10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission File Number: 1-11917
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Iowa
|
|
42-1411715 |
|
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5400 University Avenue, West Des Moines, Iowa
|
|
50266-5997 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller
reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Outstanding at May 6, 2009 |
Class A Common Stock, without par value
|
|
29,218,427 |
Class B Common Stock, without par value
|
|
1,192,990 |
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale, at market
(amortized cost: 2009 - $10,453,306; 2008 - $10,505,084) |
|
$ |
8,881,526 |
|
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
Equity securities available for sale, at market (cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 - $61,260; 2008 - $51,958) |
|
|
44,953 |
|
|
|
44,863 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
1,362,146 |
|
|
|
1,381,854 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
15,755 |
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
Investment real estate |
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
Policy loans |
|
|
183,423 |
|
|
|
182,421 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,527 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
383,183 |
|
|
|
262,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
10,875,126 |
|
|
|
10,854,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
11,444 |
|
|
|
37,710 |
|
Securities and indebtedness of related parties |
|
|
18,971 |
|
|
|
18,921 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
143,801 |
|
|
|
136,893 |
|
Amounts receivable from affiliates |
|
|
8,936 |
|
|
|
15,791 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
107,460 |
|
|
|
107,854 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
1,375,292 |
|
|
|
1,365,609 |
|
Deferred sales inducements |
|
|
431,934 |
|
|
|
420,147 |
|
Value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
61,912 |
|
|
|
63,121 |
|
Property and equipment, less allowances for depreciation of
$63,184 in 2009 and $63,730 in 2008 |
|
|
20,835 |
|
|
|
23,074 |
|
Current income taxes recoverable |
|
|
24,569 |
|
|
|
14,389 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
285,377 |
|
|
|
305,080 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
11,170 |
|
|
|
11,170 |
|
Collateral held for securities lending and other transactions |
|
|
38,223 |
|
|
|
67,953 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
34,987 |
|
|
|
41,623 |
|
Assets held in separate accounts |
|
|
522,591 |
|
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,972,628 |
|
|
$ |
14,060,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy liabilities and accruals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index products |
|
$ |
10,520,377 |
|
|
$ |
10,531,967 |
|
Traditional life insurance and accident and health products |
|
|
1,338,662 |
|
|
|
1,328,506 |
|
Unearned revenue reserve |
|
|
34,813 |
|
|
|
34,663 |
|
Other policy claims and benefits |
|
|
29,894 |
|
|
|
38,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,923,746 |
|
|
|
11,933,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholders funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary contracts without life contingencies |
|
|
510,762 |
|
|
|
504,885 |
|
Advance premiums and other deposits |
|
|
174,158 |
|
|
|
167,473 |
|
Accrued dividends |
|
|
10,407 |
|
|
|
10,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
695,327 |
|
|
|
682,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts payable to affiliates |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,446 |
|
Long-term debt payable to affiliates |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
271,025 |
|
|
|
271,005 |
|
Collateral payable for securities lending and other transactions |
|
|
39,925 |
|
|
|
69,656 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
147,582 |
|
|
|
108,588 |
|
Liabilities related to separate accounts |
|
|
522,591 |
|
|
|
577,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
13,701,026 |
|
|
|
13,802,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholdersequity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc. stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, without par value, at liquidation value
authorized 10,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 5,000,000
Series B shares |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Class A common stock, without par value authorized
88,500,000 shares, issued and outstanding 29,172,275 shares in
2009 and 28,975,889 shares in 2008 |
|
|
105,558 |
|
|
|
104,090 |
|
Class B common stock, without par value authorized 1,500,000
shares, issued and outstanding 1,192,990 shares |
|
|
7,522 |
|
|
|
7,522 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(648,469 |
) |
|
|
(649,758 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
803,892 |
|
|
|
793,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total FBL Financial Group, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
271,503 |
|
|
|
258,365 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
271,602 |
|
|
|
258,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
13,972,628 |
|
|
$ |
14,060,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product charges |
|
$ |
41,140 |
|
|
$ |
29,121 |
|
Traditional life insurance premiums |
|
|
37,954 |
|
|
|
36,133 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
184,069 |
|
|
|
168,494 |
|
Derivative loss |
|
|
(24,601 |
) |
|
|
(98,896 |
) |
Realized investment gains |
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses (2009
includes total impairment losses of $31,127, less
$9,506 recognized in other comprehensive loss) |
|
|
(21,621 |
) |
|
|
(29,347 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
4,586 |
|
|
|
5,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
223,478 |
|
|
|
111,370 |
|
Benefits and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product benefits |
|
|
114,436 |
|
|
|
104,761 |
|
Change in value of index product embedded derivatives |
|
|
(8,669 |
) |
|
|
(103,170 |
) |
Traditional life insurance benefits |
|
|
22,104 |
|
|
|
27,252 |
|
Increase in traditional life future policy benefits |
|
|
9,718 |
|
|
|
11,390 |
|
Distributions to participating policyholders |
|
|
4,921 |
|
|
|
5,270 |
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses |
|
|
71,963 |
|
|
|
46,691 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
4,451 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
4,930 |
|
|
|
5,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits and expenses |
|
|
226,335 |
|
|
|
102,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
8,770 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
(2,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income, net of related income taxes |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
|
6,429 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to FBL Financial Group, Inc |
|
$ |
(1,490 |
) |
|
$ |
6,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per common share assuming dilution |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.1250 |
|
|
$ |
0.1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc. Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A and |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock (a) |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
108,746 |
|
|
$ |
(36,345 |
) |
|
$ |
827,490 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
902,982 |
|
Change in measurement date of
benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income three months
ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,438 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
6,429 |
|
Change in net unrealized
investment gains/losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,665 |
) |
Change in underfunded status
of other postretirement
benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,222 |
) |
Adjustment resulting from
capital transactions of equity
investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Stock-based compensation,
including the issuance of
142,330 common shares under
compensation plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,238 |
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,726 |
) |
Receipts related to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
111,978 |
|
|
$ |
(137,996 |
) |
|
$ |
829,394 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
806,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
111,612 |
|
|
$ |
(649,758 |
) |
|
$ |
793,511 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
258,461 |
|
Reclassification of non-credit
impairment losses from prior
periods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,641 |
) |
|
|
15,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss three months
ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,490 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
Change in net unrealized
investment gains/losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,105 |
|
Non-credit impairment losses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,185 |
) |
Change in underfunded status
of other postretirement
benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,402 |
|
Stock-based compensation,
including the issuance of
196,386 common shares under
compensation plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,732 |
) |
Receipts related to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
113,080 |
|
|
$ |
(648,469 |
) |
|
$ |
803,892 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
271,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All activity for the periods shown relates to Class A Common Stock. |
|
(b) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to FBL Financial Group, Inc. aggregated
$15,440 and ($95,213) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
See accompanying notes.
5
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,528 |
) |
|
$ |
6,429 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments related to interest sensitive and index products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest credited/index credits to account balances, excluding
deferred sales inducements |
|
|
80,589 |
|
|
|
81,162 |
|
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives |
|
|
(8,669 |
) |
|
|
(103,170 |
) |
Charges for mortality and administration |
|
|
(40,014 |
) |
|
|
(27,216 |
) |
Deferral of unearned revenues |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
Amortization of unearned revenue reserve |
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
(399 |
) |
Provision for depreciation and amortization of property and equipment |
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
3,783 |
|
Provision for accretion and amortization of investments |
|
|
(1,994 |
) |
|
|
(2,285 |
) |
Realized losses on investments |
|
|
19,670 |
|
|
|
29,347 |
|
Change in fair value of derivatives |
|
|
18,029 |
|
|
|
82,779 |
|
Increase in traditional life and accident and health benefit accruals |
|
|
10,156 |
|
|
|
13,129 |
|
Policy acquisition costs deferred |
|
|
(36,756 |
) |
|
|
(40,192 |
) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
47,440 |
|
|
|
23,022 |
|
Amortization of deferred sales inducements |
|
|
19,387 |
|
|
|
12,683 |
|
Amortization of value of insurance in force |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
Change in accrued investment income |
|
|
(6,908 |
) |
|
|
(12,826 |
) |
Change in amounts receivable from/payable to affiliates |
|
|
7,438 |
|
|
|
6,087 |
|
Change in reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
11,810 |
|
Change in current income taxes |
|
|
(10,180 |
) |
|
|
(7,993 |
) |
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
10,340 |
|
|
|
10,416 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,609 |
|
|
|
(6,508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
117,264 |
|
|
|
81,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale, maturity or repayment of investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
231,571 |
|
|
|
203,042 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
19,309 |
|
|
|
19,306 |
|
Other long term investments |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
12,778 |
|
Policy loans |
|
|
9,732 |
|
|
|
10,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,467 |
|
|
|
245,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
(154,866 |
) |
|
|
(360,492 |
) |
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
(26,784 |
) |
Derivative instruments |
|
|
(21,683 |
) |
|
|
(84,509 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
(9,302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Policy loans |
|
|
(10,734 |
) |
|
|
(9,727 |
) |
Short-term investments net |
|
|
(120,724 |
) |
|
|
(27,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(317,784 |
) |
|
|
(508,602 |
) |
6
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Investing activities continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal, repayments of advances and
other distributions of capital from equity
investees |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
(5,129 |
) |
Disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(55,811 |
) |
|
|
(267,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receipts from interest sensitive and index
products credited to policyholder account balances |
|
|
584,562 |
|
|
|
454,592 |
|
Return of policyholder account balances on
interest sensitive and index products |
|
|
(608,988 |
) |
|
|
(249,270 |
) |
Repayment of short-term debt |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Receipts related to noncontrolling interests net |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Excess tax deductions on stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(3,770 |
) |
|
|
(3,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(87,719 |
) |
|
|
203,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(26,266 |
) |
|
|
17,389 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
37,710 |
|
|
|
84,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
11,444 |
|
|
$ |
101,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (received) during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
7,365 |
|
|
$ |
4,852 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(1,377 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
Non-cash operating activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferral of sales inducements |
|
|
13,654 |
|
|
|
18,390 |
|
See accompanying notes.
7
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
March 31, 2009
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of FBL Financial Group, Inc. (we or
the Company) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP
for complete financial statements. Our financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of
normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results
of operations. Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
We encourage you to refer to our consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended
December 31, 2008 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete description of our
material accounting policies. Also included in the Form 10-K is a description of areas of
judgments and estimates and other information necessary to understand our financial position and
results of operations.
Accounting Changes
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) Staff Position (FSP) No.
115-2 and 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. The FSP
provides guidance in determining whether impairments in debt securities are other-than-temporary
and require that the non-credit portion of an impairment be recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive loss rather than the statements of operations. The FSP also requires additional
disclosures relating to other-than-temporary impairments and unrealized losses on investments in
interim and annual financial statements. The impact of adoption reduced our net loss by $5.2
million ($0.17 per basic and diluted common share) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
resulted in a reclassification from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive loss of
$15.6 million for the non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairments on securities held on
January 1, 2009.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted FAS FSP No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume
and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4). FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance in
determining whether a market for a financial asset is not active and a transaction is not
distressed for fair value measurement purposes as defined in FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements.
The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements but did increase our disclosures about fair value measurements.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No.
160, Accounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements, an
amendment of ARB No 51. This Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which requires that the noncontrolling interest be
reported in equity, and the related net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) be included
in the respective lines of the consolidated financial statements. The impact of this adoption on
our consolidated financial statements was not significant and resulted in a reclassification of the
noncontrolling interest amounts for the current and prior periods.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. Statement No. 161 requires
entities that use derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about their objectives
and strategies for using such instruments, as well as any details of credit-risk-related contingent
features contained within derivatives. Statement No. 161 also requires entities to disclose
additional information about the amounts and location of derivatives located within the financial
statements, how the provisions of Statement No. 133 have been applied, and the impact that hedges
have on an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. See Note 3 for
disclosures about our derivative instruments and hedging activities.
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 08-6, Equity Method
Investment Accounting Considerations. EITF No. 08-6 establishes accounting and reporting
standards for valuing equity method investees and their equity transactions. As a result of this
adoption, equity adjustments resulting from capital transactions of equity investees are reported
as realized gains or losses in the consolidated statements of operations rather than the
consolidated statements of changes in stockholders equity. Application of this EITF is not
expected to be material to our financial statements.
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standard Board issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This FSP amends Statement No.
107, Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial Instruments and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim
Financial Reporting, and expands annual disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments
to interim financial statements. The FSP is effective for interim periods ending after June 15,
2009, with early adoption permitted for interim periods ending after March 15, 2009. We plan to
adopt the FSP during the second quarter of 2009 and do not believe that it will have a significant
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the 2008 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to
the 2009 financial statement presentation.
2. Investment Operations
Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities
Available-For-Sale Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities by Investment Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
5,729,713 |
|
|
$ |
37,643 |
|
|
$ |
(1,012,488 |
) |
|
$ |
4,754,868 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,959,565 |
|
|
|
33,663 |
|
|
|
(202,960 |
) |
|
|
1,790,268 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
807,520 |
|
|
|
23,784 |
|
|
|
(176,293 |
) |
|
|
655,011 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
218,833 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
(97,532 |
) |
|
|
121,625 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
52,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,574 |
) |
|
|
5,437 |
|
United States Government and agencies |
|
|
254,957 |
|
|
|
12,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,362 |
|
State, municipal and other governments |
|
|
1,425,707 |
|
|
|
5,572 |
|
|
|
(148,412 |
) |
|
|
1,282,867 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
$ |
10,453,306 |
|
|
$ |
113,391 |
|
|
$ |
(1,685,171 |
) |
|
$ |
8,881,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-redeemable preferred stocks |
|
$ |
40,649 |
|
|
$ |
3,759 |
|
|
$ |
(19,324 |
) |
|
$ |
25,084 |
|
Common stocks |
|
|
20,611 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
19,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities |
|
$ |
61,260 |
|
|
$ |
3,760 |
|
|
$ |
(20,067 |
) |
|
$ |
44,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments have been excluded from the above schedules as amortized cost approximates
fair value for these securities.
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Available-For-Sale Fixed Maturity Securities by Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
127,175 |
|
|
$ |
121,882 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
1,222,651 |
|
|
|
1,095,800 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
2,912,294 |
|
|
|
2,452,348 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
3,200,268 |
|
|
|
2,640,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,462,388 |
|
|
|
6,310,534 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,959,565 |
|
|
|
1,790,268 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
807,520 |
|
|
|
655,011 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
218,833 |
|
|
|
121,625 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,453,306 |
|
|
$ |
8,881,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right
to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Net Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
Unrealized depreciation on: |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
$ |
(1,571,780 |
) |
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
(16,307 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,588,596 |
) |
Adjustments for assumed changes in amortization pattern of: |
|
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
421,412 |
|
Deferred sales inducements |
|
|
152,283 |
|
Value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
24,896 |
|
Unearned revenue reserve |
|
|
(7,343 |
) |
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
349,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(648,271 |
) |
Proportionate share of net unrealized investment gains of
equity investees |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized investment losses |
|
$ |
(648,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The changes in net unrealized investment gains and losses are recorded net of deferred income
taxes and other adjustments for assumed changes in the amortization pattern of deferred policy
acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, value of insurance in force acquired and unearned
revenue reserve totaling $39.9 million for the three-months ended March 31, 2009.
We monitor the financial condition and operations of the issuers of securities rated below
investment grade and of the issuers of certain investment grade securities on which we have
concerns regarding credit quality. In determining whether or not an unrealized loss is other than
temporary, we review factors such as:
|
|
|
historical operating trends; |
|
|
|
|
business prospects; |
|
|
|
|
status of the industry in which the company operates; |
|
|
|
|
analyst ratings on the issuer and sector; |
|
|
|
|
quality of management; |
|
|
|
|
size of the unrealized loss; |
|
|
|
|
level of current market interest rates compared to market interest rates when the
security was purchased; |
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position; and |
|
|
|
|
our intent and ability to hold the security. |
Fixed Maturity Securities with Unrealized Losses by Length of Time Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than one year |
|
|
One year or more |
|
|
Total |
|
Description of |
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Securities |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
2,010,972 |
|
|
$ |
(271,266 |
) |
|
$ |
1,814,988 |
|
|
$ |
(741,222 |
) |
|
$ |
3,825,960 |
|
|
$ |
(1,012,488 |
) |
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
38,192 |
|
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
1,110,441 |
|
|
|
(201,686 |
) |
|
|
1,148,633 |
|
|
|
(202,960 |
) |
Commercial
mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
125,071 |
|
|
|
(17,891 |
) |
|
|
143,586 |
|
|
|
(158,402 |
) |
|
|
268,657 |
|
|
|
(176,293 |
) |
Other asset-backed
securities |
|
|
15,050 |
|
|
|
(17,631 |
) |
|
|
101,030 |
|
|
|
(79,901 |
) |
|
|
116,080 |
|
|
|
(97,532 |
) |
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
(46,574 |
) |
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
(46,574 |
) |
State, municipal and
other governments |
|
|
601,060 |
|
|
|
(43,441 |
) |
|
|
525,336 |
|
|
|
(104,971 |
) |
|
|
1,126,396 |
|
|
|
(148,412 |
) |
Redeemable preferred
stocks |
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
$ |
2,794,433 |
|
|
$ |
(352,415 |
) |
|
$ |
3,700,818 |
|
|
$ |
(1,332,756 |
) |
|
$ |
6,495,251 |
|
|
$ |
(1,685,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the above table are 1,391 securities from 910 issuers at March 31, 2009. The
unrealized losses are primarily due to wide spreads between the risk-free and corporate and other
bond yields. The following summarizes the more significant unrealized losses by investment
category as of March 31, 2009.
