
|
|
$ |
105,033 |
|
Traditional life insurance premiums |
|
|
149,186 |
|
|
|
144,682 |
|
|
|
138,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
276,385 |
|
|
$ |
259,211 |
|
|
$ |
243,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and product charges increased 6.6% in 2008 to $276.4 million and 6.5% in 2007 to $259.2
million. The increases in interest sensitive and index product charges in 2008 and 2007 are
principally driven by surrender charges on annuity and universal life products and cost of
insurance charges on variable universal life and universal life products.
Surrender charges totaled $33.6 million in 2008, $23.4 million in 2007 and $18.3 million in 2006.
Surrender charges increased primarily due to an increase in surrenders relating to the impact of
market value adjustments on certain products sold by our EquiTrust Life independent distribution,
as discussed in the Impact of Recent Business Environment section above, and also due to growth
in the volume and aging of business in force.
Surrender Charges on EquiTrust Life Direct Fixed Annuity Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Surrender charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross surrender charges |
|
$ |
37,519 |
|
|
$ |
8,792 |
|
|
$ |
3,538 |
|
Market value adjustments |
|
|
(15,537 |
) |
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net surrender charges |
|
$ |
21,982 |
|
|
$ |
9,937 |
|
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average aggregate account value for annuity and universal life insurance in force, which
increased due to increases in premiums collected as summarized in the Other data table above,
totaled $9,715.4 million for 2008, $8,428.8 million for 2007 and $6,861.7 million for 2006. We
believe aging of the business in force is also driving a portion of the increase in surrender
charges relating to the annuity business assumed under coinsurance agreements and business written
directly through the EquiTrust Life independent agents as the surrender charge rate decreases with
the passage of time (at a rate generally equal to 1.0% per year). This makes a surrender later in
the contract period more economical for the contract holder, which results in higher lapse rates as
the business ages. We started
41
assuming business under coinsurance agreements in 2001 and started selling annuities directly
through EquiTrust Life independent agents in the fourth quarter of 2003. Net surrender charges on
this coinsurance and direct business totaled $30.5 million for 2008, $20.5 million for 2007 and
$15.6 million for 2006.
Cost of insurance charges totaled $68.0 million in 2008, $65.3 million in 2007 and $63.8 million in
2006. Cost of insurance charges increased primarily due to aging of the business in force as the
cost of insurance charge rate per each $1,000 in force increases with the age of the insured, and
sales of our new universal life secondary guarantee product introduced in 2008. The average age of
our universal life and variable universal life policyholders was 46.0 years in 2008, 45.4 years in
2007 and 45.0 years in 2006.
Traditional premiums increased in 2008 and 2007 due to an increase in the volume of business in
force. The increase in the business in force is primarily attributable to sales of traditional
life products by our Farm Bureau Life agency force exceeding the loss of in force amounts through
deaths, lapses and surrenders. Our average aggregate traditional life insurance in force, net of
reinsurance ceded, totaled $22,060.9 million for 2008, $20,089.8 million for 2007 and $18,294.4
million for 2006. The change in life insurance in force is not proportional to the change in
premium income due to a shift in the composition of our traditional life block of business from
whole life policies to term policies. The premium for a term policy per $1,000 face amount is less
than that for a whole life policy.
Net Investment Income
Net investment income, which excludes investment income on separate account assets relating to
variable products, increased 12.7% in 2008 to $707.9 million and increased 17.2% in 2007 to $628.0
million. These increases are primarily due to increases in average invested assets. Average
invested assets increased 13.5% to $11,835.2 million (based on securities at amortized cost) in
2008 and 18.2% to $10,430.4 million in 2007. Average invested assets totaled $8,822.7 million in
2006. The increase in average invested assets in 2008 and 2007 is principally due to net premium
inflows from the Life Companies and proceeds from borrowings in March 2007 and the last half of
2008.
Net investment income was impacted by fee income from bond calls, tender offers and mortgage loan
prepayments, which totaled $2.8 million in 2008, $10.1 million in 2007 and $8.9 million in 2006.
Net investment income also includes less than $0.1 million in 2008, ($1.3) million in 2007 and $0.1
million in 2006 representing the acceleration (reversal) of net discount accretion on mortgage and
asset-backed securities resulting from changing prepayment speed assumptions at the end of each
respective period. See the Financial Condition Investments section that follows for a
description of how changes in prepayment speeds impact net investment income.
The annualized yield earned on average invested assets decreased to 6.17% in 2008 from 6.19% in
2007 and 6.25% in 2006. The decrease in yield earned in 2008 is primarily due to the reduction in
fee income described above and an increase in the level of cash and short-term investments we
retained due to the volatile financial markets limiting the availability of high quality fixed
maturity securities and our desire to maintain a more liquid position during uncertain economic
times. Market conditions also impacted the investment portfolio yields based on the level of
market investment rates for new acquisitions compared to our average portfolio yield or the yield
on investments maturing or being paid down. The average yields on fixed maturity securities
purchased were 6.32% for 2008, 6.11% for 2007 and 6.04% for 2006. The average yields on fixed
maturity securities maturing or being paid down were 6.13% for 2008, 6.59% for 2007 and 6.62% for
2006.
Derivative Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Derivative income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of derivative income (loss) from call options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains received at expiration |
|
$ |
36,280 |
|
|
$ |
156,378 |
|
|
$ |
67,919 |
|
Change in the difference between fair value and
remaining option cost at beginning and end of year |
|
|
(109,727 |
) |
|
|
(51,087 |
) |
|
|
75,655 |
|
Cost of money for call options |
|
|
(128,514 |
) |
|
|
(108,379 |
) |
|
|
(73,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201,961 |
) |
|
|
(3,088 |
) |
|
|
70,504 |
|
Other |
|
|
(6,832 |
) |
|
|
(1,863 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(208,793 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,951 |
) |
|
$ |
70,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
Gains received at expiration decreased in 2008 as a result of declines in the S&P 500 Index® (upon
which the majority of our options are based). Gains received at expiration increased in 2007 due
to growth in the volume of index annuities in force and appreciation in the market indices on which
our options are based. These gains are used to fund index credits on index annuities, which also
decreased in 2008 and increased in 2007, as discussed below under Interest Sensitive and Index
Product Benefits. The average aggregate account value of index annuities in force, which has
increased due to new sales, totaled $4,709.6 million for 2008, $4,106.8 million for 2007 and
$3,200.1 million for 2006. The changes in the difference between the fair value of the call
options and the remaining option costs are caused primarily by the timing of index settlements and
the change in the S&P 500 Index.
Range of Index Appreciation for S&P 500 Index Options Expiring During the Periods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Annual point-to-point strategy |
|
|
0.0%-2.6 |
% |
|
|
1.9%-24.4 |
% |
|
|
1.1%-16.0 |
% |
Monthly sum cap strategy |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Monthly point-to-point strategy |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0%-16.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0%-12.7 |
% |
Monthly average strategy one-year options |
|
|
0.0%-6.3 |
% |
|
|
1.2%-14.1 |
% |
|
|
0.9%-9.1 |
% |
Monthly average strategy two-year options |
|
|
0.0%-14.1 |
% |
|
|
8.1%-16.4 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
Daily average strategy |
|
|
0.0%-5.2 |
% |
|
|
2.1%-11.1 |
% |
|
|
0.7%-8.7 |
% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
not applicable as option strategy was not offered during the prior period. |
The change in fair value is also reduced by participation rates and caps, as applicable, on the
underlying options. Furthermore, the change in fair value is impacted by options based on other
underlying indices. The cost of money for call options increased due to the impact of growth in
the volume of index annuities in force. In addition, the price of call options increased due to an
increase in the volatility of the equity markets during 2008 and 2007. Other derivative loss is
comprised of changes in the value of the conversion feature embedded in convertible fixed maturity
securities and the embedded derivative included in our modified coinsurance contracts. In
addition, beginning in the second quarter of 2007, other derivative loss includes cash flows and
the change in fair value of the interest rate swaps relating to our flexible premium deferred
annuity contracts due to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement)
133 Implementation Issue No. G26, Cash Flow Hedges: Hedging Interest Cash Flows on Variable Rate
Assets and Liabilities That Are Not Based on a Benchmark Interest Rate. See Note 3 to our
consolidated financial statements for additional details on this change in accounting. Derivative
income (loss) will fluctuate based on market conditions.
Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains on sales |
|
$ |
7,387 |
|
|
$ |
10,398 |
|
|
$ |
16,861 |
|
Realized losses on sales |
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
Realized losses due to impairments |
|
|
(158,219 |
) |
|
|
(4,502 |
) |
|
|
(2,340 |
) |
Unrealized gains on trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(156,309 |
) |
|
$ |
5,769 |
|
|
$ |
13,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The level of realized/unrealized gains (losses) is subject to fluctuation from period to period
depending on the prevailing interest rate and economic environment and the timing of the sale of
investments. Gains on sales include $4.1 million in 2008, $6.1 million in 2007 and $13.5 million
in 2006 related to sales of a portion of our investment in American Equity Investment Life Holding
Company (AEL) common stock. Gains on sales in 2006 also included a $1.9 million gain related to
the sale of our equity investment in an affiliate, Western Agricultural Insurance Company, to
another affiliate, Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau Mutual). Realized losses on
sales in 2008 include a $2.3 million loss on a bank and a $2.1 million loss on a printing and
publishing company. Both of these companies experienced a significant deterioration of financial
results during 2008 and filed for
43
bankruptcy. See Financial Condition Investments and Note 2 for details regarding our
unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
We monitor the financial condition and operations of the issuers of securities rated below
investment grade and of the issuers of certain investment grade securities on which we have
concerns regarding credit quality. In determining whether or not an unrealized loss is other than
temporary, we review factors such as:
|
|
|
historical operating trends; |
|
|
|
business prospects; |
|
|
|
status of the industry in which the company operates; |
|
|
|
analyst ratings on the issuer and sector; |
|
|
|
quality of management; |
|
|
|
size of the unrealized loss; |
|
|
|
level of current market interest rates compared to market interest rates when the
security was purchased; |
|
|
|
length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position; and |
|
|
|
our intent and ability to hold the security. |
If we determine that an unrealized loss is other than temporary, the security is written down to
its fair value with the difference between amortized cost and fair value recognized as a realized
loss.
Investment Impairments Individually Exceeding $0.5 Million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
General Description |
|
Loss |
|
Circumstances |
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
$ |
68,487 |
|
|
Losses on 13 securities increased due to increasing delinquencies by homeowners. Collateral is second lien home equity loans with minimal recoveries expected. In addition, underlying insurance that was expected to absorb losses was deemed to be less valuable due to the monoline insurer being downgraded. One issuer also filed for bankruptcy. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depository Institution |
|
$ |
10,969 |
|
|
Issuer filed for bankruptcy after unsuccessful attempts to obtain financial assistance. This reduced estimates on potential recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed security |
|
$ |
10,959 |
|
|
Ratings declined and the probability of future losses increased due to declining economic conditions and a reduction in the debt available to absorb losses prior to our ownership class. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign depository institution |
|
$ |
9,900 |
|
|
The probability of future losses increased due to declining economic conditions. In addition, the board of directors resigned and a foreign government seized control of the entire banking system due to financial turmoil. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligation |
|
$ |
9,800 |
|
|
The value of collateral supporting this issue declined, which triggered an event whereby we did not receive interest on our investment. Rating declines on the security also occurred during 2008. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other asset-backed security |
|
$ |
9,114 |
|
|
Ratings declined and losses from the underlying home equity loans to Alt-A borrowers increased. (A) |
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
General Description |
|
Loss |
|
Circumstances |
Reinsurance carrier |
|
$ |
7,299 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred and the fair value decreased significantly due to subprime and Alt-A exposure and the parent's potential reorganization, which reduced estimates on potential recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major printing & publishing company |
|
$ |
6,868 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred and concerns regarding short-term liquidity in the current economic environment reduced estimates on potential recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities & commodities broker |
|
$ |
5,980 |
|
|
Issuer filed for bankruptcy after unsuccessful attempts to obtain financial assistance. This reduced estimates on potential recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major printing & publishing company |
|
$ |
3,871 |
|
|
Issuer filed for bankruptcy after unsuccessful attempts to obtain financial assistance. This reduced estimates on potential recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major United States automaker |
|
$ |
3,570 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred due to deteriorating economic conditions and increased concerns about the company's ability to sustain as a going concern. This reduced estimates on potential recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities & commodities broker |
|
$ |
2,893 |
|
|
Bankruptcy filings by a counterparty reduced estimates on the potential recovery of derivative instruments assumed through a coinsurance agreement. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major United States automaker |
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred due to deteriorating economic conditions and liquidity concerns. This reduced estimates on potential recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major printing & publishing company |
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
Rating declines and other adverse details regarding the financial status of the company became available. The company also filed for bankruptcy protection. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major retail company |
|
$ |
2,219 |
|
|
The company reported negative earnings results and the probability of future losses increased due to declining economic conditions. The company also filed for bankruptcy protection, further reducing estimates on potential recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured investment vehicle |
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred and the issuer was served a notice of default, which reduced estimates on potential recovery. The company also filed for bankruptcy protection. This issue is held as collateral for securities lending. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major printing and publishing company |
|
$ |
3,285 |
|
|
The company announced that it would take the company private in a series of transactions tendering outstanding shares. In addition, rating declines and other adverse details regarding the financial status of the company became available. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States military base
housing revenue bond |
|
$ |
812 |
|
|
The United States closed one military base leading to a restructuring and tender offer for the bonds. (A) |
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
General Description |
|
Loss |
|
Circumstances |
Year ended December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major United States credit company |
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
Valuation of this security is tied to the strength of its parent. Continued rating declines and other adverse details regarding the financial status of the parent company became available. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major United States automaker |
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
Continued rating declines and other adverse details regarding the financial status of the company became available. In addition, the company faced labor strikes and restated its financial statements. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major United States automaker |
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
Continued rating declines and other adverse details regarding the financial status of the company became available. (A) |
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Negative trends in this segment of the industry were considered in our analysis, which is
done on an issue-by-issue basis. We concluded that there is no impact on other material
investments in addition to amounts already written down. |
Other Income and Other Expenses
Other income and other expenses include revenues and expenses, respectively, relating primarily to
our non-insurance operations. Our non-insurance operations include management, advisory, marketing
and distribution services and leasing activities. Fluctuations in these financial statement line
items are generally attributable to fluctuations in the level of these services provided during the
years.
Interest Sensitive and Index Product Benefits and Change in Value of Index Product Embedded
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest sensitive and index product benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest credited |
|
$ |
289,761 |
|
|
$ |
240,943 |
|
|
$ |
204,693 |
|
Index credits |
|
|
35,552 |
|
|
|
154,449 |
|
|
|
71,299 |
|
Amortization of deferred sales inducements |
|
|
67,729 |
|
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
|
18,680 |
|
Interest sensitive death benefits |
|
|
47,388 |
|
|
|
37,800 |
|
|
|
44,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,430 |
|
|
|
442,544 |
|
|
|
338,832 |
|
Change in value of index product embedded derivative |
|
|
(189,354 |
) |
|
|
(5,907 |
) |
|
|
70,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
251,076 |
|
|
$ |
436,637 |
|
|
$ |
409,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product benefits and change in value of index product embedded
derivatives decreased 42.5% in 2008 to $251.1 million and increased 6.7% in 2007 to $436.6 million.
The decrease in 2008 is primarily due to market depreciation on the indices backing the index
annuities, partially offset by the impact of unlocking of amortization of deferred sales
inducements associated with increased surrenders and withdrawals. In addition, interest credited
increased due to an increase in the volume of annuity business in force and there was an increase
in interest sensitive death benefits. In 2007, the increase was primarily due to an increase in
volume of annuity business in force, partially offset by market depreciation and a decrease in
interest sensitive death benefits. Interest sensitive and index product benefits tend to fluctuate
from period to period primarily as a result of changes in mortality experience and the impact of
changes in the equity markets on index credits, amortization of deferred sales inducements and the
value of the embedded derivatives in our index annuities.
The average aggregate account value of annuity contracts in force, which increased due to
additional premiums collected as summarized in the Other data table above, totaled $8,821.1
million for 2008, $7,536.9 million for
46
2007 and $5,970.0 million for 2006. These account values include values relating to index
contracts totaling $4,709.6 million for 2008, $4,106.8 million for 2007 and $3,200.1 million for
2006.
The weighted average interest crediting rate/index cost for universal life and individual
traditional annuity products, excluding the impact of the amortization of deferred sales
inducements, was 3.94% for 2008, 3.72% for 2007 and 3.63% for 2006. See the Segment Information
section that follows for additional details on our spreads.
As discussed above under Derivative Income (Loss), the change in the amount of index credits is
impacted by growth in the volume of index annuities in force and the amount of
appreciation/depreciation in the underlying market indices on which our options are based. The
change in the value of the embedded derivative is impacted by the change in expected index credits
on the next policy anniversary dates, which is related to the change in the fair value of the
options acquired to fund these index credits. The value of the embedded derivative is also
impacted by the timing of the posting of index credits and changes in reserve discount rates and
assumptions used in estimating future call option costs. In addition, during 2006, we reduced our
reserves for the embedded derivative in our coinsured index annuities $7.1 million. This
adjustment, which is the correction of an overstatement that started in 2001, increased net income
(loss) $2.6 million ($0.09 per basic and diluted common share) after offsets for taxes and the
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. This adjustment
does not impact our segment results as the segment results are based on operating income which, as
explained in the Segment Information section, excludes the impact of changes in the valuation of
derivatives.
The changes in amortization of deferred sales inducements are primarily due to the impact of
changes in unrealized gains and losses on derivatives and unlocking assumptions used in the
amortization calculation. In addition, the impact of new sales increased amortization in 2008 and
2007. Deferred sales inducements on interest sensitive and index products totaled $417.1 million
at December 31, 2008, $319.2 million at December 31, 2007 and $225.1 million at December 31, 2006.
The impact of unlocking and the change in unrealized gains/losses on derivatives is detailed in the
sections above.
Traditional Life Insurance Policy Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Traditional life insurance policy benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional life insurance benefits |
|
$ |
96,884 |
|
|
$ |
90,808 |
|
|
$ |
90,837 |
|
Increase in traditional life future policy benefits |
|
|
43,255 |
|
|
|
37,682 |
|
|
|
33,500 |
|
Distributions to participating policyholders |
|
|
20,064 |
|
|
|
21,420 |
|
|
|
22,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
160,203 |
|
|
$ |
149,910 |
|
|
$ |
146,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional life insurance policy benefits increased 6.9% in 2008 to $160.2 million and 2.1% in
2007 to $149.9 million. Traditional life insurance death benefits increased 18.6% to $60.6 million
in 2008 and decreased 5.0% to $51.1 million in 2007. Surrender benefits decreased 7.8% to $32.6
million in 2008 and increased 7.5% to $35.4 million in 2007. The change in traditional life and
future policy benefits may not be proportional to the change in traditional premiums and benefits
as reserves on term policies are generally less than reserves on whole life policies.
Distributions to participating policyholders decreased in 2008 and 2007 due to reductions in our
dividend crediting rates in response to the impact of declining market interest rates on our
investment portfolio yield as discussed in the Net Investment Income section above. Traditional
life insurance benefits can fluctuate from period to period primarily as a result of changes in
mortality experience.
47
Underwriting, Acquisition and Insurance Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission expense, net of deferrals |
|
$ |
13,613 |
|
|
$ |
13,906 |
|
|
$ |
13,497 |
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
128,114 |
|
|
|
68,394 |
|
|
|
68,541 |
|
Amortization of value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
5,069 |
|
|
|
3,458 |
|
Other underwriting, acquisition and insurance
expenses, net of deferrals |
|
|
76,961 |
|
|
|
74,451 |
|
|
|
79,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
221,393 |
|
|
$ |
161,820 |
|
|
$ |
164,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses increased 36.8% in 2008 to $221.4 million and
decreased 1.7% in 2007 to $161.8 million. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
increased in 2008 primarily due to the impact of unlocking assumptions used in the amortization
calculation. See sections above and the Market Risks of Financial Instruments Interest Rate
Risk section that follows for additional information on the impact of increased surrender activity
on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs. In addition, amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs increased due to the impact of unrealized gains/losses on derivatives and
an increase in the volume of business in force resulting primarily from direct sales from our
EquiTrust Life distribution channel, partially offset by the impact of realized/unrealized gains
and losses on investments. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs on our direct
EquiTrust Life business, excluding the impact of unlocking, changes in unrealized gains/losses on
investments and derivatives, totaled $42.5 million in 2008, $24.6 million in 2007 and $15.1 million
in 2006. The impact of realized/unrealized gains and losses on investments and the change in
unrealized gains/losses on derivatives is detailed in the sections above. Amortization of value of
insurance in force acquired decreased in 2008 and increased in 2007 primarily due to the impact of
unlocking in 2007 and realized losses on investments in 2008.
The increase in other underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses in 2008 is primarily due to
a $1.0 million increase in software amortization and a $0.5 million increase in salaries and
benefits. The decrease in other underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses in 2007 is
primarily due to a $4.9 million lawsuit settlement in 2006 ($0.11 per basic and diluted common
share, after taxes). See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for further details
regarding the lawsuit settlement and a related unrecorded gain contingency.
During the first quarter of 2009, we announced certain cost-saving measures that we anticipate will
reduce expenses by approximately $7.0 million, partially offset by approximately $1.2 million in
one-time charges associated with implementing these cost-saving measures. In addition, we
anticipate our pension expense will increase approximately $3.1 million in 2009, primarily due to
losses on plan assets during 2008. The majority of the net decrease will be reflected in other
underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses, while the remainder will decrease other expenses.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased 17.4% to $19.6 million in 2008 and 41.9% to $16.7 million in 2007
primarily due to an increase in our debt. Our average debt outstanding was $336.7 million in 2008
compared to $296.6 million in 2007 and $218.4 million in 2006. As discussed in the Liquidity and
Capital Resources section that follows, our average debt outstanding increased due to issuance of
the 2017 Senior Notes in March 2007 and the 2011 Senior Notes in November 2008 and an increase in
the borrowing on our line of credit agreement in September 2008.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) totaled ($13.7) million in 2008, $41.1 million in 2007 and $44.4
million in 2006. The effective tax rate was 42.9% for 2008, 32.6% for 2007 and 33.2% for 2006.
The effective tax rates differ from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the impact
of tax-exempt interest and tax-exempt dividend income. The permanent differences between book and
tax income increase the effective rate when there is a net loss and decrease the effective rate
when there is a net gain. Permanent differences have a greater impact on the effective rates in
2008 due to the size of the pre-tax loss for the year relative to the size of the permanent
differences. The
48
decrease in the 2007 effective rate is primarily attributable to higher tax-exempt interest and
dividend income and lower state income taxes.
In its Revenue Ruling 2007-61, issued on September 25, 2007, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
announced its intention to issue regulations which would limit our ability to receive a
dividends-received deduction (DRD) on separate account assets held in connection with variable
annuity and variable universal life insurance contracts. Revenue Ruling 2007-61 suspended Revenue
Ruling 2007-54 issued in August 2007 that purported to change accepted industry and IRS
interpretations of the statutes governing these computation questions. No regulations were issued
during 2008. Any regulations that the IRS ultimately proposes for issuance in this area will be
subject to public notice and comment, at which time insurance companies and other members of the
public will have the opportunity to raise legal and practical questions about the content, scope
and application of such regulations. As a result, the ultimate timing, substance, and effective
date of any such regulations are unknown, but they could result in the elimination of some or all
of the separate account DRD tax benefit we receive. We recorded separate account DRD tax benefits
totaling $1.7 million in 2008, $2.4 million in 2007 and $1.6 million in 2006.
Equity Income (Loss), Net of Related Income Taxes
Equity income (loss), net of related income taxes, totaled less than ($0.1) million in 2008, $1.5
million in 2007 and $1.1 million in 2006. Equity income includes our proportionate share of gains
and losses attributable to our ownership interest in partnerships, joint ventures and certain
companies where we exhibit some control but have a minority ownership interest. Given the timing
of availability of financial information from our equity investees, we will consistently use
information that is as much as three months in arrears for certain of these entities. Several of
these entities are investment companies whose operating results are derived primarily from
unrealized and realized gains and losses generated by their investment portfolios. As is normal
with these types of entities, the level of these gains and losses is subject to fluctuation from
period to period depending on the prevailing economic environment, changes in prices of equity
securities held by the investment partnerships, timing and success of initial public offerings and
other exit strategies, and the timing of the sale of investments held by the partnerships and joint
ventures.
Segment Information
We analyze operations by reviewing financial information regarding products that are aggregated
into four product segments. The product segments are: (1) Traditional Annuity Exclusive
Distribution (Exclusive Annuity), (2) Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution
(Independent Annuity), (3) Traditional and Universal Life Insurance and (4) Variable. We also
have various support operations and corporate capital that are aggregated into a Corporate and
Other segment.
We analyze our segment results based on pre-tax operating income (loss). Accordingly, income taxes
are not allocated to the segments. In addition, operating results are generally reported net of
any transactions between the segments. Operating income for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 represents net income (loss) excluding, as applicable, the after tax impact of:
|
|
|
realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments; |
|
|
|
|
changes in net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives; |
|
|
|
|
the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles; and |
|
|
|
|
a nonrecurring lawsuit settlement. |
The impact of realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments and unrealized gains and
losses on derivatives also includes adjustments for that portion of amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, unearned revenue reserve and value of insurance in
force acquired attributable to such gains or losses. Our rationale for using operating income, in
addition to net income (loss) to measure our performance is summarized in Note 14, Segment
Information, to our consolidated financial statements.
49
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Pre-tax Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18,149 |
) |
|
$ |
86,339 |
|
|
$ |
90,129 |
|
Net impact of operating income adjustments (1) |
|
|
67,741 |
|
|
|
9,282 |
|
|
|
(6,986 |
) |
Income taxes on operating income |
|
|
22,812 |
|
|
|
46,444 |
|
|
|
41,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
$ |
72,404 |
|
|
$ |
142,065 |
|
|
$ |
124,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income (loss) by segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
27,946 |
|
|
$ |
33,011 |
|
|
$ |
35,555 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
5,360 |
|
|
|
39,875 |
|
|
|
30,439 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
53,059 |
|
|
|
58,685 |
|
|
|
58,706 |
|
Variable |
|
|
(1,584 |
) |
|
|
12,514 |
|
|
|
3,596 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(12,377 |
) |
|
|
(2,020 |
) |
|
|
(3,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,404 |
|
|
$ |
142,065 |
|
|
$ |
124,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) See Impact of Operating Adjustments on Net Income (Loss) above for additional details on
operating income adjustments. |
A discussion of our operating results, by segment, follows:
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product charges and
other income |
|
$ |
1,261 |
|
|
$ |
1,111 |
|
|
$ |
1,091 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
145,309 |
|
|
|
146,267 |
|
|
|
146,433 |
|
Derivative income (loss) |
|
|
(2,859 |
) |
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,711 |
|
|
|
150,403 |
|
|
|
147,365 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
115,765 |
|
|
|
117,392 |
|
|
|
111,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
$ |
27,946 |
|
|
$ |
33,011 |
|
|
$ |
35,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity premiums collected, direct |
|
$ |
249,039 |
|
|
$ |
126,849 |
|
|
$ |
140,279 |
|
Policy liabilities and accruals, end of year |
|
|
2,353,056 |
|
|
|
2,217,651 |
|
|
|
2,229,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual deferred annuity spread: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on cash and invested assets |
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
|
6.67 |
% |
|
|
6.74 |
% |
Weighted average interest crediting rate/index cost |
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
4.36 |
% |
|
|
4.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread |
|
|
2.10 |
% |
|
|
2.31 |
% |
|
|
2.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual traditional annuity withdrawal rate |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Pre-tax operating income for the Exclusive Annuity segment decreased 15.3% in 2008 to $27.9 million
and 7.2% in 2007 to $33.0 million. The decrease in 2008 is primarily due to losses on our interest
rate swaps and a reduction in investment prepayment fee income, partially offset by reducing
crediting rates during 2008 and 2007 and growth of the volume of business in force. The decrease
in 2007 was primarily due to the impact of unlocking on deferred policy acquisition costs as
discussed under Net Income (Loss).
Net investment income includes $1.5 million in 2008, $4.6 million in 2007 and $3.5 million in 2006
in fee income from bond calls, tender offers and mortgage loan prepayments and the change in net
discount accretion on mortgage and asset-backed securities as noted in the Net Investment Income
section above. The weighted average yield on
50
cash and invested assets was negatively impacted in 2008 and 2007 by reinvestment rates being lower
than the yield on investments maturing or being paid down. The weighted average yield also includes
the impact of our interest rate swap program. Income from these swaps was netted against interest
credited through March 31, 2007, but included in derivative income (loss) starting in the second
quarter of 2007. Operating income (loss) from these swaps totaled ($2.5) million in 2008, $3.9
million in 2007 and $3.7 million in 2006. See Market Risks of Financial Instruments following
and Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding these
hedges and the accounting change in 2007.
Benefits and expenses decreased in 2008 primarily due to a decrease in interest credited and index
credits on contract holders account balances. Effective March 1, 2008, we decreased the interest
crediting rate on a significant portion of our annuity portfolio 30 basis points in response to the
decline in portfolio yield. The increase in benefits and expenses in 2007 was primarily due to the
impact of unlocking, which increased amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs $0.6 million
in 2008 and $1.2 million in 2007 and decreased amortization $1.7 million in 2006.
The decrease in spreads is primarily due to the items impacting net investment income. While we
have decreased interest crediting rates for many contracts, certain other products have reached the
minimum guarantee crediting rates, which contributes to the decrease in spreads. Also contributing
to the decrease in spreads is a shift of business to a new money product that has a short
guaranteed interest period and lower spread target.
Premiums collected increased 96.3% to $249.0 million in 2008 and decreased 9.6% to $126.8 million
in 2007. The amount of traditional annuity premiums collected is highly dependent upon the
relationship between the current crediting rates on our products and the crediting rates available
on competing products, including bank-offered certificates of deposit. We believe the increase in
annuity premiums in 2008 is due to lower short-term market interest rates making certificates of
deposit and other short-term investments less attractive in relation to these traditional
annuities. We believe the decrease in annuity premiums in 2007 was due to a rise in short-term
market interest rates. We also believe this environment resulted in fewer surrenders in 2008 and
increased surrenders in 2007 and 2006, which impacted the withdrawal rates. For the company in
total, the changes in annuity premiums were partially offset by changes in variable annuity
premiums as discussed in the Variable Segment section that follows.
The average aggregate account value for annuity contracts in force in the Exclusive Annuity segment
totaled $1,564.1 million for 2008, $1,488.9 million for 2007 and $1,479.5 million for 2006.
51
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product charges |
|
$ |
30,467 |
|
|
$ |
20,466 |
|
|
$ |
15,612 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
395,127 |
|
|
|
309,131 |
|
|
|
225,206 |
|
Derivative income (loss) |
|
|
(92,233 |
) |
|
|
47,290 |
|
|
|
(4,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,361 |
|
|
|
376,887 |
|
|
|
236,447 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
328,001 |
|
|
|
337,012 |
|
|
|
206,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
$ |
5,360 |
|
|
$ |
39,875 |
|
|
$ |
30,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity premiums collected, independent channel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate annuities |
|
$ |
915,843 |
|
|
$ |
690,646 |
|
|
$ |
807,103 |
|
Index annuities |
|
|
649,412 |
|
|
|
878,482 |
|
|
|
1,001,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total annuity premiums collected, independent channel |
|
|
1,565,255 |
|
|
|
1,569,128 |
|
|
|
1,808,482 |
|
Annuity premiums collected, assumed |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
3,187 |
|
|
|
4,725 |
|
Policy liabilities and accruals, end of year |
|
|
7,708,423 |
|
|
|
6,825,713 |
|
|
|
5,367,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual deferred annuity spread: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on cash and invested assets |
|
|
6.12 |
% |
|
|
5.84 |
% |
|
|
5.86 |
% |
Weighted average interest crediting rate/index cost |
|
|
3.86 |
% |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
3.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread |
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual traditional annuity withdrawal rate |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Pre-tax operating income for the Independent Annuity segment decreased 86.6% in 2008 to $5.4
million and increased 31.0% in 2007 to $39.9 million. The decrease in 2008 is primarily
attributable to the impact of unlocking on our direct business and a reduction in spreads on
assumed business, partially offset by increased volume of business in force. The increase in 2007
is principally due to growth in the volume of business in force, partially offset by a decrease in
spreads. The volume of business in force increased due to the growth of our EquiTrust Life
distribution channel and lower short-term market interest rates making certificates of deposits and
other short-term investments less attractive in relation to our traditional annuity products. The
average aggregate account value for annuity contracts in force in the Independent Annuity segment
totaled $7,169.2 million for 2008, $5,966.7 million for 2007 and $4,401.2 million for 2006.
The increases in interest sensitive and index product charges are due to an increase in surrender
charges. Surrender charges increased due to an increase in surrenders and withdrawals relating to
the impact of market value adjustments on our direct fixed annuity products and growth in the
volume and aging of business in force. In 2008, gross surrender charges were partially offset by
the impact of the market value adjustment feature. This activity also caused increased withdrawal
rates. See additional details on the impact of the market value adjustment under Premiums and
Product Charges above and the Market Risks of Financial Instruments section that follows. The
increases in net investment income are primarily attributable to growth in invested assets
principally due to net premium inflows, and in 2008, an increase in the weighted average yield
earned.
The changes in derivative income (loss) are primarily due to changes in proceeds from call option
settlements and the cost of money for call options as discussed under Derivative Income (Loss)
above. Call option settlements totaled $35.9 million in 2008, $155.3 million in 2007 and $68.5
million in 2006. The cost of money for call options increased to $128.1 million in 2008, $108.0
million in 2007 and $72.8 million in 2006.
Benefits and expenses decreased in 2008 and increased in 2007 primarily due to changes in index
credits, partially offset by the impact of unlocking. Index credits totaling $35.5 million in
2008, $154.0 million in 2007 and $71.2 million in 2006 were primarily impacted by changes in the
underlying market indices. These changes were partially offset by the impact of unlocking
adjustments, which increased amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales
inducements $28.7 million in 2008, and decreased amortization $1.9 million in 2007 and less than
52
$0.1 million in 2006. Growth in the volume of business in force also increased benefits and
expenses in 2008 and 2007. The impact of unlocking in 2008 was primarily due to updating the
amortization models for the increase in surrenders and withdrawals discussed above.
