sv4za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 3, 2010
Registration
No. 333-166964
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 2
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
APACHE CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
1311
|
|
41-0747868
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(Primary Standard
Industrial
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
Incorporation or
Organization)
|
|
Classification Code
Number)
|
|
Identification
Number)
|
One Post Oak Central
2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100
Houston, Texas
77056-4400
(713) 296-6000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number,
including area code, of
registrants principal executive offices)
P. Anthony Lannie
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Apache Corporation
One Post Oak Central
2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77056-4400
(713) 296-6000
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent
for service)
Copies To:
|
|
|
|
|
John B. Clutterbuck
Tim C. Langenkamp
Andrews Kurth LLP
600 Travis, Suite 4200
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 220-4200
|
|
Teresa G. Bushman
Senior Vice President, General Counsel,
and Secretary
Mariner Energy, Inc.
One BriarLake Plaza
2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South,
Suite 2000
Houston, Texas 77042
(713) 954-5505
|
|
Kelly B. Rose
M. Breen Haire
Baker Botts L.L.P.
One Shell Plaza
910 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002-4995
(713) 229-1234
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the
securities to the public: As soon as practicable
after the effectiveness of this registration statement and the
satisfaction or waiver of all other conditions to the closing of
the merger described herein.
If the securities being registered on this form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check
the following
box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment that
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this proxy statement/prospectus is not complete
and may be changed. A registration statement relating to these
securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to
buy be accepted prior to the time the registration statement
becomes effective. This proxy statement/prospectus shall not
constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to
buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any
jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be
unlawful.
|
PRELIMINARY SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION, DATED AUGUST 3, 2010
PROPOSED
MERGER YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
Dear Stockholders of Mariner Energy, Inc.:
On April 14, 2010, Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Apache Corporation entered into a merger
agreement that provides for Mariner to merge with and into a
wholly owned subsidiary of Apache. The Mariner board of
directors has determined that the merger and the merger
agreement are advisable and in the best interests of Mariner and
its stockholders and has approved the merger agreement and the
merger.
Under the merger agreement,
Mariner stockholders may elect to receive consideration
consisting of cash, shares of Apache common stock or a
combination of both in exchange for their shares of Mariner
common stock, subject to a proration feature. Mariner
stockholders electing to receive a mix of cash and stock
consideration and
non-electing
stockholders will receive $7.80 in cash and 0.17043 shares
of Apache common stock in exchange for each share of Mariner
common stock. Subject to proration, Mariner stockholders
electing to receive all cash will receive $26.00 in cash per
Mariner share and Mariner stockholders electing to receive only
Apache common stock will receive 0.24347 shares of Apache
common stock in exchange for each share of Mariner common stock.
The total amount of cash and
shares of Apache common stock that will be paid and issued,
respectively, pursuant to the merger agreement is fixed, and an
election to receive stock consideration or cash consideration is
subject to a proration feature. As a result, if Mariner
stockholders elect, in the aggregate, to receive cash in an
amount greater than the aggregate cash consideration payable
under the merger agreement, then those holders electing to
receive all cash consideration will be prorated down (in
accordance with their respective shares for which the cash
consideration was elected) and will receive Apache stock as a
portion of the overall consideration they receive for their
shares. On the other hand, if Mariner stockholders elect, in the
aggregate, to receive stock in an amount greater than the
aggregate number of shares issuable under the merger agreement,
then those holders electing to receive all stock consideration
will be prorated down (in accordance with their respective
shares for which the stock consideration was elected) and will
receive cash as a portion of the overall consideration they
receive for their shares.
Immediately following completion
of the merger, it is expected that Mariner stockholders will own
approximately 5% of the outstanding shares of Apache common
stock, based on the number of shares of Mariner and Apache
common stock outstanding as of July 28, 2010.
Apaches common stock is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the Chicago Stock
Exchange and the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol
APA.
Mariners common stock is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
ME.
Mariner is holding a special
meeting of stockholders on [], 2010 to consider and vote
to approve and adopt the merger agreement, as it may be amended
from time to time. Your vote is very important. The merger
cannot be completed unless the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of Mariner common stock vote for the approval
and adoption of the merger agreement at the special meeting.
Please note that a failure to vote your shares is the
equivalent of a vote AGAINST the approval and
adoption of the merger agreement.
The Mariner board of directors
unanimously recommends that Mariner stockholders vote
FOR the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement.
Your vote is important. Whether or
not you expect to attend the Mariner special meeting in person,
we urge you to submit your proxy as promptly as possible through
one of the delivery methods described in the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus.
In addition, we urge you to read
carefully the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus (and the
documents incorporated by reference into the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus), which includes important information
about the merger agreement, the proposed merger, Mariner, Apache
and the special meeting. The obligations of Apache and Mariner
to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver
of several conditions set forth in the merger agreement.
Please pay particular attention to the section titled
Risk Factors in the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus.
On behalf of the Mariner board of
directors, thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely,
Scott D. Josey
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President
Neither the Securities and
Exchange Commission, which is referred to as the SEC, nor any
state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
merger or the securities to be issued under this proxy
statement/prospectus or has passed upon the adequacy or accuracy
of the disclosure in this proxy statement/prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This proxy statement/prospectus is
dated [], 2010, and is first being mailed to Mariner
stockholders on or about [], 2010.
One
BriarLake Plaza
2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South, Suite 2000
Houston, Texas 77042
(713) 954-5500
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of Mariner Energy, Inc.:
Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of stockholders of
Mariner Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which is referred
to as Mariner, will be held on [], 2010 at [], local
time, at Mariners principal executive offices located at
One BriarLake Plaza, 2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South,
Suite 2000, Houston, Texas 77042, for the following
purposes:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
to consider and vote on the proposal to approve and adopt the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 14, 2010, as
amended by Amendment No. 1 dated August 2, 2010 (as
amended, referred to as the merger agreement), by and among
Apache Corporation, which is referred to as Apache, ZMZ
Acquisitions LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Apache, and Mariner, as it may be
amended from time to time (a copy of the merger agreement is
attached as Annex A to the proxy statement/prospectus
accompanying this notice);
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
to consider and vote on any proposal to adjourn the special
meeting to a later date or dates if necessary to solicit
additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to approve
and adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special
meeting; and
|
|
|
3.
|
to transact any other business that may properly come before the
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting.
|
These items of business, including the merger agreement and the
proposed merger, are described in detail in the accompanying
proxy statement/prospectus. The Mariner board of directors
has determined that the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, are
advisable and in the best interests of Mariner and its
stockholders and unanimously recommends that Mariner
stockholders vote FOR the proposal to approve and
adopt the merger agreement and FOR any proposal to
adjourn the special meeting if necessary to solicit additional
proxies in favor of approval and adoption. In considering
the recommendation of Mariners board of directors,
stockholders of Mariner should be aware that members of
Mariners board of directors and its executive officers
have agreements and arrangements that provide them with
interests in the merger that may be different from, or in
addition to, those of Mariner stockholders. See The
Merger Interests of the Mariner Directors and
Executive Officers in the Merger.
Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on
[], 2010 are entitled to notice of the Mariner special
meeting and to vote at the Mariner special meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement thereof. A list of stockholders
entitled to vote at the special meeting will be available in our
principal executive offices located at One BriarLake Plaza,
2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South, Suite 2000,
Houston, Texas 77042, during regular business hours for a period
of no less than ten days before the special meeting and at the
place of the special meeting during the meeting.
Approval and adoption of the merger agreement by the Mariner
stockholders is a condition to the merger and requires the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of
Mariner common stock outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.
Therefore, your vote is very important. Your failure to vote
your shares will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement.
By Order of the Board of Directors of
Mariner Energy, Inc.
Teresa G. Bushman,
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
Houston, Texas
[], 2010
YOUR VOTE
IS IMPORTANT!
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MARINER SPECIAL MEETING
IN PERSON, WE URGE YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS
POSSIBLE (1) THROUGH THE INTERNET, (2) BY TELEPHONE OR
(3) BY MARKING, SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD
AND RETURNING IT IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED. You may
revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before the
Mariner special meeting. If your shares are held in the name of
a bank, broker or other fiduciary, please follow the
instructions on the voting instruction card furnished to you by
such record holder. Brokers cannot vote on the proposal to
approve and adopt the merger agreement without your instructions.
We urge you to read the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus,
including all documents incorporated by reference into the
accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, and its annexes
carefully and in their entirety. If you have any questions
concerning the merger, the special meeting or the accompanying
proxy statement/prospectus, would like additional copies of the
accompanying proxy statement/prospectus or need help voting your
shares of Mariner common stock, please contact Mariners
information agent/proxy solicitor:
Morrow &
Co., LLC
470 West Avenue
Stamford, CT 06902
Stockholders, call toll-free:
(800) 278-2141
Banks and brokers, call collect:
(203) 658-9400
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference
important business and financial information about Apache and
Mariner from other documents filed with the SEC that are not
included or delivered with this proxy statement/prospectus. See
Where You Can Find More Information; Incorporation by
Reference.
Documents incorporated by reference are available to you without
charge upon written or oral request. You can obtain any of these
documents by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the
appropriate company at the following addresses and telephone
numbers.
|
|
|
Apache Corporation
Attention: Corporate Secretary
One Post Oak Central
2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100
Houston, Texas
77056-4400
(713) 296-6157
www.apachecorp.com
|
|
Mariner Energy, Inc.
Attention: Corporate Secretary
One BriarLake Plaza
2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South, Suite 2000
Houston, Texas 77042
(713) 954-5505
www.mariner-energy.com
|
To receive timely delivery of the requested documents in
advance of the special meeting, you should make your request no
later than [], 2010.
ABOUT
THIS DOCUMENT
This document, which forms part of a registration statement on
Form S-4
filed with the SEC by Apache (File
No. 333-166964),
constitutes a prospectus of Apache under Section 5 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the
Securities Act, with respect to the shares of Apache common
stock to be issued pursuant to the merger agreement. This
document also constitutes a notice of meeting and a proxy
statement under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the Exchange Act,
with respect to the special meeting of Mariner stockholders, at
which Mariner stockholders will be asked to consider and vote
on, among other matters, a proposal to approve and adopt the
merger agreement.
You should rely only on the information contained in or
incorporated by reference into this document. No one has been
authorized to provide you with information that is different
from that contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this
document. This document is dated [], 2010. The information
contained in this document is accurate only as of that date or
in the case of information in a document incorporated by
reference, as of the date of such document, unless the
information specifically indicates that another date applies.
Neither our mailing of this document to Mariner stockholders nor
the issuance by Apache of shares of its common stock pursuant to
the merger agreement will create any implication to the contrary.
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Annexes
iii
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
The following are some questions that Mariner stockholders
may have regarding the merger and the special meeting, and brief
answers to those questions. You are encouraged to read carefully
this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including the Annexes,
and the other documents to which this proxy statement/prospectus
refers or incorporates by reference because the information in
this section does not provide all the information that might be
important to you. Unless stated otherwise, all references in
this proxy statement/prospectus to Apache are to Apache
Corporation, a Delaware corporation; all references to Mariner
are to Mariner Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation; all
references to Merger Sub or the surviving entity are to ZMZ
Acquisitions LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Apache; and all references to the
merger agreement are to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
April 14, 2010, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated
August 2, 2010, by and among Apache, Merger Sub and
Mariner, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this
proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
Q:
|
Why am I
receiving this document?
|
|
|
A: |
Apache and Mariner have agreed to a merger, pursuant to which
Mariner will merge with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of
Apache and will cease to be a publicly held corporation. In
order to complete the merger, Mariner stockholders must vote to
approve and adopt the merger agreement, and Mariner is holding a
special meeting of stockholders to obtain such stockholder
approval. In the merger, Mariner stockholders may elect to
receive consideration consisting of cash, shares of Apache
common stock, or a combination of both in exchange for their
shares of Mariner common stock, subject to a proration feature.
|
This document is being delivered to you as both a proxy
statement of Mariner and a prospectus of Apache in connection
with the merger. It is the proxy statement by which the Mariner
board of directors is soliciting proxies from you to vote on the
approval and adoption of the merger agreement, as it may be
amended from time to time, at the special meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. It is also
the prospectus by which Apache may issue Apache common stock to
you in the merger.
|
|
Q:
|
What will
happen in the merger?
|
|
|
A: |
In the merger, Mariner will merge with and into Merger Sub, with
Merger Sub surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of
Apache. As a result of the merger, Mariner will cease to exist,
Merger Sub will continue to be owned by Apache and Apache will
continue as a public company.
|
|
|
Q:
|
What will
I receive in the merger?
|
|
|
A: |
If the merger is completed, each of your shares of Mariner
common stock will be converted into the right to receive, at
your election and subject to proration, one of the following:
(i) 0.24347 shares of Apache common stock, par value
$0.625 per share, which is sometimes referred to as the stock
consideration, (ii) $26.00 in cash, which is sometimes
referred to as the cash consideration or (iii) a
combination of $7.80 in cash and 0.17043 shares of Apache
common stock, which is sometimes referred to as the mixed
consideration, as described under The Merger
Agreement Conversion of Securities.
|
The total amount of cash and shares of Apache common stock that
will be paid and issued, respectively, pursuant to the merger
agreement is fixed, and an election to receive stock
consideration or cash consideration is subject to a proration
feature. As a result, if Mariner stockholders elect, in the
aggregate, to receive cash in an amount greater than the
aggregate cash consideration payable under the merger agreement,
then those holders electing to receive all cash consideration
will be prorated down (in accordance with their respective
shares for which the cash consideration was elected) and will
receive Apache stock as a portion of the overall consideration
they receive for their shares. On the other hand, if Mariner
stockholders elect, in the aggregate, to receive stock in an
amount greater than the aggregate number of shares issuable
under the merger agreement, then those holders electing to
receive all stock consideration will be prorated down (in
accordance with their respective shares for which the stock
consideration was elected) and will receive cash as a portion of
the overall consideration they receive for their shares.
1
Based on the closing price of $108.06 for Apache common stock on
the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, on April 14, 2010,
the last trading day before the public announcement of the
merger agreement, the mixed consideration represented
approximately $26.22 in value for each share of Mariner common
stock. Based on the closing price of $[] for Apache common
stock on the NYSE on [], 2010, the most recent practicable
trading day prior to the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus, the mixed consideration represented
approximately $[] in value for each share of Mariner
common stock. The market price of Apache common stock will
fluctuate prior to the merger, and the market price of Apache
common stock received by Mariner stockholders upon completion of
the merger could be greater or less than the current market
price of Apache common stock. See Risk Factors.
|
|
Q:
|
What
happens if the merger is not completed?
|
|
|
A: |
If the merger agreement is not approved and adopted by Mariner
stockholders or if the merger is not completed for any other
reason, you will not receive any consideration for your shares
of Mariner common stock in connection with the merger. Instead,
Mariner will remain an independent public company and its common
stock will continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE. If the
merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances,
Mariner may be required to pay Apache a termination fee of
$67 million as described under The Merger
Agreement Termination, Amendment and Waiver.
See Risk Factors Risks Relating to the
Merger Failure to complete the merger could
negatively impact the stock price and the future business and
financial results of Mariner.
|
|
|
Q:
|
What will
happen to Mariners stock options and restricted stock in
the merger?
|
|
|
A: |
Upon completion of the merger, each outstanding option to
purchase Mariner common stock will be converted into a fully
exercisable option to purchase the number of shares of Apache
common stock obtained by multiplying the number of Mariner
shares subject to the option by the 0.24347 exchange ratio, with
a per share exercise price equal to the existing
per-Mariner-share exercise price divided by the 0.24347 exchange
ratio.
|
In addition, upon completion of the merger, each outstanding
unvested share of Mariner restricted stock (other than shares of
restricted stock granted pursuant to Mariners 2008
Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program, which are
referred to as the Performance-Based Restricted Stock) will vest
and will entitle the holder to the merger consideration in
respect of each such vested share. See The Merger
Agreement Employee Stock Options; Restricted
Shares.
Also, upon completion of the merger, 40% of each outstanding
award of Performance-Based Restricted Stock held by Mariner
employees will vest and will entitle the holder to the merger
consideration in respect of each such vested share, and the
remaining portion of each award of Performance-Based Restricted
Stock will be cancelled. Partial vesting of outstanding
Performance-Based Restricted Stock awards occurs solely as a
result of the terms of the merger agreement; otherwise, under
the terms of Mariners 2008 Long-Term Performance-Based
Restricted Stock Program, 100% of the Performance-Based
Restricted Stock would be forfeited. On the date the merger
agreement was executed, the value of merger consideration
associated with such partial vesting was approximately $12.4
million based on a price of $26 per share for Mariner common
stock. See The Merger Agreement Employee
Stock Options; Restricted Shares and The
Merger Interests of the Mariner Directors and
Executive Officers in the Merger Treatment of Equity
Awards.
|
|
Q:
|
When must
I elect the type of merger consideration that I prefer to
receive?
|
|
|
A: |
Holders of Mariner common stock who wish to elect the type of
merger consideration they prefer to receive pursuant to the
merger should review and follow carefully the instructions set
forth in the election form provided to Mariner stockholders
together with this proxy statement/prospectus or in a separate
mailing. These instructions require that a properly completed
and signed election form be received by the exchange agent by
the election deadline, which is 5:00 p.m., New York time,
on [], 2010. If the merger is consummated, each Mariner
stockholder who did not submit a properly completed and signed
election
|
2
|
|
|
form to the exchange agent by the election deadline will receive
a mix of cash and stock consideration consisting of $7.80 in
cash and 0.17043 shares of Apache common stock in exchange
for each Mariner share.
|
|
|
Q:
|
What am I
being asked to vote on?
|
|
|
A: |
Mariner stockholders are being asked to vote on the following
proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
to approve and adopt the merger agreement, as it may be amended
from time to time; and
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment of the special meeting to a later
date or dates if necessary to solicit additional proxies if
there are insufficient votes to approve and adopt the merger
agreement at the time of the special meeting.
|
The approval by Mariner stockholders of the proposal to approve
and adopt the merger agreement is a condition to the obligations
of Mariner and Apache to complete the merger.
|
|
Q:
|
Does
Mariners board of directors recommend that stockholders
approve and adopt the merger agreement?
|
|
|
A: |
Yes. The Mariner board of directors has approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
the merger, and determined that these transactions are advisable
and in the best interests of Mariner and its stockholders.
Therefore, the Mariner board of directors unanimously recommends
that you vote FOR the proposal to approve and
adopt the merger agreement at the special meeting. See The
Merger Recommendation of the Mariner Board of
Directors and its Reasons for the Merger.
|
In considering the recommendation of Mariners board of
directors, stockholders of Mariner should be aware that members
of Mariners board of directors and its executive officers
have agreements and arrangements that provide them with
interests in the merger that may be different from, or in
addition to, those of Mariner stockholders. See The
Merger Interests of the Mariner Directors and
Executive Officers in the Merger.
|
|
Q:
|
What
stockholder vote is required for the approval of each
proposal?
|
|
|
A: |
The following are the vote requirements for the proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approval and Adoption of the Merger
Agreement. The affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Mariner common stock
entitled to vote on the proposal, either in person or
represented by proxy. Accordingly, abstentions and unvoted
shares will have the same effect as votes
AGAINST approval and adoption.
|
|
|
|
Adjournment. The affirmative vote of holders
of a majority of the shares of Mariner common stock present in
person or represented by proxy at the special meeting and
entitled to vote thereat. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal.
|
Your vote is very important. You are encouraged to submit a
proxy as soon as possible.
|
|
Q:
|
What
constitutes a quorum for the special meeting?
|
|
|
A: |
The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority
of the outstanding shares of Mariner common stock is necessary
to constitute a quorum at the special meeting. If a stockholder
is not present in person or represented by proxy at the special
meeting, such stockholders shares will not be counted for
purposes of calculating a quorum. Abstentions and broker
non-votes count as present for establishing a quorum.
|
3
|
|
Q:
|
If my
shares are held in street name by my bank, broker or
other nominee will they automatically vote my shares for
me?
|
|
|
A: |
No. If you hold shares of Mariner common stock in an
account at a bank, broker or other nominee and do not chose to
attend the special meeting in person, you must provide your
bank, broker or other nominee with instructions as to how to
vote your shares of Mariner common stock. You may also vote in
person at the special meeting; however, if you wish to do so,
you must bring a proxy from the bank, broker or other nominee
identifying you as the beneficial owner of such shares of
Mariner common stock and authorizing you to vote. Brokers will
NOT vote shares of Mariner common stock held in street
name unless you have instructed your broker how to vote. A
failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the approval and adoption of the
merger agreement.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Are there
risks associated with the merger that I should consider in
deciding how to vote?
|
|
|
A: |
Yes. There are a number of risks related to the merger that are
discussed in this proxy statement/prospectus and in other
documents incorporated by reference. You should read carefully
the detailed description of the risks associated with the merger
and the operations of Apache after the merger described in
Risk Factors.
|
|
|
Q:
|
If my
Mariner stock is certificated, should I send in my stock
certificates with my proxy card?
|
|
|
A: |
No. Please do not send your Mariner stock certificates with
your proxy card. Rather, prior to the election deadline, send
your completed, signed election form, together with your Mariner
common stock certificates (or a properly completed notice of
guaranteed delivery) to the exchange agent. Please note that
most of Mariners shares are held in book-entry form and
are uncertificated, which means that they are not represented by
stock certificates. The election form for your Mariner shares
and your instructions will be delivered to you together with
this proxy statement/prospectus or in a separate mailing. If
your shares of Mariner common stock are held in street
name by your broker or other nominee, you should follow
their instructions for making an election.
|
|
|
Q:
|
What are
the tax consequences of the merger?
|
|
|
A: |
Apache and Mariner each expect the merger to qualify as a
reorganization that is tax free pursuant to Section 368(a)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to the extent
Mariner stockholders receive stock pursuant to the merger.
|
Please review carefully the information under the caption
The Merger Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Consequences of the Merger for a description of
material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
merger. The tax consequences to you will depend on your own
situation. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor
for a full understanding of the tax consequences of the merger
to you.
|
|
Q:
|
When do
Apache and Mariner expect to complete the merger?
|
|
|
A: |
Apache and Mariner are working to complete the merger as quickly
as practicable. Apache and Mariner currently expect the merger
to be completed during the third quarter of 2010, subject to the
approval and adoption of the merger agreement by Mariner
stockholders, governmental and regulatory approvals and other
usual and customary closing conditions. However, no assurance
can be given as to when, or if, the merger will occur. See
The Merger Agreement Conditions to the
Merger.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Will I
receive dividends on any Apache common stock I receive in the
merger?
|
|
|
A: |
Mariner historically has retained its earnings for the
development of its business and, accordingly, has not paid
dividends since it commenced regular way trading on
March 3, 2006 on the NYSE. Mariners existing bank
credit facility and indentures governing its senior unsecured
notes contain certain covenants that restrict Mariners
ability to pay dividends. However, after the merger is
completed, you will be entitled to receive any dividends
declared by Apaches board of directors with a record date
after the
|
4
|
|
|
effective time of the merger on any shares of Apache common
stock you receive pursuant to the merger. Apache has paid cash
dividends on its common stock for 45 consecutive years through
December 31, 2009. However, when, and if, declared by
Apaches board of directors, future dividend payments will
depend upon Apaches level of earnings, financial
requirements and other relevant factors.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Where
will my shares be traded after the merger?
|
|
|
A: |
Apache common stock will continue to be traded on the NYSE, the
Chicago Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ National Market under the
symbol APA. Mariner common stock will no longer be
traded.
|
|
|
Q:
|
What will
Apache stockholders receive in the merger?
|
|
|
A: |
Apache common stockholders will simply retain the Apache common
stock they currently own. They will not receive any additional
Apache common stock in the merger.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Am I
entitled to appraisal rights?
|
|
|
A: |
If the merger is approved and adopted by Mariner stockholders,
Mariner stockholders who do not vote in favor of the approval
and adoption of the merger agreement and who properly demand
appraisal of their shares will be entitled to appraisal rights
in connection with the merger under Section 262 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or the DGCL.
For more information regarding appraisal rights, see
Appraisal Rights. In addition, a copy of
Section 262 of the DGCL is attached to this proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex C.
|
|
|
Q:
|
When and
where is the special meeting?
|
|
|
A: |
The special meeting will be held on [], 2010 at [],
local time, at Mariners principal executive offices
located at One BriarLake Plaza, 2000 West Sam Houston
Parkway South, Suite 2000, Houston, Texas 77042.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Who can
vote at the special meeting?
|
|
|
A: |
All holders of Mariner common stock who held shares at the close
of business on the record date for the special meeting
([], 2010) are entitled to receive notice of and to
vote at the special meeting, provided that such shares remain
outstanding on the date of the special meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof. As of the close of business
on the record date, there were [] shares of Mariner
common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special
meeting, held by approximately [] holders of record. Each
share of Mariner common stock is entitled to one vote.
|
|
|
A: |
Yes, your vote is very important. If you do not submit a proxy
or vote in person at the special meeting, it will be more
difficult for Mariner to obtain the necessary quorum to hold the
special meeting. In addition, if you fail to vote, or if you
abstain, that will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the approval and adoption of the
merger agreement. If you hold your shares through a bank, broker
or other nominee, your bank, broker or other nominee will not be
able to cast a vote on the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement without instructions from you. The Mariner board of
directors unanimously recommends that you vote
FOR the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement.
|
|
|
Q:
|
What
happens if I sell my shares after the record date but before the
special meeting?
|
|
|
A: |
The record date for the special meeting is earlier than the date
of the special meeting and the date that the merger is expected
to be completed. If you sell or otherwise transfer your Mariner
shares after the record date but before the date of the special
meeting, you will retain your right to vote at the special
meeting. However, you will not have the right to receive the
merger consideration to be received by Mariners
stockholders in the merger. In order to receive the merger
consideration, you must hold your shares through completion of
the merger.
|
5
|
|
Q:
|
What do I
need to do now?
|
|
|
A: |
After you have carefully read this proxy statement/prospectus,
please respond by completing, signing and dating your proxy card
and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or, if
available, by submitting your proxy by telephone or through the
Internet as soon as possible so that your shares of Mariner
common stock will be represented and voted at the special
meeting.
|
Please refer to your proxy card or the information forwarded by
your bank, broker or other nominee to see which voting options
are available to you.
The Internet and telephone proxy submission procedures are
designed to verify your stock holdings and to allow you to
confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.
The method by which you submit a proxy will in no way limit your
right to vote at the special meeting if you later decide to
attend the meeting in person. If your shares of Mariner common
stock are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee,
you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder
of record, to be able to vote in person at the special meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
How will
my proxy be voted?
|
|
|
A: |
All shares of Mariner common stock entitled to vote and
represented by properly completed proxies received prior to the
special meeting, and not revoked, will be voted at the special
meeting as instructed on the proxies. If you properly
complete, sign and return a proxy card, but do not indicate how
your shares of Mariner common stock should be voted, the shares
of Mariner common stock represented by your proxy will be voted
as the Mariner board of directors recommends and therefore
FOR the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement and FOR any proposal to adjourn the
special meeting to a later date or dates if necessary to solicit
additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to approve
and adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special
meeting.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Can I
revoke my proxy or change my vote after I have delivered my
proxy?
|
|
|
A: |
Yes. You may revoke or change your proxy at any time before your
proxy is voted. You can change your proxy by delivering a later
dated proxy using any of the methods listed above. You can
revoke your proxy by delivering written notice of revocation to
The Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company at the
address set forth in The Mariner Special
Meeting Manner of Voting. You also can attend
the meeting, withdraw your proxy and vote your shares
personally. Your attendance at the meeting will not constitute
automatic revocation of your proxy. If your shares are held in
the name of a broker, bank or other nominee and you have
directed the record holder to vote your shares, you should
instruct the record holder to change your vote or obtain a proxy
from the broker, bank or other nominee to do so yourself.
|
|
|
Q:
|
What
should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials
for the special meeting?
|
|
|
A: |
You may receive more than one set of voting materials for the
special meeting, including multiple copies of this proxy
statement/prospectus and multiple proxy cards or voting
instruction cards. For example, if you hold your shares of
Mariner common stock in more than one brokerage account, you
will receive a separate voting instruction card for each
brokerage account in which you hold shares of Mariner common
stock. If you are a holder of record and your shares of Mariner
common stock are registered in more than one name, you will
receive more than one proxy card. Please complete, sign, date
and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you
receive.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Who can
answer my questions?
|
|
|
A: |
Mariner stockholders should call Morrow & Co., LLC,
Mariners information agent/proxy solicitor, toll-free at
(800) 278-2141
(banks and brokers call collect at
(203) 658-9400)
with any questions about the merger or the special meeting, or
to obtain additional copies of this proxy statement/prospectus
or proxy cards.
|
6
SUMMARY
The following is a summary that highlights information
contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. This summary may
not contain all of the information that is important to you. For
a more complete description of the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, you are
encouraged to read carefully this entire proxy
statement/prospectus, including the attached Annexes. In
addition, you are encouraged to read the information
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus,
which includes important business and financial information
about Apache and Mariner that has been filed with the SEC. You
may obtain the information incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement/prospectus without charge by following the
instructions in the section entitled Where You Can Find
More Information; Incorporation by Reference.
