UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant S
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant £
Check the appropriate box:
£ Preliminary Proxy Statement
£ Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
S Definitive Proxy Statement
£ Definitive Additional Materials
£ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
FOOT LOCKER, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
S No fee required.
£ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(5) |
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
£ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
£ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(3) |
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(4) |
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
NOTICE OF 2014 ANNUAL MEETING
AND
PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
i
ii
1
1
1
2
2
3
5
6
6 Persons Owning More than Five Percent of the Companys Stock
7
8
8
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
12
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
16
16
16
17
19
19
20
20
25
25
25
40
41
Page
44
48
51
51
54
56
68
70
71
71
72
72
73
75 Proposal 2: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
79
79
79
80 Proposal 3: Approval of an Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation
81
82
92 Deadlines and Procedures for Nominations and Shareholder Proposals
93
95
A-1 Appendix BSecond Amended and Restated Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
B-1
112 West 34th Street NOTICE OF 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
DATE AND TIME:
May 21, 2014 at 9:00 A.M., Eastern Daylight Time
PLACE:
Foot Locker, Inc., 112 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10120
RECORD DATE:
Shareholders of record on March 24, 2014 can vote at this meeting.
ITEMS OF BUSINESS:
Elect four members to the Board of Directors to serve for three-year terms.
Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2014 fiscal year.
Approve an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors.
Approve the second amendment and restatement of the Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
Advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers.
Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and at any adjournment or postponement.
PROXY VOTING:
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO US. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please promptly vote by telephone or by Internet, or by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card or vote instruction form so that your shares will be
represented at the Annual Meeting. April 11, 2014 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting The Companys Proxy Statement and 2013 Annual Report/Form 10-K are available at i
New York, New York 10120
GARY M. BAHLER
Secretary
To Be Held on May 21, 2014
http://materials.proxyvote.com/344849
We are providing this summary of our 2014 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the items to be voted on by our shareholders. This is only a summary. For more complete information, please review the complete Proxy Statement and our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Date and Time
Wednesday, May 21, 2014, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time Place
Foot Locker, Inc., 112 West 34th Street, New York, NY 10120 Record Date
March 24, 2014 Information on the Board of Directors Board of Directors
Independent Lead Director Maxine Clark
Guillermo Marmol
Nicholas DiPaolo Nicholas DiPaolo
Matthew M. McKenna
Alan D. Feldman
Steven Oakland
Jarobin Gilbert Jr.
Cheryl Nido Turpin
Ken C. Hicks
Dona D. Young
Director Independence
Director Attendance in 2013 9 out of 10 directors are independent
Attendance at Board and Committee Named Executive Officers Ken C. Hicks
Chairman, President and CEO Richard A. Johnson
Executive Vice President and COO Lauren B. Peters
Executive Vice President and CFO Robert W. McHugh
Executive Vice President-Operations Support Paulette Alviti
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer Our 2013 Results In 2013, for the third year in a row, Foot Locker, Inc. achieved record sales, earnings, and earnings per share in our history as an athletic footwear and apparel company. Results included:
Net income, on a non-GAAP basis, of $432 million or earnings-per-share of $2.87, a 16% increase over 2012. (A reconciliation to GAAP is provided on Pages 16-18 of our 2013 Form 10-K.) End-of-year market capitalization of $5.6 billion, an 8% increase over year-end 2012. Total dividend payments to shareholders of $118 million. Total share repurchases of $229 million. Total shareholder return (stock price appreciation plus reinvested dividends) of 13.6 percent. ii
Meetings in 2013 exceeded 98%
Proposals and the Board of Directors Voting Recommendations
Proposal
Board Vote
Page Reference Election of Four Directors
FOR EACH NOMINEE
72-78 Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP
FOR
79-80 Approval of Amendment to the Certificate
FOR
81 Approval of the Second Amendment and
Restatement of the Foot Locker 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan
FOR
82-91 Advisory Approval of Our Named Executive
Officers Compensation
FOR
92-93 Election of Directors Four directors are standing for election at this meeting. The following table provides summary information about each of the nominees for director:
Name
Age
Director
Occupation
Independent
Other Public
Nicholas DiPaolo
72
2002
Retired Vice Chairman of
Bernard Chaus, Inc.
Yes
JPS Industries, Inc.
Matthew M.
McKenna
63
2006
Special Advisor to the U.S.
Secretary of Agriculture
Yes
None
Steven Oakland
53
2014
President, International,
Foodservice and Natural
Foods, The J.M. Smucker
Company
Yes
None
Cheryl Nido Turpin
66
2001
Retired President & CEO of
The Limited Stores
Yes
None Ratification of Appointment of KPMG LLP for 2014 We are asking our shareholders to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2014. The following is a summary of KPMGs fees for 2013 and 2012:
2013
2012 Audit Fees
$
2,967,000
$
2,815,000 Audit-Related Fees
614,000
803,000 Tax Fees
165,000
267,000 All Other Fees
0
0 Total
$
3,746,000
$
3,885,000 iii
Recommendation
for More Detail
as Our Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm for 2014
of Incorporation to Declassify the Board
of Directors
Since
Company Boards
R.G. Barry Corporation
Approval of an Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation We are asking shareholders to approve an amendment to the Companys Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors. The Certificate of Incorporation currently provides that the Board be divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. The proposed amendment
provides that, beginning with directors elected in 2015, directors would be elected on an annual basis. Directors elected prior to the effectiveness of the proposed amendment would continue in office until the expiration of their terms of office. A complete copy of the proposed amendment is provided in
Appendix A on Page A-1. Approval of the Second Amendment and Restatement of the We are asking shareholders to approve the second amendment and restatement of the Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the aggregate share reserve to 14 million shares, inclusive of shares currently remaining under the Stock Incentive Plan, and amend the definition of Change in
Control and the vesting provisions of awards following a Change in Control. There are currently 1,721,896 million shares available for grant under the plan. If shareholders approve this proposal, it will result in a net increase of 12,278,104 million shares under the plan. The Board of Directors believes that
the proposed increase in the share reserve is necessary to insure that a sufficient reserve of Common Stock remains available to meet anticipated future needs in issuing equity incentives and thereby continuing to align our executives and nonemployee directors interests with those of our shareholders.
We are also seeking shareholder re-approval of the performance goals under the plan. A summary of the material features of the Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, is provided beginning on Page 82, and a complete copy of the amended and restated plan is provided in
Appendix B beginning on Page B-1. Advisory Approval of the Named Executive Officers Compensation We are asking shareholders to approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the 2013 compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement on Pages 25 through 71. Over the past three years, our shareholders overwhelmingly approved our executive compensation program.
Given this strong support, the Compensation and Management Resources Committee decided to retain the overall program, which ties the executives pay closely with Foot Lockers performance. Our 2013 results reflect our diligent execution of the Companys strategies and represent continued
meaningful progress toward the goals contained in our current long-range plan. Based on the Companys performance, the named executive officers earned annual bonuses for 2013 and long-term incentive payouts for the 2012-2013 performance measurement period payable in 2015.
Financial Metrics
2012
2013
Long-Term Sales
$6,101 million
$6,505 million
$7,500 million Sales Per Gross Square Foot
$443
$460
$500 Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) Margin
9.9%
10.4%
11% Net Income Margin
6.2%
6.6%
7% Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
14.2%
14.1%
14% The above table represents non-GAAP results. We provide a reconciliation to GAAP on Pages 16-18 of our 2013 Form 10-K. iv
to Declassify the Board
Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
Objectives
112 West 34th Street PROXY STATEMENT We are providing these proxy materials to you for the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Foot Locker, Inc. for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and for any adjournments or postponements of this meeting. We are holding this annual meeting on May 21, 2014 at 9:00 A.M.,
local time, at our corporate headquarters located at 112 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10120. In this proxy statement we refer to Foot Locker, Inc. as Foot Locker, the Company, we, our, or us. We are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily over the Internet under the Securities and Exchange Commissions notice and access rules instead of mailing full sets of the printed materials. We believe that this procedure reduces costs, provides greater flexibility to our shareholders,
and lessens the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. On or about April 11, 2014 we started mailing to most of our shareholders in the United States a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the Foot Locker Notice). The Foot Locker Notice contains instructions on how to access and
read our 2014 Proxy Statement and our 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders on the Internet and to vote online. If you received a Foot Locker Notice by mail, you will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials in the mail unless you request them. Instead, the Foot Locker Notice instructs you on
how to access and read the Proxy Statement and Annual Report and how you may submit your proxy over the Internet. If you received a Foot Locker Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of the materials, please follow the instructions on the Foot Locker Notice for requesting the
materials, and we will promptly mail the materials to you. We are mailing to shareholders, or making available to shareholders via the Internet, this Proxy Statement, form of proxy card, and our 2013 Annual Report/Form10-K on or about April 11, 2014. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THIS ANNUAL MEETING What is included in these proxy materials? The proxy materials include our 2014 Proxy Statement and 2013 Annual Report and Form 10-K. If you received printed copies of these materials by mail, these materials also include the proxy card for this annual meeting. May I obtain an additional copy of the Form 10-K? You may obtain an additional copy of our 2013 Form 10-K without charge by writing to our Investor Relations Department at Foot Locker, Inc., 112 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10120. It is also available free of charge through our corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance.
New York, New York 10120
AND VOTING
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS What constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting? We will have a quorum and will be able to conduct the business of the Annual Meeting if the holders of a majority of the shares outstanding are present at the meeting, either in person or by proxy. We will count abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, as present and entitled to vote in
determining whether we have a quorum. What is the record date for this meeting? The record date for this meeting is March 24, 2014. If you were a Foot Locker shareholder on this date, you are entitled to vote on the items of business described in this proxy statement. Who may vote at the Annual Meeting? The only voting securities of Foot Locker are our shares of Common Stock. Only shareholders of record on the books of the Company on March 24, 2014 are entitled to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements. Each share is entitled to one vote. There were 145,817,895
shares of Common Stock outstanding on March 24, 2014. Can I vote shares held in employee plans? If you hold shares of Foot Locker Common Stock through the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan or the Foot Locker Puerto Rico 1165(e) Plan, your proxy card includes the number of shares allocated to your plan account. Your proxy card will serve as a voting instruction card for these shares for the plan trustee
to vote the shares. The trustee will vote only those shares for which voting instructions have been given. To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustees of these plans, your voting instructions must be received by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 18, 2014. 2
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS The proposals that you are being asked to vote on at this Annual Meeting, our Boards voting recommendations, and the vote required to approve each proposal are shown in the table below:
Proposal
Subject
Boards Voting
Vote Required to Approve
1
Election of Four Directors in Class II
FOR EACH NOMINEE
Plurality of Votes Cast by Shareholders
2
Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2014
FOR
Majority of Votes Cast by Shareholders
3
Approval of an Amendment to the Companys Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify the Board of Directors
FOR
Majority of Shares Outstanding
4
Approval of the Second Amendment and Restatement of the Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
FOR
Majority of Votes Cast by Shareholders
5
Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation
FOR
Majority of Votes Cast by Shareholders Could other matters be voted on at the Annual Meeting? We do not know of any other business that will be presented at the 2014 annual meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting for consideration, then the persons named as proxies will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you using their best judgment. What happens if I do not vote my shares? This depends on how you hold your shares and the type of proposal. If you hold your shares in street name, such as through a bank or brokerage account, it is important that you cast your vote if you want it to count for Proposals 1, 3, 4 and 5. If you do not instruct your bank or broker how to
vote your shares on these proposals, no votes will be cast on your behalf because the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a broker non-vote. With regard to Proposal 2, your bank or broker will have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares for this proposal. 3
Number
Recommendation
Please see our policy described on Page 9 regarding resignations by directors who do not receive more For votes than
Withheld votes.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS If you are a shareholder of record where your stock ownership is reflected directly on the books and records of the Companys transfer agent, or if you hold your shares through the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan or Foot Locker 1165(e) Plan, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the proposals if
you do not cast your vote. How will the votes be counted? Votes will be counted and certified by an independent inspector of election. Votes withheld for the election of one or more of the nominees for director will not be counted as votes cast for them. Except in the case of Proposals 3 and 4, if you abstain from voting or there is a broker non-vote on any matter, your abstention or broker non-vote will not affect the outcome of
such vote because abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast. With respect to Proposal 3 to approve the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, an abstention and broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. With respect to Proposal 4 to
approve the second amendment and restatement of the Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, which is subject to New York Stock Exchange shareholder approval rules, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of such vote because broker non-votes are not considered votes cast; however,
abstentions are counted as votes cast and, therefore, will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. The Companys Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws do not contain any provisions on the effect of abstentions or broker non-votes. How do I vote my shares? You may vote using any of the following methods:
Telephone If you are located within the United States or Canada, you can vote your shares by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following the recorded instructions. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 20, 2014. The telephone voting system
has easy to follow instructions and allows you to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. If you vote by telephone, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form.
Internet You can also choose to vote your shares through the Internet at www.proxyvote.com. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 20, 2014. As with telephone voting, you will be able to confirm that the system has properly recorded
your vote. If you vote via the Internet, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form.
QR Code You may also choose to scan the QR Code provided to you to vote your shares through the Internet with your mobile device. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 20, 2014. You will be able to confirm that the system has
properly recorded your vote. You do NOT need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form if you scan your QR code to vote.
Mail If you received printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may choose to vote by mail. Simply mark your proxy card or voting instruction form, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope that we included with your materials. 4
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Ballot at the Annual Meeting You may also vote by ballot at the Annual Meeting if you decide to attend in person. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote at the meeting. All shares that have been properly voted and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting. If you sign and return a proxy card but do not give voting instructions, the shares represented by that proxy card will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors. Can I change my mind after voting my shares? You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is used by (i) sending a written notice to the Company at its corporate headquarters, (ii) delivering a valid proxy card with a later date, (iii) providing a later dated vote by telephone or Internet, or (iv) voting by ballot at the Annual Meeting. Will my vote be confidential? We maintain the confidentiality of our shareholders votes. All proxy cards, electronic voting, voting instructions, ballots, and voting tabulations identifying shareholders are kept confidential from the Company, except:
as necessary to meet any applicable legal requirements, when a shareholder requests disclosure or writes a comment on a proxy card, in a contested proxy solicitation, and to allow independent inspectors of election to tabulate and certify the vote. Do I need a ticket to attend the Annual Meeting? You will need an admission ticket to attend the Annual Meeting. Attendance at the meeting will be limited to shareholders on March 24, 2014 (or their authorized representatives) having an admission ticket or proof of their share ownership, and guests of the Company. If you plan to attend the
meeting, please indicate this when you are voting by telephone or Internet or check the box on your proxy card, and we will promptly mail an admission ticket to you. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, or other holder of record and you plan to attend the meeting, you can obtain an admission ticket in advance by providing proof of your ownership, such as a bank or brokerage account statement, to the Corporate Secretary at Foot Locker, Inc.,
112 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10120. If you do not have an admission ticket, you must show proof of your ownership of the Companys Common Stock at the registration table at the door. Who pays the cost of this proxy solicitation? We will pay for the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including the preparation, printing and mailing of the proxy materials. Proxies may be solicited, without additional compensation, by our directors, officers, or employees by mail, telephone, fax, in person, or otherwise. We will request banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to deliver proxy materials to the beneficial owners of Foot Lockers
Common Stock and obtain their voting instructions, and we will reimburse those firms for their expenses under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and The New York Stock Exchange. In addition, we have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist us in the solicitation of proxies for a
fee of $15,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses. 5
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF THE COMPANYS STOCK Directors and Executive Officers The following table shows the number of shares of Common Stock reported to us as beneficially owned by each of our directors and named executive officers as of March 24, 2014. The table also shows beneficial ownership by all directors, named executive officers, and executive officers as a group
on that date, including shares of Common Stock that they have a right to acquire within 60 days after March 24, 2014 by the exercise of stock options. Ken C. Hicks beneficially owned 1.52 percent of the total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 24, 2014. No other director, named executive officer, or executive officer beneficially owned one percent or more of the total number of outstanding shares as of that date. Each
person has sole voting and investment power for the number of shares shown unless otherwise noted.