Premiums collected from the independent channel decreased in 2008 as a result of crediting rate and
other actions taken to preserve capital in the second half of 2008, partially offset by a more
favorable market environment for traditional annuity products. Direct premiums collected decreased
in 2007, primarily due to a more favorable market environment during 2006 for the sale of our
multi-year guaranteed annuity product combined with a competitive environment for index annuity
sales in 2007. We also took actions to further increase the profitability of our products in 2007.
The weighted average yield on cash and invested assets increased in 2008 and decreased in 2007
primarily due to the impact of changes in market investment rates, as discussed under Net
Investment Income above. These changes were partially offset by fee income (loss) from bond
calls, tender offers, mortgage loan prepayments and the change of net discount accretion on
mortgage and asset-backed securities totaling ($0.4) million in 2008, $0.7 million in 2007 and $2.1
million in 2006. The weighted average crediting rate increased in 2008 due to the sale of products
with higher crediting rates and increases in option costs. The decrease in spread is due to lower
spreads on assumed business and a shift in business to our multi-year guaranteed annuity which has
a lower spread target than other products in our portfolio. In addition, in the second half of
2008, we retained a higher amount of cash and short-term investments due to the volatile financial
markets limiting the availability of high quality fixed maturity securities and our desire to
maintain a more liquid position that would provide greater flexibility for managing in these
unprecedented economic times.
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive product charges |
|
$ |
47,687 |
|
|
$ |
46,180 |
|
|
$ |
44,997 |
|
Traditional life insurance premiums and other income |
|
|
149,153 |
|
|
|
144,682 |
|
|
|
138,401 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
143,324 |
|
|
|
144,231 |
|
|
|
142,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,164 |
|
|
|
335,093 |
|
|
|
326,018 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
287,105 |
|
|
|
276,408 |
|
|
|
267,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
$ |
53,059 |
|
|
$ |
58,685 |
|
|
$ |
58,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life premiums collected, net of reinsurance |
|
$ |
202,845 |
|
|
$ |
197,599 |
|
|
$ |
187,649 |
|
Policy liabilities and accruals, end of year |
|
|
2,227,338 |
|
|
|
2,168,445 |
|
|
|
2,131,548 |
|
Direct life insurance in force, end of year (in millions) |
|
|
35,815 |
|
|
|
33,246 |
|
|
|
30,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive life insurance spread: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on cash and invested assets |
|
|
6.63 |
% |
|
|
6.83 |
% |
|
|
6.85 |
% |
Weighted average interest crediting rate |
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
|
4.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread |
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income for the Traditional and Universal Life Insurance segment decreased 9.6% in
2008 to $53.1 million and decreased less than 0.1% in 2007 to $58.7 million. The impact of an
increase in the volume of business in force contributed to pre-tax operating income in 2008, 2007
and 2006. In 2008, this increase, combined with a decrease in dividends to participating
policyholders, was offset by higher death benefits and a reduction in prepayment fee income. The
decrease in pre-tax income in 2007 was primarily due to the impact of unlocking on deferred policy
acquisition cost and the value of insurance in force acquired, partially offset by lower death
benefits and increased spreads on our interest sensitive life business.
Traditional life insurance premiums increased in 2008 and 2007 primarily due to sales of life
products by our Farm Bureau Life agency force. The decrease in net investment income in 2008 is
primarily due to the impact of fee income from bond calls, tender offers and mortgage loan
prepayments and the change of net discount accretion on mortgage and asset-backed securities
totaling $1.7 million in 2008, $2.9 million in 2007 and $2.8 million in 2006.
53
Net investment income was positively impacted in 2008 and 2007 by an increase in invested assets,
principally due to net premium inflows, partially offset by market investment rates being lower
than our investment portfolio yield or yield on investments maturing or being paid down.
Death benefits totaled $91.0 million in 2008, $77.3 million in 2007 and $81.2 million in 2006.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and the value of insurance in force decreased in
2008 and increased in 2007 primarily due the impact of unlocking, which increased amortization $0.3
million in 2008 and $2.4 million in 2007 and decreased amortization $1.2 million in 2006. In
addition, amortization was impacted by changes in gross margins due to fluctuations in mortality
and traditional life premiums.
The changes in the weighted average yield on cash and invested assets are attributable to the items
affecting net investment income noted above. The decrease in weighted average interest crediting
rate in 2007 is due to a decrease in credited rates on our direct business.
Variable Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive product charges |
|
$ |
48,209 |
|
|
$ |
46,790 |
|
|
$ |
43,334 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
14,257 |
|
|
|
13,658 |
|
|
|
14,437 |
|
Other income |
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
2,932 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,384 |
|
|
|
63,380 |
|
|
|
59,010 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
65,968 |
|
|
|
50,866 |
|
|
|
55,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,584 |
) |
|
$ |
12,514 |
|
|
$ |
3,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable premiums collected, net of reinsurance |
|
$ |
136,971 |
|
|
$ |
181,309 |
|
|
$ |
154,651 |
|
Policy liabilities and accruals, end of year |
|
|
255,921 |
|
|
|
229,196 |
|
|
|
237,343 |
|
Separate account assets, end of year |
|
|
577,419 |
|
|
|
862,738 |
|
|
|
764,377 |
|
Direct life insurance in force, end of year (in millions) |
|
|
7,698 |
|
|
|
7,846 |
|
|
|
7,704 |
|
Pre-tax operating income (loss) for the Variable segment totaled ($1.6) million in 2008, $12.5
million in 2007 and $3.6 million in 2006. The loss in 2008 is primarily due to an increase in
death benefits and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, partially offset by an
increase in interest sensitive product charges. The increase in 2007 is primarily due to an
increase in the volume of business in force and a decrease in death benefits.
Interest sensitive product charges increased in 2008 from 2007 primarily due to the impact of the
aging of business in force. Cost of insurance charges increased 5.4% to $29.7 million in 2008 and
5.4% to $28.2 million in 2007. Death benefits in excess of related account values on variable
policies increased 54.6% to $16.3 million in 2008 and decreased 28.3% to $10.5 million in 2007.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased $8.0 million in 2008 due to the impact
of negative separate account performance in 2008 and updating the amortization model for the
current volume of business in force.
Variable premiums tend to vary with the volatility, performance of and confidence level in the
equity markets as well as crediting and interest rates on competing products, including fixed rate
annuities and bank-offered certificates of deposit. The S&P 500 Index decreased 38.5% in 2008, and
increased 3.5% in 2007 and 13.6% in 2006.
54
Corporate and Other Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax operating loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
9,855 |
|
|
$ |
14,744 |
|
|
$ |
7,140 |
|
Other income |
|
|
23,158 |
|
|
|
23,607 |
|
|
|
22,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,013 |
|
|
|
38,351 |
|
|
|
29,673 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
19,567 |
|
|
|
16,666 |
|
|
|
11,744 |
|
Benefits and other expenses |
|
|
25,887 |
|
|
|
26,116 |
|
|
|
23,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,441 |
) |
|
|
(4,431 |
) |
|
|
(5,556 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
Equity income, before tax |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
2,362 |
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating loss |
|
$ |
(12,377 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,020 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating loss totaled $12.4 million in 2008 compared to $2.0 million in 2007 and $3.9
million in 2006. Net investment income decreased in 2008 due to decreases in average invested
assets and short-term market interest rates. Average invested assets decreased due to transfers to
meet the capital needs of other operating segments during the year, partially offset by proceeds
from debt borrowings. In addition, net investment income was lower in 2008 due to our desire to
maintain a more liquid portfolio during the fourth quarter. Net investment income increased in
2007 due to an increase in invested assets, primarily from the proceeds of the 2017 Senior Notes.
The changes in other income and other expense are primarily due to operating results of our
non-insurance operations. These operations include management, advisory, marketing and
distribution services and leasing activities. The changes in equity income are discussed in the
Equity Income section above.
Interest expense increased in 2008 and 2007 due to an increase in our average debt outstanding
resulting from additional debt borrowings as discussed in the Interest Expense section above.
Financial Condition
Investments
We account for our investments in accordance with Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.
Statement No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
the required disclosures about fair value measurements. See further discussion of Statement No.
157 in the Accounting Changes section that follows and Note 4 to our consolidated financial
statements.
Our total investment portfolio decreased 1.9% to $10,854.1 million at December 31, 2008 compared to
$11,067.1 million at December 31, 2007. This decrease is primarily the result of an increase in
unrealized depreciation on fixed maturity securities classified as available for sale and a
decrease in the value of our derivatives, partially offset by net cash received from interest
sensitive and index products and proceeds from issuance of the 2011 Senior Notes in November 2008.
Net unrealized depreciation of fixed maturity securities increased $1,399.2 million during 2008 to
a net unrealized loss of $1,539.6 million at December 31, 2008, principally due to the impact of a
general widening of credit spreads, partially offset by a decrease in risk-free interest rates and
write-downs for other-than-temporary impairments recorded in 2008. We believe credit spreads
widened primarily due to the continued deterioration of the U.S. housing market, tightened lending
conditions and decreased liquidity in the market. In addition, there is a severe global recession
which has caused significant market strain. Early steps taken by the government to stabilize the
financial system have proven ineffective and pressures on the financial system continued to build
throughout 2008. Details regarding the investment impairments are discussed above in the
Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investments section under Results of Operations.
Additional details regarding securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2008 are
included in the discussion that follows and in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
Internal investment professionals manage our investment portfolio. The investment strategy is
designed to achieve superior risk-adjusted returns consistent with the investment philosophy of
maintaining a largely investment grade portfolio and providing adequate liquidity for obligations
to policyholders and other requirements.
55
Investment Portfolio Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed maturities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public |
|
$ |
7,406,964 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
% |
|
$ |
7,866,990 |
|
|
|
71.1 |
% |
144A private placement |
|
|
1,164,417 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
1,318,181 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
Private placement |
|
|
394,062 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
337,421 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities available
for sale |
|
|
8,965,443 |
|
|
|
82.6 |
|
|
|
9,522,592 |
|
|
|
86.0 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
44,863 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
23,633 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
1,221,573 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
43,918 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Investment real estate |
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
Policy loans |
|
|
182,421 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
179,490 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
262,459 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
72,005 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
10,854,059 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
11,067,070 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, 96.2% (based on carrying value) of the available-for-sale fixed maturity
securities were investment grade debt securities, defined as being in the highest two National
Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) designations. Non-investment grade debt securities
generally provide higher yields and involve greater risks than investment grade debt securities
because their issuers typically are more highly leveraged and more vulnerable to adverse economic
conditions than investment grade issuers. In addition, the trading market for these securities is
usually more limited than for investment grade debt securities. We regularly review the percentage
of our portfolio that is invested in non-investment grade debt securities (NAIC designations 3
through 6). As of December 31, 2008, the investment in non-investment grade debt was 3.8% of
available-for-sale fixed maturity securities. At that time, no single non-investment grade holding
exceeded 0.2% of total investments.
Credit Quality by NAIC Designation and Standard & Poors (S&P) Rating Equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAIC |
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Designation |
|
Equivalent S&P Ratings (1) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
1 |
|
AAA, AA, A |
|
$ |
5,382,110 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,056,231 |
|
|
|
63.6 |
% |
2 |
|
BBB |
|
|
3,243,034 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
3,100,795 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
8,625,144 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
|
|
|
9,157,026 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
|
3 |
|
BB |
|
|
244,814 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
264,070 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
4 |
|
B |
|
|
40,565 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
64,700 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
5 |
|
CCC, CC, C |
|
|
43,064 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
36,314 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
6 |
|
In or near default |
|
|
11,856 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total below investment grade |
|
|
340,299 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
365,566 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
available for sale |
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
9,522,592 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Securities Valuation Office of the NAIC generally rates private placement
securities. Comparisons between NAIC designations and S&P ratings are published by the
NAIC. S&P has not rated some of the fixed maturity securities in our portfolio. |
56
Gross Unrealized Gains and Gross Unrealized Losses by Internal Industry Classification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
with Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
with Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services |
|
$ |
1,246,895 |
|
|
$ |
114,067 |
|
|
$ |
4,806 |
|
|
$ |
1,132,828 |
|
|
$ |
(547,594 |
) |
Manufacturing |
|
|
1,211,102 |
|
|
|
289,093 |
|
|
|
11,187 |
|
|
|
922,009 |
|
|
|
(183,439 |
) |
Mining |
|
|
469,935 |
|
|
|
24,521 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
445,414 |
|
|
|
(73,562 |
) |
Retail trade |
|
|
104,379 |
|
|
|
24,170 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
80,209 |
|
|
|
(16,819 |
) |
Services |
|
|
184,528 |
|
|
|
42,850 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
141,678 |
|
|
|
(28,796 |
) |
Transportation |
|
|
177,844 |
|
|
|
52,034 |
|
|
|
6,849 |
|
|
|
125,810 |
|
|
|
(20,253 |
) |
Utilities |
|
|
1,279,641 |
|
|
|
299,537 |
|
|
|
16,623 |
|
|
|
980,104 |
|
|
|
(135,654 |
) |
Other |
|
|
159,831 |
|
|
|
52,252 |
|
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
107,579 |
|
|
|
(21,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate securities |
|
|
4,834,155 |
|
|
|
898,524 |
|
|
|
46,177 |
|
|
|
3,935,631 |
|
|
|
(1,027,392 |
) |
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
2,569,769 |
|
|
|
975,193 |
|
|
|
46,573 |
|
|
|
1,594,576 |
|
|
|
(478,994 |
) |
United States Government and agencies |
|
|
250,893 |
|
|
|
217,379 |
|
|
|
12,891 |
|
|
|
33,514 |
|
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
State, municipal and other governments |
|
|
1,310,626 |
|
|
|
142,107 |
|
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
1,168,519 |
|
|
|
(139,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
$ |
2,233,203 |
|
|
$ |
110,206 |
|
|
$ |
6,732,240 |
|
|
$ |
(1,649,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
with Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
with Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services |
|
$ |
1,826,956 |
|
|
$ |
720,244 |
|
|
$ |
25,480 |
|
|
$ |
1,106,712 |
|
|
$ |
(91,717 |
) |
Manufacturing |
|
|
1,089,836 |
|
|
|
582,073 |
|
|
|
23,726 |
|
|
|
507,763 |
|
|
|
(31,703 |
) |
Mining |
|
|
434,459 |
|
|
|
265,921 |
|
|
|
10,149 |
|
|
|
168,538 |
|
|
|
(7,738 |
) |
Retail trade |
|
|
115,178 |
|
|
|
71,302 |
|
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
|
43,876 |
|
|
|
(3,336 |
) |
Services |
|
|
171,913 |
|
|
|
108,239 |
|
|
|
4,818 |
|
|
|
63,674 |
|
|
|
(3,550 |
) |
Transportation |
|
|
187,513 |
|
|
|
93,600 |
|
|
|
6,266 |
|
|
|
93,913 |
|
|
|
(5,460 |
) |
Utilities |
|
|
1,115,319 |
|
|
|
640,827 |
|
|
|
26,962 |
|
|
|
474,492 |
|
|
|
(19,599 |
) |
Other |
|
|
88,206 |
|
|
|
50,289 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
37,917 |
|
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate securities |
|
|
5,029,380 |
|
|
|
2,532,495 |
|
|
|
103,057 |
|
|
|
2,496,885 |
|
|
|
(164,814 |
) |
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
2,685,973 |
|
|
|
955,176 |
|
|
|
16,052 |
|
|
|
1,730,797 |
|
|
|
(102,631 |
) |
United States Government and agencies |
|
|
554,340 |
|
|
|
405,936 |
|
|
|
8,454 |
|
|
|
148,404 |
|
|
|
(4,524 |
) |
State, municipal and other governments |
|
|
1,252,899 |
|
|
|
723,326 |
|
|
|
19,118 |
|
|
|
529,573 |
|
|
|
(15,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,522,592 |
|
|
$ |
4,616,933 |
|
|
$ |
146,681 |
|
|
$ |
4,905,659 |
|
|
$ |
(287,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
Credit Quality of Available-For-Sale Fixed Maturity Securities with Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
NAIC |
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Percent |
|
Designation |
|
Equivalent S&P Ratings |
|
Losses |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
1 |
|
AAA, AA, A |
|
$ |
3,545,103 |
|
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
$ |
(740,675 |
) |
|
|
44.9 |
% |
2 |
|
BBB |
|
|
2,890,656 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
(738,512 |
) |
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
6,435,759 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
|
|
|
(1,479,187 |
) |
|
|
89.7 |
|
3 |
|
BB |
|
|
212,438 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(70,545 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
|
4 |
|
B |
|
|
37,399 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(45,228 |
) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
5 |
|
CCC, CC, C |
|
|
40,308 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(47,615 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
6 |
|
In or near default |
|
|
6,336 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(7,272 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total below investment grade |
|
|
296,481 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(170,660 |
) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,732,240 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,649,847 |
) |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
NAIC |
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Percent |
|
Designation |
|
Equivalent S&P Ratings |
|
Losses |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
1 |
|
AAA, AA, A |
|
$ |
3,113,384 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
% |
|
$ |
(172,016 |
) |
|
|
59.9 |
% |
2 |
|
BBB |
|
|
1,605,652 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
(89,572 |
) |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
4,719,036 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
|
|
|
(261,588 |
) |
|
|
91.1 |
|
3 |
|
BB |
|
|
130,043 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(13,533 |
) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
4 |
|
B |
|
|
26,633 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(5,335 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
5 |
|
CCC, CC, C |
|
|
29,947 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(6,619 |
) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
6 |
|
In or near default |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total below investment grade |
|
|
186,623 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(25,487 |
) |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,905,659 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(287,075 |
) |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale Fixed Maturity Securities with Unrealized Losses by Length of Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Market Value is |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Market Value is |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
is Less than |
|
|
75% or Greater |
|
|
is Less than |
|
|
75% or Greater |
|
|
|
of Issuers |
|
|
75% of Cost |
|
|
than Cost |
|
|
75% of Cost |
|
|
than Cost |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
170 |
|
|
$ |
31,774 |
|
|
$ |
784,689 |
|
|
$ |
(12,658 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,824 |
) |
Greater than three months to six months |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
75,356 |
|
|
|
1,024,158 |
|
|
|
(28,791 |
) |
|
|
(82,320 |
) |
Greater than six months to nine months |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
182,184 |
|
|
|
1,140,978 |
|
|
|
(56,719 |
) |
|
|
(111,013 |
) |
Greater than nine months to twelve
months |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
288,140 |
|
|
|
780,947 |
|
|
|
(103,539 |
) |
|
|
(97,928 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
1,733,949 |
|
|
|
2,339,912 |
|
|
|
(785,180 |
) |
|
|
(319,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,311,403 |
|
|
$ |
6,070,684 |
|
|
$ |
(986,887 |
) |
|
$ |
(662,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Market Value is |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Market Value is |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
is Less than |
|
|
75% or Greater |
|
|
is Less than |
|
|
75% or Greater |
|
|
|
of Issuers |
|
|
75% of Cost |
|
|
than Cost |
|
|
75% of Cost |
|
|
than Cost |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
82 |
|
|
$ |
3,998 |
|
|
$ |
567,265 |
|
|
$ |
(1,140 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,874 |
) |
Greater than three months to six months |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
12,022 |
|
|
|
195,483 |
|
|
|
(3,164 |
) |
|
|
(9,828 |
) |
Greater than six months to nine months |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
39,900 |
|
|
|
972,367 |
|
|
|
(12,795 |
) |
|
|
(49,754 |
) |
Greater than nine months to twelve
months |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
298,247 |
|
|
|
(1,375 |
) |
|
|
(12,843 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
74,182 |
|
|
|
3,026,660 |
|
|
|
(29,496 |
) |
|
|
(153,806 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132,712 |
|
|
$ |
5,060,022 |
|
|
$ |
(47,970 |
) |
|
$ |
(239,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
Available-For-Sale Fixed Maturity Securities with Unrealized Losses by Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Carrying Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Securities with |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
43,483 |
|
|
$ |
(4,985 |
) |
|
$ |
4,697 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
791,636 |
|
|
|
(143,559 |
) |
|
|
206,405 |
|
|
|
(10,436 |
) |
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
2,037,451 |
|
|
|
(514,869 |
) |
|
|
1,205,663 |
|
|
|
(66,342 |
) |
Due after ten years |
|
|
2,260,568 |
|
|
|
(506,966 |
) |
|
|
1,747,686 |
|
|
|
(106,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,133,138 |
|
|
|
(1,170,379 |
) |
|
|
3,164,451 |
|
|
|
(182,855 |
) |
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,594,576 |
|
|
|
(478,994 |
) |
|
|
1,730,797 |
|
|
|
(102,631 |
) |
Redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
10,411 |
|
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,732,240 |
|
|
$ |
(1,649,847 |
) |
|
$ |
4,905,659 |
|
|
$ |
(287,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, unrealized losses on available-for-sale fixed maturity securities totaled
$1,649.8 million primarily due to $1,027.4 million in unrealized losses on corporate securities.
The unrealized losses on corporate securities were primarily due to:
|
|
|
increased credit spreads on commercial real estate investment trust bonds, due to the
underlying real estate exposure and market concerns about the ability to access capital
markets, |
|
|
|
|
increased credit spreads and defaults in collateralized debt obligations, |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in market liquidity and credit quality concerns of assets held by banking
institutions and |
|
|
|
|
increased credit spreads from weaker operating results in the manufacturing sector. |
In addition, the unrealized losses on mortgage and asset-backed securities totaling $479.0 million,
were primarily due an increase in credit spreads and decrease in market liquidity resulting from
concerns about mortgage defaults on subprime and other risky mortgages and potential downgrades or
defaults of monoline bond insurers. We have the ability and intent to hold these investments until
a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, therefore we do not consider these investments to
be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008. See
Note 2 to our consolidated financial
statements for additional analysis of these unrealized losses.
Available-For-Sale Fixed Maturity Securities by Contractual Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
117,268 |
|
|
$ |
113,169 |
|
|
$ |
63,476 |
|
|
$ |
63,980 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
1,182,860 |
|
|
|
1,045,741 |
|
|
|
881,754 |
|
|
|
895,729 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
2,949,740 |
|
|
|
2,458,698 |
|
|
|
2,441,018 |
|
|
|
2,411,240 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
3,248,026 |
|
|
|
2,773,540 |
|
|
|
3,470,968 |
|
|
|
3,432,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,497,894 |
|
|
|
6,391,148 |
|
|
|
6,857,216 |
|
|
|
6,803,621 |
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
3,002,190 |
|
|
|
2,569,769 |
|
|
|
2,772,552 |
|
|
|
2,685,973 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
33,218 |
|
|
|
32,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,505,084 |
|
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
$ |
9,662,986 |
|
|
$ |
9,522,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to
call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Mortgage and Asset-Backed Securities
Mortgage and asset-backed securities comprised 28.7% at December 31, 2008 and 28.2% at December 31,
2007 of our total available-for-sale fixed maturity securities. These securities are purchased
when we believe these types of investments provide superior risk-adjusted returns compared to
returns of more conventional investments such as corporate bonds and mortgage loans. These
securities are diversified as to collateral types, cash flow characteristics and maturity.
The repayment pattern on mortgage and other asset-backed securities is more variable than that of
more traditional fixed maturity securities because the repayment terms are tied to underlying debt
obligations that are subject to
59
prepayments. The prepayment speeds (e.g., the rate of individuals refinancing their home
mortgages) can vary based on a number of economic factors that cannot be predicted with certainty.
These factors include the prevailing interest rate environment and general status of the economy.
At each balance sheet date, we review and update our expectation of future prepayment speeds and
the book value of the mortgage and other asset-backed securities purchased at a premium or discount
is reset, if needed, to result in a constant effective yield over the life of the security. This
effective yield is computed using historical principal payments and expected future principal
payment patterns. Any adjustments to book value to derive the constant effective yield, which may
include the reversal of premium or discount amounts previously amortized or accrued, are recorded
in the current period as a component of net investment income. Accordingly, deviations in actual
prepayment speeds from that originally expected or changes in expected prepayment speeds can cause
a change in the yield earned on mortgage and asset-backed securities purchased at a premium or
discount and may result in adjustments that have a material positive or negative impact on reported
results. Increases in prepayment speeds, which typically occur in a decreasing interest rate
environment, generally increase the rate at which discount is accrued and premium is amortized into
income. Decreases in prepayment speeds, which typically occur in an increasing interest rate
environment, generally slow down the rate at which these amounts are recorded into income.
Mortgage and Asset-Backed Securities by Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Fixed |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequential |
|
$ |
1,237,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,264,691 |
|
|
$ |
1,068,869 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
Pass-through |
|
|
219,447 |
|
|
|
219,855 |
|
|
|
225,513 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Planned and targeted amortization class |
|
|
508,133 |
|
|
|
513,373 |
|
|
|
464,296 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
40,086 |
|
|
|
40,184 |
|
|
|
31,011 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,004,701 |
|
|
|
2,038,103 |
|
|
|
1,789,689 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
799,546 |
|
|
|
819,030 |
|
|
|
640,236 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
197,943 |
|
|
|
265,435 |
|
|
|
139,844 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
$ |
3,002,190 |
|
|
$ |
3,122,568 |
|
|
$ |
2,569,769 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Fixed |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequential |
|
$ |
1,186,016 |
|
|
$ |
1,211,070 |
|
|
$ |
1,153,555 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
Pass-through |
|
|
199,854 |
|
|
|
200,024 |
|
|
|
200,900 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Planned and targeted amortization class |
|
|
479,194 |
|
|
|
484,620 |
|
|
|
473,094 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
40,704 |
|
|
|
40,798 |
|
|
|
36,521 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,905,768 |
|
|
|
1,936,512 |
|
|
|
1,864,070 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
578,510 |
|
|
|
578,416 |
|
|
|
570,057 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
288,274 |
|
|
|
289,173 |
|
|
|
251,846 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
$ |
2,772,552 |
|
|
$ |
2,804,101 |
|
|
$ |
2,685,973 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The residential mortgage-backed portfolio includes pass-through and collateralized mortgage
obligation (CMO) securities. With a pass-through security, we receive a pro rata share of
principal payments as payments are made on the underlying mortgage loans. CMOs consist of pools of
mortgages divided into sections or tranches which provide sequential retirement of the bonds. We
invest in sequential tranches which provide cash flow stability in that principal payments do not
occur until the previous tranches are paid off. In addition, to provide call protection and more
stable average lives, we invest in CMOs such as planned amortization class (PAC) and targeted
amortization class (TAC) securities. CMOs of these types provide more predictable cash flows
within a range of prepayment speeds by shifting the prepayment risks to support tranches. We
generally do not purchase certain types of CMOs that we believe would subject the investment
portfolio to greater than average risk. These include, but are not limited to, principal only,
floater, inverse floater, PAC II and support tranches.
60
The commercial and other asset-backed securities are primarily sequential securities. Commercial
mortgage-backed securities typically have cash flows that are less sensitive to interest rate
changes than residential securities of similar types due principally to prepayment restrictions on
many of the underlying commercial mortgage loans. The other asset-backed securities, whose
collateral is primarily second lien, fixed rate home-equity loans, are also less sensitive to
interest rate changes due to the borrowers typically having less ability to refinance as compared
to homeowners with a first lien mortgage only.
The mortgage and asset-backed portfolios include securities with exposure to the Alt-A and subprime
home equity loan sectors. Securities with Alt-A and subprime exposure are backed by loans to
borrowers with credit scores below those of prime grade borrowers. Prior to 2008, we based our
definition of Prime, Alt-A and subprime securities primarily on credit scores, whereby Alt-A
securities included borrowers with credit scores ranging from 725 to 641 and subprime securities
included borrowers with credit scores of 640 or less. During 2008, we refined our definitions to
be more aligned with others in the industry and we now consider owner occupancy, the level of
documentation, and quality of collateral, in addition to credit scores, for determining the
appropriate classification of the securities in the portfolio. We believe the revised
classifications are more appropriate as a securitys performance is highly dependent on the quality
of the borrower. This refinement resulted in the reclassification from Alt-A to prime of
securities from the 2003 origination year that had a fair value of $167.4 million at December 31,
2007.
Our direct exposure to the Alt-A home equity and subprime first-lien loan sectors is limited to
investments in structured securities collateralized by senior tranches of residential mortgage
loans with this exposure. We do not own any direct investments in subprime lenders or adjustable
rate mortgages.
Mortgage and Asset-Backed Securities by Collateral Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
of Fixed |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
of Fixed |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Government agency |
|
$ |
557,311 |
|
|
$ |
579,489 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
$ |
423,831 |
|
|
$ |
427,097 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Prime |
|
|
1,068,716 |
|
|
|
913,772 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
1,098,484 |
|
|
|
1,068,460 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Alt-A |
|
|
524,264 |
|
|
|
397,556 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
611,399 |
|
|
|
561,443 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
30,133 |
|
|
|
20,311 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
30,146 |
|
|
|
29,259 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
799,546 |
|
|
|
640,236 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
578,510 |
|
|
|
570,057 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Non-mortgage |
|
|
22,220 |
|
|
|
18,405 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
30,182 |
|
|
|
29,657 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,002,190 |
|
|
$ |
2,569,769 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2,772,552 |
|
|
$ |
2,685,973 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
The mortgage and asset-backed securities can be summarized into three broad categories:
residential, commercial and other asset-backed securities.
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities by Collateral Type and Origination Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Government & Prime |
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
63,195 |
|
|
$ |
67,391 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,195 |
|
|
$ |
67,391 |
|
2007 |
|
|
120,089 |
|
|
|
117,851 |
|
|
|
60,265 |
|
|
|
32,723 |
|
|
|
180,354 |
|
|
|
150,574 |
|
2006 |
|
|
117,671 |
|
|
|
106,016 |
|
|
|
22,436 |
|
|
|
11,099 |
|
|
|
140,107 |
|
|
|
117,115 |
|
2005 |
|
|
28,517 |
|
|
|
27,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,517 |
|
|
|
27,581 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
1,273,488 |
|
|
|
1,162,275 |
|
|
|
319,040 |
|
|
|
264,753 |
|
|
|
1,592,528 |
|
|
|
1,427,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,602,960 |
|
|
$ |
1,481,114 |
|
|
$ |
401,741 |
|
|
$ |
308,575 |
|
|
$ |
2,004,701 |
|
|
$ |
1,789,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Government & Prime |
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
100,400 |
|
|
$ |
101,344 |
|
|
$ |
60,235 |
|
|
$ |
58,313 |
|
|
$ |
160,635 |
|
|
$ |
159,657 |
|
2006 |
|
|
94,081 |
|
|
|
94,749 |
|
|
|
22,438 |
|
|
|
19,361 |
|
|
|
116,519 |
|
|
|
114,110 |
|
2005 |
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
29,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
29,446 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
1,275,024 |
|
|
|
1,247,272 |
|
|
|
324,390 |
|
|
|
313,585 |
|
|
|
1,599,414 |
|
|
|
1,560,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,498,705 |
|
|
$ |
1,472,811 |
|
|
$ |
407,063 |
|
|
$ |
391,259 |
|
|
$ |
1,905,768 |
|
|
$ |
1,864,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Insurance on 2006 Alt-A issues is provided by MBIA Insurance Corporation (78% in 2008 and
2007). Insurance on 2007 Alt-A issues is provided by Assured Guaranty Ltd. (32% in 2008 and
2007) and MBIA Insurance Corporation (25% in 2008 and 2007). There is no insurance coverage
on Government & Prime investments or Alt-A investments with collateral originating prior to
2006. |
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities by Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent of Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent of Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
1,721,046 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,864,039 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
AA |
|
|
3,462 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
24,121 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB |
|
|
7,281 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB |
|
|
17,326 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
16,453 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,789,689 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,864,070 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities by Origination Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
197,725 |
|
|
$ |
196,908 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
194,169 |
|
|
|
114,816 |
|
|
|
186,701 |
|
|
|
187,027 |
|
2006 |
|
|
170,452 |
|
|
|
117,606 |
|
|
|
146,924 |
|
|
|
143,523 |
|
2005 |
|
|
56,220 |
|
|
|
41,877 |
|
|
|
52,273 |
|
|
|
45,022 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
180,980 |
|
|
|
169,029 |
|
|
|
192,612 |
|
|
|
194,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
799,546 |
|
|
$ |
640,236 |
|
|
$ |
578,510 |
|
|
$ |
570,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities by Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent of Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent of Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
GNMA |
|
$ |
386,634 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
% |
|
$ |
196,042 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
% |
FNMA |
|
|
15,611 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
16,407 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
AAA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generic AAA |
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
30,306 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Super Senior AAA |
|
|
103,951 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
106,448 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
Mezzanine AAA |
|
|
62,823 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
52,460 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Junior AAA |
|
|
41,662 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
127,209 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AAA |
|
|
209,610 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
316,423 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA |
|
|
14,682 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
19,636 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
A |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
21,549 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
BBB |
|
|
9,349 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCC |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
640,236 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
570,057 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae), guarantees principal and interest on
mortgage backed securities. The guarantee is backed by the full faith and credit of the United
States Government. The Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA or Fannie Mae) and the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Association (FHLMC or Freddie Mac), are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)
that were chartered by Congress to reduce borrowing costs for certain homeowners. GSEs have
carried an implicit backing of the U.S. Government but do not have explicit guarantees like GNMA.
The Housing and Economic Recovery act of 2008 allows the government to expand its line of credit to
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and gives the U.S. Treasury the power to purchase an equity stake in the
firms through the end of 2009.
The AAA rated commercial mortgage-backed securities are broken down into categories based on
subordination levels. Rating agencies disclose subordination levels, which measure of the amount
of credit support that the bonds (or tranches) have from subordinated bonds (or tranches). Generic
AAA is a term used for securities issued prior to 2005. The super senior securities have
subordination levels greater than 27%, the mezzanine securities have subordination levels in the
17-27% range and the junior securities have subordination levels in the 9-17% range.