The
Companies (See page [])
Apache
Corporation
Apache, a Delaware corporation formed in 1954, is an independent
energy company that explores for, develops and produces natural
gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids. In North America,
Apaches exploration and production interests are focused
in the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf Coast, East Texas, the Permian
Basin, the Anadarko Basin and the Western Sedimentary Basin of
Canada. Outside of North America, Apache has exploration and
production interests onshore Egypt, offshore Western Australia,
offshore the United Kingdom in the North Sea (North Sea), and
onshore Argentina. Apache also has exploration interests on the
Chilean side of the island of Tierra del Fuego.
Apaches common stock is listed on the NYSE, the Chicago
Stock Exchange, and the NASDAQ National Market and trades under
the symbol APA.
Apaches principal executive offices are located at One
Post Oak Central, 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100,
Houston, Texas 77056, its telephone number is
(713) 296-6000
and its website is www.apachecorp.com.
Mariner
Energy, Inc.
Mariner, a Delaware corporation formed in 1983, is an
independent oil and gas exploration, development, and production
company headquartered in Houston, Texas, with principal
operations in the Permian Basin, Gulf Coast and the Gulf of
Mexico.
Mariners common stock is listed on the NYSE and trades
under the symbol ME.
Mariners principal executive offices are located at One
BriarLake Plaza, 2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South,
Suite 2000, Houston, Texas 77042, its telephone number is
(713) 954-5500
and its website is www.mariner-energy.com.
ZMZ
Acquisitions LLC
ZMZ Acquisitions LLC, which is sometimes referred to as Merger
Sub, is a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Apache. Merger Sub was formed solely for the
purpose of entering into the merger agreement. Merger Sub has
not carried on any activities to date, except for activities
incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in
connection with the merger.
Merger Subs principal executive offices are located at One
Post Oak Central, 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100,
Houston, Texas 77056 and its telephone number is
(713) 296-6000.
The
Merger (See page [])
Apache, Merger Sub and Mariner have entered into the merger
agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement and in accordance with Delaware law, Mariner will be
merged with and
7
into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub continuing as the surviving
entity. Upon completion of the merger, Mariner will cease to
exist and Mariner common stock will no longer be outstanding or
publicly traded.
Under the merger agreement, Mariner stockholders may elect to
receive consideration consisting of cash, shares of Apache
common stock or a combination of both in exchange for their
shares of Mariner common stock, subject to a proration feature.
Mariner stockholders electing to receive a mix of cash and stock
consideration and non-electing stockholders will receive $7.80
in cash and 0.17043 shares of Apache common stock in
exchange for each share of Mariner common stock. Subject to
proration, Mariner stockholders electing to receive all cash
will receive $26.00 in cash per Mariner share and Mariner
stockholders electing to receive only Apache common stock will
receive 0.24347 shares of Apache common stock in exchange
for each share of Mariner common stock.
The aggregate cash consideration to be received by Mariner
stockholders pursuant to the merger will be fixed at an amount
equal to the product of $7.80 and the number of shares of
Mariner common stock outstanding immediately prior to the
closing of the merger less 714,887 shares of outstanding
unvested restricted stock that will be cancelled upon the
merger. Such cash amount is expected to be approximately
$800 million. Similarly, the aggregate number of shares of
Apache common stock to be received by Mariner stockholders
pursuant to the merger will be fixed at a number equal to the
product of 0.17043 and the number of shares of Mariner common
stock outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the merger
less 714,887 shares of outstanding unvested restricted stock
that will be cancelled upon the merger. Such number is expected
to be approximately 17.5 million shares of Apache common
stock. Accordingly, if Mariner stockholders elect, in the
aggregate, to receive cash in an amount greater than the
aggregate cash consideration payable under the merger agreement,
then those holders electing to receive all cash consideration
will be prorated down and will receive Apache stock as a portion
of the overall consideration they receive for their shares. On
the other hand, if Mariner stockholders elect, in the aggregate,
to receive stock in an amount greater than the aggregate number
of shares issuable under the merger agreement, then those
holders electing to receive all stock consideration will be
prorated down and will receive cash as a portion of the overall
consideration they receive for their shares. As a result,
Mariner stockholders that make a valid election to receive all
cash or all stock consideration may not receive merger
consideration entirely in the form elected.
The share exchange ratios in the merger agreement are fixed and
will not change between now and the completion of the merger,
regardless of whether the market price of either Apache or
Mariner common stock changes. The market price of Apache common
stock will fluctuate prior to the merger, and the market price
of Apache common stock received by Mariner stockholders after
completion of the merger could be greater or less than the
current market price of Apache common stock and the price of
Apache common stock at the election deadline. In addition, at
the time of the completion of the merger, the values of the
three forms of merger consideration that Mariner stockholders
will have the right to receive (which are
(i) 0.24347 shares of Apache common stock per Mariner
share, subject to proration, (ii) $26.00 in cash per
Mariner share, subject to proration, or (iii) a combination
of $7.80 in cash and 0.17043 shares of Apache common stock
per Mariner share) may not be equal due to fluctuations in the
market price of Apache common stock. See Risk
Factors Risks Relating to the Merger As
a result of the consideration election and proration provisions
of the merger agreement, and because the market price of Apache
common stock will fluctuate, Mariner stockholders cannot be sure
of the aggregate value of the merger consideration that they
will receive.
Apache will not issue any fractional shares of its common stock
in connection with the merger. For each fractional share that
would otherwise be issued, Apache will pay cash (without
interest) in an amount equal to the product of the fractional
share and the average of the closing price of Apache common
stock on the NYSE, as reported in The Wall Street Journal, for
the five consecutive trading days ending on the calendar day
immediately prior to the closing date of the merger.
The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference.
You should read the merger agreement in its entirety because
it is the legal document that governs the merger.
8
Election
Procedures (See page [])
Mariner stockholders of record as of the close of business on
the record date for the special meeting will receive (together
with this proxy statement/prospectus or in a separate mailing)
an election form that will allow each Mariner stockholder to
specify the number of Mariner shares with respect to which such
holder elects to receive: (i) the stock consideration,
(ii) the cash consideration or (iii) the mixed
consideration. You must complete properly and deliver to the
exchange agent your election form along with your stock
certificates, if any, (or a properly completed notice of
guaranteed delivery). Do not send your stock certificates or
election form with your proxy card.
Election forms and stock certificates (or a properly completed
notice of guaranteed delivery) must be received by the exchange
agent by the election deadline, which is 5:00 p.m., New
York time, on [], 2010. Once you tender your stock
certificates, if any, to the exchange agent, you may not
transfer your shares of Mariner common stock until the merger is
completed, unless you revoke your election by a written notice
to the exchange agent that is received prior to the election
deadline.
If you fail to submit a properly completed election form prior
to the election deadline, you will be deemed not to have made an
election. As a holder making no election, you will receive the
mixed consideration in the merger.
If you own shares of Mariner common stock in street
name through a bank, broker or other nominee and you wish
to make an election, you should seek instructions from the bank,
broker or other nominee holding your shares concerning how to
make your election.
Treatment
of Equity Awards (See page [])
Upon completion of the merger, each outstanding option to
purchase Mariner common stock will be converted into a fully
exercisable option to purchase the number of shares of Apache
common stock obtained by multiplying the number of Mariner
shares subject to the option by the 0.24347 exchange ratio, with
a per share exercise price equal to the existing
per-Mariner-share exercise price divided by the 0.24347 exchange
ratio. All outstanding options to acquire Mariner common stock
were fully vested and exercisable by December 31, 2008.
In addition, upon completion of the merger, each outstanding
share of Mariner restricted stock (other than Performance-Based
Restricted Stock) will vest and will entitle the holder to the
merger consideration in respect of each such vested share. In
the merger agreement, Apache agreed that 40% of each outstanding
award of Performance-Based Restricted Stock held by
Mariners employees will vest and will entitle the holder
to the merger consideration in respect of each such vested share
and the remaining portion will be cancelled. Partial vesting of
outstanding Performance-Based Restricted Stock awards occurs
solely as a result of the terms of the merger agreement;
otherwise, under the terms of Mariners 2008 Long-Term
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program, 100% of outstanding
Performance-Based Restricted Stock would be forfeited. Apache
agreed to the partial vesting in order to provide additional
incentive to senior Mariner employees to remain employed through
the closing of the merger, to foster a positive working
relationship with Apaches future employees, and in
recognition of the fact that the shares would otherwise be
forfeited in only the third year of the ten-year program. On the
date the merger agreement was executed, the value of merger
consideration associated with such partial vesting was
approximately $12.4 million based on a price of $26 per
share for Mariner common stock.
Recommendation
of the Mariner Board of Directors and its Reasons for the Merger
(See page [])
The Mariner board of directors unanimously determined that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement are advisable and in the best interests of Mariner and
its stockholders, and approved and adopted the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby. The Mariner board
unanimously recommends that Mariner stockholders vote
FOR the proposals to approve and adopt the merger
agreement and to approve any adjournment of the special meeting
if necessary or appropriate to solicit additional proxies.
9
As described under the heading The Merger
Interests of the Mariner Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger, Mariners directors and executive officers
will receive financial benefits that may be different from, or
in addition to, those of Mariner stockholders in the merger.
Opinion
of Mariners Financial Advisor (See
page [])
On April 14, 2010, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC,
which we refer to as Credit Suisse, rendered its oral opinion to
Mariners board of directors (which was subsequently
confirmed in writing by delivery of Credit Suisses written
opinion dated the same date) to the effect that, as of
April 14, 2010, the merger consideration to be received by
the holders of Mariner common stock in the merger was fair, from
a financial point of view, to such holders.
Credit Suisses opinion was directed to Mariners
board of directors and only addressed the fairness to the
holders of Mariner common stock, from a financial point of view,
of the merger consideration to be received by such holders in
the merger, and did not address any other aspect or implication
of the merger. The summary of Credit Suisses opinion in
this proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of its written opinion, which is
included as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus and
sets forth the procedures followed, assumptions made,
qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken and
other matters considered by Credit Suisse in preparing its
opinion. However, neither Credit Suisses written opinion
nor the summary of its opinion and the related analyses set
forth in this proxy statement/prospectus are intended to be, and
do not constitute advice or a recommendation to any holder of
Mariner common stock as to how such stockholder should act or
vote with respect to any matter relating to the merger. See
The Merger Opinion of Mariners Financial
Advisor.
Directors
and Executive Officers of Apache After the Merger (See
page [])
The directors and executive officers of Apache prior to the
merger will continue as the directors and executive officers of
Apache after the merger.
Mariner
Stockholder Meeting; Stockholders Entitled to Vote; Vote
Required (See page [])
The special meeting of the stockholders of Mariner will be for
the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on the proposal to approve and adopt the
merger agreement, as it may be amended from time to time;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on any proposal to adjourn the special
meeting to a later date or dates if necessary to solicit
additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to approve
and adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special
meeting; and
|
|
|
|
to transact any other business that may properly come before the
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting.
|
All holders of Mariner common stock who held shares at the close
of business on the record date for the special meeting
([], 2010) are entitled to receive notice of and to
vote at the special meeting, or any postponement or adjournment
thereof, provided that such shares remain outstanding on the
date of the special meeting. As of the close of business on the
record date, there were [] shares of Mariner common
stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting.
Each share of Mariner common stock is entitled to one vote at
the Mariner special meeting.
The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority
of the outstanding shares of Mariner common stock is necessary
to constitute a quorum at the special meeting. The affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Mariner common stock entitled to vote on the proposal as of the
Mariner record date, either in person or represented by proxy,
is necessary for the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement. Approval of any proposal to adjourn the special
meeting if necessary to solicit
10
additional proxies requires the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the shares of Mariner common stock present in
person or represented by proxy at the special meeting and
entitled to vote thereat.
If a Mariner stockholder fails to vote, or if a Mariner
stockholder abstains, that will have the same effect as votes
cast AGAINST the approval and adoption of the
merger agreement. Abstentions and broker non-votes
will have the same effect as votes cast
AGAINST approval of any proposal to adjourn
the special meeting if necessary to solicit additional proxies.
Apache
Stockholder Approval is Not Required (See
page [])
Apache stockholders are not required to adopt the merger
agreement or approve the merger or the issuance of shares of
Apache common stock in connection with the merger.
Ownership
of Apache After the Merger (See page [])
Apache will issue approximately 17.5 million shares of
Apache common stock to former Mariner stockholders pursuant to
the merger. Immediately following the completion of the merger,
Apache expects to have approximately 381.7 million shares
of common stock outstanding. Mariner stockholders are therefore
expected to hold approximately 5% of the combined companys
common stock outstanding immediately after the merger.
Consequently, Mariner stockholders, as a general matter, will
have less influence over the management and policies of Apache
than they currently exercise over the management and policies of
Mariner.
Share
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers of Mariner (See
page [])
At the close of business on the record date for the special
meeting ([], 2010), the directors and executive officers
of Mariner and their affiliates beneficially owned and were
entitled to vote [] shares of Mariner common
stock, collectively representing approximately []% of the
shares of Mariner common stock outstanding and entitled to vote
on the record date. It is expected that Mariners directors
and executive officers will vote their shares FOR
the approval and adoption of the merger agreement, although
none of them has entered into any agreement requiring them to do
so.
Interests
of the Mariner Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
(See page [])
In considering the recommendation of Mariners board of
directors with respect to the merger, Mariner stockholders
should be aware that the executive officers and directors of
Mariner have certain interests in the merger that may be
different from, or in addition to, the interests of Mariner
stockholders. Mariners board of directors was aware of
these interests and considered them, among other matters, when
adopting a resolution to approve the merger agreement and
recommending that Mariner stockholders vote to approve and adopt
the merger agreement. Upon consummation of the merger, and
assuming each executive officer experiences a termination
immediately thereafter that entitles him or her to the highest
amount of severance payable, Mariners six non-employee
directors and 14 executive officers will receive accelerated
equity awards and severance benefits with an aggregate estimated
value of approximately $85.3 million.
Risks
Relating to the Merger (See page [])
You should be aware of and carefully consider the risks relating
to the merger described under Risk Factors. These
risks include possible difficulties in combining the two
companies, which have previously operated independently.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (See
page [])
Apache and Mariner each expect the merger to qualify as a
reorganization that is tax free pursuant to Section 368(a)
of the Internal Revenue Code to the extent Mariner stockholders
receive stock pursuant to the merger.
11
Please review carefully the information under the caption
The Merger Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Consequences of the Merger for a description of the
material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
merger. The tax consequences to you will depend on your own
situation. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor
for a full understanding of the tax consequences of the merger
to you.
Accounting
Treatment (See page [])
Apache will account for the merger using the acquisition method
of accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, which are referred to as GAAP. The merger will be
accounted for as a single line of business. Apache will record
net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed from Mariner at their respective fair values
at the date of the completion of the merger. Any excess of the
purchase price, which will equal the cash consideration plus the
market value, at the date of completion of the merger, of the
Apache common stock issued as consideration for the merger, over
the net fair value of such assets and liabilities will be
recorded as goodwill.
Listing
of Shares of Apache Common Stock; Delisting and Deregistration
of Mariner Common Stock (See page [])
Approval of the listing on the NYSE of the shares of Apache
common stock issuable pursuant to the merger agreement, subject
to official notice of issuance, is a condition to each
partys obligation to complete the merger. If the merger is
completed, shares of Mariner common stock will be delisted from
the NYSE and deregistered under the Exchange Act. In addition to
listing the shares of Apache common stock issuable pursuant to
the merger agreement on the NYSE, Apache intends to list the
shares issuable pursuant to the merger agreement on the NASDAQ
National Market and the Chicago Stock Exchange.
Appraisal
Rights in the Merger (See page [])
If the merger is approved and adopted by the Mariner
stockholders, Mariner stockholders who do not vote in favor of
the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and who
properly demand appraisal of their shares will be entitled to
appraisal rights in connection with the merger under
Section 262 of the DGCL. Mariner stockholders who wish to
seek appraisal of their shares are in any case urged to seek the
advice of counsel with respect to the exercise of appraisal
rights.
Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware that
the fair value of their shares as determined pursuant to
Section 262 of the DGCL could be more than, the same as or
less than the value of the consideration they would receive
pursuant to the merger if they did not seek appraisal of their
shares.
The DGCL requirements for exercising appraisal rights are
described in further detail in this proxy statement/prospectus,
and the relevant section of the DGCL regarding appraisal rights
is reproduced and attached as Annex C.
Conditions
to the Merger (See page [])
The following conditions must be satisfied or waived, where
legally permissible, before the proposed merger can be
consummated:
|
|
|
|
|
the approval and adoption of the merger agreement by the
requisite affirmative vote of Mariners stockholders;
|
|
|
|
the expiration or termination of the waiting period (and any
extension of the waiting period) applicable to the merger under
the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, which is
referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as the HSR Act;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of the
Form S-4
registration statement, of which this proxy statement/prospectus
is a part, and the absence of a stop order suspending the
effectiveness of the
Form S-4
or proceedings for such purpose having been initiated or
threatened by the SEC;
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
the approval for listing on the NYSE of the shares of Apache
common stock issuable to the Mariner stockholders pursuant to
the merger agreement, subject to official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any statute, rule or regulation prohibiting the
merger, or any order or injunction of a court of competent
jurisdiction preventing the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the receipt by each of Mariner and Apache of an opinion from its
outside counsel to the effect that for federal income tax
purposes the merger will be treated as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code
and that each of Apache and Mariner will be a party to such
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the
Internal Revenue Code;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of the representations and warranties of Apache,
Merger Sub and Mariner in the merger agreement, subject to
certain materiality thresholds;
|
|
|
|
the performance in all material respects by each of Apache and
Merger Sub, on the one hand, and Mariner, on the other hand, of
its respective covenants required to be performed by it under
the merger agreement at or prior to the closing date;
|
|
|
|
receipt of certificates by executive officers of each of Apache
and Merger Sub, on the one hand, and Mariner, on the other hand,
to the effect that the conditions described in the preceding two
bullet points have been satisfied;
|
|
|
|
there not having occurred a material adverse effect on either
party since the date of the merger agreement, the effects of
which are continuing; and
|
|
|
|
the number of Mariner shares for which appraisal rights are
properly exercised does not exceed 50% of the Mariner shares
outstanding immediately prior to the merger.
|
On May 3, 2010, the Antitrust Division and the FTC granted
early termination of the statutory waiting period under the HSR
Act. Apache and Mariner cannot be certain when, or if, the other
conditions to the merger will be satisfied or waived, or that
the merger will be completed.
Regulatory
Approvals Required for the Merger (See
page [])
The merger is subject to review by the Antitrust Division of the
U.S. Department of Justice, which is referred to as the
Antitrust Division, and the Federal Trade Commission, which is
referred to as the FTC, under the HSR Act. Under the HSR Act,
Apache and Mariner are required to make premerger notification
filings and to await the expiration or early termination of the
statutory waiting period (and any extension of the waiting
period) prior to completing the merger. Apache and Mariner each
filed its required HSR notification and report form with respect
to the merger on April 26, 2010, commencing the initial
30-day
waiting period. On May 3, 2010, the Antitrust Division and
the FTC granted early termination of the statutory waiting
period under the HSR Act.
No
Solicitation and Change in Recommendation (See
page [])
Under the merger agreement, Mariner has agreed not to (and has
agreed to cause its officers, directors, employees, agents and
representatives not to), among other things, (i) initiate,
solicit or knowingly encourage or knowingly facilitate any
acquisition proposal, (ii) have any discussion with or
provide or cause to be provided any non-public information to
any person relating to an acquisition proposal, or engage or
participate in any negotiations concerning an acquisition
proposal, (iii) approve, endorse or recommend any
acquisition proposal or (iv) approve, endorse or recommend,
or enter into an agreement to do any of the foregoing with
respect to an acquisition proposal. Mariner may, however, prior
to the approval and adoption of the merger agreement by its
stockholders, communicate with third parties that make
unsolicited acquisition proposals if its board concludes in good
faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and
outside legal counsel, that the acquisition proposal constitutes
or is reasonably likely to lead to a transaction more favorable
to its stockholders. Additionally, prior to the approval and
adoption of the merger agreement by Mariner stockholders,
Mariners board of directors may under certain
circumstances withdraw its recommendation that its stockholders
adopt the merger agreement if it concludes in good faith, after
consultation with its financial
13
advisors and outside legal counsel, that withdrawal of its
recommendation is necessary to comply with its fiduciary duties.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement (See page [])
In general, the merger agreement may be terminated at any time
prior to the effective time of the merger in the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of Apache, Merger Sub and Mariner;
|
|
|
|
by either Apache or Mariner if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger is not consummated on or before January 31,
2011, referred to as the outside date, provided that the
terminating party has not materially breached the merger
agreement in a manner that proximately caused the failure to
consummate the merger on or prior to the outside date;
|
|
|
|
a court or other governmental authority issues a final,
non-appealable order prohibiting the merger; or
|
|
|
|
the Mariner stockholders do not approve and adopt the merger
agreement at the special meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner is in material breach of the merger agreement such that
certain conditions set forth in the merger agreement are not
capable of being satisfied and such breach is not cured prior to
the earlier of 30 days after notice of such breach to
Mariner and the outside date; provided that Apache is not
permitted to so terminate the merger agreement if Apache or
Merger Sub is then in breach of the merger agreement in any
material respect; or
|
|
|
|
prior to the approval and adoption of the merger agreement by
Mariners stockholders, Mariners board of directors
changes its recommendation to vote for approval and adoption of
the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apache or Merger Sub is in material breach of the merger
agreement such that certain conditions set forth in the merger
agreement are not capable of being satisfied and such breach is
not cured prior to the earlier of 30 days after notice of
such breach to Apache and the outside date; provided that
Mariner is not permitted to so terminate the merger agreement if
it is then in breach of the merger agreement in any material
respect; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to the approval and adoption of the merger agreement by
Mariners stockholders, Mariners board of directors
changes its recommendation to vote for approval and adoption of
the merger agreement in order to accept a superior proposal and
authorizes Mariner to enter into a definitive agreement with
respect to the superior proposal.
|
Termination
Fee (See page [])
Under the merger agreement, Mariner may be required to pay to
Apache a termination fee of $67 million (less any Apache
expenses previously reimbursed by Mariner) if the merger
agreement is terminated under certain circumstances. In
connection with the settlement of two stockholder lawsuits, on
August 2, 2010, Apache and Mariner amended the merger
agreement to eliminate the termination fee in the event that
Mariner terminates the merger agreement in order to enter into a
superior proposal with another party. See The
Merger Litigation Relating to the Merger. In
addition, the merger agreement requires each of Apache and
Mariner to reimburse the others expenses, up to
$7.5 million, in certain circumstances when the merger
agreement is terminated.
14
Source of
Funding for the Merger (See page [])
Apaches obligation to complete the merger is not
conditioned upon its obtaining financing. As of June 30,
2010, Apache had $1.8 billion in cash. On July 30,
2010, Apache used $1.5 billion of its existing cash
balance, together with the net proceeds of offerings of
securities, to fund the Deposit made in connection with the BP
Acquisition (such terms as defined in Recent
Developments Potential BP Acquisition below).
Apache expects to fund the cash portion of the merger
consideration payable to Mariner stockholders, which is expected
to equal approximately $800 million as of July 28,
2010, with existing cash balances and commercial paper.
Comparison
of Rights of Apache Stockholders and Mariner Stockholders (See
page [])
As a result of the merger, the holders of Mariner common stock
that receive shares of Apache common stock will become
stockholders of Apache. Following the merger, these Mariner
stockholders will have different rights as stockholders of
Apache than as stockholders of Mariner due to the different
provisions of the governing documents of Mariner and Apache.
These differences are described in more detail under
Comparison of Rights of Apache Stockholders and Mariner
Stockholders.
Litigation
Relating to the Merger (See page [])
In connection with the merger, two stockholder lawsuits styled
as class actions have been filed against Mariner and its board
of directors. The lawsuits are captioned City of Livonia
Employees Retirement System, Individually and on Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated vs. Mariner Energy, Inc, et al.
(filed April 16, 2010 in the District Court of Harris
County, Texas), and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority, individually, and on behalf of all those similarly
situated, vs. Scott D. Josey, et. al. (filed
April 21, 2010 in the Court of Chancery in the State of
Delaware). The plaintiff in the Southeastern Pennsylvania
Transportation Authority lawsuit filed an Amended
Class Action Complaint on May 3, 2010, and also names
Apache, Merger Sub and certain Mariner officers as defendants.
The lawsuits generally allege that (1) Mariners
directors breached their fiduciary duties in negotiating and
approving the merger and by administering a sale process that
failed to maximize stockholder value and (2) Mariner, and
in the case of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority complaint, Apache and Merger Sub, aided and abetted
Mariners directors in breaching their fiduciary duties.
The lawsuits also allege that Mariners directors and
executives stand to receive substantial financial benefits if
the transaction is consummated on its current terms. The
plaintiffs in these lawsuits seek, among other things, to enjoin
the merger and to rescind the merger agreement. Apache and
Mariner believe that these lawsuits are without merit and intend
to vigorously defend these lawsuits.
On August 1, 2010, the parties to the Delaware action
entered into a memorandum of understanding which, when reduced
to a settlement agreement, is intended to be a final resolution
of that action. Also on August 1, 2010, the parties to the
Texas action agreed to be bound by the memorandum of
understanding with respect to that action. In connection with
the settlement, and in exchange for the releases described
below, Apache and Mariner agreed to amend the merger agreement
to eliminate the termination fee in the event that Mariner
terminates the merger agreement in order to enter into a
superior proposal with another party and to make
certain additional disclosures in this proxy
statement/prospectus. Additionally, in the event that any
proceedings regarding appraisal rights under Section 262 of
the DGCL are commenced following the merger, Apache and Mariner
have waived and will not present any argument that shares of
Mariner restricted stock granted pursuant to the 2008 Long-Term
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program will be counted in
determining the total number of Mariner shares outstanding in
such proceeding.
Subject to the completion of
agreed-upon
confirmatory discovery, the parties will negotiate in good faith
to execute a settlement agreement to present to the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware. Pursuant to the settlement,
the Delaware action will be dismissed with prejudice on the
merits, the plaintiffs in the Texas action will voluntarily
dismiss that action with prejudice, and all defendants will be
released from any and all claims relating to, among other
things, the merger, the merger agreement and any disclosures
made in connection therewith. The settlement is subject to
customary conditions, including consummation of the
15
merger, completion of certain confirmatory discovery, class
certification, and final approval by the Court of Chancery of
the State of Delaware.
The settlement will not affect the form or amount of the
consideration to be received by Mariner stockholders in the
merger.
The defendants have denied and continue to deny any wrongdoing
or liability with respect to all claims, events, and
transactions described in these actions. The defendants have
entered into the settlement to eliminate the uncertainty,
burden, risk, expense and distraction of further litigation.
In connection with the settlement, on August 2, 2010,
Apache, Mariner and Merger Sub entered into an amendment to the
merger agreement to effect the elimination of the termination
fee described above. Mariners stockholders are encouraged
to read the full text of Amendment No. 1 to the merger
agreement, which is included in this proxy statement/prospectus
at the end of Annex A and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Recent
Developments
Potential
BP Acquisition
On July 20, 2010, Apache announced the signing of three
definitive purchase and sale agreements, which we refer to as
the BP Purchase Agreements, to acquire the following properties,
which we refer to as the BP Properties, from subsidiaries of BP
plc (we refer to BP plc and such subsidiaries collectively as
BP) for aggregate consideration of approximately
$7.0 billion, subject to customary adjustments in
accordance with the BP Purchase Agreements, which we refer to as
the BP Acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Permian Basin. All of BPs oil and gas
operations, related infrastructure and acreage in the Permian
Basin of West Texas and New Mexico. The assets include interests
in 10 field areas in the Permian Basin (including
Block 16/Coy Waha, Block 31, Brown Basset,
Empire/Yeso, Pegasus, Southeast Lea, Spraberry, Wilshire, North
Misc and Delaware Penn), approximately 405,000 net mineral
and fee acres, 358,000 leasehold acres, approximately 3,629
active wells and three gas processing plants, two of which are
currently operated by BP. Based on Apaches investigation
and review of data provided by BP, these assets produced
15,110 barrels of liquids and 81 MMcf of gas per day
in the first six months of 2010. The Permian Basin assets had
estimated net proved reserves of 140.9 MMboe at
June 30, 2010 (65 percent liquids).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Canada Sedimentary
Basin. Substantially all of BPs Western
Canadian upstream gas assets, including 1,278,000 net
mineral and leasehold acres, interests in approximately 1,600
active wells, eight operated and 14 non-operated gas processing
plants. The position includes many attractive drilling
opportunities ranging from conventional to several
unconventional targets, including shale gas, tight gas and coal
bed methane in historically productive formations including the
Montney, Cadonien and Doig. Based on Apaches investigation
and review of data provided by BP, during the first half of 2010
these properties accounted for 6,529 barrels of liquids and
240 MMcf of gas per day and had estimated net proved
reserves of 223.7 MMboe at June 30, 2010
(94 percent gas). Apache currently has operations in
approximately half of these 13 field areas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Desert, Egypt. BPs interests in
four development licenses and one exploration concession (East
Badr El Din), covering 394,000 net acres south of El
Alamein in the Western Desert of Egypt. These properties are
operated by Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company, a joint venture
between BP and the Government of Egypt. The transaction includes
BPs interests in 65 active wells, a
24-inch gas
line to Dashour, a liquefied petroleum gas plant in Dashour, a
gas processing plant and a
12-inch oil
export line to the El Hamra Terminal on the Mediterranean Sea.