Corporate securities: The unrealized losses on corporate securities represent 60.1% of our total
unrealized losses. The largest losses were in the financial services sector ($1,101.3 million
carrying value and $553.2 million unrealized loss). The largest unrealized losses in the financial
services sector were in the depository institutions sector ($351.0 million carrying value and
$211.1 million unrealized loss) and the holding and other investment offices sector ($429.9 million
carrying value and $194.3 million unrealized loss). The unrealized losses in the depository
institutions sector are primarily due to a decrease in market liquidity and concerns regarding the
underlying credit quality of subprime and other assets held by foreign or large national and
regional domestic banks. The majority of unrealized losses in the holding and other investment
offices sector are commercial real estate investment trust bonds. The unrealized losses in the
real estate investment trust bonds are primarily due to an increase in credit spreads due to the
sectors exposure to commercial real estate and market concerns about the ability to access the
capital markets.
The manufacturing sector ($817.4 million carrying value and $181.6 million unrealized loss) had a
concentration of losses in the paper and allied products sector ($79.6 million carrying value and
$37.2 million unrealized loss), the transportation and equipment sector ($69.1 million carrying
value and $19.9 million unrealized loss) and the petroleum and coal products sector ($87.2 million
carrying value and $15.3 million unrealized loss). The unrealized losses in these three sectors
are due to spread widening that is the result of weaker operating results. The unrealized losses
in the remaining corporate sectors are also primarily attributable to spread widening generally due
to a decrease in market liquidity, and increase in market volatility and concerns about the general
health of the economy.
Because we do not intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell these securities before
their anticipated recovery, which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
Residential mortgage-backed securities: The unrealized losses on residential mortgage-backed
securities represent 12.0% of our total unrealized losses, and were caused primarily by concerns
regarding mortgage defaults on Alt-A and other risky mortgages. These concerns resulted in spread
widening in the sector as liquidity decreased in the market. We purchased most of these
investments at a discount to their face amount and the contractual cash flows
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
of these investments are based on mortgages and other assets backing the securities. Because we do
not intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell these investments before their
anticipated recovery, which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
Commercial mortgage-backed securities: The unrealized losses on commercial mortgage-backed
securities represent 10.5% of our total unrealized losses, and were caused primarily by spread
widening and industry concerns regarding the potential for future commercial mortgage defaults
There were also concerns regarding current and future downgrades by the three major rating agencies
for tranches below the super senior AAA level. The contractual cash flows of these investments are
based on mortgages backing the securities. Because we do not intend to sell or believe we will be
required to sell these investments before their anticipated recovery, which may be maturity, we do
not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
Other asset-backed securities: The unrealized losses on asset-backed securities represent 5.8% of
our total unrealized losses, and were caused primarily by concerns regarding mortgage defaults on
subprime and home equity loans. There were also concerns regarding potential downgrades or
defaults of monoline bond insurers providing credit protection for underlying securities. These
concerns resulted in spread widening in the sector as liquidity decreased in the market. We
purchased most of these investments at a discount to their face amount and the contractual cash
flows of these investments are based on mortgages and other assets backing the securities. Because
we do not intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell these investments before their
anticipated recovery, which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
Collateralized debt obligations: The unrealized losses on collateralized debt obligations
represent 2.8% of our total unrealized losses. Our investments in synthetic collateralized debt
obligations are backed by credit default swaps with no home equity exposure. The unrealized losses
are primarily due to actual defaults in the collateral, general spread widening and market concerns
of increased defaults in the future. Our investment professionals have stress tested all of these
securities and determined that future principal losses are not expected based on reasonably adverse
conditions. Assuming a 35% recovery, on average these investments could all withstand six to
eleven more defaults without losing any principal. The number of defaults is an estimate based on
the remaining credit enhancement (subordination) that remains in each security. Each default that
occurs reduces subordination to the security, depending on the loss amount and exposure. Depending
on the investment, the synthetic collateralized debt obligations we own have exposure to
approximately 120 to 150 reference names, which results in an average default level of 5.0% to
10.0% before we would lose principal. Based on historical performance and current economic
conditions, we do not expect future defaults will exceed these levels and believe the existing
subordination is sufficient to maintain the value of our investments. In addition, because we do
not intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell these investments before their
anticipated recovery, which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
State, municipal and other governments: The unrealized losses on state, municipal and other
governments represent 8.8% of our total unrealized losses, and were primarily caused by general
spread widening and concerns regarding the stability of the credit quality of the monoline bond
insurers. We purchased most of these investments at a discount to their face amount and the
contractual cash flows of these investments are based on the taxing authority of a municipality or
the revenues of a municipal project. Because the decline in fair value is primarily attributable
to increased spreads and concerns regarding the stability of the monoline bond insurers, and
because we do not intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell these investments before
their anticipated recovery, which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
Excluding mortgage and asset-backed securities, no securities from the same issuer had an aggregate
unrealized loss in excess of $17.5 million at March 31, 2009. The $17.5 million unrealized loss is
from two B+ rated securities, which are hybrid financial debt obligations. These securities have
been impacted by the loss of market liquidity and concerns regarding the underlying credit quality
of subprime and other assets held by the financial institution. With respect to mortgage and
asset-backed securities not backed by the United States Government, no securities from the same
issuer had an aggregate unrealized loss in excess of $64.6 million at March 31, 2009. The $64.6
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
million unrealized loss from one issuer relates to 12 different securities that are backed by
different pools of commercial mortgage loans. All but one of the 12 securities are rated
investment grade and the largest unrealized loss on any one security totaled $11.1 million at March
31, 2009. The non-investment grade security had an unrealized loss of $4.1 million at March 31,
2009. Because we do not intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell these investments
before their anticipated recovery, which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to
be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
We also have $20.1 million of gross unrealized losses on equity securities with an estimated fair
value of $44.9 million at March 31, 2009. The majority of the unrealized losses are attributable
to non-redeemable perpetual preferred securities in the financial sector. The majority of the
unrealized losses on equity securities are less than one year ($11.2 million carrying value and
$16.8 million unrealized loss). The unrealized losses on these securities are primarily due to
concerns about the quality of the assets the issuers hold and uncertainty regarding when these
securities will be called. These securities are similar to fixed maturities as they provide
periodic cash flows, contain call features and are similarly rated and priced like other long-term
callable bonds. We do not intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell these investments
before their anticipated recovery; therefore we do not consider them to be other-than-temporarily
impaired at March 31, 2009.
Realized gains and losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of specific
identification. The carrying values of all our investments are reviewed on an ongoing basis for
credit deterioration. If this review indicates a decline in fair value that is other than
temporary, the carrying value of the investment is reduced to its fair value. Effective January 1,
2009, with adoption of FSP 115-2 and 124-2, when our review indicates a decline in fair value is
other than temporary, a specific write down is charged in earnings for the credit loss and a
specific charge is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the non-credit loss
component. For fixed maturity securities, the previous amortized cost adjusted by the credit loss
becomes the new cost basis for the security. For equity securities, the fair value becomes the new
cost basis for the security. Prior to 2009, the full amount of other-than-temporary impairment
write downs was recognized as a realized loss on investments in the statement of operations and the
fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities became the new cost basis for the security.
After an other-than-temporary write-down, the cost basis is generally not adjusted for subsequent
recoveries in fair value. However, for fixed maturity securities for which we can reasonably
estimate future cash flows after a write down, the discount or reduced premium recorded, based on
the new cost basis, is amortized over the remaining life of the security. Amortization in this
instance is computed using the prospective method and the current estimate of the amount and timing
of future cash flows.
When an other-than-temporary impairment occurs, the amount recognized in earnings is based on our
intent or requirement to sell the security and significant assumptions regarding the present value
of expected cash flows for each security. Our assumptions for corporate securities include
scheduled interest payments and an estimated recovery value, generally based on the original
effective interest rate. For residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed
securities, other asset backed securities and collateralized debt obligations, our assumptions
include collateral pledged, scheduled interest payments, default levels, delinquency rates, and the
level of nonperforming assets for the remainder of the investments expected term. Our United
States Government and agencies investment that was other-than-temporarily impaired relates to an
investment that we do not intend to hold until recovery of its amortized cost basis; therefore, the
impairment charge was recognized in earnings. We did not have any state, municipal and other
government investments that were other-than-temporarily impaired during the period.
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Credit Loss Component of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Fixed Maturity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
(106,421 |
) |
Increases for which an impairment was not
previously recognized |
|
|
(17,186 |
) |
Increases to previously impaired investments |
|
|
(3,570 |
) |
Reductions due to sold investments |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(127,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Sales, Maturities and Principal Repayments on Fixed Maturity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Realized |
|
|
Realized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Scheduled principal repayments and
calls available for sale |
|
$ |
96,427 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
96,427 |
|
Sales available for sale |
|
|
133,224 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
135,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
229,651 |
|
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
|
$ |
(148 |
) |
|
$ |
231,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
Our mortgage loan portfolio consists principally of commercial mortgage loans that we have
originated. Our lending policies require that the loans be collateralized by the value of the
related property, establish limits on the amount that can be loaned to one borrower and require
diversification by geographic location and collateral type.
We establish an allowance as needed, consisting of specific reserves, for possible losses against
our mortgage loan portfolio. An allowance is needed for loans in which we do not believe we will
collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the respective loan agreements. In
2009, we established a valuation allowance for two impaired loans totaling $0.9 million. There was
no valuation allowance for mortgage loans at December 31, 2008. At March 31, 2009, we also had
two mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure with total outstanding principal balance of $12.3
million and property appraised value of $14.7 million.
3. Derivative Instruments
We have entered into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with a portion of
our flexible premium deferred annuity contracts. Under the interest rate swaps, we pay a fixed
rate of interest and receive a floating rate of interest on a notional amount which totaled $100.0
million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. These interest rate swaps effectively fix the
interest crediting rate on a portion of our flexible premium deferred annuity contract liabilities
thereby hedging our exposure to increases in market interest rates. The interest rate settlements
increased derivative loss $1.2 million for the first quarter of 2009 and $0.1 million in 2008.
Derivative loss was reduced by $0.5 million for the first quarter of 2009 due to the change in
unrealized loss on these swaps.
In 2006, we also entered into one interest rate swap to hedge the variable component of the
interest rate on our $46.0 million outstanding line of credit borrowings at that time. The terms
of this instrument provide that we pay a fixed rate of interest and receive a floating rate of
interest on a notional amount of $46.0 million. We closed the line of credit agreement in the
first quarter of 2009 and began recording the change in fair value of the underlying swap and
interest payments in derivative loss. Prior to 2009, any gain or loss on the interest rate swap
settlements offset any increase or decrease in the interest paid on the line of credit, effectively
fixing our interest expense related to this portion of the line of credit. Losses from interest
rate settlements on this swap increased derivative loss $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2009
and increased interest expense less than $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2008. In 2009,
derivative loss also includes the unrealized loss on the swap at December 31, 2008 of $2.7 million,
which was
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
previously included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, partially offset by the swaps
increase in fair value during the first quarter of 2009, which totaled $0.3 million.
Summary of Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Receive |
|
|
Pay |
|
|
Carrying and Fair Value |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
1/1/2010 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1 month LIBOR* |
|
|
4.858 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,248 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,860 |
) |
10/7/2010 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
3 month LIBOR* |
|
|
4.760 |
|
|
|
(2,426 |
) |
|
|
(2,692 |
) |
6/1/2011 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1 month LIBOR* |
|
|
5.519 |
|
|
|
(4,955 |
) |
|
|
(4,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8,629 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
London Interbank Offered Rate |
When applicable, we formally document hedging relationships, our risk management objectives and
strategies for undertaking these transactions. We also test for hedge ineffectiveness at inception
of the hedge and at each reporting period as needed. There were no derivative instruments
designated as hedges at March 31, 2009. There was no ineffectiveness recorded in the consolidated
statements of operations during 2008 for instruments designated as hedges.
We write index annuities directly and assume index annuity business under a coinsurance agreement.
Index annuities guarantee the return of principal to the contract holder and credit amounts based
on a percentage of the gain in a specified market index. Most of the premium received is invested
in investment grade fixed income securities and a portion of the premium received from the contract
holder is used to purchase derivatives consisting of one-year or two-year call options on the
applicable market indices to fund the index credits due to the index annuity contract holders. On
the respective anniversary dates of the index annuity contracts, the market index used to compute
the index credits is reset and new call options are purchased to fund the next index credit.
Although the call options are designed to be effective hedges from an economic standpoint, they do
not meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment under Statement No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Therefore, the change in fair value of the options
is recognized in earnings in the period of change. The cost of the options can be managed through
the terms of the index annuities, which permit changes to participation rates, asset fees and/or
caps, subject to guaranteed minimums.
We held call options relating to our direct business, net of collateral received for counterparty
credit risk, with a fair value of $15.8 million at March 31, 2009 and $12.9 million at December 31,
2008. Our share of call options assumed, which is recorded as an embedded derivative in
reinsurance recoverable, totaled $4.3 million at March 31, 2009 and $5.6 million at December 31,
2008. Derivative loss includes ($21.7) million in the first quarter of 2009 and ($94.8) million
in the first quarter of 2008 relating to call option proceeds and changes in fair value.
The reserve for index annuity contracts includes a series of embedded derivatives that represent
the contract holders right to participate in index returns over the expected lives of the
applicable contracts. The reserve includes the value of the embedded forward options despite the
fact that call options are not purchased for a period longer than the period of time to the next
index reset date. The change in the value of this embedded derivative is reported on a separate
line in the consolidated statements of operations and totaled ($8.7) million in the first quarter
of 2009 and ($103.2) million in the first quarter of 2008.
We have modified coinsurance agreements where interest on funds withheld is determined by reference
to a pool of fixed maturity securities. These arrangements contain embedded derivatives requiring
bifurcation. Embedded derivatives in these contracts are recorded at fair value at each balance
sheet date and changes in the fair values of the derivatives are recorded as derivative income or
loss. The fair value of the embedded derivatives pertaining to funds withheld on variable business
assumed by us totaled ($0.2) million at March 31, 2009 and ($0.9) million at December 31, 2008.
The fair value of the embedded derivatives pertaining to funds withheld on business ceded by us was
$0.2 million at March 31, 2009 and $0.3 million at December 31, 2008. Derivative income from our
modified coinsurance contracts totaled $0.6 million for the first quarter of 2009 and $0.5 million
for the first quarter of 2008.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
4. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands the required disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair
value is based on an exit price, which is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. Statement No. 157 also establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and
ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring financial instruments at fair
value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of
instrument and the characteristics specific to the instrument. Financial instruments with readily
available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices
generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment
used in measuring fair value. For some investments little market activity may exist and
managements determination of fair value is then based on the best information available in the
circumstances, and may incorporate managements own assumptions of what a market participant would
consider for the fair value, which involves a significant degree of judgment.
The fixed income markets in 2008 and 2009 experienced a period of extreme volatility and limited
market liquidity conditions, which affected a broad range of asset classes and sectors. In
addition, there were credit downgrade events and an increased probability of default for many fixed
income instruments. These volatile market conditions increased the difficulty of valuing certain
instruments as trading was less frequent and/or market data was less observable. There were
certain instruments that were in active markets with significant observable data that became
illiquid due to the current financial environment or market conditions. As a result, certain
valuations require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods which are more
complex. These values may not ultimately be realizable in a market transaction, and such values
may change very rapidly as market conditions change and valuation assumptions are modified.
We have elected to report certain financial instruments at fair value in our consolidated balance
sheets using the methods and assumptions described below.
Fixed maturity securities: Fair values of fixed maturity securities are based on quoted market
prices in active markets when available. We have valued our investments using the valuation
methodologies described below which have been applied on a consistent basis.
Equity securities: The fair values for equity securities are based on quoted market prices, where
available. For equity securities that are not actively traded, estimated fair values are based on
values of comparable issues.
Derivative instruments: Fair values for call options are based on counterparty market prices
adjusted for a credit component of the counterparty, net of collateral received. Prices are
verified using analytical tools by our internal investment professionals.
Other long-term investments, cash and short-term investments: Amounts are reported at historical
cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums, depreciation or accrual of discounts, as applicable,
which approximates the fair values due to the nature of these assets.
Reinsurance recoverable: Reinsurance recoverable relating to our portion of the call options used
to fund index credits on the index annuities assumed from a reinsurer is reported at fair value.