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
Name
Common Stock
Stock Options
RSUs and
Total Paulette Alviti
33,253
33,253 Maxine Clark
1,351
1,505
2,856 Nicholas DiPaolo
62,933
(c)
6,317
1,505
70,755 Alan D. Feldman
47,564
6,314
25,635
79,513 Jarobin Gilbert Jr.
35,037
6,317
1,505
42,859 Ken C. Hicks
516,841
1,693,333
2,210,174 Richard A. Johnson
195,456
283,332
478,788 Guillermo G. Marmol
19,752
1,505
21,257 Robert W. McHugh
171,578
298,333
469,911 Matthew M. McKenna
74,580
4,287
1,505
80,372 Steven Oakland
Lauren B. Peters
117,656
269,999
387,655 Cheryl Nido Turpin
38,821
6,317
42,290
87,428 Dona D. Young
31,280
6,317
52,325
89,922 All 19 directors and executive officers as a group, including the named executive officers
1,545,998
2,997,063
127,775
4,670,836
(d) Notes to Beneficial Ownership Table
(a)
This column includes shares held in the Companys 401(k) Plan and, where applicable, executives unvested shares of restricted stock as listed below over which they have sole voting power but no investment power:
Name
Number of Unvested
K. Hicks
74,000
L. Peters
20,000
R. Johnson
20,000
R. McHugh
20,000
P. Alviti
30,000 6
Beneficially Owned
Excluding
Stock Options(a)
Exercisable Within
60 Days After
3/24/2014
Deferred
Stock Units(b)
Shares of Restricted
Stock
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
(b)
This column includes (i) the number of deferred stock units credited as of March 24, 2014 to the account of the directors who elected to defer all or part of their annual retainer fee and (ii) time-vested restricted stock units (RSUs). The deferred stock units and RSUs do not have current voting or
investment power. (c) Includes 1,050 shares held by his spouse. (d) This number represents approximately 3.2 percent of the shares of Common Stock outstanding at the close of business on March 24, 2014. Persons Owning More Than Five Percent of the Companys Stock The following table provides information on shareholders who beneficially own more than five percent of our Common Stock according to reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). To the best of our knowledge, there are no other shareholders who beneficially own more
than five percent of a class of the Companys voting securities.
Name and Address of
Amount and
Percent BlackRock, Inc.
9,667,583(a
)
6.6
%(a) 40 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022 FMR LLC
9,312,634(b
)
6.346
%(b) 245 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210 The Vanguard Group
8,118,085(c
)
5.53
%(c) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 Harris Associates L.P. and
8,129,056(d
)
5.5
%(d) Harris Associates Inc. 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 500 Chicago, IL 60602-3790 Notes to Table on Persons Owning More than Five Percent of the Companys Stock
(a)
Reflects shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2013 according to Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC. As reported in this schedule, BlackRock, Inc., a parent holding company, holds sole voting power with respect to 8,859,636 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to
9,667,583 shares. (b) Reflects shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2013 according to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC. As reported in this schedule, (1) Fidelity Management & Research Company (Fidelity), a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and an investment adviser, is the beneficial owner of 8,559,119
shares as a result of acting as investment adviser to various investment companies. Edward C. Johnson 3d and FMR LLC, through its control of Fidelity, and the funds each has sole power to dispose of the 8,559,119 shares owned by the funds. (2) Fidelity SelectCo, LLC (SelectCo), 1225 17th Street,
Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80202, a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and an investment adviser, is the beneficial owner of 509,352 shares as a result of acting as investment adviser to various investment companies (SelectCo Funds). Edward C. Johnson 3d and FMR LLC, through its control of
SelectCo, and the SelectCo Funds each has sole power to dispose of the 509,352 shares. Neither FMR LLC nor Edward C. Johnson 3d has the sole 7
Beneficial Owner
Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
of Class
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the Fidelity Funds. (3) Strategic Advisers, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and an investment adviser, provides investment advisory services to individuals. As such, FMR LLCs beneficial ownership includes 1,584 shares
beneficially owned through Strategic Advisers, Inc. (4) Pyramis Global Advisers, LLC (PGALLC), 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, Rhode Island 02917, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and an investment adviser, is the beneficial owner of 39,500 shares as a result of its serving as investment
adviser to institutional accounts, non-U.S. mutual funds, or investment companies owning the shares. Edward C. Johnson 3d and FMR LLC, through its control of PGALLC, each has sole dispositive power and sole power to vote or to direct the voting over the 39,500 shares. (4) Pyramis Global Advisors
Trust Company (PGATC), 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, Rhode Island 02917, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and a bank, is the beneficial owner of 203,079 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of institutional accounts owning the shares. Edward C. Johnson 3d and
FMR LLC, through its control of PGATC, each has sole dispositive power and sole power to vote or to direct the voting of 203,079 shares owned by the institutional accounts managed by PGATC. (c) Reflects shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2013 according to Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC. As reported in this schedule, The Vanguard Group, an investment adviser, holds sole voting power with respect to 94,510 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to
8,034,275 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 83,810 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 83,810 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard
Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 10,700 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings. (d) Reflects shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2013 according to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC. As reported in this schedule, Harris Associates L.P., an investment adviser, holds sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 8,098,456 shares. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that our directors and executive officers file with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports of ownership and changes in ownership of Foot Lockers Common Stock. Based on our records and other information, we believe that during
the 2013 fiscal year, the directors and executive officers complied with all applicable SEC filing requirements. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INFORMATION The Board of Directors is committed to good corporate governance and has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and other policies and practices to guide the Board and senior management in this area. This section of the proxy statement summarizes our key corporate governance policies and
practices. Our Board of Directors Our Board of Directors comprises directors having a mix of business experience, education, skills, and service on our Board, as well as on the boards of other organizations. Our Board also reflects diversity in terms of gender, age, and ethnicity. Over the past three years, four new directors have been
elected to the Board, three directors retired in accordance with the retirement policy for directors, and a new independent lead director was appointed. 8
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Corporate Governance Guidelines The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board periodically reviews the guidelines and may revise them when appropriate. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the corporate governance section of the Companys corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. You may also obtain a printed copy of the guidelines by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Companys headquarters. The Board of Directors has adopted charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Management Resources Committee, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Copies of the charters for these committees are available on
the corporate governance section of the Companys corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. You may also obtain printed copies of these charters by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Companys headquarters. Policy on Voting for Directors Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that if a nominee for director in an uncontested election receives more votes withheld from his or her election than votes for election (a Majority Withheld Vote), then the director must offer his or her resignation for consideration by the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the Nominating Committee). The Nominating Committee will evaluate the resignation, weighing the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on the action to be taken. For example,
the Nominating Committee may recommend (i) accepting the resignation, (ii) maintaining the director but addressing what the Nominating Committee believes to be the underlying cause of the withheld votes, (iii) resolving that the director will not be re-nominated in the future for election, or
(iv) rejecting the resignation. When making its determination, the Nominating Committee will consider all factors that it deems relevant, including (i) any stated reasons why shareholders withheld votes from the director, (ii) any alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes, (iii) the
directors tenure, (iv) the directors qualifications, (v) the directors past and expected future contributions to the Board and to the Company, and (vi) the overall composition of the Board, including whether accepting the resignation would cause the Company to fall below the minimum number of
directors required under the Companys By-laws or fail to meet any applicable Securities and Exchange Commission or New York Stock Exchange requirements. We will promptly disclose the Boards decision on whether or not to accept the directors resignation, including, if applicable, the reasons for
rejecting the offered resignation. The Board believes that a significant majority of the members of the Board should be independent, as determined by the Board based on the criteria established by The New York Stock Exchange. Each year, the Nominating Committee reviews any relationships between outside directors and the
Company that may affect independence. Currently, one of the ten members of the Board of Directors serves as an officer of the Company, and the remaining nine directors are independent under the criteria established by The New York Stock Exchange. Please see Pages 14-16 for more information
regarding director independence. 9
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE As a general principle, the Board believes that the periodic rotation of committee assignments on a staggered basis is desired and provides an opportunity to foster diverse perspective and develop breadth of knowledge within the Board. We have had a lead director since 2004. The lead directors responsibilities include reviewing and approving Board agendas; chairing executive sessions of the Board and meetings of the independent directors, both of which are held in conjunction with each quarterly Board meeting; leading the
annual review of the Chief Executive Officers performance; attending meetings of Board committees; and serving as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer. The Board of Directors considers the periodic rotation of the lead director from time to time, taking into
account experience, continuity of leadership, and the best interests of the Company. Nicholas DiPaolo currently serves as the lead director. The Board believes that Mr. DiPaolo is well-suited to serve as lead director, given his business and financial background and more than ten years of service on our Board. The Board of Directors evaluates, from time to time as appropriate, whether the same person should serve as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, or whether the positions should be split, in light of all relevant factors and circumstances, and what it considers to be in the best interests
of the Company and its shareholders. In recent years, the Board has utilized various leadership structures. For example, from 2001 to 2004, the positions were separated, with a previously independent director serving as Chairman of the Board. From 2004 to 2009, the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer were held
by the same person, with an independent member of the Board serving as lead director. From August 2009 to January 2010, the positions were again separated, with the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer serving as Chairman of the Board and an independent member of the Board serving as lead
director. Since January 2010, Mr. Hicks has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer with an independent member of the Board serving as lead director. Nicholas DiPaolo, an independent director, has served as the lead independent director since May 2012. The Board believes that the current leadership structure is appropriate for the Company in light of the Companys and the Boards history of operating effectively when these positions have been combined; the availability of directors such as Mr. DiPaolo to serve as a strong, independent lead
director; the size of the Board, which allows a free flow of communication among its members and between the independent members and the Chairman; the important role played by our committee chairs; the independence of our directors; and Mr. Hicks background and experience. Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors The Board of Directors holds regularly scheduled executive sessions of non-management directors in conjunction with each quarterly Board meeting. Nicholas DiPaolo, as lead director, presides at these executive sessions. Board Members Attendance at Annual Meetings Although we do not have a policy on our Board members attendance at annual shareholders meetings, we encourage each director to attend these important meetings. The annual meeting is 10
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE normally scheduled on the same day as a quarterly Board of Directors meeting. In 2013, all of the directors then serving attended the annual shareholders meeting. Director Orientation and Education We have an orientation program for new directors that is intended to educate a new director on the Company and the Boards practices. At the orientation, the newly elected director generally meets with the Companys Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the
General Counsel and Secretary, and other senior officers of the Company, to review the business operations, financial matters, investor relations, corporate governance policies, the composition of the Board and its committees, and succession and development plans. Additionally, he or she has the opportunity
to visit our stores at the Companys New York headquarters, or elsewhere, with a senior division officer for an introduction to store operations. We also provide the Board of Directors with educational training from time to time on subjects applicable to the Board and the Company, including with regard to
retailing, accounting, financial reporting, and corporate governance, using both internal and external resources. Payment of Directors Fees in Stock The non-employee directors receive one-half of their annual retainer fees, including committee chair and lead director retainer fees, in shares of the Companys Common Stock, with the balance payable in cash. Directors may elect to receive up to 100 percent of their fees in stock. The Board has established a policy in its Corporate Governance Guidelines that directors retire from the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders following the directors 72nd birthday. As part of the Nominating Committees regular evaluation of the Companys directors and the overall needs of
the Board, the Nominating Committee may ask a director to remain on the Board for an additional period of time beyond age 72, or to stand for re-election after reaching age 72. For any director over age 72, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates that director each year in light
of the retirement policy to determine his or her continued service on the Board. As described on Page 72, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has asked Nicholas DiPaolo, age 72, to continue to serve on the Board and to stand for re-election in 2014. Change in a Directors Principal Employment The Board has established a policy that any director whose principal employment changes is required to advise the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of this change. If requested by the Chair of the Committee, after consultation with the members of the Committee, the
director will submit a letter of resignation to the Chair of the Committee, and the Committee would then meet to consider whether to accept or reject the letter of resignation. The Board of Directors has oversight responsibilities regarding risks that could affect the Company. This oversight is conducted primarily through the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has established procedures for reviewing the Companys risks. These procedures include regular risk monitoring
by Foot Locker management to update current risks and identify potential new and emerging risks, quarterly risk reviews by management with the Audit Committee, and an annual risk report to the full Board of Directors. The Audit Committee Chair reports on the committees meetings, considerations,
and actions to the full Board at the next Board meeting following each committee meeting. In addition, the Compensation and Management Resources Committee 11
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE considers risk in relation to the Companys compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committees independent compensation consultant provides an annual report to the committee on risk relative to the Companys compensation programs. The Company believes that this process for risk oversight is appropriate in light of the nature of the Companys business, its size, and the active participation of senior members of management, including the Chief Executive Officer, in managing risk and holding regular discussions on risk with the
Audit Committee, the Compensation and Management Resources Committee, and the Board. The Board of Directors has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines. The Guidelines were initially adopted in 2006 and were most recently amended as of the start of the 2012 fiscal year. These guidelines cover the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer, and Other Principal Officers. The
Guidelines are as follows:
Covered Position
Current
Non-Employee Directors
4 x Annual Retainer Fee
Chief Executive Officer
6 x Annual Base Salary
Executive Vice Presidents
3 x Annual Base Salary
Senior Vice Presidents and CEOs of Operating Divisions
2 x Annual Base Salary
Managing Directors of Operating Divisions and Corporate Vice Presidents
0.5 x Annual Base Salary Shares of unvested restricted stock, unvested restricted stock units, and deferred stock units are counted towards beneficial ownership. Performance-based restricted stock units are counted once earned. Stock options and shares held through the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan are disregarded in calculating
beneficial ownership. Non-employee directors and executives who are covered by the guidelines are required to be in compliance within five years after the effective date of becoming subject to these guidelines. In the event of any later increase in the required ownership level, whether as a result of an increase in the
annual retainer fee or base salary or an increase in the required ownership multiple, then the target date for compliance with the increased ownership guideline is five years after the effective date of such increase. All non-employee directors and executives who were required to be in compliance as of the end of the 2013 fiscal year are in compliance. The Company measures compliance with the guidelines at the end of each fiscal year based on the market value of the Companys stock, with the compliance
determination at that point in time applying for the next fiscal year, regardless of fluctuations in the Companys stock price. If a director or covered executive fails to be in compliance by the required compliance date, then he or she must hold the net shares obtained through future stock option exercises and the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units, after payment of applicable taxes, until coming into
compliance with the guidelines. In order to take into consideration fluctuations in the Companys stock price, any person who has been in compliance with the guidelines as of the end of at least one of the two preceding fiscal years and who has not subsequently sold shares will not be subject to this
holding requirement. For non-employee directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider a directors failure to comply with the Guidelines when considering that director for re-election to the Board of Directors. 12
Ownership
Guidelines
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Our Code of Business Conduct prohibits making contributions on behalf of the Company to political parties, political action committees, political candidates, or holders of public office. The Company is a member of several trade associations which, as part of their overall activities, may engage in
advocacy activities with regard to issues important to the retail industry or the business community generally. Communications with the Board of Directors The Board has established a procedure for shareholders and other interested parties to send communications to the non-management members of the Board of Directors. Shareholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate directly with the non-management directors of the
Company should send a letter to: Board of Directors The Secretary will promptly send a copy of the communication to the lead director, who may direct the Secretary to send a copy of the communication to the other non-management directors and may determine whether a meeting of the non-management directors should be called to review the
communication. A copy of the Procedures for Communications with the Board of Directors is available on the corporate governance section of the Companys corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. You may obtain a printed copy of the procedures by
writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Companys headquarters. The Board of Directors and all of its committees have authority to retain outside advisors and consultants that they consider necessary or appropriate in carrying out their respective responsibilities. The independent accountants are retained by the Audit Committee and report directly to the Audit
Committee. In addition, the Committee is responsible for the selection, assessment, and termination of the internal auditors to which the Company has outsourced a portion of its internal audit function, which is ultimately accountable to the Audit Committee. Similarly, the consultant retained by the
Compensation and Management Resources Committee to assist it in the evaluation of senior executive compensation reports directly to that committee. The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct for directors, officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct is available on the corporate governance section of the Companys
corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. You may obtain a printed copy of the Code of Business Conduct by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Companys headquarters. Any waivers of the Code of Business Conduct for directors and executive officers must be approved by the Audit Committee. We promptly disclose amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and any waivers of the Code for directors and executive officers on the corporate governance section of
the Companys corporate website at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. 13
c/o Secretary, Foot Locker, Inc.