Based on Apaches investigation and review of data provided
by BP, during the first six months of 2010 these properties
accounted for 6,016 barrels of oil and 11 MMcf of gas
per day of BPs production, and had estimated net proved
reserves of 20.2 MMboe at June 30, 2010
(59 percent liquids). The BP Properties in Egypt are
complementary to the over 11 million gross acres in 21
separate concessions in the Western Desert that Apache currently
holds. The Merged Concession Agreement related to the
development licenses runs through 2024, subject to a five year
extension at the option of the operator.
|
16
Of the $7.0 billion purchase price, $3.1 billion is
applicable to the Permian Basin properties, $3.25 billion
is applicable to the Canadian properties and $650 million
is applicable to the Egyptian properties. The effective date of
the BP Acquisition is July 1, 2010. Apache Corporation has
agreed to guarantee the performance of the obligations of its
subsidiaries under the BP Purchase Agreements.
The BP Acquisition is subject to a number of closing conditions,
including clearance under the competition laws of the United
States and Canada, the foreign investment law of Canada and
approval of the Government of Egypt. Because of the relatively
short time period contemplated between signing the BP Purchase
Agreements and the expected closing of the BP Acquisition,
several significant matters commonly resolved prior to closing
such an acquisition have been reserved for after closing. For
example, title review with respect to most of the BP Properties
will not be completed until after closing. In addition, Apache
will not have sufficient time before closing to conduct a full
assessment of any environmental and legal liabilities with
respect to the BP Properties. Also, some of the BP Properties
are subject to preferential purchase rights held by third
parties, and those rights may be exercised before or after
Apache closes the BP Acquisition. Most of the preferential
purchase rights have exercise periods of 30 days after
delivery of notice of the acquisition. Accordingly, the BP
Acquisition is subject to certain post-closing requirements
relating to, among other things, resolution of title,
environmental and legal issues and any exercise by third parties
of preferential purchase rights with respect to certain of the
BP Properties. Prompt notice of the proposed sale of the BP
Properties will be provided to appropriate governmental agencies
and to parties holding preferential rights to purchase such
properties. The transactions comprising the BP Acquisition are
not mutually conditioned, and Apache may close any of these
transactions without closing the others.
Each BP Purchase Agreement may be terminated prior to closing
pursuant to termination provisions that are typical of a
transaction of this type. If a BP Purchase Agreement is
terminated other than as a result of Apaches material
breach or Apaches failure or refusal to close, BP is
required to return the applicable portion of the Deposit (as
further described below) plus interest. BP plc has agreed to
provide a limited guarantee with respect to the BP Purchase
Agreements, principally as to return of the Deposit. If a BP
Purchase Agreement is terminated as a result of Apaches
material breach or Apaches failure or refusal to close, BP
is required to return the applicable portion of the Deposit plus
interest, less an amount equal to five percent of the purchase
price plus interest in such agreement, which we refer to as the
Reverse Breakup Fee. Each BP Purchase Agreement provides that
BPs retention of the Reverse Breakup Fee is the sole and
exclusive remedy of BP in the event of a termination of such
agreement.
On July 30, 2010, Apache made a deposit of
$5.0 billion toward the purchase price of the BP
Properties, which we refer to as the Deposit, to be returned to
Apache or applied to the purchase price, as the case may be. Of
the $5.0 billion Deposit, $1.5 billion is applicable
to the Permian Basin properties, $3.25 billion is
applicable to the Canadian properties and $250 million is
applicable to the Egyptian properties. In Canada, the Deposit
was implemented in the form of a loan from Apache to the BP
subsidiary that is the seller of the Canadian properties which
has been guaranteed by BP plc. From the date of the Deposit
until receipt of regulatory approvals, BP will retain complete
operational control of the BP Properties, subject to customary
covenants regarding the conduct of business in the ordinary
course, maintenance of the properties and similar matters. The
Deposit is not required to be segregated from the operations of
BP, but may be made available for use by BP in its operations.
Should the applicable regulatory approvals not be obtained by a
certain date (for the Permian Basin asset purchase by
October 29, 2010; for the Western Canadian asset purchase
by January 31, 2011; and for the Egyptian asset purchase by
July 19, 2011), the affected transaction will not close and
the applicable portion of the Deposit will be returned. Should
preferential purchase rights with respect to any of the BP
Properties be exercised, the purchase price payable to the
affected BP subsidiary will be reduced accordingly. Apache
estimates that only an immaterial portion of the BP Properties
are subject to preferential purchase rights in favor of third
parties.
To the extent preferential purchase rights are not exercised,
with respect to any portion of the BP Acquisition, Apache will
pay the balance of the allocated consideration and close the
respective transaction as promptly as practicable after receipt
of the various regulatory approvals and contractual consents
applicable to the individual components of the BP Acquisition.
Upon receipt of regulatory approvals in Canada, the
17
instrument representing the loan will convert into ownership of
the equity interests of the BP subsidiary holding the Canadian
properties.
The Deposit and the balance of the consideration to be paid by
Apache in respect of the BP Properties will be financed with
(i) the net proceeds of $2.26 billion received in
connection with Apaches offering of 26,450,000 shares
of common stock, (ii) the net proceeds of
$1.23 billion received in connection with Apaches
offering of 25,300,000 depositary shares, each of which
represents a 1/20th interest in a share of Apaches
6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series D,
(iii) cash on hand, (iv) Apaches existing
revolving credit and commercial paper facilities and
(v) the issuance of term debt. Apache has also arranged a
bridge loan facility to backstop its financing requirements. See
Bridge Financing Facility below.
Apache anticipates that required regulatory approvals and
resolution of any preferential purchase rights, and any transfer
of operational control of the BP Properties, will occur in the
third and fourth quarters of 2010. Apache cannot assure you,
however, that the purchase of the BP Properties will close on
these terms, on a timely basis or at all.
The BP Properties had estimated proved reserves as of
June 30, 2010 of approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
116.4 MMbbls of crude oil and natural gas liquids; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,610 Bcf of natural gas.
|
Using the conventional equivalence of one barrel of oil to six
Mcf of gas (which is not indicative of the price difference
between these resources), the estimated proved reserves
attributable to the BP Properties totaled approximately
384.8 MMboe at June 30, 2010 and were approximately
30 percent liquids and 70 percent gas. Approximately
64 percent of the estimated proved reserves attributable to
the BP Properties are developed reserves. A majority of the
estimated oil and natural gas liquids reserves are located in
the Permian Basin and the majority of the estimated natural gas
reserves are located in Canada.
Production estimates, provided by BP, for the first six months
of 2010 for the BP Properties were approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
27.7 Mbbls per day of crude oil and natural gas
liquids; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
331 MMcf per day of natural gas.
|
Production estimates, provided by BP, for the year ended
December 31, 2009 for the BP Properties were approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
28 Mbbls per day of crude oil and natural gas
liquids; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 MMcf per day of natural gas.
|
The reserves and production estimates mentioned in the preceding
paragraphs are based on Apaches analysis of historical
production data, assumptions regarding capital expenditures and
anticipated production declines.
The foregoing estimates of reserves and production are based on
estimates of Apaches engineers without review by an
independent petroleum engineering firm. Data used to make these
estimates were furnished by BP or obtained from publicly
available sources. Apache cannot assure you that these estimates
of proved reserves and production are accurate. After such data
is reviewed by an independent petroleum engineering firm and
after Apache conducts a more thorough review, the BP Acquisition
reserves and production may differ materially from the amounts
indicated above.
Audited historical financial information for the BP Properties
is not currently available. Apache plans to file separate
financial statements and pro forma financial information, as
required by SEC rules, in a Current Report on
Form 8-K
within the prescribed time period following consummation of the
BP Acquisition. Preliminary leasehold operating statements
provided to Apache by BP indicate that the BP Properties had
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 of between
$520 million and $575 million and for the year ended
December 31, 2009 of between $830 million and
$920 million, while direct operating expenses for the
18
same periods were between $155 million and
$175 million and between $310 million and
$345 million, respectively.
The foregoing preliminary revenue and direct operating expense
estimates were provided by BP, are unaudited, and have not been
reviewed by Apaches independent accountants. Apache cannot
assure you that these preliminary estimates are accurate.
Gulf
of Mexico Shelf Acquisition
On June 10, 2010, Apache announced the completion of its
acquisition of oil and gas assets on the Gulf of Mexico shelf
from Devon Energy Corporation for $1.05 billion in cash.
The acquisition is effective as of January 1, 2010. The
acquired assets comprise 477,000 net acres across 150
blocks. The fields have 80 platforms and 211 production caissons
in waters up to 450 feet deep. Approximately half of the
estimated proved reserves of 41 MMboe are oil and natural
gas liquids. The property interests are projected to produce
9,500 barrels of oil per day and 55 MMcf per day
(net). Apache operates 75 percent of the production. Apache
funded the acquisition primarily from existing cash balances
supplemented with commercial paper.
Second
Quarter 2010 Results
On July 20, 2010, Apache announced its preliminary
unaudited results for the second quarter of 2010. Set forth
below is certain financial and operating data for the quarters
and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Quarter Ended
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Financial data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues and other (thousands)
|
|
$
|
2,971,910
|
|
|
$
|
2,093,378
|
|
|
$
|
5,645,161
|
|
|
$
|
3,727,203
|
|
Income attributable to common stock (thousands)
|
|
|
860,223
|
|
|
|
443,300
|
|
|
|
1,565,204
|
|
|
|
(1,315,060
|
)
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
|
(3.92
|
)
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
1.31
|
|
|
|
4.61
|
|
|
|
(3.92
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
337,618
|
|
|
|
335,637
|
|
|
|
337,273
|
|
|
|
335,372
|
|
Diluted common shares outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
339,377
|
|
|
|
337,365
|
|
|
|
339,292
|
|
|
|
335,372
|
|
Production and pricing data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil volume (barrels per day)
|
|
|
331,280
|
|
|
|
281,836
|
|
|
|
310,103
|
|
|
|
274,652
|
|
Average oil price per barrel
|
|
$
|
74.89
|
|
|
$
|
58.15
|
|
|
$
|
74.74
|
|
|
$
|
50.57
|
|
Natural gas volume (Mcf per day)
|
|
|
1,791,555
|
|
|
|
1,769,623
|
|
|
|
1,751,958
|
|
|
|
3,727,203
|
|
Average natural gas price per Mcf
|
|
$
|
4.01
|
|
|
$
|
3.48
|
|
|
$
|
4.29
|
|
|
$
|
3.65
|
|
NGL volume (barrels per day)
|
|
|
16,992
|
|
|
|
10,626
|
|
|
|
14,444
|
|
|
|
10,394
|
|
Average NGL price per barrel
|
|
$
|
37.21
|
|
|
$
|
23.42
|
|
|
$
|
40.58
|
|
|
$
|
22.39
|
|
Total production (boe per day)
|
|
|
646,866
|
|
|
|
587,400
|
|
|
|
616,540
|
|
|
|
567,947
|
|
Offering
of Common Stock
On July 28, 2010, Apache issued 26,450,000 shares of
common stock to the public at an offering price of $88.00 per
share. Apache will use the net proceeds of approximately
$2.26 billion received in the offering to finance a portion
of the consideration payable in connection with the BP
Acquisition.
Offering
of Depositary Shares Representing Interests in Mandatory
Convertible Preferred Stock
On July 28, 2010, Apache issued 25,300,000 depositary
shares, each representing a 1/20th interest in a share of
Apaches 6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series D, to the public at an offering price
19
of $50.00 per share. Apache will use the net proceeds of
approximately $1.23 billion received in the offering to
finance a portion of the consideration payable in connection
with the BP Acquisition.
Bridge
Financing Facility
In connection with and in contemplation of the BP Acquisition,
Apache entered into a term loan agreement with affiliates of
Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. that provides a
$5.0 billion unsecured bridge facility, which we refer to
as the Bridge Facility, the proceeds of which could be used to
finance a portion of the consideration for the BP Acquisition,
including the Deposit, and to pay certain fees and expenses in
connection with the BP Acquisition. The commitment under the
Bridge Facility has been reduced by $3.5 billion, which is
the amount of the net proceeds from the common stock and
depositary share offerings discussed above. The Bridge Facility
will be used as a backstop in the event that alternative forms
of financing are not available in sufficient amounts at or prior
to such times when Apache is required to fund the consideration
payable for the BP Acquisition. Apache does not currently intend
to draw under the Bridge Facility but instead plans to finance
the BP Acquisition through proceeds from its offering of common
stock, proceeds from its offering of depositary shares, cash on
hand, its existing revolving credit and commercial paper
facilities and the issuance of term debt. Apache did not borrow
under the Bridge Facility to fund the Deposit.
Funds under the Bridge Facility will be available to Apache in
one or more drawings until September 28, 2010. Covenants,
events of default and representations and warranties will be
substantially similar to those in Apaches existing
revolving credit facilities. Apache is required to prepay loans
under the Bridge Facility with 100% of the net cash proceeds of
(a) equity issuances to third parties by Apache or any of
its subsidiaries, (b) indebtedness for borrowed money by
Apache or any of its subsidiaries (with certain exceptions,
including refinancings and draws under existing facilities,
indebtedness for working capital, securitizations in the
ordinary course of business, and commercial paper issued under
Apaches existing commercial paper program), and
(c) asset dispositions by Apache or any of its subsidiaries
outside the ordinary course of business. The Bridge Facility
will mature on September 29, 2010 but may be extended at
Apaches option until December 29, 2010.
All borrowings under the Bridge Facility will bear interest at a
rate equal to either:
|
|
|
|
|
a base rate, which is defined as a rate per annum equal to the
greatest of (a) JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.s prime
rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus .50% and
(c) one-month LIBOR plus 1%, or
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR plus a margin varying from 1.50% to 2.50%.
|
The Bridge Facility will incur a fee after the first funding
under such facility, payable on the average daily undrawn amount
of the Bridge Facility at a per annum rate equal to 0.10% to
0.35%.
20
SELECTED
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL, OPERATING AND RESERVE DATA OF
APACHE
The following table presents selected historical consolidated
financial, operating and reserve data of Apache. The financial
data as of, and for the years ended, December 31, 2009,
2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are derived from Apaches audited
consolidated financial statements for those periods. The
financial data as of, and for the quarterly periods ended,
March 31, 2010 and 2009 are derived from Apaches
unaudited consolidated financial statements for those periods.
Apaches management believes that the companys
interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared on a
basis consistent with its audited financial statements and
include all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a
fair presentation of the results for each interim period.
The information in the following table is only a summary and is
not indicative of the results of future operations of Apache.
You should read the following information together with
Apaches Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, Apaches
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the other
information that Apache has filed with the SEC and incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. See
Where You Can Find More Information; Incorporation by
Reference.
Apache is not required to furnish pro forma financial
information with respect to the merger in this proxy
statement/prospectus because Mariner would not be a significant
subsidiary under any of the financial conditions specified in
Rule 1-02(w)
of SEC
Regulation S-X,
substituting 20% for 10% in each of those conditions in
accordance with Rule 11.01(b)(1) of SEC
Regulation S-X.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues and other
|
|
$
|
2,673
|
|
|
$
|
1,634
|
|
|
$
|
8,615
|
|
|
$
|
12,390
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,309
|
|
|
$
|
7,584
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to common stock(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
705
|
|
|
$
|
(1,758
|
)
|
|
$
|
(292
|
)
|
|
$
|
706
|
|
|
$
|
2,807
|
|
|
$
|
2,547
|
|
|
$
|
2,618
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
$
|
(5.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.11
|
|
|
$
|
8.45
|
|
|
$
|
7.72
|
|
|
$
|
7.96
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
(5.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
$
|
8.39
|
|
|
$
|
7.64
|
|
|
$
|
7.84
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
29,228
|
|
|
$
|
26,293
|
|
|
$
|
28,186
|
|
|
$
|
29,186
|
|
|
$
|
28,635
|
|
|
$
|
24,308
|
|
|
$
|
19,272
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
$
|
4,912
|
|
|
$
|
5,068
|
|
|
$
|
4,922
|
|
|
$
|
4,227
|
|
|
$
|
3,822
|
|
|
$
|
2,192
|
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (MBbls)
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
Natural gas liquids (MBbls)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
MBoe
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
Average realized price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil per Bbl
|
|
$
|
74.55
|
|
|
|
42.49
|
|
|
$
|
59.85
|
|
|
$
|
87.80
|
|
|
$
|
68.84
|
|
|
$
|
59.92
|
|
|
$
|
51.66
|
|
Natural gas per Mcf
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
$
|
3.69
|
|
|
$
|
6.70
|
|
|
$
|
5.34
|
|
|
$
|
5.17
|
|
|
$
|
6.35
|
|
Natural gas liquids per Bbl
|
|
$
|
45.45
|
|
|
|
21.29
|
|
|
$
|
27.63
|
|
|
$
|
51.38
|
|
|
$
|
42.78
|
|
|
$
|
37.70
|
|
|
$
|
32.13
|
|
Proved reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil & natural gas liquids (MBbls)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1,067,248
|
|
|
|
1,081,144
|
|
|
|
1,133,710
|
|
|
|
1,061,041
|
|
|
|
975,910
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
7,796,031
|
|
|
|
7,917,025
|
|
|
|
7,872,717
|
|
|
|
7,512,919
|
|
|
|
6,848,022
|
|
MBoe
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2,366,586
|
|
|
|
2,400,648
|
|
|
|
2,445,829
|
|
|
|
2,313,194
|
|
|
|
2,117,248
|
|
21
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loss attributable to common stock and net loss per common share
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and the year
ended December 31, 2009 include a $2.82 billion
($1.98 billion net of tax) write-down of the carrying value
of Apaches March 31, 2009 proved property balances in
the U.S. and Canada. |
|
(2) |
|
Income attributable to common stock and net income per common
share for the year ended December 31, 2008 include a
$5.3 billion ($3.6 billion net of tax) write-down of
the carrying value of Apaches December 31, 2008
proved property balances in the U.S., the U.K. North Sea, Canada
and Argentina. |
22
SELECTED
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL, OPERATING AND RESERVE DATA OF
MARINER
The following table presents selected historical consolidated
financial, operating and reserve data of Mariner. The financial
data as of, and for the years ended, December 31, 2009,
2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are derived from Mariners
audited consolidated financial statements for those periods. The
financial data as of, and for the quarterly periods ended,
March 31, 2010 and 2009 are derived from Mariners
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for those
periods. Mariners management believes that the
companys interim unaudited financial statements have been
prepared on a basis consistent with its audited financial
statements and include all normal and recurring adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of the results for each
interim period.
The reserve data set forth below includes information with
respect to Mariners estimated proved reserves based on
estimates made in reserve reports prepared by Ryder Scott
Company, L.P.
The information in the following table is only a summary and is
not indicative of the results of future operations of Mariner.
You should read the following information together with
Mariners Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, Mariners
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the other
information that Mariner has filed with the SEC and incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. See
Where You Can Find More Information; Incorporation by
Reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues(1)
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
943
|
|
|
$
|
1,301
|
|
|
$
|
875
|
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc.(2)(3)(4)
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(424
|
)
|
|
$
|
(319
|
)
|
|
$
|
(389
|
)
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
(4.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.34
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
(4.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.34
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.58
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total assets(5)
|
|
$
|
3,002
|
|
|
$
|
2,820
|
|
|
$
|
2,867
|
|
|
$
|
3,393
|
|
|
$
|
3,084
|
|
|
$
|
2,680
|
|
|
$
|
666
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
1,222
|
|
|
$
|
1,240
|
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
$
|
1,170
|
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
|
$
|
654
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (MBbls)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Natural gas liquids (MBbls)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBoe
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Average realized price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil per Bbl
|
|
$
|
72.31
|
|
|
$
|
62.81
|
|
|
$
|
70.59
|
|
|
$
|
86.02
|
|
|
$
|
67.50
|
|
|
$
|
62.63
|
|
|
$
|
41.23
|
|
Natural gas per Mcf
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
6.95
|
|
|
$
|
6.08
|
|
|
$
|
9.31
|
|
|
$
|
7.88
|
|
|
$
|
7.37
|
|
|
$
|
6.66
|
|
Natural gas liquids per Bbl
|
|
$
|
48.08
|
|
|
$
|
23.70
|
|
|
$
|
33.10
|
|
|
$
|
55.02
|
|
|
$
|
45.16
|
|
|
$
|
48.37
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proved reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil & natural gas liquids (MBbls)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
85,950
|
|
|
|
69,304
|
|
|
|
64,563
|
|
|
|
48,136
|
|
|
|
21,647
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
571,435
|
|
|
|
558,048
|
|
|
|
448,439
|
|
|
|
426,687
|
|
|
|
207,686
|
|
MBoe
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
181,189
|
|
|
|
162,312
|
|
|
|
139,303
|
|
|
|
119,251
|
|
|
|
56,261
|
|
23
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008
includes a $16.6 million arbitration award related to a
consummated acquisition. Total revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2008 includes the release of
$46.5 million in suspended revenue related to a potential
MMS royalty dispute. |
|
(2) |
|
Net loss attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. and net loss per
common share for the year ended December 31, 2009 include a
$754.3 million ($486.5 million net of tax) write-down
of the carrying value of Mariners proved property balances
and a $107.3 million gain on the acquisition of the
reorganized subsidiaries and operations of Edge Petroleum
Corporation. The loss also included $12.0 million recorded
to lease operating expense for contingent OIL insurance premiums. |
|
(3) |
|
Net loss attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. and net loss per
common share for the three months ended March 31, 2009
include a $704.7 million ($454.6 million, net of tax)
write-down of the carrying value of Mariners proved
property balances. |
|
(4) |
|
Net loss attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. and net loss per
common share for the year ended December 31, 2008 include a
$575.6 million ($369.1 million, net of tax) write-down
of the carrying value of Mariners proved property
balances, a $295.6 million impairment of Mariners
goodwill and a $15.3 million ($9.8 million, net of
tax) impairment of other property. The loss also included
$36.0 million recorded to lease operating expense for a
contingent OIL insurance premium. |
|
(5) |
|
Total assets at December 31, 2009 include
$237.5 million from the acquisition of the reorganized
subsidiaries and operations of Edge Petroleum Corporation. |
24
UNAUDITED
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE INFORMATION
The following table sets forth selected historical and unaudited
pro forma combined per share information of Apache and Mariner.
Pro Forma Combined Per Share Information of
Apache. The unaudited pro forma combined per
share information of Apache below gives effect to the merger
under the acquisition method of accounting, as if the merger had
been effective on January 1, 2009, in the case of net
income per share and cash dividends per share data, and
March 31, 2010, in the case of book value per share data,
and assuming that 0.17043 of a share of Apache common stock had
been issued in exchange for each outstanding share of Mariner
common stock. The unaudited pro forma combined per share
information of Apache is derived from the audited financial
statements as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2009
and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as
of, and for the three months ended, March 31, 2010 for
Apache and Mariner.
The accounting for an acquisition of a business is based on the
authoritative guidance for business combinations. Acquisition
accounting requires, among other things, that most assets
acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair
values as of the acquisition date. Acquisition accounting is
dependent upon certain valuations of Mariners assets and
liabilities and other studies that have yet to commence or
progress to a stage where there is sufficient information for a
definitive measurement. Accordingly, the pro forma adjustments
reflect the assets and liabilities of Mariner at their
preliminary estimated fair values. Differences between these
preliminary estimates and the final acquisition accounting will
occur and these differences could have a material impact on the
unaudited pro forma combined per share information set forth in
the following table.
The unaudited pro forma combined per share information of Apache
does not purport to represent the actual results of operations
that Apache would have achieved had the companies been combined
during these periods or to project the future results of
operations that Apache may achieve after the merger.
Historical Per Share Information of Apache and
Mariner. The historical per share information of
each of Apache and Mariner below is derived from the audited
financial statements as of, and for the year ended,
December 31, 2009 and the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements as of, and for the three months ended,
March 31, 2010 for each such company.
Equivalent Pro Forma Combined Per Share
Information. The unaudited equivalent pro forma
combined per share amounts below are calculated by multiplying
the unaudited pro forma combined per share amounts of Apache by
the exchange ratio for the mixed consideration of 0.17043. This
computation does not include the benefit to Mariner stockholders
of the cash component of the transaction.
Generally. You should read the below
information in conjunction with the selected historical
financial information included elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus and the historical financial statements of
Apache and Mariner and related notes that are incorporated into
this proxy statement/prospectus by reference. See Selected
Historical Financial, Operating and Reserve Data of
Apache, Selected Historical Financial, Operating and
Reserve Data of Mariner and Where You Can Find More
Information; Incorporation By Reference.
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Apache historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
(0.87
|
)
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
Book value per share at period end(2)
|
|
|
49.71
|
|
|
|
46.90
|
|
Apache pro forma combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
|
$
|
(1.71
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
(1.71
|
)
|
Cash dividends per common share(1)
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
Book value per share at period end(2)
|
|
|
51.54
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Mariner historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
(3.34
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
(3.34
|
)
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share at period end(2)
|
|
|
9.13
|
|
|
|
8.67
|
|
Pro forma (equivalent)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Book value per share at period end(2)
|
|
|
8.78
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Same as Apaches historical, since no change in dividend
policy is expected as a result of the merger. |
|
(2) |
|
Historical book value per share is calculated by dividing
stockholders equity by the number of Apache or Mariner
common shares outstanding at the end of the period. Pro forma
book value per share is computed by dividing pro forma
stockholders equity by the pro forma number of Apache
common shares outstanding at the end of the period. Book value
per share is required to be presented on a pro forma basis only
for the most recent balance sheet date
March 31, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts are calculated by multiplying the Apache pro forma
combined per share amounts by the exchange ratio of 0.17043. |
26
COMPARATIVE
APACHE AND MARINER MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND DATA
Apache common stock is listed on the NYSE, the Chicago Stock
Exchange and the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol
APA. Mariner common stock is listed on the NYSE
under the symbol ME.
The following table presents closing prices per share of Apache
common stock and Mariner common stock as reported on the NYSE as
of April 14, 2010, the last full trading day before the
public announcement of the execution of the merger agreement by
Apache and Mariner, and as of [], 2010, the most recent
practicable trading day prior to the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus. This table also presents the implied value
of the mixed consideration per share of Mariner common stock on
each of the specified dates, as determined by multiplying the
closing prices of shares of Apache common stock on those dates
by 0.17043, plus $7.80 in cash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apache
|
|
Mariner
|
|
Equivalent per
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Share Value
|
|
April 14, 2010
|
|
$
|
108.06
|
|
|
$
|
18.09
|
|
|
$
|
26.22
|
|
[], 2010
|
|
$
|
[]
|
|
|
$
|
[]
|
|
|
$
|
[]
|
|
The market prices of shares of Apache common stock and Mariner
common stock will fluctuate between the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus and the completion of the merger, and thus
no assurance can be given concerning the market prices of shares
of Apache common stock or Mariner common stock before the
completion of the merger or shares of Apache common stock after
the completion of the merger. The market value of the merger
consideration ultimately received by Mariner stockholders will
depend on the closing price of Apache common stock on the day
the merger is consummated. Mariner stockholders are
encouraged to obtain current market quotations for Apache common
stock and Mariner common stock in deciding whether to vote for
the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and in
electing the form of consideration they wish to receive. See
Risk Factors Risks Relating to the
Merger As a result of the consideration election and
proration provisions of the merger agreement, and because the
market price of Apache common stock will fluctuate, Mariner
stockholders cannot be sure of the aggregate value of the merger
consideration they will receive.
As of [], 2010, there were approximately
[] record holders of Apache common stock and
approximately [] record holders of Mariner common stock.