Other Asset-Backed Securities by Collateral Type and Origination Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Government & Prime |
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
Non-Mortgage |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
9,989 |
|
|
$ |
2,820 |
|
|
$ |
17,442 |
|
|
$ |
9,140 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,091 |
|
|
$ |
4,465 |
|
|
$ |
34,522 |
|
|
$ |
16,425 |
|
2006 |
|
|
9,726 |
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
66,826 |
|
|
|
45,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,552 |
|
|
|
51,706 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,653 |
|
|
|
25,068 |
|
|
|
30,133 |
|
|
|
20,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,786 |
|
|
|
45,379 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
3,352 |
|
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
11,602 |
|
|
|
9,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,129 |
|
|
|
13,940 |
|
|
|
30,083 |
|
|
|
26,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
23,067 |
|
|
$ |
12,147 |
|
|
$ |
122,523 |
|
|
$ |
88,981 |
|
|
$ |
30,133 |
|
|
$ |
20,311 |
|
|
$ |
22,220 |
|
|
$ |
18,405 |
|
|
$ |
197,943 |
|
|
$ |
139,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Government & Prime |
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
Non-Mortgage |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
9,995 |
|
|
$ |
9,172 |
|
|
$ |
30,979 |
|
|
$ |
27,501 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,861 |
|
|
$ |
6,908 |
|
|
$ |
47,835 |
|
|
$ |
43,581 |
|
2006 |
|
|
9,746 |
|
|
|
9,659 |
|
|
|
135,575 |
|
|
|
106,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,321 |
|
|
|
116,193 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,937 |
|
|
|
25,719 |
|
|
|
30,146 |
|
|
|
29,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,083 |
|
|
|
54,978 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
3,869 |
|
|
|
3,915 |
|
|
|
10,845 |
|
|
|
10,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,321 |
|
|
|
22,749 |
|
|
|
38,035 |
|
|
|
37,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
23,610 |
|
|
$ |
22,746 |
|
|
$ |
204,336 |
|
|
$ |
170,184 |
|
|
$ |
30,146 |
|
|
$ |
29,259 |
|
|
$ |
30,182 |
|
|
$ |
29,657 |
|
|
$ |
288,274 |
|
|
$ |
251,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Insurance on 2006 Alt-A issues is provided by Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. (38% in 2008
and 63% in 2007) and AMBAC Assurance Corporation (34% in 2008 and 17% in 2007). Insurance on
2007 Alt-A issues is provided by AMBAC Assurance Corporation (57% in 2008 and 32% in 2007),
MBIA Insurance Corporation (29% in 2008 and 16% in 2007) and Financial Guaranty Insurance Co.
(14% in 2008 and 48% in 2007). The |
63
2006 and 2007 Government & Prime issues are 100% insured by AMBAC Assurance Corporation (2006
issues) and MBIA Insurance Corporation (2007 issues). There is no insurance coverage on other
asset-backed securities with non-mortgage collateral or collateral originating prior to 2006.
Other Asset-Backed Securities by Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
59,900 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
% |
|
$ |
226,282 |
|
|
|
89.9 |
% |
AA |
|
|
18,852 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
13,621 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
A |
|
|
3,015 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
BBB |
|
|
36,337 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
BB |
|
|
11,666 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCC |
|
|
4,894 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC |
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
139,844 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
251,846 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The mortgage and asset-backed portfolios include securities wrapped by monoline bond insurers to
provide additional credit enhancement for the investment. We believe these securities were
underwritten at investment grade levels excluding any credit enhancing protection. At December 31,
2008, the fair value of our insured mortgage and asset-backed holdings totaled $83.5 million, or
3.3% of our mortgage and asset-backed portfolios and 0.9% of our total fixed income portfolio. The
amortized cost of these insured holdings decreased 33.5% from December 31, 2007 primarily due to
taking write downs for other-than-temporary impairments on a portion of other asset-backed
securities wrapped by Financial Guarantee Insurance Co. (FGIC). During 2008, FGIC was downgraded
by two rating agencies, homeowner delinquencies increased and collateral backing these issues
declined, increasing the probability that these securities may experience a cash flow shortfall.
We do not consider the investments wrapped by other monoline bond insurers to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008 because we do not have reason to believe that
those guarantees, if needed, will not be honored. In addition, we have the intent and ability to
hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity. We do not directly
own any fixed income or equity investments in monoline bond insurers.
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities and Other Asset-Backed Securities by Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Insurers |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
S&P |
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
Asset- |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
Asset- |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Rating (1) |
|
|
Backed |
|
|
Backed |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Backed |
|
|
Backed |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Insured: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMBAC Assurance
Corporation |
|
|
A |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,380 |
|
|
$ |
18,380 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,510 |
|
|
$ |
39,510 |
|
Assured Guaranty
Ltd. |
|
AAA |
|
|
11,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,608 |
|
|
|
18,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,773 |
|
Financial Guaranty
Insurance Co. |
|
CCC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,239 |
|
|
|
27,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,574 |
|
|
|
81,574 |
|
MBIA Insurance
Corporation |
|
AA |
|
|
15,762 |
|
|
|
10,558 |
|
|
|
26,320 |
|
|
|
29,222 |
|
|
|
24,112 |
|
|
|
53,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total with insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,370 |
|
|
|
56,177 |
|
|
|
83,547 |
|
|
|
47,995 |
|
|
|
145,196 |
|
|
|
193,191 |
|
Uninsured: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,682 |
|
|
|
172,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,291 |
|
FHLMC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,810 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
261,036 |
|
|
|
121,373 |
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
125,287 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,613 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
130,748 |
|
|
|
129,488 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
129,738 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,186,215 |
|
|
|
80,306 |
|
|
|
1,266,521 |
|
|
|
1,392,923 |
|
|
|
102,486 |
|
|
|
1,495,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,789,690 |
|
|
$ |
139,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,929,534 |
|
|
$ |
1,864,070 |
|
|
$ |
251,846 |
|
|
$ |
2,115,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rating in effect as of December 31, 2008. |
64
Collateralized Debt Obligations
Collateralized debt obligation investments are included in the corporate securities portfolio. Our
investments in collateralized debt obligations are backed by credit default swaps with no home
equity exposure. These securities had a carrying value of $7.4 million and unrealized loss of
$45.6 million at December 31, 2008 and a carrying value of $42.1 million and unrealized loss of
$9.9 million at December 31, 2007. The unrealized loss increased in 2008 primarily due to actual
defaults in the collateral, general spread widening and market concerns of increased defaults in
the future. Our investment professionals have stress tested all of these securities and determined
that future principal losses are not expected based on reasonably adverse conditions. Assuming a
35% recovery, on average these investments could all withstand seven to twelve more defaults
without losing any principal. The number of defaults is an estimate based on the remaining credit
enhancement (subordination) that remains in each security. Each default that occurs reduces
subordination to the security, depending on the loss amount and exposure. Depending on the
investment, the synthetic collateralized debt obligations we own have exposure to approximately 120
to 150 reference names, which results in an average default level of 5.0% to 10.0% before we would
lose principal. Based on historical performance and current economic conditions, we do not expect
future defaults will exceed these levels and believe the existing subordination is sufficient to
maintain the value of our investments. In addition, we have the intent and ability to hold these
investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, therefore we do not consider
these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008.
In addition, one collateralized debt obligation was partially backed by subprime mortgages and was
written down during the first and second quarters of 2008 to the estimated fair value of $0.2
million. This security had an amortized cost of $10.0 million and fair value of $1.5 million at
December 31, 2007. This security was sold during the third quarter of 2008 for the estimated fair
value of $0.2 million.
State, Municipal and Other Government Securities
State, municipal and other government securities include investments in general obligation,
revenue, military housing and municipal housing bonds. Our investment strategy is to utilize
municipal bonds in addition to corporate bonds, as we believe they provide additional
diversification and have historically low default rates compared with similarly rated corporate
bonds. We evaluate the credit strength of the underlying issues on both a quantitative and
qualitative basis, excluding insurance, prior to acquisition. The majority of the municipal bonds
we hold are investment grade credits without consideration of insurance. The insolvency of one or
more of the credit enhancing entities would be a meaningful short-term market liquidity event, but
would not dramatically increase our investment portfolios risk profile.
State, Municipal and Other Government Holdings by Insurance and Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Bonds by |
|
|
By Underlying |
|
|
Total Bonds by |
|
|
By Underlying |
|
|
|
Uninsured Bonds |
|
|
Insurer Rating |
|
|
Issue Rating |
|
|
Insurer Rating |
|
|
Issue Rating |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
% of |
|
Rating |
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
AAA (1) |
|
$ |
166,829 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
% |
|
$ |
198,432 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
$ |
4,850 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
$ |
365,261 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
% |
|
$ |
171,679 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
AA |
|
|
119,324 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
454,193 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
319,786 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
573,517 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
439,110 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
A |
|
|
29,505 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
310,695 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
361,165 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
340,200 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
390,670 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
BBB |
|
|
27,039 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
4,609 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
42,630 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
31,648 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
69,669 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
NR (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,498 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,498 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
342,697 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
967,929 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
967,929 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,310,626 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,310,626 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Bonds by |
|
|
By Underlying |
|
|
Total Bonds by |
|
|
By Underlying |
|
|
|
Uninsured Bonds |
|
|
Insurer Rating |
|
|
Issue Rating |
|
|
Insurer Rating |
|
|
Issue Rating |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
% of |
|
Rating |
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
AAA (1) |
|
$ |
146,483 |
|
|
|
48.4 |
% |
|
$ |
947,316 |
|
|
|
99.7 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
1,093,799 |
|
|
|
87.3 |
% |
|
$ |
146,483 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
AA |
|
|
112,912 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
316,797 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
115,987 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
429,709 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
A |
|
|
9,987 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302,980 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
9,987 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
312,967 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
BBB |
|
|
31,367 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,983 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
31,367 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
89,350 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
BB |
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
NR (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272,631 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272,631 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
302,508 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
950,391 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
950,391 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,252,899 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,252,899 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
AAA uninsured bonds includes $57.7 million in 2008 and $47.2 million in 2007 of bonds with
GNMA and/or FNMA collateral. |
|
(2) |
|
No formal public rating issued. Approximately 58% in 2008 and 53% in 2007 of the non-rated
securities relate to military housing bonds, which we believe have an A- shadow rating;
approximately 29% in 2008 and 31% in 2007 are revenue obligation bonds; and approximately 13%
in 2008 and 2007 are general obligation bonds. Insurance on these bonds is provided by AMBAC
Assurance Corporation (61% in 2008 and 64% in 2007), Financial Security Assurance, Inc. (16%
in 2008 and 18% 2007), MBIA Insurance Corporation (17% in 2008 and 11% in 2007), Financial
Guaranty Insurance Co. (5% in 2008 and 6% in 2007) and other (1% in 2008 and 2007). |
Equity Securities
Equity securities totaled $44.9 million at December 31, 2008 and $23.6 million at December 31,
2007. The increase in equity securities in 2008 is primarily due to the reclassification of
non-redeemable perpetual preferred securities with a fair value of $28.0 million, which were
previously classified with fixed maturity securities, and additional acquisitions of these types of
securities during 2008. Gross unrealized gains totaled $4.2 million and gross unrealized losses
totaled $11.3 million at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2007, gross unrealized gains totaled
$1.3 million and gross unrealized losses totaled $0.1 million on these securities. The unrealized
losses in 2008 are primarily attributable to perpetual preferred securities from issuers in the
financial sector. We believe these losses are due to concerns regarding the quality of the assets
the issuers hold and uncertainty regarding when these securities will be called. These securities
are similar to fixed maturities as they provide periodic cash flows, contain call features and are
similarly rated and priced like long-term callable bonds. We have the intent and ability to hold
these investments until a recovery of fair value; therefore we do not consider them to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008. Also included in equity securities is our
investment in AEL which totaled $0.4 million at December 31, 2008 and $12.6 million at December 31,
2007.
Mortgage Loans
Mortgage loans totaled $1,381.9 million at December 31, 2008 and $1,221.6 million at December 31,
2007. Our mortgage loans are diversified as to property type, location and loan size, and are
collateralized by the related properties. The total number of commercial mortgage loans
outstanding was 352 at December 31, 2008 and 335 at December 31, 2007. New loans are generally $5
million to $15 million in size, with an average loan size of $5.5 million and an average loan term
of 12 years. Our mortgage lending policies establish limits on the amount that can be loaned to
one borrower and require diversification by geographic location and collateral type. The majority
of our mortgage loans amortize principal, with 8.2% that are interest only loans at December 31,
2008. At December 31, 2008, the average loan-to-value of the current outstanding principal
balance to the appraised value at origination was 59% and the weighted average debt service
coverage ratio was 1.48.
66
Mortgage Loans by Collateral Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
Collateral Type |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Retail |
|
$ |
467,942 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
$ |
386,506 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
% |
Office |
|
|
466,068 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
426,005 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
418,050 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
373,449 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
29,794 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
35,613 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,221,573 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans by Geographic Location within the United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
Region of the United States |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
South Atlantic |
|
$ |
341,728 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
$ |
284,872 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
% |
East North Central |
|
|
269,876 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
242,899 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
Pacific |
|
|
261,581 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
228,366 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
West North Central |
|
|
172,283 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
158,538 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Mountain |
|
|
132,649 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
127,055 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
West South Central |
|
|
69,582 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
69,739 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
134,155 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
110,104 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,221,573 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans by Loan-to-Value Ratio (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
0% - 50% |
|
$ |
330,144 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
$ |
285,897 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
% |
50% -60% |
|
|
269,816 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
209,444 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
60% - 70% |
|
|
474,436 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
418,941 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
70% - 80% |
|
|
267,159 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
264,245 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
80% - 90% |
|
|
34,904 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
36,463 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
90% - 100% |
|
|
5,395 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
6,583 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Greater than 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,221,573 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio at origination |
Mortgage Loans by Year of Origination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
205,925 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
2007 |
|
|
291,261 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
296,826 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
2006 |
|
|
197,153 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
203,082 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
2005 |
|
|
136,753 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
142,505 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
550,762 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
579,160 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,221,573 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is
probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to contractual terms of the
loan agreement. At December 31, 2008 we had one mortgage loan in the process of foreclosure with a
current outstanding principal balance of $9.4 million
67
and property appraised value of $11.1 million. There were no other mortgage loans in foreclosure
or more than 60 days delinquent at December 31, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments consist primarily of call options supporting our index annuity business net
of collateral received from counterparties totaling $12.9 million at December 31, 2008 and $43.9
million at December 31, 2007. See Market Risks of Financial Instruments for details regarding
how we manage counterparty credit risk.
Collateral
Related to Securities Lending and Other Transactions
We participate in a securities lending program whereby certain fixed maturity securities from our
investment portfolio are loaned to other institutions for a short period of time. We require
collateral equal to or greater than 102% of the fair value of the loaned securities and at least
100% collateral be maintained through the period the securities are on loan. The collateral is
invested by the lending agent, in accordance with our guidelines, generating fee income that is
recognized as net investment income over the period the securities are on loan. The collateral is
accounted for as a secured borrowing and is recorded as an asset on our consolidated balance
sheets, with a corresponding liability reflecting our obligation to return this collateral upon the
return of the loaned securities. Securities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets with a
fair value of $66.4 million at December 31, 2008 and $179.5 million at December 31, 2007 were on
loan under the program, and we were liable for cash collateral under our control totaling $69.6
million at December 31, 2008 and $185.3 million at December 31, 2007. As discussed under
Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investments above, during 2008 we recorded an
other-than-temporary impairment for one security in the collateral fund totaling $1.7 million,
which reduced the collateral held for securities lending. During 2008 we discontinued entering
into any new securities lending agreements and we expect the existing loaned securities to decrease
in 2009 as the underlying collateral matures.
Other
Assets
Deferred policy acquisition costs increased 37.8% to $1,365.6 million and deferred sales
inducements increased 30.8% to $420.1 million at December 31, 2008 primarily due to the impact of
the change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on fixed maturity securities and the
capitalization of costs incurred with new sales, partially offset by amortization and the impact of
the change in net unrealized gains/losses on derivatives. The impact of the change in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation on fixed maturity securities increased deferred policy acquisition costs
$398.2 million and deferred sales inducements $134.2 million during 2008. The impact of the change
in net unrealized gain/losses on derivatives decreased deferred policy acquisition costs $4.3
million and deferred sales inducements $27.4 million during 2008. The change in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation on fixed maturity securities totaling $1,399.2 million also contributed
to the $335.0 million change in deferred income taxes from a liability of $28.2 million at December
31, 2007 to an asset of $306.8 million at December 31, 2008. Other assets increased 28.2% to $41.6
million, primarily due to a $13.7 million increase for receivables for securities sold. Assets
held in separate accounts decreased 33.1% to $577.4 million primarily due to unrealized losses on
the underlying investment portfolios.
Liabilities
Policy liabilities and accruals and other policyholders funds increased 9.5% to $11,933.4 million
at December 31, 2008 primarily due to increases in the volume of business in force. Long-term
debt, including debt with affiliates, increased 17.1% to $371.0 million, primarily due to the
issuance of $100.0 million of 2011 Senior Notes. We also increased the borrowings on our line of
credit agreement and reclassified the total outstanding amount to short-term debt at December 31,
2008, as we intend to repay this debt in the first quarter of 2009,
which will increase our access to liquidity with the Federal Home
Loan Bank. See additional details on these
credit arrangements in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.
68
Stockholders
Equity
Stockholders equity decreased 71.4% to $258.4 million at December 31, 2008, compared to $902.9
million at December 31, 2007. This decrease is primarily attributable to the change in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation on fixed maturity securities, the net loss during 2008 and dividends
paid.
At December 31, 2008, common stockholders equity was $255.4 million, or $8.46 per share, compared
to $899.9 million, or $29.98 per share at December 31, 2007. Included in stockholders equity per
common share is $21.54 at December 31, 2008 and $1.21 at December 31, 2007 attributable to
accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Market Risks of Financial Instruments
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is our primary market risk exposure. Substantial and sustained increases and
decreases in market interest rates can affect the profitability of insurance products and fair
value of investments. The yield realized on new investments generally increases or decreases in
direct relationship with interest rate changes. The fair value of our fixed maturity and mortgage
loan portfolios generally increases when interest rates decrease and decreases when interest rates
increase.
A majority of our insurance liabilities are backed by fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans.
The weighted average life of the fixed maturity and mortgage loan portfolio, based on fair values
and excluding convertible bonds, was approximately 8.9 years at December 31, 2008 and 9.3 years at
December 31, 2007. Accordingly, the earned rate on the portfolio lags behind changes in market
yields. The extent that the portfolio yield lags behind changes in market yields generally depends
upon the following factors:
|
|
The average life of the portfolio. |
|
|
The amount and speed at which market interest rates rise or fall. |
|
|
The amount by which bond calls, mortgage loan prepayments and paydowns on mortgage and
asset-backed securities accelerate during periods of declining interest rates. |
|
|
The amount by which bond calls, mortgage loan prepayments and paydowns on mortgage and
asset-backed securities decelerate during periods of increasing interest rates. |
Our investment earnings are also dependent upon our ability to purchase quality investments. These
opportunities were limited in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the limited liquidity conditions in
the financial markets. In addition, it was our desire to maintain a more liquid position to
provide greater flexibility for managing in these unprecedented economic times.
For a majority of our traditional products, profitability is significantly affected by the spreads
between interest yields on investments and interest crediting rates/call option costs relating to
our insurance liabilities. For variable annuities and variable universal life policies,
profitability on the portion of the policyholders account balance invested in the fixed general
account option, if any, is also affected by the spreads earned. For the variable products, the
policyholder assumes essentially all the investment earnings risk for the portion of the account
balance invested in the separate accounts.
For a substantial portion of our direct business in force, we have the ability to adjust interest
or dividend crediting rates in reaction to changes in portfolio yield. We had the ability to
adjust rates on 97% of our policyholder liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 96% of our
policyholder liabilities at December 31, 2007. However, the ability to adjust these rates is
limited by competitive factors. Surrender rates could increase and new sales could be negatively
impacted if the crediting rates are not competitive with the rates on similar products offered by
other insurance companies and financial services institutions. In addition, if market rates were
to decrease substantially and stay at a low level for an extended period of time, our spread could
be lowered due to interest rate guarantees on many of our interest sensitive products. At December
31, 2008, interest rate guarantees on our direct interest sensitive products ranged from 1.50% to
5.50%, with a weighted average guarantee of 2.19%.
For a substantial portion of business assumed through coinsurance agreements, the ceding companies
have the ability to adjust interest and dividend crediting rates in reaction to portfolio yield.
Most of the traditional annuity and universal life insurance contracts assumed through the
coinsurance agreements have guaranteed minimum
69
crediting rates. These rates range from 2.25% to 4.00%, with a weighted average guaranteed
crediting rate of approximately 3.11% at December 31, 2008.
Interest Crediting Rates of Fixed Rate Individual Deferred Annuities and Interest Sensitive Life Products
Compared to Guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Value at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Direct (1) |
|
|
Assumed Coinsurance |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
At guaranteed rate |
|
$ |
673,740 |
|
|
$ |
109,059 |
|
Between guaranteed rate and 50 basis points over
over guaranteed rate |
|
|
99,375 |
|
|
|
386,952 |
|
Between 50 basis points and 100 basis points over
guaranteed rate |
|
|
979,409 |
|
|
|
109,180 |
|
Greater than 100 basis points over guaranteed rate |
|
|
2,851,207 |
|
|
|
14,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,603,731 |
|
|
$ |
619,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the general account portion of variable contracts. |
For the majority of index annuities, call options are purchased to fund the index credits owed to
contract holders who elect to participate in one or more market indices. Except for certain
contracts for which minimum guaranteed interest rates apply, the options are purchased to fund the
full amount of the annual index credits. For contracts for which minimum guaranteed interest rates
apply, the options are generally purchased to fund the amount of the annual index credits in excess
of minimum guaranteed interest accrued on the contracts. In addition, in 2008, certain contracts
assumed from a coinsurer are not hedged due to the limited availability and high cost of call
options for bond indices in the current market environment. At December 31, 2008 the assumed
account value of unhedged contracts totaled $88.5 million, which represented 8.0% of assumed index
annuities, or 1.8% of our total index annuity business. In 2008, proceeds from the maturity of
call options totaled $36.3 million while related index amounts credited to contract holders
account balances totaled $35.6 million. The difference between index credits and option proceeds
is primarily attributable to call options being purchased for contracts that had a full or partial
surrender during the year, partially offset by the timing of option purchases in volatile market
conditions and proceeds not received from a counterparty that filed for bankruptcy in 2008.
Profitability on the portion of the index annuities tied to market indices is significantly
impacted by the spread on interest earned on investments and the sum of (1) cost of underlying call
options purchased to fund the credits owed to contract holders and (2) minimum interest guarantees
owed to the contract holder, if any. The cost of the call options is managed through the terms of
the index annuities, which permit adjustments to annual participation rates, asset fees, and/or
caps, subject to guaranteed minimums. Extremely volatile market conditions, such as those
experienced in 2008, generally cause the cost of options to increase. The minimum guaranteed
contract values for the majority of annuities marketed by our EquiTrust Life distribution channel
are equal to 87.5% of the premium collected plus interest credited at a range of 1.00% to 3.00%.
In addition, five products with an account value totaling $1,125.3 million at December 31, 2008
offer a minimum guarantee of 100% of premium collected accumulated at a range of 1.50% to 3.00%.
Premium bonuses paid are not guaranteed. The minimum guaranteed contract values for index
annuities assumed are equal to 80% to 100% of the premium collected plus interest credited at rates
ranging between 2.25% to 3.50%. If there were little or no gains in the entire series of options
purchased over the expected life of an index annuity (typically 15 to 20 years), we would incur
expenses for credited interest over and above our option costs. This can cause our spreads to
decrease and reduce our profits.
Profitability on the index annuities in any given year is also impacted by changes in the fair
value of the embedded option which provides the contract holder the right to participate in market
index returns after the next index reset date of the contract. This impacts profitability because
only one or two-year call options are purchased to fund the index credits owed to the contract
holders at the inception of each reset period. This practice matches well with the contract
holders rights to switch to different indices on each reset date. The value of the forward
starting options embedded in the index annuities can fluctuate with changes in assumptions as to
the expected cost of the options, which is driven by expectations as to the future volatility of
the market indices, risk free interest rates, market returns, contractual features such as
participation rates, asset fees, and/or caps and the lives of the contracts.
70
We design our products and manage our investment portfolio in a manner to encourage persistency and
to help ensure targeted spreads are earned. In addition to the ability to change interest
crediting rates on our direct products, certain interest sensitive and index contracts have
surrender and withdrawal penalty provisions. Products such as supplementary contracts with life
contingencies are not subject to surrender or discretionary withdrawal. Other products such as
index and fixed rate annuities may be subject to surrender charges. Depending on the product and
length of time the contract has been in force, surrender charge rates range up to 20.0% and
surrender charge periods range up to 14 years. Depending on the contract, the surrender charge
rate typically decreases 1.0% for every one-to-two years the contract is in force.
Surrender and Discretionary Withdrawal Characteristics of Interest Sensitive and Index Products and
Supplementary Contracts Without Life Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Direct |
|
|
Assumed Coinsurance |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Surrender charge rate before any market value
adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to 5% |
|
$ |
6,390,736 |
|
|
$ |
1,353,184 |
|
Less than 5%, but still subject to surrender charge |
|
|
769,137 |
|
|
|
213,075 |
|
Not subject to surrender charge |
|
|
1,781,166 |
|
|
|
282,665 |
|
Not subject to surrender or discretionary withdrawal |
|
|
241,909 |
|
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,182,948 |
|
|
$ |
1,853,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuities sold directly through our independent distribution channel with reserves totaling
$6,044.3 million at December 31, 2008 have a market value adjustment (MVA) feature that may
increase or decrease the amount of the charge applied to a surrender or withdrawal. The MVA is
determined by a mathematical formula which uses changes in U.S. Treasury interest rates since the
inception of the contract. The MVA provides us interest rate protection through an increased
surrender charge when U.S. Treasury interest rates rise. Conversely, the MVA provides a benefit to
the contract holder through a reduced surrender charge when U.S. Treasury interest rates decrease.
We sell contracts with an MVA feature to mitigate interest rate risk. As stated above, the value
of our fixed maturity securities decreases when interest rates increase. We want increased
surrender charge protection in a rising interest rate environment as the fixed maturity securities
backing the contracts sold would likely be in an unrealized loss position. Conversely, while we
always want our business to persist, in a decreasing interest rate environment we do not need as
much surrender charge protection as the fixed maturity securities backing the contracts would
likely be in an unrealized gain position. If needed, the securities backing the contracts
surrendered could be sold at a gain to offset the loss of surrender charge income due to an MVA.
In order to achieve the intended risk mitigation the yields earned on fixed maturities securities
need to move directionally and, to a certain extent, proportionally the same as or similar to the
yields earned on U.S. Treasury securities.
Due to a significant decrease in U.S. Treasury rates during the fourth quarter of 2008 and
resulting low rates in effect at December 31, 2008, the surrender charge protection after the MVA
offset on this business decreased significantly. At December 31, 2008, EquiTrust Life direct
annuity contracts with a reserve totaling $4,977.2 million had a gross surrender charge in excess
of 5.0%, but a net surrender charge after the MVA of less than 5.0%. The sensitivity of the net
surrender charge after the MVA to changes in the U.S. Treasury rates is illustrated below.
71
Surrender Charge Sensitivity Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Surrender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Rate (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Charge Rate with MVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuities |
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
Average |
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Reserve |
|
Treasury |
|
U.S. |
|
Treasury |
|
Surrender |
|
Treasury |
|
U.S. |
|
Treasury |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Rate |
|
Treasury |
|
Rate |
|
Rate |
|
Rate |
|
Treasury |
|
Rate |
|
|
2008 |
|
less 0.50% |
|
Rate |
|
plus 0.50% |
|
before MVA |
|
less 0.50% |
|
Rate |
|
plus 0.50% |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Fixed Index
Annuities |
|
$ |
3,677,428 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
Fixed Rate
Annuities |
|
$ |
2,366,859 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A 10-year U.S. Treasury rate is used for the fixed index annuities. A 5-year U.S. Treasury rate
is used for the
fixed rate annuities. These U.S. Treasury rates approximate the interest rate feature of the
respective annuities. |
The sensitivity analysis noted above is performed using interest rates as of January 31, 2009 to
demonstrate the surrender charge protection on this business as of a date close to the filing date
of this Form 10-K and to better illustrate the sensitivity of the MVA offset to decreases in the
U.S. Treasury rate. At December 31, 2008, the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate was at 2.25%. The impact
on the MVA of a 50 basis point decrease in the U.S. Treasury rate at December 31, 2008 would have
been less than the impact of the decrease noted above because of a floor on the MVA. For most
contracts, the MVA offset is floored at an amount equal to the amount of the gross surrender
charge.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, credit spreads widened significantly while the U.S. Treasury
rates decreased. As a result, we experienced an increase in surrender activity while the value of
our fixed maturity securities declined. Surrender and withdrawals benefits for our EquiTrust Life
direct index and fixed rate annuity contracts during 2008 totaled $79.4 million in first quarter,
$94.2 million in second quarter, $118.6 million in third quarter and $187.1 million in the fourth
quarter. During 2008, we received gross surrender charges on this direct business totaling $37.5
million, which were reduced by MVAs totaling $15.5 million. The unanticipated increase in
requested surrenders, which began in late 2008 and averaged $13.3 million per business day during
January 2009, required us to update assumptions in the models used to calculate amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements, which resulted in a $29.6 million
increase to amortization in 2008.
We have initiated conservation efforts to reduce the surrender activity for existing contracts and
are evaluating the terms and conditions for future products. In addition, the surrender charge
protection has increased since year end with the increase in U.S. Treasury rates from the historic
lows experienced at the end of 2008. However, the increase in surrenders, combined with the
reduction in sales to preserve capital, may cause EquiTrust Life to have net negative cash outflows
in 2009. We anticipate using cash on hand and to the extent necessary, proceeds from investment
sales of fixed maturity securities in an unrealized gain position to meet these needs. At December
31, 2008, EquiTrust Life had cash and short-term investments on hand totaling $99.8 million and
fixed maturity securities in an unrealized gain position totaling $1,430.4 million. In addition,
in 2009 EquiTrust Life became a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank, which provides a source for
securitized borrowings if needed.
As of December 31, 2008, we have entered into two interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk
associated with a portion of our flexible premium deferred annuity contracts. Under the interest
rate swaps, we pay a fixed rate of interest and receive a floating rate of interest on a notional
amount totaling $100.0 million. These interest rate swaps effectively fix the interest crediting
rate on a portion of our flexible premium deferred annuity contract liabilities thereby hedging our
exposure to increases in market interest rates. We also have one interest rate swap to hedge the
variable component of the interest rate on a portion of our line of credit borrowings. The terms
of this swap provide that we pay a fixed rate of interest and receive a floating rate of interest
on a notional amount of $46.0 million. Any gain or loss on the interest rate swap settlements
offset any increase or decrease in the interest paid, effectively fixing our interest expense
related to that portion of our line of credit. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements
for additional discussion of these interest rate swaps.
A major component of our asset-liability management program is structuring the investment portfolio
with cash flow characteristics consistent with the cash flow characteristics of our insurance
liabilities. We use models to perform
72
simulations of the cash flows generated from existing insurance policies under various interest
rate scenarios. Information from these models is used in the determination of investment
strategies. Effective duration is a common measure for price sensitivity to changes in interest
rates. It measures the approximate percentage change in the fair value of a portfolio when
interest rates change by 100 basis points. This measure includes the impact of estimated changes
in portfolio cash flows from features such as bond calls and prepayments. When the estimated
durations of assets and liabilities are similar, exposure to interest rate risk is reduced because
a change in the value of assets should be largely offset by a change in the value of liabilities.
Our exposure to interest rate risk stems largely from our annuity products as the cash flows of
these products can vary significantly with changes in interest rates. We have holdings in fixed
maturity and mortgage loan portfolios to offset the interest rate risk of our annuity products. We
actively manage the duration of these assets and liabilities by minimizing the difference between
the two. The effective duration of the fixed maturity and mortgage loan portfolios backing our
annuity products was 6.7 at December 31, 2008 and 6.5 at December 31, 2007. The effective duration
of our annuity liabilities was approximately 7.5 at December 31, 2008 and 6.7 at December 31, 2007.
If interest rates were to increase 10% from levels at December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of
our fixed maturity securities and short-term investments would decrease approximately $127.5
million at December 31, 2008 and $254.2 million at December 31, 2007, and the value of our interest
rate swaps would increase approximately $0.3 million at December 31, 2008 and $4.9 million at
December 31, 2007. These hypothetical changes in value do not take into account any offsetting
change in the value of insurance liabilities for investment contracts since we estimate such value
to be the cash surrender value for a majority of the underlying contracts. If interest rates were
to decrease 10% from levels at December 31, 2008 and 2007 the fair value of our debt would increase
$1.8 million at December 31, 2008 and $6.5 million at December 31, 2007, while the value of the
interest rate swap on our line of credit would decrease $0.1 million at December 31, 2008 and $0.5
million at December 31, 2007.
The models used to estimate the impact of a 10% change in market interest rates use many
assumptions and estimates that materially impact the fair value calculations. Key assumptions used
by the models include an immediate and parallel shift in the yield curve and an acceleration of
bond calls and principal prepayments on mortgage and other asset-backed securities. The above
estimates do not attempt to measure the financial statement impact on the resulting change in
deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, value of insurance in force
acquired, unearned revenue reserves and income taxes. Due to the subjectivity of these
assumptions, the actual impact of a 10% change in rates on the fair values would likely be
different from that estimated.
Equity Risk
Equity price risk is limited due to the relatively small equity portfolio held at December 31,
2008. However, we do earn investment management fees (on those investments managed by us) and
mortality and expense fee income based on the value of our separate accounts. On an annualized
basis, the investment management fee rates range from 0.20% to 0.45% for 2008, 2007 and 2006. The
annual mortality and expense fee rates range from 0.00% to 1.44% for 2008 and 0.90% to 1.40% for
2007 and 2006. As a result, revenues from these sources do fluctuate with changes in the fair
value of the equity, fixed maturity and other securities held by the separate accounts. In
addition, we have equity price risk to the extent we may owe amounts under the guaranteed minimum
death benefit and guaranteed minimum income benefit provisions of our variable annuity contracts.
See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of these provisions.
Furthermore, as discussed above, our profitability would be impacted if there were little or no
gains in the entire series of options purchased over the expected life of an index annuity
contract.
Credit Risk
We have exposure to credit risk as it relates to the uncertainty associated with the continued
ability of a given obligator to make timely payments of principal and interest. See Financial
Condition Investments for additional information about credit risk in our investment portfolio.
Counterparty Risk
In connection with our use of interest rate swaps and call options, we are exposed to counterparty
credit risk (the risk that a counterparty fails to perform under the terms of the derivative
contract). While we do not anticipate nonperformance by any of our counterparties, we did
experience nonperformance on an interest rate swap agreement with one counterparty that filed for
bankruptcy protection in 2008. We terminated the agreement and realized a loss
73
totaling $0.5 million. The default of this counterparty also caused us to realize a $2.9 million
loss relating to call options assumed through a coinsurance agreement. In addition, it is likely
we will not receive proceeds when the call options purchased from this counterparty expire in 2009,
however we will be required to fund index credits owed to contract holders for appreciation in the
underlying market indices based on the contract terms.
Our policy is to purchase derivative instruments from multiple counterparties and evaluate the
creditworthiness of all counterparties prior to purchase of the contracts. We believe that
purchasing such agreements from financial institutions with superior performance reduces the credit
risk associated with these agreements. Our policy allows us to purchase derivative instruments
from nationally recognized investment banking institutions with an S&P rating of BBB+ or higher.
As of December 31, 2008, all derivative instruments have been purchased from counterparties with an
S&P rating of A or higher. Collateral support documents are negotiated to further reduce the
exposure when deemed necessary. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for details
regarding collateral we held as of December 31, 2008. Counterparty credit ratings and credit
exposure are monitored monthly and reviewed quarterly by our credit and investment committees. Our
credit exposure is the fair value of derivative instruments with a positive value, which totaled
$12.9 million at December 31, 2008, net of collateral held.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
During 2008, our operating activities generated cash flows totaling $404.1 million. This is
primarily due to net income (loss) of ($18.1) million adjusted for non-cash revenues and expenses
netting to $422.2 million. We used cash of $1,525.0 million in our investing activities during
2008. The primary uses were related to $2,312.6 million of investment acquisitions, partially
offset by $777.9 million of sales, maturities or the repayment of investments. Our financing
activities provided cash of $1,074.6 million during 2008. The primary sources were
$2,162.4 million for receipts from interest sensitive and index products credited to policyholder
account balances and $113.4 million in proceeds from additional debt borrowings, partially offset
by $1,187.4 million for return of policyholder account balances on interest sensitive and index
products.
Sources and Uses of Capital Resources
Parent company cash inflows from operations consists primarily of (i) dividends from subsidiaries,
if declared and paid, (ii) fees that it charges the various subsidiaries and affiliates for
management of their operations, (iii) expense reimbursements from subsidiaries and affiliates, (iv)
proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options, (v) proceeds from borrowings (vi) tax
settlements between the parent company and its subsidiaries and (vii) investment income. Revenue
sources for the parent company during 2008 included management fees from subsidiaries and
affiliates of $10.1 million and investment income of $1.7 million. Cash outflows are principally
for salaries, taxes and other expenses related to providing these management services, dividends on
outstanding stock, interest and principal repayments on our parent company debt and capital
contributions to subsidiaries.
The Life Companies cash inflows consist primarily of premium income, deposits to policyholder
account balances, income from investments, sales, maturities and calls of investments, repayments
of investment principal and proceeds from call option exercises. In addition, EquiTrust Life has
received capital contributions from FBL Financial Group, Inc. to help fund its growth or replenish
capital. The Life Companies cash outflows are primarily related to withdrawals of policyholder
account balances, investment purchases, payment of policy acquisition costs, policyholder benefits,
income taxes, dividends and current operating expenses. Life insurance companies generally produce
a positive cash flow which may be measured by the degree to which cash inflows are adequate to meet
benefit obligations to policyholders and normal operating expenses as they are incurred. The
remaining cash flow is generally used to increase the asset base to provide funds to meet the need
for future policy benefit payments and for writing new business. The Life Companies continuing
operations and financing activities relating to interest sensitive and index products provided
funds totaling $1,370.5 million in 2008, $1,418.4 million in 2007 and $1,599.1 million in 2006.
In November 2008, the parent company issued 9.25% notes payable to affiliates totaling $100.0
million (2011 Senior Notes) that mature in November 2011. One note for $75.0 million was issued to
Farm Bureau Mutual and a $25.0 million note was issued to an investment affiliate of Iowa Farm
Bureau Federation, our majority shareholder. During 2008, the parent company also borrowed the
remaining $14.0 million on a bank line of credit, which is due in October 2010. A portion of these
proceeds was used for a $55.0 million capital contribution to EquiTrust Life and to repay a $20.0
million short-term note that was issued to Farm Bureau Mutual during 2008. This capital
74
contribution was needed to fund EquiTrust Lifes significant growth and to replenish capital used
as a result of write-downs of securities for other-than-temporary impairments during the year. In
the second half of 2008, we took rate and other actions to slow sales from EquiTrust Life in order
to preserve capital. The remaining debt proceeds are being held at the parent company to be used
as needs dictate. Additional details regarding these borrowings are summarized in Note 7, Credit
Arrangements, to our consolidated financial statements.
During 2009, we expect Farm Bureau Life to generate sufficient cash flows from premiums and
deposits to meet cash outflow requirements. At EquiTrust Life, an increase in surrenders due to
market value adjustments on certain products, combined with the reduction in sales to preserve
capital, may cause cash outflows in 2009 to exceed cash inflows. Any net cash outflow is expected
to be funded by cash on hand and sales of investments or additional borrowings, to the extent
necessary. See the Market Risks of Financial Instruments section above for additional discussion
on the impact of market value adjustments on surrender activity and liquidity.
We paid cash dividends on our common and preferred stock totaling $15.1 million in 2008, $14.4
million in 2007 and $13.7 million in 2006. Interest payments on our debt totaled $18.8 million in
2008, $15.1 million in 2007 and $11.7 million in 2006. It is anticipated that quarterly cash
dividend requirements for 2009 will be $0.0075 per Series B redeemable preferred share and up to
$0.125 per common share. The level of common stock dividends will be analyzed quarterly and will
be dependent upon our capital and liquidity positions. Assuming a common dividend rate of $0.125
per common share, the common and preferred dividends would total approximately $15.1 million during
2009. In addition, interest payments on our debt outstanding at December 31, 2008 are estimated to
be $25.1 million for 2009.
The ability of the Life Companies to pay dividends to FBL Financial Group, Inc. is limited by law
to earned profits (statutory unassigned surplus) as of the date the dividend is paid, as determined
in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by insurance regulatory authorities of the State
of Iowa. During 2009, the maximum amount legally available for distribution to FBL Financial
Group, Inc., without further regulatory approval, from Farm Bureau Life is $38.2 million.
EquiTrust Life cannot pay a dividend without regulatory approval in 2009 due to its unassigned
surplus position at December 31, 2008. See Note 13 of our consolidated financial statements for
additional details on the dividend limitation.
In addition, we manage the amount of our capital to be consistent with an A ratings objective from
Standard & Poors and A.M. Best. As of December 31, 2008, we estimate that we have sufficient
capital in the life insurance subsidiaries, combined with capital at the holding company, to meet
this rating objective. However, this capital may not be sufficient if significant future losses
are incurred and, given the current market conditions, access to additional capital could be
limited.
FBL Financial Group, Inc. expects to rely on available cash resources and dividends from Farm
Bureau Life to make dividend payments to its stockholders and interest payments on its debt. The
parent company had available cash and investments totaling $83.5 million at December 31, 2008. As
discussed under Liabilities above, we anticipate using a portion of these liquid assets to pay off our $60.0 million line
of credit borrowings in the first quarter of 2009. During 2008, Farm Bureau Life paid dividends
totaling $20.0 million to the parent company. We anticipate that Farm Bureau Life will pay
dividends totaling $15.0 million in 2009. As of December 31, 2008, we had no material commitments
for capital expenditures.
On a consolidated basis, we anticipate that funds to meet our short-term and long-term capital
expenditures, cash dividends to stockholders, operating cash needs and the repayment of our
short-term debt will come from existing capital and internally generated funds. We believe that
current levels of cash, available-for-sale and short-term securities, combined with expected net
cash inflows from operations, maturities of fixed maturity investments, principal payments on
mortgage and asset-backed securities and mortgage loans and premiums and deposits on our insurance
products, will be adequate to meet our anticipated cash obligations for the foreseeable future.
However, there can be no assurance that future experience regarding benefits and surrenders will be
similar to historic
75
experience since benefits and surrender levels are influenced by such factors as the interest rate
environment, our financial strength ratings, the economy and other factors that impact policyholder
behavior. Our investment portfolio at December 31, 2008, included $262.5 million of short-term
investments, $37.7 million of cash and $1,232.6 million in carrying value of U.S. Government and
U.S. Government agency backed securities that could be readily converted to cash at or near
carrying value.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2008 or 2007.
Contractual Obligations
In the normal course of business, we enter into insurance contracts, financing transactions, lease
agreements or other commitments which are necessary or beneficial to our operations. These
commitments may obligate us to certain cash flows during future periods. The following table
summarizes such obligations as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1 3 |
|
|
4 5 |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Contractual Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance liabilities (1) |
|
$ |
21,983,253 |
|
|
$ |
1,998,156 |
|
|
$ |
2,490,673 |
|
|
$ |
2,882,955 |
|
|
$ |
14,611,469 |
|
Subordinated note payable to
Capital Trust, including
interest payments (2) |
|
|
283,725 |
|
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
|
9,700 |
|
|
|
9,700 |
|
|
|
259,475 |
|
Revolving line of credit,
including interest payments
(3) |
|
|
61,039 |
|
|
|
61,039 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
2017 Senior Notes, including
interest payments |
|
|
149,938 |
|
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
11,750 |
|
|
|
11,750 |
|
|
|
120,563 |
|
2014 Senior Notes, including
interest payments |
|
|
99,132 |
|
|
|
4,388 |
|
|
|
8,775 |
|
|
|
8,775 |
|
|
|
77,194 |
|
2011 Senior Notes, including
interest payments |
|
|
126,337 |
|
|
|
9,250 |
|
|
|
117,087 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Collateral payable for
securities lending and other
transactions |
|
|
69,656 |
|
|
|
69,656 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Home office operating leases |
|
|
11,353 |
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
5,343 |
|
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other long-term liabilities (4) |
|
|
32,444 |
|
|
|
12,583 |
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
|
5,556 |
|
|
|
8,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,819,446 |
|
|
$ |
2,169,543 |
|
|
$ |
2,649,951 |
|
|
$ |
2,922,507 |
|
|
$ |
15,077,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts shown in this table are projected payments through the year 2057 which we are
contractually obligated to pay to our life insurance and annuity contract holders. The
payments are derived from actuarial models which assume a level interest rate scenario and
incorporate assumptions regarding mortality and persistency when applicable. These
assumptions are based on our historical experience. The total of the contractual obligations
relating to insurance contracts noted above differs from the liability balance on our
consolidated balance sheet as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
(a) Reserves based on account values, including separate
accounts |
|
$ |
16,473,292 |
|
|
$ |
10,971,099 |
|
|
$ |
5,502,193 |
|
(c) Supplementary contracts involving life contingencies |
|
|
469,775 |
|
|
|
138,287 |
|
|
|
331,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,943,067 |
|
|
|
11,109,386 |
|
|
|
5,833,681 |
|
(b) Traditional life insurance and accident and health products |
|
|
4,115,344 |
|
|
|
1,328,506 |
|
|
|
2,786,838 |
|
(c) Supplementary contracts without life contingencies |
|
|
601,828 |
|
|
|
504,885 |
|
|
|
96,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,660,239 |
|
|
$ |
12,942,777 |
|
|
$ |
8,717,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
The more significant factors causing this difference include:
|
(a) |
|
reserves for products such as annuities and universal life products are generally based
on the account values of the contracts without taking into account surrender charges, while
the contractual obligations table includes projected cash payments. The following are the
reconciling items between these balances (dollars in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves based on account values, including separate accounts, per table above |
|
$ |
10,971,099 |
|
Projected amounts pertaining to: |
|
|
|
|
Accumulation of interest/index credits |
|
|
5,022,605 |
|
Surrender charges |
|
|
(102,427 |
) |
Death benefits on universal life business in excess of projected account values |
|
|
1,130,966 |
|
Net cost of insurance charges on variable and universal life business |
|
|
(632,605 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
83,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual obligations per table above |
|
$ |
16,473,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
traditional life reserves are computed as the present value of future benefits less the
present value of future premiums while the contractual obligations table includes gross
benefit payments and |
|
|
(c) |
|
reserves for supplementary contracts and similar instruments are computed as the
present value of future cash payments while the table above includes cash payments without
the impact of discounting. |
|
In addition, contractual obligations totaling $323.0 million relating to dividend accumulations
and other policy claims are included in the Other policy claims and benefits and Advance
premiums and other deposits lines on our consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
Amount shown is net of $3.0 million equity investment in the Capital Trust due to the
contractual right of setoff upon repayment of the note. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest on the revolving line of credit is estimated at 3.73%. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes our estimated future contributions to multiemployer defined benefit plans.
Contributions related to the qualified pension plan are included through 2009. No amounts
related to the qualified pension plan are included beyond 2009 as the contribution amounts
will be re-evaluated based on actual results. |
We are also a party to other operating leases with total payments of approximately $0.2 million per
year. Generally, these leases are renewable annually with similar terms. Although our current
intention is to renew these leases, we are not obligated to do so.
Effects of Inflation
Inflation has not had a material effect on our consolidated results of operations.
Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates
The following is a brief summary of our significant accounting policies and a review of our most
critical accounting estimates. For a complete description of our significant accounting polices,
see Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.
In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), premiums and
considerations received for interest sensitive and index products, such as ordinary annuities and
universal life insurance, are reflected as increases in liabilities for policyholder account
balances and not as revenues. Revenues reported for these products consist of policy charges for
the cost of insurance, administration charges, amortization of policy initiation fees and surrender
charges assessed against policyholder account balances. Surrender benefits paid relating to these
products are reflected as decreases in liabilities for policyholder account balances and not as
expenses. The Life Companies receive investment income earned from the funds deposited into
account balances, a portion of which is passed through to the policyholders in the form of interest
credited. For index annuities, proceeds from call options are earned from a portion of the funds
deposited, which are passed through to the contract holders in the form of index credits. Index
credits and interest credited to policyholder account balances and benefit claims in excess of
policyholder account balances are reported as expenses in our consolidated financial statements.
77
Premium revenues reported for traditional life insurance products are recognized as revenues when
due. Future policy benefits are recognized as expenses over the life of the policy by means of the
provision for future policy benefits.
For variable universal life and variable annuities, premiums received are not reported as revenues.
Similar to universal life and ordinary annuities, revenues reported consist of fee income and
product charges collected from the policyholders. Expenses related to these products include
benefit claims incurred in excess of policyholder account balances.
The costs related to acquiring new business, including certain costs of issuing policies and other
variable selling expenses (principally commissions), defined as deferred policy acquisition costs
and deferred sales inducements, are capitalized and amortized into expense. We also record an
asset, value of insurance in force acquired, for the cost assigned to insurance contracts when an
insurance company is acquired. For nonparticipating traditional life products, these costs are
amortized over the premium paying period of the related policies, in proportion to the ratio of
annual premium revenues to total anticipated premium revenues. Such anticipated premium revenues
are estimated using the same assumptions used for computing liabilities for future policy benefits
and are generally locked in at the date the policies are issued. For participating traditional
life insurance, interest sensitive and index products, these costs are amortized generally in
proportion to expected gross profits from surrender charges and investment, mortality and expense
margins. This amortization is adjusted (also known as unlocked) when the Life Companies revise
their estimate of current or future gross profits or margins. For example, deferred policy
acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements are amortized earlier than originally estimated
when policy terminations are higher than originally estimated or when investments backing the
related policyholder liabilities are sold at a gain prior to their anticipated maturity.
Death and other policyholder benefits reflect exposure to mortality risk and fluctuate from year to
year based on the level of claims incurred under insurance retention limits.
We test our goodwill balances by comparing the fair value of our reporting units to the carrying
value of the goodwill. We have performed impairment testing using cash flow and other analyses and
determined that of our goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
Pension assets and liabilities are affected by the estimated market value of plan assets, estimates
of the expected return on plan assets and/or discount rates. Actual changes in the fair market
value of plan assets and differences between the actual return on plan assets and the expected
return on plan assets will affect the amount of pension expense ultimately recognized. The
December 31, 2008 pension obligation was computed based on an average 5.93% discount rate, which
was based on yields for high-quality corporate bonds with a maturity approximating the duration of
our pension liability. The long-term return on plan assets is determined based on current market
values of our pension investments. Declines in comparable bond yields would increase our net
pension liability. Our net pension liability could increase or decrease depending on the extent to
which returns on pension plan assets are lower or higher than the discount rate.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. It is reasonably possible that
actual experience could differ from the estimates and assumptions utilized which could have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements. A summary of our significant accounting
estimates and the hypothetical effects of changes in the material assumptions used to develop each
estimate, are included in the following table. We have discussed the identification, selection and
disclosure of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors.
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Description of |
|
|
Assumptions / |
|
|
Effect if Different |
|
|
Caption |
|
|
Critical Estimate |
|
|
Approach Used |
|
|
Assumptions / Approach Used |
|
|
Fixed maturities
available for sale
|
|
|
Excluding U.S.
government treasury
securities, very few
of our fixed maturity
securities trade on
the balance sheet
date. For those
securities without a
trade on the balance
sheet date, fair
values are determined
using valuation
processes that require
judgment.
|
|
|
Fair values are
obtained primarily
from a variety of
independent pricing
sources, whose
results undergo
evaluation by our
internal investment
professionals.
Details regarding
valuation
techniques and
processes are
summarized in Note
1, Significant
Accounting Policies
Investments
Fair Values, and
Note 4, Fair
Values of Financial
Instruments, to
our consolidated
financial
statements.
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, our
fixed maturity securities
classified as available
for sale had a fair value
of $8,965.4 million, with
gross unrealized gains
totaling $110.2 million
and gross unrealized
losses totaling $1,649.8
million. Due to the large
number of fixed maturity
securities held, the
unique attributes of each
security and the
complexity of valuation
methods, it is not
practical to estimate a
potential range of fair
values for different
assumptions and methods
that could be used in the
valuation process. |
|
|
Fixed maturities
available for sale
and equity
securities
|
|
|
We are required to
exercise judgment to
determine when a
decline in the value
of a security is other
than temporary. When
the value of a
security declines and
the decline is
determined to be other
than temporary, the
carrying value of the
investment is reduced
to its fair value and
a realized loss is
recorded to the extent
of the decline.
|
|
|
We evaluate the
operating results
of the underlying
issuer, near-term
prospects of the
issuer, general
market conditions,
causes for the
decline in value,
the length of time
there has been a
decline in value,
other key economic
measures and our
intent and ability
to hold a security
to recovery of fair
value.
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, we
had 1,458 fixed maturity
and equity securities with
gross unrealized losses
totaling $1,661.1 million.
Included in the gross
unrealized losses are
losses attributable to
both movements in market
interest rates as well as
temporary credit issues.
Details regarding these
securities are included in
the Financial Condition
Investments section that
follows. Net income
(loss) would have been
reduced by approximately
$1,012.1 million if all
these securities were
deemed to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired on December 31,
2008. |
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Description of |
|
|
Assumptions / |
|
|
Effect if Different |
|
|
Caption |
|
|
Critical Estimate |
|
|
Approach Used |
|
|
Assumptions / Approach Used |
|
|
Deferred policy
acquisition costs
and deferred sales
inducements
|
|
|
Amortization of
deferred policy
acquisition costs and
deferred sales
inducements for
participating life
insurance and interest
sensitive and index
products is dependent
upon estimates of
future gross profits
or margins on this
business. Key
assumptions used
include the following:
amount of
death and surrender
benefits and the
length of time the
policies will stay in
force,
yield on
investments supporting
the liabilities,
amount of
interest or dividends
credited to the
policies,
amount of
policy fees and
charges, and
amount of
expenses necessary to
maintain the policies.
|
|
|
These estimates,
which are revised
at least annually,
are based on
historical results
and our best
estimate of future
experience.
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs
and deferred sales
inducements for
participating life
insurance and interest
sensitive and index
products totaled
approximately $150.9
million for 2009,
excluding the impact of
new production in 2009. A
10% increase in estimated
gross profits for 2009
would result in $10.0
million of additional
amortization expense.
Correspondingly, a 10%
decrease in estimated
gross profits would result
in a $10.2 million
reduction of amortization
expense. |
|
|
Future policy
benefits
|
|
|
Reserving for future
policy benefits for
traditional life
insurance products
requires the use of
many assumptions,
including the duration
of the policies,
mortality experience,
lapse rates, surrender
rates and dividend
crediting rates.
The development of
reserves for future
policy benefits for
index annuities
requires the valuation
of the embedded
derivatives relating
to the contract
holders right to
participate in one or
more market indices.
This valuation
requires assumptions
as to future option
costs that are
dependent upon the
volatility of the
market indices, risk
free interest rates,
market returns and the
expected lives of the
contracts.
|
|
|
These assumptions
are made based upon
historical
experience,
industry standards
and a best estimate
of future results
and, for
traditional life
products, include a
provision for
adverse deviation.
For traditional
life insurance,
once established
for a particular
series of products,
these assumptions
are generally held
constant. For
index annuities,
these assumptions
are revised at each
balance sheet date.
|
|
|
Due to the number of
independent variables
inherent in the
calculation of traditional
life insurance reserves
and reserves for the
embedded derivatives in
index annuities, it is not
practical to perform a
sensitivity analysis on
the impact of reasonable
changes in the underlying
assumptions. The cost of
performing detailed
calculations using
different assumption
scenarios outweighs the
benefit that would be
derived. We believe our
assumptions are realistic
and produce reserves that
are fairly stated in
accordance with GAAP. |
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Description of |
|
|
Assumptions / |
|
|
Effect if Different |
|
|
Caption |
|
|
Critical Estimate |
|
|
Approach Used |
|
|
Assumptions / Approach Used |
|
|
Other
assets/liabilities
|
|
|
The determination of
net periodic pension
expense and related
accrued/prepaid
pension cost requires
the use of estimates
as to the expected
return on plan assets,
discount rate on plan
liabilities and other
actuarial assumptions.
Pension expense for
2008 totaled $5.4
million.
|
|
|
We assume an
expected long-term
rate of return on
plan assets of
7.00% and discount
rate of 6.01%.
Details regarding
the method used to
determine the
discount rate are
summarized in Note
9, Retirement and
Compensation
Plans, to our
consolidated
financial
statements.
|
|
|
A 100 basis point decrease
in the expected return on
assets would result in a
$1.0 million increase in
pension expense and a 100
basis point increase would
result in a $1.0 million
decrease to pension
expense. A 100 basis
point decrease in the
assumed discount rate
would result in a $0.2
million increase in
pension expense while a
100 basis point increase
would result in a $0.1
million decrease to
pension expense. |
|
|
Accounting Changes Adopted
Effective September 30, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Staff Position
(FSP) No. FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That
Asset Is Not Active. This FSP clarifies the application of Statement No. 157 in a market that is
not active and applies to financial assets within the scope of accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements in accordance with Statement No. 157. The impact of this
adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the required disclosures
about fair value measurements. The impact of adoption was to decrease the carrying value of
certain investments and certain policy liabilities and accruals in our consolidated financial
statements, resulting in an increase to net income of $5.6 million ($0.19 per basic and diluted
common share). The primary impact of this change was a decrease to the embedded derivatives in the
index annuity reserves of $26.7 million. The impact of this change on net income was mitigated by
offsets for the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements
and income taxes.
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted the measurement date portion of Statement No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). This portion of Statement No. 158 requires
measurement of a plans assets and benefit obligations as of the end of the employers fiscal year.
We adopted the measurement date portion of this Statement, using the single measurement date
method, which resulted in a decrease to retained earnings totaling $0.8 million.
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted FSP FIN 39-1, which amends certain aspects of FASB
Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts an interpretation of
APB Opinion No. 10 and FASB Statement No. 105. This FSP allows a reporting entity to offset fair
value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation
to return cash collateral (a payable) against fair value amounts recognized for derivative
instruments executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement. Cash
collateral payable totaling $10.9 million at December 31, 2008 and $70.9 at December 31, 2007 is
netted against the fair value of the call options included in derivative instruments. Cash
collateral receivable totaling $9.7 million at December 31, 2008 and $4.3 million at December 31,
2007 is netted with interest rate swaps included in other liabilities in our consolidated balance
sheets. This FSP has no impact on our consolidated statements of operations.
Pending Accounting Changes
As described in more detail in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements, we will be subject
to certain pending accounting changes. During 2009, we plan to adopt the following:
Statement No. 160, Accounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling Interest in consolidated financial
statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51, which was issued by the FASB in December 2007. This
Statement establishes
81
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling (minority) interest in a subsidiary,
which requires that the minority interest be reported in equity, and the related net income (loss)
and comprehensive income be included in the respective lines of our consolidated financial
statements. This Statement is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. The impact of this adoption on our
consolidated financial statements is expected to be immaterial and will primarily result in a
reclassification of minority interest as noted above.
In November 2008, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 08-6, Equity Method
Investment Accounting Considerations. EITF No. 08-6 establishes accounting and reporting
standards for valuing equity method investees and their equity transactions. EITF No. 08-6 will be
effective in the first quarter of 2009 and early adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the
adoption of EITF No. 08-6 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Market Risks of Financial Instruments, for our quantitative and qualitative
disclosures about market risk.
82
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f). Under the
supervision and the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our
evaluation under the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework, our management concluded
that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.
We engage Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to audit our financial statements and internal
control over financial reporting and express their opinion thereon. A copy of Ernst & Young LLPs
audit opinions follows this letter.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
We have audited FBL Financial Group, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). FBL
Financial Group, Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become
83
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, FBL Financial Group, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 of FBL Financial Group, Inc. and our report dated
February 18, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
February 18, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FBL Financial Group, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of FBL Financial Group, Inc. at December 31,
2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2007 the Company changed its
methods of accounting for the treatment of modifications or exchanges of insurance contracts,
income tax contingencies and cash flow hedges on certain fixed annuity contracts.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), FBL Financial Group, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
February 18, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
February 18, 2009
84
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale, at market
(amortized cost: 2008 - $10,505,084; 2007 - $9,662,986) |
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
$ |
9,522,592 |
|
Equity securities available for sale, at market (cost:
2008 - $51,958; 2007 - $22,410) |
|
|
44,863 |
|
|
|
23,633 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
1,221,573 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
43,918 |
|
Investment real estate |
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
Policy loans |
|
|
182,421 |
|
|
|
179,490 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
262,459 |
|
|
|
72,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
10,854,059 |
|
|
|
11,067,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
37,710 |
|
|
|
84,015 |
|
Securities and indebtedness of related parties |
|
|
18,921 |
|
|
|
19,957 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
136,893 |
|
|
|
118,827 |
|
Amounts receivable from affiliates |
|
|
15,791 |
|
|
|
10,831 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
107,854 |
|
|
|
123,659 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
1,365,609 |
|
|
|
991,155 |
|
Deferred sales inducements |
|
|
420,147 |
|
|
|
321,263 |
|
Value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
63,121 |
|
|
|
41,215 |
|
Property and equipment, less allowances for depreciation of
$63,730 in 2008 and $75,365 in 2007 |
|
|
23,074 |
|
|
|
49,164 |
|
Current income taxes recoverable |
|
|
14,389 |
|
|
|
7,412 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
305,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
11,170 |
|
|
|
11,170 |
|
Collateral held for securities lending and other transactions |
|
|
67,953 |
|
|
|
186,925 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
41,623 |
|
|
|
32,458 |
|
Assets held in separate accounts |
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
862,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
14,060,814 |
|
|
$ |
13,927,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy liabilities and accruals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index products |
|
$ |
10,531,967 |
|
|
$ |
9,557,073 |
|
Traditional life insurance and accident and health products |
|
|
1,328,506 |
|
|
|
1,284,068 |
|
Unearned revenue reserve |
|
|
34,663 |
|
|
|
28,448 |
|
Other policy claims and benefits |
|
|
38,256 |
|
|
|
31,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,933,392 |
|
|
|
10,900,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholders funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary contracts without life contingencies |
|
|
504,885 |
|
|
|
439,441 |
|
Advance premiums and other deposits |
|
|
167,473 |
|
|
|
158,245 |
|
Accrued dividends |
|
|
10,241 |
|
|
|
11,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
682,599 |
|
|
|
608,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts payable to affiliates |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
59,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt payable to affiliates |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
271,005 |
|
|
|
316,930 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,188 |
|
Collateral payable for securities lending and other transactions |
|
|
69,656 |
|
|
|
202,594 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
108,588 |
|
|
|
104,840 |
|
Liabilities related to separate accounts |
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
862,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
13,802,353 |
|
|
|
13,024,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in subsidiaries |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, without par value, at liquidation value
authorized 10,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 5,000,000
Series B shares |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Class A common stock, without par value authorized 88,500,000
shares, issued and outstanding 28,975,889 shares in 2008 and
28,826,738 shares in 2007 |
|
|
104,090 |
|
|
|
101,221 |
|
Class B common stock, without par value authorized 1,500,000
shares, issued and outstanding 1,192,990 shares |
|
|
7,522 |
|
|
|
7,525 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(649,758 |
) |
|
|
(36,345 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
793,511 |
|
|
|
827,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
258,365 |
|
|
|
902,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
14,060,814 |
|
|
$ |
13,927,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
86
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product charges |
|
$ |
127,199 |
|
|
$ |
114,529 |
|
|
$ |
105,033 |
|
Traditional life insurance premiums |
|
|
149,186 |
|
|
|
144,682 |
|
|
|
138,401 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
707,872 |
|
|
|
628,031 |
|
|
|
535,836 |
|
Derivative income (loss) |
|
|
(208,793 |
) |
|
|
(4,951 |
) |
|
|
70,340 |
|
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
(156,309 |
) |
|
|
5,769 |
|
|
|
13,971 |
|
Other income |
|
|
25,310 |
|
|
|
26,539 |
|
|
|
23,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
644,465 |
|
|
|
914,599 |
|
|
|
887,353 |
|
Benefits and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product benefits |
|
|
440,430 |
|
|
|
442,544 |
|
|
|
338,832 |
|
Change in value of index product embedded derivatives |
|
|
(189,354 |
) |
|
|
(5,907 |
) |
|
|
70,295 |
|
Traditional life insurance benefits |
|
|
96,884 |
|
|
|
90,808 |
|
|
|
90,837 |
|
Increase in traditional life future policy benefits |
|
|
43,255 |
|
|
|
37,682 |
|
|
|
33,500 |
|
Distributions to participating policyholders |
|
|
20,064 |
|
|
|
21,420 |
|
|
|
22,504 |
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses |
|
|
221,393 |
|
|
|
161,820 |
|
|
|
164,518 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
19,567 |
|
|
|
16,666 |
|
|
|
11,744 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
24,104 |
|
|
|
23,760 |
|
|
|
21,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits and expenses |
|
|
676,343 |
|
|
|
788,793 |
|
|
|
753,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,878 |
) |
|
|
125,806 |
|
|
|
133,488 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
13,662 |
|
|
|
(41,051 |
) |
|
|
(44,368 |
) |
Minority interest in loss (earnings) of subsidiaries |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
Equity income (loss), net of related income taxes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18,149 |
) |
|
$ |
86,339 |
|
|
$ |
90,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share assuming dilution |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
2.84 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
87
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B |
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at January 1, 2006 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
72,260 |
|
|
$ |
7,524 |
|
|
$ |
82,301 |
|
|
$ |
679,146 |
|
|
$ |
844,231 |
|
Record underfunded status of
other postretirement benefit
plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,129 |
|
|
|
90,129 |
|
Change in net unrealized
investment gains/losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,232 |
|
Adjustment resulting from capital
transactions of equity investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
Stock-based compensation,
including the issuance of 528,321
common shares under compensation
plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,254 |
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,581 |
) |
|
|
(13,581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
86,462 |
|
|
|
7,519 |
|
|
|
28,195 |
|
|
|
755,544 |
|
|
|
880,720 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,339 |
|
|
|
86,339 |
|
Change in net unrealized
investment gains/losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,520 |
) |
Change in underfunded status
of other postretirement
benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,799 |
|
Adjustment resulting from capital
transactions of equity investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
Stock-based compensation,
including the issuance of 358,076
common shares under compensation
plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,692 |
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,243 |
) |
|
|
(14,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
101,221 |
|
|
|
7,525 |
|
|
|
(36,345 |
) |
|
|
827,490 |
|
|
|
902,891 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,149 |
) |
|
|
(18,149 |
) |
Change in net unrealized
investment gains/losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(613,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(613,431 |
) |
Change in underfunded status
of other postretirement
benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(631,562 |
) |
Change in measurement date of
benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
(770 |
) |
Adjustment resulting from capital
transactions of equity investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Stock-based compensation,
including the issuance of 149,151
common shares under compensation
plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,910 |
) |
|
|
(14,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
104,090 |
|
|
$ |
7,522 |
|
|
$ |
(649,758 |
) |
|
$ |
793,511 |
|
|
$ |
258,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
88
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18,149 |
) |
|
$ |
86,339 |
|
|
$ |
90,129 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments related to interest sensitive and index
products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest credited/index credits to account
balances, excluding deferred sales inducements |
|
|
324,873 |
|
|
|
395,952 |
|
|
|
279,257 |
|
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives |
|
|
(189,354 |
) |
|
|
(5,907 |
) |
|
|
70,295 |
|
Charges for mortality and administration |
|
|
(119,819 |
) |
|
|
(104,989 |
) |
|
|
(96,940 |
) |
Deferral of unearned revenues |
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
Amortization of unearned revenue reserve |
|
|
(2,141 |
) |
|
|
(2,292 |
) |
|
|
(1,666 |
) |
Provision for depreciation and amortization of
property and equipment |
|
|
15,550 |
|
|
|
14,324 |
|
|
|
14,298 |
|
Provision for accretion and amortization of investments |
|
|
(5,366 |
) |
|
|
(10,228 |
) |
|
|
(8,181 |
) |
Realized/unrealized losses (gains) on investments |
|
|
153,416 |
|
|
|
(5,769 |
) |
|
|
(13,971 |
) |
Change in fair value of derivatives |
|
|
170,841 |
|
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
|
(51,853 |
) |
Increase in traditional life and accident and health
benefit accruals |
|
|
44,438 |
|
|
|
39,356 |
|
|
|
38,114 |
|
Policy acquisition costs deferred |
|
|
(159,866 |
) |
|
|
(173,723 |
) |
|
|
(190,955 |
) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
128,114 |
|
|
|
68,394 |
|
|
|
68,541 |
|
Amortization of deferred sales inducements |
|
|
67,860 |
|
|
|
9,555 |
|
|
|
18,745 |
|
Amortization of value of insurance in force |
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
5,069 |
|
|
|
3,458 |
|
Net sale of fixed maturities trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accrued investment income |
|
|
(18,066 |
) |
|
|
(14,162 |
) |
|
|
(21,536 |
) |
Change in amounts receivable from/payable to affiliates |
|
|
(4,748 |
) |
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
(10,866 |
) |
Change in reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
15,805 |
|
|
|
23,130 |
|
|
|
(30,757 |
) |
Change in current income taxes |
|
|
(6,977 |
) |
|
|
(16,152 |
) |
|
|
6,422 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
(2,576 |
) |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
3,397 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,929 |
|
|
|
28,914 |
|
|
|
(63,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
404,075 |
|
|
|
357,652 |
|
|
|
103,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale, maturity or repayment of investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
632,174 |
|
|
|
554,217 |
|
|
|
453,942 |
|
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
15,474 |
|
|
|
19,980 |
|
|
|
32,725 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
60,397 |
|
|
|
56,804 |
|
|
|
79,332 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
32,231 |
|
|
|
104,950 |
|
|
|
104,106 |
|
Investment real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,741 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
Policy loans |
|
|
37,611 |
|
|
|
39,522 |
|
|
|
28,777 |
|
Short-term investments net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777,887 |
|
|
|
785,214 |
|
|
|
834,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
(1,675,422 |
) |
|
|
(1,852,613 |
) |
|
|
(1,963,560 |
) |
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
(12,676 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
(220,667 |
) |
|
|
(298,453 |
) |
|
|
(218,658 |
) |
Derivative instruments |
|
|
(172,840 |
) |
|
|
(104,694 |
) |
|
|
(72,142 |
) |
Investment real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Policy loans |
|
|
(40,542 |
) |
|
|
(39,113 |
) |
|
|
(31,804 |
) |
Short-term investments net |
|
|
(190,454 |
) |
|
|
(27,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,312,601 |
) |
|
|
(2,323,265 |
) |
|
|
(2,286,437 |
) |
89
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Investing activities - continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal, repayments of advances and other
distributions of capital from equity investees |
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
9,931 |
|
Investments in and advances to equity investees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
(1,550 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(14,272 |
) |
|
|
(20,463 |
) |
|
|
(19,630 |
) |
Disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
23,342 |
|
|
|
4,475 |
|
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,525,015 |
) |
|
|
(1,554,762 |
) |
|
|
(1,457,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receipts from interest sensitive and index products
credited to policyholder account balances |
|
|
2,162,398 |
|
|
|
2,010,769 |
|
|
|
2,211,283 |
|
Return of policyholder account balances on interest
sensitive and index products |
|
|
(1,187,442 |
) |
|
|
(935,385 |
) |
|
|
(746,824 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt payable to affiliates |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term debt with affiliates |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of short-term debt with affiliates |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term debt |
|
|
13,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receipts (distributions) related to minority interests net |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
Excess tax deductions on stock-based compensation |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
8,004 |
|
|
|
9,002 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(15,060 |
) |
|
|
(14,393 |
) |
|
|
(13,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,074,635 |
|
|
|
1,168,833 |
|
|
|
1,461,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(46,305 |
) |
|
|
(28,277 |
) |
|
|
107,172 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
84,015 |
|
|
|
112,292 |
|
|
|
5,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
37,710 |
|
|
$ |
84,015 |
|
|
$ |
112,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (refunded) during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
18,843 |
|
|
$ |
15,095 |
|
|
$ |
11,744 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(4,244 |
) |
|
|
56,133 |
|
|
|
33,569 |
|
Non-cash operating activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferral of sales inducements |
|
|
60,824 |
|
|
|
83,713 |
|
|
|
90,454 |
|
Non-cash financing activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of debt from long-term to short-term |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
90
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1) |
|
Significant Accounting Policies |
Nature of Business
FBL Financial Group, Inc. (we or the Company) operates predominantly in the life insurance industry
through its principal subsidiaries, Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company (Farm Bureau Life) and
EquiTrust Life Insurance Company (EquiTrust Life) (collectively, the Life Companies). Farm Bureau
Life markets individual life insurance policies and annuity contracts to Farm Bureau members and
other individuals and businesses in the Midwestern and Western sections of the United States
through an exclusive agency force. EquiTrust Life markets individual annuity products through
independent agents and brokers and variable products through alliances with other insurance
companies. These sales take place throughout the United States. In addition to writing direct
insurance business, EquiTrust Life has assumed closed blocks of life insurance and annuity business
through coinsurance agreements. Several subsidiaries support various functional areas of the Life
Companies and other affiliates, by providing investment advisory, marketing and distribution, and
leasing services. In addition, we manage two Farm Bureau affiliated property-casualty companies.
Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of FBL Financial Group, Inc.
and its direct and indirect subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been
eliminated.
Accounting Changes
On September 30, 2008, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff Position
(FSP) FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is
Not Active. This FSP clarifies the application of Statement No. 157 in a market that is not
active and applies to financial assets within the scope of accounting pronouncements that require
or permit fair value measurements in accordance with Statement No. 157. The impact of this
adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No.
157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and expands the required disclosures about fair value measurements. See Note 4, Fair
Value, for detailed information regarding our fair value measurements. The impact of adoption was
to decrease the carrying value of certain investments and certain policy liabilities and accruals
in our consolidated financial statements, resulting in an increase to net income (loss) of $5.6
million ($0.19 per basic and diluted common share). The primary impact of this change was a
decrease to the embedded derivatives in the index annuity reserves of $26.7 million. The impact of
this change on net income (loss) was mitigated by offsets for the amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements and income taxes.
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted the measurement date portion of Statement No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). This portion of Statement No. 158 requires
measurement of a plans assets and benefit obligations as of the end of the employers fiscal year.
We adopted the measurement date portion of this Statement, using the single measurement date
method, which resulted in a decrease to retained earnings totaling $0.8 million.
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted FSP FIN 39-1, which amends certain aspects of FASB
Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to
Certain Contracts an interpretation of
APB Opinion No. 10 and FASB Statement No. 105. This FSP allows a reporting entity to offset fair
value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation
to return cash collateral (a payable) against fair value amounts recognized for derivative
instruments executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement. We
elected to implement this statement and have adopted a policy to offset the collateral against the
derivatives. At December 31, 2008, we had master netting agreements with counterparties covering
cash collateral payable totaling $10.9 million and cash collateral receivable totaling $9.7
million. These amounts are netted against the fair value of the call options included in
derivative instruments and interest rate swaps included in other
91
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2007, we had master netting
agreements with counterparties covering cash collateral payable totaling $70.9 million and cash
collateral receivable totaling $7.5 million. These amounts have been restated in the prior year
balance sheet. Any excess collateral that remains after the netting is included in the collateral
held or payable for securities lending and other transactions on our consolidated balance sheets.
We held excess collateral totaling $0.1 million at December 31, 2007. We did not have any excess
collateral at December 31, 2008. This FSP has no impact on our consolidated statements of
operations.
During 2009, we plan to adopt Statement No. 160, Accounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling
Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51, which was issued by the
FASB in December 2007. This Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling (minority) interest in a subsidiary, which requires that the minority interest be
reported in equity, and the related net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) be included
in the respective lines of the consolidated financial statements. This Statement is effective for
the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is
prohibited. The impact of this adoption on our consolidated financial statements is expected to be
immaterial and will primarily result in a reclassification of minority interest as noted above.
In November 2008, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 08-6, Equity Method
Investment Accounting Considerations. EITF No. 08-6 establishes accounting and reporting standards
for valuing equity method investees and their equity transactions. EITF No. 08-6 will be effective
in the first quarter of 2009 and early adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the adoption of
EITF No. 08-6 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Investments
Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities
Fixed maturity securities, comprised of bonds and redeemable preferred stocks, which may be sold,
are designated as available for sale. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value
and unrealized gains and losses on these securities, with the exception of unrealized gains and
losses relating to the conversion feature embedded in convertible fixed maturity securities, are
included directly in stockholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss). Unrealized gains and losses relating to the conversion feature embedded in convertible
fixed maturity securities are recorded as a component of derivative income (loss) in the
consolidated statements of operations. The unrealized gains and losses are reduced by a provision
for deferred income taxes and adjustments to deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred sales
inducements, value of insurance in force acquired and unearned revenue reserve that would have been
required as a charge or credit to income had such amounts been realized.
Fixed maturity securities that are purchased with the intent to sell within a short period of time
are classified as trading. These securities are carried at fair value and unrealized gains and
losses are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as a component of
realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments. Premiums and discounts are amortized/accrued
using methods which result in a constant yield over the securities expected lives.
Amortization/accrual of premiums and discounts on mortgage and asset-backed securities incorporates
prepayment assumptions to estimate the securities expected lives.
Equity securities, comprised of common and non-redeemable preferred stocks are designated as
available for sale and are reported at fair value. The change in unrealized appreciation and
depreciation of equity securities is included directly in stockholders equity, net of any related
deferred income taxes, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
Mortgage loans on real estate are reported at cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and
accrual of discounts. If we determine that the value of any mortgage loan is impaired (i.e., when
it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of
the loan agreement), the carrying value of the mortgage loan is
92
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
reduced to its fair value, which may be based upon the present value of expected future cash flows
from the loan, or the fair value of the underlying collateral. The carrying value of impaired
loans is reduced by the establishment of a valuation allowance, changes to which are recognized as
realized gains or losses on investments. Interest income on impaired loans is recorded on a cash
basis.
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments include interest rate swaps used to reduce our exposure to increases in
market interest rates and call options used to fund index credits on index annuities. In addition,
we have embedded derivatives associated with our index annuity business and certain modified
coinsurance contracts. All derivatives are measured at fair value and recognized as either assets
or liabilities, net of related collateral receivable or payable, in the consolidated balance
sheets.
Interest rate swaps are carried on the consolidated balance sheets as either a derivative
instrument or other liability. The swap on our line of credit and, prior to April 1, 2007, the
swaps related to our flexible premium deferred annuity contracts are accounted for as cash flow
hedges. The effective portion of any unrealized gain or loss is recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). If a portion of the hedges becomes ineffective, the ineffective
portion of any unrealized gain or loss on the swap will be recorded in earnings as a component of
derivative income (loss) as it occurs. Prior to April 1, 2007, the net periodic interest
settlement between the interest paid and the interest received under the swaps hedging our annuity
contracts was recorded as a component of interest sensitive and index product benefits.
For derivatives not designated as a hedging instrument, including the swaps hedging our annuity
contracts after April 1, 2007, the change in fair value is recognized in earnings in the period of
change. See Accounting Changes above and Note 3, Derivative Instruments, for more information
regarding our derivative instruments, embedded derivatives and the change in accounting change for
interest rate swaps.
Investment Real Estate
Investment real estate is reported at cost less allowances for depreciation, as applicable. The
carrying value of these assets is subject to regular review. For properties not held for sale, if
indicators of impairment are present and a propertys expected undiscounted cash flows are not
sufficient to recover the propertys carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized and the
propertys cost basis is reduced to fair value. If the fair value, less estimated sales costs, of
real estate held for sale decreases to an amount lower than its carrying value, the carrying value
of the real estate is reduced by the establishment of a valuation allowance, changes to which are
recognized as realized gains or losses on investments. There were no real estate investments
requiring a valuation allowance at December 31, 2008 or 2007.
Other Investments
Policy loans are reported at unpaid principal balance. Short-term investments are reported at cost
adjusted for amortization of premiums and accrual of discounts. Other long-term investments
include an investment deposit which is reported at amortized cost. In 2008, other long-term
investments also includes our ownership interest in aircraft acquired in the troubled debt
restructuring with a bond issuer that filed for bankruptcy. This investment is reported at cost,
less accumulated depreciation.
Securities and indebtedness of related parties include investments in corporations and partnerships
over which we may exercise significant influence. These corporations and partnerships operate
predominately in the insurance, broker/dealer, investment company and real estate industries. Such
investments are generally accounted for using the equity method. In applying the equity method, we
record our share of income or loss reported by the equity investees. For partnerships operating in
the investment company industry, this income or loss includes changes in unrealized gains and
losses in the partnerships investment portfolios. Changes in the value of our investment in
equity investees attributable to capital transactions of the investee, such as an additional
offering of stock, are recorded directly to stockholders equity.
93
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Collateral Held/Payable for Securities Lending and Other Transactions
We participate in a securities lending program whereby certain fixed maturity securities from our
investment portfolio are loaned to other institutions for a short period of time. We require
collateral equal to or greater than 102% of the fair value of the loaned securities and at least
100% collateral be maintained through the period the securities are on loan. The collateral is
invested by the lending agent, in accordance with our guidelines, generating fee income that is
recognized as net investment income over the period the securities are on loan. The collateral is
accounted for as a secured borrowing and is recorded as an asset on the consolidated balance
sheets, with a corresponding liability reflecting our obligation to return this collateral upon the
return of the loaned securities. During the second quarter of 2008 we discontinued entering into
any new securities lending agreements and we expect the existing loaned securities to decrease in
2009 as the underlying collateral matures.
We also obtain or are required to provide collateral relating to certain derivative transactions.
We invest cash collateral received and record a liability for amounts owed to counterparties for
these transactions. We record an asset for amounts due from counterparties when we are required to
provide collateral. See Note 2, Investment Operations, for more information regarding our
collateral.
Accrued Investment Income
We discontinue the accrual of investment income on invested assets when it is determined that
collection is uncertain.
Realized/Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments
Realized gains and losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of specific
identification. This line item also includes the change in unrealized gains and losses on trading
securities. The carrying values of all our investments are reviewed on an ongoing basis for credit
deterioration. If this review indicates a decline in fair value that is other than temporary, the
carrying value of the investment is reduced to its fair value and a specific write down is taken.
Such reductions in carrying value are recognized as realized losses on investments. For fixed
maturity securities and equity securities, the fair value becomes the new cost basis for the
security and the cost basis is generally not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value.
However, for fixed maturity securities for which we can reasonably estimate future cash flows after
a write down, the discount or reduced premium recorded, based on the new cost basis, is amortized
over the remaining life of the security. Amortization in this instance is computed using the
prospective method and the current estimate of the amount and timing of future cash flows. It is
difficult to estimate cash flows on securities that have been written down for an
other-than-temporary impairment due to the inherent variability of cash flows associated with
distressed securities. Net investment income for 2008 includes accretion totaling $0.4 million on
five previously impaired securities, with maturity dates prior to 2011. Net investment income for
2007 includes accretion totaling $0.5 million on two previously impaired securities that matured in
2008. No such accretion was recorded in 2006.
Fair Values
Fair values of fixed maturity securities are based on quoted market prices in active markets when
available. Fair values of fixed maturity securities that are not actively traded are estimated
using valuation models that vary by asset class. See Note 4, Fair Values of Financial
Instruments, for more information on assumptions and the amount of securities priced using the
valuation models. Fair values for all securities are reviewed for reasonableness by considering
overall market conditions and values for similar securities.
Fair values of the conversion features embedded in convertible fixed maturity securities are
estimated using an option-pricing model. Fair values of redeemable preferred stocks, equity
securities, call options and interest rate swaps are based on the latest quoted market prices, or
for those stocks not readily marketable, generally at values which are representative of the fair
values of comparable issues. In addition, fair values for all derivative instruments include a
credit risk adjustment for the liable party.
94
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of our consolidated statements of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid debt
instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash
collateral received for derivative positions is invested in cash equivalents and reported with
derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheets.
Reinsurance Recoverable
We use reinsurance to manage certain risks associated with our insurance operations. These
reinsurance arrangements provide for greater diversification of business, allow management to
control exposure to potential risks arising from large claims and provide additional capacity for
growth. For business ceded to other companies, reinsurance recoverable generally consists of the
reinsurers share of policyholder liabilities, claims and expenses, net of amounts due the
reinsurers for premiums. For business assumed from other companies, reinsurance recoverable
generally consists of premium receivable, net of our share of benefits and expenses we owe to the
ceding company.
We assume, under coinsurance agreements, certain fixed rate and index annuity contracts. Call
options used to fund index credits on the assumed index annuities are purchased by and maintained
on the books of the ceding company. We record our proportionate share of the option value
supporting the business we reinsure as reinsurance recoverable on the consolidated balance sheets
at fair value.
Fair values for the embedded derivatives in our modified coinsurance contracts are based on the
difference between the fair value and the cost basis of the underlying investments. Fair values
for the embedded derivatives in our reinsurance recoverable relating to call options are based on
quoted market prices adjusted for a credit risk component. See Note 3, Derivative Instruments,
for more information regarding call options and see Note 5, Reinsurance and Policy Provisions,
for additional details on our reinsurance agreements.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Deferred Sales Inducements and Value of Insurance In Force
Acquired
Deferred policy acquisition costs include certain costs of acquiring new insurance business,
principally commissions and other expenses related to the production of new business, to the extent
recoverable from future policy revenues and gross profits. Deferred sales inducements include
premium bonuses and bonus interest credited to contracts during the first contract year only. The
value of insurance in force acquired represents the cost assigned to insurance contracts when an
insurance company is acquired. The initial value is determined by an actuarial study using
expected future gross profits as a measurement of the net present value of the insurance acquired.
Interest accrued on the unamortized balance at a weighted average rate of 4.89% in 2008, 4.96% in
2007 and 4.95% in 2006.
For participating traditional life insurance, interest sensitive and index products, these costs
are being amortized generally in proportion to expected gross profits (after dividends to
policyholders, if applicable) from surrender charges and investment, mortality and expense margins.
That amortization is adjusted retrospectively through an unlocking process when estimates of
current or future gross profits/margins (including the impact of investment gains and losses) to be
realized from a group of products are revised. For nonparticipating traditional life products,
these costs are amortized over the premium paying period of the related policies, in proportion to
the ratio of annual premium revenues to total anticipated premium revenues. Such anticipated
premium revenues are estimated using the same assumptions used for computing liabilities for future
policy benefits.
Late in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the beginning of 2009, we experienced an unanticipated
increase in surrender and withdrawal rates on annuities sold through our independent distribution
channel, primarily due to the impact of low U.S. Treasury yields on the market value adjustment
feature for our direct fixed annuity products, which provided an environment where contract holders
could surrender with smaller net surrender charges. This unanticipated activity required us to
update the assumptions in our amortization models, which decreased deferred policy acquisition
costs $17.0 million and deferred sales inducements $12.6 million in 2008. After taxes, this
increased the 2008 net loss $19.2 million ($0.64 per basic and diluted common share).
95
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, comprised primarily of furniture, equipment and capitalized software costs,
are reported at cost less allowances for depreciation and amortization. At December 31, 2008, it
also includes $6.6 million in assets held for sale, which are reported at fair value. Depreciation
and amortization expense is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets. Furniture and equipment had a carrying value of $9.4 million at
December 31, 2008 and $33.4 million at December 31, 2007, and estimated useful lives that generally
range from two to twenty years. Capitalized software costs had a carrying value of $13.7 million
at December 31, 2008 and $15.8 million at December 31, 2007, and estimated useful lives that range
from two to five years. Depreciation expense for furniture and equipment was $8.4 million in 2008,
$9.0 million in 2007 and $9.4 million in 2006. Amortization expense for capitalized software was
$7.2 million in 2008, $5.3 million in 2007 and $4.9 million in 2006.
In December 2008, we sold furniture, office equipment, computer equipment and vehicles to two
leasing companies. These assets were subsequently leased by Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
(Farm Bureau Mutual), an affiliate, under an operating lease. We have entered into an expense
allocation agreement with Farm Bureau Mutual permitting the continued use of certain assets in our
operation. We recognized a loss of $0.3 million on the sale of these assets.
Goodwill
Goodwill includes $9.9 million related to the excess of the amounts paid to acquire companies over
the fair value of its net assets acquired. Goodwill also includes $1.2 million of identifiable
intangible assets relating to insurance licenses obtained with the acquisition of EquiTrust Life
Insurance Company. Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives are not
amortized but are subject to annual impairment testing. We test our goodwill balances by comparing
the fair value of our reporting units to the carrying value of the goodwill. In the event that we
were to dispose one of our reporting units, a discounted cash flow approach would be used to
estimate the fair value of that reporting unit; therefore we believe this approach better
approximates the fair value of our goodwill than a market capitalization approach. A number of
significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the application of the discounted cash flow
model to forecast operating cash flows, including future premiums, product lapses, investment
yields and discount rate. Underlying assumptions are based on historical experience and our best
estimates given information available at the time of testing. We have performed impairment testing
using cash flow and other analyses and determined none of our goodwill was impaired as of December
31, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
Future Policy Benefits
Future policy benefit reserves for interest sensitive products are computed under a retrospective
deposit method and represent policy account balances before applicable surrender charges. Future
policy benefit reserves for index annuities are equal to the sum of the fair value of the embedded
index options, accumulated index credits and the host contract reserve computed using a method
similar to that used for interest sensitive products. Fair value of the index options are
calculated using discounted cash flow valuation techniques based on current interest rates adjusted
to reflect our credit risk and an additional provision for adverse deviation. Policy benefits and
claims that are charged to expense include benefit claims incurred in the period in excess of
related policy account balances.
For our direct business, interest crediting rates for interest sensitive products ranged from 3.00%
to 6.00% in 2008 and from 2.65% to 5.50% in 2007 and 2006. For interest sensitive products assumed
through coinsurance agreements, interest crediting rates ranged from
3.10% to 5.10% in 2008 and from 3.00%
to 6.00% in 2007 and 2006. A portion of the interest credited on our direct business ($7.1 million
in 2008, $9.6 million in 2007 and $3.9 million in 2006) represents an additional interest credit on
first-year premiums, payable at policy issue or until the first contract anniversary date
(first-year bonus interest). These amounts are included as deferred sales inducements.
The liability for future policy benefits for direct participating traditional life insurance is
based on net level premium reserves, including assumptions as to interest, mortality and other
factors underlying the guaranteed policy cash values. Reserve interest assumptions are level and
range from 2.00% to 6.00%. The average rate of assumed
96
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
investment yields used in estimating gross margins was 6.27% in 2008, 6.32% in 2007 and 6.33% in
2006. Accrued dividends for participating business are established for anticipated amounts earned
to date that have not been paid. The declaration of future dividends for participating business is
at the discretion of the Board of Directors of Farm Bureau Life. Participating business accounted
for 41% of direct receipts from policyholders during 2008 (2007 and 2006 42%) and represented 13%
of life insurance in force at December 31, 2008 (2007 13% and 2006 14%). The liability for
future policy benefits for non-participating traditional life insurance is computed using a net
level method, including assumptions as to mortality, persistency and interest and includes
provisions for possible unfavorable deviations.
The liabilities for future policy benefits for accident and health insurance are computed using a
net level (or an equivalent) method, including assumptions as to morbidity, mortality and interest
and include provisions for possible unfavorable deviations. Policy benefit claims are charged to
expense in the period that the claims are incurred.
The unearned revenue reserve reflects the unamortized balance of charges assessed to interest
sensitive contract holders to compensate us for services to be performed over future periods
(policy initiation fees). These charges have been deferred and are being recognized in income over
the period benefited using the same assumptions and factors used to amortize deferred policy
acquisition costs.
Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are computed based on the difference between the
financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax
rate. Deferred income tax expenses or credits are based on the changes in the asset or liability
from period to period.
Separate Accounts
The separate account assets and liabilities reported in our accompanying consolidated balance
sheets represent funds that are separately administered for the benefit of certain policyholders
that bear the underlying investment risk. The separate account assets and liabilities are carried
at fair value. Revenues and expenses related to the separate account assets and liabilities, to
the extent of benefits paid or provided to the separate account policyholders, are excluded from
the amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Recognition of Premium Revenues and Costs
Revenues for interest sensitive, index and variable products consist of policy charges for the cost
of insurance, asset charges, administration charges, amortization of policy initiation fees and
surrender charges assessed against policyholder account balances. The timing of revenue
recognition as it relates to these charges and fees is determined based on the nature of such
charges and fees. Policy charges for the cost of insurance, asset charges and policy
administration charges are assessed on a daily or monthly basis and are recognized as revenue when
assessed and earned. Certain policy initiation fees that represent compensation for services to be
provided in the future are reported as unearned revenue and recognized in income over the periods
benefited. Surrender charges are determined based upon contractual terms and are recognized upon
surrender of a contract. Policy benefits and claims charged to expense include interest or index
amounts credited to policyholder account balances (excluding sales inducements) and benefit claims
incurred in excess of policyholder account balances during the period. Changes in the reserves for
the embedded derivatives in the index annuities and amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs and deferred sales inducements are recognized as expenses over the life of the policy.
During 2006, we reduced our reserves for the embedded derivative in our coinsured index annuities
$7.1 million. This adjustment, which is the correction of an overstatement that started in 2001,
increased 2006 net income $2.6 million ($0.09 per basic and diluted common share) after offsets for
taxes and the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.
The impact to the financial statement line items and prior period financial statements affected by
this overstatement is not material. This adjustment does not impact our segment results as the
segment results are based on operating income (loss) which, as explained in Note 14, exclude the
impact of changes in the valuation of derivatives.
97
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Traditional life insurance premiums are recognized as revenues over the premium-paying period.
Future policy benefits and policy acquisition costs are recognized as expenses over the life of the
policy by means of the provision for future policy benefits and amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.
All insurance-related revenues, benefits and expenses are reported net of reinsurance ceded. The
cost of reinsurance ceded is generally amortized over the contract periods of the reinsurance
agreements. Policies and contracts assumed are accounted for in a manner similar to that followed
for direct business.
Underwriting, Acquisition and Insurance Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission expense, net of deferrals |
|
$ |
13,613 |
|
|
$ |
13,906 |
|
|
$ |
13,497 |
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
128,114 |
|
|
|
68,394 |
|
|
|
68,541 |
|
Amortization of value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
5,069 |
|
|
|
3,458 |
|
Other underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses, net of
deferrals |
|
|
76,961 |
|
|
|
74,451 |
|
|
|
79,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
221,393 |
|
|
$ |
161,820 |
|
|
$ |
164,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Deferred Sales Inducements and Value of Insurance In
Force Acquired section above regarding the impact of an unlocking adjustment in 2008 on
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses include a pre-tax charge of $4.9 million ($0.11
per basic and diluted common share) for 2006 relating to the settlement of a lawsuit with a husband
and wife who had applied for life insurance policies. The settlement ended litigation regarding
the process we followed in denying insurance coverage for medical reasons. The settlement was
entered into after adverse judicial rulings were made against us in June 2006. Prior to the
issuance of the adverse judicial rulings, a material loss, net of insurance recoveries, was not
deemed to be reasonably possible.
Insurance claims have been filed under our professional liability and general liability insurance
policies for reimbursement of the settlement amount, but coverage has been denied, and we have made
a claim against an insurance broker for breach of contractual duties. We have filed lawsuits
against the insurer and the insurance broker to recover those damages. While we have received an
adverse ruling in the case against the insurer at the district court level, the adverse ruling has
been appealed and we continue to believe both claims are valid. Recoveries from third parties are
required to be accounted for as gain contingencies and not recorded in our financial statements
until the lawsuits are resolved. Accordingly, our financial statements for 2006 include the $4.9
million settlement expense, but any recoveries will be recorded in net income (loss) in the period
the recovery is received.
Other Income and Other Expenses
Other income and other expenses consist primarily of revenue and expenses generated by our various
non-insurance subsidiaries for investment advisory, marketing and distribution, and leasing
services. They also include revenues and expenses generated by our parent company for management
services. Certain of these activities are performed on behalf of our affiliates. In addition,
certain revenues generated by our insurance subsidiaries are classified as other income. Revenues
of the insurance subsidiaries included as other income totaled $2.8 million in 2008, $3.2 million
in 2007 and $1.7 million in 2006. Lease income from leases with affiliates totaled $11.1 million
in 2008, $12.2 million in 2007 and $12.0 million in 2006. Investment advisory fee income from
affiliates totaled $1.4 million in 2008 and $1.5 million in 2007 and 2006.
98
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Retirement and Compensation Plans
We participate with several affiliates and an unaffiliated organization in various multiemployer
defined benefit plans. We employ a long-term investment strategy of maintaining diversified plan
assets in equity securities and deposit administration fund contracts. The expected return on plan
assets is set at the long-term rate expected to be earned based on the long term investment
strategy of the plans for assets at the end of the reporting period.
We also have two share-based payment arrangements under our Class A Common Stock Compensation Plan.
We recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments granted, modified or settled. The
non performance related stock-based expense is recognized over the shorter of our five-year vesting
schedule or the period ending when the employee becomes eligible for retirement using the
straight-line method. The performance related stock-based expense is recorded on the number of
shares expected to vest and is recognized over the required service period. The impact of
forfeitures is estimated and compensation expense is recognized only for those stock-based
instruments expected to vest. We report tax deductions related to stock-based instruments in
excess of recognized compensation expense as a financing cash flow.
See Note 9, Retirement and Compensation Plans, for additional details on these plans.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Unrealized gains and losses on our available-for-sale securities and certain interest rate swaps
are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders equity. Other
comprehensive income (loss) excludes net investment gains and losses included in net income (loss)
which represent transfers from unrealized to realized gains and losses, which totaled ($75.3)
million in 2008, $2.7 million in 2007 and $7.9 million in 2006. These amounts, which have been
measured through the date of sale, are net of income taxes and adjustments to deferred policy
acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, value of insurance in force acquired and unearned
revenue reserve totaling $73.3 million in 2008, ($0.3) million in 2007 and ($4.0) million in 2006.
Other comprehensive income (loss) also includes the initial recognition and subsequent changes in
the underfunded status of our single employer health and medical postretirement benefit plans
totaling $0.2 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Dividend Restriction
We have agreed that we will not pay dividends on the Class A or Class B Common Stock, nor on the
Series B Preferred Stock, if we are in default of our line of credit agreement with Bank of America
National Association (formerly LaSalle Bank National Association), or in default of the
Subordinated Deferrable Interest Note Agreement Dated May 30, 1997 with FBL Financial Group Capital
Trust. We are compliant with all terms for both agreements at December 31, 2008. See Note 7,
Credit Arrangements, for additional information regarding these agreements.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to the 2008 financial statement presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. For example, significant estimates and assumptions are utilized in the valuation of
investments, determination of other-than-temporary impairments of investments, amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements, calculation of policyholder
liabilities and accruals and determination of pension expense. It is reasonably possible that
actual experience could differ from the estimates and assumptions utilized which could have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
99
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2) Investment Operations
Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities
Available For Sale Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities by Investment Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
5,810,370 |
|
|
$ |
46,177 |
|
|
$ |
(1,026,918 |
) |
|
$ |
4,829,629 |
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
3,002,190 |
|
|
|
46,573 |
|
|
|
(478,994 |
) |
|
|
2,569,769 |
|
United States Government and
agencies |
|
|
242,033 |
|
|
|
12,891 |
|
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
|
|
250,893 |
|
State, municipal and other
governments |
|
|
1,445,491 |
|
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
(139,430 |
) |
|
|
1,310,626 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
$ |
10,505,084 |
|
|
$ |
110,206 |
|
|
$ |
(1,649,847 |
) |
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
51,958 |
|
|
$ |
4,173 |
|
|
$ |
(11,268 |
) |
|
$ |
44,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
5,057,919 |
|
|
$ |
101,688 |
|
|
$ |
(163,225 |
) |
|
$ |
4,996,382 |
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
2,772,552 |
|
|
|
16,052 |
|
|
|
(102,631 |
) |
|
|
2,685,973 |
|
United States Government and
agencies |
|
|
550,410 |
|
|
|
8,454 |
|
|
|
(4,524 |
) |
|
|
554,340 |
|
State, municipal and other
governments |
|
|
1,248,887 |
|
|
|
19,118 |
|
|
|
(15,106 |
) |
|
|
1,252,899 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
33,218 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
|
32,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
$ |
9,662,986 |
|
|
$ |
146,681 |
|
|
$ |
(287,075 |
) |
|
$ |
9,522,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
22,410 |
|
|
$ |
1,290 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
23,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments have been excluded from the above schedules as amortized cost approximates
fair value for these securities. The increase in equity securities in 2008 is primarily due to the
reclassification of non-redeemable perpetual preferred securities with a fair value totaling $28.0
million, which were previously classified with fixed maturity securities, and additional
acquisitions of these types of securities during 2008.
100
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Available For Sale Fixed Maturity Securities by Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
117,268 |
|
|
$ |
113,169 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
1,182,860 |
|
|
|
1,045,741 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
2,949,740 |
|
|
|
2,458,698 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
3,248,026 |
|
|
|
2,773,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,497,894 |
|
|
|
6,391,148 |
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
3,002,190 |
|
|
|
2,569,769 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,505,084 |
|
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right
to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
$ |
(1,539,641 |
) |
|
$ |
(140,394 |
) |
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
(7,095 |
) |
|
|
1,223 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(3,250 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,549,986 |
) |
|
|
(139,762 |
) |
Adjustments for assumed changes in amortization pattern of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
398,192 |
|
|
|
55,490 |
|
Deferred sales inducements |
|
|
134,157 |
|
|
|
28,237 |
|
Value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
25,235 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
Unearned revenue reserve |
|
|
(6,941 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
349,794 |
|
|
|
19,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649,549 |
) |
|
|
(36,141 |
) |
Proportionate share of net unrealized investment gains of
equity investees |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized investment losses |
|
$ |
(649,547 |
) |
|
$ |
(36,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in net unrealized investment gains and losses are recorded net of deferred income
taxes and other adjustments for assumed changes in the amortization pattern of deferred policy
acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, value of insurance in force acquired and unearned
revenue reserve totaling $796.8 million in 2008, $115.9 million in 2007 and $48.1 million in 2006.
101
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fixed Maturity Securities with Unrealized Losses by Length of Time Unrealized
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year |
|
|
One year or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Description of Securities |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
2,416,471 |
|
|
$ |
(369,595 |
) |
|
$ |
1,514,634 |
|
|
$ |
(657,323 |
) |
|
$ |
3,931,105 |
|
|
$ |
(1,026,918 |
) |
Mortgage and
asset-backed
securities |
|
|
527,498 |
|
|
|
(106,413 |
) |
|
|
1,067,078 |
|
|
|
(372,581 |
) |
|
|
1,594,576 |
|
|
|
(478,994 |
) |
United States
Government and
agencies |
|
|
31,052 |
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
33,514 |
|
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
State, municipal and
other governments |
|
|
783,887 |
|
|
|
(64,310 |
) |
|
|
384,632 |
|
|
|
(75,120 |
) |
|
|
1,168,519 |
|
|
|
(139,430 |
) |
Redeemable preferred
stocks |
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
$ |
3,763,434 |
|
|
$ |
(544,792 |
) |
|
$ |
2,968,806 |
|
|
$ |
(1,105,055 |
) |
|
$ |
6,732,240 |
|
|
$ |
(1,649,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
|
Less than one year |
|
|
One year or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Description of Securities |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
1,177,231 |
|
|
$ |
(58,031 |
) |
|
$ |
1,309,243 |
|
|
$ |
(105,194 |
) |
|
$ |
2,486,474 |
|
|
$ |
(163,225 |
) |
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
611,532 |
|
|
|
(40,452 |
) |
|
|
1,119,265 |
|
|
|
(62,179 |
) |
|
|
1,730,797 |
|
|
|
(102,631 |
) |
United States
Government and
agencies |
|
|
51,200 |
|
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
97,204 |
|
|
|
(4,152 |
) |
|
|
148,404 |
|
|
|
(4,524 |
) |
State, municipal and
other governments |
|
|
142,733 |
|
|
|
(3,343 |
) |
|
|
386,840 |
|
|
|
(11,763 |
) |
|
|
529,573 |
|
|
|
(15,106 |
) |
Redeemable preferred
stocks |
|
|
5,425 |
|
|
|
(1,575 |
) |
|
|
4,986 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
10,411 |
|
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed
maturities |
|
$ |
1,988,121 |
|
|
$ |
(103,773 |
) |
|
$ |
2,917,538 |
|
|
$ |
(183,302 |
) |
|
$ |
4,905,659 |
|
|
$ |
(287,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the above table are 1,442 securities from 937 issuers at December 31, 2008 and 863
securities from 538 issuers at December 31, 2007. These increases are primarily due to an increase
in spreads between the risk-free and corporate and other bond yields. The following summarizes the
more significant unrealized losses by investment category as of December 31, 2008.