112 West 34th Street
New York, NY 10120
The Board of Directors has responsibility for establishing broad corporate policies, reviewing significant developments affecting Foot Locker, and monitoring the general performance of the Company. Our By-laws provide for a Board of Directors consisting of between 7 and 13 directors. The exact
number of directors is determined from time to time by the entire Board. Our Board currently has 10 members. The Board of Directors held five meetings during 2013. All of our directors attended at least 75 percent of the meetings of the Board and committees on which they served in 2013. The Board of Directors, acting through the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, considers its members, including those directors being nominated for reelection to the Board at the 2014 annual meeting, to be qualified for service on the Board due to a variety of factors reflected in each
directors experience, education, areas of expertise, and experience serving on the boards of directors of other organizations. Generally, the Board seeks individuals of broad-based experience who have the background, judgment, independence, and integrity to represent the shareholders in overseeing the
Companys management in their operation of the business rather than specific, niche areas of expertise. Within this framework, specific items relevant to the Boards determination for each director are listed in each directors biographical information beginning on Page 73. A director is considered independent under the rules of the The New York Stock Exchange if he or she has no material or immaterial relationship to the Company that would impair his or her independence. In addition to the independence criteria established by The New York Stock Exchange, the
Board of Directors has adopted categorical standards to assist it in making its independence determinations regarding individual members of the Board. These categorical standards are contained in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are posted on the Companys corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. The Board of Directors has determined that the categories of relationships listed in the following table are immaterial for purposes of determining whether a director is independent under the listing standards adopted by The New York Stock Exchange. 14
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Categorical Relationship
Description
Investment Relationships with the Company
A director and any family member may own equities or other securities of the Company.
Relationships with Other Business Entities
A director and any family member may be a director, employee (other than an executive officer), or beneficial owner of less than 10 percent of the
shares of a business entity with which the Company does business, provided that the aggregate amount involved in a fiscal year does not exceed the
greater of $1,000,000 or 2 percent of either that entitys or the Companys annual consolidated gross revenue.
Relationships with Not-for-Profit Entities
A director and any family member may be a director or employee (other than an executive officer or the equivalent) of a not-for-profit organization
to which the Company (including the Foot Locker Foundation) makes contributions, provided that the aggregate amount of the Companys
contributions in any fiscal year do not exceed the greater of $1,000,000 or 2 percent of the not-for-profit entitys total annual receipts. The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has determined that the following directors are independent under the rules of The New York Stock Exchange because they have no material or immaterial relationship to the Company that
would impair their independence:
Maxine Clark
Matthew M. McKenna
Nicholas DiPaolo
Steven Oakland
Alan D. Feldman
Cheryl Nido Turpin
Jarobin Gilbert Jr.
Dona D. Young
Guillermo Marmol James E. Preston, Allen Questrom, and David Y. Schwartz served as directors of the Company during 2013 until their retirement from the Board on May 15, 2013. The Board determined, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, that Mr. Preston, Mr.
Questrom, and Mr. Schwartz each was independent under the rules of The New York Stock Exchange through the end of his term as a director because he had no material or immaterial relationship to the Company that would impair his independence. In making its decisions on independence, the Board of Directors reviewed recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and considered the following relationships between the Company and organizations with which the current members of our Board are affiliated:
Nicholas DiPaolos spouse is a trustee of the Greater Paramus Chamber of Commerce Education Foundation, a not-for-profit corporation. The Foot Locker Foundation made a contribution of $5,000 to this organization in 2013. As the amount of the contribution does not exceed the greater of
$1,000,000 or 2 percent of the not-for-profit entitys total annual receipts, this relationship falls under the Companys categorical standards of relationships that are immaterial for purposes of determining director independence because it constitutes a relationship with a not-for-profit entity.
15
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Dona D. Young is a member of the Board of Trustees of Save the Children, a not-for-profit corporation. The Foot Locker Foundation made a contribution of $10,000 to this charitable organization in 2013. As the amount of the contribution does not exceed the greater of $1,000,000 or 2 percent of
the not-for-profit entitys total annual receipts, this relationship falls under the Companys categorical standards of relationships that are immaterial for purposes of determining director independence because it constitutes a relationship with a not-for-profit entity. The Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Management Resources Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent as defined under the listing standards of The New York Stock Exchange and the
director independence standards adopted by the Board. We individually inquire of each of our directors and executive officers about any transactions in which Foot Locker and any of these related persons or their immediate family members are participants. We also make inquiries within the Companys records for information on any of these kinds of
transactions. Once we gather the information, we then review all relationships and transactions in which Foot Locker and any of our directors, executive officers or their immediate family members are participants to determine, based on the facts and circumstances, whether the Company or the related
persons have a direct or indirect material interest. The General Counsels office coordinates the related person review process. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews any reported transactions involving directors and their immediate families in making its recommendation to the
Board of Directors on the independence of the directors. The Companys written policies and procedures for related person transactions are included within the Corporate Governance Guidelines and Foot Lockers Code of Business Conduct. There were no related party transactions in 2013. Committees of the Board of Directors The Board has delegated certain duties to committees, which assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities. There are five standing committees of the Board. Each director serves on at least two committees. The current committee memberships, the number of meetings held during 2013, and the
functions of the committees are described below.
Audit
Compensation
Finance and
Nominating
Executive
G. Marmol, Chair
A. Feldman, Chair
M. McKenna, Chair
D. Young, Chair
K. Hicks, Chair
M. Clark
N. DiPaolo
M. Clark
J. Gilbert Jr.
N. DiPaolo
J. Gilbert Jr.
S. Oakland
N. DiPaolo
S. Oakland
A. Feldman
M. McKenna
C. Turpin
A. Feldman
C. Turpin
G. Marmol
D. Young
G. Marmol
M. McKenna
D. Young The committee held nine meetings in 2013. The Audit Committee has a charter, which is available on the corporate governance section of our corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. The report of the Audit Committee appears on
Page 80. 16
Committee
and
Management
Resources
Committee
Strategic
Planning
Committee
and Corporate
Governance
Committee
Committee
BOARD OF DIRECTORS This committee appoints the independent accountants and is responsible for approving the independent accountants compensation. This committee also assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in the following areas:
accounting policies and practices, the integrity of the Companys financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, risk oversight, the qualifications, independence, and performance of the independent accountants, and the qualifications, performance and compensation of the internal auditors. The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. The Board of Directors has determined that Matthew M. McKenna, qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined under the rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, through his relevant experience as a senior financial executive of a large multinational corporation. Mr. McKenna is
independent under the rules of The New York Stock Exchange and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Compensation and Management Resources Committee The Compensation and Management Resources Committee (the Compensation Committee) held six meetings in 2013. The committee has a charter, which is available on the corporate governance section of the Companys corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, reviews and approves all compensation for the Companys executive management group, which consists of the executive officers and corporate officers, and determines significant elements of the
compensation of the chief executive officers of our operating divisions. Decisions regarding equity compensation for other employees are also the Compensation Committees responsibility. Decisions regarding non-equity compensation of the Companys other associates are made by the Companys
management. The committee also considers risk in relation to the Companys compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee also administers Foot Lockers various compensation plans, including the incentive plans, the equity-based compensation plans, and the employees stock purchase plan. Other than the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, committee members are not eligible to participate in these
compensation plans. This committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning executive development and succession, including for the position of Chief Executive Officer. Each year, the Compensation Committee holds a meeting with management, the Companys compensation consultant, and the Committees independent compensation consultant to review the overall executive compensation environment, including recent developments in executive compensation,
and the Companys executive compensation program, including a historical view of the pay-for-performance correlation in the program and any changes to the program being recommended by management or either of the consultants. The Committee then holds a meeting in March, after the financial results for the prior year have been finalized and audited, to review and approve bonus and incentive compensation payments for the prior year and to review and approve compensation arrangementsbase salaries, stock awards, and
incentive plan targetsfor the upcoming year. The Committee meets privately 17
BOARD OF DIRECTORS with its independent consultant for the purpose of establishing the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, including establishing target awards under the Annual Bonus Plan and the long-term incentive compensation program, and making stock awards to him. Except in the case of promotions or
other unusual circumstances, the Compensation Committee considers stock awards only at its March meeting, which is normally held within a few weeks following the issuance of the Companys full-year earnings release for the prior year. The Committee may hold other meetings during the year to review specific issues related to executive compensation, new developments in executive compensation, or other management resources-related topics. It also has responsibility, along with the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, for annually reviewing compensation paid to non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee has retained as its advisor a nationally recognized executive compensation consultantCompensation Advisory Partnersthat is independent and performs no other work for the Company. Compensation Advisory Partners is retained directly by the Compensation
Committee, reports to it directly, meets with the Committee privately, without management present, and regularly communicates privately with the Chair of the Committee. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Compensation Advisory Partners based on standards promulgated
by the Securities and Exchange Commission and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent it from serving as an independent consultant to the Committee. Each year, the Committees compensation consultant reviews a report on risk in relation to the Companys compensation
policies and practices, provides a pay-for-performance analysis of our executive compensation program, and reviews the Chief Executive Officers compensation. Management utilizes the services of ClearBridge Compensation Group, a nationally recognized compensation consultant, to provide advice on
the executive compensation program and plan design. Management is involved in various aspects of developing the executive compensation program. Our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, Vice PresidentHuman Resources, and staff in the Human Resources Department work with our Chief Executive Officer to develop
compensation recommendations for all corporate officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer or the Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer reviews these proposals with the Chair of the Compensation Committee, and may make changes to the
recommendations based upon his input, before the recommendations are forwarded to the Compensation Committee for review. Our Senior Vice President and General Counsel and Vice President and Associate General Counsel also attend meetings of the Compensation Committee and participate in
some of these discussions and preparations. The Compensation Committee has delegated authority to its Chair to approve stock option awards of up to 25,000 shares to any single employee other than a corporate officer. The Chair generally uses this authority to approve stock option grants made during the course of the year in connection
with promotions or new hires. Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation Nicholas DiPaolo, Alan D. Feldman, James E. Preston, Allen Questrom, Cheryl Nido Turpin, and Dona D. Young served on the Compensation and Management Resources Committee during 2013. None of the committee members was an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries,
and there were no interlocks with other companies within the meaning of the SECs proxy rules. 18
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Finance and Strategic Planning Committee The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee held five meetings in 2013. This committee reviews the overall strategic and financial plans of the Company, including capital expenditure plans, proposed debt or equity issues of the Company, and the Companys capital structure. The committee also
considers and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning dividend payments and share repurchases, and reviews acquisition and divestiture proposals. Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings in 2013. This committee has responsibility for overseeing corporate governance matters affecting the Company, including developing and recommending criteria and policies relating to service and tenure of directors. The
committee is responsible for collecting the names of potential nominees to the Board, reviewing the background and qualifications of potential candidates for Board membership, and making recommendations to the Board for the nomination and election of directors. The committee reviews membership
on the Board committees and, after consultation with the lead director and the Chief Executive Officer, makes recommendations to the Board regarding committee members and committee chair assignments annually. In addition, the committee meets jointly with the Compensation and Management
Resources Committee to review directors compensation and make recommendations to the Board concerning the form and amount of directors compensation. While the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy regarding board diversity, the Foot Locker Board reflects diversity in terms of gender, experience and ethnicity. In selecting new directors and considering the re-nomination of existing directors, the
Committee considers a variety of factors that it believes contribute to an individuals ability to be an effective director, as well as the overall effectiveness of the Board. These include independence, integrity, high personal and professional ethics, sound business judgment, and the ability and willingness to
devote sufficient time to Board responsibilities. The Committee also considers an individuals understanding of business, finance, corporate governance, marketing, and other disciplines relevant to the oversight of a large publicly traded company; understanding of our industry; educational and professional
background; international experience; personal accomplishment; community involvement; and cultural and ethnic diversity. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may establish criteria for candidates for Board membership. These criteria may include area of expertise, diversity of
experience, independence, commitment to representing the long-term interests of the Companys stakeholders, and other relevant factors, taking into consideration the needs of the Board and the Company and the mix of expertise and experience among current directors. From time to time the
committee may retain the services of a third party search firm to identify potential director candidates. After a potential nominee is identified, the Committee Chair will review his or her biographical information and discuss with the other members of the committee whether to request additional information about the individual or to schedule a meeting with the potential candidate. The committees
determination on whether to proceed with a formal evaluation of a potential candidate is based on the persons experience and qualifications, as well as the current composition of the Board and its anticipated future needs. Shareholders who wish to recommend candidates may contact the Committee in the manner described on Page 13 under Communications with the Board of Directors. Shareholder nominations must be made according to the procedures required under our By-laws and within the timeframe
described in the By-laws and on Page 93 of this proxy statement. Shareholder-recommended candidates and shareholder nominees whose nominations comply with these procedures will be evaluated by the Committee in the same manner as the Committees nominees. 19
BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Executive Committee did not meet in 2013. Except for certain matters reserved to the Board, this committee has all of the powers of the Board in the management of the business of the Company during intervals between Board meetings. Directors Compensation and Benefits Non-employee directors are paid an annual retainer fee and meeting fees for attendance at each Board and committee meeting. The lead director and the committee chairs are paid an additional retainer fee for service in these capacities. We do not pay additional compensation to any director who
is also an employee of the Company for service on the Board or any committee. The table below summarizes the fees paid to the non-employee directors in 2013. Summary of Directors Compensation
Annual Retainer
$110,000. The annual retainer is payable 50 percent in cash and 50 percent in shares of our Common Stock. Directors may elect to receive up to 100 percent of their annual retainer, including committee chair retainer, in stock. We calculate the number of
shares paid to the directors for their annual retainer by dividing their retainer fee by the closing price of a share of our stock on the last business day preceding the July payment date.