Historical
Market Prices
The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters
indicated, the
intra-day
high and low sale prices per share of Apache common stock and
per share of Mariner common stock as reported on the NYSE. The
table also shows the amount of cash dividends declared per share
of Apache common stock and Mariner common stock for the calendar
quarters indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apache
|
|
Mariner
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Declared
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Declared
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter (through [], 2010)
|
|
$
|
[]
|
|
|
$
|
[]
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
$
|
[]
|
|
|
$
|
[]
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
111.00
|
|
|
$
|
83.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
26.32
|
|
|
$
|
15.13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
108.92
|
|
|
$
|
95.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
16.27
|
|
|
$
|
11.84
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
106.46
|
|
|
$
|
88.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
16.66
|
|
|
$
|
11.35
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
95.77
|
|
|
$
|
65.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
15.41
|
|
|
$
|
9.65
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
87.04
|
|
|
$
|
61.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
15.74
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
88.07
|
|
|
$
|
51.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
12.84
|
|
|
$
|
6.46
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apache
|
|
Mariner
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Declared
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Declared
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
103.17
|
|
|
$
|
57.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
20.46
|
|
|
$
|
6.86
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
145.00
|
|
|
$
|
94.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
37.25
|
|
|
$
|
19.20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
149.23
|
|
|
$
|
117.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
37.38
|
|
|
$
|
26.60
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
First Quarter(2)
|
|
$
|
122.34
|
|
|
$
|
84.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
30.06
|
|
|
$
|
22.80
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
109.32
|
|
|
$
|
87.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
$
|
19.78
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
91.25
|
|
|
$
|
72.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
25.43
|
|
|
$
|
17.82
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
87.82
|
|
|
$
|
70.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
25.87
|
|
|
$
|
19.20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
73.44
|
|
|
$
|
63.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
20.55
|
|
|
$
|
16.88
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
70.50
|
|
|
$
|
59.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
21.36
|
|
|
$
|
17.68
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
72.40
|
|
|
$
|
59.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
19.68
|
|
|
$
|
15.94
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
75.66
|
|
|
$
|
56.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
20.65
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
First Quarter(3)
|
|
$
|
76.25
|
|
|
$
|
63.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
21.00
|
|
|
$
|
18.05
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A dividend with respect to the third quarter of 2010 has not yet
been declared or paid. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Apaches first quarter 2008 dividends declared included a
special non-recurring cash dividend of 10 cents per common share
declared and paid in the first quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Mariner common stock commenced regular way trading on
March 3, 2006 on the NYSE. |
Dividends
Apache has paid cash dividends on its common stock for 45
consecutive years through December 31, 2009. On
February 22, 2010 and May 21, 2010, Apache paid
dividends of $0.15 per share on its common stock. In addition,
on May 6, 2010, Apaches board of directors declared a
dividend of $0.15 per share on Apaches common stock that
will be paid on August 23, 2010 to stockholders of record
on July 22, 2010. After the merger is completed, former
Mariner stockholders will be entitled to receive any dividends
declared by Apaches board of directors with a record date
after the effective time of the merger on any shares of Apache
common stock they receive pursuant to the merger. When and if
declared by Apaches board of directors, future dividend
payments will depend upon Apaches level of earnings,
financial requirements and other relevant factors.
Mariner historically has retained its earnings for the
development of its business, and accordingly has not paid
dividends since it commenced regular way trading on
March 3, 2006 on the NYSE. Mariners existing bank
credit facility and indentures governing its senior unsecured
notes contain certain covenants that restrict Mariners
ability to pay dividends.
28
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information contained or
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus,
including the matters addressed in Cautionary Statement
Concerning Forward-Looking Statements, you should
carefully consider the following risk factors in determining
whether to vote for the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement. You should also read and consider the risk factors
associated with each of the businesses of Apache and Mariner
because these risk factors may affect the operations and
financial results of the combined company. These risk factors
may be found under Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors in each companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Part II,
Item 1A Risk Factors in each companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, each of which is on
file with the SEC and all of which are incorporated by reference
into this proxy statement/prospectus.
Risks
Relating to the Merger
Mariner
stockholders electing to receive only cash or only Apache common
stock may, as the result of proration, receive a form or
combination of consideration different from the form they
elect.
While each Mariner stockholder may elect to receive
consideration consisting of all cash, all shares of Apache
common stock or a combination of both in exchange for their
shares of Mariner common stock, the aggregate cash consideration
to be received by Mariner stockholders pursuant to the merger
will be fixed at an amount equal to the product of $7.80 and the
number of shares of Mariner common stock outstanding immediately
prior to the closing of the merger less 714,887 shares of
outstanding unvested restricted stock that will be cancelled
upon the merger. Such cash amount is expected to be
approximately $800 million. Similarly, the aggregate number
of shares of Apache common stock to be received by Mariner
stockholders pursuant to the merger will be fixed at a number
equal to the product of 0.17043 and the number of shares of
Mariner common stock outstanding immediately prior to closing of
the merger less 714,887 shares of outstanding unvested
restricted stock that will be cancelled upon the merger, which
number is expected to be approximately 17.5 million shares
of Apache common stock. Accordingly, if Mariner stockholders
elect, in the aggregate, to receive cash in an amount greater
than the aggregate cash consideration payable under the merger
agreement, then those holders electing to receive all cash
consideration will be prorated down and will receive Apache
common stock as a portion of the overall consideration they
receive for their shares. On the other hand, if Mariner
stockholders elect, in the aggregate, to receive stock in an
amount greater than the aggregate number of shares issuable
under the merger agreement, then those holders electing to
receive all stock consideration will be prorated down and will
receive cash as a portion of the overall consideration they
receive for their shares. As a result, Mariner stockholders that
make a valid election to receive all cash or all stock
consideration may not receive merger consideration entirely in
the form elected.
As a
result of the consideration election and proration provisions of
the merger agreement, and because the market price of Apache
common stock will fluctuate, Mariner stockholders cannot be sure
of the aggregate value of the merger consideration they will
receive.
The total number of shares of Apache common stock that will be
issued to Mariner stockholders pursuant to the merger is fixed.
Accordingly, the value of the merger consideration payable in
Apache common stock will depend on the trading price of Apache
common stock for those Mariner stockholders electing or, through
the proration mechanism contained in the merger agreement,
becoming entitled to receive Apache common stock pursuant to the
merger. This means that there is no price protection
mechanism contained in the merger agreement that would adjust
the number of Apache shares that Mariner stockholders will
receive based on any increases or decreases in the trading price
of Apache common stock prior to the closing of the merger. If
Apaches stock price decreases, the market value of the
consideration to be received will also decrease for those
Mariner stockholders electing or, through the proration
mechanism, becoming entitled to receive Apache common stock. If
Apaches stock price increases, the market value of the
consideration to be received will likewise increase for those
Mariner stockholders electing or becoming entitled to receive
Apache common stock. The value of the merger consideration you
receive in Apache common shares, if any, will vary from the date
of the announcement of the merger agreement, the date that this
proxy statement/prospectus was mailed to Mariner stockholders,
the election deadline, the date of the Mariner special meeting
and the date the merger
29
is completed and thereafter. Accordingly, at the election
deadline and at the time of the Mariner special meeting, you
will not know or be able to determine the value of the Apache
common stock you will receive upon completion of the merger.
Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors,
including, among others, general market and economic conditions,
changes in oil and natural gas prices, changes in Apaches
and Mariners respective businesses, operations and
prospects, regulatory considerations, market assessments of the
likelihood that the merger will be completed and the timing of
the merger. Many of these factors are beyond Apaches and
Mariners control.
If you
tender shares of Mariner common stock to make an election, you
will not be able to sell those shares unless you revoke your
election prior to the election deadline.
If you are a Mariner stockholder and want to make a mixed, cash
or stock consideration election under the merger agreement, you
must deliver your stock certificates, if any (or follow the
procedures for guaranteed delivery), and a properly completed
and signed election form to the exchange agent. The deadline for
doing this is 5:00 p.m., New York time, on [], 2010.
You will not be able to sell any shares of Mariner common stock
that you have delivered under this arrangement unless you revoke
your election before the deadline by providing written notice to
the exchange agent. If you do not revoke your election, you will
not be able to liquidate your investment in Mariner common stock
for any reason until you receive cash
and/or
Apache common stock pursuant to the merger. In the time between
delivery of your shares and the closing of the merger, the
market price of Mariner or Apache common stock may increase or
decrease and you might otherwise want to sell your shares of
Mariner to gain access to cash, make other investments or reduce
the potential for a decrease in the value of your investment.
The
date that Mariner stockholders will receive their merger
consideration is uncertain.
The completion of the merger is subject to the stockholder and
governmental approvals described in this proxy
statement/prospectus and the satisfaction or waiver of certain
other conditions. While we currently expect to complete the
merger promptly following the Mariner special meeting of
stockholders (assuming the merger is approved and adopted at the
meeting), the completion date might be later than expected due
to delays in satisfying such conditions. Accordingly, we cannot
provide Mariner stockholders with a definitive date on which
they will receive the merger consideration.
Mariner
stockholders will have a significantly reduced ownership and
voting interest after the merger and will exercise less
influence over management.
Immediately after the completion of the merger, it is expected
that former Mariner stockholders, who collectively own
100 percent of Mariner, will own approximately
5 percent of Apache, based on the number of shares of
Mariner and Apache common stock outstanding as of July 28,
2010. Consequently, Mariner stockholders will have less
influence over the management and policies of Apache than they
currently have over the management and policies of Mariner.
The
market price of Apache common stock after the merger may be
affected by factors different from those affecting shares of
Mariner common stock currently.
Holders of Mariner common stock may receive Apache common stock
in the merger. The business of Apache differs from that of
Mariner in important respects and, accordingly, the results of
operations of Apache after the merger, as well as the market
price of its common stock, may be affected by factors different
from those currently affecting the results of operations of
Mariner as an independent company and the price of Mariner
common stock. For further information on the businesses of
Apache and Mariner and certain factors to consider in connection
with those businesses, including risk factors associated with
their businesses, see Apaches Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and its
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and Mariners
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and its
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, which are
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
See also the other documents incorporated by reference into
30
this proxy statement/prospectus under the caption Where
You Can Find More Information; Incorporation by Reference.
Mariners
directors and executive officers have interests in the merger
that may be different from, and in addition to, the interests of
other Mariner stockholders.
When considering the recommendation of Mariners board of
directors that Mariner stockholders vote in favor of the
approval and adoption of the merger agreement, you should be
aware that the executive officers and directors of Mariner are
parties to agreements or participants in other arrangements that
provide them with interests in the merger that are different
from, or in addition to, your interests as a stockholder of
Mariner. These different interests could create conflicts of
interest in their determinations to recommend the merger. In
particular, the executive officers of Mariner hold unvested
shares of Mariner restricted stock (including Performance-Based
Restricted Stock) that will vest pursuant to the terms of the
merger agreement and are parties to employment agreements, which
will survive the merger, that provide for severance and change
of control benefits. The completion of the merger will be
considered a change of control under these
agreements. In addition, the receipt of compensation and other
benefits by certain Mariners employees in connection with
the merger may make it more difficult for Apache to retain their
services after the merger, or require Apache to expend
additional sums of money to do so.
Mariners board of directors was aware of these interests
and considered them, among other matters, when adopting a
resolution to approve the merger agreement and recommending that
Mariner stockholders vote to approve and adopt the merger
agreement. You should consider these interests in voting on the
merger. We have further described these different interests
under The Merger Interests of the Mariner
Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.
The
merger agreement contains provisions that limit Mariners
ability to pursue alternatives to the merger with Apache, could
discourage a potential competing acquirer of Mariner from making
a favorable alternative transaction proposal and, in certain
circumstances, could require Mariner to pay a $67 million
termination fee to Apache.
Unless and until the merger agreement is terminated, subject to
limited fiduciary exceptions (which are discussed in more detail
in The Merger Agreement Certain Additional
Agreements), Mariner is restricted from initiating,
soliciting, knowingly encouraging, knowingly facilitating,
discussing or negotiating any inquiry, proposal or offer for a
competing acquisition proposal with any person. Additionally,
under the merger agreement, in the event of a potential change
by the Mariner board of directors of its recommendation with
respect to the merger, Mariner must provide Apache with three
business days to propose an adjustment to the terms and
conditions of the merger agreement. Mariner may terminate the
merger agreement and enter into an agreement with respect to a
superior proposal only if specified conditions have been
satisfied, including compliance with the no solicitation
provisions of the merger agreement. Additionally, Mariner may be
required to pay to Apache a termination fee of $67 million
(less the amount of any of Apaches expenses reimbursed by
Mariner pursuant to the merger agreement) if the merger
agreement is terminated under certain circumstances. These
provisions could discourage a third party that may have an
interest in acquiring all or a significant part of Mariner from
considering or proposing that acquisition. In connection with
the settlement of two stockholder lawsuits, on August 2,
2010, Apache and Mariner amended the merger agreement to
eliminate the termination fee in the event that Mariner
terminates the merger agreement in order to enter into a
superior proposal with another party. See The
Merger Litigation Relating to the Merger.
The
rights of Mariner stockholders will be governed by Apaches
restated certificate of incorporation and amended
bylaws.
All Mariner stockholders who receive shares of Apache common
stock in the merger will become Apache stockholders and their
rights as stockholders will be governed by Apaches
restated certificate of incorporation and its amended bylaws.
There are material differences between the current rights of
Mariner stockholders, which are governed by Mariners
second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
fourth amended
31
and restated bylaws, and the rights of holders of Apache common
stock. See Comparison of Rights of Apache Stockholders and
Mariner Stockholders.
Apache
may have difficulty combining the operations of both Mariner and
the BP Properties, and the anticipated benefits of these
transactions may not be achieved.
Achieving the anticipated benefits of the merger and BP
transactions will depend in part upon whether Apache can
successfully integrate the operations of Mariner and the BP
Properties. Apaches ability to integrate the operations of
Mariner and the BP Properties successfully will depend on
Apaches ability to monitor operations, coordinate
exploration and development activities, control costs, attract,
retain and assimilate qualified personnel and maintain
compliance with regulatory requirements. The difficulties of
integrating the operations of Mariner and the BP Properties may
be increased by the necessity of combining organizations with
distinct cultures and widely dispersed operations. The
integration of operations following these transactions will
require the dedication of management and other personnel, which
may distract their attention from the
day-to-day
business of the combined enterprise and prevent Apache from
realizing benefits from other opportunities. Completing the
integration process may be more expensive than anticipated, and
Apache cannot assure you that it will be able to effect the
integration of these operations smoothly or efficiently or that
the anticipated benefits of the transactions will be achieved.
Any
delay in completing the merger may substantially reduce the
benefits expected to be obtained from the merger.
The merger is subject to a number of other conditions beyond the
control of Mariner and Apache that may prevent, delay or
otherwise materially adversely affect its completion. See
The Merger Agreement Conditions to the
Merger. Apache and Mariner cannot predict whether or when
the conditions required to complete the merger will be
satisfied. The requirements for obtaining the required
clearances and approvals could delay the effective time of the
merger for a significant period of time or prevent it from
occurring. Any delay in completing the merger may materially
adversely affect the synergies and other benefits that Apache
and Mariner expect to achieve if the merger and the integration
of their respective businesses are completed within the expected
timeframe.
Mariner
may have difficulty attracting, motivating and retaining
executives and other key employees in light of the
merger.
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on Mariner employees
may have an adverse effect on Mariner and consequently Apache.
This uncertainty may impair Mariners ability to attract,
retain and motivate key personnel until the merger is completed.
Employee retention may be particularly challenging during the
pendency of the merger, as employees may experience uncertainty
about their future roles with Apache. If key employees of
Mariner depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and
difficulty of integration or a desire not to become employees of
Apache, Apaches ability to realize the anticipated
benefits of the merger could be delayed or reduced.
Failure
to complete the merger could negatively impact the stock price
and the future business and financial results of
Mariner.
If the merger is not completed, the ongoing business of Mariner
may be adversely affected and Mariner would be subject to a
number of risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner will not realize the benefits expected from the merger,
including a potentially enhanced competitive and financial
position, and instead will be subject to all the risks it
currently faces as an independent company;
|
|
|
|
Mariner may experience negative reactions from the financial
markets and Mariners customers and employees;
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
under the merger agreement, Mariner may be required to pay to
Apache a termination fee of $67 million (less the amount of
any of Apaches expenses reimbursed by Mariner pursuant to
the merger agreement) if the merger agreement is terminated
under certain circumstances. If such a termination fee is
payable, the payment of this fee could have material and adverse
consequences to the financial condition and operations of
Mariner (see The Merger Agreement Termination,
Amendment and Waiver);
|
|
|
|
Mariner will be required to pay certain costs relating to the
merger, including certain investment banking, legal and
accounting fees and expenses, whether or not the merger is
completed;
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement places certain restrictions on the conduct
of Mariners business prior to the completion of the merger
or the termination of the merger agreement. Such restrictions,
the waiver of which is subject to the consent of Apache (not to
be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), may prevent
Mariner from making certain acquisitions, taking certain other
specified actions or otherwise pursuing business opportunities
during the pendency of the merger (see The Merger
Agreement Conduct of Business Pending the Effective
Time of the Merger for a description of the restrictive
covenants applicable to Mariner); and
|
|
|
|
matters relating to the merger (including integration planning)
may require substantial commitments of time and resources by
Mariner management, which would otherwise have been devoted to
other opportunities that may have been beneficial to Mariner as
an independent company.
|
There can be no assurance that the risks described above will
not materialize, and if any of them do, they may adversely
affect Mariners business, financial results and stock
price.
The
Devon and Mariner transactions will increase Apaches
exposure to Gulf of Mexico operations.
Apaches recent acquisition of oil and gas assets on the
Gulf of Mexico shelf from Devon Energy Corporation has increased
its exposure to Gulf of Mexico operations. Following the
completion of the merger, an even larger percentage of
Apaches exploration and production operations will be
related to offshore Gulf of Mexico properties. Greater offshore
concentration proportionately increases risks from delays or
higher costs common to offshore activity, including severe
weather, availability of specialized equipment and compliance
with environmental and other laws and regulations.
The
Mariner and BP transactions will expose Apache to additional
risks and uncertainties with respect to the acquired businesses
and their operations.
Although the acquired Mariner and BP businesses will generally
be subject to risks similar to those to which Apache are subject
in its existing businesses, the Mariner and BP transactions may
increase these risks. For example, the increase in the scale of
Apaches operations may increase its operational risks.
Recent publicity associated with the oil spill in the Gulf of
Mexico resulting from the fire and explosion onboard the
Deepwater Horizon, which was under contract to BP, may cause
regulatory agencies to scrutinize Apaches operations more
closely, as the acquiror of certain of BPs operations.
This additional scrutiny may adversely affect Apaches
operations.
The
market value of Apache common stock could decline if large
amounts of its common stock are sold following the
merger.
Following the merger, stockholders of Apache and former
stockholders of Mariner will own interests in a combined company
operating an expanded business with more assets and a different
mix of liabilities. Current stockholders of Apache and Mariner
may not wish to continue to invest in the additional operations
of the combined company, or may wish to reduce their investment
in the combined company, or for other reasons may wish to
dispose of some or all of their interests in the combined
company. If, following the merger, large amounts of Apache
common stock are sold, the price of its common stock could
decline.
33
The
merger will likely not be accretive, and may be dilutive, to
Apaches earnings per share, which may negatively affect
the market price of Apache common stock.
Apache anticipates that the merger will not be accretive, and
may be dilutive, to earnings per share for several quarters
following the merger. This expectation is based on preliminary
estimates that may materially change. In addition, future events
and conditions could decrease or delay any accretion, result in
dilution or cause greater dilution than is currently expected,
including adverse changes in energy market conditions; commodity
prices for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids; production
levels; reserve levels; operating results; competitive
conditions; laws and regulations affecting the energy business;
capital expenditure obligations; and general economic
conditions. Any dilution of, or decrease or delay of any
accretion to, Apaches earnings per share could cause the
price of Apaches common stock to decline.
Risks
Relating to Apache and Mariner
Apache and Mariner are, and following completion of the merger,
Apache and Mariner will continue to be, subject to the risks
described in (i) Part I, Item 1A in Apaches
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and Part II,
Item 1A of Apaches
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and
(ii) Part I, Item 1A in Mariners Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and Part II,
Item 1A of Mariners
10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, each of which is on file with
the SEC and all of which are incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information; Incorporation by Reference.
A
drilling moratorium in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, or other
regulatory initiatives in response to the current oil spill in
the Gulf of Mexico, could adversely affect Apaches and
Mariners business.
As has been widely reported, on April 20, 2010, a fire and
explosion occurred onboard the semisubmersible drilling rig
Deepwater Horizon, leading to the oil spill currently affecting
the Gulf of Mexico. In response to this incident, the Minerals
Management Service (now known as the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and Enforcement, or BOE) of
the U.S. Department of the Interior issued a notice on
May 30, 2010 implementing a six-month moratorium on certain
drilling activities in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
Implementation of the moratorium was blocked by a
U.S. district court, which was subsequently affirmed on
appeal, but on July 12, 2010, the BOE issued a new
moratorium that applies to drilling operations that use subsea
blowout preventers or surface blowout preventers on floating
facilities. The new moratorium will last until November 30,
2010, or until such earlier time that the BOE determines that
deepwater drilling operations can proceed safely. The BOE is
also expected to issue new safety and environmental guidelines
or regulations for drilling in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, and
potentially in other geographic regions, and may take other
steps that could increase the costs of exploration and
production, reduce the area of operations and result in
permitting delays. This incident could also result in drilling
suspensions or other regulatory initiatives in other areas of
the U.S. and abroad. Although it is difficult to predict
the ultimate impact of the moratorium or any new guidelines,
regulations or legislation, a prolonged suspension of drilling
activity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and other areas, new
regulations and increased liability for companies operating in
this sector could adversely affect Apaches and
Mariners operations in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico as
well as in other offshore locations.
Our
operations involve a high degree of operational risk,
particularly risk of personal injury, damage or loss of
equipment and environmental accidents.
Our operations are subject to hazards and risks inherent in the
drilling, production and transportation of crude oil and natural
gas, including:
|
|
|
|
|
drilling well blowouts, explosions and cratering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
pipeline ruptures and spills;
|
|
|
|
|
|
formations with abnormal pressures;
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
equipment malfunctions; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
hurricanes, which could affect our operations in areas such as
the Gulf Coast and deepwater Gulf of Mexico, and other natural
disasters.
|
Failure or loss of equipment, as the result of equipment
malfunctions or natural disasters such as hurricanes, could
result in property damages, personal injury, environmental
pollution and other damages for which we could be liable.
Litigation arising from a catastrophic occurrence, such as a
well blowout, explosion or fire at a location where our
equipment and services are used, may result in substantial
claims for damages. Ineffective containment of a well blowout or
pipeline rupture could result in environmental pollution and
substantial remediation expenses. If a significant amount of our
production is interrupted, our containment efforts prove to be
ineffective or litigation arises as the result of a catastrophic
occurrence, our cash flow and, in turn, our results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Several
significant matters in the BP Acquisition will not be resolved
by Apache before closing.
Because of the relatively short time period between signing the
BP Purchase Agreements and the expected closing of the BP
Acquisition, several significant matters commonly resolved prior
to closing such an acquisition have been reserved for after
closing. For example, title review with respect to most of the
BP Properties will not be completed by Apache until after
closing. In addition, Apache will not have sufficient time
before closing to conduct a full assessment of any environmental
and legal liabilities with respect to the BP Properties. As a
result, Apache may discover title defects or adverse
environmental or other conditions after Apache has closed the BP
Acquisition and after expiration of the time periods specified
in the BP Purchase Agreements during which Apache may be able to
seek, in certain cases, indemnification from or cure of the
defect or adverse conditions by BP for such matters. In
addition, not all environmental or other conditions that may be
identified will be the subject of contractual remedies, and
Apache cannot assure you that its contractual remedies will be
adequate for any liabilities it incurs.
The
reserves, production, revenue and direct operating expense
estimates with respect to the BP Properties may differ
materially from the actual amounts.
The reserves and production estimates with respect to the BP
Properties mentioned in this proxy statement/prospectus are
based on Apaches analysis of historical production data,
assumptions regarding capital expenditures and anticipated
production declines. These estimates of reserves and production
are based on estimates of Apaches engineers without review
by an independent petroleum engineering firm. Data used to make
these estimates were furnished by BP or obtained from publicly
available sources. Apache cannot assure you that these estimates
of proved reserves and production are accurate. After such data
is reviewed by an independent petroleum engineering firm, the BP
Acquisition reserves and production may differ materially from
the amounts indicated in this proxy statement/prospectus.
In addition, the preliminary revenue and direct operating
expense estimates with respect to the BP Properties were
provided by BP, are unaudited, and have not been reviewed by
Apaches independent accountants. Apache cannot assure you
that these preliminary estimates are accurate, and when Apache
files separate financial statements and pro forma financial
information following consummation of the BP Acquisition, such
amounts may differ materially from the amounts indicated in this
proxy statement/prospectus.
The BP
Acquisition and/or Apaches liabilities could be adversely
affected in the event one or more of the BP entities become the
subject of a bankruptcy case.
In light of the extensive costs and liabilities related to the
current oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, there has been public
speculation as to whether one or more of the BP entities will
become the subject of a case or proceeding under Title 11
of the United States Code or any other relevant insolvency law
or similar law, which we collectively refer to as Insolvency
Laws. In the event that one or more of the BP entities were to
become the subject of such a case or proceeding, a court may
find that the BP Purchase Agreements are executory contracts, in
which case such BP entities may, subject to relevant Insolvency
Laws, have the right to reject the
35
agreements and refuse to perform their future obligations under
them. In this event, Apaches ability to enforce its rights
under the BP Purchase Agreements could be adversely affected.
Furthermore, if any of the BP entities were to become the
subject of such a case or proceeding, and Apache were unable to
consummate the BP Acquisition, Apache may not be able to collect
all or a portion of the full $5.0 billion Apache has
deposited with BP pending completion of the acquisition.
Additionally, in a case or proceeding under relevant Insolvency
Laws, a court may find that the sale of the BP Properties
constitutes a constructive fraudulent conveyance that should be
set aside. While the tests for determining whether a transfer of
assets constitutes a constructive fraudulent conveyance vary
among jurisdictions, such a determination generally requires
that the seller received less than a reasonably equivalent value
in exchange for such transfer or obligation and the seller was
insolvent at the time of the transaction, or was rendered
insolvent or left with unreasonably small capital to meet its
anticipated business needs as a result of the transaction. The
applicable time periods for such a finding also vary among
jurisdictions, but generally range from two to six years. If a
court were to make such determination in a proceeding under
relevant Insolvency Laws, Apaches rights under the BP
Purchase Agreements, and its rights to the BP Properties, could
be adversely affected.
Apache
will incur significant transaction and BP Acquisition-related
costs in connection with the financing of the BP Acquisition,
and may be unable to complete alternative financing before
closing of the BP Acquisition.
Apache expects to incur, until the closing of the BP
Acquisition, significant non-recurring costs associated with the
financing of the BP Acquisition, including obtaining and
maintaining the committed Bridge Facility that assures
Apaches ability to pay the consideration for the BP
Acquisition. In addition, Apache will be subject to numerous
market risks in connection with its plan to raise alternative
financing to fund the purchase price of the BP Acquisition prior
to closing, including risks related to general economic
conditions and changes in the costs of capital. In the event
less than all of the BP Acquisition purchase price, or
applicable portions thereof, is available to Apache when due and
payable, Apache will be required to draw under the Bridge
Facility in order to complete the BP Acquisition, and the costs
to do so may be significant.
The
failure to complete the BP Acquisition could adversely affect
the market price of Apaches common stock and otherwise
have an adverse effect on Apache.
There are a number of conditions to the completion of the BP
Acquisition contained in the BP Purchase Agreements that must be
satisfied for the transactions to close, and there can be no
assurance that the conditions will be satisfied. If Apache does
not complete the acquisition under one or more of the BP
Purchase Agreements, the market price of Apaches common
stock will likely fall to the extent that the market price
reflects an expectation that all of the transactions will be
completed. Further, a failed transaction may result in negative
publicity
and/or
negative impression of Apache in the investment community and
may affect its relationships with creditors and other business
partners.
If the BP Acquisition is not completed, Apache also must pay
costs related to the BP Acquisition including, among others,
legal, accounting and financial advisory, as well as certain
fees and expenses with respect to the committed Bridge Facility
whether the BP Acquisition is completed or not. Apache also
could be subject to litigation related to the failure to
complete the BP Acquisition or other factors, which may
adversely affect its business, financial results and stock
price. In addition, if the BP Acquisition is not completed,
Apache intends to use the net proceeds received in connection
with its offerings of common stock and depositary shares and the
subsequent debt financing Apache expects to undertake for
general corporate purposes. However, Apache would be subject to
significant earnings per share dilution and significantly
increased leverage as a result.
The
trading price of Apaches common stock may be subject to
significant fluctuations and volatility.
The market price of Apaches common stock could be subject
to significant fluctuations due to a change in sentiment in the
market regarding its operations or business prospects. Such
risks may be affected by the
36
factors described above and Cautionary Statements
Concerning Forward-Looking Statements as well as in the
documents incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/prospectus to which we have referred you.
Stock markets in general and Apaches common stock in
particular have experienced over the past two years, and
continue to experience, significant price and volume volatility.
As a result, the market price of Apaches common stock may
continue to be subject to similar market fluctuations that may
be unrelated to its operating performance or business prospects.
Increased volatility could result in a decline in the market
price of Apaches common stock.
Apaches
ability to declare and pay dividends is subject to
limitations.
The payment of future dividends on Apaches capital stock
is subject to the discretion of Apaches board of
directors, which considers, among other factors, its operating
results, overall financial condition, credit-risk considerations
and capital requirements, as well as general business and market
conditions. Apaches board of directors is not required to
declare dividends on its common stock and may decide not to
declare dividends.
The instrument governing Apaches revolving credit facility
limits, the Bridge Facility limits, and any indentures and other
financing agreements that Apache enters into in the future may
limit, Apaches ability to pay cash dividends on its
capital stock, including Apache common stock. In the event that
any of Apaches indentures or other financing agreements in
the future restrict Apaches ability to pay dividends in
cash on its common stock, Apache may be unable to pay dividends
in cash on its common stock unless Apache can refinance amounts
outstanding under those agreements.
In addition, under Delaware law, dividends on capital stock may
only be paid from surplus, which is defined as the
amount by which Apaches total assets exceeds the sum of
Apaches total liabilities, including contingent
liabilities, and the amount of Apaches capital; if there
is no surplus, cash dividends on capital stock may only be paid
from Apaches net profits for the then current
and/or the
preceding fiscal year. Further, even if Apache is permitted
under its contractual obligations and Delaware law to pay cash
dividends on its common stock, Apache may not have sufficient
cash to pay dividends in cash on its common stock.