Corporate securities: The unrealized losses on corporate securities, including redeemable
preferred stocks, totaled $1,027.4 million, or 62.4% of our total unrealized losses. The largest
losses were in the financial services sector ($1,132.8 million carrying value and $547.6 million
unrealized loss). The largest unrealized losses in the financial services sector were in the
holding and other investment offices sector ($421.6 million carrying value and $261.0 million
unrealized loss) and the depository institutions sector ($337.2 million carrying value and $159.3
million unrealized loss). The majority of unrealized losses in the holding and other investment
offices sector are commercial real estate investment trust bonds and synthetic collateralized debt
obligations. The unrealized losses in the real estate investment trust bonds are primarily due to
an increase in credit spreads due to the sectors exposure to commercial real estate and market
concerns about the ability to access the capital markets. The unrealized losses in the synthetic
collateralized debt obligations are explained below. The unrealized losses in the depository
institutions sector are primarily due to a decrease in market liquidity and concerns regarding the
underlying credit quality of subprime and other assets held by foreign or large national and
regional domestic banks.
The manufacturing sector ($922.0 million carrying value and $183.4 million unrealized loss) had a
concentration of losses in the paper and allied products sector ($87.5 million carrying value and
$37.9 million unrealized loss), the printing and publishing sector ($46.6 million carrying value
and $16.0 million unrealized loss) and the food and
102
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
related products sector ($151.9 million carrying value and $15.9 million unrealized loss). The
unrealized losses in these three sectors are due to spread widening that is the result of weaker
operating results. The unrealized losses in the remaining corporate sectors are also primarily
attributable to spread widening due to a decrease in market liquidity, and increase in market
volatility and concerns about the general health of the economy.
Because we have the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value,
which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired
at December 31, 2008.
Mortgage and asset-backed securities: The unrealized losses on mortgage and asset-backed
securities totaled $479.0 million, or 28.9% of our total unrealized losses, and were caused
primarily by concerns regarding mortgage defaults on subprime and other risky mortgages. There
were also concerns regarding potential downgrades or defaults of monoline bond insurers providing
credit protection for underlying securities. These concerns resulted in spread widening in the
sector as liquidity decreased in the market. We purchased most of these investments at a discount
to their face amount and the contractual cash flows of these investments are based on mortgages and
other assets backing the securities. Because we have the ability and intent to hold these
investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, we do not consider these
investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008.
United States Government and agencies: The unrealized losses on U.S. Governments and agencies
totaled $4.0 million, or 0.2% of our total unrealized losses, and were caused by spread widening.
We purchased most of these investments at a discount to their face amount and the contractual cash
flows of these investments are based on direct guarantees from the U.S. Government and by agencies
of the U.S. Government. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to increases in general
market spreads and market interest rates and not credit quality, and because we have the ability
and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, we do
not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008.
State, municipal and other governments: The unrealized losses on state, municipal and other
governments totaled $139.4 million, or 8.4% of our total unrealized losses, and were primarily
caused by general spread widening and concerns regarding the stability of the credit quality of the
monoline bond insurers. We purchased most of these investments at a discount to their face amount
and the contractual cash flows of these investments are based on the taxing authority of a
municipality or the revenues of a municipal project. Because the decline in fair value is
primarily attributable to increased spreads and concerns regarding the stability of the monoline
bond insurers, and because we have the ability and intent to hold these investments until a
recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008.
Excluding mortgage and asset-backed securities, no securities from the same issuer had an aggregate
unrealized loss in excess of $16.7 million at December 31, 2008. The $16.7 million unrealized loss
is from one BB rated security, which is a synthetic collateralized debt obligation backed by
investment grade credit default swaps. This security has been impacted by the loss of market
liquidity, actual defaults in the collateral and spread widening. We have the ability and intent
to hold this security until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity and therefore, do not
consider it to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008. With respect to mortgage
and asset-backed securities not backed by the United States Government, no securities from the same
issuer had an aggregate unrealized loss in excess of $66.8 million at December 31, 2008. The $66.8
million unrealized loss from one issuer relates to 21 different securities that are backed by
different pools of residential mortgage loans. All but one of the 21 securities are rated
investment grade and the largest unrealized loss on any one security totaled $9.4 million at
December 31, 2008. The non-investment grade security had an unrealized loss of $2.1 million at
December 31, 2008. We have the intent and ability to hold these investments until a recovery of
fair value, which may be at maturity, and therefore do not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporary impaired at December 31, 2008.
Excluding mortgage and asset-backed securities and one collateralized debt obligation that was
impaired during 2008 (see discussion that follows), our largest exposure to securities from any one
issuer had an aggregate unrealized loss of $4.5 million at December 31, 2007. With respect to
mortgage and asset-backed securities not
103
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
backed by the United States Government, no securities from the same issuer had an aggregate
unrealized loss in excess of $17.9 million at December 31, 2007. The $17.9 million unrealized loss
from one issuer relates to 14 different securities that are backed by different pools of
residential mortgage loans. All 14 securities are rated investment grade and the largest
unrealized loss on any one security totaled $5.9 million at December 31, 2007.
Our investments in synthetic collateralized debt obligations are backed by credit default swaps
with no home equity exposure. These securities have a carrying value of $7.4 million and
unrealized loss of $44.6 million at December 31, 2008 and a carrying value of $42.1 million and
unrealized loss of $9.9 million at December 31, 2007. The unrealized loss increased in 2008
primarily due to actual defaults in the collateral, general spread widening and market concerns of
increased defaults in the future. Our investment professionals have stress tested all of these
securities and determined that future principal losses are not expected based on reasonably adverse
conditions. Assuming a 35% recovery, on average these investments could all withstand seven to
twelve more defaults without losing any principal. The number of defaults is an estimate based on
the remaining credit enhancement (subordination) that remains in each security. Each default that
occurs reduces subordination to the security, depending on the loss amount and exposure. Depending
on the investment, the synthetic collateralized debt obligations we own have exposure to
approximately 120 to 150 reference names, which results in an average default level of 5.0% to
10.0% before we would lose principal. Based on historical performance and current economic
conditions, we do not expect future defaults will exceed these levels and believe the existing
subordination is sufficient to maintain the value of our investments. In addition, we have the
intent and ability to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity,
therefore we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December
31, 2008.
In addition, one collateralized debt obligation partially backed by subprime mortgages was written
down during the first and second quarters of 2008 to the estimated fair value of $0.2 million.
This security had an amortized cost of $10.0 million and a fair value of $1.5 million at December
31, 2007. This security was sold during the third quarter of 2008 for the estimated fair value of
$0.2 million.
We also have $11.3 million of gross unrealized losses on equity securities with an estimated fair
value of $44.9 million at December 31, 2008 and $0.1 million of gross unrealized losses on equity
securities with an estimated fair value of $0.7 million at December 31, 2007. The majority of the
unrealized losses at December 31, 2008 are attributable to perpetual preferred securities in the
financial sector ($21.7 million carrying value and $10.9 million unrealized loss). These equity
securities have been in an unrealized loss position for less than one year. The unrealized losses
on these securities increased in 2008 due to concerns about the quality of the assets the issuers
hold and uncertainty regarding when these securities will be called. These securities are similar
to fixed maturities as they provide periodic cash flows, contain call features and are similarly
rated and priced like other long-term callable bonds. We have the intent and ability to hold these
investments until a recovery of fair value; therefore we do not consider them to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008.
Regarding our entire portfolio, we monitor the financial condition and operations of the issuers of
securities rated below investment grade and of the issuers of certain investment grade securities
on which we have concerns regarding credit quality. In determining whether or not an unrealized
loss is other than temporary, we review factors such as:
|
|
|
historical operating trends; |
|
|
|
business prospects; |
|
|
|
status of the industry in which the company operates; |
|
|
|
analyst ratings on the issuer and sector; |
|
|
|
quality of management; |
|
|
|
size of the unrealized loss; |
|
|
|
level of current market interest rates compared to market interest rates when the
security was purchased; |
|
|
|
length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position; and |
|
|
|
our intent and ability to hold the security. |
104
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
Our mortgage loan portfolio consists principally of commercial mortgage loans that we have
originated. Our lending policies require that the loans be collateralized by the value of the
related property, establish limits on the amount that can be loaned to one borrower and require
diversification by geographic location and collateral type.
We establish an allowance as needed, consisting of specific reserves, for possible losses against
our mortgage loan portfolio. An allowance is needed for loans in which we do not believe we will
collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the respective loan agreements.
There were no impaired loans requiring a valuation allowance during 2008, 2007 or 2006. At
December 31, 2008, we had one mortgage loan in the process of foreclosure with a current
outstanding principal balance of $9.4 million and property appraised value of $11.1 million.
Components of Net Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
$ |
615,400 |
|
|
$ |
542,669 |
|
|
$ |
463,723 |
|
Fixed maturities trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
78,588 |
|
|
|
68,201 |
|
|
|
58,042 |
|
Investment real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
Policy loans |
|
|
10,931 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
10,415 |
|
Short-term investments, cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,513 |
|
|
|
11,104 |
|
|
|
3,693 |
|
Prepayment fee income and other |
|
|
3,895 |
|
|
|
5,345 |
|
|
|
6,262 |
|
Interest paid on collateral held |
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
|
(4,526 |
) |
|
|
(1,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
715,016 |
|
|
|
634,760 |
|
|
|
542,395 |
|
Less investment expenses |
|
|
(7,144 |
) |
|
|
(6,729 |
) |
|
|
(6,559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
707,872 |
|
|
$ |
628,031 |
|
|
$ |
535,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) Recorded in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
$ |
(155,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,743 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,521 |
) |
Fixed maturities trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
4,128 |
|
|
|
5,794 |
|
|
|
13,492 |
|
Investment real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,645 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Collateral held for securities lending and other transactions |
|
|
(1,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments assumed |
|
|
(2,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and indebtedness of related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
$ |
(156,309 |
) |
|
$ |
5,769 |
|
|
$ |
13,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income on fixed maturity securities classified as trading in 2006 represents unrealized gains
relating to securities held as of December 31, 2006 that were realized upon maturity in 2007.
105
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation of Investments Recorded in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
$ |
(1,399,247 |
) |
|
$ |
(161,626 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,587 |
) |
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
(8,318 |
) |
|
|
(13,451 |
) |
|
|
(13,258 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(2,659 |
) |
|
|
(5,317 |
) |
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation of
investments |
|
$ |
(1,410,224 |
) |
|
$ |
(180,394 |
) |
|
$ |
(101,643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, Maturities and Principal Repayments on Fixed Maturity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Realized |
|
|
Gross Realized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled principal repayments and
calls available for sale |
|
$ |
526,311 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
526,311 |
|
Sales available for sale |
|
|
107,918 |
|
|
|
3,256 |
|
|
|
(5,310 |
) |
|
|
105,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
634,229 |
|
|
$ |
3,256 |
|
|
$ |
(5,310 |
) |
|
$ |
632,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled principal repayments and
calls available for sale |
|
$ |
497,676 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
497,676 |
|
Sales available for sale |
|
|
55,088 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
56,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
552,764 |
|
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
$ |
554,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled principal repayments and
calls available for sale |
|
$ |
393,789 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
393,789 |
|
Sales available for sale |
|
|
59,454 |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
60,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
453,243 |
|
|
$ |
1,226 |
|
|
$ |
(527 |
) |
|
$ |
453,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized losses on sales in 2008 include a $2.3 million loss on a bank and $2.1 million on a
printing and publishing company that experienced significant losses during 2008 and filed for
bankruptcy protection.
Realized losses on fixed maturities totaling $155.3 million in 2008, $4.3 million in 2007 and $2.3
million in 2006 were incurred as a result of writedowns for other-than-temporary impairments on
fixed maturity securities.
Variable Interest Entities
We have investments in variable interest entities for which we are not considered the primary
beneficiary. These investments consist of a real estate limited partnership and certain mezzanine
commercial real estate loans on real estate properties. The real estate limited partnership had
revenues totaling $3.7 million for 2008, $2.7 million for 2007 and $3.2 million for 2006. There
was one real estate project in 2008, two in 2007 and one in 2006. Each real estate project has
assets totaling less than $42.0 million at December 31, 2008, less than $21.0 million at December
31, 2007 and less than $5.0 million at December 31, 2006. Our investments in these real estate
projects were made during the period from 2005 to 2007. Our maximum exposure to loss is the
carrying value of our investments which totaled $12.1 million at December 31, 2008 and $13.2
million at December 31, 2007 for the real estate limited partnership and $2.5 million at December
31, 2008 and $3.6 million at December 31, 2007 for the mezzanine commercial real estate loans.
106
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other
We have a common stock investment in American Equity Investment Life Holding Company (AEL), valued
at $0.4 million at December 31, 2008 and $12.6 million at December 31, 2007. American Equity
underwrites and markets life insurance and annuity products throughout the United States. We sold
a portion of our investment in AEL and realized gains totaling $4.1 million in 2008, $6.1 million
in 2007 and $13.5 million in 2006. We also coinsure a closed block of annuity business from a
subsidiary of AEL.
During 2006, we sold our equity investment in Western Agricultural Insurance Company, an affiliate,
at its fair value of $7.9 million, to Farm Bureau Mutual. A realized gain of $1.9 million was
recognized on this transaction.
At December 31, 2008, affidavits of deposits covering investments with a carrying value totaling
$10,448.1 million were on deposit with state agencies to meet regulatory requirements. Also, fixed
maturity securities with a carrying value of $41.0 million were on deposit with the Federal Home
Loan Bank as collateral for a funding agreement.
At December 31, 2008, there were no commitments to provide additional funding for mortgage loans on
real estate.
Securities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets with a fair value of $66.4 million at
December 31, 2008 and $179.5 million at December 31, 2007 were on loan as part of our securities
lending program. In addition, we were liable for cash collateral under our control from this
program totaling $69.6 million at December 31, 2008 and $185.3 million at December 31, 2007.
We held
cash collateral for derivative and other transactions totaling $10.9 million at December
31, 2008 and $87.9 million at December 31, 2007. These
amounts were invested and included in the consolidated
balance sheets with corresponding amounts netted against call options
in derivative instruments or collateral payable for security lending
and other transactions. No off-balance sheet collateral was held at December 31, 2008 or December 31,
2007.
The carrying value of investments which have been non-income producing for the twelve months
preceding
December 31, 2008 include real estate, fixed income and equity securities totaling $1.2 million.
No investment in any entity or its affiliates (other than bonds issued by agencies of the United
States Government) exceeded ten percent of stockholders equity at December 31, 2008.
3) Derivative Instruments
We have entered into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with a portion of
our flexible premium deferred annuity contracts. Under the interest rate swaps, we pay a fixed
rate of interest and receive a floating rate of interest on a notional amount which totaled $100.0
million at December 31, 2008 and $300.0 million at December 31, 2007. These interest rate swaps
effectively fix the interest crediting rate on a portion of our flexible premium deferred annuity
contract liabilities thereby hedging our exposure to increases in market interest rates. Effective
April 1, 2007, we adopted Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. G26, Cash Flow Hedges: Hedging
Interest Cash Flows on Variable-Rate Assets and Liabilities That Are Not Based on a Benchmark
Interest Rate, which clarified that the only permitted benchmarks are the risk-free rate and rates
based on the LIBOR swap curve. Upon adoption, we were required to undesignate these hedging
relationships and begin recording the net interest rate settlements on the interest rate swaps as a
component of derivative income. The interest rate settlements decreased derivative income $2.5
million in 2008 and increased derivative income $2.9 million in 2007. The interest rate
settlements decreased interest sensitive product benefits $1.0 million in 2007 and $3.7 million in
2006. In 2008, we experienced nonperformance by a counterparty on an interest rate swap agreement
that was originally scheduled to mature on December 1, 2010. We terminated this agreement and
realized a loss totaling $0.5 million.
In 2006, we also entered into one interest rate swap to hedge the variable component of the
interest rate on a portion of our line of credit borrowings. The terms of this swap provide that
we pay a fixed rate of interest and receive a floating rate of interest on a notional amount of
$46.0 million. Any gain or loss on the interest rate swap settlements offset any increase or
decrease in the interest paid on the line of credit, effectively fixing our interest expense
related
107
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
to this portion of the line of credit. Interest expense was increased by $0.5 million in 2008 and
reduced by $0.3 million in 2007 and $0.2 million in 2006 as a result of the net interest
settlements on this swap.
Summary of Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying and Fair Value at December 31, |
|
Maturity |
|
Notional |
|
|
Receive |
|
Pay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
Rate |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
4/1/2008 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
3 month LIBOR* |
|
3.865% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
7/1/2008 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1 month LIBOR* |
|
2.579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 |
|
7/1/2008 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1 month LIBOR* |
|
2.465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
1/1/2010 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1 month LIBOR* |
|
4.858 |
|
|
(1,860 |
) |
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
10/7/2010 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
3 month LIBOR* |
|
4.760 |
|
|
(2,692 |
) |
|
|
(1,159 |
) |
12/1/2010 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1 month LIBOR* |
|
5.040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
6/1/2011 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1 month LIBOR* |
|
5.519 |
|
|
(4,905 |
) |
|
|
(2,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(9,457 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* London Interbank Offered Rate |
We formally documented hedging relationships, including identification of the interest rate swaps
as the hedging instruments and interest credited to the related flexible premium deferred annuity
contract liabilities or interest expense on the line of credit as the hedged transactions. We also
documented our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking these transactions. There
was no ineffectiveness recorded in the consolidated statements of operations during 2008, 2007, or
2006 for instruments designated as hedges.
We write index annuities directly and assume index annuity business under a coinsurance agreement.
Index annuities guarantee the return of principal to the contract holder and credit amounts based
on a percentage of the gain in a specified market index. Most of the premium received is invested
in investment grade fixed income securities and a portion of the premium received from the contract
holder is used to purchase derivatives consisting of one-year or two-year call options on the
applicable market indices to fund the index credits due to the index annuity contract holders. On
the respective anniversary dates of the index annuity contracts, the market index used to compute
the index credits is reset and new call options are purchased to fund the next index credit.
Although the call options are designed to be effective hedges from an economic standpoint, they do
not meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment under Statement No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Therefore, the change in fair value of the options
is recognized in earnings in the period of change. The cost of the options can be managed through
the terms of the index annuities, which permit changes to participation rates, asset fees and/or
caps, subject to guaranteed minimums.
We held call options relating to our direct business, net of collateral received for counterparty
credit risk, with a fair value of $12.9 million at December 31, 2008 and $43.9 million at December
31, 2007. Our share of call options assumed, which is recorded as an embedded derivative in
reinsurance recoverable, totaled $5.6 million at December 31, 2008 and $22.4 million at December
31, 2007. Derivative income (loss) includes ($202.0) million for 2008, ($3.0) million for 2007 and
$70.5 million for 2006 relating to call option proceeds and changes in fair value.
The reserve for index annuity contracts includes a series of embedded derivatives that represent
the contract holders right to participate in index returns over the expected lives of the
applicable contracts. The reserve includes the value of the embedded forward options despite the
fact that call options are not purchased for a period longer than the period of time to the next
index reset date. The change in the value of this embedded derivative is reported on a separate
line in the consolidated statements of operations and totaled ($189.4) million for 2008, ($5.9)
million for 2007 and $70.3 million for 2006.
We have modified coinsurance agreements where interest on funds withheld is determined by reference
to a pool of fixed maturity securities. These arrangements contain embedded derivatives requiring
bifurcation. Embedded derivatives in these contracts are recorded at fair value at each balance
sheet date and changes in the fair values of the derivatives are recorded as derivative income or
loss. The fair value of the embedded derivatives pertaining to funds withheld on variable business
assumed by us totaled ($0.9) million at December 31, 2008 and less than $0.1
million at December 31, 2007 and the fair value of the embedded derivatives pertaining to funds withheld on
business ceded by us
108
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
was $0.3 million at December 31, 2008 and $0.2 million at December 31, 2007.
Derivative income (loss) from our modified coinsurance contracts totaled ($0.8) million in 2008,
$0.1 million in 2007, and less than $0.1 million in 2006.
4) Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Statement No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of
fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the consolidated
balance sheets, for which it is practicable to estimate value. Statement No. 107 excludes certain
financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements and allows
companies to forego the disclosures when those estimates can only be made at excessive cost.
As discussed in Note 1 above, Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the required disclosures about fair
value measurements. Fair value is based on an exit price, which is the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Statement No. 157 also establishes a hierarchal disclosure
framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring
financial instruments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of
factors, including the type of instrument and the characteristics specific to the instrument.
Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be
measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price
observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value. For some investments
little market activity may exist and managements determination of fair value is then based on the
best information available in the circumstances, and may incorporate managements own assumptions
of what a market participant would consider for the fair value, which involves a significant degree
of judgment.
The fixed income markets in 2008 experienced a period of extreme volatility and limited market
liquidity conditions, which affected a broad range of asset classes and sectors. In addition, there
were credit downgrade events and an increased probability of default for many fixed income
instruments. These volatile market conditions increased the difficulty of valuing certain
instruments as trading was less frequent and/or market data was less observable. There were
certain instruments that were in active markets with significant observable data that became
illiquid due to the current financial environment or market conditions. As a result, certain
valuations require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods which are more
complex. These values may not ultimately be realizable in a market transaction, and such values
may change very rapidly as market conditions change and valuation assumptions are modified.
We used the following methods and assumptions in estimating the fair value of our financial
instruments in 2008. Fair values for 2007 used similar methodologies, however there were no
adjustments for credit risk or adverse deviation.
Fixed maturity securities: Fair values of fixed maturity securities are based on quoted market
prices in active markets when available. Investments for which market prices are not observable
are generally private investments, securities valued using non-binding broker quotes or securities
with very little trading activity where reasonable prices from independent sources cannot be
obtained. We have valued our investments, in the absence of observable market prices, using the
valuation methodologies described below applied on a consistent basis.
Equity securities: The fair values for equity securities are based on quoted market prices, where
available. For equity securities that are not actively traded, estimated fair values are based on
values of comparable issues.
Mortgage loans on real estate: Fair values are estimated by discounting expected cash flows of each
loan at an interest rate equal to a spread above the U.S. Treasury bond yield that corresponds to
the loans expected life. These spreads are based on overall market pricing of commercial mortgage
loans at the time of valuation.
Derivative instruments: Fair values for call options and interest rate swaps are based on
counterparty market prices
adjusted for a credit component of the counterparty, net of collateral paid. Prices are verified
using analytical tools by our internal investment professionals.
109
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Policy loans: Fair values are estimated by discounting expected cash flows using a risk-free
interest rate based on the U.S. Treasury curve.
Other long-term investments, cash and short-term investments: Amounts are reported at historical
cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums, depreciation or accrual of discounts, as applicable,
which approximates the fair values due to the nature of these assets.
Reinsurance recoverable: Reinsurance recoverable relating to our portion of the call options used
to fund index credits on the index annuities assumed from a reinsurer is reported at fair value.
Fair value is determined using quoted market prices for the call options, less an adjustment for
credit risk. Reinsurance recoverable also includes the embedded derivatives in our modified
coinsurance contracts under which we cede or assume business. Fair values for these embedded
derivatives are based on the difference between the fair value and the cost basis of the underlying
fixed maturity securities. We are not required to estimate fair value for the remainder of the
reinsurance recoverable balance.
Collateral held and payable for securities lending and other transactions: Fair values are
obtained from an independent pricing source whose results undergo evaluation by our internal
investment professionals.
Assets held in separate accounts: Separate account assets are reported at estimated fair value in
our consolidated balance sheets based on quoted net asset values of the underlying mutual funds.
Future policy benefits and other policyholders funds: Fair values of our liabilities under
contracts not involving significant mortality or morbidity risks (principally deferred annuities,
deposit administration funds, funding agreements and supplementary contracts) are estimated using
one of two methods. For contracts with known maturities, fair value is determined using discounted
cash flow valuation techniques based on current interest rates adjusted to reflect our credit risk
and an additional provision for adverse deviation. For deposit liabilities with no defined
maturities, fair value is the amount payable on demand. We are not required to estimate the fair
value of our liabilities under other insurance contracts.
Short-term and long-term debt: The fair values for long-term debt are estimated using discounted
cash flow analysis based on our current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing
arrangements adjusted, as needed, to reflect our credit risk.
Other liabilities: Fair values for the embedded derivatives in our modified coinsurance contracts
under which we cede or assume business are based on the difference between the fair value and the
cost basis of the underlying fixed maturity securities. Fair values for interest rate swaps are
based on counterparty market prices adjusted for a credit component of the counterparty, net of
collateral paid. Prices are verified using analytical tools by our internal investment
professionals. We are not required to estimate fair value for the remainder of the other
liabilities balances.
Liabilities related to separate accounts: Separate account liabilities are estimated at cash
surrender value, the cost we would incur to extinguish the liability.
110
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair Values and Carrying Values of Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
$ |
9,522,592 |
|
|
$ |
9,522,592 |
|
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
44,863 |
|
|
|
44,863 |
|
|
|
23,633 |
|
|
|
23,633 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
1,335,851 |
|
|
|
1,221,573 |
|
|
|
1,244,718 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
43,918 |
|
|
|
43,918 |
|
Policy loans |
|
|
182,421 |
|
|
|
251,838 |
|
|
|
179,490 |
|
|
|
215,208 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
Cash and short-term investments |
|
|
300,169 |
|
|
|
300,169 |
|
|
|
156,020 |
|
|
|
156,020 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
|
22,659 |
|
|
|
22,659 |
|
Collateral held for securities
lending and other transactions |
|
|
67,953 |
|
|
|
67,953 |
|
|
|
186,925 |
|
|
|
186,925 |
|
Assets held in separate accounts |
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
862,738 |
|
|
|
862,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits |
|
$ |
9,633,590 |
|
|
$ |
8,831,537 |
|
|
$ |
8,666,463 |
|
|
$ |
7,670,795 |
|
Other policyholders funds |
|
|
671,325 |
|
|
|
676,966 |
|
|
|
596,557 |
|
|
|
601,966 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
59,446 |
|
|
|
59,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
371,005 |
|
|
|
248,399 |
|
|
|
316,930 |
|
|
|
273,971 |
|
Collateral payable for securities
lending and other transactions |
|
|
69,656 |
|
|
|
69,656 |
|
|
|
202,594 |
|
|
|
202,594 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
10,314 |
|
|
|
10,314 |
|
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
6,433 |
|
Liabilities related to separate accounts |
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
559,843 |
|
|
|
862,738 |
|
|
|
837,591 |
|
Financial instruments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of
the following categories.
Level 1 Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical financial instruments as of
the reporting date. The types of financial instruments included in Level 1 are listed equities,
mutual funds, money market funds and non-interest bearing cash. As required by Statement No. 157,
we do not adjust the quoted price for these financial instruments, even in situations where we hold
a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level 2 Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets which are either directly
or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined through the use of
models or other valuation methods. Financial instruments which are generally included in this
category include publicly traded issues priced by independent sources, short-term securities, less
liquid and restricted equity securities and over-the-counter derivatives.
Fair values of all Level 2 fixed maturity securities are obtained primarily from a variety of
independent pricing sources, whose results undergo evaluation by our internal investment
professionals. We generally obtain one price per security, which is compared to relevant credit
information, perceived market movements and sector news. Market indices of similar rated asset
class spreads are consulted for valuations and broker indications of similar securities are
compared. If the issuer has had trades in similar debt outstanding but not necessarily the same
rank in the capital structure, spread information is used to support fair value. If discrepancies
are identified additional quotes are obtained and the quote that best reflects a fair value exit
price at the reporting date is selected.
Level 3 Pricing inputs are unobservable for the financial instrument and include situations where
there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument. The inputs into the
determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial
instruments that are included in this category generally include
111
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
private corporate securities, non-binding broker and internally priced mortgage or other assets
backed securities and other publicly traded issues and index annuity embedded derivatives.
Fair values of private investments are determined by reference to public market, private
transactions or valuations for comparable companies or assets in the relevant asset class when such
amounts are available. For other securities where an exit price based on relevant observable
inputs is not obtained from quoted market prices, the fair value is determined by our investment
professionals using an enhanced matrix calculation. The matrix pricing performed by pricing
services and our internal investment professionals includes a discounted cash flow analysis using a
spread, including the specific creditors credit default swap spread (if available), over U.S.
Treasury bond yields, adjusted for the maturity/average life differences. Spread adjustments are
intended to reflect an illiquidity premium and take into account a variety of factors including but
not limited to: senior unsecured versus secured status, par amount outstanding, number of holders,
maturity, average life, composition of lending group and debt rating. These valuation
methodologies involve a significant degree of judgment.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair
value hierarchy. In such cases, a financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is
based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety
requires judgment and considers factors specific to the financial instrument.
Valuation of our Financial Instruments by Fair Value Hierarchy Levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets |
|
|
Significant other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for identical |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets (Level 1) |
|
|
inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,057,826 |
|
|
$ |
907,617 |
|
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
42,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,863 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
1,527 |
|
Cash and short-term investments |
|
|
270,181 |
|
|
|
29,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,169 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
Collateral held for securities
lending and other transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,953 |
|
Assets held in separate accounts |
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits
index annuity embedded
derivatives |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
523,515 |
|
|
$ |
523,515 |
|
Collateral payable for
securities lending and other
transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,656 |
|
Approximately 10.1% of the total fixed maturities are included in the Level 3 group. The fair
value of the assets and liabilities above include the financial instruments nonperformance risk.
Nonperformance risk is the risk that the instrument will not be fulfilled and affects the value at
which the instrument could be transferred in an orderly transaction. The nonperformance risk for
our assets was valued at less than $0.1 million at December 31, 2008. The nonperformance risk for
our liabilities was valued at $236.6 million at December 31, 2008.
112
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Level 3 Fixed Maturity Investments by Valuation Source
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private |
|
|
Publicly traded |
|
|
other asset - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
corporation |
|
|
issues |
|
|
backed securities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Source of valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party vendors |
|
$ |
44,760 |
|
|
$ |
298,852 |
|
|
$ |
40,721 |
|
|
$ |
384,333 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
% |
Priced internally |
|
|
349,302 |
|
|
|
96,896 |
|
|
|
77,086 |
|
|
|
523,284 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
394,062 |
|
|
$ |
395,748 |
|
|
$ |
117,807 |
|
|
$ |
907,617 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Financial Instruments Changes in Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
Other long-term |
|
|
|
available for sale |
|
|
investments |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,072,697 |
|
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
Purchases (disposals), net |
|
|
150,046 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses), net |
|
|
(238,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 (1) |
|
|
(76,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings (amortization) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
907,617 |
|
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains/losses on
investments held at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(193,176 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the transfers in and/or out line above is $270.1 million of securities that
were priced using a broker only quote at December 31, 2007 and were transferred to a
pricing service that uses observable market data in the prices and $193.6 million that were
transferred into Level 3 that did not have enough observable data to include in Level 2 at
December 31, 2008, primarily due to a reduction in market activity. |
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits index product embedded derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
747,511 |
|
Premiums less benefits, net |
|
|
22,432 |
|
Impact of unrealized gains (losses), net |
|
|
(246,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
523,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains/losses on embedded derivatives
held at December 31, 2008 (1) |
|
$ |
(246,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes host accretion and the timing of posting index credits, which are included
with the change in value of index product embedded derivatives in the consolidated
statements of operations. |
5) Reinsurance and Policy Provisions
Reinsurance
In the normal course of business, we seek to limit our exposure to loss on any single insured or
event and to recover a portion of benefits paid by ceding a portion of our exposure to other
insurance enterprises or reinsurers. Our reinsurance coverage for life insurance varies according
to the age and risk classification of the insured with retention limits ranging up to $1.1 million
of coverage per individual life. New sales of certain term life products are reinsured on a first
dollar quota share basis. We do not use financial or surplus relief reinsurance.
113
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
We participate in a reinsurance pool with various unaffiliated life insurance companies to mitigate
the impact of a catastrophic event on our financial position and results of operations. Members of
the pool share in the eligible catastrophic losses based on their size and contribution to the
pool. Under the pool arrangement, we will be able to cede approximately 64% of catastrophic losses
after other reinsurance and a deductible of $0.9 million. Pool losses are capped at $17.8 million
per event and the maximum loss we could incur as a result of losses assumed from other pool members
is $6.4 million per event.
Farm Bureau Life also has an annual 100% quota share accidental death reinsurance agreement.
Coverage includes all acts of terrorism including those of a nuclear, chemical or biological
origin. Coverage is subject to an annual aggregate retention and was increased from $10.0 million
to $11.0 million effective January 1, 2009. A maximum occurrence limit of $50.0 million applies to
policies written on agents of the company who are participating in company-sponsored incentive
trips. All other occurrence catastrophes are unlimited in amount.
In addition to the cession of risks described above, we also have reinsurance agreements with
variable alliance partners to cede a specified percentage of risks associated with variable
universal life and variable annuity contracts. Under these agreements, we pay the alliance
partners their reinsurance percentage of charges and deductions collected on the reinsured polices.
The alliance partners in return pay us their reinsurance percentage of benefits in excess of
related account balances. In addition, the alliance partners pay us an expense allowance for
certain new business, development and maintenance costs on the reinsured contracts.
Life insurance in force ceded on a consolidated basis totaled $9,144.2 million (21.0% of direct
life insurance in force) at December 31, 2008 and $8,482.8 million (20.6% of direct life insurance
in force) at December 31, 2007.
Insurance premiums and product charges have been reduced by $31.8 million in 2008, $30.8 million in
2007 and $30.7 million in 2006 and insurance benefits have been reduced by $19.1 million in 2008,
$13.7 million in 2007 and $21.2 million in 2006 as a result of cession agreements.
Reinsurance contracts do not relieve us of our obligations to policyholders. To the extent that
reinsuring companies are later unable to meet obligations under reinsurance agreements, our
insurance subsidiaries would be liable for these obligations, and payment of these obligations
could result in losses. To limit the possibility of such losses, we evaluate the financial
condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentrations of credit risk. No allowance for
uncollectible amounts has been established against our asset for reinsurance recoverable since none
of our receivables are deemed to be uncollectible.