Committee Chair Retainers
The committee chair retainers are paid in the same form as the annual retainer.
$25,000 Audit Committee Chair
$25,000 Compensation and Management Resources Committee
$15,000 Finance and Strategic Planning Committee Chair
$15,000 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
N/A: Executive Committee
Lead Director Retainer
$50,000 payable in the same form as the annual retainer.
Meeting Fees
$2,000 for attendance at each Board and committee meeting
Restricted Stock Units
In fiscal 2013, the directors received a grant of 1,505 restricted stock units (RSUs). The number of RSUs granted was calculated by dividing $55,000 by the closing price of a share of our stock on the date of grant. The RSUs will vest one year following the
date of grantin May 2014. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of the Companys common stock on the vesting date. Deferral Election Non-employee directors may elect to receive all or a portion of the cash component of their annual retainer fee, including committee chair retainers, in the form of deferred stock units or to have these amounts placed in an interest account. Directors may also elect to receive all or part of the stock
component of their annual retainer fee in the form of deferred stock units. The interest account is a hypothetical investment account bearing interest at the rate of 120 percent of the 20
Chair
Chair
BOARD OF DIRECTORS applicable federal long-term rate, compounded annually, and set as of the first day of each plan year. A stock unit is an accounting equivalent of one share of the Companys Common Stock. Miscellaneous Directors and their immediate families are eligible to receive the same discount on purchases of merchandise from our stores, catalogs and Internet sites that is available to Company employees. The Company reimburses non-employee directors for their reasonable expenses in attending meetings of
the Board and committees, including their transportation expenses to and from meetings, hotel accommodations, and meals. Fiscal 2013 Director Compensation The amounts paid to each non-employee director for fiscal 2013, including amounts deferred under the Companys stock plan, and the RSUs granted to each director are reported in the tables below. Mr. Oakland did not serve as a director during 2013, so no compensation is reported for him in the
table. Director Compensation (a)
(b)
(c)
(d) Name
Fees Earned
Stock
Total M. Clark
80,053
102,468
182,521 N. DiPaolo
110,009
134,999
245,008 A. Feldman
35,625
202,754
(3)(4)
238,379 J. Gilbert Jr.
93,022
109,986
203,008 G. Marmol
105,515
122,493
228,008 M. McKenna
38,025
172,483
210,508 S. Oakland
J. Preston
38,945
27,472
66,417 A. Questrom
38,945
28,203
67,148 D. Schwartz
40,061
37,576
77,637 C. Turpin
32,583
192,066
(3)(4)
224,649 D. Young
78,000
169,694
(4)
247,694 Notes to Director Compensation Table
(1)
Column (c) reflects the following three bulleted items:
Retainer fees paid in stock or deferred by the director. The fiscal 2013 grant date fair value for the portion of the annual retainer fees, including committee chair retainer fees and the lead director retainer fee, paid in shares of the Companys common stock or deferred by the director, as shown in
the following table: 21
or Paid in Cash
($)
Awards
($)(1)(2)
($)
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Name
Number of
Number of
Grant Date M. Clark
1,351
47,461 N. DiPaolo
2,277
79,991 A. Feldman
3,749.8243
129,375 J. Gilbert Jr.
1,565
54,978 G. Marmol
1,921
67,485 M. McKenna
3,344
117,475 S. Oakland
J. Preston
782
27,472 A. Questrom
782
27,472 D. Schwartz
889
31,231 C. Turpin
3,055.4124
105,417 D. Young
2,134.9274
75,000 - Stock portion of retainer fee: In 2013, we made the annual stock payment to each director on July 1. Under the terms of the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, the stock payment was valued at the closing price of a share of the Companys common stock on June 28, which was $35.13. The 2013 grant
date fair value is equal to the number of shares received or deferred by the director multiplied by $35.13, calculated in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules (ASC Topic 718). Directors who deferred the stock portion of their annual retainer were credited with deferred stock
units on the annual payment date valued at $35.13 per unit. - Cash portion of retainer fee: For fiscal 2013, two directors deferred part of the cash portion of their annual retainer fees and were credited during the fiscal year with deferred stock units on the quarterly cash retainer payment dates, valued at the fair market value on the payment dates, as
follows: January 2, 2013 ($31.60; pro rated for 2 months of fiscal year), April 1, 2013 ($33.82), July 1, 2013 ($35.36), and October 1, 2013 ($34.01). The 2013 grant date fair value is equal to the number of deferred stock units received multiplied by the fair market value on the payment dates,
calculated in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules (ASC Topic 718).
Dividend equivalents. The fiscal 2013 grant date fair value for dividend equivalents credited in the form of additional stock units to five directors during the year on the quarterly dividend payment dates, valued at the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the dividend payment
dates, as shown in the following table. Name
05/03/13
08/02/13
11/01/13
01/31/14 A. Feldman
117.5291
124.6225
136.4340
124.3812 D. Schwartz
179.8530
A. Questrom
20.7185
C. Turpin
212.9243
212.9576
230.6058
210.2336 D. Young
269.8295
268.0390
287.3434
261.9589 22
Shares
Deferred
Stock
Units
Fair Value
($)
FMV:
$35.28
FMV:
$37.31
FMV:
$34.99
FMV:
$38.60
BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Total Number of Deferred Stock Units credited to directors accounts for fiscal 2013, including the dividend equivalents and the units credited representing 2013 retainer fees reported in the above two tables, and the total number of units held at the end of fiscal 2013, are reported in the
following table: Name
Total # of
Total # of A. Feldman
4,252.7911
24,129.9493 D. Schwartz
179.8530
14,735.8533 A. Questrom
20.7185
C. Turpin
3,922.1337
40,785.3239 D. Young
3,222.0982
50,820.0216
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). The fiscal 2013 grant date fair value for the RSUs granted to the nonemployee directors in 2013 is shown in the following table. The number of RSUs granted was calculated by dividing $55,000 by $36.55, which was the closing price of a share of our stock on the
date of grant. The RSUs will vest in May 2014. As provided under the SECs rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, please refer to Note 22 to the Companys financial
statements in our 2013 Form 10-K. The following table shows the aggregate number of RSUs granted in 2013 and the number of RSUs outstanding at the end of the 2013 fiscal year: Name
Number of RSUs
Grant Date
Number of RSUs M. Clark
1,505
55,008
1,505 N. DiPaolo
1,505
55,008
1,505 A. Feldman
1,505
55,008
1,505 J. Gilbert Jr.
1,505
55,008
1,505 G. Marmol
1,505
55,008
1,505 M. McKenna
1,505
55,008
1,505 S. Oakland
J. Preston
A. Questrom
D. Schwartz
C. Turpin
1,505
55,008
1,505 D. Young
1,505
55,008
1,505
(2)
No stock options were granted to the nonemployee directors in 2013. The following table provides information on the number of stock options outstanding for each of the nonemployee directors at the end of the 2013 fiscal year, all of which are exercisable: 23
Units
Credited for
2013
Units
Held at
02/01/14
Granted
Fair Value
($)
Outstanding on
2/1/2014
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Name
Number of Stock Options M. Clark
N. DiPaolo
6,317 A. Feldman
6,314 J. Gilbert Jr.
6,317 G. Marmol
M. McKenna
4,287 Steven Oakland
J. Preston
A. Questrom
D. Schwartz
6,317 C. Turpin
6,317 D. Young
6,317
(3)
Quarterly cash payments for part of fiscal 2013 deferred in the form of stock units under Foot Lockers Stock Incentive Plan. (4) Stock payment deferred in the form of stock units under Foot Lockers Stock Incentive Plan. Directors Retirement Plan The Directors Retirement Plan was frozen as of December 31, 1995. Consequently, only Jarobin Gilbert Jr. and James E. Preston remained entitled to receive a benefit under this plan when their service as directors ends because they had completed at least five years of service as directors on
December 31, 1995. The retirement benefit under this plan is an annual retirement benefit of $24,000 that is payable quarterly for a period of 10 years after the director leaves the Board or until their death, if sooner. Mr. Preston retired from the Board in May 2013, and he is currently receiving a benefit
under this plan. Directors and Officers Indemnification and Insurance We have purchased directors and officers liability and corporation reimbursement insurance from a group of insurers comprising ACE American Insurance Co., Zurich American Insurance Co., Arch Insurance Co., St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co., Freedom Specialty Insurance Co., Berkley Insurance Co.,
Navigators Insurance Co., Aspen American Insurance Co., XL Insurance Bermuda Ltd., and Illinois National Insurance Co. These policies insure the Company and all of the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries. They also insure all of the directors and officers of the Company and the covered subsidiaries.
The policies were written for a term of 12 months, from October 12, 2013 until October 12, 2014. The total annual premium for these policies, including fees and taxes, is $1,050,835. Directors and officers of the Company, as well as all other employees with fiduciary responsibilities under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, are insured under policies issued by a group of insurers comprising Arch Insurance Co., St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co., Federal Insurance Co., and Continental Casualty Co., which have a total premium, including fees and taxes, of $367,988 for the 12-
month period ending October 12, 2014. The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and officers, as approved by shareholders at the 1987 annual meeting. 24
Outstanding on 2/1/2014
The Company has completed a risk-related review and assessment of our compensation program and considered whether our executive compensation is reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the Company. As part of this review, the independent compensation consultant to the
Compensation and Management Resources Committee reviewed risk in relation to the Companys compensation policies and practices with the Companys human resources executives directly involved in compensation matters. The consultant reviewed the compensation policies and practices in effect for
corporate and division employees through the manager level, store managers, and store associates and reviewed the features we have built into the compensation programs to discourage excessive risk taking by employees, including a balance between different elements of compensation, differing time
periods for different elements, consistent Company-wide programs, plan performance targets based on the corporate budgeting process, and stock ownership guidelines for senior management. Compensation Discussion and Analysis This section explains our executive compensation program as it relates to the following named executive officers whose compensation information is presented in the tables following this discussion and analysis:
Ken C. Hicks
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Lauren B. Peters
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Richard A. Johnson
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Robert W. McHugh
Executive Vice PresidentOperations Support
Paulette R. Alviti
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate, and retain talented retail company executives in order to maintain and enhance the Companys performance and its return to shareholders. In order to accomplish this, we have a compensation program for our executives that ties pay
closely to performance. The more senior an executives position, the greater the portion of his or her compensation that is tied to performance. The Compensation and Management Resources Committee (the Compensation Committee), composed of five independent directors, oversees the executive
compensation program. 2013 Summary This summary is intended to highlight certain features of our performance and our executive compensation program in 2013. Please refer to the entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis that follows the 2013 Summary for more detailed and specific information on our program. Our 2013 Results. In 2013, for the third year in a row, we achieved record sales, earnings, and earnings per share in our history as an athletic footwear and apparel company. Results included:
Net income, on a non-GAAP basis, of $432 million or earnings-per-share of $2.87, a 16 percent increase over 2012 End-of-year market capitalization of $5.6 billion, an 8 percent increase over year-end 2012 Total dividend payments to shareholders of $118 million Total share repurchases of $229 million Total shareholder return (stock price appreciation plus reinvested dividends) of 13.6 percent. 25
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION These results represent continued strong progress toward the long-term objectives contained in the updated long-range strategic plan that we adopted in early 2012, as shown in the following table:
Financial Metrics
2012
2013
Long-Term Sales
$6,101 million
$6,505 million
$7,500 million Sales per Gross Square Foot
$443
$460
$500 Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) Margin
9.9%
10.4%
11% Net Income Margin
6.2%
6.6%
7% Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
14.2%
14.1%
14% The above table represents non-GAAP results. There is a reconciliation to GAAP on Pages 16-18 of our 2013 Form 10-K. Base Salaries. The Chief Executive Officers base salary was unchanged in 2013 from 2012. As part of the Compensation Committees normal annual compensation review, the other named executive officers (other than Ms. Alviti) received base salary increases ranging from 3.2 to 10 percent, which were
based on the executives performance and a position-oriented analysis of peer group salaries. Ms. Alviti joined the Company in June 2013, and her base salary was established based upon the salary range for her position and her prior experience and compensation level. Annual Bonus. Both our annual bonus and long-term incentive programs are formula-driven, with targets established by the Compensation Committee based upon financial targets included in the business plan approved each year by our Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and Board of Directors.