Fair value is determined using quoted market prices for the call options, less an adjustment for
credit risk. Reinsurance recoverable also includes the embedded derivatives in our modified
coinsurance contracts under which we cede or assume business. Fair values for these embedded
derivatives are based on the difference between the fair value and the cost basis of the underlying
fixed maturity securities. We are not required to estimate fair value for the remainder of the
reinsurance recoverable balance.
Collateral held and payable for securities lending and other transactions: Fair values are
obtained from an independent pricing source whose results undergo evaluation by our internal
investment professionals.
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Assets held in separate accounts: Separate account assets are reported at estimated fair value in
our consolidated balance sheets based on quoted net asset values of the underlying mutual funds.
Future policy benefits index annuity embedded derivatives: Fair values of index annuity
embedded derivatives are calculated using discounted cash flow valuation techniques based on
current interest rates adjusted to reflect our credit risk and an additional provision for adverse
deviation.
Other liabilities: Fair values for the embedded derivatives in our modified coinsurance contracts
under which we cede or assume business are based on the difference between the fair value and the
cost basis of the underlying fixed maturity securities. Fair values for interest rate swaps are
based on counterparty market prices adjusted for a credit component of the counterparty, net of
collateral paid. Prices are verified using analytical tools by our internal investment
professionals.
Financial instruments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of
the following categories.
Level 1 Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical financial instruments as of
the reporting date. The types of financial instruments included in Level 1 are listed equities,
mutual funds, money market funds and non-interest bearing cash. As required by Statement No. 157,
we do not adjust the quoted price for these financial instruments, even in situations where we hold
a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level 2 Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets which are either directly
or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined through the use of
models or other valuation methods. Financial instruments which are generally included in this
category include fixed maturity securities (including public and private bonds), short-term
securities, less liquid and restricted equity securities and over-the-counter derivatives that are
priced by third-party pricing services or internal systems using observable inputs.
Fair values of all Level 2 fixed maturity public securities are obtained primarily from a variety
of independent pricing sources, whose results undergo evaluation by our internal investment
professionals. We generally obtain one or two prices per security, which are compared to relevant
credit information, perceived market movements and sector news. Market indices of similar rated
asset class spreads are consulted for valuations and broker indications of similar securities are
compared. If the issuer has had trades in similar debt outstanding but not necessarily the same
rank in the capital structure, spread information is used to support fair value. If discrepancies
are identified, additional quotes are obtained and the quote that best reflects a fair value exit
price at the reporting date is selected. Fair value of most of our private investments are
determined by our investment professionals using matrix pricing with substantially all observable
inputs, such as industry classification, duration and rating.
Level 3 Pricing inputs are unobservable for the financial instrument and include situations
where there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument. The inputs into the
determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial
instruments that are included in this category generally include non-binding broker and internally
priced mortgage or other assets backed securities and other publicly traded issues, private
corporate securities and index annuity embedded derivatives.
Fair values of private investments are determined by reference to public market, private
transactions or valuations for comparable companies or assets in the relevant asset class when such
amounts are available. For other securities where an exit price based on relevant observable
inputs is not obtained, the fair value is determined by our investment professionals using an
enhanced matrix calculation. The matrix pricing performed by pricing services and our internal
investment professionals includes a discounted cash flow analysis using a spread, including the
specific creditors credit default swap spread (if available), over U.S. Treasury bond yields,
adjusted for the maturity/average life differences. Spread adjustments are intended to reflect an
illiquidity premium and take into account a variety of factors including but not limited to:
senior unsecured versus secured status, par amount outstanding, number of holders, maturity,
average life, composition of lending group and debt rating. These valuation methodologies involve
a significant degree of judgment.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair
value hierarchy. In such cases, a financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is
based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety
requires judgment and considers factors specific to the financial instrument.
Valuation of our Financial Instruments by Fair Value Hierarchy Levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets |
|
|
Significant other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for identical |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets (Level 1) |
|
|
inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,579,715 |
|
|
$ |
175,153 |
|
|
$ |
4,754,868 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,701,976 |
|
|
|
88,292 |
|
|
|
1,790,268 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
635,716 |
|
|
|
19,295 |
|
|
|
655,011 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,399 |
|
|
|
16,226 |
|
|
|
121,625 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
5,437 |
|
United States Government and agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,362 |
|
State, municipal and other governments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,167,023 |
|
|
|
115,844 |
|
|
|
1,282,867 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
4,088 |
|
Non-redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,084 |
|
Common stocks |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
17,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,869 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
Cash and short-term investments |
|
|
394,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394,627 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,498 |
|
Collateral held for securities
lending and other transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,223 |
|
Assets held in separate accounts |
|
|
522,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits
index annuity embedded
derivatives |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
447,223 |
|
|
$ |
447,223 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
Collateral payable for
securities lending and other
transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,925 |
|
Approximately 4.8% of the total fixed maturities are included in the Level 3 group. The fair value
of the assets and liabilities above include the financial instruments nonperformance risk.
Nonperformance risk is the risk that the instrument will not be fulfilled and affects the value at
which the instrument could be transferred in an orderly transaction. The nonperformance risk for
our assets was valued at less than $0.6 million at March 31, 2009. The nonperformance risk for our
liabilities was valued at $219.3 million at March 31, 2009.
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Level 3 Fixed Maturity Investments by Valuation Source
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Third-party |
|
|
Priced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
vendors |
|
|
internally |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities (including
redeemable preferred stocks) |
|
$ |
153,583 |
|
|
$ |
25,658 |
|
|
$ |
179,241 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,292 |
|
|
|
88,292 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
13,766 |
|
|
|
5,529 |
|
|
|
19,295 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
16,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,226 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,437 |
|
State, municipals and other |
|
|
115,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
304,856 |
|
|
$ |
119,479 |
|
|
$ |
424,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of total |
|
|
71.8 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Financial Instruments Changes in Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mortgage- |
|
|
mortgage- |
|
|
asset- |
|
|
Collateralized |
|
|
States, |
|
|
long-term |
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
backed |
|
|
backed |
|
|
backed |
|
|
debt |
|
|
municipals |
|
|
invest- |
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
& other |
|
|
ments |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
648,688 |
|
|
$ |
70,003 |
|
|
$ |
24,122 |
|
|
$ |
17,201 |
|
|
$ |
7,414 |
|
|
$ |
140,189 |
|
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
Purchases (disposals), net |
|
|
(10,811 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized
gains (losses), net |
|
|
(3,474 |
) |
|
|
9,049 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
(2,572 |
) |
|
|
(1,976 |
) |
|
|
(4,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of
Level 3 (1) |
|
|
(455,128 |
) |
|
|
9,224 |
|
|
|
(5,590 |
) |
|
|
2,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
(amortization) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
179,241 |
|
|
$ |
88,292 |
|
|
$ |
19,295 |
|
|
$ |
16,226 |
|
|
$ |
5,437 |
|
|
$ |
115,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in unrealized gains/losses on level 3 investments held at March 31, 2009 was ($2,193)
million.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the transfers in and/or out line above is $535.3 million of securities
that were priced using a broker only quote at December 31, 2008 and were transferred to a
pricing service that uses observable market data in the prices and $66.1 million that were
transferred into Level 3 that did not have enough observable data to include in Level 2
this quarter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
Future Policy Benefits Index Product Embedded Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
523,515 |
|
Premiums less benefits, net |
|
|
(20,558 |
) |
Impact of unrealized gains (losses), net |
|
|
(55,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
447,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains/losses on embedded
derivatives held at March 31 (2) |
|
$ |
(55,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Excludes host accretion and the timing of posting index credits, which are included
with the change in value of index product embedded derivatives in the consolidated
statements of operations. |
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
5. Credit Agreement
At December 31, 2008, we had $60 million in borrowings on a revolving line of credit agreement with
Bank of America National Association and Bankers Trust Company, N.A. During the first quarter of
2009, we paid off all borrowings and closed the line of credit.
6. Defined Benefit Plan
We participate with several affiliates and an unaffiliated organization in various multiemployer
defined benefit plans. Our share of net periodic pension cost for the plans recorded as expense in
our consolidated statements of operations totaled $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The pension cost increased in
2009 primarily due to losses on plan assets in 2008.
Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost for all Employers in the Multiemployer Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1,860 |
|
|
$ |
1,659 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
3,890 |
|
|
|
3,709 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
|
|
(3,495 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
Settlement expense |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost all employers |
|
$ |
5,250 |
|
|
$ |
3,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, we may be involved in litigation where amounts are alleged that
are substantially in excess of contractual policy benefits or certain other agreements. At March
31, 2009, there are two class action lawsuits claims against EquiTrust Life Insurance Company
(EquiTrust Life). These lawsuits relate to the use of allegedly inappropriate sales techniques and
products for purchasers of EquiTrust Life deferred annuities. The plaintiffs in these cases are
seeking a variety of damages including injunctive relief, rescission, compensatory damages, and
punitive damages. These cases are in the pre-class certification stage and parties are conducting
initial discovery and are therefore subject to many uncertainties for which the outcomes cannot be
predicted. Given these uncertainties, we are unable to assess the likelihood of an adverse ruling
or estimate the loss or range of loss that may result from the pending litigation.
In the third quarter of 2008, the jury from a trial in Federal District Court in Utah involving an
agency matter awarded Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company (Farm Bureau Life) and Farm Bureau Mutual
Insurance Company (Farm Bureau Mutual) actual damages totaling $3.6 million and punitive damages
totaling $62.7 million. Approximately 25% of the award is allocable to Farm Bureau Life with the
remaining 75% allocable to Farm Bureau Mutual. In February 2009, the court ruled on various post
trial motions, upholding the actual damages, but reducing the punitive damages to $3.6 million.
The defendants have appealed this decision and Farm Bureau Life and Farm Bureau Mutual have
cross-appealed. Recoveries from third parties are required to be accounted for as gain
contingencies and not recorded in our financial statements until the lawsuit is resolved.
In 2006, we incurred a pre-tax charge of $4.9 million relating to the settlement of a lawsuit with
a husband and wife who had applied for life insurance policies. The settlement ended litigation
regarding the process we followed in denying insurance coverage for medical reasons. Insurance
claims have been filed under our professional liability and general liability insurance policies
for reimbursement of the settlement amount, but coverage has been denied, and we have made a claim
against an insurance broker for breach of contractual duties. We have filed lawsuits
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
against the
insurer and the insurance broker to recover those damages. While we have received an adverse
ruling in the case against the insurer at the district court level, the adverse ruling has been
appealed and we continue to believe both claims are valid. Recoveries from third parties are
required to be accounted for as gain contingencies and not recorded in our financial statements
until the lawsuits are resolved. Accordingly, any recoveries will be recorded in net income (loss)
in the period the recovery is received.
We seek to limit our exposure to loss on any single insured or event and to recover a portion of
benefits paid by ceding a portion of our exposure to other insurance enterprises or reinsurers.
Reinsurance contracts do not relieve us of our obligations to policyholders. To the extent that
reinsuring companies are later unable to meet obligations under reinsurance agreements, our
insurance subsidiaries would be liable for these obligations, and payment of these obligations
could result in losses. To limit the possibility of such losses, we evaluate the financial
condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentrations of credit risk. No allowance for
uncollectible amounts has been established against our asset for reinsurance recoverable since none
of our receivables are deemed to be uncollectible.
We self-insure our employee health and dental claims. However, claims in excess of our
self-insurance levels are fully insured. We fund insurance claims through a self-insurance trust.
Deposits to the trust are made at an amount equal to our best estimate of claims incurred during
the period. Accordingly, no accruals are recorded on our financial statements for unpaid claims
and claims incurred but not reported. Adjustments, if any, resulting in changes in the estimate of
claims incurred will be reflected in operations in the periods in which such adjustments are known.
8. Earnings per Share
Computation of Earnings per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to FBL Financial Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
(1,490 |
) |
|
$ |
6,438 |
|
Dividends on Series B preferred stock |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for earnings per common share - income
available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(1,528 |
) |
|
$ |
6,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
29,850,768 |
|
|
|
29,789,122 |
|
Deferred common stock units relating to deferred
compensation plans |
|
|
107,035 |
|
|
|
70,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for earnings per common share
weighted-average shares |
|
|
29,957,803 |
|
|
|
29,859,590 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share
adjusted weighted-average shares |
|
|
29,957,803 |
|
|
|
30,207,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share assuming dilution |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Segment Information
We analyze operations by reviewing financial information regarding products that are aggregated
into four product segments. The product segments are: (1) Traditional Annuity Exclusive
Distribution (Exclusive Annuity), (2) Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution
(Independent Annuity), (3) Traditional and Universal Life Insurance and (4) Variable. We also
have various support operations and corporate capital that are aggregated into a Corporate and
Other segment.
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
We analyze our segment results based on pre-tax operating income (loss). Accordingly, income taxes
are not allocated to the segments. In addition, operating results are generally reported net of
any transactions between the segments. Operating income (loss) for the first quarter represents
net income (loss) excluding, as applicable, the impact of realized and unrealized gains and losses
on investments and changes in net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives.
We use operating income, in addition to net income (loss), to measure our performance since
realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments and the change in net unrealized gains and
losses on derivatives can fluctuate greatly from quarter to quarter. These fluctuations make it
difficult to analyze core operating trends. In addition, for derivatives not designated as hedges,
there is a mismatch between the valuation of the asset and liability when deriving net income
(loss). Specifically, call options relating to our index business are one or two-year assets while
the embedded derivative in the index contracts represents the rights of the contract holder to
receive index credits over the entire period the index annuities are expected to be in force. For
our other embedded derivatives in the product segments and interest rate swaps, the derivatives are
marked to market, but the associated liabilities are not marked to market. A view of our operating
performance without the impact of these mismatches and nonrecurring items enhances the analysis of
our results. We use operating income for goal setting, determining company-wide short-term
incentive compensation and evaluating performance on a basis comparable to that used by many in the
investment community.
Financial Information Concerning our Operating Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
36,660 |
|
|
$ |
35,696 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
91,133 |
|
|
|
78,282 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
86,132 |
|
|
|
83,362 |
|
Variable |
|
|
16,145 |
|
|
|
15,935 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
5,598 |
|
|
|
8,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,668 |
|
|
|
221,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized losses on investments (A) |
|
|
(19,680 |
) |
|
|
(29,432 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gains/losses on derivatives (A) |
|
|
7,490 |
|
|
|
(80,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues |
|
$ |
223,478 |
|
|
$ |
111,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
6,826 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
7,795 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
15,443 |
|
|
|
8,164 |
|
Variable |
|
|
(3,825 |
) |
|
|
1,168 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(6,628 |
) |
|
|
(2,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,689 |
|
|
|
22,235 |
|
Income taxes on operating income |
|
|
(3,821 |
) |
|
|
(7,167 |
) |
Realized losses on investments (A) |
|
|
(11,040 |
) |
|
|
(12,165 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gains/losses on derivatives (A) |
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss) attributable to FBL Financial Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
(1,490 |
) |
|
$ |
6,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Amounts are net of adjustments, as applicable, to amortization of unearned revenue reserves,
deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, value of insurance in force
acquired and income taxes attributable to these items. |
Our investment in equity method investees, the related equity income and interest expense are
attributable to the Corporate and Other segment. Expenditures for long-lived assets were not
significant during the periods presented above. Goodwill at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
is allocated among the segments as follows: Exclusive Annuity ($3.9 million), Traditional and
Universal Life Insurance ($6.1 million) and Corporate ($1.2 million).
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section includes a summary of FBL Financial Group, Inc.s consolidated results of operations,
financial condition and where appropriate, factors that management believes may affect future
performance. Unless noted otherwise, all references to FBL Financial Group, Inc. (we or the
Company) include all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including its primary life insurance
subsidiaries, Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company (Farm Bureau Life) and EquiTrust Life Insurance
Company (EquiTrust Life) (collectively, the Life Companies). Please read this discussion in
conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes. In
addition, we encourage you to refer to our 2008 Form 10-K for a complete description of our
significant accounting policies and estimates. Familiarity with this information is important in
understanding our financial position and results of operations.
This Form 10-Q includes statements relating to anticipated financial performance, business
prospects, new products, and similar matters. These statements and others, which include words
such as expect, anticipate, believe, intend and other similar expressions, constitute
forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. A
variety of factors could cause our actual results and experiences to differ materially from the
anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements. See Part
1A, Risk Factors, of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on the risks
and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of our
business.
Impact of Recent Business Environment
The financial markets continued to be under stress in the first quarter of 2009 and this stress has
continued to impact the availability and cost of credit. These factors, combined with depressed
home prices and increasing foreclosures, falling equity market values, declining business and
consumer confidence and increased unemployment, have precipitated a severe recession. These
economic conditions did not negatively impact our sales in 2008 or 2009. However, an economic
downturn characterized by higher unemployment, lower family income, lower consumer spending, lower
corporate earnings and lower business investment may adversely impact the demand for our products
in the future. We also may experience a higher incidence of claims, lapses or surrenders of
policies. We cannot predict whether or when such actions may occur, or what impact, if any, such
actions could have on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
The fixed income markets are experiencing a period of extreme volatility and limited market
liquidity conditions, which has affected a broad range of asset classes and sectors. In addition,
there have been credit downgrade events and an increased probability of default for many fixed
income instruments. Equity markets have also been experiencing heightened volatility. These
events and the continuing market upheavals have had and may continue to have an adverse effect on
us. These volatile market conditions have also increased the difficulty of valuing certain
securities as trading is less frequent and/or market data is less observable. There were certain
securities that were in active markets with significant observable data that are now illiquid due
to the current financial environment or market conditions. As a result, certain valuations require
greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods which are more complex. These values
may not ultimately be realizable in a market transaction, and such values may change very rapidly
as market conditions change and valuation assumptions are modified.
The volatile and illiquid market conditions that have persisted throughout the first quarter of
2009 have kept the levels of credit spreads (difference between bond yields and risk-free interest
rates) on fixed maturity securities very wide. While the wide credit spreads have resulted in a
steeper yield curve making our annuity products more attractive to investors, it also caused a
significant reduction in the carrying value of our investments, negatively impacting our financial
condition and reported book value per share. These conditions also caused us to hold a higher
amount of cash and short-term investments in order to maintain a more liquid position during
uncertain times.
Our fixed annuity products contain features that allow contract holders to surrender a policy. To
encourage persistency, we impose a surrender charge against the account balance for early
termination of a contract within a specified period after its effective date. Most of the fixed
annuity products sold by the EquiTrust Life independent
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
channel offer a market value adjustment
(MVA) feature which is based on U.S. Treasury rates. This feature provides us interest rate
protection when U.S. Treasury interest rates are greater than the rates in effect when a contract
is issued and provides a benefit to contract holders when U.S. Treasury interest rates are less
than the rates in effect when a contract is issued. Late in 2008 and continuing into 2009, market
conditions emerged with unprecedented low U.S. Treasury yields providing an environment where
contract holders were able to surrender with smaller net surrender charges, increasing the level of
surrender activity. While we updated surrender assumptions in the models used to calculate
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements in the fourth
quarter of 2008, variances in actual net surrender charge income during 2009 compared to
projections resulted in additional amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs in the first
quarter. In addition, the increased surrender activity negatively impacted our spreads in 2009 as
we now have call option assets that no longer back an index product.
We maintain certain capital levels in accordance with statutory and rating agency requirements.
Fixed annuity products generally place a strain on statutory capital when sold and add to capital
in subsequent years. As a result of the significant growth of the EquiTrust Life independent
distribution channel business, our need for capital has increased in recent years. In addition,
our capital levels were negatively impacted during 2008 and 2009 as a result of the impact of the
increased surrender activity and realized and unrealized losses on our investments. In the last
half of 2008, we incurred additional debt to assist with our capital requirements and increase our
financial flexibility. We also took rate and other actions to reduce sales of new fixed rate
annuity contracts at EquiTrust Life and are evaluating the terms and conditions for future products
to preserve our capital position. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below for
additional details regarding our capital position.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, |
|
|
|
except per share data) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
223,478 |
|
|
$ |
111,370 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
226,335 |
|
|
|
102,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
8,770 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
(2,458 |
) |
Equity income |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
|
6,429 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to FBL Financial Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
(1,490 |
) |
|
$ |
6,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share assuming dilution |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, |
|
|
|
except per share data) |
|
Other data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct premiums collected, net of reinsurance ceded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
96,368 |
|
|
$ |
45,348 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
324,699 |
|
|
|
326,686 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
49,860 |
|
|
|
47,259 |
|
Variable Annuity and Variable Universal Life (1) |
|
|
26,180 |
|
|
|
41,921 |
|
Reinsurance assumed and other |
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
500,043 |
|
|
$ |
464,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct life insurance in force, end of quarter (in millions) |
|
$ |
43,993 |
|
|
$ |
41,576 |
|
Life insurance lapse rates |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Withdrawal rates individual traditional annuity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive Distribution |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Independent Distribution |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are net of portion ceded to and include amounts assumed from alliance partners. |
Premiums collected is not a measure used in financial statements prepared according to U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). There is no comparable GAAP financial measure.
We use premiums collected to measure the productivity of our exclusive and independent agents.
Direct Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution premiums collected segment increased in 2009
primarily due to lower short-term market interest rates making certificates of deposits and other
short-term investments less attractive in relation to our traditional fixed annuity products.
Direct premiums collected in the Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution segment decreased
in 2009 as a result of rate and other actions taken to preserve capital in the second half of 2008,
partially offset by a more favorable market environment for traditional annuity products. Variable
premiums collected tend to vary with volatility, performance of and confidence level in the equity
markets as well as crediting and interest rates on competing products, including fixed rate
annuities and bank-offered certificates of deposit.
The increase in the withdrawal rate for the Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution segment
in 2009 is primarily due to the impact of low U.S. Treasury yields on the MVA feature for our
direct fixed annuity products, which provided an environment where contract holders could surrender
with smaller net surrender charges. See additional details on this feature in the Liquidity and
Capital Resources section that follows. We also believe aging of the business in force relating
to the annuity business assumed under coinsurance agreements and business written directly through
the EquiTrust Life independent agents is driving a portion of the increase in withdrawal rates as
the surrender charge rate decreases with the passage of time (at a rate generally equal to 1.0% per
year). This makes a surrender later in the contract period more economical for the contract
holder, which results in higher lapse rates as the business ages.
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to FBL Financial Group, Inc.
Net income (loss) attributable to FBL Financial Group, Inc. (FBL Net Income (Loss)) was ($1.5)
million in the first quarter of 2009 compared to $6.4 million for the 2008 period. As discussed in
detail below, this decrease was primarily due to the impact of increased surrender activity in the
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution segment and poor equity market performance on the
Variable segment. These items are partially offset by lower death benefits and the impact of an
increase in the volume of business in force in the Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution
and Traditional and Universal Life Insurance segments. The increase in volume of business in force
is quantified by summarizing the face amount of insurance in force for traditional life products or
account values of contracts in force for interest sensitive products. The face amount of life
insurance in force represents the gross death benefit payable to policyholders and account value
represents the value of the contract to the contract holder before application of surrender charges
or reduction for any policy loans outstanding. The following discussion provides additional
details on the items impacting FBL Net Income (Loss).
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Spreads Earned on our Universal Life and Individual Annuity Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Weighted average yield on cash and invested assets |
|
|
6.15 |
% |
|
|
6.10 |
% |
Weighted average interest crediting rate/index cost |
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread |
|
|
2.17 |
% |
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average yield on cash and invested assets represents the yield on cash and investments
backing the universal life and individual traditional annuity products net of investment expenses.
The yield also includes gains or losses relating to our interest rate swap program for certain
individual traditional annuities. The impact of the swap program was previously reported in the
weighted average crediting rate/index costs and the 2008 results above have been restated to
conform to the 2009 presentation. With respect to our index annuities, index costs represent the
expenses we incur to fund the annual index credits through the purchase of options and minimum
guaranteed interest credited on the index business. The weighted average crediting rate/index cost
and spread are computed excluding the impact of the amortization of deferred sales inducements.
See the Segment Information section that follows for a discussion of our spreads.
Impact of Operating Adjustments on FBL Net Income (Loss)
As noted in the Segment Information section that follows, we use both net income (loss) and
operating income to measure our operating results. Operating income for the periods covered by
this report equals net income (loss), excluding the impact of realized gains and losses on
investments and the change in net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives. Our rationale for
excluding these items from operating income is also explained in Note 9 to our consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Realized losses on investments |
|
$ |
(19,670 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,347 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gains/losses on derivatives |
|
|
16,159 |
|
|
|
22,199 |
|
Change in amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(6,850 |
) |
|
|
(586 |
) |
Deferred sales inducements |
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
|
|
(5,613 |
) |
Value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
Unearned revenue reserve |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
Income tax offset |
|
|
5,039 |
|
|
|
4,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact of operating income adjustments |
|
$ |
(9,358 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of adjustments noted above after offsets and income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized losses on investments |
|
$ |
(11,040 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,165 |
) |
Change in net unrealized gains/losses on derivatives |
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact of operating income adjustments |
|
$ |
(9,358 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact per common share basic |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact per common share assuming dilution |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Changes in FBL Net Income (Loss)
FBL Net Income (Loss) totaled ($1.5) million in 2009 and $6.4 million in 2008. A detailed
discussion of changes in FBL Net Income (Loss) is included below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Premiums and product charges |
|
$ |
13,840 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
15,575 |
|
Derivative loss |
|
|
74,295 |
|
Realized losses on investments |
|
|
9,677 |
|
Other income and other expenses |
|
|
(254 |
) |
Interest sensitive and index products benefits and change in value
of index product embedded derivative |
|
|
(104,176 |
) |
Traditional life insurance policy benefits |
|
|
7,169 |
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses |
|
|
(25,272 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,481 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
3,714 |
|
Noncontrolling interest and equity income |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total change in FBL Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(7,928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Premiums and Product Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Premiums and product charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product charges |
|
$ |
41,140 |
|
|
$ |
29,121 |
|
Traditional life insurance premiums |
|
|
37,954 |
|
|
|
36,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
79,094 |
|
|
$ |
65,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and product charges increased 21.2% in the first quarter of 2009 to $79.1 million. The
increase in interest sensitive and index product charges is principally driven by surrender charges
on annuity products.
Surrender charges totaled $17.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $6.1 million
in the 2008 period. Surrender charges increased primarily due to an increase in surrenders
relating to the impact of MVAs on certain products sold by our EquiTrust Life independent
distribution, as discussed in the Impact of Recent Business Environment section above, and also
due to growth in the volume and aging of business in force.
Surrender Charges on EquiTrust Life Direct Fixed Annuity Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Surrender charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross surrender charges |
|
$ |
64,609 |
|
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
Market value adjustments |
|
|
(49,771 |
) |
|
|
(1,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net surrender charges |
|
$ |
14,838 |
|
|
$ |
3,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average aggregate account value for annuity and universal life insurance in force, which
increased due to increases in premiums collected as summarized in the Other data table above,
totaled $10,299.6 million for the three-month period in 2009 and $9,259.6 million for the
three-month period in 2008.
27
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Traditional premiums increased due to an increase in the volume of business in force. The increase
in the business in force is primarily attributable to sales of traditional life products by our
Farm Bureau Life agency force exceeding
the loss of in force amounts through deaths, lapses and surrenders. Our average aggregate
traditional life insurance in force, net of reinsurance ceded, totaled $23,203.4 million for the
three-month period in 2009 and $21,355.4 million for the three-month period in 2008. The change in
life insurance in force is not proportional to the change in premium income due to a shift in the
composition of our traditional life block of business from whole life policies to term policies.
The premium for a term policy per $1,000 face amount is less than that for a whole life policy.
Net Investment Income
Net investment income, which excludes investment income on separate account assets relating to
variable products, increased 9.2% in the first quarter of 2009 to $184.1 million primarily due to
an increase in average invested assets. Average invested assets in the three-month period of 2009
increased 10.0% to $12,446.5 million (based on securities at amortized cost) from $11,317.6 million
in the 2008 period, due principally to net premium inflows from the Life Companies during the
twelve-month period ended March 31, 2009. The annualized yield earned on average invested assets
decreased to 6.09% in the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 6.14% in the respective 2008
period. The decrease in yield is primarily due to holding higher cash and short-term investment
balances in order to maintain a more liquid position during a period of increased surrender
activity. In addition, short-term interest rates have declined significantly. The yield on our
primary short-term investment account was 0.19% at March 31, 2009 compared to 3.20% at March 31,
2009.
Fee income from bond calls, tender offers and mortgage loan prepayments totaled $0.1 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $1.3 million in the respective 2008 period. Net
investment income also includes $1.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
less than $0.1 million in the 2008 respective period of acceleration of net discount accretion on
mortgage and asset-backed securities resulting from changing prepayment speed assumptions at the
end of each respective period.
Derivative Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Derivative loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of derivative loss from call options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains received at expiration |
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
$ |
15,017 |
|
Change in the difference between fair
value and remaining option cost at
beginning and end of period |
|
|
8,804 |
|
|
|
(77,551 |
) |
Cost of money for call options |
|
|
(30,742 |
) |
|
|
(32,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,711 |
) |
|
|
(94,762 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2,890 |
) |
|
|
(4,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(24,601 |
) |
|
$ |
(98,896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains received at expiration decreased in the first quarter of 2009 as a result of declines in the
S&P 500 Index® (upon which the majority of our options are based). These gains are used to fund
index credits on index annuities, which also decreased in 2009, as discussed below under Interest
Sensitive and Index Product Benefits. The change in the difference between fair value and
remaining option cost at beginning and end of period decreased derivative loss by $86.4 million.
This change is primarily due to the decrease in the S&P 500 Index compared to the price of the
outstanding options, which generated larger losses for the 2008 period.
The cost of money for call options decreased primarily due to a decrease in the cost of options on
assumed business, partially offset by an increase in option costs resulting from volatility in the
equity markets. The average aggregate account value of index annuities in force, which has
increased due to new sales, partially offset by increased surrender activity from the independent
distribution channel and run-off of assumed business, totaled $4,686.6 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 compared to $4,594.3 million for the respective 2008 period. Other derivative
loss is comprised of income or loss from the embedded derivatives included in our modified
28
coinsurance contracts and interest rate swaps. In 2009, derivative loss also includes realized
losses on the interest rate swap that previously hedged our line of credit, which totaled $2.4
million. Derivative loss will fluctuate based on market conditions. See Note 3 to our
consolidated financial statements for additional details on our derivatives.
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Realized Losses on Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Realized gains (losses) on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sales |
|
$ |
2,099 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Losses on sales |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Credit losses on other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(21,621 |
) |
|
|
(29,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reported in statements of operations |
|
|
(19,670 |
) |
|
|
(29,347 |
) |
Non-credit losses included in AOCL |
|
|
(9,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(29,176 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The level of realized losses is subject to fluctuation from period to period depending on the
prevailing interest rate and economic environment and the timing of the sale of investments. See
Financial Condition Investments for details regarding our unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
We monitor the financial condition and operations of the issuers of securities rated below
investment grade and of the issuers of certain investment grade securities on which we have
concerns regarding credit quality. If we determine that an unrealized loss is other than
temporary, the security is written down to its fair value. Beginning in 2009, a portion of the
write-down attributable to non-credit factors is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
(AOCL). See additional details regarding the non-credit portion of the write-downs and our
methodology for evaluating investments for other-than-temporary impairment in Notes 1 and 2 to our
consolidated financial statements.
29
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Investment Impairments Recognized in FBL Net Loss Individually Exceeding $0.5 Million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description |
|
Impairment Loss |
|
Circumstance |
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major paper manufacturing company |
|
$ |
6,630 |
|
|
Issuer filed for bankruptcy
after unsuccessful attempts
to obtain financial
assistance. This reduced
estimates on potential
recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate investment trust |
|
$ |
6,299 |
|
|
Issuer filed for bankruptcy
after unsuccessful attempts
to obtain financial
assistance. This reduced
estimates on potential
recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Major printing & publishing company |
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred
due to expected revenue
declines which could result
in a future covenant
violation. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset backed security |
|
$ |
1,095 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred on
the monoline insurer
supporting this issue.
Financial recoveries are
fully dependent on the
insurer. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized bond obligation |
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred
and defaults of the
underlying collateral
supporting this issue
increased. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance carrier |
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred
and near term solvency
became a concern. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset backed security |
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred,
delinquencies increased and
credit support from the
lower tranches stopped
increasing. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other asset-backed security |
|
$ |
9,114 |
|
|
Ratings declined and
losses from the
underlying home equity
loans to Alt-A borrowers
increased. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligation |
|
$ |
9,100 |
|
|
The value of collateral
supporting this issue
declined, which triggered
an event whereby we did
not receive interest on
our investment. Rating
declines also occurred
during the quarter. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance carrier |
|
$ |
6,789 |
|
|
Rating declines occurred
and the fair value
decreased significantly
due to subprime and Alt-A
exposure and the parents
potential reorganization,
which reduced estimates
on potential recovery.
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Major printing & publishing company |
|
$ |
2,341 |
|
|
Issuer filed for
bankruptcy after
unsuccessful attempts to
obtain financial
assistance. This reduced
estimates on potential
recovery. (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Major printing & publishing company |
|
$ |
1,603 |
|
|
Rating declines and other
adverse details regarding
the financial status of
the company became
available. (A) |
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Negative trends in this segment of the industry were considered in our analysis, which is
done on an issue-by-issue basis. No additional write-downs were deemed necessary as of March
31, 2009 for other material investments in this industry. |
30
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Other Income and Other Expenses
Other income and other expenses include revenues and expenses, respectively, relating primarily to
our non-insurance operations. Our non-insurance operations include management, advisory, marketing
and distribution services and leasing activities. Fluctuations in these financial statement line
items are generally attributable to fluctuations in the level of these services provided during the
periods.
Interest Sensitive and Index Product Benefits and Change in Value of Index Product Embedded
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest sensitive and index product benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest credited |
|
$ |
79,160 |
|
|
$ |
66,679 |
|
Index credits |
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
14,608 |
|
Amortization of deferred sales inducements |
|
|
19,336 |
|
|
|
12,666 |
|
Interest sensitive death benefits |
|
|
14,595 |
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,436 |
|
|
|
104,761 |
|
|
Change in value of index product embedded derivatives |
|
|
(8,669 |
) |
|
|
(103,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
105,767 |
|
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product benefits and change in value of index product embedded
derivatives increased in the first quarter of 2009 to $105.8 million, primarily due to the impact
of the change in value of index product embedded derivatives, partially offset by the impact of an
increase in the volume of annuity business in force. Interest sensitive and index product benefits
tend to fluctuate from period to period primarily as a result of changes in mortality experience,
and the impact of changes in the equity markets on index credits, amortization of deferred sales
inducements and the value of the embedded derivatives in our index annuities.
The average aggregate account value of annuity contracts in force, which increased due to net
premium inflows from the Life Companies during the twelve-month period ended March 31, 2009,
totaled $9,402.4 million for the 2009 period and $8,368.7 million for the 2008 period. These
account values include values relating to index contracts in the first quarter totaling $4,686.6
million for 2009 and $4,594.3 million for 2008.
The weighted average interest crediting rate/index cost for universal life and individual
traditional annuity products, excluding the impact of the amortization of deferred sales
inducements, was 3.98% for the 2009 period and 3.92% for the 2008 period. See the Segment
Information section that follows for additional details on our spreads.
As discussed above under Derivative Loss, the change in the amount of index credits is impacted
by the volume of index annuities in force and the amount of appreciation/depreciation in the
underlying market indices on which our options are based. The change in the value of the embedded
derivatives is impacted by the change in expected index credits on the next policy anniversary
dates, which is related to the change in the fair value of the options acquired to fund these index
credits. The value of the embedded derivatives is also impacted by the timing of the posting of
index credits and changes in reserve discount rates and assumptions used in estimating future call
option costs. In addition, embedded derivatives in the index annuity reserves decreased $26.7
million in first quarter of 2008 due to the adoption of Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements.
The increase in amortization of deferred sales inducements is primarily due to the impact of
increased surrender activity from the EquiTrust Life independent distribution channel and an
increase in the volume of business in force. Deferred sales inducements on interest sensitive and
index products totaled $428.7 million at March 31, 2009 and $351.3 million at March 31, 2008.
31
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Traditional Life Insurance Policy Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Traditional life insurance policy benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional life insurance benefits |
|
$ |
22,104 |
|
|
$ |
27,252 |
|
Increase in traditional life future policy benefits |
|
|
9,718 |
|
|
|
11,390 |
|
Distributions to participating policyholders |
|
|
4,921 |
|
|
|
5,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
36,743 |
|
|
$ |
43,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional life insurance benefits decreased 16.3% in the first quarter of 2009 to $36.7 million
primarily due to a decrease in traditional life insurance death benefits and reserve adjustments in
2008, partially offset by the impact of an increase in the volume of traditional life business in
force. In the first quarter of 2009, death benefits decreased 31.2% to $12.7 million. The
increase in traditional life future policy benefits was lower this period primarily due to reserve
adjustments which increased term life reserves $1.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. The
change in traditional life future policy benefits may not be proportional to the change in
traditional premiums and benefits as reserves on term policies are generally less than reserves on
whole life policies. Traditional life insurance benefits can fluctuate from period to period
primarily as a result of changes in mortality experience.
Underwriting, Acquisition and Insurance Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission expense, net of deferrals |
|
$ |
3,573 |
|
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
47,440 |
|
|
|
23,022 |
|
Amortization of value of insurance in force acquired |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
Other underwriting, acquisition and insurance
expenses, net of deferrals |
|
|
20,209 |
|
|
|
19,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
71,963 |
|
|
$ |
46,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses increased 54.1% for the 2009 period to $72.0
million. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased in the first quarter due to
the impact of surrender activity from the EquiTrust Life independent distribution channel, an
increase in the volume of business in force and the impact of operating adjustments as detailed
under Impact of Operating Adjustments on FBL Net Income (Loss) above. Amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs on our EquiTrust Life distribution channel, excluding the impact of
operating adjustments, totaled $20.6 million in the first quarter of 2009 and $7.6 million in the
first quarter of 2008.
During the first quarter of 2009, we announced certain cost-saving measures that we anticipate will
reduce expenses by approximately $7.0 million, which will be partially offset with one-time charges
associated with implementing these cost-saving measures. During the first quarter of 2009, we
incurred $1.7 million in these one-time charges. In addition, pension expense increased $0.8
million during the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to losses on plan assets during 2008. These
additional costs were largely offset by reduced expenses from implementing various cost-saving
initiatives.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased 55.7% to $6.9 million in the first quarter of 2009, primarily due to an
increase in our debt outstanding. The average debt outstanding increased to $400.9 million for the
2009 period from $316.8 million for the 2008 period due to the issuance of Senior Notes in November
2008, partially offset by the pay-off of our line of credit borrowings in February 2009. The
average interest rate on our debt increased due to the new senior note having a higher coupon rate
than the effective rates on our existing debt and line of credit.
32
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Income Taxes
Income taxes for the first quarter of 2009 provided a benefit of $1.3 million compared to an
expense of $2.5 million in the 2008 period. The effective tax rate was 44.0% for the first quarter
of 2009 and 28.0% for the 2008 period. The effective tax rate was different than the federal
statutory rate of 35% primarily due to tax-exempt interest and tax-exempt dividend income. The
permanent differences between book and tax income increase the effective rate when there is a net
loss and decrease the effective rate when there is a net gain.
Equity Income, Net of Related Income Taxes
Equity income, net of related income taxes, totaled $0.1 million for the first quarters of 2009 and
2008. Equity income includes our proportionate share of gains and losses attributable to our
ownership interest in partnerships, joint ventures and certain companies where we exhibit some
control but have a minority ownership interest. Given the timing of availability of financial
information from our equity investees, we will consistently use information that is as much as
three months in arrears for certain of these entities. Several of these entities are investment
companies whose operating results are derived primarily from unrealized and realized gains and
losses generated by their investment portfolios. As is normal with these types of entities, the
level of these gains and losses is subject to fluctuation from period to period depending on the
prevailing economic environment, changes in prices of equity securities held by the investment
partnerships, timing and success of initial public offerings and other exit strategies, and the
timing of the sale of investments held by the partnerships and joint ventures.
Segment Information
We analyze operations by reviewing financial information regarding products that are aggregated
into four product segments. The product segments are: (1) Traditional Annuity Exclusive
Distribution (Exclusive Annuity), (2) Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution
(Independent Annuity), (3) Traditional and Universal Life Insurance and (4) Variable. We also
have various support operations and corporate capital that are aggregated into a Corporate and
Other segment.
We analyze our segment results based on pre-tax operating income (loss). Accordingly, income taxes
are not allocated to the segments. In addition, operating results are generally reported net of
any transactions between the segments. Operating income (loss) for the first quarter represents
net income (loss) excluding, as applicable, the impact of realized gains and losses on investments
and changes in net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives.
The impact of realized gains and losses on investments and unrealized gains and losses on
derivatives also includes adjustments for taxes and that portion of amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, unearned revenue reserve and value of insurance in
force acquired attributable to such gains or losses. Our rationale for using operating income, in
addition to net income (loss), to measure our performance is summarized in Note 9 to the
consolidated financial statements.
33
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Pre-tax Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to FBL Financial Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
(1,490 |
) |
|
$ |
6,438 |
|
Net impact of operating income adjustments (1) |
|
|
9,358 |
|
|
|
8,630 |
|
Income taxes on operating income |
|
|
3,821 |
|
|
|
7,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
$ |
11,689 |
|
|
$ |
22,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income (loss) by segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Annuity Exclusive Distribution |
|
$ |
6,826 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
7,795 |
|
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance |
|
|
15,443 |
|
|
|
8,164 |
|
Variable |
|
|
(3,825 |
) |
|
|
1,168 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(6,628 |
) |
|
|
(2,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,689 |
|
|
$ |
22,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Net Income (Loss) Attributable to FBL Financial Group, Inc. above for additional details
on our operating income adjustments. |
A discussion of our operating results, by segment, follows:
Traditional
Annuity Exclusive Distribution Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product charges and other |
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
291 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
37,669 |
|
|
|
35,538 |
|
Derivative loss |
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,660 |
|
|
|
35,696 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
29,834 |
|
|
|
28,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
$ |
6,826 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity premiums collected, direct |
|
$ |
96,368 |
|
|
$ |
45,348 |
|
Policy liabilities and accruals, end of period |
|
|
2,408,797 |
|
|
|
2,237,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual deferred annuity spread: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on cash and invested assets |
|
|
6.11 |
% |
|
|
6.19 |
% |
Weighted average interest crediting rate/index cost |
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual traditional annuity withdrawal rate |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Pre-tax operating income for the Exclusive Annuity segment decreased 5.7% in the first quarter of
2009 to $6.8 million due primarily to an increase in benefits and expenses, partially offset by an
increase in spreads earned and the impact of growth in the volume of business in force. Benefits
and expenses increased due to a $1.6 million increase in amortization of deferred policy costs
primarily due to changes in earned rates and expected profits on the underlying business.
34
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Premiums collected increased 112.5% in the 2009 period to $96.3 million. The amount of traditional
annuity premiums collected is highly dependent upon the relationship between the current crediting
rates on our products and the crediting rates available on competing products, including
bank-offered certificates of deposit. We believe the increase in annuity premiums in 2009 is due
to lower short-term market interest rates making certificates of deposit and other short-term
investments less attractive in relation to these traditional annuities.
The change in the weighted average yield on cash and invested assets is primarily attributable to
the impact of our interest rate swap program, partially offset by an increase in yields on new
investments. Operating income for the quarter includes losses from our swaps which totaled ($1.2)
million in 2009 compared to ($0.1) million in 2008. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial
statements for additional details on our interest rate swaps. The weighted average interest
crediting rate decreased due to decreases in the interest crediting rates on a significant portion
of our annuity portfolio during 2008 due to the decline in the portfolio yield. Contributing to
the decrease in the weighted average crediting rate is a shift of business to a new money product
that has a short guaranteed interest period and lower crediting rate.
Traditional Annuity Independent Distribution Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive and index product charges |
|
$ |
16,892 |
|
|
$ |
5,309 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
104,705 |
|
|
|
90,766 |
|
Derivative loss |
|
|
(30,464 |
) |
|
|
(17,793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,133 |
|
|
|
78,282 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
91,260 |
|
|
|
70,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
$ |
(127 |
) |
|
$ |
7,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity premiums collected, independent channel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate annuities |
|
$ |
213,332 |
|
|
$ |
120,928 |
|
Index annuities |
|
|
111,367 |
|
|
|
205,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total annuity premiums collected, independent channel |
|
|
324,699 |
|
|
|
326,686 |
|
Annuity premiums collected, assumed |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
Policy liabilities and accruals, end of period |
|
|
7,638,876 |
|
|
|
6,980,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual deferred annuity spread: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on cash and invested assets |
|
|
6.10 |
% |
|
|
6.01 |
% |
Weighted average interest crediting rate/index cost |
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread |
|
|
2.17 |
% |
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual traditional annuity withdrawal rate |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Pre-tax operating income (loss) for the Independent Annuity segment totaled ($0.1) million in the
2009 period and $7.8 million in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to the impact of increased
surrender activity from the EquiTrust Life independent distribution channel and a decrease in
spreads earned, partially offset by the impact of an increase in the volume of business in force.
The volume of business in force increased due to sales of our EquiTrust Life independent
distribution business during 2008. The average aggregate account value for annuity contracts in
force in the Independent Annuity segment totaled $7,623.3 million for the 2009 period and $6,789.8
million for the 2008 period.
The increase in interest sensitive and index product charges is due to an increase in surrender
charges. Surrender charges increased due to an increase in surrenders and withdrawals relating to
the impact of market value adjustments on our direct fixed annuity products and growth in the
volume and aging of business in force. In 2009,
35
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
gross surrender charges were partially offset by
the impact of the MVA feature. This activity caused increased
withdrawal rates. See additional details on the impact of the MVA under Premiums and Product
Charges above and the Liquidity and Capital Resources section that follows.
The increase in net investment income is attributable to growth in invested assets due to net
premium inflows and an increase in the weighted average yield earned. Net investment income for
the three-month period also includes $0.8 million in 2009 and $0.3 million in 2008 in fee income
from bond calls, tender offers and mortgage loan prepayments and the change of net discount
accretion on mortgage and asset-backed securities. The increase in derivative loss is primarily
due to a decrease in proceeds from call option settlements. Call option settlements in 2009
totaled $0.2 million for the first quarter of 2009 and $14.3 million for the 2008 period.
Benefits and expenses for the 2009 period increased due to growth in the volume of business in
force and an increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition cost and deferred sales
inducements, partially offset by a reduction in index credits. In addition to the impact of
additional business in force, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales
inducements increased approximately $17.0 million due to the impact of the increased surrender
activity from the independent distribution channel. Index credits totaled $1.3 million in the
first quarter of 2009, compared to $14.5 million in the 2008 period due to less appreciation in the
underlying market indices.
The weighted average yield increased due to the items impacting net investment income described
above. The decrease in spread is primarily due to a shift in business to our multi-year guaranteed
annuity which has a lower spread target than other products in our portfolio. In addition, we
retained higher amounts of liquid assets and incurred additional costs from being in an overhedged
position due to the increase in surrender activity, which further reduced our spreads.
36
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Traditional and Universal Life Insurance Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive product charges |
|
$ |
12,126 |
|
|
$ |
11,421 |
|
Traditional life insurance premiums and other income |
|
|
37,954 |
|
|
|
36,133 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
35,991 |
|
|
|
35,787 |
|
Other income |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,132 |
|
|
|
83,362 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
70,689 |
|
|
|
75,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income |
|
$ |
15,443 |
|
|
$ |
8,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life premiums collected, net of reinsurance |
|
$ |
52,367 |
|
|
$ |
49,994 |
|
Policy liabilities and accruals, end of period |
|
|
2,237,867 |
|
|
|
2,184,452 |
|
Direct life insurance in force, end of period (in millions) |
|
|
36,378 |
|
|
|
33,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive life insurance spread: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield on cash and invested assets |
|
|
6.65 |
% |
|
|
6.55 |
% |
Weighted average interest crediting rate |
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread |
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income for the Traditional and Universal Life Insurance segment increased 89.2%
in the 2009 period to $15.4 million. The increase in the 2009 period is primarily due to lower
death benefits, an increase in traditional life insurance premiums and a decrease in traditional
life future policy benefits.
Death benefits incurred for the first quarter of 2009 decreased 14.0% to $22.1 million, due to
fewer traditional life death claims reported, partially offset by an increase in the amount of
universal life claims. Traditional life insurance premiums increased primarily due to sales of
life products by our Farm Bureau Life agency force. Traditional life future policy benefits in the
first quarter of 2009 increased $1.7 million less than the 2008 period primarily due to changes in
reserve estimates which increased term life reserves $1.6 million in 2008.
The change in spreads is primarily due to an increase in the weighted average yield on cash and
invested assets, which is primarily attributable to an increase in yields earned on new investments
and the change of net discount accretion on mortgage and asset-backed securities. In addition, we
lowered the crediting rate on certain universal life products during the first quarter of 2009.
37
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Variable Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitive product charges |
|
$ |
11,928 |
|
|
$ |
12,211 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
3,891 |
|
|
|
3,341 |
|
Other income |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,145 |
|
|
|
15,935 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
19,970 |
|
|
|
14,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,825 |
) |
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable premiums collected, net of reinsurance |
|
$ |
26,180 |
|
|
$ |
41,921 |
|
Policy liabilities and accruals, end of period |
|
|
262,758 |
|
|
|
233,561 |
|
Separate account assets, end of period |
|
|
522,591 |
|
|
|
802,225 |
|
Direct life insurance in force, end of period (in millions) |
|
|
7,614 |
|
|
|
7,804 |
|
Pre-tax operating income (loss) for the Variable segment decreased to ($3.8) million in the first
quarter of 2009 from $1.2 million for the 2008 period, primarily due to an increase in deferred
acquisition cost amortization and an increase in death benefits.
Benefits and expenses increased 35.2% to $20.0 million in the first quarter of 2009 primarily due
to a $3.0 million increase in deferred acquisition cost amortization resulting from the impact of
negative separate account performance. In addition, death benefits increased $1.8 million,
primarily due to an increase in the severity of variable universal life claims.
Variable premiums tend to vary with the volatility, performance of and confidence level in the
equity markets as well as crediting and interest rates on competing products, including fixed rate
annuities and bank-offered certificates of deposit.
Corporate and Other Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax operating loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
1,813 |
|
|
$ |
3,062 |
|
Derivative loss |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,598 |
|
|
|
8,497 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
4,451 |
|
Benefits and other expenses |
|
|
5,443 |
|
|
|
6,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,777 |
) |
|
|
(2,323 |
) |
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Equity income, before tax |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating loss |
|
$ |
(6,628 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating loss increased 210.6% to $6.6 million, primarily due to an increase in interest
expense and a decrease in net investment income. Interest expense increased in the 2009 period due
to an increase in our average debt outstanding resulting from additional debt borrowings. Net
investment income decreased primarily due to a decrease in short-term interest rates and our desire
to maintain a more liquid portfolio in 2009. Derivative loss includes $0.4 million of net interest
expense on the interest rate swap purchased to hedge our previously outstanding line of credit.
See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on this interest
rate
38
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
swap. The changes in other income and expense are primarily due to operating results of our
non-insurances subsidiaries.
Financial Condition
Investments
Our total investment portfolio increased 0.2% to $10,875.1 million at March 31, 2009 compared to
$10,854.1 million at December 31, 2008. This increase is primarily the result of net cash received
from interest sensitive and index products, partially offset by the payoff of our line of credit
and write-downs for impairments of fixed maturity securities. Net unrealized depreciation of fixed
maturity securities increased $32.1 million during 2009 to a net unrealized loss of $1,571.8
million at March 31, 2009. This increase is principally due to the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2,
which increased unrealized losses $37.1 million in 2009. Our unrealized loss position remains high
due to wide credit spreads primarily due to the continued deterioration of the U.S. housing market,
tightened lending conditions and decreased liquidity in the market. In addition, there is a severe
global recession which has caused significant market strain. Steps taken by the government to
stabilize the financial system are slow to have a meaningful impact and pressures on the financial
system continued during the first quarter of 2009. Details regarding the investment impairments
are discussed above in the Realized Losses on Investments section under Results of Operations.
Additional details regarding securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2009 are
included in the discussion that follows and in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
Internal investment professionals manage our investment portfolio. The investment strategy is
designed to achieve superior risk-adjusted returns consistent with the investment philosophy of
maintaining a largely investment grade portfolio and providing adequate liquidity for obligations
to policyholders and other requirements.
Investment Portfolio Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed maturities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public |
|
$ |
7,357,009 |
|
|
|
67.7 |
% |
|
$ |
7,406,964 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
% |
144A private placement |
|
|
1,131,776 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
1,164,417 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Private placement |
|
|
392,741 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
394,062 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities available
for sale |
|
|
8,881,526 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
8,965,443 |
|
|
|
82.6 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
44,953 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
44,863 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
1,362,146 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
15,755 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Investment real estate |
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
Policy loans |
|
|
183,423 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
182,421 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
383,183 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
262,459 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
10,875,126 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
10,854,059 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, 94.9% (based on carrying value) of the available-for-sale fixed maturity
securities were investment grade debt securities, defined as being in the highest two National
Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) designations. Non-investment grade debt securities
generally provide higher yields and involve greater risks than investment grade debt securities
because their issuers typically are more highly leveraged and more vulnerable to adverse economic
conditions than investment grade issuers. In addition, the trading market for these securities is
usually more limited than for investment grade debt securities. We regularly review the percentage
of our portfolio that is invested in non-investment grade debt securities (NAIC designations 3
through 6). As of March 31, 2009, the investment in non-investment grade debt was 5.1% of
available-for-sale fixed maturity securities. At that time, no single non-investment grade holding
exceeded 0.2% of total investments.
39
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Credit Quality by NAIC Designation and Standard & Poors (S&P) Rating Equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
NAIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designation |
|
Equivalent S&P Ratings (1) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
AAA, AA, A |
|
$ |
5,225,104 |
|
|
|
58.8 |
% |
|
$ |
5,382,110 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
% |
2 |
|
BBB |
|
|
3,201,705 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
3,243,034 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
8,426,809 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
8,625,144 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
|
3 |
|
BB |
|
|
301,786 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
244,814 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
4 |
|
B |
|
|
109,322 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
40,565 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
5 |
|
CCC, CC, C |
|
|
19,950 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
43,064 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
6 |
|
In or near default |
|
|
23,659 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
11,856 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total below investment grade |
|
|
454,717 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
340,299 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities available for sale |
|
$ |
8,881,526 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Securities Valuation Office of the NAIC generally rates private placement
securities. Comparisons between NAIC designations and S&P ratings are published by the
NAIC. S&P has not rated some of the fixed maturity securities in our portfolio. |
Gross Unrealized Gains and Gross Unrealized Losses by Internal Industry Classification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
with Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
with Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services |
|
$ |
1,173,730 |
|
|
$ |
66,972 |
|
|
$ |
3,196 |
|
|
$ |
1,106,758 |
|
|
$ |
(599,818 |
) |
Manufacturing |
|
|
1,204,731 |
|
|
|
387,324 |
|
|
|
12,373 |
|
|
|
817,407 |
|
|
|
(181,596 |
) |
Mining |
|
|
506,440 |
|
|
|
65,679 |
|
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
440,761 |
|
|
|
(70,819 |
) |
Retail trade |
|
|
96,277 |
|
|
|
27,052 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
69,225 |
|
|
|
(19,928 |
) |
Services |
|
|
181,521 |
|
|
|
33,632 |
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
147,889 |
|
|
|
(26,428 |
) |
Transportation |
|
|
170,589 |
|
|
|
43,312 |
|
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
127,277 |
|
|
|
(22,366 |
) |
Utilities |
|
|
1,270,018 |
|
|
|
267,065 |
|
|
|
11,149 |
|
|
|
1,002,953 |
|
|
|
(120,234 |
) |
Other |
|
|
161,087 |
|
|
|
37,872 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
123,215 |
|
|
|
(18,785 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate securities |
|
|
4,764,393 |
|
|
|
928,908 |
|
|
|
37,643 |
|
|
|
3,835,485 |
|
|
|
(1,059,974 |
) |
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
2,566,904 |
|
|
|
1,033,534 |
|
|
|
57,771 |
|
|
|
1,533,370 |
|
|
|
(476,785 |
) |
United States Government and agencies |
|
|
267,362 |
|
|
|
267,362 |
|
|
|
12,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State, municipal and other governments |
|
|
1,282,867 |
|
|
|
156,471 |
|
|
|
5,572 |
|
|
|
1,126,396 |
|
|
|
(148,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,881,526 |
|
|
$ |
2,386,275 |
|
|
$ |
113,391 |
|
|
$ |
6,495,251 |
|
|
$ |
(1,685,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
with Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services |
|
$ |
1,246,895 |
|
|
$ |
114,067 |
|
|
$ |
4,806 |
|
|
$ |
1,132,828 |
|
|
$ |
(547,594 |
) |
Manufacturing |
|
|
1,211,102 |
|
|
|
289,093 |
|
|
|
11,187 |
|
|
|
922,009 |
|
|
|
(183,439 |
) |
Mining |
|
|
469,935 |
|
|
|
24,521 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
445,414 |
|
|
|
(73,562 |
) |
Retail trade |
|
|
104,379 |
|
|
|
24,170 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
80,209 |
|
|
|
(16,819 |
) |
Services |
|
|
184,528 |
|
|
|
42,850 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
141,678 |
|
|
|
(28,796 |
) |
Transportation |
|
|
177,844 |
|
|
|
52,034 |
|
|
|
6,849 |
|
|
|
125,810 |
|
|
|
(20,253 |
) |
Utilities |
|
|
1,279,641 |
|
|
|
299,537 |
|
|
|
16,623 |
|
|
|
980,104 |
|
|
|
(135,654 |
) |
Other |
|
|
159,831 |
|
|
|
52,252 |
|
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
107,579 |
|
|
|
(21,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate securities |
|
|
4,834,155 |
|
|
|
898,524 |
|
|
|
46,177 |
|
|
|
3,935,631 |
|
|
|
(1,027,392 |
) |
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
2,569,769 |
|
|
|
975,193 |
|
|
|
46,573 |
|
|
|
1,594,576 |
|
|
|
(478,994 |
) |
United States Government and agencies |
|
|
250,893 |
|
|
|
217,379 |
|
|
|
12,891 |
|
|
|
33,514 |
|
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
State, municipal and other governments |
|
|
1,310,626 |
|
|
|
142,107 |
|
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
1,168,519 |
|
|
|
(139,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,965,443 |
|
|
$ |
2,233,203 |
|
|
$ |
110,206 |
|
|
$ |
6,732,240 |
|
|
$ |
(1,649,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality of Available-for-Sale Fixed Maturity Securities with Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
NAIC |
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Designation |
|
Equivalent S&P Ratings |
|
Losses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
1 |
|
AAA, AA, A |
|
$ |
3,303,926 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
% |
|
$ |
(683,021 |
) |
|
|
40.5 |
% |
2 |
|
BBB |
|
|
2,778,251 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
(671,884 |
) |
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
6,082,177 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
(1,354,905 |
) |
|
|
80.4 |
|
3 |
|
BB |
|
|
268,052 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(109,755 |
) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
4 |
|
B |
|
|
103,881 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(128,109 |
) |
|
|
7.6 |
|
5 |
|
CCC, CC, C |
|
|
19,949 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(27,068 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
6 |
|
In or near default |
|
|
21,192 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(65,334 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total below investment grade |
|
|
413,074 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(330,266 |
) |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,495,251 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,685,171 |
) |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
NAIC |
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Designation |
|
Equivalent S&P Ratings |
|
Losses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
1 |
|
AAA, AA, A |
|
$ |
3,545,103 |
|
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
$ |
(740,675 |
) |
|
|
44.9 |
% |
2 |
|
BBB |
|
|
2,890,656 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
(738,512 |
) |
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
6,435,759 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
|
|
|
(1,479,187 |
) |
|
|
89.7 |
|
3 |
|
BB |
|
|
212,438 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(70,545 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
|
4 |
|
B |
|
|
37,399 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(45,228 |
) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
5 |
|
CCC, CC, C |
|
|
40,308 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(47,615 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
6 |
|
In or near default |
|
|
6,336 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(7,272 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total below investment grade |
|
|
296,481 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(170,660 |
) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,732,240 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,649,847 |
) |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale Fixed Maturity Securities with Unrealized Losses by Length of Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Market Value is |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Market Value is |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
is Less than |
|
|
75% or Greater |
|
|
is Less than |
|
|
75% or Greater |
|
|
|
Issuers |
|
|
75% of Cost |
|
|
than Cost |
|
|
75% of Cost |
|
|
than Cost |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
71 |
|
|
$ |
29,862 |
|
|
$ |
336,171 |
|
|
$ |
(12,625 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,901 |
) |
Greater than three months to six months |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
39,823 |
|
|
|
608,734 |
|
|
|
(15,066 |
) |
|
|
(47,324 |
) |
Greater than six months to nine months. |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
55,024 |
|
|
|
844,273 |
|
|
|
(17,946 |
) |
|
|
(72,836 |
) |
Greater than nine months to twelve
months |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
192,425 |
|
|
|
1,040,536 |
|
|
|
(61,577 |
) |
|
|
(99,140 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
2,030,508 |
|
|
|
3,003,066 |
|
|
|
(945,554 |
) |
|
|
(387,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,347,642 |
|
|
$ |
5,832,780 |
|
|
$ |
(1,052,768 |
) |
|
$ |
(632,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Market Value is |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Market Value is |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
is Less than |
|
|
75% or Greater |
|
|
is Less than |
|
|
75% or Greater |
|
|
|
of Issuers |
|
|
75% of Cost |
|
|
than Cost |
|
|
75% of Cost |
|
|
than Cost |
|
Three months or less |
|
|
170 |
|
|
$ |
31,774 |
|
|
$ |
784,689 |
|
|
$ |
(12,658 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,824 |
) |
Greater than three months to six months |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
75,356 |
|
|
|
1,024,158 |
|
|
|
(28,791 |
) |
|
|
(82,320 |
) |
Greater than six months to nine months |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
182,184 |
|
|
|
1,140,978 |
|
|
|
(56,719 |
) |
|
|
(111,013 |
) |
Greater than nine months to twelve
months |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
288,140 |
|
|
|
780,947 |
|
|
|
(103,539 |
) |
|
|
(97,928 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
1,733,949 |
|
|
|
2,339,912 |
|
|
|
(785,180 |
) |
|
|
(319,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,311,403 |
|
|
$ |
6,070,684 |
|
|
$ |
(986,887 |
) |
|
$ |
(662,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Available-For-Sale Fixed Maturity Securities with Unrealized Losses by Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Securities with |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
28,111 |
|
|
$ |
(6,083 |
) |
|
$ |
43,483 |
|
|
$ |
(4,985 |
) |
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
725,000 |
|
|
|
(138,502 |
) |
|
|
791,636 |
|
|
|
(143,559 |
) |
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
2,000,092 |
|
|
|
(482,198 |
) |
|
|
2,037,451 |
|
|
|
(514,869 |
) |
Due after ten years |
|
|
2,204,590 |
|
|
|
(580,691 |
) |
|
|
2,260,568 |
|
|
|
(506,966 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,957,793 |
|
|
|
(1,207,474 |
) |
|
|
5,133,138 |
|
|
|
(1,170,379 |
) |
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,533,370 |
|
|
|
(476,785 |
) |
|
|
1,594,576 |
|
|
|
(478,994 |
) |
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,495,251 |
|
|
$ |
(1,685,171 |
) |
|
$ |
6,732,240 |
|
|
$ |
(1,649,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2009, unrealized losses on available-for-sale fixed maturity securities totaled
$1,685.2 million primarily due to $1,060.0 million in unrealized losses on corporate securities.
The unrealized losses on corporate securities were primarily due to:
|
|
|
increased credit spreads on commercial real estate investment trust bonds, due to the
underlying real estate exposure and market concerns about the ability to access capital
markets, |
|
|
|
|
increased credit spreads and defaults in collateralized debt obligations, |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in market liquidity and credit quality concerns of assets held by banking
institutions and |
|
|
|
|
increased credit spreads from weaker operating results in the manufacturing sector. |
In addition, the unrealized losses on mortgage and asset-backed securities totaling $476.8 million
were primarily due an increase in credit spreads and decrease in market liquidity resulting from
concerns about mortgage defaults on subprime and other risky mortgages and potential downgrades or
defaults of monoline bond insurers. We do not intend to sell or believe we will be required to
sell these investments before their anticipated recovery, which may be maturity, therefore we do
not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009. See Note 2
to our consolidated financial statements for additional analysis of these unrealized losses.
Mortgage and Asset-Backed Securities
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities comprised 28.9% at March 31, 2009 and 28.7% at December
31, 2008 of our total available-for-sale fixed maturity securities. These securities are purchased
when we believe these types of investments provide superior risk-adjusted returns compared to
returns of more conventional investments such as corporate bonds and mortgage loans. These
securities are diversified as to collateral types, cash flow characteristics and maturity.
The repayment pattern on mortgage and other asset-backed securities is more variable than that of
more traditional fixed maturity securities because the repayment terms are tied to underlying debt
obligations that are subject to prepayments. The prepayment speeds (e.g., the rate of individuals
refinancing their home mortgages) can vary based on a number of economic factors that cannot be
predicted with certainty. These factors include the prevailing interest rate environment and
general status of the economy.
At each balance sheet date, we review and update our expectation of future prepayment speeds and
the book value of the mortgage and other asset-backed securities purchased at a premium or discount
is reset, if needed, to result in a constant effective yield over the life of the security. This
effective yield is computed using historical principal payments and expected future principal
payment patterns. Any adjustments to book value to derive the constant effective yield, which may
include the reversal of premium or discount amounts previously amortized or accrued, are recorded
in the current period as a component of net investment income. Accordingly, deviations in actual
prepayment speeds from that originally expected or changes in expected prepayment speeds can cause
a change in the yield earned on mortgage and asset-backed securities purchased at a premium or
discount and may result in adjustments that have a material positive or negative impact on
quarterly reported results. Increases in prepayment
43
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
speeds, which typically occur in a decreasing
interest rate environment, generally increase the rate at which discount
is accrued and premium is amortized into income. Decreases in prepayment speeds, which typically
occur in an increasing interest rate environment, generally slow down the rate these amounts are
recorded into income.
Mortgage and Asset-Backed Securities by Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Percent of Fixed |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequential |
|
$ |
1,211,633 |
|
|
$ |
1,237,379 |
|
|
$ |
1,077,966 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
Pass-through |
|
|
208,285 |
|
|
|
208,679 |
|
|
|
216,902 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Planned and targeted amortization class |
|
|
499,657 |
|
|
|
505,375 |
|
|
|
463,132 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
39,990 |
|
|
|
40,072 |
|
|
|
32,268 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,959,565 |
|
|
|
1,991,505 |
|
|
|
1,790,268 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
807,520 |
|
|
|
827,065 |
|
|
|
655,011 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
218,833 |
|
|
|
263,951 |
|
|
|
121,625 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
$ |
2,985,918 |
|
|
$ |
3,082,521 |
|
|
$ |
2,566,904 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Percent of Fixed |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequential |
|
$ |
1,237,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,264,691 |
|
|
$ |
1,068,869 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
Pass-through |
|
|
219,447 |
|
|
|
219,855 |
|
|
|
225,513 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Planned and targeted amortization class |
|
|
508,133 |
|
|
|
513,373 |
|
|
|
464,296 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
40,086 |
|
|
|
40,184 |
|
|
|
31,011 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,004,701 |
|
|
|
2,038,103 |
|
|
|
1,789,689 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
799,546 |
|
|
|
819,030 |
|
|
|
640,236 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
197,943 |
|
|
|
265,435 |
|
|
|
139,844 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
$ |
3,002,190 |
|
|
$ |
3,122,568 |
|
|
$ |
2,569,769 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The residential mortgage-backed portfolio includes pass-through and collateralized mortgage
obligation (CMO) securities. With a pass-through security, we receive a pro rata share of
principal payments as payments are made on the underlying mortgage loans. CMOs consist of pools of
mortgages divided into sections or tranches which provide sequential retirement of the bonds. We
invest in sequential tranches which provide cash flow stability in that principal payments do not
occur until the previous tranches are paid off. In addition, to provide call protection and more
stable average lives, we invest in CMOs such as planned amortization class (PAC) and targeted
amortization class (TAC) securities. CMOs of these types provide more predictable cash flows
within a range of prepayment speeds by shifting the prepayment risks to support tranches. We
generally do not purchase certain types of CMOs that we believe would subject the investment
portfolio to greater than average risk. These include, but are not limited to, principal only,
floater, inverse floater, PAC II and support tranches.