Offerings
of debt by Apache, which would be senior to Apaches common
stock upon liquidation, and/or preferred equity securities,
which would be senior to Apache common stock for purposes of
dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect
the market price of Apaches common stock.
Upon liquidation, holders of Apaches debt securities and
lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive
distributions of Apaches available assets prior to the
holders of Apaches common stock.
Apaches board of directors is authorized to issue one or
more classes or series of preferred stock from time to time
without any action on the part of the stockholders.
Apaches board of directors also has the power, without
stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such classes or
series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting
rights, dividend rights, and preferences over Apaches
common stock with respect to dividends or upon Apaches
dissolution,
winding-up
and liquidation and other terms. If Apache issues preferred
stock in the future that has a preference over its common stock
with respect to the payment of dividends or upon its
liquidation, dissolution, or
winding-up,
or if Apache issues preferred stock with voting rights that
dilute the voting power of the mandatory convertible preferred
stock and its common stock, the rights of holders of Apache
common stock or the market price of Apaches common stock
could be adversely affected.
In addition, offerings of Apache common stock or of securities
linked to Apache common stock may dilute the holdings of
Apaches existing common stockholders or reduce the market
price of Apache common stock. Holders of Apache common stock are
not entitled to preemptive rights.
There
may be future sales or other dilution of Apaches equity,
which may adversely affect the market price of Apaches
common stock.
In connection with its offerings of common stock and depositary
shares, Apache agreed not to issue additional shares of common
stock or securities convertible into common stock, subject to
specified exceptions
37
including the issuance of shares in connection with the Mariner
transaction, for a period of 90 days ending
October 21, 2010. Additionally, Apaches directors and
executive officers have agreed not to sell or otherwise dispose
of any of their shares, subject to specified exceptions, for a
period of 90 days ending October 21, 2010.
Otherwise, Apache is not restricted from issuing additional
shares of common stock, including the common shares issuable
upon conversion of the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock.
The issuance of any additional shares of common or of preferred
stock or convertible securities or the exercise of such
securities could be substantially dilutive to holders of Apache
common stock. Holders of shares of Apache common stock are not
entitled to any preemptive rights by virtue of their status as
stockholders and that status does not entitle them to purchase
their pro rata share of any offering of shares of any class or
series and, therefore, such sales or offerings could result in
increased dilution to Apache stockholders.
The price of Apaches common stock may be adversely
affected by future sales of Apache common stock or securities
that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or of securities
that represent the right to receive, Apache common stock or
other dilution of Apaches equity, or by Apaches
announcement that such sales or other dilution may occur.
Contractual
and statutory provisions may delay or make more difficult
acquisitions or changes of control of Apache.
Provisions of Delaware law and Apaches Restated
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, and contracts to which
Apache are a party could make it more difficult for a third
party to acquire control of Apache or have the effect of
discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire control of
Apache.
Apaches
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock could restrict
Apaches ability to pay dividends on its common
stock.
The terms of Apaches Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock
could restrict Apaches ability to pay cash dividends on
its common stock. Apache may not declare or pay a dividend or
distribution on its common stock unless all accrued and unpaid
dividends for all past quarterly dividend periods on all
outstanding shares of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock have
been or are contemporaneously declared and paid in full or a
sufficient amount for such has been set aside.
38
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement/prospectus and the documents incorporated
by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus contain
statements that constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Representatives of
Apache and Mariner may also make forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are opinions, forecasts, projections,
future plans or other statements other than statements of
historical fact and are identified by terminology such as
expect, anticipate,
estimate, intend, may,
will, could, would,
should, predict, potential,
plan, project, likely,
believe or the negative of these terms or similar
terminology. Neither Mariner nor Apache can give any assurance
that such expectations will prove to be correct. Actual results
could differ materially as a result of a variety of risks and
uncertainties, including: the timing to consummate the proposed
agreement; the risk that a condition to closing the proposed
agreement may not be satisfied; the risk that a regulatory
approval that may be required for the proposed agreement is not
obtained or is obtained subject to conditions that are not
anticipated; negative effects from the pendency of the merger;
Apaches ability to achieve the synergies and value
creation contemplated by the proposed agreement; Apaches
ability to promptly and effectively integrate the merged
businesses; and the diversion of management time on
agreement-related issues.
These statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of
performance. Actual results may differ materially from those
expected, estimated or projected because of market conditions or
other factors. These statements are based upon the current
beliefs and expectations of management of Apache and Mariner and
are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual outcomes and results to be materially different from
those projected or anticipated. In addition to the risks
described under Risk Factors and those risks
described in documents that are incorporated by reference into
this proxy statement/prospectus, the following factors, among
others, could cause actual results to be materially different
from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking
statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner stockholder approval may not be obtained in a timely
manner, or at all;
|
|
|
|
the merger may not close due to the failure to satisfy any of
the closing conditions;
|
|
|
|
expected synergies and value creation from the merger may not be
realized;
|
|
|
|
key employees of Mariner may not be retained;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner and the BP Properties may not be integrated successfully;
|
|
|
|
|
|
management time may be diverted on merger-related matters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
regulatory approvals and third party consents required for the
consummation of the BP Acquisition by Apache may not be received
in a timely manner;
|
|
|
|
|
|
regulatory authorities may impose conditions on the future
operation of the BP Properties in connection with the receipt of
regulatory approvals by Apache;
|
|
|
|
|
|
preferential purchase rights may be exercised with respect to
certain of the BP Properties;
|
|
|
|
|
|
BP or its affiliates who are parties to or have guaranteed
obligations under the agreements related to the BP Acquisition
may become subject to a case or proceeding under the bankruptcy
or insolvency laws of any jurisdiction;
|
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the prices of crude oil, natural gas and natural
gas liquids;
|
|
|
|
the downgrade of Apaches or Mariners credit rating;
|
|
|
|
general economic, business or industry conditions;
|
|
|
|
credit risk of counterparties;
|
|
|
|
the expiration of leases on undeveloped acreage;
|
|
|
|
cash flow, liquidity and financial position;
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
pipeline and gathering system capacity constraints and various
transportation interruptions;
|
|
|
|
success in acquiring or finding additional reserves on an
economic basis;
|
|
|
|
the effects of industry competition;
|
|
|
|
the failure to realize adequate returns on wells that are
drilled;
|
|
|
|
the success of commodity price risk management and trading
activities;
|
|
|
|
the failure to fully identify potential problems related to
acquired reserves or to properly estimate those reserves;
|
|
|
|
the impact of government regulation of the oil and natural gas
industry;
|
|
|
|
the impact of weather and the occurrence of natural events and
natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
environmental liabilities; and
|
|
|
|
currency rate fluctuations.
|
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements made in this proxy
statement/prospectus or documents incorporated into this proxy
statement/prospectus or by representatives of Apache or Mariner.
These statements speak only as of the date hereof, or, in the
case of statements in any document incorporated by reference, as
of the date of such document, or, in the case of statements made
by representatives of Apache or Mariner, on the date those
statements are made. All subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements concerning the merger, the combined
company or any other matter addressed in this proxy
statement/prospectus and attributable to Apache, Mariner or any
person acting on behalf of either company are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
contained or referred to in this section. Apache and Mariner
expressly disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise
forward-looking statements in light of new information, future
events or otherwise.
40
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION ABOUT APACHE
In this section, references to we,
us, our, and Apache include
Apache Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless
otherwise specifically stated.
Insurance
We maintain insurance coverage that includes coverage for
physical damage to our oil and gas properties, third party
liability, workers compensation and employers
liability, general liability, sudden pollution and other
coverage. Our insurance coverage includes deductibles which must
be met prior to recovery. Additionally, our insurance is subject
to exclusions and limitations and there is no assurance that
such coverage will adequately protect us against liability from
all potential consequences and damages.
In general, our current insurance policies covering physical
damage to our oil and gas assets provide $250 million per
occurrence with an additional $250 million per year.
Coverage for damage to our U.S. Gulf of Mexico assets
specifically resulting from a named windstorm, however, is
subject to a maximum of $250 million per named windstorm,
includes a self-insured retention of 40 percent of the
losses above a $100 million deductible, and is limited to
no more than two storms per year. In addition, our policies
covering physical damage to our North Sea oil and gas assets
provide $250 million per occurrence with an additional
$750 million per year.
Our various insurance policies also provide coverage for, among
other things, liability related to negative environmental
impacts of a sudden pollution event in the amount of
$750 million per occurrence, charterers legal
liability, in the amount of $1 billion per occurrence,
aircraft liability in the amount of $750 million per
occurrence, and general liability, employers liability and
auto liability in the amount of $500 million per
occurrence. Our service agreements, including drilling
contracts, generally indemnify Apache for injuries and death of
the service providers employees as well as contractors and
subcontractors hired by the service provider.
Our insurance policies generally renew in January and June of
each year, with the next renewals scheduled for 2011. In light
of the recent catastrophic accident in the Gulf of Mexico, we
may not be able to secure similar coverage for the same costs.
Future insurance coverage for our industry could increase in
cost and may include higher deductibles or retentions. In
addition, some forms of insurance may become unavailable in the
future or unavailable on terms that we believe are economically
acceptable.
Remediation
Plans and Procedures
Apache has in place for its Gulf of Mexico operations a Region
Spill Response Plan (the Plan), which details procedures for
rapid and effective response to spill events that may occur as a
result of Apaches operations. Periodically, drills are
conducted to measure and maintain the effectiveness of the Plan.
These drills include the participation of spill response
contractors, representatives of the Clean Gulf Associates (CGA,
described below), and representatives of governmental agencies.
The primary association available to Apache in the event of a
spill is CGA. Apache has received approval for the Plan from the
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulatory and
Enforcement(formerly, the Minerals Management Service). Apache
personnel review the Plan annually and update where necessary.
Apache is a member of, and has an employee representative on the
executive committee of, CGA, a
not-for-profit
association of producing and pipeline companies operating in the
Gulf of Mexico. CGA was created to provide a means of
effectively staging response equipment and providing immediate
spill response for its member companies operations in the
Gulf of Mexico. To this end, CGA has bareboat chartered its
marine equipment to the Marine Spill Response Corporation
(MSRC), a national, private,
not-for-profit
marine spill response organization, which is funded by grants
from the Marine Preservation Association. MSRC maintains
CGAs equipment (including skimmers, fast response vessels,
fast response containment-skimming units, a large skimming
containment barge, numerous containment systems, wildlife
cleaning and rehabilitation facilities and dispersant inventory)
at various staging points around the Gulf of Mexico in its ready
state, and in the event of a spill, MSRC stands ready to
mobilize all of this equipment to CGA members. MSRC also
41
handles the maintenance and mobilization of CGA non-marine
equipment. MSRC has contracts in place with many environmental
contractors around the country, in addition to hundreds of other
companies which provide support services during spill response.
In the event of a spill, MSRC will activate these contracts as
necessary to provide additional resources or support services
requested by its customers. In addition, CGA maintains a
contract with Airborne Support Inc. (ASI), which provides
aircrafts and dispersant capabilities for CGA member companies.
Apaches annual fees for 2009 consisted of $213,445 based
on a $12,800 per capita charge plus $200,645 based on annual
production of approximately 24 million barrels of oil
equivalent.
In the event that CGA and MSRC resources are already being
utilized, other associations are available to Apache. Apache is
a member of Oil Spill Response Limited, which entitles any
Apache entity worldwide to access their service. Oil Spill
Response Limited is the worlds largest oil spill
preparedness and response organization, dedicated to providing
resources to respond to oil spills efficiently and effectively
on a global basis. In addition, resources of other organizations
are available to Apache as a non-member, such as those of
National Response Corporation (NRC) and MSRC, albeit at a higher
cost.
In light of the current events in the Gulf of Mexico, Apache is
participating in a number of industry-wide task forces, which
are studying ways to better access and control blowouts in
subsea environments and increase containment and recovery
methods. Two such task forces are the Subsea Well Control and
Containment Task Force and the Offshore Operating Procedures
Task Force.
Competitive
Conditions
The oil and gas business is highly competitive in the
exploration for and acquisitions of reserves, the acquisition of
oil and gas leases, equipment and personnel required to find and
produce reserves and in the gathering and marketing of oil, gas
and natural gas liquids. Our competitors include national oil
companies, major integrated oil and gas companies, other
independent oil and gas companies and participants in other
industries supplying energy and fuel to industrial, commercial
and individual consumers.
Certain of our competitors may possess financial or other
resources substantially larger than we possess or have
established strategic long-term positions and maintain strong
governmental relationships in countries in which we may seek new
entry. As a consequence, we may be at a competitive disadvantage
in bidding for leases or drilling rights.
However, we believe our diversified portfolio of core assets,
which is comprised of large acreage positions and well
established production bases across six countries, and our
balanced production mix between oil and gas give us a strong
competitive position relative to many of our competitors who do
not possess similar political, geographic and production
diversity. Our global position provides a large inventory of
geologic and geographic opportunities in the six countries in
which we have producing operations to which we can reallocate
capital investments in response to changes in local business
environments and markets. It also reduces the risk that we will
be materially impacted by an event in a specific area or country.
While the merger, if consummated, will increase our holdings in
the U.S., we believe that following the merger Apache will
maintain asset diversity, as production from our international
locations is projected to increase for the next several years as
longer-term projects to develop significant discoveries are
completed.
Environmental
Compliance
As an owner or lessee and operator of oil and gas properties, we
are subject to numerous federal, provincial, state, local and
foreign country laws and regulations relating to discharge of
materials into, and protection of, the environment. These laws
and regulations may, among other things, impose liability on the
lessee under an oil and gas lease for the cost of pollution
clean-up
resulting from operations, subject the lessee to liability for
pollution damages and require suspension or cessation of
operations in affected areas. Although environmental
requirements have a substantial impact upon the energy industry,
as a whole, we do not believe that these requirements affect us
differently, to any material degree, than other companies in our
industry.
We have made and will continue to make expenditures in our
efforts to comply with these requirements, which we believe are
necessary business costs in the oil and gas industry. We have
established policies for
42
continuing compliance with environmental laws and regulations,
including regulations applicable to our operations in all
countries in which we do business. We have established operating
procedures and training programs designed to limit the
environmental impact of our field facilities and identify and
comply with changes in existing laws and regulations. The costs
incurred under these policies and procedures are inextricably
connected to normal operating expenses such that we are unable
to separate expenses related to environmental matters; however,
we do not believe expenses related to training and compliance
with regulations and laws that have been adopted or enacted to
regulate the discharge of materials into the environment will
have a material impact on our capital expenditures, earnings or
competitive position.
Changes to existing, or additions of, laws, regulations,
enforcement policies or requirements in one or more of the
countries or regions in which we operate could require us to
make additional capital expenditures. While the recent events in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico have resulted in the enactment of,
and may result in the enactment of additional, laws or
requirements regulating the discharge of materials into the
environment, we do not believe that any such regulations or laws
enacted or adopted as of this date will have a material adverse
impact on Apaches, Mariners, or the combined
companys cost of operations, earnings or competitive
position.
43
THE
COMPANIES
Apache
Corporation
Apache, a Delaware corporation formed in 1954, is an independent
energy company that explores for, develops and produces natural
gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids. In North America,
Apaches exploration and production interests are focused
in the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf Coast, East Texas, the Permian
Basin, the Anadarko Basin and the Western Sedimentary Basin of
Canada. Outside of North America, Apache has exploration and
production interests onshore Egypt, offshore Western Australia,
offshore the U.K. in the North Sea (North Sea), and onshore
Argentina. Apache also has exploration interests on the Chilean
side of the island of Tierra del Fuego.
Apaches common stock is listed on the NYSE, the Chicago
Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ National Market and trades under
the symbol APA.
Apaches principal executive offices are located at One
Post Oak Central, 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100,
Houston, Texas 77056, its telephone number is
(713) 296-6000
and its website is www.apachecorp.com.
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business
and financial information about Apache by reference to other
documents that are not included in or delivered with this proxy
statement/prospectus. For a list of the documents that are
incorporated by reference, see Where You Can Find More
Information; Incorporation By Reference.
Mariner
Energy, Inc.
Mariner, a Delaware corporation formed in 1983, is an
independent oil and gas exploration, development, and production
company headquartered in Houston, Texas, with principal
operations in the Permian Basin, Gulf Coast and the Gulf of
Mexico.
Mariners common stock is listed on the NYSE and trades
under the symbol ME.
Mariners principal executive offices are located at One
BriarLake Plaza, Suite 2000, 2000 West Sam Houston
Parkway South, Houston, Texas 77042, its telephone number is
(713) 954-5500
and its website is www.mariner-energy.com.
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business
and financial information about Mariner from other documents
that are not included in or delivered with this proxy
statement/prospectus. For a list of the documents that are
incorporated by reference, see Where You Can Find More
Information; Incorporation By Reference.
ZMZ
Acquisitions LLC
ZMZ Acquisitions LLC, which is sometimes referred to as Merger
Sub, is a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Apache. Merger Sub was formed solely for the
purpose of entering into the merger agreement. Merger Sub has
not carried on any activities to date, except for activities
incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in
connection with the merger.
Merger Subs principal executive offices are located at One
Post Oak Central, 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100,
Houston, Texas 77056 and its telephone number is
(713) 296-6000.
44
THE
MERGER
General
Apache, Merger Sub and Mariner have entered into the merger
agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement and in accordance with Delaware law, Mariner will be
merged with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub continuing as
the surviving entity. Upon completion of the merger, Mariner
will cease to exist and Mariner common stock will no longer be
outstanding or publicly traded.
Under the merger agreement, Mariner stockholders may elect to
receive consideration consisting of cash, shares of Apache
common stock or a combination of both in exchange for their
shares of Mariner common stock, subject to a proration feature.
Mariner stockholders electing to receive a mix of cash and stock
consideration and non-electing stockholders will receive $7.80
in cash and 0.17043 shares of Apache common stock, in
exchange for each share of Mariner common stock. Subject to
proration, Mariner stockholders electing to receive all cash
will receive $26.00 in cash per Mariner share and Mariner
stockholders electing to receive only Apache common stock will
receive 0.24347 shares of Apache common stock in exchange
for each share of Mariner common stock.
The aggregate cash consideration to be received by Mariner
stockholders pursuant to the merger will be fixed at an amount
equal to the product of $7.80 and the number of shares of
Mariner common stock outstanding immediately prior to the
closing of the merger less 714,887 shares of outstanding
unvested restricted stock that will be cancelled upon the
merger. Such cash amount is expected to be approximately
$800 million. Similarly, the aggregate number of shares of
Apache common stock to be received by Mariner stockholders
pursuant to the merger will be fixed at a number equal to the
product of 0.17043 and the number of shares of Mariner common
stock outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the merger
less 714,887 shares of outstanding unvested restricted
stock that will be cancelled upon the merger. Such number of
shares is expected to be approximately 17.5 million shares
of Apache common stock. Accordingly, if Mariner stockholders
elect, in the aggregate, to receive cash in an amount greater
than the aggregate cash consideration payable under the merger
agreement, then those holders electing to receive all cash
consideration will be prorated down and will receive Apache
stock as a portion of the overall consideration they receive for
their shares. On the other hand, if Mariner stockholders elect,
in the aggregate, to receive stock in an amount greater than the
aggregate number of shares issuable under the merger agreement,
then those holders electing to receive all stock consideration
will be prorated down and will receive cash as a portion of the
overall consideration they receive for their shares. As a
result, Mariner stockholders that make a valid election to
receive all cash or all stock consideration may not receive
merger consideration entirely in the form elected.
The share exchange ratios in the merger agreement are fixed and
will not change between now and the completion of the merger,
regardless of whether the market price of either Apache or
Mariner common stock changes. The market price of Apache common
stock will fluctuate prior to the merger and the market price of
Apache common stock received by Mariner stockholders after
completion of the merger could be greater or less than the
current market price of Apache common stock and the price of
Apache common stock at the election deadline. In addition, the
time of the completion of the merger, the values of the three
forms of merger consideration that Mariner stockholders will
have the right to receive (which are
(i) 0.24347 shares of Apache common stock per Mariner
share, subject to proration, (ii) $26.00 in cash per
Mariner share, subject to proration, or (iii) a combination
of $7.80 in cash and 0.17043 shares of Apache common stock
per Mariner share) may not be equal due to fluctuations in the
market price of Apache common stock. See Risk
Factors Risks Relating to the Merger As
a result of the consideration election and proration provisions
of the merger agreement, and because the market price of Apache
common stock will fluctuate, Mariner stockholders cannot be sure
of the aggregate value of the merger consideration they will
receive.
Apache will not issue any fractional shares of its common stock
in connection with the merger. For each fractional share that
would otherwise be issued, Apache will pay cash (without
interest) in an amount equal to the product of the fractional
share and the average of the closing price of Apache common
stock on the NYSE, as reported in The Wall Street Journal, for
the five consecutive trading days ending on the calendar day
immediately prior the closing date of the merger.
45
Background
of the Merger
Mariner regularly reviews and assesses potential industry and
strategic alternatives in order to enhance stockholder value. In
connection with these reviews and in an effort to ensure that
Mariners board is fully informed regarding potential
avenues for increasing stockholder value, from time to time
Mariners management meets with investment bankers to
discuss strategic business opportunities, including acquisitions
of and combinations with other companies. In one such meeting in
April 2008, Mr. Josey and a representative of Credit Suisse
discussed a number of companies that might present strategic
business opportunities for Mariner. Apache was one such company
discussed, as both companies operate in the Gulf of Mexico shelf
and deepwater and in the Permian Basin. From time to time the
companies had engaged in farm-out agreements and other ordinary
course transactions, and they also owned working interests in
some of the same properties, including the Geauxpher prospect at
Garden Banks 462. The companies had enjoyed a good working
relationship. In April and May 2008, a representative of Credit
Suisse met with Roger Plank, Apaches President, and
discussed strategic opportunities between Apache and Mariner.
In May 2008, G. Steven Farris, Apaches Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, contacted Scott D. Josey, Mariners
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, to suggest that
they meet to discuss a potential business combination.
Messrs. Farris and Josey met on May 22, 2008 to
discuss such a transaction. Mr. Farris did not present any
specific proposal at that time. Mr. Josey responded that he
would discuss the matter with members of Mariners board.
Mr. Josey subsequently reported on his conversation with
Mr. Farris to two Mariner directors, Bernard Aronson
(Mariners presiding independent director) and Jonathan
Ginns. Mr. Aronson relayed the information provided by
Mr. Josey to the other members of Mariners board.
Representatives of Apache and Mariner negotiated the terms of a
confidentiality agreement over the following weeks, and on
June 17, 2008, the parties executed an agreement. In the
confidentiality agreement Apache agreed to a
standstill provision providing that it would not,
for a period of two years, acquire or seek, offer or propose to
acquire any securities or assets of Mariner or take other
actions seeking to control or influence Mariner. The
confidentiality agreement also restricted acquisitions by Apache
of interests in certain properties for which Mariner was the
apparent high bidder at an offshore lease sale that had recently
occurred, but for which leases had not yet been awarded to
Mariner. Following execution of the confidentiality agreement on
June 17, several members of Mariner management and Ryder
Scott Company, L.P., the petroleum consulting firm primarily
responsible for overseeing the preparation of Mariners
reserve estimates, met with representatives of Apache to review
reserve estimates, prospects and financial and legal matters.
Over the course of the next few days, subsequent conversations
took place between members of management of the two companies
regarding the means of conducting accounting and tax due
diligence and personnel matters.
On June 19, 2008, Messrs. Farris and Josey met to
discuss Mariners prospects and other due diligence issues.
On June 20, 2008, at a telephonic special meeting of
Mariners board, Mr. Josey reported on the status of
discussions with, and due diligence conducted by, Apache. The
board also considered the retention of Credit Suisse as
Mariners financial advisor in connection with a potential
transaction. The board noted Credit Suisses knowledge of
Mariner, having previously provided Mariner with financial
advisory and other investment banking services, and Credit
Suisses knowledge of the oil and gas industry and
experience as a financial advisor in connection with
transactions similar to the proposed merger. Credit Suisse was
formally engaged by Mariner on June 25, 2008. The board
requested that Mr. Josey provide updates as appropriate to
Mr. Aronson, who would communicate with the other directors.
Over the course of the following nine weeks, representatives of
Mariner, Ryder Scott, Deloitte & Touche LLP
(Mariners independent auditor) and PricewaterhouseCoopers
(tax consultant to Mariner) provided Apache with additional due
diligence information regarding Mariners reserve
estimates, prospect inventory, financial condition, accounting,
tax, and legal matters, among other things.
On August 19, 2008, Mr. Farris met with Mr. Josey
at Mariners offices in Houston. Mr. Farris said that
Apache would be willing to acquire Mariner for consideration
worth $30 per share of Mariner common stock, which represented a
premium of approximately 3.5% to Mariners then-current
stock price (at that time,
46
commodity prices were significantly higher than 2010 levels).
Mr. Farris also indicated that the proposed transaction
would potentially be contingent upon completing the sale of a
limited-term overriding royalty interest in a fixed volume of
Mariners oil and gas reserves prior to consummation of the
merger. Mr. Josey stated his view that the proposed
consideration was too low and that the risk associated with the
sale of the overriding royalty interest was unacceptable, but he
said he would convey Apaches proposal to the Mariner
board. Mr. Josey discussed the proposal with the Mariner
directors individually. Following those discussions, he reported
to Mr. Farris that Mariner was not interested in further
pursuit of a transaction at that time.
On February 1, 2010, a representative of the financial
advisor to another company, referred to as Company A, contacted
Mr. Josey to request a meeting to discuss a potential
business combination transaction. On February 8, 2010,
representatives of Company A and Company As financial
advisor met with Mr. Josey to express interest in acquiring
Mariner for a purchase price of $18 to $19 per share. The
representatives stated that the proposal was based on, among
other things, Company As review of Mariners reserve
estimates as of December 31, 2008, but not its 2009 reserve
estimates, which had only recently been disclosed.
On February 19, 2010, representatives of Credit Suisse
discussed with Mariner management the possibility of a public
offering of equity securities of a new company formed to hold
certain onshore assets. Specifically, the concept discussed
involved Mariner contributing its Permian Basin operations,
including its interests in the Spraberry, Dean and Wolfcamp
trends and exploration activities in emerging plays such as the
Wolfberry and Wolfcamp trends, to a subsidiary, and selling a
portion of the equity of that subsidiary to the public in a
registered offering. The discussion included various
implications of such a transaction on a hypothetical basis,
including governance matters, financial statement requirements
and capital structure. This alternative was not pursued for a
number of reasons, including the reduced diversification that
would result from such a transaction and covenant restrictions
in Mariners debt agreements.
On February 23, 2010, the Mariner board discussed Company
As proposal and concluded that the proposed consideration
was insufficient but authorized management to allow Company A to
review nonpublic information, with the expectation that Company
A would be able to increase its proposed purchase price
substantially following its review of Mariners prospects
and 2009 year-end reserve estimates. The board did not direct
management to solicit alternative transactions to the proposal
made by Company A at that time because it did not consider
Mariner to be for sale and, until a compelling offer was made by
a potential purchaser, the board intended to continue to pursue
Mariners strategic plan. The board also discussed
Mariners strategy as a diversified company, marketing and
messaging with respect to its strategy and various potential
alternatives for its operating regions. The board reviewed a
sum of the parts analysis prepared by Mariner
management that attempted to evaluate each of Mariners
operating regions based on valuation metrics of several
non-diversified, publicly-traded companies, each operating
primarily in one of Mariners operating regions. The
analysis indicated that the stock of Mariner, as a diversified
company, traded at a significant discount to the sum of the
estimated values of its operating regions if they were valued
similarly to the non-diversified or pure play
companies in those regions. The sum of the parts analysis
reflected a potential trading range for Mariner common stock of
$25.23 to $35.59 per share, excluding estimated values for
certain unbooked Mariner discoveries but providing methodologies
for valuing Mariners interests in those discoveries. From
time to time, management and the board discussed Mariners
long-term strategy, which included the pursuit of diversity and
balance in its property portfolio and hydrocarbon mix and
increasing its onshore presence, including unconventional
resource plays. During the February 23, 2010 board meeting,
management and the board discussed Mariners strategic
direction and whether alternatives to its strategy should be
explored to more fully realize their view of the value of the
company. The possibility of one or more divestiture transactions
or a spin-off of a portion of Mariners operations was
discussed, but the board concluded there was no reason to change
its existing strategy at that time. Earlier that month, Mariner
had provided the sum of the parts analysis and the potential
trading range in a February 4 public presentation to the
investor community at the Credit Suisse Energy Summit Conference
and also made it publicly available on Mariners website.
Subsequent to that public presentation and through the February
23 board meeting, Mariners common stock closed at prices
ranging from $13.65 to $15.52. Subsequently, management used the
methodologies provided to the board at the February 23 board
meeting to assign values to the unbooked discoveries and
included those values, as well as values for a significant
portion of Mariners deepwater
47
exploration prospect portfolio prepared by a third-party
engineering firm, in public presentations to the investor
community on March 2, March 23 and April 13, 2010 and
made publicly available on Mariners website, reflecting a
potential trading range for Mariner common stock of
approximately $43 to $60 per share. Subsequent to the first of
those public presentations and through the date prior to the
announcement of the merger with Apache, Mariners common
stock closed at prices ranging from $14.13 to $18.09.
Mariner and Company A negotiated and, on March 11, 2010,
executed a confidentiality agreement in a form substantially
similar to the one previously entered into with Apache,
including a two-year standstill provision. Later that day,
several members of Mariners management team met with
representatives of Company A to provide information regarding
Mariners 2009 reserve estimates, prospects and financial
matters. Representatives of Company A also were provided access
to representatives of Ryder Scott to perform a more detailed
review of Mariners reserve estimates. During the course of
the diligence meetings on March 11, Mr. Josey met with
a representative of Company A to discuss the expected timing of
a revised proposal. The representative advised Mr. Josey
that Company As board of directors had approved
discussions regarding a business combination and that their
board planned to meet on April 16, 2010 to consider a
revised proposal to acquire Mariner.
From March 11, 2010, until April 9, 2010, members of
Mariners management team provided additional due diligence
information to representatives of Company A.
On March 25, 2010, at Mr. Farriss request,
Mr. Josey met with Messrs. Farris and Plank at
Apaches offices in Houston. At the meeting Mr. Farris
suggested that Apache and Mariner re-engage in discussions
regarding a business combination, because the two companies had
a great asset and people fit and Mariners deepwater
position was desirable to Apache, but he did not present any
specific proposal. Mr. Josey responded by saying that the
consideration in any proposal would need to reflect a
substantial premium in order to be successful. Mr. Josey
also indicated to Messrs. Farris and Plank that another
party had expressed an interest in acquiring Mariner, that it
was undertaking due diligence, and that the board of directors
of the other party planned to meet on April 16 to consider a
possible transaction. Mr. Farris responded that, due to its
extensive analysis of Mariner in 2008, Apache could be ready
with an offer and a merger agreement on an accelerated timeline.
Mr. Josey also stated that even though Mariner could
provide confidential data to Apache under the 2008
confidentiality agreement which remained in effect until June
2010, he would prefer that the parties execute an extension
before he arranged for additional confidential information about
Mariner to be delivered to Apache.
Apache and Mariner entered into a new confidentiality agreement
on March 26, 2010, in a form substantially similar to the
prior agreement between the parties. Shortly after execution of
the confidentiality agreement, Mariner made diligence materials
available, and meetings occurred between representatives of
Mariner, Ryder Scott and Apache over the next two weeks.
On April 1, 2010, Apaches board of directors convened
a special meeting to consider the potential transaction with
Mariner. The board was presented with financial and operational
information about Mariner, including an update on developments
in Mariners business since a possible transaction had been
last considered by the board in 2008. At the end of the meeting
and after extensive discussion, the board authorized Apache
management to continue its pursuit of a transaction with Mariner
for consideration of up to $25 per share with at least 70%
payable in Apache common stock.
On April 5, 2010, Mr. Josey met with Mr. Farris
at Apaches offices. At this meeting, Messrs. Josey
and Farris discussed in general terms the per-share purchase
price of a potential acquisition, with Mr. Josey indicating
his belief that the Mariner board would be disappointed with any
offer below $25 per share, and that an offer may need to be as
high as $30 per share in order to be approved.
Messrs. Josey and Farris also discussed generally the
possibility of making a portion of the consideration contingent
on the success of the Heidelberg #2 well in the Gulf
of Mexico deepwater, which was being drilled on a prospect in
which Mariner has an interest (referred to as the Heidelberg
well). Mr. Josey also requested that, in accordance with
the confidentiality agreement, Apache should not provide a
written offer to Mariner unless it was invited to do so by
Mariners board of directors. Mr. Farris thanked
Mr. Josey for the information, and did not present him
48
with an offer. That afternoon the parties amended the
confidentiality agreement to permit advisors and additional
employees of Apache to assist in the due diligence effort.
Following his meeting with Mr. Josey, Mr. Farris met
with Apaches financial advisors, Goldman,
Sachs & Co., referred to as Goldman Sachs, and
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., referred to as
J.P. Morgan, to inform them of his conversation with
Mr. Josey. Over the next two days, Messrs. Farris and
Plank, other Apache senior management, and representatives of
Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan worked on preparing an
appropriate initial proposal to Mariner.
As part of preparing the initial proposal, Mr. Farris
telephoned each of the members of Apaches board, informed
them of developments, and discussed with them the possible terms
that were being developed. In the course of consultation with
the directors, Mr. Farris was given the discretion to offer
to Mariner a combination of cash and Apache common stock as
consideration in the merger.
On April 7, 2010, a representative of Company A sent an
e-mail to
Jesus G. Melendrez, Mariners Senior Vice President, Chief
Commercial Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer, to inform him that Company As board meeting to
discuss a potential transaction with Mariner would be delayed.
The following day, Mr. Melendrez advised representatives of
Company A and its financial advisor that such delay was not in
Company As interest.
Also on April 7, 2010, Mr. Farris called
Mr. Josey to notify him that Apache was prepared to send a
term sheet describing its offer to acquire Mariner and that
Apache was highly motivated to complete a transaction because of
the strategic fit of Mariners assets with Apaches
North American operations. He communicated that it was important
to Apache that a merger agreement be signed and a transaction be
announced very quickly. Mr. Farris also told Mr. Josey
that Apache would not engage in an auction process in connection
with a possible transaction. Mr. Josey responded that he
would discuss the terms of the initial proposal with the Mariner
board and call Mr. Farris afterwards. Mr. Josey then
advised Mariners presiding independent director of the
conversation, and the director organized a board meeting to be
held that afternoon.
Following his conversation with Mr. Josey, Mr. Farris
telephoned each of Apaches directors separately and
informed them of the terms of the initial proposal. Each
director was supportive of the proposal and instructed
Mr. Farris to continue pursuing the transaction with
Mariner.
Later in the day on April 7, 2010, Apache sent Mariner a
term sheet proposing a merger for consideration of $25.00 per
share, payable in a combination of cash (30%) and shares of
Apache common stock (70%) at a fixed exchange ratio. Apache
stated that the $25 proposal represented a premium of 47% to
Mariners closing price and a 63% premium to Mariners
30-day
average trading price, each as of April 6, 2010. The term
sheet further proposed that the consideration would be increased
or decreased by $2.00 per share depending on success or lack of
success at the Heidelberg #2 well. The Heidelberg well
was expected to be completed in May 2010 and was designed to
delineate the lateral extent of the M-15 sand of the reservoir
found in a discovery well that reached total depth in 2009, and
to explore another potential target in the lower Miocene sand.
Because of the contingent adjustment to the proposed purchase
price (a result of which was that the consideration would either
be $23.00 or $27.00 per share, but never $25.00), Apaches
proposal effectively offered consideration of $23.00 per share
with a possible $4.00 increase for success at the Heidelberg
well. The term sheet stated that it would expire on
April 14, 2010, and that Apache had prepared a draft merger
agreement and was prepared to begin negotiations immediately.
The term sheet also stated Apaches intention to be able to
announce a transaction within days and in no event later than
April 14, 2010.
After receipt of the term sheet, Mariners board convened a
telephonic special meeting on April 7, 2010 to discuss the
proposal, including the financial terms, the likelihood that the
transaction could be successfully completed, and potential
responses to the proposal. Also present at the invitation of the
board were representatives of Baker Botts L.L.P., outside
counsel to Mariner, who discussed with the directors certain
legal matters, including their fiduciary duties to stockholders
in connection with a potential business combination transaction.
During the meeting, Mr. Josey updated the directors on his
discussions with Mr. Farris. After discussing the terms
proposed in the Apache term sheet and Mariners other
prospects, the board decided to seek to reengage Credit Suisse
as Mariners financial advisor in connection with a
potential
49
transaction, given Credit Suisses familiarity with
Mariner and its prior engagement as Mariners financial
advisor in 2008 in connection with Mariners discussions
regarding a potential transaction with Apache. The board
discussed the interests of Mariner executive officers with
respect to the merger, apart from their interests as Mariner
stockholders, and the risk that these interests might influence
their decisions with respect to the merger. The board instructed
Mr. Josey to tell Mr. Farris that the board was
seriously considering Apaches proposal and would respond
promptly after further analysis and after consulting with Credit
Suisse. The board also received a status report on discussions
with Company A. Credit Suisse was contacted that evening and
instructed to begin preparing an analysis of Apaches
proposal for discussion with the board.
On April 8, 2010, Mr. Josey called Mr. Farris to
update him on the boards reaction to the proposal and on
next steps. Messrs. Josey and Farris briefly discussed the
terms reflected in the term sheet, particularly Apaches
rationale for proposing consideration contingent upon the
success of the Heidelberg well. Other members of Mariner
management met that day and on April 9, 2010 with Apache
representatives to discuss how to define success at
the Heidelberg well for purposes of determining whether the
contingent consideration would be paid.
On April 9, 2010, Mariners board again convened a
telephonic special meeting, with representatives of Mariner
management, Baker Botts and Credit Suisse also attending.
Mr. Josey briefed the board on his April 8 discussion with
Mr. Farris. Representatives of Credit Suisse reviewed its
preliminary financial analyses with respect to Mariner and the
proposed merger. The board, with the assistance of management
and Credit Suisse, also evaluated and discussed potential
business combination transactions with other companies
(including Company A), taking into account the various financial
and operational characteristics of the other potential partners
and the probable level of interest and strategic rationale for
each company to engage in a business combination with Mariner,
and the financial capability of each to complete a transaction.
The board, management and Credit Suisse also discussed that
although other companies might have an interest in acquiring
Mariners Permian Basin, South Texas, Gulf of Mexico
deepwater, Gulf of Mexico shelf or unconventional resource play
properties individually, they did not know (based on their
knowledge of the industry) of any companies that would be
interested in purchasing, or positioned to take fullest
advantage of, all of Mariners operating areas. Further,
over the last several years, many companies have been exiting
the Gulf of Mexico, and Apache was one of the few companies
looking to add to its shelf asset base. It was expected that
other potential acquirers, if any, might wish to divest of one
or more of the operating areas and thus would be unlikely to
value Mariner as highly as Apache, who had an existing presence
in the Permian Basin, Gulf Coast onshore, Gulf of Mexico
deepwater and shelf, interest in unconventional resource plays
and a stated desire to expand their Gulf of Mexico deepwater
operations. These attributes created what the board and
management viewed as a strong strategic fit with Mariners
asset portfolio, which they believed would maximize potential
merger consideration. The board, in consultation with its legal
and financial advisors, also considered the potential benefits
of conducting an auction process or other effort to solicit
interest from other potential buyers prior to the execution and
delivery of a merger agreement with Apache, and what it viewed
as a substantial risk that conducting such a process could cause
Apache to terminate discussions with Mariner given Apaches
stated intention not to participate in an auction and insistence
on a short time frame. Given the view that other companies
lacked the strategic fit that had attracted Apache to Mariner,
the board, following review and discussion with Credit Suisse,
concluded that any potential competing bidders were unlikely to
offer a price higher than the price proposed by Apache. Taking
into account all of these factors, as well as the premium to
Mariners stock price that the proposed merger
consideration represented, the board decided not to solicit
alternative transactions to the Apache merger, other than its
ongoing process with Company A.
The board also considered the risks and opportunities of Mariner
remaining an independent company and the risk that Mariner would
not achieve or exceed a stock price comparable to the proposed
merger consideration within a reasonable period of time, taking
into account the competitive landscape, the risks inherent in
Mariners business activities, fluctuations in the
availability of capital and the volatility of commodity prices.
The board considered these risks notwithstanding the sum of the
parts analysis first presented to the public on February 4,
2010 and discussed at the February 23, 2010 board meeting.
While the sum of the parts analysis illustrated the view that
Mariners stock was undervalued by the market on a relative
basis compared to non-diversified pure play
companies, the board had recognized that the upside potential
50
values reflected in the analysis were subject to significant
risks and, given historical performance of Mariners stock
and analyst sentiment, could not predict when, if ever, such
values might be achieved. The board believed the undervaluation
had been prevalent for an extended period of time and was due in
part to the fact that companies like Mariner with diversified
reserve portfolios generally trade at a discount to their pure
play competitors. The board had recognized that the range of
values presented in the analysis assigned significant value to
nonproved reserves that remained subject to material operating
and commodity price risks and future availability of capital.
After extensive discussion, the directors determined to
reconvene on April 11, 2010 to continue their review of a
potential transaction with Apache.
On April 10, 2010, Mr. Josey called Mr. Farris to
update him on the boards process and timing. He stated
that Apaches initial proposal would have to be improved,
and he suggested in particular that the contingent consideration
proposal regarding the Heidelberg well be amended to consist of
an increase in the event of success, without a corresponding
decrease. Mr. Farris agreed to reconsider Apaches
proposal in light of Mr. Joseys comments, but he
emphasized that, in light of Mariners previously planned
analyst conference scheduled for April 15, 2010, Apache
felt very strongly that an agreement must be executed and the
transaction announced no later than April 14, 2010.
Following the call, Mr. Farris, Apaches senior
management and its financial advisors met telephonically to
discuss Mr. Joseys response to Apaches initial
offer. After considerable discussion, Mr. Farris and Apache
management decided that at the next discussion between the
parties, Apache would offer $26 per Mariner share, payable in a
combination of 30% cash and 70% Apache common stock, but without
any contingent consideration relating to the Heidelberg well.
Later that day, P. Anthony Lannie, Apaches Executive Vice
President and General Counsel, sent a draft merger agreement to
Teresa G. Bushman, Mariners Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary.
On April 11, 2010, the Mariner board convened a telephonic
special meeting, with representatives of Mariner management,
Baker Botts, Credit Suisse and Morris, Nichols,
Arsht & Tunnell LLP, special Delaware counsel to
Mariner, also attending. Mr. Josey updated the directors on
his latest discussion with Mr. Farris, including
Mr. Farris emphasis on announcing a transaction by
April 14, 2010. Representatives of Baker Botts briefed the
board on the terms reflected in the draft merger agreement
provided by Apache, which included, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
a condition to Apaches obligation to close that oil and
natural gas commodity market prices not fall below specified
levels;
|
|
|
|
a condition to Apaches obligation to close that hurricane
damage to Mariners assets not exceed 10% of the
consideration payable to Mariner stockholders in the merger;
|
|
|
|
a termination fee, payable by Mariner in the event that it
terminated the agreement to accept an alternative acquisition
proposal or in other specified circumstances, of 3.75% of the
value of the consideration payable to Mariner
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
in addition to the termination fee, an incremental obligation to
reimburse Apaches expenses capped at 2% of the value of
the equity consideration.
|
Representatives of Baker Botts and Morris Nichols reviewed for
the directors their fiduciary duties and other legal matters.
Representatives of Credit Suisse discussed certain financial
aspects of Apaches proposal, including potential collar
mechanisms regarding the Apache common stock proposed to be
received in the merger. After extensive discussion, the board
authorized Mr. Josey to propose to Apache consideration of
$26 per share with a $2.50 increase if the Heidelberg well were
successful, payable 30% in cash and 70% in Apache stock at a
fixed exchange ratio. In considering whether to negotiate for a
collar mechanism or adjustable exchange ratio, the board noted
that Mariners stockholders, on an aggregate basis, would
receive the benefit of any increase in the price per share of
Apache common stock at the time of closing relative to its price
at the execution of the merger agreement, although they would
receive less valuable consideration if the price of Apache stock
decreased during that period. The board also noted that Mariner
stockholders, on an aggregate basis, would receive a substantial
cash payment that would not be affected by any change in the
51
trading price of Apache common stock, which would act as an
effective collar on the exchange ratio. In light of these
factors the board determined that a fixed exchange ratio without
a collar mechanism was appropriate.
Messrs. Josey and Farris spoke by phone later in the
evening of April 11, 2010. Mr. Josey conveyed the
boards purchase price proposal and indicated to
Mr. Farris that the sections of Apaches draft merger
agreement regarding proposed closing conditions based on
commodity prices and hurricane damage were not acceptable, that
the termination fee must be lower and that the expense
reimbursement must be eliminated. Mr. Farris expressed
concern that it would be difficult to define the parameters for
success at the Heidelberg well and suggested that the merger
consideration be set at $25 per share with no contingent
consideration adjustment. Mr. Josey responded that $25 per
share was insufficient, to which Mr. Farris responded that
Apaches best and final offer would be a purchase price set
at $26 per share with no adjustment. Mr. Josey agreed to
discuss Apaches proposal with the Mariner board.
Mariners board met telephonically on April 12, 2010
with representatives of Credit Suisse, Baker Botts, Morris
Nichols and members of management also in attendance. During the
meeting, Mr. Josey reported on his April 11, 2010
conversation with Mr. Farris, including the fact that
Apaches best and final offer did not contain a
contingent consideration adjustment. After extensive discussion
and consideration of Mariners possible responses and
various strategic alternatives, the board authorized
Mr. Josey to accept the proposed $26 per share purchase
price, with a breakup fee of less than 3%. The board concluded
that proceeding without a contingent consideration adjustment
was appropriate in light of the significant operational and
financial risks associated with the Heidelberg well, including,
among other things, uncertainty regarding the future cost and
timing of drilling, completing and producing the well, the
future cost and availability of capital, and the risks
associated with unexpected drilling conditions, pressure or
irregularities in formations, equipment failures or accidents,
adverse weather conditions (including hurricanes), loop
currents, compliance with governmental regulations, reductions
in commodity prices, fires, explosions, blow-outs and surface
cratering, pipe or cement failures and casing collapses.
Accordingly, the board determined that a fixed purchase price
could appropriately reflect the risked value of that discovery
as well as Mariners recent drilling success at the
Lucius-1 ST-1 exploration well on Keathley Canyon
Block 875. The board also received a status report on
discussions with Company A. In light of the boards view
(taking into account, among other things, the analyses provided
by Credit Suisse) that the significant premium reflected in
Apaches offer represented the best value reasonably
available for Mariners stockholders, as well as
Apaches repeated statements regarding announcing a
transaction no later than April 14, 2010 (which had been
conveyed multiple times orally by Mr. Farris and reflected
in the term sheet sent on April 7, 2010) and the risk
that Apaches offer might be withdrawn if their timing
requirements were not met, and considering the boards
previous consideration of the benefits and risks of soliciting
alternative transactions prior to any announcement, the board
instructed management and its advisors to negotiate the
definitive documentation as expeditiously as possible. The board
instructed Baker Botts to send comments to the draft merger
agreement to Apache, including a deletion of the proposed
closing conditions based on commodity prices and hurricane
damage and a reduction of the termination fee to 2% of the value
of the equity consideration, with no expense reimbursement.
Later that day, Mr. Josey spoke with Mr. Farris about
the boards decision to accept the $26 per share
consideration and informed Mr. Farris that the breakup fee
must be less than 3%, all subject to the negotiation of a
mutually acceptable merger agreement. Mr. Farris reiterated
Apaches desire to be in a position to sign and announce an
agreement by April 14, 2010. Subsequent to this discussion,
Baker Botts sent a revised draft of the merger agreement to
Apache and Andrews Kurth LLP, outside counsel to Apache.
Also on April 12, representatives of Goldman Sachs called
representatives of Credit Suisse to emphasize that Apache was
very serious about the April 14, 2010 deadline and informed
Credit Suisse that there was a real risk that Apache would not
agree to a transaction if an agreement could not be reached by
April 14, 2010.
On April 11, 2010, Mr. Josey was contacted by a
representative of Company As financial advisor regarding
the previous communication between Mr. Melendrez and
representatives of Company A concerning the delay in Company
As schedule for updating its proposal. After exchanging
messages, Mr. Josey and Company As representative
spoke on April 12, 2010. Mr. Josey told the
representative that he had been
52
advised that Company As board meeting would be delayed.
Mr. Josey stated his belief that the delay was harming
Company As credibility with Mariners board and that
any proposal should be made sooner rather than later. The
financial advisor responded that Company A expected to provide a
new proposal during the week of April 19, 2010 following
its board meeting.
On April 13, 2010, representatives of Apache, Mariner,
Credit Suisse, Baker Botts and Andrews Kurth, met telephonically
and in person at the offices of Andrews Kurth to conduct due
diligence on Apaches business and operations and to
discuss the draft merger agreement. During the merger agreement
discussions, Apache agreed to remove the proposed closing
conditions based on commodity prices and hurricane damage.
Apache stated that it was still considering Mariners
proposal on the termination fee but might agree to limit its
proposed expense reimbursement to $7.5 million. During the
course of discussions, it became apparent that Apache
interpreted the terms of Mariners employment agreements
with executives to provide that all Performance-Based Restricted
Stock would vest at closing, regardless of whether the stock
price conditions had been met. In fact, the award agreements for
the Performance-Based Restricted Stock (which provided that no
vesting would occur upon a change of control if the stock price
conditions had not been met) overrode any inconsistent terms in
the employment agreements, with the result being that no such
shares would vest at closing unless otherwise provided in the
merger agreement. Representatives of Mariner management
corrected Apaches misunderstanding of the terms of the
agreements and suggested that Apache consider vesting some
portion of the Performance-Based Restricted Stock. As of
April 14, 2010, 80 senior Mariner employees held
1,196,218 shares of Performance-Based Restricted Stock, of
which approximately 63% and 37% were held by officers and
non-officers, respectively. Three officers holding
Performance-Based Restricted Stock participated in the principal
merger discussions with Apache: Messrs. Josey (who also is
a director of Mariner) and Melendrez and Ms. Bushman. Five
officers holding Performance-Based Restricted Stock were
involved in ancillary merger discussions
and/or
diligence matters: Judd A. Hansen, Senior Vice
President Shelf and Onshore; Cory L. Loegering,
Senior Vice President Deepwater; Richard A. Molohon,
Vice President Reservoir Engineering; Dalton F.
Polasek, Chief Operating Officer; and Mike C. van den Bold,
Senior Vice President and Chief Exploration Officer. No Mariner
directors other than Mr. Josey hold Performance-Based
Restricted Stock. Apache proposed vesting 40% of the shares,
which represented the sum of the results obtained by dividing
Mariners then-current stock price by the two stock price
conditions in the award agreements (weighted according to the
proportion of awards subject to each price condition). Apache
proposed calculating the percentage to be vested with reference
to the current stock price of approximately $17.55 per
share, rather than the $26 per share proposed merger
consideration, to recognize the value created by Mariners
leadership team without taking the proposed transaction into
account. Apache agreed to the partial vesting in order to
provide additional incentive to senior Mariner employees to
remain employed through the closing of the merger, to foster a
positive working relationship with their future employees, and
in recognition of the fact that the shares would otherwise be
forfeited in only the third year of the ten-year program. Apache
reflected its proposal in a subsequent draft of the merger
agreement. On April 12 and 14, Mariner awarded a total of
121,022 shares of Performance-Based Restricted Stock to
fifteen employees who had recently been hired or promoted,
including 17,121 shares to each of Mariners Vice
President Unconventional Resources, Vice
President Offshore Land and Business Development,
and Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, and
10,000 shares to Mariners Vice President
Human Resources. The board noted that several employees had
recently been hired or promoted and had not yet received the
Performance-Based Restricted Stock grants that would have been
made to them in the ordinary course as a result of those hirings
or promotions. In the interest of equal treatment of all
similarly-situated employees, and, as discussed below,
recognizing the fact that 40% of the awards made to such other
employees would vest as a result of the merger, the board
determined it was appropriate to make the grants. On
April 13 and continuing over the next day, representatives
of the parties continued to negotiate and revise the draft
merger agreement and disclosure schedules.
Later on April 13, the Mariner board met telephonically,
with representatives of Credit Suisse and Baker Botts and
members of management also participating, to discuss the status
of the discussions with Apache. During the board meeting,
Mr. Josey reported on his April 12 conversation with
Company As financial advisor. Mr. Josey also reported
on his most recent conversations with Mr. Farris, during
which they had discussed retention and severance arrangements
for Mariners nonexecutive employees. Mariner management
and Baker Botts reported on the merger agreement discussions,
including the fact that Apache
53
had proposed (after the $26 merger consideration had been
agreed) to vest 40% of the Performance-Based Restricted Stock.
The board determined to continue with negotiations with Apache.
Later that evening, Apache sent Mariner a revised draft merger
agreement reflecting a 3% breakup fee and an incremental expense
reimbursement of $10 million.
Throughout the day on April 14, 2010, representatives of
Mariner, Apache, Baker Botts and Andrews Kurth met to
negotiate the draft merger agreement. During those discussions,
Mariner stated that the termination fee could be no higher than
2.5% of the value of the equity consideration, with no expense
reimbursement.
On the afternoon of April 14, 2010, Apaches board of
directors held a special meeting to consider the proposed
business combination, with representatives of Goldman Sachs,
J.P. Morgan, and Apaches senior management attending.
The board was provided with a substantially final draft of the
merger agreement and other materials related to the transaction.
At the meeting, Apaches financial advisors Goldman Sachs
and J.P. Morgan reviewed their financial analyses of the
proposed merger. Mr. Lannie reviewed with the board certain
legal matters relating to the boards consideration of the
proposed merger, discussed certain material terms of the merger
agreement, and reviewed the status of the remaining open issues.
Mr. Lannie informed the board that in addition to certain
drafting matters, the parties had yet to reach agreement on the
amount of a termination fee. Mr. Lannie explained that
Mariners proposal for the breakup fee was 2.5% of the
value of the equity consideration and Apaches proposal was
for 3%. After discussion and deliberation, the Apache board
approved and adopted the proposed merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, giving Mr. Farris
authority and parameters under which to resolve the remaining
open issues. Mr. Farris then contacted Mr. Josey to
inform him that the Apache board meeting had concluded and that
the board had approved the merger.
Later on April 14, Mariners board again convened
telephonically to consider the terms of the proposed
transaction. Prior to the meeting the directors received a
packet that included the current draft of the merger agreement,
a summary of the agreement and other discussion materials to
facilitate their review and consideration of the proposed
transaction, including financial analyses prepared by Credit
Suisse. During the meeting, representatives of Credit Suisse
reviewed its financial analyses with respect to Mariner and the
proposed transaction with the board, and representatives of
Baker Botts and Morris Nichols reviewed the terms of the
proposed merger agreement and the boards fiduciary duties.
During the board meeting and after the close of trading on the
New York Stock Exchange, the board was notified that an employee
of Apache had mistakenly sent an
e-mail to
investment analysts announcing a conference call for the
following day to discuss Apaches agreement to acquire
Mariner and had attempted to recall the
e-mail. The
board then agreed to recess the meeting to allow Mariners
management and advisors to inquire about what had occurred and
to continue to negotiate with respect to the outstanding issues
on the proposed merger agreement. Members of Mariners and
Apaches respective transaction teams then discussed and
resolved (subject to finalization of disclosure schedules and
board approval) all outstanding terms, including reaching
agreement to set the termination fee at $67 million, or
approximately 2.5% of the value of the equity consideration,
with a reciprocal expense reimbursement capped at
$7.5 million and credited against the termination fee if
paid. The final exchange ratio was set with reference to
Apaches closing stock price on April 13, 2010 of
$106.79.
After resolution of the outstanding issues, the Mariner board
reconvened. Credit Suisse delivered its oral opinion to the
Mariner board (which was subsequently confirmed in writing by
delivery of Credit Suisses written opinion dated
April 14, 2010), to the effect that, as of April 14,
2010, the merger consideration to be received by the holders of
Mariner common stock in the merger was fair, from a financial
point of view, to such holders. Following discussion, the board,
taking into account various factors and potential risks as
described further below under Recommendation
of the Mariner Board of Directors and Its Reasons for the
Merger, unanimously determined that the proposed merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the proposed
merger agreement were advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of Mariner and its stockholders, and approved and
adopted the proposed merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby.
54
After the parties finalized the form of, and exchanged the final
versions of, the merger agreement and disclosure schedules, the
agreement was executed by Apache, Mariner and Merger Sub, and
Apache and Mariner issued a joint press release before the
opening of trading on April 15, 2010 announcing the merger
agreement.
During the latter part of July 2010, representatives of Apache
and Mariner conducted settlement discussions with the parties to
two stockholder lawsuits filed after announcement of the merger
agreement. In connection with a memorandum of understanding to
settle the litigation, Apache and Mariner agreed to amend the
merger agreement to eliminate the termination fee in the event
that Mariner terminates the merger agreement in order to enter
into a superior proposal with another party. Apache
and Mariner executed the amendment on August 2, 2010, and
on August 3, 2010, the elimination of the termination fee
in this circumstance was publicly announced.
Recommendation
of the Mariner Board of Directors and Its Reasons for the
Merger
In reaching its decision to approve the merger and the merger
agreement and recommend the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement by Mariner stockholders, the Mariner board of
directors consulted with Mariner management, as well as with
Mariners legal and financial advisors, and considered a
number of factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that the merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
exceeded by 44.4% the median of the price targets for Mariner
common stock set by investment analysts covering Mariner;
|
|
|
|
represented a 47.3% premium to the closing price of Mariner
common stock on April 13, 2010;
|
|
|
|
represented a 64.5% premium to the average closing price for the
20 trading days ended April 13, 2010;
|
|
|
|
represented a 73.0% premium to the average closing price for the
three months ended April 13, 2010; and
|
|
|
|
represented a 93.9% premium to the average closing price for the
year ended April 13, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The boards view, in consultation with management and
Credit Suisse, that, taking into account the unique
compatibility of Mariners assets with Apaches
existing properties and operational experience, Apache would be
more likely to offer a higher price to acquire Mariner than
other potential acquirors.
|
|
|
|
The risks and opportunities of Mariner remaining an independent
company, including the competitive landscape, the risks inherent
in Mariners exploration and operating activities
(including the operating and financial risks associated with the
development of Mariners prospect inventory such as the
Heidelberg and Lucius wells), fluctuations in the availability
of capital and the volatility of commodity prices.
|
|
|
|
The risk that Mariner would not achieve or exceed a stock price
comparable to the proposed merger consideration within a
reasonable period of time.
|
|
|
|
The financial analysis reviewed and discussed with
Mariners board by representatives of Credit Suisse, as
well as the oral opinion of Credit Suisse to Mariners
board on April 14, 2010 (which was subsequently confirmed
in writing by delivery of Credit Suisses written opinion
dated the same date) with respect to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Mariner common stock
of the merger consideration to be received by such holders in
the merger.
|
|
|
|
The boards recognition that, while managements
sum of the parts analysis illustrated the view that
Mariners stock was undervalued by the market on a relative
basis compared to non-diversified pure play
companies, the upside potential values reflected in the analysis
were subject to risks and, given historical performance of
Mariners stock and analyst sentiment, the board could not
predict when, if ever, such value might be achieved. The board
believed the undervaluation had been prevalent for an
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
extended period of time and was due in part to the fact that
companies like Mariner with diversified reserve portfolios
generally trade at a discount to their pure play competitors.
The board recognized that the range of values presented in the
analysis assigned significant value to nonproved reserves that
remained subject to material operating and commodity price risks
and future availability of capital.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that the acquisition would provide Mariner stockholders
with the benefits of ownership in a much larger company with a
more diversified asset base, an investment grade credit rating,
and greater financial capacity to explore, develop and exploit
Mariners portfolio of assets.
|
|
|
|
The fact that 70% of the merger consideration will be paid in
shares of Apache common stock in a tax-free reorganization,
providing Mariner stockholders with the opportunity to
participate in any future earnings or growth of Apache and
future appreciation of Apache common stock following the merger
should they determine to retain the Apache common stock payable
in the merger.
|
|
|
|
The fact that the price of Apache common stock is generally
subject to less volatility than Mariner common stock and that
Apache stock would provide liquidity for those Mariner
stockholders who seek to sell their shares following the merger.
|
|
|
|
The fact that 30% of the merger consideration will be paid in
cash, which provides Mariner stockholders with some protection
against the value of the merger consideration diminishing due to
a decrease in the trading price of Apache common stock before
the closing of the merger.
|
|
|
|
The risk that conducting an auction process or other effort to
solicit interest from other potential buyers prior to the
execution and delivery of the merger agreement could cause
Apache to terminate discussions with Mariner.
|
|
|
|
The belief that regulatory approvals and clearances necessary to
complete the merger will likely be obtained promptly without
material cost or burden.
|
|
|
|
The terms and conditions of the merger agreement and the course
of negotiations thereof, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the structure of the transaction as a merger, requiring approval
by Mariners stockholders, which would result in detailed
public disclosure and a period of time prior to completion of
the merger during which an unsolicited superior proposal could
be brought forth;
|
|
|
|
Mariners right to engage in negotiations with, and provide
information to, a third party that makes an unsolicited
acquisition proposal if the board of directors concludes in good
faith, after consultation with its outside counsel and financial
advisors, that such proposal constitutes or is reasonably likely
to lead to a transaction that is more favorable to
Mariners stockholders than the merger;
|
|
|
|
the Mariner boards right to change or withdraw its
recommendation if it concludes in good faith that a change or
withdrawal is necessary in order to comply with its fiduciary
obligations under applicable law, subject to the payment of a
termination fee to Apache in certain circumstances;
|
|
|
|
Mariners right to terminate the merger agreement in order
to accept a superior proposal, subject to certain conditions and
payment of a termination fee to Apache;
|
|
|
|
the termination fee of $67 million, representing
approximately 2.5% of the value of the equity consideration in
the proposed transaction, which the board viewed as relatively
low compared to comparable transactions;
|
|
|
|
that it is not a condition to closing that Apache receive
financing for the cash portion of the merger
consideration; and
|
|
|
|
that Mariners stockholders will be entitled to appraisal
rights under Delaware law.
|
56
The Mariner board of directors also considered potential risks
and potentially negative factors concerning the merger in
connection with its deliberations of the proposed transaction,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
The risks and contingencies relating to the announcement and
pendency of the merger and the risks and costs to Mariner if the
closing of the merger is not timely or if the merger does not
close at all, including the diversion of management and employee
attention, potential employee attrition, the impact on
Mariners relationships with third parties and the effect a
public announcement of termination of the merger agreement may
have on the trading price of Mariners common stock and
Mariners operating results.
|
|
|
|
The potential impact of the restrictions under the merger
agreement on Mariners ability to take specified actions
during the period prior to the completion of the merger (which
may delay or prevent Mariner from undertaking business
opportunities that may arise pending completion of the merger).
|
|
|
|
The fact that the exchange ratio included in the merger
agreement provides for a fixed number of shares of Apache common
stock, the possibility that Mariner stockholders could be
adversely affected by a decrease in the trading price of Apache
common stock before the closing of the merger, and the fact that
the merger agreement does not provide Mariner with a termination
right based on the trading price of Apache common stock.
|
|
|
|
The absence of an auction process or other effort to solicit
interest from other potential buyers prior to the execution and
delivery of the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
The limitations imposed in the merger agreement on the
solicitation, negotiation or consideration by Mariner of
alternative transactions with third parties.
|
|
|
|
The provision of the merger agreement that, in certain
circumstances, Mariner could be required to pay a termination
fee of $67 million to Apache, potentially discouraging
other parties from proposing an alternative transaction with
Mariner.
|
|
|
|
The transaction costs to be incurred in connection with the
merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interests of Mariner executive officers and directors with
respect to the merger apart from their interests as Mariner
stockholders, including the 40% vesting of Mariner
Performance-Based Restricted Stock, and the risk that these
interests might influence their decisions with respect to the
merger (see Interests of the Mariner Directors
and Executive Officers in the Merger).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The risks described in the section titled Risk
Factors.
|
Subsequent to the consideration of the merger by Mariners
board, on August 2, 2010, the merger agreement was amended
by Apache and Mariner to eliminate the termination fee in the
event that Mariner terminates the merger agreement in order to
enter into a superior proposal with another party.
On August 3, 2010, the elimination of the termination fee
in this circumstance was publicly announced.
The foregoing list comprises material factors considered by
Mariners board of directors in its consideration of the
merger and is intended to be a summary rather than an exhaustive
list. In view of the wide variety of factors considered in
connection with its evaluation of the merger and the complexity
of these matters, the Mariner board of directors did not find it
useful and did not attempt to quantify or assign any relative or
specific weights to the various factors that it considered in
reaching its determination to approve the merger and the merger
agreement and to recommend that Mariner stockholders adopt the
merger agreement. In addition, individual members of the Mariner
board may have given differing weights to different factors. The
Mariner board did not reach any specific conclusion with respect
to any of the factors considered and instead conducted an
overall analysis of such factors.
The Mariner board of directors unanimously determined that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement are advisable and in the best interests of Mariner and
its stockholders, and approved and adopted the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby.
57
The Mariner board of directors unanimously recommends that
Mariner stockholders vote FOR the merger
proposal.
Opinion
of Mariners Financial Advisor
On April 14, 2010, Credit Suisse rendered its oral opinion
to Mariners board of directors (which was subsequently
confirmed in writing by delivery of Credit Suisses written
opinion dated the same date) to the effect that, as of
April 14, 2010, the merger consideration to be received by
the holders of Mariner common stock in the merger was fair, from
a financial point of view, to such holders.
Credit Suisses opinion was directed to Mariners
board of directors and only addressed the fairness to the
holders of Mariner common stock, from a financial point of view,
of the merger consideration to be received by such holders in
the merger, and did not address any other aspect or implication
of the merger. The summary of Credit Suisses opinion in
this proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of its written opinion, which is
included as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus and
sets forth the procedures followed, assumptions made,
qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken and
other matters considered by Credit Suisse in preparing its
opinion. However, neither Credit Suisses written opinion
nor the summary of its opinion and the related analyses set
forth in this proxy statement/prospectus are intended to be, and
do not constitute advice or a recommendation to any holder of
Mariner common stock as to how such stockholder should act or
vote with respect to any matter relating to the merger.
In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse:
1. reviewed the merger agreement and certain related
agreements;
2. reviewed certain publicly available business and
financial information relating to Mariner and Apache;
3. reviewed certain other information relating to Mariner
and Apache, including certain oil and gas reserve reports
prepared by the management of Mariner and certain oil and gas
reserve reports prepared by Mariners independent oil and
gas reserve engineers containing estimates with respect to
Mariners oil and gas reserves, which we refer to
collectively as the Reserve Reports;
4. reviewed certain financial forecasts relating to Mariner
provided to Credit Suisse by Mariner;
5. reviewed certain publicly available financial forecasts
relating to Apache that Credit Suisse discussed with Apache;
6. met with the managements of Mariner and Apache to
discuss the business and prospects of Mariner and Apache,
respectively;
7. considered certain financial and stock market data of
Mariner and Apache, and compared that data with similar data for
other companies with publicly traded securities in businesses
Credit Suisse deemed similar to those of Mariner and Apache;
8. considered, to the extent publicly available, the
financial terms of certain other business combinations and other
transactions which have recently been effected or
announced; and
9. considered such other information, financial studies,
analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market
criteria which Credit Suisse deemed relevant including, without
limitation, certain alternative oil and gas commodity pricing
assumptions and probabilities, which is sometimes referred to as
risking.
In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not
independently verify any of the foregoing information and
assumed and relied upon such information being complete and
accurate in all material respects. With respect to the financial
forecasts for Mariner that Credit Suisse used in its analyses,
the management of Mariner advised Credit Suisse, and Credit
Suisse assumed, that such forecasts had been reasonably prepared
on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and
judgments of the management of Mariner as to
58
the future financial performance of Mariner. With respect to the
oil and gas reserve estimates for Mariner set forth in the
Reserve Reports that Credit Suisse reviewed, the management of
Mariner advised Credit Suisse, and Credit Suisse assumed, that
such estimates had been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting
the best currently available estimates and judgments of Mariner
and its independent oil and gas reserve engineers with respect
to the oil and gas reserves of Mariner. With respect to the
alternative oil and gas commodity pricing assumptions and
risking that Credit Suisse utilized for purposes of its
analyses, Credit Suisse was advised by the management of
Mariner, and assumed, that such assumptions were a reasonable
basis on which to evaluate the future financial performance of
Mariner and were appropriate for such purposes. With respect to
the publicly available financial forecasts for Apache referred
to above, Credit Suisse reviewed and discussed such forecasts
with the management of Apache who advised Credit Suisse, and
with Mariners consent Credit Suisse assumed, that such
forecasts represented reasonable estimates and judgments with
respect to the future financial performance of Apache. Credit
Suisse assumed, with Mariners consent, that the merger
would be treated as a tax-free reorganization for federal income
tax purposes. Credit Suisse also assumed, with Mariners
consent, that, in the course of obtaining any regulatory or
third party consents, approvals or agreements in connection with
the merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition would
be imposed that would have an adverse effect on Mariner, Apache
or the contemplated benefits of the merger and that the merger
would be consummated in accordance with the terms of the merger
agreement without waiver, modification or amendment of any
material term, condition or agreement thereof. In addition,
Credit Suisse was not requested to make, and did not make, an
independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities
(contingent or otherwise) of Mariner or Apache, nor was Credit
Suisse furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals other
than the Reserve Reports. Credit Suisse is not an expert in the
evaluation of oil and gas reserves and Credit Suisse expressed
no view as to the reserve quantities, or the development or
production (including, without limitation, as to the feasibility
or timing thereof), of any oil or gas properties of Mariner.
Credit Suisses opinion addressed only the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Mariner common stock
of the merger consideration to be received by such holders in
the merger and did not address any other aspect or implication
of the merger or any other agreement, arrangement or
understanding entered into in connection with the merger or
otherwise, including, without limitation, the fairness of the
amount or nature of, or any other aspect relating to, any
compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any
party to the merger, or class of such persons, relative to the
merger consideration or otherwise. The issuance of Credit
Suisses opinion was approved by an authorized internal
committee of Credit Suisse.
Credit Suisses opinion was necessarily based upon
information made available to Credit Suisse as of the date of
its opinion and financial, economic, market and other conditions
as they existed and could be evaluated on the date of its
opinion. In addition, as Mariner was aware, the financial
projections and estimates that Credit Suisse reviewed relating
to the future financial performance of Mariner and Apache
reflected certain assumptions regarding the oil and gas industry
which are subject to significant volatility and which, if
different than assumed, could have had a material impact on
Credit Suisses analyses and opinion. Credit Suisse did not
express any opinion as to what the value of shares of Apache
common stock actually would be when issued to the holders of
Mariner common stock pursuant to the merger or the prices at
which shares of Apache common stock would trade at any time.
Credit Suisses opinion did not address the relative merits
of the merger as compared to alternative transactions or
strategies that might be available to Mariner, nor did it
address the underlying business decision of Mariner to proceed
with the merger. Credit Suisse was not requested to, and did
not, solicit third party indications of interest in acquiring
all or any part of Mariner.
Credit Suisses opinion was for the information of
Mariners board of directors in connection with its
consideration of the merger and does not constitute advice or a
recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder
should vote or act on any matter relating to the merger or
whether such stockholder should elect to receive all cash
consideration, all stock consideration or a mix of cash and
stock consideration in the merger.
In preparing its opinion to Mariners board of directors,
Credit Suisse performed a variety of analyses, including those
described below. The summary of Credit Suisses analyses
described below is not a complete description of the analyses
underlying Credit Suisses fairness opinion. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving
various quantitative and qualitative judgments and
determinations with respect to
59
the financial, comparative and other analytic methods employed
and the adaptation and application of those methods to the
unique facts and circumstances presented. As a consequence,
neither Credit Suisses opinion nor the analyses underlying
its opinion are readily susceptible to partial analysis or
summary description. Credit Suisse arrived at its opinion based
on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as
a whole and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with
regard to any individual analysis, analytic method or factor.
Accordingly, Credit Suisse believes that its analyses must be
considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its
analyses, analytic methods and factors, without considering all
analyses and factors or the narrative description of the
analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the
processes underlying its analyses and opinion.
In performing its analyses, Credit Suisse considered business,
economic, industry and market conditions, financial and
otherwise, and other matters as they existed on, and could be
evaluated as of, the date of the written opinion. No company,
transaction or business used in Credit Suisses analyses
for comparative purposes is identical to Mariner, Apache or the
merger. While the results of each analysis were taken into
account in reaching its overall conclusion with respect to
fairness, Credit Suisse did not make separate or quantifiable
judgments regarding individual analyses. The implied valuation
reference ranges indicated by Credit Suisses analyses are
illustrative and not necessarily indicative of actual values or
predictive of future results or values, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the
analyses. In addition, any analyses relating to the value of
assets, businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals
or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities
actually may be sold, which may depend on a variety of factors,
many of which are beyond Mariners control and the control
of Credit Suisse. Much of the information used in, and
accordingly the results of, Credit Suisses analyses are
inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.
Credit Suisses opinion and analyses were provided to
Mariners board of directors in connection with its
consideration of the merger and Credit Suisses analyses
were among many factors considered by Mariners board of
directors in evaluating the merger. Neither Credit Suisses
opinion nor its analyses were determinative of the merger
consideration or of the views of Mariners board of
directors with respect to the merger.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
performed in connection with the preparation of Credit
Suisses opinion rendered to Mariners board of
directors on April 14, 2010. The analyses summarized below
include information presented in tabular format. The tables
alone do not constitute a complete description of the analyses.
Considering the data in the tables below without considering the
full narrative description of the analyses, as well as the
methodologies underlying and the assumptions, qualifications and
limitations affecting each analysis, could create a misleading
or incomplete view of Credit Suisses analyses.
For purposes of its analyses, Credit Suisse reviewed a number of
financial metrics including:
Enterprise Value generally the value as of a
specified date of the relevant companys outstanding equity
securities (taking into account its options and other
outstanding convertible securities) plus the value of its
minority interests plus the value as of such date of its net
debt (the value of its outstanding indebtedness, preferred stock
and capital lease obligations less the amount of cash on its
balance sheet).
EBITDAX generally the amount of the relevant
companys earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
amortization and exploration expenses for a specified time
period.
Pre-Tax PV 10% generally means the estimated
net present value, using a discount rate of 10%, of future cash
inflows from proved reserves and applying
12-month
average prices for natural gas and oil (calculated as the
unweighted arithmetic average of the
first-day-of-the-month
price for each month within the
12-month
prior period to the end of the period), net of future
development and production costs.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, equity values used in
the selected companies analysis described below were calculated
using the closing price of the common stock of Mariner, Apache
and the selected companies listed below as of April 13,
2010. Estimates of EBITDAX and daily production for Mariner for
the fiscal years ending December 31, 2010 and 2011 were
based on projected reserves and financial data for 2010 and
reserve data for 2011, in each case provided by management of
Mariner. Estimates of EBITDAX and daily production for Apache
and the selected companies listed below for the fiscal years
ending December 31,
60
2010 and 2011 were based on publicly available research analyst
estimates. For purposes of its analyses and its opinion, Credit
Suisse assumed an implied value of the merger consideration to
be received by the holders of Mariner common stock in the merger
of $26.00 per share of Mariner common stock based on the closing
price of Apache common stock on April 13, 2010. Reserves
and production are expressed on a natural gas equivalent basis.
Selected
Companies Analysis
Credit Suisse calculated the multiples of enterprise value to
certain financial metrics for the selected companies in the oil
and gas industry deemed to be similar to Mariner or Apache, as
the case may be, in one or more respects which included nature
of business, size, diversification, financial performance and
geographic concentration.
The calculated multiples included:
Enterprise Value as a multiple of 2010E EBITDAX;
Enterprise Value as a multiple of 2011E EBITDAX;
Enterprise Value as a multiple of 2009 year-end proved
reserves;
Enterprise Value as a multiple of 2010E daily production;
Enterprise Value as a multiple of 2011E daily
production; and
Enterprise Value as a multiple of Pre-Tax PV 10% at year-end
2009.
No specific numeric or other similar criteria were used to
select the selected companies and all criteria were evaluated in
their entirety without application of definitive qualifications
or limitations to individual criteria. As a result, a
significantly larger or smaller company with substantially
similar lines of business and business focus may have been
included while a similarly sized company with less similar lines
of business and greater diversification may have been excluded.
Credit Suisse identified a sufficient number of companies for
purposes of its analysis but may not have included all companies
that might be deemed comparable to Mariner.
The selected companies were:
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
Plains Exploration & Production Company
Concho Resources Inc.
Whiting Petroleum Corporation
ATP Oil & Gas Corporation
Energy XXI (Bermuda) Limited
McMoRan Exploration Co.
Swift Energy Company
Stone Energy Corporation
W&T Offshore, Inc.
Crimson Exploration Inc.
61
The selected companies analysis indicated the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Description
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
Enterprise Value as a multiple of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E EBITDAX
|
|
|
6.0
|
x
|
|
|
5.9
|
x
|
2011E EBITDAX
|
|
|
4.2
|
x
|
|
|
4.5
|
x
|
2009 Year-End Proved Reserves ($/Mcfe)
|
|
$
|
3.47
|
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
2010E Daily Production ($/Mcfe/d)
|
|
$
|
11,501
|
|
|
$
|
12,291
|
|
2011E Daily Production ($/Mcfe/d)
|
|
$
|
10,431
|
|
|
$
|
11,120
|
|
2009 Year-End Pre-Tax PV 10%
|
|
|
2.0
|
x
|
|
|
2.2
|
x
|
Credit Suisse applied multiple ranges based on the selected
companies analysis to corresponding financial data for Mariner
including multiples of 4.5x to 5.5x 2010E EBITDAX, 3.5x to 4.5x
2011E EBITDAX, $2.50 to $3.25 2009 year-end proved
reserves, $8,000 to $10,000 2010E daily production, $7,500 to
$9,500 2011E daily production and 1.75x to 2.25x
2009 year-end Pre-Tax PV 10% to calculate an implied
reference range per share of Mariner common stock. The selected
companies analysis indicated an implied reference range per
share of Mariner common stock of $15.35 to $23.10, as compared
to the implied value of the merger consideration of $26.00 per
share of Mariner common stock.
Net
Asset Value (NAV) Analysis
Credit Suisse calculated the net present value of Mariners
unlevered, after-tax cash flows from Mariners reserves
based on the following scenarios. For purposes of the unrisked
scenarios, it was assumed that all reserves would be realized.
For purposes of the risked scenarios, it was assumed that the
classes of reserves would be realized in accordance with the
associated percentages.
Proved Reserves (1P) NAV Analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
Unrisked using the New York Mercantile
Exchange, or NYMEX, forward pricing curve for oil and natural
gas;
|
|
|
|
Unrisked Credit Suisse research analyst
pricing estimates for oil and natural gas;
|
Proved and Probable Reserves (2P) NAV Analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
Risked NYMEX forward pricing curve (Proved
(100%)/Probable (50%));
|
|
|
|
Risked Credit Suisse research analyst pricing
estimates (Proved (100%)/Probable (50%));
|
|
|
|
Unrisked NYMEX forward pricing curve;
|
|
|
|
Unrisked Credit Suisse research analyst
pricing estimates;
|
Proved, Probable and Possible Reserves (3P) + Contingent
Resources NAV Analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
Risked NYMEX forward pricing curve (Proved
(100%)/Probable (50%)/Possible and Contingent (20%));
|
|
|
|
Risked Credit Suisse research analyst pricing
estimates (Proved (100%)/Probable (50%)/Possible and Contingent
(20%));
|
|
|
|
Risked NYMEX forward pricing curve (Proved
(100%)/Probable (50%)/Possible and Contingent (50%)); and
|
|
|
|
Risked Credit Suisse research analyst pricing
estimates (Proved (100%)/Probable (50%)/Possible and Contingent
(50%)).
|
In performing this analysis, Credit Suisse calculated the net
present value of the unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that
Mariner could generate during calendar years 2010 through 2024
from its estimated reserves as of March 31, 2010. Estimated
cash flows were based on reserve and production data reflected
in reserve
62
reports prepared by independent oil and gas reserve engineers or
by Mariners management and NYMEX forward pricing curve oil
and gas commodity prices as reported on the NYMEX and Credit
Suisse research analyst pricing estimates for oil and natural
gas through 2016, thereafter increased at a rate 2% per year
through 2024. Estimated cash flows after 2024 were discounted
based on the weighted average remaining life of production. The
present value of the cash flows were calculated using discount
rates ranging from 9.0% to 11.0% based on analyses of
Mariners weighted average cost of capital. This analysis
indicated the following implied per share reference range for
Mariner common stock under the following scenarios, as compared
to the implied value of the merger consideration of $26.00 per
share of Mariner common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
Implied Reference Range per
|
|
|
Reference Range Per Share of
|
|
Share of Mariner Common Stock
|
|
|
Mariner Common Stock
|
|
(Credit Suisse Research Analyst
|
Scenario
|
|
(NYMEX Forward Pricing Curve)
|
|
Forward Pricing Estimates)
|
|
Proved Reserves (1P) NAV Analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
$
|
9.03 - $10.81
|
|
|
$
|
7.27 - $8.85
|
|
Proved and Probable Reserves (2P) NAV Analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risked (Proved (100%)/Probable (50%))
|
|
$
|
13.37 - $15.75
|
|
|
$
|
10.91 - $13.00
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
$
|
17.70 - $20.68
|
|
|
$
|
14.54 - $17.13
|
|
Proved, Probable and Possible Reserves (3P) + Contingent
Resources NAV Analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risked (Proved (100%)/Probable (50%)/Possible and Contingent
(20%))
|
|
$
|
17.62 - $21.15
|
|
|
$
|
14.29 - $17.31
|
|
Risked (Proved (100%)/Probable (50%)/Possible and Contingent
(50%))
|
|
$
|
23.97 - $29.23
|
|
|
$
|
19.33 - $23.75
|
|
Selected
Transactions Analysis
Credit Suisse calculated multiples of transaction value to
certain financial data based on the purchase prices paid in
selected publicly-announced transactions involving target
companies in the oil and gas industry, oil and gas reserve
assets in the Gulf of Mexico and onshore oil and gas reserve
assets that it deemed relevant.
The calculated multiples included:
Transaction Value as a multiple of proved reserves; and
Transaction Value as a multiple of daily production.
The selected transactions were selected because the target
companies or relevant assets were deemed to be similar to
Mariner in one or more respects including the nature of their
business, size, diversification, financial performance and
geographic concentration. No specific numeric or other similar
criteria were used to select the selected transactions and all
criteria were evaluated in their entirety without application of
definitive qualifications or limitations to individual criteria.
As a result, a transaction involving the acquisition of a
significantly larger or smaller company or significantly larger
or smaller assets with substantially similar lines of business
and business focus may have been included while a transaction
involving the acquisition of a similarly sized company or group
of assets with less similar lines of business and greater
diversification may have been excluded. Credit Suisse identified
a sufficient number of transactions for purposes of its
analysis, but may not have included all transactions that might
be deemed comparable to the merger.
63
The selected corporate transactions were:
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
Buyer
|
|
Seller
|
|
04/04/10
|
|
SandRidge Energy, Inc.
|
|
Arena Resources, Inc.
|
11/01/09
|
|
Denbury Resources Inc.
|
|
Encore Acquisition Company
|
06/05/08
|
|
Concho Resources Inc.
|
|
Henry Petroleum LP
|
04/30/08
|
|
Stone Energy Corporation
|
|
Bois dArc Energy, Inc.
|
07/17/07
|
|
Plains Exploration & Production Company
|
|
Pogo Producing Company
|
01/07/07
|
|
Forest Oil Corporation
|
|
The Houston Exploration Company
|
08/28/06
|
|
Woodside Petroleum Ltd.
|
|
Energy Partners, Ltd.
|
06/23/06
|
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
|
|
Kerr-McGee Corporation
|
05/25/06
|
|
Energy Partners, Ltd.
|
|
Stone Energy Corporation
|
04/24/06
|
|
Plains Exploration & Production Company
|
|
Stone Energy Corporation
|
04/21/06
|
|
Petrohawk Energy Corporation
|
|
KCS Energy, Inc.
|
01/23/06
|
|
Cal Dive International, Inc.
|
|
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation
|
10/13/05
|
|
Occidental Petroleum Corporation
|
|
Vintage Petroleum, Inc.
|
09/19/05
|
|
Norsk Hydro ASA
|
|
Spinnaker Exploration Company
|
04/04/05
|
|
ChevronTexaco Corporation
|
|
Unocal Corporation
|
01/26/05
|
|
Cimarex Energy Co.
|
|
Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.
|
The selected corporate transactions analysis indicated the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Description
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
Transaction Value as a multiple of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserves ($/Mcfe)
|
|
$
|
3.47
|
|
|
$
|
3.52
|
|
Daily Production ($/Mcfe/d)
|
|
$
|
12,013
|
|
|
$
|
13,258
|
|
Credit Suisse applied multiple ranges based on the selected
corporate transactions analysis to corresponding financial data
for Mariner including proved reserves and daily production to
calculate an implied reference range per share of Mariner common
stock. The selected corporate transactions analysis indicated an
implied reference range per share of Mariner common stock of
$21.17 to $26.98, as compared to the implied value of the merger
consideration of $26.00 per share of Mariner common stock.
64
The selected Gulf of Mexico oil and gas reserve asset
transactions involved:
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
Buyer
|
|
Seller
|
|
04/12/10
|
|
Apache Corporation
|
|
Devon Energy Corporation
|
11/23/09
|
|
Energy XXI (Bermuda) Limited
|
|
Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
|
02/26/08
|
|
Dynamic Offshore Resources, LLC
|
|
Superior Energy Services, Inc.
|
02/01/08
|
|
Korea National Oil Corporation / Samsung Corporation
|
|
Taylor Energy Company LLC
|
12/28/07
|
|
Mariner Energy, Inc.
|
|
Statoil ASA
|
06/21/07
|
|
McMoRan Exploration Co.