Our annual and long-term bonus programs for the named executive officers pay out based upon the Companys results, without individual performance adjustments. At the beginning of 2013, the Compensation Committee established a performance target under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the Annual Bonus Plan) based on the Company achieving pre-tax income of $666.1 million, a 6.8 percent increase over 2012 pre-tax income. In 2013, the Company
achieved adjusted pre-tax income of $665.5 million, a 6.7 percent increase over 2012, and slightly less than the target, which resulted in annual cash bonuses slightly below the target payout of 124.1 percent of base salary for the Chief Executive Officer, 74.5 percent of base salary for the Chief Operating
Officer, 64.5 percent of base salary for the other executive vice presidents, and 50 percent for Ms. Alviti (whose first year annual bonus was guaranteed at target). Long-Term Incentive Programs. At the beginning of 2012, the Compensation Committee established performance targets for the 2012-13 performance period under the long-term incentive program. The amount earned for the two-year 2012-2013 performance period will not be paid to participants until
2015, following the completion of an additional one-year holding period. The targets that the Committee established were based on the Company achieving average annual net income of $346.2 million (which accounts for 70% of the payout) and ROIC of 12.8 percent (which accounts for 30% of the
payout). For the period, the Company achieved average annual net income of $418.6 million and ROIC of 15.0 percent. As a result, the named executive officers earned a maximum payout for the performance period - for Mr. Hicks, 350 percent of initial base salary; for Mr. Johnson 200 percent of initial
base salary; and for the other named executive officers, 150 percent of initial base salary. Payouts will be calculated and made one-half in cash and one-half in restricted stock units (RSUs). Ms. Alvitis payout under the long-term program is pro rated based upon her period of service with the Company
as a percentage of the total performance period. In 2013, the Compensation Committee established long-term incentive performance targets for the 2013-2014 performance period based upon net income (70%) and ROIC (30%) denominated one-half in cash and one-half in RSUs. The Committee will determine whether payouts have been earned for that
performance period following the end of 2014. If payouts are earned, they will be calculated 26
Objectives
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION one-half in cash and one-half in RSUs, and payment will be made to participating executives in 2016 following an additional one-year holding period. Our annual bonus and long-term incentive programs are performance-based. When we meet or exceed our targets, payments are made to participants, including the named executive officers. When we do not, no payments are made. Following is a five-year history of bonus payments to our named
executive officers:
Annual Bonus Plan Payout
Long-Term Bonus Plan Payout
2013
Slightly Below Target
2012-13: Maximum
2012
Between Target and Maximum
2011-12: Maximum
2011
Maximum
2010-11: Maximum
2009-11: Maximum
2010
Maximum
2008-10: Between Threshold and Target
2009
No Payout
2007-09: No Payout Stock Options. The Compensation Committee granted stock options to each of the named executive officers in 2013. As part of its normal annual compensation review, the Committee awarded options to purchase the number of shares of common stock to each of the named executive officers shown in
the following chart:
Executive
Number of Options
Assumed Black-Scholes Value
Mr. Hicks
280,000
$
3,012,800
Mr. Johnson
47,000
$
505,720
Mr. McHugh and Ms. Peters
42,000
$
451,920 When determining the number of stock options to grant, the Compensation Committee considered an assumed Black-Scholes value, shown in the chart, which was based on the closing price of a share of the Companys common stock in the 20 trading day period ending 10 days prior to the date the
Committee met to authorize these awards. The option exercise price, as well as the actual Black-Scholes value of the awards, is based upon the closing price of a share of the Companys common stock on the grant date. All of the options granted have a three-year vesting schedule, with one-third of each
option grant vesting on the first, second, and third anniversary of the grant date, subject to continuous service through each vesting date. Ms. Alviti. When she joined the Company in June 2013, Ms. Alviti was awarded a stock option grant of 21,000 options, vesting in three equal annual installments, the same number of options granted to the Companys other Senior Vice Presidents in 2013. As additional sign-on compensation to
compensate her for incentive compensation and stock and other awards she forfeited upon termination of her employment with her prior employer, Ms. Alviti received (i) a cash payment of $126,563 and 6,718 restricted stock units, to be payable and vest in March 2014, comparable to a pro-rated
payout under the long-term incentive program payable to other senior executives in 2014, and (ii) a restricted stock award of 30,000 shares, vesting in three equal annual installments. Special Stock Awards to Mr. Hicks. In addition to the stock option award made to Mr. Hicks as part of the Compensation Committees normal annual compensation review, as shown in the chart above, in 2013 the Compensation Committee also made two special stock awards to Mr. Hicks. These were
made in light of the Companys performance in 2012, when, under the leadership of Mr. Hicks, the Company achieved record sales, earnings, earnings per share, and return-on-invested-capital in our history as an athletic footwear and apparel company. These awards were: 27
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Type of Award
Number of Shares
Value
Vesting
Stock Option
232,000
$2,614,014
50% in March 2015
50% in March 2016
Restricted Stock
74,000
$2,533,760
50% in March 2015
50% in March 2016 The value shown for the stock option award is the assumed Black-Scholes value; the value shown for the restricted stock award is the fair market value of the Companys stock on the grant date. Key Compensation Policies. In addition to the specific compensation programs outlined above, the Company has adopted a number of other policies related to executive compensation:
Independent Consultant. With regard to executive compensation matters, our Compensation Committee directly retains, and is advised by, an independent compensation consultant who performs no other work for the Company. No Gross-Ups. We do not provide a tax gross-up with regard to any compensation, benefit, or perquisite paid by the Company, other than our executive relocation program that is applicable to all executives. We also do not provide tax gross-ups for any amount paid to an executive upon
termination of employment or a change-in-control. Stock Ownership Guidelines. We have stock ownership guidelines for our senior executives. These are set at six times annual salary for the Chief Executive Officer, three times annual salary for executive vice presidents, two times annual salary for senior vice presidents and divisional chief executive
officers, and one-half times annual salary for vice presidents and divisional managing directors. If an executive has not met the ownership requirements following a five-year phase-in period, the executive is required to hold 100 percent of net shares acquired from the vesting of restricted stock or
RSUs or the exercise of stock options until the stock ownership guidelines are achieved. Long-Term Incentive Program Performance Gate. With regard to the long-term incentive program, the Compensation Committee has established a performance gate so that no amounts will be paid out under the program unless the Companys average annual after-tax income for the
performance period exceeds the Companys after-tax income in the year prior to the commencement of the performance period. 2013 Say-on-Pay Vote. At our 2013 annual meeting, 97 percent of shareholders voting on the advisory vote on executive compensation supported the executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee considered the results of the 2013 say-on-pay vote and shareholders strong support of
our executive compensation program in reviewing the executive compensation program for 2014. In light of this, the Compensation Committee decided to retain the general overall program design, which ties executive pay closely with Company performance. In the future, the Compensation Committee
will continue to consider the executive compensation program in light of changing circumstances and shareholder feedback. Our Say-on-Pay vote is currently held on an annual basis, consistent with the views expressed by a majority of our shareholders at our 2011 annual meeting. In the balance of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we provide greater detail about our compensation program for the named executive officers. * * * 28
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION What are the objectives of our compensation program? The objectives of our compensation program are to attract, motivate, and retain talented retail industry executives in order to maintain and enhance the Companys performance and its return to shareholders. What is our compensation program designed to reward? We have designed our compensation program to align the financial interests of our executives, including the named executive officers, with those of our shareholders. It is designed to reward the overall effort and contribution of our executives as measured by the Companys performance in relation to
targets established by the Compensation Committee, more than individual performance. Key concepts underlying our program are:
Balance. Executive compensation should be balanced between annual and long-term compensation and between cash and equity-based compensation. Align Interests of Executives and Shareholders. The compensation program should align the interests of executives with those of the Companys shareholders by rewarding both increases in the Companys share price and the achievement of performance goals that contribute to the Companys long-
term health and growth. Strong Relationship to Company Performance. A substantial portion of the compensation of our executives, whether paid out currently or on a long-term basis, should depend on the Companys performance. The Compensation of Our Senior Executives Has Greater Risk. More-senior executives should have a greater portion of their compensation at risk, whether through performance-based incentive programs or through stock price appreciation. What are our elements of compensation? The elements of compensation for the named executive officers are:
base salary performance-based annual cash bonus performance-based long-term incentive, payable in a combination of cash and RSUs long-term equity-based compensation (stock options and, in special situations, restricted stock) retirement and other benefits perquisites Why do we pay each element of compensation and how do we determine the amount for each element of compensation, or the formula that determines the amount? We have established benchmarks for base salary and total compensation for each named executive officer. These benchmarks are reviewed annually and are based upon compensation for comparable positions in a peer group consisting of 20 national retail companies with annual sales of approximately
$1 billion to $10 billion. The Compensation Committee determined that these companies were the appropriate peer group for executive compensation purposes based upon the nature of their business, their revenues, and the pool from which they recruit their executives. In 2013, we removed three companies from the peer groupCollective Brands Inc., Charming Shoppes, and Talbots Inc.because they were no longer publicly traded. In 2012, we had removed companiesBorders Group, Inc. and Timberland Co.for the same reason. In order to maintain a peer group of
reasonable size, in 2013 we added five companies: Ascena Retail Group, Inc., Bed, 29
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Bath & Beyond, Inc., DSW, Inc., GameStop Corp., and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. The 20 companies included in the peer group were:
Abercrombie & Fitch
Family Dollar Stores
Aeropostale, Inc.
Finish Line Inc.
American Eagle Outfitters Inc.
GameStop Corp.
ANN INC.
Genesco Inc.
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.
L Brands Inc.
Bed, Bath & Beyond Inc.
Quiksilver Inc.
Brown Shoe Company, Inc.
Radioshack Corp.
Dicks Sporting Goods Inc.
Ross Stores Inc.
Dillards Inc.
Saks Inc.
DSW Inc.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. Saks Inc. is no longer a publicly traded company, and we removed it from the peer group for 2014. The goal of the Compensation Committee is to provide competitive total compensation opportunities for the named executive officers that vary with Company performance. The Committee uses the peer group benchmark information as a reference point in evaluating executive compensation, but does
not attempt to match the compensation of each executive position in the Company precisely with that of an equivalent position in the peer group. In general, the Committee attempts to position an executives total compensation between the median and 75th percentile of comparable positions at peer
companies, consistent with the Companys revenues in relation to the peer companies. The Committee also takes into consideration factors such as performance, responsibility, experience, and length of time an executive has served in a position. Base Salaries We pay base salaries to provide our named executive officers with current, regular compensation that is appropriate to their position, experience, and responsibilities. We pay higher base salaries to those named executive officers with greater overall responsibility. Other than Mr. Hicks, whose base salary
did not change in 2013 from 2012, and Ms. Alviti, the other named executive officers received base salary increases in 2013 that ranged from 3.2 percent to 10 percent. These increases were determined based principally upon the executives performance and his or her salary as compared to salaries for
comparable positions in the peer group. Ms. Alvitis base salary was established when she joined the Company in June 2013 based upon the salary range for her position and her prior experience and compensation. Performance-Based Annual Cash Bonus We pay performance-based annual cash bonuses to our named executive officers under the Annual Bonus Plan in order to provide incentive for them to work toward the Companys achievement of annual performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. Payments are calculated as a
percentage of actual base salary earned by the executive during the year. Our Annual Bonus Plan allows the Compensation Committee, in establishing performance targets under the plan, to choose one or more performance measures from a list of ten factors that have been approved by our shareholders. For 2013, for the named executive officers, the Compensation
Committee established a performance target under the Annual Bonus Plan based upon the Companys achievement of a prescribed level of pre-tax income. All bonus targets and calculations are based on the results of continuing operations. The performance targets established by the 30
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Compensation Committee are based upon the business plan and budget reviewed and approved each year by the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board of Directors. The Annual Bonus Plan targets and the actual amount of adjusted pre-tax profit achieved for 2013 were as follows:
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Actual Pre-tax profit
$599.5 million
$666.1 million
$799.3 million
$665.5 million Bonus payouts are calculated on the basis of straight-line interpolation between the threshold, target, and maximum points. Target payments under the Annual Bonus Plan for the named executive officers and actual payments for 2013 based upon the Companys performance were as follows:
Target
Range
Actual 2013
Actual 2013
Mr. Hicks
125% of Base Salary
31.25 % to 218.75% of
Base Salary
124.1 of Base Salary
$1,365,375
Ms. Peters
65% of Base Salary
16.25% to 113.75% of
Base Salary
64.5% of Base Salary
$346,929
Mr. Johnson
75% of Base Salary
18.75% to 131.25% of
Base Salary
74.5% of Base Salary
$660,966
Mr. McHugh
65% of Base Salary
16.25% to 113.75% of
Base Salary
64.5% of Base Salary
$419,543
Ms. Alviti
50% of Base Salary
12.5% to 87.5% of
Base Salary
50% of Base Salary
$150,000 If the Company does not achieve threshold performance, then no annual bonus is paid. Executives who do not receive a meets expectations rating or higher in their annual performance review are ineligible to receive an annual bonus payment. Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Program We pay performance-based long-term incentives to our named executive officers in order to provide incentive for them to work toward the Companys achievement of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee for each performance period. The long-term incentive program is based
on the following principles:
Balance between Cash and RSUs. Awards are denominated 50 percent in cash, payable under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, and 50 percent in RSUs, payable under the Stock Incentive Plan. The same performance target is established for both the cash and RSU portions of the award. Two-year Performance Period and One-year Holding Period. The performance period is two years; however, while award payouts are calculated following the end of the two-year performance period, payments require continued employment and are subject to forfeiture, as well as stock price
fluctuations, for another yearthat is, payments are not made until the end of a three-year period. Net Income and ROIC Targets. The performance target is based on net income (70 percent) and ROIC (30 percent). These performance targets are based upon net income and ROIC contained in the business and financial plan and budget adopted by the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee
and the Board of Directors for the relevant period. 31
Percentage
Payout
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Target Awards are Percentage of Base Salary. The target awards are expressed as a percentage of initial base salarythat is, the base salary paid to the executive following the salary adjustments that take place on May 1 of the first year of the performance period. The Chief Executive Officers target
award is 175 percent of initial base salary; the Chief Operating Officers, 100 percent of initial base salary; and the other named executive officers, 75 percent of initial base salary. In 2012, the Compensation Committee established the net income and ROIC targets for the 2012-2013 performance period. The targets, along with the adjusted actual performance for the period, are shown in the table below:
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Actual Average Annual Net Income
$279 million
$346 million
$415 million
$419 million Two-year Average ROIC
10.9%
12.8%
14.7%
15.0% The target payment level, possible range of payments, and actual payout, based on the Companys actual performance measured against these performance goals were as follows:
Target
Range
Actual
Mr. Hicks
175% of Initial
Base Salary
43.75% to 350% of Initial Base Salary
350% of Initial Base Salary
Mr. Johnson
100% of Initial
Base Salary
25% to 200% of Initial Base Salary
200% of Initial Base Salary
Other Named Executive Officers
75% of Initial
Base Salary
18.75% to 150% of Initial Base Salary
150% of Initial Base Salary The payout to Ms. Alviti was made on a pro rata basis. As noted above, the awards are denominated one-half in cash and one-half in RSUs. There is a one-year holding period, so that the payouts will not be made to executives until 2015. The RSUs allocated to each executive were valued at the closing price on the date of grant. The actual cash and RSU
calculations for each of the named executive officers for the 2012-13 performance period were as follows:
Cash
RSUs Mr. Hicks
$
1,925,000
62,258 Ms. Peters
$
375,000
12,129 Mr. Johnson
$
850,000
27,491 Mr. McHugh
$
476,250
15,403 Ms. Alviti
$
112,041
3,270 In 2010, we made a change to our long-term incentive program. For years prior to 2010, the long-term incentive was determined based upon performance over a three-year performance measurement period and was paid in cash. Beginning in 2010, the long-term incentive is determined based upon
performance over a two-year performance measurement period, with an additional one-year holding period, and the award is denominated one-half in cash and one-half in RSUs. Consequently the Summary Compensation Table reflects two long-term incentives for 2011the 2009-2011 three-year
performance measurement period under the old program and the 2010-2011 performance measurement period under the new program. The Summary Compensation Table reflects more normalized non-equity incentive plan compensation for 2012 and 2013. 32
(weighted 70%)
(weighted 30%)
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Provisions Applicable to All Performance Periods ROIC is a non-GAAP financial measure. For purposes of calculating the long-term bonus, we define ROIC as follows: ROIC =
Operating Profit after Taxes
Average Invested Capital
Operating Profit after Taxes (Numerator) = Average Invested Capital (Denominator) = Pre-tax income Average total assets +/- interest expense/income - average cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments + implied interest portion of operating lease payments - average year-end inventory +/- Unusual/non-recurring items - non-interest-bearing current liabilities + Long-term bonus expense + 13-month average inventory = Earnings before long-term bonus expense, interest and taxes + average estimated asset base of capitalized operating leases - Estimated income tax expense = Operating Profit after Taxes = Average Invested Capital Certain items used in the calculation of ROIC for bonus purposes, such as the implied interest portion of operating lease payments, certain unusual or non-recurring items, average estimated asset base of capitalized operating leases, and 13-month average inventory, while calculated from our financial
records, cannot be calculated from our audited financial statements. Prior to the Compensation Committees determining whether bonus targets have been achieved, the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, at the request, and for the restricted use, of the Compensation Committee,
reviews the bonus calculations. There is a calculation of basic ROIC, which is not precisely the same as the calculation used for incentive compensation purposes because of the exclusion of certain extraordinary items (see discussion below of disregarded items), and a reconciliation to GAAP, on Pages 16-
18 of our 2013 Form 10-K. Items Disregarded for Annual and Long-Term Bonus Calculations Under normal circumstances, the Compensation Committee has no discretion to increase annual bonus or long-term incentive payments, which are formula-driven based upon Company performance, and our program for the named executive officers does not provide for discretionary adjustments based
upon individual performance. The Compensation Committee has not adjusted, either upward or downward, any of the annual bonus or long-term incentive payments to the named executive officers shown in the summary compensation table from pay-outs calculated based upon the applicable formula.
When determining bonus and incentive payments, consistent with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Committee is required to disregard certain events that it determines to be unusual or non-recurring. When establishing the targets, the Committee normally specifies certain items that it
considers to be unusual or non-recurring, and these events, if they occur, are automatically excluded when calculating payments. All of the references in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis to target and actual performance levels refer to amounts after taking into consideration these adjustments. 33
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Long-Term Equity-Based Awards A. Stock Options We grant stock options to our named executive officers to align their interests more closely with those of our shareholders. Equity grants are the responsibility of the Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors. The Committee awards stock options with exercise prices
equal to the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant. Therefore, executives who receive stock options will only realize value if there is appreciation in the share price. Stock option grants of the same size are normally made each year to executives holding comparable positions, with larger awards being made to those with greater responsibility. Beginning in 2012, the Compensation Committee has determined the number of options granted on a fixed value basis, using
assumed Black-Scholes values, rather than the fixed share basis used in prior years. Under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, fair market value is defined as the closing price on the grant date. The Compensation Committee has not granted options with an exercise price of less than the fair market value on
the grant date. Options normally vest at the rate of one-third of the total grant per year over the first three years of the ten-year option term, subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances. The Compensation Committee does not normally consider an executives gains from prior stock awards in
making new awards. B. Restricted Stock Units As noted above in our discussion of the Performance-Based Long-Term Bonus Incentives, one-half of the long-term incentive award is denominated in RSUs. C. Restricted Stock We normally make restricted stock awards only in special circumstances, such as related to promotions, special performance, or retention, rather than as part of an executives normal compensation package. In 2013, the Compensation Committee made two restricted stock awards to named executive
officers: an award of 74,000 shares to Mr. Hicks in recognition of the Companys performance in 2012 under his leadership and an award of 30,000 shares to Ms. Alviti as compensation for the value of stock and other awards which she forfeited upon termination of her employment with her prior
employer. Other Related Policies A. Stock Ownership Guidelines We have stock ownership guidelines for our senior executives. These are set at six times annual salary for the Chief Executive Officer, three times annual salary for executive vice presidents, two times annual salary for senior vice presidents and divisional chief executive officers, and one-half times annual
salary for vice presidents and divisional managing directors. If an executive has not met the ownership requirements following a five-year phase-in period, the executive is required to hold 100 percent of net shares acquired from the vesting of restricted stock or RSUs or the exercise of stock options until
the stock ownership guidelines are achieved. At the end of 2013, all of the named executive officers met the stock ownership requirements. B. Anti-Hedging Policy We do not permit our executive officers to take short or long positions in our shares or to hedge their economic interest in their shares. 34
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION C. Clawback Policy We do not have a formal policy with regard to the adjustment or recovery of bonus or incentive payments if it is determined, at a future date, that the relevant performance measures upon which the payments were based must be restated or adjusted. We do, however, have in place other established
practices to address this. In particular, annual bonus payments are not made until after our independent auditors have completed their audit for the fiscal year to which the payments relate and presented the results of their audit to our Audit Committee; an executive who does not receive an annual
performance review rating of Meets Expectations or above is ineligible to receive an annual bonus payment; there is a one-year holding period under the long-term incentive program so that cash payments and RSU distributions are not made until our independent auditors have completed their audit
of both the performance period and the year following the performance period, and presented the results of their audits to our Audit Committee; and we have the ability to adjust future bonus, incentive, and equity grant opportunities downward to adjust for over-payments in prior years. We expect to
establish a formal policy on clawbacks once the Securities and Exchange Commission has issued final clawback rules. Retirement and Other Benefits A. Retirement Plan and Excess Cash Balance Plan All United States-based associates of the Company who meet the eligibility requirements are participants in the Foot Locker Retirement Plan. The Retirement Plan and the method of calculating benefits payable under it are described on Page 68. All of the named executive officers, other than Ms. Alviti,
who has not yet met the service requirements for eligibility, are participants in the Retirement Plan. The Internal Revenue Code limits the amount of compensation that may be taken into consideration in determining an individuals retirement benefits. Therefore, those participants in the Retirement Plan
whose compensation exceeds the Internal Revenue Code limit are also participants in the Excess Cash Balance Plan, described on Page 68, which provides a benefit equal to the difference between the amount a participant receives from the Retirement Plan and the amount the participant would have
received were it not for the Internal Revenue Code limits. B. 401(k) Plan The Company maintains a 401(k) Plan for its eligible U.S. associates, and all of the named executive officers other than Ms. Alviti, who has not yet met the service requirement, participate in it. The 401(k) Plan permits participants to contribute the lesser of 40 percent of eligible compensation or the limit
prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code to the 401(k) Plan on a before-tax basis. The Company will match 25 percent of the first 4 percent of pay that is contributed to the 401(k) Plan, and the Summary Compensation Table on Page 41 includes, in All Other Compensation, the amount of the Company
match for each of the named executive officers. The Company match is made in shares of Company stock, valued on the last trading day of the plan year. Participants in the 401(k) Plan may diversify their matching contributions at any time into any of the other investment options available under the
plan. C. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan The Company maintains a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), described on Page 69, for certain senior officers of the Company and other key employees, including the named executive officers. The SERP is an unfunded plan that sets an annual target incentive award for each participant
consisting of a percentage of base salary and annual bonus based on the Companys performance against target. Contributions range from 4 percent to 12 percent of salary and annual bonus, depending on the Companys performance against an established target, with an 8 percent 35
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION contribution being made for target performance. The Compensation Committee establishes the SERP target each year, and it is normally the same as the performance target under the Annual Bonus Plan. Participant accounts accrue simple interest at the rate of 6 percent annually. The SERP also provides
for the continuation of medical and dental insurance benefits to vested participants following their retirement. Based upon the Companys performance in 2013, a credit of 7.944 percent of 2013 base salary and annual bonus was made to the SERP for each of the named executive officers. As of the end of 2013, the account balances of the named executive officers ranged from approximately $45,550 for Ms. Alviti
to $1.5 million for Mr. Hicks. Under the terms of the SERP, executives are vested in their account balances based upon a combination of age and service. As of the end of 2013, all of the named executive officers were vested in the SERP other than Ms. Alviti, who had not yet met the plans age and
service vesting requirements. The Retirement Plan takes into account only base salary and annual bonus in determining pension benefits. Credits to the SERP are based only on base salary and annual bonus. Therefore, long-term incentives, stock options, and stock awards have no effect on the calculation of benefits or payments
under these plans. Perquisites We provide the named executive officers with certain perquisites, which the Compensation Committee believes to be reasonable and consistent with its overall objective of attracting and retaining talented retail industry executives. The Company provides the named executive officers with an automobile
allowance, financial planning, medical expense reimbursement, annual physical, supplemental long-term disability insurance, and life insurance. In addition, the Company reimburses Mr. Hicks for the reasonable expenses of using a car service for transportation in the New York metropolitan area. We do
not provide a gross-up to executives for the income tax liability they incur due to their receipt of these perquisites. In 2013, we provided a one-time tax gross-up to Ms. Alviti in connection with our reimbursement to her of certain relocation expenses that she was required to repay to her former
employer. How does each element of compensation fit into our overall compensation objectives? How does each element affect our decisions regarding other elements? As stated at the beginning of this discussion and analysis, the objectives of our compensation program are to attract, motivate, and retain talented retail industry executives in order to maintain and enhance the Companys performance and its return to shareholders.
Base salaries aid in attracting and retaining talented retail company executives by providing fixed pay commensurate with their position, experience and responsibilities. The performance-based annual and long-term incentive plans are designed to reward executives for enhancing the Companys performance through the achievement of performance targets. Equity awards are designed to reward executives for increasing our return to our shareholders through increases in our stock price. Equity awards may, in addition, serve to help retain key executives. Base salaries of named executive officers rarely change materially from year-to-year unless there has been a promotion, other change in responsibility, or other special factors apply. Bonus target payouts, both annual and long-term, are established by level of position. Mr. Hicks annual bonus target is
specified in his employment agreement. In determining total compensation, stock options are valued using the Black-Scholes model. Awards of RSUs and restricted stock awards are valued 36
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION based upon the share price at the time of grant. The goal of the Compensation Committee is to balance annual, mid-term, and long-term compensation opportunities, as well as balance the mix of cash and equity in the executive compensation program. Compensation Plans and Risk We believe that our compensation program encourages our named executive officers to take energetic action to improve the Companys performance without encouraging them to take undue risk. The annual bonus and long-term incentive elements of the program are paid based upon performance as
compared to the Companys annual and two-year business plans, which are prepared each year by the Companys management and reviewed and approved by the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board of Directors. While in some years these business plans have proven to be
aggressiveas shown in hindsight when the plans are not achieved and bonuses are not paidour history suggests that, on balance, they are reasonably achievable under normal business conditions. This encourages our executives to manage the business well without pressuring them to take undue risks in
order to obtain a bonus payment. Our equity-based compensation for the named executive officers is designed with a similar goal in mind. We believe that our equity grants are reasonable in relation to overall compensation. Stock options normally vest ratably over a three-year period and have a 10-year term, reducing the risk that an
executive will take short-term action to inflate the price of the Companys stock for a brief period. Long-term incentive payouts are calculated at the conclusion of the two-year performance period, but not actually paid to the participant until an additional year has passed. In addition to serving as a retention vehicle, this also requires that the executive continue to have the value of the stock portion of
his or her award at risk, dependent on fluctuations in stock price, for an additional year. It also allows a year to pass in which any issues concerning the Companys operating or financial performance may come to light before payments are made. In addition, there are certain other factors related to our compensation programs for the named executive officers that we believe help reduce the likelihood that our compensation programs will encourage our executives to take undue risk:
Bonus Targets Based on Business Plan. As the bonus targets are based on the business plan, any significant deviation from the plan undertaken by management during the course of the year must be reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors. ROIC as Bonus Measurement. As a retail company, we believe that one of the potential risks we have is that management will attempt to achieve profit targets without taking into account the capital used, particularly working capital invested in inventory. We have therefore designed our long-term
incentive plan for senior management, including the named executive officers, to take into account ROIC as well as net income in determining whether a bonus will be paid. No Bonus Payments to Executives with Poor Performance Ratings. We have designed our plans so that executives who receive a Not Meeting Expectations or Unsatisfactory rating under the Companys annual performance appraisal process are not eligible to receive an annual bonus payment.
This helps prevent an individual executive from taking any action inconsistent with the business plan or otherwise exposing the Company to undue risk. Incentive Payments Proportional to Base Salary. We believe that our cash incentive payments are not outsized in relation to base salary. At target, the Chief Executive Officer has the opportunity to earn 125 percent of his base salary in annual bonus and 175 percent of his base salary in long-term
bonus. Comparable percentages for the Chief Operating Officer are 37
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
75 percent and 100 percent; for the other Executive Vice Presidents, 65 percent and 75 percent; and for Senior Vice Presidents (including Ms. Alviti), 50 percent and 75 percent. Bonus Caps. Annual cash bonus and the cash portion of the long-term incentive awards to executives are capped and do not include excessive leverage. Balance Among Components. There is a balance between annual, mid-term, and long-term compensation plans for executives, as well as a balance between the use of cash and equity. Please see Page 25 of the proxy statement for a discussion of compensation and risk in our compensation plans more generally, and the procedures we followed to evaluate this. Compensation Committee Procedure Each year, the Compensation Committee holds a meeting with management, the Companys compensation consultant, and the Committees independent compensation consultant to review the overall executive compensation environment, including recent developments in executive compensation, and
the Companys executive compensation program, including a historical view of the pay-for-performance correlation in the program and any changes to the program being recommended by management or either of the consultants. The Committee then holds a meeting in March, after the financial results for the prior year have been finalized and audited, to review and approve bonus and incentive compensation payments for the prior year and to review and approve compensation arrangementsbase salaries, stock awards, and
incentive plan targetsfor the upcoming year. The Committee meets privately with its independent consultant for the purpose of establishing the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, including establishing target awards under the Annual Bonus Plan and the long-term incentive compensation
program, and making stock awards to him. Except in the case of promotions or other unusual circumstances, the Compensation Committee considers stock awards only at its March meeting, which is normally held within a few weeks following the issuance of the Companys full-year earnings release for
the prior year. The Committee may hold other meetings during the year to review specific issues related to executive compensation, new developments in executive compensation, or other management resources-related issues. It also has responsibility, along with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,
for annually reviewing compensation paid to non-employee directors. In 2013, the Compensation Committee held a total of six meetings. The Compensation Committee has retained as its advisor a nationally recognized executive compensation consultantCompensation Advisory Partnersthat is independent and performs no other work for the Company. Compensation Advisory Partners is retained directly by the Compensation Committee,
reports to it directly, meets with the Committee privately, without management present, and regularly communicates privately with the Chair of the Committee. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Compensation Advisory Partners based on standards promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent it from serving as an independent consultant to the Committee. Each year, the Committees compensation consultant reviews a report on risk in relation to the Companys compensation policies and
practices, provides a pay-for-performance analysis of our executive compensation program, and reviews the Chief Executive Officers compensation. Management utilizes the services of ClearBridge Compensation Group, a nationally recognized compensation consultant, to provide advice on the executive
compensation program and plan design. Management is involved in various aspects of developing the executive compensation program. Our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, Vice PresidentHuman Resources, and staff in the Human Resources Department work with our Chief Executive Officer to develop 38
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION compensation recommendations for all corporate officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer or the Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer reviews these proposals with the Chair of the Compensation Committee, and may make changes to the
recommendations based upon his input, before the recommendations are forwarded to the Compensation Committee for review. Our Senior Vice President and General Counsel and Vice President and Associate General Counsel also attend meetings of the Compensation Committee and participate in
some of these discussions and preparations. The Compensation Committee has delegated authority to its Chair to approve stock option awards of up to 25,000 shares to any single employee other than a corporate officer. The Chair generally uses this authority to approve stock option grants made during the course of the year in connection with
promotions or new hires. In 2013, the Chair used this authority to approve a grant of options to one executive, who was not a named executive officer, to purchase a total of 1,100 shares. Those options are priced at fair market value on the date the Chair signs the approval. The Compensation Committee
has not delegated authority to management to make stock option, restricted stock, RSU, or other equity-based awards. Executive Employment Agreements As more fully described on Pages 51 to 54, we have employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. Other than the agreement with Mr. Hicks, which was separately negotiated when he joined the Company in 2009, the agreements with the named executive officers are in the same
form. Our employment agreements with the named executive officers provide for severance payments to the executive if we terminate the executives employment without cause or if we give the executive good reason to terminate employment. These payments to the named executive officers, calculated as if
termination of employment occurred at the end of our last fiscal year, are set out in the tables on Pages 56 to 67. The named executive officers receive an enhanced severance payment if the executives employment is terminated without cause or if the executive terminates employment for good reason within two years following a change-in-control. For an executive to receive the enhanced severance payment, two
events must occur: first, employment must be terminated for one of the specified reasons, and second, this termination must occur within two years following a change-in-control. We believe that these provisions, which we have had in place for a number of years, provide appropriate protection to our
executives, comparable to that available at other publicly traded companies, and, with regard to the enhanced severance following a change-in-control, protect us from losing key executives during a period when a change-in-control may be threatened or pending. None of the named executive officers is
entitled to a gross-up payment upon a change-in-control. All of the named executive officers have agreed in their employment contracts not to compete with the Company for two years following the termination of employment and not to hire Company employees during that same period. This restriction does not apply following a change-in-control. Accounting and Tax Considerations While we review both the accounting and tax effects of various components of compensation, these effects are not a significant factor in the Compensation Committees allocation of compensation among the different components. In general, it is our position that compensation paid to executive officers
should be fully deductible for U.S. tax purposes, and we have structured our bonus, long-term incentive, and stock option programs so that payments made under them are deductible. In certain instances, however, we believe that it is in the Companys best interests, and that of its 39
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION shareholders, to have the flexibility to pay compensation that is not deductible under the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code in order to provide a compensation package consistent with our program and objectives. The portion of base salary paid to Mr. Hicks that exceeds
$1,000,000, the value of time-based restricted stock awards made to him, and potentially a portion of the value of time-based restricted stock awards made to one or more of the other named executive officers, are not expected to be deductible. The Compensation and Management Resources Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on that review and discussion, has recommended to the Board of Directors
that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement. Alan D. Feldman, Chair 40
Nicholas DiPaolo
Steven Oakland
Cheryl Nido Turpin
Dona D. Young
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Name and Principal
Year
Salary
Bonus
Stock
Option
Non-Equity
Change
All Other
Total Ken C. Hicks
2013
1,100,000
3,496,281
5,669,402
3,290,375
291,428
218,739
14,066,225 Chairman, President
2012
1,100,000
1,925,017
3,040,800
4,233,625
504,007
247,120
11,050,569 and CEO
2011
1,100,000
500,000
2,867,015
2,878,750
5,954,052
520,474
238,856
14,059,147 Lauren B. Peters
2013
537,500
206,262
458,308
721,929
130,619
10,133
2,064,751 Executive VP and
2012
493,750
375,029
445,984
758,455
199,843
45,397
2,318,458 CFO
2011
439,061
827,696
549,216
1,393,837
174,519
300,996
3,685,325 Richard A. Johnson
2013
887,500
450,016
512,869
1,510,966
229,672
36,866
3,627,889 Executive VP and
2012
837,500
850,022
496,664
1,659,510
338,832
68,145
4,250,673 Chief Operating
2011
765,833
1,078,663
460,600
2,266,217
271,336
212,136
5,054,785 Officer Robert W. McHugh
2013
650,000
245,638
458,308
895,793
150,471
19,528
2,419,738 Executive VP
2012
631,250
476,261
445,984
994,934
231,482
58,598
2,838,509 Operations Support
2011
615,000
960,009
460,600
2,023,125
220,847
202,093
4,481,674 Paulette Alviti
2013
300,000
1,511,341
231,939
262,041
45,550
149,389
2,500,260 Senior VP and Chief Human Resources Officer Notes to Summary Compensation Table
(1)
Lauren B. Peters has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 1, 2011. Prior to this, she served as Senior Vice PresidentStrategic Planning. Richard A. Johnson has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since May 16, 2012. He served as Executive Vice President and Group PresidentRetail Stores from July 1, 2011 to May 16, 2012. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Foot Locker U.S., Lady Foot
Locker, Kids Foot Locker, and Footaction from January 8, 2010 to June 30, 2011. Robert W. McHugh has served as Executive Vice PresidentOperations Support since July 1, 2011. He previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from May 1, 2009 to June 30, 2011. Paulette Alviti has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since the commencement of her employment with the Company on June 3, 2013. (2) This column reflects the sign-on bonus Mr. Hicks received in connection with the commencement of his employment in August 2009, a portion of which was paid on his employment commencement date in 2009, with the balance paid to him over a two-year period on the first and second
anniversaries of his employment date. (3) The amounts in these columns reflect the stock and option awards granted in the designated years. The amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards granted in each respective year calculated in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules (ASC Topic 718). A
discussion of the assumptions used in computing the award values may be found in Note 22 to our financial statements in our Form 10-K for 2013. As provided under the SECs rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions and include
for restricted stock awards expected dividend payments at the same rate as paid on our shares of Common Stock. Please see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on Page 44 for additional information on awards granted in 2013. The amounts shown in 41
Position(1)
($)
($)(2)
Awards
($)(3)(4)
Awards
($)(3)
Incentive Plan
Compensation($)(5)
in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings($)(6)
Compensation($)(7)
($)
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
the table do not necessarily reflect the actual value that may be recognized by the named executives. (4) The amounts in column (e) include the grant date fair value of performance-based restricted stock units (RSUs) granted for the long-term performance measurement periods of 2013-2014, 2012-2013, and 2011-2012, valued at grant date based upon the probable outcome of meeting the performance
conditions. The amounts shown reflect the achievement of target level performance for the 2013-2014 performance period and maximum performance for the 2012-2013 and 2011-2012 performance periods, are consistent with the estimate of the aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over
the service period determined at the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718, and exclude the effect of estimated forfeitures. For 2013 and 2011, column (e) also includes restricted stock awards where applicable. Please see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on Page 44 for additional information on
the awards granted in 2013. (5) For 2013, this column reflects the sum of the cash incentive payouts made in 2014 under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (Annual Bonus Plan) for 2013 and the cash portion of the earned payout under the Long-Term Incentive program (LTI) for the 2012-2013 performance measurement
period that is payable in 2015 if the executive continues to be employed by us on the payment date, as shown in Table I below. For 2012, this column reflects the sum of the cash incentive payouts made in 2013 under the Annual Bonus Plan for 2012 and the cash portion of the earned LTI payout for
the 2011-2012 performance measurement period that was paid in 2014, as shown in Table II below. For 2011, this column reflects the sum of the cash incentive payments made in 2012 under the Annual Bonus Plan for 2011 and the LTI payment for the 2009-2011 performance measurement period,
and the cash portion of the earned LTI incentive for the 2010-2011 performance measurement period paid in 2013, as shown in Table III below. I Cash Incentive Payouts for 2013
Payout in 2014
Payout in 2015
Name
Annual Bonus Plan
LTI
Total K. Hicks
$
1,365,375
$
1,925,000
$
3,290,375 L. Peters
346,929
375,000
721,929 R. Johnson
660,966
850,000
1,510,966 R. McHugh
419,543
476,250
895,793 P. Alviti
150,000
112,041
262,041 II Cash Incentive Payouts for 2012
Payout in 2013
Payout in 2014
Name
Annual Bonus Plan
LTI
Total K. Hicks
$
2,308,625
$
1,925,000
$
4,233,625 L. Peters
414,503
343,952
758,455 R. Johnson
1,054,622
604,888
1,659,510 R. McHugh
529,934
465,000
994,934 P. Alviti
42
Cash Payment for 2013
2012-2013 Performance Period
(Cash Payout Earned
Payable in 2015)
As Shown in Summary
Compensation Table
Cash Payment for 2012
2011-2012 Performance Period
(Cash Payout Earned
Payable in 2014)
As Shown in Summary
Compensation Table
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION III Cash Incentive Payouts for 2011
Payouts in 2012
Payout in 2013
Name
Annual Bonus Plan
LTI
Total Cash
LTI
Total as K. Hicks
$
2,406,250
$
1,622,802
$
4,029,052
$
1,925,000
$
5,954,052 L. Peters
384,179
701,726
1,085,905
307,932
1,393,837 R. Johnson
670,104
1,049,272
1,719,376
546,841
2,266,217 R. McHugh
538,125
1,035,000
1,573,125
450,000
2,023,125 P. Alviti
(6)
Amounts shown in column (h) represent the annual change in pension value during each of our last three fiscal years for each of the executives. Please see Page 70 for more information on 2013 pension benefits. (7) This column includes perquisites and other compensation, and the amounts attributable to the executives for 2013 are shown in the tables below. We valued these perquisites at the incremental cost to the Company of providing the personal benefits to the executives, which represents the actual cost
attributable to providing these personal benefits. Please note:
The amounts shown for financial planning and medical expense reimbursement reflect amounts reimbursed in 2013, which may also include reimbursement of amounts submitted in 2013 for expenses incurred in 2012. The amounts shown in the table under the 401(k) Match column represent the dollar value of the Companys matching contribution under the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan made to the named executives account in shares of Common Stock. The shares of stock for the 2013 matching contribution were
valued at $41.44 per share. The amounts shown under the column Accrual for Post-Retirement Medical reflect the amounts accrued in 2013 for the actuarial present value of the future cost of providing this benefit to these individuals. Mr. Hicks and Ms. Alviti are the only named executives who are not fully eligible for this
benefit and, therefore, their benefit accruals reflect the fact that they are earning additional service credit towards benefit eligibility, resulting in a higher accrual amount than the other named executives who are already fully eligible for the benefit. The amounts shown under the columns One-Time Relocation Repayment and Tax Gross-Up for Ms. Alviti reflect the reimbursement of relocation payments Ms. Alviti was required to make to her former employer upon commencing employment with the Company and the related one-time tax gross-
up payment.
Name
Auto
Car
Universal
Medical
Executive
Supp. LTD
Accrual
Financial
401(k)
Total K. Hicks
28,308
18,607
6,303
2,242
884
12,515
138,730
8,600
2,550
218,739 L. Peters
1,520
2,562
3,501
2,550
10,133 R. Johnson
8,958
4,599
5,200
884
6,075
8,600
2,550
36,866 R. McHugh
11,978
5,000
2,550
19,528 43
Cash Payment for
2011
2009-2011
Performance
Period
(Cash Payout)
Bonus Payments
Received in 2012
2010-2011
Performance
Period
(Cash Payout
Earned
Payable in 2013)
Shown in
Summary
Compensation
Table
Allowances
Service
Reimb.
Life
Insurance
Premium
Expense
Reimbursement
Physical
Insurance
Premiums
for Post-
Retirement
Medical
Planning
Match
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Name
Auto
Financial
Universal
Medical
Executive
Supp. LTD
Accrual
One-Time
Tax
Total P. Alviti
14,934
6,802
3,384
944
684
1,985
81,681
22,500
16,475
149,389 The following Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table shows the awards made to the named executive officers in 2013 under the Annual Bonus Plan and the Long-Term Bonus Plan, as well as the restricted stock unit and stock option awards under the Companys Stock Incentive Plan.
(a)
(b)
Estimated Future Payouts
Estimated Future Payouts
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Name
Grant
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Threshold
Target
Maximum
All
All
Exercise
Grant K. Hicks
03/28/13(1
)
343,750
1,375,000
2,406,250
03/28/13(2
)
240,625
962,500
1,925,000
03/28/13(2
)
7,028
28,111
56,221
962,521
03/28/13(3
)
280,000
34.24
3,055,388
03/29/13(3
)
232,000
34.24
2,614,014
03/29/13(4
)
74,000
2,533,760 L. Peters
03/28/13(1
)
89,375
357,500
625,625
03/28/13(2
)
51,563
206,250
412,500
03/28/13(2
)
1,506
6,024
12,048
206,262
03/28/13(3
)
42,000
34.24
458,308 R. Johnson
03/28/13(1
)
168,750
675,000
1,181,250
03/28/13(2
)
112,500
450,000
900,000
03/28/13(2
)
3,286
13,143
26,286
450,016
03/28/13(3
)
47,000
34.24
512,869 R. McHugh
03/28/13(1
)
106,438
425,750
745,063
03/28/13(2
)
61,407
245,625
491,250
03/28/13(2
)
1,794
7,174
14,348
245,638
03/28/13(3
)
42,000
34.24
458,308 P. Alviti
06/03/13(1
)
37,500
150,000
262,500
06/03/13(2
)
35,235
140,940
281,880
06/03/13(2
)
1,029
4,113
8,226
140,953
06/03/13(4
)
30,000
1,028,100
06/03/13(4
)
6,718
230,226
06/03/13(3
)
21,000
34.27
231,939 Notes to Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
(1)
Annual Incentive Awards Amounts shown reflect the payment levels at threshold, target, and maximum performance for the 2013 fiscal year under the Annual Bonus Plan and reflect the potential amounts that would be paid at the end of the period if the applicable performance goals were achieved. The estimated bonus
payouts are based on a percentage of the executives base salary, as shown in the table below. 44
Allowances
Planning
Life
Insurance
Premium
Expense
Reimbursement
Physical
Insurance
Premiums
for Post-
Retirement
Medical
Relocation
Payment
Gross
Up
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
Date
($)
($)
($)
(#)
(#)
(#)
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Under-
lying
Options
(#)
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards(5)
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Name
Threshold
Target
Maximum K. Hicks
31.25%
125%
218.75% L. Peters
16.25%
65%
113.75% R. Johnson
18.75%
75%
131.25% R. McHugh
16.25%
65%
113.75% P. Alviti
12.5%
50%
87.5% The annual bonus payments actually made to the named executives for 2013 are shown in Note 5 to the Summary Compensation Table on Page 42.
(2)
Long-Term Incentive Awards Provided the performance goals for the 2013-2014 long-term performance measurement period are achieved, the payout structure of the executives awards is as follows: (a) 50 percent of the award would be payable in cash under the Long-Term Bonus Plan, (b) 50 percent of the award would be
payable in restricted stock units under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, and (c) both the cash portion and the stock portion of the payout would be subject to a time-based, one-year holding period following the end of the performance measurement period before payout to the executives. The amounts
shown in the table reflect the estimated payment levels in cash and number of restricted stock units at threshold, target, and maximum performance for the 2013-2014 performance measurement period. Columns (c), (d), and (e) show the estimated cash payments and columns (f), (g), and (h) show
the number of restricted stock units that would be paid out at threshold, target and maximum performance if the applicable performance goals are achieved. The amounts shown for Ms. Alviti are pro rated, as she commenced employment on June 3, 2013. The threshold, target and maximum number of restricted stock units for each executive was calculated on the date of grant on the basis of that days closing stock price of a share of the Companys Common Stock. The closing price on the grant date of March 28, 2013 for each of the named
executives other than Ms. Alviti was $34.24. The closing price on the grant date of June 3, 2013 for Ms. Alviti was $34.27. Similarly, the grant date fair values of the restricted stock unit awards are based on the closing stock price on these grant dates. The actual number of restricted stock units paid
out will be based on the Companys performance compared to targets. The value of the restricted stock units received by an executive will depend upon the Companys stock price on the payment date in 2016. No dividends are paid or accrued for the restricted stock units. The aggregate payout in cash and stock at threshold, target and maximum performance for each of the named executives is based on a percentage of the executives base salary in the first year of the performance period. The percent of base salary for each executive at threshold, target and maximum
performance is shown in the table below:
Name
Threshold
Target
Maximum K. Hicks
43.75%
175%
350% L. Peters
18.75%
75%
150% R. Johnson
25.00%
100%
200% R. McHugh
18.75%
75%
150% P. Alviti
18.75%
75%
150% No amounts would be paid to the executives under the long-term incentive awards unless the performance goals for the performance measurement period are achieved. 45
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(3)
Stock Option Grants The amounts in column (j) reflect the number of stock options granted in 2013 under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. The exercise price reflected in column (k) is equal to the closing price of a share of the Companys Common Stock on the grant date. In general, no portion of any stock option may be
exercised until the first anniversary of its date of grant. Vested options may be exercised for ten years following the date of grant, unless the option is cancelled or exercised sooner than this. If the executive retires, becomes disabled, or dies while employed by the Company or one of its subsidiaries,
all unexercised options that are then exercisable, plus those options that would have become exercisable on the next anniversary of the grant date, will remain (or become) exercisable as of that date. Moreover, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, all outstanding options will become
immediately exercisable as of that date. In general, options may remain exercisable for up to three years following a participants retirement or termination due to disability, and for up to one year for any other termination of employment for reasons other than cause. The vesting schedule for options granted to the executives in 2013 is shown below.
Name
Grant Date
# of Shares
Vest Date:
Vest Date:
Vest Date: K. Hicks
3/28/13
280,000
3/28/14: 93,333
3/28/15: 93,333
3/28/16: 93,334 K. Hicks
3/29/13
232,000
3/29/15: 116,000
3/29/16: 116,000 L. Peters
3/28/13
42,000
3/28/14: 14,000
3/28/15: 14,000
3/28/16: 14,000 R. Johnson
3/28/13
47,000
3/28/14: 15,666
3/28/15: 15,667
3/28/16: 15,667 R. McHugh
3/28/13
42,000
3/28/14: 14,000
3/28/15: 14,000
3/28/16: 14,000 P. Alviti
6/03/13
21,000
6/03/14: 7,000
6/03/15: 7,000
6/03/16: 7,000
(4)
Restricted Stock and RSUs The amounts shown in the table under column (i) represent the number of shares of restricted stock or time-vested restricted stock units (RSUs) granted to Mr. Hicks and Ms. Alviti under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. Mr. Hicks restricted stock award for 74,000 shares will vest 50 percent in March
2015 and 50 percent in March 2016, provided that he remains employed by the Company through the vesting dates. Ms. Alvitis restricted stock award for 30,000 shares will vest in three installments, in June 2014, June 2015, and June 2016, provided that she remains employed by the Company
through the vesting dates. Ms. Alvitis award of 6,718 RSUs vested in March 2014. With regard to the restricted stock awards, Mr. Hicks and Ms. Alviti have the right to receive all regular cash dividends payable after the date of grant to all record holders of our Common Stock. The grant date fair value
of the restricted stock awards shown in column (l) includes expected dividend payments on the shares. (5) Grant Date Fair Value The amounts shown in column (l) reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock, restricted stock unit, and stock option awards granted in 2013, calculated in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718). A discussion of the assumptions used in
computing the award values may be found in Note 22 to our financial statements in our Form 10-K for 2013. As provided under the SECs rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions and include, where applicable, expected dividend
payments at the same rate as paid on our shares of Common Stock. For option awards, the value is calculated by multiplying the Black-Scholes value by the number of options granted. For restricted stock and time-vested RSUs, the fair value is calculated by multiplying the closing price of our Common
Stock on The New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE) on the award date by the number of shares or RSUs granted. For the performance-based restricted stock units awarded under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan in connection with the 2013-2014 long-term performance measurement period, the fair
value is 46
# of Shares
# of Shares
# of Shares
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
calculated based upon the probable outcome of meeting the performance conditions at the target performance level and multiplying the number of units that would be received at that level by the closing price of a share of our Common Stock on the grant date. This is consistent with the estimate of
the aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined at the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718. All of these values are shown in the table below.
Name
Black-Scholes
Black-Scholes
Black-Scholes
Restricted
Restricted
Performance-
Performance- K. Hicks
$
10.9121
$
11.2673
$
34.24
$
34.24
L. Peters
$
10.9121
$
34.24
R. Johnson
$
10.9121
$
34.24
R. McHugh
$
10.9121
$
34.24
P. Alviti
$
11.0447
$
34.27
$
34.27 Salary. The annual base salaries and cash bonuses earned by our named executives for 2013 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. Including the cash long-term incentive earned for the 2012-2013 performance period that is payable in 2015, these amounts represented the following
percentages of the named executives total compensation for 2013: Mr. Hicks (31.2%), Ms. Peters (61.0%), Mr. Johnson (66.1%), Mr. McHugh (63.9%), and Ms. Alviti (22.5%). Information on the named executives employment agreements appears beginning on Page 51. 47
Value for
Stock
Options
Granted on
March 28,
2013
Value for
Stock
Option
Granted on
March 29,
2013
Value for
Stock
Option
Granted on
June 3,
2013
Stock
Award
Granted on
March 29,
2013
Stock/RSU
Awards
Granted on
June 3,
2013
Based RSU
Awards
Granted on
March 28,
2013
Based RSU
Award
Granted on
June 3,
2013
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table, Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End shows the number of outstanding stock options, both vested and unvested, and the number of unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units held by the named executives at the end of the 2013 fiscal year. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End (a)
Option Awards
Stock Awards
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Name
Number of
Number of
Equity
Option Exercise
Option
Number
Market
Equity Incentive
Equity Incentive K. Hicks
600,000
0
10.10
08/25/2019
300,000
0
15.10
03/23/2020
333,333
166,667
18.84
03/23/2021
100,0000
200,000
30.92
03/21/2022
0
280,000
34.24
03/28/2023
0
232,000
34.24
03/29/2023
50,000
1,930,000
74,000
2,856,400
102,177
3,944,032
62,258
2,403,159
7,028
271,281 L. Peters
25,000
0
28.155
03/23/2015
25,000
0
23.92
03/22/2016
20,000
0
23.42
03/28/2017
25,000
0
11.66
03/26/2018
25,000
0
9.93
03/25/2019
40,000
0
15.10
03/23/2020
26,666
13,334
18.84
03/23/2021
26,666
13,334
24.75
05/26/2021
14,666
29,334
30.92
03/21/2022
0
42,000
34.24
03/28/2023
20,000
772,000
17,659
681,637
12,129
468,179
1,506
58,132 R. Johnson
20,000
0
23.42
03/28/2017
20,000
0
18.80
07/30/2017
10,000
0
11.66
03/26/2018
25,000
0
9.93
03/25/2019
80,000
0
15.10
03/23/2020
53,333
26,667
18.84
03/23/2021
16,333
32,667
30.92
03/21/2022
0
47,000
34.24
03/28/2023
20,000
772,000
31,444
1,213,738
27,491
1,061,153
3,286
126,840 R. McHugh
20,000
0
28.155
03/23/2015
30,000
0
21.48
11/21/2015
20,000
0
23.42
03/28/2017
25,000
0
11.66
03/26/2018
80,000
0
15.10
03/23/2020
53,333
26,667
18.84
03/23/2021
14,666
29,334
30.92
03/21/2022
0
42,000
34.24
03/28/2023
20,000
772,000
24,682
952,725
15,403
594,556
1,794
69,248 P. Alviti
0
21,000
34.27
06/03/2023
36,718
1,417,315
3,270
126,222
1,029
39,719 48
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable(1)
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable(1)
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Price
($)
Expiration
Date
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(2)
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(3)
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(2)
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(3)
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Notes to Table on Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
(1)
The Vesting Schedules for the options shown in columns (b) and (c) are as follows:
Name
Total Number of
Date of Grant
Vesting Date for 1/3
Vesting Date for 1/3
Vesting Date for 1/3 K. Hicks
300,000
08/25/2009
08/25/2010
08/25/2011
08/25/2012
300,000
08/25/2009
02/25/2010
*
08/25/2010
*
300,000
03/23/2010
03/23/2011
03/23/2012
03/23/2013
500,000
03/23/2011
03/23/2012
03/23/2013
03/23/2014
300,000
03/21/2012
03/21/2013
03/21/2014
03/21/2015
280,000
03/28/2013
03/28/2014
03/28/2015
03/28/2016
232,000
03/29/2013
03/29/2015
**
03/29/2016
**
2,212,000 L. Peters
25,000
03/23/2005
03/23/2006
03/23/2007
03/23/2009
25,000
03/22/2006
03/22/2007
03/22/2008
03/22/2009
20,000
03/28/2007
03/28/2008
03/28/2009
03/28/2010
25,000
03/26/2008
03/26/2009
03/26/2010
03/26/2011
25,000
03/25/2009
03/25/2010
03/25/2011
03/25/2012
40,000
03/23/2010
03/23/2011
03/23/2012
03/23/2013
40,000
03/23/2011
03/23/2012
03/23/2013
03/23/2014
40,000
05/26/2011
05/26/2012
05/26/2013
05/26/2014
44,000
03/21/2012
03/21/2013
03/21/2014
03/21/2015
42,000
03/28/2013
03/28/2014
03/28/2015
03/28/2016
326,000 R. Johnson
20,000
03/28/2007
03/28/2008
03/28/2009
03/28/2010
20,000
07/30/2007
07/30/2008
07/30/2009
07/30/2010
10,000
03/26/2008
03/26/2009
03/26/2010
03/26/2011
25,000
03/25/2009
03/25/2010
03/25/2011
03/25/2012
80,000
03/23/2010
03/23/2011
03/23/2012
03/23/2013
80,000
03/23/2011
03/23/2012
03/23/2013
03/23/2014
49,000
03/21/2012
03/21/2013
03/21/2014
03/21/2015
47,000
03/28/2013
03/28/2014
03/28/2015
03/28/2016
331,000 R. McHugh
20,000
03/23/2005
03/23/2006
03/23/2007
03/23/2008
30,000
11/21/2005
11/21/2006
11/21/2007
11/21/2008
20,000
03/28/2007
03/28/2008
03/28/2009
03/28/2010
25,000
03/26/2008
03/26/2009
03/26/2010
03/26/2011
80,000
03/23/2010
03/23/2011
03/23/2012
03/23/2013
80,000
03/23/2011
03/23/2012
03/23/2013
03/23/2014
44,000
03/21/2012
03/21/2013
03/21/2014
03/21/2015
42,000
03/28/2013
03/28/2014
03/28/2015
03/28/2016
341,000 P. Alviti
21,000
06/03/2013
06/03/2014
06/03/2015
06/03/2016
21,000
*
50 percent of grant vested six months following grant date and 50 percent vested one year following grant date. ** 50 percent of grant vests two years following grant date and 50 percent will vest three years following grant date.
(2)
The vesting dates for the restricted stock and restricted stock unit (RSU) awards shown in column (g) and (i) are set forth in the following table. The RSU awards shown in column (g) granted in 2011 were earned following the end of the 2012 fiscal year when the Compensation and Management
Resources Committee certified the achievement of the performance goals at the maximum level for the 2011-2012 long-term performance measurement period and vested in March 2014; the RSU awards shown in column (i) granted in 2012 were earned following the end of the 2013 fiscal year when
the Compensation and Management Resources Committee certified the achievement of the performance goals at the maximum level for the 2012-2013 long-term performance measurement period and will vest in 2015, and the RSU awards shown in column (i) granted in 2013 will be earned only if
the threshold performance goals for the 2013-2014 performance measurement period are achieved and, if earned, will vest in 2016. 49
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
of Total Grant
of Total Grant
of Total Grant
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Name
Date of Grant
Type of Award
Number of
Vesting Date K. Hicks
03/23/2011
Restricted Stock
50,000
03/23/2014
03/23/2011
RSU
102,177
03/23/2014
03/21/2012
RSU
62,258
03/21/2015
03/28/2013
RSU
7,028
03/28/2016
03/29/2013
Restricted Stock
37,000
03/29/2015
03/29/2013
Restricted Stock
37,000
03/29/2016 L. Peters
05/26/2011
Restricted Stock
20,000
06/30/2014
03/23/2011
RSU
15,753
03/23/2014
05/26/2011
RSU
1,906
03/23/2014
03/21/2012
RSU
12,129
03/21/2015
03/28/2013
RSU
1,506
03/28/2016 R. Johnson
05/26/2011
Restricted Stock
20,000
06/30/2014
03/23/2011
RSU
29,658
03/23/2014
05/26/2011
RSU
1,322
03/23/2014
05/16/2012
RSU
464
03/23/2014
03/21/2012
RSU
27,491
03/21/2015
03/28/2013
RSU
3,286
03/28/2016 R. McHugh
05/26/2011
Restricted Stock
20,000
06/30/2014
03/23/2011
RSU
24,682
03/23/2014
03/21/2012
RSU
15,403
03/21/2015
03/28/2013
RSU
1,794
03/28/2016 P. Alviti
Shares/RSUs