The commercial and other asset-backed securities are primarily sequential securities. Commercial
mortgage-backed securities typically have cash flows that are less sensitive to interest rate
changes than residential securities of similar types due principally to prepayment restrictions on
many of the underlying commercial mortgage loans. The other asset-backed securities, whose
collateral is primarily second lien, fixed rate home-equity loans, are also less sensitive to
interest rate changes due to the borrowers typically having less ability to refinance as compared
to homeowners with a first lien mortgage only.
Our direct exposure to the Alt-A home equity and subprime first-lien loan sectors is limited to
investments in structured securities collateralized by senior tranches of residential mortgage
loans with this exposure. We do not own any direct investments in subprime lenders or adjustable
rate mortgages.
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Mortgage and Asset-Backed Securities by Collateral Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
of Fixed |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
of Fixed |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Government agency |
|
$ |
544,588 |
|
|
$ |
577,895 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
$ |
557,311 |
|
|
$ |
579,489 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
Prime |
|
|
1,038,351 |
|
|
|
908,382 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
1,068,716 |
|
|
|
913,772 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Alt-A |
|
|
544,394 |
|
|
|
389,453 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
524,264 |
|
|
|
397,556 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
30,130 |
|
|
|
20,865 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
30,133 |
|
|
|
20,311 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
807,520 |
|
|
|
655,011 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
799,546 |
|
|
|
640,236 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Non-mortgage |
|
|
20,935 |
|
|
|
15,298 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
22,220 |
|
|
|
18,405 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,985,918 |
|
|
$ |
2,566,904 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
$ |
3,002,190 |
|
|
$ |
2,569,769 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The mortgage and asset-backed securities can be summarized into three broad categories:
residential, commercial and other asset-backed securities.
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities by Collateral Type and Origination Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Government & Prime |
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
62,191 |
|
|
$ |
67,812 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
62,191 |
|
|
$ |
67,812 |
|
2007 |
|
|
115,796 |
|
|
|
113,655 |
|
|
|
59,714 |
|
|
|
34,486 |
|
|
|
175,510 |
|
|
|
148,141 |
|
2006 |
|
|
114,787 |
|
|
|
101,713 |
|
|
|
22,437 |
|
|
|
13,782 |
|
|
|
137,224 |
|
|
|
115,495 |
|
2005 |
|
|
27,734 |
|
|
|
27,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,734 |
|
|
|
27,871 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
1,239,551 |
|
|
|
1,167,310 |
|
|
|
317,355 |
|
|
|
263,639 |
|
|
|
1,556,906 |
|
|
|
1,430,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,560,059 |
|
|
$ |
1,478,361 |
|
|
$ |
399,506 |
|
|
$ |
311,907 |
|
|
$ |
1,959,565 |
|
|
$ |
1,790,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Government & Prime |
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
63,195 |
|
|
$ |
67,391 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,195 |
|
|
$ |
67,391 |
|
2007 |
|
|
120,089 |
|
|
|
117,851 |
|
|
|
60,265 |
|
|
|
32,723 |
|
|
|
180,354 |
|
|
|
150,574 |
|
2006 |
|
|
117,671 |
|
|
|
106,016 |
|
|
|
22,436 |
|
|
|
11,099 |
|
|
|
140,107 |
|
|
|
117,115 |
|
2005 |
|
|
28,517 |
|
|
|
27,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,517 |
|
|
|
27,581 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
1,273,488 |
|
|
|
1,162,275 |
|
|
|
319,040 |
|
|
|
264,753 |
|
|
|
1,592,528 |
|
|
|
1,427,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,602,960 |
|
|
$ |
1,481,114 |
|
|
$ |
401,741 |
|
|
$ |
308,575 |
|
|
$ |
2,004,701 |
|
|
$ |
1,789,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Insurance on 2006 Alt-A issues is provided by MBIA Insurance Corporation (78% in 2009 and
2008). Insurance on 2007 Alt-A issues is provided by Assured Guaranty Ltd. (33% in 2009 and
32% in 2008) and MBIA Insurance Corporation (25% in 2009 and 2008). There is no insurance
coverage on Government & Prime investments or Alt-A investments with collateral originating
prior to 2006. |
45
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities by Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
1,679,076 |
|
|
|
93.8 |
% |
|
$ |
1,721,046 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
% |
AA |
|
|
41,935 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3,462 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
A |
|
|
21,096 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
24,121 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
BBB |
|
|
6,285 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
7,281 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
BB |
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
17,326 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
B |
|
|
22,599 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
16,453 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
CCC |
|
|
16,073 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,790,268 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,789,689 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities by Origination Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
197,863 |
|
|
$ |
200,234 |
|
|
$ |
197,725 |
|
|
$ |
196,908 |
|
2007 |
|
|
194,184 |
|
|
|
115,061 |
|
|
|
194,169 |
|
|
|
114,816 |
|
2006 |
|
|
170,463 |
|
|
|
117,439 |
|
|
|
170,452 |
|
|
|
117,606 |
|
2005 |
|
|
56,614 |
|
|
|
41,436 |
|
|
|
56,220 |
|
|
|
41,877 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
188,396 |
|
|
|
180,841 |
|
|
|
180,980 |
|
|
|
169,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
807,520 |
|
|
$ |
655,011 |
|
|
$ |
799,546 |
|
|
$ |
640,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities by Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
GNMA |
|
$ |
391,451 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
% |
|
$ |
386,634 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
% |
FNMA |
|
|
15,763 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
15,611 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
AAA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generic AAA |
|
|
15,353 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Super Senior AAA |
|
|
102,376 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
103,951 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
Mezzanine AAA |
|
|
61,209 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
62,823 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
Junior AAA |
|
|
29,377 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
41,662 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AAA |
|
|
208,315 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
209,610 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA |
|
|
21,473 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
14,682 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
A |
|
|
9,914 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
BBB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,349 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
B |
|
|
7,735 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCC |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
655,011 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
640,236 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae), guarantees principal and interest on
mortgage backed securities. The guarantee is backed by the full faith and credit of the United
States Government. The Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA or Fannie Mae) and the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Association (FHLMC or Freddie Mac), are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)
that were chartered by Congress to reduce borrowing costs for certain homeowners. GSEs have
carried an implicit backing of the U.S. Government but do not have explicit guarantees like GNMA.
The Housing and Economic Recovery act of 2008 allows the government to
expand its line of credit to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and gives the U.S. Treasury the power to
purchase an equity stake in the firms through the end of 2009.
46
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
The AAA rated commercial mortgage-backed securities are broken down into categories based on
subordination levels. Rating agencies disclose subordination levels, which measure of the amount
of credit support that the bonds (or tranches) have from subordinated bonds (or tranches). Generic
AAA is a term used for securities issued prior to 2005. The super senior securities have
subordination levels greater than 27%, the mezzanine securities have subordination levels in the
17-27% range and the junior securities have subordination levels in the 9-17% range.
Other Asset-Backed Securities by Collateral Type and Origination Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Government & Prime |
|
Alt-A |
|
Subprime |
|
Non-Mortgage |
|
Total |
|
|
Amortized Cost (1) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Amortized Cost (1) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Amortized Cost (1) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
2007 |
|
$ |
9,987 |
|
|
$ |
1,310 |
|
|
$ |
20,050 |
|
|
$ |
6,159 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,084 |
|
|
$ |
3,730 |
|
|
$ |
37,121 |
|
|
$ |
11,199 |
|
2006 |
|
|
9,731 |
|
|
|
3,367 |
|
|
|
86,592 |
|
|
|
42,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,323 |
|
|
|
46,032 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,651 |
|
|
|
22,036 |
|
|
|
30,130 |
|
|
|
20,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,781 |
|
|
|
42,901 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
3,162 |
|
|
|
3,239 |
|
|
|
11,595 |
|
|
|
6,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,851 |
|
|
|
11,568 |
|
|
|
28,608 |
|
|
|
21,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,880 |
|
|
$ |
7,916 |
|
|
$ |
144,888 |
|
|
$ |
77,546 |
|
|
$ |
30,130 |
|
|
$ |
20,865 |
|
|
$ |
20,935 |
|
|
$ |
15,298 |
|
|
$ |
218,833 |
|
|
$ |
121,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Government & Prime |
|
Alt-A |
|
Subprime |
|
Non-Mortgage |
|
Total |
|
|
Amortized Cost (1) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Amortized Cost (1) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Amortized Cost (1) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
2007 |
|
$ |
9,989 |
|
|
$ |
2,820 |
|
|
$ |
17,442 |
|
|
$ |
9,140 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,091 |
|
|
$ |
4,465 |
|
|
$ |
34,522 |
|
|
$ |
16,425 |
|
2006 |
|
|
9,726 |
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
66,826 |
|
|
|
45,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,552 |
|
|
|
51,706 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,653 |
|
|
|
25,068 |
|
|
|
30,133 |
|
|
|
20,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,786 |
|
|
|
45,379 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
3,352 |
|
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
11,602 |
|
|
|
9,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,129 |
|
|
|
13,940 |
|
|
|
30,083 |
|
|
|
26,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
23,067 |
|
|
$ |
12,147 |
|
|
$ |
122,523 |
|
|
$ |
88,981 |
|
|
$ |
30,133 |
|
|
$ |
20,311 |
|
|
$ |
22,220 |
|
|
$ |
18,405 |
|
|
$ |
197,943 |
|
|
$ |
139,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Insurance on 2006 Alt-A issues is provided by Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. (49% in 2009
and 38% in 2008) and AMBAC Assurance Corporation (27% in 2009 and 34% in 2008). Insurance on
2007 Alt-A issues is provided by AMBAC Assurance Corporation (50% in 2009 and 57% in 2008),
MBIA Insurance Corporation (25% in 2009 and 29% in 2008) and Financial Guaranty Insurance Co.
(25% in 2009 and 14% in 2008). The 2006 and 2007 Government & Prime issues are 100% insured
by AMBAC Assurance Corporation (2006 issues) and MBIA Insurance Corporation (2007 issues).
There is no insurance coverage on other asset-backed securities with non-mortgage collateral
or collateral originating prior to 2006. |
Other Asset-Backed Securities by Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent of Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Percent of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
$ |
49,110 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
% |
|
$ |
59,900 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
% |
AA |
|
|
12,992 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
18,852 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
A |
|
|
9,056 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
3,015 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
BBB |
|
|
25,567 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
36,337 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
BB |
|
|
8,907 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
11,666 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
B |
|
|
8,122 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
CCC |
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
4,894 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
CC |
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
C |
|
|
3,612 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
121,625 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
139,844 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The mortgage and asset-backed portfolios include securities wrapped by monoline bond insurers to
provide additional credit enhancement for the investment. We believe these securities were
underwritten at investment grade levels excluding any credit enhancing protection. At March 31,
2009, the fair value of our insured mortgage and asset-
47
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
backed holdings totaled $72.3 million, or 2.8% of our mortgage and asset-backed portfolios and 0.8%
of our total fixed income portfolio.
We do not consider the investments wrapped by other monoline bond insurers to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009 because we do not have reason to believe that
those guarantees, if needed, will not be honored. In addition, we have the intent and ability to
hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity. We do not directly
own any fixed income or equity investments in monoline bond insurers.
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities and Other Asset-Backed Securities by Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Insurers |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
S&P |
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
Asset- |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
Asset- |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Rating (1) |
|
|
Backed |
|
|
Backed |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Backed |
|
|
Backed |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Insured: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMBAC Assurance
Corporation |
|
A |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,782 |
|
|
$ |
14,782 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,380 |
|
|
$ |
18,380 |
|
Assured Guaranty
Ltd. |
|
AAA |
|
|
9,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,596 |
|
|
|
11,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,608 |
|
Financial Guaranty
Insurance Co. |
|
CCC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,427 |
|
|
|
21,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,239 |
|
|
|
27,239 |
|
MBIA Insurance
Corporation |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
19,180 |
|
|
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
26,484 |
|
|
|
15,762 |
|
|
|
10,558 |
|
|
|
26,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total with insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,776 |
|
|
|
43,513 |
|
|
|
72,289 |
|
|
|
27,370 |
|
|
|
56,177 |
|
|
|
83,547 |
|
Uninsured: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,369 |
|
|
|
187,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,682 |
|
FHLMC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,229 |
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
259,375 |
|
|
|
257,810 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
261,036 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,038 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
131,131 |
|
|
|
130,613 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
130,748 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,186,856 |
|
|
|
74,873 |
|
|
|
1,261,729 |
|
|
|
1,186,215 |
|
|
|
80,306 |
|
|
|
1,266,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,790,268 |
|
|
$ |
121,625 |
|
|
$ |
1,911,893 |
|
|
$ |
1,789,690 |
|
|
$ |
139,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,929,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rating in effect as of March 31, 2009. |
Collateralized Debt Obligations
Collateralized debt obligation investments are included in the corporate securities portfolio. Our
investments in collateralized debt obligations are backed by credit default swaps with no home
equity exposure. These securities had a carrying value of $5.4 million and unrealized loss of
$46.6 million at March 31, 2009 and a carrying value of $7.4 million and unrealized loss of $45.6
million at December 31, 2008. The unrealized loss increased in 2009 primarily due to actual
defaults in the collateral, general spread widening and market concerns of increased defaults in
the future. Our investment professionals have stress tested all of these securities and determined
that future principal losses are not expected based on reasonably adverse conditions. See Note 2
to our consolidated financial statements for additional details on this testing. In addition, we
do not intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell these securities before their
anticipated recovery, which may be maturity; therefore we do not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
State, Municipal and Other Government Securities
State, municipal and other government securities include investments in general obligation,
revenue, military housing and municipal housing bonds. Our investment strategy is to utilize
municipal bonds in addition to corporate
bonds, as we believe they provide additional diversification and have historically low default
rates compared with similarly rated corporate bonds. We evaluate the credit strength of the
underlying issues on both a quantitative and qualitative basis, excluding insurance, prior to
acquisition. The majority of the municipal bonds we hold are investment grade credits without
consideration of insurance. The insolvency of one or more of the credit enhancing entities would
be a meaningful short-term market liquidity event, but would not dramatically increase our
investment portfolios risk profile.
48
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
State, Municipal and Other Government Holdings by Insurance and Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Bonds by |
|
By Underlying |
|
Total Bonds by |
|
By Underlying |
|
|
Uninsured Bonds |
|
Insurer Rating |
|
Issue Rating |
|
Insurer Rating |
|
Issue Rating |
Rating |
|
Carrying Value |
|
% of Total |
|
Carrying Value |
|
% of Total |
|
Carrying Value |
|
% of Total |
|
Carrying Value |
|
% of Total |
|
Carrying Value |
|
% of Total |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
AAA (1) |
|
$ |
149,626 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
% |
|
$ |
192,695 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
342,321 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
|
$ |
149,626 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
AA |
|
|
129,328 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
448,612 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
321,669 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
577,940 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
450,997 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
A |
|
|
15,285 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
315,668 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
359,025 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
330,953 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
360,310 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
BBB |
|
|
27,207 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
4,446 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
42,057 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
31,653 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
69,264 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,372 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,372 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
NR (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,298 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,298 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
321,446 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
961,421 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
961,421 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,282,867 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,268,867 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bonds by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Bonds by |
|
By Underlying |
|
Total Bonds by |
|
By Underlying |
|
|
Uninsured Bonds |
|
Insurer Rating |
|
Issue Rating |
|
Insurer Rating |
|
Issue Rating |
Rating |
|
Carrying Value |
|
% of Total |
|
Carrying Value |
|
% of Total |
|
Carrying Value |
|
% of Total |
|
Carrying Value |
|
% of Total |
|
Carrying Value |
|
% of Total |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
AAA (1) |
|
$ |
166,829 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
% |
|
$ |
198,432 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
$ |
4,850 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
$ |
365,261 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
% |
|
$ |
171,679 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
AA |
|
|
119,324 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
454,193 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
319,786 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
573,517 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
439,110 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
A |
|
|
29,505 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
310,695 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
361,165 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
340,200 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
390,670 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
BBB |
|
|
27,039 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
4,609 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
42,630 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
31,648 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
69,669 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
NR (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,498 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,498 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
342,697 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
967,929 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
967,929 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,310,626 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,310,626 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
AAA uninsured bonds includes $51.5 million in 2009 and $57.7 million in 2008 of bonds with
GNMA and/or FNMA collateral. |
|
(2) |
|
No formal public rating issued. Approximately 62% in 2009 and 58% in 2008 of the non-rated
securities relate to military housing bonds, which we believe have a BBB or above shadow
rating; approximately 26% in 2009 and 29% in 2008 are revenue obligation bonds; and
approximately 12% in 2009 and 13% in 2008 are general obligation bonds. Insurance on these
bonds is provided by AMBAC Assurance Corporation (61% in 2009 and 2008), Financial Security
Assurance, Inc. (16% in 2009 and 2008), National Insurance Corporation (formerly MBIA
Insurance Corporation) (18% in 2009 and 17% in 2008), and Financial Guaranty Insurance Co.
(Reinsured by National Insurance Corporation) (5% in 2009 and 2008). |
Equity Securities
Equity securities totaled $45.0 million at March 31, 2009 and $44.9 million at December 31, 2008.
Gross unrealized gains totaled $3.8 million and gross unrealized losses totaled $20.1 million at
March 31, 2009. At December 31, 2008, gross unrealized gains totaled $4.2 million and gross
unrealized losses totaled $11.3 million on these securities. The unrealized losses in 2009 are
primarily attributable to non-redeemable perpetual preferred securities from issuers in the
financial sector. We believe these losses are due to concerns regarding the quality of the assets
the issuers hold and uncertainty regarding when these securities will be called. These securities
are similar to fixed maturities as they provide periodic cash flows, contain call features and are
similarly rated and priced like long-term callable bonds. We do not intend to sell or believe we
will be required to sell these before their anticipated recovery; therefore, we do not consider
them to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
Mortgage Loans
Mortgage loans totaled $1,362.1 million at March 31, 2009 and $1,381.9 million at December 31,
2008. Our mortgage loans are diversified as to property type, location and loan size, and are
collateralized by the related properties. Mortgages more than 60 days delinquent accounted for
0.9% of the carrying value of the mortgage
49
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
portfolio as of March 31, 2009. The total number of commercial mortgage loans outstanding was 347
at March 31, 2009 and 352 at December 31, 2008. New loans are generally $3 million to $12 million
in size, with an average loan size of $5 million and an average loan term of 10 years. Our
mortgage lending policies establish limits on the amount that can be loaned to one borrower and
require diversification by geographic location and collateral type. The majority of our mortgage
loans amortize principal, with 7.7% that are interest only loans at March 31, 2009. At March 31,
2009, the average loan-to-value of the current outstanding principal balance to the appraised value
at origination was 59% and the weighted average debt service coverage ratio was 1.47.
Mortgage Loans by Collateral Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
Collateral Type |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
463,740 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
$ |
467,942 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
% |
Office |
|
|
452,492 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
466,068 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
413,442 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
418,050 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
32,472 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
29,794 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,362,146 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans by Geographic Location within the United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
Region of the United States |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
South Atlantic |
|
$ |
339,173 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
$ |
341,728 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
% |
East North Central |
|
|
266,989 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
269,876 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
Pacific |
|
|
252,562 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
261,581 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
West North Central |
|
|
170,625 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
172,283 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
Mountain |
|
|
131,282 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
132,649 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
West South Central |
|
|
68,325 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
69,582 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
133,190 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
134,155 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,362,146 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans by Loan-to-Value Ratio (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
0% - 50% |
|
$ |
334,645 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
$ |
330,144 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
50% -60% |
|
|
262,676 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
269,816 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
60% - 70% |
|
|
477,250 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
474,436 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
70% - 80% |
|
|
247,087 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
267,159 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
80% - 90% |
|
|
35,133 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
34,904 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
90% - 100% |
|
|
5,355 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
5,395 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,362,146 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio at origination |
50
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Mortgage Loans by Year of Origination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
204,918 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
$ |
205,925 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
289,684 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
291,261 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
2006 |
|
|
195,881 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
197,153 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
2005 |
|
|
135,466 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
136,753 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
2004 and prior |
|
|
536,197 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
550,762 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,362,146 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,381,854 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is
probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to contractual terms of the
loan agreement. In 2009, we established a valuation allowance for two impaired loans totaling $0.9
million. There was no valuation allowance for mortgage loans at December 31, 2008. At March 31,
2009, we also had two mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure with total outstanding principal
balance of $12.3 million and property appraised value of $14.7 million.
Asset-Liability Management
Our asset-liability management program includes (i) designing and developing products that
encourage persistency and help ensure targeted spreads are earned and, as a result, create a stable
liability structure, and (ii) structuring the investment portfolio with duration and cash flow
characteristics consistent with the duration and cash flow characteristics of our insurance
liabilities. The weighted average life of the fixed maturity and mortgage loan portfolio based on
market values and excluding convertible bonds, was approximately 8.5 years at March 31, 2009 and
8.9 years at December 31, 2008. The effective duration of the fixed maturity and mortgage loan
portfolios backing our annuity products was 6.4 at March 31, 2009 and 6.7 at December 31, 2008.
The effective duration of our annuity liabilities was approximately 7.4 at March 31, 2009 and 7.5
at December 31, 2008.
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments consist primarily of call options supporting our index annuity business net
of collateral received from counterparties totaling $15.8 million at March 31, 2009 and $12.9
million at December 31, 2008.
Collateral Related to Securities Lending and Other Transactions
We participate in a securities lending program whereby certain fixed maturity securities from our
investment portfolio are loaned to other institutions for a short period of time. We require
collateral equal to or greater than 102% of the fair value of the loaned securities and at least
100% collateral be maintained through the period the securities are on loan. The collateral is
invested by the lending agent, in accordance with our guidelines, generating fee income that is
recognized as net investment income over the period the securities are on loan. The collateral is
accounted for as a secured borrowing and is recorded as an asset on our consolidated balance
sheets, with a corresponding liability reflecting our obligation to return this collateral upon the
return of the loaned securities. Securities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets with a
fair value of $38.2 million at March 31, 2009 and $66.4 million at December 31, 2008 were on loan
under the program, and we were liable for cash collateral under our control totaling $39.9 million
at March 31, 2009 and $69.6 million at December 31, 2008. During 2008 we discontinued entering
into any new securities lending agreements and we expect the existing loaned securities to continue
to decrease in 2009 as the underlying collateral matures.
Other Assets
Deferred policy acquisition costs increased 0.7% to $1,375.3 million and deferred sales inducements
increased 2.8% to $431.9 million at March 31, 2009 primarily due to the impact of the change in
unrealized appreciation/ depreciation on fixed maturity securities and the capitalization of costs incurred with new sales,
partially offset by amortization and the impact of the change in net unrealized gains/losses on
derivatives. The impact of the change in
51
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
unrealized appreciation/depreciation on fixed maturity securities increased deferred policy
acquisition costs $421.4 million and deferred sales inducements $152.3 million during 2009. The
impact of the change in net unrealized gain/losses on derivatives decreased deferred policy
acquisition costs $8.7 million and deferred sales inducements $4.8 million during 2009. Assets
held in separate accounts decreased 9.5% to $522.6 million primarily due to unrealized losses on
the underlying investment portfolios.
Liabilities
Policy liabilities and accruals and other policyholders funds decreased 0.1% to $11,923.7 million
at March 31, 2009 primarily due to decreases in interest sensitive and index product reserves as a
result of the increased surrenders from the EquiTrust Life independent distribution, partially
offset by an increase in the volume of business in force for Farm Bureau Life. We also paid off
our $60.0 million line of credit borrowings in the first quarter of 2009, which reduced our
short-term debt. Other liabilities increased 35.9% to $147.6 million primarily due to increases in
insurance suspense account balances relating to new sales that have not been processed.
Stockholders Equity
FBL Financial Group, Inc. stockholders equity increased 5.1% to $271.5 million at March 31, 2009,
compared to $258.4 million at December 31, 2008. This increase is attributable to an increase in
the change in the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on fixed maturity securities, partially
offset by net loss and stockholder dividends.
At March 31, 2009, FBLs common stockholders equity was $268.5 million, or $8.84 per share,
compared to $255.4 million or $8.46 per share at December 31, 2008. Included in stockholders
equity per common share is $21.36 at March 31, 2009 and $21.54 at December 31, 2008 attributable to
accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
During 2009, our operating activities generated cash flows totaling $117.3 million. This is
primarily due to net loss of $1.5 million adjusted for non-cash operating revenues and expenses
netting to $118.8 million. We used cash of $55.8 million in our investing activities during the
2009 period. The primary uses were related to $317.8 million of investment acquisitions, partially
offset by $261.4 million of sales, maturities or the repayment of investments. Our financing
activities used cash of $87.7 million during the 2009 period. The primary uses were $609.0 million
for return of policyholder account balances on interest sensitive and index products and repayment
of the $60.0 million line of credit borrowings, partially offset by sources of $584.6 million from
receipts from interest sensitive and index products credited to policyholder account balances.
Sources and Uses of Capital Resources
Parent company cash inflows from operations consists primarily of (i) dividends from subsidiaries,
if declared and paid, (ii) fees that it charges the various subsidiaries and affiliates for
management of their operations, (iii) expense reimbursements from subsidiaries and affiliates, (iv)
proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options, (v) proceeds from borrowings, (vi) tax
settlements between the parent company and its subsidiaries and (vii) investment income. Revenue
sources for the parent company during the first quarter of 2009 included management fees from
subsidiaries and affiliates of $2.2 million. Cash outflows are principally for salaries, taxes and
other expenses related to providing these management services, dividends on outstanding stock,
interest and principal repayments on our parent company debt and capital contributions to
subsidiaries.
The Life Companies cash inflows consist primarily of premium income, deposits to policyholder
account balances, income from investments, sales, maturities and calls of investments, repayments
of investment principal and proceeds from call option exercises. In addition, EquiTrust Life
historically had received capital contributions from FBL Financial Group, Inc. to help fund its
growth or replenish capital. The Life Companies cash outflows are primarily related to
withdrawals of policyholder account balances, investment purchases, payment of policy acquisition
costs, policyholder benefits, income taxes, dividends and current operating expenses. Life
insurance
52
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
companies generally produce a positive cash flow which may be measured by the degree to which cash
inflows are adequate to meet benefit obligations to policyholders and normal operating expenses as
they are incurred. The remaining cash flow is generally used to increase the asset base to provide
funds to meet the need for future policy benefit payments and for writing new business. The Life
Companies continuing operations and financing activities relating to interest sensitive and index
products provided funds totaling $92.5 million the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $280.4
million for the 2008 period.
EquiTrust Life had net cash outflows totaling $28.8 million in the first quarter of 2009, primarily
due to increased surrender activity resulting from the impact of the MVA feature on certain
contracts as outlined in the Impact of Recent Business Environment section above. During 2009,
U.S. Treasury rates have increased and surrenders have been declining steadily with surrender and
transfer requests in 2009 totaling $253 million of account value in January, $184 million in
February, $154 million in March and $96 million in April. At March 31, 2009, EquiTrust Life direct
annuity contracts with a reserve totaling $2,750.1 million had a gross surrender charge in excess
of 5.0%, but a net surrender charge after the MVA of less than 5.0%. The anticipated surrenders,
combined with the reduction in sales to preserve capital, may cause cash outflows in 2009 to
continue exceeding cash inflows. Any net cash outflow is expected to be funded by cash on hand and
to the extent necessary, proceeds from investment sales of fixed maturity securities in an
unrealized gain position to meet these needs. At March 31, 2009, EquiTrust Life had cash and
short-term investments on hand totaling $280.6 million and fixed maturity securities in an
unrealized gain position totaling $1,339.3 million. In addition, in 2009 EquiTrust Life became a
member of the Federal Home Loan Bank, which provides a source for securitized borrowings if needed.
See the Market Risks of Financial Instruments section in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for
additional discussion on the calculation and impact of MVAs on surrender activity and liquidity.
In the first quarter of 2009, we repaid the outstanding borrowings on our line of credit and
terminated the agreement. See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements for additional
details regarding this agreement.
Interest payments on our debt totaled $7.4 million for the first quarter of 2009 and $4.9 million
for the 2008 period. We paid cash dividends on our common and preferred stock totaling $3.8
million during the first quarters of 2009 and 2008. Interest payments on our debt outstanding at
March 31, 2009 are estimated to be $17.9 million for the remainder of 2009. It is anticipated that
quarterly cash dividend requirements for the second quarter of 2009 will be $0.0075 per Series B
redeemable preferred share and $0.0625 per common share. The level of common stock dividends will
be analyzed quarterly and will be dependent upon our capital and liquidity positions. Assuming a
dividend rate of $0.0625 per common share, the common and preferred dividends would total
approximately $5.7 million during the remainder of 2009. The Company is licensed by the Iowa Farm
Bureau Federation (IFBF), our majority shareholder, to use the Farm Bureau and FB designations
and pays royalty fees to the IFBF as a result of this royalty agreement. The royalty agreement
provides an option for the IFBF to terminate the agreement when FBLs quarterly common stock
dividend is less than $0.10 per share, although we do not anticipate the IFBF will take any action
in this regard.
The ability of the Life Companies to pay dividends to FBL Financial Group, Inc. is limited by law
to earned profits (statutory unassigned surplus) as of the date the dividend is paid, as determined
in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by insurance regulatory authorities of the State
of Iowa. During 2009, the maximum amount legally available for distribution to FBL Financial
Group, Inc., without further regulatory approval, from Farm Bureau Life is $38.2 million.
EquiTrust Life cannot pay a dividend without regulatory approval in 2009 due to its unassigned
surplus position at December 31, 2008.
We manage the amount of our capital to be consistent with an A ratings objective from A.M. Best.
As of March 31, 2009, we estimate that we have sufficient capital in the life insurance
subsidiaries, combined with capital at the holding company, to meet this rating objective.
However, this capital may not be sufficient if significant future losses are incurred and, given
the current market conditions, access to additional capital could be limited.
FBL Financial Group, Inc. expects to rely on available cash resources and dividends from Farm
Bureau Life to make dividend payments to its stockholders and interest payments on its debt. The
parent company had available cash and investments totaling $20.1 million at March 31, 2009. We
anticipate that Farm Bureau Life will pay dividends totaling $15.0 million during the remainder of
2009.
53
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
As of March 31, 2009, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures.
On a consolidated basis, we anticipate that funds to meet our short-term and long-term capital
expenditures, cash dividends to stockholders and operating cash needs will come from existing
capital and internally generated funds. We believe that current levels of cash, available-for-sale
and short-term securities, combined with expected net cash inflows from operations, maturities of
fixed maturity investments, principal payments on mortgage and asset-backed securities and mortgage
loans and premiums and deposits on our insurance products, will be adequate to meet our anticipated
cash obligations for the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that future
experience regarding benefits and surrenders will be similar to historic experience since benefits
and surrender levels are influenced by such factors as the interest rate environment, our financial
strength ratings, the economy and other factors that impact policyholder behavior. Our investment
portfolio at March 31, 2009, included $383.2 million of short-term investments, $11.4 million of
cash and $1,252.5 million in carrying value of U.S. Government and U.S. Government agency backed
securities that could be readily converted to cash at or near carrying value.
Contractual Obligations
In the normal course of business, we enter into insurance contracts, financing transactions, lease
agreements or other commitments which are necessary or beneficial to our operations. These
commitments may obligate us to certain cash flows during future periods. Other than the repayment
of the line of credit discussed above, there have been no material changes to our total contractual
obligations since December 31, 2008.
Recently Adopted Accounting Changes
As discussed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements, we adopted several accounting
pronouncements during the first quarter of 2009.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes in the market risks of our financial instruments since December
31, 2008.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
At the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated
and communicated to the issuers management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our internal control over financial reporting changes from time-to-time as we modify and enhance
our systems and processes to meet our dynamic needs. Changes are also made as we strive to be more
efficient in how we conduct our business. Any significant changes in controls are evaluated prior
to implementation to help ensure the continued effectiveness of our internal controls and internal
control environment. While changes have taken place in our internal controls during the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, there have been no changes that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
54
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits:
|
|
|
3(ii)(c)
|
|
Amendment to the Second Restated Bylaws, adopted March 19, 2009 |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Management Performance Plan (2009) sponsored by FBL Financial Group, Inc. * |
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2008 between
the Company and each of James W. Noyce, Richard J. Kypta, John M. Paule,
Bruce A. Trost, James P. Brannen, Douglas W. Gumm, David T. Sebastian and
Donald J. Seibel * |
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2009 between
the Company and each of James W. Noyce, Richard J. Kypta, John M. Paule,
Bruce A. Trost, James P. Brannen, Douglas W. Gumm, David T. Sebastian and
Donald J. Seibel * |
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Employment Contract dated as of
April 29, 2009 between the Company and James E. Hohmann, CEO * |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Restricted Stock Agreement dated as
of April 29, 2009 between the Company and James E. Hohmann, CEO * |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* Exhibit relates to a compensatory plan for management or directors
55
|
|
|
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 7, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
By |
/s/ James E. Hohmann
|
|
|
|
James E. Hohmann |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ James P. Brannen
|
|
|
|
James P. Brannen |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
56