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company
|
04/30/07
|
|
Eni S.p.A.
|
|
Dominion Resources, Inc.
|
04/24/07
|
|
Energy XXI (Bermuda) Limited
|
|
Pogo Producing Company
|
05/16/06
|
|
Coldren Oil & Gas Company LP
|
|
Noble Energy, Inc.
|
04/20/06
|
|
Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
|
|
Pogo Producing Company
|
04/19/06
|
|
Apache Corporation / Stone Energy Corporation / Mariner
Energy, Inc.
|
|
BP p.l.c.
|
02/23/06
|
|
Marubeni Corporation
|
|
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
|
01/24/06
|
|
W&T Offshore, Inc.
|
|
Kerr-McGee Corporation
|
09/12/05
|
|
Mariner Energy, Inc.
|
|
Forest Oil Corporation
|
09/01/05
|
|
Woodside Petroleum Ltd.
|
|
Gryphon Exploration Company
|
04/28/05
|
|
Statoil ASA
|
|
Encana Corporation
|
The selected Gulf of Mexico oil and gas reserve asset
transactions analysis indicated the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Description
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
Transaction Value as a multiple of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserves ($/Mcfe)
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
|
$
|
4.39
|
|
Daily Production ($/Mcfe/d)
|
|
$
|
6,944
|
|
|
$
|
7,208
|
|
The selected onshore oil and gas reserve asset transactions
involved:
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
Buyer
|
|
Seller
|
|
04/05/10
|
|
Quantum Resources Management, LLC
|
|
Denbury Resources Inc.
|
03/29/10
|
|
Linn Energy, LLC
|
|
Undisclosed
|
01/11/10
|
|
Berry Petroleum Company
|
|
Undisclosed
|
12/01/09
|
|
Linn Energy, LLC
|
|
Undisclosed
|
11/30/09
|
|
SandRidge Energy, Inc.
|
|
Forest Oil Corporation
|
11/23/09
|
|
Concho Resources Inc.
|
|
Terrace Petroleum Corporation
|
09/15/09
|
|
Apollo Global Management LLC
|
|
Parallel Petroleum Corporation
|
04/30/09
|
|
Apache Corporation
|
|
Marathon Oil Corporation
|
12/21/07
|
|
Linn Energy, LLC
|
|
Lamamco Drilling Company
|
07/18/07
|
|
EV Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
Plantation Petroleum Holdings III, LLC.
|
01/18/07
|
|
Apache Corporation
|
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
|
11/02/06
|
|
St. Mary Land & Exploration Company
|
|
Undisclosed
|
04/17/06
|
|
Pogo Producing Company
|
|
Latigo Petroleum, Inc.
|
65
The selected onshore oil and gas reserve asset transactions
analysis indicated the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Description
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
Transaction Value as a multiple of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserves ($/Mcfe)
|
|
$
|
2.17
|
|
|
$
|
2.27
|
|
Daily Production ($/Mcfe/d)
|
|
$
|
15,625
|
|
|
$
|
15,970
|
|
Credit Suisse applied multiple ranges based on the selected Gulf
of Mexico oil and gas reserve asset transactions analysis to
corresponding financial data for Mariners Gulf of Mexico
oil and gas reserves and applied multiple ranges based on the
selected onshore oil and gas reserve asset transactions analysis
to corresponding financial data for Mariners onshore oil
and gas reserves to calculate an implied reference range per
share of Mariner common stock. The selected oil and gas reserve
asset transactions analysis indicated an implied reference range
per share of Mariner common stock of $17.77 to $26.50, as
compared to the implied value of the merger consideration of
$26.00 per share of Mariner common stock.
Other
Considerations
Implied Premiums Analysis. Credit Suisse also
observed the following closing stock prices for Mariner common
stock and the premium per share of Mariner common stock implied
by the merger consideration based on the closing price of Apache
common stock of $106.79 on April 13, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Value of
|
|
|
|
Premium of
|
|
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
|
Implied Value of
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration to
|
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
|
|
the Average
|
|
Spot Closing
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Closing Price of
|
|
Price of
|
|
to the Spot
|
|
|
Mariner Common
|
|
Mariner
|
|
Mariner
|
|
Price of Mariner
|
Period Prior to 4/13/2010
|
|
Stock Price
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
1 Trading Day
|
|
$
|
17.65
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
17.65
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
%
|
5 Trading Days
|
|
|
17.24
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
%
|
|
|
16.69
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
%
|
10 Trading Days
|
|
|
16.60
|
|
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.20
|
|
|
|
71.1
|
%
|
20 Trading Days
|
|
|
15.81
|
|
|
|
64.5
|
%
|
|
|
15.60
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
%
|
1 Month
|
|
|
15.79
|
|
|
|
64.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.75
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
%
|
3 Month
|
|
|
15.01
|
|
|
|
73.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.66
|
|
|
|
90.3
|
%
|
6 Month
|
|
|
14.19
|
|
|
|
83.2
|
%
|
|
|
15.20
|
|
|
|
71.1
|
%
|
1 Year
|
|
|
13.39
|
|
|
|
94.2
|
%
|
|
|
9.35
|
|
|
|
178.1
|
%
|
2 Years
|
|
|
16.49
|
|
|
|
57.6
|
%
|
|
|
27.42
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
3 Years
|
|
|
18.88
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
|
|
21.62
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
Mariners Acquisition of Forest Energy Resources, Inc.
(3/3/06)
|
|
|
18.86
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
|
|
20.27
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
%
|
Premiums Paid Analysis. Credit Suisse also
observed premiums paid in selected publicly-announced
transactions involving target companies in the oil and gas
exploration and production industry.
The premiums paid analysis indicated the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium of Implied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of the Merger
|
|
|
Selected
|
|
Consideration to the
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Price of Mariner
|
Period Prior to Public Announcement
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
1-Day Spot
Price
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
|
47.3
|
%
|
5-Day Spot
Price
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
55.8
|
%
|
10-Day Spot
Price
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
71.1
|
%
|
20-Day Spot
Price
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
66.7
|
%
|
66
Other
Matters
Mariner engaged Credit Suisse pursuant to a letter agreement
dated as of April 9, 2010 to act as the boards
financial advisor in connection with the merger. Mariner
selected Credit Suisse based on Credit Suisses experience
and reputation and knowledge of Mariner and its industry. Credit
Suisse is an internationally recognized investment banking firm
and is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, competitive
biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted
securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and
other purposes. Credit Suisse acted as financial advisor to
Mariner in connection with the merger and will receive a fee of
approximately $16.1 million for its services based on
information available as of the date hereof, approximately
$14.1 million of which is contingent upon the consummation
of the merger. In addition, Mariner has agreed to indemnify
Credit Suisse and certain related parties for certain
liabilities and other items arising out of or related to its
engagement.
Credit Suisse and its affiliates have in the past provided and
are currently providing investment banking and other financial
services to Mariner and its affiliates for which Credit Suisse
and its affiliates have received and would expect to receive
compensation, including, among other things, having acted as
lead bookrunning manager of an offering of equity and debt
securities by Mariner in June 2009, and as a lender under
Mariners credit facility. Credit Suisse and its affiliates
also have in the past provided investment banking and other
financial services to Apache and its affiliates. Credit Suisse
and its affiliates may have provided other financial advice and
services, and may in the future provide financial advice and
services, to Mariner, Apache and their respective affiliates for
which Credit Suisse and its affiliates have received, and would
expect to receive, compensation. Credit Suisse is a full service
securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage
activities as well as providing investment banking and other
financial services. In the ordinary course of business, Credit
Suisse and its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for Mariner
and Mariners affiliates own accounts and the accounts of
customers, equity, debt and other securities and financial
instruments (including bank loans and other obligations) of
Mariner, Apache and any other company that may be involved in
the merger, as well as provide investment banking and other
financial services to such companies.
Mariner
Projected Financial Information
Mariner does not as a matter of course make public projections
as to future revenues, net income or other results due to, among
other reasons, business volatility and the uncertainty of the
underlying assumptions and estimates. However, certain projected
financial information is being included in this proxy
statement/prospectus to provide you with a summary of the
projected financial information with respect to Mariner that was
made available to Mariners board of directors
and/or was
used by Credit Suisse in the preparation of the financial
analyses performed in connection with the rendering of its
opinion to the Mariner board of directors on April 14,
2010. Neither Apache nor any of its representatives were
provided with, or had any access to, the projected financial
information prior to the announcement of the proposed merger.
The projected financial information summarized below was based
on financial forecasts for 2010 relating to Mariner prepared by
Mariner management and on reserve reports prepared by
Mariners independent oil and gas reserve engineers and
Mariner management (including risking adjustments thereto based
on discussions with Mariner management) under two pricing
scenarios, the NYMEX forward pricing curve for oil and natural
gas and Credit Suisse research analyst pricing estimates for oil
and natural gas. The two pricing scenarios only indicate the
potential impact of different oil and natural gas prices. For
purposes of the unrisked scenarios, it was assumed that all
reserves would be realized. For purposes of the risked
scenarios, it was assumed that the classes of reserves would be
realized in accordance with the associated risking adjustments.
With respect to the financial forecasts for Mariner that Credit
Suisse used in its analyses, the management of Mariner advised
Credit Suisse, and Credit Suisse assumed, that such forecasts
had been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments of the management of
Mariner as to the future financial performance of Mariner.
The summary of the projected financial information is not being
included in this proxy statement/prospectus for the purpose of
influencing your decision whether to vote for the approval and
adoption of the merger agreement. The projected financial
information was not prepared with a view toward public
disclosure,
67
and the inclusion of this information should not be regarded as
an indication that any of Mariner, Credit Suisse or any other
recipient of this information considered, or now considers, it
to be predictive of actual future results. The projected
financial information was prepared on a standalone basis and is
not anticipated to be representative of the financial and
operating performance of the combined company going forward,
which could differ materially from the assumptions underlying
the projected financial information for Mariner on a standalone
basis.
Mariner and Apache caution you that uncertainties are inherent
in prospective financial information of any kind. None of
Mariner, Apache or their respective affiliates assumes any
responsibility for the accuracy of this projected financial
information, nor can they give any assurance to any Mariner
stockholder or any other person regarding the ultimate
performance of Mariner or the combined company in relation to
the summarized information set forth below.
The projected financial information was not prepared with a view
toward complying with GAAP, the published guidelines of the SEC
regarding projections or the guidelines established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for
preparation and presentation of prospective financial
information. Neither Mariners independent registered
public accounting firm, nor any other independent accountants,
have compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect
to the projected financial information contained herein, nor
have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance
on such information or its achievability. The report of
Mariners independent registered public accounting firm
contained in Mariners Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, relates to
Mariners historical financial information. It does not
extend to the projected financial information and should not be
read to do so.
The projected financial information does not take into account
any circumstances or events occurring after April 14, 2010,
the date it was prepared. Since the preparation of the
information, Mariner has made publicly available its actual
results of operations for its quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Stockholders are urged to read Mariners Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, to obtain
this information. The projected financial information does not
give effect to the merger. The board of directors of Mariner did
not prepare, and does not give any assurance regarding, the
projected financial information.
The following tables present a summary of projected Mariner
daily production, EBITDA and unlevered free cash flow in the
specified risked and unrisked scenarios, using the NYMEX forward
pricing curve and the Credit Suisse research analyst pricing
estimates for oil and natural gas. 1P refers to
proved reserves, 2P refers to proved and probable
reserves, and 3P refers to proved, probable and
possible reserves plus contingent resources.
68
Mariner
Projected Financial Information (NYMEX Forward Pricing Curve
Scenario)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
Remainder
|
|
|
Benchmark Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil WTI ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
87.13
|
|
|
$
|
90.00
|
|
|
$
|
90.98
|
|
|
$
|
91.45
|
|
|
$
|
91.91
|
|
|
$
|
92.65
|
|
|
$
|
94.51
|
|
|
$
|
96.40
|
|
|
$
|
98.32
|
|
|
$
|
100.29
|
|
|
$
|
102.30
|
|
|
$
|
104.34
|
|
|
$
|
106.43
|
|
|
$
|
108.56
|
|
|
$
|
110.73
|
|
|
$
|
126.78
|
|
Gas Henry Hub ($/Mcf)
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
6.37
|
|
|
|
6.63
|
|
|
|
6.76
|
|
|
|
6.89
|
|
|
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
7.17
|
|
|
|
7.32
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
|
|
|
7.61
|
|
|
|
7.76
|
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
|
|
9.07
|
|
Daily Production (Mmcfe/d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1P Unrisked
|
|
|
389.2
|
|
|
|
344.5
|
|
|
|
358.2
|
|
|
|
305.8
|
|
|
|
249.3
|
|
|
|
184.3
|
|
|
|
123.7
|
|
|
|
90.7
|
|
|
|
72.6
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
44.5
|
|
|
|
597.7
|
|
2P Risked (100/50)
|
|
|
402.2
|
|
|
|
371.4
|
|
|
|
402.5
|
|
|
|
351.0
|
|
|
|
296.7
|
|
|
|
235.7
|
|
|
|
176.4
|
|
|
|
131.2
|
|
|
|
97.4
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
61.4
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
54.4
|
|
|
|
686.4
|
|
2P Unrisked
|
|
|
415.2
|
|
|
|
398.3
|
|
|
|
446.8
|
|
|
|
396.1
|
|
|
|
344.2
|
|
|
|
287.2
|
|
|
|
229.0
|
|
|
|
171.8
|
|
|
|
122.2
|
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
|
|
90.2
|
|
|
|
75.8
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
|
|
|
775.1
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/20)
|
|
|
402.7
|
|
|
|
373.4
|
|
|
|
402.2
|
|
|
|
348.5
|
|
|
|
291.9
|
|
|
|
252.0
|
|
|
|
204.6
|
|
|
|
170.2
|
|
|
|
139.8
|
|
|
|
127.1
|
|
|
|
117.3
|
|
|
|
108.6
|
|
|
|
107.4
|
|
|
|
103.4
|
|
|
|
83.3
|
|
|
|
940.7
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/50)
|
|
|
403.5
|
|
|
|
376.3
|
|
|
|
401.6
|
|
|
|
344.7
|
|
|
|
284.6
|
|
|
|
276.4
|
|
|
|
247.0
|
|
|
|
228.7
|
|
|
|
203.4
|
|
|
|
190.8
|
|
|
|
183.3
|
|
|
|
176.6
|
|
|
|
176.6
|
|
|
|
165.3
|
|
|
|
126.6
|
|
|
|
1,322.1
|
|
EBITDA ($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1P Unrisked
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
749
|
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
|
$
|
681
|
|
|
$
|
569
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
1,481
|
|
2P Risked (100/50)
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
2P Unrisked
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/20)
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/50)
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
5,851
|
|
Unlevered Free Cash Flow ($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1P Unrisked
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
|
$
|
513
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
343
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
908
|
|
2P Risked (100/50)
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
2P Unrisked
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/20)
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/50)
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
69
Mariner
Projected Financial Information (Credit Suisse Research Analyst
Pricing Estimates Scenario)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
Remainder
|
|
|
Benchmark Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil WTI ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
70.00
|
|
|
$
|
71.40
|
|
|
$
|
72.85
|
|
|
$
|
74.18
|
|
|
$
|
75.77
|
|
|
$
|
77.23
|
|
|
$
|
78.81
|
|
|
$
|
80.41
|
|
|
$
|
82.02
|
|
|
$
|
83.66
|
|
|
$
|
85.33
|
|
|
$
|
87.04
|
|
|
$
|
88.78
|
|
|
$
|
90.55
|
|
|
$
|
92.36
|
|
|
$
|
108.33
|
|
Gas Henry Hub ($/Mcf)
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
7.14
|
|
|
|
7.28
|
|
|
|
7.43
|
|
|
|
7.58
|
|
|
|
7.73
|
|
|
|
7.88
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
|
|
8.20
|
|
|
|
8.37
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
|
|
|
8.70
|
|
|
|
8.88
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
Daily Production (Mmcfe/d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1P Unrisked
|
|
|
389.2
|
|
|
|
344.5
|
|
|
|
358.2
|
|
|
|
305.8
|
|
|
|
249.3
|
|
|
|
184.3
|
|
|
|
123.7
|
|
|
|
90.7
|
|
|
|
72.6
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
44.5
|
|
|
|
597.7
|
|
2P Risked (100/50)
|
|
|
402.2
|
|
|
|
371.4
|
|
|
|
402.5
|
|
|
|
351.0
|
|
|
|
296.7
|
|
|
|
235.7
|
|
|
|
176.4
|
|
|
|
131.2
|
|
|
|
97.4
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
61.4
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
54.4
|
|
|
|
686.4
|
|
2P Unrisked
|
|
|
415.2
|
|
|
|
398.3
|
|
|
|
446.8
|
|
|
|
396.1
|
|
|
|
344.2
|
|
|
|
287.2
|
|
|
|
229.0
|
|
|
|
171.8
|
|
|
|
122.2
|
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
|
|
90.2
|
|
|
|
75.8
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
|
|
|
775.1
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/20)
|
|
|
402.7
|
|
|
|
373.4
|
|
|
|
402.2
|
|
|
|
348.5
|
|
|
|
291.9
|
|
|
|
252.0
|
|
|
|
204.6
|
|
|
|
170.2
|
|
|
|
139.8
|
|
|
|
127.1
|
|
|
|
117.3
|
|
|
|
108.6
|
|
|
|
107.4
|
|
|
|
103.4
|
|
|
|
83.3
|
|
|
|
940.7
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/50)
|
|
|
403.5
|
|
|
|
376.3
|
|
|
|
401.6
|
|
|
|
344.7
|
|
|
|
284.6
|
|
|
|
276.4
|
|
|
|
247.0
|
|
|
|
228.7
|
|
|
|
203.4
|
|
|
|
190.8
|
|
|
|
183.3
|
|
|
|
176.6
|
|
|
|
176.6
|
|
|
|
165.3
|
|
|
|
126.6
|
|
|
|
1,322.1
|
|
EBITDA ($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1P Unrisked
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
$
|
763
|
|
|
$
|
662
|
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
1,178
|
|
2P Risked (100/50)
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
2P Unrisked
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/20)
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/50)
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
Unlevered Free Cash Flow ($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1P Unrisked
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
2P Risked (100/50)
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
2P Unrisked
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/20)
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
3P Risked (100/50/50)
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
2,837
|
|
70
The projected financial information is subjective in many
respects and thus subject to interpretation. Although presented
with numeric specificity, the projected financial information
reflects numerous estimates and assumptions with respect to oil
and gas industry activity, commodity prices, demand for natural
gas and crude oil, North American and international rig count,
capacity utilization and general economic and regulatory
conditions, and matters specific to Mariners business,
many of which are beyond Mariners control. The projected
financial information was prepared solely for internal use and
is subjective in many respects. Since the projected financial
information covers multiple years, such information by its
nature becomes less predictive with each successive year.
Readers of this proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on the projected financial information set
forth above. Stockholders are urged to review Mariners
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, Mariners
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and future SEC filings
for a description of risk factors with respect to Mariners
business. See Cautionary Statement Concerning
Forward-Looking Statements and Where You Can Find
More Information; Incorporation by Reference. No
representation is made by Mariner, Apache or any other person to
any stockholder regarding the ultimate performance of Mariner
compared to the projected financial information. No
representation was made by Mariner to Apache in the merger
agreement concerning this information.
MARINER DOES NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE
PROJECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES
EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN MADE OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE
OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE
ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING SUCH PROJECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION ARE
NO LONGER APPROPRIATE.
Share
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers of
Mariner
At the close of business on the record date for the special
meeting ([], 2010), the directors and executive officers
of Mariner and their affiliates beneficially owned and were
entitled to vote [] shares of Mariner common
stock, collectively representing approximately []% of the
shares of Mariner common stock outstanding and entitled to vote
on the record date. It is expected that Mariners directors
and executive officers will vote their shares FOR
the approval and adoption of the merger agreement, although none
of them has entered into any agreement requiring them to do so.
Interests
of the Mariner Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger
In considering the recommendation of Mariners board of
directors with respect to the merger, Mariner stockholders
should be aware that the executive officers and directors of
Mariner have certain interests in the merger that may be
different from, or in addition to, the interests of Mariner
stockholders. Mariners board of directors was aware of
these interests and considered them, among other matters, when
adopting a resolution to approve the merger agreement and
recommending that Mariner stockholders vote to approve and adopt
the merger agreement. These interests are summarized below.
Employment
Arrangements with Apache Following the Merger
As of the date hereof, the only Mariner director or executive
officer to whom Apache has made an offer of, and received an
acknowledgment of intention to accept, continued employment
following the merger is Cory L. Loegering, Mariners Senior
Vice President Deepwater. Mr. Loegerings
employment with Apache would be at will, and his
offer letter is not a contract for employment nor will there be
any employment agreement with Apache. Apache anticipates that
additional members of Mariner management may receive offers
and/or
express their intention to accept employment with Apache;
however, such matters are subject to negotiations and discussion.
Mr. Loegerings employment with Apache is subject to
his waiver, at the time of consummation of the merger, of all
rights under his existing employment agreement with Mariner. If
this waiver occurs and Mr. Loegering becomes an Apache
employee, he will be treated differently from other Mariner
executives as described herein.
71
Pursuant to the letter setting forth the terms of Apaches
offer of continued employment, Mr. Loegering would serve as
Region Vice President, Deepwater for Apache, receive an annual
base salary of $290,000, and be eligible for a target annual
performance-based bonus of 100% of base salary. He would also be
eligible to receive long-term equity grants, currently made in
January and May of each year, subject to Apache Board approval
and modification. As an incentive to Mr. Loegerings
employment with Apache, he will be entitled to a retention
payment of $932,500 on December 31 of each of 2010 and 2012 if
he continues to be employed by Apache on such dates. If
Mr. Loegering is terminated without cause before
December 31, 2010 he will be entitled to receive a
severance payment of $1,865,000 upon termination, and if he is
terminated without cause on or after December 31, 2010 but
before December 31, 2012 he will be entitled to receive a
severance payment of $932,500 upon termination. In addition, he
will have the right to receive tax gross-up payments with
respect to any such severance payments that are parachute
payments subject to Federal excise tax. Mr. Loegering
will also be entitled to the February 15, 2011 retention
bonus pursuant to the merger agreement as described below under
Retention and Severance Arrangements Under the
Merger Agreement, which will be at least equal to his 2009
bonus of $450,000.
If Mr. Loegering waives his rights under his existing
employment agreement with Mariner as described above and his
employment with Apache becomes effective, he will still receive
the amount of benefits set forth next to his name under each of
the columns in the table on page [ ] of
this proxy statement/prospectus, except that (i) the amount
listed under Cash Severance Payments will not be
paid at closing, (ii) if he remains employed by Apache on
February 15, 2011, he will receive a minimum $450,000
retention bonus, (iii) to the extent the aggregate amount
payable in respect of services rendered after closing is subject
to the Federal excise tax, the amount listed under Tax
Gross Up may be up to $1,375,459 and (iv) he will not
receive the Value of Other Severance Benefits,
resulting in an amount under the Total column of up
to $7,538,125. Other than as described above, Mr. Loegering
will be treated the same as other Mariner officers as described
below.
Treatment
of Equity Awards
Upon completion of the merger, each outstanding share of Mariner
restricted stock (other than Performance-Based Restricted Stock)
will vest and will entitle the holder to the merger
consideration in respect of each such vested share. In the
merger agreement, Apache agreed that 40% of each outstanding
award of Performance-Based Restricted Stock will vest and will
entitle the holder to the merger consideration in respect of
each such vested share, and the remaining portion of each award
of Performance-Based Restricted Stock will be cancelled. Partial
vesting of outstanding Performance-Based Restricted Stock awards
occurs solely as a result of the terms of the merger agreement;
otherwise, under the terms of Mariners 2008 Long-Term
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program, 100% of the
Performance-Based Restricted Stock would be forfeited because
40% of such stock does not begin to vest until Mariners
stock price reaches a sustained $38 per share and the remaining
60% does not begin to vest until Mariners stock price
reaches a sustained $46 per share. Apache agreed to the
partial vesting in order to provide additional incentive to
senior Mariner employees to remain employed through the closing
of the merger, to foster a positive working relationship with
Apaches future employees, and in recognition of the fact
that the shares would otherwise be forfeited in only the third
year of the ten-year program. On the date the merger agreement
was executed, the value of merger consideration associated with
such partial vesting was approximately $12.4 million based on a
price of $26 per share for Mariner common stock.
In addition, upon completion of the merger, each outstanding
option to purchase Mariner common stock will be converted into a
fully exercisable option to purchase the number of shares of
Apache common stock obtained by multiplying the number of
Mariner shares subject to the option by the 0.24347 exchange
ratio, with a per share exercise price equal to the existing
per-Mariner-share exercise price divided by the 0.24347 exchange
ratio. All outstanding options to acquire Mariner common stock
were fully vested and exercisable by December 31, 2008.
72
The following table sets forth information concerning unvested
restricted stock held by Mariners executive officers and
directors as of July 29, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Unvested
|
|
Number of Unvested
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Non-
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-Based
|
|
Performance-Based
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock that
|
|
Restricted Stock that
|
|
|
|
|
Will Vest at Merger
|
|
Will Vest at Merger
|
|
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
Closing
|
|
Total
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott D. Josey
|
|
|
481,901
|
|
|
|
94,824
|
|
|
|
576,725
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jesus G. Melendrez
|
|
|
139,605
|
|
|
|
22,126
|
|
|
|
161,731
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer,
Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dalton F. Polasek
|
|
|
205,379
|
|
|
|
35,822
|
|
|
|
241,201
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mike C. van den Bold
|
|
|
163,047
|
|
|
|
26,340
|
|
|
|
189,387
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Exploration Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judd A. Hansen
|
|
|
143,564
|
|
|
|
26,340
|
|
|
|
169,904
|
|
Senior Vice President Shelf and Onshore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teresa G. Bushman
|
|
|
111,297
|
|
|
|
22,126
|
|
|
|
133,423
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cory L. Loegering
|
|
|
123,925
|
|
|
|
22,126
|
|
|
|
146,051
|
|
Senior Vice President Deepwater
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murray W. Grigg
|
|
|
68,027
|
|
|
|
6,848
|
|
|
|
74,875
|
|
Vice President Unconventional Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emily R. McClung
|
|
|
13,018
|
|
|
|
5,896
|
|
|
|
18,914
|
|
Vice President Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael C. McCullough
|
|
|
44,893
|
|
|
|
6,848
|
|
|
|
51,741
|
|
Vice President Acquisitions and Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Molohon
|
|
|
60,522
|
|
|
|
10,536
|
|
|
|
71,058
|
|
Vice President Reservoir Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth E. Moore, Jr.
|
|
|
36,693
|
|
|
|
6,848
|
|
|
|
43,541
|
|
Vice President Onshore Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles H. Odom
|
|
|
35,170
|
|
|
|
6,848
|
|
|
|
42,018
|
|
Vice President Offshore Land and Business
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Cris Sherman
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
6,848
|
|
|
|
16,756
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Employee Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard Aronson
|
|
|
15,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,413
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan R. Crain, Jr.
|
|
|
15,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,413
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Ginns
|
|
|
15,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,413
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Greene
|
|
|
15,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,413
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Clayton Peterson
|
|
|
15,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,413
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laura A. Sugg
|
|
|
8,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,517
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
and Change of Control Arrangements
Mariner has employment agreements with its executive officers
which will survive the merger. The employment agreements provide
for severance and change of control benefits. The completion of
the merger
73
will be considered a change of control under these
agreements. For purposes of this discussion, references to
Mariner include the corporation surviving the merger.
Severance Benefits. Under the employment
agreements, Mariner agrees to provide the following severance
benefits if it terminates the executives employment
without cause, or he or she terminates his or her employment for
good reason, or in the case of Mr. Josey, Mariner does not
renew his agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
a lump sum severance payment equal to 2.99 (for
Messrs. Josey, McCullough and Moore), 2.5 (for
Messrs. Melendrez, Polasek, van den Bold, Hansen and
Loegering and Ms. Bushman) and 2.0 (for Messrs. Grigg,
Molohon, Odom and Sherman, and Ms. McClung) times the sum
of his or her base salary plus three-year average annual
bonus; and
|
|
|
|
health care coverage for the executive, his or her spouse and
dependents for two years (for Messrs. Josey and Polasek) or
18 months (for the other executives) after termination
under Mariners group health plan on the same basis as its
active executive employees (except to the extent another
employers group health care coverage is available),
provided that the executive must reimburse Mariner for his or
her portion of the premium on a monthly basis.
|
To be eligible for severance under the employment agreements,
the executive must agree in writing to waive and release claims
against Mariner arising before termination. The executive also
must keep in confidence and not use Mariner confidential
information for two years after termination. If within one year
after an executives termination Mariners board
determines cause existed before, on or after the termination, he
or she is ineligible for severance and must return to Mariner
any severance paid.
The employment agreements define cause and
good reason as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner can terminate the executives employment for
cause if the executive:
|
(1) is grossly negligent in performing his or her duties,
materially mismanages the performance of his or her duties, or
materially fails or is unable (other than due to death or
disability) to perform his or her duties,
(2) commits any act of willful misconduct or material
dishonesty against Mariner or any act that results in, or could
reasonably be expected to result in, material injury to
Mariners reputation, business or business relationships,
(3) materially breaches the agreement, any fiduciary duty
owed to Mariner, or any written policies applicable to him or
her,
(4) is convicted of, or enters a plea bargain, a plea of
nolo contendre or settlement admitting guilt for, any
felony, any crime of moral turpitude, or any other crime that
could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse impact
on Mariner or its reputation, or
(5) materially violates any federal law regulating
securities (without having relied on the advice of
Mariners legal counsel to perform certain required acts)
or is subject to any final order, judicial or administrative,
obtained or issued by the SEC, for any securities violation
involving fraud.
|
|
|
|
|
The executive can terminate his or her employment for
good reason if, without his or her
consent:
|
(1) Mariner materially breaches the agreement,
(2) Mariner requires the executive to relocate outside of
the Houston metropolitan area,
(3) Mariners successor fails to assume the agreement
by the time it acquires substantially all of its equity, assets
or businesses,
(4) Mariner materially reduces the executives title,
responsibilities, or duties, including, in the case of
Mr. Josey, a change that causes him to cease reporting to
the board, and in the case of
74
Mr. Polasek and Ms. Bushman, the board directs him or
her to cease reporting to