We have assumed closed blocks of certain traditional life, universal life and annuity business
through coinsurance agreements. In addition, we assume variable annuity and variable life business
from alliance partners through modified coinsurance arrangements.
Life insurance in force assumed on a consolidated basis totaled $1,503.8 million (4.2% of total
life insurance in force) at December 31, 2008 and $1,573.7 million (4.6% of total life insurance in
force) at December 31, 2007. Premiums and product charges assumed totaled $22.1 million in 2008,
$24.5 million in 2007 and $26.0 million in 2006. Insurance benefits assumed totaled $12.4 million
in 2008, $9.7 million in 2007 and $10.9 million in 2006.
114
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Policy
Provisions
Analysis of the Value of Insurance In Force Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Excluding impact of net unrealized investment gains
and losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
40,591 |
|
|
$ |
45,660 |
|
|
$ |
49,118 |
|
Accretion of interest during the year |
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
Amortization of asset |
|
|
(4,367 |
) |
|
|
(6,888 |
) |
|
|
(9,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance prior to impact of net unrealized
investment gains and losses |
|
|
37,886 |
|
|
|
40,591 |
|
|
|
45,660 |
|
Impact of net unrealized investment gains and losses |
|
|
25,235 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
(2,819 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
63,121 |
|
|
$ |
41,215 |
|
|
$ |
42,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of the value of insurance in force acquired, based on expected future gross
profits/margins, for the next five years and thereafter is expected to be as follows: 2009 $2.7
million; 2010 $2.7 million; 2011 $2.6 million; 2012 $2.4 million; 2013 $2.2 million; and
thereafter, through 2030 $25.3 million.
Certain variable annuity and variable universal life contracts in our separate accounts have
minimum interest guarantees on funds deposited in our general account and guaranteed minimum death
benefits (GMDBs) on our variable annuities. In addition, we have certain variable annuity
contracts that have an incremental death benefit (IDB) rider that pays a percentage of the gain on
the contract upon death of the contract holder. Beginning in 2008, we also have certain variable
annuity contracts that have a guaranteed minimum income benefit (GMIB) that provides monthly income
to the contract holder after the eighth policy year.
GMDB, IDB and GMIB Net Amount at Risk by Type of Guarantee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Separate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account |
|
|
Net Amount |
|
|
Account |
|
|
Net Amount |
|
Type of Guarantee |
|
Balance |
|
|
at Risk |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
at Risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed minimum death benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return of net deposits |
|
$ |
144,119 |
|
|
$ |
19,626 |
|
|
$ |
241,716 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
Return the greater of highest anniversary
value or net deposits |
|
|
265,105 |
|
|
|
126,169 |
|
|
|
478,694 |
|
|
|
6,925 |
|
Incremental death benefit |
|
|
224,999 |
|
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
|
442,323 |
|
|
|
42,015 |
|
Guaranteed minimum income benefit |
|
|
5,568 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
152,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The separate account assets are principally comprised of stock and bond mutual funds. The net
amount at risk for these contracts is based on the amount by which GMDB, IDB or GMIB exceeds
account value. The reserve for GMDBs, IDBs, or GMIBs determined using modeling techniques and
industry mortality assumptions, that is included in future policy benefits, totaled $1.4 million at
December 31, 2008 and $1.2 million at December 31, 2007. The weighted average age of the contract
holders with GMDB, IDB or GMIB rider exposure was 53 years at December 31, 2008 and 54 years at
December 31, 2007. Paid benefits for GMDBs, IDBs and GMIBs totaled $0.4 million for 2008, $0.1
million for 2007 and less than $0.1 million for 2006.
6) Income Taxes
We file a consolidated federal income tax return with the Life Companies and FBL Financial
Services, Inc. and certain of their subsidiaries. The companies included in the consolidated
federal income tax return each report
115
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
current income tax expense as allocated under a consolidated tax allocation agreement. Generally,
this allocation results in profitable companies recognizing a tax provision as if the individual
company filed a separate return and loss companies recognizing a benefit to the extent their losses
contribute to reduce consolidated taxes.
Deferred income taxes have been established based upon the temporary differences between the
financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities. The reversal of the temporary
differences will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the related asset or
liability is recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not
that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance we
considered the scheduled reversal of deferred tax assets, projected future taxable income, taxable
income from prior years available for recovery and tax planning strategies. Our tax planning
strategies assume deferred tax assets related to unrealized losses on our investments are temporary
as we have the intent and ability to hold the investments until maturity, at which time, the
existing temporary difference is expected to reverse. As such, we have determined that the
establishment of a valuation allowance was not necessary at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Income Tax Expenses (Credits)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Taxes provided in consolidated statements of operations
on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest in loss
(earnings) of subsidiaries and equity income
(loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
(11,086 |
) |
|
$ |
40,530 |
|
|
$ |
40,993 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(2,576 |
) |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,662 |
) |
|
|
41,051 |
|
|
|
44,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (loss) current |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes provided in consolidated statements of changes in
stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cumulative effect of change in accounting
principal deferred |
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized investment gains/losses
deferred |
|
|
(330,308 |
) |
|
|
(34,742 |
) |
|
|
(29,022 |
) |
Adjustment resulting from capital transaction of
equity investee deferred |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Change in underfunded status of other post-retirement
benefit plans deferred |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
Issuance of shares under stock option plan current |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(1,376 |
) |
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
Issuance of shares under stock option plan deferred |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330,825 |
) |
|
|
(36,089 |
) |
|
|
(30,757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(344,489 |
) |
|
$ |
5,789 |
|
|
$ |
14,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Effective Tax Rate Reconciliation to Federal Income Tax Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes, minority
interest in loss (earnings) of subsidiaries and
equity income (loss) |
|
$ |
(31,879 |
) |
|
$ |
125,806 |
|
|
$ |
133,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) at federal statutory rate (35%) |
|
$ |
(11,158 |
) |
|
$ |
44,032 |
|
|
$ |
46,721 |
|
Tax effect (decrease) of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt dividend and interest income |
|
|
(2,618 |
) |
|
|
(2,700 |
) |
|
|
(1,963 |
) |
Reversal of tax accruals no longer necessary
based on events and analysis performed
during
the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
Other items |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
(13,662 |
) |
|
$ |
41,051 |
|
|
$ |
44,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Effect of Temporary Differences Giving Rise to Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Deferred income tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity and equity securities |
|
|
585,456 |
|
|
|
46,481 |
|
Future policy benefits |
|
|
306,651 |
|
|
|
342,244 |
|
Accrued dividends |
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
3,923 |
|
Accrued benefit and compensation costs |
|
|
11,378 |
|
|
|
12,469 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
909,514 |
|
|
|
407,853 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
$ |
425,817 |
|
|
$ |
298,703 |
|
Deferred sales inducements |
|
|
147,059 |
|
|
|
112,452 |
|
Value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
22,092 |
|
|
|
14,425 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
5,407 |
|
|
|
9,162 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,059 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,434 |
|
|
|
436,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset (liability) |
|
$ |
305,080 |
|
|
$ |
(28,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and
penalties in other expenses. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax
examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001.
7) Credit Arrangements
We have a $60.0 million revolving line of credit agreement with Bank of America National
Association (formerly LaSalle Bank National Association) and Bankers Trust Company, N.A. This
agreement is effective through October 31, 2010 and interest on any borrowings accrues at a
variable rate (5.00% at December 31, 2008 and 5.99% at December 31, 2007). Debt outstanding on
this line of credit totaled $60.0 million at December 31, 2008 and $46.0 million at December 31,
2007.
Under the bank line of credit agreement, we are required to meet financial covenants, which include
compliance with certain financial ratios and maintaining certain rating agency levels. In
addition, we are prohibited from incurring additional indebtedness in excess of $10.0 million
without prior approval from the banks while this line of credit is in
effect. We are compliant with all terms of the line of credit
agreement at December 31, 2008. We intend to pay off the
borrowings in the first quarter of 2009 with funds readily available
at the parent company to increase our access to liquidity with the
Federal Home Loan Bank. Therefore we have classified the outstanding
amount as short-term debt on our consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2008.
117
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In November 2008, we issued 9.25% Senior Notes payable to affiliates totaling $100.0 million that
mature in November 2011 (2011 Senior Notes). One note for $75.0 million was issued to Farm Bureau
Mutual and a $25.0 million note was issued to an investment affiliate of the Iowa Farm Bureau
Federation (IFBF), our majority stockholder. Interest is payable quarterly on March 31, June 30,
September 30 and December 31 of each year. The 2011 Senior Notes, which are prepayable at par,
would have caused us to violate the covenants of our revolving line of credit agreement with Bank
of America National Association and Bankers Trust Company, N.A. Therefore, in November 2008, the
line of credit agreement was amended to allow for the 2011 Senior Notes without violating the
financial covenants.
In March 2007, we issued $100.0 million of 5.875% Senior Notes due March 15, 2017 (2017 Senior
Notes). Interest on the 2017 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15
each year. The 2017 Senior Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at any time at our option at a
make-whole redemption price equal to the greater of 100% of their principal amount or the sum of
the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest, discounted to the
redemption date on a semiannual basis at the treasury rate plus 20 basis points. We received net
proceeds of approximately $98.5 million from the issuance of the 2017 Senior Notes after
underwriting fees, offering expenses and original issue discount, which are being amortized over
the term of the 2017 Senior Notes, using the effective interest method. We amended our line of
credit agreement with Bank of America National Association and Bankers Trust Company, N.A in 2007
to allow for the 2017 Senior Notes without violating the financial covenants of that agreement.
In April 2004, we issued $75.0 million of 5.85% Senior Notes due April 15, 2014 (2014 Senior
Notes). Interest on the Senior Notes due 2014 is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15
each year. The 2014 Senior Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at any time at our option at a
make-whole redemption price equal to the greater of 100% of their principal amount or the sum of
the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest, discounted to the
redemption date on a semiannual basis at the treasury rate plus 25 basis points. We received net
proceeds of approximately $75.5 million from the issuance of the 2014 Senior Notes after
underwriting fees, offering expenses, original issue discount and the impact of a rate lock, which
are being amortized over the term of the 2014 Senior Notes, using the effective interest method.
We amended our line of credit agreement with Bank of America National Association and Bankers Trust
Company, N.A in 2004 to allow for the 2014 Senior Notes without violating the financial covenants
of that agreement.
Long-term debt includes $97.0 million of our subordinated debt obligation to FBL Financial Group
Capital Trust (the Trust). We issued 5% Subordinated Deferrable Interest Notes, due June 30, 2047
(the Notes) with a principal amount of $100.0 million to support $97.0 million of 5% Preferred
Securities issued by the Trust. We also have a $3.0 million equity investment in the Trust, which
is netted against the Notes on the consolidated balance sheets due to a contractual right of
setoff. The sole assets of the Trust are and will be the Notes and any interest accrued thereon.
The interest payment dates on the Notes correspond to the distribution dates on the 5% Preferred
Securities. The 5% Preferred Securities, which have a liquidation value of $1,000.00 per share
plus accrued and unpaid distributions, mature simultaneously with the Notes and are owned by AEL.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, 97,000 shares of 5% Preferred Securities were outstanding, all of
which we unconditionally guarantee.
8) Stockholders Equity
The IFBF owns our Series B preferred stock. Each share of Series B preferred stock has a
liquidation preference of $0.60 and voting rights identical to that of Class A common stock with
the exception that each Series B share is entitled to two votes while each Class A share is
entitled to one vote. The Series B preferred stock pays cumulative annual cash dividends of $0.03
per share, payable quarterly, and is redeemable by us, at our option, at $0.60 per share plus
unpaid dividends if the stock ceases to be beneficially owned by a Farm Bureau organization.
118
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Holders of the Class A common stock and Series B preferred stock vote together as a group in the
election of Class A Directors (eight to ten). The Class B common stock votes as a separate class
to elect the Class B Directors (five to seven). Voting for the Directors is noncumulative. In
addition, various ownership aspects of our Class B common stock are governed by a Class B
Shareholder Agreement resulting in the IFBF, which owns 65% of our voting stock as of December 31,
2008, maintaining control of the Company. Holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock
receive equal per-share common stock dividends.
9) Retirement and Compensation Plans
Defined Benefit Plans
We participate with several affiliates and an unaffiliated organization in various multiemployer
defined benefit plans. These plans cover substantially all our employees and the employees of the
other participating companies who have attained age 21 and one year of service. Benefits are based
on years of service and the employees compensation. One of these plans provides supplemental
pension benefits to employees with salaries and/or pension benefits in excess of the qualified plan
limits imposed by federal tax law. Net periodic pension cost of the plans is allocated between
participants generally on a basis of time incurred by the respective employees for each employer.
Such allocations are reviewed annually.
As multiemployer plans, the assets we contribute to the plans are commingled with the assets
contributed by the other employers. Accordingly, unless noted otherwise, we do not separate the
disclosure information below between amounts attributable to us and amounts attributable to the
other employers. For 2008, the measurement date for the plans is December 31. Prior to 2008, the
measurement date for the plans was September 30. This change was required due to the adoption of
FASB Statement No. 158 as discussed in Note 1, Significant Accounting Policies Accounting
Changes.
Plans Funded Status for all Employers Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Change in benefit obligation all employers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net benefit obligation at beginning of the year |
|
$ |
260,738 |
|
|
$ |
261,289 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
8,291 |
|
|
|
9,364 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
18,534 |
|
|
|
13,903 |
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
12,787 |
|
|
|
(3,446 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
|
(22,465 |
) |
|
|
(20,564 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2,244 |
) |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net benefit obligation at end of the year |
|
|
275,641 |
|
|
|
260,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets all employers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the year |
|
|
207,456 |
|
|
|
182,452 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
(25,327 |
) |
|
|
13,515 |
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
16,372 |
|
|
|
32,053 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(22,465 |
) |
|
|
(20,564 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(3,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of the year |
|
|
172,708 |
|
|
|
207,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underfunded status at end of the year |
|
$ |
(102,933 |
) |
|
$ |
(53,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement No. 158 does not require the recognition of an asset or liability in the consolidated
balance sheets for the funded status of multiemployer plans. Under Statement No. 158, a liability
totaling $102.9 million at December 31, 2008 and $53.3 million at December 31, 2007 would have been
recorded for all employers for the underfunded status of the plans.
119
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost for all Employers Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
6,636 |
|
|
$ |
9,364 |
|
|
$ |
9,583 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
14,835 |
|
|
|
13,903 |
|
|
|
13,711 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(13,978 |
) |
|
|
(12,347 |
) |
|
|
(10,984 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
4,479 |
|
|
|
5,593 |
|
Settlement expense |
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost all employers |
|
$ |
13,532 |
|
|
$ |
16,174 |
|
|
$ |
18,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plans prior service costs are amortized using a straight-line amortization method over the
average remaining service period of the employees. For actuarial gains and losses, we use a
corridor, as allowed under Statement No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions, to determine the
amounts to amortize. It is expected that net periodic pension cost for all employers in 2009 will
include $8.9 million for amortization of the actuarial loss and $0.7 million of prior service cost
amortization.
We expect contributions to the plans for 2009 for all employers to be approximately $21.3 million,
of which $9.0 million is expected to be contributed by us. Expected benefits to be paid for all
employers are as follows: 2009 $26.6 million, 2010 $23.3 million, 2011 $21.5 million, 2012 -
$23.2 million, 2013 $23.3 million and 2014 through 2018 $107.4 million.
FBLs Proportionate Share of Prepaid or Accrued Pension Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts recognized in our consolidated financial statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid benefit cost |
|
$ |
13,140 |
|
|
$ |
14,342 |
|
Accrued benefit cost |
|
|
(10,241 |
) |
|
|
(10,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in our consolidated financial statements |
|
$ |
2,899 |
|
|
$ |
3,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost recorded in our consolidated income statements totaled $5.4 million in
2008, $5.9 million in 2007 and $6.4 million in 2006. As mentioned in Note 1 above, in 2008 we also
recorded a portion of the net periodic pension costs as a charge to retained earnings totaling $0.8
million as a result of adopting the measurement date portion of Statement No. 158.
Information for Pension Plans with Accumulated Benefit Obligations in Excess of Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Projected benefit obligation all employers |
|
$ |
275,641 |
|
|
$ |
260,738 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation all employers |
|
|
243,358 |
|
|
|
228,574 |
|
Fair value of plan assets all employers |
|
|
172,708 |
|
|
|
207,456 |
|
Weighted Average Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.93% |
|
|
|
6.01% |
|
Annual salary increases |
|
|
4.00% |
|
|
|
4.00% |
|
We estimate the discount rate by projecting and discounting future benefit payments inherent in the
projected benefit obligation using a spot yield curve known as the Citigroup Pension Discount
Liability Index yield curve. This curve is constructed from the Treasury curve by adding
option-adjusted spreads that are drawn from the double-A
120
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
corporate sector of the Salomon Broad
Investment-Grade Bond Index. The bonds with excessive call exposure are excluded, as well as
securities with abnormal option-adjusted spreads. The final spreads are determined using this
call-protected sample of AA corporate bonds.
Weighted Average Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Pension Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Discount rate |
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
Annual salary increases |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
We employ a long-term investment strategy of diversifying the plans assets into equity securities
with the long-term target allocation being approximately 60% deposit administration fund contracts
and 40% equities. At December 31, 2008, the plans assets were invested 77% in deposit
administration fund contracts held by Farm Bureau Life and 23% in diversified equities. Our
investment strategy is to (1) achieve a long-term return sufficient to satisfy all plan
obligations, (2) assume a prudent level of risk and (3) to maintain adequate liquidity. The
expected return on plan assets is set at the long-term rate expected to be earned based on the long
term investment strategy of the plans. In estimating the expected rate of return for each asset
class, we take into account factors such as historical rates of return, expected future risk free
rates of return and anticipated returns expected given the risk profile of each asset class.
Other Retirement Plans
We participate with several affiliates in a 401(k) defined contribution plan which covers
substantially all employees. Through October 2008, we contributed FBL Financial Group, Inc. stock
in an amount equal to 100% of an employees contributions up to 2% of the annual salary contributed
by the employee and an amount equal to 50% of an employees contributions between 2% and 4% of the
annual salary contributed by the employee. Beginning in November 2008, we made cash contributions
at the same contribution levels noted above. Costs are allocated among the affiliates on a basis
of time incurred by the respective employees for each company. Expense related to the plan totaled
$1.1 million in 2008, $1.0 million in 2007 and $0.9 million in 2006.
We have established deferred compensation plans for certain key current and former employees and
have certain other benefit plans which provide for retirement and other benefits. Liabilities for
these plans are accrued as the related benefits are earned.
Certain of the assets related to these plans are on deposit with us and amounts relating to these
plans are included in our financial statements. In addition, certain amounts included in the
policy liabilities for interest sensitive products relate to deposit administration funds
maintained by us on behalf of affiliates.
In addition to benefits offered under the aforementioned benefit plans, we and several other
affiliates sponsor a plan that provides group term life insurance benefits to retirees who have
worked full-time for ten years and attained age 55 while in service. Postretirement benefit
expense for this plan is allocated in a manner consistent with pension expense discussed above. We
also have two single employer plans that provide health and medical benefits to retirees.
Postretirement benefit expense aggregated $0.1 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006. In addition, with
the adoption of Statement No. 158 in 2006, we increased other liabilities $0.3 million for the
underfunded status of these plans, reduced accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) $0.2
million and recorded a deferred tax asset of $0.1 million.
Stock Compensation Plans
We have two share-based payment arrangements under our Class A Common Stock Compensation Plan,
which are described below. Compensation expense for these arrangements totaled $1.0 million for
2008, $4.9 million for 2007 and $3.1 million for 2006. The income tax benefit (expense) recognized
in the income statement for these arrangements totaled ($0.3) million for 2008, $1.8 million for
2007 and $1.1 million for 2006.
121
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Option Awards
We grant stock options for Class A common stock to directors, officers and employees. For officers
and employees, the options have a contractual term of 10 years and generally vest over a period up
to five years, contingent upon continued employment with us. Options to directors are fully vested
upon grant and have a contractual term that varies with the length of time the director remains on
the Board, up to ten years. The stock price for all options is equal to the fair value of the
common stock on the grant date. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of
grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. Beginning in 2009, stock based
compensation for our directors will be in the form of grants of stock or restricted stock.
Assumptions Used in our Valuation Model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Weighted average risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
4.73 |
% |
|
|
4.33 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
1.40 |
% |
Weighted average volatility factor of
the expected market price |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
Weighted average expected term |
|
|
5.3 |
years |
|
|
5.7 |
years |
|
|
5.6 |
years |
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant. We use the historical realized volatility of our stock for the expected volatility
assumption within the valuation model. For options granted in 2008, the weighted average expected
term for the majority of our options was calculated using average historical behavior. For options
granted in 2007 and earlier, the weighted-average expected term for the majority of our options was
presumed to be the mid-point between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term, also
known as the shortcut method under Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
Stock Option Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
Term (in |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price per Share |
|
|
Years) |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Shares under option at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
2,260,597 |
|
|
$ |
27.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
511,208 |
|
|
|
32.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(54,915 |
) |
|
|
20.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(54,465 |
) |
|
|
27.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares under option at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,662,425 |
|
|
|
28.68 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at December 31, 2008 or expected
to vest in the future |
|
|
2,608,351 |
|
|
$ |
28.60 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable options at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,766,896 |
|
|
$ |
26.52 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the difference between the stock price and exercise price for each option,
excluding options where the exercise price is above the stock price, at December 31, 2008. |
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted per common share was $7.82 for 2008,
$9.27 for 2007 and $8.64 for 2006. The intrinsic value of options exercised during the year
totaled $0.6 million for 2008, $5.4 million for 2007 and $6.9 million for 2006.
Unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested share-based compensation granted under the
stock option arrangement totaled $3.2 million as of December 31, 2008. This expense is expected to
be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years.
122
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
We issue new shares to satisfy stock option exercises. We do not have a policy of repurchasing
shares on the open market to satisfy share-based payment arrangements. Cash received from stock
options exercised totaled $1.0 million for 2008, $5.9 million for 2007 and $6.6 million for 2006.
The actual tax benefit realized from stock options exercised totaled $0.1 million for 2008, $1.6
million for 2007 and $2.0 million for 2006.
Performance Based Restricted Stock
We also grant restricted Class A common shares to certain executives. The restrictions on this
stock lapse and the stock vests if we meet or exceed operating goals, such as earnings per share
and return on equity targets within or during a three year period. Depending on performance, the
actual amount of shares issued could range from zero to 100% of the granted amount. The value of
the awards is based on the grant date fair value of the restricted stock adjusted for expected
forfeitures and an estimate of the number of shares expected to vest. The estimate for the number
of shares to vest is reviewed each period and the impact of any changes in the estimate on expense
is recorded in the current period. These awards are charged to expense using the straight-line
method over the required service period. Dividends on the restricted stock during the restriction
period are contingent upon vesting.
Restricted Stock Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
per Share |
|
Restricted stock at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
256,541 |
|
|
$ |
34.99 |
|
Granted |
|
|
145,722 |
|
|
|
31.37 |
|
Released |
|
|
(28,915 |
) |
|
|
27.18 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(42,402 |
) |
|
|
32.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
330,946 |
|
|
|
34.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based compensation granted under the
restricted stock arrangement totaled less than $0.1 million as of December 31, 2008. This expense
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years. The tax benefit realized
from restricted stock released to employees was $0.3 million as of December 31, 2008. We have a
policy of withholding shares to cover estimated future tax payments.
At December 31, 2008, shares of Class A common stock available for grant as additional awards under
the Class A Common Stock Compensation Plan totaled 3,788,923.
Other
We have a Director Compensation Plan under which non-employee directors on our Board may elect to
receive a portion of their compensation in the form of cash, Class A common shares or deferred
stock units. Under this plan, we have deferred stock units outstanding totaling 60,825 at December
31, 2008 and 46,846 at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2008, shares of Class A common stock
available for future issuance under the Director Compensation Plan totaled 35,250. We also have an
Executive Salary and Bonus Deferred Compensation Plan under which officers of the Company who are
required to meet certain stated common stock ownership guidelines are allowed to use their base
salary and annual cash bonus to purchase deferred stock units. Under this plan, we have deferred
stock units outstanding totaling 31,843 at December 31, 2008 and 19,600 at December 31, 2007. At
December 31, 2008, shares of Class A common stock available for future issuance under this plan
totaled 217,094. We also have an Executive Excess 401k Plan under which officers of the Company who
meet salary guidelines and
401k contribution guidelines are allowed to purchase unregistered deferred stock units. Under this
plan, we have deferred stock units outstanding totaling 5,769 at December 31, 2008.
10) Management and Other Agreements
We share certain office facilities and services with the IFBF and its affiliated companies. These
expenses are allocated on the basis of cost and time studies that are updated annually and consist
primarily of rent, salaries and
123
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
related expenses, travel and other operating costs. In 2008, we also entered into an expense
allocation agreement with Farm Bureau Mutual for the use of property and equipment.
We have management agreements with Farm Bureau Mutual and other affiliates under which we provide
general business, administrative and management services. Fee income for these services totaled
$3.5 million in 2008, $3.1 million in 2007 and $2.6 million in 2006. In addition, Farm Bureau
Management Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the IFBF, provides certain management services
to us under a separate arrangement. We incurred related expenses totaling $0.5 million in 2008,
$1.0 million in 2007 and $1.1 million in 2006.
We have marketing agreements with the Farm Bureau property-casualty companies operating within our
marketing territory, including Farm Bureau Mutual and another affiliate. Under the marketing
agreements, the property-casualty companies are responsible for development and management of our
agency force for a fee. We incurred expense totaling $8.5 million in 2008, $7.6 million in 2007
and $7.2 million in 2006 relating to these arrangements.
We are licensed by the IFBF to use the Farm Bureau and FB designations in Iowa. In connection
with this license, we incurred royalty expense totaling $0.5 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006. We
have similar arrangements with the Kansas Farm Bureau and other state Farm Bureau organizations in
our market territory. Total royalty expense to Farm Bureau organizations other than the IFBF
totaled $1.4 million in 2008, $1.3 million in 2007 and $1.2 million in 2006.
11) Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, we may be involved in litigation where amounts are alleged that
are substantially in excess of contractual policy benefits or certain other agreements. At
December 31, 2008, management is not aware of any claims for which a material loss is reasonably
possible.
In the third quarter of 2008, the jury from a trial in Federal District Court in Utah involving an
agency matter awarded Farm Bureau Life and Farm Bureau Mutual actual damages totaling $3.6 million
and punitive damages totaling $62.7 million. Approximately 25% of the award is allocable to Farm
Bureau Life with the remaining 75% allocable to Farm Bureau Mutual. In February 2009 the court
ruled on various post trial motions, upholding the actual damages, but reducing the punitive
damages to $3.6 million. The time for appealing the verdict and award will not begin until post
trial motions have been filed and ruled on by the court. Regardless of the outcome of any rulings,
we anticipate an appeal by the defendants unless a settlement has been reached. In addition, see
Note 1, Significant Accounting Policies Underwriting, Acquisition and Insurance Expenses for
disclosure of a $4.9 million gain contingency relating to a lawsuit settlement in 2006. Recoveries
from third parties are required to be accounted for as gain contingencies and not recorded in our
financial statements until the lawsuit is resolved.
We self-insure our employee health and dental claims. However, claims in excess of our
self-insurance limits are fully insured. We fund insurance claims through a self-insurance trust.
Deposits to the trust are made at an amount equal to our best estimate of claims incurred during
the period. Accordingly, no accruals are recorded on our financial statements for unpaid claims
and claims incurred but not reported. Adjustments, if any, resulting in changes in the estimate of
claims incurred will be reflected in operations in the periods in which such adjustments are known.
We lease our home office properties under a 15-year operating lease from a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the IFBF. Future remaining minimum lease payments under this lease, as of December 31, 2008,
are as follows: 2009 $2.7 million; 2010 $2.7 million; 2011 $2.7 million; 2012 $2.7 million
and 2013 $0.7 million. Rent expense for the lease totaled $3.4 million in 2008, $3.1 million in
2007 and $3.0 million in 2006. These amounts are net of $1.4 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006 in
amortization of a deferred gain on the exchange of our home office properties for common stock in
1998. The remaining unamortized deferred gain totaled $5.9 million at December 31, 2008 and $7.3
million at December 31, 2007.
From time to time, assessments are levied on our insurance subsidiaries by guaranty associations in
most states in which the subsidiaries are licensed. These assessments, which are accrued for, are
to cover losses of policyholders of insolvent or rehabilitated companies. In some states, these
assessments can be partially recovered through a
124
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
reduction in future premium taxes. Expenses incurred for guaranty fund assessments, net of related
premium tax offsets, totaled less than $0.1 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006.
12) Earnings (Loss) per Share
Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18,149 |
) |
|
$ |
86,339 |
|
|
$ |
90,129 |
|
Dividends on Series B preferred stock |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for earnings (loss) per common share
income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(18,299 |
) |
|
$ |
86,189 |
|
|
$ |
89,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
29,815,654 |
|
|
|
29,653,470 |
|
|
|
29,332,661 |
|
Deferred common stock units relating to deferred compensation
plans |
|
|
78,255 |
|
|
|
60,792 |
|
|
|
46,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for earnings (loss) per common share
weighted-average shares |
|
|
29,893,909 |
|
|
|
29,714,262 |
|
|
|
29,379,365 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
607,355 |
|
|
|
525,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per common share
adjusted weighted-average
shares |
|
|
29,893,909 |
|
|
|
30,321,617 |
|
|
|
29,904,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share assuming dilution |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
2.84 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase outstanding shares of common stock are excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings (loss) per share if the options are antidilutive.
Outstanding Shares Excluded from Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Number of shares excluded |
|
2,141,609 |
|
592,768 |
|
325,434 |
Range of option price per share |
|
$20.00 -$40.85 |
|
$31.43 to $40.85 |
|
$25.60 to $39.48 |
Year through which options expire |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
13) Statutory Information
Statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by regulatory authorities for the Companys
insurance subsidiaries differ from GAAP. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC) has issued model laws and regulations, many of which have been adopted by state insurance
regulators. However, states have the right to prescribe practices that differ from those issued by
the NAIC and, the Commissioner of Insurance has the right to permit other specific practices that
deviate from prescribed practices.
The financial statements of the Life Companies included herein differ from related statutory-basis
financial statements principally as follows: (a) the bond portfolio is classified as
available-for-sale and carried at fair value rather than generally being carried at amortized cost;
(b) beginning in 2008, call options that provide an economic hedge for the growth in interest
credited to an index annuity policy are accounted at fair value rather than at amortized cost; (c)
acquisition costs of acquiring new business are deferred and amortized over the life of the
policies rather than charged to operations as incurred; (d) future policy benefit reserves for
participating traditional life insurance products are based on net level premium methods and
guaranteed cash value assumptions which may
125
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
differ from statutory reserves; (e) future policy benefit reserves on certain interest sensitive
products are based on full account values, rather than discounting methodologies utilizing
statutory interest rates; (f) net realized gains or losses attributed to changes in the level of
market interest rates are recognized as gains or losses in the statements of operations when the
sale is completed rather than deferred and amortized over the remaining life of the fixed maturity
security or mortgage loan; (g) the established formula-determined statutory investment reserve,
changes in which are charged directly to surplus, is not recorded as a liability; (h) certain
deferred income tax assets, agents balances and certain other assets designated as nonadmitted
assets for statutory purposes are reported as assets rather than being charged to surplus; (i)
revenues for interest sensitive, indexed and variable products consist of policy charges for the
cost of insurance, policy administration charges, amortization of policy initiation fees and
surrender charges assessed rather than premiums received; (j) pension income or expense is
recognized for all employees in accordance with Statement No. 87, rather than for vested employees
only; (k) the financial statements of subsidiaries are consolidated with those of the insurance
subsidiary rather than being accounted for under the equity method, and (l) assets and liabilities
are restated to fair values when a change in ownership occurs that is accounted for as a purchase,
with provisions for goodwill and other intangible assets, rather than continuing to be presented at
historical cost.
Net income (loss) of the Life Companies, as determined in accordance with statutory accounting
practices prescribed or permitted by regulatory authorities, was ($145.6) million in 2008, $77.4
million in 2007 and $73.8 million in 2006. Statutory net gain from operations, which excludes the
impact of realized capital gains and losses on investments, totaled $1.1 million in 2008, $76.9
million in 2006 and $63.3 million in 2006. Statutory capital and surplus totaled $802.3 million at
December 31, 2008 and $756.6 million at December 31, 2007.
Effective December 31, 2008, we adopted a prescribed practice issued by the Insurance Division,
Department of Commerce, of the State of Iowa, which changed the accounting for derivative
instruments hedging fixed index annuities and reserves for index annuities. These changes improve
the accounting relationship between the call option asset and statutory reserve, providing a more
fair representation of our capital position. We also adopted a permitted practice, which increased
the amount of deferred tax assets that may be admitted on the statutory financial statements at
December 31, 2008. The statutory capital and surplus for the Life Companies at December 31, 2008
reported above is approximately $82.1 million higher than it would have been without these
practices.
State laws specify regulatory actions if an insurers risk-based capital (RBC), a measure of an
solvency, falls below certain levels. The NAIC has a standard formula for annually assessing RBC
based on the various risk factors related to an insurance companys capital and surplus, including
insurance, business, asset and interest rate risks. At December 31, 2008, both of the Life
Companies exceeded the minimum RBC requirements. In addition, excluding the impact of the
permitted and prescribed practices above would not have reduced the total adjusted capital to
levels subjecting the Life Companies to any regulatory action.
The ability of the Life Companies to pay dividends to the parent company is restricted because
prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner is required for payment of dividends to the
stockholder which exceed an annual limitation. An annual dividend limitation is defined under the
Iowa Insurance Holding Company Act as any dividend or distribution of cash or other property whose
fair value, together with that of other dividends or distributions made within the preceding 12
months, exceeds the greater of (i) 10% of adjusted policyholders surplus (total statutory capital
stock and statutory surplus less certain admitted deferred tax assets) as of December 31 of the
preceding year, or (ii) the statutory net gain from operations of the insurer for the 12-month
period ending December 31 of the preceding year. During 2009, the maximum amount legally available
for distribution to FBL Financial Group, Inc. without further regulatory approval from Farm Bureau
Life is $38.2 million. EquiTrust Life cannot pay a dividend without regulatory approval in 2009
due to its unassigned surplus position at December 31, 2008.
