UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended October 28, 2017

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     .

Commission File Number 001-36107

 

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (609) 387-7800

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ☐   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

The registrant had 68,247,877 shares of common stock outstanding as of October 28, 2017.

 

 

---

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

INDEX

 

 

 

 

 

2

---

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(All amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 

 

3

---

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(All amounts in thousands)

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 

4

---

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(All amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

5

---

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(All amounts in thousands)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

6

---

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

October 28, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

As of October 28, 2017, Burlington Stores, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company), through its indirect subsidiary Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (BCFWC), has expanded its store base to 631 retail stores, inclusive of an internet store, of which 12 remained closed as of October 28, 2017, primarily as a result of weather-related incidents as discussed below.

These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Burlington Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments (which are of a normal and recurring nature) necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods presented. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 (Fiscal 2016 10-K). The balance sheet at January 28, 2017 presented herein has been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Fiscal 2016 10-K. Because the Company’s business is seasonal in nature, the operating results for the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of results for the fiscal year.

Accounting policies followed by the Company are described in Note 1 to the Fiscal 2016 10-K, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Fiscal Year

The Company defines its fiscal year as the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. The current fiscal year ends February 3, 2018 (Fiscal 2017) and is a 53-week fiscal year. The fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 (Fiscal 2016) was 52-week fiscal year.

Adopted Accounting Standards

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees including: (i) requiring all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement, rather than in additional paid in capital, when the awards vest or are settled, (ii) eliminating the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them, (iii) requiring companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity, (iv) increasing the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation, (v) requiring an employer to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on its statement of cash flows and (vi) requiring an employer to elect whether to account for forfeitures of share-based payments by (a) recognizing forfeitures of awards as they occur or (b) estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, as is currently required. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted this standard effective January 29, 2017.

The primary impact of adoption was the prospective recognition of excess tax benefits in the income statement as an income tax benefit rather than equity, which increased net income per share during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 by $0.04 and $0.20, respectively, by lowering the Company’s effective tax rate approximately 430 basis points and 730 basis points, respectively.

 

7

---

The Company has applied the amendment relating to the presentation of the excess tax benefits on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows retrospectively, resulting in the reclassification of $11.7 million of excess tax benefits from cash flows from financing activities to cash flows from operating activities for the nine month period ended October 29, 2016.

The Company has elected to account for forfeitures of share-based awards as they occur, on a modified retrospective basis, resulting in a $0.4 million cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 29, 2017.

The presentation requirements for cash flows related to employee taxes paid upon the vesting of restricted stock awards had no impact to any of the periods presented in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows since such cash flows have historically been presented as a financing activity.

Pending Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which converges revenue recognition under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The new guidance supersedes most preexisting revenue recognition guidance, and provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for public companies to periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The standard shall be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of the fiscal year ending February 2, 2019 (Fiscal 2018). The Company is in the process of determining the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. The Company believes that there will be no change in the timing or amount of revenue recognized under the new standard as it relates to revenue from point of sale at the registers in our stores, which constitutes more than 99% of the Company’s revenue. The new standard will require a change in the presentation of the Company’s sales return reserve on the balance sheet, which is currently recorded net. The new standard will require the reserve to be established at the gross sales value with an asset established for the value of the merchandise returned. The Company does not, however, anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” The standard’s core principle is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of the fiscal year ending February 1, 2020 (Fiscal 2019). Early adoption is permitted. While the Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements or notes thereto, it does expect that this new guidance will result in a significant increase to the assets and liabilities presented on its consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 13 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Fiscal 2016 10-K (entitled “Lease Commitments”) for further detail of the Company’s future minimum lease payments. This guidance is not expected, however, to have a material impact on the Company's liquidity.

On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The primary purpose of this ASU is to reduce the diversity in practice that has resulted from the lack of consistent principles on this topic. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. The Company does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash.” The primary purpose of this ASU is to reduce the diversity in practice that exists in the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. This ASU will require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. While the Company is still in the process of determining the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements or notes thereto, it does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On January 26, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which aims to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, goodwill impairment will be measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The new guidance will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods. This ASU will be effective for

 

8

---

the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2020. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

There were no other new accounting standards that had a material impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017, and there were no other new accounting standards or pronouncements that were issued but not yet effective as of October 28, 2017 that the Company expects to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations upon becoming effective.

Weather-Related Incidents

As a result of the effects of certain weather-related incidents during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, 80 of the Company’s stores were closed for at least one day during the quarter.  The Company incurred losses of (i) $5.9 million related to the net book values of merchandise inventories, and (ii) $9.7 million related to the net book values of property and equipment and other long-lived assets, as well as repair and maintenance costs related to the clean-up of its stores. These costs are recorded in the line items “Cost of sales” and “Selling general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, respectively, for the three and nine months ended October 28, 2017. As of October 31, 2017, the Company received approximately $11.7 million of insurance proceeds to offset some of its losses.  The Company allocated $3.1 million of these proceeds to property and equipment, which is included in the line item “Proceeds from insurance recoveries related to property and equipment,” a component of cash flows from investing activities, on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows during the nine months ended October 28, 2017.  The Company is insured at the selling price of the inventory and at replacement costs for the property and equipment and other long-lived assets, less a deductible. The Company has recorded a $2.8 million receivable related to these losses as of October 28, 2017, as the collection is deemed probable based on the insurance contracts the Company had in place at the time of the losses, which is included in the line item “Accounts receivable” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

2. Long Term Debt

Long term debt consists of:

 

Term Loan Facility

At October 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, the Company’s borrowing rate related to its senior secured term loan facility (the Term Loan Facility) was 4.0% and 3.5%, respectively.