14) Segment Information
We analyze operations by reviewing financial information regarding products that are aggregated
into four product segments. The product segments are: (1) Traditional Annuity Exclusive
Distribution (Exclusive Annuity), (2) Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution
(Independent Annuity), (3) Traditional and Universal Life Insurance and (4) Variable. We also
have various support operations and corporate capital that are aggregated into a Corporate and
Other segment.
126
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Exclusive Annuity segment primarily consists of fixed rate annuities and supplementary
contracts (some of which involve life contingencies) sold through our exclusive agency
distribution. Fixed rate annuities provide for tax-deferred savings and supplementary contracts
provide for the systematic repayment of funds that accumulate interest. Fixed rate annuities
consist primarily of flexible premium deferred annuities, but also include single premium deferred
and immediate contracts. With fixed rate annuities, we bear the underlying investment risk and
credit interest to the contracts at rates we determine, subject to interest rate guarantees.
The Independent Annuity segment consists of fixed rate annuities and supplementary contracts (some
of which involve life contingencies) sold through our independent distribution or assumed through
coinsurance agreements. The Independent Annuity segment also includes index annuities. With index
annuity products, we bear the underlying investment risk and credit interest in an amount equal to
a percentage of the gain in a specified market index, subject to minimum guarantees.
The Traditional and Universal Life Insurance segment consists of whole life, term life and
universal life policies. These policies provide benefits upon the death of the insured and may
also allow the customer to build cash value on a tax-deferred basis.
The Variable segment consists of variable universal life insurance and variable annuity contracts.
These products are similar to universal life insurance and traditional annuity contracts, except
the contract holder has the option to direct the cash value of the contract to a wide range of
investment sub-accounts, thereby passing the investment risk to the contract holder.
The Corporate and Other segment consists of the following corporate items and products/services
that do not meet the quantitative threshold for separate segment reporting:
|
|
|
investments and related investment income not specifically allocated to our product
segments; |
|
|
|
interest expense; |
|
|
|
accident and health insurance products, primarily a closed block of group policies; |
|
|
|
advisory services for the management of investments and other companies; |
|
|
|
marketing and distribution services for the sale of mutual funds and insurance products
not issued by us; and |
|
|
|
leasing services, primarily with affiliates. |
We analyze our segment results based on pre-tax operating income (loss). Accordingly, income taxes
are not allocated to the segments. In addition, operating results are generally reported net of
any transactions between the segments. Operating income (loss) for 2008, 2007 and 2006 represents
net income (loss) excluding the impact of:
|
|
|
realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments; |
|
|
|
changes in net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives; |
|
|
|
the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles; and |
|
|
|
a nonrecurring lawsuit settlement. |
We use operating income (loss), in addition to net income (loss), to measure our performance since
realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments and the change in net unrealized gains and
losses on derivatives can fluctuate greatly from quarter to quarter. Also, the cumulative effect
of changes in accounting principles, discontinued operations and the lawsuit settlement in 2006 are
nonrecurring items. These fluctuations make it difficult to analyze core operating trends. In
addition, for derivatives not designated as hedges, there is a mismatch between the valuation of
the asset and liability when deriving net income (loss). Specifically, call options relating to
our index business are one or two-year assets while the embedded derivative in the index contracts
represents the rights of the contract holder to receive index credits over the entire period the
index annuities are expected to be in force. For our other embedded derivatives in the product
segments and interest rate swaps backing our annuity liabilities, the derivatives are marked to
market, but the associated insurance liabilities are not marked to market. A view of our operating
performance without the impact of these mismatches and nonrecurring items enhances the analysis of
our results. We use operating income (loss) for goal setting, determining company-wide short-term
127
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
incentive compensation and evaluating performance on a basis comparable to that used by many in the
investment community.
Financial Information Concerning our Operating Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
143,711 |
|
|
$ |
150,403 |
|
|
$ |
147,365 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
333,361 |
|
|
|
376,887 |
|
|
|
236,447 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
340,164 |
|
|
|
335,093 |
|
|
|
326,018 |
|
Variable |
|
|
64,384 |
|
|
|
63,380 |
|
|
|
59,010 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
33,013 |
|
|
|
38,351 |
|
|
|
29,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
914,633 |
|
|
|
964,114 |
|
|
|
798,513 |
|
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments (A) |
|
|
(156,467 |
) |
|
|
5,769 |
|
|
|
13,970 |
|
Change in net unrealized gains/losses on derivatives (A) |
|
|
(113,701 |
) |
|
|
(55,284 |
) |
|
|
74,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues |
|
$ |
644,465 |
|
|
$ |
914,599 |
|
|
$ |
887,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
145,309 |
|
|
$ |
146,267 |
|
|
$ |
146,433 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
395,127 |
|
|
|
309,131 |
|
|
|
225,206 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
143,324 |
|
|
|
144,231 |
|
|
|
142,620 |
|
Variable |
|
|
14,257 |
|
|
|
13,658 |
|
|
|
14,437 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
9,855 |
|
|
|
14,744 |
|
|
|
7,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net investment income |
|
$ |
707,872 |
|
|
$ |
628,031 |
|
|
$ |
535,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
13,546 |
|
|
$ |
10,453 |
|
|
$ |
8,159 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
123,702 |
|
|
|
67,508 |
|
|
|
53,727 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
19,853 |
|
|
|
20,474 |
|
|
|
13,283 |
|
Variable |
|
|
17,038 |
|
|
|
8,489 |
|
|
|
8,763 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
11,322 |
|
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
9,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,461 |
|
|
|
116,877 |
|
|
|
93,891 |
|
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments (A) |
|
|
(34,095 |
) |
|
|
(1,171 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gains/losses on derivatives (A) |
|
|
57,496 |
|
|
|
(28,592 |
) |
|
|
3,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
208,862 |
|
|
$ |
87,114 |
|
|
$ |
96,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
27,946 |
|
|
$ |
33,011 |
|
|
$ |
35,555 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
5,360 |
|
|
|
39,875 |
|
|
|
30,439 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
53,059 |
|
|
|
58,685 |
|
|
|
58,706 |
|
Variable |
|
|
(1,584 |
) |
|
|
12,514 |
|
|
|
3,596 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(12,377 |
) |
|
|
(2,020 |
) |
|
|
(3,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,404 |
|
|
|
142,065 |
|
|
|
124,361 |
|
Income taxes on operating income |
|
|
(22,812 |
) |
|
|
(46,444 |
) |
|
|
(41,218 |
) |
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments (A) |
|
|
(79,542 |
) |
|
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
9,222 |
|
Change in net unrealized gains/losses on derivatives (A) |
|
|
11,801 |
|
|
|
(13,500 |
) |
|
|
936 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Lawsuit settlement (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18,149 |
) |
|
$ |
86,339 |
|
|
$ |
90,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
2,593,176 |
|
|
$ |
2,455,569 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
8,116,304 |
|
|
|
7,076,313 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
2,619,677 |
|
|
|
2,544,906 |
|
Variable |
|
|
984,872 |
|
|
|
1,247,877 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
597,471 |
|
|
|
727,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,911,500 |
|
|
|
14,051,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) (A) |
|
|
(684,072 |
) |
|
|
(54,819 |
) |
Other classification adjustments |
|
|
(166,614 |
) |
|
|
(69,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated assets |
|
$ |
14,060,814 |
|
|
$ |
13,927,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Amounts are net of adjustments, as applicable, to amortization of unearned revenue reserves,
deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, value of insurance in force
acquired and income taxes attributable to these items. |
Depreciation and amortization related to property and equipment are allocated to the product
segments while the related property, equipment and capitalized software are generally allocated to
the Corporate and Other segment. Depreciation and amortization for the Corporate and Other segment
include $5.9 million for 2008, $7.8 million for 2007 and $7.6 million for 2006 relating to leases
with affiliates. In the consolidated statements of operations, we record these depreciation
amounts net of related lease income from affiliates.
Our investment in equity method investees and the related equity income and interest expense are
attributable to the Corporate and Other segment. Expenditures for long-lived assets were not
significant during the periods presented above. Goodwill at December 31, 2008 and 2007 is
allocated among the segments as follows: Exclusive Annuity ($3.9 million), Traditional and
Universal Life Insurance ($6.1 million) and Corporate ($1.2 million).
Net statutory premiums collected, which include premiums collected from annuities and universal
life-type products that are not included in revenues for GAAP reporting, totaled $2,156.9 million
in 2008, $2,078.4 million in 2007 and $2,296.2 million in 2006.
Premium Concentration by State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Life and annuity collected premiums (excluding
Independent Annuity segment): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
Kansas |
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Annuity segment collected premiums: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Florida |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
California |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Texas |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
129
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
15) Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Quarter ended |
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Premiums and product charges |
|
$ |
65,254 |
|
|
$ |
70,554 |
|
|
$ |
69,213 |
|
|
$ |
71,364 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
168,494 |
|
|
|
172,173 |
|
|
|
181,888 |
|
|
|
185,317 |
|
Derivative loss |
|
|
(98,896 |
) |
|
|
(31,685 |
) |
|
|
(40,951 |
) |
|
|
(37,261 |
) |
Realized losses on investments |
|
|
(29,347 |
) |
|
|
(74,021 |
) |
|
|
(27,156 |
) |
|
|
(22,813 |
) |
Total revenues |
|
|
111,370 |
|
|
|
143,976 |
|
|
|
189,539 |
|
|
|
202,552 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
6,438 |
|
|
|
(16,575 |
) |
|
|
11,216 |
|
|
|
(19,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
(0.64 |
) |
Earnings (loss) per common
share assuming dilution |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Quarter ended |
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Premiums and product charges |
|
$ |
61,523 |
|
|
$ |
66,905 |
|
|
$ |
63,880 |
|
|
$ |
66,903 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
149,962 |
|
|
|
154,582 |
|
|
|
157,016 |
|
|
|
166,471 |
|
Derivative income (loss) |
|
|
(3,877 |
) |
|
|
44,826 |
|
|
|
6,327 |
|
|
|
(52,227 |
) |
Realized/unrealized gains
(losses) on investments |
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
(775 |
) |
Total revenues |
|
|
216,160 |
|
|
|
273,915 |
|
|
|
237,668 |
|
|
|
186,856 |
|
Net income |
|
|
24,111 |
|
|
|
33,846 |
|
|
|
16,499 |
|
|
|
11,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Earnings per common share
assuming dilution |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
Net income (loss) decreased $19.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to changes in
assumptions used to amortize deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements on
direct business issued by EquiTrust Life. See Note 1, Significant Accounting Policies, for more
information regarding amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales
inducements.
The differences between the derivative income (loss) by quarter primarily correspond to the
performance of the indices upon which our call options are based and the timing of option
settlements. These differences are partially offset by changes to the embedded derivatives in
index contracts included in benefits and expenses. The net impact of changes in unrealized gains
and losses on derivates on net income (loss) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
3,535 |
|
|
$ |
4,939 |
|
|
$ |
5,270 |
|
|
$ |
(1,943 |
) |
2007 |
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
8,278 |
|
|
|
(10,319 |
) |
|
|
(12,802 |
) |
130
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
At the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the
Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Our internal control over financial reporting changes from time-to-time as we modify and enhance
our systems and processes to meet our dynamic needs. Changes are also made as we strive to be more
efficient in how we conduct our business. Any significant changes in controls are evaluated prior
to implementation to help ensure the continued effectiveness of our internal controls and internal
control environment. While changes have taken place in our internal controls during the quarter
ended December 31, 2008, there have been no changes that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
See page 83 for Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have been
no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
these controls subsequent to the date of this examination.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
There is no information required to be disclosed on Form 8-K for the quarter ended December 31,
2008 which has not been previously reported.
PART III
The information required by Part III, Items 10 through 14, is hereby incorporated by reference from
our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days after December 31, 2008.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
1. |
|
|
Financial Statements. See Table of Contents following the cover page for a list
of financial statements included in this Report. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules. The following financial statement
schedules are included as part of this Report immediately following the signature
page: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule I Summary of Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule II Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Parent Company) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule III Supplementary Insurance Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule IV Reinsurance |
131
All other schedules are omitted, either because they are not applicable, not required, or because
the information they contain is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or
notes.
|
|
|
3(i)(a)
|
|
Restated
Articles of Incorporation, filed with Iowa Secretary of State
March 19, 1996 (G) |
3(i)(b)
|
|
Articles of Amendment, Designation of Series A Preferred Stock, filed with Iowa Secretary
of State April 30, 1996 (G) |
3(i)(c)
|
|
Articles of Amendment, Designation of Series B Preferred Stock, filed with Iowa Secretary
of State May 30, 1997 (G) |
3(i)(d)
|
|
Articles of Correction, filed with Iowa Secretary of State October 27, 2000 (G) |
3(i)(f)
|
|
Articles of Amendment, filed with Iowa Secretary of State May 15, 2003 (G) |
3(i)(g)
|
|
Articles of Amendment, filed with Iowa Secretary of State May 14, 2004 (G) |
3(ii)(a)
|
|
Second Restated Bylaws, adopted May 14, 2004 (G) |
3(ii)(b)
|
|
Amendment to Article VI of Second Restated Bylaws adopted May 16, 2007 (P) |
3(ii)(c)
|
|
Amendment to Article V, Sections 5.2 and 5.4 of Second Restated Bylaws adopted August 20,
2008. |
4.1
|
|
Form of Class A Common Stock Certificate of the Registrant (A) |
4.2
|
|
Restated Stockholders Agreement Regarding Management and Transfer of Shares of Class B
Common Stock of FBL Financial Group, Inc. dated as of March 31, 2004 (G) |
4.3
|
|
Certificate of Trust; Declaration of Trust of FBL Financial Group Capital Trust dated May
30, 1997, including in Annex I thereto the form of Trust Preferred Security and the form
of Trust Common Security; Subordinated Deferrable Interest Note Agreement dated May 30,
1997 between FBL Financial Group, Inc. and FBL Financial Group Capital Trust, including
therein the form of Subordinated Deferrable Interest Note; Preferred Securities Guarantee
Agreement of FBL Financial Group, Inc., dated May 30, 1997 (B) |
4.4(a)
|
|
Master Transaction Agreement between Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines and Farm Bureau
Life Insurance Company dated May 1, 2006 (M) |
4.4(b)
|
|
Advance Agreement between Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines and Farm Bureau Life
Insurance Company dated September 12, 2006 (M) |
4.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and related Schedules and Exhibits dated as of
October 7, 2005 between FBL Financial Group, Inc. and Bank of America as successor to
LaSalle Bank National Association, together with amendments dated January 20, 2006, March
12, 2007 and November 5, 2008. These documents are not filed pursuant to the exception
of Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A); FBL Financial Group, Inc. agrees to furnish
these documents to the Commission upon request. |
4.6
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 12, 2004, between FBL Financial Group, Inc. and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee (F) |
4.7
|
|
Form of 5.85% Senior Note Due 2014 (F)
|
4.8
|
|
Form of 9.25% Senior Notes Due 2011 and attached registration rights agreement. These
documents are not filed pursuant to the exception of Regulation S-K, Item
601(b)(4)(iii)(A); FBL Financial Group, Inc. agrees to furnish these documents to the
Commission upon request. |
4.10
|
|
Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2007, between FBL Financial Group, Inc. and LaSalle
Bank National Association as Trustee (O) |
4.11
|
|
Form of 5.875% Senior Note Due 2017 (O)
|
10.1
|
|
2006 Class A Common Stock Compensation Plan adopted May 17, 2006 (L) *
|
10.1(a)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement, pursuant to the FBL Financial Group, Inc. 2006 Class A
Common Stock Compensation Plan (L)* |
10.2
|
|
Trademark License from the American Farm Bureau Federation to Farm Bureau Life Insurance
Company dated May 20, 1987 (A) |
10.3
|
|
Membership Agreement between American Farm Bureau Federation and the Iowa Farm Bureau
Federation dated February 13, 1987 (A) |
10.4
|
|
Form of Royalty Agreement with Farm Bureau organizations (I)
|
10.5
|
|
Executive Salary and Bonus Deferred Compensation Plan, effective June 1, 2005 (J) *
|
10.6
|
|
2008 Revised Rules for Payment of Meeting Fees, Retainers and Expenses to the Board of
Directors (Q) * |
10.7
|
|
Form of Services Agreement between FBL Financial Group, Inc. and Farm Bureau Management
Corporation, dated as of January 1, 1996 (A) |
10.8
|
|
Management Services Agreement between FBL Financial Group, Inc. and Farm Bureau |
132
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual
effective as of January 1, 2003 (E) |
10.10
|
|
Management Performance Plan (2008) sponsored by FBL Financial Group, Inc. (Q) * |
10.14
|
|
Lease Agreement dated as of March 31, 1998 between IFBF Property Management, Inc., FBL
Financial Group, Inc. and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (C) |
10.15
|
|
Building Management Services Agreement dated as of March 31, 1998 between IFBF Property
Management, Inc. and FBL Financial Group, Inc. (C) |
10.16
|
|
Coinsurance Agreement between EquiTrust Life Insurance Company and American Equity
Investment Life Insurance Company, dated December 29, 2003 (E) |
10.17
|
|
First Amendment to the Coinsurance Agreement by and between EquiTrust Life Insurance
Company and American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company, effective August 1, 2004
(H) |
10.18
|
|
Form of Change In Control Agreement Form A effective January 1, 2009 between the Company
and James W. Noyce, John M. Paule, Bruce A. Trost, James P. Brannen and Richard J. Kypta
* |
10.19
|
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement Form B effective January 1, 2009 between the Company
and Douglas W. Gumm, Charles T. Happel, David T. Sebastian and Donald J. Seibel * |
10.23
|
|
Form of Early Retirement Agreement, dated June 1, 1993 executed by the Company and James
W. Noyce (K) * |
10.24
|
|
Summary of Named Executive Officer Compensation * |
10.25
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2007 between the Company and
each of James W. Noyce, John M. Paule, Bruce A. Trost, James P. Brannen, Douglas W. Gumm,
David T. Sebastian and Donald J. Seibel (N) * |
10.26
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2008 between the Company and
each of James W. Noyce, Richard J. Kypta, John M. Paule, Bruce A. Trost, James P.
Brannen, Douglas W. Gumm, David T. Sebastian and Donald J. Seibel (Q) * |
12
|
|
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of FBL Financial Group, Inc. |
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* exhibit relates to a compensatory plan for management or directors
Incorporated by reference to:
(A) Form S-1 filed on July 11, 1996, File No. 333-04332
(B) Form 8-K filed on June 6, 1997, File No. 001-11917
(C) Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998, File No. 001-11917
(D) Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, File No. 001-11917
(E) Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, File No. 001-11917
(F) Form S-4 filed on May 5, 2004, File No. 333-115197
(G) Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, File No. 001-11917
(H) Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, File No. 001-11917
(I) Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, File No. 001-11917
(J) Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, File No. 001-11917
(K) Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, File No. 001-11917
(L) Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, File No. 001-11917
(M) Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, File No. 001-11917
(N) Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, File No. 001-11917
(O) Form S-4 filed on April 6, 2007, File No. 333-141949
133
(P) Form 8-K filed on May 16, 2007, File No. 001-11917
(Q) Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, File No. 001-11917
(R) Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, File No. 001-11917
134
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, this 18th day of February, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James W. Noyce
|
|
|
|
James W. Noyce |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated;
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
/s/ JAMES W. NOYCE
James W. Noyce |
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
and Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ JAMES P. BRANNEN
James P. Brannen |
|
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ CRAIG A. LANG
Craig A. Lang |
|
Chairman of the Board and Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ JERRY L. CHICOINE
Jerry L. Chicoine |
|
Vice Chair and Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ STEVE L. BACCUS
Steve L. Baccus |
|
Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ TIM H. GILL
Tim H. Gill |
|
Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ ROBERT H. HANSON
Robert H. Hanson |
|
Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ CRAIG D. HILL
Craig D. Hill |
|
Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ PAUL E. LARSON
Paul E. Larson |
|
Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ EDWARD W. MEHRER
Edward W. Mehrer |
|
Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ KEITH R. OLSEN
Keith R. Olsen |
|
Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ KIM M. ROBAK
Kim M. Robak |
|
Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ KEVIN G. ROGERS
Kevin G. Rogers |
|
Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
/s/ JOHN E. WALKER
John E. Walker |
|
Director
|
|
February 18, 2009 |
135
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON SCHEDULES
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of FBL Financial Group, Inc. as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and have
issued our report thereon dated February 18, 2009 (included elsewhere in this Form 10-K). Our
audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in Item 15(a)2 of this Form 10-K.
These schedules are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above, when considered in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in
2007, the Company changed its methods of accounting for the treatment of modifications or exchanges
of insurance contracts, income tax contingencies and cash flow hedges on certain fixed annuity
contracts.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
February 18, 2009
136
Schedule I Summary of Investments Other
Than Investments in Related Parties
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column A |
|
Column B |
|
|
Column C |
|
|
Column D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount at which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shown in the balance |
|
Type of Investment |
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
5,810,370 |
|
|
$ |
4,829,629 |
|
|
$ |
4,829,629 |
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
3,002,190 |
|
|
|
2,569,769 |
|
|
|
2,569,769 |
|
United States Government and agencies |
|
|
242,033 |
|
|
|
250,893 |
|
|
|
250,893 |
|
State, municipal and other governments |
|
|
1,445,491 |
|
|
|
1,310,626 |
|
|
|
1,310,626 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,505,084 |
|
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
|
8,965,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities, available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks, trusts, and insurance companies |
|
|
41,005 |
|
|
$ |
30,147 |
|
|
|
30,147 |
|
Industrial, miscellaneous, and all other |
|
|
10,953 |
|
|
|
14,716 |
|
|
|
14,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
51,958 |
|
|
$ |
44,863 |
|
|
|
44,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
1,381,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,381,854 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
129,979 |
|
|
$ |
12,933 |
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
Investment real estate |
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
Policy loans |
|
|
182,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,421 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,527 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
262,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
12,517,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,854,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On the basis of cost adjusted for repayments and amortization of premiums and accrual of
discounts for fixed maturities and short-term investments; original cost for equity
securities, real estate and other long-term investments; original cost net of collateral
received for derivative instruments; and unpaid principal balance for mortgage loans on real
estate and policy loans. |
137
Schedule II Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. (PARENT COMPANY)
Condensed Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
Amounts receivable from affiliates |
|
|
11,518 |
|
|
|
10,831 |
|
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries (eliminated in consolidation) |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
4,630 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
Current income taxes recoverable |
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
2,927 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
7,194 |
|
|
|
6,660 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
65,795 |
|
|
|
5,916 |
|
Fixed
maturities-available for sale, at market (amortized cost:
2008 - $15,474, 2007 - $46,990) |
|
|
16,224 |
|
|
|
45,774 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries (eliminated in consolidation) |
|
|
590,752 |
|
|
|
1,154,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
700,107 |
|
|
$ |
1,234,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
$ |
9,087 |
|
|
$ |
14,047 |
|
Amounts payable to affiliates |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Amounts payable to subsidiaries (eliminated in consolidation) |
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
59,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt payable to affiliates |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
271,005 |
|
|
|
316,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
441,742 |
|
|
|
331,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Class A common stock |
|
|
104,090 |
|
|
|
101,221 |
|
Class B common stock |
|
|
7,522 |
|
|
|
7,525 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(649,758 |
) |
|
|
(36,345 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
793,511 |
|
|
|
827,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
258,365 |
|
|
|
902,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
700,107 |
|
|
$ |
1,234,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
138
Schedule II Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Continued)
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. (PARENT COMPANY)
Condensed Statements of Operations
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
1,717 |
|
|
$ |
4,425 |
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
Realized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
(3,524 |
) |
|
|
(2,488 |
) |
|
|
408 |
|
Dividends from subsidiaries (eliminated in consolidation) |
|
|
24,300 |
|
|
|
13,900 |
|
|
|
98,200 |
|
Management fee income from affiliates |
|
|
3,509 |
|
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
2,631 |
|
Management fee income from subsidiaries (eliminated in
consolidation) |
|
|
6,589 |
|
|
|
6,345 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
Other income |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
32,470 |
|
|
|
25,766 |
|
|
|
108,562 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
19,540 |
|
|
|
16,611 |
|
|
|
11,744 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
5,784 |
|
|
|
6,360 |
|
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
25,324 |
|
|
|
22,971 |
|
|
|
16,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,146 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
91,683 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries |
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
7,171 |
|
|
|
93,904 |
|
Equity in undistributed income (loss) (dividends in excess
of equity income (loss)) of subsidiaries (eliminated in
consolidation) |
|
|
(31,474 |
) |
|
|
79,168 |
|
|
|
(3,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18,149 |
) |
|
$ |
86,339 |
|
|
$ |
90,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
139
Schedule II Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Continued)
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. (PARENT COMPANY)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(8,729 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,502 |
) |
|
$ |
(53,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale, maturity or repayment of investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,550 |
|
Acquisition of investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments net |
|
|
(59,879 |
) |
|
|
(6,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
(15,460 |
) |
|
|
(97,600 |
) |
|
|
(14,930 |
) |
Investment in subsidiaries (eliminated in consolidation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,783 |
) |
Dividends from subsidiaries (eliminated in consolidation) |
|
|
24,300 |
|
|
|
13,900 |
|
|
|
64,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(48,923 |
) |
|
|
(88,844 |
) |
|
|
52,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt payable to affiliates |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term debt payable to affiliates |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of short-term debt payable to affiliates |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term debt |
|
|
13,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax deductions on stock-based compensation |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
8,004 |
|
|
|
12,663 |
|
Capital contributions to subsidiary |
|
|
(40,551 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(15,060 |
) |
|
|
(14,393 |
) |
|
|
(13,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
59,053 |
|
|
|
93,447 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decreas)e in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
(899 |
) |
|
|
(776 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received during the year for income taxes |
|
$ |
4,789 |
|
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
$ |
5,633 |
|
Cash paid during the year for interest |
|
|
18,843 |
|
|
|
15,095 |
|
|
|
11,744 |
|
Non-cash investing activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity
securities contributed to subsidiary |
|
|
(41,649 |
) |
|
|
(47,263 |
) |
|
|
(49,117 |
) |
Short-term investments contributed to subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities received from subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,576 |
|
Non-cash financing activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of debt from long-term to short-term |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
140
Schedule II Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Continued)
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. (PARENT COMPANY)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
December 31, 2008
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto of FBL Financial Group, Inc.
In the parent company only financial statements, our investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost
plus equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries since the date of acquisition. In
addition, the carrying value includes net unrealized gains/losses on the subsidiaries investments
classified as available for sale and derivative instruments accounted for as hedges.
2. Dividends from Subsidiary
The parent company received cash dividends totaling $24.3 million in 2008, $13.9 million in 2007
and $64.6 million in 2006 and non-cash dividends consisting of fixed maturity securities including
purchased interest with a market value of $33.6 million in 2006. There were no non-cash dividends
received during 2008 or 2007.
3. Debt
See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the parent companys
short-term and long-term debt. This debt matures as follows: 2009 $59.4 million, 2011 $100.0
million, 2014 and thereafter $271.1 million.
141
Schedule III Supplementary Insurance Information
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column A |
|
Column B |
|
|
Column C |
|
|
Column D |
|
|
Column E |
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Future policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
policy |
|
|
benefits, losses, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
acquisition |
|
|
claims and loss |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
policyholder |
|
|
|
costs |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
funds |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional
Annuity-Exclusive
Distribution |
|
$ |
89,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,970,182 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
382,874 |
|
Traditional
Annuity-Independent
Distribution |
|
|
479,288 |
|
|
|
7,574,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,029 |
|
Traditional and Universal
Life Insurance |
|
|
245,020 |
|
|
|
2,060,176 |
|
|
|
10,995 |
|
|
|
156,161 |
|
Variable |
|
|
153,395 |
|
|
|
229,728 |
|
|
|
16,727 |
|
|
|
9,466 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
Impact of unrealized
gains/ losses |
|
|
398,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,365,609 |
|
|
$ |
11,898,729 |
|
|
$ |
34,663 |
|
|
$ |
682,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional
Annuity-Exclusive
Distribution |
|
$ |
80,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,825,394 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
392,257 |
|
Traditional
Annuity-Independent
Distribution |
|
|
468,528 |
|
|
|
6,769,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,050 |
|
Traditional and Universal
Life Insurance |
|
|
230,398 |
|
|
|
2,003,916 |
|
|
|
10,970 |
|
|
|
153,555 |
|
Variable |
|
|
156,055 |
|
|
|
204,877 |
|
|
|
17,287 |
|
|
|
7,032 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of unrealized
gains/ losses |
|
|
55,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
991,155 |
|
|
$ |
10,872,210 |
|
|
$ |
28,448 |
|
|
$ |
608,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional
Annuity-Exclusive
Distribution |
|
$ |
78,169 |
|
|
$ |
1,830,561 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
399,051 |
|
Traditional
Annuity-Independent
Distribution |
|
|
384,375 |
|
|
|
5,366,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
Traditional and Universal
Life Insurance |
|
|
220,858 |
|
|
|
1,966,198 |
|
|
|
11,801 |
|
|
|
153,549 |
|
Variable |
|
|
146,934 |
|
|
|
211,048 |
|
|
|
17,319 |
|
|
|
8,976 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of unrealized
gains/ losses |
|
|
(2,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
827,720 |
|
|
$ |
9,446,163 |
|
|
$ |
28,436 |
|
|
$ |
562,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
Schedule III Supplementary Insurance Information (Continued)
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column A |
|
Column F |
|
|
Column G |
|
|
Column H |
|
|
Column I |
|
|
Column J |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, claims, |
|
|
of deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
losses and |
|
|
policy |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Premium |
|
|
Net investment |
|
|
settlement |
|
|
acquisition |
|
|
operating |
|
|
|
revenue |
|
|
income |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
costs |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity-Exclusive
Distribution |
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
$ |
145,309 |
|
|
$ |
93,815 |
|
|
$ |
11,948 |
|
|
$ |
10,002 |
|
Traditional Annuity-Independent
Distribution |
|
|
30,467 |
|
|
|
395,127 |
|
|
|
234,713 |
|
|
|
78,214 |
|
|
|
15,075 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life
Insurance |
|
|
196,873 |
|
|
|
143,324 |
|
|
|
207,192 |
|
|
|
18,156 |
|
|
|
41,693 |
|
Variable |
|
|
48,209 |
|
|
|
14,257 |
|
|
|
24,883 |
|
|
|
15,540 |
|
|
|
24,881 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
Change in net unrealized
gains/losses on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161,526 |
) |
|
|
29,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of realized gains/losses |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,862 |
) |
|
|
(25,412 |
) |
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
276,385 |
|
|
$ |
707,872 |
|
|
$ |
391,215 |
|
|
$ |
128,114 |
|
|
$ |
93,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity-Exclusive
Distribution |
|
$ |
1,111 |
|
|
$ |
146,267 |
|
|
$ |
97,204 |
|
|
$ |
9,942 |
|
|
$ |
10,246 |
|
Traditional
Annuity-Independent
Distribution |
|
|
20,466 |
|
|
|
309,131 |
|
|
|
277,212 |
|
|
|
47,588 |
|
|
|
12,212 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life
Insurance |
|
|
190,860 |
|
|
|
144,231 |
|
|
|
191,030 |
|
|
|
20,133 |
|
|
|
43,825 |
|
Variable |
|
|
46,790 |
|
|
|
13,658 |
|
|
|
18,482 |
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
|
|
24,059 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,096 |
|
Change in net unrealized
gains/losses on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,265 |
) |
|
|
(16,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Impact of realized gains/losses |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
259,211 |
|
|
$ |
628,031 |
|
|
$ |
565,127 |
|
|
$ |
68,394 |
|
|
$ |
93,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity-Exclusive
Distribution |
|
$ |
1,091 |
|
|
$ |
146,433 |
|
|
$ |
94,394 |
|
|
$ |
7,074 |
|
|
$ |
10,342 |
|
Traditional
Annuity-Independent
Distribution |
|
|
15,612 |
|
|
|
225,206 |
|
|
|
155,787 |
|
|
|
39,550 |
|
|
|
10,671 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life
Insurance |
|
|
183,398 |
|
|
|
142,620 |
|
|
|
188,784 |
|
|
|
12,823 |
|
|
|
43,201 |
|
Variable |
|
|
43,334 |
|
|
|
14,437 |
|
|
|
22,794 |
|
|
|
7,533 |
|
|
|
24,381 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,558 |
|
Change in net unrealized
gains/losses on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,688 |
|
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of realized gains/losses |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Lawsuit Settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
243,434 |
|
|
|
535,836 |
|
|
|
533,464 |
|
|
|
68,541 |
|
|
|
95,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
Schedule IV Reinsurance
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column A |
|
Column B |
|
|
Column C |
|
|
Column D |
|
|
Column E |
|
|
Column F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded to other |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
|
Gross amount |
|
|
companies |
|
|
companies |
|
|
Net amount |
|
|
assumed to net |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Year ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance in force, at
end of year |
|
$ |
43,513,321 |
|
|
$ |
9,144,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,503,808 |
|
|
$ |
35,872,906 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums and other
considerations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and
index product charges |
|
$ |
109,522 |
|
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
$ |
18,797 |
|
|
$ |
127,199 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
Traditional life insurance
premiums |
|
|
165,775 |
|
|
|
19,924 |
|
|
|
3,335 |
|
|
|
149,186 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Accident and health premiums |
|
|
11,155 |
|
|
|
10,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
286,452 |
|
|
$ |
31,821 |
|
|
$ |
22,132 |
|
|
$ |
276,763 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance in force, at
end of year |
|
$ |
41,092,455 |
|
|
$ |
8,482,773 |
|
|
$ |
1,573,705 |
|
|
$ |
34,183,387 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums and other
considerations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and
index product charges |
|
$ |
94,686 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
20,795 |
|
|
$ |
114,529 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
% |
Traditional life insurance
premiums |
|
|
159,436 |
|
|
|
18,455 |
|
|
|
3,701 |
|
|
|
144,682 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Accident and health premiums |
|
|
11,715 |
|
|
|
11,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
265,837 |
|
|
$ |
30,768 |
|
|
$ |
24,496 |
|
|
$ |
259,565 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance in force, at
end of year |
|
$ |
38,371,878 |
|
|
$ |
8,012,799 |
|
|
$ |
1,626,519 |
|
|
$ |
31,985,598 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums and other
considerations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and
index product charges |
|
$ |
84,825 |
|
|
$ |
1,726 |
|
|
$ |
21,934 |
|
|
$ |
105,033 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
Traditional life insurance
premiums |
|
|
151,338 |
|
|
|
17,028 |
|
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
138,401 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Accident and health premiums |
|
|
12,356 |
|
|
|
11,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
248,519 |
|
|
$ |
30,695 |
|
|
$ |
26,025 |
|
|
$ |
243,849 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144