On November 17, 2017, BCFWC entered into Amendment No. 6 (the Sixth Amendment) to the Term Loan Credit Agreement (as amended, the Amended Term Loan Credit Agreement) governing its senior secured term loan facility (the Term Loan Facility). The Sixth Amendment, among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable to the Term Loan Facility from 1.75% to 1.50% in the case of prime rate loans, and from 2.75% to 2.50% in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor continuing to be 0.75%. The Sixth Amendment also extended the maturity date from August 13, 2021 to November 17, 2024. The Sixth Amendment was accomplished by replacing the outstanding $1,117.0 million principal amount of Term B-4 Loans with a like aggregate principal amount of Term B-5 Loans. The Company is required to make quarterly payments of $2.8 million on the Term B-5 Loans, due on the last fiscal day of each quarter, with the balance due upon maturity. As a result of this transaction, the Company will incur approximately a $3 million charge to loss on extinguishment of debt and approximately a $1 million charge to costs related to debt amendments in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2017.  

 

9

---

ABL Line of Credit

At October 28, 2017, the Company had $380.6 million available under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 2, 2011, governing BCFWC’s existing senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the ABL Line of Credit). The maximum borrowings under the facility during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 amounted to $235.5 million for both periods. Average borrowings during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 amounted to $147.4 million and $86.1 million, respectively, at average interest rates of 2.7% for both periods.

At October 29, 2016, the Company had $383.7 million available under the ABL Line of Credit. The maximum borrowings under the facility during the three and nine month periods ended October 29, 2016 amounted to $300.0 million and $350.0 million, respectively. Average borrowings during the three and nine month periods ended October 29, 2016 amounted to $201.4 million and $216.8 million, respectively, at average interest rates of 1.8% for both periods.

 

 

3. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company accounts for derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (Topic No. 815). As required by Topic No. 815, the Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value and adjusts to market on a quarterly basis. In addition, to comply with the provisions of ASC Topic No. 820, “Fair Value Measurements” (Topic No. 820), credit valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit enhancements to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees. In accordance with Topic No. 820, the Company made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio. There is no impact of netting because the Company’s only derivatives are interest rate cap contracts that are with separate counterparties and are under separate master netting agreements.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract.

The Company did not record any hedge ineffectiveness in its earnings during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 or October 29, 2016. The Company financed the cost of the interest rate cap contracts, which will be amortized through the life of the caps. During the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017, the Company paid $0.8 million and $3.4 million, respectively, exclusive of $0.3 million and $1.4 million of taxes, respectively, related to the financing of these interest rate cap contracts.  During the three and nine month periods ended October 29, 2016, the Company paid $0.9 million and $3.5 million, respectively, exclusive of $0.4 million and $1.4 million of taxes, respectively, related to the financing of these interest rate cap contracts. These costs are included in the line item “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company estimates that approximately $5.4 million will be reclassified into interest expense during the next twelve months.

As of October 28, 2017, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:

 

 

10

---

Tabular Disclosure

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on a gross basis as well as their classification on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

 

The following table presents the unrealized losses deferred to accumulated other comprehensive loss resulting from the Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments for each of the reporting periods.

 

 

 

The following table presents information about the reclassification of losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings related to the Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments for each of the reporting periods.

 

 

 

 

4. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss are recorded net of the related income tax effects. The following table details the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

11

---

 

5. Fair Value Measurements

The Company accounts for fair value measurements in accordance with Topic No. 820, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measurement and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Topic No. 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price), and classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Refer to Note 3, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” for further discussion regarding the fair value of the Company’s interest rate cap contracts.

Financial Assets

The fair values of the Company’s financial assets and the hierarchy of the level of inputs as of October 28, 2017, January 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016 are summarized below: 

Non-financial Assets

Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for purposes of calculating impairment using the fair value hierarchy of Topic No. 820. The fair value of the Company’s long-lived assets is generally calculated using discounted cash flows. During the nine month period ended October 28, 2017, the Company recorded impairment charges of $1.0 million, primarily related to declines in revenues and operating results for one leased store, which was fully impaired, and a decline in the appraised fair value of one of the Company’s owned stores, which was partially impaired.  These costs were recorded in the line item “Impairment charges – long-lived assets” in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The fully impaired store had zero fair value as of October 28, 2017, and would be categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy described above. The table below sets forth the aggregate impairment charges and the remaining fair value, by level within the fair value hierarchy, of the partially-impaired store as of October 28, 2017:

 

12

---

Financial Liabilities

The fair values of the Company’s financial liabilities are summarized below:

 

 

The fair values presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the respective period end dates. The estimated fair values of the Company’s debt are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

 

 

6. Income Taxes

Net deferred taxes are as follows: